26.12.2012 Views

Ecclesiastes - GA Barton - 1908.pdf

Ecclesiastes - GA Barton - 1908.pdf

Ecclesiastes - GA Barton - 1908.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

58<br />

ECCLESIASTES<br />

WISDOM. QOHELETH.<br />

2 7 . Let us fill ourselves with 9 7 . Drink<br />

thy wine with a glad<br />

costly wine and ointments, and let heart,<br />

no flowers of spring pass us by.<br />

2. Let us crown/ourselves with 9. At all times let thy garments<br />

rosebuds before they be withered. be white, and let not oil be lacking<br />

for thy head.<br />

2 9 . Let none of us be without a 3 22 . For that is his portion,<br />

share in ^ur wanton revelry, every- 5 18 . For that is his lot.<br />

whepe let us leave tokens of our 9 8 . For it is thy lot in life,<br />

mifth, for this is our portion and<br />

this is our lot.<br />

As Qoheleth is the only Jewish writer known to us who cham-<br />

pions such sentiments, there can be little doubt that this polemic<br />

is directed against him. It is true that in the following verses the<br />

author of Wisdom denounces oppressions which Qoheleth nowhere<br />

countenances and couples them with these false doctrines; that<br />

does not, however, prove that his shafts are not aimed at Qoheleth,<br />

for it has in all ages been one of the methods of theological warfare<br />

to hold the opinions of heretics responsible for the most immoral<br />

practices.<br />

13.<br />

DATE AND AUTHORSHIP.<br />

It has been shown above (5) that the Solomonic authorship of<br />

<strong>Ecclesiastes</strong>, denied by Luther in the sixteenth century, and by<br />

Grotius in the seventeenth, was in the nineteenth century demonstrated<br />

by scholarly interpreters to be impossible. The fact that<br />

Solomon is not the author, but is introduced in a literary figure, has<br />

become such an axiom of the present-day interpretation of the<br />

book, that no extended argument is necessary to it. prove No one<br />

at all familiar with the course of religious thought in Israel, as sci-<br />

entific historical study has accurately portrayed it, could for a<br />

moment ascribe the work to Solomon. The language of the book<br />

also strongly reinforces the argument drawn from the thought. It<br />

belongs to the latest stage of linguistic development represented in<br />

the Old Testament. As shown above (10) not only are older<br />

Hebrew forms and constructions changed or confused, but late<br />

developments kindred to those of the Mishna are present, Aramaic

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!