Book of Extended summaries ISDA
Book of Extended summaries ISDA Book of Extended summaries ISDA
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad Soil Test Crop Response approach for Chickpea Crop in Vertisol T4-38P-1390 Y. S. Satish Kumar * , K. Arun Kumar, K. Prabhakar, K. Mohan Vishnuvardhan, K. Jaya Lakshmi, S. Isha Parveen and M. Jyotsna Kiranmayi Regional Agricultural Research Station, Acharya N. G. Ranga Agricultural University, Nandyal-518502 * ys.sathishkumar@angrau.ac.in Various approaches have been tried to determine the amount of fertilizer needed for different crop yield. Among different approaches the targeted yield approach has proved its variation in the recommendation of chemical fertilizers to variety of crops. Chickpea (Cicer arientinum) is the world 3rd most important source of food legume crop. Chickpea grains are rich source of protein contains about 23% protein, 57% carbohydrates and 5% fat. It is also good source of vitamine B and minerals like potassium, phosphorus and zinc. In India, chickpea is grown on an 8.59 million ha area with 7.05 million tonne production. In Maharashtra chickpea is grown on 1.44 million ha area with 0.73-million-ton production. The average productivity of chickpea in India is 840 kg ha-1 which is considerably low as compared to the production potential of the improved cultivars of chickpea. The productivity of chickpea can be increased by judicious and balanced fertilization. Fertilizer management through Integrated Plant Nutrient Supply (IPNS) based yield target fertilizer prescription equations can be the best option for increase in productivity as well as maintaining the soil health. It is necessary to supply essential nutrient elements in appropriate proportion to maintain soil health and soil fertility and also to increase the crop production. Several approaches have been used for fertilizer recommendation based on chemical soil test so as to attain maximum yield per unit of fertilizer use. Among the various approaches, the target yield approach has found popularity in India (Subba Rao and Srivastava, 2000). This method not only estimates soil test-based fertilizer dose but also the level of yield the farmer can achieve with that particular dose. It gives a real balance between applied nutrients and the available nutrients already present in the soil. Crop fertilization based on generalized recommendation leads to under fertilization or over fertilization, which leads lower production, profitability along with environmental pollution. Enhancement of farm profitability under different soil climate condition it is necessary to have information on optimum fertilizer recommendation for different crop which are based on the soil test and crop response studies. Keeping in view, the present investigation entitled ‘Soil test crop response approach for chickpea crop in Vertisol’ was undertaken to assess the effect of STCR based N, P and K application on productivity of Chickpea crop. Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming, INM, soil-microorganisms-plant interactions 533 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad Methodology The field experiments were conducted during the kharif& Rabi seasons of crop years, 2019, 2020 & 2021at Regional Agricultural Research Station, Nandyala, Andhra Pradesh. The soil of experimental site was medium deep black, low in organic carbon (0.24 %), low in Nitrogen (116 kg/ha), high in available P 2O 5 (69.5 kg ha -1 ) and available K 2O (536 kg ha -1 ). In Kharif, crops maize, sunflower and blackgram crops were sown in 3 main plots. In rabi, each main plot devided in to 3 sub plots and chick pea crop was sown with application of 100% RDF, 100% STCR equation (Target 20 q/ha) and 50% STCR equation (Target 20 q/ha) by following STCR equation of FN = 5.03 T – 0.27 SN FP 2O 5 = 9.71 T – 1.82 SP FK 2O = 6.23 T – 0.22 SK . Results Among the three cropping sequences, the higher chickpea yield (2045kg/ha) recorded in Sunflower - chickpea cropping sequence with 50% STCR based fertilizer application. Among the fertilizer treatments 50% STCR recorded higher chickpea yield followed by 100 % STCR and 100 % RDF in all the cropping sequences in all the years. Influence of site-specific nutrient management on growth and yield of chickpea during rabi 2021-22 Cropping system Black gram followed by Chickpea Maize followed by Chickpea Sunflower followed by Chickpea Treatments Plant height (cm) No. of pods plant -1 Test weight (g) Yield (kg/ha) 100%RDF 44.4 51 31.5 1680 100% STCR 41.5 54 28.3 1820 50% STCR 42.0 43 30.7 1850 100%RDF 39.3 40 27.0 1857 100% STCR 39.4 40 28.7 1925 50% STCR 41.5 44 28.3 1908 100%RDF 40.9 41 29.5 1785 100% STCR 38.7 34 28.3 1833. 50% STCR 38.6 29 28.3 2045 References Jadhav, A.B., Kadlag, A.D., Patil, V.S., Bachkar, S.R., Dale, R.M. 2009. Response of chickpea to conjoint application of inorganic fertilizers based on STCR approach and vermicomposting on Inceptisol. J. Maharashtra Agric. Univ., 34(2):125-127. Salunkhe, S.H., Kadlag. And Durgude, S.A. 2018. Soil test crop response approach for chickpea in an Inceptisol. Int. J. Chem. Stud., 6(4): 1954-1959. 534 | Page Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming, INM, soilmicroorganisms-plant interactions
- Page 495 and 496: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 497 and 498: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 499 and 500: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 501 and 502: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 503 and 504: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 505 and 506: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 507 and 508: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 509 and 510: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 511 and 512: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 513 and 514: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 515 and 516: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 517 and 518: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 519 and 520: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 521 and 522: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 523 and 524: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 525 and 526: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 527 and 528: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 529 and 530: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 531 and 532: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 533 and 534: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 535 and 536: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 537 and 538: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 539 and 540: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 541 and 542: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 543 and 544: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 545: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 549 and 550: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 551 and 552: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 553 and 554: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 555 and 556: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 557 and 558: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 559 and 560: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 561 and 562: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 563 and 564: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 567: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 571 and 572: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 573 and 574: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 575 and 576: Resource conservation and rainfed a
- Page 577 and 578: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 579 and 580: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 581 and 582: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 583 and 584: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 585 and 586: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 587 and 588: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 589 and 590: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 591 and 592: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 593 and 594: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 595 and 596: International Conference on Reimagi
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Soil Test Crop Response approach for Chickpea Crop in Vertisol<br />
T4-38P-1390<br />
Y. S. Satish Kumar * , K. Arun Kumar, K. Prabhakar, K. Mohan Vishnuvardhan,<br />
K. Jaya Lakshmi, S. Isha Parveen and M. Jyotsna Kiranmayi<br />
Regional Agricultural Research Station, Acharya N. G. Ranga Agricultural University,<br />
Nandyal-518502<br />
* ys.sathishkumar@angrau.ac.in<br />
Various approaches have been tried to determine the amount <strong>of</strong> fertilizer needed for different<br />
crop yield. Among different approaches the targeted yield approach has proved its variation in<br />
the recommendation <strong>of</strong> chemical fertilizers to variety <strong>of</strong> crops. Chickpea (Cicer arientinum) is<br />
the world 3rd most important source <strong>of</strong> food legume crop. Chickpea grains are rich source <strong>of</strong><br />
protein contains about 23% protein, 57% carbohydrates and 5% fat. It is also good source <strong>of</strong><br />
vitamine B and minerals like potassium, phosphorus and zinc. In India, chickpea is grown on an<br />
8.59 million ha area with 7.05 million tonne production. In Maharashtra chickpea is grown on<br />
1.44 million ha area with 0.73-million-ton production. The average productivity <strong>of</strong> chickpea in<br />
India is 840 kg ha-1 which is considerably low as compared to the production potential <strong>of</strong> the<br />
improved cultivars <strong>of</strong> chickpea. The productivity <strong>of</strong> chickpea can be increased by judicious and<br />
balanced fertilization. Fertilizer management through Integrated Plant Nutrient Supply (IPNS)<br />
based yield target fertilizer prescription equations can be the best option for increase in<br />
productivity as well as maintaining the soil health. It is necessary to supply essential nutrient<br />
elements in appropriate proportion to maintain soil health and soil fertility and also to increase<br />
the crop production. Several approaches have been used for fertilizer recommendation based on<br />
chemical soil test so as to attain maximum yield per unit <strong>of</strong> fertilizer use. Among the various<br />
approaches, the target yield approach has found popularity in India (Subba Rao and Srivastava,<br />
2000). This method not only estimates soil test-based fertilizer dose but also the level <strong>of</strong> yield the<br />
farmer can achieve with that particular dose. It gives a real balance between applied nutrients and<br />
the available nutrients already present in the soil. Crop fertilization based on generalized<br />
recommendation leads to under fertilization or over fertilization, which leads lower production,<br />
pr<strong>of</strong>itability along with environmental pollution. Enhancement <strong>of</strong> farm pr<strong>of</strong>itability under<br />
different soil climate condition it is necessary to have information on optimum fertilizer<br />
recommendation for different crop which are based on the soil test and crop response studies.<br />
Keeping in view, the present investigation entitled ‘Soil test crop response approach for chickpea<br />
crop in Vertisol’ was undertaken to assess the effect <strong>of</strong> STCR based N, P and K application on<br />
productivity <strong>of</strong> Chickpea crop.<br />
Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming,<br />
INM, soil-microorganisms-plant interactions<br />
533 | Page