20.12.2022 Views

Book of Extended summaries ISDA

Book of Extended summaries ISDA

Book of Extended summaries ISDA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

7864 eggs were produced annually <strong>of</strong> which family requirement is 1500 eggs year -1 . Annual<br />

meat production from IFS was 160 kgs (live birds weight). The total fish biomass production<br />

was 759 kg from 0.1 ha area <strong>of</strong> pond. IFS provided farmer’s family, an excellent quality <strong>of</strong><br />

protein from fish and meat, which he was unable to purchase due to his low purchasing<br />

power. The high nutritional value <strong>of</strong> egg, fish, milk, meat overcome the undernourishment <strong>of</strong><br />

vulnerable groups such as infants and pre-school children, pregnant and lactating women<br />

(Edwards, 2000). The results (table 2) indicated that out <strong>of</strong> total production <strong>of</strong> cereals,<br />

vegetables, fruits, oilseed and milk, 55, 71, 77, 68 and 93% was marketable surplus,<br />

respectively. An IFS is more secure in the supply <strong>of</strong> food as it has a diversified/greater<br />

number <strong>of</strong> food species than the commercial farming system (Behera et al., 2018). Farmers<br />

could ‘grow everything they eat and eat everything they grow’, which reflects the King’s<br />

philosophy <strong>of</strong> self-sufficiency. Apart from increased household nutrition and income, the<br />

added benefits <strong>of</strong> IFS are local availability <strong>of</strong> fresh products and the provision <strong>of</strong> employment<br />

for household members (Bhargavi and Behera, 2020).<br />

Annual production and surplus <strong>of</strong> farm produce in IFS<br />

S. No. Produce Annual production Annual family requirement<br />

(kg)<br />

Annual<br />

(kg)<br />

1. Cereals 1444 kg 654 (45) 790 (55)<br />

2. Pulses 150 kg 109 (73) 41 (27)<br />

3. Vegetables 2045 kg 584 (29) 1461 (71)<br />

4. Fruits 802 kg 182 (23) 620 (77)<br />

5. Oilseed 113 kg 36 (32) 77 (68)<br />

6. Milk 11553 litres 766 (7) 10787 (93)<br />

7. Egg 7864 No. 1500 (23) 7864 (77)<br />

*values in parentheses indicate the percentage <strong>of</strong> total production<br />

Conclusion<br />

surplus<br />

IFS produced diverse food products i.e., 6 field crops produce, 6 vegetables, 5 fruits, milk,<br />

eggs, meat and fish. Out <strong>of</strong> total production <strong>of</strong> cereals, vegetables, fruits, oilseed and milk,<br />

45, 29, 23, 32 and 7% was family requirement and the rest 55, 71, 77, 68 and 93% was<br />

marketable surplus respectively. IFS make the farmer self-sufficient in terms <strong>of</strong> ensuring<br />

family members a balanced diet for leading a healthy life. Further direct benefits from IFS,<br />

apart from increased household nutrition and income, are local availability <strong>of</strong> fresh products<br />

and the provision <strong>of</strong> employment for household members.<br />

References<br />

Ecosystem based approaches for climate change adaptation, ecosystem services, integrated farming system<br />

models, Land degradation neutrality<br />

171 | Page

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!