20.12.2022 Views

Book of Extended summaries ISDA

Book of Extended summaries ISDA

Book of Extended summaries ISDA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

sowing technique, plant protection measures, irrigation management and pre-sowing<br />

technique. Technology adoption <strong>of</strong> selected cool season vegetable practices <strong>of</strong> KAU by farmers<br />

in Idukki and Wayanad district was assessed using the formula developed by Singh and Singh<br />

(1967). The variables were studied and analyzed with the help <strong>of</strong> different statistical tools like<br />

mean, correlation, frequency percentage analysis, Kruskal Wallis test.<br />

Results<br />

On analyzing the data, adoption <strong>of</strong> components such as pre-sowing technique, fertilizer<br />

management and post-harvest technology were found to be higher in Wayanad district. This<br />

agrees with the findings <strong>of</strong> Malla (2018) and Kant (2019).<br />

The results <strong>of</strong> the adoption quotient revealed that majority <strong>of</strong> the farmers i.e., 48.89 per cent<br />

belonged to medium category <strong>of</strong> adoption, followed by 42.22 per cent and 8.89 per cent in low<br />

and high category respectively. The mean adoption quotient (AQ) was 218.53 with a maximum<br />

and minimum adoption quotient <strong>of</strong> 323 and 123 respectively.<br />

Generalizing the results, it was interesting to note that the highest need for technology (or the<br />

low technology availability) was reported for processing, storage and value addition for cool<br />

season vegetables unlike the perceived traditional requirements. Tones <strong>of</strong> produce are wasted<br />

at the field level itself due to lower market price, climatic variations, and perishability and<br />

perhaps due to lack <strong>of</strong> storage facilities. This is in line with the findings <strong>of</strong> Thomas (2015) and<br />

Basheer (2016).<br />

The major constraints faced by cool season vegetable growers were lack <strong>of</strong> flower<br />

setting/incomplete flower setting/discoloring/undesired shape <strong>of</strong> flower due to varying climatic<br />

conditions, followed by lack <strong>of</strong> knowledge <strong>of</strong> disease resistant varieties and lack <strong>of</strong> knowledge<br />

about post-harvest technologies.<br />

Conclusion<br />

From the above findings the following conclusions can be drawn in general that majority <strong>of</strong> the<br />

cool season vegetable growers had medium level <strong>of</strong> adoption <strong>of</strong> cool season vegetable<br />

cultivation technology. Technology needs for post-harvest handling as well as value addition<br />

is demanded by the growers. From the results obtained it can be observed that there is<br />

considerable room for improvement in production and marketing and for scaling up the<br />

production through suitable extension interventions. Tailor made strategies tare to be lined up<br />

inorder to enhance the adoption <strong>of</strong> cool season vegetable growers towards taking up agriculture<br />

as a pr<strong>of</strong>itable farming enterprise.<br />

Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts<br />

902 | Page

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!