20.12.2022 Views

Book of Extended summaries ISDA

Book of Extended summaries ISDA

Book of Extended summaries ISDA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Gross area (acres) 1 3 4 2<br />

Volume <strong>of</strong> water (Mcum) 2 1 4 3<br />

Command area (acres) 1 2 4 3<br />

Total Volume <strong>of</strong> water (Mcum) 2 1 4 3<br />

Water demand (Mcum) 2 1 3 4<br />

Rf (Cum) 2 3 1 4<br />

Dp (Cum) 2 1 4 3<br />

Area (ha) 1 3 4 2<br />

Research station yield (kg/ha) 1 2 3 4<br />

RS1 14 17 31 28<br />

RS2 16 19 14 20<br />

Over-all rank sum 30 36 45 48<br />

Results<br />

Based on the study, we have assessed the superiority <strong>of</strong> performance <strong>of</strong> four commands <strong>of</strong><br />

Telugu Ganga Project in Chittoor, Nellore, Kurnool and Kadapa districts in Andhra Pradesh<br />

using standard performance indicators like Equity, Uniformity, Irrigation intensity, Overall<br />

consumed ratio/efficiency, Adequacy, Yield (kg/ha), Yield (kg/m 3 ), Yield (kg/m 3 ) <strong>of</strong> Eto and<br />

Crop yield ratio observed during 2013 to 2019. The indicators were assessed in two groups<br />

viz., RS1 and RS2 where RS1 comprised <strong>of</strong> (i) Equity, (ii) Uniformity, (iii) Irrigation, (iv)<br />

Over-all consumed ratio/Efficiency, (v) Adequacy, (vi) Yield and (vii) Crop yield ratio, while<br />

RS2 comprised <strong>of</strong> (i) Gross area, (ii) Volume <strong>of</strong> water, (iii) Command area, (iv) Total Volume<br />

<strong>of</strong> water, (v) Water demand, (vi) Rf, (vii) Dp, (viii) Area and (ix) Research station yield. Based<br />

on RS1 group <strong>of</strong> indicators, Nellore was superior with best performance for all indicators<br />

having lowest rank sum <strong>of</strong> 14. Kurnool command was the 2 nd best with rank sum <strong>of</strong> 17, while<br />

Kadapa and Chittoor had a rank sum <strong>of</strong> 28 and 31 respectively. Based on RS2 group, Chittoor<br />

was superior for all indicators with minimum rank sum <strong>of</strong> 14, followed by Nellore with 16,<br />

Kurnool with 19 and Kadapa with rank sum <strong>of</strong> 20. When we considered both groups, Nellore<br />

was superior with minimum rank sum <strong>of</strong> 30, followed by Kurnool, Chittoor and Kadapa with<br />

rank sum <strong>of</strong> 36, 45 and 48 respectively in the TGP command.<br />

References<br />

Bos, M.G., Murray, R.D.H., Merry, D., Jonson, H.G. and Snellers, W.B. 1994. Methodologies<br />

for assessing performance <strong>of</strong> irrigation and drainage management. Irrig. Drain. Syst.,<br />

7: 231-261.<br />

Narasimha, K., Girija, P., Ravi, S., and Suresh, M. 2017. Evaluate the cropping pattern in the<br />

command areas using satellite Remote sensing techniques <strong>of</strong> Godavari basin major<br />

irrigation projects. Int. J. Adv. Res. Publ., 5(7):1719-1725.<br />

96 | Page Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!