Book of Extended summaries ISDA
Book of Extended summaries ISDA Book of Extended summaries ISDA
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad Results The weekly PASM values across various phenophases revealed that, crop experienced severe and moderate drought at all the phenophases of crop growth as shown in the table. Crop which experienced severe drought (6-16% PASM) at all phenophases recorded pod yield of 802 kg ha -1 , moderate drought (33-42% PASM) recorded 1151 kg ha -1 . While, the crop with mild drought (58-64% PASM) at vegetative, flowering, pegging and pod development stages produced pod yield of 1573 kg ha -1 , the crop with no drought (90-100% PASM) at all the phenophases recorded 1364 kg ha -1 pod yield. However, the crop did not experience mild drought at emergence, maturity and no drought at maturity stage. It was observed that the crop which experienced no drought at pegging recorded lower yield (1066 kg ha -1 ) compared to one which experienced, moderate drought (1296 kg ha -1 ) and mild drought (1400 kg ha -1 ). It indicates that the groundnut crop needs moderate to mild drought conditions (36-64% PASM) for development of effective pegs and higher soil moisture (95% PASM), low moisture (12% PASM) at this stage is detrimental to crop yield. Positive and significant correlation between soil moisture and pod yield of groundnut was also reported by Guled et al2013). Severe drought at pod development stage has reduced pod yield (661 kg ha -1 ) compared to moderate drought (962 kg ha -1 ), mild drought (1435 kg ha -1 ) and no drought has recorded higher pod yield (1517 kg ha -1 ). This clearly indicates the importance of adequate soil moisture at pod development, which is the most critical phenophase of groundnut to harvest higher pod yield under rainfed situation. Conclusion The analysis of percent available soil moisture and pod yield of groundnut revealed that, the crop was experiencing moderate drought during crop growth period in most of the years. The effect of severe drought was more under late sowing compared to normal sowing during 1 st and 2 nd FN of July. The crop subjected to mild drought during the crop growing period irrespective of the sowing environment and phenophases, produced higher pod yield compared to no drought and moderate drought condition. Moderate to mild drought at pegging and mild or no drought at pod development are having significant influence on pod yield of groundnut crop grown in Ananthapuramu district of Andhra Pradesh. References Anonymous. 2016. Manual for drought management. Department of Agriculture, Cooperation & Farmers Welfare, Ministry of Agriculture & Farmers Welfare Government of India. Pp 37-39. 807 | Page Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad Guled, P. M., Shekh, A. M., Patel, H. R. and Pandey V. 2013. Effect of soil moisture, evapotranspiration, stress degree days on pod yield of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L). J.of Agrometeorol. 15 (2): 135-137. Mean Pod yield of groundnut (kg ha -1 ) as influenced by PASM (%) at various Phenophase / PASM phenophases of groundnut (PASM values in parenthesis) Severe drought (25 and 50 and 75) Emergence 399 (16) 849 (42) - 1680 (92) 976 Vegetative 766 (15) 839 (40) 1999 (59) 1110 (99) 1179 Flowering 1147 (10) 1494 (42) 1459 (64) 1448 (100) 1387 Pegging 867 (12) 1296 (34) 1400 (58) 1066 (95) 1157 Pod Development 661 (8) 962 (36) 1435 (64) 1517 (90) 1144 Maturity 970 (6) 1464 (33) - - 1217 Mean 802 1151 1573 1364 1183 Mea n T6-05R-1195 An Impact Assessment of Agromet Advisory Service (AAS) for Sustainable Agriculture and Resilient Farm Income: Study of Farm Precise Mobile Application Nikhil Nikam 1* , Nitin Kumbhar 2 , Ajay Shelke 2 1 Watershed Organisation Trust (WOTR), Pune, Maharashtra 2 Sanjeevani Institute for Empowerment and Development (SIED), Aurangabad, Maharashtra * nikhil.nikam@wotr.org.in Agromet Advisory Services (AAS) are crucial for agricultural planning and adaptation responses. Earlier, farmers could predict the arrival of monsoons based on their past experiences; now, changing climate makes it challenging to make predictions based on experiences alone (Wang et al. 2022). Therefore, reliable forecasts of weather events are needed on short and long-time scales to minimize agriculture losses. Adopting technological innovations is one of the most promising and investigated ways to adapt to climate change (Lybbert and Sumner 2012). At the same time, it builds the capacity of communities and individuals to plan and implement adaptive responses in the face of changing climate. There are quite a few methods to disseminate the advisories to the farmers; however, Watershed Organisation Trust (WOTR) undertook an action research project where a mobile application was developed to provide farm-level agro-advisory services to farmers. This study was undertaken with objective to measure the impact of the FarmPrecise mobile app on reducing the climate-induced losses of agrarian communities through specific indicators. Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts 808 | Page
- Page 778 and 779: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 780 and 781: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 782 and 783: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 784 and 785: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 786 and 787: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 788 and 789: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 790 and 791: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 792 and 793: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 794 and 795: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 796 and 797: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 798 and 799: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 800 and 801: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 802 and 803: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 804 and 805: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 806 and 807: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 808 and 809: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 810 and 811: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 812 and 813: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 814 and 815: Theme- 6 Institutional and policy i
- Page 816 and 817: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 818 and 819: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 820 and 821: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 822 and 823: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 824 and 825: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 826 and 827: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 830 and 831: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 832 and 833: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 834 and 835: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 836 and 837: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 838 and 839: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 840 and 841: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 842 and 843: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 844 and 845: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 846 and 847: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 848 and 849: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 850 and 851: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 852 and 853: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 854 and 855: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 856 and 857: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 858 and 859: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 860 and 861: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 862 and 863: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 864 and 865: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 866 and 867: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 868 and 869: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 870 and 871: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 872 and 873: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 874 and 875: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 876 and 877: International Conference on Reimagi
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Results<br />
The weekly PASM values across various phenophases revealed that, crop experienced severe<br />
and moderate drought at all the phenophases <strong>of</strong> crop growth as shown in the table. Crop which<br />
experienced severe drought (6-16% PASM) at all phenophases recorded pod yield <strong>of</strong> 802 kg<br />
ha -1 , moderate drought (33-42% PASM) recorded 1151 kg ha -1 . While, the crop with mild<br />
drought (58-64% PASM) at vegetative, flowering, pegging and pod development stages<br />
produced pod yield <strong>of</strong> 1573 kg ha -1 , the crop with no drought (90-100% PASM) at all the<br />
phenophases recorded 1364 kg ha -1 pod yield. However, the crop did not experience mild<br />
drought at emergence, maturity and no drought at maturity stage.<br />
It was observed that the crop which experienced no drought at pegging recorded lower yield<br />
(1066 kg ha -1 ) compared to one which experienced, moderate drought (1296 kg ha -1 ) and mild<br />
drought (1400 kg ha -1 ). It indicates that the groundnut crop needs moderate to mild drought<br />
conditions (36-64% PASM) for development <strong>of</strong> effective pegs and higher soil moisture (95%<br />
PASM), low moisture (12% PASM) at this stage is detrimental to crop yield. Positive and<br />
significant correlation between soil moisture and pod yield <strong>of</strong> groundnut was also reported by<br />
Guled et al2013).<br />
Severe drought at pod development stage has reduced pod yield (661 kg ha -1 ) compared to<br />
moderate drought (962 kg ha -1 ), mild drought (1435 kg ha -1 ) and no drought has recorded higher<br />
pod yield (1517 kg ha -1 ). This clearly indicates the importance <strong>of</strong> adequate soil moisture at pod<br />
development, which is the most critical phenophase <strong>of</strong> groundnut to harvest higher pod yield<br />
under rainfed situation.<br />
Conclusion<br />
The analysis <strong>of</strong> percent available soil moisture and pod yield <strong>of</strong> groundnut revealed that, the<br />
crop was experiencing moderate drought during crop growth period in most <strong>of</strong> the years. The<br />
effect <strong>of</strong> severe drought was more under late sowing compared to normal sowing during 1 st and<br />
2 nd FN <strong>of</strong> July. The crop subjected to mild drought during the crop growing period irrespective<br />
<strong>of</strong> the sowing environment and phenophases, produced higher pod yield compared to no<br />
drought and moderate drought condition. Moderate to mild drought at pegging and mild or no<br />
drought at pod development are having significant influence on pod yield <strong>of</strong> groundnut crop<br />
grown in Ananthapuramu district <strong>of</strong> Andhra Pradesh.<br />
References<br />
Anonymous. 2016. Manual for drought management. Department <strong>of</strong> Agriculture, Cooperation<br />
& Farmers Welfare, Ministry <strong>of</strong> Agriculture & Farmers Welfare Government <strong>of</strong> India. Pp<br />
37-39.<br />
807 | Page Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts