Book of Extended summaries ISDA
Book of Extended summaries ISDA Book of Extended summaries ISDA
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad 150 Count 100 50 0 3 5 Score 7 9 Graphical distribution of genotypes falling under different salt tolerance levels References Ali, S., Gautam, R.K., Mahajan, R., Krishnamurthy, S.L., Sharma, S.K., Singh, R.K. and Ismail, A.M., 2013. Stress indices and selectable traits in SALTOL QTL introgressed rice genotypes for reproductive stage tolerance to sodicity and salinity stresses. Field Crops Res., 154: 65-73. Gregoria, G.B., Senadhira, D. and Mendoza, R.D., 1997. Screening rice for salinity tolerance (No. 2169-2019-1605). Krishnamurthy, S.L., Pundir, P., Warraich, A.S., Rathor, S., Lokeshkumar, B.M., Singh, N.K. and Sharma, P.C., 2020. Introgressed saltol QTL lines improves the salinity tolerance in rice at seedling stage. Front. Plant Sci, 11: 833. Yoshida, S., Forno, D.A., Cock, J.K. and Gomez, K.A., 1976. Routine procedure for growing rice plants in culture solution. In: Laboratory manual for physiological studies of rice. 3rd edn. The International Rice Research Institute, Los Banos, Laguna, Philippines, pp 61–65. T3-22P-1543 Evaluation of Newer Insecticides Against Safflower Aphid, Uroleucon Compositae (Theobald) S.M. Gangurde, P.S. Neharkar, S.D. Bantewad and P.R. Zanwar Department of Agricultural Entomology, Vasantrao Naik Marathwada Krishi Vidyapeeth, Parbhani-431 402 (M.S.) -India Safflower, Carthamus tinctorius Linn. is the most important oilseed crop growing in the rabi season. The safflower crop is damaged by as high as 79 insect pests. The safflower aphid (Uroleucon Compositae Theobald) is the regular and most destructive pest in India. Therefore, it is the most important pest of safflower. Safflower aphids can be controlled by different insecticides recommended by many workers. Thiamethoxam 25 WG @ 50, 70, and 100 381 | Page Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad g.a.i./ha were found most effective than imidacloprid 17.8 SL and dimethoate 30 EC in reducing aphid population. Akashe et al. (2007) reported that thiamethoxam 0.005 percent was effective in the control of safflower aphids. The indiscriminate and frequent application of insecticides has created resistance development in the target pest, the presence of pesticide residues in seed and oil, destruction of natural enemies and different pollinators. It was, therefore necessary to evaluate the efficacy of different seed treatment insecticides as well as foliar application of insecticides to find out the insecticides harmful to the aphids and safer to the natural enemies and pollinators, especially honeybees. Therefore, the seed treatment insecticides and newer insecticides were evaluated to manage safflower aphids. Methodology A field trial was carried out to test the efficacy of insecticides against safflower aphids during the rabi season of 2020-21 and 2021-22 at the Research Farm of the Department of Agricultural Entomology, Vasantrao Naik Marathwada Krishi Vidyapeeth, Parbhani. The Seed treatment with imidacloprid 48 FS and thiamethoxam 30 FS was done before sowing and soil drenching of clothianidin 50 WDG was done 15 days after sowing as per the treatment. The sowing of safflower variety PBNS-12 was done in randomized block design with three replications by dibbling at a spacing of 45x20 cm. The first spray of insecticides was applied on the appearance of a sufficient population of safflower aphids while the second spray was given at an interval of 15 days as per the treatment. The observations on the number of aphids per 5 cm apical shoot length per plant were recorded a day before as a precount and 5, 7, 10, and 14 days after spraying of insecticide on five randomly selected plants from each plot. The seed yield of safflower from each plot was recorded separately at harvesting and the data on aphid count and seed yield were statistically analyzed as per the method suggested by Panse and Sukhatme (1965). Sr. No. Treatment Treatment details Dose 1 Seed treatment with imidacloprid 48 FS 9 ml/kg seed 2 Seed treatment with thiamethoxam 30 FS 10 ml/kg seed 3 Soil drenching with clothianidin 50 WDG 2.5 g/10 lit. water 4 Seed treatment with imidacloprid 48 FS and one foliar spray of spinetoram11.70 SC 5 Seed treatment with imidacloprid 48 FS and one foliar spray of cyantraniliprole 10.26 OD 6 Seed treatment with thiamethoxam 30 FS and one foliar spray of spinetoram11.70 SC 9 ml/kg seed and 420 ml/ha 9 ml/kg seed and 900 ml/ha 10 ml/kg seed and 420 ml/ha Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance 382 | Page
- Page 342 and 343: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 344 and 345: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 346 and 347: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 348 and 349: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 350 and 351: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 352 and 353: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 354 and 355: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 356 and 357: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 358 and 359: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 360 and 361: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 362 and 363: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 364 and 365: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 366 and 367: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 368 and 369: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 370 and 371: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 372 and 373: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 374 and 375: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 376 and 377: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 378 and 379: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 380 and 381: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 382 and 383: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 384 and 385: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 386 and 387: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 388 and 389: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 390 and 391: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 394 and 395: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 396 and 397: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 398 and 399: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 400 and 401: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 402 and 403: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 404 and 405: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 406 and 407: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 408 and 409: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 410 and 411: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 412 and 413: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 414 and 415: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 416 and 417: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 418 and 419: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 420 and 421: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 422 and 423: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 424 and 425: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 426 and 427: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 428 and 429: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 430 and 431: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 432 and 433: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 434 and 435: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 436 and 437: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 438 and 439: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 440 and 441: International Conference on Reimagi
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
g.a.i./ha were found most effective than imidacloprid 17.8 SL and dimethoate 30 EC in<br />
reducing aphid population. Akashe et al. (2007) reported that thiamethoxam 0.005 percent was<br />
effective in the control <strong>of</strong> safflower aphids. The indiscriminate and frequent application <strong>of</strong><br />
insecticides has created resistance development in the target pest, the presence <strong>of</strong> pesticide<br />
residues in seed and oil, destruction <strong>of</strong> natural enemies and different pollinators. It was,<br />
therefore necessary to evaluate the efficacy <strong>of</strong> different seed treatment insecticides as well as<br />
foliar application <strong>of</strong> insecticides to find out the insecticides harmful to the aphids and safer to<br />
the natural enemies and pollinators, especially honeybees. Therefore, the seed treatment<br />
insecticides and newer insecticides were evaluated to manage safflower aphids.<br />
Methodology<br />
A field trial was carried out to test the efficacy <strong>of</strong> insecticides against safflower aphids during<br />
the rabi season <strong>of</strong> 2020-21 and 2021-22 at the Research Farm <strong>of</strong> the Department <strong>of</strong> Agricultural<br />
Entomology, Vasantrao Naik Marathwada Krishi Vidyapeeth, Parbhani. The Seed treatment<br />
with imidacloprid 48 FS and thiamethoxam 30 FS was done before sowing and soil drenching<br />
<strong>of</strong> clothianidin 50 WDG was done 15 days after sowing as per the treatment. The sowing <strong>of</strong><br />
safflower variety PBNS-12 was done in randomized block design with three replications by<br />
dibbling at a spacing <strong>of</strong> 45x20 cm. The first spray <strong>of</strong> insecticides was applied on the appearance<br />
<strong>of</strong> a sufficient population <strong>of</strong> safflower aphids while the second spray was given at an interval<br />
<strong>of</strong> 15 days as per the treatment. The observations on the number <strong>of</strong> aphids per 5 cm apical shoot<br />
length per plant were recorded a day before as a precount and 5, 7, 10, and 14 days after<br />
spraying <strong>of</strong> insecticide on five randomly selected plants from each plot. The seed yield <strong>of</strong><br />
safflower from each plot was recorded separately at harvesting and the data on aphid count and<br />
seed yield were statistically analyzed as per the method suggested by Panse and Sukhatme<br />
(1965).<br />
Sr.<br />
No.<br />
Treatment<br />
Treatment details<br />
Dose<br />
1 Seed treatment with imidacloprid 48 FS 9 ml/kg seed<br />
2 Seed treatment with thiamethoxam 30 FS 10 ml/kg seed<br />
3 Soil drenching with clothianidin 50 WDG 2.5 g/10 lit. water<br />
4 Seed treatment with imidacloprid 48 FS and one foliar spray<br />
<strong>of</strong> spinetoram11.70 SC<br />
5 Seed treatment with imidacloprid 48 FS and one foliar spray<br />
<strong>of</strong> cyantraniliprole 10.26 OD<br />
6 Seed treatment with thiamethoxam 30 FS and one foliar spray<br />
<strong>of</strong> spinetoram11.70 SC<br />
9 ml/kg seed and 420 ml/ha<br />
9 ml/kg seed and 900 ml/ha<br />
10 ml/kg seed and 420 ml/ha<br />
Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance<br />
382 | Page