20.12.2022 Views

Book of Extended summaries ISDA

Book of Extended summaries ISDA

Book of Extended summaries ISDA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

No furrow 1.16 2.07 2.63 1.34 1.42 1.72<br />

RWUE<br />

(kg/hamm)<br />

Conservation<br />

furrow in Soybean<br />

4.14 5.50 1.78 2.36 2.21 3.19<br />

No furrow 3.19 4.5 1.53 1.58 1.7 2.50<br />

Results indicated that, with conservation furrow, a sole soybean yield <strong>of</strong> 1504 kg/ha was<br />

obtained with a yield advantage <strong>of</strong> 302 kg/ha over the treatment <strong>of</strong> no conservation furrow<br />

(1202 kg/ha). The net returns <strong>of</strong> Rs. 22571/ha was obtained due to adoption <strong>of</strong> conservation<br />

furrow technique and found to be higher than the net return <strong>of</strong> Rs. 18609 in no furrow system.<br />

The BC ratio under adoption <strong>of</strong> conservation furrow technique was found to be 2.14 as against<br />

BC ratio <strong>of</strong> 1.72 with no furrow system. Similarly, the RWUE <strong>of</strong> 3.19 was found with<br />

conservation furrow as compared to RWUE <strong>of</strong> 2.50 in no furrow system. The effect <strong>of</strong> in-situ<br />

moisture conservation practice like conservation furrow in sole soybean on crop productivity<br />

(yield), net monetary returns, BC ratio and RWUE was analyzed and the data is presented.<br />

Effect <strong>of</strong> conservation furrow on crop productivity, NMR, BC ratio and RWUE<br />

Yield<br />

(kg/ha)<br />

Net<br />

returns<br />

(kg/ha)<br />

B:C<br />

ratio<br />

Intervention/Year 2011-<br />

12<br />

Conservation furrow in<br />

Soy + PP (4:2)<br />

2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 Mean<br />

2900 1496 1610 513 1731 1650<br />

No furrow 1875 1160 1205 272 1430 1188<br />

Conservation furrow in<br />

Soy + PP (4:2)<br />

38840 38848 43180 16572 19840 31456<br />

No furrow 18750 26080 27790 8786 16390 19559<br />

Conservation furrow in<br />

Soy + PP (4:2)<br />

3.15 3.16 3.39 2.24 1.62 2.71<br />

RWUE<br />

(kg/hamm)<br />

No furrow 2.04 2.44 2.54 1.18 1.33 1.90<br />

Conservation furrow in<br />

Soy + PP (4:2)<br />

6.50 3.14 1.63 1.81 6.07 3.83<br />

No furrow 4.20 2.43 1.22 0.96 5.01 2.76<br />

In soybean + pigeonpea (4:2) intercropping system, an additional soybean equivalent yield <strong>of</strong><br />

462 kg/ha was obtained with adoption <strong>of</strong> conservation furrow technique as compared to no<br />

furrow with net monetary benefit <strong>of</strong> Rs. 11897/ha. The increase in yield and net return is due<br />

to 30 per cent more moisture conservation resulted in better crop growth and crop performance<br />

even during dry spells.<br />

Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance<br />

23 | Page

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!