20.12.2022 Views

Book of Extended summaries ISDA

Book of Extended summaries ISDA

Book of Extended summaries ISDA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Results<br />

The study reveals that grain yield, straw yield, and test weight are influenced significantly<br />

due to different treatments. In base crop treatment, sole kodo millet (T 7) recorded<br />

significantly higher grain, straw, and test weight among all the treatments but it was observed<br />

at par with kodo millet + pgeonpea 8:1 ratio (T3), kodo millet + pigeonpea 6:1 ratio (T2) and<br />

kodomillet + pigeonpea 4:1 ratio (T 1) in straw yield and test weight. Harvest index was<br />

recorded as not significant effect due to different treatments but numerically highest HI was<br />

observed in sole barnyard millet (T 8) among all treatments. Similar results were reported by<br />

Kuriet al. (2012). The highest LER was recorded in the treatment kodo millet + pigeonpea<br />

4:1 ratio (T1) which was found on par with kodo millet + pigeonpea 6:1 ratio (T2), kodo<br />

millet + pigeonpea 8:1 ratio (T 3) and barnyard millet + pigeonpea 8:1 ratio (T 6).<br />

Conclusion<br />

Land equivalent ratio and relative crowding co-efficient were produced highest in sole<br />

Kodomillet. Aggressively was recorded higher positive sign in Kodo+ pigeon pea 8:1 row<br />

ratio in base crop and intercrop; Kodomillet + pigeonpea 4:1 row ratio produced higher<br />

positive aggressivity, area time equivalent ratio and millet grain equivalent ratio.<br />

References:<br />

Keerthanapriya, S., Hemalatha, M., Joseph, M. and Prabina, B.J. 2019. Assessment <strong>of</strong><br />

competitiveness and yield advantages <strong>of</strong> little millet based intercropping system<br />

under rainfed condition. Int. J. Chem. Stud. 7(3): 4121-4124.<br />

Kuri, B. R., Yadav, R. S. and Kumawat, A. 2012. Evaluation <strong>of</strong> pear lmillet<br />

(Pennisetumglaucum) and moth bean (Vigna acconitifolia) intercropping systems in<br />

hyper arid partially irrigated north-western plains zone. Ind. J. Agric. Sci. 82(11):<br />

993-996.<br />

Patil, N. B., Halikatti, S. I., Sujay, Y.H., Kumar, P. Sanjay, B. H., Topagi, C. and Pushpa,<br />

V. 2010. Influence <strong>of</strong> intercropping on the growth and yield <strong>of</strong> little millet and<br />

pigeonpea. Int. J. Agric. Sci. 6(2): 602-604.<br />

Triveni, U., Sandhya Rani, Y., Patro, T. S. S. K., Anuradha, N. and Divya, M. 2017.<br />

Evaluation <strong>of</strong> different finger millet based intercropping systems in the north<br />

coastal zone <strong>of</strong> Andhra Pradesh. Int. J. Cosmet. Sci. (5), pp.828-831.<br />

Ecosystem based approaches for climate change adaptation, ecosystem services, integrated farming system<br />

models, Land degradation neutrality<br />

179 | Page

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!