26.12.2012 Views

Development of a Cold Gas Propulsion System for the ... - SSL - MIT

Development of a Cold Gas Propulsion System for the ... - SSL - MIT

Development of a Cold Gas Propulsion System for the ... - SSL - MIT

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

2 <strong>Propulsion</strong> <strong>System</strong> Architecture<br />

Although most major architecture decisions <strong>for</strong> TALARIS were made be<strong>for</strong>e <strong>the</strong> work described in this<br />

<strong>the</strong>sis began, it is useful to discuss o<strong>the</strong>r approaches <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> propulsion <strong>of</strong> prototype or simulator<br />

landers and exploration vehicles. For one thing, a brief review <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> spacecraft emulator propulsion<br />

system was conducted be<strong>for</strong>e detailed design work began, to ensure that <strong>the</strong> decisions made <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

original concept were still valid even though <strong>the</strong> TALARIS design had evolved in o<strong>the</strong>r areas.<br />

Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore, understanding <strong>the</strong> strengths and weaknesses <strong>of</strong> cold gas propulsion compared to <strong>the</strong><br />

o<strong>the</strong>r options that might have been selected provides insight into <strong>the</strong> design decisions made.<br />

2.1 Vehicles O<strong>the</strong>r Than TALARIS<br />

Since hopping is not a common method <strong>of</strong> exploring planetary surfaces, <strong>the</strong>re is little precedent <strong>for</strong><br />

prototype or testbed vehicles built <strong>for</strong> this purpose. The closest analogues to TALARIS are Earth-based<br />

lunar lander testing vehicles. Several different concepts have been developed <strong>for</strong> vehicles <strong>of</strong> this type,<br />

but <strong>the</strong>y all face <strong>the</strong> problem <strong>of</strong> predicting lunar per<strong>for</strong>mance from tests per<strong>for</strong>med on Earth. From a<br />

propulsion perspective, <strong>the</strong> major difference between Earth and <strong>the</strong> Moon is gravity; about six times<br />

more <strong>for</strong>ce is needed to lift an object on <strong>the</strong> Earth as compared to lifting an object <strong>of</strong> equal mass on <strong>the</strong><br />

Moon. The atmosphere on Earth also introduces <strong>for</strong>ces that are not present on <strong>the</strong> Moon, but <strong>the</strong><br />

effects <strong>of</strong> wind can be mitigated by operating on calm days or even indoors, and drag <strong>for</strong>ces <strong>for</strong> most<br />

vehicles are small compared to <strong>the</strong> <strong>for</strong>ces needed to overcome gravity and to accelerate <strong>the</strong> vehicle <strong>for</strong><br />

horizontal transit.<br />

One approach to testing a lunar vehicle on <strong>the</strong> Earth is to simply operate <strong>the</strong> system as designed <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

Moon, as long as it is powerful enough to operate in <strong>the</strong> higher gravity <strong>of</strong> Earth. Mission pr<strong>of</strong>iles may be<br />

scaled in terms <strong>of</strong> distance or time such that <strong>the</strong>y use an equivalent amount <strong>of</strong> delta-V <strong>for</strong> a scaled flight<br />

on Earth as <strong>the</strong>y would <strong>for</strong> actual operations on <strong>the</strong> Moon. This was <strong>the</strong> approach taken <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

Northrop Grumman Lunar Lander Challenge, <strong>for</strong> which <strong>the</strong> goal was to simulate a descent from lunar<br />

orbit, refueling, and return to lunar orbit [7]. An equivalent task <strong>for</strong> demonstration on Earth was<br />

designed to involve taking <strong>of</strong>f from a concrete pad, ascending to an altitude <strong>of</strong> approximately 50 m,<br />

flying 50 m horizontally, and landing on a second concrete pad, with refueling and a return flight within<br />

two hours and fifteen minutes. The vehicle had to remain al<strong>of</strong>t <strong>for</strong> at least 90 s on each flight <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> first<br />

level <strong>of</strong> competition and 180 s on each flight <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> second level [8]. The benefit <strong>of</strong> this method is that it<br />

allows <strong>for</strong> testing <strong>of</strong> both hardware and s<strong>of</strong>tware exactly as <strong>the</strong>y will be used in <strong>the</strong> real lunar mission.<br />

22

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!