Development of a Cold Gas Propulsion System for the ... - SSL - MIT
Development of a Cold Gas Propulsion System for the ... - SSL - MIT Development of a Cold Gas Propulsion System for the ... - SSL - MIT
Figure 4-4. Results of the example run of the CGSE MATLAB model. Figure 4-4(a) shows that when fully fueled to maximum pressure of 4500 psia, the CGSE tanks hold 4.14 kg of nitrogen. By the end of the modeled hop, this has been depleted to 0.21 kg at a pressure of approximately 900 psia. Figure 4-4(b) shows that this is still higher than the chamber pressure, which for this run was set at 500 psia, so there was some additional margin of propellant available for the unmodeled attitude control, and it was concluded that this example flight profile would be feasible. The temperature of the nitrogen in the CGSE declines throughout the hop as illustrated in Figure 4-4(c), with the chamber temperature always somewhat lower than the tank temperature due to the Joule- Thomson effect. According to the model, the final temperature of the nitrogen is about 129 K in the tank and 126 K in the thruster chamber. The critical point of nitrogen is at 492 psi and 126.2 K [43], so the model indicates that at the very end of the hop, the nitrogen could begin to liquefy in the thrusters. However, the model had many known simplifications and was designed to model the worst-case scenario, and conditions only crossed the critical point in the last few timesteps of the model, so this example profile was considered provisionally acceptable. Still, the possible condensation of nitrogen at the end of a hop was a concern kept in mind until testing confirmed that it would not be a problem. For the purposes of CGSE design, the most important outputs of the MATLAB model were plots such as the one in Figure 4-4(d) showing the required
hop, any given valve or regulator only has one
- Page 17 and 18: Notation Acronyms and Abbreviations
- Page 19 and 20: N newton Pa pascal psi pounds per s
- Page 21 and 22: 1 Introduction The TALARIS (Terrest
- Page 23 and 24: the idea of hopping was born, and i
- Page 25 and 26: However, as stated before, this doe
- Page 27 and 28: Figure 2-3. Diagram of ACAT lander
- Page 29 and 30: An alternate approach to resolving
- Page 31 and 32: accurate conditions for testing GNC
- Page 33 and 34: Ballistic hops tend to use less pro
- Page 35 and 36: 2.3.2 Comparison of Cold Gas and Mo
- Page 37 and 38: Handling propellant There are sever
- Page 39 and 40: and if the cold gas system was foun
- Page 41 and 42: 3 TALARIS CGSE Design Framework Aft
- Page 43 and 44: Figure 3-1. Scaling of TALARIS terr
- Page 45 and 46: (3) Providing attitude control Ther
- Page 47 and 48: Figure 3-2 also shows the body coor
- Page 49 and 50: 4 Modeling and Flow Control Compone
- Page 51 and 52: 4.1.2 Rocket Propulsion Equations L
- Page 53 and 54: variables in equation (4-8) deal wi
- Page 55 and 56: equations. Equation (4-10) was then
- Page 57 and 58: that of helium (0.227 MPa = 32.9 ps
- Page 59 and 60: thruster solenoid valve, and chambe
- Page 61 and 62: where
- Page 63 and 64: discussed later in section 6.3.4, t
- Page 65: The flight profile begins with maxi
- Page 69 and 70: esponse time was an important perfo
- Page 71 and 72: directly opens and closes the main
- Page 73 and 74: If 1D isentropic flow is assumed, t
- Page 75 and 76: 5 Single-Stream Component Testing A
- Page 77 and 78: the solenoid valve, and a pressure
- Page 79 and 80: As indicated in Figure 5-3, initial
- Page 81 and 82: Figure 5-5. CGSE high side as const
- Page 83 and 84: Figure 5-7 illustrates several aspe
- Page 85 and 86: 6 Full Eight-Thruster Flight System
- Page 87 and 88: Figure 6-2. TALARIS CGSE assembled
- Page 89 and 90: stream tests revealed that changes
- Page 91 and 92: Figure 6-5. Original CGSE control c
- Page 93 and 94: other constraints. This was difficu
- Page 95 and 96: variables (such as number of thrust
- Page 97 and 98: One solution to this problem would
- Page 99 and 100: One of the characterization tests w
- Page 101 and 102: or more thrusters were firing toget
- Page 103 and 104: Table 6-3. Valve timing metrics dur
- Page 105 and 106: Figure 6-11. Redesigned CGSE contro
- Page 107 and 108: The imaginary simplified thruster c
- Page 109 and 110: traverse phase of a hop and involve
- Page 111 and 112: Figure 7-3. GNC data from 3-DOF tes
- Page 113 and 114: Tests on this vertical stand demons
- Page 115 and 116: control the belay line can be put u
Figure 4-4. Results <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> example run <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> CGSE MATLAB model.<br />
Figure 4-4(a) shows that when fully fueled to maximum pressure <strong>of</strong> 4500 psia, <strong>the</strong> CGSE tanks hold 4.14<br />
kg <strong>of</strong> nitrogen. By <strong>the</strong> end <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> modeled hop, this has been depleted to 0.21 kg at a pressure <strong>of</strong><br />
approximately 900 psia. Figure 4-4(b) shows that this is still higher than <strong>the</strong> chamber pressure, which <strong>for</strong><br />
this run was set at 500 psia, so <strong>the</strong>re was some additional margin <strong>of</strong> propellant available <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
unmodeled attitude control, and it was concluded that this example flight pr<strong>of</strong>ile would be feasible. The<br />
temperature <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> nitrogen in <strong>the</strong> CGSE declines throughout <strong>the</strong> hop as illustrated in Figure 4-4(c), with<br />
<strong>the</strong> chamber temperature always somewhat lower than <strong>the</strong> tank temperature due to <strong>the</strong> Joule-<br />
Thomson effect. According to <strong>the</strong> model, <strong>the</strong> final temperature <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> nitrogen is about 129 K in <strong>the</strong> tank<br />
and 126 K in <strong>the</strong> thruster chamber. The critical point <strong>of</strong> nitrogen is at 492 psi and 126.2 K [43], so <strong>the</strong><br />
model indicates that at <strong>the</strong> very end <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> hop, <strong>the</strong> nitrogen could begin to liquefy in <strong>the</strong> thrusters.<br />
However, <strong>the</strong> model had many known simplifications and was designed to model <strong>the</strong> worst-case<br />
scenario, and conditions only crossed <strong>the</strong> critical point in <strong>the</strong> last few timesteps <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> model, so this<br />
example pr<strong>of</strong>ile was considered provisionally acceptable. Still, <strong>the</strong> possible condensation <strong>of</strong> nitrogen at<br />
<strong>the</strong> end <strong>of</strong> a hop was a concern kept in mind until testing confirmed that it would not be a problem.<br />
For <strong>the</strong> purposes <strong>of</strong> CGSE design, <strong>the</strong> most important outputs <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> MATLAB model were plots such as<br />
<strong>the</strong> one in Figure 4-4(d) showing <strong>the</strong> required