Book of Extended summaries ISDA
Book of Extended summaries ISDA Book of Extended summaries ISDA
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad References Dębska, B., Dlugosz, J., Piotrowska-Dlugosz, A., Banach-Szott, M. 2016. The impact of a bio-fertilizer on the soil organic matter status and carbon sequestration—results from a field-scale study. J Soil Sediment.16:2335–2343. Sharma, K. L., Srinivasarao, Ch., Suma Chandrika, D., Lal, M., Indoria, A. K., Sammi Reddy, K., Ravindra Chary, G., Amrutsagar, V., Kathmale, D. K., More, N. B., Srinivas, K., Gopinath, K. A., Kalyana Srinivas, D. 2018. Effect of predominant integrated nutrient management practices on soil quality indicators and soil quality indices under post monsoon (rabi) sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) in rainfed black soils (Vertisols) of western India. Commun. Soil Sci Plant Anal. 49:1629–1637. Singh, G. B., Yadav, D. V. 1992. Integrated nutrient supply system in sugarcane and sugarcane-based cropping system. Fertil News. 37:15–22. Srinivasarao, Ch., Gopinath, K. A., Prasad, J. V. N. S., Prasannakumar, A. K., Singh. 2016. Climate resilient villages for sustainable food security in tropical India: concept, process, technologies, institutions and impacts. Adv Agron. 140:101–214. T4-02O-1260 Carbon Sequestrations Impact on Black Cotton Soil under Rainfed Condition of Malwa Plateau Bharat Singh* and S.K. Sharma * singhbharat05@gmail.com The soil organic carbon is the very foundation for healthy and productive soils. The soil organic matter positively influences and modifies almost all the soil properties. Considering the role of soil organic matter in maintaining soil health, the agricultural practices that enhance the soil organic carbon are essential. Addition of organic matter through green manures plays an important role in improving productivity of crop besides improvement in soil physico-chemical properties, which often deteriorate under intensive cropping involving inorganic fertilization (Hiremath and Patel, 1996). The present investigation was conducted to know the effect of various treatments of soybean, maize and sunhemp (as green manure) on carbon sequestration impact in vertisols. Methodology A field experiment was conducted during the kharif season of 2017-18 atCollege of Agriculture, Indore, India. The experiment was carried out with 8 treatments and replicated thrice in a randomized block design (RBD). The treatments includedsoybean + sunhemp (2:1) 436 | Page Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming, INM, soil-microorganisms-plant interactions
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad at 30 cm; soybean + sunhemp (1:1) at 45 cm; sole soybean at 45 cm; maize + sunhemp (2:1) at 45 cm; maize + sunhemp (1:1) at 30 cm; sole maize at 60 cm; soybean + maize (1:1) at 45 cm; sole sunhemp at 30 cm. The green manuring crop sunhemp, soybean (cv. JS 95- 60) and maize (cv. K 604 Hybrid) were sown in the last week of June. The soybean and maize were grown with 20:60:40 and 120:60:40 kg ha -1 recommended dose of N: P2O5:K2O, respectively. The sunhemp was incorporated in the first week of August. Results In 0- 15 cm soil depth, highest soil moisture content was observed in the treatment sole sunhemp at 30 cm followed by treatment Soybean + sunhemp (1:1) at 45 cm. The sole sunhemp cropping registered 35-40% and 33-37% higher soil moisture in 0-15 and 15-30 cm soil depth, respectively as compared to sole soybean and maize crop. The intercropping also showed 20-26% higher soil moisture in different depths as compared to sole cropping. The soil bulk density was found lowest in the treatment of sole sunhemp at 30 cm significantly reduced over the other treatments. The soil porosity analyzed after harvest of the crops ranged between 47.4% in treatment of sole Maize at 60 cm and 51.3% in treatment of sole sunhemp at 30 cm. The soil porosity remained unaffected irrespective either intercropping and/or green manuring. The treatments soybean + sunhemp (2:1) at 30 cm, Soybean + sunhemp (1:1) at 45 cmand sole sunhemp at 30 cm were found to be statistically at par with respect to the MWD but significantly superior over the other treatments under study. The increase in MWD of soil mainly attributed to the increase in soil organic carbon content (Tiarkset al., 1974). The soil pH remained unaffected irrespective either intercropping and/or green manuring. The treatment sole sunhemp at 30 cm, soybean + sunhemp (1:1) at 45 cm, Soybean + sunhemp (2:1) at 30 cm, maize + sunhemp (2:1) at 45 cm and maize + sunhemp (1:1) at 30 cm recorded significantly higher soil organic carbon as compared to the other treatments. The highest bacterial population was observed under the treatment sole sunhemp at 30 cm, whereas, the lowest was observed under sole maize cultivation at 60 cm row to row spacing. The highest fungal and actinomycetes population was found under sole green manure cropping i.e. treatment sole sunhemp at 30 cm, whereas the lowest was observed under Soybean + Maize (1:1) at 45 cm and sole soybean at 45 cm, respectively. The enhanced microbial population upon application of different sources of organic matter is in close agreement with present results (Aheret al., 2018). The incorporation of sunhemp as green manure crop intercropped with soybean and maize showed positive response on physico-chemical and microbial properties of soil. Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming, INM, soil-microorganisms-plant interactions 437 | Page
- Page 398 and 399: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 400 and 401: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 402 and 403: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 404 and 405: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 406 and 407: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 408 and 409: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 410 and 411: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 412 and 413: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 414 and 415: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 416 and 417: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 418 and 419: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 420 and 421: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 422 and 423: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 424 and 425: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 426 and 427: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 428 and 429: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 430 and 431: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 432 and 433: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 434 and 435: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 436 and 437: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 438 and 439: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 440 and 441: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 442 and 443: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 444 and 445: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 446 and 447: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 450 and 451: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 452 and 453: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 454 and 455: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 456 and 457: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 458 and 459: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 460 and 461: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 462 and 463: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 464 and 465: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 466 and 467: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 468 and 469: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 470 and 471: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 472 and 473: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 475 and 476: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 477 and 478: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 479 and 480: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 481 and 482: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 483 and 484: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 485 and 486: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 487 and 488: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 489 and 490: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 491 and 492: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 493 and 494: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 495 and 496: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 497 and 498: International Conference on Reimagi
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
at 30 cm; soybean + sunhemp (1:1) at 45 cm; sole soybean at 45 cm; maize + sunhemp (2:1)<br />
at 45 cm; maize + sunhemp (1:1) at 30 cm; sole maize at 60 cm; soybean + maize (1:1) at 45<br />
cm; sole sunhemp at 30 cm. The green manuring crop sunhemp, soybean (cv. JS 95- 60) and<br />
maize (cv. K 604 Hybrid) were sown in the last week <strong>of</strong> June. The soybean and maize were<br />
grown with 20:60:40 and 120:60:40 kg ha -1 recommended dose <strong>of</strong> N: P2O5:K2O,<br />
respectively. The sunhemp was incorporated in the first week <strong>of</strong> August.<br />
Results<br />
In 0- 15 cm soil depth, highest soil moisture content was observed in the treatment sole<br />
sunhemp at 30 cm followed by treatment Soybean + sunhemp (1:1) at 45 cm. The sole<br />
sunhemp cropping registered 35-40% and 33-37% higher soil moisture in 0-15 and 15-30 cm<br />
soil depth, respectively as compared to sole soybean and maize crop. The intercropping also<br />
showed 20-26% higher soil moisture in different depths as compared to sole cropping. The<br />
soil bulk density was found lowest in the treatment <strong>of</strong> sole sunhemp at 30 cm significantly<br />
reduced over the other treatments. The soil porosity analyzed after harvest <strong>of</strong> the crops<br />
ranged between 47.4% in treatment <strong>of</strong> sole Maize at 60 cm and 51.3% in treatment <strong>of</strong> sole<br />
sunhemp at 30 cm. The soil porosity remained unaffected irrespective either intercropping<br />
and/or green manuring. The treatments soybean + sunhemp (2:1) at 30 cm, Soybean +<br />
sunhemp (1:1) at 45 cmand sole sunhemp at 30 cm were found to be statistically at par with<br />
respect to the MWD but significantly superior over the other treatments under study. The<br />
increase in MWD <strong>of</strong> soil mainly attributed to the increase in soil organic carbon content<br />
(Tiarkset al., 1974).<br />
The soil pH remained unaffected irrespective either intercropping and/or green manuring.<br />
The treatment sole sunhemp at 30 cm, soybean + sunhemp (1:1) at 45 cm, Soybean +<br />
sunhemp (2:1) at 30 cm, maize + sunhemp (2:1) at 45 cm and maize + sunhemp (1:1) at 30<br />
cm recorded significantly higher soil organic carbon as compared to the other treatments. The<br />
highest bacterial population was observed under the treatment sole sunhemp at 30 cm,<br />
whereas, the lowest was observed under sole maize cultivation at 60 cm row to row spacing.<br />
The highest fungal and actinomycetes population was found under sole green manure<br />
cropping i.e. treatment sole sunhemp at 30 cm, whereas the lowest was observed under<br />
Soybean + Maize (1:1) at 45 cm and sole soybean at 45 cm, respectively.<br />
The enhanced microbial population upon application <strong>of</strong> different sources <strong>of</strong> organic matter is<br />
in close agreement with present results (Aheret al., 2018). The incorporation <strong>of</strong> sunhemp as<br />
green manure crop intercropped with soybean and maize showed positive response on<br />
physico-chemical and microbial properties <strong>of</strong> soil.<br />
Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming,<br />
INM, soil-microorganisms-plant interactions<br />
437 | Page