21.12.2022 Views

Feng, Xiaodong_ Xie, Hong-Guang - Applying pharmacogenomics in therapeutics-CRC Press (2016)

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

118 Applying Pharmacogenomics in Therapeutics

an EGFR mutation. However, the prevalence of EGFR mutations varies significantly

across ethnic groups, from 10% in the white population to more than 40% in Asian

populations (Lynch et al. 2004; Paez et al. 2004; Pao et al. 2004). In Asian NSCLC

cancer patients who were nonsmokers or only light smokers, this percentage can

be as high as 60%. For NSCLC with adenocarcinoma histology, the frequency for

EGFR mutation is about 10–20%, whereas the rate for squamous histology is about

1–15%. It is therefore recommended to test EGFR mutations for all nonsquamous

lung cancers, regardless of clinical characteristics.

The majority of EGFR mutations are located in the tyrosine kinase domain. The

two most frequent EGFR-activating mutations, p.L858R point mutation in exon

21 and small deletions in exon 19 (Del19), are responsible for about 90% of cases

(Ladanyi and Pao 2008). The less common or rare mutations (a varying frequency

of 1–3%) include p.L861Q mutation, a missense mutation at codon 719 (p.G719X,

about 3%) resulting in the substitution of the glycine at amino acid position 719

by a cysteine, alanine, or serine, and in-frame insertion mutations in exon 20. For

patients with a known frequent mutation (Del19 and p.L858R), treatment with an

EGFR-TKI, such as erlotinib, gefitinib, or afatinib, is a standard first-line therapy,

and multiple phase III trials showed that EGFR-TKI treatment has improved objective

response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and health-related quality

of life (HRQOL). However, the sensitivity to EGFR-TKI and PFS are globally lower

for patients with less frequent or rare EGFR mutations.

The use of advanced molecular profiling of EGFR mutation status for

patients with NSCLC to direct targeted therapy with the EGFR-TKIs significantly

improves the treatment of this disease. However, patients undergoing EGFR-TKI

treatments will eventually relapse by acquired resistance (progression after initial

benefit). Acquired resistance may arise from different mechanisms, including pharmacological,

biological, and evolutionary selection on molecularly diverse tumors.

Polymorphisms in the previously discussed drug transporters such as ABCB1

(1236T>C, 2677G>T/A, and 3435C>T) and BCRP (ABCG2, 421C>A) may be relevant

for the pharmacokinetics of the EGFR-TKIs. EGFR mutation heterogeneity

could also contribute to the relapse. The emergence of EGFR exon 20 p.T790M

mutation clones seems to be the most frequent mechanism for acquired resistance

(Pao et al. 2005). It seems that there is the presence of a minor subclone (about 1%)

of p.T790M mutation before treatment of EGFR-TKI is selected. Although patients

with the EGFR exon 20 p.T790M mutation are resistant to EGFR-TKI treatment,

the presence of this alteration predicts a favorable prognosis and indolent disease

course, compared to the absence of it after TKI failure. Mutation in the genes of

the downstream signaling cascade of the EGFR pathway is another mechanism

for acquired resistance of EGFR-TKIs. One example is the KRAS gene, which has

been implicated in the pathogenesis of several cancers. Mutations in the KRAS gene

result in a constitutively activated KRAS protein that continually triggers these

downstream signals. Although EGFR TKIs can block EGFR activation, they cannot

block the activity of the mutated KRAS protein. Thus, patients with KRAS mutations

tend to be resistant to erlotinib and gefitinib. KRAS mutations are more likely

found in adenocarcinoma patients who are smokers, and white patients, rather than

East Asians, and are prognostic for poor survival (Riely et al. 2009).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!