- Page 1: Development of a Cold Gas Propulsio
- Page 7: Acknowledgements This work was perf
- Page 10 and 11: 4.1.4 Flow Equations ..............
- Page 13 and 14: List of Figures Figure 1-1. Ultra-p
- Page 15: List of Tables Table 2-1. Lunar lan
- Page 18 and 19: NI National Instruments NIST Nation
- Page 20 and 21: N newton Pa pascal psi pounds per s
- Page 22 and 23: designed to use the same propulsion
- Page 24 and 25: 2 Propulsion System Architecture Al
- Page 26 and 27: propulsion tasks will be grouped an
- Page 28 and 29: Figure 2-4. NASA robotic lunar land
- Page 30 and 31: System Table 2-1. Lunar lander test
- Page 32 and 33: 2.3 Confirming the Decision to Use
- Page 34 and 35: from the higher specific impulse wh
- Page 36 and 37: ut also on a per-volume basis. This
- Page 38 and 39: Hydrogen peroxide at the concentrat
- Page 40 and 41: Helium (He) Helium was considered b
- Page 42 and 43: (2) The CGSE shall propel the hoppe
- Page 44 and 45: (1) Lifting the hopper’s lunar we
- Page 46 and 47: simplicity of control, it was decid
- Page 48 and 49: Figure 3-3. CGSE system schematic [
- Page 50 and 51: 4.1.1 Flight Profiles Hopper flight
- Page 52 and 53:
4.1.2 Rocket Propulsion Equations L
- Page 54 and 55:
equations. Equation (4-10) was then
- Page 56 and 57:
The other new variables in equation
- Page 58 and 59:
The Joule-Thomson coefficient
- Page 60 and 61:
The first step in calculating
- Page 62 and 63:
(4-29) were used as printed to conv
- Page 64 and 65:
• Neither the Joule-Thomson effec
- Page 66 and 67:
Figure 4-4. Results of the example
- Page 68 and 69:
flight profile. This meant that the
- Page 70 and 71:
fast response times on the order of
- Page 72 and 73:
The 44-1363-2122-408 regulator had
- Page 74 and 75:
Figure 4-7. Drawing of CGSE nozzle
- Page 76 and 77:
this would be achieved with the reg
- Page 78 and 79:
was controlled manually; later, mod
- Page 80 and 81:
5.2.3 High Side of CGSE As mentione
- Page 82 and 83:
5.3 Results Originally, it was plan
- Page 84 and 85:
were run with the apparatus set up
- Page 86 and 87:
In order to increase the amount of
- Page 88 and 89:
Figure 6-3 shows all three of the m
- Page 90 and 91:
However, a solenoid is an inductor,
- Page 92 and 93:
6.3.1 Thruster Identification To tr
- Page 94 and 95:
6.3.3 Thrust Output Characterizatio
- Page 96 and 97:
Thruster-seconds are something of a
- Page 98 and 99:
Table 6-1. Maximum thrust levels fo
- Page 100 and 101:
Table 6-2. Thruster directions as u
- Page 102 and 103:
of the thruster valves never shut c
- Page 104 and 105:
Figure 6-10. Redesigned CGSE contro
- Page 106 and 107:
closer to the valve timing performa
- Page 108 and 109:
7 Ongoing and Future Work There are
- Page 110 and 111:
Figure 7-2. CGSE 3-DOF horizontal t
- Page 112 and 113:
7.1.2 Vertical Test Stand For initi
- Page 114 and 115:
Therefore, the vertical test stand
- Page 116 and 117:
and adjustments made to account for
- Page 118 and 119:
the gains in propellant carrying ca
- Page 120 and 121:
8 Conclusion The TALARIS CGSE is an
- Page 122 and 123:
would not have been sufficient on i
- Page 124 and 125:
Works Cited [1] National Aeronautic
- Page 126 and 127:
[20] Fiorini, P., Hayati, S., Hever
- Page 128 and 129:
[40] Hill, P. G. and Peterson, C. R
- Page 130:
[61] Morrow, J., Nothnagel, S. L.,