Development of a Cold Gas Propulsion System for the ... - SSL - MIT
Development of a Cold Gas Propulsion System for the ... - SSL - MIT
Development of a Cold Gas Propulsion System for the ... - SSL - MIT
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
2 <strong>Propulsion</strong> <strong>System</strong> Architecture<br />
Although most major architecture decisions <strong>for</strong> TALARIS were made be<strong>for</strong>e <strong>the</strong> work described in this<br />
<strong>the</strong>sis began, it is useful to discuss o<strong>the</strong>r approaches <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> propulsion <strong>of</strong> prototype or simulator<br />
landers and exploration vehicles. For one thing, a brief review <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> spacecraft emulator propulsion<br />
system was conducted be<strong>for</strong>e detailed design work began, to ensure that <strong>the</strong> decisions made <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
original concept were still valid even though <strong>the</strong> TALARIS design had evolved in o<strong>the</strong>r areas.<br />
Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore, understanding <strong>the</strong> strengths and weaknesses <strong>of</strong> cold gas propulsion compared to <strong>the</strong><br />
o<strong>the</strong>r options that might have been selected provides insight into <strong>the</strong> design decisions made.<br />
2.1 Vehicles O<strong>the</strong>r Than TALARIS<br />
Since hopping is not a common method <strong>of</strong> exploring planetary surfaces, <strong>the</strong>re is little precedent <strong>for</strong><br />
prototype or testbed vehicles built <strong>for</strong> this purpose. The closest analogues to TALARIS are Earth-based<br />
lunar lander testing vehicles. Several different concepts have been developed <strong>for</strong> vehicles <strong>of</strong> this type,<br />
but <strong>the</strong>y all face <strong>the</strong> problem <strong>of</strong> predicting lunar per<strong>for</strong>mance from tests per<strong>for</strong>med on Earth. From a<br />
propulsion perspective, <strong>the</strong> major difference between Earth and <strong>the</strong> Moon is gravity; about six times<br />
more <strong>for</strong>ce is needed to lift an object on <strong>the</strong> Earth as compared to lifting an object <strong>of</strong> equal mass on <strong>the</strong><br />
Moon. The atmosphere on Earth also introduces <strong>for</strong>ces that are not present on <strong>the</strong> Moon, but <strong>the</strong><br />
effects <strong>of</strong> wind can be mitigated by operating on calm days or even indoors, and drag <strong>for</strong>ces <strong>for</strong> most<br />
vehicles are small compared to <strong>the</strong> <strong>for</strong>ces needed to overcome gravity and to accelerate <strong>the</strong> vehicle <strong>for</strong><br />
horizontal transit.<br />
One approach to testing a lunar vehicle on <strong>the</strong> Earth is to simply operate <strong>the</strong> system as designed <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
Moon, as long as it is powerful enough to operate in <strong>the</strong> higher gravity <strong>of</strong> Earth. Mission pr<strong>of</strong>iles may be<br />
scaled in terms <strong>of</strong> distance or time such that <strong>the</strong>y use an equivalent amount <strong>of</strong> delta-V <strong>for</strong> a scaled flight<br />
on Earth as <strong>the</strong>y would <strong>for</strong> actual operations on <strong>the</strong> Moon. This was <strong>the</strong> approach taken <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
Northrop Grumman Lunar Lander Challenge, <strong>for</strong> which <strong>the</strong> goal was to simulate a descent from lunar<br />
orbit, refueling, and return to lunar orbit [7]. An equivalent task <strong>for</strong> demonstration on Earth was<br />
designed to involve taking <strong>of</strong>f from a concrete pad, ascending to an altitude <strong>of</strong> approximately 50 m,<br />
flying 50 m horizontally, and landing on a second concrete pad, with refueling and a return flight within<br />
two hours and fifteen minutes. The vehicle had to remain al<strong>of</strong>t <strong>for</strong> at least 90 s on each flight <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> first<br />
level <strong>of</strong> competition and 180 s on each flight <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> second level [8]. The benefit <strong>of</strong> this method is that it<br />
allows <strong>for</strong> testing <strong>of</strong> both hardware and s<strong>of</strong>tware exactly as <strong>the</strong>y will be used in <strong>the</strong> real lunar mission.<br />
22