26.12.2012 Views

Ecclesiastes - GA Barton - 1908.pdf

Ecclesiastes - GA Barton - 1908.pdf

Ecclesiastes - GA Barton - 1908.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

l6o ECCLESIASTES<br />

state of nothingness. 5. For the living know that they shall die].<br />

The clause presents a reason for the statement of the preceding<br />

verse, but the reason betrays a strange mood of pessimism. The<br />

dead know not anything. To have power to perceive that one<br />

must die is to be greater than the dead, who have no knowledge.<br />

their<br />

Qoheleth's eschatology is that of Ps. 88 10 and ii5 17 . For<br />

memory is forgotten].<br />

That a dead man would be forgotten seems<br />

to have been taken for granted by the Hebrews, cf. Ps. 9 6<br />

3i 12<br />

41 5 .<br />

This fact constitutes for Qoheleth one of the great tragedies of<br />

life, cf. i 11 2 16 . This verse is quoted and opposed in Wisd. 2 4 .<br />

6. Their love as well as their hate and their jealousy have already<br />

perished]. The strongest passions are hushed in the calm of death.<br />

No portion forever . . . under the sun]. The dead are denied<br />

participation in the only world of which Qoheleth knows,<br />

his mind makes the pathos of death a tragedy.<br />

this to<br />

9 2 . SDH]. See on vs. i. iirw], (&, S and U apparently read i^ao (cf.<br />

McN. 149). This is rightly followed by Zap. and McN., and has been<br />

adopted above. aitoS] is a supernumerary in the text. Gins, held that<br />

it was introduced before "nnaV and NEB 1<br />

? to show that these referred to<br />

moral, not ceremonial, qualities; it not only makes awkward Heb., but the<br />

moral qualities have been included in the preceding pair. &, H and A<br />

added jnS to make another balanced pair, but < omits JiaV altogether, and<br />

is rightly followed by Bick., Wild, and Sieg.<br />

(& has apparently preserved<br />

many pre-Aqiban readings in this passage, and this one has been adopted<br />

above. &n> ..... 21t3 ^], for rhetorical effect the structure of the last<br />

two pairs is varied. 3. Soa jn]. Kn., Hit., Gins., Ew. and Del. take this<br />

as a way of expressing the superlative, comparing Jos. I4 15<br />

Ju. 6 15 and<br />

Ct. i 8 . Wr. points out, however, that in these cases the adj. is accom-<br />

panied by the article, and that this is really parallel to Ob. 2 and La. i 1<br />

,<br />

where the adjs. do not have the art., and where it is doubtful whether<br />

the writers intended to express a superlative or not. ins mpn], cf.<br />

on 2 14 and 9 2 . xSn] may, as Del. and Wr. note, be either an adj. or a<br />

verb, but is probably a verb. Everywhere, except in Je. 6", it takes an<br />

ace. of material as here, cf. Dt. 6U 33 23<br />

34 s . mSSm], cf. on i 17 . Perhaps<br />

to be pointed rnSSin. innx],

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!