Book of Extended summaries ISDA
Book of Extended summaries ISDA Book of Extended summaries ISDA
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad Economics of different treatments was worked out based on pooled results of pod and haulm yield of groundnut in terms of net returns ha -1 and B:C ratio considering the prevailing market price of produce and cost of cultivation. Results Based on three years pooled mean pod and haulm yield of groundnut and soil moisture content was affected significantly due to the application of hydrogel and organic manures. Significantly highest pod and haulm yield and soil moisture content was recorded under application of hydrogel @ 2.5 kg ha -1 over control. Among organic manures, application of FYM @ 10 t ha -1 was recorded significantly highest pod and haulm yield as well as soil moisture content as compared to control, but it was remained at par with vermicompost @ 2.0 t ha -1 in respect of pod yield and soil moisture content. Maximum rain water use efficiency (4.28 kg ha -1 mm -1 ) was obtained with application of hydrogel@ 2.5 kg ha -1 and FYM @ 10 t ha -1 as compared to rest of treatments under different levels of hydrogel and organic manure, respectively. Similarly, the application of hydrogel @ 2.5 kg ha -1 and FYM @ 10 t ha -1 gave the highest net returns of Rs. 82363 ha -1 and 80600 ha -1 with B: C ratio of 2.50 and 2.42, as compared to the rest of treatments under different levels of hydrogel and organic manure, respectively. Productivity, soil moisture content, rain water use efficiency and economics of groundnut as influenced by hydrogel and organic manures under rainfed conditions (pooled mean of 3years) Treatments Hydrogel levels (kg ha -1 ) Productivity (kg ha -1 ) Pod Haulm Soil moisture content (%) Rain water use efficiency (kg ha -1 mm -1 ) Net return (Rs. ha -1 ) B:C Ratio Control 1919 4809 21.70 3.85 71478 2.36 2.5 2119 5411 23.75 4.28 82363 2.50 5.0 2034 4853 23.76 4.07 72679 2.27 SEm+ 48 141 0.35 CD (P=0.05) 135 402 1.00 Organic manures Control 1933 4757 22.47 3.86 72928 2.42 FYM @10 t ha -1 2126 5381 23.80 4.28 80600 2.42 Vermicompost @ 2.0 t ha -1 2013 4936 22.93 4.06 72992 2.29 SEm+ 48 141 0.35 CD (P=0.05) 135 402 1.00 Conclusion Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance 45 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad From the above findings, it could be concluded that application of hydrogel @ 2.5 kg ha -1 and FYM @ 10 t ha -1 was found superior in increasing the productivity, rain water use efficiency and economics of groundnut under rainfed conditions of Saurashtra region. T1-13P-1023 Straw Mulching as Climate Resilience Measure for In-situ Water Management and Enhancing Productivity of Rainfed Soybean S.H. Narale*, M.S. Pendke, W.N. Narkhede, B.V.Asewar and P.H. Gourkhede Vasantrao Naik Marathwada Agricultural University, Parbhani (M.S.) *sskhune2602@gmail.com Soybean is a major kharif crop grown in Marathwada region of Maharashtra under rainfed condition and is being apreferred crop by the marginal and small rainfed farmers. The region receives mean annual rainfall of 880 mm. Rainfall in uncertain and erratic in this region. The productivity of soybean particularly in Marathwada region is variable due occurrence of 3 to 4 dryspells during July to September. The crop productivity decreases with either deficiency of rainfall or its distribution or due to moisture stress in critical growth period. Mulching is one of the important practices to conserve rainwater and thereby soil moisture which help sustain the crop productivity. It was also noted that straw mulching increased soil moisture content in the maize-wheat cropping system in the north-western regions of India, and thus enhanced crop productivity (Sharma et al. 2010).The study evaluated the effect of straw mulching on productivity and profitability of soybean with in-situ moisture conservation on farmer’s field. Methodology Research demonstrations were conducted on farmers’ fields during 2016-17 to 2020-21 under FLD at village Babhulgoan in Parbhani District in Marathwada region of Maharashtra. Most of the farmers were cultivating soybean under rainfed condition and were advocated to apply straw mulch in inter-row of soybean crop for moisture conservation. Demonstration fields were selected based on the willingness of the farmers. The rainfall data was collected from the nearest rain gauge station. The duration of dryspells and number of dryspells were recorded every year. The data on crop yield in both the field i.e. with straw mulch and without straw mulch were recorded. Results The mean annual rainfall of the station is 880.9 mm. Out of the 5years, above normal rainfall occurred during 4 years and below normal rainfall was observed in one year. However, the distribution of rainfall was different in every year. Out of the 5 years, 3 years i.e. 2017, 2019 and 2020, 4 dryspells were observed every year which has resulted moisture stress during crop period. 46 | Page Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance
- Page 1 and 2: Extended Summaries 22-24 December,
- Page 3 and 4: Citation Rama Rao, C.A., Srinivasa
- Page 5 and 6: Resilience through land and water m
- Page 7 and 8: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 9 and 10: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 11 and 12: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 13 and 14: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 15 and 16: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 17 and 18: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 19 and 20: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 21 and 22: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 23 and 24: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 25 and 26: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 27 and 28: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 29 and 30: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 31 and 32: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 33 and 34: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 35 and 36: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 37 and 38: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 39 and 40: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 41 and 42: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 43 and 44: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 45 and 46: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 47 and 48: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 49: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 53 and 54: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 55 and 56: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 57 and 58: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 59 and 60: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 61 and 62: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 63 and 64: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 65 and 66: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 67 and 68: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 69 and 70: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 71 and 72: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 73 and 74: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 75 and 76: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 77 and 78: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 79 and 80: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 81 and 82: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 83 and 84: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 85 and 86: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 87 and 88: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 89 and 90: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 91 and 92: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 93 and 94: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 95 and 96: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 97 and 98: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 99 and 100: International Conference on Reimagi
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Economics <strong>of</strong> different treatments was worked out based on pooled results <strong>of</strong> pod and haulm<br />
yield <strong>of</strong> groundnut in terms <strong>of</strong> net returns ha -1 and B:C ratio considering the prevailing market<br />
price <strong>of</strong> produce and cost <strong>of</strong> cultivation.<br />
Results<br />
Based on three years pooled mean pod and haulm yield <strong>of</strong> groundnut and soil moisture content<br />
was affected significantly due to the application <strong>of</strong> hydrogel and organic manures.<br />
Significantly highest pod and haulm yield and soil moisture content was recorded under<br />
application <strong>of</strong> hydrogel @ 2.5 kg ha -1 over control. Among organic manures, application <strong>of</strong><br />
FYM @ 10 t ha -1 was recorded significantly highest pod and haulm yield as well as soil<br />
moisture content as compared to control, but it was remained at par with vermicompost @ 2.0<br />
t ha -1 in respect <strong>of</strong> pod yield and soil moisture content. Maximum rain water use efficiency<br />
(4.28 kg ha -1 mm -1 ) was obtained with application <strong>of</strong> hydrogel@ 2.5 kg ha -1 and FYM @ 10 t<br />
ha -1 as compared to rest <strong>of</strong> treatments under different levels <strong>of</strong> hydrogel and organic manure,<br />
respectively. Similarly, the application <strong>of</strong> hydrogel @ 2.5 kg ha -1 and FYM @ 10 t ha -1 gave<br />
the highest net returns <strong>of</strong> Rs. 82363 ha -1 and 80600 ha -1 with B: C ratio <strong>of</strong> 2.50 and 2.42, as<br />
compared to the rest <strong>of</strong> treatments under different levels <strong>of</strong> hydrogel and organic manure,<br />
respectively.<br />
Productivity, soil moisture content, rain water use efficiency and economics <strong>of</strong> groundnut as<br />
influenced by hydrogel and organic manures under rainfed conditions (pooled mean <strong>of</strong> 3years)<br />
Treatments<br />
Hydrogel levels (kg ha -1 )<br />
Productivity<br />
(kg ha -1 )<br />
Pod<br />
Haulm<br />
Soil<br />
moisture<br />
content<br />
(%)<br />
Rain<br />
water use<br />
efficiency<br />
(kg ha -1 mm -1 )<br />
Net<br />
return<br />
(Rs.<br />
ha -1 )<br />
B:C<br />
Ratio<br />
Control 1919 4809 21.70 3.85 71478 2.36<br />
2.5 2119 5411 23.75 4.28 82363 2.50<br />
5.0 2034 4853 23.76 4.07 72679 2.27<br />
SEm+ 48 141 0.35<br />
CD (P=0.05) 135 402 1.00<br />
Organic manures<br />
Control 1933 4757 22.47 3.86 72928 2.42<br />
FYM @10 t ha -1 2126 5381 23.80 4.28 80600 2.42<br />
Vermicompost @ 2.0 t ha -1 2013 4936 22.93 4.06 72992 2.29<br />
SEm+ 48 141 0.35<br />
CD (P=0.05) 135 402 1.00<br />
Conclusion<br />
Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance<br />
45 | Page