20.12.2022 Views

Book of Extended summaries ISDA

Book of Extended summaries ISDA

Book of Extended summaries ISDA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

clay soil, 2001 in shallow clay soil and during 2004 and 2015 in shallow loam soils. In deep<br />

loam soils the crop performance was near-to-normal during the entire study period. Whereas<br />

in greengram unusually moist situations existed irrespective <strong>of</strong> the soil type and depth during<br />

2010 and 2013. However, the same situation was noted during 2008 and 2015 in both deep and<br />

shallow loam soils and during 2000, 2003, 2005 and in deep loam soils during 2007 alone.<br />

The relation established between rainfall and VegDRI also reported that the linear function<br />

represented data more than 50 percent during the entire study period. The predictive efficiency<br />

<strong>of</strong> the linear term (b) and the determination coefficient (R 2 ) was high in redgram and moderate<br />

to high in greengram. The total explained variation in the estimation <strong>of</strong> the crop performance<br />

by VegDRI index in relation to rainfall was 0.58 to 0.96. The explained variation <strong>of</strong> more than<br />

0.75 for the entire study period makes VegDRI index dependable in the estimation <strong>of</strong> redgram<br />

performance in response to soil moisture availability and is more than 0.5 for greengram.<br />

Conclusions<br />

From the above results it can be inferred that, input from the spectral signatures <strong>of</strong> the crop<br />

canopy besides ground-based information had made VegDRI more agreeable for different soil<br />

types, soil depths and crop types. A similar result was mentioned by Won-Ho Nam et al., where<br />

PDSI delayed or lagged in the drought assessment since the data depend on soil moisture,<br />

whereas VegDRI-SKorea was useful for more timely detection <strong>of</strong> improvement in drought<br />

conditions compared to the station-based self-calibrated PDSI. Crops like greengram being<br />

sturdier and with quick canopy coverage might have been analysed easily by VegDRI for crop<br />

condition based on moisture availability. According to Brown et al., (2008) any subtle change<br />

in vegetation conditions when there is low green biomass can result in greater fluctuations in<br />

NDVI values as compared to later in the growing season when slight changes in vegetation<br />

with higher biomass result in less change in the NDVI values.<br />

References<br />

Brown, J. F., Wardlow, B.D., Tadesse, T., Hayes, M. J., and Reed, B. C. 2007. The vegetation<br />

drought response index (VegDRI): A new integrated approach for monitoring drought<br />

stress in vegetation, In Press. GI Sci. Rem. Sens.<br />

Palmer, W. C. 1965. Meteorological drought. Office <strong>of</strong> Climatology Research Paper 45,<br />

Weather Bureau, Washington DC, 58 pp.<br />

Wilhite, D. A. and Glantz, M. H. 1985. Understanding the drought phenomenon: The role <strong>of</strong><br />

definitions. Water Int., 10:111–120<br />

Won-Ho Nam, Tsegaye Tadesse, Brian D, Wardlow, Michael Hayes J, Mark D. Svoboda, Eun-<br />

Mi Hong, Yakov A. Pachepsky and Min-Won Jang. 2018. Developing the vegetation drought<br />

717 | Page Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!