26.12.2012 Views

Ecclesiastes - GA Barton - 1908.pdf

Ecclesiastes - GA Barton - 1908.pdf

Ecclesiastes - GA Barton - 1908.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

26<br />

ECCLESIASTES<br />

leaves, 6 8<br />

~7 22 and 2C 9<br />

on the fifteenth and ; sixteenth, 4 ~5 8 on ; the seven-<br />

teenth, io 16-n 6 and 5<br />

; on the eighteenth, 7 23 -8 5a ; on the nineteenth (end<br />

of the third fascicle), io 2' 15 and i4 b ; on the twentieth, p 3 - 10 ; on the twenty-<br />

first and probably the twenty-second, n 7 -i2 8 .<br />

The string which held these fascicles together broke and the middle<br />

fascicle fell out. The leaves were found by some one not qualified to put<br />

them together, who took the inner half of the second fascicle, folded it<br />

inside out, and then laid it in the new order immediately after the first<br />

fascicle. Next came the inner sheet of the third fascicle, followed by<br />

the outside half of the second, into the middle of which the two double<br />

leaves, 13, 18, 14, 17 had already been inserted. Although the fourth<br />

fascicle kept its it place, did not escape confusion, for between its leaves<br />

the first two leaves of the remaining sheet of the third fascicle found a<br />

place. Finally, leaf 17, becoming separated from its new environment,<br />

found a resting place between 19 and 21. This dislocation removed<br />

from the work all traces of its plan.<br />

In the new form it frequently happened that some of the edges did<br />

not join properly a fact which led in time to the insertion of glosses.<br />

From this dislocated archetype all extant texts of Qoheleth have de-<br />

scended.<br />

If now the original order of the leaves be restored and the glosses re-<br />

moved, the work falls into two distinct halves, a speculative and a practical,<br />

each distinguished from the other by its own appropriate character-<br />

istics. According to Bickell this first half consisted of the following:<br />

Ch. i 1 -2 11<br />

5 9 -6 7<br />

3 9<br />

~4 8 2 12b - 18 - 26 - 12a - l3 - 17 3 1 - 8 86 - 14 - 16a - 17a - I6b - 17b o 1 - 3 815 Qii-is I0 i 6 8 - 10 -i 2 . In this part it is demonstrated that life is an<br />

empty round, and that wisdom only serves to make its possessor modest,<br />

so that he does not get on as well as the vainly boasting fool.<br />

Part two consisted of the following: Ch. 7 la lo 1<br />

11. 12. 21. 2J. 20. 49-17<br />

ct-8 IO 16-20<br />

j^l-3.<br />

jO 14a - 15 - 14b Q3-10 ij7-10a I2 la ijlOb I2 lb-6. 8_<br />

7 lb -6 6 9 7 -10 - 18 -19-<br />

7<br />

6. 4. 5 *23-29 gl-4 JQ2-13 n!5 f(g\<br />

In this part the advice of Qoheleth is, in view of the fact that life offers<br />

no positive good, to make the best of such advantages as we have, to<br />

live modestly before the ruler and before God, and to expect everything<br />

to be vanity.<br />

The epilogue Bickell thought was from a later hand. This<br />

elaborate theory, rejected by most scholars, as too ingenious and<br />

improbable, has been accepted in full by Dillon, who sought in his<br />

Skeptics of the Old Testament, 1895, to commend it to English<br />

readers. The theory is not only intricate and elaborate to a de-<br />

a modern scholar<br />

gree which creates doubts that, if it were true,<br />

would ever have divined it, but it breaks down archaeologically<br />

in

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!