20.12.2022 Views

Book of Extended summaries ISDA

Book of Extended summaries ISDA

Book of Extended summaries ISDA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Methodology<br />

The field experiment was conducted for two consecutive years (2013-14 and 2014-15) to<br />

evaluate the water use, yield and economic returns from maize under different irrigation<br />

schedules and nitrogen levels at S.V. Agricultural College, wet land farm, Tirupati, Andhra<br />

Pradesh. The experiment was laid out in split-plot design and replicated thrice. The treatments<br />

comprised <strong>of</strong> four main plots viz., M1 (drip irrigation at 0.7 IW/CPE ratio), M2 (drip irrigation<br />

at 0.8 IW/CPE ratio), M 3 (drip irrigation at 0.9 IW/CPE ratio) and M 4 (weekly check basin<br />

irrigation) and three sub plots viz., N 1 (160 kg N ha -1 ), N 2 (200 kg N ha -1 ) and N 3 (240 kg N<br />

ha -1 ). To schedule the drip irrigation at prescribed IW/CPE ratios the treatments were<br />

maintained to field capacity in the top 0-45 cm depth i.e. only effective root zone depth,<br />

whereas for check basin irrigation the depth <strong>of</strong> water was 50 cm.<br />

Results<br />

The study revealed that significantly, higher water use efficiency was recorded with irrigation<br />

through drip at 0.9 IW/CPE ratio, but the yield and economics <strong>of</strong> maize were found to be higher<br />

with weekly check basin method, which were on par to that obtained with drip irrigation at 0.9<br />

IW/CPE ratio (Table 1&2). With regard to nitrogen levels tried, water use efficiency, yield and<br />

economics were found to be superior with the nitrogen dose <strong>of</strong> 240 kg N ha -1 . This might be<br />

due to the better availability <strong>of</strong> nutrients under higher soil moisture and at high nitrogen<br />

conditions which might have increased the crop growth and translocation <strong>of</strong> photosynthates<br />

from source to sink. The benefit from per rupee investment, gross and net returns were higher<br />

with drip irrigation scheduled at 0.9 IW/CPE ratio.<br />

Water use and yield <strong>of</strong> maize as influenced by drip irrigation schedules and nitrogen<br />

levels<br />

Treatment<br />

M 1 : 0.7 IW/CPE under<br />

drip irrigation<br />

M 2 : 0.8 IW/CPE under<br />

drip irrigation<br />

M 3 : 0.9 IW/CPE under<br />

drip irrigation<br />

Water use efficiency<br />

(kg ha-mm -1 )<br />

Kernel yield (kg ha -1 )<br />

2013-14 2014-15 2013-14 2014-15<br />

Irrigation schedules<br />

11.7 12.2 2582 2717<br />

14.7 14.9 3774 3813<br />

16.4 16.5 4572 4525<br />

M 4 : Weekly check basin 12.9 12.4 4630 4724<br />

Nitrogen levels<br />

N 1 : 160 kg ha -1 11.5 11.8 3177 3289<br />

N 1 : 200 kg ha -1 14.9 14.7 4166 4170<br />

Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance<br />

77 | Page

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!