21.12.2022 Views

Feng, Xiaodong_ Xie, Hong-Guang - Applying pharmacogenomics in therapeutics-CRC Press (2016)

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

278 Applying Pharmacogenomics in Therapeutics

HER2 and Trastuzumab

Human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2) was identified as a potential

monoclonal antibody target in the early 1980s, and thereafter the humanized

IgG1 monoclonal antibody trastuzumab moved into clinical trials in 1992 and was

approved by the US FDA as Herceptin in 1998 and by the EMEA’s centralized procedure

in 2000, respectively. Herceptin, specifically developed to target the receptor

HER2 and to cause cell death, is an anticancer target therapy for use in patients with

breast cancer who are HER2-positive. Genetic testing helps identify overexpression

of HER2. There are two different commercial testing kits currently available in the

market: one is immunohistochemistry (IHC) testing (which detects overexpression

of HER2 protein/antigen in breast cancer tissue) and the other is cytogenetic fluorescent

in situ hybridization (FISH) testing (which detects amplification of the gene

encoding the HER2), both of which have been approved by the US FDA for detection

of HER2 overexpression. The use of the HER2 testing has been required in the drug

labeling of trastuzumab treatment. In Europe (United Kingdom, Ireland, Germany,

and the Netherlands), HER2 testing was performed in approximately 84% of breast

cancer women who received trastuzumab treatment, indicating a larger consensus

on the clinical utility of HER2 testing in that clinical setting. 1 Because HER2 testing

service can identify who would be good responders to trastuzumab treatment, this

testing can reduce inefficacious use of trastuzumab in some breast cancer patients

before they receive that biologic. According to a multicenter survey in Europe, 1 the

clinical utility is perceived with a higher level of implementation of HER2 testing,

and the benefits of HER2 testing clearly outweigh its costs, as measured with cost

per life years gained, improved life expectancy, or the number of deaths averted. In

addition, HER2 is thought to be a biomarker that has both clinical validity and utility

due to significantly improved patient care. 14

HLA B*5701 and Abacavir Hypersensitivity

Abacavir, an HIV reverse transcriptase inhibitor, is often used in combination

with other antivirals in the treatment of HIV infection. Hypersensitivity reactions

to abacavir occur in approximately 5% of HIV-infected patients taking the drug,

which may result in potentially life-threatening hypotension if drug therapy is not

ceased. 34 Clinical research studies have also indicated that patients with the human

leukocyte antigen HLA B*5701 are at greater risk of a hypersensitivity reaction

to abacavir. 19,20 In terms of the higher prevalence of the HLA B*5701 (9–18%), an

established genotype–phenotype association, the low cost of HLA B*5701 testing

(e.g. $62), and the high cost to treat abacavir-induced hypersensitivity (e.g., $3730),

HLA B*5701 testing before drug therapy would be most likely in a cost-effective

fashion. 21 Another study also indicated that the ICE ratio of HLA genotyping was

cost savings of up to $32,500 per hypersensitivity reaction avoided. 16 Therefore,

HLA genotyping is considered cost-effective as anticipated, 21 according to a reasonable

cutoff value of less than US$50,000 per QALY gained. 7,9,10,17 Furthermore,

HLAB*5701 is considered to have both clinical validity and clinical utility, which

lead to improved patient outcomes. 14

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!