National Register of Historic Places Continuation Sheet
National Register of Historic Places Continuation Sheet National Register of Historic Places Continuation Sheet
NPS Form 10-900-A OMB Approval No. 1024-0018 (8-86) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Continuation Sheet Section Number: __7_ Page: 46 Geneva-Minnesota Historic District, Medford, OR date of construction and current integrity and ability to relate the districts periods of significance. Resources built during either of the twin development phases of the Geneva-Minnesota District (1911-1914 and 1922-1924) were ranked as "Primary." Historically signfiicant resources built outside of those periods were ranked "Secondary." Resource classfications reflect an approach based upon the following systematic method: Primary Contributing: Resources built between 1911-1914 or 1922-1924 (inclusive) which retain sufficient integrity to their historic period to reflect the period of significance. 25 of the district's 39 resources are so ranked. Secondary Contributing: Resources that were built outside of the two periods of significance which reflect their historic character and contribute to the integrity of the district. 5 of the districts 39 resources, ranging in construction date from 1896 to 1929 are so ranked. HistoricYNon-Contributing in Current Condition: Resources which although built during the periods of significance have been altered in such a way that they no longer reflect their historic character nor contribute to the integrity of the district. 2 of the district's 39 resources are so classified and could potentially, with appropriate restoration, could potentially re-classified as contributing resources. CompatibIe\Non-Historic\Non-Contributing: Non-historic resources that are compatible with the character of district but to not contribute to character of the district. None of the 39 resources within the district is so designated. Non-Compatible\Non-Contributing: Resources tht are either so substantially altered that its historic character is irretreivable or non-historic construction thatn does not conform in scale, materials, or siting to the character of the district. 2 of the district's 39 resources, built 1957-1976, are so designated.
NPS Form 10-900-A 0MB Approval No. 1024-0018 (8-86) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Continuation Sheet Section Number: _7_ Page: 47 Geneva-Minnesota Historic District, Medford, OR Auxiliary structures within the district, in all cases garages associated with the dominant resource, have been surveyed and noted in the individual building statements. As per the "Guidelines for Counting" of National Register Bulletin 14, none of these structures are of the requiste size and scale for individual resource listing. SUMMARY: The thirty-nine individual resources of the Geneva-Minnesota District, including thirty-eight structures and the unifying Geneva Roadbed, represent a homogenous residential neighborhood that accurately reflects the development history of Medford east of Bear Creek that occurred in the first quarter of the 20th century. Constructed essentially in two phases, the first focused along Geneva Street and employing the Bungalow and Craftsman architectural styles, the second, focused on Minnesota, using the historic period styles popular in the 1920s, the Geneva- Minnesota District as a whole retains high integrity in workmanship, setting, use of materials and overall character. The Geneva-Minnesota District successfully relates its periods of development and the associations for which it is significant, containing one of the best collections of the major residential architecture styles that were employed in Medford during the 1911 and 1923 periods.
- Page 1 and 2: NPS Form 10-900 (Oct. 1990) United
- Page 3 and 4: NFS Form 10-900-A 0MB Approval No.
- Page 5 and 6: NPS Form 10-900-A 0MB Approval No.
- Page 7 and 8: NPS Form 10-900-A OMB Approval No.
- Page 9 and 10: NPS Form 10-900-A 0MB Approval No.
- Page 11 and 12: NPSForm10-900-A United States Depar
- Page 13 and 14: NPSForm10-900-A United States Depar
- Page 15 and 16: NPSForm 10-900-A United States Depa
- Page 17 and 18: NFS Form 10-900-A OMB Approval No.
- Page 19 and 20: NPS Form 10-900-A OMB Approval No.
- Page 21 and 22: NPSForm10-900-A United States Depar
- Page 23 and 24: NPS Form 10-900-A OMB Approval No.
- Page 25 and 26: NPSForm10-900-A United States Depar
- Page 27 and 28: NPS Form 10-900-A 0MB Approval No.
- Page 29 and 30: NPSForm10-900-A United States Depar
- Page 31 and 32: NPS Form 10-900-A OMB Approval No.
- Page 33 and 34: NPSForm10-900-A United States Depar
- Page 35 and 36: NPS Forml 0-900-A United States Dep
- Page 37 and 38: NPSForm10-900-A United States Depar
- Page 39 and 40: NPSForm10-900-A United States Depar
- Page 41 and 42: NPSForm10-900-A United States Depar
- Page 43 and 44: NPS Form 10-900-A 0MB Approval No.
- Page 45 and 46: NPS Form 10-900-A 0MB Approval No.
- Page 47: NPS Form 10-900-A OMB Approval No.
- Page 51 and 52: NPS Form 10-900-A 0MB Approval No.
- Page 53 and 54: NPS Form 10-900-A OMB Approval No.
- Page 55 and 56: NFS Form 10-900-A 0MB Approval No.
- Page 57 and 58: NPS Form 10-900-A OMB Approval No.
- Page 59 and 60: NPS Form 10-900-A 0MB Approval No.
- Page 61 and 62: NPS Form 10-900-A 0MB Approval No.
- Page 63 and 64: NFS Form 10-900-A 0MB Approval No.
- Page 65 and 66: NPS Form 10-900-A OMB Approval No.
- Page 67 and 68: NPS Form 10-900-A 0MB Approval No.
- Page 69 and 70: CO Id niiiiiirm/mis /wry*, 'I / / /
- Page 71 and 72: Q 258 P 260 ID- U- 8 __ i* -vo SHER
- Page 73 and 74: 4O3 J C CD 423 c: a-, —J SKE-RMAH
- Page 75 and 76: NPSForm10-900-A OMB Approval No. 10
- Page 77 and 78: NPS Form 10-900-A 0MB Approval No.
- Page 79 and 80: NPS Form 10-900-A 0MB Approval No.
- Page 81: NPSForm10-900-A 0MB Approval No. 10
NPS Form 10-900-A 0MB Approval No. 1024-0018 (8-86)<br />
United States Department <strong>of</strong> the Interior<br />
<strong>National</strong> Park Service<br />
<strong>National</strong> <strong>Register</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Historic</strong> <strong>Places</strong><br />
<strong>Continuation</strong> <strong>Sheet</strong><br />
Section Number: _7_ Page: 47 Geneva-Minnesota <strong>Historic</strong> District, Medford, OR<br />
Auxiliary structures within the district, in all cases garages associated with the dominant resource,<br />
have been surveyed and noted in the individual building statements. As per the "Guidelines for<br />
Counting" <strong>of</strong> <strong>National</strong> <strong>Register</strong> Bulletin 14, none <strong>of</strong> these structures are <strong>of</strong> the requiste size and<br />
scale for individual resource listing.<br />
SUMMARY:<br />
The thirty-nine individual resources <strong>of</strong> the Geneva-Minnesota District, including thirty-eight<br />
structures and the unifying Geneva Roadbed, represent a homogenous residential neighborhood<br />
that accurately reflects the development history <strong>of</strong> Medford east <strong>of</strong> Bear Creek that occurred in<br />
the first quarter <strong>of</strong> the 20th century. Constructed essentially in two phases, the first focused along<br />
Geneva Street and employing the Bungalow and Craftsman architectural styles, the second,<br />
focused on Minnesota, using the historic period styles popular in the 1920s, the Geneva-<br />
Minnesota District as a whole retains high integrity in workmanship, setting, use <strong>of</strong> materials and<br />
overall character. The Geneva-Minnesota District successfully relates its periods <strong>of</strong> development<br />
and the associations for which it is significant, containing one <strong>of</strong> the best collections <strong>of</strong> the major<br />
residential architecture styles that were employed in Medford during the 1911 and 1923 periods.
Change language