Book of Extended summaries ISDA
Book of Extended summaries ISDA Book of Extended summaries ISDA
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad T5-17P-1117 Effect of Mechanization Practices on Economics of Soyabean-Safflower Cropping System S. A. Shinde*, P. O. Bhutada and S. B. Ghuge All India Coordinate Research Project on Safflower, Vasantrao Naik Marathwada Krishi Vidyapeeth Parbhani, Maharashtra, India. * santoshashinde338@gmail.com Oilseed crops are the second most important determinant of an agricultural economy, next only to cereals within the segment of field crops. Among oilseeds Safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) is an important oilseed crop with 35-40 % oil. It has been used as a source of edible oil and dying since ancient times. Effective use of agriculture machinery helps to increase productivity and production of output and undertake timely farm operations. This judicious use of time, labour, and resources facilitate sustainable intensification and is timely. Planting of crops, leading to an increase in productivity. Hence Mechanical power has become more economical and indispensable to meet targets of timeliness and efficient utilization of natural resources and inputs (Srinivasarao et al., 2013) Mechanization in safflower crop will help to timely field operations and easy harvesting and save huge cost of cultivation and sort the labour problem of the farmer. This study is therefore carried out to determine suitable mechanization practices in safflower. Methodology A field experiment was conducted during the period of 2020-21 at All India co-ordinated Research Project on Safflower, V.N.M.K.V., Parbhani. The soil was clayey in texture, low in available nitrogen (231 kg ha -1 ), low in available phosphorus (12.64 kg ha -1 ), rich in available potash (474 kg ha -1 ), sulphur (15.25 kg ha -1 ), and slightly alkaline in reaction. The soil was moderately alkaline in reaction (8.13 pH). In general, weather conditions were favourable for plant growth, and no severe pests and diseases were noticed during experimentation. The study involved two treatment combinations of two factors viz., Selective mechanization plot (SMP) and Farmer practice (FP) with two treatments. Each experimental unit was non-replicated having a Plot size of 1000 m 2 for each of the mechanical and normal plots. Sowing was completed as per treatments. Safflower variety PBNS -86 was sown at a spacing of 45 cm (between rows) X 20 cm (between Plants) The fertilizer dose of 60:40:00 NPK kg ha -1 was applied at the time of sowing. The package of recommended practices was adopted. The data on growth and yield parameters were analyzed with paired ‘t’ test and cost of cultivation, net returns, and B: C ratio was worked out. Data on the time period for each operation, and energy used were converted into suitable energy units and expressed in MJ/ha. Energy equivalents of inputs and outputs were computed based on values suggested by Gopalan et al. (1978) The Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment 736 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad calculation of energy input and output equivalents, the indices of energy ratio (energy use efficiency), energy productivity, and net energy were calculated (Rafiee et al., 2010) as follows: S.No 1 Sowing Name of field operation Energy ratio = Energy Productivity = Energy output (MJ/ha) Energy input (MJ/ha) Safflower yield (Kg/ha) Energy input (MJ/ha) Net Energy = Energy output (MJ/ha) – Energy input (MJ/ha) Mechanized condition With Seed cum Fertilizer Drill Farmer's practice Behind the bullock-drawn plough 2 Inter cultivation Power weeder Bullock drew Danthi 3 Plant protection Motorized/ power sprayers Knapsack sprayer 4 Harvesting, threshing, and winnowing Combiner with minute modification Manual Following parameters selected under selective mechanization vis-à-vis Farmer's practice in terms of yield, economics, and energy budgeting of Safflower Results From table, it is found that safflower seed yield (1485 kg/ha) was higher than farmer practice (1251 kg/ha). The seed yield of safflower was increased by 18.70% observed under mechanized conditions compared to the farmer's practice. Proper plant-to-plant population and optimum management practice can be adopted under mechanization than farmer practice which helps to increase or record good growth of crops than farmer practice. Further, the cost of cultivation incurred for the normal method of cultivation was higher (53921) compared to mechanized safflower cultivation (45101) leading to higher net returns (100699) and B: C ratio (3.20) in the mechanized plot. Comparing the yield and economics of cultivation methods, mechanized plot reduced the labour requirement, time of operation and cultivation cost, in turn, resulted in higher benefits. The energy use efficiency in the mechanized plot (0.56 kg/MJ) was higher than the normal plot (0.27 kg/MJ). This led to saving 17 labour/ha and saved 35 hrs time period/ha through selective mechanization of important operations. 737 | Page Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment
- Page 706 and 707: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 708 and 709: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 710 and 711: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 712 and 713: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 714 and 715: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 716 and 717: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 718 and 719: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 720 and 721: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 722 and 723: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 724 and 725: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 726 and 727: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 728 and 729: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 730 and 731: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 732 and 733: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 734 and 735: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 736 and 737: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 738 and 739: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 740 and 741: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 742 and 743: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 744 and 745: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 746 and 747: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 748 and 749: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 750 and 751: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 752 and 753: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 754 and 755: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 758 and 759: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 760 and 761: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 762 and 763: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 764 and 765: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 766 and 767: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 768 and 769: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 770 and 771: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 772 and 773: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 774 and 775: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 776 and 777: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 778 and 779: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 780 and 781: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 782 and 783: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 784 and 785: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 786 and 787: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 788 and 789: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 790 and 791: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 792 and 793: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 794 and 795: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 796 and 797: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 798 and 799: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 800 and 801: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 802 and 803: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 804 and 805: International Conference on Reimagi
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
T5-17P-1117<br />
Effect <strong>of</strong> Mechanization Practices on Economics <strong>of</strong> Soyabean-Safflower<br />
Cropping System<br />
S. A. Shinde*, P. O. Bhutada and S. B. Ghuge<br />
All India Coordinate Research Project on Safflower, Vasantrao Naik Marathwada Krishi Vidyapeeth<br />
Parbhani, Maharashtra, India.<br />
* santoshashinde338@gmail.com<br />
Oilseed crops are the second most important determinant <strong>of</strong> an agricultural economy, next only<br />
to cereals within the segment <strong>of</strong> field crops. Among oilseeds Safflower (Carthamus tinctorius<br />
L.) is an important oilseed crop with 35-40 % oil. It has been used as a source <strong>of</strong> edible oil and<br />
dying since ancient times. Effective use <strong>of</strong> agriculture machinery helps to increase productivity<br />
and production <strong>of</strong> output and undertake timely farm operations. This judicious use <strong>of</strong> time,<br />
labour, and resources facilitate sustainable intensification and is timely. Planting <strong>of</strong> crops,<br />
leading to an increase in productivity. Hence Mechanical power has become more economical<br />
and indispensable to meet targets <strong>of</strong> timeliness and efficient utilization <strong>of</strong> natural resources and<br />
inputs (Srinivasarao et al., 2013) Mechanization in safflower crop will help to timely field<br />
operations and easy harvesting and save huge cost <strong>of</strong> cultivation and sort the labour problem<br />
<strong>of</strong> the farmer. This study is therefore carried out to determine suitable mechanization practices<br />
in safflower.<br />
Methodology<br />
A field experiment was conducted during the period <strong>of</strong> 2020-21 at All India co-ordinated<br />
Research Project on Safflower, V.N.M.K.V., Parbhani. The soil was clayey in texture, low in<br />
available nitrogen (231 kg ha -1 ), low in available phosphorus (12.64 kg ha -1 ), rich in available<br />
potash (474 kg ha -1 ), sulphur (15.25 kg ha -1 ), and slightly alkaline in reaction. The soil was<br />
moderately alkaline in reaction (8.13 pH). In general, weather conditions were favourable for<br />
plant growth, and no severe pests and diseases were noticed during experimentation. The study<br />
involved two treatment combinations <strong>of</strong> two factors viz., Selective mechanization plot (SMP)<br />
and Farmer practice (FP) with two treatments. Each experimental unit was non-replicated<br />
having a Plot size <strong>of</strong> 1000 m 2 for each <strong>of</strong> the mechanical and normal plots. Sowing was<br />
completed as per treatments. Safflower variety PBNS -86 was sown at a spacing <strong>of</strong> 45 cm<br />
(between rows) X 20 cm (between Plants) The fertilizer dose <strong>of</strong> 60:40:00 NPK kg ha -1 was<br />
applied at the time <strong>of</strong> sowing. The package <strong>of</strong> recommended practices was adopted. The data<br />
on growth and yield parameters were analyzed with paired ‘t’ test and cost <strong>of</strong> cultivation, net<br />
returns, and B: C ratio was worked out. Data on the time period for each operation, and energy<br />
used were converted into suitable energy units and expressed in MJ/ha. Energy equivalents <strong>of</strong><br />
inputs and outputs were computed based on values suggested by Gopalan et al. (1978) The<br />
Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment<br />
736 | Page