Development of a Cold Gas Propulsion System for the ... - SSL - MIT
Development of a Cold Gas Propulsion System for the ... - SSL - MIT
Development of a Cold Gas Propulsion System for the ... - SSL - MIT
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
3 TALARIS CGSE Design Framework<br />
After <strong>the</strong> major architecture decisions had been made <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> TALARIS spacecraft emulator propulsion<br />
system, <strong>the</strong> next step was detailed design. The goal <strong>of</strong> this development process was not to develop a<br />
radically new propulsion system, which would have been extremely difficult given <strong>the</strong> limited budget<br />
and relatively short deadlines <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> TALARIS project; cold gas propulsion technology is mature enough<br />
that <strong>the</strong>re is little room <strong>for</strong> drastic improvement. Ra<strong>the</strong>r, <strong>the</strong> aim <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> process described in this <strong>the</strong>sis<br />
was to make specific choices that most effectively satisfied <strong>the</strong> particular needs <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> TALARIS project<br />
while working within <strong>the</strong> generally well-established framework <strong>of</strong> cold gas propulsion system design.<br />
3.1 CGSE Requirements Definition<br />
The architecture definition process had placed some constraints on <strong>the</strong> design problem, such as <strong>the</strong><br />
decision that <strong>the</strong> spacecraft emulator propulsion system would be a cold gas propulsion system, as well<br />
as a set <strong>of</strong> functional requirements. But in order to have definite targets to which to design <strong>the</strong> TALARIS<br />
CGSE, <strong>the</strong> process <strong>of</strong> requirements definition had to be carried fur<strong>the</strong>r <strong>for</strong>ward. The requirements<br />
already determined were used to derive quantifiable per<strong>for</strong>mance requirements.<br />
3.1.1 Functional Requirements<br />
The decisions to (1) divide <strong>the</strong> TALARIS propulsion tasks into weight relief and spacecraft emulation,<br />
each per<strong>for</strong>med by a separate system, and (2) design <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> per<strong>for</strong>mance <strong>of</strong> a hover hop led to three<br />
main functional requirements <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> TALARIS spacecraft emulator propulsion system. They were:<br />
(1) The CGSE shall lift <strong>the</strong> TALARIS hopper’s lunar weight, defined as 1/6 <strong>of</strong> its Earth weight.<br />
Though <strong>the</strong> long-term goals <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> TALARIS project include simulation <strong>of</strong> operations on a range <strong>of</strong> target<br />
bodies, <strong>the</strong> short deadlines <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> GLXP made simulation <strong>of</strong> lunar operations <strong>the</strong> top priority.<br />
Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore, a CGSE capable <strong>of</strong> lifting <strong>the</strong> TALARIS hopper under lunar gravity could also function <strong>for</strong><br />
many o<strong>the</strong>r targets with even lower gravities, including Saturn’s moon Titan 2<br />
or a variety <strong>of</strong> asteroids, if<br />
EDF output could be increased to provide a higher fraction <strong>of</strong> weight relief. If later operations on a body<br />
with higher gravity than <strong>the</strong> Moon, such as Mars, were desired, upgrades would be necessary unless <strong>the</strong><br />
CGSE far exceeded its design goals. However, it was essential to set initial numerical design targets <strong>for</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong> CGSE, and designing <strong>for</strong> lunar gravity was selected <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> requirement.<br />
2<br />
Titan has a surface gravity <strong>of</strong> 0.138