Feng, Xiaodong_ Xie, Hong-Guang - Applying pharmacogenomics in therapeutics-CRC Press (2016)
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
278 Applying Pharmacogenomics in Therapeutics
HER2 and Trastuzumab
Human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2) was identified as a potential
monoclonal antibody target in the early 1980s, and thereafter the humanized
IgG1 monoclonal antibody trastuzumab moved into clinical trials in 1992 and was
approved by the US FDA as Herceptin in 1998 and by the EMEA’s centralized procedure
in 2000, respectively. Herceptin, specifically developed to target the receptor
HER2 and to cause cell death, is an anticancer target therapy for use in patients with
breast cancer who are HER2-positive. Genetic testing helps identify overexpression
of HER2. There are two different commercial testing kits currently available in the
market: one is immunohistochemistry (IHC) testing (which detects overexpression
of HER2 protein/antigen in breast cancer tissue) and the other is cytogenetic fluorescent
in situ hybridization (FISH) testing (which detects amplification of the gene
encoding the HER2), both of which have been approved by the US FDA for detection
of HER2 overexpression. The use of the HER2 testing has been required in the drug
labeling of trastuzumab treatment. In Europe (United Kingdom, Ireland, Germany,
and the Netherlands), HER2 testing was performed in approximately 84% of breast
cancer women who received trastuzumab treatment, indicating a larger consensus
on the clinical utility of HER2 testing in that clinical setting. 1 Because HER2 testing
service can identify who would be good responders to trastuzumab treatment, this
testing can reduce inefficacious use of trastuzumab in some breast cancer patients
before they receive that biologic. According to a multicenter survey in Europe, 1 the
clinical utility is perceived with a higher level of implementation of HER2 testing,
and the benefits of HER2 testing clearly outweigh its costs, as measured with cost
per life years gained, improved life expectancy, or the number of deaths averted. In
addition, HER2 is thought to be a biomarker that has both clinical validity and utility
due to significantly improved patient care. 14
HLA B*5701 and Abacavir Hypersensitivity
Abacavir, an HIV reverse transcriptase inhibitor, is often used in combination
with other antivirals in the treatment of HIV infection. Hypersensitivity reactions
to abacavir occur in approximately 5% of HIV-infected patients taking the drug,
which may result in potentially life-threatening hypotension if drug therapy is not
ceased. 34 Clinical research studies have also indicated that patients with the human
leukocyte antigen HLA B*5701 are at greater risk of a hypersensitivity reaction
to abacavir. 19,20 In terms of the higher prevalence of the HLA B*5701 (9–18%), an
established genotype–phenotype association, the low cost of HLA B*5701 testing
(e.g. $62), and the high cost to treat abacavir-induced hypersensitivity (e.g., $3730),
HLA B*5701 testing before drug therapy would be most likely in a cost-effective
fashion. 21 Another study also indicated that the ICE ratio of HLA genotyping was
cost savings of up to $32,500 per hypersensitivity reaction avoided. 16 Therefore,
HLA genotyping is considered cost-effective as anticipated, 21 according to a reasonable
cutoff value of less than US$50,000 per QALY gained. 7,9,10,17 Furthermore,
HLAB*5701 is considered to have both clinical validity and clinical utility, which
lead to improved patient outcomes. 14