26.12.2012 Views

Ecclesiastes - GA Barton - 1908.pdf

Ecclesiastes - GA Barton - 1908.pdf

Ecclesiastes - GA Barton - 1908.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

REFLECTIONS ON DESPOTISM [CH.8'- 151<br />

Qoheleth illustrates the powerlessness of man to know the future<br />

by examples of his powerlessness in other respects. He cannot<br />

control the winds. The wind is one of God's grandest creations<br />

(Am. 4 13<br />

), and a symbol of his power (Na. i 3<br />

),<br />

4<br />

which is in his own hands (Pr. 3o ).<br />

the control of<br />

Nor is he ruler in the day of<br />

death}, a second example of man's powerlessness. Nor is there<br />

6 - 8<br />

This statement seems to contradict Dt. 2o<br />

furlough in war].<br />

25*. According to i Mac. 3 58<br />

Judas Maccabseus conformed to<br />

one of these laws. John Hyrcanus (135-104 B.C.) employed<br />

foreign mercenaries (cf. Jos. Ant. xiii, 8 4<br />

). No soldier in such<br />

ranks could obtain a discharge when his employer had a war on<br />

hand. Such mercenaries had been employed freely in Egypt<br />

from the time of the XXVIth dynasty (cf. Breasted's History<br />

of Egypt, p. 569 ff.}, and by the Persians in all periods of their<br />

history; so that it was in Qoheleth's day no new thing. The<br />

allusion is probably to such soldiers, and thus becomes a third<br />

illustration of Qoheleth's point. 9. All this I have seeri\,t\\e power<br />

of the despot described in vvs. 1-8. Applied my heart to all the<br />

work], thoughtfully considered, or investigated. When man has<br />

power over man to his hurt]. This is an apt description of the in-<br />

justices of an Oriental despotism. Such injustice has existed<br />

under every Oriental monarchy, the allusion accordingly affords<br />

no clue to the date.<br />

" To his hurt " is ambiguous. (&, & and ,<br />

which are followed by Kn., Gins., Z6., Del. and Wild., make it<br />

refer to the second man. 2 and Hitzig and Ha. take it to refer<br />

to the first man. The first of these views is the correct one. The<br />

retribution to which allusion is made at the end of vs. 9 is often<br />

delayed, and meantime the subjects of the tyrant suffer.<br />

8 l . oonna] for the more common DSHD. The full writing of the article<br />

occurs not infrequently in later Hebrew, cf. Ges. K -<br />

3Sn. ~^o], an<br />

Aram, loan word, occurring only here in BH., but frequently in Aram.<br />

(cf. Dn. 2 4 - 5 - 6 - 7 - 9 - 16 - 24 - 25 - 26 - 30 - 36 45 4 - 6 - 15 - 16 - 21<br />

A s 12 - 16 , etc. "'3"'] here<br />

= " thing," "matter," as in i 8 8 and .<br />

7 I^D "^n], cf. Nu. 6 25 Ps. 4*<br />

Job 29 2< Pr. i6 15 25<br />

and BS. I3 (Heb.) for -\w with O'rp, Ps. 199. D'JD Tj?].<br />

The Versions read T>? the adj., not tj? the noun. This should be<br />

adopted. It is used of "shamelessness," "impudence,"<br />

ness," cf. Dt. 2850 Pr. 7 13 2i Dn. 8 23 . N.4&"]<br />

verbs are often confused in the later books, cf. Ges.K-<br />

or "coarse-<br />

for n:\ N"S and n'"><br />

75rr and 2 K.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!