20.12.2022 Views

Book of Extended summaries ISDA

Book of Extended summaries ISDA

Book of Extended summaries ISDA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

with tillage practices under main plot treatments which include T1: Conventional tillage (CT);<br />

T2: Zero tillage (ZT) and T3: Zero tillage + Residue (ZT+R) and nutrient management practices<br />

as subplot treatments which include N1: Recommended Dose <strong>of</strong> Fertilizer (RDF) @ 120-60-40<br />

kg N-P2O5-K2O kg ha -1 with N applied in three splits; N2: site-specific nutrient management<br />

(SSNM) based on Nutrient Expert for rice @ 109-28-46 kg N-P2O5-K2O with N applied in<br />

three splits and N3: 60 % N @ basal + green seeker ged N application (GSGN) (rest <strong>of</strong> the N was<br />

applied based on the real-time crop demand at regular intervals) + 100% PK <strong>of</strong> RDF. Three splits<br />

<strong>of</strong> N were applied @ 2:1:1 ratio at basal, active tillering, and panicle initiation in N1 and N2<br />

treatments.<br />

Results<br />

The yield attributes like panicles/m 2 and grains/ panicle were significantly higher under ZT+R<br />

(239; 122) over CT (201; 107) among tillage practices whereas, among nutrient management<br />

treatments, SSNM based on Nutrient Expert (228; 119) has significantly higher values over RDF<br />

(212; 111). Both grain and straw yields <strong>of</strong> DSR were statistically superior in ZT+R over CT with<br />

14.03 % and 9.27 % more yields, respectively but were statistically at par with ZT whereas,<br />

SSNM based on Nutrient Expert has significantly superior grain and straw yields over RDF with<br />

14.91 % and 7.73 % more yields respectively but were statistically at par with 60% N + GSGN +<br />

100% PK <strong>of</strong> RDF. Any <strong>of</strong> the treatments did not influence Harvest Index (HI); however, higher<br />

HI was found under ZT+R (41.05) fb ZT (40.89) fb CT (39.86) among tillage practices while,<br />

SSNM based on Nutrient Expert has higher HI (41.25) fb 60% N + GSGN + 100% PK <strong>of</strong> RDF<br />

(41.04) fb RDF (39.52) across nutrient management practices.These better yields under ZT +R,<br />

ZT could be credited to the improved soil structure, overall porosity, aggregate stability, water<br />

holding capacity (WHC) due to less soil disruption and with constant crop residue accumulation<br />

over the years enriched the soil with organic matter and soil biota which enhances the<br />

mineralization process and increasing plant nutrient availability and also these precision nutrient<br />

management practices aided in timely and balanced availability <strong>of</strong> all vital nutrients thereby<br />

progressing crop yields through optimized nutrient usage by the rice crop. The total N, P, K, Zn,<br />

Fe, Cu, and Mn uptake by the crop was found to be significantly higher in Zero tillage + Residue<br />

management among tillage practices, whereas among nutrient management treatments, SSNM<br />

based on Nutrient Expert have significantly higher total N, P, and K uptake but has no significant<br />

influence on micronutrient uptake and these results are in accordance with Rajesh et al. (2018).<br />

685 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!