Book of Extended summaries ISDA

Book of Extended summaries ISDA Book of Extended summaries ISDA

20.12.2022 Views

International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad T 7 :T 3 + ST with Nano-DAP @ 2.5 ml/kg seed + FS with Nano-DAP @ 2 ml/lit at 30 DAT 100.33 166.31 4088 1.87 T 8 :T 3 + ST with Nano-DAP @ 5 ml/kg seed+ FS with Nano-DAP @ 2ml/lit at 30 DAT T 9 :T 4 + ST with Nano-DAP @ 2.5 ml/kg seed+ FS with Nano-DAP @ 2 ml/lit at 30 DAT T 10 :T 4 + ST with Nano-DAP @ 5 ml/kg seed+ FS with Nano-DAP @ 2ml/lit at 30 DAT T 11 :T 1 + SRD with Nano-DAP @ 0.5%+ FS with Nano-DAP @ 2ml/lit at 30 DAT T 12 :T 3 + SRD with Nano-DAP @ 0.5%+FS with Nano-DAP @ 2ml/lit at 30 DAT T 13 :T 4 +SRD with Nano-DAP @ 0.5%+ FS with Nano-DAP @ 2ml/lit at 30 DAT 100.43 169.25 4121 1.88 100.47 170.65 4213 1.91 101.03 170.92 4250 1.93 97.90 163.04 3889 1.86 98.83 165.43 3997 1.82 99.07 165.98 4033 1.80 CD at 5% 1.47 4.34 134 ST = Seed treatment, FS = Foliar spray, SRD = Seedlings root dipping, 100% NPK= 60:30:30kg/ha Effect of Nano-DAP on growth parameters, yield of rapeseed during 2021-22 Treatments Plant height (cm) Siliquas/ plant Seed yield (kg/ha) Benefitcost ratio T 1: N 0 P 0 K 100 (control) 85.03 41.96 603 1.84 T 2: N 100 P 100 K 100 (80:40:40 kg/ha) 93.37 56.07 752 1.89 T 3: N 0 P 0 K 100+ Nano DAP (ST @ 5ml/kg seed) 87.77 45.00 626 1.91 T 4: N 0 P 0 K 100 + Nano DAP (ST @ 10ml/kg seed) 88.19 46.53 633 1.93 T 5: N 0 P 0 K 100+ Nano DAP (FS @ 0.6% at 30 DAS) 90.92 48.60 670 1.90 T 6: N 0 P 0 K 100 + Nano DAP (ST @ 5ml/kg seed & FS @ 0.6% at 30 DAS) 91.46 51.13 679 1.92 T 7: N 75 P 75 K 100 + Nano DAP (FS @ 0.2% at 30 DAS) 93.22 58.76 738 1.90 T 8: N 75 P 75 K 100 + Nano DAP (ST @ 5 ml/ kg seed & FS @ 0.2% at 30 DAS) 95.95 60.90 767 1.97 T 9: N 50 P 50 K 100 + Nano DAP (FS @ 0.4% at 30 DAS) 92.18 53.40 693 1.82 T 10: N 50 P 50 K 100 + Nano DAP (ST @ 5ml/ kg seed & FS @ 0.4% at 30 DAS) 93.77 60.13 709 1.87 CD at 5% 2.71 1.21 15.7 ST = Seed treatment and FS = Foliar spray Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment 740 | Page

International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad T5-19P-1141 Effect of Nano Fertilizers on Growth Yield and Water Use Efficiency of Potato (Solanum tuberosum l.) under Varying Irrigation Schedules Manimala Mahato and Dhananjoy Dutta Department of Agronomy, Bidhan Chandra Krishi Viswavidyalaya, Mohanpur, Nadia, West Bengal, India 741252 Indiscriminate and over application of irrigation water and chemical fertilizers led to several detrimental effects on crop production system and environment. Therefore, introduction of nano fertilizers as an alternative source of conventional fertilizers has become a new area of research. Besides that, irrational irrigation to water demanding crop, like potato during the post monsoon season affects the growth and productivity. Therefore, a field experiment was delineated with the objective to assess the effect of nano fertilizers on growth, yield and water use efficiency of potato under various irrigation schedules based on cumulative pan evaporation (CPE). Methodology Field experiment was conducted at B.C.K.V. during rabi seasons of 2019-20 and 2020-21 in sandy loam alluvial soil (inceptisol) designed in split plot with three irrigation schedules at I 1- 15 mm, I 2-30 mm and I 3-45 mm of CPE kept as main plot treatments and five nutrient management practices like N1-100% RDF (200:150:150 kg/ha of N: P2O5: K2O), N2-75% RDF+ nano fertilizers (N, P, K at 80:40:40 ppm), N 3-100% RDF+ Nano-Zn (10 ppm), N 4-75% RDF+ nano fertilizers (N, P, K and Zn at 80:40:40:10 ppm) and N5-Nano-fertilizers (N, P, K at 80:40:40 ppm) as subplot treatments replicated thrice. All nano fertilizers were applied as foliar spray at 25 and 50 DAP. Potato (variety Kufri Himalini) was planted in 60 cm ×15 cm spacing during middle of November in 4.8 m × 3 m plot along with other standard package of practices. Results Pooled result reported that irrigation at 15 mm CPE along with 100% RDF and Nano-Zn (10 ppm) (I 1N 3) treatments recorded significantly higher plant height (61.76 cm) at 60 DAP, dry matter accumulation (579.85 g m -2 ) at 90 DAP, tuber no per hill (8.59) and tuber yield (23.04 t ha -1 ). In all cases lower values were obtained from irrigation at 45 mm CPE with nano fertilizers (N, P, K) alone treatment (I 3N 5). However, irrigation at 45 CPE along with 100% RDF and Nano-Zn (10 ppm) (I3N3) treatment recorded higher water use efficiency (9.96 kg m -3 ). 741 | Page Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment

International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

T5-19P-1141<br />

Effect <strong>of</strong> Nano Fertilizers on Growth Yield and Water Use Efficiency <strong>of</strong><br />

Potato (Solanum tuberosum l.) under Varying Irrigation Schedules<br />

Manimala Mahato and Dhananjoy Dutta<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Agronomy, Bidhan Chandra Krishi Viswavidyalaya,<br />

Mohanpur, Nadia, West Bengal, India 741252<br />

Indiscriminate and over application <strong>of</strong> irrigation water and chemical fertilizers led to several<br />

detrimental effects on crop production system and environment. Therefore, introduction <strong>of</strong><br />

nano fertilizers as an alternative source <strong>of</strong> conventional fertilizers has become a new area <strong>of</strong><br />

research. Besides that, irrational irrigation to water demanding crop, like potato during the post<br />

monsoon season affects the growth and productivity. Therefore, a field experiment was<br />

delineated with the objective to assess the effect <strong>of</strong> nano fertilizers on growth, yield and water<br />

use efficiency <strong>of</strong> potato under various irrigation schedules based on cumulative pan<br />

evaporation (CPE).<br />

Methodology<br />

Field experiment was conducted at B.C.K.V. during rabi seasons <strong>of</strong> 2019-20 and 2020-21 in<br />

sandy loam alluvial soil (inceptisol) designed in split plot with three irrigation schedules at I 1-<br />

15 mm, I 2-30 mm and I 3-45 mm <strong>of</strong> CPE kept as main plot treatments and five nutrient<br />

management practices like N1-100% RDF (200:150:150 kg/ha <strong>of</strong> N: P2O5: K2O), N2-75%<br />

RDF+ nano fertilizers (N, P, K at 80:40:40 ppm), N 3-100% RDF+ Nano-Zn (10 ppm), N 4-75%<br />

RDF+ nano fertilizers (N, P, K and Zn at 80:40:40:10 ppm) and N5-Nano-fertilizers (N, P, K<br />

at 80:40:40 ppm) as subplot treatments replicated thrice. All nano fertilizers were applied as<br />

foliar spray at 25 and 50 DAP. Potato (variety Kufri Himalini) was planted in 60 cm ×15 cm<br />

spacing during middle <strong>of</strong> November in 4.8 m × 3 m plot along with other standard package <strong>of</strong><br />

practices.<br />

Results<br />

Pooled result reported that irrigation at 15 mm CPE along with 100% RDF and Nano-Zn (10<br />

ppm) (I 1N 3) treatments recorded significantly higher plant height (61.76 cm) at 60 DAP, dry<br />

matter accumulation (579.85 g m -2 ) at 90 DAP, tuber no per hill (8.59) and tuber yield (23.04<br />

t ha -1 ). In all cases lower values were obtained from irrigation at 45 mm CPE with nano<br />

fertilizers (N, P, K) alone treatment (I 3N 5). However, irrigation at 45 CPE along with 100%<br />

RDF and Nano-Zn (10 ppm) (I3N3) treatment recorded higher water use efficiency (9.96 kg m -3 ).<br />

741 | Page Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!