20.12.2022 Views

Book of Extended summaries ISDA

Book of Extended summaries ISDA

Book of Extended summaries ISDA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Results<br />

Among the various sequences, soybean equivalent yield <strong>of</strong> maize–chickpea cropping sequence<br />

was the highest (4153 q/ha), followed by maize-mustard (3293 q/ha) and maize–safflower<br />

sequence (3222 q/ha). Existing soybean-chickpea sequence recorded soybean equivalent yield<br />

<strong>of</strong> 2586 t/ha, which is 60.60% lesser than maize-chickpea cropping sequence. The maizechickpea<br />

cropping sequence also recorded the maximum net returns (Rs. 146890/ha) and B:C<br />

ratio (4.67) followed by maize-mustard (Rs.1,48,200/ha Rs.1,08,200/ha and 3.71, respectively)<br />

and maize–safflower sequence (Rs.1,44,990/ha Rs.1,04,990/ha and 3.62, respectively. While<br />

the, highest land use efficiency (98.63%) was noticed with maize-mustard followed by<br />

blackgram-mustard sequence. This might be due to increase in the yield <strong>of</strong> maize and chickpea<br />

under maize-chickpea cropping sequence resulting increase the returns over other cropping<br />

sequences. Higher system pr<strong>of</strong>itability may be attributed to higher productivity <strong>of</strong> maize than<br />

other kharif crops and lower duration <strong>of</strong> the crops in sequence. Similar findings were also<br />

reported by Prajapat et al. (2015) and Singh et al. (2019).<br />

Soybean equivalent yield (SEY), economics and various efficiencies as affected by<br />

Cropping sequence<br />

cropping sequences (Mean data <strong>of</strong> 3 years)<br />

SEY<br />

(kg/ha)<br />

Net<br />

returns <strong>of</strong><br />

system<br />

(Rs. /ha)<br />

B:C<br />

ratio<br />

Total<br />

duration<br />

(days)<br />

Land use<br />

efficiency<br />

(%)<br />

Relative<br />

Production<br />

efficiency<br />

(%)<br />

T 1-Soybean- chickpea 2586 76370 2.91 230 63.01 -<br />

T 2-Soybean- safflower 1606 32250 1.81 273 74.79 -37.91<br />

T 3-Soybean- mustard 1783 40220 2.01 259 70.96 -31.06<br />

T 4-Maize-chickpea 4153 146890 4.67 230 63.01 60.60<br />

T 5-Maize- safflower 3222 104990 3.62 273 74.79 24.59<br />

T 6-Maize- mustard 3293 108200 3.71 372 98.63 27.35<br />

T 7-Blackgram-chickpea 2314 64125 2.60 205 56.16 -10.52<br />

T 8-Blackgram - safflower 1481 26650 1.67 248 67.95 -42.73<br />

T 9-Blackgram - mustard 1444 24995 1.62 347 95.07 -44.15<br />

SEm+ 58 1678 0.07 - - -<br />

LSD (P=0.05) 168 4833 0.20 - - -<br />

References<br />

Singh, D.K., Singh, R., Singh, G.D., Singh, A.P., Chaturdevi, S., Singh, J.P., Rathi, A. and<br />

Singh, M. 2019. Diversification <strong>of</strong> rice (Oryza sativa)-wheat (Triticum aestivum)<br />

system and its influence on productivity, pr<strong>of</strong>itability and energetics under on-farm<br />

situation. Indian J. Agron., 62 (3): 255-259.<br />

339 | Page Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!