Book of Extended summaries ISDA
Book of Extended summaries ISDA Book of Extended summaries ISDA
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad T3-21P-1420 Evaluation of F3:4 Population for Seedling Stage Salinity Tolerance in Rice (Oryza sativa L.) M. Vani Praveena, P. Venkata Ramana Rao, B. Jyothi, Ch. Sreenivas and D. Ramesh Agricultural college, Bapatla, ANGRAU RARS, Maruteru-534122, ANGRAU ICAR-Indian Institute of Rice Research (ICAR-IIRR), Rajendranagar, Hyderbad-500030 Rice (Oryza sativa L.) is most widely consumed cereal crop with its demand expected to increase by 38% within 30 years (Ali et al. 2013). With increasing world population, there is a necessity to increase overall grain production by 1.5% every year, requiring a 35% increase in production by 2030 and greater than 70% by 2050. Hence, improving rice productivity is critical to maintain economic growth, food security and sustainable production. However, the increasing trend in rice production is severely hampered by various abiotic stresses arising due to climate change and environmental variabilities. In crop plants drought, salinity and alkalinity, nutrient toxicity or deficiency, flooding and poor drainage, high or low soil pH, high and low temperatures and heavy metals are some of the important abiotic stresses arising due to environmental factors which are complex thus limiting the crop production globally. Among these, drought and salinity have high impact on rice productivity, salinity being second important abiotic stress in rice after drought. In India about 6.73 million hectares of land is saltaffected, of which 3.77 and 2.96 million hectares are sodic and saline soils respectively. Rice is most sensitive to soil salinity at both vegetative and reproductive stages. At the seedling stage, salinity causes poor rice crop establishment, shorter roots/shoots, and smaller leaves leading to early plant mortality. Therefore, understanding seedling stage salinity tolerance is very important for early plant establishment under saline stress which could help the plant to achieve good vegetative growth later. So, the objective of the present investigation is to evaluate F3:4 population for seedling stage salinity tolerance and to identify the tolerant lines. Methodology A total of 205 F 3:4 population with two parents i.e., MTU 1061 (salt tolerant) and MTU 1121 (salt susceptible) were screened for salinity tolerance at seedling stage in greenhouse following the standard protocol of IRRI with some modifications (Gregorio et al., 1997). The screening experiment was conducted in a complete randomized design with 2 replications. Two pregerminated seeds of 205 F3:4 lines with parents (MTU 1061 and MTU 1121) and checks (MTU 1010 and FL 478) were placed on the styrofoam seedling float. A total 24 styrofoam sheets were used for screening all the 204 F3:4 lines. The seedling floats were placed inside the greenhouse. Initially, the seedlings were grown in normal water for two days, followed by nutrient solution for following two days in Yoshida medium (Yoshida et al., 1976). When the 379 | Page Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad seedlings were at two leaf stage, they were subjected to initial salinity stress of EC=6 dSm -1 by adding NaCl to nutrient solution and the pH was adjusted to 5.0. After eight days of initial salinization, the EC was increased to 12 dSm -1 . Initial scoring of the selected individual plants was recorded at 10 days after initial salinization as per SES of IRRI (1997). The description of the standard evaluation score of 1 - 9 was presented in Table. The final score was recorded at 16 days after initial salinization. Standard evaluation score (SES) of visual salt injury at seedling stage Score Observation Tolerance 1 Normal growth, no leaf symptoms Highly tolerant 3 Nearly normal growth, but leaf tips or few leaves whitish and rolled Tolerant 5 Growth severely retarded, most leaves rolled; only a few are elongating Moderately Tolerant 7 Complete cessation of growth; most leaves dry; some plants drying Susceptible 9 Almost all plants dead or dying Highly susceptible Results F3:4 families were categorized according to standard evaluation scores recorded and presented in the Table 1 and Figure. In the present study, 204 F3:4 individuals derived from the cross between salt tolerant parent MTU1061 and salt susceptible parent MTU1121 were screened for salt tolerance at seedling stage following hydroponics system at two stress levels (EC=6 dS/m and EC=12 dS/m). Out of 204 genotypes screened for salt tolerance twelve genotypes showed tolerant reaction with SES of 3, forty-seven genotypes showed moderately tolerant reaction with a score of 5 and twenty-four genotypes showed highly susceptible reaction with a score of 9. More than hundred genotypes manifested susceptible reaction with salt evaluation score of 7. Salt tolerance is governed by multiple factors, tolerant reaction of the genotypes in this study might be attributed by mechanisms like tissue tolerance, ion exclusion, compartmentalization, activity of different growth regulators, transcriptional factors and several stress combating pathways (Krishnamurthy et al., 2020). Reaction of F 3:4 families against seedling stage salinity Score Count Salt tolerance 3 12 Tolerant 5 47 Moderately tolerant 7 121 Moderately susceptible 9 24 Highly susceptible Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance 380 | Page
- Page 340 and 341: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 342 and 343: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 344 and 345: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 346 and 347: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 348 and 349: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 350 and 351: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 352 and 353: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 354 and 355: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 356 and 357: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 358 and 359: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 360 and 361: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 362 and 363: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 364 and 365: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 366 and 367: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 368 and 369: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 370 and 371: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 372 and 373: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 374 and 375: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 376 and 377: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 378 and 379: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 380 and 381: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 382 and 383: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 384 and 385: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 386 and 387: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 388 and 389: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 392 and 393: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 394 and 395: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 396 and 397: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 398 and 399: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 400 and 401: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 402 and 403: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 404 and 405: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 406 and 407: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 408 and 409: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 410 and 411: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 412 and 413: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 414 and 415: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 416 and 417: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 418 and 419: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 420 and 421: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 422 and 423: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 424 and 425: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 426 and 427: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 428 and 429: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 430 and 431: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 432 and 433: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 434 and 435: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 436 and 437: International Conference on Reimagi
- Page 438 and 439: International Conference on Reimagi
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
seedlings were at two leaf stage, they were subjected to initial salinity stress <strong>of</strong> EC=6 dSm -1 by<br />
adding NaCl to nutrient solution and the pH was adjusted to 5.0. After eight days <strong>of</strong> initial<br />
salinization, the EC was increased to 12 dSm -1 . Initial scoring <strong>of</strong> the selected individual plants<br />
was recorded at 10 days after initial salinization as per SES <strong>of</strong> IRRI (1997). The description <strong>of</strong><br />
the standard evaluation score <strong>of</strong> 1 - 9 was presented in Table. The final score was recorded at<br />
16 days after initial salinization.<br />
Standard evaluation score (SES) <strong>of</strong> visual salt injury at seedling stage<br />
Score Observation Tolerance<br />
1 Normal growth, no leaf symptoms Highly tolerant<br />
3 Nearly normal growth, but leaf tips or few leaves whitish and rolled Tolerant<br />
5 Growth severely retarded, most leaves rolled; only a few are<br />
elongating<br />
Moderately Tolerant<br />
7 Complete cessation <strong>of</strong> growth; most leaves dry; some plants drying Susceptible<br />
9 Almost all plants dead or dying Highly susceptible<br />
Results<br />
F3:4 families were categorized according to standard evaluation scores recorded and presented in<br />
the Table 1 and Figure. In the present study, 204 F3:4 individuals derived from the cross between<br />
salt tolerant parent MTU1061 and salt susceptible parent MTU1121 were screened for salt<br />
tolerance at seedling stage following hydroponics system at two stress levels (EC=6 dS/m and<br />
EC=12 dS/m). Out <strong>of</strong> 204 genotypes screened for salt tolerance twelve genotypes showed tolerant<br />
reaction with SES <strong>of</strong> 3, forty-seven genotypes showed moderately tolerant reaction with a score <strong>of</strong><br />
5 and twenty-four genotypes showed highly susceptible reaction with a score <strong>of</strong> 9. More than<br />
hundred genotypes manifested susceptible reaction with salt evaluation score <strong>of</strong> 7. Salt tolerance is<br />
governed by multiple factors, tolerant reaction <strong>of</strong> the genotypes in this study might be attributed by<br />
mechanisms like tissue tolerance, ion exclusion, compartmentalization, activity <strong>of</strong> different growth<br />
regulators, transcriptional factors and several stress combating pathways (Krishnamurthy et al.,<br />
2020).<br />
Reaction <strong>of</strong> F 3:4 families against seedling stage salinity<br />
Score Count Salt tolerance<br />
3 12 Tolerant<br />
5 47 Moderately tolerant<br />
7 121 Moderately susceptible<br />
9 24 Highly susceptible<br />
Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance<br />
380 | Page