Book of Extended summaries ISDA
Book of Extended summaries ISDA Book of Extended summaries ISDA
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad Results At 35 th year of experimentation the treatment T 7 (25 kg N ha -1 FYM+ 25 kg N ha -1 Urea) gave significantly higher grain (19.25 q ha -1 ) and stover (40.42 q ha -1 ) yield, net monetary returns (Rs. 39525 ha -1 ) with B: C ratio (2.25), RWUE (32.08 kg ha -1 mm -1 ). The nutrients uptake by Rabi sorghum as well as rain water use efficiency and residual soil fertility (major and micro nutrients) were also increased as shown in the table. The N fixers and P solubilizers count was more under Leucaena application either alone or with crop residue or FYM. Nishimura (1994) reported that green gram as a mulch-cum-manure to rabi sorghum increased the gross profit by 132 per cent. Conjoint use of FYM and chemical fertilizers on soybean-safflower sequence cropping showed that the half of recommended fertilizers (10 N + 40 P 2O 5 ha -1 + 6 tonnes FYM) gave highest yield of soybean and safflower (Sharma, 1992). Reddy et al. (1991) also reported similar trend of results i.e., 75 per cent substitution of chemical N with use of Leucaena leucocphala gave higher bio mass and yield of sorghum. Conclusion From the above study it can be concluded that, the nitrogen requirement of rRabi sorghum can be fulfilled by conjoint use of organic (50 %) and inorganic fertilizers (50 %) or equally effective treatment i.e., 50 % N ha -1 through CR + 50% N ha -1 through Leucanea lopping which maintan the better soil health, RWUE and microbial count. This can be way forward to make organic farming in rainfed area that conserve natural resources and make farming more resilient and less dependent on chemical inputs. Effect of recycling of different organics on yield and RWUE by grain and stover of rabi Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture sorghum (2021-22) Treatment Yield (q ha -1 ) Cost of Cult n Rs/ha Grain 2021- 22 Stover 2021- 22 Mean Grain (35years) Mean Stover (35years) Net Returns Rs/ha B:C Ratio RWUE (Kg ha -1 mm -1 ) 0 kg N ha -1 –control 7.72 16.23 5.77 15.72 24595 3892 1.16 12.86 25 kg N ha -1 –urea 8.65 18.07 7.60 20.62 24916 6944 1.28 14.41 50 kg N ha -1 –urea 10.97 25.75 9.30 23.86 25238 16608 1.66 18.29 25 kg N ha -1 –CR 9.28 19.48 8.11 20.62 28762 5469 1.19 15.46 25 kg N ha -1 –FYM 10.29 21.53 9.03 22.38 31174 6748 1.22 17.14 25 kg N ha -1 -CR +25 kg N ha -1 –urea 25 kg N ha -1 - FYM +25 kg N ha - 1 urea 25 kg N ha -1 –CR +25 kg N ha -1 –Leucaena loppings 14.58 30.61 10.86 25.92 29083 24705 1.85 24.29 19.25 40.42 12.84 28.21 31495 39525 2.25 32.08 18.23 38.28 12.15 27.34 31967 35289 2.10 30.38 25 kg N ha -1 -Leucaena loppings 8.61 18.09 8.23 20.30 27800 3983 1.14 14.36 25 kg N ha -1 -Leucaena 12.26 25.76 10.80 24.54 28121 17130 1.61 20.44 566 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad loppings+25 kg N ha -1 –urea SE+ 0.56 1.63 -- -- 2219.1 -- -- CD at 5% 1.69 4.88 -- -- 6644.5 -- -- Effect of treatments on soil chemical properties at harvest (2021-22). Treatments pH EC Available Nutrients (kg/ha) DTPA extractable micronutrients (ppm) N P K Fe Mn Zn Cu 0 kg N ha -1 –control 7.96 0.47 119.00 16.18 681.00 2.55 4.29 0.18 0.52 25 kg N ha -1 –urea 7.78 0.56 159.67 21.78 819.33 3.48 5.90 0.38 1.36 50 kg N ha -1 –urea 7.95 0.58 168.67 24.38 883.00 4.34 6.45 0.32 1.26 25 kg N ha -1 –CR 7.42 0.61 180.00 34.57 951.00 4.46 6.58 0.45 1.34 25 kg N ha -1 –FYM 7.31 0.66 184.00 30.83 969.00 4.47 7.59 0.47 1.37 25 kg N ha -1 -CR +25 kg N ha -1 –urea 25 kg N ha -1 - FYM +25 kg N ha - 1 urea 25 kg N ha -1 –CR +25 kg N ha -1 –Leucaena loppings 7.20 0.68 190.00 31.43 974.33 4.65 7.65 0.60 1.49 7.22 0.70 203.00 35.22 993.00 4.81 7.64 0.61 1.51 7.20 0.74 203.67 39.31 996.00 4.72 8.00 0.63 1.54 25 kg N ha -1 -Leucaena loppings 7.28 0.71 180.00 31.30 868.67 4.40 7.94 0.51 1.32 25 kg N ha -1 -Leucaena loppings +25 kg N ha -1 –urea 7.30 0.72 189.00 33.66 885.67 3.79 7.43 0.49 1.23 SE+ 0.01 0.01 0.79 0.45 2.04 0.02 0.02 0.01 0.01 CD at 5% NS NS 2.29 1.31 5.89 NS NS NS NS Initial Values (2013-14) 8.1 0.49 137 11.5 592 2.95 12.6 0.49 0.50 References Nishimura, Y. 1994. An improved technology of rainfed farming in the semi arid tropics. Japanese J. Trop. Agri. 38:103 Reddy, G. S., Venkateshwaralu, B., and. Vittal, K. P. R. 1991. Effect of substitution of fertilizer nitrogen with subabul (Leucaena leucocephela) leaves on growth and yield of sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) in an alfisol. Indian J. Agril. Sci. 61:316. Sharma, R. A. 1992. Efficient water use and sustainable production of rainfed soybean and safflower through conjunctive use of organic and fertilizers. Crop. Res.181. 567 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture
- Page 533 and 534: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 535 and 536: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 537 and 538: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 539 and 540: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 541 and 542: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 543 and 544: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 545 and 546: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 547 and 548: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 549 and 550: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 551 and 552: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 553 and 554: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 555 and 556: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 557 and 558: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 559 and 560: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 561 and 562: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 563 and 564: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 567: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 571 and 572: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 573 and 574: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 575 and 576: Resource conservation and rainfed a
- Page 577 and 578: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 579 and 580: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 581 and 582: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 583: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 587 and 588: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 589 and 590: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 591 and 592: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 593 and 594: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 595 and 596: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 597 and 598: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 599 and 600: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 601 and 602: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 603 and 604: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 605 and 606: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 607 and 608: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 609 and 610: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 611 and 612: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 613 and 614: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 615 and 616: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 617 and 618: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 619 and 620: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 621 and 622: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 623 and 624: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 625 and 626: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 627 and 628: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 629 and 630: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 632 and 633: International Conference on Reimagi
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Results<br />
At 35 th year <strong>of</strong> experimentation the treatment T 7 (25 kg N ha -1 FYM+ 25 kg N ha -1 Urea) gave<br />
significantly higher grain (19.25 q ha -1 ) and stover (40.42 q ha -1 ) yield, net monetary returns<br />
(Rs. 39525 ha -1 ) with B: C ratio (2.25), RWUE (32.08 kg ha -1 mm -1 ). The nutrients uptake by<br />
Rabi sorghum as well as rain water use efficiency and residual soil fertility (major and micro<br />
nutrients) were also increased as shown in the table. The N fixers and P solubilizers count<br />
was more under Leucaena application either alone or with crop residue or FYM. Nishimura<br />
(1994) reported that green gram as a mulch-cum-manure to rabi sorghum increased the gross<br />
pr<strong>of</strong>it by 132 per cent. Conjoint use <strong>of</strong> FYM and chemical fertilizers on soybean-safflower<br />
sequence cropping showed that the half <strong>of</strong> recommended fertilizers (10 N + 40 P 2O 5 ha -1 + 6<br />
tonnes FYM) gave highest yield <strong>of</strong> soybean and safflower (Sharma, 1992). Reddy et al.<br />
(1991) also reported similar trend <strong>of</strong> results i.e., 75 per cent substitution <strong>of</strong> chemical N with<br />
use <strong>of</strong> Leucaena leucocphala gave higher bio mass and yield <strong>of</strong> sorghum.<br />
Conclusion<br />
From the above study it can be concluded that, the nitrogen requirement <strong>of</strong> rRabi sorghum<br />
can be fulfilled by conjoint use <strong>of</strong> organic (50 %) and inorganic fertilizers (50 %) or equally<br />
effective treatment i.e., 50 % N ha -1 through CR + 50% N ha -1 through Leucanea lopping<br />
which maintan the better soil health, RWUE and microbial count. This can be way forward to<br />
make organic farming in rainfed area that conserve natural resources and make farming more<br />
resilient and less dependent on chemical inputs.<br />
Effect <strong>of</strong> recycling <strong>of</strong> different organics on yield and RWUE by grain and stover <strong>of</strong> rabi<br />
Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture<br />
sorghum (2021-22)<br />
Treatment Yield (q ha -1 ) Cost <strong>of</strong><br />
Cult n<br />
Rs/ha<br />
Grain<br />
2021-<br />
22<br />
Stover<br />
2021-<br />
22<br />
Mean<br />
Grain<br />
(35years)<br />
Mean<br />
Stover<br />
(35years)<br />
Net<br />
Returns<br />
Rs/ha<br />
B:C<br />
Ratio<br />
RWUE<br />
(Kg<br />
ha -1<br />
mm -1 )<br />
0 kg N ha -1 –control 7.72 16.23 5.77 15.72 24595 3892 1.16 12.86<br />
25 kg N ha -1 –urea 8.65 18.07 7.60 20.62 24916 6944 1.28 14.41<br />
50 kg N ha -1 –urea 10.97 25.75 9.30 23.86 25238 16608 1.66 18.29<br />
25 kg N ha -1 –CR 9.28 19.48 8.11 20.62 28762 5469 1.19 15.46<br />
25 kg N ha -1 –FYM 10.29 21.53 9.03 22.38 31174 6748 1.22 17.14<br />
25 kg N ha -1 -CR +25 kg N ha -1<br />
–urea<br />
25 kg N ha -1 - FYM +25 kg N ha -<br />
1<br />
urea<br />
25 kg N ha -1 –CR +25 kg N ha -1<br />
–Leucaena loppings<br />
14.58 30.61 10.86 25.92 29083 24705 1.85 24.29<br />
19.25 40.42 12.84 28.21 31495 39525 2.25 32.08<br />
18.23 38.28 12.15 27.34 31967 35289 2.10 30.38<br />
25 kg N ha -1 -Leucaena loppings 8.61 18.09 8.23 20.30 27800 3983 1.14 14.36<br />
25 kg N ha -1 -Leucaena 12.26 25.76 10.80 24.54 28121 17130 1.61 20.44<br />
566 | Page