Book of Extended summaries ISDA
Book of Extended summaries ISDA Book of Extended summaries ISDA
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad T5-03O-1210 Real Time Monitoring and Management of Drought in Groundnut Sahadeva Reddy, A. Malliswara Reddy, K. Ashok Kumar, K.V.S. Sudheer, C. Radha Kumari, C. Yasmin, Ch. Murali Krishna, S. N. Malleswari and G. Ravindra Chary AICRP for Dryland Agriculture, Agricultural Research Station, Acharya N G Ranga Agricultural University, Ananthapuramu-515001, Andhra Pradesh Rainfed agriculture is likely to be more vulnerable to climate change because of its high dependency on monsoon and the chances of increased extreme weather events like delayed onset of monsoon, high intensity rainfall (wet spells), seasonal drought, early withdrawal of monsoon etc. due to aberrant behaviour of south-west (SW) monsoon. Almost 56 per cent of cropped area in Andhra Pradesh is under rainfed conditions where crop yields are largely influenced by the vagaries of the weather. Ananthapuramu region in the southern part of Andhra Pradesh is the driest part of the state, climatically classified as arid zone and receives an annual precipitation of 553 mm against the atmospheric water demand (PET) of 2128 mm. Despite such precarious conditions, the area under groundnut is increasing and at present it is being cultivated in an extent of 5.0 lakh ha. Among the abiotic stresses, drought (moisture stress) is the major factor influencing the yield of rainfed crops. Variation in crop yields is more in dry lands due to the nonreceipt of timely rainfall and prolonged dry spells during crop periods. Monsoon failures results in drought which has serious implications for small and marginal farmers and livelihoods of the rural poor. Any contingency measure, either technology related (land, soil, water, crop) or institutional and policy based, which is implemented based on real time weather pattern (including extreme events) in any crop growing season is considered as real time contingency planning. Hence, this experiment on real time drought monitoring and management was planned for adapting to current climate risks and will help in getting higher yields. Methodology Field experiments were conducted at AICRPDA, Agricultural Research Station, Ananthapuramu (latitude of 14°41′ N, longitude of 77°40′ E and altitude of 350 meters above mean sea level) during kharif from 2019 to 2021 in rainfed Alfisols. The two treatments consist of Real time drought management (RTDM) with proven contingency measures during early, mid-season, terminal drought and rainfed (control) in groundnut (VarietyK6). Each treatment was laid out in an area of 1000 m 2 . The initial soil fertility was low in organic carbon (0.20%), low in available nitrogen (140 kg ha -1 ), high in available phosphorous (107 kg ha -1 ) and low in available potassium (98 kg ha -1 ). Under RTDM in groundnut subsoiling @ 1m distance before sowing once in two years (2019 and 2021), formation of conservation furrows Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment 702 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad @ 3.6 m interval @ 30 DAS in all three years, KNO3 spray @ 0.5% at dry spell at pegging stage during 2019 and supplemental irrigation with sprinklers with harvested rain water@ 20 mm at pod initiation stage during 2021 was done. An amount of 517, 888 and 378 mm rainfall in 25,61 and 27 rainy days was received during the crop season of 2019, 2020 and 2021 respectively. The rainwater use efficiency (RWUE, kg ha -1 mm -1 ) was derived as ratio of yield (kg ha -1 ) attained by a crop and crop seasonal rainfall (mm) of the respective crop in each year. The cost of cultivation of each crop was determined by considering inputs like seed and fertilizer costs and agricultural operations from sowing to harvest. The gross returns were computed as a product of yield of a crop and its market price (Rs. kg -1 ). The benefit-cost ratio was computed as a ratio of gross returns and cost of cultivation for each crop. Results During the three years of study, real time monitoring and management of drought in groundnut, recorded higher pod, haulm yield, gross, net returns, benefit cost ratio and rain water use efficiency as compared to rainfed (control). RTDM practice enhanced the pod and haulm yields by 31 and 23, 38.8 and 21.2 and 25.8 and 14.9 per cent respectively during 2019, 2020 and 2021 respectively compared to control. This might be due to RTDM practice recorded higher soil moisture content and relative water content in different phenophases of groundnut. Higher yields were mainly due to increased availability of soil moisture by conservation of rainfall with deep tillage, conservation furrows and supplemental irrigation at critical stages of crop growth. Effect of Real time drought management (RTDM) practices in groundnut during kharif of 2019 to 2021 Parameter 2019 2020 2021 RTDM Control RTDM Control RTDM Control Pod yield (kg ha -1 ) 1660 1267 705 508 1370 1089 Haulm yield (kg ha -1 ) 2985 2435 2360 1950 2245 1954 Cost of cultivation (Rs. ha -1 ) 31250 27500 31750 28000 32250 29500 Gross Returns (Rs. ha -1 ) 97932 75521 48460 36166 79725 64220 Net Returns (Rs. ha -1 ) 66682 48021 16710 8166 47475 34720 B:C ratio 3.13 2.75 1.52 1.29 2.47 2.18 RWUE (kg ha -1 mm -1 ) 3.38 2.58 1.40 1.01 3.89 3.09 Conclusion Real time monitoring and management of drought with subsoiling @1 m distance before sowing once in two years, formation of conservation furrows @ 3.6 m interval @ 30 DAS, KNO 3 spray @ 0.5% at dry spell and supplemental irrigation with sprinklers with harvested rain water @ 20 mm at pod development stage increases the pod yield, gross and net returns in ground growing areas of scarce rainfall zone. 703 | Page Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment
- Page 672 and 673: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 674 and 675: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 676 and 677: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 678 and 679: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 680 and 681: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 682 and 683: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 684 and 685: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 686 and 687: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 688 and 689: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 690 and 691: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 692 and 693: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 694 and 695: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 696 and 697: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 698 and 699: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 700 and 701: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 702 and 703: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 704 and 705: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 706 and 707: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 708 and 709: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 710 and 711: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 712 and 713: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 714 and 715: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 716 and 717: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 718 and 719: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 720 and 721: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 724 and 725: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 726 and 727: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 728 and 729: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 730 and 731: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 732 and 733: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 734 and 735: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 736 and 737: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 738 and 739: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 740 and 741: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 742 and 743: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 744 and 745: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 746 and 747: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 748 and 749: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 750 and 751: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 752 and 753: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 754 and 755: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 756 and 757: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 758 and 759: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 760 and 761: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 762 and 763: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 764 and 765: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 766 and 767: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 768 and 769: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 770 and 771: International Conference on Reimagi
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
T5-03O-1210<br />
Real Time Monitoring and Management <strong>of</strong> Drought in Groundnut<br />
Sahadeva Reddy, A. Malliswara Reddy, K. Ashok Kumar, K.V.S. Sudheer,<br />
C. Radha Kumari, C. Yasmin, Ch. Murali Krishna, S. N. Malleswari and<br />
G. Ravindra Chary<br />
AICRP for Dryland Agriculture, Agricultural Research Station,<br />
Acharya N G Ranga Agricultural University, Ananthapuramu-515001, Andhra Pradesh<br />
Rainfed agriculture is likely to be more vulnerable to climate change because <strong>of</strong> its high<br />
dependency on monsoon and the chances <strong>of</strong> increased extreme weather events like delayed<br />
onset <strong>of</strong> monsoon, high intensity rainfall (wet spells), seasonal drought, early withdrawal <strong>of</strong><br />
monsoon etc. due to aberrant behaviour <strong>of</strong> south-west (SW) monsoon. Almost 56 per cent <strong>of</strong><br />
cropped area in Andhra Pradesh is under rainfed conditions where crop yields are largely<br />
influenced by the vagaries <strong>of</strong> the weather. Ananthapuramu region in the southern part <strong>of</strong><br />
Andhra Pradesh is the driest part <strong>of</strong> the state, climatically classified as arid zone and receives<br />
an annual precipitation <strong>of</strong> 553 mm against the atmospheric water demand (PET) <strong>of</strong> 2128 mm.<br />
Despite such precarious conditions, the area under groundnut is increasing and at present it is<br />
being cultivated in an extent <strong>of</strong> 5.0 lakh ha. Among the abiotic stresses, drought (moisture<br />
stress) is the major factor influencing the yield <strong>of</strong> rainfed crops. Variation in crop yields is more<br />
in dry lands due to the nonreceipt <strong>of</strong> timely rainfall and prolonged dry spells during crop<br />
periods. Monsoon failures results in drought which has serious implications for small and<br />
marginal farmers and livelihoods <strong>of</strong> the rural poor. Any contingency measure, either<br />
technology related (land, soil, water, crop) or institutional and policy based, which is<br />
implemented based on real time weather pattern (including extreme events) in any crop<br />
growing season is considered as real time contingency planning. Hence, this experiment on<br />
real time drought monitoring and management was planned for adapting to current climate<br />
risks and will help in getting higher yields.<br />
Methodology<br />
Field experiments were conducted at AICRPDA, Agricultural Research Station,<br />
Ananthapuramu (latitude <strong>of</strong> 14°41′ N, longitude <strong>of</strong> 77°40′ E and altitude <strong>of</strong> 350 meters above<br />
mean sea level) during kharif from 2019 to 2021 in rainfed Alfisols. The two treatments<br />
consist <strong>of</strong> Real time drought management (RTDM) with proven contingency measures during<br />
early, mid-season, terminal drought and rainfed (control) in groundnut (VarietyK6). Each<br />
treatment was laid out in an area <strong>of</strong> 1000 m 2 . The initial soil fertility was low in organic carbon<br />
(0.20%), low in available nitrogen (140 kg ha -1 ), high in available phosphorous (107 kg ha -1 )<br />
and low in available potassium (98 kg ha -1 ). Under RTDM in groundnut subsoiling @ 1m<br />
distance before sowing once in two years (2019 and 2021), formation <strong>of</strong> conservation furrows<br />
Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment<br />
702 | Page