National Register of Historic Places Continuation Sheet
National Register of Historic Places Continuation Sheet
National Register of Historic Places Continuation Sheet
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
NPS Form 10-900-A OMB Approval No. 1024-0018 (8-86)<br />
United States Department <strong>of</strong> the Interior<br />
<strong>National</strong> Park Service<br />
<strong>National</strong> <strong>Register</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Historic</strong> <strong>Places</strong><br />
<strong>Continuation</strong> <strong>Sheet</strong><br />
Section Number: __7_ Page: 46 Geneva-Minnesota <strong>Historic</strong> District, Medford, OR<br />
date <strong>of</strong> construction and current integrity and ability to relate the districts periods <strong>of</strong> significance.<br />
Resources built during either <strong>of</strong> the twin development phases <strong>of</strong> the Geneva-Minnesota District<br />
(1911-1914 and 1922-1924) were ranked as "Primary." <strong>Historic</strong>ally signfiicant resources built<br />
outside <strong>of</strong> those periods were ranked "Secondary." Resource classfications reflect an approach<br />
based upon the following systematic method:<br />
Primary Contributing:<br />
Resources built between 1911-1914 or 1922-1924 (inclusive) which<br />
retain sufficient integrity to their historic period to reflect the period<br />
<strong>of</strong> significance. 25 <strong>of</strong> the district's 39 resources are so ranked.<br />
Secondary Contributing:<br />
Resources that were built outside <strong>of</strong> the two periods <strong>of</strong> significance<br />
which reflect their historic character and contribute to the integrity<br />
<strong>of</strong> the district. 5 <strong>of</strong> the districts 39 resources, ranging in<br />
construction date from 1896 to 1929 are so ranked.<br />
<strong>Historic</strong>YNon-Contributing in Current Condition:<br />
Resources which although built during the periods <strong>of</strong> significance<br />
have been altered in such a way that they no longer reflect their<br />
historic character nor contribute to the integrity <strong>of</strong> the district. 2 <strong>of</strong><br />
the district's 39 resources are so classified and could potentially,<br />
with appropriate restoration, could potentially re-classified as<br />
contributing resources.<br />
CompatibIe\Non-<strong>Historic</strong>\Non-Contributing:<br />
Non-historic resources that are compatible with the character <strong>of</strong><br />
district but to not contribute to character <strong>of</strong> the district. None <strong>of</strong><br />
the 39 resources within the district is so designated.<br />
Non-Compatible\Non-Contributing:<br />
Resources tht are either so substantially altered that its historic<br />
character is irretreivable or non-historic construction thatn does not<br />
conform in scale, materials, or siting to the character <strong>of</strong> the district.<br />
2 <strong>of</strong> the district's 39 resources, built 1957-1976, are so designated.