20.12.2022 Views

Book of Extended summaries ISDA

Book of Extended summaries ISDA

Book of Extended summaries ISDA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Extended</strong> Summaries<br />

22-24 December, 2022<br />

Supported by<br />

Department <strong>of</strong><br />

Science &<br />

Technology<br />

Government <strong>of</strong><br />

India<br />

Organized by<br />

Indian Society <strong>of</strong> Dryland Agriculture<br />

ICAR-Central Research Ins tute for Dryland Agriculture<br />

Indian Council <strong>of</strong> Agricultural Research


<strong>Extended</strong> Summaries<br />

First International Conference<br />

Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems:<br />

Challenges & Opportunities<br />

22 – 24 December 2022<br />

Edited by<br />

C A Rama Rao, M Srinivasa Rao, S Suvana, A K Shanker, G Pratibha,<br />

R Rejani, S Kundu, H B Santosh, B V Asewar, J Rohit, K V Rao & V K Singh<br />

Organized by<br />

Indian Society <strong>of</strong> Dryland Agriculture<br />

ICAR-Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture<br />

Indian Council <strong>of</strong> Agricultural Research


Citation<br />

Rama Rao, C.A., Srinivasa Rao, M., Suvana S, Shanker, A.K., Pratibha, G., Rejani, R., Kundu, S.,<br />

Santosh, H.B., Asewar, B.V., Rohit, J., Rao, K.V. & Singh, V.K. 2022. First International Conference in<br />

‘Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges and Opportunities’. <strong>Extended</strong> Summaries. Indian<br />

Society <strong>of</strong> Dryland Agriculture, Hyderabad. p. 915.<br />

© Indian Society <strong>of</strong> Dryland Agriculture (<strong>ISDA</strong>), Hyderabad<br />

December 2022<br />

Published by<br />

Organizing Secretary<br />

First International Conference<br />

ICAR-CRIDA<br />

Hyderabad 500059<br />

ISBN: 978-93-80883-67-0<br />

Copyright © 2022 Indian Society <strong>of</strong> Dryland Agriculture, <strong>ISDA</strong> &<br />

ICAR- Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, CRIDA<br />

Assisted by:<br />

Girish, P., Gayatri, D.L.A, Navya, M., A Siva Kumar., Samba Shiva, G., Lokesh,<br />

G., Deepika, S. Kalyan, Pratyusha G.S.<br />

Disclaimer: The views expressed in this publication by the authors are their own and these do not<br />

necessarily reflect those <strong>of</strong> the organizers / sponsors or their respective institutes.


Contents<br />

Theme Title Page No.<br />

1 Resilience through land and water management<br />

interventions, water management and governance<br />

2 Ecosystem based approaches for climate change<br />

adaptation, ecosystem services, integrated farming<br />

system models, Land degradation neutrality<br />

1-139<br />

140-235<br />

2a Climate resilient agriculture for risk mitigation 236-330<br />

3 Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress<br />

tolerance<br />

4 Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed<br />

agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic<br />

farming, INM, soil-microorganisms-plant<br />

interactions<br />

331-429<br />

430-557<br />

4a Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture 558-693<br />

5 Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for<br />

crop management & assessment<br />

6 Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated<br />

and enhanced impacts<br />

694-793<br />

794-915


Resilience through land and water<br />

management interventions, water<br />

management and governance<br />

Theme– 1


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Theme – 1: Resilience through land and water management<br />

interventions, water management and governance<br />

List <strong>of</strong> <strong>Extended</strong> Summaries<br />

S.No Title First Author ID<br />

1. Low-Cost Tube-well Recharge Technology<br />

for Enhancing Water Availability<br />

2. Modified Agronomic Practices for<br />

Enhancing Efficiency <strong>of</strong> Hydrogels in<br />

Groundnut under Semi-arid Ecologies <strong>of</strong><br />

Andhra Pradesh<br />

3. Farm Ponds in Semi-Arid Region <strong>of</strong><br />

Maharashtra<br />

4. Climate Resilience Through Inclusive Water<br />

Management Over A Decade: A Successful<br />

Case Study <strong>of</strong> Yelerampura Gram<br />

Panchayat, Tumakuru District, Karnataka<br />

5. Resilience through water conservation and<br />

adoption <strong>of</strong> drought tolerant crop variety in<br />

NICRA village Gunia, Gumla, Jharkhand<br />

6. Transforming agriculture through<br />

Hydroponics: An innovative water-efficient<br />

technology for rainfed areas<br />

7. Enhancing Water Productivity in Rainfed<br />

Agriculture through in-situ and ex-situ Rain<br />

Water Harvesting- NICRA Experiences<br />

8. Enhancement <strong>of</strong> Rainfed Cotton Production<br />

Through Supplemental Irrigation in<br />

Vertisols Tract <strong>of</strong> Southern Tamil Nadu<br />

9. Enhancing Climate Resilient Agriculture in<br />

Semi-Arid Region through Group Micro<br />

Irrigation by Collectivization and Equitable<br />

Sharing <strong>of</strong> Groundwater: Case Study in<br />

Maharashtra and Telangana, India<br />

10. Soil Preferential Flow: A Case Study from<br />

Semi-arid Watershed<br />

11. Micro-Irrigation Based Supplemental<br />

Irrigation Using Harvested Rainwater for<br />

Sustainable Agriculture Under Rainfed<br />

Ecosystems<br />

12. Increasing the Productivity <strong>of</strong> Rainfed Rice-<br />

Based Double Cropping System Through<br />

Supplemental Irrigation Under Medium<br />

Lowland Situation <strong>of</strong> North Bank Plains<br />

Zone (NBPZ) <strong>of</strong> Assam<br />

Navab Singh<br />

GA Rajanna<br />

Sarita Chemburkar<br />

Ramesh<br />

T1-01O-1003<br />

T1-02O-1125<br />

T1-03O-1133<br />

T1-04O-1181<br />

Sanjay Kumar T1-05 O-1189<br />

Ankur Agarwal<br />

BV Asewar<br />

M Manikandan<br />

Arun Bhagat<br />

Pushpanjali<br />

Abrar Yousuf<br />

Arun Jyothi<br />

T1-05aO-1375<br />

T1-05bO-1161<br />

T1-06R-1005<br />

T1-07R-1062<br />

T1-08R-1149<br />

T1-09R-1172<br />

T1-10R-1382<br />

Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance<br />

1 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

S.No Title First Author ID<br />

13. Evaluation <strong>of</strong> In Situ Moisture Conservation<br />

Techniques for Sustainable Productivity <strong>of</strong><br />

Chick pea in Bundelkhand Region<br />

CM Tripathi<br />

T1-11R-1402<br />

14. Jalkund: Low-cost water harvesting<br />

structure for sustainable livelihood in rainfed<br />

agroecosystem <strong>of</strong> Chandel district, Manipur,<br />

India<br />

15. Effect <strong>of</strong> Hydrogel and Organic Manures to<br />

Mitigate Abiotic Stress in Groundnut Under<br />

Rainfed Conditions <strong>of</strong> Saurashtra Region<br />

16. Straw Mulching as Climate Resilience<br />

Measure for In-situ Water Management and<br />

enhancing Productivity <strong>of</strong> Rainfed Soybean<br />

17. Irrigation Requirement <strong>of</strong> Major Crops<br />

Under Changing Climatic Scenarios in<br />

Northern Gujarat Zone<br />

18. Resilience in Rainfed Agriculture through<br />

Rainwater Management based on<br />

Catchment-Storage-Command Relationship<br />

in Assured Rainfall Zone <strong>of</strong> Marathwada<br />

Region<br />

19. Nutrient uptake, harvest index and<br />

economics <strong>of</strong> wheat varieties as influenced<br />

by alternate furrow irrigation<br />

20. Comparison <strong>of</strong> sustainable dryland cropping<br />

under Reduced Run<strong>of</strong>f Farming in Alfisols<br />

<strong>of</strong> Karnataka<br />

21. Conservation Furrow-A Low-Cost Climate<br />

Resilient Technology to Enhance the<br />

Productivity <strong>of</strong> Rainfed Crops and Cropping<br />

Systems in Scarce Rainfall Zone <strong>of</strong> Andhra<br />

Pradesh<br />

22. Conservation and Rainwater Storage<br />

Structure (CNB) on Drainage Line for<br />

Developing Groundwater Regimes in<br />

Vidarbha Region<br />

23. Effect <strong>of</strong> Irrigation and Nitrogen Sources on<br />

Yield and Water Use Efficiency <strong>of</strong> Lettuce<br />

(Lactuca Sativa L.) in West Bengal<br />

24. Effect <strong>of</strong> Irrigation and Mulch on Summer<br />

Babycorn (Zea mays L.) in New Alluvial<br />

Zone <strong>of</strong> West Bengal<br />

25. Enhancing Water Productivity in the Scarce<br />

Rainfall Zone <strong>of</strong> Andhra Pradesh through<br />

Farmponds with Seepage Control<br />

Kangjam Sonamani<br />

Singh<br />

PD Vekariya<br />

SH Narale<br />

R Rejani<br />

Ananya Mishra<br />

Jyoti<br />

Santosh Nagappa<br />

Ningoji<br />

A Malliswara Reddy<br />

RS Patode<br />

Madhurima Dey<br />

VVS Jaya Krishna<br />

Boini Narsimlu<br />

T1-11aR-1526<br />

T1-12P-1011<br />

T1-13P-1023<br />

T1-14P-1037<br />

T1-15P-1057<br />

T1-16P-1070<br />

T1-17P-1078<br />

T1-18P-1083<br />

T1-19P-1129<br />

T1-20P-1144<br />

T1-21P-1145<br />

T1-22P-1197<br />

2 | Page Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

S.No Title First Author ID<br />

26. Maximize the Production <strong>of</strong> Blackgram<br />

Through Furrow Irrigated Raised Bed<br />

Planting Methods Under Aberrated Climatic<br />

Regions<br />

27. Integrating Improved Land, Water<br />

Management Practices and Cropping<br />

Systems for Sustainable Farming in<br />

Drylands <strong>of</strong> Northern Karnataka: A Case<br />

Study<br />

28. Effect <strong>of</strong> Supplemental Irrigation on Yield<br />

and Economics <strong>of</strong> Different Pulse and<br />

Oilseed Crops under Dryland Condition in<br />

Palamau Region <strong>of</strong> Jharkhand<br />

29. Water Use Yield and Economics <strong>of</strong> Maize as<br />

Influenced by Drip Irrigation Schedules and<br />

Nitrogen Levels<br />

30. Jalkund Low Cost Rain Water Harvesting<br />

and Utilization for Rabi Season Vegetable<br />

Production in Rabitar, Namchi District,<br />

Sikkim, India<br />

31. Economic Feasibility <strong>of</strong> Farmponds: A case<br />

study <strong>of</strong> Drainage Line Treatment Scheme in<br />

Wayanad District, Kerala<br />

32. Optimum Sowing window and water stress<br />

at critical stages on the growth and yield <strong>of</strong><br />

groundnut crop- A modeling approach<br />

33. Effect <strong>of</strong> Super Absorbent Polymers<br />

(Hydrogel), Bioagent (Trichoderma) and<br />

Organic Manures in Water Management <strong>of</strong><br />

Rainfed Wheat (Triticum aestivum) in<br />

Eastern Uttar Pradesh<br />

34. Ratooning Sorghum for Agronomic<br />

Rainwater Management<br />

35. Performance <strong>of</strong> Groundnut Under Micro<br />

Irrigation Methods, Schedules and Varied<br />

Fertilizer Doses<br />

36. Water harvesting technologies for enhancing<br />

productivity <strong>of</strong> rainfed agriculture contribute<br />

to resilience<br />

37. Performance evaluation <strong>of</strong> standard<br />

performance indicators <strong>of</strong> telugu ganga<br />

project in Andhra Pradesh<br />

38. Catchment–Storage-Command Relationship<br />

for Increasing Water Productivity in Micro-<br />

Watershed <strong>of</strong> Raichur District<br />

RK Singh<br />

MS Shirahatti<br />

Nargis Kumari<br />

Y Deepthi Kiran<br />

Indra Prashad<br />

Shivakoti<br />

S Lokesh<br />

AVM Subba Rao<br />

Sayoni Das<br />

V Maruthi<br />

K Sathish Babu<br />

KV Rao<br />

Ch Murali Krishna<br />

RH Rajkumar<br />

T1-23P-1198<br />

T1-24P-1229<br />

T1-25P-1265<br />

T1-26P-1275<br />

T1-27P-1290<br />

T1-28P-1321<br />

T1-29P-1322<br />

T1-30P-1327<br />

T1-31P-1334<br />

T1-32P-1335<br />

T1-33P-1357<br />

T1-34P-1358<br />

T1-35P-1384<br />

Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance<br />

3 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

S.No Title First Author ID<br />

39. Impact <strong>of</strong> Raising Bund Height Around Rice<br />

Field on Water Management, Growth, Yield<br />

and Economics<br />

40. Performance <strong>of</strong> Land Shaping as a Climate<br />

Smart Model for the Sundarban<br />

41. Irrigation Requirement <strong>of</strong> Different Crops <strong>of</strong><br />

Krishna Basin Under Changing Climatic<br />

Scenarios<br />

42. Impact <strong>of</strong> Borewell Recharging Structures in<br />

NICRA Village<br />

43. Recycling <strong>of</strong> harvested rainwater through<br />

farm pond to enhance productivity <strong>of</strong> rabi<br />

crops under semi-arid region<br />

44. Rain Water Harvesting Technology, Jalkund<br />

- A Boon for Far Flung Hilly Farmers Under<br />

NICRA<br />

45. In-Situ Moisture Conservation and Natural<br />

Nitrification Inhibitors for Adaptation And<br />

Mitigation Of Climate Change In Semi-Arid<br />

Rainfed Regions<br />

46. Impact <strong>of</strong> Subsoiling on Soil moisture<br />

dynamics, soil physical properties and yield<br />

under finger millet + pigeonpea and groundnut<br />

+ pigeonpea cropping systems<br />

47. Checkdams - A way for rainwater harvesting,<br />

climate resilience and sustainability <strong>of</strong> rainfed<br />

farmers in Ananthapuramu, Andhra Pradesh<br />

Deokaran<br />

PK Garain<br />

D Kalyana Srinivas<br />

G Hiregoudar<br />

JK Balyan<br />

R Lalrambeiseia<br />

G Pratibha<br />

K Devaraja<br />

B Chandana<br />

T1-36P-1400<br />

T1-37P-1416<br />

T1-38P-1424<br />

T1-39P-1430<br />

T1-40P-1432<br />

T1-41P-1449<br />

T1-42P-1462<br />

T1-43P-1494<br />

T1-44P-1517<br />

48. Improved Jhum in southern part <strong>of</strong> Mizoram H Vanlalhmuliana T1-45P-1532<br />

49. Development <strong>of</strong> digital weighing type<br />

lysimeter to monitor soil water balance<br />

parameters<br />

50. Popularization <strong>of</strong> Climate Smart Technology –<br />

Jalkund/Farm Pond for Crop Cultivation Post<br />

Monsoon Period<br />

51. Land Configuration Management for<br />

Enhancing the Crop Productivity<br />

52. Impact and Effectiveness <strong>of</strong> Rainwater<br />

Management Activities and Water Utilization<br />

for Rainfed Crops in the Semi-arid Region -A<br />

Case Study<br />

53. Effect <strong>of</strong> In-situ moisture conservation<br />

practices on productivity and economics <strong>of</strong><br />

maize based cropping system under rainfed<br />

ecosystem <strong>of</strong> South Bihar<br />

54. Evaluation <strong>of</strong> cherry tomato (Solanum<br />

lycopersicum var. cerasiformae) cultivars<br />

Ajita Gupta<br />

T Amrutha<br />

Sreedhar Chauhan<br />

S Vijayakumar<br />

MK Singh<br />

Harendra Kumar<br />

T1-46P-1533<br />

T1-47P-1574<br />

T1-48P-1582<br />

T1-49P-1281<br />

T1-50P-1617<br />

T1-51P-1383<br />

4 | Page Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

S.No Title First Author ID<br />

under hydroponics for growth, yield, and<br />

quality parameters<br />

55. Impact Assessment <strong>of</strong> Farm Pond on Demand<br />

Scheme <strong>of</strong> Maharashtra<br />

56. Impact <strong>of</strong> Soil and Water Conservation<br />

Interventions on The Livelihood <strong>of</strong> Tribal<br />

Farmers from The Hilly Area <strong>of</strong> Palghar<br />

District<br />

57. Application Technologies for Harvested<br />

Rainwater in Ponds: Issues and Prospects<br />

S Gireesh<br />

Pavan Jadhav<br />

Manoranjan Kumar<br />

T1-52P-1307<br />

T1-53P-1503<br />

T1-54P-1755<br />

Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance<br />

5 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

T1-01O-1003<br />

Low-Cost Tube-well Recharge Technology for Enhancing Water<br />

Availability<br />

Navab Singh, P. P. Rohilla, S. K. Singh, and Dilip Matwa<br />

ICAR-Agricultural Technology Application Research Institute, Zone-II<br />

CAZRI Campus, Jodhpur-342 005. Rajasthan. INDIA.<br />

In India, climate vulnerabilities addressed are drought, flood, cyclone, heat waves, cold waves,<br />

etc. which are likely to threaten the food security and livelihood <strong>of</strong> millions <strong>of</strong> people in urban,<br />

peri-urban, and rural areas as well. Groundwater is clearly the preferred source for farmers.<br />

This is one <strong>of</strong> the reasons why India has experienced explosive growth in groundwater demand<br />

during recent decades (Pendke et al. 2017). The NICRA villages have become hubs <strong>of</strong> learning<br />

on climate-resilient agriculture in a short span, opening up opportunities for horizontal and<br />

vertical diffusion <strong>of</strong> successful interventions in other parts <strong>of</strong> the districts. Due to changes in<br />

climatic conditions and rainfall, the climate changed in Rajasthan, since the last ten years<br />

rainfall pattern has changed, the dry spell is more, and also an uneven distribution <strong>of</strong> rains. It<br />

is therefore important to enhance the residence <strong>of</strong> the Indian agriculture production system to<br />

climate variability and change. In this regard, Krishi Vigyan Kendra Bharatpur under NICRA<br />

Project developed low-cost tube-well recharge technology to improve the groundwater quality<br />

and availability as well.<br />

Methodology<br />

Water stress is being felt in different parts <strong>of</strong> the country owing to the increasing demand<br />

resulting from the population explosion (CGWB 2007). Most <strong>of</strong> the farmers were unaware <strong>of</strong><br />

in-situ soil and water conservation techniques. A few farmers were recharging their tube wells<br />

by using indigenous methods, viz., by the opening valve <strong>of</strong> the Kachcha tube well in the rainy<br />

season to restore run-<strong>of</strong>f water. But due to filtration problems silt is deposited in the pit and<br />

needs frequent cleaning, which is a tiresome process and huge water losses. Based on the above<br />

findings and the usefulness <strong>of</strong> recharging tube-well; KVK Bharatpur has developed indigenous<br />

wisdom <strong>of</strong> farmers with scientific input to design a low-cost recharging structure <strong>of</strong> tube-well<br />

(`10000/-only) using locally available cement pipes (perforated), brick wall in tube-well and<br />

prepared a pit also for water filtration separately outside the tube-well.<br />

Results<br />

More than 125 tube-well recharging structures have been completed successfully in Sitara<br />

village <strong>of</strong> Bharatpur district and farmers <strong>of</strong> Sahenti and Mukundpura nearby villages have also<br />

adopted this low-cost technology. Major crops in the rabi season minimized 90% <strong>of</strong> the yield<br />

losses due to recharged groundwater (8-10ft); due to which farmers cultivated wheat, barley,<br />

6 | Page Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

and vegetables other than mustard. Collected run-<strong>of</strong>f water helped farmers to pre-irrigate fields<br />

for sowing <strong>of</strong> rabi crops when September rains were not received. This intervention<br />

significantly increased in shallow acquirer level (2.5 to 4.0 m) and collected approximately<br />

4000 cubic meters <strong>of</strong> rainwater which was continuously delivered in tube wells. Similar results<br />

have been reported by earlier workers (Palanisami et al. 2006, Kambale et al. 2009, and<br />

Honnannavar et al. 2016).<br />

Details <strong>of</strong> parameters <strong>of</strong> Wheat demonstrations at farmers’ fields under NICRA Project<br />

Year Variety No. <strong>of</strong><br />

farmers<br />

Area (ha)<br />

Local check<br />

Average yield q/ha<br />

Demonstrations % increase<br />

2017-18 Raj. 4238 148 150.54 36.90 52.15 41.33<br />

2018-19 Raj. 4238 112 80.50 39.50 55.57 40.68<br />

2019-20 Raj. 4238 118 47.20 37.80 54.00 42.85<br />

2020-21 Raj. 4238 120 48.00 37.50 53.83 43.55<br />

Total -- 498 326.24 151.68 215.52 168.0<br />

Average -- -- -- 37.92 53.88 42.00<br />

Details <strong>of</strong> parameters <strong>of</strong> Barley demonstrations at farmers’ field under NICRA Project<br />

Year Variety No. <strong>of</strong><br />

farmers<br />

Area (ha)<br />

Local check<br />

Average yield q/ha<br />

Demonstrations % increase<br />

2017-18 RD-2794 52 31.16 23.25 31.40 35.05<br />

2018-19 RD-2794 15 8.00 21.30 29.08 36.50<br />

2019-20 RD-2794 15 6.00 22.80 30.98 35.80<br />

2020-21 RD-2794 20 8.00 23.50 31.35 33.40<br />

Total -- 102 53.16 9.84 122.80 140.80<br />

Average -- -- -- 22.71 30.70 35.20<br />

Details <strong>of</strong> parameters <strong>of</strong> Mustard demonstrations at farmers’ field under NICRA Project<br />

Year Variety No. <strong>of</strong><br />

farmers<br />

Area<br />

(ha)<br />

Local check<br />

Average yield q/ha<br />

Demonstrations % increase<br />

2017-18 DRMRIJ-31 134 54.22 19.25 28.00 45.45<br />

2018-19 DRMRIJ-31 188 75.20 20.30 29.50 45.30<br />

2019-20 DRMRIJ-31 118 47.20 19.20 27.80 44.80<br />

2020-21 DRMRIJ-31 120 48.00 21.40 31.35 46.50<br />

Total -- 560 224.62 80.16 116.60 182.00<br />

Average -- -- -- 20.04 29.15 45.50<br />

This low-cost tube-well recharge technology proved highly useful in decreasing irrigation<br />

costs, and soil salinity due to improvement in groundwater quality. This successful intervention<br />

has increased irrigated area as well as percent increase yield <strong>of</strong> 42.00, 35.20, and 45.50,<br />

Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance<br />

7 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

respectively in wheat, barley, and mustard This intervention has created awareness among the<br />

farming community and helped them immensely in solving the water deficit problem and<br />

encouraged them for water conservation practices. Recently, Veeranna and Jeet (2020) have<br />

studied similar groundwater recharge technology for water resource management following the<br />

standard guidelines <strong>of</strong> CGWB.<br />

Conclusion<br />

The low-cost tube-well recharge technology has been found very economic and useful in<br />

decreasing irrigation costs due to which most <strong>of</strong> the farmers have adopted it in several villages<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Bharatpur district <strong>of</strong> Rajasthan. Soil salinity has also been decreased due to improvement<br />

in groundwater quality which has been successfully used for growing vegetable crops in<br />

addition to wheat, barley, and mustard crops in the study area. Hence, such type <strong>of</strong> innovation<br />

should be up-scaled and replicated under prevailing farming situations to improve groundwater<br />

quality and to decrease soil salinity as well.<br />

References<br />

CGWB. 2007. Guide on artificial recharge to Groundwater: 1-54<br />

(http://www.cgwb.gov.in/documents/Manual-Artificial-Recharge.pdf).<br />

Honnannavar, S., Kambar, J., Patil, S. and Savant, C. 2016. Borewell recharging through<br />

rainwater harvesting by V-wire technology. J. Chem. Pharm. Res. 8(3):47-50.<br />

Kambale, J.B., Sarangi, A., Singh, D.K. and Singh, A.K. 2009. Performance Evaluation <strong>of</strong><br />

filtration unit <strong>of</strong> groundwater shaft: groundwater study. Curr. Sci. 96(4): 471-474.<br />

https://www.jstor.org/stable/24105453.<br />

Palanisami, K., Raviraj, A., and Thirumurthi, S. 2006. Artificial Recharge in Hard Rock Areas<br />

<strong>of</strong> Coimbatore District –A Case Study. International Conference on Groundwater<br />

sustainable Development problems, perspectives, and challenges (IGC-2006).<br />

http://jnuenvis.nic.in/publication/IGC%202006%20Abstracts.pdf.<br />

Pendke, M.S., Asewar, B.V., Gore, A.K., Wasker, D.P. and Samindre, M.S. 2017. Open and<br />

bore well technology. AICRP for Dryland agriculture. ISBNo: 978-93-85456-19-0.<br />

Veeranna, J. and Jeet, P. 2020. Groundwater Recharges Technology for Water Resource<br />

Management: A Case Study. 10.5772/intechopen.93946.<br />

8 | Page Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

T1-02O-1125<br />

Modified Agronomic Practices for Enhancing Efficiency <strong>of</strong> Hydrogels in<br />

Groundnut under Semi-arid Ecologies <strong>of</strong> Andhra Pradesh<br />

G.A. Rajanna, B. C. Ajay, K. K. Reddy and C. S. Praharaj<br />

ICAR-Directorate <strong>of</strong> Groundnut Research, Regional Station, Ananthapur, Andhra Pradesh 515701<br />

One <strong>of</strong> the main oilseed crops, groundnut accounts for around 26% <strong>of</strong> India's total oilseed<br />

production. About 7.6 lakh hectares <strong>of</strong> groundnut are grown in Andhra Pradesh, with an annual<br />

production <strong>of</strong> 4.8 lakh tonnes. It is a significant oilseed crop in the Rayalaseema districts <strong>of</strong><br />

Andhra Pradesh (Ananthapur, Karnool, Cuddapah, Chittoor, and Sathya Sai Jilla). Because <strong>of</strong><br />

the high erratic nature <strong>of</strong> the rainfall in these locations, farmers were unable to make use <strong>of</strong> the<br />

extra moisture. However, during the flowering and pod-filling periods, the groundnut crop is<br />

severely stressed by dryness. Due to lack <strong>of</strong> appropriate water absorption materials, the<br />

inconsistent rainfall that the crop got during that time was effectively wasted. Polymer<br />

hydrogels are one such material that can absorb the excess rainwater and release as and when<br />

the crop needs (Rajanna et al., 2022). However, the typical way <strong>of</strong> applying hydrogel is soil<br />

application, led to erroneous germination and reduced crop yields in the long run. To maximise<br />

the advantages <strong>of</strong> polymer hydrogels, we must thus change the way they are applied. According<br />

to Rajanna et al. (2021), seed treatment with pusa hydrogel and SPG 1118 led to higher<br />

biological and seed yields in the soybean-wheat system than soil application. In light <strong>of</strong> this, a<br />

field study was carried out to investigate the impact <strong>of</strong> altered agronomic procedures for<br />

improving various hydrogels efficiency in terms <strong>of</strong> growth and yield qualities in semi-arid<br />

conditions <strong>of</strong> Andhra Pradesh.<br />

Methodology<br />

A field study was conducted at ICAR-Directorate <strong>of</strong> Groundnut Research, Regional Station,<br />

Ananthapur during kharif season <strong>of</strong> 2021-22 to study the effect <strong>of</strong> modified agronomic<br />

practices for enhancing efficiency <strong>of</strong> hydrogels in groundnut under semi-arid ecologies <strong>of</strong><br />

Andhra Pradesh. The experiment consisted <strong>of</strong> ten treatments having two types <strong>of</strong> hydrogels<br />

(SPG 1118 and Aaridhar) applied with three types <strong>of</strong> method <strong>of</strong> application (soil application,<br />

slurry application and seed treatment) along with FYM, no gypsum application and control<br />

plots using RBD with three replications. Sowing was done on 06 th July 2021 using Kadari<br />

Lepakshi (K1812) variety <strong>of</strong> groundnut planted at a planting interval <strong>of</strong> 30×10 cm in a gross<br />

plot area <strong>of</strong> 27 m 2 . The recommended rate <strong>of</strong> fertilizer used was 20:40:50 kg NPK/ha along<br />

with gypsum application (500 kg/ha) at 25 days after sowing. The source <strong>of</strong> fertilizers were<br />

DAP, Urea and MOP. At various growing phases, all growth and yield observations were<br />

recorded, and the data was statistically analyzed.<br />

Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance<br />

9 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Results<br />

Results <strong>of</strong> the study indicated that, seed treatment with SPG-1118 hydrogel application<br />

exhibited significantly higher pod yield (1674.1 kg/ha), haulm yield (3919.5 kg/ha), kernel<br />

yield (1153.2 kg/ha) and shelling percentage (69.0%) as compared to control plots and other<br />

aaridhar hydrogel applied plots. However, harvest index was found to be non-significant. Soil<br />

application <strong>of</strong> commercially available Aaridhar hydrogel recorded significantly lower growth<br />

and yield attributes. Similarly, hydrogels with no gypsum applied plots also recorded<br />

significantly lower yields than others. Concurrently, higher soil moisture content was observed<br />

under application <strong>of</strong> FYM+ SPG1118 hydrogel applied plots over other plots.<br />

Yield (kg/ha)<br />

4500 Pod yield (kg/ha) Haulm yield (kg/ha)<br />

4000<br />

Kernel yield (kg/ha) Shelling %<br />

3500<br />

3000<br />

2500<br />

2000<br />

1500<br />

1000<br />

500<br />

0<br />

80<br />

70<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

Harvest index (%) & shelling %<br />

Effect <strong>of</strong> seed treatment, slurry and soil application on yield attributes and yields <strong>of</strong> groundnut<br />

Conclusion<br />

Seed treated hydrogel plots having significantly higher germination rates over soil applied<br />

hydrogel plots. Therefore, under variable rainfall conditions, modifying method <strong>of</strong> application<br />

<strong>of</strong> hydrogels in terms <strong>of</strong> seed treatment having higher yield advantage over normal practice <strong>of</strong><br />

soil application.<br />

References<br />

Rajanna, G.A., Manna, S., Singh, A., Babu, S., Singh, V.K., Dass, A., Chakraborty, D.,<br />

Patanjali, N., Chopra, I., Banerjee, T., Kumar, A., Khandelwal, A. and Parmar, B.S. 2022.<br />

Biopolymeric superabsorbent hydrogels enhance crop and water productivity <strong>of</strong><br />

soybean–wheat system in Indo-Gangetic plains <strong>of</strong> India. Scientific Reports, 12:11955.<br />

https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-16049-x<br />

10 | Page Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Rajanna, G.A., Pathanjali, N., Singh, A., Manna, S., Dass, A. and Singh, V.K. 2021. Seed<br />

treatment and slurry application <strong>of</strong> hydrogels enhances wheat yields under soybeanwheat<br />

system. (In) <strong>Extended</strong> Summaries: 5 th International Agronomy Congress,<br />

November 23-27, 2021, India, pp 1042-1043.<br />

Farm Ponds in Semi-Arid Region <strong>of</strong> Maharashtra<br />

Sarita Chemburkar, Taufique Warsi, Ankita Yadav<br />

WOTR’s Centre <strong>of</strong> Resilience Studies (W-CReS), Pune<br />

T1-03O-1133<br />

Groundwater is an important natural resource used across the globe for various purposes, including<br />

household activities, agriculture, industries, and urbanization. Agriculture productivity has always<br />

been largely influenced by water, which directly affects farmer's income and livelihood. Farmers<br />

also face challenges with water scarcity around the world, such as reduced crop production due to<br />

a lack <strong>of</strong> water, and decreased income due to unpredictable rainfall. Due to climate changes, rainfall<br />

distribution is uncertain, which results in lower income due to erratic amounts <strong>of</strong> rain, and farmers<br />

can only grow crops during the rainy season. Farm ponds are becoming an increasingly popular as<br />

a water storage tanks or reservoirs, designed for rainwater harvesting on agricultural land for<br />

irrigation purposes, cattle feed, and fish farming. The Maharashtra State Government, as well as<br />

Central Government, has been promoting Farm Pond through various schemes with the provision<br />

<strong>of</strong> subsidy. Farm ponds are traditional water harvesting structures to capture surface run<strong>of</strong>f and to<br />

utilize this stored rainwater during lean periods for agriculture. Benefits <strong>of</strong> the farm ponds include<br />

improvement in land productivity, supplemental irrigation to crops, reduced water logging in high<br />

rainfall events, and fish culture when sufficient water is available. Observations indicate that<br />

multiple sources <strong>of</strong> water are used to fill the farm ponds, with bore wells and dug wells accounting<br />

for the majority <strong>of</strong> the supply. Thus, for filling the farm ponds, farmers exploit groundwater which<br />

eventually affects the water level <strong>of</strong> the neighboring farmers (non-Farm pond owners). The problem<br />

<strong>of</strong> using farm ponds as a storage tank has imposed a negative impact on surrounding farmers that<br />

leads to inequality among the different sizes <strong>of</strong> landholding <strong>of</strong> farmers. The marginal and small<br />

farmers are suffering the most because they have less capability to invest a large amount <strong>of</strong> money<br />

for individual facilities. The negative externalities mostly impact poor farmers and fail ineffective<br />

agriculture activities. It is important to relook and regularize the policy for proper use and to ensure<br />

groundwater sustainability as epitomized in the current study.<br />

Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance<br />

11 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

T1-04O-1181<br />

Climate Resilience Through Inclusive Water Management Over A Decade:<br />

A Successful Case Study <strong>of</strong> Yelerampura Gram Panchayat, Tumakuru<br />

District, Karnataka<br />

P.R. Ramesh 1 , N. Loganandhan 1 , J. M. Prashanth 1 , Praveen Kumara 1 and D.V.S.<br />

Reddy 2<br />

1 ICAR-Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Hirehalli, Tumakuru-572 168, Karnataka, India<br />

2 ICAR-Agricultural Technology Application Research Institute, Zone-XI, H.A. Farm Post,<br />

Bengaluru-560024, Karnataka, India<br />

Water is one <strong>of</strong> the primary life sources for all the species living on the earth, including the<br />

mankind. It is also one <strong>of</strong> the major constituents for production <strong>of</strong> food, another source <strong>of</strong> life,<br />

on which human beings are dependent. The dry spells affect the productivity <strong>of</strong> crops, due to<br />

non-availability <strong>of</strong> water during the critical stages <strong>of</strong> growth, intensive rainfalls spoil by<br />

instigating flower droppings, deterioration <strong>of</strong> grains in standing crops, crop lodging etc., apart<br />

from another major impairment called soil erosion. As per a study conducted by Santanu<br />

Kumar Bal et.al., (2022) on principal rainfed crops in major dryland regions <strong>of</strong> India, the yield<br />

loss due to impact <strong>of</strong> dry spells was about 75–99% in 24% <strong>of</strong> sorghum, 23% <strong>of</strong> groundnut and<br />

13% <strong>of</strong> pearl millet and it was about 50–74% in 44% <strong>of</strong> cotton, 24% <strong>of</strong> groundnut, 17% <strong>of</strong><br />

maize, 16% each <strong>of</strong> pearl millet & sorghum and 12% <strong>of</strong> pigeon pea growing regions. As per<br />

another study conducted by Yan li et.al., (2019) in the United States, excessive rainfall can<br />

reduce maize yield up to −34% (−17 ± 3% on average), relative to the expected yield from the<br />

long-term trend, comparable to the up to −37% loss by extreme drought (−32 ± 2% on average)<br />

from 1981 to 2016. So, if any one thinks <strong>of</strong> a single solution that would solve this twin-issues,<br />

he cannot forego the key climate resilient interventions like farm ponds, percolation ponds and<br />

simple in-situ moisture conservation practices like trench cum bunding, formation ridges and<br />

furrows, etc. In order to mitigate the above described climate vulnerability, a national level<br />

project was initiated by Indian Council <strong>of</strong> Agricultural Research (ICAR), by the name -<br />

National Innovations in Climate Resilient Agriculture’ (NICRA) in the year, 2010. Planning,<br />

coordination and monitoring <strong>of</strong> the programme at national level is the responsibility <strong>of</strong> ICAR-<br />

Central Research Institute for Dryland Horticulture CRIDA, Hyderabad. At district level, the<br />

selected KVK is responsible for implementing the project at village level through farmer’s<br />

participatory approach. Under this programme, the interventions were focused only to address<br />

climate related constraints for stabilizing the productivity and not general agriculture<br />

development.<br />

12 | Page Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Methodology<br />

Tumakuru is a district with a high occurrence <strong>of</strong> drought with a poor coping mechanism. As<br />

part <strong>of</strong> NICRA, several technologies were introduced at Durgada Nagenahalli village <strong>of</strong><br />

Yelerampura gram panchayat in Tumakuru district, for minimizing the impact <strong>of</strong> dry spells<br />

and drought by leveraging the scientific techniques and application <strong>of</strong> science for enhancing<br />

the productivity <strong>of</strong> dryland farming systems and sustaining livelihoods. Later, Tanganahalli<br />

and Chikkadoddawadi villages <strong>of</strong> same gram panchayat were added.<br />

The average annual rainfall <strong>of</strong> the district is about 697 mm. About 70% <strong>of</strong> the cultivation is<br />

under dry lands, as the irrigated area is only 30%. The resilient technologies were prioritized<br />

in consultation with the farmers. Similarly, the appropriate locations for water harvesting<br />

systems such as check dam, farm ponds, percolation tanks, etc. were identified and<br />

demonstrated. Identification <strong>of</strong> appropriate coping practices and technologies relevant to<br />

address specific climatic vulnerabilities was accomplished through interactions with farmers in<br />

selected villages by KVKs based on participatory rural appraisal (PRA) and focused group<br />

discussions (FGDs). The National Agricultural Research System (NARS) comprising <strong>of</strong> ICAR<br />

and State Agricultural Universities (SAUs) served as the source <strong>of</strong> proven technologies along<br />

with the indigenous technical knowledge (ITK) <strong>of</strong> participating farmers.<br />

Results<br />

The natural resource management (NRM) component <strong>of</strong> the project focused on soil and water<br />

management practise. The soil conservation part <strong>of</strong> the NRM component is very important,<br />

considering the soil erosion status <strong>of</strong> the villages, before initiation <strong>of</strong> the project. The<br />

technologies <strong>of</strong> soil management short listed for adoption are Trench cum bunding, Ploughing<br />

across the slope and formation <strong>of</strong> ridges and furrows. Important resilient practices<br />

demonstrated in the villages D.Nagenahalli and Tanganahalli for soil management are as given<br />

below:<br />

Trench cum bunding: The trench cum bunding technology was adopted in low to medium<br />

slope regions where arable cropping is practiced in the NICRA project. This method served<br />

dual purpose: firstly the bunds built across the slope with appropriate sections arrested soil<br />

erosion and secondly the trenches served as water reservation pits that keep soil moisture intact<br />

for longer duration. About 130 ha area was brought under trench cum bunding involving about<br />

180 farmers. As per the research estimates, in one hectare <strong>of</strong> land around 50,000 litres <strong>of</strong> water<br />

could be harvested in one filling by the trenches dugout. So, this accounts to be about 6.5<br />

million litres <strong>of</strong> water, getting stored in situ in the farmers’ fields during rainfall events.<br />

Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance<br />

13 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Treatment<br />

Ground nut crop yield under trench cum bunding<br />

Seed yield<br />

(Qtl/ha)<br />

Percentage<br />

increase in<br />

yield<br />

Gross<br />

returns<br />

(Rs./ha)<br />

Net returns<br />

(Rs./ha)<br />

Trench cum bunding 15.3<br />

59,670 33,780<br />

27.5<br />

without trench cum bunding 12.0 46,800 22,175<br />

Farmer Sri Nagarajaiah had cultivated Groundnut in his 1 ha farm. The yield <strong>of</strong> Ground nut<br />

with trench cum bunding was 15.30 qt/ha, compared to that <strong>of</strong> Ground nut without trench cum<br />

bunding (12 qt/ha). The yield <strong>of</strong> the Groundnut increased to an extent <strong>of</strong> 27.50 in average. The<br />

farmer benefitted with additional yield <strong>of</strong> 3.30 quintal and an additional income <strong>of</strong> Rs. 11,605/-<br />

Ploughing across slope and formation <strong>of</strong> ridges and furrows: Ploughing across slope<br />

reduces soil surface erosion as well as any risk <strong>of</strong> nutrient mobilization on the soil surface.<br />

Soils cultivated across the slope also hold more water in surface depressions before surface<br />

flow is initiated. The low-cost interventions like ploughing across the slope and cultivation<br />

through ridges and furrows were demonstrated in 15 ha, benefitting 40 farmers and 5 ha,<br />

benefitting 25 farmers, respectively.<br />

Crop<br />

Effect <strong>of</strong> formation <strong>of</strong> ridges and furrows on crops yields and economics<br />

Crop yields<br />

(q/ha)<br />

(Average)<br />

Demo<br />

Local<br />

Economics with R&F (Rs./ha)<br />

(Average)<br />

Gross<br />

Return<br />

Net<br />

Return<br />

Economics without<br />

R&F (Rs./ha)<br />

(Average)<br />

Gross<br />

Return<br />

Net<br />

Return<br />

Red gram BRG-2 5.8 4.3 29,000 13,500 21,500 5,900<br />

Farmer Sri Manjunath had cultivated Groundnut in his 1 ha farm. The yield <strong>of</strong> Redgram with<br />

Ridges and furrows was 5.8 qt/ha, compared to that <strong>of</strong> Redgram without Ridges and furrows<br />

(4.3 qt/ha). The farmer benefitted with an additional income <strong>of</strong> Rs. 7,600/-. The technologies<br />

<strong>of</strong> water conservation and management implemented in the NICRA villages are as follows:<br />

New farm ponds, Check dams, Water storage structures, Desilting and widening <strong>of</strong> catchment<br />

channels, Fixing the leakage <strong>of</strong> community tank, Desilting and widening <strong>of</strong> defunct farm<br />

ponds, Desilting and widening <strong>of</strong> check dams. Considering the importance <strong>of</strong> harvesting water<br />

for critical irrigation for saving crop during drought in the villages, 108 farm ponds have been<br />

created. The total rainwater storage capacity <strong>of</strong> the 108 farm ponds dug during the project<br />

implementation is 30,950 Cu m and it has benefited over 119 farmers. The total water storage<br />

capacity <strong>of</strong> the newly constructed 5 check dams is 6,750 Cu m and has benefited 11 farmers.<br />

The total rainwater storage capacity <strong>of</strong> the 13 percolation ponds for underground recharge is<br />

1,750 Cu m and has benefited over 13 farmers. The total water storage capacity <strong>of</strong> the 18<br />

rejuvenated farm ponds is 8,230 Cu m benefited 23 farmers. The total water storage capacity<br />

14 | Page Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

<strong>of</strong> the 11 rejuvenated check dams is 11,210 Cu m and benefited 20 farmers. The total rainwater<br />

storage capacity <strong>of</strong> the 3 rejuvenated community tanks is 5,500 Cu m and has benefited 12<br />

farmers. The total water storage capacity <strong>of</strong> the renovation <strong>of</strong> community tanks is 3,68,040 Cu<br />

m and benefited 63 farmers. The overall water storage capacity <strong>of</strong> water harvesting structures<br />

is 4,28,890 Cu m. Seventeen out <strong>of</strong> 32 open wells and 11 out <strong>of</strong> 29 bore wells were recharged<br />

due to water harvesting structures. The water storage capacity <strong>of</strong> the various water harvesting<br />

structures is shown. Around 92.5 ha additional area was brought under protective irrigation by<br />

utilizing harvested water from these structures. Efforts were made to provide access to water<br />

for as many households as possible by way <strong>of</strong> convergence with the ongoing developmental<br />

programmes being taken up in the villages. About 221 households got access to water, thus<br />

farmers in the NICRA can now save the crops during the dry spells by way <strong>of</strong> critical irrigation<br />

and can enhance area under cropping during good rainfall years during Rabi with harvested<br />

water, thus stabilized productivity during drought years and enhanced income by way <strong>of</strong><br />

cropping intensification during normal years.<br />

Details <strong>of</strong> rainwater harvesting structures and their capacity, constructed in NICRA<br />

villages <strong>of</strong> Yelleramapura gram panchayat<br />

Water conservation<br />

structures<br />

No. <strong>of</strong><br />

Units<br />

No. <strong>of</strong><br />

farmers<br />

Water Storage Capacity<br />

(Cu m)<br />

Protective<br />

irrigation<br />

(ha)<br />

New farm ponds 108 119 30950 58<br />

Percolation ponds 13 13 1750 -<br />

New check dams 05 11 6750 1.5<br />

Water storage structures 05 05 1960 03<br />

Rejuvenation <strong>of</strong> farm<br />

ponds<br />

Rejuvenation <strong>of</strong> check<br />

dams<br />

Rejuvenation <strong>of</strong><br />

community tanks<br />

18 23 8230 06<br />

11 20 11210 7<br />

05 63 368040 17<br />

Total 428890 92.5<br />

Check dam helps in ground water recharge <strong>of</strong> the area. Around five check dams were<br />

constructed in the D. Nagenahalli village. The water storage capacity developed is 6,570 cu m<br />

in total. Around 11 farmers benefited due to this intervention. In one <strong>of</strong> the success stories<br />

considered for this study, farmer Sri Chandranna who benefitted from one check dam <strong>of</strong> size<br />

40 m x 50 m x 3 m. He used to cultivate only Finger millet and Maize earlier in two acre farm<br />

during monsoon. After the construction <strong>of</strong> check dam under the NICRA project, he took up<br />

Ragi, Maize and Brinjal in the year 2021-22, in 0.5-acre land, supported by the check dam<br />

Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance<br />

15 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

water <strong>of</strong> 6,000 cu m capacity. The yield <strong>of</strong> Brinjal was 97.8 quintal that provided an income <strong>of</strong><br />

Rs.92,690, owing to the supplemental irrigation from this check dam.<br />

Details <strong>of</strong> impact <strong>of</strong> check dam constructed in Sri Chandranna’s farm<br />

Crop Variety Area<br />

(acre)<br />

Before NICRA<br />

Yield<br />

Gross Cost<br />

(Rs.)<br />

Gross benefit<br />

(Rs.)<br />

Net benefit<br />

(Rs.)<br />

Finger Millet Local 1.0 6 q 2,100 7,500 5,400<br />

Maize Local 1.0 15q 9,200 18,000 8,800<br />

Total 11300 25500 14200<br />

After NICRA<br />

Finger Millet ML365 1.0 12 q 9,050 30,000 20,950<br />

Maize MAH-14-5 0.5 9 q 4,700 10,800 6,100<br />

Brinjal Arka Shirish 0.5 97.8 q 19,780 1,12,470 92,690<br />

Conclusion<br />

Total 33,530 1,53,270 1,19,740<br />

Conservation <strong>of</strong> rainfall water and its judicious use <strong>of</strong> it is the primary activity in combating<br />

the climate variability in vulnerable village. Even the soil conservation related interventions<br />

like trench cum bunding and cultivation <strong>of</strong> crops in ridges and furrows are also recommended<br />

in the farmers’ fields with a sole motive <strong>of</strong> in situ conservation <strong>of</strong> rain water. The interventions<br />

carried out in Yelerampura gram panchayat under NICRA project were well received not only<br />

by the farmers <strong>of</strong> that panchayat but also other government <strong>of</strong>ficers and law makers. Various<br />

promotional efforts taken by the KVK team in the last one decade resulted in adoption <strong>of</strong><br />

similar measures in other parts <strong>of</strong> the district. Recognizing the interventions by the KVK, in<br />

the area <strong>of</strong> water conservation for achieving climate resilience in agriculture, National Water<br />

Award-2020 was bestowed on the Yelerampura gram panchayat by the Ministry <strong>of</strong> Jal Shakti<br />

in March 2021.<br />

References<br />

Santanu Kumar Bal, VM Sandeep, P Vijay Kumar, AVM. Subba Rao, VP Pramod, N<br />

Manikandan, Ch. Srinivasa Rao, Naveen P Singh, S Bhaskar. 2022. Assessing impact<br />

<strong>of</strong> dry spells on the principal rainfed crops in major dryland regions <strong>of</strong> India.<br />

Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, Volume 313.<br />

Yan li, Kaiyu Guan, Gary D. Schnitkey, Evan DeLucia and Big Peng. 2019. Excessive rainfall<br />

leads to maize yield loss <strong>of</strong> a comparable magnitude to extreme drought in the United<br />

States. Global Change Biology, 25(7): 2325-2337.<br />

16 | Page Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

T1-05O-1189<br />

Resilience Through Water Conservation and Adoption <strong>of</strong> Drought<br />

Tolerant Crop Variety in NICRA Village Gunia, Gumla, Jharkhand<br />

Sanjay Kumar 1 , Atal Bihari Tiwari 1 , Anjani Kumar Singh 2 , Amrendra<br />

Kumar 2 and 1 Subhayan Das<br />

1 Krishi Vigyan Kendra Gumla, Jharkhand 83523, India<br />

2 Director ICAR-ATARI Patna, Zone-IV, Patna-801 506, Bihar<br />

Climate change and global warming impacts all sectors <strong>of</strong> human life and agriculture is<br />

particularly vulnerable to it. Increase in atmospheric and surface temperatures leads directly to<br />

increase in evaporation rates <strong>of</strong> water at the earth’s surface. These factors leads to more<br />

vigorous hydrology cycle, influencing precipitation amounts, Intensities, frequencies and<br />

extreme. Keeping the major vulnerability viz. water stress and crop failure, in the centre KVK<br />

Gumla implemented the NICRA project in severely affected (Low rainfall) village <strong>of</strong> Gunia <strong>of</strong><br />

Ghaghra block since 2010-11. Under the project focus was given on water management and<br />

crop production. And accordingly, strategic plan viz. community involvement especially for<br />

water conservation and effective utilization, involvement <strong>of</strong> policy makers, departmental<br />

convergence and promotion <strong>of</strong> drought tolerant resilient crop varieties were taken as a major<br />

tools in mitigation <strong>of</strong> water stress/ scarcity and enhancement in adoption <strong>of</strong> resilient crop<br />

varieties. As a result farmers <strong>of</strong> the adopted village succeeded in storage <strong>of</strong> good volume <strong>of</strong><br />

water in created/ developed structure and harvested good crop yield. Through water<br />

management and adoption <strong>of</strong> resilient crop varieties, resiliency developed against the<br />

vulnerability. And in the village, resilient measures taken under NICRA project have left the<br />

significant impact in the district.<br />

Methodology<br />

The goal <strong>of</strong> technology demonstration component under NICRA is to maintain some <strong>of</strong> the<br />

successful practices and technologies that promote resilience to climate risks. And accordingly<br />

the strategic plan was formulated for successful implementation <strong>of</strong> the intervention with an<br />

objective to conserve and harvest the rain and flowing water to ensure crop production and<br />

cope with water stress vulnerabilities. Although NICRA adopted area receive about 1100 mm<br />

rainfall annually. There was a high degree variation in the spatial and temporal distribution<br />

rendering the farming community vulnerable. There was no proper water storage/ harvesting<br />

structure that can support agriculture during dry spell and beyond kharif season. After assessing<br />

the problem and for its solution major action was undertaken viz. renovation/ excavation <strong>of</strong><br />

pond, well, canal and development <strong>of</strong> Sand bag check dam (Bora-Bandh) for whom community<br />

involvement was ensured. And impression <strong>of</strong> intervention on the mindset <strong>of</strong> villagers and other<br />

Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance<br />

17 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

villagers was so strong that they also started mobilizing themselves to adopt it for crop<br />

production and diversification against the vulnerabilities.<br />

Results<br />

Resilient intervention viz. Water conservation/ Harvesting, Renovation, Parapet construction,<br />

Canal cleaning and sand bag check dam resulted in providing lifesaving irrigation during water<br />

stress condition, increased area under double or multiple crop, enhanced cropping intensity,<br />

increased crop productivity, increased ground water level, increase water storage capacity and<br />

water level rise by 7 to 10 feet.<br />

Climate resilient crop varieties were found as one <strong>of</strong> the most important technological factor<br />

for ensuring the better crop harvest and income. Results <strong>of</strong> the findings clearly show that<br />

improved and tolerant crop varieties along with the proper crop management practices can<br />

enhance the coping ability through risk reduction in vulnerable environment. Ensuring the<br />

availability <strong>of</strong> the resilient varieties in various crops at the appropriate time to the farmers is an<br />

important challenge to address climate vulnerabilities. Under the NICRA project focus was<br />

given to identify the suitable resilient major crop varieties for up scaling in the district.<br />

Details <strong>of</strong> water harvesting structures<br />

Unit<br />

No.<br />

Structure<br />

Name<br />

Dimension (in meter)<br />

Storage<br />

Capacity<br />

(m 3 )<br />

Net utilized<br />

water (m 3 )<br />

Area Covered<br />

(ha)<br />

Before After Before After Before After Before After<br />

Storage<br />

capacity<br />

increase<br />

d (%)<br />

2<br />

Community<br />

Pond<br />

35x40x2.5 36.5x41x3 6420 8025 3210 4815 32 48 50.00<br />

2 Pond - 30.5x36.5x3 - 5200 - 3104 - 31 100.00<br />

1 Pond 28.6x28.9x2.1 30.5x30.5x3 1440 2831 792 1700 08 17 112.50<br />

1 Pond 38.7x35x2.1 39.5x36.5x2.5 2323 3207 1287 1934 12 19 58.33<br />

1 Pond<br />

82.2x71.6x2.1<br />

91.5x76.2x2.5<br />

1200<br />

0<br />

1625<br />

0<br />

4920 7313 49 73 48.98<br />

25 Dova - 7.6x6x3 -- 2500 -- 2000 -- 20 100.00<br />

03 Pond - 15.2x15.2x3 -- 1200 -- 1000 -- 9 100.00<br />

Total<br />

- 35<br />

-<br />

2228<br />

1<br />

3891<br />

3<br />

1020<br />

9<br />

2816<br />

6<br />

101 217<br />

18 | Page Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

1E+10<br />

9E+09<br />

8E+09<br />

7E+09<br />

6E+09<br />

5E+09<br />

4E+09<br />

3E+09<br />

2E+09<br />

1E+09<br />

0<br />

Sarita<br />

Storage<br />

capacity (m 3 )<br />

sarita.che<br />

mburkar@<br />

wotr.org.in<br />

Impact <strong>of</strong> water storage structure<br />

91<br />

Net UtilizedWater<br />

(m 3 )<br />

Others<br />

Indian<br />

Impact <strong>of</strong> water storage structure<br />

NGO<br />

Area Covered<br />

(in ha)<br />

Area in ha<br />

Extent <strong>of</strong> Adoption in NICRA Village<br />

500<br />

400<br />

300<br />

200<br />

100<br />

0<br />

2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21<br />

Rice var.- Lalat<br />

Rice var.- Anjali<br />

Rice var.- Sahbhagi Dhan<br />

Ragi var.- GPU-28<br />

120<br />

100<br />

Area in ha<br />

80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

0<br />

Extent <strong>of</strong> Adoption in NICRA Village<br />

2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21<br />

Blackgram var.- PU-30<br />

Niger var.- Birsa Niger-3<br />

Wheat var.- K-9107<br />

Mustard var.- PM-30<br />

50<br />

Productivity trend<br />

50<br />

Productivity trend<br />

Productivity in q<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21<br />

Lalat Anjali Sahbhagi Dhan<br />

Productivity in q<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21<br />

PU-30 Birsa Niger-3 K-9107 PM-30<br />

Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance<br />

19 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Conclusion<br />

Location specific conservation technologies, water conservation and their efficient<br />

management and adoption strategies as well as enabling policies on crop insurance along with<br />

robust early warning system, weather-based advisories will further facilitates enhancing the<br />

resilience <strong>of</strong> Indian agriculture to climate change and climate variability. The need for stress<br />

short duration and drought tolerant varieties has become paramount in the present context <strong>of</strong><br />

climate change, apart from various adaptation and mitigation strategies to feed the everincreasing<br />

population. These stress tolerant cultivators can play an important role in coping<br />

with climate variability as well as enhancing the productivity and farmers income.<br />

T1-05aO-1375<br />

Transforming Agriculture through Hydroponics: An Innovative Water<br />

Efficient Technology for Rainfed Areas<br />

Ankur Agarwal* and Devkanta P. Singh<br />

Defence Institute <strong>of</strong> Bio-Energy Research (DIBER), DRDO, Haldwani,<br />

Distt Nainital, P.O. Arjunpur, Uttarakhand- 263139, India<br />

*ankurdr@rediffmail.com<br />

The challenge to agriculture in the coming decades is to provide safe food to the ever-growing<br />

population without destroying natural resources. Himalayan states <strong>of</strong> India have a key role in<br />

biodiversity conservation, but these states are also going through the problem <strong>of</strong> decreasing<br />

share <strong>of</strong> agricultural livelihood and a rapidly increasing problem <strong>of</strong> migration from border<br />

villages. Among the various factors reported for migration, few important are depleting<br />

productivity from agriculture due to changing climatic conditions, problem <strong>of</strong> wild animals and<br />

search for better livelihood opportunities. Hence, measures are required to increase the<br />

livelihood opportunities in these border areas to curb the problem <strong>of</strong> migration through<br />

intervention <strong>of</strong> modern technologies. Among these technologies, soil-less cultivation<br />

(hydroponics) have shown potential for sustainable agriculture in varying environments. Most<br />

<strong>of</strong> the time due to topographical challenges, it is not possible to codon the farm area with<br />

fencing and thus make it vulnerable to attack by stray and grazing animals vis-à-vis wild<br />

animals. Secondly, possibility <strong>of</strong> vertical farming allows farming in a compact area with<br />

substantial water saving due to reuse and recycling and hence dependency on rain can be<br />

minimized for farming. Another important feature this technology has <strong>of</strong>fered is production <strong>of</strong><br />

safe fresh food without residual toxicity. Defence Institute <strong>of</strong> Bio-Energy Research (DIBER),<br />

DRDO has successfully standardized and customized technology <strong>of</strong> cultivation <strong>of</strong> multiple<br />

vegetable crops viz., leafy vegetables (lettuce, spinach, coriander, parsley, pakchoy, oregano,<br />

lahi); fruit vegetables (tomato, cucumber, brinjal, capsicum, broccoli, strawberry, bitter gourd,<br />

sponge gourd, etc) and root vegetables (beetroot, turnip, and radish) under single nutrient<br />

20 | Page Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

solution. This customized hydroponics technology allows the cultivation <strong>of</strong> more than 10<br />

vegetables simultaneously under a single nutrient system thereby ensuring year-round<br />

vegetable cultivation with a higher yield. In comparison to conventional agriculture,<br />

hydroponics technology allows vertical utilization <strong>of</strong> space, water saving to the tune <strong>of</strong> 80%,<br />

and near-to-zero use <strong>of</strong> pesticides and weedicides, thus ensuring no residual toxicity. This<br />

technology also makes it possible to use collected rain water as the requirement for water is<br />

low. The entire system is low cost, low maintenance and environment friendly. The institute<br />

has also developed a suitable nutrient composition suitable for wide range <strong>of</strong> vegetables. The<br />

article deals with the hydroponics technology in detail vis-à-vis efforts made at DIBER for<br />

standardization <strong>of</strong> hydroponics technology.<br />

T1-05bO-1161<br />

Enhancing Water Productivity in Rainfed Agriculture through in-situ and ex-situ Rain<br />

Water Harvesting- NICRA Experiences<br />

B.V. Asewar and M.S.Pendke<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Agronomy, Vasantrao Naik Marathwada Krishi Vidyapeeth, Parbhani 431402<br />

In Marathwada region, out total cultivated area <strong>of</strong> 57.94 lakh ha, 49.60 lakh ha area is rainfed.<br />

The impact <strong>of</strong> climate change and variability in the country on agricultural production is quite<br />

evident in the recent years. The weather aberrations like drought and floods, extreme events<br />

like high intense rainfall, hail storms, heat wave, cold wave etc, are recurrent in most parts <strong>of</strong><br />

the country during the crop growing periods. The South-West monsoon account for nearly 75%<br />

<strong>of</strong> the precipitation received in the country and exerts a strong influence on the kharif food<br />

grain production and the economy in terms <strong>of</strong> agricultural output, farmers income and price<br />

stability. The onset <strong>of</strong> South west monsoon, the amount <strong>of</strong> rainfall and its distribution are<br />

crucial factors which influence the performance <strong>of</strong> agriculture. The probability <strong>of</strong> erratic<br />

monsoon rains is about 40% which implies that 4 out <strong>of</strong> 10 years there would be an adverse<br />

impact on the crop production. There is need to develop appropriate strategies to deal with such<br />

eventualities. Many contingency plans are available at different scales. However, any<br />

contingency intervention either technology related (land, water, soil, crop) or institutional and<br />

policy based, which are implemented on a real time basis in any crop growing season<br />

considered as “Real Time Contingency Plan” is the need <strong>of</strong> hour to stabilize crop stands,<br />

production and income in rainfed regions. Marathwada region comprising <strong>of</strong> eight districts<br />

(Aurangabad, Beed, Hingoli, Jalna, Latur, Nanded, Osmanabad and Parbhani) is traditionally<br />

a drought-prone region. The region receives annual rainfall in the range <strong>of</strong> 500 to 1100 mm<br />

and comes under assured rainfall zone (60%), moderately high rainfall zone (20%) and scarcity<br />

zone (20%). The soils in the region are deep black and medium black. Major kharif crops <strong>of</strong><br />

the region are cotton, soybean, pigeon pea, sorghum, green gram black gram, and pearl millet,<br />

whereas major rabi rainfed crops are rabi sorghum, safflower and chickpea. Rainfall is the key<br />

Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance<br />

21 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

variable influencing crop productivity in rainfed farming. Intermittent and prolonged drought<br />

are the major cause <strong>of</strong> yield reduction in most <strong>of</strong> the crops. Based on the farmers need, technical<br />

interventions were taken up under NICRA (National Innovations in Climate Resilient<br />

Agriculture) action research project through preparedness and real time contingency measures.<br />

Methodology<br />

In-situ moisture conservation through conservation furrow in sole soybean and soybean<br />

+ pigeonpea (4:2): Before introduction <strong>of</strong> this project, the farmers were cultivating sole<br />

soybean crop on flat bed without opening <strong>of</strong> conservation furrow. However yield reductions<br />

were observed due to moisture stress during dryspells . Under improved practice, opening <strong>of</strong><br />

conservation furrow after every 4 rows in sole soybean and soybean + pigeon pea (4:2)<br />

intercropping after 30 to 35 days <strong>of</strong> sowing was adopted as a strategy for moisture conservation<br />

on farmers field during 2011-2015.<br />

Soybean + pigeonpea (4:2) intercropping system: Traditionally, farmers were cultivating<br />

soybean crop as sole crop which is very sensitive to moisture stress as well as excess moisture.<br />

The drastic yield reductions were observed due to dryspells. Under such circumstances soybean<br />

+ pigeonpea (4:2) intercropping system was introduced and adopted on farmers field during<br />

2011- 2015.<br />

In-situ moisture conservation through broad bed & furrow (BBF) in soybean:<br />

Performance <strong>of</strong> BBF technique for sowing <strong>of</strong> soybean on farmers field was evaluated during<br />

2014-15 to 2016-17.<br />

Results<br />

Adoption <strong>of</strong> conservation furrow technique: The effect <strong>of</strong> in-situ moisture conservation<br />

practice like conservation furrow in sole soybean on crop productivity (yield), net monetary<br />

returns, BC ratio and RWUE was analyzed.<br />

Effect <strong>of</strong> conservation furrow on crop productivity, NMR, BC ratio and RWUE<br />

Intervention/Year 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Mean<br />

Yield<br />

(kg/ha)<br />

Conservation<br />

furrow in Soybean<br />

1850 2620 1750 668 632 1504<br />

No furrow 1424 2146 1506 446 487 1202<br />

Net<br />

returns<br />

(kg/ha)<br />

Conservation<br />

furrow in Soybean<br />

21017 30723 41250 10844 3024 22571<br />

No furrow 16177 21546 32710 7240 5374 18609<br />

B:C<br />

ratio<br />

Conservation<br />

furrow in Soybean<br />

1.52 2.53 3.06 2.02 1.61 2.14<br />

22 | Page Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

No furrow 1.16 2.07 2.63 1.34 1.42 1.72<br />

RWUE<br />

(kg/hamm)<br />

Conservation<br />

furrow in Soybean<br />

4.14 5.50 1.78 2.36 2.21 3.19<br />

No furrow 3.19 4.5 1.53 1.58 1.7 2.50<br />

Results indicated that, with conservation furrow, a sole soybean yield <strong>of</strong> 1504 kg/ha was<br />

obtained with a yield advantage <strong>of</strong> 302 kg/ha over the treatment <strong>of</strong> no conservation furrow<br />

(1202 kg/ha). The net returns <strong>of</strong> Rs. 22571/ha was obtained due to adoption <strong>of</strong> conservation<br />

furrow technique and found to be higher than the net return <strong>of</strong> Rs. 18609 in no furrow system.<br />

The BC ratio under adoption <strong>of</strong> conservation furrow technique was found to be 2.14 as against<br />

BC ratio <strong>of</strong> 1.72 with no furrow system. Similarly, the RWUE <strong>of</strong> 3.19 was found with<br />

conservation furrow as compared to RWUE <strong>of</strong> 2.50 in no furrow system. The effect <strong>of</strong> in-situ<br />

moisture conservation practice like conservation furrow in sole soybean on crop productivity<br />

(yield), net monetary returns, BC ratio and RWUE was analyzed and the data is presented.<br />

Effect <strong>of</strong> conservation furrow on crop productivity, NMR, BC ratio and RWUE<br />

Yield<br />

(kg/ha)<br />

Net<br />

returns<br />

(kg/ha)<br />

B:C<br />

ratio<br />

Intervention/Year 2011-<br />

12<br />

Conservation furrow in<br />

Soy + PP (4:2)<br />

2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 Mean<br />

2900 1496 1610 513 1731 1650<br />

No furrow 1875 1160 1205 272 1430 1188<br />

Conservation furrow in<br />

Soy + PP (4:2)<br />

38840 38848 43180 16572 19840 31456<br />

No furrow 18750 26080 27790 8786 16390 19559<br />

Conservation furrow in<br />

Soy + PP (4:2)<br />

3.15 3.16 3.39 2.24 1.62 2.71<br />

RWUE<br />

(kg/hamm)<br />

No furrow 2.04 2.44 2.54 1.18 1.33 1.90<br />

Conservation furrow in<br />

Soy + PP (4:2)<br />

6.50 3.14 1.63 1.81 6.07 3.83<br />

No furrow 4.20 2.43 1.22 0.96 5.01 2.76<br />

In soybean + pigeonpea (4:2) intercropping system, an additional soybean equivalent yield <strong>of</strong><br />

462 kg/ha was obtained with adoption <strong>of</strong> conservation furrow technique as compared to no<br />

furrow with net monetary benefit <strong>of</strong> Rs. 11897/ha. The increase in yield and net return is due<br />

to 30 per cent more moisture conservation resulted in better crop growth and crop performance<br />

even during dry spells.<br />

Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance<br />

23 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Climate Resilient Technology: intercropping system: The effect <strong>of</strong> intercropping system as<br />

compared to sole crop under climatic variations over a period <strong>of</strong> years on crop productivity<br />

(yield), net monetary returns, BC ratio and RWUE was analyzed and the data is presented.<br />

Effect <strong>of</strong> intercropping on crop productivity, NMR, BC ratio and RWUE<br />

Year 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 Mean<br />

Yield<br />

(kg/ha)<br />

Net<br />

returns<br />

(kg/ha)<br />

B:C<br />

ratio<br />

RWUE<br />

(kg/hamm)<br />

Soybean +<br />

Pigeonpea (4:2)<br />

Intercropping<br />

system<br />

2464 2859 2443 1340 1731 2167<br />

Sole Soybean 1577 2251 1790 446 527 1318<br />

Soybean +<br />

Pigeonpea (4:2)<br />

Intercropping<br />

system<br />

31715 50623 61132 20164 19840 36695<br />

Sole Soybean 26494 39857 44791 6711 6040 24778<br />

Soybean +<br />

Pigeonpea (4:2)<br />

Intercropping<br />

system<br />

1.98 1.64 3.5 1.59 1.62 2.06<br />

Sole Soybean 1.44 1.29 2.56 0.52 0.49 1.26<br />

Soybean +<br />

Pigeonpea (4:2)<br />

Intercropping<br />

system<br />

5.52 6.0 2.58 4.74 6.07 4.98<br />

Sole Soybean 3.53 4.72 1.89 1.58 1.85 2.71<br />

Soybean + Pigeonpea (4:2) intercropping system recorded significantly higher soybean<br />

equivalent mean yield <strong>of</strong> 2167 kg/ha as against the sole soybean mean yield <strong>of</strong> 1318 kg/ha i.e.<br />

farmers practice over a period <strong>of</strong> five years. The mean net returns in soybean + pigeonpea<br />

intercropping system was recorded as Rs. 36695/ha as against mean sole soybean net return <strong>of</strong><br />

Rs. 24778/ha in farmers practice. The BC ratio and RWUE was also higher in soybean:<br />

pigeonpea intercropping system as compared to sole soybean crop. During 2014 and 2015,<br />

despite <strong>of</strong> more than 50% deficit rainfall, the intercropping system sustained even in prolonged<br />

dryspell during 2015. The dryspell was occurred at flowering and pod filling stage <strong>of</strong> soybean<br />

and vegetative stage in pigeonpea.<br />

In-situ moisture conservation through broad bed & furrow (BBF) in soybean: The data<br />

on. crop yield, net return, BC ratio and RWUE under BBF technology as compared to farmers<br />

practice is presented.<br />

24 | Page Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Comparison <strong>of</strong> BBF technique with farmers practice for soybean<br />

Soil type Intervention Mean<br />

Seed<br />

yield kg/<br />

ha<br />

Light to<br />

medium<br />

black<br />

soil<br />

Stover<br />

yield<br />

/ha<br />

kg<br />

Net returns,<br />

Rs./ha<br />

BC ratio<br />

RWUE,<br />

kg/ha-mm<br />

BBF 1337 1847 19733 1.62 2.166<br />

Farmers<br />

practice<br />

1122 1433 14384 1.46 1.79<br />

Above table indicated that due to use <strong>of</strong> BBF technology, the yield increase was recorded.<br />

Similarly, the net returns, BC ratio and RWUE was found to be higher in BBF technique as<br />

compared to farmers practice. This BBF technique was proved as climate resilient technique<br />

under changing climate.<br />

Well and bore well recharging model: An Experience in NICRA Village A National<br />

Innovations on Climate Resilient Agriculture (NICRA) project in being implemented on<br />

farmers field at village Babhulgaon Tq.Dist.Parbhani. Open well and bore well recharge<br />

technology was demonstrated on 10 and 7 farmers field through participatory mode<br />

respectively. The pre-& post monsoon water levels in the wells were monitored. Also, the<br />

aquifer characteristic viz. transmissivity and specific yield were determined. Accordingly, the<br />

ground water recharge was determined. The Recharge wells recorded higher ground water<br />

potential as compared to un-recharged wells.<br />

Conclusion<br />

Preparedness like adoption <strong>of</strong> climate resilient crops and varieties, adoption <strong>of</strong> in-situ and exsitu<br />

moisture conservation techniques i.e. Broad bed furrow sowing method, conservation<br />

furrow, farm pond, recharging <strong>of</strong> well and bore wells and intercropping system plays a crucial<br />

role in dryland agriculture for sustaining crop productivity. The Broad Bed and Furrow sowing<br />

technique (BBF) was found to be most efficient climate resilient technology under variable<br />

climatic conditions over a period <strong>of</strong> 5 years with respect to yield enhancement and thereby the<br />

increased net returns. Also, BBF technique resulted in more moisture conservation as reflected<br />

by mean soil moisture status.<br />

References<br />

Ramchandraapa B.K., M.N. Thimmegowda, A. Satish, B.N. Jagadeesh, K. Devaraja, P.N.,<br />

Srikanth Babu, M.S. Sativa 2016. Real time contingency measures to cope with rainfall<br />

variability in southern Karnataka. Indian Journal <strong>of</strong> Dryland Agricultural Research and<br />

Development 31(1): 37-43.<br />

Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance<br />

25 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

T1-06R-1005<br />

Enhancement <strong>of</strong> Rainfed Cotton Production Through Supplemental<br />

Irrigation in Vertisols Tract <strong>of</strong> Southern Tamil Nadu<br />

M. Manikandan* 1 , S. Manoharan 1 , K. Baskar 1 , V. Sanjivkumar 1 , G. Guru 1 and<br />

G. Ravindra Chary 2<br />

1 AICRP for Dryland Agriculture, Kovilpatti Main Centre, ARS, TNAU, Kovilpatti – 628 501<br />

2 ICAR- Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, Hyderabad-500 059, Telangana<br />

* manikandan.m@tnau.ac.in<br />

Rainwater harvesting through farm ponds in the rainfed areas is one <strong>of</strong> the most promising<br />

technology for enhancing crop productivity. Farm ponds would help the farmers to use stored<br />

water for managing the dry spells during the season. Studies have revealed that providing SI<br />

during dry periods at different stages <strong>of</strong> crop growth has improved the yields by 29 to 114 per<br />

cent for different crops. SI not only increases the yield but also improves water productivity<br />

when SI and rainwater are used conjunctively. Though sufficient records are available for SI<br />

as an effective practice to alleviate dry spell effects, some challenges <strong>of</strong> SI are to plan the timing<br />

and depth <strong>of</strong> water to be applied and the practical feasibility <strong>of</strong> storing and retaining water till<br />

the period when crops needed despite heavy seepage and evaporation losses (Oweis and<br />

Hachum, 2012). This study aims to assess the feasibility <strong>of</strong> using the farm pond water for giving<br />

supplemental irrigation to rabi cotton, particularly for farmers having small size land holdings<br />

in the rainfed areas.<br />

Methodology<br />

This research was conducted in AICRPDA Kovilpatti main centre at Agricultural Research<br />

Station, Kovilpatti, Tamil Nadu in India from 2011 to 2021. Vertisols constitute nearly 70 per<br />

cent <strong>of</strong> the total area. The depth <strong>of</strong> soil varies from 110 to 150 cm and the rate <strong>of</strong> infiltration is<br />

0.9 cm hr -1 . Soil develops typical cracks at least one cm wide and reaches a depth <strong>of</strong> more than<br />

50 cm during the period moisture stress. Annual average rainfall was 711 mm in 42 rainy days,<br />

with respect to seasonal rainfall, the main contribution was from north east monsoon (NEM)<br />

i.e. 393 mm. The experiment was conducted in rainfed cotton with two treatments viz. (i)<br />

providing supplemental irrigation to the crop and (ii) pure rainfed crop. Cotton (KC3) was<br />

grown with a spacing <strong>of</strong> 45 x 15 cm on the ridges, furrows were formed by 45 cm spacing.<br />

Crops were cultivated and all the practices were followed as per the crop production guide <strong>of</strong><br />

Tamil Nadu State. A rectangular shaped farm pond <strong>of</strong> 25 m x 13 m x 1.5 m, lined with random<br />

rubble masonry was used for harvesting run<strong>of</strong>f from a one ha catchment area. A 5 HP diesel<br />

engine was used for pumping water from the pond. One raingun with tripod stand having<br />

discharge rate <strong>of</strong> 3.5 lps and radius <strong>of</strong> throw <strong>of</strong> 20 m was used for sprinkling water. Changes<br />

in water level in the farm pond were observed during the rainy season and run<strong>of</strong>f drained into<br />

26 | Page Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

farm pond was worked out. Since the crops are grown in rainfed regions, there was no irrigation<br />

to the crop other than rainwater, the total rainwater utilized by the crop throughout the crop<br />

season to calculate rainwater use efficiency (RWUE). In case supplemental irrigation, the depth<br />

<strong>of</strong> supplemental irrigation would be added to the cumulative depth <strong>of</strong> rainfall.<br />

Results<br />

Annual rainfall and NEM rainfall, run<strong>of</strong>f causing rainfall, actual run<strong>of</strong>f generated, run<strong>of</strong>f water<br />

harvested in the pond during 2011 to 2021 is presented here.<br />

Year<br />

Run<strong>of</strong>f water generated and rainwater harvested in the farm pond<br />

Rainfall,<br />

mm (rainy<br />

days)<br />

Annual<br />

rainfall<br />

Excess /<br />

Deficit<br />

Rainfall,<br />

mm (rainy<br />

days)<br />

NEM<br />

rainfall<br />

Excess /<br />

Deficit<br />

Run<strong>of</strong>f<br />

causing<br />

rainfall,<br />

mm<br />

Run<strong>of</strong>f,<br />

mm<br />

Water<br />

harvested<br />

in pond, m 3<br />

2011 787.6 (42) 7% Excess 503.4 (22) 26% Excess 244.6 46.5 480<br />

2012 392.9 (23) 46% Deficit 228.3 (14) 42.4% Deficit 81.8 32.6 326<br />

2013 421.3 (28) 42% Deficit 252.8 (17) 35.4 % Deficit 105.8 41.0 409.8<br />

2014 666.8 (48) 7.7% Deficit 301.2 (21) 23 % Deficit 63.6 20.3 215<br />

2015 988.6 (52) 35.3 % Excess 475.8 (21) 21 % Excess 59.4 18.8 188<br />

2016 199.6 (15) 72 % Deficit 80.2 (7) 79.8 % Deficit 0 0 No run<strong>of</strong>f<br />

2017 801.7 (36) 12.3 % Excess 421.4 (17) 6.2 % Excess 282.4 26.8 268<br />

2018 410.6 (34) 42.5 % Deficit 213.9 (19) 46 % Deficit 0 0 No run<strong>of</strong>f<br />

2019 668.1 (46) 5.2 % Deficit 426.4 (28) 9.2 % Excess 108.9 25.8 258<br />

2020 905.6 (47) 29.5 % Excess 473.3 (26) 21.2 % Excess 125.6 27.4 274<br />

2021 914.7 (60) 28.65% Excess 532.3 (29) 33.9 % Excess 151.9 48.0 481<br />

Mean 650.68 (39) 355.36 (20) 111.27 26.11 263.62<br />

Out <strong>of</strong> 11 years, 5 years experienced excess annual and seasonal rainfall ranging from 7 to 35<br />

per cent over normal rainfall. Total water harvested in the farm pond over the study period was<br />

263.6 cubic m. Pond reaches its full capacity <strong>of</strong> 480 m 3 when NEM rainfall is 450 mm. SI was<br />

given when run<strong>of</strong>f water drained into pond was greater than 250 m 3 . Run<strong>of</strong>f coefficient<br />

obtained from rainfall-run<strong>of</strong>f was found to be 0.24.<br />

Ridges and furrows were found to be the most promising in-situ moisture conservation<br />

practices in the catchment area for cotton production. Rainwater harvested from this area was<br />

stored in the farm pond and was used for supplemental irrigation to 0.4 hectares when the dry<br />

spell exceeded 15 days during active crop growth stages. The response <strong>of</strong> SI on yield and<br />

RWUE in rainfed cotton production is presented as follows.<br />

Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance<br />

27 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Response <strong>of</strong> SI on yield and RWUE in rainfed cotton production<br />

Year<br />

NEM<br />

Rainfall<br />

Pure<br />

rainfed<br />

Yield, kg<br />

Pure<br />

rainfed+SI<br />

Increase in<br />

Yield<br />

SI,<br />

mm<br />

RWUE, kg ha -1 mm -1<br />

Pure<br />

rainfed<br />

Pure<br />

rainfed+SI<br />

2011/12 503.4 1515 1730 14.2 50 3.01 3.13<br />

2013/14 252.8 790 820 3.8 44 3.13 2.76<br />

2017/18 421.4 876 987 12.7 25 2.08 2.21<br />

2020/21 473.3 677 793 17.1 50 1.43 1.52<br />

Mean 355.36 964.50 1082.50 11.95 2.41 2.41<br />

Cotton crops responded positively to the SI for all the years. Further, giving supplemental<br />

irrigation was found to produce higher cotton production per unit <strong>of</strong> water than rainfed.<br />

Supplemental irrigation to a total depth <strong>of</strong> 50 mm resulted in 14.2 per cent, 12.7 per cent and<br />

17.1 per cent increased yield in cotton compared to that <strong>of</strong> unirrigated crop during rabi season<br />

<strong>of</strong> 2011-12, 2017-18 and 2020-21 respectively. During 2013-14, the yield difference between<br />

treatments was very less, hence this effect has been reflected in RWUE. The increase in yield<br />

<strong>of</strong> cotton by SI is mainly by the reduction <strong>of</strong> soil moisture stress experienced during the critical<br />

growth stages. Rainfed cotton combined with SI has recorded higher RWUE over pure rainfed<br />

cotton and it ranges from 1.52 to 3.13 kg ha -1 mm -1 .<br />

Conclusion<br />

This study examined the scope <strong>of</strong> supplemental irrigation during the moisture stress period for<br />

cotton production. The run<strong>of</strong>f coefficient obtained was 0.24. Supplemental irrigation from farm<br />

pond to cotton during vegetative, flowering, boll formation stages resulted 12.7 to 17.1 per cent<br />

increased yield. Rainwater combined with SI recorded higher RWUE <strong>of</strong> 1.52 to 3.13 kg ha -1<br />

mm -1 . At farm level run<strong>of</strong>f water harvesting in a pond and reusing harvested water through<br />

supplemental irrigation combined with in-situ rainwater management is a great option with a<br />

higher potential for increasing productivity in rainfed areas.<br />

References<br />

Oweis, T. and Hachum, A., 2012. Supplemental Irrigation—A highly efficient water-use<br />

practice. Aleppo, Syria, 16.<br />

28 | Page Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

T1-07R-1062<br />

Enhancing Climate Resilient Agriculture in Semi-Arid Region through<br />

Group Micro Irrigation by Collectivization and Equitable Sharing <strong>of</strong><br />

Groundwater: Case Study in Maharashtra and Telangana, India<br />

Arun Bhagat*, Upasana Koli, Jyothirmayee Kandula and Marcella Dsouza<br />

WOTR Centre for Resilience Studies (W-CReS), Watershed Organisation Trust (WOTR), Pune<br />

(India)<br />

*arun.bhagat@wotr.org.in<br />

Groundwater is one <strong>of</strong> the primary sources <strong>of</strong> irrigation for food production in many countries<br />

<strong>of</strong> the world, and India, which significantly contributes to the food supply for countries, is the<br />

most groundwater-dependent country on earth. Despite their importance, the resources are<br />

heading for a crisis in many regions, mainly due to their enormous exploitation to increase<br />

production to feed the growing population. Climate change, it is anticipated, will pose an<br />

additional significant threat to groundwater resources in the future (Shahid et al., 2017), and<br />

has affected agricultural practices to the extent that farmers have increased the use <strong>of</strong> synthetic<br />

fertilizers and agrochemicals to protect themselves from the damages. Therefore, looking at<br />

the challenging water scenario, the government has been stressing about increasing the efficient<br />

use <strong>of</strong> water. However, despite the numerous schemes, technological inputs, and new methods<br />

<strong>of</strong> productivity enhancement, it has scarcely addressed the water problem in its entirety. To<br />

address these issues and challenges, Watershed Organisation Trust (WOTR) undertook an<br />

action research project - the Group Micro Irrigation (GMI) approach, devised to enhance<br />

agriculture productivity for a group <strong>of</strong> smallholder farmers with special attention to efficient<br />

water use.<br />

Methodology<br />

Water is considered a common good rather than privately owned in this approach. This<br />

viewpoint is to help manage scarce water resources judiciously and equitably. The GMI<br />

approach comprises four main components: groundwater management on the supply and<br />

demand side, promotion <strong>of</strong> CRA practices, facilitation <strong>of</strong> market linkages, and integration <strong>of</strong><br />

applied research by providing small methods or tools to support farmers. In the first component<br />

<strong>of</strong> GMI, measures such as harvesting rainwater and construction <strong>of</strong> soil and water conservation<br />

structures to recharge groundwater are taken to support the supply side. And to support the<br />

demand side, accumulating private groundwater resources and distributing water through a<br />

common-drip-irrigation system are the measures taken. The second component <strong>of</strong> promoting<br />

Climate Resilient Agriculture (CRA) as a package <strong>of</strong> practices is a measure undertaken to boost<br />

soil health and plant resilience to ensure a harvest in the face <strong>of</strong> weather and environmental<br />

challenges. The third component involves encouraging market linkage through Farmer<br />

Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance<br />

29 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Producer Organisations (FPO), giving access to better prices. And the fourth component is<br />

about integrating applied research to support farmers using simple tools and methods includes<br />

maintaining field books by farmers, crop water budgeting, and assessing groundwater<br />

availability by testing well water depth and pump discharge.<br />

The study was focused on the water scare area <strong>of</strong> Maharashtra and Telangana states. The GMI<br />

model details are given here under.<br />

GMI<br />

Model<br />

Details <strong>of</strong> GMI models developed in Maharashtra and Telangana states<br />

Location<br />

No <strong>of</strong><br />

Farmers<br />

Year <strong>of</strong><br />

estb.<br />

Area<br />

(Acre)<br />

Water Source<br />

GMI-I Tigalkheda, Jalna (MS) 14 2017 32.45 Dugwell (01)<br />

GMI-II Ranmala, Ahmednagar (MS) 06 2020 06 Dugwell (01)<br />

GMI-III Bhangadewadi, Ahmednagar (MS) 47 2020 65.5 Large Farm<br />

Pond<br />

GMI-IV Israipalli, Mahabubnagar (TS) 18 2013 18 Borewells (03)<br />

GMI-V Badunapur, Rangareddy (TS) 6 2016 16.5 Borewells (06)<br />

GMI-VI Rampur, Rangareddy (TS) 9 2016 19.6 Borewells (06)<br />

Results<br />

Asignificant rise is observed in cropped and irrigated areas, cropping intensity, and crop and<br />

water productivity due to GMI intervention.<br />

Impact <strong>of</strong> GMI intervention on cropped and irrigated area, cropping intensity, and crop<br />

and water productivity<br />

Assessment indicator<br />

Average rise in the cropped area (%) 40.01<br />

Average rise in Irrigated area (%) 99.20<br />

Average rise in cropping intensity (%) 67.42<br />

Average rise in crop Productivity (%) 82.86<br />

Average rise in water productivity (%) 77.81<br />

Average change in cropping pattern<br />

Comparison between Pre and Post-intervention<br />

Shifted from grain crops to high-valued crops e.g. vegetable<br />

RULES (BY GROUPS) FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF THE GMI<br />

Water budgeting and crop planning before every season. The selection <strong>of</strong> crops should be the same for all or<br />

with the same harvesting duration based on the water budget decisions<br />

Compulsory use <strong>of</strong> micro-irrigation systems and water-intensive crops are not allowed when water<br />

availability is limited<br />

Follow climate-resilient agricultural practices<br />

A compulsory contribution <strong>of</strong> group funds based on GMI land area for maintenance and repair expenditures<br />

30 | Page Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Conclusion<br />

The assessment revealed that the GMI approach had a significant impact in addressing issues<br />

related to the sustainable use and equitable sharing <strong>of</strong> water resources, and the barriers to<br />

adopting both micro-irrigation and climate-resilient farming practices. At the field level, a rise<br />

in cropping intensity with diversified crops <strong>of</strong> high economic value and increased yield and<br />

water productivity resulted from this approach's effectiveness. Also, it enabled an attitude <strong>of</strong><br />

cooperation rather than competition, helped strengthen interpersonal relationships through<br />

constant and effective coordination, and lowered individual investment. Additionally, it<br />

provided easy access to subsidies and water-efficient technologies like micro-irrigation<br />

systems for those who otherwise could not afford them within the group. It perpetuated risktaking<br />

abilities to indulge in experimenting with varied and advanced agricultural techniques<br />

and technology and provided sufficient bargaining power for their outputs.<br />

References<br />

Shahid, S., Alamgir, M., Wang, X. J., & Eslamian, S. (2017). Climate change impacts on and<br />

adaptation to groundwater. In Handbook <strong>of</strong> Drought and Water Scarcity, pp. 107-124, CRC<br />

Press.<br />

Soil Preferential Flow: A Case Study from Semi-arid Watershed<br />

Pushpanjali, K.S. Reddy, K. Sammi Reddy and Vinod Kumar Singh<br />

ICAR-Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, Hyderabad- 500 059, India<br />

T1-08R-1149<br />

Semi-arid ecosystems are important ecological and economic hotspots that comprise over 40%<br />

(6B ha) <strong>of</strong> the world’s total land surface. In general, a semi-arid landscape is characterized by<br />

shallow soils and large proportions <strong>of</strong> bare rock, both expected to influence infiltration and<br />

groundwater recharge processes considerably. The dynamic soil matrix generally precludes the<br />

use <strong>of</strong> the traditional, deterministic modelling approach to predict flow and transport at the field<br />

scale. Preferential flow is a generic term used for obvious flow paths like biopores, fractures<br />

and macropores whereby water movement through a porous medium follows favoured routes<br />

bypassing other parts <strong>of</strong> the medium (Luxmoore 1991). It was not until the late seventies that<br />

increasing agricultural and environmental concerns created a renewed interest in the subject<br />

(Beven and Germann 2013). Since then, numerous studies have been undertaken to describe,<br />

measure, and model preferential flow. Application <strong>of</strong> geographic information system (GIS) and<br />

image analysis helps reduce field work and traversing and establish relationship between<br />

landform and soil in the watershed and its sub-divisions.<br />

A semi-arid landscape is characterized by shallow soils and large proportions <strong>of</strong> bare rock, both<br />

expected to influence infiltration and groundwater recharge processes considerably. The dynamic<br />

Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance<br />

31 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

soil matrix generally precludes the use <strong>of</strong> the traditional, deterministic modelling approach to<br />

predict flow and transport at the field scale thus it is <strong>of</strong>ten very difficult to estimate solute transport<br />

by a preferential flow. Different methods have been used for evaluating or quantifying the<br />

characteristics <strong>of</strong> macropores and preferential flow. Various researchers found that food-grade dye<br />

Brilliant Blue FCF has been an excellent dye tracer for soil water flow and solute transport owing<br />

to the high-water solubility, limited toxicity, similar transport property to water, low adsorption in<br />

sand soil, and distinct visibility. A better understanding <strong>of</strong> preferential water flow would benefit<br />

for the understanding <strong>of</strong> the ecological and hydrological functions <strong>of</strong> soil. So, the overall goal <strong>of</strong><br />

this study was to investigate the role <strong>of</strong> preferential flow, as affected by different land use, on the<br />

subsurface movement <strong>of</strong> water in a micro-watershed. A micro-watershed at Hayathnagar,<br />

Hyderabad, India, was taken up to generate detailed information on soil preferential flow.<br />

Hayathnagar micro-watershed is situated in Hayathnagar village, Rangareddy district <strong>of</strong> Telangana<br />

lying between 17 ° 20’18.00’’to17 ° 21’8.94” N latitude and 78 ° 35’26.14’’ to 78 ° 36’4.89’’ E<br />

longitudes. The total area <strong>of</strong> the micro-watershed is 154 ha. The area has been divided into 3<br />

units upper-reach, middle and lower-reach. The area under upper-reach is 54 ha, middle-reach is<br />

60 ha and the lower-reach is about 40 ha.<br />

The study shows significant effect <strong>of</strong> preferential flow on the nutrient movement down the pr<strong>of</strong>ile<br />

in the different land-use. At the upper reach, SOC for all the land-use systems was between 0.4 to<br />

0.5% in flow path while in the soil matrix it was found to be between 0.25 to 0.35%, similar results<br />

were observed for middle reach. Soil microbial biomass carbon was 50 to 70 % higher in flow path<br />

than in the soil matrix. These findings lead us to understand that there exist a completely different<br />

channels in the soil letting nutrients and microbes to travel within the horizons in soil.<br />

Upper reach<br />

32 | Page Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Middle reach<br />

Lower reach<br />

Typical soil pr<strong>of</strong>ile under different elevation and land use (upto 30 cm)<br />

Based on preferential flow fraction parameters compared under different elevations, the<br />

preferential flow advantage <strong>of</strong> forest land is more evident than that <strong>of</strong> fallow land. In upper<br />

reach <strong>of</strong> watershed, surface soil mostly has heterogeneous matrix flow and fingering<br />

while subsurface was observed to have more macropores with low interaction. Thus, the<br />

surface soil shows flow instability due to coarse texture and water repellence while subsurface<br />

is poorly permeable soil. Middle and lower reach was heterogeneous matrix flow and fingering<br />

as major flow type in the surface while macropores with mixed interaction in the subsurface<br />

<strong>of</strong> the soil pr<strong>of</strong>ile. While taking watershed as unit to study preferential flow, we found that<br />

different land uses and elevations play an important role in deciding the type <strong>of</strong> preferential<br />

flow which may lead to better management practices <strong>of</strong> respective soils for better water and<br />

crop productivity.<br />

Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance<br />

33 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

References<br />

Beven K and Germann P. 2013 Macropores and water flow in soils revisited. Water<br />

Resources Research, 49:3071-3092.<br />

Luxmoore RJ. 1991. On preferential flow and its measurement (No. CONF-911255-1).<br />

OakRidge National Lab., TN (United States).<br />

T1-09R-1172<br />

Micro-Irrigation Based Supplemental Irrigation Using Harvested<br />

Rainwater for Sustainable Agriculture Under Rainfed Ecosystems<br />

Abrar Yousuf, M.J. Singh, Anil Khokhar, Parminder Singh Sandhu, Mohammad Amin<br />

Bhat, Balwinder Singh Dhillon<br />

Punjab Agricultural University-Regional Research Station, AICRPDA Centre<br />

Ballowal Saunkhri, Balachaur, Punjab-144521, India<br />

The Indian economy is mainly dependent on agriculture which contributes 21% <strong>of</strong> the<br />

country’s capital GDP and 60 percent <strong>of</strong> employment potential. Out <strong>of</strong> the total net sown area<br />

in India, about 51% is under rainfed agriculture, which contributes around 40% <strong>of</strong> the total<br />

food production. The rainfed agriculture is usually at risk as crop security depends on arrival,<br />

distribution and withdrawal <strong>of</strong> rainfall during the monsoon season. Crop failures, taking heavy<br />

toll on farmers’ income, are very common in rainfed ecologies due to the dearth <strong>of</strong> the irrigation<br />

water. In Punjab, rainfed farming is being practiced in lower Shivalik region, locally known as<br />

Kandi area. This region is characterized by erratic distribution <strong>of</strong> rainfall, small landholdings,<br />

lack <strong>of</strong> irrigation facilities, heavy biotic pressure on the natural resources, inadequate<br />

vegetative cover, heavy soil erosion, landslides, declining soil fertility and frequent crop<br />

failures resulting in scarcity <strong>of</strong> food, fodder and fuel (Yousuf et al., 2017).In this region, about<br />

80% <strong>of</strong> total annual rainfall is received from July to September. Though sufficient rainfall is<br />

received to meet the crop water requirement, the crops are subjected to early, mid-season and<br />

terminal droughts leading to crop failures and low yields. To raise the productivity <strong>of</strong> rainfed<br />

crops in the region, it is necessary to harvest the excess rainwater. Rainwater management is<br />

one <strong>of</strong> the most critical components <strong>of</strong> rainfed farming and the successful production <strong>of</strong> crops<br />

largely depends on how efficiently soil moisture is conserved in situ and the surplus run-<strong>of</strong>f is<br />

harvested, stored and reused for supplemental irrigation and also for recharging (Rao et al.,<br />

2017). Farm pond technology is identified as one <strong>of</strong> the most important and cost-effective<br />

technology for management <strong>of</strong> the excess rainwater. The excess rainwater, termed as surface<br />

run<strong>of</strong>f, can be harvested in farm ponds and utilized for supplemental or life-saving irrigation<br />

during dry spells. Keeping this in view, an experiment was conducted to study the effect <strong>of</strong><br />

supplemental irrigation on yield, water use efficiency and economics <strong>of</strong> maize-wheat and<br />

vegetable-based cropping systems.<br />

34 | Page Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Methodology<br />

The study was conducted at the research farm <strong>of</strong> AICRPDA centre Ballowal Saunkhri during<br />

2019-2021.The study area lies in sub-humid subtropical climate having hot summers and cold<br />

winters. The study area receives an average annual rainfall <strong>of</strong> about 1050 mm, out <strong>of</strong> which<br />

80% is received during the monsoon season. The farm pond having a capacity <strong>of</strong> 696 m 3 was<br />

constructed to harvest the excess rainwater. The harvested rainwater was used to provide<br />

supplemental irrigation to maize and okra during kharif and wheat and pea during rabi season.<br />

The supplemental irrigation was applied to maize and okra through furrow irrigation. The<br />

sprinkler irrigation was applied to wheat while drip irrigation was applied to pea. The<br />

experiment was laid in the random block design.<br />

Catchment-storage-command relationship <strong>of</strong> farm pond<br />

Catchment area (ha) 1.8<br />

Storage capacity, m 3 696<br />

Command area, ha 0.5<br />

Catchment-storage Ratio 25.8<br />

Storage command Ratio 0.14<br />

Catchment command Ratio 3.6<br />

Method <strong>of</strong> irrigation<br />

Amount <strong>of</strong> water applied (mm)<br />

Results<br />

Maize, okra and pea: furrow: wheat: sprinkler<br />

Maize and okra: 50 mm, pea 50 mm, wheat: 50 mm<br />

During kharif season, one supplemental irrigation in maize and okra resulted in yield <strong>of</strong> 3758<br />

kg/ha and 126.5 q/ha which was 70.2% and 75.2 % higher over rainfed maize (2208 kg/ha) and<br />

okra (72.2 q/ha), respectively. The water use efficiency increased by about 38.7% and 46.6%<br />

in maize and wheat, respectively due to the application <strong>of</strong> supplemental irrigation. Similarly,<br />

the supplemental irrigation resulted in increased B-C ratio by 60.7% and 62.5% in maize and<br />

okra respectively. During rabi season, one supplemental irrigation to wheat resulted in 65.9%<br />

higher yield over rainfed wheat. While in pea, an increase <strong>of</strong> about 76% was observed in pod<br />

yield over the rainfed pea The water use efficiency increased from 11.25 to 19.67 in wheat, and<br />

6.28 to 14.96 in pea due to the application <strong>of</strong> supplemental irrigation. Similarly, the<br />

supplemental irrigation resulted in increased B:C ratio by 53.5% and 41.1% in wheat and pea,<br />

respectively.<br />

Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance<br />

35 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Effect <strong>of</strong> supplemental irrigation on crop yield, water use efficiency and economics<br />

Crops<br />

With<br />

supplemental<br />

irrigation<br />

Economic yield<br />

(kg ha -1 )<br />

Without<br />

supplemental<br />

irrigation<br />

Water use efficiency<br />

(kg ha -1 mm -1 )<br />

With<br />

supplemental<br />

irrigation<br />

Without<br />

supplemental<br />

irrigation<br />

With<br />

supplemental<br />

irrigation<br />

B:C<br />

Without<br />

supplemental<br />

irrigation<br />

WSI WOSI WSI WOSI WSI WOSI<br />

Maize 3758 2208 5.34 3.85 2.09 1.30<br />

Okra 12654 7224 18.47 12.60 2.47 1.52<br />

Wheat 3448 2078 19.67 11.25 2.41 1.57<br />

Pea 3288 1869 14.96 6.28 1.75 1.24<br />

Conclusions<br />

Farm pond is a farmer friendly option for rainwater harvesting toprovide life-saving irrigation<br />

to standing crops when theyare exposed to mid-term/terminal drought and also forpre-sowing<br />

irrigation in post-rainy crops in rainfed areas.The application <strong>of</strong> supplemental irrigation<br />

resulted in increased yield, WUE and B-C ratio in both kharif and rabi crops.<br />

References<br />

Rao, C.S., Rejani, R., Rao, C.A., Rao, K.V., Osman, M., Reddy, K.S., Kumar, M and Kumar<br />

P. 2017. Farm ponds for climate-resilient rainfed agriculture. Curr. Sci., 112:471-477.<br />

Yousuf, A., Bhardwaj, A., Tiwari, A.K and Bhatt, V.K., 2017. Simulation <strong>of</strong> run<strong>of</strong>f and<br />

sediment yield from a forest micro watershed in Shivalik foothills using WEPP Model.<br />

Indian J. Soil Conserv., 45:21–27.<br />

T1-10R-1382<br />

Increasing the Productivity <strong>of</strong> Rainfed Rice-Based Double Cropping<br />

System Through Supplemental Irrigation Under Medium Lowland<br />

Situation <strong>of</strong> North Bank Plains Zone (NBPZ) <strong>of</strong> Assam<br />

Arunjyoti Sonowal, Bibha Ozah, Bikram Borkotoki, Pallab Kumar Sarma, Nikhilesh<br />

Baruah, Rekhashree Kalita, Prabal Saikia, Ravindra Chary<br />

AICRP for Dryland Agriculture, Biswanath College <strong>of</strong> Agriculture,<br />

Assam Agricultural University, Biswanath Chariali, Assam-784176, India<br />

Rice is one <strong>of</strong> the predominant cereal crops in the north-eastern part <strong>of</strong> India and is grown in<br />

majority <strong>of</strong> the area <strong>of</strong> Assam. In Assam, rice occupies about two-third <strong>of</strong> the total cropped<br />

area in the state. The Lakhimpur district is located in the north eastern part <strong>of</strong> Assam and agroclimatically<br />

lies in the north <strong>of</strong> river Brahmaputra. The average rainfall in this region is 2949<br />

mm. The region is also called as district <strong>of</strong> rivers due to presence <strong>of</strong> turbulent rivers and<br />

36 | Page Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

tributaries spreading all over the district. It may also be noted that the sali season mainly<br />

coincides with the time <strong>of</strong> heavy rainfall in the district, i.e., May/June-July/August due to which<br />

rice crop were badly affected and there occurs significant reduction in the production. Keeping<br />

the importance <strong>of</strong> above facts in mind, the present study was conducted with the hypothesis<br />

that productivity and pr<strong>of</strong>itability <strong>of</strong> rainfed rice fallow systems can be improved by growing<br />

rabi crops as second crop with the application <strong>of</strong> supplemental irrigation during dry spells only<br />

with the objectives: i) To study the effect <strong>of</strong> rice varieties on the performance <strong>of</strong> subsequent<br />

rabi crops, ii) To find out the efficiency <strong>of</strong> harvested rainwater on productivity <strong>of</strong> rabi crops.<br />

Methodology<br />

The field experiment was conducted at the experimental field <strong>of</strong> Regional Agricultural<br />

Research Station, North Lakhimpur, AAU, Assam in collaboration with All India Coordinated<br />

Research Project for Dryland Agriculture, Biswanath Chariali centre during 2018-2019, 2019-<br />

2020, 2020-2021 in randomized block design. It is situated at 101 m above mean sea level<br />

(MSL) with 26°48' and 27 o 53' Northern latitude and 93 o 42' and 94 o 20' East longitude. The<br />

texture <strong>of</strong> the soil <strong>of</strong> the experimental field was clay loam with a pH <strong>of</strong> 4.89 and organic carbon<br />

<strong>of</strong> 0.69. The field capacity <strong>of</strong> the soil is 23.41% and wilting point is 5.10%, soil was medium<br />

in available nitrogen (360.20 kg ha -1 ), available phosphorus (23.45 kg ha -1 ), and available<br />

potassium (170.65 kg ha -1 ). The rice-based cropping system was evaluated in a randomized<br />

block design with two factor combinations involving four replications. The factors were sowing<br />

dates (second crops preceded by medium duration rice varieties and second crops preceded by<br />

long duration rice varieties) and types <strong>of</strong> irrigation (flood irrigation and lifesaving sprinkler<br />

irrigation during dry spells only). The age <strong>of</strong> seedlings were 25 days and 60 days for medium<br />

duration rice variety (Kanaklata) and long duration rice variety (Gitesh) respectively. The<br />

individual plot size was 50 m 2 (10 m × 5 m) with a gross area <strong>of</strong> 2500 m 2 and the rabi crops<br />

grown were toria (TS-67), niger (GA-10), pea (Kaveri Improved). The seed rate <strong>of</strong> toria, niger,<br />

and pea were 10 kg ha -1 , 8 kg ha -1 , and 50 kg ha -1 respectively. Post harvesting <strong>of</strong> the kharif<br />

crops (medium and long duration rice varieties), the land preparation was done by tractordrawn<br />

plough followed by harrowing and levelling. The spacings were maintained at 25 cm x<br />

10 cm (Toria), 25cm x 5 cm (Niger), and 30cm x 10cm (Pea) row-to-row and plant-to-plant<br />

respectively. The fertilizer was applied as per recommendation <strong>of</strong> the package <strong>of</strong> practices<br />

(POP) <strong>of</strong> Assam in terms <strong>of</strong> Urea, SSP, and MOP. The crops were sown in the second fortnight<br />

<strong>of</strong> November and first fortnight <strong>of</strong> December. The daily meteorological data (rainfall) during<br />

the period <strong>of</strong> experimentation was collected at the meteorological observatory <strong>of</strong> the station,<br />

RARS North Lakhimpur, Assam Agricultural University, Lakhimpur. The soil properties were<br />

analysed separately after the harvesting <strong>of</strong> all the rabi crops. The water was applied as life<br />

saving irrigation during the occurrence <strong>of</strong> 10-days dry spell only through hose pipes and<br />

sprinkler irrigation systems from the harvested rainwater during the rabi crops only. The yield<br />

Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance<br />

37 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

<strong>of</strong> the rabi crops was converted to rice equivalent yields and comparison was done amongst<br />

the rabi crops (toria, niger and pea).<br />

Results<br />

The long duration rice variety (4-6.5 t ha -1 ) gives better yield than the medium duration rice<br />

variety (4-5.5 t ha -1 ). The yield <strong>of</strong> each rabi crops significantly decreased when sown after<br />

Gitesh (long duration rice variety) as compared to sowing <strong>of</strong> the same rabi crops after<br />

Kalanklata (medium duration variety). Though, the types <strong>of</strong> irrigation didn’t significantly affect<br />

crop yield, but 50 % water could be saved with sprinkler irrigation as compared to flood<br />

irrigation. The system yield <strong>of</strong> the cropping sequence reduces when sowing was delayed from<br />

1 st <strong>of</strong> December to 15 th Dec with flood and sprinkler irrigation, respectively. The sowing date<br />

had an impact in the yield and yield attributes <strong>of</strong> all the rabi crops irrespective <strong>of</strong> the irrigation<br />

treatments and the sprinkler irrigation gives better yield than the flooded irrigation for all the<br />

rabi crops. The system yield comes to be higher in case <strong>of</strong> all the rabi crops preceded by<br />

medium duration kanaklata variety, which indicates that the sowing date had an impact in the<br />

rabi crops irrespective <strong>of</strong> the irrigation types applied. The irrigation water used for rabi crops<br />

(preceded by medium duration rice variety) is 14% more than the water used for rabi crops<br />

(preceded by long duration rice variety). The difference in irrigation water used for the rabi<br />

crops in both the different varieties <strong>of</strong> preceded rice varieties is only due to the dry spells<br />

occurred during the crop periods. Though the irrigation water applied is at par in both the<br />

sprinkler and flooded irrigation, the time consumption (thus, more labour intensive) is more in<br />

case <strong>of</strong> flooded irrigation. The lowland areas can be used for growing <strong>of</strong> the rabi crops with<br />

life-saving irrigation depending on the dry spells occurred after the medium and long duration<br />

crops rather than keeping it fallow (general tradition <strong>of</strong> the farmers) in such land situations.<br />

The interaction effect <strong>of</strong> sowing date and irrigation types on the growth and yield attributing<br />

characters and yield <strong>of</strong> the crops are presented.<br />

System yield: The system yields <strong>of</strong> the different cropping sequences (rice-toria, rice-niger and<br />

rice-pea) were calculated for each year individually and pooled analysis was done. The study<br />

revealed that cropping sequence <strong>of</strong> medium duration rice (Kanaklata) – Pea shows the highest<br />

system yield <strong>of</strong> 88.43 q ha -1 and the lowest system yield (58.32 q ha -1 ) was observed in cropping<br />

sequence <strong>of</strong> Long duration rice (Gitesh) – Niger amongst all the cropping sequences<br />

respectively.<br />

38 | Page Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

System yield <strong>of</strong> the different cropping sequences based on two types <strong>of</strong> life saving<br />

irrigation during the study period<br />

Sl.<br />

No.<br />

Cropping sequence<br />

1. Medium duration rice<br />

(Kanaklata) -Toria<br />

2. Medium duration rice<br />

(Kanaklata) –Toria<br />

3. Long duration rice<br />

(Gitesh) -Toria<br />

4. Long duration rice<br />

(Gitesh) -Toria<br />

5. Medium duration rice<br />

(Kanaklata) -Niger<br />

6. Medium duration<br />

rice(Kanaklata) –<br />

Niger<br />

7. Long duration rice<br />

(Gitesh) - Niger<br />

8. Long duration rice<br />

(Gitesh) - Niger<br />

9. Medium duration rice<br />

(Kanaklata) -Pea<br />

10. Medium duration rice<br />

(Kanaklata) –Pea<br />

11. Long duration rice<br />

(Gitesh) - Pea<br />

12. Long duration rice<br />

(Gitesh) - Pea<br />

Types <strong>of</strong><br />

life saving<br />

irrigation<br />

System<br />

Yield<br />

2018-19<br />

System<br />

Yield<br />

2019-20<br />

System<br />

Yield<br />

2020-21<br />

System<br />

Yield<br />

(Pooled)<br />

B:C<br />

Flood 94.43 77.32 79.72 83.82 2.13<br />

Sprinkler 90.93 78.71 81.96 83.87 2.20<br />

Flood 60.98 53.45 72.00 62.14 0.81<br />

Sprinkler 65.85 55.66 77.75 66.42 0.92<br />

Flood 61.81 52.50 61.73 58.68 1.75<br />

Sprinkler 62.43 53.78 62.66 59.62 1.83<br />

Flood 55.28 50.23 69.46 58.32 1.16<br />

Sprinkler 54.39 51.10 69.84 58.44 0.89<br />

Flood 85.45 77.75 85.60 82.93 1.63<br />

Sprinkler 85.65 82.65 96.98 88.43 1.71<br />

Flood 76.1 66.90 85.90 76.30 1.24<br />

Sprinkler 76.6 68.75 87.40 77.58 1.32<br />

Conclusion<br />

The yield <strong>of</strong> each rabi crops significantly decreased when sown after Gitesh (long duration rice<br />

variety) as compared to sowing <strong>of</strong> the same rabi crops after Kalanklata (medium duration<br />

variety). The system yield <strong>of</strong> the cropping sequence reduces when sowing was delayed from<br />

1 st <strong>of</strong> December to 15 th Dec with flood and sprinkler irrigation, respectively. The sowing date<br />

had an impact in the yield and yield attributes <strong>of</strong> all the rabi crops irrespective <strong>of</strong> the irrigation<br />

treatments and the sprinkler irrigation gives better yield than the flooded irrigation for all the<br />

rabi crops. The system yield comes to be higher in case <strong>of</strong> all the rabi crops preceded by<br />

medium duration kanaklata variety, which indicates that the sowing date had an impact in the<br />

rabi crops irrespective <strong>of</strong> the irrigation types applied. The lowland areas can be used for<br />

growing <strong>of</strong> the rabi crops with life-saving irrigation depending on the dry spells occurred after<br />

Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance<br />

39 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

the medium and long duration crops rather than keeping it fallow (general tradition <strong>of</strong> the<br />

farmers) in such land situations.<br />

T1-11R-1402<br />

Evaluation <strong>of</strong> In Situ Moisture Conservation Techniques for Sustainable<br />

Productivity <strong>of</strong> Chick pea in Bundelkhand Region<br />

C.M. Tripathi, Manoj Kumar, Satish Pathak and K.S. Shukla<br />

Deendayal Research Institute, Tulsi Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Ganiwan, Chitrakoot 210206, M.P.<br />

Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) is commonly known as gram which is one <strong>of</strong> the important pulse<br />

crop <strong>of</strong> India. About 65% <strong>of</strong> global area with 68% <strong>of</strong> Global chickpea is contributed by India.<br />

In India, the area under chickpea was 7.37 million hectares with a production <strong>of</strong> 5.891 million<br />

tons and productivity <strong>of</strong> 799.19 kg ha -1 during rabi 2018-19 (Agropedia). In India, Madhya<br />

Pradesh is one <strong>of</strong> the major chickpea producing states. The problem under dryland agriculture<br />

is low yield and unstable production. Despite the realization that it is much difficult to increase<br />

the production from drylands, it cannot be neglected, as a large number <strong>of</strong> farmers with more<br />

than two-thirds <strong>of</strong> the cultivated area <strong>of</strong> the country is involved. Soil moisture conserve is a big<br />

challenge <strong>of</strong> dryland area, because its area is poor and unevenly distributed <strong>of</strong> rainfall for the<br />

period <strong>of</strong> crop growing stages. While, the soil moisture is utilized to crop for transpiration and<br />

taken up <strong>of</strong> nutrient, when the rainfall becomes insufficient to meet the potential needs to<br />

transpiration. These are causes to depletion in soil moisture storage and reduced the production<br />

and a situation which may be designated as agricultural drought. The major problem is<br />

agricultural drought. Agricultural drought reduced through the application <strong>of</strong> various In Situ<br />

moisture conserving technologies i.e. Contour bunding, Trench cum bund, land levelling,<br />

mulching and land shaping, and enhanced soil moisture conserving capability and productivity<br />

<strong>of</strong> this reason.<br />

Methodology<br />

The demonstrations (36) were organized on farmer’s field to demonstrate the impact <strong>of</strong><br />

moisture conservation technology on chick pea productivity over three years during kharif<br />

2015 - 2018 at Tithara and Rampurva villages at farmer’s fields in Chitrakoot under<br />

Bundelkhand reason. The soil <strong>of</strong> demonstration plots ranged from medium black to loamy soil.<br />

The average rainfall <strong>of</strong> this district is 850 mm and more than 75% <strong>of</strong> the precipitation is<br />

received over four months i.e. July - October. Five technologies were comprised like contour<br />

bunding, trench cum bund, land level and bunding, land shaping and farmer practices. The<br />

farmers used all packages and practices <strong>of</strong> this crop remaining to above technologies. The<br />

demonstrations were conducted to study the increase percentage <strong>of</strong> yield and moisture percent.<br />

The yield data were collected from both the demonstration and farmers practice by random<br />

40 | Page Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

crop cutting method. Qualitative data were converted into quantitative form and expressed in<br />

terms <strong>of</strong> per cent increase in yield calculated using following formula:<br />

(Potential yield – Demonstration yield)<br />

Technology index = X 100<br />

(Potential yield)<br />

Technology gap = Potential Yield – Demonstration yield<br />

Extension gap = Demonstration yield – Farmers practices yield<br />

(Improved practices – Farmers practices)<br />

% increased over farmers practices =<br />

(Farmers practices)<br />

X 100<br />

Tabular analysis involving simple statistical tools like mean was done by standard formula to<br />

analyze the data and draw conclusions and implications. For technologies, different extension<br />

approaches were made. In this region was supplied with moisture conservation technologies<br />

through KVK, Chitrakoot because more than area is to be found in undulated situation. The<br />

technology could successfully out yield all other farmers practices and recorded eye-catching<br />

higher yield. During 2018, the area under technology expanded horizontally to 120 hectares<br />

from a mere 2.5 hectare during first year (2015) <strong>of</strong> introduction and adopted by 31 farmers in<br />

2 villages. Due to efforts <strong>of</strong> KVK, scientists field visit, interpersonal communication and<br />

individual efforts <strong>of</strong> the farmers, the technology could spread to more than area <strong>of</strong> district.<br />

Results<br />

Effect <strong>of</strong> in situ moisture conservation practices on grain yield: Results <strong>of</strong> in situ moisture<br />

conservation techniques demonstrations was conducted during rabi 2015 and 2016 at farmers<br />

field. During the investigation years, the maximum chick pea grain yield was recorded with<br />

land levelling and bunding fallowed by mulching as compare to farmer practice. The enhanced<br />

grain yield 17.71% with creation <strong>of</strong> bunding and levelling as compared to farmers practices.<br />

The creation <strong>of</strong> land levelling and bunding to improve the soil moisture and nutrient availability<br />

resulted that enhanced yield over farmers practices. Improved soil moisture was mainly due to<br />

stay <strong>of</strong> water in field and reduced run<strong>of</strong>f intensity <strong>of</strong> water which facilitated better crop growth<br />

and yield <strong>of</strong> chick pea.<br />

Performance <strong>of</strong> technologies under dry land situation in chick pea crop (Mean data <strong>of</strong> 3 years)<br />

Technologies<br />

Area<br />

(ha)<br />

Benefited<br />

farmers<br />

Average Yield (q ha -1 )<br />

P. Yield Demo. Increase %<br />

Av.<br />

G.I.<br />

Av.<br />

N.I.<br />

B:C<br />

Ratio<br />

Contour bunding 3.0 6 24.00 15.25 16.41 61000 35500 2.39<br />

Trench cum bund 3.5 7 24.00 14.95 12.37 59800 34300 2.35<br />

Land level and<br />

bunding<br />

5.48 11 24.00 15.92 17.71 63680 38180 2.50<br />

Land shaping 2.8 7 24.00 14.80 11.48 59200 33700 2.32<br />

Farmer practices<br />

(Undulated land)<br />

- - 24.00 13.10 0.00 52400 26900 2.05<br />

Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance<br />

41 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Performance <strong>of</strong> technologies under dry land situation in chick pea crop (Mean data <strong>of</strong> 3 years)<br />

Technologies<br />

Moisture<br />

(%)<br />

Extension<br />

gap (q ha -1 )<br />

Soil Moisture status: The average soil moisture was highest in levelling land and bunding<br />

fallowed by contour bunding and further in land shape techniques. Further it is indicated that<br />

all in situ techniques recorded higher moisture conserve during the crop growth period as<br />

compare to farmer’s practices.<br />

Extension gap: Higher extension gap 12.9 q ha -1 was found during investigation years. This<br />

extension gap should be assigned to adoption <strong>of</strong> improved transfer technology in<br />

demonstrations practices resulted in higher seed yield than traditional farmer practices. This<br />

emphasized the need to educate the farmers through various means for more adoption <strong>of</strong><br />

improved high yielding varieties and newly improved agricultural technologies to bridge the<br />

wide extension gap. More use <strong>of</strong> new high yielding varieties by the farmers will subsequently<br />

change this alarming trend <strong>of</strong> extension gap. The new technologies will eventually lead to the<br />

farmers to discontinuance <strong>of</strong> old varieties with the new technology.<br />

Technology gap: The demonstrations recorded the technology gap <strong>of</strong> 10.9 q ha -1 during the<br />

study year, which was higher than that during 2016. The technology gap observed may be<br />

attributed to dissimilarity in the soil and weather situation.<br />

Technology index: The lower value <strong>of</strong> technology index is more feasibility. The technology<br />

index was reduced average 45 per cent during the experimentation year, which shows the<br />

higher feasibility <strong>of</strong> the demonstrated technology.<br />

Gross and net monitory returns: Among the various technologies, land level and bunding<br />

recorded higher average gross and net income (Rs. 63680 ha -1 and 38180 ha -1 ) as compared to<br />

all other technologies and fallowed by contour bunding (Rs. 61000 ha -1 and 35500 ha -1 ).<br />

However, the lowest gross and net monitory return was found with farmers practices (Rs. 52400<br />

ha -1 and 26900 ha -1 ) in traditional method. Maximum B:C ratio recorded with bunding and<br />

levelling (2.50) fallowed by contour bunding (2.39) over rest <strong>of</strong> the technologies. Therefore,<br />

minimum B:C ratio was found with farmers practices (2.05).<br />

Technology gap<br />

(q ha -1 )<br />

Technology<br />

index (%)<br />

Contour bunding 26.2 10.75 8.75 36.46<br />

Trench cum bund 23.5 11.05 9.05 37.71<br />

Land level and bunding 28.1 10.08 8.08 33.67<br />

Land shaping 24.8 11.2 9.2 38.33<br />

Farmer practices 22.7 12.9 10.9 45.42<br />

42 | Page Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Conclusion<br />

It is concluded that the evaluation <strong>of</strong> various in-situ moisture conservation techniques in chick<br />

pea crop under dry land situation in Bundelkhand region. Among the technologies, higher yield<br />

was recorded with land levelling and bunding practice and further improve soil moisture<br />

followed by contour bunding over to farmers practices in above situation.<br />

T1-11aR-1526<br />

Jalkund: Low-cost Water Harvesting Structure for Sustainable Livelihood<br />

in Rainfed Agroecosystem <strong>of</strong> Chandel district, Manipur, India<br />

Kangjam Sonamani Singh*<br />

Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Chandel<br />

ICAR Research Complex for NEH Region, Manipur<br />

* sonamanisingh@gmail.com<br />

Climate change is one <strong>of</strong> the biggest environmental threats facing the world, affecting natural<br />

resources and thus potentially impacting food production and security, sustained water supply,<br />

biodiversity <strong>of</strong> forests and other natural ecosystems, human health, and settlements. Chandel<br />

is one <strong>of</strong> the districts most strongly affected by climate change. The threat is especially greater<br />

wherever people’s livelihoods are particularly dependent on natural resources. In these<br />

vulnerable areas, climate adaptation measures are <strong>of</strong> central importance for the protection <strong>of</strong><br />

rural livelihoods and for ensuring sustainable development. Field observation was conducted<br />

during the rabi season <strong>of</strong> 2019, the Kharif and rabi season <strong>of</strong> 2020 and the Kharif season <strong>of</strong><br />

2021 at farmers’ fields with the objective to study the sustainable livelihood <strong>of</strong> the hill farmers<br />

<strong>of</strong> Chandonpokpi Village, Chandel District, Manipur, India. The rainwater or run-<strong>of</strong>f from the<br />

mountain streams can be harvested using an eco-friendly low-cost rainwater harvesting<br />

structure called Jalkund and used for multiple purposes. A dimension <strong>of</strong> 5 m x 4 m x 1.5 m has<br />

been found optimum for hills. During winter months when there is little or no rainfall, water<br />

conserved in poly-lined ponds (Jalkund) acts as a lifeline for the seasonal crops. Life-saving<br />

irrigation provided by these Jalkund broke the shackles <strong>of</strong> the otherwise age-old monocropping<br />

which has been the norm traditionally. These small water conservation units have<br />

made the farmers earn an additional extra income through double cropping. Jalkund truly came<br />

as a blessing for the farmers <strong>of</strong> Chandel who could cultivate a variety <strong>of</strong> vegetable crops after<br />

the harvesting <strong>of</strong> paddy.<br />

Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance<br />

43 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

T1-12P-1011<br />

Effect <strong>of</strong> Hydrogel and Organic Manures to Mitigate Abiotic Stress in<br />

Groundnut Under Rainfed Conditions <strong>of</strong> Saurashtra Region<br />

P. D. Vekariya*, H. R. Vadar, V. D. Vora, K. S. Jotangia and D. S. Hirpara<br />

Main Dry Farming Research Station, Junagadh Agricultural University, Targhadia (Rajkot),<br />

Gujarat, 360 023 India<br />

* pdvekaria@jau.in<br />

India is the second largest producer <strong>of</strong> groundnut in the world and contributes to 19.49 % <strong>of</strong><br />

world’s groundnut production next to China (36.29%). Groundnut is the premier oilseed crop<br />

<strong>of</strong> Gujarat and ranks first in the area and production. In Gujarat, 82 % <strong>of</strong> total areas <strong>of</strong><br />

groundnut fall in the Saurashtra region under rainfed condition and thus exposed to the vagaries<br />

<strong>of</strong> monsoon. Also soils <strong>of</strong> the Saurashtra region are having high clay content and cracking is a<br />

natural phenomenon during stress period. The soil application <strong>of</strong> superabsorbent polymers<br />

(SAPs) is found to be a promising methodology in rainfed areas. One such developed product<br />

is ‘Pusa hydrogel,’ which is the first successful indigenous semi-synthetic superabsorbent<br />

technology for conserving water and enhancing crop productivity and thereby increasing water<br />

use efficiency. This technology could be promising in terms <strong>of</strong> productivity improvement <strong>of</strong><br />

rainfed crops and in combating the moisture stress in agriculture. Hence an experiment was<br />

planned to study the effect <strong>of</strong> hydrogel and organic manures on the productivity and rain water<br />

use efficiency <strong>of</strong> groundnut.<br />

Methodology<br />

The field experiment was conducted during the kharif seasons <strong>of</strong> 2018to 2020at Main Dry<br />

Farming Research Station, Targhadia (Rajkot) under rainfed conditions. The soil <strong>of</strong> the<br />

experimental site was clayey, medium in available nitrogen and phosphorus and high in<br />

available potassium with mildly alkaline and non-saline. The experiment was laid out in<br />

factorial randomized block design with three replications with a gross plot size <strong>of</strong> 5.4 m X 4.8<br />

m and net plot size <strong>of</strong> 3.6 m X 2.4 m. The experiment comprised <strong>of</strong> 9 treatment combinations,<br />

consisting <strong>of</strong> 3 levels <strong>of</strong> hydrogel (0, 2.5 and 5.0 kg ha -1 ) and 3organic manure treatments<br />

(control, FYM @ 10 t ha -1 and vermicompost @ 2 t ha -1 ). The amount <strong>of</strong> hydrogel as per<br />

treatment was mixed with dry and fine sand <strong>of</strong> less than 0.25 mm size in 1:10 ratio, to distribute<br />

uniformly in the furrow. The sand mixed hydrogel was applied in furrow through drilling<br />

before sowing <strong>of</strong> seed. Groundnut (GG-20) was sown with the onset <strong>of</strong> monsoon each year at<br />

the distance <strong>of</strong> 60cmusing seed rate <strong>of</strong> 120 kg ha -1 and applied 12.5 kg N + 25.0 kg P2O5 ha -1 .<br />

The total rainfall received during the crop season (June to October) was 614, 1336 and 1160<br />

mm in 26, 39and 45 rainy days in the year 2018, 2019 and 2020, respectively. Productivity and<br />

rain water use efficiency <strong>of</strong> groundnut and soil moisture content was pooled over three years.<br />

44 | Page Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Economics <strong>of</strong> different treatments was worked out based on pooled results <strong>of</strong> pod and haulm<br />

yield <strong>of</strong> groundnut in terms <strong>of</strong> net returns ha -1 and B:C ratio considering the prevailing market<br />

price <strong>of</strong> produce and cost <strong>of</strong> cultivation.<br />

Results<br />

Based on three years pooled mean pod and haulm yield <strong>of</strong> groundnut and soil moisture content<br />

was affected significantly due to the application <strong>of</strong> hydrogel and organic manures.<br />

Significantly highest pod and haulm yield and soil moisture content was recorded under<br />

application <strong>of</strong> hydrogel @ 2.5 kg ha -1 over control. Among organic manures, application <strong>of</strong><br />

FYM @ 10 t ha -1 was recorded significantly highest pod and haulm yield as well as soil<br />

moisture content as compared to control, but it was remained at par with vermicompost @ 2.0<br />

t ha -1 in respect <strong>of</strong> pod yield and soil moisture content. Maximum rain water use efficiency<br />

(4.28 kg ha -1 mm -1 ) was obtained with application <strong>of</strong> hydrogel@ 2.5 kg ha -1 and FYM @ 10 t<br />

ha -1 as compared to rest <strong>of</strong> treatments under different levels <strong>of</strong> hydrogel and organic manure,<br />

respectively. Similarly, the application <strong>of</strong> hydrogel @ 2.5 kg ha -1 and FYM @ 10 t ha -1 gave<br />

the highest net returns <strong>of</strong> Rs. 82363 ha -1 and 80600 ha -1 with B: C ratio <strong>of</strong> 2.50 and 2.42, as<br />

compared to the rest <strong>of</strong> treatments under different levels <strong>of</strong> hydrogel and organic manure,<br />

respectively.<br />

Productivity, soil moisture content, rain water use efficiency and economics <strong>of</strong> groundnut as<br />

influenced by hydrogel and organic manures under rainfed conditions (pooled mean <strong>of</strong> 3years)<br />

Treatments<br />

Hydrogel levels (kg ha -1 )<br />

Productivity<br />

(kg ha -1 )<br />

Pod<br />

Haulm<br />

Soil<br />

moisture<br />

content<br />

(%)<br />

Rain<br />

water use<br />

efficiency<br />

(kg ha -1 mm -1 )<br />

Net<br />

return<br />

(Rs.<br />

ha -1 )<br />

B:C<br />

Ratio<br />

Control 1919 4809 21.70 3.85 71478 2.36<br />

2.5 2119 5411 23.75 4.28 82363 2.50<br />

5.0 2034 4853 23.76 4.07 72679 2.27<br />

SEm+ 48 141 0.35<br />

CD (P=0.05) 135 402 1.00<br />

Organic manures<br />

Control 1933 4757 22.47 3.86 72928 2.42<br />

FYM @10 t ha -1 2126 5381 23.80 4.28 80600 2.42<br />

Vermicompost @ 2.0 t ha -1 2013 4936 22.93 4.06 72992 2.29<br />

SEm+ 48 141 0.35<br />

CD (P=0.05) 135 402 1.00<br />

Conclusion<br />

Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance<br />

45 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

From the above findings, it could be concluded that application <strong>of</strong> hydrogel @ 2.5 kg ha -1 and<br />

FYM @ 10 t ha -1 was found superior in increasing the productivity, rain water use efficiency<br />

and economics <strong>of</strong> groundnut under rainfed conditions <strong>of</strong> Saurashtra region.<br />

T1-13P-1023<br />

Straw Mulching as Climate Resilience Measure for In-situ Water<br />

Management and Enhancing Productivity <strong>of</strong> Rainfed Soybean<br />

S.H. Narale*, M.S. Pendke, W.N. Narkhede, B.V.Asewar and P.H. Gourkhede<br />

Vasantrao Naik Marathwada Agricultural University, Parbhani (M.S.)<br />

*sskhune2602@gmail.com<br />

Soybean is a major kharif crop grown in Marathwada region <strong>of</strong> Maharashtra under rainfed<br />

condition and is being apreferred crop by the marginal and small rainfed farmers. The region<br />

receives mean annual rainfall <strong>of</strong> 880 mm. Rainfall in uncertain and erratic in this region. The<br />

productivity <strong>of</strong> soybean particularly in Marathwada region is variable due occurrence <strong>of</strong> 3 to 4<br />

dryspells during July to September. The crop productivity decreases with either deficiency <strong>of</strong><br />

rainfall or its distribution or due to moisture stress in critical growth period. Mulching is one<br />

<strong>of</strong> the important practices to conserve rainwater and thereby soil moisture which help sustain<br />

the crop productivity. It was also noted that straw mulching increased soil moisture content in<br />

the maize-wheat cropping system in the north-western regions <strong>of</strong> India, and thus enhanced crop<br />

productivity (Sharma et al. 2010).The study evaluated the effect <strong>of</strong> straw mulching on<br />

productivity and pr<strong>of</strong>itability <strong>of</strong> soybean with in-situ moisture conservation on farmer’s field.<br />

Methodology<br />

Research demonstrations were conducted on farmers’ fields during 2016-17 to 2020-21 under<br />

FLD at village Babhulgoan in Parbhani District in Marathwada region <strong>of</strong> Maharashtra. Most<br />

<strong>of</strong> the farmers were cultivating soybean under rainfed condition and were advocated to apply<br />

straw mulch in inter-row <strong>of</strong> soybean crop for moisture conservation. Demonstration fields were<br />

selected based on the willingness <strong>of</strong> the farmers. The rainfall data was collected from the<br />

nearest rain gauge station. The duration <strong>of</strong> dryspells and number <strong>of</strong> dryspells were recorded<br />

every year. The data on crop yield in both the field i.e. with straw mulch and without straw<br />

mulch were recorded.<br />

Results<br />

The mean annual rainfall <strong>of</strong> the station is 880.9 mm. Out <strong>of</strong> the 5years, above normal rainfall<br />

occurred during 4 years and below normal rainfall was observed in one year. However, the<br />

distribution <strong>of</strong> rainfall was different in every year. Out <strong>of</strong> the 5 years, 3 years i.e. 2017, 2019<br />

and 2020, 4 dryspells were observed every year which has resulted moisture stress during crop<br />

period.<br />

46 | Page Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Results show that yield attributes and yield viz., effective tiller/m 2 (89.3), finger length<br />

(6.38cm), ear weight (6.38g), no <strong>of</strong> grains/ear (938) and grain weight/ear/gram (3.32g) and<br />

1000 grain weight (3.28) were highest in technology option IV i.e. improved varieties (GPU-<br />

282) with (N40P30K20) and transplanting 20 days sold seedling in line sowing (PP10 cm & RR<br />

30cm). The maximum grain yield (23.46 q/ha) and straw yield (59.64 q/ha) were recorded in<br />

technology option IV followed by technology option III, TO-II & I. respectively. High yielding<br />

varieties with line sowing and recommended nutrient management increased the grain yield<br />

with increased nutrient supply on yield attributing the characters like effective tillers/m 2 , finger<br />

length, ear weight, number <strong>of</strong> grain/ear and grain weight/ear. Application <strong>of</strong> recommended<br />

dose <strong>of</strong> nutrients and line sowing facilitate weeding to operate three-time dry land weeder<br />

which lead to increase availability <strong>of</strong> nutrients and improve the soil properties, absorption and<br />

translocation <strong>of</strong> nutrient by crop resulting in increased yield. These results are in line with the<br />

finding <strong>of</strong> AK. Roy et al (2018).<br />

Data indicated that, with application <strong>of</strong> straw mulch, 29.53 per cent mean soil moisture was<br />

recorded during crop growth period as against the soil moisture <strong>of</strong> 24.22 per cent in the<br />

treatment <strong>of</strong> without mulching. Due to application <strong>of</strong> straw mulch, additional moisture <strong>of</strong> 21.92<br />

per cent was conserved. Aulakh and Sur (1999) conducted study on effect <strong>of</strong> mulching on soil<br />

moisture and found that due to mulching, additional soil moisture was conserved.<br />

Intervention<br />

Mean soil moisture during crop growth period<br />

Mean soil moisture (%)<br />

2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 Mean<br />

With mulching 28.64 29.55 29.12 30.36 29.98 29.53<br />

Without mulching 23.54 24.28 24.18 24.95 24.17 24.22<br />

Conclusion<br />

Soybean grain yield was found significantly increase by 16.40 per cent due to application <strong>of</strong><br />

straw mulch. The gross and net monetary returns were found significantly increase by 17.17<br />

and 22.61 per cent respectively, due to application <strong>of</strong> straw mulch. The BC ratio <strong>of</strong> 1.98 was<br />

observed due to application <strong>of</strong> straw mulch as against the BC ratio <strong>of</strong> 1.89 without application<br />

<strong>of</strong> straw mulch. Due to application <strong>of</strong> straw mulch, additional moisture <strong>of</strong> 21.92 per cent was<br />

conserved.<br />

References<br />

Aulakh PS and Sur HS. 1999. Effect <strong>of</strong> mulching on soil temperature, soil moisture, weed<br />

populationgrowth and yield in pomograinate. Prog. Hort. 31: 131-133<br />

Bu LD, Liu JL, Zhu L, Li SQ, Hill RL, Zhao Y. 2013: The effects <strong>of</strong> mulching on maize growth,<br />

yield and water use in a semi-arid region. Agric. Water Manag., 123: 71–78.<br />

Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance<br />

47 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Kumar R, Srivastva BKand Kumar R. 1998. Influence <strong>of</strong> different mulching materials on yield<br />

and quality <strong>of</strong> winter tomato. Proc. National Aca Sci. India Biol Sci 68(3-4): 279- 282<br />

Sekhon NK, Hira GS, Sidhu AS and Thind SS. 2005. Response <strong>of</strong> soybean (Glycine max Mer.)<br />

to wheat straw in different cropping seasons. Soil Use Manag.,21: 422-426<br />

Sharma AR, Singh R, Dhyani SK, Dube RK. 2010: Moisture conservation and nitrogen<br />

recycling through legume mulching in rainfed maize (Zea mays)-wheat<br />

(Triticumaestivum) cropping system. Nutr. Cycling Agroecosyst., 87: 187–197.<br />

T1-14P-1037<br />

Irrigation Requirement <strong>of</strong> Major Crops Under Changing Climatic<br />

Scenarios in Northern Gujarat Zone<br />

R. Rejani*, K.V. Rao, K. Sammi Reddy, D. Kalyan Srinivas, G.R. Chary,<br />

K.A. Gopinath, M. Osman and M. Prabhakar<br />

ICAR-Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, Hyderabad- 500 059, India<br />

*rrejani10@gmail.com<br />

Prolonged dry spells during the critical growth stages <strong>of</strong> the crops affect the rainfed crops,<br />

especially in the arid, semi-arid regions and dry sub-humid zones which in turn results in crop<br />

failure or reduction in yield. In India, the average temperature is predicted to increase by 2 to<br />

4 0 C with changes in the distribution and frequency <strong>of</strong> rainfall, number <strong>of</strong> rainy days and<br />

extreme events. Long term data analysis (1953-2000) indicated that Rajasthan, Gujarat and<br />

Andhra Pradesh are severely affected by drought. Many studies projected the adverse impacts<br />

<strong>of</strong> climate change on India’s water resources, agriculture and other ecosystems and hence<br />

concerted efforts are required for its mitigation and adaptation to reduce the adverse impacts<br />

and make Indian agriculture more resilient. In rainfed areas, the adoption <strong>of</strong> suitable in-situ<br />

interventions and supplemental irrigation are very essential to save the crops from prolonged<br />

dry spells. The selected study area, Northern Gujarat zone also suffers from prolonged dry<br />

spells coinciding with the vegetative and reproductive stages <strong>of</strong> the major rainfed crops and the<br />

adoption <strong>of</strong> suitable interventions are very important. Therefore, adoption <strong>of</strong> suitable in-situ<br />

moisture conservation measures and supplemental irrigation is very important for this area.<br />

Hence the present study was taken up to estimate the irrigation requirement <strong>of</strong> the major crops<br />

spatially and to find its variability over the years and also under changing climatic scenarios.<br />

Methodology<br />

The Northern Gujarat zone includes Ahmedhabad, Banaskantha, Gandhinagar, Mehsana, Patan<br />

and Sabarkantha districts and this region is highly vulnerable to the impact <strong>of</strong> climate change.<br />

This zone is semi-arid with an average annual rainfall <strong>of</strong> 613 mm. Around 94% <strong>of</strong> the rainfall<br />

is contributed by south-west monsoon, 4% by north-west monsoon and the remaining 2% is<br />

48 | Page Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

from summer rains. The normal onset <strong>of</strong> monsoon occurs during third week <strong>of</strong> September and<br />

prolonged dry spells are very common in this region mainly in August and September<br />

coinciding with the vegetative and reproductive stages <strong>of</strong> the major rainfed crops such as<br />

pearlmillet, castor, clusterbean, greengram and cowpea. The texture <strong>of</strong> the soil is sandy to sandy<br />

loam. Even though FAO Penman-Monteith method has been recommended as the sole standard<br />

method for ETo calculation (Allen et al., 1998), based on data availability for future scenarios,<br />

the Hargreaves and Samani (1985) method was used in the present study. The run<strong>of</strong>f was<br />

estimated spatially and temporally for a period <strong>of</strong> 63 years from 1951 to 2013 using IMD data<br />

and also under changing climatic scenarios(2030s) using ENSEMBLE data <strong>of</strong> CMIP 5<br />

corresponding to RCPs 4.5 and 6.0.<br />

Results<br />

Spatial and temporal variation <strong>of</strong> rainfall and irrigation requirement <strong>of</strong> major crops in the<br />

current and climate change scenarios<br />

Long term data from 63 years (1951 to 2013) is analyzed spatially and temporally to find the<br />

variability <strong>of</strong> rainfall patterns. At the Northern Gujarat zone, most <strong>of</strong> the sub-districts have rainfall<br />

ranged from 480 to 860 mm. The spatial and temporal variation in rainfall was analysed during 21<br />

years interval (1951-1971, 1972-1992, and 1993-2013). There was an increase in the number <strong>of</strong><br />

high rainfall blocks. This shows the climate change impacts and there is an increased potential for<br />

rainwater harvesting and its utilization in the region, especially in the high rainfall blocks. Under<br />

climate change scenarios, irrigation requirements <strong>of</strong> major crops such as pearlmillet, castor,<br />

clusterbean, cowpea and green gram are predicted. An increase in the irrigation requirement <strong>of</strong><br />

pearl millet is predicted for all the districts by 2030s compared to the baseline period under RCP<br />

4.5 and 6.0. Other crops have an increase in the irrigation requirementin some areas where as<br />

decrease in other areas by 2030s as in case <strong>of</strong> castor, clusterbean and greengram under both the<br />

scenarios. In case <strong>of</strong> castor and greengram, only a slight increase is noted in some areas and in case<br />

<strong>of</strong> clusterbean, the increase is negligible. Based on the irrigation requirement, water availability in<br />

the region and net pr<strong>of</strong>it from different crops, the optimization models were formulated for<br />

determining the optimal cropping patterns to enhance the farmers' income from the study area under<br />

the current scenario.<br />

Conclusion<br />

In this study, the irrigation requirement <strong>of</strong> major crops was determined using Hargreaves method<br />

and GIS during 1951-2013 and for 2030s using ENSEMBLE data <strong>of</strong> CMIP 5.0. There was an<br />

increase in the number <strong>of</strong> high rainfall blocks. An increase in the irrigation requirement <strong>of</strong> pearl<br />

millet is predicted for all the districts by 2030s under RCP 4.5 and 6.0 compared to baseline period.<br />

Other crops have an increase in the irrigation requirementin some areas whereas decrease in other<br />

areas by 2030s as in case <strong>of</strong> castor, clusterbean and greengram under changing climatic scenarios.<br />

Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance<br />

49 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

The variability in the irrigation demand in the near future will help in the sustainable planning <strong>of</strong><br />

water harvesting structures and its utilization.<br />

References<br />

Allen, R.G., Pereira, L.S., Raes, D and Smith, M., 1998. Crop evapotranspiration- Guidelines for<br />

computing crop water requirements, FAO Irrigation and drainage paper. 56. FAO, Rome,<br />

300(9): D05109.<br />

Hargreaves, G.H. and Samani, Z.A.1985. Reference crop evapotranspiration from temperature.<br />

Applied Engineering in Agriculture. 1(2): 96-99.<br />

T1-15P-1057<br />

Resilience in Rainfed Agriculture through Rainwater Management based<br />

on Catchment-Storage-Command Relationship in Assured Rainfall Zone <strong>of</strong><br />

Marathwada Region<br />

Ananya Mishra 1 , M.S. Pendke 1* , W.N. Narkhede 1 , P.H. Gourkhede 1 , D.P. Waskar 1 and<br />

G. Ravindra Chary 2<br />

1 AICRP on Dryland Agriculture, Vasantrao Naik Marathwada Agricultural University, Parbhani<br />

(M.S.)<br />

2 ICAR-CRIDA Hyderabad 500 059, Telangana<br />

*pendkemadan@gmail.com<br />

Marathwada region is a rainfed area. Though the majority area falls under assured rainfall zone,<br />

it is characterized by 2-3 prolonged dry spells during the crop growth period which resulted in<br />

variations in crop production and productivity. The average productivity <strong>of</strong> all kharif crops<br />

varies depending on monsoon behavior. In the present case study, surface run<strong>of</strong>f was estimated<br />

for the assured rainfall zone <strong>of</strong> Marathwada region for further planning <strong>of</strong> small rainwater<br />

harvesting structures (farm ponds). The importance <strong>of</strong> farm ponds is increasing greatly in recent<br />

years. Farm ponds are the small dugout ponds constructed for rainwater harvesting and thereby<br />

to supply water for supplemental/protective irrigation during dry spells in kharif or in rabi<br />

season for sustaining crop productivity. Farm pond technology is proven as most climate<br />

resilience technology under rainfed region<br />

Methodology<br />

The daily run<strong>of</strong>f for each run<strong>of</strong>f-producing rainfall event was estimated from 2011 to 2021<br />

using SCS curve number method. Considering the available maps <strong>of</strong> land use/ land cover and<br />

hydrological soil group, the area <strong>of</strong> each class <strong>of</strong> land was worked out. Assigning the suitable<br />

curve numbers for respective land use and HSG to each area, the weighted curve number was<br />

determined and used in the estimation <strong>of</strong> run<strong>of</strong>f potential. Based on the run<strong>of</strong>f potential from<br />

the standard catchment area, the fortnightly run<strong>of</strong>f volume was estimated and considering the<br />

50 | Page Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

pan evaporation and seepage rate from the soil strata, the cumulative run<strong>of</strong>f potential to be<br />

harvested in the farm pond was estimated. Accordingly, the sizes <strong>of</strong> farm pond as per catchment<br />

area were worked out.<br />

Result<br />

The hydrologic soil group for the region was observed as ‘D’ with slope range <strong>of</strong> 0.5-3.5 %.<br />

The weighted curve numbers for Parbhani station were calculated as 77, 89 and 95 for AMC I,<br />

II and III respectively. From the rainfall data <strong>of</strong> the last 11 years (2011-2021), the daily surface<br />

run<strong>of</strong>f was estimated and thereby, the yearly run<strong>of</strong>f was calculated. The average run<strong>of</strong>f data<br />

was used for farm pond designs. Data revealed that the average rainfall causing run<strong>of</strong>f was<br />

found to be 853.43 mm which generated mean run<strong>of</strong>f <strong>of</strong> 257 mm i.e. 28.31 per cent.<br />

Year-wise rainfall, run<strong>of</strong>f and % run<strong>of</strong>f<br />

Year Annual rainfall (mm) Rainfall<br />

(mm)<br />

Run<strong>of</strong>f (mm)<br />

% Run<strong>of</strong>f<br />

2011 677.5 636 164 25.78<br />

2012 688.2 678 140 20.64<br />

2013 1217.1 1134.4 345 30.41<br />

2014 560.2 422.7 60 14.19<br />

2015 574.8 414.1 70 16.90<br />

2016 1159.5 1142.1 385 33.70<br />

2017 995.7 987.2 375 37.98<br />

2018 808.1 802.4 304 37.88<br />

2019 968.6 950.8 299 31.44<br />

2020 1098.7 1023.6 376 36.73<br />

2021 1719.3 1196.4 309 25.82<br />

Average 951.60 853.43 257 28.31<br />

Maximum 1719.3 1196.4 385 37.98<br />

Run<strong>of</strong>f<br />

500<br />

400<br />

300<br />

200<br />

Rainfall-run<strong>of</strong>f relation-Parbhani<br />

y = 0.4043x - 88.882<br />

R² = 0.8687<br />

100<br />

0<br />

0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400<br />

Rainfall<br />

Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance<br />

51 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Satheesh Kumar et.al. (2017), used rainfall-run<strong>of</strong>f modelling using SCS-CN method and<br />

similar results were obtained from the current study. The rainfall run<strong>of</strong>f relationship was<br />

worked out for further planning <strong>of</strong> small rainwater harvesting structures like farm ponds. The<br />

run<strong>of</strong>f potential is found to be 28.31 % <strong>of</strong> the rainfall indicating a good scope for rainwater<br />

harvesting and thereby, many more rainwater harvesting structures can be constructed based<br />

on site-specific conditions. A relation between rainfall and run<strong>of</strong>f for was worked out as Y =<br />

0.4043X – 88.882 (R 2 value - 0.8687). The linear rainfall-run<strong>of</strong>f relation obtained can be used<br />

for finding out run<strong>of</strong>f corresponding to any rainfall occurring in the area. Based on rainfallrun<strong>of</strong>f<br />

relationship and catchment–storage relationship and also looking to the climatic<br />

variations particularly rainfall intensity, duration and frequency in the last decade, the farm<br />

pond sizes for assured rainfall zone <strong>of</strong> Marathwada region were redesigned and standardized<br />

for further implementation <strong>of</strong> farm pond programme in the region. The details <strong>of</strong> farm pond<br />

sizes, storage capacity, the area under protective / supplemental irrigation and area under pond<br />

construction is presented as follows.<br />

Catchment<br />

area<br />

(ha)<br />

Farm pond sizes for assured rainfall zone <strong>of</strong> Marathwada region<br />

Top<br />

size <strong>of</strong><br />

pond<br />

(m x<br />

m)<br />

Bottom<br />

size <strong>of</strong><br />

pond<br />

(m x m)<br />

Side<br />

slope<br />

Depth<br />

<strong>of</strong><br />

pond<br />

(m)<br />

Capacity Area<br />

<strong>of</strong> pond under<br />

(m 3 ) irrigation<br />

(ha)<br />

Area<br />

irrigated<br />

%<br />

%<br />

catchment<br />

area under<br />

pond<br />

1.0 21 x 21 12 x 12 1.5 : 1 3 837 1.3 130 4.41<br />

2.0 27 x 27 18 x 18 1.5 : 1 3 1539 2.40 120 7.29<br />

3.0 33 x 33 24 x 24 1.5 : 1 3 2457 3.93 131 10.89<br />

Thus, rainwater harvesting based on catchment- storage relationship created an assured source<br />

<strong>of</strong> water for providing protective irrigation, particularly during dry spell periods for sustaining<br />

crop productivity to create resilience in rainfed agriculture.<br />

Conclusion<br />

Rainwater harvesting appears to be one <strong>of</strong> the most promising alternatives for the escalating<br />

demand for fresh water for rainfed agriculture. Rainfall-run<strong>of</strong>f relationship proved to be the<br />

most valuable information for the identification <strong>of</strong> run<strong>of</strong>f potential at any station. The run<strong>of</strong>f<br />

potential is found to be 28.31 %, indicating a good scope for rainwater harvesting. Farm pond<br />

sizes were standardized for recommendation to State Department <strong>of</strong> Agriculture for further<br />

implementation <strong>of</strong> farm pond programme in the region /state.<br />

52 | Page Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

References<br />

Satheesh Kumar, S., Venkateswaran, S and Kannan, R. 2017. Rainfall–run<strong>of</strong>f estimation using<br />

SCS–CN and GIS approach in the Pappiredipatti watershed <strong>of</strong> the Vaniyar sub basin,<br />

South India. Modeling Earth Sys. Environ., 3(1):24.<br />

T1-16P-1070<br />

Nutrient Uptake, Harvest Index and Economics <strong>of</strong> Wheat Varieties as<br />

Influenced by Alternate Furrow Irrigation<br />

Jyoti, Parveen Kumar*, Pawan Kumar and S.K. Thakral<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Agronomy, CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar, Haryana, India<br />

*kumar10@hau.ac.in<br />

Wheat productivity is determined by better cultivars combined with efficient production<br />

methods. The most essential component in fulfilling a variety's production potential is its<br />

suitability to a certain agro-climate and crop production practices, particularly nitrogen and<br />

irrigation application. The lower dose <strong>of</strong> nitrogen results in poor yield while higher dose <strong>of</strong><br />

nitrogen causes environmental pollution and increases cultivation cost. Therefore, nitrogen<br />

should be applied in sufficient quantities through organic and inorganic sources is essential.<br />

Nitrogen loss and NO3-N contamination <strong>of</strong> surface and subsurface water can be resulted from<br />

flood irrigation with traditional flat planting and excessive nitrogen application (Akele; 2019).<br />

Alternate furrow irrigation (AFI) is a water-saving technique that is both affordable and simple<br />

to deploy. When compared to traditional furrow irrigation, AFI can reduce the irrigation water<br />

use by 40 per cent without reducing yield, resulting in increased water use efficiency (Cao et<br />

al. 2010).<br />

Methodology<br />

Field experiment was conducted during rabi season <strong>of</strong> 2021-22 at Agronomy Research Farm<br />

<strong>of</strong> the C.C.S. Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar, Haryana, India. The soil <strong>of</strong> the<br />

experimental site was sandy loam in texture, slightly alkaline in reaction, low in organic carbon<br />

and available nitrogen, medium in available phosphorus and high in available potassium. The<br />

experiment was carried out in split plot design with sixteen treatment combinations replicated<br />

thrice. The four varieties (WH 1105, HD 3086, HD 2967 and WH 1184) were assisted in main<br />

plot and nitrogen sources viz. control, 100% RDN through urea, 50% RDN through urea + 50%<br />

RDN through VC and 50% RDN through urea + 25% RDN through VC + 25% RDN through<br />

FYM in sub plots. The pre-sowing irrigation was applied through canal water and the<br />

subsequent two irrigations were applied in alternate furrow at CRI and flowering stage through<br />

an open channel using parshall flume. Furrows subjected to irrigation were open-ended;<br />

however, water does not exceed the edge <strong>of</strong> the plot, whereas other furrows not subjected to<br />

Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance<br />

53 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

irrigation were closed-ended. The rainfall received during the crop season was 71 mm. The<br />

nutrient uptake, harvest index and economics were calculated by using the standard formula.<br />

Results<br />

Nutrient uptake: Among varieties, significantly higher nutrient uptake (N, P and K) was<br />

recorded with the variety HD3086 over HD2967, however, it was statistically at par with<br />

variety WH 1184 in respect <strong>of</strong> N and K uptake and with WH 1105 and WH 1184 in respect <strong>of</strong><br />

phosphorous uptake in grain. Similarly, significantly, higher nutrient uptake (N, P and K0 in<br />

straw was found in variety HD3086 over variety WH 1105, HD 2967 and WH 1184. Among<br />

nitrogen sources, significantly higher nutrient uptake in straw was found with the application<br />

<strong>of</strong> 50% RDN through urea + 25% through VC + 25% FYM over other control, 100% RDN<br />

through urea and 50% RDN through urea + 50% through VC. Similar, trend was observed in<br />

respect <strong>of</strong> nutrient uptake by straw.<br />

Harvest index: Among varieties, significantly higher harvest index was registered with HD<br />

2967, which did not differ significantly with WH 1105 and WH 1184.Among nitrogen sources,<br />

100 per cent RDN through urea resulted in significantly higher harvest index but it did not<br />

differ with 50 per cent RDN through urea + 25 per cent RDN through VC + 25 per cent RDN<br />

through FYM and 50 per cent RDN through urea + 50 per cent RDN through VC.<br />

Benefit: cost ratio: The highest net pr<strong>of</strong>itability in terms <strong>of</strong> benefit cost ratio was obtained<br />

under HD 3086 with the application <strong>of</strong> 100 per cent RDN through urea followed by 50 per cent<br />

RDN through organic + 50 per cent RDN through VC.<br />

Effect <strong>of</strong> varieties and nitrogen sources on nutrient uptake, harvest index and<br />

economics <strong>of</strong> wheat under alternate furrow irrigation method<br />

Treatments Nutrient uptake (kg ha -1 ) Harvest<br />

Grain<br />

Straw<br />

index<br />

(%)<br />

N P K N P K<br />

Varieties<br />

WH 1105 52.8 7.4 8.3 52.1 7.8 67.2 37.5 1.2<br />

HD 3086 56.6 7.8 9.0 62.7 8.9 78.2 35.1 1.3<br />

HD 2967 48.2 6.7 7.7 44.9 7.0 58.3 39.1 1.1<br />

WH 1184 53.8 7.6 8.5 55.4 8.2 71.8 36.4 1.2<br />

CD 3.7 0.5 0.5 4.4 0.6 2.6 1.5 -<br />

Nitrogen sources<br />

Control 30.0 2.9 4.8 29.2 3.2 47.0 35.2 1.0<br />

100% RDN through urea 53.5 7.8 8.8 48.9 7.9 65.4 39.1 1.4<br />

50% RDN through urea + 50% through<br />

VC<br />

61.4 9.0 9.6 59.5 9.6 77.6 37.6<br />

B:C<br />

1.3<br />

54 | Page Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

50% RDN through urea + 25% through<br />

VC + 25% FYM<br />

66.6 9.9 10.3 77.4 11.1 85.7 36.2<br />

CD 3.8 0.6 0.7 4.1 0.6 2.4 2.0 -<br />

References<br />

Akele, Z. (2019). Evaluation <strong>of</strong> alternate, fixed and conventional furrow irrigation systems with<br />

different water application level on onion yield in Dubti. Afar, Ethiopia, 9(5)<br />

Cao, Q., Wang, S. Z., Gao, L. H., Ren, H. Z., Chen, Q. Y., Zhao, J. W., Wang, Q., Sui, X. L.<br />

and Zhang, Z. X. (2010). Effect <strong>of</strong> alternative furrow irrigation on growth and water use <strong>of</strong><br />

cucumber in solar greenhouse. Transactions <strong>of</strong> the Chinese Society <strong>of</strong> Agricultural<br />

Engineering, 26(1): 47-53 [in Chinese with English abstract].<br />

1.1<br />

T1-17P-1078<br />

Comparison <strong>of</strong> sustainable dryland cropping under Reduced Run<strong>of</strong>f<br />

Farming in Alfisols <strong>of</strong> Karnataka<br />

Santosh Nagappa Ningoji, M.N. Thimmegowda, Mudalagiriyappa, B.G. Vasanthi and<br />

H.S. Shivaramu<br />

All India Co-ordinated Research Project for Dryland Agriculture, UAS, GKVK, Bengaluru<br />

India is an agrarian country, where rainfed agriculture accounts for two-thirds <strong>of</strong> the total<br />

cropped area (66 %) and contributes 40 per cent to the national food basket. The mean annual<br />

rainfall in rainfed region ranging from 400 mm to 1000 mm, which is uncertain, erratic and<br />

unevenly distributed. Among 400 M ha-m <strong>of</strong> rainfall received, 150 M ha-m flows as surface<br />

run<strong>of</strong>f, subsurface run<strong>of</strong>f and will not available to any type <strong>of</strong> production in India. To mitigate<br />

the run<strong>of</strong>f caused by uneven, erratic and heavy rains, in-situ and ex-situ water harvesting<br />

techniques can be used efficiently. During the rainy season when water is not required for<br />

irrigation, the excess water can be stored in a ancillary reservoir or farm ponds and used<br />

effectively during crucial periods <strong>of</strong> crop growth (Ramachandrappa et al., 2017). The in-situ<br />

water harvesting can be attained through selection <strong>of</strong> proper cropping systems. In this regard,<br />

the predominant crops and cropping systems <strong>of</strong> Eastern dry zone <strong>of</strong> Karnataka were selected<br />

to standardize the efficient cropping system to reduce the run<strong>of</strong>f, soil loss and nutrients loss.<br />

Along with cropping systems the harvested water in farm pond is used as protective irrigation<br />

during dry spells to the know effect on yield and yield parameters <strong>of</strong> different cropping systems.<br />

Methodology<br />

Experiment was carried out to study ‘Comparison <strong>of</strong> sustainable dryland cropping under<br />

Reduced Run<strong>of</strong>f Farming in Alfisols <strong>of</strong> Karnataka’ at the All-India Co-ordinated Research<br />

Project on Dry Land Agriculture, University <strong>of</strong> Agricultural Sciences, GKVK, Bengaluru in<br />

Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance<br />

55 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

the Eastern Dry Zone <strong>of</strong> Karnataka during 2019-20 and 2020-21. The experiment was<br />

conducted using RCBD design with factorial concept with two factors viz., Cropping system<br />

for harvesting <strong>of</strong> run<strong>of</strong>f water from the micro watershed in farm ponds’ consist <strong>of</strong> cropping<br />

system viz., T1 : French bean sole (Arka Arjun), T2 : Finger millet sole(MR-1), T3 : Pigeonpea<br />

(BRG-5)+ field bean (1:1) (HA-4), T 4 : Finger millet (MR-1) + Pigeonpea (8:2), T 5: Perennial<br />

mixed fruit (Pomelo + Guava) orchard and Kitchen garden (Ladies finger, capsicum, tomato,<br />

french bean, brinjal, leafy vegetables, green chilli, knol khol, cluster bean, ridge guard,<br />

cabbage) and ‘Water productivity enhancement strategies’ consist <strong>of</strong> I 1 : Protective advanced<br />

irrigation (sensor based micro irrigation during dry spell) and I2 : Control.<br />

Results<br />

The results revealed that significantly higher grain/ pod yield was recorded with application <strong>of</strong><br />

one sensor based micro irrigation during dry spell in french bean (10097 kg ha -1 ), finger millet<br />

(4126 kg ha -1 ), pigeonpea (887 kg ha -1 ) & field bean (3258 kg ha -1 ) in pigeonpea + field bean<br />

(1:1) cropping system, finger millet (3768 kg ha -1 ) & pigeonpea (166 kg ha -1 ) in finger millet+<br />

pigeonpea (8:2) cropping system, pumelo fruit yield (15429 kg ha -1 ) as compared to their<br />

respective control. The kitchen garden recorded a total <strong>of</strong> 9982 kg ha -1 yield from various crops<br />

grown during the study in kitchen garden. The results are in line with Bhandarkar and Reddy<br />

(2010), where they noticed two-fold increase in yield <strong>of</strong> soybean, chickpea, rice and wheat with<br />

application <strong>of</strong> protective irrigation from farm pond. Similarly, application <strong>of</strong> one irrigation<br />

during dry spell also increased stover/straw yield <strong>of</strong> cropping system as compared to their<br />

respective control. Among different cropping systems french bean with one protective<br />

irrigation has recorded higher finger millet equivalent yield (9627 kg ha -1 ) as compared to other<br />

cropping systems and it was followed by pigeonpea + field bean (1:1) cropping system (5624<br />

kg ha -1 ). Rain water use efficiency and total water use efficiency were also higher with<br />

application <strong>of</strong> one protective irrigation at dry spell as compared to their control. The increased<br />

yield resulted in higher rain water use efficiency and total rain water use efficiency as compared<br />

to control.<br />

Conclusion<br />

It can be concluded from two years <strong>of</strong> experiment that application <strong>of</strong> sensor based micro<br />

irrigation during dry spell by using run<strong>of</strong>f water stored in the farm pond has resulted in higher<br />

yield in french bean (24.46 %), finger millet (21.17 %), pigeonpea (25.45 %) & field bean (37.4<br />

%) in pigeonpea + field bean (1:1) cropping system, finger millet (25.39 %) & pigeonpea (36.06<br />

%) in finger millet + pigeonpea (8:2) cropping system, pumelo fruit yield (21.37 %).<br />

References<br />

Bhandarkar, D. M. and Reddy, K. S., 2010, Water harvesting and recycling technology for<br />

sustainable agriculture in vertisols with high rainfall in National Workshop cum Brain<br />

56 | Page Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Storming on Rainwater harvesting and reuse through farm ponds, CRIDA, Hyderabad.<br />

India, April 21-22, 2009, pp. 276 – 289.<br />

Oweis, T., 1997, Supplemental irrigation: A highly efficient water-use practice. ICARDA,<br />

Aleppo, Syria, pp. 16.<br />

Ramachandrappa, B. K., Thimmegowda, M. N., Anitha, M., Srikanth Babu, P. N., Devaraja,<br />

K., Gopinath, K. A., Srinivasa Rao, C. H. And Ravindrachary, G., 2017, Efficient<br />

rainwater harvesting and its diversified utilization in Alfisols <strong>of</strong> Eastern Dry Zone <strong>of</strong><br />

Karnataka. Indian j. dryland agric. res. dev. 32 (2): 83 - 90.<br />

Yield and yield parameters as influenced by water productivity enhancement strategies<br />

Treatments<br />

T 1: French bean sole*<br />

in different cropping systems under reduced run<strong>of</strong>f farming<br />

Grain or<br />

pod yield<br />

(kg ha -1 )<br />

Stover or<br />

straw yield<br />

(kg ha -1 )<br />

Harv<br />

est<br />

index<br />

Number <strong>of</strong><br />

ears or<br />

pods/plant<br />

Length <strong>of</strong><br />

ears or<br />

pods<br />

(cm)<br />

Weight <strong>of</strong><br />

pods or<br />

grains<br />

(g)/plant<br />

T 1I 1: French bean 10097 3967 0.72 41.8 15.83 112.34<br />

T 1I 2: French bean 8112 3380 0.71 35.99 14.05 93.49<br />

‘t’ test @ 5% S S NS S S S<br />

T 2: Finger millet sole**<br />

T 2I 1: Finger millet 4126 5182 0.44 7.8 8.83 17.71<br />

T 2I 2: Finger millet 3405 4479 0.43 6.37 7.99 14.81<br />

‘t’ test @ 5% S S NS S S S<br />

T 3: Pigeonpea** + field bean* (1:1)<br />

T 3I 1: Pigeonpea 887 3521 0.2 193.07 5.87 81.24<br />

T 3I 2: Pigeonpea 707 2959 0.19 154.42 5.77 60.49<br />

‘t’ test @ 5% S S NS S S S<br />

T 3I 1: Field bean 3258 3927 0.46 31.27 6.73 49.35<br />

T 3I 2: Field bean 2370 3423 0.42 23.77 6.45 41.57<br />

‘t’ test @ 5% S S NS S S S<br />

T 4: Finger millet**+ pigeonpea**(8:2)<br />

T 4I 1: Finger millet 3768 4747 0.44 7.99 8.42 17.1<br />

T 4I 2: Finger millet 3005 4109 0.42 6.55 7.59 13.88<br />

‘t’ test @ 5% S S NS S S S<br />

T 4I 1: Pigeonpea** 166 645 0.21 74.72 5.71 41.13<br />

T 4I 2: Pigeonpea** 122 581 0.17 68.1 5.64 32.31<br />

‘t’ test @ 5% S S NS S S S<br />

T 5: Pomelo<br />

T 5I 1: Pomelo 15429<br />

Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance<br />

57 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

T 5I 2: Pomelo 12712<br />

‘t’ test @ 5% S<br />

Water productivity enhancement strategies<br />

I 1: Sensor based micro irrigation during dry spell<br />

Note: * Pod yield per ha ** Grain yield per ha<br />

I 2: Control<br />

S- Significant; NS- Not Significant<br />

T1-18P-1083<br />

Conservation Furrow-A Low-Cost Climate Resilient Technology to<br />

Enhance the Productivity <strong>of</strong> Rainfed Crops and Cropping Systems in<br />

Scarce Rainfall Zone <strong>of</strong> Andhra Pradesh<br />

A. Malliswara Reddy 1 , B. Sahadeva Reddy 1 , C. Radhakumari 1 , B. Ravindranatha<br />

Reddy 1 , R. Veeraraghavaiah 1 , G. Ravindrachary 2 and K.A. Gopinath 2<br />

1 Agricultural Research Station, Ananthapuramu-515 001, Andhra Pradesh, India.<br />

2<br />

ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad-500 059, India<br />

Among various extreme climatic events, <strong>of</strong> which drought (moisture stress) is one <strong>of</strong> the most<br />

important abiotic stresses which influence the rainfed crops productivity. In India, moisture<br />

stress is a recurring chronic problem, which has a sizeable proportion <strong>of</strong> area falling in arid and<br />

semi-arid tropics. Two-thirds <strong>of</strong> India’s agricultural land is vulnerable to moisture stress <strong>of</strong><br />

various intensities, and the probability <strong>of</strong> occurrence <strong>of</strong> moisture stress is over 35 per cent. The<br />

intra-seasonal dryspells due to erratic distribution <strong>of</strong> rainfall coupled with crop season<br />

significantly influenced the productivity <strong>of</strong> rainfed crops. Adequate moisture is essential during<br />

key developmental stages and even short periods <strong>of</strong> moisture stress during these stages can<br />

cause significant loss in yield <strong>of</strong> rainfed crops. Efficient management <strong>of</strong> a dry spells with a<br />

suitable rainwater management practice is desired for different crops under rainfed agriculture.<br />

The conservation furrow is a simple and low cost in situ rain water conservation practice<br />

adopted in alfisols and associated soils with problems <strong>of</strong> crusting and sealing for rainfed areas<br />

(400-900 mm rainfall) with moderate slope varying from 1 to 4 %. Furrows at 3-5 m apart on<br />

contour or across slope are opened either during planting or during intercultural operation using<br />

a country plough in this system. These furrows harvest the local run<strong>of</strong>f water and improve soil<br />

moisture in the adjoining crop rows, particularly during the period <strong>of</strong> water stress. This practice<br />

has been found to increase the crop yields by 10-25% (Venkateswarlu et al., 2016). Hence, the<br />

present study was conducted to identify the most suitable and efficient low-cost climate<br />

resilient technology to enhance the productivity in predominant rainfed crops and cropping<br />

systems under scarcity zone <strong>of</strong> Andhra Pradesh.<br />

58 | Page Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Methodology<br />

On-farm demonstrations were conducted at farmers’ fields during 2017-2021 under the project<br />

entitled “National Innovations in Climate Resilient Agriculture (NICRA)”, which is an<br />

operational area at Vannedoddi village <strong>of</strong> Gooty mandal, Ananthapuramu district <strong>of</strong> Andhra<br />

Pradesh, which is geographically situated in between 15 0 08 ’ N latitude and 77 0 40 ’ E longitude.<br />

The predominant soils in this region are red sandy loam in texture with near neutral in reaction,<br />

low in organic carbon and available nitrogen, medium in available phosphorus and potassium.<br />

Demonstration fields were selected based on the willingness <strong>of</strong> the farmers to implement<br />

participatory research to evaluate the science-based approach. The selected farmers in the<br />

village participated in every intervention like soil sampling, input application and growth and<br />

yield estimation. At the demonstration site, the normal rainfall was 595.6 mm. Out <strong>of</strong> five years<br />

study (2017-2021), 2018 is rain deficit year in which 44 per cent deficit rainfall was recorded.<br />

Three years i.e. 2019, 2020 and 2021 were rainy excess years in which 29, 95 and 61 per cent<br />

excess rainfall was recorded respectively. The rainfall during 2017 was found normal. The<br />

variations in rainfall patterns clearly showed that rainfall vulnerability. During the above study<br />

period (2017-2021), the dryspells were recorded at different phenophases <strong>of</strong> crop growth period<br />

in rainfed crops. During the study period, 2 to 4 dryspells occurred with 11 to 67 consecutive<br />

rainless days was noticed. To overcome this dryspells, the climate resilient technologies like<br />

in-situ moisture conservation through formation <strong>of</strong> conservation furrows at every crop row in<br />

sole castor and pigeonpea + pearlmillet (1:1) intercropping system were conducted on farmer<br />

fields as participatory approach during 2017-2021.<br />

Results<br />

The five years data indicated that higher seed yield, net monetary returns, benefit-cost ratio and<br />

rainwater use efficiency were recorded with formation <strong>of</strong> conservation furrow at every crop<br />

row compared to control (without conservation furrow). Mean data revealed that, the seed yield<br />

<strong>of</strong> castor was increased by16.3% and additional net returns <strong>of</strong> Rs.4331ha -1 was realized with<br />

the formation <strong>of</strong> conservation furrows compared to control. This might be due to conservation<br />

furrows helps to conserve more rainwater in the root zone, which in turn beneficial to cope up<br />

with mid-season drought in castor.<br />

Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance<br />

59 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Effect <strong>of</strong> conservation furrows on castor productivity, economics and rainwater use<br />

efficiency<br />

Year Intervention<br />

Seed<br />

yield<br />

(kg ha -1 )<br />

% Yield<br />

increase<br />

over<br />

control<br />

NMR<br />

(Rs. ha -1 )<br />

B:C<br />

Ratio<br />

RWUE<br />

(kg ha -1<br />

mm -1 )<br />

2017 Formation <strong>of</strong> conservation furrows 745 14.2 18920 1.95 1.50<br />

Control (without conservation<br />

furrows)<br />

652 -- 13780 1.52 1.24<br />

2018 Formation <strong>of</strong> conservation furrows 437 18.4 -892 0.94 0.65<br />

Control (without conservation<br />

furrows)<br />

369 -- -3204 0.79 0.55<br />

2019 Formation <strong>of</strong> conservation furrows 666 21.1 16884 2.07 1.79<br />

Control (without conservation<br />

furrows)<br />

550 -- 11200 1.71 1.48<br />

2020 Formation <strong>of</strong> conservation furrows 875 16.7 17500 2.00 1.36<br />

Control (without conservation<br />

furrows)<br />

750 -- 13750 1.85 1.17<br />

2021 Formation <strong>of</strong> conservation furrows 1034 11.2 34200 2.95 1.76<br />

Control (without conservation<br />

furrows)<br />

930 -- 31450 2.76 1.62<br />

Effect <strong>of</strong> conservation furrows on productivity and economics <strong>of</strong> intercropping system<br />

Year Intervention<br />

2017 Formation <strong>of</strong> conservation<br />

furrows<br />

Control (without conservation<br />

furrows)<br />

2018 Formation <strong>of</strong> conservation<br />

furrows<br />

Control (without conservation<br />

furrows)<br />

2019 Formation <strong>of</strong> conservation<br />

furrows<br />

Control (without conservation<br />

furrows)<br />

2020 Formation <strong>of</strong> conservation<br />

furrows<br />

Control (without conservation<br />

furrows)<br />

2021 Formation <strong>of</strong> conservation<br />

furrows<br />

Control (without conservation<br />

furrows)<br />

Pigeonpea<br />

equivalent<br />

yield<br />

(kg ha -1 )<br />

% yield<br />

increase<br />

over<br />

control<br />

NMR<br />

(Rs. ha -1 )<br />

B:C<br />

Ratio<br />

RWUE (kg<br />

ha -1 mm -1 )<br />

1392 14.5 24,688 2.97 1.26<br />

1216 -- 22,359 2.74 1.13<br />

192 20.8 -1998 0.84 0.72<br />

159 -- -2846 0.70 0.60<br />

546 16.9 15302 1.94 0.82<br />

467 -- 10836 1.66 0.70<br />

975 19.5 30,050 2.13 1.57<br />

816 -- 22,227 1.88 1.32<br />

488 14.8 2,460 1.09 0.85<br />

425 -- 510 1.01 0.73<br />

60 | Page Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Similarly, formation <strong>of</strong> conservation furrows influenced the yield and economics <strong>of</strong><br />

pigeonpea+pearlmillet (1:1) intercropping system. The data revealed that the higher pigeonpea<br />

equivalent yield, net returns, B:C ratio and rainwater use efficiency were recoded with<br />

formation <strong>of</strong> conservation furrows compared to without conservation furrows. The pigeonpea<br />

equivalent yield was increased by17.3% and realized additional monetary net returns <strong>of</strong> Rs.<br />

53086 ha -1 with formation <strong>of</strong> conservation furrows compared to control. Conservation furrows<br />

act as mini reservoirs through harvesting the local surface run<strong>of</strong>f water and improves soil<br />

moisture in the adjoining crop rows, particularly during the period <strong>of</strong> water stress<br />

(Venkateswarlu et al., 2016).<br />

Conclusion<br />

Conservation furrows enhanced the seed yield, economics and rainwater use efficiency in<br />

castor and pigeonpea + pearlmillet (1:1) intercropping system. Hence, formation <strong>of</strong><br />

conservation furrows are low cost climate resilient technology to cope mid-season drought in<br />

rainfed crops under scarcity zone <strong>of</strong> Andhra Pradesh.<br />

References<br />

Venkateswarlu, B., Chary, G. R., Singh, G and Shivay, Y. S. 2016. Climate Resilient<br />

Agronomy. The Indian Society <strong>of</strong> Agronomy, New Delhi.120-142.<br />

Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance<br />

T1-19P-1129<br />

Conservation and Rainwater Storage Structure (CNB) on Drainage Line<br />

for Developing Groundwater Regimes in Vidarbha Region<br />

R. S. Patode, Ranee Wankhade, V. P. Pandagale, V. V. Gabhane, M. M. Ganvir,<br />

A. B. Chorey and R. S. Mali<br />

All India Coordinated Research Project for Dryland Agriculture, Dr. Panjabrao Deshmukh Krishi<br />

Vidyapeeth, Akola (M.S.), India<br />

Groundwater resources appraisal in various areas <strong>of</strong> the country is must for the integrated<br />

management and development <strong>of</strong> water resources. A wide spatial-temporal change in the<br />

amount <strong>of</strong> groundwater resources warrants systematic exploration to place most excellent open<br />

wells and bore well location for tapping this important natural resource. The water conditions<br />

for agriculture, municipal and industries are responsible for increase than the yearly<br />

groundwater recharge and it was observed that during last decades every country will be facing<br />

scanty rainfall, thus day by day decreases groundwater table. On the other hand, nonstop<br />

exploration from groundwater reservoir in surplus <strong>of</strong> replenishable groundwater recharge may<br />

direct effect in lowering <strong>of</strong> groundwater table, agricultural production and also human<br />

organism (Khadri and Pande, 2016). The further insufficiency <strong>of</strong> water for various agricultural<br />

production systems should be overcome by using efficient soil and water conservation and<br />

61 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

management practices. Moreover, the strategy decisions on water management are more<br />

essential for groundwater resource management and also for impact assessment on<br />

groundwater regime with efficient method at any country level. Groundwater resources<br />

evaluation in many areas <strong>of</strong> the Vidarbha region is important for the developmental strategies<br />

<strong>of</strong> integrated watershed development and management.<br />

Methodology<br />

The study was undertaken under Agri-CRP on Water project (Funded by ICAR-IIWM,<br />

Bhubaneswar) to analyze the impact <strong>of</strong> rainwater harvesting structure on groundwater seasonal<br />

fluctuations at Kajaleshwar-Warkhed watershed Tq. Barshitakli, Distt. Akola in Maharashtra.<br />

The work <strong>of</strong> Nala widening/deepening and repairs <strong>of</strong> rainwater harvesting structure was done<br />

for quantification <strong>of</strong> groundwater recharge and agricultural development in the dryland area in<br />

the watershed. Groundwater level data has been collected from 51 observation wells for<br />

analysis <strong>of</strong> rainwater harvesting impact on groundwater regime in watershed area.<br />

Groundwater levels data were monitored for groundwater analysis with the help <strong>of</strong> GIS<br />

s<strong>of</strong>tware. Groundwater fluctuation maps have been generated from interpolation techniques in<br />

Arc GIS 10.3 s<strong>of</strong>tware. The beneficiaries/ farmers in the vicinity <strong>of</strong> this drainage line were<br />

selected for crop planning and uses <strong>of</strong> harvested water through micro-irrigation system. The<br />

wells located surrounding these drains were surveyed and monitored for groundwater levels.<br />

Results<br />

The rainwater harvesting activity is more essential for agricultural development. Groundwater<br />

level fluctuation analysis is mainly depending on the variation <strong>of</strong> water level data during postmonsoon<br />

periods which can be directly related to recharge and discharge <strong>of</strong> groundwater<br />

regime. Groundwater level data has been collected from 51 observation wells in the vicinity <strong>of</strong><br />

10 CNBs for analysis <strong>of</strong> rainwater harvesting impact on groundwater regime in watershed area.<br />

It was observed that, during 2019 (51 wells) average depth <strong>of</strong> water level was 2.81 m and<br />

during 2020 (51wells) average depth <strong>of</strong> water level was 2.17. The groundwater level<br />

fluctuations in 2020 as compared to 2019 were observed. The well water levels were observed<br />

to be increased in 2020 as compared to 2019 for maximum wells. The average depth in the<br />

wells in 2020 was increased by 0.64m with respect to the levels in 2019 and by 4.08 m as<br />

compared to the well levels during 2016 (Patode et al., 2016). This is due to the storage <strong>of</strong><br />

rainwater in the widened and deepened nala for longer duration. It was also possible to utilize<br />

the recharged water for protective irrigations to different crops.<br />

Increase in yield during kharif and rabi season<br />

Increase in the ground water levels in wells and availability <strong>of</strong> water in the wells as well as<br />

CNBs benefited to farmers to take other crops like turmeric, onion, cabbage, brinjal and chilly<br />

other than soybean and chickpea. One protective irrigation during the dry spell from stored<br />

62 | Page Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

water and also groundwater used for soybean demonstration plots have resulted in significant<br />

increase in yield as compared to rainfed condition or without irrigation at the Warkhed-<br />

Kajaleshwar watershed. It was observed that the average yield <strong>of</strong> soybean with one protective<br />

irrigation was increased in the range <strong>of</strong> 16.00 % to 33.00 % over without irrigation. During<br />

rabi season for chickpea the stored rainwater was used for protective irrigation. It was observed<br />

that the average yield <strong>of</strong> chickpea with one protective irrigation was increased in the range <strong>of</strong><br />

16.92 % to 29.52 % over without irrigation. Similarly, the average yield with two protective<br />

irrigations was increased in the range <strong>of</strong> 30.18 % to 52.00 % over without irrigation.<br />

Conclusion<br />

It can be inferred that due to storage <strong>of</strong> water for longer time in the drainage line (Nallas,<br />

CNBs), the well recharge took place resulting into increase <strong>of</strong> ground water table. Thus,<br />

sufficient water will be available for providing protective irrigations to different crops. The<br />

farmers were able to raise different crops thereby having more income generation compared to<br />

earlier situation. Crop diversification and sustainability in agriculture occurred. Based on these<br />

results it can be recommended to undertake the deepening and widening <strong>of</strong> existing drainage<br />

line network along with construction or repairing <strong>of</strong> the permanent structures and reuse <strong>of</strong><br />

harvested water through micro-irrigation in the entire Vidarbha region <strong>of</strong> Maharashtra for<br />

sustainable crop production and water resources development.<br />

References<br />

Khadri, S.F.R. and Chaitanya Pande. 2016. GIS based analysis <strong>of</strong> groundwater variation in<br />

Mahesh River Basin, Akola and Buldhana Districts, Maharashtra, India. Int.J. Pure<br />

and Applied Res. Engrg. Technol., 4 (9):127-136.<br />

Patode RS, Nagdeve MB and Pande CB. 2016. Groundwater level monitoring <strong>of</strong> Kajaleshwar-<br />

Warkhed watershed, Tq. Barshitakli, Dist. Akola, India through GIS Approach.<br />

Adv.in Life Sci., 5(24), 11207-11210.<br />

Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance<br />

T1-20P-1144<br />

Effect <strong>of</strong> Irrigation and Nitrogen Sources on Yield and Water Use<br />

Efficiency <strong>of</strong> Lettuce (Lactuca Sativa L.) in West Bengal<br />

Madhurima Dey, Manimala Mahato and Dhananjoy Dutta<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Agronomy, Bidhan Chandra Krishi Viswavidyalaya,<br />

Mohanpur, Nadia, West Bengal, India 741252<br />

Leafy vegetables like lettuce demands more water and nutrients for better production, which<br />

sometimes leads to unbalanced and indiscriminate application <strong>of</strong> inputs. A field experiment<br />

was designed to find out the performance <strong>of</strong> lettuce under irrigation scheduling based on<br />

IW/CPE ratio combined with application <strong>of</strong> nitrogen through different sources.<br />

63 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Methodology<br />

The field experiment was carried out during the rabi seasons <strong>of</strong> 2017-18 and 2018-19 at<br />

B.C.K.V in sandy loam alluvial soil laid out in split-plot design with four main plot treatments<br />

viz. I1 = Irrigation at 15 days intervals (farmers’ practice), I2 = Irrigation at IW/CPE ratio 0.6,<br />

I 3= Irrigation at IW/CPE ratio 0.8, I 4= Irrigation at IW/CPE ratio1.0 and three subplot<br />

treatments viz. N1=100% RDN (Recommended dose <strong>of</strong> nitrogen) @ 100 kg N ha -1 (inorganic<br />

urea), N 2=75% RDN (inorganic urea) +25% RDN (vermicompost) and N 3= 100% RDN<br />

(vermicompost) replicated thrice. Vermicompost containing 1.8 % N was applied @ 5.5 and<br />

1.4 t ha -1 to supplement 100 kg and 25 kg N ha -1 in N3 and N2 treatments respectively. P2O5<br />

and K 2O @ 60 and 50 kg ha -1 respectively were applied uniformly to all plots. Irrigations based<br />

on IW/CPE ratio 1.0, 0.8 and 0.6 were given as per treatments when cumulative pan<br />

evaporation (CPE) reached at 50, 62.5 and 83.3 mm respectively and 50 mm depth <strong>of</strong> irrigation<br />

water was maintained in each irrigation. Seedlings <strong>of</strong> lettuce var. ‘Chinese Yellow’ were<br />

transplanted with a spacing <strong>of</strong> 40 cm × 30 cm in 4.8 m × 3.6 m plots with other management<br />

practices.<br />

Results<br />

Pooled results revealed that irrigation scheduled at 15 days interval along with 75% RDN from<br />

inorganic urea and 25% RDN from vermicompost treatment (I 1N 2) performed significantly<br />

better in terms <strong>of</strong> plant height (20.80 cm), fresh weight (681.55 g), yield (32.85 t ha -1 ) and<br />

water use efficiency (92.38 kg ha-mm -1 ), whereas, maximum no. <strong>of</strong> leaves plant -1 (52.89) was<br />

recorded in irrigation scheduled at 15 days interval along with 100% RDN from inorganic urea<br />

treatment (I1N1) which was statistically at par with I1N2. However, irrigation scheduled at<br />

IW/CPE 0.6 along with 100% RDN from inorganic urea treatment (I 2N 1) recorded lowest yield<br />

(18.15 t ha -1 ).<br />

Conclusion<br />

The study concluded that irrigation scheduled at 15 days interval along with 75% RDN from<br />

inorganic urea and 25% RDN from vermicompost can be recommended for better yield and<br />

water use efficiency in lettuce in New alluvial zone <strong>of</strong> West Bengal.<br />

Effects <strong>of</strong> irrigation and nitrogen sources on growth and yield <strong>of</strong> lettuce (Pooled)<br />

Treatment<br />

I 1 (Irrigation at<br />

15-day<br />

interval)<br />

Plant height<br />

(cm)<br />

No. <strong>of</strong> leaves<br />

plant -1<br />

Fresh weight<br />

plant -1 (g)<br />

Irrigation Level (I)<br />

Yield<br />

(t ha -1 )<br />

19.72 51.08 632.76 27.76<br />

Water use<br />

efficiency<br />

(kg ha-mm -1 )<br />

78.39<br />

64 | Page Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

I 2 (IW: CPE<br />

0.6)<br />

I 3 (IW: CPE<br />

0.8)<br />

I 4 (IW: CPE<br />

1.0)<br />

17.47 42.78 507.81 19.01<br />

18.36 43.66 531.04 20.88<br />

19.48 47.01 607.55 24.93<br />

S.Em (±) 0.21 0.36 5.43 0.95 --<br />

C. D. (P= 0.05) 0.74 1.26 18.80 3.27 --<br />

N 1(100% RDN<br />

inorganic urea)<br />

N 2(75% RDN<br />

(inorganic<br />

urea) +25%<br />

RDN<br />

(vermicompost)<br />

N 3 (100% RDN<br />

(vermicompost)<br />

Nitrogen Sources (N)<br />

18.42 47.48 573.57 23.70<br />

19.52 47.60 612.78 25.59<br />

18.34 42.73 523.03 19.92<br />

S.Em (±) 0.15 0.21 4.94 0.47 --<br />

C. D. (P= 0.05) 0.48 0.64 14.79 1.40 --<br />

Interaction (I× N)<br />

85.97<br />

79.77<br />

79.01<br />

83.04<br />

88.74<br />

70.58<br />

I 1N 1 19.35 52.89 628.12 27.96 81.13<br />

I 1N 2 20.80 52.40 681.55 32.85 92.38<br />

I 1N 3 19.03 47.99 588.64 21.57 61.67<br />

I 2N 1 16.13 42.68 486.53 18.15 81.53<br />

I 2N 2 18.39 44.12 547.93 20.03 90.66<br />

I 2N 3 17.89 41.56 488.98 18.84 85.72<br />

I 3N 1 18.07 45.13 517.96 19.93 77.58<br />

I 3N 2 19.40 45.56 603.73 23.89 91.74<br />

I 3N 3 17.63 40.31 471.44 18.81 69.98<br />

I 4N 1 20.14 49.17 661.66 28.76 91.93<br />

I 4N 2 19.50 48.33 617.92 25.57 80.16<br />

I 4N 3 18.81 43.56 543.08 20.47 64.95<br />

I×N N×I I×N N×I I×N N×I I×N N×I I×N N×I<br />

S.Em (±) 0.22 0.31 0.43 0.55 9.87 10.65 0.94 1.33 --<br />

C. D. (P= 0.05) 0.74 0.93 1.29 1.27 29.59 23.66 2.81 3.09 --<br />

Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance<br />

65 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

T1-21P-1145<br />

Effect <strong>of</strong> Irrigation and Mulch on Summer Babycorn (Zea mays L.) in New<br />

Alluvial Zone <strong>of</strong> West Bengal<br />

V.V.S. Jaya Krishna, Abhijit Saha and Dhananjoy Dutta<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Agronomy, Bidhan Chandra Krishi Viswavidyalay,<br />

Mohanpur, Nadia, West Bengal, India-741252<br />

Optimization <strong>of</strong> irrigation schedules along with use <strong>of</strong> mulch is an effective moisture<br />

conservation technique for raising summer crops under limited water. Moreover, the use <strong>of</strong><br />

biodegradable mulches like jute based geo-textile, crop residues etc. has widely been accepted<br />

technology due to beneficial effects on soil. Hence, an attempt was being made to obtain higher<br />

yield and better quality <strong>of</strong> summer babycorn through efficient management <strong>of</strong> irrigation and<br />

mulches.<br />

Methodology<br />

Field investigation was conducted at BCKV, West Bengal during summer (March – May) <strong>of</strong><br />

2016 & 2017 to find out the growth, yield, nutrients uptake, quality, water use efficiency<br />

(WUE), economics and water stress index <strong>of</strong> babycorn (cv. G-5414) under different irrigation<br />

scheduling and mulching in a split-plot design with three irrigation treatments in main plot<br />

like IW/CPE 1.0, 0.80 & 0.60 and four mulch treatments in sub-plots such as no mulch, black<br />

polythene mulch (30 µ), paddy straw mulch @ 5t/ha and jute based geo-textile mulch @ 500<br />

gsm replicated thrice in sandy loam soil, neutral pH (6.52), medium fertility, field capacity <strong>of</strong><br />

18.58% and permanent wilting point <strong>of</strong> 8.1%. The crop was planted in raised-bed with 45 cm<br />

× 20 cm spacing and fertilized uniformly with 10 t FYM + N:P2O5: K2O @ 120: 60: 40 kg/ha<br />

as basal. Polythene and jute (geo-textile) sheets were placed over the bed before sowing and<br />

seeds are dibbled in wholes adjusted with the spacing, while straw mulch was applied 5-7 days<br />

after germination. Other standard agronomic package <strong>of</strong> practices was followed. Irrigation<br />

depth 5 cm was maintained by V notch.<br />

Results<br />

In respect to main effect <strong>of</strong> treatments, irrigation at IW/CPE 1.0 (I 1) and polythene mulch (M 1)<br />

was found superior than others and therefore, their interaction (I1M1) excelled other<br />

combinations in terms <strong>of</strong> growth attributes like plant height (208.38 cm), dry matter<br />

accumulation (1912.55 g/m 2 ) and yield attributes like cob no. /plant (2.22), cob weight without<br />

husk (8.36 g) and cob yield (2019 kg/ha), uptake <strong>of</strong> N (56.12 kg/ha), P2O5 (22.84 kg/ha) and<br />

K 2O (51.71 kg/ha), crude protein (15.98%), crude fibre (41.96%), consumptive water use<br />

efficiency (10.59 kg/ha-mm), net return (Rs. 161294/ha) and benefit-cost ratio (3.07).<br />

66 | Page Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Effect <strong>of</strong> irrigation and mulch on cob length with and without husk (pooled)<br />

Treatment<br />

Irrigation(I)<br />

Plant height<br />

(cm)<br />

Cob<br />

no./plant<br />

Cob yield<br />

(kg/ha)<br />

N uptake<br />

(kg/ha)<br />

Benefitcost<br />

ratio<br />

WUE (kg/hamm)<br />

I 1 (IW/CPE 1.0) 186.46 2.04 1618 41.55 2.67 8.83<br />

I 2 (IW/CPE 0.8) 179.21 1.92 1242 36.60 2.22 8.32<br />

I 3 (IW/CPE 0.6) 171.80 1.67 962 31.55 1.88 8.42<br />

CD at 5% 1.94 0.15 26.77 1.17<br />

Mulching (M)<br />

M 0 (No mulch) 159.49 1.71 918 25.42 2.25 6.48<br />

M 1 (Polythene<br />

mulch 30 µ)<br />

M 2 (Paddy straw<br />

mulch @ 5t/ha)<br />

M 3 (Jute mulch @<br />

500 gsm)<br />

198.00 2.06 1557 49.23<br />

176.55 1.76 1210 34.04<br />

182.60 1.98 1411 37.57<br />

CD at 5% 2.27 0.14 23.79 0.74<br />

Interaction<br />

2.57 9.98<br />

2.44 8.28<br />

1.77 9.28<br />

I 1M 0 166.21 1.84 1064 29.10 2.58 6.34<br />

I 1M 1 208.38 2.22 2019 56.12 3.07 10.59<br />

I 1M 2 182.17 1.95 1586 38.54 2.95 8.56<br />

I 1M 3 189.09 2.17 1803 42.44 2.09 9.51<br />

I 2M 0 160.44 1.78 914 25.24 2.25 6.23<br />

I 2M 1 197.40 2.11 1529 49.11 2.54 9.82<br />

I 2M 2 176.93 1.78 1133 34.14 2.35 7.99<br />

I 2M 3 182.08 2.00 1392 37.89 1.75 9.12<br />

I 3M 0 151.81 1.50 776 21.93 1.92 7.04<br />

I 3M 1 188.20 1.84 1124 42.45 2.10 9.22<br />

I 3M 2 170.56 1.56 911 29.44 2.03 8.19<br />

I 3M 3 176.63 1.78 1037 32.37 1.46 9.12<br />

I×M M×I I×M M×I I×M M×I I×M M×I<br />

CD at 5% 3.94 3.92 NS NS 41.21 44.53 1.28 1.59<br />

Conclusion<br />

Irrigation at IW/CPE 1.0 along with polythene mulching can be recommended for enhancing<br />

productivity, pr<strong>of</strong>itability and water use efficiency <strong>of</strong> summer babycorn in West Bengal.<br />

Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance<br />

67 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

T1-22P-1197<br />

Enhancing Water Productivity in the Scarce Rainfall Zone <strong>of</strong> Andhra<br />

Pradesh through Farmponds with Seepage Control<br />

Boini Narsimlu 1 , N. Kishore, 2 , Sahadeva Reddy 2 , G. Ravindra Chary 1 , K.B. Sridhar 1<br />

and K.A. Gopinath 1<br />

1 ICAR-Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, Hyderabad-500059, Telangana.<br />

2 AICRPDA centre, Acharya N G Ranga Agricultural University, Ananthapuramu-515001, A.P<br />

Rainfed agriculture in India accounts for about 51% (72.98 m ha) <strong>of</strong> the net cultivated area,<br />

supports 40% <strong>of</strong> total food grain production, 60% <strong>of</strong> livestock population and is mainly<br />

depends on rainfall. It is mainly monsoon reliant, risk prone and <strong>of</strong>ten encounters extreme<br />

variations in rainfall resulting in wide variation and instability in crop yields. Rainfed area<br />

covered in Andhra Pradesh is about 67% (25.03 lakh ha) and in scarce rainfall zone it is about<br />

72% (14.88 lakh ha) area. This scarce rainfall zone is drought prone which is characterized by<br />

inadequate and erratic rainfall coupled with high evapotranspiration rate and eroded soils.<br />

Water harvesting is an ancient tradition and used for millennia in most dry lands <strong>of</strong> the world;<br />

many different techniques were developed. The on-farm run<strong>of</strong>f collection into farm ponds and<br />

recycling through supplemental irrigation can increase and stabilize the crop production. There<br />

is an abundant scope and opportunity for harvesting excess run<strong>of</strong>f in the rainfed region in<br />

different states <strong>of</strong> the country. In a case study a farm pond with capacity <strong>of</strong> 50 m 3 , by using<br />

drip system irrigation system, it is adequate to meet supplemental irrigation requirement for a<br />

kitchen garden <strong>of</strong> 300– 600 m 2 planted with 90 days growing period cabbages. The cost-benefit<br />

analysis showed that farm ponds are feasible solutions to persistent crop failures in semi-arid<br />

areas (Ngigi et al., 2005). Harvested rainwater in farm pond will be able to provide life-saving<br />

irrigation to standing crops when they are exposed to mid-term/terminal drought and also for<br />

pre-sowing irrigation in post-rainy crops in rainfed areas. Study results on Nadi system<br />

established under RKVY scheme in Bhilwara district during the year 2011–2013 indicates an<br />

increased the water productivity by 28 to 48.5% in both the seasons (Jat et al., 2016). The<br />

objectives are to study the performance and economics <strong>of</strong> lined vis-à-vis unlined farm ponds<br />

and to assess the efficacy <strong>of</strong> lining material used in farm ponds in minimizing the seepage<br />

losses across different zones.<br />

Methodology<br />

Study area is in scarce rainfall zone <strong>of</strong> Andhra Pradesh State and is under arid (hot) climate<br />

with mean annual rainfall <strong>of</strong> 544 mm. The dominant soils <strong>of</strong> the region are alfisols (red soils)<br />

and few black soil packets with predominant groundnut based rainfed production system.<br />

Major crops grown during kharif season area groundnut, pigeonpea, maize, sunflower, rice,<br />

cotton and in rabi finger millet and chickpea. The farm holding size <strong>of</strong> the regions is small and<br />

68 | Page Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

marginal farmers counting to 70 percent. A large number <strong>of</strong> farm ponds were dug with the<br />

support <strong>of</strong> programmes such as State Government special program <strong>of</strong> 1.0 lakh farm ponds for<br />

enhancing groundwater recharge, MGNREGA and watershed development programmes,<br />

NGO’s (RDT) introduced and ICAR-NICRA programmes in the study area. On-farm data was<br />

collected through inventory <strong>of</strong> farm ponds in farmers’ fields to assess the benefits <strong>of</strong> different<br />

lining material used for seepage control and effective utilisation <strong>of</strong> harvested rainwater in<br />

scarce rainfall zone. Data attributes like size <strong>of</strong> farm pond, lining material used and availability,<br />

water harvested, seepage losses, crops grown etc., were recorded and analysed for benefit cost<br />

ratio.<br />

Without lining HPDE 250 GSM lining Soil cement lining 4:1 ratio Soil cement lining 6:1<br />

Results<br />

Inventory results samples collected from locations which were identified with GPS includes<br />

lined and unlined farm ponds in Ananthapuramu district <strong>of</strong> A.P. The lining material used by<br />

farmers are HDPE sheet <strong>of</strong> 250, 300 and 500 microns, LDPE, Bricks+cement, local<br />

stoneslabs+cement and soil +cement in 8:1 ratio for seepage control and effective utilisation.<br />

On-farm inventory in the scarce rainfall zone with annual average rainfall <strong>of</strong> 544 mm under<br />

arid alfisols in Andhra Pradesh, among the different seepage control methods used, a farm pond<br />

with capacity <strong>of</strong> 250 m 3 , under 1 ha catchment with soil+cement (6:1) lining was efficiently<br />

used (two irrigation <strong>of</strong> 1.0 cm each) during dry spells on groundnut crop. The crop productivity<br />

by lined farm pond is 1230 kg/ha, when compared to 820 kg/ha from unlined farm pond. The<br />

constraints observed during the study for sustainability <strong>of</strong> farm ponds in these agroclimatic<br />

zones are exposure <strong>of</strong> material to high temperature, physical damage by animals, poor<br />

maintenance <strong>of</strong> lining material, availability <strong>of</strong> run<strong>of</strong>f during the <strong>of</strong>fseason etc.<br />

Conclusions<br />

In the scarce rainfall zone with annual average rainfall <strong>of</strong> 544 mm under arid alfisols in Andhra<br />

Pradesh, shows among the different seepage control methods used, a farm pond with capacity<br />

<strong>of</strong> 250 m 3 , under 1 ha catchment with soil+cement (6:1) lining was efficiently used (two<br />

irrigation <strong>of</strong> 1.0 cm each) during dry spells on groundnut crop. The crop productivity by lined<br />

farm pond was 1230 kg/ha, when compared to 820 kg/ha from unlined farm pond. Farm pond<br />

are found suitable to address the issue <strong>of</strong> water scarcity by storing excess <strong>of</strong> canal water as well<br />

as rainfall for applying to field as and when required. The major constraints observed in this<br />

Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance<br />

69 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

study was exposure <strong>of</strong> lining material to high temperature and unavailability <strong>of</strong> run<strong>of</strong>f during<br />

<strong>of</strong>fseason.<br />

References<br />

Jat, M. and Mahela. M. 2016. Economic feasibility <strong>of</strong> refinement or renovation <strong>of</strong> a water<br />

harvesting structure (Nadi)-Asuccess story. Indian J. Soil Conserv., 46(1): 60–67.<br />

Ngigi, S.N., Savenije, H.H.G., Thome, J.N., Rockström, J., De Vries, F.W.T.P. 2005. Agrohydrological<br />

evaluation <strong>of</strong> on-farm rainwater storage systems for supplemental<br />

irrigation in Laikipia district, Kenya. Agric. Water Manage., 73: 21–41.<br />

T1-23P-1198<br />

Maximize the Production <strong>of</strong> Blackgram Through Furrow Irrigated Raised<br />

Bed Planting Methods Under Aberrated Climatic Regions<br />

R.K. Singh 1 , S.R.K. Singh 2 and D.P. Sharma 3<br />

1 Directore ATARI Zone IX and 4 Director Extension Services<br />

Jawaharlal Nehru Krishi Vishwa Vidyalaya, Krishi Vigyan Kendra Chhatarpur- 471201, M.P.<br />

Blackgram (Vigna mungo.) is an important economic pulse crop and considered as a good<br />

source <strong>of</strong> protein for human being. Blackgram has been a predominant crop in Madhya<br />

Pradesh especially in Chhatarpur district which accounts for 65.1% (2, 61,450 ha) area under<br />

Blackgram Cultivation. The district Chhatarpur falls under central portion on the plateau <strong>of</strong><br />

Bundelkhand region in Madhya Pradesh. and lies between north latitudes 240 06’ and 250<br />

20’ and longitude 790 59’ and 800 26 East. Current average productivity <strong>of</strong> the crop in the<br />

district is 540 kg per ha as against the state and national productivity <strong>of</strong> 730 and 585 kg per<br />

ha respectively. Though there are several factors for low production and productivity <strong>of</strong><br />

blackgram in the district, however, lower seed replacement with improved varieties and<br />

uncertainty <strong>of</strong> rainfall is crucial one. Because climate change during the last decade, the<br />

rainfall pattern and distribution has exhibited frequent aberrations with extreme situation <strong>of</strong><br />

sudden downpour or long dry spells entailing in to severe stress on blackgram crop that results<br />

reduction in yield. Keeping the above facts, the act <strong>of</strong> Furrow Irrigated Raised Bed Planter<br />

and improved variety <strong>of</strong> blackgram PU 31 and IPU 2-43 strategies for minimizing risk <strong>of</strong> crop<br />

failure and stabilizing blackgram production was felt. Under such circumstances, KVK<br />

Chhatarpur <strong>of</strong> Madhya Pradesh introduced Furrrow Irrigated raised bed planter equipment to<br />

line sowing <strong>of</strong> Blackgram through front line demonstration at farmer’s field under NICRA<br />

Village. These demonstrations brought out enhancement in yield <strong>of</strong> Blackgram as 7.5 q/ha<br />

over farmers practice 4.2 q/ha. The benefit cost ratio was recorded as 1: 2.6 as compared to<br />

farmers practices 1:1.7. The ridge and furrow equipment save the soil moisture through<br />

70 | Page Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

increased infiltration rate <strong>of</strong> rain fall and reduced run<strong>of</strong>f that leads slow rate <strong>of</strong> soil erosion.<br />

The furrow which allows drainage <strong>of</strong> excess water in case <strong>of</strong> heavy precipitation, while serves<br />

as in situ moisture conservation during dry spells, thus mitigating the detrimental effects <strong>of</strong><br />

excess and dry spell situation.<br />

T1-24P-1229<br />

Integrating Improved Land, Water Management Practices and Cropping<br />

Systems for Sustainable Farming in Drylands <strong>of</strong> Northern Karnataka: A<br />

Case Study<br />

M. S. Shirahatti 1 , V.S. Surakod 1 , S.G. Kanti 1 , H.S. Patil 1 and G. Ravindra Chary 2<br />

1 AICRP on Dryland Agriculture, Vijayapura, Karnataka<br />

2 ICAR - CRIDA, Hyderabad – 500 059, Telangana<br />

The total amount <strong>of</strong> rainfall in the semi-arid tropics (SAT) regions is adequate to meet the water<br />

requirement <strong>of</strong> the crops and cropping systems, its erratic distribution results in periods <strong>of</strong><br />

excess and deficit water availability, leading to low productivity and degradation <strong>of</strong> natural<br />

resources. In recent years, due to climate change, the weather aberrations such as delayed onset<br />

<strong>of</strong> monsoon, prolonged dry spells and high rainfall events during the crop growth period have<br />

become common, thereby reducing the yields <strong>of</strong> rainfed crops. Under the climate change<br />

scenario, the number <strong>of</strong> rainy days is decreased, but rainfall intensity increases. Therefore, an<br />

integrated water resources management approach comprising in-situ water conservation,<br />

harvesting <strong>of</strong> excess water in ponds and groundwater recharging and its efficient use through<br />

appropriate supplemental irrigation methods, improved crop varieties and cropping systems,<br />

balanced nutrition <strong>of</strong> crops, crop diversification and intensification with high value crops and<br />

crop protection is needed to produce more food and income per unit <strong>of</strong> rainfall.<br />

Methodology<br />

The Northern Dry zone <strong>of</strong> Karnataka falls in the semi-arid tropics, annual rainfall is low and<br />

erratic (LPA <strong>of</strong> 594 mm and CV <strong>of</strong> 30%). High insolation (18.9-21.0 MJ/m 2 /day) and high<br />

wind speed during mid kharif season (20 km/hr) cause annual potential evaporation (1,574<br />

mm) that far exceeds rainfall, leading to 988 mm <strong>of</strong> water deficit and aridity index <strong>of</strong> 62%. The<br />

rainfall and run<strong>of</strong>f studies revealed that generally there would be 5 to 6 run<strong>of</strong>f events occurring<br />

in the year, and a minimum 22 mm rainfall is required for the occurrence <strong>of</strong> the run<strong>of</strong>f. Long<br />

term run<strong>of</strong>f data analysis revealed that annual run<strong>of</strong>f would be about 12-14 per cent <strong>of</strong> the<br />

annual rainfall. Further, the ground water balance study revealed that ground water recharge<br />

normally occurs during September and October months. The annual ground water recharge is<br />

about 8 % <strong>of</strong> the annual rainfall. 80 per cent <strong>of</strong> the soil is shallow to medium to deep black soil.<br />

The infiltration rate <strong>of</strong> the black cotton soil is low and 1-2% slope is prevailed in the area,<br />

which gives the less opportunity time for infiltration.<br />

Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance<br />

71 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Under the DARE, GoI, SFC funded project, during 2013-15, Honwad village, was selected<br />

from the Vijayapura district. SWC structures (bunds, farm ponds) were constructed in 500 ha<br />

area <strong>of</strong> project village, also other dry land practices were demonstrated and custom hire service<br />

centre was established. Under the project, the largescale demonstrations at the micro watershed<br />

level with the farmers’ participation comprising in-situ water conservation, harvesting <strong>of</strong><br />

excess water in ponds and groundwater recharging and its efficient use through appropriate<br />

supplemental irrigation methods, improved crop varieties, cropping systems were conducted<br />

in the farmers’ fields <strong>of</strong> the Honwad village. The Honwad village is located about 25 kilometers<br />

from the Vijayapura city.<br />

A. Soil and water conservation works undertaken at Honwad micro-watershed<br />

The graded bund, Zing conservation, Pipe outlet, Waste weir, Farm Pond and Open well<br />

recharge structures were constructed at Honwad micro watershed.<br />

a. Zing conservation: The concept <strong>of</strong> contour bunding is widely practiced to conserve in-situ<br />

rain water. The practice <strong>of</strong> contour bunding could be slightly modified by leveling 1/3 or<br />

1/4 area on the upstream side <strong>of</strong> the bund to form a zing terrace. The leveled portion <strong>of</strong> zing<br />

conservation helps to increase the water spread area and provides more opportunity time<br />

for the rain water to percolate in. The increased moisture retention in-situ helps the crops<br />

to yield more in years <strong>of</strong> normal rainfall. The impact is more pronounced during sub normal<br />

rainfall years. It also provides opportunities for double cropping in the leveled portions.<br />

The high value and horticultural crops could be successfully raised in the leveled portions.<br />

In the unleveled areas drought crops may be grown.<br />

b. Farmpond: During the year 2013-14, two farmponds were dug in the micro-watershed<br />

each measuring 23 X 17 X 3 m (1198 cum & 1211.62 cum), which were not only the source<br />

<strong>of</strong> drinking water for the people and animals living around ponds but also providing water<br />

for taking up sprays to control pests by the farmers in the area. When there were no<br />

expectations <strong>of</strong> rains after the sowing <strong>of</strong> sorghum, the irrigation provided from the ponds<br />

with the 1.5 HP petrol start-diesel run pump and sprinkler system saved the sorghum and<br />

bengalgram crop. The ponds were full with the receipt <strong>of</strong> first rains. It was refilled with the<br />

receipt <strong>of</strong> subsequent rains. Till the end <strong>of</strong> February 2015, more than 50% <strong>of</strong> water was<br />

available to use.<br />

c. Open well recharge: The run<strong>of</strong>f from the nearby nala was diverted to the open well<br />

through the filter. This technique was initiated at two locations to demonstrate the<br />

importance <strong>of</strong> open well recharge to enhance the farm productivity by providing<br />

supplemental irrigations at crops critical stages. With the receipt <strong>of</strong> first rains, the open well<br />

was recharged with water up to 20 ft, while the second rain filled the open well completely.<br />

This water was sufficient to irrigate two acres. Till now the well was full for seven times.<br />

72 | Page Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

It helped to irrigate crops especially during summer. It was witnessed in the increase in<br />

amount <strong>of</strong> water in the nearby bore wells. The quality <strong>of</strong> water improved now compared to<br />

earlier times. The water table too increased in the area surrounding open well.<br />

d. Graded bunds also reduce the run<strong>of</strong>f velocity and there by enhance in-situ rain water<br />

harvesting.<br />

e. Pipe outlet and waste weir: These structures act as safe rainwater disposal units, if rainfall<br />

received in high intensity.<br />

Results<br />

i. Compartment bunding: An in-situ conservation practice <strong>of</strong> “Compartment bunding” was<br />

developed by the AICRP, Centre, Vijayapura, Karnataka. After receipt <strong>of</strong> few showers in June-<br />

July 2013, land was harrowed to remove germinating weeds. Compartment bunds were<br />

demonstrated over an area <strong>of</strong> 23 ha covering 25 farmers’ fields in which observations on yield<br />

impact were recorded in 8 demonstrations under compartment bunding. After adoption <strong>of</strong><br />

compartment bunding in safflower, sunflower and chickpea they have recorded yield advantage<br />

<strong>of</strong> 16.70, 79.80 and 12.07 per cent respectively over no compartment bunding or flat planting.<br />

ii. Crop varietal demonstrations: The new crop variety in various crops viz., rabi sorghum<br />

(DSV-4), sunflower (KBSH-53) & chickpea (JG-11) were demonstrated as a sole crop as well<br />

intercropping systems. The results revealed that the yield advantage <strong>of</strong> 10.55 to 41.67 per cent<br />

in case <strong>of</strong> introduction <strong>of</strong> new crop varieties. During 2014-15, effect <strong>of</strong> SWC structures and<br />

improved varieties on crop productivity was measured by recording yields <strong>of</strong> five principle<br />

crops from demonstration farmers, ten non-demonstration watershed farmers benefitted from<br />

SWC structures and ten outside watershed farmers and the average was worked out. The<br />

highest per cent increase <strong>of</strong> demonstration yields over non-demonstration in watershed was<br />

13.53 in sunflower followed by wheat (11.40), safflower (9.65), sorghum (9.40) and<br />

bengalgram (7.88) while the per cent increase <strong>of</strong> watershed demonstration over outside<br />

watershed ranged from 18.33 (sorghum) to 33.50 (sunflower).<br />

iii. Demonstration on intercropping systems: The intercropping systems viz., sorghum+<br />

chickpea (2:4), chickpea + safflower (4:2) were introduced in the form <strong>of</strong> demonstrations in<br />

which intercropping systems recorded 160 and 18.05 per cent higher yield advantage over sole<br />

cropping.<br />

Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance<br />

73 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Effect <strong>of</strong> SWC structures and improved varieties on crop productivity (2014-15)<br />

Crop<br />

Outside<br />

watershed<br />

Nondemonstration<br />

Watershed<br />

Demonstration<br />

Per cent<br />

increase <strong>of</strong><br />

demonstration<br />

over non-demo<br />

in watershed<br />

Per cent<br />

increase <strong>of</strong><br />

watershed<br />

demonstration<br />

over outside<br />

watershed<br />

Bengalgram 1350 1585 1710 7.88 26.66<br />

Sunflower 961 1130 1283 13.53 33.50<br />

Sorghum 1396 1510 1652 9.40 18.33<br />

Safflower 920 1088 1193 9.65 29.67<br />

Wheat 1337 1508 1680 11.40 25.65<br />

Conclusion<br />

An integrated water resources management approach comprising in-situ water conservation<br />

measures including both inter terrace and terrace level practices, harvesting <strong>of</strong> excess water in<br />

ponds and groundwater recharging, improved crop varieties and improved inter-cropping<br />

systems produce more food and income per unit <strong>of</strong> rainfall.<br />

T1-25P-1265<br />

Effect <strong>of</strong> Supplemental Irrigation on Yield and Economics <strong>of</strong> Different<br />

Pulse and Oilseed Crops under Dryland Condition in Palamau Region <strong>of</strong><br />

Jharkhand<br />

Nargis Kumari, Mintu Job, D.N. Singh, Abhishek Patel and Asha Kumari Sinha<br />

All India Coordinated Research Project on Dryland agriculture, Chianki,<br />

Birsa Agricultural University, Ranchi- 834 006, Jharkhand<br />

Rainfed agriculture is the main feature <strong>of</strong> Jharkhand state and rice is the most important crop<br />

in major part <strong>of</strong> eastern India comprising Assam, West Bengal, Jharkhand, Orissa, Chhattisgarh<br />

and eastern UP during the kharif and growing second crops in rice - fallow after rice harvesting<br />

during rabi, soil moisture availability is the main limiting factor for growing second crops in<br />

rainfed rice fallows <strong>of</strong> eastern India (Kar et al., 2006). In view <strong>of</strong> rapid increase in population<br />

and day by day decrease in water resources and to fulfill the increasing pulse demand and<br />

decreasing pulse production; sustainable water management practices and estimation <strong>of</strong> water<br />

requirement will help to increase productivity <strong>of</strong> pulses, water productivity, water use<br />

efficiency and area <strong>of</strong> pulses under irrigation. Improving water use efficiency in agriculture<br />

will require an increase in crop water productivity i.e., an increase in marketable crop yield per<br />

unit <strong>of</strong> water used by plant and reduction in water losses from the crop root zone. Among the<br />

sustainable water management practices, scheduling irrigation based on evaporation is one <strong>of</strong><br />

the best methods in semi-arid condition where annual rainfall is low. Crop water requirement<br />

is the total water needed for evapotranspiration, from planting to harvest for a given crop in a<br />

74 | Page Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

specific climate regime, when adequate soil moisture maintained by rainfall and/or irrigation<br />

so that it does not limit plant growth and crop yield. The assessment <strong>of</strong> water needs <strong>of</strong> the crop<br />

based on day-to-day weather parameters seems to be more rational than any other method in<br />

agricultural fields, large spatial variations in soil water content are associated with soil<br />

heterogeneities such as precipitation level, land cover, topography, evapotranspiration etc.<br />

Keeping this in view, the present investigation “yield and economics <strong>of</strong> pulses and oilseed as<br />

influenced by irrigation levels in Dry Zone <strong>of</strong> Jharkhand” was taken up during kharif 2020 and<br />

2021 at Zonal Research Station, Palamau, Jharkhand.<br />

Methodology<br />

The experiment was conducted in split plot design during winter season for two consecutive<br />

years from 2020-21 & 2021-2022 having three levels <strong>of</strong> supplemental irrigation one irrigation<br />

at Pre- flowering stage at 50-60 DAS (I1), One irrigation at pre - Pod formation at 60-70 DAS<br />

( I 2 ) & combinations <strong>of</strong> both (I 3) to provide lifesaving irrigation at critical stages <strong>of</strong> different<br />

pulse and oilseed crops viz.C1 - Chickpea, C2 – Lentil, C3 - Linseed and C4 – Safflower at Zonal<br />

Research Station, Chianki (Palamau) under All India Coordinated Research Project on Dryland<br />

agriculture <strong>of</strong> Birsa Agricultural University, Ranchi (Jharkhand).The soil was sandy loam in<br />

texture, with pH 5.6, organic carbon 0.47%, available nitrogen 265.4 kg ha -1 , phosphorus 14.7<br />

kg ha -1 and potassium 175.2 kg ha -1 .<br />

Results<br />

Different rabi pulse and oilseed crops were compared in respect <strong>of</strong> irrigation levels ie.<br />

supplemental irrigation at different crop development stage. Significantly higher mean seed<br />

yield (1141 kg ha -1 ) was recorded when two supplemental irrigations (I3) were supplied to the<br />

crop ie 1 st at Pre- flowering stage (50-60 DAS) and 2 nd at Pre -pod formation stage (60-70<br />

DAS). Similarly, maximum Net return (Rs.29111 ha -1 ), B:C ratio (1.81) and RWUE (40.49 kg<br />

ha -1 mm -1 ) were obtained with I3 which showed its superiority over irrigation level I1& I2.<br />

Among different pulse and oilseed crops, results revealed that maximum mean seed yield (1073<br />

kg ha -1 ) was exhibited by Chickpea crop which was significantly superior to safflower yield<br />

but at par with lentil (919 kg ha -1 ) & linseed yield (914 kg ha -1 ). Similarly, higher mean value<br />

<strong>of</strong> Net return (29697Rs. ha -1 ) & RWUE (38.16kg ha -1 mm -1 ) but B:C ration was higher in lentil<br />

crop (2.06) it might be due to differences in cost <strong>of</strong> cultivation.<br />

Conclusion<br />

The treatment combination <strong>of</strong> irrigation provides to life saving irrigation at critical stages <strong>of</strong><br />

chickpea recorded a significantly higher yield 1141 kg ha-1 than the rest <strong>of</strong> the combinations.<br />

Hence scheduling irrigation (I 3) in pulses enhances growth and yield in rainfed areas <strong>of</strong><br />

Jharkhand.<br />

Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance<br />

75 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Effect <strong>of</strong> irrigation levels on productivity and pr<strong>of</strong>itability <strong>of</strong> different pulse and oilseed<br />

crops under dryland conditions<br />

Treatment Seed yield (kg ha -1 ) Net return (Rs. ha -1 ) B: C ratio<br />

Irrigation level<br />

I 1 816 17302 1.42<br />

I 2 830 18618 1.49<br />

I 3 1141 29111 1.81<br />

SEm± 25.12 1420.23 0.04<br />

CD (P=0.05) 101.27 5725.86 0.18<br />

Crops<br />

Chickpea 1073 29697 1.67<br />

Lentil 919 28483 2.06<br />

Linseed 915 3159 0.63<br />

Safflower 809 25369 1.93<br />

SEm± 29.01 1012.23 0.05<br />

CD (P=0.05) 86.86 3030.80 0.14<br />

References<br />

Kar, G., Verma, H.N. and Singh, R. 2006. Effects <strong>of</strong> winter crop and supplemental irrigation<br />

on crop yield, water use efficiency and pr<strong>of</strong>itability in rainfed rice-based cropping<br />

system <strong>of</strong> eastern India. Agric. Water Manage., 79: 280–292.<br />

Todorovic, M. 2005. Crop water requirements. In: Water Encyclopedia: Surface and<br />

Agricultural Water (Jay H. Lehr, Jack Keeley, Eds.), AW-59, p. 557-558, John Wiley<br />

& Sons Publisher, USA<br />

T1-26P-1275<br />

Water Use, Yield and Economics <strong>of</strong> Maize as Influenced by Drip Irrigation<br />

Schedules and Nitrogen Levels<br />

Y. Deepthi Kiran, V. Sumathi and G. Prabhakara Reddy<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Agronomy, S.V.Agricultural College, Acharya N.G. Ranga Agricultural University,<br />

Tirupati-517 502, Andhra Pradesh, India<br />

Water and nitrogen are two important resources for crop production. Yields in maize respond<br />

positively with an increase in the amount <strong>of</strong> water and nitrogen applied and reaches the plateau<br />

at their optimum doses. Hence, the present study was under taken to examine the appropriate<br />

irrigation schedule through drip as well as nitrogen application rate.<br />

76 | Page Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Methodology<br />

The field experiment was conducted for two consecutive years (2013-14 and 2014-15) to<br />

evaluate the water use, yield and economic returns from maize under different irrigation<br />

schedules and nitrogen levels at S.V. Agricultural College, wet land farm, Tirupati, Andhra<br />

Pradesh. The experiment was laid out in split-plot design and replicated thrice. The treatments<br />

comprised <strong>of</strong> four main plots viz., M1 (drip irrigation at 0.7 IW/CPE ratio), M2 (drip irrigation<br />

at 0.8 IW/CPE ratio), M 3 (drip irrigation at 0.9 IW/CPE ratio) and M 4 (weekly check basin<br />

irrigation) and three sub plots viz., N 1 (160 kg N ha -1 ), N 2 (200 kg N ha -1 ) and N 3 (240 kg N<br />

ha -1 ). To schedule the drip irrigation at prescribed IW/CPE ratios the treatments were<br />

maintained to field capacity in the top 0-45 cm depth i.e. only effective root zone depth,<br />

whereas for check basin irrigation the depth <strong>of</strong> water was 50 cm.<br />

Results<br />

The study revealed that significantly, higher water use efficiency was recorded with irrigation<br />

through drip at 0.9 IW/CPE ratio, but the yield and economics <strong>of</strong> maize were found to be higher<br />

with weekly check basin method, which were on par to that obtained with drip irrigation at 0.9<br />

IW/CPE ratio (Table 1&2). With regard to nitrogen levels tried, water use efficiency, yield and<br />

economics were found to be superior with the nitrogen dose <strong>of</strong> 240 kg N ha -1 . This might be<br />

due to the better availability <strong>of</strong> nutrients under higher soil moisture and at high nitrogen<br />

conditions which might have increased the crop growth and translocation <strong>of</strong> photosynthates<br />

from source to sink. The benefit from per rupee investment, gross and net returns were higher<br />

with drip irrigation scheduled at 0.9 IW/CPE ratio.<br />

Water use and yield <strong>of</strong> maize as influenced by drip irrigation schedules and nitrogen<br />

levels<br />

Treatment<br />

M 1 : 0.7 IW/CPE under<br />

drip irrigation<br />

M 2 : 0.8 IW/CPE under<br />

drip irrigation<br />

M 3 : 0.9 IW/CPE under<br />

drip irrigation<br />

Water use efficiency<br />

(kg ha-mm -1 )<br />

Kernel yield (kg ha -1 )<br />

2013-14 2014-15 2013-14 2014-15<br />

Irrigation schedules<br />

11.7 12.2 2582 2717<br />

14.7 14.9 3774 3813<br />

16.4 16.5 4572 4525<br />

M 4 : Weekly check basin 12.9 12.4 4630 4724<br />

Nitrogen levels<br />

N 1 : 160 kg ha -1 11.5 11.8 3177 3289<br />

N 1 : 200 kg ha -1 14.9 14.7 4166 4170<br />

Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance<br />

77 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

N 1 : 240 kg ha -1 15.3 15.3 4326 4376<br />

SEm± CD SEm± CD SEm± CD SEm± CD<br />

M 0.43 1.53 0.54 1.91 128 453 141 498<br />

N 0.12 0.37 0.21 0.63 34 102 40 122<br />

Mat N 0.48 NS 0.64 NS 140 482 155 536<br />

N at M 0.75 NS 0.94 NS 223 234 244 278<br />

(CD at P=0.05)<br />

Among the nitrogen levels, monetary returns were higher with 240 kg N ha -1 . The interaction<br />

between the irrigation schedules and nitrogen levels indicated that higher yield and monetary<br />

returns were observed with scheduling irrigation either by weekly check basin method or by<br />

drip irrigation at 0.9 IW/CPE ratio along with 240 kg N ha -1 , but the water use efficiency was<br />

found to be non-significant. The highest water use efficiency yield, monetary returns under<br />

higher irrigation regimes <strong>of</strong> 0.9 IW/CPE ratio through drip and weekly irrigations using check<br />

basin method along with higher nitrogen doses might be due to increased kernel yields under<br />

favourable moisture conditions coupled with ample supply <strong>of</strong> nitrogen. Similar evidences were<br />

reported by Krishnasamy et al., (2012).<br />

Economics <strong>of</strong> maize as influenced by drip irrigation schedules and nitrogen levels<br />

Treatment<br />

Gross returns (Rs. ha -1 ) Net returns (Rs. ha -1 )<br />

Returns per rupee invested<br />

(Rs. ha -1 )<br />

2013-14 2014-15 2013-14 2014-15 2013-14 2014-15<br />

Irrigation schedules<br />

M 1 : 0.7<br />

IW/CPE<br />

under drip<br />

irrigation 68993 72176 20922 24105 1.43 1.50<br />

M 2 : 0.8<br />

IW/CPE<br />

under drip<br />

irrigation 90033 91718 41301 42986 1.85 1.88<br />

M 3 : 0.9<br />

IW/CPE<br />

under drip<br />

irrigation 104311 104298 54919 54906 2.11 2.11<br />

M 4 :<br />

Weekly<br />

check<br />

basin 105717 108164 52863 54308 2.00 2.01<br />

N 1 : 160 kg<br />

ha -1<br />

N 1 : 200 kg<br />

ha -1<br />

N 1 : 240 kg<br />

ha -1<br />

Nitrogen levels<br />

79332 82119 30065 32601 1.61 1.65<br />

97151 97986 47388 47973 1.95 1.95<br />

100307 102162 50050 51654 1.99 2.02<br />

78 | Page Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

SEm± CD SEm± CD SEm± CD SEm± CD SEm± CD SEm± CD<br />

M 2246 7923 2455 8663 2246 7923 2455 8663 0.045 0.16 0.049 0.17<br />

N 596 1804 727 2200 596 1804 727 2200 0.012 0.04 0.015 0.04<br />

Mat N 2448 8441 2728 9363 2448 8441 2728 9363 0.049 0.17 0.055 0.19<br />

N at M 3890 8246 4253 9016 3890 8246 4253 9016 0.078 0.17 0.085 0.18<br />

(CD at P=0.05)<br />

Conclusion<br />

From the findings <strong>of</strong> the investigation, it can be concluded that scheduling irrigation by drip at<br />

0.9 IW/CPE ratio along with 240 kg N ha -1 is suitable combination for maximizing the yields<br />

<strong>of</strong> maize with higher WUE.<br />

References<br />

Krishnasamy, S., Mahendran, P.P., Gurusamy, A and Babu, R. 2012. Optimization <strong>of</strong> nutrients<br />

for hybrid maize under drip fertigation system. Madras Agric. J., 99(10-12): 799-802.<br />

T1-27P-1290<br />

Jalkund Low Cost Rain Water Harvesting and Utilization for Rabi Season<br />

Vegetable Production in Rabitar, Namchi District, Sikkim, India<br />

Indra Prashad Shivakoti, Basant Tamang, Nissi Gurung, Pravesh Shivakoty, Karma<br />

Peden Kaleon, Chewang Norbu Bhutia, Yangchenla Bhutia<br />

KVK, South Sikkim, Namchi District-737132, Sikkim<br />

kvknamthang@gmail.com<br />

Rain water harvesting has been practiced for many years in several regions globally and is<br />

mainly used for domestic or agricultural purposes. Various studies on rainwater harvesting in<br />

dry or tropical areas <strong>of</strong> growing and developing countries for agricultural use have proved its<br />

benefits such as an increase in crop yields and facilitated benefits to high-value crops. A lowcost<br />

technology for water harvesting structure Jalkund was demonstrated having dimensions<br />

5mx3mx1m was conducted at NICRA adopted village Rabitar, Namchi district, South Sikkim.<br />

The average supply from each Jalkund was about 15,000 L water. In the present study an<br />

approach to economical integrated ways <strong>of</strong> farming system was demonstrated to 10 numbers<br />

<strong>of</strong> farming families in the Village. The top most priority <strong>of</strong> the present study was to way out<br />

the source <strong>of</strong> water for meeting minimum critical water needs for post monsoon Rabi season<br />

vegetable production. Rainwater harvesting has great potential to achieve sustainable<br />

agriculture.<br />

Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance<br />

79 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

T1-28P-1321<br />

Economic Feasibility <strong>of</strong> Farm Ponds: A case study <strong>of</strong> Drainage Line<br />

Treatment Scheme in Wayanad District, Kerala<br />

S. Lokesh 1 , P. Indira Devi 2 , A. Prema 2 and C.A. Rama Rao 1<br />

1 ICAR- Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, Hyderabad – 500 059, Telangana<br />

2 Kerala Agricultural University Thrissur, Kerala<br />

The growing population and changes in the dietary habit <strong>of</strong> people are driving the growing<br />

demand for food crops. The agriculture industry is struggling to achieve the required<br />

production, as natural resources, viz., soil, water and biodiversity, are depleting over the<br />

decades. In addition to this, Climate Change is widening the demand-supply gap by triggering<br />

variations in temperature, weather, and increased pest and disease prevalence. Besides these,<br />

climate change is also hammering agriculture and food production with an increased<br />

probability <strong>of</strong> floods and drought occurrences. Floods are causing severe soil and water erosion,<br />

increased pest and disease incidences, and affect agricultural production. On the other hand,<br />

there were moderate to severe drought incidences, which affected crop sowing and agriculture<br />

production (Lokesh and Poddar, 2017). India is not different from this scenario. Various studies<br />

conducted in this regard have revealed that there would be an increased flood and drought<br />

occurrence in the country. The present study was conducted to understand the impact <strong>of</strong> farm<br />

ponds on crop yields and assess the Economic feasibility <strong>of</strong> the same. The study assumed that<br />

CRA technologies had impacted crop yield and the structures were economically viable.<br />

Methodology<br />

The study was conducted in the Wayanad District <strong>of</strong> Kerala, which was one <strong>of</strong> the most<br />

climate-affected Districts <strong>of</strong> the State (GoK, 2014). Multistage Random Sampling was used in<br />

the study to select the respondents, and the personal interview method was used to collect the<br />

information from the respondents. Ten farm pond beneficiaries in each village and a village in<br />

each block <strong>of</strong> the District were selected to make the total sample size 30. The percentage change<br />

method is used to analyze the changes in yield levels and the economic feasibility <strong>of</strong> the<br />

technologies tools like Net Present Worth (NPW), Internal Rate <strong>of</strong> Returns (IRR) and BC<br />

ratios.<br />

Net Present Value / Worth (NPV)<br />

Net present value (NPV) is the difference between the Present Value <strong>of</strong> cash inflows and the<br />

Present Value <strong>of</strong> cash outflows over time. It is mainly used to analyse the pr<strong>of</strong>itability <strong>of</strong> a new<br />

project. Project with positive NPV is worth considering, and ranking the projects based on the<br />

magnitude <strong>of</strong> NPV is also made. NPV also indicates the scale and volume <strong>of</strong> the project<br />

80 | Page Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

investments and returns. Projects with positive NPW are economically viable. It is estimated<br />

using the following equation<br />

NPV/W =<br />

P <br />

(1 + i) + P <br />

(1 + i) +. . . . . . . . . . . . . . + P <br />

(1 + i) <br />

where, P1…n = Net Cash flow in year n (Difference between cash outflows and inflows); i =<br />

Discount rate (9%); t = Time period (economic life <strong>of</strong> the Farm Pond based on respondents’<br />

opinion)<br />

Benefit – Cost Ratio (BC Ratio)<br />

It is the ratio <strong>of</strong> benefits and costs <strong>of</strong> a project expressed in monetary terms. It reflects the<br />

efficiency <strong>of</strong> the investment. BC ratio <strong>of</strong> more than one indicates the pr<strong>of</strong>itability <strong>of</strong> the project.<br />

The project is selected if the BC ratio is more than one. It is estimated using the following<br />

equation<br />

BC Ratio =<br />

∑<br />

∑<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

B <br />

(1 + i) <br />

C <br />

(1 + i) <br />

where, Bn = Benefits (Cash Inflows) received in year t; Ct = Costs (Cash Outflows) in year t ;<br />

I = rate <strong>of</strong> discount (9%); t = Time period (economic life <strong>of</strong> the Farm Pond based on<br />

respondents’ opinion); i = Discount rate<br />

Internal Rate <strong>of</strong> Return (IRR)<br />

Internal rate <strong>of</strong> return (IRR) is the discount rate at which NPV <strong>of</strong> net cash flows (NPV/W) from<br />

a project or investment equals zero, i.e. NPV/W=0. It is calculated by using the following<br />

formula.<br />

⎛<br />

⎜<br />

Lower discount Difference between<br />

IRR = + <br />

rate<br />

the two discount rates X ⎜<br />

⎜<br />

⎜<br />

⎝<br />

Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance<br />

Present worth <strong>of</strong><br />

the cash flow at<br />

the lower discount rate<br />

Absolute difference<br />

between the present<br />

worths <strong>of</strong> the cash flow<br />

at the two discount rates⎠<br />

IRR should be higher than the opportunity cost <strong>of</strong> capital for the project.<br />

Results<br />

Wayanad is a hilly District in Kerala, is dominated by homestead farming, and plantation crops<br />

are the major sources <strong>of</strong> income. The general cropping pattern <strong>of</strong> the respondents includes<br />

c<strong>of</strong>fee, pepper, rubber, banana, areca nut, ginger, turmeric and other crops. Results showed that<br />

in the post-adoption period <strong>of</strong> CRA technology, i.e. farm pond ginger (142.03%) gained the<br />

highest per cent area, it was followed by rubber (10.00%), c<strong>of</strong>fee (4.69%) and banana (4.40%).<br />

⎞<br />

⎟<br />

⎟<br />

⎟<br />

⎟<br />

81 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

In terms <strong>of</strong> productivity, arecanut has witnessed the highest productivity change, i.e. 107.56<br />

per cent, it was followed by c<strong>of</strong>fee (88.59%), pepper (56.08), cardamom (37.78) and banana<br />

(35.54%). Additional income received by the respondents was calculated using changes in farm<br />

production, multiplied by the market price. Additional income gained by the respondents was<br />

used as income flow to calculate the NPV, IRR and BC ratio. The farm ponds’ economic life<br />

was considered 25 years based on the respondents' opinion, and a nine per cent discount rate<br />

was used. On average, Rs. 4.65 lakh was invested (by both Government and Farmers) in each<br />

farm pond, and it would receive gross returns <strong>of</strong> Rs. 29.90 lakhs in its economic life.<br />

Conclusion<br />

The study concludes that implementing Climate Resilient Agriculture (CRS) technologies, viz.,<br />

farm ponds benefited the farmers at the micro level. It is equally important to note that farm<br />

ponds (CRA technology) fetched a better income than fixed investments at the banks which is<br />

indicated by higher IRR value. Thus, it is recommended that the CRA structures, viz., farm<br />

ponds and schemes like Drainage Line Treatment, can be extended further to other farmers <strong>of</strong><br />

different regions in the State and Country as it is helping in getting sustainable agriculture<br />

production.<br />

Reference<br />

GoK [Government <strong>of</strong> Kerala]. 2014. Kerala State Action Plan on Climate Change (Online).<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Environment and Climate Change, Government <strong>of</strong> Kerala. Available:<br />

https://envt.kerala.gov.in/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/Kerala-State-Action-Plan-on-<br />

Climate-Change-KSAPCC-2014-August.pdf. [27 th Oct. 2022]<br />

Lokesh, S. and Poddar, R.S. 2017. Impact <strong>of</strong> drought on water resources and agriculture in<br />

Karnataka. International J. Pure and Applied Biosci., 6 (2): 1102-1107.<br />

T1-29P-1322<br />

Optimum Sowing Window and Water Stress at Critical Stages on the Growth and<br />

Yield <strong>of</strong> Groundnut Crop- A Modeling Approach<br />

A.V. M. Subba Rao, Deepti Verma, V. P. Pramod, S. K. Bal and A. Suryachandra Rao 2<br />

1 All India Coordinated Research Project on Agrometeorology,<br />

ICAR-Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, Hyderabad, Telangana 500 009, India<br />

2 Indian Institute <strong>of</strong> Tropical Meteorology, Pune<br />

For optimization <strong>of</strong> crop yield, sowing at a suitable time to fit the crop growth period is critical.<br />

If the optimal planting window is determined, then the farmers can utilize the planting<br />

opportunity that occurs in that optimal planting window (Sulochana et al., 2002). Groundnut is<br />

one <strong>of</strong> the important oilseed crops having exceeding demand for its oil. The water requirement<br />

82 | Page Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

<strong>of</strong> the crop is an important phenomenon to estimate the crop yield and understand the crop<br />

water necessity at different crop phenological stages as water deficits cause yield reduction.<br />

Crop growth simulation models are used for the optimization <strong>of</strong> sowing window and crop water<br />

stress during different stages <strong>of</strong> a crop during the season. In groundnut, flowering, pegging,<br />

and pod formation stages are the important growth stages where water availability is much<br />

needed for a better crop. Rainfall is one <strong>of</strong> the major weather parameters playing a crucial role<br />

in groundnut crop growth and yield. Simulation models help to simulate the crop water stress<br />

<strong>of</strong> different crops. There is a thresh hold <strong>of</strong> above a specific value (50%) that impacts crop<br />

growth and development process. On the other hand, the water requirement <strong>of</strong> groundnut varies<br />

with the stages and is lowest from germination to flower formation and reaches a maximum<br />

during pod formation. During these stages, if stress persists, the performance <strong>of</strong> the crop goes<br />

into trouble. In view <strong>of</strong> the above, a study has been conducted using the DSSAT model to<br />

simulate, identify and quantify the water stress at different crop stages <strong>of</strong> the Kharif sown<br />

groundnut crop.<br />

Methodology<br />

Experimental groundnut crop and weather<br />

data were collected from AICRPAM<br />

Anantapuramu center on Groundnut<br />

growth parameters and yields from the<br />

years 2009-2019. Calibrated and validated<br />

DSSAT Peanut model for K-6 variety used<br />

for simulating groundnut crop for different<br />

planting dates (15-June, 22-June, 30-June,<br />

7 July, 21 July, 28 July, 04 August, 11<br />

August and 15 August) and yields during kharif period. Simulations <strong>of</strong> pod yield and other<br />

yield attributes using the calibrated model were found to be quite accurate. The simulated<br />

output files further processed to extract the crop water stress.<br />

Results<br />

The optimum sowing window for Kharif groundnut in the Anantapur region is mid-June to mid<br />

<strong>of</strong> July and can continue up to 31 July, after that it is late sowing and will get a low yield after<br />

sowing 31 July. The CROPGRO model has been calibrated and validated for rainfed groundnut<br />

for the years 2019 and 2020 at the Anantapur agricultural station. In the package <strong>of</strong> practices<br />

for high yields <strong>of</strong> groundnut (K-6) in the Anantapur region planting in mid-June–15-July is<br />

recommended. The patterns <strong>of</strong> variation <strong>of</strong> the simulated yield with planting date, for the 11<br />

years (2009-2019) are shown in the figure.<br />

Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance<br />

83 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Results showed that variation in the simulated yield obtained is affected by different sowing<br />

dates. The highest yield was obtained in<br />

crop sown during the first fortnight <strong>of</strong><br />

July. It may be due to no moisture stress<br />

coinciding with the critical stage <strong>of</strong> crops<br />

in crop sowing in this period. The critical<br />

stages identified are the vegetative stage,<br />

the flowering stage, the peg development<br />

and pod formation stage, and the pod<br />

filling stage (Nageswara Rao et al., 1985,<br />

1989). The crop sown in June has not<br />

received excess rainfall during the stage <strong>of</strong> vegetative growth and the initial dry spell after<br />

sowing helped in pr<strong>of</strong>use flowering and synchronized peg formation may cause in reducing<br />

yield.<br />

The crop sown from 7 July-22 July is identified as the optimum sowing date which can give<br />

maximum yield because the crop sown during this period received rains during the vegetative<br />

stage after sowing and not allowing the crop to undergo initial moisture stress which is good<br />

for groundnut for synchronize and produce flowering. Crop sown on normal sowing date gives<br />

maximum yield because there is less water stress found during critical stages <strong>of</strong> Kharif<br />

groundnut. The figure showed that the sowing date (15 June, 22 June, 30 June, 07 July, 15 July,<br />

22 July, 28 July, 04 August, and 15 August) is simulated using the DSSAT crop simulation<br />

model to estimate the crop water stress at different crop phenological stages. Maximum water<br />

stress was found in early sown June and late August sown crops in comparison to normal<br />

sowing time (7-Jul, 15 July, and 22 July), which coincides with critical stages <strong>of</strong> groundnut. In<br />

June sown crop, maximum water stress was found in the first flower to first seed stage i.e.,<br />

(>0.5) (50 %) and in the August sown crop maximum water stress was found > 0.5 (50%) in<br />

the first seed stage to physiological maturity. These stages are crucial for yield determination.<br />

Conclusion<br />

A crop sowing window is an important factor to understand the impact <strong>of</strong> crop growth and<br />

development. Rainfall plays a vital role for Kharif crops to supply water to the crops and soil<br />

moisture. For early sowing dates <strong>of</strong> June (15, 22, 30) and August (4, 11 15), late sowing <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Kharif groundnut crop shows high crop water stress during critical stages over the 2009-2019<br />

year.<br />

References<br />

Nageswara Rao, R. G., Singh, S., Sivakumar, M. V. K., 1985. Effect <strong>of</strong> water deficit at different<br />

growth phases <strong>of</strong> peanut I. yield responses. J. Agron. 77, 782–786.<br />

84 | Page Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Nageswara Rao, R. C., Williams, J. H., Sivakumar, M. V. K., Wadia, K. D. R., 1989. Effect <strong>of</strong><br />

water deficit at different growth phases <strong>of</strong> peanut II. Responses to drought during<br />

preflowering phase. J. Agron. 80, 431–438.<br />

Sulochana Gadgil, Seshagiri Rao, P. R., Narahari Rao, K. 2002. Agric Syst. 74, 431–457<br />

T1-30P-1327<br />

Effect <strong>of</strong> Super Absorbent Polymers (Hydrogel), Bioagent (Trichoderma)<br />

and Organic Manures in Water Management <strong>of</strong> Rainfed Wheat<br />

(Triticum aestivum) in Eastern Uttar Pradesh<br />

Sayoni Das 1 , Ombir Singh 1 , Sandeep Kumar 1 , Avijit Sen 2<br />

1<br />

CCR PG College, Muzaffarnagar, UP<br />

2 Institute <strong>of</strong> Agricultural Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh<br />

The greatest challenge to Indian agriculture in the twenty-first century appears to be water<br />

scarcity. According to estimates from the Central Water Commission, more than 54% <strong>of</strong> the<br />

nation is at risk <strong>of</strong> drought. India has 4% <strong>of</strong> the world's freshwater resources, with the<br />

agricultural sector using more than 85% <strong>of</strong> it. Water availability per person is steadily<br />

declining, which highlights the necessity <strong>of</strong> improving water use efficiency in agriculture. The<br />

usage <strong>of</strong> Super Absorbent Polymers (SAPs) has recently attracted a lot <strong>of</strong> interest for<br />

agricultural water management. These polymers have the ability to swell 350–500 times <strong>of</strong><br />

their own weight in deionized water, and they have the capacity to produce more with less<br />

water. Additionally, bioagents (Trichoderma), organic manures (FYM and compost) have the<br />

ability to release <strong>of</strong> nutrients from soil or increase organic matter content, thus improving water<br />

retention capacity and maintaining the health <strong>of</strong> the soil.<br />

Methodology<br />

The field experiment was conducted under Varanasi condition <strong>of</strong> eastern Uttar Pradesh during<br />

the rabi (winter) season <strong>of</strong> 2016-2017 at the Agricultural Research Farm, Institute <strong>of</strong><br />

Agricultural Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh (India). The soil <strong>of</strong><br />

the experimental field was sandy clay loam in texture with 0.35 % organic carbon. The<br />

experiment was laid out in randomized block design with 4 replications. HUW -510 variety <strong>of</strong><br />

wheat was selected for the experiment. The experiment comprised <strong>of</strong> 7 treatments <strong>of</strong> different<br />

combinations <strong>of</strong> hydrogel, Trichoderma, FYM, D18 Compost and recommended doses <strong>of</strong><br />

NPK.<br />

Results<br />

The maximum number <strong>of</strong> ear heads/running m was obtained with combined application <strong>of</strong> NPK<br />

+ FYM, which remained at par with FYM + Hydrogel + NPK and D 18 Compost + NPK, while<br />

Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance<br />

85 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

the lowest number <strong>of</strong> ear heads was found in combined application <strong>of</strong> D18 compost +<br />

Trichoderma + NPK. Again, that maximum number <strong>of</strong> grains/ear head was recorded with<br />

combined application <strong>of</strong> NPK + FYM, but remained at par with all other treatment except D 18<br />

compost + Trichoderma + NPK and NPK. Different treatments registered non- significant<br />

effects on test weight <strong>of</strong> rainfed wheat. The highest grain yield (19.33 q/ha) was obtained with<br />

combined application <strong>of</strong> NPK and FYM and remained significantly superior to D18 compost<br />

+Trichoderma + NPK and NPK. The highest straw yield (36.89 q/ha) was obtained in<br />

combined application <strong>of</strong> NPK + FYM, but it remained at par with D 18 Compost + NPK and D 18<br />

Compost + hydrogel + NPK. Even though no significant difference was observed in the harvest<br />

index due to different treatments, FYM +Hydrogel + NPK registered the highest harvest index.<br />

Treatment<br />

Number <strong>of</strong><br />

ear head/<br />

running m<br />

No. <strong>of</strong><br />

grains/<br />

ear head<br />

Test<br />

weight<br />

(g)<br />

Grain<br />

yield<br />

(q/ha)<br />

Straw<br />

yield<br />

(q/ha)<br />

Harvest<br />

index<br />

(%)<br />

FYM+NPK 55.75 36.20 33.31 19.33 36.89 34.31<br />

FYM+Trichoderma<br />

+NPK<br />

45.25 33.13 33.18 15.79 29.64 34.67<br />

FYM+Hydrogel+ NPK 53.50 35.48 33.30 16.64 28.58 37.03<br />

D 18 Compost+ NPK 48.50 34.60 33.25 16.44 30.26 35.17<br />

D 18Compost+<br />

Trichoderma+ NPK<br />

D 18Compost+<br />

Hydrogel+ NPK<br />

41.25 31.08 33.15 13.76 27.86 32.98<br />

47.25 33.75 33.21 16.37 32.33 33.29<br />

NPK 44.25 31.30 33.16 14.8 29.09 33.94<br />

SEm± 3.69 1.90 0.27 2.11 3.21 3.51<br />

CD (P=0.05) 7.77 3.99 NS 4.45 6.75 NS<br />

Conclusion<br />

Since combined application FYM and NPK was found to be more effective, it can be accepted<br />

to be more logical for adaption for water conservation in rainfed wheat. Being organic in nature,<br />

it promotes environmental sustainability also.<br />

Ratooning Sorghum for Agronomic Rainwater Management<br />

T1-31P-1334<br />

V. Maruthi, K.S. Reddy, V.K. Singh, P.K. Pankaj, K. Srinivas, B. Sanjeeva Reddy,<br />

A.G.K. Reddy, Ashish S. Dhimate, V. Visha Kumari and M. Mounika<br />

ICAR-Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, Hyderabad-59, Telangana State, India<br />

Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench) is mainly grown as a dual-purpose rainfed crop.<br />

During times <strong>of</strong> fodder scarcity, sorghum stover is <strong>of</strong> great consolation. However, eroded<br />

86 | Page Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

marginal soils produce a poor crop <strong>of</strong> sorghum, coupled with low market prices resulting in<br />

poor pr<strong>of</strong>its, thus, favored least by the farmers (Zalkuwi et al. 2015). Sorghum ratooning is one<br />

<strong>of</strong> the drought management practices tried earlier in rainfed areas, which could also be<br />

introduced and evaluated matching with the rainfall forecast. Not only does there seem to be a<br />

shift in rainfall distribution, but there may also be chances <strong>of</strong> receiving extra rain events beyond<br />

South West monsoon (SWM) season through the probability estimation. Horsegram<br />

(Macrotyloma uniflorum (Lam.) Verdc) is a contingent pulse crop grown mostly during late<br />

kharif/ early rabi for grain and fodder purposes as well.<br />

Methodology<br />

With the extra rain events beyond South West monsoon, chance cropping <strong>of</strong> a pulse horse gram<br />

(HG) can be considered for sowing in the harvested strips/rows <strong>of</strong> strip row Sorghum and<br />

pigeonpea intercropping as a sequence crop, and the harvested sorghum crop was<br />

ratooned. This practice was carried out mainly during October- November months when we<br />

receive rain. However ratooning sorghum does not need seeding while horse gram did so. The<br />

recommended dose <strong>of</strong> nitrogen was applied to the sorghum ratoon and recommended amount<br />

<strong>of</strong> nitrogen and phosphorus was to the horse gram crop. The first set <strong>of</strong> sorghum ratooned and<br />

horse gram were sole crops while the second set was carried out in a 4:4 strip row intercropping<br />

system <strong>of</strong> sorghum and pigeonpea. Rainfall received was 299 mm and 63 mm respectively<br />

during both types <strong>of</strong> years for post-monsoon.<br />

Results<br />

Ratoon sorghum performed better during well-distributed rainfall while deficit rainfall affected<br />

its performance. Compared to the performance <strong>of</strong> sequence horse gram sown after the harvest<br />

<strong>of</strong> sorghum crop, horse gram needs sowing rains, seed, seedbed preparation, and sowing costs.<br />

This needs to be followed by the receipt <strong>of</strong> good post-rainy season rain events for a successful<br />

horse gram crop.<br />

Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance<br />

87 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Performance <strong>of</strong> ratoon sorghum as compared to the sequence horse gram for capitalizing in on post<br />

monsoon rains<br />

Conclusion<br />

Ratoon sorghum could be one alternate option if we are unable to sow sequence horse gram<br />

due to the non-receipt <strong>of</strong> post-monsoon rains timely. Further ratoon sorghum requires only the<br />

application <strong>of</strong> nitrogenous fertilizers either as a foliar spray or as a placement in soil. Cutting<br />

heights and low management need to be standardized. Further in place <strong>of</strong> ratoonability, if<br />

tillering is promoted in sorghum might be a great help for fodder production as the fodder<br />

demand is rising.<br />

References<br />

Zalkuwi, J. and Singh, R. and Bhattarai, M. and Singh, O.P. and Rao, D. 2015. Analysis <strong>of</strong><br />

constraints influencing sorghum farmers using Garrett’s ranking technique; A<br />

Comparative study <strong>of</strong> India and Nigeria. Int. J.Scientific Res. Manage., 3(3): 2435-2440.<br />

T1-32P-1335<br />

Performance <strong>of</strong> Groundnut Under Micro Irrigation Methods, Schedules<br />

and Varied Fertilizer Doses<br />

K. Sathish Babu and Y. Padmalatha<br />

Agricultural Research Station, Garikapadu– 521175<br />

Acharya N.G. Ranga Agricultural University, Guntur, Andhra Pradesh, India<br />

Among nine oilseed crops grown in India, groundnut occupies premier position with 18.8 %<br />

and 20.7 % <strong>of</strong> total oilseeds area and production, respectively. Water and fertilizers are the<br />

most important management factors by which farmers can control the plant growth and yield,<br />

88 | Page Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

which helps to achieve sustained crop production. Thus, the use <strong>of</strong> micro irrigation system<br />

comprises drip and micro sprinkler system <strong>of</strong>fers a great degree <strong>of</strong> control over water and<br />

fertilizer application to meet the requirement <strong>of</strong> crops. Irrigation scheduling by these systems<br />

are usually based on water requirement <strong>of</strong> crop to maintain favourable soil water content in the<br />

root zone, that helps to achieve sustained growth and yield gains up to 100 per cent, water<br />

savings upto 40 to 80 per cent, and associated fertilizer, pesticide and labour savings over<br />

conventional irrigation systems. In recent years the water released from NSP left canal is<br />

reduced. Added to this, low groundwater recharges in the wells situated in the vicinity <strong>of</strong> NSP<br />

left canal command area warrants for growing <strong>of</strong> ID crops only. In view <strong>of</strong> the above, an<br />

investigation was undertaken to assess performance <strong>of</strong> groundnut under drip and micro<br />

sprinkler system with various doses <strong>of</strong> fertilizers comparison to the conventional system.<br />

Methodology<br />

A field experiment was conducted for two consecutive years during rabi 2018-19 and rabi<br />

2019-20 at Agricultural Research Station, Garikapadu, Krishna district, ANGRAU with the<br />

objective to identify the suitable micro irrigation method, schedule and fertilizer dose for rabi<br />

groundnut crop. The treatments consist <strong>of</strong> three methods <strong>of</strong> irrigation as main plots i.e.,<br />

sprinkler, drip irrigation and check basin methods with four fertilizer doses as subplots i.e., 100<br />

%, 75 %, 50 % RDF and soil test-based fertilizer application and three irrigation schedules i.e.,<br />

IW/CPE ratio <strong>of</strong> 1.0, 0.8 and 0.6 as sub-sub plots. The experiment was laid out in a split-split<br />

plot design and replicated thrice. Groundnut variety Kadiri 6 Irrigation schedules were given<br />

based on the pan evaporimeter readings located in ARS, Garikapadu premises and imposed the<br />

treatments with 10 mm irrigation from 30 DAS to 60 DAS and 15 mm irrigation from 61 DAS<br />

to maturity in drip method, 30 mm irrigation from 30 DAS to maturity in mini sprinkler method<br />

and 50 mm depth irrigation from 30 DAS to maturity in check basin method. Biometrical<br />

observations at harvest, yield attributes and field water use efficiency recorded as per defined<br />

procedures.<br />

Results<br />

The results (pooled for 2018-19 and 2019-20) were recorded on number <strong>of</strong> pods plant -1 ,<br />

hundred kernel weight (g), pod yield (kg ha -1 ) and field water use efficiency (kg ha -1 mm -1 ) are<br />

presented in Table 1. The number <strong>of</strong> pods plant -1 was significantly varied by irrigation<br />

schedules as well as interaction between methods <strong>of</strong> irrigation and fertilizer doses. Among<br />

irrigation schedules, IW/CPE ratios <strong>of</strong> 1.0 and 0.8 were comparable and significantly superior<br />

to IW/CPE ratio <strong>of</strong> 0.6. They were significantly lowest at IW/CPE ratio <strong>of</strong> 0.6 at all fertilizer<br />

doses. Irrigation methods and interactions between irrigation methods and fertilizer doses and<br />

interaction between all treatmental combinations have significantly influenced the pod yield <strong>of</strong><br />

groundnut. Among methods <strong>of</strong> irrigation, significantly highest pod yield was with drip method<br />

<strong>of</strong> irrigation (2079 kg ha -1 ). While, rainport mini sprinkler irrigation and check basin method<br />

Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance<br />

89 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

have recorded significantly comparable pod yields. Drip irrigation at 75% RDF (2206 kg ha -1 )<br />

and STBF (2119 kg ha -1 ) were comparable and recorded significantly highest pod yield. A<br />

combination <strong>of</strong> drip irrigation at IW/CPE ratio <strong>of</strong> 1.0 with STBF and drip irrigation at IW/CPE<br />

ratio <strong>of</strong> 0.6 with 75% RDF were at par with each other and recorded significantly highest pod<br />

yield. Apart from one pre-sowing irrigation (50 mm) and rainfall (25.0 mm), till maturity, 250,<br />

200 and 150 mm under check basin method; 220, 205 and 165 mm under drip method; 270,<br />

240 and 180 mm depth <strong>of</strong> irrigation under rainport mini sprinklers for irrigation schedules <strong>of</strong><br />

IW/CPE ratios 1.0, 0.75 and 0.5 respectively were given. Higher field water use efficiency was<br />

recorded with drip irrigation at IW/CPE 0.6 (8.6 kg ha -1 mm -1 ). Lowest field water use<br />

efficiency (5.2 kg ha -1 mm -1 ) was recorded with check basin method at IW/CPE 1.0. The higher<br />

water use efficienty noticed under drip irrigated treatment mainly owed to higher economic<br />

yield per unit, amount <strong>of</strong> water consumed by the crop (Mathukia et al., 2019).<br />

Conclusion<br />

Based on the two year experimentation results it was concluded that, groundnut can be<br />

cultivated during rabi season with significantly higher yield attributes and pod yield recorded<br />

significantly higher field water use efficiency was recorded with drip irrigation at IW/CPE 0.6<br />

(8.6 kg ha -1 mm -1 ), which is suitable for Krishna district <strong>of</strong> Andhra Pradesh.<br />

References<br />

Mathukia RK, Chhodavadia SK, Sagarka BK and Bhalu VB. 2019. Summer groundnut<br />

response to micro-irrigation and transient water stress. Research & Reviews: Journal<br />

<strong>of</strong> Crop Science and Technology, 8: 16-20.<br />

Effect <strong>of</strong> irrigation and fertilizer doses on yield attributes and pod yield <strong>of</strong><br />

Methods <strong>of</strong> irrigation (A)<br />

groundnut during rabi (Pooled data <strong>of</strong> 2018-19 & 2019-20)<br />

No. <strong>of</strong><br />

pods/plant<br />

100-kernel<br />

weight (g)<br />

Pod yield (kg<br />

ha -1 )<br />

Field water<br />

use efficiency<br />

(kg ha -1 mm -1 )<br />

Sprinkler irrigation 10.9 41.3 1814 6.7<br />

Drip irrigation 11.0 45.1 2079 8.6<br />

Check basin method 10.2 39.8 1769 5.2<br />

SE (m) 0.40 1.25 47.9 0.52<br />

CD (p=0.05%) 1.18 2.49 149 1.02<br />

Irrigation schedules (B)<br />

1.0 IW/CPE 11.1 40.4 1944 5.5<br />

0.8 IW/CPE 10.9 41.8 1927 7.2<br />

0.6 IW/CPE 9.9 39.7 1792 7.3<br />

SE (m) 0.52 1.20 42.9 0.42<br />

90 | Page Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

CD (p=0.05%) 1.08 2.38 152 1.24<br />

Fertilizer doses (C)<br />

100 % RDF 10.6 41.2 1891 5.8<br />

75 % RDF 10.8 40.3 2206 7.3<br />

50 % RDF 10.0 39.5 1863 7.2<br />

Soil test based fertilizer (STBF) 11.0 42.3 2119 7.4<br />

SE (m) 0.64 1.65 48.9 0.69<br />

CD (p=0.05%) 1.02 2.58 142 1.18<br />

Interactions<br />

AXB<br />

SE (m) 0.02 0.01 127 2.25<br />

CD (p=0.05%) NS NS NS NS<br />

BXC<br />

SE (m) 1.2 0.04 119 2.56<br />

CD (p=0.05%) NS NS NS NS<br />

AXBXC<br />

SE (m) 0.08 0.02 42.5 2.18<br />

CD (p=0.05%) NS NS 235 NS<br />

T1-33P-1357<br />

Water Harvesting Technologies for Enhancing Productivity <strong>of</strong> Rainfed<br />

Agriculture Contribute to Resilience<br />

K.V. Rao, B.V.S. Kiran*, J. V. N. S. Prasad, S. Kundu, Manoranjan Kumar,<br />

T. V. Prasad, K. Sammi Reddy and V. K. Singh<br />

ICAR-Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, Hyderabad, Telangana, India<br />

* sagalkiran94@gmail.com.<br />

Rainfed agro-ecosystems occupy a significant place in Indian agriculture which is a source <strong>of</strong><br />

millions <strong>of</strong> small holders. Out <strong>of</strong> 141 million ha <strong>of</strong> net sown area in the country, 80 million ha<br />

area is rainfed and will remain same for a foreseeable future (Srinivasarao et al., 2013). The<br />

impact <strong>of</strong> climate change and variability in the country on agricultural production is evident in<br />

the recent years. Rainfall and its distribution vary widely among the various agro ecosystems<br />

impacting the yields <strong>of</strong> crops. Droughts, floods, delayed onset <strong>of</strong> monsoons and prolonged dry<br />

spells are the major climatic vulnerabilities resulting the severe yield loss and affecting the<br />

sustainable livelihoods. Conservation <strong>of</strong> rainwater and its recycling is important for sustainable<br />

crop production in rainfed condition. The rainwater can be conserved either by in-situ or exsitu<br />

in natural or manmade structure for supplemental irrigation. Soil conservation is an<br />

important way to protect the productive lands.<br />

Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance<br />

91 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Methodology<br />

Participatory on-farm demonstrations were conducted on farmers’ fields during 2011-2021<br />

under the project “National Innovations in Climate Resilient Agriculture” (NICRA) which is<br />

operational at 151 village clusters. Villages were selected based on the risk proneness and it<br />

represents the overall climatic constraint <strong>of</strong> the district. During 2019, about 68 KVKs involved<br />

in TDC program have received the normal rainfall between 19 to -19 per cent than long period<br />

average (LPA), 26 KVKs received the deficit rainfall <strong>of</strong> -20 to -59 per cent, 20 KVKs received<br />

the excess rainfall between 20 to 60 per cent and 7 KVKs received large excess rainfall between<br />

65 to 102 per cent more than the normal kharif rainfall. The climate resilient techniques viz.,<br />

in-situ moisture conservation through conservation furrow, ridge and furrow, broad bed furrow,<br />

trench cum bunding and mulching were demonstrated at farmers’ field.<br />

Results<br />

The effect <strong>of</strong> water harvesting technologies on various crops are presented in Table 1. Data<br />

indicated that, check dams, farm ponds, percolation tanks, bore well recharge technologies in<br />

crops such as rice, maize, soybean, pigeonpea, cotton and wheat has increased the irrigated<br />

area and cropping intensification. By providing supplemental irrigation to kharif crops and pre<br />

sowing irrigation to rabi crops the yields were enhanced upto 112% and also augmented the<br />

ground water level increasing the water table upto 15-100% in various locations. In Hilly<br />

regions Jalkund was demonstrated to farmers to harvest the run<strong>of</strong>f and provide lifesaving<br />

irrigation to high value crops and increased crop diversification. The yield improvement<br />

obtained was more than 100% compared to farmers without jalkunds. In-situ approaches were<br />

also demonstrated at various locations, in low rainfall regions (


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

impounding water on the surface <strong>of</strong> the soil to increase the opportunity time for infiltration. In<br />

present study, it was observed that adoption <strong>of</strong> water harvesting technologies during deficient<br />

rainfall conditions benefitted by getting additional yield improvement <strong>of</strong> > 100% compared to<br />

farmers’ practice.<br />

References<br />

Singh, D. V., Vyas, A. K., Gupta, G. K., Ramteke, R. and Khan, I.R. 2011. Tractor drawn broad<br />

bed furrow seed drill machine to overcome moisture stress for soybean in Vertisols.<br />

Indian J. Agric. Sci. 81: 941-944.<br />

Srinivasa Rao Ch., Ravindra Chary G., Mishra, P K, Nagarjuna Kumar, R., Maruthi Sankar, G<br />

R, Venkateswarlu, B. and Sikka, A. K. 2013. Real time contingency Planning: Initial<br />

experiences from AICRPDA. AICRPDA, CRIDA, Hyderabad.<br />

Chary, R. G., Prasad, J. V. N. S., Osman, M., Ramana, D. B. V., Nagasree, K., Rejani, R.,<br />

Subbarao, A. V. M., Srinivas, I., Rama Rao, C. A., Prabhakar, M., Bhaskar, S., Singh, A.<br />

K. & Alagusundaram, K. (Editors). (2019). Technology Demonstrations: Enabling<br />

communities to cope with climate variability and to enhance adaptive capacity and<br />

resilience. National Innovations in Climate Resilient Agriculture (NICRA) Project,<br />

ICAR-Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, Hyderabad, Research<br />

Highlights, p121.<br />

Impact <strong>of</strong> water harvesting measures on yield improvement and ground water increase<br />

Intervention Crop % yield<br />

improvement<br />

Check dams<br />

Percolation tank<br />

Bore well recharge<br />

technology<br />

Farm pond<br />

Jalkunds<br />

Blackgram, sesamum,<br />

pearlnmillet, wheat<br />

Rice, maize, pigeonpea,<br />

sorghum<br />

Soybean, pigeonpea,<br />

cotton<br />

Tomato, soybean, cotton,<br />

groundnut, greengram<br />

Rice, maize, cabbage,<br />

cauliflower, tomato,<br />

capsicum, broccoli<br />

% ground water<br />

increase<br />

56-112 25-30<br />

20-32 15-24<br />

25-29 36<br />

21-80 100<br />

60-250 -<br />

Compartmental bunding Sorghum 94 -<br />

Trench cum bunding<br />

Groundnut, pigeonpea,<br />

maize, mango<br />

Upto 56 -<br />

Ridges and furrow Cowpea and Radish 17-32 -<br />

Land level and bunding Chickpea 18 -<br />

Conservation furrow Soybean 35 -<br />

Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance<br />

93 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Opening furrow after 30<br />

DAS<br />

Mulching with<br />

sugarcane trash<br />

Cotton 61 -<br />

Maize 45 -<br />

Contour bunding Chickpea 17 -<br />

Broad bed furrow Pigeonpea 25 -<br />

Broad bed furrow Soybean 58 -<br />

T1-34P-1358<br />

Performance Evaluation <strong>of</strong> Standard Performance Indicators <strong>of</strong> Telugu<br />

Ganga Project in Andhra Pradesh<br />

Ch. Murali Krishna * , M.V. Ramana, B. Ramana Murthy, N.V. Sarala and<br />

H.V. Hema Kumar<br />

Agricultural Research Station, Acharya NG Ranga Agricultural University, Anantapur, Andhra<br />

Pradesh,<br />

Sri Venkateswara Agricultural College, Tirupati,<br />

Agricultural Research Station, Perumallapalli, Tirupati, Andhra Pradesh.<br />

* muraliagengg@gmail.com<br />

Among different agricultural problems, water scarcity has been a growing global problem that<br />

is challenging sustainable development placing a few constraints on the production <strong>of</strong> enough<br />

food to meet the increasing food requirements. The population in India which is over a 1.2<br />

billion at present is projected to significantly increase to 1.4 billion by 2025. The National<br />

Water Policy envisaged that food grain production should increase to 350 million tons by 2025.<br />

Telugu Ganga Project (TGP) irrigation system is one <strong>of</strong> the major irrigation projects in south<br />

India. The irrigation system consists <strong>of</strong> an anicut on Krishna river starting at Srisailam, Kurnool<br />

district in Andhra Pradesh. The four commands were located in Chittoor, Nellore, Kurnool and<br />

Kadapa districts in Andhra Pradesh state (Narasimha et al., 2017). A study was conducted to<br />

assess the performance <strong>of</strong> four commands <strong>of</strong> Telugu Ganga Project in Andhra Pradesh using<br />

standard performance indicators viz., Equity, Uniformity, Irrigation intensity, Overall<br />

consumed ratio/efficiency, Adequacy, Yield (kg/ha), Yield (kg/m 3 ), Yield (kg/m 3 ) <strong>of</strong> Eto and<br />

Crop yield ratio. The values <strong>of</strong> performance indicators were derived for each command during<br />

2013 to 2019.<br />

94 | Page Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Yield (kg/ha)<br />

6000<br />

5500<br />

5000<br />

4500<br />

4000<br />

3500<br />

3000<br />

2500<br />

2000<br />

1500<br />

1000<br />

500<br />

0<br />

Chittoor Nellore Kurnool YSR Kadapa<br />

5552<br />

5214<br />

4459<br />

3914<br />

Chittoor Nellore Kurnool YSR Kadapa<br />

Methodology<br />

Indicator values <strong>of</strong> yield attained in different districts in TGP command during 2013 to 2019<br />

Ranking <strong>of</strong> different parameters in four districts<br />

Ranks were assigned to different parameters for their mean values over years for assessing their<br />

superiority in different districts. The rank sums <strong>of</strong> parameters are given in Table. The rank<br />

sums were separately derived for 2 categories <strong>of</strong> parameters, viz., RS1 and RS2. RS1 comprised<br />

<strong>of</strong> (i) Equity, (ii) Uniformity, (iii) Irrigation, (iv) Overall consumed ratio/Efficiency, (v)<br />

Adequacy, (vi) Yield and (vii) Crop yield ratio. RS2 comprised <strong>of</strong> (i) Gross area, (ii) Volume<br />

<strong>of</strong> water, (iii) Command area, (iv) Total Volume <strong>of</strong> water, (v) Water demand, (vi) Rf, (vii) Dp,<br />

(viii) Area and (ix) Research station yield (Bos et al.,1994). Rank sums <strong>of</strong> RS1 indicated that<br />

Nellore was superior with minimum rank sum <strong>of</strong> 14, followed by Kurnool with rank sum <strong>of</strong><br />

17, Kadapa with rank sum <strong>of</strong> 28, while Chittoor attained maximum rank sum <strong>of</strong> 31. Rank sums<br />

<strong>of</strong> RS2 indicated that Chittoor was superior with minimum rank sum <strong>of</strong> 14, followed by Nellore<br />

with rank sum <strong>of</strong> 16, Kurnool with rank sum <strong>of</strong> 19 and Kadapa with maximum rank sum <strong>of</strong> 20.<br />

The over-all rank sum indicated that Nellore was superior with minimum rank sum <strong>of</strong> 30,<br />

followed by Kurnool with rank sum <strong>of</strong> 36, Chittoor with rank sum <strong>of</strong> 45 and Kadapa with rank<br />

sum <strong>of</strong> 48 in the TGP command.<br />

Ranking <strong>of</strong> performance indicators in different districts under the TGP command<br />

Parameter Nellore Kurnool Chittoor Kadapa<br />

Equity (%) 3 4 2 1<br />

Uniformity (%) 3 4 2 1<br />

Irrigation intensity (%) 2 1 3 4<br />

Over-all consumed ratio/Efficiency (%) 2 1 3 3<br />

Adequacy (%) 3 2 1 4<br />

Yield (kg/ha) 1 3 2 4<br />

Crop yield ratio 2 4 1 3<br />

Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance<br />

95 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Gross area (acres) 1 3 4 2<br />

Volume <strong>of</strong> water (Mcum) 2 1 4 3<br />

Command area (acres) 1 2 4 3<br />

Total Volume <strong>of</strong> water (Mcum) 2 1 4 3<br />

Water demand (Mcum) 2 1 3 4<br />

Rf (Cum) 2 3 1 4<br />

Dp (Cum) 2 1 4 3<br />

Area (ha) 1 3 4 2<br />

Research station yield (kg/ha) 1 2 3 4<br />

RS1 14 17 31 28<br />

RS2 16 19 14 20<br />

Over-all rank sum 30 36 45 48<br />

Results<br />

Based on the study, we have assessed the superiority <strong>of</strong> performance <strong>of</strong> four commands <strong>of</strong><br />

Telugu Ganga Project in Chittoor, Nellore, Kurnool and Kadapa districts in Andhra Pradesh<br />

using standard performance indicators like Equity, Uniformity, Irrigation intensity, Overall<br />

consumed ratio/efficiency, Adequacy, Yield (kg/ha), Yield (kg/m 3 ), Yield (kg/m 3 ) <strong>of</strong> Eto and<br />

Crop yield ratio observed during 2013 to 2019. The indicators were assessed in two groups<br />

viz., RS1 and RS2 where RS1 comprised <strong>of</strong> (i) Equity, (ii) Uniformity, (iii) Irrigation, (iv)<br />

Over-all consumed ratio/Efficiency, (v) Adequacy, (vi) Yield and (vii) Crop yield ratio, while<br />

RS2 comprised <strong>of</strong> (i) Gross area, (ii) Volume <strong>of</strong> water, (iii) Command area, (iv) Total Volume<br />

<strong>of</strong> water, (v) Water demand, (vi) Rf, (vii) Dp, (viii) Area and (ix) Research station yield. Based<br />

on RS1 group <strong>of</strong> indicators, Nellore was superior with best performance for all indicators<br />

having lowest rank sum <strong>of</strong> 14. Kurnool command was the 2 nd best with rank sum <strong>of</strong> 17, while<br />

Kadapa and Chittoor had a rank sum <strong>of</strong> 28 and 31 respectively. Based on RS2 group, Chittoor<br />

was superior for all indicators with minimum rank sum <strong>of</strong> 14, followed by Nellore with 16,<br />

Kurnool with 19 and Kadapa with rank sum <strong>of</strong> 20. When we considered both groups, Nellore<br />

was superior with minimum rank sum <strong>of</strong> 30, followed by Kurnool, Chittoor and Kadapa with<br />

rank sum <strong>of</strong> 36, 45 and 48 respectively in the TGP command.<br />

References<br />

Bos, M.G., Murray, R.D.H., Merry, D., Jonson, H.G. and Snellers, W.B. 1994. Methodologies<br />

for assessing performance <strong>of</strong> irrigation and drainage management. Irrig. Drain. Syst.,<br />

7: 231-261.<br />

Narasimha, K., Girija, P., Ravi, S., and Suresh, M. 2017. Evaluate the cropping pattern in the<br />

command areas using satellite Remote sensing techniques <strong>of</strong> Godavari basin major<br />

irrigation projects. Int. J. Adv. Res. Publ., 5(7):1719-1725.<br />

96 | Page Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

T1-35 P-1384<br />

Catchment–Storage-Command Relationship for Increasing Water<br />

Productivity in Micro-Watershed <strong>of</strong> Raichur District<br />

R. H. Rajkumar* 1 , M.R. Umesh 1 , S.N. Bhatt 1 , M.S. Shirahatti 2 and G. Ravindra Chary 3<br />

1 AICRP on Dryland Agriculture, MARS, UAS, Raichur, Karnataka<br />

2 AICRP on Dryland Agriculture, RRS, Vijayapura, UASD, Karnataka<br />

3 AICRP on Dryland Agriculture, CRIDA, Hyderabad, Telangana State<br />

*halidoddiraju@gmail.com<br />

The long-term field experiment was conducted to find out the catchment–storage-command<br />

relationship for enhancing water productivity in micro catchment <strong>of</strong> UAS campus, Raichur. A<br />

square shaped (trapezoidal section) farm pond <strong>of</strong> size 18x18 m top width 10x10 m bottom width<br />

and2.70 m depth was excavated in the year 2017 in the dry land research plot at UAS, Raichur<br />

campus. The total capacity <strong>of</strong> the pond was 547.0 m 3 . The catchment and command area were<br />

delineated as 8 and 1 ha respectively. During the year 2020, 61 number <strong>of</strong> rainy days were<br />

recorded, <strong>of</strong> which, 19 numbers were run<strong>of</strong>f causing rainfall events as a result, the pond was<br />

filled and nine times and over flowed after exceeding its full capacity <strong>of</strong> 547.0 m 3 . This shows<br />

that, there is a scope to harvest more quantity <strong>of</strong> run<strong>of</strong>f water. Most <strong>of</strong> the run<strong>of</strong>f events were<br />

occurred during the month <strong>of</strong> May, June, July, August, September, and October. The May, June,<br />

July, August, September, and October months have received the rainfall <strong>of</strong> 130.4, 128.0, 296.6,<br />

164.4, 317.6, 179.6 mm respectively. Due to good rain in these months, the Pigeonpea crop<br />

during Kharif and groundnut crop during Rabi stand was good due to enough moisture in the<br />

soil pr<strong>of</strong>ile. The water balance <strong>of</strong> the pond revealed that 438.68 m 3 <strong>of</strong> water was lost through<br />

evaporation and seepage losses together during the period from 27-09-2020 to 24-03-2021 (6<br />

months). The remaining 108.32 m 3 <strong>of</strong> water which was available in the pond was used for<br />

supplemental irrigation to the groundnut crop with an irrigation depth <strong>of</strong> 1.08 cm for a 0.485 ha<br />

area which amounted to 109 m 3 <strong>of</strong> water. The irrigation was given on two days i.e on 25-03-<br />

2021 and 26-03-2021. The sediment yield was also calculated by collecting the run<strong>of</strong>f samples<br />

from the run<strong>of</strong>f events. The highest amount <strong>of</strong> sediment was recorded on 19-09-2021 which is<br />

0.35 t/ha against the rainfall <strong>of</strong> 83.6 mm and run<strong>of</strong>f volume <strong>of</strong> 1526.6 m 3 .<br />

Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance<br />

97 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

T1-36 P-1400<br />

Impact <strong>of</strong> Raising Bund Height Around Rice Field on Water Management,<br />

Growth, Yield and Economics<br />

Deokaran 1 , Ramkewal 1 , Mandhata Singh 1 , Ujjwal Kumar 1 , A Upadhyay 1 , Amrendra<br />

Kumar 1 , Anjani Kumar 1 , Hari Govid 2 and Arif Parvez 2<br />

1 ICAR-RCER, Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Lalganj, Buxar-802103, Bihar<br />

2 ICAR ATARI Zone-IV, Patna, Bihar-14<br />

The rice acreage <strong>of</strong> the world under irrigated, rainfed, upland and flood prone ecosystems are<br />

55%, 25%, 13% and 7%, respectively. Contribution <strong>of</strong> rice yield as percentage <strong>of</strong> global rice<br />

production from irrigated, rainfed, upland and flood prone ecosystems are 76%, 17%, 4% and<br />

3%, respectively (IRRI., 1993). The productivity <strong>of</strong> rainfed rice ecosystem is observed to be<br />

quite lower than that <strong>of</strong> the irrigated rice ecosystem, which emphasizes that assured irrigation<br />

water supply plays a crucial role in determining rice production. In rainfed ecosystem, the<br />

general tendency <strong>of</strong> the farmers are to store maximum rainwater in the cropped fields to combat<br />

moisture deficiency during dry spells due to lack <strong>of</strong> regular sources <strong>of</strong> irrigation water, This<br />

storage is achieved by strengthening the bund height. Water resource development has played<br />

an important role in livelihood improvement and poverty alleviation by improving food<br />

security, protecting against drought, providing access to water, and increasing cropped area. In<br />

rainfed rice ecosystem, conservation <strong>of</strong> rainwater to maximum extent can reduce<br />

the supplemental irrigation water requirement <strong>of</strong> the crop and drainage need <strong>of</strong> the catchment.<br />

Pre-monsoon, monsoon and post monsoon precipitation during rainy season causes sub surface<br />

soil erosion, nutrient depletion by run<strong>of</strong>f and sometimes flood situation and crop damage<br />

resulting which reduces production and productivity <strong>of</strong> soil. While on the other hand; scattered<br />

and uneven rainfall, long intervals in dry spell and rainy days, creates prolonged droughts<br />

situation during the crop growth period have become a common occurrence in previous years<br />

observations. The productivity <strong>of</strong> the rain-fed rice ecosystem is observed to be significantly<br />

lower than that <strong>of</strong> the irrigated rice ecosystem. This underlined that assured irrigation plays a<br />

crucial role to determining rice production. This storage is and can be achieved by<br />

strengthening the field bund height (raising bund height and its maintenance). The objective <strong>of</strong><br />

this study was to assessed the conservation <strong>of</strong> rainwater in rice fields through raising heights<br />

surrounding rice field.<br />

Methodology<br />

Case study was conducted for three consecutive years (2019–2021) under National Innovation<br />

onClimate Resilient Agriculture Project, NICRA –TDC at Krishi Vigyan Kendra Buxar,<br />

Adopted Village; Kukurah and Suroundha at 65 farmers field. The benchmark survey and<br />

participatory rural appraisal (PRA) technique were used for selection <strong>of</strong> participants and<br />

98 | Page Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

capacity building <strong>of</strong> farmers wereup skilled through training and experienced learning on<br />

conservation <strong>of</strong> rain water harvesting in rice field. The soil was loamy clay andhave deep<br />

percolation rate with Rice- Wheat cropping system. Technology demonstration component<br />

raising bund height (dimension 60x45x45 cm) have been demonstrated in 85.2 ha area <strong>of</strong><br />

leveled rice field at 65 farmers field <strong>of</strong> village and the rainfall were stored up to 35 cm weir<br />

height plots, the existing farmers practice was symbolic field bunds (unshaped, zigzag<br />

shapelump sum


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Conclusion<br />

The economics <strong>of</strong> demonstrated plot reveals that the net return is Rs 53780 ha -1 and the benefit<br />

cost ratio is 2.64. The average rain water 3750 m 3 ha -1 was stored during the crop season while<br />

the average rainfall was 934 mm. The area brought under rabi season were from 19.1 to 59.6<br />

ha in rabi 2018-19, 25.30 to 67.6 ha in 2019-20 and 27.65 to 120.1 ha in 2020-21 by using<br />

residual moisture. Keeping in view the aspects <strong>of</strong> conserving rainwater, sediment and nutrient<br />

and minimizing irrigation requirement, 30–45 cm <strong>of</strong> bund height is suitable for rice fields.<br />

T1-37 P-1416<br />

Performance <strong>of</strong> Land Shaping as a Climate Smart Model for the<br />

Sundarban<br />

P. K. Garain 1 , C. K. Mondal 1 , A. Saha 1 and F. H. Rahman 2<br />

1 Ramkrishna Ashram Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Nimpith, South 24 Parganas, West Bengal – 743338,<br />

India<br />

2 ICAR-Agricultural Technology Application Research Institute, Bhumi Vihar Complex, Block- GB,<br />

Sector- III, Salt Lake, Kolkata -700097, West Bengal, India<br />

Sundarban, the world’s largest contiguous stretch <strong>of</strong> mangrove forest, is highly vulnerable to<br />

tropical cyclones, tidal surges and erratic distribution <strong>of</strong> rainfall, leading to intensive rain spells<br />

and dry spells. The frequency <strong>of</strong> severe cyclonic storms is also increasing in the northern part<br />

<strong>of</strong> Bay <strong>of</strong> Bengal. The last two decades has witnessed seven severe cyclones - Sidr, Nargis,<br />

Bijli, Aila, Fani, Bulbul, Amphun and Yaas. High storm surge <strong>of</strong>ten breaches the river<br />

embankment, forcing saline river water to inundate the inland. Intensive rainfall within short<br />

period <strong>of</strong> time leads to prolonged submergence <strong>of</strong> the ill drained and low-lying crop fields<br />

where long duration and low yielding traditional rice varieties are the only option. The winter<br />

and summer seasons witness acute dearth <strong>of</strong> freshwater for irrigation, rendering huge areas to<br />

remain fallow. Such climatic vagaries add anguish to the livelihood <strong>of</strong> the 4.5 million people<br />

residing in the coastal Sundarbans, who primarily depend on agriculture and forest resources<br />

for their sustenance. Poor economic return from farming forces the population to migrate to the<br />

nearby towns, in search <strong>of</strong> alternate livelihood. To address such climatic vulnerabilities, a<br />

project titled “National Innovations on Climate Resilient Agriculture” (NICRA) was<br />

implemented by Ramkrishna Ashram Krishi Vigyan Kendra (RAKVK), in collaboration with<br />

Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture (ICAR-CRIDA), Hyderabad and<br />

Agricultural Technology Application Research Institute (ICAR-ATARI) Kolkata from 2011 to<br />

2021, in the cyclone prone villages <strong>of</strong> Sundarbans (NICRA News, 2011). The present study<br />

was aimed at comparing the performance <strong>of</strong> land shaping technology in the coastal Sundarbans<br />

situation, both during climate stress and normal weather condition, against the traditional<br />

farming practice.<br />

100 | Page Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Methodology<br />

The study was conducted in Bongheri village under the Kultali block <strong>of</strong> the South 24 Parganas<br />

district in West Bengal (Latitude: 22 o 2’3” N to 22 o 3’11” N; Longitude: 88 o 37’5” E to 88 o<br />

38’11” E).<br />

Land shaping and crop planning: One-fifth portion <strong>of</strong> a 0.26 ha plot was excavated to create<br />

a farm pond (0.05 ha). The excavated soil was used to raise the remaining plot upto 1-ft height<br />

and strengthen the land and pond embankments upto 3-ft height with a top width <strong>of</strong> 3 ft.<br />

Submergence tolerant and short duration (115 days) rice variety Ciherang sub-1 was grown on<br />

the elevated land (0.18 ha). Okra (0.01 ha), bittergourd (0.01 ha) and bottlegourd (0.01 ha)<br />

were planted on land and pond embankment during kharif (Table 1). In winter, brinjal and chilli<br />

were grown on the main field (0.15 ha) and land embankment (0.03 ha), respectively.<br />

Cucumber was grown (0.17 ha) in summer. Mixed fish farming was taken up in the pond (0.05<br />

ha).<br />

Farmers practice: Traditional rice variety Dudheswar was grown on 0.26 ha plot under<br />

medium land situation (1.5 ft water stagnation), during July to November. Lathyrus was sown<br />

as paira crop on 0.1 ha area.<br />

Data collection: 2019 was considered as “stress year” as it encountered two cyclones (Fani in<br />

May and Bulbul in November), intensive rainfall (120 mm and 94 mm), prolonged<br />

submergence after transplantation <strong>of</strong> rice (August), dry spells <strong>of</strong> more than 10 days (June and<br />

July), untimely rain (February and November) and 39% rainfall deficiency in kharif. The data<br />

<strong>of</strong> 2018 was taken as “normal year”. Both the practices (farmers practice and land shaping)<br />

were implemented in 15 farmers’ field <strong>of</strong> 0.26 ha size, separately.<br />

Results<br />

Land shaping <strong>of</strong>fered scope <strong>of</strong> multiple cropping to the farmers as the cropping intensity<br />

increased to 254%. The elevated terrain became suitable for growing short duration and HYV<br />

rice. The vegetables, grown on the raised embankment were saved from prolonged water<br />

stagnation during intensive rainfall. The pond rainwater was used for irrigation during dry<br />

spells in 2019 and sustaining fishery throughout the year. Assured irrigation also allowed to<br />

grow vegetables in winter and summer season. Both during a normal year and stressful weather,<br />

the average net income was significantly higher from the land shaping plot in comparison to<br />

farmers practice. Even after cyclone Bulbul (November, 2019) the land shaping farmers<br />

suffered a minimum crop loss due to timely harvest <strong>of</strong> their short duration rice and improved<br />

drainage. Such farmers could also take up rabi vegetable in time, whereas there was 25-30%<br />

loss <strong>of</strong> rice and 100% loss <strong>of</strong> lathyrus under farmers practice. Land shaping has been reported<br />

to maximize farm income, even during climatic hazards (Rahman et al., 2016).<br />

Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance<br />

101 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Interven<br />

tion<br />

Farmers<br />

practice<br />

(0.26 ha)<br />

Land<br />

shaping<br />

plot<br />

(0.26 ha)<br />

Production and economics <strong>of</strong> land shaping plot over farmers’ practice (Rs./ 0.26 ha/ year)<br />

Weat<br />

her<br />

Norm<br />

al<br />

year<br />

Stress<br />

year<br />

Norm<br />

al<br />

year<br />

Stress<br />

year<br />

Rice:<br />

6.84±0.06*<br />

Rice:<br />

5.55±0.13<br />

Production (q) in different season<br />

Kharif Rabi Summer<br />

Rice: 8.28±0.05<br />

Okra: 1.32±0.01<br />

Bitter gourd: 3.27±0.02<br />

Bottle gourd: 3.05±0.02<br />

Rice: 7.74±0.06<br />

Okra: 1.30±0.01<br />

Bitter gourd: 3.05±0.02<br />

Bottle gourd: 2.04±0.02<br />

Lathyrus:<br />

0.36±0.01<br />

Lathyrus:<br />

total crop<br />

loss<br />

Brinjal:<br />

47.70±0.43<br />

Chilli:<br />

3.12±0.04<br />

Fish: 1.50±0.01 (year-round)<br />

Brinjal:<br />

43.08±0.32<br />

Chilli:<br />

2.71±0.03<br />

Fish: 1.42±0.01 (year-round)<br />

Fallow<br />

Fallow<br />

Cucumber:<br />

18.58±0.24<br />

Cucumber:<br />

13.42±0.16<br />

Cost <strong>of</strong><br />

cultiva<br />

tion<br />

Gross<br />

return<br />

Net<br />

return<br />

B:C<br />

ratio<br />

6272±4<br />

1 a 13377±1<br />

16 b 7105±13<br />

9 b 2.13<br />

6015±3<br />

5 a 9990±22<br />

8 a 3975±21<br />

8 a 1.66<br />

50051±<br />

106 b 143130±<br />

891 d 93079±9<br />

31 d 2.92<br />

54420±<br />

150 c 126157±<br />

566 c 71738±5<br />

83 c 2.32<br />

SEm (±) 95.75 529.98 537.49<br />

CD (p=0.05) 273.29 1512.56 1534.01<br />

* Data represents mean <strong>of</strong> 15 observations ± standard error; abcd Data superscripted with same<br />

alphabets within a column are not significantly different at p≤0.05 on the basis <strong>of</strong> Tukey’s HSD<br />

Conclusion<br />

Land shaping technology is an effective climate resilient technology for the coastal Sundarbans<br />

farming situation. It not only provides additional income to the farm family but also engages<br />

the family members in farming, throughout the year, thus reducing chance <strong>of</strong> migration.<br />

References<br />

NICRA News. 2011. Land shaping to alleviate Aila effects, Nimpith, South 24 Parganas, West<br />

Bengal, Monthly e-Newsletter on Climate Resilient Agriculture, Pub. by CRIDA,<br />

Hyderabad, 1(3): 7.<br />

Rahman, F.H., Ghosh, D., Das, K.S., Mondal, S.K., Pal, P.P. and Roy, S.K. 2016. Monocropped<br />

fallow lowlands converted to multiple cropping options, In: NICRA<br />

Newsletter: Towards Climate Smart Agriculture, Pub. by ICAR-ATARI Kolkata, 2(2): 7.<br />

102 | Page Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

T1-38 P-1424<br />

Irrigation Requirement <strong>of</strong> Different Crops <strong>of</strong> Krishna Basin Under<br />

Changing Climatic Scenarios<br />

D. Kalyana Srinivas, R. Rejani, G.S. Pratyusha Kranthi, K.V. Rao and S. Deepika<br />

ICAR- Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, Hyderabad-500059<br />

Indian agriculture is severely affected by climate change due to increased crop water<br />

requirement and decreased availability <strong>of</strong> water, particularly in drylands (Behera et al., 2016).<br />

The rise in surface temperature increases the evaporation rates, influences the precipitation,<br />

leads to extreme events and affects the soil moisture. Human activities, along with increased<br />

evapotranspiration and decreases in precipitation, have resulted in desertification in some<br />

drylands. The prolonged dry spell in rainfed areas reduces the growing period and crop<br />

productivity by causing water stress. Irrigation is the efficient usage <strong>of</strong> fresh water, and with<br />

the growing scarcity <strong>of</strong> this essential natural resource, it is becoming increasingly important to<br />

maximize efficiency <strong>of</strong> water usage. It implies accurate management <strong>of</strong> irrigation and control<br />

<strong>of</strong> application depths in order to apply water effectively according to crop needs. Assessing<br />

irrigation and agriculture potential is an important activity in successful agriculture<br />

management.<br />

Methodology<br />

The study area covers parts <strong>of</strong> four large states namely, Karnataka, Maharashtra, Andhra<br />

Pradesh and Telangana with a geographical area <strong>of</strong> 258,000 km 2 (nearly 8% <strong>of</strong> India). The<br />

basin has a maximum length and width <strong>of</strong> about 701 km and 672 km and lies between 73°17'<br />

to 81°9' east longitudes and 13°10' to 19°22' north latitudes. Most <strong>of</strong> the basin is relatively flat<br />

and 90% lies below 750 m elevation. However, elevations in the Western Ghats reach up to<br />

1,900 m. Soils in the basin are generally shallow and clayey, with some areas <strong>of</strong> gravelly clay<br />

and loam. Soil types (based on the Soil Taxonomy classification system, NRCS 1999) include<br />

Entisols and Vertisols (black cotton soils) in the west and Alfisols (red soils) in the south and<br />

east. Soils tend to be deeper in valley bottoms and are deeper on average in Andhra Pradesh.<br />

The average annual rainfall <strong>of</strong> the basin is 784 mm. Dry spells are commonly experienced<br />

during July, August and September which concur with the vegetative or prolific stages <strong>of</strong> major<br />

rainfed crops which in turn affects the crop yield drastically. It is possible to increase the yield<br />

<strong>of</strong> pigeon pea, kharif maize, rabi maize and groundnut crops, by providing supplemental<br />

irrigations during critical growth stages significantly. To ensure the long-term sustainability <strong>of</strong><br />

these crops, an attempt is made to find the irrigation water requirement <strong>of</strong> these crops <strong>of</strong><br />

Krishna basin spatially for present and future scenarios.<br />

Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance<br />

103 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Results<br />

Site specific irrigation requirement <strong>of</strong> major crops was determined based on data availability<br />

for future scenarios, Hargreaves and Samani (1985) method was used instead <strong>of</strong> FAO Penman-<br />

Monteith method (Allen et al., 1998) for ETo calculation. Crop water requirement was<br />

estimated for pigeon pea, kharif maize, rabi maize and groundnut. The ensemble data <strong>of</strong> CMIP<br />

5.0 corresponding to two emission scenarios RCP 4.5 and RCP 6.0 was used. During the base<br />

line period, the irrigation requirement <strong>of</strong> pigeon pea, kharif maize, rabi maize and groundnut<br />

varied spatially from 87.9 mm to 267.2 mm, 32.7 mm to 189.9 mm, 306.1 mm to 373.6 mm,<br />

and 28.4 mm to 155.7 mm respectively, by 2030s under RCP 4.5, for pigeon pea, kharif maize,<br />

rabi maize and groundnut, it is expected to vary from -10.7 to 7.6 %, -29.8 to 17.5%, 1.5 to 3.6<br />

% and -5.9 to 3.0 % respectively. For RCP 6.0, for pigeon pea, kharif maize, rabi maize and<br />

groundnut, it is expected to vary from -9.3 to 12.7 %, -28.3 to 17.9%, 1.2 to 3.5 % and -4.2 to<br />

3.5 % respectively. According to the results, climate change has a considerable impact on the<br />

sustainability <strong>of</strong> the prevailing cropping system in Krishna Basin.<br />

104 | Page Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Variation in the irrigation requirement <strong>of</strong> pigeon pea, kharif maize, rabi maize and groundnut at<br />

Krishna basin under RCP 4.5 and 6.0 (2030s)<br />

Conclusion<br />

The irrigation requirement predicted for pigeon pea, kharif maize, rabi maize and groundnut<br />

are varying substantially at Krishna Basin in coming years’/future scenarios. Due to the<br />

significant spatial variation in irrigation requirements <strong>of</strong> major crops, irrigation scheduling at<br />

sites in the Krishna basin needs to be site-specific irrigation scheduling. From this study, it<br />

was concluded that in future, the basin requires site specific water policy changes to ensure<br />

the constant sustainability <strong>of</strong> crops.<br />

References<br />

Allen RG, Pereira LS, Raes D and Smith M. 1998. Crop Evapotranspiration-Guidelines for<br />

computing crop water requirements. FAO Irrigation and drainage paper 56. FAO,<br />

Rome, 300 (9): D05109.<br />

Behera S, Khare D, Mishra PK and Sahoo S. 2016. Impact <strong>of</strong> climate change on crop water<br />

requirement for Sunei medium irrigation project, Odisha, India. International Journal<br />

<strong>of</strong> Engineering Trends and Technology, 34 (8): 358-367.<br />

Hargreaves GH and Samani ZA. 1985. Reference crop evapotranspiration from temperature.<br />

Applied Engineering Agricultural, 1 (2): 96-99.<br />

Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance<br />

105 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

DK and Sarangi A. (2015). Strategies for climate change impacts on irrigated crops in<br />

National Capital Region <strong>of</strong> India. Journal <strong>of</strong> Applied and Natural Sciences, 7 (1): 388-<br />

393.<br />

Rejani R, Rao KV, Shirahatti MS, Surakod VS, Yogitha P, Chary GR, Gopinath KA, Osman<br />

M, Sammi Reddy K and Srinivasa Rao Ch. 2016. Irrigation requirement <strong>of</strong> crops under<br />

changing climatic scenarios in a semi-arid region <strong>of</strong> Northern Karnataka. Indian<br />

Journal <strong>of</strong> Dryland Agricultural Research & Development, 31 (2): 51-60.<br />

Impact <strong>of</strong> Borewell Recharging Structures in NICRA Village<br />

G. Hiregoudar, N.H. Bhandi, Gururaj Kombali<br />

ICAR-K.H.Patil Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Hulkoti, Gadag<br />

T1-39 P-1430<br />

Gadag district is one <strong>of</strong> the drought-prone districts that comes under the agro-climatic zone <strong>of</strong><br />

Northern Dry Zone-3 and Region-2 <strong>of</strong> Karnataka State. The climate <strong>of</strong> the district is semi-arid<br />

and annual rainfall <strong>of</strong> the district is 641 mm. Rainfall is usually erratic and the probability <strong>of</strong><br />

agriculture drought is to the extent <strong>of</strong> 70 percent <strong>of</strong> the year. Long dry spells between two rains<br />

during June to September affects the crop yield and thereby the livelihood <strong>of</strong> the farmers. Out<br />

<strong>of</strong> 10 years rainfall cycle, farmers face 7 years <strong>of</strong> agricultural drought. Nearly, 30 percent <strong>of</strong><br />

the district soil type is red sandy loam. In the district, 12 to 15 percent area is under irrigation<br />

which too in Malaprabha Command Area in the Naragund block. The remaining 6 blocks <strong>of</strong><br />

the district are under rainfed. Farmers mainly cultivate greengram, groundnut, Bt. cotton and<br />

maize crops in kharif season, sorghum and bengalgram crops in rabi season. The crops are<br />

non-remunerative due to moisture stress during agricultural drought years. Mahalingapur<br />

cluster <strong>of</strong> villages comprising <strong>of</strong> Mahalingapur, Nabhapur, Kabalayatakatti and Beladhadi are<br />

tribal hamlets located in Kappatagudda hill terrain <strong>of</strong> the district. These villages are not an<br />

exception to climate vulnerability. Frequent occurrence <strong>of</strong> early, mid and terminal drought in<br />

kharif season has severely affected the productivity <strong>of</strong> field crops. The cluster village<br />

Mahalingapur is adopted by ICAR-KVK, Gadag since 2015-16 under the project “National<br />

Innovations in Climate Resilient Agriculture (NICRA)” with the support <strong>of</strong> Indian Council <strong>of</strong><br />

Agricultural Research, New Delhi. The relevant climate resilient technologies have been<br />

implemented in these cluster villages. Under the Natural Resource Management, bore well<br />

recharging technology has been adapted for 17 numbers <strong>of</strong> bore wells covering 17 farmers<br />

during 2017 in the project village. This bore well recharging technology has resulted in good<br />

impact on increase in area under protective irrigation in the village from 2018 to 2021.In a span<br />

<strong>of</strong> 4 years (2018 to 2021), village received 74 mm run-<strong>of</strong>f causing rains, which helped to<br />

harvest excess run <strong>of</strong>f rain water and intern recharging <strong>of</strong> ground water through these bore<br />

wells.<br />

106 | Page Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Total 229 lakhs liters <strong>of</strong> water is harvested that resulted in rise <strong>of</strong> ground water table upto 8.9<br />

meters. This in turn helped to increase area under protective irrigation in kharif (26.60<br />

hectares), rabi (19.80 hectares) and summer (11.20 hectares) seasons.<br />

In this protective irrigated area various crops are cultivated. Totally in four years period,<br />

different crops like maize, rabi sorghum and bengalgram crops are cultivated in 101.40<br />

hectares area in kharif and 72.60 hectares area in rabi season. Protective irrigation provided<br />

from the recharged bore well resulted in increase in yield and net returns <strong>of</strong> different crops.<br />

There was a significant increase in yield <strong>of</strong> various crops from 34.08 to 54.94 percent and net<br />

returns <strong>of</strong> Rs.5,116/- to Rs.16,679/- per hectare. An additional return <strong>of</strong> Rs.19.96 lakhs returns<br />

was gained by the farmers during 2018 to 2021. Hence, the recharging <strong>of</strong> bore wells is very<br />

important in the rainfed area to enhance the economic status <strong>of</strong> the farmers even during climatic<br />

variations.<br />

T1-40 P-1432<br />

Recycling <strong>of</strong> Harvested Rainwater through Farm Pond to Enhance<br />

Productivity <strong>of</strong> rabi Crops under Semi-Arid Region<br />

J.K. Balyan, Manjeet Singh 2 and R.K. Sharma 3<br />

1,3<br />

Dryland Farming Research Station, Arjia, Bhilwara,<br />

2<br />

College <strong>of</strong> Technology and Agriculture Engineering, Udaipur<br />

Maharana Pratap University <strong>of</strong> Agriculture and Technology, Udaipur (Rajasthan)<br />

A field experiment was conducted during rabi season 2016-17 to 2019-2020 in Inceptisol to<br />

explore the possibilities rainwater harvesting and recycling for the purpose <strong>of</strong> raising rabi crops<br />

to enhance the crop productivity and water productivity <strong>of</strong> Nadi system in semi-arid areas under<br />

All India Coordinated Research Development Project at Dryland Farming Research Station<br />

(Maharana Pratap University <strong>of</strong> Agriculture and Technology, Udaipur), Arjia, Bhilwara<br />

(Latitude 24”20’N and 74”40’ Longitude and 432 meter above sea level), Rajasthan. The site<br />

soils <strong>of</strong> experimental field were sandy clay loam in texture having pH 8.11, organic carbon<br />

0.42%, E.C. 0.44 dSm-1, bulk density1.51 gm cc -1 , the available N, P2O5 and K2O in soils were<br />

243.56,21.52 and 416.27 kg ha -1 , respectively. The field capacity and permanent wilting point<br />

moisture <strong>of</strong> surface soil layer was 21.4 and 9.2% on weight basis, respectively. There were<br />

three main plot treatments <strong>of</strong> crops as C 1-Lentil, C 2-Chickpea and C 3-Mustard and three in sub<br />

treatment <strong>of</strong> irrigation methods such as I0- Control (conserved moisture), I1- One irrigation at<br />

45 DAS and I 2- Two irrigation at 45 & 60 DAS. These treatments were laid out in Split plot<br />

design with three replications. Among the different crops, lentil crop gave 162% higher mean<br />

mustard seed equivalent yield (1765 kg ha -1 ) in comparison to linseed (672 kg ha -1 ). However,<br />

application <strong>of</strong> supplemental irrigation at 45 DAS and 45 & 60 DAS was increased mean<br />

Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance<br />

107 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

mustard seed equivalent yield and recorded 63 and 91% higher over no irrigation (857 kg ha -<br />

1<br />

), respectively. Similarly, among the different crops, lentil crop obtained highest net returns<br />

(Rs. 56359.00 ha -1 ), benefit cost ratio (3.37) and water use efficiency (1.775 kg seed Cum -1 ).<br />

Further, application <strong>of</strong> one supplemental irrigation at 45 DAS was recorded higher WUE (1.377<br />

kg seed cum -1 ) as compared to two supplemental irrigations at 45 DAS & 60 DAS (0.944 kg<br />

seed Cum -1 ) but higher soil moisture content was recorded under two supplemental irrigations<br />

at 45 DAS & 60 DAS at all the three depth in all three crops at harvest in comparison to one<br />

irrigation and control. This might be attributed to that increase in mustard seed equivalent is<br />

not in proportion to the amount <strong>of</strong> supplement irrigation water. Therefore, it may be concluded<br />

that growing <strong>of</strong> lentil crop during rabi season with one supplemental irrigation at 45 DAS is<br />

more beneficial to get the higher production in semi-arid regions.<br />

References<br />

M.L. Jat, J.K. Balyan, Vuivek Kumar, Y.S. Rathi, R. Charry and S. Ojha. 2018. Feasibility <strong>of</strong> farm pond<br />

and recycling system to enhance productivity <strong>of</strong> rabi crops under semi-arid regions. Ind. J. Soil<br />

conserve 46 (1): 60-67.<br />

Jat M.L., Balyan J.K., Sammauria R. 2010. Effect <strong>of</strong> in-situ moisture conservation practices on<br />

productivity and economics under maize+blackgram cropping system in semi-arid region. Ind.<br />

Soil. conserv. 38 (1): 59-61.<br />

T1-41P-1449<br />

Rain Water Harvesting Technology, Jalkund - A Boon for Far Flung Hilly<br />

Farmers Under NICRA<br />

R. Lalrambeiseia, Henry Saplalrinliana, F. Lalthasanga<br />

Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Hnahthial, Lunglei District, Mizoram - 796571<br />

Hnahthial village <strong>of</strong> Lunglei District has a total geographical area <strong>of</strong> about 16 sq km. The<br />

average annual rainfall is about 2000mm.The village receives high rainfall but lacks rain water<br />

harvesting structures and management leading to severe water scarcity, particularly during the<br />

post monsoon season (November -April). Rainwater storage and harmonious Water Use<br />

Efficiency (WUE) are the key to sustainable livelihood in the village. Under NICRA Project,<br />

KVK Lunglei demonstrated 75 numbers <strong>of</strong> low-cost rain water harvesting technology<br />

‘Jalkund’ in NICRA adopted village and its adjoining villages. The low-cost material like<br />

Polyethylene pond liners (200 GSM) was used to construct pond generally with a size <strong>of</strong><br />

5x4x1.5m. The storage capacity <strong>of</strong> these tanks is in the range <strong>of</strong> 30000L 3 . Construction <strong>of</strong><br />

Jalkund and recycling <strong>of</strong> water through this system increase the productivity <strong>of</strong> the farmers<br />

by diversifying farming system like crop and livestock. As noticed in Hnahthial and its<br />

satellite villages, Jalkund technology had uncountable big and small impacts on the livelihood<br />

<strong>of</strong> the farmers.<br />

108 | Page Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

T1-42 P-1462<br />

In-Situ Moisture Conservation and Natural Nitrification Inhibitors for<br />

Adaptation and Mitigation <strong>of</strong> Climate Change in Semi-Arid Rainfed<br />

Regions<br />

G.Pratibha*, K.V.Rao, I.Srinivas, A.K.Indoria, Sumanta Kundu, M.Srinivasa Rao,<br />

Shivakumar A, K.Srinivasa Rao, M.Prabhakar, B.M.K.Raju, K.Sammi Reddy and<br />

V.K.Singh<br />

Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, Hyderabad, Telangana, 500059, India<br />

*G.Pratibha@icar.gov.in<br />

The rainfed regions are characterised by frequent dry spells and uneven distribution <strong>of</strong> rainfall,<br />

during cropping season. The dry spells <strong>of</strong> two weeks or more may occur after seed<br />

germination, or during different growth stages <strong>of</strong> crop and this result in moisture stress<br />

conditions leading to decline in crop productivity and may also sometimes cause total crop<br />

failure. Therefore, for the sustainable production requires adoption <strong>of</strong> location specific in-situ<br />

soil moisture conservation technologies are need <strong>of</strong> the hour. In addition to moisture stress,<br />

low nitrogen use efficiency are also the main causes for low yields in the rainfed farming.<br />

Nitrogen (N) is an essential nutrient and a limiting factor for plant growth in most soils. The<br />

rising human population, especially in developing countries, has led to agricultural<br />

intensification with a high input <strong>of</strong> reactive N from chemical fertilizers. But the nitrogen use<br />

efficiency was low in general and in rainfed regions in particular. Improper time <strong>of</strong> application<br />

<strong>of</strong> nitrogen fertilizer results in low nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) and gaseous losses <strong>of</strong> nitrous<br />

oxide (N 2 O) and ammonia (NH 3 ). Nitrous oxide is a potent greenhouse gas (GHG) with global<br />

warming potential <strong>of</strong> 298 times greater than CO 2 emission. Nitrification and denitrification<br />

are the major biological processes responsible for N2O production. N 2 O levels in the<br />

atmosphere are raising at an alarming rate and are likely to quadruple by 2050. Hence suitable<br />

measures are required to reduce such emissions and increase the nitrogen fertilizer use<br />

efficiency. Arresting nitrification could be an important strategy to improve nitrogen (N)<br />

recovery and agronomic N use efficiency where the loss <strong>of</strong> N is significant and leads to<br />

environmental pollution. Nitrification inhibitor could lower N 2 O emission and increase the<br />

crop productivity by reducing nitrification rate and increasing NUE through enhanced NH + 4<br />

uptake. Though chemicals known to inhibit nitrifies and have been tested, but many <strong>of</strong> these<br />

chemicals use is not practical because <strong>of</strong> their high cost, limited availability, negative impact<br />

on beneficial soil microorganisms, and above all, poor extension and promotional activities<br />

are major constraints in this respect. Therefore, it is essential to develop plant-based<br />

nitrification inhibitors (natural nitrification inhibitors, NNI) for augmenting nitrogen use<br />

efficiency, crop productivity, and for safe guarding the environment. The advantages <strong>of</strong> NNI<br />

Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance<br />

109 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

are that they are easily available, cheap, and eco-friendly. These nitrification inhibitors can be<br />

coated to urea by the farmers. Keeping in this view, an experiment was initiated in maize-<br />

castor cropping to develop strategies for enhancing adaption and mitigation <strong>of</strong> climate change.<br />

Methodology<br />

Field experiments were conducted in maize-castor annual rotation during 2012-2017 at<br />

Gunegal Research Farm (GRF) <strong>of</strong> the Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture<br />

(CRIDA), Hyderabad, India (17◦23′N latitude, 78◦29′E longitude, altitude 540 m above mean<br />

sea level) in the semi-arid region <strong>of</strong> Southern part <strong>of</strong> India. Average seasonal (June–January)<br />

rainfall during the experimental season was 510 mm, which accounts for approximately 42%<br />

<strong>of</strong> annual potential evapo-transpiration. The soil at the experimental site represents Typic<br />

Haplustalf. The arable part <strong>of</strong> the soil consists <strong>of</strong> 71.10% sand, 6.30% silt and 22.60% clay.<br />

The experiment was laid out in split plot design with three replications. The treatments<br />

comprised <strong>of</strong> flat sowing, conservation furrow and tank silt application in main plots. The<br />

conservation furrow was made between the crop rows at the time <strong>of</strong> sowing with the<br />

implement fabricated at ICAR-CRIDA. This implement used for sowing, fertilizer application<br />

and conservation furrow at a time. Urea treated with natural plant products to retard<br />

nitrification <strong>of</strong> urea were taken as sub plots. The different natural nitrification inhibitors tested<br />

were neem cake, Karanj cake, Vitex leaf powder these were compared with FYM, un coated<br />

urea. The test crops were cultivated with all the recommended package <strong>of</strong> practices.<br />

Recommended dose <strong>of</strong> other fertilizer (P and K) was applied uniformly in all the treatments.<br />

Results<br />

In this study the different in-situ moisture conservation practices and nitrification inhibitors<br />

significantly influenced the yield and GHG emissions. It was also observed that differential<br />

impact <strong>of</strong> these practices on yield and N 2O emissions were observed in different years due<br />

inter annual variation <strong>of</strong> rainfall. Among the three moisture conservation treatments,<br />

conservation furrow recorded higher maize equivalent seed yield as compared to normal<br />

sowing and tank silt application. The yield increase ranged between 38 to 11 %. The yield<br />

improvement in in situ moisture conservation was higher in low rainfall years. Tank silt<br />

application recorded higher yield over normal sowing whereas tank silt application recorded<br />

higher yield than in-situ moisture conservation only during high rainfall years.<br />

All the natural nitrification inhibitors recorded higher maize equivalent yields as compared to<br />

urea and 50% nitrogen through FYM + 50% N through urea. Among the natural nitrification<br />

inhibitors Vitex coated urea recorded higher yields as compared to FYM + 50% N through<br />

urea, Karajin cake, neem cake coated urea, and urea alone respectively.<br />

GHG fluxes were recorded in different treatments. It was observed that CO 2 fluxes were not<br />

influenced by in-situ moisture conservation methods. Karanj cake coated, and neem cake<br />

110 | Page Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

coated urea treatments did not reduce the CO 2 emissions. Higher N 2 O fluxes were observed<br />

immediately after fertilizer application. Among natural nitrification inhibitors, vitex cake<br />

coated urea recorded lower N 2 O fluxes and this was followed by neem cake coated urea.<br />

Conclusion<br />

In- situ moisture conservation practices and Coating <strong>of</strong> urea with natural nitrification<br />

inhibitors were found quite effective for adaptation and mitigation <strong>of</strong> climate change in semiarid<br />

rainfed regions.<br />

3000<br />

Yields, kg/ha<br />

2000<br />

1000<br />

0<br />

2012 2013 2014 2015 2016<br />

Conservation Furrow FYM Conservation Furrow Karanjan cake Conservation Furrow Neem cake<br />

Conservation Furrow Normal Conservation Furrow Vavilia Normal FYM<br />

Normal Karanjan cake Normal Neem cake Normal Normal<br />

Normal Vavilia Tank silt FYM Tank silt Karanjan cake<br />

Tank silt Neem cake Tank silt Normal Tank silt Vavilia<br />

Impact <strong>of</strong> in-situ moisture conservation and natural nitrification inhibitors on crop productivity in<br />

different years<br />

T1-43P-1494<br />

Impact <strong>of</strong> Subsoiling on Soil Moisture Dynamics, soil physical properties<br />

and Yield under Finger Millet + Pigeonpea and Groundnut + Pigeonpea<br />

Cropping Systems<br />

K. Devaraja, Mudalagiriyappa, M. Madan Kumar, B. G. Vasanthi, K. M. Puneetha and<br />

H. S. Latha<br />

All India Coordinated Research Project for Dryland Agriculture, UAS, GKVK, Bangalore<br />

A subsoiler is a tractor-mounted farm implement used for deep tillage, loosening and breaking<br />

up <strong>of</strong> soil at depths twice the depth <strong>of</strong> the normal tillage implement i.e. depth more than 30cm.<br />

As subsoiler loosens the deep compacted soil, it increases the infiltration rate thereby<br />

conserving the soil moisture. Subsoiling will not overturn the top-soil but disturbs and breaks<br />

the plough layer, which result in improving the permeability <strong>of</strong> soil water, creating a "water<br />

reservoir" underneath the soil surface, increasing the efficiency <strong>of</strong> rainwater use, and improving<br />

the ability <strong>of</strong> water conservation in arid areas. Subsequently, it also minimizes the effect <strong>of</strong><br />

Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance<br />

111 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

drought and lead to an increase in crop yield. Keeping these in view, the present investigation<br />

was undertaken to assess the yield advantage and its impact on soil.<br />

Methodology<br />

The field experiment was carried out during Kharif for four years (2018-2021) at AICRP for<br />

Dry land Agriculture, Gandhi Krishi Vignana Kendra, to study the subsoiling effect on<br />

moisture conservation in finger millet + pigeon pea and groundnut + pigeon pea cropping<br />

system. The experiment was conducted in split plot design with two cropping system in main<br />

plot viz., C 1: Finger millet + Pigeon pea and C 2: Groundnut + Pigeon pea and five subsoiling<br />

treatments viz., S1: subsoiling at 2 m interval, S2: subsoiling at 4 m interval, S3: subsoiling at 2<br />

m interval with FYM, S 4: subsoiling at 4 m interval with FYM and S 5: Control in sub plots and<br />

replicated three times.<br />

Results<br />

Soil moisture content, Yield and Economics<br />

The data pertaining to soil moisture at 0-15 cm depth at different crop growing stages is<br />

presented from the year 2018 to 2021. Among the different subsoiling treatments, subsoiling<br />

at 2 m interval along with the addition <strong>of</strong> farm yard manure were found to be superior to rest<br />

<strong>of</strong> the treatments. Better root development in subsoiling treatment might be due to the better<br />

available soil moisture regime. Similar results were reported by Ramana et al. (2015). Among<br />

different sub soiling treatment during 2021 S 3 (finger millet equivalent yield: 2765 kg ha -1 , net<br />

returns: ₹. 53089 ha -1 and B:C ratio: 2.35) and S4 (finger millet equivalent yield: 2682 kg ha -1 ,<br />

net returns: ₹. 51244 ha -1 and B:C ratio: 2.35) were on par and lower yield and net returns were<br />

found in the remaining treatments. There was no significant difference among the interaction<br />

effect on finger millet equivalent yield. In comparison with the pooled data from first three<br />

years (2018-2020), subsoiling at 2 m interval with FYM showed significantly higher finger<br />

millet equivalent yield (3088 kg ha -1 ), net returns (₹. 59273 ha -1 ) and B:C ratio (2.56) and the<br />

increasing trend in the yield were S 3>S 4>S 1>S 2>S 5 during three years data (2018-2020) but the<br />

trend during 2021 was S3=S4>S1=S2=S5 which clearly showed that there was no subsoiling<br />

effect from the fourth year but due to the addition <strong>of</strong> organic manure in subsoiling at 2 m<br />

interval with FYM and subsoiling at 4 m interval with FYM for four consecutive years resulted<br />

in higher yield, net returns and benefit cost ratio. The increase in yield during 2018-2020 was<br />

due to break down <strong>of</strong> hard pan which increased the available soil moisture along with nutrient<br />

availability by the application <strong>of</strong> organic manure (Sun et al., 2017).<br />

112 | Page Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Conclusion<br />

Subsoiling at 2m interval + organic manure (S 3) resulted in higher productivity and pr<strong>of</strong>itability<br />

for three years. From fourth year subsoiling had no effect, therefore subsoiling to be<br />

implemented once in three years and addition <strong>of</strong> organic manure also helps in enhancing the<br />

productivity.<br />

References<br />

Ramana, C., Sudhakar, P., Krishna Reddy, G., Nagamadhuri, K. V., Prasanthi, T., Lavanya<br />

Kumari, P., Gridhara Krishna, T. and Hemasri, A., Economic effect <strong>of</strong> mechanical<br />

intervention through subsoiling on growth and yield <strong>of</strong> rainfed pigeonpea (Cajanus<br />

cajan). Indian J. Agric. Sci., 85 (7): 873-876.<br />

Sun, X., Zaisong Ding., Xinbing Wang., Haipeng Hou., Baoyuan Zhou., Yang Yue., Wei Ma.,<br />

Junzhu Ge., Zhimin Wang and Ming Zhao., 2017, Subsoiling practices change root<br />

distribution and increase post-anthesis dry matter accumulation and yield in summer<br />

maize. Plos One., 12 (4).<br />

Pooled data (2018-2020) and 2021 <strong>of</strong> Finger millet and ground yield and economics as<br />

influenced by subsoiling<br />

Treatment<br />

Finger millet<br />

equivalent<br />

yield<br />

Main Plot: Cropping system<br />

2018-2020 2021<br />

Net<br />

return<br />

(Rs. ha -1 )<br />

B:C<br />

ratio<br />

Finger millet<br />

equivalent<br />

yield<br />

Net<br />

return<br />

(Rs. ha -1 )<br />

B:C<br />

ratio<br />

C 1 2576 46813 2.36 2578 51802 2.50<br />

C 2 2560 43738 2.25 2114 31572 1.93<br />

S.Em± 53.19 - - 49.85 - -<br />

CD at 5 % NS - - 303.33 - -<br />

Sub plot: Subsoiling<br />

S 1 2497 41080 2.21 2110 31836 1.99<br />

S 2 2363 36576 2.04 2097 31202 1.94<br />

S 3 3088 59273 2.56 2765 53089 2.35<br />

S 4 2814 51515 2.41 2682 51244 2.35<br />

S 5 2078 37932 2.33 2078 41063 2.45<br />

S.Em± 58.45 - - 46.77 - -<br />

CD at 5 % 175.23 - - 140.21 - -<br />

Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance<br />

113 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

30<br />

S1 S2 S3 S4 S5<br />

Soil moisture content (%)<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

0<br />

30 DAS 60 DAS 90 DAS 30 DAS 60 DAS 90 DAS 30 DAS 60 DAS 90 DAS 30 DAS 60 DAS 90 DAS<br />

2018 2019 2020 2021<br />

Soil moisture content at 15 cm as influenced by subsoiling during 2018-2021<br />

T1-44 P-1517<br />

Checkdams - A way for Rainwater Harvesting, Climate Resilience and<br />

Sustainability <strong>of</strong> Rainfed Farmers in Ananthapuramu, Andhra Pradesh<br />

B. Chandana, Malleswari Sadhineni, V. Sivajyothi, M. Ravi Kishore, K. Naveen Kumar,<br />

J.V. Prasad and J.V.N.S. Prasad<br />

ANGRAU- Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Reddipalli, Andhra Pradesh – 515 701<br />

ICAR-ATARI, CRIDA campus, Hyderabad – 500 059<br />

TDC-NICRA, ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad – 500 059<br />

Ananthapuramu is one <strong>of</strong> the rain shadow regions <strong>of</strong> Rayalaseema in Andhra Pradesh with<br />

normal annual rainfall <strong>of</strong> 552 mm. The climate is characterized with low/ intermittent/uneven<br />

rainfall, which leads to decline in productivity <strong>of</strong> rainfed crops. Climate resilient technologies<br />

viz., checkdams will store the harvested rain water, increase groundwater availability and also<br />

prevent soil erosion (Bhargav and Tank, 2011). Checkdams control rain water run<strong>of</strong>f, rain<br />

water percolates down to the underground aquifers. Recharged aquifers will ensure ground<br />

water recharge in open wells and bore wells and create considerable opportunities to bring<br />

additional area under cultivation, increase the productivity and pr<strong>of</strong>itability <strong>of</strong> small and<br />

marginal farm holdings.<br />

114 | Page Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Methodology<br />

Construction/renovation <strong>of</strong> checkdams was taken up as a natural resource management<br />

technology during 2011 to 2021 at Chamalur, Chakrayapeta and Peravali for improving the<br />

crop productivity and socio-economic conditions <strong>of</strong> farmers under National Innovations in<br />

Climate Resilient Agriculture (NICRA) project operating at KVK, Reddipalli, Ananthapuramu<br />

district. A total <strong>of</strong> 21 checkdam were constructed/renovated in these villages. For the present<br />

study, data was collected on size <strong>of</strong> checkdam, volume <strong>of</strong> water harvested, rainfall(mm)<br />

received, no <strong>of</strong> borewells, openwells recharged and economics <strong>of</strong> crops cultivated utilizing the<br />

water stored in checkdam during 2019-2021 in the adopted villages.<br />

Results<br />

With the NRM interventions <strong>of</strong> KVK-Reddipalli under NICRA project, 21 check dams were<br />

constructed/renovated in Chamalur, Chakraypeta and Peravali villages. Farmers used to<br />

cultivate groundnut and redgram majorly depending on rainfall. During the years 2019 to 2021,<br />

nearly 35967 m 3 , 101005 m 3 , 101914 m 3 <strong>of</strong> water was harvested and stored in check dams as<br />

shown in the table. During the years 2019 to 2021, 53 open wells and 166 bore wells were<br />

recharged in these three villages. Similar findings were reported by Venkateswarlu, 2019. In<br />

addition to the groundnut crop grown earlier, farmers started cultivating castor, greengram,<br />

redgram, paddy, yellow jowar, curry leaf, tomato, bhendi, pumpkin, lily, jasmine, sweet<br />

orange, banana, custard apple, guava, acid lime, pomegranate and fodders with the harvested<br />

rain water.<br />

The net income <strong>of</strong> the farmers increased from Rs.9171/ha with cultivation <strong>of</strong> rainfed groundnut<br />

before construction <strong>of</strong> checkdams to average net returns <strong>of</strong> Rs.64650/ha with cultivation <strong>of</strong><br />

various agricultural and horticultural crops in NICRA adopted villages (Table 2). Net returns<br />

from rainfed groundnut cultivation increased from Rs.9171/ha to Rs.43163/ha due to<br />

availability <strong>of</strong> water for supplemental irrigation from checkdams or recharged<br />

borewells/openwells in vicinity <strong>of</strong> checkdams. Among the various crops grown curry leaf has<br />

recorded highest net returns (Rs.230000/ha) with a B:C ratio <strong>of</strong> 8.67 followed by jasmine<br />

(Rs.162500/ha, 3.60) and castor (Rs.94323/ha, 1.92).<br />

Conclusion<br />

Construction/renovation <strong>of</strong> check dams resulted in harvesting, storage <strong>of</strong> rain water, recharge<br />

<strong>of</strong> nearby open/bore wells. Timely availability <strong>of</strong> water for supplemental irrigation from these<br />

sources increased the cultivated area and income <strong>of</strong> rainfed farmers.<br />

References<br />

Bhargav, K. S. and Tank, U. N. 2011. Development <strong>of</strong> water resources at micro level through<br />

rain water harvesting. Agricultural Engineering Today 35(1): 16-19.<br />

Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance<br />

115 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Venkateswarlu, B. 2019. Water harvesting: A key strategy for climate change adaptation in<br />

rainfed agriculture. In proceedings <strong>of</strong> 13th International Conference on Development<br />

<strong>of</strong> Dryland Areas, February11-14, 2019, ICAR-CAZRI, Jodhpur. Pp.218-227.<br />

Improved Jhum in southern part <strong>of</strong> Mizoram<br />

H. Vanlalhmuliana, S. Sisi and Lalrinengi<br />

Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Siaha district, Mizoram -796901<br />

kvksaiha@gmail.com<br />

T1-45 P-1532<br />

In India, Jhumming is practiced mainly in the northeastern hilly region. Although it is both a<br />

labour intensive and land-extensive method <strong>of</strong> cultivation, it occupies a distinct place in the<br />

tribal economy and constitutes a vital part <strong>of</strong> the lifestyle and socio-economic set-up <strong>of</strong> hills.<br />

Traditional shifting cultivation also known as Jhum, has always been a major source <strong>of</strong><br />

livelihood for the farming community <strong>of</strong> Mizoram which consists <strong>of</strong> clearing <strong>of</strong> jungle by<br />

burning the vegetation and cultivating the plot <strong>of</strong> land for one or two years. These lands usually<br />

lie on the slopes <strong>of</strong> hills in thickly forested landscapes. A thick smog and haze eclipse the sun<br />

all through the day when jhum areas are burnt. Burning the felled trees helps release nutrients<br />

for farming. After this, the cultivated land is left fallow to regain the vegetation cover once the<br />

land loses fertility. Then, the jhum farmer shifts to another forest patch and returns to the same<br />

site for another cropping phase only after a few years. They also have a practice <strong>of</strong> bunding the<br />

fields using logs. The entire jhum system in Mizoram depends on the natural indicators and<br />

seasons that governs their stages <strong>of</strong> activities like selection <strong>of</strong> land, clearance <strong>of</strong> jungle,<br />

burning, sowing, harvesting etc. This method <strong>of</strong> cultivation is viewed as the first step in<br />

transition from food gathering and hunting to food production. It encompasses mixed cropping,<br />

viz., horticulture and annual cropping, perennial tree crops, animal husbandry and management<br />

<strong>of</strong> forest and fallows in sequential or rotational cycles.<br />

Methodology<br />

The On-farm trials was conducted during March 2022 - October 2022 at Tisopi village, Siaha<br />

district, Mizoram under NICRA project. The agroclimatic zone was humid subtropical hill zone<br />

and major soil type was red laterite and is slightly acidic in nature. The major climatic<br />

constrains <strong>of</strong> Tisopi was high drought prone area and high erodibility <strong>of</strong> soils and the average<br />

rainfall was 2030mm. The study comprised <strong>of</strong> three varieties <strong>of</strong> local rice viz., Saphuapa, Sasu<br />

kylyno and Idaw kylyno in traditional jhum field without maintaining spacing. In one jhum<br />

field, all the three varieties were grown side by side with and without logwood bunding. The<br />

size <strong>of</strong> the field for each variety is 1 acre and half <strong>of</strong> the field is under traditional jhum without<br />

logwood and another half was under logwood bunding. The data was recorded from such three<br />

jhum fields grown by three (3) different farmers in the same cluster. The data was carefully<br />

116 | Page Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

recorded from randomly selected plants from with and without logwood bunding for taking<br />

biometrical observations and yield calculation. In one hill 2-3 seeds was sown without seed<br />

treatment, nor the application <strong>of</strong> fertilizer or plant protection chemicals. Log wood bunding<br />

techniques involved keeping different sizes <strong>of</strong> log across the slope at a distance <strong>of</strong> 3-5 meters<br />

for soil and water conservation and those logs mainly comes from clearing the jungle for jhum<br />

field itself. The plant parameters like, plant height, number <strong>of</strong> tillers per hill, number <strong>of</strong><br />

effective tillers per square meter, panicle length, number <strong>of</strong> grains per panicle, test weight and<br />

grain yield.<br />

Results<br />

The growth and development parameters <strong>of</strong> rice viz., plant height, number <strong>of</strong> leaves per plant,<br />

flag leaf length, and number <strong>of</strong> tillers per hill under the logwood bunding method showed<br />

significant differences as compared to jhum field without logwood bunding as shown in the<br />

tables. These may be due to the fact that logwood bunding check the erosion <strong>of</strong> the topsoil and<br />

the decomposing weeds provided rich nutrients to the soil to enhance fertility for better growth<br />

and yield. The beneficial effect <strong>of</strong> logwood bunding method in enhancing the growth and yield<br />

over the traditional jhum method through increased height, leaves, number <strong>of</strong> tillers, leaf area<br />

ultimately reflected in higher yield attributing characters viz., number <strong>of</strong> panicles per hill,<br />

length <strong>of</strong> panicle, number <strong>of</strong> panicles, primary and secondary branch per panicles, number <strong>of</strong><br />

filled grains per panicle, weight <strong>of</strong> filled grains per panicle, test weight and ultimately the grain<br />

yield obtained from the plant as represented in the tables.<br />

Parameters <strong>of</strong> Rice crops variety Saphuapa, Sasu kylyno and Idaw kylyno under Normal<br />

Sl. No.<br />

Parameters <strong>of</strong> crop<br />

jhum without log-wood bunding<br />

Local rice variety<br />

Saphuapa Sasu kylyno Idaw<br />

kylyno<br />

1. Average plant height (cm) 138.00 158.00 134.00<br />

2. Average number <strong>of</strong> leaves per plant 5.00 4.00 4.00<br />

3. Average flag Leaf length (cm) 47.00 84.00 62.00<br />

4. Average number <strong>of</strong> panicles per plant 18.00 12.00 19.00<br />

5. Average number <strong>of</strong> grains per panicle 186.00 264.00 361.00<br />

6. Average panicle length (cm) 22.25 20.50 21.00<br />

7. Average primary branch per panicle 12.00 16.00 15.00<br />

8. Average secondary branch per panicle 38.00 41.00 45.00<br />

9. Average number <strong>of</strong> tillers per hill 21.00 27.00 24.00<br />

10. Average effective tiller per square meter 218.00 278.00 257.00<br />

11. Average filled grain per panicle 135.00 169.00 148.00<br />

12. Average grain yield (t/ha) 1.15 1.45 1.20<br />

Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance<br />

117 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

13. Average test weight 10.25 11.50 10.75<br />

14. Average length <strong>of</strong> the main root (cm) 8.50 7.00 11.00<br />

Parameters <strong>of</strong> the Rice crop variety Saphuapa, Sasu kylyno and Idaw kylyno under<br />

Sl. No.<br />

Parameters <strong>of</strong> crop<br />

improved jhum with log-wood bunding<br />

Local rice variety<br />

Saphuapa Sasu kylyno Idaw<br />

kylyno<br />

1. Average plant height (cm) 145.00 162.00 147.00<br />

2. Average number <strong>of</strong> leaves per plant 6.00 4.00 4.00<br />

3. Average flag Leaf length (cm) 59.00 87.00 69.00<br />

4. Average number <strong>of</strong> panicles per plant 21.00 15.00 20.00<br />

5. Average number <strong>of</strong> grains per panicle 215.00 298.00 369.00<br />

6. Average panicle length (cm) 23.00 22.50 23.00<br />

7. Average primary branch per panicle 13.00 18.00 16.00<br />

8. Average secondary branch per panicle 39.00 43.00 46.00<br />

9. Average number <strong>of</strong> tillers per hill 24.00 31.00 26.00<br />

10. Average effective tiller per square meter 229.00 285.00 262.00<br />

11. Average filled grain per panicle 139.00 177.00 152.00<br />

12. Average grain yield (t/ha) 1.45 1.95 1.60<br />

13. Average test weight 10.50 12.15 10.75<br />

14. Average length <strong>of</strong> the main root (cm) 10.50 8.25 11.00<br />

Conclusion<br />

As a result <strong>of</strong> implementation <strong>of</strong> improved jhum technique i.e logwood bunding method in<br />

cluster area <strong>of</strong> Tisopi village under NICRA project, local paddy production increased from 1.15<br />

-1.45t to 1.45 -1.95t per hectare. Owing to above result, it creates a good rapport between Krishi<br />

Vigyan Kendra (KVK) and Tisopi farmers. In addition. those farmers involved in the on-farm<br />

testing <strong>of</strong> logwood bunding method became a source <strong>of</strong> inspiration for fellow farmers <strong>of</strong> the<br />

area. The above data were from only one cropping season and need to repeat the trials to<br />

justified the findings in the future. Nonetheless, the farmers <strong>of</strong> Tisopi village were clearly<br />

motivated to take up logwood bunding measures in the sloppy land not only in paddy<br />

cultivation but for vegetables as well. They became aware on the importance <strong>of</strong> soil and water<br />

conservation in crop production and are ready to adopt Improved Jhum Technique in the<br />

coming season.<br />

118 | Page Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance<br />

T1-46 P-1533<br />

Development <strong>of</strong> Digital Weighing Type Lysimeter to Monitor Soil Water<br />

Balance Parameters<br />

Ajita Gupta * , R.K. Singh, and Mukesh Kumar<br />

ICAR-CIAE, Bhopal (M.P.)-462038<br />

*<br />

ajitagupta2012@gmail.com<br />

Enhancing water productivity (WP) <strong>of</strong> different crops by judicious irrigation scheduling is one<br />

<strong>of</strong> the major activities to ensure water saving in the agriculture sector. Scheduling the time and<br />

quantity <strong>of</strong> irrigation water application is primarily governed by crop evapotranspiration.<br />

Among various technologies, a lysimeter is generally used for direct measurement <strong>of</strong> crop<br />

evapotranspiration and water balance components. Various lysimeters have been installed by<br />

IMD in the agriculture stations <strong>of</strong> different climatic zones <strong>of</strong> India for the measurement <strong>of</strong> crop<br />

evapotranspiration. However, these lysimeters are bulky, manual, and need proper<br />

maintenance. Also available digital lysimeters are very complex and costly. Only very few<br />

studies have been executed in India for the development <strong>of</strong> weighing lysimeters with a digital<br />

measurement system, which is highly precise and accurate at a lower cost.<br />

Knowledge <strong>of</strong> crop evapotranspiration (ET) is important in modeling ET, crop growth<br />

simulation, scheduling irrigations, optimizing crop production, and irrigation project planning.<br />

The most accurate way to estimate crop water use and develop crop coefficients is with<br />

precision weighing lysimeters, which have generally been regarded as the standard against<br />

which other measures <strong>of</strong> ET are compared. A weighing-type lysimeter can measure the amount<br />

<strong>of</strong> water used in evaporation, transpiration, drainage, leaching, and other water-balancing<br />

parameters. However, high-precision lysimeters are very expensive and sophisticated. An<br />

inexpensive portable weighing lysimeter, which is very sensitive and precise, needs to be<br />

fabricated and put into the operations. This project is aimed at developing a weighing-type field<br />

lysimeter with digital output for developing judicious irrigation scheduling <strong>of</strong> different crops.<br />

Methodology<br />

An IoT-enabled digital weighing type field lysimeter was developed and tested at ICAR- CIAE,<br />

Bhopal. The lysimeter was designed as having an area <strong>of</strong> 1.38 m 2 , it was supported by a 1.5-<br />

ton single-point platform load cell. It was powered by two 5-watt solar panels and a 7 Ah<br />

battery for continuous power supply. The inner tank <strong>of</strong> the lysimeter was made in a cylindrical<br />

format with dimensions <strong>of</strong> 750 mm in height, and 450 mm in diameter using a 10-15 mm thick<br />

HDPE drum. To facilitate drainage, a 15 cm filter layer was added to the bottom <strong>of</strong> the lysimeter<br />

tank. The top <strong>of</strong> the tank was then filled with a 60 cm depth <strong>of</strong> soil. The drainage water was<br />

collected at the collector tank available at the bottom <strong>of</strong> the lysimeter. The collector tank was<br />

made using PVC pipe 110 mm in diameter and 45 cm in height. The depth <strong>of</strong> the water drained<br />

119 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

through the lysimeter was measured using a waterpro<strong>of</strong> ultrasonic sensor installed at the top <strong>of</strong><br />

the collector tank. The float switches and a 12-volt mini water pump have been used to empty<br />

the collector tank when water reaches a certain limit. Soil moisture sensors and soil temperature<br />

sensors (three each) were installed at 20 cm intervals from the top <strong>of</strong> the lysimeter. The<br />

developed lysimeter measures all the soil water balance components at an interval <strong>of</strong> 6 minutes.<br />

ESP8266 microcontroller board has been used to program the logic and also to establish WiFi<br />

connectivity. The controller has an LCD display (16×2) to check and examine the working <strong>of</strong><br />

the lysimeter onsite. The sensor data are stored both in the SD card onsite and on the cloud<br />

server using the IoT platform (ThingSpeak). For real-time data monitoring remotely, it<br />

incorporates a WiFi-connected digital display unit operated by a Raspberry Pi microcontroller<br />

board. Therefore, the developed lysimeter was found to be precise, and its measurements were<br />

satisfactory for the study <strong>of</strong> water balance parameters for irrigation scheduling.<br />

Results<br />

Developed lysimeter with sensors and power sources<br />

The developed lysimeter was calibrated to measure the accuracy <strong>of</strong> soil moisture sensors, soil<br />

temperature sensors, water depth sensors, and load cells. During the testing <strong>of</strong> the developed<br />

lysimeter, the data were recorded in the Thingspeak IoT platform. These sensors were<br />

calibrated using standard procedures. During testing, the lysimeter showed high linearity and<br />

no hysteresis. The least count/resolution <strong>of</strong> the developed lysimeter measurement was in the<br />

range <strong>of</strong> 0.1 and 0.25 mm <strong>of</strong> the depth <strong>of</strong> water. A total <strong>of</strong> 20 soil moisture samples <strong>of</strong> different<br />

soil moistures (completely dry to completely saturated) were prepared and the moisture content<br />

<strong>of</strong> these samples was calculated using the gravimetric method as well as using soil moisture<br />

sensors. The moisture sensors show high accuracy with an R 2 value <strong>of</strong> 0.98. A single-point<br />

platform load cell was used to measure the change in the weight <strong>of</strong> the lysimeter tank. The load<br />

120 | Page Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

cell was pre-calibrated. However, the accuracy <strong>of</strong> load cell measurement was measured using<br />

the known standard weight. A pre-calibrated ultrasonic sensor was placed at the top <strong>of</strong> the<br />

drainage tank. The sensor reads the depth <strong>of</strong> water drained through the lysimeter tank.<br />

Corresponding to each reading <strong>of</strong> the sensor, a scale reading was recorded. A calibration graph<br />

was drawn between the sensor reading and scale value, which shows a high R 2 value <strong>of</strong> 0.99.<br />

Conclusion<br />

Data <strong>of</strong> different sensors <strong>of</strong> lysimeter received on Thingspeak IoT platform<br />

Lysimeter studies will be a crucial tool for translating the outcomes <strong>of</strong> small-scale research into<br />

results applicable to a wider geographic area. Combining lysimeter research with direct<br />

measurements in the field or catchment, as well as modeling methodologies, allows for scenario<br />

Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance<br />

121 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

simulation <strong>of</strong> current climatic and hydrologic concerns (e.g. climate change, land management,<br />

groundwater recharge, etc.).<br />

T1-47 P-1574<br />

Popularization <strong>of</strong> Climate Smart Technology – Jalkund/Farm Pond for<br />

Crop Cultivation Post Monsoon Period<br />

Amrutha T., Azriel Mervin Tariang*, Arun K. Singha, and Rajumoni Bordoloi<br />

ICAR-ATARI, Zone-VII, Umiam<br />

Umroi Road, Umiam-793103, Meghalaya, INDIA<br />

* azrieltariang@gmail.com<br />

The preservation <strong>of</strong> moisture through water conservation structures like farm ponds and<br />

"Jalkunds" is one <strong>of</strong> the solutions that area farmers most frequently request. During monsoon,<br />

when rain is abundant, moisture or water is stored in these constructions to be used throughout<br />

the lean season, which is typically during the winter. Farmers used to be unable to cultivate<br />

crops during the winter months after harvesting paddy due to a lack <strong>of</strong> water. In addition, with<br />

the ongoing changes in rainfall patterns brought about by climate change the fields were<br />

typically left fallow. Some farmers find it burdensome because they are unable to cultivate the<br />

crop and earn more income throughout the season. For this reason, the majority <strong>of</strong> the farmers<br />

have sought assistance on this particular problem from various agricultural authorities. Since<br />

the project's inception, this specific intervention has benefited a number <strong>of</strong> farmers. According<br />

to the annual reports between 2015 and 2022, 211 farmers from the five states <strong>of</strong> Manipur,<br />

Meghalaya, Mizoram, Nagaland, and Tripura that are part <strong>of</strong> ICAR-ATARI, Zone-VII, have<br />

benefited from the ex-situ moisture conservation intervention. The total cropping area under<br />

Jalkund was 119.83 ha, compared to the area without Jalkund which 23.02 ha was only, which<br />

represents a 420.54% increase in cropping pattern over the period. Naturally, crops grown in<br />

places with irrigation from water storage systems resulted in higher yields than those grown<br />

without irrigation from such systems. To site an example, the average yield from the cultivation<br />

cabbage varieties viz., Green Magic, Wonder Ball, Green Hero, Rare Ball, and Blue Jays which<br />

were cultivated under the intervention to crops under farmer's practice was reported to be<br />

243.47 q/ha and 187.28 q/ha, respectively. This represents a yield increase <strong>of</strong> 30% over the<br />

farmer's practice. The average net return and the BC ratio from the intervention to the farmer's<br />

practice was reported to be Rs. 133878.75 and Rs. 60222.00 and 2.86 and 1.75 per hectare<br />

respectively. All Rabi crops grown with irrigation from farm ponds and jalkunds are following<br />

the same pattern. This establishes the significance <strong>of</strong> the moisture conservation initiative in the<br />

region. Moreover, it was reported that a number <strong>of</strong> capable farmers have chosen to construct<br />

their own water storage structures for agricultural and allied purposes. It will gain popularity<br />

over time and the KVKs spearheading the technology are urged to collaborate with other<br />

departments to reach more farmers throughout the many districts.<br />

122 | Page Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

T1-48 P-1582<br />

Land Configuration Management for Enhancing the Crop Productivity<br />

Sreedhar Chauhan and D . Mohan Das<br />

Agricultural Research Station, Adilabad, PJTSAU, Telangana<br />

There is a need for in-situ soil and water conservation and proper drainage technology in deep<br />

black soils <strong>of</strong> the Northern Telangana Zone <strong>of</strong> Telangana, as the receipt <strong>of</strong> annual rainfall is<br />

1050 mm leads to crop damage regularly during the grand crop growth period either due to<br />

excess or deficit rains. Land configuration techniques such as ridges and furrows and broad<br />

bed and furrow (BBF) can play a vital role to overcome soil-related problems by providing<br />

easy and uniform germination as well as good growth and development <strong>of</strong> plants (Ramesh et<br />

al., 2020). To tackle the abiotic problems, a field experiment is carried out at Agricultural<br />

Research Station, Adilabad (PJTSAU) during Kharif, 2018-19 to 2020-21 to study the<br />

performance <strong>of</strong> various land configurations concerning moisture conservation, the effect <strong>of</strong><br />

various land configurations on the growth and yield <strong>of</strong> various crops and cropping systems and<br />

the economics <strong>of</strong> various treatment combinations.<br />

Methodology<br />

Season: Kharif, 2018-19 to 2020-21; Soil type: BC soil; Design: Strip-plot, No. <strong>of</strong> treatments:<br />

15; No. <strong>of</strong> replication: 03; Varieties: Soybean - Basara; Redgram-PRG 176 (Ujwala) & Cotton-<br />

RCH-659 (BG-II hybrid); Spacings: Soybean-45 x 10 cm; Redgram-3.15/3.6 m x 0.20 m &<br />

Cotton-90 x 60 cm; Method <strong>of</strong> sowing: Dibbling <strong>of</strong> single seed per spot at a uniform depth <strong>of</strong><br />

3-5 cm; RDF: PJTSAU recommendations. The treatments consisted <strong>of</strong> 3 main plots (Land<br />

configuration practices; L 1 - Flatbed system; L 2 - BBF system & L 3 - Ridges & furrow system)<br />

and 5 Subplots (Cropping sequences; C1 – Soybean – Chickpea; C 2 – Soybean – Rabi sorghum;<br />

C 3 – Soybean – Safflower; C 4 – Soybean + Pigeonpea (7:1) & C 5 – Cotton + Pigeonpea (4:1).<br />

Results<br />

Among the three land configuration practices (BBF, ridge & furrow, and traditional method <strong>of</strong><br />

cultivation), crops sown on the BBF method recorded higher soybean seed equivalent yield<br />

(4786 kg ha -1 ) followed by ridge & furrow method <strong>of</strong> sowing (4121 kg ha -1 ) and flatbed<br />

methods (3670 kg ha -1 ). BBF method facilitated proper drainage in heavy rainfall periods as<br />

well as moisture conservation during drought situations and recorded 5.5 kg/ha-mm RUE.<br />

Similarly, among the different cropping sequences tested (soybean-chickpea, soybean-rabi<br />

jowar, soybean–safflower, soybean + pigeonpea, cotton + pigeonpea), the traditional<br />

intercropping system, cotton + pigeonpea (4:1) was found to be superior (4427 kg ha -1 <strong>of</strong><br />

soybean SEY) and found at par with soybean-chickpea sequence crop (4307 kg ha -1 SEY).<br />

However, Soybean-rabi jowar/safflower (or) soybean + pigeonpea (7:1) recorded lower values<br />

Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance<br />

123 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

viz., 3757, 3792, and 3716 kg ha -1 soybean SEY, respectively. Interaction effect between the<br />

land configuration practices and cropping sequences, no significant effect was observed on<br />

yield attributes, yield, and economics <strong>of</strong> either cotton or soybean intercropped with pigeonpea<br />

or soybean-based various crop sequences.<br />

Conclusion<br />

BBF method <strong>of</strong> cultivation is found to be superior to ridge and furrow method or traditional<br />

flatbed method <strong>of</strong> soybean cultivation. In Dryland agriculture or rainfed situations, based on<br />

soil moisture regimes, cultivation <strong>of</strong> intercrops or sequence crops are always better than sole<br />

crops by making use <strong>of</strong> proper land configuration practices like BBF or ridge & furrow<br />

methods.<br />

References<br />

Ramesh T, Rathika S, Nagarajan G and Shanmugapriya P, 2020. Land configuration and<br />

nitrogen management for enhancing the crop productivity: A review. The Pharma<br />

Innovation Journal 9(7): 222-230.<br />

Response <strong>of</strong> land configurations under various cropping sequences under rainfed conditions<br />

(Kharif, rabi/summer, 2018-19 to 2020-21)<br />

Treatments<br />

Main plots: 03 (Land configuration methods)<br />

Main (+)<br />

Inter crops<br />

MCEY (kg/ha) (Soybean)<br />

Sequence<br />

crops<br />

Total<br />

L 1 : BBF System 3520 1266 4786<br />

L 2: Ridges & Furrow System 2985 1136 4121<br />

L 3: Flat bed System 2652 1018 3670<br />

Sub plots: 05 (Cropping sequences)<br />

S. em+ 121.3 121.3 119.6<br />

CD (at 5%) 320.2 320.2 297.8<br />

C 1: Soybean – Chickpea 2477 1830 4307<br />

C 2: Soybean – Rabi Jowar 2264 1492 3757<br />

C 3: Soybean – Safflower 2262 1530 3792<br />

C 4: Soybean + Redgram (7:1) 3716 0.0 3716<br />

C 5: Cotton + Redgram (4:1) 4427 0.0 4427<br />

S. em+ 129.3 96.3 112.6<br />

CD (at 5%) 389.3 208.6 304.2<br />

Interaction<br />

S. em+ 230.8 230.8 177.6<br />

CD (at 5%) NS NS NS<br />

124 | Page Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

T1-49 P-1281<br />

Impact and Effectiveness <strong>of</strong> Rainwater Management Activities and Water<br />

Utilization for Rainfed Crops in the Semi-arid Region -A Case Study<br />

S. Vijayakumar, K.V. Rao, Manoranjan Kumar, R. Rejani, A.S. Dhimate, D.B.V.<br />

Ramana and V.K. Singh<br />

ICAR-Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture (CRIDA), Hyderabad -500 059, Telangana<br />

Soil and water are the two important critical inputs in dryland agriculture. The land is fixed in<br />

supply, which cannot multiply but can be managed properly for optimum utilization. Water is<br />

another scarce input owing to erratic and poor distribution <strong>of</strong> rainfall, which limits the<br />

production <strong>of</strong> crops. In this direction, there is a need to emphasize the conservation <strong>of</strong> these<br />

limited resources with appropriate practices. Harvesting and recycling rainwater in dry lands<br />

is important to improve water use efficiency (Shankar and Shivakumar, 2005). Rainwater<br />

harvesting structures are used for collecting and storing run<strong>of</strong>f water. The construction <strong>of</strong><br />

percolation tanks allows infiltration <strong>of</strong> the storage water through the topsoil to percolate deep<br />

to join the groundwater storage.<br />

Methodology<br />

To review the interest <strong>of</strong> farmers in the community approach to manage water resources, PRA<br />

was conducted in the village. Water scarcity and uneven and insufficient rainfall distribution<br />

are the major problems prioritized by the farmers in the watershed. Transact walk was<br />

conducted to identify the points for the construction <strong>of</strong> different rainwater harvesting structures<br />

displayed as physiographic <strong>of</strong> the Cluster villages in Rangareddy district Telangana State.<br />

Among the existing open wells (average depth 15-20 m) some <strong>of</strong> the wells shave dried up since<br />

2008 due to the indiscriminate drilling <strong>of</strong> bore wells. Further, the failure rate <strong>of</strong> the bore wells<br />

commissioned since 2014 was three for every successful bore well and resulting in increasing<br />

the financial liability <strong>of</strong> the farmer. The key activities taken up in the watershed area are given<br />

below:<br />

Renovation <strong>of</strong> traditional water bodies: Desilting activity involves the removal <strong>of</strong> silt from<br />

the water body using human labor. Farmers are encouraged to collect the silt and apply it to<br />

crop fields to improve soil fertility.<br />

Land development: The activities involve land leveling, bunding and terracing, which have<br />

been implemented on fallow or marginal croplands <strong>of</strong> scheduled caste and scheduled tribe<br />

farmers. Those lands, which were not cropped earlier, due to the slope and degraded nature <strong>of</strong><br />

the land, are being brought under cultivation after the implementation <strong>of</strong> land development<br />

activities. Individual farmers levelled the fallow lands or wastelands, which were earlier not<br />

suitable for pr<strong>of</strong>itable crop cultivation.<br />

Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance<br />

125 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Artificial Recharge Intervention modules at adopted villages: The artificial recharge to<br />

groundwater aims at augmentation <strong>of</strong> groundwater reservoir by modifying the natural<br />

movement <strong>of</strong> surface water.<br />

Renovated rainwater harvesting structure<br />

Rainwater filled in the percolation tank<br />

A view <strong>of</strong> the rainwater harvesting structure in the watershed village<br />

Rainwater harvesting and its recycling /recharging <strong>of</strong> groundwater: Rainwater harvesting<br />

and recycling through farm ponds and restoration <strong>of</strong> old water harvesting structures in the<br />

village may be useful in rainfed areas. Percolation tanks and ponds may be tried for recharging<br />

<strong>of</strong> wells.<br />

Recharge <strong>of</strong> wells with rainwater: The groundwater is depleted year by year because <strong>of</strong> dense<br />

bore wells. These open wells may not be yielding enough water to meet the requirements <strong>of</strong><br />

farm operation during early monsoon. The percolated water from rainfall requires a few weeks<br />

time to bring the water level up or recharge the wells. Farmers cannot store run<strong>of</strong>f water<br />

separately in the field itself.<br />

Impacts measurability: The activities implemented in villages include those that provide<br />

benefits in the short as well as long term. Further, some <strong>of</strong> the impacts will be visible only in<br />

the long term.<br />

Results<br />

Ex-situ rainwater harvesting and efficient utilization: The importance <strong>of</strong> rainwater<br />

harvesting has increased in recent years due to the increased rainfall variability, heavy rains<br />

and depletion <strong>of</strong> groundwater levels. Surface-water storage structures can play a vital role in<br />

augmenting groundwater recharge, especially in semiarid and arid regions. Rainwater<br />

harvesting for recharge <strong>of</strong> wells and recycling through farm ponds, restoration <strong>of</strong> old rainwater<br />

harvesting structures in rainfed areas, and open/bore wells for recharging groundwater are<br />

taken up for enhancing farm-level water storage in drylands.<br />

Increased well Yield: Water yield/recuperation rate before and after interventions for different<br />

wells indicates that the recharge rate increased by around 22% before interventions, the wells<br />

126 | Page Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

went dry after 1 to 1.5 hrs pumping and got recuperation in 24-36 hrs. After implementation <strong>of</strong><br />

interventions, pumping could be done for 1-2 hrs before the well went dry and it took 18 to 24<br />

hrs to recuperate.<br />

On the basis <strong>of</strong> the data collected from the observation wells and the perception <strong>of</strong> farmers, it<br />

was found that the water levels rose to the tune <strong>of</strong> 2 to 6 meters in the surrounding area <strong>of</strong><br />

unlined farm ponds and 2 to 8 meters in the surrounding area <strong>of</strong> percolation tanks. A total <strong>of</strong><br />

30 wells (50%) were found to be partly <strong>of</strong> fully influenced by the water conservation measures<br />

in the watershed area. The data presented data clearly indicated that response was quick in<br />

showing its effect on recharge within 10 to 15 days <strong>of</strong> rainfall. Evaluation studies carried out<br />

on the functioning <strong>of</strong> the structures in the village have indicated that properly located, designed<br />

and constructed different structures can have estimated approximately an efficiency ranging<br />

from 78 to 91% with respect to recharge <strong>of</strong> groundwater, leaving the balance for seepage losses<br />

(from nil to 8%) and evaporation losses (up to 8%). It has increased irrigation area by 15% in<br />

watershed villages and farmers who have got farm pond or well are taking at least two assured<br />

crops in a year. Farmers risk bearing ability increased. The shift in vegetable cultivation is one<br />

strong indicator and it helps in the introduction <strong>of</strong> new crops i.e., fodder-based varieties,<br />

vegetable farming, etc.<br />

Conclusion<br />

The efforts <strong>of</strong> the structures were seen during the project as farmers reported satisfactory water<br />

levels in the wells. The area in rabi also indicates the effect <strong>of</strong> these structures despite a drought<br />

year (2011) (45% normal rainfall). Interventions have a very significant role in the areas <strong>of</strong><br />

resource conservation on the local needs and cropping pattern. Engineering interventions have<br />

a remarkable impact on improving the livelihoods <strong>of</strong> the villages, as they are shown to improve<br />

yield levels by 15% and reduced costs by 30% besides improving the timeliness <strong>of</strong> operations.<br />

Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance<br />

127 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

T1-50 P-1617<br />

Effect <strong>of</strong> In-Situ Moisture Conservation Practices on Productivity and Economics <strong>of</strong><br />

Maize Based Cropping System Under Rainfed Ecosystem <strong>of</strong> South Bihar<br />

M. K. Singh*, Vinod Kumar and Sunil Kumar<br />

1 BAC, Bihar Agricultural University, Sabour, Bhagalpur, 813210,<br />

2 KVK, Munger, Bihar Agricultural University, Sabour.<br />

* mahesh.agro@gmail.com<br />

Water is a critical natural resource and managing rainwater in situ is the key to sustaining<br />

rainfed farming. Moisture conservation holds the key for enhancing productivity and bridging<br />

the yield gaps. To meet the growing demands for food, the scope for further addition to area<br />

under agriculture is possible only through the proper utilization <strong>of</strong> agricultural land. Rainfed<br />

agriculture is mainly dependent on rainfall, especially in India, where the quantity and<br />

distribution <strong>of</strong> monsoon rain determine crop production. Soil water is the main limiting factor<br />

in the production <strong>of</strong> crops since food production in India largely depends on the action <strong>of</strong> the<br />

monsoon under dryland conditions (Choudhary et al. 2021). Different tillage practices are<br />

suitable for in-situ moisture conservation such viz, ridge and furrow system, <strong>of</strong>f-season tillage,<br />

zero tillage, raised bed, broad beds and furrows are pr<strong>of</strong>itable (Rejani et al., 2017 and Hariom<br />

et al., 2013). Conservation tillage techniques, which involve soil-surface crop residue<br />

management systems with minimum or no tillage (Kar et al. 2021) are widely accepted as<br />

sustainable crop management that reduces soil and water losses, restores organic matter,<br />

increases biodiversity and fertility in degraded agriculture soils (Novara et al. 2021). Rabi<br />

oilseed and pulses required less water and ensure better monetary returns.<br />

Methodology<br />

The field experiments were carried out at Dryland research station, Munger during the year<br />

2016-17 to 2019-20 to evaluate the different in-situ moisture conservation practices on<br />

productivity and economics <strong>of</strong> maize-based cropping system under rainfed ecosystem <strong>of</strong> South<br />

Bihar: The sandy-loam soil <strong>of</strong> the experimental field was low in organic carbon (0.26%),<br />

available N (182.5 kg/ha), and available P 2O 5 (19.5 kg/ha) and medium in K 2O (168.6 kg/ha)<br />

with pH value 6.8. The experiment was laid out in Split Plot Design and replicated thrice with<br />

three levels <strong>of</strong> moisture conservation viz. M 1 Flatbed, M 2 Ridge and Furrow, and M 3 Raised<br />

bed in the main plot, whereas, four levels <strong>of</strong> Cropping system viz, S1: Maize-Linseed, S2:<br />

Maize- Mustard, S 3: Maize- Lentil, S 4: Maize-Chickpea in subplots. Maize is sown in 1 st week<br />

<strong>of</strong> July whereas, rabi crops are sown 3 -10 th <strong>of</strong> October every year <strong>of</strong> the experimentation. A<br />

Fertilizer dose was applied as per the recommendation <strong>of</strong> the package and practices. The full<br />

dose <strong>of</strong> Phosphorus as di-ammonium phosphate (DAP) and potassium as murate <strong>of</strong> potash<br />

(MOP) was applied as basal on the day <strong>of</strong> sowing. The grain, stover, and biological yield were<br />

128 | Page Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

recorded as per treatments and expressed in q ha -1 . The economics was calculated as per<br />

standard procedures.<br />

Results<br />

Maize-rabi crops sown on raised bed produced significantly higher maize equivalent yield<br />

(93.13 q/ha), system return (Rs 123543/ha), and B: C ratio (2.34) over ridge and furrow sown<br />

and flatbed sown crop. Different tillage practices are suitable for in-situ moisture conservation<br />

such viz, ridge and furrow system, zero tillage, raised beds, broad beds are pr<strong>of</strong>itable (Rejani<br />

et al., 2017 and Hariom et al., 2013). Conservation tillage techniques, which involve soilsurface<br />

crop residue management systems with minimum or no tillage (Kar et al. 2021) are<br />

widely accepted as sustainable crop management that reduces soil and water losses, restores<br />

organic matter, increases biodiversity and fertility in degraded agriculture soils (Novara et al.<br />

2021).Maize–Mustard sequence sown on raised bed recorded significantly higher maize<br />

equivalent yield (102.10 q/ha), system return (Rs 135297), system B: C ratio (2.60), and system<br />

RWUE (13.32 kg/ha-mm) but found at par with Maize–Chickpea sequence sown on a raised<br />

bed. Similarly, Hariom et al., 2013. Reported that raised bed planting with residues is helpful<br />

for water stress management in addition to their other advantages. The surface soil moisture<br />

content at maize harvest was 7.87 and 6.67% higher in a Raised bed and Ridge & Furrow over<br />

a Flatbed whereas, subsurface moisture was 18.90 and 18.23% higher. Similarly, after the<br />

harvest <strong>of</strong> rabi crops surface soil moisture content was 15.87 and 9.64 % higher in the Raised<br />

bed and Ridge & Furrow over the Flatbed whereas subsurface moisture was 27.90 and 23.95<br />

% higher over the flatbed.<br />

Conclusion<br />

It may be concluded that the Maize–Mustard sequence sown on raised bed recorded<br />

significantly higher maize equivalent yield, system return, system B: C ratio, and system<br />

RWUE and retained higher soil moisture content.<br />

References<br />

Choudhary S., Pramanick B., Maitra S. and Kumar B. (2021) Tillage Practices for Enhancing<br />

Crop Productivity under Dryland Conditions, Just agriculture newsletter, 1:5.<br />

Hariom, Ansari M.A., and Rana K.S. (2013) Productivity and nutrient uptake <strong>of</strong> mustard<br />

influenced by land configuration and residual and directly applied nutrients in mustard<br />

under limited moisture conditions. Indian Journal <strong>of</strong> Agricultural Sciences 83 (9): 933-<br />

938.<br />

Kar, S., Pramanick, B., Brahmachari, K., Saha, G., Mahapatra, B.S., Saha, A. and Kumar, A.<br />

(2021) Exploring the best tillage option in rice based diversified cropping systems in<br />

alluvial soil <strong>of</strong> eastern India. Soil and Tillage Research, 205(104761): 1-10.<br />

Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance<br />

129 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Novara A., Cerda A., Barone E., and Gristina L. (2021) Cover crop management and water<br />

conservation in vineyard and olive orchards. Soil & Tillage Research, 208 (6):104896<br />

Rejani R., Rao K.V., Osman M., Chary G.R., Reddy K.S. and Asrao C.S. (2015). Location<br />

specific insitu soil and water sustainable management <strong>of</strong> drylands. Journal <strong>of</strong><br />

Agrometeorology 17 (1): 55-60<br />

Effect <strong>of</strong> Moisture conservation practices (Tillage) and cropping system on maize<br />

equivalent yield (q/ha) and System return (Mean data 2016-2020)<br />

Treatments<br />

Maize<br />

yield<br />

(q/ha)<br />

Rabi crop<br />

yield<br />

(q/ha)<br />

Moisture conservation Practices (Main plot)<br />

Maize<br />

equivalent<br />

yield (q/ha)<br />

System<br />

net return<br />

(Rs/ha)<br />

B: C<br />

ratio<br />

System<br />

RWUE<br />

kg/ha-mm<br />

Flat bed 39.98 7.80 65.19 87047 1.75 8.54<br />

Ridge and Furrow 57.63 9.31 88.32 117379 2.23 11.52<br />

Raised bed 61.45 9.57 93.13 123543 2.34 12.14<br />

S Em 0.68 0.09 0.71 1014 0.02 0.10<br />

CD (P=0.05) 2.66 0.36 2.79 3983 0.08 0.38<br />

Cropping System (Subplot)<br />

Maize-Linseed 53.12 6.46 70.52 93907 1.83 9.21<br />

Maize-Mustard 51.86 14.73 92.02 122153 2.39 12.02<br />

Maize- Lentil 53.13 6.87 78.68 104736 1.93 10.28<br />

Maize- Chick pea 53.97 7.51 87.64 116496 2.28 11.43<br />

S Em 0.54 0.10 0.68 958 0.02 0.09<br />

CD (P=0.05) 1.60 0.29 2.03 2847 0.06 0.27<br />

Interaction AxB AxB AxB AxB NS NS<br />

Interaction effect <strong>of</strong> Moisture conservation practices (Tillage) and cropping system on<br />

maize equivalent yield (q/ha) (mean 2016-2020)<br />

Treatments<br />

Maize-<br />

Linseed<br />

Maize-<br />

Mustard<br />

Maize-<br />

Lentil<br />

Maize- Chick<br />

pea<br />

Mean<br />

Flat bed 54.47 76.59 62.08 67.64 65.19<br />

Ridge &Furrow 77.01 97.38 84.25 94.65 88.32<br />

Raised bed 80.09 102.10 89.72 100.62 93.13<br />

Mean 70.52 92.02 78.68 87.64<br />

CD (P=0.05)<br />

S Em <br />

Factor A (MCP) 2.79 0.71<br />

Factor B (Cropping system) 2.03 0.68<br />

Factor(B) at same level <strong>of</strong> A 3.51 1.18<br />

Factor(A) at same level <strong>of</strong> B 4.09 1.25<br />

130 | Page Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Interaction effect <strong>of</strong> Moisture conservation practices (Tillage) and cropping system on<br />

system net return (Rs/ha) (mean 2016-2020)<br />

Treatments<br />

Maize-Linseed<br />

Maize-<br />

Mustard<br />

Maize- Lentil<br />

Maize-Chick<br />

pea<br />

Mean<br />

Flat bed 72883 101930 82999 90376 87047<br />

Ridge & Furrow 102537 129233 112038 125710 117379<br />

Raised bed 106303 135297 119172 133402 123543<br />

Mean 93907 122153 104736 116496<br />

Factor<br />

(MCP)<br />

A<br />

Factor<br />

(Cropping<br />

system)<br />

CD (P=0.05) 3983 1014<br />

2847 958<br />

4931 1660<br />

B<br />

Factor(B) at<br />

same level <strong>of</strong> A<br />

Factor(A)<br />

at same<br />

level <strong>of</strong> B<br />

5786 1759 S Em <br />

Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance<br />

T1-51 P-1383<br />

Evaluation <strong>of</strong> Cherry Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiformae)<br />

Cultivars under Hydroponics for Growth, Yield, and Quality Parameters<br />

Harendra Kumar*, Ankur Agarwal, Pradeep Kr. Yadav, Om Prakash, Basant Ballabh<br />

and Devkanta P. Singh<br />

Defence Institute <strong>of</strong> Bio Energy Research (DIBER), DRDO, Goraparao – 263 139<br />

Haldwani, Distt. Nainital, (Uttarakhand)<br />

*harendrahorti26@gmail.com<br />

Hydroponics system for vegetable crop production has shown tremendous potential for<br />

increasing crop productivity and improving quality. Globally, hydroponics technology has<br />

been accepted as sustainable technology to tackle all issues being reported in conventional<br />

agriculture system especially residual toxicity, water and nutrient loss and environmental<br />

issues. DIBER (DRDO) has been instrumental in standardizing the technology <strong>of</strong> hydroponics<br />

for various crop from snow bound hilly regions to Antarctica. In recent years, cherry tomato<br />

(Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme) has gained lot <strong>of</strong> importance due to higher<br />

antioxidant activity, higher yield and premium price in selected market. This experiment was<br />

conducted during 2021-22 at DIBER, DRDO, Haldwani, Nainital (Uttarakhand). The objective<br />

<strong>of</strong> this study was to evaluate the Performance <strong>of</strong> cherry tomato cultivars under hydroponics<br />

culture. The Nursery <strong>of</strong> tomato was raised in the portrays during the month <strong>of</strong> September 2021<br />

and 30 days old seedlings were transplanted. The results revealed that performance <strong>of</strong> cherry<br />

tomato cultivar Serina and Esterina differed significantly on growth, yield and quality<br />

131 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

attributing traits. The observations were recorded on plant height, number <strong>of</strong> fruit/clusters,<br />

number <strong>of</strong> clusters/plants, Number <strong>of</strong> branches/plant, fruit girth, fruit length, pericarp<br />

thickness, Total yield, Carbohydrate content, protein content, Vit. C (mg/100g.), Tannin<br />

content (mg/ 100 g.), phenol (mg/100 g), Flavonoid content (mg/100g.). Esterina cultivar<br />

exhibited the highest value for plant height (370 cm), number <strong>of</strong> fruit/ cluster (22), number <strong>of</strong><br />

cluster/plant (18.66), Total yield (4680.00g/plant), Tannin (7.49 mg/ 100 g.), Phenol (394.66<br />

mg/100 g), and Flavonoid content (4.91mg/100g.). Serina cultivar exhibited the highest value<br />

for Number <strong>of</strong> branch/plant (3.66), fruit girth (3.42 cm), fruit length (3.86 cm), pericarp<br />

thickness (4.16 mm), Carbohydrate (6.33 g/100g), protein (1.78 g/100g), Vit. C (18.68<br />

mg/100g.).<br />

T1-52 P-1307<br />

Impact Assessment <strong>of</strong> Farm Pond on Demand Scheme <strong>of</strong> Maharashtra<br />

S. Gireesh*, N.V.Kumbhare, R.N.Padaria, R.R. Burman, Pramod Kumar,<br />

Arpan Bhoumik and Shiv Prasad<br />

ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute<br />

* gireeagri@gmail.com<br />

Farm pond is considered as the best alternative for irrigation source for efficient rain water<br />

management to improve productivity and protect the natural resource base in rainfed region.<br />

Maharashtra falls under the medium to high water stress category in terms <strong>of</strong> water availability.<br />

Considering the situation, Maharashtra govt was launched programme called farm pond on<br />

demand (Magel Tyala Shettale) in 2016 to enhance the irrigation potential for the benefit <strong>of</strong> the<br />

farming community.<br />

Methodology<br />

The study was conducted in purposively selected Vidarbha and Marathwada region <strong>of</strong><br />

Maharashtra, considering major drought affected area. From each region two districts<br />

(Aurangabad & Jalna districts from Marathwada) and (Yavatmal & Buldhana districts from<br />

Vidarbha) were selected purposively. From each district two block and four villages were<br />

selected randomly. Twenty (20) respondents from each village including farm pond<br />

beneficiaries and non-beneficiaries were selected randomly. There were 80 respondents from<br />

one district. Hence, a total <strong>of</strong> 320 respondents from four districts were constituted the sample<br />

<strong>of</strong> the study.<br />

Results<br />

The study revealed that 100 per cent beneficiaries had large size farm pond, among only 5 per<br />

cent <strong>of</strong> the respondents constructed ponds as per govt. guidelines and harvesting water (5 %)<br />

from rain. Most <strong>of</strong> the respondents (72.50 %) farm ponds were 3 to 5 years old, and 70.63 per<br />

132 | Page Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

cent farm ponds had irrigation potential throughout the year with cultivated area <strong>of</strong> 2 to 3 ha.<br />

The state government exceeded its goal <strong>of</strong> building 1,35,257 farm ponds; the original goal was<br />

to build 1,12,311; Aurangabad and Amravati divisions met their goal and had the most farm<br />

ponds <strong>of</strong> any district in Maharashtra. The majority <strong>of</strong> beneficiaries (86.75 %) used farm pond<br />

water during rabi season, followed by summer season (70.63 %), adopted drip (68.75%) and<br />

sprinkler (18.75%) methods <strong>of</strong> irrigation for horticulture crops, and used sprinkler (51.25%)<br />

and manual (28.75%) methods <strong>of</strong> irrigation for vegetables. Only 23.75 per cent <strong>of</strong> beneficiaries<br />

were aware <strong>of</strong> the critical stages <strong>of</strong> irrigation and the irrigation schedule (75.63%). A little over<br />

33.75 per cent <strong>of</strong> them adopted, and 15 per cent <strong>of</strong> them stopped fishing following adoption.<br />

Majority respondents (49.38%) were observed in medium level <strong>of</strong> sustainability followed by<br />

high (31.25%) and low (19.37%) level <strong>of</strong> sustainability, respectively. The value <strong>of</strong> enterprises<br />

cost effectiveness index (ECEI) <strong>of</strong> major crops increased from 17.27 to 48.83 among<br />

beneficiaries and cultivated land utilisation index (CLUI) was found significant (1% level) in<br />

all major crops except sorghum and pearl millet. The coarsened exact matching method was<br />

done to know impact <strong>of</strong> farm pond on beneficiaries, it is found that overall income i.e 16,946.4<br />

and HHI index (0.052) was found significant at 1 % level. The analysis <strong>of</strong> logit regression<br />

result revealed that variables like dairy animal, fishery, income, income log, percentage <strong>of</strong><br />

irrigation area and HHI were found significant at 1% level and it is also found that beneficiaries<br />

investing more in horticulture component (Mean±SD, 401) followed by animal component<br />

(Mean±SD, 360) and less in maintenance <strong>of</strong> farm pond (Mean±SD,136). The majority <strong>of</strong><br />

beneficiaries (56.88%) used farm pond income to buy input, followed by buying farm<br />

equipment (18.13%) and lending money to others (1.25%), with an overall shift in<br />

beneficiaries' means <strong>of</strong> subsistence reported at 84.09%.<br />

Beneficiaries' top three perceived obstacles were Government funding for the farm pond was<br />

not fully covered, and the farm pond's shorter lifespan or lower output were caused by the<br />

adoption <strong>of</strong> less durable building materials. Major challenges faced by the respondent included<br />

a lack <strong>of</strong> labour, inadequate family labour, a lack <strong>of</strong> owned resources, low rainfall, unusual<br />

weather, a high rate <strong>of</strong> evaporation, high costs for building and maintaining the ponds, and a<br />

lack <strong>of</strong> credit facilities. Major perceived factors for discontinued farm ponds included: Draining<br />

a bore well or well used to store water in a farm pond is followed by a reduction in the<br />

productivity or lifespan <strong>of</strong> the farm pond, an inadequate or low water harvest, an insufficient<br />

amount <strong>of</strong> family labour, Low and prolonged rainfall.<br />

Conclusion<br />

Given the importance <strong>of</strong> farm ponds, the government should concentrate on maintaining the<br />

programme and extending benefits to small and marginal farmers, as well as making changes<br />

to the way subsidies are provided. Also, strict guidelines need to be put in place to prevent<br />

groundwater extraction for storage in farm ponds.<br />

Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance<br />

133 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

T1-53 P-1503<br />

Impact <strong>of</strong> Soil and Water Conservation Interventions on The Livelihood <strong>of</strong><br />

Tribal Farmers from The Hilly Area <strong>of</strong> Palghar District<br />

Pavan Jadhav 1 , D. Divate Anuja 2 and M. Jadhav Vilas 2<br />

1 Deepak foundation, Mokhada<br />

2 Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Kosbad Hill, Palghar 401703<br />

Palghar is a tribal district <strong>of</strong> the Maharashtra state and has eight talukas having 1008 villages<br />

and household size is 5-6. The economy and livelihood <strong>of</strong> the tribal people <strong>of</strong> Palghar District,<br />

Maharashtra is primarily based on rainfed agriculture and forest. The various livelihood<br />

activities include agricultural cultivation wage labour (farm and non-farm labour), collection<br />

<strong>of</strong> minor forest products, fishing, liquor brewing and selling, job/service, and businesses. The<br />

land holding pattern <strong>of</strong> the community ranges from 0.05 to 1.0 ha while the yielding capacity<br />

<strong>of</strong> agricultural land is very low poor economic status <strong>of</strong> farmers in the hilly region due to lack<br />

<strong>of</strong> irrigation facility, more soil erosion, undulating topography, no proper use <strong>of</strong> modern<br />

technology, lack <strong>of</strong> knowledge about water and soil conservation etc. District receiving annual<br />

rainfall <strong>of</strong> about 3000 mm during monsoon still farmers face the shortage <strong>of</strong> water in rabi and<br />

summer season. Hence, Rabi cultivation is almost lacking as well as very little scope for the<br />

diversification <strong>of</strong> crops. Therefore, many young boys and girls even the adults have migrated<br />

to cities and out <strong>of</strong> state for work; they are forced to do unsociable activities. This large-scale<br />

migration has a negative impact on the family’s health and the children’s education which<br />

directly affect the livelihood standards <strong>of</strong> tribal families. Assessment <strong>of</strong> soil and water<br />

management in agriculture describes a large untapped potential for upgrading rainfed<br />

agriculture and calls for increased water investments in the sector (Molden et al., 2007;<br />

Rockström et al., 2007). Therefore, rainwater harvesting and the adoption <strong>of</strong> soil conservation<br />

measures solve the stated problems in some extent. The present paper/ study conducted on<br />

reviewing the Impact <strong>of</strong> soil and water conservation interventions on the livelihood <strong>of</strong> tribal<br />

farmers from the hilly area <strong>of</strong> the Palghar district.<br />

Methodology<br />

The present work was conducted from September 2018 to July 2022 in the Dhamani,<br />

Brahmangoan, Kalamgoan, Beriste, Ase, Karoli and Bavalpada villages <strong>of</strong> Mokhada tahsil <strong>of</strong><br />

Palghar district. The villages under the IVDP project were selected in consultation with District<br />

Administration based on the status <strong>of</strong> the migration, forest cover, crop productivity, the status<br />

<strong>of</strong> livelihood, health, education status, etc. A primary baseline survey <strong>of</strong> 1128 households were<br />

conducted in the selected villages through the questionaries to know the framer’s soicoeconomic<br />

condition. Defined soil and water conservation measures construction <strong>of</strong> CCT, farm<br />

ponds, cultivation <strong>of</strong> fruits crop on CCT, gravity-based drip irrigation system, recharging pit,<br />

134 | Page Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

ground water recharge <strong>of</strong> existing wells, and construction <strong>of</strong> new wells were implemented in<br />

the project area. After the successful implementation <strong>of</strong> interventions, interviews were<br />

conducted with farmers who applied soil and water conservation measure to assess the impact<br />

on crop productivity, environment, migration and employment generation household security,<br />

and socio-economic status.<br />

Results<br />

The selected villages have mainly two types <strong>of</strong> cropping patterns mainly cereal-pulses (Paddy-<br />

Finger millet- Little Millet- Udid- Tur) based cropping pattern and another is horticulture-based<br />

cropping pattern. Technological intervention for the cultivation <strong>of</strong> paddy and finger millet by<br />

SRI methods showed an improvement in crop productivity. The findings <strong>of</strong> the project showed<br />

that crop productivity <strong>of</strong> paddy and finger millet crops increased by 29 % and 19-20 %<br />

respectively. A total area <strong>of</strong> 566.5 ha <strong>of</strong> land comes under horticulture cultivation. After 4-5<br />

years cultivated fruit crops will start to produce fruits. Thereby, farmers will get a fixed income<br />

by selling fruits as well as providing nutritional security to farmers. Similar Findings were<br />

reported by (Gore, et al.2000, Ranade et al. 1995). The findings <strong>of</strong> the survey revealed that<br />

68.3% <strong>of</strong> the households migrated in search <strong>of</strong> employment either within the district (48.7%)<br />

or to other big cities (44.3%) like Mumbai & Nasik from the month <strong>of</strong> November to May. Soil<br />

and water conservation structures like CCT, farm pond, gravity-based drip irrigation system,<br />

jasmine cultivation etc resulted positive impact by creating employment generation at villages<br />

level. Through soil and water conservation measure interventions was able to mobilize more<br />

than 3000 human days <strong>of</strong> work to build across water conservation structures covering hundreds<br />

<strong>of</strong> acres <strong>of</strong> land. As a response, the people were incentivized with cash for their contribution to<br />

the initiative. Jasmine cultivation results more economical fulsheti model. It includes the<br />

cultivation <strong>of</strong> 220 jasmine plants on 500 sq. m (0.05 ha) <strong>of</strong> land, with an investment <strong>of</strong> Rs.<br />

3,000. Additional income <strong>of</strong> the some <strong>of</strong> the farmer has been raised by Rs. 30000 - 35000 per<br />

year by growing <strong>of</strong> jasmine using water <strong>of</strong> farm pond through gravity-based drip irrigation<br />

system. Hence the initiative was helpful in reducing migration up to 26% in all the 7 target<br />

villages.<br />

Soil and water conservation measures constructed under project indicated the increase in<br />

moisture content in soil/regime, ground water level. Also harvested rainwater can recycle for<br />

irrigation in rabi and summer seasons. Near about 12.77 lit water is conserved through CCT,<br />

farm ponds, recharge pit etc. It was found that water table <strong>of</strong> the open well was found increased<br />

by 0.5-1.0 m. The water retention period in the open well as well as in the nalas located at<br />

foothills was found to increase by 30-45 days during the observation period. To promote<br />

household food security a seasonal calendar <strong>of</strong> locally available vegetables was prepared and<br />

seed kits comprising seeds <strong>of</strong> location-specific seasonal vegetables from all three vegetable<br />

groups viz., green leafy vegetables, roots and tubers and other vegetables along with fruit<br />

Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance<br />

135 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

sampling were given to the families. Implementation <strong>of</strong> defined soil and water conservation<br />

deliverable in the field and garden <strong>of</strong> households showed positive benefits in terms <strong>of</strong> health<br />

by improving quality <strong>of</strong> diet. Migration for survival is another important factor that affect food<br />

security in the targeted area. Availability water in rabi season due to soil and water conservation<br />

measures results in employment generation through jasmine cultivation, vegetable cultivation<br />

etc and this intervention helps to stop the migration <strong>of</strong> households in some extent. Total 132<br />

Farmers adopting jasmine cultivation with use <strong>of</strong> drip irrigation system has raised additional<br />

income 30000-40000 per year and 450 farmers adopted fruit cultivation which will give<br />

additional income in the coming years. Farmers get additional one more crop and good yield<br />

with minimum resources. Increased income enables a better life in terms <strong>of</strong> better food, clothes,<br />

education, health etc. A number <strong>of</strong> capacity-building training programmes and demonstrations<br />

<strong>of</strong> soil and water conservation technologies brought awareness among the farming community<br />

for the conservation <strong>of</strong> soil and water resources and utilization <strong>of</strong> water for crop production<br />

and crop diversification. Adopted measures have helped in improving livelihood among the<br />

farming community <strong>of</strong> the region. Vegetable grown in their kitchen garden is improving their<br />

quality <strong>of</strong> life.<br />

Conclusion<br />

Small soil and water conservation structures and effective use <strong>of</strong> harvested water through micro<br />

irrigation systems at field level were found effective in improving productivity and crop<br />

diversification. It was evident from the work done under programme that the cultivation <strong>of</strong><br />

suitable crops/varieties by following improved management practices, jasmine cultivation<br />

could help to produce sufficient for feeding the family and additional income respectively. It<br />

resulted in an increase in the annual income <strong>of</strong> the farmers <strong>of</strong> the village. Also, the migration<br />

percentage <strong>of</strong> the people <strong>of</strong> the village in search <strong>of</strong> jobs was reduced. It was observed that there<br />

was an overall improvement in the livelihood status <strong>of</strong> farmers in the area. Hence it is also<br />

recommended that concerned agencies like Agriculture/Horticulture/Forestry line departments,<br />

NGO and private etc may take serious steps towards upscaling measures <strong>of</strong> soil and water<br />

conservation and the conservation <strong>of</strong> forests.<br />

The authors would like to thank to Dr, Jai Pawar Director Deepak Foundation or advisory<br />

support as and when required, during project implementation and Mr. Sunil Karale Assistant<br />

Vice President JM Financial Foundation for financial support under companies CSR Fund.<br />

References<br />

Gore, K. P., Pendke, M. S. and Jallawar, D. N. 2000. Impact assessment <strong>of</strong> soil and water<br />

conservation structure in Darakwadi watershed, Karnataka. J. agric. Sci., 13(3): 676-<br />

681.<br />

136 | Page Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Molden, D., Karen Frenken, Randolph Barker et al. 2007. Trends in water and agricultural<br />

development. In Water for food, water for life: A comprehensive assessment <strong>of</strong> water<br />

management in agriculture, ed. D. Molden, 56–89. London, UK: Earthscan; and<br />

Colombo, Sri Lanka: International Water Management Institute<br />

Monica Singh & Sandeep Deshmukh et.al.2022. Gender and livelihood analysis <strong>of</strong> the tribal<br />

farm families. The Pharma Innovation Journal 2022; SP-11(10): 1570-1573<br />

Ranade, D. H., Chourasia, M. C., Gupta, R. K., Upadhyay, M. S. and Nema, R. S. 1995. Integrated<br />

approach for increased agricultural productivity in dry land areas <strong>of</strong> vertisols. Indian J. Soil.<br />

Cons., 23 (1): 30-33<br />

Rockström, J., Louise Karlberg, S.P. Wani et al. 2010. Managing water in rainfed agriculture – The<br />

need for a paradigm shift. Agri Water Manag. 97:543–550.<br />

Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance<br />

T1-54P-1755<br />

Application Technologies for Harvested Rainwater in Ponds: Issues and<br />

Prospects<br />

M. Kumar, R. V. Adake, K. Sammi Reddy and V.K. Singh<br />

Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, Santoshnagar, Saidabad (PO), Hyderabad-500<br />

059<br />

Rainwater harvesting in farm ponds for supplemental irrigation are considered as an important<br />

strategy in present day dryland farming. These are promoted through various development<br />

programs as a drought pro<strong>of</strong>ing strategy. However, the lifting technologies for the shallow<br />

depth farm ponds are rarely discussed. The present paper takes the account <strong>of</strong> present status <strong>of</strong><br />

application technologies; describe different prevailing water lifting techniques used in different<br />

part <strong>of</strong> India, discuss issues associated with current water utilization techniques.<br />

Rainwater harvesting in farm ponds for supplemental irrigation is an important strategy for<br />

stabilizing yields <strong>of</strong> rainfed crops. Farm ponds are promoted in the integrated watershed<br />

programs and under MGNREGS as a drought pro<strong>of</strong>ing strategy. More recently, farm ponds<br />

are integrated with micro-irrigation programs under the National Horticulture Mission,<br />

particularly in states like Maharashtra and Andhra Pradesh. With continued over-exploitation<br />

<strong>of</strong> groundwater, it is important to use surface water harvested as surplus run<strong>of</strong>f in dug out<br />

ponds, either as standalone resource or in conjunction with groundwater for enhancing water<br />

productivity, particularly in arid and semi-arid regions.<br />

Water Harvesting and utilization in agriculture: Indian Experience<br />

In view <strong>of</strong> the agricultural scenario <strong>of</strong> Indian rural settings, there is a shift in paradigm from<br />

ground water recharge to small size surface water harvesting and recycling to agriculture to<br />

attain sufficient soil moisture for successful crop production. The intervention <strong>of</strong> water<br />

137 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

harvesting enables to increase the cropping intensity substantially and thus increase farm<br />

income. The average productivity <strong>of</strong> 1.0 t/ha <strong>of</strong> dryland agriculture could be doubled easily by<br />

providing 1 or 2 irrigation. The major impediments in realizing the potential <strong>of</strong> water<br />

harvesting and recycling in dryland agriculture is however, the economical and effective means<br />

to lift water and distribute the same at the field. The existing means <strong>of</strong> lifting pumps is grossly<br />

mismatched because its turns to be over designed in view <strong>of</strong> small size water harvesting ponds<br />

(usually <strong>of</strong> capacity up to 1000 m 3 ). Moreover, the lifting pump depends upon the supply <strong>of</strong><br />

either electricity or fossil fuels. Thus, the affordability <strong>of</strong> this means to the small and marginal<br />

farmers is a major concern. To avoid the economic liabilities associated with lifting pump and<br />

increase the pr<strong>of</strong>itability from limited land and climate resources, this class <strong>of</strong> farmers usually<br />

goes for hand watering <strong>of</strong> crop by fetching water as head load. This consumes lot <strong>of</strong> time along<br />

with physical labour. The present innovation is proved as the economical and efficient<br />

alternative to the water lifting and high-pressure requiring irrigation system. The present<br />

innovation is a perfect match between the water available and area under command can be<br />

extensively used for small scale vegetable production that improve quality <strong>of</strong> life by means <strong>of</strong><br />

providing food and nutritional security along with income generation.<br />

Issues associated to current water utilization techniques<br />

The wastage occurring through storage, conveyance and distribution ultimately result in<br />

delivery <strong>of</strong> 30 to 35 % <strong>of</strong> stored water for plant uptake (Patil 1988). The traditional flood or<br />

ridge and furrow method <strong>of</strong> irrigating field suffers from numerous problems such as<br />

considerable seepage (Moolman 1985, Hodgson et al 1990, Kahlown and Kemper 2004),<br />

conveyance and evaporation loss (Singh et al 2006); higher energy cost; lower water<br />

productivity; irrigation-induced soil erosion (Gomez et al 2004), and leaching <strong>of</strong> costly<br />

agricultural inputs causing sub-surface water pollution (Humphreys et al 1989). Moreover, this<br />

method is supply driven rather than crop-demand driven causing mismatch between need <strong>of</strong><br />

the crop and the quantity <strong>of</strong> water supplied. The decrease in the availability <strong>of</strong> water for<br />

agriculture, coupled with the requirement for the higher agricultural productivity, means that<br />

there is no option but to improve the water use efficiency. This has to include an efficient<br />

utilization <strong>of</strong> available water which otherwise would evaporate or percolate from the root zone<br />

<strong>of</strong> the soil.<br />

The recent advances in irrigation technology have made inroads in the cultivation <strong>of</strong> vegetables<br />

and horticultural crops. The frontier technology <strong>of</strong> micro-irrigation system not only provides<br />

higher water productivity but also minimize the problems associated with the traditional<br />

irrigation system. However, these irrigation systems work best with ground water and so its<br />

expansion concerns a lot. So there is a need to address the issue <strong>of</strong> suitable irrigation system<br />

for pond water. The issues are<br />

138 | Page Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

Water lifting techniques: The difference between water lifting methods from bore well and<br />

open source lies in the fact that bore well requires minimum suction head <strong>of</strong> 40 m whereas<br />

open source pond require only 5 meters. The pump for pond water should have higher<br />

delivery/suction ratio to achieve higher system efficiency.<br />

Pump sizes: Suitable pump sizes are needed to develop by keeping in view that the capacity<br />

<strong>of</strong> farm pond barely crosses 2000 m 3 , and hence higher capacity pump will be brought<br />

mismatch causing low system efficiency and higher investment.<br />

Standardization <strong>of</strong> command area under farm pond: The experience suggests that farm pond<br />

<strong>of</strong> size 30m X 30 m X 3 will be able to provide adequate irrigation to 1 acre <strong>of</strong> land. Hence<br />

the pumping requirement would not be more than 1.5 hp. These needs to be standardize for<br />

different capacity <strong>of</strong> pond and respective command for optimal use efficiency.<br />

Selection <strong>of</strong> Crop: The selection <strong>of</strong> crop is highly crucial to achieve the water productivity<br />

and pr<strong>of</strong>itability.<br />

References<br />

Gómez R. Fernández, L. Mateos and J. V. Giráldez, 2004. “Furrow irrigation erosion and<br />

management”. Irri. Sci., Vol. 23 Number 3<br />

Hodgson A. S., G. A. Constable, G. R. Duddy and I. G. Daniells, 1990. “A comparison <strong>of</strong> drip and<br />

furrow irrigated cotton on a cracking clay soil”. Irri. Sci., Vol. 11 Number 3<br />

Humphreys E., F. M. Melhuish, W. A. Muirhead, R. J. G. White, J. Blackwell and P. M. Chalk,<br />

1989. “The growth and nitrogen economy <strong>of</strong> rice under sprinkler and flood irrigation in<br />

South East Australia”. Irri. Sci., Vol. 10, Number 4<br />

Kahlown, M.A. and W.D. Kemper, 2004. “Seepage losses as affected by condition and composition<br />

<strong>of</strong> channel bank”. Agric. Wat. Manage. Volume 65, Issue 2.<br />

Moolmam J. H., 1985. “The effect <strong>of</strong> a change in irrigation water quality on the salt load <strong>of</strong> the<br />

deep percolate <strong>of</strong> a saline sodic soil — a computer simulation study”. Irri. Sci., Vol. 6,<br />

Number 1<br />

Patil R. K., 1988. “Experiences <strong>of</strong> farmer participation in irrigation management: Mula command<br />

Maharashtra State”. India, Irri. and Drain. Sys., Vol. 2, Number 1<br />

Singh, R., J.G. Kroes, J.C. van Dam and R.A. Freddes, 2006. “Distributed ecohydrological<br />

modelling to evaluate the performance <strong>of</strong> irrigation system in Sirsa district, India: I. Current<br />

water management and its productivity”. Journal <strong>of</strong> Hydrology Volume 329, Issues 3-4<br />

Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance<br />

139 | Page


Theme– 2<br />

Ecosystem based approaches for climate<br />

change adaptation, ecosystem services,<br />

integrated farming system models, Land<br />

degradation neutrality


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Theme – 2: Ecosystem-based approaches for climate change<br />

adaptation, ecosystem services, integrated farming system models,<br />

Land degradation neutrality<br />

List <strong>of</strong> <strong>Extended</strong> Summaries<br />

Sl. No Title First Author ID<br />

1 Diversification <strong>of</strong> crops and cropping systems<br />

resilience to climate variability in rainfed agroecosystems<br />

<strong>of</strong> Odisha<br />

2 Mainstreaming agro biodiversity – an integrated<br />

approach to improve nutrition, livelihoods,<br />

ecosystem services and reduce climate vulnerability<br />

3 Ecosystem based cropping system for climate<br />

change adaptation – An experience from Odisha<br />

Millets Mission<br />

4 Integrated Farming System Approach for<br />

Sustainable Development <strong>of</strong> Small and Marginal<br />

Farmers <strong>of</strong> India<br />

5 Enhancing System Productivity <strong>of</strong> Farmers through<br />

Rainfed Integrated Farming Systems in Shivalik<br />

Foothills <strong>of</strong> Punjab<br />

6 Livelihood sustainability <strong>of</strong> rainfed farmers: Impact<br />

<strong>of</strong> various fodder based cropping systems in rainfed<br />

regions <strong>of</strong> Telangana<br />

7 Quantification <strong>of</strong> ecosystem services from<br />

multifunctional agr<strong>of</strong>orestry established for family<br />

farming in Tamil Nadu<br />

8 Performance Evaluation <strong>of</strong> Ghungroo under<br />

Backyard Piggery Farming in South Garo Hills,<br />

Meghalaya - An Approach for Climate Change<br />

Adaptation.<br />

9 Documenting India’s Rainfed Mixed Indigenous<br />

Cropping Systems’ Features and Design<br />

SK Behera<br />

Jai C Rana<br />

Susanta Sekhar<br />

Chaudhury<br />

Ayesha Fatima<br />

Balwinder Singh<br />

Dhillon<br />

V Visha Kumari<br />

A Keerthika<br />

Rupam<br />

Bhattacharjya<br />

Prachi Patil<br />

T2-01O-1110<br />

T2-02O-1163<br />

T2-03O<br />

T2-04O<br />

T2-05R-1052<br />

T2-06R-1116<br />

T2-07R-1128<br />

T2-08R-1136<br />

T2-09R-1216<br />

10 Akkadi : A Sustainable Livelihood Cropping System<br />

in Raichur District <strong>of</strong> Karnataka<br />

11 Carbon sequestration as a major regulating<br />

ecosystem services from dryland agr<strong>of</strong>orestry<br />

systems<br />

12 Integrated farming for food and nutrition security <strong>of</strong><br />

small farmers besides making the system self-reliant<br />

13 Rainfed Integrated Farming System (RIFS) Model<br />

for Assured rainfall Zone <strong>of</strong> Marathwada Region<br />

14 Maize and blackgram strip-intercropping system for<br />

higher productivity and economics under rainfed<br />

Lokappa Nayak<br />

KB Sridhar<br />

B Bhargavi<br />

RS Raut<br />

Anil Khokhar<br />

T2-10R-1264<br />

T2-11R-1559<br />

T2-11aR-1591<br />

T2-12R-1626<br />

T2-13P-1036<br />

140 | Page<br />

Ecosystem based approaches for climate change adaptation, ecosystem services, integrated farming system models,<br />

Land degradation neutrality


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Sl. No Title First Author ID<br />

conditions<br />

15 Influence <strong>of</strong> crop geometry and plant growth<br />

regulators on production potential <strong>of</strong> Pigeon pea<br />

(Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.)<br />

16 Yield and Biological Efficiencies <strong>of</strong> Millet based<br />

Intercropping Systems under Dryland Conditions at<br />

Bastar Plateau Zone <strong>of</strong> Chhattisgarh<br />

SU Pawar<br />

Ashwani Kumar<br />

Thakur<br />

T2-14P-1073<br />

T2-15P-1112<br />

17 Effect <strong>of</strong> Mechanization Practices on Economics <strong>of</strong><br />

Soyabean-Safflower<br />

Cropping System<br />

18 Performance and adaptability <strong>of</strong> different improved<br />

variety <strong>of</strong> backyard poultry in Garhwa district <strong>of</strong><br />

Jharkhand<br />

19 Challenges in contemporary Indian agriculture:<br />

Integrated Farming Systems (IFS) for transformation<br />

20 Productivity and pr<strong>of</strong>itability <strong>of</strong> different rabi crops<br />

in maize based cropping systems under rainfed<br />

subtropics <strong>of</strong> Jammu<br />

21 Pr<strong>of</strong>itability <strong>of</strong> Rajmah based intercropping system<br />

under rainfed upland situation <strong>of</strong> Assam<br />

22 Effect <strong>of</strong> sowing windows on production <strong>of</strong> rabi<br />

sorghum (Sorghum bicolour L.) in scarcity zone <strong>of</strong><br />

Maharashtra.<br />

23 Effect <strong>of</strong> sowing windows on production <strong>of</strong> chickpea<br />

(Cicer arietinum L.) in scarcity zone <strong>of</strong> Maharashtra<br />

24 Effect <strong>of</strong> thermal environment on yield <strong>of</strong> tomato<br />

under different microclimatic conditions at Upper<br />

Brahmaputra Valley Zone <strong>of</strong> Assam<br />

25 Natural Resource Management in Rapeseed, Field<br />

pea and Lentil under Senapati District<br />

26 Assessment <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>itable intercropping system for<br />

Alfisols under dryland condition in Eastern Dry<br />

Zone <strong>of</strong> Karnataka<br />

27 Impact <strong>of</strong> Improved Practices in Rainfed Integrated<br />

Farming System on System Productivity and<br />

Employment Generation <strong>of</strong> Rainfed Farmers in<br />

Tumkuru District <strong>of</strong> Karnataka<br />

28 Livestock interventions as an additional source <strong>of</strong><br />

income to rainfed farmers <strong>of</strong> Ananthapuramu<br />

district, Andhra Pradesh<br />

29 Kadaknath poultry farming as an emerging way to<br />

increase farmer’s income in rainfed farming systems<br />

in Jhabua<br />

SA Shinde<br />

Sushma Lalita<br />

Baxla<br />

Marneni Divya<br />

Sree<br />

Rohit Shrama<br />

Nikhilesh Baruah<br />

Vijay<br />

VM Londhe<br />

A Kalia<br />

Dipin<br />

Wangkheimayum<br />

Mudalagiriyappa<br />

HS Latha<br />

K Madhavi<br />

Chandan Kumar<br />

T2-16P-1117<br />

T2-17P-1232<br />

T2-18P-1251<br />

T2-19P-1268<br />

T2-20P-1278<br />

T2-21P-1292<br />

T2-22P-1302<br />

T2-23P-1315<br />

T2-24P-1472<br />

T2-25P-1482<br />

T2-26P-1497<br />

T2-27P-1511<br />

T2-28P-1545<br />

Ecosystem based approaches for climate change adaptation, ecosystem services, integrated farming system<br />

models, Land degradation neutrality<br />

141 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Sl. No Title First Author ID<br />

30 Productivity and pr<strong>of</strong>itability <strong>of</strong> pigeon pea–<br />

vegetable mustard–okra cropping system as<br />

influenced by enriched organic formulations<br />

31 Deep liter Pig Housin- A venture for minimizing<br />

winter stress and other health managemental issues<br />

in piggery farming in West Jaintia Hill district <strong>of</strong><br />

Meghalaya<br />

32 Indigenous Multi Cropping Systems <strong>of</strong> Rainfed<br />

Areas: A Present<br />

33 A review article on comparative performance <strong>of</strong><br />

Vanaraja and Indigenous chicken under backyard<br />

system <strong>of</strong> rearing.<br />

34 Directed Seeded Rice: Prospects, Constraints and<br />

Researchable Issue<br />

35 Ecosystem-based adaptation for increased<br />

agricultural productivity through smallholder<br />

farmers in Ratlam District (M.P.)<br />

36 Effect <strong>of</strong> different legumes in legume-castor relay<br />

cropping system<br />

37 Effect <strong>of</strong> seeding rate on seed yield and yield<br />

components <strong>of</strong> alafalfa (medicago sativa) for<br />

minimizing abiotic stress.<br />

Kamal Garg<br />

Rimiki Suchiang<br />

Prachi D Pati<br />

Nunni Tayeng<br />

Satyendra Pal<br />

Singh<br />

Gyanendra<br />

Pratap Tiwari<br />

SP Deshmukh<br />

S Iqbal<br />

T2-29P-1550<br />

T2-30P-1570<br />

T2-31P<br />

T2-32P<br />

T2-33P<br />

T2-34P<br />

T2-35P<br />

T2-36P<br />

38 Impact <strong>of</strong> climate change on pokkali farming system PA Vikas T2-37P<br />

39 Impact <strong>of</strong> Front Line Demonstration on the Yield<br />

and Economics <strong>of</strong> Coriander under TDC-NICRA in<br />

Kota District <strong>of</strong> Rajasthan, India<br />

40 Impact <strong>of</strong> Onset date <strong>of</strong> monsoon on kharif crops in<br />

Bhadohi district <strong>of</strong> UP.<br />

41 Integrated Farming System module for strengthening<br />

traditional rainfed IFS for small and marginal farm<br />

holdings in Southern zone <strong>of</strong> Tamil Nadu<br />

42 Seasonal Growth Potential and Performance <strong>of</strong><br />

Ramie Fodder Crop (Boehmeria nivea) Under<br />

Extreme Climatic Conditions in North India<br />

43 Impact <strong>of</strong> adaptation technologies on resilience in<br />

drought prone regions <strong>of</strong> Maharashtra, India<br />

Dilip Matwa<br />

Sarvesh<br />

Baranwal<br />

G Guru<br />

Ashutosh<br />

JVNS Prasad<br />

T2-38P<br />

T2-39P<br />

T2-40P<br />

T2-41P<br />

T2-42P-1679<br />

142 | Page<br />

Ecosystem based approaches for climate change adaptation, ecosystem services, integrated farming system models,<br />

Land degradation neutrality


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

T2-01O-1110<br />

Diversification <strong>of</strong> Crops and Cropping Systems Resilience to Climate<br />

Variability in Rainfed AGRO-ecosystems <strong>of</strong> Odisha<br />

S. K. Behera 1* , M. R. Panda 1 andD. K. Bastia 2<br />

1 AICRP for Dryland Agriculture, Odisha University <strong>of</strong> Agriculture and Technology (OUAT), At/Po:<br />

Phulbani, Dist: Kandhamal, Odisha, Pin: 762001.<br />

2 Department <strong>of</strong> Agronomy, College <strong>of</strong> Agriculture, OUAT, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, Pin - 756001<br />

* subrat_behera@rediffmail.com<br />

Crop production in the rainfed lands in India is presently plagued with numerous problems<br />

like insufficient and erratic rainfall, land degradation and low soil fertility, poor supply <strong>of</strong><br />

agri-inputs, weak technology dissemination system, low investment capacity <strong>of</strong> farmers, etc.<br />

Uneven and erratic rainfall in the rainfed area also creates moisture stress conditions during<br />

critical growth stages <strong>of</strong> crop life, resulting in severe yield reduction. Even when the rainfall<br />

is high, it is <strong>of</strong>ten lost as run<strong>of</strong>f, when the surface <strong>of</strong> the soil is not suitably formed.<br />

Therefore, it is <strong>of</strong> utmost importance to enhance the resilience <strong>of</strong> rainfed agriculture to<br />

climate change through the introduction <strong>of</strong> improved varieties, planned adoption <strong>of</strong><br />

appropriate inter-cropping systems, and also with other management practices <strong>of</strong> natural<br />

resources. Keeping this in view, the present study was conducted to evaluate the response <strong>of</strong><br />

improved varieties and promising intercropping systems as well as different management<br />

practices such as in-situ moisture conservation, nutrient management, pest and disease<br />

management and weed management for different crops and cropping systems to climate<br />

vulnerability such as drought in rainfed agro-ecosystems <strong>of</strong> Odisha.<br />

Methodology<br />

The on-farm research was conducted at the villages such as Budhadani and Gunjidraga <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Kandhamal District <strong>of</strong> Odisha under the NICRA program <strong>of</strong> AICRP for Dryland Agriculture,<br />

Phulbani, Odisha during Kharif season <strong>of</strong> 2019-21. These two villages <strong>of</strong>ten experience<br />

scarce and erratic monsoon rainfall during Kharif season. The villages received rainfall <strong>of</strong><br />

1646.0 mm, 1957.0 mm and 1283.6 mm during Kharif season <strong>of</strong> 2019, 2020 and 2021 in 69,<br />

84 and 64 rainy days, respectively as against normal rainfall <strong>of</strong> 1407 mm with 65 rainy days.<br />

The total number <strong>of</strong> dry spells occurred during Kharif 2019, 2020 and 2021 were 2, 1 and 4<br />

respectively. The demonstrations were conducted on improved crop varieties such as Rice<br />

(var. Sahabhagi, Lalat), Maize (var. P-3501, NMH-51, OMH 14-27), Pigeon pea (var. NTL<br />

724), Cowpea (var. Gomti), Radish (var. Pusa Chetki), Tomato (var. Priya), Brinjal (var. Blue<br />

star), Bean (var. Raikia Local), Okra (var. JKOH 7315) and Watermelon (var. Black pearl).<br />

The demonstrations were also conducted on different intercropping systems such as maize +<br />

cowpea, maize + pigeonpea and pigeonpea + radish. The different management practices<br />

Ecosystem based approaches for climate change adaptation, ecosystem services, integrated farming system<br />

models, Land degradation neutrality<br />

143 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

such as in-situ moisture conservation, nutrient management, pest and disease management<br />

and weed management were also taken care <strong>of</strong> for these crops and cropping systems.<br />

Results<br />

In situ moisture conservation practices <strong>of</strong> summer ploughing and raising the bund height in<br />

rice, maize crops recorded a yield advantage <strong>of</strong> 20% higher over farmers’ practice. The<br />

improved varieties <strong>of</strong> rice i.e. Sahabhagi, Lalat and Naveen in Budhadani and Gunjidrga<br />

villages recorded significantly higher grain yield <strong>of</strong> 2510, 2520 and 2420 kg/ha, respectively<br />

compared to the traditional varieties (1850 kg/ha). Increases in yield <strong>of</strong> different rice variety<br />

were found to be 35.67%, 36.21% and 30.81% than the local variety (Saria, Jhalka, Punia),<br />

respectively. Hybrid maize such as P-3501 and NMH-51 produced 80.2 % and 76.5% higher<br />

yield respectively as compared to local variety (KujiMakka). Variety P – 3501 was largely<br />

preferred by the farmers because <strong>of</strong> its yield advantage, grain quality and large cob size that<br />

fetches more monetary return and market price. Introduction <strong>of</strong> maize + cowpea (2:2) and<br />

maize + pigeonpea (2:2) intercropping systems resulted in higher maize equivalent yield with<br />

yield advantages <strong>of</strong> 80.3% and 50.5% respectively as compared to sole maize crops. The<br />

introduction <strong>of</strong> pigeonpea + radish (2:2) intercropping system resulted in a higher pigeonpea<br />

equivalent yield with yield advantages <strong>of</strong> 84.6% as compared to sole pigeonpea crops.<br />

Intervention in integrated nutrient management (INM) such as the application <strong>of</strong> organic and<br />

inorganic fertilizer along with micronutrients was applied in the demonstration <strong>of</strong> sole maize<br />

and maize + cowpea (2:2) intercropping system. In weed management, pre-emergent<br />

application <strong>of</strong> Pendimethalin @ 5 ml/l <strong>of</strong> water at 2-3 DAS along with one-hand weeding was<br />

done during the crop growing period. These interventions <strong>of</strong> INM, weed, pest, and disease<br />

management increase the yield by 15.4% than the farmers’ practices. Improved varieties <strong>of</strong><br />

vegetable crops such as Tomato (var. Hybrid Priya), Brinjal (var. Blue star), Bean (var.<br />

Raikia bean), Okra (var. JKOH 7315),and Watermelon (var. Black pearl) resulted in higher<br />

yields than the farmer’s practice and net return <strong>of</strong> Rs. 1.0 to 1.2 Lakhs per hectare.<br />

Conclusions<br />

This study clearly indicated the advantage <strong>of</strong> adopting all improved rainfed agro technologies<br />

for different crops and systems in comparison to traditional practices. Assessment <strong>of</strong><br />

improved varieties <strong>of</strong> rice to climate vulnerability like the drought situation in Odisha<br />

indicated that the rice variety “Sahabhagi” is drought tolerant whereas varieties like Naveen<br />

and Lalat are also promising in the rainfed situation. Improved maize varieties such as NTL-<br />

30 and P-3501 are also promising varieties in the rainfed situation <strong>of</strong> Odisha. The In situ<br />

moisture conservation practices such as <strong>of</strong> both summer ploughing and increasing the bund<br />

height as well as INM, weed, pest, and disease management also proved superior in<br />

improving both soil and crop productivity and sustainability <strong>of</strong> dryland farmers.<br />

144 | Page<br />

Ecosystem based approaches for climate change adaptation, ecosystem services, integrated farming system models,<br />

Land degradation neutrality


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

T2-02O-1163<br />

Mainstreaming Agrobiodiversity – an Integrated Approach to Improve<br />

Nutrition, Livelihoods, Ecosystem Services and Reduce Climate<br />

Vulnerability<br />

Jai C Rana<br />

Rana, Alliance <strong>of</strong> Bioversity International and CIAT – India Office<br />

NASC Complex, Pusa, New Delhi – 110012<br />

In today’s complex and interconnected world, what we eat and how we produce it are<br />

inextricably bound together. With the global population expected to touch 9.7 billion by<br />

2050, there will be increasing pressure on our limited natural resources to produce more food,<br />

almost 50% more food, feed and bio-fuel than it did in 2012. Recent FAO report warns that<br />

the projected growth in world population is likely to be concentrated in sub-Saharan Africa<br />

and South Asia, with major concentration in India. This will pose immense problems, as<br />

expanding agriculture in India will be difficult because <strong>of</strong> scarcity <strong>of</strong> land and water<br />

resources. At present, there are worrying signs that yield growth is levelling <strong>of</strong>f for major<br />

crops. Hence, high-input, resource-intensive farming systems, which have caused massive<br />

deforestation, water scarcities, soil depletion and high levels <strong>of</strong> greenhouse gas emissions,<br />

cannot deliver sustainable food and agricultural production.<br />

The Sustainable Development Goals recognize that these challenges are interconnected and<br />

multidimensional. Under these challenges, achieving food security in drylands is more<br />

challenging. Drylands cover 41% <strong>of</strong> the earth’s land area and are home to 38% <strong>of</strong> the world’s<br />

population, the majority <strong>of</strong> whom live in poverty. With changing climates threatening fragile<br />

ecosystems and high migration levels, the livelihoods <strong>of</strong> more than 2 billion people are at<br />

risk. Farm households and rural communities around the world, including in dryland systems,<br />

have long since used agricultural and tree biodiversity to diversify their diets and their<br />

production systems, to manage pests, diseases and weather-related stress. The evidence<br />

shows that biodiversity-based approaches intensify production while reducing pressures on<br />

the environment, for example, by improving soil quality. At the same time, a diversified diet<br />

is essential for human health.<br />

Healthy dryland ecosystems and agrobiodiversity are essential for dryland communities to<br />

overcome their poverty. A major challenge is how to facilitate agricultural growth without<br />

endangering the resource base. About 800 million farmers in drylands depend on limited<br />

crops diversity <strong>of</strong> cereals, millets, legumes, and oilseeds. When food supplies are scarce,<br />

traditional plant varieties are <strong>of</strong>ten lifesavers as they are well adapted to drought, variable<br />

rainfall and harsh environments. The adaptive traits <strong>of</strong> dryland organisms are <strong>of</strong> growing<br />

importance for coping with the impacts <strong>of</strong> climate change and using traditional varieties in<br />

Ecosystem based approaches for climate change adaptation, ecosystem services, integrated farming system<br />

models, Land degradation neutrality<br />

145 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

production systems can increase the capacity <strong>of</strong> the system to adapt to unexpected or<br />

changing climate events, as they harbour higher levels <strong>of</strong> genetic diversity, and so are more<br />

able to respond to variation in their environment.<br />

Mainstreaming agrobiodiversity initiative led by Bioversity International and partners, is<br />

linking farmers to the seeds they need to face changing climatic conditions. This tricot-based<br />

crowd sourcing approach puts farmers in the role <strong>of</strong> citizen scientists, testing, observing and<br />

comparing different varieties, trying new farming techniques, and experimenting with<br />

different crop rotations to see what works for them. They evaluate different qualities <strong>of</strong> each<br />

variety such as yield, resilience, nutrition, taste and resistance to pests and diseases. The idea<br />

is to stimulate farmers to experiment with different landraces and varieties, while linking to<br />

geographical tools to make these efforts more targeted and more efficient. The approach also<br />

focus on strengthening local seed supply systems and the establishment <strong>of</strong> community<br />

genebanks, seed fairs, field evaluation trials (mother and baby trials that allow need based<br />

participatory selection), diversity fora and other adaptive technologies that enable farmers to<br />

benefit from diversity rich solutions. This also includes identification <strong>of</strong> suitable crop<br />

diversity to address such challenges, greater awareness and information on varietal adaptation<br />

based on scientifically sound evidence and its validation by farmers and communities. We<br />

have also develop successful value chains that improve farmers income and livelihoods<br />

through mainstreaming actions.<br />

T2-03O<br />

Ecosystem based Cropping System for Climate Change Adaptation – An<br />

Experience from Odisha Millets Mission<br />

Susanta Sekhar Chaudhury*, Biswa Sankar Das, Pulak Ranjan Nayak, Abhishek<br />

Pradhan, Bikash Das<br />

Programme manager (Research) Watershed Support Services Activities Network (WASSAN),<br />

Bhubaneswar, Odisha<br />

* sushantasekhar@rediffmail.com, susant@wassan.org<br />

Ecosystem-based approaches are becoming increasingly important as they can provide<br />

multiple benefits and are <strong>of</strong>ten considered cost-effective solutions as compared to<br />

technological approaches to tackling climate change. The underutilized cultivated species like<br />

millets, whose survival is dependent not only upon their resilience and adaptation but also on<br />

our own ability to recognize and promote sustainably their use in a context <strong>of</strong> changing<br />

markets, food trends and life styles. Out <strong>of</strong> an estimated portfolio <strong>of</strong> 30,000 edible plant<br />

species recorded worldwide, humankind depends upon just 12 crops for the bulk <strong>of</strong> its<br />

nutritional requirements. On the other hand, underutilized species (wild or cultivated), may<br />

hold as well as the key to future agro-ecosystem diversification and climate change<br />

146 | Page<br />

Ecosystem based approaches for climate change adaptation, ecosystem services, integrated farming system models,<br />

Land degradation neutrality


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

adaptation. Odisha Millets Mission (OMM) is a flagship programme implemented by<br />

Watershed Support Services and Activities Network (WASSAN) with the support <strong>of</strong> Director<br />

Agriculture & Food Production (DAFP), Government <strong>of</strong> Odisha and Nabakrushna<br />

Choudhury Centre for Development Studies (NCDS), Bhubaneswar to an aim reviving millet<br />

in farm and on plates.<br />

OMM work with large number <strong>of</strong> farming communities to increase millets productivity by<br />

optimal utilization <strong>of</strong> available bio-resources with farmers’ friendly technologies. It has not<br />

only looking after only increasing productivity <strong>of</strong> the millets but also focusing on in-situ, exsitu<br />

and community conservation and modifying traditional cropping system with improved<br />

package <strong>of</strong> practices. It has set up an Agro-ecological center where different crops and<br />

varieties are conserve, characterize and evaluate both by farming communities and<br />

researchers through different methods. Collaboration with State Seed Testing Laboratories<br />

(SSTL) to restore the valuable germplasm in a cryogenic system. It has also taken Crop<br />

Diversity Blocks (CDB) in each block for community conservation and evaluation to<br />

strengthen the community seed bank which serve any seed loss or scarcity due to natural<br />

calamities. Participatory approach followed to document indigenous knowledge and mapping<br />

<strong>of</strong> landraces <strong>of</strong> different crops which help to prepare strategies for climate mitigation in<br />

future. The paper will explain different agricultural approaches like Participatory Varietal<br />

Trial, Community Managed Seed System, Poly-culture, Crop Diversity Block etc, taken in an<br />

ecosystem for climatic change adaptation.<br />

T2-04O<br />

Integrated Farming System Approach for Sustainable Development <strong>of</strong><br />

Small and Marginal Farmers <strong>of</strong> India<br />

Ayesha Fatima 1 , Rajiv K. Singh 2 , P.K. Upadhyay 2 , S.S. Rathore 2 and Kapila<br />

Shekhawat 2<br />

1 Dr. Kalam Agricultural College, Kishanganj 855 107, Bihar<br />

2 Division <strong>of</strong> Agronomy, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi<br />

The world’s population is estimated to be 9.73 billion by 2050 as projected by the United<br />

Nations and to meet the demands <strong>of</strong> this burgeoning population, agriculture will need to<br />

produce almost 50 percent more food, feed and bi<strong>of</strong>uel than it did in 2012 (FAO, 2017).<br />

India, having population growth <strong>of</strong> 1%, the situation seems very alarming, particularly when<br />

the environment and soil health are deteriorating. Under this condition, there is a significant<br />

concern that how can we feed an expanding population without having harmful<br />

environmental and social repercussions? The potential answer to this question can be the<br />

adoption <strong>of</strong> location-specific, tailor-made integrated farming system (IFS) models depending<br />

on the existing resource base <strong>of</strong> the farmers. IFS represents integration <strong>of</strong> farm<br />

Ecosystem based approaches for climate change adaptation, ecosystem services, integrated farming system<br />

models, Land degradation neutrality<br />

147 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

enterprises/components such as cropping systems, animal husbandry, fisheries, forestry,<br />

duckery, poultry, sericulture etc. for optimal utilization <strong>of</strong> resources thereby it has the<br />

potential to significantly improve the economic status and livelihood <strong>of</strong> small and marginal<br />

farmers <strong>of</strong> India. In a nutshell, many <strong>of</strong> the emerging issues in modern agriculture, such as<br />

declining factor productivity, lowering production and pr<strong>of</strong>itability, increasing costs <strong>of</strong><br />

farming, inefficient resource use, hidden unemployment, and degradation <strong>of</strong> the natural<br />

resource base, are successfully addressed by the IFS's core characteristics.<br />

IFS for Environmental Sustainability: The deterioration <strong>of</strong> natural resources, buildup <strong>of</strong><br />

diseases and pests, and decline in factor productivity are just a few <strong>of</strong> the negative<br />

consequences <strong>of</strong> monoculture and continuous cropping, such as rice-wheat and rice-rice<br />

systems. All <strong>of</strong> this has endangered the sustainability <strong>of</strong> some <strong>of</strong> India's most productive<br />

regions. Environmental deterioration brought about by excessive use <strong>of</strong> high-energy inputs,<br />

such as fertilizers and pesticides, has been documented in many economically developed<br />

countries under the stress <strong>of</strong> intensive agriculture. Utilizing and recycling locally available<br />

inputs while integrating them with the minimum amounts <strong>of</strong> external inputs will improve the<br />

farm sustainability. In addition to being environmentally sustainable, using locally available<br />

inputs can help keep production costs within the reach <strong>of</strong> farmers. The role <strong>of</strong> indigenous<br />

technological wisdom in this process is significant. IFS is advantageous because <strong>of</strong> greater<br />

sustainability, diversification, intensification, productivity gains, and improvements to the<br />

utilization <strong>of</strong> natural resources.<br />

IFS for Improved Soil Health: Compared to cropping systems, integrated farming systems<br />

have several advantages. Applying livestock manure increases the amount <strong>of</strong> organic matter<br />

in the soil, which improves water infiltration, water holding capacity, and cation exchange<br />

capacity, all <strong>of</strong> which are mostly related to biological aeration. Manure and urine increase pH<br />

levels, which accelerate microbial activity and the decomposition <strong>of</strong> organic matter. With soil<br />

recuperation on a physical, chemical, and biological level, it helps to enhance and preserve<br />

the productive capacities <strong>of</strong> soils. Studies conducted under various IFS models across India<br />

have emphasized that recycling <strong>of</strong> livestock by-products such as FYM, poultry manure, etc.<br />

within the farm itself have led to improved soil physio-chemical properties. Solaiappan et al.<br />

(2007) reported that integration <strong>of</strong> poultry (20) + goat (4) + sheep (6) + dairy (1) along with<br />

conventional cropping system led to maximum organic carbon (0.35%), available soil N (134<br />

kgha -1 ), soil P (8.5 kgha -1 ) and soil K (378 kgha -1 ) at the end <strong>of</strong> experimental trial. Integration<br />

<strong>of</strong> rice-fish-duck system under coastal ecosystem has reported improved soil health due to<br />

effective nutrient recycling among different components.<br />

IFS for Risk Management in Agriculture: A single commodity-based agriculture is more<br />

vulnerable to climatic, biotic (pests and diseases) and economic (relative prices <strong>of</strong> input and<br />

output) changes compared to IFS. Adoption <strong>of</strong> IFS would help farmers escape such situations<br />

148 | Page<br />

Ecosystem based approaches for climate change adaptation, ecosystem services, integrated farming system models,<br />

Land degradation neutrality


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

and reduce the risk involved in the crop failure and it has been reported that IFS are <strong>of</strong>ten less<br />

risky than single enterprises-based production system. IFS enables farmers to strategically<br />

modify the allocation <strong>of</strong> inputs (land, water, and pasture) among and between enterprises in<br />

response to fluctuations in market and the climate. Under delayed monsoon onset conditions,<br />

anIFS comprising agri-horticulture, agri-pasture, silvi-pasture can provide sufficient fodder<br />

for 8 adult cattle along with milk and FYM.<br />

IFS for Higher System Productivity and Pr<strong>of</strong>itability: Analysis <strong>of</strong> IFS model at ICAR-IARI,<br />

New Delhi have revealed that simple integration <strong>of</strong> crop + dairy has the potential to enhance total<br />

system productivity as compared sole cropping. The increased productivity in the diversified IFS<br />

model may be ascribed to synergisms among the enterprises and the wastes or by-products from<br />

one enterprise used as inputs in other enterprise. In addition, simultaneous application <strong>of</strong> recycled<br />

pond silt, poultry manure, biogas slurry, nutrient rich pond water for irrigation and cow dung as<br />

FYM and vermicompost, nutrient enrichment through decomposition <strong>of</strong> stubbles and crop<br />

residues under different IFS enterprises provided congenial situation to increase the yield. When<br />

a fisheries unit was combined with a duckery unit, the fish production improved as well, owing to<br />

the fact that duck droppings served as a source <strong>of</strong> food for the fish. Crops applied with enriched<br />

pond silts having higher nutrients and integration <strong>of</strong> high value components like<br />

fish/poultry/duck/goat/cattle might contribute for better crop productivity. He also reported that<br />

the rice-wheat system had productivity <strong>of</strong> 7.25 tha -1 , cropping alone registered 9.21 tha -1 whereas<br />

higher productivity <strong>of</strong> 19.2 tha -1 was recorded in cropping + fish + poultry; 21.18 tha -1 in crop +<br />

fish + cattle and 21.20 tha -1 in crop + fish + duck + goat in Lower Gangetic Plains <strong>of</strong> Bihar.<br />

System productivity and net returns under different IFS models, mean <strong>of</strong> two years<br />

(2019-20 and 2020-21)<br />

IFS Model<br />

System productivity<br />

(t ha -1 )<br />

Net returns<br />

(× 10 3 ₹ ha -1 )<br />

Rice-wheat system 10.9 111<br />

Crop enterprise 24.4 129<br />

Crop + dairy 46.5 316<br />

Crop + dairy + fishery 51.4 344<br />

Crop + dairy + fishery + poultry 54.1 371<br />

Crop + dairy + fishery + poultry + duckery 56.8 392<br />

Crop + dairy + fishery + poultry + duckery + apiary 58.3 391<br />

Crop + dairy + fishery + poultry + duckery + apiary +<br />

boundary plantation<br />

Crop + dairy + fishery + poultry + duckery + apiary +<br />

boundary plantation + biogas unit<br />

Crop + dairy + fishery + poultry + duckery + apiary +<br />

boundary plantation + biogas unit + vermi-compost<br />

59.5 395<br />

59.9 399<br />

61.5 398<br />

Ecosystem based approaches for climate change adaptation, ecosystem services, integrated farming system<br />

models, Land degradation neutrality<br />

149 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

The enterprises such as dairy, fisheries, poultry, duckery, etc. were very remunerative on<br />

account <strong>of</strong> round the year availability <strong>of</strong> economic products having higher market demand<br />

and better market price <strong>of</strong> these commodities. Inclusion <strong>of</strong> more number <strong>of</strong> self-sustaining<br />

enterprises can become a key for improving the farm pr<strong>of</strong>itability <strong>of</strong> small and marginal<br />

holders. Thus, adoption <strong>of</strong> IFS can enhance net returns by 4.3 to 4.8 times than sole cropping.<br />

Apart from providing higher productivity and pr<strong>of</strong>itability, the diversified IFS model can<br />

provide round the year employment to the farm family along with food and nutritional<br />

security owing to the diverse group <strong>of</strong> outputs obtained from the system. The biogas unit<br />

integrated in the model meets the energy requirement for lighting and cooking purposes for<br />

the farm family. This model also provides beneficial ecosystem services with the integration<br />

<strong>of</strong> apiary and boundary plantation enterprises. The Apis mellifera aids in pollination <strong>of</strong><br />

different food and ornamental crops as well as trees apart from providing high value honey<br />

and complementary products such as beeswax, royal jelly, etc. The trees included in the<br />

boundary plantation prevent soil erosion and improves the landscape <strong>of</strong> the area. The<br />

ecologically oriented IFS model can stabilize the agriculture landscape and also enrich the<br />

biodiversity <strong>of</strong> the given area. IFS promotes a rich culture <strong>of</strong> biodiversity through<br />

maintaining a multi-enterprise system <strong>of</strong> flora and fauna.<br />

Conclusion<br />

Livelihood, food and nutritional security have been major concern <strong>of</strong> small and marginal<br />

farmers <strong>of</strong> India, which represent 86% <strong>of</strong> the farm families. Integrated farming system<br />

approach can serve to fulfill these concerns since it provides employment opportunities to the<br />

farm family round the year along with production <strong>of</strong> nutritious wholesome food. The<br />

integration <strong>of</strong> the enterprises should be done in a complementary way so that the by-products<br />

<strong>of</strong> one enterprise can be used effectively in another thereby enhancing the resource use<br />

efficiency and reducing dependence on purchased <strong>of</strong>f-farm inputs. The benefits <strong>of</strong> IFS are<br />

multifold ranging from sustainability, environmental safety, conservation <strong>of</strong> resource base to<br />

socio-economic prosperity <strong>of</strong> the small farm holders. There is a dire need to develop locationspecific<br />

farming system models keeping in view the available resources and managerial<br />

ability <strong>of</strong> the farmers.<br />

References<br />

FAO. 2017. The future <strong>of</strong> food and agriculture – Trends and challenges. Rome. ISBN 978-<br />

92-5- 109551-5.<br />

Solaiappan, U., Subramanian, V. and Maruthi, Sankar, G.R. 2007. Selection <strong>of</strong> suitable<br />

integrated farming system model for rainfed semi–arid vertic Inseptisols in Tamil<br />

Nadu. Indian J. Agron.,52(3): 194–7.<br />

150 | Page<br />

Ecosystem based approaches for climate change adaptation, ecosystem services, integrated farming system models,<br />

Land degradation neutrality


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

T2-05R-1052<br />

Enhancing System Productivity <strong>of</strong> Farmers through Rainfed Integrated<br />

Farming Systems in Shivalik Foot hills <strong>of</strong> Punjab<br />

Balwinder Singh Dhillon*, M. J. Singh, Anil Khokhar, Abrar Yousuf, Mohammad<br />

Amin Bhatand Parminder Singh Sandhu<br />

Punjab Agricultural University-Regional Research Station, AICRPDA Centre BallowalSaunkhri,<br />

Balachaur, Punjab 144521- India<br />

* dhillonbalwinder@pau.edu<br />

In Punjab, rainfed area lies in North-Eastern part in the form <strong>of</strong> 10 to 20 km wide strip known<br />

as 'Kandi' area. The area <strong>of</strong> region is approximately 3.93 lakh ha which comprises 7.8% <strong>of</strong><br />

total geographical area <strong>of</strong> the state. The crop production in rainfed area is mostly dependent<br />

on rainfall received during the monsoon season. The productivity <strong>of</strong> rainfed crops remains<br />

low which is attributed to erratic distribution <strong>of</strong> rainfall, intermittent dry spells during the<br />

crop season, delayed onset and early withdrawal <strong>of</strong> monsoon. Maize–wheat is the<br />

predominant cropping system in this region. Integrated farming system (IFS) approach has<br />

been widely advocated for improving productivity, pr<strong>of</strong>itability, livelihood and soil health<br />

under different agro-ecological settings <strong>of</strong> India (Sahoo et al. 2015; Balamati and Shamaraj<br />

2017).<br />

Improving the productivity <strong>of</strong> annual crops shall remain the focal point for improving the<br />

productivity <strong>of</strong> any farming system. The key elements for improvement <strong>of</strong> crop productivity<br />

envisaged for this region are: efficient rain water management, suitable tillage and sowing<br />

operations, selection <strong>of</strong> improved varieties, appropriate intercropping and crop rotation<br />

systems, efficient soil fertility management, proper plant protection measures and<br />

contingency crop planning. However, positive impact <strong>of</strong> these interventions on yield are more<br />

perceptible only in normal to mild drought years, causing reluctance <strong>of</strong> farmers to adopt these<br />

improved dryland farming technologies (Jodha et al 2012). But they are constrained mainly<br />

due to poor access to technical knowledge and critical inputs, long gestation period and high<br />

transaction cost <strong>of</strong> small marketable surplus. Due to small and scattered land holdings, the<br />

farmers in Shivalik foothills <strong>of</strong> Punjab have poor economic status. Integration <strong>of</strong> crops,<br />

animals and related subsidiary enterprises may enhance the net-income <strong>of</strong> the farm as a<br />

whole. Therefore, various rainfed integrated farming systems (RIFS)/models were established<br />

at farmers’ field under rainfedand partially irrigated conditions to compare the system<br />

productivity and economics <strong>of</strong> IFS models with maize-wheat cropping systems.<br />

Ecosystem based approaches for climate change adaptation, ecosystem services, integrated farming system<br />

models, Land degradation neutrality<br />

151 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Methodology<br />

Various rainfed integrated farming systems (RIFS)/models were established at farmers’ field<br />

in which integration <strong>of</strong> different components like pulses, oilseed, vegetables and fodder<br />

crops, fruits, animal, mushroom, vermicompost and sugarcane processing were taken into<br />

account. Total 24 farmers were taken, in both marginal and small category (3 in each<br />

category) under rainfed and partially irrigated conditions (12 in both farming<br />

situations).Various interventions like improved varieties <strong>of</strong> maize and wheat, introduced<br />

pulses (chickpea, lentil, moong, mash, soybean and arhar) and oilseeds (mustard-rapeseed,<br />

groundnut and sesame)crops, vermibags for vermicomposting, mushroom bags for mushroom<br />

production, seed <strong>of</strong> fodder crops, mineral mixture and uromin lick for strengthen the animal<br />

component, vegetable kits for kitchen gardening and training on sugarcane processing were<br />

given to the farmers and RIFS models were established under the flagship programme <strong>of</strong> onfarm<br />

rainfed integrated farming system research.<br />

Results<br />

System productivity <strong>of</strong> the marginal category farmers under Rainfed Integrated Farming<br />

System (RIFS) model was 9,664 kg per farming system (mean <strong>of</strong> 3 farmers), which was<br />

higher than traditional maize-wheat cropping system (4,671kg per farming system) in rainfed<br />

situations and RIFS model produced higher system productivity (10,985 kg per farming<br />

system) than maize-wheat cropping system (6,422kg per farming system) under partial<br />

irrigated conditions. Further, RIFS model for marginal category farmers resulted in additional<br />

net returns (Rs.99,922/-per farming system in rainfed conditions and Rs. 91,726/- per farming<br />

system in partial irrigated conditions) and additional employment generation (43 in rainfed<br />

situations and 47 man-days per year per farming system in partial irrigated conditions).<br />

Similarly, RIFS model for the small category farmers resulted in 21,996 kg per farming<br />

system in rainfed conditions and 18,446 kg per farming system in partial irrigated conditions,<br />

system productivity which was higher over maize-wheat (13,291 kg per farming system in<br />

rainfed situation and 12,678 kg per farming system in partial irrigated conditions. RIFS<br />

models for small category farmers recorded additional net returns (Rs. 1,74,998/- per farming<br />

system in rainfed conditions and Rs. 1,15,749/- per farming system in partial irrigated<br />

conditions) and additional employment generation (51 in rainfed situations and 94 man-days<br />

per year per farming system in partial irrigated conditions) than maize-wheat cropping<br />

system.<br />

Conclusion<br />

The study reveals that integration <strong>of</strong> dairy, mushroom, vermicomposting and sugarcane<br />

processing components with diversified crops through pulses, oilseeds and vegetables in<br />

152 | Page<br />

Ecosystem based approaches for climate change adaptation, ecosystem services, integrated farming system models,<br />

Land degradation neutrality


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

kandi region <strong>of</strong> Punjab is essential to <strong>of</strong>fset the ecological imbalances arising due to<br />

continuous cultivation <strong>of</strong> maize-wheat cropping system with local varieties.<br />

References<br />

Balamatti, A. and Shamaraj, H. 2017. Participatory evaluation <strong>of</strong> choice and combination <strong>of</strong><br />

enterprises for integrated farming system under dry-land and irrigated agro-ecosystems.<br />

Indian Journal <strong>of</strong> Agronomy 62(1): 8–15.<br />

Sahoo, H.K., Behera, B., Behera, U.K. and Das, T.K. 2015. Land productivity enhancement<br />

and soil health improvement in rainfed rice (Oryza sativa) farms <strong>of</strong> Odisha through<br />

integrated farming system. Indian Journal <strong>of</strong> Agronomy 60(4): 485–492.<br />

Jodha, N.S., Singh, N.P. and Bantilan, C.M.S. 2012. Enhancing farmers’ adaptation to<br />

climate change in arid and semiarid agriculture <strong>of</strong> India: Evidence from indigenous<br />

practices. Working Paper Series No. 32, ICRISAT, Patancheru, India,<br />

System productivity, net returns and employment generation <strong>of</strong> different categories<br />

Treatments<br />

Farming situation: Rainfed<br />

farmers under RIFS model in (Pooled data <strong>of</strong> 2 years)<br />

Category<br />

System<br />

productivity<br />

(kg/FS)<br />

Net returns<br />

(Rs/FS)<br />

Employment<br />

generation (mandays/season/FS)<br />

Integrated farming system Marginal 9,664 1,95,104 81<br />

Maize-wheat cropping system Marginal 4,671 95,182 38<br />

Integrated farming system Small 21,996 4,43,417 107<br />

Maize-wheat cropping system Small 13,291 2,68,419 56<br />

Farming situation: Partially irrigated<br />

Integrated farming system Marginal 10,985 2,22,543 87<br />

Maize-wheat cropping system Marginal 6,422 1,30,817 40<br />

Integrated farming system Small 18,446 3,72,405 147<br />

Maize-wheat cropping system Small 12,678 2,56,656 53<br />

FS; Farming system<br />

Ecosystem based approaches for climate change adaptation, ecosystem services, integrated farming system<br />

models, Land degradation neutrality<br />

153 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

T2-06R-1116<br />

Livelihood Sustainability <strong>of</strong> Rainfed Farmers: Impact <strong>of</strong> Various Fodder<br />

based Cropping Systems in Rainfed Regions <strong>of</strong> Telangana<br />

V. Visha Kumari, S.S. Balloli, K. Srinivas, D.B.V. Ramana V. Manoranjan Kumar, V.<br />

Maruthi, M. Prabhakar, M. Osman, A.K. Indoria. M. Manjunath, G. Ravindra Chary,<br />

Purabi Banerjee, S.K. Yadav and V. K. Singh<br />

ICAR-Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, Santoshnagar (P.O.), Hyderabad 500059<br />

In drylands, we have a restriction with very narrow sowing window apart from land<br />

degradation and poor productivity. Thus, to reduce the risk <strong>of</strong> crop failure and to have a<br />

sustainable farming, the farmers <strong>of</strong>ten prefer intercropping rather than single crop. However,<br />

at least for six months in a year there is no vegetal cover on cultivated soil. Even though dairy<br />

is an important component in dryland, availability <strong>of</strong> fodder from natural grasses or fodder<br />

crops are negligible. Growing perennial forage legume or grass viz., Desmanthus and Guinea<br />

grass with proved and existing promising cropping system <strong>of</strong> dryland is recommended. They<br />

grow fast and cover the land surface quickly even under low rainfall situations and provide<br />

considerable amount <strong>of</strong> green fodder. They can help in increasing the crop yield and resource<br />

use efficiency through their vegetation cover. The perennial system can also help in soil<br />

conservation and reducing water and soil run<strong>of</strong>f. It is possible to enhance the productivity <strong>of</strong><br />

the livestock by integrating fodder production into the farmers’ cropping systems. Thus, a<br />

project was initiated to explore options for integrating quality fodder production into exiting<br />

cropping systems <strong>of</strong> rainfed areas.<br />

Methodology<br />

The field experiment was conducted during 2015–2021 at Gungal Research Farm <strong>of</strong> ICAR-<br />

CRIDA (17°40' 40.4" N latitude and 78°39', 55.7” E longitude and at a mean sea level <strong>of</strong> 626<br />

m), Hyderabad, Telangana, India with seven cropping systems involving conventional crops<br />

either alone (100% area) or in combination with annual or perennial fodder species (50% area<br />

for crops, 50% for fodder species). The 7 treatments are: Sorghum + pigeonpea: desmanthus,<br />

sorghum + pigeonpea: guinea grass, castor: desmanthus, castor: guinea grass, sorghum:<br />

Fodder-clusterbean- Fodder-cowpea- Fodder-horsegram, Sole Sorghum and Sole pigeonpea.<br />

The standard crop management practices like uniform application <strong>of</strong> fertilizers, pest and<br />

disease management were followed.<br />

Results<br />

Results <strong>of</strong> seven-year long experiment revealed that sorghum + pigeonpea/guinea grass can<br />

produce on average 1350 kg <strong>of</strong> sorghum, 790 kg <strong>of</strong> pigeon pea from half hectare <strong>of</strong> land.<br />

Also, another half hectare can give 26500 kg <strong>of</strong> fresh fodder in 4-5 cuts. On the other hand,<br />

154 | Page<br />

Ecosystem based approaches for climate change adaptation, ecosystem services, integrated farming system models,<br />

Land degradation neutrality


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

sorghum+ pigeon pea-desmanthus can produce 16000 kg <strong>of</strong> fresh fodder apart from grain<br />

yield (Fig). A farmer with no animals would have more advantage with sorghum +<br />

pigeonpea/guinea grass as the system will yield more net returns. However, farmers with<br />

small ruminants could prefer sorghum+ pigeon pea-desmanthus, it was found to be the best<br />

fodder-based cropping system as it meets the dry matter, energy and protein requirement <strong>of</strong><br />

more growing lambs for longer period <strong>of</strong> rearing. These two systems are also better in<br />

providing green fodder for at least 8-9 months without any supplemental irrigation. Along<br />

with that, we observed less soil loss, water loss (40-48% less), sediment loss (50-58% less)<br />

and less pest and disease incidence in these systems due to diverse crops and higher number<br />

<strong>of</strong> natural predators.<br />

Conclusion<br />

Perennial fodder based cropping system can improve the livelihood <strong>of</strong> rainfed farmers by<br />

increasing the income from crop, livestock and fodder. These systems also improve the soil<br />

health and reduce the soil and water losses. Diversity <strong>of</strong> crops reduces the pest and disease<br />

incidence and thus helps in improving yield.<br />

kg/ha<br />

60000<br />

40000<br />

20000<br />

0<br />

6000<br />

4000<br />

2000<br />

0<br />

kg/ha<br />

Grain SEY<br />

FSEY<br />

Sorghum grain (SEY) and Fodder Sorghum (FSEY) Equivalent yield (Averaged over years)<br />

Ecosystem based approaches for climate change adaptation, ecosystem services, integrated farming system<br />

models, Land degradation neutrality<br />

155 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

T2-07R-1128<br />

Quantification <strong>of</strong> Ecosystem Services from Multifunctional Agr<strong>of</strong>orestry<br />

Established for Family Farming in Tamil Nadu<br />

A. Keerthika 1 , K.T. Parthiban 2 , A.K. Shukla 1 , R.S. Mehta 1 , M.B. Noor Mohamed 1 and<br />

Kamla K Choudhary 1<br />

1 ICAR-Central Arid Zone Research Institute, Regional Research Station, Pali Marwar, Rajasthan<br />

(RJ), India - 306 401<br />

2 Forest College and Research Institute, TNAU, Mettupalayam, India - 641 301<br />

lathikaconifers@gmail.com<br />

Agr<strong>of</strong>orestry has witnessed challenges and changes every decade in the form <strong>of</strong> technology<br />

and marketing interventions. Although agr<strong>of</strong>orestry is promoted for meeting food and<br />

nutritional security, it became the need <strong>of</strong> the hour to promote multifunctional agr<strong>of</strong>orestry<br />

with the main focus on small-scale farmers to provide income throughout the year. Moreover,<br />

this multifunctional agr<strong>of</strong>orestry has gained attraction recently because <strong>of</strong> nutritional and<br />

food security issues as committed in sustainable development goals (SDG).<br />

Methodology<br />

The experiment was carried out during 2018-2021 and is located at sylvan surroundings <strong>of</strong><br />

the foothills <strong>of</strong> the Nilgiris perched at an altitude <strong>of</strong> 300 m (11°19’33ꞌꞌ N, 76°56ꞌ16ꞌꞌE).<br />

Multifunctional agr<strong>of</strong>orestry model (MFA)’ was developed at Forest College and Research<br />

Institute, Mettupalayam, Tamil Nadu, India especially designed based on the concept <strong>of</strong><br />

family farming and more specifically for small farmers. The designed MFA model comprises<br />

<strong>of</strong> 25 tree species and 08 intercrops covering 0.75 acre. It is unique model designed in a<br />

circular shape which is delineated to provide separate importance to each circle viz., high<br />

valued tree circle, timber circle, plywood circle, medicinal plants, fruits circle and moringa<br />

circle. The entire multifunctional agr<strong>of</strong>orestry was divided into four equal quadrats. The<br />

spacing between each circle is <strong>of</strong> five meter and each quadrat has different intercrops.<br />

Quadrat I is <strong>of</strong> flower block (Jasminum grandiflorum, Jasminum <strong>of</strong>ficinale), quadrat II is <strong>of</strong><br />

vegetable bock (crop selection differs for kharif and rabi), quadrat III comprises curry leaf<br />

(Murraya koeingii) and Nerium oleander, quadrat IV is <strong>of</strong> fodder grass block i.e., Guinea<br />

grass (Megathyrsus maximus) and Desmanthus (Desmanthus virgatus).Under this<br />

multifunctional model, ecosystem services were quantifiedi.e.,1.Provisioning services (food,<br />

fodder, fruits, timber, medicinal plants): Quantification was done in Kilograms and local<br />

market price was used for economic valuation. 2. Regulating services (Carbon sequestration):<br />

Non-destructive method was used and the carbon price <strong>of</strong> $4 (Neya et al., 2020) was used to<br />

calculate carbon revenue. Supporting services (Butterflies): Diversity <strong>of</strong> butterflies was<br />

estimated using Pollard walk method (Pollard and Yates, 1993). 4. Cultural services: two sets<br />

156 | Page<br />

Ecosystem based approaches for climate change adaptation, ecosystem services, integrated farming system models,<br />

Land degradation neutrality


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

<strong>of</strong> questionnaire were prepared and the respondents were asked to answer. Willingness to pay<br />

(WTP) method was followed for economic valuation. The total economic valuation <strong>of</strong> all<br />

these services was also calculated.<br />

Results<br />

The results revealed that the provisioning services delivered multiple outputs (timber/wood,<br />

food, fodder, flowers, fruits, fodders, medicinal plants and tree borne oil seeds) and also the<br />

value <strong>of</strong> provisioning service was Rs. 355103.20. This type <strong>of</strong> multifunctional agr<strong>of</strong>orestry<br />

possessing diversified outputs (food/fruits) reduces the chances <strong>of</strong> total crop failure which is<br />

more common in monoculture. Multifunctional agr<strong>of</strong>orestry possessing high tree densities<br />

with a mixture <strong>of</strong> species can accumulate a significant amount <strong>of</strong> carbon which is evident<br />

from the current investigation. Significantly higher biomass and carbon stock followed the<br />

order <strong>of</strong> Neolamarckia cadamba>Melia dubia>Lagerstroemia lanceoalata>Dalbergia<br />

latifolia>Tectona grandis. The total change in soil organic carbon stock over three years<br />

(2018-2021) was 32.05 Mg ha -1 and 11.55 Mg quadrat -1 respectively. The carbon revenue<br />

estimated from carbon sequestration <strong>of</strong> vegetation and soil was Rs.2812 and Rs.12844.40<br />

respectively. Under supporting services, a total <strong>of</strong> 37 butterflies species were sighted during<br />

the entire study period belonging to three families viz., Nymphalidae, Pieridae and<br />

Papilionidae indicated the supporting services <strong>of</strong> multifunctional agr<strong>of</strong>orestry. Observations<br />

on the butterfly diversity provide information about the variations in the species richness and<br />

abundance shaped by the vegetation along the landscape (Öckinger and Smith, 2006) and the<br />

species interactions. Among different indicators <strong>of</strong> socio-cultural services, education and<br />

scientific knowledge ranked foremost followed by relaxation and walking. The willingness to<br />

pay depicted an average <strong>of</strong> Rs.33 per visit per respondent. The multiple linear regression<br />

analysis indicated that multifunctional agr<strong>of</strong>orestry is a good fit (R 2 = 0.79) for studying<br />

cultural services.<br />

Conclusion<br />

The study recommends promotion <strong>of</strong> this multifunctional agr<strong>of</strong>orestry model across different<br />

land-use system in the country to create sustainable income and employment generation<br />

activities particularly in small and marginal land-use system.<br />

References<br />

Pollard, E., and Yates, T. J. 1993. Monitoring Butterfies for Ecology and Conservation.<br />

Chapman & Hall, London<br />

Neya, T., Abunyewa, A. A., Neya, O., Zoungrana, B. J., Dimobe, K., Tiendrebeogo H. and<br />

Magistro, J. 2020. Carbon sequestration potential and marketable carbon value <strong>of</strong><br />

smallholder agr<strong>of</strong>orestry Parklands across climatic zones <strong>of</strong> Burkina Faso: Current<br />

Ecosystem based approaches for climate change adaptation, ecosystem services, integrated farming system<br />

models, Land degradation neutrality<br />

157 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Status and Way Forward for REDD+ Implementation. Environ. Manage., 65(2), 203–<br />

211.<br />

Öckinger, E. and Smith, H. G. 2006. "Landscape composition and habitat area affects<br />

S.No<br />

butterfly species richness in semi-natural grasslands." Oecologia, 149(3):526-534.<br />

Economic analysis <strong>of</strong> ecosystem services from multifunctional agr<strong>of</strong>orestry<br />

Ecosystem<br />

services<br />

1. Provisioning<br />

Service<br />

nature/category<br />

Timber<br />

Nature <strong>of</strong><br />

benefit<br />

Valuation<br />

method<br />

Economic valuation (Rs.)<br />

I year II year III year<br />

- 28446.00<br />

Food 27732.50 101305.00<br />

Fruits - 7180.00<br />

Flowers<br />

Direct Market price<br />

59000.40 117792.00<br />

Fodder - 4788.00 7865.00<br />

Medicinal plants - 692.00<br />

Tree borne oil<br />

seeds<br />

78.10 224.20<br />

2. Regulating Carbon stock Indirect Carbon price - - 15625.09<br />

3. Socio-cultural Recreation Indirect<br />

Willingness to<br />

- - 3465.00<br />

pay<br />

Gross value <strong>of</strong> ecosystem services (direct and indirect) - 91599 288946.11<br />

Total expenditure incurred towards multifunctional agr<strong>of</strong>orestry 310970.00 292360.00 267740.00<br />

Net value <strong>of</strong> ecosystem services from multifunctional agr<strong>of</strong>orestry 310970.00 200761.00 21206.11<br />

T2-08R-1136<br />

Performance Evaluation <strong>of</strong> Ghungroo under Backyard Piggery Farming in<br />

South Garo Hills, Meghalaya - An Approach for Climate Change<br />

Adaptation<br />

Rupam Bhattacharjya*, Athokpam Haribhushan, Tanya R Marak,<br />

BishorjitNingthoujam, Thongam Monika Devi and Amarjit Karam<br />

Krishi Vigyan Kendra, South Garo Hills, Chokpot, Meghalaya, CAU, Imphal<br />

*rpmbhatta@gmail.com<br />

Backyard piggery farming is a part <strong>of</strong> farming systems mainly run by women farmers in rural<br />

areas. Pig farming contributes an important role especially for the socio-economic<br />

development <strong>of</strong> the weaker section <strong>of</strong> the society in the state <strong>of</strong> Meghalaya. Pig performance<br />

and productivity <strong>of</strong> non-descript local pigs under prevailing smallholder traditional pig<br />

production system is very low and poor exploitation <strong>of</strong> production potential due to shortage<br />

<strong>of</strong> feed and feed crops and high cost <strong>of</strong> commercial pig feed. Therefore, Krishi Vigyan<br />

158 | Page<br />

Ecosystem based approaches for climate change adaptation, ecosystem services, integrated farming system models,<br />

Land degradation neutrality


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Kendra, South Garo Hills introduced Ghungroo, a breed <strong>of</strong> pig which is mostly black<br />

coloured with typical Bull dog face appearance. Breed is popular because <strong>of</strong> high prolificacy,<br />

good mothering ability, docile nature and ability to sustain in low inputs. The present<br />

investigation was carried out to evaluate the reproductive and growth performance <strong>of</strong><br />

Ghungroo and local pig raised under existing low input tribal backyard pig rearing system.<br />

Methodology<br />

The present study conducted in three villages namely Bibragre, Dobogre and Dagalgopgre <strong>of</strong><br />

Chokpot block in South Garo Hills district <strong>of</strong> Meghalaya. Forty farmers from the three<br />

villages were selected and each farmer was given one Ghungroo piglet for further breeding<br />

programme. Then from each farmer, one piglet (F1 generation) was collected and given to<br />

another forty farmers to reach out maximum beneficiaries. The selected villages were visited<br />

once a week by the investigator over a period <strong>of</strong> One year seven months from February 2021<br />

to September 2022. Data on sow reproductive performance and productive performance were<br />

collected by providing structured pre-tested schedule and discussion with the farmers and<br />

visual appraisal for evaluation and validation. Weight <strong>of</strong> different age group <strong>of</strong> pigs were<br />

measured by electronic weighing machine and body length (cm) and chest girth (cm) by<br />

measuring tape in order to give reference to the farmers so that later can estimate the weight<br />

<strong>of</strong> all the pigs more accurately. The information on existing pig production system such as<br />

rearing pattern, feeding, and breeding management and disease prevalence were monitored,<br />

and in addition piglet pre-weaning and post weaning mortality was recorded during visits<br />

Results<br />

Results obtained in this study were age at puberty; age at first conception, age at first<br />

farrowing and inter farrowing interval were statistically (P


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Inter farrowing interval (months) 6.6±0.15 a 8.4±0.11 b<br />

Farrowing rate (%) 81.5±1.02 a 76.3±0.32 b<br />

Average litter size at birth 9.3±0.47 a 4.5±0.22 b<br />

Average litter size at weaning 6.9±0.46 a 3.21±0.11 b<br />

Means with different superscript within a row are statistically significant (P


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Kadirvel, G., Kumaresan, A., Das, A., Bujarbaruah, K.M., Venkatasubramanian, V.,<br />

Ngachan, S.V. 2013. Artificial insemination <strong>of</strong> pigs reared under smallholder<br />

production system in northeastern India: success rate, genetic improvement, and<br />

monetary benefit. Trop. Ani. Health Prod. 45(2):679-686.<br />

Kumar, S., Singh, S.K., Singh, R.L., Sharma, B.D., Dubey, C.B. 1990. Effects <strong>of</strong> genetic and<br />

non-genetic factors on body weight, efficiency <strong>of</strong> feed utilization, reproductive<br />

performance and survivability in Landrace, desi and their halfbreds. Ind J. Animal Sci.<br />

60(10):1219-1223.<br />

Sellier P. 1976. The basis <strong>of</strong> crossbreeding in pigs: A review. Livestock Production<br />

Science.3(3):203-226.<br />

Sharma BD, Dubey CB, Singh SK. A comparative study <strong>of</strong> growth in pure and crossbred<br />

pigs. Ind. J. <strong>of</strong> Animal Sci. 1990; (4):492-495.<br />

T2-09R-1216<br />

Documenting India’s Rainfed Mixed Indigenous Cropping Systems’<br />

Features and Design<br />

Prachi Patil 1 , V. Swaran 1 , A. Ravindra 1 , Shailesh Vyas 2 , Soumik Banerjee 3 , Lokappa<br />

Nayak 4 , K. Phaneesh 5 , P. Vipindas 3 , Shamika Mone 3 , Tarak Kate 6 , Siddhesh Sakore 7 ,<br />

Pramel Kumar 8 , Ritesh Guage 9 , Luna Panda 10 , Deepak Sharma 11<br />

1 Watershed Support Services and Activities Network (WASSAN), Hyderabad - 500068, Telangana<br />

2 SATVIK - Promoting Ecological Farming, Kachchh, Gujarat, – 370023<br />

3 Independent researcher from Jharkhand and Kerala<br />

4 India Foundation for Humanistic Development, Bengaluru, Karnataka – 560025, India<br />

5 Revitalising Rainfed Agriculture Network (RRAN) Hyderabad, Telangana – 500068, India<br />

6 Dharamitra, Wardha, Maharashtra - 442 001, India<br />

7 AGRO RANGERS, Rajgurunagar, Maharashtra – 410505, India<br />

8 Green Foundation, Bengaluru, Karnataka – 560094, India<br />

9 Samaj Pragati Sahayog, Dewas, Madhya Pradesh– 455227, India<br />

10 Pragati Foundation, Gurugram, Haryana-122101, India<br />

11 Equality Empowerment Foundation, Udaipur, Rajasthan, India<br />

The current year, 2022, has so far exposed the vulnerabilities <strong>of</strong> wheat and rice - India’s two<br />

major cereal crops - and the conventional cropping system in which it is grown, to a changing<br />

climate (Khan 2022). Unprecedented heat waves affected the wheat cultivation leading to a<br />

ban on its export in May, whereas the drought situation in the Indo-Gangetic Plain (IGP)<br />

states has impacted paddy cultivation leading to a ban/tariff on its exports in September<br />

(Bhardwaj and Jadhav 2022). These recent experiences from the green revolution belts <strong>of</strong><br />

Punjab and IGP draws our attention to the rainfed agriculture areas.<br />

Ecosystem based approaches for climate change adaptation, ecosystem services, integrated farming system<br />

models, Land degradation neutrality<br />

161 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

In spite <strong>of</strong> about 68% <strong>of</strong> non-food and 48% <strong>of</strong> the food cropped area under rainfed agriculture<br />

this ecosystem has historically not garnered the public and public policy makers' imagination<br />

in India. And within the rainfed areas, multi-cropping systems i.e., “growing more than one<br />

crop on the same piece <strong>of</strong> land during one calendar year” are relatively underexplored by the<br />

National Agricultural Research System (Beets 1975). These systems present an alternative to<br />

the dominant green revolution paradigm <strong>of</strong> agriculture. This exploratory study was hence<br />

undertaken to understand the design and features <strong>of</strong> indigenous multi-cropping systems <strong>of</strong><br />

India.<br />

Methodology<br />

The first step <strong>of</strong> the study involved identification <strong>of</strong> cropping system that has features like<br />

multi-cropping, one time sowing with multiple harvests at multiple times, multi-tier canopy,<br />

extended period <strong>of</strong> soil cover, selection <strong>of</strong> specific phenotypes etc. A detailed documentation<br />

<strong>of</strong> the selected cropping system was carried out by the research partners viz. NGOs and<br />

independent researchers after its selection by an expert panel consisted <strong>of</strong> senior researchers<br />

from NARS and NGOs.<br />

Between February and March 2022, research partners documented the following information<br />

<strong>of</strong> each cropping systems: cropping pattern, crop calendar, layout <strong>of</strong> the field, crop-risk<br />

mapping, time trends, soil and dietary nutrient flows and resource mapping.<br />

Multiple research methods employed in the study for documenting the aforementioned<br />

features include review <strong>of</strong> literature, focus group discussions, key informant interviews,<br />

visual documentation <strong>of</strong> the cropping practices (where it is still in practice).The twelve<br />

cropping systems and their locations documented in this study.<br />

Mixed Indigenous Cropping Systems Documented in the Present Study<br />

162 | Page<br />

Ecosystem based approaches for climate change adaptation, ecosystem services, integrated farming system models,<br />

Land degradation neutrality


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Results<br />

Some common design principles <strong>of</strong> the cropping systems discerned during the workshop have<br />

implications for climate resilience. It includes the regular harvest <strong>of</strong> edible crops from its<br />

multi-tire mix <strong>of</strong> crops and its varieties viz. millets/cereals, pulses, oilseeds and vegetables,<br />

soil cover for seven to nine months, resource utilization complementarity between main crops<br />

and companion crops and use <strong>of</strong> border crops as windbreak and pest infestation barriers.<br />

Multiple harvesting <strong>of</strong> different crops from two to three months after sowing, gave food and<br />

nutrition security for the rainfed farmers along with stable source income. Inbuild resilience<br />

in the traditional multi cropping system reduced the risk <strong>of</strong> crop failure due to variability in<br />

rainfall and pest and disease infestation.<br />

Conclusion<br />

This study opens up region-specific traditional alternatives for mainstream cropping systems<br />

with climate resilience built into. These rainfed mixed-multi-cropping systems have potential<br />

applications in addressing existing crises in our agri-food systems, farmer livelihoods and<br />

could inform the practice and the public policy <strong>of</strong> rainfed area agriculture.<br />

References<br />

Bhardwaj, M. and Jadhav, R., 2022. India curbed rice exports after rise in shipments lifts<br />

local prices, Reuters. Thomson Reuters. Available at:<br />

https://www.reuters.com/markets/asia/india-restricted-rice-exports-rising-shipmentslift-local-prices-govt-<strong>of</strong>ficial-2022-09-09/<br />

(Accessed: September 20, 2022).<br />

Beets, W. C.,1975. Multiple-cropping practices in Asia and the Far East. Agric. and environ.<br />

2(3), 219-228.<br />

Khan, M.A., 2022. Monsoon 2022: Jharkhand farmers give up on Paddy Harvest due to<br />

scanty rains,Down To Earth. Available at: https://www.downtoearth.org.in<br />

/news/climate-change/monsoon-2022-jharkhand-farmers-give-up-on-paddy-harvestdue-to-scanty-rains-84498.<br />

Ecosystem based approaches for climate change adaptation, ecosystem services, integrated farming system<br />

models, Land degradation neutrality<br />

163 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

T2-10R-1264<br />

Akkadi: A Sustainable Livelihood Cropping System in Raichur District <strong>of</strong><br />

Karnataka<br />

Lokappa Nayak 1 , Prachi Patil 2 , Mallikarjun Patil 1 , V. Swaran 2<br />

1<br />

India Foundation for Humanistic Development, Bengaluru, Karnataka, 560025, 2 Watershed<br />

Support Services and Activities Network, Hyderabad, Telangana, 500068<br />

An exploratory research study on an indigenous multi-cropping system, locally known as<br />

Akkadi, was undertaken in the Kannal village <strong>of</strong> Raichur district (Karnataka). Akkadi is an<br />

indigenous cropping system where rainfed farmers grow combinations <strong>of</strong> millets, pulses, oil<br />

seeds, and vegetables on the same farm land, same time. In this thoughtfully evolved<br />

traditional cropping system <strong>of</strong> Akkadi, crops are combined in such a manner that harvesting<br />

<strong>of</strong> crops starts from the second month after sowing and continues up to nine months.<br />

Pigeonpea, sorghum/pearl Millet crops constitute major proportion in Akkadi cropping<br />

system relative to the greengram, cowpea, moth bean, roselle, castor, and beans. The crop<br />

layout consists <strong>of</strong> three rows <strong>of</strong> sorghum or pearl Millet crop followed by a row <strong>of</strong> red gram<br />

intercrop (Fig). The row-to-row spacing between sorghum or pearl millet crop is 30 cm.<br />

To document the indigenous cropping system <strong>of</strong> Akkadi traditionally practiced in Lingusur<br />

and Maski tehsil <strong>of</strong> Raichur districts and understand the its design principles.<br />

Methodology<br />

Study Area: Akkadiis traditionally practiced in Lingusur and Maski tehsil <strong>of</strong> Raichur district<br />

Karnataka. Study was conducted in Kannal village 15°56'18.9"N& 76°28'31.6"E <strong>of</strong><br />

Maskitehsil. The study was conducted in three steps. The first step was to explore the existing<br />

traditional cropping system through network groups. Cropping system was selected based on<br />

the characteristics such as multi-crops, one-time sowing with multiple harvests at multiple<br />

times, multi-tier, covers soils for a longer duration, and specific phenotypes <strong>of</strong> crops in the<br />

system. Detailed analytical documentation <strong>of</strong> the identified traditional cropping system was<br />

done, with focus group discussions, key informants interviews, and field visits. Researchers<br />

along with the panel <strong>of</strong> experts, analysed the documentation and evaluated the system for<br />

identification <strong>of</strong> any design principles guiding the traditional cropping system.<br />

164 | Page<br />

Ecosystem based approaches for climate change adaptation, ecosystem services, integrated farming system models,<br />

Land degradation neutrality


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Results<br />

Akkadi Cropping System Layout Cover Duration <strong>of</strong> crop and<br />

soil cover<br />

The results <strong>of</strong> this exploratory study are analyses using following principle: multi-crops, one<br />

time sowing with multiple harvests at multiple times, multi-tier, covers soils for longer<br />

duration, specific phenotypes <strong>of</strong> crops and rainfall use efficiency<br />

Crop Diversity and its phenotypes:<br />

Akkadi cropping system is a glide <strong>of</strong> crops consisting <strong>of</strong> millets, pulses, oil seeds, and<br />

vegetables. Akkadi cropping system has different crop combination models, practiced based<br />

on the requirement <strong>of</strong> rainfed farmers. Crop combination with different maturity period, and a<br />

specific phenology helps the crops to complement each other growth.<br />

Multi-tier cropping system with multiple harvestings<br />

The Akkadi cropping system has crop combinations <strong>of</strong> varying heights (1 to 12ft) and<br />

maturity period (three to nine months), at any given point <strong>of</strong> time one can see some crops<br />

ready to harvest whereas other at their vegetative stage protecting the soil cover and<br />

improving its health because <strong>of</strong> crop biomass refer Crop combination <strong>of</strong> varying heights, root<br />

depths, maturing stages, harness sunlight, soil moisture, soil nutrient, and land space most<br />

effectively.<br />

Rainfall use efficiency: The hot arid climate <strong>of</strong> Lingusur region is subjected to prolonged<br />

dry spells and the erratic nature <strong>of</strong> rainfall.22% <strong>of</strong> the total annual average rainfall (599 mm)<br />

Ecosystem based approaches for climate change adaptation, ecosystem services, integrated farming system<br />

models, Land degradation neutrality<br />

165 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

is received during October to February month. Long duration crops <strong>of</strong> Akkadi system<br />

effectively utilises this rainfall.<br />

Household Nutrition<br />

With this indigenous farming system, rainfed farmers have access to food high in calories,<br />

protein and dietary fibre. This system ensures annual food and nutrition for the rainfed<br />

farmers and fodder security for livestock.<br />

Conclusion<br />

The study on the indigenous multi-cropping system <strong>of</strong> Akkadi demonstrates that traditional<br />

knowledge is core to adaptive changes using available resources essential to face climate<br />

change, the nutrition quality <strong>of</strong> food, and other current issues related to the mono-cropping<br />

system. Policy-level interventions for understanding these cropping systems and their<br />

mainstreaming are the need <strong>of</strong> the hour. Decentralized agroecological approaches and<br />

participatory research methods for establishing scientific evidence on biophysical and socioeconomic<br />

parameters <strong>of</strong> indigenous multi-cropping systems are needed to revitalize rainfed<br />

agriculture.<br />

T2-11R-1559<br />

Carbon Sequestration as a Major Regulating Ecosystem Service from<br />

Dryland Agr<strong>of</strong>orestry Systems<br />

K. B. Sridhar*, G. Ravindra Chary 2 , Mudlagiriappa 3 , M.S Shirahatti 4 ., S.B Patil 5 ., M.<br />

R. Umesh 6 , B. Narsimlu 7 , K.A. Gopinath 8<br />

1,2,7,8 , All India Coordinated Research Project on Dryland Agriculture, CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

3 AICRPDA Centre, UAS Bengaluru, Karnataka, India<br />

4,5 AICRPDA Centre, UAS Dharwad, Karnataka, India<br />

6 AICRPDA Centre, UAS Raichur, Karnataka, India<br />

*sriaranya@gmail.com<br />

Trees are the largest terrestrial sink <strong>of</strong> carbon dioxide. Agr<strong>of</strong>orestry systems serve as a C sink<br />

and help mitigate GHG emissions from agriculture (Duguma et al., 2017). The potential <strong>of</strong><br />

agr<strong>of</strong>orestry in carbon capture and storage varies with the type <strong>of</strong> agr<strong>of</strong>orestry practiced, the<br />

tree species used and climatic zones (Kuyah et al., 2019).Agr<strong>of</strong>orestry has been recognized as<br />

having the greatest potential for C sequestration <strong>of</strong> all the land uses analyzed in the LULUCF<br />

report <strong>of</strong> the IPCC (2000).Agr<strong>of</strong>orestry systems are believed to have a higher potential to<br />

sequester carbon (C) because <strong>of</strong> their perceived ability for greater capture and utilization <strong>of</strong><br />

growth resources (light, nutrients, and water than single-species crop or pasture systems (Nair<br />

et al., 2010) About 50% <strong>of</strong> tree dry biomass is considered as carbon. As the trees grow, they<br />

sequester carbon in their tissues and release oxygen into the atmosphere. Land use systems<br />

166 | Page<br />

Ecosystem based approaches for climate change adaptation, ecosystem services, integrated farming system models,<br />

Land degradation neutrality


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

involving trees have the potential to positively impact climate change by reducing<br />

atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) and providing long-term carbon (C) storage. Agr<strong>of</strong>orestry<br />

<strong>of</strong>fers greater potential to increase C sequestration <strong>of</strong> predominantly agriculture-dominated<br />

landscapes than mono-crop agriculture by storing C in above- and belowground biomass,<br />

soil, and living and dead organisms and further extending the duration <strong>of</strong> C in soils. Trees<br />

reduce the amount <strong>of</strong> carbon in the atmosphere by sequestering carbon in new growth every<br />

year. The amount <strong>of</strong> carbon annually sequestered is increased with the size and health <strong>of</strong> the<br />

tree. The CO 2 Fix model is an easy-to-use model which simulates carbon in trees, soil and<br />

wood products as well. The objective <strong>of</strong> this study was to quantify carbon in trees in major<br />

agr<strong>of</strong>orestry systems practiced in different agroclimatic zones and altitudinal gradients <strong>of</strong><br />

different rainfed agro-ecologies.<br />

Methodology<br />

The study was conducted at three centers <strong>of</strong> All India Coordinated Research on Dryland<br />

agriculture. The agr<strong>of</strong>orestry systems comprised <strong>of</strong> Melia dubia (semi-arid vertisols) at<br />

Raichur, Karnataka, Custard apple-based and Aonla-based agr<strong>of</strong>orestry systems (semi-arid<br />

alfisols) at Bengaluru Karnataka, and Tamarind and guava-based agr<strong>of</strong>orestry systems (semiarid<br />

vertisols) at vijaypura, Karnataka. The CO2 Fix model was usedto quantify carbon<br />

sequestration potential. This model simulates carbon in trees, soil and wood products as<br />

well.The present method is purely based on CAI (Current Annual Increment). The trees were<br />

categorized as fast-growing and slow-growing based on their nature <strong>of</strong> growth. Where Melia<br />

dubia was categorized as fast-growing (specific gravity -0.34), Tamarindus indica (specific<br />

gravity -0.72), Emblica<strong>of</strong>ficianalis (specific gravity -0.78), and Annona squamosa (specific<br />

gravity -0.65) was categorized as slow growing respectively.<br />

Results<br />

It was evident from the table that Melia dubia recorded the highest carbon sequestration<br />

potential 6.74 Mg C ha -1 yr -1 followed by Guava and Custard apple (4.40) and (4.41) Mg C<br />

ha -1 yr -1 respectively. The least was noticed in Aonla (2.16) and Tamarind-based agr<strong>of</strong>orestry<br />

system (3.72). the net carbon sequestered in agr<strong>of</strong>orestry systems over the simulated period<br />

<strong>of</strong> thirty years was found maximum in Melia dubia-based agr<strong>of</strong>orestry systems 201.54 Mg C<br />

ha -1 yr -1 and the least was noticed in Aonla-based agr<strong>of</strong>orestry systems. 64.80 Mg C ha-1yr-1.<br />

Ecosystem based approaches for climate change adaptation, ecosystem services, integrated farming system<br />

models, Land degradation neutrality<br />

167 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Estimated carbon sequestration potential <strong>of</strong> agr<strong>of</strong>orestry systems (Mg C ha -1 yr -1 )<br />

Parameters<br />

Melia<br />

dubia<br />

Tamarind Guava Custard<br />

apple<br />

Aonla<br />

Location Raichur Vijayapura Vijayapura Bengaluru Bengaluru<br />

Geographical Location<br />

Latitude (degrees) 16°11’<br />

34’’<br />

16° 46’<br />

5.1’’<br />

16° 46’<br />

5.1’’<br />

13° 5’14’’ 13° 5’14’’<br />

Longitude (degrees) 77° 19’<br />

01’’<br />

75° 44’<br />

42.4’’<br />

75° 44’<br />

42.4’’<br />

77°<br />

34’12’’<br />

77°<br />

34’12’’<br />

Spacing (M) 5 X 5 10X3 3.5 X3.5 5X5 5X5<br />

Number <strong>of</strong> trees/ hectare 400 333 816 400 400<br />

Year <strong>of</strong> establishment 2017 2014 2018 2009 2008<br />

Tree Biomass<br />

(above and<br />

below ground )<br />

in Mg DM ha -1<br />

Tree Biomass<br />

carbon<br />

(Mg C ha -1 )<br />

Baseline Biomass 21.39 44.54 42.23 31.87 20.69<br />

Simulated 441.27 277.55 317.62 307.81 155.70<br />

Baseline Carbon 10.26 21.37 20.27 15.29 9.93<br />

Simulated<br />

211.80 133.22 152.45 147.74 74.73<br />

Net carbon sequestered in<br />

agr<strong>of</strong>orestry systems over the<br />

simulated period <strong>of</strong> thirty<br />

years<br />

Carbon<br />

sequestered<br />

(Mg C ha -1 )<br />

Estimated carbon<br />

sequestration potential <strong>of</strong><br />

agr<strong>of</strong>orestry system (Mg C<br />

ha -1 yr -1 )<br />

201.54 111.84 132.18 132.45 64.80<br />

6.74 3.72 4.40 4.41 2.16<br />

Conclusion<br />

Agr<strong>of</strong>orestry has the potential to provide both economic and environmental benefits. IPCC<br />

has recognized agr<strong>of</strong>orestry as having the highest C sequestration potential <strong>of</strong> any land<br />

management system. The greater the land area that is occupied by trees, the greater the<br />

impact on atmospheric C. Agr<strong>of</strong>orestry systems play an effective role in global carbon<br />

sequestration, involved in carbon capture and long-term storage <strong>of</strong> atmospheric carbon<br />

dioxide. There is a need to promote short rotation and fast-growing trees for quicker capture<br />

and storage <strong>of</strong> carbon di oxide.<br />

168 | Page<br />

Ecosystem based approaches for climate change adaptation, ecosystem services, integrated farming system models,<br />

Land degradation neutrality


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

References<br />

Duguma LA, Nzyoka J, Minang PA, Bernard F. 2017. How Agr<strong>of</strong>orestry Propels Achievement <strong>of</strong><br />

Nationally Determined Contributions. ICRAF Policy Brief no. 34. World Agr<strong>of</strong>orestry<br />

Centre, Nairobi, Kenya.<br />

Shem Kuyah, Cory W. Whitney, Mattias Jonsson, Gudeta W. Sileshi, IngridÖborn, Catherine W.<br />

Muthuri, Eike Luedeling. 2019. Agr<strong>of</strong>orestry delivers a win-win solution for ecosystem<br />

services in sub-Saharan Africa. A meta-analysis. Agronomy for Sustainable Development.<br />

39:47.<br />

Udawatta RP, Walter D, Jose S. Carbon sequestration by forests and agr<strong>of</strong>orests: a reality check for<br />

the United States. Carbon Footprints 2022; 1:8. http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/cf.2022.06.<br />

P.K Ramachandran Nair, Vimala D.Nair, B. Mohan Kumar and Julia M. Showalter., 2010. Carbon<br />

sequestration in Agr<strong>of</strong>orestry systems. Advances in Agronomy. 108: 237-307.<br />

T2-11aR-1591<br />

Integrated Farming for Food and Nutrition Security <strong>of</strong> Small Farmers<br />

Besides Making the System Self-Reliant<br />

B. Bhargavi 1* , Umakanta Behera 2 , Swarna Ronanki 3 , G Ravindra Chary 1 , H.B.<br />

Santosh 1 , K.B. Sridhar 1 , B. Narsimlu 1 and V.K. Singh 1<br />

1 ICAR-Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, Hyderabad 500059, Telangana, India<br />

2 College <strong>of</strong> Agriculture, Kyrdemkulai, CAU, Meghalaya 793103, India<br />

3<br />

ICAR- Indian Institute <strong>of</strong> Millets Research, Hyderabad 500030, Telangana, India<br />

*bhargavi.bussa@icar.gov.in<br />

The conventional monoculture practice without multi-disciplinary approach is unsustainable<br />

in meeting the food and nutritional security as well as the livelihood <strong>of</strong> smallholders<br />

(Mahapatra and Behera, 2011). Due to low purchasing capacity <strong>of</strong> small and marginal<br />

farmers, it is difficult for them to maintain an optimum level <strong>of</strong> nutritive food intake, leaving<br />

them undernourished. It is irony that farmers who supply the food are the poorest and most<br />

hungry population group in developing countries. According to the estimates, 39% <strong>of</strong> the<br />

total Indian population are undernourished with majority <strong>of</strong> them in rural areas (Rawal et al.,<br />

2019). Integrated farming system provides nutrition security to a farmers’ family through the<br />

production <strong>of</strong> diversified food commodities such as cereal, pulses, oilseeds, vegetables, fruits,<br />

egg, milk, fish, meat etc. The higher returns from IFS were not only due to higher<br />

productivity but also due to lower cost <strong>of</strong> production, as by-products <strong>of</strong> various components<br />

are recycled within the system (Bhargavi and Behera 2020). In India, farming systems<br />

research has been largely focused on enhancing production, productivity and pr<strong>of</strong>itability<br />

without much emphasis on nutritional and energy outcomes. In this regard, this present study<br />

Ecosystem based approaches for climate change adaptation, ecosystem services, integrated farming system<br />

models, Land degradation neutrality<br />

169 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

was taken up to develop an IFS model that can ensure food and nutritional security for small<br />

land holders.<br />

Methodology<br />

This study was carried out during 2015-18 at ICAR-IARI, New Delhi on IFS encompassing<br />

crops (maize, pea, mustard, green gram, cotton, wheat, bottle gourd, onion and okra), dairy,<br />

fishery, duckery, poultry, biogas plant, fruit trees and agro-forestry on 1.0 ha area. Five<br />

cropping systems i.e., maize – pea – okra, maize – mustard – green gram, cotton – wheat,<br />

bottle gourd – onion and okra – wheat were taken up on 0.625 ha. Dairy unit with three<br />

crossbred cows (2 Holstein Friesian and 1 Jersey) was maintained. A biogas plant <strong>of</strong> Khadi<br />

and Village Industries Commission (KVIC) model <strong>of</strong> 2 m 3 capacity was established beside<br />

the dairy. Fisheries component was introduced through a fish pond covering an area <strong>of</strong> 1000<br />

m 2 with 50 m length, 20 m width and 2 m depth. Composite pisciculture was practiced with<br />

four species viz., catla (Catla catla), rohu (Labeo rohita), mrigal (Cirrhinus mrigala) and<br />

grass carp (Ctenopharyngodon idella) <strong>of</strong> different feeding habits were stocked together in<br />

ratio <strong>of</strong> 3:4:3:2. A low cost poultry house has been constructed on the fish pond in which<br />

poultry birds <strong>of</strong> Aseel- 12, Kadaknath-14, Ankleswar-12, and Nikobari-12 were reared.<br />

Thirty-five ducklings (8 months old) <strong>of</strong> Khaki Campbell breed, were brought into the duck<br />

house. Ducks range and remain in the fish pond during the day time and shelter in the shed at<br />

night. Thirty-seven Kinnow (Citrus reticulata), 30 lemon (Citrus limon), 15 banana (Musa<br />

paradisiaca) plants were grown all along the farm boundary with 4 m spacing between<br />

plants. Ten guava (Psidium guajava) and 10 mango (Mangifera indica) and 21 moringa<br />

(Moringa oleifera) trees were planted on the fish pond dyke for fruit production. Entire 1.0 ha<br />

farm was protected with barbed wire fence. The country bean (Lablab purpureus) and<br />

Spinach (Basella rubra) were raised along the fence.<br />

Results<br />

According to the dietary guidelines for Indians (NIN, ICMR, 2011), a balanced diet <strong>of</strong> a<br />

small family with 2 adults and 3 children daily needs 1450 g <strong>of</strong> cereals, 300 g <strong>of</strong> pulses, 1600<br />

g <strong>of</strong> vegetable, 2100 ml <strong>of</strong> milk and 500 g <strong>of</strong> fruits. In the present study IFS produced diverse<br />

food products i.e., 2 cereals (wheat, maize); 2 pulses (green gram, pea); 1 oilseed (mustard); 1<br />

fibre crop (cotton); 6 vegetables (okra, onion, bottle gourd, brinjal, spinach, bean); 5 fruits<br />

(guava (Psidium guajava), mango (Mangifera indica), mandarin (Citrus reticulate), acid lime<br />

(Citrus limon), banana (Musa paradisiaca). Annual milk yield from 3 dairy cows was 11553<br />

litres, with 30 litres production per day. From the small duckery unit 5059 eggs (14 eggs/day)<br />

were produced from 12,168 duck days in a year with an average egg production <strong>of</strong> 41.6 % <strong>of</strong><br />

the total duck days. A total <strong>of</strong> 2805 eggs were produced from poultry unit annually from<br />

13046 hen days with an average egg production <strong>of</strong> 21.5% <strong>of</strong> the total hen days. A total <strong>of</strong><br />

170 | Page<br />

Ecosystem based approaches for climate change adaptation, ecosystem services, integrated farming system models,<br />

Land degradation neutrality


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

7864 eggs were produced annually <strong>of</strong> which family requirement is 1500 eggs year -1 . Annual<br />

meat production from IFS was 160 kgs (live birds weight). The total fish biomass production<br />

was 759 kg from 0.1 ha area <strong>of</strong> pond. IFS provided farmer’s family, an excellent quality <strong>of</strong><br />

protein from fish and meat, which he was unable to purchase due to his low purchasing<br />

power. The high nutritional value <strong>of</strong> egg, fish, milk, meat overcome the undernourishment <strong>of</strong><br />

vulnerable groups such as infants and pre-school children, pregnant and lactating women<br />

(Edwards, 2000). The results (table 2) indicated that out <strong>of</strong> total production <strong>of</strong> cereals,<br />

vegetables, fruits, oilseed and milk, 55, 71, 77, 68 and 93% was marketable surplus,<br />

respectively. An IFS is more secure in the supply <strong>of</strong> food as it has a diversified/greater<br />

number <strong>of</strong> food species than the commercial farming system (Behera et al., 2018). Farmers<br />

could ‘grow everything they eat and eat everything they grow’, which reflects the King’s<br />

philosophy <strong>of</strong> self-sufficiency. Apart from increased household nutrition and income, the<br />

added benefits <strong>of</strong> IFS are local availability <strong>of</strong> fresh products and the provision <strong>of</strong> employment<br />

for household members (Bhargavi and Behera, 2020).<br />

Annual production and surplus <strong>of</strong> farm produce in IFS<br />

S. No. Produce Annual production Annual family requirement<br />

(kg)<br />

Annual<br />

(kg)<br />

1. Cereals 1444 kg 654 (45) 790 (55)<br />

2. Pulses 150 kg 109 (73) 41 (27)<br />

3. Vegetables 2045 kg 584 (29) 1461 (71)<br />

4. Fruits 802 kg 182 (23) 620 (77)<br />

5. Oilseed 113 kg 36 (32) 77 (68)<br />

6. Milk 11553 litres 766 (7) 10787 (93)<br />

7. Egg 7864 No. 1500 (23) 7864 (77)<br />

*values in parentheses indicate the percentage <strong>of</strong> total production<br />

Conclusion<br />

surplus<br />

IFS produced diverse food products i.e., 6 field crops produce, 6 vegetables, 5 fruits, milk,<br />

eggs, meat and fish. Out <strong>of</strong> total production <strong>of</strong> cereals, vegetables, fruits, oilseed and milk,<br />

45, 29, 23, 32 and 7% was family requirement and the rest 55, 71, 77, 68 and 93% was<br />

marketable surplus respectively. IFS make the farmer self-sufficient in terms <strong>of</strong> ensuring<br />

family members a balanced diet for leading a healthy life. Further direct benefits from IFS,<br />

apart from increased household nutrition and income, are local availability <strong>of</strong> fresh products<br />

and the provision <strong>of</strong> employment for household members.<br />

References<br />

Ecosystem based approaches for climate change adaptation, ecosystem services, integrated farming system<br />

models, Land degradation neutrality<br />

171 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Behera, U. K., Bhargavi, B., Meena, S.L., Raj Singh, Singh, V.K. 2018. Integrated farming<br />

system model for livelihood security and doubling the Income <strong>of</strong> small and marginal<br />

farmers under changing climate scenario. Indian Farming. 68: 32–36.<br />

Behera, U. K., Mahapatra, I.C. 1999. Income and employment generation for small and<br />

marginal farmers through integrated farming systems. Indian J. Agron. 44(3): 431-<br />

439.<br />

Bhargavi, B., Behera, U.K. 2020. Securing the livelihood <strong>of</strong> small and marginal farmers by<br />

diversifying farming systems. Curr Sci. 119: 854-860.<br />

Dietary guidelines for Indians 2011 - A Manual, NIN, ICMR, pp-91.<br />

Rawal, V., Bansal, V., Bansal, P. 2019. Prevalence <strong>of</strong> undernourishment in Indian states.<br />

Economic & Political Weekly 54 (15):35.<br />

T2-12R-1626<br />

Rainfed Integrated Farming System (RIFS) Model for Assuredrainfall<br />

Zone <strong>of</strong> Marathwada Region<br />

R.S. Raut, W.N. Narkhede, M.S. Pendke, P.H. Gourkhede, S.S. Suryavanshi<br />

A.S. Gunjkar<br />

All India Coordinated Research Project for Dryland Agriculture<br />

Vasantrao Naik Marathwada Krishi Vidyapeeth, Parbhani (Maharashtra) India 431 402<br />

Rainfed Integrated Farming System (RIFS) entail a holistic approach to farming aimed at<br />

meeting multiple demands. RIFS are characterized by temporal and spatial mixing <strong>of</strong> crops,<br />

livestock, goatry, poultry along with dryland horticulture and other allied activities in a single<br />

farm. Thereby, they cater the needs <strong>of</strong> small and marginal farmers. Traditional rainfed<br />

farming system was in existence in the domain districts <strong>of</strong> Marathwada region. A details<br />

survey <strong>of</strong> traditional RIFS was conducted in the area and found that crops + large ruminants /<br />

small ruminants are the common RIFS in this area. On station experiment was conducted to<br />

assess the net income from various components as well as to strengthen and recommend the<br />

model <strong>of</strong> the RIFS in assured rainfall zone <strong>of</strong> Marathwada region for 1 ha area. This model<br />

was tested from 2017-18 to 2021-22 with 0.60 ha area under crop components viz soybean –<br />

rabi sorghum, soybean chickpea cropping system, soybean pigeonpea (4:2) intercropping,<br />

cotton + soybean (1:1) intercropping on 0.15 ha area each. Area <strong>of</strong> 0.12 ha for fodder ,0.16<br />

for rainfed fruit crops 0.05 area for goat keeping and poultry birds and 0.078 area for farm<br />

pond was allotted. Under goatery component (7 + 1) and under poultry 100 birds <strong>of</strong> 1 batch<br />

was taken for study, fruit crops (mango and custard apple) was taken under horticulture<br />

component. During the year 2017-18 the net income from cropping system was Rs. 37990/-<br />

172 | Page<br />

Ecosystem based approaches for climate change adaptation, ecosystem services, integrated farming system models,<br />

Land degradation neutrality


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

which was increased to Rs. 42780/- in the year 2021-22. The income from goatery was Rs.<br />

29896/- in the year 2018-19 which increased to Rs. 64060/- in the year 2021-22. The total net<br />

income from this model was Rs. 39369/- in the year 2017-18 which increased to Rs. 127245/-<br />

in the year 2021-22. After a period <strong>of</strong> 5 years since its establishment, the net money returns<br />

Rs.42780/- were received from crops and cropping system. Similarly, the net return <strong>of</strong> Rs.<br />

84465/- were received from other allied activities like fodder, horticulture, goat and poultry.<br />

Overall net return <strong>of</strong> Rs. 127245/- was received from 1 ha. RIFS model.<br />

T2-13P-1036<br />

Maize and Black gram Strip-Intercropping System for Higher Productivity<br />

and Economics under Rainfed Conditions<br />

Anil Khokhar*, M.J. Singh, Abrar Yousuf, Mohammad Amin Bhat, Parminder Singh<br />

Sandhu and Balwinder Singh Dhillon<br />

Punjab Agricultural University-Regional Research Station, AICRPDA Centre Ballowal Saunkhri,<br />

Balachaur, Punjab 144521, India<br />

*anilkhokhar@pau.edu<br />

In the rainfed Kandi region <strong>of</strong> Punjab intercropping <strong>of</strong> maize with blackgram, and greengram<br />

has been found to increase productivity, pr<strong>of</strong>itability, improve soil health, reduce soil erosion<br />

and conserve soil moisture (Khokhar et al., 2021). But these intercropping systems are labour<br />

intensive and create hindrances in the use <strong>of</strong> agricultural machinery for weed control,<br />

harvesting, threshing etc. Strip-intercropping could be a viable strategy to overcome the<br />

disadvantages <strong>of</strong> traditional intercropping systems. In strip intercropping, the width <strong>of</strong> the<br />

strip is wide enough to allow independent cultivation <strong>of</strong> component crops grown but the<br />

strips are close enough for the crops to interact agronomically. Maize is the most important<br />

cereal crop cultivated under rainfed conditions in the Shivalik foothills region <strong>of</strong> North India<br />

(popularly called Kandi region) during kharif while blackgram is the most important among<br />

the pulses which is cultivated in this region during kharif. Maize and blackgram stripintercropping<br />

system may not only meet the cereal and pulse requirements <strong>of</strong> the people in<br />

this region but it may also increase the pr<strong>of</strong>itability and sustain the income <strong>of</strong> the farmers. In<br />

maize and blackgram strip-intercropping system, identification <strong>of</strong> optimum strip width is <strong>of</strong><br />

prime importance. But, little or no research has been conducted in the assessment <strong>of</strong> the<br />

optimum strip width for maize and blackgram strip-intercropping system which performs<br />

better than sole cropping <strong>of</strong> these crops. Thus, a field experiment was conducted for three<br />

years to find out the optimum strip width to increase the productivity and pr<strong>of</strong>itability <strong>of</strong><br />

maize and blackgram strip-cropping as compared to sole cropping.<br />

Methodology<br />

Ecosystem based approaches for climate change adaptation, ecosystem services, integrated farming system<br />

models, Land degradation neutrality<br />

173 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

A field experiment was conducted during the rainy (kharif) season in 2019, 2020 and 2021<br />

under rainfed conditions in a randomised block design with 4 replications. There were 6<br />

treatments with different strip widths <strong>of</strong> maize and blackgram, which included maize strip 3<br />

m wide and black gram 2.4 m(T1), maizestrip6 m wide and black gram 2.4 m (T2),<br />

maizestrip3 m wide and black gram 4.8 m (T3) , maize strip 6 m wide and black gram 4.8 m<br />

(T 4), sole maize (T 5) and sole black gram (T 6).The maize variety PMH-1 was sown at a<br />

spacing <strong>of</strong> 60 cm x 20 cm and blackgram variety mash-114 was sown at 30 cm x 10 cm<br />

spacing respectively using 20 kg seed per hectare for each crop. The crops were harvested<br />

from the last week <strong>of</strong> September to the first week <strong>of</strong> October during three years <strong>of</strong><br />

experimentation.<br />

Results<br />

Strip-intercropping <strong>of</strong> maize and black gram resulted in higher yield than sole crops <strong>of</strong> maize<br />

and black gram. The highest maize equivalent yield (MEY) was recorded in maize strip 6 m<br />

wide and black gram 2.4 m (3439 kgha -1 ) which was significantly higher overthe sole crop <strong>of</strong><br />

maize by 11.3% and black gram by 14.8% but at par with maize and black gram stripintercropping<br />

systems. The highest LER (1.14), rain water use efficiency (4.98kg ha -1 mm -1 )<br />

and net returns (Rs 40393 ha -1 ) was recorded with maize and black gram strip-intercropping<br />

in 6 m and 2.4 m, respectively. However, the BC ratio (2.32) was highest in maize strip 3 m<br />

and black gram strip width 4.8 m followed by 6 m and 2.4 m strip width (2.27).<br />

Effect <strong>of</strong> strip intercropping <strong>of</strong> maize and blackgram on maize equivalent yield (MEY),<br />

land equivalent ratios (LER), economics and rain water use efficiency (RWUE) (mean<br />

Treatments<br />

Maize 3 m strip and<br />

blackgram 2.4 m strip<br />

Maize 6 m strip and<br />

blackgram 2.4 m strip<br />

Maize 3 m strip and<br />

blackgram 4.8 m strip<br />

Maize 6 m strip and<br />

blackgram 4.8 m strip<br />

data <strong>of</strong> 3 year)<br />

Yield (kg ha -1 )<br />

Net<br />

RWUE<br />

B:C<br />

MEY LER returns<br />

Maize Blackgram (Rs ha -1 ratio<br />

) (kg ha -1 mm -1 )<br />

2119 403 3346 1.11 37891 2.25 4.70<br />

2589 279 3439 1.14 40393 2.27 4.98<br />

1420 591 3213 1.08 35991 2.32 4.27<br />

1997 425 3288 1.10 37221 2.25 4.57<br />

Sole maize at 60 cm x 20 cm 3052 - 3052 - 31348 1.84 4.69<br />

Sole blackgram at 30 cm x<br />

10 cm<br />

- 972 2931 - 32226 2.18 4.35<br />

CD (0.05) 125 60.0 263 0.10 5237 0.19 0.345<br />

Rainfall (mm) 659<br />

174 | Page<br />

Ecosystem based approaches for climate change adaptation, ecosystem services, integrated farming system models,<br />

Land degradation neutrality


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Conclusion<br />

Results <strong>of</strong> this three-year study indicated that maize and blackgram strip-intercropping<br />

system is more effective than a monoculture system in resource utilization. The cultivation <strong>of</strong><br />

maize in6 m wide strip and blackgram in 2.4 m wide or maize in3 m wide strip and<br />

blackgram in 2.4 m wide strip is the most efficient strip-intercropping system to get higher<br />

yield and economics than other combinations <strong>of</strong> rows.<br />

References<br />

Khokhar, A., Yousuf, A., Singh, M., Sharma, V., Sandhu, P.S., Chary, G.R. 2021. Impact <strong>of</strong><br />

land configuration and strip-intercropping on run<strong>of</strong>f, soil loss and crop yields under<br />

rainfed conditions in the Shivalik foot hills <strong>of</strong> North-West, India. Sustainability. 13,<br />

6282. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13116282.<br />

T2-14P-1073<br />

Influence <strong>of</strong> Crop Geometry and Plant Growth Regulators on Production<br />

Potential <strong>of</strong> Pigeon Pea (Cajanuscajan (L.) Millsp.)<br />

S.U. Pawar 1* , W.N. Narkhede 2 , B.V. Asewar 3 and Mirza Iab 4<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Agronomy,<br />

Vasantrao Naik Marathwada Krishi Vidyapeeth, Parbhani (M.S.) – 431402.<br />

*pawarsu7@rediffmail.com , agronomistsup@gmail.com<br />

Pigeonpea being highly branching and indeterminate growth habit responds very well to crop<br />

geometry. Hence to achieve potential yields, it is important to maintain optimum plant<br />

population which can effectively utilize available moisture, nutrients and solar radiation. The<br />

plant growth regulators are also known to enhance the source sink relationship and stimulate<br />

the translocation <strong>of</strong> photo assimilates, thereby increase the productivity. There is need for<br />

scientific manipulation by synchronizing plant growth through growth regulating chemicals,<br />

which can check the excessive vegetative growth, thereby creating proper balance between<br />

source and sink for enhanced crop yield and standardize the plant density to exploit yield<br />

potential. Considering these points the present investigation attempted to stabilize yield with<br />

the following objectives: the objectives: (i) To find out the effect <strong>of</strong> crop geometry on growth<br />

and yield <strong>of</strong> pigeon pea, (ii) To find out the effect <strong>of</strong> plant growth regulators on morpho<br />

physiological, yield components, productivity and seed quality <strong>of</strong> pigeonpea, and (iii) To find<br />

out effect <strong>of</strong> crop geometry and plant growth regulators on economics <strong>of</strong> pigeonpea.<br />

Methodology:<br />

The field experiments on pigeonpea (Var. BDN-711) were conducted at research farm <strong>of</strong><br />

Agronomy department, Vasantrao Naik Marathwada Krishi Vidyapeeth, Parbhani (MS)<br />

Ecosystem based approaches for climate change adaptation, ecosystem services, integrated farming system<br />

models, Land degradation neutrality<br />

175 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

during kharif season <strong>of</strong> 2018, 2019 and 2020. The field experiment was laid out in split plot<br />

design and replicated thrice. Treatment consisted <strong>of</strong> twenty treatment combinations<br />

comprising four crop geometry in main plot and five foliar applications <strong>of</strong> plant growth<br />

regulators in sub plot. Sowing was done on 26 th June 2018, 28 th June 2019 and 29 th June<br />

2020 during first, second and third year <strong>of</strong> experimentation, respectively. The recommended<br />

dose <strong>of</strong> NPK and plant protection schedule was followed. Periodical observations <strong>of</strong> growth<br />

and yield contributing characters <strong>of</strong> pigeonpea along with the yield data were recorded and<br />

statistically analyzed to evaluate the effect <strong>of</strong> different treatments. The fertility co-efficient<br />

<strong>of</strong> pigeonpea was arrived from relationship between the number <strong>of</strong> flowers produced per<br />

plant and the number<strong>of</strong> pods produced per plant and the results were expressed in terms <strong>of</strong><br />

percentage (Sumathi et al. 2016).<br />

Results:<br />

The data from tables revealed that, crop geometry and foliar application <strong>of</strong> plant growth<br />

regulators significantly influenced the growth, yield and economics <strong>of</strong> pigeonpea. Crop<br />

geometry <strong>of</strong> 120cmx20cm and 75-150cmx20cm recorded higher values <strong>of</strong> growth and yield<br />

parameters per plant, followed by crop geometry <strong>of</strong> 60-120cmx20cm.Maximum seed yield<br />

was recorded with the interaction <strong>of</strong> crop geometry 60-120cmx20cm (S3) with foliar<br />

application <strong>of</strong> Brassinosteroids @ 0.1 ppm which was at par with interaction <strong>of</strong> crop<br />

geometry 60-120cmx20cm with foliar application <strong>of</strong> NAA @ 40 ppm and interaction <strong>of</strong> crop<br />

geometry 90cmx20cm with foliar application <strong>of</strong> Brassinosteroids @ 0.1 ppm . These results<br />

agree with findings reported by Kashyap et al., (2002), Ramesh and Ramprasad (2013),<br />

Sumathi et al. (2016). The highest net realization was recorded with the interaction <strong>of</strong> crop<br />

geometry 60-120cmx20cm with foliar application <strong>of</strong> Brassinosteroids @ 0.1 ppm and<br />

interaction <strong>of</strong> crop geometry 90cmx20cm with foliar application <strong>of</strong> Brassinosteroids @ 0.1<br />

ppm, interaction <strong>of</strong> crop geometry 60-120cmx20cm with foliar application NAA @ 40 ppm<br />

and with interaction <strong>of</strong> crop geometry 90cmx20cm with foliar application <strong>of</strong> NAA @ 40<br />

ppm.<br />

Conclusion<br />

Based on the three years findings <strong>of</strong> present investigation, it is concluded that crop geometry<br />

<strong>of</strong> 60-120cmx20cm and 90cmx20cm for pigeonpea were found to be productive, pr<strong>of</strong>itable<br />

and remunerative as compared to crop geometries. While among the different plant growth<br />

regulators, foliar application <strong>of</strong> Brassinosteroids @ 0.1 ppm (02 sprays at bud initiation and<br />

flowering) was found to be beneficial in improving yield parameters, seed yield, net returns<br />

and also the fertility co-efficient <strong>of</strong> pigeonpea, as compared to other plant growth regulators.<br />

References<br />

176 | Page<br />

Ecosystem based approaches for climate change adaptation, ecosystem services, integrated farming system models,<br />

Land degradation neutrality


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Kashyap, T. L., Shrivastava, G. K., Lakpale, R. and Chaubey, N. K. 2002. Productivity<br />

potential <strong>of</strong> pigeonpea (Cajanuscajan L. Mill sp.) genotypes in response to growth<br />

regulators under Vertisols <strong>of</strong> Chhatisgarh plains. Ann. Agric. Res. 24(2): 449-452.<br />

Ramesh, R. and Ramprasad, E. 2013. Effect <strong>of</strong> Plant growth regulators on morphological,<br />

physiological and biochemical parameters <strong>of</strong> soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merrill.)<br />

Helix. 6:441-447.<br />

Sumathi, A., Babu Rajendra Prasad, V. and Mallika Vanangamudi. 2016. Influence <strong>of</strong> plant<br />

growth regulators on yield and yield components in pigeonpea. Legume Res. LR-<br />

3637 [1-7]<br />

Mean seed yield (kg ha -1 ) <strong>of</strong> pigeonpea as influenced by different treatments during<br />

2018, 2019, 2020 & pooled mean.<br />

Main Plot: Crop geometry<br />

Treatments Seed yield (kg ha -1 )<br />

2018 2019 2020 Pooled<br />

S 1: 90 cm X20cm 1466 1782 1480 1573<br />

S 2 :120 cm x20cm 1239 1572 1284 1365<br />

S 3: 60-120 cm x20cm 1661 1982 1546 1729<br />

S4: 75-150 cm x20cm 1281 1361 1313 1318<br />

S.E.(m)+ 57.52 72.37 39.6 50.9<br />

C.D. at 5% 199.02 254.74 137.1 176.0<br />

Sub Plot (Plant Growth regulators) (02 sprays at bud initiation and flowering)<br />

G 1: NAA @ 40 ppm 1630 1847 1537 1671<br />

G 2: Mepiquat chloride @ 50 g a.iha -1 1384 1596 1360 1447<br />

G 3: Brassinosteroids @ 0.1 % 1742 2018 1576 1778<br />

G 4: Chlormequat Chloride @ 75 g a.iha -1 1212 1583 1334 1376<br />

G 5: Control 1089 1328 1210 1209<br />

S.E.(m)+ 34.97 79.55 46.0 33.0<br />

C.D. at 5% 96.78 220.18 132.6 95.1<br />

S X F Interaction<br />

S.E.(m)+ 69.94 159.12 92.02 74.85<br />

C.D. at 5% 193.56 440.36 254.68 207.16<br />

General Mean 1412 1674 1403 1496<br />

Ecosystem based approaches for climate change adaptation, ecosystem services, integrated farming system<br />

models, Land degradation neutrality<br />

177 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

T2-15P-1112<br />

Yield and Biological Efficiencies <strong>of</strong> Millet-Based Intercropping Systems<br />

Under Dryland Conditions at Bastar Plateau Zone <strong>of</strong> Chhattisgarh<br />

Ashwani Kumar Thakur, Tejpal Chandrakar, Ashish Kumar Kerketta and<br />

G. Ravindrachary<br />

SG College <strong>of</strong> Agriculture and Research Station,Jagdalpur, Indira Gandhi Krishi Vishwavidyalaya<br />

(CG) India-494001<br />

agrosgcars@rediffmail.com<br />

Millet is one <strong>of</strong> the most popular food grain crops grown in almost all tribal belts <strong>of</strong><br />

Chattisgarh. It is extensively grown under both a sole and mixed cropping system through the<br />

broadcast method <strong>of</strong> sowing. In Bastar Plateau Zone, the area under small millets was 28.41<br />

thousand hectares, which was 39.73 percent <strong>of</strong> Chhattisgarh State (71.50 thousand hectares).<br />

While, the total production was 7.95 thousand tons which were37.06 percent <strong>of</strong> Chhattisgarh<br />

State's production <strong>of</strong> small millets <strong>of</strong> 21.45 thousand tons. The intercropping system <strong>of</strong><br />

cereals + pigeon pea/legumes were tested and found to be pr<strong>of</strong>itable system. Reason for the<br />

yield advantage in the intercropping system was because the component crops differed in the<br />

utilization <strong>of</strong> growth resources and converting them more efficiently resulting in a higher<br />

yield per unit area than that produced by the sole crops (Patil et al., 2010).This paper<br />

evaluated different millet based intercropping systems for their biological efficiency<br />

Methodology<br />

A field experiment was conducted during the Kharif season 2019 in the Entisols <strong>of</strong><br />

Instructional cum Research Farm, Lamker, S. G. College <strong>of</strong> Agriculture and Research<br />

Station, Kumhrawand, Jagdalpur, Chhattisgarh, India. During the cropping season total <strong>of</strong><br />

2033.00 mm rainfall was received with 78 rainy days. Available N was low available P was<br />

very low and available K was high in the experiment field with acidic reaction and bulk<br />

density was 1.35. The experiment consists <strong>of</strong> three replications with nine treatments that<br />

were laid out in a randomized complete block design (RCBD). The treatments are: T1: 1 st<br />

Base crop + intercrop (4:1), T 2: 1 st Base crop + intercrop (6:1), T 3: 1 st Base crop +<br />

intercrop (8:1), T4: 2 nd Base crop + intercrop (4:1), T5: 2 nd Base crop + intercrop (6:1),<br />

T 6: 2 nd Base crop + intercrop (8:1), T 7: Sole crop <strong>of</strong> 1 st Base crop, T 8: Sole crop <strong>of</strong> 2 nd<br />

Base crop, T 9: Sole crop <strong>of</strong> intercrop. Land equivalent ratio, Area time equivalent ratio,<br />

aggressivity, Relative Crowding Co-efficient , Harvest Index (%) and Millet Grain<br />

Equivalent Yield (MGEY kg ha -1 ) are computed with formula.<br />

178 | Page<br />

Ecosystem based approaches for climate change adaptation, ecosystem services, integrated farming system models,<br />

Land degradation neutrality


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Results<br />

The study reveals that grain yield, straw yield, and test weight are influenced significantly<br />

due to different treatments. In base crop treatment, sole kodo millet (T 7) recorded<br />

significantly higher grain, straw, and test weight among all the treatments but it was observed<br />

at par with kodo millet + pgeonpea 8:1 ratio (T3), kodo millet + pigeonpea 6:1 ratio (T2) and<br />

kodomillet + pigeonpea 4:1 ratio (T 1) in straw yield and test weight. Harvest index was<br />

recorded as not significant effect due to different treatments but numerically highest HI was<br />

observed in sole barnyard millet (T 8) among all treatments. Similar results were reported by<br />

Kuriet al. (2012). The highest LER was recorded in the treatment kodo millet + pigeonpea<br />

4:1 ratio (T1) which was found on par with kodo millet + pigeonpea 6:1 ratio (T2), kodo<br />

millet + pigeonpea 8:1 ratio (T 3) and barnyard millet + pigeonpea 8:1 ratio (T 6).<br />

Conclusion<br />

Land equivalent ratio and relative crowding co-efficient were produced highest in sole<br />

Kodomillet. Aggressively was recorded higher positive sign in Kodo+ pigeon pea 8:1 row<br />

ratio in base crop and intercrop; Kodomillet + pigeonpea 4:1 row ratio produced higher<br />

positive aggressivity, area time equivalent ratio and millet grain equivalent ratio.<br />

References:<br />

Keerthanapriya, S., Hemalatha, M., Joseph, M. and Prabina, B.J. 2019. Assessment <strong>of</strong><br />

competitiveness and yield advantages <strong>of</strong> little millet based intercropping system<br />

under rainfed condition. Int. J. Chem. Stud. 7(3): 4121-4124.<br />

Kuri, B. R., Yadav, R. S. and Kumawat, A. 2012. Evaluation <strong>of</strong> pear lmillet<br />

(Pennisetumglaucum) and moth bean (Vigna acconitifolia) intercropping systems in<br />

hyper arid partially irrigated north-western plains zone. Ind. J. Agric. Sci. 82(11):<br />

993-996.<br />

Patil, N. B., Halikatti, S. I., Sujay, Y.H., Kumar, P. Sanjay, B. H., Topagi, C. and Pushpa,<br />

V. 2010. Influence <strong>of</strong> intercropping on the growth and yield <strong>of</strong> little millet and<br />

pigeonpea. Int. J. Agric. Sci. 6(2): 602-604.<br />

Triveni, U., Sandhya Rani, Y., Patro, T. S. S. K., Anuradha, N. and Divya, M. 2017.<br />

Evaluation <strong>of</strong> different finger millet based intercropping systems in the north<br />

coastal zone <strong>of</strong> Andhra Pradesh. Int. J. Cosmet. Sci. (5), pp.828-831.<br />

Ecosystem based approaches for climate change adaptation, ecosystem services, integrated farming system<br />

models, Land degradation neutrality<br />

179 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Effect <strong>of</strong> different treatments on the Biological Efficiency <strong>of</strong> Intercropping System<br />

Treatment<br />

LER<br />

LEC<br />

CV % 6.06 6.89 6.79 11.64 9.16<br />

Treat descriptions are given in methodology section.<br />

T2-16P-1117<br />

Effect <strong>of</strong> Mechanization Practices on Economics <strong>of</strong> Soyabean-Safflower<br />

Cropping System<br />

S.A. Shinde*, P.O. Bhutada and S.B.Ghuge<br />

All India Coordinate Research Project on Safflower,<br />

Vasantrao Naik Marathwada Krishi Vidyapeeth Parbhani, Maharashtra, India.<br />

*santoshashinde338@gmail.com<br />

Oilseed crops are the second most important determinant <strong>of</strong> agricultural economy, next only<br />

to cereals within the segment <strong>of</strong> field crops. Among oilseed Safflower<br />

(CarthamustinctoriusL.) is an important oilseed crop with 35-40 % oil. It has been used as a<br />

source <strong>of</strong> edible oil and dying since ancient time. Effective use <strong>of</strong> agriculture machinery<br />

helps to increase productivity and production <strong>of</strong> output, undertake timely farm operations.<br />

This judicious use <strong>of</strong> time, labour and resources facilitates sustainable intensification and<br />

timely. Planting <strong>of</strong> crops, leading to an increase in productivity. Hence Mechanical power has<br />

become more economical and indispensable to meet targets <strong>of</strong> timeliness and efficient<br />

utilization <strong>of</strong> natural resources and inputs (Srinivasaraoet al., 2013) Mechanization in<br />

safflower crop will help to timely field operation and easy for harvesting and save huge cost<br />

<strong>of</strong> cultivation and sort the labour problem <strong>of</strong> farmer. This study is therefore carried out to<br />

determine suitable mechanization practice in safflower.<br />

Biological Efficiency<br />

Relative Crowding Co-efficient<br />

Ks Ki Ki ×Ks=K<br />

T1 1.75 0.76 0.84 1.59 1.23<br />

T2 1.71 0.73 0.78 0.78 0.57<br />

T3 1.65 0.68 1.04 0.29 0.29<br />

T4 1.53 0.59 0.53 0.58 0.32<br />

T5 1.60 0.64 0.81 0.36 0.3<br />

T6 1.61 0.67 0.86 0.28 0.23<br />

T7 1.00 1.00 0.00 - 0.00<br />

T8 1.00 1.00 0.00 - 0.00<br />

T9 1.00 1.00 - 0.00 0.00<br />

SEm± 0.05 0.03 0.02 0.04 0.02<br />

CD at 5% 0.15 0.10 0.07 0.13 0.05<br />

180 | Page<br />

Ecosystem based approaches for climate change adaptation, ecosystem services, integrated farming system models,<br />

Land degradation neutrality


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Methodology<br />

A field experiment was conducted during the period <strong>of</strong> 2020-21 at All India coordinated<br />

Research Project on Safflower, V.N.M.K.V., Parbhani. The soil was clayey in texture, low in<br />

available nitrogen (231 kg ha-1), low in available phosphorus (12.64 kg ha-1), rich in<br />

available potash (474 kg ha-1), sulphur (15.25 kg ha-1) and slightly alkaline in reaction. The<br />

soil was moderately alkaline in reaction (8.13 pH). In general, weather conditions were<br />

favourable for plant growth and no severe pest and diseases noticed during experimentation.<br />

The study involved two treatment combinations two factors viz., Selective mechanization<br />

plot (SMP) and Farmer practice (FP) with two treatments. Each experimental unit was non<br />

replicated having Plot size 1000 m2 each <strong>of</strong> mechanical and normal plots. Sowing was<br />

completed as per treatments. Safflower variety PBNS -86 was sown at spacing <strong>of</strong> 45 cm<br />

(between rows) X 20 cm (between Plants) The fertilizer dose <strong>of</strong> 60:40:00 NPK kg ha-1 was<br />

applied at the time <strong>of</strong> sowing. The package <strong>of</strong> recommended practices were adopted. The data<br />

on growth and yield parameters were analysed with paired ‘t’ test and cost <strong>of</strong> cultivation, net<br />

returns, B:C ratio were worked out. Data on time period for each operation, energy used<br />

were converted into suitable energy units and expressed in MJ/ha. Energy equivalents <strong>of</strong><br />

inputs and outputs were computed based on values suggested by Gopalanet al. (1978) The<br />

calculation <strong>of</strong> energy input and output equivalents, the indices <strong>of</strong> energy ratio (energy use<br />

efficiency), energy productivity and net energy were calculated as per (Rafieeet al., 2010) .<br />

Following parameter selected under selective mechanization vis-à-vis Farmers practice in<br />

terms <strong>of</strong> yield, economics and energy budgeting <strong>of</strong> Safflower<br />

S.No Name <strong>of</strong> field operation Mechanized condition Farmer's practice<br />

1 Sowing With Seed cum<br />

Fertilizer Drill<br />

Behind the bullock<br />

drawn plough<br />

2 Inter cultivation Power weeder Bullock drawn Danthi<br />

3 Plant protection Motorized/ power<br />

sprayers<br />

4 Harvesting, threshing and winnowing Combiner with minute<br />

modification<br />

Knapsack sprayer<br />

Manual<br />

Results<br />

Safflower seed yield (1485 kg/ha) which was higher than farmer practice (1251 kg/ha). Seed<br />

yield <strong>of</strong> safflower was increased by 18.70% observed under mechanized condition compared<br />

to farmers practice similar result recorded by Mandal (1975). Similarly Singh and Singh<br />

(1975) concluded that tractor farms gave higher yields <strong>of</strong> wheat, paddy and sugarcane and<br />

produced a higher overall gross output per hectare than non-tractor farms. Proper plant to<br />

plant population and optimum management practice can be adopted under mechanization<br />

Ecosystem based approaches for climate change adaptation, ecosystem services, integrated farming system<br />

models, Land degradation neutrality<br />

181 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

than farmer practice which helps to increase or record good growth <strong>of</strong> crop than famer<br />

practice. Further, the cost <strong>of</strong> cultivation incurred for normal method <strong>of</strong> cultivation was higher<br />

(53921) compared to mechanized safflower cultivation (45101) leading to higher net returns<br />

(100699) and B:C ratio (3.20) in mechanized plot Comparing the yield and economics <strong>of</strong><br />

cultivation methods, mechanized plot reduced the labour requirement, time <strong>of</strong> operation and<br />

cultivation cost in turn resulted higher benefits.<br />

The energy use efficiency in mechanized plot (0.56kg/MJ) was higher than normal plot (0.27<br />

kg/MJ). This lead to saving <strong>of</strong> 17 labour / ha and saved 35hrs time period/ha through<br />

selective mechanization <strong>of</strong> important operations. The results were in agreement with the<br />

findings <strong>of</strong> SaeedFirouzi and HashemAminpanah (2012) who reported that Energy output –<br />

input ratio, specific energy, energy productivity, and net energy gain computed were 3.93,<br />

4.74 MJ/kg, in semi-mechanized groundnut production.<br />

Safflower yield, system economics under mechanized cultivation vs farmer's practice<br />

Treatments<br />

Mechanized<br />

conditions<br />

Farmer's<br />

practice<br />

References<br />

Seed yield<br />

(kg/ha)<br />

Biological yield<br />

(kg/ha)<br />

Gross<br />

returns<br />

(Rs/ha)<br />

System economics<br />

Cost <strong>of</strong> Net<br />

cultivation returns<br />

(Rs/ha) (Rs/ha)<br />

B:C<br />

ratio<br />

Soybean Safflower Soybean Safflower<br />

1755 1485 4920 4725 145800 45101 100699 3.2<br />

1571 1251 4400 3865 126990 53921 73069 2.4<br />

Anonymous. 2015. All India Coordinated Research Project on Castor. Annual Report. ICAR-<br />

Indian Institute <strong>of</strong> oilseeds Research Hyderabad-500030<br />

Gopalan, C.B., Ramasastri, V. and Balasubramanian, S.C. 1978. Nutritive value <strong>of</strong> Indian<br />

foods (Hyderbad: National Institute<strong>of</strong> Nutrition)<br />

Mandal, G.C. and Prasad R.N. 1975. Economics <strong>of</strong> Tractor Cultivation-A study <strong>of</strong> the district<br />

<strong>of</strong> Shahabad, Bihar. Shanti Niketan, Agro-Economic Research Centre, VisvaBharati.<br />

Rafiee, S., Mousavi Avval, S. H. and Mohammadi, A. 2010. Modelling and sensitivity<br />

analysis <strong>of</strong> energy inputs for apple production in Iran. Energy, 35:3301-3306<br />

Singh, L.R. and Singh, R.V. 1975. Impact <strong>of</strong> Farm Mechanization on Human and Bullock<br />

Labour Use in Two Regions <strong>of</strong> U.P. Dept <strong>of</strong> Agri. Economics. G.B. Pant Univ. <strong>of</strong><br />

Agril.and Technology.<br />

Saeed, Firouzi and Hashem, Aminpanah.2012. Energy use efficiency for groundnut (Arachis<br />

182 | Page<br />

Ecosystem based approaches for climate change adaptation, ecosystem services, integrated farming system models,<br />

Land degradation neutrality


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

hypogaea L-) production in a semi-mechanized cultivation system. Annals <strong>of</strong> Biological<br />

Reseah, 3(8):3994-3997<br />

Srinivasrao, Ch., Sreenath, Dixit., Srinivas, I, Sanjeeva Reddy, B., Adake, R. V. and Shailesh<br />

Borkar. 2013. Operationalization <strong>of</strong> Custom Hiring Centres on Farm Implements in<br />

Hundred Villages in India. Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture,<br />

Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh 151.<br />

T2-17P-1232<br />

Performance and Adaptability <strong>of</strong> Different Improved Variety <strong>of</strong> Backyard<br />

Poultry in Garhwa District <strong>of</strong> Jharkhand<br />

Sushma Lalita Baxla 1 , Ashok Kumar 2 and Sudhir Kumar Jha 3<br />

1,2<br />

Krishi Vigyan Kendra Garhwa, Birsa Agricultural University, Ranchi-834006 Jharkhand,<br />

India<br />

3<br />

Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Palamu,Birsa Agricultural University, Ranchi-834006 Jharkhand,<br />

India<br />

Backyard poultry farming is an age-old traditional practice in rural India. It comprises rearing<br />

<strong>of</strong> indigenous birds with poor production performance in terms <strong>of</strong> egg and meat. It plays a<br />

pivotal role in supplementary income generation and nutrition security to the rural poor<br />

(Choudhary et al., 2019, Kiskuetal., 2019). Generally in backyard poultry farming, farmer<br />

rears 5-10 indigenous desi birds which produce 50-60 eggs per year and low meat production<br />

(Shekhar et al., 2020). Jharkhand is tribal dominated state where backyard poultry is one <strong>of</strong><br />

the main source <strong>of</strong> livelihood for tribal and other low income farmers. Garhwa is also having<br />

tribal and low-income group <strong>of</strong> scheduled caste as well as other backyard class <strong>of</strong> farmers<br />

who rear backyard poultry for their livelihood but due to lack <strong>of</strong> knowledge about improved<br />

breed and management practices, the productivity performance was very poor. There is<br />

constant demand for poultry meat and eggs in rural as well as urban areas <strong>of</strong> Garhwa district.<br />

Divyayan Red and Jharsim, an improved variety <strong>of</strong> dual purpose, multi colored plumage,<br />

better production potential, disease resistance and good scavenging behaviour poultry<br />

developed by Birsa Agricultural University, Ranchi, Jharkhand and Divyayan Krishi Vigyan<br />

Kendra, Ranchi, Jharkhand, respectively were taken as treatments in the present trial. The<br />

experiment was conducted at seven farmers field in two villages – Sangbariya and Tenar <strong>of</strong><br />

Meral block <strong>of</strong> Garhwa district under NICRA project. The productivity and pr<strong>of</strong>itability <strong>of</strong><br />

existing backyard poultry farming is very low. Considering these factors, an On Farm Trial<br />

was conducted to assess the performance <strong>of</strong> different improved variety <strong>of</strong> backyard poultry<br />

under free scavenging backyard system in Garhwa district <strong>of</strong> Jharkhand India<br />

Ecosystem based approaches for climate change adaptation, ecosystem services, integrated farming system<br />

models, Land degradation neutrality<br />

183 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Methodology<br />

An On Farm Trial was conducted at seven farmers field with three treatments <strong>of</strong> poultry in two<br />

villages – Sangbariya and Tenar <strong>of</strong> Garhwa district during the period <strong>of</strong> 2020 - 22. The<br />

treatmentswere : T1-Farmers Practice (rearing <strong>of</strong> non-descript desi poultry bird), T2 - Divyayan<br />

Red and T3 - Jharsim. Each treatment with 20 birds (15 days old) in 1:1 ratio <strong>of</strong> male and female<br />

were given to farmers.The birds were let loose in the backyard where there was provision <strong>of</strong> free<br />

scavenging during day and shelter at night. The experimental data <strong>of</strong> body weight gain, mortality<br />

rate, egg and meat productivity and economic parameters were taken as per standard norms.<br />

Results<br />

The highest egg productivity and B:C ratio were realized in Divyayan Red as compared to desi<br />

birds, whereas the Diyayan Red and Jharshim were at par with respect to body weight i.e 1.82<br />

and 1.90 kg and net return was 1912 and 1653 respectively but were significantly superior to<br />

desi-non descript breed .Mortality rate <strong>of</strong> 3.1 was also low in Divyayan Red followed by<br />

Jharsimi.e 4.3 as compared to non-descript desi birds which was quite higher i.e. 8.2.The net<br />

income <strong>of</strong> small, marginal and landless poultry farmers was increased due to rearing <strong>of</strong> Divyayan<br />

Red and Jharsim.<br />

Conclusion<br />

The study was concluded that improved variety <strong>of</strong> poultry likeDivyayan Red and Jharsim rearing<br />

under backyard system could serve as an outstanding dual purpose in Garhwa district <strong>of</strong><br />

Jharkhand, due toits ability for faster growth, better weight gain, faster sexual maturity, low<br />

mortality, better egg production and good adaptability nature. The net income <strong>of</strong> farmers was also<br />

increased due to rearing <strong>of</strong> these improved variety <strong>of</strong> poultry under low input and high output<br />

pursuit within a very short span <strong>of</strong> timeand has better acceptability in poultry farming community<br />

and better adaptability to agro- climatic conditions in Garhwa district <strong>of</strong> Jharkhand.<br />

Assessment <strong>of</strong> Performance <strong>of</strong> Divyayan Red and Jharsim Poultry in Backyard System (<br />

n=20)<br />

Treatment<br />

Av. Body wt.<br />

at 15-day old<br />

chicks<br />

(Kg/bird)<br />

Av. Age<br />

<strong>of</strong> sexual<br />

maturity<br />

(Days)<br />

Av. Body<br />

wt. <strong>of</strong> male<br />

& female at<br />

40 weeks <strong>of</strong><br />

age<br />

(Kg/bird)<br />

Av. Egg<br />

production/<br />

bird/at 72<br />

weeks<br />

(Nos)<br />

Mortality<br />

Rate (%)<br />

Gross<br />

Return (Rs/<br />

bird/annum)<br />

Net return<br />

(Rs/bird/annum)<br />

T1: Farmers 0.096 195.25 1.32 75.21 8.2 1341 1091 2.31<br />

Practice :<br />

Non- descript<br />

Poultry<br />

T2: Divyayan 0.135 174.27 1.82 165.29 3.1 2377 1912 5.19<br />

Red Poultry<br />

T3: Jharsim 0.140 172.30 1.90 140.35 4.3 2123 1653 4.60<br />

Poultry<br />

SEm (0.05) 15.3 18.4 0.139 7.43 0.875 144 138<br />

CD % 32.6 20.8 0.38 18.4 2.26 292 270<br />

Note : Egg Rs. 12/egg Poultry meat - 350/Kg<br />

B:C<br />

Ratio<br />

184 | Page<br />

Ecosystem based approaches for climate change adaptation, ecosystem services, integrated farming system models,<br />

Land degradation neutrality


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

References<br />

Kisku, J., Oraon, J., Pandey, A.K., Singh, B.K. and Chandraker, K. 2019. Study <strong>of</strong> Adoption<br />

Level and Constraints Faced by Rural Women in Backyard Poultry Farming. J.<br />

Agri. Search. 6 (special ): 101-103.<br />

Choudhary, R.K., Roy, M.K., and Sohan, R.K., 2019. Livelihood upliftment <strong>of</strong> Tribal<br />

Farmers through Backyard Poultry Farming Intervention in Kishanganj district <strong>of</strong><br />

Bihar.J. Agri.Search. 6, (Special): 90-92.<br />

Shekhar, S., Sanjay Kumar, and Rajni Kumari. 2020. Comparative Performance <strong>of</strong> Divyayan<br />

Red and Local Desi birds under Backyard Farming in Koderma District <strong>of</strong><br />

Jharkhand India. J. Agri. Search, 7,2: 93-96.<br />

T2-18P-1251<br />

Challenges in Contemporary Indian agriculture: Integrated Farming<br />

Systems (IFS) for Transformation<br />

Marneni Divya Sree * , M. J. Mercykutty and Rose Mathews<br />

College <strong>of</strong> Agriculture, Kerala Agricultural University, Vellanikkara, Thrissur, Kerala, India-<br />

680656.<br />

*marnenidivyasree@gmail.com<br />

The green revolution in the 1960s was characterized by the cultivation <strong>of</strong> high-yielding<br />

varieties and the application <strong>of</strong> more intensive farming techniques, which transformed the<br />

agricultural landscape in the developing world. After the green revolution, cereal crop<br />

production in India increased dramatically. India is the world's second-largest wheat and rice<br />

producer, with 100.42 Million Tonnes and 112.44 Million Tonnes <strong>of</strong> production respectively<br />

in 2020-21 (GoI, 2021). However, its non-sustainable nature coupled with limited scope and<br />

subsequent impacts on the ecosystem has led to a quest for a more sustainable and greener<br />

alternative. With this backdrop, the objectives are framed as 1. To identify the challenges <strong>of</strong><br />

contemporary Indian agriculture. 2. To identify the scope and importance <strong>of</strong> Integrated<br />

farming systems in India<br />

Methodology<br />

Data regarding stunted and wasted children was taken from UNICEF, 2019. The data<br />

regarding the average size <strong>of</strong> landholding and no. <strong>of</strong> holdings across all size groups was taken<br />

from GoI, 2016.<br />

Ecosystem based approaches for climate change adaptation, ecosystem services, integrated farming system<br />

models, Land degradation neutrality<br />

185 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Results<br />

To identify the challenges <strong>of</strong> contemporary Indian agriculture<br />

Though India has achieved self-sufficiency in food production, there area few challenges in<br />

the contemporary scenario like the sustainability <strong>of</strong> agricultural production systems and<br />

national food security. Impacts <strong>of</strong> climate change and soil degradation in the recent past. The<br />

increasing awareness <strong>of</strong> nutrition leading to dietary diversification is demanding widespread<br />

changes in cropping patterns. The shortage <strong>of</strong> regular access to sufficient, safe, and nutritious<br />

food, resulted in hunger and malnutrition. It is reported that during 2016-2018, around 31 per<br />

cent <strong>of</strong> the world’s stunted and 51 per cent <strong>of</strong> wasted children were in India (UNICEF,<br />

2019). The average size <strong>of</strong> land holding has come down from 2.28 ha. in 1970-71 to 1.08 ha.<br />

in 2015-16 (Fig) (GoI, 2016). This declining trend in the size <strong>of</strong> land holding and increasing<br />

no. <strong>of</strong> marginal and smallholder farmers poses a serious challenge to the sustainability and<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>itability <strong>of</strong> farming. This situation calls for an integrated effort to address the emerging<br />

livelihood issues.<br />

Figure 1<br />

2.5<br />

2<br />

1.5<br />

1<br />

0.5<br />

0<br />

1970-71 1980-81 1990-91 2000-01 2010-11 2015-16<br />

Average size <strong>of</strong> landholding (in hectares)<br />

To identify the scope and importance <strong>of</strong> Integrated farming systems in India<br />

There is a possibility for our food system to provide everyone with enough food for a healthy<br />

life, while maintaining a healthy environment, with the sustainable intensification <strong>of</strong><br />

agriculture, collaborative, and inclusive policymaking. For sustainable intensification <strong>of</strong><br />

agriculture Integrated farming system is the leading pathway. The adoption <strong>of</strong> different<br />

farming systems is considered the most powerful tool for enhancing the pr<strong>of</strong>itability <strong>of</strong> small<br />

and marginal farmers, with considerable scope for resource recycling and the concept <strong>of</strong><br />

ecological soundness leading to sustainable agriculture (FAO, 2022).<br />

The farming system approach is not only a reliable way <strong>of</strong> obtaining fairly high productivity<br />

with considerable scope for resource recycling but also a concept <strong>of</strong> ecological soundness<br />

leading to sustainable agriculture. With the increasing energy crisis due to the shrinking <strong>of</strong><br />

186 | Page<br />

Ecosystem based approaches for climate change adaptation, ecosystem services, integrated farming system models,<br />

Land degradation neutrality


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

non-renewable fossil-fuel-based sources, the fertilizer nutrient cost has been increasing<br />

steeply. This would leave the farmers with no option but to fully explore the potential<br />

alternate sources <strong>of</strong> nutrients for individual crops and in the cropping systems.<br />

Conclusion<br />

It can be concluded that in diversified farming, the thrust is mainly to minimize the risk,<br />

while in such situations a judicious mix <strong>of</strong> one or more enterprises along with cropping, there<br />

exist a complimentary effect through effective recycling <strong>of</strong> wastes and crop residues which<br />

encompasses an additional source <strong>of</strong> income to the farmer.<br />

References<br />

FAO [Food and Agriculture Organization]. 2022. Indian agriculture towards 2030. Rome,<br />

322p.<br />

GOI [Government <strong>of</strong> India]. 2016. All India report on Agriculture Census. Ministry <strong>of</strong><br />

Agriculture and Farmers Welfare, New Delhi, 26p.<br />

GOI [Government <strong>of</strong> India]. 2021. Agricultural statistics at a glance. Ministry <strong>of</strong> Agriculture<br />

and Farmers Welfare, New Delhi, 142p.<br />

UNICEF [United Nations International Children’s Emergency Fund]. 2019. The state <strong>of</strong> the<br />

world’s children 2019, Children, food, and nutrition: growing well in a changing<br />

world. New York, 39p.<br />

Ecosystem based approaches for climate change adaptation, ecosystem services, integrated farming system<br />

models, Land degradation neutrality<br />

T2-19P-1268<br />

Productivity and Pr<strong>of</strong>itability <strong>of</strong> Different Rabi Crops in Maize Based<br />

Cropping Systems under Rainfed Subtropics <strong>of</strong> Jammu<br />

Rohit Shrama 1* , A.P. Singh 1 , G. Ravindrachary 2 , K.A. Gopinath 2 , Jai Kumar 1 , Brinder<br />

Singh 1 , and Sunny Raina 1<br />

1 All India Coordinated Project for Dryland agriculture, Rakh-Dhiansar, Samba (UT <strong>of</strong> J & K)<br />

Sher-e-Kashmir University <strong>of</strong> Agricultural Sciences and Technology <strong>of</strong> Jammu, RakhDhiansar,<br />

Jammu, Jammu and Kashmir (UT) 181 133<br />

2 ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad,<br />

* rohit_agros@rediffmail.com<br />

Globally maize is grown on an area <strong>of</strong> about 197.19 million hectares with production <strong>of</strong><br />

1125.03 million tones and the average productivity is 5.71 tha -1 . In India, it is cultivated on an<br />

area <strong>of</strong> 9.21 million hectare with production <strong>of</strong> 25.13 million tones and productivity <strong>of</strong> 2.63<br />

tha -1 (Anonymous, 2020). In J&K Union Territory, maize is grown on an area <strong>of</strong><br />

about262.35thousand hectares with a production <strong>of</strong> 5744thousand tones and productivity <strong>of</strong>2.12 t<br />

ha -1 (Anonymous, 2019). Agriculture in Jammu and Kashmir is characterized by marginal and<br />

187 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

small farm holdings with average operational land holding size <strong>of</strong> 0.7 ha which is further<br />

dwindling owing to fragmentation because <strong>of</strong> expanding family size and diversion <strong>of</strong> agricultural<br />

land to other uses. The predominant rainfed cropping system in the region is maize-wheat and<br />

being cereal-cereal system, it is threatening the soil fertility and yield sustainability apart from<br />

adversely affecting the economic returns. Growing <strong>of</strong> large number <strong>of</strong> crops is practiced in<br />

rainfed lands to reduce the risk factor <strong>of</strong> crop failures due to drought or irregular rains. Moreover,<br />

diversification <strong>of</strong> crops can s<strong>of</strong>ten impacts on environmental resources and is considered to be<br />

more remunerative, better input use efficient and less risk prone. Growing <strong>of</strong> different rabi crops<br />

in maize-based cropping system can maintain soil fertility and sustain crop productivity.<br />

Methodology<br />

A field experiment was carried out at research farm <strong>of</strong> Advanced Centre for rainfed agriculture,<br />

Rakh Dhiansar, Sher-e-Kashmir University <strong>of</strong> Agricultural Sciences and Technology <strong>of</strong> Jammu<br />

during 2020-21.An experiment comprises <strong>of</strong> nine maize based cropping systems viz: Maize-<br />

Wheat, Maize- Chickpea, Maize- Lentil, Maize- Gobhisarson, Maize- Linseed, Maize-Barley,<br />

Maize-Taramira, Maize-Oat, Maize-Field pea were tested in randomized block design under<br />

sandy loam soil having slightly acidic in nature, well drained low in carbon, (0.22), low in<br />

available nitrogen (162 kgha -1 ) and potassium (102 kgha -1 ) and medium in available phosphorous<br />

(14.4 kg ha -1 ). All the crops in different cropping systems were raised in accordance with the<br />

recommended package <strong>of</strong> practices and technical programme.<br />

Results<br />

Evaluation <strong>of</strong> different maize-based cropping systems during rabi 2020-21under rainfed<br />

conditions.<br />

Treatment<br />

Grain<br />

yield (kg<br />

ha -1 )<br />

WEY<br />

(kg ha -1 )<br />

COC<br />

(Rs ha -1 )<br />

Net<br />

Returns<br />

(Rs. ha -1 )<br />

B:C<br />

Ratio<br />

RWUE<br />

(kg ha -1 -<br />

mm)<br />

T1 Maize-Wheat 2618 2618 23200 44528 2.92 23.42<br />

T2 Maize- Chickpea 668 2029 18800 21280 2.13 18.15<br />

T3 Maize- Lentil 740 1896 16700 20740 2.24 16.96<br />

T4 Maize-Gobhisarson 1003 2362 17000 29640 2.74 21.12<br />

T5 Maize- Linseed 587 1783 16200 19020 2.17 15.95<br />

T6 Maize-Barley 2490 2143 22000 20330 1.92 19.17<br />

T7 Maize-Taramira 602 1676 16000 17110 2.07 15.00<br />

T8 Maize-Oat 28500 1587 15800 15550 1.98 14.20<br />

T9 Maize-Field pea 710 2157 18600 24000 2.29 19.29<br />

CD (5%) - 228.7 - - - -<br />

Among the different crops sown under different cropping systems during rabi 2020-21,<br />

wheat crop reported significantly highest wheat equivalent yield to the tune <strong>of</strong> 2618 kgha -1<br />

188 | Page<br />

Ecosystem based approaches for climate change adaptation, ecosystem services, integrated farming system models,<br />

Land degradation neutrality


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

under maize-wheat cropping system with the corresponding highest values <strong>of</strong> net returns, B:C<br />

ratio and RWUE <strong>of</strong> Rs. 44528ha -1 , 2.92, and 23.43 kgha -1 -mm, which was found statistically<br />

at par with Gobhisarson having yield <strong>of</strong> 2362kgha -1 with the corresponding values <strong>of</strong> net<br />

returns, B:C ratio and RWUE <strong>of</strong> Rs. 29640ha -1 , 2.74, and 21.12 kgha -1 -mm, respectively<br />

under maize-gobhisarson cropping system. While the lowest wheat equivalent yield <strong>of</strong> 1587<br />

kgha -1 was registered in oats (fodder) under maize-oats (fodder) system with net returns, B:C<br />

ratio and RWUE <strong>of</strong> Rs. 15550ha -1 , 1.98, and 14.20 kgha -1 -mm, respectively. Tripathi et al.,<br />

1998 reported similar findings <strong>of</strong> MEY in maize-based cropping sequence.<br />

Conclusion<br />

Based on one year preliminarily observation, it may be concluded that maize wheat system<br />

was found to be superior among the other systems in terms <strong>of</strong> equivalent yield, net returns,<br />

B:C ratio and rain water use efficiency under rainfed conditions <strong>of</strong> Jammu.<br />

References<br />

Anonymous, 2019. Digest <strong>of</strong> Statistics 2018-19. Government <strong>of</strong> Jammu and Kashmir, finance<br />

department, directorate <strong>of</strong> economics and statistics. Available at:<br />

http://ecostatjk.nic.in/digeststat/DOS-2018-19-Final. Accessed on 19 June, 2022.<br />

Anonymous, 2020. World agricultural production, United States department <strong>of</strong> agriculture. Available<br />

at: https://apps.fas.usda.gov/psdonline/circulars/production.<br />

Jamwal J S. 2000. Production potential and economics <strong>of</strong> different crop sequence in rainfed areas <strong>of</strong><br />

Jammu. Ind. J. Agrn. 45 (2): 269-273.<br />

Tripathi S C, Chauhan D S, Sharma R K, Dhillon O P. 1998. Productivity and economics <strong>of</strong> different<br />

wheat (Triticum aectivum) based cropping sequence. Ind. J. Agrn. 44(2): 237-241.<br />

T2-20P-1278<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>itability <strong>of</strong> Rajmah based Intercropping System under Rainfed Upland<br />

Situation <strong>of</strong> Assam<br />

Nikhilesh Baruah, Nupur Kalita, Pallab Kumar Sarma, Bikram Borkotoki, Arunjyoti<br />

Sonowal, Rekhashree Kalita, and G. Ravindrachary<br />

AICRP on Dryland Agriculture Biswanath College <strong>of</strong> Agriculture, Assam Agricultural<br />

University, Biswanath Chariali, Assam-784176, India<br />

Rajmah (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) is one <strong>of</strong> the most important pulse crops grown all over the<br />

country. In Assam, it is an important prospective and pr<strong>of</strong>it-earning rabi crops more<br />

particularly in Borak valley Zone <strong>of</strong> Assam. Due to presence <strong>of</strong> high amount <strong>of</strong> nutrients, it<br />

is called as “king <strong>of</strong> nutrition”. It is grown for seed as well as green vegetable due to good<br />

sources <strong>of</strong> vitamins and minerals. Generally, most <strong>of</strong> the pulse crops including rajmah are<br />

grown as a mono crop in the farmer’s field. There is scope for intercropping in rajmah which<br />

Ecosystem based approaches for climate change adaptation, ecosystem services, integrated farming system<br />

models, Land degradation neutrality<br />

189 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

may lead to higher pr<strong>of</strong>it, may act as crop insurance against adverse weather conditions,<br />

meeting the diversification <strong>of</strong> crops and maximizing land use efficiency through efficient use<br />

<strong>of</strong> resources like moisture, nutrients and light, stabilizing the yield through risk minimization<br />

<strong>of</strong> crop failure and reduced pest and disease problems. (Coll et al., 2012), Therefore<br />

Intercropping <strong>of</strong> rajmah with other crops may be additional advantage for the farmers under<br />

rainfed situations. Considering the fact, the rajmah based intercropping with four rabi crops<br />

(toria, linseed, lentil and buckwheat) was undertaken for evaluation at AICRP for Dryland<br />

Agriculture, BN College <strong>of</strong> Agriculture, AAU, Biswanath Chariali, Assam for three years<br />

starting from rabi season <strong>of</strong> 2018-19 to 2020-21.<br />

Methodology<br />

The field experiment was conducted at the experimental field <strong>of</strong> All India Coordinated<br />

Research Project for Dryland Agriculture, Biswanath College <strong>of</strong> Agriculture, Biswanath<br />

Chariali, Assam Agricultural University, during the rabi season <strong>of</strong> 2018-19, 2019-20 and<br />

2020-21 in randomized block design. The texture <strong>of</strong> the soil <strong>of</strong> the experimental field was<br />

sandy loam with a pH <strong>of</strong> 4.98 and organic carbon <strong>of</strong> 0.58%. The soil was medium in<br />

available nitrogen (330.10 Kg ha -1 ), available phosphorus (23.26 Kg ha -1 ), and available<br />

potassium (171.35 Kg ha -1 ). The rajmah based intercropping was evaluated in a randomized<br />

block design with 13 treatment combinations involving three (3) replication. The treatments<br />

consisted <strong>of</strong> T 1 - Rajmah Sole, T 2 - Toria Sole, T 3 – Linseed Sole, T 4 – Lentil sole, T 5 –<br />

Buckwheat sole, T6- Rajmah + Toria (1:1), T7 -Rajmah + linseed (1:1), T8 - Rajmah + lentil<br />

(1:1), T 9- Rajmah + buckwheat (1:1),T 10-Rajmah + toria (2:1), T 11- Rajmah+ linseed (2:1),<br />

T12 -Rajmah + lentil(2:1) and T13 - Rajmah + buckwheat (2:1). The individual plot size was 20<br />

m 2 (5m x 4m) and the variety selected for rajmah was ‘Arun’, TS-38 for toria, T-397 for<br />

linseed, KLS-218 for lentil, and local variety for buckwheat. The seed rate <strong>of</strong> rajmah, toria,<br />

linseed, lentil, and buckwheat were 75 kg ha -1 , 10 kg ha -1 , 20 kg ha -1 , 30 kg ha -1 , and 20 kg<br />

ha -1 respectively. The experimental plot was ploughed by tractor-drawn plough followed by<br />

harrowing and laddering. Rows were prepared for sowing manually at 30cm and plant-toplant<br />

distance was kept at 10cm. The fertilizer was applied as per recommendation <strong>of</strong> the<br />

package <strong>of</strong> practices <strong>of</strong> Assam in terms <strong>of</strong> Urea, SSP, and MOP. The crops were sown in the<br />

field within second to third week <strong>of</strong> each year. Weekly meteorological data in standard<br />

meteorological week (SMW) during the period <strong>of</strong> experimentation was collected at the<br />

meteorological observatory <strong>of</strong> the department <strong>of</strong> agricultural meteorology, Biswanath College<br />

<strong>of</strong> Agriculture, Assam Agricultural University, Biswanath Chariali. The yield <strong>of</strong> the<br />

intercrops was converted to rajmah equivalent and comparison among the intercropping<br />

systems were made accordingly.<br />

Results<br />

190 | Page<br />

Ecosystem based approaches for climate change adaptation, ecosystem services, integrated farming system models,<br />

Land degradation neutrality


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

The growth and yield attributing characters and yield <strong>of</strong> the crops. As the bio-metric parameters<br />

and structural make up as well as morphology <strong>of</strong> the intercrops species differ widely due to their<br />

genetic variations, statistical analysis <strong>of</strong> the intercrops were not done and only average value was<br />

given in the Table.<br />

Equivalent yield <strong>of</strong> the system: The rajmah equivalent yields <strong>of</strong> the different intercropping<br />

system were calculated for each year individually and pooled analysis was done. The study<br />

revealed that rajmah + lentil (1:1) ratio was the best treatment showing highest yield <strong>of</strong> 13.48 q<br />

ha -1 which was at par with Rajmah +linseed (2:1): Rajmah +linseed (1:1) and Rajmah +lentil<br />

(2:1) with a system yield <strong>of</strong> 12.83 qha -1 , 12.66 qha -1 and 12.59 qha -1 , respectively. The toria nad<br />

buckwheat was not performing well with rajmah in both 1:1 and 2:1 ratio. For measuring <strong>of</strong><br />

biological efficiency <strong>of</strong> the intercropping, land equivalent ratio (LER) was calculated and it was<br />

found that, linseed and lentil was more beneficial and economical as intercrop as compared to<br />

toria and buckwheat.<br />

The economics <strong>of</strong> different intercropping system was also calculated in terms <strong>of</strong> gross return, net<br />

return and B:C ratio. Among the intercropping system <strong>of</strong> lentil and linseed, both the ratio <strong>of</strong> 1:1<br />

ratio and 2:1 ratio is showing the B:C ratio more than 2 with a value <strong>of</strong> 2.58, 2.54, 2.50 and 2.50<br />

each in rajmah +linseed (2:1), rajmah +lentil (1:1), rajmah +linseed (1:1) and rajmah +lentil (2:1),<br />

respectively. The results can be supported by findings noted by Tripathi et al. where maize +<br />

cowpea-wheat combination was the most productive and economic intercrop combination, with<br />

an increase in net economic return (43.63%) and B: C ratio <strong>of</strong> 1.94.<br />

Conclusion<br />

Among the five different rabi crops studied to assess the best intercrops with rajmah it has been<br />

seen that lentil and linseed was found to be more efficient and pr<strong>of</strong>itable than toria and<br />

buckwheat. The highest land equivalent ratio, equivalent yield, and monetary advantage were<br />

recorded in the rajmah + linseed intercropping <strong>of</strong> 2:1 ratio. The rajmah crop was not performing<br />

well when intercropped with toria and buckwheat which is mainly due to the more height <strong>of</strong> the<br />

intercrops resulting competition for light and others more particularly at early stage <strong>of</strong> growth <strong>of</strong><br />

the main crop rajmah.<br />

References<br />

Coll, L., Cerrudo, A., Rizzalli, R., Monzon, J. P. and Andrade, F. H. 2012. Capture and use <strong>of</strong><br />

water and radiation in summer intercrops in the south-east Pampas <strong>of</strong> Argentina. Field<br />

Crops Research. 134: 105-113<br />

Tripathi, S. C., Venkatesh, K., Meena, R. P., Chander, S., & Singh, G. P., (2021). Sustainable<br />

intensification <strong>of</strong> maize and wheat cropping system through pulse intercropping,<br />

Scientific Reports, 11(1), 1-10.<br />

Ecosystem based approaches for climate change adaptation, ecosystem services, integrated farming system<br />

models, Land degradation neutrality<br />

191 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA,<br />

Hyderabad<br />

Growth, yield attributes and yields <strong>of</strong> the main and intercrops <strong>of</strong> the different intercropping system<br />

Treatments<br />

Plant height<br />

(cm)<br />

Cyme/siliqua<br />

pod/plant<br />

Test weight.(g) Main crop yield (qha -1 ) Intercrop yield (qha -1 )<br />

rajmah Intercrop rajmah Intercrop rajmah intercrop 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 Pooled 2018-<br />

19<br />

2019-<br />

20<br />

2020-21 Pooled<br />

T 1: Sole Rajmah 44.67 - 19.69 - 317.62 - 13.00 14.33 13.34 13.55 - - -<br />

T 2: Sole toria - 69.64 - 57.91 - 3.67 12.00 12.67 11.84 12.17 - - -<br />

T 3: Sole linseed - 46.02 - 24.30 - 5.11 7.83 6.67 6.60 7.03 - - -<br />

T 4: Sole lentil - 25.0 - 24.60 - 14.27 4.73 5.33 4.94 5.02 - - -<br />

T 5 : Sole buckwheat - 72.63 - 27.80 - 18.60 6.43 14.83 13.39 11.72 - - -<br />

T 6 : Rajmah +toria (1:1) 47.27 73.69 11.81 48.20 312.57 3.28 3.33 3.27 3.24 3.28 8.83 9.03 10.67 9.84<br />

T 7: Rajmah+linseed (1:1) 43.07 45.17 15.25 23.87 315.74 4.50 8.33 10.00 9.64 9.32 5.67 5.00 5.10 5.26<br />

T 8: Rajmah +lentil (1:1) 44.67 19.50 16.50 19.19 316.83 13.88 8.83 10.67 8.67 9.40 3.83 2.83 3.40 3.35<br />

T 9: Rajmah+buckwheat 44.84 81.22 13.67 31.24 316.15 11.72<br />

9.67<br />

4.10<br />

5.13 7.67<br />

(1:1)<br />

4.17 4.17<br />

4.14<br />

7.49<br />

T 10: Rajmah +toria (2:1) 42.10 69.33 14.34 41.75 312.56 3.32 4.83 3.67 4.10 4.27 7.67 8.50 8.14 8.10<br />

T 11: Rajmah +linseed (2:1) 44.00 46.57 18.48 32.98 316.12 4.98 9.50 10.83 11.20 10.51 3.93 3.67 4.20 3.94<br />

T 12: Rajmah +lentil (2:1) 46.12 20.93 13.20 24.27 316.24 13.56 9.17 9.83 9.54 9.52 3.43 2.27 2.96 2.90<br />

T 13:<br />

(2:1)<br />

Rajmah+buckwheat 44.10 83.02 12.96 34.80 316.11 12.30<br />

7.70<br />

5.17<br />

4.50 5.40<br />

5.83 5.33<br />

5.44<br />

5.87<br />

CD at 5% NS - NS - NS - - - - - - - - -<br />

Ecosystem based approaches for climate change adaptation, ecosystem services, integrated farming system models, Land degradation neutrality<br />

192 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-<br />

CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Rajmah Equivalent Yield (REY) , Land Equivalent Ratio (LER) and Rain Water Use Efficiency (RWUE) <strong>of</strong> the system<br />

Treatments REY (qha -1 ) LER RWUE (Kgha -1 mm)<br />

2018 2019 2020 Pooled 2018 2019 2020 pooled 2018 2019 2020 Pooled<br />

T 1: Sole Rajmah 13.00 14.33 13.34 13.56 1 1 1 1 8.56 10.07 11.47 10.03<br />

T 2: Sole toria 8.00 8.44 7.89 8.11 1 1 1 1 5.27 5.93 6.76 5.98<br />

T 3: Sole linseed 5.22 4.44 4.40 4.68 1 1 1 1 3.44 3.12 3.56 3.37<br />

T 4: Sole lentil 5.52 6.22 5.64 5.56 1 1 1 1 3.64 4.37 4.98 4.33<br />

T 5: Sole buckwheat 5.36 12.36 8.05 8.55 1 1 1 1 3.53 8.68 9.89 7.37<br />

T 6: Rajmah +toria (1:1) 10.56 11.16 11.01 10.91 1.09 1.16 1.14 1.13 6.95 7.83 8.92 7.90<br />

T 7: Rajmah +linseed (1:1) 12.11 13.33 12.55 12.66 1.52 1.41 1.49 1.48 7.97 9.36 10.67 9.33<br />

T 8: Rajmah +lentil (1:1) 13.30 13.97 13.18 13.48 1.53 1.38 1.32 1.37 8.76 9.81 11.18 9.92<br />

T 9: Rajmah +buckwheat (1:1) 8.45 12.22 11.72 10.79 1.14 1.10 1.02 1.03 5.56 8.58 9.78 7.97<br />

T 10: Rajmah +toria (2:1) 9.94 9.33 9.5 9.59 0.93 0.95 0.98 0.97 6.55 6.55 7.47 6.86<br />

T 11: Rajmah +linseed (2:1) 12.12 13.28 13.1 12.83 1.62 1.38 1.46 1.46 7.98 9.32 10.62 9.31<br />

T 12:Rajmah +lentil (2:1) 13.18 12.48 12.14 12.59 1.48 1.25 1.30 1.29 8.67 8.76 9.98 9.14<br />

T 13:Rajmah+buckwheat (2:1) 8.83 10.56 10.32 9.90 1.17 1.08 0.95 1.00 5.82 7.41 8.44 7.22<br />

CD at 5% 1.29 1.65 1.40 2.38 - - - - - - - -<br />

Ecosystem based approaches for climate change adaptation, ecosystem services, integrated farming system models, Land degradation neutrality<br />

193 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA,<br />

Hyderabad<br />

Treatments<br />

COC<br />

(Rs. ha -1 )<br />

Economics <strong>of</strong> the different rajmah based intercropping system<br />

Gross return (Rs. ha -1 ) Net return (Rs. ha -1 ) B:C ratio<br />

2018 2019 2020 pooled 2018 2019 2020 pooled 2018 2019 2020 pooled<br />

T 1: Sole Rajmah 29880 78000 85980 80040 81340 48120 56100 50160 51460 2.61 2.87 2.67 2.71<br />

T 2: Sole toria 20670 48000 50640 47340 48660 27330 29970 26670 27990 2.32 2.44 2.29 2.35<br />

T 3: Sole linseed 20200 31320 26640 26400 28120 11120 6440 6200 7920 1.55 1.31 1.30 1.38<br />

T 4: Sole lentil 20770 33120 37320 29640 33360 12350 16550 8870 12590 1.59 1.79 1.42 1.60<br />

T 5: Sole buckwheat 19120 32160 54150 56950 47753 13040 35030 37830 28633 1.68 2.83 2.97 2.49<br />

T 6: Rajmah +toria (1:1) 30355 63360 66960 66120 65480 33005 36605 35765 35125 2.08 2.20 2.17 2.15<br />

T 7: Rajmah +linseed (1:1) 30680 72660 79980 78240 76960 41980 49300 47560 46280 2.36 2.60 2.55 2.50<br />

T 8: Rajmah +lentil (1:1) 30930 79800 83820 72420 78680 48870 52890 41490 47750 2.58 2.70 2.34 2.54<br />

T 9: Rajmah +buckwheat<br />

(1:1)<br />

30680<br />

50700 73320 72900 65640 20020 42640 42220 34960 1.65 2.38 2.37 2.13<br />

T 10:Rajmah +toria (2:1) 30117 59640 55980 57120 57580 29523 25863 27003 27463 1.98 1.85 1.89 1.90<br />

T 11: Rajmah +linseed (2:1) 30280 72720 79680 82800 78400 42440 49400 52520 48120 2.40 2.63 2.73 2.58<br />

T 12:Rajmah +lentil (2:1) 30405 79080 74880 75000 76320 48675 44475 44595 45915 2.60 2.46 2.46 2.50<br />

T 13:Rajmah<br />

(2:1)<br />

+buckwheat<br />

30280<br />

52980 63360 69480 61940 22700 33080 39200 31660 1.74 2.09 2.29 2.04<br />

Ecosystem based approaches for climate change adaptation, ecosystem services, integrated farming system models, Land degradation neutrality<br />

194 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

T2-21P-1292<br />

Effect <strong>of</strong> Sowing Windows on Production <strong>of</strong> rabi Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor<br />

L.) in Scarcity Zone <strong>of</strong> Maharashtra<br />

V. T. Jadhav*, V. M. Londhe, J. D. Jadhav and V. M. Amrutsagar<br />

Mahatma Phule Krishi Vidyapeeth, Rahuri,<br />

All India Coordinated Research Project on Agrometeorology,<br />

Zonal Agriculture Research Station, Solapur, Maharashtra. 413 002<br />

*vtj2009@rediffmail.com<br />

Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.,) plays an important role as a grain and fodder crop for both arid<br />

and semi-arid regions <strong>of</strong> the world. This importance is due to its higher water use efficiency,<br />

relatively good tolerance to drought and salt stresses, and good competitiveness with weeds in<br />

advanced growth stages. Sorghum growth, development, and yield depends on environmental<br />

conditions as temperature and precipitation. Deciding on early or late planting depends on a<br />

farmer’s ability to deal with the risk <strong>of</strong> poor crop establishment with early planting or the effect<br />

<strong>of</strong> water or heat stress at reproductive stages with late planting. Since sorghum is cultivated<br />

majorly as a rainfed crop, its productivity is significantly influenced by climatic elements<br />

(Srivastava et al. 2010). Among the cereals in India, sorghum ranks third, next to rice and<br />

wheat. Sorghum is a rich source <strong>of</strong> carbohydrates, proteins, minerals, and vitamins B1 and B2.<br />

Keeping this in view, this experiment was conducted with the objective to study suitable<br />

variety under suitable weather conditions for optimum production and identify the suitable<br />

sowing date for better growth and yield <strong>of</strong> sorghum crop.<br />

Methodology<br />

The experiment was carried out for five years during the rabi season from 2016-17 to 2020-21<br />

at Dry Farming Research Station, Solapur (17.65º N 75º 90’ E and 483.6 m MSL) on medium<br />

black soil (60 cm soil depth). The experiment was laid out in a split-plot design with four<br />

replications. Treatments were comprised <strong>of</strong> four sowing dates i.e. S1: MW 36 (Sept.03-09)<br />

Purva nakshatra, S 2: MW 38 (Sept.17-23) Uttara nakshatra, S 3: MW 40 (Oct.01-07) Hasta<br />

nakshatra, S4: MW 40 (Oct.15-21) Chitra nakshatra. Three sorghum genotypes i.e. V1: M-35-<br />

1, V2: Mauli, and V3: Yashoda were sown at a spacing <strong>of</strong> 45cm×15cm. The sowing <strong>of</strong> seed was<br />

done by dibbling method on the respective date <strong>of</strong> sowing. Recommended packages <strong>of</strong><br />

practices were uniformly followed.<br />

Results<br />

Among all the sowing, dates the crop sown at MW 40 (01-07th Oct) S 3 produced maximum<br />

grain yield (808.29 kg ha -1 ) and total monetary returns (Rs. 26633 ha -1 ) over the rest <strong>of</strong> the<br />

treatments. These results are in concurrence with the findings <strong>of</strong> (Hulihalli et al. 2016). This<br />

Ecosystem based approaches for climate change adaptation, ecosystem services, integrated farming system<br />

models, Land degradation neutrality<br />

195 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

might be due to uneven and inadequate distribution <strong>of</strong> rainfall and moisture during the<br />

vegetative growth period <strong>of</strong> crops. It is also seen that there was a delay in sowing increase in<br />

consistency in grain yield production than the earlier sowing. Among the varieties, M-35-1<br />

produced significantly higher grain yield (717.94 kg ha -1 ) and total monetary returns<br />

(Rs.24968 ha -1 ) over the other variety.<br />

The growth and development <strong>of</strong> crop is influenced by environmental conditions such as<br />

temperature, radiation, and photoperiod (Mokashi et al. 2008). The mean CUM and MUE<br />

recorded by sorghum crop was 240 mm and 2.7 kg ha- 1 mm. The highest CUM was recorded by<br />

S 3 sown crop (258 mm) however the MUE was recorded by S 3 sown crop (3.5 kg ha -1 mm).<br />

This indicated that S 3 sown crop (Hasta Nakshatra) utilized moisture more efficiently than<br />

other dates <strong>of</strong> sowing. The Tmax and Tmin were correlated with the grain yield <strong>of</strong> rabi sorghum.<br />

It showed a polynomial relationship with grain yield. This indicated that with an increase <strong>of</strong><br />

Tmax there was an increase in grain yield upto 31.8 0 C and later on yield decreased with an<br />

increase in Tmax. This indicated that with an increase <strong>of</strong> T min there was an increase in grain<br />

yield up to 17.5 0 C later on yield decreased with an increase in T min.<br />

Pooled grain yield (kg ha -1 ) and total monetary returns (TMR) <strong>of</strong> rabi sorghum as<br />

influenced by sowing dates and varieties 2016 to 2020.<br />

Treatment 2016-<br />

17<br />

Main=Sowing dates<br />

2017-<br />

18<br />

2018-<br />

19<br />

2019-<br />

20<br />

2020-<br />

21<br />

Pooled<br />

yield<br />

Pooled<br />

TMR<br />

S 1 = MW 36 (Sept.03-09) Purva nakshtra 793.9 508.1 516.0 579.1 846.67 648.77 22108<br />

S 2 = MW 38 (Sept.17-23) Uttara nakshtra 897.4 618.2 583.3 701.6 926.92 745.46 25281<br />

S 3 = MW 40 (Oct. 01-07) Hasta nakshtra 1042.4 844.4 677.6 503.5 973.42 808.28 26633<br />

S 4 = MW 42 (Oct.15-21) Chitra nakshtra 480.9 434.0 379.9 357.2 424.24 415.25 14935<br />

Mean 803.7 601.2 539.2 535.4 792.81 654.44 22239<br />

Sub=Varieties<br />

V 1 = Maldandi (M-35-1) 884.3 659.1 594.3 588.5 863.56 717.94 24968<br />

V 2 = Mauli 770.2 573.2 514.8 534.3 801.44 638.79 21756<br />

V 3 = Yashoda 756.4 571.2 508.6 483.3 713.43 606.59 19994<br />

Mean 803.7 601.2 539.2 535.4 792.81 654.44 22239<br />

S.E.+ (Sowing dates) 57.1 44.4 37.02 25.2 27.2 44.5 1352.9<br />

C.D. at 5 % 182.6 142.1 118.45 80.7 87.1 137.1 4168.7<br />

S.E.+ (Varieties) 33.3 23.9 22.16 19.6 23.3 10.3 248.9<br />

C.D. at 5 % 97.1 69.6 64.69 57.3 68.1 29.7 716.9<br />

S.E.+ (SD X V) 66.5 47.7 44.32 39.3 46.7 20.6 497.7<br />

C.D. at 5 % NS NS NS NS NS NS NS<br />

196 | Page<br />

Ecosystem based approaches for climate change adaptation, ecosystem services, integrated farming system models, Land<br />

degradation neutrality


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Conclusion<br />

Among the sowing dates crop sown at 40 MW (S3) recorded a significantly higher yield<br />

(808.29 kg/ha) with TMR. Hasta sown sorghum gets sufficient period for its growth and<br />

reproduction with higher CUM (240 mm), MUE (2.7 kg ha -1 mm), GDD (2984) and RUE (2.72<br />

g MJ -1 ). Positive correlation with Tmax up to 31.8 0 c and Tmin 17.5 0 c. Among varieties, V1<br />

performed significantly better than other varieties under study.<br />

CUM and MUE as influenced by sowing time in rabi sorghum (2016 to 2020).<br />

Sowing CUM (mm) MUE (kg ha -1 mm )<br />

Time M-35-1 Mauli Yashoda Mean M-35-1 Mauli Yashoda Mean<br />

S 1 270 285 290 282 2.7 2.2 2.0 2.3<br />

S 2 240 268 270 259 3.4 2.7 2.6 2.9<br />

S 3 210 240 250 233 4.1 3.3 3.1 3.5<br />

S 4 185 189 192 189 2.5 2.1 2.0 2.2<br />

Mean 226 245 250 240 3.1 2.6 2.4 2.7<br />

GY (Kg/ha)<br />

900<br />

650<br />

Grain yield with CUM in Sorghum<br />

Grain Yield<br />

y = -0.0373x 2 + 15.477x - 737.45<br />

R² = 0.8693<br />

400<br />

100 150 200 250 300 350<br />

CUM (mm)<br />

GY (Kg/ha)<br />

900<br />

650<br />

Grain yield with Tmax in Sorghum<br />

Yield<br />

y = 31254x 2 - 2E+06x + 3E+07<br />

R² = 0.8657<br />

400<br />

31.031.231.431.631.832.032.232.432.632.8<br />

Tmax ( 0 C)<br />

GY (Kg/ha)<br />

Grain Yield<br />

1000<br />

y = 1243.5x 2 - 5234.8x + 5898.6<br />

800 R² = 0.8159<br />

600<br />

400<br />

2.10 2.30 2.50 2.70 2.90<br />

MUE (kg/ha mm)<br />

References<br />

Grain yield with MUE in Sorghum<br />

Hulihalli, U.K., Shantveerayya and Mammigatti, U.V. 2016. Effect <strong>of</strong> Planting Dates and<br />

Correlation studies on Growth and Yield <strong>of</strong> Rabi Sorghum Genotypes. Adv. Life Sci.<br />

5(12).<br />

Ecosystem based approaches for climate change adaptation, ecosystem services, integrated farming system<br />

models, Land degradation neutrality<br />

197 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Mokashi, D.D., Jadhav, J.D, Khadtare, S.V. and Deshpande, A.N. 2008. Crop weather<br />

relationship in rabi sorghum. Internat. J. Agric. Sci. 4 (1).<br />

Srivastava, A., Naresh Kumar, S. and Aggarwal, P.K. 2010. Assessment on vulnerability <strong>of</strong><br />

sorghum to climate change in India, Agric. Ecosyst. Environ.138: 160–169<br />

T2-22P-1302<br />

Effect <strong>of</strong> Sowing Windows on Production <strong>of</strong> Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) in<br />

Scarcity Zone <strong>of</strong> Maharashtra<br />

V. M. Londhe*, V. T. Jadhav, J. D. Jadhav and V. M. Amrutsagar<br />

Mahatma Phule Krishi Vidyapeeth, Rahuri,<br />

All India Coordinated Research Project on Agrometeorology,<br />

Zonal Agriculture Research Station, Solapur 413 002, Maharashtra<br />

*vikaslondhe603@gmail.com<br />

Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) is cultivated for food and fodder on a large scale in arid and<br />

semiarid regions. Chickpea is the second-most important pulse crop after pigeonpea in the<br />

World for human diet and other use. Pulses once referred to as the poor man’s meat is<br />

becoming increasingly important in crop production systems. Poor agronomic practices such as<br />

seed rate, date <strong>of</strong> sowing, selection <strong>of</strong> suitable genotypes, fertilizer management, etc. are<br />

responsible for the low productivity <strong>of</strong> chickpea in India. Within the genetic limits, time <strong>of</strong><br />

sowing is an important agronomic factor affecting the productivity <strong>of</strong> most <strong>of</strong> the arable crops,<br />

owing to changes in environmental conditions to which phenological stages <strong>of</strong> crops are<br />

exposed. Amongst the agronomic practices, sowing methods and proper seed rate are <strong>of</strong> great<br />

importance (Reddy et al., 2003). Generally, chickpea adapts to high temperatures, however,<br />

heat stress during the reproductive phase can cause significant yield loss. with this view, the<br />

present studies were undertaken with the objective <strong>of</strong> predicting the economical yield <strong>of</strong><br />

chickpea in relation to weather parameters.<br />

Methodology<br />

The study was conducted at the research farm <strong>of</strong> Zonal Agricultural Research Station, Solapur,<br />

Mahatma Phule Krishi Vidyapeeth, Rahuri, Maharashtra (India) during the year 2016-2020 in<br />

the rabi season. The experiment was conducted in a split-plot design with four replications.<br />

Treatment combinations were formed considering different cultivars viz., S 1 = MW 38 (Sept<br />

17-23), Uttara nakshatra, S 2 = MW 40 (Oct. 01-07), Hasta nakshatra, S 3 = MW 42 (Oct. 15-<br />

21), Chitra nakshatra and S4 = MW 44 (Oct. 29- Nov.04), Swati nakshatra. Late sowing, after<br />

November 18 reduced yield by 28% for every 10-day interval delay (Paikaray and Misra,<br />

1992).<br />

198 | Page<br />

Ecosystem based approaches for climate change adaptation, ecosystem services, integrated farming system models, Land<br />

degradation neutrality


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Results<br />

Chickpea sown at MW 38 (S 1) (Uttara Nakshatra) produced a significant maximum grain yield<br />

(850.79 kg ha -1 ) and total monetary returns (Rs. 35247 ha -1 ) over S3 and S4 sown crop as<br />

discussed in the table below i.e. MW 42 and 44 (Chitra and Swati Nakshatra). Results are in<br />

close agreement with the finding <strong>of</strong> InduBalaSethi et al, (2016). Variety Digvijay produced<br />

more grain yield (719.87 kg ha -1 ), and total monetary returns (Rs. 29646 ha -1 ) over variety<br />

Vijay. This might be due to the efficient utilization <strong>of</strong> available soil moisture. . Parmar et al.<br />

(2015) revealed that maximum grain yield was recorded from early sown whereas minimum<br />

yield was obtained from the late sown crop <strong>of</strong> chickpea.<br />

The average CUM (288 mm) was recorded higher by the S 1 sown crop (MW 38 (Sept. 17-23),<br />

Uttaranakshatra) and MUE (3.7 kg ha -1 mm) was recorded higher by the S1 sown crop (MW<br />

38 i.e. Uttara sown crop). Among the varieties Digvijay recorded the highest average value <strong>of</strong><br />

CUM and MUE as shown in Table. The yield was decreased if Tmax increases above 31.8 0 C.<br />

The Tmin <strong>of</strong> 18.3 0 C was found to be optimum for getting higher grain yield and thereafter<br />

there was a decrease in chickpea yield.<br />

Pooled grain yield (kg ha -1 ) and total monetary returns (TMR) (Rs ha -1 ) <strong>of</strong> rabi chickpea<br />

as influenced by various sowing dates and varieties. (2016 to 2020)<br />

Treatment 2016-<br />

17<br />

2017-<br />

18<br />

2018-<br />

19<br />

2019-<br />

20<br />

2020-<br />

21<br />

Pooled<br />

Yield<br />

Pooled<br />

TMR<br />

Main=Sowing dates<br />

S 1 = MW 38 (Sept 01-07) Uttara nakshatra 1255.8 660.0 564.5 712.5 1061.2 850.79 35247<br />

S 2 = MW 40 (Oct. 01-07) Hasta nakshatra 1113.1 510.6 467.1 507.9 880.3 695.80 29133<br />

S 3 = MW 42 (Oct. 15-21) Chitra nakshatra 985.6 483.2 413.3 396.5 769.0 609.53 25165<br />

S 4= MW 44 (Oct. 29- Nov.04) Swati nakshatra 812.3 354.5 310.3 342.7 465.9 457.15 18675<br />

Mean 1041.7 502.1 438.8 489.9 794.1 653.32 27055<br />

Sub=Two varieties<br />

V 1 = Vijay 937.1 433.9 371.6 439.7 751.6 586.76 24464<br />

V 2 = Digvijay 1146.3 570.3 506.0 540.1 836.6 719.87 29646<br />

Mean 1041.7 502.1 438.8 489.9 794.1 653.32 27055<br />

S.E.+ (Sowing dates) 25.2 29.1 26.7 40.4 41.4 28.6 1204<br />

C.D. at 5 % 80.6 93.1 85.4 129.2 132.3 88.0 3711<br />

S.E.+ (Varieties) 20.1 19.2 15.7 26.7 27.5 10.4 380.9<br />

C.D. at 5 % 62.0 59.2 48.3 82.2 84.8 31.2 1142.0<br />

S.E.+ (SD X V) 40.2 38.5 31.3 53.4 55.0 20.8 761.8<br />

C.D. at 5 % NS NS NS NS NS NS NS<br />

Ecosystem based approaches for climate change adaptation, ecosystem services, integrated farming system<br />

models, Land degradation neutrality<br />

199 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

CUM and MUE as influenced in chickpea (2016-17 to 2020-21)<br />

Treatment CUM (mm) MUE (kg ha -1 mm) Treatment CUM (mm) MUE(kg ha -1 mm)<br />

S 1V 1 300.8 3.4 S 3V 1 250.2 3.0<br />

S 1V 2 275.2 4.0 S 3V 2 240.0 3.3<br />

S 2V 1 280.0 3.0 S 4V 1 190.8 2.1<br />

S 2V 2 269.8 3.4 S 4V 2 170.2 3.1<br />

Grain yield with CUM in Chickpea<br />

Grain yield with MUE in Chickpea<br />

Grain Yield<br />

Grain Yield<br />

GY (Kg/ha)<br />

y = 0.0058x 2 + 1.9489x - 55.185<br />

R² = 0.8078<br />

GY (Kg/ha)<br />

y = 381.7x - 413.56<br />

R² = 0.7558<br />

CUM (mm)<br />

MUE (kg ha -1 mm)<br />

Grain yield with Tmax in<br />

Chick pea<br />

Grain yield with Tmin in Chickpea<br />

Yield<br />

Yield<br />

GY (Kg/ha)<br />

y = -2037.5x 2 + 130073x - 2E+06<br />

R² = 0.8872<br />

GY (Kg/ha)<br />

y = -52.589x 2 + 1963.9x - 17279<br />

R² = 0.9241<br />

Tmax (°C)<br />

Tmin (⁰C)<br />

Conclusion<br />

Chickpea sown at 38 MW (S1) produced significantly higher yields and total monetary<br />

returns.Among varieties, Digvijay (V 2) recorded higher values than Vijay under study.<br />

References<br />

Indu, B.S., Meena, S., Kumar, P., and Jajoria, M. 2016. Yield performance <strong>of</strong> chickpea<br />

cultivars as influenced by sowing time and seed rate. BioScan. 11(1): 407-409.<br />

Paikaray, R.K., and Misra, R.C. 1992. Performance <strong>of</strong> chickpea under different dates <strong>of</strong> sowing<br />

in the eastern ghat highland zone <strong>of</strong> Orrisa, India. Int. Chickpea News. 27: 24-25.<br />

Reddy, B.V., Reddy, S., Bidinger, P.S., and Blummel, M. 2003. Crop management factors<br />

influencing- yield and quality <strong>of</strong> crop residues. Field Crops Res. 84: 57-77.<br />

Ecosystem based approaches for climate change adaptation, ecosystem services, integrated farming system models, Land<br />

200 | Page<br />

degradation neutrality


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

T2-23P-1315<br />

Effect <strong>of</strong> Thermal Environment on Yield <strong>of</strong> Tomato under Different<br />

Microclimatic Conditions at Upper Brahmaputra Valley Zone <strong>of</strong> Assam<br />

A. Kalia*, P. Neog 1 , R.l. Deka, D. B. Phukan 2 , K.Kurmi 3 and K. Medhi<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Agrometeorology, Assam Agricultural University, Jorhat- 785013<br />

1 Department <strong>of</strong> Agrometeorology, B. N. College <strong>of</strong> Agriculture, Biswanath Chariali- 784176<br />

2 Department <strong>of</strong> Horticulture, Assam Agricultural University, Jorhat- 785013<br />

3 Department <strong>of</strong> Agronomy, Assam Agricultural University, Jorhat- 785013<br />

* amlanika123@gmail.com<br />

A field experiment was conducted during 2019-20 at AAU, Jorhat to evaluate the effect <strong>of</strong> the<br />

thermal environment on the yield <strong>of</strong> tomato variety Arka Rakshak. The variety was planted on<br />

four planting dates starting from 25 October at 15 days intervals and three mulching treatments<br />

(non-mulch, rice straw mulch, and black polythene) in the split-plot design. The soil<br />

temperatures were recorded daily in twelve plots during the 43 to 12 SMW at two soil depths<br />

<strong>of</strong> 5 cm and 10 cm. Agro-climatic indices viz., growing degree day, Day temperature, and heat<br />

use efficiency (HUE) were calculated following standard procedures. The occurrence <strong>of</strong> lower<br />

daily minimum temperature (


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

In Assam, Tomato is usually grown during the rabi season as a rainfed crop. The soil moisture<br />

fluctuation and low temperature during the critical crop growth stages are the major limiting<br />

factors hindering the growth and yield <strong>of</strong> the tomato crop in Assam. Lowering both soil and air<br />

temperatures below 17ºC during the rabi season in Assam is a common phenomenon, which is<br />

detrimental to the growth and development, and yield <strong>of</strong> the tomato. Moreover, the daily<br />

minimum temperature goes below 10ºC for about two months (Mid -December to Mid -<br />

February), which adversely affects the reproductive stage <strong>of</strong> the tomato crop planted at the<br />

normal time. On the other hand fruit production <strong>of</strong> tomato is gradually dropped as the<br />

temperature increased by the end <strong>of</strong> the winter season. However, these problems can be<br />

nullified up to an extent with the adoption <strong>of</strong> suitable adaptation strategies like microclimatic<br />

modification with alteration <strong>of</strong> planting dates and application <strong>of</strong> mulches. The use <strong>of</strong> mulches<br />

modifies the microclimate <strong>of</strong> the crop by altering not only the soil hydrothermal as well as<br />

radiation regimes at the soil surface and within the crop canopy. Generally, polythene mulches<br />

increase both maximum and minimum soil temperatures (Ham et al., 1993), whereas, organic<br />

mulches decrease maximum but increase minimum soil temperature (Teasdale and Mohler,<br />

1993) as compared to un-mulched soil. Thus, modification <strong>of</strong> the thermal environment for<br />

increasing the yield <strong>of</strong> tomato crops seems to be very important. The study hypothesized that<br />

the mulching and altering dates <strong>of</strong> planting would create a congenial microclimate for matching<br />

growing periods to fit in the required microclimatic conditions and also for better growth,<br />

development, and yield <strong>of</strong> the crop. The investigation was planned to study the effect <strong>of</strong><br />

modified thermal regimes on the yield <strong>of</strong> the Tomato under varying microenvironments.<br />

Methodology<br />

The study was carried out at the Experimental Farm <strong>of</strong> Assam Agricultural University, Jorhat,<br />

Assam (26°42'39" N and 93°15'39" E) during rabi, 2019-20. Tomato cultivar Arka<br />

Rakshak was grown under rainfed conditions in the split-plot design with four dates <strong>of</strong> planting<br />

(P 1: 25th October, P 2: 14 th November, P 3: 3 rd December, and P 4: 8 th January) and three<br />

mulching treatments (M0: Non-mulch, M1: Rice straw mulch and M2: Black polythene). Daily<br />

meteorological data <strong>of</strong> maximum and minimum temperatures during the crop growth period<br />

were collected from the Department <strong>of</strong> the university and converted to weekly values according<br />

to Standard Meteorological Weeks (43 rd to 19 th weeks, 2019-20). Micrometeorological<br />

observations such as daily morning and evening soil temperature were recorded in representing<br />

plots. Growth parameters and phenological observations were recorded periodically. The<br />

accumulation <strong>of</strong> heat unit (GDD) from sowing to the end <strong>of</strong> the harvest and HUE was<br />

computed for different treatments following Medhi et al., (2019). The accumulated Day<br />

temperature during the crop growth period was also calculated following Venkatraman (1968).<br />

The fruit yield at maturity was recorded from a 1 m 2 area from each plot as well as from the<br />

whole plot. Thermal indices were utilized for studying the cause-effect relationship.<br />

202 | Page<br />

Ecosystem based approaches for climate change adaptation, ecosystem services, integrated farming system models, Land<br />

degradation neutrality


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Results<br />

Variation <strong>of</strong> air temperature during the crop growth period:<br />

The variation <strong>of</strong> daily maximum temperatures during the growing period <strong>of</strong> the crop (from 25 th<br />

October 2019 to 12 th May 2020) ranged from 21.7 to 31.7°C with an average temperature and<br />

coefficient <strong>of</strong> variation <strong>of</strong> 26.7°C and 11.7 percent, respectively. The weekly maximum<br />

temperature recorded in the second week <strong>of</strong> the crop season was 30.4°C, which reduced<br />

continuously and reached the minimum <strong>of</strong> 20.7°C during 1 st SMW. Thereafter, the weekly<br />

maximum temperature started to increase and reached a maximum value <strong>of</strong> 31.7°C during the<br />

13 th standard week. It was observed that the daily maximum temperature never exceeded<br />

34.6°C during the crop growth period and always remained lower than the maximum cardinal<br />

temperature (38°C). However, increasing the daily maximum temperature above 30°C after<br />

mid-March (11 SMW) was detrimental to the growth and yield <strong>of</strong> the crop as it was well above<br />

the optimum cardinal temperature <strong>of</strong> 18 to 24°C <strong>of</strong> the crop.<br />

The mean daily minimum temperatures during different standard meteorological weeks in the<br />

crop growing season varied from 8.4°C to 20.8°C at 2 nd SMW and 19 th SMW, respectively.<br />

From the 45thSMW onwards, the minimum temperature decreased gradually and attained the<br />

minimum value <strong>of</strong> 8.4°C at 52 nd SMW, thereafter, it increased gradually and became 20.8°C at<br />

18 th SMW. It was observed that the mean daily minimum temperature during the first week <strong>of</strong><br />

December to the first week <strong>of</strong> February remained below 10°C, with the maximum limit <strong>of</strong><br />

6.2°C, which was even lower than the base temperature (7°C) <strong>of</strong> the crop.<br />

Variation <strong>of</strong> soil temperature under different microclimates<br />

The weekly mean morning and evening soil temperatures ranged from 11.4 to 23.7°Cand 15.1<br />

to 34.5°C, respectively under different planting dates and mulching treatments (Fig. 1). The<br />

highest morning soil temperatures with a weekly mean <strong>of</strong> 16.9°C were recorded under P1,<br />

which reduced gradually with successive delay in planting with the mean morning soil<br />

temperatures <strong>of</strong> 15.7 (P 2), 15.3 (P 3) and 14.9°C (P 4). The highest and the lowest mean evening<br />

soil temperature <strong>of</strong> 26.3°C and 23.6°Cwere recorded under P1 and P2, respectively. Like<br />

morning soil temperature, evening weekly average soil temperatures reduced gradually in the<br />

last two dates <strong>of</strong> plantings (P 3 and P 4). As expected in all planting dates irrespective <strong>of</strong> the<br />

mulching treatments, both weekly morning and evening soil temperatures started to decline<br />

from 47 th SMW and became the minimum between 1stto 3 rd SMW, thereafter it started to<br />

increase gradually towards the end <strong>of</strong> the crop season. Thus, the early stages <strong>of</strong> crop growth <strong>of</strong><br />

the first planting were exposed to higher soil temperatures, while in reproductive growth stages<br />

<strong>of</strong> that planting were exposed to lower temperatures. On the other hand, early and later growth<br />

stages <strong>of</strong> the crop planted on later dates (P3 and P4) were sequentially exposed to lower and<br />

higher soil temperatures.<br />

Ecosystem based approaches for climate change adaptation, ecosystem services, integrated farming system<br />

models, Land degradation neutrality<br />

203 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Under non-mulched treatment, the mean morning soil temperatures varied from 14.3°C (P 4 )<br />

to16.1°C (P1), while the evening soil temperature ranged from 23.3 (P2) to 25.9°C (P1 ) under<br />

different dates <strong>of</strong> planting. Irrespective <strong>of</strong> dates <strong>of</strong> planting the mean weekly temperatures were<br />

the highest under black polythene with mean values <strong>of</strong> 16.3°C and 27.2°Cin morning and<br />

evening, respectively, whereas, the lowest morning temperature was observed under nonmulched<br />

(with a mean value <strong>of</strong> 15.1°C) condition, but the lowest evening temperature was<br />

recorded under straw mulch (22.2°C).<br />

Deviation <strong>of</strong> weekly morning and evening soil temperatures under rice straw mulch and black<br />

polythene from the soil temperatures under non-mulched treatment were calculated and<br />

presented in Fig. 2. The weekly morning soil temperatures under both rice straw (M1) and<br />

black polythene mulch were higher by 0.54 (P3) to 0.63°C (P1) and 1.07 (P2) to 1.63°C (P1),<br />

respectively as compared to the non-mulched treatment. On the other hand, the weekly evening<br />

soil temperature was reduced by 1.02 (P1) to 1.18 °C (P2) under rice straw mulch (M1) but<br />

increased by 1.9 (P2) to 2.47 °C (P1) under black polythene mulch (M2) irrespective <strong>of</strong> planting<br />

dates.<br />

Fruit yield <strong>of</strong> Tomato:<br />

The fruit yield <strong>of</strong> tomato cultivar Arka Rakshak planted under different planting dates and<br />

mulching treatments ranged between 76.6 and 392.6 q ha -1 with an overall mean <strong>of</strong> 234.9 q ha -1 ,<br />

irrespective <strong>of</strong> planting dates and mulching treatments, however, varied significantly under<br />

different dates <strong>of</strong> planting and mulching treatments. The highest and lowest fruit yield was<br />

recorded under the second and last date <strong>of</strong> planting with average yields <strong>of</strong> 137.3 and 99.9 q ha -<br />

1 , respectively. The highest fruit yield was recorded under the second date <strong>of</strong> planting (P2) with<br />

an average yield <strong>of</strong> 337.3 q ha -1 , which reduced gradually by 49.9 and 70.4 percent under the<br />

P3 and P4, respectively. The fruit yield in the case <strong>of</strong> crop planting on 25th October was also<br />

reduced by 3.3 as compared to P2. Among the mulching treatments, the highest fruit yield was<br />

recorded under black polythene (267.9 q ha -1 ), followed by rice straw mulch (234.2 q ha -1 ) and<br />

non-mulched treatment (173.7 q ha -1 ).<br />

The highest fruit yield in P 2 could be attributed to the occurrence <strong>of</strong> a favorable thermal<br />

environment resulting in better crop growth with higher yield attributing characters. In the case<br />

<strong>of</strong> late plantings (beyond 14 November), the period <strong>of</strong> the harvest was reduced considerably<br />

due to exposure <strong>of</strong> the harvesting stage <strong>of</strong> the crop to comparatively higher soil and air<br />

temperature resulting in poor fruit yield on later dates (P3 and P4). Despite experiencing a<br />

longer harvest period, exposure <strong>of</strong> the early growth period to the higher soil and air<br />

temperatures forced the crop to enter into the reproductive stage in advance with lower LAI<br />

and biomass, which caused a reduction <strong>of</strong> fruit yield in the first date <strong>of</strong> planting as compared to<br />

P 2. It is to be mentioned that fruiting and fruit maturity stages <strong>of</strong> the crop planted on the first<br />

204 | Page<br />

Ecosystem based approaches for climate change adaptation, ecosystem services, integrated farming system models, Land<br />

degradation neutrality


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

date <strong>of</strong> planting were exposed to the exceptionally lower minimum temperature (below 10°C)<br />

for about 9 weeks (49 to 5 th SMW). The 54.2 percent increase in fruit yield under black<br />

polythene as compared to the non-mulched condition might be attributed to the fact <strong>of</strong><br />

recording <strong>of</strong> higher soil temperature (weekly mean), particularly during 49thto 5thSMW by up<br />

to 1.84°C under black polythene as compared to non-mulched condition.<br />

Thermal indices:<br />

Irrespective <strong>of</strong> mulching treatments, the GDD accumulation from planting to end <strong>of</strong> the fruit<br />

harvest in tomato variety Arka Rakshak reduced from 2140 to 1463°C Day, when planting the<br />

tomato cultivar was delayed from 25 th October to 3 rd December, but it again increased to<br />

1687°C Day when planting was further delayed to 8th January. Irrespective <strong>of</strong> planting dates,<br />

the highest GDD accumulation to attain the end <strong>of</strong> harvest from planting was observed under<br />

black polythene (1857°C Day), followed by rice straw (1784°C Day) and non-mulched<br />

treatment (1669°C Day), which might be due to increasing in crop duration as a whole under<br />

black polythene.<br />

Day temperature accumulation from planting to the end <strong>of</strong> the harvest was the highest on the<br />

first date <strong>of</strong> planting (3526°C) and lowest on the third date <strong>of</strong> planting (2502°C) without<br />

considering the effect <strong>of</strong> mulching treatment. The marginal increase in accumulated Day<br />

temperature on the last date <strong>of</strong> planting compared to the third date <strong>of</strong> planting was probably<br />

due to exposure <strong>of</strong> both vegetative as well as reproductive stages <strong>of</strong> the last planting to a<br />

continuous rise in both daily maximum and minimum temperatures. Irrespective <strong>of</strong> planting<br />

dates, the highest Day temperature accumulation from planting to physiological maturity was<br />

observed under black polythene (3064°C), followed by rice straw (2955°C) and non-mulched<br />

treatment (2782°C Day). The lower coefficient <strong>of</strong> variation <strong>of</strong> Day temperature accumulation<br />

to attain any maturity as compared with GDD is the indication <strong>of</strong> the efficiency <strong>of</strong> Day<br />

temperature as a better thermal index.<br />

The heat use efficiency (HUE) for fruit yield was influenced by both dates <strong>of</strong> planting and<br />

mulching treatments. Irrespective <strong>of</strong> mulching treatments, HUE for fruit yield ranged from 1.3<br />

to 5.2 kg ha -1 °C -1 , respectively. Relatively higher HUE recorded under the second date <strong>of</strong><br />

planting as compared to later dates <strong>of</strong> plantings was possibly due to higher fruit yield in the<br />

crop planted on 14th November. Perhaps for the same region, HUE for both biomass and fruit<br />

yields was highest under black polythene (5.4 and 3.6 kg ha -1 °C -1 ) mulch as compared to rice<br />

straw (4.9 and 3. kg ha -1 °C -1 ) and non-mulched condition (3.6 and 2.3 kg ha -1 °C -1 ).<br />

Correlation studies between crop growth parameters and fruit yield, and thermal indices<br />

(Thermal time, Day temperature, and Heat use efficiency) confirmed the existence <strong>of</strong> a<br />

significant and positive correlation between fruit yield and thermal indices. Therefore, these<br />

indices can be utilized for developing equations for predicting the fruit yield <strong>of</strong> the tomato.<br />

Ecosystem based approaches for climate change adaptation, ecosystem services, integrated farming system<br />

models, Land degradation neutrality<br />

205 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

References<br />

Anonymous. 2018. FAO Database: February, 2018. FAO, Rome, Italy.<br />

Ham, J.M., Kluitenberg, G.J. and Lamont, W.J. 1993. Optical properties <strong>of</strong> plastic mulches<br />

affect the field temperature regime. J. American Soc. Hort. Sci. 118: 188-193.<br />

Medhi, K., Neog, P., Goswami, B., Deka, R.L. and Hussain, R. (2019). Agrometeorological<br />

Indices in Relation to Phenology and Yield <strong>of</strong> Rice genotype (Oryza sativa L.) under<br />

Upper Brahmaputra Valley Zone <strong>of</strong> Assam. Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. App. Sci. 8(06): xxxx.<br />

doi: https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2019.806.xx<br />

Naika, S., Jeude, J., G<strong>of</strong>fau, M., Hilmi, M. and Dam, B. 2019. Cultivation <strong>of</strong> tomato<br />

production, processing and marketing. ISBN Agromisa: 90-8573-039-2 ISBN CTA: 92-<br />

9081-299-0.<br />

Teasdale, J.R. and Mohler, C.L. 1993. Light transmittance, soil temperature, and soil moisture<br />

under residue <strong>of</strong> hairy vetch and rye. Agron. J. 85: 673-680.<br />

Venkatraman, S. 1968. Climatic consideration in cropping pattern Proc. symposium on New<br />

cropping pattern in India. ICAR, New Delhi, pp. 251-260.<br />

T2-24P-1472<br />

Natural Resource Management in Rapeseed, Field pea and Lentil under<br />

Senapati District<br />

Dipin Wangkheimayum, N. Jyotsna and R.S. Telem<br />

Krishi Vigyan Kendra-Senapati, Manipur, India<br />

This survey was conducted during the year 2011-19 on NHM <strong>of</strong> three selected crops at<br />

different villages <strong>of</strong> Senapati. In this paper, we studied the natural resource management <strong>of</strong><br />

some selected agronomical crops viz., Rapeseed var. TS-36, Pea var. Aman and Lentil var.<br />

HUL57 to demonstrate their economics. We found that, yield <strong>of</strong> rapeseed, pea and lentil were<br />

7.12 q ha -1 ; 13.62 q ha -1 and 6.96 q ha -1 respectively. The gross cost <strong>of</strong> rapeseed, pea and lentil<br />

were reported as Rs.16900; 46000 and 32446 respectively. Highest net income was found in<br />

Pea var. Aman which was Rs 22100 and lowest was 11580 in rapeseed var. TS-36. The BCR<br />

for the crops rapeseed var-36, field Pea var. Aman and lentil var. HUL57 were found to be<br />

1:68:1; 1.48:1 and 1.5:1 respectively. During the year 2011-2018, we conducted the various<br />

intervention programmes viz., mulching with crop residue and sawdust <strong>of</strong> rabi crops; farm<br />

ponds construction and renovation; stone lining wall; and vermiculture and composting unit,<br />

mulching with paddy straw and crop residues; azolla cultivation; jalkund ro<strong>of</strong> rain water<br />

206 | Page<br />

Ecosystem based approaches for climate change adaptation, ecosystem services, integrated farming system models, Land<br />

degradation neutrality


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

harvesting structure; zero tillage <strong>of</strong> rapeseed; check dam construction; open well development;<br />

minimum tillage <strong>of</strong> rapeseed var. TS-36; field pea var. Aman; and lentil var. HUL-57. In these<br />

intervention programmes; number <strong>of</strong> beneficiaries ranges from 2-14 were benefited by<br />

adopting the various programme mentioned above which were provided by the KVK Senapati<br />

for the socioeconomic sustainability.<br />

T2-25P-1482<br />

Assessment <strong>of</strong> Pr<strong>of</strong>itable Intercropping System for Alfisols Under Dryland<br />

Condition in Eastern Dry Zone <strong>of</strong> Karnataka<br />

Mudalagiriyappa., B.G. Vasanthi, K. M. Puneetha, M. Madan Kumar, H.S. Latha, and<br />

K. Devaraja<br />

All India Co-ordinated Research Project for Dryland Agriculture, UAS, GKVK, Bengaluru<br />

Intercropping in the dryland areas ensures better utilization <strong>of</strong> all growth resources. The soils <strong>of</strong><br />

the drylands are not only thirsty but also hungry. So, to replenish nutrient pool, conservation <strong>of</strong><br />

soil and water and stability in yield, intercropping systems are necessary for the dryland<br />

conditions/areas. The experiment consists <strong>of</strong> assessing the finger millet, pigeonpea and<br />

groundnut along with suitable intercrops. The different intercropping yields were converted<br />

into the finger millet equivalent yield.<br />

Methodology<br />

The experimental field study was conducted at the AICRP for dryland agriculture, Bengaluru<br />

for three consecutive kharif seasons (2017-2019) to determine the pr<strong>of</strong>itable intercropping<br />

system for the red soils in the Eastern Dry Zone <strong>of</strong> the Karnataka under the dryland condition.<br />

In the Eastern Dry Zone <strong>of</strong> Karnataka, the most predominant intercropping systems are viz.,<br />

Ragi, Pigeon pea, Groundnut, Maize and Castor based intercropping systems for Alfisols under<br />

dryland situations. The cereal- legume interaction helps both the crops in their growth behavior<br />

and inputs requirements leading to improvement and efficient utilization <strong>of</strong> resources like<br />

nutrient, moisture, light and thereby increases productivity with enhancement <strong>of</strong> soil health by<br />

taking advantages <strong>of</strong> biological nitrogen fixation by the legumes. The experiment comprised <strong>of</strong><br />

10treatments. viz, T 1: sole Finger millet, T 2: sole Pigeon pea, T 3: sole Groundnut, T 4: Finger<br />

millet + pigeonpea (DS with BRG-5 variety), T5: Finger millet + pigeonpea (TP with BRG-5<br />

variety), T6: Finger millet + akkadi, T7:Pigeonpea (BRG-1) + soybean (1:1), T8: Pigeonpea<br />

(BRG -2) + cowpea (1:1), T 9: Pigeonpea (BRG-2) + field bean (1:1) and T 10: Groundnut<br />

(ICGV-91114) + pigeonpea (BRG-5) (8:2). The crops were sown during kharif, finger millet<br />

sown during month <strong>of</strong> July, pigeonpea in the month <strong>of</strong> May, cowpea, soyabean and fieldbean<br />

in the month <strong>of</strong> May, groundnut in the month <strong>of</strong> June. The plot size <strong>of</strong> 3 m × 5m was adopted.<br />

The varieties used were; finger millet (MR-6), pigeonpea (BRG-2 and BRG-5), groundnut<br />

(variety ICGV 91114), Soyabean (Hardy), cowpea(IT 38956-1), fieldbean (HA-4).Akkadi crops<br />

Ecosystem based approaches for climate change adaptation, ecosystem services, integrated farming system<br />

models, Land degradation neutrality<br />

207 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

comprised <strong>of</strong> mixture <strong>of</strong> fieldbean, cowpea, pigeonpea and mustard, and the recommended<br />

dose <strong>of</strong> fertilizer for finger millet was 50:40:37.5 kgha -1 ;pigeonpea, 25:50:25; groundnut,<br />

25:50:25; both for sole and intercropping system. For pigeonpea transplanted seedlings were<br />

raised in polythene cover during (May) and transplanted during July (45 days old seedling).<br />

Evaluation <strong>of</strong> the cropping system was carried out by using the following indices,<br />

Production efficiency: Production effieciency (PE) (kg/day) =<br />

System pr<strong>of</strong>itability: System pr<strong>of</strong>itability =<br />

<br />

<br />

Relative economic efficiency (REE):REE (%) = <br />

<br />

improved/diversified system; ENR- net returns in the existing system<br />

Finger millet equivalent yield (FMEY):<br />

Results<br />

()<br />

()<br />

× 100 where, DNR- net returns obtained under<br />

Yield <strong>of</strong> intercrop × price <strong>of</strong> inter crop<br />

FMEY = yield <strong>of</strong> main crop +<br />

price <strong>of</strong> main crop<br />

The different intercropping yields were converted into the finger millet equivalent yield.<br />

Among the different intercropping systems, comparing with finger millet based intercropping<br />

systems transplanted finger millet intercropped with pigeonpea(T5) recorded higher finger<br />

millet equivalent yield <strong>of</strong> 3946 kg ha -1 followed by finger millet + pigeonpea (Direct sown)<br />

(T 4) with FMEY (3284 kg ha -1 ). There was nearly 20.80 % and 4.84 % increase in yield over<br />

sole finger millet (T1)(3125 kg ha -1 ) . The higher yield attributes in finger millet might be due<br />

to the intercropping with pigeonpea, which could be ascribed to the ability <strong>of</strong> pigeonpea to fix<br />

atmospheric nitrogen, slow growth <strong>of</strong> pigeon pea in the initial period, better moisture<br />

conservation and also transplanting finger millet, resulted in good crop growth and<br />

establishment. These results were in conformity with findings <strong>of</strong> Anchal das and Sudhishri<br />

(2010). The better result was also due to the drought tolerance mechanisms <strong>of</strong> finger millet<br />

which showed noble yield under inconsistent rains during the cropping period. Among<br />

pigeonpea based intercropping system, higher finger millet equivalent yield <strong>of</strong> 1805 kg ha -1<br />

was recorded in T9 than sole pigeonpea T2(1163 kg ha -1 ). There was 35 % increase in yield in<br />

T 9. The increase in yield advantage was noticed when the component crops in an intercropping<br />

system do not compete for the same ecological riches and the interspecific competition for a<br />

given resources is weaker than the intraspecific competition. The bigger complementary effects<br />

and yield advantages occur when the component crops have different growing periods so as<br />

their major demands on resources varies with time (Ofori and Steen 1981) which was clearly<br />

seen under pigeonpea based intercropping system. Similarly, with respect to groundnut based<br />

intercropping system higher yield advantage was noticed in T 10 compared to growing sole<br />

ground nut (T3) (995 kg ha -1 ). The increase in yield <strong>of</strong> groundnut with pigeonpea as intercrop<br />

208 | Page<br />

Ecosystem based approaches for climate change adaptation, ecosystem services, integrated farming system models, Land<br />

degradation neutrality


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

was due to better use <strong>of</strong> environmental resources showing that crops with different maturity<br />

express the maximum demand for nutrients and moisture, aerial space and light and could be<br />

suitably intercropped (Enyi, 1977). With respect to the system pr<strong>of</strong>itability <strong>of</strong> the different<br />

intercropping system grown under the dryland conditions, T 5recorded higher system<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>itability 214 Rs. /ha/day followed by direct sown Finger millet + pigeonpea (170<br />

Rs/ha/day) and sole finger millet (165 Rs./ha/day). With respect to relative economic efficiency<br />

(%) higher relative economic efficiency 34.43 %, 461.69 % and 582.08 % was observed in<br />

T5[Finger millet+ Pigeonpea (TP)], T9 [Pigeonpea+field bean (1:1)] and T10[Groundnut+<br />

Pigeonpea(8:2)] over their sole crops. Intercropping assures more efficient utilization <strong>of</strong> the<br />

resources and higher productivity compared with each sole crop <strong>of</strong> the mixture (Mucheru-muna<br />

et al. 2010). Increase in system pr<strong>of</strong>itability and relative efficiency % increase was due to<br />

better utilization <strong>of</strong> growth resources such as light, water and nutrients which was absorbed and<br />

converted into biomass by the intercrop over time and space.<br />

References<br />

Anchal das and Sudhishri, S., 2010, Intercropping in finger millet (Eleusinecoracana) with pulses for<br />

enhanced productivity, resource conservation and soil fertility in uplands <strong>of</strong> Southern Orissa.<br />

Indian J. Agon., 55(2): 89-94.<br />

Andrews, D.J. and Kassam, A.H. 1976. The importance <strong>of</strong> multiple cropping in increasing world food<br />

supplies. In: Papendick RI, Sanchez PA, Triplett GB (eds) Multiple Cropping. ASA Special<br />

Publication 27, American Science <strong>of</strong> Agronomy, Madison, WI, USA.<br />

Enyi, V.A.C. 1977. Grain yield in groundnut, Exp. Agric., 13: 101-110.<br />

Ofori, F. and Stern, W.R. 1987. Cereal-legume intercropping system, Adv in Agronomy, 41: 41-90.<br />

Yield, economics, RWUE, Production efficiency as influenced by the different<br />

intercropping system (pooled data <strong>of</strong> 3 years)<br />

Treatments<br />

Main<br />

crop<br />

(kg/ha)<br />

Inter<br />

crop<br />

(kg/ha)<br />

FMEY<br />

(kg/ha)<br />

Rain water use<br />

efficiency<br />

(kg ha-mm -1 )<br />

Production<br />

efficiency<br />

(kg day -1 )<br />

Net<br />

returns<br />

(Rs. ha -1 )<br />

T1 3125 - 3125 6.39 28.41 60095<br />

T2 593 - 1163 1.63 10.57 4749<br />

T3 798 - 995 2.01 9.05 -7280<br />

T4 2829 243 3284 6.82 29.85 62077<br />

T5 3379 300 3946 8.15 35.88 78266<br />

T6 2640 127 2828 5.71 25.71 46643<br />

T7 698 100 1391 1.84 12.65 10322<br />

T8 684 151 1457 1.93 13.25 11589<br />

T9 650 362 1805 2.42 16.41 21045<br />

T10 1310 143 1872 3.10 17.02 13820<br />

Ecosystem based approaches for climate change adaptation, ecosystem services, integrated farming system<br />

models, Land degradation neutrality<br />

209 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

S.Em± 153.31 0.40 1.39<br />

CD (0.05) 455.50 1.19 4.14<br />

* FMEY: finger millet equivalent yield<br />

T2-26P-1497<br />

Impact <strong>of</strong> Improved Practices in Rainfed Integrated Farming System on<br />

System Productivity and Employment Generation <strong>of</strong> Rainfed Farmers in<br />

Tumkuru District <strong>of</strong> Karnataka<br />

H. S. Latha, Mudalagiriyappa., K. Devaraja, M. Madan Kumar, B. G. Vasanthi, and K.<br />

M. Puneetha<br />

All India Co-ordinated research Project for Dryland Agriculture, UAS, GKVK,<br />

Bengaluru-560 065, Karnataka<br />

In Karnataka, the majority <strong>of</strong> farmers are small land holders having less than two hectares.<br />

These farmers generally practice subsistence farming, where they need to produce a<br />

continuous, reliable and balanced supply <strong>of</strong> food, as well as cash for basic needs and recurrent<br />

farm expenditure. Several methods <strong>of</strong> integrated farming system for bringing sustainability <strong>of</strong><br />

irrigated ecosystem with ample data were developed. However, the research data base on IFS<br />

for rainfed ecosystem is meagre. Further, changing climate is devastating the sustainability <strong>of</strong><br />

the fragile ecosystem. Also, the future food security in the country largely depends on the<br />

vertical expansion <strong>of</strong> allied activities in the rainfed ecosystem. Hence, the research for<br />

developing appropriate proportion <strong>of</strong> different components <strong>of</strong> IFS to rainfed ecosystem gains<br />

momentum. The research is implemented with the objectives<br />

1. To develop efficient, economically viable and environmentally sustainable IFS modules<br />

2. On-farm assessment/refinement/ strengthening <strong>of</strong> traditional rainfed farming systems with<br />

improved rainfed technologies<br />

3. To optimize on-farm integration <strong>of</strong> farm enterprises for enhanced farm incomes, resource/<br />

input use efficiencies and employment opportunities<br />

Methodology<br />

The IFS villages have been selected in two blocks <strong>of</strong> Tumkur district viz.,Koratagare block:<br />

Elerampura, Vagginakurike and Pataganahalli<strong>of</strong> Koratagare taluk, Tumakuru district as block-<br />

I villages; and Tumakuru block: Seethakallu, Kalenahalli and Gidaganahalli <strong>of</strong> Tumkur taluk,<br />

Tumkur district as block-II villages.Among the six villages Kalenahallivillage <strong>of</strong> Tumkur<br />

taluk, Tumkur district was selected as study area under Eastern Dry Zone (Zone-5) <strong>of</strong><br />

Karnataka. The study area is located at 13 º 18̍̍ 38"N Latitude, 77 º 16̍̍ 30"E Longitude and at a<br />

distance <strong>of</strong> about 80 km from GKVK campus. The selection <strong>of</strong> farmers based on the farming<br />

situation, farming system and farmer’scategory .<br />

210 | Page<br />

Ecosystem based approaches for climate change adaptation, ecosystem services, integrated farming system models, Land<br />

degradation neutrality


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Based on the survey, technical interventions have been taken up under different themes as<br />

follows: NRM module: In-situ moisture conservation between paired rows <strong>of</strong> pigeon pea,<br />

Contour cultivation, Mechanization: Sowing through Bullock drawn seed drill and weeding by<br />

cycle weeder; Improved varieties: Finger millet (MR-1, GPU-28, ML-365), Groundnut (ICGV-<br />

91114, KCG-6, K-6, K-1812) and Pigeonpea (BRG-5, BRG-2); Intercropping system: Finger<br />

millet + Pigeonpea (8:2), Groundnut + Pigeonpea (8:2), Pigeonpea + Field bean (1:1) and<br />

Cowpea + Field bean (1:1); Fodder module: Fodder maize (SA-tall), Fodder sorghum, Napier<br />

multi-cut (CO-5); Perennial module: Melia dubia and tamarind has been introduced; Animal<br />

module: Deworming 5-10 mg/kg <strong>of</strong> body weight (40ml /cow), Dry fodder: 5-7 kg/day/animal,<br />

Green fodder: 25-30 kg/day/animal, Concentrates (Energy source: protein source: bran in<br />

50:25:25 ratio): 4 kg/day/animal, Perethrin soap, Hi-min- Multi mineral nutrient mixture<br />

(40g/animal/day)<br />

Results<br />

Among the different farmers category irrespective <strong>of</strong> different modules and farming situation<br />

there is considerable improvement in system productivity (6567 kg/farming system) and<br />

employment generation (343) in improved practices than the traditional farmers practice (4367<br />

kg/farming system and 309, respectively) in marginal farmers category. Similarly, in small<br />

farmer’s category higher system productivity (9321 kg/farming system) and employment<br />

generation (351) was recorded in improved technological interventions than existing farmers<br />

practices under rainfed farming situation. Further, under partially irrigated situation higher<br />

system productivity (11909 kg/farming system and 14397 kg/farming system) and employment<br />

generation (366- and 411-man days) was registered in improved practices both in marginal and<br />

small farmer’s category, respectively (Mudalagiriyappa et al., 2017 and Ramachandrappa et<br />

al., 2017). Further there was an increase in yield was noticed from 30 - 40 % and increase in<br />

net return from 33 - 45 % both in rainfed and partially irrigated farming situation.<br />

Conclusion<br />

Integrated farming practices viz., in-situ moisture conservation between paired rows <strong>of</strong> pigeon<br />

pea, sowing through bullock drawn seed drill and weeding by cycle weeder, using <strong>of</strong> improved<br />

finger millet, groundnut and pigeonpea varieties and implementation <strong>of</strong> mineral mixture for<br />

animals has enhanced the system productivity (kg/farming system) employment generation<br />

(man days) and in improved practices than traditional practices followed by farmers. The<br />

demonstrations also served as tools for up scaling the technologies to the surrounding farmers,<br />

extension functionaries and policy makers<br />

References<br />

Mudalagiriyappa., Ramachandrappa, B.K., Thimmegowda, M.N., Devraja, K., Krishnamurthy,<br />

R., Ravindra Chary, G., Puneetha, K.M., Savitha, M. S., Narayan Hebbal and Shree<br />

Ecosystem based approaches for climate change adaptation, ecosystem services, integrated farming system<br />

models, Land degradation neutrality<br />

211 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Harsha Kumar, S. S., 2017, Dryland technologies at farmer doorstep- A Real line at<br />

Baichenahalli, Tumakuru District. All India Co-ordinated Research Project for Dryland<br />

Agriculture, Directorate <strong>of</strong> Research, University <strong>of</strong> Agricultural Sciences, Bangalore,<br />

Karnataka, p.84.<br />

Ramachandrappa, B. K., Dhanapal, G. N., Mariraju, H., Indrakumar, N., Jagadeesh B. N.and<br />

Balakrishna Reddy, P. C., 2011, Dryland technologies for alfisols <strong>of</strong> Southern dry<br />

region <strong>of</strong> Karnataka and success stories. All India Co-ordinated Research Project for<br />

Dryland Agriculture, University <strong>of</strong> Agricultural Sciences, Bangalore 58 p.<br />

System productivity, employment generation and increase in yield (%) as influenced by<br />

improved technological interventions during 2020-21<br />

Farmer’s<br />

category<br />

Existing<br />

farmers<br />

practice<br />

Improved<br />

practice<br />

System productivity<br />

(kg/farming system)<br />

(FMEY)*<br />

Increase<br />

in yield<br />

(%)<br />

Rainfed<br />

Increase<br />

in<br />

Net<br />

returns<br />

(%)<br />

Existing<br />

farmers<br />

practice<br />

Improved<br />

practice<br />

Employment generation<br />

(man-days)<br />

Marginal 4367 6567 31.42 41.31 309 343<br />

Small 5737 9321 38.29 44.66 316 351<br />

Partially Irrigated<br />

Marginal 7837 11909 34.36 42.64 319 366<br />

Small 10146 14397 30.62 33.41 358 411<br />

T2-27P-1511<br />

Livestock Interventions as an Additional Source <strong>of</strong> Income to Rainfed<br />

Farmers <strong>of</strong> Ananthapuramu District, Andhra Pradesh<br />

K. Madhavi 1 , K. Sudha Rani 1 , B. Chandana 1 , V. Sivajyothi 1 , M. Ravi Kishore 1 , K. Naveen<br />

Kumar 1 , Malleswari Sadhineni 1 , J.V. Prasad 2 and J.V.N.S. Prasad 3<br />

1 Acharya NG Ranga Agricultural University, Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Reddipalli, AP – 515 701<br />

2 ICAR-ATARI, CRIDA campus, Hyderabad – 500 059<br />

3<br />

ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad – 500 059<br />

Ananthapuramu is one <strong>of</strong> the drought prone districts <strong>of</strong> Andhra Pradesh particularly in southern<br />

India. The district secures least rainfall when compared to other districts <strong>of</strong> Rayalaseema<br />

region and other parts <strong>of</strong> Andhra Pradesh too. As the water is a scarce commodity, livestock<br />

suffered from lack <strong>of</strong> green grass and fodder.<br />

212 | Page<br />

Ecosystem based approaches for climate change adaptation, ecosystem services, integrated farming system models, Land<br />

degradation neutrality


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Methodology<br />

Demonstration <strong>of</strong> establishment <strong>of</strong> improved fodder varieties, area specific mineral mixture,<br />

urea molasses blocks and backyard poultry rearing as an additional source <strong>of</strong> income<br />

generation were demonstrated to the farmers <strong>of</strong> NICRA adopted villages.<br />

Results<br />

Improved Fodder Varieties<br />

The correct amount and proportion <strong>of</strong> dry fodder, green fodder, and nutrients should be<br />

included in the animals’ balanced diet. Animals get the nutritional components they need for<br />

physical growth and milk production from green grass in general. As rainfall is chief constraint<br />

in Ananthapuramu district, even the dry fodder availability from crop residues is less due to<br />

less yield <strong>of</strong> majority <strong>of</strong> rainfed agriculture crops in this area. Hence, farmers are made aware<br />

<strong>of</strong> the perennial multicut fodder varieties (Super Napier &fodder sorghum) with high protein<br />

and crude fibre availability in the improved fodder varieties (Kabirizi et al., 2003). Farmers<br />

were distributed with Super Napier fodder slips &fodder sorghum seed from 2018 to 2021,<br />

green fodder was made available to animals through-out the year with an average yield <strong>of</strong> 167<br />

t/ha <strong>of</strong> fodder and thereby increasing the productive performance over that <strong>of</strong> locally available<br />

fodder with an average yield <strong>of</strong> 118 t/ha.<br />

Regional Specific Mineral Mixture<br />

Minerals are required by dairy animals for their metabolic functions, growth, milk production,<br />

reproduction and health. Animal cannot synthesize minerals inside its body and usually feeds<br />

and fodders fed to the dairy animals do not provide all the minerals in the required quantity<br />

(Sahoo et al., 2017). Therefore, animal should be supplemented with adequate amount <strong>of</strong> good<br />

quality mineral mixture in their ration. Level <strong>of</strong> minerals in feeds and fodder varies from region<br />

to region, thus mineral availability to the animal also varies. So, it is necessary to produce<br />

region specific mineral mixture accordingly. Area specific mineral mixture <strong>of</strong> 2kg each was<br />

supplied to 30 farmers every year from 2018-2021 in NICRA adopted villages, monitored the<br />

% increase in milk yield, fat and SNF% for a period <strong>of</strong> 60 days interval. The mean average<br />

milk yield, SNF% & Fat% recorded in the treatment group supplied with RSMM was 3.57<br />

l/day, 8.35% & 3.5% over the control group fed without supplementation <strong>of</strong> RSMM with<br />

recorded parameters <strong>of</strong> 2.90 l/day, 7.8% & 2.9%, respectively.<br />

Urea Molasses Mineral Blocks<br />

The principal forages used in India for livestock feeding are low in nitrogen, minerals and<br />

vitamins resulting in low productivity. To overcome this strategic nutrient supplementation is<br />

essential in this scenario to improve the use <strong>of</strong> poor-quality roughage. The Urea Molasses<br />

Mineral Block (UMMB) was developed at NDDB and supplementation <strong>of</strong> UMMB can show<br />

Ecosystem based approaches for climate change adaptation, ecosystem services, integrated farming system<br />

models, Land degradation neutrality<br />

213 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

promising effects on productivity <strong>of</strong> animals. UMMB supplementation significantly increases<br />

feed intake, milk yield and growth rate and is therefore a cost-effective. UMMB provides<br />

fermentable nitrogen, energy and minerals necessary for optimum microbial growth. Molasses<br />

is noted for its sugar content and urea is a non-protein nitrogen compound (Rajesh Singh,<br />

2021). The UMMB supplementation in feed <strong>of</strong> Ruminants was carried out in NICRA adopted<br />

villages from 2018 to 2021. Feeding <strong>of</strong> UMMB to animals led in the marked increase in mean<br />

% <strong>of</strong> SNF (8.35%), milk yield (3.6 l/day) over that <strong>of</strong> the control group fed without<br />

supplementation <strong>of</strong> mineral blocks with mean % <strong>of</strong> SNF (7.93%), milk yield (2.95 l/day).<br />

Backyard Poultry Rearing<br />

Livestock and poultry provide a major contribution to India’s economy. In rural economy<br />

poultry farming contributes an important role especially for the socio-economic development<br />

<strong>of</strong> the weaker section <strong>of</strong> the society in India (Vermaet al., 2020). It generates self-employment,<br />

provides supplementary income and supplements protein rich diet at relatively low cost. In the<br />

state, the source <strong>of</strong> egg and meat production is mostly from exotic layers and broilers as well as<br />

the traditional local breeds. The high yielding layers and broilers cannot survive under suboptimal<br />

nutritional and managerial condition within stressful environment. The local breeds are<br />

very low productive with laying capacity <strong>of</strong> 20-30 eggs per year and very slower growth. These<br />

breeds are replaced with superior breeds phenotypically similar to existing poultry population<br />

& can acclimatize local climatic conditions. Under the NICRA project 60 rural women from<br />

NICRA adopted villages every year are supplied with kadaknath breed <strong>of</strong> poultry birds (10<br />

each) with good egg & meat production from which self-employment has been created by<br />

generation <strong>of</strong> additional income to women through sale <strong>of</strong> eggs & meat.<br />

References<br />

Sahoo, B., Kumar, R., Garg, A. K., Mohanta, R. K., Agarwal, A & Sharma, A. K. 2017. Effect<br />

<strong>of</strong> supplementing area specific mineral mixture on productive performance <strong>of</strong> crossbred<br />

cows. Ind. J. Ani. Nut., 34(4): 414-419.<br />

Rajesh Singh. 2021. Urea molasses mineral blocks as a feed supplement.<br />

Pashudhan Praharee Kabirizi, J., Muyekho, F., Mulaa, M., Nampijja, Z., Kawube, G., Namazzi,<br />

C and Alicai, T. 2017. Napier grass feed resource: production, constraints and<br />

implications for smallholder farmers in east and Central Africa. Environ Res.<br />

Verma, L. P., Sonkar, N., and Verma, C. 2020. Kadaknath chicken farming: Empowering<br />

Indian rural economy: A review. Breast, 16: 0-61.<br />

214 | Page<br />

Ecosystem based approaches for climate change adaptation, ecosystem services, integrated farming system models, Land<br />

degradation neutrality


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Impact <strong>of</strong> supplementation <strong>of</strong> RSMM on productive performance <strong>of</strong> animals<br />

Year Benefited Avg. milk<br />

yield l/day<br />

Avg.<br />

SNF%/day<br />

Avg.<br />

Fat%/day<br />

Income Generated/<br />

month<br />

No.<strong>of</strong><br />

Farmers<br />

No.<strong>of</strong><br />

Animals<br />

FP+<br />

RSMM<br />

FP<br />

FP+<br />

RSMM<br />

FP<br />

FP+<br />

RSMM<br />

FP<br />

FP+<br />

RSMM<br />

2018-19 30 30 3.5 2.9 8.4 8.0 3.8 3.0 4200/- 2610/-<br />

2019-20 10 30 3.6 3.0 8.4 7.6 3.5 2.8 4320/- 2700/-<br />

202--21 15 45 3.5 2.9 8.2 7.9 3.2 2.8 3885/- 3150/-<br />

2021-22 30 30 3.7 2.8 8.4 8.0 3.5 3.0 4440/- 3108/-<br />

Total/Mean 85 135 3.57 2.9 8.35 7.8 3.5 2.9 4212/- 2892/-<br />

FP<br />

-28P-1545<br />

Kadaknath Poultry Farming as an Emerging Way to Increase Farmer’s<br />

Income in Rainfed Farming Systems in Jhabua<br />

Chandan Kumar, I.S. Tomar and Anil Kumar Sharma<br />

Krishi Vigyan Kendra Jhabua, RVSKVV Gwalior (M.P)<br />

Animal husbandry is an integral component <strong>of</strong> rainfed farming systems and, is a significant<br />

revenue stream for farmers. The livestock including sheep, goat and poultry which are integral<br />

to many rainfed areas go unnoticed, or get lesser than deserving attention. To conserve the<br />

native breed which is adaptive to local environment and having good potential <strong>of</strong> income<br />

generation known for its black colour which is very rare and precious known as Kadaknath in<br />

India found in Jhabua district <strong>of</strong> M.P. The Kadaknath chicken meat from Jhabua district <strong>of</strong> M.P<br />

received GI Tag in ‘Meat products, poultry & poultry meat’ category. The meat & egg <strong>of</strong><br />

Kadaknath are rich source <strong>of</strong> Protein (21-24%) and lower source <strong>of</strong> Fat (1.96-2.6 %). Black<br />

meat <strong>of</strong> Kadaknath is very popular and delicious; its flesh is <strong>of</strong> higher value and is being used<br />

for the treatment <strong>of</strong> many human diseases by tribal living in Jhabua district. To maintain the<br />

purity <strong>of</strong> the birds and to increase their productive and reproductive efficiency, the scientific<br />

kadaknath production technology which includes balance diet, scheduled vaccination & proper<br />

medication as suggested by KVK Jhabuain NICRA adopted villageshas reduced the mortality<br />

rate from 50% to 10-12% and thus increases the survival percentage. The intervention <strong>of</strong><br />

feeding Azolla Microphylla to kadaknath birds in the adopted village <strong>of</strong> NICRA shows<br />

significant effect and performs much better than traditional rearing system in Jhabua. This<br />

intervention not only checks mortality but also increase their body weight when fed 5% extra<br />

from recommended dose <strong>of</strong> grower feeds to 1 month old kadaknath grower birds. The bird is<br />

gaining the body weight in faster way and attaining saleable body weight <strong>of</strong> 1.10 kg in 105-120<br />

days. This technology gave higher monetary return to farmers due to huge demand for<br />

Ecosystem based approaches for climate change adaptation, ecosystem services, integrated farming system<br />

models, Land degradation neutrality<br />

215 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Kadaknath in the Maharashtra, Gujrat, Rajasthan which encourages Kadaknath production in<br />

the district. The scientific Kadaknath production technology has potential to sustain among<br />

small or sub-marginal farmers.<br />

Methodology<br />

The experiment was done at farmer’s field <strong>of</strong> adopted village <strong>of</strong> KVK Jhabua at Chapri (Rama)<br />

as control, Hatyadeli (Meghnagar) as T 1 and Parwaliya (Thandla) as T 2 <strong>of</strong> KVK Jhabua. For<br />

production <strong>of</strong> Azolla plastic azolla kit was given to them were used <strong>of</strong> size (6 x 3) feet. In each<br />

pit 20 kg <strong>of</strong> soil poured and make a soil bed 1 -2 cm. thick evenly. Each pit filled with water up<br />

to the height <strong>of</strong> 15-20 cm. Around 2.5 kg. Old cow dung/vermin compost and 15 -20 gm. <strong>of</strong><br />

SSP mixed in 10 litre <strong>of</strong> water to make slurry and poured into water bed. Then added about<br />

100-150 g fresh A. Microphylla culture. Harvesting was done after 5 to 7 days and <strong>of</strong>fered to<br />

Kadaknath birds after harvesting washing was done with clean water.<br />

For experimental purpose kadaknath chicks were selected and reared under same diet and same<br />

condition and from same lot <strong>of</strong> parent birds after attaining their age <strong>of</strong> 1 month 600 grower<br />

kadaknath birds were selected which have equal shape and size and weight randomly and<br />

grouped into 3 groups using Randomized Block Design which is further divided in 2 sub<br />

groups or replicates with 200 chicks in each. Fresh Azolla culture were used (3’x6’ size) for<br />

experiments. In T 1 (control)Group (200) two hundred kadaknath birds were fed normal diet<br />

only which contains nutrients,T2 group were fed basal commercial diets along with @ 5% extra<br />

supplementary feed (fresh azolla on DM basis),and in T 3 group 5 % replacement <strong>of</strong> basal diets<br />

with fresh azolla (DM basis) were fed. All the diets (starter and finisher) were prepared as per<br />

BIS (1992). The growth rate, mortality rate was recorded periodically for all the three groups<br />

<strong>of</strong> the experiments and data recorded. Sufficient management conditions like floor space, light,<br />

temperature, ventilation and relative humidity were provided to each <strong>of</strong> the groups. During the<br />

experimental period, they were fed ad libitum on replicate basis and provided with clean and<br />

wholesome water. Data on Initial and final body weight gain was recorded. The data obtained<br />

were statistically assessed by the Analysis <strong>of</strong> Variance through SPSS (17.0) S<strong>of</strong>tware<br />

considering replicates as experimental units. Duncan’s multiple range test was used to test the<br />

significance `f difference between the differences <strong>of</strong> significant at 0.01 and 0.05 %.<br />

Results<br />

The growth performance <strong>of</strong> the grower kadaknath birds fed different levels <strong>of</strong> azolla meals is<br />

presented in the Table. Average final weight <strong>of</strong> the birds at 140 days show were significantly<br />

different in T2 group (p


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

for this decreased gain. Highest value for gain in live weight was exhibited in T 2 group whereas<br />

lowest value was recorded in the T1 group.<br />

Overall growth performance (gm/birds <strong>of</strong> Kadaknath birds (4 th to 42 nd week <strong>of</strong> age)<br />

Age <strong>of</strong> the Birds<br />

T 1 weight<br />

in(gm)Chapri<br />

T 2 weight in(gm)<br />

Hatyadeli<br />

T 3 weight in(gm)<br />

Parwaliya<br />

Initial body weight 169.0±0.5 183.0 ±0.5 180.0±1.5<br />

1 -2 Month 501.0 ± 3.6 512.0±1.4 507.0±3.4<br />

2 - 3 Month 1081.0±2.4 1201±3.8 1107.0±0.71<br />

3 - 4 Month 1102.0±3.4 1311.0±4.4 1205.0±2.6<br />

4 – 5 Month 1508.0±3.1 1618±4.7 1403.0±4.2<br />

Final body weight 1423.0±3.5 1680±3.9* 1583.0±4.5<br />

The mortality rate <strong>of</strong> kadaknath birds in T1, T2, and T3groups were 6 %, 2%, and 3%<br />

respectively which is reflects the promising effect <strong>of</strong> feeding <strong>of</strong> A Micropylla in Kadaknath<br />

birds as in these birds 10 % mortality in the intensive condition is considered normal. The table<br />

below shows the cost <strong>of</strong> rearing <strong>of</strong> the T1 group was found to be Rs-37600 because only 188<br />

birds survived whereas in the T 2 group despite feeding Azolla (Rs-5/birds) the cost comes to<br />

around Rs-38220 as only 4 birds died so input cost increased, and in T3 due to replacement <strong>of</strong><br />

feed cost comes around Rs-37830 only. The pr<strong>of</strong>it in the T 2 group <strong>of</strong> birds was found to be Rs-<br />

31200 more than the T 1 group which is quite impressive and justifies the rearing <strong>of</strong> kadaknath<br />

birds with Azolla.<br />

Groups<br />

No. <strong>of</strong> birds<br />

started with<br />

Economics <strong>of</strong> rearing <strong>of</strong> kadaknath birds (200)<br />

Mortality<br />

(No.)<br />

Input Cost<br />

(INR)<br />

Gross<br />

Return<br />

Net Return<br />

B:C<br />

Ratio<br />

T1 200 12 37600.00 131600.00 94000.00 3.5<br />

T2 200 04 38220.00 156800.00 118580.00 4.1<br />

T3 200 06 37830.00 145500.00 107670.00 3.8<br />

Conclusion<br />

The unorganized poultry sector which contributes around 20% <strong>of</strong> the total poultry population,<br />

Kadaknath is one <strong>of</strong> them reared by tribal as well as selected poultry growers. The palatability,<br />

digestibility, and potential to prevent birds from the disease are the main issues that need to be<br />

addressed in the changing climatic scenario which needs to be addressed. The rearing <strong>of</strong><br />

locally adopted birds like kadaknath and rearing with Azolla show synergistic effects on the<br />

bird’s performance and also increases the income <strong>of</strong> the farmers in all typologies.<br />

Ecosystem based approaches for climate change adaptation, ecosystem services, integrated farming system<br />

models, Land degradation neutrality<br />

217 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

T2-29P-1550<br />

Productivity and Pr<strong>of</strong>itability <strong>of</strong> Pigeon Pea–Vegetable Mustard–Okra<br />

Cropping System as Influenced by Enriched Organic Formulations<br />

Kamal Garg and Shiva Dhar<br />

ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, 110 012, India<br />

India has made spectacular breakthrough in production and consumption <strong>of</strong> fertilizers during<br />

last four decades. However, the imbalanced and continuous use <strong>of</strong> chemical fertilizers in<br />

intensive cropping system has led to reduction in the crop yields and resulted in imbalance <strong>of</strong><br />

nutrients in soil which has adverse effect on soil physico-chemical properties. Due to the<br />

dramatic rise in prices for commercial fertilizers, search for alternative sources <strong>of</strong> plant<br />

nutrients has become increasingly important, particularly for resource poor farmers <strong>of</strong> South<br />

Asia. Use <strong>of</strong> organics build up the soil humus improving the soil physical and biological<br />

properties. Therefore, organic nutrient management systems are needed to maintain agricultural<br />

productivity and protect the environment. Moreover, raw materials required to make FYM are<br />

easily available to farmers. The conversion <strong>of</strong> rice straw into value-added compost may have<br />

the potential to improve productivity <strong>of</strong> the crops and reduce environmental pollution as well<br />

as loss <strong>of</strong> plant nutrients and organic matter. Ashes from combustion <strong>of</strong> biomass are the oldest<br />

mineral fertilizers in the world. Biomass ashes are nearly free <strong>of</strong> N but contain significant<br />

quantities <strong>of</strong> P, K, Ca, Mg and micronutrients essential for plant nutrition (Bhattacharya et al.,<br />

2002). The potato peel manure is very useful for farmers because NPK content was gradually<br />

increased in the soil. The integration <strong>of</strong> organic manures and composts <strong>of</strong> residues <strong>of</strong> various<br />

crops available with farmers would be able to maintain soil fertility as well as sustain crop<br />

productivity. Hence, the present investigation was conducted with the objective to find out the<br />

effect <strong>of</strong> enriched organic formulations on productivity and pr<strong>of</strong>itability <strong>of</strong> pigeon pea–<br />

vegetable mustard–okra cropping system for achieving higher yield and economics.<br />

Methodology<br />

A field experiment was conducted during the rainy (kharif), winter (rabi) and summer seasons<br />

<strong>of</strong> 2020–21 and 2021–22 at the research farm <strong>of</strong> Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New<br />

Delhi. The experiment comprised <strong>of</strong> one cropping system (pigeon pea–vegetable mustard–<br />

okra) and seven nutrient sources viz., control, 100% RDN through FYM, 100% RDN through<br />

improved RRC, 100% RDN through PHA-based formulation, 75% RDN through PHA-based<br />

formulation, 100% RDN through PPC-based formulation and 75% RDN through PPC-based<br />

formulation were tested in randomized block design with three replications. The pigeon pea<br />

variety ‘Pusa Arhar 16’, vegetable mustard cultivar ‘Pusa sag 1’, and okra variety ‘Pusa Bhindi<br />

5’ were taken in the experiment. The RDN <strong>of</strong> pigeon pea, vegetable mustard, and okra were 30,<br />

80, and 100 kg N ha -1 respectively. Pigeon pea was sown in the first week <strong>of</strong> July and<br />

218 | Page<br />

Ecosystem based approaches for climate change adaptation, ecosystem services, integrated farming system models, Land<br />

degradation neutrality


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

harvested in the first week <strong>of</strong> November. Vegetable mustard was sown in the second week <strong>of</strong><br />

November and harvested in the third week <strong>of</strong> January. Okra was planted in the first week <strong>of</strong><br />

March and harvested in the second fortnight <strong>of</strong> May during both tears <strong>of</strong> experimentation. After<br />

harvesting, threshing, cleaning, and drying, the seed yield <strong>of</strong> crops was estimated. Economic<br />

yields <strong>of</strong> the component crops were converted to pigeon pea-equivalent yield (PPEY),<br />

considering the prevailing minimum support price (MSP)/market prices <strong>of</strong> the crops. System<br />

productivity was calculated by adding the PPEY <strong>of</strong> the component crops. Production efficiency<br />

in economic terms was calculated by taking system net returns and the B: C ratio. The data<br />

obtained from the study for two years were analyzed statistically using the F–test.<br />

Results<br />

The yield <strong>of</strong> component crops <strong>of</strong> the system expressed as pigeon pea equivalent yield (PPEY)<br />

under various enriched organic formulations. Among the treatments, the application <strong>of</strong> 100%<br />

RDN through PHA-based formulation registered significantly highest PPEY (8.70 t ha -1 and<br />

8.97 t ha -1 ) over other treatments which was statistically on par with 100% RDN through PPCbased<br />

formulation and FYM during both the years <strong>of</strong> study. However, the treatment receiving<br />

100% RDN through improved RRC were also found statistically similar to 75% RDN through<br />

PHA-based formulation and PPC-based formulation. The application <strong>of</strong> 100% RDN through<br />

PHA-based formulation increased the PPEY to the extent <strong>of</strong> 53.5 per cent during 2020-21 and<br />

55.0 per cent during 2021-22, respectively over control. This might be due to balanced supply<br />

<strong>of</strong> nutrients to the crops throughout the crop growth period as FYM undergo decomposition<br />

during which series <strong>of</strong> nutrient transformation takes place and helps in their higher availability<br />

to the crops. Higher uptake <strong>of</strong> nutrients by the crops will result in higher yield.<br />

Production economics <strong>of</strong> cropping systems under various enriched organic formulations have<br />

been presented in Table. Critical examination <strong>of</strong> data revealed that application <strong>of</strong> 100% RDN<br />

through PHA-based formulation gave significantly maximum system net returns and B: C ratio<br />

(Rs.553.6 x10 3 ha -1 and Rs.567.8 x10 3 ha -1 ; 4.96 and 4.94 during 2020–21 and 2021–22,<br />

respectively), which remained statistically similar to 100% RDN through PPC-based<br />

formulation and FYM during both the years. Higher returns under PHA-based formulation<br />

might be due to the higher yield obtained from FYM coupled with a relatively lower cost <strong>of</strong><br />

FYM during both years which had increased the net returns during both years.<br />

Conclusion<br />

Based on the results <strong>of</strong> the present study, it can be concluded that the application <strong>of</strong><br />

organic nutrient sources at 100% recommended dose <strong>of</strong> nitrogen through PHA-based<br />

formulation was found to be most effective in achieving higher productivity and pr<strong>of</strong>itability<br />

in pigeon pea–vegetable mustard–okra cropping system.<br />

Ecosystem based approaches for climate change adaptation, ecosystem services, integrated farming system<br />

models, Land degradation neutrality<br />

219 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

References<br />

Bhattacharya, S.S. and Chattopadhyay, G.N. 2002. Increasing bioavailability <strong>of</strong> phosphorus<br />

from fly ash through vermicomposting. J. Environ. Qual. 31(6): 2116–2119.<br />

Effect <strong>of</strong> enriched organic formulations on system productivity and economics <strong>of</strong> pigeon<br />

pea–vegetable mustard–okra cropping system<br />

Treatment<br />

Pigeon pea<br />

equivalent yield<br />

(PPEY, t ha -1 )<br />

Net returns<br />

(x10 3 ₹ ha -1 )<br />

B: C ratio<br />

2020-21 2021-22 2020-21 2021-22 2020-21 2021-22<br />

Control 6.09 6.31 356.8 368.3 4.10 4.10<br />

FYM 8.40 8.68 528.1 540.6 4.85 4.81<br />

Improved RRC 7.45 7.77 4465 464.7 3.94 4.03<br />

PHA based formulation (100%<br />

RDN) 8.70 8.97 553.6 567.8 4.96 4.94<br />

PHA based formulation (75% RDN) 7.33 7.67 447.1 466.4 4.26 4.29<br />

PPC based formulation (100% RDN) 8.50 8.77 537.0 550.3 4.89 4.85<br />

PPC based formulation (75% RDN) 7.17 7.42 432.3 445.7 4.20 4.18<br />

SEm ± 0.22 0.22 12.2 12.1 0.13 0.13<br />

LSD (P=0.05) 0.67 0.66 37.6 37.4 0.41 0.39<br />

FYM, Farm yard manure; RRC, Rice residue compost; PHA, Paddy husk ash; PPC, Potato peel compost<br />

T2-30P-1570<br />

Deep Liter Pig Housin- A Venture for Minimizing Winter Stress and other<br />

Health Managemental Issues in Piggery Farming in West Jaintia Hill<br />

District <strong>of</strong> Meghalaya<br />

Rimiki Suchiang, Dodo Paswet, Banylla Kharbamon, Alethea Dympep, Risakaru<br />

Lyngdoh, Marbiangdor Mawlong, Jaseama K. Marak and Firstborn Sutnga<br />

KVK Jaintia Hills, Moopun,Wahiajer<br />

West Jaintiahills , Meghalaya<br />

kvkjaintiahills@gmail.com<br />

Piggery farming is a growing industry in Meghalaya with pork being the most preferred meat<br />

in the state and <strong>of</strong>fers a major source <strong>of</strong> livelihood for most <strong>of</strong> the rural people. However, there<br />

are various constraints inhibiting the growth <strong>of</strong> this enterprise such as improper housing<br />

management and health management issues. in order to address this constraint, kvk jaintia hills<br />

since the year 2019 has taken up a technology on construction <strong>of</strong> deep liter pig shed in order to<br />

tackle winter stress in pigs by maintaining a comfort zone for the pigs which was well suited<br />

220 | Page<br />

Ecosystem based approaches for climate change adaptation, ecosystem services, integrated farming system models, Land<br />

degradation neutrality


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

for physiological adaptation during extreme weather events. The marketable body weight was<br />

80-90 kg and there is a reduction in lameness by 6.6%, skin diseases by 25.5 %, diarrhea by<br />

15.2% and respiratory problem by 7.2 %. The average temperature <strong>of</strong> the shed recorded during<br />

peak winter months was within the range <strong>of</strong> 20-23 o C<br />

T2-31P<br />

Indigenous Multi Cropping Systems <strong>of</strong> Rainfed Areas: A Present from the<br />

Past to the Future<br />

Prachi D. Patil, Swaran Viswanathan, Ravindra Adusumilli, Shailesh Vyas, Soumik<br />

Banerjee, Lokappa Nayak, K. Phaneesh, P. Vipindas, Shamika Mone, Tarak Kate,<br />

Siddhesh Sakore, Pramel Kumar, Ritesh Guage, Deepak Sharma, Luna Panda<br />

WASSAN, Hyderabad<br />

The unprecedented heat waves across wheat-growing areas and drought in Indo Gangetic<br />

Plains hit the exports <strong>of</strong> wheat and rice badly during the year 2022. These events have exposed<br />

the vulnerabilities <strong>of</strong> rice and wheat - India’s two major cereal crops to a changing climate.<br />

Experiences from the green revolution belts <strong>of</strong> Punjab and the Ingo Gangetic Plains draw our<br />

attention to the rainfed agriculture areas. Despite constituting about 68% and 48% <strong>of</strong> the<br />

cropped area under non-food and food crops, rainfed agriculture is yet to garner the public and<br />

policy maker's imagination. India’s traditional rainfed multi-cropping systems are more<br />

climate resilient. The inherent diversity and rich complementary crop combination- <strong>of</strong> cereals,<br />

millets, pulses, oilseeds, and vegetables, grown on the same piece <strong>of</strong> land at the same time<br />

inbuild resilience to climate variability.<br />

An exploratory research study on documenting traditional multi-crop systems was conducted<br />

under the University <strong>of</strong> Cambridge’s project <strong>of</strong> Transforming India's Green Revolution by<br />

Research and Empowerment for Sustainable food Supplies (TIGR2ESS) across nine states <strong>of</strong><br />

India in 2022. Twelve different traditional rainfed multi-cropping systems across eight<br />

agroecological zones were studied. The concept was to explore their potential in sustaining<br />

crop diversity and soil health, provisioning nutrition-rich food and feed, and climate resilience.<br />

These twelve systems are Kurwa (Jharkhand), Misa Chasa (Odisha), Navadhanya (Andhra<br />

Pradesh), Punam Krishi/Ponam Kuthu and Purayida Krishi (Kerala), Akkadi Salu (Karnataka),<br />

Baradhanya and Pata (Maharashtra), Olya and Sat Gajara (Madhya Pradesh), Rammol<br />

(Gujarat) and Hangari Kheti (Rajasthan).<br />

The mix <strong>of</strong> crops, their ratios, layout <strong>of</strong> the field, agronomic practices and flow <strong>of</strong> dietary<br />

nutrients to households, and their time trends was documented using multiple research methods.<br />

Ecosystem based approaches for climate change adaptation, ecosystem services, integrated farming system<br />

models, Land degradation neutrality<br />

221 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

T2-32P<br />

A Review Article on Comparative Performance <strong>of</strong> Vanaraja and Indigenous<br />

Chicken under Backyard System <strong>of</strong> Rearing<br />

Nunni Tayeng, Neeta Lengjam, S. M. Hussain and R.K. Salam*<br />

KVK-East Siang, CHF, CAU, Pasighat, Arunachal Pradesh, India<br />

* rubu28903@gmail.com<br />

Silluk is an interior most village <strong>of</strong> East Siang district with a 27 0 43 ’_ 29 0 20 ’ N latitude and94 0<br />

42 ’ -95 0 35 ’ E longitude with an elevation from 130 to 752 MSL. The population is nonvegetarian<br />

and prefers meat products in the diet. Furthermore, though indigenous birds are<br />

hardy, resistant to common avian disease and adopt well in adverse climatic condition, their<br />

productivity is much lower due to poor genetic potential, hence reducing the market potential<br />

as well as opportunity for extra income. Keeping these points in view KVK East Siang under<br />

NICRA project initiated an intervention <strong>of</strong> introducing backyard poultry rearing with Vanaraja,<br />

a dual-purpose high yielding chicken developed by Project Directorate <strong>of</strong> Poultry, Hyderabad<br />

and successfully introduced in various parts <strong>of</strong> our country. The information on performance <strong>of</strong><br />

the Vanaraja against indigenous birds in backyard rearing system is scarce and disorganized<br />

for the north eastern region, especially for subtropical regions like that <strong>of</strong> Silluk village in East<br />

Siang District <strong>of</strong> Arunachal Pradesh. However, KVK-East Siang, has successfully conducted<br />

Front Line demonstrations on Vanaraja birds in backyard systems in villages <strong>of</strong> East Siang<br />

District (APR; 2015-2016, 2016-2017 and 2019-2020) concluded farmers showed great<br />

satisfaction for Vanaraja Bird and also recommended to be popularized in every villages <strong>of</strong> the<br />

district. Additionally, in the state <strong>of</strong> Assam some comparative performance <strong>of</strong> Vanaraja and<br />

indigenous chicken under backyard system studies have revealed that overall mean body<br />

weight, egg production and egg weights were significantly higher in Vanaraja in compare to<br />

indigenous birds. Also, in states like Nagaland and Mizoram with similar sub-tropical agroecosystem,<br />

the studies to analyze the backyard poultry production system practiced by the<br />

tribal farmers found that the traditional free range poultry production can possibly be improved<br />

through the use <strong>of</strong> dual-purpose birds like Vanaraja. All these studies show that the present<br />

intervention to be concluded in Silluk Village has a promising result to look forward to.<br />

Directed Seeded Rice: Prospects, Constraints and Researchable Issue<br />

T2-33P<br />

Satyendra Pal Singh and Awdhesh Singh<br />

RVSKVV-Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Lahar (Bhind) M.P.<br />

Rice (Organ Sativa) is one <strong>of</strong> the most important food crops in the world and staple food for<br />

more than 50 percent <strong>of</strong> the global population. Being the major sources <strong>of</strong> food after wheat, it<br />

meets 43 percent <strong>of</strong> calorie requirement <strong>of</strong> more than two third <strong>of</strong> the Indian population. In<br />

222 | Page<br />

Ecosystem based approaches for climate change adaptation, ecosystem services, integrated farming system models, Land<br />

degradation neutrality


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

India rice is grown on an area <strong>of</strong> about 43.5 million ha with a total population <strong>of</strong> 105.5 MT and<br />

productivity <strong>of</strong> 2.4 tons per ha during 2014-15. Increasing water scarcity, water loving nation<br />

<strong>of</strong> rice cultivation and increasing labour wages triggers the search for alternative crop<br />

establishment method which can increase water productivity. In traditional rice cultivation, rice<br />

is sprouted in a nursery. Sprouted seedlings are then transplanted into standing water with<br />

direct seedling, rice seed is sown and sprouted directly into the field, eliminating the laborious<br />

process <strong>of</strong> planting seedlings by hand and greatly reducing the crops water requirement. Direct<br />

seeded crops require less labour and tend to mature faster than transplanted crops.<br />

Conventional method <strong>of</strong> rice growing which is not only intensive water user but also<br />

cumbersome and laborious. Different problems like lowering water table, scarcity <strong>of</strong> labour<br />

during peak periods, deteriorating soil health demands some alternative establishment method<br />

to sustain productivity <strong>of</strong> rice as well as natural resources direct seeded rice, the olds method <strong>of</strong><br />

crop establishment, is gaining popularity because <strong>of</strong> its low-input demand. It saves labour,<br />

requires less water, less drudgery, early crop maturity, low production cost, better soil physical<br />

conditions for following crops and less methane emission, provides better option to be the best<br />

fit in different cropping systems. There are several constraints associated with shift PTR to<br />

DSR, such as high weed infestation, evaluation <strong>of</strong> weedy rice, increase in soil borne pathogens,<br />

nutrient disorders, poor crop establishment, lodging, incidence <strong>of</strong> blast, brown leaf spot etc. by<br />

overcoming these constraints DSR can prone to be a very promising, technically and<br />

economically feasible alternative to PTR.<br />

Ecosystem-based Adaptation for Increased Agricultural Productivity<br />

through Smallholder Farmers in Ratlam District (M.P.)<br />

Gyanendra Pratap Tiwari, SarveshTripathy* and Jitendra Bhandari<br />

Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Jaora, Ratlam (M.P.)-457001<br />

*sarveshtripathy@gmail.com<br />

T2-34P<br />

The impacts <strong>of</strong> climate change are evident in the agriculture sector in India. These impacts are<br />

more severe and pronounced in a dry district like Ratlam due to the high reliance on agroeconomy<br />

and subsistence-based livelihoods by smallholder farmers that increase vulnerability<br />

and risks. This paper evaluated performance <strong>of</strong> BBF (Broad Bed Furrow), improved variety,<br />

soil test based nutrient management system and integrated pest and diseases management, by<br />

comparing their efficacy in terms <strong>of</strong> yield and reduction in disease pest problems.<br />

Methodology<br />

The trial was conducted in NICRA-adopted village <strong>of</strong> Ratlam district during 2020-21 and<br />

2021-22on farmer’s field in soybean, chickpea and wheat crop. Before and after comparisons<br />

Ecosystem based approaches for climate change adaptation, ecosystem services, integrated farming system<br />

models, Land degradation neutrality<br />

223 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

on various variables were obtained with the help <strong>of</strong> baseline data and recall memories <strong>of</strong><br />

respondents.<br />

Results<br />

The result was shows 25.93% yield increase in soybean due to introduction <strong>of</strong> extra early,<br />

thermo-insensitive, multiple resistant and high yielding variety JS-2034, over traditional<br />

practice with use <strong>of</strong> broad bed furrow (BBF) technology in Kharif season. Similarly in rabi<br />

season- heat tolerant, wilt resistance and high yielding variety chickpea variety RVG-202 has<br />

given higher yield <strong>of</strong> 19.8 % over traditional practice with use <strong>of</strong> BBF technology. Improved<br />

high yielding and heat tolerant wheat variety HI-1605 given higher yield <strong>of</strong> 23.57 %<br />

comparison to traditional variety LOK-1 with use <strong>of</strong> line show technology. These findings<br />

suggest that traditionally used practices have scientific basis and <strong>of</strong>fer simple, affordable and<br />

climate friendly practices to improve the health <strong>of</strong> agro-ecosystem while supporting<br />

smallholder farmers to adapt to adverse impacts <strong>of</strong> climate change and build socio-ecological<br />

resilience. These practices can be also customized depending on the local context for wider<br />

adoption and scaling. Similar result were also found by Aggarwal P. K. (2003), Das et al.<br />

(2012 & 2014), Jasna et al. (2017), Parry et al. (2017) and Sonune & Mane (2018).<br />

Impact <strong>of</strong> climate change on productivity <strong>of</strong> soybean, chickpea and wheat.<br />

Treatment Year Variety Seed Yield<br />

(Kg/ ha)<br />

Gross returns<br />

(Rs/ha)<br />

Net returns<br />

(Rs/ha)<br />

B:C ratio<br />

IP 2020-21 JS-2034 16.74 64951 38554 1.46<br />

FP 2020-21 Local 13.30 51604 27546 1.14<br />

IP 2021-22 JS-2034 15.48 61146 36428 1.47<br />

FP 2021-22 Local 12.31 48624 27412 1.29<br />

IP 2020-21 RVG-202 14.81 75531 52411 2.27<br />

FP 2020-21 Local 12.37 63087 40452 1.79<br />

IP 2021-22 RVG-202 14.68 76776 51436 2.03<br />

FP 2021-22 Local 12.26 64119 41578 1.84<br />

IP 2020-21 HI-1605 38.28 75603 47854 1.72<br />

FP 2020-21 LOK-1 30.98 61185 35478 1.38<br />

IP 2021-22 HI-1605 35.29 71109 45263 1.75<br />

FP 2021-22 LOK-1 28.56 57548 34145 1.46<br />

IP: Improved practice; FP: Farmers’ practice<br />

Conclusion<br />

Broad Bed and Furrow technique and stress tolerant cultivars can play an important role in<br />

coping with climate variability as well as enhancing the productivity. These findings suggest<br />

that traditionally used practices have scientific basis and <strong>of</strong>fer simple, affordable and climate<br />

224 | Page<br />

Ecosystem based approaches for climate change adaptation, ecosystem services, integrated farming system models, Land<br />

degradation neutrality


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

friendly practices to improve the health <strong>of</strong> agro-ecosystem while supporting smallholder<br />

farmers to adapt to adverse impacts <strong>of</strong> climate change and build socio-ecological resilience.<br />

These practices can be also customized depending on the local context for wider adoption and<br />

scaling.<br />

References<br />

Aggarwal, P. K. 2003. Impact <strong>of</strong> climate change on Indian agt1culture. J. Pl. Bio. 30: 189-98.<br />

Das, A., Patel, D.P., Munda, G.C., Ramkrushna, G.I., Kumar, M. and Ngachan, S.V. 2014.<br />

Improving productivity, water and energy use efficiency in lowland rice (Oryza sativa)<br />

through appropriate establishment methods and nutrient management practices in the<br />

mid-altitude <strong>of</strong> north-east India. Exp. Agric. 50(3): 353–375.<br />

Jasna, V.K., Burman, R.R., Padaria, R.N., Sharma, J.P., Varghese, E., Chakrabarti, B. and<br />

Dixit, S. 2017. Impact <strong>of</strong> climate resilient technologies in rainfed agroecosystem. Ind. J.<br />

Agric. Sci. 87(6): 816–824.<br />

Parry, M. L. and Carter, T.R. 1989. The impact <strong>of</strong> climate change on agriculture. In: Coping<br />

with Climate Change. Proceedings <strong>of</strong> the 2nd North American Conference on Preparing<br />

for Climate Change, Topping JC (ed). Climate Institute, Washington, DC, pp. 180–184.<br />

Sonune, S.V. and Mane, S.B. 2018. Impact <strong>of</strong> climate resilient varieties on crop productivity<br />

in NICRA village. J. Pharmacog. Phytochem. 1(special): 3210-3212.<br />

Wezel, A., Casagrande, M., Celette, F., Vian, J.F., Ferrer, A. and Peigne, J. 2014.<br />

Agroecological practices for sustainable agriculture- a review. Agron. Sust. Dev. 34: 1–<br />

20.<br />

Effect <strong>of</strong> Different Legumes in Legume-Castor Relay Cropping System<br />

S. P. Deshmukh*, V. Surve, T. U. Patel, H. H. Patel and D. D. Patel<br />

College <strong>of</strong> Agriculture, Navsari Agricultural University, Bharuch, Gujarat – 392 012<br />

*swapnildeshmukh@nau.in<br />

Ecosystem based approaches for climate change adaptation, ecosystem services, integrated farming system<br />

models, Land degradation neutrality<br />

225 | Page<br />

T2-35P<br />

In the scenario <strong>of</strong> conventional farming system, limited chances are available to cope with<br />

sustainability and productivity issues at the same time. Relay cropping may play a crucial role<br />

in tackling this concern, by increasing the sustainability with minimum tillage, continuous soil<br />

cover along with increase in land productivity. Lot <strong>of</strong> studies already reflected the benefits to<br />

crops sown after legume crop, so more emphasis was given in this study to directly relate the<br />

research towards a best choice <strong>of</strong> legumes for relay cropping in castor crop. With these<br />

thoughts this research was framed to study different legume-castor relay cropping systems<br />

viz.,greengram-castor, clusterbean (veg)- castor, blackgram-castor, cowpea-castor and sole


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

castor (control). The results revealed that greengram-castor and blackgram-castor are the best<br />

identified relay cropping system for obtaining higher castor equivalent yield and monetary<br />

returns as per the three years <strong>of</strong> experimentation. However, the study also showed that legumecastor<br />

relay cropping gives more than two folds returns than sole castor.<br />

Effect <strong>of</strong> Seeding Rate on Seed Yield and Yield Components <strong>of</strong> Alfalfa<br />

(Medicago Sativa) for Minimizing Abiotic Stress<br />

T2-36P<br />

S. Iqbal, Z. A. Dar, M. Habeeb, S. Nassir, Z. Rashied, S. Basheer, S. Majeed, F. Rasool,<br />

E. Shanaz, A. Lone<br />

Dryland Agriculture Research Station, Rangreth, SKUAST-Kashmir<br />

A new look at the effect <strong>of</strong> seeding rates on long-term alfalfa seed production is necessary to<br />

see if reducing seeding rates is an economically viable option to reduce biotic stress and cut<br />

input costs, without sacrificing seed yield and income. At this time, a wide range <strong>of</strong> seeding<br />

rates is being used in Ladakh without evaluating their effects on seed yield and seed yield<br />

components <strong>of</strong> alfalfa. Therefore, the purpose <strong>of</strong> this study was to investigate the effect <strong>of</strong><br />

different seeding rates on seed yield and seed yield components <strong>of</strong> alfalfa in the Cold Arid<br />

Region <strong>of</strong> Ladakh. In this regard a field experiment was conducted at Mountain Agriculture<br />

Research and Extension Station Kargil (MAR&ES), Sub-station, SKUAST-K, to study the<br />

effect <strong>of</strong> seeding rate on seed yield and seed yield components <strong>of</strong> alfalfa (Medicago sativa) for<br />

two growing seasons. Seeding rate treatments were 2.5 kg ha -1 (SR 1<br />

), 5.0 kg ha -1 (SR 2<br />

), 7.5 kg<br />

ha -1 (SR 3<br />

), 10.0 kg ha -1 (SR 4<br />

) and 12.5 kg ha -1 (SR 5<br />

). Seed yield and seed yield components<br />

(number <strong>of</strong> pods per m 2 , number seeds per pod and 1000-seed weight) were determined for all<br />

treatments. The statistical results <strong>of</strong> the study indicated that seeding rate significantly (P =<br />

0.01) affected seed yield and number <strong>of</strong> pods per m 2 , but there was no significant difference in<br />

number seeds per pod and 1000-seed weight. The maximum value <strong>of</strong> seed yield (805.0 kg ha -1 )<br />

and number <strong>of</strong> pods per m 2 (6610) was obtained in case <strong>of</strong> SR 1<br />

treatment. Conversely, the<br />

minimum value <strong>of</strong> seed yield (605.7 kg ha -1 ) and number <strong>of</strong> pods per m 2 (4620) was observed<br />

in case <strong>of</strong> SR 5<br />

treatment. Therefore, 2.5 kg ha -1 was found to be more appropriate seeding rate<br />

in improving seed yield <strong>of</strong> alfalfa in the cold arid region <strong>of</strong> Ladakh.<br />

226 | Page<br />

Ecosystem based approaches for climate change adaptation, ecosystem services, integrated farming system models, Land<br />

degradation neutrality


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

T2-37P<br />

Impact <strong>of</strong> Climate Change on Pokkali Farming System<br />

S. P. Vikas* and Shinoj Subramannian<br />

ICAR-Krishi Vigyan Kendra (Ernakulam), ICAR- Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute,<br />

Narakkal, Kochi- 682 505, Kerala<br />

* vikaspattath@gmail.com<br />

Pokkali is a unique farming system in coastal areas <strong>of</strong> Ernakulam, Thrissur and Alappuzha<br />

districts <strong>of</strong> Kerala where paddy and shrimp are cultivated alternatively in the same field.<br />

Uniqueness <strong>of</strong> this farming system is that the paddy is saline tolerant and there is no external<br />

inputs required either as fertilizer for paddy or feed for shrimp. The maximum salinity during<br />

paddy crop that is raised during June to September is 4 ppt and maximum salinity during<br />

shrimp crop that is raised during November to May is 30 ppt. The timing <strong>of</strong> both paddy crop<br />

and shrimp crop is critical as optimum levels <strong>of</strong> salinity and water quality are essential for<br />

successful crop. Monsoon showers normally occurring during the first week <strong>of</strong> June every year<br />

flush out salt accumulation in soil and bring down the salinity to safer levels to facilitate<br />

sprouting <strong>of</strong> paddy seeds. Subsequent to sowing, the water level in Pokkali fields is kept<br />

minimum by shutting down the field sluice gates till root development to prevent seeds getting<br />

washed away. The production from Pokkali fields reduced considerably in recent years. The<br />

cost <strong>of</strong> production also increased and the Pokkali farming became no longer pr<strong>of</strong>itable. In this<br />

context, a survey was conducted to examine the impact <strong>of</strong> climatic atrocities on these<br />

developments. The area selected was Kadamakkudy and Karumallur panchayaths in Ernakulam<br />

district <strong>of</strong> Kerala. The monsoon showers delayed by 3 to5 weeks during the past four years<br />

resulted corresponding delay in paddy sowing pushing the cropping period to July to October.<br />

This caused exposure <strong>of</strong> paddy crop to higher salinities upto 6 ppt resulting stress to the crop<br />

and reduced production. The average production <strong>of</strong> eight quintals per acre paddy dropped to<br />

5.5 quintals per acre. The subsequent shrimp farming also affected due to the delay. The<br />

average production <strong>of</strong> 3.6 quintals per acre dropped to 1.2 quintals per acre. Another issue<br />

expressed by the farmers is that the seeds are washed out in flash floods. There were times in<br />

these four years when the sowing had to be repeated upto three times incurring additional<br />

expenses. The seed cost per acre is Rs.2,700/-.<br />

Ecosystem based approaches for climate change adaptation, ecosystem services, integrated farming system<br />

models, Land degradation neutrality<br />

227 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Impact <strong>of</strong> Front-Line Demonstration on the Yield and Economics <strong>of</strong><br />

Coriander under TDC- NICRA in Kota District <strong>of</strong> Rajasthan, India<br />

Dilip Matwa 1* , C.L. Meena 1 , P.P. Rohilla 2 , Mahendra Singh 2 , and R.R. Meena 2<br />

T2-38P<br />

1 ICAR-Agriculture Technology Application Research Institute Zone-II, Jodhpur, Rajasthan-344001,<br />

2 Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Borkhera, Kota Agriculture University, Kota, Rajasthan-3240011,<br />

*dilip93matwa@gmail.com<br />

The study was carried out in National Innovations in Climate Resilient Agriculture (NICRA-<br />

TDC) Project village Chomakot <strong>of</strong> Kota district during 2011-12-13 to 2019-20. Total 184 front<br />

line demonstrations (FLDs) were conducted on coriander (Coriandrum sativum) in 92.6 ha by<br />

the active participation <strong>of</strong> the farmers with the objective <strong>of</strong> improved technologies <strong>of</strong> coriander<br />

production potentials. The improved technologies consist performance <strong>of</strong> high yielder<br />

&climate resilient varieties viz.RCr-436, RKD-18, balanced fertilizers (soil test based)<br />

application and integrated disease and pest management. The demonstrated recorded an<br />

average yield ranging from 875 kg to 2225 kgha -1 with a mean <strong>of</strong> 1602 kgha -1 . The per cent<br />

increase yield in demonstration ranged from 9.46% to 36.08% with a mean <strong>of</strong> 14.18 % in the<br />

respective years. The average demonstrated field gave higher net returns <strong>of</strong> Rs. 57383.56ha -<br />

1<br />

and B:C ratio 3.452., over control group i.e. Rs. 48639.56ha -1 with 3.259 B:C ratio from<br />

coriander variety, respectively. Present results clearly show that the yield and economics <strong>of</strong><br />

Coriander variety having low temperature stress & stem gall disease tolerance, higher yielding<br />

can be boost up by adoption <strong>of</strong> recommended technology in Kota district <strong>of</strong> Rajasthan.<br />

T2-39P<br />

Impact <strong>of</strong> Onset Date <strong>of</strong> Monsoon on Kharif Crops in Bhadohi District <strong>of</strong> UP<br />

Sarvesh Baranwal*, Vishvendu Dwivedi, Rudal Prasad Chaudhary, G.K. Chaudhory<br />

ICAR-IIVR-KVK Bhadohi, UP, India<br />

*sarveshbaranwal@gmail.com<br />

Inter and intra seasonal fluctuation in climate has a significant impact on the sowing <strong>of</strong> crops.<br />

Climate change is now a reality as evident from the significant increase in CO2 concentration<br />

and global mean temperature. increasing levels <strong>of</strong> GHGs alter the energy balance between the<br />

atmosphere and the earth’s surface, in turn, the instability <strong>of</strong> monsoon. Monsoon plays a<br />

pivotal role in the sustenance <strong>of</strong> India's food & water security, prosperity and agro-ecological<br />

systems. An estimated ∼60% <strong>of</strong> the total population in the Indian subcontinent is dependent on<br />

monsoon rainfall. The fluctuations and changes in Indian monsoon rainfall on spatial and<br />

228 | Page<br />

Ecosystem based approaches for climate change adaptation, ecosystem services, integrated farming system models, Land<br />

degradation neutrality


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

temporal scale is closely linked to cropping pattern. Monsoon rain govern the sowing area <strong>of</strong><br />

crop in kharif season. Over the years, it has been directly experienced that the erratic &<br />

irregular <strong>of</strong> monsoon entry at the district level is affecting the cropped area and its pattern.<br />

Premature and early arrival and late arrival <strong>of</strong> monsoon has been observed to affect the crops<br />

covered in the area. In the year 2021, monsoon onset started in second week <strong>of</strong> June in Bhadohi<br />

district <strong>of</strong> UP and their symmetrical contribution <strong>of</strong> rainfall (above normal rain) and 2 nd week<br />

<strong>of</strong> June monsoon onset in year 2021 boosted the area <strong>of</strong> paddy viz. 27397 ha and production<br />

was 84031 MT. Result concluded that onset <strong>of</strong> monsoon commencement date and monsoon<br />

pattern affected the area, production and productivity <strong>of</strong> kharif crops.<br />

T2-40P<br />

Integrated Farming System Module for Strengthening Traditional Rainfed<br />

IFS for Small and Marginal Farm Holdings in Southern Zone <strong>of</strong> Tamil Nadu<br />

G. Guru*, K. Baskar, S. Manoharan, V. Sanjivkumar and M. Manikandan<br />

AICRPDA Main Centre,Agricultural Research Station,Tamil Nadu Agricultural University,<br />

Kovilpatti- 628 501, Thoothukudi District, Tamil Nadu<br />

* gurusangeetha2005@gmail.com<br />

In general, in regions with rainfall <strong>of</strong> 500 to 700 mm, the farming systems should be based on<br />

livestock with promotion <strong>of</strong> low water requiring grasses, trees and bushes to meet fodder, fuel<br />

and timber requirements. In areas <strong>of</strong> 700 to 1100 mm rainfall, crop, horticulture and livestockbased<br />

farming systems can be adopted depending on the soil type and the marketability factors.<br />

Nearly 60% <strong>of</strong> the Indian population directly depends on agricultural activities as a source <strong>of</strong><br />

livelihood. Indian agriculture is dominated by small and marginal farmers (86%), having only<br />

44% <strong>of</strong> the total arable land (GOI, 2014). In 2010–2011, the average size <strong>of</strong> an operating land<br />

holding was 1.16 ha, and farm size has been further reduced due to fragmentation. The<br />

fragmentation <strong>of</strong> land resources is posing a serious threat to future sustainability, food security,<br />

and pr<strong>of</strong>itability <strong>of</strong> Indian farming. Due to these aberrations, farmers are unable to get<br />

sufficient income to sustain their family. The rising cost <strong>of</strong> food and energy, depleting water<br />

supply, diminishing farm size, soil degradation, imbalanced fertilizer use, excessive use <strong>of</strong><br />

agrochemicals, and climate change are all contributing to the problems <strong>of</strong> agricultural<br />

production system. Hence, the increasing area under agriculture to meet the burgeoning food<br />

demand is under threat. The modern agricultural production systems are simplified due to<br />

specialization and are intensified with high rates <strong>of</strong> external inputs to keep production<br />

conditions favourable and constant.<br />

Methodology<br />

In Thoothukudi district <strong>of</strong> Tamil Nadu with the mean annual rainfall is 711 mm, it was found<br />

that farmers with cropping activity alone incurred losses due to poor yield <strong>of</strong> maize, cotton and<br />

Ecosystem based approaches for climate change adaptation, ecosystem services, integrated farming system<br />

models, Land degradation neutrality<br />

229 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

pulses, sometimes even failure <strong>of</strong> crops, as a result <strong>of</strong> drought/prolonged dry spells during crop<br />

growing season. On farm studies indicated that inclusive <strong>of</strong> livestock (milch cow – cross bred<br />

jersey) farmers was benefited by getting additional income from milch animals and crop<br />

component. AICRPDA - Kovilpatti main centre is selected Thoothukudi district for rainfed<br />

integrated farming system activities. It is a preferred district where the centre is located with<br />

representation for rainfed condition. Kayathar and Kovilpatti blocks were selected randomly<br />

for the RIFS studies. These blocks having more area under rainfed conditions. Similarly, three<br />

villages are randomly selected from each <strong>of</strong> the selected block <strong>of</strong> the district. Priority was<br />

given to the villages in the following order: villages having less than 10 % irrigated area ><br />

villages having less than 20 % area > villages having less than 30 % irrigated area. AICRPDA,<br />

Kovilpatti main centre surveyed totally 240 respondents from two blocks (6 villages). Sum <strong>of</strong><br />

123 farmers under rainfed (RF) situation and 117 under partial irrigated (PIR) situation from 6<br />

villages <strong>of</strong> Thoothukudi district. Each 37 marginal farmers from RF and PIR, 40 small farmers<br />

from RF and 38 from PIR and 45 medium farmers from RF and 42 from PIR. Finally, 24<br />

farmers from Vadakupatti village <strong>of</strong> Kovilpatti were selected for implementing the on-farm<br />

research activity. Under each farming situations and farming systems, two farmers each in<br />

marginal, small and medium categories were selected to implement the RIFS activities.<br />

Results<br />

Among the module examined, the results revealed that in rainfed situation crop + large<br />

ruminant (milch cow-cross bred jersey) with intervention were recorded a maximum maize<br />

equivalent yield, net return and employment generation in marginal farm holdings (14423<br />

kgha -1 , Rs.119404 and 402 Man days) and small farm holdings (20407 kgha -1 , Rs.169253 and<br />

521 Man days)respectively over no intervention. In Partially Irrigated situation the module,<br />

crop + large ruminant (milch cow-cross bred jersey) with intervention were recorded a<br />

maximum Maize Equivalent Yield, Net Return and Employment generation in marginal farm<br />

holdings (25019 kgha -1 , Rs.193477 and 512 Man days) and small farm holdings (28557 kgha -1 ,<br />

Rs.267956 and 689 Man days )respectively over no intervention.<br />

Name <strong>of</strong> the farmer Area(ha) Livestock<br />

(Nos.)<br />

Mean data for the Year 2020 – 21 and 2021-22<br />

Maize<br />

equivalent<br />

yield(kg)<br />

Rainfed situation<br />

Marginal<br />

Cost <strong>of</strong><br />

cultivation/<br />

production<br />

(Rs)<br />

Net<br />

returns<br />

(Rs)<br />

Employment<br />

generation<br />

(man-days)<br />

With intervention 0.87 1.67 14423 146946 119404 402<br />

No intervention 0.85 1.67 9411 103147 53430 339<br />

Small<br />

With intervention 1.71 2.17 20407 187779 169253 521<br />

230 | Page<br />

Ecosystem based approaches for climate change adaptation, ecosystem services, integrated farming system models, Land<br />

degradation neutrality


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

No intervention 1.87 2.17 14239 151761 92443 482<br />

Partially irrigated situation<br />

Marginal<br />

With intervention 0.88 2.33 25019 185563 193477 512<br />

No intervention 0.90 2.33 12867 138225 84629 436<br />

Small<br />

With intervention 1.85 2.83 28557 245991 267956 689<br />

No intervention 1.52 2.83 19431 199875 143427 610<br />

Conclusion<br />

Among the rainfed and partially irrigated situations, under partially Irrigated with intervention<br />

was the best promising IFS, which generated the highest system productivity, employment<br />

generation and net returns over rainfed situation.<br />

References<br />

GOI. 2014. District Census Hand <strong>Book</strong>. Office <strong>of</strong> Registrar General and Census Commissioner<br />

<strong>of</strong> India, Ministry <strong>of</strong> Home Affairs, Government <strong>of</strong> India.<br />

Seasonal Growth Potential and Performance <strong>of</strong> Ramie Fodder Crop<br />

(Boehmeria nivea) Under Extreme Climatic Conditions in North India<br />

Ashutosh 1* , Ashish Kumar Singh 1 , Satish Kumar 2 and Anil Kumar 1<br />

1 Animal Physiology Division, ICAR-National Dairy Research Institute, Karnal-132 001, India<br />

2 Krishi Vigyan Kendra, ICAR-National Dairy Research Institute, Karnal-132 001, India<br />

* ludri_ludri@yahoo.co.in<br />

T2-41P<br />

The origin place <strong>of</strong> ramie is Malaysia. Ramie belongs to Urticaceae family & it is a perennial<br />

fodder and fibre crop grown in large areas <strong>of</strong> North Eastern states <strong>of</strong> India and Southeast Asian<br />

countries. The ramie plants have many herbal properties like vitamins, macro & micro minerals<br />

and other medicinal properties as per the available literature. The recent studies have shown<br />

that ramie has high content <strong>of</strong> protein and it provides around 21-25% crude protein. Out <strong>of</strong> the<br />

net sown area in country, 4.5% has been attributed to fodder crops. To satisfy the rapidly<br />

increasing demand <strong>of</strong> livestock products as well as to contribute to the government’s strategies<br />

to double the farmer’s income, it seems to be a need to increase the quantity and quality <strong>of</strong><br />

fodder to support livestock. Better the quality <strong>of</strong> fodder better will be the livestock<br />

productivity. At the current level <strong>of</strong> growth in forage resources, there will be 18.4% and 13.2%<br />

deficit in green and dry fodder respectively in the year 2050 as per the estimates <strong>of</strong> ICAR<br />

vision report 2050.The use <strong>of</strong> ramie as a fodder may also be cost effective for providing protein<br />

rich fodder to livestock species for enhancing productive performance as well as it will also<br />

Ecosystem based approaches for climate change adaptation, ecosystem services, integrated farming system<br />

models, Land degradation neutrality<br />

231 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

increase the income <strong>of</strong> farmers in the coming years in the harsh climatic condition specially<br />

during summer in North India. According to FAO (2005), ramie plants per hectare can produce<br />

up to 300 tons <strong>of</strong> fresh forage / year, equivalent to 42 tons <strong>of</strong> dry matter. Suryanah et al.,<br />

(2018) also reported based on the research conducted till now, the best cutting age for the ramie<br />

plant as a source <strong>of</strong> forage is at the age <strong>of</strong> 30 days.<br />

Methodology<br />

One trial in previously planted ramie (Boehmeria nivea) field was planned and designed for<br />

accessing the seasonal growth performance and other related parameters during winter season<br />

(December 2021), hot humid season (August, 2021) and hot dry season (April 2022) at ICAR<br />

NDRI, Karnal field area. The month <strong>of</strong> April 2022 was marked as the hottest month in last 122<br />

years and by chance the dates <strong>of</strong> trials fall in this duration hence the recorded data have<br />

additional importance. Three years back the ramie plants were propagated by stem cuttings,<br />

layering, division <strong>of</strong> parent root stalks or rhizome cutting 10 to 15 cm long and 15-20 cm deep<br />

Suckers and planted in rows 100 to 120 cm apart, with individual plants spaced 30 to 60 cm<br />

apart the rhizomes were planted on ridges to keep it safe from water logged situations. Under<br />

experiment 40 lines <strong>of</strong> well grown ramie plants were harvested 4 inch above the ground level<br />

in one day and from the very next day (1 st day <strong>of</strong> experiment), the recording <strong>of</strong> parameters like<br />

total biomass per line in grams, plant height in centimeters, number <strong>of</strong> leafs per plant and<br />

percent water content were recorded daily for each line for next 40 days continuously on same<br />

time <strong>of</strong> the day during the experiment period in different seasons.<br />

Results<br />

The data recorded and its graphical presentation is given below. The seasonal comparison on<br />

plant growth number <strong>of</strong> leafs cut plants individual bund weight and water content percent was<br />

done. The plant growth (height in centimeter) was found to be highest during the month <strong>of</strong><br />

April 2022(hot dry season) followed by August 2021(hot humid season) and lowest plant<br />

growth was recorded during December 2020-2021(winter season). During the trial <strong>of</strong> 40 days,<br />

the plant height was maximum at 40 th day which was 38.39cm in winter, 141.8 cm in July (hot<br />

season) and highest was in hot dry season, which indicates that ramie crop may be able to<br />

survive in high temperature and low humidity zones with regular irrigation facilities.<br />

The number <strong>of</strong> leafs per plant were highest during hot dry season as compared to winter and<br />

hot humid season. During hot dry season, the percent increase in number <strong>of</strong> leafs plants was<br />

lower as compared to hot dry season. The number <strong>of</strong> leafs remained 69.84% as compared to<br />

average value <strong>of</strong> 100%, whereas it was 81.62% in hot humid season whereas highest<br />

percentage number <strong>of</strong> leafs increased 148.3% as compared to the average scale <strong>of</strong> 100% that is<br />

around 1.5 times more than the average value, which clearly indicates that the average leaf<br />

232 | Page<br />

Ecosystem based approaches for climate change adaptation, ecosystem services, integrated farming system models, Land<br />

degradation neutrality


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

number was reduced to 30.16% in winter and 18.38% in hot humid season whereas 48.53%<br />

increases in hot dry seasons.<br />

Similarly, average bund weight for 40 days i.e. from day one to day 40 varied between 35.01<br />

grams (winter season), 523.86 grams (hot humid season) and highest was reported during hot<br />

dry season that is in March and April 2022(hottest in last 122 years).<br />

3000<br />

2500<br />

Average weight/ bund (gm) December<br />

Average weight/ bund (gm) April<br />

Average weight/ bund (gm) August<br />

Average weight/ bund (gm)<br />

2000<br />

1500<br />

1000<br />

500<br />

0<br />

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 2122 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40<br />

Percent Water Content<br />

100<br />

90<br />

80<br />

70<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

Plant water content (%) December<br />

Plant water content (%) August<br />

Plant water content (%) April<br />

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40<br />

Plant water content (in percent) remained between 75 to 85 percent, which indicates that crop<br />

was well adapted to maintain its water content as well as its dry matter content during first 22<br />

to 24 days during hot dry period, thereafter the water content starts declining from 75 to 45<br />

percent after 25 days onwards, may be due to more temperature and low humidity, which<br />

caused dehydration in plants and second reason may be the increases in fiber content (lignin<br />

content) <strong>of</strong> the plant days 25 onwards. Similar, trend was observed during the month <strong>of</strong><br />

December and plant water content declined from day 26 to 40 th day and ranged between 80.52<br />

to 66%.<br />

Conclusion<br />

In India under the changing climate scenario, green fodder production and its availability to the<br />

livestock round the year is a challenge particularly in India. The results <strong>of</strong> this experiment<br />

concluded that the ramie plant is capable <strong>of</strong> supplying green fodder round the year, during<br />

extreme climatic / environmental conditions round the year. The crop is capable <strong>of</strong> giving 12 to<br />

Ecosystem based approaches for climate change adaptation, ecosystem services, integrated farming system<br />

models, Land degradation neutrality<br />

233 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

14 cuts per year with excellent biomass productivity (around 2400-2600 quintals/acre/annum)<br />

upto next 10 to 12 years without involving cost on major field operations like ploughing,<br />

regular seed cost (sowing) and others. Only minor operations like weed removal or thinning <strong>of</strong><br />

old bunds and regular irrigations are required. Being the crop <strong>of</strong> South East Asia origin, which<br />

can only survive better in the hot humid zones/humid zones <strong>of</strong> the country need to be modified<br />

that this crop may also be grown in the areas with hot dry climatic conditions with exceeding<br />

maximum temperatures beyond 42 0 C. Therefore, more emphasis should be given on the<br />

production <strong>of</strong> alternate crops where ramie plants stand out to be a better option as dual-purpose<br />

crop for enhancing productivity <strong>of</strong> livestock species.<br />

References<br />

FAO. 2005. Animal Feed Resources Information System. Boehmeria nivea.<br />

http://www.fao.org/ag/aga/agap/frg/afris/Data/ 361.htm.<br />

ICAR (Indian Council <strong>of</strong> Agricultural Research). 2015. Vision 2050, Indian Council <strong>of</strong><br />

Agricultural Research, New Delhi<br />

Suryanah, S., Rochana, A., Susilawati, I. and Indiriani, N.P., 2018. Ramie (Boehmeria nivea)<br />

plant nutrient quality as feed forage at various cut ages. Animal Prod., 19(2):111-118.<br />

T2-42P-1679<br />

Impact <strong>of</strong> Adaptation Technologies on Resilience in Drought Prone Regions<br />

<strong>of</strong> Maharashtra, India<br />

J.V.N.S. Prasad 1* , K.K .Zade 2 , D.B. Devsarkar 3 , R. Rejani 1 , D.B.V. Ramana 1 , K. Sammi<br />

Reddy 1 , Lakhan Singh 4 , B.V.S. Kiran 1 , C.M. Pradeep 1 , Irfan Shaikh 2 , M. Prabhakar 1 ,<br />

V.K. Singh 1<br />

1 Indian Council <strong>of</strong> Agricultural Research (ICAR) - Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture<br />

(CRIDA) Hyderabad, India.<br />

2 Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Aurangabad, Vasantrao Naik Marathwada Krishi Vidyapeeth (VNMKV),<br />

Parbhani, Maharashtra, India.<br />

3 Director <strong>of</strong> Extension Education, VNMKV, Parbhani, Maharashtra, India.<br />

4 ICAR-Agricultural Technology Application Research Institute (ATARI), Pune, India.<br />

*jasti2008@gmail.com<br />

Climatic stresses such as frequent droughts, dry spells, floods, frost, cyclones, heat and cold<br />

waves significantly effect agriculture. Several districts <strong>of</strong> Maharashtra particularly in the<br />

Marathwada region, receive relatively low rainfall are frequently impacted by variable and low<br />

rainfall and <strong>of</strong>ten drought. Several technologies developed by the national agricultural research<br />

system can potentially minimise the impact <strong>of</strong> variable rainfall and drought. As part <strong>of</strong><br />

Technology Demonstration Component (TDC) <strong>of</strong> National Innovation on Climate Resilient<br />

234 | Page<br />

Ecosystem based approaches for climate change adaptation, ecosystem services, integrated farming system models, Land<br />

degradation neutrality


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Agriculture (NICRA), promising technologies which can minimise the impact <strong>of</strong> drought are<br />

demonstrated in 121 climatically vulnerable districts. The present study was takenup at Shekta<br />

Village <strong>of</strong> Aurangabad district <strong>of</strong> Maharashtra as representative location <strong>of</strong> drought to assess<br />

the performance <strong>of</strong> the climate resilient technologies during a drought year. A systematic frame<br />

work is developed to examine the performance <strong>of</strong> the climate resilient technologies in terms <strong>of</strong><br />

bio-physical yields and net returns during normal (2019-20) and drought (2018-19) years in<br />

comparison with the farmers’ practice. Adoption <strong>of</strong> the climate resilient technologies such as<br />

improved varieties, water management and livestock practices helped to increase the yield and<br />

income resilience compared to non-adopters during drought years. The extent <strong>of</strong> resilience<br />

achieved is highest from improved cultivars with supplemental irrigation which ranged from 25<br />

to 75% followed by livestock technologies which ranged from 89 to 112%. Adoption <strong>of</strong><br />

multiple enterprises such as crop + livestock + horticulture enhanced income and resilience<br />

upto 112% when compared to single enterprise. Study suggests that, enhancing water storage<br />

potential has created ample opportunities for increasing cropping intensification and to address<br />

the drought in low rainfall areas which further helps to enhance the resilience.<br />

Ecosystem based approaches for climate change adaptation, ecosystem services, integrated farming system<br />

models, Land degradation neutrality<br />

235 | Page


Theme– 2a<br />

Climate resilient agriculture for risk<br />

mitigation


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

236 | Page<br />

Theme-2a: Climate resilient agriculture for risk mitigation<br />

List <strong>of</strong> <strong>Extended</strong> Summaries<br />

S. No. Title First Author ID<br />

1 Economic impact <strong>of</strong> adoption <strong>of</strong> climate resilient<br />

technologies in drylands <strong>of</strong> Karnataka, India<br />

2 Enhancing water productivity in rainfed<br />

agriculture through in-situ and ex-situ rain water<br />

harvesting- NICRA experiences<br />

3 Climate Resilient technologies for sustainable<br />

farm incomes in Kurnool district <strong>of</strong> Andhra<br />

Pradesh<br />

4 Climate change adaptation models for the major<br />

farming system typologies in Sundarbans<br />

5 Crop production interventions for reducing the<br />

impact <strong>of</strong> changing climate in North East<br />

6 An integrated index <strong>of</strong> climate, carbon, yield, and<br />

sustainability for identification <strong>of</strong> resilient<br />

management options under cereal-based cropping<br />

system<br />

7 Evaluation <strong>of</strong> yield performance in high yielding<br />

finger millet varieties in NICRA Villages <strong>of</strong><br />

Ganjam<br />

8 Real-time contingency planning and preparedness<br />

to cope with weather aberrations in agriculture:<br />

Experiences from NICRA<br />

9 Performance <strong>of</strong> pigeon pea based intercropping<br />

systems under changing climatic conditions<br />

10 Does rise in atmospheric temperature and carbon<br />

dioxide adversely affect maize growth in acid<br />

soils <strong>of</strong> Northeast India?<br />

11 Environment-friendly utilization <strong>of</strong> basic slag and<br />

methanotroph to mitigate methane emission in<br />

lowland rice<br />

12 Sustainable intensification <strong>of</strong> rainfed lands<br />

through food-fodder based systems for climatic<br />

resilience and fodder security in semi-arid regions<br />

<strong>of</strong> India<br />

13 Characterizing different Indian farming systems to<br />

assess their resilience to climate change<br />

14 Impact <strong>of</strong> climate resilient interventions in<br />

NICRA village Rupana <strong>of</strong> Sirsa district in<br />

Haryana<br />

15 On-farm assessment <strong>of</strong> climate resilient<br />

interventions for sustaining crop productivity in<br />

rainfed eco-system<br />

Josily<br />

BV Asewar<br />

G Dhanalakshmi<br />

PK Garain<br />

T2a-01O-1095<br />

T2a-02O-1161<br />

T2a-03O-1238<br />

T2a-04O-1415<br />

Bagish Kumar T2a-05O -1509<br />

N Subhash<br />

S Mangaraj<br />

SB Patil<br />

M Sudhakar<br />

Ramesh<br />

Thangavel<br />

S Swain<br />

Sunil Kumar<br />

Abhilasha Singh<br />

DS Jakhar<br />

MS Pendke<br />

T2a-05aO-1339<br />

T2a-06R-1010<br />

T2a-07R-1054<br />

T2a-08R-1222<br />

T2a-09R-1224<br />

T2a-10R-1247<br />

T2a-11R-1300<br />

T2a-12R-1319<br />

T2a-13R-1587<br />

T2a-14P-1049<br />

Climate resilient agriculture for risk mitigation


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

16 Evaluation <strong>of</strong> mustard [Brassica juncea (L.)<br />

Czern and Coss] varieties to staggered sowing in<br />

changing climatic scenarios under custard apple<br />

based agri-horti system<br />

17 Assessment <strong>of</strong> different system <strong>of</strong> rice cultivation<br />

technique for combating climatic aberrations in<br />

rainfed medium land situation <strong>of</strong> Purulia district<br />

<strong>of</strong> West Bengal, India during kharif season<br />

18 Musk melon cultivation on reservoir basin: a<br />

climate smart and pr<strong>of</strong>itable farmer practice in<br />

arid zone <strong>of</strong> Rajasthan<br />

19 Effect <strong>of</strong> different types <strong>of</strong> mulching on growth<br />

and productivity <strong>of</strong> pointed gourd under stress<br />

climatic condition<br />

20 Demonstration <strong>of</strong> climate resilient practices to<br />

sustain crop productivity in various climatic<br />

vulnerability situations<br />

21 Makhana a highly pr<strong>of</strong>itable venture under flood<br />

prone waterlogged areas<br />

22 Effect <strong>of</strong> different sowing dates and nitrogen<br />

levels on the productivity <strong>of</strong> wet-seeded kharif<br />

rice under post-flood situation in Assam<br />

23 Effect <strong>of</strong> Black cumin (Nigella sativa) and Garlic<br />

(Allium sativum) as natural feed additive on<br />

growth performance <strong>of</strong> kaveri chicken<br />

24 Models <strong>of</strong> integrated farming systems resilient to<br />

soil erosion in a changing climate in<br />

mountain agriculture<br />

25 Effect <strong>of</strong> different planting dates and varieties on<br />

growth and yield <strong>of</strong> rice (Oryza Sativa) under<br />

irrigated subtropics <strong>of</strong> J&K UT<br />

26 Effect <strong>of</strong> in-situ moisture conservation measures<br />

and stress management practices on growth and<br />

productivity <strong>of</strong> rainfed cotton<br />

27 Enhancement in different cropping systems<br />

productivity and pr<strong>of</strong>itability under climate<br />

resilient agriculture (CRA)<br />

28 Crop water requirement and irrigation water<br />

management in changing climate for sugarcane<br />

crop in Baghpat district, U.P.<br />

29 Study <strong>of</strong> moth bean (Vigna aconitifolia) as a<br />

multifaceted climate resilient crop<br />

30 Dissemination <strong>of</strong> productivity enhancement<br />

technologies in pigeonpea through frontline<br />

demonstrations<br />

31 Demonstration <strong>of</strong> fish seed rearing in natural<br />

water bodies <strong>of</strong> rainfed agro-ecosystem: A case <strong>of</strong><br />

Climate resilient agriculture for risk mitigation<br />

Sudhir Kumar<br />

Rajpoot<br />

T2a-15P-1069<br />

SK Bhattacharya T2a-16P -1077<br />

Chandan Kumar<br />

C Saha Parya<br />

Rashid Khan<br />

Hemant Kumar<br />

Singh<br />

KS Teja<br />

GK Londhe<br />

BU Choudhury<br />

Monika Banotra<br />

Mohammed<br />

Ashraf<br />

Reeta Singh<br />

Gaurav Sharma<br />

G Gomadhi<br />

Debesh Singh<br />

Ch Balakrishna<br />

T2a-17P-1120<br />

T2a-18P-1206<br />

T2a-19P-1231<br />

T2a-20P-1239<br />

T2a-21P-1243<br />

T2a-22P-1248<br />

T2a-23P-1249<br />

T2a-24P-1308<br />

T2a-25P-1369<br />

T2a-26P-1385<br />

T2a-27P-1388<br />

T2a-28P-1422<br />

T2a-29P-1435<br />

T2a-30P-1468<br />

237 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

a farmer from Srikakulam, district <strong>of</strong> north coastal<br />

Andhra Pradesh<br />

32 Studies on the effect <strong>of</strong> rice varieties on flood<br />

tolerant in Karaikal District<br />

33 Crop diversification at agricultural landscape level<br />

for climate change adaptation in rainfed<br />

agroecosystems<br />

34 Demonstration <strong>of</strong> climate resilient technologies<br />

for mitigation in the North East<br />

35 Climate smart crop diversification through paddypea<br />

cropping system under raised beds in lowland<br />

rice fallow<br />

36 Impact <strong>of</strong> climatic variability on wheat varieties in<br />

NICRA villages <strong>of</strong> Kullu district <strong>of</strong> Himachal<br />

Pradesh<br />

37 Performance <strong>of</strong> climate resilient technology<br />

demonstrations in kullu district <strong>of</strong> Himachal<br />

Pradesh<br />

38 Studies on effect <strong>of</strong> weather on flowering and<br />

yield <strong>of</strong> mango<br />

39 Impact <strong>of</strong> technology demonstration through<br />

NICRA-interventions in Bhagalpur district <strong>of</strong><br />

Bihar<br />

40 Effect <strong>of</strong> Pusa Hydrogel on pearl millet crop yield<br />

under rainfed farming<br />

41 Impact <strong>of</strong> climate resilient practices on cabbage<br />

productivity in nicra villages <strong>of</strong> Tuensang district<br />

in Nagaland<br />

42 Enhance the climate resilience through rainfed<br />

agriculture under NICRA Project in Srikakulam<br />

district <strong>of</strong> north coastal AP<br />

V Aravinth<br />

G Ravindra<br />

Chary<br />

M Thoithoi Devi<br />

Meghna Sarma<br />

Subhash Kumar<br />

RK Rana<br />

AP Mallikarjuna<br />

Gowda<br />

Sailabala Dei<br />

Ramesh Kumar<br />

Pijush Kanti<br />

Biswas<br />

G Naveen Kumar<br />

T2a-31P-1469<br />

T2a-32P-1478<br />

T2a-33P-1508<br />

T2a-34P-1562<br />

T2a-35P-1568<br />

T2a-36P-1571<br />

T2a-37P-1576<br />

T2a-38P-1583<br />

T2a-39P<br />

T2a-40P-1566<br />

T2a-41P-1493<br />

238 | Page<br />

Climate resilient agriculture for risk mitigation


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

T2a-01O-1095<br />

Economic Impact <strong>of</strong> Adoption <strong>of</strong> Climate Resilient Technologies in<br />

Drylands <strong>of</strong> Karnataka, India<br />

Josily Samuel*, C.A. Rama Rao, B. M. K. Raju, N. Pushpanjali, Nagarjuna Kumar,<br />

A. Gopala Krishna Reddy, Anshida Beevi and V. K. Singh<br />

ICAR-Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, Hyderabad, Telangana 500059, India<br />

*s.josily@icar.gov.in<br />

Agriculture in India is largely rainfed with nearly 60 percent <strong>of</strong> the net sown area having no<br />

access to irrigation. In these regions, agriculture is dependent on monsoon rains which are<br />

known to be inadequate, erratic, and undependable. Despite the efforts to increase the<br />

productivity <strong>of</strong> rainfed drylands, continue to face food insecurity, and poverty and are<br />

vulnerable to climate change. Adoption <strong>of</strong> climate-resilient technologies (CRTs) is critical for<br />

securing income and improving the livelihoods <strong>of</strong> farmers specifically in vulnerable drylands.<br />

At the farm/household level, climate change impacts may reduce income level and stability,<br />

through effects on productivity, production costs, or prices (Komarek, 2020). Investing in<br />

resilient agricultural development is one <strong>of</strong> the important responses and the network program<br />

<strong>of</strong> the National Initiative on Climate Resilient Agriculture (NICRA) is an important program<br />

to build resilience. Location-specific climate-resilient interventions through the climateresilient<br />

villages (CRVs) and their impacts on farmer income need better assessment and<br />

quantification. The aim is to improve the resilience <strong>of</strong> Indian agriculture to climate change by<br />

demonstrating technologies or adaptation <strong>of</strong> crops and livestock and thereby upscaling<br />

technologies (Raju et al., 2021).<br />

Methodology<br />

This study brings out the impact adoption <strong>of</strong> CRTs on the farmers <strong>of</strong> NICRA-adopted<br />

villages using the difference-in-difference model and the impact <strong>of</strong> various socio-economic<br />

factors influencing farm income in Karnataka, India. A total <strong>of</strong> 120 households were<br />

surveyed based on a random sampling technique with 60 farm households each from the<br />

treated and control villages. Both treated and controlled villages are purposively kept within<br />

the same district. A detailed pre-tested questionnaire was used to collect data from both<br />

villages by experienced enumerators in the 2019-20 (Plate) household level, data on socioeconomic<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>ile, land endowments, cropping pattern, the composition <strong>of</strong> household income,<br />

and employment before and after NICRA intervention.<br />

Climate resilient agriculture for risk mitigation<br />

239 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Interaction with farmers <strong>of</strong> Kalaburagi district, Karnataka<br />

Results<br />

The study revealed that the NICRA village had higher cropping intensity and the major crops<br />

grown were rice, red gram, cotton, and other vegetables. The NICRA village had more than<br />

80 percent <strong>of</strong> the farm household income from agriculture while in the control village it was<br />

below 60 percent. The average income <strong>of</strong> a farm household in the NICRA village is more<br />

than 40 percent compared to the control village. The study confirms the impact <strong>of</strong> NICRA<br />

interventions. Impact evaluation must determine and must rely on tools and techniques to<br />

estimate the income change in the absence <strong>of</strong> the program (Samuel et al., 2021). The Double<br />

Difference (DD) model output showed that the farm income <strong>of</strong> treated villages was 40<br />

percent higher showing that better climate-smart interventions improved the farm incomes.<br />

Conclusion<br />

Adoption <strong>of</strong> climate resilient and improved technologies though may not directly improve<br />

crop income but may have an indirect impact on farm income and resource allocation.<br />

Farmers need to take adaptation measures and technologies at the farm level like changing<br />

enterprises, diversifying the farming systems, adopting new soil and water conservation<br />

measures, and sometimes moving into non-farm activities. In addition to these, extension and<br />

information delivery to farmers need to be prioritized.<br />

References<br />

Komarek, A.M., de Pinto, A. and Smith, V.H. 2020. A review <strong>of</strong> types <strong>of</strong> risks in agriculture:<br />

What we know and what we need to know. Agric. Syst. 178, 102738<br />

Raju, B.M.K., Josily Samuel, Jagriti Rohit, Anshida Beevi, C.N., Rama Rao, C.A., Prasad,<br />

J.V.N.S., Prabhakar, M., Ravindra Chary, G., Singh, V.K., Bhaskar, S. and<br />

Chaudhari, S.K. 2021. Mainstreaming Climate Resilient Agriculture Technologies<br />

into National Schemes and Development Programmes: Scope and Opportunities,<br />

240 | Page<br />

Climate resilient agriculture for risk mitigation


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

ICAR-Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, NICRA, ICAR-CRIDA,<br />

Hyderabad, P.110, ISBN: 978-93-80883-68-8<br />

Samuel, J., Rao, C. A. R., Raju, B. M. K., Reddy, A. A., Pushpanjali, Reddy, A. G. K.,<br />

Kumar, R. N., Osman, M., Singh, V.K. and Prasad, J.V.N.S. 2022. Assessing the<br />

impact <strong>of</strong> climate resilient technologies in minimizing drought impacts on farm<br />

incomes in drylands. Sustainability, 14, 382.<br />

T2a-02O-1161<br />

Enhancing Water Productivity in Rainfed Agriculture through in-situ and ex-situ Rain<br />

Water Harvesting- NICRA Experiences<br />

B.V. Asewar and M.S.Pendke<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Agronomy, Vasantrao Naik Marathwada Krishi Vidyapeeth, Parbhani 431402<br />

In Marathwada region, out total cultivated area <strong>of</strong> 57.94 lakh ha, 49.60 lakh ha area is<br />

rainfed. The impact <strong>of</strong> climate change and variability in the country on agricultural<br />

production is quite evident in the recent years. The weather aberrations like drought and<br />

floods, extreme events like high intense rainfall, hail storms, heat wave, cold wave etc, are<br />

recurrent in most parts <strong>of</strong> the country during the crop growing periods. The South-West<br />

monsoon account for nearly 75% <strong>of</strong> the precipitation received in the country and exerts a<br />

strong influence on the kharif food grain production and the economy in terms <strong>of</strong> agricultural<br />

output, farmers income and price stability. The onset <strong>of</strong> South west monsoon, the amount <strong>of</strong><br />

rainfall and its distribution are crucial factors which influence the performance <strong>of</strong> agriculture.<br />

The probability <strong>of</strong> erratic monsoon rains is about 40% which implies that 4 out <strong>of</strong> 10 years<br />

there would be an adverse impact on the crop production. There is need to develop<br />

appropriate strategies to deal with such eventualities. Many contingency plans are available at<br />

different scales. However, any contingency intervention either technology related (land,<br />

water, soil, crop) or institutional and policy based, which are implemented on a real time<br />

basis in any crop growing season considered as “Real Time Contingency Plan” is the need <strong>of</strong><br />

hour to stabilize crop stands, production and income in rainfed regions. Marathwada region<br />

comprising <strong>of</strong> eight districts (Aurangabad, Beed, Hingoli, Jalna, Latur, Nanded, Osmanabad<br />

and Parbhani) is traditionally a drought-prone region. The region receives annual rainfall in<br />

the range <strong>of</strong> 500 to 1100 mm and comes under assured rainfall zone (60%), moderately high<br />

rainfall zone (20%) and scarcity zone (20%). The soils in the region are deep black and<br />

medium black. Major kharif crops <strong>of</strong> the region are cotton, soybean, pigeon pea, sorghum,<br />

green gram black gram, and pearl millet, whereas major rabi rainfed crops are rabi sorghum,<br />

safflower and chickpea. Rainfall is the key variable influencing crop productivity in rainfed<br />

farming. Intermittent and prolonged drought are the major cause <strong>of</strong> yield reduction in most <strong>of</strong><br />

the crops. Based on the farmers need, technical interventions were taken up under NICRA<br />

Climate resilient agriculture for risk mitigation<br />

241 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

(National Innovations in Climate Resilient Agriculture) action research project through<br />

preparedness and real time contingency measures.<br />

Methodology<br />

In-situ moisture conservation through conservation furrow in sole soybean and soybean<br />

+ pigeonpea (4:2): Before introduction <strong>of</strong> this project, the farmers were cultivating sole<br />

soybean crop on flat bed without opening <strong>of</strong> conservation furrow. However yield reductions<br />

were observed due to moisture stress during dryspells . Under improved practice, opening <strong>of</strong><br />

conservation furrow after every 4 rows in sole soybean and soybean + pigeon pea (4:2)<br />

intercropping after 30 to 35 days <strong>of</strong> sowing was adopted as a strategy for moisture<br />

conservation on farmers field during 2011-2015.<br />

Soybean + pigeonpea (4:2) intercropping system: Traditionally, farmers were cultivating<br />

soybean crop as sole crop which is very sensitive to moisture stress as well as excess<br />

moisture. The drastic yield reductions were observed due to dryspells. Under such<br />

circumstances soybean + pigeonpea (4:2) intercropping system was introduced and adopted<br />

on farmers field during 2011- 2015.<br />

In-situ moisture conservation through broad bed & furrow (BBF) in soybean:<br />

Performance <strong>of</strong> BBF technique for sowing <strong>of</strong> soybean on farmers field was evaluated during<br />

2014-15 to 2016-17.<br />

Results<br />

Adoption <strong>of</strong> conservation furrow technique: The effect <strong>of</strong> in-situ moisture conservation<br />

practice like conservation furrow in sole soybean on crop productivity (yield), net monetary<br />

returns, BC ratio and RWUE was analyzed.<br />

Effect <strong>of</strong> conservation furrow on crop productivity, NMR, BC ratio and RWUE<br />

Yield<br />

(kg/ha)<br />

Net<br />

returns<br />

(kg/ha)<br />

B:C<br />

ratio<br />

RWUE<br />

(kg/hamm)<br />

242 | Page<br />

Intervention/Year 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Mean<br />

Conservation<br />

furrow in Soybean<br />

1850 2620 1750 668 632 1504<br />

No furrow 1424 2146 1506 446 487 1202<br />

Conservation<br />

furrow in Soybean<br />

21017 30723 41250 10844 3024 22571<br />

No furrow 16177 21546 32710 7240 5374 18609<br />

Conservation<br />

furrow in Soybean<br />

1.52 2.53 3.06 2.02 1.61 2.14<br />

No furrow 1.16 2.07 2.63 1.34 1.42 1.72<br />

Conservation<br />

furrow in Soybean<br />

4.14 5.50 1.78 2.36 2.21 3.19<br />

No furrow 3.19 4.5 1.53 1.58 1.7 2.50<br />

Climate resilient agriculture for risk mitigation


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Results indicated that, with conservation furrow, a sole soybean yield <strong>of</strong> 1504 kg/ha was<br />

obtained with a yield advantage <strong>of</strong> 302 kg/ha over the treatment <strong>of</strong> no conservation furrow<br />

(1202 kg/ha). The net returns <strong>of</strong> Rs. 22571/ha was obtained due to adoption <strong>of</strong> conservation<br />

furrow technique and found to be higher than the net return <strong>of</strong> Rs. 18609 in no furrow<br />

system. The BC ratio under adoption <strong>of</strong> conservation furrow technique was found to be 2.14<br />

as against BC ratio <strong>of</strong> 1.72 with no furrow system. Similarly, the RWUE <strong>of</strong> 3.19 was found<br />

with conservation furrow as compared to RWUE <strong>of</strong> 2.50 in no furrow system. The effect <strong>of</strong><br />

in-situ moisture conservation practice like conservation furrow in sole soybean on crop<br />

productivity (yield), net monetary returns, BC ratio and RWUE was analyzed and the data is<br />

presented.<br />

Effect <strong>of</strong> conservation furrow on crop productivity, NMR, BC ratio and RWUE<br />

Yield<br />

(kg/ha)<br />

Net<br />

returns<br />

(kg/ha)<br />

B:C<br />

ratio<br />

Intervention/Year 2011-<br />

12<br />

Conservation furrow in<br />

Soy + PP (4:2)<br />

2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 Mean<br />

2900 1496 1610 513 1731 1650<br />

No furrow 1875 1160 1205 272 1430 1188<br />

Conservation furrow in<br />

Soy + PP (4:2)<br />

38840 38848 43180 16572 19840 31456<br />

No furrow 18750 26080 27790 8786 16390 19559<br />

Conservation furrow in<br />

Soy + PP (4:2)<br />

3.15 3.16 3.39 2.24 1.62 2.71<br />

RWUE<br />

(kg/hamm)<br />

No furrow 2.04 2.44 2.54 1.18 1.33 1.90<br />

Conservation furrow in<br />

Soy + PP (4:2)<br />

6.50 3.14 1.63 1.81 6.07 3.83<br />

No furrow 4.20 2.43 1.22 0.96 5.01 2.76<br />

In soybean + pigeonpea (4:2) intercropping system, an additional soybean equivalent yield <strong>of</strong><br />

462 kg/ha was obtained with adoption <strong>of</strong> conservation furrow technique as compared to no<br />

furrow with net monetary benefit <strong>of</strong> Rs. 11897/ha. The increase in yield and net return is due<br />

to 30 per cent more moisture conservation resulted in better crop growth and crop<br />

performance even during dry spells.<br />

Climate Resilient Technology: intercropping system: The effect <strong>of</strong> intercropping system<br />

as compared to sole crop under climatic variations over a period <strong>of</strong> years on crop productivity<br />

(yield), net monetary returns, BC ratio and RWUE was analyzed and the data is presented.<br />

Climate resilient agriculture for risk mitigation<br />

243 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Effect <strong>of</strong> intercropping on crop productivity, NMR, BC ratio and RWUE<br />

Year 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 Mean<br />

Yield<br />

(kg/ha)<br />

Net<br />

returns<br />

(kg/ha)<br />

B:C<br />

ratio<br />

RWUE<br />

(kg/hamm)<br />

Soybean +<br />

Pigeonpea(4:2)<br />

Intercropping<br />

system<br />

2464 2859 2443 1340 1731 2167<br />

Sole Soybean 1577 2251 1790 446 527 1318<br />

Soybean +<br />

Pigeonpea(4:2)<br />

Intercropping<br />

system<br />

31715 50623 61132 20164 19840 36695<br />

Sole Soybean 26494 39857 44791 6711 6040 24778<br />

Soybean +<br />

Pigeonpea(4:2)<br />

Intercropping<br />

system<br />

1.98 1.64 3.5 1.59 1.62 2.06<br />

Sole Soybean 1.44 1.29 2.56 0.52 0.49 1.26<br />

Soybean +<br />

Pigeonpea(4:2)<br />

Intercropping<br />

system<br />

5.52 6.0 2.58 4.74 6.07 4.98<br />

Sole Soybean 3.53 4.72 1.89 1.58 1.85 2.71<br />

Soybean + Pigeonpea (4:2) intercropping system recorded significantly higher soybean<br />

equivalent mean yield <strong>of</strong> 2167 kg/ha as against the sole soybean mean yield <strong>of</strong> 1318 kg/ha i.e.<br />

farmers practice over a period <strong>of</strong> five years. The mean net returns in soybean + pigeonpea<br />

intercropping system was recorded as Rs. 36695/ha as against mean sole soybean net return<br />

<strong>of</strong> Rs. 24778/ha in farmers practice. The BC ratio and RWUE was also higher in soybean:<br />

pigeonpea intercropping system as compared to sole soybean crop. During 2014 and 2015,<br />

despite <strong>of</strong> more than 50% deficit rainfall, the intercropping system sustained even in<br />

prolonged dryspell during 2015. The dryspell was occurred at flowering and pod filling stage<br />

<strong>of</strong> soybean and vegetative stage in pigeonpea.<br />

In-situ moisture conservation through broad bed & furrow (BBF) in soybean: The data<br />

on. crop yield, net return, BC ratio and RWUE under BBF technology as compared to<br />

farmers practice is presented.<br />

244 | Page<br />

Climate resilient agriculture for risk mitigation


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Comparison <strong>of</strong> BBF technique with farmers practice for soybean<br />

Soil type Intervention Mean<br />

Seed<br />

yield kg/<br />

ha<br />

Light to<br />

medium<br />

black soil<br />

Stover<br />

yield<br />

/ha<br />

kg<br />

Net returns,<br />

Rs./ha<br />

BC ratio<br />

RWUE,<br />

kg/ha-mm<br />

BBF 1337 1847 19733 1.62 2.166<br />

Farmers<br />

practice<br />

1122 1433 14384 1.46 1.79<br />

Above table indicated that due to use <strong>of</strong> BBF technology, the yield increase was recorded.<br />

Similarly, the net returns, BC ratio and RWUE was found to be higher in BBF technique as<br />

compared to farmers practice. This BBF technique was proved as climate resilient technique<br />

under changing climate.<br />

Well and bore well recharging model: An Experience in NICRA Village A National<br />

Innovations on Climate Resilient Agriculture (NICRA) project in being implemented on<br />

farmers field at village Babhulgaon Tq.Dist.Parbhani. Open well and bore well recharge<br />

technology was demonstrated on 10 and 7 farmers field through participatory mode<br />

respectively. The pre-& post monsoon water levels in the wells were monitored. Also, the<br />

aquifer characteristic viz. transmissivity and specific yield were determined. Accordingly, the<br />

ground water recharge was determined. The Recharge wells recorded higher ground water<br />

potential as compared to un-recharged wells.<br />

Conclusion<br />

Preparedness like adoption <strong>of</strong> climate resilient crops and varieties, adoption <strong>of</strong> in-situ and<br />

ex-situ moisture conservation techniques i.e. Broad bed furrow sowing method, conservation<br />

furrow, farm pond, recharging <strong>of</strong> well and bore wells and intercropping system plays a<br />

crucial role in dryland agriculture for sustaining crop productivity. The Broad Bed and<br />

Furrow sowing technique (BBF) was found to be most efficient climate resilient technology<br />

under variable climatic conditions over a period <strong>of</strong> 5 years with respect to yield enhancement<br />

and thereby the increased net returns. Also, BBF technique resulted in more moisture<br />

conservation as reflected by mean soil moisture status.<br />

References<br />

Ramchandraapa B.K., Thimmegowda, M.N., Satish, A., Jagadeesh, B.N., Devaraja, K.,<br />

Srikanth Babu, P.N., Sativa. M.S. 2016. Real time contingency measures to cope with<br />

rainfall variability in southern Karnataka. Ind. J. Dryland Agric. Res. and Dev. 31(1):<br />

37-43.<br />

Climate resilient agriculture for risk mitigation<br />

245 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

T2a-03O-1238<br />

Climate Resilient Technologies for Sustainable Farm Incomes in Kurnool<br />

District <strong>of</strong> Andhra Pradesh<br />

G. Dhanalakshmi, M. Sudhakar Scientist, E. Ravi Goud and P. Vishnu Mohan Reddy<br />

SHE &CS, Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Yagantipalli. Kurnool dist. A.P-518124<br />

The improved agricultural practices evolved for diverse agro-ecological regions in India have<br />

potential to enhance climate change adaptation. Adaptation is the most prudent tool to face the<br />

losses due to climate change. Resiliency is the ability <strong>of</strong> a system to absorb shocks and recover as<br />

quickly as possible to normal conditions. NICRA is an ICAR initiative launched in 151 climate<br />

vulnerable districts across the country. A number <strong>of</strong> climate resilient technologies were<br />

demonstrated and capacity building <strong>of</strong> farmers was done in the project. The present study made<br />

an attempt to investigate the perception <strong>of</strong> farmers on climate change, their adoption and their<br />

economic returns through adoption <strong>of</strong> the technologies and use <strong>of</strong> Agro Advisory Services using<br />

ex- post facto research design. Kurnool was selected purposively as the locale <strong>of</strong> the study.<br />

Majority <strong>of</strong> the farmers are middle aged with high school education and are small farmers with<br />

good mass media exposure and medium extension contact. Majority <strong>of</strong> the farmers have high<br />

level <strong>of</strong> perception on climate change and its impact on agriculture in terms <strong>of</strong> increase in cost<br />

<strong>of</strong> cultivation, low yields due to dry spells and incidence <strong>of</strong> pest and diseases. Majority <strong>of</strong> the<br />

farmers are adopting climate resilient technologies. Eighty-four per cent <strong>of</strong> the farmers in<br />

Kurnool district are adopting conservation furrows and 92 per cent are adopting drought tolerant<br />

varieties and intercropping <strong>of</strong> red gram and setaria. Calf registration and establishment <strong>of</strong> fodder<br />

banks are highly adopted by the farmers in livestock management.<br />

Independent variables are highly correlated to perception and adoption <strong>of</strong> the climate resilient<br />

technologies. The study also revealed that renovation <strong>of</strong> percolation tank helped in increasing the<br />

cropping intensity. Intercropping <strong>of</strong> setaria and red gram gave additional net returns <strong>of</strong> Rs<br />

15,620/ha. Drought tolerant jowar variety NJ2446, Bengal gram NBeG-3 and medium duration<br />

red gram variety PRG-176 gave additional net returns over farmers’ practice. Calf mortality was<br />

reduced by 66 per cent and use <strong>of</strong> urea molasses and silage feeding to animal proved beneficial.<br />

Most <strong>of</strong> weather based agro advisory services given were pest and disease management followed<br />

by crop production, horticulture and livestock. Majority <strong>of</strong> the farmers felt that the services were<br />

utilized in selection <strong>of</strong> drought tolerant varieties and most <strong>of</strong> them strongly agreed that the<br />

messages were received in right time for control <strong>of</strong> pest and diseases. Fifty-eight per cent strongly<br />

agreed crop management advisories helped to increase their crop yields and fifty three percent<br />

strongly agreed cost <strong>of</strong> supplementary irrigation was reduced followed by total cost <strong>of</strong> cultivation<br />

<strong>of</strong> the crop and most <strong>of</strong> the farmers understood the message received. The study gave insight for<br />

the policy makers to emulate NICRA modules across the country and to redesign the already<br />

existing models with climate change perspective as it became a part <strong>of</strong> Indian farming.<br />

246 | Page<br />

Climate resilient agriculture for risk mitigation


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

T2a-04O-1415<br />

Climate Change Adaptation Models for the Major Farming System<br />

Typologies in Sundarbans<br />

P. K. Garain 1 , C. K. Mondal 1 , F. H. Rahman 2 and A. Saha 1<br />

1<br />

Ramkrishna Ashram KVK, Nimpith, South 24 Parganas, West Bengal – 743338, India;<br />

2 ICAR-Agricultural Technology Application Research Institute, Bhumi Vihar Complex, Block- GB,<br />

Sector- III, Salt Lake, Kolkata-700097, West Bengal, India.<br />

An increased impact <strong>of</strong> climate change on the carbon balance, water cycle, biodiversity,<br />

agricultural productivity and food security is predominant problem globally (Jain et al.,<br />

2013). The effect <strong>of</strong> climate change is being felt worldwide but the low lying coastal agroecosystems<br />

are more vulnerable and likely to experience increasing frequency <strong>of</strong> storm surge<br />

events, floods, coastal erosion and disastrous cyclones, in the coming decades. The Indian<br />

Sundarbans is highly vulnerable to such climatic adversities. There is a gradual decrease in<br />

total rainfall and rainy days and an increase in intensive rain spells (>60 mm per day) as well<br />

as increase in dry spells during monsoon period. Heavy rainfall during Kharif (rainy season<br />

crop) season and delayed monsoon are also common phenomena in this area (Nandargi and<br />

Barman, 2018). Intensive rainfall within short period <strong>of</strong> time leads to prolonged submergence<br />

<strong>of</strong> the ill drained and low-lying crop fields. Long duration and low yielding traditional rice<br />

varieties are the only option. The densely populated low-lying areas create an additional high<br />

risk and vulnerability from the impact <strong>of</strong> such tropical cyclones. There is a steep rise in the<br />

frequency <strong>of</strong> severe cyclonic storms during the last century over the Bay <strong>of</strong> Bengal<br />

(Chakraborty, 2015). During the last three decades the northern part <strong>of</strong> Bay <strong>of</strong> Bengal has<br />

witnessed seven severe cyclones - Sidr, Nargis, Bijli, Aila, Fani, Bulbul and Amphan. All<br />

these climatic vagaries add anguish to the coastal livelihood <strong>of</strong> the 4.5 million people residing<br />

in the area, who primarily depend on forest resources and agriculture for their sustenance.<br />

Hence, migration to the nearby towns, in search <strong>of</strong> alternate livelihood, is very common.<br />

Methodology<br />

A study was conducted to assess climatic vulnerabilities, under “National Innovations on<br />

Climate Resilient Agriculture” (NICRA) by Ramkrishna Ashram Krishi Vigyan Kendra<br />

(RAKVK), in collaboration with Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture (ICAR-<br />

CRIDA), Hyderabad and Agricultural Technology Application Research Institute (ICAR-<br />

ATARI) Kolkata from 2011 to 2021, in the cyclone prone villages <strong>of</strong> Sundarbans (NICRA<br />

News, 2011).<br />

The study was conducted in Bongheri village under the Kultali block <strong>of</strong> the South 24<br />

Parganas district in West Bengal (Latitude: 22 o 2’3” N to 22 o 3’11” N; Longitude: 88 o 37’5” E<br />

to 88 o 38’11” E). to assess different set <strong>of</strong> technological packages on the five existing farming<br />

Climate resilient agriculture for risk mitigation<br />

247 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

system typologies <strong>of</strong> the area (rainfed lowland, rainfed medium land, irrigated lowland,<br />

irrigated medium land and irrigated upland),. Five different packages <strong>of</strong> climate resilient<br />

technologies like mangrove barrier, land shaping, land embankment cultivation, broad bed<br />

cum trench system, flood and salinity tolerant crop varieties, animal health management,<br />

alternate livelihood options (backyard poultry, Asian catfish hatchery, ornamental bird),<br />

community seedbed, custom hiring centre, etc., were demonstrated (Table).. In each typology<br />

the data <strong>of</strong> demonstration plots were compared with the farmers plot following traditional<br />

farming practices from 2019-21.<br />

Results<br />

All interventions under different farming system typologies resulted in significant increase in<br />

net income over the traditional system. The rainfed medium land situation with crop +<br />

livestock farming system showed highest response (409% increase in net income). Even<br />

during cyclonic disturbances (Fani and Bulbul in 2019, Amphan in 2020 and Yaas in 2021)<br />

the village sustained farming activities as the river embankment was intact due to the<br />

mangrove barrier created during the project period.<br />

Lowland situation is most vulnerable to prolonged submergence during cyclones and<br />

intensive rainfall. Community based activities like mangrove restoration and rejuvenation <strong>of</strong><br />

drainage canals were found to be important to provide climate resilience in the project<br />

village. Modification <strong>of</strong> land topography (through land embankment cultivation and broad<br />

bed cum furrow system) in this situation are important to increase crop diversity. Alternate<br />

livelihood support (through catfish hatchery & backyard poultry) also increased the overall<br />

farm income. The medium and upland situation is most vulnerable to dry spells in monsoon<br />

and acute irrigation scarcity during winter and summer. Rainwater harvesting through land<br />

shaping and desiltation <strong>of</strong> existing ponds assured irrigation. Modification <strong>of</strong> land topography<br />

(land shaping) was found to be important to increase cropping intensity. Availability <strong>of</strong> fresh<br />

pond water throughout the year helped to perform fishery and improve the overall net<br />

income. Dependence on mono-cropping increases vulnerability during a climatic hazard.<br />

Diversification in farming through effective integration <strong>of</strong> crop, livestock and fish helped the<br />

farmers to get assured income.<br />

Income from different climate resilient technology packages (average <strong>of</strong> 2019 to 2021)<br />

248 | Page<br />

Climate resilient agriculture for risk mitigation


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Existing Farming<br />

System Typologies<br />

Interventions based on farming system typology<br />

Rainfed<br />

lowland<br />

(crop +<br />

livestock)<br />

Farmers Practice Rice +<br />

greengram +<br />

livestock<br />

Predominant<br />

and<br />

constraints<br />

Climate resilient technology packages demonstrated<br />

climatic<br />

resource<br />

Land<br />

development<br />

Croplivestock-fish<br />

Others<br />

Conclusion<br />

Saline water<br />

intrusion,<br />

submergence,<br />

low crop &<br />

animal<br />

productivity,<br />

excess soil<br />

moisture delays<br />

crop sowing in<br />

Rabi season<br />

Land<br />

embankment<br />

cultivation,<br />

broad bed cum<br />

trench system<br />

SUDHA<br />

method <strong>of</strong><br />

Rice<br />

Paddy cum<br />

fish<br />

Short<br />

duration<br />

greengram<br />

Backyard<br />

poultry<br />

Asian<br />

catfish<br />

hatchery<br />

with<br />

ro<strong>of</strong>top<br />

rainwater<br />

harvesting<br />

Rainfed medium<br />

land<br />

(crop + livestock)<br />

Rice + lathyrus +<br />

livestock<br />

Saline water<br />

intrusion,<br />

submergence, low<br />

productivity <strong>of</strong><br />

crops & animals<br />

Land shaping<br />

Submergence<br />

and salt<br />

tolerant, HYV<br />

Rice +<br />

vegetables<br />

Backyard<br />

poultry<br />

Asian catfish<br />

hatchery with<br />

ro<strong>of</strong>top<br />

rainwater<br />

harvesting<br />

Irrigated<br />

lowland<br />

(crop +<br />

livestock)<br />

Rice +<br />

greengram +<br />

livestock<br />

Saline water<br />

intrusion,<br />

submergence,<br />

low crop &<br />

animal<br />

productivity <strong>of</strong>,<br />

excess soil<br />

moisture delays<br />

crop sowing in<br />

Rabi season<br />

Land<br />

embankment<br />

cultivation<br />

SUDHA<br />

method <strong>of</strong><br />

Rice<br />

Paddy cum<br />

fish<br />

Short<br />

duration<br />

greengram<br />

Sprinkler<br />

irrigation<br />

Backyard<br />

poultry<br />

Asian<br />

catfish<br />

hatchery<br />

Irrigated medium<br />

land<br />

(crop + fish +<br />

livestock)<br />

Rice + vegetable +<br />

fish + livestock<br />

Submergence, soil<br />

salinity in winter<br />

and summer,<br />

ponds silted up,<br />

low fish<br />

productivity, poor<br />

farm<br />

mechanization<br />

Desiltation,<br />

embankment<br />

cultivation<br />

land<br />

Submergence<br />

and salt<br />

tolerant, HYV<br />

Rice +<br />

vegetables<br />

Sprinkler<br />

irrigation<br />

Mixed fish<br />

culture<br />

Green fodder<br />

Irrigated<br />

upland<br />

(crop + fish +<br />

livestock)<br />

Rice +<br />

vegetable + fish<br />

+ livestock<br />

Ponds silted up,<br />

soil salinity in<br />

winter and<br />

summer, lack <strong>of</strong><br />

green fodder,<br />

fish productivity<br />

low, poor farm<br />

mechanization<br />

Desiltation<br />

farm pond<br />

<strong>of</strong><br />

Improved<br />

varieties<br />

INM and<br />

IPM,<br />

mulching,<br />

Sprinkler<br />

irrigation<br />

Mixed fish<br />

culture<br />

Green<br />

fodder<br />

Restoration <strong>of</strong> Mangrove nursery, Rejuvenation <strong>of</strong> drainage canal, Custom hiring centre, Animal<br />

health camp, Community seedbed<br />

Sundarban has a complex farming system typology. Specific packages <strong>of</strong> climate resilient<br />

technologies are required to address the specific problems. Improvement <strong>of</strong> drainage,<br />

rainwater harvesting, stress tolerant varieties and farm based alternate livelihood<br />

opportunities helped to improve climate resilience.<br />

Climate resilient agriculture for risk mitigation<br />

249 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

References<br />

Chakraborty, S. 2015. Investigating the impact <strong>of</strong> severe cyclone Aila and the role <strong>of</strong> disaster<br />

management department—A study <strong>of</strong> Kultali block <strong>of</strong> Sundarban. Am. J. Theo. Appl.<br />

Business. 1(1): 6–13.<br />

Jain, S. K., Kumar, V. and Saharia, M. 2013. Analysis <strong>of</strong> rainfall and temperature trends in<br />

northeast India. Int. J. Clim. 33(4): 968–978.<br />

Nandargi, S. S. and Barman, K. 2018. Evaluation <strong>of</strong> climate change impact on rainfall<br />

variation in West Bengal. Acta Scientifc Agric. 2(7): 74–82.<br />

T2a-05O-1509<br />

Crop Production Interventions for Reducing the Impact <strong>of</strong> Changing<br />

Climate in North East<br />

Bagish Kumar, M. Thoithoi Devi, Abul K. Azad and Rajesh Kumar<br />

ICAR-Agricultural Technology Application Research Institute, Zone-VI, Guwahati, Assam,<br />

India<br />

The human interventions to the nature during the last century has shown its result in the last<br />

couple <strong>of</strong> decades in the form <strong>of</strong> climate change. The aberrant weather scenario is the<br />

showcase <strong>of</strong> climate change. As the agriculture is mainly dependent on the natural weather<br />

phenomenon, so it has been highly affected by the climate change. NICRA is one <strong>of</strong> the<br />

flagship initiative <strong>of</strong> the ICAR to make agriculture more resilient to climate change. It was<br />

also undertaken by the KVKs <strong>of</strong> Assam and Arunachal Pradesh in North east. During 2018-<br />

19, KVK Dibrugarh, Assam introduced submergence tolerant paddy variety Ranjit Sub-1 in<br />

farmers field to replace the normal sali paddy in the highly flood prone area because Ranjit<br />

Sub-1 can endure underwater condition for two weeks without losing their potential yield.<br />

Yield obtained for local check and demonstration were 32.8 q/ha and 41.7 q/ha respectively.<br />

Increase in yield over local check was 27.13%. In Dibrugarh district <strong>of</strong> Assam, after<br />

harvesting <strong>of</strong> winter paddy, area remains fallow from December to June. For enhancing the<br />

production and productivity, short duration early ahu (autumn) paddy variety Dishang was<br />

introduced during March/April-June July. Yield <strong>of</strong> local check and demonstration were 32.8<br />

q/ha and 42.8 q/ha respectively. KVK Dibrugarh, Assam introduced high yielding toria<br />

variety TS – 36 with the aim <strong>of</strong> utilizing rice fallow and producing higher yield. Yield <strong>of</strong><br />

local check and demonstration were 8.0 q/ha and 11.8q/ha respectively. Increase in yield over<br />

local check was 47.50% with B:C ratio <strong>of</strong> 1.65. KVK Dhubri, Assam introduced<br />

submergence tolerant paddy variety Swarna Sub-1 to overcome the flash flood situation in<br />

the district. Yield <strong>of</strong> local check and demonstration were 33.5q/ha and 39.0q/ha respectively.<br />

Increase in yield over local check was 16.42%. KVK Dhubri also introduced submergence<br />

250 | Page<br />

Climate resilient agriculture for risk mitigation


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

tolerance paddy variety Ranjit Sub-1. Ranjit Sub-1 gave a yield <strong>of</strong> 43.5 q/ha as compared to<br />

local check (32.0q/ha). Increase in yield over local check was 35.94%. In Dhubri, due to<br />

water stagnation during kharif, farmers were unable to transplant HYV <strong>of</strong> paddy at<br />

appropriate time with proper seedling age resulting in yield loss. It also revealed that flood<br />

damages kharif paddy during July to August even when transplanting was done in time. To<br />

overcome this situation, staggered planting high yielding paddy variety Gitesh having<br />

flexibility in respect <strong>of</strong> seedling age from 30-60 days was demonstrated in the farmers’ field.<br />

Gitesh gave an average yield <strong>of</strong> 39.8 q/ha as compared to local check resulting in 39.16%<br />

more yield than local check. In Tirap district <strong>of</strong> Arunachal Pradesh, major problem in maize<br />

cultivation was poor early growth and performance <strong>of</strong> maize due to insufficient soil moisture<br />

and quality deterioration <strong>of</strong> cob due to coinciding <strong>of</strong> harvesting time with pre-monsoon<br />

shower. In order to address these problems, sowing time <strong>of</strong> summer maize was advanced It<br />

was observed that advancement in sowing time <strong>of</strong> summer maize resulted in yield <strong>of</strong> 40.7<br />

q/ha as compared to check (29.8 q/ha). Increase in yield over local check was 36.58% with<br />

B:C ratio <strong>of</strong> 2.19.<br />

T2a-05aO-1339<br />

An Integrated Index <strong>of</strong> Climate, Carbon, Yield, and Sustainability for<br />

Identification <strong>of</strong> Resilient Management Options under Cereal-based<br />

Cropping System<br />

N. Subash * , D. Dutta, P.C. Ghasal, Omkar Singh and Brahmdutt<br />

1 Indian Council <strong>of</strong> Agricultural Research-Indian Institute <strong>of</strong> Farming Systems Research (ICAR-<br />

IIFSR), Modipuram, Meerut, Uttar Pradesh, India.<br />

*nsubashpdfsr@gmail.com/n.subash@icar.gov.in<br />

India is considered the "food basket <strong>of</strong> South Asia", particularly its most productive Indo-<br />

Gangetic Plains However, projections indicate that the average climate over India is likely to<br />

be warmer under business-as-usual (between Representation Concentration Pathway (RCP)<br />

6.0 and RCP 8.5) by 1.7 to 2.0 O C for 2030 and by 3.3–4.8 O C for the 2080 compared to the<br />

pre-industrial times. Precipitation is expected to increase by 5–6% in the 2030 and by 6–14%<br />

in the 2080. Changes in temperature and rainfall patterns can have a great impact on the<br />

organic matter and processes that take place in our soils. A farm level study found that rice<br />

yields will decline by 8–23% in the 2050 under RCP 8.5, whereas wheat yields will also<br />

decline by 6–29% under the current agricultural production system. Much <strong>of</strong> this variation is<br />

due to the variability <strong>of</strong> farm-level management practices. Under tropical conditions,<br />

continuous cropping without the addition <strong>of</strong> organic matter may further reduce soil health and<br />

crop productivity. In locations with high initial soil organic carbon (SOC), depletion <strong>of</strong> SOC<br />

was noticed due to continuous cropping, whereas SOC increased significantly at locations<br />

Climate resilient agriculture for risk mitigation<br />

251 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

with low initial SOC in the rice-wheat cropping system. Cereal-based cropping system, an<br />

integral part <strong>of</strong> the agricultural food system <strong>of</strong> India depends on site-specific integrated<br />

nutrient management (INM) practices. Resilience is closely linked to low yield variability<br />

due to climate aberrations, higher soil carbon buildup, higher yield and sustainability. The<br />

predominant cereal-based cropping systems in South Asia are rice-rice, rice-wheat,<br />

pearlmillet-wheat, sorghum-wheat, rice-maize, maize-wheat and rice-mustard. In this study,<br />

we analyzed the response <strong>of</strong> long-term application <strong>of</strong> INM on yield sustainability <strong>of</strong><br />

important cropping systems through the quantification <strong>of</strong> climate change parameters and<br />

changes in SOC with respect to cropping systems and climate variability and change.<br />

Finally, we developed a composite resilient index (CRI) as a function <strong>of</strong> yield sustainability,<br />

climate variability, SOC changes and opportunity for yield enhancement.<br />

Methodology<br />

Long-term experimental data from 28 sites representing different agro-ecological zones <strong>of</strong><br />

India, recorded under AICRP-IFS data under different integrated management treatments<br />

were used to investigate for predominant cereal-based cropping systems viz., rice-rice, ricewheat,<br />

pearlmillet-wheat, sorghum-wheat, rice-maize, maize-wheat and rice-mustard during<br />

the period 1980-2015. In this study, all four factors, yield advantages, sustainability, climate<br />

variability, and soil fertility considered to develop the integrated index. Equal weightage was<br />

given to sustainability, climate, organic carbon, yield and based on the order <strong>of</strong> value <strong>of</strong> CRI,<br />

primary, secondary, and tertiary site-specific resilient integrated nutrient management<br />

practices were identified for all the sites with respect to different cereal based cropping<br />

systems.<br />

Results<br />

All the indices, viz., Sustainability yield index, coefficient <strong>of</strong> variation index, soil organic<br />

carbon index, and yield gap index were worked out separately for all the treatments, and the<br />

best treatments were identified based on the highest value <strong>of</strong> index in each category. As per<br />

the formula, with equal weightage <strong>of</strong> 0.25 assigned to each index and estimating the<br />

composite resilient index (CRI) based on the highest value, the respective management<br />

practices identified. This will be a "mid-way" path <strong>of</strong> management practices, which is smart<br />

and resilient with respect to sustainability, higher yield, less climate variability, and good for<br />

soil carbon. Three options for different stakeholders, based on the highest three composite<br />

resilient indices; primary, secondary, and tertiary management options, will provide different<br />

stakeholders with options based on local availability <strong>of</strong> resources. 50% substitution <strong>of</strong><br />

nitrogen through green manure along with remaining recommended dose <strong>of</strong> fertilizer is the<br />

best management option to address sustainability-yield gap- low climatic variability and for<br />

high soil organic carbon buildup under rice-rice system in Rajendranagar. Similarly,<br />

identified site specific management option for other cropping systems also. The assessment<br />

252 | Page<br />

Climate resilient agriculture for risk mitigation


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

framework for the CRI is unique because it addresses the climate-carbon-yield-sustainability<br />

nexus under different cropping systems and different management practices options. Crop<br />

production is the function <strong>of</strong> weather conditions, soil, inputs, crop area, government<br />

incentives. Technological inputs have been growing steadily and are difficult to quantify, but<br />

the strict protocols <strong>of</strong> multi-specialized scientific <strong>of</strong>ficials involved in data recording and<br />

experimentation. The identified primary, secondary and tertiary site-specific resilient<br />

management practices under different cropping systems provide options to stakeholders,<br />

especially farmers and policy makers. CRI provides researchers, particularly plant breeders,<br />

with the opportunity to develop improved varieties; agronomists with the opportunity to<br />

develop/identify better management options; and plant physiologists with the opportunity to<br />

change crop geometry in future thinking and research to accommodate more partitioning to<br />

yield. As far as the farmer’s field is concerned, the resiliency is entirely different because, in<br />

addition to these four factors, several other socio-economic and location-specific<br />

characteristics prevail. The yield gap with respect to site-specific INM options versus district<br />

yield indicates that with site-specific intervention <strong>of</strong> already available management options,<br />

food security can be sustained and also address the local level impact <strong>of</strong> climate variability<br />

effects due to global climate change. There is a need to assess the same methodological<br />

framework <strong>of</strong> the composite resilient index concept at farmers' fields with intensive and<br />

accurate data collection <strong>of</strong> soil and management practices followed under different cropping<br />

systems, especially pertaining to the first, second, and third predominant cropping systems.<br />

T2a-06R-1010<br />

Evaluation <strong>of</strong> Yield Performance in High Yielding Finger Millet Varieties<br />

in NICRA Villages <strong>of</strong> Ganjam<br />

S. Mangaraj 1 , P. K. Panda 1 , S. K. Satapathy 1 , P. J. Mishra 1 , F. H. Rahman 2 and<br />

A. Mishra 1<br />

1 Odisha University <strong>of</strong> Agriculture & Technology, Bhubaneswar, Odisha-751003, India;<br />

2 ICAR- Agricultural Technology Application Research Institute Kolkata, Bhumi Vihar Complex, Salt<br />

Lake, Kolkata–700097, India.<br />

Finger millet, well known as ragi (Eleusine coracana L.) is a non-glutenaceous nutri-cereal<br />

placed third in the country with respect to area and production and has noteworthiness in<br />

having the highest productivity among major and minor millets after sorghum and bajra.<br />

Finger millet is a nutritionally rich millet having 5-8% protein, 1.3% fat, 344 mg calcium, 70-<br />

76% slow releasing carbohydrate, 15-35 % dietary fibre, 2.86% lysine and 1.5-3.5% mineral<br />

which is being promoted as safe food for different co-morbid patients (Sebastin et al., 2005).<br />

Millets are grown in harsh environments and the performance <strong>of</strong> the variety is linked to its<br />

ability to adjust to fluctuating edaphic and climatic situations. Generally, farmers cultivate<br />

Climate resilient agriculture for risk mitigation<br />

253 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

finger millet by using locally available varieties and save their seeds for next season too. Due<br />

to uninterrupted cultivation <strong>of</strong> the same and local varieties, farmers suffer from the reduction<br />

in yield. Actually, the crop is always grown in marginal land and in rainfed ecosystem <strong>of</strong> the<br />

state. In Southern Odisha, harsh and adverse climatic conditions coupled with marginal soils<br />

make agricultural production system unfavourable due to high risk <strong>of</strong> unpredictability during<br />

kharif season. One possible solution is to identify and increase the yield <strong>of</strong> finger millet that<br />

is highly adaptive to local climate, have high nutrient value and can efficiently withstand<br />

biotic and/or abiotic stresses. However, the new high yielding varieties should not be directly<br />

dissipated to the farming communities for large scale production before they are assessed for<br />

their performance. Standardisation <strong>of</strong> suitable varieties for a particular area is <strong>of</strong> prime<br />

importance to perceive the yield potential <strong>of</strong> finger millet. Their potential for enhanced<br />

nutritive value and climate resilient agriculture are also understudied.<br />

Ganjam district in the state <strong>of</strong> Odisha in India is delineated by a year-round equable<br />

temperature and high humidity, coastal area in particular. Normally, annual rainfall <strong>of</strong> the<br />

district is 1302 mm. About 80% <strong>of</strong> annual rainfall is received during S-W monsoon. On an<br />

average; there are 65 rainy days a year in district. The prevailing soil texture in the area is<br />

mostly sandy loam. Agricultural activity is primarily rainfed, and kharif (June–September) is<br />

the primary cropping season. The poor and marginal famers usually grow local landraces <strong>of</strong><br />

finger millet, viz. budha mandia, nali mandia, and tholi mandia, using traditional agronomic<br />

practices. Finger millet is mostly cultivated in kharif on marginal lands in the upland with<br />

few or no external inputs, either as a pure crop or with a range <strong>of</strong> pulses, legumes and<br />

oilseeds under mixed cropping systems. Further, due to traditional cultivation practices, the<br />

grain yield is as low as 5-7 q/ha under broadcasting method, and even with traditional<br />

transplanting methods yield, it is only 7-9 q/ha. So there is an immediate requirement for<br />

enhancing the productivity <strong>of</strong> finger millet as well as to reach the potential <strong>of</strong> high yielding<br />

varieties. Keeping this point in view, an on-farm testing <strong>of</strong> high yielding finger millet<br />

varieties was taken up by Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Ganjam-I to assess the production potential<br />

<strong>of</strong> HYVs <strong>of</strong> finger millet in NICRA villages through NICRA project.<br />

Methodology<br />

The study was carried out through on farm testing in kharif-2019 at NICRA villages i.e. Nada<br />

(19.9202˚ N, 84.7517˚ E), Chikili (19.5564˚ N, 85.0052˚ E), and Chopara (19.9522˚ N,<br />

84.7592˚ E) <strong>of</strong> Ganjam district under <strong>of</strong> Odisha with an objective to evaluate suitable ragi<br />

varieties in Ganjam. The site <strong>of</strong> experiment was sandy loam in texture, slightly acidic in<br />

reaction (pH 6.12), Low in organic carbon (0.48 %), low in available nitrogen (202.6 kg/ha),<br />

medium in available phosphorus (18.6 kg/ha) and high in available potassium (289.2 kg/ha).<br />

The soil has good drainage capacity. The experiment was laid out in kharif season (June to<br />

October) <strong>of</strong> 2021 in a randomized block design (RBD) with four treatments (T1: Farmers’<br />

254 | Page<br />

Climate resilient agriculture for risk mitigation


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

practice with traditional farming practices, T2: Bhairabi with improved package <strong>of</strong> practices,<br />

T3: Arjuna with improved package <strong>of</strong> practices and T4: Kalua with improved package <strong>of</strong><br />

practices) and ten replications taking each farmer as a separate entity. The allocated land area<br />

to each farmer was equally split into four treatments to fit all the varieties. Finger millet<br />

nursery was done with seed rate <strong>of</strong> 10 kg/ha. Transplanting <strong>of</strong> 21 days old seedlings with<br />

spacing <strong>of</strong> 20 cm × 10 cm was done. Application <strong>of</strong> 100% RDF (40:20:20 kg N-P 2O 5-<br />

K2O/ha) and timely weeding and need-based plant protection measures were carried out.<br />

Basal application <strong>of</strong> half <strong>of</strong> nitrogen, total phosphorus and potash were applied over the main<br />

field just before transplanting. Remaining half <strong>of</strong> nitrogen was applied 21 DAT depending on<br />

soil moisture availability.<br />

Results<br />

Perusal data from the figure 1 revealed that Cultivation <strong>of</strong> Arjuna with improved package <strong>of</strong><br />

practices resulted in significantly higher number <strong>of</strong> fingers/panicle (10.2) and grain yield<br />

(18.27 q/ha) than farmers’ practice <strong>of</strong> growing local varieties (4.8 and 10.04 q/ha,<br />

respectively). This is closely followed by cultivation <strong>of</strong> Kalua (7.8 and 16.02 q/ha,<br />

respectively) and Bhairabi (6.2 and13.22 q/ha, respectively).<br />

Conclusion<br />

Grain yield <strong>of</strong> high yielding ragi varieties<br />

(T1: Farmers’ practice T2: Bhairabi T3: Arjuna T4:Kalua)<br />

From the field experiment, it was concluded that Cultivation <strong>of</strong> Arjuna with improved<br />

package <strong>of</strong> practices performs better than cultivation <strong>of</strong> farmers’ local varieties in Ganjam<br />

district <strong>of</strong> Odisha. Thus, existing varieties <strong>of</strong> local ragi varieties may be replaced with high<br />

yielding Arjuna variety due to its superior agronomic performance.<br />

Climate resilient agriculture for risk mitigation<br />

255 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Reference<br />

Sebastin, L., Gowri, S. and Prakash, J. 2005. Quality characteristics <strong>of</strong> finger millet –<br />

incorporated Chakli – An Indian Deep-fried product. J. Food Proc. Preserv. 29(5-6):<br />

319-330.<br />

T2a-07R-1054<br />

Real-time Contingency Planning and Preparedness to Cope with Weather<br />

Aberrations in Agriculture: Experiences from NICRA<br />

S.B. Patil 1* , M.S. Shirahatti 1 , R.A. Nandagavi 1 , B.H. Kumara 1 , U.M. Momin 1 ,<br />

H.S. Patil 1 and G. Ravindrachary 2<br />

1 AICRP for Dryland Agriculture, Regional Agricultural Research Station, Vijayapura 586 101,<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad, Karnataka; 2 AICRP for Dryland Agriculture, ICAR-<br />

CRIDA, Hyderabad 500059, Telangana<br />

*patilsb13617@uasd.in<br />

Weather aberrations make rainfed agriculture highly vulnerable, risk-prone and <strong>of</strong>ten<br />

unpr<strong>of</strong>itable, impacting the livelihoods <strong>of</strong> smallholders. A range <strong>of</strong> dryland technologies are<br />

needed to deal droughts before they occur or when they are in progress. Several national<br />

initiatives were launched in India for climate change research, and significant among them is<br />

National Initiative on Climate Resilient Agriculture (NICRA) by the ICAR. Strategic and<br />

anticipated research to understand the significant role <strong>of</strong> climate variability on rainfed<br />

agriculture is being pursued at a greater depth. There is an immediate need to demonstrate<br />

appropriate contingent measures to make rainfed agriculture resilient, economically viable<br />

and environmentally sustainable. The real-time contingency interventions included crops,<br />

varieties, rainwater conservation, efficient utilization, and various crop management<br />

practices. Any contingency measure, either technology-related (land, soil, water, crop) or<br />

institutional and policy-based, which is implemented based on real-time weather patterns<br />

(including extreme events) in any crop growing season, is considered as Real Time<br />

Contingency Planning (RTCP). Timely and effective RTCP implementation during the<br />

delayed onset <strong>of</strong> monsoon, seasonal droughts and floods resulted in better crop performance,<br />

higher agricultural production, better incomes and overall stability in household livelihoods<br />

(Srinivasa Rao et al., 2013). The RTCP at Vijayapura center was implemented with twopronged<br />

approaches, i.e., preparedness and real-time contingency measures. The experiences<br />

<strong>of</strong> AICRPDA-Vijayapura on the RTCP implemented in NICRA villages are highlighted.<br />

Methodology<br />

Vijayapura is in the Karnataka plateau (AESR3), and the climate is hot arid. The average<br />

annual rainfall is 594 mm, with a potential evaporation <strong>of</strong> 622 mm. The length <strong>of</strong> the growing<br />

256 | Page<br />

Climate resilient agriculture for risk mitigation


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

period is 90-120 days. Drought is common and occurs once in five years. The soils are<br />

shallow to deep loamy and clayey, mixed red and black soils. The dominant rainfed crops<br />

during kharif are pigeonpea and green gram, rabi crops are sorghum and chickpea. The<br />

NICRA sites are located at the Kavalagi and Honnutagi villages <strong>of</strong> Vijayapura district. The<br />

interventions on various dryland technologies have been implemented in the NICRA village<br />

from 2011-12. Since the project's inception at the AICRPDA-Vijayapura center, different<br />

weather aberrations like the delayed onset <strong>of</strong> monsoon, mid-season drought, terminal drought<br />

and extreme events like untimely excess rainfall events were experienced in NICRA villages.<br />

To overcome these situations and reduce crop losses, various RTCPs and preparedness were<br />

implemented, including crops and varieties change, soil, rainwater conservation and<br />

utilization, and different agronomic practices were demonstrated in a contiguous area in the<br />

village. In selecting the beneficiaries, the farmers most vulnerable to climatic variability, and<br />

the smallholders were given priority. It was also ensured that each demonstration had a<br />

control plot for all the implemented interventions to assess the impact <strong>of</strong> interventions in a<br />

short period. The details <strong>of</strong> RTCP implemented during various weather aberrations are<br />

presented in Table.<br />

RTCP for various weather aberrations implemented in NICRA villages<br />

Weather aberrations<br />

Delayed onset <strong>of</strong><br />

monsoon<br />

Early season drought<br />

Mid-season drought<br />

Terminal drought<br />

Interventions<br />

Change <strong>of</strong> crop/variety depends on the farming situation, soil, rainfall and<br />

cropping pattern<br />

Resowing, thinning, removal <strong>of</strong> alternate row, weeding, inter cultivation<br />

and opening <strong>of</strong> conservation furrow<br />

Repeated inter cultivation, KNO 3 @ 0.5% spray, supplemental irrigation<br />

Harvest pearl millet for fodder, protective irrigation, prepare for rabi crops<br />

Results<br />

The real-time contingency measures were implemented in the selected villages to cope with<br />

various weather aberrations and enhance yield at the field level. NICRA villages have<br />

experienced the delayed onset <strong>of</strong> monsoon some years since its inception. Under this<br />

situation, we implemented the RTCPs, like changing crops and varieties. In 2021-22, the<br />

onset <strong>of</strong> the monsoon was normal. The improved varieties <strong>of</strong> green gram (BGS-9 and<br />

DGGV-7) and pigeonpea variety (TS-3R) were introduced in farmers' fields, replacing local<br />

varieties. The improved pigeonpea variety TS-3R recorded 24.99% increase, and green gram<br />

varieties DGGV-7 and BGS-9 noticed an increase <strong>of</strong> 31.73 and 24.19%, respectively, higher<br />

yield than the local variety and also recorded maximum RWUE, net returns, and B:C ratio. In<br />

an early-season drought situation, interventions like thinning, weeding, inter cultivation, and<br />

opening <strong>of</strong> conservation furrows were implemented in the various crops. There was an<br />

average yield increase <strong>of</strong> 16.20% in pigeonpea, 19.97% in green gram, 15.31% in chickpea,<br />

Climate resilient agriculture for risk mitigation<br />

257 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

28.48% in rabi sorghum and 12.86% in safflower due to inter cultivation during the 2021-22<br />

cropping season. As a mid-season correction to mitigate dry spells, the interventions like<br />

repeated inter cultivation, supplemental irrigation and foliar spray were implemented. Foliar<br />

application <strong>of</strong> KNO3 @ 0.5% observed higher yields with an increase <strong>of</strong> 20-26% in various<br />

crops than in no sprays. In a terminal drought situation, protective irrigation from a farm<br />

pond or other irrigation source saves crop life and stabilizes yield. The impact <strong>of</strong> RTCP on<br />

coping with aberrant weather situations was also studied in various AICRPDA centres<br />

(Srinivasa Rao et al., 2013).<br />

Effective drought preparedness and management is a planning and response process to<br />

predict drought and establish timely and appropriate responses to minimize the negative<br />

consequences <strong>of</strong> the drought. We demonstrated simple and easily implementable<br />

preparedness practices like in situ rainwater harvesting practices, climate resilient<br />

intercropping systems, integrated farming systems, energy management and other agronomic<br />

practices in NICRA village to cope with weather aberration and enhance yields. The villagelevel<br />

institutions like Village Climate Risk Management Committee (VCRMC) and the<br />

custom hiring center (CHC) established in NICRA village can contribute immensely to<br />

community participation in the successful implementation <strong>of</strong> NICRA activities.<br />

Conclusion<br />

Technology development in agriculture address weather aberrations, which will make<br />

agriculture more climate resilient. The different RTCPs and preparedness implemented under<br />

NICRA observed better crop yield and pr<strong>of</strong>itability under various weather aberrations.<br />

References<br />

Srinivasarao, Ch., Ravindra Chary, G., Mishra, P.K., Nagarjuna Kumar, R., Maruthi Sankar,<br />

G.R., Venkateswarlu, B., and Sikka, A.K., 2013. Real time contingency planning:<br />

Initial experiences from AICRPDA. All India Coordinated Research Project for<br />

Dryland Agriculture (AICRPDA), ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad, India. 63 p.<br />

T2a-08R-1222<br />

Performance <strong>of</strong> Pigeon pea based Intercropping Systems under Changing<br />

Climatic Conditions<br />

M. Sudhakar, G. Dhanalakshmi, K.V. Ramanaiah, E. Ravi Goud<br />

SHE &CS, Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Yagantipalli. Kurnool dist. A.P-518124<br />

Adverse weather conditions like delay onset <strong>of</strong> rains and prolonged dry spells during the crop<br />

period is very common in rainfed situation. Such situation results in economic losses to the<br />

farmers due to partial or total failure <strong>of</strong> the sole crops. Pigeon pea is being cultivated in an area<br />

258 | Page<br />

Climate resilient agriculture for risk mitigation


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

<strong>of</strong> 45,000 ha and yields are limited by the amount and distribution <strong>of</strong> rainfall during monsoon<br />

period. Pigeon pea is a late maturing, tall growing, wide spaced crop with deep root system can<br />

accommodate rapidly growing, short duration and short statured crops like millets and pulses.<br />

To develop climate resilient alternative crop management systems and to reduce the impact <strong>of</strong><br />

crop failure due to drought. During the years 2016-2018 eighteen pigeon pea based<br />

intercropping systems were assessed under rainfed situation ie pigeon pea + greengram (1:5),<br />

pigeon pea + blackgram(1:5),T3: pigeonpea + setaria(1:5 ) and T4: Pigeonpea Sole).<br />

The results indicated that, among the cropping systems, intercropping <strong>of</strong> pigeonpea +<br />

greengram (1:5) (1263 kg ha-1), pigeon pea + setaria(1:5) 1244kg/ha and blackgram with<br />

pigeon pea (1198 kg ha-1) resulted in maximum pigeon pea equivalent yield over sole crop <strong>of</strong><br />

pigeon pea (986 kg /ha). The LER is high in pigeon pea + setaria intercropping system (1.67)<br />

as compared to other inter cropping systems. Among all intercropping Systems pigeon pea +<br />

setaria recorded highest net returns (26826 Rs/ha) followed by pigeon pea + greengram<br />

(24360Rs/ha) compared to pigeonpea + blackgram and sole pigeonpea. From the results it is<br />

evident that intercropping in rainfed areas stabilises the productivity and enhance the returns in<br />

terms <strong>of</strong> increased net returns and benefit cost ratio as well. Intercropping also act as insurance<br />

under the conditions <strong>of</strong> crop failures due to pest incidence, weeds and changing monsoon<br />

conditions.<br />

Climate resilient agriculture for risk mitigation<br />

T2a-09R-1224<br />

Does Rise in Atmospheric Temperature and Carbon Dioxide Adversely<br />

affect Maize Growth in Acid Soils <strong>of</strong> Northeast India?<br />

Ramesh Thangavel*, B.U. Choudhury, A. Balusamy, M. Prabha Devi, Joymati Chanu,<br />

M. Chakraborty, S. Hazarika and V.K. Mishra<br />

Division <strong>of</strong> System Research and Engineering, ICAR Research Complex for NEH Region, Umiam,<br />

Meghalaya-793103<br />

*rameshssac@yahoo.co.in<br />

Climate change was a myth or speculation in earlier times. However, now world has<br />

recognised that climate change is a fact. Today, the atmospheric concentration <strong>of</strong> CO 2 has<br />

risen to more than 400 ppm, warming the atmosphere by 0.84 o C (Vanaja et al., 2015). Global<br />

warming will have an impact on crop productivity. Plant development will be aided by<br />

increased photosynthesis and fertilisation effects brought on by elevated atmospheric CO 2<br />

(Kim et al., 2007). Increased temperature will result in physiological problems and heat<br />

injury, which will lower yield (IPCC, 2014). Depending on the regions, increased warmth<br />

brought on by increased CO 2 will have a significant impact on the production <strong>of</strong> food grains.<br />

Food grain production is expected to decline by up to 30% in tropical and subtropical nations<br />

like India as temperatures rise by 1.0 to 2.0 o C (IPCC, 2014). Therefore, adaptation strategies<br />

to sustain the crop productivity in the region is in urgent need. However, limited state <strong>of</strong> the<br />

259 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

art facilities for climatic research is one <strong>of</strong> the major constraints to predict whether rise in<br />

temperature along with CO2 have positive or negative effect on crop yield <strong>of</strong> the region. This<br />

study involves one <strong>of</strong> the foremost state-<strong>of</strong>-the-art facilities like Free Air Temperature<br />

Enrichment (FATE) to test the positive or negative impact <strong>of</strong> elevated temperature and CO2<br />

on the second most important crop <strong>of</strong> the region i.e. maize after the rice. Similarly, what are<br />

the possible adaptation strategies, if crop performance is affected, to compensate the crop<br />

yield loss due to climate change. Therefore, we conducted this study under the state-<strong>of</strong>-the-art<br />

facility (FATE) under open field condition with an anticipation like other parts, the crop<br />

productivity may be adversely affected.<br />

Methodology<br />

An experiment using FATE chambers was conducted at the NICRA Research farm <strong>of</strong> ICAR<br />

Research Complex for NEH Region, Umiam, Meghalaya. The mean annual rainfall is about<br />

2208 mm with minimum temperature <strong>of</strong> 6.8 o C and maximum <strong>of</strong> 29.7 o C. The main<br />

treatments are (i) ambient CO 2 (ACO 2) and ambient temperature (AT) (ii) Ambient CO 2 +<br />

elevated temperature (ET) and (iii) Elevated CO2 (ECO2) +ET. The three adaptation<br />

strategies namely a) 100% organic (FYM) (T2), b) 100% inorganic fertilizers (T3) and c)<br />

integrated nutrient management practices (INM) (T4) were compared with the absolute<br />

control (T1). FYM was applied at the rate equivalent to nitrogen content in FYM and P was<br />

supplemented through rock phosphate in T2 and T4, accordingly. We selected maize (RCM<br />

1-61) as the test crop and conducted the experiment for two consecutive years (2021-22)<br />

during kharif season. The initial properties <strong>of</strong> the soil samples were analysed using the<br />

standard procedures. At the end <strong>of</strong> the harvest, plant parameters including yield were<br />

recorded as per the standard procedures. Harvest Index (HI) was calculated using the formula<br />

outlined by Kemanian et al. (2007).<br />

Results<br />

The plant height was significantly influenced by the ECO2 and ET. The plant height ranged<br />

from 290.5 cm (T 1) to 309.7 cm (T 3) in ACO 2+AT; 245.5 cm (T 1) to 257.2 cm (T 3) in<br />

ACO 2+ET and 275.8 cm (T 1) to 311.9 (T 3) under both ECO2+ET treatments. ET decreased<br />

the plant height by 19.3% over ACO2+AT however, addition <strong>of</strong> ECO2 along with ET<br />

nullified the negative impact <strong>of</strong> ET on plant height which is at par with ACO 2+AT (296.6<br />

cm). Irrespective <strong>of</strong> the nutrient management treatments, the biomass yield ranged from 8.37<br />

(T1) to 9.49 (T4) t ha -1 in ACO2+AT; 6.63 (T1) to 8.06 (T2) t ha -1 under ACO2+ET and 8.18<br />

(T 1) to 9.55 (T 4) t ha -1 under both ECO 2+ET treatments (Fig. 1a). Similarly, the maize grain<br />

yield ranged from 3.97 (T1) to 4.58 (T4) t ha -1 in ACO2+AT; 2.67 (T1) to 3.23 (T4) t ha -1<br />

under ACO 2+ET and 2.93 to 4.06 (T3) t ha -1 under both ECO 2+ET treatments (Fig. 1b).<br />

Overall, the biomass and maize grain yield were in the range between 6.63 to 9.55 t ha -1 and<br />

2.67 to 4.58 t ha -1 , respectively. ET caused 44% reduction in grain yield over ACO2+AT<br />

260 | Page<br />

Climate resilient agriculture for risk mitigation


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

(4.39 t ha -1 ) however, inclusion <strong>of</strong> ECO2 with ET showed only 26.6% reduction in the grain<br />

yield over ACO2+AT. On the other hand, 18% reduction in biomass yield was observed<br />

under ET alone. With the addition <strong>of</strong> ECO 2 with ET, 22% increase in biomass yield was<br />

recorded over ET alone i.e. about 4% higher over ACO2+AT. The harvest index (HI) ranged<br />

from 35.8 to 52.9%. Both ET alone and ECO 2+ET showed 20 and 32%, respectively<br />

reduction in HI over ACO 2+AT treatment. With respect to nutrient management practices, i.e.<br />

adaptation strategies, INM (T4) recorded the maximum grain yield (4.58 t ha -1 ), biomass yield<br />

(9.55 t ha -1 ) while 100% organic fertilizers (T 2) recorded the highest HI (52.9%) regardless <strong>of</strong><br />

the ECO 2 and ET treatments. On an average, the adaptation strategy, INM, increased the<br />

biomass yield by about 17%, 4.5% and 10% compared to absolute control (T1), 100% organic<br />

(T 2) and 100% inorganic fertilizers (T 3), respectively. On the other hand, 100% inorganic<br />

fertilizers (T3) showed 4.5%, 7.5% and 23% increase in grain yield over T4, T2 and T1,<br />

respectively. Adaption INM and 100% organic nutrient management practices recovered the<br />

grain yield from 8 to 12% and biomass yield from 16 to 19% higher over the yield loss<br />

caused by elevated temperature.<br />

Effect <strong>of</strong> elevated CO2 and temperature on maize biomass yield (a) and grain yield (b) in acid soils <strong>of</strong><br />

Meghalaya<br />

Conclusion<br />

The study showed that maize responded positively to elevated CO2 with respect to plant<br />

growth parameters. On the other hand, elevated temperature decreased the biomass and grain<br />

yield components <strong>of</strong> maize. ET alone decreased the HI significantly however; addition <strong>of</strong><br />

CO2 with ET further decreased the HI significantly. The integrated nutrient management and<br />

FYM application could be better adaptation strategies for significant recovery <strong>of</strong> the yield<br />

loss caused by the elevated temperature. Further, these adaptation strategies could also<br />

improve the soil fertility under the changing climatic scenario.<br />

Climate resilient agriculture for risk mitigation<br />

261 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

References<br />

IPCC. 2014. Climate change 2014: impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Contribution <strong>of</strong> Working<br />

Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report <strong>of</strong> the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.<br />

Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA p. 1150.<br />

Kemanian, A.R., Stöckle, C.O., Huggins, D.R. and Viega, L.M. 2007. A simple method to estimate<br />

harvest index in grain crops. Field Crops Res. 103(3): 208-16.<br />

Kim SH, Gitz DC, Sicher RC, Baker JT and Timlin DJ. 2007. Temperature dependence <strong>of</strong> growth<br />

development, and photosynthesis in maize under elevated CO 2. Env. Exp. Bot. 61: 224–236.<br />

Vanaja M, Maheswari M, Jyothi Lakshmi N. et al. 2015. Variability in growth and yield response <strong>of</strong><br />

maize genotypes at elevated CO 2 concentration. Adv. Pl. Agric. Res. 2: 42.<br />

T2a-10R-1247<br />

Environment-Friendly Utilization <strong>of</strong> Basic Slag and Methanotroph to<br />

Mitigate Methane Emission in Lowland Rice<br />

S. Swain 1,2 *, P. Bhattacharyya 1 , P. Parida 2 , S. R. Padhy 1 , S. P. Parida 1 , S. K. Nayak 1<br />

and A. Das 1<br />

1 Crop Production Division, ICAR-National Rice Research Institute, Cuttack, Odisha-753006, India.<br />

2 Maharaja Sriram Chandra Bhanja Deo University, Baripada, Odisha-757001, India.<br />

* saubhagyalaxmi36@gmail.com<br />

Basic slag is an alkaline waste product produced during the smelting <strong>of</strong> metal ore in the<br />

production <strong>of</strong> iron and steel and has a high concentration <strong>of</strong> electron acceptors like free<br />

oxides. Global steel production was169.2 million tons in March 2021 (World Steel<br />

Association, 2021). India was in second largest steel producer (10 million tons) after China<br />

(94.00 million tons) during 2021. So, the vast amounts <strong>of</strong> slags including basic slags have<br />

been also generated that need to be utilized properly (Singh and Rekha, 2020). Reducing,<br />

recycling, and reusing <strong>of</strong> waste is necessary for economic and environmental sustainability<br />

(Singh et al., 2013). Basic slag contains a variety <strong>of</strong> useful components; viz. calcium oxide<br />

(CaO), magnesium oxide (MgO), silicon dioxide (SiO 2 ), alumina (Al 2 O 3 ), ferrous oxide<br />

(FeO), iron oxide (Fe 2 O 3), manganese dioxide (MnO 2 ), free calcium oxide (f-CaO), and<br />

free magnesium oxide (f-MgO) (Liu et al., 2019). It can be used as mineral fertilizer (Pang<br />

and Yang, 2020) including phosphate and silicon fertilizer. Apart from that it could also be<br />

used as soil a 0mendment for reducing GHGs emission from agricultural soils (Singla et al.,<br />

2015; Gwon et al., 2018; Wang et al., 2018a; Das et al., 2019). The rate <strong>of</strong> application <strong>of</strong><br />

basic slag in soils is also important for regulating methane emission. Iron-free oxides present<br />

in slag play a major role in the mitigation <strong>of</strong> CH4 emissions from paddy soil (Wang et al.,<br />

2015).<br />

262 | Page<br />

Climate resilient agriculture for risk mitigation


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Further, in paddy fields, soil microbial activities are the main factors controlling the<br />

production and uptake <strong>of</strong> CH4 (Conrad 1996). Methanotrophs are aerobic to microaerophilic<br />

bacteria, that metabolize and convert methane into carbon-di-oxide by oxidizing<br />

up to 90% <strong>of</strong> the CH4 (Krause et al., 2010; Ma et al., 2013). The root treatment <strong>of</strong><br />

methanotrophs is an effective option to mitigate the CH 4 emission (Dash et al., 2019). The<br />

addition <strong>of</strong> basic slag and methanotrophs to the rice soil could reduce the CH 4 emissions by<br />

affecting the physico-chemical and biological properties <strong>of</strong> the soil. So, in this study we<br />

have evaluated the individual as well as combined effect <strong>of</strong> the basic slag and methanotrophs<br />

on the methane emission in lowland rice to mitigate the GHGs emissions in rice by<br />

application <strong>of</strong> basic slag and methanotroph formulation.<br />

Methodology<br />

We have conducted the field trial at the experimental farm <strong>of</strong> ICAR-NRRI, Cuttack, Odisha.<br />

There were 8 treatments and 3 replications, and the experimental design was randomized<br />

block designing (RBD). The gas and soil samples were collected on critical growth stage<br />

(Panicle initiation) <strong>of</strong> rice with three replications for the estimation <strong>of</strong> GHGs emissions and<br />

soil parameters. The GHGs (CH 4, N 2O, and CO 2) fluxes from the rice ecosystems were<br />

estimated continuously at 5-7 days intervals by collecting the gas samples by using the<br />

‘manual close chamber method’ (Bhattacharyya et al., 2013, 2016). The GHGs concentrations<br />

were analyzed by using gas chromatography (Model no: Trace 1110 Gas Chromatograph; M/s<br />

Thermo). Enzymatic activities and carbon pools were estimated in the laboratory by using<br />

standard methods (Nayak et al., 2016).<br />

Treatment details: (i) RDF- recommended dose <strong>of</strong> fertilizer (RDF), 80:40:40:: N: P 2O 5:K 2O<br />

kg ha −1 ; (ii) BS- basic slag (1 t ha -1 ); (iii) BS+MTH (R)- basic slag + methanotroph (root dipbroth));<br />

(iv) BS+MTH (F)- basic slag + methanotroph (formulation as top dressed: acaciabased<br />

at 7 days after transplanting (DAT); (v) BS+MTH (R&F)- basic slag + methanotroph<br />

(root dip-broth + formulation as top dressed, at 28 DAT; (vi) MTH (R)- methanotroph (root<br />

dip-broth); (vii) MTH (F)- methanotroph (formulation as top dressed, at 7 DAT); (viii) MTH<br />

(R&F)- methanotroph (root dip-broth + formulation as top dressed, at 28 DAT).<br />

Results<br />

The soil carbon pools (microbial biomass carbon, readily mineralizable carbon and KMNO 4-<br />

C) and enzymatic activities (Dehydrogenase and fluorescein di-acetate) were highest in BS +<br />

MTH (R&F) treatments at the panicle initiation (PI) stage in lowland rice ecology. The CH4<br />

emission was lower in slag + methanotroph amendments than other treatments. In rice<br />

system, the CH4 fluxes were gradually increased after transplanting and reached at the peak at<br />

PI stage, after that gradually decreased towards harvesting period (Figure 1a). The methane<br />

emission for the treatment BS+MTH (R&F) was lower in relative to the RDF. The seasonal<br />

Climate resilient agriculture for risk mitigation<br />

263 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

CH4 emission was higher in RDF (85.11 kg ha -1 ) and lowest under BS + MTH (R&F) (72.23<br />

kg ha -1 ). The CH4 reduction percentage in BS + MTH (R&F) and MTH (R&F) over RDF,<br />

were 15.1 and 14.8%, respectively (Figure 1b).<br />

a<br />

CH 4 flux (mg m 2 h -1 )<br />

8<br />

6<br />

4<br />

2<br />

0<br />

RDF BS BS+MTH(R)<br />

Days after transplanting<br />

[RDF- recommended dose <strong>of</strong> fertilizer; BS-basic slag; MTH(R)- methanotroph root dip; MTH(F)-<br />

(methanotroph formulation).]<br />

(a) Methane and (b) reduction percentage <strong>of</strong> methane per in rice at different growth stages <strong>of</strong> rice under<br />

different treatments in kharif season.<br />

Conclusion<br />

Our findings indicated that soil amendment with basic slag and methanotrophs enrichment in<br />

rhizosphere could be a sustainable option for mitigating methane emission from lowland rice.<br />

References<br />

Conrad, R., 1996. Soil microorganisms as controllers <strong>of</strong> atmospheric trace gases (H2, CO, CH4,<br />

OCS, N 2O, and NO). Microbio. reviews, 60(4), pp.609-640.<br />

264 | Page<br />

Climate resilient agriculture for risk mitigation


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Gwon, H.S., Khan, M.I., Alam, M.A., Das, S. and Kim, P.J., 2018. Environmental risk<br />

assessment <strong>of</strong> steel-making slags and the potential use <strong>of</strong> LD slag in mitigating methane<br />

emissions and the grain arsenic level in rice (Oryza sativa L.). J. Hazardo. Mat. 353:236-<br />

243.<br />

Jackel, U., Thummes, K. and Kämpfer, P., 2005. Thermophilic methane production and<br />

oxidation in compost. FEMS Microbio. Eco. 52(2), pp.175-184.<br />

Krause, T., Andersson, G., Fröhlich, K. and Vaccaro, A., 2010. Multiple-energy carriers:<br />

modeling <strong>of</strong> production, delivery, and consumption. Proceedings <strong>of</strong> the IEEE, 99(1),<br />

pp.15-27.<br />

Wang, W., Lai, D.Y.F., Abid, A.A., Neogi, S., Xu, X. and Wang, C., 2018. Effects <strong>of</strong> steel slag<br />

and biochar incorporation on active soil organic carbon pools in a subtropical paddy<br />

field. Agron. 8(8), p.135.<br />

T2a-11R-1300<br />

Sustainable Intensification <strong>of</strong> Rainfed Lands through Food-Fodder based<br />

Systems for Climatic Resilience and Fodder Security in Semi-Arid Regions<br />

<strong>of</strong> India<br />

Sunil Kumar<br />

ICAR-Indian Grassland and Fodder Research Institute, Jhansi-284003(UP), INDIA<br />

Globally in rainfed lands, livestock is considered important part <strong>of</strong> agriculture diversification,<br />

income enhancement, and crucial for nutrition enhancement. However, the productivity <strong>of</strong> the<br />

animals is low due to improper nutrition, health care and management in almost all the<br />

developing nations. The availability <strong>of</strong> quality feed and fodder is one <strong>of</strong> the main reasons for<br />

poor performance <strong>of</strong> livestock. The present availability <strong>of</strong> feeds in India is estimated to be<br />

only 40% <strong>of</strong> the total requirement <strong>of</strong> these animals. As per IGFRI Vision 2050 document, in<br />

India, at the current level <strong>of</strong> growth in forage resources, there will be 18.4 % deficit in green<br />

fodder and 13.2% deficit in dry fodder in the year 2050. However, in the current decade, food<br />

security is being pursued at policy and intervention level through appropriate mechanism.<br />

But, feed and fodder security to huge livestock still is questionable in wake <strong>of</strong> changing<br />

climate. IPCC 2022 has highlighted the climate change impacts, risks and vulnerabilities, and<br />

adaptation options. In the present scenario, the sustainable intensification is the approaches to<br />

be pursued through mixed farming in the form <strong>of</strong> the crop-livestock, crop-forestry, crophorticulture<br />

fish-pig, fish-duck, and paddy-fish etc. In developing countries, mixed farming<br />

system is helpful in decreasing the cost <strong>of</strong> production per unit area, increasing income and<br />

productivity and reduce the risk <strong>of</strong> farmers. The research conducted at ICAR-IGFRI, Jhansi,<br />

India has highlighted that in arable lands opportunities lies for adoption <strong>of</strong> food-fodder based<br />

Climate resilient agriculture for risk mitigation<br />

265 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

systems with soil & water conservation practices, livestock-based IFS models, watershed<br />

management, non-conventional fodders and contingent crop planning in vulnerable rainfed<br />

areas. Balanced approach with selection and integration <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>itable and sustainable<br />

practices (food, fodder, fibre, fuel, fruit crops, livestock, fisheries, other subsidiary<br />

enterprises) with scientific NRM practices has been demonstrated and proved to enhance the<br />

productivity and income as well as reduce risk <strong>of</strong> climate variability (Dwivedi et al, 2018,<br />

Palsaniya et al, 2021 and Kumar et al, 2022).Therefore, it is the utmost need that the different<br />

components (Crop: monocrop, mixed/intercrop, multi-tier crops <strong>of</strong> cereals, legumes (pulses),<br />

oilseeds, forage etc; Livestock: milch cow, goat, sheep, poultry, bees; Tree: timber, fuel,<br />

fodder and fruit trees) <strong>of</strong> livelihood along with soil & water conservation measures to be<br />

chosen selectively.<br />

References<br />

Dwivedi, R.N., Tripathi, S.N., Tripathi, S.B., Singh, K.A., Agarwal, R.K., Sahay, C.S.,<br />

Pandey, Sadhna, Dwivedi, P.N., Sunil Kumar, Singh,J.P., Kushwaha, B.P., Sunil<br />

266 | Page<br />

Kumar, Palsaniya D.R., Satyapriya, Narsimhlu, B. and Kumar, Anil, 2018. Enhancing<br />

productivity and livelihood <strong>of</strong> Bundelkhand farmers through crop-livestock based<br />

interventions. Curr. Adv. Agric. Sci. 18 (2): 84-88.<br />

Palsaniya, D.R., Sunil Kumar, Manoj Chaudhary, Khem Chand, Rai, S. K., Akram Ahmed,<br />

Sahay, C.S. and Mukesh Choudhary. 2021. Integrated multi-enterprise agricultural<br />

system for sustaining livelihood, energy use and resource recycling: a case study from<br />

semi-arid tropics <strong>of</strong> central India. Agr<strong>of</strong>or. Sys. 95, 1619–1634.<br />

Kumar Sunil, Purushottam Sharma, Satyapriya, Prabhu Govindasamy, Maharaj Singh, Sant<br />

Kumar, Hanamant, M. Halli and Bishwa Bhaskar Choudhary, 2022. Economic<br />

impression <strong>of</strong> on-farm research for sustainable crop production, milk yield, and<br />

livelihood option in semi-arid region <strong>of</strong> central India, Agron. J.<br />

DOI: 10.1002/agj2.21062.<br />

T2a-12R-1319<br />

Characterizing Different Indian Farming Systems to Assess their Resilience<br />

to Climate Change<br />

Upasna Sharma and Abhilasha Singh*<br />

Indian Institute <strong>of</strong> Technology, Delhi, 110016, India<br />

* Abhilasha.Singh@sopp.iitd.ac.in<br />

It is well established that the most unforgiving wrath <strong>of</strong> anthropogenic climate change is<br />

projected to fall on the agricultural sector due it its direct dependence on ecosystem services.<br />

The Fifth Assessment Report <strong>of</strong> the IPCC has stated with robust evidence that the impact <strong>of</strong><br />

Climate resilient agriculture for risk mitigation


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

climate change on crop production and different aspects <strong>of</strong> food security- access, utilization,<br />

and price stability, is going to be severe (IPCC 2017). Food systems across the world already<br />

experience multiple disruptions from extreme weather events, pest and pathogen attacks,<br />

water scarcity, economic shocks, and depleting natural resources (FAO, 2021). The added<br />

threat <strong>of</strong> climate change will exacerbate these disruptions and the magnitude <strong>of</strong> its impact<br />

would be determined by context-specific vulnerabilities and the resilience <strong>of</strong> agri-food<br />

systems. In a predominantly agrarian country with around 70% <strong>of</strong> the population almost<br />

completely dependent on agriculture for its livelihood, climate change acts as a threat<br />

multiplier for the Indian agrarian sector which is already reeling from multiple crises.<br />

Increased incidence <strong>of</strong> indebtedness, stagnating farm incomes, extreme poverty, growing<br />

distress migration, and rising farmer suicides are just some <strong>of</strong> the indicators <strong>of</strong> ongoing rural<br />

distress.<br />

Considering the complexity <strong>of</strong> challenges faced by agrarian economies like India, a multidisciplinary,<br />

holistic approach is required to make the agricultural ecosystems resilient. The<br />

pressing threat <strong>of</strong> climate change on the already ailing sector cannot be addressed in an<br />

isolated manner by a few technological fixes without considering the existing socio-economic<br />

context, and the local perspectives. Assessing the resilience <strong>of</strong> agroecosystems is a systemic<br />

approach to see if they can mobilize resources, identify opportunities, implement strategies,<br />

develop processes and transform in the face <strong>of</strong> a disturbance or unpredicted change (Cabell &<br />

Oel<strong>of</strong>se, 2012; Darnh<strong>of</strong>er, 2014). It is predicated on the understanding that each farming<br />

system has certain micro and macro level characteristics ranging from socio-economic<br />

circumstances, demography, cropping systems, and farming strategies to institutions,<br />

ecosystem health, market linkages, and its agro-climatic context. These characteristics<br />

determine the level <strong>of</strong> resilience <strong>of</strong> a farming system to sudden shocks and long-term stresses.<br />

This approach can provide invaluable insights for adaptive management and governance in<br />

heterogeneous agricultural landscapes.<br />

Methodology<br />

While there is no dearth <strong>of</strong> research available on the sector’s vulnerability to climate change,<br />

there exists a knowledge gap when it comes to studying the different farming practices and<br />

comparing their relative adaptive capacities and vulnerabilities to climate change. The paper<br />

seeks to address this gap by exploring the diversity <strong>of</strong> Indian agroecosystems to better<br />

understand the process <strong>of</strong> developing climate resilience. Based on an extensive review <strong>of</strong> the<br />

literature, the paper identifies two things – first, the different farming systems existing in<br />

India; and second, the characteristics/indicators <strong>of</strong> an agricultural system that make it resilient<br />

to climate shocks and other stressors. These characteristics will then be used in a later study<br />

for a comparative analysis <strong>of</strong> different farming systems in India concerning their climate<br />

resilience.<br />

Climate resilient agriculture for risk mitigation<br />

267 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Results<br />

Different farming systems in different agro-climatic zones have different capacities to absorb<br />

climate shocks. In India, farmers have adopted a diverse range <strong>of</strong> farming practices suited to<br />

their specific climatic and cultural contexts. On the one hand, we have traditional smallholder<br />

subsistence farming systems like dryland agriculture, terrace farming, and shifting<br />

cultivation, on the other hand, irrigated farming systems that are input-intensive and chemical<br />

based have become prevalent as modern industrial agriculture ever since the Green<br />

Revolution. Sustainable agriculture forms the third category <strong>of</strong> farming systems in India that<br />

seeks to promote the use <strong>of</strong> traditional farming knowledge and agronomic practices alongside<br />

modern technological innovations in a manner that improves crop yields while also reducing<br />

the ecological footprint <strong>of</strong> agriculture. Such systems range from organic farming, precision<br />

agriculture, and conservation agriculture to more alternative farming systems based on<br />

agroecological principles. In fact, recently, many smallholder farming communities in states<br />

like Telangana and Karnataka are now switching to more sustainable, agroecology-based<br />

farming practices by employing their traditional, indigenous knowledge.<br />

Building resilience to climate change requires an in-depth understanding <strong>of</strong> the vulnerability,<br />

adaptive capacity as well as ability <strong>of</strong> each farming system to bounce back after a climate<br />

shock. These three attributes may vary across systems depending on characteristics such as<br />

farmers’ perceptions and experiences, their knowledge about climate change threats, and the<br />

available institutional mechanisms that facilitate access to credit, production <strong>of</strong> knowledge,<br />

and market access. An exploration <strong>of</strong> these attributes will help us to develop a framework to<br />

assess and compare the resilience capacities <strong>of</strong> different farming systems in a subsequent<br />

study.<br />

References<br />

Cabell, J. F., and Oel<strong>of</strong>se, M. 2012. An Indicator Framework for Assessing Agroecosystem<br />

Resilience. Eco. Soc. 17(1). https://www.jstor.org/stable/26269017<br />

Darnh<strong>of</strong>er, I. 2014. Resilience and why it matters for farm management. European Review <strong>of</strong><br />

Agric. Econ. 41(3), 461–484. https://doi.org/10.1093/erae/jbu012<br />

FAO. 2021. The State <strong>of</strong> Food and Agriculture 2021: Making agrifood systems more resilient<br />

to shocks and stresses. FAO. https://doi.org/10.4060/cb4476en<br />

IPCC, 2014: Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Part A: Global<br />

and Sectoral Aspects. Contribution <strong>of</strong> Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press,<br />

Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, 1132 pp.<br />

268 | Page<br />

Climate resilient agriculture for risk mitigation


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

T2a-13R-1587<br />

Impact <strong>of</strong> Climate Resilient Interventions in NICRA Village Rupana <strong>of</strong><br />

Sirsa District in Haryana<br />

D.S. Jakhar, Vinita Rajput and Sunil Kumar<br />

Krishi Vigyan Kendra Sirsa, Haryana- 125055<br />

Climate change has affected crop yield, livestock production and soil health, adversely. The<br />

rainfed agro-ecological areas <strong>of</strong> Haryana are experiencing weather extremes such as heat<br />

wave, depleting groundwater levels, salinity, and erratic rainfall. To address these climate<br />

constraints and with an aim to develop climate resilient sustainable ecosystem, NICRA<br />

project was launched in 2011. For NICRA project, a village Rupana in block Nathusari<br />

Chopta was adopted by Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Sirsa as the village addressed few climatic<br />

vulnerabilities. The village has a total cultivable area <strong>of</strong> about 780 ha out <strong>of</strong> which 70 ha area<br />

is rainfed, 60 ha area is salt affected. The main cropping patterns <strong>of</strong> the village are Cottonwheat,<br />

Paddy- wheat and Guar –Mustard. The soil specific and crop specific vulnerabilities<br />

were identified and based on these constraints, suitable interventions were demonstrated to<br />

the farmers.<br />

Methodology<br />

In the present study impact <strong>of</strong> two successful interventions has been described. To address<br />

the issue <strong>of</strong> water conservation, use <strong>of</strong> Laser leveler was demonstrated to the farmers. To<br />

address another climatic constraint <strong>of</strong> para wilt in cotton, occurring due to adverse weather<br />

conditions in the month <strong>of</strong> September, use <strong>of</strong> Cobalt Chloride @ 10 ppm was demonstrated.<br />

The demonstrated were conducted in the fields <strong>of</strong> selected farmers and fields were visited by<br />

the scientists from time to time. The data <strong>of</strong> yield were collected at the harvesting stage and<br />

BC ratio was calculated after discussion with farmer.<br />

Results<br />

Both the interventions were highly successful in the existing agro-climatic conditions <strong>of</strong> the<br />

village and effectively minimized the effect <strong>of</strong> climate stress. The use <strong>of</strong> laser leveler has<br />

resulted in increase in benefit cost (BC) ratio to the tune <strong>of</strong> 3.19 in demonstration fields with<br />

the 8.8 percent increase in crop yield, whereas, the respective value <strong>of</strong> BC ratio in farmer<br />

practice was 3.13. Use <strong>of</strong> laser leveler reduced the pumping hours per irrigation, and hence<br />

saved significant amount <strong>of</strong> irrigation water in paddy cultivation. The saving <strong>of</strong> water by the<br />

use <strong>of</strong> laser leveler has also been reported by Jat et al. (2015) and Naresh et al. (2014).<br />

Similarly, use <strong>of</strong> cobalt chloride 0.01 percent immediately after appearance <strong>of</strong> symptoms in<br />

cotton has effectively managed the problem <strong>of</strong> parawilt. A 20.3 percent increase in yield was<br />

Climate resilient agriculture for risk mitigation<br />

269 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

recorded from the demonstration plot as compared to farmer practice. The BC ratio in<br />

demonstration plot (1.1) was higher as compared to farmer practice (1.6).<br />

Effect <strong>of</strong> cobalt chloride foliar spray on yield and economics <strong>of</strong> Bt Cotton<br />

Intervention<br />

Area<br />

(ha)<br />

No.<br />

Farmers<br />

Crop yield<br />

(q/ha)<br />

Cost <strong>of</strong><br />

cultivation<br />

(Rs./ha)<br />

Gross<br />

return<br />

(Rs./ha)<br />

Net<br />

return<br />

(Rs./ha)<br />

Farmers practice 2 5 8 35900 40000 4100 1.1<br />

Demo 20 25 12 36200 60000 23800 1.6<br />

B:C<br />

ratio<br />

The results are in line the findings <strong>of</strong> Sarlach & Kaur (2013) and Singh et al. (2018) who<br />

observed reduced incidence <strong>of</strong> para wilt after application <strong>of</strong> 10 ppm cobalt chloride in cotton.<br />

Results are in line with Sarlach et.al (2008) who observed that foliar application <strong>of</strong> ethylene<br />

inhibitor (Cobalt chloride 10 μg mL -1 during 36-48 hrs.) after irrigation helped in complete<br />

recovery from parawilt within 5-7 days <strong>of</strong> spray. However, there was no recovery when<br />

permanent wilting has already set in.<br />

Conclusion<br />

Owing to better results in the demonstration <strong>of</strong> climate resilient interventions, their adoption<br />

percent increased among the farmers with time and presently hundreds <strong>of</strong> farmers in NICRA<br />

village and nearby villages having similar agro-ecological conditions are practicing these<br />

interventions.<br />

References<br />

Sarlach, R. S. and Kaur, G. 2013. Control <strong>of</strong> parawilt in different Bt cotton hybrids in Punjab,<br />

India. Eco. Env. & Cons., 19 : 521-23.<br />

Singh, G., Singh, P., Singh, K., Sodhi, G. P. S. and Sekhon, B. S. 2021. Economic Analysis<br />

<strong>of</strong> Parawilt Management in Bt-Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) in Mansa District <strong>of</strong><br />

South-western Punjab, India. Ind. J. Ext. Edu. 58(1), 93–96.<br />

Gill, G. 2014. An assessment <strong>of</strong> the impact <strong>of</strong> laser-assisted precision land levelling<br />

technology as a component <strong>of</strong> climate-smart agriculture in the state <strong>of</strong> Haryana,<br />

India. New Delhi, India: CIMMYT-CCAFS, International Maize and Wheat<br />

Improvement Center (CIMMYT).<br />

Jat, M., Singh, Y., Gill, G., Sidhu, H., Aryal, J. P., Stirling, C. and Gerard, B. 2015. Laser<br />

assisted precision land leveling: Impacts in irrigated intensive production systems <strong>of</strong><br />

South Asia. In Advances in soil science, Ed. R. Lal, and B. A. Stewart, 323–52.<br />

Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group.<br />

270 | Page<br />

Climate resilient agriculture for risk mitigation


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Naresh, R., Singh, S., Misra, A., Tomar, S., Kumar, P., Kumar, V. and Kumar, S. 2014.<br />

Evaluation <strong>of</strong> the laser leveled land leveling technology on crop yield and water use<br />

productivity in Western Uttar Pradesh. Afr J Agric Res. 9 (4):473–78.<br />

doi:10.5897/AJAR12.1741.<br />

Sarlach, R.S., Sekhon, P.S., Sohu, R., and Gill, M.S. 2008. Parawilt in Bt cotton and its<br />

amelioration. Eco. Env. & Cons., 14 (2): 323-26.<br />

T2a-14P-1049<br />

On-farm Assessment <strong>of</strong> Climate Resilient Interventions for Sustaining<br />

Crop Productivity in Rainfed Eco-System<br />

M.S.Pendke*, W. N. Narkhede, B.V. Asewar, P.H. Gourkhede and D.P. Waskar<br />

AICRP on Dryland Agriculture, Vasantrao Naik Marathwada Krishi Vidyapeeth, Parbhani 431 402<br />

*pendkemadan@gmail.com<br />

Marathwada region <strong>of</strong> Maharashtra state majorly comes under assured rainfall zone. The<br />

climate <strong>of</strong> Marathwada experiences wide inter districts and intra districts variability. The<br />

mean annual rainfall <strong>of</strong> the zone is 880 mm. The occurrence <strong>of</strong> frequent droughts and<br />

unseasonal rains are the features <strong>of</strong> climate change in the region.The way to stabilize and<br />

enhance productivity in dryland agriculture lies with strategies which consists <strong>of</strong> the adoption<br />

<strong>of</strong> intercropping, rainwater harvesting & supplementary irrigation systems, foliar<br />

applicationand the adoption <strong>of</strong> in-situ moisture conservation practices. The rainfed<br />

technologies developed by the AICRPDA Centre were evaluated on the farmer’s field.<br />

Methodology<br />

The methodology involves the experimentation based on developed climate resilient<br />

technologies and its evaluation and validation on farmer’s field with respect to rainfed<br />

agriculture in Marathwada region. The climate resilient technologies viz., broad bed and<br />

furrow techniques, conservation furrow, intercropping, stress management, and protective<br />

irrigation through farm ponds were evaluated.<br />

Results<br />

The pooled data (2017-20) on soybean and cotton productivity, monetary returns, B:C ratio<br />

and rain water use efficiency as influenced by different treatments is presented in Tables.<br />

Climate resilient agriculture for risk mitigation<br />

271 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Soybean crop yield, monetary returns, B:C ratio and rain water use efficiency as<br />

influenced by different treatments<br />

Treatments<br />

Soybean yield (kg<br />

ha -1 )<br />

GMR (Rs.)<br />

NMR<br />

(Rs.)<br />

B:C<br />

Ratio<br />

RWUE (kg<br />

ha -1 mm -1 )<br />

L 1 : Flat Bed 837 26799 6128.7 1.30 2.93<br />

L 2 : BBF 1022 32689 12144.0 1.59 3.58<br />

L 3 : Ridges & Furrow 930 29745 9075.3 1.44 3.26<br />

SE + 28.36 602.96 602.9 - -<br />

CD 84.73 1668.7 1668.7 - -<br />

Cotton seed yield, monetary returns, B:C ratio and rain water use efficiency as<br />

influenced by different treatments<br />

Treatments<br />

Seed cotton yield<br />

(kg ha -1 )<br />

GMR (Rs.)<br />

NMR<br />

(Rs.)<br />

B:C<br />

Ratio<br />

RWUE (kg<br />

ha -1 mm -1 )<br />

L1 :Flat Bed 732.0 32940 5911 1.18 2.56<br />

L 2 : BBF 916.1 41227 7746 1.23 3.21<br />

L 3 : Ridges & Furrow 853.1 38392 5911 1.18 2.99<br />

SE + 10.05 324.7 324.7 -- -<br />

CD at 5% 27.83 898.8 898.8 -- -<br />

The effect <strong>of</strong> land configurations on productivity was found significant. The productivity <strong>of</strong><br />

soybean and cotton was recorded by treatment sowing on BBF was found significantly higher<br />

than sowing on flatbed. The significantly higher GMR, NMR, BC ratio and RWUE were<br />

observed with treatment sowing on BBF which was found significantly higher than other<br />

treatments. Singh (2011) found that BBF technology is effective to overcome moisture stress<br />

and increase in soybean yield. The pooled data on seed cotton yield, monetary returns, B:C<br />

ratio and rain water use efficiency as influenced by various stress management practices is<br />

presented in Table.<br />

Cotton seed yield, monetary returns, B:C ratio and rain water use efficiency as<br />

Treatments<br />

influenced by different treatments (2016-20)<br />

Seed<br />

cotton<br />

yield (kg<br />

ha -1 )<br />

GMR<br />

(Rs.)<br />

NMR<br />

(Rs.)<br />

B:C<br />

Ratio<br />

RWUE<br />

(kg ha -1<br />

mm -1 )<br />

T 1: RDF 687.0 30915 1218 1.04 2.41<br />

T 2: RDF + Straw mulch (35 and 65 DAS) 869.0 39105 5998 1.18 3.04<br />

T 3: RDF + Foliar application <strong>of</strong> Antitransparent<br />

Kaolin (35 and 65 DAS)<br />

752.0 33840 318 1.00 2.63<br />

272 | Page<br />

Climate resilient agriculture for risk mitigation


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

T 4: RDF + Foliar application <strong>of</strong> KNO 3 (35<br />

and 65 DAS)<br />

T 5: RDF + Foliar application <strong>of</strong> NPK<br />

(19:19:19) (35 and 65 DAS)<br />

T 6: RDF + Foliar application <strong>of</strong> MOP (35<br />

and 65 DAS)<br />

T 7: RDF + Foliar application <strong>of</strong> Thiourea<br />

(@ 250 g ha -1 at 35 and 65 DAS)<br />

898.0 40410 7158 1.21 3.15<br />

853.0 38385 6258 1.19 2.99<br />

799.0 35955 4397 1.13 2.80<br />

740.0 33300 2188 1.07 2.59<br />

T 8: RDF + Water sprays (35 and 65 DAS) 718.0 32310 2062 1.06 2.51<br />

T 9: 75% RDF + 25% through FYM 659.0 29655 -1347 0.95 2.31<br />

T 10 :75% RDF + Foliar application<br />

<strong>of</strong> KNO 3 (35 and 65 DAS)<br />

825.0 37125 5738 1.18 2.89<br />

SE + 59.33 826.4 147.7 -- -<br />

CD at 5% 177.50 2451.9 438.2 -- -<br />

Mean 780.0 35100 3399 1.10 2.73<br />

The effect <strong>of</strong> various stress management practices on cotton seed yield was found significant.<br />

The treatment T 4 i.e. RDF +KNO 3 exhibited the highest seed cotton yield <strong>of</strong> 898.0 kg ha -1 which was<br />

significantly superior over control, T9 and T10 and found at par with the rest <strong>of</strong> all the treatments.<br />

Pooled data indicated that cotton + soybean intercropping system recorded significantly superior<br />

seed cotton equivalent yield (2120 kg ha -1 ) than other cropping systems. Soybean + Pigeonpea<br />

and Sorghum + Pigeonpea recorded at par seed cotton equivalent yield. Conservation furrow in<br />

pigeonpea crop increased the yield <strong>of</strong> pigeon pea by 26.57 per cent. Whereas in the case <strong>of</strong> the<br />

soybean crop the yield was increased by 25.77 per cent due to conservation furrow over no<br />

furrow opening. The treatment <strong>of</strong> two protective irrigations at branching and flowering stages<br />

recorded significantly higher safflower yield over control.<br />

Conclusion<br />

All the climate resilient interventions proved better in respect <strong>of</strong> increase in crop yield with<br />

increased monetary returns and proved agricultural sustainability in the region under rainfed<br />

farming<br />

References<br />

Singh, D.V., Vyas, A.K., Gupta, G.K., Ramteke, R and Khan, I.R. 2011. Tractor drawn broad bed<br />

furrow seed drill machine to overcome moisture stress for soybean in vertisols. Indian J. Agric.<br />

Sci., 81:941-944<br />

Climate resilient agriculture for risk mitigation<br />

273 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

T2a-15P-1069<br />

Evaluation <strong>of</strong> Mustard [Brassica juncea (L.) Czern and Coss] Varieties to<br />

Staggered Sowing in Changing Climatic Scenarios under Custard Apple<br />

based Agri-Horti System<br />

Rajnish Pandey, Sudhir Kumar Rajpoot, D.E. Nirmal, Miryala Sushma and A.K. Nema<br />

Banaras Hindu University Varanasi (UP)–221 005 India.<br />

The prospect <strong>of</strong> changing the global climate has piqued scientists' interest, as these changes<br />

are having a severe influence on global crop productivity and jeopardizing global food<br />

security. Due to its high sensitivity to environmental factors, the mustard yield may be<br />

significantly impacted by climate change (Boomiraj et al., 2021). Negative growth rates in<br />

mustard yield since 1997 may have been caused by unfavorable monsoon conditions, which<br />

led to water stress (drought and excessive rainfall) and temperature increase. Temperature<br />

cannot be easily altered in the field, but sowing time can be adjusted such that the various<br />

physiological phases <strong>of</strong> the crop coincide with specified (most suited) temperature during the<br />

crop growth cycle, which is the most important non-monetary input for increasing production<br />

(Deshmukh and Patel, 2013). Selecting appropriate cultivars can also help to mitigate the<br />

negative impacts <strong>of</strong> delayed sowing on productivity, as the extent <strong>of</strong> yield reduction varies<br />

with variety (Lal et al., 2017).<br />

Methodology<br />

A field experiment was conducted to evaluate the effect on mustard [Brassica juncea(L.)<br />

Czern and Coss] varieties to staggered sowing in changing climatic scenario under custard<br />

apple based agri-horti system at Agricultural Research Farm, Rajiv Gandhi South Campus,<br />

Banaras Hindu University, Barkachha, Mirzapur, Uttar Pradesh during the rabi season <strong>of</strong><br />

2021-22 in a split plot design with three replications. The main plot treatments were three<br />

planting dates (S1: 15 th October, S2:30 th October, and S3:15 th November), while the subplots<br />

were five distinct mustard varieties (Pitambari, RH-725, Giriraj, RH-749, and Kranti).<br />

Results<br />

Among the varieties, Giriraj outperformed other varieties in terms <strong>of</strong> growth, and yield<br />

parameters. Late sown (November) mustard crop exhibited more decline in yield, and yield<br />

characteristics than October sown crop, however among the varieties, Giriraj demonstrated<br />

more resistance to projected climate change than other varieties. The highest seed yield was<br />

recorded when the crop was sown on the 30 th <strong>of</strong> October ((1536.89 kg ha -1 ), followed by the<br />

15 th <strong>of</strong> October (1372.78 kg ha -1 ), and the lowest yield was recorded when the crop was sown<br />

on 15 th <strong>of</strong> November (1178.47 kg ha -1 ). Variety Giriraj had the highest seed yield (1583.27 kg<br />

ha -1 ), followed by variety RH-725(1499.75 kg ha -1 ), RH-0749 (1382.58 kg ha -1 ) Kranti<br />

274 | Page<br />

Climate resilient agriculture for risk mitigation


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

(1258.90 kg ha -1 ) and variety Pitambari had the lowest seed yield (1089.08 kg ha -1 ). The oil<br />

yield varied greatly depending on the date <strong>of</strong> sowing. The crop planted on the 30 th <strong>of</strong> October<br />

recorded highest oil yield (609.66 kg ha -1 ), followed by the crop sown on the 15 th <strong>of</strong> October<br />

(527.98 kg ha -1 ). The crop sown on the 15 th <strong>of</strong> November produced the lowest oil yield<br />

(446.48 kg ha -1 ). The oil yield was greatly impacted by different varieties <strong>of</strong> Indian mustard.<br />

The variety Giriraj had the highest oil yield (593.89 kg ha -1 ), followed by RH-725 (578.94 kg<br />

ha -1 ), RH-0749 (558.63 kg ha -1 ), and Kranti (473.29 kg ha -1 ) while the variety Pitambari had<br />

the lowest (435.45 kg ha -1 ). However, S2 (30 th October) yielded the highest net return <strong>of</strong> Rs.<br />

168435.96, followed by S 1 (15 th October) yielding Rs. 157596.66, and S 3 (15 th November)<br />

yielding Rs. 144625.81 which is the least among all.<br />

Effect <strong>of</strong> sowing dates and varieties onseed yield (kg ha -1 ), oil yield (kg ha -1 ), total cost <strong>of</strong><br />

cultivation (Rs ha -1 ) and net return (Rs ha -1 ) under custard apple based agri-horti<br />

system.<br />

Treatment<br />

Sowing Dates<br />

Seed yield<br />

(kg ha -1 )<br />

Climate resilient agriculture for risk mitigation<br />

Oil Yield (kg<br />

ha -1 )<br />

Total cost <strong>of</strong><br />

cultivation (Rs ha -1 )<br />

Net return (Rs<br />

ha -1 )<br />

S1 (15 th October) 1372.78 527.98 59776.12 157596.66<br />

S2 (30 th October) 1536.89 609.66 59776.12 168435.96<br />

S3 (15 th November) 1178.47 446.48 59776.12 144625.81<br />

CD = (P = 0.05) 212.87 72.12 - 13956.00<br />

Varieties<br />

V1 (Pitambari) 1089.08 435.45 59783.32 136889.33<br />

V2 (RH-725) 1499.75 578.94 59783.32 166489.66<br />

V3 (Giriraj) 1583.27 593.89 59783.32 172033.52<br />

V4 (RH-0749) 1382.58 558.63 59783.32 158672.93<br />

V5 (Kranti) 1258.90 473.29 59783.32 150345.28<br />

CD (P = 0.05) 75.62 43.24 - 4853.28<br />

References<br />

Boomiraj, K., Chakrabarti, B., Aggarwal, P. K., Choudhary, R., and Chander, S. 2010.<br />

Assessing the vulnerability <strong>of</strong> Indian mustard to climate change. Agric. Ecosyst. and<br />

environ. 138 (3-4), 265-273.<br />

Deshmukh, S. P., and Patel, J. G. 2013. Influence <strong>of</strong> Non-monetary and Low-Cost Input in<br />

Sustainable Summer Pearlmillet (Penistum glaucumL.) Production. Int. J. <strong>of</strong> Agric<br />

Food Sci. Technol. 4 (6), 579-588.<br />

Lal, B., Gautam, P., Panda, B. B., Raja, R., Singh, T., Tripathi, R., and Nayak, A. K. 2017.<br />

Crop and varietal diversification <strong>of</strong> rainfed rice-based cropping systems for higher<br />

productivity and pr<strong>of</strong>itability in Eastern India. PLoS One 12 (4), e0175709.<br />

275 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

T2a-16P-1077<br />

Assessment <strong>of</strong> Different System <strong>of</strong> Rice Cultivation Technique for<br />

Combating Climatic Aberrations in Rainfed Medium Land Situation <strong>of</strong><br />

Purulia District <strong>of</strong> West Bengal, India during kharif season<br />

S.K. Bhattacharya, B. Maity A. Chakraborty, M.K. Bhattacharjya, S. Thakur,<br />

P. Biswas and J. Gorain<br />

Krishi Vigyan Kendra Kalyan, Purulia, 723147, West Bengal, India<br />

kvkkalyanpurulia@gmail.com<br />

Rice is the staple food for 65% population <strong>of</strong> India which is increasing at a rate <strong>of</strong> 1.6% per<br />

year. Considering climatic aberrations like delayed onset <strong>of</strong> monsoon, intermittent drought<br />

and abnormally high temperature results in, not only transplanting <strong>of</strong> over-aged seedlings<br />

with low productivity, but also a major portion <strong>of</strong> rainfed Rice area remain fallow that<br />

brought down the overall area under rice cultivation during kharif season. Hence, there is a<br />

need to increase the productivity <strong>of</strong> rice to feed the burgeoning population under changing<br />

climatic situation. Field experiments were conducted to assess the suitability <strong>of</strong> System <strong>of</strong><br />

Rice Intensification (SRI) and Direct seeding <strong>of</strong> pre-germinated paddy seeds using Paddy<br />

Drum Seeder with Farmers’ practices <strong>of</strong> transplanting rice variety MTU-7029 under rainfed<br />

medium land situation. The experiment was conducted in Jahajpur KVK instructional farm<br />

and Haramjanga (NICRA Village <strong>of</strong> KVK,), village <strong>of</strong> Purulia, West Bengal for the last three<br />

consecutive years. The results show SRI method and Direct seeding <strong>of</strong> pre-germinated paddy<br />

seeds using Paddy Drum Seeder. Both significantly out-yielded Farmer’s Practice <strong>of</strong><br />

transplanting by 58.59% and 8.19% respectively. Moreover, the cost <strong>of</strong> weed management<br />

using cono weeder in SRI field and Direct Seeding was also reduced by 433.33% and<br />

263.63% respectively when it is compared with Farmer’s Practice <strong>of</strong> rice cultivation. It has<br />

also been revealed that improved technologies like SRI and Direct seeding <strong>of</strong> pre-germinated<br />

paddy seeds resulted higher net income Rs. 28,300.00/ha with a B:C ratio <strong>of</strong> 1.87 and Rs.<br />

10,220.00 with a B:C ratio 1.52 respectively as compared to Farmer’s Practice <strong>of</strong> rice<br />

cultivation <strong>of</strong> Rs. 5560.00 with a B:C ratio 1.36. Hence it may be concluded from the study<br />

that, SRI method <strong>of</strong> rice transplanting was found to be superior in producing more rice with<br />

less quantity <strong>of</strong> inputs such as water, seed, fertilizers and labour in view <strong>of</strong> combating<br />

climatic aberrations and stabilises the productivity with higher return.<br />

276 | Page<br />

Climate resilient agriculture for risk mitigation


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

T2a-17P-1120<br />

Musk Melon Cultivation on Reservoir Basin: A Climate Smart and<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>itable Farmer Practice in Arid Zone <strong>of</strong> Rajasthan<br />

Chandan Kumar*, Dheeraj Singh, M. K. Chaudhary and Arvind Singh<br />

ICAR-CAZRI, Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Pali (Rajasthan) India<br />

* chandan.kumar@icar.gov.in<br />

The harsh climatic condition and poor quality <strong>of</strong> soil and water in arid region <strong>of</strong> Rajasthan<br />

make crop production very challenging. Only hardy crop species with very less water<br />

requirement is grown in these areas mainly in kharif or rabi season where assured irrigation<br />

is available. Mean annual rainfall in the region varies from about 500 mm along the slope <strong>of</strong><br />

the Aravallis in the east to 100 mm along the border with Pakistan in the west, more than<br />

85% <strong>of</strong> which is received during the period <strong>of</strong> South West monsoon (June-September). The<br />

mean annual potential evapo-transpiration exceeds precipitation by a wide margin (1400-<br />

2000 mm). Crop failure is a common feature either due to inadequacy <strong>of</strong> rainfall or due to<br />

shortage <strong>of</strong> soil moisture to meet the crop water requirements during different phenophases<br />

(Faroda et al. 2007). Besides this, the arid region has several biotic and abiotic limitations<br />

that are responsible for low productivity. Under these conditions local farmers utilized agro<br />

ecological knowledge to convert stress into opportunity with autonomous adaptation. One <strong>of</strong><br />

such example is the cultivation <strong>of</strong> vegetable and fruits in the reservoir basin during winter<br />

and summer season in the arid zone <strong>of</strong> Rajasthan. The small and landless farmers residing in<br />

the catchment area <strong>of</strong> the reservoir realized the potential <strong>of</strong> the soil <strong>of</strong> reservoir basin and<br />

started to cultivate it for the production <strong>of</strong> vegetables on residual soil moisture. However, the<br />

crop yield and pr<strong>of</strong>itability is poor due to fast depletion <strong>of</strong> soil moisture in the absence <strong>of</strong> soil<br />

moisture conservation technologies.<br />

Gradually, several indigenous knowledge or practices has been evolved to enhance<br />

conservation <strong>of</strong> residual soil moisture, productivity and pr<strong>of</strong>itability <strong>of</strong> the cultivation in this<br />

basin. Such an indigenous technology includes production <strong>of</strong> musk melon in the reservoir<br />

basin <strong>of</strong> Hemawas Dam, Pali with indigenous knowledge that is similar to modern concept <strong>of</strong><br />

conservation agriculture. Therefore, we evaluated and compared the socio-economic aspects<br />

<strong>of</strong> indigenously evolved conservation agricultural practices for the cultivation <strong>of</strong> musk melon<br />

in the reservoir basin <strong>of</strong> Hemawas dam with conventional practices <strong>of</strong> musk melon<br />

production.<br />

Climate resilient agriculture for risk mitigation<br />

277 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Methodology<br />

The present study is comprised <strong>of</strong> study<br />

and documentation <strong>of</strong> indigenously<br />

developed conservation technologies for<br />

musk melon cultivation in the reservoir<br />

basin and its comparison with<br />

conventional methods <strong>of</strong> musk melon<br />

cultivation. For this purpose, we selected<br />

10 farmers practicing musk melon<br />

cultivation in the hamawas dam with<br />

indigenous knowledge (25.7343 0 North<br />

latitude and 73.3620 0 East longitudes) and<br />

10 farmers practicing conventional<br />

practice <strong>of</strong> musk melon on the<br />

conventional agricultural land in Naya<br />

Gaon village Sojat Tehsil (25.9238 0 North<br />

latitude and 73.6651 0 East longitudes) Pali<br />

District (Fig). The data on all the<br />

agronomical practices and plant growth,<br />

development and yield attributes were recorded for consecutively for three years (2017, 2018<br />

and 2019) from the field <strong>of</strong> all the selected farmers. From each location, five average size<br />

muskmelon plant and fruits were selected in each year, and data were recorded on different<br />

parameters and economics were calculated on the basis <strong>of</strong> cost <strong>of</strong> cultivation and price <strong>of</strong><br />

fruit prevailing during the period. The mean <strong>of</strong> the data was subjected to analysis <strong>of</strong> variance<br />

(ANOVA) followed by post hoc test at 95% for comparing the significance <strong>of</strong> difference.<br />

Results<br />

Fig : Location map <strong>of</strong> the study area<br />

The growth and yield <strong>of</strong> the musk melon was influenced by both type <strong>of</strong> the cultivation<br />

practice. The growth, development and fruit yield was found significantly higher in<br />

conventional methods <strong>of</strong> cultivation as compared to traditional conservational practices. The<br />

conventional method had higher growth, number <strong>of</strong> fruits per vine (14.7), fruit weight (391.1<br />

g) and fruit yield per plant (5.77 kg) as compared to conservational practices in the reservoir<br />

basin (Table 1, 2 and 3) resulting into higher yield and gross as well as net returns per unit<br />

area. The mean fruits yield per hectare <strong>of</strong> muskmelon was about 25.16 % higher (96.2 t/ha) as<br />

compared to conservation practices (71.99 t/ha) over three years <strong>of</strong> observation. The gross<br />

return was Rs. 5,28,070/ha under conventional methods <strong>of</strong> cultivation while it was Rs.<br />

3,48,220/ha under conservation methods <strong>of</strong> cultivation over three years <strong>of</strong> observation. The<br />

higher yield under conventional system might be attributed to good plant growth due to<br />

278 | Page<br />

Climate resilient agriculture for risk mitigation


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

combined availability <strong>of</strong> soil moisture with proper nutrition and plant protection throughout<br />

the muskmelon growth period. The above results are close conformity with the various<br />

reporters in other crops (Anbumani et al. 2017; Ansary and Roy 2005; Rani et al. 2012).<br />

However, in spite <strong>of</strong> higher yield and net return under conventional systems, the conservation<br />

system was found more pr<strong>of</strong>itable as compared to conventional systems due to significantly<br />

higher benefit cost ratio. It was mainly attributed to low input cost and early maturity <strong>of</strong> the<br />

crops under conservation system as compared to conventional system. Early availability <strong>of</strong><br />

musk melon fruit to the market fetched higher price per unit <strong>of</strong> fruits as compared to late<br />

mature crop under conventional systems resulting in higher B:C ratio combined with low cost<br />

<strong>of</strong> inputs. Further, the consumers preferred the muskmelons grown under conserved moisture<br />

conditions and they pay premium prices for crop due to earliness.<br />

References<br />

Anbumani, S., Nagarajan, R., Pandian, B.J., 2017. Water productivity and pr<strong>of</strong>itability <strong>of</strong><br />

melon-based cropping system under drip fertigation and polyethylene mulching. J.<br />

Innov. Agric. 4(4): 1–8<br />

Ansary, S. H., Roy, D. C., 2005. Effect <strong>of</strong> irrigation and mulching on growth, yield and<br />

quality <strong>of</strong> watermelon (Citrullus lanatus Thunb). Environ Ecol. 23 (Spl-1): 141–143<br />

Faroda, A.S., Joshi, N.L., Singh, R., Saxena, A. 2007. Resource management for sustainable<br />

crop production in arid zone – A review. Indian J Agron. 52(3): 181–93<br />

Rani, R., Nirla, S. K., Suresh, R. 2012. Effect <strong>of</strong> drip irrigation and mulch on pointed gourd<br />

in calcareous soil <strong>of</strong> north Bihar. Environ Ecol. 30(3): 641–645.<br />

T2a-18P-1206<br />

Effect <strong>of</strong> Different Types <strong>of</strong> Mulching on Growth and Productivity <strong>of</strong><br />

Pointed Gourd under Stress Climatic Condition<br />

C. Saha Parya, S. Biswas, F. H. Rahman and K. Mondal<br />

Dhaanyaganga Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Ramakrishna Mission Ashrama, Sargachhi under aegis<br />

RKMVERI, Belur-Math, Howrah, WB, India,<br />

ATARI, Eastern Zone, ICAR, Kolkata, WB, India<br />

The earliest known example where the use <strong>of</strong> mulch as an agricultural technique was<br />

discussed in written record comes from China, around 500 BC. Since then the benefit <strong>of</strong><br />

mulching is well established. The main benefits <strong>of</strong> mulching are early crop production, higher<br />

yields with better product quality, more efficient water use, reduced leaching <strong>of</strong> fertilizers,<br />

soil and wind erosion, reduced herbicide application, weed control, and others related to pest<br />

and disease management (Lamont, 2005). Some <strong>of</strong> these benefits are especially relevant in<br />

Climate resilient agriculture for risk mitigation<br />

279 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

organic farming, rainfed condition, areas with limited resource facilities and also present<br />

scenario <strong>of</strong> climate change. Under climate change scenario, agriculture is experiencing<br />

adverse effects <strong>of</strong> increasing temperature, shifting seasonal rainfall and frequent occurrence<br />

<strong>of</strong> natural calamity. As a consequence, the time has come when farming should not always be<br />

input responsive rather it should be conservative in nature and to be planned in manner for<br />

efficient utilization <strong>of</strong> available resources. In the operational area, the pointed gourd is<br />

generally experiencing a long dry spell (from the time <strong>of</strong> planting to next 3-4 months crop<br />

growth period) as well as low crop growth rate, weed population hinder the crop production.<br />

Thus present investigation was planned to evaluate the effect <strong>of</strong> different types <strong>of</strong> mulching<br />

on growth and productivity <strong>of</strong> pointed gourd under climate change condition.<br />

Methodology<br />

Present study was designed as per mandate <strong>of</strong> On-Farm Trial in farmer’s field <strong>of</strong> Raninagar II<br />

Block, Murshidabad, West Bengal during consecutive two years 2020-21 and 2021-22 by the<br />

Dhaanyaganga Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Ramakrishna Mission Ashrama, Sargachhi. There<br />

were four treatments including T1: Control (Without mulch), T2: Black Polythene Mulch, T3:<br />

Paddy Straw Mulch, T 4: Water Hyacinth Mulch. The pointed gourd (cv. Kajli) was planted in<br />

1 st fortnight <strong>of</strong> February and grown for 10-11 months. The experiment was laid out in<br />

Randomized Block Design with five replications.<br />

Results<br />

From the pooled data <strong>of</strong> two years, it was clearly noticed that all mulch treatments resulted<br />

significantly better plant growth compared to the control (without mulch). The vine length<br />

and vine girth <strong>of</strong> pointed gourd (at 90 DAS) was maximum when the crop was planted with<br />

black polythene mulch. It was followed by the paddy straw mulch and water hyacinth mulch.<br />

At 90 DAS, the un mulched plots showed a greater diversity <strong>of</strong> weed species than the<br />

mulched plots. The number <strong>of</strong> weed and dry weight <strong>of</strong> weed per m 2 showed significant<br />

differences in the different mulched treatments. Plots mulched with black polythene had the<br />

lowest number <strong>of</strong> invading weed species followed by straw mulch. Black polythene and straw<br />

mulch proved effective for weed suppression than the un mulched treatments which was<br />

traditionally practiced in the area. Weed infestation resulted in 20-25% yield loss. Among the<br />

mulch treatments Black Polythene mulch effectively controlled weeds by cutting down solar<br />

radiation, resulting in etiolated growth and the eventual death <strong>of</strong> weeds under the flim. Ossom<br />

et al. (2001) also observed significant differences in weed control between mulched and un<br />

mulched plots <strong>of</strong> sweet potato.<br />

Results <strong>of</strong> pooled analysis (Table) showed that application <strong>of</strong> black polythene mulch recorded<br />

significantly higher yield (23.87 tonnes/ha) followed by the paddy straw mulching (22.03 t/<br />

ha). When the entire effort and results were transferred in terms <strong>of</strong> economics, it was clearly<br />

280 | Page<br />

Climate resilient agriculture for risk mitigation


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

indicated that among the mulching material, black polythene mulch was found most efficient<br />

with higher yields maximum net return as well benefit: cost ratio. The cost <strong>of</strong> production in<br />

control plot was low on the contrary due to lower productivity net return and benefit: cost<br />

ratio was less (Table). It was also effective in resource conservation through reducing weed<br />

infestation, reducing the evaporation loss thereby enhancing the water use efficiency,<br />

reducing the nutrient loss and maintaining favorable soil micro-climate. These factors<br />

cumulatively triggered growth attributes which in turn showed synergistic effect on the<br />

productivity <strong>of</strong> the pointed gourd. The result is corroborated with the findings <strong>of</strong><br />

Ramakrishna et al 2006.<br />

Effect <strong>of</strong> different mulching treatments on growth attributes, productivity and<br />

economics <strong>of</strong> pointed gourd and weed growth in the field (Pooled <strong>of</strong> two years)<br />

Treatment<br />

Vine<br />

length<br />

(cm)<br />

Vine<br />

girth<br />

(cm)<br />

Number <strong>of</strong><br />

branches<br />

per plant<br />

Nos. <strong>of</strong><br />

weed<br />

per m 2<br />

Dry weight<br />

<strong>of</strong> weed per<br />

m 2 (g)<br />

Fruit<br />

Yield<br />

(t/ha)<br />

Net<br />

return<br />

(Rs./ha)<br />

B:C<br />

ratio<br />

T 1 193 2.57 6.40 123.3 40.8 19.47 142180 2.55<br />

T 2 224 3.34 8.13 54.0 12.4 23.87 191640 3.02<br />

T 3: 213 3.23 7.70 84.7 24.67 22.03 177860 2.89<br />

T 4: 204 3.09 7.33 90.3 28.3 21.37 163740 2.76<br />

S.Em (±) 3.03 0.08 0.11 6.32 2.45 0.36 - -<br />

CD at 5% 9.01 0.23 0.32 18.05 7.07 1.11 - -<br />

It may be inferred from the study that all the mulch treatments showed significant<br />

improvement on crop growth and yield components <strong>of</strong> pointed gourd over the traditional or<br />

without mulch treatment It ultimately resulted in a yield increase <strong>of</strong> 22.6 %. The<br />

improvement in yield was higher in black polythene mulch treatment followed by paddy<br />

straw mulch. Thus, it may be recommended that the black polythene mulch is useful for<br />

pointed gourd production system with higher economic return.<br />

References<br />

Lamont, J., 2005. Modifying the microclimate for the production <strong>of</strong> vegetable crops. Hort.<br />

technol. 15, 477-481.<br />

Ossom, E.M., Pace, P.F., Rhykerd, R.L., Rhykerd, C.L. 2001. Effect <strong>of</strong> mulch on weed<br />

infestation, soil temperature, nutrient concentration, and tuber yield in Ipomoea<br />

batatus (L.) Lam. In Papua New Guinea. Trop. Agric. (Trinidad) 78, 144–151.<br />

Ramakrishna, A., Tam, H.M., Wani, S.P., Long, T.D. 2006. Effect <strong>of</strong> mulch on soil<br />

temperature, moisture, weed infestation and yield <strong>of</strong> groundnut in northern Vietnam.<br />

Field Crop Res. 95, 115-125.<br />

Climate resilient agriculture for risk mitigation<br />

281 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

T2a-19P-1231<br />

Demonstration <strong>of</strong> Climate Resilient Practices to Sustain Crop Productivity<br />

in Various Climatic Vulnerability Situations<br />

Dayanand, Rashid Khan, Rajendra Nagar, Raghunandan Khatana<br />

Krishi Vigyan kendra, Abusar-Jhunjhunu<br />

Jhunjhunu district <strong>of</strong> Rajasthan lies between 27° 38′ & 28° 31′ north latitude and 75° 02′ and<br />

76° 06′ east longitude. It has been categorized under transitional plain <strong>of</strong> inland drainage zone<br />

among 10 agro-climatic zones <strong>of</strong> Rajasthan. This zone receives only 300-400 mm average<br />

rainfall annually. A national project “National Interventions on Climate Resilient Agriculture<br />

(NICRA) was sanctioned by ICAR-CRIDA in 2011 at Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Jhunjhunu to<br />

demonstrate suitable climate resilient practices at farmers field to sustain crop productivity in<br />

various climate vulnerability situations.<br />

Village Bharu in Mandawa block <strong>of</strong> Jhunjhunu district was selected by Krishi Vigyan<br />

Kendra, Jhunjhunu in NICRA project. Village Bharu has several climatic vulnerabilities Viz.,<br />

drought, low and erratic rainfall, frost, hot winds, low fertility, saline ground water etc. Krishi<br />

Vigyan kendra, Abusar-Jhunjhunu started demonstration <strong>of</strong> resilient practices to sustain<br />

productivity <strong>of</strong> crops in above vulnerability situations as follows: 1. Natural resource<br />

management: Soils <strong>of</strong> village are low fertile, sandy loam and having high pH. Ground water<br />

in village is saline having high pH and high EC. The resilient practices demonstrated are<br />

growing <strong>of</strong> green manure crop, Application <strong>of</strong> FYM, vermi-composting to maintain soil<br />

fertility, use <strong>of</strong> gypsum to maintain soil pH, 2. Crop demonstration: growing <strong>of</strong> short<br />

duration, high yielding and drought resilient varieties, integrated crop management practices,<br />

integrated insect-pest and disease management practices, use <strong>of</strong> agro-chemicals to mitigate<br />

drought, frost and terminal heat, 3. Livestock: scientific management <strong>of</strong> dairy animals, breed<br />

upgradation, feeding <strong>of</strong> mineral mixture, timely vaccination, feeding <strong>of</strong> azolla and green<br />

fodder round the year, improved shelter to avoid cold and heat stress, 4. Institutional<br />

intervention: establishment <strong>of</strong> Custom Hiring Centre, seed bank fodder bank. Results<br />

revealed that above practices are effective to sustain crop productivity in various climatic<br />

vulnerability situations.<br />

282 | Page<br />

Climate resilient agriculture for risk mitigation


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

T2a-20P-1239<br />

Makhana a Highly Pr<strong>of</strong>itable Venture under Flood Prone Waterlogged<br />

Areas<br />

Hemant Kumar Singh 1 , M.K. Roy 1 , Amrendra Kumar 2 and Anjani Kumar 2<br />

1 Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Kishanganj-813210, Bihar, India<br />

2 Agricultural Technology Application and Research Institute (ATARI), Patna, India<br />

India is the highest makhana producing country and it is also cultivated in Korea, Japan, and<br />

Russia some extent. It is also known as gorgon nuts. It originates from lotus seeds. Foxnut<br />

(Makhana) can be consumed alone as roasted one, desert items and can be combined with<br />

vegetables and prepared as a delicious porridge after popping it like corn. Makhana farming<br />

has the potential to be highly pr<strong>of</strong>itable, and its seeds are referred as a "black diamond." It<br />

has been demonstrated that the net pr<strong>of</strong>it from this aquatic cash crop. Fox nut or gorgon nut<br />

has significantly a larger area than the other cash crops and is being traditionally cultivated in<br />

the Mithila region <strong>of</strong> Bihar. It has been established that makhana is a highly nutritious cuisine<br />

that is also beneficial for daily health. Its pops pose many vitamins, essential minerals,<br />

digestible fibre and fat free organic produce consisting <strong>of</strong> many nutrient elements. For its<br />

successful cultivation requires a temperature range <strong>of</strong> 20 to 35 0 C for proper growth and<br />

development, as well as a relative humidity <strong>of</strong> 50-90 per cent and annual rainfall <strong>of</strong> 1000-<br />

2500 mm. Bihar alone produces more than 85% <strong>of</strong> all makhana produced in India and making<br />

it the nation's top producer. The state Kishanganj is one <strong>of</strong> the top Makhana producers’<br />

districts. Makhana is cultivated either in perennial water bodies having water depth <strong>of</strong> 4-6 ft<br />

or in the field system. Field system: This is a new Makhana cultivation system that the<br />

research institute has standardised. Makhana cultivation is carried out in agriculture fields at a<br />

water depth <strong>of</strong> one foot in the system. The Makhana seedlings are initially grown in a nursery<br />

before being transplanted at the right time into the main field. The transplanting might take<br />

place anywhere from the first week <strong>of</strong> February to the third week <strong>of</strong> April, depending on the<br />

availability <strong>of</strong> the field and nursery. The length <strong>of</strong> the Makhana crop is shortened by this<br />

approach by up to four months. Helping farmers replace traditional cultivation systems with<br />

new methods, as well as providing commensurate subsidies, will result in a complete<br />

overhaul <strong>of</strong> the cultivation system, increasing per hectare yield and thus increasing the<br />

incomes <strong>of</strong> millions. Recently Makhana <strong>of</strong> Bihar received GI tag.<br />

Methodology<br />

The study was carried out by the Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Kishanganj. Demonstrations were<br />

conducted with the selected 06 farmers <strong>of</strong> adopted village covering <strong>of</strong> unproductive and<br />

water logged due to flood area <strong>of</strong> 08 ha under NICRA project during 2021-22. Planting was<br />

done during 3 rd week <strong>of</strong> February. Demonstrations were conducted to study the gap between<br />

Climate resilient agriculture for risk mitigation<br />

283 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

the potential yield <strong>of</strong> Sabour Makhana-1 (33.5 q ha -1 , demonstration yield, technology gap<br />

and technology index in technology dissemination in adopted village under the objective <strong>of</strong><br />

flood vulnerability <strong>of</strong> NICRA programme. The farmers were guided by KVK scientists in<br />

respect <strong>of</strong> package <strong>of</strong> practices to be followed during the crop season. The data on output <strong>of</strong><br />

improved variety was recorded. Technology gap and technology index were calculated using<br />

following formula as suggested by Samui et al. (2000).<br />

Technology gap (kg ha -1 ) = Potential yield - Demonstration yield<br />

Technology Index (%) = Potential yield - Demonstration yield / Potential yield X 100<br />

Results<br />

The results <strong>of</strong> demonstration revealed that average nut yield <strong>of</strong> 27.24 q ha -1 were obtained<br />

during 2021-22. The technological gap (9.2 q ha -1 ) during 2021-22, reflected the farmer’s<br />

cooperation in carrying out such demonstrations. The technology gap observed may be<br />

attributed to variability in soil fertility and climatic conditions. More adoption <strong>of</strong> recent<br />

production technologies with high yielding varieties would subsequently change with timeto-time<br />

brain storming <strong>of</strong> stakeholders. The technology index showed the feasibility <strong>of</strong> the<br />

evolved technology at the selected field <strong>of</strong> village. The lowest values (27.46 %) <strong>of</strong><br />

technology index indicate the more feasibility <strong>of</strong> the technology. The average net return/ha<br />

from the demonstration was Rs. 1,58,150/- and total return Rs.12,65,200/- from demonstrated<br />

land <strong>of</strong> adopted village under NICRA programme.<br />

Conclusion<br />

The result finds out that yield <strong>of</strong> makhana crop could be increased with the intervention <strong>of</strong><br />

newly released variety Sabour Makhana-1 under water logged area due to the effect <strong>of</strong> flood<br />

hence, adopting integrated approach in cultivation <strong>of</strong> makhana will increase the income as<br />

well as the livelihood <strong>of</strong> the farmers.<br />

References<br />

Samui, S.K., Mitra, S., Roy, D.K., Mandal, A.K. and Saha, D. 2000 Evaluation <strong>of</strong> frontline<br />

demonstration on groundnut. J. Ind. Society Costal Agric. Res. 18(2):180-183.<br />

284 | Page<br />

Climate resilient agriculture for risk mitigation


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

T2a-21P-1243<br />

Effect <strong>of</strong> Different Sowing Dates and Nitrogen Levels on the Productivity <strong>of</strong><br />

Wet-Seeded kharif Rice under Post-Flood Situation in Assam<br />

K. S. Teja, K. Kurmi, K. Pathak, J. Goswami and A. Hazarika<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Agronomy, Assam Agricultural University, Jorhat, Assam, India, 785013<br />

Rice (Oryza sativa L.), the world's important crop, is the primary food source for nearly half<br />

<strong>of</strong> the world's population. The total area under rice cultivation in Assam is 23.60 lakh<br />

hectares with a production <strong>of</strong> 52.60 lakh tonnes and productivity <strong>of</strong> 2,228 kg/ha. The<br />

optimum time <strong>of</strong> transplanting <strong>of</strong> sali or kharif rice under the agro climatic conditions <strong>of</strong><br />

Assam is from the first week <strong>of</strong> July to the middle <strong>of</strong> August with 30-35 days old seedlings <strong>of</strong><br />

long duration varieties. But, in practice, farmers <strong>of</strong> the state cannot complete transplanting<br />

within the optimum period due to many reasons and one <strong>of</strong> them being flood in the low-lying<br />

areas <strong>of</strong> Assam. High intensity <strong>of</strong> rainfall during the peak period <strong>of</strong> transplanting <strong>of</strong>ten<br />

submerges the crop resulting in partial or complete crop damage. These factors demand a<br />

major shift from puddled transplanting to wet direct seeding <strong>of</strong> rice with shorter duration high<br />

yielding photoperiod insensitive stress tolerant varieties in puddled condition. Since rice yield<br />

and quality are not only controlled by the method <strong>of</strong> establishment but are also largely<br />

influenced by environmental factors (Shimono et al., 2002), which can be manipulated to<br />

optimum level through different management practices <strong>of</strong> which sowing date and nitrogen<br />

fertilization are <strong>of</strong> prime importance. The right sowing date ensures vegetative growth during<br />

a period <strong>of</strong> satisfactory temperature and high levels <strong>of</strong> solar radiation (Farrell et al., 2003).<br />

The absence <strong>of</strong> transplanting shock in wet-seeded rice results in rapid vegetative growth<br />

during the early growth period and this results in N deficiency at the reproductive phase.<br />

Insufficient and inappropriate fertilizer nitrogen management may result in one half to two<br />

thirds <strong>of</strong> the gap between actual and potential yields. Therefore, the experiment was<br />

conducted considering the importance <strong>of</strong> dates <strong>of</strong> sowing and nitrogen management in<br />

delayed sali rice in Assam.<br />

Methodology<br />

A field experiment was conducted in Assam Agricultural University, Jorhat, Assam during<br />

the kharif season <strong>of</strong> 2020 and 2021. The experiment was laid out in split-plot design<br />

comprising twenty treatment combinations with four dates <strong>of</strong> sowing viz., 10 th August, 20 th<br />

August, 30 th August and 9 th September in main plots and five levels <strong>of</strong> nitrogen viz., 40 kg,<br />

60 kg, 80 kg, 100 kg and 120 kg ha -1 in sub plots. The rice variety used as a test crop was<br />

Bina dhan-11. Fertilizer was applied in the form <strong>of</strong> urea, single super phosphate and muriate<br />

<strong>of</strong> potash in both the years. All the data pertaining to the present investigation were<br />

Climate resilient agriculture for risk mitigation<br />

285 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

statistically analysed using Analysis <strong>of</strong> Variance (ANOVA), critical difference (CD) at a 5 %<br />

probability level was calculated only when the F value was significant.<br />

Results<br />

Influence <strong>of</strong> dates <strong>of</strong> sowing and levels <strong>of</strong> nitrogen on yield attributing characters, grain<br />

yield and straw yield<br />

Treatment<br />

A. Dates <strong>of</strong> sowing<br />

Panicles<br />

m -2<br />

Panicle<br />

length<br />

(cm)<br />

Filled<br />

grains<br />

panicle -1<br />

1000 grain<br />

weight (g)<br />

Grain<br />

yield (q ha -<br />

1<br />

)<br />

10 th August 222.60 22.96 98.21 26.47 31.56 37.65<br />

20 th August 217.93 21.96 86.76 26.29 26.18 39.17<br />

30 th August 204.89 21.31 76.63 26.07 20.82 46.46<br />

09 th September 182.68 20.59 56.75 23.90 9.95 52.18<br />

SEm (±) 2.37 0.18 2.55 0.06 0.69 1.46<br />

CD (5%) 8.21 0.63 8.83 0.22 2.39 5.04<br />

B. Levels <strong>of</strong> nitrogen<br />

40 kg/ha 189.20 20.42 73.16 25.34 17.54 37.79<br />

60 kg/ha 198.44 21.42 75.11 25.54 20.24 41.59<br />

80 kg/ha 206.51 21.96 78.87 25.67 22.70 44.68<br />

100 kg/ha 221.99 22.63 87.01 25.92 25.70 45.57<br />

120 kg/ha 218.98 22.11 83.77 25.94 24.47 49.68<br />

SEm (±) 2.54 0.18 1.94 0.07 0.69 1.49<br />

CD (5%) 7.31 0.51 5.59 0.22 1.99 4.29<br />

Interaction (AxB) ** NS NS NS NS NS<br />

** Significant, NS- Non-significant<br />

Straw yield<br />

(q ha -1 )<br />

Among the different dates <strong>of</strong> sowing, 10 th August sowing date recorded the highest number<br />

<strong>of</strong> panicles m -2 , panicle length, total number <strong>of</strong> grains panicle -1 , number <strong>of</strong> filled grains<br />

panicle -1 , 1000 grain weight and grain yield (Table). This might be due to favorable weather<br />

conditions during the critical growth stages like panicle initiation, flowering (growth<br />

attributes) and grain filling periods and also the availability <strong>of</strong> more time for better growth<br />

(Singh et al., 2004) which may lead to the increase in all growth attributes. Whereas as the<br />

sowing was delayed, the straw yield increased significantly with the highest in 9 th September<br />

sown crop. The increase in straw yield with delayed sowing might be due to the unfavourable<br />

weather conditions experienced by the crop which might have restricted the translocation <strong>of</strong><br />

photosynthates from source to sink. Among the nitrogen levels, 100 kg N ha -1 recorded<br />

highest growth attributes and grain yield but was statistically at par with 120 kg N ha -1 . The<br />

highest 1000 grain weight and straw yield were recorded in 120 kg N ha -1 (Table).<br />

286 | Page<br />

Climate resilient agriculture for risk mitigation


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Conclusion<br />

From the present investigation it has been clearly evident that the crop sown on 10 th August<br />

and fertilized with 100 kg N ha -1 was found to be beneficial under post-flood situation in<br />

Assam.<br />

References<br />

Shimono, H., Hasegawa, T., and Iwama, K. 2002. Response <strong>of</strong> growth and grain yield in<br />

paddy rice to cool water at different growth stages. Field Crops Res. 73, (3): 67-79.<br />

Farrell, T. C., Fox R. L., Williams, Fukai, S. and Lewin, L.G. 2003. Avoiding low<br />

temperature damage in Australia’s rice industry with photoperiod sensitive cultivars.<br />

Proceedings <strong>of</strong> the 11 th Australian Agronomy Conference, 2-6 Feb. Geelong, Victoria,<br />

Australia: Deakin.<br />

Singh, T., Shivay, Y.S. and Singh, S. 2004. Effect <strong>of</strong> date <strong>of</strong> transplanting and nitrogen on<br />

productivity and nitrogen use indices in hybrid and non-hybrid aromatic rice. Acta<br />

Agron. Hung. 52, (3): 245-252.<br />

T2a-22P-1248<br />

Effect <strong>of</strong> Black Cumin (Nigella sativa) and Garlic (Allium sativum) as<br />

Natural Feed Additive on Growth Performance <strong>of</strong> Kaveri Chicken<br />

G. K. Londhe* and S. S. Shinde<br />

Vasantrao Naik Marathwada Krishi Vidyapeeth, Parbhani 431402<br />

* glondhe71@gmail.com<br />

Poultry is one <strong>of</strong> fastest growing segments <strong>of</strong> agriculture sector in India. Feed additive are<br />

important materials that can improve the efficiency <strong>of</strong> feed utilization, animal performance<br />

and enhance immune response. At present numbers <strong>of</strong> feed additives are used to feed broiler<br />

birds for the purpose <strong>of</strong> increase in body weight gain and improve feed efficiency (FCR).<br />

However, availability <strong>of</strong> quality feed at the reasonable cost is a key to successful poultry<br />

operation (Basak et al. 2002). Black cumin seed (Nigella sativa) is called as black seed, kala<br />

jira or kalongiis an annual herbaceous flowering <strong>of</strong> Ranunculaceae family and native to<br />

southwest Asia. The seed <strong>of</strong> black cumin has been used for centuries in the Middle East,<br />

Northern Africa, Far East and Asia for the treatment <strong>of</strong> asthma and as an antitumor agent.<br />

Black cumin seed have been used in traditional medicine as diuretic and antihypertensive,<br />

digestive and appetite stimulant; also have antibacterial, antioxidant, antidibetic, anticancer,<br />

antiparasitic, analgesic, renal protective and anti-inflammatory properties due to presence <strong>of</strong><br />

pharmacologically active compound like thymoquinone, dithymoquinone thymohydroquinone<br />

and thymol (Guler et al., 2006). Garlic (Allium sativum) which belongs to the family<br />

Climate resilient agriculture for risk mitigation<br />

287 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Alliaceae and the genus Allium is widely distributed and used in all over the world as a spice<br />

and herbal remedy for the prevention and treatment <strong>of</strong> variety <strong>of</strong> diseases (Javandel et al.,<br />

2008). The key active ingredients in garlic is a powerful plant chemical called allicin which<br />

rapidly decomposes to several volatile oregano-sulphur compounds and it also contains<br />

organic sulphurous compounds such as allin, ajoene, ally propyl disulfide, dially trisulfide<br />

(Mansoub,2011). Moreover, garlic is very rich in aromatic oils, which enhances digestion and<br />

positively influenced respiratory system being inhaled into air sacs and lungs <strong>of</strong> bird.<br />

Therefore, present investigation was planned to study the effect <strong>of</strong> black cumin and garlic as<br />

a natural feed additive on growth performance <strong>of</strong> Kaveri chicken with the following<br />

objectives<br />

Methodology<br />

The Black cumin seed was mixed in basal diet as per treatments. Garlic was manually descaled<br />

and crushed with the help <strong>of</strong> grinder and subjected for hot air oven drying process at 50 0 C for 8<br />

hours. Ccommercial pre-starter, starter and finisher was procured from local market. Total three<br />

trials were conducted and every trial was conducted on 200-day old Kaveri chicks; obtained from<br />

local hatchery. On arrival, the chicks were weighted individually and randomly divided into five<br />

treatments with four replications and each replication has ten birds. Electric brooder was used to<br />

provide sufficient heat and light for first week <strong>of</strong> age.<br />

Birds were reared on deep litter system using dry paddy husk in a well-ventilated house. A<br />

weighed quantity <strong>of</strong> feed was <strong>of</strong>fered ad-libitum to the experimental birds distributed in each<br />

treatment throughout day along with Fresh, clean, cool, potable drinking water. drinkers, feeders,<br />

and other equipment were cleaned and disinfected with 0.02% KMno4 solution every day. Lime<br />

was applied on side walls and floor with the aim to reduce the infestation before each trial. The<br />

treatments were T1- Basal diet (Control); T2- Basal diet + Antibiotic (BMD @ 250g/Tonne <strong>of</strong><br />

feed); T 3- Basal diet + 1% Black cumin seed; T 4- Basal diet + 1% Garlic mash; T 5- Basal diet +<br />

0.5% Black cumin seed + 0.5% Garlic mash.<br />

Gain in body weight (g) per bird and feed conversion ratios <strong>of</strong> experimental birds<br />

(Pooled from trial I, II and III)<br />

Treatments Gain in body weight (g) per bird Feed conversion ratios<br />

T 1 1327.90 e 2.71 a<br />

T 2 1507.30 a 2.56 c<br />

T 3 1407.70 d 2.65 ab<br />

T 4 1426.60 c 2.63 bc<br />

T 5 1468.60 b 2.60 bc<br />

SE± 5.16 0.023<br />

C.D.at 5% 14.29 0.066<br />

(Means bearing different superscripts within a column differ significantly (P


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Results<br />

The total gain in body weight <strong>of</strong> bird among treatment groups T2 was significantly higher<br />

(P


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

T2a-23P-1249<br />

Models <strong>of</strong> Integrated Farming Systems Resilient to Soil Erosion in a<br />

Changing Climate in Mountain Agriculture<br />

B.U. Choudhury, V. K. Mishra, T. Ramesh, and A. Balusamy<br />

ICAR Research Complex for NEH Region, Umiam, Meghalaya-793 103<br />

Land degradation due to soil erosion (SE) in the tropical mountain ecosystem is a serious<br />

environmental issue affecting agronomic development and ecosystem functions (Lobo &<br />

Bonilla, 2019; Pijl et al., 2020). In the eastern Himalayan India (EHI), more than two-fifths <strong>of</strong><br />

the 26.2 million ha are subject to soil erosion and increased rainfall intensity in a changing<br />

climate exacerbates the threat to agricultural production. The main reason is large-scale<br />

deforestation, burning <strong>of</strong> vegetation, the expansion <strong>of</strong> shifting and sedentary agriculture along<br />

the steep slopes <strong>of</strong> the highlands, and abandonment <strong>of</strong> cropland. Such a shift from forest to<br />

traditional agriculture in sloping uplands has led to an estimated annual soil loss <strong>of</strong> 229.5 t ha -<br />

1<br />

(Choudhury et al., 2022). Cultivated uplands (sedentary and shifting agriculture) in the<br />

region cover only 1.0 M ha (only 4.04% GA) (Choudhury et al., 2021) and additional<br />

horizontal expansion without degradation <strong>of</strong> virgin forests is next to impossible. It is an<br />

ecological and economic compulsion for the region to diversify the agricultural production<br />

system, involving multiple complementary farming enterprises in the form <strong>of</strong> an integrated<br />

farming system (IFS) mode. Given this need, micro-watershed scale IFS models were<br />

introduced into the region's mountain ecosystem in the 1980s. To identify more resilient IFSs<br />

and design adaptation strategies in the context <strong>of</strong> soil erosion sensitivity to climate<br />

change, we evaluated the response <strong>of</strong> such hilly micro-watershed (HMW) based six IFS<br />

models, using field and simulation approaches (as per the Water Erosion Prediction Project,<br />

WEPP).<br />

Methodology<br />

Six micro-watershed based (HMW) IFS models were developed on a forested hill slope<br />

(32.0-53.18%) <strong>of</strong> the ICAR research complex for the NEH area, Umiam, Meghalaya.<br />

These were forestry (HMW 1), abandoned shifting cultivation (HMW 2), livestock with fodder<br />

crops (HMW3), agr<strong>of</strong>orestry (HMW4), agri-horti-silvi-pastoral (HMW5), and horticulture<br />

(HMW 6). Different soil water conservation measures (SWCMs) such as contouring,<br />

terracing, grassed waterways, and vegetative barriers were adopted in all except HMW 1. All<br />

these HMWs were gauged at the outlet to measure run<strong>of</strong>f and soil loss for 24 years. The<br />

WEPP model was calibrated and validated with measured run<strong>of</strong>f and soil loss data for each <strong>of</strong><br />

the six IFSs. Simulations on soil erosion were carried out for the baseline period (1976–2005)<br />

and three future time slices, i.e., early (2020s), mid (2050s), and end-century (2080s) under<br />

four RCPs, i.e., RCP2.6, RCP4.5, RCP6.0, and RCP8.5. The relative percent change in run<strong>of</strong>f<br />

290 | Page<br />

Climate resilient agriculture for risk mitigation


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

and soil loss over the future periods was estimated using the respective baseline values.<br />

Plausible adaptation strategies were simulated in two categories: (i) residue<br />

addition/mulching (organic and inorganic) and (ii) sub-surface drainage system (plastic pipes<br />

and clay tile at 0.61 m deep) on cultivated HMWs, i.e., HMW3 to HMW6. The residue<br />

considered to be locally available dry beans, field beans, soybeans, maize, broom grasses, and<br />

stone mulch in the inter-cropped area.<br />

Results<br />

Measured soil erosion revealed that forests (HMW 1) had a mean (<strong>of</strong> 24 years) annual run<strong>of</strong>f<br />

loss <strong>of</strong> 405.5 (±113) mm, while soil loss was 11.0 (±2.4) Mg ha -1 yr -1 . In the cultivated<br />

HMWs (HMW4, 5 & 6), adoption <strong>of</strong> soil water conservation measures (SWCMs) reduced the<br />

run<strong>of</strong>f by 13.0% – 17.1% and soil loss by 12.6%–15.1% over HMW 1. However, in shifting<br />

cultivation (HMW7), run<strong>of</strong>f increased by 50.6%–87.6%, while soil loss was 50.3%–59.8%<br />

higher over the forest. The average annual run<strong>of</strong>f calibrated and validated by the<br />

WEPP model was comparable to the measured run<strong>of</strong>f and the differences were negligible (p<br />

< 0.05). The normalized RMSEn was 0.81<br />

during calibration and >0.75 during validation periods for all HMWs, indicating that model<br />

performance could be assessed as "very good".<br />

The projected annual SE (average) for all HMWs increased in all RCPs. The IFS based on<br />

shifting cultivation (HMW2) was the most vulnerable, with the highest percentage increase in<br />

SE (46–235%) compared to the baseline years under RCP 8.5. The cultivated IFSs (HMW3 to<br />

HMW 6) had 47.8–57.0% less run<strong>of</strong>f and 39.2–74.6% less soil loss than HMW 2 under RCP<br />

8.5. Of these, HMW6 followed by HMW4 and HMW5 were more effective in minimizing soil<br />

loss (Table 1). The simulated the effects <strong>of</strong> mulching (both organic and inorganic) in all the<br />

cultivated IFSs (HMW 3 to HMW 6) declined with an increase in the mulch application rate<br />

from 5.0 to 20 t ha -1 . Among organic mulches used, broom grass mulching at an application<br />

rate <strong>of</strong> 20 t ha -1 resulted in a maximum reduction in soil loss <strong>of</strong> 8.7, 9.3, and 11.9 t ha -1 yr -1 in<br />

the years 2020s, 2050s, and 2080s, respectively, compared to non-mulching. However, with a<br />

low residue application <strong>of</strong> 5 t ha -1 , dry bean residues were most effective in controlling soil<br />

erosion. Under stone mulching, simulated soil loss is projected to decrease in the range <strong>of</strong> 7.7<br />

to 13.3 t ha -1 yr -1 when applied @ 20 t ha -1 during 2080s. The adoption <strong>of</strong> underground<br />

drainage systems has demonstrated that the 6-inch diameter plastic pipe installed at a distance<br />

<strong>of</strong> 7 m provides a greater reduction in projected SE than a clay tile <strong>of</strong> the same diameter<br />

installed at a distance <strong>of</strong> 24 meters.<br />

Climate resilient agriculture for risk mitigation<br />

291 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Projected run<strong>of</strong>f and soil losses (% increase over baseline) under low to high<br />

emission climate change scenarios in different IFS based hilly micro-watersheds<br />

(HMWs)<br />

HMWs<br />

4 RCPs<br />

Baseline<br />

Projected annual soil loss<br />

% change (+) w.r.t. baseline<br />

t ha -1 yr -1 2020s 2050s 2080s<br />

Forest (HMW 1) Mean # 15.40 14.5 11.2 28.9<br />

Shifting cultivation (HMW 2) Mean # 39.54 68.4 94.4 150.4<br />

Livestock with fodder (HMW 3) Mean # 33.14 11.5 15.1 61.1<br />

Agr<strong>of</strong>orestry (HMW 4) Mean # 26.66 17.5 20.2 40.4<br />

Agri-horti-silvi-pastoral (HMW 5) Mean # 29.17 21.6 22.1 44.4<br />

Horticulture (HMW 6) Mean # 21.65 15.4 16.8 35.5<br />

#<br />

: Average over 4 RCPs (RCP2.6, RCP4.5, RCP6.0, and RCP8.5).<br />

Conclusion<br />

The results from the measured data suggest that cultivation in IFS mode (especially<br />

Agr<strong>of</strong>orestry and Horticulture) can reduce annual run<strong>of</strong>f and soil loss by over 10-15%<br />

relative to dense forests. This decline is attributable to the stability <strong>of</strong> land use practices and<br />

the adoption <strong>of</strong> SWCMs, specifically the combination <strong>of</strong> terracing, contour Bund, and grass<br />

waterways together than the only contour bunding in the IFS based on forage and livestock<br />

(HMW 3). Soil erosion projected in the CMIP5 climate change projections for four PCRs has<br />

shown an upward trend for future periods (2020, 2050 and 2080). The maximum SE was<br />

estimated in the shifting cultivation-based IFS (HMW 2) while the lowest was in forestry<br />

followed by horticulture and agr<strong>of</strong>orestry. Therefore, it is recommended to promote IFS<br />

models based on horticulture and Agr<strong>of</strong>orestry with SWCMs on steep slopes to control soil<br />

erosion while providing food and nutritional security. Mulching or installing underground<br />

drainage as adaptation strategies may make these cultivated IFS models more climate<br />

resilient.<br />

References<br />

Choudhury, B.U., Ansari, M.A., Chakraborty, M., and Meetei, T.T. 2021. Effect <strong>of</strong> land-use change<br />

along altitudinal gradients on soil micronutrients in the mountain ecosystem <strong>of</strong> Indian (Eastern)<br />

Himalaya. Sci. Rep. 11, 14279.<br />

Choudhury, B. U., Nengzouzam, G., Ansari, M. A., and Islam, A. 2022. Causes and consequences <strong>of</strong><br />

soil erosion in northeastern Himalaya, India. Curr. Sci. 122(7), 1–18.<br />

Lobo, G. P., and Bonilla, C. A., Predicting soil loss and sediment characteristics at the plot and field<br />

scales: Model description and first verifications. Catena. 172, 113–124.<br />

Pijl, A., Lara, E. H., Quarella, E. R., Vogel, T. A., and Tarolli, P., GIS-based soil erosion modelling<br />

under various steep-slope vineyard practices. Catena, 2020, 193, 104604.<br />

292 | Page<br />

Climate resilient agriculture for risk mitigation


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

T2a-24P-1308<br />

Effect <strong>of</strong> Different Planting Dates and Varieties on Growth and Yield <strong>of</strong><br />

Rice (Oryza Sativa) under Irrigated Subtropics <strong>of</strong> J&K UT<br />

Monika Banotra*, Mahender Singh, B.C.Sharma and Charu Sharma<br />

Sher-e-Kashmir University <strong>of</strong> Agricultural Sciences &Technology <strong>of</strong> Jammu,<br />

Chatha, Jammu 180 009 U.T. <strong>of</strong> J&K, India<br />

* monikabanotra6@gmail.com<br />

Rice is one <strong>of</strong> the major crops. Planting time is one <strong>of</strong> the main factors that regulate the<br />

productivity <strong>of</strong> rice. Optimum planting time for a crop is location specific. Earliest planting<br />

<strong>of</strong> rice is preferable because <strong>of</strong> utilization <strong>of</strong> the entire growing season and thereby allowing<br />

greater pr<strong>of</strong>it margin. The most common method <strong>of</strong> planting rice in Jammu and Kashmir UT<br />

is through transplanting nursery which is more time consuming, laborious and is costly.<br />

Therefore, this method can be replaced by direct seeding. Direct seeding <strong>of</strong> rice is a method<br />

in which rice seeds are directly sown in the experimental field instead <strong>of</strong> transplanting<br />

seedlings from the nursery. In direct seeding <strong>of</strong> rice (DSR) rice was sown in unpuddled<br />

conditions in well pulverized soil which is the most reliable option to the farmers for efficient<br />

water saving and is cost and labour effective. Growth and development <strong>of</strong> crops are known to<br />

be influenced by multiple factors and amongst them selection <strong>of</strong> cultivars for a given set <strong>of</strong><br />

environments is one <strong>of</strong> the major aspects besides soil fertility, temperature regimes, solar<br />

radiations, irrigation etc. and play a very important role in exploiting good crop growth and<br />

development. Several varieties <strong>of</strong> different yield potentials, quality and <strong>of</strong> varying maturity<br />

groups <strong>of</strong> different crops developed and released on the basis <strong>of</strong> different agro climatic<br />

conditions are tested for cultivation to assess their performance under varied environmental<br />

situations (Banotra et al., 2021). In this study different planting dates and varieties <strong>of</strong> rice<br />

were studied to assess the growth and yield under irrigated subtropics <strong>of</strong> Jammu and Kashmir<br />

UT.<br />

Methodology<br />

The field experiment was conducted for consecutive three years from kharif 2018-2020 at<br />

Research field <strong>of</strong> Agrometerology section <strong>of</strong> Skuast-Jammu to evaluate the effect <strong>of</strong> different<br />

planting dates and varieties on growth and yield <strong>of</strong> rice (Oryza Sativa) in irrigated<br />

Subtropical conditions <strong>of</strong> J&K. The soil <strong>of</strong> the experimental field was sandy clay loam in<br />

texture, with low in organic C and available nitrogen but medium in available phosphorus<br />

and available potassium with pH 7.31. The experiment was conducted in randomized block<br />

design with three replications. The treatments comprised <strong>of</strong> three planting dates (1 st June, 16 th<br />

June and 1 st July) and three rice varieties ‘Pusa 1121’, ‘Basmati-370’ and ‘SRJ -129’. All the<br />

three varieties were sown by direct seeding on 1 st June, 16 th June and 1 st July during kharif<br />

Climate resilient agriculture for risk mitigation<br />

293 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

2018, kharif 2019 and kharif 2020. Rice varieties were sown at specified row to row distance<br />

<strong>of</strong> 20 cm and plant to plant distance <strong>of</strong> 10 cm. The plot size remains same 4.0 m ×3.6 m for<br />

all the three years. The recommended dose <strong>of</strong> nitrogen (45 kg/ha), phosphorus (30 kg/ha),<br />

potassium (15 kg/ha) were applied for variety ‘Pusa 1121’ where as for variety ‘Basmati-370’<br />

and ‘SRJ -129’ the recommended dose <strong>of</strong> nitrogen (30 kg/ha), phosphorus (20 kg/ha),<br />

potassium (10 kg/ha) in the form <strong>of</strong> Urea, Diammounium phosphate and murate <strong>of</strong> potash<br />

.Full dose <strong>of</strong> Phosphorus and potassium were applied as basal in all the treatments .Half dose<br />

<strong>of</strong> nitrogen was applied as basal dose at the time <strong>of</strong> sowing whereas remaining half nitrogen<br />

was applied in two equal splits at 45 DAS and panicle initiation stage . The plant height and<br />

yield attributes viz., no. <strong>of</strong> tillers/plant, no. <strong>of</strong> grains/panicle and 1000-grain weight (g), grain<br />

yield, straw yield and biological yield were calculated by using standard formula during three<br />

years. The data recorded for various characters were subjected to statistical analysis<br />

according to procedure outlined by Cochran and Cox (1963). All the comparisons were<br />

worked out at 5 per cent level <strong>of</strong> significance during three years.<br />

Results<br />

Result <strong>of</strong> pooled data <strong>of</strong> plant height (cm) <strong>of</strong> rice presented in Table 1 revealed that plant<br />

height at harvest <strong>of</strong> rice was significantly influenced by different sowing dates and different<br />

varieties <strong>of</strong> rice during all the three-growing season by direct seeding. Among the three<br />

planting dates, significantly highest plant height at harvest (136.45 cm) was recorded with<br />

(early sown) 1 st June sowing date whereas significantly lowest plant height at harvest was<br />

recorded with (late sown) 1 st July sowing dates. 16 th June (Mid sown) sowing date was found<br />

significantly different from 1 st June and 1 st July sowing date in plant height (126.91 cm)<br />

during all the three crop growing season. It was might be due to the reason that late sowing<br />

(1 st July) had shorter growing period due to photoperiodic response whereas (1 st June sowing<br />

date had longer growing season which produced taller plants and had lesser dry matter<br />

accumulation as compared to other planting dates. Similar, results were also reported by<br />

Bashir et al., (2010). Among the different rice varieties significantly highest pooled plant<br />

height <strong>of</strong> rice (158.48 cm) at harvest was recorded with variety ‘Basmati-370’ whereas<br />

significantly minimum plant height at harvest was recorded with variety ‘SRJ -129’ whereas<br />

variety ‘Pusa-1121’ was found significantly different from other two varieties in plant height.<br />

This was might be due to reason <strong>of</strong> different genotypes <strong>of</strong> rice varieties which may be<br />

responsible for the difference in growth characters. These results were in line with the<br />

findings <strong>of</strong> Thomas and Lal (2012). Grain yield is the function <strong>of</strong> integrated effect <strong>of</strong> all<br />

individual yield components and interaction between the genetic makeup and plant<br />

environment during the growing period (Banotra et al., 2021). Yield parameters viz. grain<br />

yield and straw yield <strong>of</strong> rice were significantly influenced by different planting dates and rice<br />

varieties. Among the different planting dates significantly highest grain yield (28.42 qha -1 )<br />

and straw yield (76.56 qha -1 ) <strong>of</strong> rice was recorded with 1 st June sowing date whereas<br />

294 | Page<br />

Climate resilient agriculture for risk mitigation


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

significantly lowest grain yield (21.82 qha -1 ) and straw yield (65.89 qha -1 ) <strong>of</strong> rice was<br />

recorded with 1 st July sowing date. Among the different rice varieties, significantly highest<br />

grain yield (29.72 qha -1 ) and lowest straw yield and <strong>of</strong> rice was recorded with variety ‘SRJ-<br />

129’ whereas significantly lowest grain yield (21.08 qha -1 ) and highest straw yield <strong>of</strong> rice<br />

were recorded with variety basmati-370. Variety Pusa-1121 was found significantly different<br />

from other two varieties in yield during three years.<br />

Effect <strong>of</strong> different planting dates and varieties on growth and yield <strong>of</strong> rice (Pooled data<br />

<strong>of</strong> 3 years)<br />

Treatments<br />

Plant height<br />

(cm)<br />

Direct seeding <strong>of</strong> rice / Date <strong>of</strong> Transplanting<br />

Grain Yield<br />

(q ha -1 )<br />

Straw Yield<br />

(qha -1 )<br />

D 1 - 1 st June 136.45 28.42 76.56<br />

D 2 - 16 June 126.91 25.13 71.89<br />

D 3 -1 st July 116.62 21.82 65.89<br />

CD (5%) 1.93 1.40 5.13<br />

Varieties<br />

V 1 - Pusa-1121 116.15 24.57 72.22<br />

V 2 -Basmati-370 158.48 21.08 80.63<br />

V 3 -SRJ-129 105.15 29.72 61.45<br />

CD (5%) 1.93 1.40 5.13<br />

Conclusion<br />

Based on three years study, rice variety when sown on SRJ-129 when sown on 1 st June can<br />

perform better than other planting dates and varieties in irrigated Subtropical conditions in<br />

Union Territory <strong>of</strong> J&K.<br />

References<br />

Bashir, M.S., Akbar, N., Iqbal, A. and Zaman, H. 2010. Effect <strong>of</strong> different sowing Dates on<br />

yield and yield components <strong>of</strong> direct seeded coarse rice (Oryza sativa). Pak. J. Agric. Sci.<br />

47(4), 361-365.<br />

Banotra, M., Sharma, B.C., Samanta, A., Gupta, L. and Kumar, R. 2021.Production and<br />

economics <strong>of</strong> irrigated transplanted basmati rice (Oryza sativa) as influenced by<br />

substitution <strong>of</strong> nutrients through organics in Jammu region <strong>of</strong> India. 66 (3): 295 -299.<br />

Cocharn, G. and Cox, G.M. 1963. Experimental design. Asia Publishing House, Bombay,<br />

India.<br />

Thomas, N., and Lal G ML. 2012. Genetic divergence in rice genotypes under irrigated<br />

conditions. Ann. Pl. and Soil Res. 14 (1): 109-112.<br />

Climate resilient agriculture for risk mitigation<br />

295 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

296 | Page<br />

T2a-25P-1369<br />

Effect <strong>of</strong> in-situ Moisture Conservation Measures and Stress Management Practices on<br />

Growth and Productivity <strong>of</strong> Rainfed Cotton<br />

A. Mohammed Ashraf * , T. Ragavan and S. Naziya Begam<br />

College <strong>of</strong> Agricultural Sciences, SRM Institute <strong>of</strong> Science and Technology, Vendhar Nagar,<br />

Baburayanpettai - 603201, Chengalpattu District, Tamil Nadu, India.<br />

*ashrafbsa09040@gmail.com<br />

The moisture stress during crop growth period is the primary cause for the yield reduction in<br />

cotton. To improve the soil moisture availability, by reducing the evaporation losses and<br />

retaining the moisture in effective rooting zone. The soil application <strong>of</strong> superabsorbent<br />

polymers (SAPs) is found to be the promising methodology in rainfed areas. However, very<br />

limited research work has experimented on this. One <strong>of</strong> such developed product is ‘PUSA<br />

hydrogel’ which is first successful an indigenous semi-synthetic superabsorbent technology<br />

for conserving water and enhancing crop productivity and thereby increases the water use<br />

efficiency (IARI, 2012). To reduce transpiration losses, foliar application <strong>of</strong> nutrient<br />

formulations, growth regulators, antitranspirants etc. <strong>of</strong> cotton are being tried by many<br />

researchers. Keeping all these fact in view, the present study was undertaken to study the<br />

influence <strong>of</strong> different land configuration measures and soil conditioners in moisture<br />

conservation along with stress management techniques in soil moisture retention, growth and<br />

yield performance <strong>of</strong> rainfed cotton.<br />

Methodology<br />

Field experiments were conducted at Regional Research Station, Aruppukottai, Tamil Nadu<br />

Agricultural University, Tamil Nadu during rabi season <strong>of</strong> 2016 and 2017 with the test<br />

variety SVPR-2. The soil <strong>of</strong> the experimental fields was medium deep, well drained vertisol<br />

(Type Chromusterts) in texture. The soil low in available nitrogen, low in available<br />

phosphorus and high available potassium. All package <strong>of</strong> practices were carried out as per<br />

recommendation <strong>of</strong> (CPG, 2012). The field experiment was laid out in split plot design with<br />

three replications. The main plots were allocated with three insitu moisture conservation<br />

measures. viz., Broad Bed and Furrows (BBF) (I 1), Ridges and Furrows (RF) (I 2) and<br />

Compartmental Bunding (CB) (I 3). The subplot comprised <strong>of</strong> stress management practices<br />

viz., Soil application <strong>of</strong> pusa hydrogel @ 5 kg ha -1 (S1), Soil application <strong>of</strong> pusa hydrogel @ 5<br />

kg ha -1 + foliar spray <strong>of</strong> 1% KCl (S 2), Soil application <strong>of</strong> pusa hydrogel @ 5 kg ha -1 + foliar<br />

spray <strong>of</strong> 5% kaolin (S 3), Soil application <strong>of</strong> pusa hydrogel @ 5 kg ha -1 + foliar spray <strong>of</strong><br />

PPFM @ 500 ml ha -1 (S4), Soil application <strong>of</strong> pusa hydrogel @ 5 kg ha -1 + foliar spray <strong>of</strong><br />

salicylic acid 100 ppm (S 5) and control (S 6). The yield attributing characters like number <strong>of</strong><br />

sympodia plant -1 , number <strong>of</strong> bolls plant -1 , boll weight and seed cotton yield were recorded.<br />

Further, rain water use efficiency, water use efficiency and soil moisture content at various<br />

Climate resilient agriculture for risk mitigation


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

depths and economics were also worked out and analyzed. The data obtained were subjected<br />

to statistical analysis and were tested at five percent level <strong>of</strong> significance to interpret the<br />

treatment differences as suggested by (Gomez et al., 1984). The data analysis for the<br />

probability occurrence <strong>of</strong> 30 years rainfall in a standard week showed that there is a<br />

possibility occurrence <strong>of</strong> getting more than 80 per cent <strong>of</strong> consecutive dry spell is laid with<br />

45 th and 50 th standard weeks. So, to avoid stress, foliar spray has given at 45 th and 50 th<br />

standard weeks for the years <strong>of</strong> study 2016 and 2017 based on historical rainfall probability<br />

analysis by Markov chain method to fix foliar spray application during the experimentation<br />

period.<br />

Results<br />

From the present study, it was also found that soil application PUSA hydrogel significantly<br />

improved soil moisture availability than control. Soil application <strong>of</strong> PUSA hydrogel @ 5 kg<br />

/ha recorded significantly higher soil moisture per cent at the depth <strong>of</strong> 0-15, 15-30 and 30-45<br />

cm. This might be due to the fact that the application <strong>of</strong> polymers buffer root zone with water<br />

by reducing the water loss from deep percolation and beneficial to the plant roots to grow and<br />

proliferate into soil pr<strong>of</strong>ile and helps for sustaining crop growth and development.<br />

Application <strong>of</strong> hydrogel improves water retention capacity <strong>of</strong> soils and available water<br />

supplies to the crop. Water absorption by hydrogel was rapid and highest which increased the<br />

moisture retention linearly. Hence, the polymer allows water to infiltrate into the soil beyond<br />

its point <strong>of</strong> application. More soil moisture was retained under soil application <strong>of</strong> PUSA<br />

hydrogel @ 5 kg /ha upto 60 DAS. After that soil moisture content was gradually decreasing,<br />

due to absorption <strong>of</strong> moisture by the crops from hydrogel polymer. The super-absorbent<br />

polymers (SAPs) have special properties because <strong>of</strong> their three-dimensional structure. They<br />

are cross-linked macromolecules with segments <strong>of</strong> hydrophilic groups that can absorb and<br />

retain liquids and the absorbed water and release it slowly. These stored water in the SAPs<br />

are released slowly as required by the crop to improve growth under limited water supply.<br />

Yield is contributed by different yield components and any influence made by extraneous<br />

factor, will alter the yield significantly. In the present study, increased seed cotton yield could<br />

be attributed to better crop growth and yield components due to consistent soil moisture<br />

availability due to combined influence <strong>of</strong> BBF, soil conditioner and foliar application <strong>of</strong><br />

PPFM. The broad bed furrow system significantly influenced the seed cotton yield as<br />

compared to other land configuration. BBF recorded significantly higher seed cotton yield <strong>of</strong><br />

1,246 (2016) and 1,590 kg /ha (2017) which was 23 per cent (2016) and 19 per cent (2017)<br />

higher as compared to compartmental bunding. Increment in seed cotton yield was due to<br />

more soil moisture availability at the root zone which favoured better crop growth. This<br />

coupled with higher stomatal conductance and transpiration rate resulted accumulation <strong>of</strong><br />

more dry matter and yield components and ultimately the seed cotton yield. Higher seed<br />

Climate resilient agriculture for risk mitigation<br />

297 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

cotton yield was realized with complementary alliance <strong>of</strong> insitu moisture conservation<br />

measures with stress management practices in the present study. Significant influence by<br />

stress management practices also recorded with soil application <strong>of</strong> PUSA hydrogel @ 5 kg<br />

/ha + foliar spray <strong>of</strong> PPFM @ 500 ml /ha, which registered higher seed cotton yield.<br />

Effect <strong>of</strong> insitu moisture conservation & stress management practices on sympodial<br />

plant -1 , boll weight (g boll -1 ), bolls plant -1 and seed cotton yield (kg ha -1 ) <strong>of</strong> rainfed cotton<br />

(Pooled data <strong>of</strong> rabi 2016 & rabi 2017)<br />

Treatments<br />

Sympodia<br />

Plant -1<br />

Insitu moisture conservation<br />

Boll<br />

weight<br />

(g boll -1 )<br />

Bolls<br />

Plant -<br />

1<br />

Seed cotton<br />

yield (kg ha -<br />

1<br />

)<br />

Broad bed and furrows 13.0 3.76 18.1 1,590<br />

Ridges and furrows 11.9 3.53 15.8 1,467<br />

Compartmental bunding 10.9 3.36 13.5 1,350<br />

S.Ed 0.2 0.10 0.6 32<br />

CD (P=0.05) 0.5 0.24 1.6 117<br />

Stress management practices<br />

Soil application <strong>of</strong> pusa hydrogel @ 5 kg ha -1 11.3 3.42 13.7 1,376<br />

Soil application <strong>of</strong> pusa hydrogel @ 5 kg ha -1 +<br />

foliar spray <strong>of</strong> 1% KCl<br />

Soil application <strong>of</strong> pusa hydrogel @ 5 kg ha -1 +<br />

foliar spray <strong>of</strong> 5% Kaolin<br />

12.4 3.71 19.0 1,580<br />

12.2 3.50 16.7 1,485<br />

Soil application <strong>of</strong> pusa hydrogel @ 5 kg ha -1 +<br />

foliar spray <strong>of</strong> PPFM @ 500 ml ha -1 13.2 3.85 20.8 1786<br />

Soil application <strong>of</strong> pusa hydrogel @ 5 kg ha -1 +<br />

foliar spray <strong>of</strong> Salicylic acid 100 ppm<br />

12.0 3.48 15.2 1,476<br />

Control 3.31 9.4 1,109<br />

S.Ed 0.3 0.11 0.6 48<br />

CD (P=0.05) 0.6 0.16 1.2 100<br />

Conclusion<br />

Broad bed and furrows combined with foliar application <strong>of</strong> PPFM spray at 500 ml ha -1<br />

resulted in significantly taller plants, higher dry matter production, LAI, yield attributing<br />

characters like number <strong>of</strong> sympodia plant -1 , number <strong>of</strong> bolls plant -1 , boll weight and seed<br />

cotton yield under rainfed areas. The higher values indicate that the moisture conservation<br />

and stress management practices improved growth rate performance leading to higher yield<br />

potential <strong>of</strong> rainfed cotton. Broad bed and furrows combined with soil application <strong>of</strong> pusa<br />

hydrogel @ 5 kg ha -1 + foliar spray <strong>of</strong> PPFM @ 500 ml ha -1 during the stress period was<br />

found to be the best agronomic management practice in order to enhance yield in cotton<br />

under rainfed vertisols.<br />

298 | Page<br />

Climate resilient agriculture for risk mitigation


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

References<br />

CPG. 2012. Crop Production Guide. Coimbatore, India: Tamil Nadu Agricultural University<br />

Gomez, K.A., Gomez, K.A. and Gomez, A.A. 1984. Statistical procedures for agricultural<br />

research: John Wiley & Sons.<br />

IARI. 2012. PUSA Hydrogel: An Indigenous semisynthetic superabsorbent technology for<br />

conserving water and enhancing crop productivity Indian Agricultural Research<br />

Institute, New Delhi, India.<br />

Sivapalan, S. 2001. Effect <strong>of</strong> a polymer on growth and yield <strong>of</strong> soybeans (Glycine max)<br />

grown in a coarse textured soil. Paper presented at the Irrigation 11-12 July, 2001<br />

Regional Conference, Toowoomba, Queensland, Australia.<br />

Yazdani, F., Allahdadi, I. and Akbari, G.A. 2007. Impact <strong>of</strong> superabsorbent polymer on yield<br />

and growth analysis <strong>of</strong> soybean (Glycine max L.) under drought stress condition. Pak. J.<br />

Bio. Sci. 10(23): 4190–4196.<br />

Enhancement in Different Cropping Systems Productivity and<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>iTability under Climate Resilient Agriculture (CRA)<br />

Reeta Singh, Sushil Kumar Singh, Illathur Rajesh Reedy, Rohit Jaiswal<br />

KVK Katihar-854 105, Bihar, India<br />

T2a-26P-1385<br />

The Katihar district is suitable for cultivation <strong>of</strong> jute, makhana, banana, potato, maize, rice,<br />

wheat, oil seeds and vegetables crops in different seasons <strong>of</strong> the year. The productivity<br />

enhancement <strong>of</strong> the field, fiber and horticultural crops with the concept <strong>of</strong> integrated farming<br />

system module is the major arena <strong>of</strong> thrust for development <strong>of</strong> agriculture in the district.<br />

Adopted Villages in Katihar under CRA Program in Korha block-Korha, is a town and tehsil,<br />

in the Katihar District, State-Bihar, India. As per 2011, census, the Korha block has 54527,<br />

households with literacy rate <strong>of</strong> 50%. All the adopted five villages fall on this NH-31<br />

highway that makes it more visible. The major source <strong>of</strong> living is agriculture,<br />

rice/jute/wheat/maize and makhana along with pulses are much cultivated in most <strong>of</strong> the<br />

areas.<br />

Methodology<br />

In Katihar, this program has been implemented in five villages (Musapur, Mahinathpur,<br />

Basgarha, Baharkhal and Sisiya) <strong>of</strong> Korha Block. Climate Resilient Agriculture Program has<br />

been implemented in all the aforesaid five villages <strong>of</strong> Korha block since rabi-2020, three<br />

cropping season has been completed and rabi 2021-22 in progress Since then, total four<br />

Climate resilient agriculture for risk mitigation<br />

299 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

cropping season has been covered as per Climate Resilient Agriculture Program (rabi-2021,<br />

summer- 2021, kharif-2021 & rabi- 2021-2022). In all the selected villages, cropping cycle<br />

has been covered as per crop calendar prepared as per Climate Resilient Agriculture Program<br />

with the help <strong>of</strong> new generation machineries such as zero tillage multi crop-planter, new<br />

turbo happy seeder, raised bed multi crop planter, drum seeder and rice wheat seeder for<br />

timely showing <strong>of</strong> crop, to control weeds and pests (tractor mounted sprayers) have been used<br />

for time saving and cost cutting.<br />

While for timely harvesting and post-harvest management (SMS based harvester, straw<br />

reaper as well as straw baller) is used for harvesting and effective residue management. In<br />

CRA programme, eight cropping systems (Rice-Wheat-Mung bean; Rice-Lentil-Mung bean;<br />

Maize-Wheat-Mung bean; Rice-Chickpea-Mung bean; Rice-Mustard-Mung bean; Pearl<br />

Millet-Wheat-Mung bean; Soybean-Wheat-Mung bean; and Rice-Maize) were demonstrated<br />

at farmers field as well at KVK farm <strong>of</strong> Katihar district relative to that <strong>of</strong> farmers practices<br />

systems are compared and analyzed across the project site.<br />

Results<br />

Results showed that highest productivity was recorded in Rice - Maize- Mung bean<br />

cropping system (160 ha -1 ) followed by Maize – Wheat – Mung bean (121 q ha -1 ), Rice –<br />

Wheat – Mung bean (94 q ha -1 ), Soybean – Wheat – Mung bean (68.5q ha -1 ),Rice – Mustard<br />

– Mung bean (67 q ha -1 ), Pearl Millet – Wheat – Mung bean (63.5 q ha -1 ), Rice – Lentil –<br />

Mung bean ( 63.3 q ha -1 ) and lowest was recoded with Rice – Chickpea – Mung bean ( 63 q<br />

ha -1 ) . However, in case <strong>of</strong> district average productivity for rice – wheat cropping system 56 q<br />

ha -1 , respectively. In case <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>itability, Results showed that highest pr<strong>of</strong>itability recorded<br />

in Rice - Maize- Mung bean cropping system (233800 Rs. ha -1 ) followed by Rice – Wheat –<br />

Mung bean (167100 Rs. ha -1 ), Soybean – Wheat – Mung bean (154650 Rs. ha -1 .), Maize –<br />

Wheat – Mung bean (152800 Rs. ha -1 ), Rice – Lentil – Mung bean (150260 Rs. ha -1 ), Rice –<br />

Chickpea – Mung bean (148700Rs. ha -1 ), Rice – Mustard – Mung bean (144600 Rs. ha -1 ),<br />

and lowest was recoded with Pearl Millet – Wheat – Mung bean (116700 Rs. ha -1 ). Rice -<br />

Maize- Mung bean cropping system with CRA intervention recorded highest productivity<br />

(160 ha -1 ) and pr<strong>of</strong>itability (233800 Rs. ha -1 ). Thus, we can say that CRA intervention is<br />

essential at present changing climate.<br />

300 | Page<br />

Climate resilient agriculture for risk mitigation


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

T2a-27P -1388<br />

Crop Water Requirement and Irrigation Water Management in Changing<br />

Climate for Sugarcane Crop in Baghpat District, U.P.<br />

Gaurav Sharma, Sandeep Chaudhary, Dev Kumar<br />

Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Baghpat, Uttar Pradesh, India, Pin code-250101<br />

Variability in the rainfall pattern over the decade due to human-indulged activities inculcated<br />

several miserable circumstances that have elevated the sequences <strong>of</strong> unpredictable<br />

consequences in terms <strong>of</strong> frequent occurrences <strong>of</strong> extreme weather events such as drought,<br />

storms, flood, heat waves, and increase in water and vector-borne disease issues. Changes in<br />

the climatic parameters viz., maximum and minimum temperature, rainfall, relative humidity,<br />

sunshine hours, wind speed, and the rate <strong>of</strong> evapotranspiration had causes severe implications<br />

in terms <strong>of</strong> inadequate water availability, decreased crop production and its yields. Therefore,<br />

for effectual crop production and to render the impacts and complications posed by climate<br />

variability and human-induced activities efficient irrigation water management is critical. The<br />

crop water requirement (CWR) and irrigation water management strategies had been<br />

formulated as an objective <strong>of</strong> this extended summary for the sugarcane crop for the Baghpat<br />

district, Uttar Pradesh which will helps in rendering the impediment put forwards. In the<br />

above context variability in the rainfall pattern has been evaluated based on seasonal and<br />

annual rainfall, number <strong>of</strong> rainy days, 1-day maximum rainfall whereas crop water<br />

requirement (CWR) and irrigation requirement (IR) has been evaluated using CROPWAT<br />

s<strong>of</strong>tware. The scenario based CWR and IR has been computed for normal year, drought year,<br />

flooded year and average year (35 years) which was evaluated based on departure analysis <strong>of</strong><br />

seasonal rainfall.<br />

Methodology<br />

For climate change detection the expert team on climate change detection indices (ETCCDI)<br />

were evaluated. Based on the indices rainy days are counted as days when daily precipitation<br />

was greater than 2.5mm and 1-day maximum rainfall was computed as the precipitation<br />

observed in a complete year. Crop water requirement is defined as the amount <strong>of</strong> water<br />

needed to compensate the evapotranspiration loss from the cropped field. The crop water<br />

requirement is computed as a multiple <strong>of</strong> crop coefficient value and reference<br />

evapotranspiration. FAO Penman–Monteith method (Abeysiriwardana et al., 2022) has been<br />

used for computing the reference evapotranspiration using CROPWAT s<strong>of</strong>tware (Surendran<br />

et al., 2015). India Meteorological Department (IMD) criterion was used to evaluate drought<br />

year as an area which receives a seasonal rainfall less than 75% <strong>of</strong> its normal (Appa Rao,<br />

1986). The daily gridded rainfall data <strong>of</strong> 35 years (1986-2020) had been used to carry out the<br />

analysis which was downloaded from Indian Meteorological department (IMD), Pune while<br />

Climate resilient agriculture for risk mitigation<br />

301 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

other climatic data was downloaded from NASA (https://power.larc.nasa.gov). Loamy<br />

textured soil is generally prevailing in the region (CGWB, 2014).<br />

Results<br />

Based on the assessment <strong>of</strong> rainfall data it is revealed that the annual rainfall in Baghpat<br />

district varies between minimum <strong>of</strong> 245 mm (1987) to maximum <strong>of</strong> 1488 mm (1997) with an<br />

average <strong>of</strong> 624 mm (1986-2020). The average number <strong>of</strong> rainy days varies between minimum<br />

<strong>of</strong> 24 days (1997) to maximum <strong>of</strong> 56 days (1996) with an average <strong>of</strong> 40 days. The average<br />

annual rainfall in Baghpat district showed a decreasing trend thus depicting quite a critical<br />

condition from the cropping pattern point <strong>of</strong> view. The 1-day maximum rainfall over the<br />

region showed a decreasing trend and the 1-d maximum rainfall varies between minimum <strong>of</strong><br />

27 mm (1987) to maximum <strong>of</strong> 273 mm (1994) with an average <strong>of</strong> 74 mm. The indicatorbased<br />

analysis unveils the ill-effects <strong>of</strong> climate change over the region which calls for<br />

adaptation <strong>of</strong> suitable approaches to cope and to render the impacts thus generated. Based on<br />

the departure analysis <strong>of</strong> annual rainfall the drought year (50%) had been identified. Year viz., 1987, 1997, and 2014 had been identified<br />

as drought year, 1999 as normal year and 1994 as flooded year. For depicting the average<br />

CWR and IR, the average <strong>of</strong> 35 years (1986-2020) has been used for comparison with the<br />

years identified based on departure analysis <strong>of</strong> annual rainfall.<br />

As per ICAR-SBI, Coimbatore, there are four crop growth phases in sugarcane crop viz.,<br />

germination phase (1-35 day), tillering phase (36-100 day), grand growth phase (101-270<br />

day), and maturity phase (271 up to harvest) which require irrigation water at the interval <strong>of</strong><br />

7, 10, 7 & 15-days intervals in different phased respectively with the irrigation frequency <strong>of</strong><br />

41. Therefore, the cumulative crop water requirement and irrigation water requirement as per<br />

the computation using CROPWAT s<strong>of</strong>tware for sugarcane crop was 2442 mm and 1965 mm<br />

respectively. The irrigation water requirement for drought, normal, flooded years is depicted<br />

in table 1 and Figure 2 showed the variability in the irrigation water requirement (mm/yr).<br />

Irrigation water requirement for sugarcane crop<br />

Year Irr. Req. (mm/yr)<br />

1987 (D*) 2232.9<br />

1997 (D) 2159<br />

2014 (D) 2084.8<br />

1999 (N) 2012.9<br />

1994(FL) 1953.2<br />

Average 1965.1<br />

Note: * D= drought year, N= normal year, FL= flooded year, average (1986-2020) year<br />

302 | Page<br />

Climate resilient agriculture for risk mitigation


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Crop water requirement for sugarcane<br />

Based on evaluation it was evidenced that the crop water requirement and irrigation<br />

requirement was maximum during the April to June period and is minimum during the winter<br />

season. The irrigation water requirement in the region varies between minimum <strong>of</strong> 1953 mm<br />

(flooded year) to maximum <strong>of</strong> 2232 mm (drought year). To cope with the changing<br />

environment and for efficient water management, irrigation intervals need to be subjugated as<br />

per the moisture content <strong>of</strong> the soil. Suitable irrigation and water carrying infrastructure need<br />

to be develop for efficient water management.<br />

Conclusion<br />

The changing environment put forwards unprecedented circumstances in terms <strong>of</strong> variability<br />

in the rainfall pattern and other meteorological parameter thus causes severe implication in<br />

terms <strong>of</strong> food security. Therefore, efficient and effective water management strategies need to<br />

be adopted especially in Baghpat district where water guzzling crop viz., sugarcane and rice<br />

are grown as major crop during kharif and wheat as Rabi crop. Cropping pattern need to be<br />

adopted as per the water availability in the region that will helps in rendering the impact <strong>of</strong><br />

such devastating condition put forth by the changing climate.<br />

References<br />

Bloom, S., Silva, A., Dee, D., Bosilovich, M., Chern, J. D., Pawson, S., Schubert, S.,<br />

Sienkiewicz, M., Stajner, I., Tan, W. W. and Wu, M. L. 2005. Documentation and<br />

Validation <strong>of</strong> the Goddard Earth Observing System (GEOS) Data Assimilation System<br />

- Version 4, Technical Report Series on Global Modeling and Data Assimilation,<br />

NASA/TM. 26:140-606.<br />

Appa, Rao. G. 1986. Drought climatology.Jal Vigyan Samiksha, Publication <strong>of</strong> high level<br />

technical committee on hydrology, National Institute <strong>of</strong> Hydrology, Roorkee.<br />

Climate resilient agriculture for risk mitigation<br />

303 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Abeysiriwardana, H. D., Muttil, N., and Rathnayake, U. 2022. A Comparative Study <strong>of</strong><br />

Potential Evapotranspiration Estimation by Three Methods with FAO Penman–Monteith<br />

Method across Sri Lanka. Hydrology. 9(11), 206.<br />

Surendran, U., Sushanth, C. M., Mammen, G., and Joseph, E. J. 2015. Modelling the crop<br />

water requirement using FAO-CROPWAT and assessment <strong>of</strong> water resources for<br />

sustainable water resource management: A case study in Palakkad district <strong>of</strong> humid<br />

tropical Kerala, India. Aquatic Procedia. 4:1211-1219.<br />

T2a-28P-1422<br />

Study <strong>of</strong> Moth Bean (Vigna aconitifolia) as a Multifaceted Climate Resilient Crop<br />

G. Gomadhi, P. Sridhar and M. Sathyasivananthamoorthy<br />

Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Villupuram, Tamil Nadu -604 002, India<br />

Pulses play a vital role in Indian Agriculture. India produces about 25 per cent <strong>of</strong> the world's<br />

pulses, but it eats 30 per cent <strong>of</strong> the world's pulses and buys 14 per cent <strong>of</strong> its pulses needs<br />

from other countries (Sanjay Kumar et al., 2022). India's pulse crop exhibits the productivity<br />

<strong>of</strong> 228 kg ha -1 (Choudhary et al., 2021) which are rich source <strong>of</strong> protein for a majority <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Indian population. Moth bean (Vigna aconitifolia) is the most drought and heat tolerant pulse<br />

crop in Tamil Nadu and is used as a source <strong>of</strong> food, fodder, green manuring and green<br />

pasture. Farmers usually cultivate this moth bean crop under rainfed condition especially<br />

during rabi season immediately after completion <strong>of</strong> northeast monsoon under used in<br />

utilizing residual moisture for germination and further growth fully dependent on residual<br />

moisture and dew. So, it is commonly called as Panipayaru (Pani is a Tamil name for dew) in<br />

Tamil Nadu. Farmers fetching low income from the crop due to cultivation <strong>of</strong> desi varieties<br />

which gave fewer yields. Hence, under NICRA Scheme a front-line demonstration (FLD)<br />

was conducted with high yielding moth bean variety TMV 1 with foliar application <strong>of</strong> TNAU<br />

crop booster (Pulse wonder) to increase the income <strong>of</strong> farmers. The following intervention<br />

was studied in the cropping system and moth been TMV 1seeds are distributed during 21<br />

farmers <strong>of</strong> Thaniyal village under National Innovation in Climate Resilient Agriculture<br />

(NICRA) in the farming system typology is rainfed with animal. The nutritional value <strong>of</strong> the<br />

crop was analyzed by Community Science College and Research Institute, Tamil Nadu<br />

Agricultural University, Madurai and its health benefits are given below.<br />

Nutrition in Moth Bean<br />

Component Nutritional value Health Benefits<br />

Carbohydrates 20.63 g Strong bones<br />

Dietary fiber 5.60 g Enhance immune system<br />

Total lipids (Fat) 0.53 g Reduce stress<br />

304 | Page<br />

Climate resilient agriculture for risk mitigation


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Copper 0.36 g Repairment <strong>of</strong> Muscles<br />

Iron 3.80 g Assist to reduce weight<br />

Zinc 1.64 g Bowel movement<br />

Methodology<br />

The demonstration <strong>of</strong> drought tolerant high yielding moth bean variety TMV 1 as a climate<br />

resilient technology under rainfed farming system typology was carried out by the scientists<br />

<strong>of</strong> Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Villupuram through NICRA scheme during rabi season <strong>of</strong> 2021 at<br />

Thaniyal village <strong>of</strong> Villupuram district in Tamil Nadu with the active participation <strong>of</strong><br />

farmers. The soil <strong>of</strong> the village is sandy loam in texture with a pH <strong>of</strong> 7.54, EC 0.64 dS m -1 ,<br />

low in organic carbon status (0.45%), available nitrogen and medium in phosphorus and<br />

potassium status. Sowing was taken were sown during the month <strong>of</strong> December with a seed<br />

rate <strong>of</strong> 8kg /acre. Each demonstration was conducted in an area <strong>of</strong> 0.4 ha and the same area<br />

adjacent to the demonstration plot was kept as farmer’s practices. The package <strong>of</strong> improved<br />

production technologies included improved variety (TMV 1) and foliar application <strong>of</strong> pulse<br />

wonder (TNAU crop booster) during flowering stage.<br />

Results<br />

Front-line demonstration <strong>of</strong> Moth bean TMV 1 conducted at NICRA village<br />

(2021-2022)<br />

Sl.<br />

No<br />

Name <strong>of</strong> the<br />

farmer<br />

Yield<br />

(Q ha -1 )<br />

Cost <strong>of</strong><br />

Cultivation<br />

(Rs. ha -1 )<br />

Gross Income<br />

(Rs. ha -1 )<br />

Net Income<br />

(Rs. ha -1 )<br />

B:C<br />

Ratio<br />

1 G. Mannakati 7.1 25550 45890 20340 1.8<br />

2 J. Subramiyan, 7.8 26000 50765 24765 2.0<br />

3 A. Selladurai 10.1 27000 65390 38390 2.4<br />

4 V. Perumal 11.6 27500 75140 47640 2.7<br />

5 D. Mohan 9.8 26550 63765 37215 2.4<br />

6 R. Anjalai 12.3 28790 80015 51225 2.8<br />

7 S. Munusami 12.1 28000 78390 50390 2.8<br />

8 G. Vijaya 9.1 26690 58890 32200 2.2<br />

9 K. Dhandapani 12.8 27980 83265 55285 3.0<br />

10 V. Munusami 11.6 28250 75140 46890 2.7<br />

11<br />

M.<br />

Madhialagan<br />

12.3 28700 80015 51315 2.8<br />

12 S. Valli 12.1 28880 78390 49510 2.7<br />

13 M. Sakkrapani 12.6 28790 81640 52850 2.8<br />

14 V. Dhandapani 11.8 27980 76765 48785 2.7<br />

15 A. Varathan 12.6 28990 81640 52650 2.8<br />

16 M. Jayaraman 12.3 28950 80015 51065 2.8<br />

17 N. Krishnan 11.6 28700 75140 46440 2.6<br />

Climate resilient agriculture for risk mitigation<br />

305 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

18 A. Murugan 11.3 27900 73515 45615 2.6<br />

19 C. Albert 11.1 28900 71890 42990 2.5<br />

20 C. Rajasekar 10.3 28800 67015 38215 2.3<br />

21 K. Umapathi 11.6 28400 75140 46740 2.6<br />

Average 11.1 27967 72277 44310 2.6<br />

Conclusion<br />

It was concluded that the yield <strong>of</strong> the Moth bean crop and net income <strong>of</strong> the Moth bean farmers<br />

were increased by the cultivation <strong>of</strong> TMV 1 variety <strong>of</strong> Moth bean along with integrated crop<br />

management practices under rainfed condition. To favor the climate change and dew fall, utilize<br />

crop without any irrigation. The farmers feel the subside <strong>of</strong> complex pest and diseases when<br />

compare to other pulse crops. The farmers were impressed with the performance <strong>of</strong> improved<br />

variety and crop booster which motivated other farmers to adopt the same at large scale and area<br />

extended up to 20 per cent.<br />

References<br />

Choudhary, H.R., Gopichand Singh. and Bhawana Sharma. 2021. Moth bean Cultivation under<br />

Rainfed Conditions <strong>of</strong> Nagaur District <strong>of</strong> Rajasthan. J. Krishi Vigyan. 9 (2): 143-146.<br />

Sanjay Kumar, Prashant Kaushik, Jasbir Singh and Verma, R.C. 2022. Increasing productivity<br />

and pr<strong>of</strong>itability <strong>of</strong> summer moong through frontline demonstration (FLD) in Kaithal<br />

district <strong>of</strong> Haryana. Pharma Innov. J. 11(7)(special): 14-17.<br />

306 | Page<br />

T2a-29P-1435<br />

Dissemination <strong>of</strong> Productivity Enhancement Technologies in Pigeonpea<br />

through Frontline Demonstrations<br />

Debesh Singh*, R.P.S. Tomar and Swati Tomar<br />

NICRA, RVSKVV, KVK, Morena 476001, M.P.<br />

*debeshtomar315@gmail.com<br />

The demonstration was conducted during kharif season 2017-18 and 2018-19 year under<br />

NICRA project at ATTA village, Block - Jaura, District- Morena (MP) where 26<br />

Demonstrations on pigeonpea crop were carried out an area <strong>of</strong> 10.40 ha by the active<br />

participation <strong>of</strong> farmers with the objective to demonstrate the improved technologies in<br />

pigeon pea to exploit production potential. The improved technologies consisted <strong>of</strong> use <strong>of</strong><br />

improved wilt resistant variety, seed treatment with Rhizobium culture, balanced fertilizer<br />

application and integrated pest management. Frontline demonstrations (FLDs) recorded high<br />

yield as compared to farmer’s local practice. The improved technology recorded higher yield<br />

<strong>of</strong> 22.10 q ha -1 compared to 17.20 q ha -1 in farmer’s local practice. In spite <strong>of</strong> increase in<br />

yield, technological gap, extension gap existed. The improved technologies gave higher gross<br />

return, net return higher benefit/cost ratio then farmer’s practices.<br />

Climate resilient agriculture for risk mitigation


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

T2a-30P-1468<br />

Demonstration <strong>of</strong> Fish Seed Rearing in Natural Water Bodies <strong>of</strong> Rainfed Agro-<br />

Ecosystem: A Case <strong>of</strong> a Farmer from Srikakulam, District <strong>of</strong> North Coastal Andhra<br />

Pradesh<br />

Ch. Balakrishna 1* , K. Bhagya Lakshmi 1 , A. Devivaraprasad Reddy 2 , D. Chinnam<br />

Naidu 3 , S. Neelaveni 1 , G. Naveen Kumar 1 , V. Harikumar 1 , B. Suneetha 1 , S. Kiran<br />

Kumar 1 , S. Anusha 1 , B. Mounika 1<br />

1 ICAR- Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Amadavalasa<br />

2 Dr. YSR Horticultural University, Venkataramannagudem, West Godavari District, Andhra<br />

Pradesh, India<br />

3 Agricultural college, Acharya N G Ranga Agricultural University, Naira, Srikakulam District,<br />

Andhra Pradesh, India<br />

* ch.balakrishna@angrau.ac.in<br />

India is endowed with inland freshwater resources, which contribute both livelihood and<br />

nutritional security to the rural community. These natural water bodies are biologically<br />

sensitive and threatened by an array <strong>of</strong> anthropogenic and climatic factors. Uncertainty in<br />

reception and availability <strong>of</strong> the water for fish culture causes inappropriate stocking <strong>of</strong> fish<br />

seed leading to poor fish production. Availability <strong>of</strong> quality fish seed at appropriate times is<br />

the major constraint for the development <strong>of</strong> aquaculture in these natural water bodies <strong>of</strong><br />

Andhra Pradesh. To address this issue, Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Amadalavalasa conducted a<br />

demonstration on captive nursery rearing <strong>of</strong> fish seed in Jagannathanaidu tank, <strong>of</strong> Srikakulam<br />

district <strong>of</strong> north coastal Andhra Pradesh, located at 18 0 48.037’ N, and 83 0 53.729’ E. Three<br />

to five-day-old spawn stage fish seeds <strong>of</strong> Indian Major Carps Catla (Catla catla), Rohu<br />

(Labeo rohita), and Mrigala (Cirrhinus mrigala) were released in a 27 m 3 water spread area<br />

<strong>of</strong> 6X3X1.5 m sized net cage at the rate <strong>of</strong> 1, 50,000 numbers. The culture <strong>of</strong> fish seed was<br />

carried out for 15 days up to the fry stage in net cages. It was observed 32.18 % <strong>of</strong> survival<br />

rate and produced 48270 numbers <strong>of</strong> fry. Through this activity, the farmer could save an<br />

amount <strong>of</strong> Rs.9394 on fish seed purchased from outside. This fry-stage fish seed was in turn<br />

reared in rearing ponds for 1-2 months until fingerling size to stock the grow-out culture tank<br />

immediately after reception <strong>of</strong> water. Based on the above results it is recommended that<br />

nursery rearing <strong>of</strong> fish seed is remunerative, reduces losses during transportation, and assures<br />

the quality <strong>of</strong> fish seed in the required quantity.<br />

Climate resilient agriculture for risk mitigation<br />

307 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

T2a-31P-1469<br />

Studies on the Effect <strong>of</strong> Rice Varieties on Flood Tolerant in Karaikal<br />

District<br />

V. Aravinth and S. Jayasankar<br />

Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Madur, Karaikal District – 609 607.<br />

Flooding is one <strong>of</strong> the most hazardous natural disasters and a major constraint to rice<br />

production throughout the world, which results in huge economic loss. Approximately onefourth<br />

<strong>of</strong> the global rice crops (approximately 40 million hectares) are grown in rainfed<br />

lowland plots that are prone to seasonal flooding. Karaikal District is also flood prone area<br />

and received average rainfall <strong>of</strong> 1200-1300 mm per year. Considering seasonal flooding due<br />

to monsoon rain a Front-Line Demonstration was conducted in Karaikal District during<br />

samba (2020-21 and 2021-22) by Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Madur, Karaikal District with three<br />

varieties <strong>of</strong> Rice varieties Viz., BPT 5204, VGD1 and ADT 54 raised in direct sown method<br />

to find their suitability under flooding condition. Apart from the varieties, seeds were treated<br />

with Bacillus subtilis 10 g per kg <strong>of</strong> seed, soil application <strong>of</strong> Azophos (1 kg per ha) bio<br />

fertilizer along with FYM and supply primary nutrient like NPK as recommended by TNAU<br />

(150:50:50 kg <strong>of</strong> NPK ha -1 ) as basal and topdressing. It was observed that, ADT 54<br />

exhibited higher plant height (165 cm), more number <strong>of</strong> tillers hill -1 (18 Nos.), more number<br />

<strong>of</strong> panicles per hill (13 Nos.), 1000 seed weight (16.3 g) and higher grain yield (5,220 Kg ha -<br />

1<br />

) as compared to BPT 5204 and VGD1. Gross and net returns were Rs. 1,01,032 and 43,548<br />

ha -1 , respectively in ADT 54 rice variety and BCR also high (2.32) as against other two<br />

varieties. Hence, to be safe and to avoid risk, ADT 54 variety is suitable for Karaikal district<br />

as direct sowing.<br />

T2a-32P-1478<br />

Crop Diversification at Agricultural Landscape Level for Climate Change<br />

Adaptation in Rainfed Agroecosystems<br />

G. Ravindra Chary*, V.K. Singh, M.S. Shirahatti, K.A. Gopinath, C.A. Rama Rao,<br />

B.M.K. Raju and K.V.Rao<br />

ICAR-Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, Hyderabad, Telangana 500059, India<br />

* rc.gajjala@icar.gov.in<br />

Rainfed agriculture is practiced in about 50 percent <strong>of</strong> net cropped area. It contributes 44% <strong>of</strong><br />

food grains and supports 40% and 75% human and livestock population respectively. Rainfed<br />

agriculture contributes immensely to country’s food production and economy. Climate<br />

change and climate variability impacts Indian agriculture in general and more pronounced on<br />

rainfed agriculture. Rainfall is likely to decline by 5 to 10% over southern parts <strong>of</strong> India<br />

308 | Page<br />

Climate resilient agriculture for risk mitigation


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

whereas10 to 20% increase is likely over other regions. There is a probable decrease in the<br />

number <strong>of</strong> rainy days over major part <strong>of</strong> the country pointing at likely increase <strong>of</strong> extreme<br />

events. With current gains in the existing rainfed production systems, there is need for more<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>itable land use systems. While evolving strategies for bridging yield gaps, due attention<br />

must be given to regional imbalances in terms <strong>of</strong> natural resources. For yield maximization,<br />

selecting genotypes with wide adaptability, cropping systems and crop diversification and<br />

resilience to climate variability remains a challenge. There is increasing urgency for a<br />

stronger focus on adapting agriculture to future climate change.<br />

Methodology<br />

The experiments on cropping systems were conducted both on-station and on-farm at<br />

network centres <strong>of</strong> All India Co-ordinated Research Project for Dryland Agriculture<br />

(AICRPDA). The results are briefly presented.<br />

Results<br />

Crop diversification in India is generally viewed as a shift from traditionally grown less<br />

remunerative crops to more remunerative crops. Higher pr<strong>of</strong>itability and also the<br />

resilience/stability in production urge for crop diversification, and large number <strong>of</strong> crops are<br />

practiced as intercrops in rainfed lands to reduce the risk factor <strong>of</strong> crop failures due to<br />

drought. Crop diversification is recognized as one <strong>of</strong> the most feasible, cost-effective, and<br />

rational ways <strong>of</strong> developing a resilient agricultural cropping system, particularly in rainfed<br />

agroecosystems. The various strategies for land use diversification for climate change<br />

adaptation (drought mitigation) in rainfed agroecosystems are briefed below.<br />

a. Resilient crops and varieties: Introduction <strong>of</strong> alternate crops and new cultivars <strong>of</strong> rainfed<br />

crops is a strategy aimed at enhancing productivity, and/or building crop resilience to weather<br />

risks, and environmental stresses at the backdrop <strong>of</strong> climate change/variability. It reduces the<br />

risk <strong>of</strong> total crop failure and also provides alternative means <strong>of</strong> generating income, as<br />

different crops will respond to climate scenarios in different ways. Higher yields can be<br />

attained by sowing the suitable crops at the right time and with the right land use conditions.<br />

Beyond the sowing window, choice <strong>of</strong> alternate crops or cultivars depends on the farming<br />

situation, soil, rainfall and cropping pattern in the location and extent <strong>of</strong> delay in the onset <strong>of</strong><br />

monsoon. The network centres <strong>of</strong> AICRPDA, over a period <strong>of</strong> research developed the<br />

following agro-ecology specific risk resilient alternate crops and intercropping systems to<br />

cope with delayed onset <strong>of</strong> monsoon for scaling out in various core rainfed agroclimatic<br />

zones.<br />

b. Alignment <strong>of</strong> agro-ecology specific resilient rainfed cropping systems : Crop<br />

diversification with intercropping systems enhances resource use efficiency, and overall<br />

system productivity and income per unit area to the small holders. Diversification with<br />

Climate resilient agriculture for risk mitigation<br />

309 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

intercropping systems contributes to in achieving food and nutritional security, income<br />

growth, employment generation and sustainable rainfed agriculture. Double cropping system<br />

aims to make optimum use <strong>of</strong> land through permitting the production <strong>of</strong> an extra crop<br />

cultivated in winter/rabi after kharif season. In general, the double cropping becomes<br />

feasible when there is on time onset <strong>of</strong> monsoon rains that helps to successfully establish the<br />

first crop, then persist for an extended period <strong>of</strong> time to allow the planting and maturation <strong>of</strong><br />

the second crop .To develop feasible and sustainable double cropping systems, production<br />

factors such as length <strong>of</strong> growing season, cropping sequence, crop compatibility, biological<br />

complementarity, and planting time must be considered (Ravindra Chary et.al. 2020; 2022).<br />

Agroclimate zone-wise, rainfed cereals, pulses, oilseeds and cotton-based production systems<br />

wise intercropping systems, double cropping systems are suggested.<br />

d. Building resilience at agricultural land scape level: Scientific land use planning in<br />

drought prone regions is one <strong>of</strong> the rational approaches for drought mitigation. Ravindra<br />

Chary et al. (2005) suggested that the delineation <strong>of</strong> Soil Conservation Units (SQUs), Soil<br />

Quality Units (SQUs) and Land Management Units (LMUs) from the detailed soil survey<br />

maps at cadastral level in a microwatershed would help in land resource management. SCUs<br />

and SQUs are merged in GIS environment to delineate land parcels in to homogenous Land<br />

Management Units with farm boundaries. LMUs would be operational zed at farm level for<br />

taking decisions on arable, non-arable and common lands for cropping, agr<strong>of</strong>orstry,<br />

agrohorticulture, etc., and further, for leaving the most fragile land parcels for ecorestoration.<br />

Rainfed land use planning modules should be based on these units for risk minimization,<br />

enhanced land productivity and income, finally for drought pro<strong>of</strong>ing.<br />

Conclusion<br />

Crop diversification action plans need to be developed and implemented in convergence with<br />

various national/state programmes.<br />

a. Crop diversification with alternate crops aligning with agroecology specificity<br />

including fodder and vegetable crops beyond normal sowing windows <strong>of</strong> the rainfed<br />

crops<br />

b. Scaling out Real-time contingency plans as two-pronged approach i.e. preparedness<br />

and real-time response<br />

References<br />

Ravindra Chary, G., Vittal, K.P.R., Ramakrishna, Y.S., Sankar, G.R.M., Arunachalam, M.,<br />

Srijaya, T. and Bhanu, U. 2005. Delineation <strong>of</strong> soil conservation units (SCUs), soil<br />

quality units (SQUs) and land management units (LMUs) for land resource appraisal and<br />

management in rainfed agro-ecosystem <strong>of</strong> India: A conceptual approach. Lead Paper.<br />

310 | Page<br />

Climate resilient agriculture for risk mitigation


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Proceedings <strong>of</strong> the National Seminar on Land Resources Appraisal and Management for<br />

Food Security, Indian Society <strong>of</strong> Soil Survey and Land Use Planning, NBSSLUP,<br />

Nagpur, India, 10-11 April 2005.<br />

Ravindra Chary, G., Gopinath, K.A., Bhaskar, S., Prabhakar, M., Chaudhari, S.K. and<br />

Narsimlu, B. 2020. Resilient Crops and Cropping systems to cope with Weather<br />

aberrations in Rainfed agriculture. AICRPDA. ICAR- CRIDA, Hyderabad-500 059.p.<br />

56.<br />

Ravindra Chary, G., Gopinath, K.A., Singh, V.K., Basant Kandpal, Bhaskar, S., Srinivasa<br />

Rao, Ch. And Chaudhari, S.K. 2022. Improved Agronomic Practices for Rainfed Crops<br />

in India. AICRPDA. ICAR- CRIDA, Hyderabad India. p.336.<br />

Climate resilient agriculture for risk mitigation<br />

T2a-33P-1508<br />

Demonstration <strong>of</strong> Climate Resilient Technologies for Mitigation in the<br />

North East<br />

M. Thoithoi Devi, Bagish Kumar, Olivina Katharpi and Rajesh Kumar<br />

ICAR-Agricultural Technology Application Research Institute, Zone-VI, Guwahati,<br />

Assam, India<br />

Climate change is not the corner stone <strong>of</strong> the natural aberration. It is very much obvious<br />

through abnormal weather conditions. This man-made calamity has negatively impacted<br />

every dimension <strong>of</strong> living. Agriculture <strong>of</strong> the entire country is not the exception from this and<br />

as far as north east region is concerned, due to its geographical position, it has affected it<br />

more. Considering the high vulnerability <strong>of</strong> the region, the ICAR has introduced the different<br />

climate resilient interventions in farmers’ field under Technology Demonstration Component<br />

(TDC) <strong>of</strong> NICRA in the state <strong>of</strong> Assam, Arunachal Pradesh & Sikkim. During 2018-19, in<br />

KVK Dhubri, Assam, an intervention on in-situ soil moisture conservation using straw mulch<br />

in Colocasia was introduced in farmers’ field. The main objective behind this intervention<br />

was to minimize the evaporation loss <strong>of</strong> water from soil and to supress weed growth. It was<br />

found that yield <strong>of</strong> local check was 43.51 q/ha whereas that <strong>of</strong> demonstration was 52.25 q/ha<br />

resulting in 20.09% increase in yield over local check. The other intervention undertaken by<br />

the same KVK was production <strong>of</strong> low cost vermicompost unit and reason behind the<br />

intervention was recycling <strong>of</strong> farm and household waste to convert them to nutrient rich<br />

vermicompost. From an unit <strong>of</strong> 6×3×2.5 cubic ft, net return <strong>of</strong> Rs. 4500.00 was obtained with<br />

B.C ratio <strong>of</strong> 2.5. In KVK Sonitpur, Assam, during 2018-19, paddy straw mulching in ginger<br />

variety Nadia was introduced in farmers’ field. During rabi season, rainfall was very less and<br />

low soil moisture affected the growth and development <strong>of</strong> winter crops. So this intervention<br />

was undertaken to conserve soil moisture as well as to suppress weed growth. Yield <strong>of</strong> local<br />

check and demonstration were 22 q/ha and 43 q/ha respectively. Increase in yield over local<br />

311 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

check was 95.45%. In Tirap, Arunachal Pradesh, the main climatic vulnerability was low soil<br />

moisture status and drought like situation during rabi season. So jalkund, water harvesting<br />

structure were constructed in farmers’ farm for giving supplemental irrigation to rabi crop<br />

namely potato (var. Kufri giridhari). The farmers were able to get an average yield <strong>of</strong> 150.6<br />

q/ha with B.C ratio <strong>of</strong> 2.29. Generally, the farmers <strong>of</strong> Tirap district did not apply any<br />

chemical fertilizers or organic nutrients in their field. So, fertility status or soil health <strong>of</strong> the<br />

district is decreasing year after year. Therefore, to maintain or enhance soil health, an<br />

intervention on preparation <strong>of</strong> vermicompost and its application in French bean (variety Pusa<br />

parvaty) was introduced in farmers’ field during 2018-19. It was observed that yield <strong>of</strong> local<br />

check was 29.2 q/ha whereas that <strong>of</strong> demonstration was 42.8 q/ha. Increase in yield over local<br />

check was 46.58% with B.C ratio 3.63. During 2019-20, in KVK Dhubri, Assam, low cost<br />

vermicomposting unit with raised bed was introduced in farmers’ field. Reason behind the<br />

intervention was to prevent the vermicomposting unit from flood. From a unit <strong>of</strong> 6×3×2.5<br />

cubic ft, net return <strong>of</strong> Rs. 6000.00 with B.C ratio <strong>of</strong> 2.57 was obtained. In KVK East Sikkim,<br />

Sikkim, no till cultivation <strong>of</strong> garden pea in rice fallow was introduced in farmers’ field with<br />

an aim to conserve soil moisture, save time and reduce cost <strong>of</strong> cultivation. Farmers were able<br />

to get an average yield <strong>of</strong> 57 q/ha with B.C ratio <strong>of</strong> 2.40. KVK East Sikkim also introduced<br />

bio mulching in ginger var. Bhaisey for reducing weed growth, moisture conservation and to<br />

get quality produce. Yield <strong>of</strong> local check obtained was 76.9 q/ha whereas yield <strong>of</strong><br />

demonstration was 125.9 q/ha.<br />

T2a-34P-1562<br />

Climate Smart Crop Diversification through Paddy-Pea Cropping System under Raised<br />

Beds in Lowland Rice Fallow<br />

Meghna Sarma, Mokidul Islam, and Elgiva Wanshnong<br />

Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Ri Bhoi, ICAR Research Complex for NEH Region, Umroi Road, Umiam-<br />

793103, Meghalaya, India<br />

Rice fallows occur due to the early withdrawal <strong>of</strong> monsoon rains leading to soil moisture<br />

stress at planting time <strong>of</strong> winter crops, water logging, and excessive moisture during<br />

November/December, lack <strong>of</strong> appropriate varieties <strong>of</strong> winter crops for late planting, and other<br />

socio-economic problems. In India, about 11.7 million hectares remain fallow after the<br />

harvest <strong>of</strong> rice, out <strong>of</strong> the 44.6 million ha <strong>of</strong> total rice area <strong>of</strong> the country. Approximately<br />

82% <strong>of</strong> the rice fallow lands are concentrated in the states <strong>of</strong> Eastern Uttar Pradesh, Bihar,<br />

Chhattisgarh, Jharkhand, Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, West Bengal, and North East India (Layek<br />

et al. 2014). Low productivity, crop diversification, employment, and income are the major<br />

constraints <strong>of</strong> existing production systems <strong>of</strong> the high-rainfall North-Eastern Hill Region <strong>of</strong><br />

India (Das et al. 2014). Crop diversification may enhance pr<strong>of</strong>itability, reduce pests, spread<br />

out labour more uniformly, and reduce risks from aberrant weather by different planting and<br />

312 | Page<br />

Climate resilient agriculture for risk mitigation


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

harvesting times and sources <strong>of</strong> high-value products from new crops (Reddy and Suresh,<br />

2009). The Kyrdem village in Ri-Bhoi district <strong>of</strong> Meghalaya under the subtropical hill agroclimatic<br />

zone is a climatically vulnerable area mostly affected by an acute scarcity <strong>of</strong> water<br />

during rabi season or excess water in the lowland rice ecosystem which leads to rice fallow.<br />

Farmers grow lowland local long-duration paddy from May to August which is ready to<br />

harvest in November- December and remain fallow due to excess water and late harvesting <strong>of</strong><br />

paddy leading to again low cropping intensity. Therefore, KVK Ri-Bhoidemonstrated climate<br />

resilient raised bed temporary land configuration technology with field pea variety Prakash<br />

under NICRA-TDC (Technology Demonstration Component) Project in rice–fallow area in<br />

the adopted village in order to enhance the cropping intensity, system productivity and<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>itability.<br />

Methodology<br />

The climate resilient technology <strong>of</strong> paddy (var. RCM 10) – pea (var. Prakash) cropping<br />

system under temporary land configuration using raised beds in low land rice fallow<br />

demonstrated at 95 farmers’ field covering 15 ha area at NICRA adopted Kyrdem village<br />

located at a latitude <strong>of</strong> 25° 41 ´487ʺ N and longitude92° 04ʹ 308ʺ E at an elevation <strong>of</strong> 864 m<br />

above MSL in Bhoirymbong block in Ri Bhoi district <strong>of</strong> Meghalaya during 2015-18 to<br />

increase the cropping intensity, system productivity, and pr<strong>of</strong>itability. The population in the<br />

village was 1760, with households 220 witha cultivated area <strong>of</strong> 600ha with major crops <strong>of</strong><br />

rice, maize, ginger, turmeric, and vegetables having only streams as the source <strong>of</strong> irrigation.<br />

The climatic vulnerability in the village was high intensity & erratic rainfall, hail storm, cold<br />

wave, frost, and terminal drought. Total Kharif (June -Sept) rainfall received during the<br />

paddy growing season was normal except during 2017 with an excess rainfall deviation <strong>of</strong><br />

25.3 percent. The paddy variety RCM 10 (125 days duration - June-Sept) was sown in the last<br />

week <strong>of</strong> May and transplanted in the first week <strong>of</strong> June. The climate resilient technology<br />

demonstrated to mitigate the soil moisture stress at planting time, water logging, and<br />

excessive moisture in November/December in rice fallow through raised beds <strong>of</strong> size 1m<br />

width and 0.3m height and 5-8 length and sunken spacing <strong>of</strong> 1: 0.5 ratios. The field pea (var.<br />

Prakash) was grown in raised beds in October/November after the harvest <strong>of</strong> paddy in<br />

sequence on raised beds. The soil <strong>of</strong> the demonstrated site was high organic carbon (0.83-<br />

1.15%), low to medium nitrogen (KMnO4– N 243-276 kg/ha) and phosphorus (12.43-14.78<br />

kg/ha Olsen P), medium in potash (189-205.43kg/ha NH4OAC-K) and acidic to slightly<br />

acidic in reaction (pH 4.15-5.58). The system productivity in terms <strong>of</strong> rice equivalent yield<br />

was calculated by converting crop yields into rice equivalent yield (REY) with the physical<br />

output <strong>of</strong> each crop and their price <strong>of</strong> output. Market prices prevailing during the crop season<br />

each year were used for computing maize equivalent yield.<br />

Climate resilient agriculture for risk mitigation<br />

313 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Results<br />

Results revealed that the average paddy yield was enhanced by 91.3 percent from 21.6 to<br />

41.32 q/ha and the seed yield <strong>of</strong> field pea was 11.54 q/ha. The system productivity <strong>of</strong> 52.86<br />

qREY /ha in the paddy-pea cropping system was recorded which might be due to the<br />

introduction <strong>of</strong> HYV <strong>of</strong> paddy and additional yield from field pea under raised beds in rice<br />

fallow. The enhancement <strong>of</strong> net return fetched from Rs.14, 830 to Rs.76476/ ha with a<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>itability ratio <strong>of</strong> 2.44 in the paddy-pea cropping system and increased the cropping<br />

intensity from 100 to 200 percent (Table 2). Islam et al. (2020) and Samant T.K. (2015) also<br />

reported that the inclusion <strong>of</strong> pulses in maize and rice-based crop sequences improved the<br />

system productivity, pr<strong>of</strong>itability, resource use efficiency, and cropping intensity from<br />

monocropping to double cropping.<br />

Performance <strong>of</strong> crop diversification on climate-resilient raised bed technology<br />

Parameters Paddy-fallow Paddy- field pea in<br />

raised beds<br />

Percent<br />

increased<br />

Paddy (var. RCM 10) (q/ha) 21.6 41.32 91.3<br />

Field Pea (var. Prakash) (q/ha) 0 11.54 100<br />

System Productivity(q/ha) 21.6 52.86 145<br />

Net return (Rs/ha) 14830 76476 416<br />

B:C ratio 1.85 2.44 32<br />

Cropping Intensity (%) 100 200 100<br />

Conclusion<br />

The pea planted on the raised beds escaped crop losses due to temporary water logging and<br />

<strong>of</strong>fers significant opportunities for intensification and diversification along with the<br />

utilization <strong>of</strong> paddy fields after harvesting to regenerate soil nutrients through leguminous pea<br />

plants. The successful demonstration <strong>of</strong> climate resilient paddy –pea cropping system in<br />

raised beds was realized by following the principles <strong>of</strong> “learning by doing” and “seeing is<br />

believing” which helped the farmers to grow peas successfully after Kharif paddy instead <strong>of</strong><br />

keeping the rice field fallow during rabi season. The impressive performance <strong>of</strong> the<br />

technology awakened the farmers, farm women, and rural youths <strong>of</strong> the village as well as<br />

neighbouring villages to adopt this resilient technology for the second crop after paddy as it<br />

helps to increase the cropping intensity, fetched higher net income and also better<br />

reconciliation under the climatic stress condition. It was concluded that the existing ricebased<br />

cropping system can effectively be diversified with the inclusion <strong>of</strong> legumes to<br />

diversify rice-based mono-cropping into rice-field pea/pulses cropping system which had<br />

nutrient cycling advantages. Hence, the climate-smart crop diversification in rice fallow<br />

under raised beds enhanced system productivity, pr<strong>of</strong>itability, and cropping intensity<br />

spreading to six neighboring villages covering 125 ha area in Ri Bhoi district <strong>of</strong> Meghalaya.<br />

314 | Page<br />

Climate resilient agriculture for risk mitigation


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

References<br />

Das, A., Patel, D.P., Ramkrushna, G.I., Munda, G.C., Ngachan, S.V., Buragohain, J., Kumar<br />

M. and Naropongla 2014. Crop diversification, crop and energy productivity under<br />

raised and sunken beds: results from a seven-year study in a high rainfall organic<br />

production system. Biol Agri. Horti, 30 (2): 73-87.<br />

Islam, M., Nath, L.K. and Samajdar, T. 2020. Sustainable diversification <strong>of</strong> maize (Zea mays<br />

L.) based cropping systems for productivity, pr<strong>of</strong>itability and resource-use efficiency<br />

in West Garo Hills <strong>of</strong> Meghalaya, India. Legume Res. 43(3): 427-431.<br />

Layek, J., Chowdhury, S., Ramkrushna, G.I, and Das, A. 2014. Evaluation <strong>of</strong> different lentil<br />

cultivars in lowland rice fallow under no-till system for Enhancing Cropping Intensity<br />

and Productivity. Indian J. Hill Farming 27(2):4-9.<br />

Reddy, B.N. and Suresh, G. 2009. Crop diversification with oilseed crops for maximizing<br />

productivity, pr<strong>of</strong>itability and resource conservation. Ind. J. Agron. 54(2): 206-214.<br />

Samant, T.K. 2015. System productivity, pr<strong>of</strong>itability, sustainability and soil health as<br />

influenced by rice-based cropping systems under mid central table land zone <strong>of</strong><br />

odisha. Int. J. Agric. Sci. 7(11):746-749.<br />

T2a-35P-1568<br />

Impact <strong>of</strong> Climatic Variability on Wheat Varieties in NICRA Villages <strong>of</strong><br />

Kullu District <strong>of</strong> Himachal Pradesh<br />

Subhash Kumar*, K. C. Sharma, R. K. Rana, Chandertkanta Vats, Ramesh Lal, Pooja<br />

Kumari and Surender Bansal<br />

Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Bajaura Distt. Kullu (H.P.), CSK Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya,<br />

Palampur-175 125, India<br />

*subhashsoils@gmail.com<br />

The performance <strong>of</strong> wheat is heavily influenced by a variety <strong>of</strong> environmental factors and the<br />

most important <strong>of</strong> which is rainfall, which has a significant impact on its growth and<br />

development. The occurrence <strong>of</strong> erratic rainfalls, with a delay in the arrival <strong>of</strong> rains during<br />

the growing season, is among one the factors affecting the crop's performance and yields.<br />

Water stress causes morphological and biochemical changes in plants, which eventually lead<br />

to functional impairment and the loss <strong>of</strong> plant parts (Naeem et al., 2015). The large threat <strong>of</strong><br />

climate change upcoming on agriculture, emphasizes conserving resources for sustained<br />

production which may be environmentally friendly. Development and dissemination <strong>of</strong><br />

short-duration varieties, which can withstand the climatic irregularities predictable in the<br />

future, should be given priority in the mountain region (Hussain and Mudasser, 2007).<br />

Climate resilient agriculture for risk mitigation<br />

315 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Keeping in view the conditions above, Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Kullu at Bajaura (HP)<br />

demonstrated the short-duration and drought-resistant varieties intending to mitigate the<br />

impact <strong>of</strong> climatic aberrations.<br />

Methodology<br />

Krishi Vigyan Kendra Kullu laid 362 No. <strong>of</strong> frontline demonstrations (FLDs) on wheat in the<br />

NICRA villages viz. Choyal and Gadouri. These villages are located at 31°50’40” to 57°0’0”<br />

N latitude and 77° 05’20” to 77°10’40” E longitude at an elevation <strong>of</strong> 1,100-1,234 m a.m.s.l.<br />

The study involved the incorporation <strong>of</strong> the complete Improved Package (IP) which includes<br />

short duration and drought-resistant recommended varieties <strong>of</strong> the CSKHPKV Palampur,<br />

recommended fertilizer, and pesticide in comparison to the farmer's practice (FP). These<br />

varieties were tested in the rainfed conditions that prevailed in these villages. Based on data<br />

collected from the FLDs, the results were compiled and inferences were drawn.<br />

Results<br />

The data reflects that with the adoption <strong>of</strong> an improved package (IP) on wheat, the grain yield<br />

was invariably higher (2910 to 3650 kg ha -1 ) over the farmer's practice (FP) that ranges from<br />

2420 to 2840 kg ha -1 from 2015-16 to 2018-19 (Table 1) which may be ascribed to the<br />

adoption <strong>of</strong> recommended agro-technologies during the study period. With the adoption <strong>of</strong> IP<br />

in wheat, the yield levels could be raised by 15.61 to 28.93 % over the FP. The technology<br />

gap recorded ranges from 350 to 1240 kg ha -1 during the years <strong>of</strong> investigation. The highest<br />

technological gap was obtained during rabi 2018-19 in the variety HPW-349 (1240 kg ha -1 )<br />

followed by 1090 kg ha -1 during rabi 2015-16 while the lowest gap was observed during rabi<br />

2018-19 (350 kg ha -1 ). This may be attributed to the lack <strong>of</strong> irrigation facilities and improper<br />

distribution <strong>of</strong> rainfall (Kumar et. al. 2015). The Extension gap ranges from 420 to 810 kg ha -<br />

1<br />

with the maximum during 2018-19 (810 kg ha -1 ) which indicates that there is a strong need<br />

to be aware and motivate the farmers to minimize the extension gap. The technology index<br />

indicates the feasibility <strong>of</strong> the evolved technology in the farmers’ fields under existing agroclimatic<br />

variations which varies from 9.59 to 41.89 %. Lower the value <strong>of</strong> the technology<br />

index and higher the feasibility <strong>of</strong> improved technology (Choudary, 2013).<br />

Yield <strong>of</strong> wheat affected by rainfall and improved practices over farmer's practice<br />

Year Variety Yield (kg/ha) Increase<br />

(%)<br />

2015-16 HPW-<br />

349<br />

HPW-<br />

236<br />

Technology<br />

Gap<br />

(kg ha -1 )<br />

Extension<br />

Gap<br />

(kg ha -1 )<br />

Technology<br />

index<br />

(%)<br />

WUE<br />

(kg ha -1 mm -1 )<br />

IP FP IP FP<br />

3120 2420 28.93 1080 700 34.62 7.38 5.72<br />

2910 2420 20.25 1090 490 37.46 6.88 5.72<br />

2016-17 HPW 3230 2690 20.07 970 540 30.03 7.67 6.39<br />

316 | Page<br />

Climate resilient agriculture for risk mitigation


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

349<br />

HPW<br />

155<br />

HPW<br />

368<br />

2017-18 HPW<br />

349<br />

HPW<br />

368<br />

2018-19 HPW<br />

368<br />

3110 2690 15.61 890 420 28.62 7.39 6.39<br />

3340 2690 24.16 660 650 19.76 7.94 6.39<br />

2960 2540 16.54 1240 420 41.89 14.14 12.13<br />

3100 2540 22.05 900 560 29.03 14.80 12.13<br />

3650 2840 28.52 350 810 9.59 7.22 5.62<br />

Average 3177.50 2603.75 22.02 897.50 574 28.88 9.18 7.56<br />

The total seasonal water use during the crop growth period in wheat varied from 209.4 to<br />

505.5mm (Fig 1) from 2015-16 to 2018-19. Water use efficiency (WUE) varied from 6.88 to<br />

14.80 kg ha -1 mm -1 in the IP and 5.62 to 12.13 kg ha -1 mm -1 in FP (Table 1). IP has greatly<br />

improved the yields that enhanced the WUE <strong>of</strong> wheat as compared to FP plots, though the<br />

crop water use was the same under both conditions (Dhakal, 2021).<br />

Seasonal water use from 2015-16 to 2018-19 in NICRA village<br />

The harvest index was recorded in the range <strong>of</strong> 60.78 to 62.26 % with the highest recorded<br />

during 2018-19. The application <strong>of</strong> the IP also improved the additional net returns over the<br />

FP which was observed in the range <strong>of</strong> Rs. 3420/- to Rs. 8250/-. The IBCR was obtained in<br />

the range <strong>of</strong> 1.19 to 2.70 from 2015-16 to 2018-19 with IP over the FP.<br />

Conclusion<br />

IP enhanced the yields and water use efficiency <strong>of</strong> wheat as compared to FP. The locationspecific<br />

crop management is required to bridge the technological gap. Awareness and<br />

motivation among farmers to adoption <strong>of</strong> improved agricultural production technologies will<br />

result in better yields which will enhance the WUE in wheat with the same amount <strong>of</strong><br />

seasonal water use in both IP and FP. IP can also greatly improve the livelihood and<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>itability <strong>of</strong> the farming community <strong>of</strong> the NICRA villages <strong>of</strong> Kullu district.<br />

Climate resilient agriculture for risk mitigation<br />

317 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

References<br />

Choudhary, A.K. 2013. Technological and extension yield gaps in oilseeds in Mandi district<br />

<strong>of</strong> Himachal Pradesh. Ind. J. Soil conserve. 41(1): 88-97.<br />

Dhakal, A. 2021. Effect <strong>of</strong> drought stress and management in wheat – A Review. Food and<br />

Agribus. Manag. (FABM). 2(2): 62-66.<br />

Hussain, S.S. and Mudasser, M. 2007. Prospects for wheat production under changing<br />

climate in mountain areas <strong>of</strong> Pakistan – An econometric analysis. Agric. Sys. 94(2):<br />

494– 501.<br />

Kumar, S., Choubey, A.K. and Singh, R. 2015. Analysis <strong>of</strong> yield gaps in black gram (Vigna<br />

mungo) in district Bilaspur <strong>of</strong> Himachal Pradesh. Him. J. Agric. Res. 41(1): 49-54<br />

Naeem, M., Ahmad, M., Kamran, M., Shah, M. and Iqbal, M. 2015. Physiological Responses<br />

<strong>of</strong> Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) to Drought Stress. Int. J. Pl. Soil Sci. 6 (1): 1–9.<br />

T2a-36P-1571<br />

Performance <strong>of</strong> Climate Resilient Technology Demonstrations in Kullu<br />

District <strong>of</strong> Himachal Pradesh<br />

R K Rana*, Pooja Kumari, K C Sharma, Chanderkanta Vats Subhash Kumar, Ramesh<br />

Lal & Surender Bansal<br />

CSK Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya,<br />

Krishi Vigyan Kendra Kullu HP 175125<br />

*drrameshrana70@gmail.com/ ranark@hillagric.ac.in<br />

Climate change trends and projections are on a global agenda. To reduce the ill effect <strong>of</strong><br />

climate change, climate resilient agriculture is a sustainable approach for converting and<br />

reorienting agricultural systems through different adaptation and mitigation mechanisms<br />

(Debangshi 2021). Agriculture is extremely vulnerable to climate change and has shown its<br />

sensitivity to variations in different threats like temperature, precipitation, and incidence <strong>of</strong><br />

natural events such as droughts which have impacted farm incomes. The Natural Resource<br />

Management (NRM) module <strong>of</strong> the National Network Project <strong>of</strong> ICAR- National Innovations<br />

on Climate Resilient Agriculture (NICRA) focuses to enhance the resilience <strong>of</strong> agriculture to<br />

climate change and climate vulnerability. The Technology Demonstration Component (TDC)<br />

<strong>of</strong> NICRA <strong>of</strong>fers a great opportunity to work with farmers and apply such technologies under<br />

field conditions to address current climate variability. The objective was to demonstrate sitespecific<br />

technology interventions on farmer’s fields for coping with climate variability in the<br />

district<br />

318 | Page<br />

Climate resilient agriculture for risk mitigation


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Methodology<br />

To address the climate vulnerabilities <strong>of</strong> the district, KVK Kullu selected one representative<br />

village for project implementation. Chhoel Gadauri village <strong>of</strong> Kullu block <strong>of</strong> the district<br />

Kullu was identified for technology demonstration under NICRA project based on the impact<br />

<strong>of</strong> climate change on agriculture in the village. A baseline was established, constraints were<br />

flagged and an action plan was prepared in consultation with the farmers and the innovative<br />

village climate risk management committee (VCRMC) created in the project to enable<br />

participatory decision-making and empowerment. Climatic variability in terms <strong>of</strong> historical<br />

rainfall trends over the last few decades was worked out which indicates that dry spells <strong>of</strong> 10-<br />

20 days are increasing particularly during Kharif season. Erratic rainfall, drought, and an<br />

increase in the temperature were the main constraints in the village. Therefore, to mitigate the<br />

drought to some extent, KVK decided to implement rainwater harvesting for life-saving<br />

irrigation. Water from perennial sources was brought from about 1.0 km through the span. A<br />

series <strong>of</strong> interlinked water storage tanks were constructed in the village which was later upscaled<br />

with the help <strong>of</strong> developmental departments. Warmer winter in lower elevations has<br />

resulted in the shifting <strong>of</strong> apples to higher elevations (Rana et. al. 2016). To counter the<br />

effect <strong>of</strong> climate change, farmers were motivated to plant pomegranates, which requires a hot<br />

and dry climate and are suitable for the changing climate in lower areas <strong>of</strong> the district. The<br />

demonstration on pomegranate cultivation in 15 ha area was conducted in the farmer’s field.<br />

Based on percent deviation in rainfall during the Kharif season the year 2014, 2016, and 2020<br />

were cited as stress years. The data on yield and net returns were averaged for three<br />

consecutive years.<br />

Results<br />

The major interventions under site-specific rainwater harvesting strategies were the<br />

construction <strong>of</strong> water storage tanks for water harvesting and to utilization <strong>of</strong> harvested water<br />

efficiently during the dry spell and critical stages <strong>of</strong> growth in rainfed areas. To reduce the<br />

effect <strong>of</strong> drought, a water storage capacity <strong>of</strong> 20.5 lakhs liter was created by constructing 65<br />

water storage tanks since the inception <strong>of</strong> the NICRA project with the help <strong>of</strong> developmental<br />

departments. The harvested water was utilized for supplementary lifesaving irrigations at<br />

critical stages <strong>of</strong> the crop during dry spells. Demonstrations on diversification towards highvalue<br />

cash crop tomato in Kharif, garlic in rabi season were conducted against cropping<br />

sequence <strong>of</strong> maize- wheat in the rainfed area. In tomato crops 4-5 life-saving irrigations were<br />

given through water-carrying pipes. During the Rabi season in garlic 3-4 numbers <strong>of</strong><br />

lifesaving, irrigations were given through the sprinkler method. The performance during<br />

stress and a normal year <strong>of</strong> rainfall was quite high as compared to the farmer's practice in the<br />

rainfed areas. The average net return for three years (Table 1) was recorded at Rs 3.39<br />

lakhs/ha from tomato and Rs 23993/ha from maize during the Kharif season in the stress<br />

Climate resilient agriculture for risk mitigation<br />

319 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

year. However, during the normal years <strong>of</strong> rainfall, the net income <strong>of</strong> Rs 4.16 lakhs/ha from<br />

tomatoes in rainfed areas and Rs 27605/ha from maize were obtained. Intervention in<br />

supplementary irrigation during the critical stages helped in maintaining the yield during<br />

stressful years. Reduction in yield was only 2.5 % and 4.8% in tomato and maize respectively<br />

during the stress year when compared to the normal year <strong>of</strong> rainfall.<br />

Similarly, in the rabi season, the performance <strong>of</strong> Garlic and wheat during the stress and<br />

normal years <strong>of</strong> rainfall were compiled. The net returns from garlic were compared with the<br />

net income from the wheat during rabi season. It was observed that a net return <strong>of</strong> Rs 2.15<br />

lakhs/ha from garlic and only Rs 49868 /ha from the wheat during rabi season in stress year.<br />

However, in normal years <strong>of</strong> rainfall, the net returns were observed to the tune <strong>of</strong> Rs 2.67<br />

lakhs/ha from garlic and only Rs 52316 /ha from wheat in the rabi season in the normal year<br />

<strong>of</strong> rainfall. The yield reduction was observed at 1.75% and 3% in garlic and wheat<br />

respectively when compared to the normal year <strong>of</strong> rainfall. No irrigation was given in maize<br />

and wheat.<br />

Effect <strong>of</strong> technology demonstration on yield and net income <strong>of</strong> farmers during stress<br />

and normal year <strong>of</strong> rainfall.<br />

Stress/<br />

normal year<br />

Kharif season<br />

Performance<br />

during stress<br />

years<br />

Performance<br />

during<br />

normal years<br />

Rabi Season<br />

Performance<br />

during stress<br />

years<br />

Performance<br />

during<br />

normal years<br />

Intervention<br />

Tomato + Lifesaving<br />

irrigation<br />

Maize- farmer<br />

practice<br />

Tomato + Lifesaving<br />

irrigation<br />

Maize- farmer<br />

practice<br />

Garlic<br />

GHC-1+ life saving<br />

irrigation<br />

Wheat<br />

HPW-368 -farmer<br />

practice<br />

Garlic<br />

GHC-1+ lifesaving<br />

irrigation<br />

Wheat<br />

HPW-368 farmer<br />

practice<br />

Area<br />

(ha)<br />

No. <strong>of</strong><br />

farmers<br />

Avg.<br />

Yield<br />

(q/ha)<br />

Avg.<br />

Fodder<br />

yield<br />

(q/ha)<br />

Gross<br />

returns<br />

(Rs/ha)<br />

Net<br />

returns<br />

(Rs/ha)<br />

B:C<br />

ratio<br />

4.73 27 345.20 - 440633 339301 4.38<br />

28.22 33.08 46350 23993 2.07<br />

4.70 21 354.08 - 531120 416120 4.61<br />

29.65 37.65 50649 27605 2.17<br />

6.4 46 112.85 - 300333 215306 3.52<br />

30.90 37.08 77868 49868 2.78<br />

5.54 43 114.25 - 350875 267535 4.26<br />

31.87 38.25 80316 52316 2.86<br />

320 | Page<br />

Climate resilient agriculture for risk mitigation


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Intervention in pomegranate cultivation was initiated during 2012-13 in the NICRA village as<br />

an alternate cash crop to apple. In the NICRA village, the area under pomegranate was only 5<br />

ha before the start <strong>of</strong> the project as per the baseline survey conducted by the KVK which has<br />

increased to 50 ha in ten years <strong>of</strong> implementation <strong>of</strong> the project. The pomegranate cultivar<br />

Kandhari Kabuli planted during 2012-13 started bearing in the third year <strong>of</strong> plantation.<br />

Conclusion<br />

It may be concluded that that intervention on water harvesting has opened up the opportunity<br />

for cultivating cash crops in rainfed area <strong>of</strong> the village by providing lifesaving irrigation<br />

during dry spells. The income <strong>of</strong> the farmers has been increased to many fold by adopting<br />

cash crops in comparison to cereal based farming. Similarly, intervention on pomegranate<br />

cultivation in the NICRA village has proven highly pr<strong>of</strong>itable.<br />

References<br />

Debangshi, U. 2021. Climate Resilient Agriculture an Approach to Reduce the Ill-Effect <strong>of</strong><br />

Climate Change. Int. J. Recent Adv. Multidisciplinary Topics. 2(7) -309-315.<br />

Rana, R. K., Thakur, S.K., Sharma, K.C., Vats, Chaderkanta, Lal, R., Kapoor, D., Kirna Devi<br />

and Sharma, Deepak. 2016. Impact, adaptation and mitigation <strong>of</strong> climate change on<br />

horticulture in foot hill areas <strong>of</strong> district Kullu (HP). In: Souvenir cum Invited Paper<br />

Abstract <strong>Book</strong>, 7 th Indian Horticulture Congress- An International Meet for Doubling<br />

Farmers Income through Horticulture, ICAR, P-301.<br />

Studies on Effect <strong>of</strong> Weather on Flowering and Yield <strong>of</strong> Mango<br />

T2a-37P-1576<br />

A. P. Mallikarjuna Gowda, R. Krupashree, H. S. Shivaramu, M. N. Thimmegowda,<br />

M. H. Manjunatha and Lingaraj Huggi<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Agricultural Sciences, GKVK, Bangalore-560065<br />

Any crop in a locality will grow and yield more under favourable climate and weather. While<br />

a crop or variety's suitability for a location is determined by the climate, its performance in<br />

that area is determined by the weather. Emphasizing the impact <strong>of</strong> short-term weather<br />

fluctuation on crop performance. For instance, changes in air temperature and rainfall affect<br />

several horticultural crops. Mango is growing well in areas receiving annual rainfall <strong>of</strong> 25 to<br />

250 cm. High humidity, rainfall and frost during the flowering period are harmful to the crop.<br />

Rainfall during flowering adversely affects fruit set, fruit development and yield. Excessive<br />

vegetative growth and flower drop occur due to heavy and prolonged rainfall. Fruits develop<br />

better colour and are less affected by diseases where the air is comparatively dry during<br />

flowering. Time and peak period <strong>of</strong> flowering, sex ratio, flowering behaviour, insect pests,<br />

Climate resilient agriculture for risk mitigation<br />

321 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

diseases and weather parameters like temperature and relative humidity influence flowering<br />

and fruit set in mango. Hence a study was conducted to establish a relationship <strong>of</strong> weather<br />

parameters with the flowering behaviour and yield <strong>of</strong> mango using per cent hermaphrodite<br />

flowers, fruit set (%) and fruit yield <strong>of</strong> mango.<br />

Methodology<br />

The present investigation was executed at 2 locations/orchards with two management levels<br />

(M1: control and M2: With Plant Protection Chemicals) with a sample size <strong>of</strong> 5 plants each in<br />

2 locations with different age groups (20 and 28 years old plantation) located at Dryland<br />

Agriculture Project, Zonal Agricultural research station, UAS, GKVK, Bengaluru analysed<br />

using factorial RCBD for two years (2020-21 and 2021-22). To manage the major diseases<br />

and pests like powdery mildew, anthracnose, fruit fly and mango hoppers two sprays were<br />

given to the spray treatment trees with Hexaconazole @ 5 % SC, Lambda Cyhalothrin @ 5 %<br />

EC and Sulphur @ 80% WP at the time <strong>of</strong> flower bud initiation and fruiting stage.<br />

Observations are recorded from the start <strong>of</strong> vegetative growth, and flowering till the<br />

harvesting <strong>of</strong> fruits.<br />

Results<br />

The per cent hermaphrodite flowers from the number <strong>of</strong> hermaphrodite flowers to the total<br />

number <strong>of</strong> flowers per panicle in each direction in Mallika hybrid was higher in 20 years old<br />

(24.0 %) with spray treatment (24.2 %) in the north direction <strong>of</strong> the tree (24.6 %) (Table 1).<br />

This may be due to the higher proportion <strong>of</strong> hermaphrodite flowers in the 20 years old tree<br />

and male flowers being more than bisexual flowers and along with the flowering behaviour, it<br />

was also affected by the temperature. Both male and hermaphrodite flowers are found within<br />

a single inflorescence. It is the hermaphrodite flowers that <strong>of</strong>ten undergo proper pollination<br />

and fertilization and set fruit. Low temperature during the floral morphogenesis period which<br />

is much before the flower emergence is critical for the proportion <strong>of</strong> hermaphrodite flowers in<br />

mango. Flower bud differentiation in different cultivars and seasons was associated with<br />

higher chlorophyll, carbohydrate and carbohydrate-nitrogen ratio, total phenol, soluble<br />

protein, cytokinin and ethylene, auxin and lower levels <strong>of</strong> IAA oxidase activity and<br />

gibberellic acid (Manjarekar et al., 2018, Rajatiya et al., 2018 and Saheda et al., 2019).<br />

The ability <strong>of</strong> cultivars to bear fruit set also depends upon the availability <strong>of</strong> pollen, its<br />

viability, population <strong>of</strong> pollinating insects and self and cross-compatibility <strong>of</strong> a cultivar,<br />

abortion <strong>of</strong> embryo, low stigmatic receptivity, lack <strong>of</strong> irrigation and competition between<br />

developing fruitlets. Along with these abiotic factors, the incidence <strong>of</strong> powdery mildew,<br />

anthracnose disease, and hoppers can cause flower and fruit drops. The temperature was<br />

found to play a superior role in fruit set, low, as well as high temperatures, affect the fruit set<br />

in mango. Mallika hybrid <strong>of</strong> 20 years <strong>of</strong> aged trees (3.4 %) with a spray <strong>of</strong> plant protection<br />

322 | Page<br />

Climate resilient agriculture for risk mitigation


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

chemicals (3.3 %) in the east direction <strong>of</strong> the tree (3.5 %) has shown a higher fruit set per<br />

cent.<br />

With all the increasing flowering and yield attributes which has contributed to increasing fruit<br />

yield in 20 years <strong>of</strong> aged trees with the plant protection chemicals spray. This is due to an<br />

increase in the per cent hermaphrodite flowers and higher fruit set percentage in these<br />

treatments. The flowering and fruiting depend on the supply <strong>of</strong> photosynthates during flower<br />

bud differentiation, fruit set and fruit development thus, act as a major sink for carbohydrates<br />

(Rattan et al., 2020).<br />

Per cent hermaphrodite flowers per inflorescence, fruit set per cent and yield as<br />

influenced by different ages, management practice and direction in Mallika mango<br />

(Pooled)<br />

20 years (A1) 28 years (A2)<br />

Fruit<br />

Treatment Control<br />

Control<br />

D Mean Treatment yield<br />

PPC (M2)<br />

PPC (M2)<br />

(M1)<br />

(M1)<br />

(kg/tree)<br />

Per cent hermaphrodite flowers<br />

20 years<br />

D 1 - North 24.6 25.4 24.1 24.2 24.6 (A 1)<br />

64.24<br />

D 2 - South 23.3 24.4 23.5 24.0 23.8 28 years<br />

D 3 - East 23.2 23.7 23.6 23.9 23.6 (A 2)<br />

46.60<br />

D 4- West 23.0 24.2 23.7 23.6 23.6 F test *<br />

A - Mean 24.0 23.8 S.Em.+ 2.08<br />

M - Mean 23.6 24.2<br />

A M D<br />

CD at 5% 6.42<br />

F - test NS * * Control<br />

S.Em.+ 0.11 0.11 0.16 (M 1)<br />

46.09<br />

CD at 5% NS 0.32 0.46<br />

AM AD MD AMD<br />

PPC (M 2) 64.75<br />

F - test * NS NS NS<br />

S.Em.+ 0.16 0.23 0.23 0.32<br />

F test *<br />

CD at 5% 0.46 NS NS NS<br />

S.Em.+ 2.08<br />

20 years (A1) 28 years (A2)<br />

Treatment Control<br />

Control<br />

D Mean<br />

PPC (M2)<br />

PPC (M2)<br />

(M1)<br />

(M1)<br />

Fruit set percent<br />

D 1 - North 3.2 3.1 3.2 3.2 3.2<br />

D 2 - South 3.4 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.3<br />

D 3 - East 3.6 3.6 3.4 3.4 3.5<br />

D 4- West 3.6 3.5 3.3 3.4 3.4<br />

A - Mean 3.4 3.3<br />

M - Mean 3.4 3.3<br />

A M D<br />

F - test * NS *<br />

S.Em.+ 0.03 0.03 0.05<br />

CD at 5% 0.09 NS 0.13<br />

AM AD MD AMD<br />

F - test NS NS NS NS<br />

S.Em.+ 0.05 0.07 0.07 0.09<br />

CD at 5% NS NS NS NS<br />

Climate resilient agriculture for risk mitigation<br />

CD at 5% 6.42<br />

A 1M 1 54.13<br />

A1M2 74.34<br />

A2M1 38.04<br />

A2M2 55.17<br />

F test<br />

NS<br />

S.Em.+ 2.94<br />

CD at 5%<br />

NS<br />

323 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

The outcomes <strong>of</strong> the investigation indicated, realizing a higher yield <strong>of</strong> 32.3 – 34.1 o C<br />

temperature, 65.27 per cent relative humidity and 241.9- 319.2 mm <strong>of</strong> rainfall during mango<br />

flowering and fruiting period was found optimum.<br />

References<br />

Manjarekar, R. G., Khanvilkar, M. H., Shirke, G. D., Karle, S. S. And Ahire, P. G., 2018, Effect <strong>of</strong><br />

fertilizer levels on flowering behaviour and yield <strong>of</strong> fruits in mango cv. Alphonso. Int. J.<br />

Curr. Microbiol. App. Sci., 18(6): 508-514.<br />

Rajatiya, J. H., Varu, D. K., Farheen, H. H. And Meera, B. S., 2018, Correlation <strong>of</strong> climatic<br />

parameters with flowering characters <strong>of</strong> Mango. Int. J. Pure App. Biosci., 6(3): 597-601.<br />

Rattan, C. S., Singh, S. K. And Badhan, B. S., 2020, Influence <strong>of</strong> tree age on vegetative growth, leaf<br />

nutrient content and yield <strong>of</strong> Kinnow trees. Plant Arc., 20(2): 5257-5262.<br />

Saheda, M. D., Balahussaini, M., Ramaiah, M. And Balakrishna, M., 2019, Study on Morpho-<br />

Physical Characters <strong>of</strong> Mango Flower Varieties/Hybrids in Kodur Agro-Climatic Conditions.<br />

Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. App., 8(3): 28-38.<br />

T2a-38P-1583<br />

Impact <strong>of</strong> Technology Demonstration through NICRA-Interventions in<br />

Bhagalpur District <strong>of</strong> Bihar<br />

Arvind Kumar Sinha 1 , Sailabala Dei 2 , M.Z. Hoda 1 and A.K. Maurya 1<br />

1 Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Bhagalpur, 2 , Bihar Agricultural University, Sabour, Bhagalpur<br />

ddrbausabour@gmail.com<br />

National Innovations on Climate Resilient Agriculture (NICRA) is a network project <strong>of</strong> the Indian<br />

Council <strong>of</strong> Agricultural Research (ICAR) launched in February 2011. The project aims to enhance the<br />

resilience <strong>of</strong> Indian agriculture to climate change and climate vulnerability through strategic research<br />

and technology demonstration. The research on adaptation and mitigation covers crops, livestock,<br />

fisheries, and natural resource management. The project consists <strong>of</strong> four components viz. Strategic<br />

Research, Technology Demonstration, Capacity Building and Sponsored/Competitive Grants. Climate<br />

change has become an important area <strong>of</strong> concern for India to ensure food and nutritional security for<br />

the growing population. The impacts <strong>of</strong> climate change are global, but countries like India are more<br />

vulnerable because <strong>of</strong> the high population depending on agriculture. In India, significant negative<br />

impacts have been implied with medium-term (2010-2039) climate change, predicted to reduce yields<br />

by 4.5 to 9 percent, depending on the magnitude and distribution <strong>of</strong> warming. Since agriculture makes<br />

up roughly 16 percent <strong>of</strong> India’s GDP, a 4.5 to 9% negative impact on production implies a cost <strong>of</strong><br />

climate change to be roughly up to 1.5 percent <strong>of</strong> GDP per year. The Government <strong>of</strong> India has<br />

accorded high priority to research and development to cope with climate change in the agriculture<br />

sector.<br />

324 | Page<br />

Climate resilient agriculture for risk mitigation


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Methodology<br />

With this background, the ICAR launched a major Project entitled, National Initiative on<br />

Climate Resilient Agriculture (NICRA) during 2010-11 with an outlay <strong>of</strong> Rs.350 crores for<br />

the XI Plan with the following objective to enhance the resilience <strong>of</strong> Indian agriculture<br />

covering crops, livestock, and fisheries to climatic variability and climate change through the<br />

development and application <strong>of</strong> improved production and risk management technologies, to<br />

demonstrate site-specific technology packages on farmers’ fields for adapting to current<br />

climate risks and to enhance the capacity building <strong>of</strong> scientists and other stakeholders in<br />

climate-resilient agricultural research and its application.<br />

Results<br />

The present study has been undertaken to assess the impact <strong>of</strong> the Technology Demonstration<br />

Component (TDC) <strong>of</strong> the NICRA programme being implemented by the Krishi Vigyan<br />

Kendra, Bhagalpur, Bihar running under the administrative umbrella <strong>of</strong> Agricultural<br />

University, Sabour, Bhagalpur. The performance <strong>of</strong> NICRA-interventions taken up during<br />

Kharif-2022 has been assessed for two villages having sizeable areas (12.50 – 17.39 %) and<br />

farmers (11.0 – 23.81%) under rainfed agriculture and compared with non-NICRA intervened<br />

farmers in the villages. The rainfall characteristics <strong>of</strong> the district during Kharif-2022 have<br />

been experienced as the drought year having total rainfall <strong>of</strong> 535.2 mm (45-61%) against the<br />

yearly amount <strong>of</strong> 1173.3 mm, total Kharif rainfall <strong>of</strong> 330 mm (14.54%) against normal <strong>of</strong><br />

955.40 mm. During the major transplanting (paddy) months <strong>of</strong> July and August 2022, the<br />

district has only received a total rainfall <strong>of</strong> 43.60 (14.1%) & 77.00 mm (29.28%) respectively<br />

with three dry spells (710 days:01 & 715 days:02) which resulted in 15.20 days <strong>of</strong> delayed<br />

transplanting and the leap stage has been impacted with heavy weed infestation (28.5%)<br />

along with 35% decrease in transplanting area with a coverage <strong>of</strong> 36.6 acres. Concerning the<br />

variable weather condition, the NICRA-interventions such as transplanting by short-duration<br />

rice varieties; Sahbhagi, Sabour Harshit & Sita has been undertaken in three villages along<br />

with other climates resilient technologies like the introduction <strong>of</strong> paddy or Sabour Shree with<br />

DSR in the medium irrigated land significantly situated in the NICRA villages. Along with<br />

the technologies demonstration component on paddy varieties, for cattle, de-warmer &<br />

chelated mineral mixture along with PPR-vaccinated in goats have been demonstrated. There<br />

has been a significant in area production, productivity, and B: C ratio due to the NICRA<br />

intervention despite the drought stress experienced by farmers during Kharif-2022 in<br />

comparison to the non-NICRA farmers in the villages.<br />

Conclusion<br />

The project has made a significant initial impact and was well-received in most <strong>of</strong> the<br />

districts. Technologies such as on-farm water harvesting in ponds, supplemental irrigation,<br />

Climate resilient agriculture for risk mitigation<br />

325 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

the introduction <strong>of</strong> early maturing drought-tolerant varieties, paddy varieties tolerant to<br />

submergence in flood-prone districts, improved drainage in waterlogged areas, recharging<br />

techniques for tube wells, site-specific nutrient management and management <strong>of</strong> sodic soils,<br />

mulching, use <strong>of</strong> zero till drills were enthusiastically implemented by the farmers in NICRA<br />

villages across the country.<br />

References<br />

Monsoon Action Plan - 2015 Village Level Contingency Plans for Climate Resilient Agriculture.<br />

Atlas on Climate Change Impacts on Crop Water Balance <strong>of</strong> Groundnut (Arachis hypogaea) and<br />

Pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan) in Rainfed Districts <strong>of</strong> Andhra Pradesh.<br />

Atlas on Climate Change Impacts on Crop Water Balance <strong>of</strong> Cotton (Gossypium herbaceum) and<br />

Maize (Zea mays L.) in Telangana.<br />

AICRPAM - NICRA Annual Report 2014-15.<br />

Effect <strong>of</strong> Pusa Hydrogel on Pearl Millet Crop Yield under Rainfed<br />

Farming<br />

Ramesh Kumar, Ashish Shivran, Poonam Yadav and Manjeet<br />

T2a-39P<br />

Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Mahendergarh, Chaudhary Charan Singh Haryana Agricultural University,<br />

Hisar, Haryana<br />

sckvkmgarh@hau.ac.in<br />

Pearlmillet is a rainfed crop generally grown in arid regions due to high-stress tolerance, and<br />

low water use efficiency. In arid regions or rainfed regions agroclimatic conditions are very<br />

challenging due to scanty rainfall, its distribution, low fertility and poor water-holding<br />

capacity <strong>of</strong> soils, high evaporative demand, and extreme temperature during the year. The<br />

study's objective is to measure the effect <strong>of</strong> hydrogel in pearl millet by reducing water stress<br />

and improving grain yield. In the NICRA project, we have selected ten farmers’ in two<br />

rainfed villages i.e. Bairawas and Gadania in the Mahendergarh district <strong>of</strong> Haryana in India.<br />

Methodology<br />

Pearlmillet variety HHB-67 (Improved) was sown in 45 cm row spacing and recommended<br />

doses <strong>of</strong> fertilizers and other cultivation practices were adopted. Seed treatment was done and<br />

then sowing <strong>of</strong> seed with Pusa hydrogel. The rainfall received during the growing period<br />

(June to September) was 557.1 mm in 2022. Actual observed data collected from existing<br />

automated weather stations at KVK, Mahendergarh were used to establish the uncertainties <strong>of</strong><br />

the secondary data. Focus Group Discussions (FGD) was designed to assess the existing<br />

326 | Page<br />

Climate resilient agriculture for risk mitigation


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

cropping system (e.g., rainfed vs. rainfed with hydrogel application), management practices,<br />

yield gaps, major constraints, and resource availability for the two sites.<br />

Results<br />

The two sites <strong>of</strong> study, Bairawas, and Gadania located in South Haryana <strong>of</strong> rainfed regions,<br />

presented a similar range <strong>of</strong> productivity despite their difference in cropping system<br />

management practices and their level <strong>of</strong> risk <strong>of</strong> climatic stresses. The average actual yield<br />

reported in the sites ranged from 22.5 to 25 q/ha. These yield values indicated a large<br />

potential to increase yield in these sites by using an application <strong>of</strong> hydrogel under the existing<br />

environmental conditions. The increase in pearmillet yield is 14 to 23 percent from rainfed +<br />

Pusa hydrogel as compared to rainfed pearlmillet only.<br />

Conclusion<br />

It may be concluded that the application <strong>of</strong> pusa hydrogel in the rainfed region is beneficial<br />

for water stress overcome in the pearl millet crop (HHB-67 Imp.) and increases crop yield.<br />

T2a-40P-1566<br />

Impact <strong>of</strong> Climate Resilient Practices on Cabbage Productivity in NICRA<br />

Villages <strong>of</strong> Tuensang District in Nagaland<br />

Pijush Kanti Biswas, Kerimenla and Watisenla Imsong<br />

Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Tuensang, Nagaland-798612<br />

Cabbage is the number one vegetable and source <strong>of</strong> survival for majority <strong>of</strong> the small holder<br />

farmers across the Tuensang district. Yet the crop frequently fails when hit by the severe<br />

recurrent droughts. Small scale farmers beset by erratic rainfall and drought like situation in<br />

the district since many years. Cabbage variety Rareball performed very well in stress prone<br />

areas coupled with climate resilient practices like seedling raised in polypropylene trays,<br />

polythene mulching or mulching by locally available leaves. To know the impact <strong>of</strong> climate<br />

resilient practices on Cabbage productivity a study was carried out during 2021-22. A total <strong>of</strong><br />

20 farmers were selected in adopted NICRA village as well as non-adopted nearby village.<br />

The result <strong>of</strong> the study revealed that majority <strong>of</strong> the farmers under adopted village who<br />

followed the proper climate resilient practices has achieved good yield compare to the nonadopted<br />

nearby village farmers. In drought or uneven and erratic rainfall situation <strong>of</strong><br />

Tuensang district, drought resistant variety <strong>of</strong> Cabbage (Rareball) along with climate resilient<br />

practices is recorded productivity increase upto 20 percent over non-adopted farmers field.<br />

Climate resilient agriculture for risk mitigation<br />

327 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

T2a-41P-1493<br />

Enhance the Climate Resilience Through Rainfed Agriculture under<br />

NICRA Project in Srikakulam District <strong>of</strong> North Coastal AP<br />

G. Naveen Kumar*, B.Mounika, S.Kiran kumar, K.Bhagya Lakshmi, P.Amara Jyothi,<br />

D.Chinnam Naidu, G.Chitti Babu, S.Neelaveni, Ch.BalaKrishna, V.Hari Kumar,<br />

S.Anusha, B.Suneetha<br />

Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Amadalavalasa, Srikakulam District, AP<br />

*naveengottapu.1992@gmail.com<br />

Rainfed agriculture is practiced in 80% <strong>of</strong> net cultivated area under Rabi in Srikakulam<br />

district. Due to lack <strong>of</strong> proper irrigation and water sources, farmers are mainly depending on<br />

rainfed agriculture during this period. By keeping this in view KVK Srikakulam implemented<br />

NICRA project in five villages to minimize the crop losses during rabi. Under NICRA project<br />

KVK, Srikakulam promoted water conservation and crop diversification with zero tillage<br />

maize, Rice fallows pulses, ICM practices in sesamum during rabi season. These efforts have<br />

been made through NICRA towards climate resilient rainfed agriculture to enhance the<br />

adaptive capacity <strong>of</strong> farmers. On-farm participatory demonstration <strong>of</strong> climate resilient<br />

practices under cluster village mode helped famers to cope with aberrant weather and <strong>of</strong>fseason<br />

floods and dry spells. Establishing village level institutions such as village climate risk<br />

management committees (VCRMC), custom hiring centres for farm mechanization, seed and<br />

fodder production systems and mechanism for agro-advisories to develop climate resilient<br />

villages<br />

The initiatives like development or renovation <strong>of</strong> community tank bunds were promoted to<br />

build sustainable and risk resilient rainfed agriculture. Capacity building <strong>of</strong> farmers on<br />

climate resilient technologies increased preparedness for weather and climate risk. Several<br />

resilient technologies like water saving technologies and crop diversification with zero tillage<br />

maize, ragi cultivation, rice fallows pulses, ICM practices in sesamum in rabi season have<br />

been integrated to achieving climate resilient rainfed agriculture. Upscaling <strong>of</strong> resilient<br />

technologies through KVK initiative created better preparedness in climate resilient rainfed<br />

agriculture in adopted villages. Implementation <strong>of</strong> NICRA by KVK had done excellence in<br />

reimagining climate resilient rainfed agriculture for better living <strong>of</strong> farmers through reduced<br />

crop loss and increasing the net income <strong>of</strong> farmers in the region <strong>of</strong> Srikakulam district <strong>of</strong><br />

north coastal Andhra Pradesh.<br />

NRM Works in NICRA Project: Renovation <strong>of</strong> Jagannada Naidu water tank under<br />

NRM- NICRA<br />

Due to low tank capacity, weakened sluices and bunds, floods in tank fed areas affected the<br />

crop yields. Main objective <strong>of</strong> this NRM work is to reduce the flood in tank fed fields and to<br />

328 | Page<br />

Climate resilient agriculture for risk mitigation


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

overcome water scarcity at early & later stages <strong>of</strong> the crop. In 2011-12 water storage capacity<br />

was 55,531m 3 . After completion <strong>of</strong> NRM through NICRA project the water storage capacity<br />

was increased up to 1,38,575 m 3 (25 acres in 4.5 feet depth) and the cultivated area increased<br />

from 12ha (2011-12) to 45ha (2021-22) in rabi season.<br />

Upscalling <strong>of</strong> Dry land crops in zero tillage cultivation in rice fallows<br />

In Srikakulam district farmers are following the conventional method <strong>of</strong> cultivation for crops<br />

such as maize, pulses, ragi, sunhemp, these methods <strong>of</strong> sowing not only waste the residual<br />

moisture <strong>of</strong> the field but also involves many operational costs. Thus, to avoid such moisture<br />

loss and to make it more economical KVK, Srikakulam has introduced zero tillage maize,<br />

ragi, sunhemp and pulses in rice fallows as part <strong>of</strong> NICRA project. Proper utilization <strong>of</strong><br />

residual moisture coupled with remunerative prices for the farmers is the main objective <strong>of</strong><br />

this NICRA project.<br />

Maize<br />

Ragi<br />

Upscalling Zero tillage maize cultivation in<br />

rice fallow in Iskalapalem village<br />

Sunhemp<br />

Upcalling Zero tillage Ragi cultivation in rice<br />

fallow in kondavalasa village<br />

Pulses<br />

Sunhemp seed production under rice fallow<br />

in sirusuwada village<br />

Conclusion<br />

Rice fallow pulses (Black gram, Greengram)<br />

in Iskalapalem village<br />

Climate resilient agriculture for risk mitigation<br />

329 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Krishi vigyan Kendra Srikakulam implemented various initiatives such as promotion <strong>of</strong> water<br />

saving technologies and crop diversification under NICRA villages in Srikakulam district <strong>of</strong><br />

Andhra Pradesh. These initiatives not only reduced cost and labour but also created<br />

awareness among the farmers towards climate vulnerability. Various activities such as<br />

renovation <strong>of</strong> community tank bunds, capacity building <strong>of</strong> famers, promotion <strong>of</strong> climate<br />

resilient technologies and formation <strong>of</strong> VCRMC (Village climate risk management<br />

committee) by KVK helped the famers to mitigate climatic risk.<br />

330 | Page<br />

Climate resilient agriculture for risk mitigation


Theme– 3<br />

Managing genetic resources for enhanced<br />

stress tolerance


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Theme – 3: Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance<br />

List <strong>of</strong> <strong>Extended</strong> Summaries<br />

S.No Title First Author ID<br />

1 Evaluation <strong>of</strong> Eggplant Wild Relatives,<br />

Landraces and Cultivars for Deficit Moisture<br />

Stress Tolerance<br />

2 Mapping QTLs for Various Yield Component<br />

and Stress Indices in Recombinant Inbred Lines<br />

Populations <strong>of</strong> Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)<br />

3 Studies on Soybean Based Rainfed Cropping<br />

Sequences in Vertisols <strong>of</strong> Madhya Pradesh<br />

4 Samrat Bt – A New, Early Maturing Bt Cotton<br />

Variety for Stress Resilience and Multiple<br />

Cropping in Rainfed Agro-Ecologies <strong>of</strong> South<br />

India<br />

5 Characterization and Evaluation <strong>of</strong> Pigeonpea<br />

Mini Core Collection for Moisture Stress<br />

Tolerance in Rainfed Condition<br />

KT Jayalakshmi<br />

Godawari Pawar<br />

Narendra Kumawat<br />

HB Santosh<br />

K Salini<br />

T3-01O-1297<br />

T3-02O-1393<br />

T3-03O-1463<br />

T3-04O-1123<br />

T3-05R-1029<br />

6 Salt Tolerance in Transgenic Pigeonpea Neeru Singh Redhu T3-06R-1584<br />

7 Performance <strong>of</strong> Tamarind Accessions under<br />

Dryland Conditions.<br />

8 Administering the Natural Genetic Diversity for<br />

Improving Stress Tolerance<br />

9 Effect <strong>of</strong> Different Weed Control Management<br />

Practices on Kharif French Bean<br />

10 Integrated Pest Management Strategies for Fall<br />

Army Worm in Southern Telangana<br />

11 Performance <strong>of</strong> Pigeonpea (BDN 711) Under<br />

Rainfed Condition in Beed District <strong>of</strong><br />

Maharashtra<br />

12 Isolation and Quantitative Screening <strong>of</strong> Potential<br />

Fungal Isolates for Cellulase Activity<br />

13 Yellow revolution Success in Sodic Soil<br />

Through Salt Resistant Variety <strong>of</strong> Mustard (CS-<br />

58)<br />

14 Weed Management Strategies Under Different<br />

Tillage Systems in Wet Direct Seeded Rice<br />

AGK Reddy<br />

RS Telem<br />

KA Chavan<br />

A Ramakrishna Babu<br />

HS Garud<br />

Savitha Santosh<br />

AK Srivastava<br />

P Gayathri<br />

T3-07R-1040<br />

T3-08R-1444<br />

T3-09R-1356<br />

T3-10R-1220<br />

T3-11R-1009<br />

T3-11aR-1263<br />

T3-12P-1433<br />

T3-13P-1253<br />

331 | Page Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

S.No Title First Author ID<br />

15 Screening Potato Varieties and Advanced<br />

Clones for Maximizing Organic Tuber<br />

Productivity<br />

16 Assessment <strong>of</strong> Performance <strong>of</strong> Drought Tolerant<br />

Rice Variety in Koshi region<br />

17 Drought Tolerant and High Yielding Groundnut<br />

Varieties for Rainfed Ecosystem in Perambalur<br />

district<br />

18 Eco-friendly Management <strong>of</strong> White Grub- A<br />

Devastating Insect Pest <strong>of</strong> Rainfed Agro-<br />

Ecosystem in Uttarakhand Hills<br />

19 Effect <strong>of</strong> Crop Geometry on Growth and Yield<br />

Under Direct Seeded Hybrid Rice (Oryza Sativa<br />

L.) Cultivars<br />

20 Evaluation <strong>of</strong> Bamboo Species Suitable for<br />

Southern Telangana Region<br />

21 Evaluation <strong>of</strong> Different Herbicides in Kharif<br />

Sweet Corn (Zea mays saccharata.L)<br />

22 Evaluation <strong>of</strong> F3:4 Population for Seedling<br />

Stage Salinity Tolerance in Rice (Oryza sativa<br />

L.)<br />

23 Evaluation <strong>of</strong> Newer Insecticides Against<br />

Safflower Aphid, Uroleucon compositae<br />

(Theobald)<br />

24 Evaluation <strong>of</strong> STRVs Under Different Crop<br />

Establishment System in Rainfed Stress-Prone<br />

Upland Rice Ecosystem <strong>of</strong> Eastern Uttar<br />

Pradesh<br />

25 High Resolution Dissection <strong>of</strong> Photosystem II<br />

Electron Transport Under Elevated CO2 and<br />

Elevated Temperature under Carbon Dioxide<br />

and Temperature Gradient Chambers (CTGC) in<br />

Pearl Millet (Pennisetum glaucum L.)<br />

26 Impact <strong>of</strong> Adoption on Improved Varieties <strong>of</strong><br />

Chickpea (Cicer Arietinum) on Yield<br />

Performance under NICRA Village <strong>of</strong> Ratlam<br />

District in Madhya Pradesh<br />

Pooja Mankar<br />

PK Chaudhary<br />

M Punithavathi<br />

Kamal K Pande<br />

Ajoy Das<br />

G Venkatesh<br />

SB Tambare<br />

M Vani Praveena<br />

SM Gangurde<br />

Kajal Verma<br />

Arun K. Shanker<br />

GP Tiwari<br />

T3-14P-1485<br />

T3-15P-1208<br />

T3-16P-1414<br />

T3-17P-1425<br />

T3-18P-1285<br />

T3-19P-1045<br />

T3-20P-1218<br />

T3-21P-1420<br />

T3-22P-1543<br />

T3-23P-1191<br />

T3-24P-1050<br />

T3-25P-1470<br />

Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance<br />

332 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

S.No Title First Author ID<br />

27 Impact <strong>of</strong> Nutritional Manipulation in Cattle <strong>of</strong><br />

Saline Coastal Areas <strong>of</strong> Sundarban for Stress<br />

Management<br />

28 Management <strong>of</strong> Fall Armyworm, Spodoptera<br />

Frugiperda in Organic Sorghum Cultivation<br />

29 Morpho-Physiological Characterization <strong>of</strong><br />

Drought Stress Tolerance at Flowering Stage in<br />

Black Gram (Vigna mungo L. Hepper)<br />

30 Performance <strong>of</strong> Buckwheat (Fagopyrum<br />

esculentum Moench) Genotypes Under Varied<br />

Fertility Levels in Northern Transition Zone <strong>of</strong><br />

Karnataka<br />

31 Performance <strong>of</strong> Chickpea (Var.Phule Vikram)<br />

Under Rainfed Condition in Solapur District <strong>of</strong><br />

Maharashtra<br />

32 Performance <strong>of</strong> Chickpea Varieties Under Late<br />

Sown Condition<br />

33 PGPR Strain Bbv57 Controls Stalk Rot <strong>of</strong> Maize<br />

Caused by Fusarium Verticillioides<br />

34 Physiological Parameters and Key Root Traits<br />

Contributing to Yield Potentital <strong>of</strong> Sorghum in<br />

the Northern Dry Zone <strong>of</strong> Karnataka<br />

35 Productivity Enhancement <strong>of</strong> Lentil (Lens<br />

esculenta Moench) in Rainfed Agro-Ecosystem<br />

in Koshi Region <strong>of</strong> Bihar<br />

36 Productivity Enhancement Using Drought<br />

Tolerant Banana Variety Through Frontline<br />

Demonstrations in Perambalur District <strong>of</strong><br />

Tamilnadu<br />

37 Response <strong>of</strong> Clusterbean (Gum Gaur) Genotypes<br />

to Planting Geometry in Rainfed Conditions<br />

38 Screening Maize Inbred Lines Developed from<br />

Local Germplasm for Excess Moisture<br />

Tolerance<br />

39 Study on Inter-Relation <strong>of</strong> Yield and the<br />

Associated Traits in Maize Hybrids Under<br />

Rainfed Conditions<br />

C Majhi<br />

G Shyam Prasad<br />

B Sarkar<br />

HP Keerthi<br />

SG Jadhav<br />

SV Thombre<br />

Radhajeyalakshmi<br />

Raju<br />

RS Venkatesha<br />

KM Singh<br />

V Sangeetha<br />

RA Nandagavi<br />

E Lamalakshmi Devi<br />

KRV Sathya Sheela<br />

T3-26P-1489<br />

T3-27P-1188<br />

T3-28P-1331<br />

T3-29P-1525<br />

T3-30P-1336<br />

T3-31P-1418<br />

T3-32P-1223<br />

T3-33P-1211<br />

T3-34P-1554<br />

T3-35P:1426<br />

T3-36P-1240<br />

T3-37P-1245<br />

T3-38P-1241<br />

333 | Page Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

S.No Title First Author ID<br />

40 Transpiration Efficiency in Pearl Millet Hybrid<br />

and Open Pollinated Variety<br />

41 Variability in Growth and Yield Responses <strong>of</strong><br />

Four Blackgram Genotypes at Elevated CO 2<br />

42 Varietal Performance Arid Fruit Crop<br />

Pomegranate under Vidarbha Region <strong>of</strong><br />

Maharashtra State<br />

43 Assessment <strong>of</strong> Genetic Diversity Among the<br />

Maize (Zea Mays L.) Genotypes Based on SSR<br />

Markers Linked to Drought Tolerance<br />

N Jyothi Lakshmi<br />

M Vanaja<br />

RS Wankhade<br />

P Sathish<br />

T3-39P-1088<br />

T3-40P-1086<br />

T3-41P-1169<br />

T3-42P<br />

Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance<br />

334 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

T3-01O-1297<br />

Evaluation <strong>of</strong> Eggplant Wild Relatives, Landraces and Cultivars for Deficit<br />

Moisture Stress Tolerance<br />

K.T. Jayalakshmi, R.H. Laxman, S. Kannan, P. Hemamalini, K.S. Shivashankara and<br />

T.H. Singh<br />

ICAR-Indian Institute <strong>of</strong> Horticultural Research, Hesaraghatta, Bengaluru-560 089, India<br />

Eggplant (Solanum melongena L.), also known as brinjal belonging to Solanaceae family is an<br />

important vegetable grown in many tropical and subtropical areas <strong>of</strong> the world. Brinjal<br />

cultivation in India is estimated to cover about 8.14% <strong>of</strong> vegetable area with a contribution <strong>of</strong><br />

9% to total vegetable production. The crop is exposed to various biotic and abiotic stresses.<br />

Among the abiotic stresses, deficit water stress is one the most serious environmental<br />

constraints affecting productivity. Under climate change conditions more frequent, longer, and<br />

intense drought spells would increase the scarcity <strong>of</strong> irrigation water. A series <strong>of</strong> consequent<br />

physiological or biochemical adjustments would bring in enhancement <strong>of</strong> the plant defence<br />

against deficit water stress (Kapoor et al., 2020) Identification <strong>of</strong> deficit moisture stress tolerant<br />

cultivars in eggplant is very important to realize sustainable production and judicious use <strong>of</strong><br />

available water (Gobu et al., 2017). Significant differences among hundred varieties <strong>of</strong><br />

eggplant and its wild relatives, for morphological and physiological characteristics, under<br />

drought stress condition were observed (Delfin et al., 2013). There are possibilities <strong>of</strong> selection<br />

<strong>of</strong> drought resistant eggplant varieties. Brinjal can also be used as rootstock as it provides root<br />

system to scions <strong>of</strong> tomato for enhancing tolerance to abiotic stresses. Eggplant is employed as<br />

an important rootstock because <strong>of</strong> its tolerance to biotic and abiotic factors. However,<br />

evaluation needs to be done for exploring the possibility <strong>of</strong> identifying and characterizing<br />

deficit water stress tolerant genotypes having better root characteristics. Thus, the present study<br />

was conducted with an objective to evaluate the diverse genotypes <strong>of</strong> eggplant wild relatives,<br />

land races and cultivars for deficit moisture stress tolerance and consequently identify the<br />

tolerant genotypes.<br />

Methodology<br />

Thirty-four eggplant genotypes were evaluated under 100 per cent field capacity up to 45 DAT.<br />

Based on the mean membership function value (MFV) for root characteristics, such as root<br />

length, root volume and root density and root dry weight, six genotypes with better root<br />

characteristics, viz., Arka Neelkanth, Arka Anand, Kheri Sindhi, Erengeri Local, Solanum<br />

macrocarpon, Solanum torvum and three genotypes, Solanum seaforthianum, Solanum<br />

insanum and Solanum acculeatissimum JRPH/15-008 with poor root characteristics were<br />

selected for further studies under two water regimes, viz., control (100% FC) and water deficit<br />

335 | Page Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

stress (50% FC). The observations on various growth, physiological and biochemical<br />

parameters were recorded following the established procedures.<br />

Results<br />

Under water stress conditions, the genotypes exhibited diverse physiological and biochemical<br />

responses. The genotypes with better root characteristics such as Kheri Sindhi, Erengeri Local<br />

and Solanum macrocarpon showed tolerance to deficit moisture through lower percentage<br />

reduction in root characteristics like root volume, root fresh weight and root dry weight<br />

followed by Arka Neelkanth and Arka Anand and the genotypes with poor root characteristics,<br />

Solanum seaforthianum, Solanum acculeatissimum JRPH/15-008 and Solanum insanum<br />

showed susceptibility with greater reduction in root characteristics.<br />

The genotypes Kheri Sindhi, Erengeri Local and Solanum macrocarpon showed lower percent<br />

reduction in total dry matter production and higher percent increase in root to shoot ratio,<br />

followed by Arka Neelkant and Arka Anand. They also showed lower percent reduction in<br />

leaf relative water content. These genotypes showed lower percent increase in canopy<br />

temperature, higher percent accumulation <strong>of</strong> proline content with lower production <strong>of</strong> MDA.<br />

The genotypes with better root characteristics showed lower ABA and higher cytokinin<br />

content. Whereas the genotypes, Solanum seaforthianum, Solanum acculeatissimum JRPH/15-<br />

008 and Solanum insanum showed lower proline accumulation and higher MDA content. These<br />

genotypes also exhibited higher activity <strong>of</strong> anti-oxidative enzymes and ABA content with<br />

lower cytokine content in roots.<br />

Conclusion<br />

From the results obtained from the present study it is concluded that the genotypes with better<br />

root characteristics, Kheri Sindhi, Erengeri Local and Solanum macrocarpon, Arka Neelkanth<br />

and Arka Anand showed tolerance to deficit moisture stress condition compared to genotypes<br />

with poor root characteristics.<br />

References<br />

Delfin, E., Manaday, S.J., Canama, A.O., Ocampo, E.T.M. and Maghirang, R. 2013.<br />

Assessment <strong>of</strong> the drought response <strong>of</strong> genetically diverse eggplant<br />

genotypes. Philippine Journal <strong>of</strong> Crop Science 38(1): 69-70.<br />

Gobu, R., Harish Babu B.N., Kailash Chandra, Shankar M. and Omprakash. 2017. Genetic<br />

Variability, Heritability and Genetic Advance in Eggplant (Solanum melongena L.)<br />

Genotypes under Normal and Osmotic Stress in invitro condition. Int. J. Curr.<br />

Microbiol. App. Sci. 6(3): 749-760.<br />

Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance<br />

336 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Kapoor, D., Bhardwaj, S., Landi, M., Sharma, A., Ramakrishnan, M. and Sharma, A. 2020.<br />

The impact <strong>of</strong> drought in plant metabolism: How to exploit tolerance mechanisms to<br />

increase crop production. Appl. Sci., 10(16): 5692.<br />

T3-02O-1393<br />

Mapping QTLs for Various Yield Component and Stress Indices in<br />

Recombinant Inbred Lines Populations <strong>of</strong> Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)<br />

Godawari Pawar 1* , Vishwanathan Chinnusamy 2 , Monika Dalal 3 , S. Sudhir Kumar 2 ,<br />

Harikrishna and Biswabiplab Singh 2<br />

1 VNMKV, Parbhani (MS), 2 ICAR-NIPB, New Delhi and 3 ICAR-IARI, New Delhi<br />

*gsp.mau@rediffmail.com<br />

An experimental set up comprising <strong>of</strong> 278 RILs and 2 parental lines was conducted at the<br />

Division <strong>of</strong> Plant Physiology, Indian Agricultural Research Institute (IARI), New Delhi.<br />

Calculation <strong>of</strong> indices mainly focus on selecting genotypes that have high yield firstly under<br />

yield potential conditions (non-stress) and secondly under stress conditions. Multiple stress<br />

indices were calculated on the basis <strong>of</strong> grain yield, thousand grain weight, grain weight per ear,<br />

grain number per ear and harvest index. The correlation among multiple stress indices were<br />

seen and presented. Pattern <strong>of</strong> selection value <strong>of</strong> TOL, SSI and RCI as minimum and STI, MPI,<br />

YSI, HM, GMP and PCI as maximum were considered as indicator for selection <strong>of</strong> RILs. On<br />

this basis <strong>of</strong> TOL, SSI, RCI and YSI some RILs and on the basis <strong>of</strong> STI, MPI, HM, GMP and<br />

PCI we selected some RILs. These RILs are superior under stress condition. In Field trials<br />

calculated stress intensity is 0.38. The larger the value <strong>of</strong> SI, the more severe is the stress<br />

intensity. Grain yield under normal sowing is positively correlated with all indices except STI<br />

(-0.01) and YSI (-0.43). Grain yield under heat stress is showing strong positive association<br />

with HM (0.94) also with GMP (0.88), MP (0.78) negative with TOL (-0.51) and SSI (-<br />

0.74).This results concluded that population with higher HM are superior under stress<br />

conditions and negative association <strong>of</strong> yield under stress with TOL and SSI, it indicates yield<br />

loss under stress conditions. Stress indices MP (0.83, 0.78) and GMP (0.70, 0.88) are suitable<br />

to screen tolerance because positive association with grain yield <strong>of</strong> both treatments. From<br />

correlation <strong>of</strong> different indices, some indices are showing strong association among them so all<br />

indices were selected for further discussion except TOL and MP. Traits related to yield Viz.,<br />

thousand kernel weight, grains/ear, grains weight/ear and harvest index were also used to<br />

calculate indices and their correlation were used for further discussion.<br />

Inclusive composite interval mapping (ICIM) analysis discovered the total <strong>of</strong> 55 putative QTLs<br />

controlling yield related traits and their stress indices based on heat and control conditions on<br />

field. These QTLs were found distributed across the chromosomes with LOD values varied<br />

from 2.509 to 5.485. Among multiple stress indices 9 QTLs controlling the harmonic mean and<br />

337 | Page Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

susceptibility tolerance index, likewise for geometric mean productivity, mean productivity<br />

and production capacity we found 8 QTLs for each index on the basis <strong>of</strong> different yield related<br />

traits i.e. grain numbers per spike, grain weight per spike, thousand kernel weight, total grain<br />

weight and harvest index. We propose this method for evaluation <strong>of</strong> wheat genotypes in terms<br />

<strong>of</strong> their resilience to stress and their production capacity. This methodology will reduce the<br />

time required for first selection and the number <strong>of</strong> first-selected genotypes for further<br />

evaluation by breeders and provide a basis for appropriate comparisons <strong>of</strong> genotypes that would<br />

help reveal the biology behind high stress productivity <strong>of</strong> crops.<br />

T3-03O-1463<br />

Studies on Soybean Based Rainfed Cropping Sequences in Vertisols <strong>of</strong><br />

Madhya Pradesh<br />

Narendra Kumawat*, M.L. Jadav, D.V. Bhagat, S.K. Choudhary and K.S. Bangar<br />

All India Coordinated Research Project for Dryland Farming, College <strong>of</strong> Agriculture (RVSKVV)<br />

Indore – 452 001, Madhya Pradesh, India<br />

*kumawatandy@gmail.com<br />

The traditional cropping systems in kharif are soybean, cotton, maize, etc. and intercropping<br />

systems are soybean + maize/pigeonpea/etc. Length <strong>of</strong> growing period is 90-120 days.<br />

Generally, soybean is grown as a monsoon season crop under rainfed situation mainly under<br />

Vertisols and associated soils. It has resulted increased cropping intensity and pr<strong>of</strong>itability. In<br />

Malwa and Nimar valley region, its cultivation is largely practiced in rainy season followed by<br />

gram/wheat on conserved soil moisture. Under irrigated conditions, soybean is largely grown<br />

in soybean-wheat cropping system, while soybean-chickpea cropping system is prevalent under<br />

rainfed conditions. The major cropping system in the Vertisols and associated soils <strong>of</strong> Central<br />

India under regime is soybean-wheat in which soybean is a rainfed crop.<br />

Methodology<br />

Field experiments were conducted at AICRP for Dryland Agriculture, College <strong>of</strong> Agriculture<br />

(RVSKVV), Indore (MP) during 2018-19 to 2020-21, to find out the suitable cropping<br />

sequences for Malwa and Nimar valley region. Nine cropping sequences including<br />

soybean/maize/blackgram-based cropping systems, viz., soybean-chickpea, soybean-safflower,<br />

soybean-mustard, maize-chickpea, maize-safflower, maize-mustard, blackgram-chickpea,<br />

blackgram-safflower and blackgram -mustard were tested in randomized block design with 5<br />

replications. The present study mainly aims at finding the impact <strong>of</strong> soybean based cropping<br />

sequences on productivity and pr<strong>of</strong>itability under rainfed condition.<br />

Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance<br />

338 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Results<br />

Among the various sequences, soybean equivalent yield <strong>of</strong> maize–chickpea cropping sequence<br />

was the highest (4153 q/ha), followed by maize-mustard (3293 q/ha) and maize–safflower<br />

sequence (3222 q/ha). Existing soybean-chickpea sequence recorded soybean equivalent yield<br />

<strong>of</strong> 2586 t/ha, which is 60.60% lesser than maize-chickpea cropping sequence. The maizechickpea<br />

cropping sequence also recorded the maximum net returns (Rs. 146890/ha) and B:C<br />

ratio (4.67) followed by maize-mustard (Rs.1,48,200/ha Rs.1,08,200/ha and 3.71, respectively)<br />

and maize–safflower sequence (Rs.1,44,990/ha Rs.1,04,990/ha and 3.62, respectively. While<br />

the, highest land use efficiency (98.63%) was noticed with maize-mustard followed by<br />

blackgram-mustard sequence. This might be due to increase in the yield <strong>of</strong> maize and chickpea<br />

under maize-chickpea cropping sequence resulting increase the returns over other cropping<br />

sequences. Higher system pr<strong>of</strong>itability may be attributed to higher productivity <strong>of</strong> maize than<br />

other kharif crops and lower duration <strong>of</strong> the crops in sequence. Similar findings were also<br />

reported by Prajapat et al. (2015) and Singh et al. (2019).<br />

Soybean equivalent yield (SEY), economics and various efficiencies as affected by<br />

Cropping sequence<br />

cropping sequences (Mean data <strong>of</strong> 3 years)<br />

SEY<br />

(kg/ha)<br />

Net<br />

returns <strong>of</strong><br />

system<br />

(Rs. /ha)<br />

B:C<br />

ratio<br />

Total<br />

duration<br />

(days)<br />

Land use<br />

efficiency<br />

(%)<br />

Relative<br />

Production<br />

efficiency<br />

(%)<br />

T 1-Soybean- chickpea 2586 76370 2.91 230 63.01 -<br />

T 2-Soybean- safflower 1606 32250 1.81 273 74.79 -37.91<br />

T 3-Soybean- mustard 1783 40220 2.01 259 70.96 -31.06<br />

T 4-Maize-chickpea 4153 146890 4.67 230 63.01 60.60<br />

T 5-Maize- safflower 3222 104990 3.62 273 74.79 24.59<br />

T 6-Maize- mustard 3293 108200 3.71 372 98.63 27.35<br />

T 7-Blackgram-chickpea 2314 64125 2.60 205 56.16 -10.52<br />

T 8-Blackgram - safflower 1481 26650 1.67 248 67.95 -42.73<br />

T 9-Blackgram - mustard 1444 24995 1.62 347 95.07 -44.15<br />

SEm+ 58 1678 0.07 - - -<br />

LSD (P=0.05) 168 4833 0.20 - - -<br />

References<br />

Singh, D.K., Singh, R., Singh, G.D., Singh, A.P., Chaturdevi, S., Singh, J.P., Rathi, A. and<br />

Singh, M. 2019. Diversification <strong>of</strong> rice (Oryza sativa)-wheat (Triticum aestivum)<br />

system and its influence on productivity, pr<strong>of</strong>itability and energetics under on-farm<br />

situation. Indian J. Agron., 62 (3): 255-259.<br />

339 | Page Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Prajapat, K., Vyas, A.K. and Dhar, S. 2015. Effect <strong>of</strong> cropping systems and nutrient<br />

management practices on growth, productivity, economics and nutrient uptake <strong>of</strong><br />

soybean (Glycine max). Indian J. Agric. Sci., 85(9): 1138-1143.<br />

Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance<br />

T3-04O-1123<br />

Samrat Bt – A New, Early Maturing Bt Cotton Variety for Stress Resilience<br />

and Multiple Cropping in Rainfed Agro-Ecologies <strong>of</strong> South India<br />

H. B. Santosh *1,4 , S. Manickam 1 , S. B. Singh 1 , V. N. Waghmare 1 , K. P. Raghavendra 1 ,<br />

Vivek Shah 1 , K. R. Kranthi 2 , Kunal Gaikwad 1 , S. S. Patil 3 , G. Ravindra Chary 4 and<br />

V.K. Singh 4<br />

1 ICAR – Central Institute for Cotton Research, Nagpur 440010, Maharashtra<br />

2 International Cotton Advisory Committee, Washington DC 20006-1635, USA<br />

3 University <strong>of</strong> Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad 580005, Karnataka<br />

4 ICAR-Central Research Institute on Dryland Agriculture, Hyderabad 500059<br />

* hb.santosh@icar.gov.in<br />

Bt cotton was developed as an alternate strategy to the previously used hazardous insecticides<br />

to circumvent bollworm problem. Though majority <strong>of</strong> cotton production in India comes from<br />

Bt cotton, the cotton productivity in India is low compared to world average (>750 kg/hectare)<br />

and is found stagnated at around 500 kg lint per hectare for past many years (Kranthi and Stone,<br />

2020). One <strong>of</strong> the reasons attributed to this productivity stagnation is deployment <strong>of</strong> Bt<br />

technology in the form <strong>of</strong> Bt hybrids in rainfed conditions which accounts to more than 60%<br />

<strong>of</strong> cotton area in India. Majority <strong>of</strong> the popular Bt hybrids are long duration that suffer moisture<br />

stress at boll formation stage due to poor water retention <strong>of</strong> shallow soils in rainfed regions.<br />

Productivity enhancement in India can come from yield improvement in rainfed ecosystems<br />

through development and deployment <strong>of</strong> Bt cotton varieties (Singh et al., 2021). Additionally,<br />

to address the menace <strong>of</strong> Pink bollworm and also to enable farmers taking multiple crops, we<br />

embarked upon development <strong>of</strong> early maturing Bt cotton varieties for rainfed agro-ecologies<br />

<strong>of</strong> India.<br />

Methodology<br />

An F 2 population <strong>of</strong> the 4 parental cross [(Bikaneri Narma Bt × RCRSC7) × (RCRSC2 ×<br />

RCRSC12)] was phenotyped for traits <strong>of</strong> interest like crop maturity, plant architecture, jassid<br />

tolerance, yield and fibre quality attributes at ICAR-CICR, Nagpur during Kharif, 2013-14.<br />

The promising plants were selected, advanced and stabilized through pedigree breeding during<br />

2014-15 to 2017-18. The presence <strong>of</strong> Bt gene (cry1Ac) and transgenic event (Mon531) was<br />

confirmed through ELISA and event specific PCR. The homozygosity <strong>of</strong> the transgene was<br />

confirmed through zygosity PCR. The rapid generation advancement was achieved by taking<br />

<strong>of</strong>f-season crop at CICR Regional Station, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu. The most promising<br />

340 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

entries were sponsored for third party evaluation to ‘ICAR-AICRP on Cotton’ at different<br />

rainfed locations <strong>of</strong> South India.<br />

Results<br />

The sponsored entry, Bt 183059-2 was evaluated under rainfed conditions at 25 locations <strong>of</strong> south<br />

India over 3 years along with appropriate Bt and non-Bt checks. This variety has yielded an average<br />

<strong>of</strong> 1373 kg/ha <strong>of</strong> seed cotton across locations in ICAR-AICRP trials. The potential yield <strong>of</strong> this<br />

variety is 2414 kg/ha which was recorded at Mudhole during 2019-20. The average boll weight <strong>of</strong><br />

this entry is 3.7g with a potential <strong>of</strong> 4.7g. This medium staple Bt cotton genotype possesses an<br />

average ginning out turn (GOT) <strong>of</strong> 36.7% with the potential <strong>of</strong> 42.0%. This variety is compact in<br />

plant architecture with an average <strong>of</strong> less than 1 monopodia for plant with average <strong>of</strong> 70.32 bolls<br />

for metre square indicating its amenability to HDPS.<br />

Performance <strong>of</strong> Samrat Bt in ICAR-AICRP trials under rainfed conditions <strong>of</strong> southern<br />

India during 2018-2021<br />

Trait group<br />

Plant<br />

architectural<br />

traits<br />

Yield and<br />

yield<br />

component<br />

traits<br />

Fibre quality<br />

traits<br />

Response<br />

against<br />

insects<br />

Trait<br />

Trial<br />

Locations<br />

Plant height (cm) 25 105.83<br />

Monopodia (No’s) 25 0.97<br />

Sympodia (No’s) 25 16.63<br />

Mean yield (kg/ha) 25 1373.64<br />

Bolls per plant (No’s) 25 16.4<br />

Bolls per square meter (No’s) 25 70.32<br />

Lint index 25 4.93<br />

Seed Index (g) 25 9.07<br />

GOT (%) 25 36.77<br />

Upper Half Mean Length (mm) 25 25.17<br />

Micronaire (µg/inch) 25 4.83<br />

Bundle Strength (g/tex) 25 25.1<br />

Uniformity Index (%) 25 82.4<br />

Samrat Bt<br />

(CICR-H Bt Cotton 63)<br />

Jassid/Leaf hopper (No. / 3 leaf) 16 3.69 (BETL)<br />

Thrips (No. / 3 leaf) 16 6.97 (BETL)<br />

Whitefly (No. / 3 leaf) 16 1.4 (BETL)<br />

Pink bollworm (no./10 bolls) 11 0.98 (BETL)<br />

Helicoverpa armigera (no. per 5 plants) 12 0 (BETL)<br />

Erias vittella (no. per 5 plants) 12 0 (BETL)<br />

Spodoptera litura (no. per 5 plants) 12 0 (BETL)<br />

Bacterial leaf blight (PDI) 7 6.83 (R)<br />

Response Alternaria leaf blight (PDI) 8 25.58 (MR)<br />

against<br />

diseases Rust (PDI) 6 16.74 (R)<br />

Grey mildew 7 8.45 (R)<br />

Note: BETL – Below economic threshold level; R- Resistant; MR – Moderately resistant;<br />

341 | Page Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

This variety was identified for release based on its exceptional performance in ICAR-AICRP<br />

on Cotton Trials for 3 years across locations. This variety was recommended in the 84 th meeting<br />

<strong>of</strong> Central Sub-Committee on Crop Standards, Notification and Release <strong>of</strong> Varieties for<br />

Agricultural Crops on 13 th July 2022 and consequently the variety was notified in the Official<br />

Gazette <strong>of</strong> Government <strong>of</strong> India via S.O. 4065(E) dated 31 st August 2022.<br />

Conclusion<br />

Field view, plant view, flower, green boll and open boll <strong>of</strong> the Bt variety – Samrat Bt<br />

This new Bt cotton variety (Samrat Bt) is a medium staple variety, tolerant to jassids (major<br />

sucking pest on cotton), early in maturity (140-150 days), suitable for HDPS and mechanized<br />

harvesting <strong>of</strong> cotton. It combines good tolerance to pest and diseases. With early maturity,<br />

Samrat Bt can help to Indian cotton farmers to escape from damage <strong>of</strong> pink bollworm, terminal<br />

drought stress and also provide an opportunity for taking up second crop. This new Bt variety<br />

can help cotton farmers in rainfed regions <strong>of</strong> south India achieve better productivity,<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>itability and sustainability <strong>of</strong> cotton production.<br />

References<br />

Kranthi, K. R. and Stone, G. D. 2020. Long-term impacts <strong>of</strong> Bt cotton in India. Nat. Plants.<br />

6(3): 188-196.<br />

Singh, S. B., Venugopalan, M. V., Santosh, H. B., Raghavendra, K. P. and Balasubramani, G.<br />

2021. Bt varieties for increasing cotton yields under rainfed ecosystem. Cotton Innovate.<br />

6(1): 1-3.<br />

ICAR-AICRP on Cotton Reports 2019-20, 2020-21 and 2021-22 available at<br />

http://aiccip.cicr.org.in/main_aiccip_reports.html<br />

Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance<br />

342 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

T3-05R-1029<br />

Characterization and Evaluation <strong>of</strong> Pigeon Pea Mini-Core Collection for<br />

Moisture Stress Tolerance Under Rainfed Condition<br />

K. Salini*, B. Sarkar, N. Sridhar, N. Jyothilakshmi, M.Vanaja, M. Maheswari and<br />

V. K. Singh<br />

ICAR-Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, Hyderabad, Telangana 500059, India<br />

*K.Salini@icar.gov.in<br />

Pigeon pea [Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.] is an important grain legume grown for its proteinrich<br />

seeds for human consumption, their ability to restore and maintain soil fertility by nitrogen<br />

fixation, and their suitability to fit very well into various cropping patterns. With climate<br />

change looming large and threatening agricultural production systems, the major emphasis is<br />

on the breeding <strong>of</strong> stress-tolerant crop varieties by utilizing genetic resources that may be better<br />

adapted to changing climatic conditions. The objective <strong>of</strong> the study was to identify the moisture<br />

stress tolerant accession among the mini-core collection <strong>of</strong> pigeon pea thereby genetic<br />

resources can be utilized for breeding for enhanced moisture stress tolerance.<br />

Methodology<br />

A total <strong>of</strong> 127 germplasm accessions <strong>of</strong> the mini-core collections <strong>of</strong> pigeon pea from ICRISAT<br />

were evaluated in rainfed conditions in Augmented Block Design at Hayathnagar Research<br />

Farm, ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad during 2018-19. Biometrical characters viz., days to 50%<br />

flowering, days to maturity, plant height (cm), number <strong>of</strong> branches, number <strong>of</strong> pods, pod weight<br />

(g), total biomass (g), harvest index and seed yield (g) were recorded. Physiological parameters<br />

like Soil Plant Analytical Development (SPAD) Chlorophyll Meter Reading, canopy<br />

temperature (SCMR) ( 0 C), net photosynthetic rate (µmolCO 2/m 2 /sec), stomatal conductance<br />

(mmol H2O/m 2 /sec), transpiration rate (cm/sec) and leaf temperature ( 0 C) were also recorded.<br />

Results<br />

In the mini-core collections, the days to 50% flowering ranged from 71 (ICP 14903) to 178<br />

(ICP 15109) with an average <strong>of</strong> 124 days. The days to maturity ranged from 113 (ICP 14819)<br />

to 233 (ICP 14801) with a mean <strong>of</strong> 183 days. The plant height ranged from 52.67 (ICP 11627)<br />

to 177.33 (ICP 10654) with an average value <strong>of</strong> 133.28 cm. The number <strong>of</strong> branches per plant<br />

ranged from 8 (ICP 11627) to 28 (ICP 10559) with an average <strong>of</strong> 17.06. The number <strong>of</strong> pods<br />

per plant ranged from 13 (ICP 14229) to 305 (ICP 7) with a mean <strong>of</strong> 72. Pod weight per plant<br />

ranged from 10.38 (ICP 14229) to 97.64 (ICP 10503) with an average <strong>of</strong> 33.55 gm/plant. Seed<br />

yield per plant ranged from 7.3 (ICP 15161) to 58 (ICP 7057) with an average <strong>of</strong> 22.18<br />

gm/plant. Total biomass ranged from 36.43 ((ICP 11627) to 233.8 (ICP 5142) with a mean <strong>of</strong><br />

343 | Page Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

119.59 gm/plant. Harvest index ranged from 15.14 (ICP 10477) to 24.81 (ICP 9750) with an<br />

average <strong>of</strong> 19%.<br />

Based on days to 50% flowering, the genotypes were grouped into different maturity groups.<br />

Extra short maturing genotypes (51-70 days) were absent in the mini-core collection. Thirteen<br />

genotypes were grouped into the category <strong>of</strong> short duration (71-100 days), 12 in short medium<br />

duration (101-110 days), 79 in medium duration (111-140 days), 18 in medium-long duration<br />

(141-160 days) and five in long duration (>160 days). Upadhyaya et al., 2006 evaluated core<br />

and mini-core collection <strong>of</strong> pigeon pea for traits associated with drought tolerance under<br />

terminal drought stress conditions and earliness was used as characters for screening for<br />

drought tolerance.<br />

The promising accessions were identified for different characters. The accessions ICP10654,<br />

ICP4903, ICP7869, ICP12596, ICP10559, ICP9414, ICP9691, ICP8757, ICP1273 and<br />

ICP8602 recorded plant height <strong>of</strong> more than 153 cm. The highest number <strong>of</strong> primary branches<br />

per plant (>25) was observed in the accessions ICP10559, ICP12596, ICP7076, ICP12298,<br />

ICP9336, ICP9750, ICP4392, ICP4167and ICP6859. The accessions ICP7, ICP14444,<br />

ICP3049, ICP15493, ICP12142, ICP9691, ICP7223, ICP5863, ICP995, ICP6128 and ICP 939<br />

recorded more than 140 pods per plant. Higher pod weight (>55g/plant) was observed in<br />

accessions ICP10503, ICP7057, ICP6971, ICP6929, ICP12142, ICP7, ICP6992, ICP6370,<br />

ICP6049, ICP8152 and ICP 5863. High-yielding accessions (>35g/plant) were ICP7057,<br />

ICP12142, ICP7, ICP10503, ICP4307, ICP6929, ICP3049, ICP6971, ICP5142 and ICP6992.<br />

The accessions ICP5142, ICP11477, ICP6815, ICP5863, ICP13577, ICP6971, ICP6370,<br />

ICP10559, ICP11823, ICP12596 and ICP 7 recorded total biomass <strong>of</strong> more than 200g/plant.<br />

Higher harvest index (>20%) was recorded in accessions ICP9750, ICP9691, ICP9336,<br />

ICP10228, ICP8949, ICP12298, ICP13633, ICP14147, ICP12680, ICP12410 and ICP 8949.<br />

Choudhary et al., 2011 concluded that agronomic traits such as pods/plant and seed yield/plant<br />

under actual water deficit condition should be given much importance while breeding for<br />

drought resistance in pigeon pea.<br />

Physiological characterization <strong>of</strong> mini-core collection revealed that SCMR ranged from 43.27<br />

(ICP 6370) to 68.07 (ICP 4029) with an average value <strong>of</strong> 51.23. The canopy temperature ranged<br />

from 31.13 (ICP 11477) to 39.73 (ICP 8266) with a mean <strong>of</strong> 34.21 0 C. The net photosynthetic<br />

rate ranged from 2.39 (ICP 10710 to 18.97 (ICP 15185) with a mean <strong>of</strong> 8.15 µmolCO2/m 2 /sec.<br />

The stomatal conductance ranged from 0.01 (ICP 7221) to 0.12 (ICP 6929) with an average <strong>of</strong><br />

0.05 mmol H2O/m 2 /sec. The transpiration rate ranged from 0.37 (ICP 7221) to 3.30 (ICP<br />

13577) with an average <strong>of</strong> 1.56 cm/sec. Leaf temperature ranged from 30.82 (ICP 7) to 32.90<br />

(ICP 1156) with a mean <strong>of</strong> 31.96 0 C.<br />

The genotypes ICP4029, ICP11543, ICP6123, ICP11627, ICP14701, ICP14444, ICP12142,<br />

ICP15109, ICP6992 and ICP3451 recorded SPAD values more than 55. Low canopy<br />

Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance<br />

344 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

temperatures (14 µmolCO2/m 2 /sec)<br />

was recorded in genotypes ICP15185, ICP13577, ICP11477, ICP13575, ICP6929, ICP1126,<br />

ICP2698, ICP11321, ICP13579 and ICP6370. The genotypes ICP6929, ICP13577, ICP4029,<br />

ICP348, ICP13579, ICP939, ICP3451, ICP13662, ICP8949, ICP11321, ICP14701 and<br />

ICP4307 recorded the highest stomatal conductance (>0.09 mmol H 2O/m 2 /sec). The Lower<br />

transpiration (


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Gene expressions play a pivotal role in achieving tolerance in plants under salinity stress.<br />

Several genes such as transcription factors, phospholipases, defense-related genes, etc.<br />

including the helicases are known to express under the influence <strong>of</strong> various abiotic stresses.<br />

The helicases are ubiquitous enzymes that catalyze the unwinding <strong>of</strong> DNA duplexes (DNA<br />

helicases) or RNA duplexes (RNA helicases). The constitutive expression <strong>of</strong> such genes can<br />

provide stress tolerance when overexpressed. PDH45, p68 and LecRLK homolog from Pisum<br />

sativum has been reported to provide salinity stress tolerance by overexpression in tobacco and<br />

rice plants (Tuteja et al. 2014; Passricha et al. 2020). RuvB helicase is a highly conserved,<br />

multifunctional, and essential enzyme, primarily involved in numerous mechanisms such as<br />

DNA damage repair, mitotic assembly, switching <strong>of</strong> histone variants, and assembly <strong>of</strong><br />

telomerase core complex. Several studies observed its upregulation in rice under salinity, cold,<br />

and heat stress. The presence <strong>of</strong> unique helicases and the upregulation <strong>of</strong> their transcripts under<br />

abiotic stress conditions suggests their involvement in multiple cellular pathways. The present<br />

study aims to characterize RuvB helicase and identify its potential proteins that might play a<br />

role in imparting tolerance against salt stress in transgenic pigeon peas with the RuvB gene<br />

from Oryza sativa under a constitutive promoter.<br />

Methodology<br />

The sequence <strong>of</strong> the RuvB-like genes from Oryza sativa was retrieved in the FASTA format<br />

from the Rice Annotation Project Database. The Gene Structure Display Server<br />

(http://gsds.gao-lab.org/) and Fegensh+ were used to determine the gene structure. Protein<br />

family, Domain, DNA/RNA/Protein binding sites, and conserved regions were predicted using<br />

CDD, Predictprotein, and Pfam. The Swiss Model was used for structure prediction. QMEAN,<br />

SAVES, molprobity, etc. were further used for structure assessment, optimization, and<br />

verification <strong>of</strong> the predicted models. Interacting protein partners were predicted using the<br />

String database.<br />

Results<br />

The sequence <strong>of</strong> the RuvB-like genes from Oryza sativa with locus ID Os01g0837500 was<br />

retrieved in the FASTA format. Fegensh+ predicted protein coding sequence at the minus<br />

strand. The sequence contains both 3’ and 5’ UTR regions and 14 exons. Heat, cold, and salt<br />

tolerance was associated with trait ontology and the highest expression <strong>of</strong> the gene has been<br />

identified in inflorescence, ovary, and pistil by the RAP-DB. The expression <strong>of</strong> the gene was<br />

also identified in the leaf blade as well as in the endosperm. DNA binding (from amino acid<br />

residues 1-15, 63-67, and 218-224), RNA binding (from amino acid residues 2-13 and 219-<br />

223), and Protein binding (from amino acid residues 9-14, 295-297 and 427-429) sites were<br />

predicted using Predictprotein. The possible role <strong>of</strong> OsRuvb is predicted biological processes<br />

like Organic cyclic compound, cellular aromatic compound, and heterocycle metabolic<br />

Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance<br />

346 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

process. 42.97% <strong>of</strong> the amino acid were predicted as buried by Predictprotein. Conserved<br />

Domain Database (CDD) predicted that OsRuvb protein belongs to AAA+ ATPase family and<br />

TIP49 (TBP interacting) superfamily. Human RuvB-like helicase (PDB-Id: 2C9O) with 99%<br />

query coverage and 73% sequence identity was selected as a template. Swiss model was used<br />

for the homology modeling <strong>of</strong> OsRuvB and the model with minimum energy -13955 KJ and<br />

RMSD <strong>of</strong> 0.134 Angstroms was selected for further studies. OsRuvB’s COGs functional<br />

partners were identified as auxillary units <strong>of</strong> IIF (transcription initiation factor), and Nop<br />

domain <strong>of</strong> Prp31 (RNA processing factor). One <strong>of</strong> the functional partners listed was the stressresponsive<br />

gene 6 protein (Srg6). The COGs also highlighted the possible role <strong>of</strong> OsRuvB in<br />

chromatin remodeling, histone acetyltransferase activity, and methylated histone binding.<br />

Conclusion<br />

OsRuvB is DNA helicase that expresses in the leaf blade vegetative and endosperm, this might<br />

help plant under salt stress during germination as well. The highest expression <strong>of</strong> the gene in<br />

inflorescence, pistil, and ovary lead to higher productivity <strong>of</strong> transgenic pigeon pea. The<br />

possible role <strong>of</strong> OsRuvb is predicted in biological processes like Organic cyclic compounds,<br />

cellular aromatic compounds and heterocycle metabolic processes. OsRuvB’s COGs functional<br />

partners were identified as auxiliary units <strong>of</strong> IIF (transcription initiation factor), and Nop<br />

domain <strong>of</strong> Prp31 (RNA processing factor). This also highlighted the possible role <strong>of</strong> OsRuvB<br />

in chromatin remodeling, histone acetyltransferase activity, and methylated histone binding.<br />

The helicase might have a role in the unwinding <strong>of</strong> DNA for salt-responsive gene 6<br />

transcriptions. The transcriptomics study might shed light on the detailed mechanism for salt<br />

tolerance acquired by the transgenic pigeon pea containing the OsRuvB gene under a<br />

constitutive promoter.<br />

References<br />

FAO. 2020. Food and Agricultural Organisation <strong>of</strong> the United Nation. FAO statistical database.<br />

Tuteja, N., Banu, M. S. A., Huda, K. M. K., Gill, S. S., Jain, P., Pham, X. H., & Tuteja, R.<br />

2014. Pea p68, a DEAD-box helicase, provides salinity stress tolerance in transgenic<br />

tobacco by reducing oxidative stress and improving photosynthesis machinery. PloS one,<br />

9(5), e98287.<br />

Passricha, N., Saifi, S. K., Kharb, P. & Tuteja, N. 2020. Rice lectin receptor-like kinase<br />

provides salinity tolerance by ion homeostasis. Biotechnology and bioengineering,<br />

117(2), 498–510.<br />

347 | Page Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

T3-07R-1040<br />

Performance <strong>of</strong> Tamarind (Tamarindus indica L.) Accessions Under<br />

Dryland Conditions<br />

A.G.K. Reddy, M. Osman, S.K Yadav, N. Jyothi Laxmi, T.V. Prasad, Pushpanjali, K.<br />

Salini, K. Sreedevi Shanker, Vinod Kumar Singh and Jagati Yadagiri<br />

ICAR-Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, Hyderabad-500 059<br />

The purpose <strong>of</strong> this research was to evaluate the performance <strong>of</strong> tamarind (Tamarindus indica<br />

L.) accessions under dryland conditions. Tamarind popularly known as Imli is one <strong>of</strong> the<br />

auspicious, versatile trees in the Indian sub-continent and is particularly abundant in the States<br />

<strong>of</strong> Madhya Pradesh, Bihar, Andhra Pradesh, Telangana, Chhattisgarh, Karnataka, Tamil Nadu<br />

and West Bengal. Tamarind is an important cash crop in India and enjoys t h e sixth position<br />

in terms <strong>of</strong> export earnings. Tamarind tolerates high pH and is well suited to wastelands,<br />

drylands, saline and sodic soils. The trees act as a wind break in many areas and a re also<br />

suitable for drought prone areas. Tamarind thrives in a tropical climate with hot, dry summers<br />

and moderate winters. It can withstand drought but is prone to frost. Tamarind can be grown<br />

in almost all types <strong>of</strong> soil even on poor and margin soils, since; its life-span is long, deep loamy<br />

soils with adequate soil moisture holding capacity is ideal. The objectives <strong>of</strong> the study are (1)<br />

evaluation and characterization <strong>of</strong> tamarind germplasm as per the minimum descriptors (2)<br />

collection <strong>of</strong> tamarind germplasm from Telangana and Bastar plateau and identification <strong>of</strong> elite<br />

material and (3) to study the flowering and fruiting behaviour <strong>of</strong> the tamarind trees with<br />

reference to climatic conditions and soil parameters.<br />

Methodology<br />

The study was conducted at Hayatnagar Research Farm, ICAR-CRIDA Hyderabad from 2020<br />

to 2021 to record the flowering and fruiting characteristics <strong>of</strong> elite genotypes as well as a<br />

quality among the forty tamarind accessions kept at the research farm. The field trial was<br />

established in 1998 and evaluated during the fruiting season <strong>of</strong> 2020-2021 (22years aged<br />

plants). Three replications and 40 genotypes were used for the experiment, which has been<br />

arranged in a randomized block design. At a 5% level <strong>of</strong> probability, the significance <strong>of</strong> the<br />

mean was assessed using the Critical Differences (CD) test (Panse and Sukhatme,1985).<br />

Results<br />

The average number <strong>of</strong> inflorescences per branch Hasanur #5 accession recorded the highest<br />

value <strong>of</strong> 13.87 followed by NZB (S) (12.94), NTI-14 (12.72) and the lowest was noticed in<br />

SMG-7(7.4) followed by Urigam CT 164 (7.62). The average number <strong>of</strong> branches per tree in<br />

Hasanur #5 accession recorded the highest value <strong>of</strong> 6.11 followed by NZB (S) (5.94), Salem<br />

Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance<br />

348 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

132 (5.92) and the lowest was noticed in SMG-7(3.21) followed by Urigam CT 164 (3.57).<br />

Average yield per plant (kg) NZB (S) accession recorded the highest value <strong>of</strong> 15.72 followed<br />

by Hasanur #5 (15.09) and the lowest was noticed in SMG-7 (2.47) followed by NTI-82 (5.74).<br />

The highest pulp weight per fruit was recorded in NZB (S) accessions (9.27 g) followed by<br />

Hasanur #5 (9.24 g). The lowest pulp weight was found in CMK-6 <strong>of</strong> 3.46g followed by<br />

Urigam CT 164 (3.53). Similarly, the highest fibre weight per fruit was recorded in NTI-42<br />

(0.81) followed by Vantoor (0.73) the lowest was noticed in NZB (S) (0.22) followed by Salem<br />

132 (0.24). Regarding seed characters, accession NZB (S) recorded the highest total number <strong>of</strong><br />

seeds per pod (10.78) which was the highest among forty tamarind accessions followed by<br />

Prathistan (10.54). The highest normal number <strong>of</strong> seeds per pod was recorded in NZB (S) (9.38)<br />

followed by Hasanur #5 (10.54) and the lowest was noticed in SMG-4 (4.27) followed by NTI<br />

-86 (4.75). The highest number <strong>of</strong> seeds damaged per pod was recorded in Hyd (local) (1.54)<br />

followed by NTI- 39 (1.53) and the lowest in NZB (S) (0.62) followed by Hasanur #5 (0.82).<br />

Conclusion<br />

Among the forty tamarind accessions evaluated, NZB(S), Hasanur#5, Salem132, NTI-14 and<br />

SMG–3 recorded the highest values in all the growth, pod and yield characters. NZB (S)<br />

recorded the highest number <strong>of</strong> flowers per inflorescence (14.62), Hasanur #5 recorded the<br />

highest number <strong>of</strong> inflorescence per branch (13.87). NZB (S) recorded the highest average fruit<br />

weight (g) (19.24), pulp weight per fruit (g) (9.27), Total seed per Pod (no’s) (10.78), Normal<br />

seed /pod (no’s) (9.38) compare to remaining all tamarind accessions and also NZB (S)<br />

recorded the lowest fibre weight per fruit (g) (0.22), Damaged seed per pod (no’s) (0.62).<br />

References<br />

Panse Vand, Sukhatme, P.V. 1985.Statistical Methods for Agricultural Workers. ICAR, New<br />

Delhi.<br />

T3-08R-1444<br />

Administering the Natural Genetic Diversity for Improving Stress<br />

Tolerance<br />

R.S. Telem 1 , W. Dipin 1 , N. Jyotsna 1 and Romila Akoijam 2<br />

1 Krishi Vigyan Kendra- Senapati, 795129, Manipur, India<br />

2 ICAR- RC for NEH Region, Manipur Centre, 795004, Lamphelpat, Imphal, India<br />

The modern agricultural system <strong>of</strong>ten compromises with the cost <strong>of</strong> biodiversity over the<br />

improvement in yield. This is because the plants have a diverse genetic functions and<br />

regulation systems. During the process <strong>of</strong> the domestication and continuous artificial selection,<br />

genetic variation in the wild cultivars has been vanish in many present-day crop cultivars.<br />

349 | Page Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Breeding <strong>of</strong> crops chosen yield over other attributes such as stress tolerance, which could be<br />

restored under farmers’ supervision and other agricultural methods. Therefore, when compared<br />

to the present-day crop varieties, wild cultivars <strong>of</strong> crops could practically tolerate and survive<br />

under an extensive scale <strong>of</strong> weather variations and unfavorable habitats. Hence, the wild<br />

cultivars <strong>of</strong> different crop plants can be regarded as a principal pool <strong>of</strong> genetic diversity and it<br />

should be given more importance for exploration <strong>of</strong> their stress-tolerant characteristics. Besides<br />

the genetic resources from wild cultivars, genes from diverse plants such as extremophiles,<br />

which are adapted to utmost environmental situations, can also provide a collection for stresstolerant<br />

alleles. Hence, to obtain a more useful understanding <strong>of</strong> stress-tolerant characters<br />

available in naturally occurring stress-resistant plants, further relative studies between the<br />

present-day crops/model plants and crop progenitors/natural accessions/extremophiles are<br />

needed.<br />

Loss <strong>of</strong> stress tolerance during domestication<br />

Domestication <strong>of</strong> crops by artificial selection <strong>of</strong>ten arises in differences to natural selection.<br />

For example, farmers recommend the trait <strong>of</strong> non-shattering seeds, which is obviously a nonrecommendable<br />

character for plants in nature that they require to propagate their <strong>of</strong>fspring. The<br />

breeding plans mostly target to evolve high yielding crop varieties. Thus, domestication has<br />

outcome in growth <strong>of</strong> productivity but restricted genetic diversity, frequently by losing helpful<br />

alleles such as stress-tolerant genes. During domestication procedure, useful characters can be<br />

lost by gene loss, changes in gene regulation, and gene activity modification (i.e., sequence<br />

variations in coding sequence).<br />

Alleles for stress tolerance<br />

Arabidopsis thaliana accessions (ecotypes) are largely dispersed to the different regions <strong>of</strong> the<br />

world, and this dispersal contributes to the genetic diversity <strong>of</strong> Arabidopsis that are pivotal for<br />

stress adaptation. Thus, genetic diversity among the Arabidopsis accessions give a helpful<br />

genetic model to discover both unique stress tolerance mechanisms and important stresstolerant<br />

alleles. For example, Jha et al. found a positive correlation between AtAVP1 transcript<br />

levels and salinity tolerance. In comparison to Col and C24, the Ler and Ws accessions<br />

exhibited higher transcript abundance <strong>of</strong> AtAVP1 in relation with higher salt stress tolerance.<br />

In the first place, rice is a chilling-sensitive crop obtained from tropical or sub-tropical regions<br />

<strong>of</strong> Asia. Rice cultivars comprises two subspecies, indica and japonica. When compared to<br />

indica, the japonica rice cultivars were rated to be more cold-tolerant and grow at higher<br />

altitudes and latitudes and temperate zones. Rice ecotypes include two major types, upland rice<br />

and lowland rice. Lowland rice grows on flooded soils, while upland rice grows on dry soil;<br />

therefore, upland rice cultivars are drought tolerant. In maize, the drought-responsive gene<br />

ZmDREB2.7 shows natural variations in corporation with drought tolerance. The<br />

Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance<br />

350 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

polymorphisms <strong>of</strong> DNA at the 50 untranslated regions <strong>of</strong> ZmDREB2.7 gene were shown to be<br />

essential in controlling the levels <strong>of</strong> drought tolerance in maize varieties.<br />

Polytrichastrum alpinum is a kind <strong>of</strong> polar moss that exist in the utmost environment in the<br />

Antarctic. Hence, a stress-responsive transcriptional co activator gene, multi-protein bridging<br />

factor1c (PaMBF1c), was segregated for comparison with Arabidopsis MBF1c (AtMBF1c).<br />

Earlier, the AtMBF1c gene was already recognised as a key regulator for thermo tolerance<br />

reactions and the AtMBF1c gene over expression improved heat tolerance in Arabidopsis.<br />

Transgenic Arabidopsis plants over expressing the PaMBF1c gene when compared with<br />

AtMBF1c over expressing Arabidopsis lines, both lines showed high tolerance to heat stress.<br />

Conclusion<br />

Of late, many researchers detailed the application <strong>of</strong> the genetic resources from wild crop<br />

progenitors/relatives and extremophiles and authenticated many <strong>of</strong> them to be better alleles<br />

than alleles from model plants in crop improvement against abiotic stresses. Hence, it would<br />

be required to broaden our efforts to realize the natural genetic variations in the wild<br />

progenitors or accessions which are able to adapt in the extreme environments. To know the<br />

significance <strong>of</strong> their stress-eluding strategies will allow us to plan and design the breeding and<br />

biotechnological programs to develop crop plants with varied stress tolerance ability. An<br />

important thing to be noted here is that the natural occurring genetic resources might have not<br />

been selected during domestication process due to its deleterious effects on yield. Therefore,<br />

detailed depiction <strong>of</strong> the “superior” alleles must be executed to avert any compromise <strong>of</strong> yield<br />

in crop improvement.<br />

T3-09R-1356<br />

Effect <strong>of</strong> Different Weed Control Management Practices on Kharif French<br />

Bean<br />

K.A. Chavan*, V. P. Suryavanshi, B. V. Asewar, S. V. Thombre and S. G. Mane<br />

*College <strong>of</strong> agriculture, Latur, Maharashtra, India,<br />

VNMKV Parbhani, Maharashtra, India.<br />

* chavank1903@gmail.com<br />

French bean is short duration high yielding grain legume crop and it can be used both as pulse<br />

and vegetable. French bean is important source <strong>of</strong> protein calories in human diet. It has very<br />

high nutritional value containing 20.69 to 25.81% crude protein, 1.72% fats, 72.42%<br />

carbohydrates and 5.83 mg <strong>of</strong> iron. Among the major constraints, initial heavy infestation <strong>of</strong><br />

weeds is one <strong>of</strong> the important factors, which hinders its overall growth and productivity.<br />

Among the various weed management options herbicide use is not only efficient method but it<br />

351 | Page Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

is cost effective also. On the other hand, physical weed control measure viz. hand weeding are<br />

safe but labour intensive. Therefore, the present investigation on “Integrated weed management<br />

in Kharif French bean (Phaseolus vulgaris)” was undertaken for different weed control<br />

measures and their efficiency and economics in French bean.<br />

Methodology<br />

The field experiment was conducted during kharif 2018-19 at Farm <strong>of</strong> Agronomy section,<br />

College <strong>of</strong> Agriculture, Latur. The soil <strong>of</strong> experimental plot was low in available nitrogen<br />

(129.31 kg ha -1 ), medium in available phosphorus (20.42 kg ha -1 ), high in available potassium<br />

(460.00 kg ha -1 ) and alkaline (pH 8.1) in reaction. The experiment was laid out in Randomised<br />

block design with three replications and variety HPR-35 as a test crop along with seven<br />

treatments viz., T 1-Pendimethalin 30% EC @1.0 kg a.i.ha -1 (PE) , T 2- Quizal<strong>of</strong>op-p-ethyl 5%<br />

EC 100 g a.i. ha -1 at 20 DAS (POE), T3 -Pendimethalin 30% EC @1.0 kg a.i.ha -1 (PE) + One<br />

hoeing at 30 DAS, T 4 - Quizal<strong>of</strong>op-p- ethyl 5% EC 100 g a.i. ha -1 at 20 DAS + One hoeing at<br />

30 DAS, T5 - One hoeing followed by One hand weeding (farmers practice), T6- Weed free<br />

(Three hand weeding), T 7- Weedy check. The effect <strong>of</strong> treatments on yield parameters and<br />

cost economics with respect to French bean.<br />

Results<br />

Yield and economics: The seed yield <strong>of</strong> French bean was differed significantly due to different<br />

weed control treatments. The weed free treatment (T 6 ) recorded higher seed yield (950 kg ha -<br />

1 ) which was at par with treatment Pendimethalin 30% EC @ 1.0 kg a.i.ha -1 (PE) + One hoeing<br />

at 30 DAS (T 3) and Quizal<strong>of</strong>op-p-ethyl 5% EC 100 g a.i. ha -1 at 20 DAS + One hoeing at 30<br />

DAS (T4) and found significantly superior over rest <strong>of</strong> the treatments.<br />

Treatments<br />

T<br />

1<br />

- Pendimethalin 30% EC @1.0 kg a.i.ha -1<br />

(PE)<br />

T<br />

2<br />

- Quizal<strong>of</strong>op-p-ethyl 5% EC 100 g a.i. ha -<br />

1<br />

at 20 DAS (POE)<br />

Yield and economics<br />

Seed yield (kg<br />

ha -1 )<br />

Straw yield<br />

(kg ha -1 )<br />

GMR<br />

(Rs. ha -1 )<br />

NMR<br />

(Rs. ha -1 )<br />

B: C Ratio<br />

760 1956 76000 40845 2.16<br />

732 2161 73166 38167 2.09<br />

T - Pendimethalin 30% EC @1.0 kg a.i.ha -<br />

3<br />

1<br />

(PE) + One hoeing at 30 DAS<br />

T - Quizal<strong>of</strong>op-p- ethyl 5% EC 100 g a.i. ha -<br />

4 1 at 20 DAS + One hoeing at 30 DAS<br />

910 2476 91000 54850 2.52<br />

888 2427 88800 52857 2.47<br />

T - One hoeing followed by One hand<br />

5<br />

774 2048 77400 37643 1.95<br />

weeding (farmer practice)<br />

T - Weed free<br />

6<br />

950 2612 95000 45115 1.90<br />

Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance<br />

352 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

T<br />

7<br />

- Weedy check 559 1840 55900 22622 1.68<br />

S.E.± 37 152 3663 3663 0.10<br />

CD at 5% 113 469 11287 11287 0.31<br />

General Mean 796 2217 79609 41728 2.1<br />

The straw yield (kg ha -1 ) <strong>of</strong> French bean was differed significantly due to different weed<br />

control treatments. The weed free treatment (T 6 ) recorded significantly higher straw yield<br />

(2612 kg ha -1 ) which was at par with treatment Quizal<strong>of</strong>op-p-ethyl 5% EC 100 g a.i. ha -1 at<br />

20 DAS (POE) (T2), Pendimethalin 30% EC @ 1.0 kg a.i. ha -1 (PE) + One hoeing at 30 DAS<br />

(T 3) and Quizal<strong>of</strong>op-p-ethyl 5% EC 100 g a.i. ha -1 at 20 DAS + One hoeing at 30 DAS (T 4)<br />

which was found significantly superior over rest <strong>of</strong> the treatment.<br />

Mean gross monitory return <strong>of</strong> French bean was Rs.79609 ha -1 . The gross monetary return<br />

(Rs ha -1 ) <strong>of</strong> French bean was differed significantly due to different weed control treatments.<br />

The weed free treatment (T 6 ) recorded significantly maximum gross monetary (Rs 950000 ha -<br />

1 ) which was at par with Pendimethalin 30% EC @1.0 kg a.i. ha -1 (PE) + One hoeing at 30 DAS<br />

(T3) and Quizal<strong>of</strong>op-p-ethyl 5% EC 100 g a.i. ha -1 at 20 DAS + One hoeing at 30 DAS (T4)<br />

and found significantly superior over rest <strong>of</strong> the treatments.<br />

The mean net monetary return <strong>of</strong> French bean was Rs. 41728 ha -1 . The net monetary return<br />

was influenced by significantly due to different treatments. The application <strong>of</strong> Pendimethalin<br />

30% EC @1.0 kg a.i.ha -1 (PE) + One hoeing at 30 DAS (T 3) recorded significantly higher net<br />

monetary return Rs.54850 ha - 1 which was at par with Quizal<strong>of</strong>op-p-ethyl 5% EC 100 g a.i. ha -<br />

1<br />

at 20 DAS + One hoeing at 30 DAS (T 4) and weed free treatment (T 6) and found significantly<br />

superior over rest <strong>of</strong> the treatment. The application Pendimethalin 30% EC @ 1.0 kg a.i. ha -1<br />

(PE) + One hoeing at 30 DAS (T3) recorded higher B:C ratio (2.52) <strong>of</strong> French bean which was<br />

closely followed by Quizal<strong>of</strong>op-p-ethyl 5% EC 100 g a.i. ha -1 at 20 DAS + One hoeing at 30<br />

DAS (T 4) with B:C ratio 2.47.<br />

Conclusion<br />

Considering growth, yield, economics, it could be concluded that application <strong>of</strong> Pendimethalin<br />

30% EC @ 1.0 kg a.i. ha -1 (PE) + one hoeing at 30 DAS (T 3) or application <strong>of</strong> Quizal<strong>of</strong>op-pethyl<br />

5% EC @ 100 g a.i. ha -1 at 20DAS + one hoeing at 30 DAS (T4) were more effective in<br />

French bean.<br />

353 | Page Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

T3-10R-1220<br />

Integrated Pest Management Strategies for Fall Army Worm in Southern<br />

Telangana<br />

A. Ramakrishna Babu, Kasthuri Rajamani, P. Archana and M. Goverdan<br />

Regional Agricultural Research Station, Palem-509217, Pr<strong>of</strong>essor Jayashankar Telangana State<br />

Agricultural University, Telangana, India<br />

A recent invasive pest from African countries, the Fall Army Worm (FAW), Spodoptera<br />

frugiperda (J.E. Smith) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) has become a major pest in maize crop,<br />

cultivated across the globe. FAW is a polyphagous species that occurs on over 80 different host<br />

plants with maize as the primary host, and its incidence was reported on maize from Telangana<br />

State during the year 2018-19 (kharif, 3-60% and rabi, 30.8%). The voracious feeding and<br />

long-distance flight behaviors exhibited by the fall armyworm indicated a significant threat to<br />

agriculture with rapid dispersion throughout the hemisphere. The emergence <strong>of</strong> this notorious<br />

pest presents a major challenge to maize farmers, as well as national food security in India.<br />

FAW has the potential to cause yield loss <strong>of</strong> 8.3 to 20.6 M metric tons <strong>of</strong> maize annual<br />

production per year, to minimize these losses and to safeguard the modest gains made in<br />

securing the country’s food production, several actions have been undertaken by both farmers<br />

and scientists. The conventional chemical management strategies are sometimes inconsistent<br />

and <strong>of</strong>ten unsatisfactory to control the pest in maize. The use <strong>of</strong> insecticides as a pest<br />

management tool for small-scale farmers in Mahabubnagar district is more frequent and causes<br />

more damage to the ecosystem. To protect the environment, it is very important to follow<br />

integrated pest management (IPM) packages which are cost-effective for smallholder farmers<br />

in the region. An effective Integrated Pest Management (IPM) strategy for control <strong>of</strong> FAW will<br />

employ a variety <strong>of</strong> integrated approaches including biological control, cultural control, and<br />

safer pesticides, to protect the crop from economic injury while minimizing negative impacts<br />

on people, animals, and the environment. Keeping this in view, the present study was conducted<br />

to popularize IPM measures against FAW at farmers’ fields as Front-Line Demonstrations<br />

(FLD’s) during the kharif and rabi seasons <strong>of</strong> 2019-20 and 2020-21.<br />

Methodology<br />

The present study <strong>of</strong> front-line demonstration <strong>of</strong> integrated pest management <strong>of</strong> fall armyworm<br />

in maize was taken up by District Agricultural Advisory and Transfer <strong>of</strong> Technology Centres<br />

(DAATTCs), Mahabubnagar, Pr<strong>of</strong>essor Jayashankar Telangana State Agricultural University<br />

during kharif and rabi seasons <strong>of</strong> 2019-20 and 2020-21. The total demonstrations were<br />

conducted in seven locations covering seven villages in the Mahabubnagar district. The<br />

farming situation under the study area was sandy to sandy loam with low to medium soil<br />

Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance<br />

354 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

fertility status, besides well-irrigated sources. Further, conducted baseline survey before<br />

grounding the demonstrations to identify the issues related to maize production and also studied<br />

the socio-economic status <strong>of</strong> adopted farmers. The front-line demonstrations on Integrated Pest<br />

Management <strong>of</strong> fall armyworm in maize comprised cultural, mechanical, and chemical<br />

methods. At each location, the demonstration was laid out in an area <strong>of</strong> 0.4 ha and adjacent 0.4<br />

ha was considered as control (farmers’ practice) for comparison studies. Apart from<br />

showcasing the viability <strong>of</strong> pest management components, farmers were also sensitized on the<br />

relevance <strong>of</strong> these technologies by organizing awareness programs, focused group discussions,<br />

conducting method demonstrations and training programs.<br />

Results<br />

The results <strong>of</strong> front-line demonstrations on integrated pest management <strong>of</strong> fall armyworm in<br />

maize (Table 1 and 2) indicated that the pest incidence and damage due to FAW range was 8.4-<br />

14.0 percent in IPM followed plots during kharif 2019-20, whereas the average pest incidence<br />

was 11.44 percent. In the Non-IPM plots, it was found that the pest incidence ranged from 28.6<br />

to 36.4 percent and the average pest incidence was 32.6 percent. During rabi 2020-21, the FAW<br />

damage was very less compared to kharif season, and the damage range was 3.3 – 10.0 percent<br />

in IPM followed plots, whereas the average pest incidence was 6.98 percent. The Non-IPM<br />

plots showed that the pest incidence ranged from 13.3 to 23.1 percent, with an average pest<br />

incidence <strong>of</strong> 16.6 percent.<br />

Influence <strong>of</strong> FAW on maize yield and incidence during kharif, 2019-20<br />

S.No. Name Village / Manda; Yield<br />

(kg/ha)<br />

COC (Rs/ha) Gross returns B.C Ratio Pest incidence<br />

1. Mahipal Reddy Gurkunta<br />

/Nawabpet<br />

2. P.Shankaraiah Karkonda<br />

/Nawabpet<br />

3. Kosgi Chandraiah Nainonipalli/<br />

Nawabpet<br />

4 K.Anantaiah Venkatreddypalli<br />

/Gandeed<br />

Check Demo Check Demo Check Demo Check Demo Check Demo<br />

4725 4950<br />

(4.76%)<br />

4500 5125<br />

(13.89%)<br />

4875 5375<br />

(10.26%)<br />

5375 5775<br />

(7.44%)<br />

45500 38750 94500 99000 2.07 2.55 Moderate to<br />

severe,<br />

48000 47950 90000 125000 1.87 2.60 High<br />

incidence <strong>of</strong><br />

FAW<br />

57500 51250 80194 88419 1.39 1.72 High<br />

incidence <strong>of</strong><br />

FAW<br />

58750 55000 86000 92400 1.46 1.68 Severe<br />

incidence<br />

Average 4869 5306 52438 48238 87674 101205 2.58 2.23<br />

Low<br />

FAW<br />

FAW<br />

controlle<br />

d<br />

FAW<br />

controlle<br />

d<br />

FAW<br />

controlle<br />

d<br />

355 | Page Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

S.<br />

No<br />

Name<br />

1. Sudhaker<br />

Reddy<br />

2. Rajeshwar<br />

Reddy<br />

Influence <strong>of</strong> FAW on maize yield and incidence during rabi, 2020-21<br />

Village<br />

/Mandal<br />

Tirumalagiri<br />

/ gandeed<br />

Machanpally/<br />

mahabubnagar<br />

Yield<br />

(kg/ha)<br />

COC<br />

(Rs/ha)<br />

Gross returns B.C Ratio Pest incidence<br />

Demo Check Demo Check Demo Check Demo Check Demo Check<br />

5000<br />

(17.65%)<br />

5000<br />

(11.11%)<br />

3. Venkataih Buddaram /Hanwada 3250<br />

(8.33%)<br />

4250 62500 45000 88000 57200 1.40 1.27 Effectively<br />

controlled<br />

4500 50000 40000 88000 61600 1.76 1.54 Effectively<br />

controlled<br />

3000 45000 40000 52000 48000 1.15 1.2 Moderately<br />

controlled<br />

Average 4416 3250 52500 41666. 76000 55600 1.44 1.33<br />

Moderate to<br />

severe<br />

High incidence<br />

<strong>of</strong> FAW<br />

High incidence<br />

<strong>of</strong> FAW<br />

The data revealed yield differences among IPM strategies and Non-IPM practices on integrated<br />

pest management <strong>of</strong> fall armyworm in maize at farmers’ fields <strong>of</strong> Mahabubnagar district. The<br />

percent increase in yield in all the demonstration locations over farmers’ practice ranged from<br />

4.76 to 13.89 during kharif 2019-20, whereas the percent increase in yield varied 8.33 to 17.65<br />

percent rabi 2020-21 with the highest being recorded during rabi, compared to kharif season.<br />

There was an average yield increase <strong>of</strong> 9.09 and 12.36 percent during kharif 2019-20 and rabi<br />

2020-21, which clearly indicated that the adoption <strong>of</strong> IPM technology against fall armyworm<br />

in maize had a pr<strong>of</strong>ound influence on yield in both seasons. Lavakumar et al., (2019) reported<br />

from the southern part <strong>of</strong> Telangana has a substantial increase in maize grain production<br />

following the adoption <strong>of</strong> IPM protocol against fall armyworm. Thus cultivation <strong>of</strong> maize by<br />

IPM module is found economically prudent to suppress Spodoptera frugiperda (J.E. Smith)<br />

(Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) incidence to boost production.<br />

References<br />

Lavakumar, M., Omprakash, S., Rajinikanth, E., Saicharan, M., Lakshmisoujanya P. and<br />

Mallaiah, B. 2019. Management <strong>of</strong> Fall Army Worm on Maize in the State <strong>of</strong><br />

Telangana-An IPM Strategy Recommended. Trends in Biosciences 12(22), 1418-1421.<br />

Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance<br />

356 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

T3-11R-1009<br />

Performance <strong>of</strong> Pigeonpea (BDN 711) Under Rainfed Condition in Beed<br />

District <strong>of</strong> Maharashtra<br />

H.S. Garud 1 *, B.B. Gaikwad 2 , T.B. Surpam 2 and D.C. Patgaonkar 2<br />

1 Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Khamgaon Ta. Georai Dist. Beed<br />

Vasantrao Naik Marathwada Krishi Vidyapeeth, Parbhani 431 402 (MS), India<br />

*garudhanuman@gmail.com<br />

In India, particularly in Maharashtra region, for last few decades is facing severe problems <strong>of</strong><br />

drought due to vagaries <strong>of</strong> monsoon like late onset, early withdrawal, prolonged dry spell<br />

between two rains etc. As a result <strong>of</strong> this, crop failure due to lack <strong>of</strong> water availability has<br />

become a common phenomenon. Though pigeonpea is widely grown in Beed district, various<br />

factors influence the potential yield <strong>of</strong> the crop such as, faulty sowing practices, and lack <strong>of</strong><br />

knowledge about high yielding and disease resistant varieties. Lack <strong>of</strong> awareness about seed<br />

treatment with bi<strong>of</strong>ertilizers Rhizobium, PSB, Trichoderma viridae and improper management<br />

<strong>of</strong> pod borer. Above all in the district predominantly noticed problems for pigeonpea<br />

cultivation are high incidence <strong>of</strong> wilt and terminal drought condition. Hence drought tolerant<br />

variety appears to be major challenge to increasing productivity. With this background, Front<br />

line demonstrations were conducted to show the worth <strong>of</strong> high yielding and drought tolerant<br />

BDN 711 improved variety <strong>of</strong> pigeonpea.<br />

Methodology<br />

Technology demonstration on pigeonpea variety BDN 711 was conducted by Krishi Vigyan<br />

Kendra, Khamgaon during 2019-20, 2020-21 and 2021-22 in the district <strong>of</strong> Beed. A total 50<br />

number <strong>of</strong> demonstration was conducted in 20 ha area each year. In general, the soil <strong>of</strong> the area<br />

under study is medium to heavy and medium in fertility status. The component demonstration<br />

technology in pigeonpea was comprised i.e. university recommended improved variety BDN<br />

711 which was medium duration, escaping terminal drought and wilt resistant. In the<br />

demonstration, one control plot was also kept where farmer's practices were carried out. The<br />

demonstration was conducted to study the technology gap between the potential yield and<br />

demonstrated yield, the extension gap between demonstrated yield and yield under existing<br />

practice and the technology index. The yield data were collected from both the demonstration<br />

and farmer's practice by random crop cutting method and analyzed by using simple statistical<br />

tools. The percent increase yield, technology gap, extension gap and technology index were<br />

calculated by using the following formula as per Samui et al. (2000) as given below-<br />

Percent increase in yield =<br />

Demonstration yield – Farmers practice yield<br />

Farmers practice yield<br />

X 100<br />

357 | Page Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Technology gap = Potential yield - Demonstration yield<br />

Extension gap = Demonstration yield –Farmers practice plot yield<br />

Results<br />

Technology index (%) =<br />

Technology gap<br />

Potential yield X100<br />

Frontline demonstration studies were carried out in Beed district <strong>of</strong> Maharashtra state in<br />

kharifseason <strong>of</strong>2019-20 to 2021-22. The results revealed that in the demonstration on<br />

pigeonpea an average seed yield recorded 1660 kg ha -1 under demonstrated plots as compared<br />

to farmer's practice 1267 kg ha -1 . The highest seed yield in the demonstration plot was 1800 kg<br />

ha -1 during 2021-22. The average yield <strong>of</strong> pigeonpea increased by 31.11 per cent. These results<br />

indicated that the higher average seed yield in demonstration plots compared to farmer's<br />

practice due to integrated crop management practices and awareness <strong>of</strong> drought resistance <strong>of</strong><br />

BDN 711 variety.<br />

The extension gap observed during different years was 280, 350 and 550 kg ha -1 during 2019-<br />

20, 2020-21 and 2021-22 respectively. On an average, the extension gap observed in three<br />

years under FLD implemented villages was 393 kg ha -1 . The highest extension gap 550 kg ha -<br />

1<br />

was recorded in 2021-22 followed by 350 kg ha -1 (2020-21) and 280 kg ha -1 (2019-20). The<br />

technology gap observed during different years was 770, 450 and 400 kg ha -1 during 2019-20,<br />

2020-21 and 2021-22 respectively. On an average, the technology gap observed in three years<br />

under FLD implemented villages was 540 kg ha -1 . The highest technology gap 770 kg ha -1 was<br />

recorded in 2019-20 followed by 450 kg ha -1 (2020-21) and 280 kg ha -1 (2021-22).<br />

On an average, the technology index observed was 25.74 % for three years where front-line<br />

demonstrations were conducted. This shows the efficiency and effectiveness <strong>of</strong> the improved<br />

technologies. The cultivation <strong>of</strong> pigeonpea under improved technologies FLD gave higher net<br />

returns <strong>of</strong> Rs.57500, Rs. 78000 and Rs. 76400 per hectare as against to farmer's practices i.e.,<br />

Rs. 35500, Rs. 60800 and Rs 48750 per hectare during the years 2019-20, 2020-21 and 2021-<br />

22 respectively. The B:C ratio <strong>of</strong> pigeonpea observed during different years 2019-20, 2020-21<br />

and 2021-22 under improved cultivation practices were 1.90, 2.33 and 3.06 respectively while<br />

it was 1.61, 1.95 and 2.62under farmer's practice for the respective years. The highest B:C ratio<br />

in demo plots is because <strong>of</strong> higher yields obtained under improved technologies compared to<br />

farmer's practices during all three years.<br />

Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance<br />

358 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Yield, technology gap, extension gap and technology index in pigeonpea cultivation<br />

during 2019-20, 2020-21 and 2021-22.<br />

Year<br />

Potential<br />

yield (kg<br />

ha -1 )<br />

Average seed yield<br />

(kg ha -1 )<br />

Demo<br />

Farmers<br />

Practice<br />

Percent<br />

increase<br />

Technology<br />

gap (kg ha -1 )<br />

Extensio<br />

n gap<br />

(kg ha -1 )<br />

Technology<br />

index (%)<br />

2019-20 2200 1430 1150 24.34 770 280 35.00<br />

2020-21 2200 1750 1400 25.00 450 350 20.00<br />

2021-22 2200 1800 1250 44.00 400 550 22.22<br />

Mean 2200 1660 1267 31.11 540 393 25.74<br />

Economic impact <strong>of</strong> pigeonpea cultivated under FLD and Farmers' practice during<br />

2019-20, 2020-21 and 2021-22.<br />

Year<br />

No. <strong>of</strong><br />

Demo<br />

Area<br />

(ha)<br />

Gross income<br />

(Rs. ha -1 )<br />

Demo<br />

Farmers<br />

Practice<br />

Demo<br />

Net income<br />

(Rs. ha -1 )<br />

Farmers<br />

Practice<br />

Demo<br />

B: C Ratio<br />

Farmers<br />

Practice<br />

2019-20 50 20 75500 49500 57500 35500 1.90 1.61<br />

2020-21 50 20 105000 85800 78000 60800 2.33 1.95<br />

2021-22 50 20 113400 78750 76400 48750 3.06 2.62<br />

Mean 50 20 97967 71350 70633 48350 2.43 2.06<br />

Conclusion<br />

Pigeonpea variety BDN 711 gave higher seed yield, gross monetary returns, net monetary<br />

returns and B: C ratio under rainfed conditions over farmer's practice.<br />

References<br />

Samui, S.K., Maitra, S., Roy, D.K., Mandal, A.K., Saha, D. 2000. Evaluation <strong>of</strong> frontline<br />

demonstration on groundnut. J. Indian Society Costal Agricultural Research. 18<br />

(2):180-183.<br />

359 | Page Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

T3-11aR-1263<br />

Isolation and Quantitative Screening <strong>of</strong> Potential Fungal Isolates for<br />

Cellulase Activity<br />

Savitha Santosh 2 , Diksha Ramteke 1 , K. Velmourougane 1 , D. Blaise 1 , V. K. Singh 2<br />

1 ICAR – Central Institute for Cotton Research, Nagpur 440010<br />

2 ICAR-Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, Hyderabad 500059<br />

* savitha.santosh@icar.gov.in<br />

Plant biomass is an abundant renewable natural resource that can be transformed into chemical<br />

feedstocks and mostly made up <strong>of</strong> hemicelluloses, cellulose, lignin and a small amount <strong>of</strong><br />

protein and pectin depending on the source (Xu et al., 2018). Many microorganisms are capable<br />

<strong>of</strong> degrading and utilizing cellulose and hemicellulose as carbon and energy sources. The fungi<br />

represent the predominant group <strong>of</strong> organisms responsible for lignocelluloses degradation.<br />

Fungi have two types <strong>of</strong> extracellular enzymatic systems: the hydrolytic system, which<br />

produces hydrolases that are responsible for polysaccharide degradation; and a unique<br />

oxidative and extracellular ligninolytic system, which degrades lignin and opens phenyl rings.<br />

The cellulases are enzymes produced by cellulolytic microorganisms, which are essential for<br />

releasing fermentable sugars from lignocellulosic biomass. Enzymatic saccharification <strong>of</strong><br />

natural lignocellulose is required, and the use <strong>of</strong> cellulose-degrading enzymes becomes crucial<br />

when working with lignocellulosic substrates (Zhang et al., 2021). Endoglucanases (CMCase),<br />

exoglucanases (FPase), and β-glucosidases are the most relevant enzymes for cellulose<br />

degradation. Therefore, this study was carried out with an aim to isolate and quantify cellulase<br />

activity <strong>of</strong> potential fungal isolates.<br />

Methodology<br />

The soil samples were collected from seven different locations <strong>of</strong> Nagpur district, Maharashtra.<br />

The isolation <strong>of</strong> fungi was carried out by serial dilution and colonies growing over the medium<br />

were observed for their morphological characteristics and identified. The isolates were<br />

subjected to quantitative screening in submerged cultivations in Erlenmeyer flasks containing<br />

50 ml <strong>of</strong> basal medium [1.4 g/L (NH 4) 2SO 4, 2.0 g/L KH 2PO 4, 0.4 g/L CaCl 2, 0.3 g/L MgSO 4,<br />

1.56 mg/L MnSO 4.H 2O, 5.0 mg/L FeSO 4.7H 2O, 1.4 mg/L ZnSO 4.7H 2O and 2.0 mg/L CoCl 2<br />

containing 10.0 g/l <strong>of</strong> CMC (pH 5.0)]. After sterilization <strong>of</strong> the basal medium, the flasks were<br />

incubated with plugs (5 mm diameter) and the fungal mycelia were grown on medium and<br />

incubated at 30°C with shaking at 150 rpm. The crude enzyme was collected at different<br />

incubation days (7,14 and 21) using centrifugation at 10,000 rpm and 4°C for 15 min and<br />

analysed for Endoglucanase (CMCase), Exoglucanase (FPase) and β- glucosidase activity<br />

(Namnuch et al., 2021).<br />

Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance<br />

360 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Results<br />

The four fungal isolates (T1, T2, Bb1 and TV1) were isolated which produced cellulolytic<br />

enzymes in different quantities in Table. The T 1 isolate was the one with highest CMCase<br />

enzyme activity with 35.122 IU/ml after 21 days <strong>of</strong> incubation on the other hand, 19.36 IU/ml<br />

was observed for TV1 after 21 days <strong>of</strong> incubation which is least among all. With respect to β-<br />

glucosidase activity, T1 isolate produced highest enzyme activity (44.0 IU/ml). In case <strong>of</strong><br />

FPase activity, T 1 showed 27.7 IU/ml after 21 days <strong>of</strong> incubation enzymatic activity, being the<br />

best and Bb1 showed the least productivity <strong>of</strong> 20.4 IU/ml after 21 days <strong>of</strong> incubation.<br />

Cellulolytic activity <strong>of</strong> potential fungal isolates<br />

CMCase (IU/ml) Β-Glucosidase (IU/ml) FPase (IU/ml)<br />

7 days 14Days 21Days 7 days 14Days 21Days 7 days 14Days 21Days<br />

T1 2.303 7.557 35.122 40.8 73.6 44.0 23.6 25.6 27.7<br />

T2 1.822 6.447 19.360 22.9 33.5 24.0 12.5 22.7 23.1<br />

Bb1 2.858 2.081 31.422 9.2 10.4 11.5 4.7 11.7 20.4<br />

TV1 1.378 18.398 27.093 19.8 36.3 23.6 25.6 25.7 24.7<br />

Control 0.971 0.971 0.601 2.6 3.3 3.4 4.0 2.4 2.6<br />

Conclusion<br />

The fungal isolates have an enormous potential for utilization <strong>of</strong> cellulosic substrates, as they<br />

are the major group <strong>of</strong> microorganisms capable <strong>of</strong> synthesizing enzymes to degrade these<br />

substrates. The fungal isolates identified in the study would be valuable for effective cellulose<br />

degradation.<br />

References<br />

Namnuch, N., Thammasittirong, A. and Thammasittirong, S.N.R., 2021. Lignocellulose<br />

hydrolytic enzymes production by Aspergillus flavus KUB2 using submerged<br />

fermentation <strong>of</strong> sugarcane bagasse waste. Mycology, 12(2):119-127.<br />

Xu, R., Zhang, K., Liu, P., Han, H., Zhao, S., Kakade, A., Khan, A., Du, D., Li, X., 2018.<br />

Lignin depolymerization and utilization by bacteria. Bioresour. Technol., 269: 557–<br />

566.<br />

Zhang, Z., Shah, A.M., Mohamed, H., Tsiklauri, N. and Song, Y., 2021. Isolation and<br />

Screening <strong>of</strong> Microorganisms for the Effective Pretreatment <strong>of</strong> Lignocellulosic<br />

Agricultural Wastes. BioMed Res. Int., 2021: 514745.<br />

361 | Page Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

T3-12P-1433<br />

Yellow Revolution Success in Sodic Soil Through Salt Resistant Variety <strong>of</strong><br />

Mustard (CS-58)<br />

A.K. Srivastava, Naveen K. Singh and Ashutosh Srivastava<br />

Krishi Vigyan Kendra Pratapgarh- 229408, Uttar Pradesh, India<br />

Salinity and sodicity stresses affect an area <strong>of</strong> 932.2 million hectares in the world and an area<br />

<strong>of</strong> nearly 6.73 million hectares is affected by these stresses in India. This crop is <strong>of</strong>ten subject<br />

to saline stress, as it is grown extensively in arid and semi-arid regions <strong>of</strong> the world. Soil and<br />

water salinity stresses contribute to greater yield losses (both seed and oil yield), and this low<br />

economic yield is related to susceptibility <strong>of</strong> the crop. Hence, it is necessary to develop salttolerant<br />

genotypes in Indian mustard. CS-58 is a newly developed, salt-tolerant, high-yielding<br />

Indian mustard variety from ICAR- CSSRI, Karnal, to harness the yield potential <strong>of</strong> saltaffected<br />

soils <strong>of</strong> India. It produced 24-25% higher seed yield than the national check varieties<br />

Varuna and Kranti and was adopted by farmers in salt-affected areas. It grows up to a height<br />

<strong>of</strong> 180-185 cm. It matures in about 125-130 days and 1000 seed weight was 5.6-6.0 g. It is<br />

recommended for saline soils up to soil salinity level (ECe) up to 12.0 dS m -1 and in alkali soils<br />

upto pH 8.5-9.3. It is highly suitable for saline and sodic soil conditions. It yields around 39%<br />

oil content even under salt stress conditions. The yield potential in normal soils is 26-28 q ha -1<br />

and in salt affected soils (having pH up to 9.3 and soil salinity upto 9.0 dS m -1 ) is 22-24 q ha -1 .<br />

In NICRA village on the basis <strong>of</strong> five-year (2015-16 to 2020-21) demonstration conducted for<br />

saline conditions in NICRA village Chhachhamau, CS-58 provided a mean seed average yield<br />

<strong>of</strong> 2040 kg ha -1 under sodic condition (pH 8.5-9.0), which was 22-26% higher than the yields<br />

<strong>of</strong> check variety Varua. It gives higher yield at less cost, with less water requirements, and with<br />

more resilience to climatic stresses – are desirable and should be evaluated. Introduction <strong>of</strong><br />

mustard salt tolerant variety CS-58 plays a significant role in high pH condition.<br />

T3-13P-1253<br />

Weed Management Strategies under Different Tillage Systems in Wet<br />

Direct Seeded Rice<br />

P. Gayathri, Nimmy Jose, Jyothi Sara Jacob, A.K. Ambily and M. Surendran<br />

Rice Research Station, Moncompu, Kerala Agricultural University, 688502, Kerala, India<br />

The shift in the crop establishment method from transplanting to direct sowing is not gaining<br />

momentum among farming community due to the difficulties associated with the weed<br />

management in wet direct seeded rice (DSR). In wet DSR, weeds and seeds emerge at the same<br />

time and cause severe yield loss. As no weedicides can give broad spectrum management,<br />

Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance<br />

362 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

integration <strong>of</strong> cultural and chemical methods is required for effective management <strong>of</strong> weeds<br />

especially sedges in wet DSR. Conservation agriculture is a machine, herbicide and<br />

management driven agriculture with integrated weed management involving chemical and nonchemical<br />

methods for its success in the long-run (Sharma et al., 2014). In addressing weed<br />

control challenges, studies have shown that minimum and no-tillage reduce the weed<br />

population and also provide other ecosystem services like sustainable land management,<br />

environmental protection and climate change adaptation and mitigation (Sims et al., 2018).<br />

Unless weed management is sustainably addressed in conservation agriculture, particularly in<br />

the initial years, weed pressure, weed resistance and inherent crop yield losses may deter<br />

farmers from adopting conservation practices. With this background, this study was conducted<br />

to evaluate integrated weed management options for the effective management <strong>of</strong> weeds in<br />

rice, especially sedges which have become difficult to control in DSR.<br />

Methodology<br />

The experiment was conducted at Rice Research Station, Moncompu, Kerala Agricultural<br />

University, during the rabi 2021 -22 and kharif 2022, in split plot design with three main plots<br />

and five sub plots. The main plots were different land preparation practices viz., zero tillage<br />

followed by stale seed bed technique (SSB) and herbicide application to destroy the germinated<br />

weeds, tillage followed by SSB technique and herbicide application to destroy the germinated<br />

weeds, and tillage followed by SSB technique and destroying the germinated weeds again by<br />

tillage (repeated tillage). In the sub plots, various herbicides were evaluated for its effectiveness<br />

under different tillage conditions, viz., pre-emergence application <strong>of</strong> Pyrazosulfuron @ 0.02 kg<br />

ai/ha followed by post-emergence application <strong>of</strong> Penoxulam + Cyhal<strong>of</strong>op butyl @ 0.135 kg<br />

ai/ha, post-emergence application <strong>of</strong> Fenoxaprop ethyl @ 0.06 kg ai/ha followed by<br />

Metsulfuron methyl + Chlorimuron ethyl @ 0.004 kg ai/ha, post-emergence application <strong>of</strong><br />

Fenoxaprop ethyl @ 0.06 kg ai/ha followed by 2,4-D @ 1.00 kg ai/ha, two hand weedings and<br />

weedy check. The most popular rice variety <strong>of</strong> the region, Uma (MO 16) was used in the<br />

experiment. Observations on plant height, plant population, tiller count, total dry matter<br />

production, weed count and weed dry weight was recorded at 15, 30, 60, 80 and 110 DAS <strong>of</strong><br />

the crop. Grain and straw yield were also recorded at harvest.<br />

Results<br />

The results revealed that at 15 DAS, main plots, where land preparation was done by zero<br />

tillage followed by SSB with application <strong>of</strong> broad-spectrum herbicide to destroy the germinated<br />

weeds had significantly lower weed population followed by plots where land preparation was<br />

done by tillage followed by SSB with application <strong>of</strong> broad-spectrum herbicide. Significantly<br />

higher weed population was noticed in the treatment with tillage followed by SSB technique<br />

and destroying the germinated weeds by tillage (repeated tillage). At 30 DAS, plots where land<br />

363 | Page Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

was prepared by tillage followed by SSB with application <strong>of</strong> broad-spectrum herbicide had<br />

significantly lower weed population followed by zero tilled plots. Increase in weed population<br />

at 30 DAS in zero tilled plots compared to that at 15 DAS may be due to the increase in the<br />

germination <strong>of</strong> grass weeds from the soil surface, which is a problem in conservation<br />

agriculture. Species wise observation on weeds at 30 DAS clearly revealed the significantly<br />

higher populations <strong>of</strong> grass weeds in zero tilled plots followed by plots with repeated tillage<br />

and herbicide application. Giller et al., (2009) reported that small-seeded weeds that require<br />

light to break dormancy will likely become the dominant weed species in minimum and notillage<br />

systems, including in the first years <strong>of</strong> adoption <strong>of</strong> conservation agriculture. Population<br />

<strong>of</strong> broad-leaved weeds and sedges were significantly higher in repeated tillage than zero tilled<br />

plots both at 15 and 30 DAS. Repeatedly tilled plots recorded significantly higher total weed<br />

dry weight at 60 DAS.<br />

Various weed management strategies were adopted in the sub plots considering the severe<br />

infestation <strong>of</strong> weeds viz., Fimbristylis, Cyperus, Leptochloa, Echinochloa, Isachne,<br />

Monochoria, Lindernia and Ludwigia. Pre-emergence application <strong>of</strong> Pyrazosulfuron @ 0.02<br />

kg ai/ha at 3-5 DAS resulted in significantly lower weed population at 15 DAS in all sub plots<br />

irrespective <strong>of</strong> the main plots. Application <strong>of</strong> pre-emergent herbicide reduced the weed<br />

population by 70% compared to weedy check at 15 DAS. Singh et al. (2009) reported that<br />

application <strong>of</strong> pre and post–emergent herbicides is an effective solution for weed control in<br />

zero-tilled DSR either with residue or cover crops as it produced statistically similar yield to<br />

the puddled transplanted rice. At 30 DAS, weed population in all herbicide applied plots were<br />

on par with that <strong>of</strong> hand weeded plots. Total weed dry weight at 60 DAS in all the sub plots<br />

with herbicides were on par and significantly higher than hand weeding. In all the herbicide<br />

combinations evaluated, it was observed that sedges were the difficult-to-control weeds<br />

compared to broad leaved and grass weeds. There was 40% reduction in the total weed dry<br />

weight in the weedy check plots with zero tillage compared to that in repeated tillage which<br />

reveals the advantage <strong>of</strong> zero tillage in preventing weed seed germination.<br />

The interaction <strong>of</strong> main plot treatment with sub plots was also observed to be significant for<br />

various parameters under study. Comparison <strong>of</strong> yield in the different main plot treatments<br />

revealed superiority <strong>of</strong> zero tillage. Yield obtained in zero tilled plots was significantly higher<br />

than that in repeatedly tilled plots (tillage both at land preparation and after SSB). Eventhough<br />

the yield obtained from zero tilled plots was on par with plots with tillage (only at land<br />

preparation), significantly lower weed population in zero tilled plots will contribute to less soil<br />

seed bank enrichment than repeated tillage, which will be observed only after two or three<br />

cropping seasons. In all the main plots, the sub plots with pre-emergent herbicide application<br />

followed by post-emergent application gave significantly superior yield. This yield advantage<br />

Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance<br />

364 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

may be due initial reduction in weed population on application <strong>of</strong> pre-emergent herbicide<br />

compared to various combinations <strong>of</strong> post-emergent herbicides alone.<br />

Conclusion<br />

Land preparation with zero tillage followed by stale seed bed with the application <strong>of</strong> broadspectrum<br />

herbicide reduced the weed population by 40 per cent. Yield obtained in zero tilled<br />

plots was significantly higher than that in repeatedly tilled plots. Weeds during the crop season<br />

in the zero tilled field can be effectively managed by application <strong>of</strong> pre-emergent herbicide<br />

Pyrazosulfuron @ 0.02 kg ai/ha at 3-5 DAS followed by post-emergent herbicide Penoxulam<br />

+ Cyhal<strong>of</strong>op butyl @ 0.135 kg ai/ha at 18-20 DAS.<br />

References<br />

Giller K E.,Witter E., Corbeels M and Tittonell, P. 2009. Conservation agriculture and<br />

smallholder farming in Africa: The heretics’ view. Field Crops Res., 114: 23–34.<br />

Sharma A R., and Singh V P. 2014. Integrated weed management in conservation agriculture<br />

systems. Indian J. Weed Sci., 46(1): 23–30.<br />

Sims B., Corsi S., Gbehounou G., Kienzle J., Taguchi M. and Friedrich T. 2018. Sustainable<br />

Weed Management for Conservation Agriculture: Options for Smallholder Farmers.<br />

Agriculture. 8(8):118.<br />

T3-14P-1485<br />

Screening Potato Varieties and Advanced Clones for Maximizing Organic<br />

Tuber Productivity<br />

Pooja Mankar, Sanjay Rawal, S.K. Luthra, V.K. Gupta and Manoj Kumar<br />

ICAR- Central Potato Research Institute, Regional Station, Modipuram,<br />

Meerut (UP)-250110 India<br />

Potato is the fourth most important crop in world after rice, wheat, and maize, and is a major<br />

food crop which is consumed by over a billion people. It is identified as the future food and<br />

has immense potential for global as well as national food and nutritional food security. Potato<br />

production, area, and yield have increased by 34, 9.3, and 3.7 times, respectively over the past<br />

seven decades in the country. Now, India holds second position in potato production at global<br />

level as third advance estimate <strong>of</strong> 2021-22 has estimated that total production, area, and<br />

productivity <strong>of</strong> potato is around 54.2 m tonnes, 2.24 m ha and 2.4 t/ha, respectively<br />

(Anonymous, 2022). The prevailing domestic scenario <strong>of</strong> this crop requires diversified<br />

production strategy and further utilization in the national and international markets. One way<br />

may be organic potato cultivation which has good avenues for domestic and export markets.<br />

365 | Page Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Organic farming has gained significant attention and is developing as a dynamic ‘Alternate<br />

Farming System’. Key objective <strong>of</strong> organic production system is quality food production for<br />

humans and animals, while maintaining ecological balance and economic viability. Safety,<br />

protection, and conservation <strong>of</strong> the environment are the need <strong>of</strong> hour and organic cultivation<br />

practices ensure this. It is becoming popular in domestic and international markets as<br />

consumers are becoming more serious about food quality, especially chemical residues. This<br />

awareness and demand for quality food have created new market opportunities for farmers with<br />

premium selling prices and potato is no exception to all these trends. To meet the future<br />

challenges <strong>of</strong> increasing food demand, while simultaneously decreasing its environmental<br />

impact, efforts on increasing the performance <strong>of</strong> organic production systems, e.g., improving<br />

nutrient use efficiency are necessary. One <strong>of</strong> the major hurdles in organic potato production is<br />

the choice <strong>of</strong> variety as this is the major yield limiting factor. As per the National Standards for<br />

Organic Production (NSOP) norms, species and varieties cultivated under organic farming<br />

should be adapted to local soil and climatic conditions and should be resistant to pests and<br />

diseases. Genetic diversity should be taken into consideration while choosing a variety <strong>of</strong> crops<br />

to be taken in organic cultivation. Therefore, identification and development <strong>of</strong> varieties would<br />

play a very significant role in this direction. With this background, field experiments were<br />

conducted to screen the advanced clones better than newly released popular varieties for<br />

harnessing the potential <strong>of</strong> this crop in organic nutrition and have tuber yields comparable to<br />

the conventional inorganic system.<br />

Methodology<br />

Eighty-four advanced clones and varieties were evaluated in sandy loam soils <strong>of</strong> ICAR-CPRI<br />

RS, Modipuram research farm during 2019-21 in randomized block design having three<br />

replications. Potential genotypes were selected based on their productivity under organic<br />

nutrition and percent yield maintenance while comparing with the conventional inorganic<br />

system. These were evaluated in the field during subsequent crop seasons for their suitability<br />

under organic nutrition. Recommended packages <strong>of</strong> practices as per NPOP norms were<br />

followed for these genotypes to raise a successful crop. Planting was done in the last week <strong>of</strong><br />

October and the haulm cutting date varied due to different maturity periods (80-110 days) <strong>of</strong><br />

different genotypes. All observations related to emergence, growth and productivity were<br />

recorded as per the schedule during the crop season. Tuber harvesting and grading were done<br />

manually, and tubers <strong>of</strong> >20 mm size were considered marketable. Data from two crop seasons<br />

were pooled and analyzed using IRRISTAT statistical s<strong>of</strong>tware and inferences were drawn<br />

(IRRI, 1999).<br />

Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance<br />

366 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Results<br />

The marketable and total tuber number (000 ha -1 ) had significant variations among different<br />

genotypes, and also due to the source <strong>of</strong> nutrition. Interactions were also significant for<br />

marketable and total tuber number. Marketable and total tuber numbers decreased markedly in<br />

the organic system over inorganic nutrition. Alike, tuber numbers, marketable and total tuber<br />

yield (t ha -1 ) varied significantly among various genotypes and due to different nutritional<br />

approaches. Interaction effect for both the factors was also significant. Two main challenges<br />

i.e. disease and nutrient management have been identified in organic potato production (Finckh<br />

et al., 2006). Among all the screened clones and varieties, advanced hybrid MS/15-1001<br />

attained the highest mean marketable productivity (22.0) remaining comparable to hybrid<br />

HT/12-751 (19.2), MS/16-1156 (19.1) and CP4409 (18.0). Total tuber yield also followed a<br />

similar trend. Tuber dry matter content (%) was acceptable for the best-performing clones and<br />

was above 18%. Lombardo et al. (2012) also worked on similar lines and could identify two<br />

clones comparable to popular variety in Italy in terms <strong>of</strong> their higher total yield and nutritional<br />

value (total protein and vitamin C content) under organic cultivation system. Green manure at<br />

higher rates (400 and 200 Kg/ha) increased the accumulation <strong>of</strong> dry matter in potato above<br />

ground parts and tubers as observed by Mohamed et al. (2017). As compared to inorganic<br />

nutrition, better tuber dry matter content was observed in organic nutrition with better taste and<br />

flavour.<br />

Tuber yield (t/ha)<br />

30<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

0<br />

MS/15-1001<br />

HT/12-751<br />

CP 4409<br />

MS/16-1156<br />

MS/14-505<br />

MSP/17-07<br />

K. Lima<br />

MS/15-1422<br />

MCIP/17-89<br />

HT/MK-21<br />

MS/11-664<br />

MS/15-758<br />

K. Mohan<br />

K. Sangam<br />

HT/12-830<br />

MS/9-723<br />

K. FryOm<br />

MS/13-391<br />

MCIP/16-209<br />

K.Ganga<br />

MS/14-243<br />

MS/14-1381<br />

MCIP/9-11<br />

K. Chipsona-4<br />

K. Chipsona-3<br />

K. Lalit<br />

MS/9-2196<br />

K. Lauvkar<br />

MSP/16-300<br />

K Chipsona-1<br />

K. Thar-2<br />

MCIP/11-185<br />

MS/8-1148<br />

MS/13-527<br />

HT/MK-8<br />

K. Chandramukhi<br />

MP/12-105<br />

MSP/16-307<br />

MS/16-1157<br />

K. Neelkanth<br />

MS/15-1505<br />

ATL<br />

K. Karan<br />

K. Kiran<br />

Lady Rosetta<br />

MSH/14-7<br />

MS/16-375<br />

MSP/16-216<br />

MSP/15-60<br />

K. Pukhraj<br />

Marketable Non-marketable Dry matter (%)<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

0<br />

Tuber dry matter content(%)<br />

Yield performance <strong>of</strong> advanced clones and varieties during 2019-21 (Pooled means)<br />

Conclusion<br />

Screening and evaluation <strong>of</strong> potential advanced clones having wide base <strong>of</strong> parental lines can<br />

help in attaining sustainable potato yields in organic nutrition as some <strong>of</strong> the advanced hybrids<br />

like MS/15-1001, HT/12-751, CP4409 and MS/16-1156 have shown their yield and qualitative<br />

367 | Page Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

potential in comparison to popular new varieties like Kufri Lima, Kufri Lohit, Kufri Sangam,<br />

Kufri FryOm and Kufri Ganga.<br />

References<br />

Anonymous. 2022. Department <strong>of</strong> agriculture and farmers welfare. (https/ agricoop.nic.in/ en/<br />

statistics/ horticulture- crops- 2019- 20- second- advance- estimates, 10 November 2022).<br />

Mohamed E.M., Watthier M., Zanuncio J.C. and Santos R.H. 2017. Dry matter accumulation<br />

and potato productivity with green manure. Idesia, 35(1): 79-86.<br />

Lombardo S., Monaco A.L., Pandino G., Parisi B. and Mauromicale G. 2012. The phenology,<br />

yield and tuber composition <strong>of</strong> ‘early’ crop potatoes: A comparison between organic and<br />

conventional cultivation systems. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems, 28(1): 50-<br />

58.<br />

Finckh M.R., Schulte-Geldermann E. and Bruns C. 2006 Challenges to organic potato farming:<br />

Disease and nutrient management. Potato Research, 49: 27- 42.<br />

IRRI. 1999. IRRISTAT for windows version 4.0., Biometrics unit, IRRI, Los Banos,<br />

Philippines.<br />

T3-15P-1208<br />

Assessment <strong>of</strong> Performance <strong>of</strong> Drought Tolerant Rice Variety in Koshi region<br />

P.K. Chaudhary, M.K. Ray and M. Kumar<br />

Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Supaul, Krishi Vigyan Kendra Kishanganj, BAU Sabour.<br />

Rice is one <strong>of</strong> the main crop <strong>of</strong> Bihar but its productivity is very poor. More than 60% rice area<br />

is concentrated in Bihar in low productivity zone and this zone contributes more than 50% <strong>of</strong><br />

rice production <strong>of</strong> the State. Area coverage under rice with high yielding varieties is about 65%<br />

and irrigation facility is available for about 40% rice area in the State. If the productivity <strong>of</strong><br />

low productivity zone is increased, the rice production can be increased considerably without<br />

increasing the area under rice. Inspite <strong>of</strong> the good soil condition and plenty <strong>of</strong> critical natural<br />

resource i.e water the overall rice productivity and overall system productivity <strong>of</strong> the district<br />

are low. The productivity <strong>of</strong> major crops in the district is less that the state and national average<br />

except maize. In case <strong>of</strong> rice the productivity is very less and it is about 50 to 60 percent <strong>of</strong><br />

state and national average. The low productivity <strong>of</strong> rice has been observed due to unavailability<br />

<strong>of</strong> suitable, stress tolerant rice variety as per the land topography and delayed transplanting.<br />

This study has been focused on the performance <strong>of</strong> drought tolerant short duration paddy<br />

variety Sahbhagi dhan demonstrated in different year.<br />

Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance<br />

368 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Methodology<br />

This study was carried out in adopted villages <strong>of</strong> Krishi Vigyan Kendra (KVK) Supaul under<br />

NICRA project during kharif season in different year. The demonstrations on stress tolerant<br />

paddy variety Sahbhagi dhan were conducted in three different adopted villages i.e.<br />

Sadanandpur, Bishanpur and Besa <strong>of</strong> Supaul district in Bihar over the period. The Supaul<br />

district is situated adjust to Koshi river and the river flows across the district. This particular<br />

variety was chosen for demonstration because <strong>of</strong> suitability <strong>of</strong> soil and climatic condition. The<br />

performance <strong>of</strong> Sahbhagi dhan were compared with local variety known as Butraj. All the<br />

participating farmers were trained on various aspects <strong>of</strong> rice production technologies and<br />

recommended agronomic practices. The soil <strong>of</strong> demonstration site was slightly acidic in nature<br />

(pH-5.5 to 6.5) with sandy loam in texture. The normal annual rainfall <strong>of</strong> the district was 1344<br />

mm and more than 85% <strong>of</strong> it was received during rainy season. In year 2018-19 two dry spell<br />

<strong>of</strong> one week in the month <strong>of</strong> June and one dry spell <strong>of</strong> one week in the month <strong>of</strong> July and<br />

August each were observed. Whereas in year 2019-20, June months was almost dry and one<br />

week dry spell in July month was also observed. It is clearly visible that the most <strong>of</strong> the<br />

precipitation has been occurred during the rainy season from June to September during south<br />

west monsoon.<br />

Results<br />

The demonstrated paddy variety Sahbhagi dhan has shown stress tolerance capacity up to 10-<br />

15 days which is more than the local variety Bhutraj. The maximum yield obtained <strong>of</strong> Shabhagi<br />

was 34.0 q/ha in transplanted field where as the local variety maximum yield was less as 27.0<br />

q/ha. It has been observed that there is an increase in yield <strong>of</strong> 25 to 30 % during the study<br />

period.<br />

Yield performance and percentage yield increase<br />

Crop Year Demo<br />

Variety<br />

Demo yield<br />

(Q/ha)<br />

Check<br />

Variety<br />

Check<br />

(Q/ha)<br />

% increase<br />

Paddy 2016 Sahbhagi 34 Bhutraj 27 25.93<br />

Paddy 2017 Sahbhagi 32 Bhutraj 26 23.08<br />

Paddy 2018 Sahbhagi 34 Bhutraj 26 30.77<br />

Due the drought resistance performance <strong>of</strong> Sahbhagi dhan, the farmers are assured about yield.<br />

During the Kharif season <strong>of</strong> year 2018 there was two dry spell <strong>of</strong> one week in the month <strong>of</strong><br />

June and one dry spell <strong>of</strong> one week in the month <strong>of</strong> July but Sahbhagi dhan performed well and<br />

maintained the yield. However, in year 2017 slightly less yield were observed because <strong>of</strong><br />

submergence and loss <strong>of</strong> crop due to high precipitation in the month <strong>of</strong> July and August. In<br />

above table the highest yield increase <strong>of</strong> 30 % observed in year 2018. Whereas minimum yield<br />

369 | Page Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

increase <strong>of</strong> about 23 % observed in year 2017. Also, in year 2016 a significant increase in yield<br />

<strong>of</strong> about 26 % over conventional variety were observed. The average yield increase <strong>of</strong> 26.92<br />

percent was observed over the period.<br />

Year<br />

Demo<br />

Gross<br />

Cost<br />

Economic parameters <strong>of</strong> demonstration<br />

Demo<br />

Gross<br />

Return<br />

Demo<br />

Net<br />

Return<br />

Demo<br />

BCR<br />

Local<br />

Gross<br />

Cost<br />

Local<br />

Gross<br />

Return<br />

Local<br />

Net<br />

Return<br />

Local<br />

BCR<br />

2016 28000 54400 26400 1.94 25500 43200 17700 1.69<br />

2017 27000 51200 24201 1.89 26500 41600 15100 1.56<br />

2018 27000 59500 32500 2.2 25000 45500 20500 1.82<br />

A significant increase in net return and benefit cost ratio were observed in comparison <strong>of</strong> local<br />

variety over the period. In year 2018 the highest net returns <strong>of</strong> Rs. 32500.00 per hectare under<br />

demonstration was observed and it was about 58 % higher than the return from local variety<br />

which was Rs. 20500.00 per hectare. The benefit cost ratio <strong>of</strong> demonstration was also<br />

significantly higher than the local variety.<br />

Conclusion<br />

The above results revealed that the performance <strong>of</strong> demonstrated drought tolerant rice variety<br />

Sahbhagi Dhan was superior over the local variety Bhutraj due to the highly drought tolerant<br />

capacity and short duration with more productivity. The demonstrated variety Sahbhagi dhan<br />

was superior on all the major parameters. In Koshi region, Shabhagi dhan has shown its<br />

potential to dominate and replace the local variety because <strong>of</strong> higher yield and enhanced net<br />

return per hectare.<br />

T3-16P-1414<br />

Drought Tolerant and High Yielding Groundnut Varieties for Rainfed<br />

Ecosystem in Perambalur District<br />

M. Punithavathi, V. E. Nethaji Mariappn, P.Dominic Manoj and V. Sangeetha<br />

ICAR – Krishi Vigyan Kendra<br />

Hans Roever Campus, Valikandapuram, Perambalur District, Tamil Nadu - 621115<br />

kvk.perambalur@icar.gov.in; kvkroever@gmail.com<br />

Groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) is an important Oilseed crop mainly cultivated under rainfed<br />

condition in Perambalur district <strong>of</strong> Tamil Nadu. In present investigation, three Groundnut<br />

varieties namely Dharani, Co7 and TMV 7 were used to assess the drought tolerance and<br />

yielding potential. Erratic rainfall and frequent drought during the crop growth period,<br />

Groundnut yield are generally low under rainfed condition. Drought during the critical crop<br />

Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance<br />

370 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

growth stages are crucial for loss in yield <strong>of</strong> Groundnut varieties, but tolerant genotypes may<br />

give significant yield due to maintenance <strong>of</strong> physiological responses that were triggered during<br />

drought. In Perambalur district, On Farm Testing (OFT) was conducted by ICAR-Krishi<br />

Vigyan Kendra, Perambalur, Tamil Nadu, to assess suitable drought tolerant and high yielding<br />

Groundnut variety in terms <strong>of</strong> yield, acceptability and adoption potential during rabi 2020-21.<br />

The study revealed that Dharani recorded higher pod yield (2402 kg ha -1 ), high number <strong>of</strong> pods<br />

plant -1 (26) and optimum Plant population (26.3 plants m -2 ) as compared to farmers practice.<br />

The groundnut variety Dharani resulted in the highest shelling percentage (75%), while the<br />

lowest was registered with TMV 7 (71%). The Gross and Net returns were Rs. 1, 15,324 and<br />

Rs. 66,593 ha-1 respectively by cultivating Dharani as against Rs. 87, 523 and 41, 550 ha -1 in<br />

the check variety. Groundnut variety Dharani would be a better option for rainfed cultivation<br />

in Perambalur district <strong>of</strong> Tamil Nadu.<br />

T3-17P-1425<br />

Eco-Friendly Management <strong>of</strong> White Grub a Devastating Insect Pest <strong>of</strong><br />

Rainfed Agro- Ecosystem in Uttarakhand Hills<br />

Kamal K. Pande, Harish Chandra Joshi, Nawal Kishor Singh and Himanshu Bhatt<br />

Krishi Vigyan Kendra (ICAR-VPKAS), Kafligair- 263628, Bageshwar, Uttarakhand<br />

The Agriculture in the north western Indian Himalayan Hilly region is being practiced mostly<br />

by the marginal and resource poor farmers and they face several biotic and abiotic stresses due<br />

to the fragile ecosystem and harsh climatic conditions. In north western Himalaya majority <strong>of</strong><br />

areas comes under rainfed condition and cropped areas is under well drained sandy soil along<br />

hill slopes which is favourable for growth and development <strong>of</strong> white grubs so the white grub is<br />

a major challenge in rainfed agriculture. White grubs are polyphagous insect with cosmopolitan<br />

nature. A grub is the larval stage <strong>of</strong> scarab beetle. More than 75 species <strong>of</strong> white grub have<br />

been recorded in Uttarakhand but Anomala dimidiata, Holotrichia longipennis and Holotrichia<br />

seticollis have been reported as the dominant white grub species in this state. The grub damages<br />

the root <strong>of</strong> many cultivated field and vegetable crops, whereas their adult beetles cause severe<br />

defoliation <strong>of</strong> many fruit and forest trees. The damage caused by the grub under rainfed<br />

conditions may vary on an average 10-30 % to sometime complete crop failure. Several<br />

insecticides are recommended for the control <strong>of</strong> white grub, but in fact the insecticide does not<br />

satisfactory control unless used in very high doses, which in turn become hazardous and<br />

uneconomical besides being unsustainable. The adult beetles are attracted towards light, hence<br />

light traps were found to be effective tool for trapping <strong>of</strong> adult <strong>of</strong> white grub so ICAR-<br />

Vivekanand Patvatiya Krishi Anusandhan Sansthan, Almora designed and developed VL<br />

White Grub Beetle Trap -1. This technology is low cost, ec<strong>of</strong>riendly and provides long term<br />

integrated insect pest management. Therefore, this ec<strong>of</strong>riendly novel technology was<br />

371 | Page Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

demonstrated for the management <strong>of</strong> white grub beetle by installing VL White Grub Beetle<br />

Trap -1 at NICRA adopted village Karalapalari <strong>of</strong> KVK Bageshwar under TDC-National<br />

Innovations <strong>of</strong> Climate Resilient Agriculture (TDC- NICRA) project. Karalapalari is located<br />

in Kafligair Tehsil, 35 km away from district head quarter Bageshwar, Uttarakhand. In this<br />

village 64 households are present and the village is having 45.61 ha total geographical area and<br />

20.05 ha rainfed cultivated area.<br />

Methodology<br />

Before NICRA project intervention the farmers <strong>of</strong> this village were mostly unaware about the<br />

life cycle and management <strong>of</strong> the white grub. Therefore, awareness programme for the farmers<br />

were conducted to adopt VL White Grub Beetle Trap -1. The light traps were installed at<br />

strategic locations for the management <strong>of</strong> white grub beetles in village Karalapaladi. Data<br />

collection for the trapped white grub beetles was done at weekly interval for five months<br />

starting from June 2022 till October 2022 with the participation <strong>of</strong> farmers.<br />

Results<br />

Very encouraging results were found and 1.32 lakh beetle were trapped between June to Oct<br />

2022 in the first year <strong>of</strong> installation <strong>of</strong> VL White Grub Beetle Trap -1. The data also showed<br />

that maximum trapping <strong>of</strong> white grub beetles was concentrated from second week <strong>of</strong> July to<br />

third week <strong>of</strong> August. While in first week <strong>of</strong> June and last week <strong>of</strong> October, it was the<br />

minimum. It is projected that this trapping <strong>of</strong> beetles will consequently result in 80-90%<br />

reduction in grub population. This huge reduction in beetle and grub population will ultimately<br />

improve the rainfed agro- ecosystem in a sustainable manner.<br />

T3-18P-1285<br />

Effect <strong>of</strong> Crop Geometry on Growth and Yield under Direct Seeded Hybrid<br />

Rice (Oryza sativa l.) Cultivars<br />

Ajoy Das*, Sujan Biswas and Uday Narayan Das<br />

Dhaanyaganga Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Murshidabad, West Bengal<br />

* ajoydasblp92@gmail.com<br />

Rice (Oryza sativa L.) is one <strong>of</strong> the major staple food grains for more than 50% <strong>of</strong> the world’s<br />

population. The option <strong>of</strong> intensifying the area under rice in the near future is limited. The<br />

major challenge is to achieve this gain with less water, labor, and chemicals, thereby ensuring<br />

long-term sustainability. Depending on water and labor paucity, farmers are altering either their<br />

rice establishment methods from transplanting to direct seeding in unpuddled soil with<br />

adopting DSR, it is possible to save water. Among the cultural technologies, planting density<br />

is one <strong>of</strong> the important components, the manipulation <strong>of</strong> which is an essence for optimizing<br />

Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance<br />

372 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

yield. Improper spacing reduced yield up to 20-30% (IRRI, 1997). The optimum spacing<br />

ensures the plant to grow in both aerial and underground parts through efficient utilization <strong>of</strong><br />

solar radiation and nutrients (Khan et al., 2005). Therefore, an attempt was made to test the<br />

yield potential <strong>of</strong> five rice cultivars under direct-seeded conditions with narrow and wider<br />

spacing.<br />

Methodology<br />

The experiment was conducted during the Kharif season <strong>of</strong> 2021 at the experimental farm <strong>of</strong><br />

Dhaanyaganga Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Ramakrishna Mission Ashrama, Sargachi. The<br />

investigation was laid out in a split-plot design replicated thrice. The treatments comprised five<br />

cultivars (Arize 6444, PHB 71, PRH 10, MTU 7029 and HUR 105) assigned to main plots.<br />

Each main plot was further divided into two sub-plots to accommodate two crop geometry<br />

treatments i.e. 20 × 10 and 25 × 25 cm 2 . A herbicide mixture <strong>of</strong> bispyribac sodium @ 25g ha -1<br />

and Azimsulphuron @30 g ha -1 was also applied at 18 DAS to control weed flora. Plant height,<br />

number <strong>of</strong> tillers m -2 and dry matter accumulation m -1 running row, leaf area index among crop<br />

growth characters, yield attributing characters like panicle length, panicle weight, number <strong>of</strong><br />

effective tillers m -2 , number <strong>of</strong> grains panicle -1 and test weight. All the data obtained from the<br />

experiment were statistically analyzed using the F-test (Gomez and Gomez, 1984).<br />

Results<br />

Cultivars<br />

The maximum plant height and number <strong>of</strong> tillers m -2 were recorded in Arize 6444. It also had<br />

significantly higher dry matter accumulation m -1 running row and leaf area index than PHB 71,<br />

PRH 10, MTU 7029, and HUR 105. At 90 DAS, the plant height <strong>of</strong> PRH 10 was statistically<br />

at par with Arize 6444 and in the case <strong>of</strong> a number <strong>of</strong> tillers, m -2 Arize 6444 became statistically<br />

similar with PRH 10 and MTU 7029. In contrast, HUR 105 recorded lesser growth attributing<br />

characters. Yield attributing characters like panicle weight, number <strong>of</strong> effective tillers m -2 ,<br />

number <strong>of</strong> grains panicle -1 and test weight <strong>of</strong> Arize 6444 was significantly higher than other<br />

cultivars. Yield attributes in HUR 105 were lesser in most <strong>of</strong> the characters like panicle length,<br />

panicle weight, number <strong>of</strong> effective tillers m -2, and number <strong>of</strong> grains panicle -1 than the rest <strong>of</strong><br />

the cultivars. The minimum test weight was recorded in MTU 7029. Consequently, Arize 6444<br />

recorded the highest grain yield. The higher values <strong>of</strong> yield attributes recorded in Arize 6444<br />

than other cultivars were due to higher growth attributes and hybrid vigor.<br />

Spacing<br />

Square spacing (25 × 25 cm 2 ) recorded more plant height, dry matter accumulation, number <strong>of</strong><br />

tillers m -2 , and leaf area index in comparison to 20 × 10 cm 2 . Differences in plant height at both<br />

spacings were statistically at par. However, significantly higher dry matter accumulation m -1<br />

373 | Page Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

running row, the number <strong>of</strong> tillers m -2 , and leaf area index were recorded in square spacing (25<br />

× 25 cm 2 ) as compared to plant spacing (20 × 10 cm 2 ). In the case <strong>of</strong> yield attributing characters<br />

like panicle length, effective tillers m -2 , number <strong>of</strong> grains panicle -1 , and test weight were<br />

significantly higher at wider plant spacing (25 × 25 cm 2 ) as compared to narrow spacing (20 ×<br />

10 cm 2 ). As a result, grain yield was significantly higher in wider plant spacing (25 × 25 cm 2 )<br />

as compared to narrow spacing (20 × 10 cm 2 ). The improvement in the yield attributing<br />

characters and yield <strong>of</strong> Arize 6444 might be the result <strong>of</strong> better utilization <strong>of</strong> space, light, and<br />

other inputs mainly due to the reduced inter- and intra-plant competition which ultimately<br />

favored bolder grains at wider spacing transforming into grain yield.<br />

Conclusion<br />

Grain yield in cultivar Arize 6444 at 25 × 25 cm 2 and PHB 71 at 25 × 25 cm 2 was found superior<br />

to the rest <strong>of</strong> the cultivars. Rice hybrid Arize 6444 recorded significantly higher grain yield<br />

(56.14 q ha -1 ) compared to cultivar PHB 71 (53.16 q ha -1 ), MTU 7029 (51.23 q ha -1 ), PRH 10<br />

(51.02 q ha -1 ) and HUR 105 (42.67 q ha -1 ).<br />

Effect <strong>of</strong> cultivars and spacing on growth, yield attributing characters and yield in directseeded<br />

rice at 90 DAS<br />

Treatment<br />

Cultivar<br />

Plant<br />

height<br />

(cm)<br />

Dry<br />

matter<br />

m -1<br />

running<br />

row<br />

Number<br />

<strong>of</strong> tillers<br />

m -2<br />

Leaf<br />

area<br />

index<br />

(LAI)<br />

Panicle<br />

length<br />

(cm)<br />

Panicle<br />

weight<br />

(g)<br />

Effective<br />

tillers<br />

m -2<br />

No <strong>of</strong><br />

grains<br />

panicle -1<br />

Test<br />

weight<br />

(g)<br />

Yield<br />

(Kg ha -1 )<br />

Arize 6444 106.98 85.20 492.16 4.07 25.66 7.34 337.98 189.33 25.21 5614.90<br />

PHB 71 104.26 71.61 477.33 3.69 27.66 6.18 280.27 176.5 23.6 5361.30<br />

PRH 10 86.98 78.96 461.50 3.38 30 6.28 260.14 181.83 24.57 5102.50<br />

MTU 7029 64.65 73.49 486.83 3.75 22.16 6.03 288.13 154.17 18.38 5123.40<br />

HUR 105 83.61 64.02 456.16 3.40 20.83 5.61 238.24 145.83 20.96 4267.90<br />

SEm± 0.89 1.93 5.90 0.07 0.47 0.25 2.96 2.96 0.21 77.19<br />

CD 2.93 6.30 19.25 0.22 1.55 0.82 9.67 9.68 0.7 251.72<br />

Spacing (cm 2 )<br />

20 × 10 89.40 79.27 465.46 3.92 24.8 6.54 275.99 156.86 22.08 4978.69<br />

25 × 25 89.20 70.04 484.13 3.39 25.73 6.00 285.91 173.20 23 5209.29<br />

SEm± 0.37 0.60 19.25 0.04 0.11 0.16 2.65 1.66 0.18 43.21<br />

CD NS 1.91 18.33 0.14 0.36 0.53 8.37 5.24 0.57 133.00<br />

References<br />

Gomez, K. A., and Gomaz, A. A. 1984. Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research. J.<br />

Wiley and Sons, Singapore.<br />

Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance<br />

374 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

IRRI (International Rice Research Institute), 1997. Rice Production Manual, p: 95. UPLB, Los<br />

Banos, The Philippines.<br />

Khan, M.B., Yasir, T.A. and Aman, M. 2005. Growth and yield comparison <strong>of</strong> different linseed<br />

genotypes planted at different row spacing. Int. J. Agric. Biol., 7: 515–517.<br />

T3-19P-1045<br />

Evaluation <strong>of</strong> Bamboo Species Suitable for Southern Telangana Region<br />

G. Venkatesh, K. Sammi Reddy, K.A. Gopinath, V.K. Singh and R. Rejani<br />

ICAR-Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, Hyderabad- 500059<br />

Bamboos in India, is an exceptionally diverse plant group consisting <strong>of</strong> nearly 76 genera and<br />

136 species. It encompasses about 8.96 million hectares <strong>of</strong> forest area, which is equivalent to<br />

12.8 per cent <strong>of</strong> the total forest cover <strong>of</strong> the country. Bamboo is the fastest growing,<br />

multipurpose plant and has several advantages over tree species in-terms <strong>of</strong> sustainability;<br />

increase in green cover; provides various ecosystem services viz., carbon sequestration,<br />

preventing soil erosion and cultural rituals in rural areas (Kaushik et al. 2015; Tewari et al.<br />

2016). Bamboos have the potential to be incorporated into agr<strong>of</strong>orestry systems in the semiarid<br />

tropics in place <strong>of</strong> conventional tree species. The major user <strong>of</strong> bamboo in India is the<br />

paper industry. In addition, bamboo supports a number <strong>of</strong> traditional cottage industries,<br />

including production <strong>of</strong> handicrafts, incense sticks, and related articles. So far systematic<br />

research on bamboo has been carried out in high rainfall/irrigated areas. Very limited work on<br />

bamboo has been done in dryland/rainfed areas for evaluating the performance <strong>of</strong> bamboo<br />

species. For extending bamboo cultivation, species suitability need to be tested and evaluated<br />

for dryland areas <strong>of</strong> Southern Telangana for large scale promotion and adoption. The aim <strong>of</strong><br />

this study was to evaluate the growth performance <strong>of</strong> three bamboo species under rainfed<br />

Alfisols <strong>of</strong> Southern Telangana conditions.<br />

Methodology<br />

A field experiment was initiated at Hayatnagar Research Farm during 2021 with three bamboo<br />

species (germplasm resources <strong>of</strong> TFRI, Jabalpur) viz., Bambusa balcooa, Bambusa tulda and<br />

Bambusa nutans under rainfed Alfisol. The experiment was set up in randomized block design<br />

with four replications. For each species, 12 clumps (3 x 4; rows x clumps) per replication was<br />

established at 8 x 8 m spacing. Recommended dose <strong>of</strong> fertilizer (RDF) was applied as<br />

recommended by National bamboo Mission to the planted bamboo species. Bamboo species<br />

were planted during August, 2021.<br />

375 | Page Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Results<br />

Initial observations on culm height, collar diameter and number culms per species were<br />

recorded after planting. The survival <strong>of</strong> bamboo species was 100% at the end <strong>of</strong> one year.<br />

Performance <strong>of</strong> three bamboo species were observed for culm height, 5 th internode diameter<br />

and total no <strong>of</strong> culms. Among the three species, Bambusa nutans (99.21 cm) recorded higher<br />

average culm height followed by Bambusa balcooa (70.9 cm) and Bambusa tulda (61.4 cm);<br />

whereas Bambusa balcooa (0.80 cm) recorded higher average collar diameter (0.80 cm) and<br />

total no <strong>of</strong> culms (82) followed by Bambusa nutans (0.59 cm and 68, respectively) and<br />

Bambusa tulda (0.52 cm and 52, respectively) at end <strong>of</strong> 06 months after planting.<br />

Conclusion<br />

Preliminary results indicated that, all three bamboo species performed well under rainfed<br />

conditions.<br />

References<br />

Kaushik, S., Singh, Y.P., Kumar, D., Thapliyal, M and Barthwal, S. 2015. Bamboos in India,<br />

ENVIS Centre on Forestry, National Forest Library and Information Centre. Forest<br />

Research Institute, Dehradun, 326 pp.<br />

Tewari, R.K., Ram, A., Dev, I., Sridhar, K.B and Singh, R. 2016. Farmers’ friendly technique<br />

for multiplication <strong>of</strong> bamboo (Bambusa vulgaris). Current Science 111(5): 886–889.<br />

T3-20P-1218<br />

Evaluation <strong>of</strong> Different Herbicides in kharif Sweet Corn (Zea mays<br />

saccharata. L)<br />

S.B. Tambare, G.D. Gadade, S.U. Pawar and B.V. Asewar<br />

Vasantrao Naik Marathwada Krishi Vidyapeeth, Parbhani – 431402, Maharashtra.<br />

Sweet corn an excellent source <strong>of</strong> sugars, dietary fiber, vitamin-C, beta-carotene, niacin,<br />

calcium and potassium faces the problem <strong>of</strong> season-long weed competition which ultimately<br />

reflects into considerable yield loss. Weeds not only compete for light, water, nutrient and<br />

carbon dioxide but interfere with harvesting and increase the cost involved in crop production.<br />

Thus weeds in sweet corn reduce the green cob yield upto 56%. Weed management is a difficult<br />

task for kharif sweet corn due to slushy or hard field conditions that emerges as a result <strong>of</strong><br />

aberrations <strong>of</strong> monsoon and scarcity <strong>of</strong> labour. Under such circumstances chemical weed<br />

management is more feasible, less laborious, cost effective and economical in sweet corn.<br />

Studies reported that herbicides controlled 65-90% <strong>of</strong> weed flora and gave 100-150% more<br />

maize yield than weedy check (Nadeem et al. 2006). Taking into consideration the above facts,<br />

Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance<br />

376 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

the present investigation was undertaken with the objectives to study the effect <strong>of</strong> different preemergence<br />

and post-emergence herbicides on growth and yield <strong>of</strong> kharif sweet corn, weed<br />

control efficacy <strong>of</strong> different herbicides in kharif sweet corn and to work out the economics <strong>of</strong><br />

different treatments.<br />

Methodology<br />

The field experiment was conducted at research farm <strong>of</strong> AICRP on Irrigation Water<br />

Management, Vasantrao Naik Marathwada Krishi Vidyapeeth, Parbhani (MS) during kharif<br />

2021. The field experiment was laid out in randomized block design with eight treatments and<br />

replicated thrice. Treatment consisted <strong>of</strong> five different molecules <strong>of</strong> post emergence herbicides<br />

and for comparison one treatment each <strong>of</strong> pre-emergence herbicide, weedy check (unweeded<br />

control) and weed free treatment (2 Hand weeding). Seeds <strong>of</strong> sweet corn (Var. Sugar-75) were<br />

dibbled at the spacing <strong>of</strong> 60cm x 20cm on 29 June 2021. The recommended dose <strong>of</strong> NPK<br />

(150:75:75 NPK kg ha -1 ) and plant protection schedule was followed.<br />

Results<br />

The data furnished in Table revealed that green cob yield, GMR and NMR <strong>of</strong> sweet corn was<br />

significantly influenced by different weed management treatments. Weed free treatment (T 7)<br />

recorded significantly higher green cob yield and GMR <strong>of</strong> sweet corn, however it was<br />

comparable with application <strong>of</strong> PoE Mesotrione 2.27% w/w + Atrazine 22.7% w/w SC @ 875g<br />

a.i.ha -1 at 20-25 DAS (T 6), PE Atrazine @ 1 kg a.i. ha -1 + one hand weeding at 20 DAS (T 1)<br />

and PoE Tembotrione 34.4% SC 120g a.i.ha -1 at 20-25 DAS(T4). These findings are parallel<br />

with the earlier findings reported by Chhokar et al. (2019) wherein mesotrione and atrazine<br />

combination has synergistic effect, which ultimately helped in managing diverse weed flora in<br />

maize and enhancing its productivity. Due to cost effective weed management higher NMR<br />

was obtained in herbicidal treatments. Application <strong>of</strong> PoE Mesotrione 2.27% w/w + Atrazine<br />

22.7% w/w SC @ 875 g a.i.ha -1 at 20-25 DAS (T6) recorded significantly higher NMR and<br />

was at par with PE Atrazine @ 1 kg a.i. ha -1 + one hand weeding at 20 DAS (T 1), PoE<br />

Tembotrione 34.4% SC 120g a.i.ha -1 at 20-25 DAS (T4) and weed free treatment (T7). Similar<br />

trend was observed in respect <strong>of</strong> B:C ratio.<br />

Mean green cob yield, GMR and NMR <strong>of</strong> sweet corn as influenced by different weed<br />

management treatments<br />

Treatments<br />

T 1 : PE Atrazine @ 1 kg a.i. ha -1 + one hand<br />

weeding at 20 DAS<br />

Green cob<br />

yield (q ha -1 )<br />

GMR<br />

(Rs. ha -1 )<br />

NMR<br />

(Rs. ha -1 )<br />

B:C<br />

Ratio<br />

162.62 167417 109834 2.89<br />

377 | Page Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

T 2: PoE Topramezone @ 33.6 g a.i.ha -1 at 20-25<br />

DAS .<br />

141.11 146152 90036 2.60<br />

T 3: PoE 2,4-D @1.0 kg a.i. ha -1 at 20-25 DAS 133.96 141053 89895 2.76<br />

T 4: PoE Tembotrione 34.4% SC 120g a.i.ha -1 at 20-<br />

25 DAS<br />

T 5: PoE Halosulfuron methyl @ 67.5g a.i.ha -1 at<br />

20-25 DAS<br />

T 6: PoE Mesotrione 2.27% w/w + Atrazine 22.7%<br />

w/w SC @ 875g a.i.ha -1 at 20-25 DAS<br />

157.62 163151 108192 2.97<br />

129.89 137848 81216 2.43<br />

165.09 169217 113934 3.06<br />

T 7: Weed free ( 2 Hand weeding) 167.98 171864 109382 2.75<br />

T 8: Weedy check (Unweeded control) 74.75 85448 35965 1.73<br />

SE + 6.06 6664 5722 _<br />

C.D. (5%) 18.30 20121 17277 _<br />

General mean 141.63 147769 92307 2.65<br />

Conclusion<br />

Based on the present findings, it can be concluded that application <strong>of</strong> PoE herbicide Mesotrione<br />

2.27% w/w + Atrazine 22.7% w/w SC @ 875 g a.i.ha -1 at 20-25 DAS or PE Atrazine @ 1 kg<br />

a.i. ha -1 + one hand weeding at 20 DAS or PoE Tembotrione 34.4% SC 120g a.i.ha -1 at 20-25<br />

DAS was found pr<strong>of</strong>itable, cost effective and one <strong>of</strong> the good alternative options for hand<br />

weeding.<br />

References<br />

Chhokar, R.S., Sharma, R.K., Gill, S.C and Singh, R.K. 2019. Mesotrione and atrazine<br />

combination to control diverse weed flora in maize. Indian Journal <strong>of</strong> Weed Science.<br />

51(2): 145-150<br />

Nadeem, M.A., Tufail, M.S and Tahir, M. 2006. Effect <strong>of</strong> different herbicides on growth and<br />

yield <strong>of</strong> spring maize (Zea mays L.). In: International Symposium on Sustainable<br />

crop improvement and integrated management, Faisalabad. Proceedings. Faisalabad:<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Agriculture, 2006.<br />

Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance<br />

378 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

T3-21P-1420<br />

Evaluation <strong>of</strong> F3:4 Population for Seedling Stage Salinity Tolerance in Rice<br />

(Oryza sativa L.)<br />

M. Vani Praveena, P. Venkata Ramana Rao, B. Jyothi, Ch. Sreenivas and D. Ramesh<br />

Agricultural college, Bapatla, ANGRAU<br />

RARS, Maruteru-534122, ANGRAU<br />

ICAR-Indian Institute <strong>of</strong> Rice Research (ICAR-IIRR), Rajendranagar, Hyderbad-500030<br />

Rice (Oryza sativa L.) is most widely consumed cereal crop with its demand expected to<br />

increase by 38% within 30 years (Ali et al. 2013). With increasing world population, there is a<br />

necessity to increase overall grain production by 1.5% every year, requiring a 35% increase in<br />

production by 2030 and greater than 70% by 2050. Hence, improving rice productivity is<br />

critical to maintain economic growth, food security and sustainable production. However, the<br />

increasing trend in rice production is severely hampered by various abiotic stresses arising due<br />

to climate change and environmental variabilities. In crop plants drought, salinity and<br />

alkalinity, nutrient toxicity or deficiency, flooding and poor drainage, high or low soil pH, high<br />

and low temperatures and heavy metals are some <strong>of</strong> the important abiotic stresses arising due<br />

to environmental factors which are complex thus limiting the crop production globally. Among<br />

these, drought and salinity have high impact on rice productivity, salinity being second<br />

important abiotic stress in rice after drought. In India about 6.73 million hectares <strong>of</strong> land is saltaffected,<br />

<strong>of</strong> which 3.77 and 2.96 million hectares are sodic and saline soils respectively. Rice<br />

is most sensitive to soil salinity at both vegetative and reproductive stages. At the seedling<br />

stage, salinity causes poor rice crop establishment, shorter roots/shoots, and smaller leaves<br />

leading to early plant mortality. Therefore, understanding seedling stage salinity tolerance is<br />

very important for early plant establishment under saline stress which could help the plant to<br />

achieve good vegetative growth later. So, the objective <strong>of</strong> the present investigation is to<br />

evaluate F3:4 population for seedling stage salinity tolerance and to identify the tolerant lines.<br />

Methodology<br />

A total <strong>of</strong> 205 F 3:4 population with two parents i.e., MTU 1061 (salt tolerant) and MTU 1121<br />

(salt susceptible) were screened for salinity tolerance at seedling stage in greenhouse following<br />

the standard protocol <strong>of</strong> IRRI with some modifications (Gregorio et al., 1997). The screening<br />

experiment was conducted in a complete randomized design with 2 replications. Two pregerminated<br />

seeds <strong>of</strong> 205 F3:4 lines with parents (MTU 1061 and MTU 1121) and checks (MTU<br />

1010 and FL 478) were placed on the styr<strong>of</strong>oam seedling float. A total 24 styr<strong>of</strong>oam sheets<br />

were used for screening all the 204 F3:4 lines. The seedling floats were placed inside the<br />

greenhouse. Initially, the seedlings were grown in normal water for two days, followed by<br />

nutrient solution for following two days in Yoshida medium (Yoshida et al., 1976). When the<br />

379 | Page Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

seedlings were at two leaf stage, they were subjected to initial salinity stress <strong>of</strong> EC=6 dSm -1 by<br />

adding NaCl to nutrient solution and the pH was adjusted to 5.0. After eight days <strong>of</strong> initial<br />

salinization, the EC was increased to 12 dSm -1 . Initial scoring <strong>of</strong> the selected individual plants<br />

was recorded at 10 days after initial salinization as per SES <strong>of</strong> IRRI (1997). The description <strong>of</strong><br />

the standard evaluation score <strong>of</strong> 1 - 9 was presented in Table. The final score was recorded at<br />

16 days after initial salinization.<br />

Standard evaluation score (SES) <strong>of</strong> visual salt injury at seedling stage<br />

Score Observation Tolerance<br />

1 Normal growth, no leaf symptoms Highly tolerant<br />

3 Nearly normal growth, but leaf tips or few leaves whitish and rolled Tolerant<br />

5 Growth severely retarded, most leaves rolled; only a few are<br />

elongating<br />

Moderately Tolerant<br />

7 Complete cessation <strong>of</strong> growth; most leaves dry; some plants drying Susceptible<br />

9 Almost all plants dead or dying Highly susceptible<br />

Results<br />

F3:4 families were categorized according to standard evaluation scores recorded and presented in<br />

the Table 1 and Figure. In the present study, 204 F3:4 individuals derived from the cross between<br />

salt tolerant parent MTU1061 and salt susceptible parent MTU1121 were screened for salt<br />

tolerance at seedling stage following hydroponics system at two stress levels (EC=6 dS/m and<br />

EC=12 dS/m). Out <strong>of</strong> 204 genotypes screened for salt tolerance twelve genotypes showed tolerant<br />

reaction with SES <strong>of</strong> 3, forty-seven genotypes showed moderately tolerant reaction with a score <strong>of</strong><br />

5 and twenty-four genotypes showed highly susceptible reaction with a score <strong>of</strong> 9. More than<br />

hundred genotypes manifested susceptible reaction with salt evaluation score <strong>of</strong> 7. Salt tolerance is<br />

governed by multiple factors, tolerant reaction <strong>of</strong> the genotypes in this study might be attributed by<br />

mechanisms like tissue tolerance, ion exclusion, compartmentalization, activity <strong>of</strong> different growth<br />

regulators, transcriptional factors and several stress combating pathways (Krishnamurthy et al.,<br />

2020).<br />

Reaction <strong>of</strong> F 3:4 families against seedling stage salinity<br />

Score Count Salt tolerance<br />

3 12 Tolerant<br />

5 47 Moderately tolerant<br />

7 121 Moderately susceptible<br />

9 24 Highly susceptible<br />

Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance<br />

380 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

150<br />

Count<br />

100<br />

50<br />

0<br />

3 5<br />

Score<br />

7 9<br />

Graphical distribution <strong>of</strong> genotypes falling under different salt tolerance levels<br />

References<br />

Ali, S., Gautam, R.K., Mahajan, R., Krishnamurthy, S.L., Sharma, S.K., Singh, R.K. and<br />

Ismail, A.M., 2013. Stress indices and selectable traits in SALTOL QTL introgressed rice<br />

genotypes for reproductive stage tolerance to sodicity and salinity stresses. Field Crops<br />

Res., 154: 65-73.<br />

Gregoria, G.B., Senadhira, D. and Mendoza, R.D., 1997. Screening rice for salinity<br />

tolerance (No. 2169-2019-1605).<br />

Krishnamurthy, S.L., Pundir, P., Warraich, A.S., Rathor, S., Lokeshkumar, B.M., Singh, N.K.<br />

and Sharma, P.C., 2020. Introgressed saltol QTL lines improves the salinity tolerance in<br />

rice at seedling stage. Front. Plant Sci, 11: 833.<br />

Yoshida, S., Forno, D.A., Cock, J.K. and Gomez, K.A., 1976. Routine procedure for growing<br />

rice plants in culture solution. In: Laboratory manual for physiological studies <strong>of</strong> rice. 3rd<br />

edn. The International Rice Research Institute, Los Banos, Laguna, Philippines, pp 61–65.<br />

T3-22P-1543<br />

Evaluation <strong>of</strong> Newer Insecticides Against Safflower Aphid, Uroleucon<br />

Compositae (Theobald)<br />

S.M. Gangurde, P.S. Neharkar, S.D. Bantewad and P.R. Zanwar<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Agricultural Entomology, Vasantrao Naik Marathwada Krishi Vidyapeeth,<br />

Parbhani-431 402 (M.S.) -India<br />

Safflower, Carthamus tinctorius Linn. is the most important oilseed crop growing in the rabi<br />

season. The safflower crop is damaged by as high as 79 insect pests. The safflower aphid<br />

(Uroleucon Compositae Theobald) is the regular and most destructive pest in India. Therefore,<br />

it is the most important pest <strong>of</strong> safflower. Safflower aphids can be controlled by different<br />

insecticides recommended by many workers. Thiamethoxam 25 WG @ 50, 70, and 100<br />

381 | Page Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

g.a.i./ha were found most effective than imidacloprid 17.8 SL and dimethoate 30 EC in<br />

reducing aphid population. Akashe et al. (2007) reported that thiamethoxam 0.005 percent was<br />

effective in the control <strong>of</strong> safflower aphids. The indiscriminate and frequent application <strong>of</strong><br />

insecticides has created resistance development in the target pest, the presence <strong>of</strong> pesticide<br />

residues in seed and oil, destruction <strong>of</strong> natural enemies and different pollinators. It was,<br />

therefore necessary to evaluate the efficacy <strong>of</strong> different seed treatment insecticides as well as<br />

foliar application <strong>of</strong> insecticides to find out the insecticides harmful to the aphids and safer to<br />

the natural enemies and pollinators, especially honeybees. Therefore, the seed treatment<br />

insecticides and newer insecticides were evaluated to manage safflower aphids.<br />

Methodology<br />

A field trial was carried out to test the efficacy <strong>of</strong> insecticides against safflower aphids during<br />

the rabi season <strong>of</strong> 2020-21 and 2021-22 at the Research Farm <strong>of</strong> the Department <strong>of</strong> Agricultural<br />

Entomology, Vasantrao Naik Marathwada Krishi Vidyapeeth, Parbhani. The Seed treatment<br />

with imidacloprid 48 FS and thiamethoxam 30 FS was done before sowing and soil drenching<br />

<strong>of</strong> clothianidin 50 WDG was done 15 days after sowing as per the treatment. The sowing <strong>of</strong><br />

safflower variety PBNS-12 was done in randomized block design with three replications by<br />

dibbling at a spacing <strong>of</strong> 45x20 cm. The first spray <strong>of</strong> insecticides was applied on the appearance<br />

<strong>of</strong> a sufficient population <strong>of</strong> safflower aphids while the second spray was given at an interval<br />

<strong>of</strong> 15 days as per the treatment. The observations on the number <strong>of</strong> aphids per 5 cm apical shoot<br />

length per plant were recorded a day before as a precount and 5, 7, 10, and 14 days after<br />

spraying <strong>of</strong> insecticide on five randomly selected plants from each plot. The seed yield <strong>of</strong><br />

safflower from each plot was recorded separately at harvesting and the data on aphid count and<br />

seed yield were statistically analyzed as per the method suggested by Panse and Sukhatme<br />

(1965).<br />

Sr.<br />

No.<br />

Treatment<br />

Treatment details<br />

Dose<br />

1 Seed treatment with imidacloprid 48 FS 9 ml/kg seed<br />

2 Seed treatment with thiamethoxam 30 FS 10 ml/kg seed<br />

3 Soil drenching with clothianidin 50 WDG 2.5 g/10 lit. water<br />

4 Seed treatment with imidacloprid 48 FS and one foliar spray<br />

<strong>of</strong> spinetoram11.70 SC<br />

5 Seed treatment with imidacloprid 48 FS and one foliar spray<br />

<strong>of</strong> cyantraniliprole 10.26 OD<br />

6 Seed treatment with thiamethoxam 30 FS and one foliar spray<br />

<strong>of</strong> spinetoram11.70 SC<br />

9 ml/kg seed and 420 ml/ha<br />

9 ml/kg seed and 900 ml/ha<br />

10 ml/kg seed and 420 ml/ha<br />

Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance<br />

382 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Results<br />

7 Seed treatment with thiamethoxam 30 FS and one foliar spray<br />

<strong>of</strong> cyantraniliprole 10.26 OD<br />

8 Soil drenching with clothianidin 50 WDG and one foliar spray<br />

<strong>of</strong> spinetoram11.70 SC<br />

9 Soil drenching with clothianidin 50 WDG and one foliar spray<br />

<strong>of</strong> cyantraniliprole 10.26 OD<br />

10 ml/kg seed and 900 ml/ha<br />

2.5 g/10 lit. water<br />

and 420 ml/ha<br />

2.5 g/10 lit. water<br />

and 900 ml/ha<br />

10 Two foliar sprays <strong>of</strong> spinetoram11.70 SC 420 ml/ha<br />

11 Two foliar sprays <strong>of</strong> cyantraniliprole 10.26 OD 900 ml/ha<br />

12 Untreated control --<br />

It is revealed from results that the minimum overall mean number <strong>of</strong> aphid population/5 cm<br />

apical shoot length/plant was recorded in the treatment with two foliar sprays <strong>of</strong><br />

spinetoram11.70 SC @ 420 ml/ha (9.93 aphids/ 5 cm apical shoot length/plant) which was at<br />

par with the treatment with two foliar sprays <strong>of</strong> cyantraniliprole 10.26 OD @ 900 ml/ha (11.22<br />

aphids/ 5 cm apical shoot length/plant). The next better treatment in order <strong>of</strong> efficacy were seed<br />

treatment with thiamethoxam 30 FS @ 10 ml/kg seed & one foliar spray <strong>of</strong> spinetoram11.70<br />

SC @ 420 ml/ha and seed treatment with thiamethoxam 30 FS @ 10 ml/kg seed & one foliar<br />

spray <strong>of</strong> cyantraniliprole 10.26 OD @ 900 ml/ha which were at par with each other by recording<br />

15.08 and 17.35 aphids/ 5 cm apical shoot length/plant, respectively. However, the treatments<br />

with seed treatment with imidacloprid 48 FS @ 9 ml/kg seed & one foliar spray <strong>of</strong><br />

spinetoram11.70 SC @ 420 ml/ha , seed treatment with imidacloprid 48 FS @ 9 ml/kg seed &<br />

one foliar spray <strong>of</strong> cyantraniliprole 10.26 OD @ 900 ml/ha, soil drenching with clothianidin<br />

50 WDG & one foliar spray <strong>of</strong> spinetoram11.70 SC and soil drenching with clothianidin 50<br />

WDG & one foliar spray <strong>of</strong> cyantraniliprole 10.26 OD which were at par with each other by<br />

recording 25.21, 27.21, 29.94 and 31.96 aphids/ 5 cm apical shoot length/plant, respectively.<br />

In an untreated control, higher population <strong>of</strong> 181.13 aphids/ 5 cm apical shoot length/plant was<br />

recorded.<br />

Seed yield: The results showed that the seed yield <strong>of</strong> safflower under all the treatments were<br />

significantly superior over untreated control. The treatment with two foliar sprays <strong>of</strong><br />

spinetoram11.70 SC @ 420 ml/ha was recorded highest seed yield <strong>of</strong> 14.63 q/ha which was at<br />

par with the treatment with two foliar sprays <strong>of</strong> cyantraniliprole 10.26 OD @ 900 ml/ha (14.24<br />

q/ha). The treatments with seed treatment with thiamethoxam 30 FS @ 10 ml/kg seed & one<br />

foliar spray <strong>of</strong> spinetoram11.70 SC @ 420 ml/ha and seed treatment with thiamethoxam 30 FS<br />

@ 10 ml/kg seed & one foliar spray <strong>of</strong> cyantraniliprole 10.26 OD @ 900 ml/ha which recorded<br />

12.91 and 12.56 q/ha seed yield, respectively. The next better treatments were seed treatment<br />

with imidacloprid 48 FS @ 9 ml/kg seed & one foliar spray <strong>of</strong> spinetoram11.70 SC @ 420<br />

ml/ha, seed treatment with imidacloprid 48 FS @ 9 ml/kg seed & one foliar spray <strong>of</strong><br />

383 | Page Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

cyantraniliprole 10.26 OD @ 900 ml/ha, soil drenching with clothianidin 50 WDG & one foliar<br />

spray <strong>of</strong> spinetoram11.70 SC and soil drenching with clothianidin 50 WDG & one foliar spray<br />

<strong>of</strong> cyantraniliprole 10.26 OD which recorded seed yield in the range <strong>of</strong> 9.82 to 11.56 q/ha.<br />

Conclusion<br />

The overall results on bio efficacy <strong>of</strong> insecticides revealed that the treatments with two foliar<br />

sprays <strong>of</strong> spinetoram 11.70 SC @ 420 ml/ha and the treatment with two foliar sprays <strong>of</strong><br />

cyantraniliprole 10.26 OD @ 900 ml/ha were found most effective for the control <strong>of</strong> safflower<br />

aphid and in obtaining higher seed yield.<br />

References<br />

Akashe, V.B., Ghadge, S.M., Gud, M.A., Kale, S.D., Kankal, V.Y. and Deshpande, A.N., 2007.<br />

Efficacy <strong>of</strong> some newer insecticides for the control <strong>of</strong> safflower aphid (Uroleucon<br />

compositae Theobald). In Abst.ISOR Nation Semi. January 29-31, pp.191-192.<br />

Panse, V.G. and Sukhatme, P.V., 1965. Statistical Methods for Agricultural Workers, ICAR,<br />

New Delhi.<br />

T3-23P-1191<br />

Evaluation <strong>of</strong> STRVs under Different Crop Establishment System in Rainfed<br />

Stress-Prone Upland Rice Ecosystem <strong>of</strong> Eastern Uttar Pradesh<br />

Kajal Verma* and U. P. Singh<br />

Institute <strong>of</strong> Agricultural sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, India-221005<br />

*kajal@bhu.ac.in<br />

Globally, rice (Oryza sativa L.) is one <strong>of</strong> the most important food grains. In India, out <strong>of</strong> 44 m<br />

ha <strong>of</strong> total rice producing area about 45 per cent is irrigated, 33 per cent is rainfed lowland, 15<br />

per cent is rainfed upland and 7 per cent is flood prone. As major portion (55 per cent) <strong>of</strong> rice<br />

producing area is rainfed, crop <strong>of</strong>ten suffers from a variety <strong>of</strong> stresses. In recent past, the area<br />

under rice has decreased due to increased cost on transplanting and weeding operations. At the<br />

same time, delay in transplanting due to labour shortage and non-availability <strong>of</strong> irrigation<br />

water at the peak period causes yield reduction and less pr<strong>of</strong>it (Gangwaret al., 2008). Hence,<br />

the major challenge is to mitigate the adverse effects <strong>of</strong> changing climate so that growth in<br />

rice production can be sustained and food security can be achieved. To increase the<br />

productivity <strong>of</strong> stress-prone ecosystems, a combination <strong>of</strong> improved varieties and crop<br />

management options that are more tolerant to volatile climate under stress-prone environment<br />

is necessary to ensure food security and at the same time provide viable incomes for resource<br />

poor rice farmers (Haefeleet al., 2010, Singh et al., 2014). As all stress tolerant rice varieties<br />

Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance<br />

384 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

(STRVs) do not perform same under different establishment systems, thus site-specific<br />

experimentation is required to evaluate explore their performance. Therefore, present research<br />

evaluated appropriate crop establishment and STRVs for better stress tolerance, enhanced<br />

yield stability and pr<strong>of</strong>itability under rainfed stress-prone environment.<br />

Methodology<br />

The present investigation was carried out at the Agricultural Research Farm, Institute <strong>of</strong><br />

Agricultural Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh during kharif season<br />

<strong>of</strong> 2017 and 2018 for evaluating the performance <strong>of</strong> STRVs under different crop establishment<br />

methods in rainfed upland ecosystem. The experiment consisted <strong>of</strong> two factors i.e. STRVs and<br />

crop establishment systems. Research trial was laid out in split-plot design with three crop<br />

establishment systems i.e. puddled transplanted, direct drill seeding on flat bed, direct seeding<br />

on furrow irrigated raised bed (FIRB) in main plots and five STRVs i.e. DRR42, DRR44,<br />

Sukha dhan5, Sukhadhan 6, Sarjoo 52 in sub plots and was replicated thrice. The allocation <strong>of</strong><br />

treatments was based on principles <strong>of</strong> randomization.<br />

Results<br />

Analysis showed that significantly higher growth and yield attributes was recorded in direct<br />

seeding on raised bed than with puddling method <strong>of</strong> crop establishment. Among different<br />

STRVs, better growth and yield attributes was recorded for DRR 44 followed by DRR 42,<br />

Sarjoo 52 and Sukhadhan 6 while minimum growth and yield attributes was recorded for<br />

Sukhadhan 5. Due to better moisture retention in direct seeding on raised bed, improvement in<br />

yield attributes occurred resulting in greater stress tolerance and higher yield. The highest net<br />

return and B:C for rice was also obtained from direct seeding on raised bed followed by direct<br />

drill seeding on flat and puddled transplanting as Higher cost was incurred for tillage operations<br />

under conventional system.<br />

400<br />

350<br />

300<br />

250<br />

200<br />

150<br />

100<br />

50<br />

No. <strong>of</strong> tillers per m2 at 90 DAS<br />

Dry matter accumulation at 90 DAS(g m-1)<br />

0<br />

Crop<br />

establishment<br />

systems (CE)<br />

CE1: Puddle<br />

transplanting<br />

CE2: Direct<br />

drill seeding on<br />

flat<br />

CE3: Direct<br />

seeding on<br />

raised bed<br />

(FIRB)<br />

Varieties<br />

(STRVs)<br />

V1: DRR 42 V2: DRR 44 V3: Sukha<br />

Dhan 5<br />

V4: Sukha<br />

Dhan 6<br />

V5: Sarjoo 52<br />

Influence <strong>of</strong> STRVs and crop establishment systems on growth attributes <strong>of</strong> rice under rainfed stressprone<br />

rice ecosystem<br />

385 | Page Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Conclusion<br />

Based on the results, it could be concluded that establishment <strong>of</strong> rice by direct seeding on raised<br />

bed/direct drill seeding on flat with stress tolerant rice varieties DRR 44/DRR42 would be<br />

useful inbetter stress tolerance and higher yield stability under rainfed stress-prone<br />

environment <strong>of</strong> eastern Uttar Pradesh.<br />

References<br />

Gangwar, K.S., Gill, M.S., Tomar O.K. and Pandey. D.K. Effect <strong>of</strong> crop establishment methods<br />

on growth, productivity and soil fertility <strong>of</strong> rice (Oryza sativa) - based cropping<br />

systems. Indian J.Agron., 53(2):102-106, 2008.<br />

Haefele, S.M., A.M. Ismail, D.E. Johnson, C. Vera Cruz and B. Samson. “Crop and Natural<br />

Resource Management for Climate-Ready Rice in Unfavorable Environments:Coping<br />

with Adverse Conditions and Creating Opportunities”. Paper from the CURE<br />

Workshop on Climate Change, Siem Reap, Cambodia, 2010.<br />

Singh S., Singh U.P., Singh R.K., Haefele S. and Ismail A.M. 2014. Climate-ready rice<br />

leveraging synergy <strong>of</strong> tolerant varieties and good management for better system<br />

productivity in flood-affected rainfed lowlands. In:4 th international Rice Congress,<br />

Bangkok, Thailand, pp. 1180.<br />

T3-24P-1050<br />

High Resolution Dissection <strong>of</strong> Photosystem II Electron Transport Under<br />

Elevated CO2 and Elevated Temperature Under Carbon dioxide and<br />

Temperature Gradient Chambers (CTGC) in Pearl Millet<br />

(Pennisetum glaucum L.)<br />

Arun K. Shanker * , M. Vanaja, S. K. Yadav, M. Prabhakar and V. K. Singh<br />

ICAR- Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, Hyderabad<br />

* arunshank@gmail.com<br />

Heat stress tends to impede and restrict the efficiency <strong>of</strong> photosynthesis, chlorophyll<br />

fluorescence, and maximum photochemical quantum yield in plants based on their<br />

characteristic ability to interfere with the electron transport system in photosystem II. Elevated<br />

CO2 has beneficial effects on photosynthesis and these two situations can have multifarious<br />

effects on photosystem II. An experiment was conducted in under Carbon dioxide and<br />

Temperature Gradient Chambers in Pearl Millet. We attempted a high-resolution dissection <strong>of</strong><br />

electron transport in PSII with studies on chlorophyll a fast fluorescence kinetics and Non-<br />

Photochemical Quenching (NPQ) under elevated CO 2 and three gradients <strong>of</strong> elevated<br />

Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance<br />

386 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

temperature in pearl millet. Our results indicate that Oxygen Evolution Complex (OEC)<br />

damage is the primary effect <strong>of</strong> heat stress and is not seen in the elevated CO 2 conditions. Low<br />

exciton absorption flux in heat stress caused an electron transport traffic jam in the donor side<br />

<strong>of</strong> PSII. Our results indicate that the functional state <strong>of</strong> photosystem II has differentially<br />

sensitivity to heat and elevated CO 2. Maximum quantum yield <strong>of</strong> Photosystem II<br />

photochemistry reduced in G2 and G3 gradient chambers in both elevated temperature and<br />

elevated CO 2. C 4 plants have a higher temperature optimum for photosynthesis. The driving<br />

force for higher dry matter production under eCO 2 in combination with temperature is more<br />

due to an optimum temperature rather than elevated CO2. Elevated CO2 mitigated the adverse<br />

effect <strong>of</strong> G1(Ambient + 1.5 ± 0.5℃) on photosystem II electron transport.<br />

We bring out the mechanism by which maximum quantum yield <strong>of</strong> Photosystem II<br />

photochemistry reduced in G2 and G3 gradient chambers in both elevated temperature and<br />

elevated CO 2. It was shown that OEC was affected in the plants reflecting in low<br />

photosynthetic efficacy in the higher gradients <strong>of</strong> temperature and was not affected by elevated<br />

CO 2. The possible reason for this was seen as C4 plants have a higher temperature optimum<br />

for photosynthesis. A model (Fig.) was developed to show how photosystem II was affected<br />

by eCO2 and high temperature.<br />

Electron transport model <strong>of</strong> PSII under eCO2 and G1 and G2 gradients <strong>of</strong> high temperature<br />

387 | Page Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

T3-25P-1470<br />

Impact <strong>of</strong> Adoption on Improved Varieties <strong>of</strong> Chickpea (Cicer Arietinum)<br />

on Yield Performance Under NICRA Village <strong>of</strong> Ratlam District in Madhya<br />

Pradesh<br />

Gyanendra Pratap Tiwari, Sarvesh Tripathy* and Jitendra Bhandari<br />

Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Jaora, Ratlam, M.P-457001<br />

* sarveshtripathy@gmail.com<br />

The adoption pattern <strong>of</strong> improved varieties <strong>of</strong> chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) and their impact<br />

on farm income in NICRA village <strong>of</strong> Ratlam district with small household’s farmers spread<br />

over village Nawabganj and Sabalgrah during 2021 and 2022. Farmers <strong>of</strong> this region mostly<br />

preferred local varieties <strong>of</strong> chickpea as compared to improved varieties (JG-14 and RVH-202).<br />

The major constraints expressed by farmers in the adoption <strong>of</strong> improved varieties <strong>of</strong> chickpea<br />

included: low awareness <strong>of</strong> the new varieties; lack <strong>of</strong> pest-resistant varieties; non-availability<br />

<strong>of</strong> seeds <strong>of</strong> improved varieties; lack <strong>of</strong> access to credit; high cost <strong>of</strong> seeds; and lack <strong>of</strong> short or<br />

extra short duration varieties. The physical and financial performance <strong>of</strong> JG-14 and RVG-202<br />

were found to be better as compared to local varieties <strong>of</strong> chickpea. The result shows that the<br />

rate <strong>of</strong> adoption pattern <strong>of</strong> seed replacement <strong>of</strong> improved varieties increased up to 11% in year<br />

2022. The finding put in place a system for demonstrating the production potential <strong>of</strong> the new<br />

and promising chickpea varieties and providing timely information, credit, inputs and market<br />

support to accelerate the adoption and production <strong>of</strong> chickpeas in the state. The results also<br />

provide deep insight to stakeholders <strong>of</strong> chickpea not only to penetrate in seed markets but also<br />

help in deciding how to design an R&D program as well.<br />

T3-26P-1489<br />

Impact <strong>of</strong> Nutritional Manipulation in Cattle <strong>of</strong> Saline Coastal Areas <strong>of</strong><br />

Sundarban for Stress Management<br />

C. Majhi 1 , M.H. Molla 1 , K. Pal 1 , S. Banerjee 1 , A. Nayak 1 , P.K. Pathak 1 , B. Tudu 1 , F.H.<br />

Rahaman 2 and N.J. Maitra 3<br />

1 North 24 Parganas Krishi Vigyan Kendra, West Bengal University <strong>of</strong> Animal and Fishery Sciences,<br />

Ashokenagar, North 24 Parganas,<br />

2 ICAR-ATARI, Kolkata<br />

3 West Bengal University <strong>of</strong> Animal and Fishery Sciences, Belgachia, Kolkata<br />

kvkashoke@gmail.com<br />

Climate change is an ever-growing challenge throughout the world now-a-days. Rise <strong>of</strong><br />

temperature, recurrent events <strong>of</strong> natural calamities, erratic climatic aberration, rise <strong>of</strong> salinity<br />

in environment are leading to heat stress, decreased productive and reproductive performance,<br />

Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance<br />

388 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

increasing vector borne diseases and declining immunogenic response observed in livestock <strong>of</strong><br />

coastal areas <strong>of</strong> Sundarban. Cattle, the main milk producing animals at the area, are directly<br />

affected through different biotic and abiotic stress leading to economic loss <strong>of</strong> farmers. The<br />

present study was aimed to reduce the heat stress by nutritional manipulation through<br />

supplementation <strong>of</strong> different fodders. The study shows that among different treatments<br />

supplementation <strong>of</strong> matured Super Napier fodder @ 10 kg / day / animal with market available<br />

cattle feed @ 2 Kg / day /animal showed significant (p < 0.05) ameliorative effect against heat<br />

stress observed through body temperature, respiration rate, blood cortisol level, milk and body<br />

weight parameters within the time period <strong>of</strong> June to September.<br />

T3-27P-1188<br />

Management <strong>of</strong> Fall Armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda in Organic<br />

Sorghum Cultivation<br />

G. Shyam Prasad, J. Stanley, S. Aruna Sai, K. Srinivasa babu and B. Gangaiah<br />

ICAR- Indian Institute <strong>of</strong> Millets Research, Hyderabad- 500 030, Telangana<br />

Sorghum bicolor (L). Moench is one <strong>of</strong> the important crops for human and animal consumption,<br />

particularly in the semi-arid tropics and south Asian countries. It is grown in hot climate and<br />

best suited for drought conditions as it exhibits morphological adaptations for dry spells<br />

(Ramatoulaye et al. 2016). Sorghum is affected by many insect pests like shoot fly, stem borers,<br />

shoot bug, aphids, white grubs etc. Recently, fall armyworm (FAW), Spodoptera frugiperda<br />

(JE Smith) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) is being reported as the major pest causing economic<br />

losses. FAW is a highly polyphagous insect pest that attacks more than 80 plant species,<br />

Majorly, maize, sorghum, millet, sugarcane, and vegetable crops in India (Prasanna et al. 2018).<br />

The young caterpillars <strong>of</strong> FAW start feeding on the leaves, that shows patches on the leaves<br />

called windows. By stage 4, the caterpillar will be bigger and have reached the whorl, where it<br />

does the most damage, resulting in ragged holes in the leaves. Feeding on young plants can kill<br />

the growing point, resulting in reducing the growth <strong>of</strong> new leaves and cobs. Though there are<br />

many insecticides recommended for the management <strong>of</strong> this pest, it is needed to have a biointensive<br />

pest management module for sorghum farmers as the crop is grown mostly under<br />

organic farming condition.<br />

Methodology<br />

A field trail was conducted at research farm <strong>of</strong> ICAR - Indian Institute <strong>of</strong> Millets Research,<br />

Hyderabad, Telangana. India during two consecutive Rabi seasons <strong>of</strong> 2018-2019 and 2019-<br />

2020 to evaluate the efficacy <strong>of</strong> biocontrol agents in sorghum. The experiment was laid out in<br />

randomized block design (RBD), with seven treatments viz., T1 (Trichogramma pretiosum 1<br />

card per acre), T2 (T1 + NBAIR Bt 2%), T3 (T1 + Metarhizium anisopliae NBAIR-Ma 35,<br />

389 | Page Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

0.5%), T4 (T1 + EPN Heterorhabditis indica NBAIR H38), T5 (T1 + Pseudomonas<br />

fluorescens (Pf DWD 1%)), T6 (Insecticidal check (Emamectin benzoate 0.4g/l)) including (T<br />

7 )untreated control each replicated thrice. The commercial variety CSV 29 was grown in ~40<br />

m 2 plot size. The crop was grown following all the agronomic practices and fertilizer<br />

application as per the package <strong>of</strong> practices recommended for the zone without plant protection<br />

measures to ensure natural infestation. The treatments T6 and T7 were imposed with a buffer<br />

crop spread at 200 m from rest <strong>of</strong> the treatments. Observations were made on the whorl<br />

infestation at 20DAE (Pre-Treatment) and 30DAE, 40DAE (post-Treatment) to identify the<br />

reduction in egg patches, larval population and plant damage and percent reduction was<br />

calculated over untreated check.<br />

Results<br />

The incidence <strong>of</strong> fall armyworm was observed to be moderate and the incidence was observed<br />

from 10DAE <strong>of</strong> crop. It inflicted irregular cuts on the leaves and later stages in whorl. A<br />

significant reduction in the number <strong>of</strong> eggs laid was observed after the application <strong>of</strong> first round<br />

<strong>of</strong> treatments as compared to control in all treatments. The egg patches ranged from 0.66-2.66<br />

egg patches/ 10 plants/ plot during the first year and 0-3.0 eggs patches/ 10 plants/ plot in the<br />

second year <strong>of</strong> experimentation. By the second round <strong>of</strong> treatments egg patches were not<br />

observed across the treatments.<br />

Larvae per 10 Plants: It was found that no larva was found in T6 (insecticide) after the<br />

application <strong>of</strong> second round <strong>of</strong> treatment. The next best treatments were T2 – T. pretiosum +<br />

M. anisopliae (1.00 larvae/10 plants) which is on par with T1 - T. pretiosum + Bt (1.33) in the<br />

first year <strong>of</strong> experimentation. All the treatments had registered significant reduction in larval<br />

population with respect to untreated control and pre-treatment count.<br />

Plant damage (%): Two sprays Insecticidal treatment was found to register significant<br />

reduction in pest population and thus the plant damage also. Treatments with Bt and<br />

Metarhizium anisopliae (Ma) also registered very less damage <strong>of</strong> 1.17 and 1.27% after two<br />

rounds <strong>of</strong> application in the first year. In the second year also, 93.8 and 91.4% reduction in leaf<br />

damage over the untreated control was observed in Ma and Bt, respectively after two rounds<br />

<strong>of</strong> application. The release <strong>of</strong> egg parasitoid, Trichogramma pretiosum was found effective but<br />

not sufficient in the management <strong>of</strong> fall armyworm in our previous experiments (Jaraleño-<br />

Teniente et al., 2020). So, the release <strong>of</strong> T. pretiosum was kept constant in all the treatment,<br />

since it is not sufficient to manage the pest, spray <strong>of</strong> NBAIR Bt 2%, Metarhizium anisopliae<br />

NBAIR-Ma, EPN Heterorhabditis indica NBAIR H38 and Pseudomonas fluorescens (Pf DWD<br />

1%) were tested.<br />

Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance<br />

390 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Conclusion<br />

The results revealed that the Metarhizium anisopliae NBAIR-Ma 35 0.5% and NBAIR Bt 2%<br />

are equally effective in managing the pest. So, M. anisopliae and B. thuringiensis can be<br />

recommended for the management <strong>of</strong> fall armyworm in sorghum crop grown under organic<br />

farming.<br />

References<br />

Jaraleño-Teniente, J., Lomeli-Flores, J. R., Rodríguez-Leyva, E., BujanosMuñiz, R.,<br />

Rodríguez-Rodríguez, S. E. 2020. Egg parasitoids survey <strong>of</strong> Spodoptera frugiperda<br />

(Smith) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in maize and sorghum in Central Mexico. Insects.<br />

11:157.<br />

Prasanna, B. M., Huesing, J. E., Eddy, R., Peschke, V. M. 2018. Fall Armyworm in Africa: A<br />

Guide for Integrated Pest Management, 1 st ed.; CIMMYT: Edo Mex, Mexico.<br />

Ramatoulaye, F., Mady, C., Fallou, S., Amadou, K., Cyril, D., and Massamba, D. 2016.<br />

Production and Use Sorghum: A Literature Review. Journal <strong>of</strong> Nutritional Health &<br />

Food Science. 4(1): 1-4.<br />

T3-28P-1331<br />

Morpho-Physiological Characterization <strong>of</strong> Drought Stress Tolerance at<br />

Flowering Stage in Black Gram (Vigna mungo L. Hepper)<br />

B. Sarkar, Y. Varalaxmi, K. Tejasree, N. Jyoti Lakshmi, M. Vanaja, Salini K., Satish P.,<br />

S.S. Shishodia, M. Prabhakar A.K. Shanker, S.K. Yadav and V.K. Singh<br />

ICAR-Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, Hyderabad-500059<br />

Black gram is the fourth most important pulse crop after chickpea, pigeon pea and green<br />

gram in acreage, production in India. Drought is the major factor affecting black gram<br />

productivity specially in the era <strong>of</strong> climate change. When exposed to drought stress,<br />

plants trigger various morpho-physiological responses (Baroowa and Gogoi 2012;<br />

Baroowa et al.2016, Gurumurthy et al., 2018) to cope with stress for completing its life<br />

cycle. Although grain yield is commonly used as criterion to measure drought tolerance,<br />

dissecting yield into its contributing traits is critical for screening <strong>of</strong> germplasm and<br />

utilizing in breeding program. Drought stress affects various morpho-physiological<br />

traits like relative water content, membrane stability index, proline, apart from yield<br />

attributes, eventually adversely affecting realization <strong>of</strong> source and sink potentials<br />

(Anjum et al., 2011). Hence, it is paramount to develop drought-tolerant varieties to<br />

improve crop productivity and make it more pr<strong>of</strong>itable to the farming communities.<br />

Characterization and identification <strong>of</strong> traits are important for efficient utilization <strong>of</strong><br />

391 | Page Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

available germplasm in crop improvement program. In this context, the present study<br />

was conducted to characterize black gram genotypes for morpho-physiological and<br />

yield related traits following imposition <strong>of</strong> water stress at flowering stage for identifying<br />

tolerant genotypes and using in genetic enhancement program.<br />

Methodology<br />

A field experiment was conducted under well-watered and water stressed conditions<br />

during kharif 2021 with 40 genotypes in a randomized complete block design (RCBD)<br />

having 3 replications. The various morpho-physiological traits were recorded where a<br />

dry spell <strong>of</strong> 10 days coincided with the flowering stage. The data recorded were on<br />

various morpho-physiological traits including SPAD chlorophyll meter reading<br />

(SCMR), NDVI, CTD, fv/fm, RWC, membrane stability index (MSI), proline,<br />

malondialdehyde (MDA), yield and its attributes. The data were statistically analyzed<br />

with SAS s<strong>of</strong>tware (Version 9.3; SAS Institute, Cary, NC). Analysis <strong>of</strong> variance and<br />

least significant difference (LSD) test was applied to compare the genotypes.<br />

Results<br />

The pooled analysis <strong>of</strong> variance (ANOVA) revealed significant genotypic differences<br />

(p0.05) for all morphophysiological<br />

logical traits<br />

indicating the magnitude <strong>of</strong><br />

differences in genotypes were<br />

sufficient to select superior<br />

genotypes against drought stress.<br />

While, the genotype × treatment<br />

interaction effect was also found<br />

to be significant for most <strong>of</strong> the<br />

morpho-physiological<br />

traits except pod length<br />

and cluster number. The<br />

significant variation due to<br />

genotype, treatment and<br />

their interaction indicated<br />

that these traits were<br />

influenced by both genetic<br />

and treatment conditions.<br />

The genotypes under<br />

water stress showed<br />

Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance<br />

392 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

reduction in the various physiological and yield related traits. Physiological traits<br />

showed that proline content under control and stress conditions varied from 12–28 μg/g<br />

FW and 14–32 μg/g FW with increased accumulation under stress condition. The<br />

genotypes IPU-7-3, IPU-11-2, IPU-96-12, IPU-11-6, and IPU-13-6 accumulated 2.54 to<br />

1.49 folds more proline under stress conditions compared to control. While, MDA<br />

content under control and stress conditions varied from 6.55–16.40 μmol/g FW and<br />

9.78–23.75 μmol/g FW. The genotypes IPU-10-32, IPU-13-1, IPU-11-2, IPU-96-7 and<br />

IPU-10-21 had lower MDA content and were less affected by stress. The genotypes<br />

IPU-10-1, IPU-10-26, IPU-10-33, IPU-11-6, IPU-2-37, IPU-9-13, IPU-94-4 and LBG-<br />

623 maintained higher relative water content, membrane stability index and yield both<br />

under well-watered and water stress conditions (Table 1). The correlation analysis<br />

revealed significant positive correlations between different traits under well-water and<br />

water stress conditions. Under well-watered conditions significant positive correlations<br />

were observed for pod yield with hundred seed weight, seed yield, total biomass while<br />

hundred seed weight with total biomass and seed yield with total biomass. Under waterdeficit<br />

stress conditions significant negative correlation was observed between RWC<br />

and plant height; total biomass with harvest index.<br />

Black gram genotypes performing better both under well-watered and water deficit<br />

Genotype<br />

Relative<br />

water<br />

content (%)<br />

Membrane<br />

stability index<br />

(%)<br />

stress conditions<br />

Days to<br />

50%<br />

flowering<br />

Pod yield<br />

(g/plant)<br />

Seed yield<br />

(g/plant)<br />

100 seed<br />

weight (g)<br />

WW WD WW WD WW WD WW WD WW WD WW WD<br />

IPU-10-1 83.12 81.25 67.61 58.33 34 35 5.80 6.27 4.47 4.53 4.07 4.03<br />

IPU-10-26 78.76 77.40 63.53 52.97 33 33 6.93 6.33 5.05 4.40 4.20 4.67<br />

IPU-10-33 79.21 78.93 76.88 67.52 34 34 8.47 8.19 5.34 4.95 4.42 4.42<br />

IPU-11-6 83.50 80.11 68.06 56.56 33 33 9.98 8.13 5.12 4.17 4.81 3.88<br />

IPU-2-37 84.06 81.80 80.62 55.92 35 36 7.06 5.60 4.86 4.73 4.42 4.31<br />

IPU-9-13 78.93 78.19 64.93 58.84 34 34 6.13 6.20 5.39 4.74 4.19 3.85<br />

IPU-94-4 81.91 80.93 59.65 56.06 34 34 7.09 6.40 5.12 4.30 4.77 4.17<br />

LBG-623 79.63 74.30 68.93 65.86 35 37 7.40 6.92 5.20 4.27 4.77 4.40<br />

WW: well-watered; WD: water-deficit stress<br />

Conclusion<br />

The present study revealed differential responses for morpho-physiological and yield traits<br />

among black gram genotypes. Drought stress affected morpho-physiological traits including<br />

RWC and MSI with reduced growth and development, while parameters like proline, MDA<br />

showed enhanced activities. Genotypes maintaining similar levels <strong>of</strong> morpho-physiological<br />

activities under stress when compared with well-watered conditions can work as an important<br />

stress marker. These morpho-physiological traits may be useful for selection <strong>of</strong> drought tolerant<br />

393 | Page Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

genotypes for improved productivity in drought prone environments. Among various traits MSI<br />

and proline content were having contrasting behaviour in stress and well-water conditions<br />

indicating its role in distinguishing genotypes for stress tolerance. Among genotypes tested,<br />

IPU-10-1, IPU-10-26, IPU-10-33, IPU-11-6, IPU-2-37, IPU-9-13, IPU-94-4 and LBG-623<br />

performed better both under well-watered and water stress conditions. While, the genotypes<br />

IPU-7-3, IPU-11-2, IPU-96-12, IPU-11-6, and IPU-13-6 accumulated 2.54 to 1.49 folds more<br />

proline under stress conditions compared to control. Thus, morpho-physiological<br />

characterization <strong>of</strong> black gram may be useful for selection <strong>of</strong> drought tolerant genotypes for<br />

improved productivity in drought prone environments.<br />

References<br />

Anjum S.A., Xie X., Wang L., Saleem M.F., Man C., Lei W. 2011. Morphological,<br />

physiological and biochemical responses <strong>of</strong> plants to drought stress. Afr J Agric Res<br />

6:2026-2032<br />

Baroowa B., Gogoi N. 2012. Effect <strong>of</strong> induced drought on different growth and biochemical<br />

attributes <strong>of</strong> black gram (Vigna mungo L.) and green gram (Vigna radiata L.). J Env Res<br />

Dev 6:584–593<br />

Baroowa B., Gogoi N., Farooq M. 2016. Changes in physiological, biochemical and<br />

antioxidant enzyme activities <strong>of</strong> green gram (Vigna radiata L.) genotypes under drought.<br />

Acta Physiol Plant (2016) 38:219. DOI 10.1007/s11738-016-2230-7<br />

Gurumurthy S., Sarkar B., Vanaja M., Jyoti Lakshmi N., Yadav S.K. and Maheswari M. 2018.<br />

Morpho-physiological and biochemical changes in black gram (Vigna mungo L. Hepper)<br />

genotypes following imposition <strong>of</strong> water stress at flowering stage. Acta Physiologae<br />

Planta. 41:1-14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11738-019-2833-x<br />

T3-29P-1525<br />

Performance <strong>of</strong> Buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum Moench.) Genotypes<br />

under Varied Fertility Levels in Northern Transition Zone <strong>of</strong> Karnataka<br />

H. P Keerthi, S. A Biradar, U. K Hulihalli * and Geeta S. Tamgale<br />

College <strong>of</strong> Agriculture, UAS Dharwad 580005, Karnataka<br />

*hulihalliuk@uasd.in<br />

Fagopyrum esculentum Moench (common buckwheat) is an herbaceous erect annual plant with<br />

a diploid chromosomal number (2n = 16). It is a member <strong>of</strong> the polygonaceae family.<br />

Buckwheat is one <strong>of</strong> the most significant pseudo cereal crops <strong>of</strong> the alpine region, widely<br />

planted between 1,800 and 4,500 m above MSL during the kharif season in the middle and<br />

higher Himalayas. Buckwheat is evolved in Central Asia's temperate climate. Buckwheat is<br />

Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance<br />

394 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

grown on an area <strong>of</strong> 2.04 million hectares in the world, with production <strong>of</strong> 2.4 million tonnes<br />

and productivity is 1000 kg ha -1 . Buckwheat is grown for food and fodder in a number <strong>of</strong> Asian<br />

nations, including India. Buckwheat is primarily grown in the temperate zones <strong>of</strong> the Northern<br />

hemisphere, particularly in Russia (Oshini, 2004). It's grown in the United States, Canada,<br />

France, Germany, the United Kingdom, Denmark, Poland, the Netherlands, Sweden, Australia,<br />

Bulgaria, Romania, Italy, Japan, South Africa, Brazil, China, South Korea, Nepal and Bhutan.<br />

It is a multi-purpose crop cultivated mainly for grains (11-14 % gluten free protein) for human<br />

consumption, livestock, piggery and poultry feeds, as green manure crop, soil binding crop and<br />

as a smother crop. Except in select areas <strong>of</strong> Tamil Nadu, farmers in south India are largely<br />

unaware <strong>of</strong> the crop. Recently it is introduced in the Northern Transition Zone <strong>of</strong> Karnataka,<br />

hence to know suitable genotypes and nutrition which plays vital role to exploit its fullest<br />

potential is the need <strong>of</strong> the hour.<br />

Methodology<br />

The experiment was carried out at MARS, UAS, Dharwad during kharif 2021-22. It was laid<br />

out in split plot design with nine treatment combinations and replicated thrice. The treatments<br />

consist <strong>of</strong> three genotypes viz., G 1: Nilagiri (Dharwad selection-1), G 2: IC-79147 and G 3: PRB-<br />

1 in main plots and three fertilizer levels viz., F1: 100 % RDF (30:15:15 N:P2O5:K2O kg ha -1 ),<br />

F 2: 125 % RDF (37.5:18.75:18.75 N:P 2O 5:K 2O kg ha -1 ) and F 3: 150 % RDF (45:22.5:22.5<br />

N:P2O5:K2O kg ha -1 ) in sub plots were taken. Crop was sown during Kharif 2021 and full dose<br />

<strong>of</strong> NPK was applied at the time <strong>of</strong> sowing. The standard procedures are followed to record the<br />

yield and yield observations.<br />

Results<br />

The results <strong>of</strong> experiment was indicated that among the genotypes, IC-79147 recorded<br />

significantly higher attributes viz., number <strong>of</strong> clusters planr -1 , number <strong>of</strong> grains clusters -1 , test<br />

weight and grain yield. Higher yield attributes with IC-79147 were mainly due to a higher<br />

capacity to convert photosynthates from source to sink and a higher yield parameter in IC-<br />

79147 led to a higher grain yield. The genotype IC-79147 was on par with Nilagiri as per as<br />

grain yield was concerned. However, the straw yield was higher with PRB 1 and it was mainly<br />

due long growing period and lower harvest index. Higher net returns were recorded with IC-<br />

79147 as compared PRB 1. Gross returns and the BC ratio showed a similar pattern. Similar<br />

results were observed by Maruti et al. (2018), Among the fertility levels, application <strong>of</strong> 150 %<br />

RDF recorded significantly higher yield attributes viz., number <strong>of</strong> clusters plant -1 , number <strong>of</strong><br />

grains clusters -1 , grain yield and straw yield and it was on par with 125 % RDF. Higher yield,<br />

yield attributes and economics were due to higher nutrient application which was used by<br />

buckwheat efficiently. Among the interaction effect genotype IC-79147 with 150 per cent RDF<br />

resulted in significantly higher yield, yield attributes and economics.<br />

395 | Page Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Conclusion<br />

With this study, it was concluded that genotype IC-79147 with 150 per cent RDF can be<br />

recommended for Northern Transition Zone <strong>of</strong> Karnataka to get higher grain yield, net returns<br />

and BC ratio during Kharif season.<br />

References<br />

Maruti, Hulihalli U.K. and Aravind Kumar B.N. 2018, Production Potential <strong>of</strong> Buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum Moench)<br />

as Influenced by Genotypes and Fertilizer Levels in Northern Transition Zone <strong>of</strong> Karnataka. Int. J. Curr.<br />

Microbiol. Appl Sci. 7(09): 537-545.<br />

Oshini, 2004, The origin <strong>of</strong> cultivated buckwheat (Fagopyrum tarticumL.). Proceedings <strong>of</strong> 9th International Symposium on<br />

buckwheat. Advances in Buckwheat Resident 4. Cultivation and plant nutrition 18-22 August 2004, Congress<br />

Centre <strong>of</strong> the Agricultural University. Prague-Suchdol (Czech Republic), pp. 16-21.<br />

Number <strong>of</strong> clusters plant -1 , number <strong>of</strong> grains clusters -1 , grain yield, straw yield, net<br />

returns and B:C ratio <strong>of</strong> buckwheat as influenced by genotypes, fertilizer levels and<br />

their interaction effects<br />

Treatments<br />

Main plot (Genotypes)<br />

Number <strong>of</strong><br />

clusters<br />

plant -1<br />

Number<br />

<strong>of</strong> grains<br />

clusters -1<br />

Grain<br />

yield<br />

(kg ha -1 )<br />

Straw<br />

yield<br />

(kg ha -1 )<br />

Net<br />

returns<br />

( ha -1 )<br />

B:C<br />

ratio<br />

G 1 12.61 a* 7.22 ab 940 ab 1774 b 30214 ab 2.62 ab<br />

G 2 13.29 a 7.60 a 985 a 1831 a 32513 a 2.75 a<br />

G 3 9.39 b 6.39 b 860 b 1912 a 26337 b 2.41 b<br />

S. Em.± 0.29 0.15 16.4 25.6 846 0.05<br />

Sub-plot (Fertilizer level)<br />

F 1 10.22 b 6.14 b 760 b 1528 b 21362 b 2.18 b<br />

F 2 11.72 ab 7.17 ab 959 a 1907 a 31305 ab 2.69 ab<br />

F 3 13.35 a 7.90 a 1065 a 2083 a 36399 a 2.92 a<br />

S. Em.± 0.31 0.20 34.8 65.3 1804 0.10<br />

Interaction (G x F)<br />

G 1F 1 10.33 de 6.21 de 770 de 1467 c 21795 cd 2.20 bc<br />

G 1F 2 12.77 c 7.42 bc 959 a-d 1808 a-c 31180 abc 2.68 ab<br />

G 1F 3 14.73 ab 8.02 ab 1091 ab 2049 a 37667 ab 2.99 a<br />

G 2F 1 11.81 cd 6.46 cde 801 c-e 1506 c 23420 cd 2.29 bc<br />

G 2F 2 13.06 bc 7.78 ab 1022 ab 1895 ab 34432 ab 2.86 a<br />

G 2F 3 15.01 a 8.56 a 1131 a 2093 a 39688 a 3.09 a<br />

G 3F 1 8.53 e 5.75 e 708 e 1610 bc 18870 d 2.04 c<br />

G 3F 2 9.32 e 6.30 cde 897 b-e 2019 a 28302 bcd 2.53 abc<br />

G 3F 3 10.31 de 7.12 bcd 974 a-c 2107 a 31841 abc 2.68 ab<br />

S. Em.± 0.53 0.32 51.9 95.9 2688 0.15<br />

Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance<br />

396 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

T3-30P-1336<br />

Performance <strong>of</strong> Chickpea (Var. Phule Vikram) Under Rainfed Condition<br />

in Solapur District <strong>of</strong> Maharashtra<br />

S.G. Jadhav*, T.R.Walkunde., P.N.Madavi. and V.G. Vairagar<br />

Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Moho l(Solapur-II) Ta. Mohol Dist. Solapur<br />

Mahatma Phule Krishi Vidyapeeth, Rahuri 413 722(MS), India<br />

* sharadjadhav48@gmail.com<br />

Though chickpea is widely grown in Solapur district, various factors influence potential yield<br />

<strong>of</strong> the crop such as, faulty sowing practices, lack <strong>of</strong> knowledge about high yielding and disease<br />

resistant varieties. Lack <strong>of</strong> awareness about seed treatment, integrated nutrient management,<br />

integrated pest management and varieties suitable for mechanical harvesting and use <strong>of</strong> micro<br />

irrigation at critical growth stage etc. Above all in the district predominantly noticed problems<br />

for chickpea cultivation are high incidence <strong>of</strong> wilt, terminal drought condition, labor shortage<br />

for harvesting etc. Hence, climate resilient variety appears to be major challenges to increase<br />

productivity. This can be achieved by means <strong>of</strong> use <strong>of</strong> high yielding, climate resilient and<br />

suitable for mechanical harvesting variety and improved cultivation practices. With this<br />

background, Cluster Front line demonstrations were conducted to show the worth <strong>of</strong> high<br />

yielding, climate resilient and mechanically harvested improved variety <strong>of</strong> chickpea<br />

Methodology<br />

Technology demonstration on chickpea variety Phule Vikram was conducted by Krishi Vigyan<br />

Kendra, Mohol during 2019-2020, 2020-2021 and 2021-2022 in district <strong>of</strong> Solapur. About 100<br />

demonstration was conducted on 40 ha area during 2019-20, while total 75 demonstarion was<br />

conducted on 30 ha area each year during 2020-21 and 2021-22. In general soil <strong>of</strong> the area<br />

under study was medium to heavy. The component demonstration technology in chickpea was<br />

comprised i.e. university recommended improved variety Phule Vikram which was wilt<br />

resistant, suitable for mechanical harvesting, high yielding. In the demonstration, one control<br />

plot was also kept where farmers practices was carried out. The demonstration were conducted<br />

to study the technology gap between the potential yield and demonstrated yield, extension gap<br />

between demonstrated yield and yield under existing practice and technology index. The yield<br />

data were collected from both the demonstration and farmers practice by random crop cutting<br />

method and analyzed by using simple statistical tools. The percent increase yield, technology<br />

gap, extension gap and technology index were calculated by using following formula as per<br />

Samui et al., (2000), as given below-<br />

397 | Page Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Percent increase in yield =<br />

Demonstration yield – Farmers practice yield<br />

Farmers practice yield<br />

X 100<br />

Technology gap = Potential yield - Demonstration yield<br />

Extension gap = Demonstration yield –Farmers practice plot yield<br />

Results<br />

Technology index (%) =<br />

Technology gap<br />

Potential yield X100<br />

Cluster Frontline demonstrations studies were carried out in Solapur district <strong>of</strong> Maharashtra<br />

state in Rabi season from 2019-20 to 2020-2021, 2021-22. During three years <strong>of</strong> technologies<br />

results obtained are presented in Table 1. The results revealed that the demonstration on<br />

chickpea an average seed yield recorded 1322.66 kg/ha under demonstrated plots as compare<br />

to farmers practice 983.33 kg/ha. The highest seed yield in the demonstration plot was 1610<br />

kg/ha during 2021-22. The average yield <strong>of</strong> chickpea increased 34.87 per cent (Table 1). These<br />

results clearly indicated that the higher average seed yield in demonstration plots compared to<br />

farmers practice due to integrated crop management practices and awareness <strong>of</strong> wilt resistant<br />

and high yielding Phule Vikram variety. Adoption <strong>of</strong> scientific package <strong>of</strong> practices like seed<br />

treatment, integrated nutrient management, bio-pesticide, micro irrigation at critical growth<br />

stage, seed treatment with bio-fertilizers and need based right plant protection practices resulted<br />

in higher yields.<br />

Based on observation made, extension gap, technology gap and technology index were worked<br />

out. The extension gap observed during different years was 292, 296 and 430 kg/ha during<br />

2019-20, 2020-21 and 2021-22 respectively. On an average extension gap observed in three<br />

years under CFLD implemented villages was 339.33 kg/ha. The highest extension gap 430<br />

kg/ha was recorded in 2021-22 followed by 296 kg/ha (2020-21) and 292 kg/ha (2019-20).<br />

Technology gap is the difference between potential yield and demonstrated plot yield. The<br />

technology gap observed during different years was 618, 324 and 40 kg/ha during 2019-20,<br />

2020-21 and 2021-22 respectively. On an average technology gap observed in three years under<br />

FLD implemented villages was 327.33 kg/ha. The highest technology gap 618 kg/ha was<br />

recorded in 2019-20 followed by 324 kg/ha (2020-21) and 40 kg/ha (2021-22).<br />

On an average technology index observed was 19.83 % for three years where cluster front line<br />

demonstrations were conducted. This shows the efficiency and effectiveness <strong>of</strong> the improved<br />

technologies as a result <strong>of</strong> successful technical interventions to increase the yield performance<br />

<strong>of</strong> chickpea. Economics returns related to input and output prices <strong>of</strong> commodities prevailed<br />

during the study period, were recorded. The cultivation <strong>of</strong> chickpea under improved<br />

technologies CFLD gave higher net returns <strong>of</strong> Rs. 20358, Rs. 27626 and Rs. 40730 per hectare<br />

Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance<br />

398 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

as against to farmers practices i.e., Rs. 9020, Rs. 11530 and Rs 16514 per hectare during the<br />

years 2019-20, 2020-21 and 2021-22 respectively.<br />

The Benefit: cost ratio <strong>of</strong> chickpea observed during different years 2019-20, 2020-21 and 2021-<br />

22 under improved cultivation practices were 1.81, 1.69 and 1.93 respectively while it was<br />

1.39, 1.28 and 1.36 under farmers practice for the respective years. The highest B:C ratio in<br />

demo plots is because <strong>of</strong> higher yields obtained under improved technologies compared to<br />

farmers practices during all the three years.<br />

Yield, technology gap, extension gap and technology index in chickpea cultivation<br />

Year<br />

Potential<br />

Yield<br />

(Kg/ha)<br />

Average seed yield<br />

(Kg/ha)<br />

Demo<br />

Farmers<br />

Practice<br />

during 2019 to 2022<br />

Percent<br />

increase<br />

Technology<br />

gap<br />

(Kg/ha)<br />

Extension<br />

gap<br />

(Kg/ha)<br />

Technology<br />

index (%)<br />

2019-20 1650 1032 740 39.45 618 292 37.45<br />

2020-21 1650 1326 1030 28.73 324 296 19.63<br />

2021-22 1650 1610 1180 36.44 40 430 2.42<br />

Mean 1650 1322.66 983.33 34.87 327.33 339.33 19.83<br />

Economic impact <strong>of</strong> chickpea cultivated under CFLD and Farmers practice during<br />

2019 to 2022<br />

Year<br />

No. <strong>of</strong><br />

Demo<br />

Area<br />

(ha)<br />

Gross income<br />

Rs./ha.<br />

Demo<br />

Farmers<br />

Practice<br />

Net income Rs./ha.<br />

Demo<br />

Farmers<br />

Practice<br />

Demo<br />

B: C Ratio<br />

Farmers<br />

Practice<br />

2019-20 100 40 45408 31820 20358 9020 1.81 1.39<br />

2020-21 75 30 67626 52530 27626 11530 1.69 1.28<br />

2021-22 75 30 84230 61714 40730 16514 1.93 1.36<br />

Mean 83.33 33.33 65754 48688 29571 12354 1.81 1.34<br />

Conclusion<br />

Chickpea variety Phule Vikram gave higher seed yield, gross monetary returns, net monetary<br />

returns and B: C ratio under rainfed condition over farmers practice.<br />

399 | Page Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Performance <strong>of</strong> Chickpea Varieties Under Late Sown Condition<br />

S.V. Thombre 1 , B.V. Asewar 2 , V.V. Goud 2 , K.A. Chavan 2 and S.G. Mane 2<br />

Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance<br />

1 VNMKV Parbhani, Maharashtra, India<br />

2 Dr. PDKV Akola-444 104 Maharashtra, India<br />

T3-31P-1418<br />

Chickpea is cool season crop. It’s yields and quality are mostly depending on climatic<br />

parameters and time <strong>of</strong> sowing. It is short durational crop and requires relatively low<br />

temperature for its optimum growth. In India, mid-October to mid-November is ideal period<br />

for sowing chickpea. Any deviation from this period causes conspicuous reduction in yield.<br />

Due to global warming, temperature is increasing day by day, also the rainfall pattern is<br />

disturbed and the rainy season is extended up to first fortnight <strong>of</strong> November. As a result,<br />

duration <strong>of</strong> winter season is reduced. In such condition, there is a need to adjust the sowing<br />

date with suitable cultivars <strong>of</strong> chickpea for obtaining higher yields. Hence field experiment<br />

entitled “To Study the Effect <strong>of</strong> Sowing Dates on Growth and Yield <strong>of</strong> Chickpea Varieties<br />

Under Late Sown Condition” was conducted at Pulse Research Unit, Dr. Panjabrao Deshmukh<br />

Krishi Vidyapeeth, Akola.<br />

Methodology<br />

The field experiment was conducted during rabi 2017-2018 at Pulse Research Unit, Dr.<br />

Panjabrao Deshmukh Krishi Vidyapeeth, Akola. The experiment was laid out in factorial<br />

randomized block design with three replications consisting <strong>of</strong> twenty-eight treatment<br />

combinations in each. The treatments consist <strong>of</strong> four sowing dates (15 th November, 30 th<br />

November, 15 th December and 30 th December) and seven chickpea varieties i.e. (PDKV<br />

Kanchan, Phule Vikram, BDN 797, AKG 70, RVG 202, RVG 203 and BDN 9-3). The soil<br />

experimental field was clayey in texture, low available nitrogen (184.58 kg/ha), medium in<br />

available phosphorus (16.21 kg ha -1 ) and high available potassium (375.43 kg ha -1 ) and<br />

slightly alkaline in reaction (pH 8.2). The gross and net plot size were 3.6 x 3.00 m 2 and 3.0 x<br />

2.8 m 2 , respectively. The chickpea crop was sown as per treatment by dibbling by one seed<br />

per hill at spacing <strong>of</strong> 30 x 10 cm 2 . Recommended fertilizer dose was applied.<br />

Results<br />

Effect <strong>of</strong> sowing dates : Different sowing time had a pr<strong>of</strong>ound influence on the grain yield.<br />

Significantly superior grain yield (1737 kg ha -1 ) was obtained when crop was sown on 15 th<br />

November than later sowing time <strong>of</strong> 30 th November, 15 th December and 30 th December. Crop<br />

sown on 30 th December recorded the lowest grain yield (653 kg ha -1 ). The mean values were<br />

higher when the crop was sown on 15 th November for all vegetative and reproductive attributes<br />

indicating that 15 th November sowing enabled the crop to express the inherent potential to the<br />

400 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

maximum as compared to later sowings. Ganguly and Bhattacharya (2001) have noted<br />

similar decisive effect <strong>of</strong> sowing time on chickpea growth and development and reported<br />

reductions in various morpho-physiological attributes with delayed sowing due to less<br />

favourable weather variables. There was significant variation in mean straw yield due to sowing<br />

dates. The higher straw yield recorded by 15 th November sowing date, which was found to be<br />

on par with sowing on 15 th December. The lowest straw yield (978 kg ha -1 ) recorded on 30 th<br />

December.<br />

The gross monetary returns were significantly influenced by different sowing dates.<br />

Significantly higher gross monetary return (Rs 78938 ha -1 ) was obtained by crop sown at 15 th<br />

November over rest <strong>of</strong> the sowing dates. The lowest value <strong>of</strong> gross monetary returns was<br />

recorded on sowing time 30 th December (Rs 31273.91 ha -1 ). The net monetary return was<br />

significantly influenced with sowing dates. The highest net monetary return (Rs 55846 ha -1 )<br />

was recorded by 15 th sowing over rest <strong>of</strong> the sowing dates. The highest benefit: cost ratio (3.42)<br />

was recorded at 15 th November sowing. The lowest value was recorded at 30 th December<br />

sowing treatment.<br />

Effect <strong>of</strong> varieties: There was statistically significant variation in seed yield due to varieties.<br />

The highest grain yield (1460 kg ha -1 ) was recorded in variety RVG 203 which was found at<br />

par with variety RVG<br />

202. However lowest grain yield (1207 kg ha -1 ) was produced by variety AKG 70. Difference<br />

in straw due to different varieties was significant. Variety RVG 203 recorded significantly higher<br />

straw yield (1875 kg ha -1 ), which was at par with variety RVG 202, BDN 797, and Phule<br />

Vikram. The lowest straw yield (1559 kg ha -1 ) observed in variety AKG 70. The cost <strong>of</strong><br />

cultivation for all varieties, was Rs. 23092 ha -1 . Chickpea variety RVG 203 significantly<br />

recorded higher gross monetary returns <strong>of</strong> (Rs 66758 ha -1 ) as compared to remaining varieties.<br />

The highest net monetary return (Rs 43666 ha -1 ) was recorded by RVG 203 variety over rest<br />

<strong>of</strong> the varieties. The highest benefit: cost ratio (2.89) was recorded in RVG 203 variety at rest <strong>of</strong><br />

the varieties. The lowest value <strong>of</strong> benefit: cost ratio (2.41) was recorded in AKG 70. The<br />

interaction effect between sowing dates and varieties were found to be non-significant in straw<br />

yield, except in grain yield<br />

401 | Page Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Effect <strong>of</strong> sowing dates on yield and economics <strong>of</strong> chickpea varieties (late sown)<br />

Treatment<br />

Grain<br />

Yield (kg<br />

ha -1 )<br />

Straw<br />

yield<br />

(kg ha -1 )<br />

Gross<br />

monetary<br />

return<br />

(Rs ha -1 )<br />

Net<br />

monetary<br />

return (Rs<br />

ha -1 )<br />

Benefit:<br />

cost ratio<br />

D1- 15 Nov (46 MW) 1737 2120 78938 55846 3.42<br />

D2- 30 Nov (48 MW) 1578 2000 71957 48865 3.12<br />

D3- 15 Dec (50 MW) 1442 1969 65958 42866 2.86<br />

D4- 30 Dec (52 MW) 653 978 31273 8181 1.35<br />

S.E. (m)± 14.84 24.33 716 718 -<br />

C.D. at 5 % 43.53 71.35 2102 2107 -<br />

V1- PDKV Kanchan 1319 1733 60562 37470 2.62<br />

V2- Phule Vikram 1354 1818 62105 39013 2.69<br />

V3- BDN 797 1313 1708 60294 37202 2.61<br />

V4- AKG 70 1207 1559 55645 32553 2.41<br />

V5- RVG 202 1416 1842 64811 41719 2.81<br />

V6- RVG 203 1460 1875 66758 43666 2.89<br />

V7- BDN 9-3 1398 1834 64049 40957 2.77<br />

S.E. (m) ± 19.63 32.18 948 950 -<br />

C. D. at 5 % 57.59 94.39 2780 2788 -<br />

Conclusion<br />

S.E. (m) ± 39.27 64.36 1896.15 1901.41 -<br />

C.D.at 5 % 115.17 NS NS NS NS<br />

GM 1353 1767 62032 38940<br />

From the present investigation it is concluded that sowing at 15 th November was better than<br />

rest <strong>of</strong> the sowing dates in experiment. Also, it was convinced that late sowing would reduce<br />

the dry matter production and yield irrespective <strong>of</strong> the varieties. Among the varieties the<br />

highest yield was recorded by the variety RVG 203 irrespective <strong>of</strong> the date <strong>of</strong> sowing. Hence<br />

it is suggested that the variety RVG 203 could be preferred over other varieties to get high<br />

yield under late sown condition.<br />

References<br />

Ganguly, S.B. and Bhattacharya, A. 2001. Effect <strong>of</strong> physiological traits on chickpea yield<br />

under normal and late seeding. Legume Res., 24(1): 6-10.<br />

Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance<br />

402 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

T3-32P-1223<br />

PGPR Strain Bacillus subtilis (Bbv57) Controls Stalk Rot <strong>of</strong> Maize Caused<br />

by Fusarium verticillioides<br />

Radhajeyalakshmi Raju 1* , Sathyasheela Veluchamy 1 , Selvakumar<br />

Thambiyannan 1 , Satheeshkumar Natesan 1 , and Karthikeyan Gandhi 2<br />

1 Maize Research Station, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Vagarai-624613<br />

2 Department <strong>of</strong> Plant Pathology, Center for Plant Protection Studies,<br />

Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore-641003<br />

* radhajeyalakshmi@hotmail.com<br />

The most important diseases associated with maize are caused by fungi, which are primarily<br />

represented by the genus Fusarium. In India, the disease is prevalent in most <strong>of</strong> the maize<br />

growing areas, particularly in rainfed areas viz., Jammu and Kashmir, Punjab, Haryana, Delhi,<br />

Rajasthan, Madhya Pradesh, Uttar Pradesh, Bihar, West Bengal, Andhra Pradesh, Tamil Nadu<br />

and Karnataka, where water stress occurs after flowering stage <strong>of</strong> the crop (Singh et al., 2012).<br />

The incidence <strong>of</strong> Post Flowering Stalk Rot complex (Charcoal rot, Fusarium stalk rot, Late<br />

wilt) was observed to be varying from 5 to 40 per cent at different parts <strong>of</strong> the country (Lal et<br />

al. 1998). The annual loss due to maize diseases in India was estimated to the tune <strong>of</strong> 13.2 to<br />

39.5%. The estimated loss due to Fusarium stalk rot has been reported as 38% in total yield.<br />

Irrespective public and private bred hybrids all are succumbing to severe stalk rot. Fusarium<br />

stalk rot was observed in the plant age group <strong>of</strong> 55 to 65 days which coincides with tasseling<br />

and silking and immediately followed grain formation stage. The soil borne pathogen led to<br />

breakage <strong>of</strong> stalk rotting, lodging and premature death <strong>of</strong> the infested plants. Hence, the present<br />

study was undertaken with an objective to work out management strategies using Bacillus as<br />

one <strong>of</strong> the components for this threatening disease.<br />

Methodology<br />

The present investigation was carried out during 2019 – 2020 at Maize Research Station,<br />

Vagarai, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University. Isolations was done by plating surface sterilized<br />

(4 per cent sodium hydrochloride) small pieces <strong>of</strong> infected tissues on Potato Dextrose Agar<br />

(PDA) medium. Purification <strong>of</strong> cultures was made by hyphal tip method.<br />

Inoculations should be made with <strong>of</strong> 45-50 days old plants just after flowering stage, in the<br />

lower internodes (second) above the soil level. Disease symptoms appeared in the inoculated<br />

plants about 20-25 days after inoculation. The disease intensity and severity is recorded<br />

following 1-9 rating scale (Meena Shekhar & Sangit, 2012). 1 - Healthy or slight discolouration<br />

at the site <strong>of</strong> inoculation, .2 - Up to 50% <strong>of</strong> the inoculated internode is discoloured, 3 - 51-75%<br />

<strong>of</strong> the inoculated internode is discoloured. 4 - 76-100% <strong>of</strong> the inoculated internode is<br />

403 | Page Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

discoloured, 5 - Less than 50% discolouration <strong>of</strong> the adjacent internode, 6 - More than 50%<br />

discolouration <strong>of</strong> the adjacent internode, 7 -discolouration <strong>of</strong> three internodes, 8 - discolouration <strong>of</strong><br />

four internodes, 9 - discolouration <strong>of</strong> five or more internodes and premature death <strong>of</strong> plant.<br />

To assess the field performance <strong>of</strong> bioagents, the trials were conducted at Maize Research<br />

Station,Vagari, Dindigul region <strong>of</strong> Tamil Nadu namely in randomized block design with three<br />

replications maintaining spacing <strong>of</strong> 60 cm between rows and 20 cm between plants. The bioagents<br />

T.asperellam (1x10 4 cfu/g) and B.subtilis (1x10 5 cfu/g) were applied in the soil before sowing @<br />

200g/m 2 . Unamended plots served as check. Seeds were treated with the slurry <strong>of</strong> carbendazim<br />

(0.2%) and bioagents <strong>of</strong> talc based formulation viz., T.asperellam (4g/kg), B.subtilis (10g/kg). Soil<br />

application <strong>of</strong> T.asperellam and B.subtilis was done @ 2.5kg/ha just before sowing. The<br />

fungitoxicants were applied in the form <strong>of</strong> spray on the above ground parts <strong>of</strong> the plants. Two foliar<br />

sprays, first two days after inoculation followed by the second 15 days later were made.<br />

Observations on disease severity were recorded 45 days after tooth pick inoculation <strong>of</strong> the pathogen<br />

following 1-9 scale devised by (Meena Shekhar & Sangit,2012). Disease scoring was done until<br />

cob development stage.<br />

Results<br />

In vivo studies on the efficacy <strong>of</strong> Bacillus subtilis (Bbv57) strain on Post Flowering Stalk Rot <strong>of</strong><br />

Maize caused by Fusarium verticillioides in maize were conducted under artificial epiphytotic<br />

conditions at Maize Research Station, Vagarai where the disease incidence was 3-10%. The<br />

experimental results revealed the reduction <strong>of</strong> 2.9% with increased yield <strong>of</strong> 6.5 tonnes/ha in<br />

Bacillus subtilis (Bbv57) treated plots compared to untreated control, which showed 5.1% disease<br />

incidence (Table), with low yield <strong>of</strong> 5.6 tonnes/ha. Bacillus subtilis one <strong>of</strong> the biocontrol agent<br />

found to colonize the roots <strong>of</strong> Maize and to control Fusarium at early stages <strong>of</strong> crop growth with<br />

high competitive ability in terms <strong>of</strong> colonizing the roots @ 1.4 x 10 7 cfu / g / root.Bacillus subtilis<br />

one <strong>of</strong> the biocontrol agents found to colonize the roots <strong>of</strong> Maize and to control Fusarium at early<br />

stages <strong>of</strong> crop growth with highly competitive ability in terms <strong>of</strong> colonizing the roots 10 7 cfu / g /<br />

root (Data not shown).<br />

In vivo efficacy <strong>of</strong> Bbv 57 strain against Fusarium stalk rot <strong>of</strong> maize under artificial<br />

Epiphytotic condition<br />

S.No Treatment PDI (%) Yield (kg/ha) C:B ratio<br />

1 ST + SA with Trichoderma asperellam (Tv1) 3.25 6367 1:1.17<br />

2 ST + SA with Bacillus subtilis (Bs1) 2.00 6517 1:2.10<br />

3 ST + SA with Carbendazim (0.2%) 4.13 6302 1:1.10<br />

4 Untreated control 7.50 5573<br />

CD (0.05%) 1.05 1912<br />

*ST: Seed Treatment; SA: Soil Application<br />

Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance<br />

404 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Conclusion<br />

The present investigation highlighted the potentialities <strong>of</strong> talc-based formulations <strong>of</strong> Bacillus<br />

subtilis obtained from Department <strong>of</strong> Plant Pathology, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University,<br />

Coimbatore-641003, Tamil Nadu, India in managing disease <strong>of</strong> maize. Seed treatment and soil<br />

application <strong>of</strong> Bacillus subtilis reduced disease incidence under in vivo conditions with high<br />

yield and the same isolate may be recommended for ec<strong>of</strong>riendly management <strong>of</strong> maize Post<br />

Flowering Stalk Rot in dryland ecosystems.<br />

References<br />

Lal, S., Leon, D. C., Saxena, V. K., Singh, S. B., Singh, N. N., Vasal, S. K. 1998. Maize stalk<br />

rot complexes: Innovative Breeding Approaches. Proc Seventh Asian Regional Maize<br />

Workshop, Los Banos, Philippines<br />

Meena Shekhar and Sangit. 2012. Inoculation methods and disease rating scales for maize<br />

disease. Directorate <strong>of</strong> Maize Research (Indian Council <strong>of</strong> Agricultural Research) Pusa<br />

Campus, New Delhi – 110 012 (India)<br />

Munkvold, G. P., and Desjardins, A. E. 1997. Fumonisins in maize. Can we reduce their<br />

occurrence?. Plant Dis. 81: 556-584.<br />

Singh, N., Rajendran, A., Meena, S., and Mittal, G. 2012. Biochemical response and hostpathogen<br />

relation <strong>of</strong> stalk rot fungi in early stages <strong>of</strong> maize (Zea mays L). African J<br />

Biotech. 11(82): 14837-14843.<br />

T3-33P-1211<br />

Physiological Parameters and Key Root Traits Contributing to the Yield<br />

Potential <strong>of</strong> Sorghum in the Northern Dry Zone <strong>of</strong> Karnataka<br />

R.S. Venkatesha 1 , B.O. Kiran 2 , V.H. Ashvathama 1 , B.R. Brahmesh Reddy 1 ,<br />

S.B. Patil 2 , R.B. Jolli 2 , R. Navyashree 1 and C.M. Nawalagatti 1<br />

1 University <strong>of</strong> Agricultural Sciences Dharwad 580 005, Karnataka<br />

2 Regional Agricultural Research Station Vijayapura 586 101, Karnataka<br />

Sorghum, which is locally known as jowar, it is generally grown in both kharif and rabi<br />

seasons. The major states contributing to national sorghum acreage, during rabi season, are<br />

Karnataka and Maharashtra. The productivity <strong>of</strong> sorghum in Karnataka recorded 1194 kg ha -1<br />

with area <strong>of</strong> 8.2 lakh hectares contributing to 9.8 lakh tons to India’s total sorghum production.<br />

Drought can reduce crop productivity which leading to lower income for farmers. Yield<br />

reduction can vary between 34 and 68 % depending on the developmental timing <strong>of</strong> the drought<br />

stress. The rabi sorghum is generally cultivated under stored and receding soil moisture with<br />

405 | Page Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

raising temperature at post-flowering stage.it experiences both the soil and atmospheric<br />

drought which is one <strong>of</strong> the major constraints responsible for destabilizing the rabi sorghum<br />

productivity. It has been documented that root growth, leaf area development and osmotic<br />

adjustment under stress are some <strong>of</strong> the guidelines characterizing for stress tolerance. The<br />

plasticity <strong>of</strong> root growth and development in response to changing moisture and nutrient status<br />

<strong>of</strong> the soil provide opportunities for exploring natural variation to identify beneficial root traits<br />

to enhance plant productivity in agricultural systems. Plant roots play an important role in plant<br />

growth by exploiting soil resources via the uptake <strong>of</strong> water and nutrients. Root traits such as<br />

root length, root volume, root density, and root fresh and dry weight are considered as useful<br />

traits for improving plant productivity under drought conditions.<br />

Methodology<br />

The experiment was conducted at Regional Agricultural Research Station, Vijayapura situated<br />

16°49’N and 76° 34’E with an altitude <strong>of</strong>678 meters above the mean sea level. The experiment<br />

was conducted in RCBD with three replications with 20 sorghum genotypes for physiological<br />

characterization and identification <strong>of</strong> key root traits contributing to yield and yield attributing<br />

characters. The water stress was induced by withholding irrigation post-40 days after sowing.<br />

The chlorophyll content was estimated using method suggested by Barnes et al. (1992) while<br />

relative water content was estimated by the method suggested by Barrs and Weatherly (1962).<br />

The membrane injury index was calculated by following the protocol <strong>of</strong> Kocheva et al. (2004).<br />

The root length was measured physically with a scale, root volume was measured by water<br />

displacement method while the dry mass was measured by drying the roots in the hot air oven<br />

at 70℃ for 72 hours intermittently after taking the fresh weight.<br />

Results<br />

The chlorophyll content <strong>of</strong> the leaf is expressed from the SPAD index, chlorophyll a,<br />

chlorophyll b and total chlorophyll content. Figure 1 represents the relationships <strong>of</strong><br />

physiological parameters with the grain yield. It revealed that the grain yield has significant<br />

positive association with chlorophyll a content (0.99), chlorophyll b content (0.86), total<br />

chlorophyll content (0.98) and SPAD index (0.95). This is representative that the<br />

photoassimilates being produced in the leaf tissues is converted into the grain yield. The total<br />

chlorophyll content has also shown significant positive associations with the yield attributes<br />

such as test weight (0.98) and harvest index (0.94). The chlorophyll content does not show<br />

significant positive association with the panicle weight (0.03). The significant positive<br />

association <strong>of</strong> the chlorophyll content with the harvest index describes the efficient partitioning<br />

<strong>of</strong> photoassimilates to the panicle. The relative water content has also shown a significant<br />

positive association with the grain yield (0.97) and the number <strong>of</strong> grains per plant (0.97). This<br />

is indicative <strong>of</strong> the plant that a higher water content in the leaf tissues under drought contributes<br />

Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance<br />

406 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

to the efficient functioning <strong>of</strong> the cell organelle which is reciprocated in the relationship <strong>of</strong> the<br />

membrane injury index with the physiological and yield attributes. The membrane injury index<br />

has shown to have a strong negative relationship with the relative water content (-0.97), total<br />

chlorophyll content (-0.98), grain yield (-0.98) and the number <strong>of</strong> grains per plant (-0.98). The<br />

sorghum genotypes capable <strong>of</strong> avoiding damages to the membranes are more capable <strong>of</strong><br />

producing photo-assimilates and reducing water losses from the leaf tissues in-turn resulting in<br />

better yields. Figure 2 describes the relationships <strong>of</strong> the root parameters such as root length,<br />

root volume, root diameter and root biomass. The grain yield has shown a positive relationship<br />

with the root length (0.69), root volume (0.78), root biomass (0.89 for root fresh weight and<br />

0.71 for root dry weight). The longer roots are capable <strong>of</strong> absorbing water from the deeper<br />

layers <strong>of</strong> soil regime when they face reduced availability <strong>of</strong> moisture in the upper layers. The<br />

large volume and greater biomass represent the superior establishment <strong>of</strong> the roots aiding the<br />

sorghum plants to better absorb the water and nutrients from the soil. The negative association<br />

<strong>of</strong> the root diameter with the grain yield (-0.41) is because the spreading <strong>of</strong> roots in the upper<br />

layers <strong>of</strong> the soil regime is not beneficial to plant growth.<br />

407 | Page Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Conclusion<br />

Yield is a variable dependent on the crucial physiological and root parameters for efficient<br />

production <strong>of</strong> photoassimilates and their partitioning.<br />

References<br />

Barrs, H.D and Weatherly, P.E. 1962. A re-examination <strong>of</strong> relative turgidity for estimating<br />

water deficits in leaves. Aus. J. Bio. Sci., 413-428.<br />

Barnes, J.D., Blaguer, L., Manrique, E., Elvira, S and Davison,,A.W. 1992. A reappraisal <strong>of</strong><br />

the use <strong>of</strong> DMSO for the extraction and determination <strong>of</strong> chlorophyll a and chlorophyll<br />

b in lichens and higher plants. Env. Exp. Bot., 32:85-100<br />

Kocheva, K., Lambrev, P., Georgiev, G., Goltsev, V. and Karabaliev, M. 2004. Evaluation <strong>of</strong><br />

chlorophyll fluorescence and membrane injury index in the leaves <strong>of</strong> barley cultivars<br />

under osmotic stress. 63: 121-124.<br />

Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance<br />

408 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

T3-34P-1554<br />

Productivity Enhancement <strong>of</strong> Lentil (Lens esculenta Moench) in Rainfed<br />

Agro-ecosystem in Koshi Region <strong>of</strong> Bihar<br />

K.M. Singh 1 *, Md. Nadeem Akhtar 1 and Amarendra Kumar 2<br />

1 Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Agwanpur, Saharsa -852201, Bihar<br />

2 ICAR-ATARI, Zone IV, Patna<br />

*kmsingh66@gmail.com<br />

Lentil (Lens esculenta Moench.) is an important rabi season pulse crop <strong>of</strong> Bihar. Farmers<br />

generally go for sole and paira cropping <strong>of</strong> lentils under low fertility and poorly managed soil<br />

in rainfed agro-ecosystem in the Koshi region resulting in poor yield <strong>of</strong> the crop. These areas<br />

are also vulnerable to drought and flood. The present investigation conducted as an On-Farm<br />

trial on farmer’s fields during 2019-20 & 2021-22 revealed that the technology <strong>of</strong> Improved<br />

variety (HUL 57) + Recommended Fertilizer (20:40.:20 kg N: P: K/ha) + Bi<strong>of</strong>ertilizer<br />

(Rhizobium and PSB@ 1 liter/ha) + Boron 1 kg ai/ha enhanced the productivity <strong>of</strong> lentil from<br />

the farmers level <strong>of</strong> 6.50 q/ha to the tune <strong>of</strong> 11.50 q/ha. This could be achieved with a better<br />

expression <strong>of</strong> yield contributing factors (branches/ plant, pod/plant, seed/pod, 1000-seed wt.)<br />

due to the balanced nutrition <strong>of</strong> plants. The economics <strong>of</strong> study also realized higher net return<br />

(Rs 38000/-) and B: C ratio (2.94) under the technology option <strong>of</strong> improved variety (HUL 57)<br />

+ RDF+ Bi<strong>of</strong>ertilizer (Rhizobium culture, PSB) + Boron 1 kg ai/ha in comparison to farmer’s<br />

practice. The application <strong>of</strong> recommended fertilizer along with bi<strong>of</strong>ertilizer (Rhizobium &<br />

PSB) has also contributed to improvement in soil fertility parameters.<br />

T3-35P-1426<br />

Productivity Enhancement Using Drought Tolerant Banana Variety<br />

Through Frontline Demonstrations in Perambalur District <strong>of</strong> Tamilnadu<br />

V. Sangeetha, V.E. Nethaji Mariyappn and M. Punithavathi<br />

Indian Council <strong>of</strong> Agricultural Research Hans Roever KVK, Perambalur District, Tamil Nadu<br />

Banana is an important fruit crop in Kurumbalur village <strong>of</strong> Perambalur district, Tamil Nadu.<br />

The productivity is low due to occurrence <strong>of</strong> drought during critical period <strong>of</strong> growth stage <strong>of</strong><br />

banana. Also, major part <strong>of</strong> the village is affected with saline irrigation water. Thus affects the<br />

soil properties and inhibit the uptake <strong>of</strong> nutrients and leads to reduction in yield. Therefore,<br />

efforts have been made to demonstrate improved drought tolerant banana variety ‘Kavery saba’<br />

to increase productivity which is also suitable for saline, sodic and marginal soils through front<br />

line demonstration. The variety Kaveri saba was released by NRC Banana, Trichy during the<br />

year 2019. The present study was carried out by Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Perambalur, Tamil<br />

Nadu to assess the impact <strong>of</strong> popularization <strong>of</strong> Banana variety Kaveri saba. Results showed<br />

409 | Page Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

that, the Banana variety Kaveri saba was performed well in Kurumbalur hamlets <strong>of</strong> Perambalur<br />

district also given the high yield under less irrigated condition during rabi season (2020-22).<br />

An average yield <strong>of</strong> 468.56 q ha -1 was recorded in front line demonstration and in farmer<br />

practices it was just 392.23 q ha -1 . Thus, the average technology gap, extension gap and<br />

technology index <strong>of</strong> 121.44, 76.33 and 20.50 percent were observed between demonstration<br />

and farmer practices. The average yield <strong>of</strong> banana increased by 20.58 percent over farmers'<br />

practices. Moreover, farmers inferred that the fruits have high market preference and fetching<br />

premium price owing to its good keeping quality with green life <strong>of</strong> 7-8 days.<br />

T3-36P-1240<br />

Response <strong>of</strong> Clusterbean (Gum Gaur) Genotypes to Planting Geometry in<br />

Rainfed Conditions<br />

R. A. Nandagavi 1 *, S. B. Patil 1 , V. S. Surakod 1 , M. S. Shirahatti 1 , M. A. Gaddanakeri 1 ,<br />

H. S. Patil 1 and G. Ravindra Chary 2<br />

1 AICRPDA, RARS, Vijayapura-586101 (UAS, Dharwad), Karnataka, India<br />

2 AICRPDA, ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad 500059, Telangana, India<br />

* nandagavira@uasd.in<br />

Cluster bean (Cyamopsis tetragonoloba (L.) is popularly known as guar, chavli kayi, guari,<br />

khutti etc in local languages <strong>of</strong> southern India. Dry regions <strong>of</strong> West Africa as well as India are<br />

considered as centres <strong>of</strong> origin <strong>of</strong> cluster bean though diverse opinion on exact origin <strong>of</strong> cluster<br />

bean is still prevails. It is characterized as a short-day erect or bushy annual plant (Purseglove,<br />

1981). It is a drought tolerant, warm season legume crop with deep and well-developed root<br />

system, cultivated mainly as rainfed crop in arid and semi-arid regions during rainy (kharif)<br />

season for vegetable, galactomannan gum, forage and green manure. Cluster bean is mainly<br />

cultivated for food, feed and fodder (Reddy et al., 2017). North Eastern part <strong>of</strong> Karnataka<br />

experiences frequent and intermittent droughts coupled with high temperature. The farmers are<br />

following the traditional cropping system <strong>of</strong> Rabi sorghum-sunflower production system. The<br />

market price <strong>of</strong> Rabi sorghum is very low and that <strong>of</strong> sunflower is very much fluctuating and<br />

<strong>of</strong>ten gets infected with powdery mildew. The variation in market price results in loss to the<br />

farmers and even they are unable to meet out the cost <strong>of</strong> cultivation. Rabi sorghum is the main<br />

food crop <strong>of</strong> the Northern Karnataka. Hence farmers are growing rabi sorghum for food<br />

requirement and fodder to their livestock. Apart from growing Rabi sorghum, there is a scope<br />

for introduction <strong>of</strong> cluster bean (gum type) so that the farmers can get an additional income<br />

apart from food grains. Keeping the above in mind the present investigation was taken up to<br />

evaluate and identify the suitable genotype and to standardize the suitable planting geometry.<br />

Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance<br />

410 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Methodology<br />

This study was carried out to assess the feasibility <strong>of</strong> introduction <strong>of</strong> cluster bean under dryland<br />

conditions during kharif seasons for three years (2016 to 2018) at Regional Agricultural<br />

Research Station (RARS), Vijayapura (Karnataka). The experiment was laid out in split plot<br />

design with six spacings in main plot viz., S 1: 30×10cm, S 2: 45×10cm, S 3: 45×15cm,<br />

S4:45×20cm, S5: 60×10cm and S6: 60×20cm and four genotypes <strong>of</strong> cluster bean viz., V1: RGC<br />

938, V 2: RGC 1033, V 3: RGC 1038 and V 4: RGC 1066 in subplots. Recommended fertilizer<br />

dose and cultural practices including need-based plant protection measures were followed to<br />

raise a good crop. Observations from five randomly selected plants <strong>of</strong> each genotype in each<br />

replication were recorded. The mean <strong>of</strong> three years values was used for statistical analysis and<br />

they are presented.<br />

Results<br />

The plant height, number <strong>of</strong> pods per plant, grain yield (kg/ha), benefit cost ratio (B:C ratio)<br />

and rain water use efficiency (RWUE) were estimated using the pooled data <strong>of</strong> three years.<br />

Among the crop geometry tried, cluster bean sown at 30 cm×10 cm gave significantly higher<br />

grain yield <strong>of</strong> 408 kg per ha as compared to 45 cm×15 cm (361 kg/ha), 45cm×20cm (293<br />

kg/ha), 60cm×10cm (275 kg/ha) and 60cm×20cm (229 kg/ha). But it was on par with<br />

45cm×10cm (401 kg/ha). The B:C ratio and RWUE was also significantly higher in above said<br />

treatment. Whereas, pods per plant were significantly higher in less dense treatment. Among<br />

four cluster bean genotypes, RC 1033 and RC 938 recorded significantly higher grain yield<br />

(345 and 341 kg/ha, respectively) than other genotypes. The cost benefit ratio and rain water<br />

use efficiency was also significantly higher in these genotypes. The genotypes RGC 938 and<br />

RGC 1033 was significantly taller and smaller, respectively compared to other<br />

genotypes. Number <strong>of</strong> pods per plant were significantly less in genotype RGC 1066.<br />

Influence <strong>of</strong> spacing and genotypes on growth, yield, economics and RWUE <strong>of</strong> cluster<br />

bean<br />

Plant<br />

Seed yield<br />

RWUE<br />

Treatment<br />

Pods/plant<br />

B:C ratio<br />

height<br />

(kg/ha)<br />

(kg/ha-mm)<br />

Spacing (S)<br />

S1: 30X10cm 23.03 9.8 408 8.09 1.72<br />

S2: 45X10cm 23.78 9.7 401 7.95 1.69<br />

S3: 45X15cm 24.08 10.5 361 7.16 1.41<br />

S4: 45X20cm 22.54 10.4 293 5.81 1.25<br />

S5: 60X10cm 22.52 9.5 275 5.46 1.13<br />

S6: 60X20cm 21.85 11.3 229 4.55 0.88<br />

S.Em ± 0.21 0.2 8 0.15 0.04<br />

CD(p=0.05) 0.64 0.5 23 0.47 0.12<br />

411 | Page Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Genotypes (V)<br />

V1: RGC 938 24.01 10.3 341 6.76 1.41<br />

V2: RGC 1033 21.96 10.7 345 6.85 1.41<br />

V3: RGC 1038 23.20 10.7 327 6.48 1.32<br />

V4: RGC 1066 22.71 9.1 298 5.91 1.24<br />

S.Em ± 0.23 0.1 3 0.07 0.02<br />

CD(p=0.05) 0.67 0.4 10 0.20 0.05<br />

Interactions (S×V) * * * * *<br />

Among the interactions, the genotypes RC 1033, RC 938 and RGC 1038 performed well<br />

under 45×10cm and 30×10cm geometry and produced significantly higher seed yield<br />

compared to other combinations. Similar trend was observed with respect to economics<br />

and RWUE. The genotype RC 1033 and RGC-938 showed superiority over the rest due to<br />

production <strong>of</strong> more pods per plant by utilisation <strong>of</strong> rain water more efficiently, which leads to<br />

effective translocation and distribution <strong>of</strong> photosynthates from source to sink in turn more pod<br />

yield per plant. Similar kind <strong>of</strong> observations made by Satpal et al. (2020) and Gangadhara<br />

(2013) in case <strong>of</strong> cluster bean.<br />

Interaction effect <strong>of</strong> spacing and genotypes on yield <strong>of</strong> cluster bean<br />

Spacing/Genotypes<br />

V1: RGC<br />

938<br />

V2: RGC<br />

1033<br />

V3: RGC<br />

1038<br />

V4: RGC<br />

1066<br />

S1: 30×10cm 431 427 423 354 408<br />

S2: 45×10cm 427 459 429 287 401<br />

S3: 45×15cm 381 392 344 326 361<br />

S4: 45×20cm 266 302 290 313 293<br />

S5: 60×10cm 287 294 260 260 275<br />

S6: 60×20cm 253 201 215 248 229<br />

Mean 341 345 327 298<br />

For comparing S. Em± CD (0.05)<br />

Spacing 8 23<br />

Genotypes 3 10<br />

Spacing at same or different<br />

Genotypes 10 32<br />

Conclusion<br />

The study concluded that the crop geometry <strong>of</strong> 30 × 10 cm and 45 × 10 cm is ideal for cluster<br />

bean genotypes RC 1033 and RGC-938 for getting higher yield and economic returns in<br />

northern dry zone <strong>of</strong> Karnataka.<br />

Mea<br />

n<br />

Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance<br />

412 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

References<br />

Gangadhara, T. C. 2013. Evaluation <strong>of</strong> elite cluster bean [Cyamopsis tetragonoloba (L.) taub.]<br />

genotypes for vegetable and gum purpose in the northern dry zone <strong>of</strong> Karnataka. M. Sc.<br />

(Hort) Thesis, University <strong>of</strong> Horiculture Sciences, Bagalkot (India).<br />

Purseglove, J. W. 1981. Leguminosae. Tropical Crops: Dicotyledons. Longman Group Ltd,<br />

Essex, U. K. Pp- 250-254.<br />

Reddy Rajashekar Dodla, Saidaiah, P., Reddy Ravinder, K., and Pandravada, S. R. 2017. Mean<br />

performance <strong>of</strong> Cluster Bean Genotypes for Yield, Yield Parameters and Quality Traits.<br />

Int. j. curr. microbiol. appl. sci. 6(9): 3685-3693.<br />

Satpal, Panchta R., Arya, S., Singh, D. P., Suresh Kumar, and Neelam. 2020. Performance <strong>of</strong><br />

cluster bean genotypes as influenced by crop geometry and fertilizer levels. Forage Res.<br />

45 (4): 314-317.<br />

T3-37P-1245<br />

Screening Maize Inbred Lines Developed from Local Germplasm for<br />

Excess Moisture Tolerance<br />

E. Lamalakshmi Devi 1* , Krishnappa Rangappa 2 , Ayam Gangarani 3 , Ch. Chinglen<br />

Meetei 1 , Yankey Bhutia 1 , Harendra Verma 4 , B. U. Choudhury 2 and R. Laha 1<br />

1 ICAR-RC- NEH Region, Sikkim Centre, Tadong, Sikkim, India;<br />

2 ICAR RC NEHR, Umiam, Meghalaya, India;<br />

3 ICAR-RC- NEH Region, Lembucherra, Tripura, India;<br />

4 ICAR-RC- NEH Region, Medzhiphema, Nagaland, India<br />

* elangbamlama@gmail.com<br />

North- Eastern regions <strong>of</strong> India are the biodiversity hub for many crops but these regions are<br />

<strong>of</strong>ten exposed to adverse climatic conditions like flood, drought, cold, soil acidity, etc. During<br />

the monsoon season, farmers <strong>of</strong>ten faced flooding condition/ soil saturation due to heavy<br />

rainfall and during the rabi season, drought/ water scarcity is the main challenge. The<br />

vegetative stage is considered one <strong>of</strong> the most critical periods affected under waterlogged<br />

conditions. In maize, Root System Architecture (RSA) is a key determinant <strong>of</strong> nutrient and<br />

water uptake efficiency (Liu et al. 2017) and thus, root traits are emerging as effective<br />

parameters that can be targeted for screening genotypes tolerant to waterlogged condition in<br />

maize. It is promising to manipulate RSA towards distribution <strong>of</strong> roots to optimize water and<br />

nutrient uptake under stressful condition. Keeping in view the existence <strong>of</strong> different local<br />

landraces <strong>of</strong> maize adapted in highly rainfall areas <strong>of</strong> the region, the present study was<br />

undertaken to phenotype and screen the diverse landraces <strong>of</strong> maize collected from different<br />

413 | Page Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

parts <strong>of</strong> North-Eastern region <strong>of</strong> India based on root architecture for their tolerance to<br />

waterlogged condition at vegetative stage.<br />

Methodology<br />

A total <strong>of</strong> 37 inbred lines (32 from ICAR, Sikkim Centre and 5 from ICAR-IIMR, Ludhiana)<br />

were used for the present study. The evaluation <strong>of</strong> landraces for waterlogging tolerance at V 5-<br />

6 stage was undertaken under 2 sets <strong>of</strong> experiments viz., field and microcosm in 2 replications<br />

at Research farm <strong>of</strong> ICAR-RC-NEH Region, Sikkim Centre during 2022. For screening,<br />

artificial flooding was provided at V 5-6 stage to a depth <strong>of</strong> 20cm above the soil surface<br />

continuously for 15 days and data are recorded based on maize Shovelomics. The “Response<br />

Coefficient” (RC) as phenotypic plasticity index (Poorter and Nagel 2000, Abenavoli et al.<br />

2016) and Waterlogging Tolerance Index (WTC) (Liu et al. 2010) were calculated.<br />

Results<br />

Root scanner images <strong>of</strong> the roots <strong>of</strong> inbred lines showed sharp differences between the control<br />

and waterlogged conditions. Based on visual scoring <strong>of</strong> root architecture using Shovelomics,<br />

score ranged from 1 to 9 for the traits brace roots angle (BA), brace roots branching density<br />

(BB), crown roots number (CN), crown root s angle (CA) and crown roots branching (CB).<br />

Some <strong>of</strong> the promising lines identified based on WTC and RC values from the 1 st year trail<br />

were UMI-1810, IML-418-1, RCS-31(Mani-31-2-2), RCS-29 (Mizo-29-4-1), RCS-4 (Mani-4-<br />

1-1) and RCS-21(Mizo-21(B)-2-3).<br />

Root scanner images <strong>of</strong> roots <strong>of</strong> maize inbred lines under waterlogged and control conditions<br />

Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance<br />

414 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Images <strong>of</strong> brace roots angle (BA), brace roots branching density (BB), crown roots number (CN),<br />

crown root s angle (CA) and crown roots branching (CB) displayed were scored with 1, 3, 5, 7 and 9<br />

Conclusion<br />

The maize inbred lines used in the present study were developed from the genetic resources <strong>of</strong><br />

NEH regions. Diverse maize landraces showing distinct and unique traits with high ability to<br />

face extreme weather conditions are reported from this region and these genotypes are being<br />

utilized for developing inbred lines. These lines needs to be screened for various abiotic stresses<br />

including excess moisture stress for developing hybrids tolerant to excess moisture conditions.<br />

References<br />

Abenavoli, M. R., Leone, M., Sunseri, F., Bacchi, M. and Sorgona, A. 2016. Root phenotyping<br />

for drought tolerance in bean landraces from Calabria (Italy). J Agron Crop Sci. 202(1):<br />

1–12.<br />

Liu, Y.Z., Bin, T., Zheng, Y. L., Xu, S. Z. and Qiu, F. Z. 2010. Screening methods for<br />

waterlogging tolerance at maize (Zea mays L.) seedling stage. Agricultural Sciences<br />

in China. 9(3): 362-369.<br />

Liu, Z., Gao, K., Shan, S., Gu, R., Wang, Z., Craft, E. J., Mi, G., Yuan, L. and Chen, F. 2017.<br />

Comparative Analysis <strong>of</strong> Root Traits and the Associated QTLs for Maize Seedlings<br />

Grown in Paper Roll, Hydroponics and Vermiculite Culture System. Front. Plant Sci.<br />

8:436. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.00436<br />

Poorter, H. and Nagel, O. 2000. The role <strong>of</strong> biomass allocation in the growth response <strong>of</strong> plants<br />

to different levels <strong>of</strong> light, CO2, nutrients and water. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 27: 595–<br />

607.<br />

415 | Page Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance<br />

T3-38P-1241<br />

Study on Inter-Relation <strong>of</strong> Yield and The Associated Traits in Maize<br />

Hybrids Under Rainfed Conditions<br />

K.R.V. Sathya Sheela 1* , S. Lakshmi Narayanan 2 , R. Radhajeyalakshmi 1 , T. Selvakumar 1<br />

and N. Satheesh Kumar 1<br />

1 Maize Research Station, TNAU, Vagarai 624 613, Tamil Nadu, India<br />

2 AC&RI, Madurai, TNAU, Coimbatore 641003, Tamil Nadu, India<br />

*sathyakrv@yahoo.co.in<br />

Maize (Zea mays L.), known as ‘queen <strong>of</strong> cereals’ is the third important food crop after rice<br />

and wheat. In addition to staple food for human being and quality feed for animals, maize<br />

serves as a basic raw material as an ingredient to thousands <strong>of</strong> industrial products that includes<br />

starch, oil, protein, alcoholic beverages, food sweeteners, pharmaceutical, cosmetic, film,<br />

textile, gum, package and paper industries etc. It is grown under wider agro-climatic<br />

conditions. Selection <strong>of</strong> promising genotypes and planning management practices to improve<br />

yield is a challenging issue under rainfed conditions. Spatio-temporal variations in rainfall and<br />

temperature affects maize production (Premalatha and Kalamani, 2010). Water limitation has<br />

adverse effect on yield and the development <strong>of</strong> hybrids with reasonable level <strong>of</strong> drought<br />

tolerance is essential for sustainable maize production under water limited conditions.<br />

Reduction in grain yield and yield components <strong>of</strong> maize hybrids under stress conditions is <strong>of</strong>ten<br />

correlated with changes <strong>of</strong> some phenotypic expressions. This study aimed to assess the<br />

responses <strong>of</strong> grain yield and important phenotypic characteristics <strong>of</strong> maize hybrids under water<br />

limited conditions.<br />

Methodology<br />

The experimental study was conducted at Maize Research Station, Vagarai during October -<br />

January 2021. In this study, 19 hybrids from newly developed crosses along with two checks<br />

were evaluated in two replications in Randomized Block Design under rainfed conditions. The<br />

biometrical traits viz., plant height, ear height, days to to 50% tasseling, days to 50% silking,<br />

anthesis silking interval, cob length, no <strong>of</strong> rows per cob, hundred seed weight, shelling<br />

percentage and grain yield were recorded. Correlation among the traits was studied using<br />

TNAU Stat statistical package.<br />

Results<br />

Grain yield, as a complex variable, can reflect the interaction <strong>of</strong> the environment and<br />

management with the growth and development processes that occur throughout the crop’s<br />

maturation cycle (Adnan et al., 2020 and Premalatha et al., 2010) and in addition, yield<br />

component traits adjust their expressions to determine grain yield under different<br />

416 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

environmental and agronomic conditions. Genotypic correlations among the yield and the<br />

biometrical traits were studied.<br />

Trait<br />

s<br />

EH<br />

DAT<br />

DAS<br />

ASI<br />

CL<br />

NRC<br />

HSW<br />

SP<br />

GY<br />

Correlation <strong>of</strong> yield and the associated traits under rainfed conditions<br />

PH EH DAT DAS ASI CL NRC HSW SP<br />

0.7952<br />

**<br />

-<br />

0.8227<br />

**<br />

-<br />

0.9291<br />

**<br />

-<br />

0.7016<br />

**<br />

0.8998<br />

**<br />

0.8576<br />

**<br />

0.8009<br />

**<br />

0.8244<br />

**<br />

0.8415<br />

**<br />

-<br />

0.8159<br />

**<br />

-<br />

0.9511<br />

**<br />

-<br />

0.7507<br />

**<br />

0.7585<br />

**<br />

0.6496<br />

**<br />

0.7697<br />

**<br />

0.4365<br />

*<br />

0.5137<br />

**<br />

1<br />

0.862*<br />

*<br />

0.3603<br />

*<br />

-<br />

0.7914<br />

**<br />

1<br />

-0.3256<br />

0.7834<br />

**<br />

-<br />

0.783*<br />

*<br />

-<br />

0.4877<br />

*<br />

1<br />

0.2077 -0.1836<br />

-0.3278<br />

-<br />

0.497*<br />

*<br />

-<br />

0.508*<br />

*<br />

-<br />

0.804*<br />

*<br />

-<br />

0.4719<br />

*<br />

-<br />

0.4984<br />

**<br />

-<br />

0.592*<br />

*<br />

-<br />

0.5362<br />

**<br />

417 | Page Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance<br />

1<br />

-0.87**<br />

0.9999<br />

**<br />

0.9248<br />

**<br />

0.8655<br />

**<br />

0.7958<br />

**<br />

1<br />

0.5051<br />

**<br />

0.8108<br />

**<br />

0.9889<br />

**<br />

1<br />

0.9999<br />

**<br />

0.8762<br />

**<br />

1<br />

0.9999<br />

**<br />

* Significance at 1 % level; ** Significance at 1 % level; Plant Height (PH); Ear height (EH); Days to 50%<br />

tasselling (DAT); Days to 50% silking (DAS); Anthesis Silking Interval (ASI); Cob length (CL); No <strong>of</strong> rows per<br />

cob (NRC); Hundred seed weight (HSW); Shelling % (SP); Grain Yield (GY).<br />

The range <strong>of</strong> the grain yield varied from 5167 kg/ha to 7450 kg/ha. The hybrid VAH 21007<br />

recorded highest yield <strong>of</strong> 7450 kg/ha under rainfed conditions. Plant height, ear height, cob<br />

length, number <strong>of</strong> rows per cob, hundred seed weight and shelling percentage exhibited positive<br />

association with yield at 1% significance level. Days to 50% tasselling and days to 50% silking<br />

showed negative association with yield at 1% significance level. Cob length had positive<br />

association with number <strong>of</strong> rows per cob, hundred seed weight and shelling percentage. Maize<br />

is a cross pollinated crop and the prolonging <strong>of</strong> Anthesis to silking interval will lead to poor<br />

seed set and it is proved by the negative association <strong>of</strong> ASI with yield. Water stress during<br />

1


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

flowering will lead to delay in silking which will ultimately increase the anthesis to silking<br />

interval and poor seed set (Bharathi et al., 2021). Hence selection <strong>of</strong> genotypes with shorter<br />

ASI, smaller tassels and stay green traits will assist in breeding for water stress conditions.<br />

Water stress during anthesis and silking reduces yield.<br />

Conclusion<br />

The knowledge on the association <strong>of</strong> yield and its components is <strong>of</strong> the great importance in<br />

breeding. Hence low ASI and the cob characters viz., cob length, number <strong>of</strong> rows per cob,<br />

number <strong>of</strong> kernels per row, shelling percentage can be given more importance in selection<br />

criteria under rainfed conditions as they are contributing to yield.<br />

References<br />

Adnan, A. A., Diels, J., Jibrin, J. M., Kamara, A. Y., Shaibu, A. S., Craufurd, P., and Menkir,<br />

A. 2020. CERES-Maize model for simulating genotype – by- environment interaction<br />

<strong>of</strong> maize and its stability in the dry and wet savannas <strong>of</strong> Nigeria. Field Crops Res. 253,<br />

107826.<br />

Bharathi, P., Ravikesavan, R., Yuvaraja, A., Iyanar, K. and Manikanda Boopathi, N. 2021.<br />

Genetic variability and correlation in maize inbred lines under irrigated and moisture<br />

stress condition. Electron. J. Plant Breed. 12(3): 928-933<br />

Premalatha, M., and Kalamani, A. 2010. Correlation studies in maize (Zea maysL.) Int. J. Plant<br />

Sci. 5(1) :376-380.<br />

T3-39P-1088<br />

Transpiration Efficiency in Hybrid and Open Pollinated Variety <strong>of</strong> Pearl<br />

Millet<br />

N.M. Vanaja, B. Sarkar, S. K. Yadav, P. Sathish, Amol Patil,<br />

K. Salini, Arun K. Shanker and V.K. Singh<br />

Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, Hyderabad 500059, Telangana, India<br />

Worldwide, agriculture consumes over 70% <strong>of</strong> fresh water resources used annually (Bacon,<br />

2004). The rapid decline in fresh water resources, coupled with the demand for increased food<br />

production to meet the population growth, poses a great challenge to agriculture. To maintain<br />

or further increase agriculture output depends in part on the efficient management <strong>of</strong> water to<br />

maximize water productivity, the concept <strong>of</strong> assessing agricultural output based on water<br />

consumed rather than land area. Improvement in transpiration efficiency (TE), the inherent<br />

water use efficiency, defined as biomass produced per unit water transpired through plants,<br />

may be another viable approach to increase water productivity. Having higher TE could<br />

Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance<br />

418 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

contribute to a lower rate <strong>of</strong> soil moisture depletion. In general, plants with the C4<br />

photosynthesis pathway are more efficient in water use than plants with the C 3 photosynthesis<br />

pathway (Bacon, 2004). Differences in TE among species are well known. However, variation<br />

in TE within a species has been reported in maize (Jyothi et al., 2020) and blakgram (Jyothi et<br />

al., 2017). As a C 4 crop, pearl millet possesses high TE and is well adapted to semi-arid<br />

environments. Hybrid (ICMH-356) and open pollinated variety (OPV, ICMV-221) were<br />

evaluated to understand the variations in water use and transpiration efficiency from sowing to<br />

grain harvest (during Kharif in rainout shelter facility). The experiment was a completely<br />

randomized block design with five replications. Growth observations and water balance in pots<br />

quantified components <strong>of</strong> whole-plant TE.<br />

Methodology<br />

Transpiration efficiency was determined by gravimetric method with modifications. Whole<br />

plant level TE was determined gravimetrically in 15 litres plastic pots filled with a mixture <strong>of</strong><br />

red soil and farm yard manure. Recommended dose <strong>of</strong> fertilizer was used. Two seeds were<br />

planted per pot and thinned to one plant at 7 days after emergence. The pots were then covered<br />

from both ends with poly bags. A slit was cut in the top bag to permit seedling growth. The slit<br />

was further sealed with a piece <strong>of</strong> clear adhesive tape. The poly bags were tightly fixed onto<br />

the pots with an elastic band. The initial weight recorded. The pots were weighed every 3 days<br />

(from 7 days after covering with poly bags) and measured quantity <strong>of</strong> water was supplemented<br />

through a funnel placed into the poly bag and again sealed with tape after watering. When the<br />

plants reached maturity, they were harvested at soil level and final pot weight was recorded.<br />

Individually plants were partitioned into leaves, stems and cobs and the dry weight was<br />

recorded. Total water transpired was calculated by subtracting the final pot weight from the<br />

initial weight and then adding the amount <strong>of</strong> water that has been applied at regular intervals.<br />

TE biomass and TE seed was calculated by dividing the above ground dry biomass and seed yield<br />

by the amount <strong>of</strong> water transpired.<br />

Results<br />

The water transpired was 19.02 l/p and 20.84 l/p for OPV (ICMV-221) and Hybrid (ICMH-<br />

356) for the total growth period. The total biomass was 67.3 g/p and 107.9 g/p and seed yield<br />

was 30.81 and 43.6 g/pl for OPV and hybrid respectively. In OPV, TE biomass and TE seed yield<br />

was 3.54 (g biomass/1 water) and 1.61 (g seed/ l water) and increased to 5.17 and 2.09<br />

respectively in hybrid. TEbiomass and TEseed (biomass/seed produced per unit <strong>of</strong> water transpired)<br />

in hybrid improved by 46.0% and 29.8% respectively. High TE in hybrid was due to enhanced<br />

biomass production (60.3%) and seed yield (41.5%) with extra water use (9.6%) as compared<br />

to OPV (ICMV-221).<br />

419 | Page Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Total biomass, seed yield, water transpired and TE in hybrid and OPV <strong>of</strong> pearl millet.<br />

Parameters ICMV-221(OPV) ICMH-356 (Hybrid)<br />

Total biomass (g/plant 67.3 107.9 (60.3%)<br />

Seed yield (g/plant) 30.81 43.6 (41.5%)<br />

Water transpired (L/Plant) 19.02 20.84 (9.6%<br />

TE biomass (g biomass/ L water) 3.54 5.17 (46.0%)<br />

TE seed yield (g seed/ L water) 1.61 2.09 (29.8%)<br />

TR biomass (L water/ kg seed) 289.7 194.6 (-32.8%)<br />

TR seed yield (L water/ kg seed) 639 479.4 (-25.0%<br />

Values in parenthesis are % increase or decrease over OPV<br />

120<br />

Total biomass<br />

22<br />

Water transpired (L/plant)<br />

6<br />

Transpiration effficiency<br />

100<br />

20<br />

5<br />

Biomass (g/plant)<br />

80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

Water transpired (L/Plant)<br />

18<br />

16<br />

14<br />

12<br />

TE (g dry wt. /L water)<br />

4<br />

3<br />

2<br />

1<br />

0<br />

ICMV-221<br />

ICMH-356<br />

10<br />

ICMV-221<br />

ICMH-356<br />

0<br />

ICMV-221<br />

ICMH-356<br />

Seed wt Husk Leaf stem<br />

Shoot TE<br />

Seed TE<br />

Total biomass, seed yield and transpiration efficiency in pearl millet hybrid (ICMH-356) and OPV<br />

(ICMV-221)<br />

Conclusion<br />

Transpiration ratio (TR) which is the ratio <strong>of</strong> amount <strong>of</strong> water transpired by a plant during its<br />

growing season to the weight <strong>of</strong> seed produced, decreased from 639 L H 2O/kg seed in OPV to<br />

479.4 L H2O/kg seed in hybrid. Results clearly show that 25% less water was transpired to produce<br />

a kilogram seed suggesting that less water will be required for hybrid compared to open pollinated<br />

variety. Hybrids have high TE compared to open pollinated varieties.<br />

References<br />

Bacon, M.A., 2004. Water Use Efficiency in Plant Biology. Blackwell Publishing Ltd., Boca<br />

Raton, FL.<br />

Jyothi Lakshmi, N., Vanaja, M., Yadav, S. K., Amol Patil, Ram Prasad, Ch., Sathish, P., Salini,<br />

K., Arun K.Shanker and Maheswari, M. 2020. Assessing genetic diversity <strong>of</strong> maize<br />

genotypes for transpiration efficiency. Electron. J. Plant Breed. Vol 11(3):822-830.<br />

Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance<br />

420 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Jyothi Lakshmi, N., Vanaja, M., Yadav, S. K., Amol Patil, Ram Prasad, Ch., Sathish, P., Vijay<br />

Kumar, Vagheera, Salini K., and Maheswari, M. 2017. Genetic variability for grain<br />

yield and water use efficiency in blackgram genotypes. J. Appl. Nat. Sci. 9 (3): 1592-<br />

97.<br />

T3-40P-1086<br />

Variability in Growth and Yield Responses <strong>of</strong> Four Blackgram Genotypes<br />

at Elevated CO2<br />

M.Vanaja*, P. Sathish, B. Sarkar, N. Jyothi Lakshmi, A. Sushma, Ch. Mohan,<br />

S.K. Yadav, M. Prabhakar and V.K. Singh<br />

Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, Hyderabad 500059, Telangana, India<br />

* m.vanaja@icar.gov.in; vanajamaddi@gmail.com<br />

The earth atmospheric CO2 concentration continuously rising, and the current levels have<br />

reached 411 ppm (https://climate.nasa.gov/vital-signs/carbon-dioxi de/). The impact <strong>of</strong><br />

elevated CO2 (eCO2) was positive with C3 crops especially legumes for both biomass and seed<br />

yield as compared to C 4 cereal crops. The eCO 2 brings about an increase in photosynthetic<br />

rates, growth, development, and yield <strong>of</strong> a wide range <strong>of</strong> cultivated crops (Pan et al., 2018).<br />

The productivity <strong>of</strong> most agricultural crops increases under eCO2 in the range <strong>of</strong> 15 to 41% for<br />

C3 crops and 5 to 10% for C4 crops (Kimball, 2011). For nutritional security, especially for<br />

the vegetarian population inclusion <strong>of</strong> pulses is essential. Blackgram (Vigna mungo L.) also<br />

called as urad is the ‘King <strong>of</strong> pulses’ and is considered as originated in India. It belongs to the<br />

Leguminosae family and in India, it is grown in 3.5 million hectares with a production <strong>of</strong><br />

around 2.0 million tonnes. The present study was aimed at the quantification <strong>of</strong> the biomass<br />

and yield responses <strong>of</strong> this important pulse crop to eCO 2 and variability in genotypes with high<br />

yield potential.<br />

Methodology<br />

To assess the impact <strong>of</strong> eCO 2 on growth and yield <strong>of</strong> four blackgram (Vigna mungo L.)<br />

genotypes (IPU-06-02, PLU-826, PSRJ-95016 and IPU- 94-1), a field experiment was<br />

conducted in Open Top Chamber (OTC) facility during Kharif 2022. The OTC facility consists<br />

6 chambers <strong>of</strong> 3m × 3m × 3m and two <strong>of</strong> them were maintained at ambient CO2 (aCO 2) and<br />

four at eCO2 <strong>of</strong> 550ppm (Vanaja et al., 2016). The observations were recorded on phenology<br />

<strong>of</strong> flowering, physiological, biomass and yield parameters.<br />

Results<br />

The phenology <strong>of</strong> 50% flowering was early under eCO2 condition by 2.0 (PLU-826) to 3.7<br />

days (PSRJ-95016) as compared with ambient condition. The eCO 2 condition improved Net<br />

421 | Page Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Assimilation, Anet (17%) and water use efficiency, WUE (19%) and reduced the stomatal<br />

conductance, gs (24%), and transpiration, Tr (3%) <strong>of</strong> blackgram genotypes than at aCO 2.<br />

Among the four selected genotypes, IPU-06-02 registered highest response to eCO 2 for all<br />

these physiological parameters. The improvement <strong>of</strong> total biomass with eCO2 ranged from 22%<br />

(IPU- 94-1) to 30% (IPU-06-02) and seed yield from 27% (PSRJ-95016) to 45% (IPU- 94-1).<br />

The improved seed yield was mainly contributed by increased per plant pod number (24%),<br />

number <strong>of</strong> seeds (19%) and 100 seed weight (12%) indicating that the enhanced CO 2<br />

concentration with improved assimilative capacity increasing pod set as well as seed filling.<br />

The presence <strong>of</strong> eCO2 improved both vegetative and reproductive biomass and impacted the<br />

proportion <strong>of</strong> enhanced biomass towards seed. It was observed that the overall impact <strong>of</strong> eCO 2<br />

on this pulse crop was higher for reproductive biomass (32%) than vegetative biomass (22%)<br />

and this was reflected in improved harvest index, HI (3.6%). Similarly, Ziska and Blowsky<br />

(2007) also reported a significant increase in pod number, pod weight, and total seed weight at<br />

elevated CO2 concentration in mung beans.<br />

Improvement <strong>of</strong> physiological parameters in black gram with eCO2.<br />

Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance<br />

422 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Conclusion<br />

Improvement <strong>of</strong> biomass and yield parameters in black gram with eCO2.<br />

The elevated CO 2 <strong>of</strong> 550ppm reduced the days to flowering and improved the physiological<br />

performance, biomass, and seed yield <strong>of</strong> the blackgram crop. However, the selected four<br />

blackgram genotypes showed differential responses for physiological, biomass, and yield<br />

parameters with eCO 2. The highest response to eCO 2 for physiological parameters was with<br />

genotype IPU-06-02, for vegetative biomass was with PLU-826, and seed yield with IPU- 94-<br />

1. The improvement in seed yield was due to the increased number <strong>of</strong> pods, seeds and test<br />

weight revealing that the eCO2 condition provided a beneficial impact through increased pod<br />

set and seed filling <strong>of</strong> this C3 leguminous crop.<br />

References<br />

Kimball, B. A. 2011. Lessons from FACE: CO2 Effects and Interactions with Water,<br />

Nitrogen, and Temperature. In: Hillel, D. and Rosenzweig, C., Eds., Handbook <strong>of</strong><br />

Climate Change and Agroecosystems: Impacts, Adaptation, and Mitigation, Imperial<br />

College Press, London, 87-107.<br />

Pan, C., Ahammed, G. J., Li, X., and Shi, K. 2018. Elevated CO2 improves photosynthesis<br />

under high temperature by attenuating the functional limitations to energy fluxes,<br />

electron transport and redox homeostasis in tomato leaves. Front. Plant Sci. 9: 1739.<br />

https:// doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.01739.<br />

423 | Page Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Vanaja, M., Maheswari, M., Ratnakumar, P. and Ramakrishna, Y.S. 2006. Monitoring and<br />

controlling <strong>of</strong> CO 2 concentrations in open top chambers for better understanding <strong>of</strong> plants<br />

response to elevated CO 2 levels. Indian J. Radio Space 35: 193-197.<br />

Ziska, L.H. and Blowsky, R. 2007. A quantitative and qualitative assessment <strong>of</strong> mung bean<br />

(Vigna mungo L. Wilczek) seed in response to elevated atmospheric carbon dioxide:<br />

potential changes in fatty acid composition. J. Agric. Food Chem.87: 920-23.<br />

T3-41P-1169<br />

Varietal Performance Arid Fruit Crop Pomegranate under Vidarbha<br />

Region <strong>of</strong> Maharashtra State<br />

R. S. Wankhade 1* , Y. D. Charjan 1 , N. H. Ramteke 2 and H. H. Dikey 3<br />

1<br />

Agriculture Research Station, Dr. P.D.K.V.Achalpur Dist. Amravati- 444805<br />

2<br />

Dr. P.D.K.V., Akola- 444104<br />

3<br />

Regional Research Centre, Dr. P.D.K.V., Amravati Dist. Amravati- 444 603<br />

*rswankhade70@gmail.com<br />

Pomegranate (Punicagranatum L.) is an important arid zone fruit cropand has emerged as a<br />

commercially important fruit crop. However, the performance <strong>of</strong> the plant will be excellent if<br />

maintenance is with protective irrigation. In the recent past, pomegranate has attained export<br />

potential and foreign exchange. Fruits are exported to Europe, Middle East, Africa, America<br />

and Asian countries. It is commercially cultivated in Maharashtra, Karnataka, Gujarat,<br />

Rajasthan, Uttar Pradesh, Andra Pradesh, and Tamil Nadu. The major pomegranate growing<br />

area under rainshadow districts <strong>of</strong> Maharashtra regions particularly Solapur, Sangli, Nashik,<br />

Ahmednagar, Pune, Dhule, Aurangabad, Satara, Osmanabad and Latur. In Vidarbha region<br />

pomegranate cultivation is at infant stage. Many varieties are under cultivation in this region<br />

but evaluation and recommendation regarding their suitability for this zone has not been done.<br />

In this regard, present work was carried out to know promising variety which is suitable to<br />

Vidharbha region <strong>of</strong> Maharashtra state.<br />

Methodology<br />

Field experiment was conducted at Agriculture Research Station, Dr. Panjabrao Deshmukh<br />

Krishi Vidyapeeth, Achalpur, (M.S.), India to select best suited variety for commercial<br />

cultivation under Achalpur condition <strong>of</strong> Amravati district <strong>of</strong> Maharashtra state during 2015-<br />

16 to 2017-18. In this experiment three varieties which are planted in September-2015 at<br />

Agriculture Research Station, Dr. Panjabrao Deshmukh Krishi Vidyapeeth, Achalpur, (M.S.),<br />

farm was Ganesh, Bhagwa and Arakta were selected. The design <strong>of</strong> experimental plot was<br />

Randomized Block Design replicated seven times with two plants per replication. For<br />

observation <strong>of</strong> plant height (cm), diameter <strong>of</strong> stem (cm) and number <strong>of</strong> fruits plant -1 were<br />

Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance<br />

424 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

taken by selecting two plants. Five fruits from each variety were selected for taking<br />

observations <strong>of</strong> weight <strong>of</strong> fruit (g).<br />

Results<br />

It is evident from the data presented in Table and Figure that there was significant varietal<br />

differences in respect <strong>of</strong> growth and yield attributes. The data pertaining to tree and yield<br />

characters <strong>of</strong> three pomegranate cultivars is presented in Table. Plant height ranged between<br />

175.11 cm in Ganesh to 222.86 cm in Bhagwa. Significantly highest plant height was recorded<br />

as 222.86 cm in Bhagwa followed by 202.57 cm in Arakta. The minimum plant height was<br />

recorded as 175.11 cm in Ganesh. Significantly maximum diameter <strong>of</strong> stem 3.99 cm observed<br />

in Bhagwa followed by 3.44 cm in Arakta, whereas significantly minimum stem diameter<br />

recorded in Ganesh (3.16cm). Similar type <strong>of</strong> variation in plant height has been reported in<br />

pomegranate (Sharma and Bist, 2005). The slight variations among different studies may be<br />

attributed to the genetic makeup <strong>of</strong> cultivars, agroclimatic conditions, nutritional status <strong>of</strong> soil<br />

and cultural practices.<br />

Yield Characters<br />

Highest number <strong>of</strong> fruits plant -1 , weight <strong>of</strong> fruit and yield were recorded (38.57, 123.43 g and<br />

61.67 q ha -1 ) in cultivar Bhagwa which was statistically higher than rest <strong>of</strong> the cultivar<br />

followed by Arakta (33.43, 118.71 g and 59.36 q ha -1 ) and Ganesh (30.00, 108.86 g and 54.43<br />

q ha -1 ). Similar result reported by<br />

Growth and yield performance <strong>of</strong> different varieties <strong>of</strong> pomegranate (2017-2018)<br />

Sr.<br />

No.<br />

Name <strong>of</strong><br />

cultivar<br />

Plant<br />

height<br />

(cm)<br />

Diameter <strong>of</strong><br />

stem (cm)<br />

No. <strong>of</strong><br />

fruits<br />

plant -1<br />

Fruit<br />

weight (g)<br />

Yield<br />

(q ha -1 )<br />

1 Bhagwa 222.86 3.99 38.57 123.43 61.67<br />

2 Arakta 202.57 3.44 33.43 118.71 59.36<br />

3 Ganesh 175.11 3.16 30.00 108.86 54.43<br />

F test Sig. Sig. Sig. Sig. Sig.<br />

SE m + 2.36 0.10 0.61 0.58 0.29<br />

C.D. 5 % 7.26 0.29 1.88 1.78 0.89<br />

425 | Page Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Conclusion<br />

Growth and yield performance <strong>of</strong> different varieties <strong>of</strong> pomegranate (2017-2018)<br />

The maximum plant height, diameter <strong>of</strong> stem, number <strong>of</strong> fruit per plant, fruit weight and yield<br />

per hectare were noticed significantly in pomegranate variety viz. Bhagwa. Hence, Bhagwa<br />

variety <strong>of</strong> pomegranate found best under Achalpur condition <strong>of</strong> Amravati district <strong>of</strong><br />

Maharashtra state.<br />

References<br />

Rao, K., Dhanumjaya and Subramanyam, K., 2010. Growth and yield performance <strong>of</strong><br />

pomegranate varieties under scarce rainfall zone. Agriculture Science Digest. 30(1)71-<br />

72.<br />

Sharma, K.K. and Dillion, W.S., 2002. Evaluation <strong>of</strong> evergreen varieties <strong>of</strong> under Punjab<br />

conditions. Agriculture Science Digest. 22 (1)42-44.<br />

Sharma, N and Bist, H.S., 2005. Evaluation <strong>of</strong> some pomegranate cultivars under mid hills <strong>of</strong><br />

Himachal Pradesh. Acta Horticulture. 696: 103-105.<br />

Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance<br />

426 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

T3-42P<br />

Assessment <strong>of</strong> Genetic Diversity among the Maize (Zea mays L.) Genotypes<br />

Based on SSR Markers Linked to Drought Tolerance<br />

P. Sathish*, M. Vanaja, Y. Varalaxmi, B. Sarkar, N. Jyothi Lakshmi, S.K. Yadav, Ch.<br />

Mohan, A. Sushma and M. Prabhakar<br />

ICAR - Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, Hyderabad-500 059, India<br />

*p.sathish2@icar.gov.in<br />

Maize (Zea mays L.) is the third most important cereal crop after wheat and rice in terms <strong>of</strong><br />

global grain production. Drought is one <strong>of</strong> the most important abiotic stresses limiting crop<br />

yield by 15, 40%, and 60% at vegetative, pollination and grain filling periods respectively.<br />

Diversity among maize germplasm is important for identifying parental lines for successful<br />

breeding programme and development <strong>of</strong> hybrids with adaptation to a broad range <strong>of</strong><br />

environments. Among the different types <strong>of</strong> molecular markers, simple sequence repeats<br />

(SSRs) are one <strong>of</strong> the most promising molecular markers and quite useful in assessment <strong>of</strong><br />

genetic diversity, marker assisted selection and genetic studies such as construction <strong>of</strong> linkage<br />

maps and QTL mapping. The present study was aimed to identify diverse genotypes <strong>of</strong> maize<br />

for genetic enhancement <strong>of</strong> drought tolerance.<br />

Methodology<br />

Twelve maize genotypes were obtained from different sources viz., ICAR-IIMR, New Delhi;<br />

ICAR-NBPGR, Hyderabad; ICAR-CRIDA; Maize Research Centre, PJTSAU, Hyderabad.<br />

The crop was sown during kharif 2021 at ICAR- CRIDA, Hyderabad, to assess the genetic<br />

diversity among the genotypes. The recommended fertilizer dose and cultural practices along<br />

with plant protection measures were followed to raise the crop. Each genotype genomic DNA<br />

was extracted from young leaves at 3- to 4-week-old plants following CTAB method (Doyle<br />

and Doyle, 1990) with slight modifications. Genomic SSR markers (25) reported having<br />

association with drought tolerance traits belonging to different series viz., bnlg, umc, and phi<br />

were selected. These markers were selected based on their repeat units and bin location to<br />

provide uniform coverage <strong>of</strong> entire maize genome. The SSR amplification <strong>of</strong> gel images and<br />

marker data were processed using Biovision s<strong>of</strong>tware, USA. The molecular weight data were<br />

used to calculate the number <strong>of</strong> alleles, heterozygosity, and polymorphism information content<br />

(PIC) for each <strong>of</strong> the primer pairs using Power Marker 3.25 s<strong>of</strong>tware (Liu and Muse 2005).<br />

The binary data <strong>of</strong> SSR markers was used for cluster analysis and the dendrogram was<br />

generated based on similarity matrices obtained with the unweighted pair-group method using<br />

the arithmetic mean (UPGMA). All the data analysis was carried out using the NTSYS-pc2.0<br />

s<strong>of</strong>tware package (Rohlf, 1998).<br />

427 | Page Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Results<br />

Twelve maize genotypes were characterized using 25 drought related SSR markers, and the<br />

data revealed most <strong>of</strong> SSR markers as polymorphic. These polymorphic SSRs were used to<br />

estimate the genetic variation among the selected maize genotypes. Twenty-five SSR markers<br />

amplified a total <strong>of</strong> 124 alleles and the number <strong>of</strong> alleles ranged from 4 to 7 with a mean <strong>of</strong> 5<br />

alleles per locus. The higher (7) number <strong>of</strong> alleles were amplified by markers bnlg 1179, umc<br />

1542, bnlg 1866 and bnlg 2190 followed by 6 alleles were amplified by markers bnlg 1014,<br />

bnlg 1209 and phi014 (Fig.). The amplified products with 25 SSRs were ranged from 100 to<br />

298 bp. The highest PCR fragment (298 bp) was generated by primer umc 1596 and the lowest<br />

size fragment (100 bp) by bnlg 490. Polymorphism information content (PIC) ranged from 0.70<br />

to with 0.84 a mean <strong>of</strong> 0.75, Heterozygosity (H) ranged from 0.75 to with 0.86 a mean <strong>of</strong> 0.79.<br />

In the present study total <strong>of</strong> 124 alleles generated by using 25 SSR markers and the obtained<br />

PIC values. Based on dendrogram results 12 genotypes were separated in to 4 major clusters<br />

and cluster IV with 4 genotypes. These results clearly indicating that the selected genotypes<br />

possessed high level <strong>of</strong> genetic diversity as they showed high level <strong>of</strong> polymorphism <strong>of</strong> drought<br />

linked SSR markers.<br />

L 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 L<br />

bnlg 1014<br />

L 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 L<br />

bnlg 1179<br />

bnlg 1621<br />

bnlg 1065<br />

bnlg 2190<br />

umc1447<br />

Figure: PCR amplification pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> 12 maize genotypes generated by primers bnlg 1014, bnlg 1179, bnlg 1621,<br />

bnlg 1065, bnlg 2190, umc 1447, L- DNA Ladder (100bp), maize genotypes 1 to12 in the following order <strong>of</strong> M-22,<br />

DTL-4-1, Harsha, M-24, DHM-117, M-59, DTL-3, M-16, DTL-4, Varun, DTL-9 and DTL-11.<br />

Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance<br />

428 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Conclusion<br />

Among the selected 12 maize genotypes there is high genetic diversity was recorded as there<br />

is significant polymorphism <strong>of</strong> drought linked SSR markers was existing. This genetic resource<br />

may be useful in future quantitative trait loci (QTL) mapping for different traits and further to<br />

develop tolerant varieties for various abiotic stress conditions including drought.<br />

References<br />

Doyle, J. J. and Doyle, J. L. 1990. A rapid DNA isolation procedure from small quantity <strong>of</strong> fresh<br />

leaf material. Phytochem. Bull. 119:11-15.<br />

Liu, K. J. and Muse, S. V. 2005. Power Marker: integrated analysis environment for genetic<br />

marker data. Bioinformatics 21, 2128–2129.<br />

Rohlf, F. J. 1998. NTSYS-pc Numerical Taxonomy and Multivariate Analysis System, Version<br />

2.02i. Exeter Publications, New York.<br />

429 | Page Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance


Theme– 4<br />

Sustainable soil management for resilient<br />

rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation<br />

agriculture, organic farming, INM, soilmicroorganisms-plant<br />

interactions


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Theme – 4: Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agroecosystem:<br />

conservation agriculture, organic farming, INM, soilmicroorganisms-plant<br />

interactions<br />

List <strong>of</strong> <strong>Extended</strong> Summaries<br />

Sl.<br />

No<br />

Title First Author ID<br />

1 Long term effect <strong>of</strong> Nutrient management practices in<br />

rainfed maize in Southern Rajasthan under dryland<br />

condition<br />

2 Carbon sequestrations impact on black cotton soil under<br />

Rainfed condition <strong>of</strong> Malwa plateau.<br />

3 Bio-fertilizers mediated integrated nutrient management<br />

for sustaining the Chickpea productivity under rainfed<br />

Vertisols <strong>of</strong> south India<br />

4 Integrated organic farming systems: Sustainable<br />

approach for harnessing food-energy -carbon nexus in<br />

agricultural production systems<br />

5 Impact <strong>of</strong> long- term fertilization and manuring on<br />

aggregate stability and biochemical characterization <strong>of</strong><br />

aggregate associated C in the Alfisols<br />

6 Response <strong>of</strong> Microbial Consortia on productivity <strong>of</strong><br />

Sorghum (Sorghum bicolar L.) and soil quality under<br />

rainfed condition<br />

7 Soil moisture stress alters the abundance <strong>of</strong> maize root<br />

associated bacteria<br />

8 Long term integrated plant nutrient supply and insitu<br />

crop residues management practices on plant nutrient<br />

uptake and soil microbial population assessment in<br />

rainfed cotton under vertisols<br />

9 On-farm Assessment <strong>of</strong> Site Specific Nutrient<br />

Management in Rainfed areas <strong>of</strong> Telangana<br />

10 Integrated Nutrient Management Approach in Soybean<br />

(Glycine max L., Merrill) Grown in Vertisols Under<br />

Rainfed Condition <strong>of</strong> Malwa Plateau, Madhya Pradesh<br />

11 Vertical distribution <strong>of</strong> different pools <strong>of</strong> soil organic<br />

carbon under long term finger millet monocropping on<br />

Alfisols in semi-arid tropical India<br />

12 Conjoint Application <strong>of</strong> Nano-Urea and Conventional<br />

Fertilizers for Sustainable Crop Production<br />

RK Sharma<br />

Bharat Singh<br />

MN Ramesha<br />

Subhash Babu<br />

Suvana Sukumaran<br />

PH Gourkhede<br />

M Manjunath<br />

V Sanjivkumar<br />

Kasthuri Rajamani<br />

Bharat Singh<br />

BG Vasanthi<br />

Pravin Kumar<br />

Upadhyay<br />

T4-01O-1124<br />

T4-02O-1260<br />

T4-03O-1394<br />

T4-03aO-1636<br />

T4-04R-1217<br />

T4-05R-1032<br />

T4-06R-1055<br />

T4-07R-1066<br />

T4-08R-1099<br />

T4-09R-1437<br />

T4-10R-1484<br />

T4-10aR-1624<br />

430 | Page Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming, INM,<br />

soil-microorganisms-plant interactions


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Sl.<br />

No<br />

Title First Author ID<br />

13 Soil Organic Carbon Stock Changes in a Semi-Arid<br />

Alfisol under Heavy Carbon Loading<br />

14 Impact <strong>of</strong> fertilizer deep placement on yield and<br />

nutrient use efficiency <strong>of</strong> direct seeded rice<br />

15 Sowing dates and nutrient management practices in<br />

spring-summer black gram [Vigna mungo (L.) Hepper]<br />

for optimization <strong>of</strong> growth and production<br />

16 Effect <strong>of</strong> N fertilization on grain N content and<br />

productivity <strong>of</strong> rice and maize<br />

17 Integrated approach for zinc enrichment in rainfed<br />

maize<br />

18 Influence <strong>of</strong> Integrated Nutrient Management on Soil<br />

Properties, Crop Yields and Water Use Efficiency in<br />

Rainfed Maize-Wheat Rotation<br />

19 Effect <strong>of</strong> mulching and integrated nutrient management<br />

on growth <strong>of</strong> kharif maize under dryland condition<br />

20 Yield Maximization <strong>of</strong> Indian Mustard (Brassica<br />

juncea) through Integrated Nutrient Management under<br />

Dryland Condition<br />

21 Quality and Leaf Nutrient <strong>of</strong> Pomegranate (Punica<br />

granatum L.) Influenced by Integrated Nutrient<br />

Management<br />

22 Effect <strong>of</strong> Long-Term Fertilization on Yield and<br />

Chemical Properties <strong>of</strong> Soil in Soybean-Safflower<br />

Croping Sequence in dryland condition under Vertisol<br />

23 Effect <strong>of</strong> foliar application <strong>of</strong> DAP on yield, quality and<br />

nutrient uptake <strong>of</strong> chickpea under dryland conditions<br />

24 Effect <strong>of</strong> Sulphur Levels and FYM on Yield, Oil<br />

Content and Nutrient Uptake <strong>of</strong> Safflower under<br />

Dryland Condition<br />

25 Changes in soil fertility status after long term<br />

application <strong>of</strong> integrated nutrient management in direct<br />

seeded rice-field pea cropping system<br />

26 Response <strong>of</strong> Mung bean to higher doses <strong>of</strong> fertilizers<br />

under rainfed conditions<br />

27 Response <strong>of</strong> Soybean Varieties to Integrated Nutrient<br />

Management under Rain-fed Condition in New Alluvial<br />

K Srinivas<br />

Jami Naveen<br />

Purabi Banerjee<br />

Surajit Mondal<br />

P Nandini<br />

Mohammad Amin<br />

Bhat<br />

Sudhanshu Verma<br />

SK Sharma<br />

R Bhagyaresha<br />

R Bhagyaresha<br />

IR Bagwan<br />

Shubhangi Kadam<br />

T Chandrakar<br />

MD Giri<br />

Anusree Paul<br />

T4-11P-1027<br />

T4-12P-1035<br />

T4-13P-1058<br />

T4-14P-1060<br />

T4-15P-1064<br />

T4-16P-1628<br />

T4-17P-1085<br />

T4-18P-1089<br />

T4-19P-1093<br />

T4-20P-1094<br />

T4-21P-1098<br />

T4-22P-1100<br />

T4-23P-1114<br />

T4-24P-1130<br />

T4-25P-1143<br />

Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming,<br />

INM, soil-microorganisms-plant interactions<br />

431 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Sl.<br />

No<br />

Zone <strong>of</strong> West Bengal<br />

Title First Author ID<br />

28 Water-soluble fertilizers for foliar supplementation in<br />

rainfed areas<br />

29 Foliar nutrition: a key to integrated nutrient<br />

management in vegetable cowpea<br />

30 Impact <strong>of</strong> integrated nutrient management on wheat<br />

(Triticum aestivum L.) in Eastern Uttar Pradesh<br />

31 Effect <strong>of</strong> integrated nutrient management on growth,<br />

yield and economics <strong>of</strong> rainfed chickpea (Cicer<br />

arietinum L.)<br />

32 Effect <strong>of</strong> integrated nutrient management on the growth<br />

and yield <strong>of</strong> mustard (Brassica juncea (L.) Czernj.<br />

&Cosson) under guava (Psidium guajavaL.) based agrihorti<br />

system<br />

33 Effect Of Integrated Nutrient Management on System<br />

Yield, Sustainable Yield Index and Soil Properties In<br />

Maize-Based Cropping System<br />

34 Soil microbial dynamics as influenced by crop residue<br />

management practices in legume- cereal sequence<br />

35 Response <strong>of</strong> Sweet Corn (Zea mays L.var. saccharata<br />

sturt) to Integrated Nutrient Management Under<br />

Rainfed Condition<br />

36 Effect <strong>of</strong> sulphur levels and spacings on growth and<br />

yield <strong>of</strong> Linseed (Linum usitatissium L.) under Vertisols<br />

in rainfed situation <strong>of</strong> Marathwada region<br />

37 Growth and Yield <strong>of</strong> soybean (Glycine max (L.)<br />

Merrill) as influenced by foliar application <strong>of</strong> growth<br />

regulators, seaweed extract and potassium nitrate.<br />

38 Nutrient management for sustaining productivity <strong>of</strong><br />

sunflower-based cropping systems in vertisols <strong>of</strong> ap.<br />

39 Effect <strong>of</strong> integrated nutrient management on growth and<br />

yield <strong>of</strong> kharif Groundnut (Arachis hypogea L.)<br />

40 Soil test crop response approach for chickpea crop in<br />

Vertisol<br />

41 Studies on growth, yield and quality <strong>of</strong> sesame as<br />

influenced by chemical fertilizers and liquid<br />

bi<strong>of</strong>ertilizers<br />

SS Balloli<br />

RK Krishnasree<br />

Ambuj Kumar Singh<br />

SM Kurmvanshi<br />

Miryala Sushma<br />

Bikram Borkotoki<br />

Ammaji Pydi<br />

PN Karanjikar<br />

VB Awasarmal<br />

JD Kalambe<br />

K Prabhakar<br />

AK Ghotmukale<br />

YS Satish Kumar<br />

SG Mane<br />

T4-26P-1162<br />

T4-27P-1183<br />

T4-28P-1190<br />

T4-29P-1228<br />

T4-30P-1259<br />

T4-31P-1299<br />

T4-32P-1310<br />

T4-33P-1313<br />

T4-34P-1323<br />

T4-35P-1328<br />

T4-36P-1351<br />

T4-37P-1361<br />

T4-38P-1390<br />

T4-39P-1421<br />

432 | Page Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming, INM,<br />

soil-microorganisms-plant interactions


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Sl.<br />

No<br />

Title First Author ID<br />

42 Response <strong>of</strong> little millet to different spacings and<br />

fertilizer levels<br />

43 Effect <strong>of</strong> Polymulching on Dalley Chilli in Eastern<br />

Himalayan Region <strong>of</strong> West Bengal<br />

44 A Study on Resilience Of Soil Health Through Fertigation<br />

And Nutrient Management In Tomato<br />

45 Phenological and quality response <strong>of</strong> gram (Cicer<br />

arietinum L.) to foliage applied fertilizers<br />

46 Assessment <strong>of</strong> bio-fertilizers and phosphorus levels on<br />

productivity and pr<strong>of</strong>itability <strong>of</strong> green gram (Vigna<br />

radiata L.)<br />

47 Effect <strong>of</strong> Long-Term Fertilizer Application on crop<br />

productivity <strong>of</strong> Wheat<br />

48 Studies on effect <strong>of</strong> NPK, Bulb size and Spacing on<br />

Yield <strong>of</strong> Pran (Top Onion) under temperate rainfed<br />

conditions<br />

49 Stress Management in Wheat Crop Through Foliar<br />

Spray <strong>of</strong> TGA Agro-chemical<br />

50 Biochar: An effective soil amendment to reduce<br />

emissions and increase crop productivity<br />

51 Temporal Changes in Soil Properties Under Intensive<br />

Cotton Growing Vertisols<br />

52 Effect <strong>of</strong> different levels <strong>of</strong> nitrogen, phosphorus and potash<br />

on yield, yield attributes and economic <strong>of</strong> Bt. cotton under<br />

rainfed conditions<br />

53 Effect <strong>of</strong> long term INM on SOC stock, yield<br />

sustainability and its relationship with soil quality<br />

attributes under cotton + greengram (1:1) intercropping<br />

system in Vertisols<br />

SJR Syed<br />

PranabBarma<br />

Minnu John<br />

Sharad<br />

ShikandarJadhav<br />

Manoj Kumar<br />

Jyoti Bangre<br />

Tahir Saleem<br />

RS Rathore<br />

Nitin M Kumbhar<br />

SB Girdekar<br />

PD Vekariya<br />

VV Gabhane<br />

T4-40P-1455<br />

T4-41P-1480<br />

T4-42P-1506<br />

T4-43P-1524<br />

T4-44P-1548<br />

T4-45P-1563<br />

T4-46P-1618<br />

T4-47P<br />

T4-48P<br />

T4-49P<br />

T4-50P<br />

T4-51P<br />

Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming,<br />

INM, soil-microorganisms-plant interactions<br />

433 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

T4-01O-1124<br />

Long-Term Effect <strong>of</strong> Nutrient Management Practices in Rainfed Maize in<br />

Southern Rajasthan under Dryland Condition<br />

R. K. Sharma 1* , J. K. Balyan 2 , G. R. Chary 4 , Ramavtar 1 , S. Dadheech 1 and S. K. Sharma 3<br />

1 College <strong>of</strong> Agriculture Bhilwara–311001, Rajasthan<br />

2 Dryland Farming Research Station, Arjia, Bhilwara<br />

3 Directorate <strong>of</strong> Research, Udaipur4ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

*rksdfrs@ yahoo.co.in<br />

Rainfed agriculture is the main stay <strong>of</strong> farmers in Rajasthan. Out <strong>of</strong> 10.23 lakh ha <strong>of</strong> gross<br />

cropped area in Sub-Humid Plain and Southern Hills <strong>of</strong> South Rajasthan, 77% area is rainfed.<br />

The zone is characterized by small and scattered land holdings, erratic distribution <strong>of</strong> rainfall,<br />

inherently poor soil fertility and frequent crop failures due to drought. Integrated nutrient<br />

management envisages the use <strong>of</strong> fertilizers in conjunction with locally available nutrient<br />

sources <strong>of</strong> organic-based manures (FYM, compost, green leaf manure etc.), legume in<br />

cropping system for sustaining soil health and productivity. The soils are low in nitrogen.<br />

Therefore, instead <strong>of</strong> solely depending on costly chemical fertilizer, some low-cost practices<br />

should be adopted to explore the possibility <strong>of</strong> getting the natural sources <strong>of</strong> nitrogen<br />

available to the farmers.<br />

Methodology<br />

Field experiments were conducted in All Indian Coordinated Research Project on Dryland<br />

Agriculture, Dryland Farming Research Station (MPUAT) Arjia, Rajasthan during kharif<br />

2008-2020 under dryland conditions. The experimental site is typically representative <strong>of</strong> the<br />

dryland conditions <strong>of</strong> western India and having Sandy loam soil texture. The experiment was<br />

laid out in a randomized block design with four replications and nine treatments in a set. The<br />

treatments consisted <strong>of</strong> T 1- Control (No fertilizer), T 2-100% RDN & P (50 kg N+30 kg P 2O 5<br />

ha-1) through inorganic fertilizer,T3- 25 kg N through FYM and remaining 25 kg N through<br />

IF +30 kg P 2O 5 ha-1, T 4-25 Kg N through compost and remaining 25 kg N through IF+30 kg<br />

P2O5 ha-1, T5-25 kg N through crop residues (wheat straw) and remaining 25 kg N through<br />

IF+30 kg P2O5 ha-1, T6- 15 kg N through FYM + 10 kg N through crop residues and<br />

remaining 25 kg N through IF+30 kg P 2O 5 ha-1, T 7- 15 kg N through FYM + 10 kg N<br />

through compost and remaining 25 kg N through IF+30 kg P2O5 ha-1, T8- 15 kg N through<br />

FYM + 10 kg N through Greenleafand remaining 25 kg N through IF+30 kg P 2O 5 ha-1 and<br />

T 9- 100% RDN through IF without phosphorus and applied in maize crop. The treatments<br />

were superimposed with 4 replications in a Randomized Block Design with plot size <strong>of</strong> 6 m ×<br />

5 m. Maize crop was sown at a row-plant spacing <strong>of</strong> 60 × 25 cm and blackgram crop was<br />

sown at a row- plant spacing <strong>of</strong> 30 x 10 cm. The recommended dose <strong>of</strong> P fertilizers was<br />

434 | Page Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming, INM,<br />

soil-microorganisms-plant interactions


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

applied in all treatments except T 1: Control. The 100% RDF comprised <strong>of</strong> 50 kg ha−1 <strong>of</strong> N<br />

and 30 kg ha−1 <strong>of</strong> P 2O5. Well decomposed FYM, compost and crop residues were<br />

incorporated according to treatments 2 weeks before the sowing <strong>of</strong> maize crop in rainy<br />

season.<br />

Results<br />

Results revealed that application <strong>of</strong> 25 kg N through FYM and 25 kg N through IF+ 30 kg<br />

P 2O 5 ha-1 recorded higher mean maize grain equivalent yield (3533 kg ha-1) and higher<br />

maize equivalent stover yield (5390 kg ha-1) as compared to control (2057 kg ha-1and 2967<br />

kg ha-1, respectively).The available nitrogen content <strong>of</strong> the soil was affected by application<br />

<strong>of</strong> organic manure and chemical fertilizers. It varied from 185 kg ha-1 (control) to 265.05<br />

kgha-1 in the treatment receiving 25 kg N through FYM and 25kg N through chemical<br />

fertilizer along with 30 kg P 2O 5 ha-1. Similarly, organic carbon content, available<br />

phosphorous and available potassium significantly increased by the application <strong>of</strong> organic<br />

manure, chemical fertilizers and their combinations in comparison to control. Micronutrient<br />

status were also found higher with the application <strong>of</strong> organic sources. Whereas, pH and<br />

electric conductivity did not influence statistically significant by the application <strong>of</strong> organic<br />

sources. However, bulk density and infiltration rate significantly influenced by the<br />

application <strong>of</strong> different organic sources. Results revealed that applications <strong>of</strong> organic<br />

treatments significantly affected the population <strong>of</strong> bacteria, fungi and actinomycetes in soil<br />

and recorded higher with the application <strong>of</strong> 25 kg N through FYM and 25 kg N through<br />

IF+30 kg P2O5 ha-1. Dehydrogenase activities also observed significantly higher in organic<br />

treatments. Research findings suggested that judicious combination <strong>of</strong> manures and chemical<br />

fertilizers depending upon the availability, nature and properties <strong>of</strong> the soil and crops not only<br />

enhanced the cereal crops’ productivity, but also maintained the soil fertility (Sharma et<br />

al.2018), soil quality and optimum productivity on sustainable basis (Singh and Yadav 1992).<br />

Conservation and maintenance <strong>of</strong> a threshold level <strong>of</strong> SOM is a key consideration in<br />

sustainable crop productivity and maintenance <strong>of</strong> soil quality. Many studies have shown that<br />

balanced application <strong>of</strong> chemical fertilizers and organic manures can increase soil<br />

productivity and positively related to soil C accumulation (Srinivasarao et al. 2016).<br />

Application <strong>of</strong> organic manures can increase the SOM and enhance soil fertility (Debska et<br />

al. 2016).<br />

Conclusion<br />

Application <strong>of</strong> 25 kg N through FYM and 25 kg N through IF+ 30 kg P 2O 5 recorded 70.35 %<br />

higher mean maize grain equivalent yield and 76.2% higher maize equivalent stover yield as<br />

compared to control after fourteen years <strong>of</strong> experimentation.<br />

Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming,<br />

INM, soil-microorganisms-plant interactions<br />

435 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

References<br />

Dębska, B., Dlugosz, J., Piotrowska-Dlugosz, A., Banach-Szott, M. 2016. The impact <strong>of</strong> a<br />

bio-fertilizer on the soil organic matter status and carbon sequestration—results from a<br />

field-scale study. J Soil Sediment.16:2335–2343.<br />

Sharma, K. L., Srinivasarao, Ch., Suma Chandrika, D., Lal, M., Indoria, A. K., Sammi<br />

Reddy, K., Ravindra Chary, G., Amrutsagar, V., Kathmale, D. K., More, N. B.,<br />

Srinivas, K., Gopinath, K. A., Kalyana Srinivas, D. 2018. Effect <strong>of</strong> predominant<br />

integrated nutrient management practices on soil quality indicators and soil quality<br />

indices under post monsoon (rabi) sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) in rainfed black soils<br />

(Vertisols) <strong>of</strong> western India. Commun. Soil Sci Plant Anal. 49:1629–1637.<br />

Singh, G. B., Yadav, D. V. 1992. Integrated nutrient supply system in sugarcane and<br />

sugarcane-based cropping system. Fertil News. 37:15–22.<br />

Srinivasarao, Ch., Gopinath, K. A., Prasad, J. V. N. S., Prasannakumar, A. K., Singh. 2016.<br />

Climate resilient villages for sustainable food security in tropical India: concept,<br />

process, technologies, institutions and impacts. Adv Agron. 140:101–214.<br />

T4-02O-1260<br />

Carbon Sequestrations Impact on Black Cotton Soil under Rainfed<br />

Condition <strong>of</strong> Malwa Plateau<br />

Bharat Singh* and S.K. Sharma<br />

* singhbharat05@gmail.com<br />

The soil organic carbon is the very foundation for healthy and productive soils. The soil<br />

organic matter positively influences and modifies almost all the soil properties. Considering<br />

the role <strong>of</strong> soil organic matter in maintaining soil health, the agricultural practices that<br />

enhance the soil organic carbon are essential. Addition <strong>of</strong> organic matter through green<br />

manures plays an important role in improving productivity <strong>of</strong> crop besides improvement in<br />

soil physico-chemical properties, which <strong>of</strong>ten deteriorate under intensive cropping involving<br />

inorganic fertilization (Hiremath and Patel, 1996). The present investigation was conducted<br />

to know the effect <strong>of</strong> various treatments <strong>of</strong> soybean, maize and sunhemp (as green manure)<br />

on carbon sequestration impact in vertisols.<br />

Methodology<br />

A field experiment was conducted during the kharif season <strong>of</strong> 2017-18 atCollege <strong>of</strong><br />

Agriculture, Indore, India. The experiment was carried out with 8 treatments and replicated<br />

thrice in a randomized block design (RBD). The treatments includedsoybean + sunhemp (2:1)<br />

436 | Page Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming, INM,<br />

soil-microorganisms-plant interactions


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

at 30 cm; soybean + sunhemp (1:1) at 45 cm; sole soybean at 45 cm; maize + sunhemp (2:1)<br />

at 45 cm; maize + sunhemp (1:1) at 30 cm; sole maize at 60 cm; soybean + maize (1:1) at 45<br />

cm; sole sunhemp at 30 cm. The green manuring crop sunhemp, soybean (cv. JS 95- 60) and<br />

maize (cv. K 604 Hybrid) were sown in the last week <strong>of</strong> June. The soybean and maize were<br />

grown with 20:60:40 and 120:60:40 kg ha -1 recommended dose <strong>of</strong> N: P2O5:K2O,<br />

respectively. The sunhemp was incorporated in the first week <strong>of</strong> August.<br />

Results<br />

In 0- 15 cm soil depth, highest soil moisture content was observed in the treatment sole<br />

sunhemp at 30 cm followed by treatment Soybean + sunhemp (1:1) at 45 cm. The sole<br />

sunhemp cropping registered 35-40% and 33-37% higher soil moisture in 0-15 and 15-30 cm<br />

soil depth, respectively as compared to sole soybean and maize crop. The intercropping also<br />

showed 20-26% higher soil moisture in different depths as compared to sole cropping. The<br />

soil bulk density was found lowest in the treatment <strong>of</strong> sole sunhemp at 30 cm significantly<br />

reduced over the other treatments. The soil porosity analyzed after harvest <strong>of</strong> the crops<br />

ranged between 47.4% in treatment <strong>of</strong> sole Maize at 60 cm and 51.3% in treatment <strong>of</strong> sole<br />

sunhemp at 30 cm. The soil porosity remained unaffected irrespective either intercropping<br />

and/or green manuring. The treatments soybean + sunhemp (2:1) at 30 cm, Soybean +<br />

sunhemp (1:1) at 45 cmand sole sunhemp at 30 cm were found to be statistically at par with<br />

respect to the MWD but significantly superior over the other treatments under study. The<br />

increase in MWD <strong>of</strong> soil mainly attributed to the increase in soil organic carbon content<br />

(Tiarkset al., 1974).<br />

The soil pH remained unaffected irrespective either intercropping and/or green manuring.<br />

The treatment sole sunhemp at 30 cm, soybean + sunhemp (1:1) at 45 cm, Soybean +<br />

sunhemp (2:1) at 30 cm, maize + sunhemp (2:1) at 45 cm and maize + sunhemp (1:1) at 30<br />

cm recorded significantly higher soil organic carbon as compared to the other treatments. The<br />

highest bacterial population was observed under the treatment sole sunhemp at 30 cm,<br />

whereas, the lowest was observed under sole maize cultivation at 60 cm row to row spacing.<br />

The highest fungal and actinomycetes population was found under sole green manure<br />

cropping i.e. treatment sole sunhemp at 30 cm, whereas the lowest was observed under<br />

Soybean + Maize (1:1) at 45 cm and sole soybean at 45 cm, respectively.<br />

The enhanced microbial population upon application <strong>of</strong> different sources <strong>of</strong> organic matter is<br />

in close agreement with present results (Aheret al., 2018). The incorporation <strong>of</strong> sunhemp as<br />

green manure crop intercropped with soybean and maize showed positive response on<br />

physico-chemical and microbial properties <strong>of</strong> soil.<br />

Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming,<br />

INM, soil-microorganisms-plant interactions<br />

437 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Conclusion<br />

The green manure intercrop treatments significantly enhanced soil organic carbon and<br />

improved physical, chemical and biological properties <strong>of</strong> soil and reflected as viable<br />

technique in improving soil health.<br />

References<br />

Aher, S. B., Lakaria, B. L., Swami K., Singh, A. B., Ramana, S., Thakur, J. K., Biswas, A.<br />

K., Jha, P., Manna, M. C. and Yashona, D. S. 2018. Soil microbial population and<br />

enzyme activities under organic, biodynamic and conventional agriculture in semi-arid<br />

tropical conditions <strong>of</strong> central India. J. Exp. Biol. Agric. Sci., 6(5): 763-773.<br />

Hiremath, S. M. and Patel, Z. G. 1996. Biomass production, N-accumulation and nodulation<br />

<strong>of</strong> green manure species during winter season. J. Maharashtra Agric. Univ. 21: 55-57.<br />

Tiarks, A. E., Mazurak, A. P. and Chesnin, L. 1974. Physical and chemical properties <strong>of</strong> soil<br />

associated with heavy applications <strong>of</strong> manure from cattle feedlots. Soil Sci. Soc. Am.<br />

Proc.,38: 826-830.<br />

T4-03O-1394<br />

Bio-Fertilizers Mediated Integrated Nutrient Management for<br />

Sustaining the Chickpea Productivity Under Rainfed Vertisols <strong>of</strong><br />

SouthIndia<br />

M.N. Ramesha 1* , S.L. Patil 2 , K.N. Ravi 1 and M. Prabhavathi 1<br />

1 ICAR-Indian Institute <strong>of</strong> Soil &Water Conservation, Research Centre, Ballari, Karnataka 583 104, India<br />

2 ICAR- Indian Institute Pulse Research, Regional Research Centre, Dharwad, 580 005, India<br />

* MN.Ramesha@icar.gov.in<br />

Increasing demand for nutritionally fortified quality foods and challenges <strong>of</strong> soil fertility<br />

maintenance is a big concern for future sustainable food production with respect to source<br />

<strong>of</strong> fertilizer input used and energy required for their production. The resources available<br />

with the farming community and their socio-economic aspects warrant the adoption <strong>of</strong><br />

alternative strategies for enhancing the use efficiency <strong>of</strong> inputs and environmental safety.<br />

The microbe’s adaptability and ability to thrive in different environments, low cost <strong>of</strong> their<br />

production and environmental safety aspects, has prompted introduction <strong>of</strong> microbial<br />

intervention in the crop production (Sarkar et al., 2021). Literature envisages that the use<br />

<strong>of</strong> low-cost technologies i.e. N fixing, P solubilizing microbial consortium and supply <strong>of</strong><br />

deficient micronutrients (Zn and Fe) will enhance the productivity and pr<strong>of</strong>itability <strong>of</strong><br />

pulses (Nosheenet al., 2021; Rafiqueet al., 2021). In India the pulse production has<br />

438 | Page Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming, INM,<br />

soil-microorganisms-plant interactions


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

gradually increased to 25.58 MT in 2020-21however, countryhas a target <strong>of</strong> achieving 32<br />

and 39 MT by 2030 and 2050, respectively. Therefore, the productivity <strong>of</strong> pulse crops has<br />

to increase for meeting the growing demand. Among the pulse crops, chickpea is the<br />

important crop with 49% <strong>of</strong> total pulses productionin the country (Gaur, 2021). Lower<br />

productivity <strong>of</strong> pulsesis attributed to the use <strong>of</strong> traditional cultivars, cultivation on<br />

marginal lands without proper nutrient management, irrigation and disease and pest<br />

control at right time. Further, reduction in the use <strong>of</strong> organic amendments and<br />

deficiencies <strong>of</strong> micronutrients especially zinc and iron hindering pulse productivity<br />

(Patil et al., 2018). Hence, anexperiment was conducted at Research Farm, ICAR-IISWC,<br />

Bellari, to know the effect <strong>of</strong> bio-fertilizers mediated integrated nutrient management on<br />

chickpea productivity under rainfed Vertisols <strong>of</strong> south India.<br />

Methodology<br />

Treatments covers two main fertilizer application practices, viz., farmer’s practice (10:25,<br />

N:P and 2.5 tons FYM once in three years) as T 1 and recommended rate <strong>of</strong> fertilizer<br />

application (25:50 N:P and 5 tons FYM once in three years) as T2. These two treatments<br />

were supplemented with bio-fertilizers viz., Rhizobium culture, phosphate solubilizing<br />

bacteria (PSB), plant growth promoting Rhizobacteria (PGPR) to constitute T 3 and T 6<br />

treatments. Further, micronutrient zinc supplied with fertilizer application constitutes the<br />

T 4 and T 7. Combined effects <strong>of</strong>bio-fertilizers and a micronutrient with main fertilizer<br />

application practices were tested in T 5 and T 8treatments, respectively. Finally, to test the<br />

effect <strong>of</strong> foliar application, T2 was supplemented with foliar application <strong>of</strong> NPK (19:19:19<br />

one kg ha -1 ) and NK (KNO 3, one kg ha -1 ) at 5 g L -1 30 days after sowing, as treatments T 9<br />

and T10, respectively. During 2021, total rainfall received was 74% higher (897 mm) than<br />

the mean annual rainfall <strong>of</strong> the location. The crop was sown during October 2021 with<br />

receipt <strong>of</strong> 55.5 mm <strong>of</strong> rainfall prior to sowing. Crop season rainfall was 270 mm, which<br />

was 88% higher than the normal rabi season average rainfall <strong>of</strong> 65 years. The crop<br />

growth wasbelow normal during 2021-22 due to excess rain (217.5 mm) in November<br />

2021.<br />

Results<br />

The treatment T 8 with application <strong>of</strong> recommended rate <strong>of</strong> fertilizer, bi<strong>of</strong>ertilizers and zinc,<br />

produced significantly higher grain yield (973 kg ha -1 ), straw yield (1297 kg ha -1 ), total dry<br />

matter production (2269 kg ha -1 ) and water use efficiency (WUE) <strong>of</strong> 3.48 kg ha -1 mm -1<br />

over T 2, T 3 and T 1. Among the treatments having farmer's rate <strong>of</strong> fertilizer the treatment T 5<br />

with bi<strong>of</strong>ertilizers and zinc application produced higher grain yield (848 kg ha -1 ), straw<br />

yield (1130 kg ha -1 ), total dry matter production (1978 kg ha -1 ) and water use efficiency<br />

(WUE) <strong>of</strong> 3.03 kg ha -1 mm -1 over T 1. The grain yield, straw yield, total dry matter<br />

Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming,<br />

INM, soil-microorganisms-plant interactions<br />

439 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

production and WUE was higher in T 8 by 50%, 53%, 52% and 50% compared to T 1. Greater<br />

yields in T8 and T6 compared to other treatments are attributed to better crop growth with<br />

higher root length, nodules per plant and weight <strong>of</strong> nodules and greater dry matter<br />

translocation to yield components during adverse rainfall situation and effect <strong>of</strong> bi<strong>of</strong>ertilizer,<br />

zinc withrecommended rate <strong>of</strong> chemical fertilizer. The cost <strong>of</strong> cultivation<br />

remains high in the treatments that have recommended rate <strong>of</strong> fertilizer application.<br />

Significantly higher gross return(15%) was in T8with only 0.6% higher net return than the<br />

T 5. The B:C ratio was higher in T 5 (1.28) followed by T 8 and T 4 (1.24). Higher net returns<br />

<strong>of</strong> ₹ 8,046 and ₹ 8,314 ha -1 was recorded in T 3 and T 4, respectively as compared to lower<br />

net returns <strong>of</strong> ₹ 3,659 ha -1 recorded in T2indicates significance <strong>of</strong> bio-fertilizers and<br />

micronutrient in reducing the cost <strong>of</strong> cultivation and improving overall farm enterprise<br />

income. Total energy output (37279 MJ ha -1 ) and net energy benefit (32006 MJ ha -1 ) were<br />

significantly higher in T 8and was attributed to greater grain and straw yields produced in<br />

T 8. Energy use efficiency (7.07) and energy productivity (0.189 MJ ha -1 ) were significantly<br />

higher in T5. It indicates that the effect <strong>of</strong> low-cost technologies like bio-fertilizers and<br />

micronutrient supplements significantly improves the crop performance in terms <strong>of</strong> energy<br />

usage.<br />

Conclusion<br />

We can conclude that the treatment T 8with recommended rate <strong>of</strong> fertilizer<br />

applicationwith bio-fertilizers and a micronutrient sustains Chickpea productivity by<br />

producing higher grain yield, straw yield, total dry matter production, WUE, energy use<br />

efficiency, net returns and B:C ratio under above normal rainfall situations on the<br />

Vertisols <strong>of</strong> Bellariregion in southern India.<br />

Technical staff associated with the experiment Mr. B.N. Seshadri, Mr. G. Bhati and A.<br />

Kumar are appreciated for research plots maintenance and data generation.<br />

References<br />

Gaur, P. 2021. Can India sustain high growth <strong>of</strong> pulses production? J. Food Leg. 34(1): 1-3.<br />

Nosheen, S.; Ajmal, I.; Song, Y. 2021. Microbes as Bi<strong>of</strong>ertilizers, a Potential Approach for<br />

Sustainable Crop Production. Sustainability. 13: 1868. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13041868<br />

Patil, S. L., Loganandhan, N., Ramesha, M.N., Adhikary. P.P. and K. Channabasappa.<br />

2018. Energy Consumption and Sensitivity Analysis <strong>of</strong> Rainfed Chickpea Production<br />

in Vertisols<strong>of</strong> Semi-arid Karnataka. Proc. National Acad. Sci. India, Sec. B<br />

Bio.Sci.88(2):685-694.<br />

440 | Page Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming, INM,<br />

soil-microorganisms-plant interactions


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Rafique, M., Naveed, M., Mustafa, A., Akhtar, S., Munawar, M., Kaukab, S., Ali, R.M.,<br />

Siddiqui, M.H. and Salem, M.Z.M. 2021. The combined effects <strong>of</strong>gibberellic acid and<br />

rhizobium on growth, yield & nutritional status in chickpea. Agronomy11(1):<br />

105;https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomyl1010105.<br />

Sarkar, D., Rakshit, A., Al-Turki, A.I., Sayyed, R.Z., Datta, R. 2021. Connecting biopriming<br />

approach with integrated nutrient management for improved nutrient use<br />

efficiency in crop species. Agriculture 11: 372.<br />

https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture11040372.<br />

T4-03aO-1636<br />

Integrated organic farming systems: Sustainable approach for harnessing<br />

food-energy -carbon nexus in agricultural production systems<br />

Subhash Babu 1 *, Anup Das 2 , V.K. Singh 3 , Jyoti D. Gaikwad 4 , S.S. Rathore 1 ,<br />

P.K. Upadhayay 1 , R.K. Singh 1 and Raj Singh<br />

1<br />

Division <strong>of</strong> Agronomy, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, India<br />

2<br />

ICAR Research Complex for NEH Region, Tripura Centre, Tripura, India<br />

3<br />

ICAR-Central Research Institute on Dryland Agriculture, Hyderabad, India<br />

4<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Agronomy, NAU, Navsari, Gujrat, India<br />

* subhiari@gmail.com<br />

Globally the agricultural production system is challenged by the climate change adversities,<br />

resource depletion, land degradation, low energy productivity and high Carbon foot print.<br />

The farming sector is highly sensitive to climatic uncertainties and is also highly impacted by<br />

population growth, resource scarcity, and environmental degradation (Babu et al.,2021).<br />

COP27 emphasized on development <strong>of</strong> sustainable agriculture food systems that can reduce<br />

its environmental footprint and resilient to climate vulnerabilities. Attaining a balance in the<br />

food-energy trade-<strong>of</strong>f while conserving the natural resources base and minimizing<br />

greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions for attaining sustainable development goals is one <strong>of</strong> the<br />

major challenges for the resource-poor farmers in India. Bridging the food-energy demand<br />

and supply gap while preserving the ecosystem sustainability and food security is one <strong>of</strong> the<br />

pressing challenges for researchers, and policymakers. Integration <strong>of</strong> the different farm<br />

enterprises like crops, livestock, etc. plays a synergistic role in food production, growers'<br />

livelihood, and provisioning <strong>of</strong> different ecosystem services (Martínez et al. 2007; Lu et al.<br />

2019; Lal, 2020). Thus, edifice up the inextricable soil-water-food and energy nexus for a<br />

strong agricultural production system should play a vital role in bringing in a balance<br />

between higher productivity and ecosystem sustainability. Therefore, it was hypothesized that<br />

Integrated organic farming system shall reduce farmland waste, and minimize the land<br />

degradation while sustaining higher productivity, and pr<strong>of</strong>itability.<br />

Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming,<br />

INM, soil-microorganisms-plant interactions<br />

441 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Methodology<br />

The productivity, pr<strong>of</strong>itability, energy security, and environmental sustainability <strong>of</strong> four<br />

Integrated Organic Farming System models (viz., IOFS -I, mono-cropping+livestock; IOFS -<br />

II, diversified cropping+livestock; IOFS -III, diversified cropping+livestock+poultry, and<br />

IOFS -IV, diversified cropping+ livestock+ poultry+ piggery) were assessed in Meghalaya<br />

region <strong>of</strong> Indian Himalayas. The system productivity <strong>of</strong> different systems was evaluated to<br />

assess their production capacity. For a meaningful comparison <strong>of</strong> different production<br />

systems, all products were converted into the rice equivalent yield i.e. system productivity.<br />

Energy auditing explores an efficiency edge between an input-output relationship in different<br />

production systems. Carbon footprint both at a spatial scale and yield scale and eco-efficiency<br />

considering energy input and emission <strong>of</strong> GHG per unit <strong>of</strong> economic gain were assessed to<br />

compare the environmental competency <strong>of</strong> integrated production systems. General Linear<br />

Model version SAS 9.4 was used to test the statistical significance <strong>of</strong> data obtained from<br />

diverse production systems. The least significant difference (LSD) and standard error <strong>of</strong> the<br />

mean was employed for valid comparison <strong>of</strong> data among the different IOFS models.<br />

Results<br />

All the integrated organic farming systems had higher energy pr<strong>of</strong>itability and substantially<br />

reduced greenhouse gas intensity (GHGI) over IOFS-I. IOFS -IV recorded considerably<br />

higher net pr<strong>of</strong>it (US$. 2828.5 y -1 ), energy productivity (0.22 kg MJ -1 ), and the lowest GHGI<br />

(0.33 kg CO 2eq kg -1 food production) over other production systems. GHG (kg -1 production)<br />

emissions <strong>of</strong> IOFS-IV were also 1.7 times lower than that <strong>of</strong> IOFS -I. Furthermore, IOFS -IV<br />

had recycled 81.1, 68.2, and 68.8% higher N, P, and K over the IOFS-1, respectively. Thus,<br />

the study suggested that IOFS -IV could be a pr<strong>of</strong>itable, energy-efficient, environmentally<br />

friendly, and economically viable sustainable production system for the Indian Himalayan<br />

region.<br />

References<br />

Babu Subhash, Mohapatra, K.P., Das, A., Yadav, G.S., Singh, R., Chandra, P., Avasthe, R. K., Kumar<br />

Amit, Thoithoi Devi, M., Singh, V. K. and Panwar, A. S. 2021. Integrated Farming Systems:<br />

Climate-Resilient Sustainable Food Production System in the Indian Himalayan Region. In:<br />

Exploring Synergies and Trade-<strong>of</strong>fs Between Climate Change and the Sustainable Development<br />

Goals, V. Venkatramanan, Shachi Shah and Ram Prasad (Eds.): 119-143.<br />

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-7301-9_6<br />

Lal, R. 2009. Soil degradation as a reason for inadequate human nutrition. Food Secur. 1(1): 45-57.<br />

DOI:10.1007/s12571-009-0009-z.<br />

Lu, S., Bai, X., Li, W., Wang, N. 2019. Impacts <strong>of</strong> climate change on water resources and grain<br />

production. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change. 143:76-84. DOI:10.1016/j.techfore.2019.01.015<br />

442 | Page Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming, INM,<br />

soil-microorganisms-plant interactions


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Martínez M.L., Intralawan A., Vázquez G., Pérez-Maqueo O., Sutton P., Landgrave R. 2007. The<br />

coasts <strong>of</strong> our world: Ecological, economic and social importance. Ecol. Econ. 63(2-3): 254-<br />

272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.10.022.<br />

T4-04R-1217<br />

Impact <strong>of</strong> Long- Term Fertilization and Manuring on Aggregate Stability<br />

and Biochemical Characterization <strong>of</strong> Aggregate Associated C in the Alfisols<br />

Suvana Sukumaran 1* , T. J. Purakayastha 2 , Bidisha Chakrabarti 2 ,<br />

K. K. Bandyopadhyay 2 , ThulasiViswanathe 3 , K. K. Rout 4 , K. Sammi Reddy 1 and<br />

A.K. Indoria 1<br />

1 ICAR-Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, Hyderabad, India,<br />

2 ICAR- Indian Agricultural research Institute, New Delhi,<br />

3 Regional Agricultural Research Station, Pattambi, Kerala,<br />

4 Orissa University <strong>of</strong> Agriculture and Technology, Bhubaneswar, Odisha<br />

* suvana.sukumaran@icar.gov.in<br />

Different land use and land cover management practices affect soil aggregation, which inturn<br />

affect soil C retention. The SOC in the pr<strong>of</strong>ile can be stabilised by three mechanisms mainly-<br />

physical protection by organo-mineral complexes, biochemical stability to decomposition and<br />

chemical protection by adsorption to clay surfaces. The decomposition rate <strong>of</strong> C is directly<br />

proportional to the size <strong>of</strong> aggregates. Chemical association <strong>of</strong> SOC with silt and clay<br />

particles can also impose a limit to the soil’s C stabilization potential due to a limit in the<br />

surface area <strong>of</strong> the silt-plus-clay fraction in a given soil. Biochemical stabilization <strong>of</strong> SOM in<br />

the soil matrix is a strong function <strong>of</strong> the inherent chemical and structural stability <strong>of</strong> the<br />

organic biomolecules. Soil aggregate dynamics and SOM decomposition are closely linked.<br />

The present study was undertaken to study the effect <strong>of</strong> long-term manuring and fertilization<br />

on the physical and biochemical stability <strong>of</strong> aggregates and the associated carbon in the ricerice<br />

cropping system <strong>of</strong> the Alfisols <strong>of</strong> Bhubaneswar (BHNS) and Pattambi (PTMB).<br />

Methodology<br />

This study was carried out in two long term fertilizer experiments continuing in Bhubaneswar<br />

(Orissa) and Pattambi (Kerala), where rice- rice was the main cropping system. The<br />

experimental site at Bhubaneswar has tropical and sub-humid climate, whereas that at<br />

Pattambi has perhumid. The soils at Bhubaneswar were acidic sandy loam and at Pattambi<br />

were acidic sandy clay loam. The following treatments were considered for the study:T1-<br />

control, T2- 50 % NPK, T3- 100%NPK, T4- 150 % NPK, T5- 100%NPK+ FYM ( 10 t ha -1 ),<br />

T6- 100%NPK + Lime. The soil samples were collected from 0-15 and 15-30 cm depth. The<br />

aggregate size distribution was done using wet sieving method. The total carbon content in<br />

the sample was determined by dry combustion in CHNS analyser (Eurovector, model Euro<br />

Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming,<br />

INM, soil-microorganisms-plant interactions<br />

443 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

EA3000). The glomalin content <strong>of</strong> aggregate samples were extracted using 50 mM sodium<br />

tricitrate, pH 8.0, 121OC for 1 hr (Wright and Upadhyay, 1999). The total polysaccharides<br />

were analyzed by phenol sulphuric acid method by Lowe (1994). The total carbohydrate was<br />

analyzed by phenol sulphuric acid methodby Dubois et al, (1956). Total polyphenols <strong>of</strong> POM<br />

fractions were determined by Prussian Blue spectrophotometric method.<br />

Results<br />

The effect <strong>of</strong> different treatments on mean weight diameter (MWD), geometric mean<br />

diameter (GMD) and water stable macro-aggregates (WSMA) in the rice-rice cropping<br />

system <strong>of</strong> BHNS and PTMBare given in the table. The study showed that the C associated<br />

with 2.00-0.25mm aggregates varied from 3.53 g kg -1 in 50 % NPK to 10.11 g kg -1 in plots<br />

treated with 100% NPK+FYM in soils <strong>of</strong> BHNS and from 11.7 g kg -1 in control to 23.1 g kg<br />

-1<br />

in plots treated with 100%NPK+FYM in that <strong>of</strong> PTMB. In the 0.25-0.053 mm fraction,<br />

inBHNS,100% NPK+FYM (11.1 g kg -1 ) had higher C content, whereas in the effect <strong>of</strong><br />

different treatments on biochemical stability <strong>of</strong> aggregates showed that addition <strong>of</strong> 100%<br />

NPK+FYM increased glomalin content (3.43 mg g -1 ) significantly in macro aggregates and<br />

also in micro-aggregates (3.25 mg g -1 ) in BNHS. Similar trend was observed in both the<br />

macro and micro-aggregates <strong>of</strong> PTMB. The combined application <strong>of</strong> FYM with 100% NPK<br />

significantly increased polysaccharide content in macro-aggregates (i.e. 6.09 g kg -1 ) and<br />

micro-aggregates (5.6 times compared to control) indicating that addition <strong>of</strong> FYM increases<br />

biochemical stability <strong>of</strong> aggregates at BHNS. However, in the soils <strong>of</strong> PTMB, the application<br />

<strong>of</strong> 150% NPK increased polysaccharide content in the macro-aggregate fractions and the<br />

combined application <strong>of</strong> FYM with 100% NPK (i.e. 12.8 g kg -1 ) in micro-aggregates<br />

compared to other treatments. The biochemical stability <strong>of</strong> micro-aggregates with application<br />

<strong>of</strong> fertilizers only, was significantly lower in general. The control soils had the lowest<br />

polysaccharide content and hence biochemical stability. The addition <strong>of</strong> either FYM or lime<br />

with 100% NPK significantly increased carbohydrate content in the POM fractions obtained<br />

from aggregates at both the sites. Addition <strong>of</strong> FYM with 100% NPK significantly increased<br />

polyphenol content by 1.73 times and by 1.65 times in the POM fractions at BHNS and<br />

PTMB respectively.<br />

Long-term effect <strong>of</strong> manuring and fertilization on mean weight diameter (MWD),<br />

geometric mean diameter (GMD) and water stable macro aggregate (WSMA>0.25mm) at<br />

0-15 and 15-30 cm soil under rice-rice cropping system in Bhubaneswar and Pattambi<br />

Treatments<br />

Bhubaneswar<br />

MWD (mm) GMD (mm) WSMA >.25mm<br />

0-15 cm 15-30 cm 0-15 cm 15-30 cm 0-15 cm 15-30 cm<br />

50% NPK 0.88bc 0.92c 1.001e§ 1.003c 0.69c 0.74d<br />

444 | Page Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming, INM,<br />

soil-microorganisms-plant interactions


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

100% NPK 0.83c§ 0.88c 1.002c 1.002d 0.69c 0.72d<br />

150% NPK 0.90b 1.09b 1.003bc 1.003cd 0.74b 0.85c<br />

100% NPK + FYM 1.03a 1.29a 1.004a 1.004b 0.83a 0.95a<br />

100% NPK + LIME 1.08a 1.10b 1.002d 1.005a 0.75b 0.90b<br />

CONTROL 0.77d§ 0.68d§ 1.003b 1.001e§ 0.58d§ 0.53e§<br />

Pattambi<br />

50%NPK 1.00a 0.93c§ 1.003a 1.004bc 0.79ab 0.74c<br />

100%NPK 1.07a 1.03ab 1.004a 1.003d 0.86a 0.83b<br />

150%NPK 1.05a 1.05ab 1.005a 1.005a 0.85a 0.86ab<br />

100%NPK +LIME 1.03a 1.00b 1.004a 1.004ab 0.83ab 0.83b<br />

100%NPK +FYM 1.11a 1.09a 1.004a 1.005a 0.84a 0.87a<br />

CONTROL 0.99a 1.06ab 1.004a 1.003d§ 0.77b§ 0.77c§<br />

Conclusion<br />

The balanced NPK fertilization or integration <strong>of</strong> either FYM or lime with recommended<br />

doses <strong>of</strong> NPK (100%NPK) emerged effective management strategies for enhancing physical,<br />

chemical and biochemical stabilization <strong>of</strong> carbon for long-term carbon sequestration in<br />

Alfisols <strong>of</strong> India.<br />

References<br />

Wright, S.F. and Upadhyaya, A. 1999. Quantification <strong>of</strong> arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi<br />

activity by the glomalin concentration on hyphal traps. Mycorrhiza, 8(5), pp.283-285.<br />

Dubois, M., Gilles, K.A., Hamilton, J.K., Rebers, P.A.T. and Smith, F., 1956. Colorimetric<br />

method for determination <strong>of</strong> sugars and related substances. Anal.Chem., 28(3):350-<br />

356.<br />

T4-05R-1032<br />

Response <strong>of</strong> Microbial Consortia on Productivity <strong>of</strong> Sorghum (Sorghum<br />

BicolarL.) and Soil Quality under Rainfed Condition<br />

P.H. Gourkhede*, W.N. Narkhede, M.S. Pendke and R.S. Raut<br />

All India Coordinated Research Project on Dryland Agriculture<br />

Vasantrao Naik Marathwada Krishi Vidyapeeth, Parbhani-431402(MS), India<br />

* pathrikar2012@gmail.com<br />

Sorghum is grownon considerable area under rainfed condition in Marathwada region both in<br />

kharif and rabiseason. However, the productivity <strong>of</strong> sorghum particularly in kharif season is<br />

fluctuating. Also, sorghum is grown largely for fodder production in kharif season. Occurrence<br />

<strong>of</strong> frequent dryspells in Marathawada region is a common phenomenon which has a direct<br />

Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming,<br />

INM, soil-microorganisms-plant interactions<br />

445 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

impact on the production and productivity. Drought is one <strong>of</strong> the main environmental factors that<br />

negatively affect plant growth and development and productivity. In plants, drought is associated<br />

with other stresses, for example, osmotic stress produced by dehydration, which diminishes cell<br />

expansion. A microbial consortium involves two or more microbial groups living symbiotically.<br />

Consortia can be endosymbiotic or ectosymbiotic. Microbial consortium is specially formulated<br />

microbial inoculants. It contains N- fixing, P and Zn solubilizing and K mobilizing and plant<br />

growth promoting bacteria. To increase the productivity <strong>of</strong> sorghum in kharif season, an<br />

experiment was conducted to study the response <strong>of</strong> microbial consortia on productivity <strong>of</strong><br />

sorghum (sorghum bicolar L.) and soil quality under rainfed conditions <strong>of</strong> Marathawadaregion.<br />

Methodology<br />

The study was conducted at research farm <strong>of</strong> All India Coordinated Research Project on Dry<br />

Land Agriculture, VNMKV, Parbhani during kharif season 2018-20. The experiment comprises<br />

<strong>of</strong> seven treatments including two types <strong>of</strong> microbial consortia culture (C1 & C2) along with<br />

three methods (seed, soil and seed + soil) <strong>of</strong> culture application and was laid out in a randomized<br />

block design with three replications. Microbial consortia culture (C1& C2) was procured from<br />

ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad before sowing <strong>of</strong> the experiment. For seed treatment, microbial<br />

consortia culture (C 1&C 2 ) were applied @ 250g 10 Kg -1 <strong>of</strong> seed and for soil application 2.5 kg<br />

culture powder ha -1 were applied,immediately before sowing. The recommended doses <strong>of</strong><br />

chemical fertilizer were applied at the time <strong>of</strong> sowing.<br />

Results<br />

Yield and monetary returns:<br />

Application <strong>of</strong> microbial consortia significantly increased grain yield, straw yield and returns <strong>of</strong><br />

sorghum. Application <strong>of</strong> microbial consortia C 2 in T 6 (Seed treatment + Soil appication <strong>of</strong><br />

consortia 2) gave grain and straw yield i.e. 2510 and 7279 Kg ha -1 respectively as compared to<br />

other treatment. However, it was at par with treatment T 3 (Seed tresatment + Soil application <strong>of</strong><br />

consortia 1). Similar trend was recorded in case <strong>of</strong> gross returns (GR), net returns (NR) and B: C<br />

ratio. The production <strong>of</strong> proline and osmoregulantsenabled the crop to withstand the water stress<br />

due to dry spell. These isolates were capable <strong>of</strong> increasing shoot and leaf biomass, shoot length<br />

and photosynthesis. (Kavya et al. 2015)<br />

Grain yield, straw yield (Kgha -1 ), GMR, NMR and B: C ratio as influenced with use <strong>of</strong><br />

Consortia culture in sorghum<br />

Treatments<br />

Grain yield<br />

(Kg ha -1 )<br />

Straw yield<br />

(Kg ha -1 )<br />

G R<br />

(Rs.)<br />

N R<br />

(Rs.)<br />

B:C Ratio<br />

T 1: Seed treatment (C 1) 1952 4489 63243 38943 2.60<br />

446 | Page Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming, INM,<br />

soil-microorganisms-plant interactions


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

T 2: Soil application (C 1) 2140 5136 69978 45078 2.81<br />

T 3: Seed treatment+ Soil<br />

application(C 1)<br />

2485 6709 83494 58094 3.28<br />

T 4: Seed treatment (C 2) 1997 5592 67699 43399 2.78<br />

T 5: Soil application (C 2) 2018 6054 69621 44721 2.79<br />

T 6: Seed treatment + Soil<br />

application (C 2)<br />

2510 7279 85842 60542 3.39<br />

T 7: Absolute control 1938 5233 65118 42818 2.92<br />

SE 359 2521 2421 2801 0.69<br />

CD 1106 7767 7462 8630 2.14<br />

C 1 – Consortia culture 1 C 2 – Consortia culture 2<br />

Proline content:<br />

Proline content in sorghum leaf after harvest was significantly high (1.89 ug g-1) with treatment<br />

T6followed by treatment T3. The effect <strong>of</strong> microbial culture on proline content in sorghum leaf<br />

after dry spell was non-significant. Similar results were reported by Kalindee Shinde and Borkar.<br />

(2013) in sorghum seed bacterialization with four rhizobacterial isolate viz., Serratia marcescens<br />

L1SC8, Pseudomonas putida L3SC1, Enterobacter cloacae L1CcC1 and Serratia marcescens.<br />

L2FmA4 were found beneficial to mitigate drought stress effect in sorghum.<br />

Proline content (ug g -1 ) in sorghum leaf at after dry spell and at harvest stage as Influenced<br />

with use <strong>of</strong> consortia culture<br />

Treatments<br />

Proline content at<br />

flowering stage<br />

(ug g -1 )<br />

Proline content<br />

at Harvest<br />

(ug g -1 )<br />

T 1: Seed treatment <strong>of</strong> consortia (C 1) 0.90 1.09<br />

T 2: Soil application <strong>of</strong> consortia (C 1) 0.69 1.03<br />

T 3: Seed treatment + Soil application <strong>of</strong> consortia (C 1) 0.80 1.10<br />

T 4: Seed treatment <strong>of</strong> consortia (C 2) 0.86 1.18<br />

T 5: Soil application <strong>of</strong> consortia (C 2) 0.85 1.12<br />

T 6: Seed treatment + Soil application <strong>of</strong> consortia (C 2) 0.79 1.89<br />

T 7: Absolute control 0.07 0.88<br />

SE 0.02 0.44<br />

CD 0.06 1.36<br />

C 1 – Consortia culture 1 C 2 – Consortia culture 2<br />

Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming,<br />

INM, soil-microorganisms-plant interactions<br />

447 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Conclusions<br />

1. Use <strong>of</strong> treatment (T6) Seed treatment + Soil application <strong>of</strong> microbial consortia (C2)<br />

produced significantly higher Grain and straw yield, GMR, NMR and B:C ratio insorghum<br />

under moisture stress condition.<br />

2. The dual inoculation <strong>of</strong> microbial consortia culture (C2) through Seed treatment and<br />

soilapplication significantly increased moisture retention and proline content <strong>of</strong> soil<br />

atharvesting stages <strong>of</strong> sorghum crop.<br />

References<br />

Kalindee Shinde, S. and Borkar, S.G. 2018. ACC deaminase activity <strong>of</strong> bacterial species<br />

involved in conferring drought tolerance in sorghum (Sorghum biolorL). Int. J. Chemical<br />

Stud. 6(6): 1314-1316<br />

Kavya, Y., Trimurthulu, N., Vijaya Gopal, A., Madhu Vani. and Prasad, N. V. 2020. Effect <strong>of</strong><br />

inoculation <strong>of</strong> microbial consortia on soil physicochemical and nutrient status. British J.<br />

Appl. Sci. Tech., 39(4): 1-8<br />

T4-06R-1055<br />

Soil Moisture Stress Alters the Abundance <strong>of</strong> Maize Root Associated<br />

Bacteria<br />

M. Manjunath, N. Jyothilakshmi, S. Vijayalakshmi, S. K. Yadav, M. Prabhakar,<br />

K. A. Gopinath, G. Ravindrachary and V. K. Singh<br />

ICAR-Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, Santoshnagar, Hyderabad – 500 059,<br />

Telangana, India.<br />

Plants and microorganisms have coevolved over the years. The plant microbiome comprises<br />

<strong>of</strong> rhizospheric, endophytic and epiphytic microorganisms (Rout 2014). Rhizo-microbiome<br />

significantly influences the plant health, growth and productivity (Chaudhari et al. 2020).<br />

They play a vital role in managing various biotic and abiotic stresses. Increased scarcity and<br />

competition for water has become a key threat to food security and poverty alleviation.<br />

Drought considerably changes the composition <strong>of</strong> bacterial and fungal communities<br />

indicating that, this restructured microbiome might help the plant survival under adverse<br />

environmental situations (Santos-Medellin et al. 2017). Thorough knowledge <strong>of</strong> crop specific<br />

microbiome would help to modulate the microbiome in a way that would lead to better<br />

growth and development <strong>of</strong> crop plants (Rascovan et al. 2016). Keeping this in view, a study<br />

was conducted to know the effect <strong>of</strong> soil moisture stress on the composition <strong>of</strong> maize root<br />

associated bacteria.<br />

448 | Page Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming, INM,<br />

soil-microorganisms-plant interactions


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Methodology<br />

The total genomic DNA was isolated from 0.25 g soil sample using soil DNA isolation kit.<br />

Qubit 4.0 Fluorimeter was used to estimate the DNA concentration. V3-V4 region <strong>of</strong> 16S<br />

rRNA amplified using V3 forward primer and V4 reverse primer. The amplified product was<br />

checked on 2% agarose gel. NEB Next Ultra DNA library preparation kit was used for library<br />

preparation. The prepared libraries were sequenced in Illumina HiSeqplatform for 2x250bp<br />

read length. Raw sequence data was merged and filtered to get clean data. De novo chimeric<br />

sequences were detected using Vsearch and only non-chimeric sequence were further used.<br />

16S rRNA sequences were clustered into Operation Taxonomic Units (OTUs) at a similarity<br />

cut-<strong>of</strong>f value <strong>of</strong> 97% using the vsearch program (v2.11.1) and abundance <strong>of</strong> OTUs were<br />

recovered using v-search. OTUs were mapped at 97% sequence identity to an optimized<br />

version <strong>of</strong> the Ribosomal Database Project (RDP) database. Taxonomy was assigned to all<br />

identified OTUs using usearch program (v11.0.667). Sequence <strong>of</strong> OTUs were aligned using<br />

mafft (v7.407) and phylogenetic tree <strong>of</strong> identified OTUs was generated using fasttree (v<br />

2.1.10).<br />

Results<br />

Rhizo-microbiome <strong>of</strong> well-watered and drought stressed plants <strong>of</strong>maize was analyzed by<br />

sequencing V3-V4 region <strong>of</strong> the 16S rRNA gene. Differential abundance <strong>of</strong> bacterial classes<br />

was observed between well watered and drought stressed plants. Alpha Proteobacteria,<br />

Actinobacteria, Bacilli, Beta Proteobacteria, Gamma Proteobacteria and Acidobacteria GP6<br />

were 19.53 %, 10.98 %, 16.67 %, 5.05 %, 4.52 % and 3.81 % respectively in water stressed<br />

plants. In case <strong>of</strong> well watered plants, the classes <strong>of</strong> Alpha Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria,<br />

Bacilli, Beta Proteobacteria, Gamma Proteobacteria and Acidobacteria GP6 were 8.34 %,<br />

6.99 %, 42.09 %, 4.48 %, 3.57 % and 2.07 % respectively.<br />

Differential abundance <strong>of</strong> different classes <strong>of</strong> bacteria in (a) water stressed (b) well watered maize plants<br />

Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming,<br />

INM, soil-microorganisms-plant interactions<br />

449 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Conclusion<br />

Soil moisture stress altered the relative abundance <strong>of</strong> root associated bacteria <strong>of</strong> maize. There<br />

was an increase in the abundance <strong>of</strong> Alpha Proteobacteria and Actinobacteria under water<br />

stressed conditions as compared to well watered conditions.<br />

References<br />

Chaudhari, D., Rangappa, K., Das, A., Layek, J., Basavaraj, S., Kandpal, B.K., Shouche, Y.,<br />

Rahi, P. 2020. Pea (Pisum sativumL.) Plant shapes its rhizosphere microbiome for<br />

nutrient uptake and stress amelioration in acidic soils <strong>of</strong> the North-East Region <strong>of</strong><br />

India. Front.Microbio. 11:968.<br />

Rascovan, N., Carbonetto, B., Perrig, D., DoÂaz, M., Canciani, W., Abalo, M. 2016.<br />

Integrated analysis <strong>of</strong> root microbiomes <strong>of</strong> soybean and wheat from agricultural<br />

fields. Sci. Rep. 6: 280-84.<br />

Rout, M.E. 2014. The plant microbiome. Adv. Botan. Res. 69: 279–309.<br />

Santos-Medellín, C., Edwards, J., Liechty, Z., Nguyen, B. and Sundaresan, V. 2017. Drought<br />

stress results in a compartment-specific restructuring <strong>of</strong> the rice root-associated<br />

microbiomes. mBio. 8: e00764-17.<br />

T4-07R-1066<br />

Long Term Integrated Plant Nutrient Supply and in-situ Crop Residues<br />

Management Practices on Plant Nutrient Uptake and Soil Microbial<br />

Population Assessment in Rainfed Cotton under Vertisols<br />

V. Sanjivkumar 1 *, K. Baskar 1 , S. Manoharan 1 , M. Manikandan 1 , G. Guru 1 and<br />

G. Ravindrachary 2<br />

1 ICAR-AICRP on Dryland Agriculture, Agricultural Research Station, Kovilpatti, Tamil Nadu -<br />

628501.<br />

2<br />

ICAR-All India Co-ordinated Research Project on Dryland Agriculture, CRIDA, Hyderabad,<br />

Telungana state.<br />

* sanjivkumar.v@tnau.ac.in<br />

Cotton is one <strong>of</strong> the important cash crops and plays vital role in the economy <strong>of</strong> the country.<br />

India ranks second in world in area and production <strong>of</strong> cotton. The major production<br />

constraints <strong>of</strong> Vertisols are poor physical properties like low bulk density and hydraulic<br />

conductivity, formation <strong>of</strong> wide and deep cracks and narrow range <strong>of</strong> moisture for field<br />

operation. Now a days, the fertilizer requirements are increasing due to adoption <strong>of</strong> new high<br />

yielding hybrids in intensive cultivation. Therefore, to maintain crop productivity, the use <strong>of</strong><br />

450 | Page Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming, INM,<br />

soil-microorganisms-plant interactions


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

chemical fertilizers in balanced quantity is important. But looking into continuous increasing<br />

prices <strong>of</strong> fertilizers, it becomes necessary to minimize the expenses on fertilizers by using<br />

alternative sources like farmyard manure, crop residues, green manuring for sustaining the<br />

crop yields and soil fertility. The long-term integrated application <strong>of</strong> chemical fertilizers with<br />

organic manures improves soil physical and biological properties, soil fertility and crop<br />

yields.<br />

Methodology<br />

This research work was initiated during the year 2011-12. Every year rabi season, cotton (KC<br />

3) sowing has been taken in black soil farm (Vertisols) at the last week <strong>of</strong> September to find<br />

out the long-term effect <strong>of</strong> nutrient and combined effect <strong>of</strong> organic and inorganic nutrients on<br />

crop yield and soil fertility. The Kovilpatti region is the representative <strong>of</strong> dryland agriculture<br />

in Tamil Nadu. The depth <strong>of</strong> the black soil varies from 110 to 150 cm with the infiltration<br />

rate <strong>of</strong> 0.9cm hr -1 . Soil develops typical cracks with at least one cm wide and reaching a<br />

depth <strong>of</strong> 50cm or more in the period <strong>of</strong> moisture stress. Considering the mechanical fraction,<br />

the soil is clay ley with clay content <strong>of</strong> 46.4 to 61.2 per cent, 10.0 to 17.5 per cent silt and<br />

12.6 to 24.5 per cent coarse sand. The soil bulk density varies from 1.21 to 1.36 kg m -3 with<br />

the field capacity <strong>of</strong> 35 per cent and permanent wilting point <strong>of</strong> 14 per cent (Sunflower as an<br />

indicator plant). The soil has sub angular blocky structure with pH generally neutral to a<br />

tendency towards alkalinity at lower depths (7.8 to 8.2). The experiment was conducted in<br />

randomized block design (RBD) replicated thrice under rainfed condition. The treatments<br />

comprised <strong>of</strong> T1 - Control, T2 - 100 % RDF (40:20:40 NPK kg ha -1 ), T3- 50 % RDF (20:10:20<br />

NPK kg ha -1 ), T 4- 50 % N (crop residues), T 5 -50 % N (FYM), T 6 - 50 % inorganic N+ 50%<br />

organic N (crop residues) + P (50%) + K (50%), T7 -50 % Inorganic N+ 50% organic N<br />

(FYM) + P (50%) + K (50%), T 8 -100 % RDF + 25 kg ZnSO 4 ha -1 and T 9 - FYM @ 12.5 ha -<br />

1<br />

. As per the treatment schedule, the full dose <strong>of</strong> inorganic fertilizers and organic manures<br />

were applied as basal application. The initial soil status was <strong>of</strong> pH 8.13, EC 0.28 (dS m -1 ),<br />

and available NPK was 105, 11.2.and 345 kg/ha respectively<br />

Results<br />

In rainfed vertisols condition, long term application <strong>of</strong> 100 % RDF + 25 kg ZnSO4 ha -1<br />

recorded higher total plant nutrient uptake viz., nitrogen uptake (15.6 kg ha -1 ), phosphorus<br />

uptake (3.2 kg ha -1 ), potassium uptake (17.1 kg ha -1 ) and zinc uptake (18.20 mg kg -1 ) and it<br />

was followed by the treatments applied with 50 % Inorganic N+ 50% organic N (FYM) + P<br />

(50%) + K (50%) (Fig.1). Deshmukh et.al (2016) reported that the significantly higher uptake<br />

<strong>of</strong> nitrogen (40.30 kg ha 1), phosphorus, potassium (39.30kg ha-1), sulphur and zinc was<br />

recorded with the application <strong>of</strong> 125 % RDF (75:37.5:37.5 NPK kg ha -1 ) + Zinc @ 2.5 kg ha -1<br />

Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming,<br />

INM, soil-microorganisms-plant interactions<br />

451 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

over all other treatments. These results are conformity with the results obtained by<br />

Devrajet.al. (2011).<br />

Effect <strong>of</strong> integrated plant nutrient supply and insitu crop residue application on total plant nutrient<br />

uptake <strong>of</strong> cotton (KC 3) in Vertisols.<br />

Application <strong>of</strong> FYM @ 12.5 ha -1 under semi arid region <strong>of</strong> Kovilpatti deep black soils,<br />

registered higher microbial population viz., bacteria (8.6×10 6 CFU g -1 <strong>of</strong> soil), fungi<br />

(12.0×10 4 ) & actinomycetes (572.0×10 2 ) in rainfed cotton and it was followed by the<br />

treatment applied with 50 % N (FYM) alone.<br />

The lowest value was recorded in the untreated control plot. Similar study was reported by<br />

Patel et al., (2018).<br />

Conclusion<br />

In integrated nutrient management practices, the treatment applied over the long term,<br />

application <strong>of</strong> 100 % RDF + 25 kg ZnSO4 ha -1 registered higher total plant nutrient uptake<br />

viz., nitrogen, phosphorus and, potassium uptake. In case <strong>of</strong> microbial population viz.,<br />

bacteria, fungi and actinomycetes found superior with the application <strong>of</strong> FYM@12.5t/ha<br />

under semiarid rainfed condition in cotton crop and suitable for the Southern zone vertisols<br />

tract <strong>of</strong> Tamil Nadu.<br />

References<br />

Devraj, M.S., Bhattoo, B. S., Duhan. Promilla Kumara. and Jain, P.P. 2011. Effect <strong>of</strong> crop geometry<br />

and fertilizer levels on seed cotton yield and nutrient uptake <strong>of</strong> Bt. Cotton under irrigated<br />

conditions. J. Cotton Res. Dev., 25 (2):176-180.<br />

Deshmukh, P. W., Ingle, V. D., Paslawar, A. N., Bhoyar, S.M., Nandapure, S.P. and Deotalu, A.S.<br />

2016. Effect <strong>of</strong> moisture conservation techniques and fertilizer management on yield and<br />

uptake <strong>of</strong> cotton under high density planting system. Int. J. Agric Sci. Res., 6(3): 365-370.<br />

452 | Page Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming, INM,<br />

soil-microorganisms-plant interactions


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Patel, G., Dwivedi, B.S., Dwivedi, A.K., Thakur, R. and Singh, M. 2018. Long-term effect <strong>of</strong> nutrient<br />

management on soil biochemical properties in a Vertisol under soybean–wheat cropping<br />

sequence. J. Indian. Soc. Soil Sci., 66, 215- 221.<br />

T4-08R-1099<br />

On-farm Assessment <strong>of</strong> Site-Specific Nutrient Management in Rainfed<br />

areas <strong>of</strong> Telangana<br />

Kasthuri Rajamani 1 , P. Surendra Babu 2 , A. Madhavi 2 , T. Srijaya 2 and M. Goverdan 1<br />

1<br />

Regional Agricultural Research Station, PJTSAU, Palem-509217, Telangana, India<br />

2<br />

Agricultural Research Institute, Rajendranagr, PJTSAU, Hyderabad-501030, Telangana,<br />

India.<br />

Recent research (Chivengeet al., 2022) has demonstrated limitations <strong>of</strong> the blanket fertilizer<br />

recommendations practiced across Asia. On-farm research has clearly demonstrated the<br />

existence <strong>of</strong> large field variability in soil nutrient supply, nutrient use efficiency and crop<br />

responses. Thus, it was hypothesized that future gains in productivity and input use efficiency<br />

will require soil and crop management technologies that are knowledge-intensive and are<br />

tailored to specific characteristics <strong>of</strong> individual farms or fields to manage the variability<br />

among and within fields (Singhet al.,2022).Keeping this in view, the present study examines<br />

the extent <strong>of</strong> nutritional constraints and the scope <strong>of</strong> Site Specific Nutrient Management<br />

(SSNM) approach on productivity enhancement and livelihood improvement in dry land<br />

areas <strong>of</strong> Telangana.<br />

Methodology<br />

A total <strong>of</strong> ten on-farm trials were conducted with different test cropsviz., rice, maize, ragi,<br />

groundnut, sesamum, green-gram, black-gram, sorghum, bajra and castor in<br />

Nagarkurnooldistrictduring rabi season to evaluatesite specific nutrient management (SSNM)<br />

with target yield approach, blanket application <strong>of</strong> recommended fertilizers, soil test crop<br />

response (STCR) equation and farmers practice. After conducting farmers’ meeting in each<br />

village, and depending upon soil type, crop, slope and management practices, farmers’ fields<br />

were selected using stratified random methodology for demonstration <strong>of</strong> soil sampling<br />

procedure in one hectare. Further, crops were grown on selected farmers’ fieldswith known<br />

fertility statusby using SSNM based nutrient application with yield targetfertilizer<br />

prescription equations.The balanced nutrition included a recommended dose <strong>of</strong> fertilizer<br />

nutrients as N:P 2O 5:K 2O (kg acre -1 ) <strong>of</strong> 60:24:16 for rice, 25:14:8 for ragi, 96:32:32 for maize,<br />

8:16:19for groundnut, 24:8:8 for sesamum, 18:23:10 for green gram and black gram,<br />

36:16:16 for bajra, 40:24:16 for jonna and 32:16:12 for castor.Farmer’s practice in each trial<br />

was documented, which included suboptimal doses <strong>of</strong> N and P. Besides other crop<br />

Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming,<br />

INM, soil-microorganisms-plant interactions<br />

453 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

management practices like weeding and pest and disease control measures were followed,<br />

andthe data on crop yield was analyzed considering farmers as replications using one way<br />

ANOVA with randomized blocks on Bluestat.<br />

Results<br />

The soils are slightly acidic to strongly alkaline (pH 6.04 to 8.68) in reaction, whereas the<br />

electrical conductivity (EC) <strong>of</strong> selected villages <strong>of</strong> Southern Telangana Zone remains within<br />

safe limit with no salinity hazard (200 kg available nitrogen ha -1 . The available phosphorus (P 2O 5) ranged from 28.11 to<br />

89.03kg ha -1 with a mean value <strong>of</strong> 55.56 kg ha -1 , which indicating medium to high<br />

availability <strong>of</strong> phosphorus at farmers field. Important rabi crops (rice, maize, ragi, groundnut,<br />

sesamum, green-gram, black-gram, jonna, bajra and castor) <strong>of</strong> Nagarkurnooldistrict showed<br />

significant response to SSNM compared to blanket application <strong>of</strong> recommended fertilizers,<br />

soil test crop response (STCR) equation and farmers practice in all the locations. The seed<br />

yield (q acre -1 ) increased in all crops tested though by different levels. Target yield based site<br />

specific nutrient management approach registered highest yields (q acre -1 ) viz.,21.83in rice,<br />

31.66inragi, 35.09inmaize, 12.06in groundnut, 2.31in seamum, 3.57ingreengram,<br />

5.35inblackgram, 6.39in bajra, 17.24in sorghum and 20.83in castor.Further, the results<br />

revealed that the percent yield increased as 35.67 in rice, 28.80 in ragi, 34.24 in maize, 33.70<br />

in groundnut, 27.62 in sesamum, 23.14 in green gram, 21.32 in black gram, 23.60 in bajra,<br />

26.76 in jonna, 29.54 in castor cropsover farmers practice due to more precise application <strong>of</strong><br />

fertilizers in the study area.<br />

Initial soil values and yields <strong>of</strong> different crops<br />

Treatment<br />

pH<br />

EC<br />

(dSm -1 )<br />

OC (%) Ava. N (kg ha -1 ) Ava. P2O5 (kg ha -1 ) Ava. K2O (kg ha -1 )<br />

Yield<br />

(q acre -1 )<br />

Rice in Naganool<br />

FP 8.40 0.31 0.48 125.09 42.17 594.05 16.09<br />

RDF 8.16 0.36 0.42 150.18 51.54 654.53 18.31<br />

STCR 8.28 0.41 0.36 150.53 65.60 676.03 20.06<br />

SSNM-4 8.31 0.30 0.48 112.90 46.86 611.52 21.83<br />

Ragi in Kummera<br />

FP 6.04 0.11 0.42 117.81 51.54 600.77 24.58<br />

RDF 6.61 0.10 0.35 112.54 60.91 571.20 29.02<br />

STCR 6.84 0.15 0.39 87.81 56.23 555.07 30.11<br />

SSNM-4 8.20 0.23 0.42 112.90 46.86 576.58 31.66<br />

%<br />

Increase<br />

35.67<br />

28.80<br />

Maize in Palem<br />

FP 8.62 0.26 0.42 188.16 60.91 691.58 26.14<br />

454 | Page Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming, INM,<br />

soil-microorganisms-plant interactions


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

RDF 8.58 0.24 0.30 100.35 51.54 626.30 30.43<br />

STCR 8.68 0.30 0.45 188.16 51.54 659.90 33.32<br />

SSNM-4 8.49 0.24 0.36 100.35 42.17 657.22 35.09<br />

Groundnut in Kummera<br />

FP 8.54 0.25 0.36 100.35 60.91 573.89 9.02<br />

RDF 8.59 0.19 0.39 171.79 51.54 696.19 10.14<br />

STCR 8.41 0.24 0.48 125.44 60.91 614.21 11.13<br />

SSNM-4 8.54 0.26 0.42 175.62 51.54 571.20 12.06<br />

Sesamum in Kummera<br />

FP 8.30 0.39 0.39 193.79 65.60 637.82 1.81<br />

RDF 8.28 0.42 0.36 150.53 46.86 654.53 2.04<br />

STCR 8.22 0.21 0.42 107.81 56.23 620.93 2.10<br />

SSNM-4 8.38 0.38 0.42 137.98 74.97 649.15 2.31<br />

Green gram in Tummalasuru<br />

FP 8.02 0.13 0.27 102.72 56.23 628.99 2.90<br />

RDF 8.28 0.12 0.36 150.53 37.49 631.68 3.12<br />

STCR 8.05 0.14 0.42 137.98 74.97 511.78 3.29<br />

SSNM-2 7.72 0.13 0.39 137.98 28.11 676.54 3.57<br />

Black gramTummenapet Stage<br />

FP 7.96 0.28 0.30 112.90 89.03 513.66 4.41<br />

RDF 8.22 0.24 0.27 125.44 42.17 629.94 4.83<br />

STCR 7.93 0.20 0.39 105.26 28.11 619.58 5.02<br />

SSNM-4 8.17 0.20 0.27 190.70 28.11 478.18 5.35<br />

Bajra in Lingasanipalle<br />

FP 7.62 0.13 0.36 112.90 37.49 658.56 5.17<br />

RDF 8.23 0.15 0.42 125.09 70.29 529.79 5.82<br />

STCR 8.20 0.12 0.36 112.90 74.97 598.08 6.01<br />

SSNM-4 7.78 0.07 0.30 100.35 74.97 638.62 6.39<br />

Sorghum in Itholu<br />

FP 8.22 0.24 0.30 125.44 79.66 531.94 13.60<br />

RDF 7.37 0.09 0.43 125.09 89.03 693.50 15.12<br />

STCR 7.59 0.07 0.36 150.18 37.49 569.86 16.78<br />

SSNM-4 7.66 0.21 0.36 112.72 70.29 662.59 17.24<br />

Castor in Itholu<br />

FP 7.93 0.21 0.31 121.96 53.80 517.06 16.08<br />

RDF 8.13 0.15 0.40 135.14 39.85 487.49 18.61<br />

STCR 7.62 0.12 0.37 112.64 63.71 471.36 19.57<br />

SSNM-4 8.27 0.23 0.39 183.04 37.46 492.87 20.83<br />

References<br />

33.70<br />

27.62<br />

23.14<br />

21.32<br />

23.60<br />

26.76<br />

29.54<br />

Chivenge, P., Zingore, S., Ezui, K. S., Njoroge, S., Bunquin, M. A., Dobermann, A. and Saito, K.<br />

2022. Progress in research on site-specific nutrient management for smallholder farmers in<br />

sub-Saharan Africa. Field Crops Res., 281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2022.108503.<br />

Singh, S. P., Dutta, S., Jha, S., Prasad, S.S., Chaudhary, S.K., Manna, M.C., Majumdar, K.,<br />

Srivastava, P., Brahmanand, P. S., Singh, K. M. et al.,2022. Indigenous Nutrient Supplying<br />

Capacity <strong>of</strong> Young Alluvial Calcareous Soils Favours the Sustainable Productivity <strong>of</strong> Hybrid<br />

Rice and Maize Crops. Sustainability, 14, 11585. https://doi.org/ 10.3390/su141811585.<br />

Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming,<br />

INM, soil-microorganisms-plant interactions<br />

455 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

T4-09R-1437<br />

Integrated Nutrient Management Approach in Soybean (Glycine max L.,<br />

Merrill) Grown in Vertisols under Rainfed Condition <strong>of</strong> Malwa Plateau,<br />

Madhya Pradesh<br />

Bharat Singh*, K. S. Bangar, S. K. Choudhary, D. V. Bhagat, M. L. Jadav,<br />

A. Upadhyay, S. C. Tiwari, O. P. Girothia and Ramkumar Meena<br />

All India Coordinated Research Project for Dryland Agriculture,<br />

RVSKVV, College <strong>of</strong> Agriculture, Indore 452 001 Madhya Pradesh<br />

* singhbharat05@gmail.com<br />

Sustainable agriculture involves successful management <strong>of</strong> resources for increased<br />

agricultural production to satisfy changing human needs and maintaining soil and natural<br />

resources. Integrated nutrient management practices are one <strong>of</strong> the approaches for sustainable<br />

agriculture production. It involves combined application <strong>of</strong> chemical fertilizers along with<br />

organic manures, green manures, bi<strong>of</strong>ertilizers and other organic recyclable materials for crop<br />

production. Integrated nutrient management encourages the use <strong>of</strong> in-house organics waste;<br />

thus it saves on the cost <strong>of</strong> fertilizers for crop production and enhancing nutrient use<br />

efficiency (Thakur et al., 2011). A field experiment was conducted at All India Coordinated<br />

Research Project for Dryland Agriculture, RVSKVV, College <strong>of</strong> Agriculture, Indore during<br />

kharif <strong>of</strong> two consecutive years (2015 and 2016) on soybean (JS 95-60). Nine treatments<br />

were tested viz. T 1- Control, T 2- 100% NPK , T 3-100% NPK + Zn (20 kgha -1 ) , T 4-100%<br />

NPK + Zn (20 kgha -1 ) + S (10 kgha -1 ), T5-100% NPK + S (10 kgha -1 ) , T6-10 tha -1 FYM +<br />

50% NPK, , T 7-10 tha -1 FYM + (Rhizobium + PSB) + 50% NPK, T 8-10 tha -1 FYM +<br />

(Rhizobium + PSB) + 50% NPK + Zn + S and T9-10 tha -1 FYM + (Rhizobium + PSB) + 50%<br />

NPK + 5 tha -1 Residues + Zn + S. Based on average <strong>of</strong> two years data indicate that the<br />

highest grain yield <strong>of</strong> soybean (1156 kgha -1 ) was recorded in the treatment T 9-10 tha -1<br />

FYM+(Rhizobium+PSB)+50% NPK+5tha -1 residues+Zn+S, gross return (Rs. 46240ha -1 ) and<br />

B: C ratio (2.48) followed by T 8-10 tha -1 FYM+(Rhizobium+PSB) +50% NPK+Zn+S (1082<br />

kgha -1 ), T7: 10 t FYM+(Rhizobium +PSB)+ 50% NPK (1068 kgha -1 ); T6: 10 t FYM+50%<br />

NPK (1030 kgha -1 ), T4: 100% NPK+Zn + S (996 kg/ ha), T5: 100% NPK+S 10 kgha -1 (957<br />

kgha -1 ) and T 2: 100% NPK (923 kgha -1 ). The lowest grain yield <strong>of</strong> soybean was obtained in<br />

control treatment T1 - 731 kgha -1 which was significantly inferior to all treatments under<br />

study.<br />

456 | Page Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming, INM,<br />

soil-microorganisms-plant interactions


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Reference<br />

Thakur, R., Sawarkar, S.D., Vaishya, U.K. and Singh, M. 2011. Impact <strong>of</strong> continuous use <strong>of</strong><br />

inorganic fertilizers and organic manures on soil properties and productivity under<br />

soybean-wheat intensive cropping <strong>of</strong> a Vertisol. J. Indian Soc. Soil Sci., 59:74-79.<br />

T4-10R-1484<br />

Vertical Distribution <strong>of</strong> Different Pools <strong>of</strong> Soil Organic Carbon under Long<br />

Term Finger Millet Monocropping on Alfisols in Semi-Arid Tropical India<br />

B. G. Vasanthi, Mudalagiriyappa, M.C. Harish, K.M.Puneetha and K.Devaraja<br />

All India Co-ordinated research Project for Dryland Agriculture, UAS, GKVK,<br />

Bengaluru-560 065, Karnataka<br />

Due to intensive cultivation combined with lack <strong>of</strong> organic material inputs, have experienced<br />

increased degradation over the past several decades, especially evident in decline <strong>of</strong> soil<br />

organic carbon (SOC). Even though the mineral fertilizer recommendations are inadequate<br />

annual application <strong>of</strong> FYM along with NPK fertilizer sustains yield and soil productivity<br />

(Bhattacharyya et al., 2008). SOC levels at a point <strong>of</strong> time reflect the long-term balance<br />

between additions <strong>of</strong> organic carbon from different sources and its losses through different<br />

pathways. It influences most <strong>of</strong> the soil properties thereby affecting crop productivity. The<br />

combination <strong>of</strong> organic and inorganic fertilization enhanced the accumulation <strong>of</strong> SOC which<br />

is consistent with other studies. In contrast application <strong>of</strong> inorganic fertilizers has <strong>of</strong>ten<br />

produced contradictory effect on SOC concentrations and or its fractions enhancement (Ram<br />

and Singh, 2016). Despite these apparent benefits in soil properties, higher rate <strong>of</strong> manure<br />

application are likely contributing little to soil C stabilization. Conserving concentration <strong>of</strong><br />

soil organic matter above the threshold level is an important factor for increasing soil quality.<br />

Therefore, the integrated use <strong>of</strong> organic manure and inorganic fertilizers is widely recognized<br />

strategy for sustaining productivity and improving soil quality.<br />

In most case studies for SOC and SOC fractions have mostly focused on shallow surface<br />

limited information on soil pr<strong>of</strong>ile SOC and its fractions distribution is hindrance to<br />

conclusive identification <strong>of</strong> beneficial effects after long term fertilizer application. Therefore,<br />

the present investigation was to study organic carbon fractions like total organic carbon,<br />

permanganate oxidizable carbon, very liable carbon, liable carbon, less liable carbon at all<br />

four depths (0-15, 15-30, 30-45 and 45-60 cm) on Alfisols influenced by long term fertilizer<br />

application. Therefore, the outcome <strong>of</strong> the research would help to understand the assimilation<br />

pattern <strong>of</strong> carbon fractions under different fertilizer treatments through inorganically or in<br />

combination with manure.<br />

Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming,<br />

INM, soil-microorganisms-plant interactions<br />

457 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Methodology<br />

A long-term field experiment under finger millet (EleusinecoracanaL.) monocropping was<br />

established in 1978, at the All IndiaCoordinated Research Project for Dryland Agriculture,<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Agricultural Sciences, Bangalore, India. Theexperimental site is situated at<br />

latitude <strong>of</strong> 13°050 13.0″ north, longitude <strong>of</strong> 77°390 22.1″ east and an altitude <strong>of</strong> 929 mabove<br />

mean sea level, in the eastern dry zone <strong>of</strong> Karnataka.Soils in the experimental field belong to<br />

Vijaypura soilseries typical <strong>of</strong> the Alfisol order. The soils are typicallateritic and classified as<br />

fine, kaolinitic, isohyperthermic, TypicKandiustalf as per USDA classification with<br />

claycontent increasing with soil depth. These soils are yellowishred, lateritic and are derived<br />

from granite gneiss undersubtropical semi-arid climate. They are very deep,<br />

welldrainedsandy loam to sandy clay loam with clay contentincrease in depth and occur in<br />

nearly level to gently slopingareas.<br />

The experiment consisted <strong>of</strong> finger millet, monocropping, arranged in a randomized<br />

blockdesign with two replications and five treatments [T1: control(no fertilizer and no<br />

farmyard manure (FYM) applied), T2:FYM 10 t/ha, T3: FYM 10 t/ha + 50% NPK, T4: FYM<br />

at10 t/ha + 100% NPK and T5: 100% recommended NPK].The 100% recommended NPK<br />

application for finger milletwas 50 kg N, P and K per hectare as per thepackage <strong>of</strong> practices<br />

recommended by the University <strong>of</strong>Agricultural Sciences, Bangalore, based on largescaleexperimentation.<br />

The FYM was prepared using cow dungcollected from a unit<br />

maintained in the university, whereinthe bedding material was millet straw and the<br />

nutrientcontent was analyzed in the laboratory on fresh weight basis. The average<br />

composition <strong>of</strong> FYM consisted <strong>of</strong> 0.54, 0.35and 0.63% N, P and K, respectively. Soon after<br />

the rainfallin June, the land was ploughed to an average depth <strong>of</strong>15–20 cm, using a bullockdrawn<br />

country plough. After theinitial ploughing, FYM was applied according to<br />

treatmentand incorporated by harrow. The fertilizer N was applied as urea, while fertilizer P<br />

wasapplied as di-ammonium phosphate (DAP) and potassium asmuriate <strong>of</strong> potash (MOP).<br />

The experiment was conducted ona net plot size <strong>of</strong> 2.7 m 9 11.0 m with row 9 plant spacing<strong>of</strong><br />

30 cm 9 10 cm. Finger millet (GPU-28) monocropping involved finger millet in allyears. Soil<br />

samples were collected from each plot at a soil depth <strong>of</strong>0–15 cm after harvest <strong>of</strong> the crop.<br />

Statistical analysis<br />

The data were analysed using randomized blockdesign (RBD). Statistical analysis was<br />

performed byWindows based SPSS programme (ver. 10.0, SPSS Inc., 1996). The SPSS<br />

procedure was used foranalysis <strong>of</strong> variance (ANOVA) to determine thestatistical significance<br />

<strong>of</strong> treatments effect. Simple correlation coefficients andregression equations were also<br />

developed to evaluaterelationships between the response variables using thesame statistical<br />

package. The 5% probability level isregarded as statistically significant.<br />

458 | Page Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming, INM,<br />

soil-microorganisms-plant interactions


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Results<br />

Total organic carbon (TOC)<br />

The TOC concentration in soil layers varied depth-wise (Table 1). During 2020, the highest<br />

concentration <strong>of</strong> TOC was observed in 0–15 cm depth and exponentially decreased with<br />

increase in depth after each crop harvest. Depth 0–15 cm <strong>of</strong> 100% NPK+ FYM plots<br />

witnessed 146.36 % increased concentration <strong>of</strong> TOC at the harvest. The application <strong>of</strong> FYM<br />

during the years confined to build soil organic carbon on surface layers only. Cultivation only<br />

with balanced fertilization (NPK) and C supplementation (NPK+FYM) maintained or<br />

increased the TOC content while no fertilization treatments decreased it (Majumderet al.,<br />

2007). Despite, fertilizer treatment 100% NPK and FYM balanced the C: N ratio and energy<br />

for soil biota which helped in augmenting the TOC <strong>of</strong> the soil. Manjaiah and Singh (2001)<br />

also reported an annual estimated organic carbon input to the tunes <strong>of</strong> 8190 and 2780 kg ha −1<br />

in 100% NPK + FYM and 100% NPK treatments, respectively.<br />

Permanganaseoxidisable carbon (POXC)<br />

The POXC concentration in soil layers varied depth-wise. During 2020, the highest<br />

concentration <strong>of</strong> POXC was observed in 0–15 cm depth and exponentially decreased with<br />

increase in depth after each crop harvest. Depth 0–15 cm <strong>of</strong> 100% NPK+ FYM plots<br />

witnessed 23.21 %, increased concentration <strong>of</strong> POXC at the harvest. The application <strong>of</strong> FYM<br />

during the years confined to build soil organic carbon on surface layers only.<br />

Significantly higher libale carbon fraction <strong>of</strong> Very liable carbon, liable carbon and less liable<br />

carbon were observed in 100% NPK+ FYM (Table 2) in top layer <strong>of</strong> 0-15 cm which is <strong>of</strong><br />

39.23% , 177.78% and 40.78% higher than control, respectively. Within the labile carbon<br />

fractions higher value <strong>of</strong> very liable carbon fraction was found as compared to other two.<br />

The KMnO4 extractable C, which is considered as a labile C fraction <strong>of</strong> soil. The surface soil<br />

acquired more KMnO4 extractable C than sub-surface soil after harvests. Treatment 100%<br />

NPK + FYM showed significantly higher KMnO 4 extractable C over allother treatments at all<br />

depths after the harvest <strong>of</strong> both crops. Thebalanced applications <strong>of</strong> N, P and K (100% NPK)<br />

showed higher KMnO 4-C than that <strong>of</strong> control and unbalanced treatment. This indicatedthat<br />

the added FYM contributed to the KMnO 4 oxidized labile C fraction in soil which is<br />

composed <strong>of</strong>amino acids, simple carbohydrates, a portion <strong>of</strong> microbial biomass and other<br />

simple organic compounds (Zouet al., 2005). Also, the application <strong>of</strong> nitrogen ascribed the<br />

priming effect <strong>of</strong> applied N on freshorganic matter in soil which stimulated microbial action<br />

in decomposition <strong>of</strong> organic matter.<br />

Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming,<br />

INM, soil-microorganisms-plant interactions<br />

459 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Conclusion<br />

The highest and significant increase in passive pools humic and fulvic carbon was observed<br />

under combined application <strong>of</strong> FYM 10 t kg -1 + 100 % recommended NPK. Similarly, there<br />

was significant carbon build up and stabilization in this nutrient compared to all other<br />

practices. Highest concentration <strong>of</strong> soil organic carbon was observed in surface soil and<br />

exponentially decreased with increase in depth after each crop harvest. Hence application <strong>of</strong><br />

FYM along with NPK resulted in a significant positive buildup <strong>of</strong> all pools in the treatment at<br />

all four depths. Therefore, balance fertilization is panaceally important for sustaining<br />

improved soil health with balanced organic status and production potentiality <strong>of</strong> soil for<br />

finger millet monocropping.<br />

References<br />

Bhattacharjya, S., Bhaduri, D., Chauhan, S., Chandra, R., Raverkar, K.P. and Pareek, N.<br />

2017. [Comparative evaluation <strong>of</strong> three contrasting land use systems for soil carbon,<br />

microbial and biochemical indicators in North-Western Himalaya], Ecol. Eng.,<br />

103:21–30<br />

Majumder, B., Mandal, B., Bandyopadhyay, P.K. and Chaudhury, J. 2007. Soil organic<br />

carbon pools and productivity relationships for a 34 year old rice–wheat–jute agro<br />

ecosystems under different fertilizer treatments. Plant Soil, 297:53–67.<br />

Manjaiah, K. and Singh, D. 2001. Soil organic matter and biological properties after 26 years<br />

<strong>of</strong> maize–wheat–cowpea cropping as affected by manure and fertilization in Cambisol<br />

in semiarid region <strong>of</strong> India. Agri. Ecosyst. Environ., 86:155–62.<br />

Ram, S., Singh, V. and Sirari, P. 2016. Effects <strong>of</strong> 41 years <strong>of</strong> application <strong>of</strong> inorganic<br />

fertilizers and farm yard manure on crop yields, soil quality, and sustainable yield<br />

index under a rice-wheat cropping system on Mollisols <strong>of</strong> North India. Commun. Soil<br />

Sci. Plant Anal., 47 (2):179–93.<br />

Zou, X. M., Ruan, H. H., Fu, Y., Yang, X. D. and Sha, L.Q. 2005. Estimating soil labile<br />

organic carbon and potential turnover rates using a sequential fumigation-incubation<br />

procedure. Soil Biol. Biochem., 37:1923–28.<br />

460 | Page Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming, INM,<br />

soil-microorganisms-plant interactions


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-<br />

CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Effect <strong>of</strong> FYM and synthesised fertilizer application, on POXC and TOC under fingermilletmonocropping<br />

Treatment<br />

POXC<br />

0-15 cm 15-30 cm 30-45 cm 45-60 cm 0-15 cm 15-30 cm 30-45 cm 45-60 cm<br />

T 1: Control 0.42 0.35 0.35 0.29 4.40 4.19 3.48 2.25<br />

T 2: Only organic manure 0.52 0.42 0.36 0.25 6.85 3.89 4.60 3.58<br />

T 3: Organic manure+ 50% Rec. NPK 0.54 0.50 0.44 0.37 7.06 8.39 3.99 2.15<br />

T 4: Organic manure+ 100% Rec. NPK 0.59 0.54 0.53 0.40 10.84 7.57 4.19 4.50<br />

T 5: Only 100% Rec. NPK 0.45 0.41 0.41 0.35 5.62 3.68 3.99 3.48<br />

S.Em.± 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.08 0.07 0.01 0.03<br />

CD at 5 % 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.25 0.23 0.04 0.10<br />

POXC: Permanganaseoxidisable carbon, TOC: Total organic carbon<br />

TOC<br />

Effect <strong>of</strong> FYMand synthesised fertilizer application on oxidisable carbon fractions (very liable, liable and less liable carbon<br />

fraction) under fingermilletmonocropping<br />

Very liable carbon (g kg -1 ) Liable carbon (g kg -1 ) Less liable carbon (g kg -1 )<br />

Treatment<br />

15-30 30-45<br />

15-30 30-45 45-60 0-15 15-30 30-45 45-60<br />

0-15 cm<br />

45-60 cm 0-15 cm<br />

cm cm<br />

cm cm cm cm cm cm cm<br />

T 1: Control 1.30 1.13 1.01 0.89 0.45 0.40 0.38 0.26 1.03 0.77 0.69 0.22<br />

T 2: Only organic manure 1.45 1.16 1.01 0.74 1.14 0.68 0.43 0.04 1.14 0.83 0.61 0.58<br />

T 3: Organic manure+ 50% Rec. NPK 1.54 1.48 1.16 0.62 1.02 0.65 0.59 0.53 1.31 0.77 0.54 0.14<br />

T 4: Organic manure+ 100% Rec. NPK 1.81 1.36 0.95 0.56 1.25 0.32 0.24 0.09 1.45 1.00 0.36 0.31<br />

T 5: Only 100% Rec. NPK 1.45 1.04 0.92 0.53 0.45 0.19 0.16 0.12 0.46 0.31 0.20 0.07<br />

S.Em.± 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01<br />

CD at 5 % 0.02 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.04 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.04 0.03 0.02 0.02<br />

Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming, INM, soil-microorganisms-plant interactions<br />

461 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

T4-10aR-1624<br />

Conjoint Application <strong>of</strong> Nano-Urea and Conventional Fertilizers for<br />

Sustainable Crop Production<br />

Pravin Kumar Upadhyay*, V. K. Singh, B. S. Dwivedi, Abir Dey, G. A. Rajanna, Subhash<br />

Babu, Rajiv Kumar Singh, Sanjay Singh Rathore, Kapila Shekhawat, Meenakshi and<br />

Gaurav Shukla<br />

ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi- 110 012 (India)<br />

*pravin.ndu@gmail.com<br />

The nutrient supply needs to be synchronized with the crop demand to reduce nutrient losses and<br />

improve nutrient use efficiency. For this, several approaches have been adopted over the years,<br />

with varying success rates. Splitting <strong>of</strong> nutrient doses during the crop growth period, changing<br />

rate and method <strong>of</strong> application, soil test-based nutrient input, decision support systems,<br />

monitoring in-season crop N demand and real-time management, and novel fertilizer products<br />

are some <strong>of</strong> the technologies evaluated under field conditions. Whereas these studies advised<br />

several technology packages concerning the balanced use <strong>of</strong> plant nutrients in different crops and<br />

cropping systems, the R&D on fertilizer products could not receive desired attention.<br />

Nonetheless, researchers repeatedly underlined the necessity to give greater emphasis on the<br />

development and promotion <strong>of</strong> alternate novel fertilizers, besides improved agronomic<br />

management to enhance nutrient use efficiency to restore soil fertility and improve farm pr<strong>of</strong>it.<br />

Recently, we have evaluated one <strong>of</strong> the novel fertilizers developed by Indian Farmers Fertiliser<br />

Cooperative Limited i.e. nano-urea at ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi<br />

under maize-wheat and pearl millet-mustard cropping systems. The experiments were conducted<br />

with 8 treatments in a randomized complete block design (RCBD) with 3 replications.<br />

Treatments details <strong>of</strong> experiments undertaken<br />

S. No. Treatment Code Treatment details<br />

1 N0PK No N<br />

2 N50PK 50% <strong>of</strong> recommended N<br />

3 N75PK 75% <strong>of</strong> recommended N<br />

4 N100PK 100% <strong>of</strong> recommended N<br />

5 N0PK + Nano-N No N + 2 spray <strong>of</strong> Nano-N<br />

6 N50PK+ Nano-N 50% <strong>of</strong> recommended N + 2 sprays <strong>of</strong> Nano-N<br />

7 N75PK+ Nano-N 75% <strong>of</strong> recommended N + 2 sprays <strong>of</strong> Nano-N<br />

8 N100PK+ Nano-N 100% <strong>of</strong> recommended N + 2 sprays <strong>of</strong> Nano-N<br />

462 | Page Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming, INM, soilmicroorganisms-plant<br />

interactions


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

The recommended fertilizer doses were 150 kg N/ha, 75 kg P2O5/ha, and 75 kg K2O/ha for<br />

maize; 60 kg N/ha, 60 kg P2O5/ha, and 30 kg K2O /ha for pearl millet; 80 kg N/ha, 40 kg<br />

P2O5/ha, and 30 kg K2O /ha for mustard, and 120 kg N/ha, 60 kg P2O5/ha, and 60 kg K2O /ha for<br />

the wheat crop. Urea, single superphosphate, and muriate <strong>of</strong> potash were used to supply N, P,<br />

and K, respectively. In mustard and pearl millet, 50% <strong>of</strong> N (as per treatment) and 100% <strong>of</strong><br />

recommended P and K were applied as basal, and the remaining 50% N was top-dressed in one<br />

split. In wheat and maize, 50% <strong>of</strong> N (as per treatments) and 100% <strong>of</strong> P and K fertilizers were<br />

applied as basal, and the remaining N was top-dressed in two equal splits. Nano-urea was applied<br />

at 1250 ml/ha (per spray) as a foliar spray.<br />

Results<br />

Result revealed that yield <strong>of</strong> maize, wheat, mustard and pearl millet was significantly lower<br />

under N0PK + Nano-urea compared with N100PK and remained at par with N0PK. The plots<br />

under N50PK + Nano-urea received significantly lesser yield compared with N100PK. This<br />

indicates only application <strong>of</strong> nano-urea or nano-urea with N50PK could not suffice the<br />

requirement <strong>of</strong> the N in the crops and is not comparable with N100PK. On the other hand,<br />

application <strong>of</strong> N75PK + Nano-urea registered similar yields compared with recommended NPK<br />

applied plots, indicating towards a possibility <strong>of</strong> curtailing 25% <strong>of</strong> recommended N doses with<br />

two sprays <strong>of</strong> nano-urea. The soil mineral N were similar under the treatments N75PK + Nanourea<br />

and N100PK. On the other hand, curtailing <strong>of</strong> 50% or more in the recommended N doses<br />

leads to significant decrease in the mineral N in soil, irrespective <strong>of</strong> nano-urea application.<br />

T4-11P-1027<br />

Soil Organic Carbon Stock Changes in a Semi-Arid Alfisol under Heavy<br />

Carbon Loading<br />

K. Srinivas*, A. K. Indoria, S. S. Balloli, S. Suvana and K. Sammi Reddy<br />

ICAR-Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, Hyderabad, Telangana 500 059, India<br />

* k.srinivas1@icar.gov.in<br />

Small inputs <strong>of</strong> organic carbon or minor changes in management rarely, if at all, lead to<br />

measurable changes in soil organic carbon content or stock. A field study was carried out to<br />

investigate whether large additions <strong>of</strong> organic carbon would lead to measurable changes in soil<br />

organic carbon (SOC) stocks in an Alfisol under hot semi-arid climate, where soil organic carbon<br />

losses are high.<br />

Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming,<br />

INM, soil-microorganisms-plant interactions<br />

463 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Methodology<br />

The field experiment was conducted for four years during 2018-2021 at Hayathnagar research<br />

farm <strong>of</strong> ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad. Each year, for the four years, vermicompost (VC) and fresh<br />

gliricidia loppings (GL) were applied to soil at rates equivalent to 0, 2, 4 and 6 Mg C/ha<br />

(treatments) and incorporated thoroughly into the soil. Pigeonpea and castor were grown in<br />

rotation (pigeonpea in 2018 and 2020, castor in 2019 and 2021). Carbon input to soil by crops<br />

through litter was quantified. Carbon input through roots was estimated using shoot:root ratios<br />

(Srinivas et. al., 2017). Rhizodeposited C was estimated as 65% <strong>of</strong> root biomass (Bolinder et al.,<br />

2007). Total C input to soil was obtained by adding C inputs through treatments and crop C<br />

inputs. Soil bulk density and organic carbon from 0-20 cm and 20-40 cm depths were measured<br />

before the start <strong>of</strong> the experiment and at the end <strong>of</strong> 4 years, and soil organic carbon stocks were<br />

computed. Change in SOC stock up to 40 cm depth was computed as difference between stock<br />

after 4 years and initial stock<br />

Results<br />

Total carbon input by crops (4 years) ranged from 5.22 Mg/ha in control plots (no external C<br />

input) to 7.75 Mg/ha in plots that received 6 Mg C/ha every year through vermicompost taking<br />

the total C input in this treatment to 31.75 Mg/ha (24 Mg/ha through applied vermicompost and<br />

7.75 Mg/ha through crop). Soil organic carbon in the 0-20 cm depth, which was 3.14 g/kg before<br />

the start <strong>of</strong> the experiment, decreased slightly to 2.85 g/kg in control and increased to a<br />

maximum <strong>of</strong> 5.01 g/kg in the 6 Mg C/ha through vermicompost treatment. In the 20-40 cm<br />

depth, initial SOC <strong>of</strong> 2.44 g/kg decreased to 2.38 g/kg in control and increased to a maximum <strong>of</strong><br />

2.92 g/kg in the 6 Mg C/ha through vermicompost treatment. Changes in bulk density were small<br />

and statistically non-significant.The initial SOC stock up to 40 cm depth was 18.3 Mg/ha and it<br />

decreased by 0.53 Mg/ha in the control plots, while in the plots that received external C inputs,<br />

the carbon stocks increased. SOC stocks were significantly higher in the 0-20 cm depth over the<br />

20-40 cm depth. The highest C stock <strong>of</strong> 25.7 Mg/ha was recorded in plots that received 6 Mg<br />

C/ha through vermicompost. Increase in C stock as percentage <strong>of</strong> total C input (treatment C input<br />

+ crop C input) ranged from 15.8% in 4 Mg C/ha through gliricidialoppings to 23.4% in 6 Mg<br />

C/ha through vermicompost.<br />

464 | Page Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming, INM, soilmicroorganisms-plant<br />

interactions


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Total crop C input and soil organic carbon balance after harvest <strong>of</strong> 4 th crop (4 years <strong>of</strong> C<br />

inputs)<br />

Treatment<br />

Total<br />

crop C<br />

input<br />

0-20<br />

cm<br />

OC<br />

g/kg<br />

20-40<br />

cm<br />

BD<br />

Mg/m 3<br />

0-20<br />

cm<br />

20-40<br />

cm<br />

0-20<br />

cm<br />

C stock<br />

Mg/ha<br />

20-40<br />

cm<br />

0-40<br />

cm<br />

C stock<br />

(Final -<br />

Initial)<br />

C inputs<br />

Mg/ha<br />

Treatments Crop Total<br />

Stock<br />

change<br />

(% <strong>of</strong><br />

added)<br />

Control (No<br />

C)<br />

2 Mg C<br />

through VC<br />

4 Mg C<br />

through VC<br />

6 Mg C<br />

through VC<br />

2 Mg C<br />

through GL<br />

4 Mg C<br />

through GL<br />

6 Mg C<br />

through GL<br />

5.22 2.85 2.38 1.65 1.75 9.4 8.3 17.7 -0.53 0.0 5.22 5.22 --<br />

6.61 3.90 2.34 1.68 1.78 13.1 8.3 21.4 3.18 8.0 6.61 14.61 21.8<br />

7.28 4.31 2.36 1.69 1.75 14.5 8.2 22.8 4.53 16.0 7.28 23.28 19.5<br />

7.75 5.01 2.92 1.60 1.65 16.1 9.6 25.7 7.42 24.0 7.75 31.75 23.4<br />

6.56 3.67 2.35 1.72 1.73 12.6 8.2 20.8 2.53 8.0 6.56 14.56 17.3<br />

7.53 4.05 2.27 1.70 1.82 13.7 8.2 22.0 3.72 16.0 7.53 23.53 15.8<br />

7.11 4.55 2.45 1.67 1.77 15.2 8.7 23.9 5.65 24.0 7.11 31.11 18.2<br />

Initial - 3.14 2.44 1.62 1.66 10.2 8.1 18.3 - - - - -<br />

Conclusion<br />

Soil organic carbon stock increased with increase in C inputs. At the end <strong>of</strong> 4 years <strong>of</strong><br />

application <strong>of</strong> C inputs, a maximum retention <strong>of</strong> 23.4% <strong>of</strong> added C was observed with 6 Mg C/ha<br />

through vermicompost. The persistence <strong>of</strong> changes in SOC stocks after cessation <strong>of</strong> external C<br />

inputs needs to be investigated.<br />

References<br />

Bolinder, M.A., Janzen, H.H., Gregorich, E.G. Angers, D.A., Vanden-Bygaart, A.J., 2007. An<br />

approach for estimating net primary productivity and annual carbon inputs to soil for<br />

common agricultural crops in Canada. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ., 118 29–42.<br />

Srinivas, K., Maruthi, V., Ramana, D. B. V., Vimala, B., Nataraja, K. C., Sharma, K. L., Rao, M.<br />

S., Maheswari, M., Prabhakar, M., and Reddy, K. S., 2017. Roots <strong>of</strong> Rainfed Crops:<br />

Biomass, Composition and Carbon Mineralization. Research Bulletin 01/2017. ICAR-<br />

Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, Hyderabad, India. 68p.<br />

Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming,<br />

INM, soil-microorganisms-plant interactions<br />

465 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

T4-12P-1035<br />

Impact <strong>of</strong> Fertilizer Deep Placement on Yield and Nutrient Use Efficiency <strong>of</strong><br />

Direct Seeded Rice<br />

Jami Naveen 1* , K. Kurmi 2 , K. Pathak 2 , M. Saikia 2 , V. Kumar 3 , A. K. Srivastava 3 , S. Kundu 1 ,<br />

M. Sharmah 2 , K. Sai Teja 2 , A. Hazarika 2 and K. Sammi reddy 1<br />

1 ICAR- Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, Santhoshnagar, Hyderabad, Telangana, India<br />

2 Assam Agricultural university, Jorhat, Assam, India<br />

3<br />

International Rice Research Institute, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India<br />

*jaminaveen17@gmail.com<br />

Rice production needs to be increased by 1.2 to 1.5 per cent annually in order to meet the world's<br />

food needs (Dansoet al., 2021). To produce 1 kg <strong>of</strong> rice grain, 15–20 g <strong>of</strong> nitrogen (N) needs to be<br />

added. In Assam, rice is major staple food crop. It accounts for 2.54 million ha <strong>of</strong> the gross<br />

cropped area <strong>of</strong> 4.16 million ha and accounts for 96 per cent <strong>of</strong> the state's total food grain<br />

production (Anon 2021). In Assam, rice is grown in three distinct seasons: kharif or sali, boro, and<br />

ahu, in a variety <strong>of</strong> ecosystems including deep water, rain-fed, and irrigated conditions. Among<br />

these seasons, alirice is the most common because it receives the maximum amount <strong>of</strong> rainfall.<br />

Nitrogen availability is the major limiting factor in this season. A lerger part <strong>of</strong> the applied N<br />

fertilizer is losttrhoughvolatilization, denitrification, run-<strong>of</strong>f, leaching, and fixation (Gaihreet al.,<br />

2018). As a result, nitrogen use efficiencyis very low (30-35 percent) in rice cultivation. Fertilizer<br />

deep placement (FDP) <strong>of</strong> urea or multi-nutrient briquettes (N, P and K) is one <strong>of</strong> the best N<br />

management practices in lowland rice fields for achieving these multiple benefits. Deep placement<br />

<strong>of</strong> urea <strong>of</strong> larger size particle not only improves its use efficiency but also provides environmental<br />

benefits by reducing run<strong>of</strong>f and nitrogen volatilization losses. In the above backdrop, this study<br />

was conducted to find out the effect <strong>of</strong> fertilizer deep placement on N-use efficiency and<br />

performance <strong>of</strong> direct seeded rice.<br />

Methodology<br />

A field experiment was initiated in 2020 in the Instructional-Cum-Research (ICR) farm, Assam<br />

Agricultural University, in low land condition. The soil was sandy loam, acidic in reaction,<br />

medium in organic carbon and available N, low in available P2O5 and medium in available K2O. A<br />

long duration rice variety Ranjit-Sub1 was taken as test variety. The total amount <strong>of</strong> rainfall<br />

received during the crop growth period <strong>of</strong> first year was 1098.80 mm with a corresponding value<br />

<strong>of</strong> 650.80 mm in the second (2021) year. The experiment was laid out in a randomized block<br />

design, replicating three times with eight treatment combinations, viz., T1: Control (No Nitrogen),<br />

466 | Page Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming, INM, soilmicroorganisms-plant<br />

interactions


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

T2: Farmers’ practice (30-18.4-36 kg N-P2O5-K2O kg ha -1 ), T3:Recommended Dose <strong>of</strong> Fertilizer<br />

(RDF) @ 60-20-40 kg N-P2O5-K2O kg ha -1 with N in three splits @ 30-15-15 kg ha -1 at basal,<br />

active tillering (AT) and panicle initiation (PI), T4: Best management practices (BMP) as per IRRI:<br />

60-20-40 kg N-P2O5-K2O ha -1 with N in three equal splits at basal, AT and PI, T5: Fertilizer Deep<br />

Placement (FDP) with 120% N +100% PK <strong>of</strong> RDF, T6:FDP with100% NPK <strong>of</strong> RDF, T7:FDP with<br />

80% N +100% PK <strong>of</strong> RDF and T8: FDP with 60% N + 100% PK.<br />

Results<br />

Significantly higher number <strong>of</strong> panicles m -2 (317.52), total grins panicle -1 (217.72), filled grains<br />

panicle -1 (197.97), panicle length (27.90cm) and 1000-grain weight (20.15g) were observed<br />

under FDP with 120 percent N + 100 percent PK <strong>of</strong> RDF followed by FDP with 100% N +100%<br />

PK <strong>of</strong> RDF (298.02), (200.47), (178.48), (27.24cm) and (19.86 g) in both years.<br />

Significantlyhighest grain yield (49.33q ha -1 ), straw yield (65.20q ha -1 ) and harvest index (43.06<br />

per cent) were recorded in FDP with 120 percent N + 100 percent PK <strong>of</strong> RDF. The lowest values<br />

grain yield (19.70 q ha -1 ), straw yield (34.88q ha -1 ) and harvest index (36.03 per cent) were<br />

observed in control.<br />

The highest agronomic nitrogen use efficiency (42.34) was observed in FDP with 80% N +100%<br />

PK <strong>of</strong> RDF in both the years, whereas maximum recovery efficiency <strong>of</strong> nitrogen (0. 60),<br />

phosphorus (0.51), and potassium (0.97) was reported in the treatment FDP with 120 % N and<br />

100 % PK <strong>of</strong> RDF.The data clearly indicate that the deep placement <strong>of</strong> NPK briquettes enhanced<br />

the recovery <strong>of</strong> applied N, P and K compared to broadcast application <strong>of</strong> NPK fertilizers. Highest<br />

N partial factor productivity (0.92) was observed in FDP with 60 % N and 100 % PK <strong>of</strong> RDF.<br />

Pooled effect <strong>of</strong> fertilizer management practices on nitrogen agronomic efficiency, partial<br />

factor productivity <strong>of</strong> nitrogen and recovery efficiency <strong>of</strong> nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium<br />

in direct seeded rice<br />

Treatment<br />

N Agronomic<br />

efficiency<br />

(kg grainincrease/kg<br />

N applied)<br />

Partial factor<br />

productivity<br />

(kg grain/kg N<br />

applied)<br />

Recovery efficiency (kg<br />

taken up /kg applied)<br />

N P K<br />

T 1: Control - - - - -<br />

T 2: Farmers’ practice 22.40 0.88 0.26 0.09 0.19<br />

T 3: RDF as per AAU 30.17 0.63 0.42 0.24 0.45<br />

T 4: BMP as per IRRI: 30.82 0.64 0.43 0.24 0.46<br />

T 5:FDP with 120% N 41.15 0.69 0.60 0.51 0.97<br />

Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming,<br />

INM, soil-microorganisms-plant interactions<br />

467 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

+100% PK<br />

T 6:FDP with 100% N<br />

+100% PK<br />

T 7:FDP with 80% N +100%<br />

PK<br />

T 8:FDP with 60% N +100%<br />

PK<br />

41.35 0.74 0.59 0.44 0.81<br />

42.34 0.83 0.58 0.36 0.67<br />

36.86 0.92 0.46 0.26 0.46<br />

Conclusion<br />

Overall, the results <strong>of</strong> this study indicated that using FDP with 120% N and 100% PK <strong>of</strong> RDF in<br />

Kharifcould be considered the best nutrient management practice for rice in terms <strong>of</strong> highest<br />

yield, N, P, and K recovery efficiency in direct seeded rice.<br />

References<br />

Anonymous. 2021. Rice Knowledge Bank, Assam https://www.rkbassam.in/<br />

Danso, F., Agyare, W. A. and Bart-Plange, A. 2021.Modelling rice yield from biochar-inorganic<br />

fertilizer amended fields. J. Agric. Food Res., 4:100123.<br />

Gaihre, Y. K., Singh, U., Islam, S. M., Huda, A., Islam, M. R., Sanabria, J. and Jahan, M. 2018.<br />

Nitrous oxide and nitric oxide emissions and nitrogen use efficiency as affected by<br />

nitrogen placement in lowland rice fields. Nutr. Cycling Agroecosyst. 110(2): 277-291.<br />

T4-13P-1058<br />

Sowing dates and Nutrient Management Practices in Spring-Summer Black<br />

Gram [Vigna Mungo (L.) Hepper] For Optimization <strong>of</strong> Growth and<br />

Production<br />

Purabi Banerjee 1,2 , V. Visha Kumari 2 and Rajib Nath 1<br />

1 Bidhan Chandra Krishi Viswavidyalaya, Mohanpur 741252, Nadia, West Bengal, India.<br />

2 ICAR-Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, Santoshnagar, Hyderabad 500059,<br />

Telangana, India<br />

Black gram [Vigna mungo (L.) Hepper] is a widely grown pulse crop assuming considerable<br />

important for food and nutritional security in India. Various research efforts have revealed the<br />

crucial and diverse roles <strong>of</strong> the nutrient elements, i.e., cobalt (Co), potassium (K) and boron (B)<br />

in overall development <strong>of</strong> pulse crops (Banerjee et al., 2021a).Besides, foliar nutrition at the<br />

onset <strong>of</strong> reproductive phase is incredibly effective in mitigating physiological shortcomings in<br />

468 | Page Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming, INM, soilmicroorganisms-plant<br />

interactions


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

legumes including premature shedding <strong>of</strong> flower and pod and thus increasing seed yield,<br />

exclusively established in case <strong>of</strong> black gram (Banerjee et al., 2021b). Against this background,<br />

a two-year experiment was framed with an objective to evaluate the crucial and diverse role <strong>of</strong><br />

the Co, K and B on growth, yield and quality <strong>of</strong> black gram.<br />

Methodology<br />

A field experiment was conducted in A-B Block (District Seed Farm), B.C.K.V., Kalyani, West<br />

Bengal, India during the subsequent spring-summer seasons <strong>of</strong> 2020 and 2021. Black gram<br />

(variety: Pant Urd 31) was sown. The experiment was laid out in a split-split plot design<br />

replicated thrice with two sowing dates (March first week and March third week) in main plot,<br />

two soil application levels <strong>of</strong> cobalt (No cobalt and cobalt at 4 kg ha −1 ) in sub-plots and five<br />

foliar sprays <strong>of</strong> K and B at flower initiation stage in various combinations (no spray, spray <strong>of</strong> tap<br />

water, 1.25%K, 0.2%B and1.25%K + 0.2%B) in sub-sub plots.<br />

Results<br />

The pooled analysis <strong>of</strong> the data has shown that March1 st week sown crop exhibited a higher<br />

growth rate compared to the March 3 rd week sown crop, thisresulted in higher production. The<br />

Co application as basal dose recorded significantly higher growth and yield attributes <strong>of</strong> black<br />

gram over without application <strong>of</strong> Co. Foliar K+B application significantly increased (p≤0.05) dry<br />

matter accumulation (178.7 g m -2 ), number <strong>of</strong> root nodules plant -1 (43.6), crop growth rate<br />

(CGR: 4.76) and no. <strong>of</strong> pods plant -1 (41.2), which resulted in higher seed yield (1481.4 kg ha -1 .<br />

Seed yield <strong>of</strong> black gram was found to be a linear function <strong>of</strong> number <strong>of</strong> pods per plant,<br />

explaining about 96.59 and 93.98 % variations respectively during 2020 and 2021.<br />

Growth, yield and quality <strong>of</strong> black gram as influenced by date <strong>of</strong> sowing, soil application<br />

and foliar nutrition during spring-summer season (pooled)<br />

Treatment<br />

Dry matter<br />

(g m -2 )<br />

Number <strong>of</strong><br />

Nodules plant -1<br />

CGR<br />

(g m -2 day -1 )<br />

Pods<br />

plant -1<br />

Seed yield<br />

(kg ha -1 )<br />

March 1 st week 170.3 41.4 4.44 33.8 1251.9<br />

March 3 rd week 162.1 37.9 4.35 30.9 1120.7<br />

S.Em(+) 0.17 0.08 0.01 0.29 6.15<br />

L.S.D. (P=0.05) 1.04 0.51 0.09 1.71 17.94<br />

No cobalt 161.9 37.7 4.28 27.7 1095.4<br />

Cobalt at 4 kg ha -1 170.5 41.6 4.46 34.0 1277.2<br />

S.Em(+) 0.45 0.12 0.03 0.33 4.25<br />

L.S.D. (P=0.05) 1.86 0.49 0.10 1.30 16.59<br />

Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming,<br />

INM, soil-microorganisms-plant interactions<br />

469 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

No spray 155.5 36.2 3.98 19.7 858.6<br />

Tap water 159.1 37.4 4.28 25.4 1048.4<br />

1.25% K 165.9 39.6 4.32 31.1 1200.2<br />

0.2% B 171.9 41.4 4.55 36.4 1342.8<br />

1.25% K + 0.2% B 178.7 43.6 4.76 41.2 1481.4<br />

S.Em(+) 0.73 0.24 0.05 0.41 9.07<br />

L.S.D. (P=0.05) 2.09 0.70 0.19 1.18 26.13<br />

Conclusion<br />

Sowing in March first week in combination with basal soil application <strong>of</strong> Co at 4 kg ha −1 and<br />

foliar nutrition <strong>of</strong> K (1.25%) and B (0.2%) at flower initiation stage have immense potential to<br />

intensify black gram growth and production. Even in case <strong>of</strong> delayed sowing, application <strong>of</strong> Co<br />

in soil combined with K+B foliar spray can sustain optimum production potential <strong>of</strong> black gram<br />

during spring-summer season in Eastern India.<br />

References<br />

Banerjee, P., Mukherjee, B., Venugopalan, V. K., Nath, R., Chandran, M. A. S., Dessoky, E. S., Ismail, I.<br />

A., El-Hallous, E. I. and Hossain, A. (2021a). Thermal Response <strong>of</strong> Spring–Summer-Grown<br />

Black Gram (Vigna mungo L. Hepper) in Indian Subtropics. Atmosphere, 12, 1-20.<br />

Banerjee, P., Venugopalan, V.K., Nath, R., Althobaiti, Y.S., Gaber, A., Al-Yasi, H. and Hossain, A.<br />

(2021b). Physiology, Growth and Productivity <strong>of</strong> Spring–Summer Black Gram (Vigna mungo L.<br />

Hepper) as Influenced by Heat and Moisture Stresses in Different Dates <strong>of</strong> Sowing and Nutrient<br />

Management Conditions. Agron.11, 1-24.<br />

T4-14P-1060<br />

Effect <strong>of</strong> N Fertilization on Grain N Content and Productivity <strong>of</strong> Rice and<br />

Maize<br />

Surajit Mondal 1 , Rakesh Kumar 1 , J.S. Mishra 1 , V.K. Singh 2 , Anchal Dass 2 ,<br />

A.K. Choudhary 1 and A. Upadhyaya 1<br />

1 ICAR Research Complex for Eastern Region, Patna – 800 014, Bihar, India<br />

2 ICAR Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi – 110 012, India<br />

The indiscriminate use <strong>of</strong> fertilizer degrades the soil health and pollutes the environment<br />

(Galloway et al., 2008) while lower use <strong>of</strong> fertilizer is causing lower productivity. Hence,<br />

fertilizer application must be optimized for sustainable higher yield, lower cost <strong>of</strong> cultivation and<br />

a cleaner and environment-friendly production system (Zhang et al., 2015). Rice and maize are<br />

470 | Page Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming, INM, soilmicroorganisms-plant<br />

interactions


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

the major consumers <strong>of</strong> nitrogen fertilizer and need optimization in terms <strong>of</strong> input use efficiency.<br />

Grain quality should also be emphasized for achieving nutritional security.<br />

Methodology<br />

Field experiments on maize and rice are being implemented during rabi2020-21andkharif 2021,<br />

respectively, at the experimental farm <strong>of</strong> ICAR Research Complex for Eastern Region, Patna to<br />

evaluate the effect <strong>of</strong> different doses <strong>of</strong> nitrogen (N) on yield parameter <strong>of</strong> rice, and N content <strong>of</strong> leaf<br />

at different growth stages <strong>of</strong> rice and maize. The treatments were 0 to 240 kg N ha -1 at 40 kg intervals<br />

(N0 to N240). Varieties used were TM 214, S2 946, S2 981, 2ATM211 and 2ATM214 for maize,<br />

and Swarna Shreya, Swarna Samridhidhan, Swarna Shakti, Swarna SukhaDhan and RCPR 58 for<br />

rice. N was applied at three equal splits. Each 1/3 rd <strong>of</strong> N was applied at seeding, knee height and<br />

tasseling stages for maize and at transplantation, maximum tillering and panicle initiation stages for<br />

rice.<br />

Results<br />

The impact <strong>of</strong> different nitrogen doses on grain yield <strong>of</strong> maize and rice was clearly discernible (Fig).<br />

The grain yield <strong>of</strong> maize increased with an increase in N-dose up to 200 kg N ha -1 and beyond that,<br />

no significant gain in yield was noted with additional N-application. The lowest yield <strong>of</strong> 3.87 t ha -<br />

1 was noted in N0 while the highest yield <strong>of</strong> 8.06 t ha -1 was noted in 240 kg N ha -1 and it was at par<br />

with 200 kg N ha -1 . Among the different genotypes, S2 946 and S2 981 recorded maximum (6.63 t<br />

ha -1 ) and minimum (5.01 t ha -1 ), respectively.In contrast to maize, rice grain yield increased up to an<br />

N dose <strong>of</strong> 80 kg ha-1; beyond that, yield was similar. The lowest and highest yield <strong>of</strong> rice was<br />

registered in 0 kg N ha -1 (3.34 t ha -1 ) and 160 kg N ha -1 (4.94 t ha -1 ).However, the effect <strong>of</strong> genotype<br />

was absent on rice yield and all genotypes noted similar yield (4.25-4.57 t ha -1 ).<br />

Yield <strong>of</strong> maize and rice as affected by different doses <strong>of</strong> N.Mean values followed by different small letters<br />

within N-dose or genotypes are significantly different at P < 0.05 by DMRT.<br />

Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming,<br />

INM, soil-microorganisms-plant interactions<br />

471 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

The correlation between yield and N-dose was significant for both rice and wheat (data not<br />

presented). The yield increase for each kg <strong>of</strong> N was 19.25 and 4.88 kg for maize and rice,<br />

respectively. A quadratic function was also fitted with the yield and N- dose and data and the<br />

most pr<strong>of</strong>itable fertilizer dose was worked out as 211 and 159 kg N ha -1 for maize and rice,<br />

respectively. An N dose <strong>of</strong> 200 kg ha -1 registered the highest agronomic efficiency (AE) for<br />

maize while the same was 80 kg N ha -1 for rice. However, for partial factor productivity (PFP)<br />

irrespective <strong>of</strong> crops, the highest value was noted for 40 kg N ha -1 while the lowest was for 240<br />

kg N ha -1 .<br />

Mean values followed by different small letters within N-dose or genotypes are significantly<br />

different at P < 0.05 by Duncan’s Multiple Range Test.The grain N content <strong>of</strong> rice was<br />

significantly affected by different amounts <strong>of</strong> nitrogen and genotypes. The lowest grain N<br />

content was 1.09% for 0 kg N ha -1 while the highest was 1.49 for 240 kg N ha -1 . Among rice<br />

genotypes, the highest N content <strong>of</strong> grain was observed for Swarna Samridhi (1.39%) and the<br />

lowest was for RCPR 58 (1.24%).<br />

Conclusions<br />

Higher production <strong>of</strong> high-quality grain (higher grain N content) requires higher application <strong>of</strong><br />

fertilizer and greater uptake by crops.The maize was more responsive to fertilizer N than rice.<br />

Hence, fertilizer level must be optimized to balance grain yield, grain N content and pr<strong>of</strong>it.<br />

References<br />

Galloway, J. N., Townsend, A. R., Erisman, J. W., Bekunda, M., Cai, Z., Freney, J. R. and<br />

Sutton, M. A. 2008. Transformation <strong>of</strong> the nitrogen cycle: recent trends, questions, and<br />

potential solutions. Science, 320(5878): 889 – 892.<br />

Zhang, X., Davidson, E. A., Mauzerall, D. L., Searchinger, T. D., Dumas, P. and Shen, Y. 2015.<br />

Managing nitrogen for sustainable development. Nature. 528(7580): 51 – 59.<br />

472 | Page Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming, INM, soilmicroorganisms-plant<br />

interactions


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Integrated Approach for Zinc Enrichment in Rainfed Maize<br />

P. Nandini 1* , P. Laxminarayana 1 , K. Bhanu Rekha 1 and T. Anjaiah 2<br />

T4-15P-1064<br />

1 Department <strong>of</strong> Agronomy, 2 Deparment <strong>of</strong> Soil Science and Agricultural Chemistry,<br />

College <strong>of</strong> Agriculture, Pr<strong>of</strong>essor Jayashankar Telangana State Agricultural University, Rajendranagar,<br />

Hyderabad-500030, Telangana, India<br />

* nandu60109@gmail.com<br />

Maize (Zea mays L) the ‘Queen <strong>of</strong> Cereals’ is the third most important cereal crop in the world.<br />

Agronomic zinc bi<strong>of</strong>ortification in maize is useful to overcome the hidden hunger for Zn<br />

(Muhammad and Abdul, 2018). Zinc solubilising bacteria are capable <strong>of</strong> solubilizing ZnO,<br />

ZnCO3 and zinc phosphate through production and excretion <strong>of</strong> organic acids (Sruthi, 2013).<br />

Micronutrients like Zn, Fe, B, Mo etc., are mostly used in polymer coating. Polymers are mostly<br />

used in coating <strong>of</strong> fertilizers for slow release <strong>of</strong> fertilizer from polymer coated fertilizers<br />

(Shahzad et al., 2019).<br />

Methodology<br />

The experiment was conducted during Kharif, 2019at College Farm (Plot no. B-8, Block-B),<br />

College <strong>of</strong> Agriculture, Rajendranagar, PJTSAU, Hyderabad. The experimental site was located<br />

at 17°19' 19.2" N Latitude, 78°24' 39.2” E Longitude at an altitude <strong>of</strong> 542.3 m above mean sea<br />

level and lies under Southern Telangana Zone.Maize hybrid NK-6240 @ 20 kg ha -1 was sown on<br />

ridges at spacing <strong>of</strong> 60 cm × 20 cm. Recommended dose <strong>of</strong> fertilizer (RDF- 200: 60: 50-N: P2O5:<br />

K2O kg ha -1 ) N was applied in three equal splits (at sowing, knee-high and tasseling stage), total<br />

P was applied as basal and K was applied in two equal splits (at sowing and tasseling stage).<br />

Crop was entirely grown under rainfall which accounted to 680.8 mm.<br />

Results<br />

Plant height has shown a linear increase at all the stages <strong>of</strong> crop period. A perusal <strong>of</strong> data<br />

revealed that plant height significantly influenced by integrated approach for zinc enrichment at<br />

30 DAS, knee high stage and at harvest except at 60 DAS. On the whole, significant variation in<br />

the plant height with T5 and T7 might be due to rapid cell division and elongation as a result <strong>of</strong><br />

availability <strong>of</strong> the needed nutrients to the plant at critical growth stages coupled with application<br />

<strong>of</strong> zinc might have resulted in improvement <strong>of</strong> metallo enzyme system regulatory function and<br />

growth promoting auxin production resulting in increased plant height linearly. Similar results<br />

were earlier reported by Hekmatet al. (2019).<br />

Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming,<br />

INM, soil-microorganisms-plant interactions<br />

473 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Number <strong>of</strong> Leaves Per Plant<br />

The number <strong>of</strong> leaves per plant recorded at 30 DAS, knee high stage, 60 DAS and at harvest. A<br />

scrutiny <strong>of</strong> data revealed that no. <strong>of</strong> leaves in maize differed significantly due to treatments at all<br />

the stages <strong>of</strong> observation except at 30 DAS.No. <strong>of</strong> leaves produced by plant at different stages<br />

increased linearly from 30 DAS to harvest. At knee high stage, 60 DAS and at harvest, highest<br />

number <strong>of</strong> leaves was recorded with T5 {RDF + FYM enrichment with 50 kg ZnSO4 ha -1 } and<br />

was on par with other treatments viz., T2, T4, T7 and T10. The lowest number <strong>of</strong> leaves was<br />

registered with T1 [RDF alone (Control) N: P2O5: K2O - 200:60:50 kg ha -1 ]. From the results it is<br />

inferred that number <strong>of</strong> leaves per plant has shown a gradual increase from seedling to vegetative<br />

stage. Similar trend was also observed by Hekmatet al. (2019) and Singh et al. (2016).<br />

Conclusion<br />

The growth parameters were significantly higher with treatments that consisted <strong>of</strong> conjunctive<br />

Zn application along with organic manures (FYM and inorganic fertilizers), T5 (RDF + FYM<br />

enrichment with 50 kg ZnSO4 ha -1 ) and also shown on par results with T7 {RDF + ZSB (1kg/100<br />

kg FYM) + 0.2% Foliar spray <strong>of</strong> ZnSO4 (Knee-high and Tasseling stages)}.<br />

References<br />

Hekmat, A.W., Mohammadi, N.K. and Ghosh, G. 2019. Effect <strong>of</strong> NPK, bi<strong>of</strong>ertilizer and zinc<br />

foliar nutrition on growth and yield attributes <strong>of</strong> baby corn (Zea mays L.). In. J.<br />

Chemical Stud., 7(4): 2432-2436.<br />

Muhammad, A.M. and Abdul, R.B. 2018. Zinc bi<strong>of</strong>ortification <strong>of</strong> maize (Zea mays L.): Status<br />

and challenges. Plant Breed., 138:1–28.<br />

Shahzad, R., Akbar, S., Jamil, S., Javed, M.A., Jamil, M.W., Fatima, N. and Iqbal, M.Z. 2019.<br />

Polymer coating based enhancement <strong>of</strong> fertilizer use efficiency and growth <strong>of</strong> wheat<br />

crop. Int. J. Biosci.14(2): 562-572.<br />

Singh, G., Singh, N. and Kaur, R. 2016. Integrated nutrient management for increasing growth<br />

with sustainability <strong>of</strong> baby corn. Int. J. Bioassays. 5 (2): 4817-4820.<br />

Sruthi, P. 2013. Studies on Zinc solubilizing bacteria and their effect on growth and yield <strong>of</strong><br />

maize (ZeaMaysL.). MSc (Ag) thesis submitted to UAS, Dharwad. 1:72.<br />

474 | Page Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming, INM, soilmicroorganisms-plant<br />

interactions


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

T1<br />

T2<br />

Effect <strong>of</strong> Integrated approach for zinc enrichment in rainfed maize on number <strong>of</strong> leaves<br />

plant -1 at 30 DAS, knee-high, 60 DAS and at harvest<br />

Treatments<br />

RDF alone (Control) [N: P 2O 5: K 2O -<br />

200:60:50 kg ha -1 ]<br />

RDF + Zinc Solubilising Bacteria (ZSB @<br />

1kg/100 kg FYM)<br />

30<br />

DAS<br />

No. <strong>of</strong> leaves per plant<br />

Knee-high<br />

stage<br />

60 DAS At harvest<br />

4.33 4.93 10.97 12.50<br />

4.53 5.53 13.37 14.20<br />

T3 RDF + FYM (25 t ha -1 ) 4.8 5.73 12.87 13.87<br />

T4 RDF + Seed pelleting (3.6 g ZnSO 4 kg -1 seed) 4.73 5.80 12.87 13.87<br />

T5 RDF + FYM enrichment with 50 kg ZnSO 4 ha -1 4.87 6.47 14.27 15.50<br />

T6<br />

T7<br />

T8<br />

T9<br />

T10<br />

RDF + 0.2% Foliar spray <strong>of</strong> ZnSO 4 (Knee-high<br />

and Tasseling stages)<br />

RDF + ZSB (1kg/100 kg FYM) + 0.2% Foliar<br />

spray <strong>of</strong> ZnSO 4 (Knee-high and Tasseling<br />

stages)<br />

RDF + FYM (25 t ha -1 ) + 0.2% Foliar spray <strong>of</strong><br />

ZnSO 4 (Knee-high and Tasseling stages)<br />

RDF +Seed pelleting + 0.2% Foliar spray <strong>of</strong><br />

ZnSO 4 (Knee-high and Tasseling stages)<br />

RDF + FYM enrichment with 50 kg ZnSO 4 ha -1<br />

+ 0.2% Foliar spray <strong>of</strong> ZnSO 4 (Knee-high and<br />

Tasseling stages)<br />

4.8 5.27 11.67 12.87<br />

4.8 6.20 13.60 14.67<br />

4.67 5.47 11.93 14.07<br />

4.8 5.60 12.67 13.67<br />

4.87 5.93 13.27 14.33<br />

SEm± 0.2 0.23 0.46 0.42<br />

CD (p=0.05) NS 0.70 1.38 1.27<br />

Plant height (cm) as influenced by integrated approach for zinc enrichment in rainfed maize.<br />

Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming,<br />

INM, soil-microorganisms-plant interactions<br />

475 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

T4-16P-162841<br />

Influence <strong>of</strong> Integrated Nutrient Management on Soil Properties, Crop Yields<br />

and Water Use Efficiency in Rainfed Maize-Wheat Rotation<br />

Mohammad Amin Bhat, M.J. Singh, Anil Khokhar, Abrar Yousuf,<br />

Parminder Singh Sandhu and Balwinder Singh Dhillon<br />

Regional Research Station, Punjab Agricultural University, Ballowal Saunkhri, SBS Nagar, Punjab-<br />

144521<br />

Nutrient management is imperative to increase productivity <strong>of</strong> maize-wheat system, a prominent<br />

multiple cropping system operational in dryland areas <strong>of</strong> the northwest India. The productivity <strong>of</strong><br />

maize and wheat not only depends on adequate nutrition but also the appropriate nutrient<br />

management approaches. Nevertheless, the farming systems practiced in India are exploitative in<br />

character making it difficult to maintain soil fertility and affecting long-term viability <strong>of</strong><br />

agriculture (Ghosh et al 2021). Nitrogen is the essential element, the deficiency <strong>of</strong> which restricts<br />

crop production. Chemical fertilizers are the predominant source <strong>of</strong> nitrogen in agricultural<br />

production systems. No doubt, inorganic fertilization substantially augments crop yield; but, the<br />

supply <strong>of</strong> nutrients solely through synthetic fertilizers does not fulfill the complete nutrient<br />

demand <strong>of</strong> the crops (Khokhar et al 2022). The sustained and prudent use <strong>of</strong> manures improves<br />

physico-chemical characteristics <strong>of</strong> all soils, especially those having shallow pr<strong>of</strong>ile depth,<br />

coarse-texture and lower content <strong>of</strong> organic matter, and reduces the risk <strong>of</strong> soil and water quality<br />

degradation (Amoah et al 2012). The regular addition <strong>of</strong> organic manures is frequently<br />

recommended in India to maintain soil fertility, although its usage is rapidly declining due to<br />

farm mechanization, greater use <strong>of</strong> inorganic fertilizers, and a reduction in the size <strong>of</strong> livestock.<br />

However, the commercial fertilizers are becoming increasingly expensive, therefore, organic<br />

manures, like FYM, continue to be an appropriate substitute to commercial fertilizers. Therefore,<br />

this study was intended to evaluate the effect <strong>of</strong> INM on soil properties, crop yields and water<br />

use efficiency under rainfed conditions.<br />

Methodology<br />

The study was conducted in an on-going 5-year-old experiment started in 2017 at Regional<br />

Research Station, Punjab Agricultural University, Ballowal Saunkhri. The study area lies in<br />

subhumid subtropical climate having hot summers and cold winters. The experiment on maizewheat<br />

system has a combination <strong>of</strong> FYM and fertilizer treatments. The plots, 43.2m 2 (5.4m ×<br />

8m) in size, were replicated thrice in randomized complete block design (RCBD). The treatments<br />

<strong>of</strong> synthetic fertilizers and FYM compared. Farmyard manure was incorporated into the soil<br />

476 | Page Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming, INM, soilmicroorganisms-plant<br />

interactions


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

before the sowing <strong>of</strong> maize and wheat as per the treatments. The sources <strong>of</strong> N, P and K were<br />

urea, single superphosphate and diammonium phosphate and muriate <strong>of</strong> potash. Maize (PMH 13)<br />

and wheat (PBW 660) were grown in monsoon (July to September) and winter season<br />

(November to April), respectively. One half <strong>of</strong> N was applied at the time <strong>of</strong> sowing and<br />

remaining half at knee high stage in maize and crown root initiation stage in wheat. Other<br />

recommended cultural practices for both the crops were followed throughout the study.<br />

Results<br />

The yield <strong>of</strong> maize increased with nutrient management treatments as compared to control.<br />

Significantly higher grain yield <strong>of</strong> maize (3711 kg ha˗1 ) was recorded with 100% NPK + FYM<br />

10 t ha˗1 as compared to control, N (100% RDF) and NP (100% RDF) but was statistically at par<br />

with all other treatments. The higher water use efficiency (6.25 kg ha˗1 mm˗1 ) was also recorded<br />

in the treatment 100% NPK + FYM 10 t ha˗1 as compared to other treatments. In wheat,<br />

significantly higher grain yield was recorded with 100% NPK + FYM 10 t ha˗1 as compared to<br />

control, N (100% RDF), 100%N through FYM and 100%N through FYM+ bi<strong>of</strong>ertilizers but was<br />

statistically at par with all other treatments. The highest water use efficiency was also recorded in<br />

the treatment 100% NPK + FYM 10 t ha. Soil moisture exhibited significant variation among the<br />

treatments. The FYM substituted plots, by and large, had significantly higher soil moisture than<br />

sole chemical fertilized and control treatments. Organic carbon exhibited significant variation<br />

among different treatments and highest OC was recorded in NPK (100%RDF) + FYM10 t ha˗1 as<br />

compared to all other treatments.<br />

Effect <strong>of</strong> integrated nutrient management on yield and water use efficiency <strong>of</strong> rainfed<br />

Treatments<br />

maize-wheat system<br />

Grain<br />

yield<br />

(kg/ha)<br />

Maize Wheat Soil properties<br />

WUE<br />

(kg/hamm)<br />

Grain yield<br />

(kg/ha)<br />

WUE<br />

(kg/hamm)<br />

Soil<br />

moisture<br />

(%)<br />

Control 1370 d 2.31 d 1883 d 9.49 e 11.46 c 0.41 c<br />

N(100% RDF) 2141 cd 3.60 cd 3017 bc 15.40 cd 11.51 c 0.42 bc<br />

NP(100%RDF) 2244 bcd 3.78 bcd 3258 abc 16.62 bcd 11.58 c 0.48 abc<br />

NPK(100%RDF)(DAP) 3065 abc 5.16 abc 4050 ab 20.70 abc 12.39 bc 0.48 abc<br />

NPK(100%RDF)+S(SSP) 3101 abc 5.22 abc 3792 ab 19.36 abc 11.78 c 0.48 abc<br />

NPK(100% RDF)+ZnSO 4 3246 ab 5.47 ab 4267 a 21.76 ab 11.38 c 0.51 ab<br />

NPK(50%RDF)+FYM10t/ha 3215 ab 5.41 ab 3492 abc 18.27 abcd 13.41 ab 0.52 a<br />

NPK(100%RDF)+FYM10t/ha 3711 a 6.25 a 4292 a 22.46 a 14.51 a 0.56 a<br />

NPK(150%RDF) 3305 ab 5.56 ab 3683 ab 19.08 abcd 12.30 bc 0.55 a<br />

SOC<br />

(%)<br />

Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming,<br />

INM, soil-microorganisms-plant interactions<br />

477 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

100%N Through FYM 2733 abc 4.60 abc 2550 cd 13.46 de 12.51 bc 0.52 a<br />

100%N Through FYM +Bi<strong>of</strong>ertilizers 2828 abc 4.76 abc 2950 bcd 15.77 cd 12.97 abc 0.53 a<br />

Conclusion<br />

Integrated nutrient management enhanced crop yield, water use efficiency and improves soil<br />

properties under maize-wheat cropping system.<br />

References<br />

Amoah, A.A., Senge, M., Miyagawa, S. and Itou, K. 2012. Effects <strong>of</strong> soil fertility management<br />

on growth, yield, and water-use efficiency <strong>of</strong> maize (Zea mays L.) and selected soil<br />

properties. Comm. in Soil Sci. and Plant Analysis. 43(6): 924–935.<br />

Ghosh, D., Mandal, M. and Pattanayak, S.K. 2021. Long-term effect <strong>of</strong> integrated nutrient<br />

management on dynamics <strong>of</strong> phosphorous in an acid Inceptisols <strong>of</strong> tropical India.<br />

Communi. Soil Sci. Plant Anal., DOI: 10.1080/00103624.2021.1924186<br />

Khokhar, A., Bhat, M.A., Singh, M.J., Yousuf, A., Sharma, V. and Sandhu, P.S. 2022. Soil<br />

properties, nutrient availability vis-à-vis uptake and productivity <strong>of</strong> rainfed maize-wheat<br />

system in response to long-term tillage and n management in northwest India. Communic.<br />

Soil Sci. Plant Anal., 53(22): 2935-2954<br />

T4-17P-1085<br />

Effect <strong>of</strong> Mulching and Integrated Nutrient Management on Growth <strong>of</strong> Kharif<br />

Maize under Dryland Condition<br />

Sudhanshu Verma*, Sudhir Kr. Rajpoot, S. K. Verma and J. P. Singh<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Agronomy, Institute <strong>of</strong> Agricultural Sciences, Banaras Hindu University,<br />

Varanasi- 221 005<br />

*sudhanshubcn@gmail.com<br />

Maize is one <strong>of</strong> the most versatile crops and has the highest genetic yield potential and known as<br />

the queen <strong>of</strong> cereals in the world. Maize is considered the third most important food crop among<br />

the cereals in India that contributed to nearly 9% <strong>of</strong> the national food security. Maize is a<br />

staplefood, and quality feed, and used as a basic raw material for thousands <strong>of</strong> industrial<br />

products. The average productivity in India is 2.43 t ha -1 . The productivity <strong>of</strong> maize is limited<br />

due to moisture stress and this could be achieved by soil and nutrient management practices as<br />

these are <strong>of</strong> paramount concern to conserve soil moisture and improve productivity and fertility.<br />

478 | Page Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming, INM, soilmicroorganisms-plant<br />

interactions


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Mulch particularly restricts the transport <strong>of</strong> water vapor from the soil surface to the<br />

microclimate, which diminishesthe direct evaporation loss <strong>of</strong> water and increases the availability<br />

<strong>of</strong> soil water to the crops and resulting inthe regulation <strong>of</strong> soil temperature. The residues <strong>of</strong><br />

mulches such as jowar or bajra stubbles, paddy straw or husk, saw dust, etc. left on the soil<br />

eliminate soil loss by preventing water and wind erosion and improvingthe chemical, physical<br />

and biological properties <strong>of</strong> soil.<br />

Maize being a heavy feeder requires much more nutrients compared to other crops and in order<br />

to meet those nutritional requirements the farmers apply large quantities <strong>of</strong> inorganic fertilizers<br />

without understanding its negative impact onthe fertility status <strong>of</strong> the soil as well as the<br />

environment. The supplementary and complementary use <strong>of</strong> organic manures, viz. farm yard<br />

manure, poultry manure, vermicompost, castor cake, and inorganic fertilizers plays an important<br />

role in the growth and yield <strong>of</strong> the crop and enhances the soil health<br />

Methodology<br />

Afield experiment was conducted during the Kharifseason<strong>of</strong> 2017 at the Agricultural Research<br />

Farm <strong>of</strong> the Institute <strong>of</strong> Agricultural Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi. The<br />

experiment was laid out in a split-plot design, keeping mulching treatments asmain plots and<br />

integrated nutrient management treatments assubplots, with 3 replications. The treatment were:<br />

M1: control (no mulch), M2: dust mulch, and M3: rice straw mulch. The subplot treatments were:<br />

S1:100% RDF, S2:75% RDF + 25 % N through poultry manure, S3: 100% RDF + 25 % N<br />

through poultry manure, S4: 75% RDF + 25 % N through FYM and S5: 100% RDF + 25 % N<br />

through FYM where RDF is 120: 60: 60 kg N: P2O5: K2O ha -1 respectively. The maizecultivar<br />

‘K-99’ was chosen for the experiment. Well rotten poultry manure and FYM were taken from<br />

IFS (integrated farming system) and their chemical status. Observations on growth parameters <strong>of</strong><br />

maize were recorded and their significance was tested by the variance ratio (~F-value) at a 5%<br />

level. Treatment means were compared using critical differences (CD) at the 5% level <strong>of</strong><br />

significance. Relative economics was calculated as per the prevailing market prices <strong>of</strong> the inputs<br />

and produce during the years <strong>of</strong> experimentation.<br />

Results<br />

Mulching and integrated nutrient management showed significant variation ingrowth parameters<br />

<strong>of</strong> maize. Maximum mean number <strong>of</strong> leaves, plant height, leaf area index and chlorophyll<br />

content were recorded under dust mulch, which was statistically at par with rice straw mulch and<br />

significantly superior over control (no mulch), respectively. Similar results also found by Rajput<br />

et al. (2014). Integrated nutrient management practices had significant influence on number <strong>of</strong><br />

Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming,<br />

INM, soil-microorganisms-plant interactions<br />

479 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

leaves, plant height, leaf area index and chlorophyll content. Application <strong>of</strong> 100% RDF + 25 %<br />

N through poultry manure was recorded significantly number <strong>of</strong> leaves, plant height, leaf area<br />

index, and chlorophyll content over 75% RDF + 25 % N through poultry manure, 75% RDF + 25<br />

% N through FYM, 100% RDF and it were statistically at par with 100% RDF + 25 % N through<br />

FYM, respectively. The interaction effect between mulching and integrated nutrient management<br />

treatments on number <strong>of</strong> leaves, plant height, leaf area index and chlorophyll content were found<br />

to be non-significant. Similar findings were also reported by Iqbal et al. (2014), who observed<br />

that application <strong>of</strong> application <strong>of</strong> 75 % N from urea + 25 % N from poultry manure recorded<br />

significantly highest plant height and number <strong>of</strong> leaves per plant observed.<br />

Conclusion<br />

Based on the experimentation, it can be concluded that mulching and integrated nutrient<br />

management treatments had pronounced effect on growth <strong>of</strong> Kharifmaize. Dust mulch<br />

application produced the highest growth traits. Application <strong>of</strong> 100% RDF + 25 % N through<br />

poultry manure practice proved to be higher growth than other recommended dose <strong>of</strong> fertilizers.<br />

References<br />

Iqbal, A., Iqbal, M. A., Raza, A., Akbar, N., Abbas, R.N., Khan, H.Z. 2014. Integrated nitrogen<br />

management studies in forage maize. Am. Eurasian J. Agric. Environ. Sci.,14(8):744-747.<br />

Rajput, B. S., Maurya, S. K., Singh, R. N., Sen, A., Singh, R. K. 2014. Effect <strong>of</strong> different types<br />

<strong>of</strong> mulch on maize under guava (Psidium guajava) based agri-horti system. Online Int<br />

Interdiscip. Res. J, 4(3): 122-130.<br />

Effect <strong>of</strong> mulching and integrated nutrient management on growth <strong>of</strong> kharif maize<br />

Treatment<br />

Number<br />

<strong>of</strong> leaves<br />

Mulching<br />

Plant<br />

height<br />

(cm)<br />

Leaf<br />

area<br />

index at<br />

75 DAS<br />

Chlorophyll<br />

content at 75<br />

DAS<br />

(spad value)<br />

M1 : Control (No mulch) 7.54 190.0 3.72 39.7<br />

M2 : Dust mulch 9.53 216.0 4.27 45.2<br />

M3 : Rice straw mulch 8.97 206.1 4.16 42.2<br />

SEm± 0.38 4.8 0.10 1.0<br />

CD (p=0.05) 1.48 18.9 0.41 3.8<br />

480 | Page Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming, INM, soilmicroorganisms-plant<br />

interactions


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Integrated nutrient management<br />

S1:100% RDF 7.89 193.4 3.77 38.5<br />

S2:75% RDF + 25 % N through Poultry<br />

manure<br />

S3: 100% RDF + 25 % N through Poultry<br />

manure<br />

8.62 201.8 4.10 42.3<br />

9.50 217.3 4.38 46.5<br />

S4: 75% RDF + 25 % N through FYM 8.16 195.4 3.84 40.0<br />

S5: 100% RDF + 25 % N through FYM 9.23 212.0 4.17 44.6<br />

SEm± 0.27 5.8 0.11 1.0<br />

CD (p=0.05) 0.80 17.0 0.33 2.8<br />

T4-18P-1089<br />

Yield Maximization <strong>of</strong> Indian Mustard (Brassica juncea) through Integrated<br />

Nutrient Management under Dryland Condition<br />

S. K. Sharma*, Kuldeep Singh, S. K. Thakral and Parveen Kumar<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Agronomy, Chaudhary Charan Singh Haryana Agricultural University,<br />

Hisar 125004, Haryana, India<br />

*sksharma67@rediffmail.com<br />

Oilseeds are the second largest agricultural commodity after cereals in India. The mustard<br />

crop is the second most important edible oilseed crop in India after groundnut and accounts<br />

for nearly one-third <strong>of</strong> the oil produced in the country. Imbalanced nutrition is one <strong>of</strong> the<br />

important constraints towards higher mustard productivity. Hence, in order to improve crop<br />

productivity, and soil health and lessen the negative environmental impact integrated<br />

nutrient management (INM) is a viable agronomic option. The crop’s yield potential can be<br />

maximized by balanced and efficient use <strong>of</strong> organic and inorganic sources <strong>of</strong> nutrients.<br />

Therefore, the study was undertaken to find out the effect <strong>of</strong> various integrated nutrient<br />

management practices on the yield and economics <strong>of</strong> Indian mustard.<br />

Methodology<br />

A field experiment was conducted at Dryland Agriculture Research Farm <strong>of</strong> the Chaudhary<br />

Charan Singh Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar during the Rabi season <strong>of</strong> 2020-21. The<br />

experiment was laid out in a randomized block design with three replications. The treatments<br />

comprised <strong>of</strong> T1-control, T2-40:20 kg NP/ha (RDF), T3-50:25 kg NP/ha, T4-60:30 kg NP/ha, T5-<br />

40:20:10 kg NPK/ha, T6-50:25:12.5 kg NPK/ha, T7-60:30:15 kg NPK/ha, T8-20:20 kg NP/ha<br />

Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming,<br />

INM, soil-microorganisms-plant interactions<br />

481 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

(inorganic) + 20 kg N/ha (FYM), T9-25:25 kg NP/ha (inorganic) + 25 kg N/ha (FYM), T10-<br />

30:30 kg NP/ha (inorganic) + 30 kg N/ha (FYM), T11-20:20:10 kg NPK/ha (inorganic) + 20 kg<br />

N/ha (FYM), T12-25:25:12.5 kg NPK/ha (inorganic) + 25 kg N/ha (FYM) and T13-30:30:15 kg<br />

NPK/ha (inorganic) + 30 kg N/ha (FYM). Soil <strong>of</strong> the experimental field was sandy loam and<br />

having low organic carbon (0.16%), low available N (112 kg/ha), medium available P (17.0<br />

kg/ha) and high available K (436 kg/ha) with a pH <strong>of</strong> 7.8. Indian mustard variety ‘RH 725’ was<br />

sown on 23 October 2020 and harvested on 22 March 2021. The row spacing was 45 cm keeping<br />

a 5 kg seed rate/ha. Total rainfall <strong>of</strong> 38.4 mm was received during the crop growth period. The<br />

other agronomic practices were followed as per production recommendations during the crop<br />

growth period. All the fertilizers in the form <strong>of</strong> Urea, SSP and FYM were applied at the time <strong>of</strong><br />

sowing the crop.<br />

Results<br />

Different nutrient management treatments had higher growth and yield attributes <strong>of</strong> Indian<br />

mustard over control. Application <strong>of</strong> 30:30:15 kg NPK/ha (inorganic) + 30 kg N/ha (FYM)<br />

recorded significantly higher plant height, number <strong>of</strong> primary branches per plant, and siliquae<br />

per plant over the rest <strong>of</strong> treatments and were at par with application <strong>of</strong> 25:25:12.5 kg NPK/ha<br />

(inorganic) + 25 kg N/ha (FYM), 30:30 kg NP/ha (inorganic) + 30 kg N/ha (FYM) and 60:30:15<br />

kg NPK/ha treatments. Application <strong>of</strong> 30:30:15 kg NPK/ha (inorganic) + 30 kg N/ha (FYM)<br />

recorded significantly higher seed yield (3161 kg/ha) and stover yield (7901 kg/ha) <strong>of</strong> mustard<br />

compared to other treatments except treatment receiving 25:25:12.5 kg NPK/ha (inorganic) + 25<br />

kg N/ha (FYM), 30:30 kg NP/ha (inorganic) + 30 kg N/ha (FYM), 25:25 kg NP/ha (inorganic) +<br />

25 kg N/ha (FYM) and 60:30:15 kg NPK/ha. Varma et al. (2021) also found that integrated<br />

nutrient management improved the yield attributes and yield <strong>of</strong> Indian mustard. Higher net<br />

returns <strong>of</strong> ₹ 117353/ha were also recorded with the application <strong>of</strong> 30:30:15 kg NPK/ha<br />

(inorganic) + 30 kg N/ha (FYM). However, the highest BC ratio (4.62) was observed with the<br />

application <strong>of</strong> 60:30:15 kg NPK/ha (inorganic).<br />

Conclusion<br />

Application <strong>of</strong> 30:30:15 kg NPK/ha (inorganic) + 30 kg N/ha (FYM) resulted in significantly<br />

higher yield attributes and yield <strong>of</strong> Indian mustard. Similarly, higher net returns were also<br />

recorded with the application <strong>of</strong> 30:30:15 kg NPK/ha (inorganic) + 30 kg N/ha (FYM) under<br />

sandy loam soils in arid/semi-arid regions. The highest BC ratio was observed with the<br />

application <strong>of</strong> 60:30:15 kg NPK/ha (inorganic).<br />

482 | Page Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming, INM, soilmicroorganisms-plant<br />

interactions


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

References<br />

Varma, G. R., Satish, P., Hussain, S. A. and Sharma, H. K. 2021. Effect <strong>of</strong> integrated nutrient<br />

Treatments<br />

management on productivity and economics <strong>of</strong> Indian mustard (Brassica juncea). Int. J.<br />

Environ. Clim. 11(6): 169-176.<br />

Effect <strong>of</strong> treatments on crop yield and economics <strong>of</strong> Indian mustard<br />

Seed<br />

yield<br />

(kg/ha)<br />

Stover<br />

yield<br />

(kg/ha)<br />

Gross<br />

returns<br />

(₹/ha)<br />

Net<br />

returns<br />

(₹/ha)<br />

Control 2313 5981 110545 82145 3.89<br />

40:20 kg NP/ha (RDF) 2756 7115 131712 101937 4.42<br />

50:25 kg NP/ha 2819 7362 134765 104646 4.47<br />

60:30 kg NP/ha 2937 7560 140351 109889 4.61<br />

40:20:10 kg NPK/ha 2828 7241 135123 105033 4.49<br />

50:25:12.5 kg NPK/ha 2905 7512 138839 108326 4.55<br />

60:30:15 kg NPK/ha 2992 7668 142962 112026 4.62<br />

20:20 kg NP/ha (inorganic) + 20 kg N/ha (FYM) 2907 7362 138857 107316 4.40<br />

25:25 kg NP/ha (inorganic) + 25 kg N/ha (FYM) 2991 7641 142902 110577 4.42<br />

30:30 kg NP/ha (inorganic) + 30 kg N/ha (FYM) 3104 7986 148329 115219 4.48<br />

20:20:10 kg NPK/ha (inorganic) + 20 kg N/ha (FYM) 2962 7442 141454 109598 4.44<br />

25:25:12.5 kg NPK/ha (inorganic) + 25 kg N/ha (FYM) 3052 7750 145793 113073 4.46<br />

30:30:15 kg NPK/ha (inorganic) + 30 kg N/ha (FYM) 3161 7901 150937 117353 4.49<br />

CD at 5% 174 388<br />

BC<br />

ratio<br />

T4-19P-1093<br />

Quality and Leaf Nutrient <strong>of</strong> Pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) Influenced<br />

by Integrated Nutrient Management<br />

Bhagyaresha R. Gajbhiye and H. K. Kausadikar<br />

AICRP on Long Term Fertilizer Experiment<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Soil Science and Agricultural Chemistry,<br />

Vasantrao Naik Marathwada Krishi Vidyapeeth, Parbhani (M.S.)-431402, India<br />

The fruit, pomegranate (Punica granatum L) contains nearly about 153 phytochemicals like<br />

ellagic acid, catechin and procyandins, fatty acids and triglycerides, sterols and terpenoids,<br />

flavonols etc. The fruit juice contains tannins, anthocyanin, polyphenols and antioxidants A, E<br />

and C which play major role in maintenance <strong>of</strong> heart blood vessels and proper blood circulation.<br />

Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming,<br />

INM, soil-microorganisms-plant interactions<br />

483 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

The integrated nutrient management infuses long term sustainability in the productivity level<br />

because <strong>of</strong> availability <strong>of</strong> nutrients in soil for next season crop. Incorporation <strong>of</strong> organic<br />

fertilizers is a common practice to improve the yield <strong>of</strong> many fruit crops. It also limits chemical<br />

intervention and finally minimizes the negative impact on the wider environment. The present<br />

fruit production in India meets only the 46 percent <strong>of</strong> the total demand. Thus there is a strong<br />

need to increase the production and productivity through crop diversification and use <strong>of</strong> best<br />

horticultural techniques among which Integrated Nutrient Management (INM) is the one.<br />

Therefore, the present investigation is planned with the objectives; to study the effect <strong>of</strong> INM<br />

practices on quality and temporal behaviour <strong>of</strong> pomegranate in respect <strong>of</strong> nutrient uptake.<br />

Methodology<br />

The total soluble solids were determined with the help <strong>of</strong> digital refractometer and values were<br />

corrected to 20 0 C with the help <strong>of</strong> temperature correction chart (A.O.A.C., 1975). The titrable<br />

acidity was calculated on the basis <strong>of</strong> one ml NaOH equivalent to 0.0067 g <strong>of</strong> anhydrous malic<br />

acid and the results were expressed as per cent acidity as per the method outlined in A.O.A.C<br />

(1980). Colour <strong>of</strong> pomegranate juice was determined by Hunter Colour EZ Flex by extraction <strong>of</strong><br />

juice using juice grinder and expressed in dimensions <strong>of</strong> L*, a* and b* values (Aaby et al.,<br />

2005). L*, a* and b* uniform colour space, L* indicates luminosity or lightness, a* chromacity<br />

on a green (-) to red (+) axis and b* chromacity on a blue (-) to yellow (+) axis. For estimation <strong>of</strong><br />

macro and micronutrients status <strong>of</strong> foliage, fifty fully mature and expanded current seasons<br />

leaves located at the 8 th position from the apex were collected all round the periphery <strong>of</strong> the plant<br />

as recommended by Bhargava and Dhander (1987).<br />

estimation <strong>of</strong> different plant nutrients.<br />

Results<br />

The standard methods adopted for<br />

Pooled data showed that the maximum total soluble sugar (13.45 0 Brix) was recorded with INM:<br />

FYM + Solubilizers + RDF +Umber (Ficus racemosa) Rhizosphere Hybridized Soil and found<br />

to be statistically at par with INM: FYM + solubilizers + RDF +Antibiotics and Antibiotics<br />

(Streptocycline) + RDF recording 12.75 and 12.69 0 Brix, respectively. The minimum<br />

(10.23 0 Brix) total soluble sugar was recorded at Absolute control.<br />

Titrable acidity <strong>of</strong> pomegranate fruit was significantly decreased with the application <strong>of</strong> different<br />

organic and inorganic sources through different treatments in both the years <strong>of</strong> study. The lowest<br />

amount <strong>of</strong> titrable acidity (0.28%) was noted with the application <strong>of</strong> INM (FYM + Solubilizers +<br />

RDF) +Umber (Ficus racemosa) Rhizosphere Hybridized Soil.<br />

484 | Page Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming, INM, soilmicroorganisms-plant<br />

interactions


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

The L*, b* and h* values <strong>of</strong> pomegranate colour were found to decrease while, a* and c* values<br />

increased with different nutrient management practices. The L*, b* and h* values decreased i.e.<br />

77.35, 2.33 and 24.42 significantly with the application <strong>of</strong> INM (FYM + Solubilizers + RDF)<br />

+Umber (Ficus racemosa) Rhizosphere Hybridized Soil over control and followed by INM<br />

(FYM + Solubilizers +RDF) +Antibiotics with values 80.01, 2.64 and 26.21, respectively.<br />

However, a* and c* values were increased to 13.91 and 10.40 with treatment T7 followed by<br />

treatments T6 with values 12.43and 9.96, respectively.<br />

Leaf nitrogen (2.47 and 2.53 %), phosphorus (0.26 and 0.28 %) and potassium concentration<br />

(1.33 and 1.34 %) were increased with INM (FYM + Solubilizers+ RDF) + Umber (Ficus<br />

racemosa) Rhizosphere Hybridised Soil which was statistically at par with INM (FYM +<br />

Solubilizers + RDF) + Antibiotics and Antibiotics (Streptocycline) + RDF) at flowering and after<br />

harvest, respectively. While, it was decreased with absolute control.<br />

Conclusion<br />

Yield <strong>of</strong> pomegranate and quality parameters (TSS, titrable acidity and colour <strong>of</strong> juice) were<br />

improved with application <strong>of</strong> INM (FYM @ 15 kg per tree, Azotobacter @ 8 ml per tree, PSB @<br />

8 ml per tree and Trichoderma @ 100 g per tree, 625:250:250 g N, P2O5 and K2O per tree) along<br />

with Umber (Ficus racemosa) Rhizosphere Hybridised Soil (URHS) @ 25 kg per tree.<br />

Pomegranate leaf nutrient concentration like total N, P and K were also increased with same<br />

treatment.<br />

References<br />

A.O. A. C. 1975. Official Methods <strong>of</strong> analysis. Association <strong>of</strong> Official Analytical Chemist. 12 th<br />

edition, Washington D. C.<br />

A. O. A. C. 1980 Official methods <strong>of</strong> analysis <strong>of</strong> the analytical chemists, 13 th ed. (W. Horwitz,<br />

ed). Association <strong>of</strong> Official Analytical Chemists 83: 617-623.<br />

Aaby, K., Skrede, G. and Wrolstand, R. E. 2005. Phenolic composition and antioxidants<br />

activities in flesh and achenes <strong>of</strong> strawberries (Frageria ananassa). Journal <strong>of</strong><br />

Agricultural Food Chemistry 53: 4032-4040.<br />

Bhargava, B. S. and Dhandar, D. S. 1987. Leaf sampling technique in pomegranate. Progressive<br />

Horticulture. 19 (3/4): 196-99.<br />

Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming,<br />

INM, soil-microorganisms-plant interactions<br />

485 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Effect <strong>of</strong> Integrated Nutrient Management on total soluble suga (TSS) and titrable acidity<br />

<strong>of</strong> pomegranate juice<br />

Treatments TSS ( 0 Brix) Titrable acidity (%)<br />

Pooled<br />

Pooled<br />

Absolute Control 10.23 0.48<br />

Farmer’s practices (1/2 RDF) 10.42 0.45<br />

RDF (625:250:250 g N P 2O 5, K 2O tree -1 ) 11.00 0.43<br />

INM (FYM + Solubilizers+ RDF) 11.61 0.40<br />

RDF + Antibiotics (Streptocycline) 12.69 0.32<br />

T 4 + Antibiotics 12.75 0.31<br />

T 4 + Umber (Ficus racemosa) Rhizosphere<br />

Hybridised Soil (URHS) 13.45 0.28<br />

Average 11.74 0.38<br />

S.Em.± 0.34 0.03<br />

CD at 5% 0.97 0.09<br />

Total N. P and K<br />

concentration<br />

Total N, P and K concentration (%)<br />

6<br />

4<br />

2<br />

0<br />

Category Category 1 Category 2 Category 3 4<br />

Treatments<br />

Series 1<br />

Series 2<br />

Series 3<br />

Effect <strong>of</strong> INM on leaf N, P and K content <strong>of</strong> Pomegranate<br />

486 | Page Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming, INM, soilmicroorganisms-plant<br />

interactions


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

T4-20P-1094<br />

Effect <strong>of</strong> Long Term Fertilization on Yield and Chemical Properties <strong>of</strong> Soil in<br />

Soybean-Safflower Croping Sequence in dryland condition under Vertisol<br />

Bhagyaresha R. Gajbhiye and Ramprasad N. Khandare<br />

AICRP on Long Term Fertilizer Experiment<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Soil Science and Agricultural Chemistry Vasantrao Naik Marathwada Krishi Vidyapeeth,<br />

Parbhani (M. S.)-431402, India<br />

Long term experiments are the primary source <strong>of</strong> information to determine the effect <strong>of</strong> cropping<br />

systems or sequences, soil management, fertilizer use and residue utilization on changes in<br />

organic carbon (Leigh and Johnston, 1994). These are usually the only sources <strong>of</strong> information to<br />

determine agricultural sustainability. Soyabean has become an important oilseed crop in India in<br />

a very short period with 113.98 lakh ha area under its cultivation during kharif 2019-20. The<br />

major soyabean growing states are Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra, Rajasthan, Karnataka, and<br />

Telangana. Safflower (Carthamus tinctorius), another important oilseed crop <strong>of</strong> India, is<br />

cultivated in the winter (rabi) season from September /October to February /March. India<br />

accounts for 41% (0.3 Mha) <strong>of</strong> world area under safflower. Because <strong>of</strong> low yield (630 kg ha -1 ),<br />

safflower production <strong>of</strong> merely 0.19 Mha is only 29% <strong>of</strong> global production followed by that in<br />

the US (17%), Argentina (13%), and Kazakhastan (12%).<br />

Methodology<br />

Composite soil samples <strong>of</strong> 0-15 cm depths were collected from individual plots after harvesting<br />

<strong>of</strong> the crop. The collected soil samples were thoroughly mixed and brought to the laboratory, air<br />

dried, ground with wooden mortar and pestle and sieved through 2 mm sieve, for analyzing<br />

organic carbon, available N, P and K. Organic carbon was assessed by Walkey and Black’s rapid<br />

titration method as suggested by Piper (1966). Available nitrogen was determined by using<br />

alkaline potassium permanganate method suggested by Subbiah and Asija (1956). Available<br />

phosphorus was determined by using 0.5 M sodium bicarbonate (pH 8.5) as an extractant and<br />

measured spectrophotometrically by using 420 nm wave lengths as outlined by Olsen et al.<br />

(1954). Available potassium was estimated by using normal neutral ammonium acetate as an<br />

extractant and extractant was subscribed to Flame photometer Jackson (1973).<br />

Results<br />

The results indicated that treatment 100% NPK + FYM @ 5 t ha -1 recorded highest grain (14.17<br />

and 6.31q ha -1 ) and straw yield (30.02 and 34.44 q ha -1 ) <strong>of</strong> soybean and safflower, respectively<br />

Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming,<br />

INM, soil-microorganisms-plant interactions<br />

487 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

which was found significantly superior over all the treatments and statistically at par with 100%<br />

NPK, 150% NPK, 100% NPK+HW, 100% NPK+ Zn and 100% NPK -S. The lowest grain and<br />

straw yield were recorded in absolute control followed by 100% N alone treatment in both crops.<br />

The highest soil organic carbon (7.04 g ha -1 ) was noticed in the treatment receiving 100% NPK<br />

along with 5-ton FYM over the control. However, the lowest organic content was with absolute<br />

control (5.51 g ha -1 ) followed by fallow (5.65 g ha -1 ). Maximum available N, P and K were<br />

recorded in 100% NPK + FYM @ 5 t ha -1 (282.28, 19.39 and 800.14 kg ha -1 , respectively) and<br />

was comparable with 150% NPK. Whereas, the lowest available N, P and K were recorded in<br />

absolute control followed by fallow.<br />

Conclusion<br />

Application <strong>of</strong> 100% NPK + FYM @ 5tha -1 recorded highest grain and straw yield <strong>of</strong> both<br />

soybean and safflower crops in soybean-safflower cropping sequence. After harvest <strong>of</strong> crop,<br />

treatment wise soil samples were analysed and it was found that organic carbon, available N, P<br />

and K were recorded maximum in 100% NPK + FYM @ 5 t ha -1 .<br />

References<br />

Jackson, M.L. 1973. Soil Chemical Analysis. Prentice, Hall <strong>of</strong> Indian Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi. 498.<br />

Leigh, R. A. and Johnston, A. E. 1994. Long-term Experiment in Agricultural and Ecological<br />

Sciences. CAB International. Wallingford. U.K. 428.<br />

Olsen, S.R., Cole, C.V., Watanabe, F.S. and Dean, L.A. 1954. Estimation <strong>of</strong> available<br />

phosphorus in soil by extraction with sodium bicarbonate. U. S. department <strong>of</strong><br />

Agriculture Circular. 939.<br />

Subbiah, B.V. and Asija, G.L. 1956. A rapid procedure for the estimation <strong>of</strong> Available Nitrogen<br />

in Soil. Curr. Sci., 25:259-260.<br />

Walkley, A.J. and Black, I.A. 1934. Estimation <strong>of</strong> soil organic carbon by chromic acid titration<br />

method. Soil Sci., 37: 29-38.<br />

488 | Page Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming, INM, soilmicroorganisms-plant<br />

interactions


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Effect <strong>of</strong> long term fertilization on chemical properties <strong>of</strong> soil in soybean-safflower croping<br />

sequence<br />

Treatment No.<br />

OC<br />

(g kg -1 )<br />

Available N<br />

(Kg ha -1 )<br />

Available P<br />

(Kg ha -1 )<br />

Available K<br />

(Kg ha -1 )<br />

50% NPK 6.39 245.20 15.79 650.71<br />

100% NPK 6.62 255.00 17.31 697.97<br />

150% NPK 6.74 268.15 19.04 757.38<br />

100% NPK+HW 6.64 256.49 17.53 671.53<br />

100% NPK+Zn 6.57 261.03 17.57 697.49<br />

100% NP 5.79 242.51 16.52 667.87<br />

100% N 5.74 241.03 10.98 634.46<br />

100% NPK+FYM @ 5 t ha -1 7.04 282.28 19.39 800.14<br />

100% NPK-Sulphur 6.23 250.13 16.36 670.07<br />

Only FYM @ 10t ha -1 6.80 260.25 17.71 747.17<br />

Absolute Control 5.51 227.33 10.35 622.55<br />

Fallow<br />

5.65 234.60 15.62 647.37<br />

S.E. ± 0.28 7.31 0.68 25.99<br />

C.D. at 5% 0.81 21.06 1.95 74.82<br />

Initial 5.50 216.00 16.00 766.00<br />

T4-21P-1098<br />

Effect <strong>of</strong> Foliar Application <strong>of</strong> DAP on Yield, Quality and Nutrient Uptake <strong>of</strong><br />

chickpea Under Dryland Conditions<br />

I. R. Bagwan*, Archana B. Pawar, Shubhangi R. Kadam, N. J. Ranshur and<br />

V. M. Amrutsagar<br />

Zonal Agricultural Research Station, 97, Raviwarpeth, near DAV College, KrushakBhavan, Solapur<br />

413002, Maharashtra<br />

* ikbalbagwan97@gmail.com<br />

A Field experiment was conducted at Dry Farming Research Station, Solapur in order tostudythe<br />

foliar application <strong>of</strong> diammonium phosphate (DAP) on grain, stover yields, quality and nutrient<br />

uptake <strong>of</strong> chickpea var Vijay under dryland conditionduring year 2013-14 to 2019-20 on medium<br />

deep black soil. Results revealed that the application <strong>of</strong> general recommended dose <strong>of</strong> fertilizers<br />

Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming,<br />

INM, soil-microorganisms-plant interactions<br />

489 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

(25:50 kg/ha N:P2O5 + 5t/ha FYM) along with 2% diammonium phosphatefoliar spray at 50 per<br />

cent pod setting stage(60 to 65 DAS) registered significantly highest grain and stover yield<br />

(15.51 and 18.92 q/ha), moisture use efficiency (6.66 kg/ha/mm), protein yield (291.62 q/ha),<br />

total nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium uptake (64.75, 10.27 and 66.58 kg/ha, respectively) by<br />

chickpea at harvest, as well as highest net returns ( Rs. 56920/-) and B:C ratio (2.80) over rest <strong>of</strong><br />

the treatments.<br />

Chickpea (Cicerarientinum L.) is an important pulse crop <strong>of</strong> the semiarid tropicsparticularly in<br />

rainfed ecology <strong>of</strong> Indian subcontinent. It is the main source <strong>of</strong> dietary protein formajority <strong>of</strong><br />

Indian population. The average productivity <strong>of</strong> chickpea is about 823 kg/ha in India and that<br />

<strong>of</strong>Maharashtra is 614 kg/ha. The causes for low yield <strong>of</strong> chickpea are physiological factors such<br />

as insufficientpartitioning <strong>of</strong> assimilates, poor pod setting, excessive flower abscission and lack<br />

<strong>of</strong> nutrientsduring the critical growthstages <strong>of</strong> crop. The nutrients applied through soil<br />

application are not available to plants due to losses by leaching, denitrification or volatilization.<br />

The losses in nutrients can be reduced by foliar application or foliar nutritionto plants by<br />

applying liquid fertilizer directly to their leaves. The diammonium phosphate (DAP) is the<br />

world's most widely used phosphatic fertilizer as a excellent source <strong>of</strong>phosphorus and nitrogen<br />

for plant nutrition.The experiment was conducted at ZARS, Solapur to study effect <strong>of</strong><br />

foliarapplication <strong>of</strong> DAP at different growth stages on yield, quality and nutrient uptake<strong>of</strong><br />

Chickpea under dryland conditions.<br />

Methodology<br />

Theexperiment was laid out in a randomized block design (RBD), with six treatments and four<br />

replications. The treatments are T1: Absolute control, T2: GRDF (25:50 N:P2O5 kg/ha+5<br />

t/haFYM), T3: GRDF + 2% DAP foliar spray at first flower, T4: GRDF + 2% DAP foliarspray at<br />

50% flowering, T5: GRDF + 2% DAP foliar-spray at 50% pod set, T6:GRDF+2% DAPfoliar<br />

spray at the end <strong>of</strong> podding. The FYM was incorporated in the soil and theN and P was<br />

uniformly applied to each plot as a basal dose during all the years <strong>of</strong> theexperiment. The seed <strong>of</strong><br />

chickpea variety Vijay was sown in line with 30 x 10 cm spacing. The initial soil properties <strong>of</strong><br />

the experimentalplot were pH (1:2.5)7.5, electrical conductivity0.30 dS/m, organiccarbon 0.50%,<br />

Available nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium (155,12.70 and 550 kg/ha), field capacity 212<br />

mm, permanent wilting point 80 mm. The standard analytical methods were used for analysis <strong>of</strong><br />

soil and plant samples. The data obtained in respect <strong>of</strong> the observations wasstatistically analysed<br />

by using the procedures given by Panse and Sukhatme (1985).<br />

490 | Page Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming, INM, soilmicroorganisms-plant<br />

interactions


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Results<br />

The effect <strong>of</strong> foliar application <strong>of</strong> DAP at different growth stages <strong>of</strong> chickpea showedsignificant<br />

effect on grain and stover yield, moisture use efficiency and protein yield. The results revealed<br />

that treatment GRDF along with 2 % DAP foliar spray at 50 per cent pod setting stageshowed<br />

significantly higher grain and stover yield (15.51 and 18.92 q/ha) moisture use efficiency (6.66<br />

kg/ha/mm) and protein yield (291.62 q/ha), respectively over rest <strong>of</strong> treatments.However,MUE<br />

was at par with GRDF along with 2 % DAP foliar spray at 50 per centflowering stageSimilar<br />

grain and protein yield response <strong>of</strong> foliar application <strong>of</strong> different water-soluble fertilizers were<br />

also reported by Takankharet al. (2017), Eliset al. (2020) and Deshmukh et al. (2022) in<br />

chickpea. Treatment GRDF along with 2 per centdiammonium phosphate foliar spray at 50 %<br />

pod setting stagerecorded significantly higher N, P and K uptake (64.75,10.27 and 66.58<br />

kg/ha).Similar nutrient uptake studies were taken byDeshmukh et al. (2022) in chickpea.The<br />

treatment GRDF + 2 % DAP foliar spray at 50 per cent pod setting stage <strong>of</strong>chickpea showed<br />

significantly higher available N, P2O5 and K2O (176.38,16.14 and 546.50 kg/ha)respectively over<br />

control treatment.The treatment GRDF along with 2 per cent DAP foliar spray at 50 per cent pod<br />

setting stage<strong>of</strong> chickpea recorded highest net returns (Rs. 56,920 /- andB: C ratio (2.80) over rest<br />

<strong>of</strong>the treatments.<br />

Conclusion<br />

The application <strong>of</strong> recommended dose <strong>of</strong> N and P2O5 (25:50 kg/ha) along with 5 t FYM along<br />

with 2 per cent foliar spray <strong>of</strong> diammonium phosphate (DAP) is at 50 per cent pod setting stage<br />

was found to be superior for achievinghigher yield and monitory returns <strong>of</strong> chickpea under<br />

scarcity zone <strong>of</strong> Maharashtra<br />

References<br />

Deshmukh M., Jangilwad, M. D., Mundhe, S. S., Gupta, A., Kausadikar, H. K. 2022. Impact <strong>of</strong><br />

foliar application <strong>of</strong> specialty fertilizer on growth, yield, quality and macro and micro<br />

nutrient uptake <strong>of</strong> chickpea. Int. J. Cur.Microbiol. Appl. Sci.,11(09): 261-275.<br />

Elis, S., Ipekesen, S., Basdemir, F., Tunc, M., Bicer, T.B. 2020. Effect <strong>of</strong> different fertilizer<br />

forms on yield and yield components <strong>of</strong> chickpea varieties. Int. J. Agric. Environ. Food<br />

Sci.,4 (2): 209 – 215.<br />

Panse, V. G. and Sukhatme, P. V. 1985.Statistical methods for agricultural workers. ICAR, New<br />

Delhi<br />

Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming,<br />

INM, soil-microorganisms-plant interactions<br />

491 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Takankhar, V. G., Karanjikar, P. N. and Bhoye, S. R. 2017. Effect <strong>of</strong> foliar nutrition on growth,<br />

yield and quality<strong>of</strong> chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Asian J. Soil Sci., 12(2):296-299.<br />

Effect <strong>of</strong> foliar application <strong>of</strong> DAP on yield (q/ha) Protein yield and MUE <strong>of</strong>chickpea<br />

(Pooled mean)<br />

Treatment details<br />

Yield (q/ha)<br />

Grain<br />

Stover<br />

MUE<br />

(kg/ha/mm)<br />

Protein yield<br />

(kg/ha)<br />

T 1: Absolute control 8.28 9.64 3.71 148.75<br />

T 2: GRDF (25:50 N:P2O5 kg/ha + 5t/ha FYM 12.40 15.09 4.80 226.33<br />

T 3: GRDF+ 2% DAP foliar spray at first flower 13.68 16.76 5.63 254.25<br />

T 4: GRDF+ 2% DAP foliar spray at 50 % flowering 14.32 17.36 6.22 265.67<br />

T 5: GRDF+ 2% DAP foliar spray at 50 % pod set 15.51 18.92 6.66 291.62<br />

T 6: GRDF+ 2% DAP foliar spray at the end <strong>of</strong><br />

podding<br />

13.30 16.41 5.81 249.72<br />

SE ± 0.31 0.49 0.29 7.12<br />

CD @0.05 0.92 1.45 0.84 21.16<br />

T4-22P-1100<br />

Effect <strong>of</strong> Sulphur Levels and FYM on Yield, Oil Content and Nutrient Uptake<br />

<strong>of</strong> Safflower under Dryland Condition<br />

Shubhangi Kadam*, Archana Pawar, I.R. Bagwan, N.J. Ranshur and V.M. Amrutsagar<br />

Zonal Agricultural Research Station, 97, Raviwarpeth, near DAV College, Krushak Bhavan, Solapur<br />

413002, Maharashtra<br />

*shubhangipatil2612@gmail.com<br />

Safflower (Carthamustinctorius L.) is the crucial annual oilseed crop grown in rabiseason and<br />

occupies 0.64 lakh ha with productivity <strong>of</strong> 694 kg/ha in India during the year 2021-22. Sulphur<br />

fertilization influences the composition <strong>of</strong> the oil. Sulphur fertilization with an adequate supply<br />

<strong>of</strong> nitrogen and phosphorous accelerate the metabolic pathway <strong>of</strong> linolenic acid synthesis as it<br />

results in a large decrease in the percentage <strong>of</strong> stearic acid, oleic and linoleic acid with<br />

concurrent increase in the content <strong>of</strong> linolenic acid. FYM is a store house <strong>of</strong> several macro and<br />

micronutrients which are released during the process <strong>of</strong> mineralization and stimulated the<br />

activity <strong>of</strong> microorganism that make the plant nutrients readily available to the crop (Rasool et.<br />

al. 2013). Mineralization <strong>of</strong> organic matter releases sulphur in the available form to the plant and<br />

plant absorb sulphur mostly through roots in the form <strong>of</strong> sulphate (Singh et. al. 2001). In view <strong>of</strong><br />

492 | Page Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming, INM, soilmicroorganisms-plant<br />

interactions


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

these, the present investigation was carried out to study the effect <strong>of</strong> sulphur levels and FYM on<br />

yield, oil content and nutrient uptake <strong>of</strong> safflower under dryland condition.<br />

Methodology<br />

The experiment was laid out in RBD, with seven treatments combinations which were replicated<br />

four times and compared with the recommended dose. FYM as per the treatment was<br />

incorporated in the soil and the N and P was uniformly applied to each plot as a basal dose<br />

during both the years <strong>of</strong> the experiment. Sulphur was applied through elemental sulphur. The<br />

seeds <strong>of</strong> safflower variety SSF708 was line sown spaced at 45x20 cm. The standard analytical<br />

methods were used for analysis <strong>of</strong> soil and plant samples. The data obtained in respect <strong>of</strong> the<br />

observations was statistically analyzed by using the procedures given by Panse and Sukhatme<br />

(1985).<br />

Results<br />

Grain, straw, MUE, oil yield and oil content<br />

The study revealed that, GRDF along with sulphur40 kg/ha recorded significantly higher grain,<br />

straw, oil yield and oil content (15.83 and 38.42 q/ha, 6.30 kg/ha/ mm, 500.3 kg/ha and 31.60 %)<br />

over rest <strong>of</strong> the treatments. Increased in yield to be associated with release <strong>of</strong> nutrients during<br />

microbial decomposition. Kumar et al., (2009) reported that, use <strong>of</strong> organic manures along with<br />

inorganic fertilizers attribute to higher availability and adsorption <strong>of</strong> nutrients. Thirumelai and<br />

Khalak (1993) reported that, increase in stover yield in soybean might be due to supply <strong>of</strong><br />

essential mineral nutrients in balanced amount which resulted in better growth and development<br />

<strong>of</strong> plants.<br />

Nutrient uptake<br />

The pooled data regarding total nutrient uptake revealed that the treatment GRDF along with<br />

sulphur 40 kg/ha recorded significantly higher total nutrient uptake (41.56, 17.37 and 94.15<br />

kg/ha N, P and K) over the rest <strong>of</strong> treatment.<br />

Conclusion<br />

The application <strong>of</strong> recommended dose <strong>of</strong> NPK 50:25:00 kg ha -1 + FYM 1 tha -1 with sulphur 40<br />

kg ha -1 recorded significantly higher grain and stover yield (15.83 and 38.42 q ha -1 ) over rest <strong>of</strong><br />

the treatments.<br />

Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming,<br />

INM, soil-microorganisms-plant interactions<br />

493 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

References<br />

Kumar, R.P., Singh, O.N., Singh, Y., Dwivedi, S. and Singh, J.P., 2009. Effect <strong>of</strong> integrated<br />

nutrient management on growth, yield, nutrient uptake and economics <strong>of</strong> French bean<br />

(Phaseolus vulgaris). Indian J. Agric. Sci., 79(2): 122-128.<br />

Panse, V.G. and Sukhatme, P.V., 1985. Statistical methods for agricultural workers. ICAR, New<br />

Delhi.<br />

Rasool, F., Hasan, B., Aalum, I. and Gaine, S.A. 2013. Effect <strong>of</strong> nitrogen, sulphur and farmyard<br />

manure on growth dynamics and yield <strong>of</strong> sunflower (Helianthus annus L.) under temperate<br />

conditions. Sci. Res. Essays. 8(43): 2144-2147.<br />

Singh, V., Galande, M.K., Deshpande, M.B. and Nimbkar, N. 2001. Inheritance <strong>of</strong> wilt<br />

(Fusarium oxysporumf. sp. carthami) resistance in safflower. In proceedings <strong>of</strong> the 5 th<br />

International Safflower Conference, Williston, ND, and Sidney, MT, July: 23- 27.<br />

Thirumelai, M. and Khalak, A. 1993. Fertilizer application economics in French bean. Current<br />

Research University <strong>of</strong> Agricultural Sciences, Bangalore. 22(3-5): 67-69.<br />

Effect <strong>of</strong> GRDF and sulphur levels on nutrients uptake (kg/ha) <strong>of</strong> safflower under dryland<br />

Treatment details<br />

agriculture (pooled mean)<br />

Nutrients uptake (kg/ha)<br />

N P K<br />

Absolute Control 22.81 7.50 49.84<br />

GRDF (50:25:00 kg/ha N:P 2O 5:K 2O +1 t/ha FYM) 27.95 9.47 64.07<br />

GRDF + Sulphur 10 kg/ha 32.37 10.70 74.07<br />

GRDF + Sulphur 20 kg/ha 34.83 13.29 82.53<br />

GRDF + Sulphur 30 kg/ha 37.14 15.15 88.63<br />

GRDF + Sulphur 40kg/ha 41.56 17.37 94.15<br />

GRDF + Sulphur 50 kg/ha 39.18 16.03 90.60<br />

SE+ 0.84 0.51 1.98<br />

CD @0.05 2.48 1.49 5.82<br />

494 | Page Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming, INM, soilmicroorganisms-plant<br />

interactions


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

T4-23P-1114<br />

Changes in Soil Fertility Status after Long Term Application <strong>of</strong> Integrated<br />

Nutrient Management in Direct Seeded Rice-Field Pea Cropping System<br />

T. Chandrakar 1 , A. K. Thakur 1 , A. K. Kerketta 1 , A. Pradhan 1 , G. Ravindra Chary 2 ,<br />

K. A. Gopinath 2 and B. Narsimlu 2<br />

1 SG College <strong>of</strong> Agriculture & Research Station, Indira Gandhi Krishi Vishwavidylaya, Jagdalpur,<br />

Chhattisgarh-494001<br />

2 Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, Hyderabad<br />

India ranks second in the world for rice production involving high yielding rice varieties with<br />

intensive agriculture involving huge amount <strong>of</strong> nutrient removal. It can be seen that increase in<br />

application <strong>of</strong> inorganic nutrient sources cause the soil to deteriorate in terms <strong>of</strong> soil fertility.<br />

Application <strong>of</strong> organic sources <strong>of</strong> nutrients along with fertilizers has improved soil properties as<br />

well as maintained good soil health besides improving the availability <strong>of</strong> nutrients to plants and<br />

hence productivity also.<br />

Methodology<br />

A long-term field experiment has been conducted sincekharif 2014 at long term field trial <strong>of</strong><br />

dryland farm <strong>of</strong> Shaheed Gundadhur College <strong>of</strong> Agriculture and Research Station, Jagdalpur,<br />

Chhattisgarh. The experiment was conducted in a random bock design with twelve treatments<br />

(see table for treatment description) replicated four times. Soil organic carbon, available N, P and<br />

K were determined in the laboratory by standard procedures after rabi harvest <strong>of</strong> 2021-22.<br />

Results<br />

After a span <strong>of</strong> seven years <strong>of</strong> continuous cropping <strong>of</strong> rice- field pea with different treatments,<br />

significant variations in organic carbon status was observed. There was a 6-7.5 % increases in<br />

organic matter in treatments where FYM were given @ 5 t/ha as compared to initial (within the<br />

span <strong>of</strong> 7 years). The results were supported by findings <strong>of</strong> Zhao and Zhou (2011). Combined<br />

application <strong>of</strong> FYM and inorganic fertilizers exhibited significant effect on the soil available<br />

nitrogen. The highest amount (284 kg ha -1 ) <strong>of</strong> available nitrogen was estimated in 100% NPK+5<br />

t FYM(T6) followed by 281 kg ha -1 in 50% NPK+5 t FYM+ ZnSO4@25kg ha -1 (T11). The lowest<br />

value <strong>of</strong> (184 kg ha -1 ) available nitrogen in 100% PK (T3) was due to mining <strong>of</strong> available<br />

nitrogen for long period. Increase in available nitrogen is mainly attributed to direct addition <strong>of</strong><br />

FYM. The conditions promoting mineralization <strong>of</strong> nutrients are favorable organic carbon<br />

content, porosity, C: N ratio, water holding capacity, microbial activity etc. All these conditions<br />

Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming,<br />

INM, soil-microorganisms-plant interactions<br />

495 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

lead to convert unavailable form <strong>of</strong> nitrogen to available form and provide higher available<br />

nitrogen. There would be 26.7 % more available nitrogen after seven years <strong>of</strong> cropping<br />

under100% NPK+5 t FYM (T6) compared to initial. The results are in support with the<br />

estimations <strong>of</strong> Satish et al. (2011).<br />

The available phosphorus among treatments rangedfrom 17.67 (T1) to 29.68 kg ha -1 (T3)\.The<br />

maximum value <strong>of</strong> available phosphorus was recorded in 100% PK (T3). Statistically significant<br />

increase in available phosphorus was recorded among the treatments compared to its initial value<br />

<strong>of</strong> available soil phosphorus. There were increases in available soil phosphorus in all the<br />

treatments where phosphorus was applied. But highest increase was estimated in100% PK (T3)<br />

with 28 % more followed byT5 (100% NP) as compared to initial P status. The results were<br />

supported by findings <strong>of</strong> Walia et al. (2010).<br />

Effect <strong>of</strong> inorganic and organic sources <strong>of</strong> nutrient application in direct seeded rice-field<br />

pea cropping system on soil fertility under rainfed midland situation<br />

Treatment<br />

Organic<br />

C (%)<br />

Av. nutrients (kg/ha)<br />

N P K<br />

Initial values (at the start <strong>of</strong> expt. 2014-15) 0.67 224.6 23.18 154<br />

T1-Control 0.65 199.4 17.67 144<br />

T2-100% NPK 0.69 247.2 26.84 168<br />

T3-100% PK 0.64 184.4 29.68 180<br />

T4-100% NK 0.63 221.8 20.27 176<br />

T5-100% NP 0.65 225.2 28.69 139<br />

T6-100% NPK+5 t FYM 0.71 284.6 27.65 189<br />

T7-100% NPK+5 t FYM+ ZnSO 4@25kg 0.72 280.4 26.32 184<br />

T8-100% NPK+5 t FYM+ ZnSO 4@25kg ha -1 + Lime 3 q<br />

ha -1<br />

0.71 271.2 26.82 176<br />

T9-50% NPK 0.68 216.4 25.43 160<br />

T10-50% NPK + 5 t FYM 0.71 276.8 28.01 192<br />

T11-50% NPK + 5 t FYM+ ZnSO 4@25kg ha -1 0.72 281.2 28.71 188<br />

T12-50% NPK + 5 t FYM+ ZnSO 4@25kg ha -1 + Lime 3 q<br />

ha -1<br />

0.72 278.4 29.35 188<br />

CV(%) 8.88 18.78 12.15 16.5<br />

CD @5% 0.05 29.6 4.36 11.94<br />

496 | Page Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming, INM, soilmicroorganisms-plant<br />

interactions


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Continuous application <strong>of</strong> FYM along with fertilizers showed significant effect on soil available<br />

potassium. The range <strong>of</strong> available potassium content in soil among different treatments was 139<br />

to 192 kg ha -1 . The maximum value (192 kg ha -1 ) <strong>of</strong> available potassium content in soil was<br />

recorded in 50% NPK + 5 t FYM (T10). While the lowest value <strong>of</strong> soil available potassium (139)<br />

content was recorded in 100% NP (T5). Slight increase in the content <strong>of</strong> soil available potassium<br />

was found in the treatments comparing to the initial stage. The treatments where chemical<br />

fertilizer was applied along with FYM showed significantly high value <strong>of</strong> available potassium in<br />

soil. The organic manure along with chemical fertilizers resulted in an integrated influence on<br />

potassium availability to plant as the organic matter increase accessible adsorption sites for<br />

potassium.<br />

Conclusion<br />

The combined application <strong>of</strong> FYM along with fertilizers could enhance the soil fertility status in<br />

terms <strong>of</strong> increase in organic carbon, available N, P and K in soil.<br />

References<br />

Satish, A., Hugar, A.Y., Kusagur, N. and Chandrappa, H. 2011. Effect <strong>of</strong> integrated nutrient<br />

management on soil fertility status and productivity <strong>of</strong> rice-maize sequence under<br />

permanent plot experiment. Indian J. Agric. Res. 45 (4): 320-325.<br />

Walia, M. K., Walia, S. S. and Dhaliwal, S. S. 2010. Long term effect <strong>of</strong> integrated nutrient<br />

management <strong>of</strong> properties <strong>of</strong> typic ustochrept after 23 cycles <strong>of</strong> an irrigated rice wheat<br />

system. J. <strong>of</strong> sustainable agriculture. 34:724-743.<br />

Zhao, J. and Zhou, L. 2011. Combined Application <strong>of</strong> Organic and Inorganic Fertilizers on Black<br />

Soil Fertility and Maize Yield. J. <strong>of</strong> Northeast Agriculture University (English Edition).<br />

18(2): 24-29.<br />

Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming,<br />

INM, soil-microorganisms-plant interactions<br />

497 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

T4-24P-1130<br />

Response <strong>of</strong> Mung bean to Higher Doses <strong>of</strong> Fertilizers under Rainfed<br />

Conditions<br />

M. D. Giri*, A. N. Paslawar and N. K. Patke<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Agronomy<br />

Dr. Panjabrao Deshmukh Krishi Vidhyapeeth, Akola 444 104 (Maharashtra), India<br />

* mdgiri@pdkv.ac.in<br />

India is the largest producer <strong>of</strong> pulses in the world, with a 24% share in global production; it is<br />

also a big consumer and exporter <strong>of</strong> pulses in the world. Being an economical source <strong>of</strong> protein,<br />

high fiber content, vitamins, and minerals, along with the unique ability to restore soil health,<br />

pulses have assumed the universal remedy for sustainable production. Pulses are the major<br />

source <strong>of</strong> protein and carbohydrates in the Indian diet. The major pulse crops <strong>of</strong> India are<br />

chickpea (48%), pigeonpea (15%), mungbean (7%), urdbean (7%), lentil (5%), and field pea<br />

(5%). Mungbean (Vigna radiata) is an important pulse crop in India and is believed to be<br />

originated from India. It is a short-duration legume crop. It is traditionally grown mainly in<br />

Asian regions, while its cultivation has spread to other parts <strong>of</strong> the world recently. India<br />

contributes more than 70% <strong>of</strong> the world’s mungbean production. Mungbean is grown on more<br />

than 5.0 million ha in the country, mainly in Rajasthan, Maharashtra, Madhya Pradesh,<br />

Karnataka, Orissa, and Bihar, with a total production <strong>of</strong> 3.09 million tonnes. The average<br />

productivity <strong>of</strong> the mungbean crop is 600kg/ha. Fertilizers can increase food grain production<br />

and reduce the risk and uncertainty associated with the production <strong>of</strong> food crops. Mungbean is an<br />

important Kharif season short-duration pulse crop grown on an area <strong>of</strong> 0.90 lakh ha in the<br />

Vidarbha region <strong>of</strong> Maharashtra state. An increased fertilizer dose was observed beneficial for<br />

the mungbean crop in Vidarbha.Therefore, this study aimed to assess the impact <strong>of</strong> different<br />

doses <strong>of</strong> fertilizers, farm yard manure, and bi<strong>of</strong>ertilizers on mungbean in a rainfed environment.<br />

The experiment was conducted at Dr. Panjabrao Deshmukh Krishi Vidyapeeth, Akola<br />

(Maharashtra), India, between 2018 and 2020. The experiment was laid out in a randomized<br />

complete block design with three factors with three replications. There were three fertilizer doses<br />

(N1:75% RDF, N2:100%RDF, and N3:125% RDF),twoFYM applications (F1: Control and F2:5<br />

t/ha), and three seed treatments with bi<strong>of</strong>ertilizers (B1: Rhizobium, B2: LMn 16, and B3:<br />

Rhizobium + LMn 16).Results indicated that 125% RDF application in mungbean crops<br />

increased plant height, pods/plant, seed yield/plant, seed yield (kg/ha), and B: C<br />

ratio.Furthermore, higher doses <strong>of</strong> fertilizer increased the number <strong>of</strong> root nodules per plant and<br />

the dry weight <strong>of</strong> root nodules over other fertilizer doses.Application <strong>of</strong> the higher doses also<br />

498 | Page Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming, INM, soilmicroorganisms-plant<br />

interactions


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

resulted in the higher uptake <strong>of</strong> nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium by seed and straw <strong>of</strong><br />

mungbean. Applying FYM @ 5t/ha resulted in a significantly higher seed yield and the uptake <strong>of</strong><br />

nutrients by the mungbean. Various bi<strong>of</strong>ertilizers influenced yield parameters, seed yield, and<br />

nutrient uptake by the mungbean. We hope this research will improve mungbean yields in<br />

rainfed areas by identifying the optimal fertilizer and FYM dose.<br />

T4-25P-1143<br />

Response <strong>of</strong> Soybean Varieties to Integrated Nutrient Management under<br />

Rain-fed Condition in New Alluvial Zone <strong>of</strong> West Bengal<br />

Anusree Paul 1 , N.W.E. Lay Lay 2 and Dhananjoy Dutta 1<br />

1 Department <strong>of</strong> Agronomy, Bidhan Chandra Krishi Viswavidyalay, Mohanpur, Nadia, West Bengal, India<br />

-741 252<br />

2 Department <strong>of</strong> Agriculture, Ministry <strong>of</strong> Agriculture, Livestock and Irrigation, Myanmar<br />

Low yield <strong>of</strong> soybean in India is mainly due to lack <strong>of</strong> suitable varieties along with nutrient and<br />

moisture stresses under rain-fed condition. Therefore, it is essential to find outsuitable varieties<br />

and efficient nutrient management for improving the productivity <strong>of</strong> Kharif soybean.<br />

Methodology<br />

Afield experiment was conducted during Kharif seasons <strong>of</strong> 2019-2020 and 2020-2021 at BCKV,<br />

West Bengal, insandy loam alluvial soil (Inceptisol)with neutral pH (7.20), medium organic<br />

carbon (0.61%), low available nitrogen (191.8 kg/ha), high phosphorus (27.1 kg/ha), medium<br />

potassium (171.5 kg/ha)and low zinc (0.50 ppm)status tostudy the effect <strong>of</strong> different nutrient<br />

management practices on growth, yield and quality <strong>of</strong> soybean varieties as well as economics <strong>of</strong><br />

production in a factorial randomized block designhaving three soybean varietiessuch as V1-<br />

PS1225,V2- YEZIN 15andV3- PS24 [varieties V1 and V3(115 days duration) released from India<br />

and V2 (110 days duration) from Myanmar] as factor A and five nutrient management<br />

treatments.viz., N1- 100% RDF (N: P2O5: K2O @ 20:60:40 kg/ha), N2- 75% RDF + 3 t/ha<br />

FYM,N3- 75% RDF+ 1.5 t/ha vermicompost, N4-75% RDF + 3 t/ha FYM + 25 kg/ha ZnSO4<br />

andN5- 75% RDF + 1.5 t/ha vermicompost + 25 kg/ha ZnSO4 as factor B withthree replications.<br />

The crop was grown with a seed rate <strong>of</strong> 80 kg/ha and 45 cm × 10 cmspacing under rain-fed<br />

condition with rainfall <strong>of</strong> 1017.1 and 1077.1 mm in 2019-2020 and2020-2021 respectively during<br />

experimental period.<br />

Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming,<br />

INM, soil-microorganisms-plant interactions<br />

499 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Results<br />

Pooled data revealed that significantly taller plant (66.82 cm) with higher aerial dry matter<br />

(685.38 g/m 2 ), nodule number/plant (43.19) andseed yield (2320 kg/ha) were recorded with N5<br />

treatmentand the lowest values were obtained under N1, whereas,seed oil content(20.15%) was<br />

highest in 100%RDF.Interaction effects showed that variety PS 24 and nutrient treatment N5<br />

(V3N5)excelled others in terms <strong>of</strong> plant height (73.81 cm), aerial dry matter (767.09 g/m 2 ), nodule<br />

number/plant (51.21) and seed yield (2601kg/ha). Maximum seed oil content (21.18%) was<br />

obtained with V2N1 combination. Highest gross return (Rs.75,448/ha), net return (Rs. 42,994/ha)<br />

and benefit-cost ratio (2.32) was obtained with V3N5.<br />

Conclusion<br />

The PS 24 variety along with application <strong>of</strong> 1. 5 t/ha vermicompost plus 75% RDF and 25 ZnSO4<br />

kg/ha can be recommended for Kharif soybean under rain-fed condition in new alluvial zone <strong>of</strong><br />

West Bengal.<br />

Effect <strong>of</strong> varieties and nutrient management on growthparameters <strong>of</strong> soybean (pooled)<br />

Varieties (V)<br />

Treatments<br />

Plant height<br />

(cm)<br />

Aerial dry<br />

matter (g/m 2 )<br />

Number <strong>of</strong><br />

nodules/<br />

plants<br />

V 1 (PS 1225) 62.13 619.92 35.36<br />

V 2 (Yezin 15) 53.02 525.94 23.83<br />

V 3 (PS 24) 69.66 705.48 46.55<br />

S. Em. (±) 0.98 10.60 1.08<br />

C. D. (P= 0.05) 2.86 30.98 3.17<br />

Nutrient Management (N)<br />

N 1 (100% RDF) 55.28 550.16 26.66<br />

N 2 (75% RDF + 3 t/ha FYM) 58.76 588.11 31.59<br />

N 3 (75% RDF + 1.5 t/ha vermicompost) 64.70 644.32 38.87<br />

N 4(75% RDF + 3 t/ha FYM+ 25 kg/ha ZnSO 4) 62.46 617.59 35.93<br />

N 5 (75% RDF +1.5 t/ha vermicompost +25 kg/ha<br />

ZnSO 4) 66.82<br />

685.38 43.19<br />

S. Em. (±) 1.08 12.18 1.43<br />

C. D. (P= 0.05) 3.16 35.60 4.20<br />

Interaction (V × N)<br />

V 1N 1 53.78 526.58 22.46<br />

500 | Page Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming, INM, soilmicroorganisms-plant<br />

interactions


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

V 1N 2 58.25 591.98 31.83<br />

V 1N 3 66.00 641.60 39.74<br />

V 1N 4 63.50 633.13 36.64<br />

V 1N 5 68.68 706.32 46.14<br />

V 2N 1 47.57 469.49 15.96<br />

V 2N 2 49.26 495.92 18.84<br />

V 2N 3 57.45 551.27 27.44<br />

V 2N 4 53.37 530.32 24.70<br />

V 2N 5 58.46 582.72 32.22<br />

V 3N 1 64.49 654.42 41.57<br />

V 3N 2 67.78 676.43 44.09<br />

V 3N 3 71.68 740.13 49.44<br />

V 3N 4 70.02 689.33 46.45<br />

V 3N 5 73.81 767.09 51.21<br />

S. Em. (±) 1.18 13.67 1.61<br />

C. D. (P=0.05) 3.45 39.96 4.71<br />

T4-26P-1162<br />

Water-Soluble Fertilizers for Foliar Supplementation in Rainfed Areas<br />

S. S. Balloli*, Ch. Srinivasa Rao, Jyothi Lakshmi, Amit Srivasatava, K. Sammi Reddy and<br />

V. K. Singh<br />

ICAR-Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, Santoshnagar, Hyderabad - 500 059<br />

* ss.balloli@icar.gov.in<br />

Studies were conducted to understand whether application <strong>of</strong> water-soluble fertilizers through<br />

foliar sprays during the vegetative stage can enhance the yield <strong>of</strong> maize and whether application<br />

<strong>of</strong> micro (zinc) and beneficial elements (selenium) can help in influencing some <strong>of</strong> the plant<br />

physiological processes and in-turn help minimize the yield reduction due to drought/insufficient<br />

soil moisture.<br />

Methodology<br />

A field experiment with maize cv. DHM 117 was carried out in kharif at Gungal Research Farm<br />

(GRF) in randomized block design with nine treatments and three replications. The treatments<br />

tried were: 1) T1: recommended dose <strong>of</strong> fertilizer ie 90:45: 45 kg NPK/ha, 2) T2: T1 without top<br />

dressing <strong>of</strong> 45 kg N/ha at 25 DAS+ foliar spray <strong>of</strong> 0.5% water soluble fertilizer + 0.5% ZnSO4<br />

Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming,<br />

INM, soil-microorganisms-plant interactions<br />

501 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

+ 20g/ha <strong>of</strong> sodium selenite at 23 and 55 DAS after sowing, T3: T1+ foliar spray <strong>of</strong> 0.5% water<br />

soluble fertilizer + 0.5% ZnSO4 + 20g/ha <strong>of</strong> sodium selenite at 23 and 55 DAS after sowing, T4:<br />

T1+ foliar spray <strong>of</strong> 0.5% water soluble fertilizer + 0.5% ZnSO4 + 20g/ha <strong>of</strong> sodium selenite at<br />

55 after sowing only, T5: T1+ foliar spray <strong>of</strong> 0.5% water soluble fertilizer + 0.5% ZnSO4 +<br />

20g/ha <strong>of</strong> sodium selenite at 23 after sowing only, T6: No basal but top dressing only foliar<br />

spray <strong>of</strong> 0.5% water soluble fertilizer + 0.5% ZnSO4 + 20g/ha <strong>of</strong> sodium selenite at 23 and 55<br />

DAS, T7: T1+ foliar spray <strong>of</strong> 0.5% water soluble fertilizer at 23 and 55 DAS, T8: T1+ foliar<br />

spray <strong>of</strong> Plant Agromagic water soluble fertilizer @ 4g /L, T9: Absolute control, no fertilizers.<br />

Results<br />

Results <strong>of</strong> the field experiment revealed that application <strong>of</strong> recommended dose <strong>of</strong> fertilizer +<br />

spraying <strong>of</strong> 0.5% ZnSO4 + 20 g/ha <strong>of</strong> sodium selenite at 25 and 55 DAS resulted in highest grain<br />

yield <strong>of</strong> maize followed by treatments T4 and T5. The lowest grain yield <strong>of</strong> maize was recorded<br />

in T6 treatment where no fertilizers were applied basally but only spraying <strong>of</strong> water-soluble<br />

fertilizer, ZnSO4 and sodium selenite were taken up as compared to absolute control where no<br />

fertilizers were added indicating that the spraying <strong>of</strong> water-soluble fertilizers and micronutrients<br />

will have adverse effect on plants which are nutrient stressed. It is also evident from the Figure<br />

1 that the treatment T2 where no top dressing <strong>of</strong> 45 kg N/ha was given resulted in lower yield as<br />

compared to treatment T1 indicating that the water-soluble fertilizers can be used as a<br />

supplement to the conventional fertilizers like urea, DAP, MOP. The significant increase in the<br />

grain yield <strong>of</strong> maize in treatments receiving foliar sprays is attributed due to the increase in the<br />

uptake <strong>of</strong> nitrogen, phosphors, potassium and zinc by the maize crop. The soil test values for<br />

available N, P, K and available Zn after the harvest <strong>of</strong> the maize crop did vary significantly in the<br />

treatments studied. The total chlorophyll content was highest in T3 treatment as compared to<br />

other treatments analyzed from the plant samples collected one day after the second spraying ie<br />

on the 61st DAS indicating that spraying <strong>of</strong> water-soluble fertilizers along with micronutrients<br />

and selenium at 30 and 60 DAS has resulted in higher photosynthetic ability.<br />

Conclusions<br />

The results <strong>of</strong> the study indicate that the water-soluble fertilizers can be used as a supplement to<br />

the conventional fertilizers like urea, DAP, MOP.<br />

502 | Page Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming, INM, soilmicroorganisms-plant<br />

interactions


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

3500<br />

3000<br />

2500<br />

2000<br />

1500<br />

1000<br />

500<br />

0<br />

T1 T2 T3 T4 T5 T6 T7 T8 T9<br />

Maize yield (kg/ha) as influenced by different treatments<br />

T4-27P-1183<br />

Foliar Nutrition; a key to Integrated Nutrient Management in Vegetable<br />

Cowpea<br />

R.K. Krishnasree 1 and Sheeja K. Raj 2<br />

1 Pr<strong>of</strong>essor Jayashankar Telangana State Agricultural University, Telangana, India 500030<br />

2 Kerala Agricultural University, Thrissur, Kerala India, 680656<br />

Foliar fertilization is the term used for the application <strong>of</strong> suitable concentrations <strong>of</strong> plant<br />

nutrients on foliage <strong>of</strong> growing plants. Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata subsp. unguiculata (L.)<br />

Verdcourt), one <strong>of</strong> the widely cultivated vegetables <strong>of</strong> Kerala, is valued for its tender pods. The<br />

fertilizer schedule recommended for cowpea ends within 20 DAS (days after sowing) which is<br />

inadequate to meet the nutrient requirements <strong>of</strong> later formed flowers and pods. On the other<br />

hand, fate <strong>of</strong> soil applied nutrients is dependent on soil-nutrient interactions. Hence foliar<br />

nutritionacts as an effective means to cater to the nutrient demands <strong>of</strong> later formed flushes.<br />

Integrated nutrient management is a promising means <strong>of</strong> efficient utilization <strong>of</strong> resources and it<br />

helps in achieving higher crop productivity at lesser expense. Foliar nutrition can fit as an<br />

efficient tool into INM scheme. It eliminates nutrient wastages and produces more yield per unit<br />

nutrient applied. The present study was formulated to find out the effect <strong>of</strong> foliar nutrition <strong>of</strong><br />

water-soluble fertilizers, Zn and B in maximizing the yield <strong>of</strong> bush vegetable cowpea.<br />

Methodology<br />

The experiment was conducted during Rabi 2020 at Coconut Research Station, Balaramapuram,<br />

Kerala, India with 13 treatments in 3 replications in a randomized block design (RBD). Bush<br />

Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming,<br />

INM, soil-microorganisms-plant interactions<br />

503 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

cowpea variety Bhagyalakshmi released from Kerala Agricultural University was used for the<br />

study. At the time <strong>of</strong> second ploughing, 20 t ha -1 dried powdered FYM was applied to the<br />

treatment plots. Chemical fertilizers were applied @ 20:30:10 kg NPK ha -1 (RDF). Urea, rajphos<br />

and muriate <strong>of</strong> potash respectively were used as source <strong>of</strong> NPK for the experiment. Water<br />

soluble NPK fertilizer (19:19:19), NK fertilizer KNO3 (13.7% N and 46% K2O), zinc sulphate<br />

heptahydrate (21% Zn) and solubor (20.9% B) were used for foliar application. Seeds primed in<br />

ZnSO4 (0.05%) for 4 h were dibbled at a spacing <strong>of</strong> 30 cm x 15 cm.<br />

Results<br />

Significantly higher dry matterwas recorded by all the treatments involving foliar application<br />

compared to RDF due to the quick access <strong>of</strong> plants to nutrients (Dey et al., 2017). Better growth<br />

expression withRDF + 0.5% 19:19:19 + 0.025% solubor at 45 DAS is evident from its highest<br />

dry matter production and CGR at final harvest. This can be attributed to its significantly higher<br />

N, P and K uptake. It recorded the highest number <strong>of</strong> pods per plant, which is due to the<br />

favourable influence <strong>of</strong> B in enhancing the fruit setting percentage by promoting the germination<br />

<strong>of</strong> pollen and elongation <strong>of</strong> pollen tube (Narayanammaet al., 2009). Higher chlorophyll content<br />

in this treatment can be ascribed to the higher N content <strong>of</strong> leaves as evident from the data on N<br />

uptake. Foliar nutrition enhanced the nodule fresh weight from 0.05 to 1.35 g per plant. Zinc is<br />

actively involved in the biosynthesis <strong>of</strong> leghaemoglobin (Das et al., 2012) as evident from<br />

nodule fresh weight T4 and T6. Perusal <strong>of</strong> data on B: C ratio revealed that all the foliar<br />

application treatments registered higher B: C ratio compared to RDF. The highest B: C ratio was<br />

registered in T5 (2.26) due to higher yield.<br />

Effect <strong>of</strong> foliar nutrition on uptake <strong>of</strong> N, P and K<br />

504 | Page Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming, INM, soilmicroorganisms-plant<br />

interactions


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Effect <strong>of</strong> foliar nutrition on dry matter production at final harvest (g plant -1 ) Crop Growth<br />

Rate, CGR (g m -2 day -1 ), nodule fresh weight (g plant -1 ), number <strong>of</strong> pods per plant and B:C<br />

Treatment<br />

ratio<br />

Dry matter<br />

production at<br />

final harvest<br />

T 1 : RDF (½ N, full P and K basal and ½ N at 20 DAS) 24.69 1.53<br />

T 2 : RDF + 0.5% 19:19:19 at 45 DAS 35.28 2.23<br />

T 3 : RDF + 0.5% 19:19:19 at 45 & 60 DAS 29.55 1.68<br />

T 4 : RDF + 0.5% 19:19:19 + 0.05% ZnSO 4 at 45 DAS 31.65 1.78<br />

T 5 : RDF + 0.5% 19:19:19 + 0.025% solubor at 45 DAS 39.51 2.26<br />

T 6 : RDF + 0.5% 19:19:19 + 0.05% ZnSO 4 + solubor 0.025% at 45 DAS 34.28 2.12<br />

T 7 : RDF + 0.5% 19:19:19 + 0.05% ZnSO 4 + solubor 0.025% at 45 DAS +<br />

0.5% 19:19:19 at 60 DAS<br />

B: C<br />

ratio<br />

30.11 1.76<br />

T 8: RDF + 0.5% KNO 3 at 45 DAS 37.52 2.07<br />

T 9 : RDF + 0.5% KNO 3 at 45 & 60 DAS 32.60 1.69<br />

T 10 : RDF + 0.5% KNO 3 + 0.05% ZnSO 4 at 45 DAS 33.95 1.81<br />

T 11 : RDF + 0.5% KNO 3 + 0.025% solubor at 45 DAS 35.41 2.12<br />

T 12: RDF + 0.5% KNO 3 + 0.05% ZnSO 4 + solubor 0.025% at 45 DAS 35.61 1.90<br />

T 13 : RDF + 0.5% KNO 3 + 0.05% ZnSO 4 + solubor 0.025% at 45 DAS +<br />

0.5% KNO 3 at 60 DAS<br />

SEm (±) 1.34<br />

CD (0.05) 3.925<br />

Conclusion<br />

36.89 1.88<br />

Supplementation <strong>of</strong> major and micro nutrients through foliar feeding at 45 DAS avoided<br />

physiological stresses and contributed to higher pod yield in foliar nutrition treatments.<br />

Application <strong>of</strong> N, P, K, Zn and B was possible through foliar application at lower cost compared<br />

to individual soil application <strong>of</strong> these nutrients. Hence foliar nutrition is a key to INM in bush<br />

vegetable cowpea.<br />

References<br />

Das, S., Pareek, N., Raverkar, K.P., Chandra, R and Kaustav, A. 2012. Effectiveness <strong>of</strong> micronutrient<br />

application and Rhizobium inoculation on growth and yield <strong>of</strong> Chickpea. Int. J. Agric. Environ.<br />

Biotech., 5(4): 445- 452.<br />

Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming,<br />

INM, soil-microorganisms-plant interactions<br />

505 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Dey, S., Prasad, S., Tiwari, P and Sharma, P. 2017. Effect <strong>of</strong> urea, KCl, zinc placement and spray on<br />

growth <strong>of</strong> cowpea. J. Pharmacog. Phytochem., 6(6): 971-973.<br />

Narayanamma, M., Rani, R., Lalitha, K., Kameshwari, P. and Reddy, R.V.S.K. 2009. Effect <strong>of</strong> foliar<br />

application <strong>of</strong> micronutrients on the yield components, yield and nutrient content <strong>of</strong> bitter gourd.<br />

Orissa J. Hortic., 37(2): 1-5.<br />

T4-28P-1190<br />

Impact <strong>of</strong> Integrated Nutrient Management on Wheat (TriticumAestivumL.)<br />

in Eastern Uttar Pradesh<br />

Ambuj Kumar Singh and Ram Swaroop Meena<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Agronomy, Institute <strong>of</strong> Agricultural sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, India-<br />

221005<br />

* ambujsingh67@bhu.ac.in<br />

Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) is number one cereal <strong>of</strong> the world and is grown on the largest area.<br />

It is cultured on about 220 million hectares area in the world and delivers almost 21% <strong>of</strong> our<br />

food calories and 20% <strong>of</strong> protein for more than 4.5 million people. In India, during past three<br />

decades, intensive agriculture involving exhaustive high yielding varieties <strong>of</strong> cereals particularly<br />

wheat has led to heavy mining <strong>of</strong> nutrients from the soil. The crop removes annually large<br />

quantities <strong>of</strong> plant nutrients from soil. The number and degree <strong>of</strong> micronutrients is also<br />

increasing at fast pace because erratic, excessive and imbalanced use <strong>of</strong> chemical fertilizers has<br />

increased which causes high the demand <strong>of</strong> micronutrients for achieving higher yield. Wheat<br />

area is decreasing every year and there is a very little scope for expansion <strong>of</strong> area in future. So,<br />

there is urgent need to maintain the soil fertility for stability and sustainability in the productivity<br />

<strong>of</strong> wheat crop. There are lot <strong>of</strong> agricultural wastes like crop residues, cow dung, poultry manure<br />

and by products <strong>of</strong> agriculture-based industries like press mud, bagasses,etc. which can be<br />

recycled to soil which not only increase the chemical, physical and biological properties <strong>of</strong> soil<br />

but also improve the crop quality by balanced nutrition. The integrated nutrient management is<br />

the answer to most <strong>of</strong> the present-day problems <strong>of</strong> malnutrition <strong>of</strong> crops along with chemical<br />

pollution (Ghanshyam et al., 2010). Therefore, the present investigation was done to evaluate the<br />

effect <strong>of</strong> different combination <strong>of</strong> organic material and inorganic material on productivity <strong>of</strong><br />

wheat.<br />

506 | Page Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming, INM, soilmicroorganisms-plant<br />

interactions


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Methodology<br />

The present investigation was performed at Agriculture research farm, Institute <strong>of</strong> Agricultural<br />

Sciences (IAS), BHU, Varanasi during Rabi 2017-2018 to evaluate the effect <strong>of</strong> integrated nutrient<br />

management on wheat yield attributes in eastern Uttar Pradesh. The experiment was laid out in<br />

randomized block design having eight treatments i.e. Control (No fertilizer), 100% RDF NPK, 100%<br />

RDF NPK+ Zn +Fe, 75% RDF NPK+ Carpet waste compost+ Zn+Fe, 75%RDF NPK+Wheat straw<br />

compost+ Zn+Fe, 75% RDF NPK+Bagasse compost+ Zn+Fe ,75% RDF NPK+Paddy straw compost<br />

+ Zn+Fe, 75% RDF NPK+Pressmud compost+ Zn+Fe and was replicated thrice.<br />

Results<br />

Results indicated that among all the treatment combinations highest spike length, number <strong>of</strong> grains<br />

per spike and test weight was recorded in the treatment combination <strong>of</strong> 75% RDF NPK+ Pressmud+<br />

Zn+Fe. The minimum spike length, number <strong>of</strong> grains per spike and test weight was observed in<br />

control treatment. And among all the treatment combinations highest grain yield and straw yield was<br />

recorded in the treatment combination <strong>of</strong> 75% RDF NPK+ Pressmud+ Zn+Fe. The minimum yield<br />

was observed in control treatment.highest harvest index was also recorded for the treatment<br />

combination <strong>of</strong> 75% RDF NPK+ Pressmud+ Zn+Fe. However, the application <strong>of</strong> 75% RDF NPK+<br />

Paddy straw compost+Zn+Fe and 75% RDF NPK+ Bagases+Zn+Fegross return were found at par to<br />

each other. Amongst the treatment, the highest gross return was recorded in the treatment<br />

combination <strong>of</strong> 75% RDF NPK+ Pressmud+ Zn+Fe (72860₹ha -1 ), which was significantly higher<br />

than the other treatment combinations. The minimum gross return (35833 ₹ha -1 ) was observed in<br />

control.<br />

6000 Yield <strong>of</strong> wheat<br />

5000<br />

4000<br />

3000<br />

2000<br />

1000<br />

0<br />

Grain yield<br />

kg per ha<br />

Straw yiled<br />

kg ha<br />

harvest<br />

index (%)<br />

Impact <strong>of</strong> integrated nutrients management on yield <strong>of</strong> wheat<br />

Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming,<br />

INM, soil-microorganisms-plant interactions<br />

507 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Conclusion<br />

The present findings <strong>of</strong> the study indicated the application <strong>of</strong> 75% RDF+<br />

pressmud+Zn+Fegreatly influenced the yield along with improvement<strong>of</strong> the the yield attributes,<br />

yieldand quality <strong>of</strong> wheat in eastern UP.<br />

References<br />

Ghanshyam Kumar, R. and Jat, R.K. 2010. Productivity and soil fertility as affected by organic<br />

manures and inorganic fertilizers in greengram (Vigna radiata) - wheat (Triticum aestivum)<br />

system. Indian J. Agron. 55(1): 16-21.<br />

T4-29P-1228<br />

Effect <strong>of</strong> Integrated Nutrient Management on Growth Yield and Economics <strong>of</strong><br />

Rainfed Chickpea (CicerArietinum L.)<br />

S. M. Kurmvanshi*, R. K. Tiwari, Sudhanshu Pandey, Abhishek Soni,<br />

Satish Singh Baghel and Sonali Pandey<br />

All India coordinected Research Project on Dryland Agriculture<br />

JNKVV College <strong>of</strong> Agriculture, Rewa 486001 (M.P.)<br />

* sheshmanikurmvanshi@gmail.com<br />

Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) is world’s third most important winter season pulse crop after<br />

beans and field pea. It is grown in tropical, subtropical and temperate regions <strong>of</strong> the world. It<br />

contains high 20-22 % protein, rich in fibre, carbohydrates, vitamins and minerals (Guar et al.<br />

2010) The production <strong>of</strong> pulse crops in our county including chickpea is not enough to meet the<br />

domestic demand <strong>of</strong> the population. There is vast scope to enhance the productivity <strong>of</strong> chickpea<br />

by improved Aagronomic practices and balanced nutrient management with bio fertilizers.<br />

Fertilizers are becoming costlier and it is becoming difficult for the poor farmers with poor<br />

economic means to apply recommended doses <strong>of</strong> fertilizers. It is now well realized that to protect<br />

the soil health, judicious use <strong>of</strong> fertilizers and combination <strong>of</strong> organic and inorganic sources <strong>of</strong><br />

nutrients is beneficial. Pulses are mainly grown in marginal lands and poor productivity <strong>of</strong> the<br />

crops is mainly due to inadequate nutrient supply.<br />

Methodology<br />

The field experiment was conducted during winterseason <strong>of</strong> 2020-21 under AICRP for Dryland<br />

Agriculture, JNKVV Kuthulia farm, College <strong>of</strong> Agriculture, Rewa (M.P.) The soil <strong>of</strong> the<br />

experimental field was silty clay- loam having pH 6.78, electrical conductivity 0.41 DS/ m,<br />

508 | Page Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming, INM, soilmicroorganisms-plant<br />

interactions


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

organic carbon 0.49% available N 197.40 kg/ha, available P2O5 10.62 kg/ha and available K2O<br />

335, 20 kg/ha. The nine integrated nutrient management treatments were laid out in a<br />

randomized complete block design keeping three replications.<br />

Results<br />

The data indicate that the application <strong>of</strong> 50% RDN through fertilizer + 50% RDN through<br />

compost + Rhizobium ciceri as in T9 recorded significantly higher seed yield (11.06 q/ha) straw<br />

yield 15.48 q/ha) and harvest index 41.29%). The combined use <strong>of</strong> organic and inorganic<br />

fertilizers along with bi<strong>of</strong>erilizers has been reported not only to meet the nutrients need <strong>of</strong> the<br />

crop but also has been found to sustain large – scale productivity goals. These results are in<br />

accordance with the findings <strong>of</strong> Meena and Baldev, 2013.<br />

Amongst the integrated nutrient management treatments, T9 having (50% RDN through fertilizer<br />

+ 50% RDN through compost + Rhizobium ciceri) gave the maximum net income upto Rs.<br />

29900/ha with 2.02 B:C ratio which was followed by T2 (100% NPK through fertilizer), The net<br />

income was Rs. 20020/ha under under 100% RDN by organic source. However, the lowest net<br />

income fetched in T1 which was Rs. 7851/ha. The net income under these integrated nutrient<br />

management treatments was exactly in accordance with the increased grain yield and higher<br />

market values.<br />

References<br />

Gour, P.M., Tripathi, S., Gowda, C. L. L., Ranga Ji, Rao, V., Sharma, H. C., Pande, S. and<br />

Sharma, M. 2010. Chickpea seed production manual. Patanchera-502324, Andhra Pradesh,<br />

India, International crop research institute for the semi arid tropics. pp 28.<br />

Meena, B. S. and Baldev, R. 2013. Effect <strong>of</strong> integrated nutrient management on productivity,<br />

Soil fertility and economics <strong>of</strong> chickpea varieties in vertisol.Ann. Agric. Sci. New series.<br />

34: 225-230.<br />

Yield and economical gain from chickpea as influenced by integrated nutrient management<br />

Tr.<br />

No.<br />

Treatments<br />

Number<br />

<strong>of</strong> pods/<br />

plant<br />

Seed<br />

yield<br />

(q/ha)<br />

Straw<br />

yield<br />

(q/ha)<br />

Harvest<br />

index (%)<br />

T1 Control 36.84 6.13 11.55 35.53 1.31<br />

T2 100% NPK through fertilizer 40.36 10.33 15.00 40.80 1.98<br />

T3 100% RDN through compost 41.24 9.00 14.00 39.13 1.71<br />

T4 50% RDN trough fertilizer + 50% 40.36 8.77 13.34 39.66 1.75<br />

B:C ratio<br />

Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming,<br />

INM, soil-microorganisms-plant interactions<br />

509 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

RDN through compost<br />

T5 50% RDN through fertilizer + 25%<br />

RDN through compost<br />

T6 25% RDN through fertilizer + 50%<br />

RDN through compost<br />

T7 50% RDN through fertilizer + 25%<br />

RDN through compost + Rhizobium<br />

ciceri<br />

T8 25% RDN through fertilizer + 50%<br />

RDN through compost + Rhizobium<br />

ciceri<br />

T9 50% RDN through fertilizer + 50%<br />

RDN through compost + Rhizobium<br />

cicericicero<br />

39.56 8.43 13.75 38.00 1.73<br />

39.37 8.07 12.95 38.21 1.61<br />

40.22 9.50 14.87 38.98 1.84<br />

40.62 9.69 14.33 40.34 1.85<br />

42.06 11.06 15.48 41.29 2.02<br />

S.Em + 0.32 0.54 0.59 0.44<br />

C.D. at 5% 0.92 1.58 1.71 1.29<br />

T4-30P-1259<br />

Effect <strong>of</strong> Integrated Nutrient Management on the Growth and Yield <strong>of</strong> Mustard (Brassica<br />

Juncea (L.) Czernj. & Cosson) Under Guava (Psidium Guajaval.) based Agri-Horti System<br />

Miryala Sushma, J.P. Singh, SudhirKumar Rajpoot and Rajnish Pandey<br />

Banaras Hindu university Varanasi (UP)-221 005 India<br />

The importance and potential <strong>of</strong> rapeseed-mustard crop is well known as it is the key oilseed<br />

crop that can help in addressing the challenge <strong>of</strong> demand - supply gap <strong>of</strong> edible oil in India. India<br />

is the third largest producer <strong>of</strong> rapeseed-mustard after Canada, China and contributing to around<br />

11 % <strong>of</strong> world’s total production. Rapeseed-mustard are the second largest oilseed crops in India.<br />

In India, during 2019-20, it was grown on 6.86 million hectares with an annual production <strong>of</strong><br />

9.12 million tonnes yielding 1331 kgha -1 . Rapeseed and mustard productivity in India has risen<br />

considerably in the last eight years, from 1840 kg ha -1 in 2010-11 to 1980 kg ha -1 in 2018-19,<br />

with production jumping from 61.64 m t in 2010-11 to 72.42 m t in 2018-19. For the crop year<br />

2019-20, India's average output was 1.4 t ha -1 . Inappropriate application <strong>of</strong> chemical fertilisers<br />

degrades soil characteristics and reduces crop output.These compounds have extremely<br />

dangerous side effects, including changes in soil structure and texture, unbalanced nutrient<br />

supply to plants, pollution <strong>of</strong> land and water bodies, and decreased soil microbial<br />

activity.Integrated nutrient management is a method <strong>of</strong> improving soil fertility and plant nutrient<br />

availability by combining the best inorganic and organic fertilisers with bi<strong>of</strong>ertilizers to ensure<br />

510 | Page Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming, INM, soilmicroorganisms-plant<br />

interactions


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

crop output for the present and future.Farmyard manure improves the soil's porosity, aggregate<br />

stability, and hydraulic conductivity in addition to adding organic matter.However, when these<br />

chemicals are mixed with organic fertilisers, a balanced nutrient system that influences crop<br />

production is established. In recent years, scholars and researchers have placed a greater<br />

emphasis on organic farming as opposed to regular agriculture because it is more<br />

environmentally friendly.<br />

Methodology<br />

A field experiment was therefore conducted to know the effect <strong>of</strong> integrated nutrient<br />

management on the growth and yield <strong>of</strong> mustard (Brassica juncea (L.) Czernj. & Cosson) under<br />

guava (Psidium guajava L.) based agri-horti system at Agriculture Research farm, Rajiv Gandhi<br />

south campus Banarshindu university, Barkachha, Mirzapur, Uttar Pradesh during the rabi<br />

season <strong>of</strong> 2021 -2022. The study was carried out in a Guava (Psidium guajava) orchard with 7m<br />

x 7m spacing. The experiment was laid out in RBD with three replications <strong>of</strong> a guava based agrihorti<br />

system (fruit based agro-forestry system). In this research, seeds are sown by broadcasting<br />

method and mixed the seeds with fine sand for uniform spacingand the plants spacing is about<br />

45cm×15cm. Based on the treatment wise applied fertilisers on the research plots.<br />

Results<br />

In the present experimentation, marked influences <strong>of</strong> the application <strong>of</strong> integrated nutrients<br />

mainly this application 75% RDF+22.5 kg S+ 3.7 kg Zn +2.5 ton/ha FYM+ two spray <strong>of</strong> nano<br />

urea , FYM and nano urea caused significant variation in all growth parameters and seed<br />

yield(1493.00 kg ha -1 ) and net return(147568 kg ha -1 ) followed by the application <strong>of</strong> 75%<br />

RDF+22.5 kg S+ 3.7 kg Zn +5 ton/ha FYM+ one spray <strong>of</strong> nano urea (1290.00 kg ha -1 ) and net<br />

return(13418 kg ha -1 ) and the lowest yield was recorded in treatment control (713.33 kg ha -1 ).<br />

similar to nitrogen uptake by seed and stover, maximum total nitrogen uptake (56.57 kg ha -1 )<br />

was recorded with 75% RDF+22.5 kg S+ 3.7 kg Zn +2.5 ton/ha FYM+ two spray <strong>of</strong> nano urea<br />

and followed by 75% RDF+22.5 kg S+ 3.7 kg Zn +5 ton/ha FYM+ one spray <strong>of</strong> nano urea (48.1<br />

kg ha -1 ) and lowest nitrogen uptake was noticed in treatment control (23.55 kg ha -1 ). similar to<br />

phosphorus maximum uptake was recorded with the treatment <strong>of</strong> 75% RDF+22.5 kg S+ 3.7 kg<br />

Zn +2.5 ton/ha FYM+ two spray <strong>of</strong> nano urea (15.01 kg ha -1 ) and control recorded minimum<br />

uptake (5.9 kg ha -1 ) similar to potassium uptake by seed and stover, application <strong>of</strong> 75%<br />

RDF+22.5 kg S+ 3.7 kg Zn +2.5 ton/ha FYM+ two spray <strong>of</strong> nano urea (42.82 kg ha -1 ) and lowest<br />

potassium uptake was recorded in treatment control (17.66 kg ha- 1 ). Similar to sulphur uptake by<br />

seed and stover, application <strong>of</strong> 75% RDF+22.5 kg S+ 3.7 kg Zn +2.5 ton/ha FYM+ two spray <strong>of</strong><br />

Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming,<br />

INM, soil-microorganisms-plant interactions<br />

511 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

nano urea (11.59 kg ha -1 ) treatment was significantly higher than other treatments. Control<br />

recorded minimum total sulphur uptake (3.41 kg ha -1 ) by crop.<br />

Effect <strong>of</strong> integrated nutrient management on the seed yield and N, P, K and S nutrient<br />

uptake <strong>of</strong> mustard under guava based agri-horti system<br />

Treatment<br />

Seed<br />

yield<br />

(kg ha -1 )<br />

N total<br />

uptake<br />

(kg ha -1 )<br />

P total<br />

uptake<br />

(kg ha -1 )<br />

K total<br />

uptake<br />

(kg ha -1 )<br />

S total<br />

uptake<br />

(kg ha -1 )<br />

Cost <strong>of</strong><br />

cultivation<br />

(Rs ha -1 )<br />

Net<br />

returns<br />

(Rs ha -1)<br />

T 1 Control 713.33 23.55 5.9 17.66 3.41 32073 102095<br />

T 2100% RDF+30kg<br />

S+ 5kg Zn<br />

T 3 50% RDF+15kg S+<br />

2.5 kg Zn +2.5 ton/ha<br />

FYM+ 2 Spray <strong>of</strong> Nano<br />

urea<br />

T 4 50% RDF+15kg S+<br />

2.5 kg Zn +5 ton/ha<br />

FYM+ 1 Spray <strong>of</strong> Nano<br />

urea<br />

T 5 75% RDF+22.5 kg<br />

S+ 3.7 kg Zn +2.5<br />

ton/ha FYM+ 2 Spray<br />

<strong>of</strong> Nano urea<br />

T 6 75% RDF+22.5 kg<br />

S+ 3.7 kg Zn +5 ton/ha<br />

FYM+ 1 Spray <strong>of</strong> Nano<br />

urea<br />

T 7 100%RDF+30kg S+<br />

5kg Zn+2.5 ton/ha FYM<br />

T 8 100%RDF+30kg S+<br />

5kg Zn+ 5 ton/ha FYM<br />

1076.00 37.56 9.52 30.22 5.97 37142 122242<br />

867.00 29.56 7.43 22.83 4.43 35482 108932<br />

970.00 33.44 8.54 25.55 5.02 35789 115435<br />

1493.00 56.57 15.01 42.82 11.59 38304 147568<br />

1290.00 48.1 12.71 37.48 9.33 38288 13418<br />

1173.33 41.32 10.78 33.34 7.43 37367 127364<br />

1236.33 44.06 11.72 35.46 8.54 38272 130626<br />

C.D (P=0.05) 142.37 3.595 0.937 2.809 0.655 - -<br />

512 | Page Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming, INM, soilmicroorganisms-plant<br />

interactions


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

T4-31P-1299<br />

Effect <strong>of</strong> Integrated Nutrient Management on System Yield, Sustainable Yield<br />

Index and Soil Properties in Maize-Based Cropping System<br />

Bikram Borkotoki, Palakshi Bora, Pallab Kumar Sarma, Nikhita Kakati, Nupur Kalita,<br />

Nikhilesh Baruah, Prasanta Neog, Rekhashree Kalita, Arunjyoti Sonowal and<br />

Buddha Bora<br />

All India Coordinated Research Project for Dryland Agriculture, BN College <strong>of</strong> Agriculture, Assam<br />

Agricultural University<br />

Indian agriculture remains predominantly rainfed, covering about 60% <strong>of</strong> the country's net sown<br />

area and 40% <strong>of</strong> the total food production (Agri Odisha,2022). These high-potential rainfed areas<br />

provide us with opportunities for faster agricultural growth than irrigated areas that have reached<br />

a plateau (Agricoop,2022). Therefore, a rainfed permanent manurial trial was conducted in the<br />

upland situation at the Biswanath Chariali Center <strong>of</strong> the All India Coordinated Research Project<br />

on Dry Land Agriculture (AICRPDA), India, situated in the North Bank Plain Zone (NBPZ) <strong>of</strong><br />

Assam in Maize-Green gram-Rajmah cropping sequence with the specific objectives <strong>of</strong><br />

identifying the suitable combination <strong>of</strong> inorganic and organic sources <strong>of</strong> nutrients for sustainable<br />

cropping system and soil health management in rainfed upland situations <strong>of</strong> Assam.<br />

Methodology<br />

The experiment was conducted with the following treatments in RBD during 2015-16 to 2019-20<br />

having a gap period during 2017-18 with three replications at the experimental farm <strong>of</strong><br />

AICRPDA (26°43'27"N and 93°08'32"E, Elevation 80 m above MSL), Biswanath Chariali<br />

Centre, Assam which an acidic upland sandy loam soil under the soil odder Inceptisols. Total<br />

rainfall in the growing season <strong>of</strong> the crops (Maize-Green gram-Rajmah) were 2071.4, 2111.4,<br />

1877.8 and 1671.6 mm in 2015-16, 2016-17,2018-19 and 2019-20, respectively. The treatments<br />

are T1: Control, T2: 100%Recommended dose <strong>of</strong> fertilizer (RDF), T3: 75% RDF (inorganic) + 3 t<br />

ha -1 Vermicompost* T4: 75% RDF (inorganic) + 1 t ha -1 vermicompost* , T5: 75% RDF<br />

(inorganic) + in situ Sesbania aculeata T6: 50% RDF (inorganic) + 3 t ha -1 vermicompost*, T7:<br />

50% RDF (inorganic) + 1 t ha -1 vermicompost*, T8: 50% RDF (inorganic) + in situ Sesbania<br />

aculeata, T9: 3 t ha -1 vermicompost, T10: 1 t ha -1 vermicompost and T11: In situ Sesbania<br />

aculeata. (* In each crop)<br />

The first crop, Maize (Var. Hybrid-101), was sown in April and harvested within the first week<br />

<strong>of</strong> August. The second crop, Greengram (var. SG-1), was sown before mid-September and<br />

Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming,<br />

INM, soil-microorganisms-plant interactions<br />

513 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

harvested within Nov. The last crop Rajmah (HUR 301), was sown in the month <strong>of</strong> mid-Dec and<br />

harvested at the end <strong>of</strong> March in all the years. Surface soils (0-15 cm) were analyzed for soil<br />

Physico-chemical properties after the 4 th year sequence was conducted following stranded<br />

procedures (Jackson,1967; Dane and Top,2002). Soil microbial biomass carbon (MBC) was<br />

analyzed by chlor<strong>of</strong>orm fumigation extraction method (Vance et al., 1987).<br />

Results<br />

Four years <strong>of</strong> pooled data reveal that the highest system yield was recorded in T3(140.31q ha - 1 ),<br />

followed by T6 (127.94 q ha -1 ) and T4 (122.15 q ha -1 ), and the lowest in control T1 (70.33 q ha -1 )<br />

with corresponding B: C ratios 3.14,2.79, 2.88 and 1.81, respectively. Similarly, pooled system<br />

RWUE (kg ha -1 cm -1 ) was also found to be highest in T3 (7.34), followed by T6 (6.68) and T4<br />

(6.42), and the lowest was in control (3.69). The data was heterogeneous at a 5% significance<br />

level, and therefore transformations were made before performing pooled analysis. In<br />

transformed data also, highest system yield was found in T3 (25.971 q ha -1 ), followed by T6<br />

(23.602 q ha -1 ) which is at par with T4 (22.673 q ha -1 ) with CD values <strong>of</strong> 2.293 at a 0.05 level <strong>of</strong><br />

significance. Manure addition improved soil physical, chemical, and biological properties<br />

(discussed under the head 'soil properties), which is reflected in the system yield. Nevertheless,<br />

the Integrated supply <strong>of</strong> nutrients gave better results than sole chemical or organic management<br />

systems. The sustainable yield index was highest in T3 (0.92), followed by T6 (0.86), T4(0.77)<br />

and T7 (0.75), and the lowest was in control (0.46), indicating that the system in more sustainable<br />

when 75% RDF + 3 t vermicompost ha -1 was applied in each crop followed by 50% RDF+ 3 t<br />

vermicompost ha -1 in each crop, followed by 75% RDF +1 t vermicompost ha -1 in each crop<br />

followed by 50 % RDF+ 1 t ha -1 vermicompost in each crop.<br />

Sustainable Yield index<br />

514 | Page Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming, INM, soilmicroorganisms-plant<br />

interactions


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Effect <strong>of</strong> treatments on soil properties:<br />

a) FC, AWC, and PWP: The highest field capacity moisture content was observed in T3<br />

(26.60%), followed by T6 (25.73%) and T4 (25.44%), and the lowest was in control<br />

T1(24.28) at CD value 0.366 at 0.05 level <strong>of</strong> significance. However, moisture content at<br />

FC in T4 and T6 was non-significant. Similarly, the highest available water content was<br />

found in T3 (20.27%), followed by T6(19.03%) and T4 (18.83%), and the lowest was in<br />

control T1(17.83%) with CD value 0.530 at a 0.05 level <strong>of</strong> significance. However,<br />

moisture content at AWC in T4 and T6 was statistically at par. The moisture content at<br />

PWP was at par for all the treatments.<br />

b) Bulk Density: The lowest bulk density was recorded in T3 (1.21 Mgm -3 ), followed by T6<br />

(1.25 Mgm -3 ) and T4(1.27 Mgm -3 ), and the highest was in control T1(1.35 Mgm -3 ) with<br />

CD value 0.02 at 0.05 level <strong>of</strong> significance. However, T4 and T6 were found to be at par.<br />

c) Soil reaction: The highest pH was recorded in T3 (4.6), followed by T6 (4.54), and the<br />

lowest was in T2 (4.41) with CD 0.13 at 0.05 level <strong>of</strong> significance.<br />

d) Oxidizable Organic Carbon: The oxidizable organic carbon was found to be highest in T3<br />

(8.93 g kg -1 ), followed by T6(8.57 g kg -1 ), and the lowest was in control T1(7.30 g kg -1 )<br />

with CD value 0.14 at 0.05 level <strong>of</strong> significance<br />

e) Available N: The highest available N was found in T3(433.34 kg ha -1 ), followed by T4<br />

(426.50 kg ha -1 ), T6 (421.40 kg ha -1 ), and the lowest was in the control T1 (296.97 kg ha -<br />

1 ) with CD value 8.17 at 0.05 level <strong>of</strong> significance. T4 and T6 were statistically at par.<br />

f) Available P2O5: The highest available P2O5 was found in T3 (26.37 kg ha -1 ), followed by<br />

T4 (24.98 kg ha -1 ), T6 (24.20 kg ha -1 ), and the lowest was in control T1 (16.70 kg ha -1 )<br />

with CD value 0.91 at 0.05 level <strong>of</strong> significance. T4 and T6 were statistically at par.<br />

Effect <strong>of</strong> Treatments on Soil Microbial Biomass Carbon (MBC): The highest level <strong>of</strong> MBC<br />

was restored in T3(243.29 mg kg -1 ), followed by T4(228.62 mg kg -1 ), T6 (227.51 mg kg -1 ) and the<br />

lowest was recorded in T1(145.15 mg kg -1 ) with CD value 14.18 at 0.05 level <strong>of</strong> significance. T4<br />

and T6 were found to be statistically at par. A perusal <strong>of</strong> soil properties indicates the positive<br />

effect <strong>of</strong> Integrated Nutrient Management (INM) on soil health compared to sole organic or<br />

chemical-intensive farming.<br />

Carbon dioxide sequestration: CO2 sequestration <strong>of</strong> the surface soil was found to be highest in<br />

T3 and the lowest in T1<br />

Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming,<br />

INM, soil-microorganisms-plant interactions<br />

515 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Conclusion<br />

CO2 sequestration (t ha -1 ) <strong>of</strong> surface soils under different nutrient management systems<br />

From the above research, it can be concluded that 75% RDF + 3 t ha -1 vermicompost (in each<br />

crop) gives the highest system yield and B: C rations and sustainable yield index in Maize-<br />

Greengram- Rajmah cropping sequence in the rainfed upland situation <strong>of</strong> the NBPZ <strong>of</strong> Assam<br />

followed by 50 % RDF + 3 t ha -1 vermicompost (in each crop) which is at par with 75% RDF +<br />

1 t ha -1 vermicompost (in each crop) in terms <strong>of</strong> yield performance. However, in terms <strong>of</strong> the B:<br />

C ratio, the application <strong>of</strong> 75% RDF + 1 t ha -1 vermicompost (in each crop) is more beneficial<br />

than 50 % RDF + 3 t ha -1 vermicompost (in each crop). INM gave a better yield and soil health<br />

management result than chemical fertilization and control or sole organic cultivation <strong>of</strong> the<br />

crops. The SYI was highest, with 75 percent <strong>of</strong> the recommended dose <strong>of</strong> fertilizers with 3 t ha -1<br />

vermicompost in each crop.<br />

References<br />

Agri Odisha.2022 Website <strong>of</strong> the Department <strong>of</strong> Agriculture and Farmers' Empowerment, Govt <strong>of</strong> Odisha,<br />

accessed on 20th Oct 2022. https://agri.odisha.gov.in/sites/default/files/2021-08/RAD.pdf<br />

Agricoop.2022 Website <strong>of</strong> the Department <strong>of</strong> Agriculture and Farmers Welfare, Ministry <strong>of</strong> Agriculture<br />

and Farmers’ Welfare Govt <strong>of</strong> India, assessed on 20 th Oct 2022<br />

https://agricoop.nic.in/en/divisiontype/rainfed-farming-system/overview<br />

Dane, J.H. and Topp, G.C. (Eds.) 2002. Methods <strong>of</strong> Soil Analysis, Part 4, Physical Methods. Soil Science<br />

Society <strong>of</strong> America <strong>Book</strong> Series, No. 5, Soil Science Society <strong>of</strong> America, Madison, 1692: 98<br />

Jackson, M.L. 1967. Soil Chemical Analysis. Prentice-Hall <strong>of</strong> India Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi, 4<br />

Vance, P., Brookes, D. Jenkinson. 1987. An extraction method for measuring soil microbial biomass C,<br />

Soil Biol. Biochem. (19): 703-707<br />

516 | Page Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming, INM, soilmicroorganisms-plant<br />

interactions


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

T4-32P-1310<br />

Soil Microbial Dynamics as Influenced By Crop Residue Management<br />

Practices In Legume-Cereal Sequence<br />

Ammaji Pydi<br />

Acharya N.G. Ranga Agricultural University<br />

Agricultural College, Rajamahendravaram<br />

India has a long history <strong>of</strong> agricultural activitiesand produces a vast amount <strong>of</strong> crop residues, the<br />

annual production <strong>of</strong> crop residues in India is estimated over 500 million tons (Mt). There exists<br />

a large variability among the crops with regard to the production <strong>of</strong> crop residues. Furthermore,<br />

residueproductionhasalsoincreasedsubstantiallywith intensive agricultural practicesTheseinclude<br />

organic matter decomposition and nutrient cycling, including carbon(C) and nitrogen (N) cycling<br />

and soil aggregate formation and maintenance. Furthermore, the size <strong>of</strong> the microbial population<br />

in agricultural soils can be affected bythe availability<strong>of</strong> organic matter and<br />

managementpractices.<br />

The legume-Maize sequence is animportant cropping system followed in a large extent <strong>of</strong> area<br />

in Andhra Pradesh and Telangana states. Grain legumes were cultivated during the<br />

Kharifseason and after harvesting the economic yield the harvested remnants are either used as<br />

animal feed or else burned to clear the succeeding crop. Maize is an exhaustive crop for<br />

nutrients and responds positively toan increase in the level <strong>of</strong> nitrogen fertilizers. Furthermore,<br />

Intensive agricultural practices ignorethe addition <strong>of</strong> organicnutrient sourcesresulting in the<br />

manifestation <strong>of</strong> nutrient deficiencies. T<strong>of</strong>ormulate an ideal nutrient management strategy to<br />

increase the yields and sustain soil health, an attempt was made to know the soil microbial<br />

dynamics <strong>of</strong>with incorporation <strong>of</strong> crop residues in the legume- Maize sequence<br />

Methodology<br />

A field experiments were conducted at Agricultural College farm, Aswaraopet, Khammam<br />

(Dist.) Telangana state for two consecutive years. The investigation was carried out with an<br />

objective to find out microbial dynamics as influenced by the crop residue incorporation <strong>of</strong><br />

kharif legumes, residue management practices and the treatments consisted <strong>of</strong> three legumes,<br />

viz., cowpea, (M1) field bean (M2) and greengram (M3) as main plot treatments during the kharif<br />

season and two residue management practices viz., residue removal (I1) and residue<br />

incorporation (I2) as sub- plot treatments. Four nitrogen levels 75 kg ha -1 (N1), 150 kg ha -1 (N2), 225<br />

kg ha -1 (N3) and 300 kg ha -1 (N4) as sub- sub plot treatments allocated to maize during rabi season.<br />

Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming,<br />

INM, soil-microorganisms-plant interactions<br />

517 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

The yield <strong>of</strong> kharif legumes, growth parameters, yield and yield attributes <strong>of</strong> rabi maize were<br />

recorded. The soil samples were collected from the experimental plots for enumerating the<br />

microbial population before sowing and after harvest <strong>of</strong> different legumes, after incorporation <strong>of</strong><br />

the crop residues, before sowing <strong>of</strong> maize and after harvest <strong>of</strong> maize was estimated by following<br />

the standard dilution plate count technique by pour plate technique Nutrient agar (NA) for<br />

bacteria, Martin’s rose bengal with streptomycin sulphate agar (MRBA) for fungi, Ashby’s agar<br />

for Azotobacter, Yeast Extract Mannitol agar (YEMA) with congo red for Rhizobium were used<br />

for enumeration. The petri plates were incubated after plating at 30 0 C for two to four days and<br />

population was counted and expressed as number <strong>of</strong> cells per gram on dry weight basis for<br />

bacteria,Azotobacter and Rhizobium and cfu g -1 <strong>of</strong> soil for fungi.<br />

Results<br />

Soil microbial population as affected by different management practices<br />

Soil microbial population was assessed at three stages viz., initial, after the harvest <strong>of</strong> the kharif<br />

legumes as well as after the incorporation <strong>of</strong> legumes and after the harvest <strong>of</strong> the rabi maize. On<br />

perusal <strong>of</strong> the data presented in the figure below revealed that there was an increase in microbial<br />

population compared to the initial population during both the years <strong>of</strong> study. Improvement in soil<br />

microbial population viz., total bacteria, rhizobium, azotobacter, actinomycetes and fungi was<br />

observed over the initial population when legumes were grown in kharif.<br />

Among the legumes, maximum number <strong>of</strong> soil micro flora was observed after the harvest <strong>of</strong><br />

cowpea followed by field bean and greengram. The increase in number <strong>of</strong> soil microorganisms<br />

might be due to the abundance <strong>of</strong> the native bacteria in the soil. Similar results were also<br />

reported by George et al. (2007).<br />

518 | Page Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming, INM, soilmicroorganisms-plant<br />

interactions


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Soil microbial population as affected by different legume crops<br />

250<br />

200<br />

150<br />

100<br />

50<br />

0<br />

Total bacterial<br />

count (x 104 g-1<br />

<strong>of</strong> soil)<br />

Rhizobium<br />

count (x 104 <strong>of</strong><br />

soil)<br />

azotobacter<br />

count (x 104 g-1<br />

<strong>of</strong> soil)<br />

Actinomycetes<br />

(X 104 g-1 <strong>of</strong><br />

soil)<br />

fungal count (x<br />

104*cfu g-1<strong>of</strong><br />

soil)<br />

Initial Cowpea Fieldbean Greengram<br />

Soil microbial population as influenced by different types <strong>of</strong> legume crops<br />

Soil incorporation <strong>of</strong> legume crop residues has further improved the microbial population by two<br />

folds during first year. The maximum number <strong>of</strong> bacteria and 352 X 10 4 g -1 ) was noticed with<br />

incorporation <strong>of</strong> cowpea residues as depicted in the figure below. The improvement in soil<br />

microbial population might be due to the addition <strong>of</strong> all the residues which might have added a<br />

fair quantity <strong>of</strong> organic matter to the soil which inturn acted as a substrate for the multiplication<br />

and development <strong>of</strong> microbes either over the initial or against the residue removal during both<br />

the years.<br />

Soil microbial population as influenced by residue management practices<br />

The decreasing in trend in the entire micro flora was noticed after the harvest <strong>of</strong> rabi maize<br />

during both the years by maintaining more or less similar trend as that was observed in the initial<br />

as well as at the end <strong>of</strong> harvest <strong>of</strong> kharif crops. Increase in microbial population was seen with<br />

Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming,<br />

INM, soil-microorganisms-plant interactions<br />

519 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

the incorporation <strong>of</strong> crop residues over the removal. Further increase in microbial count was<br />

observed due to increase in level <strong>of</strong> N application. The highest total bacterial count <strong>of</strong> 333<br />

X10 4 g -1 and 352 X10 4 g -1 <strong>of</strong> soil was recorded with incorporation <strong>of</strong> cowpea crop residues with<br />

N application at 300 kg ha -1 . While the lowest count <strong>of</strong> total bacteria 61 X10 4 g -1 and 91 X10 4 g -1<br />

in first and second year, respectively was obtained in greengram with N application at 75 kg ha -1<br />

in removal <strong>of</strong> greengram residue treatments. The changes in the population <strong>of</strong> microbes in<br />

different cropping systems and sequences were well established by Yadvinder Singh et al.<br />

(2005).<br />

References<br />

George, N., Chemining, wa, Muthomi, J. W. andTheuri, S. W. M. 2007. Effect <strong>of</strong> Rhizobia<br />

inoculation and starter N on nodulation, shoot biomass and yield <strong>of</strong> grain legumes. Asian<br />

J. Plant Sci. 6(7): 1113-1118.<br />

Yadvinder Singh, Bijaysingh. and Timsina. 2005. Crop residue management for nutrient cycling<br />

and improving the soil production in rice-based cropping systems. Adv.Agron.8<br />

T4-33P-1313<br />

Response <strong>of</strong> Sweet Corn (Zea maysL.var. saccharatasturt) to Integrated<br />

Nutrient Management under Rainfed Condition<br />

P.N. Karanjikar, S.R. Kadhavane and V.G. Takankhar<br />

College <strong>of</strong> Agriculture, Latur- 413 512, Vasantrao Naik Marathwada Agricultural University, Parbhani,<br />

Maharashtra (India)<br />

The cereal, maize (Zea mays L.) ranks third in the total production after wheat and rice and it is a<br />

staple food in many countries, particularly in the tropics and subtropics. Maize is considered as<br />

the “Queen <strong>of</strong> Cereal”. Maize is a versatile product with uses ranging from industrial products to<br />

food preparations, as well as direct human consumption at the vegetative stage. Out <strong>of</strong> various<br />

specialty corns, sweet corn is a mutant type with one or more recessive alleles in homozygous<br />

condition that enable the endosperm to accumulate twice the sugar content as that <strong>of</strong> seed corn.<br />

Sweet corn is a exhaustive crop and it is harvested at milky stage and requires fertile soils for<br />

optimum production.<br />

Amongst various agricultural inputs, fertilizer is and will remain as a chief source in achieving<br />

the food production targets. For higher productivity, there is a need for the application <strong>of</strong> higher<br />

dose <strong>of</strong> fertilizers. But the increased application <strong>of</strong> high analysis fertilizers and use <strong>of</strong> high<br />

yielding cultivars demanding more secondary and micro nutrients for enhancing food grain<br />

520 | Page Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming, INM, soilmicroorganisms-plant<br />

interactions


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

production which resulted in their deficiencies. The integrated plant nutrient supply envisages<br />

conjunctive use <strong>of</strong> inorganic and organic sources <strong>of</strong> plant nutrients for crop productivity besides<br />

sustaining soil health. Application <strong>of</strong> organic materials along with inorganic fertilizers in the soil<br />

leads to sustained productivity and also vermicomposting technology involves the bioconversion<br />

<strong>of</strong> organic waste into vermicasts and vermiwash utilizing earthworms. Taking in to<br />

consideration the factors discussed, present investigation was carried out at Experimental Farm,<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Agronomy, College <strong>of</strong> Agriculture, Latur with object to study the effect <strong>of</strong><br />

integrated nutrient management on sweet corn.<br />

Methodology<br />

The experiment was laid out in a randomized block design with seven treatments and replicated<br />

thrice. The treatments were T1- 100% RDF, T2 - 100% RDF + FYM @ 5 t ha -1 , T3 - 75% RDF<br />

+ FYM @ 5 t ha -1 , T4 - 100% RDF + Vermicompost @ 2.5 t ha -1 , T5 - 75% RDF +<br />

Vermicompost @ 2.5 t ha -1 , T6 - 100% RDF + FYM @ 5 t ha -1 + Vermicompost @ 1.25 t ha -1 +<br />

Azospirillumand T7 -75% RDF + FYM @ 5 t ha -1 + Vermicompost @ 1.25 t ha -1 +<br />

Azospirillum.The soil <strong>of</strong> experimental plot was clayey in texture with chemical composition<br />

such as low in available nitrogen (125.3 kg ha -1 ), medium in available phosphorous (18.20 kg ha -<br />

1 ) and very high in available potassium (498.58 kg ha -1 ). The soil was moderately alkaline in<br />

reaction having pH (7.7). The sweet corn hybrid Sugar- 75 was sown on 1 st August, 2019 at<br />

distance <strong>of</strong> 60 cm x 30 cm apart. Organic manures viz., FYM and vermicompost were applied to<br />

the respective plots fifteen days before sowing. The Bi<strong>of</strong>ertilizer Azospirillum obtained from the<br />

Bi<strong>of</strong>ertilizers Production Unit, VNMK, Parbhani was applied one day before sowing @ 10 ml<br />

kg -1 . As per treatments, half dose <strong>of</strong> nitrogenous fertilizers and full dose <strong>of</strong> phosphatic and<br />

potassic fertilizers were applied. The FYM and vermicompost was applied uniformly to all the<br />

plots as per treatments. The next half dose <strong>of</strong> nitrogen fertilizer was applied in bands as top<br />

dressing one month after sowing. The rainfall received during the experimentation was 631.8<br />

mm.<br />

Results<br />

The result revealed that the application <strong>of</strong> 100% RDF + FYM @ 5 t ha -1 + Vermicompost @<br />

1.25 t ha -1 +Azospirillumsignificantly increased the growth characters viz., plant height (200 cm),<br />

number <strong>of</strong> functional leaves (17.60), dry matter accumulation (128.33 g), leaf area (76.35 dm 2 ).<br />

Similar results were also reported by Jadhav and Shelke (2012), Kurneet al., (2012) and Thorat<br />

(2016). The yield attributes namely length <strong>of</strong> cob (33.02 cm), girth <strong>of</strong> cob (23.33 cm), number <strong>of</strong><br />

kernel row cob -1 (16.83), number <strong>of</strong> kernel cob -1 (783.33), total weight <strong>of</strong> cob plant -1 (387.40 g),<br />

Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming,<br />

INM, soil-microorganisms-plant interactions<br />

521 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

green cob yield (10621 Kg ha -1 ) and green fodder yield (21824 Kg ha -1 ) <strong>of</strong> sweet corn were<br />

significantly highest with the application <strong>of</strong> 100% RDF + FYM @ 5 t ha -1 + Vermicompost @<br />

1.25 t ha -1 + Azospirillum. Similar findings were also noted by Jadhav and Shelke (2012) and<br />

Kurneet al., (2012) and Thorat (2016).<br />

References<br />

Jadhav, V.T. and Shelke, D. K. 2012. Effect <strong>of</strong> planting methods and fertilizer levels on growth, yield and<br />

economics <strong>of</strong> maize (Zea mays L.) Hybrids. J. Agric. Res. Tech., 37(1): 011-014.<br />

Kurne, R.A., Jadhav, Y. R. and Mohite, A. B. 2017. Effect <strong>of</strong> fertilizer levels and plant densities on<br />

growth, productivity and economics <strong>of</strong> sweet corn in summer season. Contemp. Res. India, 7(3):<br />

2231-2237.<br />

Thorat, K. S. 2016. Response <strong>of</strong> sweet corn to different fertilizers levels and spacing in kharif season.<br />

Thesis submitted for M.Sc. (Agri.) degree to Vasantarao Naik Marathwada Krishi Vidyapeeth,<br />

Parabhani<br />

Mean plant height (cm), No. <strong>of</strong> leaves plant -1 , dry matter (g) plant -1 , No. <strong>of</strong> cobs plant -1 ,<br />

length <strong>of</strong> cob (cm), girth <strong>of</strong> cob (cm), No. <strong>of</strong> kernel row cob -1 <strong>of</strong> sweet corn as influenced by<br />

Treatments<br />

different treatments at harvest<br />

plant<br />

height<br />

(cm)<br />

No. <strong>of</strong> leaves<br />

plant -1<br />

Dry<br />

matter<br />

No. <strong>of</strong><br />

cob<br />

plant -1<br />

Length<br />

<strong>of</strong> cob<br />

T 1-100% RDF 171.67 14.67 107.4 1 27.81<br />

T 2 - 100% RDF + FYM @ 5 t ha -1 173.67 14.93 110.1 1 28.52<br />

T 3 -75% RDF + FYM @ 5 t ha -1 159.33 13.37 98.03 1 25<br />

(g)<br />

(cm)<br />

T 4 -100% RDF + Vermicompost @ 2.5 t<br />

ha -1<br />

T 5 -75% RDF + Vermicompost @ 2.5 t<br />

ha -1<br />

T 6 -100% RDF + FYM @ 5 t ha -1 +<br />

Vermicompost @ 1.25 t ha -1<br />

+Azospirillum<br />

185 15.07 111.37 1 29.5<br />

166.67 13.93 100.13 1 27.33<br />

200 17.6 128.33 1.17 33.02<br />

T 7 -75% RDF + FYM @ 5 t ha -1 +<br />

Vermicompost@ 1.25 t ha -1<br />

+Azospirillum<br />

194 15.87 116.67 1.1 30.27<br />

SE± 8.37 0.74 5.33 0.17 1.35<br />

CD at 5% 25.78 2.29 16.42 NS 4.17<br />

522 | Page Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming, INM, soilmicroorganisms-plant<br />

interactions


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

T4-34P-1323<br />

Effect <strong>of</strong> Sulphur Levels and Spacings on Growth and Yield <strong>of</strong> Linseed (Linum Usitatissium<br />

L.) under VertisolsIn Rainfed Situation <strong>of</strong> Marathwada Region<br />

V. B. Awasarmal, Khazi G. S., Shikari A. R. and A.H. Nanher<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Agronomy, College <strong>of</strong> Agriculture, Vasantrao Naik Marathwada Krishi Vidyapeeth,<br />

Parbhani – 431402, Maharashtra<br />

Linseed (Linum usitatissimum L.) is one <strong>of</strong> the oldest rabi oilseed crop under cultivation.<br />

Linseed is cool weather loving crop grown either as sole crop or mixed crop. The productivity <strong>of</strong><br />

linseed in Maharashtra is low due to cultivation under residual soil moisture, no input condition,<br />

utera system <strong>of</strong> cropping and major linseed growing areas are under moisture stress situation and<br />

protected irrigation facilities not available. To meet the requirement <strong>of</strong> growing population, it is<br />

necessary to increase the productivity <strong>of</strong> the crop and nutrient management is one <strong>of</strong> the answers<br />

to this issue. (Chaudhary2009). The main reason for low productivity <strong>of</strong> linseed is its cultivation<br />

in marginal and sub marginal lands under poor management and input starved rainfed conditions.<br />

Further lack <strong>of</strong> balanced nutrient management is one <strong>of</strong> the major causes <strong>of</strong> low yield.<br />

Methodology<br />

The experiment was conducted at Agricultural Research Farm, Department <strong>of</strong> Agronomy,<br />

College <strong>of</strong> Agriculture Parbhani, Maharashtra duringRabi season <strong>of</strong> 2020. The soil <strong>of</strong> the<br />

experimental plot was clayey in texture and slightly alkaline in reaction having low in organi<br />

ccarbon, available nitrogen and phosphorus, but marginally high in available potassium.<br />

Experiment was conducted in Split plot design with three replications. The treatments were<br />

consisting <strong>of</strong> four spacing as main plot treatments and three sulphur levels as sub plot treatments.<br />

The treatments are T1–30×15cm 2 , T2–30 ×10cm 2 , T3–45 ×10cm 2 , T4–45 ×15cm 2 , S1–0,S2–<br />

10Kgha -1 S3–20Kgha -1 .<br />

Results<br />

Results revealed that the mean growth attributes <strong>of</strong> linseed was significantlyobserved under the<br />

treatment T2 (30cm x10cm) while minimum growth characters was<br />

recordedundertreatmentT4(45cmx15cm). In case <strong>of</strong> Sulphur levels maximum observations<br />

pertaining to growth was recorded in treatmentS3 where 20 kg sulphur per ha was applied. It was<br />

significantly superior over rest<strong>of</strong> the treatments.<br />

Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming,<br />

INM, soil-microorganisms-plant interactions<br />

523 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Seed, Straw, Biological yield and Harvest Index <strong>of</strong> linseed as influenced by different<br />

treatments<br />

Treatments<br />

Seed yield<br />

(kgha -1 )<br />

Straw yield<br />

(kgha -1 )<br />

Biological<br />

yield (kgha -1 )<br />

Harvest<br />

Index<br />

(%)<br />

Spacings(cm)<br />

T1:30cmx15cm 927.40 1759.11 2686.51 34.52<br />

T2:30cmx10cm 1022.13 1920.14 2942.27 34.74<br />

T3:45cmx10cm 789.65 1527.49 2317.14 34.07<br />

T4:45cmx15cm 683.72 1464.23 2147.95 31.83<br />

SE± 86.41 120.91 239.21 --<br />

CDat5% 211.46 220.87 585.28 --<br />

Sulphurlevels(kgha -1 )<br />

S1:0 619.44 1284.78 1904.22 32.5<br />

S2:10kgha 856.61 1683.34 2539.95 33.72<br />

S3:20kgha 1091.14 2087.63 3178.77 34.32<br />

SE± 77.97 128.14 258.58 --<br />

CDat5% 233.76 384.17 615.23 --<br />

Interaction (TXS)<br />

SE± 119.61 181.91 363.92 --<br />

CDat5% NS NS NS --<br />

GM 855.72 1685.66 2530.97 33.67<br />

Data on seed, straw, biological yields and Harvest index as influenced byvarious treatments. The<br />

differences in seed, straw andbiological yield due to various treatments were significant and the<br />

mean seed, straw, biological yields and harvest index were 855.72 kg ha -1 ,1685.66 kg ha -1 ,<br />

2530.97kgha -1 and 33.67% respectively. Among different spacing data on yield revealed that the<br />

treatment T2 (30cm x10 cm) produced significantly highest seed yield whichwas found at par<br />

with treatment T1 (30cm x15cm) than rest <strong>of</strong> the treatments.Significantly highest yield was<br />

recorded with the application <strong>of</strong> 20 kgsulphurha -1 thanrest<strong>of</strong>thetreatmentsi.e.S1 (control) and S2<br />

(10kgha -1 ).Increasein seed yield with increase in sulphur level was might be due to the reason<br />

that Sulphur was involved in the formation <strong>of</strong> chlorophyll, which promotes photosynthesis and<br />

activation <strong>of</strong> enzyme; Sulphur application has been reported to favor yield due to proper<br />

partitioning <strong>of</strong> photo syntheses from source to sink (Singh2016).<br />

524 | Page Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming, INM, soilmicroorganisms-plant<br />

interactions


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

References<br />

Chaudhary, S. 2009. Study <strong>of</strong> row spacings for different varieties <strong>of</strong> Linseed (Linum usitatissium<br />

L.). Int. J. Plant Sci., 4 (2):373-374.<br />

Singh, P.K. 2016. Status paper on Linseed/ Flax agriculture. In Omega-3 fatty acids, Springer,<br />

Cham. 21-44.<br />

T4-35P-1328<br />

Growth and Yield <strong>of</strong> Soybean as Influenced by Foliar Application <strong>of</strong> Growth<br />

Regulators, Seaweed Extract and Potassium Nitrate<br />

J. D. Kalambe * , G. A. Bhalerao, S.S . Kinge and P.B. Kale<br />

VNMKV Parbhani, India. 431402<br />

* jyotikalambe95@gmail.com<br />

Soybean is a short season leguminous crop that grows in a warm climate with intermediate to<br />

heavy rainfall. Soybean, a wonder legume has high nutritive value and has manifold uses in<br />

agriculture, medicine and industrial sector. Sea weed extract is a new generation <strong>of</strong> natural<br />

organic fertilizers containing highly effective nutrition’s and promotes faster germination <strong>of</strong><br />

seeds and increase yield and resistance ability <strong>of</strong> many crops. Seaweed is richest <strong>of</strong> mineral<br />

elements containing calcium, magnesium, potassium, chlorine, sulphur, phosphorous, iodine,<br />

zinc, copper. Liquid fertilizers derived from natural sources like seaweeds are found to be viable<br />

alternatives to fertilizing input for agricultural crops due to its high level <strong>of</strong> organic matter, micro<br />

and macro elements, fatty acid and growth hormones, (Jensen 1993; Noda 1990). The yield <strong>of</strong><br />

soybean can be enhanced through physiological growth manipulation by way <strong>of</strong> foliar<br />

application <strong>of</strong> seaweed extract. The foliar application <strong>of</strong> growth regulators, seaweed extract and<br />

potassium nitrate at flowering and pod developing stage significantly increased the growth and<br />

yield contributing characters <strong>of</strong> soybean. Therefore, attempts were made to study the growth and<br />

yield <strong>of</strong> soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merrill) as influenced by foliar application <strong>of</strong> growth<br />

regulators, seaweed extract and potassium nitrate.<br />

Methodology<br />

The field experiment was conducted during kharif 2018 at experimental farm, Department <strong>of</strong><br />

Agronomy, College <strong>of</strong> Agriculture, VNMKV, Parbhani. The experiment consisted <strong>of</strong> seven<br />

treatments viz., Salicylic acid-50ppm (T1), GA3-100ppm (T2), Nitrobenzene-400ppm (T3), NAA-<br />

20ppm (T4), Seaweed extract- 400 ppm (T5), Potassium nitrate-2% (T6), Water spray (T7) and<br />

Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming,<br />

INM, soil-microorganisms-plant interactions<br />

525 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

two stages <strong>of</strong> application i.e. at the time <strong>of</strong> flowering and pod developing stage. The variety<br />

MAUS-71 was used and experiment was arranged in Randomized Block Design with three<br />

replications and comprised <strong>of</strong> 21-unit plots. The gross and net size <strong>of</strong> each plot was 5.4 m x 4.5<br />

m, 4.5 m x 4.0 m, respectively. Sowing was done on 1 st July, 2018 by dibbling one seed per hill<br />

at a recommended spacing <strong>of</strong> 45cm X 05cm.The recommended dose <strong>of</strong> fertilizer (30:60:30 kg<br />

NPK ha -1 ) was applied through Urea, Single super phosphate (SSP), Muriate <strong>of</strong> potash (MOP) as<br />

a source <strong>of</strong> nitrogen, phosphorous, potassium, respectively. All the growth regulators, seaweed<br />

extract and potassium nitrate were applied in two sprayings as foliar spray, 1 st spraying at the<br />

time <strong>of</strong> flowering and 2 nd spraying at pod developing stage. The crop was harvested on 10 th<br />

October, 2018.<br />

Results<br />

Foliar application <strong>of</strong> different growth regulators, seaweed extract and potassium nitrate exposed<br />

variation on growth characteristics <strong>of</strong> soybean such as plant height, number <strong>of</strong> functional leaves,<br />

leaf area, number <strong>of</strong> branches, total dry matter accumulation. Among all the treatments<br />

application <strong>of</strong> treatment T5- Seaweed extract- 400 ppm to soybean crop at flowering and pod<br />

developing stage showed better result with respect to plant height (49.90cm), number <strong>of</strong><br />

functional leaves (23.57), leaf area (9.60 dm 2 ), number <strong>of</strong> branches (6.18), mean dry matter<br />

accumulation (16.73 g) and at par with treatment T2- GA3-100ppm and T1- Salicylic acid-50ppm.<br />

However lower values were recorded in treatment T7-Water spray.<br />

Yield<strong>of</strong> soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merrill) as influenced by foliar application <strong>of</strong> growth<br />

regulators, seaweed extract and potassium nitrate.<br />

Tr.<br />

No<br />

Treatments<br />

No. <strong>of</strong><br />

pods<br />

plant -1<br />

No. <strong>of</strong><br />

seeds<br />

plant -1<br />

Seed<br />

yield<br />

plant -1<br />

(g)<br />

Seed<br />

index<br />

(g)<br />

Seed<br />

yield kg<br />

ha -1<br />

Straw<br />

yield kg<br />

ha -1<br />

T 1 Salicylic Acid-50 ppm 29.09 68.50 5.70 8.90 2014 2877 42.03<br />

T 2 GA 3-100 ppm 30.29 70.90 6.20 9.39 2246 2943 43.28<br />

T 3 Nitrobenzene-400 ppm 27.05 63.30 5.12 8.37 1909 2661 41.78<br />

T 4 NAA-20 ppm 26.24 60.04 4.83 8.02 1821 2520 41.95<br />

T 5 Seaweed extract-400ppm 32.97 72.83 6.57 9.62 2307 3055 43.02<br />

T 6 KNO 3-2% 25.41 58.16 4.59 7.98 1722 2455 41.22<br />

T 7 Water spray 24.00 49.90 3.17 7.05 1509 2235 40.30<br />

S.E.(m) ± 1.61 2.94 0.37 0.50 111.91 155.63 -<br />

C.D. at 5% 4.96 9.07 1.14 NS 344.03 479.52 -<br />

General mean 27.86 63.38 5.17 8.44 1932.57 2678 42.04<br />

Harvest<br />

index<br />

%<br />

526 | Page Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming, INM, soilmicroorganisms-plant<br />

interactions


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

The foliar application <strong>of</strong> different growth regulators, seaweed extract and potassium nitrate<br />

showed variation on yield characteristics <strong>of</strong> soybean such as number <strong>of</strong> pods plant -1 , Number <strong>of</strong><br />

seeds plant -1 , Seed yield plant -1 (g), Seed index (g) (Weight <strong>of</strong> 100 seeds), Seed yield kg ha 1 ,<br />

Straw yield kg ha -1 , Harvest index %. Among all the treatments application <strong>of</strong> T5- seaweed<br />

extract-400 ppm significantly increased all the yield parameters except harvest index. The<br />

highest number <strong>of</strong> pods plant -1 (32.97), Number <strong>of</strong> seeds plant -1 (72.83), seed yield plant -1 (6.57<br />

g), seed index (9.62 g), seed yield (2307 kg ha 1 ), straw yield (3055 kg ha -1 ) were observed at<br />

seaweed extract-400ppm which was significantly higher over all the treatments but highest<br />

harvest index (43.28%) was observed in T2- GA3-100ppm, and was at par with treatment T2-<br />

GA3-100ppm and T1- Salicylic acid-50ppm. However lower values were recorded in treatment<br />

T7-Water spray. Similar trend <strong>of</strong> observation observed by Kavitha et al. (2008), Agwane and<br />

Parhe (2015), Satish Kumar et al. (2018).<br />

Conclusion<br />

One-year experiment was conducted on soybean crop with different application <strong>of</strong> growth<br />

regulators, seaweed extract and potassium nitrate during KHARIFseason 2018. Based on this<br />

field investigation the following conclusioncan be drawn. Foliar application <strong>of</strong> Seaweed extract -<br />

400 ppm at flowering and pod developing stage recorded highest growth parameters, yield<br />

attributes and seed yield having at par values with GA3 -100 ppm and Salicylic acid -50 ppm.<br />

From the above results and discussion, it may be concluded that, application <strong>of</strong> seaweed extract-<br />

400 ppm at flowering and pod developing stage would be promising practice for soybean growth<br />

and yield.<br />

References<br />

Agwane, R. B. and Parhe, S. D. 2015. Effect <strong>of</strong> seed priming on crop growth and seed yield <strong>of</strong> soybean (Glycine<br />

max L. Merrill). Bioscan 10: 265-270.<br />

Jensen. 1993. Presence and future needs for algal products. Hydrobiologia 261: 15-21.<br />

Kavitha, M. P., Ganeshraja, V. and Paulpandi, V. K. 2008. Effect <strong>of</strong> foliar spraying <strong>of</strong> sea weed extract on<br />

growth and yield <strong>of</strong> rice (Oryzasativa L.) Agric. Sci. Digest, 28(2): 127 - 129.<br />

Noda. 1990. Antitumour activity <strong>of</strong> marine algae. Hydrobiologia 204: 577-584.<br />

Satish Kumar, A. N., Sakthivel, E., Subramanian, R., Kalpana, P., Janaki. and Rajesh, P. 2018. Influence<br />

<strong>of</strong> foliar spray <strong>of</strong> nutrients and plant growth regulators on physiological attributes and yield <strong>of</strong><br />

finger<br />

millet<br />

(Eleusine coracana (L.) Gaertn.). Int. J. Chem. Stud., 6(3): 2876-2879.<br />

Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming,<br />

INM, soil-microorganisms-plant interactions<br />

527 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

T4-36P-1351<br />

Nutrient Management for Sustaining Productivity <strong>of</strong> Sunflower Based<br />

Cropping Systems in Vertisols <strong>of</strong> AP<br />

K. Prabhakar 1 , B. V. Venkata Ramanamma 1 , B. V. Prakash Reddy 1 , K. Ramesh 2 ,<br />

Y. S. Satish Kumar 1 , R. Narasimhulu 1 and N. C. Venkateswarlu 1<br />

1 AICRP on Sunflower, RARS, Nandyal, ANGRAU, A. P.<br />

2<br />

ICAR-IIOR, Rajendranagar, T.S.<br />

* kprabhakar7714@gmail.com<br />

Sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) is an important oilseed crop fourth next to soybean,<br />

groundnut, and rape seed. In India, sunflower is grown over an area <strong>of</strong> 8.30 lakh hectares with a<br />

production and productivity <strong>of</strong> 5.44 lakh tonnes and 655 kg per hectare, respectively during the<br />

year 2012-13. In Andhra Pradesh, it is mostly grown as a rabi crop. In combined Andhra<br />

Pradesh, the area under this crop has come down from 4.19 lakh hectares in 2008-09 to 1.42 lakh<br />

hectares in 2012- 13. About 80 percent <strong>of</strong> this area is under rabi. The area has further decreased<br />

and reached 13,000 hectares in 2018-19. (Nimbrayan et al., 2020) In recent changed cropping<br />

systems under ID conditions, new pr<strong>of</strong>itable crops were cultivated in the Kurnool district very<br />

extensively like Bt cotton, Maize, and Soybean, but scientific study and recommendations were<br />

not available to sustain the yields and net returns <strong>of</strong> popular new emerging cropping systems.<br />

Hence this study was initiated to know the suitable fertilizer dose and sunflower cropping<br />

systems for Kurnool district. Among various methods <strong>of</strong> fertilizer recommendation such as<br />

general recommended dose (RDF), soil test-based recommendation, critical value approach, etc.,<br />

the soil test crop response (STCR) approach for target yield is unique in indicating both soil testbased<br />

fertilizer dose and the level <strong>of</strong> yield that can be achieved with good agronomic practices<br />

(Singh et al., 2005)<br />

Methodology<br />

Field experiment were carried out for four consecutive Kharif and Rabi seasons <strong>of</strong> 2017-18 and<br />

2020-21 at R.A.R.S. Farm, Nandyal, Andhra Pradesh. The treatments comprised <strong>of</strong> four<br />

cropping systems viz., Cotton-sunflower (CS1), Maize-sunflower (CS2), Soybean-sunflower<br />

(CS3) and Sunflower-Chickpea (CS4) as main plots and three fertilizer levels for Rabi i.e 100%<br />

RDF (75 N 90+ P2O5+ 60 K2O kg/ha) 100% STCR and 50% STCR as sub plots. The<br />

experimental design was split-plot and treatments were replicated thrice. Kharif crops cotton<br />

(Jaadu Bt), Maize, (Syngenta, 46866) Soybean (JS-335) and Sunflower (NDSH-1012) were<br />

cultivated in main plots by following recommended package <strong>of</strong> practices and recommended dose<br />

528 | Page Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming, INM, soilmicroorganisms-plant<br />

interactions


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

<strong>of</strong> fertilizer doses (RDF) in RBD. For Rabi crops, sunflower and chickpea were raised in<br />

respective main plots as subplots duly imposing fertilizer doses as treatment schedule. STCR<br />

DOSES were calculated based on soil test results <strong>of</strong> kharif post harvest soil available NPK with<br />

25 q targeted yields by using STCR equations. Sunflower equivalent yields, cost <strong>of</strong> cultivation<br />

and net returns were calculated by using standard procedures. The data on various parameters <strong>of</strong><br />

crop was statistically analyzed by following ANOVA.<br />

Results<br />

Results on Rabi Sunflower equivalent yields indicated that seed yield was significantly<br />

influenced by nutrient management practices and cropping system. Among nutrient management<br />

practices tested, 100% STCR recorded significantly higher sunflower equivalent yields (1799<br />

kg/ha) followed by 100% RDF treatment. Significantly lower sunflower equivalent yields were<br />

recorded with 50 % STCR dose <strong>of</strong> fertilizers were applied. Similarly, Soybean-sunflower<br />

cropping system recorded significantly higher sunflower equivalent yields (2072 kg/ha) which<br />

was on par with Maize-sunflower cropping system (2057 kh/ha). cotton–Sunflower cropping<br />

system recorded significantly lower sunflower equivalent yields (914 kg/ha) among four<br />

cropping systems tried. Interaction effect between nutrient management practices and cropping<br />

systems was significant. Sunflower being an exhaustive crop requires higher dose <strong>of</strong> fertilizer in<br />

Rabi season. Hence crop responded for 100% STCR treatment and equation applied for targeted<br />

yield <strong>of</strong> 25q. Shanwaz et.al., 2015 also reported the positive results on sunflower yields with<br />

STCR approach which was ageing the present results. Sheoron et al., 2017 reported that<br />

significant response in yield was observed inclusion <strong>of</strong> farmyard manure (FYM) with the<br />

recommended NPK in the cropping system indicating 6.2% -7.0% grain in system productivity<br />

over the existing recommendations. Results on system equivalent yields and economics shows<br />

that, Maize-sunflower cropping system recorded higher sunflower equivalent yields (3117 kg/ha)<br />

and highest net returns (Rs.119313/- ha), among four cropping systems tested in study. However<br />

soybean sunflower cropping system recorded higher cost-benefit (C:B) ratio (1:3.0)<br />

Conclusion<br />

It is concluded that Maize- sunflower cropping system recorded significantly higher sunflower<br />

yield followed by soybean- sunflower cropping system. Cotton- sunflower cropping system<br />

recorded significantly lower sunflower yields when compared with rest <strong>of</strong> three cropping<br />

systems<br />

Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming,<br />

INM, soil-microorganisms-plant interactions<br />

529 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

References<br />

Nimbrayan, P. K., Singh Punia, V. K., Anu, M. and Kumar, A. 2020. Trends and Growth Rate<br />

Analysis <strong>of</strong> Sunflower in Haryana and India. Res. J. Agric. Sci. 11(3): 686-688.<br />

Sheoran, P., Sardana, V., Singh, S., Chander, S., Kumar Mann, A. and Sharma, P. 2017.<br />

Nutrient management for sustaining productivity <strong>of</strong> sunflower-based cropping sequence<br />

in Indian semiarid regions. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 48 (5)581-593.<br />

Singh, K. N., Raju, N. S., Subba, A. R., Abhishek, R., Sanjay, S., Samanta, R. K. and Maji.<br />

2005. Prescribing optimum dose <strong>of</strong> nutrients for targeted yield through soil fertility map<br />

in Andhra Pradesh (AP). J. Indian Soc. Agric. Statist., 59(2): 131-140.<br />

Yield <strong>of</strong> Rabi crop (Sunflower equivalent yield (Kg/ha)<br />

Treatments<br />

Cotton - Maize - Soybean - Sunflower -<br />

Sunflower Sunflower Sunflower Chickpea<br />

Mean<br />

100 % RDF 807 2114 2091 1146 1538<br />

100 % STCR 1209 2437 2368 1181 1799<br />

50 % STCR 725 1625 1759 1091 1302<br />

Mean 914 2057 2072 1139<br />

SEm CD (P=0.05) CV<br />

Main 82 238 12.2<br />

Sub 60 186 11.8<br />

M x S 79 244 10.3<br />

Effect <strong>of</strong> Integrated Nutrient Management on Growth and Yield <strong>of</strong><br />

KharifGroundnut (Arachis HypogeaL.)<br />

A. K. Ghotmukale, V. P. Suryavanshi, Dipak Davkhar and M. V. Dhuppe<br />

Oilseeds Research Station, Latur- 413512<br />

Vasantrao Naiki Marathwada krishi Vidyapeeth, Parbhani (Maharashtra State, India)<br />

T4-37P-1361<br />

Groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) is one <strong>of</strong> the most important leguminous oiolseeds crop<br />

belonging to family Leguminosae and sub family Papilionaceae. Groundnut crop is cultivated as<br />

rainfed crop during the kharif season but, fails to produce the productivity. Nutrient<br />

management is one <strong>of</strong> the important factors which influences the yield. Hence, experiment<br />

entitled “Effect <strong>of</strong> integrated nutrient management on growth and yield <strong>of</strong> kharif Groundnut”<br />

530 | Page Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming, INM, soilmicroorganisms-plant<br />

interactions


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

(Arachis hypogea L.) was conducted at Oilseeds Research Station, Latur (Maharashtra) to study<br />

the effect <strong>of</strong> INM on growth, yield and economics <strong>of</strong> groundnut during kharif season <strong>of</strong> 2020-21.<br />

Methodology<br />

The experiment was conducted in randomized block design with three replications on vertisols at<br />

Oilseeds Research Station, Latur During kharif season <strong>of</strong> 2020-2021. Eight INM treatments were<br />

applied to the crop viz., T1- RDF(control) , T2- RDF+FYM @ 5 t/ha., T3- RDF+ Vermicompost<br />

@ 2.5 T/ha., T4- RDF+Poultry manure @5 t/ha., T5- RDF+Elemental Sulphur @ 20 kg/ha., T6-<br />

RDFR+ Znso4 @ 20 kg/ha., T7- Feso4 @ 20 kg/ha and T8- RDF+Gypsum @ 500 kg/ha. All the<br />

nutrients were applied at the time <strong>of</strong> sowing. The data were analyzed statistically with standard<br />

ANOVA method.<br />

Results<br />

Pod yield, Gross monetary returns (GMR), Net monetary returns (NMR) and B: C ratio <strong>of</strong><br />

groundnut varied significantly due to various nutrient management treatments. Treatment T3 i. e.<br />

application <strong>of</strong> RDF+Vermicompost @ 2.5 t/ha recorded significantly highest pod yield (2080<br />

kg/ha.) which was found at par with T2 (RDF+FYM @ 5 t/ha.) and T8 (100% RDF+Gypsum @<br />

500 kg/ha.) The highest GMR (99840 Rs/ha.) was also recorded with application <strong>of</strong><br />

RDF+Vermicompost @ 2.5 t/ha which was found at par with the application <strong>of</strong> RDF+ FYM<br />

@5t/ha and RDF+ Gypsum @500 kg/ha. The highest NMR (52025 Rs/ha.) was recorded with<br />

the application <strong>of</strong> RDF+Vermicompost @ 2.5 t/ha which was found at par with treatment T8<br />

(RDF+ Gypsum @500 kg/ha.) The highest B: C ratio was obtained with the application <strong>of</strong> RDF+<br />

Gypsum @500 kg/ha followed by treatment T7 (RDF+ Feso4 @ b20 kg/ha.)<br />

Conclusion<br />

On the basis <strong>of</strong> present investigations, it is concluded that application <strong>of</strong> RDF+ Vermicompost @<br />

2.5 t/ha recorded significantly highest pod yield (2080Kg/ha), highest GMR (99840 Rs/ha),<br />

NMR (52025 Rs/ha) and B:C ratio followed by application <strong>of</strong>RDF + FYM @ 5t/ha and<br />

application <strong>of</strong> RDF+ Gypsum @ 500 kg/ha.<br />

Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming,<br />

INM, soil-microorganisms-plant interactions<br />

531 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Pod yield (kg/ha) and Economics (Rs/ha.) <strong>of</strong> groundnut as influenced by different<br />

treatments.<br />

S.N<br />

Treatment<br />

Dry pod<br />

yield (Kg/ha)<br />

GMR<br />

(Rs/ha)<br />

Economics (Rs/ha)<br />

CC<br />

(Rs/ha)<br />

NMR<br />

(Rs/ha)<br />

B:C<br />

ratio<br />

T 1 RDF(Control) 1405 67440 38584 28856 1.74<br />

T 2 RDF + FYM@ 5T/ha 1945 93360 46575 46815 2.0<br />

T 3 RDF+ Vermicompost @2.5t/ha 2080 99840 47815 52025 2.08<br />

T 4 RDF+ Poultry Manure @ 5t/ha 1728 82800 47825 27023 1.73<br />

T 5<br />

RDF+ Elemental Sulphur @ 20<br />

Kg/ha<br />

1610 77280 55777 38416 1.38<br />

T 6 RDF+ZnSO 4 @ 20 Kg/ha 1540 73920 28864 34886 1.90<br />

T 7 RDF+FeSO 4 @ 20 Kg/ha 1880 90240 39034 51190 2.31<br />

T 8 RDF + Gypsum @ 500 Kg/ha 1892 90816 39314 51502 2.31<br />

References<br />

S.E. ± 86 3620 - 3620<br />

C.D. at 5% 257 10850 - 10848<br />

C.V. 9.2 8.3 15<br />

General mean 1760 84480 44223 40258 1.91<br />

Akbari, K. N., Ramdevputra, M. V., Sutaria, G. S., Vora, V. D. and Padmani, D. R. (2011).<br />

Effect <strong>of</strong> organics, bio and inorganic fertilizer on groundnut yield and its residue effect<br />

on succeeding wheat crop. Legume Res., 34(1), 45-47.<br />

Bhatol, D. P., Ptel, N. A. and Pavaya, R.P. (1994). Effect <strong>of</strong> nitrogen phosphorous and zinc<br />

application on yield and uptake <strong>of</strong> nutrient by groundnut. Indian J. Agric. Res., 28(3),<br />

209-213.<br />

Bhutadiya, J.P., Chaudhary, M. G., Damor, R.P., and Patel,A.J. 2019. Effect <strong>of</strong> different organic<br />

sources on growth, yield, yield attributes and economics <strong>of</strong> summer groundnut (Arachis<br />

hypogaea L.) under organic farming. J. Pharmacog. Photochem., 8(2), 846-849.<br />

Chavam, A. R., Chavan, A. S., Yadav, A. M. and Chavan, V.G. 2019. Effect <strong>of</strong> vermicompost,<br />

rock phosphate, PSB and different bio-products on yield and economics <strong>of</strong> groundnut<br />

(Arachis hypogaea L.) Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. Appl. Sci., 8(12), 2031-2039.<br />

532 | Page Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming, INM, soilmicroorganisms-plant<br />

interactions


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Soil Test Crop Response approach for Chickpea Crop in Vertisol<br />

T4-38P-1390<br />

Y. S. Satish Kumar * , K. Arun Kumar, K. Prabhakar, K. Mohan Vishnuvardhan,<br />

K. Jaya Lakshmi, S. Isha Parveen and M. Jyotsna Kiranmayi<br />

Regional Agricultural Research Station, Acharya N. G. Ranga Agricultural University,<br />

Nandyal-518502<br />

* ys.sathishkumar@angrau.ac.in<br />

Various approaches have been tried to determine the amount <strong>of</strong> fertilizer needed for different<br />

crop yield. Among different approaches the targeted yield approach has proved its variation in<br />

the recommendation <strong>of</strong> chemical fertilizers to variety <strong>of</strong> crops. Chickpea (Cicer arientinum) is<br />

the world 3rd most important source <strong>of</strong> food legume crop. Chickpea grains are rich source <strong>of</strong><br />

protein contains about 23% protein, 57% carbohydrates and 5% fat. It is also good source <strong>of</strong><br />

vitamine B and minerals like potassium, phosphorus and zinc. In India, chickpea is grown on an<br />

8.59 million ha area with 7.05 million tonne production. In Maharashtra chickpea is grown on<br />

1.44 million ha area with 0.73-million-ton production. The average productivity <strong>of</strong> chickpea in<br />

India is 840 kg ha-1 which is considerably low as compared to the production potential <strong>of</strong> the<br />

improved cultivars <strong>of</strong> chickpea. The productivity <strong>of</strong> chickpea can be increased by judicious and<br />

balanced fertilization. Fertilizer management through Integrated Plant Nutrient Supply (IPNS)<br />

based yield target fertilizer prescription equations can be the best option for increase in<br />

productivity as well as maintaining the soil health. It is necessary to supply essential nutrient<br />

elements in appropriate proportion to maintain soil health and soil fertility and also to increase<br />

the crop production. Several approaches have been used for fertilizer recommendation based on<br />

chemical soil test so as to attain maximum yield per unit <strong>of</strong> fertilizer use. Among the various<br />

approaches, the target yield approach has found popularity in India (Subba Rao and Srivastava,<br />

2000). This method not only estimates soil test-based fertilizer dose but also the level <strong>of</strong> yield the<br />

farmer can achieve with that particular dose. It gives a real balance between applied nutrients and<br />

the available nutrients already present in the soil. Crop fertilization based on generalized<br />

recommendation leads to under fertilization or over fertilization, which leads lower production,<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>itability along with environmental pollution. Enhancement <strong>of</strong> farm pr<strong>of</strong>itability under<br />

different soil climate condition it is necessary to have information on optimum fertilizer<br />

recommendation for different crop which are based on the soil test and crop response studies.<br />

Keeping in view, the present investigation entitled ‘Soil test crop response approach for chickpea<br />

crop in Vertisol’ was undertaken to assess the effect <strong>of</strong> STCR based N, P and K application on<br />

productivity <strong>of</strong> Chickpea crop.<br />

Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming,<br />

INM, soil-microorganisms-plant interactions<br />

533 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Methodology<br />

The field experiments were conducted during the kharif& Rabi seasons <strong>of</strong> crop years, 2019, 2020 &<br />

2021at Regional Agricultural Research Station, Nandyala, Andhra Pradesh. The soil <strong>of</strong> experimental site<br />

was medium deep black, low in organic carbon (0.24 %), low in Nitrogen (116 kg/ha), high in available<br />

P 2O 5 (69.5 kg ha -1 ) and available K 2O (536 kg ha -1 ). In Kharif, crops maize, sunflower and blackgram<br />

crops were sown in 3 main plots. In rabi, each main plot devided in to 3 sub plots and chick pea crop was<br />

sown with application <strong>of</strong> 100% RDF, 100% STCR equation (Target 20 q/ha) and 50% STCR equation<br />

(Target 20 q/ha) by following STCR equation <strong>of</strong> FN = 5.03 T – 0.27 SN FP 2O 5 = 9.71 T – 1.82 SP<br />

FK 2O = 6.23 T – 0.22 SK .<br />

Results<br />

Among the three cropping sequences, the higher chickpea yield (2045kg/ha) recorded in Sunflower -<br />

chickpea cropping sequence with 50% STCR based fertilizer application. Among the fertilizer treatments<br />

50% STCR recorded higher chickpea yield followed by 100 % STCR and 100 % RDF in all the cropping<br />

sequences in all the years.<br />

Influence <strong>of</strong> site-specific nutrient management on growth and yield <strong>of</strong> chickpea during rabi<br />

2021-22<br />

Cropping system<br />

Black gram followed<br />

by Chickpea<br />

Maize followed by<br />

Chickpea<br />

Sunflower followed by<br />

Chickpea<br />

Treatments<br />

Plant height<br />

(cm)<br />

No. <strong>of</strong> pods<br />

plant -1<br />

Test weight<br />

(g)<br />

Yield (kg/ha)<br />

100%RDF 44.4 51 31.5 1680<br />

100% STCR 41.5 54 28.3 1820<br />

50% STCR 42.0 43 30.7 1850<br />

100%RDF 39.3 40 27.0 1857<br />

100% STCR 39.4 40 28.7 1925<br />

50% STCR 41.5 44 28.3 1908<br />

100%RDF 40.9 41 29.5 1785<br />

100% STCR 38.7 34 28.3 1833.<br />

50% STCR 38.6 29 28.3 2045<br />

References<br />

Jadhav, A.B., Kadlag, A.D., Patil, V.S., Bachkar, S.R., Dale, R.M. 2009. Response <strong>of</strong> chickpea to<br />

conjoint application <strong>of</strong> inorganic fertilizers based on STCR approach and vermicomposting on<br />

Inceptisol. J. Maharashtra Agric. Univ., 34(2):125-127.<br />

Salunkhe, S.H., Kadlag. And Durgude, S.A. 2018. Soil test crop response approach for chickpea in an<br />

Inceptisol. Int. J. Chem. Stud., 6(4): 1954-1959.<br />

534 | Page Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming, INM, soilmicroorganisms-plant<br />

interactions


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

T4-39P-1421<br />

Studies on Growth Yield and Quality <strong>of</strong> Sesame (Sesamum indicum L.) as<br />

Influenced by Chemical Fertilizers and Liquid Bi<strong>of</strong>ertilizer<br />

S. G. Mane, B. N. Aglave, A. S. Karle, B.V. Asewar, S.V. Thombre and K.A. Chavan<br />

College <strong>of</strong> Agriculture, Parbhani, Maharashtra<br />

Vasantrao Naik Marathwada Krishi Vidyapeeth, Parbhani, Maharashtra<br />

Sesame (Sesamum indicum L.) belongs to the family <strong>of</strong> pedaliaceae and is one <strong>of</strong> the most<br />

ancient oilseeds crop known and used by mankind <strong>of</strong> the world. It is considered to have both<br />

notional and medicinal value. Moreover, seed is a rich source <strong>of</strong> edible oil (48-55%) and protein<br />

(20-28%) with anti-oxidants lignans such as sesamolin and sesamin which prevents rancidity and<br />

give sesame oil a shelf life. Sesame oil is called ‘poor man’s ghee’. The lignin content has useful<br />

physiological effect in human and animal health. The seeds are very rich in iron, magnesium,<br />

manganese, copper and calcium and contain vitamin E, A, B and B1. The seed contain<br />

phytosterols associate with reducing the level <strong>of</strong> blood cholesterol and also phytoestrogens with<br />

antioxidants an anti-cancer property. The plant receives bi<strong>of</strong>ertilizer and fertilizers always give<br />

higher yield and better-quality yield. The price <strong>of</strong> chemical fertilizers has gone up tremendously<br />

and the marginal farmer can not afford such costly fertilisers. About 50% <strong>of</strong> applied inorganic<br />

fertilizers are lost either through leaching or volatilization, under this situation use <strong>of</strong> bi<strong>of</strong>ertilizer<br />

could be the key to sustain soil fertility to obtain the desired level <strong>of</strong> yield and quality. But, the<br />

efficiency <strong>of</strong> biological fertilizers will increase at the presence <strong>of</strong> chemical fertilizers<br />

Methodology<br />

A field experiment was conducted during kharif season <strong>of</strong> 2018 at the Experimental farm,<br />

College <strong>of</strong> Agricultural, Latur to studies on growth, yield and quality <strong>of</strong> sesame (Sesamum<br />

indicum L.) as influenced by chemical fertilizers and liquid bi<strong>of</strong>ertilizer. The soil <strong>of</strong> the<br />

experimental site was medium, black in color with good drainage. The soil was clayey in texture,<br />

low in available nitrogen, medium in available phosphorus, medium in available potassium and<br />

alkaline (pH 8.04) in reaction. The experiment was laid out in randomized block design with<br />

three replications and the treatment were consisting <strong>of</strong> seven with chemical fertilizers and liquid<br />

bi<strong>of</strong>ertilizer. The treatments were, T1- 40:20:00 Kg NPK ha -1 , T2- 50:25:00 kg NPK ha -1 , T3-<br />

60:30:00 kg NPK ha -1 , T4 – Azotobacter + PSB, T5– 40:20:00 kg NPK ha -1 + Azotobacter +<br />

PSB, T6- 50:25:00 kg NPK ha -1 +Azotobacter + PSB, T7- 60:30:00 kg NPK ha -1 + Azotobacter +<br />

PSB. Sowing was done by dibbling by using seed rate 2.5- 4.0 kg ha -1 . The gross and net plot<br />

size was 5.4 m x 4.5 m and 4.5 m x 3.9 m respectively. The total rainfall received during growth<br />

Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming,<br />

INM, soil-microorganisms-plant interactions<br />

535 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

period <strong>of</strong> sesame was 271.8 mm with 13 rainy days. The recommended dose <strong>of</strong> fertilizer was<br />

50:25:00 kg NPK ha -1 applied as per treatments through Urea, single super phosphate and<br />

application <strong>of</strong> liquid bi<strong>of</strong>ertilizer for seed treatment 6 ml kg -1 .<br />

Results<br />

Growth and growth attributes: The data revealed that the growth attributes viz., The<br />

application <strong>of</strong> 60:30:00 kg NPK ha -1 + Azotobacter and PSB (T7) produced significantly higher<br />

plant height and leaf area per plant which was at par with application <strong>of</strong> 60:30:00 kg NPK ha -1<br />

(T3) <strong>of</strong> sesame as compared to other treatments at 30, 45, 60, 75 and at harvest. The increase in<br />

growth attributes may be due to better uptake and translocation <strong>of</strong> plant nutrients to growing<br />

plants, adequate supply <strong>of</strong> nutrients resulted in higher production <strong>of</strong> photosynthate and their<br />

translocation to sink, which ultimately increased the plant growth and growth attributes. The<br />

highest number <strong>of</strong> branches plant -1 (3.53) was recorded with the application <strong>of</strong> 60:30:00 kg NPK<br />

ha -1 + Azotobacter and PSB (T7) followed by Treatment T3 i.e. application <strong>of</strong> 60:30:00 kg NPK<br />

ha -1 produced maximum number <strong>of</strong> branches at all growth stages <strong>of</strong> crop. The increase in growth<br />

under these treatments might be attributed due to the adequate supply <strong>of</strong> nutrients with which the<br />

crop was ultimately favoured better environment for proper growth and development. Total dry<br />

matter plant -1 (g) was the resultant <strong>of</strong> photosynthetic activity and its photo morphogenesis. The<br />

rate <strong>of</strong> increase in dry matter accumulation was slow up 45 days, rapid between 45 to 75 DAS<br />

and attained maximum at harvest. The application <strong>of</strong> 60:30:00 kg NPK ha -1 + Azotobacter and<br />

PSB (T7) followed by T3 i.e. 60:30:00 kg NPK ha -1 produced higher dry matter plant -1 (g) similar<br />

result reported by Deshmukh et al.<br />

Yield attributes and yield: Yield attributes viz., number <strong>of</strong> capsules, weight <strong>of</strong> capsules per<br />

plant, seed yield per plant, seed yield and straw yield (kg/ha) were significantly affected by<br />

different treatments. The capsule yield plant -1 (g) seed yield plant -1 (g) was significantly<br />

influenced by the various treatments. The application <strong>of</strong> 60:30:00 kg NPK ha -1 + Azotobacter<br />

and PSB (T7) recorded higher capsule and seed yield plant-1 followed by application <strong>of</strong> 60:30:00<br />

kg NPK ha -1 (T3). Higher level <strong>of</strong> these parameters could be attributed due to better uptake and<br />

translocation <strong>of</strong> plant nutrients to growing plants, adequate supply <strong>of</strong> nutrients resulted in higher<br />

production <strong>of</strong> photosynthate and their translocation to sink, which ultimately increased the plant<br />

growth and yield attributes. Data on seed yield (kg ha -1 ), straw yield (kg ha -1 ), biological yield<br />

(kg ha -1 ) and harvest index (HI) as influenced by different treatments was found significant. The<br />

application <strong>of</strong> 60:30:00 kg NPK ha -1 + Azotobacter and PSB (T7) recorded higher number <strong>of</strong><br />

capsules plant -1 at harvest followed by (T3) application <strong>of</strong> 60:30:00 kg NPK ha -1 (T3). This<br />

variation in seed yield, straw yield, biological yield (kg ha -1 ) might be due to balanced and<br />

536 | Page Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming, INM, soilmicroorganisms-plant<br />

interactions


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

adequate supply <strong>of</strong> nutrients. Based on above studies it is concluded that among various<br />

treatments, application <strong>of</strong> 60:30:00 kg N.P.K / ha +Azotobacter + PSB observed highest seed<br />

yield (779 kg/ha) and straw yield (3089) followed by 50:25:00 kg N.P.K /ha + Azotobacter +<br />

PSB and 30:60:00 kg N.P.K / ha and found significantly superior over remaining treatments.<br />

Effect onseed yield plant-1, seed yield kg ha-1, straw yield kg ha-1, gross monetary<br />

returns (₹ha -1 ), net monetary returns (₹ha -1 ), benefit: cost ratio<br />

Treatments<br />

Seed yield<br />

(kg ha -1 )<br />

Straw yield<br />

(kg ha -1 )<br />

Gross<br />

monetary<br />

returns<br />

(₹ha -1 )<br />

Net<br />

Monetary<br />

returns<br />

(₹ha -1 )<br />

Benefit:<br />

cost<br />

ratio<br />

T 1- 40:20:00 Kg NPK ha -1 591 2712 59100 28405 1.93<br />

T 2- 50:25:00 kg NPK ha -1 651 2868 65100 34163 2.1<br />

T 3 - 60:30:00 kg NPK ha -1 693 2951 69300 37860 2.2<br />

T 4 – Azotobacter+ PSB 460 2426 46000 17475 1.61<br />

T 5- 40:20:00 kg NPK ha -<br />

1 +Azotobacter+ PSB<br />

598 2724 59800 29005 1.94<br />

T 6- 50:25:00 kg NPK ha -<br />

1 +Azotobacter+ PSB<br />

T 7- 60:30:00 kg NPK ha -<br />

1 +Azotobacter+ PSB<br />

665 2772 66500 35463 2.14<br />

779 3089 77900 46360 2.47<br />

SEm± 39 103 3913 3913 -<br />

C.D. at 5% 121 316 12058 12058 -<br />

General Mean 634 2792 63386 32676 2.06<br />

Conclusions<br />

The application <strong>of</strong> 30:60:00 kg NPK ha -1 + Azotobacter + PSB (T 7) resulted in improvement <strong>of</strong> growth<br />

attributes as well as yield attributes, seed yield (kg ha -1 ), NMR, GMR and B: C ratio and found most<br />

effective and ideal for increasing productivity <strong>of</strong> sesame. The quality parameter was also found<br />

significantly superior for higher oil content (49.90 %) with application <strong>of</strong> 30:60:00 kg NPK ha -1 +<br />

Azotobacter + PSB (T 7). Above conclusion are based on single season research and it needs further<br />

confirmation by repeating the trial for at least one more season.<br />

References<br />

Deshmukh, M. R., Jyotishi Alok. and Ranganathan, A. R. G. 2014. Effect <strong>of</strong> nutrient management on<br />

growth and yield <strong>of</strong> sesame (Sesamum indicum L.). J. Oilseed Res., 31(2):123-125.<br />

Deshmukh, S. S, Sheikh. A. A, Desai, M. M. and Kamble, R. S. 2010. Effect o fintegrated nutrient on<br />

yield <strong>of</strong> summer sesamum. J. Maharastra Agric.Univ. 35(3):453-455.<br />

Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming,<br />

INM, soil-microorganisms-plant interactions<br />

537 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

T4-40P-1455<br />

Response <strong>of</strong> Little Millet (Panicum Sumatrense) to Different Spacing and<br />

Fertilizer Levels<br />

S. J. R. Syed* and B.V. Asewar<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Agronomy, VNMKV Parbhani, Maharashtra, India<br />

*shireenjahan1998@gmail.com<br />

Among minor millets little millet (Panicum sumatrenseL.) is popular millet and is called as<br />

Indian millet. It is resistant to adverse agro-climatic conditions such as severe drought as well as<br />

water logging. The low productivity is on account <strong>of</strong> inadequate and imbalanced use <strong>of</strong><br />

fertilizers, non-adoption <strong>of</strong> suitable varieties and suitable dose <strong>of</strong> nitrogen as well as weedcontrol<br />

measures by the farmers. Crop geometry is an important factor for better utilization <strong>of</strong><br />

moisture and nutrients from the soil (root spread) and above ground growth (plant canopy) by<br />

harvesting maximum possible solar radiation. The optimum plant population exploit<br />

environmental resources to the fullest extent and thereby leading to higher yield <strong>of</strong> crop. Nutrient<br />

supply in soil is one <strong>of</strong> the most important factor that determine the growth <strong>of</strong> the crop. Fertilizer<br />

is the major source <strong>of</strong> plant nutrients required in sufficient quantity to maintain the nutrient<br />

supply in the soil. The response <strong>of</strong> crop to fertilizers depends on the native fertility level <strong>of</strong> soil,<br />

environmental condition and genotype.<br />

Methodology<br />

The field experiment was conducted at PG Research Farm, Department <strong>of</strong> Agronomy, College <strong>of</strong><br />

Agriculture, VNMKV, Parbhani during kharif 2021-22. The experiment was laid out in split plot<br />

design with three replications consisting <strong>of</strong> twelve treatment combination in each. The treatment<br />

consists <strong>of</strong> three spacings (22.5cm × 10cm, 30cm × 10cm and 45cm × 5cm) and four fertilizer<br />

levels (30:15:15 NPK kg ha -1 , 40:20:20 NPK kg ha -1 , 50:25:25 NPK kg ha -1 and 60:30:30 NPK<br />

kg ha -1 ). The experimental plot was clay in texture with low in available nitrogen (194.60 kg ha -<br />

1 ), medium in available phosphorus (12.73 kg ha -1 ) and high in available potassium (513.84 kg<br />

ha -1 ) and slightly alkaline in reaction pH (7.8). The size <strong>of</strong> a gross and net plot <strong>of</strong> each plot was<br />

5.4m × 4.5m and 4.2m × 4.0m, respectively.<br />

Results<br />

Spacingssignificantly influenced the grain and straw yield. Significantly superior grain and straw<br />

yield (934 kg ha -1 ) was obtained when crop was sown at 45 cm × 5 cm and was on par with 22.5<br />

538 | Page Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming, INM, soilmicroorganisms-plant<br />

interactions


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

cm × 10 cm. Spacing 30 cm × 10 cm recorded the lowest grain yield (774 kg ha -1 ). Similar result<br />

was recorded Koriret al. (2018), Swathi et al. (2020).<br />

Influence <strong>of</strong> spacings and fertility levels on yield and economics <strong>of</strong> little millet<br />

Treatment<br />

Grain yield<br />

(Kg ha -1 )<br />

Straw yield<br />

(Kg ha -1 )<br />

GMR (₹<br />

ha -1 )<br />

NMR<br />

(₹ ha -1 )<br />

B:C ratio<br />

Spacings (S)<br />

S 1-22.5cm×10cm 909 1642 59057 31679 2.16<br />

S 2-30cm×10cm 774 1492 50315 23072 1.85<br />

S 3-45cm×5cm 934 1682 60696 33318 2.22<br />

SE (m) ± 30.35 34.03 1700 875 -<br />

C.D. at 5 % 119.14 133.61 6674 3435 -<br />

Fertilizer Levels (F)<br />

F 1 (30:15:15 NPK kg ha -1 ) 782 1476 50803 24456 1.93<br />

F 2 (40:20:20 NPK kg ha -1 ) 814 1529 52930 25925 1.96<br />

F 3 (50:25:25 NPK kg ha -1 ) 925 1687 60155 32493 2.17<br />

F 4 (60:30:30 NPK kg ha -1 ) 967 1729 62869 34549 2.22<br />

SE (m) ± 34.38 48.56 1963 1010 -<br />

C.D. at 5 % 102.16 144.30 5833 3002 -<br />

Interaction effect (S×F)<br />

SE (m) ± 59.55 84.12 3400 1750 -<br />

C.D. at 5 % NS NS NS NS -<br />

G.M 872 1605 56689 29356 1.90<br />

The gross monetary returns and net monetary returns and benefit: cost ratio (2.03) was<br />

significantly influenced by different spacings. Significantly higher gross and net monetary return<br />

(₹60696 ha -1 ) were recorded at 45 cm × 5 cm. spacing. The lowest value <strong>of</strong> gross monetary<br />

returns was recorded by 30 cm × 10 cm (₹50315 ha -1 ).<br />

Among different fertilizer levels, application <strong>of</strong> 60:30:30 NPK Kg ha -1 (F 4) recorded maximum grain<br />

yield (967 kg ha -1 ), straw yield (1729 kg ha -1 ) and biological yield (2696 kg ha -1 ) which was<br />

significantly higher over 30:15:15 NPK kg ha -1 (F 1) and 40:20:20 NPK Kg ha -1 (F 2) and found at par<br />

with 50:25:25 NPK Kg ha -1 (F 3).<br />

Application <strong>of</strong> 60:30:30 NPK Kg ha -1 (F 4) recorded the maximum GMR (₹ 62869) and NMR (₹<br />

34549) which was superior over 30:15:15 NPK kg ha -1 (F 1) and 40:20:20 NPK Kg ha -1 (F 2) and<br />

found at par with 50:25:25 NPK Kg ha -1 (F 3) and the highest B: C ratio (2.22) was also observed with<br />

the application <strong>of</strong> fertilizer level 60:30:30 NPK Kg ha -1 (F 4).<br />

Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming,<br />

INM, soil-microorganisms-plant interactions<br />

539 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Interaction effect: The interaction effect between spacing and fertilizer levels were found to be non<br />

significant in grain yield, straw yield and economics <strong>of</strong> the treatments.<br />

Conclusion<br />

From present investigation it is concluded that among the different treatments, 45 cm × 5 cm spacing<br />

was found productive and pr<strong>of</strong>itable as compared to 30 cm × 10 cm and found at par with 22.5 cm<br />

×10 cm. Similarly, among different fertilizer levels application <strong>of</strong> 60:30:30 NPK Kg ha -1 found better<br />

References<br />

Korir, A. K. 2019. Effects <strong>of</strong> fertilization and spacing on growth and grain yields <strong>of</strong> finger millet<br />

(Eleusinecoracana) in Ainamoi, Kericho County (Doctoral dissertation, KeMU).<br />

Swathi, B., Murthy, V. R. K., Rekha, M. S., and Lalitha, K. J. 2020. Performance <strong>of</strong> pearl millet as<br />

influenced by plant geometry and sowing windows. J. Pharmacog. Phytochem., 9(2), 1898-<br />

1900.<br />

T4-41P-1480<br />

Effect <strong>of</strong> Polymulching on Dalley Chilli in Eastern Himalayan Region<strong>of</strong> West<br />

Bengal<br />

Pranab Barma*, Novin Chamling, M. W. Moktan, F. H. Rahman and B.D. Kharga<br />

Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Kalimpong, Uttar Banga Krishi Viswavidylya, Kalimpong, WB- 734301<br />

* ICAR-Agricultural Technology Application Research Institute Kolkata,<br />

Sector III, Salt Lake, Kolkata- 700097<br />

*pranab.barma@gmail.com<br />

Dalley chilli is one <strong>of</strong> the most valued spices crops in entire Himalayan region <strong>of</strong> Kalimpong<br />

district due to its high pungency (10,0000 to 35,0000 SHU) and taste. The crop is generally<br />

grown during the period <strong>of</strong> middle <strong>of</strong> March to first week <strong>of</strong> July. During the growth period,<br />

prevailing <strong>of</strong> unfavourable condition such as heavy rainfall, water stagnant, frequent leaching<br />

loss <strong>of</strong> micronutrient from soil resulting to micro-nutrient deficiency, excessive weed growth and<br />

heavy infestation <strong>of</strong> pests and diseases hampers the crop growth and yield. Polymulching is one<br />

<strong>of</strong> the novel approaches for horticulture as it reduces soil moisture loss, suppress weed growth,<br />

increases radiation and water use efficiencies which directly effect on crop yield. Therefore, a<br />

study on the impact <strong>of</strong> polymulching was conducted at NICRA adopted village Paiyong, under<br />

Krishi Vigyan Kendra <strong>of</strong> Kalimpong during the year 2022 with an objective to enhance the<br />

production <strong>of</strong> Dalleychilli with maximum returns to the farmers. Finding <strong>of</strong> the trials suggests<br />

540 | Page Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming, INM, soilmicroorganisms-plant<br />

interactions


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

that Dalleychilli under polymulching condition recorded maximum yield (20.58 q/ha) and yield<br />

attributing characters and highest economic return BCR ratio(4.46)over open field condition<br />

(control). Thus, Polymulching in Dalleychilli perhaps a boon for enhancing production as it also<br />

plays ameliorate role over biotic and abiotic stress in Plants.<br />

T4-42P-1506<br />

A Study on Resilience <strong>of</strong> Soil Health through Fertigation and Nutrient<br />

Management in Tomato<br />

Minnu John 1* , M. Elayarajan 2 , G. Jayalekshmi 1 and P. S.Bhindhu 1<br />

1 Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Kottayam, Kerala, India 686 566<br />

2 Associate Pr<strong>of</strong>essor, Tamil Nadu AgriculturalUniversity, Coimbatore, India 641 003<br />

* minnu.4.john@gmail.com<br />

Poor understanding <strong>of</strong> the soil-plant relationships has led to the mismanagement <strong>of</strong> resources,<br />

especially fertilizers and water. This may end up in cascading effect on nature. Hence techniques<br />

that can pose minimal threat to the environment without compromising the plant growth, yield,<br />

and quality parameters needed to be adopted as a measure <strong>of</strong> resilience to revive the soil heath.<br />

Tomato is a crop that responds well to fertilizers and irrigation. The drip fertigation method<br />

which supplies nutrients to the plant roots directly through irrigation has proved to be very<br />

significant in improving nutrient uptake which finally results in enhancement <strong>of</strong> growth and<br />

yield <strong>of</strong> tomato crop (Ankush et al., 2017). Nutrient ratios may be optimized to bring down the<br />

surplus application <strong>of</strong> fertilizers.<br />

Methodology<br />

A pot experiment was conducted at Department <strong>of</strong> Soil Science and Agricultural Chemistry,<br />

Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatoreduring 2020-21 with TNAU Tomato Hybrid<br />

CO-3 as a test crop. This experiment was laid in a Completely Randomized Design with nine<br />

treatment combinations viz., absolute control without any fertilizers, control with solid fertilizers<br />

at the TNAU recommended dose <strong>of</strong> fertilizers, different nutrient ratios <strong>of</strong> N, P, K and N, P, K<br />

with Ca and B, and each treatment were replicated thrice. All the treatments were given nutrient<br />

supply through drip fertigation (except in the control treatments). The different treatments were<br />

Solid Fertilizers @ 100% RDF (Control), 1:1:1 NPK Fertigation @ 100% RDN + Basal P<br />

(Solid) (75% RDF), 1:1:1 NPK Fertigation @ 100% RDN, 1:2:1 NPK Fertigation @ 100%<br />

RDN, 2:1:1 NPK Fertigation @ 100% RDN, 1:1:1 NPK Fertigation @100% RDN+Ca, 1:1:1<br />

NPK Fertigation @ 100% RDN+B, 1:1:1NPKFertigation@100%RDN+Ca+B and Absolute<br />

Control. Observations were made in different growth parameters like plant height, number <strong>of</strong><br />

Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming,<br />

INM, soil-microorganisms-plant interactions<br />

541 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

leaves plant -1 and plant fresh weight at the critical stages <strong>of</strong> tomato plant growth viz., vegetative,<br />

flowering, fruiting and harvesting stages.<br />

Results<br />

The plant height, number <strong>of</strong> leaves plant -1 and plant fresh weight increased across the treatments<br />

at all stages <strong>of</strong> growth. Among the treatments, 1:1:1NPK fertigation @ 100% RDN+ Ca+ B (T8)<br />

recorded the highest plant fresh weight and plant heightat all the growth stages. Plants in this<br />

treatment also had maximum number <strong>of</strong> leaves plant -1 during the flowering, fruiting and harvest<br />

stages. The least growth <strong>of</strong> plant at all growth stages <strong>of</strong> tomato was observed in the absolute<br />

control (T9).<br />

The results indicated that the plant growth was significantly influenced by the nutrient ratios as<br />

well as method <strong>of</strong> fertilizer application. The fertigated plants had higher plant growth than those<br />

in the control (T1 and T9). The enhanced growth might be due to the increased cell division and<br />

elongation at higher levels <strong>of</strong> N and due to the inclusion <strong>of</strong> boron and calcium. The present<br />

findings are also in agreement with the findings <strong>of</strong>Solaimalai et al. (2005), Aruna et al.<br />

(2007),Haque et al. (2011), Sajad et al. (2018) and Kale et al. (2019) who reported increased<br />

plant growth due to better utilization <strong>of</strong> applied nutrients and water by the plants under drip<br />

fertigationas compared to the conventional method <strong>of</strong> irrigation.<br />

Conclusion<br />

The study revealed thatamong the methods <strong>of</strong> fertilizer application employed, drip<br />

fertigationwith water soluble fertilizer based on crop growth stage was found to be the most<br />

effective, which had a pronounced and significant effect on the growth <strong>of</strong> tomato plant as<br />

compared to soil application <strong>of</strong> fertilizer. Supply <strong>of</strong> 1:1:1 NPK (100% RDN) together with Ca<br />

+B (T8) was the best cost-effective nutrient combination for improved growth <strong>of</strong> tomato crop<br />

under fertigation. The roles and importance <strong>of</strong> calcium and boron in tomato plant growth were<br />

also proved by the results <strong>of</strong> this experiment. The inclusion <strong>of</strong> calcium and boron in the<br />

fertigation schedule may be henceforth pondered. The results also indicated that the stage wise<br />

application <strong>of</strong> nutrients through fertigation required lesser quantity <strong>of</strong> nutrients. Thus, in practice,<br />

it helps to avoid the unnecessary application <strong>of</strong> fertilizers, again saving nutrients and money and<br />

also maintains the soil environmental quality and health.<br />

542 | Page Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming, INM, soilmicroorganisms-plant<br />

interactions


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Details <strong>of</strong> Treatment and Total amount <strong>of</strong> nutrients supplied at critical growth stages based<br />

on TNAU CPG (2020).<br />

Treatment<br />

Total amount <strong>of</strong> nutrients supplied per pot at<br />

critical growth stages<br />

N(g)<br />

P2O5(g)<br />

K2O<br />

(g)<br />

Ca(mg)<br />

T 1 Solid Fertilizers @ 100% RDF (Control) 2.31 8.30 2.21 - -<br />

T 2<br />

1:1:1 NPK Fertigation @ 100% RDN + Basal P<br />

(Solid) (75% RDF)<br />

B(mg)<br />

5.59 11.8 5.59 - -<br />

T 3 1:1:1 NPK Fertigation @ 100% RDN 5.59 5.59 5.59 - -<br />

T 4 1:2:1 NPK Fertigation @ 100% RDN 2.15 7.31 2.14 - -<br />

T 5 2:1:1 NPK Fertigation @ 100% RDN 5.64 7.97 1.75 - -<br />

T 6 1:1:1 NPK Fertigation @100% RDN+Ca 3.92 9.01 2.79 0.58 -<br />

T 7 1:1:1 NPK Fertigation @ 100% RDN+B 5.59 11.8 5.59 - 0.38<br />

T 8 1:1:1NPKFertigation@100%RDN+Ca+B 5.59 11.8 5.59 0.58 0.38<br />

T 9 Absolute Control - - - - -<br />

*TNAU recommended dose <strong>of</strong> fertilizers- 200:250:250 NPK kg ha -1<br />

References<br />

Ankush, A., Singh, V. and Sharma, S. K. 2017.Response <strong>of</strong> tomato (SolanumlycopersicumL.) to<br />

fertigation by irrigation scheduling in drip irrigation system. J. Appl. Nat. Sci., 9(2),<br />

1170-1175.<br />

Aruna, P., Sudagar, I., Manivannan, M., Rajangam, J. and Natarajan, S. 2007. Effect <strong>of</strong><br />

fertigation and mulching for yield and quality in tomato cv. PKM-1. Asian J. Hortic.<br />

2(2): 50-54.<br />

Gupta,A. and Shukla,V. 1977.Response <strong>of</strong> tomato (Lycopersiconesculentum Mill.) to plant<br />

spacing, nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium fertilization. Indian J. Hortic., 34(3): 270-<br />

276.<br />

Haque, M., Paul, A. and Sarker, J. 2011. Effect <strong>of</strong> nitrogen and boron on the growth and yield <strong>of</strong><br />

tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum M.). Int. J. Bio-Resour. Stress Manag. 2 (3):277-282.<br />

Kale, K., Pawar, D. and Shinde, M. 2019. "Effects <strong>of</strong> fertigation on yield, quality and nutrient<br />

use <strong>of</strong> hybrid tomato when cultivated in Inceptisols." Indian Society <strong>of</strong> Soil Salinity and<br />

Water Quality (Registered under Societies Registration Act XXI <strong>of</strong> 1860) Editorial Board<br />

11 (1):125-129.<br />

Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming,<br />

INM, soil-microorganisms-plant interactions<br />

543 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Sajad, S., Ashraf, M.I., Hussain, B., Sajjad, M., Sattar, S., Adnan, M., Saeed, M.S., Ismail, M.,<br />

Ali, H.S. and Abdullah, M. 2018. Foliar application effect <strong>of</strong> boron, calcium and nitrogen<br />

on vegetative and reproductive attributes <strong>of</strong> tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L). J. Agri.<br />

Sci. Food Res. 9(1):199.<br />

Solaimalai, A., Baskar, M., Sadasakthi,A. and Subburamu, K. 2005. Fertigation in high value<br />

crops–a review. Agric. Rev. 26 (1):1-13.<br />

T4-43P-1524<br />

Phenological and Quality Response <strong>of</strong> Gram (CicerArietinum L.) to Foliage-<br />

Applied Fertilizers<br />

Sharad Shikandar Jadhav<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Agronomy, Post Graduate Institute, Mahatma Phule Krishi Vidyapeeth,<br />

Rahuri- 413 722, Dist- Ahmednagar, Maharashtra, India.<br />

India is also the largest gram-importing country in the world. There is a need to augment the<br />

productivity <strong>of</strong> grams to meet the requirement. Farmers could rely very well on pr<strong>of</strong>it by<br />

growing gram because <strong>of</strong> its high market demand and price. It is very imperative to develop<br />

improved technologies for enhancing the productivity <strong>of</strong> gram. Foliar application <strong>of</strong> watersoluble<br />

fertilizers along with soil application has several advantages in supplementing the<br />

nutritional requirement <strong>of</strong> crops, correcting nutrient deficiencies, and providing muchneedednutrients<br />

during stages <strong>of</strong> high nutrient demand in the crop. Foliar nutrition is recognized<br />

as an important method <strong>of</strong> fertilization in modern agriculture. New-generation special fertilizers<br />

have been introduced exclusively for foliar feeding and fertilization. Water soluble fertilizers<br />

have different ratios <strong>of</strong> N, P, and K which are highly water soluble and amenable for foliar<br />

nutrition (Jaybalet al., 1999). Spraying <strong>of</strong> micronutrient to correct the nutritional deficiencies <strong>of</strong><br />

the plant were in vogue, since early time, but the foliar application <strong>of</strong> macronutrients was not<br />

tried on a large scale. Today rapid development <strong>of</strong> efficient spraying equipment, the availability<br />

<strong>of</strong> various forms <strong>of</strong> highly water-soluble fertilizers, and the availability <strong>of</strong> different grades <strong>of</strong><br />

fertilizers, the practice <strong>of</strong> foliar feeding <strong>of</strong> nutrients has become a viable option for obtaining a<br />

better yield <strong>of</strong> crops. Therefore, the phenological response <strong>of</strong> gram-to-foliage-applied fertilizers<br />

and the quality response <strong>of</strong> gram-to-foliage-applied fertilizers were studied in this experiment.<br />

Methodology<br />

The field experiment was carried out during 2020-21 at the experimental farm <strong>of</strong> Cotton<br />

Research Scheme, VNMKV, Parbhani. The experiment was laid out in a Randomized block<br />

544 | Page Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming, INM, soilmicroorganisms-plant<br />

interactions


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

design with eight treatments and three replications. There were eight treatments viz, T1 is RDF<br />

(No spray), T2 is RDF + 1% urea spraying, T3 is RDF + 1% DAP spraying, T4 is RDF + 1%<br />

19:19:19 (N,P,K) spraying, T5 is RDF + 1% 00:52:34 (N,P,K) spraying, T6 is RDF + 13:00:45<br />

(N,P,K) spraying, T7 is RDF + 1% 13:40:13 (N,P,K) spraying and T8- control (no RDF, no<br />

spray). Foliar application <strong>of</strong> fertilizers (1%) is done at the flowering and pod development stage.<br />

The treatments were allotted randomly in each replication. Therecommendeddose<strong>of</strong>fertilizer<br />

(25:50:25 NPK kg ha -1 ) was applied at the time <strong>of</strong> sowing through Urea, SSP, and MOP. The<br />

recommended cultural practices and plant protectionmeasureswereproperlytakenfrom<br />

timetotime.The plants were used for measuring phenological characteristics like plant height, the<br />

number <strong>of</strong> branches plant and number <strong>of</strong> nodule plants, the seed index by taking 100 seeds, and<br />

weight for working out the seed index on electric balance.Protein content was determined by<br />

multiplying the percent <strong>of</strong> N in the grain sample by a constant factor <strong>of</strong> 6.25 as described by<br />

A.O.A.C. (1975).The statistical method <strong>of</strong> analysis <strong>of</strong> variance was used for analyzing the data<br />

and the “F” test <strong>of</strong> significance was used for testing the null hypothesis to determine whether the<br />

observed treatment effects were real and discernible from chance effects.<br />

Results<br />

Data in respect <strong>of</strong> plant height and number <strong>of</strong> branches plant -1 influenced by different treatment.<br />

The plant height (cm)differed significantly due to different foliar applications <strong>of</strong> fertilizers in<br />

gram, T4 - RDF + 1% 19:19:19 NPK spraying at flowering and pod development recorded<br />

significantly highest plant height (59.73) cm which was found at par with T2 - RDF + 1% Urea<br />

spraying at flowering and pod development (58.77) cm however it was significantly higher than<br />

all other treatments. Significantly lowest (42.87) cm plant height was recorded with T8 - Control<br />

(No RDF, No spray). In the present study, the data revealed an increase in plant height through<br />

foliar application <strong>of</strong> 19:19:19and urea may be attributed to increasing the N status in the plant<br />

system.<br />

The number <strong>of</strong> branches plant -1 <strong>of</strong> gram was significantly influenced due to different foliar<br />

fertilizers application, T4 - RDF + 1% 19:19:19 NPK spraying at flowering and pod development<br />

recorded a significantly higher number <strong>of</strong> branches (24.20) which was found at par with T5 -<br />

RDF + 00:52:34 NPK spraying at flowering and pod development (23.40) however, it was<br />

significantly higher than all other treatments. significantly the lowest number <strong>of</strong> branches (13.19)<br />

recorded with T8 - Control (No RDF, No spray). The maximum number <strong>of</strong> branches might be<br />

due to the increased number <strong>of</strong> nodes and the development <strong>of</strong> plants due to the treatment effect<br />

and increase in the availability <strong>of</strong> nitrogen which encouraged the carbohydrate synthesis in<br />

grams as there was the availability <strong>of</strong> applied nitrogen. Data on the number <strong>of</strong> nodule plant -1 as<br />

Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming,<br />

INM, soil-microorganisms-plant interactions<br />

545 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

influenced by various treatments. The mean number <strong>of</strong> nodule plant -1 was not influenced<br />

significantly by various foliar applications <strong>of</strong> fertilizers in gram. However, the mean number <strong>of</strong><br />

nodule plant -1 at 30, 45, 60, 75, and 90 DAS were 16.98, 36.16, 40.47, 20.81, and 9.74<br />

respectively. The seed index was not influenced significantly due to foliage-applied fertilizers.<br />

The highest seed index (8.53 g) was recorded with T5 - RDF + 1% 00:52:34 (NPK) spraying at<br />

flowering and pod development stage followed by T4 - RDF + 1% 19:19:19 (NPK) spraying at<br />

flowering and pod development (8.42 g) and T7 - RDF + 1% 13:40:13 (NPK) spraying at<br />

flowering and pod development (8.27 g). The lowest seed index (7.20 g) was recorded with T4 -<br />

Control (No RDF, No spray). The protein content (%) differed significantly due to different<br />

foliage applied fertilizers in gram, T4- RDF + 1% 19:19:19 NPK spraying at flowering and pod<br />

development recorded significantly highest protein content (19.68%) which was found at par<br />

with T7 - RDF + 1% 13:40:13 (NPK) spraying at flowering and pod development (19.37%) and<br />

T3- RDF + 1% DAP (NPK) spraying at flowering and pod development (18.75%). Significantly<br />

lowest (16.87%) protein content recorded with T8 - Control (No RDF, No spray). An increase in<br />

protein content may be due to the most important role <strong>of</strong> nitrogen in plants is mainly in its<br />

presence in the nucleic acid which is the protein structure. In addition, nitrogen is also found in<br />

chlorophyll molecules. Chlorophyllconverts sunlight energy into assimilates through<br />

photosynthesis. Therefore, the nitrogen supply to the plant will influence the amount <strong>of</strong> protein.<br />

Conclusion<br />

The foliage application <strong>of</strong> 1% 19:19:19 (NPK) or 1% 00:52:34 (NPK) or 1% 13:40:13 (NPK) spraying at<br />

flowering and pod development stage along with RDF was found beneficial and productive for improving<br />

phenological characters <strong>of</strong> a gram. For higher quality gram foliage application <strong>of</strong> 1% 19:19:19 (NPK) or<br />

1%, 13:40:13 (NPK) or 1% DAP along with RDF was found beneficial.<br />

References<br />

A. O. A. C. 1975. Association <strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong>ficial Analytical chemist, Washington, D.C. U.S.A.<br />

Jaybal, A., Revathy, M. and Saxena, M. G. 1999. Effect <strong>of</strong> foliar nutrition on nutrient uptake pattern in<br />

soybean. Andhra Agric. J. 46:243-244.<br />

546 | Page Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming, INM, soilmicroorganisms-plant<br />

interactions


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Plant height (cm), number <strong>of</strong> branches plant -1 , seed index (g) and protein content (%) as<br />

influenced by foliage applied fertilizers<br />

Treatment<br />

Plant height<br />

(cm)<br />

Number <strong>of</strong><br />

branches plant -1<br />

Seed<br />

Index (g)<br />

Protein<br />

Content<br />

(%)<br />

T 1 - RDF (no spray) 47.47 15.60 7.70 17.18<br />

T 2 - RDF + 1% Urea spraying 58.77 18.00 7.71 18.43<br />

T 3 - RDF + 1% DAP spraying 54.34 19.40 7.75 18.75<br />

T 4- RDF + 1% 19:19:19 (NPK) spraying 59.73 24.20 8.42 19.68<br />

T 5 - RDF + 1% 00:52:34 (NPK) spraying 47.93 23.40 8.53 17.50<br />

T 6 - RDF + 1% 13:00:45 (NPK) spraying 49.34 21.10 7.84 17.81<br />

T 7 - RDF + 1% 13:40:13 (NPK) spraying 54.37 20.80 8.27 19.37<br />

T 8 - Control (No RDF, No spray) 42.87 13.19 7.20 16.87<br />

S. E. (m) + 1.15 0.76 0.35 0.36<br />

CD at 5% 3.47 2.31 NS 1.10<br />

General Mean 51.85 19.46 7.93 18.19<br />

Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming,<br />

INM, soil-microorganisms-plant interactions<br />

T4-44P-1548<br />

Assessment <strong>of</strong> Bio-Fertilizers and Phosphorus Levels on Productivity and<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>itability <strong>of</strong> Green Gram (Vigna Radiata L.)<br />

Manoj Kumar, P. K. Choudhary and Ajeet Kumar<br />

CRA Programme, KVK Supaul, BAU, Sabour, Bhagalpur (BIHAR)<br />

An On-farm trial was conducted in the Supaul district during the two consecutive summer<br />

seasons<strong>of</strong> 2020 and 2021 respectively on sandy soil. For this ten farmer’splots <strong>of</strong> different<br />

villages Fakirna (Raghopur), Immamganj (Raghopur), Modhra (Kishanpur), Andauli<br />

(Kishanpur) Bella (Supaul), and Sadanandpur (Saraigarh) were selected. The Moong variety<br />

IPM-02-04 with three technology optionsopted with 10 replications. Farmer’s practice: Sowing<br />

<strong>of</strong> Moong without seed treatment by R.culture and no application <strong>of</strong> PSB and phosphorous.<br />

Technology option I: Seed treatment by R.culture 0.5 liter/ha + application <strong>of</strong> 0.75liters PSB/ha<br />

+ 75% RDF i.e 15 kg N and 30 kg phosphorous/ha. Technology option II: Seed treatment by<br />

R.culture @ 0.5 liter/ha + 100% RDF i.e 20 kg nitrogen and 40 kg phosphorous/ha. The result so<br />

far obtained revealed that the maximum grain yield i.e 12.4 q/ha recorded by technology option I<br />

i.e sowing <strong>of</strong> moong by the seed treatment R.culture plus the application <strong>of</strong> 75% RDF i.e 15 kg<br />

nitrogen and 30 kg phosphorous plus 0.75 liter PSB/ha whereas minimum grain yield i.e 6.9 q/ha<br />

547 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

recorded by the Farmers practice i.e sowing <strong>of</strong> moong without seed treatment by R.culture and<br />

no. application <strong>of</strong> PSB and phosphorous. Technology option I and technology option II were<br />

statically at par and significantly higher in comparison to farmers’ practice. Results show that the<br />

yield attributing characters viz., Grain yield, pod length, grain per pod, etc., Growth parameters,<br />

and economics were also found significantly higher in T. option Iand T. option II in comparison<br />

with farmers’ practice.<br />

T4-45P-1563<br />

Effect <strong>of</strong> Long-Term Fertilizer Application on Crop Productivity <strong>of</strong> Wheat<br />

(Triticum aestivum L.) Grown in Vertisols<br />

Jyoti Bangre*, K.S. Bangar, Subhash, Bharat Singh and B.B. Parmar<br />

JNKVV, College <strong>of</strong> Agriculture, Jabalpur 482004 Madhya Pradesh<br />

* bangrejyoti9@gmail.com<br />

Integrated nutrient management (INM) not only reduces the nutrient gap between addition and<br />

removal, but also ensures higher nutrient use efficiency, sustainability, and reduced soil pollution<br />

(Chaudhary et al., 2020).Long-term fertiliser experiments are the primary source <strong>of</strong> information<br />

for determining the effect <strong>of</strong> cropping systems on soil quality attributes and they are carried out<br />

to monitor the impact <strong>of</strong> fertiliser input management on soil fertility and the long-term viability<br />

<strong>of</strong> a production system. It provides valuable information on the effect <strong>of</strong> continuous application<br />

<strong>of</strong> different levels <strong>of</strong> fertiliser nutrients, alone and in combination with organic manure, on soil<br />

fertility and crop productivity under intensive cropping.<br />

Methodology<br />

By keeping these views, a field experiment was conducted at the All India Coordinated Research<br />

Project on Long Term Fertilizer Experiment (AICRP-LTFE) Research farm, Department <strong>of</strong> Soil<br />

Science and Agricultural Chemistry, JNKVV, Jabalpur during the rabi season (the year 2017 and<br />

2019) on wheat (GW-366). The treatment comprised <strong>of</strong>T1-50% NPK, T2-100% NPK, T3-<br />

150NPK, T4-100% NPK+Hand Weeding T5-100%NPK+Zn, T6-100% NP, T7-100% N, T8-100%<br />

NPK+FYM @5t ha -1 , T9-100% NPK-S and T10-Control.<br />

Results<br />

The two-year mean data indicated that the highest grain yield <strong>of</strong> wheat was obtained with (6156,<br />

6570 kg ha -1 ) 100% NPK + FYM treatment (T8) followed by (6006, 6216 kg ha -1 ) with 150%<br />

NPK treatment (T3). The lowest grain and straw yield was found in the (1406, 3945 kg ha -1 )<br />

548 | Page Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming, INM, soilmicroorganisms-plant<br />

interactions


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

control plot. Progressively, it was increased (4244, 5470 kg ha -1 ) in treatment T1receiving suboptimal<br />

fertilizer dose 50% NPK. The results also indicated that even if 50% NPK <strong>of</strong> the<br />

recommended optimal dose was applied was found much more beneficial in comparison to the<br />

application <strong>of</strong> imbalanced nutrient application. Similarly, it was also found that 100% N<br />

treatment (T7) resulted in 1779 and 5350 kg ha -1 grain and straw yield <strong>of</strong> wheat. It was<br />

progressively increased when P and Knutrients were included in fertilizer schedule.<br />

Reference<br />

Chaudhari, S.K., Biswas, P.P. and Kapil, H. 2020. Soil Health and Fertility. In the Soils <strong>of</strong><br />

India. Springer. 215-231.<br />

T4-46P-1618<br />

Studies on Effect <strong>of</strong> NPK, Bulb Size and Spacing on Yield <strong>of</strong> Pran (Top<br />

Onion) under Temperate Rainfed Conditions<br />

Tahir Saleem, Tariq Sultan, Nazir Ahmad Mir and H.A. Malik<br />

Krishi Vigyan Kendra Bandipora, SKUAST Kashmir (J&K)-193502<br />

Pran (Allium x cornutumClementi ex Visiani) is a triploid viviparous species <strong>of</strong> genus Allium,<br />

extensively grown in Kashmir from times immemorial (Singh et al., 1967, Klaas and Friesen<br />

2002). Pran is a cool season spice crop which grows well in mild climatic conditions. Being a<br />

long duration, rainfed and less labour intensive, this crop is cultivated on l<strong>of</strong>ty hills where<br />

irrigation facilities seldom exist. It is more cold-hardy than onion and tolerates frost to a greater<br />

extent. Pran is traditionally cultivated in Kashmir and it is very popular as a spice and condiment<br />

due to its tasty bulbs and leaves. It is highly relished in Kashmiri kitchens in the preparation <strong>of</strong><br />

soups, meat and salads. In the absence <strong>of</strong> scientific information with regard to appropriate<br />

nutrient dosage, spacing and bulb size for propagation in pran, it is difficult to reckon and realize<br />

the objective <strong>of</strong> higher yield. The present investigation was carried out to find the appropriate<br />

nutrient dose, bulb size and spacing for yield maximization in Pran.<br />

Methodology<br />

The experiment was conducted in two successive years and laid out in random block design with<br />

27 treatments and 3 replications as detailed below. Three factors viz., NPK, spacing and bulb size<br />

were taken for evaluation, each at three different levels forming 27 treatment combinations.<br />

Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming,<br />

INM, soil-microorganisms-plant interactions<br />

549 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

No. <strong>of</strong> levels 1 II III<br />

NPK F 1:80:60:40 Kgha -1 F 2:100:80:60 Kgha -1 F 3:120:100:80NPK Kgha -1<br />

Spacing S 1:20 cm x 10 cm S 2: 20 cm x 15 cm S 3:20 cm x 20 cm<br />

Bulb Size B 1 : Small(2.5-5.0 g) B 2: Medium (5.1-7.5g) Large (7.6-10 g)<br />

Observations were recorded on various growth, yield and quality attributes <strong>of</strong> top onion. Ten<br />

competitive plants were selected at random from each treatment and tagged for recording<br />

observations. Mean values for all the characters were worked out. The bulbs obtained from<br />

uprooting ten randomly selected plants were weighed expressed as bulb weight per plant in<br />

grams for all the treatment combinations in all the replications. The bulb yield per hectare was<br />

computed based on bulb yield per plot and expressed in tonnes per hectare.<br />

Results<br />

The study showed that maximum fresh bulb weight <strong>of</strong> 16.44 g was registered in treatment<br />

combination F3B3S3 (120:100:80 NPK kg ha-1 + 7.6-10.0 g bulb size and 20 x 20 cm spacing)<br />

after pooling the two-year data. This was followed by treatment combination F3B2S3<br />

(120:100:80 NPK kg ha-1 + 5.1-7.5g bulb size and 20 x 20 cm spacing) which registered the<br />

fresh bulb weight <strong>of</strong> 16.34 g in pooled analysis. Lowest fresh bulb weight <strong>of</strong> 8.04 g was<br />

registered in treatment combination F1B1S1. Maximum fresh yield <strong>of</strong> 37.72 t ha -1 was registered<br />

in treatment combination F2B2S2 after pooling the two-year data. This was followed by<br />

treatment combination F2B3S2 which registered the fresh yield <strong>of</strong> 37.70 t ha-1 in pooled<br />

analysis. Lowest fresh yield <strong>of</strong> 28.03 t ha-1 was registered in treatment combination F1B1S1.<br />

Number <strong>of</strong> bulbs per plant, bulb length, bulb diameter, fresh bulb weight and fresh weight <strong>of</strong><br />

bulbs per plant were significantly increased by using medium weight and large bulb weight in<br />

both seasons. This could be a result <strong>of</strong> the positive effect <strong>of</strong> available food reserves in large<br />

bulbs, which might have improved crop establishment and consequently increased growth<br />

characters and subsequently yield attributes like number <strong>of</strong> bulbs per plant, bulb length, bulb<br />

diameter, fresh bulb weight and fresh weight <strong>of</strong> bulbs per plant. Bulb size is related to planting<br />

density and smaller bulbs are formed at closer spacing. Close spacing <strong>of</strong> individual plants suffer<br />

much from competition and the crop may be improved in too wide spacing; however, the yield<br />

per hectares may be reduced because <strong>of</strong> reduction in plant number. The results are in accordance<br />

with findings <strong>of</strong> Faheema et al. (2009) Hussain et al. (2001)<br />

550 | Page Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming, INM, soilmicroorganisms-plant<br />

interactions


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Conclusion<br />

It was observed that different combinations <strong>of</strong> NPK, bulb size and spacing exhibited a significant<br />

influence on all the parameters <strong>of</strong> top onion. Treatment F2B2S2 (100:80:60 NPK kg ha -1 + 5.1-<br />

7.5 g bulb size and 20 x 15 cm spacing) proved superior over rest <strong>of</strong> the treatments with respect<br />

to yield.<br />

References<br />

Faheema, S., Ahmed, N., Hussain, K., Narayan, S., Chattoo, M. A. 2009. Response <strong>of</strong> long day<br />

onion cv. Yellow Globe to different levels <strong>of</strong> nitrogen phosphorus and potassium under<br />

temperate conditions <strong>of</strong> Kashmir Valley. Asian J. Hortic. 4 (1): 131-133.<br />

Hussain, S.W., Ishtiaq, M. and Hussain, S.A. 2001. Effect <strong>of</strong> different bulb sizes and planting<br />

dates on green leaf production on onion (Allium cepa L.). J. Biolog. Scie., 1 (5): 345-<br />

347.<br />

Klass, M. and Freisen, N. 2002. Molecular markers in Allium. In: Rabinowitch, H.D and Currah.<br />

L (eds) Allium Crop Science: Recent Advances. CAB International. 159-185.<br />

Singh, F., Brat, S.V. and Khoshoo, T.N. 1967. Natural Triploidy in Vivi<br />

Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming,<br />

INM, soil-microorganisms-plant interactions<br />

551 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-<br />

CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Bulb Size<br />

(g)<br />

20x10<br />

(S1)<br />

Effect <strong>of</strong> NPK, Bulb size and Spacing on fresh Yield (tha -1 ) <strong>of</strong> Pran (Top Onion)<br />

F1<br />

80:60: 40 Kgha -1 NPK<br />

Spacing(cm)<br />

20x15<br />

(S2)<br />

20x20<br />

(S3)<br />

Mean<br />

-1<br />

Fresh Yield (tha )<br />

20x10<br />

(S1)<br />

F2<br />

100:80:60 NPK Kgha -1<br />

F3<br />

120:100:80 NPKKgha -1<br />

Spacing(cm) Mean Spacing(cm) Mean<br />

20x15<br />

(S2)<br />

2.5-5.0 (B1) 28.03 29.1 27.21 28.11 33.31 34.13 32.6 29.55 33.93 34.34 32.83 28.50 28.72<br />

5.1-7.5 (B2) 29.66 30.88 28.7 29.75 36.12 36.72 35.08 35.69 35.69 36.65 35.05 34.85 33.43<br />

7.6-10 (B3) 30.02 31.31 29.49 30.27 35.93 36.82 35.45 30.27 35.73 36.46 34.58 35.54 33.85<br />

Mean 29.23 30.43 28.46 29.37 33.78 34.81 33.42 33.65 35.00 31.94 31.94 32.96<br />

CD (p< 0.05)<br />

NPK 0.28<br />

Bulb Size 0.28<br />

NPK X Bulb Size 0.50<br />

Spacing 0.28<br />

NPK x Spacing 0.50<br />

Bulb Size x Spacing 0.50<br />

NPK x Bulb Size x Spacing 0.86<br />

20x20<br />

(S3)<br />

20x10<br />

(S1)<br />

20x15<br />

(S2)<br />

20x20<br />

(S3)<br />

Overall<br />

Mean<br />

Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming, INM, soil-microorganisms-plant interactions<br />

552| Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Stress Management in Wheat Crop through Foliar Spray <strong>of</strong> TGA Agro-<br />

Chemical<br />

R. S. Rathore, Dayanand, P. P. Rohilla*, S. K. Singh and V. Nagar<br />

Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Abusar-Jhunjhunu (Raj.)<br />

Swami Keshwanand Rajasthan Agricultural University, Bikaner (Raj.)-333001 (India).<br />

* drpprohilla@gmail.com<br />

T4-47P<br />

Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) is the second most important cereal crop after rice in providing food<br />

and nutritional security to the masses in India. It is the most widely cultivated cereal crop which is<br />

the largest contributor with nearly 30% <strong>of</strong> the world grain production and 50% <strong>of</strong> the world grain<br />

trade. FAO estimated that the world would require additional 198 million tonnes <strong>of</strong> wheat by 2050<br />

to accomplish the future demands, for which wheat production need to be increased by 77% in the<br />

developing countries. Regarding the global climate change in the past few decades, the impact <strong>of</strong><br />

rising temperature on wheat production is gaining concern worldwide. Heat and drought are the<br />

major abiotic stress limiting the wheat production, which are common in semi-arid and arid<br />

region. Keeping the above problem in view total 80 demonstrations on wheat crop were conducted<br />

at farmer’s field in NICRA village Bharu, Jhunjhunu (Rajasthan) during rabi season 2017-18 to<br />

2020-21 for four consecutive years to assess the effect <strong>of</strong> TGA (Thio Glycolic Acid) agrochemical<br />

foliar spray on stress management in wheat crop. TGA is the organic compound, <strong>of</strong>ten called<br />

Mercapto acetic acid (MAA). It contains both thio and carboxylic acid functional groups. It is used<br />

in salt forms including calcium thioglycolate and sodium thioglycolate. Farming situation is<br />

irrigated and soil is sandy loam in Jhunjhunu district. The sowing <strong>of</strong> wheat crop was done from<br />

second week to last week <strong>of</strong> November under irrigated condition. Two foliar spray <strong>of</strong> TGA<br />

agrochemical (100 ppm) on 15 days interval for two times at first and second fortnight in February<br />

month was done by knapsack /power sprayer. Crop was harvested during first/ second week <strong>of</strong><br />

April. The data analyzed revealed that the average gross return and net return was `107636 and<br />

`96495; `59111 and `49043 <strong>of</strong> foliar spray demonstration and local check, respectively. It could be<br />

concluded that average production (12.11 %) and net pr<strong>of</strong>it <strong>of</strong> wheat crop (20.52%) were<br />

increased by foliar spray <strong>of</strong> TGA under field conditions. The total cost <strong>of</strong> TGA agro-chemical<br />

material along with two foliar spray cost was about `500/ha. Hence, two foliar spray <strong>of</strong> TGA agrochemical<br />

at tillering and milking stage in wheat crop could be added in package <strong>of</strong> practices and<br />

motivate the farmers for adoption <strong>of</strong> new techniques for stress management in wheat crop and<br />

getting economic returns.<br />

Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming,<br />

INM, soil-microorganisms-plant interactions<br />

553 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

T4-48P<br />

Biochar: An Effective Soil Amendment to Reduce Emissions and Increase<br />

Crop Productivity<br />

Nitin M. Kumbhar, Narendra M. Tiwatne and Madhav D. Gholkar*<br />

* madhav.gholkar@wotr.org.in<br />

Agricultural soils are mainly treated with chemical inputs to replenish the soil nutrients<br />

consumed by the plants. However, the loss <strong>of</strong> soil organic carbon, one <strong>of</strong> the main constituents to<br />

keep soils fertile and healthy, is never given much importance while managing agricultural soils.<br />

On the other hand, most farmers burn their crop residues in fields that release greenhouse gases.<br />

Burning cotton crop residues is a regular practice in Maharashtra's cotton-growing regions as it<br />

cannot be used as fodder or decomposed into manure for soil incorporation. Converting the<br />

cotton feedstock into biochar and using it for field application is an environmentally sustainable<br />

and economically viable way to manage the crop residue. A field experiment was conducted to<br />

see the effect <strong>of</strong> various combinations <strong>of</strong> biochar, chemical fertilizers, and city waste compost on<br />

wheat soybean cropping system crop productivity. A randomized block design was used to see<br />

the effects <strong>of</strong> biochar on crop productivity. Our study reveals that the application <strong>of</strong> 2.5 tones/ha<br />

<strong>of</strong> biochar increases the crop productivity <strong>of</strong> Soybean by 10 to 20% andwheat by 38 to 55%<br />

compared with conventional farmer practice without biochar application. This also helps in<br />

reducing the GHG emission from crop residue burning. Village-level production and use <strong>of</strong><br />

biochar prepared from cotton feedstock have appeared as an effective technique to avoid the<br />

emissions from agriculture and improve soil health by adding stable carbon in the form <strong>of</strong><br />

biochar.<br />

Temporal Changes in Soil Properties under Intensive Cotton Growing<br />

Vertisols<br />

S. B. Girdekar 1* , P. Chandran 1 , D. Vasu 1 , M.V. Venugopalan 2 and P. Tiwari 1<br />

1 ICAR-National Bureau <strong>of</strong> Soil Survey and Land Use Planning, Nagpur – 440033, India<br />

2 ICAR-Central Institute for Cotton Research, Nagpur<br />

* shubhamsoils1994@gmail.com<br />

T4-49P<br />

The investigation was carried out to evaluate the temporal changes in soil properties under<br />

intensive cotton growing Vertisols in the CICR research farm, Panjri village <strong>of</strong> Nagpur<br />

554 | Page Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming, INM, soilmicroorganisms-plant<br />

interactions


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

(Maharashtra). In the research farm <strong>of</strong> CICR, cotton is being cultivated under different<br />

management practices. Here we have discussed about comparisons <strong>of</strong> the soil properties for<br />

knowing the effect <strong>of</strong> land use and management on the dynamic properties <strong>of</strong> soil. For that<br />

purpose, we have selected three different locations and representative soils were studied under<br />

different management practices viz.1) Organiccultivation with the application <strong>of</strong> vermicompost<br />

and green manuring 2) A soil with inorganic cultivation with the application <strong>of</strong> recommended<br />

dose <strong>of</strong> fertilizer used along with insecticides, and 3) Virgin or undisturbed soil with no crop or<br />

fallow. The soil properties <strong>of</strong> these 3 sites were compared for changes due to management<br />

interventions for surface (0-25cm) and subsurface (25-50cm) layers. The comparisons <strong>of</strong><br />

temporal data indicated that most <strong>of</strong> the dynamic soil properties changed with time in organic,<br />

inorganic and undisturbed soils under cotton cultivation. The sHC decreased in all soils<br />

whereas, organic carbon increased over a period <strong>of</strong> time (23 and 10 %, 23 and 26 %) in surface<br />

and subsurface soils <strong>of</strong> organic and inorganic systems. Bulk density decreased about 15 and 6<br />

% in surface and sub-surface layers <strong>of</strong> soils in organic system. Calcium carbonate has<br />

decreased in organic as well as undisturbed systems whereas in intensively cultivated soil it has<br />

increased.The study shows that the organically managed soil management system had better<br />

yield as compared to other soil management systems. The prevalent system <strong>of</strong> management<br />

practices increased the organic carbon in soils and decreased the BD, sHC and pH <strong>of</strong> soils and<br />

inorganic carbon tends to increase in soils. These trends <strong>of</strong> changes in soil properties could be a<br />

threat to the cotton cultivation. These issues need to be handled with proper management<br />

intervention.<br />

T4-50P<br />

Effect <strong>of</strong> Different Levels <strong>of</strong> Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potash on Yield, Yield<br />

Attributes and Economic <strong>of</strong> Bt. Cotton under Rainfed Conditions<br />

P. D. Vekariya, V. D. Vora*, S. C. Kaneria, D. S. Hirpara, M.M. Talapada, K. S. Jotangiya<br />

and R.J. Chaudhary<br />

Main Dry Farming Research Station, Junagadh Agricultural University, Targhadia<br />

(Rajkot-360 023)<br />

* vdvora@jau.in<br />

An experiment was under taken on “Nutrient management in Bt. cotton under rain fed conditions<br />

“on medium black clayey soil <strong>of</strong> North Saurashtra region <strong>of</strong> Gujarat at Dry farming research<br />

station, Junagadh Agricultural University, KukadaduringKharif 2013-14 to 2020-21. The<br />

experiment was laid out in factorial randomizedblock design with three replications. The<br />

Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming,<br />

INM, soil-microorganisms-plant interactions<br />

555 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

experiment consists <strong>of</strong> three levels <strong>of</strong> nitrogen viz.; N60- 60 kg N/ha, N80- 80 kg N/ha and N100-<br />

100 kg N/ha, two levels <strong>of</strong> phosphorus P0- 0 kg P2O5/ha andP30- 30 kg P2O5/ha and two levels <strong>of</strong><br />

potash K0- 0 kg K2O/ha and K60- 60 kg K2O/ha thus, twelve treatment combinations. On the<br />

basis <strong>of</strong> pooled results the seed cotton and stalk yield <strong>of</strong> Bt.cotton were significantly influenced<br />

by the various levels <strong>of</strong> nitrogen, phosphorus and potash. The application <strong>of</strong> nitrogen 100 kg,<br />

phosphorus 30 kg and potash 60 kg/ha significantly increased the seed cotton yield (2081, 2051<br />

and 2039 kg/ha, respectively) and stalk yield (3192, 3177 and 3193 kg/ha, respectively) <strong>of</strong><br />

Bt.cotton.While in growth and yield attributing parameters like plant height, number <strong>of</strong><br />

monopodia, sympodia and balls/plant significantly increased with the application <strong>of</strong> 100 kg N/ha<br />

and 30 kg P2O5/ha, but application <strong>of</strong> 60 kg K2O/ha significantly increased only number <strong>of</strong><br />

sympodia/plant. The post harvest soil fertility like pH, EC and organic carbon content <strong>of</strong> soil<br />

were not influenced significantly due to different levels <strong>of</strong> nitrogen, phosphorus and potash.<br />

Significantly higher value <strong>of</strong> available status <strong>of</strong> nitrogen and phosphorus in soil were recorded<br />

with application <strong>of</strong> 100 kg N, 30 kg P2O5 and 60 kg K2O, but application <strong>of</strong> 60 kg K2O/ha<br />

significantly increased available potash content in soil. Maximum net return was recorded<br />

withapplication <strong>of</strong> nitrogen 100 kg, phosphorus 30 kg and potash 60 kg/ha, respectively.<br />

Effect <strong>of</strong> Long Term INM On SOC Stock, Yield Sustainability and Its<br />

T4-51P<br />

Relationship with Soil Quality Attributes Under Cotton + Greengram (1:1)<br />

Intercropping System in Vertisols<br />

V.V. Gabhane 1 , P.R. Ramteke 1 , R.S. Patode 1 , M.M. Ganvir 1 , A.R. Tupe, A.B. Chorey and<br />

G. Ravindra Chary 2<br />

1 AICRP for Dryland Agriculture, Dr. Panjabrao Deshmukh Krishi Vidyapeeth,<br />

Akola-444 104, Maharashtra<br />

2 AICRPDA, ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

The present study was conducted during 2021-2022 on a long term field experiment initiated<br />

during 1987-88 at AICRP for Dryland Agriculture, Dr. Panjabrao Deshmukh Krishi Vidyapeeth,<br />

Akola, Maharashtra, with eight treatment combinations including a control, two sole organics<br />

treatments, two sole inorganics, and three treatments <strong>of</strong> integration <strong>of</strong> organics to substitute for<br />

the fertilizer N requirement in cotton + greengram (1:1) intercropping system under semi-arid<br />

agro-ecosystem in Vidarbha region <strong>of</strong> Maharashtra. The results after 35 th cycle revealed that<br />

partial substitution <strong>of</strong> nitrogen either by farmyard manure (FYM) or gliricidia along with<br />

chemical fertilizers improved the soil quality attributes and crop productivity in terms <strong>of</strong><br />

556 | Page Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming, INM, soilmicroorganisms-plant<br />

interactions


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

sustainable yield index and system productivity. The rate <strong>of</strong> change in SOC stock under different<br />

nutrient management practices was calculated, which revealed that, the rate <strong>of</strong> change was<br />

negative for control, and sole organic treated plots, while it was positive in rest <strong>of</strong> the treatments<br />

with highest build-up in INM treatments. The sustainable yield index (SYI) was higher with<br />

partial substitution <strong>of</strong> nitrogen either by farmyard manure (FYM) or gliricidia along with<br />

chemical fertilizers. Furthermore, the system productivity under treatment substitution <strong>of</strong><br />

nitrogen either through gliricidia along with chemical fertilizers, or by farmyard manure (FYM)<br />

was 80% higher over control and 14 and 19% higher over 100% RDF, respectively. The Pearson<br />

correlation matrix between soil properties and system productivity revealed that, all the assessed<br />

soil properties were highly positively correlated with system productivity except for BD, pH and<br />

EC. Additionally, the management sensitive biological properties <strong>of</strong> soil such as, MBC, DHA,<br />

Alkaline phosphatase also had strong positive correlation with available nutrients and SOC.<br />

Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming,<br />

INM, soil-microorganisms-plant interactions<br />

557 | Page


Resource conservation and rainfed<br />

agriculture<br />

Theme– 4a


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Theme – 4a: Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture<br />

List <strong>of</strong> <strong>Extended</strong> Summaries<br />

S.No. Title First Author ID<br />

1. Zero tillage-based in-situ rice straw management to<br />

reduce in GHGs emission and build up labile carbon<br />

pool in lowland rice<br />

2. Conjuctive use <strong>of</strong> organic and inorganic fertilizers for<br />

rabi sorghum<br />

3. Response <strong>of</strong> sorghum to different levels <strong>of</strong> nitrogen and<br />

phosphorus under conserved soil moisture in Ghed area<br />

<strong>of</strong> Gujarat<br />

4. In-situ rainwater harvesting techniques and<br />

diversification <strong>of</strong> cropping system for climate resilient<br />

agriculture in Bundelkhand region<br />

5. Gliricidia Green Leaf Manure as a Source <strong>of</strong> Potassium<br />

for Improvement in Soil Quality and Sustaining<br />

Rainfed Cotton Productivity in Vertisols <strong>of</strong> Central<br />

India<br />

6. Conjunctive use <strong>of</strong> zeolite and urea to minimize<br />

nitrogen loss and enhance nutrient availability and<br />

maize productivity in Alfisols<br />

7. Effect <strong>of</strong> conservation agriculture and balanced<br />

nutrition on system productivity, pr<strong>of</strong>itability and<br />

mitigating GHGs emission in maize-horsegram<br />

sequence in rainfed Alfisols<br />

8. Effect <strong>of</strong> conservation agriculture and mineral nitrogen<br />

levels on soil aggregate stability indices and associated<br />

carbon in rainfed maize (Zea mays L.) - pigeonpea<br />

(Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.) crop rotation under<br />

Alfisols<br />

9. Growth and Yield <strong>of</strong> Groundnut as influenced by<br />

Moisture Stress at different Phenophases<br />

10. Impact <strong>of</strong> Zero tillage over conventional tillage in<br />

Kushinagar District <strong>of</strong> Utter Pradesh<br />

11. Nutrient Dynamics in Conservation Agriculture under<br />

Rainfed Conditions<br />

12. Co-application <strong>of</strong> biochar and inorganic fertilizer<br />

improves soil fertility and crop productivity in maizegroundnut<br />

cropping system in semi-arid Alfisols<br />

13. Assessment <strong>of</strong> soil physical properties from different<br />

blocks <strong>of</strong> Jaipur district, Rajasthan, India<br />

14. Appraisal <strong>of</strong> some soil physical properties and<br />

available micronutrients under organic and<br />

conventional farming systems in an Inceptisol<br />

Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture<br />

SP Parida<br />

VM Amrutsagar<br />

VD Vora<br />

T4a-01O-1256<br />

T4a-02O-1242<br />

T4a-03O-1012<br />

Yogeshwar Singh T4a-03aO -<br />

1512<br />

VV Gabhane<br />

V Girijaveni<br />

Sumanta Kundu<br />

AK Indoria<br />

Radha Kumari<br />

Ashok Rai<br />

PS Prabhamani<br />

KC Nataraja<br />

Surykant sharma<br />

Priyanka Meena<br />

T4a-04O-1151<br />

T4a-05R-1244<br />

T4a-06R-1227<br />

T4a-07R-1015<br />

T4a-08R-1187<br />

T4a-09R-1443<br />

T4a-10R-1235<br />

T4a-11R-1127<br />

T4a-12P-1031<br />

T4a-13P-1301<br />

15. Conservation agriculture approach as climate change Pooja Jena T4a-14P-1580<br />

558 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

S.No. Title First Author ID<br />

mitigation<br />

16. Conservation Agriculture in Himalayan States <strong>of</strong> India:<br />

Prospects and Research Challenges Ahead<br />

17. Direct seeding in Rice: A resource Conservation<br />

Technology in Scarce Rainfall zone <strong>of</strong> Kurnool district,<br />

A.P.<br />

18. Effect <strong>of</strong> bioregulators along with organics on growth<br />

and yield <strong>of</strong> Gundumalli (Jasminum sambacait.)<br />

19. Effect <strong>of</strong> life saving irrigation on yield and economics<br />

<strong>of</strong> different kharif and rabi crops under dryland<br />

conditions<br />

20. Effect <strong>of</strong> long-term conservation agriculture on labile<br />

and total soil organic carbon fractions <strong>of</strong> rainfed pearl<br />

millet-based cropping systems <strong>of</strong> India<br />

21. Effect <strong>of</strong> organic and inorganic nutrient management<br />

practices on growth and yield <strong>of</strong> maize under subtropical<br />

kandi area Jammu region<br />

22. Effect <strong>of</strong> carbon sources <strong>of</strong> nutrients on yield; and soil<br />

properties <strong>of</strong> soybean<br />

23. Effect <strong>of</strong> paddy straw mulching and tillage on growth<br />

and yield <strong>of</strong> Pea (Pisum sativum L.)<br />

24. Effect <strong>of</strong> Tillage and Residue Management on Yield <strong>of</strong><br />

blackgram – rabi sorghum sequence grown on<br />

Inceptisol under rainfed condition<br />

25. Effect <strong>of</strong> tillage practices and mulching on Rabi<br />

sorghum crop under rainfed condition<br />

26. Effect <strong>of</strong> tillage practices and mulching operations on<br />

productivity <strong>of</strong> maize under dryland conditions<br />

27. Effect <strong>of</strong> tillage practices and nitrogen fertilizer levels<br />

on soil total carbon, bulk density and porosity in<br />

rainfed maize-pigeonpea crop rotation under semi-arid<br />

tropical climate<br />

28. Effect <strong>of</strong> various organic sources <strong>of</strong> nutrients on growth<br />

and yield <strong>of</strong> tomato<br />

29. Energy Efficient tillage and nutrient management for<br />

rabi sorghum on Inceptisol<br />

30. Enhancing productivity <strong>of</strong> rainfed maize through<br />

different planting methods and moisture conservation<br />

practices in Shivalik foothill region <strong>of</strong> Punjab<br />

31. Escaping moisture stress in steep slopes by altering the<br />

time <strong>of</strong> planting (early sowing) in Garden Pea<br />

32. Growth and Growth Parameters <strong>of</strong> Soybean influenced<br />

by different Land Configuration and Crop Residue<br />

Management Practices<br />

Raman Jeet Singh T4a-15P-1061<br />

M Sudhakar<br />

V Velmurugan<br />

K Tiwari<br />

Amresh<br />

Chaudhary<br />

Brinder Singh<br />

Jawale<br />

V Akashe<br />

Zhimomi<br />

NJ Ranshur<br />

Arun Kumar<br />

Pramod Kumar<br />

AKIndoria<br />

SV Uphade<br />

SK Upadhye<br />

Mandeep Kaur<br />

Ajith Kumar<br />

Singh<br />

SS Kinge<br />

T4a-16P-1221<br />

T4a-17P-1467<br />

T4a-18P-1226<br />

T4a-19P-1205<br />

T4a-20P-1324<br />

T4a-21P<br />

T4a-22P-1460<br />

T4a-23P-1102<br />

T4a-24P-1338<br />

T4a-25P-1014<br />

T4a-26P-1059<br />

T4a-27P-1091<br />

T4a-28P-1207<br />

T4a-29P-1540<br />

T4a-30P-1578<br />

T4a-31P-1317<br />

559 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

S.No. Title First Author ID<br />

33. Impact <strong>of</strong> application <strong>of</strong> Organics, Bi<strong>of</strong>ertilizers on Soil<br />

Nutrient status and Quality parameter <strong>of</strong> Rabi Sorghum<br />

34. Impact <strong>of</strong> zinc and iron enriched organic manures on<br />

rabi grain sorghum<br />

35. Improvement <strong>of</strong> soil fertility and Productivity by use <strong>of</strong><br />

Green Manuring<br />

36. Influence <strong>of</strong> Different In-Situ Soil Moisture<br />

Conservation Techniques in Maize under Rainfed<br />

Agro-Eco System <strong>of</strong> Jammu Region<br />

37. Influence <strong>of</strong> medicinal crops used as groundcover<br />

management <strong>of</strong> guava orchard on soil properties <strong>of</strong><br />

Northern India<br />

38. Influence <strong>of</strong> natural farming on soil properties, crop<br />

protection and production <strong>of</strong> quality produce in<br />

Sugarcane<br />

39. In-situ moisture conservation techniques for timely<br />

sowing <strong>of</strong> Wheat crop in Rabi season under Kandi<br />

areas <strong>of</strong> District Kathua<br />

40. Nutrient Management in Soybean Based Double<br />

Cropping Systems under Residual Moisture<br />

41. Nutrient Management practices in finger millet under<br />

zero tillage conditions in rice fallows<br />

42. Partial Substitution <strong>of</strong> Nutrients through Gliricidia<br />

Green Manuring to Cotton under Conservation Tillage,<br />

a Cost-Effective Alternative for Soil Quality,<br />

Productivity and Economic Sustainability <strong>of</strong> Rainfed<br />

Cotton in Vertisols <strong>of</strong> Central India<br />

43. Performance <strong>of</strong> castor to different levels <strong>of</strong> nitrogen<br />

and phosphorus under conserved soil moisture in Ghed<br />

area <strong>of</strong> Gujarat<br />

44. Performance <strong>of</strong> maize (Zea mays) under late planting<br />

condition in organic production mode in rainfed<br />

condition <strong>of</strong> Meghalaya<br />

45. Response <strong>of</strong> Soybean (Glycine max (L).) to the<br />

Organic Sources <strong>of</strong> Nutrients<br />

46. Soil Moisture Availability in Alfisol as Influenced by<br />

Crop Residue Application under Minimum Tillage<br />

47. Soil moisture stress alters the abundance <strong>of</strong> maize root<br />

associated bacteria<br />

48. Soil organic carbon sequestration potential under the<br />

changing climatic scenarios in different<br />

agroecosystems <strong>of</strong> India<br />

49. Sustaining Cotton Productivity and Soil Health with<br />

Conjoint Use <strong>of</strong> Organic and Inorganic Sources under<br />

Cotton based Intercropping Systems on Vertisols in<br />

Kuruva Mounika<br />

T Bhagavatha<br />

Priya<br />

Debesh singh<br />

Jai Kumar<br />

Manpreet Singh<br />

KV Ramana<br />

Murthy<br />

Vishal Sharma<br />

Pradeep Kumar<br />

Y Sandhya Rani<br />

BA Sonune<br />

DS Hirpara<br />

Amit Anil<br />

Shahane<br />

AK Gore<br />

K Sammi Reddy<br />

M Manjunath<br />

K Nishant Sinha<br />

DV Mali<br />

T4a-32P-1314<br />

T4a-33P-1276<br />

T4a-34P<br />

T4a-35P-1325<br />

T4a-36P-1250<br />

T4a-37P-1318<br />

T4a-38P-1461<br />

T4a-39P-1329<br />

T4a-40P-1387<br />

T4a-41P-1304<br />

T4a-42P-1047<br />

T4a-43P-1289<br />

T4a-44P-1155<br />

T4a-45P-1230<br />

T4a-46P-1055<br />

T4a-47P-1196<br />

T4a-48P-1305<br />

Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture<br />

560 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

S.No. Title First Author ID<br />

Central India<br />

50. Sustaining Soil Health through Organic Farming RS Choudhary T4a-49P-1427<br />

51. Type <strong>of</strong> organic manure and biochar affected crop<br />

production and soil health in maize-black gram system<br />

under changing climate<br />

52. Vermicomposting-A module for Sustainable soil<br />

Management in South Garo Hills, Meghalaya, India<br />

53. Weedy rice: A threat to sustainable rice production<br />

under direct seeding<br />

54. Yield and nutrient uptake <strong>of</strong> direct seeded rice under<br />

different tillage and nutrient management practices<br />

55. Zero Tillage Technique with High Yielding Variety <strong>of</strong><br />

Wheat Cultivation as Compared to Traditional practices <strong>of</strong><br />

farmers field in Front line demonstration under NICRA <strong>of</strong><br />

Morena district M.P.<br />

56. Paired row method <strong>of</strong> cultivation in maize – a water<br />

conservation technology for sustainable yields and<br />

higher net returns<br />

57. Improving productivity <strong>of</strong> Taramira (Eruca sativa<br />

Mill.) under conserved soil moisture in arid<br />

environments<br />

58. Influence <strong>of</strong> Organic and Inorganic Nutrients on<br />

Nitrogen & Potassium Fractions In Relation to Yield <strong>of</strong><br />

Elephant Foot Yam - Blackgram System<br />

Shaon Kumar<br />

Das<br />

Titus Dalang<br />

T4a-50P-1261<br />

T4a-51P-1176<br />

V. Anjaly T4a-52P-1137<br />

P Manoj Kumar<br />

RS Tomar<br />

K Ravi Kumar<br />

M Patidar<br />

KV Aswin<br />

T4a-53P-1546<br />

T4a-54P-1411<br />

T4a-55P-1579<br />

T4a-56P-1567<br />

T4a-57P-1367<br />

561 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

T4a-01O-1256<br />

Zero Tillage-based in-situ rice Straw Management to Reduce in GHGs Emission and<br />

Build Up Labile Carbon Pool in Lowland Rice<br />

S. P. Parida, P. Bhattacharyya, S.R Padhy, A. Das, S. Swain and S. K. Nayak<br />

ICAR- National Rice Research Institute, Cuttack Odisha-753006, India<br />

Total rice straw production currently stands at 731 million tonnes, with a distribution <strong>of</strong> 1.7,<br />

3.9, 20.9, 37.2 and 667.6 million tonnes in Oceania, Europe, Africa, America, and Asia<br />

country respectively. In India, rice straw production is not lesser than 126.6 million tonnes<br />

(Bhattacharyya et.al., 2019). Handling the huge straw is an issue particularly in north-west<br />

India where wheat is shown just after 20-25 days <strong>of</strong> rice harvest. Lack <strong>of</strong> economically viable<br />

alternative options to utilize straw, the rice farmers in India especially from the northern<br />

states <strong>of</strong> Punjab and Haryana choose to burn the straw in their fields. Even more alarming is<br />

the fact that the practice <strong>of</strong> rice straw burning is spreading rapidly in eastern Indian states like<br />

West Bengal, Odisha, Bihar, and Jharkhand. Nearly 16% <strong>of</strong> crop residues are burnt on farms<br />

in India <strong>of</strong> which 60% is rice straw for recent decades, rice straw burning is <strong>of</strong> serious<br />

concern as it causes sever air pollution, nutrient and biodiversity losses. Recent estimates<br />

showed that from November to December in last 4-5 years, straw burn contributed to nearly<br />

70% <strong>of</strong> air pollution in the national capital region <strong>of</strong> India. Burning primarily causes the<br />

emission <strong>of</strong> harmful gases and particulate matter which increases air pollution and<br />

greenhouse gas/ carbon footprint significantly. So, we need to find out economically viable,<br />

socially acceptable, and eco-friendly solutions for the alternative uses <strong>of</strong> rice straw. In-situ<br />

management is one <strong>of</strong> the viable options <strong>of</strong> straw management. However, in-situ retention<br />

and subsequent incorporation in soil may cause GHGs emission in lowland rice along with<br />

carbon build up. The objective <strong>of</strong> the study was to assess the effect the in-situ straw<br />

management on soil carbon pools, enzymatic activities and GHGs emission in lowland rice.<br />

Methodology<br />

We have conducted a field experiment at ICAR-NRRI experimental fields (B13, 14 ab Block)<br />

during Kharif season 2021 for in-situ management <strong>of</strong> rice straw. Four treatment viz., (i)<br />

Immediate incorporation <strong>of</strong> rice straw after harvesting (IIRS) (T1), (ii) Zero tillage (with<br />

glyphosate spray) (T2), (iii) Spreading <strong>of</strong> straw over the field (T3) and (iv) Zero tillage with<br />

straw retention (T4) (without glyphosate spray) were imposed in the field randomly with five<br />

replications as shown in both table and figure. The soil labile carbon pools- microbial<br />

biomass carbon (MBC); readily mineralizable carbon (RMC), enzymatic activities {βglucosidase,<br />

dehydrogenase activity (DHA) and fluorescein diacetate activity (FDA)} and<br />

GHGs {carbon dioxide (CO 2), methane (CH 4), nitrous oxide (N 2O)} were estimated in all treatments<br />

after the imposition <strong>of</strong> the treatments at an interval <strong>of</strong> 3, 8,13, 18, 23, 28, 33 and 38 days.<br />

Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture<br />

562 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Results<br />

The readily mineralizable carbons (RMC) and microbial biomass carbons (MBC) were<br />

increased from 8 days <strong>of</strong> treatment imposition to 28 days then decreased at 38 days<br />

irrespective <strong>of</strong> treatments. The labile carbon and soil enzymatic activities (β-glucosidase,<br />

DHA and FDA) were found higher in IIRS (T1), followed by SRS (T3), ZT (T2) and ZT+SR<br />

(T4) (Table-2). The MBC and RMC values for IIRS, ZT, SRS and ZT+SR treatments were<br />

found to be 338.7, 305.9, 323.5, 285.7 µg Cg -1 and 243.6, 218.3, 230.5, 210 µg Cg -1<br />

respectively. The β-glucosidase activity for IIRS, ZT, SRS and ZT+SR was found to be 14.9,<br />

11.9, 13.9 and 11.1 respectively. FDA and DHA for the same treatments vis-à-vis IIRS, ZT,<br />

SRS and ZT+SR were 4.2, 3.1, 3.7, 2.7 and 122.4, 100.9, 110.8, 94.3 respectively. The<br />

methane emission was higher in IIRS (T1) flowed by SRS (T3), ZT (T2) and ZT+ST (T4)<br />

(Figure 2). The CO2 and CH4 emissions were increased from 3 to 18 days <strong>of</strong> treatment<br />

imposition and then decreased slowly. The CO 2 and N 2O (Figure 2) emissions trends were<br />

the same. However, in the treatment <strong>of</strong> IIRS, the methane emission was higher than that <strong>of</strong><br />

SRS. All the GHGs (CO 2, CH 4 and N 2O) emissions were relatively less in zero tillage (ZT).<br />

Enzymatic activity details after different treatment imposition<br />

Treatment<br />

Microbial<br />

biomass carbon<br />

(µg C g -1 )<br />

Readily<br />

mineralizable<br />

carbons (µg C<br />

g -1 )<br />

β-<br />

glucosidase<br />

(µg pNP g -<br />

1<br />

h -1 )<br />

Fluorescein<br />

diacetate activity<br />

(µg fluorescein g -<br />

1<br />

h -1 )<br />

Dehydrogen<br />

ase activity<br />

(µg TPF g -1<br />

d -1 )<br />

IIRS 338.7 243.6 14.9 4.2 122.4<br />

ZT 305.9 218.3 11.9 3.1 100.9<br />

SRS 323.5 230.5 13.9 3.7 110.8<br />

ZT+SR 285.7 210.0 11.1 2.7 94.3<br />

Conclusion<br />

In-situ management <strong>of</strong> straw should be promoted through zero-tillage based practices rather<br />

than direct incorporation in the field as it reduces the GHGs emissions and build labile carbon<br />

pools in the soils during decomposition straw in the field. These practices also have good<br />

climate change mitigation potential.<br />

563 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

GHGs flux after different treatment imposition in different days interval<br />

References<br />

Kaur, D., Bhardwaj, N.K. and Lohchab, R.K., 2017. Prospects <strong>of</strong> rice straw as a raw material<br />

for paper making. Waste Management, 60, pp.127-139.<br />

Bhattacharyya, P., Bisen, J., Bhaduri, D., Priyadarsini, S., Munda, S., Chakraborti, M., Adak,<br />

T., Panneerselvam, P., Mukherjee, A.K., Swain, S.L. and Dash, P.K., 2021. Turn the<br />

wheel from waste to wealth: Economic and environmental gain <strong>of</strong> sustainable rice<br />

straw management practices over field burning about India. Science <strong>of</strong> The Total<br />

Environment, 775, p.145896.<br />

Dash PK, Padhy SR, Bhattacharyya P, Pattanayak A, Routray S, Panneerselvam P, Nayak<br />

AK, Pathak H. Efficient lignin decomposing microbial consortium to hasten rice-straw<br />

composting with moderate GHGs fluxes. Waste and Biomass Valorization. 2022<br />

Jan;13(1):481-96.<br />

Otero-Jimenez V, del Pilar Carreno-Carreno J, Barreto-Hernandez E, van Elsas JD, Uribe-<br />

Velez D. Impact <strong>of</strong> rice straw management strategies on rice rhizosphere microbiomes.<br />

Applied Soil Ecology. 2021 Nov 1;167:104036.<br />

Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture<br />

564 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

T4a-02O-1242<br />

Conjuctive use <strong>of</strong> Organic and Inorganic Fertilizers for Rabi Sorghum<br />

V. M. Amrutsagar, S. K. Upadhye, N. B. More, G. Ravindra Chary, Archana B. Pawar,<br />

D. K. Kathmale, I. R. Bagwan and B. S. Kadam<br />

AICRP for Dryland Agriculture, Main Center, Solapur- 413 002 Maharashtra<br />

zarssolapur@gmail.com<br />

It is the today’s need to select and prioritize climate resilient technologies that are sustainable<br />

for the rainfed and dryland areas. The technologies should minimize the effect <strong>of</strong> extreme<br />

climate events such as drought, flood, change in rainfall pattern, heat and cold waves, etc.<br />

Considering the climate change effects observed severe damage and risk in the cultivation <strong>of</strong><br />

rainfed and irrigated field crops. Organic + inorganic fertilizer management is a most<br />

appropriate system <strong>of</strong> agriculture (Sharma, 1992.) Similar to regenerative agriculture, that<br />

encourage healthy soils and crops through such a practices as untried recycling <strong>of</strong> organic<br />

matter (compost/ crop residues) crop rotation, proper tillage and minimum / optimum use <strong>of</strong><br />

inorganic fertilizers and pesticides. It is therefore the present investigation was undertaken<br />

with the objectives viz., to study the feasibility <strong>of</strong> use <strong>of</strong> crop residue, green loppings and<br />

FYM with and without inorganic fertilizers in the field and its subsequent effect on crop<br />

yield, to assess its effect on physico-chemical and biological properties <strong>of</strong> soil and to study<br />

the economics.<br />

Methodology<br />

A long-term field experiment was initiated during 1987-88 at All India Coordinated Research<br />

Project for Dryland Agriculture, Main Center, Solapur on medium black soil (Vertic<br />

Ustropepts). The experiment is continued for 35 years (2021-22) on the same site with ten<br />

treatments with three replications in Randomized Block Design without disturbing the<br />

original layout. The treatments tried are : T1 - 0 kg N ha -1 control, T2 - 25 kg N ha -1 urea, T3 -<br />

50 kg N ha -1 –urea, T 4 - 25 kg N ha -1 CR (crop residues-byre waste), T 5 - 25 kg N ha -1 –FYM<br />

(farm yard manure), T6 - 25 kg N ha -1 CR + 25 kg N ha -1 urea, T7 - 25 kg N ha -1 FYM +25<br />

kg N ha -1 urea, T8 - 25 kg N ha -1 CR+25 kg N ha -1 Leucaena loppings , T9 - 25 kg N ha -1<br />

Leucaena loppings, T 10 - 25 kg N ha -1 Leucaena loppings + 25 kg N ha -1 urea. The physicochemical<br />

properties <strong>of</strong> soil, rainwater use efficiency (RWUE) and nutrient uptake <strong>of</strong> rRabi<br />

sorghum were studied. The initial soil status was low in soil fertility (Ava. N- 137 and P 2O 5 –<br />

11.5 kg ha -1 ) and DTPA extractable micronutrients (mg kg -1 ) Fe (2.95), Zn (0.49) and Cu<br />

(0.50).<br />

565 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Results<br />

At 35 th year <strong>of</strong> experimentation the treatment T 7 (25 kg N ha -1 FYM+ 25 kg N ha -1 Urea) gave<br />

significantly higher grain (19.25 q ha -1 ) and stover (40.42 q ha -1 ) yield, net monetary returns<br />

(Rs. 39525 ha -1 ) with B: C ratio (2.25), RWUE (32.08 kg ha -1 mm -1 ). The nutrients uptake by<br />

Rabi sorghum as well as rain water use efficiency and residual soil fertility (major and micro<br />

nutrients) were also increased as shown in the table. The N fixers and P solubilizers count<br />

was more under Leucaena application either alone or with crop residue or FYM. Nishimura<br />

(1994) reported that green gram as a mulch-cum-manure to rabi sorghum increased the gross<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>it by 132 per cent. Conjoint use <strong>of</strong> FYM and chemical fertilizers on soybean-safflower<br />

sequence cropping showed that the half <strong>of</strong> recommended fertilizers (10 N + 40 P 2O 5 ha -1 + 6<br />

tonnes FYM) gave highest yield <strong>of</strong> soybean and safflower (Sharma, 1992). Reddy et al.<br />

(1991) also reported similar trend <strong>of</strong> results i.e., 75 per cent substitution <strong>of</strong> chemical N with<br />

use <strong>of</strong> Leucaena leucocphala gave higher bio mass and yield <strong>of</strong> sorghum.<br />

Conclusion<br />

From the above study it can be concluded that, the nitrogen requirement <strong>of</strong> rRabi sorghum<br />

can be fulfilled by conjoint use <strong>of</strong> organic (50 %) and inorganic fertilizers (50 %) or equally<br />

effective treatment i.e., 50 % N ha -1 through CR + 50% N ha -1 through Leucanea lopping<br />

which maintan the better soil health, RWUE and microbial count. This can be way forward to<br />

make organic farming in rainfed area that conserve natural resources and make farming more<br />

resilient and less dependent on chemical inputs.<br />

Effect <strong>of</strong> recycling <strong>of</strong> different organics on yield and RWUE by grain and stover <strong>of</strong> rabi<br />

Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture<br />

sorghum (2021-22)<br />

Treatment Yield (q ha -1 ) Cost <strong>of</strong><br />

Cult n<br />

Rs/ha<br />

Grain<br />

2021-<br />

22<br />

Stover<br />

2021-<br />

22<br />

Mean<br />

Grain<br />

(35years)<br />

Mean<br />

Stover<br />

(35years)<br />

Net<br />

Returns<br />

Rs/ha<br />

B:C<br />

Ratio<br />

RWUE<br />

(Kg<br />

ha -1<br />

mm -1 )<br />

0 kg N ha -1 –control 7.72 16.23 5.77 15.72 24595 3892 1.16 12.86<br />

25 kg N ha -1 –urea 8.65 18.07 7.60 20.62 24916 6944 1.28 14.41<br />

50 kg N ha -1 –urea 10.97 25.75 9.30 23.86 25238 16608 1.66 18.29<br />

25 kg N ha -1 –CR 9.28 19.48 8.11 20.62 28762 5469 1.19 15.46<br />

25 kg N ha -1 –FYM 10.29 21.53 9.03 22.38 31174 6748 1.22 17.14<br />

25 kg N ha -1 -CR +25 kg N ha -1<br />

–urea<br />

25 kg N ha -1 - FYM +25 kg N ha -<br />

1<br />

urea<br />

25 kg N ha -1 –CR +25 kg N ha -1<br />

–Leucaena loppings<br />

14.58 30.61 10.86 25.92 29083 24705 1.85 24.29<br />

19.25 40.42 12.84 28.21 31495 39525 2.25 32.08<br />

18.23 38.28 12.15 27.34 31967 35289 2.10 30.38<br />

25 kg N ha -1 -Leucaena loppings 8.61 18.09 8.23 20.30 27800 3983 1.14 14.36<br />

25 kg N ha -1 -Leucaena 12.26 25.76 10.80 24.54 28121 17130 1.61 20.44<br />

566 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

loppings+25 kg N ha -1 –urea<br />

SE+ 0.56 1.63 -- -- 2219.1 -- --<br />

CD at 5% 1.69 4.88 -- -- 6644.5 -- --<br />

Effect <strong>of</strong> treatments on soil chemical properties at harvest (2021-22).<br />

Treatments pH EC Available Nutrients<br />

(kg/ha)<br />

DTPA extractable<br />

micronutrients (ppm)<br />

N P K Fe Mn Zn Cu<br />

0 kg N ha -1 –control 7.96 0.47 119.00 16.18 681.00 2.55 4.29 0.18 0.52<br />

25 kg N ha -1 –urea 7.78 0.56 159.67 21.78 819.33 3.48 5.90 0.38 1.36<br />

50 kg N ha -1 –urea 7.95 0.58 168.67 24.38 883.00 4.34 6.45 0.32 1.26<br />

25 kg N ha -1 –CR 7.42 0.61 180.00 34.57 951.00 4.46 6.58 0.45 1.34<br />

25 kg N ha -1 –FYM 7.31 0.66 184.00 30.83 969.00 4.47 7.59 0.47 1.37<br />

25 kg N ha -1 -CR +25 kg N ha -1<br />

–urea<br />

25 kg N ha -1 - FYM +25 kg N ha -<br />

1<br />

urea<br />

25 kg N ha -1 –CR +25 kg N ha -1<br />

–Leucaena loppings<br />

7.20 0.68 190.00 31.43 974.33 4.65 7.65 0.60 1.49<br />

7.22 0.70 203.00 35.22 993.00 4.81 7.64 0.61 1.51<br />

7.20 0.74 203.67 39.31 996.00 4.72 8.00 0.63 1.54<br />

25 kg N ha -1 -Leucaena loppings 7.28 0.71 180.00 31.30 868.67 4.40 7.94 0.51 1.32<br />

25 kg N ha -1 -Leucaena loppings<br />

+25 kg N ha -1 –urea<br />

7.30 0.72 189.00 33.66 885.67 3.79 7.43 0.49 1.23<br />

SE+ 0.01 0.01 0.79 0.45 2.04 0.02 0.02 0.01 0.01<br />

CD at 5% NS NS 2.29 1.31 5.89 NS NS NS NS<br />

Initial Values (2013-14) 8.1 0.49 137 11.5 592 2.95 12.6 0.49 0.50<br />

References<br />

Nishimura, Y. 1994. An improved technology <strong>of</strong> rainfed farming in the semi arid tropics.<br />

Japanese J. Trop. Agri. 38:103<br />

Reddy, G. S., Venkateshwaralu, B., and. Vittal, K. P. R. 1991. Effect <strong>of</strong> substitution <strong>of</strong><br />

fertilizer nitrogen with subabul (Leucaena leucocephela) leaves on growth and yield <strong>of</strong><br />

sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) in an alfisol. Indian J. Agril. Sci. 61:316.<br />

Sharma, R. A. 1992. Efficient water use and sustainable production <strong>of</strong> rainfed soybean and<br />

safflower through conjunctive use <strong>of</strong> organic and fertilizers. Crop. Res.181.<br />

567 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

T4a-03O-1012<br />

Response <strong>of</strong> Sorghum to Different Levels <strong>of</strong> Nitrogen and Phosphorus under Conserved<br />

Soil Moisture in Ghed AREA <strong>of</strong> Gujarat<br />

V. D. Vora * , R. B. Thanki, P. D. Vekariya, S. C. Kaneriya and D. S. Hirpara<br />

Main Dry Farming Research Station, Junagadh Agricultural University, Gujarat, 360 023 India<br />

*vdvora@jau.in<br />

Sorghum (Sorghum bicolar) is the fifth most important world cereal following wheat, maize,<br />

rice, and barley, used for food, fodder, production <strong>of</strong> alcoholic beverages and bio fuels and is<br />

the dietary staple for more than 500 million people in 30 countries with an area <strong>of</strong> 40 million<br />

ha (Avilkumar et al., 2016). Sorghum, because <strong>of</strong> its drought resistance, is the crop <strong>of</strong> choice<br />

for dry regions and areas with unreliable rainfall. Sorghum is the third most widely grown<br />

crop in India after rice and wheat. However, it is the most important crop <strong>of</strong> the semi-arid<br />

tropics (SAT) in India and constitutes the staple food for a large proportion <strong>of</strong> the population.<br />

The sorghum is grown throughout India under rainfed conditions on an area <strong>of</strong> 3.84 million<br />

ha with annual production <strong>of</strong> 3.76 million tonnes and average productivity 979 kg/ha.<br />

Cultivation <strong>of</strong> sorghum on conserved moisture in Ghed area <strong>of</strong> Gujarat is a common practice.<br />

Sorghum is a highly nutrient exhaustive crop, therefore, to achieve sustainable higher<br />

productivity, maintenance <strong>of</strong> native soil fertility and health is necessary. Keeping in view,<br />

this experiment was planned to study the effect <strong>of</strong> nitrogen and phosphorus fertilization on<br />

yield <strong>of</strong> sorghum under conserved soil moisture in Ghed area <strong>of</strong> Gujarat.<br />

Methodolody<br />

A field experiment was conducted during the Semi-rabi season <strong>of</strong> 2016 to 2019 at Dry<br />

Farming Research Station, Junagadh Agricultural University, Ratia (Porbandar). The soil was<br />

medium in available nitrogen (258 kg/ha), medium in available phosphorus (45.27 kg/ha) and<br />

high in available potassium (710.0 kg/ha). The experiment was laid out in a factorial<br />

randomized block design taking 12 treatments combinations <strong>of</strong> 4 levels <strong>of</strong> nitrogen (0, 20, 40<br />

and 60 kg/ha) and 3 levels <strong>of</strong> phosphorus (0, 20 and 40 kg/ha) with 3 replications. The<br />

nitrogen was applied in two splits viz., 50 % as basal through ammonium sulphate and 50 %<br />

as top dressing at 45-50 DAS through urea by drilling in soil up to 10 cm depth, while<br />

phosphorus was applied as basal through single super phosphate as per treatments. The Gross<br />

and net plot size was 5.0 m X 2.7 m and 4.0 m X 1.8 m, respectively. Sorghum Gundari<br />

(Local) was sown at distance <strong>of</strong> 45 cm x 10 cm on 25 October 2016, 7 October 2017, 20<br />

September 2018 and 9 November 2019 under conserved soil moisture. The total rainfall<br />

received during the crop season (June to November) was 306, 270, 149 and 545 mm in 12,<br />

14, 8 and 18 rainy days in the year <strong>of</strong> 2016, 2017, 2018 and 2019, respectively. Data on<br />

growth, yield performance and economic <strong>of</strong> sorghum was pooled over 4 years.<br />

Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture<br />

568 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Results<br />

On the basis <strong>of</strong> four years pooled mean, plant height, grain and fodder yield was significantly<br />

affected by different levels <strong>of</strong> nitrogen as shown in table. Significantly highest plant height<br />

and fodder yield were recorded with application <strong>of</strong> 60 kg N/ha as compared to control, 20<br />

and 40 kg N/ha, while grain yield was recorded significantly highest with application <strong>of</strong> 60<br />

kg N/ha as compared to control and 20 kg N/ha, but it remained at par with 40kg N/ha.<br />

Among phosphorus levels, grain and fodder yield <strong>of</strong> sorghum was significantly influenced<br />

due to different levels <strong>of</strong> phosphorus and recorded significantly highest grain and fodder<br />

yield under application <strong>of</strong> 40 kg P2O5/ha as compared to control, but it remained at par with<br />

application <strong>of</strong> 20 kg P 2O 5/ha. Similarly maximum net returns <strong>of</strong> Rs. 25389/ha and B: C ratio<br />

<strong>of</strong> 1.93 were recorded under application <strong>of</strong> 60 kg N/ha followed by Rs. 23363/ha and B: C<br />

ratio <strong>of</strong> 1.87 under application <strong>of</strong> 40 kg N/ha. Whereas with the application <strong>of</strong> phosphorus,<br />

maximum net returns <strong>of</strong> Rs. 21563/ha and B: C ratio <strong>of</strong> 1.81 were recorded with application<br />

<strong>of</strong> 20 kg P2O5/ha.<br />

Growth, yield and economics <strong>of</strong> sorghum as influenced by nitrogen and phosphorus<br />

Treatments<br />

Nitrogen (kg/ha)<br />

Phosphorus (kg/ha)<br />

Conclusion<br />

levels under conserved soil moisture (Pooled mean <strong>of</strong> 4 years)<br />

On the basis <strong>of</strong> four years pooled results, it can conclude that higher grain and fodder yield<br />

and net returns from sorghum (Gundri Local) can be secured by application <strong>of</strong> 40 kg N and<br />

20 kg P 2O 5/ha in medium black clayey soil under conserved soil moisture in Ghed area <strong>of</strong><br />

Gujarat.<br />

Plant<br />

height<br />

(cm)<br />

Grain<br />

yield<br />

(kg/ha)<br />

Fodder<br />

yield<br />

(kg/ha)<br />

Net<br />

return<br />

( /ha)<br />

B:C<br />

ratio<br />

Control 77.3 774 1746 14344 1.56<br />

20 83.2 889 2002 19623 1.74<br />

40 89.6 972 2190 23363 1.87<br />

60 96.8 1020 2298 25389 1.93<br />

SEm+ 1.1 18 37<br />

CD (P=0.05) 3.2 50 104<br />

Control 86.0 872 1968 18995 1.73<br />

20 86.2 932 2099 21563 1.81<br />

40 88.1 937 2110 21468 1.80<br />

SEm+ 1.0 15 34<br />

CD (P=0.05) NS 50 104<br />

569 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

References<br />

Avilkumar, K., Satish, C., Praveen Rao, V., Uma Devi, M. and Ramulu, V. 2016. Drip<br />

irrigation levels influence on yield attributes, yield and water productivity <strong>of</strong> rabi<br />

sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench). In: <strong>Extended</strong> Summaries, Fourth<br />

International Agronomy Congress on Agronomy for Sustainable Management <strong>of</strong><br />

Natural Resources, Environment, Energy and Livelihood Security to Achieve Zero<br />

Hunger Challenge, 22–26 November 2016, Indian Society <strong>of</strong> Agronomy, Indian<br />

Council <strong>of</strong> Agricultural Research, New Delhi, India Vol.3: 118-120<br />

T4a-03aO -1512<br />

In-situ Rainwater Harvesting Techniques and Diversification <strong>of</strong> Cropping<br />

System for Climate Resilient Agriculture in Bundelkhand region<br />

Yogeshwar Singh, Rajiv Nandan and Sandeep Upadhyay<br />

College <strong>of</strong> Agriculture, Rani Lakshmi Bai Central Agriculture University, Jhansi,<br />

Uttar Pradesh. 284003, India<br />

Conspicuous to frequent climatic and hydrological droughts, the Bundelkhand region<br />

experiences severe agricultural droughts. Soils <strong>of</strong> these regions are shallow, gravelly and<br />

extremely porous with low organic matter and have poor water holding capacity. Much <strong>of</strong> the<br />

region suffers from acute ecological degradation due to top soil erosion and deforestation,<br />

leading to low productivity <strong>of</strong> the land. Thus, realizing the importance <strong>of</strong> rain water<br />

harvesting and diversified climate resilient cropping system in Bundelkhand regions, research<br />

entitled “In-situ rainwater management and crop diversification for climate resilient<br />

agriculture” was conducted. Attempts were made to generate information about the<br />

subsequent availability <strong>of</strong> in-situ rain water for the crop during the extended dry spell<br />

periods.<br />

Methodology<br />

Field experiment has been initiated during the year 2020-21 and 2021-22 at RLBCAU, Jhansi<br />

to standardize the Agro-techniques for efficient use <strong>of</strong> irrigation and rain water and crop<br />

diversification for climate resilient agriculture in Bundelkhand. The experiment was<br />

conducted in split plot design with five In-situ rainwater harvesting methods namely control<br />

(conventional practice); deep tillage; horizontal mulching; broad bed and furrow and ridge<br />

and furrow in main plot and three cropping systems namely groundnut – wheat; maize –<br />

mustard and sorghum – chickpea in sub-plot, replicated thrice. The experimental crops were<br />

managed as per standard package and practices.<br />

Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture<br />

570 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Results<br />

The system productivity in terms <strong>of</strong> wheat equivalent yield was maximum in ridge and<br />

furrow planting system (8644 kg/ha/yr) with the highest water productivity (2.78 kg grain/m 3<br />

water). Such an alteration in yield performance order could have been due to ease dissolution<br />

and accessibility <strong>of</strong> the N, influenced by the appreciable soil moisture at the beginning <strong>of</strong> the<br />

season. Among different cropping systems (groundnut-wheat, maize-mustard and sorghumchickpea),<br />

maize-mustard cropping sequence showed superiority for the highest water<br />

productivity (2.37) and net returns (Rs. 87,799 per ha), while groundnut-wheat exhibited<br />

maximum MEY (9119 kg/ha/yr).<br />

Effect <strong>of</strong> tillage practices on system and water productivity<br />

Kharif<br />

(Maize<br />

Equivalent<br />

Yield -t/ha)<br />

Rabi<br />

(Maize<br />

Equivalent<br />

Yield -t/ha)<br />

System<br />

productivity<br />

(MEYt/ha/yr)<br />

Water<br />

applied<br />

(m 3 /ha)<br />

%<br />

Water<br />

saving<br />

Water<br />

productivity<br />

(Kg<br />

grain/m 3<br />

water)<br />

Net<br />

returns<br />

(Rs/ha)<br />

A) In-situ rainwater harvesting methods (Main-plot)-05<br />

Deep tillage 3.77 4.37 8.12 3980 7.2 2.04 79571<br />

Residue<br />

mulching<br />

Broad bed &<br />

furrow<br />

Ridge and<br />

furrow<br />

Conventional<br />

Practice<br />

4.00 4.47 8.48 3820 11.0 2.22 84658<br />

3.87 4.43 8.30 3750 12.6 2.21 81524<br />

4.07 4.56 8.64 3110 27.5 2.78 86903<br />

3.55 4.38 7.94 4290 - 1.85 79400<br />

CD (P=0.05) 0.329 0.367 0.673 297 - 0.21 4158<br />

B) Cropping system (Sub-plot)-03<br />

Groundnut-<br />

Wheat<br />

Sorghum–<br />

Chick Pea<br />

Maize-<br />

Mustard<br />

4.401 4.718<br />

3.472 3.741<br />

3.684 4.886<br />

9.12 4600 - 1.98 79994<br />

7.21 3150 31.5 2.29 78240<br />

8.57 3620 21.3 2.37 87799<br />

CD (P=0.05) - - 0.910 314 0.27 3974<br />

Effect <strong>of</strong> cropping system on soil fertility at harvest<br />

Cropping system OC (%) pH EC (dS/m) N (kg/ha) P (kg/ha) K (kg/ha)<br />

Groundnut-wheat 0.31 7.4 0.14 138.9 10.3 244.8<br />

Sorghum–Chick Pea 0.30 7.6 0.16 135.1 9.6 237.4<br />

571 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Maize-Mustard 0.28 7.6 0.16 128.4 8.9 230.6<br />

CD (P=0.05) NS NS NS 5.71 0.9 11.7<br />

Initial 0.28 7.7 0.16 134.2 8.1 241.2<br />

It was observed that in-situ rain water harvesting was found maximum in ridge and furrow<br />

system and has been found promising in better moisture retention and results in 27% water<br />

saving. The system productivity was registered maximum in Ridge and Furrow planting<br />

system besides generating highest water productivity. Amongst different cropping systems,<br />

Maize-mustard cropping sequence has proved its superiority in terms <strong>of</strong> generating highest<br />

Maize equivalent yield, water productivity and net return although Groundnut-wheat has<br />

recorded maximum WEY and Gross Return. It has also been observed that Maize-mustard<br />

cropping sequence which has observed highest Maize equivalent yield, water productivity<br />

and net return has resulted in decline in soil fertility.<br />

Conclusion<br />

The study recommends practicing ridge and furrow planting especially in Maize and<br />

Sorghum crops to promote better drainage and in-situ rain water harvesting in furrows to<br />

address intermittent drought.<br />

References<br />

Athuman Mahinda, Shinya Funakawa, Hitoshi Shinjo & Method Kilasara. 2018. Interactive<br />

effects <strong>of</strong> in situ rainwater harvesting techniques and fertilizer sources on mitigation <strong>of</strong><br />

soil moisture stress for sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench) in dryland areas <strong>of</strong><br />

Tanzania. Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 64(6) 710–718.<br />

T4a-04O-1151<br />

Gliricidia Green Leaf Manure as a Source <strong>of</strong> Potassium for Improvement<br />

in Soil Quality and Sustaining Rainfed Cotton Productivity in Vertisols <strong>of</strong><br />

Central India<br />

V. V. Gabhane, P. R. Ramteke, R. S. Patode, M. M. Ganvir, A. B. Chorey and<br />

A. R. Tupe<br />

AICRP for Dryland Agriculture, Dr Panjabrao Deshmukh Krishi Vidyapeeth,<br />

Akola-444 104, Maharashtra, India.<br />

Cotton based cropping system is one <strong>of</strong> the most preferred cropping patterns in Vidarbha<br />

region by the farming community to reduce the risk in agriculture. However, due to<br />

imbalanced fertilization and very less use <strong>of</strong> the organic manure, there is a continuous mining<br />

leeching <strong>of</strong> the nutrients especially soil K reserve, which results in deterioration <strong>of</strong> soil<br />

Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture<br />

572 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

health. Most <strong>of</strong> the research work on gliricidia as a green leaf manure is focused on nitrogen<br />

contribution through gliricidia. However, limited studies have been carried out on<br />

contribution <strong>of</strong> potassium through gliricidia. The integrated long-term effect <strong>of</strong> gliricidia<br />

green leaf manuring as a source <strong>of</strong> potassium helps in sustaining crop productivity and soil<br />

health. The resultant outcome <strong>of</strong> the study will help to optimize the crop yields as well as<br />

balanced fertilization, which may help to reduce the cost on fertilizers and make cotton<br />

cultivation sustainable.<br />

Methodology<br />

An experiment with the combinations <strong>of</strong> organic and inorganic nutrient sources was<br />

conducted during 2015-16 to 2020-21 at the research field <strong>of</strong> AICRP for Dryland Agriculture,<br />

Dr. PDKV, Akola, Maharashtra on rainfed cotton in Vertisols. The soil <strong>of</strong> the experimental<br />

site was moderately alkaline in reaction, low in available nitrogen (185.80 kg ha -1 ), medium<br />

in available phosphorus (14.60 kg ha -1 ) and high in available potassium (322.0 kg ha -1 ). Soil<br />

samples were collected at harvest <strong>of</strong> crop and were analyzed as per standard methods.<br />

Results<br />

The pooled results (2015-16 to 2020-21) indicated that the highest seed cotton yield (1282.73<br />

kg ha -1 ) was recorded with the application <strong>of</strong> 100% NP + 10 kg K(inorganic)+20 kg K<br />

through gliricidia (T 4). Similar results were recorded by Satpute et al. (2019). The data<br />

presented in the table indicate that the higher Sustainability yield index (0.36) was recorded<br />

with the application <strong>of</strong> 100% NP + 10kg K(inorganic)+20kg K through gliricidia(T4),<br />

indicating the significant role <strong>of</strong> conjunctive use <strong>of</strong> gliricidia green leaf manure along with<br />

chemical fertilizers in sustaining the cotton productivity.<br />

Effect <strong>of</strong> potash application through gliricidia green leaf manuring on yield, SYI and<br />

economics <strong>of</strong> cotton<br />

Treatment<br />

Seed cotton<br />

yield<br />

(kg ha -1 )<br />

SYI<br />

GMR<br />

(Rs ha -1 )<br />

NMR<br />

(Rs ha -1 )<br />

B:C<br />

Ratio<br />

Control 692.39 0.22 35284 14575 1.70<br />

100% RDF (60:30:30 NPK kg ha -1 ) 1052.47 0.31 53548 26051 1.93<br />

100% NP + 15kg K(inorganic)+ 15kg K through<br />

gliricidia<br />

100% NP + 10kg K(inorganic)+ 20 kg K through<br />

gliricidia<br />

1207.86 0.34 61114 32008 2.08<br />

1282.73 0.36 64948 35265 2.16<br />

100% NP + 30kg K through gliricidia 1117.07 0.32 56692 27453 1.92<br />

75% N +100% P+15kg K(inorganic) + 15kg K<br />

through gliricidia<br />

1036.97 0.29 52223 24093 1.84<br />

75% N +100% P+30kg K through gliricidia 977.68 0.30 49542 21105 1.73<br />

573 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

50% N +100% P+30kg K through gliricidia 902.00 0.27 45700 18550 1.67<br />

100% K through gliricidia 809.37 0.25 41388 17739 1.73<br />

SE (m) ± 30.96 - 1517 1517 -<br />

CD at 5% 87.31 - 4278 4278 -<br />

The pooled data on yield and economics <strong>of</strong> cotton presented in Table indicate that the higher<br />

gross monetary returns, net monetary returns and B:C ratio was obtained with the application<br />

<strong>of</strong> 100% NP + 10 kg K(inorganic)+20 kg K through gliricidia (T 4) indicating the significant<br />

role <strong>of</strong> integrated nutrient management through gliricidia green leaf manuring in enhancing<br />

the economics <strong>of</strong> cotton cultivation. The higher soil organic carbon (0.68%) was recorded<br />

with application <strong>of</strong> 100% NP + 10kg K(inorganic)+20kg K through gliricidia (T 4). The data<br />

on available nutrient status <strong>of</strong> the experimental soil, indicated that significantly higher<br />

available nitrogen (211.2kg ha -1 ), available phosphorus (16.75kg ha -1 ) and available<br />

potassium (361.6kg ha -1 ) was observed with application <strong>of</strong> 100% NP + 10 kg<br />

K(inorganic)+20 kg K through gliricidia(T 4). The increase in available phosphorus status<br />

under INM treatments is due to use <strong>of</strong> gliricidia green leaf manure, being direct source <strong>of</strong><br />

phosphorus and it might have also solubilized the native phosphorus in the soil through<br />

release <strong>of</strong> various organic acids which had chelating effect, that reduced phosphorus fixation,<br />

whereas the increase in available K may be due to the fact that, gliricidia green leaf manure<br />

addition could increase the CEC <strong>of</strong> soil, which is responsible for holding more amount <strong>of</strong><br />

exchangeable K and helped in the release <strong>of</strong> exchangeable K from non-exchangeable pool<br />

just as in case <strong>of</strong> the study <strong>of</strong> Kumar et al., 2008.<br />

Effect potash management through gliricidia green leaf manuring on soil fertility and SQI<br />

Treatments<br />

OC<br />

(%)<br />

Avail. Nutrients<br />

(kg ha -1 )<br />

N P K<br />

Control 0.50 181.9 12.75 317.8 2.66<br />

100% RDF (60:30:30 NPK kg ha -1 ) 0.59 198.6 15.05 334.9 2.95<br />

100% NP + 15kg K(inorganic)+15kg K through gliricidia 0.65 209.1 16.51 352.2 3.41<br />

100% NP + 10kg K(inorganic)+20kg K through gliricidia 0.68 211.2 16.75 361.6 3.52<br />

100% NP + 30kg K through gliricidia 0.64 204.9 15.54 353.4 3.37<br />

75% N +100% P+15kg K(inorganic)+15kg K through gliricidia 0.60 196.5 15.18 338.9 3.18<br />

75% N +100% P+30kg K through gliricidia 0.59 198.6 15.12 332.1 3.15<br />

50% N +100% P+30kg K through gliricidia 0.58 192.3 14.81 326.9 3.01<br />

100% K through gliricidia 0.56 190.2 14.08 324.4 2.95<br />

SE (m) ± 0.01 4.02 0.21 6.75 -<br />

CD at 5% 0.04 12.05 0.64 20.2 -<br />

Initial value (2015-16) 0.51 185.8 14.6 322.0 -<br />

SQI<br />

Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture<br />

574 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

The data in respect <strong>of</strong> various potassium fractions in soil indicate that the significantly higher<br />

values <strong>of</strong> water-soluble K, exchangeable K, non-exchangeable K, total K and lattice K was<br />

recorded with the application <strong>of</strong> 100% NP + 10kg K(inorganic)+20kg K through gliricidia<br />

(T4).<br />

Soil quality<br />

The data presented in Table indicate that the higher soil quality index (3.52) was recorded<br />

with the application <strong>of</strong> 100% NP + 10kg K(inorganic)+20kg K through gliricidia(T4).<br />

Conclusion<br />

For sustaining soil fertility, cotton productivity and obtaining higher monetary returns,<br />

application <strong>of</strong> 50% recommended N (30 kg) + 30 kg P2O5 + 10 kg K2O ha -1 through<br />

inorganics and 20 kg K 2O ha -1 through gliricidia green leaf manuring (4 t ha -1 ) at 30 DAS is<br />

recommended as an Integrated Plant Nutrient Supply System under dryland condition.<br />

References<br />

Kumar Balwindar, Gupta, R. K., and Bhandari, A. L. 2008. Soil fertility changes after longterm<br />

application <strong>of</strong> organic manures and crop residues under rice-wheat system. J.<br />

Indian Soc. Soil Sci. 56(1): 80-85.<br />

Satpute Usha, V., Gabhane, V. V., Jawale, S. A., and Nagdeve, M. B. 2019.Effect <strong>of</strong> potash<br />

management through conjoint use <strong>of</strong> Gliricidia green leaf manure and mineral fertilizer<br />

on yield and nutrient uptake by rainfed cotton in Vertisols. Int. J. Chem. Stud. 7(3):<br />

4564-4567.<br />

T4a-05R-1244<br />

Conjunctive use <strong>of</strong> Zeolite and Urea to Minimize Nitrogen Loss and<br />

Enhance Nutrient Availability and Maize Productivity in Alfisols<br />

V. Girijaveni 1 , K. Sammi Reddy 1 , J. V. N. S. Prasad 1 , Ch. Srinivasarao 2 , Sumanta<br />

Kundu 1 , Pushpanajali 1 and K. Srinivas 1<br />

1 Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, Hyderabad 500 059, India<br />

2 National Academy <strong>of</strong> Agricultural Research Management, Hyderabad – 500030, India<br />

Natural zeolites consist <strong>of</strong> three-dimensional framework <strong>of</strong> silica and aluminum tetrahedra<br />

and are hydrated aluminosilicates with honeycomb structure, which is generally very open,<br />

containing channels and cavities. These channels and cavities are filled with cations and<br />

water molecules (Karapinar, 2009). Zeolite is a group <strong>of</strong> natural minerals with physical and<br />

physicochemical properties that can be utilized in various areas such as construction and<br />

agriculture. Research revealed that these naturally occurring zeolites are capable <strong>of</strong> absorbing<br />

575 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

part <strong>of</strong> the excess nutrients and also water, resulting in more balanced macronutrient cation<br />

ratios in the root environment and thus able to enhance water and nutrient use efficiency.<br />

Zeolite possess unique characteristics <strong>of</strong> high cation exchange capacity, large internal<br />

porosity, uniform particle size distribution, and reduces the effect <strong>of</strong> stress on the crop<br />

(Hazrati et al., 2017). Its application improved soil nutrients and soil water content in various<br />

soil types and various crops, i.e. rice, Aloe vera, amaranth, sunflower and dragonhead<br />

(Hazrati et al., 2017; Karimzadeh Asl and Hatami, 2019; Karami et al., 2019). Thus, zeolite<br />

application leads to soil improvement. However, very little literature is available regarding<br />

zeolite performance in divergent crop and soil types in India. Thus, this study was taken up to<br />

study the impact <strong>of</strong> zeolite application on soil nutrient, water and crop performance in rainfed<br />

Alfisols.<br />

Methodology<br />

Pot experiment was carried at CRIDA, Hyderabad with maize as test crop with different<br />

levels <strong>of</strong> zeolite (0, 50,100 & 200 kg ha -1 ) in combination with different fertilizer dose<br />

(control, 50% RDF & 100% RDF) at two different moisture levels (50% and 100% Field<br />

capacity). The experimental design was completely randomized block design with three<br />

replications. The soil used in the study was collected from Hayathnagar Research Farm<br />

(HRF), CRIDA, Hyderabad. The maize hybrid studied was DHM-117. The soils collected<br />

were sieved through 2 mm sieve and was mixed with zeolite and fertilizers as per the<br />

treatments and after mixing <strong>of</strong> zeolite, the pot is filled with soil @ 10 kg pot -1 . At the end <strong>of</strong><br />

the maturity stage, cob from each plant from pot was harvested. Grains were separated from<br />

the cobs and grain yield was calculated. The post-harvest soil samples were also collected<br />

and analyzed for SOC, and available macro (N, P, K) and micro nutrients (Zn, Fe, Mn and<br />

Cu) as per standard procedure. Also, details <strong>of</strong> water added to the crop was collected to<br />

calculate the water use efficiency (WUE).<br />

Results<br />

The two most important factors that affects the maize production is nitrogen and moisture<br />

content. The grain yield <strong>of</strong> maize ranged from 17.99 to 52.15 g pot -1 . The grain yield <strong>of</strong><br />

maize was significantly improved by application <strong>of</strong> different combinations <strong>of</strong> recommended<br />

dose <strong>of</strong> fertilizers and zeolite levels. The lowest grain yield was observed in control (17.99 g<br />

pot -1 ). Increasing the zeolite dose have significantly improved N uptake from 169.39 mg pot -1<br />

to 261.43 mg pot -1 and nitrogen levels also significantly improved N uptake. Similarly,<br />

zeolite application has significantly improved K uptake from 198.75 mg pot -1 to 299.14 mg<br />

pot -1 . Also, zeolite addition improved soil available N by 20.3% and 27% at 50% and 100%<br />

Field capacity respectively and soil available K by 27% and 34.4% under 50% and 100%<br />

Field capacity, respectively.<br />

Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture<br />

576 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Conclusion<br />

The results from this preliminary research showed that zeolite application along with<br />

fertilizers improved crop production and soil chemical properties. There was significant<br />

difference in N and K uptake with higher dose <strong>of</strong> zeolite application (100 & 200 kg ha -1 ) as<br />

compared to control at both the moisture levels. However, further investigations need to be<br />

carried to study the effect <strong>of</strong> zeolite application in different soil types at field conditions.<br />

References<br />

Hazrati, S., Tahmasebi-Sarvestani, Z., Mokhtassi-Bidgoli, A., Modarres-Sanavy, S. A. M.,<br />

Mohammadi, H. and Nicola, S. 2017. Effects <strong>of</strong> zeolite and water stress on growth,<br />

yield and chemical compositions <strong>of</strong> Aloe vera L. Agric. Water Manag. 181:66-72.<br />

Karimzadeh Asl, K. and Hatami, M. 2019. Application <strong>of</strong> zeolite and bacterial fertilizers<br />

modulates physiological performance and essential oil production in dragonhead under<br />

different irrigation regimes. Acta Physiol. Plant. 41(1):1-20.<br />

Karami, S., Hadi, H., Tajbaksh, M. and Modarres-Sanavy, S. A. M. 2020. Effect <strong>of</strong> zeolite on<br />

nitrogen use efficiency and physiological and biomass traits <strong>of</strong> amaranth (Amaranthus<br />

hypochondriacus) under water-deficit stress conditions. J. Soil Sci. 20(3):1427-1441.<br />

T4a-06R-1227<br />

Effect <strong>of</strong> Conservation Agriculture and balanced nutrition on System<br />

Productivity, Pr<strong>of</strong>itability and Mitigating GHGs Emission in Maize-<br />

Horsegram Sequence in Rainfed Alfisols<br />

Sumanta Kundu 1* , Ch. Srinivasarao 1 , R. B. Mallick 2 , K. Sammi Reddy 1 , V. K. Singh 1 , J.<br />

V. N. S. Prasad 1 , A. K. Indoria 1 , G. Pratibha 1 , V. Girija Veni 1 , Pravin B. Thakur 1 , T.<br />

Satyanarayana 3 , Kaushik Majumdar 3 and B. Venkateshwarlu 1<br />

1 ICAR-Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, Santoshnagar, Hyderabad, 500 059, India<br />

2 Institute <strong>of</strong> Agricultural Sciences, Calcutta University, West Bengal, India<br />

3 International Plant Nutrition Institute, Gurgaon, India<br />

* Sumanta.K@icar.gov.in<br />

Land degradation, low soil fertility, erratic rainfall are the prime constraints for low<br />

agricultural production in the semi-arid region. In Alfisols regions <strong>of</strong> southern India, most <strong>of</strong><br />

the cultivated areas produce a single crop in rainy (Kharif) season and 25-30% rainfall goes<br />

unutilized in post rainy (Rabi) season which remains fallow. In these areas, drought hardy<br />

crop like horsegram can be cultivated in sequence <strong>of</strong> Kharif crop by practicing effective soil<br />

moisture conservation measures or conservation agriculture (CA). CA can play a major role<br />

in stabilizing production in rainfed regions by mitigating water and nutrient stress through<br />

577 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

adoption <strong>of</strong> reduced tillage, crop rotations and residue retention. Several successful case<br />

studies on CA were reported in irrigated systems (Aulakh et al., 2012), but very limited<br />

efforts were made in rainfed production systems. In this background, an attempt was made to<br />

find out the impact <strong>of</strong> CA on system productivity, pr<strong>of</strong>itability, nutrient use efficiency and<br />

GHGs emission in maize-horsegram cropping sequence in rainfed Alfisol.<br />

Methodology<br />

A field experiment was conducted during 2010-2020 at Gunegal Research Farm <strong>of</strong> Central<br />

Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture (CRIDA), Hyderabad. These sandy loam soils are<br />

slightly acidic in reaction, low in soil organic carbon, medium available nutrients (N, P and<br />

K). Among micronutrient Zn was deficient (0.48 mg kg -1 ). Experiment was laid out in split<br />

plot design consisting 2 tillage treatments (conservation= zero tillage and residue retention<br />

(CA) and conventional= 2 ploughing, complete removal <strong>of</strong> residues (CT)) as main plot and<br />

nutrient management (control, NPKSZnB (120-60-40-55-10-0.5 kg N, P 2O 5, K 2O, S, Zn, B<br />

respectively), N, P, K, S, Zn, B omission) as sub plot. Each treatment was replicated thrice.<br />

Chemical fertilizers as N, P, K, S, Zn and B were applied in the form <strong>of</strong> urea (46% N),<br />

diammonium phosphate (DAP) (18% N and 46% P 2O 5), muriate <strong>of</strong> potash (MOP) (60%<br />

K2O), single super phosphate (SSP), Zinc sulfate (21% Zn) and Borax respectively. Hybrid<br />

maize (DHM 117) was grown in rainy season (June-October) following 60x25 cm spacing<br />

and horsegram (CRIDA 18R) was sown just after the harvesting <strong>of</strong> maize.<br />

Results<br />

Pooled data showed that system productivity increased through CA in maize-horsegram<br />

sequence through successful raising <strong>of</strong> Rabi season horsegram crop utilizing <strong>of</strong>f season<br />

rainfall through better soil moisture conservation. Out <strong>of</strong> 11 years (2010-2020), 8 years total<br />

system yield in CA was higher than or at par with CT and in 7 years horsegram crop was<br />

successful. Agronomic efficiency (AE) <strong>of</strong> N, P, K in CA was 22.1, 55.3 and 26.6 kg yield<br />

increase per kg <strong>of</strong> fertilizer nutrients applied compared to 18.8, 40.7, 24.1 kg yield increase<br />

per kg <strong>of</strong> fertilizer nutrients applied respectively in CT due better soil water nutrient<br />

interaction (Aulakh et al.,2012). Higher grain yield <strong>of</strong> horsegram in CA was due to 4.2%<br />

higher soil moisture compared to CT during flowering and grain filling stage <strong>of</strong> horsegram<br />

which helped better grain filling <strong>of</strong> horsegram (Kundu et al., 2013). Significantly higher<br />

gross return (Rs. 37308 ha -1 ), net return (Rs. 20951 ha -1 ) and B:C ratio (2.25) was found in<br />

CA compared to CT. Significantly higher available N (207 kg ha -1 ) and K (180 kg ha -1 ) was<br />

observed in balanced fertilization and N omission treatment respectively. Significantly higher<br />

buildup <strong>of</strong> available K (32 kg ha -1 ) and soil organic carbon sequestration (13.6 Mg ha -1 ) was<br />

observed in CA. Higher SOC was observed in CA (0.64%) compared to CT (0.48%). SOC<br />

decreased with depth irrespective <strong>of</strong> tillage systems. There was no significant difference in<br />

SOC beyond 30 cm soil depth. Higher very labile C was observed in CT (0.38%) compared<br />

Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture<br />

578 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

to CA, but higher labile and less labile C was observed in CA compared to CT. Significantly<br />

higher MBC (104 and 91 µg g -1 <strong>of</strong> soil after harvest <strong>of</strong> maize and horsegram respectively),<br />

urease (100 µg NH4 g -1 hr -1 after harvest <strong>of</strong> horsegram), aryl sulfatase, alkaline phosphatase<br />

activity was observed in CA compared to CT. Water soluble K was higher in CA (6.2 mg/kg)<br />

compared to CT in 0-15 and 15-30 cm soil depth. Higher Fe (16.9 mg/kg) and Cu (1.08<br />

mg/kg) was observed in CA compared to CT but Mn content was at par. Significantly higher<br />

CO 2 emission (kg ha -1 ) was observed in CA (5069) as compared to CT (4060) during maize<br />

growing season. Among nutrient management, higher CO 2 emission (kg ha -1 ) was observed<br />

in NPKSZnB (7510) followed by N omission (3258) and control (2927). Significantly higher<br />

N 2O omission (g ha -1 ) was observed in CT (243.7) compared to CA (188.9). CA increased<br />

CO2 emission by 24.8%, but decreased N2O emission by 29% compared to CT which<br />

ultimately resulted lower global warming potential (GWP).<br />

Total system yield (Mg/ha)<br />

12.0<br />

10.0<br />

8.0<br />

6.0<br />

4.0<br />

2.0<br />

0.0<br />

Conclusion<br />

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020<br />

System productivity (Mg ha -1 ) as inflenced by CA.<br />

CA<br />

CT<br />

System productivity increased through CA in maize-horsegram sequence. Effect <strong>of</strong> CA is<br />

more pronounced in sequence crop (horsegram) grown in rabi season. In less rainfall year, it<br />

can minimize the effect <strong>of</strong> moisture stress <strong>of</strong> hosegram and sustain the crop for several more<br />

weeks. CA improved the SOC and available nutrient status, particularly K in the soil. Thus,<br />

CA with improved nutrient management can improve soil health, nutrient use efficiency and<br />

increase net primary productivity and pr<strong>of</strong>itability in rainfed region.<br />

References<br />

Aulakh, M. S., Manchanda, J. S., Garg, A. K., Kumar, S., Dercon, G., Nguyen, M. L., 2012. Crop<br />

production and nutrient use efficiency <strong>of</strong> conservation agriculture for soybean–wheat rotation<br />

in the Indo-Gangetic Plains <strong>of</strong> Northwestern India. Soil Tillage Res. 120: 50–60.<br />

Kundu, S., Srinivasarao, Ch., Mallick, R. B., Satyanarayana, T., Prakash Naik, R., Johnston, A. and<br />

Venkateswarlu, B. 2013. Conservation agriculture in maize (Zea mays L.)-horsegram<br />

(Macrotyloma uniflorum L.) system in rainfed Alfisols for carbon sequestration and climate<br />

change mitigation. J. Agric. Meteorol. 15:144-149.<br />

579 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

T4a-07R-1015<br />

Effect <strong>of</strong> Conservation Agriculture and Mineral Nitrogen Levels on Soil<br />

Aggregate Stability Indices and Associated Carbon in Rainfed Maize (Zea<br />

mays L.) - Pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.) Crop Rotation under<br />

Alfisols<br />

A. K. Indoria 1* , K. Sammi Reddy 1 , G. Pratibha 1 , V. K. Singh 1 , D. S. Kumar 2 , S. Kundu 1 ,<br />

S. S. Balloli 1 , K. Srinivas 1 , K. L. Sharma 1 , M. Prabhakar 1 , Ch. Srinivasarao 3 , V. Visha<br />

Kumari 1 , S. Sukumaran 1 , V. N. Mishra 2 and H. Sahu 1<br />

1 ICAR-Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, Hyderabad, India<br />

2 Indira Gandhi Krishi Vishwavidyalaya, Raipur, India<br />

3 ICAR- National Academy <strong>of</strong> Agricultural Research Management, Hyderabad, India<br />

* ashok.indoria@icar.gov.in<br />

Intensive tillage directly affects the stability and formation <strong>of</strong> soil aggregates by disrupting<br />

soil structure. Its intensity deteriorates and weakens soil aggregates, making them susceptible<br />

to decay. Conservation agriculture as a soil management technology has been suggested by<br />

many researchers to minimise the negative impact <strong>of</strong> conventional tillage practices on soil<br />

aggregate functioning (Indoria et. al., 2017). Soil aggregates are considered as the pockets to<br />

provide physical protection to soil carbon and significantly affect the diffusion rate <strong>of</strong><br />

oxygen, nutrient adsorption, soil water retention, microbial community and root growth<br />

(Indoria et. al., 2017). This study was aimed to assess the impact <strong>of</strong> conservation agriculture<br />

practices and different levels <strong>of</strong> mineral N on soil aggregate stability indices and associated<br />

carbon in maize-pigeonpea crop rotation under Alfisols.<br />

Methodology<br />

A long-term field experiment was established at Gunegal Research Farm <strong>of</strong> ICAR-CRIDA,<br />

Hyderabad in 2012. Treatments includes three tillage practices viz., CT (conventional<br />

tillage), RT (reduced tillage) and NT (no-tillage), and four nitrogen levels viz., N-0= no<br />

nitrogen application (control). N-75= 75% <strong>of</strong> RDN (recommended dose <strong>of</strong> nitrogen), N-<br />

100=100% <strong>of</strong> RDN and N-125=125% <strong>of</strong> RDN <strong>of</strong> maize and pigeonpea crops on yearly<br />

rotation basis. Soil samples were collected during 2018 (after seven years) from 0-7.5, 7.5-15<br />

and 15-30 cm soil depths. The aggregate size distribution <strong>of</strong> soil was determined by wet<br />

sieving method using Yoder type apparatus. The C associated with different aggregate size<br />

fractions was determined by using the CHNS Analyzer, Vario EL.<br />

Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture<br />

580 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Results<br />

Tillage practices and mineral nitrogen levels significantly influenced the aggregate stability<br />

indices. Significantly higher mean weight diameter (MWD) <strong>of</strong> soil aggregates recorded in the<br />

NT (35%) and RT (25%) as compared to the CT in 0-7.5 cm soil depth. Similarly,<br />

significantly higher MWD were recorded under N-125 as compared to the other N levels (Fig<br />

1 A). A similar trend was observed in 7.5-15 and 15-30 cm soil depth with respect to the<br />

MWD. About 70% higher aggregate ratio (AR) was observed in NT, and about 33% higher<br />

AR was observed under RT as compared to the CT. Similarly, nitrogen treatment follows the<br />

order: N-0< N-750.5-0.25>0.25-0.106>1-0.5>2-1>4.75-2<br />

mm>silt+clay at all the soil depths, irrespective <strong>of</strong> tillage and nitrogen levels. The order <strong>of</strong><br />

aggregate and silt+clay associated C content follows: NT>RT>CT, while in case <strong>of</strong> N levels,<br />

it follows: N-125 >N-100>N-75>N-0. In NT and RT, the C stocks in different macroaggregates<br />

(4.75-2, 2-1, 1-0.5 and 0.5-0.25 mm) increased, while these decreased in microaggregates<br />

(0.25-0.106 and 0.106-0.053 mm).<br />

Effect <strong>of</strong> different tillage practices and mineral nitrogen levels on A) MWD (mm) and water stable<br />

aggregates (%) in 0-7.5 cm soil depth.<br />

581 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

The total residues turn-out had significant (p ≤ 0.05) and positive correlation with MWD,<br />

WSA, WSMacA, AR, WSMacA-C, WSMicA-C, silt+clay-C and WSMacA C stock, and was<br />

significantly (p ≤ 0.05) and negatively correlated with WSMicA, WSMicA Cstock and<br />

silt+clay Cstock at 0-7.5, 7.515 and 15-30 cm soil depth. These results were conformity with<br />

the earlier findings by Zeng et al., 2021.<br />

Conclusion<br />

The present study indicates that full conservation agriculture (NT) or partial conservation<br />

agriculture (RT) coupled with adequate application <strong>of</strong> mineral N help in creating the<br />

optimum environment in soil for overall improvement <strong>of</strong> the aggregate indices and enhancing<br />

the aggregate C stocks.<br />

References<br />

Indoria, A.K., Srinivasarao, Ch., Sharma, K.L., and Sammi Reddy, K. 2017. Conservation<br />

agriculture–a panacea to improve soil physical health. Curr. Sci. 112, 52-61.<br />

Zeng, R. Wei, Y., Huang, J., Chen, X. and Cai, C. 2021. Soil organic carbon stock and<br />

fractional distribution across central south China. Int. Soil Water Conserv. Res. 9,<br />

620-630.<br />

T4a-08R- 1187<br />

Growth and Yield <strong>of</strong> Groundnut as influenced by Moisture Stress at<br />

different Phenophases<br />

C. Radha Kumari, B. Sahadeva Reddy, D. V. Srinivasulu, K. C. Nataraj and<br />

Ch. Murali Krishna<br />

Agricultural Research Station, Acharya N. G. Ranga Agricultural University, Ananthapuram -515 001<br />

Anantapuram has the largest groundnut area among different districts <strong>of</strong> Andhra Pradesh.<br />

It is 2 nd driest district in the country after Jaisalmer in Rajasthan with lowest recorded<br />

rainfall 553 mm. Besides low rainfall, the variability in rainfall distribution is also very<br />

high in the district. Some <strong>of</strong> the previous studies have shown that the pod yield <strong>of</strong><br />

groundnut had a curvilinear relationship with rainfall and soil moisture ( Vittal et al.,<br />

2003). In rainfed agriculture, a need is <strong>of</strong>ten felt to identify suitable drought resistant<br />

varieties <strong>of</strong> crops which have a better performance under varying soil and agro-climatic<br />

conditions. Accordingly, the present study was conducted with the objective <strong>of</strong> assessing<br />

the impact <strong>of</strong> dry spells at different growth stages on groundnut productivity and<br />

identifying a suitable drought resistant variety for attaining maximum productivity in an<br />

arid alfisol.<br />

Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture<br />

582 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Methodology<br />

A field experiment was conducted to study growth and yield <strong>of</strong> groundnut as influenced by<br />

moisture stress imposed at different growth stages <strong>of</strong> groundnut using rainout shelters under<br />

rainfed conditions during Kharif, 2015-16 at Agricultural Research Station, Ananthapuram <strong>of</strong><br />

Andhra Pradesh. This experiment was non replicated laid out in split plot design. The main<br />

plots consisted <strong>of</strong> four treatments viz., M1: Imposing moisture stress during 30-50 DAS<br />

(flowering to pegging), M 2: Imposing moisture stress during 50-70 DAS (pegging to pod<br />

formation), M 3: Imposing moisture stress during 70-90 DAS (pod filling to maturation) and<br />

M4: Moisture stress free condition and sub plots comprised <strong>of</strong> 5 varieties viz., K-6, K-9,<br />

Anantha, Dharani and Harithandhra. Sowing <strong>of</strong> different varieties was taken up as per the<br />

treatments M1, M2 and M3 treatments were imposed by withholding rainfall using rainout<br />

shelters during 30-50 (flowering to pegging), 50-70 (pegging to pod formation), and 70-90<br />

DAS (pod filling to maturation) respectively followed by regular irrigation. In M 4 treatment<br />

moisture stress free condition was maintained by providing irrigation for entire crop growth<br />

period through sprinkler irrigation system. Leaf, stem, root dry weight per plant at 40 and 80<br />

DAS, and pod yield was measured. A two-way ANOVA is used by considering periods<br />

(days) as a related factor, moisture stress levels and varieties as independent factors followed<br />

by DMRT to identify homogeneous subsets among moisture stress levels and varieties with<br />

respect to pod yield.<br />

Results<br />

The results indicated that dry matter partitioning is changing significantly at different stages<br />

<strong>of</strong> crop growth as presented in the table below. Further, an interaction effect <strong>of</strong> different<br />

stages (DAS) and moisture stress levels is also influencing the dry matter partitioning in<br />

stem which significantly varied with four moisture stress levels. Similarly, dry matter<br />

partitioning is significantly different among five varieties at 40 and 80 DAS which supports<br />

an interaction effect <strong>of</strong> moisture stress and at different stages. Further it is also noticed that<br />

dry matter partitioning in stem is significantly different among four moisture stress levels at<br />

5% level in which ‘moisture stress free’ is deviating significantly from other three levels<br />

with the highest partitioning value i.e 2.438 irrespective <strong>of</strong> DAS and varieties (DMRT).<br />

Whereas treatments influence the dry matter partitioning in stem significantly in which<br />

Dharani and K9 varieties are showing high value <strong>of</strong> partitioning than that <strong>of</strong> other three<br />

varieties (DMRT).<br />

Moisture stress during 70-90DAS (pod filling to maturity) recorded highest pod yield<br />

reduction followed by Moisture stress during 50-70DAS (pegging to pod formation) and 30-<br />

50DAS (flowering to pegging) compared to stress free condition. It indicates that pod filling<br />

to maturity stage is most critical stage in groundnut. Among varieties K6, Harithandra and<br />

Ananta recorded pod yield reduction <strong>of</strong> 54%, 53.7% and 49.3% respectively. K9 and<br />

583 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Dharani recorded 39 and 39.7% pod yield reduction. It indicates that K9 and Dharani are<br />

drought resistant varieties. Ramachandrappa et al. (1992) reported that the groundnut crop<br />

was more susceptible to moisture stress from70 days to harvest (pod initiation to maturity).<br />

Golakiya and Patel (1992) reported that water stress at flowering, pegging, pod development<br />

and pod maturation stages reduced the pod yields <strong>of</strong> groundnut by 26.6, 44.7, 56.3 and 60<br />

percent respectively.<br />

Conclusion<br />

The findings <strong>of</strong> the present study indicated that pod filling to maturity stage is most critical<br />

stage in groundnut with highest pod yield reduction. Among the varieties, K9 and Dharani<br />

are more drought resistant than K6, Ananta and Harithandra varieties.<br />

References<br />

Golakiya, B. A., and Patel, M. S., 1992. Growth dynamics and reproductive efficiency <strong>of</strong><br />

groundnut under water stress at different phenophases. Indian J. Agron. 26: 179-186.<br />

Ramachandrappa, B. K., Kulakarni, K. R., and Nanjappa, H. V. 1992. Stress day index for<br />

scheduling irrigation in summer groundnut (Arachis hypogaeaL.). Indian J. Agron. 37:<br />

276-279.<br />

Vittal, K. P. R., Maruthi Sankar, G. R., Singh, H. P., Balaguravaiah, D., Padmalatha, Y. and<br />

Moisture<br />

stress<br />

Moisture<br />

Stress<br />

during<br />

30-50<br />

DAS<br />

Moisture<br />

Stress<br />

during<br />

50-70<br />

Yellamanda Reddy, T. 2003. Modeling sustainablility <strong>of</strong> crop yield on rainfed<br />

groundnut based on rainfall and land degradation. Indian J. Dryland Agric. Res. Dev.<br />

18(1) : 7–13.<br />

Dry matter partitioning (g) per plant and pod yield <strong>of</strong> groundnut as influenced by<br />

moisture stress imposed during different stages<br />

Mean<br />

Variety<br />

Leaf dry<br />

weight per<br />

plant (g)<br />

40<br />

DAS<br />

80<br />

DAS<br />

Stem dry<br />

weight per<br />

plant (g)<br />

40<br />

DAS<br />

80<br />

DAS<br />

Root dry<br />

weight per<br />

plant (g)<br />

40<br />

DAS<br />

80<br />

DAS<br />

Leaf area<br />

index (LAI)<br />

40<br />

DAS<br />

80<br />

DAS<br />

Pod<br />

yield<br />

(kg/ha)<br />

%<br />

Decrease<br />

<strong>of</strong> pod<br />

yield over<br />

control<br />

K6 0.68 3.21 0.72 2.75 0.23 0.56 0.65 1.33 1638 -32.0<br />

K9 0.82 4.31 0.96 3.15 0.18 0.61 0.80 1.69 1733 -17.0<br />

Anantha 0.89 3.98 0.76 2.70 0.15 0.63 0.75 1.54 1614 -28.0<br />

Dharani 0.96 4.33 0.82 3.83 0.10 0.59 0.94 1.77 1842 -16.0<br />

Harithandra 0.71 2.67 0.67 2.51 0.08 0.42 0.68 1.16 1547 -27.0<br />

Mean 0.81 3.70 0.79 2.99 0.15 0.56 0.76 1.50 1674 -24.0<br />

K6 0.76 3.92 0.85 2.84 0.16 0.62 0.76 1.46 1374 -43.0<br />

K9 0.82 4.33 1.16 3.48 0.09 0.84 0.66 1.88 1671 -20.0<br />

Ananta 0.83 4.32 0.95 3.14 0.14 0.56 0.69 1.56 1271 -43.0<br />

Dharani 1.05 3.97 0.81 2.89 0.16 0.78 0.97 1.76 1694 -22.0<br />

Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture<br />

584 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

DAS Harithandra 0.72 3.13 0.95 2.03 0.11 0.58 0.71 1.34 1123 -47.0<br />

Moisture<br />

Stress<br />

during<br />

70-90<br />

DAS<br />

Moisture<br />

stress<br />

free<br />

Total<br />

Mean 0.84 3.93 0.94 2.88 0.13 0.68 0.76 1.60 1426 -35.0<br />

K6 0.96 2.60 0.99 2.47 0.21 0.52 0.71 1.25 314 -87.0<br />

K9 0.59 3.33 0.86 2.88 0.14 0.50 0.50 1.30 412 -80.0<br />

Ananta 0.85 3.95 0.69 2.88 0.14 0.47 0.62 1.45 509 -77.0<br />

Dharani 0.65 3.02 0.88 2.58 0.14 0.62 0.54 1.31 409 -81.0<br />

Harithandra 0.76 2.69 0.67 1.96 0.08 0.76 0.62 1.10 276 -87.0<br />

Mean 0.76 3.12 0.82 2.55 0.14 0.57 0.60 1.28 384 -82.4<br />

K6 0.82 2.84 0.66 2.91 0.08 0.27 0.87 2.35 2409<br />

K9 0.68 5.69 1.13 5.65 0.16 0.89 0.86 2.18 2085<br />

Ananta 0.98 5.29 1.05 4.33 0.23 0.97 0.82 2.31 2237<br />

Dharani 0.64 2.57 0.73 2.25 0.18 0.48 0.79 2.06 2180<br />

Harithandra 0.76 3.24 0.65 3.67 0.13 0.39 0.86 2.08 2110<br />

Mean 0.78 3.93 0.84 3.76 0.16 0.60 0.84 2.20 2204<br />

K6 0.81 3.14 0.81 2.74 0.17 0.49 0.75 1.60 1433 -54.0<br />

K9 0.73 4.42 1.03 3.79 0.14 0.71 0.71 1.76 1475 -39.0<br />

Ananta 0.89 4.39 0.86 3.26 0.17 0.66 0.72 1.72 1407 -49.3<br />

Dharani 0.83 3.47 0.81 2.89 0.15 0.62 0.81 1.73 1531 -39.7<br />

Harithandra 0.74 2.93 0.74 2.54 0.10 0.54 0.72 1.42 1264 -53.7<br />

DAS **DAS vs moisture stress levels**,<br />

DAS vs Varieties*, varieties* and stress levels*<br />

*significant @ 5% level, ** significant at 1% level, NS Not significant, same alphabet<br />

indicates insignificant difference (DMRT)<br />

T4a-09R-1443<br />

Impact <strong>of</strong> Zero Tillage over Conventional Tillage in Kushinagar District<br />

<strong>of</strong> Uttar Pradesh<br />

Ashok Rai 1 , Neeraj Singh 2 , Vinay Kr. Patel 1 , Vishal Singh 1 and Shamsher Singh 1<br />

1<br />

Krishi Vigyan kendra (ICAR-IIVR) Sargatia Seorahi, Kushinagar (U.P.) -274406<br />

2<br />

ICAR-IIVR Varanasi (U.P.)<br />

An experiment conducted at Amawakhas Nyaypanchayat, Kushinagar district <strong>of</strong> U.P. Under<br />

National Innovation in Climate Resilient Agriculture (NICRA) project for the scrutiny <strong>of</strong> the<br />

impact <strong>of</strong> zero tillage over conventional tillage during the year 2012 to 2016. Zero tillage<br />

reduces cost <strong>of</strong> tillage and irrigation, which results in increase <strong>of</strong> yield through possible<br />

improvement in sowing time and enhanced water use efficiencies. The experiment results<br />

revealed that performance <strong>of</strong> zero tillage was found superior over conventional tillage in<br />

context <strong>of</strong> yield attributes viz. spike length, no. <strong>of</strong> spike m -2 , no. <strong>of</strong> grain spike -1 except test<br />

weight. Therefore, the mean yield was estimated higher in zero tillage i,e 40.55 qha -1 which<br />

was 8.22 % higher than conventional tillage i.e 3722 kg ha -1 . On average zero tillage saved<br />

585 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

total cost <strong>of</strong> cultivation <strong>of</strong> Rs 7265.69 ha -1 and increased the pr<strong>of</strong>it by 13171.07 ha -1 . Zero<br />

tillage method also recorded higher bbenefit cost ratio was 2.34 as compared to conventional<br />

tillage method i.e. 1.70.<br />

Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture<br />

T4a-10R-1235<br />

Nutrient Dynamics in Conservation Agriculture under Rainfed Conditions<br />

P. S. Prabhamani, H. B. Babalad, R. K. Patil and Geetha Shirnalli<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad, Karnataka, India – 580 005<br />

Wide spread degradation <strong>of</strong> natural resources in rainfed areas and climate change are<br />

threatening the national food security. This has brought about focus on rainfed ecology which<br />

has been now affected has very low level <strong>of</strong> sustainability. In rainfed regions, Conservation<br />

agriculture (CA) has been proposed as a widely adapted set <strong>of</strong> management principles that<br />

can assure more sustainable agricultural production. Agro-ecology specific conservation<br />

agriculture strategies are needed in rainfed production systems that have the scope in saving<br />

time, reduced cost <strong>of</strong> production and increase soil carbon sequestration and nutrient<br />

stratification. Conservation tillage is a widely-used terminology in CA to denote soil<br />

management systems that result in at least 30 per cent <strong>of</strong> the soil surface being covered with<br />

crop residues after seeding <strong>of</strong> the subsequent crop. This helps to improve the soil organic<br />

carbon (SOC), physical, chemical and biological properties. Tillage, residue management and<br />

crop rotation have a significant impact on nutrient distribution and transformation in soil<br />

(Sharma et al., 2021). The experiment was conducted with objective to study the effect <strong>of</strong><br />

conservation tillage practices on soil physical properties and nutrient dynamics in groundnutsorghum<br />

cropping system under rainfed conditions.<br />

Methodology<br />

A field experiment was initiated on a fixed site during 2013-14 at Main Agricultural Research<br />

Station, University <strong>of</strong> Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad and after four years <strong>of</strong> experimentation<br />

the results were discussed in this article. The experiment was laid out in strip block design<br />

with six different tillage practices in three replications [CT1: No tillage with BBF (broad bed<br />

and furrows) and crop residues retained on the surface, CT 2: Reduced tillage with BBF and<br />

partial incorporation <strong>of</strong> crop residues, CT 3: No tillage with flat bed (FB) and crop residues<br />

retained on the surface, CT4: Reduced tillage with FB and partial incorporation <strong>of</strong> crop<br />

residues, CT 5: Conventional tillage with crop residues incorporation and CT 6: Conventional<br />

tillage with no application <strong>of</strong> crop residues as control]. Rotavator was passed for shredding<br />

and partial incorporation <strong>of</strong> residue treatment plots and to shred the residues and retention on<br />

the surface rotaslasher was passed, in conventional tillage with crop residue incorporation<br />

plot residues were incorporated at the time <strong>of</strong> ploughing where as in no residue plots all the<br />

crop residues were removed after the harvesting and land was ploughed.<br />

586 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Results<br />

The results <strong>of</strong> effect <strong>of</strong> different conservation tillage systems on soil physical and chemical<br />

properties are presented in the table 1. All conservation tillage systems recorded significantly<br />

higher water stable aggregates content over conventional tillage practices. Among the<br />

conservation tillage practices CT 1 and CT 3 revealed higher aggregate stability followed by<br />

CT2 and CT4 whereas CT5 and CT6 recorded significantly lower per cent aggregate stability.<br />

Among the tillage practices, CT 4 recorded significantly higher MWHC <strong>of</strong> the soil (54.0 % )<br />

followed by CT 1 and CT 3. However, CT 5 revealed significantly lower MWHC than<br />

conservation tillage practices (50.6 %). Data showed that tillage systems significantly<br />

influenced the SOC content. Among the tillage practices CT 1 and CT 3 recorded significantly<br />

higher SOC content (8.84 and 8.76 g kg -1 ) over CT5 and CT6 (6.31 and 5.46 g kg -1<br />

respectively). At 15-30 cm depth data showed CT5 recorded significantly higher SOC content<br />

(6.16 g kg -1 ) as compared to rest <strong>of</strong> the tillage practices. In 0-30 cm soil depths, indicating<br />

SOC content <strong>of</strong> surface soil was higher as compared to sub surface In conventional tillage<br />

with no crop residues system, lower soil organic carbon content and further destruction <strong>of</strong><br />

soil aggregates through tillage resulted in loss <strong>of</strong> occluded intra aggregate particulate organic<br />

matter carbon in soil which contribute long term soil carbon sequestration in agricultural soils<br />

(Six et al., 2004).The data on available soil NPK at 0-15cm soil depth showed that tillage<br />

systems significantly influenced the available soil nutrients. Among the tillage practices CT1<br />

recorded significantly higher available soil NPK (290, 41.9 and 449.5 kg ha -1 respectively).<br />

At 15-30 cm soil depth data showed that CT5 and CT6 revealed significantly higher soil<br />

available N (223.6 and 207.9 kg ha -1 respectively) as compared to conservation tillage<br />

practices. The presence <strong>of</strong> mineral soil NPK available for plant uptake is dependent on the<br />

rate <strong>of</strong> carbon mineralisation (Sharma et al., 2021). Retention <strong>of</strong> crop residues might have<br />

reduced the surface area <strong>of</strong> crop biomass for microbial decomposition resulting in slower<br />

decomposition and long duration retention which in-turn helped in release <strong>of</strong> nutrients for a<br />

longer period<br />

Conclusion<br />

Combination <strong>of</strong> no tillage with BBF and FB and crop residues retained on the surface in<br />

groundnut-sorghum system recorded significantly improved soil physical and chemical<br />

properties.<br />

References<br />

Mohanty, A. and Mishra, K. N. 2014. Influence <strong>of</strong> conservation agriculture production<br />

system on available soil nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium and maize equivalent<br />

yield on a fluventic haplustepts in the north central plateau zone <strong>of</strong> Odisha. Trends<br />

in Biosci. 7(23): 3962-3967<br />

587 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Sharma, P. C., Fagodiya, R. K. and Jat, H. S. 2021. Nitrogen management in conservation<br />

agriculture-based cropping systems. Indian J. Fert. 17(11): 1166-1179<br />

Six, J., Bossuyt, H., Degryze, S. and Denef, K. 2004. A history <strong>of</strong> research on the link<br />

between (micro) aggregates, soil biota, and soil organic matter dynamics. Soil Till.<br />

Res. 79: 7-31<br />

Effect <strong>of</strong> different tillage systems on soil physical and chemical properties<br />

Tillage systems CT1 CT2 CT3 CT4 CT5 CT6 S.Em<br />

±<br />

CD<br />

(0.05)<br />

Soil aggregate stability (%) 63.2 62.7 63.0 63.1 61.2 60.6 0.18 0.56<br />

MWHC (%) 53.9 53.8 53.7 54.0 50.6 48.0 0.13 0.38<br />

SOC (g kg -1 ) at 0-15cm depth 8.84 8.68 8.76 8.49 6.31 5.46 0.08 0.25<br />

SOC (g kg -1 ) at 15-30cm depth 5.27 5.30 5.19 5.22 6.16 5.45 0.05 0.16<br />

Available N (kg ha -1 ) at 0-15cm<br />

depth<br />

Available N (kg ha -1 ) at 15-30cm<br />

depth<br />

Available P (kg ha -1 ) at 0-15cm<br />

depth<br />

Available P (kg ha -1 ) at 15-30cm<br />

depth<br />

Available K (kg ha -1 ) at 0-15cm<br />

depth<br />

Available K (kg ha -1 ) at 15-30cm<br />

depth<br />

290.8 286.9 287.5 281.5 270.8 254.2 2.09 6.17<br />

198.8 199.6 199.9 199.0 223.6 207.9 0.61 1.80<br />

41.9 40.3 41.3 40.5 38.4 28.0 0.57 1.68<br />

26.3 26.2 27.1 26.6 31.4 26.8 0.18 0.52<br />

449.5 447.7 448.8 445.8 426.1 376.5 3.54 10.45<br />

384.2 384.0 385.3 383.7 403.7 365.6 0.82 2.43<br />

Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture<br />

588 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

T4a-11R-1127<br />

Co-Application <strong>of</strong> Biochar and Inorganic Fertilizer Improves Soil Fertility and Crop<br />

Productivity in Maize-Groundnut Cropping System in Semi-Arid Alfisols<br />

K. C. Nataraja 1 , S. N. Malleswari Sadhineni 1 , G. Narayana Swamy 1 , Ch. Srinivasarao 2 ,<br />

D. Balaguraviah 1 , M. V. S. Naidu 1 , Y. Reddi Ramu, 1 P. Lavanya Kumari 1 and<br />

T. Giridhara Krishna 1<br />

1 Acharya N.G. Ranga Agricultural University, Andhra Pradesh<br />

2 ICAR-National Academy Agricultural Research Management, Hyderabad - 500030, Telangana<br />

The man induced climate change, posed an adverse impact on soil health and crop<br />

productivity. It is crucial to maintain threshold level <strong>of</strong> organic matter in soil to perform its<br />

agricultural production and environmental functions (Srinivasarao et al., 2014). In this<br />

context, there is a considerable interest in the concept <strong>of</strong> applying biochar to soil as long term<br />

sink for carbon thereby mitigating climate change. In addition to being an important emission<br />

neutral technology, biochar is a multifunctional option. Hence, the addition <strong>of</strong> biochar is<br />

complementary to diverse land uses in semi-arid agro ecosystem (Lal et al., 2018). In light <strong>of</strong><br />

the above scenario, co application <strong>of</strong> biochar and inorganic fertilizer and its effect on crop<br />

growth was evaluated in maize-groundnut cropping system under hot, semi-arid Alfisols <strong>of</strong><br />

southern Andhra Pradesh, India.<br />

Methodology<br />

Field experiment was conducted in split-split plot design with fixed plot for both Kharif and<br />

Rabi during 2018 to 2020 at Agricultural Research Station, Ananthapuramu under Acharya<br />

N.G. Ranga Agricultural University, Andhra Pradesh, India. 75 % Recommended dose <strong>of</strong><br />

inorganic fertilizer (RDF) as (F1) and 100% as (F2). Pigeonpea biochar (B1) and cotton<br />

biochar (B2) and their respective crop residues as (B3 and B4) were treated as sub plots.<br />

Biochar and their respective crop residues were applied at the rate 0 t ha -1 , 2 t ha -1 and 4 t ha -1<br />

as sub - sub plot treatments. All the treatments were applied with common basal dose <strong>of</strong> RDF<br />

for maize during kharif and for groundnut during rabi. Sub plot treatment with 0 t ha -1 <strong>of</strong><br />

fertilizer was considered as fertilized control. Biochar application was only to Kharif maize in<br />

both the years and its residual effect was studied on groundnut during Rabi.<br />

Results<br />

The impact <strong>of</strong> combined application <strong>of</strong> biochar along with RDF in maize-groundnut cropping<br />

system under hot, semi-arid Alfisols is presented in table 1. The pooled statistically analyzed<br />

data reveals that, highest plant height at harvest was recorded in maize with the application <strong>of</strong><br />

100% RDF + pigeonpea biochar @ 4 t ha -1 followed by 2 t ha -1 and fertilized control<br />

treatments. The carry over effect <strong>of</strong> biochar on Rabi groundnut was also noticed the similar<br />

trend. Similarly, the conjunctive use <strong>of</strong> 100% RDF + pigeonpea biochar @ 4 t ha -1 recorded<br />

589 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

highest hundred grain weight (g) or test weight <strong>of</strong> maize during Kharif and highest 100 kernel<br />

weight (g) during rabi with application <strong>of</strong> pigeonpea biochar @ 4 t ha -1 followed 2 t ha -1 and<br />

fertilized control. However, the biomass yield with respect Kharif grown maize and residual<br />

effect <strong>of</strong> biochar on rabi grown groundnut was also followed the similar trend wherein,<br />

pigeonpea biochar @ 4 t ha -1 yielded highest stover yield in maize and highest haulm yield in<br />

groundnut compared to lowest in fertilized control. Besides, available nutrient status in soil<br />

improved. This might be due to positive effect <strong>of</strong> biochar along with inorganic fertilizer<br />

influenced the soil pH, WHC, increased soil available N, P, K and balanced nutrient uptake.<br />

Further, biochar at higher dose effectively promoted nutrient absorption by crop eventually,<br />

more synchronization <strong>of</strong> nutrients to crop growth. The results were in agreement with those<br />

as reported by Feng et al. (2021).<br />

Conclusion<br />

Integrated application <strong>of</strong> pigeonpea biochar @ 4 t ha -1 along with RDF for maize and residual<br />

effect <strong>of</strong> biochar in rabi influenced the soil physico chemical properties and soil fertility,<br />

eventually increased crop growth. Thus, co application <strong>of</strong> biochar and inorganic fertilizer not<br />

only effective in improving soil fertility but also improves crop productivity in semi-arid<br />

Alfisols<br />

Effect <strong>of</strong> co application <strong>of</strong> biochar and inorganic fertilizer on the growth attributes <strong>of</strong><br />

Treatment<br />

Type <strong>of</strong> biochar / Crop residue<br />

maize-groundnut cropping sequence in semi-arid Alfisols.<br />

Plant<br />

height<br />

(cm) at<br />

harvest<br />

Kharif maize<br />

100 grain<br />

weight<br />

(g)<br />

Stover<br />

yield<br />

(kg ha -1 )<br />

Plant<br />

height (cm)<br />

at harvest<br />

Rabi groundnut<br />

100 kernel<br />

weight (g)<br />

Haulm<br />

yield<br />

(kg ha -1 )<br />

B 1 (Pigeonpea ) 203.2 31.62 9542 32.5 44.8 3796<br />

B 2 (Cotton) 202.0 30.85 9405 32.2 44.4 3750<br />

B 3 (Pigeonpea crop residue) 200.3 30.14 9236 31.7 43.3 3691<br />

B 4 (Cotton residue) 198.3 29.59 9095 31.4 43.0 3576<br />

SEm± 1.76 0.32 100.1 0.39 0.14 35.40<br />

LSD (P = 0.05) NS 0.92 292.1 NS 0.40 103.3<br />

Level <strong>of</strong> biochar / Crop residue<br />

S 1 (0 t ha -1 ) 188.3 29.70 8741 29.5 40.9 3187<br />

S 2 (2 t ha -1 ) 205.1 30.58 9439 32.4 44.7 3898<br />

S 3 (4 t ha -1 ) 209.4 31.36 9778 33.9 46.1 4024<br />

SEm± 1.52 0.24 72.7 0.33 0.10 29.27<br />

LSD (P = 0.05) 4.29 0.67 205.4 0.94 0.28 82.7<br />

RDF Fertilizer level<br />

F 1 (75 %) 199.3 30.40 9080 31.1 43.6 3680<br />

Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture<br />

590 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

F 2 (100 %) 202.6 30.70 9559 32.8 44.11 3726<br />

SEm± 1.67 0.29 55.1 0.20 0.12 30.98<br />

LSD (P = 0.05) NS NS 216.3 0.77 NS NS<br />

References<br />

Srinivasarao, Ch., Rattan Lal, Sumanta Kundu, Prasad Babu, M. B. B., Venkateswarlu, B.,<br />

and Anil Kumar, Singh. 2014. Soil carbon sequestration in rainfed production systems<br />

in the semiarid tropics <strong>of</strong> India. Sci. Total Environ. 487: 587-603.<br />

Lal, R., Smith, P., Jungkunst, H. F., Mitsch, W. J., Lehmann, J., Ramachandran Nair, P. K.,<br />

Alex, B., Mc Bratney, Moraes Sa, J. C. D., Schneider, J., Zinn, Y. L., Skorupa, A. L.<br />

A., Zhang, H. L. Minasny, B., Srinivasrao, Ch., and Ravindranath, N. H. 2018. The<br />

carbon sequestration potential <strong>of</strong> terrestrial ecosystems. J Soil Water Conserv. 73(6):<br />

145A-152A.<br />

Feng, W. Y., Yang, F., Cen, R., Liu, J., Qu, Z. Y., and Miao, Q. F. 2021. Effects <strong>of</strong> straw<br />

biochar application on soil temperature, available nitrogen and growth <strong>of</strong> corn. J.<br />

Environ. Manage. 277. Accessed at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111331.<br />

T4a-11aR-1175<br />

Tillage, residue and nutrient management practices influence soil biology and organic<br />

carbon pools <strong>of</strong> sugarcane cropping system in semi-arid tropics<br />

Aliza Pradhan, G C Wakchaure, Dhanashri Shid, and Jagadish Rane<br />

ICAR-National Institute <strong>of</strong> Abiotic Stress Management, Baramati, 413115 MH<br />

Intensive tillage coupled with crop residue burning and conventional agronomic practices in<br />

sugarcane (Saccharum <strong>of</strong>ficinarum L.) cropping system is a serious issue causing soil<br />

degradation and environmental pollution. Globally the principles <strong>of</strong> minimum soil<br />

disturbance, crop residue management and suitable nutrient management practices have<br />

emerged as alternative strategies for enriching the soil resource base (Jat et al., 2019). For a<br />

sustainable agricultural production system, soil organic carbon and soil biology is vital as<br />

they regulate all the other chemical, physical and biological properties (Parihar et al., 2018).<br />

A number <strong>of</strong> research studies have reported the potential <strong>of</strong> these strategies to serve many<br />

ecosystem functions such as enhanced soil enzymatic activity, microbial count, carbon<br />

sequestration, increased resource use efficiency, making the system resilient towards extreme<br />

climate events and climate change mitigation (Choudhary et al., 2018; Datta et al., 2019; Jat<br />

et al., 2019). However, benefits <strong>of</strong> these strategies are needed to be effectively reaped in<br />

sugarcane production system that occupies 5 million ha acreage and utilizes more than 5% <strong>of</strong><br />

country’s irrigation resources on merely 2.6% <strong>of</strong> the net cultivated area and produces 108<br />

million tonnes <strong>of</strong> crop residues, annually. In sugarcane-based cropping system, trash burning<br />

591 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

either before or after harvest is a common practice which not only reduces the amount <strong>of</strong><br />

surface organic matter, soil organic carbon (SOC), essential nutrients, and microbial count<br />

but also causes environmental pollution. Reports on dynamics <strong>of</strong> SOC in different pools and<br />

their relationship with soil biology under climate smart management systems in sugarcane<br />

cropping system is very scanty. Keeping this in view, a field experiment was conducted to<br />

evaluate the effects <strong>of</strong> reduced tillage, residue and nutrient management practices on soil<br />

organic carbon pools, soil biological properties and their interrelationships with system yield<br />

after six years <strong>of</strong> continuous cultivation <strong>of</strong> sugarcane in Semi-arid regions <strong>of</strong> India.<br />

Methodology<br />

During 2016-2022, a field experiment was conducted at ICAR-National Institute <strong>of</strong> Abiotic<br />

Stress Management, Baramati, Maharashtra with hot and semi-arid climate. Majority <strong>of</strong><br />

agricultural area is rainfed with low annual rainfall (584 mm) received mostly in June-<br />

December restricted to south-west (70%) and retreating (21%) monsoons. The predominant<br />

medium black soil (≤ 60 cm depth) at the site was sandy clay in texture (sand, silt, clay, 55.6,<br />

8.3, 36.1, respectively). The pH (1: 2.5 soil: water suspension), EC, available N, P, K and<br />

organic C <strong>of</strong> soil were about 8.1, 0.26 dS m -1 , 172.2, 18.2, 143.8 kg ha -1 and 6.7 g kg -1 ,<br />

respectively. The experiment was laid out in split-split plot design and replicated thrice with<br />

tillage as main plot treatments viz., conventional tillage (CT) and reduced tillage (RT);<br />

residue (R) managements practices i.e. RR (residue retention) and RB (residue burning) in<br />

sub plots and three nutrient management practices <strong>of</strong> different ratios <strong>of</strong> recommended doses<br />

<strong>of</strong> fertilizer (RDF) in sub-sub plots i.e. 25: 75 (N1); 50: 50 (N2); and 75: 25 (N3) during<br />

basal and subsequent fertigation, respectively. Soil samples were collected from (0-15) and<br />

(15-30) cm soil depths after six years <strong>of</strong> the study i.e. after harvest <strong>of</strong> one fresh and four<br />

ratoon sugarcane crops. The soil samples were analyzed for SOC content, its pools, soil<br />

enzymes and microbial counts following the standard operating procedures as followed in<br />

Datta et al., 2015 and Choudhary et al., 2018). Statistical analyses were executed with general<br />

linear models (GLMs) using the “Agricolae” package <strong>of</strong> R (R Development Team, 2011).<br />

Results<br />

Soil enzymes and microbial population<br />

Soil dehydrogenase activity (DHA), alkaline phosphatase activity (APA) and ß-glucosidase<br />

activity (BGA) were significantly affected by tillage, residue and nutrient management<br />

practices (Table 1). In the (0-15) cm soil layer, reduced tillage had 322, 36 and 55% higher<br />

DHA, APA and BGA, respectively than CT. Plots with residue had 83% higher DHA as<br />

compared to residue removal plots. A similar trend was seen for APA and BGA with 16%<br />

higher activity in RR plots than RB. For nutrient management practices, the enzyme<br />

activities were found in order <strong>of</strong> N2 (50% RDF as basal and rest 50% through fertigation) ><br />

Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture<br />

592 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

N3 (75% RDF as basal and 25% through fertigation) > N1 (25% RDF as basal and 75%<br />

through fertigation). Plots under N2 had 64, 11 and 18% higher DHA, APA and BGA,<br />

respectively than N1. A similar trend with lower values was observed at 15-30 cm depth.<br />

Microbial population viz., bacteria, fungi and actinomycetes was significantly affected by<br />

tillage, residue and nutrient management practices. Population <strong>of</strong> bacteria was higher<br />

compared to fungi and actinomycetes at both the soil depths though the counts were lower at<br />

(15-30) cm depth as compared to upper (0-15) cm depth. Compared to CT the counts <strong>of</strong><br />

bacteria, fungi and actinomycetes were 51, 39 and 73% higher in RT and 41, 38 and 72%<br />

higher in RR as compared to RB, respectively. The treatments having application <strong>of</strong> >50% <strong>of</strong><br />

RDF as basal (N2 and N3) had higher microbial population i.e. 40%, 60% and 70% bacteria,<br />

fungi and actinomycetes, respectively as compared to N1.<br />

Effect <strong>of</strong> tillage, residue and nutrient management on soil enzymes and microbial<br />

population<br />

Treatments<br />

Tillage (T)<br />

Dehydrogenase<br />

activity<br />

(µg TPF g -1 h -1 )<br />

Alkaline<br />

phosphatase<br />

activity<br />

(µg p-<br />

nitrophenol<br />

g -1 h -1 )<br />

ß-glucosidase<br />

activity<br />

(µg p-<br />

nitrophenol<br />

g -1 h -1 )<br />

Bacteria<br />

(CFU x 10 10<br />

g -1 soil)<br />

Fungi<br />

(CFU x<br />

10 10 g -1<br />

soil)<br />

0-15 15-30 0-15 15-30 0-15 15-30 0-15 15-30 0-15 15-<br />

30<br />

Actinomycetes<br />

(CFU x 10 10 g -1<br />

soil)<br />

0-15 15-30<br />

CT 21.67 b 17.40 b 203.64 b 197.19 b 17.14 b 16.30 b 7.93 b 6.67 b 5.69 b 4.63 b 4.43 b 3.33 b<br />

RT 91.37 a 85.76 a 276.27 a 268.06 a 26.50 a 25.63 a 11.20 a 10.06 a 7.92 a 7.66 a 7.66 a 7.48 a<br />

Residue (R)<br />

RR 43.13 b 38.61 b 227.00 b 219.45 b 20.61 b 19.73 b 7.95 b 6.78 b 5.68 b 4.64 b 4.43 b 3.41 b<br />

RB 78.79 a 73.58 a 263.50 a 255.54 a 24.98 a 24.08 a 11.19 a 10.99 a 7.83 a 7.66 a 7.61 a 7.49 a<br />

Nutrient (N)<br />

N1 41.56 c 36.69 c 226.57 c 218.86 c 20.04 b 19.12 b 7.93 b 6.86 b 5.63 b 4.59 b 4.47 b 3.43 b<br />

N2 73.24 a 68.97 a 257.26 a 249.81 a 24.61 a 23.68 a 11.17 a 10.94 a 7.87 a 7.68 a 7.59 a 7.53 a<br />

N3 68.08 b 62.63 b 251.93 b 243.82 b 23.74 a 22.91 a 11.11 a 10.86 a 7.77 a 7.69 a 7.52 a 7.39 a<br />

Different lower-case letters within same column show significant difference at P=0.05 as per<br />

Duncan Multiple Range test for mean separation<br />

Soil organic carbon content and its pools<br />

Results showed that total SOC was increased by 12 and 17% under RT and residue retention,<br />

respectively as compared CT and RB plots at 0-15 cm soil depths. In surface layer, active and<br />

passive pool carbon (6.98 and 19.45 Mg C ha-1) was 14% and 18% higher in RR plots as<br />

compared to RB, respectively after six years <strong>of</strong> continuous sugarcane cropping. Again, plots<br />

with residue retention had 63, 34 and 15% higher labile, less labile and non-labile pools,<br />

593 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

respectively as compared to residue burning plots. Below soil layer (15-30) cm also showed a<br />

similar trend with lower values though the effects were non-significant.<br />

Effect <strong>of</strong> tillage, residue and nutrient management on total soil organic carbon and its<br />

pools<br />

Treatments/soil<br />

depths (cm)<br />

Tillage (T)<br />

Total soil organic<br />

carbon (SOC)<br />

(Mg C ha -1 )<br />

Very labile<br />

SOC<br />

(Mg C ha -1 )<br />

0-15 15-30 0-15 15-<br />

30<br />

Labile SOC<br />

(Mg C ha -1 )<br />

0-15 15-<br />

30<br />

Less labile<br />

SOC<br />

(Mg C ha -1 )<br />

0-15 15-<br />

30<br />

Non labile<br />

SOC<br />

(Mg C ha -1 )<br />

Active SOC<br />

pool<br />

(Mg C ha -1 )<br />

0-15 15-30 0-15 15-<br />

30<br />

Passive SOC<br />

pool<br />

(Mg C ha -1 )<br />

0-15 15-30<br />

CT 23.06 b 25.30 a 3.98 a 4.38 a 1.76 a 1.93 a 2.79 a 2.72 a 14.46 b 15.84 a 5.74 a 6.31 a 17.33 a 18.99 a<br />

RT 25.89 a 26.40 a 4.89 a 5.02 a 2.36 a 2.37 a 2.87 a 3.14 a 16.07 a 16.39 a 7.05 a 7.30 a 18.85 a 19.10 a<br />

Residue (R)<br />

RR 22.65 b 24.73 a 4.47 a 4.55 a 1.55 b 1.69 b 2.29 b 2.49 b 14.25 b 15.54 a 6.11 b 6.70 a 16.54 b 18.03 a<br />

RB 26.43 a 26.64 a 4.57 a 5.01 a 2.52 a 2.57 a 3.08 a 3.07 a 16.37 a 16.45 a 6.98 a 7.12 a 19.45 a 19.53 a<br />

Nutrient (N)<br />

N1 24.43 a 24.45 a 4.45 a 4.47 a 1.93 a 1.94 a 2.88 a 2.88 a 15.26 a 15.14 b 6.38 a 6.41 b 18.14 a 18.02 a<br />

N2 24.68 a 26.53 a 4.68 a 5.03 a 2.07 a 2.24 a 2.64 a 2.74 a 15.39 a 16.53 a 6.74 a 7.27 a 17.93 a 19.25 a<br />

N3 24.52 a 26.11 a 4.43 a 4.83 a 2.10 a 2.22 a 2.54 a 2.72 a 15.26 a 16.32 ab 6.52 a 7.05 a 17.91 a 19.06 a<br />

Different lower-case letters within same column show significant difference at P=0.05 as per<br />

Duncan Multiple Range test for mean separation<br />

Conclusion<br />

Minimum soil disturbance with residue retention improved soil organic carbon pools whereas<br />

these practices coupled with appropriate nutrient management practice had higher soil<br />

enzymatic activities and microbial count after six years <strong>of</strong> continuous cropping <strong>of</strong> sugarcane.<br />

Therefore, these practices should be recommended to sugarcane growers for sustainability <strong>of</strong><br />

the cropping system while maintaining the soil resource base.<br />

References<br />

Choudhary, M., Datta, A., Jat, H.S., Yadav, A.K., Gathala, M.K., Sapkota, T.B., Das, A.K.,<br />

Sharma, P.C., Jat, M.L., Singh, R., Ladha, J.K., 2018. Changes in soil biology under<br />

conservation agriculture based sustainable intensification <strong>of</strong> cereal systems in<br />

indoGangetic Plains. Geoderma 313, 193–204.<br />

Datta, A., Basak, N., Chaudhari, S.K., Sharma, D.K., 2015. Soil properties and organic<br />

carbon distribution under different land uses in reclaimed sodic soils <strong>of</strong> north-West<br />

India. Geoderma Reg 4, 134–146.<br />

Jat, H.S., Datta, A., Choudhary, M., Yadav, A.K., Choudhary, V., Sharma, P.C., Gathala,<br />

M.K., Jat, M.L., McDonald, A., 2019. Effects <strong>of</strong> tillage, crop establishment and<br />

diversification on soil organic carbon, aggregation, aggregate associated carbon and<br />

Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture<br />

594 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

productivity in cereal systems <strong>of</strong> semi-arid Northwest India. Soil Tillage Res. 190, 128–<br />

138.<br />

Parihar, C.M., Jat, S.L., Singh, A.K., Datta, A., Parihar, M.D., Varghese, E., Bandyopadhyay,<br />

K.K., Nayak, H.S., Kuri, B.R., Jat, M.L., 2018. Changes in carbon pools and biological<br />

activities <strong>of</strong> a sandy loam soil under medium-term conservation agriculture and<br />

diversified cropping systems. European J. <strong>of</strong> Soil Sci. 69 (5), 902–912.<br />

T4a-12P-1031<br />

Assessment <strong>of</strong> Soil Physical Properties from Different Blocks <strong>of</strong> Jaipur<br />

district, Rajasthan, India<br />

Surykant Sharma*<br />

Sam Higginbottom University <strong>of</strong> Agriculture, Technology and Sciences, Prayagraj – 211007, U.P.<br />

*surykantsharma.ag@gmail.com<br />

Soil is a dynamic natural body formed as a result <strong>of</strong> pedogenic processes by changing rock<br />

climates, including minerals and organic elements, with chemical, physical, mineralogical<br />

and biological properties, with varying depth <strong>of</strong> surface, and providing medium to plant<br />

growth. (Thakre et al.,2012). Because <strong>of</strong> urbanization infrastructural expansion, industrial<br />

growth, and land degradation losses due to rapid erosion and secondary salinization, the<br />

arable land area has been shrinking (Lal, 2013). Generally, the soil types <strong>of</strong> Rajasthan are<br />

sandy, saline, alkaline, and calcareous soils and were commonly called clay, loamy, and<br />

black lava soils. Groundwater level is very low because the annual rainfall is approximately<br />

360 mm and the ground water level very deep. Water is available at depths <strong>of</strong> 100 to 61<br />

meters. The soil <strong>of</strong> the Rajasthan region is classified as Aridisols, Alfisols, Entisol,<br />

Inceptisols and Vertisol according to the USDA Land Division program (Chiroma et al.,<br />

2014). The capital <strong>of</strong> Rajasthan is the state <strong>of</strong> Jaipur, located between 26˚55′10ʺ N and<br />

75˚47′16ʺ E. Jaipur has an average height <strong>of</strong> 1414 feet from sea level and Jaipur 11,152 km 2 .<br />

The weather in Jaipur is desert. The average annual temperature is 25.2°C. The average<br />

rainfall in the Jaipur region is estimated at 650 mm. This type <strong>of</strong> climate and climate are<br />

applicable to kharif crops for example pearl millet, groundnut, cluster bean, sorghum, green<br />

gram and rabies plants wheat, mustard, barley, gram, pea, rapeseed, and taramira. The current<br />

research was conducted to examine the visible soil structures from different blocks in the<br />

Jaipur region (District Fact <strong>Book</strong>, 2019).<br />

Methodology<br />

The study area was marked and divided in 3 blocks and in each block where selected 3<br />

villages from the Jaipur district, they are Keshav Nagar (V 1), Morija (V 2), Nindola (V 3) in<br />

Chomu block (B1), Goner (V4), Shrikishanpura (V5) and Durgapura (V6), block in Sanganer<br />

595 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

(B2), and Shivpuri (V7), Manoharpur (V8), Nwalpura (V9), block in Shahpura (B3). At<br />

collection <strong>of</strong> soil sampling site-, twenty-seven soil samples were collected at different depths<br />

<strong>of</strong> 0-15 cm, 15-30 cm and 30-45 cm. Soil samples were collected randomly from a site using<br />

Khurpi and Phawrah and Auger the depth <strong>of</strong> (a) 0-15cm, (b) 15-30cm, (c) 30-45 cm.<br />

Composite soil samples (by the process <strong>of</strong> conning and quartering method) was collected by<br />

Stratified soil sampling. After collecting the soil samples, they were analysed following<br />

standard laboratory procedures. brought to the laboratory.<br />

Results<br />

The results showed in soils from different villages <strong>of</strong> most <strong>of</strong> Jaipur district soils, Sandy<br />

Loam Texture was discovered at three depths (0-15 cm, 15-30 cm, and 30-45 cm) (Table-2).<br />

The percentages <strong>of</strong> sand, silt, and clay ranged from 60.11 to 72.60 percent, 13.35 to 24.59<br />

percent, and 12.35 to 15.62 percent, respectively. The soil color <strong>of</strong> soil also noticed in both<br />

the Air- dry condition and wet condition. The Soil color was Light Yellowish-Brown<br />

(10YR6/4) color to brownish yellow (10YR5/8) (Table-3). The results showed in soils from<br />

different villages The maximum bulk density was 1.35 Mg m -3 at 30-45 cm in village Morija<br />

(V 2), and the lowest bulk density was 1.22 Mg m -3 at 0-15 cm in village Nwalpura (V 9). with<br />

increasing soil depths, the bulk density increases. At depth 30-45 cm in village Morija (V2),<br />

the maximum particle density was 2.37 Mg m -3 , while at 0-15 cm in village Shivpuri, the<br />

minimum particle density was 2.24 Mg m -3 (V7). Bulk density is lower than particle density.<br />

The largest percent pore space was reported at 0-15 cm in village Keshav Nagar (V 1), while<br />

the smallest percent pore space was measured at 30-45 cm in village Shivpuri (V 7). The %<br />

pore space decreases sharply as depth increases. The maximum water holding capacity was<br />

found 60.12 % at 0-15cm in village Nwalpura (V 9 ) and minimum water holding capacity %<br />

was found 41.27 % at 30-45 cm in village Morija (V 2 ) (Table-1). These variations were due<br />

to clay, silt and organic carbon content and low Water holding capacity in sandy soils due to<br />

high sand and less clay content. However, in Village Shivpuri (V7) had the highest specific<br />

gravity <strong>of</strong> 2.56 at 30-45 cm, while village Morija had the lowest specific gravity <strong>of</strong> 2.33 at 0-<br />

15 cm (V 2). Clay, silt, and organic carbon concentration all played a role, as did low Water<br />

holding capacity in sandy soils due to high sand and low clay content.<br />

Conclusion<br />

The soil <strong>of</strong> investigated area was sandy loam textured soil.<br />

The soil color was light<br />

Yellowish-Brown to brownish yellow which signifies a good organic matter. Improve <strong>of</strong> soil<br />

health by using organic manure and bio fertilizers and improve soil physical condition at<br />

study area, depth from upper to lower soil layers pore space % decrease because soil<br />

compacted, that is not suitable for good soil aeration. Growing Bajara, Mustard, Barley,<br />

Wheat, Tomato, Cole crops and Gram crops are suitable at present study area.<br />

Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture<br />

596 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

References<br />

Chiroma, A. K. and Singh, J. S. 2014. Soil characteristics and vegetation development <strong>of</strong> an<br />

age series <strong>of</strong> mine spoil in a dry tropical environment. Vegetation, 97: 63–76.<br />

District Factbook. 2019. Rajasthan District Factbook Jaipur district. Key Socio-economic<br />

Data <strong>of</strong> Jaipur district, Rajasthan. District Pr<strong>of</strong>ile – Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Jaipur<br />

2019.<br />

Lal, R. 2013. Soil and Sanskriti. J. Indian Soc. Soil Sci., 61: 267-274<br />

Thakre Y. G., Dr. Choudhary M. D., Dr. Raut R. D. 2012. Physicochemical Characterization<br />

<strong>of</strong> Red and Black Soils <strong>of</strong> Wardha Region, Int. J. Chem. and Phys. Sci.,1(2): 60-65.<br />

T4a-13P-1301<br />

Appraisal <strong>of</strong> Some Soil Physical Properties and Available Micronutrients under<br />

Organic and Conventional Farming Systems in an Inceptisol<br />

Priyanka Meena, Y.S. Shivay and Manoj Shrivastava<br />

ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110012, India<br />

priyankameena28@gmail.com, manojshrivastava31@gmail.com<br />

Worldwide land under organic farming in 2017-18 encompassed more than 69.8 million<br />

hectares and India has around 1.78 m ha under organic farming. Trace elements have<br />

important role in plant and animal nutrition and their deficiencies and toxicities cause adverse<br />

effects on plant growth. There is a need to maintain optimal concentrations <strong>of</strong> micronutrients<br />

in soil and plant to the attainment <strong>of</strong> optimum economic yields <strong>of</strong> crops and animal<br />

productivity and welfare. A field study has been conducted to investigate the available<br />

micronutrients in different aggregates under organic and conventional farming practices. The<br />

field experiment was, thus, conducted at the research farm <strong>of</strong> the Indian Agricultural<br />

Research Institute, New Delhi on sandy clay-loam soil starting from Kharif 2006 under the<br />

rice-wheat cropping system. The experiment was laid out in a randomized block design with<br />

three replications and eight treatments in a set. The treatments consisted <strong>of</strong> control (T1),<br />

farmyard manure (FYM@ 10 t/ha) applied to only rice (T2); FYM @ 10 t/ha applied to only<br />

wheat (T3); FYM @ 10 t/ha applied to rice and wheat (T4); Sesbania green manure (SGM) to<br />

rice and Leucaena green leaf manuring (LGLM) to wheat (T5); SGM+Blue Green Algae<br />

(BGA) and LGLM+Azotobacter to wheat (T6); SGM+FYM to rice and LGLM+FYM to<br />

wheat (T7); and SGM+FYM+BGA to rice and LGLM+FYM+Azotobacter to wheat (T8). In<br />

this study, the effect <strong>of</strong> organic amendments was evaluated on physical soil properties i.e.,<br />

different size aggregates and yield <strong>of</strong> the respective system by sampling the soil from three<br />

depths (0-15, 15-30, and 30-60 cm) for two seasons in rice and wheat (2020-2021 and 2021-<br />

2022). The results were found to be improved in T8 in the case <strong>of</strong> the yield <strong>of</strong> rice and wheat.<br />

597 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Although the soil aggregate was significantly affected by organic amendments, but the<br />

maximum Mean weight diameter (MWD) was observed in T8 followed by T7, T6, and T4 at<br />

the soil depths <strong>of</strong> 0-15 cm. A similar trend was observed in the other depths. The<br />

concentration <strong>of</strong> Zn, Mn, Fe, and Cu was found significantly higher in 0-15 cm soil depth as<br />

compared to other depths. Our results clearly indicated that the cumulative effect <strong>of</strong><br />

GM+FYM+BGA leads to increased productivity, improved soil physical properties, and as<br />

well as micronutrient availability.<br />

T4a-14P-1580<br />

Conservation Agriculture Approach as Climate Change Mitigation<br />

Pooja Jena 1 , Arabind Kumar Sinha 2 , Shailabala Dei 1 , A.S. Tigga 1 and Basant Kumar<br />

Rajak 3*<br />

1 Bihar agricultural University, Sabour (Bihar)<br />

2 Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Bhagalpur (Bihar)<br />

3 Atal Bihari Vajapeyi Institute for Good Governance & Policy Analysis (AIGGP), Bhopal (Madhya<br />

Pradesh)<br />

*basant.rajak@gmail.com<br />

Climate change is undoubtedly induced and accelerated by human activity and can pose a<br />

serious threat to mankind by reducing food production. Significant weather aberrations in<br />

form <strong>of</strong> the uneven precipitation pattern, more frequent and intense occurrence <strong>of</strong><br />

temperature fluctuations accompanied by changes in wind intensity and frequency, amount <strong>of</strong><br />

clouds, intensity and quality <strong>of</strong> sunlight can be expected. Maybe the most vulnerable sector<br />

affected by climate change is agriculture. So, it is important to mitigate and adapt to a new<br />

situation through different and most adaptable agricultural strategies. There is a need to<br />

quantify agriculture’s potential to sequester carbon (C) to inform global approaches aimed at<br />

mitigating climate change effects. Many factors including climate, crop, soil management<br />

practices, and soil type can influence the contribution <strong>of</strong> agriculture to the global carbon<br />

cycle. Conservation agriculture is as an approach to farming that seeks to increase food<br />

security, alleviate poverty, conserve biodiversity and safeguard ecosystem services.<br />

Conservation agriculture practices can also contribute to making agricultural systems more<br />

resilient to climate change. Conservation agriculture increases and sustains the crop<br />

productivities, mitigates greenhouse gas emissions from agriculture by enhancing soil carbon<br />

sequestration, improving soil nutrient status and water use efficiencies, and reducing fuel<br />

consumption. Mainstreaming <strong>of</strong> Conservation agriculture systems in India is hindered by its<br />

knowledge gap, inadequate farm machineries and tools, small holdings, poor infrastructures,<br />

and lack <strong>of</strong> conservation agriculture friendly policy support.<br />

Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture<br />

598 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

T4a-15P - 1061<br />

Conservation Agriculture in Himalayan States <strong>of</strong> India: Prospects and<br />

Research Challenges Ahead<br />

Raman Jeet Singh*, N.K. Sharma, Gopal Kumar, Trisha Roy, Uday Mandal, A.K.<br />

Gupta, Rama Pal, J.S. Deshwal and M. Madhu<br />

ICAR-Indian Institute <strong>of</strong> Soil and Water Conservation, Dehradun 248 195<br />

*rdxsingh@gmail.com<br />

Issues <strong>of</strong> conservation have assumed importance in view <strong>of</strong> widespread resource degradation<br />

and the need to reduce production costs, increase pr<strong>of</strong>itability and make agriculture more<br />

competitive. Conservation Agriculture (CA) which has its roots in universal principles <strong>of</strong><br />

providing permanent soil cover (through crop residues, cover crops, and agro-forestry),<br />

minimum soil disturbance, and crop rotations is now considered the principal road to<br />

sustainable agriculture (FAO, 2014). Soil tillage and particularly the plough, in hilly regions<br />

<strong>of</strong> the world, has become part <strong>of</strong> the culture <strong>of</strong> crop production. Ploughing, cultivation and<br />

tillage are <strong>of</strong>ten synonyms for growing a crop. Although the concept <strong>of</strong> CA is universally<br />

applicable, this does not mean that the techniques and practices for hilly region are readily<br />

available (Sharma et al., 2014). Depending on the specific farming situation and agroecological<br />

conditions, the actual CA practice has to be developed locally. Especially, the crop<br />

rotations, selections <strong>of</strong> cover crops, issues <strong>of</strong> integration <strong>of</strong> crop and livestock have to be<br />

revealed and decided upon by the farmers in a given location. A diversity <strong>of</strong> problems arises,<br />

very <strong>of</strong>ten around weed management, residue management, equipment handling and settings,<br />

planting parameters like time and depth, which need to be addressed. Similarly, issues like<br />

steep slope, undulating topography and fragmented land holdings in hilly region are to be<br />

addressed which are major constraint in adopting CA. CA needs to be understood in a<br />

broader perspective in Himalayan states <strong>of</strong> India. It should be practiced in such a way that<br />

both soil and water conservation methods are mutually reinforced (Sharma et al., 2005).<br />

Although favourable results have been obtained with reduced tillage/no-tillage systems in<br />

many cases, there are some problems associated with them in adopting it to hilly region. One<br />

major problem in hilly regions is limited availability <strong>of</strong> crop residue and its utilization for<br />

feed and fuel. Reduced tillage systems <strong>of</strong> developed countries/Indo-Gangetic Plains (IGP)<br />

cannot be copied in toto without modification in India/hilly states especially in sloping<br />

agricultural conditions, albeit with caution and the prevailing soil, climatic, social, and<br />

economic conditions <strong>of</strong> the region must be considered (Jat et al., 2021). Therefore, the real<br />

challenge lies in finding ways and means <strong>of</strong> sparing the crop residue for conservation farming<br />

and evolving alternative strategies for meeting fodder requirements <strong>of</strong> livestock in the region.<br />

CA practices has to be adopted holistically so that it minimizes soil loss, conserve water and<br />

599 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

controls weeds, all <strong>of</strong> which are essential for sustainable and successful crop production<br />

under Himalayan states <strong>of</strong> India.<br />

References<br />

FAO. 2014. What is conservation agriculture? http://www.fao.org/ag/ca/1a.html<br />

Jat R A, Jinger D, Kumar K, Singh R J, Jat S L, Dinesh D, Kumar A, and Sharma N K. 2021.<br />

Scaling-Up <strong>of</strong> Conservation Agriculture for Climate Change Resilient Agriculture in<br />

South Asia. pp. 351-380. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77935-1_11 In book: Wani<br />

S, Raju K V, and Bhattacharyya T. (Eds.), Scaling-up Solutions for Farmers. Springer<br />

Nature. ISBN 978-3-030-77934-4 ISBN 978-3-030-77935-1 (e<strong>Book</strong>)<br />

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77935-1<br />

Sharma A R, Singh R, and Dhyani S K. 2005. Conservation tillage and mulching for<br />

optimizing productivity in maize-wheat cropping system in the outer western Himalaya<br />

region – a review. Indian Journal <strong>of</strong> Soil Conservation 33(1): 35–41.<br />

Sharma N K, Ghosh B N, Mandal D, Singh R J, and Mishra P K. 2014. Conservation<br />

agriculture for resource conservation in North-Western Himalayan region. In:<br />

Somasundaram J, Choudhary R S, Subbarao A, Hati K M, Sinha N K, Vasanda-coumar<br />

M (eds) Conservation agriculture for carbon sequestration and sustaining soil health.<br />

New India Publishing Agency, New Delhi, pp 105–126.<br />

Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture<br />

T4a-16P- 1221<br />

Direct Seeding in Rice: A Resource Conservation Technology in Scarce<br />

Rainfall Zone <strong>of</strong> Kurnool district, A.P.<br />

M. Sudhakar, G. Dhanalakshmi, K.V. Ramanaiah and E. Ravi Goud<br />

Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Yagantipalli. Kurnool dist. A.P-518124<br />

Rice (Oryza sativa), the staple food <strong>of</strong> more than half <strong>of</strong> the population <strong>of</strong> the world, ia an<br />

important target to provide food security and livelihoods for millions. Imminent water crisis,<br />

water demanding nature <strong>of</strong> transplanted rice has deleterious effects on the Soil environment.<br />

Nearly 30% <strong>of</strong> total Water (1,400 – 1,800 mm) used in rice culture is consumed mainly<br />

during Puddling and increased labour cost for transplanting leads to search for alternative<br />

management method. Direct seeding in Rice overcomes the problem <strong>of</strong> labour requirement<br />

for rice nursery raising and transplanting operations. Direct seeding in Rice facilitates timely<br />

sowing <strong>of</strong> crop in Command areas and taking up succeeding crops leading to increase water<br />

productivity, system sustainability and pr<strong>of</strong>itability.<br />

Thirty on-farm demonstrations were conducted on Direct seeding in Rice in different<br />

locations <strong>of</strong> Banaganapalli, Serivella and Gosapadu mandals <strong>of</strong> Kurnool district during<br />

600 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

consecutive years <strong>of</strong> 2017-18,2018-19 and 2019-20 under command area. Rice crop was<br />

sown immediately after receipt <strong>of</strong> monsoons at optimum soil moisture with pre-emergence<br />

application <strong>of</strong> pendimethalin @ 2.5 lit /ha was taken up in all demonstrations. The results <strong>of</strong><br />

the demonstrations revealed that the mean grain yield <strong>of</strong> direct seeded rice was 7453 kg/ ha,<br />

while transplanting method was 7125 kg/ha. Net returns with direct seeded rice was Rs<br />

79154/ha compared to transplanting method <strong>of</strong> Rs 56700/ha. The increased net returns in<br />

direct seeded rice due to less cost <strong>of</strong> cultivation.<br />

Direct seeded rice has been believed to be an optimal option for rice production. This shift<br />

would sustainably reduce crop water requirement and emission <strong>of</strong> green house gases. In<br />

transplanted rice with Puddling and transplanting is one <strong>of</strong> the major sources <strong>of</strong> methane<br />

emissions. More over, direct seeded rice uses 15-20 per cent less water than transplanted<br />

flooded rice and reduces methane emission by 18% percent. The reduced emission <strong>of</strong> these<br />

gases helps in climate change adaptation and mitigation, organic matter turnovers, Carbon<br />

sequestration and also provides opportunity for crop intensification.<br />

T4a-17P-1467<br />

Effect <strong>of</strong> Bio Regulators Along with Organics on Growth and Yield <strong>of</strong><br />

Gundumalli (Jasminum sambac Ait.)<br />

V. Velmurugan, R. Sendhilnathan, M. Punithavathi, V. Sangeetha,<br />

V.E. Nethaji Mariappan and P. Dominic Manoj<br />

ICAR – Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Hans Roever Campus, Perambalur District, Tamil Nadu - 621115<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Horticulture, Annamalai University, Annamalainagar-608002. T.N. India<br />

kvk.perambalur@icar.gov.in, kvkroever@gmail.com<br />

Effect <strong>of</strong> bio regulators along with organics on growth and yield <strong>of</strong> Gundumalli<br />

(Jasminumsambac Ait.) was taken up in a floriculture unit, Annamalai University at<br />

Annamalainagar during 2011-2013.The experiment was conducted by using different organic<br />

manures viz., FYM, vermicompost and whereas bioregulators like Naphthalene acidic acid,<br />

Gibberllic acid and panchagavya was given as foliar application. The experiment was laid out<br />

in Randomized Block Design with 10 treatment combinations in three replications. The<br />

growth parameters viz., plant height, number <strong>of</strong> primary shoots, number <strong>of</strong> secondary shoots,<br />

number <strong>of</strong> leaves per plant, leaf area, number <strong>of</strong> productive shoots and chlorophyll content<br />

registered the highest when application <strong>of</strong> vermicompost @ 2.5 t ha -1 along with foliar spray<br />

panchagavya 3 percent. The flowering and flower bud characters, viz., early commencement<br />

<strong>of</strong> flowering, length <strong>of</strong> flower bud, flower bud diameter, corolla tube length, bud length<br />

without corolla and flower yield characteristics viz., hundred bud weight, flower yield per<br />

plant, flower yield per hectare and the quality character like shelf life also registered the<br />

highest in the treatment combination <strong>of</strong> vermicompost @ 2.5 t ha -1 along with foliar spray<br />

601 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

panchagavya 3 per cent. The nutrient contents (NPK) <strong>of</strong> the plant tissues also registered the<br />

highest when vermicompost @ 2.5 t ha -1 along with foliar spray panchagavya 3 per cent was<br />

applied. With regard to the postharvest available soil nutrients, the results revealed that<br />

application <strong>of</strong> vermicompost @ 2.5 t ha -1 along with foliar spray panchagavya 3 per cent<br />

recorded the highest organic content in soil. Hence it could be concluded that the treatment<br />

combination <strong>of</strong> vermicompost @ 2.5 t ha -1 along with foliar spray panchagavya 3 per cent is<br />

best suited to grow Gundumalli (JasminumsambacAit.) in field condition to achieve good<br />

growth, pr<strong>of</strong>use flowering and flower yield.<br />

T4a-18P- 1226<br />

Effect <strong>of</strong> Life Saving Irrigation on Yield and Economics <strong>of</strong> Different Kharif<br />

and Rabi Crops under Dryland Conditions<br />

<br />

K. Tiwari*, S. M. Kurmvanshi, Abhishek Soni, G. D. Sharma, S. Pandey and<br />

<br />

S. S. Baghel<br />

All India coordinated Research Project on Dryland Agriculture, JNKVV, College <strong>of</strong> Agriculture,<br />

Rewa 486001 (M.P.)<br />

*rktkvkrewa@rediffmail.com<br />

In dryland area the distribution <strong>of</strong> rainfall is highly erratic and the occurrence <strong>of</strong> dry spells<br />

during the crop growth stages is indispensable resulting in failure <strong>of</strong> crop or realization <strong>of</strong><br />

uneconomical yield. Harvesting <strong>of</strong> rainwater through farm ponds during the rainy season and<br />

recycling it for use as supplemental irrigation at the critical stages <strong>of</strong> the crop can help to<br />

mitigate the effect <strong>of</strong> dry spells and to overcome the loss <strong>of</strong> yield under dryland condition for<br />

Rabi cropping after Kharif. Several researchers have shown that on farm in-situ run <strong>of</strong>f<br />

collection <strong>of</strong> rainwater in to farm ponds and its utilization in dry spells as supplemental<br />

irrigation can increase and stabilize the crop production (Krishna et al. 1987).<br />

Methodology<br />

This experiment was conducted 2017-18 to 2020-21 and pooled data has been presented for<br />

study purpose. The experimental soil is silty clay loam, medium in organic carbon and low in<br />

available nitrogen and Phosphorus while potassium status was medium. Water harvesting<br />

tank size is 60 m X 30 m. Total harvested water was 3867m 3 while 1850 m 3 water was used<br />

for irrigation. Water losses through seepage and evaporation was 1160 M 3 . During Kharif<br />

Soybean and Rice crops were grown under dryland condition while in Rabi wheat, chickpea,<br />

Mustard and coriander crops were taken which were given supplemental life saving irrigation<br />

from water harvested pond. All the crops were fertilized by recommended doses <strong>of</strong> fertilizers<br />

under dryland condition.<br />

Results<br />

Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture<br />

602 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

After perusal <strong>of</strong> the results, it is evident that impact <strong>of</strong> life saving irrigation was 16.16% in<br />

wheat, 27.40% in chickpea, 24.54% in mustard and 19.58% in coriander when these crops<br />

were grown after rice. Wheat, chickpea, mustard and corriander were grown after soybean<br />

also showed variation in yield under control and life saving irrigation conditions. Grain yield<br />

<strong>of</strong> wheat was increased by 18.32%, gram by 27.17%, mustard by 23.23% when grown after<br />

soybean. Yield <strong>of</strong> coriander was increased by 7.1% when grown after soybean under the<br />

influence <strong>of</strong> one life saving irrigation. Similar findings were also reported by Nagdeve, and<br />

Patode, (2012).<br />

Residual effect <strong>of</strong> soybean on grain yield <strong>of</strong> wheat, Chickpea, mustard and coriander was<br />

more when these crops were taken after soybean as compared to rice.<br />

Effect <strong>of</strong> life saving irrigation on grain yield <strong>of</strong> Kharif and Rabi crops.<br />

Crop Control Life saving irrigation<br />

Soybean 532 689<br />

Rice 1617 1730<br />

Cropping<br />

system<br />

Wheat Chickpea Mustard Coriander<br />

After rice Control 1448 551 383 143<br />

Life saving<br />

irrigation<br />

1682<br />

(16.16%)<br />

702<br />

(27.40%)<br />

477<br />

(24.54%)<br />

After soybean Control 1479 564 396 183<br />

Life saving 1750 717<br />

irrigation (18.32%) (27.12%)<br />

Figures in parentheses are % increases in yield over control<br />

488<br />

(23.23%)<br />

Effect <strong>of</strong> life saving irrigation on net pr<strong>of</strong>it <strong>of</strong> Kharif and Rabi crops<br />

Crop (Kharif) Control Life saving irrigation Mean<br />

Soybean 6370 10220 (60.43%) 8295<br />

Rice 9358 10162 (8.59%) 9760<br />

Mean 7864 10191<br />

171<br />

(19.58%)<br />

196<br />

(7.10%)<br />

Rabi Wheat Chickpea Mustard Coriander Mean<br />

After rice Control 1908 3868 5256 5466 4124.5<br />

After<br />

soybean<br />

LSI 3335<br />

(74.79%)<br />

11050<br />

(185.67%)<br />

6648<br />

(26.48%)<br />

10780<br />

(97.21%)<br />

7954.5<br />

Control 1003 5038 5655 7866 4890.5<br />

LSI 6088<br />

(506.97%)<br />

12464<br />

(147.39%)<br />

7489<br />

(32.43%)<br />

12280<br />

(56.11%)<br />

9580.5<br />

603 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Mean 3083.5 6511 6262 9098<br />

Figures in parentheses are % increase over control<br />

References<br />

Krishan, J. H., Arkin, G. F., and Wartin, J. R. 1987. Run <strong>of</strong> impoundment for supplemental<br />

irrigation in texas. Water Resource Bull. 23 (6):1057-1061.<br />

Nagdeve, M. B., and Patode, R. S. 2012. Protective irrigation through farm pond for<br />

enhancing crop productivity. Application technologies for harvested rainwater in farm<br />

ponds. In: proceeding <strong>of</strong> national consultation meeting held at CRIDA, Hyderabad. Pp:<br />

62-67.<br />

T4a-19P - 1205<br />

Effect <strong>of</strong> Long-Term Conservation Agriculture on Labile and Total Soil<br />

Organic Carbon Fractions <strong>of</strong> Rainfed Pearl Millet-Based Cropping<br />

Systems <strong>of</strong> India<br />

Amresh Chaudhary, M. C. Meena, S. P. Datta, A. Dey, R. S. Bana and D. M. Mahalla<br />

ICAR – Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi -12, India<br />

Conservation agriculture improves soil organic carbon concentration in surface soils but the<br />

increase in the SOC concentration are site-specific all over the world. The dynamics <strong>of</strong> SOC<br />

in CA is presented through assessment <strong>of</strong> management-induced changes in different fractions<br />

<strong>of</strong> SOC. Recent researches on SOC are focused on the quality <strong>of</strong> SOC, and its fractions are<br />

used as indicators <strong>of</strong> soil quality. The labile fractions include cold water extractable organic<br />

carbon (CWEOC); hot-water extractable organic carbon (HWEOC) and active carbon (AC).<br />

These fractions have small turnover time ranging from days to years. The non-labile fractions<br />

are chemically less active and are mainly responsible soil carbon sequestration. Yet, the<br />

information regarding SOC dynamics <strong>of</strong> labile and total organic carbon fractions are not<br />

sufficiently available under rainfed conservation agriculture. Therefore, we hypothesized that<br />

adoption <strong>of</strong> different tillage, residue management and cropping systems under rainfed pearl<br />

millet cropping systems have varied response for labile as well total soil organic carbon.<br />

Methodology<br />

A field experiment was initiated during rainy season <strong>of</strong> 2012–13 in the Research Farm <strong>of</strong><br />

ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi. Geographically, Delhi is situated<br />

between latitude <strong>of</strong> 28°37 and 28°39 N and longitude <strong>of</strong> 77°9 and 77°11 E at an altitude <strong>of</strong><br />

225.7 meter above mean sea level. It has semi-arid, sub-humid and subtropical climate with<br />

hot dry summer and severe cold winter. The Experimental plot consists <strong>of</strong> four tillage<br />

practices (Zero-Tillage with residues – ZTR, Zero-Tillage without residues – ZT-(R);<br />

Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture<br />

604 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

conventional Tillage – CT) and fallow fields which is not tilled and grass cover is maintained<br />

throughout the year. three cropping systems (Pearl millet- chickpea – PM-C, Pearl Millet-<br />

Chickpea- Fodder Pearl Millet – PM-C-FPM and Pearl Millet-Chickpea- Mung bean- PM-C-<br />

M) in split plot design. After eight years <strong>of</strong> completion <strong>of</strong> cropping cycle, fresh and moist soil<br />

samples are taken from 0-5, 5-15 and 15-30 cm <strong>of</strong> soil depth from each treatment and<br />

analysed for different labile pools <strong>of</strong> SOC including cold water extractable organic carbon<br />

(CWEOC); hot-water extractable organic carbon (HWEOC); Active carbon (AC) and total<br />

SOC. CWEOC is quantitatively very close to dissolved organic carbon whereas the HWEOC<br />

consists <strong>of</strong> more stable components that form the close reserve <strong>of</strong> nutrients and energy for<br />

plants and microorganisms. Similarly, AC determined through 0.002 M potassium<br />

permanganate is an active SOC pool and is well suited to track management practices that<br />

promote soil C sequestration, making it a particularly useful indicator for soil quality<br />

research. (Weil et al., 2003). The Total soil organic carbon was analysed through CHNS<br />

analyzer. Data were statistically analyzed by one-way analysis <strong>of</strong> variance (ANOVA) using<br />

doebioresearch package in R s<strong>of</strong>tware (R Core Team (2022).<br />

Results<br />

CWEOC was the highest in the surface than in the sub-soil layers under every tillage and<br />

cropping system treatments. CWEOC was similar for ZT+R, fallow and CT tillage practices<br />

and these were higher compared to ZT-R treatment at 0-5 cm depth whereas at 5-15 cm depth<br />

only ZT+R is significantly higher than other treatments. All the treatments remain nonsignificant<br />

at 15-30 cm soil depth. There was no significant difference between cropping<br />

systems throughout the soil depths. The interaction between tillage and cropping systems<br />

were significant at 0-5 and 5-15 cm <strong>of</strong> soil depth. The highest CWEOC were observed in<br />

ZT+R: PM-C-M (0.098 g kg -1 ) and ZT+R:PM-C-FPM (0.105 g kg -1 ) respectively at 0-5 cm<br />

depth. Similarly, ZT+R: PM-C-M (0.10 g kg -1 ) and ZT+R:PM-C-FPM (0.10 g kg -1 )<br />

treatments observed highest CWEOC at 5-15 cm soil depth and at 15-30 cm <strong>of</strong> soil depth<br />

CWEOC ranges between 0.098 to 0.067 g kg -1 . The concentration <strong>of</strong> HWEOC was almost 2.8<br />

times higher as compared to CWEOC at 0-5 cm depth. HWEOC also higher at surface (0-5<br />

cm) than subsurface soil depths (5-15 and 15-30 cm). HWEOC content was highest in ZT+R<br />

and fallow treatments as compared to ZT-R and CT treatments at 0-5 cm soil depths.<br />

HWEOC was 3.28 times higher as compared to CWEOC at 5-15 cm soil depth. HWEOC was<br />

highest in fallow (0.164 g kg -1 ) and CT (0.174 g kg -1 ) treatments as compared to ZT-R<br />

treatments (0.121 g kg -1 ) whereas at 15-30 cm, treatments follow the trend: fallow> ZT+R =<br />

CT> ZT-R. AC follow similar trend <strong>of</strong> HWEOC and CWEOC. AC was highest in ZT+R and<br />

ZT-R treatments as compared to CT and fallow treatments at 0-5 cm soil depth but there was<br />

no significant difference among tillage practices at 5-15and 15-30 cm <strong>of</strong> soil depth. The<br />

highest AC content was observed in PM-C-M (0.509 g kg -1 ) and PM-C-FPM (0.475 g kg -1 ) at<br />

0-5 cm soil depth. The interaction <strong>of</strong> tillage and cropping systems were significant at 0-5 and<br />

605 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

5-15 cm soil depth (Table). The TOC content was highest in ZT+R (8.487 g kg -1 ) which is<br />

83.82 % higher than CT (4.617 g kg -1 ) whereas fallow has highest total SOC content in 5-15<br />

and 15-30 cm respectively.<br />

Conclusion<br />

From this study, it can be concluded that labile pools <strong>of</strong> soil organic carbon such as CWEOC,<br />

HWEOC and AC as well as total SOC content are sensitive to changes in tillage as well<br />

cropping systems under different soil depths in rainfed pearl millet-based cropping systems.<br />

The adoption conservation tillage with residue retention on soil surface and crop rotation with<br />

legumes improves soil organic carbon content and quality as compared to conventional tillage<br />

systems.<br />

Depth distribution <strong>of</strong> labile soil organic carbon fractions<br />

Treatment/depth CWEOC (g kg -1 ) HWEOC (g kg -1 ) AC (g kg -1 )<br />

Tillage<br />

0-5 cm<br />

5-15<br />

cm<br />

15-30<br />

cm<br />

0-5<br />

cm<br />

5-15<br />

cm<br />

15-30<br />

cm<br />

0-5 cm<br />

5-15<br />

cm<br />

15-30<br />

cm<br />

ZT+R 0.097 a 0.088 a 0.077 0.287 a 0.154 b 0.111 b 0.527 a 0.435 0.226<br />

ZT-R 0.062 b 0.037 b 0.078 0.191 b 0.121 c 0.0945 c 0.474 ab 0.456 0.224<br />

CT 0.093 a 0.030 b 0.084 0.179 b 0.174 a 0.111 b 0.443 bc 0.389 0.233<br />

Fallow 0.0794 ab 0.032 b 0.068 0.277 a 0.164 ab 0.132 a 0.367 c 0.305 0.181<br />

Cropping systems<br />

PM-C-M 0.083 0.059 a 0.087 0.218 b 0.153 ab 0.108 b 0.509 a 0.432 0.225<br />

PM-C-<br />

FPM 0.087 0.039 b 0.075 0.220 b 0.137 b 0.115 b 0.475 ab 0.421 0.217<br />

PM-C 0.0818 0.055 a 0.077 0.217 b 0.160 a 0.093 c 0.462 b 0.427 0.242<br />

fallow 0.0794 0.032 b 0.068 0.277 a 0.164 a 0.132 a 0.367 c 0.305 0.181<br />

References<br />

R Core Team. 2022. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation<br />

for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL https://www.R-project.org/.<br />

Weil, R.R., Islam, K.R., Stine, M.A., Gruver, J.B. and Samson-Liebig, S.E. 2003. Estimating<br />

active carbon for soil quality assessment: A simplified method for laboratory and field<br />

use. American J. Alternative Agric., 18(1): 3-17.<br />

Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture<br />

606 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

T4a-20P-1324<br />

Effect <strong>of</strong> Organic and Inorganic Nutrient Management Practices on<br />

Growth and Yield <strong>of</strong> Maize under Sub-Tropical Kandi area Jammu region<br />

Brinder Singh 1* , A.P. Singh 1 , G. Ravindra Chary 2 , Gopinath 2 , Jai Kumar 1 , Rohit<br />

Sharma 1 , A. P. Rai 1 and Sunny Raina 1<br />

1 All India Coordinated Project for Dryland agriculture, Rakh-Dhiansar, Samba (UT <strong>of</strong> J&K)<br />

2 ICAR-Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, Hyderabad<br />

Sher-e-Kashmir University <strong>of</strong> Agricultural Sciences and Technology <strong>of</strong> Jammu, Jammu and Kashmir<br />

(UT) 181 133<br />

*brinder24@gmail.com<br />

Maize is globally the top-ranking cereal in potential grain productivity. It is cultivated in subtropical<br />

regions <strong>of</strong> the world. Maize (Zea Mays L.) is the third most important food grains<br />

crop in India after rice and wheat. In India maize produced 31.51 million tonnes in an area <strong>of</strong><br />

9.9 million hectares during 2020-21, (Acharya et al. 2021). In Jammu and Kashmir maizewheat<br />

is the most prevalent cropping sequence being practiced by farming community in the<br />

kandi belt <strong>of</strong> Jammu Division (under rainfed conditions). About 12% <strong>of</strong> the total area <strong>of</strong><br />

Jammu region constituting dry semi-hilly belt is rainfed in nature, the most stressed<br />

ecosystem <strong>of</strong> this region and is locally known as kandi area. Continues use <strong>of</strong> chemical<br />

fertilizers resulted in decline <strong>of</strong> soil physical and chemical properties and crop yield and<br />

significant land problems, such as soil degradation due to over exploitation <strong>of</strong> land and soil<br />

pollution caused by high application rates <strong>of</strong> fertilizers and pesticide application. Application<br />

<strong>of</strong> Effect <strong>of</strong> organic sources <strong>of</strong> nutrient on yield and soil properties <strong>of</strong> Soybeans besides<br />

supplying N, P and K also make unavailable sources <strong>of</strong> elemental nitrogen, bound<br />

phosphates, micronutrients, and decomposed plant residues into an available form to facilitate<br />

to plant to absorb the nutrients. Application <strong>of</strong> organic sources <strong>of</strong> nutrients viz FYM and<br />

Crop residue has capability to improve soil quality and higher crop productivity in<br />

sustainable manner without deteriorating the soil and other natural resources. Keeping the<br />

above facts into consideration, the problem entitled “Effect <strong>of</strong> organic and inorganic nutrient<br />

management practices on growth and yield <strong>of</strong> maize under sub-tropical kandi area Jammu<br />

region” is proposed to identify the best type <strong>of</strong> available organic resources which can be used<br />

as fertilizers and their best combination with appropriate proportion <strong>of</strong> inorganic fertilizers.<br />

Methodology<br />

A field experiment was conducted under rainfed condition during kharif season <strong>of</strong> 2019 -<br />

2020 at Research farm <strong>of</strong> Advanced Centre for Rainfed Agriculture Rakh-Dhiansar <strong>of</strong><br />

SKUAST-Jammu (32° 39” N 74° 53” E 332 m amsl), under rainfed condition. The soil <strong>of</strong><br />

experimental site was sandy loam in texture, with a pH 6.5, low in organic carbon (0.18), and<br />

607 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

available nitrogen (178 kg/ha), and medium available phosphorus (18 kg/ha) and potassium<br />

(108 kg/ha). The experiment consisted <strong>of</strong> ten treatments <strong>of</strong> inorganic and organic<br />

combinations <strong>of</strong> nutrient sources, viz T 1: Control; T 2: 100 % recommended fertilizer dose-<br />

RFD (60:40:20 NPK kg/ha); T3: 50 % RFD NPK; T4: 50 % N (crop residue); T5: 50 % N<br />

(FYM); T 6: 50 % RFD + 50 % N (crop residues); T 7: 50 % RFD + 50 % N (FYM); T 8: FYM<br />

10 t/ha; T9: 100 % RFD + ZnSO4 20 kg/ha and T10: Farmers practice (FYM 4 t/ha + urea 40<br />

kg/ha). Maize (var Mansar) was shown in the month <strong>of</strong> June- July and harvested in<br />

September-October during kharif seasons <strong>of</strong> 2019 to 2020, respectively. The crops were sown<br />

in lines with a spacing <strong>of</strong> 60 cm x 20 cm, respectively.<br />

Results<br />

Among the different organic and inorganic treatments, the maximum plant height (215 cm)<br />

was recorded with application <strong>of</strong> 50 % recommended NPK + 50% N (FYM) which was<br />

found to be statistically at par with the treatment where application <strong>of</strong> 50 % recommended<br />

NPK + 50% N (Crop residues) was applied during the experimentation. The improved growth<br />

in plant might be due to increased cell division and photosynthetc efficency because <strong>of</strong><br />

enhanced availabilty <strong>of</strong> nutrients. (Tomar et al., 2017). With regard to yield and yield<br />

attributes, the treatment where application <strong>of</strong> 50 % recommended NPK + 50% N (FYM) was<br />

applied recorded significantly highest grain (22.33 q ha -1 ) and stover (46.26 q ha -1 ) yield <strong>of</strong><br />

maize which was statistically at par with the treatment 50 % recommended NPK + 50% N<br />

(Crop residue) while the lowest yield was recorded in control plots. Likewise, the highest net<br />

returns to the tune <strong>of</strong> ₹ 24716 ha -1 was realized with the application <strong>of</strong> application <strong>of</strong> 50 %<br />

recommended NPK + 50% N (FYM) with B:C ratio <strong>of</strong> 2.01. Similar results were observed by<br />

Gupta,et.al( 2014). The increase in yield with addition <strong>of</strong> FYM alone or in combination <strong>of</strong><br />

inorganic fertilizers may be attributed to the fact that FYM being the store house <strong>of</strong> nutrients<br />

also made release <strong>of</strong> applied nutrients at its optimum at the same time improved the soil<br />

physical conditions (Kumar et al. 2002).<br />

Treatment<br />

Effect <strong>of</strong> organic and inorganic nutrients on growth yield and economics <strong>of</strong><br />

maize under rainfed conditions (pooled data <strong>of</strong> two years)<br />

Plant<br />

height<br />

(cm)<br />

Grain<br />

yield<br />

(q ha -1 )<br />

Straw<br />

yield<br />

(q ha -1 )<br />

Net<br />

returns<br />

(₹ ha -1 )<br />

Control 171 7.55 18.00 853 0.95<br />

100 % recommended NPK 195 17.29 36.68 16881 1.79<br />

50 % recommended NPK 184 12.09 26.56 7138 1.36<br />

50 % recommended N (Crop residue) 187 13.25 28.62 7859 1.37<br />

50 % recommended N (FYM) 187 14.04 29.97 8658 1.39<br />

50 % recommended NPK + 50% N (Crop 205 20.63 42.51 21496 1.90<br />

B.C<br />

Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture<br />

608 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

residue)<br />

50 % recommended NPK + 50% N<br />

(FYM) 215 22.33 46.26 24716 2.01<br />

FYM @ 10 t/ha 189 18.98 39.67 15986 1.62<br />

100 % recommended NPK + ZnSO 4 @<br />

20 kg/ha 200 19.53 40.47 21367 1.99<br />

Farmer’s method (FYM @ 4 t/ha + 40 kg<br />

Urea/ha) 194 15.39 33.23 12193 1.56<br />

Mean 193 16.11 34.19 8090 0.85<br />

CD=(P=0.05) 11.81 3.12 5.69<br />

Conclusion<br />

It can be safely concluded from the above observations that application <strong>of</strong> 50 %<br />

recommended NPK through chemical fertilizer in combination with application <strong>of</strong> 50% N<br />

through FYM resulted in higher plant height, yield and yield attributes <strong>of</strong> maize under<br />

subtropical conditions <strong>of</strong> Jammu.<br />

References<br />

Gupta V, Sharma A, Kumar J, Abrol V, Singh B and Singh M. 2014. Integrated nutrient<br />

management in maize-gobhi sarson cropping system in low altitude sub-tropical<br />

region in foothills. Bangladesh Journal <strong>of</strong> Botany. 43(2): 147-155.<br />

Kumar A, Thakur KS and Manuja S. 2002. Effect <strong>of</strong> fertilizer levels on promising hybrid<br />

maize (Zea mays) under rainfed conditions <strong>of</strong> HP. Indian Journal <strong>of</strong> Agronomy. 47:<br />

526-528.<br />

Tomar S. S, Singh A, Dwivedi A, Sharma R, Naresh R. K, Kumar, Tyagi, S, Singh A, Yadav<br />

S, Rahul N, and Singh, B. P. 2017. Effect <strong>of</strong> integrated nutrient management for<br />

sustainable production system <strong>of</strong> maize (Zea Maya L.) in Indo-Gangetic plain zone<br />

<strong>of</strong> India. International Journal <strong>of</strong> Chemical studies. 5(2): 310-316.<br />

Singh, R.B. 2000. Environmental consequences <strong>of</strong> agricultural development: a case study<br />

from the green revolution state <strong>of</strong> Haryana, India, Agric., Ecosystem and Envir. 82,<br />

1-3, pp. 97-103.<br />

Acharya N. G. Ranga. 2021 Agricultural University is a public agricultural university with its<br />

headquarters at the village Lam, Guntur district, Andhra Pradesh, India.<br />

Wikipediahttps://angrau.ac.in/downloads/AMIC/OutlookReports/2021/7-<br />

MAIZE_Jianuary%20to%20December%202021.pdf.<br />

609 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

T4a-21P<br />

Effect <strong>of</strong> Organic Sources <strong>of</strong> Nutrients on Yield and Soil Properties <strong>of</strong><br />

Soybean<br />

S. A. Jawale, P. H. Gourkhede, D. G. Shinde and A. K. Gore<br />

Organic Farming Research and Training Centre, Vasantrao Naik Marathwada Krishi Vidyapeeth,<br />

Parbhani - 431402 (Maharashtra) India<br />

<strong>of</strong>rtcvnmkvparbhani@gmail.com<br />

Organic manures are a valuable potential source <strong>of</strong> N and organic matter. They play an<br />

important role in the improvement <strong>of</strong> the physical, chemical, and biological properties <strong>of</strong> soil<br />

with an increase in the microbial population in the soil. Hence, a field study to know the<br />

effect <strong>of</strong> conjoint use <strong>of</strong> organic manure on yield and nutrient status <strong>of</strong> soybean in Inceptisol<br />

was conducted during kharif 2021-22, on the Research field <strong>of</strong> Organic Farming Research<br />

and Training Centre, Vasantrao Naik Marathwada Krishi Vidyapeeth, Parbhani. Revealed the<br />

effect <strong>of</strong> organic sources <strong>of</strong> nutrients on the yield and soil properties <strong>of</strong> soybeans. Among<br />

various treatments, the higher concentration <strong>of</strong> available nitrogen, phosphorous & potassium<br />

was found in RDF + FYM 5 t /ha (T 13) followed by 33% FYM + 33% VC + 33% NC (T 3) as<br />

an organic source <strong>of</strong> nutrients.<br />

Methodology<br />

An experiment was conducted at Organic Farming Research and Training Centre, Vasantrao<br />

Naik Marathwada Krishi Vidyapeeth Parbhani, during Kharif 2018-19. The experiment<br />

design was RBD for thirteen treatments with three replications with a gross plot size <strong>of</strong> 7.2 m<br />

x 6.0 m and net plot size <strong>of</strong> 6.3 m x 5.4 m and with 45 x 05 cm spacing.<br />

Results<br />

Soybean yield was determined by the development <strong>of</strong> the plant from the beginning <strong>of</strong><br />

sowing to the harvest period, where the role <strong>of</strong> fertilization was <strong>of</strong> great importance. The<br />

application <strong>of</strong> different organic and chemical fertilizers would affect one or all <strong>of</strong> its yield<br />

components. Data from Table showed that among nutrient source applications the chemical<br />

fertilizer as RDF with FYM the treatment T13 i.e. RDF + FYM @ 5 t ha -1 recorded the<br />

highest available macronutrient in soil which was found significantly superior over the rest<br />

<strong>of</strong> the treatments. However, the use <strong>of</strong> organic sources <strong>of</strong> nutrients affected soybean<br />

available macronutrients in soil, and data revealed that the effect <strong>of</strong> various organic sources<br />

on soybean yield was found to be significant. The nutrient status for available<br />

macronutrients was found to be significant for available nitrogen. Among various<br />

treatments higher concentration <strong>of</strong> available nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium was found<br />

in T3 followed by T2 <strong>of</strong> an organic source <strong>of</strong> the nutrient. The differences for pH, EC,<br />

Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture<br />

610 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

organic carbon, and CaCO3 were found to be non-significant. Whereas numerically higher<br />

values for pH were observed in T 10 and higher values <strong>of</strong> EC and organic carbon were<br />

observed in T 3. The differences in micronutrients were found to be significant. Among<br />

various treatments, T3 showed a higher concentration <strong>of</strong> all micronutrients. Among various<br />

organic sources <strong>of</strong> nutrients the treatment i.e. T 3: 100 % RDN through 33% FYM + 33%<br />

VC + 33% NC available macronutrient in soil N, P, and K . (218, 21.52 and 516 kg/ha). The<br />

treatments had RWUE <strong>of</strong> more than one except the control plots and it was found highest in<br />

treatment T 13 followed by T 2. The positive effects <strong>of</strong> organic manure application on the<br />

performance <strong>of</strong> soybean and other crops in black soils are well documented by Aher et al.<br />

2015. The differences for pH, EC, organic carbon, and CaCO 3 were found to be nonsignificant.<br />

Whereas numerically higher values for pH were observed in T10 and higher<br />

values <strong>of</strong> EC and organic carbon were observed in T 3.<br />

Conclusion<br />

Among various organic sources <strong>of</strong> nutrient treatments, application <strong>of</strong> 100 % RDN through<br />

33% FYM + 33% VC + 33% NC (T3) recorded the highest available nutrients in soil N, P,<br />

and K (218, 21.52 and 516 kg/ha). Potassium was found in RDF + FYM 5 t /ha (T 13) followed<br />

by 33% FYM + 33% VC + 33% NC (T3) as a organic source <strong>of</strong> nutrients.<br />

References<br />

Aher, S.B., Lakaria, B.L., Swami, K., Singh, A.B., Ramana, S., Ramesh, K. and Thakur, J. K.<br />

2015. Effect <strong>of</strong> organic farming practices on soil and performance <strong>of</strong> soybean<br />

(Glycine max (L.)) under semiarid tropical conditions in central India. Journal <strong>of</strong><br />

Applied and Natural Science 7(1): 67–71.<br />

611 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA,<br />

Hyderabad<br />

Treatments<br />

Soil nutrient status under different organic nutrient sources after harvest <strong>of</strong> Soybean<br />

pH<br />

EC<br />

dS m -1<br />

OC<br />

%<br />

CaCO 3<br />

%<br />

Available Major<br />

nutrients<br />

kg/ ha.<br />

Micronutrients<br />

ppm<br />

N P K Cu Fe Mn Zn<br />

T 1: 100 % RDN through FYM 7.59 0.42 0.61 3.5 197 20.19 486 12.09 14.29 17.58 0.26<br />

T 2: 100 % RDN through VC 7.61 0.29 0.64 3.6 206 21.48 486 12.43 15.61 18.26 0.46<br />

T 3: 100 % RDN through 33% FYM + 33% VC +<br />

33% NC<br />

7.59 0.46 0.68 2.8 218 21.52 506 12.68 16.84 20.06 0.45<br />

T 4: 100 % RDN: FYM + JA 3 at 30, 45 & 60 DAS 7.63 0.41 0.56 3.4 187 19.46 496 12.19 15.26 18.34 0.31<br />

T 5: 75 % RDN: FYM + JA 3 at 30, 45 & 60 DAS 7.49 0.43 0.62 2.6 164 17.26 486 8.56 13.64 17.54 0.39<br />

T 6: 50 % RDN: FYM + JA 3 at 30, 45 & 60 DAS 7.58 0.41 0.61 3.9 153 18.72 463 11.89 13.26 16.46 0.37<br />

T 7: 100 % RDN: FYM + Bi<strong>of</strong>ertilizer 2.5 lit/ha (SA) 7.64 0.34 0.48 3.5 163 18.63 416 12.67 14.27 17.58 0.36<br />

T 8: 75 % RDN: FYM + Bi<strong>of</strong>ertilizer 2.5 lit/ha (SA) 7.52 0.38 0.54 2.9 149 17.43 427 10.26 13.69 15.69 0.31<br />

T 9: 50 % RDN: FYM + Bi<strong>of</strong>ertilizer 2.5 lit/ha (SA) 7.48 0.39 0.51 3.7 138 16.59 416 11.31 11.67 16.87 0.38<br />

T 10: Jivamrut 3 Appln at 30, 45 & 60 DAS 8.12 0.41 0.61 3.4 114 15.67 421 10.94 11.43 15.64 0.28<br />

T 11: Jivamrut 5 Appln at 0, 15, 30, 45 & 60 DAS 7.83 0.39 0.53 3.6 116 15.27 406 10.54 11.58 14.69 0.33<br />

T 12: Control (Without any application) 7.64 0.41 0.54 3.1 94 13.28 389 9.38 10.64 15.87 0.34<br />

T 13: RDF + 5 t FYM/ha 7.59 0.38 0.58 3.5 234 22.68 529 12.67 13.69 16.98 0.29<br />

SE + 0.024 0.004 0.018 0.006 4.68 0.67 4.81 0.003 0.28 0.39 0.0048<br />

CD at 5% NS NS NS NS 1.56 0.223 1.603 0.002 0.093 0.12 0.113<br />

Mean 7.64 0.39 0.58 3.35 164 18.32 455 11.35 13.53 17.04 0.35<br />

ffff<br />

612 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

T4a-22P- 1460<br />

Effect <strong>of</strong> Paddy Straw mulching and Tillage on Growth and Yield <strong>of</strong> Pea<br />

(Pisum sativum L.)<br />

V. Akashe Zhimomi, Bendangjungla and Peiwang<br />

A field experiment was conducted during the rabi season 2021-22 at farmers field, NICRA<br />

village, Mon district, Nagaland to study the effect <strong>of</strong> paddy straw mulching and tillage on growth<br />

and yield <strong>of</strong> field pea (Pisum sativum L.). Aman, is a new pea variety introduced for the district<br />

and has become a staple crop. The crop is generally sown during the last week <strong>of</strong> October after<br />

the harvest <strong>of</strong> wet rice cultivation (WRC). The result showed that maximum plant height, no. <strong>of</strong><br />

branches per plant, no. <strong>of</strong> pods per plant, no. <strong>of</strong> seeds per pod, test weight and soil moisture<br />

content were obtained from paddy straw mulch with minimum tillage. The highest net income<br />

and benefit cost ratio was obtained from paddy straw mulch with minimum tillage.<br />

T4a-23P- 1102<br />

Effect <strong>of</strong> Tillage and Residue Management on Yield <strong>of</strong> Blackgram – Rabi<br />

Sorghum Sequence Grown on Inceptisol under Rainfed Condition<br />

N. J. Ranshur, S. K. Upadhye and V. M. Amrutsagar<br />

All India Coordinated Research Project on Dryland Agriculture, Solapur Maharashtra. 413 002<br />

An experiment was conducted at Dry Farming Research Station, Zonal Agricultural Research<br />

Station, Mulegaon farm Solapur during year 2020-21 to study the effect <strong>of</strong> tillage and residue<br />

management on yield <strong>of</strong> blackgram – rabi sorghum sequence grown on Inceptisol under rainfed<br />

condition. The main tillage management treatments were i) Conventional tillage (CT) ii)<br />

Reduced tillage (RT) and iii) Zero tillage (ZT) with different residue management sub treatments<br />

viz. S1= Kharif fallow (No retention <strong>of</strong> crop residue) + RDF (50 :25: 25 kg/ha N:P2O5:K2O) for<br />

rabi sorghum, S2 = Harvest <strong>of</strong> black gram above ground level at flowering stage for surface<br />

cover as a green lopping’s (root + crop residue)+ 0:50 Kg/ha N: P2O5 + PSB + Rhizobium seed<br />

treatment to black gram and 37.5:0:25 Kg/ha N : P2O5 : K2O + Acetobacter + PSB seed<br />

treatment for rabi sorghum and S3= Harvesting <strong>of</strong> black gram above ground level for grain<br />

(Root biomass retained in soil) + 19:37.5 Kg/ha N:P2O5 to black gram + PSB + Rhizobium seed<br />

treatment and 37.5:19:25 Kg/ha N:P2O5:K2O to rabi sorghum + PSB + Acetobacter seed<br />

treatment.<br />

613 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

At the end <strong>of</strong> 8 th year <strong>of</strong> experimentation, the observations were recorded for green biomass and<br />

dry matter yield <strong>of</strong> black gram at flowering for green manuring. The conventional tillage (CT)<br />

recorded highest mean green biomass yield (39.54 q ha -1 ) and dry matter yield (9.56 q ha -1 )<br />

followed by reduced tillage (38.13 and 7.85 q ha -1 ) and zero tillage (29.70 and 6.76 q ha -1 )<br />

treatments. The rabi sorghum recorded significantly highest grain (15.18 q ha -1 ) and stover<br />

(37.98 q ha -1 ) yields in reduced tillage main treatment (S2) followed by conventional tillage<br />

(15.08) and zero tillage (14.76). However, the treatment differences were non-significant. The<br />

highest returns, B:C ratio and relative water use efficiency (RWUE) were Rs. 60322/ha, 2.59 and<br />

4.12 kg ha -1 mm -1 respectively in rabi sorghum.<br />

In residue management sub-treatment, the grain (16.59 q/ha) and straw yield (41.04 q/ha) <strong>of</strong> rabi<br />

sorghum was recorded highest in black gram –green manuring (S2) treatments followed by kharif<br />

fallow (S1) and black gram grain (S3) treatment. The rabi sorghum recorded significantly highest<br />

net monetary returns, B:C ratio and relative water use efficiency (RWUE) Rs. 69385/ha, 2.83<br />

and 3.67 kg ha -1 mm -1 respectively in black gram –green manuring (S2) treatments followed by<br />

kharif fallow (S1) and black gram grain (S3) treatment.<br />

T4a-24P- 1338<br />

Effect <strong>of</strong> Tillage Practices and Mulching on Rabi Sorghum Crop under Rainfed Condition<br />

K. Arun Kumar*, T. Bagavata Priya, S. Isha Parveen, D. Lakshmi kalyani, R.<br />

Narasimhulu, Y. S. Sathish Kumar and H Manjunath<br />

Regional Agricultural Research Station, Acharya N. G. Ranga Agricultural University,<br />

Nandyal-518502<br />

*k. arunkumar@angrau.ac.in<br />

Soil water availability in water-limited ecosystems has been recognized as a key factor<br />

influencing plant production. The present situation in India demands conservation <strong>of</strong> every drop<br />

<strong>of</strong> water on land surface to increase biomass production to support livelihood. Suitable tillage<br />

practices that reduces cost <strong>of</strong> cultivation; increases income, reduces hazardous effects and<br />

increases water use efficiency <strong>of</strong> sorghum need to be adopted for conservation <strong>of</strong> rainwater, top<br />

fertile soil and nutrients that stabilizes and/or improves the food production in the region. At<br />

present conditions, both primary and secondary tillage operations are being carried-out which not<br />

only increases cost <strong>of</strong> cultivation but also induces soil and water losses. By avoiding these<br />

problems, rotary strip tillage has been introduced which gave the best crop residue management<br />

by decomposing the leftover crop residues in the field and turn in increase the organic matter<br />

content which intern increases water holding capacity <strong>of</strong> the soil.<br />

614 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Methodology<br />

The experiment was conducted during the Rabi season <strong>of</strong> 2020-2021 and 2021-2022 at Regional<br />

Agricultural Research Station. This centre is located Scarce Rainfall zone at 15.47 N latitude and<br />

78.48 E longitude. The experiment was conducted in an area <strong>of</strong> 90 m 2 plot size with 45 cm × 15<br />

cm spacing and fertilizer application <strong>of</strong> 80-60-40 NPK kg/ha. The treatments consisted <strong>of</strong> three<br />

horizontal practices, T1 : Conventional tillage (primary, secondary and tertiary tillage as per<br />

existing farmers/ researchers practice and sowing by seed cum ferti-drill), T2 : Zero tillage<br />

(Sowing by seed cum-ferti-drill / cultivator; glyphosate spray to kill existing vegetation after<br />

sowing), T3 : Minimum (Reduced) tillage (Basal fertilizer dose application followed by Disking<br />

and sowing by seed drill after running cultivator that incorporates basal fertilizers) and two<br />

vertical practices (residue mulch and without residue mulch). Strip plot design was selected by<br />

using OPISTAT S<strong>of</strong>tware and NTJ 5 variety was selected for the experiment with three-year<br />

duration (Tesfahunegn, 2012). The following parameters like panicle weight, panicle length,<br />

1000 seed weight, grain and straw yield & harvest index were recorded.<br />

Results<br />

Tillage practices, mulch practices and their interaction had significant influence on yield<br />

parameters <strong>of</strong> sorghum like panicle weight, panicle length, grain yield, straw yield and harvest<br />

index. The interaction between tillage and mulch practices was non-significant. Yield attributes<br />

and yields <strong>of</strong> rabi sorghum as influenced by tillage and mulch as shown in Table 1. The highest<br />

pooled grain yield and straw yield was obtained at zero tillage and lowest pooled grain yield and<br />

straw yield at conventional tillage because <strong>of</strong> zero tillage was attributed to improvement in yield<br />

components namely, number <strong>of</strong> panicle weight and 1000 grain weight. In addition to mulching<br />

practices, the highest pooled grain yield and straw yield (3692 kg/ha) (6810 kg/ha) was obtained<br />

at zero tillage system compare to other tillage, because <strong>of</strong> mulching practices reduces the<br />

evaporation <strong>of</strong> water and increases the water holding capacity which results in higher yields.<br />

Although, harvest index was not affected by mulch rate, tillage system and their interaction (X.<br />

Wang and Dai, 2012)] also obtained highest harvest index value on the zero-tillage system.<br />

Conclusion<br />

The effect <strong>of</strong> different tillage practices and with mulch & without mulch on sorghum crop was<br />

conducted at Regional Agricultural Research Station, Nandyal. The results were observed with<br />

highest grain and straw yield was obtained at zero tillage system compare to conventional and<br />

minimum tillage system. The highest harvest index was observed in zero tillage system compare<br />

to other.<br />

615 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

References<br />

Gebreyesus Brhane Tesfahunegn, 2012, Effect <strong>of</strong> Tillage and Fertilizer Practices on Sorghum<br />

Production in Abergelle Area, Northern Ethiopia. 4(2):52-69.<br />

X. Wang, H. Wu, K. Dai., 2012, Tillage and crop residue effects on rainfed wheat and maize<br />

production in northern China. Field Crops Research, 132:106–116.<br />

Yield attributes and yields <strong>of</strong> rabi sorghum as influenced by tillage and mulch<br />

Treatments<br />

Panicle<br />

weight (g)<br />

Horizontal factor: Tillage practices - 3<br />

Panicle<br />

length<br />

(cm)<br />

1000 seed<br />

weight (g)<br />

Pooled<br />

Grain<br />

yield<br />

(kg/ha)<br />

Straw yield<br />

(kg/ha)<br />

Harvest<br />

index (%)<br />

T1 : Conventional tillage 87.5 19.4 35.6 3326 6218 36.96<br />

T2 : Zero tillage 98.7 22.9 36.8 3724 6857 37.38<br />

T3 : Minimum tillage 97.9 21.8 36.3 3607 6616 37.26<br />

SEm+ 1.18 0.36 0.18 37 73 0.45<br />

CD (P=0.05) 4.17 1.25 0.62 130 259 NS<br />

CV (%) 3.9 4.2 2.6 10 10 6.7<br />

Vertical factor: Mulch practices – 2<br />

M1 : No residue mulch 91.9 20.7 35.1 3412 6317 37.08<br />

M2 : Residue mulch 97.6 22.0 37.3 3692 6810 37.32<br />

SEm+ 0.68 0.39 0.22 27 44 0.27<br />

CD (P=0.05) 2.2 1.28 0.71 83 143 NS<br />

CV (%) 5.2 2.1 3.8 8.8 8.7 5.1<br />

Interaction (Mulch x Tillage)<br />

SEm+ 1.67 0.50 0.25 52 104 0.64<br />

CD (P=0.05) NS NS NS NS NS NS<br />

Interaction (Tillage x Mulch)<br />

SEm+ 1.44 0.60 0.32 48 91 0.56<br />

CD (P=0.05) NS NS NS NS NS NS<br />

616 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

T4a-25P-1014<br />

Effect <strong>of</strong> Tillage Practices and Mulching Operations on Productivity <strong>of</strong> Maize<br />

Under Dryland Conditions<br />

Pramod Kumar, Mintu Job, N. Kumari, Abhishek Patel and D.N. Singh<br />

Birsa Agricultural University, Ranchi, Jharkhand (India)<br />

Dryland agriculture is mainly dependent on rainfall, especially in India, there are different kinds<br />

<strong>of</strong> tillage operations such as conventional tillage, no-tillage, reduced tillage etc. Conventional<br />

tillage practices and crop residue removal will lead to a decrease in soil organic matter due to<br />

accelerated decomposition and loss <strong>of</strong> topsoil, thereby adversely affecting soil properties.<br />

Recently, reduced tillage practices have been gaining popularity.<br />

Conservation tillage<br />

techniques, which are soil-surface crop residue management systems with minimum or notillage,<br />

are crucial in efficiently saving more precipitation for crop production. Among the<br />

management practices for increasing water use efficiency (WUE) one <strong>of</strong> them is mulching. Any<br />

material spread on the surface <strong>of</strong> soil to protect it from rain drop, solar radiation or evaporation is<br />

called mulch.<br />

Maize in India contributes nearly 9 % in the national food basket. In addition to staple food for<br />

human beings and quality feed for animals, maize serves as a basic raw material as an ingredient<br />

to many industrial products that include starch, oil, protein, alcoholic beverages, food<br />

sweeteners, pharmaceutical, cosmetic, film, textile, gum, package and paper industries etc.The<br />

crop is cultivated throughout the year in all states <strong>of</strong> the country for various purposes including<br />

grain, fodder, green cobs, sweet corn, baby corn, pop corn in peri-urban areas.<br />

Methodology<br />

A field experiment was conducted at the research farm <strong>of</strong> Zonal Research Station, Chianki<br />

situated at 23 0 N and 84.2 0 E under jurisdiction <strong>of</strong> Birsa Agricultural University (Ranchi),<br />

Jharkhand, India during 2017 and 2020. The soil <strong>of</strong> the experimental field was sandy loam in<br />

texture with pH 6.7. The soil <strong>of</strong> the experimental site was medium in organic carbon (0.53 %),<br />

available nitrogen (128 kg ha -1 ), phosphorus (70 kg ha -1 ) and low in available potassium (45 kg<br />

ha -1 ). There was total <strong>of</strong> twelve treatments comprisingConventional Tillage + Without Mulch,<br />

Conventional Tillage + Farm waste Mulch, Conventional Tillage + Polythene Mulch,<br />

Conventional Tillage + Soil Mulch, Minimum Tillage + Without Mulch, Minimum Tillage+<br />

Farm waste Mulch, Minimum Tillage+ Polythene Mulch, Minimum Tillage+ Soil Mulch, Raised<br />

Bed Sowing + Without Mulch, Raised Bed Sowing + Farm waste Mulch, Raised Bed Sowing +<br />

Polythene Mulch and Raised Bed Sowing + Soil Mulch. The experiment was laid out in a<br />

617 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

randomized block design with three replications. All the recommended packages and practices<br />

were followed to grow crops.<br />

Marketable produce <strong>of</strong> crop in terms <strong>of</strong> per hectare and their saleable value was worked out. The<br />

economics was calculated by considering the actual expenditure incurred on various operations,<br />

prevalent labour charges and current price <strong>of</strong> inputs and value <strong>of</strong> produce in the market. The net<br />

returns were computed taking into account market prices.<br />

Results<br />

The maximum value <strong>of</strong> plant height (219.6 cm) observed in case <strong>of</strong> Raised Bed Sowing + Soil<br />

Mulch, while minimum plant height (169.4 cm) was recorded with Minimum Tillage + Without<br />

Mulch. Maximum cob length (25.59 cm) was observed in case <strong>of</strong> Raised Bed Sowing + olythene<br />

Mulch, while minimum cob length (16.98 cm) was recorded Minimum Tillage + Without Mulch.<br />

Test weight (1000-grain weight <strong>of</strong> 295.75 g was observed in case <strong>of</strong> Conventional Tillage +<br />

Polythene Mulch, while maximum yield (4825 kg/ha) was recorded Raised Bed Sowing +<br />

Polythene Mulchwhile minimum yield (3025 kg/ha) was recorded Minimum Tillage + Without<br />

Mulch and rain water use efficiency was (6.209 kg/ha/mm).Out <strong>of</strong> different treatment<br />

combinations the treatment combination the Raised Bed sowing with Polythene gave significant<br />

higher gain yield 4825 (kg/ha) and also higher rain water use efficiency (6.21 kg/ ha/mm)<br />

whereas net B:C ratio (2.13) was found higher in case <strong>of</strong> Raised Bed Sowing with Farm waste<br />

Mulch. The treatment containing Raised Bed Sowing with Polythene Mulch gave 96% weed<br />

control whereas Conventional Tillage Without Mulch gave result equal to one complete<br />

weeding.<br />

Conclusion<br />

A comparison <strong>of</strong> different tillage treatments showed that Raised Bed sowing with Polythene<br />

gave significant higher gain yield (4825 kg/ha) and also higher rain water use efficiency (6.21<br />

kg/ ha/mm) whereas net B:C ratio (2.13) was found higher in case <strong>of</strong> Raised Bed Sowing with<br />

Farm waste Mulch.<br />

References<br />

Gan, Y., Siddique, K. H. M., Turner, N. C., Li, X. G., Niu, J. Y., Yang, C. 2013. Ridge-furrow<br />

mulching systems—an innovative technique for boosting crop productivity in semiarid<br />

rain-fed environments. Adv. Agron. 118: 429–476. 10.1016/b978-0-12-405942-<br />

9.00007-4<br />

618 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Yin, W., Guo, Y., Hu, F., Fan, Z., Feng, F., Zhao, C. 2018a. Wheat-Maize intercropping with<br />

reduced tillage and straw retention: a step towards enhancing economic and<br />

environmental benefits in arid areas. Front. Plant Sci. 9:1328.<br />

10.3389/fpls.2018.01328<br />

Zhang, X., Zhao, J., Yang, L., Kamran, M., Xue. X., Dong, Z. 2019. Ridge-furrow mulching<br />

system regulates diurnal temperature amplitude and wetting-drying alternation<br />

behavior in soil to promote maize growth and water use in a semiarid region. Field<br />

Crops Res. 233: 121–130. 10.1016/j.fcr.2019.01.009<br />

Yin, W., Chai, Q., Guo, Y., Fan, Z. L., Hu, F. L., Fan, H. 2020. Straw and plastic management<br />

regulate air-soil temperature amplitude and wetting-drying alternation in soil to<br />

promote intercrop productivity in arid regions. Field Crops Res. 249:107758.<br />

10.1016/j.fcr.2020.107758<br />

T4a-26P-1059<br />

Effect <strong>of</strong> Tillage Practices and Nitrogen Fertilizer Levels on Soil Total<br />

Carbon, Bulk Density and Porosity in Rainfed Maize-Pigeonpea Crop<br />

Rotation under Semi-Arid Tropical Climate<br />

A. K. Indoria, K. Sammi Reddy, G. Pratibha, V. K. Singh, S. Kundu, S. S. Balloli, S.<br />

Suvana, K. Srinivas, K. L. Sharma and H. Sahu*<br />

ICAR-Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, Hyderabad, India<br />

*Hemant.Sahu@icar.gov.in<br />

Conventional tillage (CT) increases the soil erosion and degradation processes, which causes<br />

significant losses in soil carbon content and ultimately promote the deterioration <strong>of</strong> different soil<br />

properties (Indoria et al., 2017). It has been reported that if appropriate soil management<br />

technologies such as conservation agriculture is adopted in rainfed areas for the improvement <strong>of</strong><br />

soil organic content and associated soil physical properties especially bulk density and porosity,<br />

the productivity <strong>of</strong> rainfed crops can be significantly improved (Indoria et al., 2017). At the same<br />

time, adequate supply <strong>of</strong> the mineral nitrogen could be one <strong>of</strong> the soil management practices in<br />

semi-arid tropical climate for improvement <strong>of</strong> soil environment. Crop response to mineral N<br />

involves increase in CO2 fixation and more above and below ground root biomass production.S<br />

oil bulk density can affect the seedling emergence, root growth and thus crop production (Blanco<br />

Canqui and Ruis, 2018). It can also influence the soil porosity. Therefore, this study was aimed<br />

to assess the impact <strong>of</strong> different tillage practices and Nfertilizer levels on soil total carbon, bulk<br />

density and porosity in different soil depths in maize-pigeonpea crop rotation under semi-arid<br />

tropical climate.<br />

619 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Methodology<br />

The experimental site was located at Gungal Research Farm (GRF) <strong>of</strong> ICAR-Central Research<br />

Institute for Dryland Agriculture, Hyderabad, Telangana, India. The duration <strong>of</strong> the experiment<br />

was 2012-2018.The treatments comprised <strong>of</strong> the three tillage practicesviz., conventional tillage<br />

(CT), reduced tillage (RT) and conservation agriculture (CA), and four nitrogen levels viz., N0=<br />

no nitrogen application (control), N75= 75% <strong>of</strong> RDN (recommended dose <strong>of</strong> nitrogen),<br />

N100=100% <strong>of</strong> RDN and N125=125% <strong>of</strong> RDN <strong>of</strong> maize and pigeonpea crops on yearly rotation<br />

basis. The soil totalcarbon was determined by using the CHNS Analyzer, Vario EL, bulk density<br />

was measured by core methodand porosity was calculated by using the formula: Total porosity<br />

(%) = (1-bulk density/particle density).<br />

Results<br />

Effect on soil total carbon content<br />

From the view point <strong>of</strong> soil total carbon content, the order <strong>of</strong> soil depth was as follows: 0-<br />

7.5>7.5-15>15-30>30-45 cm., irrespective <strong>of</strong> tillage and nitrogen levels. There were 28.1, 20.1,<br />

15.6 and 2.5% increase in the soil total carbon contentin CA, and 13.9, 9.9, 7.7 and 0.8%<br />

increase in soil total carbon contentin RT, in 0-7.5, 7.5-15, 15-30 and 30-45 cm, respectively as<br />

compared to the CT. The nitrogen fertilizer levels in relation to the total soil carbon content<br />

follow the order: N125>N100>N75>N0 in all the depths studied. There were 13.5, 18.7 and 23.7%<br />

increase in soil total carbon contentin 0-7.5cm soil depth,9.4, 16.1 and 20.6% increase insoil total<br />

carbon content in 7.5-15 cm, 6.0, 12.7 and 17.4% increase in soil total carbon content in 15-30<br />

cm soil depth and 0.8, 3.0 and 6.4% increase insoil total carbon content in 30-45 cm soil in N75,<br />

N100 and N125, respectively.<br />

Effect on soil bulk density and soil total porosity<br />

620 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Both tillage and nitrogen treatments had significant effect on bulk density and total porosity <strong>of</strong><br />

the soil at different depths. Among the tillage treatments, significantly lower mean soil bulk<br />

density was recorded in CA followed by RT and CT in 0-7.5, 7.5-15 and 15-30 soil depth,<br />

respectively. The lower mean soil bulk density by 7.2, 7.1 and 4.2% was recorded in N125 as<br />

compared to N0 at 0-7.5, 7.5-15 and 15-30 cm soil depth, respectively. An opposite relationship<br />

was observed between bulk density and soil total porosity. Significantly higher soil total porosity<br />

was observed in NT followed by RT and CT in different depths studies. The higher soil total<br />

porosity was observed in N125 at 0-7.5, 7.5-15, 15-30 and 30-45 cm soil depth as compared to the<br />

previous N fertilizer levels. The significant increase was to the extent <strong>of</strong> 10.9, 11.1, 7.2 and 6.0%<br />

at 0-7.5, 7.5-15, 15-30 and 30-45 in N125 as compared to the N0. The overall results were close<br />

conformity with the earlier findings by Blanco Canqui and Ruis, 2018 and Indoria et al., 2017.<br />

Conclusion<br />

The order <strong>of</strong> performance <strong>of</strong> tillage practices in improving the soil total carbon, bulk density and<br />

soil total porosity was: CA>RT> CT. While, the order <strong>of</strong> performance <strong>of</strong> N fertilizer levels in<br />

improving soil total carbon, bulk density and porosity was: N125>N100>N75>N0. The interactive<br />

effects <strong>of</strong> CA+N125 were found superiorin improving these soil properties as compared to other<br />

treatment combinations.<br />

References<br />

Blanco-Canqui, H. and Ruis, S. J. 2018. No-tillage and soil physical environment. Geoderma.<br />

326: 164-200.<br />

Indoria, A. K., Srinivasarao, Ch., Sharma, K.L. and Sammi Reddy, K. 2017. Conservation<br />

agriculture–a panacea to improve soil physical health. Current Science.112: 52-61.<br />

T4a-27P -1091<br />

Effect <strong>of</strong> Various Organic Sources <strong>of</strong> Nutrients on Growth and Yield <strong>of</strong><br />

Tomato<br />

S. V. Uphade, A. K. Gore and D. P. Waskar<br />

Organic Farming Research and Training Centre, Vasantrao Naik Marathwada Krishi Vidyapeeth,<br />

Parbhani, Maharashtra 431401(India).<br />

*<strong>of</strong>rtcvnmkvparbhani@gmail.com<br />

Organic farming is gaining importance in recent past due to want <strong>of</strong> residue free food and soil<br />

health improvement. In context <strong>of</strong> this there is increasing demand for organic vegetables from<br />

621 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

consumers particularly in metro and big cities. Among vegetable crops tomato (Lycopersicon<br />

esculantum L.) is important crop grown throughout the year which gives high yield within a<br />

relatively short period and it is economically attractive. In India tomato occupied 76 thousand ha<br />

with a production 18.39 Mt. In Maharashtra, tomato is a highly demanded vegetable in addition<br />

to it being a rainfed crop in kharif season. Using organic fertilizers especially in composted form<br />

had positive effect on soil health and fertility, which consequents increased yield in long term<br />

(Mehdizadeh,2013), increased cation exchange capacity <strong>of</strong> soil and increase availability <strong>of</strong> some<br />

nutrients such Ca, Mg, and P (Abou-Hussein et al.,2002). In this context an experiment was<br />

conducted to study the effect <strong>of</strong> various organic sources <strong>of</strong> nutrients on growth and yield <strong>of</strong><br />

tomato and the economics <strong>of</strong> various treatments.<br />

Methodology<br />

An experiment was conducted at Organic Farming Research and Training centre, Vasantrao Naik<br />

Marathwada Krishi Vidyapeeth Parbhani, during kharif 2018-2019. Eleven treatments with three<br />

replications were tested in RBD design. The tomato transplants were cultivated in the plot area <strong>of</strong><br />

6.0 x 5.4 m as gross and 4.2 m x 4.8 m as net plot. The variety PKM -1 was transplanted on 12 th<br />

July, 2018 with recommended management practices as per various treatments.<br />

Results<br />

The data on tomato yield, monetary returns, B:C ratio as influenced by different treatments is<br />

presented in table.<br />

Tomato crop yield, Gross Monetary Returns (GMR), Net Monetary Returns (NMR), B : C<br />

Treatments<br />

ratio as influenced by different treatments.(2018 – 19).<br />

Tomato Yield (t/ha)<br />

GMR<br />

(₹/ha)<br />

NMR<br />

(₹/ha)<br />

B:C ratio<br />

T 1: RDN 100 % through FYM 24.8 200213 122480 2.56<br />

T 2: RDN 100 % through Vermi<br />

Compost (VC)<br />

T 3: RDN 50% through FYM +<br />

RDN 50 % through VC<br />

T 4: RDN 50% through FYM +<br />

Neem cake @ 400 Kg/ha<br />

T 5: RDN 100 %: FYM + JA 3<br />

app (FA & SA) @ 20 days<br />

interval<br />

26.1 209626 145440 2.71<br />

25.9 204613 126766 2.66<br />

23.4 182826 119703 2.45<br />

25.5 200293 126765 2.58<br />

622 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

T 6: RDN 75 %: FYM +JA 3 app<br />

(FA & SA) @ 20 days interval.<br />

T 7: RDN 50 %: FYM +<br />

Jivamrut 3 app (FA & SA)<br />

@ 20 days interval.<br />

T 8: Jivamrut 3 app (FA & SA)<br />

@ 20 days interval<br />

T 9: FYM @ 5tn/ha + High Nitro 611<br />

kg/ha + Rock Phosphate 107 kg/ha<br />

+ Neem cake @ 400kg/ha.<br />

24.4 197173 120813 2.53<br />

24.3 195333 120083 2.49<br />

22.7 182640 119323 2.40<br />

26.6 209840 145441 2.74<br />

T 10: RDF 100% + FYM @ 5tn/ha 33.8 257920 183200 3.45<br />

T 11: Control. 20.3 163520 102160 2.30<br />

SE + 1.63 664.2 325.5 -<br />

CD at 5% 4.89 1986.2 973.8 -<br />

Mean 25.3 200363 130197 2.62<br />

The effect <strong>of</strong> various organic sources on tomato yield was found to be significant. The<br />

treatment T10 i.e. RDF + FYM 5 t /ha recorded the highest tomato yield (33.8 t/ha) which was<br />

found significantly superior over rest <strong>of</strong> the treatments. The lowest tomato yieldwas recorded in<br />

T11 (20.3 t/ha) i.e. control. The highest GMR was obtained with the application <strong>of</strong> RDF + FYM 5<br />

t/ha (T10) (₹ 257920/ha) which was significantly superior over rest <strong>of</strong> the treatments. Similar<br />

trend was observed in case <strong>of</strong> NMR. Whereas, application <strong>of</strong> RDF + FYM 5 t /ha recorded<br />

highest B:C ratio (3.45) followed by treatment T9 (2.74) i.e. RDF + FYM 5 t /ha + Phosphorich<br />

@ 157 kg/ha + Neem cake @ 400 kg /ha. Among the organic treatments, application <strong>of</strong> RDN<br />

100% through Vermicompost (T2) recorded highest tomato yield (26.1t/ha), highest GMR<br />

(Rs.209626 /ha) and highest NMR (Rs. 148440/ ha) over rest <strong>of</strong> the treatments. Similar results<br />

were reported by (Shankar et al. 2012) that organically grown tomato has found to be<br />

significantly influenced the nutrient content compared to tomato grown through conventional <strong>of</strong><br />

fertilizer application<br />

Conclusion<br />

The results revealed that the application <strong>of</strong> RDF + 5 t FYM/ha produced significantly higher<br />

tomato yield (33.8 t/ha), highest GMR (₹257920 /ha) and highest NMR (₹183200/ha). However,<br />

among organic treatments application <strong>of</strong> RDN 100 % through vermicompost (T2) recorded<br />

highest tomato yield (26.1 t/ha), highest GMR (₹ 209626 /ha) and highest NMR (₹145440/ha).<br />

623 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

References<br />

Abou-Hussein, S.D., I.EL-Oksh., T.EI-Shorbagy and EI-Bahiry, U.A. 2002. Effect <strong>of</strong> chicken<br />

manure, compost and bi<strong>of</strong>irtilizers on vegetative growth, tuber characteristics and yield<br />

<strong>of</strong> potato crop. Egypt.J.hort. 29(1)135-149.<br />

Mehdizadeh, M., Darbandi, E.I., Naseri-Rad H. and Tobeh, A. 2013. Growth and yield <strong>of</strong> tomato<br />

(Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) as influenced by different organic fertilizers.<br />

International Journal <strong>of</strong> Agronomy and plant production.4 (4):734-738.<br />

Shankar, K.S; Sumathi. S., Shankar. M. and Reddy. N.N., 2012. comparison <strong>of</strong> nutritional<br />

quality <strong>of</strong> organically versus conversionary grown tomato. J. Hort. 69, 90.1: 86-90.<br />

T4a-28P-1207<br />

Energy Efficient Tillage and Nutrient Management for Rabi Sorghum on<br />

Inceptisol<br />

S. K. Upadhye, V. M. Amrutsagar, N. B. More, G. Ravindra Chary, Archana B. Pawar, S.<br />

V. Khadtare, Shubhangi Kadam and R. V. Sanglikar<br />

All India Coordinated Research Project for Dryland Agriculture, Main Center, Solapur- 413 002<br />

Mahatma Phule Krishi Vidyapeeth, Rahuri, Maharashtra, India,<br />

zarssolapur@gmail.com<br />

Sorghum is the most important cereal crop <strong>of</strong> Scarcity zone <strong>of</strong> Maharashtra. The area <strong>of</strong> sorghum<br />

in Maharashtra is about 19.35 lakh hectare with a production <strong>of</strong> 31.62 lakh tones and<br />

productivity <strong>of</strong> 912 kg ha -1 . Productivity <strong>of</strong> sorghum is decreasing continuously due to use <strong>of</strong><br />

imbalanced chemical fertilizers accompanied by restricted use <strong>of</strong> organic manures as well as may<br />

be due to intensive cultivation <strong>of</strong> sorghum under medium deep black soils. Vertisols are selfpulverized<br />

soils and hence need not require special tillage operations for inverting the soil.<br />

Looking to the changing scenario, the cost <strong>of</strong> cultivation should be reduced at minimum level<br />

with resource conservation. However, majority <strong>of</strong> the farmers do not perform tillage operations<br />

every year and sometimes leaves the field fallow during Kharif and cultivate sorghum in Rabi in<br />

medium deep to deep soils. Therefore, an attempt was made to find out low-cost tillage and<br />

nutrient management practices, to study the effect <strong>of</strong> tillage and nutrient management practices<br />

on soil quality, to minimize dependence on chemical fertilizers and to find out energy saving in<br />

sustainable rabi sorghum production system under dryland condition.<br />

624 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Methodology<br />

The field experiment on rRabi sorghum (cultivar M 35-1) under dryland conditions was laid out<br />

conducted at AICRP for Dryland Agriculture Research Station, Mulegaon Farm, Solapur during<br />

2005-06 to 2016-17 for twelve years. The experiment was laid out in split plot design containing<br />

nine treatment combinations replicated three times includes three main plot treatments viz: 1)<br />

Low tillage (LT) - sowing with seed drill and light harrowing after sowing – (SSLH) 2)<br />

Medium tillage (MT) - one harrowing + SSLH+ one hoeing 3) Conventional tillage (CT) -<br />

plough once in 3 year + one harrowing + ridges and furrows + one harrowing + SSDH + three<br />

hoeings and three sub-treatments viz: 1) Organics - 50 kg Nha -1 (50 % CR+50 % LL) CR–Crop<br />

residue, LL–Leucaena loppings - N1 2) Organics + chemical fertilizers - 25 kg N ha -1 through<br />

urea + 25 kg N ha -1 through organics (50 % CR + 50 % LL) - N2 3) Fertilizers (RDF) : 50 kg<br />

N + 25 Kg P2O5 ha -1 - N3.<br />

The average nitrogen content <strong>of</strong> crop residue and leucaena during 12 years are 0.48 % and 3.04<br />

% respectively. The N, P and K were applied through urea, single super phosphate and muriate<br />

<strong>of</strong> potash respectively. The data on crop yield, total N uptake, economics, moisture use<br />

efficiency (MUE) <strong>of</strong> grain were recorded at harvest <strong>of</strong> sorghum. After harvest <strong>of</strong> crop, soil<br />

samples were collected (0-15 cm) and analyzed for organic carbon (wet oxidation method),<br />

available N (0.32 % alkaline KMnO4oxidizable), available P (0.5 M NaHCO3 extractable, pH<br />

8.5,) and K (Neutral normal ammonium acetate extractable) following the procedures described<br />

by Page et al. (1982).<br />

The input energy (MJ ha −1 ) and output energy was/ were computed for each treatment and<br />

expressed in terms <strong>of</strong> MJ ha −1 as suggested by Mittal et al. (1985). The energy use efficiency<br />

(EUE) derived as a ratio <strong>of</strong> output and input energy for each treatment (Sankar et al., 2013).<br />

Results<br />

In the tillage and nutrient management practices, the maximum input energy was observed in<br />

CTN1 (63924 MJ ha -1 ) whereas the minimum input energy was observed in treatment LTN3<br />

(4391MJ ha -1 ) followed by treatment MTN3 (4945 MJ ha -1 ). The maximum output energy was<br />

observed in MTN2 (70389 MJ ha -1 ) followed by CTN2 (68308 MJ ha -1 ). The maximum energy<br />

use efficiency was observed in LTN3 (13.865) followed by MTN3 (13.323).<br />

In case <strong>of</strong> nutrient management, the maximum energy use efficiency was observed in N 3 (11.919)<br />

followed by N 2 (1.966). Also, it is observed that, minimum energy <strong>of</strong> 48.22 MJ was required for<br />

production <strong>of</strong> one kg grain where nutrition <strong>of</strong> 50% organic and 50% inorganic N recorded highest<br />

625 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

grain (17.06 qha -1 ) and stover yield (40.84 qha -1 ) also (Table 1) as seen in the findings <strong>of</strong> Maruti<br />

Shankar et al. (2013<br />

The conventional tillage recorded significantly higher grain (16.62 q ha -1 ) and stover yield (40.46 q<br />

ha -1 ). However, it was on par with medium tillage (16.06 and 39.64 q ha -1 respectively). The moisture<br />

use efficiency (MUE) was maximum in conventional tillage (7.42 kg ha -1 mm -1 ). (Table). The N<br />

application 50 % through organic + 50 % through chemical fertilizer (N 2) recorded higher MUE<br />

(7.79 kg ha -1 mm -1 ).<br />

Conclusion<br />

One harrowing + sowing with seed drill and light harrowing + one hoeing at 3 rd week and 25 kg N<br />

through inorganic fertilizer (Urea) and 25 kg N through organic manure (12.5 kg N through crop<br />

residue (byre waste) + 12.5 kg N through Leucaena lopping or any green loppings) + 12.5 kg P 2O 5<br />

through fertilizer (SSP) is recommended for rRabi sorghum grown on medium deep black soils in<br />

scarcity zone <strong>of</strong> Maharashtra for getting higher grain and stover yield and monetary returns with<br />

saving <strong>of</strong> energy use and maintaining soil fertility.<br />

Effect <strong>of</strong> tillage system and source <strong>of</strong> nutrition on energy use efficiency and energy<br />

productivity <strong>of</strong> rabi sorghum (Mean)<br />

Treatments<br />

Total Input<br />

Energy<br />

(MJ ha -1 )<br />

Total<br />

output Energy<br />

(MJha -1 )<br />

Energy Use<br />

Efficiency<br />

Energy required for<br />

production <strong>of</strong> per kg grain,<br />

MJ<br />

LTN1 60744 48526 0.802 49.49<br />

LTN2 32548 60713 1.871 48.63<br />

LTN3 4391 60739 13.865 48.31<br />

MTN1 61336 55146 0.903 48.62<br />

MTN2 33140 70389 2.127 48.14<br />

MTN3 4945 65880 13.323 47.89<br />

CTN1 63924 55277 0.861 49.13<br />

CTN2 35728 68308 1.899 48.29<br />

CTN3 7532 65017 8.568 48.00<br />

Effect <strong>of</strong> tillage system and source <strong>of</strong> nutrition on yield <strong>of</strong> rabi sorghum (pooled mean)<br />

Tillage<br />

Nutrient<br />

N 1 (Organic N<br />

100 %)<br />

Grain (q ha -1 ) Stover (q ha -1 )<br />

LT MT CT<br />

Pooled<br />

Mean<br />

LT MT CT<br />

Pooled<br />

mean<br />

13.27 17.22 16.51 15.67 33.37 41.51 41.88 38.92<br />

626 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

N 2 (Organic N<br />

50% +Ferti N<br />

50%)<br />

N 3 (fertilizer N<br />

100 %)<br />

15.687 19.95 18.46 18.03 38.36 47.35 45.78 43.83<br />

16.71 20.47 19.22 18.80 42.79 46.88 45.65 45.11<br />

Mean 15.22 19.21 18.07 38.17 45.25 44.44<br />

Tillage Nutrient<br />

Tillage Nutrient<br />

T X N<br />

(T) (N)<br />

(T) (N)<br />

T X N<br />

SE+ 0.55 0.32 0.65 1.16 1.09 1.89<br />

CD at 5% 1.17 0.65 NS 2.46 2.20 NS<br />

References<br />

Maruti Sankar, G. R., Sharma, K. L., Srinivas Reddy, Singh, K., Rathi B. S., Mishra, A., Brhera,<br />

B. D., Subudhi, C. R., Singh Bhagwan, Singh, H. G., Ashok Kumar Singh, Rusthsa, D. K.,<br />

Yadawa M. S., Thyagaranj C. R., Mishra P. K., Suma Chandrika, M. and Venkateshwarlu,<br />

A. 2013. Efficient tillage and nutrient management practices for sustainable yields,<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>itability and energy use efficiency for rice-based cropping system in different soils and<br />

agro-climatic conditions. Expl Agric., 49 (2): 161–178 Cambridge University Press 2013<br />

doi:10.1017/S0014479712001330<br />

Page, A. L., Miller, R. H., and Keeney, D. R. 1982. Methods <strong>of</strong> soil analysis part 2. Chemical<br />

and microbiological properties 2 nd ed., Madison (WI), ASA and SSSA.<br />

Panse, V. G., and Sukhatme, P. V., 1967. Stastistical methods for Agricultural Worker 2 nd<br />

edition ICAR, New Delhi.<br />

Mittal, V. K, Mittal, J. P., Dhawan, K. C.1985. Research Digest on Energy Requirement in<br />

Agriculture, Sector, Coordinating cell, AICRP on energy requirement in Agriculture<br />

sector. Punjab Agriculture, University Ludhiana.<br />

627 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

T4a-29P-1540<br />

Enhancing the Productivity <strong>of</strong> Rainfed Maize Through Different Planting<br />

Methods and Moisture Conservation Practices in The Shivalik Foothill Region<br />

<strong>of</strong> Punjab<br />

Mandeep Kaur* and Anil Khokhar<br />

Punjab Agricultural University-Regional Research Station, AICRPDA Centre Ballowal Saunkhri,<br />

Balachaur, Punjab 144521- India<br />

*mkabc121@gmail.com<br />

Maize (Zea mays L.) is one <strong>of</strong> the most important cereal crops in the world, after rice and wheat.<br />

It is called the “queen <strong>of</strong> cereals” due to its higher productivity and diverse uses. Maize is a<br />

major Kharif season crop in the northeastern part <strong>of</strong> the state, known as the Kandi region which<br />

has an area <strong>of</strong> 0.393 million hectares. In this region, only 25% area has assured irrigation and in<br />

the remaining area, it is grown as rainfed or with limited irrigation. Erratic rainfall, prolonged<br />

dry spell, late-onset, and early cessation <strong>of</strong> rain are the major determinant in maize production<br />

during kharif season. Maize is sensitive to both water logging and moisture stress. Moisture<br />

shortage due to prolonged dry spells lead the crop to stressed conditions which affect mineral<br />

nutrition, ion uptake and it also alters crop physiological and biochemical behaviour. Thus, some<br />

cultural practices are required to protect the crop from prolonged dry spells and excess rainfall.<br />

The sowing method is an important factor responsible for soil moisture storage, judicious use <strong>of</strong><br />

water, good crop stands and so the crop growth. Planting methods are the most effective<br />

agronomic practices to reduce surface run<strong>of</strong>f and conserve the moisture in the crop root zone<br />

which can be used during moisture stress. In additionally, to planting methods, some other<br />

cultural practices such as moisture conservation techniques (mulching and earthing up) can help<br />

to cultivate this crop under challenging environments. Earthing up in maize at knee-high stage<br />

reduces competition from weeds and act as soil mulch after drying to conserve soil moisture by<br />

reducing evaporation. This may promote better establishment <strong>of</strong> crop and delay the surface<br />

drying which results in higher yields. Mulching is also an effective measure to conserve water<br />

and nutrient resources.<br />

Methodology<br />

The field experiment was conducted during Kharif season 2020 using PMH-1 cultivar in split<br />

plot design with four planting methods (flat planting, ridge planting, bed planting, and<br />

conservation furrow planting) as main plots and three moisture conservation practices (no<br />

intercultural, straw mulch @ 6 t ha -1 and earthing up) as subplot treatments at Ballowal Saunkhri.<br />

628 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Combinations <strong>of</strong> 12 treatments were replicated thrice resulting in total <strong>of</strong> 36 experimental plots.<br />

In the case <strong>of</strong> the flat planting method, spacing between the rows and plant-to-plant was kept at<br />

60 cm and 20 cm, respectively. A similar procedure was followed in the conservation furrow<br />

method except that after planting 4 rows, every 5 th -row plantation was skipped and plant-to-plant<br />

spacing was kept at 18 cm. In ridge planting, seeds were placed 6-7 cm above the base on the<br />

side <strong>of</strong> ridges spaced 60 cm apart with a 20 cm distance between the plants. In the bed planting<br />

method, one row <strong>of</strong> maize was sown on top in the center <strong>of</strong> raised beds 67.5 cm wide having a<br />

top flat <strong>of</strong> 37.5 cm and a furrow 30 cm with plant-to-plant spacing <strong>of</strong> 18 cm. The crop was<br />

harvested last week <strong>of</strong> September 2020.<br />

Results<br />

Among planting methods, bed planting method produced a maximum grain yield <strong>of</strong> 33.8 qha -1<br />

(Table 1). Bed planting gave a 20.7 percent higher yield followed by ridge sowing which<br />

produced a 12.7 percent higher grain yield at Ballowal Saunkhri as compared to flat sowing.<br />

Higher grain yield (33.5 qha -1 ) was obtained under earthing up and it was statistically better than<br />

under straw mulch and no interculture. Earthing up significantly increased the grain yield by 27.5<br />

percent over no interculture and 7.2 percent over straw mulch treatment. The highest stover yield<br />

was observed under bed sowing (72.6 q ha -1 ) which was significantly higher over the flat sowing<br />

(60.9 q ha -1 ) method. The bed planting method resulted in a maximum net return (31657 Rs) and<br />

B: C ratio (1.84) per hectare than other planting methods. Among moisture conservation<br />

practices, earthing up produced the highest net returns (30865 Rs) and B: C ratio (1.79). The<br />

higher net returns <strong>of</strong> 10475 Rs per hectare were obtained with earthing up moisture conservation<br />

practices as compared to no interculture.<br />

Effect <strong>of</strong> planting methods and moisture conservation practices on grain yield, stover yield,<br />

Treatments<br />

Planting method<br />

and economics <strong>of</strong> rainfed maize at Ballowal Saunkhri.<br />

Grain<br />

(q ha -1 )<br />

Yield<br />

Stover<br />

(q ha -1 )<br />

Net returns<br />

(Rs ha -1 )<br />

Economics<br />

B: C ratio<br />

Flat planting 26.8 60.9 20338 1.56<br />

Ridge planting 30.7 70.7 27094 1.75<br />

Bed planting 33.8 72.6 31657 1.84<br />

Conservation furrow<br />

planting<br />

27.1 66.7 21217 1.58<br />

CD (p=0.05) 2.95 7.24 - -<br />

629 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Moisture conservation practices<br />

No interculture 24.3 60.0 20390 1.66<br />

Straw mulch @ 6<br />

tha -1<br />

31.1 69.0 23975 1.59<br />

Earthing up 33.5 74.2 30865 1.79<br />

CD (p=0.05) 2.18 3.82 - -<br />

Rainfall (mm)<br />

Conclusion<br />

554.2 mm<br />

In conclusion, the bed planting method with earthing at knee high stage proved beneficial in<br />

increasing the productivity <strong>of</strong> rainfed maize under a challenging environment in the Shivalik<br />

foothill region <strong>of</strong> Punjab.<br />

T4a-30P-1578<br />

Escaping Moisture Stress in Steep Slopes by Altering the Time <strong>of</strong> Planting<br />

(Early Sowing) in Garden Pea<br />

N. Ajitkumar Singh*, Solei Luiram, K. Vikramjeet, N. Sureshchandra Singh,<br />

Yirmila.V. Zimik and P.A. Ramsem<br />

Krishi Vigyan Kendra Ukhrul, ICAR Research Complex for NEH Region, Manipur Centre<br />

*ajitsinghkvk@gmail.com, vkukhrul@gmail.com<br />

Garden pea (Pisum sativum L.) is one <strong>of</strong> the leading horticultural crops <strong>of</strong> Ukhrul district<br />

Manipur and is generally grown in October-November. Planting sites are generally located on<br />

steep hill slopes with an altitude ranging from 1,300 to 1,800 m above mean sea level. The major<br />

growers within the district are under the Sub division <strong>of</strong> Ukhrul and Chingai block. In recent<br />

years there has been a rapid decline in the production and productivity in this district including<br />

the adopted NICRA villages due to terminal drought and frost. Being, not economically feasible<br />

to go for irrigation throughout the season in such terrine, this investigation “altering the planting<br />

time” (early sown) was taken up. For this intervention, the NICRA village Ramva and<br />

Lungshang were selected, after analysing the rainfall pattern since 2013 and started<br />

demonstration from the year 2018. Soil samples were collected for moisture and other chemical<br />

analysis from demonstrating plots and farmers’ fields. The data reveal that moisture content was<br />

significantly high (30.2-36.5%) in the early sown demonstrated plot (August) as compared to<br />

farmers’ field (19.3-25.4%) late sown (October). Economically early sown gives the maximum<br />

yield <strong>of</strong> 28.3-30.8 q/ha as compared to late sawn (18.4-21.6 q/ha), and return per rupee<br />

investment is 3.2 and 1.8 respectively. From this study, it can be concluded that moisture stress<br />

630 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

in terminal period can be controlled and manage without investing on high-cost irrigation inputs<br />

but simply by utilising the residual moisture timely couple with other short or mid duration<br />

kharif rice varieties which may give farmer ample time for this demonstration.<br />

T4a-31P-1317<br />

Growth and Growth Parameters <strong>of</strong> Soybean influenced by different Land<br />

Configurations and Crop Residue Management Practices<br />

S. S. Kinge 1* , G. A. Bhalerao 2 , A. J. Rathod 1 , M. N. Wairagde 2 and J. D. Kalambe 1<br />

1<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Agronomy, VNMKV Parbhani, India. 431402<br />

2<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Agronomy, College <strong>of</strong> Agriculture Nagpur, 440012.<br />

* sunilkinge40@gmail.com<br />

Land configurations have a major influence on soil aeration, moisture availability, and<br />

temperature <strong>of</strong> soil which in turn affect the yield and quality <strong>of</strong> the crop. The broad bed furrow<br />

and ridge and furrow are newly developed methods <strong>of</strong> soybean cultivation in India. Therefore,<br />

need for standardized land configuration for the cultivation <strong>of</strong> soybean in India. Among different<br />

conservation measures, Crop residue practices on the soil surface to reduce the evaporation rate<br />

and discourage weeds is another water conservation practice in India. To conserve as much<br />

rainwater as possible during fewer rainfall years and ways <strong>of</strong> overcoming excess moisture. The<br />

combination <strong>of</strong> land configuration and crop residue practices conserves soil moisture and<br />

improves water use efficiency and grain yield. Hence field experiment entitled “Studies on Land<br />

Configuration and Crop Residue Management on Soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merrill)” was<br />

conducted at the Department <strong>of</strong> Agronomy, Vasantrao Naik Marathwada Krishi Vidyapeeth,<br />

Parbhani during Kharif 2019 to study the effect <strong>of</strong> land configuration and residue management<br />

practices on growth and yield <strong>of</strong> soybean.<br />

Methodology<br />

The experiment was carried out in split plot design with three replications consisting <strong>of</strong> fifteen<br />

treatment combinations. The land configuration practices consisted <strong>of</strong> Flatbed (L1), Broad bed<br />

furrow (L2), Ridges & furrow (L3) and five treatments on crop residue management practices <strong>of</strong><br />

Crop Residue @1.25T ha -1 +5 kg ha -1 decomposing microorganism (CR1), Crop Residue@ 1.25<br />

T ha -1 +10 kg ha -1 decomposing microorganism (CR2), Crop Residue @ 2.5 T ha -1 + 5 kg ha -1<br />

decomposing microorganism (CR3), Crop Residue @ 2.5 T ha -1 + 10 kg ha -1 decomposing<br />

microorganism (CR4) and without crop residue control (CR5).<br />

631 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Results<br />

Among the land configuration treatments broad bed furrow recorded higher growth and yield<br />

attributing character. In Land configurations method L2 (broad bed furrow) recorded<br />

significantly higher values for plant height, functional leaves plant -1 , leaf area plant -1 , number <strong>of</strong><br />

branches plant -1 and total dry matter plant -1 than L1 (flatbed) and found at par with L3 (ridges &<br />

furrow) in soybean. The increase in seed yield kg ha -1 was attributed to increased growth<br />

parameters and yield attributes <strong>of</strong> soybean. This result correlates with the work <strong>of</strong> Karande<br />

(2006) and Rudrawar (2007).<br />

Among the crop residue management practices, the application <strong>of</strong> Crop Residue @ 2.5 T ha -1 +<br />

10 kg ha -1 decomposing microorganisms recorded higher growth characters and yield attributes.<br />

Application <strong>of</strong> Crop Residue @ 2.5 T /ha + 10 kg ha -1 decomposing microorganism (CR4)<br />

produced higher values for plant height, functional leaves plant -1 , leaf area plant -1 , number <strong>of</strong><br />

branches plant -1 and total dry matter plant -1 than rest <strong>of</strong> the treatments and found at par with the<br />

application <strong>of</strong> Crop Residue @ 2.5 T ha -1 + 5 kg ha -1 decomposing microorganism (CR3). The<br />

increase in seed yield kg ha -1 was attributed to increased growth parameters and yield attributes<br />

<strong>of</strong> soybean. These results correlate with the work <strong>of</strong> Shelar and Khandekar (2013) and Jadhav et<br />

al. (2017). The interaction effect <strong>of</strong> land configurations and crop residue management practices<br />

in growth and growth parameters was found to be non-significant.<br />

Treatment<br />

Growth and yield attributing character as influenced by different treatments<br />

Land configuration (L)<br />

Plant<br />

height<br />

(cm)<br />

Dry<br />

matter<br />

plant -1<br />

(g)<br />

Functional<br />

leaves plant -<br />

1<br />

Number<br />

<strong>of</strong><br />

branches<br />

plant -1<br />

L1-Flat bed 39.59 9.46 8.18 3.63 3.98<br />

L2-Broad bed furrow 47.39 13.42 10.93 4.81 5.56<br />

L3-Ridges & furrow 45.79 12.41 10.24 4.54 4.93<br />

S.E. ± 0.81 0.75 0.39 0.18 0.17<br />

C.D. at 5% 3.17 2.93 1.53 0.70 0.68<br />

Residue management (CR)<br />

CR 1 - Crop Residue @ 1.25 T ha -1 + 5 kg ha -<br />

1<br />

decomposing microorganism<br />

41.14 10.73 8.85 4.07 4.64<br />

Leaf<br />

area<br />

plant -1<br />

(dm 2 )<br />

CR 2 - Crop residue @ 1.25 T ha -1 + 10 kg ha -<br />

1<br />

decomposing microorganism<br />

42.67 10.92 9.05 4.15 4.85<br />

632 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

CR 3 - Crop Residue @ 2. 5 T ha -1 + 5 kg ha -1<br />

decomposing microorganism<br />

CR 4 - Crop residue @ 2.5 T ha -1 + 10 kg ha -1<br />

decomposing microorganism<br />

48.18 12.96 10.82 4.64 5.46<br />

49.18 13.61 11.74 4.77 5.77<br />

CR 5 - Without crop residue 40.94 10.59 8.45 4.00 3.42<br />

S.E. ± 1.40 0.54 0.35 0.15 0.16<br />

C.D. at 5% 4.07 1.58 1.01 0.45 0.45<br />

Interaction (L × CR)<br />

S.E. ± 2.42 0.94 0.60 0.27 0.27<br />

C.D. at 5% NS NS NS NS NS<br />

G. M 47.31 14.76 9.78 4.33 4.83<br />

Conclusion<br />

Among the land configuration treatments broad bed furrow recorded higher growth attributing<br />

characters Plant height, number <strong>of</strong> functional leaves plant-1, leaf area plant-1, total dry matter<br />

accumulation plant-1, number <strong>of</strong> branches plant-1 than ridges furrow and flat Bed. Among the<br />

crop residue management practices, the application <strong>of</strong> Crop Residue @ 2.5 T/ha + 10 kg ha-1<br />

decomposing microorganism recorded higher growth attributes Plant height, number <strong>of</strong><br />

functional leaves plant-1, leaf area plant-1, total dry matter accumulation plant-1, number <strong>of</strong><br />

branches plant-1 over rest <strong>of</strong> the treatments.<br />

References<br />

Jadhav, M. B., Kumbhar, M., Patel, M. V., and Shitap, M. S. 2017. Effect <strong>of</strong> land configuration<br />

and mulches on growth, yield and economics <strong>of</strong> summer groundnut. Trends in<br />

Biosciences, 10(27), 0974-8431, 5798<br />

Karande, S. V., Khot, R. B., and Hankare, R. H. 2006. Effect <strong>of</strong> layout and nutrient integration<br />

on yield and nutrient uptake <strong>of</strong> chickpea. J. Maharashtra Agric. Univ. 31(3), 370.<br />

Rudrawar, P. P. 2007 Studies on in situ moisture conservation and nutrient management in<br />

soybean (Doctoral dissertation, Vasantrao Naik Marathwada Krishi Vidyapeeth,<br />

Parbhani).<br />

Shelar, D. N. and Khandekar, B. S. 2013. Performance <strong>of</strong> moisture conservation practices on<br />

growth and yield <strong>of</strong> soybean (Glycine max. L.). Asian J. Soil Sci. 8(2), 283-285.<br />

633 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

T4a-32P-1314<br />

Impact <strong>of</strong> Application <strong>of</strong> Organics, Bi<strong>of</strong>ertilizers on Soil Nutrient status and<br />

Quality parameter <strong>of</strong> Rabi Sorghum<br />

Kuruva Mounika 1* , A. Lalitha Kumari 2 , Ch. Sujani Rao 2 , M. Luther 2 , Sumanta Kundu 1<br />

and K. Sammi Reddy 1<br />

1 ICAR- Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, Hyderabad-500059.<br />

2 Acharya N.G. Ranga Agriculture University, Andhra Pradesh<br />

*kuruvamounika1998@gmail.com<br />

In India, the area under the sorghum crop is 5.62 m ha, production is 4.57 m t, and productivity is<br />

812 kg ha -1 . The imbalanced fertilizer use, and low organic carbon are attributed to the causes <strong>of</strong><br />

low system productivity and poor soil health. Integrated and balanced use <strong>of</strong> nutrients through<br />

chemical and organic sources and bi<strong>of</strong>ertilizers is a prerequisite to sustaining soil health and<br />

producing maximum yield. Objectives <strong>of</strong> investigation to study the effect <strong>of</strong> organic manures<br />

and bi<strong>of</strong>ertilizers on soil nutrient status and protein content <strong>of</strong> rabi sorghum.<br />

Methodology<br />

A field experiment entitled was conducted at Agricultural College Farm, Bapatla in the rabi<br />

season <strong>of</strong> 2020-21. Eight treatments in combinations consisting <strong>of</strong> three levels <strong>of</strong> fertilizers with<br />

FYM, vermicompost, neem cake along with bi<strong>of</strong>ertilizers were tried in randomized block design.<br />

Available nitrogen content in the soil was determined by the alkaline potassium permanganate<br />

method. Available phosphorus in the soil samples was determined by Olsens method. Available<br />

potassium in the soil was extracted using neutral normal ammonium acetate method. The total<br />

nitrogen in grains was estimated by micro Kjeldahl method.<br />

Results<br />

The available nitrogen was significantly higher in the treatment T4 (100% RDF + Neem cake @<br />

500 kg ha -1 + Azospirillum @ 5 kg ha -1 + PSB @ 5 kg ha -1 ) at blooming (390 kg ha -1 ), harvest<br />

stage (372 kg ha -1 ) and it was on par with T2 (100% RDF + FYM @ 10 t ha -1 + Azospirillum @ 5<br />

kg ha -1 + PSB @ 5 kg ha -1 (381 and 368 kg ha -1 ) respectively depicted in the table. The high<br />

available nitrogen status at both stages in treatments integrated with other components might be<br />

ascribed to the fixation <strong>of</strong> nitrogen by Azospirillum and an additional supply <strong>of</strong> nitrogen through<br />

FYM compared to sole inorganic treatments. Significantly higher soil available phosphorus<br />

(68.68 and 66.33 kg ha -1 ) and available potassium (434 and 415 kg ha -1 ) were observed in the<br />

634 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

treatment T2 (100% RDF + FYM @ 10 t ha -1 + Azospirillum @ 5 kg ha -1 + PSB @ 5 kg ha -1 ) at<br />

blooming and harvest stage, respectively and it was on par with 125% RDF (available P - 67.00,<br />

65.67 kg ha -1 and available K -432 and 412 kg ha -1 ) depicted in table 1. It enhances the P<br />

concentration in solution through the mineralization <strong>of</strong> organic P and solubilization <strong>of</strong> native soil<br />

P compounds by producing organic acids (Roy et al., 2017). Significantly higher protein content<br />

(12.29%) was recorded in the treatment T2 (100 % RDF + FYM @ 10 t ha -1 + Azospirillum @ 5<br />

kg ha -1 + PSB @ 5 kg ha -1 ) as shown in the figure.<br />

Effect <strong>of</strong> organic manures and bi<strong>of</strong>ertilizers on available nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium<br />

Treatments<br />

(kg ha -1 ) in soil<br />

Nitrogen Phosphorus Potassium<br />

Blooming Harvest Blooming Harvest Blooming Harvest<br />

T 1 : 100% RDF 346 328 57.99 55.67 390 373<br />

T 2 : 100% RDF+FYM @ 10 t ha -<br />

1 + Azospirillum + PSB<br />

T 3 : 100% RDF + Vermicompost<br />

@ 3 t ha -1 + Azospirillum +<br />

PSB<br />

T 4 : 100% RDF+ Neem cake @<br />

500 kg ha -1 + Azospirillum<br />

+PSB<br />

381 368 68.68 66.33 434 415<br />

370 349 64.16 63.33 429 409<br />

390 372 61.06 59.74 414 401<br />

T 5 : 125% RDF 379 361 67.00 65.67 432 412<br />

T 6 : 75% RDF+FYM @ 10 t ha -1<br />

+ Azospirillum + PSB<br />

T 7 : 75% RDF+ Vermicompost<br />

@ 3 t ha -1 + Azospirillum +<br />

PSB<br />

T 8 : 75% RDF+ Neem cake @<br />

500 kg ha -1 + Azospirillum +<br />

PSB<br />

336 324 56.90 53.04 389 376<br />

326 319 53.42 51.89 383 370<br />

338 326 52.90 51.10 375 367<br />

SEm± 14.3 13.5 2.98 2.67 14.23 13.63<br />

CD (0.05%) 43.2 40.5 8.94 8.01 42.69 40.89<br />

635 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Conclusion<br />

Effect <strong>of</strong> organic manures and bi<strong>of</strong>ertilizers on protein content (%) <strong>of</strong> sorghum grain<br />

Integrated use <strong>of</strong> inorganics and organics (FYM) along with bi<strong>of</strong>ertilizers not only increased<br />

yield but also improved soil health by increasing organic carbon, available nutrient contents and<br />

soil biological activity.<br />

Reference<br />

Roy MD, Sarkar GK, Das I, Karmakar R and Saha, T. 2017. Integrated use <strong>of</strong> inorganic,<br />

biological, and organic manures on rice productivity, nitrogen uptake, and soil health in<br />

Gangetic alluvial soils <strong>of</strong> West Bengal. J. Indian Soc. Soil Sci. 65 (1): 72-79.<br />

T4a-33P -1276<br />

Impact <strong>of</strong> Zinc and Iron-Enriched Organic Manures on Rabi Grain Sorghum<br />

T. Bhagavatha Priya, Sk. Sameera, S. Isha Parveen and S. Balaji Nayak<br />

Acharya N.G. Ranga Agricultural University, Lam, Guntur, Andhra Pradesh, India<br />

Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench) is India's second most important millet crop after pearl<br />

millet both in terms <strong>of</strong> area and production. On account <strong>of</strong> severe grain mold menace in rainy i.e.<br />

Kharif season (Das et al., 2020), sorghum cultivation has shifted to Rabi season rainfed crop<br />

(also as an irrigated crop to some extent in rice fallows or after other arable Kharif legume crops)<br />

and has 64.36% share in 4.77 m t <strong>of</strong> total production during 2019-20 (DES, 2021). An estimated<br />

48 and 12% <strong>of</strong> Indian soils are reported to be deficient in Zn and Fe i.e. a DTPA extractable Zn<br />

636 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

and Fe content < 0.60 and 4.50 ppm being critical limit (Singh et al., 2009). These soil nutrient<br />

deficiencies are getting manifested in not only poor crop yields but also in their consumers. An<br />

estimated 17.3% and 43% <strong>of</strong> children under 5 years <strong>of</strong> age & 38% <strong>of</strong> pregnant women as<br />

reflected in low haemoglobin concentration i.e. anaemia are at risk <strong>of</strong> Zn and Fe deficiency due<br />

to dietary inadequacy. In this context, bio-fortification (increasing the minerals/vitamins in<br />

edible plant parts by genetic means) <strong>of</strong> staple crops has been explored as a sustainable strategy<br />

under the HarvestPlus scheme globally. Besides genetic approaches, agronomic efforts also help<br />

in the bi<strong>of</strong>ortification <strong>of</strong> staple crops. Studies were made to assess the impact the <strong>of</strong> use <strong>of</strong><br />

organic manures (FYM and vermicompost), enriched iron, and zinc sulfate fertilization on Rabi<br />

grain sorghum productivity, pr<strong>of</strong>itability and bi<strong>of</strong>ortification.<br />

Methodology<br />

Field experiments were conducted during the Rabi seasons <strong>of</strong> 2017, 2018 & 2019 at the All India<br />

Coordinated Sorghum Improvement Project (AICSIP) centre in Nandyal, Andhra Pradesh.<br />

Eleven treatments formed by the combination <strong>of</strong> two organic manures (FYM and Vermi-<br />

Compost, VC) @ 50 kg/ha enriched with four levels <strong>of</strong> ZnSO4 and FeSO4 (3.75, 7.50, 11.25, and<br />

15.00 kg/ha each) for a period <strong>of</strong> 15 days prior to soil application along with three checks i.e.<br />

control (no manure & no fertilizer), recommended dose <strong>of</strong> fertilizers (RDF, 80-40 kg/ha N-P2O5)<br />

and RDF + 15 kg ZnSO4/ha soil application + seed treatment with Azospirillum (0.5 kg) and<br />

Trichoderma (0.03 kg) were evaluated in RBD with three replications. Experimental soil was a<br />

deep vertisol rated as low for organic carbon (0.42%), DTPA extractable zinc and iron (0.52 and<br />

4.2 ppm) and has 201-49-342 kg/ha <strong>of</strong> available N-P-K. Fertilizer application was applied as<br />

basal with enriched manures applied as broadcasting. Rainfed sorghum cultivar ‘CSV29R’ was<br />

sown in 45 cm rows with a plant-to-plant spacing <strong>of</strong> 15 cm. Rainfall <strong>of</strong> 184.7, 82.6, and 99.0 mm<br />

was received during the 2017, 2018, and 2019 crop life cycle respectively. The sorghum crop<br />

was raised following a package <strong>of</strong> practices recommended for the rabi season crop. Data on<br />

growth, yield attributes, and yields were recorded, and economics were worked out using MSP<br />

<strong>of</strong> grain and assumed price <strong>of</strong> stover and market price <strong>of</strong> inputs and analyzed statistically. As<br />

data has a similar trend, results based on pooled analysis were presented.<br />

Results<br />

Growth, Yield attributes, and yield<br />

Plant height, a measure <strong>of</strong> crop growth was significantly improved due to 11.25 kg/ha zinc and<br />

iron sulfate each enriched manure (FYM and VC) application along with RDF over RDF. Pooled<br />

data reveals a significant improvement in Rabi sorghum grain and stover yields (19.64 and<br />

637 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

3.17%) due to the application <strong>of</strong> RDF + 15 kg ZnSO4 to soil and seed treatment with<br />

Azospirillum (0.5 kg) and Trichoderma (0.03 kg) as compared to unfertilized and un-manured<br />

control (2.75 t/ha). A significant improvement in grain yield <strong>of</strong> rabi sorghum (16.7%) was<br />

obtained with 15 kg/ha zinc and iron sulfate each enriched FYM fertilization over RDF (3.12<br />

t/ha). Similar but slightly higher (18.9%) improvements in grain yield were obtained with a 25%<br />

lower level <strong>of</strong> zinc and iron sulfate (11.25 kg/ha) with the use <strong>of</strong> vermicompost as a manure<br />

source for micronutrient enrichment. However, both the FYM and VC-enriched Zn and Fe<br />

treatments remained at par with RDF + 15 kg ZnSO4 + seed treatment for grain yield.<br />

Azospirillum seed treatment associated with symbiotic atmospheric N fixation has made it<br />

available to crop directly. Further, application <strong>of</strong> 15 kg/ha ZnSO4 along with bi<strong>of</strong>ertilizers on<br />

account <strong>of</strong> its enhanced supplies <strong>of</strong> Zn and S in the soil might have improved their crop uptake<br />

from a soil low in DTPA extractable Zn and thus together have boosted the crop performance<br />

over RDF alone and thus has markedly better performance than control. In manure-enriched Zn<br />

and Fe treatment, Fe supplies in soil are improved in addition to Zn & S and thus rabi sorghum<br />

crop performance is boosted in a DTPA extractable zinc and iron deficit soil. Superiority <strong>of</strong><br />

manure enriched zinc and iron fertilizers for rabi sorghum crop reported in this study were<br />

corroborated by the findings <strong>of</strong> Durgude et al. (2019) from Rahuri who found better rabi<br />

sorghum yields with use <strong>of</strong> cow dung slurry (500 L/ha) incubated 20 kg/ha ZnSO4 along with<br />

RDF (80:40:40 kg/ha N:P2O5:K2O) as compared to RDF. The current superiority reported with<br />

use <strong>of</strong> FYM enriched zinc and iron sulphate @ 15 kg/ha each was however, four times higher<br />

than those reported by Kumar and Kubsad (2017).<br />

Economics<br />

Economics indicate that FYM enriched ZnSO4 + FeSO4 application @ 11.25 kg each or VC<br />

enriched ZnSO4 + FeSO4 application @ 7.5 kg each being at par with each other have recorded<br />

significantly higher net income than control (Rs. 39969/ha) as described in the table. VC<br />

enriched ZnSO4 + FeSO4 application @ 11.25 kg each has further significantly improved net<br />

income over RDF alone. The increases in net income could be ascribed to the cumulative effect<br />

<strong>of</strong> increase in grain and stover yields over control and RDF. Similar impacts <strong>of</strong> enriched Zn and<br />

Fe fertilizers on economics were reported by Kumar and Kubsad (2017).<br />

Zn and Fe Bi<strong>of</strong>ortification <strong>of</strong> sorghum grain<br />

Low iron and zinc status <strong>of</strong> soil is manifested in their low concentration in grain (Table 2) that<br />

was the lowest in unfertilized control (26.9 & 13.3 ppm) and RDF (28.1 & 17.5 ppm). FYM<br />

enriched ZnSO4 + FeSO4 fertilization up to 11.25 kg/ha has significantly improved the Fe and Zn<br />

concentration in grain, however, with VC, no such dose dependent differences in Fe<br />

638 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

concentration <strong>of</strong> grain were observed. Irrespective <strong>of</strong> manure used for enrichment, 15 kg ZnSO4<br />

+ FeSO4 dose recorded the highest Fe and Zn concentration in sorghum grain.<br />

Conclusion<br />

From the three-year (2017-19) investigation on rabi sorghum, it was concluded that soil<br />

application <strong>of</strong> RDF i.e. recommended dose <strong>of</strong> fertilizers (80-40 kg/ha N-P2O5) along with 15<br />

kg/ha ZnSO4 to seed treated with Azospirillum (500 g) + Trichoderma (30 g) is promising over<br />

no fertilizers. FYM or VC (both @ 50 kg/ha) enriched with 11.25 or 7.5 kg/ha <strong>of</strong> ZnSO4 +<br />

FeSO4 each was promising for realizing higher rabi sorghum grain yields and Zn and Fe bio<br />

fortified grains and net pr<strong>of</strong>its in Nandyal agro-ecoregion <strong>of</strong> Andhra Pradesh.<br />

References<br />

Das, I.K., Aruna, C. and Tonapi, V. A. 2020. Sorghum grain mold. ICAR-Indian Institute <strong>of</strong><br />

Millets Research, Hyderabad, India, ISBN: 81-89335-93-6: 86.<br />

DES (Directorate <strong>of</strong> Economics and Statistics). 2021. Third Advance Estimates <strong>of</strong> Production <strong>of</strong><br />

Food grains for 2020-21, as on 25 th May, 2021. Ministry <strong>of</strong> Agriculture and Farmers<br />

Welfare Department <strong>of</strong> Agriculture, Cooperation and Farmers Welfare Directorate <strong>of</strong><br />

Economics and Statistics. pp. 1-2.<br />

Kumar, A and Kubsad, V.S. 2017. Effect <strong>of</strong> fortification <strong>of</strong> organics with iron and zinc on<br />

growth yield and economics <strong>of</strong> rabi sorghum. J. Farm Sci., 30 (4): 547-549.<br />

Singh, A.K., Sarkar, A.K., Kumar, A and Singh B.P. 2009. Effect <strong>of</strong> l use <strong>of</strong> mineral fertilizers,<br />

lime, and farm yard manure on the crop yield, available plant nutrients, and heavy metal<br />

status in acidic loam soil. J. Indian Soc. Soil Sci. 12(11): 133-149.<br />

Growth, yield attributes, yield and economics <strong>of</strong> rabi sorghum as influenced using iron and<br />

zinc-enriched organic manures (pooled over 3 years)<br />

TREATMENT<br />

Plant<br />

height<br />

(cm) at<br />

harvest<br />

Panicle<br />

weight<br />

(g)<br />

Test<br />

weight<br />

(g)<br />

Grain<br />

yield<br />

(t/ha)<br />

Straw<br />

yield<br />

(kg/ha)<br />

Net<br />

returns<br />

(Rs./<br />

ha)<br />

Control (no manure & no fertilizer) 306.0 75.1 32.83 2.75 8.53 39969<br />

RDF (80-40 kg/ha N-P 2O 5) 306.8 89.2 33.93 3.12 8.64 44026<br />

RDF + 15 kg ZnSO 4 + seed treatment 308.8 88.6 34.33 3.29 8.80 47408<br />

RDF + 3.75 kg Zn and Fe each enriched<br />

FYM<br />

309.5 90.4 34.86 3.28 8.65 46570<br />

RDF + 7.5 kg Zn and Fe each enriched FYM 311.2 93.6 35.50 3.40 8.76 48942<br />

639 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

RDF + 11.25 kg Zn and Fe each enriched<br />

FYM<br />

313.8 93.6 35.76 3.55 8.76 51337<br />

RDF + 15 kg Zn and Fe each enriched FYM 316.3 95.3 37.04 3.64 8.86 52759<br />

RDF + 3.75 kg Zn and Fe each enriched VC 310.8 90.2 36.53 3.41 8.58 49552<br />

RDF + 7.5 kg Zn and Fe each enriched VC 313.3 93.5 36.73 3.52 8.65 51196<br />

RDF + 11.25 kg Zn and Fe each enriched VC 315.1 95.6 37.16 3.71 8.74 54855<br />

RDF + 15 kg Zn and Fe each enriched VC 316.5 94.2 36.76 3.70 8.85 53521<br />

SEm+ 1.91 1.14 0.14 0.146 0.089<br />

CD (P=0.05) 5.68 3.41 0.42 0.433 0.264<br />

Zinc and iron densification <strong>of</strong> rabi sorghum grain and their uptake as influenced by<br />

iron and zinc-enriched organic manures (pooled over 3 years)<br />

TREATMENT<br />

Grain concentration<br />

(ppm)<br />

Grain uptake<br />

(g/ha)<br />

Zn Fe Zn Fe<br />

Control (no manure & no fertilizer) 13.3 26.9 36.58 73.98<br />

RDF (80-40 kg/ha N-P 2O 5) 17.5 28.1 54.60 87.67<br />

RDF + 15 kg ZnSO 4 + seed treatment 26.0 28.6 85.54 94.09<br />

RDF + 3.75 kg Zn and Fe each enriched FYM 24.5 29.8 80.36 97.74<br />

RDF + 7.5 kg Zn and Fe each enriched FYM 28.6 30.9 97.24 105.06<br />

RDF + 11.25 kg Zn and Fe each enriched FYM 32.8 32.0 116.44 113.60<br />

RDF + 15 kg Zn and Fe each enriched FYM 33.5 32.6 121.94 118.66<br />

RDF + 3.75 kg Zn and Fe each enriched VC 27.0 31.6 92.07 107.76<br />

RDF + 7.5 kg Zn and Fe each enriched VC 29.0 31.3 102.08 110.18<br />

RDF + 11.25 kg Zn and Fe each enriched VC 33.2 31.8 123.17 117.98<br />

RDF + 15 kg Zn and Fe each enriched VC 35.0 32.6 129.50 120.62<br />

640 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

T4a-34P<br />

Improvement <strong>of</strong> Soil Fertility and Productivity by Use <strong>of</strong> Green Manuring<br />

Debesh Singh*, R.P.S. Tomar and Swati Singh<br />

NICRA, RVSKVV KVK, Morena, M.P.<br />

*debeshtomar315@gmal.com<br />

Green manuring is the practice <strong>of</strong> ploughing and turning in to the soil, under composed green<br />

plant tissue for the purpose <strong>of</strong> improving soil fertility and productivity. It increases the soil<br />

fertility by the direct addition <strong>of</strong> nitrogen and also improves the soil structure, water holding<br />

capacity and increase microbial population <strong>of</strong> soil by the addition <strong>of</strong> humus or organic matter.<br />

The soil physical properties that are affected by incorporation <strong>of</strong> the green manure includes the<br />

structure, moisture retention capacity consistency and density. Other properties such as the<br />

porosity, aeration, conductivity, hydraulics and infiltration are allied to the modifications to the<br />

soil structure. Post-harvest decaying roots significantly increased macrospores in soil. Green<br />

manuring had significant effect on increasing soil organic carbon. Green manure crops are grown<br />

in a field prior to crop cultivation and then cut and buried when approximately 50 percent <strong>of</strong> all<br />

plants are flowering. The practice <strong>of</strong> incorporating green leaf manure is different from green<br />

manure grown in situ, in this method the leaves are cut and brought to the farms in bundles.<br />

Green manuring is practiced according to suitability <strong>of</strong> soil and climatic conditions. Green<br />

manuring is generally done with sun hemp, dhaincha, cowpea, green gram, black gram; etc. these<br />

crops when rotten nourish the soil with their nutrients. Dhaincha as a green manure crop does<br />

well in the waterlogged and alkaline soils. Generally, a higher seed rate is recommended for<br />

green manuring. They absorb nutrient from the deeper soil layers and leave them in surface soil.<br />

The amount <strong>of</strong> green plant material buried stimulates the activity <strong>of</strong> the micro-organism<br />

inhabitant to the soil. Application <strong>of</strong> green manure crops supplements the chemical fertilizers and<br />

restores soil fertility. Therefore, it is an eco-friendly low-cost technology to conserve the natural<br />

resources besides maintaining environmental quality in a sustainable banner.<br />

641 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

T4a-35P-1325<br />

Influence <strong>of</strong> Different In-Situ Soil Moisture Conservation Techniques in<br />

Maize under Rainfed Agro-Eco System <strong>of</strong> Jammu Region<br />

Jai Kumar 1 *, A.P. Singh 1 , G. Ravindra Chary 2 , A. Gopinath 2 , Brinder Singh 1 , Rohit<br />

Shrama 1 and Sunny Raina 3<br />

1 All India Coordinated Project for Dryland agriculture, Rakh-Dhiansar, Samba (UT <strong>of</strong> J&K)<br />

2 AICRPDA, ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

3 Sher-e-Kashmir University <strong>of</strong> Agricultural Sciences and Technology <strong>of</strong> Jammu, Jammu and Kashmir<br />

(UT) 181 133<br />

*jkap006@gmail.com<br />

Maize (Zea mays L.) is the third most important cereal crop in the world after wheat and rice<br />

which occupies a prominent place in world agriculture due to its wide spread cultivation in<br />

tropics, sub-tropics and temperate regions <strong>of</strong> the world. Maize being grown globally on an area<br />

<strong>of</strong> about 197.19 million ha with a production <strong>of</strong> about <strong>of</strong> 1125.03 million tonnes. Maize in India<br />

is known as ‘King <strong>of</strong> cereals’ because <strong>of</strong> its high production potential and wider adaptability, is<br />

cultivated on an area <strong>of</strong> 9.21 million ha with a production <strong>of</strong> 25.13 million tonnes and the<br />

productivity <strong>of</strong> 26.3 q/ ha (Annonymous 2020). The state <strong>of</strong> Jammu and Kashmir has the<br />

distinction <strong>of</strong> being maize forms the staple diet <strong>of</strong> majority <strong>of</strong> the people living in the state and is<br />

grown on larger area than wheat and rice while in Jammu region, it is the second most cereal<br />

crop after wheat.<br />

Maize being the dominant Kharif crop <strong>of</strong> rainfed areas <strong>of</strong> Jammu province, is seriously suffering<br />

due to erratic and unpredictable rainfall, soils being light and medium texture leads to low water<br />

holding capacity and the lands are <strong>of</strong>ten having uneven topography, the rain water runs <strong>of</strong>f<br />

quickly and removes top soil and fertilizers leading to reduction in maize productivity. Maize is<br />

grown on farrowed or slopping lands, largely under Rainfed conditions and experience deficit<br />

moisture stress at different stages <strong>of</strong> growth. The uneven distribution <strong>of</strong> rainfall in time and space<br />

<strong>of</strong>ten causes dry spells <strong>of</strong> two weeks or even more resulting in moisture stress conditions during<br />

critical stages <strong>of</strong> maize crop, especially during the cob formation/grain filling stage which is the<br />

most critical stage with respect to productivity. Thus, the major constraint for establishing a crop<br />

is the lack <strong>of</strong> adequate moisture in the root zone (Hadda et al., 2010; Bhat et al., 2004).<br />

Therefore, it becomes essential to supply water to plant by adopting in-situ soil conservation<br />

measures for increasing water use efficiency. This cause adoption <strong>of</strong> in-situ moisture<br />

conservation practices to enhance productivity under dryland ecosystem (Subudhi, 2011). Hence,<br />

keeping the above facts in the forefront, a study on the influence <strong>of</strong> Different In-Situ Soil<br />

642 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Moisture Conservation Techniques in Maize under Rainfed Agro-Eco System <strong>of</strong> Jammu Region<br />

is proposed.<br />

Methodology<br />

A field experiment was conducted at the Research Farm <strong>of</strong> Advanced Centre for Rainfed<br />

Agriculture, ACRA Dhiansar <strong>of</strong> Sher-e-Kashmir University <strong>of</strong> Agricultural Sciences and<br />

Technology <strong>of</strong> Jammu during the Kharif season <strong>of</strong> 2016. The soil <strong>of</strong> the experimental field was<br />

sandy loam in texture, near to neutral, low in organic carbon and available nitrogen and medium<br />

in available phosphorous and potassium. The experiment was laid out in randomized block<br />

design during kharif season with three replications each. The experiment consisted <strong>of</strong> 9<br />

treatments viz. T1- Flat Bed, T2- Broad Bed Furrow, T3- Flat Bed + mulching with in-situ raised<br />

Dhaincha, T4-Broad Bed Furrow +mulching with in-situ raised Dhaincha, T5-Flat Bed<br />

+mulching with in situ raised Sunhemp, T6- Broad Bed Furrow +mulching with in-situ raised<br />

Sunhemp, T7- Flat Bed +mulching with Leuceana prunings, T8- Broad Bed Furrow +mulching<br />

with Leucaena prunings and T9- Farmer’s practice. The field was ploughed twice with disc<br />

harrow followed by planking to prepare a fine seed bed. Plot paths, replication borders and<br />

drainage channels were made manually. The plots were levelled before planting <strong>of</strong> kharif maize.<br />

However, Broad Bed and Furrow plots were raised using Bed making machine. Hybrid maize<br />

variety Double dekalb was sown in line during July using full dose <strong>of</strong> P and K along with 2/3 rd<br />

dose <strong>of</strong> N as basal dose at the time <strong>of</strong> sowing through inorganic sources <strong>of</strong> nutrients viz. Urea,<br />

DAP and MOP, respectively as per package <strong>of</strong> practices and remaining Nitrogen was applied<br />

just before the application <strong>of</strong> mulches while in farmers practice only Urea and DAP as inorganic<br />

fertilizers were applied in maize sown by broadcasting method without following any plant<br />

protection measures . However, the seeds <strong>of</strong> the mulch crops viz: Dhaincha and Sunhemp were<br />

also sown by broadcasting method at the time <strong>of</strong> final ploughing as per the technical programme.<br />

Leucaena pruning’s (Ex-situ) were taken from the plants growing in surroundings 35 DAS at the<br />

time <strong>of</strong> spreading <strong>of</strong> mulches.<br />

Results<br />

The experimental results revealed that all the moisture conservation techniques showed<br />

significant results over the other treatments. However, the treatment (T4) Broad Bed Furrow +<br />

mulching with in-situ raised Dhaincha recorded significantly higher values <strong>of</strong> Growth and yield<br />

and yield attributing characters and was found to be statistically at par with the treatment (T8)<br />

Broad Bed Furrow (BBF) + Mulching with Leucaena leaves and Treatment (T6) Broad Bed<br />

Furrow +mulching with in-situ raised Sunhemp. However, the treatment (T4) Broad Bed Furrow<br />

+ mulching with in-situ raised dhaincha recorded significantly higher grain yield (3281 kg ha -1 )<br />

643 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

alongwith highest net returns, B:C ratio and RWUE (kg/ha/mm) to the tune <strong>of</strong> Rs.38905/ha,<br />

1.61 and 5.19 respectively while the lowest net returns and B:C were recorded in farmer’s<br />

practice.<br />

Yield and economics <strong>of</strong> maize crop under different in-situ soil moisture conservation<br />

Treatments<br />

techniques during Kharif<br />

Yield (kg<br />

ha -1 )<br />

Cost <strong>of</strong><br />

cultivation<br />

(Rs ha -1 )<br />

Net<br />

return<br />

(Rs ha -1 )<br />

B:C<br />

ratio<br />

RWUE<br />

(kg/hamm)<br />

T1 Flat Bed 2445 19890 27983 1.41 3.87<br />

T2 Broad Bed Furrow (BBF) 2705 21740 31116 1.43 4.28<br />

T3<br />

Flat Bed + Mulching with in-situ<br />

raised Dhaincha<br />

T4 Broad Bed Furrow (BBF) +<br />

Mulching with in-situ raised<br />

Dhaincha<br />

T5<br />

Flat Bed + Mulching with in-situ<br />

raised Sunhemp<br />

T6 Broad Bed Furrow (BBF) +<br />

Mulching with in-situ raised<br />

Sunhemp<br />

T7<br />

Flat Bed + Mulching with<br />

Leucaena prunings<br />

T8 Broad Bed Furrow (BBF) +<br />

Mulching with Leucaena leaves<br />

2910 22240 33690 1.51 4.60<br />

3281 24090 38905 1.61 5.19<br />

2812 22240 32032 1.44 4.45<br />

3175 24090 36680 1.52 5.02<br />

2875 22665 33053 1.46 4.55<br />

3235 24515 37726 1.54 5.12<br />

T9 Farmer’s practice 2120 17479 24158 1.38 3.35<br />

CD (5%) 254 - - - -<br />

Conclusion<br />

On the basis <strong>of</strong> experimental findings, it may be concluded that among the different in-situ soil<br />

moisture conservation techniques in maize, Broad Bed Furrow (BBF) + mulching with in-situ<br />

raised Dhaincha, provided significantly highest grain yield with maximum net returns, B:C ratio<br />

and Rain Water Use Efficiency under rainfed situations which not only helped in conserving the<br />

moisture in the soil pr<strong>of</strong>ile but also enhanced the productivity <strong>of</strong> maize especially during<br />

mid/terminal dry spell situations which can contribute to food security <strong>of</strong> kandi belt farmer’s<br />

under the Shiwalik Foothils <strong>of</strong> Jammu and Kashmir.<br />

644 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

References<br />

Annonymous 2020. World agricultural production. United States Department <strong>of</strong> Agriculture.<br />

available at : https://apps.fas.usda.gov/psdonline/circulars/production.<br />

Bhatt R, Khera KL, and Arora S. 2004. Effect <strong>of</strong> Tillage and Mulching on Yield <strong>of</strong> Corn in the<br />

Submontaneous Rainfed region <strong>of</strong> Punjab, India. International Journal <strong>of</strong> Agriculture and<br />

Biology, 6: 26-28.<br />

Hadda, M.S., Khera, K.L. and Kukal, S.S. 2010. Soil and water conservation practices and soil<br />

productivity in North-Western sub-mountaneous tract <strong>of</strong> India: A review. Indian Journal<br />

<strong>of</strong> Soil Conservation, 28: 187-192.<br />

Subudhi, R. 2011. Effect <strong>of</strong> Conservation Trenches on Plantation Crop in Degraded Watershed<br />

in Kandhamal District <strong>of</strong> Odisha. Agrotechnol 2: 112.<br />

T4a-36P-1250<br />

Influence <strong>of</strong> Medicinal Crops used as Groundcover Management <strong>of</strong> Guava<br />

Orchard on Soil Properties <strong>of</strong> Northern India.<br />

Manpreet Singh 1 *and Kanwaljit Singh 2<br />

1 Department <strong>of</strong> Agriculture, Guru Nanak Dev University, Amritsar-143001 (India)<br />

2 P.G. Department <strong>of</strong> Agriculture, Khalsa College Amritsar-143002 (India)<br />

*manpreetjatana88@gmail.com<br />

The conventional tillage or use <strong>of</strong> weedicides is a common practice to control weeds in an<br />

orchard but it is not considered a sustainable approach. Better and scientifically grown ground<br />

cover crops may have been proved to be valuable for the orchard environment which includes<br />

increased beneficial organism populations, improved soil organic matter and resilience and<br />

reduced soil sickness (Lemessa and Wakjira 2015). Intercropping is one <strong>of</strong> the techniques <strong>of</strong> land<br />

utilization for greater stability in production as well as help the farmers in maintaining the soil<br />

fertility level (Bhattnagar et al., 2007). The combination <strong>of</strong> medicinal plants provides another<br />

chance to study diversification <strong>of</strong> existing land use systems for beneficial environmental impacts<br />

and higher pr<strong>of</strong>its as related to sole cropping systems. Hence, the experiment was carried out to<br />

evaluate the reliable intercropping system in the guava orchard to upgrade the soil health.<br />

Methodology<br />

During 2019-20, the field experiment was conducted at the Horticulture Research Farm, Khalsa<br />

College Amritsar. The eight-year-old plantation <strong>of</strong> guava at 6 x 6 m spacing, inter-cropped with<br />

645 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

six herbal medicinal plants crops. The data was analyzed by online OPSTAT s<strong>of</strong>tware and LSD<br />

(least significant difference) was calculated at 5 per cent level <strong>of</strong> significance (Snedecor and<br />

Cochran 1967).<br />

Results<br />

There was a significant variation in bulk density <strong>of</strong> soil at both depths. The lowest bulk density<br />

was recorded in mentha and brahmi intercropped block (T4 and T2) which was on par with<br />

turmeric, lemongrass and stevia intercropped treatments (T4, T3 and T5). The sole treatments (T7)<br />

had higher bulk density values among all other treatments.<br />

Soil porosity varied from 47.80 to 49.81 % and 46.93 to 48.74 % from both depths 0-15 and 15-<br />

30cm, respectively. While the intercropping <strong>of</strong> brahmi (49.81%) under guava-based system had<br />

significantly higher porosity which was very close to mentha intercropped blocks (49.56%) and<br />

at par with treatments T3, T5 and T6 and lowest value found in T7 (guava sole).<br />

The availability <strong>of</strong> N, P and K <strong>of</strong> soil at depth 0-15cm, were significantly higher under guavabased<br />

cropping systems in all the treatments than the guava sole (Fig.). Significantly maximum<br />

available N was recorded in T4, which was followed by T2 and the lowest available nitrogen was<br />

found in the T7 treatment.<br />

Avail. N Avail. P Avail. K<br />

350<br />

300<br />

250<br />

200<br />

150<br />

100<br />

50<br />

0<br />

Guava + Aloe<br />

Vera<br />

Guava +<br />

Brahmi<br />

Guava +<br />

Lemongrass<br />

Guava +<br />

Mentha<br />

Guava + Stevia Guava +<br />

Turmeric<br />

Guava sole<br />

T1 T2 T3 T4 T5 T6 T7<br />

Depth 0-15cm<br />

646 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

350<br />

300<br />

250<br />

200<br />

150<br />

100<br />

50<br />

0<br />

Guava + Aloe<br />

Vera<br />

Guava +<br />

Brahmi<br />

Guava +<br />

Lemongrass<br />

Guava +<br />

Mentha<br />

Avail. N Avail. P Avail. K<br />

Guava + Stevia Guava +<br />

Turmeric<br />

Guava sole<br />

T1 T2 T3 T4 T5 T6 T7<br />

Depth 15-30cm<br />

Effect <strong>of</strong> medicinal crops on soil available NPK at depth 0-15cm and 15-30 cm<br />

Similarly, the available P and K content <strong>of</strong> soil were influenced through different intercropping<br />

systems. However, soil P content was maximum under mentha crop (T4) and lower in guava<br />

sole system (T7) at both depths. The available K status <strong>of</strong> soil was recorded highest when<br />

medicinal crops were grown under guava-based intercropping as compared to guava sole.<br />

Conclusion<br />

From the present investigation it is concluded that he combination <strong>of</strong> fruit orchard and<br />

medicinal crops seems to improve the physical and chemical properties as well as status <strong>of</strong><br />

macro-nutrients <strong>of</strong> orchard soil more than guava alone, probably due to more and faster<br />

decomposition <strong>of</strong> litter fall and root biomass <strong>of</strong> cover crops. Hence, guava based hortimedicinal<br />

cropping system can be adopted in large scale to improve soil fertility status.<br />

References<br />

Bhatnagar, P., Kaul, M.K., and Singh, J., 2007. Effect <strong>of</strong> intercropping in Kinnow based<br />

production system. Ind. J. <strong>of</strong> Arid Hort. 2: 15-17.<br />

Lemessa, F., and Wakjira, M., 2015. Cover crops as a means <strong>of</strong> ecological weed management in<br />

Agro-ecosystems. J. <strong>of</strong> crop sci. and biotech. 133–145.<br />

647 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

T4a-37P-1318<br />

Influence <strong>of</strong> Natural Farming on Soil Properties, Crop Protection and<br />

Production <strong>of</strong> Quality Produce in Sugarcane<br />

K.V. Ramana Murthy, Dr M. Bharathalakshmi, Ch. S. Rama Lakshmi, M. Visalakshi,<br />

P. Kishore Varma and D. Adilakshmi<br />

Regional Agricultural Research Station, Anakapalli-531001, Andhra Pradesh<br />

The increased and <strong>of</strong>ten indiscriminate use <strong>of</strong> fertilizers and pesticides immensely harmed<br />

biological activity <strong>of</strong> the soil rendering it almost lifeless in vast areas. Agriculture production has<br />

tended to remain either stagnant or is declining despite application <strong>of</strong> high-cost inputs in large<br />

number <strong>of</strong> agricultural zones. Agriculture production despite troughs due to drought and aberrant<br />

weather conditions showed remarkable resilience but the quantum jump in production is<br />

conspicuous by its absence. Experts attribute this stagnation to destruction <strong>of</strong> soil health due to<br />

application <strong>of</strong> fertilizers and pesticides. Hence, this study was formulated to validate the natural<br />

farming practices in sugarcane + pulse intercropping for sustained soil and crop productivity in<br />

sugarcane.<br />

Methodology<br />

A field trial was taken up during 2020-21 and 2021-22 at Regional Agricultural Research<br />

Station, Anakapalli, Andhra Pradesh in sandy clay loam soils, The pH <strong>of</strong> the soil was 7.22, EC<br />

0.27 dS m -1 . The soil was low in available nitrogen (188 kg/ha), medium in available phosphorus<br />

(72 kg/ha) and high in available potassium (223 kg/ha). The micronutrient availability <strong>of</strong> zinc<br />

was 0.97 ppm, Copper 2.32 ppm, Manganese 14.58 ppm and Iron 10.15 ppm. The treatments<br />

were T1-Integrated Crop Management (University recommendation), T2-Natural Farming and<br />

Organic Farming and T3-Palekar’s Zero Based Natural Farming (ZBNF) replicated thrice. The<br />

test variety was a short duration sugarcane variety 2009 A 252 (Naveen).<br />

The weather<br />

conditions that prevailed during the growth period <strong>of</strong> sugarcane during these two years were<br />

congenial for the crop growth. A rainfall <strong>of</strong>1670.5 mm during 2020-21 and 1306. 4 mm during<br />

2021-22 was received with rainy days <strong>of</strong> 72 and 69 days respectively. The protocol was followed<br />

as per gelines for the three systems <strong>of</strong> cultivation.<br />

Results<br />

During 2020-21 in plant crop and in 2021-22 in ratoon crop, with respect to the soil physico<br />

chemical properties, available phosphorus and potassium, Zinc and Iron were higher in ICM<br />

while available nitrogen, Fe and Mn were high with OF & NF. Soil microbial population<br />

648 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

(Azotobactor and Azospirillum) at grand growth stage was higher in OF&NF followed by ICM<br />

whereas phosphorus solubilizers population was higher in ZBNF plots. Dehydrosenase and<br />

urease activity were higher in OF&NF. Acid phosphatase and alkaline phosphatase were higher<br />

in ICM. Earth worm population at different growth stages was higher in ZBNF. Similar studies<br />

by Singh and Srivastava, 2011 indicated that the highest enhancement in organic carbon content<br />

at ratoon harvest was recorded in the treatment receiving 100 per cent N through organic +<br />

bi<strong>of</strong>ertilizers + inter cropping <strong>of</strong> legume with rhizobium + pests/diseases control by either<br />

synthetic pesticides or biopesticides. Incidence <strong>of</strong> YLD was 2.82 per cent in ICM, 1.1 percent in<br />

OF and NF and 1.7 per cent in Palekar’s ZBNF. The cumulative incidence <strong>of</strong> ESB at 120 DAP<br />

was more in ICM followed by OF and NF while it was lowest in Palekars ZBNF. The incidence<br />

<strong>of</strong> INB was higher in Palekar’s ZBNF while it was lowest in ICM. Among three methods <strong>of</strong><br />

cultivation higher tiller population, stalk population, yield attributes and yield were higher with<br />

ICM followed by OF and NF while the lowest cane yield) was recorded with Palekar’s ZBNF.<br />

Application <strong>of</strong> FYM, cane trash, pressmud, vermicompost and biocompost in combination with<br />

recommended inorganic fertilizers have recorded increased cane yield over inorganic fertilizer<br />

alone, besides improving the soil fertility and economizing the cane production (Shilpa et al.,<br />

2017).<br />

Conclusion<br />

From the mean data it can be interpreted that ICM gave the highest cane yield, sugar yield during both<br />

years in plant and ratoon crop as well as compared to OF and NF and Palekar’s ZBNF methods.<br />

Effect <strong>of</strong> Natural Farming on soil physicochemical properties in post harvest soils <strong>of</strong> Sugarcane<br />

Particulars Initial ICM<br />

NF &<br />

OF<br />

Mean <strong>of</strong> 2 years<br />

ZBNF<br />

pH 7.22 7.19 7.14 7.12<br />

EC (dS/m) 0.27 0.245 0.232 0.211<br />

OC (%) 0.61 0.61 0.64 0.64<br />

Available Nitrogen (kg/ha) 188 207.5 213.75 196.87<br />

Available Phosphorus (kg/ha) 72 77.25 76.32 74.41<br />

Available Potassium (kg/ha) 223 234 234 223<br />

Av. Zn (ppm) 0.97 0.89 0.89 0.85<br />

Av. Cu (ppm) 2.32 2.94 2.52 2.58<br />

Av. Mn (ppm) 14.58 15.49 16.44 13.92<br />

Av. Fe (ppm) 10.15 12.92 13.61 13.50<br />

649 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Influence <strong>of</strong> natural farming on growth, yield, soil microbial and soil enzymatic activity <strong>of</strong><br />

sugarcane<br />

Particulars ICM NF & OF ZBNF<br />

Mean Mean Mean<br />

Shoot population (240 DAP) 79795 72251.5 42929<br />

Plant height (240 DAP) 240.7 193.835 152.75<br />

LMC at Harvest(cm) 232.95 184.965 146.785<br />

Avg. Cane Girth(cm) 2.47 2.525 2.41<br />

Number <strong>of</strong> internodes/Cane 25.7 23.315 19.7<br />

NMC per hectare 74621.5 68588 42583<br />

Cane Yield(t/ha) 76.45 65.15 40.235<br />

Intercrop (Greengram) yield-kg/ha -- -- 685.5<br />

Cane equivalent yield 76.45 65.15 55.725<br />

Brix (%) 20.9 20.995 20.325<br />

Sucrose (%) 18.99 18.87 18.95<br />

CCS (%) 14.655 14.425 13.8<br />

Purity (%) 90.25 87.06 89.08<br />

Sugar yield (t/ha) 11.32 9.45 7.68<br />

Jaggery Recovery (%) 7.42 6.56 5.54<br />

Jaggery Yield (t/ha) 5.72 4.24 2.74<br />

Azatobactor (x 10 4 cfu/g soil) 5.5 5.0 6.5<br />

Azospirillum (x 10 4 cfu/g soil) 8.0 3.0 7.0<br />

Rhizobium (x 10 5 cfu/g soil) 2.5 0.0 2.0<br />

Phosphorous solubilizers (x 10 4 cfu/g soil) 3.0 1.0 3.5<br />

Dehydrosenase (µg TPF/g soil/day) 2.1 3.4 2.5<br />

Urease (µg NH4+/5 g. soil/2 hr) 39.0 42.0 30.5<br />

Acid Phosphatase (µg PNP/g. soil/hr) 55.0 44.0 38.0<br />

Alkaline Phosphatase (µg PNP/g. soil/hr) 64.5 53.5 48.5<br />

Yellow leaf disease 2.8 1.1 1.7<br />

Ring spot 2.5 2.7 4.4<br />

ESB (% DH) upto 120 DAP 6.6 5.5 2.3<br />

Internode borer incidence (%) 24.4 49.0 41.0<br />

650 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

References<br />

Shilpa V. Chogatapur, Vishwajith and Reshma Sutar. 2017. Organic Sugarcane: A Review.<br />

Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci. 6(12): 1729-1738. doi:<br />

https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2017.612.196<br />

Singh, K. P. and Srivastava, T. K. .2011. Sugarcane productivity and soil fertility in plant -ratoon<br />

system under integrated and organic nutrient management in sub-tropics. Ind. J.<br />

Sugarcane Tech., 26(1):10-13.<br />

T4a-38P-1461<br />

In-Situ Moisture Conservation Techniques for Timely Sowing <strong>of</strong> Wheat Crop<br />

in Rabi Season Under Kandi Areas <strong>of</strong> District Kathua<br />

Vishal Sharma 1 *, Vishal Mahajan 1 , Berjesh Ajrawat 1 , Anamika Jamwal 1 , Ashu Sharma 1 ,<br />

Ajay Kumar 1 , Sahil Sharma 1 and B. C. Sharma 2<br />

1 Krishi Vigyan Kendra- Kathua, SKUAST-Jammu, INDIA<br />

2 FoA, SKUAST-Jammu, INDIA<br />

*vsagro14@gmail.com<br />

Wheat (Triticum aestivum) plays a vital role in meeting the food requirement <strong>of</strong> both urban and<br />

rural population in India but its yield is low in rainfed areas because <strong>of</strong> unavailability <strong>of</strong> moisture<br />

at the time <strong>of</strong> sowing which adversely affect the emergence and plant establishment. It is the<br />

most important staple food crop <strong>of</strong> district Kathua having 41% share, cultivated in about 52.493<br />

thousand hectares with production and productivity <strong>of</strong> 11.47 lakh quintals and 24.0 q/ha,<br />

respectively. Wheat-maize is prominent cropping sequence in the district. The farmers <strong>of</strong> Kandi<br />

areas mostly rely on the cultivation <strong>of</strong> maize and wheat along with some pulses and oilseeds for<br />

their livelihood. However, weather is a critical factor influencing the production <strong>of</strong> crops in this<br />

region. Weather effects on crop yield are manifold, making their assessment challenging. Timely<br />

rainfall in district viewed as a dominant climatic element influencing timely sowing and<br />

ultimately the yield <strong>of</strong> wheat crop. The frequent dry spells during the sowing time greatly<br />

influence the crop productivity and become the limiting factor to achieve potential productivity.<br />

Hence, to overcome with untimely rainfalls at the time <strong>of</strong> sowing <strong>of</strong> wheat crop as experienced<br />

in last few years an experiment was formulated to study the effect <strong>of</strong> In-situ conservation <strong>of</strong><br />

kharif moisture for timely sowing <strong>of</strong> wheat in rabi season under rainfed conditions in the form <strong>of</strong><br />

on farm trials (OFTs) during rabi 2021-22.<br />

651 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Methodology<br />

The study was based on on-farm trials carried out at five locations in NICRA village under<br />

Kathua District during the rabi 2021-22 using cv. WH 1080. The experiment was laid out in<br />

randomized block design with three replications, consisting <strong>of</strong> three treatments. The experiment<br />

comprised <strong>of</strong> 3 treatments: T1- Farmer practice (sowing after rainfall), T2- After harvest plough<br />

and heavy planking, T3- After harvest plough and heavy planking + mulching with maize straw.<br />

It represents the sub-tropical zone. Most <strong>of</strong> the farmers <strong>of</strong> this region are small and marginal<br />

farmers, are economically poor and practice subsistence farming. Under such conditions, due to<br />

unfavourable climatic conditions the productivity <strong>of</strong> crops is much below the national average<br />

productivity. District Kathua <strong>of</strong> Jammu and Kashmir is located on the northern side <strong>of</strong> the state.<br />

It lies between 32 0 00’ 17’ to 32 0 00’ 55’ N latitude and 75 0 00’ 70’ to 76 0 00’ 16’ E longitude. It<br />

has a total geographical area <strong>of</strong> 2.65 lakh hectare, out <strong>of</strong> which 1.27 lakh ha is gross sown area<br />

and 64829 ha (41/%) is net sown area. The soils <strong>of</strong> this area are deficit in organic carbon, humus<br />

and low in available nitrogen, phosphorous and medium in potassium. Other major constraints<br />

leading to yield gaps are low availability <strong>of</strong> quality seeds organic manures, bio pesticides, nonstandardization<br />

and non-adoption <strong>of</strong> improved production practices. Therefore, an attempt has<br />

been made in which moisture has been conserved for timely sowing <strong>of</strong> wheat crop on Kandi<br />

areas.<br />

Results<br />

Results indicated that the integration <strong>of</strong> plough and heavy planking with maize straw mulching<br />

resulted in higher grain and straw yield <strong>of</strong> wheat crop at all the location <strong>of</strong> OFTs in comparison<br />

to farmer practice. Combination <strong>of</strong> after harvest plough and heavy planking + mulching with<br />

maize straw resulted in significantly higher yield <strong>of</strong> wheat (38.20 q ha -1 ) as compared to after<br />

harvest plough and heavy planking alone (34.4 q ha -1 ) and farmer practice (30.0 q ha -1 ).<br />

Adoption <strong>of</strong> improved sowing technology increased yield by 27 per cent over farmers’ practices.<br />

Significant increase in grain yield <strong>of</strong> wheat crop with integration <strong>of</strong> plough and heavy planking<br />

with maize straw mulching might be due to timely sowing <strong>of</strong> wheat crop during untimely<br />

rainfalls. It was further revealed that higher rates <strong>of</strong> mulch conserved more soil moisture by<br />

providing better cover to the non-cropped area. Mulch application had also significant effect on<br />

emergence count. Increase in emergence count with high rates <strong>of</strong> mulches is attributed to soil<br />

moisture conservation. Mulch cover reduces evaporation losses from soil surfaces thus<br />

increasing moisture availability for germinating seeds. This contributed to better crop stand and<br />

this effect is reflected in the number <strong>of</strong> total tillers per unit area. Similarly, Sandal and Acharya<br />

(1997) investigated different tillage practices in a maize-wheat cropping sequence and reported<br />

652 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

that ‘maize sown on conventionally tilled plots mulched with lantana and sowing wheat with<br />

minimum tillage + mulching with lantana’ conserved sufficient moisture and resulted in timely<br />

sowing <strong>of</strong> rainfed wheat with higher grain yield. The economical parameters indicated that<br />

highest net pr<strong>of</strong>it <strong>of</strong> 53973 ha -1 was recorded with treatment T3 over farmer practices 40550<br />

ha -1 . Benefit cost ratio for after harvest plough and heavy planking + Mulching with maize straw<br />

and farmer practice was 1.69 and 1.40, respectively.<br />

Conclusion<br />

Hence from the investigations it is clear that plough and heavy planking with maize straw<br />

mulching was found to be effective in influencing grain yield <strong>of</strong> wheat crop as compare to farmer<br />

practice i.e. sowing after rainfall. Because under Kandi conditions this technique helped to<br />

enhance the moisture contents <strong>of</strong> soil by restoring the previous crop moisture and which is<br />

ultimately used for timely sowing <strong>of</strong> wheat crop during untimely rainfalls at the time <strong>of</strong> sowing.<br />

However, the economic feasibility <strong>of</strong> maize straw application is need to be investigated. It is<br />

therefore, proposed that alternative options/ mulching materials for maize straw needs also to be<br />

investigated for timely availability and at economical rates which could be as beneficial as the<br />

maize straw mulch and should be free from any allelopathic effects.<br />

References<br />

Sandal, S.K. and Acharya, C.L. 1997. Indian J. Agric. Sci., 67: 227-231.<br />

T4a-39P-1329<br />

Nutrient Management in Soybean Based Double Cropping Systems under<br />

Residual Moisture<br />

Pradeep Kumar 1* , C. K. Arya 2 , M. K. Sharma 3 and Pratap Singh 4<br />

1,2 AU, Kota, Rajasthan, India<br />

3 Agriculture Research Station, Ummedganj, AU, Kota, Rajasthan, India<br />

4 Directorate <strong>of</strong> Research, AU, Kota, Rajasthan, India<br />

*Pkprithvi139@gmail.com<br />

Soybean, also known as wonder crop, is a legume as well as oilseed crop. It is the third largest<br />

oilseed crop <strong>of</strong> India after rapeseed mustard and groundnut and ranks first in edible oil in world.<br />

India ranks fifth in area and production <strong>of</strong> soybean in the world. Traditional non-fermented food<br />

uses <strong>of</strong> soybeans include soy milk from which t<strong>of</strong>u and t<strong>of</strong>u skin are made. Fermented soy foods<br />

include soy sauce, fermented bean paste, natto and tempeh. Together protein and soybean oil<br />

content account for 56% <strong>of</strong> dry soybeans by weight (36% protein and 5% ash).100 grams <strong>of</strong> raw<br />

653 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

soybeans supply 446 calories and 9% water, 30% carbohydrates, 20% total fat and 36% protein.<br />

Nutrient management plays major role in higher production <strong>of</strong> crops especially in cropping<br />

system under dryland condition. Effective nutrient management facilitates required nutrient for<br />

the plant and help the crop to survive several types <strong>of</strong> biotic and abiotic stress in cropping<br />

system. Indiscriminate application <strong>of</strong> the inorganic fertilizers are known to have adverse effects<br />

on soil and human health. Therefore, it is essential to utilize organic sources <strong>of</strong> nutrients in order<br />

to increase the production <strong>of</strong> crop by maintaining soil fertility. Farmyard manure is a major<br />

source <strong>of</strong> nutrients, which also helps in maintaining soil fertility and increasing the water holding<br />

capacity <strong>of</strong> soil and productivity <strong>of</strong> the soil. Among soybean based double cropping, in haroti<br />

region <strong>of</strong> Rajasthan, coriander, linseed and chickpea are major crops that can be grown in on<br />

residual moisture in Rabi season under dryland agriculture. In Rajasthan, it is cultivated on 2.11<br />

million ha with a production <strong>of</strong> 2.26 million tonnes and contributes 14% <strong>of</strong> total country’s<br />

chickpea production (Anonymous 2021). Coriander is a major spices crop grown in experimental<br />

domain area <strong>of</strong> Jhalawar. Chickpea is having deep root system, able to utilize deeper residual<br />

moisture more efficiently and also facilitate deep sowing because <strong>of</strong> their large size seeds.<br />

Therefore, this experiment was conducted to study the nutrient management in soybean based<br />

double cropping systems under residual moisture.<br />

Methodology<br />

A field experiment was conducted under AICRPDA project, during kharif & rabi season <strong>of</strong> three<br />

consecutive years from 2018-19 to 2020-21 at Agricultural Research Sub Station, Aklera, AU,<br />

Kota. Geographically, this is located in the south east part <strong>of</strong> the Rajasthan with 24.41 o Latitude<br />

and 76.56 o Longitude. According to Agro-climatic zones the domain comes in Humid South<br />

Eastern Plain, i.e. zone V <strong>of</strong> the Rajasthan. The Humid South Eastern plains (zone V) are<br />

popularly known as the Hadauti plateau. Summer temperatures reach up to 45 o C and in winter it<br />

falls to 2.4 o C. The relative humidity is generally high. The annual rainfall varies from 452 to 985<br />

mm. The landscape is characterized by hills pediments and vast alluvial plain formed by the<br />

rivers Parbati, Parwan and their tributaries. The soil <strong>of</strong> experimental field was black <strong>of</strong> alluvial<br />

origin with pH 8.1, available N (146.57 kg ha -1 ), available P (29 kg ha -1 ), available K (239 kg ha -<br />

1 ) and has about 0.17% SOC. The experiment was laid out in split plot design consisting <strong>of</strong> three<br />

level <strong>of</strong> cropping system i.e. Soybean-Chickpea, Soybean- coriander and Soybean-Linseed in<br />

Main plots and six levels <strong>of</strong> nutriment managements practices i.e. 100 % RDF (Inorganic), 100<br />

% RDF (Inorganic) + Sulphur @ 10 kg ha -1 , 75% RDF (inorganic) + 25% through FYM, 75%<br />

RDF (inorganic) + 25% through FYM + Sulphur @ 10 kg ha -1 , 50% RDF (inorganic) + 50%<br />

through FYM and 50% RDF (inorganic) + 50% through FYM + Sulphur @ 10 kg ha -1 . The<br />

varieties were taken up as Soybean-JS-20-29, Chick pea –GNG- 1958, Coriander RKD -18 and<br />

654 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Linseed KBA-3. The data recorded were statistically analyzed by using technique <strong>of</strong> ANOVA<br />

i.e. analysis <strong>of</strong> variance and significance was determined as given by Panse and Sukhatme (1967)<br />

by computerised programme.<br />

Results<br />

Analysis showed that under different cropping system soybean-chickpea results significantly<br />

highest soybean equivalent yield <strong>of</strong> rabi crops (2444 kg ha -1 ), system productivity (3594 kg ha -1 ),<br />

system Net return (81583/- ha -1 ) and B:C ratio (2.02) as compared to other treatments. Deep root<br />

system <strong>of</strong> chickpea could lead to efficient utilization <strong>of</strong> residual moisture and nutrients also in<br />

deeper layer <strong>of</strong> soil pr<strong>of</strong>ile.<br />

Effect <strong>of</strong> nutrient management in soybean based double cropping system under residual<br />

moisture on Soybean equivalent yield <strong>of</strong> Rabi crops, system productivity, net return<br />

Treatment<br />

and B:C ratio (pooled)<br />

Soybean equivalent<br />

yield <strong>of</strong> Rabi crops<br />

(kg ha -1 )<br />

Cropping system<br />

System<br />

productiv<br />

ity<br />

(kg ha -1 )<br />

System<br />

Net<br />

return<br />

( )<br />

System<br />

B:C<br />

ratio<br />

Soybean-Chickpea 2444 3594 81583 2.02<br />

Soybean-Coriander 1724 2840 61943 1.69<br />

Soybean-Linseed 1250 2382 48065 1.22<br />

SEm ± 28 35 1297 0.03<br />

CD (P=0.05) 97 125 5161 0.12<br />

Nutrient management<br />

100 % RDF (Inorganic) 1673 2610 52239 1.58<br />

100 % RDF (Inorganic) + Sulphur @ 10 kg<br />

ha -1 1703 2680 54290 1.61<br />

75% RDF (inorganic) + 25% through FYM 1782 2900 61096 1.75<br />

75% RDF (inorganic) + 25% through FYM<br />

+ Sulphur @ 10 kg ha -1 1810 2980 63443 1.79<br />

50% RDF (inorganic) + 50% through FYM 1926 3208 70467 1.91<br />

50% RDF (inorganic) + 50% through FYM<br />

+ Sulphur @ 10 kg ha -1 1969 3285 72881 1.94<br />

SEm± 15 33 1159 0.03<br />

CD (P=0.05) 44 92 3221 0.08<br />

655 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

On other hand, application <strong>of</strong> nutrients in kharif as 50% RDF (inorganic) + 50% through FYM +<br />

Sulphur @ 10 kg ha -1 gave maximum soybean equivalent yield <strong>of</strong> Rabi crops (1969 kg ha -1 ),<br />

system productivity (3285 kg ha -1 ) (Chaturvedi and Chandel, 2005), Maximum System net return<br />

(Rs. 72881/- ha -1 ) & highest B:C ratio (1.94) which were found at par with the application <strong>of</strong><br />

50% RDF (inorganic) + 50% through FYM as (1926 kg ha -1 ), (3208 kg ha -1 ), (Rs. 70467/- ha -1 )<br />

& (1.91), respectively.<br />

Conclusion<br />

The results concluded that Soybean –chickpea cropping system with application <strong>of</strong> nutrients in<br />

kharif as 50% RDF (inorganic) + 50% through FYM + Sulphur @ 10 kg ha -1 was found<br />

productivity operative and economically worthwhile under dryland farming condition.<br />

References<br />

Anonymous 2021. http://www.agriculture.rajasthan.gov.in/content/agriculture/hi/<br />

Agriculture.html.<br />

Chaturvedi, S, Chandel, A. S. 2005. Influence <strong>of</strong> organic and inorganic fertilization on soil<br />

fertility and productivity <strong>of</strong> soybean (Glycine max). Indian J. Agron., 50(4):311-313.<br />

Panse, V. G. and Sukhatme, P. V. 1978. Statistical methods for Agricultural workers. ICAR<br />

publication, New Delhi. pp. 157 – 165.<br />

T4a-40P-1387<br />

Nutrient Management Practices in Finger Millet under Zero Tillage<br />

Conditions in Rice Fallows<br />

Y. Sandhya Rani*, U. Triveni, N. Anuradha and T.S.S.K. Patro<br />

Agricultural Research Station, Vizianagaram – 535 001,<br />

Acharya N.G. Ranga Agricultural University, Guntur, A.P.<br />

*sandhyarani33756@gmail.com<br />

Finger millet [Eleusine coracana (L.) Gaertn.] is a stable food crop for millions <strong>of</strong> people in the<br />

semi-arid region <strong>of</strong> the world, particularly in Africa and India. The crop is adapted to a wide<br />

range <strong>of</strong> climate and can be grown in variety <strong>of</strong> soils with medium or low water holding<br />

capacity, but requires minimum rainfall <strong>of</strong> 800 mm per annum. Tillage is done to control weeds<br />

which can ultimately lead to soil compaction, loss <strong>of</strong> organic matter, and death <strong>of</strong> soil microbes.<br />

So, all these after effects can be avoided by zero tillage. The major constraints for rainfed rabi<br />

cropping are faster receding residual moisture in fields after rice harvest, uncertain rabi rainfall,<br />

656 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

soil hardiness in the puddled rice fields, lack <strong>of</strong> short duration varieties that could facilitate<br />

timely sowing <strong>of</strong> rabi crops. To utilize residual moisture, pulse crops can be grown in rabi crops<br />

and they are need to be sown immediately after rice harvesting. But, now a days the pulse<br />

productivity in rice fallows is gradually decreasing due to poor germination <strong>of</strong> seeds, uneven<br />

moisture in the field, lack <strong>of</strong> improved varieties to withstand cold, Yellow Mosaic Virus,<br />

powdery mildew and water stress at flowering stage. Under such conditions most <strong>of</strong> the farmers<br />

are inclining towards growing <strong>of</strong> finger millet crop under zero tillage conditions Hence keeping<br />

in view the importance <strong>of</strong> zero tillage in conservation <strong>of</strong> soil health and with an aim to increase<br />

the production and productivity <strong>of</strong> finger millet, this experiment was conducted to standardize<br />

the fertilizer management technology <strong>of</strong> finger millet under zero tillage.<br />

Methodology<br />

The field experiment was conducted for three rabi seasons at Agricultural Research Station,<br />

Vizianagaram, Andhra Pradesh from, 2017 to 2019. The soil was sandy clay loam in texture, low<br />

in organic carbon, available nitrogen, high in available phosphorus and medium in available<br />

potassium. The experiment was laid down in Randomized complete block design with ten<br />

treatments replicated thrice. The treatments taken were: T1: 50% RDF, T2: 75% RDF, T3: 100%<br />

RDF, T4: 125% RDF, T5: 150% RDF, T6: T1+ 1% Multi KNO3 Foliar Spray, T7: T2+ 1% Multi<br />

KNO3 Foliar Spray, T8: T3+ 1% Multi KNO3 Foliar Spray, T9: T4+ 1% Multi KNO3 Foliar<br />

Spray, T10: T5+ 1% Multi KNO3 Foliar Spray. The Recommended dose <strong>of</strong> fertilizer (RDF) 60-<br />

40-30 kg NPK/ha <strong>of</strong> finger millet in the North coastal zone <strong>of</strong> Andhra Pradesh. The initial soil<br />

samples final soil samples after harvest <strong>of</strong> the crop were collected, for analysis <strong>of</strong> pH, EC,<br />

available N, P2O5, K2O and available micronutrients viz., Zn, Fe, Cu and Mn as per the standard<br />

procedures.<br />

Results<br />

Different levels <strong>of</strong> NPK fertilizers, influenced the growth and yield <strong>of</strong> finger millet under zero<br />

tillage in rice fallows (Table). The number <strong>of</strong> productive tillers/plant (2.7) and ear head length<br />

(6.79 cm) were found significantly higher in 150% RDF+1% KNO3 foliar spray. However, it<br />

was on par with 125% RDF+1% KNO3 and 150% RDF. These results confirm that higher rate <strong>of</strong><br />

fertilizers had a positive consequence on growth <strong>of</strong> fingermillet. (Sandhya Rani et al., 2017).<br />

Nutrient management in finger millet (variety, VR 847) in rice fallows under zero tillage showed<br />

that grain yield <strong>of</strong> finger millet was significantly higher (2830 kg/ha) in 150 % RDF NPK<br />

fertilizers over 100% RDF NPK fertilizers (2289 kg/ha) and was on par with 125% RDF NPK<br />

fertilizers (2602 kg/ha). Spraying <strong>of</strong> 1% KNO3 at flower initiation stage helped in further<br />

increase in grain yield. The yield increases due to spraying <strong>of</strong> 1% KNO3 was found to be 0.9 %<br />

657 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

at 50% RDF, 2.1 at 75% RDF, 2.6 at 100% RDF, 2.6 at 125% RDF and 3.3 at 150% RDF<br />

fertilizers and this may be due to more and rapid flower initiation and early vigor that resulted in<br />

more no. <strong>of</strong> productive tillers, bigger size ear heads and long finger length <strong>of</strong> finger millet.<br />

Significant yield reduction was observed at lower levels <strong>of</strong> fertilizers. but earliness in maturity<br />

was observed in these lower levels <strong>of</strong> fertilized plots. Higher Benefit: Cost ratio (2.53) (Table)<br />

was observed with 150%RDF + spraying <strong>of</strong> 1% KNO3. These results are in conformity with<br />

Nigade et al., 2013 and Sandhya Rani, et al., 2017.<br />

The physicochemical properties <strong>of</strong> the soil (pH and E.C) (Table 2), and organic carbon was non<br />

significant with the application <strong>of</strong> different nutrient management practices. Post-harvest soil<br />

analysis showed that soil available nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium were significantly<br />

influenced by different nutrient management practices. The maximum soil available nitrogen,<br />

phosphorus and potassium after harvest <strong>of</strong> the crop was recorded with 150 % RDF + 1% KNO3<br />

spray (270 and 76 kg/ha respectively) whereas soil available micronutrients showed no<br />

significant difference between the treatments. (Rurinda et al. 2014).<br />

References<br />

Nigade, R.D., and More, S.M., 2013. Performance <strong>of</strong> finger millet varieties to different levels <strong>of</strong><br />

fertilizer on yield and soil properties in sub-montane zone <strong>of</strong> Maharashtra. Int. J. Agric.<br />

Sci. 9(1):256-259<br />

Rurinda, J., Mapfumo, P., Van Wijk, M. T., Mtambanengwe, F., Rufino, M. C., Chikowo, R. and<br />

Giller, K. E. 2014. Comparative assessment <strong>of</strong> maize, finger millet and sorghum for<br />

household food security in the face <strong>of</strong> increasing climatic risk. European J <strong>of</strong> Agron. 55<br />

(4):29–41.<br />

Sandhya Rani, Y. Triveni, U. Patro, T.S.S.K. and Anuradha, N. 2017. Effect <strong>of</strong> nutrient<br />

management on yield and quality <strong>of</strong> finger millet (Eleusine coracana (L.) Gaertn. Int J.<strong>of</strong><br />

Chem Studies. 5(6):1211-1216<br />

658 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Yield and Yield attributes as influenced by nutrient management in rice fallow ragi<br />

(variety, VR 847) in rice fallows under zero tillage conditions<br />

Treatment<br />

Plant<br />

height<br />

(cm)<br />

No. <strong>of</strong><br />

productive<br />

tillers/<br />

plant<br />

Boot<br />

leaf<br />

length<br />

(cm)<br />

Ear<br />

head<br />

length<br />

(cm)<br />

No. <strong>of</strong><br />

fingers/Ear<br />

head<br />

Grain<br />

yield<br />

(kg/ha)<br />

Straw<br />

yield<br />

(kg/ha)<br />

B:C<br />

T 1: 50% RDF NPK 81.1 1.7 33.8 5.03 5.47 2129 5321 2.08<br />

T 2: 75% RDF NPK 82.5 1.8 33.9 5.53 5.80 2165 5477 2.08<br />

T 3: 100% RDF NPK 85.9 2.1 37.1 6.07 6.20 2289 6043 2.14<br />

T 4: 125% RDF NPK 87.5 2.4 37.4 6.13 6.33 2602 6787 2.36<br />

T 5: 150% RDF NPK 91.3 2.6 40.7 6.53 5.93 2830 7385 2.48<br />

T 6: T1+ 1% KNO 3 spray 84.0 2.1 35.6 6.03 6.13 2189 5582 2.10<br />

T 7: T2+ 1% KNO 3 spray 85.5 2.3 37.9 6.00 6.27 2244 5746 2.08<br />

T 8: T3+ 1% KNO 3 spray 86.2 2.5 35.9 6.13 6.33 2389 6163 2.15<br />

T 9: T4+ 1% KNO 3 spray 89.2 2.5 37.0 6.48 6.37 2778 7222 2.42<br />

T 10: T5+ 1% KNO 3 spray 89.8 2.7 37.6 6.79 6.40 2981 7811 2.53<br />

Mean 86.3 2.27 36.7 6.07 6.12 2461 6354<br />

SEm± 3.25 0.20 1.72 0.27 0.36 128.8 333.2<br />

C.D. (0.05) NS 0.38 NS 0.58 NS 372.6 963.7<br />

C.V. (%) 6.52 15.4 8.14 7.71 10.28 9.07 9.08<br />

* Significant at 0.05<br />

T4a-41P-1304<br />

Partial Substitution <strong>of</strong> Nutrients through Gliricidia Green Manuring under<br />

Conservation Tillage, a Cost-Effective Alternative for Soil Quality, Productivity<br />

and Economic Sustainability in Rainfed Cotton in Vertisols <strong>of</strong> Central India<br />

B. A. Sonune*, V. K. Kharche, V. V. Gabhane, S. D. Jadhao, S. M. Bhoyar, D. V. Mali,<br />

D. N. Nalge and R. N. Katkar<br />

Dr. Panjabrao Deshmukh Krishi Vidyapeeth, Akola- 444 104(Maharashtra)<br />

*basonune@gmail.com<br />

Cotton is one <strong>of</strong> the important cash crops and plays a vital role in the economy <strong>of</strong> the farmer as<br />

well as the country. Vidarbha is a major cotton and cotton-based cropping system growing<br />

region in central India where it is grown predominantly as a rainfed crop on medium to deep<br />

Vertisols. The low content <strong>of</strong> soil organic carbon in Vertisols in addition to low availability <strong>of</strong> N,<br />

P, and Zn resulted in unsustainable productivity <strong>of</strong> cotton and cotton–based cropping systems<br />

(Blaise et al. 2005) thereby deteriorating soil health. In the present conditions, the continuously<br />

659 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

increasing prices <strong>of</strong> fertilizers made it necessary to minimize the expenses on fertilizers by using<br />

alternative sources like farmyard manure, crop residues, and green manuring along with reduced<br />

tillage practices for sustaining the crop yields and soil fertility. These practices not only increase<br />

crop yield but also improve the physical, chemical, and biological properties <strong>of</strong> soil. When<br />

integrated nutrient management through chemical fertilizers and different organic sources is<br />

applied on a long-term basis, they show a beneficial impact on soil quality (Swarup 2010). As<br />

the availability <strong>of</strong> FYM is scarce and it becomes necessary to find out suitable alternative<br />

sources in the form <strong>of</strong> organic, the present study was carried out to assess the partial substitution<br />

<strong>of</strong> gliricidia green manuring, crop residues, and FYM under conservation and conventional<br />

tillage on cotton productivity, pr<strong>of</strong>itability, and soil quality in Vertisols.<br />

Methodology<br />

The present study was conducted at the research farm <strong>of</strong> the Department <strong>of</strong> Soil Science and<br />

Agril. Chemistry, Dr. Panjabrao Deshmukh Krishi Vidyapeeth, Akola during 2011-12 to 15-16<br />

to assess the integrated effect <strong>of</strong> tillage practices, organic sources, and chemical fertilizers on<br />

productivity, the pr<strong>of</strong>itability <strong>of</strong> rainfed cotton and fertility <strong>of</strong> Vertisol. The experiment<br />

comprised eight treatments including 100 % recommended dose <strong>of</strong> fertilizers (60:30:30 NPK kg<br />

ha -1 ) and the various combinations integrating 50 and 25% N through FYM, wheat straw,<br />

gliricidia green leaf manuring, and compensation <strong>of</strong> RDF to cotton. The experiment was laid out<br />

in randomized block design with two sets <strong>of</strong> conditions namely, conservation and conventional<br />

tillage replicated thrice. The experimental soil was clay in texture, deep to very deep, and<br />

classified as Typic Haplusterts (Vertisol), moderately alkaline in reaction, low in available N,<br />

medium in P, and high in available potassium.<br />

Results<br />

The pooled results revealed that the application <strong>of</strong> 50 % N through FYM + compensation <strong>of</strong> RDF<br />

through chemical fertilizers recorded significantly highest seed cotton yield (13.54 q ha -1 ) which was at<br />

par with the application <strong>of</strong> 50 % N through GLM + compensation <strong>of</strong> RDF through chemical fertilizers<br />

(12.94 q ha -1 ). A significant increase in seed cotton yield was observed under conservation tillage as<br />

compared to conventional tillage. The higher SYI (0.71) was observed with the application <strong>of</strong> 50% N<br />

through FYM + remaining RD through chemical fertilizers followed by 50% N through GLM +<br />

remaining RD through chemical fertilizers (0.68). The lower SYI was observed in 100 % RDF through<br />

chemical fertilizers. The highest NMR and B: C ratio (Rs. 23,656 ha -1 & 2.09) was obtained due to the<br />

application <strong>of</strong> 50 % N through GLM + compensation <strong>of</strong> RDF through chemical fertilizers. The<br />

significant improvement in the physical properties <strong>of</strong> soil was noticed due to the application <strong>of</strong> 50 % N<br />

through GLM + compensation <strong>of</strong> RDF through chemical fertilizers which was at par with the<br />

660 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

application <strong>of</strong> 50 % N through FYM + compensation <strong>of</strong> RDF through chemical fertilizers. A<br />

significantly higher improvement in soil physical properties was observed under conservation tillage<br />

compared to conventional tillage. The soil organic carbon was increased to the tune <strong>of</strong> 10.68 and 6.25<br />

% over the initial value (5.6 g kg -1 ) with 50 % N through FYM + remaining compensation RDF<br />

through chemical fertilizers and 50 % through GLM + remaining compensation RDF through chemical<br />

fertilizers, respectively. The residual soil fertility was significantly higher under the application <strong>of</strong> 50<br />

% N through GLM + compensation <strong>of</strong> RDF through chemical fertilizers which was at par with the<br />

application <strong>of</strong> 50 % N through FYM + compensation <strong>of</strong> RDF through chemical fertilizers. The<br />

application <strong>of</strong> 50 % N through GLM + compensation <strong>of</strong> RDF through chemical fertilizers recorded<br />

significant improvement in biological properties (SMBC, SMBN, and DHA) <strong>of</strong> soil which was on par<br />

with the application <strong>of</strong> 50 % N through FYM + compensation <strong>of</strong> RDF through chemical fertilizers. A<br />

significant increase in the biological properties <strong>of</strong> soil was observed under conservation tillage as<br />

compared to conventional tillage. The SQI was improved with the application <strong>of</strong> 50% N through FYM<br />

and the remaining RD through chemical fertilizers (2.29). The SQI was comparatively lower in 100%<br />

RDF indicating the application <strong>of</strong> RDF alone could not maintain soil quality and as a result, seed<br />

cotton and cotton stalk yield was reduced in Vertisols. The compensation <strong>of</strong> chemical fertilizers<br />

through various organic sources viz., gliricidia green leaf manuring, and green manuring with sunhemp<br />

and wheat straw were found equally effective in maintaining higher SQI.<br />

Conclusion<br />

The results <strong>of</strong> the present study indicate that continuous application <strong>of</strong> 50 % N through FYM with<br />

remaining RD from mineral fertilizers sustained the cotton productivity and SYI index with<br />

improvement in soil properties. However, the substitution <strong>of</strong> 50 % N through gliricidia green leaf<br />

manuring with remaining RD from chemical fertilizers was found equally beneficial for sustaining<br />

cotton productivity, SYI, improvement in soil health as well as enhancing net returns <strong>of</strong> cotton in<br />

rainfed Vertisols <strong>of</strong> semi-arid climatic conditions in Central India.<br />

References<br />

Blaise, D., Majumdar, G. and Tekale, K.U. 2005. On-farm evaluation <strong>of</strong> fertilizer application and<br />

conservation tillage on productivity <strong>of</strong> cotton + pigeonpea strip intercropping on rainfed<br />

Vertisols <strong>of</strong> Central India. Soil Till. Res.84: 108-117.<br />

Swarup, Anand 2010. Integrated plant nutrient supply and management strategies for enhancing<br />

soil quality, input use efficiency and crop productivity. J. Indian Soc. Soil Sci.58:25-31.<br />

661 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Effect <strong>of</strong> tillage and integrated nutrient management on productivity, pr<strong>of</strong>itability <strong>of</strong><br />

rainfed cotton<br />

(a) Tillage<br />

Cotton yield<br />

(q ha -1 )<br />

Seed<br />

Cotton<br />

Cotton<br />

Stalk<br />

SYI<br />

NMR<br />

(Rs.<br />

ha -1 )<br />

B:C<br />

ratio<br />

BD<br />

(Mg<br />

m -3 )<br />

HC<br />

(cm hr -<br />

1 )<br />

MWD<br />

OC<br />

(g kg -1 )<br />

Conservation tillage 12.49 29.22 0.61 19105 1.82 1.35 0.72 0.70 5.86<br />

Conventional tillage 11.73 26.33 0.61 14185 1.56 1.35 0.70 0.66 5.74<br />

SE (m) 0.13 0.22 --- 393 0.01 0.01 0.006 0.007 0.04<br />

CD at 5 % 0.39 0.65 -- 1152 0.04 NS 0.017 0.021 0.11<br />

T1-100% RDF 11.19 25.95 0.55 19429 2.02 1.37 0.65 0.64 5.53<br />

T2-50 % RDF + in situ GM 11.68 27.44 0.61 19917 1.96 1.36 0.69 0.69 5.93<br />

T3-50% N through FYM 13.54 31.79 0.71 15694 1.49 1.31 0.77 0.73 6.17<br />

T4-50% N through WS 11.89 26.73 0.62 11604 1.38 1.36 0.74 0.68 5.84<br />

T5-50% N through GLM 12.94 28.63 0.68 23656 2.09 1.34 0.74 0.70 5.95<br />

T6-25% N through FYM +<br />

25% N through WS<br />

T7-25% N through FYM +<br />

25% N through GLM<br />

T8-25% N through WS + 25%<br />

N through GLM<br />

11.94 27.42<br />

11.95 27.23<br />

11.76 27.02<br />

0.58 11604 1.37<br />

0.60 15709 1.60<br />

0.57 15545 1.60<br />

1.36 0.70 0.67 5.68<br />

1.34 0.70 0.68 5.68<br />

1.36 0.69 0.64 5.63<br />

SE (m) 0.27 0.44 -- 785 0.01 0.01 0.014 0.08<br />

CD at 5 % 0.78 1.28 -- 2304 0.04 0.03 0.042 0.22<br />

(c)Interaction effect NS NS NS NS NS NS<br />

Note: In T3 to T8, the remaining recommended dose <strong>of</strong> fertilizer was compensated through<br />

chemical fertilizers, in T2 in situ green manurings was done through sunhemp<br />

T4a-42P-1047<br />

Performance <strong>of</strong> Castor to Different Levels <strong>of</strong> Nitrogen and Phosphorus under<br />

Conserved Soil Moisture in Ghed Area <strong>of</strong> Gujarat<br />

D. S. Hirpara * , R. B. Thanki, V. D. Vora, S. C. Kaneriya and P. D. Vekariya<br />

Main Dry Farming Research Station, Junagadh Agricultural University, Gujarat, 360 023 India<br />

*dshirpara@jau.in<br />

Castor (Racinus communis) is an important non-edible oilseed crop <strong>of</strong> the arid and semi arid<br />

regions <strong>of</strong> India due to its extensive deep root system and can be grown successfully under<br />

rainfed or irrigated conditions. India, Brazil and China are the most important castor growing<br />

countries in the World. India is the global leader in the production and trade <strong>of</strong> castor having<br />

662 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

7.51 lakh hectare area and 11.97 lakh tonnes production with a productivity <strong>of</strong> 1592 kg/ha during<br />

2019 (FAOSTAT, 2019). Gujarat is the largest castor growing state <strong>of</strong> India. Where, it’s grown<br />

over an area <strong>of</strong> 5.22 lakh hectare with the annual production <strong>of</strong> 9.44 lakh tonnes with average<br />

productivity <strong>of</strong> about 1809 kg/ha and its shares about 69.46% <strong>of</strong> the total area and 78.90% <strong>of</strong> the<br />

total castor production. Cultivation <strong>of</strong> castor on conserved soil moisture in Ghed area <strong>of</strong> Gujarat<br />

is increased day by day. While, castor is drought tolerant plant and can be grown on wide<br />

climatic regimes and is an ideal crop for arid and semi-arid zones with humid climate (Falasca et<br />

al., 2012), proper planting geometry (Thanki et al., 2020) and the availability <strong>of</strong> balanced<br />

nutrients is very necessary for high yield. Therefore, it is prime need to find out appropriate dose<br />

<strong>of</strong> nitrogen and phosphorus for castor grown under conserved moisture in Ghed area <strong>of</strong> Gujarat.<br />

Hence, an experiment was planned to study the effect <strong>of</strong> nitrogen and phosphorus on castor yield<br />

under conserved soil moisture in Ghed area.<br />

Methodology<br />

A field experiment was conducted during the Semi-rabi season <strong>of</strong> 2015 to 2019 at Dry Farming<br />

Research Station, Junagadh Agricultural University, Ratia (Porbandar). The soil <strong>of</strong> experimental<br />

field was medium black clayey having pH 8.26, EC 0.41 dS m -1 and organic carbon 0.52 %. The<br />

soil was medium in available nitrogen (255 kg/ha), medium in available phosphorus (43.27<br />

kg/ha) and high in available potash (690.0 kg/ha). The experiment was laid out in a factorial<br />

randomized block design with 12 treatments. 4 levels <strong>of</strong> nitrogen (0, 20, 40 and 60 kg/ha) and 3<br />

levels <strong>of</strong> phosphorus (0, 20 and 40 kg/ha) with 3 replications. The nitrogen was applied in two<br />

splits viz., 50 % as basal through ammonium sulphate and 50 % as top dressing at 45-50 DAS<br />

through urea by drilling in soil up to 10 cm depth, while phosphorus was applied as basal<br />

through single super phosphate as per treatments. The Gross and net plot size was 5.4 m X 4.5 m<br />

and 3.6 m X 2.7 m, respectively. Castor GCH-7 was sown at the distance <strong>of</strong> 90 cm X 45 cm on<br />

27 August 2015, 24 October 2016, 27 October 2017, 19 September 2018 and 9 November 2019<br />

under conserved soil moisture. The total rainfall received during the crop season (June to<br />

November) was 180, 306, 270, 149 and 545 mm in 6, 12, 14, 8 and 18 rainy days in the year <strong>of</strong><br />

2015 2016, 2017, 2018 and 2019, respectively. Data on growth, yield performance and economic<br />

<strong>of</strong> castor was pooled over 5 years.<br />

Results<br />

On the basis <strong>of</strong> five years pooled mean, seed and stalk yield <strong>of</strong> castor were significantly<br />

influenced due to different levels <strong>of</strong> nitrogen and phosphorus, while plant height was found nonsignificant<br />

(Table). Significantly highest seed yield and stalk yield <strong>of</strong> castor were recorded with<br />

application <strong>of</strong> 60 kg N/ha as compared to control, 20 and 40 kg N/ha. Among phosphorus levels,<br />

663 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

application <strong>of</strong> 40 kg P2O5/ha recorded significantly highest seed and stalk yield <strong>of</strong> castor as<br />

compared to control, but it was at par with application <strong>of</strong> 20 kg P2O5/ha. Similarly maximum net<br />

returns <strong>of</strong> Rs. 10081/ha and B: C ratio <strong>of</strong> 1.51 were recorded with application <strong>of</strong> 60 kg N/ha.<br />

While among phosphorus levels, maximum net returns <strong>of</strong> Rs. 7814/ha and B: C ratio <strong>of</strong> 1.40<br />

were recorded with 40 kg P2O5/ha followed by Rs. 7109/ha and B: C ratio <strong>of</strong> 1.37 with<br />

application <strong>of</strong> 20 kg P2O5/ha.<br />

Growth, yield and economics <strong>of</strong> castor as influenced by nitrogen and phosphorus levels<br />

under conserved soil moisture (Pooled mean <strong>of</strong> 5 years)<br />

Treatments<br />

Nitrogen (kg/ha)<br />

Phosphorus (kg/ha)<br />

Conclusion<br />

On the basis <strong>of</strong> five years pooled results, it can concluded that higher seed yield and net returns<br />

from castor (GCH-7) can be obtained with application <strong>of</strong> 60 kg N and 40 kg P2O5/ha in medium<br />

black clayey soil under conserved soil moisture in Ghed area <strong>of</strong> Gujarat.<br />

References<br />

Falasca, S. L., Ulberich, A. C., and Ulberich, E., 2012. Developing an agro-climatic zoning<br />

model to determine potential production areas for castor bean (Ricinus communis L.). Ind.<br />

Crops and Prod. 40, 185-191.<br />

Plant height<br />

(cm)<br />

Seed<br />

yield<br />

(kg/ha)<br />

Stalk<br />

yield<br />

(kg/ha)<br />

Net<br />

return<br />

( /ha)<br />

B:C ratio<br />

Control 56.4 597 1242 3947 1.21<br />

20 59.1 647 1309 5372 1.28<br />

40 60.2 731 1461 7993 1.41<br />

60 60.8 799 1631 10081 1.51<br />

SEm+ 1.5 18 44<br />

CD (P=0.05) NS 54 136<br />

Control 58.0 648 1340 5604 1.30<br />

20 59.4 701 1423 7109 1.37<br />

40 60.0 731 1471 7814 1.40<br />

SEm+ 0.7 11 23<br />

CD (P=0.05) NS 49 124<br />

664 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

FAOSTAT. 2019. Statistical databases and data-sets <strong>of</strong> the Food and Agriculture Organization <strong>of</strong><br />

the United Nations [Available at URL: http://faostat.fao.org; accessed on 1 st June, 2021].<br />

Thanki, R. B., Hirpara, D. S., Vora, V. D., Vekariya, P. D., Jotangiya, K. S., Vadar, H. R., Kaneria,<br />

S. C. and Modhavadiya, V. L. (2020). Effect <strong>of</strong> plant geometry on castor under conserved<br />

moisture condition at Ratia (Ghed), Gujarat. J. Pharmacogon. and Phytochem, Sp. 9, (5):<br />

831-833.<br />

T4a-43P-1289<br />

Performance <strong>of</strong> Maize (Zea mays) under late Planting Conditions in Organic<br />

Production Mode in the Rainfed Condition <strong>of</strong> Meghalaya<br />

Amit A. Shahane and U. K. Behera<br />

College <strong>of</strong> Agriculture (CAU-I), Kyrdemkulai, Meghalaya, India, 793105<br />

Maize (Zea mays) has bright prospects in Meghalaya state due to its significant role in catering to<br />

the need for animal feed requirement both in green form as forage, dry form as fodder, and use <strong>of</strong><br />

grains in preparation <strong>of</strong> concentration. The farming system in Meghalaya in particular and North<br />

East Hill region in general is animal based. Most <strong>of</strong> these animals need feed in large quantities.<br />

Maize can be a dual crop with the introduction <strong>of</strong> baby corn and sweet corn providing a good<br />

source <strong>of</strong> green fodder along with economic productivity. Besides that, crop productivity is<br />

conditioned by several factors such as nutrient sensitivity considering its high productivity and<br />

nutrient requirement, and water sensitivity due to its susceptibility to waterlogging and deficit<br />

water stress. Meeting these requirements in the organic production system in areas with higher<br />

rainfall is challenging. In Meghalaya, the organic production system is commonly followed, and<br />

average rainfall varies between 2119 mm to 6019 mm per annum. Considering this, it needs to<br />

access the potential <strong>of</strong> maize for nutrient and water stress with organic sources <strong>of</strong> crop nutrition.<br />

With this background, a field experiment was planned to study the growth repose <strong>of</strong> maize to the<br />

application <strong>of</strong> Pongamia oilseed cake and poultry manure in acidic soil with an organic<br />

production system in late planting conditions.<br />

Methodology<br />

A field experiment was conducted at the Instructional Farm <strong>of</strong> the College <strong>of</strong> Agriculture (CAU-<br />

I), Kyrdemkulai, Meghalaya (25 0 74’ N latitude, 91 0 81’ E longitude and 700 meters above mean<br />

sea level) in the Kharif season <strong>of</strong> 2021-22. The climate <strong>of</strong> the selected area is subtropical with<br />

average seasonal (June to September) and annual rainfall <strong>of</strong> 1424.1 mm and 2119.3 mm,<br />

respectively. The study was planned in randomized block design with 11 treatments consisting <strong>of</strong><br />

665 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

two sources <strong>of</strong> crop nutrition viz., poultry manure and Pongamia oilseed cake, three level <strong>of</strong> crop<br />

nutrition 25 %, 50%, and 100 % recommended dose <strong>of</strong> nitrogen (120 kg N/ha) and their various<br />

combinations. The land was cleared <strong>of</strong>f from forest vegetation in 2019 and sown with oat (Avena<br />

sativa) in the rabi season <strong>of</strong> 2019; while in 2020-21 field was planted with a Maize–Pea–Linseed<br />

cropping system. Maize variety DA-61-A was used while the crop was grown as rainfed. For<br />

recording the observations, plant population was counted two times (60 DAS and at harvest);<br />

while plants with tassel and cob were counted at harvest. Three plants from each plot were<br />

randomly selected for dry matter partitioning measurement and separated into stem, leaf, root,<br />

tassel, and cob. The dry matter accumulation in these parts was measured by sun drying followed<br />

by oven drying at 60 ± 2 0 C temperature till constant weight was achieved.<br />

Results<br />

Plant population both at 60 DAS and at harvest was reduced drastically. At 60 days after sowing,<br />

the mortality percentage varies between 36 to 68 %; while at harvest, it varies from 46 to 72 %.<br />

In both cases, plant mortality was highest in control and lowest in poultry manure (100 % N) +<br />

Pongamia cake (50 % N) indicating the nutrient stress as one potential reason. The development<br />

<strong>of</strong> a strong root system and foliage and the increase in strength <strong>of</strong> plants to stresses are the<br />

possible reasons for reduced mortality in manure-applied treatments. This higher mortality<br />

indicates that, though the window <strong>of</strong> sowing maize is considered wider, the crop performance is<br />

not uniform across the window <strong>of</strong> sowing. At the same time, plant stresses affecting crop growth<br />

also vary across the window. Besides survival, the plant’s capacity to attend the reproductive<br />

growth is also affected significantly by both planting time and nutrient endowments. Out <strong>of</strong> the<br />

total plants that survived, 71–94% bear tassel; while 50–68 % bear cob. If expressed as a percent<br />

<strong>of</strong> the expected ideal plant population, then 20–48 % and 14–28 % <strong>of</strong> plants bear tassel and cob,<br />

respectively. Late planting leads to plant mortality and the application <strong>of</strong> manure is having to<br />

alleviate the effect on plant mortality. The impact <strong>of</strong> sowing time on the growth and productivity<br />

<strong>of</strong> maize was reported by Srivastava et al. (2022); while Ghosh et al. (2020) signifies the role <strong>of</strong><br />

manure application in crop growth. Plant height and dry matter partitioning were affected<br />

significantly due to both late planting and manure application rate; while the source <strong>of</strong> manure<br />

application didn’t show any significant variation in plant growth and development. The dry<br />

matter production at harvest varies from 21.3 to 42.0 g/plant with the highest and lowest in PM<br />

(100 % N) + Pongamia cake (50 % N) and control, respectively. The increase in the total dry<br />

matter at harvest due to the application <strong>of</strong> 25 %, 50 %, and 100 % poultry manure over control in<br />

6.5, 13.8, and 19.8 g/plant, respectively; while the same for Pongamia cake is 6.7, 13.4, and 19.7<br />

g/plant. The combined application <strong>of</strong> PM (50 % N) + Pongamia cake (50 % N) and PM (100 %<br />

N) + Pongamia cake (100 % N) remain on par in total dry matter production at harvest,<br />

666 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

indicating that, a higher rate <strong>of</strong> manure application will not be a viable option for alleviating the<br />

effect <strong>of</strong> reducing the stress raised due to late planting; while splitting <strong>of</strong> nutrient application<br />

across the crop growth cycle and attempt for reducing the mortality <strong>of</strong> plant by earthing up, gap<br />

filling and protection <strong>of</strong> seed being eaten by soil insect by treating with biodynamic formulation<br />

need to be stressed. Out <strong>of</strong> total dry matter accumulation, 46.2 – 48.6 % is accumulated in cobs;<br />

while 19.6 – 22.0 % is accumulated in shoots and both contribute 67 – 68 % to the total dry<br />

matter accumulation.<br />

Conclusion<br />

Our result showed that the application <strong>of</strong> manure higher than 100 % N (120 kg N/ha) do not<br />

produce any significantly higher growth; while increasing the rate <strong>of</strong> application from 25 to 100<br />

% significantly increase the dry matter production in all part <strong>of</strong> the plant at harvest. Application<br />

<strong>of</strong> manure through different sources (poultry manure and Pongamia cake) and their combinations<br />

do not show any significant effect on the growth and survival <strong>of</strong> maize.<br />

References<br />

Srivastava, R.K., Mequanint, F., Chakraborty, A., Panda, R.K. and Halder, D. 2022.<br />

Augmentation <strong>of</strong> maize yield by strategic adaptation to cope with climate change for a<br />

future period in Eastern India. J. Clean. Prod. 339:130599,<br />

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.130599.<br />

Ghosh, D., Brahmachari, K., Skalicky, M., Hossain, A., Sarkar, S., Dinda, N.K., Das, A.,<br />

Pramanick, B., Moulick, D., Brestic, M., and Raza, M.A. 2020. Nutrient supplementation<br />

through organic manures influence the growth <strong>of</strong> weeds and maize productivity. Molecules,<br />

25(21): 4924, https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25214924.<br />

T4a-44P -1155<br />

Response <strong>of</strong> Soybean (Glycine Max (L).) to the Organic Sources <strong>of</strong> Nutrients<br />

A. K. Gore, A. K. Kadam, P. O. Bhutada and S. A. Jawale<br />

Organic Farming Research and Training Centre, Vasantrao Naik Marathwada Krishi Vidyapeeth,<br />

Parbhani - 431402 (Maharashtra) India<br />

<strong>of</strong>rtcvnmkvparbhani@gmail.com<br />

Soybean is important kharif crop in rainfed areas <strong>of</strong>Marathwada region, where 87 % area is<br />

under rainfed condition. The crop has ability to fix atmospheric nitrogen through the symbiotic<br />

bacteria called Rhizobia within the nodules <strong>of</strong> their root systems as it belongs to leguminceae<br />

family. The microbiology <strong>of</strong> the soil is interrelated with the organic carbon content <strong>of</strong> the soil.<br />

667 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Due to want <strong>of</strong> improvement in soil health and production <strong>of</strong> residue free food, organic sources<br />

<strong>of</strong> nutrients are intentionally being used by farmers in recent past. Application <strong>of</strong> organic<br />

manures has direct effect on the crop yield and properties <strong>of</strong> soil. Keeping this in view, a field<br />

experiment was conducted to evaluate locally available organic sources <strong>of</strong> nutrients in terms <strong>of</strong><br />

yield <strong>of</strong> soybean crop (Aheret al. 2019).<br />

Methodology<br />

An experiment was conducted at Organic Farming Research and Training Centre, Vasantrao<br />

Naik Marathwada Krishi Vidyapeeth Parbhani, during kharif 2018-19. The experiment design<br />

was RBD for thirteen treatments with three replications with gross plot size <strong>of</strong> 7.2 m x 6.0 mand<br />

net plot size <strong>of</strong> 6.3 m x 5.4 m and with 45 x 05 cm spacing.<br />

Results<br />

Soybean yield was determined by the development <strong>of</strong> the plant from the beginning <strong>of</strong> sowing to<br />

the harvest period, where the role <strong>of</strong> fertilization was <strong>of</strong> great importance. Application <strong>of</strong><br />

different organic and chemical fertilizers would affect one or all <strong>of</strong> its yield components. Among<br />

nutrient source applications, the chemical fertilizer as RDF with FYMthe treatment, T13 i.e. RDF<br />

+ FYM @ 5 t ha -1 recorded the highest soybean yield which was found significantly superior<br />

over rest <strong>of</strong> the treatments. However, use <strong>of</strong> organic sources <strong>of</strong> nutrient affected soybean yield<br />

and data revealed that, the effect <strong>of</strong> various organic sources on soybean yield was found to be<br />

significant. Among various organic sources <strong>of</strong> nutrients, the treatment T2 i.e.100 % RDN through<br />

Vermi compost recorded highest soybean yield (1546 Kg ha -1. Similar trend was observed in<br />

GMR, NMR and B:C ratio i.e. T13 i.e. RDF + FYM 5 t ha -1 recorded the highest GMR, NMR and<br />

B:C ratio. However, among various sources <strong>of</strong> nutrients the treatmentT2 i.e. 100 % RDN through<br />

Vermicompost recorded the higher seed yield <strong>of</strong> soybean with higher GMR, NMR and B:C ratio<br />

than rest <strong>of</strong> the treatments. Similar trend was observed and reported by Channabasavana et al.,<br />

2001. The treatments had RWUE <strong>of</strong> more than one except the control plotsand it was found<br />

highest in treatment T13 followed by T2. The positive effects <strong>of</strong> organic manure application on<br />

performance <strong>of</strong> soybean and other crops in black soils are well documented by Aher et al. 2015.<br />

668 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Soybean crop yield, monetary returns, B:C ratio and rain water use efficiency as<br />

influenced by different treatments.<br />

Treatments<br />

Soybea<br />

n Yield<br />

(Kg/ha)<br />

GMR<br />

(₹/ha)<br />

NMR<br />

(₹/ha)<br />

B:C<br />

ratio<br />

RWUE<br />

(kg/mm<br />

/ha)<br />

T 1: 100 % RDN through FYM 954 32438 3838 1.13 1.70<br />

T 2: 100 % RDN through Vermicompost (VC) 1546 52549 13749 1.35 2.75<br />

T 3: 100 % RDN through 33% FYM + 33% VC + 33%<br />

NC<br />

1337 45433 9666 1.27 2.38<br />

T 4: 100 % RDN: FYM + JA 3 at 30, 45 & 60 DAS 1204 40930 9780 1.31 2.14<br />

T 5: 75 % RDN: FYM + JA 3 at 30, 45 & 60 DAS 1055 35843 5893 1.20 1.87<br />

T 6: 50 % RDN: FYM + JA 3 at 30, 45 & 60 DAS 899 30573 1823 1.06 1.60<br />

T 7: 100 % RDN: FYM + Bio fertilizer 2.5 lit/ha (SA) 1123 38182 8487 1.29 2.00<br />

T 8: 75 % RDN: FYM + Bio fertilizer 2.5 lit/ha (SA) 995 33837 5342 1.19 1.77<br />

T 9: 50 % RDN: FYM + Bio fertilizer 2.5 lit/ha (SA) 874 29717 2422 1.09 1.55<br />

T 10: Jivamrut 3 Appln at 30, 45 & 60 DAS 849 28850 2110 1.08 1.51<br />

T 11: Jivamrut 5 Appln at 0, 15, 30, 45 & 60 DAS 926 31472 2772 1.10 1.65<br />

T 12: Control (Without any application) 723 24586 786 1.03 1.29<br />

T 13: RDF + 5 t FYM/ha 2233 75900 43897 2.37 3.97<br />

SE(m) + 70.26 823.7 213.4 -- --<br />

CD at 5% 210.5 2279 638.2 -- --<br />

Mean 1132 38485 8505 1.27 2.01<br />

CV 10.2 9.80 11.2 -- --<br />

Conclusion<br />

Among the nutrient source applications, the chemical fertilizer as RDF with FYM, treatment T13<br />

i.e. RDF + FYM @ 5 t ha -1 recorded the highest soybean yield, GMR, NMR and B:C ratio and<br />

was found significantly superior over rest <strong>of</strong> the treatments. Whereas, among various organic<br />

sources <strong>of</strong> nutrients, treatment T2 i.e.100 % RDN through Vermicompost recorded highest<br />

soybean yield (1546 Kg ha), GMR, NMR and B:C ratio.<br />

669 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

References<br />

Aher, S. B., Lakaria, B. L., Swami, K., Singh, A. B., Ramana, S., Ramesh, K and Thakur, J. K.<br />

2015. Effect <strong>of</strong> organic farming practices on soil and performance <strong>of</strong> soybean (Glycine<br />

max (L.)) under semiarid tropical conditions in central India. Journal <strong>of</strong> Applied and<br />

Natural Science. 7(1): 67–71.<br />

Channabasavana, A.S., Yelamadi, S.G., Biradar, D.P. 2001. Effect <strong>of</strong> organics on seed yield,<br />

quality and storability <strong>of</strong> soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merril). Indian Journal <strong>of</strong> Agronomy<br />

2001.46(33):458-461<br />

Aher, S .B., Brij Lal Lakaria, Singh, A. B. Swami Kaleshananda, Ramana, S., Ramesh, K.,<br />

Thakur, J. K., Rajput, P. S and Yashona, D. S. 2019. Effect <strong>of</strong> organic sources <strong>of</strong><br />

nutrients on performance <strong>of</strong> soybean (glycine max). Indian journal <strong>of</strong> agricultural<br />

sciences. 89 (11): 1787–91.<br />

T4a-45P-1230<br />

Soil Moisture Availability in Alfisol as Influenced by Crop Residue<br />

Application under Minimum Tillage<br />

K. Sammi Reddy, Munna Lal, K. L. Sharma, M. Eshwar, K. Srinivas, A. K. Indoria, and<br />

V. K. Singh<br />

ICAR-Central Research institute for Dryland Agriculture, Santoshnagar, Saidabad Post, Hyderabad –<br />

500059 (T.S.)<br />

The water-holding capacity <strong>of</strong> a soil in a particular place depends on the depth <strong>of</strong> the soil, the<br />

volume <strong>of</strong> pore-spaces, and the proportion <strong>of</strong> the voids that retain water against the pull <strong>of</strong><br />

gravity. In a sandy soil, there is relatively large total volume <strong>of</strong> pore space among the large<br />

mineral particles, but the majority <strong>of</strong> the pores are so large that rainwater drains through most <strong>of</strong><br />

them, and relatively little is retained within the pr<strong>of</strong>ile. In clayey soils, the opposite can be<br />

expected. There may be a large proportion <strong>of</strong> small pore-spaces and while percolating rainwater<br />

may enter partly under capillary action, but the water cannot drain out and can only be removed<br />

by plant roots and/ or by slow evaporation into any air-filled spaces within the soil. In very<br />

compact clay soils, both entry and exit <strong>of</strong> rainwater may be very slow (Indoria et al., 2017). The<br />

presence <strong>of</strong> additional plant residue on the soil surface is one <strong>of</strong> the most prominent features <strong>of</strong><br />

conservation tillage systems when compared with conventional tillage. The surface residue<br />

affects the absorption <strong>of</strong> solar radiation, and decreases the thermal admittance <strong>of</strong> the surface<br />

relative to that <strong>of</strong> bare soil. Soil water storage at many semi-arid locations increased with<br />

670 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

increasing amounts <strong>of</strong> crop residue maintained on the surface (Sharma et al., 1990). Greater<br />

infiltration, less evaporation, and effective weed control contributed to the higher soil water<br />

contents with conservation tillage.<br />

Methodology<br />

To achieve the objective, an experiment with surface application <strong>of</strong> 4 levels <strong>of</strong> sorghum residues<br />

@ 0, 2, 4, 6 t ha -1 in combination with N (30 kg N ha -1 for cowpea and 60 kg N ha -1 for Sorghum<br />

through urea) and uniform dose <strong>of</strong> 30 kg P2O5 ha -1 (through super phosphate) with minimum<br />

tillage, was initiated during 2005 at ICAR-CRIDA Research farm Hayathnagar, Hyderabad. The<br />

cropping system adopted in this study was Sorghum-Cowpea with yearly rotation. The soil<br />

moisture was measured using Soil Moisture Meter (Micro Gopher, Nu-Tech). Soil moisture were<br />

recorded in treatment plots at 8 depths viz., 0-10 cm, 10-20cm, 20-30 cm 30-40 cm, 40-50cm,<br />

50-60 cm, 60-70 cm, 70-80cm. Soil moisture at field capacity (1/3 bars) and permanent wilting<br />

point (15 bars) was measured using pressure plate apparatus. The difference in soil moisture at<br />

field capacity and permanent wilting point was recorded as soil available moisture.<br />

Results<br />

Soil Moisture: It was observed that, during the crop season (June-September), on an average, the<br />

soil moisture at 0-10 cm depth varied from 11.2 to 16.6% across the treatments. The increase in<br />

soil moisture at 0-10 cm depth was 18%, 25%, 49%, with 2, 4 and 6 t ha -1 residue treatments<br />

respectively over control. The soil moisture contents increased with increase in level <strong>of</strong><br />

application <strong>of</strong> residues in all the depths studied (0-80cm). The results pertaining to the effect <strong>of</strong><br />

residue application on soil moisture % (January- April) are given hereunder (Fig.1). It was<br />

observed that the residue applied @ 6t ha -1 (T4) recorded higher soil moisture content at all the<br />

depths studied. At 0-10 cm depth, application <strong>of</strong> residues at 6t ha -1 resulted in highest moisture<br />

storage in the soil compared to other treatments after the harvest <strong>of</strong> the crop. The treatments @ 2,<br />

4 and 6 t ha -1 , on an average recorded 25%, 34% and 57% higher soil moisture contents<br />

respectively over control. It was observed that at 10-20 cm soil depth, on an average, soil<br />

moisture was lower compared to surface soil. At this depth, the residue treated plots stored 27%,<br />

51% and 78% higher moisture compared to no residue treatment. On an average, at 20-30 cm<br />

depth also, residues influenced soil moisture storage. The treatments viz T2, T3 and T4<br />

maintained 47%, 58% and 80% higher soil moisture compared to control. During the first three<br />

weeks and between 11-13 th meteorological weeks, there was no receipt <strong>of</strong> rainfall. Despite non<br />

receipt <strong>of</strong> rainfall, T4 treatment maintained higher soil moisture storage followed by T3 and T2<br />

treatments. The control treatment (no residue) stored the least amount <strong>of</strong> soil moisture.<br />

671 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Soil available moisture capacity: It was observed that soil moisture at field capacity was<br />

significantly influenced by residue treatments and varied from 10.11 to 12.94 cm m -1 .<br />

Significantly higher field capacity (12.94 cm m -1 ) was observed with application <strong>of</strong> sorghum<br />

stover @ 6t ha -1 followed by residue application at 4t ha -1 (11.25 cm m -1 ). Similarly, soil moisture<br />

at permanent wilting point varied from 6.90 to 7.45 cm m -1 . The available water content<br />

increased with the increase in the graded residue levels and it varied from 3.21 to 5.49 cm m -1 .<br />

Significantly higher available water capacity (5.49 cm m -1 ) was observed with application <strong>of</strong><br />

sorghum stover @ 6t ha -1 followed by residue application at 4t ha -1 (3.85 cm m -1 ).<br />

Relationship between soil available moisture and crop yield: In order to establish a relationship<br />

between crop yield and volumetric moisture, a simple linear regression equation was developed<br />

with yield as functional goal and soil moisture as independent variable (Fig. 3). It was observed<br />

that the regression relationship between sorghum grain yield and soil moisture was significant<br />

(p=0.01). The coefficient <strong>of</strong> regression (R 2 = 0.55) denotes that sorghum yield could be explained<br />

by volumetric soil moisture content.<br />

YSorghum yield = 1053.2 + 222.2 (Volumetric Soil Moisture) .........(R 2 = 0.55) **<br />

Conclusion<br />

Relationship between soil available moisture and crop yield<br />

The importance <strong>of</strong> long-term application <strong>of</strong> residues to soil surface in influencing soil moisture<br />

storage. The moisture data also revealed that higher amounts <strong>of</strong> residue application increased soil<br />

moisture storage even beyond 30cm soil depth. At 70-80 cm depth, T2 and T3 treatments<br />

maintained 17% and 26% higher moisture compared to control. On an average, T3 recorded 10%<br />

higher soil moisture storage compared to T2 treatment when all the soil depths were considered.<br />

672 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

The increase in available water content with higher doses <strong>of</strong> surface residue could be attributed<br />

to higher organic C, improved soil structure and consequently more water retention.<br />

References<br />

Indoria, A.K., Sharma, K L., Sammi Reddy, K. and Srinivasa Rao, Ch. 2017. Role <strong>of</strong> soil<br />

physical properties in soil health management and crop productivity in rainfed systems-I:<br />

Soil physical constraints and scope. Current Science, 112 (12):2405-2414.<br />

Sharma, P.K., Kharwara, P.C. and Tewatia, R.K. 1990. Residual soil moisture and wheat in<br />

Regins relation to mulching and tillage during preceding rainfed crop. Soil Tillage Res., 15:<br />

279 284.<br />

T4a-46P-1055<br />

Soil Moisture Stress Alters the Abundance <strong>of</strong> Maize Root Associated Bacteria<br />

M. Manjunath, N. Jyothilakshmi, S. Vijayalakshmi, S. K. Yadav, M. Prabhakar,<br />

K.A. Gopinath, G. Ravindrachary and V.K. Singh<br />

ICAR-Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, Santoshnagar, Hyderabad – 500 059,<br />

Telangana, India.<br />

Plants and microorganisms have coevolved over the years. The plant microbiome comprises <strong>of</strong><br />

rhizospheric, endophytic and epiphytic microorganisms (Rout 2014). Rhizo-microbiome<br />

significantly influences the plant health, growth and productivity (Chaudhari et al. 2020). They<br />

play a vital role in managing various biotic and abiotic stresses. Increased scarcity and<br />

competition for water has become a key threat to food security and poverty alleviation. Drought<br />

considerably changes the composition <strong>of</strong> bacterial and fungal communities indicating that, this<br />

restructured microbiome might help the plant survival under adverse environmental situations<br />

(Santos-Medellin et al. 2017). Thorough knowledge <strong>of</strong> crop specific microbiome would help to<br />

modulate the microbiome in a way that would lead to better growth and development <strong>of</strong> crop<br />

plants (Rascovan et al. 2016). Keeping this in view, a study was conducted to know the effect <strong>of</strong><br />

soil moisture stress on the composition <strong>of</strong> maize root associated bacteria.<br />

Methodology<br />

The total genomic DNA was isolated from 0.25 g soil sample using soil DNA isolation kit. Qubit<br />

4.0 Fluorimeter was used to estimate the DNA concentration. V3-V4 region <strong>of</strong> 16S rRNA<br />

amplified using V3 forward primer and V4 reverse primer. The amplified product was checked<br />

on 2% agarose gel. NEB Next Ultra DNA library preparation kit was used for library<br />

preparation. The prepared libraries were sequenced in Illumina HiSeqplatform for 2x250bp read<br />

673 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

length. Raw sequence data was merged and filtered to get clean data. De novo chimeric<br />

sequences were detected using Vsearch and only non-chimeric sequence were further used. 16S<br />

rRNA sequences were clustered into Operation Taxonomic Units (OTUs) at a similarity cut-<strong>of</strong>f<br />

value <strong>of</strong> 97% using the vsearch program (v2.11.1) and abundance <strong>of</strong> OTUs were recovered using<br />

v-search. OTUs were mapped at 97% sequence identity to an optimized version <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Ribosomal Database Project (RDP) database. Taxonomy was assigned to all identified OTUs<br />

using usearch program (v11.0.667). Sequence <strong>of</strong> OTUs were aligned using mafft (v7.407) and<br />

phylogenetic tree <strong>of</strong> identified OTUs was generated using fasttree (v 2.1.10).<br />

Results<br />

Rhizo-microbiome <strong>of</strong> well-watered and drought stressed plants <strong>of</strong>maize was analyzed by<br />

sequencing V3-V4 region <strong>of</strong> the 16S rRNA gene. Differential abundance <strong>of</strong> bacterial classes was<br />

observed between well watered and drought stressed plants. Alpha Proteobacteria,<br />

Actinobacteria, Bacilli, Beta Proteobacteria, Gamma Proteobacteria and Acidobacteria GP6 were<br />

19.53 %, 10.98 %, 16.67 %, 5.05 %, 4.52 % and 3.81 % respectively in water stressed plants. In<br />

case <strong>of</strong> well watered plants, the classes <strong>of</strong> Alpha Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria, Bacilli, Beta<br />

Proteobacteria, Gamma Proteobacteria and Acidobacteria GP6 were 8.34 %, 6.99 %, 42.09 %,<br />

4.48 %, 3.57 % and 2.07 % respectively .<br />

Differential abundance <strong>of</strong> different classes <strong>of</strong> bacteria in (a) water stressed (b) well watered maize plants<br />

Conclusion<br />

Soil moisture stress altered the relative abundance <strong>of</strong> root associated bacteria <strong>of</strong> maize. There<br />

was an increase in the abundance <strong>of</strong> Alpha Proteobacteria and Actinobacteria under water<br />

stressed conditions as compared to well watered conditions.<br />

References<br />

674 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Chaudhari, D., Rangappa, K., Das, A., Layek, J., Basavaraj, S., Kandpal, B.K., Shouche, Y.,<br />

Rahi, P. 2020. Pea (Pisum sativumL.) Plant shapes its rhizosphere microbiome for<br />

nutrient uptake and stress amelioration in acidic soils <strong>of</strong> the North-East Region <strong>of</strong> India.<br />

Frontiers in Microbiology. 11:968.<br />

Rascovan, N., Carbonetto, B., Perrig, D., DoÂaz, M., Canciani, W., Abalo, M. 2016. Integrated<br />

analysis <strong>of</strong> root microbiomes <strong>of</strong> soybean and wheat from agricultural fields. Scientific<br />

Reports. 6: 280-84.<br />

Rout, M.E. 2014. The plant microbiome. Advances in Botanical Research. 69: 279–309.<br />

Santos-Medellín, C., Edwards, J., Liechty, Z., Nguyen, B., Sundaresan, V. 2017. Drought stress<br />

results in a compartment-specific restructuring <strong>of</strong> the rice root-associated microbiomes.<br />

mBio. 8: e00764-17.<br />

T4a-47P-1196<br />

Soil Organic Carbon Sequestration Potential under the Changing Climatic<br />

Scenarios in Different Agroecosystems <strong>of</strong> India<br />

Nishant K Sinha * , M. Mohanty, J. Somasundaram, Pramod Jha, R. S. Chaudhary,<br />

J. K. Thakur, Dhiraj Kumar, Jitendra Kumar, R. H. Wanjari and A. B. Singh.<br />

ICAR-Indian Institute <strong>of</strong> Soil Science (ICAR-IISS)<br />

Nabibagh, Bhopal-462038<br />

* nishant.sinha76211@gmai.com, nishant.sinha@icar.gov.in<br />

Soil organic matter (SOM) is vital for enhancing soil fertility and sustain crop productivity.<br />

Worldwide, the largest pool <strong>of</strong> terrestrial carbon (C) is contained in soils, and under best<br />

management practices, soils may also have great potential to act as C sinks and assist in climate<br />

change mitigation. However, historic cultivation practices, including tillage, fertilization, and<br />

other management, have exerted significant pressure on agricultural soils' capacity to store and<br />

cycle organic C, leading to reduced soil organic carbon (SOC) stocks. The SOC dynamics in soil<br />

are controlled by complex interactions between various factors such as climate, soil, and<br />

agricultural management practices. We utilized a process-based model, RothC, to simulate longterm<br />

SOC dynamics for rice-based cropping systems under 100% NPK and farmyard manure<br />

management (FYM) practices using the LTFE experiment dataset. The RothC model was<br />

parameterized and validated to predict SOC stock. The validated model was then used to<br />

evaluate the impacts <strong>of</strong> different management practices on SOC dynamics under different<br />

climatic scenarios. The results demonstrated that management practices with FYM have great<br />

675 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

potential to increase SOC sequestration in the rice-based cropping system. The equilibrium SOC<br />

concentration is higher with an integrated application <strong>of</strong> N with FYM. Climate change decreases<br />

the rate <strong>of</strong> SOC sequestration in all the studied agroecosystems, with higher decreases reported<br />

under RCP 8.5, followed by RCP 6.0, RCP 4.5, and RCP 2.6.<br />

T4a-48P-1305<br />

Sustaining Cotton Productivity and Soil Health with Conjoint Use <strong>of</strong> Organic<br />

and Inorganic Sources under Cotton-based Intercropping Systems on<br />

Vertisols in Central India<br />

D. V. Mali, B. A. Sonune, V. K. Kharche, V. V. Gabhane, A.N. Paslawar, S. D. Jadhao,<br />

O. S. Rakhonde, N. M. Konde and D. N. Nalge<br />

Dept. <strong>of</strong> Soil Science and Agril. Chemistry,<br />

Dr. Panjabrao Deshmukh Krishi Vidyapeeth, Akola- 444 104(Maharashtra)<br />

Cotton is one <strong>of</strong> the most important cash crops which plays a key role in the economy <strong>of</strong> farmers.<br />

The nutrient removal by crops is generally more than that supplied through chemical fertilizer<br />

and this negative balance over the year led to low fertility status <strong>of</strong> soil, which resulted in a<br />

decline in the crop yield. Adequate and timely application <strong>of</strong> organic and inorganic fertilizers not<br />

only increases crop yield but also improves the physical, chemical, and biological properties <strong>of</strong><br />

soil. When integrated nutrient management through chemical fertilizers and different organic<br />

sources is applied on a long-term basis, they show a beneficial impact on soil quality (Swarup<br />

2010).The application <strong>of</strong> green manures to soil is considered a good management practice in any<br />

agricultural production system because it stimulates soil microbial growth and their activities,<br />

besides mineralization <strong>of</strong> organically bound plant nutrients, and therefore increases soil fertility<br />

and quality (Doran et al., 1988). Therefore, the present study was carried out to study the effect<br />

<strong>of</strong> conjoint use <strong>of</strong> organic and inorganic sources on soil fertility, chemical properties, and<br />

productivity <strong>of</strong> cotton under cotton-based intercropping systems in Vertisols in the Vidarbha<br />

region <strong>of</strong> Maharashtra, India.<br />

Methodology<br />

The present investigation was conducted at Research Farm, Department <strong>of</strong> Soil Science and<br />

Agricultural Chemistry, Dr. Panjabrao Deshmukh Krishi Vidyapeeth, Akola during the year<br />

2017-18 to 2020-21 on Vertisols. The study has focused on the conjoint effect <strong>of</strong> nutrient<br />

management and a cotton-based intercropping system. The field experiment was comprised <strong>of</strong> the<br />

main plot (nutrient management) and subplot (cotton-based intercropping systems) with three<br />

replications. There are two treatments <strong>of</strong> nutrient management (INM and only organics) and five<br />

676 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

treatments in cotton-based intercropping systems. The nutrient management consists <strong>of</strong> INM<br />

(M1) comprising 75% RDF + compensation through NPS compost, Organic (M2) comprising<br />

100% NPK dose through NPS compost, and cotton-based intercropping systems i.e. Only cotton<br />

(S1), cotton + dhaincha (S2), cotton + sunhemp (S3), cotton + greengram (S4), cotton +<br />

blackgram (S5). The soil is slightly alkaline in reaction (pH 7.76), low in available nitrogen<br />

(195.17 kg N ha -1 ), low in available phosphorus (12.90 kg p ha -1 ), very high in available potash<br />

(368.42 kg K ha -1 ) and has 8.27 mg kg -1 available sulphur and 0.52 mg kg -1 DTPA extractable<br />

zinc.<br />

Results<br />

The significantly higher organic carbon (6.12 g kg -1 ) was observed with the application <strong>of</strong> 100%<br />

nutrients through nitrophosphosulpho (NPS) compost only as compared to nutrients supplied<br />

through integrated nutrient management (5.80 g kg -1 ) i.e. 75% RDF + 25% compensation<br />

through NPS compost as shown in the table. While, under cotton-based intercropping systems,<br />

cotton + dhaincha (1:1) recorded significantly highest organic carbon (6.43 g kg -1 ) followed by<br />

cotton + sunhemp (1:1) (6.18 g kg -1 ) which was found on par with each other. The lowest<br />

organic carbon (5.47 g kg -1 ) was noticed under sole cotton treatment.<br />

The residual soil fertility status in respect <strong>of</strong> available nitrogen (235 kg ha -1 ), phosphorus (21.80<br />

kg ha -1 ), potassium (412 kg ha -1 ), and sulphur (12.73 mg kg -1 ) was increased significantly due to<br />

the application <strong>of</strong> 75 % RDF + 25% compensation through NPS compost as compared to the<br />

application <strong>of</strong> 100% NPK dose through NPS compost (organic only) under nutrient management.<br />

Under the treatments <strong>of</strong> cotton-based intercropping systems, the significantly higher value <strong>of</strong><br />

available N (242 kg ha -1 ), P (23.70 kg ha -1 ), K (418 kg ha -1 ), and S (13.30 mg kg -1 ) was recorded<br />

in the intercropping <strong>of</strong> cotton + dhaincha (1:1) which was at par with the intercropping <strong>of</strong> cotton<br />

+ sunhemp (1:1). The lowest available nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium and sulphur status was<br />

recorded in the treatment <strong>of</strong> sole cotton only. The nutrient management and cotton-based<br />

intercropping system interaction effect was found to be non-significant.<br />

Under the nutrient management, the significantly higher soil microbial biomass carbon (210.41<br />

mg kg -1 ), dehydrogenase activity (46.01 µg g -1 24 hr -1 ) and CO2 evolution (47.59 mg 100 -1 g soil)<br />

were recorded in the treatment receiving 100% RDF through NPS compost as compared to the<br />

nutrients supplied through 75 % RDF + 25% compensation through NPS compost. The<br />

significantly highest SMBC (217.43 mg kg -1 ), dehydrogenase activity (48.91 µg g -1 24 hr -1 ) and<br />

CO2 evolution (52.27 mg 100 -1 g soil) was observed in the intercropping treatment <strong>of</strong> cotton +<br />

dhaincha (1:1) followed by intercropping <strong>of</strong> cotton + sunhemp (1:1) which were on par with each<br />

other. The lowest biological properties were recorded in sole cotton.<br />

677 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

A<br />

Conclusion<br />

Hence, it can be concluded that integrated nutrient management (75 % RDF + Compen. through<br />

NPS compost) and intercropping <strong>of</strong> cotton with dhaincha (1:1) were found superior in sustaining<br />

the cotton productivity and improving chemical and biological properties <strong>of</strong> Vertisol under<br />

rainfed conditions in Vidarbha region <strong>of</strong> central India.<br />

References<br />

Doran, J.W., D.G. Fraser, M.N. Culik and W.C. Liebhardt, 1988. Influence <strong>of</strong> alternative and<br />

conventional agricultural management on soil microbial process and nitrogen.<br />

American Journal <strong>of</strong> Alternative Agriculture 2 (3): 99-106.<br />

Swarup, Anand (2010). Integrated plant nutrient supply and management strategies for<br />

enhancing soil quality, input use efficiency and crop productivity. J. Indian Soc. Soil<br />

Sci. 58:25-31.<br />

Effect <strong>of</strong> conjoint use <strong>of</strong> organic and inorganic sources on rainfed cotton productivity<br />

and chemical and biological properties <strong>of</strong> Vertisols<br />

Treatments<br />

Main Plot<br />

(Nutrient<br />

Management)<br />

M1 INM (75 % RDF +<br />

25% compensation<br />

through NPS<br />

compost)<br />

M2 Organic (100 %<br />

RDF through<br />

Nitrophosphosulpho<br />

compost)<br />

SE (m) <br />

Cotton yield<br />

(q ha –1 )<br />

Seed<br />

cotton<br />

Cotton<br />

stalk<br />

OC<br />

Available Nutrients<br />

(kg ha -1 )<br />

Avail.<br />

Sulphur<br />

(g kg -1 ) N P K (mg kg -1 ) SMBC<br />

(mg kg -<br />

1 )<br />

Biological properties<br />

DHA<br />

(µg g -1<br />

24 hr -1 )<br />

CO2<br />

evolution<br />

(mg 100 -1<br />

g soil)<br />

14.09 28.01 5.80 235 21.80 412 12.73 202.04 36.33 41.80<br />

12.35 24.48 6.12 228 20.50 404 12.36 210.41 46.01 47.59<br />

0.11 0.20 0.057 1.53 0.29 1.8<br />

0<br />

0.04 1.59 0.84 0.90<br />

CD at 5 % 0.33 0.58 0.169 4.53 0.86 5.34 0.11 4.73 2.49 2.66<br />

B. Sub plot (Cotton based intercropping systems)<br />

S1<br />

S2<br />

S3<br />

Control (only<br />

cotton) 12.39<br />

Cotton + Dhaincha<br />

(1:1) 14.30<br />

Cotton + Sunhemp<br />

(1:1) 13.89<br />

24.00 5.47 222 18.50 395 11.70 193.41 32.89 37.76<br />

28.91 6.43 242 23.70 418 13.30 217.43 48.91 52.27<br />

27.97 6.18 237 22.66 415 13.17 213.10 44.43 49.51<br />

678 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

S4<br />

S5<br />

Cotton + Green<br />

gram (1:1) 12.97<br />

Cotton + Black<br />

gram (1:1) 12.56<br />

SE (m)<br />

CD at 5 %<br />

25.65 5.91 230 20.61 409 12.35 204.94 40.31 42.97<br />

24.72 5.82 226 20.29 404 12.22 202.25 38.30 40.99<br />

0.17 0.32 0.090 2.41 0.46 2.8<br />

4<br />

0.52 0.96 0.267 7.17 1.35 8.4<br />

4<br />

0.06 2.52 1.33 1.42<br />

0.18 7.48 3.94 4.21<br />

C. Interaction effect NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS<br />

Initial value 4.96 204 14.90 379 8.27<br />

Sustaining Soil Health Through Organic Farming<br />

R. S. Choudhary* and Mahendra Singh<br />

Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Sirohi, Rajasthan<br />

Directorate <strong>of</strong> Extension Education, Agriculture University, Jodhpur, Rajasthan<br />

*agroudr2013@gmail.com<br />

T4a-49P-1427<br />

In 2050, the world population will reach ~10 billion, an increase <strong>of</strong> 30%. According to the UN,<br />

food insecurity is one <strong>of</strong> the greatest challenges facing us today. Soil is a precious natural<br />

resource, about 98% <strong>of</strong> our food—directly or indirectly—comes from soil. Therefore, sustaining<br />

soil health/sustainable soil management (SSM) is essential in addressing food security and socioeconomic<br />

and environmental issues. It can be inferred that enhancing carbon sequestration in soil<br />

is associated with increased biomass and, therefore, to soil fertility. Better quality soil ensures<br />

better yields; and exactly for this reason, we have been manipulating the natural soil with the<br />

reckless use <strong>of</strong> chemical fertilizers that provide additional nitrogen, phosphorous and potassium<br />

(NPK), leading to over fertilization and diminishing yields. Hence, organic farming aims to<br />

attain long-term sustainability since it is based on ecologically sound practices to provide<br />

nutrients for crop growth and thereby, in the long term, it ensures productivity gains by<br />

improving soil health. Presence <strong>of</strong> soil organic matter and soil microbial population are primarily<br />

useful indicators <strong>of</strong> soil health and productivity <strong>of</strong> crops. It is now a well-established fact that<br />

organically managed soil exhibits greater soil organic carbon and total nitrogen, lower nitrate<br />

leaching and biological soil quality than conventionally managed soil. Soil health management<br />

through organic approaches are needed for maintaining the sustainability <strong>of</strong> agriculture as well as<br />

to maintain the coordination with nature.<br />

679 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Controversy has long surrounded the question <strong>of</strong> nutritional differences between crops grown<br />

organically or using now-conventional methods, with studies dating back to the 1940s showing<br />

that farming methods can affect the nutrient density <strong>of</strong> crops. More recent studies have shown<br />

how reliance on tillage and synthetic nitrogen fertilizers influence soil life, and thereby soil<br />

health, in ways that can reduce mineral micronutrient uptake by and phytochemical production in<br />

crops. While organic farming tends to enhance soil health and conventional practices degrade it,<br />

relying on tillage for weed control on both organic and conventional farms degrades soil organic<br />

matter and can disrupt soil life in ways that reduce crop mineral uptake and phytochemical<br />

production. Soil health reflects both biotic and abiotic (chemical and physical) aspects <strong>of</strong> the soil.<br />

Conventional metrics for assessing soil quality have primarily focused on physical and chemical<br />

factors that support crop production, yet growing awareness <strong>of</strong> the importance <strong>of</strong> soil ecology<br />

and the diversity and abundance <strong>of</strong> soil life is reshaping agronomic thought to embrace<br />

enhancing and sustaining soil health as a fundamental agronomic goal. To achieve sustainable<br />

crop production, the primary requirement is the maintenance <strong>of</strong> soil fertility and soil health.<br />

Organic farming systems being highly complex and integrated biological systems could be the<br />

potential technology option to maintain good soil heath for sustainable crop production.<br />

T4a-50P-1261<br />

Type <strong>of</strong> Organic Manure and Biochar Affected Crop Production and Soil<br />

Health in Maize-Black Gram System Under Changing Climate<br />

Shaon Kumar Das 1 , B. U. Choudhury 2 , Ramgopal Laha 1 and V. K. Mishra 2<br />

1 ICAR Research Complex for NEH Region, Sikkim Centre, Gangtok, Sikkim-737102<br />

2 ICAR Research Complex for NEH Region, Umiam, Meghalaya-793103<br />

With increase in pyrolysis temperature the higher heating value <strong>of</strong> all the four-biochar decreased.<br />

The crystallinity index deceased (average 8.98%) in all biochar with increase in pyrolysis<br />

temperature. At low temperature pyrolysis the polarity index tends to increase and vice-versa.<br />

The biochar under study enhanced the seed germination and seedling growth significantly at a<br />

reasonable application rate than higher rate which might be due to secretion <strong>of</strong> chemical<br />

substances by the respective biochar. The organic manure/biochar (co-compost) ratio at 75:25<br />

enhanced maximum yield in poultry manure (4528 and 1027 kg/ha) followed by goat manure<br />

(4378 and 1016 kg/ha), vermicompost (4278 and 986 kg/ha), pig manure (4218 and 956 kg/ha),<br />

and FYM (4178 and 949 kg/ha) for maize and black gram, respectively. The microbial biomass<br />

carbon was highest in goat manure 5 t ha -1 +biochar 5 t ha -1 (476.58 mg kg -1 soil) and lowest in<br />

FYM @ 10 t ha -1 +biochar 5 t ha -1 (458.53 mg kg -1 soil) than control (301.43 mg kg -1 soil). The<br />

680 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

nitrogen use efficiency followed as BGB-SRF (38.3 %) > MSB-SRF (37.5 %) > LCB-SRF (36.2<br />

%) > PNB-SRF (35.7 %) than fertilizer (22.8 %). After 288 hr <strong>of</strong> incubation the N-P-K nutrient<br />

release from hydrogel-biochar composite varied 36.49-81.37%. Similarly, it exhibited 35.46-<br />

90.83% release <strong>of</strong> N-P-K in soil after 45 days study. The release kinetics fitted by Korsmeyer-<br />

Peppas model illustrates that the n values were 0.5-1.0 (anomalous transport). Utilizing four<br />

different biochars, the average removal rate <strong>of</strong> heavy metal from aqueous solution was 49.5-<br />

66.1%(Cd), 47.3-60.0%(Pb), 45.5-60.6%(Ni), 46.6-60.8%(Zn), 49.3-63.2%(Cu) and 52.7-64.2%<br />

(As) compared with no biochar treatment. Biochar amendment has attracted a fair amount <strong>of</strong><br />

research interest due to its abundant usage and wide potential. Assuming that the science <strong>of</strong><br />

biochar is ‘unambiguously beneficial’, all the scientific community should support the biochar<br />

application for modern science and technological intervension.<br />

T4a-51P-1176<br />

Vermicomposting-A Module for Sustainable Soil Management in South Garo<br />

Hills, Meghalaya, India<br />

Titus Dalang K. Momin*, Athokpam Haribhushan, Basu langpoklakpam,<br />

Rike Ch A Sangma, Tanya R Marak, Bishorjit Ningthoujam, Rupam Bhattacharjya and<br />

Thongam Monika Devi<br />

KVK, South Garo Hills, Chokpot, Meghalaya<br />

*dalangssangma76@gmail.com<br />

Vermicompost is recognized as a high-nutrient bi<strong>of</strong>ertilizer with a range <strong>of</strong> microbial<br />

communities and it considerably increases the growth and yield <strong>of</strong> different field crops,<br />

vegetables, flower and fruit crops. Vermicomposting organic material with earthworms not only<br />

yields the healthiest organic manure but also lessens environmental pollution and health hazards.<br />

The experiment was laid out in a three-replicated randomized block design (RBD) with 3<br />

treatments. The highest production <strong>of</strong> vermicompost was recorded in the T3 (348kg/vermibed).<br />

The production <strong>of</strong> vermicompost in T2 was (340kg/vermibed) followed by T1 <strong>of</strong><br />

(332kg/vermibed). Result revealed that among the different vermicomposting units T3 was<br />

efficient in terms <strong>of</strong> quantity <strong>of</strong> vermicompost harvested. Among the Treatments the highest<br />

Benefit: Cost ratio was recorded in T3 (4.85.1) followed by T2 (4.74.1) and T1(4.63.1).<br />

681 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

T4a-52P- 1137<br />

Weedy rice: A Threat to Sustainable Rice Production under Direct Seeding<br />

V. Anjaly<br />

Ph.D. scholar, Department <strong>of</strong> Agronomy, Punjab Agricultural University<br />

Rice is the staple food <strong>of</strong> more than 50% <strong>of</strong> the world’s population and the conventional method<br />

<strong>of</strong> rice growing, which involves puddling followed by transplanting, is a labour and water<br />

intensive process. Increased costs or decreased availability <strong>of</strong> irrigation water and labour has<br />

forced the farmers in Asia to slowly proceed towards direct seeding <strong>of</strong> rice (Chauhan, 2012). The<br />

absence <strong>of</strong> suppressive effect <strong>of</strong> standing water on weed emergence and similarity in seed sizes<br />

<strong>of</strong> crop and weeds has led to the serious concern <strong>of</strong> weedy rice infestation in most <strong>of</strong> the rice<br />

growing tracts. Weedy rice infestation raises the production costs, lowers the crop yield and<br />

qualitatively decreases the farmer’s income, through reduced seed value at the time <strong>of</strong> harvest .<br />

In recent years, weedy rice has emerged to be one <strong>of</strong> the major troublesome weeds in rice<br />

growing Asian countries, including Malaysia, Thailand, Philippines, India, Republic <strong>of</strong> Korea,<br />

Vietnam and Sri Lanka<br />

Weedy rice (Oryza sativa f. spontanea) is believed to be evolved through the interbreeding<br />

between cultivated rice (O. sativa) and wild rice (O. nivara/O. perennis) (Chauhan, 2013). The<br />

physical and physiological similarities <strong>of</strong> weedy rice to cultivated rice have made the weedy seed<br />

spread more easier through crop seed contamination. Features like faster growth, pr<strong>of</strong>use tiller<br />

production, early flowering and high competence for nutrients, light and space provide them<br />

competitive advantage over cultivated rice. The weed is also characterized by longer seed<br />

dormancy, easy seed shattering (enhance weed seed bank), presence <strong>of</strong> awns, red pericarp and<br />

pigmented aleuronic layer, and the ability to thrive in adverse agro-climatic conditions<br />

Weed management strategies such as use <strong>of</strong> clean rice seeds and machineries, regular inspection<br />

and roguing <strong>of</strong> weedy rice plants before seed set, repeated cultivation <strong>of</strong> rice fields, stale seed<br />

bed technique, use <strong>of</strong> transplanting technique wherever plenty <strong>of</strong> exploitable water is available,<br />

use <strong>of</strong> high seeding rates, row seeding using seed drills, and use <strong>of</strong> weed competitive crop<br />

cultivar with early vigour and quick canopy closure, are advocated (Chauhan, 2013). An<br />

improved broadcasting method called ‘parachute planting’ is practiced in Vietnam and Sri<br />

Lanka, in which the rice seedlings, grown in nursery, are thrown onto the puddled soil, with<br />

water depth maintained at 5 to 10 cm. Chauhan et al. (2014) concluded that seedling broadcast<br />

and transplanted rice methods are the most effective rice establishment techniques to reduce<br />

weedy rice panicles and seed production, and to attain highest rice grain yield. Adoption <strong>of</strong><br />

682 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

cultivars with purple-coloured leaves will help in differentiating the weedy rice and other grassy<br />

weeds from the direct sown rice. Rotation <strong>of</strong> rice with a dissimilar crop, such as corn, mungbean,<br />

soybean and sesame, helps in disrupting the growth cycle <strong>of</strong> many problematic weeds, including<br />

purple nutsedge (Cyperus rotundus) (Chauhan, 2013).<br />

Similarity in terms <strong>of</strong> anatomical and physiological traits between rice and weedy rice makes the<br />

herbicidal control <strong>of</strong> the weed difficult. Application <strong>of</strong> pre-emergent herbicides (pretilachlor,<br />

metolachlor, oxadiazon) with appropriate modification in time and method <strong>of</strong> application is<br />

advisable (Chauhan, 2013). The ‘KAU weed wiper’ is a device specially designed for the control<br />

<strong>of</strong> weedy rice through the direct application <strong>of</strong> non-selective herbicides like glyphosate or<br />

glufosinate ammonium on the earheads. The quick growth <strong>of</strong> weedy rice results in about 15-30<br />

cm height difference between cultivated rice and weedy rice. This facilitates the easier<br />

application <strong>of</strong> herbicides on the earhead <strong>of</strong> weedy rice without having any phytotoxic effect on<br />

rice. It was reported that the weed control efficiency <strong>of</strong> weed wiper in terms <strong>of</strong> drying <strong>of</strong> weedy<br />

rice panicles is as high as 83 to 88%. According to Suh (2008), herbicide resistant (glyphosate-,<br />

glufosinate ammonium- and imidazolinone resistant) rice cultivars could be an effective tool for<br />

farmers to improve weedy rice control with reduced costs.<br />

Heavy infestation <strong>of</strong> weedy rice has forced many farmers to abandon their crops without<br />

harvesting. The problem will worsen and become more persistent as direct seeding increasingly<br />

becomes the popular method <strong>of</strong> crop establishment in rice. This may challenge the rice<br />

production system in the country if not managed effectively in the subsequent years.<br />

Awareness has to be created among farmers regarding the use <strong>of</strong> clean and uncontaminated seeds<br />

and machineries. Future research should focus on the integration <strong>of</strong> cultural management<br />

practices with the use <strong>of</strong> cultivars capable to grow in flooded conditions. Strong gelines for the<br />

use <strong>of</strong> herbicide resistant rice cultivars need to be formed to avoid the development <strong>of</strong> resistance<br />

in weedy rice through gene flow.<br />

References<br />

Chauhan, B. S., and Johnson, D. E. 2010. Weedy rice (Oryza sativa L.) I. Grain characteristics<br />

and growth response to competition <strong>of</strong> weedy rice variants from five Asian countries.<br />

Weed Sci. 58:374-380.<br />

Chauhan, B. S. 2013. Strategies to manage weedy rice in Asia. Crop Prot. 48:51-56.<br />

Chauhan, B. S., Abeysekera, A. S., Wickramarathe, M. S., Kulatunga, S. D. and Wickrama, U.<br />

B. 2014. Effect <strong>of</strong> rice establishment methods on weedy rice (Oryza sativa L.) infestation<br />

and grain yield <strong>of</strong> cultivated rice (O. sativa L.) in Sri Lanka. Crop Prot. 55:42-49.<br />

683 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Rathore, M., Singh, R. and Kumar, B., 2013. Weedy rice: an emerging threat to rice cultivation<br />

and options for its management. Curr. Sci. 1067-1072.<br />

Suh, H.S., 2008. Weedy Rice. National Institute <strong>of</strong> Crop Science, Rural Development<br />

Administration (RDA), Korea.<br />

T4a-53P-1546<br />

Yield and Nutrient Uptake <strong>of</strong> Direct Seeded Rice under Different Tillage and<br />

Nutrient Management Practices<br />

P. Manoj Kumar 1* , D K Roy 2 , Santosh Kumar Singh 2 , N K Ray 2<br />

1 Kerala Agricultural University, Thrissur, Kerala, India<br />

2 Dr. Rajendra Prasad Central Agricultural University, Pusa, Bihar, India<br />

* manojpittala@gmail.com<br />

Rice (Oryza sativa L.) is one <strong>of</strong> the major food crops, especially in Southeast Asia, where it is<br />

the principal diet for Asian inhabitants, with about 35-80% <strong>of</strong> the calorie supply for daily needs.<br />

Rice is grown in around all Indian states and Bihar, one <strong>of</strong> them, is the country’s 6 th largest in<br />

terms <strong>of</strong> rice production, with a yearly output <strong>of</strong> 8.09 Mt from an area <strong>of</strong> 3.3 Mha. The average<br />

productivity in Bihar is 2.44 t/ha, slightly below the national average (DoE and S, Govt. <strong>of</strong><br />

Bihar, 2019-20). Conventional cultivation <strong>of</strong> transplanted rice, besides being tiresome,<br />

expensive, and time-killing, long-term puddling practice in rice cultivating areas affects soil<br />

aggregates, the beneficial microbial activity, and the general soil environment (Bhattacharyya et<br />

al., 2012). Rational nutrient supply is a prerequisite for the growth and development <strong>of</strong> rice.<br />

Disproportionate nutrient application diminishes nutrient uptake by crops, NUE, deteriorates the<br />

ecological quality, and increases the cultivation cost. Against the above backdrop, this study was<br />

conducted to determine the effect <strong>of</strong> different tillage and nutrient management practices on the<br />

yield and nutrient uptake <strong>of</strong> direct-seeded rice.<br />

Methodology<br />

A field experiment was conducted in an ongoing long-term tillage trail that was established in<br />

2010 under a set <strong>of</strong> tillage and nutrient management treatments with the Rice-Maize cropping<br />

system at the Agronomical Research Farm (plot no. 5) <strong>of</strong> Tirhut college <strong>of</strong> agriculture, Dholi<br />

(RPCAU) during Kharif 2019. The soil belongs to the great group calciorthent, textural class <strong>of</strong><br />

sandy loam, alkaline, moderate in OC, N, phosphorous, potassium and deficient in sulphur, and<br />

zinc. A short-duration rice variety Prabhat was taken as a test variety. The total rainfall received<br />

during the crop growth period was 1039.8 mm. The experiment was laid out in ‘split-plot design’<br />

684 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

with tillage practices under main plot treatments which include T1: Conventional tillage (CT);<br />

T2: Zero tillage (ZT) and T3: Zero tillage + Residue (ZT+R) and nutrient management practices<br />

as subplot treatments which include N1: Recommended Dose <strong>of</strong> Fertilizer (RDF) @ 120-60-40<br />

kg N-P2O5-K2O kg ha -1 with N applied in three splits; N2: site-specific nutrient management<br />

(SSNM) based on Nutrient Expert for rice @ 109-28-46 kg N-P2O5-K2O with N applied in<br />

three splits and N3: 60 % N @ basal + green seeker ged N application (GSGN) (rest <strong>of</strong> the N was<br />

applied based on the real-time crop demand at regular intervals) + 100% PK <strong>of</strong> RDF. Three splits<br />

<strong>of</strong> N were applied @ 2:1:1 ratio at basal, active tillering, and panicle initiation in N1 and N2<br />

treatments.<br />

Results<br />

The yield attributes like panicles/m 2 and grains/ panicle were significantly higher under ZT+R<br />

(239; 122) over CT (201; 107) among tillage practices whereas, among nutrient management<br />

treatments, SSNM based on Nutrient Expert (228; 119) has significantly higher values over RDF<br />

(212; 111). Both grain and straw yields <strong>of</strong> DSR were statistically superior in ZT+R over CT with<br />

14.03 % and 9.27 % more yields, respectively but were statistically at par with ZT whereas,<br />

SSNM based on Nutrient Expert has significantly superior grain and straw yields over RDF with<br />

14.91 % and 7.73 % more yields respectively but were statistically at par with 60% N + GSGN +<br />

100% PK <strong>of</strong> RDF. Any <strong>of</strong> the treatments did not influence Harvest Index (HI); however, higher<br />

HI was found under ZT+R (41.05) fb ZT (40.89) fb CT (39.86) among tillage practices while,<br />

SSNM based on Nutrient Expert has higher HI (41.25) fb 60% N + GSGN + 100% PK <strong>of</strong> RDF<br />

(41.04) fb RDF (39.52) across nutrient management practices.These better yields under ZT +R,<br />

ZT could be credited to the improved soil structure, overall porosity, aggregate stability, water<br />

holding capacity (WHC) due to less soil disruption and with constant crop residue accumulation<br />

over the years enriched the soil with organic matter and soil biota which enhances the<br />

mineralization process and increasing plant nutrient availability and also these precision nutrient<br />

management practices aided in timely and balanced availability <strong>of</strong> all vital nutrients thereby<br />

progressing crop yields through optimized nutrient usage by the rice crop. The total N, P, K, Zn,<br />

Fe, Cu, and Mn uptake by the crop was found to be significantly higher in Zero tillage + Residue<br />

management among tillage practices, whereas among nutrient management treatments, SSNM<br />

based on Nutrient Expert have significantly higher total N, P, and K uptake but has no significant<br />

influence on micronutrient uptake and these results are in accordance with Rajesh et al. (2018).<br />

685 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Tillage practices<br />

Effect <strong>of</strong> tillage and nutrient management practices on yield performance <strong>of</strong> DSR<br />

Treatment<br />

No. <strong>of</strong><br />

panicles/ m 2<br />

No. <strong>of</strong> grains/<br />

panicle<br />

Grain yield<br />

(q/ha)<br />

Straw yield<br />

(q/ha)<br />

Harvest<br />

Index (%)<br />

T1: Conventional tillage 201 107 39.50 59.25 39.86<br />

T2: Zero tillage 220 115 43.51 62.87 40.89<br />

T3: Zero tillage + Residue 239 122 45.04 64.74 41.05<br />

SEm± 6 2 0.64 1.05 0.51<br />

LSD (p =0.05) 23 9 2.51 4.11 NS<br />

Nutrient management<br />

N1: RDF 212 111 39.16 59.65 39.52<br />

N2: SSNM based on Nutrient Expert 228 119 45.00 64.26 41.25<br />

N3: 60%N+GSGN+100 % PK <strong>of</strong> RDF 219 114 43.89 62.94 41.04<br />

SEm± 4 2 1.19 1.18 0.87<br />

LSD (p=0.05) 12 6 3.65 3.63 NS<br />

LSD (p=0.05) (T x NM) NS NS NS NS NS<br />

Effect <strong>of</strong> tillage and nutrient management practices on total uptake (grain + straw) <strong>of</strong><br />

N, P, K, Zn, Fe, Cu and Mn by direct seeded rice (DSR)<br />

Treatment N P K Zn Fe Cu Mn<br />

Tillage practices (kg/ha) (g/ha)<br />

T1: Conventional tillage 76.76 22.20 92.23 278.32 448.50 44.16 318.85<br />

T2: Zero tillage 83.85 24.32 96.60 298.37 484.42 50.36 339.53<br />

T3: Zero tillage + Residue 86.71 24.62 99.99 305.14 489.57 54.79 345.94<br />

SEm± 1.38 0.23 0.83 2.48 6.50 1.36 4.99<br />

LSD (p =0.05) 5.42 0.92 3.25 9.74 25.53 5.36 19.61<br />

Nutrient management<br />

N1: RDF 76.09 22.17 90.36 286.54 459.22 46.88 328.08<br />

N2: SSNM based on Nutrient Expert 87.38 24.77 99.51 296.67 485.10 52.84 340.52<br />

N3: 60%N+GSGN+100 % PK <strong>of</strong> RDF 83.85 24.19 98.95 298.63 478.17 49.60 335.72<br />

SEm± 2.08 0.49 1.62 5.12 9.50 1.54 6.99<br />

LSD (p=0.05) 6.42 1.50 5.00 NS NS NS NS<br />

LSD (p=0.05) (T x NM) NS NS NS NS NS NS NS<br />

Conclusion<br />

In a nutshell, the results <strong>of</strong> this study indicated that direct seeding <strong>of</strong> Kharif rice under zero tillage +<br />

residue management practice coupled with SSNM based on Nutrient Expert led to improved growth<br />

parameters, yield attributes, crop yields, and nutrient uptake by the crop.<br />

686 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

References<br />

Bhattacharyya, R., Tuti, M. D., Bisht, J. K., Bhatt, J. C., and Gupta, H. S. 2012. Conservation<br />

tillage and fertilization impact on soil aggregation and carbon pools in the Indian<br />

Himalayas under an irrigated rice-wheat rotation. Soil Science 177: 218–228.<br />

Directorate <strong>of</strong> Economics and Statistics, Govt. <strong>of</strong> Bihar, 2019-20.<br />

Rajesh, V., Balanagoudar, S. R., Veeresh, H., Gaddi, A. K., and Ramesh, Y. M. 2018. Effect <strong>of</strong><br />

Nutrient Management Approaches and Major Nutrients on Dry Direct Seeded Rice (dry-<br />

DSR) in TBP Command Area. Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. App. Sci. 7(2): 1239-1247.<br />

T4a-54P-1411<br />

Zero Tillage Technique with High Yielding Variety <strong>of</strong> Wheat Cultivation as<br />

Compared to Traditional practices <strong>of</strong> farmers field in Front line<br />

demonstration under NICRA <strong>of</strong> Morena District M.P.<br />

Rajpal Singh Tomar, Swati Singh Tomar, Brijraj Singh Kansana, PKS Gurjar and<br />

Debesh Singh<br />

RVSKVV, Krishi Vigyan Kendra, A.B Road Morena<br />

kvk.morena@rvskvv.net<br />

India is the second largest producer <strong>of</strong> wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in the world. After the Green<br />

Revolution, the production <strong>of</strong> wheat has shown a huge increase. The major states involved<br />

Madhya Pradesh, Uttar Pradesh, Punjab and Haryana. They account for nearly 70 percent <strong>of</strong> the<br />

total wheat production <strong>of</strong> the country. Madhya Pradesh, Uttar pradesh Punjab and Haryana yield<br />

the highest amount <strong>of</strong> wheat because <strong>of</strong> the availability <strong>of</strong> better irrigation facilities. Wheat is the<br />

second most important food crop <strong>of</strong> India next to rice and demand for wheat in the country is<br />

increasing day by day.<br />

The study was conducted Village Ata Gadikhera Block <strong>of</strong> Joura in Morena district Madhya<br />

Pradesh under Frontline Demonstration by Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Morena through coordinating<br />

Institution RVSKVV, Krishi Vishwa Vidyalaya, Gwalior, M.P. Demonstration with Zero Tillage<br />

wheat has shown primarily positive impacts on wheat crop management, particularly through<br />

reduced input needs combined with potential yield increase. To evaluate the economics <strong>of</strong> high<br />

yielding variety (MP-1203) and their utilization in zero tillage to improve income <strong>of</strong> farmers and<br />

agricultural productivity, the utilization <strong>of</strong> high yielding variety under frontline demonstration<br />

programme under NICRA. The average yield <strong>of</strong> zero tillage technique was 49.6 q/ha. The data<br />

collected from the field were analyzed and the result <strong>of</strong> the study in respect <strong>of</strong> percentage increase<br />

687 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

in yield in MP-1203 with ZT increased 27.33% over farmers practice by usingMP-1203. The B:C<br />

ratio was observed higher side by using MP-1203 is 2.53 as compared to conventional method<br />

sowing <strong>of</strong> wheat is 1.48 The B: C ratio was observed higher side in zero-tillage method as<br />

compared to conventional method sowing <strong>of</strong> wheat. The finding have clearly established that<br />

wheat sowing can be advanced in yield by using MP-1203 over utilization <strong>of</strong> local variety <strong>of</strong><br />

wheat, under zero tillage method it also clearly established that wheat sowing can be advanced in<br />

yield over conventional tillage system.<br />

T4a-55P-1579<br />

Paired Row Method <strong>of</strong> Cultivation in Maize – a Water Conservation<br />

Technology for Sustainable Yields and Higher Net returns<br />

K. Ravi Kumar 1 , J. Hemantha Kumar 1 , V. Chaitanya 1 , Jessie Suneetha.W 1 , PSM Phanisri 1 ,<br />

D. Nagaraju 1 , R. Uma Reddy 2 and J.V. Prasad 3<br />

1.<br />

Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Wyra, Khammam.<br />

2.<br />

RARS, Warangal.<br />

3.<br />

ICAR, ATARI, Zone-X, CRIDA, Santhosnagar, Hyderabad<br />

Maize is an important crop widely grown for food and feed and is one <strong>of</strong> the most versatile<br />

emerging crops having wider adaptability under varied agro climatic conditions It is mainly<br />

cultivated as rainfed crop in Kharif and as irrigated crop during Rabi. In Khammam district,<br />

Maize is one <strong>of</strong> the important cereal crop cultivated by farmers which is having a normal area <strong>of</strong><br />

13073 ha. It is one <strong>of</strong> the major crop best suited for Rabi which gives good yield with good<br />

management practices. Unfortunately, much <strong>of</strong> the expected yields are not realized because <strong>of</strong><br />

traditional method <strong>of</strong> planting and cultivation resulting in low plant population, poor and uneven<br />

development <strong>of</strong> cobs, limiting moisture levels which affect the crop during the critical stages<br />

resulting in yield loss, nutrient deficiency and wastage <strong>of</strong> fertilizers during application. This<br />

factors in turn increases cost <strong>of</strong> cultivation, competition between weeds and main crop for water,<br />

nutrients and other inputs which affect the crop growth because <strong>of</strong> weed dominance for nutrients.<br />

All these factors together and cultivation <strong>of</strong> maize in the traditional method <strong>of</strong> planting by the<br />

farmers were contributing to the less yields <strong>of</strong> the crop. To overcome this problem, KVK-Wyra<br />

scientists intervened and introduced paired row technique in Maize along with drip irrigation. In<br />

paired row method <strong>of</strong> cultivation, spacing between plant to plant is 20-25 cm, row to row spacing<br />

is 30 cm and spacing between one pair to another pair is 90 cm. For irrigation and fertigation to<br />

the plants, a drip lateral is spread in between the two rows which help in giving uniform water<br />

and fertilizer to both the rows thus decreasing the no <strong>of</strong> lateral requirement per acre. Further, due<br />

688 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

to efficient use <strong>of</strong> sunlight and increased light interception leads to thick and stronger stalks and<br />

healthy development <strong>of</strong> cobs. The results revealed that, farmers realized an additional yield <strong>of</strong> 30<br />

q/ha in paired row method when compared to traditional cultivation method. Further, an<br />

additional income achieved from paired row method <strong>of</strong> planting was Rs.61,467.5/- /ha. Besides<br />

this, the paired row method <strong>of</strong> planting recorded higher gross returns, net returns and B:C ratio<br />

when compared to traditional cultivation method.<br />

T4a-56P-1567<br />

Improving Productivity <strong>of</strong> Taramira (Eruca sativa Mill.) Under Conserved<br />

Soil Moisture in Arid Environments<br />

M. Patidar, R. Saranya and Anil Patidar<br />

ICAR- CAZRI, Reginal Research Station, Jaisalmer, Rajasthan 342 003 India<br />

The availability <strong>of</strong> soil moisture is the most important factor for growing crops in arid conditions<br />

therefore the choice <strong>of</strong> crops is limited due to the low and erratic nature <strong>of</strong> rainfall (Moharana et<br />

al. 2016). Sometimes the rain receives at the end <strong>of</strong> the Kharif season is not utilized by the<br />

Kharif crops and is also not sufficient for growing subsequent long duration rabi crops but the<br />

conserved soil moisture can be utilized for short duration rabi crops. Taramira (Eruca sativa<br />

Mill.) is short duration crop, particularly suitable for north-western Rajasthan, and can be grown<br />

in the early rabi season utilizing the conserved soil moisture (Mundiyara and Jakhar, 2017).<br />

Further, the time <strong>of</strong> sowing needs to be adjusted for improving productivity. With this, the<br />

experiment was conducted to study the utilisation <strong>of</strong> conserved soil moisture and the effect <strong>of</strong><br />

sowing time on its productivity.<br />

Methodology<br />

The experiment was conducted during rabi 2021-22 involving three different dates (Last week <strong>of</strong><br />

September (S1), October (S2), and November (S3)). T1 (last week <strong>of</strong> September)- utilized<br />

conserved soil moisture <strong>of</strong> (103 mm rainfall received in that month) + one irrigation at grain<br />

filling stage, T2 (sown at last week <strong>of</strong> October)- 1 st irrigation after sowing+ 2 nd irrigation at grain<br />

filling stage; T3(sown at last week <strong>of</strong> November)- 1 st irrigation after sowing+ 2 nd irrigation at<br />

grain filling stage. The climate <strong>of</strong> the area is hyper-arid, characterized by exceptionally hot dry<br />

summers, and cold dry winters. The soil is coarse loamy sand, low in organic carbon and<br />

available nitrogen, and medium in available phosphorus with pH 8.1. The rainfall during the year<br />

2021 is 338 mm. Taramira variety RTM -13 was sown in the plot size <strong>of</strong> 5.5 m × 4.5m with 30 ×<br />

10 cm spacing using a seed rate <strong>of</strong> 5 kg/ha. The treatments were replicated four times randomly.<br />

689 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Observations were recorded for plant height, primary branches, pod per branch, pod length, and<br />

seed yield.<br />

Results<br />

The maximum plant height and pod per branch were recorded in S1 (91.58 cm; 34.92) followed<br />

by S2 (87.75 cm; 23.92) and S3 (82.50 cm; 25.50). There was no significant difference in<br />

number <strong>of</strong> primary branches and pod length. The seed yield was highest in S1 (950 kg/ha)<br />

followed by S2 (837.5 kg/ha) and S3 (675 kg/ha). The increase in seed yield due to the first<br />

sowing was by 13.4 and 40.8 % over the second and third sowing respectively. The higher seed<br />

yield in first sowing (S1) was due to better root development and plant growth as result <strong>of</strong> more<br />

availability <strong>of</strong> soil moisture. Its efficient root system helped in extracting moisture from deeper<br />

layers <strong>of</strong> soil.<br />

Conclusion<br />

The result indicates that the crop sown in the last week <strong>of</strong> September, which utilised the<br />

conserved soil moisture, gave a better seed yield than other dates <strong>of</strong> sowing with two irrigations.<br />

During periods <strong>of</strong> severe drought and late monsoon, taramira is the only alternative crop left for<br />

arid region farmers to sustain their livelihood.<br />

References<br />

Moharana, P.C., Santra, P., Singh, D.V., Suresh Kumar, Goyal, R.K., Deepesh Machiwal and<br />

Yadav, O.P. 2016. ICAR-Central Arid Zone Research Institute, Jodhpur: Erosion<br />

Processes and Desertification in the Thar Desert <strong>of</strong> India. Proceedings <strong>of</strong> the Indian<br />

National Science Academy. 82. 10.16943/ptinsa/2016/48507.<br />

Mundiyara, R. and Jakhar, M. L. 2017 Identify Promising Parents and Crosses <strong>of</strong> Taramira<br />

(Eruca sativa Mill.) for Improvement in Irrigated and Drought Conditions. J.<br />

Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry, 6(4): 789-795<br />

690 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

T4a-57P-1367<br />

Influence <strong>of</strong> Organic and Inorganic Nutrients on Nitrogen & Potassium<br />

Fractions In Relation to Yield <strong>of</strong> Elephant Foot Yam - Blackgram System<br />

K. V. Aswin 1* , K. Laxminarayana 2 and J.V.N.S. Prasad 3<br />

*1 College <strong>of</strong> Agriculture, OUAT, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, 751003<br />

2 Regional Centre, ICAR-Central Tuber Crops Research Institute, Bhubaneswar,<br />

Odisha, 751 019<br />

3<br />

ICAR-Central Research Institute <strong>of</strong> Dryland Agriculture, Hyderabad, Telangana, 500059<br />

*aswinkv91@gmail.com<br />

Elephant foot yam (EFY) (Amorphophallus paeoniifolius L), crop produced for its underground<br />

modified stem, encourage the farmers to plant because <strong>of</strong> high quality corms, minimal pest and<br />

disease incidence, and low labour requirements. Black gram [Vigna mungo (L.)] is known as<br />

"King <strong>of</strong> Legumes" and produced as a mixed crop, cash crop, and sequential crop in cropping<br />

systems. Legume-based cropping systems have been shown to be generally beneficial to the soil<br />

by preservation <strong>of</strong> organic matter, increasing soil nitrogen, improving soil physical properties<br />

and by breaking the cycle <strong>of</strong> soil-borne diseases. Inorganic forms <strong>of</strong> major nutrients significantly<br />

contribute to yield and quality attributes <strong>of</strong> crops. Plant roots take up nitrogen from the soil<br />

mostly as NO3 - and to some extent as NH4 + -N. Use <strong>of</strong> chemical fertilizers in conjunction with<br />

organic manures has been reported to influence the dynamics <strong>of</strong> inorganic K fractions. The<br />

distribution <strong>of</strong> inorganic forms <strong>of</strong> N and K in soils is important in understanding the conditions<br />

controlling their availability to growing crops and effective nutrient management strategies.<br />

Methodology<br />

Yield parameters <strong>of</strong> EFY and blackgram were recorded at harvest, the grain & haulm samples <strong>of</strong><br />

black gram as well as corm samples <strong>of</strong> elephant foot yam were collected, washed thoroughly,<br />

oven dried at 60ºC and dry weights were recorded. Inorganic forms <strong>of</strong> N namely NH4-N and<br />

NO3-N were determined by steam distillation method (Black, 1965). Inorganic K fractions were<br />

determined by Boiling Nitric Acid Method (Wood and Deturk, (1941); Pratt, (1965)).<br />

Relationship <strong>of</strong> different N and K fractions with available nitrogen and potassium was worked<br />

out respectively, by computing simple correlation coefficients by employing standard procedure<br />

as described by Gomez and Gomez (1984).<br />

691 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Results<br />

Yield Performance <strong>of</strong> Elephant Foot Yam and Black gram<br />

The higher yield response to the organic manure and inorganic fertilizers might be attributed to<br />

decomposition <strong>of</strong> organic manure as it improves the physical and biological properties and<br />

nutrient release pattern in to the soil and supplements the effect <strong>of</strong> inorganic fertilizers.<br />

Yield response (%)<br />

70<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

EFY Yield response (%) Black gram Yield response (%)<br />

Effect <strong>of</strong> organic and inorganic nutrients on yield <strong>of</strong> elephant foot yam and black gram<br />

Relationship <strong>of</strong> Available Nwith Inorganic nitrogen fractions and Availbale K with<br />

Inorganic Potassium fractions<br />

Significant positive correlation could be observed among the nitrogen fractions as these fractions<br />

are dependent on each other for their synthesis during mineralization process. The total K<br />

content <strong>of</strong> the soil showed highly significant correlation with non-exchangeable K (r=0.944 ** )<br />

and least with exchangeable K (r=0.875 ** ). The highest correlation was recorded in<br />

Exchangeable K (r = 0.979 ** ) followed by non-exchangeable K (r=0.927 ** ) and water soluble K<br />

(r=0.921 ** ).<br />

Conclusion<br />

Application <strong>of</strong> half <strong>of</strong> the recommended doses <strong>of</strong> NPK fertilizers in combination with organic<br />

manure (FYM) sustain the soil quality, and enhances the productivity and quality <strong>of</strong> elephant<br />

foot yam – black gram cropping system in acid Alfisols <strong>of</strong> Eastern India. Integrated application<br />

<strong>of</strong> organic manure and inorganic chemical fertilizers at balanced proportion not only helps to<br />

augment the crop yields but also enhances the available nutrient status as well as the yield and<br />

quality <strong>of</strong> elephant foot yam-black gram system. Cultivation <strong>of</strong> pulses as inter crops in between<br />

tropical root and tuber crops not only enhances the total farm productivity but also enrich the soil<br />

fertility by accumulation <strong>of</strong> its biomass that facilitates the biological activity <strong>of</strong> the soils.<br />

692 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />

during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

References<br />

Basumatary A. (2018). Integrated Sulphur Management in Rapeseed (Brassica camprestis) -<br />

Blackgram (Vigna mungo) sequence in an Inceptisol <strong>of</strong> Assam, Journal <strong>of</strong> the Indian<br />

Society <strong>of</strong> Soil Science, 66 (4): 425-431.<br />

Imai H, Kamata K and Yang YF. (1990). Developing Improved Cropping Systems for<br />

Vegetables and Legumes in the Tropics and Change in soil nutrient<br />

status, Japanese Journal <strong>of</strong> Tropical Agriculture, 34(3): 181-190.<br />

Laxminarayana and Pardhan, (2017). Effect <strong>of</strong> inorganic fertilizers and organic manures on<br />

microbial activities and yield <strong>of</strong> elephant foot yam (Amorphophallus paenifolius L) -<br />

black gram (Vigna mungo L) cropping system, IJSAR, 4(9), 2017; 47-63<br />

693 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture


Theme– 5<br />

Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones<br />

etc) for crop management & assessment


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Theme – 5: Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc.) for crop<br />

management & assessment<br />

List <strong>of</strong> <strong>Extended</strong> Summaries<br />

Title Title First Author ID<br />

1 Intercropping as ‘Ecological Precision Agriculture’<br />

to Address Field Heterogeneity<br />

2 Performance <strong>of</strong> Soybean, Pigeonpea Strip Cropping<br />

under Complete Mechanization for Rainfed Area <strong>of</strong><br />

Marathwada Region<br />

3 Real-Time Monitoring and Management <strong>of</strong> Drought<br />

in Groundnut<br />

4 Big Data Analytics for Identifying Districts with<br />

Untapped Potential in Rainfed Agriculture and<br />

Bridging Gaps<br />

5 A Mobile app for Unreaped Yield Potentials <strong>of</strong><br />

Major Rainfed Crops and Scope for Bridging Yield<br />

Gaps - A Decision Support System<br />

6 PASM induced yield variability in soybean crop at<br />

Akola conditions<br />

7 Development and Evaluation <strong>of</strong> DC Motor Powered<br />

Brush Cutter<br />

8 Modified Vegetative Drought Response Index<br />

(VegDRI) for Drought Risk Assessment <strong>of</strong> Andhra<br />

Pradesh<br />

9 Performance Evaluation <strong>of</strong> Mini Tractor Operated<br />

Rotary Weeder with L-Type Blades in Redgram<br />

Crop<br />

10 Sorghum Yield Response to Future Climate in a<br />

Semi-Arid Environment<br />

11 Stress Management in Wheat Crop through Foliar<br />

Spray <strong>of</strong> TGA Agro-chemical<br />

12 Effect <strong>of</strong> foliar application <strong>of</strong> different nano<br />

fertilizers on performance <strong>of</strong> rainfed maize in<br />

Southern Telangana<br />

13 Evaluation <strong>of</strong> Horse Gram Grain for Bio-<br />

Accessibility <strong>of</strong> Iron and Zinc by in-vitro Method<br />

14 Assessment <strong>of</strong> Soil Erodibility Indices for Beed<br />

Station<br />

15 Floor Management Machinery for Weed Control in<br />

Horticulture Crops<br />

16 Impact <strong>of</strong> eCO2 and eTemp. on Aphis craccivora<br />

Koch. on Groundnut and Projection <strong>of</strong> Future Pest<br />

Status<br />

Iman Raj<br />

Chongtham<br />

WN Narkhede<br />

B Sahadeva Reddy<br />

BMK Raju<br />

R Nagarjuna<br />

Kumar<br />

AR Tupe<br />

Ashish S Dhimate<br />

GS Pratyusha<br />

Kranthi<br />

VR Mallikarjuna<br />

MA Sarath<br />

Chandran<br />

RS Rathore<br />

KA Gopinath<br />

K Sreedevi<br />

Shankar<br />

M More Ram<br />

B Sanjeeva Reddy<br />

M Srinivasa Rao<br />

T5-01O-1063<br />

T5-02O-1343<br />

T5-03O-1210<br />

T5-03aO-1041<br />

T5-04R-1019<br />

T5-05R-1330<br />

T5-06R-1419<br />

T5-07R-1486<br />

T5-08R-1534<br />

T5-09R-1101<br />

T5-10P-1003<br />

T5-11P-1024<br />

T5-12P-1051<br />

T5-13P-1065<br />

T5-14P-1084<br />

T5-15P-1087<br />

Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment<br />

694 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Title Title First Author ID<br />

17 Mapping Quantitative Trait Nucleotides in Spring<br />

Wheat for Yield Performance under Limited Water<br />

Conditions<br />

18 Effect <strong>of</strong> Mechanization Practices on Economics <strong>of</strong><br />

Soyabean-Safflower Cropping System<br />

19 Effect <strong>of</strong> Nano-DAP Application in Combination<br />

with Conventional Fertilizers on Rice-Rapeseed<br />

Sequence under Rain-Fed Condition<br />

20 Effect <strong>of</strong> Nano fertilizers on Growth, Yield and<br />

Water Use Efficiency <strong>of</strong> Potato (Solanum<br />

tuberosum l.) under Varying Irrigation Schedules<br />

21 Soil Moisture and Weather Data Management Using<br />

IoT<br />

22 Comparative Study on Spatial and Temporal<br />

Changes in Urban Settlements and Land Surface<br />

Temperature in Hyderabad over 1990 to 2020<br />

23 Usefulness <strong>of</strong> Agro-Meteorological Advisory<br />

Service from Farmers Prospective in the NICRA<br />

Operated Villages <strong>of</strong> Godda District Jharkhand<br />

24 Use <strong>of</strong> UNEP Aridity Index for Drought Assessment<br />

in Bundelkhand<br />

25 FarmPrecise – An Agromet Advisory Service<br />

(AAS) for Sustainable Agriculture and Resilient<br />

Farm Income: An Impact Assessment <strong>of</strong> AAS in<br />

Ahmednagar, Dhule, and Jalna Districts <strong>of</strong><br />

Maharashtra<br />

26 Assessment <strong>of</strong> Biophysical Parameters and Disease<br />

Incidence in Mungbean Using Hyperspectral<br />

Radiometry<br />

27 Non-Destructive and Rapid Estimation <strong>of</strong> the Foliar<br />

Nitrogen <strong>of</strong> the Tomato Plant By Proximal<br />

Hyperspectral Remote Sensing Pl. Biochemical<br />

Properties: Nitrogen<br />

28 Assessment <strong>of</strong> Soil Fertility Constraints in<br />

Shrirampura Micro-Watershed, Turuvekere Taluk,<br />

Tumkur District, Karnataka Using Geospatial<br />

Techniques<br />

29 Assessing Impact <strong>of</strong> Dry Spells on Sorghum<br />

Productivity over Telangana State<br />

30 Investigations on Chopping-Cum-Tilling-Cum-<br />

Mixing Machine for Straw Incorporation<br />

31 Hyperspectral Reflectance: A Promising Tool to<br />

Assess the Metabolic Responses to Drought Stress<br />

in Sugarcane<br />

Sonia Sheoran<br />

SA Shinde<br />

Dhananjoy Dutta<br />

Manimala Mahato<br />

NS Raju<br />

Fawaz Parapurath<br />

Rajnish Prasad<br />

Rajesh<br />

Sunil Kumar<br />

Nikhil Nikam<br />

M Prabhakar<br />

Md Zafar<br />

KT Aruna<br />

Santanu Kumar<br />

Bal<br />

Abhishek patel<br />

Vinay Hegde<br />

T5-16P-1111<br />

T5-17P-1117<br />

T5-18P-1140<br />

T5-19P-1141<br />

T5-20P-1165<br />

T5-21P-1166<br />

T5-22P-1178<br />

T5-23P-1194<br />

T5-24P-1195<br />

T5-25P-1219<br />

T5-25P-1296<br />

T5-27P-1332<br />

T5-28P-1333<br />

T5-29P-1345<br />

T5-30P-1350<br />

695 | Page Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Title Title First Author ID<br />

32 Photo-Voltaic Solar Power: Alternative Energy for<br />

Farm Mechanization<br />

33 Design and Development <strong>of</strong> Planter for<br />

Intercropping Castor with Green Gram<br />

34 Leaf Propagation <strong>of</strong> Guava for Prevention <strong>of</strong> Root<br />

Knot Nematode<br />

35 Soil Moisture Indices Using Copernicus Soil Water<br />

Index for Drought Studies<br />

36 Soil Conservation Practices for Climate Change<br />

Adaptation in Bihar State<br />

37 Correlation <strong>of</strong> Weather Variables on the<br />

Development <strong>of</strong> Makhana Leaf Spot Disease in the<br />

Koshi Region <strong>of</strong> Bihar<br />

38 Study the Effect <strong>of</strong> Different Chemical on<br />

Biochemical and Functional Properties <strong>of</strong> Custard<br />

Apple (Annona squamosa L.) During Storage<br />

39 Cloud Computing, Data science for Big Data<br />

Management in Agriculture<br />

40 Feasibility <strong>of</strong> Appropriate Mechanization in<br />

Cultivation <strong>of</strong> Millets in Rainfed Eco System<br />

41 Small Scale Farm Mechanization: An Archangle to<br />

Climate Resilient Agriculture<br />

42 Predicting the generation index <strong>of</strong> groundnut<br />

bruchid, Caryedon serratus Olivier in India during<br />

future climate change scenario<br />

43 Indian Water Policy: Perspective <strong>of</strong> Rainwater<br />

Harvesting for Sustainability in Semi-Arid Regions<br />

Ravikant V Adake<br />

HS Chaudhary<br />

R Neelavathi<br />

KV Rao<br />

Pooja Jena<br />

Md Nadeem<br />

Akhtar<br />

Indraraj Ghasil<br />

R Lakshmi Sreya<br />

I Srinivas<br />

MV Tiwari<br />

TV Prasad<br />

K Sreenivas Reddy<br />

T5-31P-1373<br />

T5-32P-1379<br />

T5-33P-1417<br />

T5-34P-1491<br />

T5-35P-1528<br />

T5-36P-1535<br />

T5-37P-1538<br />

T5-38P-1589<br />

T5-39P-1598<br />

T5-40P-1711<br />

T5-41P-1616<br />

T5-42P-1621<br />

Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment<br />

696 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

T5-01O-1063<br />

Intercropping as ‘Ecological Precision Agriculture’ to Address Field<br />

Heterogeneity<br />

Iman Raj Chongtham*<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Biosystems and Technology, Swedish University <strong>of</strong> Agricultural Sciences,<br />

Lomma 234 22, Sweden.<br />

*raj.chongtham@slu.se<br />

During the last century, agricultural intensification with high use <strong>of</strong> external inputs such as<br />

pesticides, mineral fertilizers and crops grown as mono/sole crops has increased food<br />

production. However, such simplified and resource intensive agricultural practices are<br />

associated with causing environmental problems, notably biodiversity loss, development <strong>of</strong><br />

resistance to pesticides, climate change, and eutrophication (Gliessman, 2014). Dependence on<br />

one crop and external inputs can increase vulnerability <strong>of</strong> cropping system to natural disasters<br />

such as drought, the current COVID-19 pandemic (e.g. disruptions in supply chains) and high<br />

input prices due to conflicts (e.g. in Ukraine). Furthermore, crop production in organic systems<br />

is quite challenging as they have high spatial and temporal yield variability. Organic farmers<br />

have limited ‘quick and easy’ solutions such as chemical pesticides and fertilizers to deal with<br />

problems compared to conventional farmers (Chongtham et al., 2016). Intercropping (IC) can<br />

potentially address several <strong>of</strong> these challenges.<br />

Jensen et al. (2015) considered intercropping <strong>of</strong> non-legume crops (such as cereals) with grain<br />

legumes as an ‘ecological precision agriculture’ concept since the intercrop in a specific site<br />

will adjust its botanical composition, performances and acquisition <strong>of</strong> N from soil and fixation<br />

from atmosphere according to available soil mineral N by competitive interactions. This<br />

concept can be related to ‘stress gradient hypothesis’ in Ecology (Bertness and Callaway,<br />

1994), which assumes that the outcome <strong>of</strong> plant-plant interactions is dictated by environmental<br />

conditions, i.e. in harsh environment (e.g., from temperature or grazing) there will be more<br />

positive plant-plant interactions. However, there is lack <strong>of</strong> knowledge on the degree to which<br />

field-scale soil variability affects the competitive interactions between the IC components and<br />

use <strong>of</strong> available resources.<br />

This study aims to understand if intercropping can adapt to field heterogeneity more efficiently<br />

than their respective sole crops (SC) by suppressing weeds and producing higher and more<br />

stable yields.<br />

Methodology<br />

On alarge field with heterogeneous soil conditions, we measured soil ECa using EM-38 device.<br />

Based on this data, strips <strong>of</strong> crops: SC oat, SC pea and IC oat-pea (50%:50% seeding<br />

697 | Page Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

proportion) were laid along the field slope gradient. Strips were replicated five times in a<br />

randomised block design. Each strip was subdivided into 10 grids (along slope, N-S) and soil<br />

and crop measurements/samples were taken from the centroids <strong>of</strong> each grid, which were<br />

marked with gps (Fig. 1).Soil samples were analysed for soil texture, nitrogen, carbon and<br />

pH.Crops were sown at recommended seeding density: i.e. 320 plants per sq.m for SC oat, 80<br />

plants per sq.m for SC pea and half the seeding density <strong>of</strong> each crop in the intercrops. All<br />

treatments were applied 50 kg/ha <strong>of</strong> mineral N fertiliser, without any irrigation and other<br />

agrochemicals. At maturity, plant samples from 1 sq.m were hand-harvested from all the<br />

centroids and oven-dried for estimating grain and biomass weights.<br />

Results<br />

The study site received only 30mm <strong>of</strong> precipitation during 01 May-01 August in 2018, which<br />

was about one-fourth <strong>of</strong> the average precipitation during this period. This affected the crops,<br />

specially the pea. At harvest, oat yield tended to be higher in areas with high soil ECa values<br />

(conductivity).<br />

Plot layout on ECa map; Dry matter oat grain yield in Kg/ha on soil N heat map.<br />

In areas with low soil N content, IC seemed to have advantage over SC in terms <strong>of</strong> oat yield.<br />

On the other hand, yields <strong>of</strong> IC treatments tended to be equal or lower than SC oat yield in<br />

areas with high soil N content (Fig. 2). Average oat grain yield from all sampling points in IC<br />

was 2.6±1.65 t/ha (mean ± SD), despite having only 50% <strong>of</strong> the sole crop density, compared<br />

to 3.07±2.24 t/ha in oat SC strips. This corresponds to about 78% <strong>of</strong> SC yield. The highest<br />

weed biomass <strong>of</strong> 5.86 t/ha was recorded in SC pea, while the lowest weed in SC Oat (0.97<br />

t/ha). The IC treatment recorded a weed biomass <strong>of</strong> 3.27 t/ha.<br />

Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment<br />

698 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Dry matter weed biomass at harvest in t/ha<br />

Treatment emmean SE df Lower. CL Upper. CL Group<br />

SC Oat 0.97 0.22 139 0.54 1.41 1<br />

IC Oat-Pea 3.27 0.22 139 2.84 3.70 2<br />

SC Pea 5.86 0.21 139 5.43 6.28 3<br />

Conclusion<br />

Despite the pea crop failure due to drought, the oat yield in IC was about 78% <strong>of</strong> SC. IC reduced<br />

the vulnerability to weather extremes through complementarity function and crop<br />

diversification. High compensatory yield in IC inlow soil N areas may be attributed to<br />

compensation potential <strong>of</strong> intercrop partners. IC <strong>of</strong> oilseed rape and pea in a heterogeneous<br />

field is currently being tested by the authors.<br />

References<br />

Bertness M and Callaway RM. 1994. Positive interactions in communities. Trends Ecol. Evol.<br />

9.<br />

Chongtham IR, Bergkvist G, Watson CA, Sandstrom E, Bengtsson J and Oborn I. 2016. Factors<br />

influencing crop rotation strategies on organic farms with different time periods since<br />

conversion to organic production. Biol. Agric. Hortic. 33, 14–27.<br />

Gliessman SR. 2014. Agroeoclogy: the ecology <strong>of</strong> sustainable food systems, CRC press.<br />

Jensen ES, Bedoussac L, Carlsson G, Etienne-Pascal J, Justes E and Hauggaard-Nielsen H.<br />

2015. Enhancing yields in organic crop production by eco-functional intensification.<br />

Sustain. Agric. Res., 4 (3), 42-50.<br />

T5-02O-1343<br />

Performance <strong>of</strong> Soybean, Pigeonpea Strip Cropping under Complete<br />

Mechanization for Rainfed Area <strong>of</strong> Marathwada Region<br />

W. N. Narkhede, B. V. Asewar, M. S. Pendke, R. S. Raut, D. P. Waskar and<br />

A. S. Gunjkar<br />

All India Coordinated Research Project for Dryland Agriculture, Vasantrao Naik<br />

Marathwada Krishi Vidyapeeth, Parbhani (Maharashtra) India 431 402<br />

Strip cropping is a form <strong>of</strong> intercropping in which different crop species are cultivated in<br />

adjacent strips, allowing for independent, mechanical cultivation <strong>of</strong> each species. The strips<br />

are wide enough to be managed independently, yet they are narrow enough to allow crops that<br />

are rotated annually to influence the micro climate and yield potential <strong>of</strong> adjacent crops (Van<br />

1994). Strip intercropping can bring important agronomic and environmental benefits.<br />

699 | Page Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Temporal and spatial variation in strip-cropping plants minimizes competition between them<br />

and increase yield, and pr<strong>of</strong>itability. It reduces soil loss from wind and water erosion and<br />

reduce mineral leaching losses. than most mono cropping operations (Cruse1990). With this<br />

view, to minimize the labor requirement and increase the pr<strong>of</strong>itability, the experiment was<br />

conducted to study the various strip cropping for soybean and pigeonpea crops under<br />

mechanization with suitable ratio and to work out the economics feasibility <strong>of</strong> the strip<br />

cropping under mechanization<br />

Methodology<br />

The field experiment was conducted in randomized block design with eight treatments and<br />

three replications at Research Farm, AICRP on Dryland Agriculture, Vasantrao Naik<br />

Marathwada Krishi Vidyapeeth, Parbhani during Kharif 2018-20 and 2021-22. The treatments<br />

were allotted randomly in each replication. The recommended dose <strong>of</strong> fertilizer was applied<br />

to crop. Soybean and pigeonpea were sown at 45 cm X 5 cm and 90 cm X 20 cm respectively.<br />

A complete seed to seed mechanization was done in the experiment. The treatments were T 1-<br />

soybean: pigeonpea strip <strong>of</strong> 6:3 rows, T2- soybean: pigeonpea strip <strong>of</strong> 6:6 rows, T3- soybean:<br />

pigeonpea strip <strong>of</strong> 12:9 rows , T 4- soybean: pigeonpea strip <strong>of</strong> 12:12 rows ,T 5- soybean:<br />

pigeonpea strip <strong>of</strong> 18:12 rows T6- soybean: pigeonpea (4:2) intercropping system , T7- Sole<br />

soybean and T8- Sole pigeon pea.<br />

Results<br />

Sole pigeon pea recorded significantly higher soybean equivalent yield (2366 kg/ha.) which<br />

was followed by soybean + pigeon pea strip <strong>of</strong> 18:12 rows (1973 Kg/ha) and soybean +<br />

pigeonpea strip <strong>of</strong> 12:12 rows (1918 Kg/ha). Highest gross monetary return (GMR) were<br />

recorded in sole pigeonpea (Rs. 87244 /ha) which was followed by soybean + pigeonpea strip<br />

<strong>of</strong> 18:12 rows and soybean + pigeonpea strip <strong>of</strong> 12:12 rows. Significantly highest net monetary<br />

returns (NMR) were observed in sole pigeonpea (Rs. 57589 /ha.) which was followed by<br />

soybean + pigeonpea strip <strong>of</strong> 18:12 row (Rs. 48075 /ha). Sole pigeonpea recorded highest<br />

rainwater use efficiency (3.8) and B: C ratio (2.6) followed by in the treatment <strong>of</strong> soybean +<br />

pigeonpea strip <strong>of</strong> 18:12 row.<br />

The increase in the monetary returns due to increased yield and saving in cost <strong>of</strong> operation<br />

because <strong>of</strong> mechanization in soybean and pigeon pea was reported by Dhakad and Khedkar<br />

(2014). Strip-cropping can improve yields, pr<strong>of</strong>it margins Ghosh (2004).<br />

Conclusion<br />

Sole pigeon pea recorded significantly higher soybean seed yield, GMR, NMR and RWUE,<br />

Whereas, soybean + pigeon pea strip <strong>of</strong> 18.9 m each (18 & 12 rows/strip) recorded significantly<br />

higher B:C ratio.<br />

Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment<br />

700 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Soybean equivalent yield, GMR, NMR, BC ratio and RWUE<br />

Treatments<br />

T 1<br />

Soybean + Pigeon pea Strip <strong>of</strong> 5.4 m<br />

each (6 & 3 rows/strip)<br />

T 2<br />

Soybean + Pigeon pea Strip <strong>of</strong> 8.1 m each<br />

(6 & 6rows/strip)<br />

T 3<br />

Soybean + Pigeon pea Strip <strong>of</strong> 13.5 m<br />

each (12 & 9 rows/strip)<br />

T 4<br />

Soybean + Pigeon pea Strip <strong>of</strong> 16.2 m<br />

each (12 & 12 rows/strip)<br />

T 5<br />

Soybean + Pigeon pea Strip <strong>of</strong> 18.9 m<br />

each (18 & 12 rows/strip)<br />

T 6<br />

Soybean + Pigeon pea Strip at 4:2. rows<br />

intercropping system<br />

Soybean<br />

Equivalent<br />

yield<br />

(kg ha -1 )<br />

GMR<br />

(₹ ha -1 )<br />

NMR<br />

(₹ ha -1 )<br />

B:C<br />

ratio<br />

RWUE<br />

(kg/mm/ha)<br />

1697 60348 39891 2.5 2.7<br />

1853 69273 46964 2.7 3.0<br />

1723 62756 38860 2.3 2.8<br />

1918 70963 46723 2.5 3.1<br />

1973 73763 48075 2.5 3.1<br />

1350 47679 27264 2.1 2.2<br />

T 7<br />

Soybean Sole 1049 38754 18328 1.8 1.7<br />

T 8<br />

pigeonpea Sole 2366 87244 57589 2.6 3.8<br />

SE + 98 3460 2444 2.8<br />

CD (P= 0.05) 296 10386 7337 2.7<br />

C.V. 12 10.25 9.68 9.65<br />

Mean 1744 68274 44713 2.86 2.54<br />

References<br />

Cruse, R. M. and Weber, A. 1990. Strip intercropping. In Farming Systems for Iowa: Seeking<br />

Alternatives - Leopold Center for Sustainable Agriculture. Conference Proceedings.<br />

pp. 39-41.<br />

Dhakad, S. S. and Khedkar, N. S. 2014. Influence <strong>of</strong> seed-cum-fertilizer drill machine on the<br />

growth characters and yield <strong>of</strong> soybean (Glycine max. L. Merill.) at farmer’s fields.<br />

Int. J. For. Crop Imprvt., 5 (2): 68-72.<br />

Ghosh PK. 2004. Groundnut/cereal fodder intercropping systems in the semiarid tropics <strong>of</strong><br />

India. Field Crops Res., 88: 227–37.<br />

701 | Page Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

T5-03O-1210<br />

Real Time Monitoring and Management <strong>of</strong> Drought in Groundnut<br />

Sahadeva Reddy, A. Malliswara Reddy, K. Ashok Kumar, K.V.S. Sudheer,<br />

C. Radha Kumari, C. Yasmin, Ch. Murali Krishna, S. N. Malleswari and<br />

G. Ravindra Chary<br />

AICRP for Dryland Agriculture, Agricultural Research Station,<br />

Acharya N G Ranga Agricultural University, Ananthapuramu-515001, Andhra Pradesh<br />

Rainfed agriculture is likely to be more vulnerable to climate change because <strong>of</strong> its high<br />

dependency on monsoon and the chances <strong>of</strong> increased extreme weather events like delayed<br />

onset <strong>of</strong> monsoon, high intensity rainfall (wet spells), seasonal drought, early withdrawal <strong>of</strong><br />

monsoon etc. due to aberrant behaviour <strong>of</strong> south-west (SW) monsoon. Almost 56 per cent <strong>of</strong><br />

cropped area in Andhra Pradesh is under rainfed conditions where crop yields are largely<br />

influenced by the vagaries <strong>of</strong> the weather. Ananthapuramu region in the southern part <strong>of</strong><br />

Andhra Pradesh is the driest part <strong>of</strong> the state, climatically classified as arid zone and receives<br />

an annual precipitation <strong>of</strong> 553 mm against the atmospheric water demand (PET) <strong>of</strong> 2128 mm.<br />

Despite such precarious conditions, the area under groundnut is increasing and at present it is<br />

being cultivated in an extent <strong>of</strong> 5.0 lakh ha. Among the abiotic stresses, drought (moisture<br />

stress) is the major factor influencing the yield <strong>of</strong> rainfed crops. Variation in crop yields is more<br />

in dry lands due to the nonreceipt <strong>of</strong> timely rainfall and prolonged dry spells during crop<br />

periods. Monsoon failures results in drought which has serious implications for small and<br />

marginal farmers and livelihoods <strong>of</strong> the rural poor. Any contingency measure, either<br />

technology related (land, soil, water, crop) or institutional and policy based, which is<br />

implemented based on real time weather pattern (including extreme events) in any crop<br />

growing season is considered as real time contingency planning. Hence, this experiment on<br />

real time drought monitoring and management was planned for adapting to current climate<br />

risks and will help in getting higher yields.<br />

Methodology<br />

Field experiments were conducted at AICRPDA, Agricultural Research Station,<br />

Ananthapuramu (latitude <strong>of</strong> 14°41′ N, longitude <strong>of</strong> 77°40′ E and altitude <strong>of</strong> 350 meters above<br />

mean sea level) during kharif from 2019 to 2021 in rainfed Alfisols. The two treatments<br />

consist <strong>of</strong> Real time drought management (RTDM) with proven contingency measures during<br />

early, mid-season, terminal drought and rainfed (control) in groundnut (VarietyK6). Each<br />

treatment was laid out in an area <strong>of</strong> 1000 m 2 . The initial soil fertility was low in organic carbon<br />

(0.20%), low in available nitrogen (140 kg ha -1 ), high in available phosphorous (107 kg ha -1 )<br />

and low in available potassium (98 kg ha -1 ). Under RTDM in groundnut subsoiling @ 1m<br />

distance before sowing once in two years (2019 and 2021), formation <strong>of</strong> conservation furrows<br />

Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment<br />

702 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

@ 3.6 m interval @ 30 DAS in all three years, KNO3 spray @ 0.5% at dry spell at pegging<br />

stage during 2019 and supplemental irrigation with sprinklers with harvested rain water@ 20<br />

mm at pod initiation stage during 2021 was done. An amount <strong>of</strong> 517, 888 and 378 mm rainfall<br />

in 25,61 and 27 rainy days was received during the crop season <strong>of</strong> 2019, 2020 and 2021<br />

respectively. The rainwater use efficiency (RWUE, kg ha -1 mm -1 ) was derived as ratio <strong>of</strong> yield<br />

(kg ha -1 ) attained by a crop and crop seasonal rainfall (mm) <strong>of</strong> the respective crop in each year.<br />

The cost <strong>of</strong> cultivation <strong>of</strong> each crop was determined by considering inputs like seed and<br />

fertilizer costs and agricultural operations from sowing to harvest. The gross returns were<br />

computed as a product <strong>of</strong> yield <strong>of</strong> a crop and its market price (Rs. kg -1 ). The benefit-cost ratio<br />

was computed as a ratio <strong>of</strong> gross returns and cost <strong>of</strong> cultivation for each crop.<br />

Results<br />

During the three years <strong>of</strong> study, real time monitoring and management <strong>of</strong> drought in groundnut,<br />

recorded higher pod, haulm yield, gross, net returns, benefit cost ratio and rain water use<br />

efficiency as compared to rainfed (control). RTDM practice enhanced the pod and haulm yields<br />

by 31 and 23, 38.8 and 21.2 and 25.8 and 14.9 per cent respectively during 2019, 2020 and<br />

2021 respectively compared to control. This might be due to RTDM practice recorded higher<br />

soil moisture content and relative water content in different phenophases <strong>of</strong> groundnut. Higher<br />

yields were mainly due to increased availability <strong>of</strong> soil moisture by conservation <strong>of</strong> rainfall<br />

with deep tillage, conservation furrows and supplemental irrigation at critical stages <strong>of</strong> crop<br />

growth.<br />

Effect <strong>of</strong> Real time drought management (RTDM) practices in groundnut during kharif<br />

<strong>of</strong> 2019 to 2021<br />

Parameter 2019 2020 2021<br />

RTDM Control RTDM Control RTDM Control<br />

Pod yield (kg ha -1 ) 1660 1267 705 508 1370 1089<br />

Haulm yield (kg ha -1 ) 2985 2435 2360 1950 2245 1954<br />

Cost <strong>of</strong> cultivation (Rs. ha -1 ) 31250 27500 31750 28000 32250 29500<br />

Gross Returns (Rs. ha -1 ) 97932 75521 48460 36166 79725 64220<br />

Net Returns (Rs. ha -1 ) 66682 48021 16710 8166 47475 34720<br />

B:C ratio 3.13 2.75 1.52 1.29 2.47 2.18<br />

RWUE (kg ha -1 mm -1 ) 3.38 2.58 1.40 1.01 3.89 3.09<br />

Conclusion<br />

Real time monitoring and management <strong>of</strong> drought with subsoiling @1 m distance before sowing once<br />

in two years, formation <strong>of</strong> conservation furrows @ 3.6 m interval @ 30 DAS, KNO 3 spray @ 0.5% at<br />

dry spell and supplemental irrigation with sprinklers with harvested rain water @ 20 mm at pod<br />

development stage increases the pod yield, gross and net returns in ground growing areas <strong>of</strong> scarce<br />

rainfall zone.<br />

703 | Page Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment<br />

T5-03aO-1041<br />

Big Data Analytics for Identifying Districts with Untapped Potential in<br />

Rainfed Agriculture and Bridging Gaps<br />

B. M. K. Raju*, C. A. Rama Rao, R. Nagarjuna Kumar, K. V. Rao, V. K. Singh,<br />

Josily Samuel, A. V. M. Subba Rao, M. Osman and N. Swapna<br />

ICAR-Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, Santoshnagar, Hyderabad-500059<br />

* bmkraju@yahoo.com<br />

Government <strong>of</strong> India set a target <strong>of</strong> doubling farmers income by 2022-23. Niti Aayog target that onethird<br />

<strong>of</strong> the enhanced income should be contributed by yield increase. Other compelling forces for yield<br />

expansion in India are food & nutritional security and burden <strong>of</strong> importing oilseeds and pulses.<br />

Enhancing the productivities in rainfed agriculture is important from the perspective <strong>of</strong> inclusive<br />

agricultural growth. Climate, soil, irrigation and season (kharif/rabi) are the key drivers <strong>of</strong> productivity<br />

<strong>of</strong> a crop in a region. Farmer has no choice towards climate and soil while the factors <strong>of</strong> access to<br />

irrigation and season in which the crop is grown are relatively less amenable to changes. On the other<br />

hand, farmer has choice in case <strong>of</strong> factors like adoption <strong>of</strong> technologies such as improved variety,<br />

nutrient management, etc., which are relatively more amenable at farm level with appropriate policy<br />

and other interventions. If major districts <strong>of</strong> a crop are divided into clusters homogeneous in terms <strong>of</strong><br />

climate, soil, share <strong>of</strong> irrigated area under the crop and growing season the differences in productivity<br />

within the cluster can be majorly attributed to the factors that are amenable to changes. As the resources<br />

(that farmer has less or no choice) for raising the crop within a cluster are more or less same, the district<br />

producing highest yield in a cluster may be regarded as potential target and its yield as potential yield<br />

for the remaining districts in the cluster. Untapped yield potential (yield gap) for a district may be<br />

computed as the difference between potential yield and yield <strong>of</strong> the district (Raju et al., 2018). It is<br />

important to identify crop-wise districts where potential exists for yield growth in rainfed agriculture<br />

and explore the ways to bridge the gaps in order to achieve inclusive agricultural growth in India.<br />

Methodology<br />

Twenty important crops covering cereals, pulses, oilseeds and commercial crops are included in the<br />

study. Multivariate cluster analysis has been used for dividing major districts <strong>of</strong> a crop into clusters.<br />

The clustering variables used are moisture index, available water holding capacity <strong>of</strong> soil, per cent<br />

irrigated area under the crop and share <strong>of</strong> a particular season in area under the crop at district level.<br />

Moisture index (MI) was considered as a summarised indicator <strong>of</strong> various climatic variables. Available<br />

water holding capacity (AWHC) <strong>of</strong> the soil was considered as a summary indicator <strong>of</strong> soil properties<br />

such as soil texture and soil depth (Raju et al., 2015). Before carrying out the analysis, the clustering<br />

variables were standardized using mean and standard deviation. Ward’s agglomerative hierarchical<br />

clustering algorithm was employed to derive clusters from distance matrix computed using squared<br />

euclidean distance if the number <strong>of</strong> major districts is less than 200. K means clustering algorithm on<br />

euclidean distance was used in case <strong>of</strong> rice and wheat which were having more than 200 major districts.<br />

The analysis was carried out using SPSS. Criterion used for determining the number <strong>of</strong> clusters was to<br />

increase the number <strong>of</strong> clusters sequentially (one at a time) till share <strong>of</strong> intra-cluster variation goes<br />

704 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

below 5%. Yield efficiency <strong>of</strong> a district in a given crop is computed as the ratio <strong>of</strong> untapped yield and<br />

potential yield. Yield efficiency <strong>of</strong> less than 0.5 indicates scope for doubling <strong>of</strong> yield in the district. For<br />

each crop, the clusters <strong>of</strong> districts for which mean area under irrigation (as a percent <strong>of</strong> sown area) was<br />

less than 25% were considered as rainfed. Let Z is the rainfed yield efficiency <strong>of</strong> jth district with<br />

respect to ith crop predominantly cultivated under rainfed conditions then Overall Rainfed Yield<br />

Efficiency <strong>of</strong> jth district is Z = ∑ W Z where W ij = Proportion <strong>of</strong> area sown to i th crop<br />

(considering the crops which are predominantly cultivated under rainfed conditions) in j th district such<br />

that ∑ W = 1 (for all j).<br />

Results<br />

The resultant map showing overall rainfed yield efficiency at district level has been given as Fig 1. The<br />

number <strong>of</strong> districts having rainfed yield efficiency less than 0.5 are more in Madhya Pradesh (10),<br />

Rajasthan (8), Jharkhand (8), Tamil Nadu (6) and Orissa (5) states. Aggregate rainfed yield in these<br />

districts can be doubled. The variation in factors <strong>of</strong> crop management such as consumption <strong>of</strong> fertilizer<br />

nutrients <strong>of</strong> Nitrogen (N), Phosphorous (P) and Potassium (K) and adoption <strong>of</strong> technology such as extent<br />

<strong>of</strong> use <strong>of</strong> High Yielding Varieties (HYV) in the crop at district level are found to explain the variation<br />

in yield within a cluster to a large extent. Strategies were identified to improve yield efficiency in 60<br />

districts found to have low rainfed yield efficiency based on crop-wise gaps in adoption <strong>of</strong> HYV and<br />

nutrient use. A decision support system (DSS) has been developed which brings out untapped yield<br />

potential for a selected crop in a district. The DSS identifies 3 model districts and displays information<br />

on extent <strong>of</strong> adoption <strong>of</strong> HYVs and nutrient use in them indicating strategies for bridging yield gap in<br />

selected crop <strong>of</strong> the district. The DSS has been hosted on ICAR-CRIDA website at http://www.icarcrida.res.in:8129/.<br />

Overall rainfed yield efficiency at district level (with 20 crops)<br />

705 | Page Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Conclusion<br />

This study provides some inputs for formulation <strong>of</strong> policy for bridging the yield gaps existing in several<br />

districts practicing rainfed agriculture which eventually helps in reducing the burden <strong>of</strong> importing<br />

oilseeds and pulses and addressing the threatening food and nutrition security in India.<br />

References<br />

Raju, B.M.K., Osman, M., Venkateswarlu, B., Rao, A.V.M.S., Rao, K.V., Mishra, P.K., Rama<br />

Rao, C.A., Kareemulla, K., Anil Rai, Bhatia, V.K., Prachi Misra Sahoo, Malhotra, P.K.,<br />

Sikka, A.K., Swapna, N. and Latha, P., 2015. Prioritization <strong>of</strong> rainfed areas in India<br />

based on natural resource endowments. Journal <strong>of</strong> the Indian Society <strong>of</strong> Agricultural<br />

Statistics, 69(1), 83-93.<br />

Raju, B.M.K., Rama Rao, C.A., Rao, K.V., Srinivasa Rao, Ch., Josily Samuel, Subba Rao, A.V.M.,<br />

Osman, M., Srinivasa Rao, M., Ravi Kumar, N., Nagarjuna Kumar, R., Sumanth Kumar, V.V.,<br />

Gopinath, K.A. and Swapna, N., 2018. Assessing unrealized yield potential <strong>of</strong> maize producing<br />

districts in India. Current Science,114 (9), 1885-1893.<br />

Raju, B.M.K., Rao, K.V., Venkateswarlu, B., Rao, A.V.M.S., Rama Rao, C.A., Rao, V.U.M., Bapuji<br />

Rao, B., Ravi Kumar, N., Dhakar, R., Swapna, N. and Latha, P., 2013. Revisiting climatic<br />

classification in India: a district-level analysis. Current Science, 105 (4), 492-495.<br />

T5-04R-1019<br />

A Mobile app for Unreaped Yield Potentials <strong>of</strong> Major Rainfed Crops and<br />

Scope for Bridging Yield Gaps - A Decision Support System<br />

R. Nagarjuna Kumar*, B. M. K. Raju, C. A. Rama Rao, Josily Samuel,<br />

A. V. M. Subbarao, M. Srinivas Rao, G. Nirmala, N. S. Raju and V. K. Singh<br />

ICAR-Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, Hyderabad-500059, Telangana, India<br />

*nagarjunakumar191@gmail.com<br />

Bridging yield gaps is recognized as an important element <strong>of</strong> the strategy for raising<br />

productivity and farm incomes. Identifying and targeting districts, the administrative units at<br />

which most <strong>of</strong> the development planning and resource allocation is done in the country, where<br />

considerable yield gaps exist will be useful in planning interventions needed. With this,<br />

districts with considerable yield gaps were identified (Raju et al., 2013,2018) and was made<br />

available in the form <strong>of</strong> a Decision Support System (DSS)(http://www.icar-crida.res.in:8129/.).<br />

In this scenario, it is expected that integration <strong>of</strong> ICTs in agricultural extension will provide<br />

needed impetus to agricultural sector and ICTs can complement the traditional extension<br />

system for “Knowledge Resource” delivery to the millions <strong>of</strong> the farmers (Saravanan, 2010).<br />

To facilitate this mobile based technology dissemination in agriculture provides significant<br />

opportunity for farmers and extension workers to work together more effectively. Mobile<br />

Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment<br />

706 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

phone‐enabled information delivery mechanism can help to meet the information needs <strong>of</strong><br />

small farmers by reducing their knowledge gaps. Therefore, a mobile app for Unreaped Yield<br />

Potentials <strong>of</strong> Major Rainfed Crops and Scope for Bridging Yield Gaps ‘was developed based<br />

on developed DSS. It is very useful for the policy makers, researchers, extension workers.<br />

Methodology<br />

It is an android-based app. The database <strong>of</strong> the app has been designed using SQlite. User<br />

Interfaces were designed. Integrated all the menus and database. This App has been tested with<br />

different datasets and evaluated for its user-friendly environment. The App accommodated 17<br />

rainfed crops viz., rice, sorghum, pearlmillet, maize, fingermillet, chickpea, pigeonpea,<br />

blackgram, greengram, lentil, groundnut, soybean, sunflower, sesame, rapeseed & mustard,<br />

castor and cotton. User has to select a crop and a district cultivating the crop.<br />

Results<br />

The App lists the model districts for a given crop and target District and indicates possible crop<br />

management for bridging yield gap. The App identifies 3 model districts having climate, soil,<br />

share <strong>of</strong> irrigated area under the crop and share <strong>of</strong> a particular season in area under the crop<br />

similar to the district (target) selected.<br />

The APP provides climate and available water holding capacity (AWHC) <strong>of</strong> soil <strong>of</strong> the district,<br />

area under the crop and share <strong>of</strong> irrigated area and share <strong>of</strong> a particular season (in case <strong>of</strong> rice,<br />

sorghum, maize, blackgram and greengram) in area under the crop and yield <strong>of</strong> the district in<br />

the crop. It further provides yield achieved by model districts. If the target district itself is the<br />

highest yielding district in the cluster, a remark to this effect is generated. If there are only 1 or<br />

2 districts with yield more than that <strong>of</strong> target district in a cluster, only those districts will be<br />

listed as model districts. The highest yield among the model districts may be regarded potential<br />

yield. To explore other possible causes <strong>of</strong> yield gap, information on non-crop specific factors<br />

such as small and marginal farmers (% total farmers), annual rainfall (mm), degraded and waste<br />

lands (% geographical area), groundwater availability (ha m/ sq km), livestock population<br />

(ACU/sq km), rural literacy (%), villages having self-help groups (%), net irrigated area (% net<br />

sown area), villages with all-weather roads (%), households with electricity (%), regulated<br />

markets (No. / lakh holdings), drought proneness (% probability in terms <strong>of</strong> severe drought),<br />

flood proneness (% area) and cyclone proneness (score on 0-10 scale) were provided for target<br />

district and 3 model districts. The output can be downloaded as word file or in Excel sheet<br />

format for further use. The output <strong>of</strong> mobile app is shown below.<br />

707 | Page Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Conclusion<br />

The output <strong>of</strong> Mobile App<br />

The spread <strong>of</strong> mobile telephony is a significant opportunity for farmers, extension workers and<br />

other stakeholders to work together more effectively. The mobile app ‘Unreaped Yield<br />

Potentials <strong>of</strong> Major Rainfed Crops and Scope for Bridging Yield Gaps’ was developed<br />

indicates possible crop management for bridging yield gap. which can help the policy makers,<br />

researchers, extension workers.<br />

References<br />

Raju, B. M. K., Rao, K.V., Venkateswarlu B., Rao, A. V. M. S., Rama Rao C.A., Rao, V. U. M., Bapuji<br />

Rao B, Ravi Kumar N., Dhakar R., Swapna, N., and Latha, P. 2013. Revisiting climatic<br />

classification in India: a district-level analysis. Curr. Sci. 105 (4), 492-495.<br />

Raju B. M. K., Rama Rao C. A., Rao, K.V., Srinivasa Rao, Ch., Josily Samuel, Subba Rao A. V. M.,<br />

Osman M, Srinivasa Rao, M., Ravi Kumar N., Nagarjuna Kumar R., Sumanth Kumar V.V,<br />

Gopinath, K. A. and Swapna, N. 2018. Assessing unrealized yield potential <strong>of</strong> maize producing<br />

districts in India. Curr. Sci 114 (9), 1885-1893.<br />

NSSO, (2005). Access to modern technology for farming, situation assessment survey <strong>of</strong> farmers, 59th<br />

Round. Report No. 499, National Sample Survey Organisation (NSSO), Ministry <strong>of</strong> Statistics<br />

and Programme Implementation, Government <strong>of</strong> India, New Delhi.<br />

Saravanan R. 2010. ICTs for Agricultural Extension: Global Experiments, Innovations and<br />

Experiences. New India Publishing Agency, New Delhi.<br />

Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment<br />

708 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

T5-05R-1330<br />

PASM Induced Yield Variability in Soybean Crop at Akola conditions<br />

A. R. Tupe * , A. P. Karunakar, M. M. Ganvir, A. B. Chorey, R. S. Patode,<br />

V. V. Gabhane , S. T. Morey and R. S. Mali<br />

Dr. Panjabrao Deshmukh Krishi Vidyapeeth, Akola -444 104 (Maharashtra)<br />

*tupearvind@rediffmail.com<br />

Drought <strong>of</strong> different magnitude is becoming a common phenomenon, which affects adversely<br />

on Indian agriculture. Available soil moisture is a very relevant indicator <strong>of</strong> drought, especially<br />

in rainfed region. Soil moisture-based indices could be calculated using a simple region wide<br />

soil moisture balance methodology which entails collecting some <strong>of</strong> the base line data related<br />

to soil properties, climatic parameters and crop growth pattern, basically, soil moisture balance<br />

calculates the amount <strong>of</strong> rainfall available to crops depending upon crop water requirement,<br />

climatic evaporation demand and soil water holding capacity. It is suggested that one <strong>of</strong> the<br />

soil moisture based indices viz., Percent Available Soil Moisture (PASM) is used. These<br />

indices may be calculated at weekly interval and averages over dominant crop growth stages<br />

such as vegetative, flowering and pod development. These indices should be combined with<br />

other indicators for the determination <strong>of</strong> drought.<br />

Methodology<br />

A field experiment was initiated on the research field <strong>of</strong> AICRP for Dryland Agriculture, Dr.<br />

Panjabrao Deshmukh Krishi Vidyapeeth, Akola, Maharashtra since 2010 to 2018. Experiment<br />

was conducted in a factorial randomized block design with four replications. The treatment<br />

under study were four dates <strong>of</strong> sowing times in deferent Meteorological weeks such as 26 th MW,<br />

27 th MW, 28 th MW, 29 st MW and three cultivar such as JS-335, JS-9305, TAMS-98-21 was sown<br />

at a spacing <strong>of</strong> 45x5 cm. the gross plot size 5 x 4.5 m and net plot size was 3.6 x 4.6 m. All the<br />

recommended agronomic practices were adopted during the experimental period.<br />

The data on the occurrence <strong>of</strong> specific phenophagical stages <strong>of</strong> soybean observed during the<br />

experimental period in the three cultivars under different growing environment and soil<br />

moisture at different depth to assess the effect <strong>of</strong> soil moisture on different growth stages and<br />

final seed yield. Long term Crop - weather and moisture depletion pattern in soybean shown<br />

that the Percent Available Soil Moisture (PASM) should not go below 50 percent for normal<br />

crop growth. The results shows that relationship between PASM (%) and Soybean seed yield<br />

(Kg/ha) for the year 2008-2018.<br />

709 | Page Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Crop Situation based indices<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

Percent Available Soil Moisture (PASM)<br />

PASM = [(SMW - PWP) / (FC – PWP)] * 100<br />

SMw : weekly soil moisture (vol/vol)<br />

FC: Field capacity <strong>of</strong> soil vol/vol<br />

PWP: Permanent wilting point <strong>of</strong> soil (vol/vol)<br />

Frequency: weekly<br />

Initiation: with the dates <strong>of</strong> actual sowing<br />

Averaging: over dominant crop growth stages, viz., vegetative growth, flowering and<br />

pod development stage<br />

Level <strong>of</strong> PASM<br />

Results<br />

PASM (%)<br />

Agricultural Drought Class<br />

76 - 100 No drought<br />

51 - 75 Mild drought<br />

26 – 50 Moderate drought<br />

0 – 25 Severe drought<br />

Soil water content, phonological characteristics yield, and yield components <strong>of</strong> soybean were<br />

collected. The long-term field experiments (2008- 2018) were conducted in soybean to study<br />

the relationship <strong>of</strong> per cent available soil moisture (PASM) on seed yield. Level <strong>of</strong> the PASM<br />

were classified as severe, moderate, mild and no drought based on the yield performance <strong>of</strong> the<br />

crop. The analyzed results indicated that at vegetative stage the lowest seed yield recorded i.e.<br />

597 kg/ha at 12 PASM treated as severe drought class whereas highest seed yield i.e. 1925<br />

kg/ha at 66 PASM treated as mild drought. At flowering stage the lowest seed yield recorded<br />

i.e. 1040 kg/ha at 14 PASM treated as severe drought class whereas highest seed yield i.e. 1719<br />

kg/ha at 60 PASM treated as mild drought and at pod development stage the lowest seed yield<br />

recorded i.e. 702 kg/ha at 11 PASM treated as severe drought class whereas highest seed yield<br />

i.e. 1896 kg/ha at 64 PASM treated as mild drought. The PASM values recorded at different<br />

stage <strong>of</strong> soybean indicated that moderate drought class gave 40 % <strong>of</strong> optimum yield during<br />

vegetative stage <strong>of</strong> the crop. From the overall study, the following PASM values may be<br />

followed as in impact criterion for declaring drought after the mandatory criteria <strong>of</strong> rainfall/SPI<br />

(Standardized Precipitation Index) deficiencies are triggered on.<br />

Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment<br />

710 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Soybean: 11- 14 PASM as severe, 33-40 PASM as moderate, > 60 PASM as no drought<br />

Statistical analysis linearly express that the correlation between PASM values and soybean<br />

seed yield as 0.51<br />

Relationship between PASM (%) and Soybean seed yield (Kg/ha) during 2008-2018 at<br />

different growth stages<br />

Treatments Drought class PASM % Yield Correlation<br />

Vegetative<br />

Flowering<br />

Pod Development<br />

Severe 12 597<br />

Moderate 40 1216<br />

Mild 66 1925<br />

No 94 1405<br />

Severe 14 1040<br />

Moderate 33 1020<br />

Mild 60 1719<br />

No 89 1435<br />

Severe 11 702<br />

Moderate 33 1288<br />

Mild 64 1896<br />

No 84 1399<br />

0.72<br />

711 | Page Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Conclusion<br />

Relationship between PASM and Seed yield (kg/ha)<br />

<br />

<br />

Increase in realization percent <strong>of</strong> yield as per increase in the PASM per cent clearly<br />

shows the effect <strong>of</strong> PASM per cent on yield. Present study highlights the necessity to<br />

understand PASM as One <strong>of</strong> the Impact Criteria for Drought Declaration for soybean<br />

crop for the region before planning and management.<br />

From the overall study, the PASM values may be followed as in impact criterion for<br />

declaring drought after the mandatory criteria <strong>of</strong> rainfall/SPI (Standardized<br />

Precipitation Index) deficiencies are triggered on.<br />

References:<br />

Anonymous, 2002, Drought 2002. Department <strong>of</strong> Agriculture and Cooperation, Ministry <strong>of</strong><br />

Agriculture, New Delhi.<br />

Anonymous,2016. Manual for Drought Management, published by Department <strong>of</strong> Agriculture,<br />

Cooperation and Farmers Welfare, Ministry <strong>of</strong> Agriculture and Farmers welfare, GoI,<br />

New Delhi.<br />

NRAA, 2013. Contingency and Compensatory Agriculture Plans for Droughts and Floods in<br />

India-2012, Position paper No.6, 877.<br />

Proceedings <strong>of</strong> 4 th International Conference on Dry Zone Agriculture 2018. Faculty <strong>of</strong><br />

Agriculture, University <strong>of</strong> Jaffna, Sri Lanka, 1 st & 2 nd <strong>of</strong> November 2018. Page No. 81.<br />

Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment<br />

712 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

T5-06R-1419<br />

Development and Evaluation <strong>of</strong> DC Motor Powered Brush Cutter<br />

Ashish S. Dhimate, I. Srinivas, B. S. Reddy, R. V. Adake, G. Pratibha,<br />

Mallikarjuna Reddy and S. Vijaya Kumar<br />

ICAR-Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, Hyderabad, Telangana-500059, India<br />

Nowadays, engine operated brush cutters are well popular among the farmer for various<br />

operation like grass cutting, paddy harvesting etc. The brush cutter is mostly run with fossil<br />

fuel like petrol. However, depletion <strong>of</strong> fossil fuel and day by day increase in their price, and<br />

pollution are the main challenges in use <strong>of</strong> fossil fuel. To overcome the expensive using cost<br />

and the carbon dioxide released problems, there have been concerned by many countries in the<br />

recent years (Chieh-Tsung Chi, 2012). Moreover, Government <strong>of</strong> India (GOI) promoting the<br />

use <strong>of</strong> renewable resources (Anonymous 2018) to meet the ever-rising energy demand in India.<br />

Therefore, the use <strong>of</strong> power storage technology (battery) for harnessing energy is gaining<br />

popularity for use in agricultural machinery (Sahoo and Rehman 2020). The recent scenario<br />

has increases the scope <strong>of</strong> battery technology for carrying out some <strong>of</strong> agricultural activity like<br />

weeding, harvesting etc. Further, it was observed that most <strong>of</strong> battery-operated machinery has<br />

less noise and vibration compared to engine-based machinery. Sahoo and Raheman 2020,<br />

developed vertical conveyor reaper. From the study, it was observed that developed e-reaper<br />

does not produce any exhaust emission, moreover the noise and vibration were 4.34% and<br />

49.89%, lesser, respectively. The cost <strong>of</strong> operation with the developed e-reaper was 63% lesser<br />

than the traditional method <strong>of</strong> harvesting. It also reviewed that estimation <strong>of</strong> charging cost <strong>of</strong><br />

battery per using time is generally lower than that needed by the internal combustion engine<br />

type. Hence, it was decided to develop a DC motor powered brush cutter for Indian farmers<br />

with small size land holdings to reduce the cost <strong>of</strong> cultivation.<br />

Methodology<br />

Description <strong>of</strong> developed Electric brush cutter<br />

Newly developed brush cutter consist battery unit, permanent magnet DC motor, motor speed<br />

controller, Coupler, Hallow Pipe and spline shaft, gear head, cutting blade, crop gathering unit,<br />

etc. Total weight <strong>of</strong> prototype is 11.5 kg including battery. Operation <strong>of</strong> developed prototype<br />

is similar to engine operated brush cutter. The battery is fixed in shoulder mounted sack and its<br />

whole weight carried by both shoulders equally.<br />

Performance evaluation <strong>of</strong> e‐brush cutter<br />

The performance <strong>of</strong> the developed DC motor powered brush cutter was evaluated in laboratory<br />

and field at ICAR-Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, Hyderabad. It was tested<br />

on finger millet crop stem after harvesting ear-head. The remaining stem <strong>of</strong> the finger millet is<br />

713 | Page Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

precious fodder for livestock. Therefore, harvesting trail conducted on these standing stems to<br />

cut it and used as fodder.<br />

Experimental design<br />

The developed prototype tested on finger millet crop. The performance parameters like<br />

Electric Energy requirement, Watthour, Electric Power Requirement, Watt, field capacity,<br />

cutting efficiency, battery run time, height <strong>of</strong> cut during the operation were measured.<br />

Detail specifications <strong>of</strong> DC powered brush cutter<br />

SI. No. Particulars Specification<br />

1. Weight 11.5 kg<br />

2. Battery capacity 18 Ah<br />

3.<br />

Motor Type and<br />

Power<br />

DC motor<br />

120/150/250 watt<br />

4. Motor speed 4000 rpm<br />

5. Motor speed controller Available<br />

Field crop parameter<br />

The performance evaluation <strong>of</strong> machine conducted on Finger millet stem.<br />

Sr. No. Crop Parameters Finger millet stem<br />

1 Height <strong>of</strong> crop, cm 80<br />

2 Crop density, hill/m 2 22<br />

3 No. <strong>of</strong> hills per m 2 22<br />

4 Plant per hill 7-8<br />

5 Row to row spacing, cm 45<br />

6 Hill to hill spacing, cm 10-18<br />

7 Stem diameter, cm 0.8-1.2<br />

8 Hill diameter, cm 10<br />

9 Biomass per m 2 , kg 2.5<br />

Results<br />

The developed brush cutter cuts the crop from bottom and windrow it in left side <strong>of</strong> operator.<br />

The operator can operate it by fixing machine on one shoulder with shoulder strap and swinging<br />

it from right to left. The performance evaluation <strong>of</strong> developed prototype conducted on finger<br />

millet crop stem. The field capacity was observed 250m 2 per hour with 15 min rest time.<br />

Further, it was found that the developed brush cutter could work effectively for 1.5-2 h<br />

continuously in one charging. The cutting efficiency <strong>of</strong> 95% was found with developed brush<br />

cutter. The cutting width <strong>of</strong> brush cutter for finger millet was 80-100 cm was found suitable to<br />

avoid clogging. It was also observed that developed prototype produces lesser noise and<br />

minimum vibration as compared to engine operated brush cutter. The maximum power<br />

Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment<br />

714 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

requirement by brush cutter at the time <strong>of</strong> cutting stroke was found to be 110 watt and it may<br />

vary according to crop type and plant density.<br />

References<br />

Anonymous (2018) National Energy Policy (NEP) Draft, NITI Aayog, GOI, 2017:<br />

http://niti.gov.in/write readd ata/files /new_initi ative s/ NEP-ID_27.06.2017.pdf.<br />

Chieh-Tsung Chi (2012) A new electric brush cutter. WSEAS Trans Syst Control 3(7):2224–<br />

2856.<br />

Sahoo A U and Raheman Hifjur (2020) Development <strong>of</strong> an electric reaper: a clean harvesting<br />

machine for cereal crops. Clean Technol. Environ. Policy, 22: 955–964.<br />

T5-07R-1486<br />

Modified Vegetative Drought Response Index (VegDRI) for Drought Risk<br />

Assessment <strong>of</strong> Andhra Pradesh<br />

G. S. Pratyusha Kranthi 1 , K. V. Rao 1 and K. Padmakumari 2<br />

1 ICAR-Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, Hyderabad<br />

2 Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University, Kakinada<br />

Drought risk is a product <strong>of</strong> a region’s exposure to the climate hazard and its vulnerability to<br />

extended periods <strong>of</strong> water shortage (Wilhite, 1985). Since there is a strong relationship between<br />

poverty and drought proneness <strong>of</strong> a region, there is a need to understand and address the risk<br />

associated with drought. Risk assessment reduces the impacts <strong>of</strong> drought through mitigation<br />

and preparedness and help in decision-making process for policy makers. Drought hazard and<br />

risk assessments are <strong>of</strong>ten established for the current climate situation; these assessments make<br />

use <strong>of</strong> historical datasets <strong>of</strong> drought hazards, drought impacts, and information about exposure<br />

and vulnerability to drought. Agricultural drought risk assessment is done by analysing rainfall<br />

and evapotranspiration data. However, this approach lacks spatial and temporal variability.<br />

Spatial and temporal analysis through remote sensing (RS) and geographic information system<br />

(GIS) has greatly felicitated drought risk assessment by identifying drought risk zones and<br />

prioritizing based on risk level. Detection, monitoring <strong>of</strong> drought requires accurate and<br />

continuous information, which may not be effectively collected through conventional methods.<br />

RS and GIS make it possible to obtain continuous information over larger areas. A study on<br />

drought risk assessment in rainfed areas <strong>of</strong> Andhra Pradesh using spatial and temporal analysis<br />

was framed using modified Vegetative Drought Response Index (VegDRI) for crops <strong>of</strong><br />

different crop durations and for different soil types at varying depths.<br />

715 | Page Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Methodology<br />

VegDRI model was produced by the National Drought Mitigation Centre (NDMC) in<br />

collaboration with USGS and Centre for Earth Resources Observation and Science (EROS)<br />

and the High Plains Regional Climate Center (HPRCC). According to methodology proposed<br />

by Wardlow et al., the VegDRI Model consists <strong>of</strong> three primary steps. The first step was to<br />

process, summarize, and organize the data for the eight variables used in VegDRI model into<br />

a database. A 16-year (2000 – 2015) historical record <strong>of</strong> climate-based drought index and<br />

satellite-derived vegetation indices (VI) observations and information from four temporally<br />

static biophysical variables were included in the training database. For present study area, each<br />

variable information was summarized for 70 weather stations and sequentially ordered in the<br />

database for model development. The second step was to generate an empirically derived<br />

model by applying a supervised classification and regression-tree (CART) analysis technique<br />

to information in the database. The third step was to apply the models to the geospatial data to<br />

produce a 500 m resolution VegDRI map for the study area. The VegDRI map contains seven<br />

categories <strong>of</strong> varying levels <strong>of</strong> drought-induced vegetation stress, based on the PDSI drought<br />

classification (Palmer, 1965). In modified VegDRI model, instead <strong>of</strong> using biweekly AVHRR<br />

NDVI as mentioned in the original methodology MODIS NDVI data generated from daily<br />

surface reflectance data (MOD09A1) was used under satellite variables. Similar approach was<br />

used by Yonatan (2013) and Won-Ho Nam (2017). One <strong>of</strong> the biophysical variable landuse<br />

landcover (LULC) was confined to kharif crops and irrigated areas were also masked.<br />

Results<br />

VegDRI, the depiction <strong>of</strong> vegetation stress across the study area indicated that the growth <strong>of</strong><br />

long duration crops like redgram during kharif was near-to-normal during the study period<br />

except the years 2001, 2004 and 2015. During the years 2001 and 2015, the crop exhibited<br />

near-to-normal conditions in 60 and 65 percent locations, respectively. However, pre-drought<br />

stress also occurred in 35 percent locations during these years and mediocre drought was<br />

observed in 5 percent locations during 2001. Whereas the year 2004, was predominantly predrought<br />

stress in 65 percent locations and near-to-normal in 35 percent locations. Thus,<br />

VegDRI index indicated mostly near-to-normal condition <strong>of</strong> redgram in the study area during<br />

the study period. VegDRI index for short duration crops like greengram was near-to-normal<br />

during the study period in more than 50 percent <strong>of</strong> the locations except during 2008, 2010 and<br />

2013. During these years (2008, 2010, 2013), unusually moist situation existed in more than<br />

50 percent locations. The year 2015 exhibited near-to-normal and unusually moist situations in<br />

equivalent areas.<br />

Irrespective <strong>of</strong> soil type or depth the VegDRI index was near-to-normal in case <strong>of</strong> redgram and<br />

near-to-normal to unusually moist in case <strong>of</strong> greengram in the entire study area during the study<br />

period. In redgram, pre-drought condition was observed only during 2001 and 2004 in deep<br />

Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment<br />

716 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

clay soil, 2001 in shallow clay soil and during 2004 and 2015 in shallow loam soils. In deep<br />

loam soils the crop performance was near-to-normal during the entire study period. Whereas<br />

in greengram unusually moist situations existed irrespective <strong>of</strong> the soil type and depth during<br />

2010 and 2013. However, the same situation was noted during 2008 and 2015 in both deep and<br />

shallow loam soils and during 2000, 2003, 2005 and in deep loam soils during 2007 alone.<br />

The relation established between rainfall and VegDRI also reported that the linear function<br />

represented data more than 50 percent during the entire study period. The predictive efficiency<br />

<strong>of</strong> the linear term (b) and the determination coefficient (R 2 ) was high in redgram and moderate<br />

to high in greengram. The total explained variation in the estimation <strong>of</strong> the crop performance<br />

by VegDRI index in relation to rainfall was 0.58 to 0.96. The explained variation <strong>of</strong> more than<br />

0.75 for the entire study period makes VegDRI index dependable in the estimation <strong>of</strong> redgram<br />

performance in response to soil moisture availability and is more than 0.5 for greengram.<br />

Conclusions<br />

From the above results it can be inferred that, input from the spectral signatures <strong>of</strong> the crop<br />

canopy besides ground-based information had made VegDRI more agreeable for different soil<br />

types, soil depths and crop types. A similar result was mentioned by Won-Ho Nam et al., where<br />

PDSI delayed or lagged in the drought assessment since the data depend on soil moisture,<br />

whereas VegDRI-SKorea was useful for more timely detection <strong>of</strong> improvement in drought<br />

conditions compared to the station-based self-calibrated PDSI. Crops like greengram being<br />

sturdier and with quick canopy coverage might have been analysed easily by VegDRI for crop<br />

condition based on moisture availability. According to Brown et al., (2008) any subtle change<br />

in vegetation conditions when there is low green biomass can result in greater fluctuations in<br />

NDVI values as compared to later in the growing season when slight changes in vegetation<br />

with higher biomass result in less change in the NDVI values.<br />

References<br />

Brown, J. F., Wardlow, B.D., Tadesse, T., Hayes, M. J., and Reed, B. C. 2007. The vegetation<br />

drought response index (VegDRI): A new integrated approach for monitoring drought<br />

stress in vegetation, In Press. GI Sci. Rem. Sens.<br />

Palmer, W. C. 1965. Meteorological drought. Office <strong>of</strong> Climatology Research Paper 45,<br />

Weather Bureau, Washington DC, 58 pp.<br />

Wilhite, D. A. and Glantz, M. H. 1985. Understanding the drought phenomenon: The role <strong>of</strong><br />

definitions. Water Int., 10:111–120<br />

Won-Ho Nam, Tsegaye Tadesse, Brian D, Wardlow, Michael Hayes J, Mark D. Svoboda, Eun-<br />

Mi Hong, Yakov A. Pachepsky and Min-Won Jang. 2018. Developing the vegetation drought<br />

717 | Page Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

response index for South Korea (VegDRI-SKorea) to assess the vegetation condition<br />

during drought events. Int. J. Rem. Sens. 39:1548–1574.<br />

Yonatan Getachew 2013. Analysing the Effect <strong>of</strong> High-Resolution Satellite Images for<br />

Drought Prediction. Addis Ababa University School <strong>of</strong> Graduate Studies College <strong>of</strong><br />

Natural Sciences. Department <strong>of</strong> Computer Science.<br />

T5-08R-1534<br />

Performance Evaluation <strong>of</strong> Mini Tractor Operated Rotary Weeder with L-<br />

Type Blades in Redgram Crop<br />

V. R. Mallikarjuna 1 , B. Sanjeeva Reddy 1 and A. K. Dave 2<br />

1<br />

ICAR - Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, Hyderabad.<br />

2 FMPE, IGKV, Raipur (C.G.)<br />

India is the largest producer and consumer <strong>of</strong> redgram in the world. Redgram also known as<br />

Pigeon pea (Arhar or tur in local language) is an important legume and pulse crop <strong>of</strong> India and<br />

is being cultivated on 35.50 lakh ha area with a production <strong>of</strong> 4.43 Million tones in 2021-2022<br />

(ANGRAU Outlook report, 2021). Among total pulses production, redgram accounts for<br />

14.5% in area and 15.5% in productivity. Maharashtra is the largest producer with<br />

approximately 12.47 lakh ha area with average productivity <strong>of</strong> 11.31 Q/ha. Redgram as a pulse<br />

crop is an important source <strong>of</strong> protein for human and animal diet and has its own contribution<br />

as a builder and restorer <strong>of</strong> soil fertility. Redgram contains about 22 percent protein, which is<br />

almost three times that <strong>of</strong> cereals. Redgram supplies a major share <strong>of</strong> protein requirement <strong>of</strong><br />

vegetarian population <strong>of</strong> the country. It is particularly rich in lysine, rib<strong>of</strong>lavin, thiamine, niacin<br />

and iron. In Ethiopia, not only the pods, but also the young shoots and leaves are cooked and<br />

eaten. According to the latest Agriculture Census, the total number <strong>of</strong> operational holdings in<br />

India numbered 138.35 million with an average land size <strong>of</strong> 1.15 hectares <strong>of</strong> the total holdings,<br />

85 per cent are in marginal and small farm categories <strong>of</strong> less than 2 hectares. These small farms,<br />

though operating only on 44 per cent <strong>of</strong> land under cultivation, are the main providers <strong>of</strong> food<br />

and nutritional security to the nation but have limited access to resources as well as<br />

technologies. To ensure livelihood security <strong>of</strong> marginal and small farmers, it is necessary to<br />

focus on their technological needs at lower costs.<br />

Methodology<br />

Crop species is considered as an important parameter. Pigeon pea crop is very well fitting in to<br />

various agro-ecological sub-regions for inter cropping with cereals as well as sole crop. This<br />

crop grains serve for protein supplement for vegetarian human population diet and fodder for<br />

the animals. PRG158 variety red gram, which is widely grown. Another important parameter<br />

that influences the weeding operation is row to row spacing <strong>of</strong> the crop which requires some<br />

Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment<br />

718 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

contemporary adjustments in the over all implement length, effective working width, type <strong>of</strong><br />

cutting element, accordingly blade spacing and number <strong>of</strong> blades to be fitted on the rotor shaft.<br />

Weeding machine performance is influenced by the crop height. In general, weed removal<br />

process alone or in combination with intercultural operation being taken up at different time<br />

intervals; but two such operations are compulsorily carried by farmers. In normal conditions<br />

30 to 60 days after sowing (DAS) is recommended practice in pigeon pea. Branching pattern<br />

in pigeon pea depends on genotype and spacing between rows and plant to plant. At wider<br />

spacing's, it may form a bush and at narrow spacing remains compact and upright with lower<br />

quantity <strong>of</strong> foliage. As the crop DAS is more, the branches will spread side words occupying<br />

more inter row spacing. Horizontal spread <strong>of</strong> branches makes it difficult to move any<br />

implement and slow down the operational speed <strong>of</strong> the machine. The horizontal spreading <strong>of</strong><br />

the canopy <strong>of</strong> the red gram crop was measured at the maximum cone diameter. Overall, the<br />

type <strong>of</strong> crop species and its planting geometry influences the performance and as well as field<br />

capacity <strong>of</strong> weeding machine. The machinery system was conceptualized and fabricated based<br />

on mean values <strong>of</strong> various crop parameters measured to test for mechanical weeding operation.<br />

Selection <strong>of</strong> power source is also a very important while developing any type <strong>of</strong> agricultural<br />

machine. The power required for rotary weeder was selected from a mini tractor having engine<br />

power <strong>of</strong> 13.4 kW (18.5 hp).<br />

Results<br />

Weeding Operation in redgram field with L-Type Blades<br />

Rotary weeder prototype was evaluated in terms <strong>of</strong> weeding efficiency, plant damage, effective<br />

field capacity and fuel consumption. Weeding efficiency <strong>of</strong> L-type blades with rotary speeds<br />

<strong>of</strong> 300 and 440 rpm with forward speed 1.7 km/h was varied in the range <strong>of</strong> 82.56% to 91.69%.<br />

Weeding efficiency <strong>of</strong> L-type blades with rotary speeds <strong>of</strong> 300 and 440 rpm with forward speed<br />

<strong>of</strong> 2.5 km/h in the range <strong>of</strong> 76.87% to 80.24%. Plant damage <strong>of</strong> L-type blades with rotary speed<br />

719 | Page Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

<strong>of</strong> 300 and 440 rpm with forward speed 1.7 km/h at 25 and 45 days after sowing was in the<br />

range <strong>of</strong> 2.12% to 3.96%. For L-type blades the plant damage varied from 2.19% to 4.16% at<br />

the selected variables. The effective field capacity <strong>of</strong> L-type blades with rotary speeds <strong>of</strong> 300<br />

and 440 rpm at forward speed 1.7 km/h at 25 and 45 DAS was varied in the range <strong>of</strong> 0.13 ha/h<br />

to 0.14 ha/h. Effective field capacity for L-type blades with rotary speeds <strong>of</strong> 300 and 440 rpm<br />

with forward speed 2.5 km/h at 25 and 45 DAS was varied in the range <strong>of</strong> 0.19 ha/h and 0.21<br />

ha/h. The fuel consumption <strong>of</strong> modified mini tractor having L-type blades with rotary speeds<br />

<strong>of</strong> 300 and 440 rpm with forward speed 1.7 km/h at 25 and 45 DAS was varied in the range <strong>of</strong><br />

0.95 - 1.12 l/h. Fuel consumption for L-type blades with rotary speeds <strong>of</strong> 300 and 440 rpm with<br />

forward speed 2.5 km/h at 25 and 45 DAS varied from 1.25-1.38 l/h, respectively. Ten number<br />

<strong>of</strong> observations for each parameter were measured in the earmarked field plot and the range<br />

was recorded. Weeding implements work in shallower depth up to 10cm (Goel et. al., 2008)<br />

when compared with tillage implement, the soil moisture and bulk density values were<br />

measured in the depth range 0 - 10cm and cone penetration resistance values from 0-17.5cm.<br />

The soil moisture and bulk density in the selected plots ranged from 9.6 to 12.49%db and 1.25<br />

to 1.4 g/cc, respectively. The cone penetration resistance values varied from 100-2489 MPa<br />

and as the depth increased from surface, penetration resistance was also increased.<br />

Conclusion<br />

In redgram crop production weed is one <strong>of</strong> the major problems. But, the simplest and most<br />

popular management method is manual weed control, where, labours pull weeds out <strong>of</strong> the soil<br />

using different types <strong>of</strong> hand tools like khurpi, wheel hoe, hand hoe, etc. simultaneously<br />

fulfilling intercultural operation also. These practices are expensive, time consuming and<br />

difficult to organize labourer for weeding. Mechanical weed control is very effective as it helps<br />

to reduce the drudgery involved in manual weeding, kills the weeds and keeps the soil surface<br />

loose ensuring soil aeration and moisture absorption capacity.<br />

References<br />

Power J. R., Harris J. R, Etherton, K. A. Snyder M. Ronaghi and Newburgh, B. H. 2000.<br />

Performance <strong>of</strong> an automatically deployable ROPS on ASAE tests. J. Agric. Saf.<br />

Health, 7:51-61.<br />

Rajashekar M and Dr. Mohan Kumar S., 2015. Virtual Design, aanalysis and ddevelopment <strong>of</strong><br />

single row weeder. Int. J. Emerg. Tech., 6(1): 125-129.<br />

Tajuddin A. 2006. Design, development and testing <strong>of</strong> engine operated weeder. Agric. Eng.<br />

Today, 30(5, 6): 25–29.<br />

Tewari V.K, Datta R.K. and Murthy A.S.R. 1993. Field performance <strong>of</strong> weeding blades <strong>of</strong> a<br />

manually operated push-pull weeder. J. Agric. Eng. Resh., 55: 129-141.<br />

Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment<br />

720 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Thorat Deepak S, Sahoo P. K, Dipankar De and Mir Asif Iquebal. 2014. Design and<br />

Development <strong>of</strong> Ridge Pr<strong>of</strong>ile Power Weeder. J. Agric. Eng., 51 (4)<br />

Veerangouda M, Anantachar M and Sushilendra. 2010. Performance evaluation <strong>of</strong> weeders in<br />

cotton. Karnataka J. Agric. Sci., 23(5): 732-736.<br />

T5-09R-1101<br />

Sorghum Yield Response to Future Climate in a Semi-Arid Environment<br />

M. A. Sarath Chandran* and A. V. M. Subba Rao<br />

ICAR-Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, Hyderabad – 500059, Telangana, India<br />

*ma.sarath@icar.gov.in<br />

Sorghum is a key dryland cereal crop that is highly adaptable to various extreme weather<br />

events, especially drought. The industrial demand for sorghum has been on the rise, considering<br />

the requirement in the food industry. Hence, the response <strong>of</strong> sorghum to projected climate is a<br />

topic <strong>of</strong> interest in semi-arid regions <strong>of</strong> the world. Climate, with its spatial and temporal<br />

variability, is a major influencing factor in crop production. Thus, any change in climatic<br />

elements is bound to have either positive or negative impacts on crop production. While the<br />

increase in temperature during crop growing season reduces the yield, the CO 2 fertilization<br />

effect to an extent can reduce its negative impact. Very little literature is available in the Indian<br />

context regarding the response <strong>of</strong> various sorghum cultivars to projected climate using crop<br />

modelling. This present study was undertaken with the objectives to calibrate the CERES-<br />

Sorghum-DSSAT model for the semi-arid region <strong>of</strong> India, validating the CERES-Sorghum-<br />

DSSAT model for sorghum and quantifying the impact <strong>of</strong> projected climate on growth and<br />

yield <strong>of</strong> sorghum in the semi-arid region <strong>of</strong> India.<br />

Methodology<br />

A field experiment was conducted in Gunegal Research Farm <strong>of</strong> ICAR-CRIDA during the<br />

Kharif seasons <strong>of</strong> 2016-2018 in a split-plot design with three dates <strong>of</strong> sowing as the main plot<br />

treatment and three sorghum cultivars (CSV-20, CSV-23 and CSV-27) as sub-plot treatments.<br />

The data during the first two years was used for calibration <strong>of</strong> the CERES-Sorghum model in<br />

DSSAT v4.7.0 and the third-year data was used for model validation. The future climate was<br />

derived from an ensemble <strong>of</strong> 29 general circulation models (GCMs). The simulation was<br />

conducted for three time periods viz., near-century (2010-39), mid-century (2040-69) and endcentury<br />

(2070-99) under emission pathways <strong>of</strong> RCP4.5 and RCP8.5. The mean changes in days<br />

to anthesis, total crop duration, and yield during the future time periods compared to that <strong>of</strong><br />

baseline (1980-2009) were estimated.<br />

721 | Page Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Results<br />

Changes in projected climate compared to baseline: The mean seasonal rainfall during the baseline<br />

period was 527 mm. The mean seasonal rainfall is projected to change by -8.7%, -7.6%, -8.3%, +1.7%,<br />

+0.8% and +1.1% during near-century-RCP4.5, near-century-RCP8.5, mid-century-RCP4.5, midcentury-RCP8.5,<br />

end-century-RCP4.5, end-century-RCP8.5, respectively. The mean baseline<br />

maximum temperature (Tmax) during the sorghum growing period was 32 °C. No change in Tmax is<br />

projected during the near century under both RCP4.5 and 8.5. It is projected to increase by 1 °C during<br />

mid-century (RCP4.5 and 8.5) and end-century-RCP4.5; 2 °C by end-century-RCP8.5. Similarly, Tmin<br />

is projected to increase by 1 °C during the near-century (both under RCP4.5 and 8.5), mid-century and<br />

end-century under RCP4.5. During the end-century-RCP8.5, the projected rise in Tmin is +3 °C.<br />

Projected changes in phenology: A delayed anthesis and maturity by 1-2 days is projected for all three<br />

sorghum cultivars (CSV-20, 23 and 27) during near-century-RCP4.5 and 8.5 as depicted in the figures<br />

below. During all other future scenarios, days to anthesis and total crop duration are projected to<br />

decrease. The highest decrease is projected during end-century-RCP8.5 (6-7 days for days to anthesis<br />

and 7-10 days for total crop duration). The major reason for this may be the projected increase in both<br />

Tmax and Tmin, which will cause a faster accumulation <strong>of</strong> growing degree days (Guo et al., 2019;<br />

Chandran et al., 2022).<br />

Projected changes in grain yield: The yield is projected to decrease during all future scenarios. For<br />

CSV-20, the projected yield reduction is -5%, -6%, -13%, -22%, -11% and -31% during near-century-<br />

RCP4.5, near-century-RCP8.5, mid-century-RCP4.5, mid-century-RCP8.5, end-century-RCP4.5, endcentury-RCP8.5,<br />

respectively (Fig. 1b). For CSV-23, the projected reduction is -1%, -2%, -8%, -8%, -<br />

4% and -15%, respectively during the above-mentioned future climates. For CSV-27, the yield is<br />

projected to decrease by -4%, -4%, -10%, -12%, -5% and -18%. It was observed that among the three<br />

cultivars, the yield <strong>of</strong> CSV-20 will be reduced to a greater extent than the other two. Among the two<br />

emission scenarios, a greater yield reduction was simulated under RCP8.5, compared to RCP4.5 during<br />

all the future climates<br />

Projected changes in (a) phenology and (b) yield <strong>of</strong> three sorghum cultivars during future climates under<br />

a semi-arid environment<br />

Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment<br />

722 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Conclusion<br />

CERES-Sorghum model <strong>of</strong> DSSAT was calibrated and validated for a semi-arid location in<br />

India for climate change impact assessment in sorghum. Rising temperatures (both Tmax and<br />

Tmin) caused a shortening <strong>of</strong> crop duration (in future climates). Shortening <strong>of</strong> crop duration<br />

led to a reduction in yield as it affected both vegetative growth and reproductive phases. This<br />

may be the reason for the decrease in yield consistently during future climates, except during<br />

the near century, where a marked increase in both Tmax and Tmin was not projected. The<br />

results <strong>of</strong> the study highlight the necessity to develop adaptation strategies for overcoming the<br />

negative impact <strong>of</strong> projected climate on sorghum cultivation.<br />

References<br />

Guo Y, Wu W, Du, M., Liu, X., Wang, J., Bryant, C.R. 2019 Modelling climate change impacts<br />

on rice growth and yield under global warming <strong>of</strong> 1.5 and 2.0 °C in the Pearl River<br />

Delta, China. Atmosphere. 10:567.<br />

Chandran M. A. S, Banerjee S, Mukherjee A, Nanda M.K. and Kumari V.V. 2022. Evaluating<br />

the long-term impact <strong>of</strong> projected climate on rice-lentil-groundnut cropping system in<br />

lower gangetic plain <strong>of</strong> India using crop simulation modelling. Int J Biomet. 66: 55-69.<br />

T5-10P-1003<br />

Stress Management in Wheat Crop through Foliar Spray <strong>of</strong> TGA Agrochemical<br />

R. S. Rathore 1 , Dayanand 1 , P. P. Rohilla 2* , S. K.Singh 2 and V. Nagar 2<br />

1 Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Abusar-Jhunjhunu (Raj.),<br />

2 Swami Keshwanand Rajasthan Agricultural University, Bikaner (Raj.)-333001 (India).<br />

*drpprohilla@gmail.com<br />

Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) is the second most important cereal crop after rice in providing food<br />

and nutritional security to the masses in India. It is the most widely cultivated cereal crop which is<br />

the largest contributor with nearly 30% <strong>of</strong> the world grain production and 50% <strong>of</strong> the world grain<br />

trade. FAO estimated that the world would require additional 198 million tonnes <strong>of</strong> wheat by 2050<br />

to accomplish the future demands, for which wheat production need to be increased by 77% in the<br />

developing countries. Regarding the global climate change in the past few decades, the impact <strong>of</strong><br />

rising temperature on wheat production is gaining concern worldwide. Heat and drought are the<br />

major abiotic stress limiting the wheat production, which are common in semi-arid and arid region.<br />

Keeping the above problem in view total 80 demonstrations on wheat crop were conducted at<br />

farmer’s field in NICRA village Bharu, Jhunjhunu (Rajasthan) during rabi season 2017-18 to 2020-<br />

21 for four consecutive years to assess the effect <strong>of</strong> TGA (Thio Glycolic Acid) agrochemical foliar<br />

spray on stress management in wheat crop. TGA is the organic compound, <strong>of</strong>ten called Mercapto<br />

723 | Page Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

acetic acid (MAA). It contains both thio and carboxylic acid functional groups. It is used in salt forms<br />

including calcium thioglycolate and sodium thioglycolate. Farming situation is irrigated and soil is<br />

sandy loam in Jhunjhunu district. The sowing <strong>of</strong> wheat crop was done from second week to last week<br />

<strong>of</strong> November under irrigated condition. Two foliar spray <strong>of</strong> TGA agrochemical (100 ppm) on 15<br />

days interval for two times at first and second fortnight in February month was done by knapsack<br />

/power sprayer. Crop was harvested during first/ second week <strong>of</strong> April. The data analyzed revealed<br />

that the average gross return and net return was `107636 and `96495; `59111 and `49043 <strong>of</strong> foliar<br />

spray demonstration and local check, respectively. It could be concluded that average production<br />

(12.11 %) and net pr<strong>of</strong>it <strong>of</strong> wheat crop (20.52%) were increased by foliar spray <strong>of</strong> TGA under field<br />

conditions. The total cost <strong>of</strong> TGA agro-chemical material along with two foliar spray cost was about<br />

`500/ha. Hence, two foliar spray <strong>of</strong> TGA agro-chemical at tillering and milking stage in wheat crop<br />

could be added in package <strong>of</strong> practices and motivate the farmers for adoption <strong>of</strong> new techniques for<br />

stress management in wheat crop and getting economic returns.<br />

T5-11P-1024<br />

Effect <strong>of</strong> Foliar Application <strong>of</strong> Different Nan<strong>of</strong>ertilizers on Performance <strong>of</strong><br />

Rainfed Maize in Southern Telangana<br />

K. A. Gopinath 1 , V. Visha Kumari 1 , K. Sammi Reddy 1 , V. K. Singh 1 ,<br />

G. Ravindra Chary 1 , A. K. Shanker 1 , S. Kundu 1 , M.R. Krupashankar 2 ,<br />

Tarunendu Singh 2 and B. Rajkumar 1<br />

1 ICAR-Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, Hyderabad, Telangana 500 059, India;<br />

2 Indian Farmers Fertilizer Cooperative Limited, IFFCO Sadan, New Delhi 110 017, India<br />

Limited nutrient use efficiency and environmental constraints associated with the use <strong>of</strong><br />

chemical fertilizers remain a hindrance for achieving reasonable sustainability in agriculture.<br />

Additionally, cost increases resulting from over-application <strong>of</strong> chemical fertilizers reduce<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>it margins for growers. Several strategies have been proposed to increase fertilizer use<br />

efficiency, such as the use <strong>of</strong> precision fertilization, split or localized application, fertigation,<br />

and the use <strong>of</strong> nan<strong>of</strong>ertilizers. Studies have revealed that some nan<strong>of</strong>ertilizers have the potential<br />

to increase crop productivity by enhancing seed germination, seedling growth, photosynthesis,<br />

nitrogen metabolism, and protein and carbohydrate synthesis, aside from improving stress<br />

tolerance. However, there is scarcity <strong>of</strong> information especially on effect <strong>of</strong> nan<strong>of</strong>ertilizers on<br />

growth and yield <strong>of</strong> rainfed crops, nutrient use efficiency and on soil properties.<br />

Methodology<br />

A field experiment was conducted during kharif, 2021 at Gunegal Research Farm (GRF) <strong>of</strong><br />

ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad to study the effect <strong>of</strong> nano-N, nano-Zn and Nano-Cu alone and in<br />

combinations with different doses <strong>of</strong> recommended NPK on rainfed maize (cv. DHM 111).<br />

Soil <strong>of</strong> the experimental site was sandy loam; slightly acidic in reaction (pH 6.51), EC was in<br />

Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment<br />

724 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

normal range (0.05-0.07 dS/m), low in organic carbon (0.43%), available N (229.1 kg/ha), high<br />

in available P (24.7 kg/ha) and medium in available K (218.1 kg/ha). The experiment was<br />

arranged in a randomized block design with three replications. The experimental plots were<br />

tilled to a depth <strong>of</strong> 15-20cm using tractor-drawn cultivator twice before sowing <strong>of</strong> the crop.<br />

Sowing was done with tractor-drawn seed drill at a spacing <strong>of</strong> 90 cm × 20 cm. Thinning and<br />

gap filling was done 10-15 days after sowing, as required. The recommended dose <strong>of</strong> NPKZn<br />

was 90:45:45:25 kg N, P2O5, K2O and ZnSO4/ha. Nan<strong>of</strong>ertilizers were sprayed @ 2ml/liter<br />

water at 25 and 45 days after sowing as per the treatment, using a battery-operated power<br />

sprayer.<br />

Results<br />

Application <strong>of</strong> recommended dose <strong>of</strong> fertilizers (NPKZn) with foliar spray <strong>of</strong> nano-N + nano-<br />

Zn twice at 25 and 45 days after sowing being on par with N100PK + nano-N + nano-Zn + nano-<br />

Cu, recommended NPK, N 100PKZn + nano-N, N 75PKZn + nano-N, N 100PK + nano-Zn, N 75PK<br />

+ nano-N + nano-Zn and N 100PK + nano-Cu recorded significantly higher SPAD value (42.7)<br />

compared to other treatments. Foliar application <strong>of</strong> nano-N, nano-Zn and nano-Cu with<br />

application <strong>of</strong> either 75% or 100% recommended N recorded similar but significantly higher<br />

leaf area index (LAI) compared to foliar spray <strong>of</strong> nan<strong>of</strong>ertilizers with control (no N) and 50%<br />

recommended N. Application <strong>of</strong> recommended NPK with foliar spray <strong>of</strong> nano-N + nano-Zn +<br />

nano-Cu or nano-N + nano-Zn recorded significantly higher 100-grain weight (28.4-28.6 g)<br />

compared to other treatments. Similarly, application <strong>of</strong> recommended NPK + foliar spray <strong>of</strong><br />

nano-urea + nano-Zn + nano-Cu being on par with recommended NPK + foliar spray <strong>of</strong> nanourea<br />

+ nano-Zn recorded significantly higher grain yield (3308 kg/ha) compared to other<br />

treatments. Kumar et al. (2022) also reported increase yield <strong>of</strong> wheat, sesame, pearl millet and<br />

mustard with application <strong>of</strong> nano-N and nano-Zn. Application <strong>of</strong> recommended NPK + foliar<br />

spray <strong>of</strong> nano-N + nano-Zn also recorded significantly higher stalk yield (6179 kg/ha)<br />

compared to other treatments except recommended dose <strong>of</strong> fertilizers alone, recommended<br />

NPK + nano-Zn, foliar spray <strong>of</strong> nano-N + nano-Zn with application <strong>of</strong> either 50% or 75%<br />

recommended N, recommended NPK + nano-Cu, and N100PK + nano-N + nano-Zn + nano-Cu<br />

treatments. Application <strong>of</strong> recommended NPK + foliar spray <strong>of</strong> nano-N, nano-Zn and nano-Cu<br />

twice at 25 and 45 days after sowing recorded significantly higher harvest index (0.36)<br />

compared to other treatments except N75PKZn + nano-N, N100PKZn + nano-N, N100PK + nano-<br />

Zn, N 75PK + nano-N + nano-Zn, and N 100PK + nano-N + nano-Zn + nano-Cu.<br />

725 | Page Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Effect <strong>of</strong> treatments on growth and yield <strong>of</strong> maize<br />

Treatment SPAD LAI<br />

100-seed<br />

weight (g)<br />

Grain yield<br />

(kg/ha)<br />

N 0PKZn 0 19.8 2.96 25.2 835<br />

NPKZn 0 40.2 5.08 26.3 2589<br />

N 0PKZn 21.7 3.33 25.3 909<br />

N 50PKZn 31.9 3.91 26.2 1693<br />

N 75PKZn 36.3 4.80 26.8 2241<br />

N 100PKZn 40.7 5.20 26.8 2694<br />

N 0PKZn + Nano-N 22.2 3.43 25.4 1227<br />

N 50PKZn + Nano-N 34.8 4.12 26.8 2218<br />

N 75PKZn + Nano-N 40.0 5.10 27.0 2801<br />

N 100PKZn + Nano-N 42.0 5.25 28.2 3009<br />

N 0PK + Nano-Zn 24.7 3.30 25.4 1036<br />

N 50PK + Nano-Zn 32.6 3.92 26.2 1758<br />

N 75PK + Nano-Zn 36.7 4.84 27.0 2385<br />

N 100PK + Nano-Zn 40.9 5.12 27.2 2896<br />

N 0PK + Nano-N + Nano-Zn 28.3 3.50 25.9 1359<br />

N 50PK + Nano-N + Nano-Zn 35.3 4.16 26.9 2350<br />

N 75PK + Nano-N + Nano-Zn 40.6 5.13 27.2 2920<br />

N 100PK + Nano-N + Nano-Zn 42.7 5.18 28.4 3299<br />

N 100PK + Nano-Cu 40.1 5.00 26.8 2603<br />

N 100PK + Nano-N + Nano-Zn + Nano-Cu 41.8 5.31 28.6 3308<br />

LSD (p=0.05) 3.6 0.52 0.7 253<br />

Conclusion<br />

Application <strong>of</strong> recommended NPK + foliar spray <strong>of</strong> nano-urea + nano-Zn + nano-Cu being on<br />

par with recommended NPK + foliar spray <strong>of</strong> nano-urea + nano-Zn recorded significantly<br />

higher grain yield (3308 kg/ha) compared to other treatments.<br />

References<br />

Kumar A, Singh K, Verma P, Singh O, Panwar A, Singh T, Kumar Y and Raliya R. 2022.<br />

Effect <strong>of</strong> nitrogen and zinc nan<strong>of</strong>ertilizer with the organic farming practices on cereal<br />

and oilseed crops. Sci. Rep., 12:6938.<br />

Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment<br />

726 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

T5-12P-1051<br />

Evaluation <strong>of</strong> Horse Gram Grain for Bio-Accessibility <strong>of</strong> Iron and Zinc by<br />

in-vitro Method<br />

K. Sreedevi Shankar 1* , Basudeb Sarkar 1 , Asma Siddiqua 1 , M. Shankar 2 and<br />

V. K. Singh 1<br />

1 ICAR-Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, Hyderabad-500059, Telangana, India;<br />

2 Pr<strong>of</strong>essor Jayashankar Telangana State Agricultural University, Hyderabad-500030, India.<br />

* k.sreedevishankar@icar.gov.in<br />

Horse gram (Macrotyloma uniflorum) is one <strong>of</strong> the lesser known legumes <strong>of</strong><br />

the tropics and subtropics, grown mostly under dryland conditions. Horse gram is an excellent<br />

source <strong>of</strong> iron and zinc, and is commonly consumed in India by farming community and lowincome<br />

groups. Four genotypes <strong>of</strong> horse gram were evaluated for their iron and zinc contents<br />

and their bio-accessibility measured through invitro dialyzability. The horse gram seeds have<br />

relatively higher trypsin inhibitor, hemagglutinin activities and natural phenols than most bean<br />

seeds. The most reliable method for determining bio-availability <strong>of</strong> iron from diets is to<br />

measure iron absorption. An invitro method, on the other hand has several advantages for rapid<br />

screening and testing <strong>of</strong> bio-availability <strong>of</strong> iron from diets consumed and suggest<br />

improvements in the diets so as to increase availability <strong>of</strong> iron from the legume.<br />

Methodology<br />

The grain samples from four genotypes <strong>of</strong> horse gram (16 K CRIDA – 18R, 16 K CRIDA –<br />

22, 16 K CRIDA – 19 and 16 K CRIDA – 4) were taken up for the study. Bio-accessibility <strong>of</strong><br />

iron and zinc from horse gram samples were determined by an invitro method described by<br />

Narasinga Rao and Prabhavathi (1978). The grain samples were extracted with pepsin-HCl at<br />

pH 1.35 and subsequently the pH was adjusted to pH 7.5 and iron and zinc were estimated by<br />

the AAS method. Calcium content and the metallic cations were determined through the diacid<br />

method using AAS. The phytic acid from horse gram samples were determined. The crude<br />

fiber was estimated by using ANKOM fibre bag system. The Physico-chemical and<br />

hydration/cooking characteristics <strong>of</strong> horse gram i.e., hydration capacity, hydration index,<br />

swelling capacity, swelling index, cooking time (min) and 100-seed weight were also<br />

estimated. All the samples were analysed in triplicate.<br />

Results<br />

The percent bio-accessibility <strong>of</strong> iron at pH 7.5 (7.23%) was found higher with 16 K CRIDA –<br />

18R. The bio-accessibility <strong>of</strong> zinc was significantly higher (32.21%) in genotype 16 K CRHG<br />

– 22. Significantly high content (213.00 mg/100 g) <strong>of</strong> phytic acid was observed in 16 K CRHG<br />

– 4. The calcium content was significantly higher (120.16 mg/100 g) in 16 K CRHG – 19. The<br />

727 | Page Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

crude fiber content <strong>of</strong> 4.8g was recorded with 16 K CRHG – 4. Regarding cooking studies, the<br />

higher (0.041 g water per seed) hydration capacity was recorded with 16 K CRHG – 19,<br />

hydration index (1.106 g) was recorded 16 K CRIDA – 18. Swelling capacity (0.078 ml per<br />

seed) was higher in 16 K CRHG – 19, swelling index (1.066 ml) noted with 16 K CRHG – 19.<br />

The cooking time was recorded significantly lower (6.02 min) in 16 K CRHG - 19.<br />

Conclusion<br />

The most reliable method for determining bioavailability <strong>of</strong> iron from diets is to measure iron<br />

absorption. The available iron as measured by this invitro procedure was shown to decrease<br />

considerably when inhibitors like phytic acid or tannin were included. Studies in humans have<br />

shown that phytates and tannins decrease considerably the absorption <strong>of</strong> non heme iron,<br />

especially in foods <strong>of</strong> plant origin. Thus, ionizable iron at pH 7.5 can be used as a valid measure<br />

<strong>of</strong> bio-availability <strong>of</strong> iron from horse gram grain.<br />

Assessment <strong>of</strong> Soil Erodibility Indices for Beed Station<br />

M. More Ram* and A. Ananya Mishra<br />

College <strong>of</strong> Agricultural Engineering & Technology, VNMKV, Parbhani-431602, M.S.<br />

*ramlvs4ru@gmail.com<br />

T5-13P-1065<br />

Soil erodibility, which is a major factor in erosion prediction and land use planning. The<br />

Wischmeier and Smith (1963) formula was used to determine the erodibility indices <strong>of</strong> soil<br />

samples. Soil erodibility is the degree <strong>of</strong> resistance to the impact <strong>of</strong> raindrops on the soil surface<br />

and the shearing action <strong>of</strong> run<strong>of</strong>f water. Soil erodibility factor can be used to predict the Soil losses<br />

from different locations. Erodibility is susceptibility and vulnerability <strong>of</strong> soil get eroded and it plays<br />

important role to soil erosion. The data required for the erodibility estimation i.e. soil properties<br />

are not easily available at Beed station. The soil properties such as soil texture class index, soil<br />

permeability, organic matter content and % sand + % <strong>of</strong> very fine sand + % <strong>of</strong> silt (100 - clay %).<br />

These parameters were investigated and used to determine the erodibility index k at various<br />

locations. In present study, selected five location are A, B, C, D and E. The soil erodibility factor<br />

K for A, B, C, D and E are 0.046, 0.057, 0.056, 0.023, 0.046, respectively. The average annual soil<br />

loss in t ha -1 yr -1 was also estimated for each location to confirm the area that is more prone to<br />

erosion. The soil losses from this respective location are 37.81, 46.85, 46.03, 18.90, 37.81 t ha -1 yr -<br />

1 . The soils were analyzed to have greater proportions <strong>of</strong> sand to silt and clay thus, found to be<br />

erodible, comparing the erodibility indices obtained with the standard erodibility indices provided<br />

by Olson (1984). Provision <strong>of</strong> adequate soil conservation structures, drainage facilities, wind<br />

breakers or shelter belts is recommended to protect the first 60cm depth within these areas from<br />

wind and water erosion especially, as the soils have proved to be erodible. These soil erodibility<br />

indices will be helpful for erosion prediction model at Beed district station.<br />

Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment<br />

728 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

T5-14P-1084<br />

Floor Management Machinery for Weed Control in Horticulture Crops<br />

Sanjeeva Reddy, B; Ashish S. Dhimate, I. Srinivas; R.V. Adake and R.V. Mallikarjuna<br />

ICAR-Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture Hyderabad, Telangana–500059, India<br />

Horticultural sector made strides at national level with record production <strong>of</strong> 300.6 m tons<br />

from 24.85m ha area in 2016 -17, which is an increase <strong>of</strong> 9.5% and outpaced the food grain<br />

production, since 2012-2013. In recent years, farmers are shifting from traditional<br />

subsistence farming to commercial horticulture with technical inputs <strong>of</strong> research and constant<br />

government support programs (Meghwal et al,.2018). As in case <strong>of</strong> field crops, weeds cause<br />

upto 50% loss in fruit yield. Mechanical manipulation under dryland conditions, is<br />

problematic due to increased risk <strong>of</strong> moisture loss and soil erosion. So, the cultivation<br />

practices should be strategically adopted as part <strong>of</strong> an integrated weed management approach<br />

to achieve optimum response. Management <strong>of</strong> weeds with suitable and synergistic machines<br />

with possible lowest soil manipulation protects the top soil <strong>of</strong> horticulture crops thus helps<br />

to improve the fertility for better growth and improved productivity. The other method <strong>of</strong><br />

supressing weed growth is growing cover crops which also need farm equipment for better<br />

management and to protects top soil and supplement organic matter to the soil. Therefore,<br />

keeping these points in view, ICAR-Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture,<br />

Hyderabad developed weed control floor management machines suitable for horticulture<br />

crops.<br />

Methodology<br />

There is a growing demand for controlling weeds without use <strong>of</strong> herbicides. The machinery<br />

like mowers and slashers have the advantage <strong>of</strong> enabling weeds and unwanted vegetation<br />

control in all weather conditions. In this category three types <strong>of</strong> machines namely (i). Tractor<br />

back mounted PTO operated mower (ii). Side mounted rotary disc with hydraulic power unit<br />

(iii). Cover crop shredding machine and its related components were developed.<br />

Development details <strong>of</strong> Machines: (i) Tractor back mounted PTO operated mower consists<br />

<strong>of</strong> three main parts: a rectangular frame <strong>of</strong> 1.6X1.6 m in size made <strong>of</strong> 90x12mm flat to which<br />

5mm thick mild steel metal sheet was welded throughout the frame; a speed reduction<br />

gearbox with right angle drive fitted at the middle <strong>of</strong> the rectangular frame with bolts and<br />

nuts. The horizontal shaft leading into the gearbox can be attached to the tractor PTO. The<br />

vertical shaft from the gearbox will drive the mowing blades (2 no- 700x10mm size)<br />

sharpened on the leading side; and a standard three-point hitch system is provided to the<br />

frame by welding straight flats and angle iron flats at required positions. (ii) Side mounted<br />

rotary disc with hydraulic power unit basically consists <strong>of</strong> two components, the first one is a<br />

Hydraulic power pack which is fitted over a carriage frame attached to the tractor three-point<br />

729 | Page Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

hitch system and the pack gets power from tractor Power take <strong>of</strong>f shaft. The second<br />

component is multi-functional tool bar holder fitted to tractor chassis just in front <strong>of</strong> rear<br />

tyres. The power pack carriage frame was rectangular in shape (180cm x 67cm size) made<br />

with a mild steel square bar <strong>of</strong> 50x50x5mm. The frame was provided two support pneumatic<br />

wheels <strong>of</strong> 5x12 ply rating for easy field mobility without much vibration’s due to activation<br />

<strong>of</strong> various hydraulic components. (iii) Cover crop shredding machine consisted <strong>of</strong> a<br />

rectangular shaped tubular frame (2015mm x 490 mm) coved all three sides except front,<br />

power transmission system with gearbox, chain and sprocket arrangement and a rotor unit<br />

with hinged blades. The rotor shaft is 1850mm in length made <strong>of</strong> hallow pipe <strong>of</strong> 190 mm<br />

outer diameter with 10 mm thick wall and with splined shafts <strong>of</strong> 150mm length at both the<br />

ends. The hinged blades with bolting fixers on the rotor were arranged by providing 60mm<br />

length brackets (30x5mm size) at an angular space <strong>of</strong> 1200 welded at regular intervals on<br />

shaft. Inverted Y shaped and 200mm effective length metal blades were arranged having<br />

inner cutting edge bevelled to reduce the cutting force. A standard three-point hitch<br />

arrangement was fabricated with mild steel flats and fitted to the shredder main frame<br />

assembly.<br />

Results<br />

Frequent use <strong>of</strong> cultivator to control weeds does not conserve soil organic matter, so need to<br />

promote soil friendly machines, which will minimally disturb the soil. The developed weed<br />

control floor management machines were tested under different conditions to verify its<br />

intended purposes. The tractor back mounted PTO operated mower is able to reach the<br />

tightest spaces with ease in horticulture crops. The machine lateral heavy-duty blades allow<br />

it to both mowe weed biomass and mulch the smaller pruning’s. This machine is found more<br />

suitable for herbs and juicy stemmed grass types weeds. This type <strong>of</strong> machine was developed<br />

in two sizes, one to meet the small and the other to large scale horticulture farmers, those<br />

who are using15 - 22 hp and 35 -45 hp tractors, respectively.<br />

The side mounted rotary disc with hydraulic power pack unit is a two in one modal machine.<br />

Depending on the weed control requirement, either weed biomass mowing rotary disc or<br />

weed control soil mechanical manipulation disc could be fitted interchangeably. The weed<br />

biomass mowing rotary disc working width was 80 cm with 3 knives and 3 special nylon<br />

strings. The machine rotary disc fitted bar was provided with side shift and disc lift<br />

arrangements. A rear independent hydraulic system with proper components and linkages<br />

powers the working head and a 50 plus hp tractor is required to operate this machine.<br />

Several suitable green manure and cover crops were recommended to maintain soil fertility<br />

and as a weed control check in cultivation <strong>of</strong> horticulture crops depending on its properties<br />

and option for use. However, some <strong>of</strong> these legume and non-legume cover crops should be<br />

treated before seed formation for weed control considerations point <strong>of</strong> view and few more<br />

Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment<br />

730 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

for biomass quick biological decomposition, in which the farm equipment come into play a<br />

major role. The ICAR-CRIDA developed crop stalk shredder machine, which shreds both<br />

wine type cover crop such as velvet bean and tall legumes like dhaincha, sun hemp as well.<br />

The machine was tested intensively on several crops for in-situ biomass shredding and as<br />

well as on green manure crops. The machine was able to shred biomass completely <strong>of</strong><br />

dhaincha and sun hemp, leaving a 10 – 15 cm height stubbles over the soil surface. The<br />

machine was also found effective on some field crop stalks like castor, maize and cotton as<br />

well, which are grown as inter crop in the early years <strong>of</strong> horticulture crops. The nature <strong>of</strong><br />

blades provided in the machine severed the stems <strong>of</strong> cut biomass such a way, which avoided<br />

tillering <strong>of</strong> stubbles completely.<br />

Conclusion<br />

The developed machines from this study show that, the machine design parameters play a<br />

significant role on weed or cover crop biomass cutting efficiency. It is concluded that, the<br />

selection <strong>of</strong> machine depends on intended purpose such as soil to be manipulated or biomass<br />

or cover crop to be managed for weed suppression.<br />

References<br />

Vyavasaya Panchangam, S. K. L. 2016. Telangana State Horticulture University. Department<br />

<strong>of</strong> Horticulture, Government <strong>of</strong> Telangana.<br />

Meghwal P. R., Akath Singh, Pradeep Kumar P. S., Khapte and Anurag Saxena. 2018.<br />

Upliftment <strong>of</strong> arid zone economy: Through horticultural and protected cultivation.<br />

Indian Farm., 68(09): 46–51.<br />

T5-15P-1087<br />

Impact <strong>of</strong> eCO2 and eTemp. on Aphis craccivora Koch. on Groundnut and<br />

Projection <strong>of</strong> Future Pest Status<br />

M. Srinivasa Rao*, D. L. A. Gayatri, T. V. Prasad, M. Vanaja, M. Navya and<br />

V. K. Singh<br />

ICAR-Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, Hyderabad, Telangana-500059, India<br />

*msrao909@gmail.com<br />

The global average temperature has risen by around 1°C since pre-industrial times. Even if all<br />

the commitments (called the “Nationally Determined Contributions”) made met, it is projected<br />

that global warming will exceed 3°C by the end <strong>of</strong> the century. The average temperature in<br />

India is projected to rise by approximately 4.4°Cover the recent past (1976–2005 average). An<br />

increase in temperature and elevated CO 2 (eCO 2) influence crop growth significantly and in<br />

turn affect the insect herbivores both directly and indirectly. Though it is known that the<br />

731 | Page Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

increase in temperature will have a greater effect on insects than the rising CO2 condition, the<br />

interactive and combinational effect <strong>of</strong> both parameters is more significant in influencing insect<br />

pests. Aphids, Aphis craccivora Koch. is one <strong>of</strong> the threats to groundnut (Arachis hypogaea<br />

L.) growers in all over the country. Understanding the population dynamics <strong>of</strong> insect pests is<br />

possible through the construction <strong>of</strong> life tables which are dynamic and function <strong>of</strong> various<br />

factors that differ with temperature and no studies are available on the construction <strong>of</strong> life table<br />

considering temperature and CO2 concurrently. Hence, the studies were conducted with the<br />

objectives i. to measure the effects <strong>of</strong> temperatures and eCO 2 on life table parameters <strong>of</strong> A.<br />

craccivora on groundnut ii. to predict the aphid pest scenarios during near and distant future<br />

climate change periods at six locations <strong>of</strong> India.<br />

Methodology<br />

Groundnut (Kadiri-6) seeds were sown in open-top chambers (OTC) at an elevated atmospheric<br />

CO 2 concentration <strong>of</strong> 550 ± 25 ppm CO 2 and ambient CO 2, aCO 2 (400 ± 25 ppm CO 2) and<br />

crop plants were raised during the entire crop season. Feeding trials were carried out (Srinivasa<br />

Rao et al., 2013) at constant temperatures (20, 25, 27, 30, 33 & 35 ± 0.5°C) and CO2 levels<br />

(550 ± 25 ppm and 380 ± 25 ppm) to study the growth and development <strong>of</strong> A. craccivora using<br />

CO2 growth chambers and adopting ‘cut leaf’ method. The life table parameters <strong>of</strong> A.<br />

craccivora were estimated by adopting the TWO SEX–MS Chart s<strong>of</strong>tware (Chi et al., 2005)<br />

by using primary parameters data <strong>of</strong> aphids on groundnut foliage from eCO 2 and aCO 2<br />

independently. Non-linear equations were arrived at after plotting this data against tested<br />

temperatures. The future climate data (maximum and minimum temperature- Tmax and Tmin)<br />

projections <strong>of</strong> the AIB PRECIS emission scenario were considered to estimate future life table<br />

parameters. The future period was designated as near and distant future periods (NF and DF)<br />

with 2021-2050 and 2071-2098 years respectively. The pest status during these periods was<br />

compared over the baseline (BL) period <strong>of</strong> 1961-1990 using future daily temperature<br />

(maximum and minimum) for 6 groundnut cultivating regions <strong>of</strong> the country.<br />

Results<br />

Construction <strong>of</strong> life tables<br />

The life table parameters viz., intrinsic rate <strong>of</strong> increase ‘rm’, net reproduction rate ‘Ro’,<br />

generation time ‘T’, and finite rate <strong>of</strong> increase ‘λ’ were estimated across six constant<br />

temperatures and at aCO2 and eCO2. Further, non-linear models were developed and depicted<br />

in figure 1. Results showed that ‘rm’ increased with an increase in temperature from 20°C and<br />

later started declining from 30°C and followed the non-linear trend at aCO 2 and eCO 2. The<br />

‘Ro’ <strong>of</strong> A. craccivora was higher (79.6) at 27°C with eCO2. The reduction <strong>of</strong> ‘T’ was evident<br />

from 20°C (12.47 days) to 35°C (6.67 days) at eCO 2 and followed the non-linear trend. ‘λ’, the<br />

indicator <strong>of</strong> the reproductive value <strong>of</strong> aphid was found to be increasing from 27-30°C and<br />

Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment<br />

732 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

followed the decreasing trend with further increase in temperature. The best fit quadratic form<br />

<strong>of</strong> the equation with R 2 at eCO 2 was noticed between ‘rm’ and temperature. Other parameters<br />

viz., ‘Ro’, ‘T’, and ‘λ’ followed a similar trend and in our study indicating that eCO 2 influenced<br />

the lifetable parameters <strong>of</strong> A. craccivora significantly as reported earlier by Xie et al. (2014).<br />

Relationship between temperature and life table parameters <strong>of</strong> A. craccivora on groundnut at eCO2 &<br />

Future pest status<br />

aCO2<br />

Across 6 groundnut growing locations <strong>of</strong> the country, it is projected that a substantial increase<br />

<strong>of</strong> mean temperature would occur during NF and DF climate change periods. The quantified<br />

associations <strong>of</strong> life table parameters with the temperature at two CO 2 conditions were adopted<br />

for predicting the future pest status during NF and DF periods. It was predicted that increased<br />

‘rm’ (1.04) and ‘λ’ (2.08) would occur at the Kadiri location during the DF period in<br />

comparison with BL and reflected a similar trend in the NF period also and at the rest <strong>of</strong> the<br />

locations. Increased ‘λ’ implies more females per female <strong>of</strong> A. craccivora per day. The<br />

reduction <strong>of</strong> ‘T’ to 8.96- 9.94 days and varied ‘Ro’ would occur at all locations studied during<br />

DF period over BL. The percent change in ‘rm’ and ‘λ’ was predicted to be significantly higher<br />

at six locations during both NF (up to 93 %) and DF (up to 131 %) periods. The highest percent<br />

reduction <strong>of</strong> generation time ‘T’ is expected to be in DF (up to 12 %) than NF period (up to 2<br />

%). At six locations, Ro was expected to increase in NF (11 %) and decrease during DF (22%)<br />

periods.<br />

Conclusion<br />

The life table parameters viz., ‘rm’ and ‘λ’ would increase with varied ‘Ro’ and reduced ‘T’ in<br />

NF and DF over BL at six groundnut locations implying the higher incidence <strong>of</strong> Aphis<br />

craccivora with a greater number <strong>of</strong> generations during future climate change periods.<br />

733 | Page Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Percent change in pest scenarios (R0 and T) during NF & DF climate change periods over baseline<br />

References<br />

Chi H (2005) TWO-SEX MS Chart; Computer Programe for Age-stage Twosex Life Table<br />

Analysis. National Cheung Hsing University, Taichung, Taiwan.<br />

Srinivasa Rao M, Padmaja PCM, Manimanjari D, Rao VUM, Maheswari M, et al. (2013)<br />

Response <strong>of</strong> Aphis craccivora Koch to elevated CO2 on cowpea. J. Agrometerol. 51: 51-<br />

56.<br />

Xie H, Zhao L, Wang W, Wang Z, Ni X, et al. (2014) Changes in Life History Parameters <strong>of</strong><br />

Rhopalosiphum maidis (Homoptera: Aphididae) under Four Different Elevated<br />

Temperature and CO2 Combinations. J. Econ. Entomol. 107: 1411-1418.<br />

Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment<br />

734 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

T5-16P-1111<br />

Mapping Quantitative Trait Nucleotides in Spring Wheat for Yield<br />

Performance under Limited Water Conditions<br />

Sonia Sheoran 1* , Arpit Gaur 1,2 , Yogesh Jindal 2 , Vikram Singh 2 , Ratan Tiwari 1 ,<br />

K. J. Yahavantha, Gyanendra Singh 1 and Gyanendra Pratap Singh 1<br />

1 ICAR-Indian Institute <strong>of</strong> Wheat and Barley Research, Karnal (123001), Haryana, India<br />

2 Chaudhary Charan Singh Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar (125001), Haryana, India<br />

* Sonia.Sheoran@icar.gov.in<br />

Spring wheat is one <strong>of</strong> the major food crops that provides promising opportunities for present<br />

and future global food security. However, the cultivation and production <strong>of</strong> spring wheat is<br />

critically getting affected with the shrinking natural resources including water. The increasing<br />

frequencies <strong>of</strong> agricultural drought in major spring wheat growing regions have become a<br />

limiting factor for the required grain production and meet the global demand <strong>of</strong> food security.<br />

Therefore, rigorous efforts are required to enhance the drought tolerance features in wheat and<br />

develop climate resilient varieties. Here, a panel <strong>of</strong> 302 diverse spring wheat lines was<br />

evaluated under irrigated (IR), rainfed (RF) and drought (DT) stress conditions at three<br />

locations (Karnal, Hisar and Pune). However, the drought trials were conducted at Karnal under<br />

rain out shelters and rainfed trials were conducted at Hisar and Pune. A total <strong>of</strong> fourteen<br />

agronomic traits: days to heading (DTH), days to anthesis (DTA), grain filling duration (GFD),<br />

days to maturity (DTM), number <strong>of</strong> tillers per plant (NOT), plant height (PH), peduncle length<br />

(PL), spike length (SL), spikelet per spike (SPS), biomass per plant (BM), grain yield per plant<br />

(GY), harvest index (HI), total number <strong>of</strong> grains per plant (TNG), and thousand kernel weight<br />

(TKW), were observed. Mixed linear analysis <strong>of</strong> variance (ANOVA) was calculated with<br />

ASREML-R and best linear unbiased estimates were calculated across environments pooled<br />

by water managements. The panel was genotypes using a 35K Axiom Wheat Breeders’ SNP<br />

array followed by SNP processing as per the standard procedures. A compressed mixed linear<br />

model was used to find out the valid associations between markers and traits (MTA) at -log10(p)<br />

≥ 3.0. The ANOVA indicated substantial genetic variability in the association under each trial<br />

and water management. The Q-Q plots indicated substantial controls over false-positive rate.<br />

A total <strong>of</strong> 637 MTAs were reported for observed traits under IR, RF and DT. These MTAs<br />

were distributed on all chromosomes. Maximum numbers <strong>of</strong> MTA were reported for BM (43),<br />

PL (63) and PH (32) under IR, RF and DT, respectively. The explained percentage <strong>of</strong><br />

phenotypic variance ranged for IR, RF and DT ranged from 4.13 to 52.34, 3.61 to 43.49 and<br />

3.46 to 22.49, respectively. The accumulation <strong>of</strong> favorable allele showed positive and<br />

polygenic impact on the grain yield under each management. The results were in agreement<br />

with previous studies and show considerable potential to strengthen the genomic assisted wheat<br />

breeding program to achieve the required rate <strong>of</strong> genetic gain.<br />

735 | Page Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

T5-17P-1117<br />

Effect <strong>of</strong> Mechanization Practices on Economics <strong>of</strong> Soyabean-Safflower<br />

Cropping System<br />

S. A. Shinde*, P. O. Bhutada and S. B. Ghuge<br />

All India Coordinate Research Project on Safflower, Vasantrao Naik Marathwada Krishi Vidyapeeth<br />

Parbhani, Maharashtra, India.<br />

* santoshashinde338@gmail.com<br />

Oilseed crops are the second most important determinant <strong>of</strong> an agricultural economy, next only<br />

to cereals within the segment <strong>of</strong> field crops. Among oilseeds Safflower (Carthamus tinctorius<br />

L.) is an important oilseed crop with 35-40 % oil. It has been used as a source <strong>of</strong> edible oil and<br />

dying since ancient times. Effective use <strong>of</strong> agriculture machinery helps to increase productivity<br />

and production <strong>of</strong> output and undertake timely farm operations. This judicious use <strong>of</strong> time,<br />

labour, and resources facilitate sustainable intensification and is timely. Planting <strong>of</strong> crops,<br />

leading to an increase in productivity. Hence Mechanical power has become more economical<br />

and indispensable to meet targets <strong>of</strong> timeliness and efficient utilization <strong>of</strong> natural resources and<br />

inputs (Srinivasarao et al., 2013) Mechanization in safflower crop will help to timely field<br />

operations and easy harvesting and save huge cost <strong>of</strong> cultivation and sort the labour problem<br />

<strong>of</strong> the farmer. This study is therefore carried out to determine suitable mechanization practices<br />

in safflower.<br />

Methodology<br />

A field experiment was conducted during the period <strong>of</strong> 2020-21 at All India co-ordinated<br />

Research Project on Safflower, V.N.M.K.V., Parbhani. The soil was clayey in texture, low in<br />

available nitrogen (231 kg ha -1 ), low in available phosphorus (12.64 kg ha -1 ), rich in available<br />

potash (474 kg ha -1 ), sulphur (15.25 kg ha -1 ), and slightly alkaline in reaction. The soil was<br />

moderately alkaline in reaction (8.13 pH). In general, weather conditions were favourable for<br />

plant growth, and no severe pests and diseases were noticed during experimentation. The study<br />

involved two treatment combinations <strong>of</strong> two factors viz., Selective mechanization plot (SMP)<br />

and Farmer practice (FP) with two treatments. Each experimental unit was non-replicated<br />

having a Plot size <strong>of</strong> 1000 m 2 for each <strong>of</strong> the mechanical and normal plots. Sowing was<br />

completed as per treatments. Safflower variety PBNS -86 was sown at a spacing <strong>of</strong> 45 cm<br />

(between rows) X 20 cm (between Plants) The fertilizer dose <strong>of</strong> 60:40:00 NPK kg ha -1 was<br />

applied at the time <strong>of</strong> sowing. The package <strong>of</strong> recommended practices was adopted. The data<br />

on growth and yield parameters were analyzed with paired ‘t’ test and cost <strong>of</strong> cultivation, net<br />

returns, and B: C ratio was worked out. Data on the time period for each operation, and energy<br />

used were converted into suitable energy units and expressed in MJ/ha. Energy equivalents <strong>of</strong><br />

inputs and outputs were computed based on values suggested by Gopalan et al. (1978) The<br />

Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment<br />

736 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

calculation <strong>of</strong> energy input and output equivalents, the indices <strong>of</strong> energy ratio (energy use<br />

efficiency), energy productivity, and net energy were calculated (Rafiee et al., 2010) as<br />

follows:<br />

S.No<br />

1 Sowing<br />

Name <strong>of</strong> field<br />

operation<br />

Energy ratio =<br />

Energy Productivity =<br />

Energy output (MJ/ha)<br />

Energy input (MJ/ha)<br />

Safflower yield (Kg/ha)<br />

Energy input (MJ/ha)<br />

Net Energy = Energy output (MJ/ha) – Energy input (MJ/ha)<br />

Mechanized condition<br />

With Seed cum Fertilizer<br />

Drill<br />

Farmer's practice<br />

Behind the bullock-drawn plough<br />

2 Inter cultivation Power weeder Bullock drew Danthi<br />

3 Plant protection Motorized/ power sprayers Knapsack sprayer<br />

4<br />

Harvesting, threshing,<br />

and winnowing<br />

Combiner with minute<br />

modification<br />

Manual<br />

Following parameters selected under selective mechanization vis-à-vis Farmer's practice in<br />

terms <strong>of</strong> yield, economics, and energy budgeting <strong>of</strong> Safflower<br />

Results<br />

From table, it is found that safflower seed yield (1485 kg/ha) was higher than farmer practice<br />

(1251 kg/ha). The seed yield <strong>of</strong> safflower was increased by 18.70% observed under mechanized<br />

conditions compared to the farmer's practice. Proper plant-to-plant population and optimum<br />

management practice can be adopted under mechanization than farmer practice which helps to<br />

increase or record good growth <strong>of</strong> crops than farmer practice. Further, the cost <strong>of</strong> cultivation<br />

incurred for the normal method <strong>of</strong> cultivation was higher (53921) compared to mechanized<br />

safflower cultivation (45101) leading to higher net returns (100699) and B: C ratio (3.20) in<br />

the mechanized plot. Comparing the yield and economics <strong>of</strong> cultivation methods, mechanized<br />

plot reduced the labour requirement, time <strong>of</strong> operation and cultivation cost, in turn, resulted in<br />

higher benefits. The energy use efficiency in the mechanized plot (0.56 kg/MJ) was higher than<br />

the normal plot (0.27 kg/MJ). This led to saving 17 labour/ha and saved 35 hrs time period/ha<br />

through selective mechanization <strong>of</strong> important operations.<br />

737 | Page Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Safflower yield, system economics under mechanized cultivation vs farmer's practice<br />

Treatments<br />

Mechanized<br />

conditions<br />

Farmer's<br />

practice<br />

Seed yield<br />

(kg/ha)<br />

Biological yield<br />

(kg/ha)<br />

Soybean Safflower Soybean Safflower<br />

Gross<br />

returns<br />

(Rs/ha)<br />

System economics<br />

Cost <strong>of</strong><br />

cultivation<br />

(Rs/ha)<br />

Net<br />

returns<br />

(Rs/ha)<br />

B: C<br />

ratio<br />

1755 1485 4920 4725 145800 45101 100699 3.2<br />

1571 1251 4400 3865 126990 53921 73069 2.4<br />

References<br />

Gopalan, C. B., Ramasastri, V. and Balasubramanian, S. C. 1978 Nutritive value <strong>of</strong> Indian<br />

foods (Hyderbad: National Institute<strong>of</strong> Nutrition)<br />

Rafiee S, Mousavi Avval, S. H. and Mohammadi A. 2010. Modeling and sensitivity analysis<br />

<strong>of</strong> energy inputs for apple production in Iran. Energy, 35:3301-3306<br />

T5-18P-1140<br />

Effect <strong>of</strong> Nano-DAP Application in Combination with Conventional<br />

Fertilizers on Rice-Rapeseed Sequence under Rain-Fed Condition<br />

Dhananjoy Dutta and Manimala Mahato<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Agronomy, Bidhan Chandra Krishi Viswavidyalaya,<br />

Mohanpur-741252, West Bengal, India<br />

Excessive use <strong>of</strong> DAP fertilizer in rice production <strong>of</strong> West Bengal resulted several soil and<br />

environment hazards. The overall efficiency <strong>of</strong> applied fertilizer has also been declined, which<br />

necessitates alternative nutrient management. Hence, attempts were being made to find out the<br />

effect <strong>of</strong> nano-DAP as an alternative source <strong>of</strong> conventional fertilizer on growth, yield and<br />

economics <strong>of</strong> rice-rapeseed predominant crop sequence.<br />

Methodology<br />

Field experiment was conducted during 2021-22 at Department <strong>of</strong> Agronomy, B.C.K.V, West<br />

Bengal in a randomized block design with three replications where transplanted rice (cv. IET-<br />

4786) grown in kharif season (July-October) under rain-fed condition with thirteen treatments<br />

(Table 1) followed by rapeseed (cv. B-9) in rabi season (November-February) under ten<br />

treatments (Table 2) in sandy clay loam with pH 6.65, organic carbon 5.8 g/kg, available N<br />

159.2 kg/kg, available P 2O 5 44.9 kg/kg and available K 2O 101.8 kg/kg. As per treatment, nano<br />

DAP was applied through seed treatment, seedlings root dipping and foliar spray along with<br />

conventional DAP, urea SSP and MOP fertilizers. Rainfall in rice and rapeseed growing period<br />

Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment<br />

738 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

was 995 and 194 mm respectively. Other standard agronomic package <strong>of</strong> practices were<br />

followed both the crops.<br />

Results<br />

Results revealed that 50% basal N and P through DAP along with seed treatment by nano-DAP<br />

@ 5 ml/kg seed and foliar spray <strong>of</strong> nano-DAP @ 2 ml/lit at 30 DAT exhibited maximum plant<br />

height (101.03 cm), LAI (2.48), dry matter accumulation (1006.38 g/m 2 ), tiller number/hill<br />

(17.67), root length/hill (27.23 cm), number <strong>of</strong> panicle/m 2 (170.92), number <strong>of</strong> grains/panicle<br />

(113.48), grain yield (4250 kg/ha), straw yield (6378 kg/ha) <strong>of</strong> rice. This treatment enhanced<br />

14.96% <strong>of</strong> grain yield over control (no basal DAP) and also showed higher net return (Rs.<br />

40358/ha) and benefit-cost ratio (1.93) than others. In rapeseed, the tallest plant (95.95 cm),<br />

highest values <strong>of</strong> leaf area index (3.51), dry matter accumulation (410.32 g/m 2 ) and primary<br />

branches/plant (8.87) were obtained with N75 P75 K100 + nano DAP seed treatment @ 5 ml/ kg<br />

seed & foliar spray @ 0.2% at 30 DAS and the lowest growth was observed in control plots<br />

(N 0 P 0 K 100). No. <strong>of</strong> siliquas/plant (60.90), no. <strong>of</strong> seeds/siliqua (17.12), seed yield (767 kg/ha),<br />

straw yield (1540 kg/ha), gross return (Rs. 46020/ha), net return (Rs. 22661/ha) and benefitcost<br />

ratio (1.97) were also highest under this treatment, which increased seed yield by 21.38 %<br />

over control.<br />

Conclusion<br />

The preliminary study showed the promising effect <strong>of</strong> nano-DAP as seed treatment @ 5 ml/kg<br />

seed and foliar application @ 2 ml/lit at 30 DAT along with 100% recommended doses <strong>of</strong> NPK<br />

in rice where 50% basal N and P applied through DAP, therefore, curtailed 50% DAP<br />

requirement. Again, nano DAP @ 5 ml/ kg seed treatment and @ 0.2% foliar spray at 30 DAS<br />

reduced 25% N and P requirement without affecting rapeseed yield. However, the study needs<br />

few more years for recommendations to the farmers.<br />

Effect <strong>of</strong> nano-DAP on growth parameters, yield <strong>of</strong> Kharif rice in 2021<br />

Treatments<br />

Plant height<br />

(cm)<br />

Panicles/m 2<br />

Grain yield<br />

(kg/ha)<br />

Benefit-cost<br />

ratio<br />

T 1 : 0% P & 0% Basal N (No Basal DAP); 100% N<br />

&K (Control)<br />

95.73 155.56 3697 1.80<br />

T 2 :100% NPK (100% Basal DAP) 99.20 166.12 3945 1.80<br />

T 3 :25% Basal DAP (100% NPK) 97.01 160.87 3743 1.73<br />

T 4 :50% Basal DAP (100% NPK) 97.26 161.58 3895 1.79<br />

T 5 :T 1 + ST with Nano-DAP @ 2.5 ml/kg seed+ FS<br />

with Nano-DAP @ 2 ml/lit at 30 DAT<br />

T 6 :T 1 + ST with Nano-DAP @5 ml/kg seed+ FS with<br />

Nano-DAP @ 2ml/lit at 30 DAT<br />

98.18 164.77 3885 1.87<br />

98.43 165.02 3895 1.87<br />

739 | Page Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

T 7 :T 3 + ST with Nano-DAP @ 2.5 ml/kg seed + FS<br />

with Nano-DAP @ 2 ml/lit at 30 DAT<br />

100.33 166.31 4088 1.87<br />

T 8 :T 3 + ST with Nano-DAP @ 5 ml/kg seed+ FS with<br />

Nano-DAP @ 2ml/lit at 30 DAT<br />

T 9 :T 4 + ST with Nano-DAP @ 2.5 ml/kg seed+ FS<br />

with Nano-DAP @ 2 ml/lit at 30 DAT<br />

T 10 :T 4 + ST with Nano-DAP @ 5 ml/kg seed+ FS<br />

with Nano-DAP @ 2ml/lit at 30 DAT<br />

T 11 :T 1 + SRD with Nano-DAP @ 0.5%+ FS with<br />

Nano-DAP @ 2ml/lit at 30 DAT<br />

T 12 :T 3 + SRD with Nano-DAP @ 0.5%+FS with<br />

Nano-DAP @ 2ml/lit at 30 DAT<br />

T 13 :T 4 +SRD with Nano-DAP @ 0.5%+ FS with<br />

Nano-DAP @ 2ml/lit at 30 DAT<br />

100.43 169.25 4121 1.88<br />

100.47 170.65 4213 1.91<br />

101.03 170.92 4250 1.93<br />

97.90 163.04 3889 1.86<br />

98.83 165.43 3997 1.82<br />

99.07 165.98 4033 1.80<br />

CD at 5% 1.47 4.34 134<br />

ST = Seed treatment, FS = Foliar spray, SRD = Seedlings root dipping, 100% NPK= 60:30:30kg/ha<br />

Effect <strong>of</strong> Nano-DAP on growth parameters, yield <strong>of</strong> rapeseed during 2021-22<br />

Treatments<br />

Plant height<br />

(cm)<br />

Siliquas/<br />

plant<br />

Seed yield<br />

(kg/ha)<br />

Benefitcost<br />

ratio<br />

T 1: N 0 P 0 K 100 (control) 85.03 41.96 603 1.84<br />

T 2: N 100 P 100 K 100 (80:40:40 kg/ha) 93.37 56.07 752 1.89<br />

T 3: N 0 P 0 K 100+ Nano DAP (ST @ 5ml/kg seed) 87.77 45.00 626 1.91<br />

T 4: N 0 P 0 K 100 + Nano DAP (ST @ 10ml/kg seed) 88.19 46.53 633 1.93<br />

T 5: N 0 P 0 K 100+ Nano DAP (FS @ 0.6% at 30 DAS) 90.92 48.60 670 1.90<br />

T 6: N 0 P 0 K 100 + Nano DAP (ST @ 5ml/kg seed & FS<br />

@ 0.6% at 30 DAS)<br />

91.46 51.13 679 1.92<br />

T 7: N 75 P 75 K 100 + Nano DAP (FS @ 0.2% at 30 DAS) 93.22 58.76 738 1.90<br />

T 8: N 75 P 75 K 100 + Nano DAP (ST @ 5 ml/ kg seed &<br />

FS @ 0.2% at 30 DAS)<br />

95.95 60.90 767 1.97<br />

T 9: N 50 P 50 K 100 + Nano DAP (FS @ 0.4% at 30 DAS) 92.18 53.40 693 1.82<br />

T 10: N 50 P 50 K 100 + Nano DAP (ST @ 5ml/ kg seed &<br />

FS @ 0.4% at 30 DAS)<br />

93.77 60.13 709 1.87<br />

CD at 5% 2.71 1.21 15.7<br />

ST = Seed treatment and FS = Foliar spray<br />

Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment<br />

740 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

T5-19P-1141<br />

Effect <strong>of</strong> Nano Fertilizers on Growth Yield and Water Use Efficiency <strong>of</strong><br />

Potato (Solanum tuberosum l.) under Varying Irrigation Schedules<br />

Manimala Mahato and Dhananjoy Dutta<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Agronomy, Bidhan Chandra Krishi Viswavidyalaya,<br />

Mohanpur, Nadia, West Bengal, India 741252<br />

Indiscriminate and over application <strong>of</strong> irrigation water and chemical fertilizers led to several<br />

detrimental effects on crop production system and environment. Therefore, introduction <strong>of</strong><br />

nano fertilizers as an alternative source <strong>of</strong> conventional fertilizers has become a new area <strong>of</strong><br />

research. Besides that, irrational irrigation to water demanding crop, like potato during the post<br />

monsoon season affects the growth and productivity. Therefore, a field experiment was<br />

delineated with the objective to assess the effect <strong>of</strong> nano fertilizers on growth, yield and water<br />

use efficiency <strong>of</strong> potato under various irrigation schedules based on cumulative pan<br />

evaporation (CPE).<br />

Methodology<br />

Field experiment was conducted at B.C.K.V. during rabi seasons <strong>of</strong> 2019-20 and 2020-21 in<br />

sandy loam alluvial soil (inceptisol) designed in split plot with three irrigation schedules at I 1-<br />

15 mm, I 2-30 mm and I 3-45 mm <strong>of</strong> CPE kept as main plot treatments and five nutrient<br />

management practices like N1-100% RDF (200:150:150 kg/ha <strong>of</strong> N: P2O5: K2O), N2-75%<br />

RDF+ nano fertilizers (N, P, K at 80:40:40 ppm), N 3-100% RDF+ Nano-Zn (10 ppm), N 4-75%<br />

RDF+ nano fertilizers (N, P, K and Zn at 80:40:40:10 ppm) and N5-Nano-fertilizers (N, P, K<br />

at 80:40:40 ppm) as subplot treatments replicated thrice. All nano fertilizers were applied as<br />

foliar spray at 25 and 50 DAP. Potato (variety Kufri Himalini) was planted in 60 cm ×15 cm<br />

spacing during middle <strong>of</strong> November in 4.8 m × 3 m plot along with other standard package <strong>of</strong><br />

practices.<br />

Results<br />

Pooled result reported that irrigation at 15 mm CPE along with 100% RDF and Nano-Zn (10<br />

ppm) (I 1N 3) treatments recorded significantly higher plant height (61.76 cm) at 60 DAP, dry<br />

matter accumulation (579.85 g m -2 ) at 90 DAP, tuber no per hill (8.59) and tuber yield (23.04<br />

t ha -1 ). In all cases lower values were obtained from irrigation at 45 mm CPE with nano<br />

fertilizers (N, P, K) alone treatment (I 3N 5). However, irrigation at 45 CPE along with 100%<br />

RDF and Nano-Zn (10 ppm) (I3N3) treatment recorded higher water use efficiency (9.96 kg m -3 ).<br />

741 | Page Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Conclusion<br />

The study concluded that irrigation at 15 CPE and 100% RDF along with Nano-Zn (10 ppm)<br />

can be recommended for higher productivity <strong>of</strong> potato. However, in water scarce region,<br />

irrigation at 45 CPE along with 100% RDF and Nano-Zn (10 ppm) may be effective due to<br />

highest water use efficiency.<br />

Effect <strong>of</strong> irrigation and nutrient management on growth, yield and water use efficiency<br />

<strong>of</strong> potato (pooled)<br />

Treatments<br />

Plant height<br />

(cm)<br />

(60 DAP)<br />

Dry matter<br />

(g m -2 )<br />

(90 DAP)<br />

Tuber no<br />

per hill<br />

Yield<br />

(t ha -1 )<br />

WUE<br />

(kg m -3 )<br />

Irrigation (I)<br />

I 1 (15 mm CPE) 57.93 476.72 7.71 19.57 4.70<br />

I 2 (30 mm CPE) 51.00 367.96 5.68 15.41 6.96<br />

I 3 (45 mm CPE) 47.07 297.23 4.46 12.31 8.03<br />

S. Em. (±) 0.19 4.78 0.05 0.11 --<br />

C. D. (P= 0.05) 0.73 18.75 0.19 0.41 --<br />

Nutrient Management (N)<br />

N 1 (100% RDF) 53.07 403.29 6.38 17.11 6.46<br />

N 2[75% RDF + NF (N, P, K)] 51.42 371.83 6.13 16.01 6.06<br />

N 3 (100% RDF+ N-Zn) 55.73 473.46 6.70 19.02 7.20<br />

N 4[75%RDF+NF (N, P, K, Zn)] 54.17 439.11 6.25 18.15 6.88<br />

N 5 [NF (N, P, K)] 45.60 215.49 4.28 8.53 3.23<br />

S. Em. (±) 0.14 3.70 0.05 0.12 --<br />

C. D. (P= 0.05) 0.40 10.79 0.15 0.34 --<br />

Interaction (I × N)<br />

I1N1 58.87 510.69 8.18 21.47 5.14<br />

I1N2 57.07 468.32 7.93 19.88 4.78<br />

I1N3 61.76 579.85 8.59 23.04 5.54<br />

I1N4 59.60 545.07 8.06 22.41 5.38<br />

I1N5 52.36 279.65 5.77 11.07 2.66<br />

I2N1 52.29 381.75 5.98 16.57 7.47<br />

I2N2 50.44 357.38 6.03 15.81 7.12<br />

I2N3 54.59 465.10 6.35 18.74 8.48<br />

I2N4 53.66 420.80 6.01 17.60 7.98<br />

I2N5 44.03 214.78 4.03 8.31 3.76<br />

I3N1 48.06 317.42 4.98 13.29 8.67<br />

I3N2 46.76 289.78 4.43 12.33 8.04<br />

I3N3 50.86 375.43 5.16 15.29 9.96<br />

I3N4 49.25 351.48 4.69 14.44 9.44<br />

I3N5 40.41 152.05 3.04 6.21 4.05<br />

I×N N×I I×N N×I I×N N×I I×N<br />

N×I<br />

S. Em. (±)<br />

0.20 --<br />

0.24 0.40 6.40 10.55 0.09 0.13 0.29<br />

C. D. (P= 0.05)<br />

0.59 --<br />

0.69 0.95 18.69 24.85 0.26 0.30 0.66<br />

NF: Nano Fertilizers, N-Zn: Nano Zn<br />

Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment<br />

742 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Soil Moisture and Weather Data Management Using IoT<br />

T5-20P-1165<br />

N. S. Raju, N. Ravi Kumar, R. Nagarjuna Kumar, K. S. Reddy and B. Sanjeev Reddy<br />

Central Research for Dryland Agriculture, Hyderabad.<br />

The application <strong>of</strong> IoT in agriculture could be a life-changer for humanity and the whole planet.<br />

Currently, we witness how extreme weather, deteriorating soil, dry lands, and collapsing<br />

ecosystems make food production more and more complicated and expensive. In India, where<br />

60-70% economy depends on agriculture, there is a great need to modernize conventional<br />

agricultural practices for better productivity. In this project, we have established IOT sensor<br />

Network with ESP 8266 (Node MCU) Microcontroller board and other sensors LM 100 is a<br />

Soil moisture sensor, DHT11 for Temperature, a humidity sensor, and a Raindrop sensor to<br />

collect rainfall information. We have collected data from the IoT sensors are that then<br />

transmitted back to a central point (or the cloud) for analysis, visualization, and trend analysis.<br />

The complete system has been developed and deployed on a pilot scale, where the sensor node<br />

data is wirelessly collected using web services into a remote server. The temperature, humidity,<br />

soil moisture, and rainfall information is collected in 10 minutes intervals and transferred to<br />

remote locations with Arduino Wi-Fi technology. The data stored in this system can be<br />

accessed from anywhere through the internet. Farmers today use systems for precision<br />

measurement <strong>of</strong> environmental conditions called weather stations. Automatic Weather<br />

Station (AWS) is used for real-time information on weather at the farm level but it is not<br />

affordable to the farming community. The alternative system for the measurement <strong>of</strong> weather<br />

parameters through IoT-based weather monitoring through sensors is much cheaper compared<br />

to the present cost <strong>of</strong> AWS.<br />

Internet <strong>of</strong> Things (IOT):<br />

It is the future technology <strong>of</strong> connecting the entire world at one place. All the objects, things<br />

and sensors can be connected to share the data obtained in various locations and<br />

process/analyses that data for coordinating the applications like traffic signaling, mobile<br />

health monitoring in medical applications and industrial safety ensuring methods, etc. As<br />

per the estimation <strong>of</strong> technological experts, 50 billion objects will be connected in IOT by 2020.<br />

IOT <strong>of</strong>fers wide range <strong>of</strong> connectivity <strong>of</strong> devices with various protocols and various properties<br />

<strong>of</strong> applications for obtaining the complete machine to machine interaction.<br />

Internet <strong>of</strong> Things (IoT):<br />

IoT device includes every object that can be controlled through the Internet. IoT in agriculture<br />

uses robots, drones, remote sensors, and computer imaging combined with continuously<br />

progressing machine learning and analytical tools for monitoring crops, surveying, and<br />

743 | Page Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

mapping the fields, and providing data to farmers for rational farm management plans to save<br />

both time and money. All the objects, things, and sensors can be connected to share the data<br />

obtained in various locations and process/analyses that data for coordinating the various<br />

applications. As per the estimation <strong>of</strong> technological experts, 50 billion objects will be<br />

connected in IoT by 2020.<br />

Methodology<br />

In IoT enabled weather monitoring system different sensors were used (temperature, humidity,<br />

moisture, rain). These four sensors are directly connected to Node MCU.<br />

Temperature<br />

Humidity Sensor<br />

Soil Moisture Sensor<br />

Arduino Uno<br />

Node MCU<br />

Microcontroller<br />

IoT Sensor Network<br />

Wi Fi Module<br />

Web Page<br />

Arduino Uno is a microcontroller board developed by Arduino which is an open-source<br />

electronics platform mainly based on the VR microcontroller Atmega328. The current version<br />

<strong>of</strong> Arduino Uno comes with a USB interface, 6 analog input pins, and 14 I/O digital ports that<br />

are used to connect with external electronic circuits. Out <strong>of</strong> 14 I/O ports, 6 pins can be used for<br />

WM output. It allows the designers to control and sense external electronic devices in the real<br />

world. This board comes with all the features required to run the controller and can be directly<br />

connected to the computer through a USB cable that is used to transfer the code to the controller<br />

using IDE s<strong>of</strong>tware, mainly developed to program Arduino. Programming languages like C<br />

and C++ are used in IDE. Apart from USB, a battery or AC to DC adopter can also be used to<br />

power the board. Arduino Uno is the most <strong>of</strong>ficial version that come with Atmega 328 8-bit<br />

AVR Atmel microcontroller where RAM memory is 32KB<br />

Node MCU<br />

Node MCU is a microcontroller board developed by Arduino. Which is an open-source<br />

electronics platform mainly based on the AVR microcontroller Atmega328. The current<br />

version <strong>of</strong> Node MCU comes with a USB interface, 6 analog input pins, and 14 I/O digital<br />

ports that are used to connect with external electronic circuits. Out <strong>of</strong> 14 I/O ports, 6 pins can<br />

be used for PWM output. It allows the designers to control and sense external electronic devices<br />

in the real world. This microcontroller has RAM memory 32KB.<br />

Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment<br />

744 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Wi-Fi Module<br />

The Arduino Uno WiFi is an Arduino Uno with an integrated WiFi module. The board is based<br />

on the ATmega328P with an ESP8266 WiFi Module integrated. The ESP8266 WiFi Module<br />

is a self-contained SoC with an integrated TCP/IP protocol stack that can give access to your<br />

WiFi network One useful feature <strong>of</strong> Uno WiFi is support for OTA (over-the-air) programming,<br />

either for transfer <strong>of</strong> Arduino sketches or WiFi firmware.<br />

Soil Moisture Sensor<br />

Soil moisture sensors measure the contents <strong>of</strong> the soil. Since the direct gravimetric<br />

measurement <strong>of</strong> free-soil moisture requires removing, drying, and weighting <strong>of</strong> a sample, soil<br />

moisture sensors measure the volumetric water content indirectly by using some other property<br />

<strong>of</strong> the soil, such as electrical resistance, dielectric constant, or interaction with neutrons, as a<br />

proxy for the moisture content. Reflected microwave radiation is affected by soil moisture and<br />

is used for remote sensing in hydrology and agriculture. Portable probe instruments can be used<br />

by farmers or gardeners.<br />

Temperature & Humidity Sensor<br />

This DHT11 sensor is used to collect the Temperature and Humidity data from the<br />

environments. It is integrated with a high-performance 8-bit microcontroller. Each DHT11<br />

sensor features extremely accurately.<br />

Results<br />

The sensed data will be automatically sent to the web server when a proper connection is<br />

established with the server device. The web server page which will allow us to monitor and<br />

control the system. The web page gives information about the temperature, humidity, and<br />

rainfall variations in the region, where the embedded monitoring system is placed.<br />

Conclusion<br />

This paper presents an innovative and dependable concept <strong>of</strong> a low-cost simple weather<br />

monitoring and controlling system. The system operates under IoT technology supervision<br />

which effectively optimizes remote areas. This data will be helpful for future analysis and it<br />

can be easily shared with other users also.<br />

745 | Page Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

T5-21P-1166<br />

Comparative Study on Spatial and Temporal Changes in Urban Settlements<br />

and Land Surface Temperature in Hyderabad over 1990 to 2020<br />

Fawaz Parapurath*, B. S. Rath, Deepti Verma, N. Manikandan and A.V.M. Subba Rao<br />

Odisha University <strong>of</strong> Agriculture and Technology, Bhubaneswar – 751003, Odisha, India<br />

ICAR-Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, Hyderabad – 500059, Telangana, India<br />

* faazzz96here@gmail.com<br />

Land Surface Temperature (LST) is a crucial urban and regional meteorological component<br />

that affects how the ground surface interacts with the atmosphere. LST is considered a<br />

significant parameter in many scientific research studies, including global climate change<br />

studies, agricultural processes, and various biogeochemical cycles. The dynamics <strong>of</strong> LST and<br />

Land Use Land Cover (LULC), are important markers <strong>of</strong> forest fragmentation,<br />

industrialization, and urbanization. Unplanned urbanization results in LULC pattern alterations<br />

on a broad scale, which results in ecosystem damage and has a negative impact on public health,<br />

particularly in developing nations. In this work, we used Landsat 5 and 8 imageries to analyze<br />

the LST variations in Hyderabad from 1990 to 2020. The specific objectives <strong>of</strong> this study were<br />

to compute the change in LULC and LST during the study period and to establish the<br />

relationship between land surface temperature and urban settlements.<br />

Methodology<br />

Landsat 5<br />

TM<br />

LULC Map<br />

Landsat 8<br />

OLI<br />

LULC change detection analysis<br />

Spectral Radiance Model<br />

TM Band<br />

Split Window Algorithm<br />

(TIRS) Band 10 & Band 11<br />

LST Map<br />

Impact <strong>of</strong> LULC change on LST<br />

LST Map<br />

Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment<br />

746 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

The methodological framework adopted for analyzing variation in land surface temperature<br />

distribution in response to land use/land cover change using the Split window algorithm (TIRS,<br />

Landsat-8) and Spectral radiance model (TM, Landsat-5) is represented in the figure above.<br />

Results<br />

LULC change detection: The change detection study reveals that Built-up area/Urban<br />

settlements have increased by 10 sq. km and Vegetation land decreased by 7.5 sq. km with no<br />

considerable land use change in Water bodies from 1990 to 2020.<br />

LST change detection: The year-wise LST conveys that, the average land surface temperature<br />

has increased by 4.5 0 C from 1990 to 2020. During the time period from 2010 to 2020, LST<br />

increased by a maximum rate (3.2 0 C).<br />

Spatial and Temporal distribution <strong>of</strong> LST in Hyderabad over 1990-2020<br />

Relationship between LST and Urban Settlements: The time series analysis <strong>of</strong> LST and urban<br />

settlements revealed that LST increases correspondingly with the increase in settlements since<br />

there is a strong correlation (r = 0.94).<br />

747 | Page Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

250<br />

y = 0.33x - 474.9<br />

182 185 188 192<br />

R² = 0.9945<br />

200<br />

150<br />

100<br />

y = 0.143x - 258.64<br />

26.5 27 27.8 R² = 0.8335 31<br />

50<br />

0<br />

1990 2000 2010 2020<br />

Year<br />

Land Surface Temperature (0C)<br />

Linear (Land Surface Temperature (0C))<br />

Urban Settlements (Sq.km)<br />

Linear (Urban Settlements (Sq.km))<br />

Comparison between LST and Urban Settlements over 1990-2020<br />

Conclusion<br />

To develop successful strategies to reduce the amplitude <strong>of</strong> the Urban Heat Island effect, it is<br />

critical to comprehend the relationship between LST and urban surface features. It is also<br />

possible to immediately determine the crop water status or the rate <strong>of</strong> transpiration using the<br />

surface temperature <strong>of</strong> the vegetation as measured by remote sensing. However, trees are<br />

crucial in densely populated metropolitan areas because they provide a cooling effect during<br />

hot weather that has a direct impact on the microclimate.<br />

References<br />

Guo, G, Wu Z, Xiao R, Chen Y, Liu X. and Zhang X, 2015. Impacts <strong>of</strong> urban biophysical<br />

composition on land surface temperature in urban heat island clusters. Landsc Urban<br />

Plan. 135: 1-10.<br />

Roy, B., Bari, E., Nipa, N. J. and Ani, S. A. 2021. Comparison <strong>of</strong> temporal changes in urban<br />

settlements and land surface temperature in Rangpur and Gazipur Sadar, Bangladesh<br />

after the establishment <strong>of</strong> City Corporation. Remote Sens. Appl.: Soc.<br />

Environ. 23:100587.<br />

Rozenstein, O., Qin Z, Derimian Y. and Karnieli A. 2014. Derivation <strong>of</strong> land surface<br />

temperature for Landsat-8 TIRS using a split window algorithm. Sensors. 14(4): 5768-<br />

5780.<br />

Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment<br />

748 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

T5-22P-1178<br />

Usefulness <strong>of</strong> Agro-Meteorological Advisory Service from Farmers<br />

Prospective in the NICRA Operated Villages <strong>of</strong> Godda District<br />

Jharkhand<br />

Rajnish Prasad Rajesh, Ravi Shanker, Surya Bhushan, Anjani Kumar,<br />

Amarendra Kumar and Mukesh Kumar<br />

GVT-KVK, Godda, Jharkhand Director - ATARI-IV, Patna,<br />

Godda is one <strong>of</strong> the most backward districts <strong>of</strong> India situated in Santhal Pargana <strong>of</strong> Jharkhand<br />

state. Farmers <strong>of</strong> this district are largely dependent on agriculture-based economy. Majority <strong>of</strong><br />

the farmers largely comes under the category <strong>of</strong> small and marginal. The only source <strong>of</strong> income<br />

is the small piece <strong>of</strong> land for earning means <strong>of</strong> livelihood. Agriculture over the years has now<br />

become more diversified in the district and has shifted to the higher value crops. The trend <strong>of</strong><br />

climate change is causing deviation in rainfall patterns. Scanty, spatial rainfall and intermittent<br />

dry spells are also affecting the climate change prone area frequently. In this direction, National<br />

Innovation on Climate Resilient Agriculture (NICRA) is working in four climate vulnerable<br />

villages viz. Bhelwa, Dropad, Gadhi and Gunghasa <strong>of</strong> Poraiyahat block <strong>of</strong> the district Godda.<br />

The district requires an integrated approach for the proper management practices <strong>of</strong> crops,<br />

livestock and soil along with the new improved technologies. In the present scenario The study<br />

assessed the service through the farmer’s feedback in the NICRA and non-NICRA villages.<br />

Baethgen et al., 2003 stated that the AAS is essential for the development <strong>of</strong> farmers and the<br />

formal and informal knowledge play a key role in the decision-making process in the<br />

agricultural practices. Agro-meteorological advisory service was found a vital element for<br />

farmer’s knowledge as well as their mindset so a proper coordination among various<br />

development actors like GO, NGO, private agencies and policy makers need to be strengthened<br />

to reduce climate change (Lenka et al., 2022). Agro-met Advisory Service can contribute to<br />

the crop and livestock management practices as per the weather conditions and need <strong>of</strong> the<br />

hour for enhancing the agricultural production and productivity. AAS is the real time need <strong>of</strong><br />

the farmers (Gandhi et al; 2018).<br />

AAS were helpful to the farmers for pr<strong>of</strong>itable and sustainable agricultural production by<br />

managing the climate risk effectively (Ramachandrappa et al., 2018). Micro level weather<br />

advisories with ground realities and information can readily be used in making crucial decision<br />

and strategies in farming are much more realistic to the farmers as compared to the<br />

meteorological information <strong>of</strong> macro level. This information will enable the policymakers to<br />

understand at micro level implications <strong>of</strong> agriculture contingent measures against climate<br />

change.<br />

749 | Page Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Methodology<br />

This study is a kind <strong>of</strong> test control study which is a combination <strong>of</strong> both quantitative and<br />

qualitative research techniques to compare the (test groups) NICRA farmers against (the<br />

control groups) non-NICRA farmers from villages Bhelwa, Dropad, Gadhi and Gunghasa <strong>of</strong><br />

Godda district were selected based on the agro-ecological variation. Random sampling method<br />

has been followed for the selection <strong>of</strong> respondent farmers. The period <strong>of</strong> study and assessment<br />

were from 2020-21 to 2021-22 through the feedbacks and suggestions collected from the<br />

farmers in the NICRA and non-NICRA villages. Four villages <strong>of</strong> one block Poraiyahat were<br />

selected under the NICRA project and one non-NICRA village was selected randomly. 30<br />

farmers were selected in the selected each NICRA village by following random process. Total<br />

<strong>of</strong> 120 farmers from NICRA villages and 50 non-NICRA farmers were selected in the sample.<br />

The three-point rating scale was conducted for obtaining the score. Farmers were interviewed<br />

by researchers in the selected villages for the primary data collection. Focus Group Discussion<br />

was conducted among farmers to obtain the information. Collected data were then scrutinized<br />

for the analysis.<br />

Results<br />

Weather Advisory service plays a very crucial role in deciding farming activities during the<br />

different cropping season. The advisory is the real time need <strong>of</strong> farmers to decide agricultural<br />

and livestock management and practices. Table 1 shows that 30.83% farmers considered<br />

weather advisory very useful and 27.49% farmers useful. Whereas about 23.32% farmers are<br />

satisfied with the advisory but 18.33% found it irrelevant. In non-NICRA villages more than<br />

50% farmers expressed that the weather advisory service is either satisfactory or irrelevant for<br />

them. The weather forecasting need to be more accurate and on time specially during the<br />

monsoon. Hence, the weather advisory needs to be explored in much better way to reach the<br />

farmers on time so as to tackle and mitigate the climatic hazards. In the selected NICRA village,<br />

the scenario <strong>of</strong> weather advisory was not significantly different (p=0.678). The details are<br />

mentioned below.<br />

NICRA<br />

Village<br />

Feedback on Weather Advisory<br />

Very Useful Useful Satisfactory Irrelevant<br />

Number % Number % Number % Number %<br />

Dropad 10 33.33 7 23.33 5 16.66 8 26.66<br />

Gadhi 9 30 7 23.33 8 26.66 6 20<br />

Gunghasa 10 33.33 10 33.33 7 23.33 3 10<br />

Bhelwa 8 26.66 9 30 8 26.66 5 16.66<br />

The chi-square statistic is 6.5983. The p-value is .678863. The result is not significant at p < .05.<br />

Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment<br />

750 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

NICRA<br />

Total<br />

Non<br />

NICRA<br />

Village<br />

37 30.83 33 27.49 28 23.32 22 18.33<br />

8 16 13 26 10 20 19 38<br />

The chi-square statistic is 4.3363. The p-value is .887921. The result is not significant at p < .05.<br />

In the non-NICRA village 38% stated that weather advisory service was irrelevant, 20%<br />

considered it satisfactory while 42% farmers accepted it as very useful or useful to them. This<br />

scenario was much better in NICRA villages in comparison to non-NICRA village (p=0.887).<br />

The management <strong>of</strong> weather and climate risks in agriculture has become an important issue<br />

due to climate change. Wise use <strong>of</strong> weather and climate information can help to make better<br />

policy, institutional and community decisions that reduce related risks and enhance<br />

opportunities, improve the efficient use <strong>of</strong> limited resources and increase crop, livestock and<br />

fisheries production (Chattopadhyay et al., 2021).<br />

Advisories related to agricultural knowledge, information and management practices from crop<br />

selection, field preparation to harvesting were under the agricultural advisory service which<br />

was found that 38.33% farmers considered it very useful while about 30% farmers found it<br />

useful. But 19.16% farmers stated it as satisfactory and 12.49% farmers found it irrelevant that<br />

needs to be addressed as a grey area and has to be worked on in a better way to outreach the<br />

maximum number <strong>of</strong> farmers on time. In the selected village the scenario was not significantly<br />

different (p=0.716). The details are as follows:<br />

NICRA<br />

Village<br />

Feedback on Agricultural Advisory service<br />

Very Useful Useful Satisfactory Irrelevant<br />

Number % Number % Number % Number %<br />

Dropad 11 36.66 7 23.33 7 23.33 5 16.66<br />

Gadhi 10 33.33 8 26.66 9 30 3 10<br />

Gunghasa 13 43.33 10 33.33 4 13.33 3 10<br />

Bhelwa 12 40 11 36.66 3 10 4 13.33<br />

The chi-square statistic is 6.2357. The p-value is .716111. The result is not significant at p < .05.<br />

NICRATotal 46 38.33 36 29.99 23 19.16 15 12.49<br />

Non NICRA<br />

Village<br />

9 18 14 28 6 12 21 42<br />

The chi-square statistic is 20.1251. The p-value is .00016. The result is significant at p < .05.<br />

Conclusion<br />

Since, climate change has now become the reality, severely affecting the agricultural<br />

production and productivities directly or indirectly, Agro-meteorological Advisory Service<br />

(AAS) played a vital role to aware the farmer and improving their knowledge in adopting<br />

751 | Page Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

different management practices as per the weather conditions Agro-met Advisory Service was<br />

significantly higher in NICRA villages than non-NICRA village. The coordination among<br />

various sectors like District Agriculture Office, ATMA, Agriculture Extension Functionaries,<br />

District Administration, NGOs, FPOs, GVT-Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Godda etc. needed to be<br />

more strengthened to mitigate the impact <strong>of</strong> climate change on agriculture and allied activities<br />

by popularizing the AAS among farmers for adopting and timely following Agro-met Advisory<br />

Service (AAS).<br />

References<br />

Baethgen, Walter E.; Holger, Meinke and Agustin Gimenez (2003). Adaptation <strong>of</strong> agricultural<br />

production systems to climate variability and climate change: lessons learned and<br />

proposed research approach. In Climate Adaptation. net conference Insights and Tools<br />

for Adaptation: Learning from Climate Variability, pp. 18-20.<br />

Chattopadhyay N. (2021). Weather and climate-based farm advisory services. J.<br />

Agrometeorology, 23 (1) : 1-2.<br />

Gandhi, Gurupreet, Singh J, Chaudhary L and Kamlesh Kumar Sahu (2018). Farmers feedback<br />

about the agromet advisory services (AAS) at Mahasamund district <strong>of</strong> Chattisgarh. J.<br />

Pharma. and Phyto., 5 : 2522-2524.<br />

Lenka Sasank, Panigrahi, R. S., Satpathy, Abhijeet (2022). Farmers opinion on the usefulness<br />

<strong>of</strong> agro advisory services in the NICRA operated districts <strong>of</strong> Odisha. Indian Res. J. Ext.<br />

Edu., pp. 64-67.<br />

T5-23P-1194<br />

Use <strong>of</strong> UNEP Aridity Index for Drought Assessment in Bundelkhand<br />

Sunil Kumar<br />

Bihar Agricultural University, Sabour, Bhagalpur-813210, Bihar, India<br />

Drought is a natural phenomenon that results from a deficiency <strong>of</strong> rainfall from expected<br />

rainfall or normal rainfall and which may exist over a season or for longer period and is<br />

insufficient to satisfy the need for water for human activities and the environment.<br />

Bundelkhand region has faced a no. <strong>of</strong> times drought which has made the life <strong>of</strong> the people<br />

worst. A number <strong>of</strong> the widely used drought indices include Palmer Drought Severity Index<br />

(PDSI), Standardized Precipitation Index (SPI), Crop Moisture Index (CMI), UNEP Aridity<br />

Index and Surface water system Index (SWSI). In this study, UNEP Aridity index was used to<br />

monitor drought in Bundelkhand region.<br />

Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment<br />

752 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Methodology<br />

The Bundelkhand region consists <strong>of</strong> thirteen districts: seven in Uttar Pradesh- Jhansi, Jalaun,<br />

Lalitpur, Hamirpur, Mahoba, Banda and Chitrakoot, and six in Madhya Pradesh - Datia,<br />

Tikamgarh, Chattarpur, Damoh, Sagar and Panna. This is situated just below the Indo-Gangetic<br />

plain and is extending to the north with the undulating Vindhyan range spread across the<br />

northwest to the south. It is situated between 23°20’ and 26°20’ N latitude and 78°20’ and<br />

81°40’ E longitude. The daily gridded data (maximum temperature, minimum temperature,<br />

mean temperature and rainfall) for the duration <strong>of</strong> 1990 to 2019 were obtained from India<br />

Meteorological Department, Pune, India. Aridity index (AI) based on UNEP (1992) to quantify<br />

the drought occurrence at each study location was used. This index was derived from two<br />

important climatic elements for agriculture and reflects both the atmospheric supply (rainfall)<br />

and atmospheric demand (evapotranspiration), i.e. two important factors affecting the water<br />

budget <strong>of</strong> the land surface. The reference evapotranspiration (ETo) was calculated by using<br />

temperature method given by Hargreaves and Samani (1985) and modified by Hargreaves et<br />

al., (1985). As per the UNCCD definition, area which are sensitive to drought are<br />

<strong>of</strong>ten divided into three categories, namely arid, semi-arid, dry sub-humid. If this index is less<br />

than 0.5 then dry condition occurs in the area. Drought occurrences were examined based on<br />

the frequencies <strong>of</strong> events for every drought category for all 13 districts coming under this<br />

region. The percentage <strong>of</strong> drought occurrence was obtained by taking the ratio <strong>of</strong> drought<br />

occurrences to the total drought occurrences for a particular time and particular drought<br />

category as given by Sonmez et al., 2005. The drought occurrence probabilities were calculated<br />

by using each drought event for all stations in each district in Bundelkhand region.<br />

Results<br />

In Banda district Chhatarpur and Chitrakoot districts, in most <strong>of</strong> the years in June, October and<br />

in whole season, there was dry condition. In Chitrakoot district, there was more severe<br />

condition and cases <strong>of</strong> hyper arid and arid condition were also more in comparison to these<br />

other two districts. In the districts, Damoh, Datia and Hamirpur, Hamirpur was more affected<br />

by dry conditions and there were more cases <strong>of</strong> hyper arid condition. In Datia also there were<br />

more cases <strong>of</strong> dry condition but arid condition was more prevailing than hyper arid and no. <strong>of</strong><br />

cases were lesser than Datia. In Jalaun, Jhansi and Lalitpur, all the districts were affected by<br />

dry condition mostly in June and October months. But in the whole season, the condition was<br />

little bit better than individual months. In Jhansi district, dry condition was in more no. <strong>of</strong> years<br />

in comparison to other two districts. In Mahoba, Panna and Sagar, Mahoba was more affected<br />

than other two districts. Hyper arid to arid condition was more in June and October months in<br />

comparison to other three months. In season, there was some dry condition but the condition<br />

was better.<br />

753 | Page Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

In Tikamgarh, hyper arid condition was more in no. in October followed by June month. Arid<br />

condition was also more in these months in comparison to other three months. Among all 13<br />

districts, Datia and Jhansi were more affected and aridity index was very less in June and<br />

October months in comparison to other 11 districts. The monthly and seasonal aridity indices<br />

showed the variability <strong>of</strong> rainfall and its adverse effects that could be seen in the form <strong>of</strong> crop<br />

failures. The highest probability <strong>of</strong> occurrence for Hyper arid (9.33%) was found in Datia<br />

district whereas the probability for Hyper arid (8.00 %) in Jhansi district was found less than<br />

that <strong>of</strong> Datia. The highest percentage for arid category was observed at Datia district again as<br />

14.00 %, while Jhansi district had 12.00 % for arid category. The highest percentage <strong>of</strong><br />

occurrence probability <strong>of</strong> Semi-arid category was detected as 22.67 % at Jalaun and Tikamgarh<br />

districts followed by Chhatarpur district as 22.00 %. In Banda district, Hyper-arid class<br />

contributed only 9.0 % <strong>of</strong> the cases, the arid class contributed 16.0 % and the semi-arid<br />

conditions recurred 27.0 % times out <strong>of</strong> the total number <strong>of</strong> cases. Hyper-arid class contributed<br />

only 8.0 % <strong>of</strong> the cases, the arid class contributed 10.0 % and the semi-arid conditions occurred<br />

33.0 % times out <strong>of</strong> the total number <strong>of</strong> months in Chhatarpur district.<br />

In case <strong>of</strong> Chitrakoot district, Hyper-arid class contributed only 11.0 % <strong>of</strong> the cases, the arid<br />

class contributed 14.0 % and the semi-arid conditions recurred 25.0 % times out <strong>of</strong> the total<br />

number <strong>of</strong> months. Hyper-arid class contributed only 6.0 % <strong>of</strong> the cases, the arid class<br />

contributed 10.0 % and the semi-arid conditions occurred 25.0 % times out <strong>of</strong> the total number<br />

<strong>of</strong> months in Damoh district. In Datia district, Hyper-arid class contributed only 14.0 % <strong>of</strong> the<br />

cases, the arid class contributed 21.0 % and the semi-arid conditions occurred 26.0 % times out<br />

<strong>of</strong> the total number <strong>of</strong> months. Hyper-arid class contributed only 9.0 % <strong>of</strong> the cases, the arid<br />

class contributed 14.0 % and the semi-arid conditions occurred 32.0 % times out <strong>of</strong> the total<br />

number <strong>of</strong> months in case <strong>of</strong> Hamirpur. In Jalaun district, Hyper-arid class contributed only<br />

11.0 % <strong>of</strong> the cases, the arid class contributed14.0 % and the semi-arid conditions occurred<br />

34.0 % times out <strong>of</strong> the total number <strong>of</strong> months. In Jhansi district, Hyper-arid class contributed<br />

only 12.0 % <strong>of</strong> the cases, the arid class contributed 18.0 % and the semi-arid conditions<br />

occurred 29.0 % times out <strong>of</strong> the total number <strong>of</strong> cases. Hyper-arid class contributed only 11.0<br />

% <strong>of</strong> the cases, the arid class contributed 15.0 % and the semi-arid conditions occurred 28.0 %<br />

times out <strong>of</strong> the total number <strong>of</strong> cases in Lalitpur district. In Mahoba district, Hyper-arid class<br />

contributed only 10.0 % <strong>of</strong> the cases, the arid class contributed 15.0 % and the semi-arid<br />

conditions occurred 29.0 % times out <strong>of</strong> the total number <strong>of</strong> months. Hyper-arid class<br />

contributed only 6.0 %o% <strong>of</strong> the cases, the arid class contributed 15.0 % and the semi-arid<br />

conditions occurred 25.0 % times out <strong>of</strong> the total number <strong>of</strong> months Panna district. In Sagar<br />

district, Hyper-arid class contributed only 9.0 % <strong>of</strong> the cases, the arid class contributed 9.0 %<br />

and the semi-arid conditions occurred 25.0 % times out <strong>of</strong> the total number <strong>of</strong> months. In<br />

Tikamgarh district, Hyper-arid class contributed only 9.0 %% <strong>of</strong> the cases, the arid class<br />

contributed 11.0 % and the semi-arid conditions occurred 34.0 % times out <strong>of</strong> the total number<br />

Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment<br />

754 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

<strong>of</strong> months. Vulnerability <strong>of</strong> crops in different districts due to drought may be assessed by using<br />

this index. These results obtained from the study can be used in future to improve the situation<br />

for the Bundelkhand region and it can be utilized for proper planning by Government and<br />

planners for long time to secure the crop yield and to reduce the cost on resources.<br />

References<br />

Hargreaves G.H and Samani Z.A. 1985. Reference crop evapotranspiration from temperature.<br />

Appl. Eng. Agric. 1 (2):96–99.<br />

Hargreaves G. L, Hargreaves G. H and Riley, J.P. 1985. Agricultural benefits for Senegal River<br />

basin. J. Irrig. Drain. ASCE, 111:113–124.<br />

Sonmez F.K, Komuscu A.U, Erkan A and Turgu E. 2005. An analysis <strong>of</strong> spatial and temporal<br />

dimension <strong>of</strong> drought vulnerability in Turkey using the standardized precipitation<br />

index. Nat. Hazards, 35(2): 243-264.<br />

T5-24P-1195<br />

FarmPrecise – An Agromet Advisory Service (AAS) for Sustainable<br />

Agriculture and Resilient Farm Income: An Impact Assessment <strong>of</strong> AAS in<br />

Ahmednagar, Dhule, and Jalna Districts <strong>of</strong> Maharashtra<br />

Nikhil Nikam, Nitin Kumbhar and Ajay Shelke<br />

Watershed Organisation Trust<br />

nikhil.nikam@wotr.org.in, nitin.kumbhar@wotr.org.in, ajay.shelke@wotr.org.in<br />

Earlier, farmers could predict the arrival <strong>of</strong> monsoons based on their past experiences; now,<br />

changing climate makes it challenging to form predictions based on experiences alone.<br />

Therefore, adopting technological innovations is one <strong>of</strong> the most promising ways to adapt to<br />

climate change. Agromet Advisory Services (AAS) are crucial for agricultural planning and<br />

adaptation responses. In December 2017, a baseline study was conducted in 36 villages <strong>of</strong><br />

Ahmednagar, Jalna, and Dhule districts <strong>of</strong> Maharashtra State to understand the status <strong>of</strong><br />

existing agricultural practices and the effectiveness <strong>of</strong> AAS on agriculture. Based on the<br />

responses received from 360 households reported that the advisories were not reaching farmers<br />

on time when they needed, and some were not relevant for these villages. However, farmers<br />

found that the AAS was helpful to them to a limited extent. The study indicated that AAS<br />

requires better distribution channels, accuracy, timely forecasts, extreme weather alert, and<br />

customized crop and local-specific advisories. The insights from the study helped to structure<br />

the features for the FarmPrecise mobile application.<br />

Ever since the launch <strong>of</strong> the FarmPrecise application, there has been an increase in users (50k<br />

plus downloads on google play store), whereby we assumed that the application is helping<br />

755 | Page Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

farmers in some way. Therefore, in December 2021, a mid-term impact study was conducted<br />

with the same respondents to validate the hypothesis. The study was designed with specific<br />

objectives to understand and examine i) use and reach <strong>of</strong> FarmPrecise application along with<br />

other digital technologies, ii) changes in agricultural productivity, iii) changes in the cultivation<br />

costs, iv) Comparison between FarmPrecise users and business-as-usual farmers for changes<br />

in crop productivity, v) changes between FarmPrecise users and business-as-usual farmers for<br />

crop losses due to extreme weather events.<br />

The findings showed that the crop productivity <strong>of</strong> major crops <strong>of</strong> FarmPrecise users was higher<br />

than that <strong>of</strong> the business-as-usual farmers. In addition, a few FarmPrecise users reported that<br />

they avoided crop loss due to receiving advanced extreme weather alerts through the mobile<br />

application. Moreover, the average household income from agricultural sources has also<br />

increased compared to the baseline scenario. The real-time weather information, updated<br />

market rates, agriculture news, crop-specific weather-based advisories, farm diary, and<br />

community forum are some <strong>of</strong> the prominent features <strong>of</strong> the FarmPrecise application farmers<br />

use to become aware and cope with climate extremes events.<br />

T5-25P-1219<br />

Assessment <strong>of</strong> Biophysical Parameters and Disease Incidence in Mungbean<br />

Using Hyperspectral Radiometry<br />

M. Prabhakar*, K. A. Gopinath, N. Ravi Kumar, U. Sai Sravan, M. Thirupathi, G.<br />

Sravan Kumar, P. Likhita, S. Madhu Naga Sekhar Reddy and R. Naresh<br />

ICAR-Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, Hyderabad – 500 059, Telangana, India<br />

*m.prabhakar@icar.gov.in<br />

Mung bean (Vigna radiata L.) is an important pulse in India and is <strong>of</strong>ten experiencing biotic<br />

stress in the rainy season. Cercospora Leaf Spot (CLS) is an important fungal disease <strong>of</strong> mung<br />

bean, making its cultivation difficult and causing sizable loss to the production up to 60%<br />

(Bharti et al., 2017). CLS has been found to appear in the epiphytotic form causing enormous<br />

loss to the farmers (Vijaya Bhaskar, 2020). Timely management will help in preventing the<br />

spread <strong>of</strong> disease. Radiometry <strong>of</strong>fer scope to detect biotic and abiotic stress (Prabhakar et al.,<br />

2013). The spectral features vary noticeably between healthy and infested plants depending on<br />

the extent <strong>of</strong> damage. Therefore, present study was carried out with an objective to find out the<br />

impact <strong>of</strong> CLS on biophysical parameters in mungbean using spectral features extraction.<br />

Methodology<br />

A field experiment was carried out in 2018 rainy (kKharif) season at Gungal Research Farm,<br />

ICAR-Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, Hyderabad. The experiment was laid<br />

out in randomized block design with eight nutrient management treatments viz., T 1:<br />

Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment<br />

756 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Unamended control; T2: 100% RDF; T3: 75% RDF + 20 kg S ha -1 ; T4: 100% RDF + 20 kg S<br />

ha -1 ; T 5: 75% RDF + 30 kg S ha -1 ; T 6: 100% RDF + 30 kg S ha -1 ; T 7: 75% RDF + 40 kg S ha -<br />

1 ; T 8: 100% RDF + 40 kg S ha -1 , replicated thrice. The crop was sown in 4.2 × 3.0 m 2 plots by<br />

adopting a seed rate <strong>of</strong> 20 kg ha -1 and 30 cm row to row spacing. The RDF used was 20-40-0<br />

kg NPK ha -1 and the entire quantity <strong>of</strong> fertilizers (NPK) were applied as basal before sowing.<br />

The disease incidence (CLS) was observed at the time <strong>of</strong> flowering. Based on visual symptoms<br />

<strong>of</strong> damage, CLS infestation levels were categorized into four grades <strong>of</strong> severity viz. grade 1<br />

(healthy), grade 2 (low), grade 3 (medium) and grade 4 (severe). The biophysical parameters<br />

(biomass, SPAD value and seed yield) were recorded under different severity grades. Canopy<br />

reflectance data from mungbean (15 plants per each grade) were recorded with FieldSpec 3 Hi-<br />

Res spectroradiometer (ASD 1999; spectral range: 350-2500 nm).<br />

Results<br />

The biophysical parameters <strong>of</strong> mungbean infested with CLS varied significantly under different<br />

severity grades As mentioned in the table. With the increase in CLS incidence, the SPAD value<br />

decreased by 22.9%. Fresh and dry biomass also varied significantly with CLS, however, the<br />

trends were not consistent. The fresh and dry biomass <strong>of</strong> mungbean under severely infested<br />

CLS was reduced by 30.1% and 38.5% compared to healthy plants. With increase in the<br />

severity <strong>of</strong> CLS infestation the yield had declined significantly. The maximum yield loss was<br />

observed in severely infested crop followed by medium CLS infestation compared to healthy<br />

plants. The seed yield was reduced in infested plants by 38.1% (across three grades) compared<br />

to healthy.<br />

SPAD value, biomass and seed yield <strong>of</strong> mungbean under different grades <strong>of</strong> CLS<br />

infestation<br />

Severity Grade<br />

SPAD value<br />

Fresh biomass<br />

(g plant -1 )<br />

Dry biomass<br />

(g plant -1 )<br />

Seed yield<br />

(g plant -1 )<br />

Healthy 52.40 ± 5.69 a 42.42 ± 7.77 a 8.57 ± 2.11 a 2.02 ± 0.18 a<br />

Low 45.10 ± 1.35 b 38.25 ± 8.93 a 7.66 ± 1.29 ab 1.49 ± 0.25 b<br />

Medium 45.10 ± 1.35 b 35.93 ± 5.91 ab 6.84 ± 1.54 b 1.31 ± 0.15 c<br />

Severe 40.37 ± 0.94 c 29.64 ± 7.59 b 5.27 ± 1.65 c 0.96 ± 0.10 d<br />

Values are Mean ± SD, different superscript letters denote significant difference (p < 0.05)<br />

Mean canopy reflectance <strong>of</strong> different CLS severity grades from the field based hyperspectral<br />

radiometry studies showed a distinct difference between healthy and infested plants in the<br />

figure at different levels <strong>of</strong> infestation as described in the figure. Reflectance from the CLS<br />

infested plants compared to healthy was high in visible region (400-750 nm) and was lower in<br />

near infra-red region (750-1100 nm). Healthy plants have higher reflectance in NIR region and<br />

low reflectance in the visible region.<br />

757 | Page Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Ground-based Hyperspectral reflectance spectra under different severity grades <strong>of</strong> CLS in mungbean<br />

Conclusion<br />

Results <strong>of</strong> this study confirmed that CLS infestation significantly reduced the chlorophyll,<br />

biomass and seed yield in mungbean. The variations in spectral reflectance <strong>of</strong>fer scope to detect<br />

the CLS disease severity and associated loss in yield.<br />

References<br />

Bharti M, Chandra R, Kumar A, Kumar R, Yadav and Yadav P. (2017). Enzymatic response<br />

<strong>of</strong> mungbean (Vigna radiata) genotypes against Cercospora leaf spot disease. Indian J.<br />

Agric. Sci. 87: 930-933.<br />

Prabhakar M, Prasa Y. G. Desai S, Thirupathi M. 2013. Spectral and spatial properties <strong>of</strong> rice<br />

brown plant hopper and groundnut late leaf spot disease infestation under field<br />

conditions. J. Agrometeorol. 15:57‒62.<br />

Vijaya Bhaskar A. 2020. New sources <strong>of</strong> genotypes against leaf spot and powdery mildew<br />

diseases in Greengram. J. pharmacogn. phytochem. 9(5): 455-460.<br />

Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment<br />

758 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

T5-25P-1296<br />

Non-Destructive and Rapid Estimation <strong>of</strong> the Foliar Nitrogen <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Tomato Plant by Proximal Hyperspectral Remote Sensing Pl. Biochemical<br />

Properties: Nitrogen<br />

Md. Zafar, B. U. Choudhury*, H. Das, R, Narzari, and V. K. Mishra<br />

ICAR Research Complex for NEH Region, Umiam, Meghalaya- 793103<br />

* burhan3i@yahoo.com<br />

Dynamic fertilizer management is a means <strong>of</strong> making soil nutrients available for plant<br />

development, according to their needs, which is the main aim <strong>of</strong> precision agriculture. Soil<br />

nitrogen (N) is one <strong>of</strong> the most important essential nutrients for optimal crop growth and<br />

yield. It is a key component <strong>of</strong> enzymes, vitamins, chlorophyll and other cellular components,<br />

all <strong>of</strong> which are critical to crop growth and development. It is therefore one <strong>of</strong> the most<br />

important essential nutrients to optimize crop yields, including tomato plants. Too much<br />

nitrogen can reduce yields while the nitrogen deficit relative to the plant uptake requirement<br />

has also stunted the plant vegetative growth and reduces yields. The destructive measure for<br />

periodic monitoring <strong>of</strong> the nutritional state <strong>of</strong> plants in this situation is not a logical option. The<br />

traditional destructive method is time-consuming, error-prone, competence-oriented, and<br />

requires a well-equipped laboratory for measurements. This makes it difficult to remediate in<br />

real time, including fertilizing based on laboratory measurements. However, with advances in<br />

hyperspectral proximal remote sensing technology, plant N estimation can be conducted<br />

quickly and non-destructively while being economic and repetitive in monitoring.<br />

Spectroscopy techniques are a technology that requires the acquisition <strong>of</strong> data in spectral bands<br />

and based on the most sensitive bands, a predictive model can be developed to predict nitrogen<br />

as well as other plant biochemical properties.<br />

In this study, we have attempted to develop a non-destructive hyperspectral proximal remote<br />

sensing-based estimation method for predicting the N concentration <strong>of</strong> standing tomato<br />

plants. For this, we used multiple and multi-date foliar spectral reflectance measurements from<br />

an ASD 2 handheld Spectroradiometer and correlated with destructive lab measurements on<br />

multiple occasions. Finally, a predictive model was developed for the estimation <strong>of</strong> foliar<br />

nitrogen concentrations <strong>of</strong> tomato plants in the field based on the periodically measured<br />

reflectance and the concentration <strong>of</strong> foliar nitrogen in the laboratory while using Advanced<br />

Machine Learning Techniques (e.g. Random forest, Support vector machine, Ridge<br />

regression) in addition to Multi-linear regression.<br />

759 | Page Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Methodology<br />

In the present study, tomato as a test crop was grown under stress-free outdoor conditions at<br />

the ICAR Research Complex for NEH, Umiam, Meghalaya. Periodic measurements <strong>of</strong> the<br />

spectral reflectance <strong>of</strong> standing tomato culture were taken in increments <strong>of</strong> 325 to 1075 nm by<br />

handheld field Spectroradiometer (ASD Handheld 2) and correlated with the concentration <strong>of</strong><br />

N measured in the lab (Jackson, 1973). The reflectance data measured periodically were<br />

processed using the SG filter (Savitzky and Golay 1964) to obtain both smoothed and<br />

normalized spectra. To select the variables (grouping and predictor), the correlation coefficient<br />

and stage discrimination analysis (SDA) were performed on a large data set to identify sensitive<br />

wavelength regions). Sensitive wavelength zones were identified as visible (401-702nm) and<br />

NIR (702-1020nm). Follow the multiple linear regression (MLR) model and three machine<br />

learning algorithms such as Random Forest (RF), Ridge regression (RR), Support vector<br />

machine (SVM) regression also being performed while selecting the satisfactory prediction<br />

model based on R-square and RMSE values.<br />

Results<br />

Reflectance in visible and NIR areas has been shown to be sensitive to nitrogen<br />

concentration from tomato growth. Plant N concentration was best predicted using reflectance<br />

in the visible (401-702 nm) region, more specifically wave bands at 550nm and 678 nm in<br />

the visible region. The smoothed spectra yielded satisfactory results with Random Forest<br />

Regression (R 2 = 0.91; RMSE: 0.072) in comparison with SVM, MLR and Ridge Regression.<br />

Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment<br />

760 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Conclusion<br />

Tomato plant and the spectral reflectance curve (Smoothened at Vis-NIR)<br />

Monitoring nitrogen levels in plants help in periodic remedial actions for optimum plant<br />

growth. The predictive model equation developed using machine learning algorithms and<br />

progressive discrimination analysis (SDA) in this study could be helpful in estimating tomato<br />

leaf nitrogen concentrations quickly and non-destructive. Therefore, we can substitute<br />

carefully (with repeated validation on large datasets) the traditional destructive laboratory<br />

method, known for the variety <strong>of</strong> accuracy based on the time and skills.<br />

Predictive models for estimating leaf nitrogen using tomato crop spectral reflectance (R<br />

= reflectance)<br />

Discriminated<br />

Sensitive<br />

Spectral<br />

region<br />

(nm)<br />

Sensitive<br />

bands<br />

(nm)<br />

Most<br />

Sensitive<br />

band(nm)<br />

Model<br />

Predictive Model<br />

Smooth 410 – 1020<br />

550, 678,<br />

Y =<br />

678 RF<br />

853, 972<br />

0.203+90.24*R678<br />

Smooth 410 – 1020<br />

550, 678,<br />

Y =<br />

678 SVM<br />

853, 972<br />

0.696+81.96*R678<br />

Smooth 410 – 1020<br />

550, 678,<br />

Y =<br />

678 RR<br />

853, 972<br />

0.653+82.95*R678<br />

Smooth 410 – 1020<br />

550, 678,<br />

Y =<br />

678 MLR<br />

853, 972<br />

0.753+81.45*R 678<br />

*RF: Random Forest, SVM: Support vector machine, RR: Ridge regression, MLR: multilinear<br />

regression<br />

References<br />

Kharat R. B, and Deshmukh D. R. R. 2016. Analysis <strong>of</strong> Effective Leaf Nitrogen Concentrations<br />

in Tomato Plant using Vegetation Indices. Int. J. Eng. Sci. Comp, 18(2), 2397-2400.<br />

761 | Page Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Ito H and Morimoto S. Non-destructive determination <strong>of</strong> lycopene in tomatoes using<br />

visible/near-infrared spectroscopy. Journal <strong>of</strong> the Illuminating Engineering Institute <strong>of</strong><br />

Japan, 2009, 93, 510-513.<br />

Pourdarbani R, Sabzi S, Rohban M. H, García-Mateos G and Arriba J. I. 2021. Non-destructive<br />

nitrogen content estimation in tomato plant leaves by Vis-NIR hyperspectral imaging<br />

and regression data models. Applied Optics, 60(30): 9560-9569.<br />

ASD Inc. 2010. FieldSpec® HandHeld 2 Spectroradiometer User Manual.<br />

T5-27P-1332<br />

Assessment <strong>of</strong> Soil Fertility Constraints in Shrirampura Micro-Watershed,<br />

Turuvekere Taluk, Tumkur District, Karnataka Using Geospatial<br />

Techniques<br />

K. T. Aruna, B. G. Vasanthi, B. Mamatha and A. Sathish<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Agricultural Sciences, GKVK, Bangalore<br />

The study was conducted in Shrirampura micro-watershed, Turuvekere tauk, Tumkur district<br />

under southern dry zone <strong>of</strong> Karnataka, Agro ecological sub region 8.2 (AESR 8.2) to assess<br />

the soil fertility constraints using geospatial techniques. The world view-2 and LISS-IV merged<br />

satellite data at the scale <strong>of</strong> 1:7920 were used in conjunction with the cadastral map as a base<br />

for detailed survey. A total <strong>of</strong> 54 geo-referenced representative surface soil samples (0–20 cm)<br />

were collected at 320 m 2 grid interval from different land use and land forms with a microwatershed<br />

area <strong>of</strong> 537 ha. Soil samples were analyzed for pH, EC, organic carbon, available<br />

nitrogen, available phosphorus, available potassium and micronutrients (Fe, Mn, Cu, and Zn).<br />

The spatial distribution maps were developed by using krigging method. Major portion <strong>of</strong> the<br />

watershed area was showed that, the soils were neutral to (44.6 %) to slightly alkaline (45.9 %)<br />

and non-saline in nature. The organic carbon (OC) status ranged from low (72 %) to medium<br />

(21 %) and the entire micro watershed area was found to be low in available nitrogen (N)<br />

content. The soil available phosphorus (P) was low (39.7 %) to medium (53.3 %), available<br />

potassium (K) was medium (70.2 %) to high (18.8 %) and available sulphur (S) in medium<br />

category. Regarding available micronutrients, copper (Cu), iron (Fe) and manganese (Mn) were<br />

sufficient in range and zinc (Zn) was found to be deficient (58.9 %) to sufficient (34.1 %) in<br />

the study area. The developed thematic maps by using geospatial techniques in the study area<br />

identified that OC, N, P and Zn were important soil fertility constraints indicating their<br />

immediate attention to achieve sustainable productivity. The generated information can help<br />

the researchers, farmers and planners to manage the natural resources for future planning.<br />

Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment<br />

762 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

T5-28P-1333<br />

Assessing Impact <strong>of</strong> Dry Spells on Sorghum Productivity over Telangana<br />

State<br />

Santanu Kumar Bal*, N. Manikandan, A.V.M. Subba Rao, M.A. Sarath Chandran<br />

and Fawaz Parapurath<br />

ICAR-Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, Hyderabad – 500059 India<br />

* santanu.bal@icar.gov.in<br />

Rainfed agriculture is practiced over India in 67% <strong>of</strong> net sown area. The livelihood <strong>of</strong> 40%<br />

population <strong>of</strong> the country is supported and 44% <strong>of</strong> food grain production in India is met by this<br />

ecosystem. Rainfall during southwest monsoon period is very crucial for kharif season crops<br />

and the yearly rainfall variation during this season have pr<strong>of</strong>ound impact on the rainfed crop<br />

production. The yield <strong>of</strong> rainfed crops is mainly determined by the distribution <strong>of</strong> southwest<br />

monsoon rainfall or occurrence <strong>of</strong> dry spells during the crop growing period. Sorghum is one<br />

<strong>of</strong> the important rainfed food grain crops and cultivated over 1.19 lakhs ha. in Telangana state<br />

(AAP, 2021). The dry spell is a period where the weather has been dry, for an abnormally long<br />

time, shorter but not as severe as a drought (Wilhite and Glantz, 1985). The frequency <strong>of</strong> dry<br />

spells is <strong>of</strong>ten used as a potential indicator <strong>of</strong> moisture stress conditions, in the management <strong>of</strong><br />

water resource systems, particularly for agriculture (Gocic and Trajkovic, 2013). In this<br />

context, an attempt has been made to develop Dry Spell Index (DSI), to quantify the frequency<br />

and duration <strong>of</strong> dry spells during kharif (June-Sep) season over Telangana state at district level.<br />

Trend in DSI and effect <strong>of</strong> dry spell on sorghum productivity in different districts <strong>of</strong> Telangana<br />

state was also carried out.<br />

Methodology<br />

The district level daily rainfall data for the period 1991-2020 was used in this study to compute<br />

the DSI. The value <strong>of</strong> the dry spell was worked out as the number <strong>of</strong> dry days divided by 7. For<br />

example, the weightage value <strong>of</strong> a dry spell with 7-days duration will be 1.0, 10-days will be<br />

1.43, 14-days will be 2.0 and 21-days will be 3.0 and so on. Later, values <strong>of</strong> all dry spells during<br />

SWM were cumulated and the Dry Spell Index (DSI) was arrived for that season (Bal et al.<br />

2022). The value <strong>of</strong> DSI is directly proportional to the increase in the number and duration <strong>of</strong><br />

dry spells within the season. An algorithm in Fortran program was developed to work out the<br />

DSI for each year for each district in the study area during the period 1991–2020.<br />

The district-wise crop area and productivity <strong>of</strong> sorghum for the period 1997–2016 was<br />

collected from web portal <strong>of</strong> Ministry <strong>of</strong> Agriculture and Farmers Welfare, Government <strong>of</strong><br />

India (http://www.aps.dac.gov.in). Major sorghum growing districts in Telangana state were<br />

selected on the basis <strong>of</strong> average crop growing area <strong>of</strong> sorghum with ≥ 500 ha. The time series<br />

yield data was de-trended using linear regression method (Gommes and Hoefsloot, 2006) for<br />

763 | Page Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

obtaining stationary yield data. Mann Kendall test, a non-parametric test was employed to find<br />

the trend in DSI and the significance in the trend was detected by two-tailed test at 95%<br />

probability levels. Pearson’s correlation coefficients <strong>of</strong> de-trended sorghum yield with DSI<br />

were worked out for all selected districts <strong>of</strong> Telangana.<br />

Results<br />

The DSI value ranged between 3.6 and 8.2 in different districts <strong>of</strong> Telangana state. The spatial<br />

distribution <strong>of</strong> average DSI over the period 1991–2020 across the districts indicate that, it was<br />

highest (8.2) in Jogulamba Gadwal district followed by Nalgonda (8.10) and Hyderabad (8.01)<br />

while the lowest DSI was observed in Bhadradri Kothagudam (3.6) followed by J. Bhupalpally<br />

(3.9), Mancherial and Komaram Bheem (4.0) (Fig. 1a). Mann-Kendall trend analysis showed<br />

that the DSI is declining in all the districts <strong>of</strong> Telangana. However, significant decreasing trend<br />

(at 5% level) was noticed in Adilabad, Hyderabad, Kamareddy, Karimnagar, Khammam,<br />

Nizamabad, Siddipet, Suryapet and Yadagiri Bhuvagiri districts (Fig. 1b). This indicate that<br />

the occurrence <strong>of</strong> dry spells and its duration has reduced during the study period. The Pearson<br />

correlation analysis indicate that around 41 per cent area under sorghum in Telangana state is<br />

having significant negative correlation with DSI.<br />

Conclusion<br />

In the present study Dry Spell Index was computed to find the spatial distribution, trend and<br />

influence <strong>of</strong> dry spells during kharif (June-Sep) season on sorghum productivity over<br />

Telangana state at district level. Results indicate that, the highest (8.2) DSI was noticed in<br />

Jogulamba Gadwal district and the lowest DSI in Bhadradri Kothagudam (3.6) district.<br />

Significant decreasing trend (at 5% level) in DSI was noticed in Adilabad, Hyderabad,<br />

Kamareddy, Karimnagar, Khammam, Nizamabad, Siddipet, Suryapet and Yadagiri Bhuvagiri<br />

districts. Significant negative relationship was observed in 41 per cent sorghum growing area<br />

<strong>of</strong> Telangana district. Further study is required to find the dry spell occurrence with in the crop<br />

growing period or different phenological stages <strong>of</strong> the crop using DSI to assess the influence<br />

on crop yield.<br />

References<br />

AAP, 2021. Agriculture Action Plan 2020-21. Department <strong>of</strong> Agriculture, government <strong>of</strong><br />

Telangana, Hyderabad, 130p.<br />

Bal S., Sandeep V.M, Vijaya Kumar P, Subba Rao A.V.M., Pramod V.P, Manikandan N,<br />

Srinivasa Rao, Singh N.P. and Bhaskar S. (2022). Assessing impact <strong>of</strong> dry spells on<br />

the principal rainfed crops in major dryland regions <strong>of</strong> India. Agric. Meteorol., 313,<br />

108768 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2021.108768<br />

Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment<br />

764 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Gocic M and Trajkovic S. (2013). Analysis <strong>of</strong> changes in meteorological variables using<br />

Mann–194 Kendall and Sen’s slope estimator statistical tests in Serbia. Global<br />

Planetary Change, 100 (1): 172–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloplacha.2012.10.014<br />

Gommes and Hoefsloot (2006). Crop Monitoring Box documentation, Chapter 4.2. Analysis <strong>of</strong><br />

time series <strong>of</strong> climate and crops to identify trends. Detrending yield, http://www.<br />

https://www.hoefsloot.com/wiki/index.php?title=Chapter14<br />

Spatial distribution <strong>of</strong> DSI (a) and its trend (b) over Telangana State<br />

765 | Page Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

T5-29P-1345<br />

Investigations on Chopping-Cum-Tilling-Cum-Mixing Machine for Straw<br />

Incorporation<br />

Abhishek Patel * , Krishna Pratap Singh, Ajay Kumar Roul, Rohit Dilip Nalawade and<br />

Aman Mahore<br />

ICAR- Central Institute <strong>of</strong> Agricultural Engineering, Bhopal<br />

* abhishekpatel2910@gmail.com<br />

Ex situ and in situ management approaches are preferable methods for straw management. The<br />

developed chopping unit is an in-situ technology that consists <strong>of</strong> two vertical counter rotating<br />

shafts with four serrated blades each. This research is about the construction <strong>of</strong> a straw<br />

chopping cum incorporation unit that uses a rotary impact cutter to cut paddy straw and a rotary<br />

tiller to mix it. This mechanism is made up <strong>of</strong> two vertical shafts, each with two pairs <strong>of</strong> serrated<br />

blade flanges and a rotary tiller behind them. The statnding and loose paddy straw are cut with<br />

the chopping unit, and the pieces <strong>of</strong> straw are mixed into the soil with the rotary tiller. The<br />

machine was put to the test in a freshly harvested rice field, and its performance was compared<br />

to that <strong>of</strong> existing straw incorporation machines such the super seeder, mulcher integrated with<br />

rotavator, and rotavator solely with the designed CIAE chopping cum incorpoation unit. All <strong>of</strong><br />

the machines were evaluated on the basis <strong>of</strong> mixing index (MI), pulverisation index (PI) or<br />

mean weight diameter (MWD), and bulk density at 3 km/hr forward speed, 40% soil moisture<br />

and 17% straw moisture.<br />

The PI <strong>of</strong> the superseeder, mulcher integrated with rotavator, rotavator alone, and CIAE<br />

developed chopping cum incorporation unit were (9.03, 8.60, 10.20, and 8.42 mm), MI (85.18,<br />

91.18, 28.38, and 96.59%) and BD (1.365, 1.360, 1.390, and 1.32 g/cm 3 ), on the other hand.<br />

All <strong>of</strong> the combinations were subjected to a paired t test, which revealed significant differences<br />

between them. According to the results <strong>of</strong> the evaluation, the CIAE-developed machine<br />

outperformed all the equipment under study.<br />

Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment<br />

766 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

T5-30P-1350<br />

Hyperspectral Reflectance: A Promising Tool to Assess the Metabolic Responses to<br />

Drought Stress in Sugarcane<br />

Vinay Hegde 1,2* , Debasmita Mohanty 1 and Jagadish Rane 1<br />

1 ICAR National Institute <strong>of</strong> Abiotic Stress Management, Baramati, Maharashtra<br />

2 Dr Panjabrao Deshmukh Krishi Vidyapeeth, Akola, Maharashtra.<br />

* vinayhegde4189@gmail.com<br />

The deterioration <strong>of</strong> ecological balance and global climate anomalies have led to enhanced<br />

frequencies <strong>of</strong> water scarcity, and drought is emerged as a major impediment to the expansion<br />

<strong>of</strong> agricultural production. This emphasizes enhanced impetus to development <strong>of</strong> drought<br />

tolerant cultivars that can be climate smart. The approaches being currently followed are not<br />

sufficient to achieve this target though there have been significant advances in our<br />

understanding about the mechanisms <strong>of</strong> tolerance to soil moisture stress and possible<br />

application <strong>of</strong> genomics for genetic improvement <strong>of</strong> crops. In this context, the underlying<br />

bottleneck in understanding the manoeuvrable phenotypic responses are being addressed<br />

through phenomics. This advanced approach <strong>of</strong> characterizing plants depends on non-invasive<br />

techniques involving different sensors and automation, Hyperspectral sensors have great<br />

potential to reveal genetic variability in responses <strong>of</strong> crop plants to environmental stimuli<br />

including those due to drought. By integrating this technique in high-throughput field<br />

phenomics, hyperspectral signatures could be more effectively utilized to address the breeding<br />

challenges posed by global climate change. For breeding and management strategies to be<br />

beneficial in increasing water usage efficiency, it is essential to have deeper insights into<br />

drought impacts on crops at different scales starting from whole plant to cellular level. In order<br />

to develop a rapid and non-destructive substitute for conventional methods <strong>of</strong> evaluating plant<br />

traits related to drought response, we employed hyperspectral measurement technique for<br />

detection <strong>of</strong> proline, the key stress metabolite generated by plants during stress. We assessed<br />

spectral signatures in leaves <strong>of</strong> sugarcane seedling exposed to drought in a glasshouse. Leaf<br />

metabolite concentrations, as contrasted to physiological features, detected drought stress<br />

before it was perceptible to the naked eye with validation <strong>of</strong> R 2 value. The results <strong>of</strong> our<br />

experiments explain the efficacy <strong>of</strong> hyperspectral data to the detection <strong>of</strong> a proline in response<br />

to stress in plants. These scientific leads can be carried forward to design phenomics protocols<br />

for screening large number <strong>of</strong> genotypes <strong>of</strong> sugarcane for identification <strong>of</strong> relevant genes<br />

contributing to drought tolerance. These can also guide decision support systems to design<br />

precision agriculture.<br />

767 | Page Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

T5-31P-1373<br />

Photo-Voltaic Solar Power: Alternative Energy for Farm Mechanization<br />

Ravikant V. Adake*, I. Srinivas, B. Sanjeev Reddy, Ashish S. Dhimate, M Mallikarjun,<br />

K. Sammi Reddy and Vinod Kumar Singh<br />

ICAR- Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, Hyderabad-500059, India.<br />

* a.ravikant@icar.gov.in<br />

Sources <strong>of</strong> non-renewable energy are widely used for various agricultural operations in Indian<br />

agriculture. Pre-harvest operations are mainly dependent on tractor, self-propelled machines,<br />

diesel engines etc which need crude oil predominantly. Out <strong>of</strong> total diesel consumption in India,<br />

agricultural sector alone accounts for 13% (Nielsen 2013). Continuous and increased use <strong>of</strong><br />

non-renewable energy sources not only increase environmental pollution but also increases<br />

operational cost as cost <strong>of</strong> crude oil is increasing. From the past half-decade, the cost <strong>of</strong> crude<br />

oil increased by 60-70%. On the other hand, Indian agriculture is deficit <strong>of</strong> farm power<br />

availability to meet challenges <strong>of</strong> food grain production in coming years. Existing farm power<br />

availability need to be increased from 2.76 kW/ha to 4 kW/ha to cope up with the increasing<br />

demand <strong>of</strong> food grains by 2030 (ICAR Annual Report 2020-21).<br />

In this situation, solar energy is an alternative option to generate additional farm power on &<br />

<strong>of</strong>f the farm to reduce environmental pollution and minimize cost <strong>of</strong> cultivation. Solar energy<br />

is amply available in India. On an average, irradiance on horizontal surface in India is 5.6 kWh<br />

m -2 day -1 . In most parts <strong>of</strong> the country, solar power is being used for post-harvest operations<br />

(Srinivas et al., 2016), however, research & development (R&D) on solar powered farm<br />

machinery/implements for pre-harvest operations like tillage, sowing, weeding, sprayings are<br />

very few and most <strong>of</strong> them are either battery operated or on-the-go PV model. Solar powered<br />

weeder with 1-hp electric motor with rotary tiller and co-axial rotary mechanism was developed<br />

and tested for weeding (Adake et al., 2021). At ICAR-Central Research Institute for Dryland<br />

Agriculture (ICAR-CRIDA), Hyderabad experimental model <strong>of</strong> PV based solar power system<br />

was developed for various agricultural operations where solar power system is stationary. This<br />

paper highlights details <strong>of</strong> PV-based solar powered technology for farm mechanization and its<br />

scope in dryland agriculture<br />

Methodology<br />

Development <strong>of</strong> experimental model<br />

Experimental model <strong>of</strong> solar powered prime mover which consists <strong>of</strong> brush-less DC (BLDC)<br />

motor with 1.5 hp, motor controller (48 V; 20 amps), accelerator, maximum power tracking<br />

point (MPPT) device, and 3-hp solar PV Module was developed. Solar PV module and MPPT<br />

device are stationary and rest <strong>of</strong> the parts are movable. A suitable frame was developed to<br />

Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment<br />

768 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

mount 1.5-hp DC motor, motor controller, power transmission system, drive wheels, and hitch<br />

system to attach small operating tools like rotary weeder, blade harrow, cultivator, mini ridgers<br />

etc to make the prime mover for multiple operations. Power to 1.5 hp-motor is drawn from<br />

solar PV module through solar charge controller and motor controller. The output <strong>of</strong> MPPT<br />

device maintains the constant voltage at 55 V and supplies the current in the range <strong>of</strong> 8-18<br />

amps depending upon load exerts during operation. Prime mover is behind with travel speed in<br />

the range <strong>of</strong> 2-5 km/hr. Accelerator also facilitates reverse and forward motion. While<br />

operation 30-meter cable <strong>of</strong> 4 sq.mm was used to draw the power from solar system which<br />

covers approximately an area <strong>of</strong> 0.05 ha.<br />

Field testing<br />

Solar powered prime mover was tested for weeding and shallow tillage at research farm, ICAR-<br />

CRIDA, Hyderabad. Minimum solar irradiance <strong>of</strong> 4 kWh/m 2 /day is received in the month <strong>of</strong><br />

August and maximum <strong>of</strong> 6.6 kWh/m 2 /day is received between March-May with available<br />

sunshine days <strong>of</strong> 310 days. There is great potential to produce electricity by harnessing solar<br />

energy. For weeding, rotary tiller and blade harrow were used. For shallow tillage, blade<br />

harrow and mini ridger were used which are commercially available in local market. During<br />

operation, observations were made on power consumption by different implements and load<br />

exerted due to depth <strong>of</strong> operation.<br />

Results<br />

Preliminary trails were conducted, and performance was tested when solar radiation ranged<br />

between 4kWh/m 2 /day to 6.5 kW/m2/day. It was observed that the weeding tools could be<br />

successfully operated with 80-92% efficiency in kharif season (July-October) with current<br />

consumption within limit <strong>of</strong> design. The power consumption for weeding was similar<br />

irrespective <strong>of</strong> rotary tiller or blade harrow for a given depth <strong>of</strong> operation and width <strong>of</strong> cut. For<br />

shallow tillage the power consumption was higher than cultivator and need good solar<br />

radiation. With 1.5 hp design, 3-tyne cultivator could be operated successfully within limit <strong>of</strong><br />

power availability. Power consumption varied with depth <strong>of</strong> operation and field operations.<br />

Conclusion<br />

Solar powered prime mover <strong>of</strong> 1.5 hp could be viable in dryland agriculture depending upon<br />

availability <strong>of</strong> radiation in cropping season. However, electricity transportation within the field<br />

could be an issue which need to be resolved with appropriate management strategies. Such<br />

solar powered prime mover could be suitable for small farm holders.<br />

769 | Page Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

References<br />

Nielsen. 2013. All India study on sectoral demand <strong>of</strong> petrol and diesel, Petroleum Planning and<br />

Analysis Cell, Ministry <strong>of</strong> Petroleum & Natural Gas, Govt. <strong>of</strong> India.<br />

https://www.ppac.gov.in.<br />

Adake Ravikant V, Srinivas I, Ashish S Dhimate, Reddy B.S, Vijaykumar S and Sammi Reddy<br />

K. 2021. Development <strong>of</strong> solar powered weeder for small farmers in drylands. <strong>Extended</strong><br />

summary In 5th International Agronomy Congress on Agri innovations to combat food<br />

and nutrition challenges organized by Indian Society <strong>of</strong> Agronomy and PJTSAU,<br />

Hyderabad during 23-27 November, 2021<br />

Srinivas Ch, Srinivas I, Adake R. V, Santra P, Rao K.V, Sammi Reddy K, Yadav O.P and<br />

Mohan P Saxena 2018. Utilization <strong>of</strong> renewable energy sources in dryland systems. In<br />

12 th International Dryland Development Conference on “Sustainable Development<br />

Drylands in the Post 2015 World” during 21-24 August 2016 Alexandria, Egypt<br />

T5-32P-1379<br />

Design and Development <strong>of</strong> Planter for Intercropping Castor with Green<br />

Gram<br />

H. S. Chaudhary and R. N. Singh<br />

Centre for Natural Resources Management, Sardarkrushinagar Dantiwada Agricultural University,<br />

Gujarat (India) – 385 506<br />

In India, the area and production <strong>of</strong> castor is 9.10 lakh hectares and 18.89 lakh tones,<br />

respectively (Castor outlook report - July 2021, PJTSAU). Inter-cropping <strong>of</strong> short-duration<br />

crop like green-gram (Phaseolus radiates L.), black gram (P. mungo L.) and cluster bean<br />

(Cyamopsis tetragonoloba (L.) Taubert) with castor is remunerative for dry land conditions.<br />

Being a long duration, widely-spaced crop with comparatively thin plant population in<br />

comparison with other field crops, it <strong>of</strong>fers a great scope for using its inter-space by growing<br />

short-duration crop and thereby helps to harvest the potential productivity (Singh and Singh,<br />

1988).<br />

In Gujarat, most <strong>of</strong> the farmers adopt agricultural practices <strong>of</strong> sowing green gram and castor as<br />

an intercrop in the rainfed condition in Kharif season with green gram sowing by seed drill and<br />

then castor sowing manually for maintaining the desired spacing which takes more time as well<br />

energy. The manual method <strong>of</strong> sowing <strong>of</strong> castor is common in India, as well as in all Gujarat<br />

which results in more time requirement and serious backache <strong>of</strong> the farmers. Till now, there is<br />

no such type <strong>of</strong> intercrop planter is developed which can maintain the proper spacing between<br />

the castor and green gram crop simultaneously. To overcome this problem, there is need to<br />

Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment<br />

770 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

design a suitable intercrop planter that is able to perform the above said functions without<br />

damaging the seed and also reduce the cost <strong>of</strong> seeding as well as energy.<br />

Objectives:<br />

1. To design and development <strong>of</strong> intercrop planter for selected crop<br />

2. To evaluate the performance <strong>of</strong> developed intercrop planter<br />

3. To compute the economics <strong>of</strong> intercrop planter.<br />

Methodology<br />

Some agronomical practices <strong>of</strong> selected crops<br />

Crop Variety Seed rate (kg/ha)<br />

Row to row<br />

spacing (mm)<br />

Plant to plant<br />

spacing (mm)<br />

Castor GCH-7 5 1200 600<br />

Green gram GM-4 12-16 450 100<br />

The design considerations followed for mechanical components <strong>of</strong> prototype intercrop planter<br />

are explained under the following headings:<br />

1. Design <strong>of</strong> furrow opener<br />

2. Design <strong>of</strong> frame<br />

3. Design <strong>of</strong> power transmission system<br />

4. Design <strong>of</strong> seed metering mechanism<br />

Specifications <strong>of</strong> intercrop planter<br />

2.1 GENERAL<br />

Type : Tractor mounted<br />

Working width (Spacing × tynes),<br />

mm<br />

: 2600 (Seven tynes adjustable)<br />

Power sources as recommended : 35 hp and above Tractors<br />

Seeds on which test trials were<br />

requested to be conducted<br />

: Castor and green gram<br />

2.2 Seed metering mechanism<br />

Type : Inclined Metering Type<br />

Material : Plastic<br />

Size <strong>of</strong> feed shaft (Length × Dia.),<br />

mm<br />

: 1620 × 20 Φ<br />

Method <strong>of</strong> drive to feed shaft : Chain and sprocket<br />

Method <strong>of</strong> feed rate control :<br />

By changing gear ratio between ground<br />

wheel and metering roller<br />

771 | Page Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

2.3 Overall Dimensions, mm<br />

Dimensions Length Width Height<br />

With covering device 2700 1600 1425<br />

Without covering device 2600 1600 1425<br />

2.4 Mass, kg<br />

Without seed : 270<br />

With seed : 290<br />

2.5 Colour : White, orange and black<br />

Plan <strong>of</strong> experiment for metering device<br />

Independent variables<br />

Sr. No. Variables Levels<br />

1 Inclination <strong>of</strong> seed box 50 and 60 degree<br />

2 Size <strong>of</strong> cells<br />

1. Maximum seed dimension<br />

2. 5 per cent more than maximum seed dimensions<br />

3. 10 per cent more than maximum seed dimensions<br />

4. 20 per cent more than maximum seed dimensions<br />

The field trial was carried out at travel speed 4.5 km/h and with seed metering mechanism to<br />

observe the effect <strong>of</strong> cell size and inclination <strong>of</strong> plate.<br />

Results<br />

The construction <strong>of</strong> the machine was made sturdy and weight was kept matching to the pulling<br />

capacity <strong>of</strong> Tractor above 35hp. The total weight <strong>of</strong> the developed intercrop planter was 270<br />

kg. The unit price <strong>of</strong> developed planter was ₹ 56,500 /-.<br />

Based on the result <strong>of</strong> experiments <strong>of</strong> the study the following conclusions were drawn<br />

1. The intercrop planter was designed on the basis <strong>of</strong> agronomical crop practices and<br />

physical parameters namely length, width, thickness, bulk density, angle <strong>of</strong> repose,<br />

geometric mean diameter <strong>of</strong> castor and green gram.<br />

2. In calibration <strong>of</strong> intercrop planter, the desired seed rate obtained <strong>of</strong> castor and green<br />

gram were 4.73 kg/ha and 13.19 kg/ha at combination <strong>of</strong> 60˚ angle <strong>of</strong> inclination and<br />

13 mm and 6 mm size <strong>of</strong> cells, respectively.<br />

3. The developed intercrop planter was evaluated with castor and green gram in<br />

intercropping. The results shown that combination <strong>of</strong> 60˚ inclination angle and<br />

maximum seed size <strong>of</strong> metering plate was gave better results during the laboratory<br />

evaluation.<br />

4. At consummated combination <strong>of</strong> inclination angle and size <strong>of</strong> cells, the corresponding<br />

dependent variable such as seed rate, average seed spacing, missing index, multiple<br />

index and quality <strong>of</strong> feed index found were 4.73 kg/ha, 60.04 cm, 1.60 per cent, 0.00<br />

Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment<br />

772 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

per cent and 98.40 per cent for castor and 13.19 kg/ha, 9.72 cm, 0.00 per cent, 0.00 per<br />

cent and 98.00 per cent for green gram, respectively during laboratory evaluation.<br />

5. The results shown that combination <strong>of</strong> 60˚ inclination angle and maximum seed size <strong>of</strong><br />

metering plate was gave better results during the field evaluation.<br />

6. At consummated combination <strong>of</strong> inclination angle and size <strong>of</strong> cells, the corresponding<br />

dependent variable such as seed rate, average seed spacing, missing index, multiple<br />

index and quality <strong>of</strong> feed index found were 60.26 cm, 10.40 per cent, 0.00 per cent and<br />

89.60 per cent for castor and 9.95 cm, 8.00 per cent, 0.00 per cent and 92.00 per cent<br />

for green gram, respectively during field evaluation.<br />

7. Depth <strong>of</strong> sowing, speed <strong>of</strong> operation, draft, theoretical capacity, effective capacity, field<br />

efficiency, field machine index and fuel consumption were obtained 5 cm for castor,<br />

3.5 cm for green gram, 4.5 km/h, 233 kgf, 0.90 ha/h, 0.79 ha/h, 84.43 per cent, 87.77<br />

per cent and 3.61 l/h, respectively.<br />

8. Cost <strong>of</strong> operation, breakeven point and payback period <strong>of</strong> intercrop planter were<br />

Conclusions<br />

obtained ₹ 608 per hour (₹ 770 per ha), 18.90 h/annum and 2.06 year, respectively.<br />

Inclination angle <strong>of</strong> metering plate 60˚ and maximum seed size <strong>of</strong> metering plate was giving<br />

better results during the field evaluation. Developed planter saving in time and cost <strong>of</strong> planting<br />

compared with conventional method were 92.25 and 46.15 %, respectively.<br />

References<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>essor Jayashankar Telangana State Agricultural University, 2021. Agricultural Market<br />

Intelligence Centre, Castor outlook report - July 2021, PJTSAU. p 1.<br />

Singh J. P. and Singh, B. P. 1988. Intercropping <strong>of</strong> mung bean and guar in castor under dryland<br />

condition. Indian J. Agron, 33(2): 177-180.<br />

Kepner R. A, Bainer R. and Barger, E. L. 1987. Principles <strong>of</strong> farm machinery, CBS Publishers<br />

and Distributors, New Delhi. p: 25.<br />

Khurmi R. S. and Gupta, J. K. 2005. A textbook <strong>of</strong> machine design. S. Chand publishing.<br />

Sharma D. N. and Mukesh, S. (2019). Farm machinery design: Principles and problems. Jain<br />

brothers.<br />

Ajit Singh. 2011. Performance evaluation <strong>of</strong> bed planter for intercropping in castor. M.Tech.<br />

(Agril. Engg.). Thesis (Unpublished). CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar,<br />

Haryana.<br />

Ashoka H. G, Jayanthi B. and Prashantha G. M. 2012. Performance evaluation <strong>of</strong> power drawn<br />

six row groundnut planter. Int. J. Agric. Eng., 5(2): 123-126.<br />

773 | Page Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Leaf Propagation <strong>of</strong> Guava for Prevention <strong>of</strong> Root Knot Nematode<br />

R. Neelavathi 1 , C. Indu Rani 2 , M. Kumar 1 and P. Sridhar 1<br />

T5-33P-1417<br />

1 ICAR-Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University Tindivanam, Villupuram district<br />

604002, Tamil Nadu, India<br />

2 Horticultural College and Research Institute, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University Coimbatore 641<br />

003, Tamil Nadu, India<br />

Guava (Psidium guajava L.) is cultivated in an area <strong>of</strong> 2.87 lakh hectares with an annual<br />

production <strong>of</strong> 43.04 lakh tonnes. It is good for diabetic patients due to the very low glycemic<br />

index and glycemic load <strong>of</strong> fruits. It is a highly remunerative crop with good management<br />

practices. Recently, it has been affected by the guava root knot nematode, Meloidogyne<br />

enterolobii (Poornima et al., 2016) in major guava growing states <strong>of</strong> India. The nematode<br />

spreads rapidly and makes the cultivation <strong>of</strong> guava unviable and unpr<strong>of</strong>itable. The major cause<br />

<strong>of</strong> the spread <strong>of</strong> this nematode is through soil along with planting materials. To overcome this,<br />

the production <strong>of</strong> planting materials without nematode infestation through a suitable<br />

propagation method is very essential. The propagation <strong>of</strong> guava through leaves and stem<br />

cutting will be highly useful for producing nematode free planting materials. The present study<br />

was conducted in to standardize concentration <strong>of</strong> Indole Butyric Acid (IBA) and treatment<br />

duration for guava propagation through leaves.<br />

Methodology<br />

The present research work was carried out at ICAR-Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Tamil Nadu<br />

Agricultural University, Tindivanam, Villupuram district, Tamil Nadu during 2021-22. The<br />

experiment was laid out in a Completely Randomized Design with five replications. Just<br />

mature leaves and mature leaves <strong>of</strong> guava cv. Lucknow 49 were collected and dipped in 1,000<br />

and 2,000 ppm <strong>of</strong> Indole Butyric Acid for 1 and 2 minutes. After dipping, the guava leaves<br />

were planted in 50 cavity protrays containing well decomposed cocopeat and kept under shade<br />

net. The number <strong>of</strong> days taken for rooting, rooting percentage, number <strong>of</strong> roots, number <strong>of</strong> days<br />

taken for shoot formation and shoot length were all recorded and subjected to statistical<br />

analysis.<br />

Results<br />

The concentration <strong>of</strong> IBA and treatment duration has significant effects on the number <strong>of</strong> days<br />

for rooting, rooting percentage, number <strong>of</strong> roots, number <strong>of</strong> days taken for shoot formation and<br />

shoot length. Treatment, T 7-Just mature leaves (3 rd leaf from shoot tip) + 2,000 ppm IBA for 1<br />

minute was found to be the best for rooting (37.65days), rooting percentage (81.63%) in guava<br />

leaves followed by T 9- Just mature leaves (3 rd leaf from shoot tip) + 2,000 ppm IBA for 2<br />

minutes. The complete drying <strong>of</strong> the mature leaves was observed in all treatments. Treatment,<br />

Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment<br />

774 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

T7 - Just mature leaves (3 rd leaf from shoot tip) dipped in 2,000 ppm IBA for 1 minute was<br />

found to be the best for and number <strong>of</strong> roots (36.74) on 60 th day. The rooted leaves are<br />

transferred to polybags containing red soil, sand and well decomposed farmyard manure.<br />

Treatment, T7- Just mature leaves (3 rd leaf from shoot tip) + 2,000 ppm IBA for 1 minute was<br />

found to be the best for shooting (67.93days) in guava leaves. The growth <strong>of</strong> the shoot was<br />

better in treatment, T7 (12.77 cm), followed by treatment, T9 (13.22 cm). Treatment, T7-Just<br />

mature leaves (3 rd leaf from shoot tip) + 2,000 ppm IBA for 1 minute (81.22%) was found to<br />

be the best for rooting in guava leaves.<br />

Parameters on rooting and shoot formation in Guava leaves cv. Lucknow 49<br />

Sl.<br />

No<br />

Treatments<br />

Number<br />

<strong>of</strong> days<br />

for<br />

rooting<br />

Rooting<br />

percentage<br />

Number <strong>of</strong><br />

roots/plant<br />

on 60 th day<br />

Days for<br />

shoot<br />

formation<br />

1. T 1 : Just mature leaves - - - - -<br />

2. T 2 : Mature leaves - - - - -<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

7.<br />

8.<br />

9.<br />

10.<br />

Conclusion<br />

T 3 : Just mature leaves +<br />

1,000 ppm IBA for 1 minute<br />

T 4 : Mature leaves + 1,000<br />

ppm IBA for 1 minute<br />

T 5 : Just mature leaves +<br />

1,000 ppm for 2 minutes<br />

T 6 : Mature leaves + 1,000<br />

ppm for 2 minutes<br />

T 7 : Just mature leaves +<br />

2,000 ppm IBA for 1 minute<br />

T 8 : Mature leaves + 2,000<br />

ppm IBA for 1 minute<br />

T 9 : Just mature leaves +<br />

2,000 ppm IBA for 2<br />

minutes<br />

T 10 : Mature leaves + 2,000<br />

ppm IBA for 2 minutes<br />

Shoot<br />

length<br />

(cm)<br />

- - - - -<br />

- - - - -<br />

- - - - -<br />

- - - - -<br />

37.65 81.63 36.74 67.93 13.22<br />

- - - - -<br />

39.67 10.45 38.10 69.69 10.32<br />

- - - - -<br />

Mean 38.66 46.04 37.42 68.81 11.77<br />

CD (0.05) 1.85 10.12 0.16 1.68 0.91<br />

Among treatments evaluated, Treatment, T7 - Just mature leaves (3 rd leaf from shoot tip) +<br />

2,000 ppm IBA for 1 minute was found to be the best for rooting (37.65 days) in guava leaves,<br />

rooting percentage (81.63%), number <strong>of</strong> roots (36.74), number <strong>of</strong> days taken for shoot<br />

formation (67.93). shoot length (13.22cm) and survival (81.22%) <strong>of</strong> leaf propagated plants.<br />

775 | Page Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Leaf propagation will be a novel method <strong>of</strong> propagation to prevent the entry <strong>of</strong> guava root knot<br />

nematode, Meloidogyne enterolobii.<br />

References<br />

Poornima K, Suresh P, Kalaiarasan , Subramanian S. and Ramaraju K. 2016. Root Knot<br />

Nematode, Meloidogyne enterolobii in Guava (Psidium guajava L.) A New Record<br />

from India. Madras Agric. J. 103.<br />

T5-34P-1491<br />

Soil Moisture Indices Using Copernicus Soil Water Index for Drought<br />

Studies<br />

K. V. Rao 1 , G. S. Pratyusha Kranthi 1 , S. Deepika 1 , D. Kalyana Srinivas 1 , V. K. Singh 1 ,<br />

Giriraj Amarnath 2 and A. K. Sikka 2<br />

1 ICAR-Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, Hyderabad<br />

2 International Water Management Institute (IWMI).<br />

Soil moisture is widely recognized as an essential parameter for drought risk assessments as<br />

well as for vegetative stress predictions (Robinson et al., 2008, Dobriyal et al., 2012).<br />

Depletion in soil moisture cause stress in plants and results in crop failure. The deficit soil<br />

moisture volume during crop growing season is a good index <strong>of</strong> agricultural drought intensity,<br />

indicating recent precipitation shortages and limited conditions for crop production (Keyantash<br />

etal., 2002). Many drought indices based on soil moisture have been developed for drought<br />

studies which are very effective in monitoring drought. Indices like the soil moisture index<br />

(SMI) (Sridhar et al., 2008, Hunt et al., 2009) and soil water deficit index (SWDI) (Martnez-<br />

Fernndez et al., 2015) are some agricultural drought indices based on the actual soil moisture<br />

content and known field capacity and wilting point at each location. In this study two indices<br />

were derived using Copernicus soil moisture index (SMI) namely Moisture Condition Index<br />

(MCI) and Soil moisture Index Anomaly (SMA) for drought studies.<br />

Methodology<br />

The Copernicus Global Land Service (CGLS) provides a series <strong>of</strong> bio-geophysical products on<br />

state and evolution <strong>of</strong> Earth's surface on a global scale with 0.1 degree or 12.5km resolution.<br />

Soil Moisture Index (SMI) is estimated in a timely manner and supplemented by long-term<br />

time series. A 10-day soil moisture was downloaded for the period 2000 to 2015. Following<br />

equations are use to calculate MCI and SMA.<br />

MCI =<br />

<br />

<br />

Equation 1<br />

SMA = <br />

<br />

Equation 2<br />

Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment<br />

776 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Where:<br />

SWI = SWI <strong>of</strong> current day<br />

SWI = Maximum <strong>of</strong> average SWI for the period 2000 to 2015<br />

SWI = Minimum <strong>of</strong> average SWI for the period 2000 to 2015<br />

SWI µ = Mean SWI for the period 2000 to 2015<br />

SWI = Standard Deviation <strong>of</strong> SWI for the period 2000 to 2015<br />

Results<br />

MCI and SWA indices (fig) were generated using the formulas mentioned in equation 1,2 and<br />

3 respectively. MCI is classified into extreme, severe, moderate and mild categories. As<br />

mentioned by Copernicus European Drought Observatory, SMA values below -1 and greater<br />

than or equal to -2 represent drier than normal condition, -1 to 1 is normal, above 1 and less or<br />

equal to 2 represent wetter than normal condition. Negative anomalies <strong>of</strong> SMA and extreme,<br />

severe and moderate conditions <strong>of</strong> MCI are associated with drought conditions since soil<br />

moisture content is strongly connected to plant biomass accumulation in many environments<br />

where water availability is the main limiting factor. The MCI and SMA combined with<br />

dryspell, Progressive Difference Normalized Vegetation Index (PDNDVI) <strong>of</strong>fer better<br />

assessment <strong>of</strong> prevailing drought conditions.<br />

Conclusion<br />

Two indices MCI and SMA are developed using SMI <strong>of</strong> Copernicus Global Land Service<br />

which could be used for drought monitoring.<br />

Soil Moisture Index (SMI), Soil Moisture Anomaly (SMA), Moisture Condition Index (MCI) for the<br />

month <strong>of</strong> June 2022<br />

777 | Page Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

References<br />

Copernicus European Drought Observatory (EDO): http://edo.jrc.ec.europa.eu/. European<br />

Commission, 2019.<br />

Dobriyal P, Qureshi A, Badola R and Hussain SA. 2012. A review <strong>of</strong> the methods available<br />

for estimating soil moisture and its implications for water resource management. J.<br />

Hydrol, 458-459: 110-117.<br />

Keyantash J and Dracup JA. 2002. The quantification <strong>of</strong> drought: an evaluation <strong>of</strong> drought<br />

indices. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 83: 1167-1180.<br />

Martinez-Fernandez J, Gonzalez-Zamora A, Sanchez N and Gumuzzio A. 2015. A soil water<br />

based index as a suitable agricultural drought indicator. J. Hydrol., 522: pp. 265-273.<br />

Robinson DA, Campbell CS, Hopmans JW, Hornbuckle BK, Jones SB, Knight R, Ogden F,<br />

Selke J and Wendroth O. 2008. Soil Moisture Measurement for Ecological and<br />

Hydrological Watershed-Scale Observatories: A Review. Vadose zone J., 7(1).<br />

Sridhar V, Hubbard KG, You J, Hunt ED. 2008. Development <strong>of</strong> the Soil Moisture Index to<br />

Quantify Agricultural Drought and Its “User Friendliness” in Severity-Area-Duration<br />

Assessment. J. Hydrometeorol. P<br />

T5-35P-1528<br />

Soil Conservation Practices for Climate Change Adaptation in Bihar State<br />

Pooja Jena 1 Manoher Saryam 2 , Shailabala Dei 1 , and Arabind Kumar Sinha 3<br />

1 Bihar Agricultural University, Sabour (Bihar)<br />

2 Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi (Uttar Pradesh)<br />

3 Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Bhagalpur (Bihar)<br />

Agriculture places a heavy burden on the land and environment in the process <strong>of</strong> providing<br />

food for man, and climate factors in agricultural production is having its toll on soil fertility in<br />

Bihar state. Soil conservation technique is the application <strong>of</strong> processes to the solution <strong>of</strong> soil<br />

management problems. The conservation <strong>of</strong> soil implies utilization without waste so as to make<br />

possible a continuously high level <strong>of</strong> crop production while improving environmental quality.<br />

Soil conversation, in practice refers to the protection <strong>of</strong> all surface deposits, not merely the<br />

near-surface, organic layers that are subject to present-day weathering. Climate change is<br />

occurring, and the implementation <strong>of</strong> sound conservation practices will be key for each<br />

country’s health, social stability, and security. There are a large number <strong>of</strong> peer-reviewed<br />

publications that report on the effects <strong>of</strong> a changing climate. The potential role <strong>of</strong> conservation<br />

practices in contributing to food security, illustrates the relationship between climate change,<br />

soil and water resources, and food security. The common climate adaptation strategies among<br />

Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment<br />

778 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

the farmers were mulching, green and farmyard manuring, cover crops and mixed cropping,<br />

which have direct effect on soil nutrient. Other strategies to mitigate the effect <strong>of</strong> flooding such<br />

as terracing and contouring were seldom used. Farmers’ opinion towards climate adaptation<br />

strategies is that no significant yield increase was achieved, and the techniques were not costeffective.<br />

Also, the techniques require technical know-how, which they lacked. Major<br />

constraints to farmers’ use <strong>of</strong> the climate adaptation strategies were pressure on land, lack <strong>of</strong><br />

knowledge on soil conservation techniques, inadequate information and education on use <strong>of</strong><br />

soil conservation techniques and insecure land tenure system. Trainings should be organized<br />

for the farmers to educate and inform them about environment friendly soil conservation<br />

practices that will improve and increase their yield thereby improving their income.<br />

T5-36P-1535<br />

Correlation <strong>of</strong> Weather Variables on the Development <strong>of</strong> Makhana Leaf<br />

Spot Disease in the Koshi Region <strong>of</strong> Bihar<br />

Md. Nadeem Akhtar 1 *, Santosh Kumar 2 , Krishna Murari Singh 3 and<br />

Amrendra Kumar 4<br />

1,3 Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Agwanpur, Saharsa, Bihar.<br />

2 Mandan Bharti Agricultural College, Agwanpur, Saharsa -852 201, Bihar<br />

4 Agricultural Technology Application Research Institute, Patna (Zone IV), Bihar<br />

Makhana (Euryale ferox salisb) a member <strong>of</strong> the family Nymphaeaceae, is an emergent floating<br />

macrophyte plant, which is cultivated commercially as a cash crop. It is also known as fox nut,<br />

gorgon nut, and food <strong>of</strong> God. The center for makhana cultivation lies in the tropical and<br />

subtropical regions <strong>of</strong> South East and East Asia. In India, North Bihar, the lower Assam region,<br />

Odisha, West Bengal, Meghalaya, Jammu & Kashmir, and Manipur are some <strong>of</strong> the states<br />

where the makhana is cultivated (Kumar et al., 2011). However, North Bihar is well-known<br />

for makhana production not only at the national level but also at the global level. The area<br />

comprises about 20,000 ha, which covers about 80% <strong>of</strong> the acreage and production <strong>of</strong> more<br />

than 90% (Jana, 2016). Makhana is affected by various kinds <strong>of</strong> diseases caused by fungi. Leaf<br />

spot caused by Alternaria tenuissima is one <strong>of</strong> the most catastrophic and widespread diseases<br />

which causes substantial yield loss (Kumar et al., 2020). Severe foliage infections were<br />

observed in makhana <strong>of</strong> the Koshi zone <strong>of</strong> Bihar, while the survey and surveillance program<br />

during crop season, 2018, where, 25–30% <strong>of</strong> leaf areas in one-fourth population <strong>of</strong> makhana in<br />

most <strong>of</strong> the ponds were infected (Kumar et al., 2020). Since weather factors have an overriding<br />

influence on crop stage and the progress <strong>of</strong> the disease. Therefore, monitoring <strong>of</strong> weather<br />

conditions <strong>of</strong> different crop stages is an important concern in disease management and<br />

prediction. Moreover, rare information is available related to the epidemiology <strong>of</strong> this disease.<br />

Therefore, considering the devastation <strong>of</strong> makhana due to leaf spot, an experiment was<br />

779 | Page Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

formulated and conducted to assess the relationship between the occurrence & progress <strong>of</strong> this<br />

disease under prevailing weather variables in the Koshi zone <strong>of</strong> Bihar.<br />

The impact <strong>of</strong> weather variables viz., temperature, humidity, and rainfall on the development<br />

<strong>of</strong> leaf spot disease in makhana in the Koshi Zone <strong>of</strong> Bihar has taken under investigation, while<br />

the crop season (March-August) 2020 and 2021. The studies revealed that the maximum leaf<br />

spot severity occurred in mid-July, 2020 and 2021, which was 16.75% and 17.67%<br />

respectively. However, it was minimum during April 2020 and 2021. The disease severity<br />

reached its plateau when the respective mean temperature and RH were 32.7 o C & 85.5% in<br />

June-August 2019. Similar trends <strong>of</strong> the plateau were seen in June-August 2021 when the<br />

respective mean temperature and RH were 35.2 o C & 86.9%. The respective average rainfall<br />

recorded in 2020 and 2021 favoring the maximum severity were 138.5 and 148.0 mm. The<br />

correlation <strong>of</strong> leaf spot severity with weather variables was strongly positive, which was 0.983<br />

with the mean temperature, 0.965 with the mean relative humidity, and 0.959 with rainfall at a<br />

1% level <strong>of</strong> significance. Regression analysis also supported the mentioned value <strong>of</strong> weather<br />

variables as an optimum value responsible for leaf spot disease.<br />

T5-37P-1538<br />

Study the Effect <strong>of</strong> Different Chemical on Biochemical and Functional<br />

Properties <strong>of</strong> Custard Apple (Annona squamosa L.) During Storage<br />

Indraraj Ghasil 1 , N. K. Meena 2 , J. K. Balyan 1 and Hitesh Muwal 1<br />

1 Dryland Farming research Station, Arjia, Bhilwara (MPUAT, Udaipur)<br />

2 Department <strong>of</strong> Fruit Science, Agriculture University, Kota, Rajasthan<br />

Custard apple (Annona squamosa L.) is a delicious fruit cultivated in tropical and sub-tropical<br />

climate. it belongs to family Annonaceae and native <strong>of</strong> the West Indies. Custard apple is an<br />

arid fruit crop and hardy in nature requires dry climate with mild winter. It can grow from sea<br />

level up to 100 m above the mean sea level elevation and also drought (Singh, 1992). The<br />

ripened fruits are consumed mainly in fresh form. There has been great demand for custard<br />

apple in preparation <strong>of</strong> ice-cream and pudding. Custard apple contains, protein (1.6 g), fat (0.5-<br />

0.6 g), carbohydrates (23.5g), crude fiber (0.9-6.6 g), calcium (17.6 mg), phosphorus (47 mg),<br />

iron (1.5 mg), thiamine (0.075-0.119 mg), rib<strong>of</strong>lavin (0.086-0.175 mg), ascorbic Acid (15.0 -<br />

44.4 mg), nicotinic Acid (0.5 mg), per 100 g <strong>of</strong> edible portion <strong>of</strong> custard apple. Custard apple<br />

is highly climacteric fruit. It ripens within 2-3 days after harvesting at commercial maturity<br />

stage. It steadily produces ethylene in large amount and owing to that the shelf life <strong>of</strong> fruits is<br />

very poor. At room temperature fruits remain fit for consumption only for 3-4 days after that<br />

decay starts. Its pulp is also containing high amount <strong>of</strong> phenolics, there<strong>of</strong> it become prone to<br />

oxidation during air contact. Post-harvest application <strong>of</strong> oxalic acid (OA), salicylic acid (SA)<br />

and sodium nitroprusside (SNP) could be a better solution to enhance the quality and storage<br />

Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment<br />

780 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

life <strong>of</strong> custard apple. Oxalic acid reduces the production <strong>of</strong> polygalacturonase (PG) and pectin<br />

methyl esterase (PME), which will be responsible for cell wall degradation, so that the treated<br />

fruit maintains the firmness (Wu et al., 2011). Salicylic acid is an endogenous plant hormone<br />

which plays an important role in enhancing fruit quality and positively effects on reducing<br />

respiration and ethylene biosynthesis rates, weight loss, decay and s<strong>of</strong>tening <strong>of</strong> the fruits<br />

(Shafiee et al., 2010). Sodium nitroprusside (SNP) can release nitric oxide (NO) by reduction<br />

and decomposition. Since Nitrous Oxide decreases ethylene synthesis, during ripening and fruit<br />

senescence. Application <strong>of</strong> these eco-friendly chemicals explored in many fruits but remains<br />

unexplored in custard apple. There is urgent need to develop low cost and eco-friendly<br />

approaches.<br />

Methodology<br />

The mature, freshly harvested, uniform size and quality fruits <strong>of</strong> custard apple cv. “Balanagar’’<br />

free from insect pest and microbial infection procured from the experimental orchard <strong>of</strong> AICRP<br />

on AZF, College <strong>of</strong> Horticulture and Forestry, Jhalawar and to the laboratory <strong>of</strong> Department<br />

<strong>of</strong> Post-Harvest Technology, College <strong>of</strong> Horticulture and Forestry, Jhalawar (Rajasthan). After<br />

preliminary sorting, the fruits were washed thoroughly in tap water to remove the dirt and dust<br />

from the surface <strong>of</strong> fruit and then fruits were dried in the air. The whole lots <strong>of</strong> fruits were<br />

being randomly divided into 13 lots and each lots containing 20 fruits were given following<br />

postharvest treatments (Oxalic acid @ 2.5 mM, 5.0 mM, 7.5 mM, 10.0 Mm, Salicylic acid @<br />

0.5 mM, 1.0 mM, 1.5 mM, 2.0 mM, Sodium Nitro Prusside@ 0.5 mM, 1.0 mM, 1.5 mM, 2.0<br />

mM) by dipping the fruits in respective chemical solution for 10 minutes followed by air<br />

drying. These fruits were kept in aerated corrugated boxes. The data collected as a part <strong>of</strong><br />

experiment will be analyzed by following analytical method as followed for Completely<br />

Randomized Design (CRD).<br />

Results<br />

TSS was significantly affected by different post-harvest treatments during entire storage<br />

period. On 9 th day <strong>of</strong> storage maximum increment in TSS (38.87°Brix) was observed in<br />

treatment T12 (Sodium Nitro Prusside @ 2.0 mM ) and lowest (25.61°Brix) in treatment T0<br />

(Control). T 12 treatment was found superior over all other treatments. A sharp drop was<br />

witnessed in titratable acidity <strong>of</strong> all fruits during whole storage period although on 9 th day <strong>of</strong><br />

storage maximum decrease in titratable acidity was perceived in fruits treatments with Salicylic<br />

acid @ 2.0 mM) (57.81%) and Oxalic acid @ 5.0 mM (57.81%) and lowest with Salicylic<br />

acid @ 1.0 mM (23.68%). It is apparent from the data revealed that different post-harvest<br />

treatments significantly influenced the total sugar during entire storage period <strong>of</strong> custard apple<br />

fruits. Application <strong>of</strong> Sodium Nitro Prusside @ 2.0 mM recorded maximum increment<br />

(70.26%) <strong>of</strong> total sugar and minimum increment (26.26%) was recorded under control on 9 th<br />

day <strong>of</strong> storage. Further, Sodium Nitro Prusside @ 2.0 mM was found significantly better among<br />

781 | Page Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

rest <strong>of</strong> the treatments. The total phenols content was significantly affected by different<br />

treatments during entire storage period. The minimum reduction (11.62%) in total phenols<br />

content was found that Sodium Nitro Prusside @ 2.0 mM), while it was maximum (21.94%)<br />

in fruits under control (on 9 th day <strong>of</strong> storage). Coating with Sodium Nitro Prusside @ 2.0 mM)<br />

was found significantly at par with Salicylic acid @ 1.5 mM (11.81%). The antioxidant activity<br />

was significantly affected by different treatments during entire storage period. The minimum<br />

reduction (34.75%) in antioxidant activity was found with Sodium Nitro Prusside @ 2.0 mM,<br />

while it was maximum (85.71%) in fruits under control (on 9 th day <strong>of</strong> storage). However,<br />

Sodium Nitro Prusside @ 2.0 mM was found superior over all other treatments. Similar<br />

findings were also observed by Ghasil, et.al. (2022)<br />

Conclusion<br />

On the basis <strong>of</strong> results obtained in the present research experiment, it may be concluded that<br />

coating with Sodium Nitro Prusside @ 2.0 mM was found significantly superior over all other<br />

treatments and it also observed in maintaining the quality and extending the shelf life <strong>of</strong><br />

Balanagar custard apple fruits. Further, under this treatment recorded highest TSS<br />

(38.87°Brix), maximum increment <strong>of</strong> total sugar (70.26%), highest ascorbic acid (43.20<br />

mg/100g), minimum reduction <strong>of</strong> phenol content (11.62%) and highest antioxidant capacity<br />

(0.92 μmol Trolox/100 g) end <strong>of</strong> the storage period. However, Sodium Nitro Prusside @ 2.0<br />

mM) was found best for maintaining biochemical and functional activities and increased the<br />

shelf life up to 8 days <strong>of</strong> storage at room temperature.<br />

References<br />

Ghasil.I. .2011. Effect <strong>of</strong> post-harvest treatments on biochemical and bioactive compounds <strong>of</strong><br />

Custard Apple (Annona squanosa L) Cv. Int. J. Fruit Sci., 22(1):826-836.<br />

Shafiee M, Taghavi T.S. and Babalar M. 2010. Addition <strong>of</strong> salicylic acid to nutrient solution<br />

combined with postharvest treatments (hot water, salicylic acid, and calcium dipping)<br />

improved postharvest fruit quality <strong>of</strong> strawberry. Scientia Horticulturae, 124(1):40–45.<br />

Singh S.P. 1992. Fruit crops for wastelands. Scientific Publishers, New Pali Road, Jodhpur-<br />

342001, India. pp 49-64.<br />

Wu F, Zhang D, Zhang H, Jiang G, Su X. and Qu, H. 2011. Physiological and biochemical<br />

response <strong>of</strong> harvested plum fruit to oxalic acid during ripening or shelf-life. Food Res.<br />

Int., 44: 1299-1305.<br />

Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment<br />

782 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

T5-38P-1589<br />

Cloud Computing, Data science for Big Data Management in Agriculture<br />

R. Lakshmi Sreya<br />

Maturi Venkata Subba Rao (MVSR) Engineering College, Hyderabad, India<br />

Farm productivity and farmer income in India is plagued with several challenges – marginal<br />

land holdings <strong>of</strong> farmers making mechanization difficult and implementation <strong>of</strong> technology<br />

difficult or unviable, timely access to genuine and high-quality inputs and farming advice,<br />

heavily intermediated supply chains, dependence on monsoon rains, and inadequate storage<br />

facilities. Cloud computing technology in agricultural area has greater scope in the overall<br />

development <strong>of</strong> India. This paper reviews the potential uses <strong>of</strong> cloud computing in agriculture.<br />

Methodology<br />

This paper is based on literature review <strong>of</strong> application <strong>of</strong> data science tools in making<br />

agriculture more competitive and efficient.<br />

Results<br />

Data science is the method <strong>of</strong> gleaning insights from data. It enables the use <strong>of</strong> real-time data<br />

and past data to form meaningful insights on buyer behavior, customer credit behavior, product<br />

testing, cropping patterns, and others. Data science already plays a significant role in banking<br />

and healthcare, both in India and globally. The principles <strong>of</strong> data science could also be applied<br />

to the Indian agriculture industry across the value chain from the farm through retail.<br />

Agriculture and cloud computing cloud services:<br />

a) Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS):<br />

Infrastructure as a Service abbreviated as IaaS, contains the basic building blocks for cloud IT<br />

and typically provide access to networking features, computers (virtual or on dedicated<br />

hardware), and data storage space. Infrastructure as a Service provides you with the highest<br />

level <strong>of</strong> flexibility and management control over your IT resources and is most similar to<br />

existing IT resources that many IT departments and developers are familiar with today.<br />

b) Platform as a Service (PaaS):<br />

Platforms as a service remove the need for organizations to manage the underlying<br />

infrastructure (usually hardware and operating systems) and allow you to focus on the<br />

deployment and management <strong>of</strong> your applications. This helps you to be more efficient as you<br />

don’t need to worry about resource procurement, capacity planning, s<strong>of</strong>tware maintenance,<br />

patching, or any <strong>of</strong> the other undifferentiated heavy lifting involved in running your<br />

application.<br />

783 | Page Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

c) S<strong>of</strong>tware as a Service (SaaS):<br />

S<strong>of</strong>tware as a Service provides you with a completed product that is run and managed by the<br />

service provider. In most cases, people referring to S<strong>of</strong>tware as a Service are referring to enduser<br />

applications. With a SaaS <strong>of</strong>fering you do not have to think about how the service is<br />

maintained or how the underlying infrastructure is managed; you only need to think about<br />

how you will use that particular piece s<strong>of</strong>tware. A common example <strong>of</strong> a SaaS application is<br />

web-based email where you can send and receive email without having to manage feature<br />

additions to the email product or maintaining the servers and operating systems that the email<br />

program is running on.<br />

The relationship between Cloud computing and agricultural development is seen as<br />

applications.<br />

The applications <strong>of</strong> cloud computing technology in agriculture can solve the bottleneck<br />

problem <strong>of</strong> agricultural modernization and agricultural information and can also break<br />

agricultural producers’ limitations in knowledge or technology, reduce duplication, improve<br />

utilization <strong>of</strong> existing resources to make up for dispersed, small-scale, regional differences<br />

agricultural production and the strong dependence on the natural climate vulnerability <strong>of</strong><br />

agricultural production.<br />

Organizational form <strong>of</strong> production in agriculture is relatively simple, backward and a low<br />

degree <strong>of</strong> specialization <strong>of</strong> agricultural production areas, it is difficult to achieve integrating<br />

agriculture.<br />

In addition, due to the limitations <strong>of</strong> the farmers at market forecasting, business decisionmaking,<br />

information gathering, and logistics management capacity is more lacking; it <strong>of</strong>ten<br />

leads to a mismatch between the supply and demand, not only damages the farmers' own<br />

interests, have also hindered the healthy development <strong>of</strong> the market supply and demand.<br />

Conclusion:<br />

This prominent technique may deliver the agriculture-based knowledge along with<br />

management <strong>of</strong> natural resources and knowledge directly to the consumers not only in a small<br />

region like in nonstop marketing or shops but also in a wider region. This will change the<br />

whole supply chain, which is mainly in the hand <strong>of</strong> large companies, now, but can change to<br />

a more direct, shorter chain between producers and consumers. Cloud computing technology,<br />

applicable for the improvement <strong>of</strong> agriculture growth, food, grain, product, economic<br />

condition, ensure food safety, GDP <strong>of</strong> the nation & circulate information related to agriculture.<br />

Now, much more than in the past, agriculture pr<strong>of</strong>essionals can dig into data and use it to<br />

make highly informed decisions. The advancements <strong>of</strong> data scientists are making this reality<br />

possible, both now and for the foreseeable future.<br />

Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment<br />

784 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

References<br />

Patel R. and Patel, M. 2013. Application <strong>of</strong> Cloud Computing in Agricultural Development <strong>of</strong><br />

Rural India. International Journal <strong>of</strong> Computer Science and Information Technologies.<br />

4(6): 922-926.<br />

Kamath, S. and Chetan A. A. 2011. Affordable, interactive crowd sourcing platform for<br />

sustainable agriculture: Enabling public private partnerships. Cloud Computing<br />

Journal, April 2011.<br />

Patel, R. and Patel M. 2013. Application <strong>of</strong> Cloud Computing in Agricultural Development <strong>of</strong><br />

Rural India. Int. J. Comput. Sci. Inf. Technol., 4(6): 922-926.<br />

Hori M, Kawashima E. and Yamazaki T. (2010) "Application <strong>of</strong> cloud computing to agriculture<br />

and prospects in other fields", Fujitsu Science and Technology Journal, Vol.46, No.4,<br />

pp.446–454.<br />

Jianxun Zhang, Zhimin Gu, and Chao Zheng, " A Summary <strong>of</strong> Research Progress on Cloud<br />

Computing", Application Research <strong>of</strong> Computers, Vol. 27, No. 2, 2010, 429-433.<br />

T5-39P-1598<br />

Feasibility <strong>of</strong> Appropriate Mechanization in Cultivation <strong>of</strong> Millets in Rainfed Eco System<br />

I. Srinivas, Ashish S Dhimate, R. V. Adake. G. Pratibha, G. Venkatesh and<br />

K. Sammi Reddy and M. Srinivasa Rao<br />

ICAR-Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, Hyderabad, India-500059<br />

Millets have become important food grains in our life and were considered as low starch<br />

content grains for healthy diet. Total area under millets (excluding Jawar and Bajra) is about<br />

1.6 million ha and producing about 2.35 million tons <strong>of</strong> millets (2020-21) with average grain<br />

yield <strong>of</strong> 1.46 tons/ha apart from producing considerable amount <strong>of</strong> biomass for fodder needs<br />

<strong>of</strong> animals. It was observed that 89 % <strong>of</strong> the millets are produced from the rainfed eco system<br />

only. These are produced from the small and marginal lands owned by the small to medium<br />

farmers who don’t have enough resources. Apart from that, the scarcity <strong>of</strong> labour during the<br />

peak operations is a major hurdle for proper management <strong>of</strong> millet production system.<br />

Availability <strong>of</strong> suitable implements for sowing and inter cultivation are key issues for meeting<br />

the timeliness <strong>of</strong> the required operations. Keeping all these point in consideration performance<br />

evaluation <strong>of</strong> CRIDA 6 row planter and zero till planter carried out at CRIDA research farm<br />

with modified inclined metering plate. Appropriate mechanization in intercultural operations<br />

like weeding and spraying helped in increasing the productivity <strong>of</strong> the millets apart from<br />

reducing the cultivation cost significantly.<br />

785 | Page Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Methodology<br />

Most <strong>of</strong> farmers from dryland own 35 hp tractor. To suit their power availability six row planter<br />

was developed. The design consists <strong>of</strong> hopper box for seed and fertilizer, drive mechanism,<br />

mounting frame, seed tubes and metering plates. Row to row spacing can be maintained by<br />

adjusting the shanks on the frame as per the recommended spacing. It provides effective soil<br />

covering, uniform seed to seed distance, faster coverage. Moreover, mechanical sowing<br />

increased crop yield and pr<strong>of</strong>it, time saving by 80 % and labour saving, 30 % saving in seed<br />

and fertilizer when compared to the conventional. The modified inclined metering plates to<br />

accommodate the smaller size seeds ranging 1 to 3 mm size with 2 to 3 mm length optimized<br />

the required seed dropping for better germination with recommended plant-to-plant spacing.<br />

The depth <strong>of</strong> sowing was also observed to be very critical parameter for the alfisol soils with<br />

proper coverage.<br />

Specification <strong>of</strong> tractor drawn CRIDA six row planter<br />

S. no. Particulars Specification<br />

1. Overall Dimension (L*W*H) 2121 x 640 x 980 mm<br />

2. Metering mechanism Inclined plate<br />

3. Source <strong>of</strong> power 35-45hp<br />

4. Type <strong>of</strong> Seed Multi-crop planter, metering plates available as per<br />

seed type<br />

5. Furrow opener Shovel type furrow openers<br />

6. Furrow spacing Adjustable<br />

7. Depth <strong>of</strong> sowing adjustable<br />

8. Weight <strong>of</strong> machine 275 kg<br />

Results<br />

Appropriate mechanization <strong>of</strong> sowing with CRIDA 6-row planter and CRIDA Zero till planter<br />

helped in increase in yields by 20 to 30 % in Sorghum, Finger millet, Pearl millet and Foxtail<br />

millets. A tractor drawn weeder was used to remove the weeds with proper earthing up<br />

operation gave good anchoring to the plants apart from making better aeration and nutrient<br />

availability to the plants. The 8 “width rear wheels for the tractor made the weeding easy with<br />

less or no damage to the plants. It was also observed that the modified row spacing <strong>of</strong> 40 to 45<br />

cm helped in better tractor drawn weeding and spraying operations which helped in reducing<br />

cost <strong>of</strong> operation and also significant amount <strong>of</strong> drudgery. Overall, it was observed that, the<br />

partial mechanization in millet production system reduced the cost <strong>of</strong> cultivation by 30 to 40<br />

% and increased the yields.<br />

Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment<br />

786 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

T5-40P-1711<br />

Small Scale Farm Mechanization: An Archangle to Climate Resilient<br />

Agriculture<br />

M. V. Tiwari, V. K. Poshia, and P. D. Verma<br />

KVK, Navsari Agricultural University, Dediapda, Gujarat<br />

In rural India, the percentage <strong>of</strong> women who depend on agriculture for their livelihood is as<br />

high as 84%. Women make up about 33% <strong>of</strong> cultivators and about 47% percent <strong>of</strong> agricultural<br />

labourers. Women Farmers are those who work in acres, not in hours, they don’t work till the<br />

sun gets down, but they surely work till the job gets done. Agricultural machines and equipment<br />

are mostly made by male mechanics. Adjustment is <strong>of</strong>ten needed to make it suitable for women<br />

farmers due to their body size, physical strength and limited experiences <strong>of</strong> using them.<br />

Women do the most tedious and back-breaking tasks in agriculture, animal husbandry and at<br />

homes. Their contribution is very high in farm sector as they are involved in most <strong>of</strong> the farm<br />

operations and are, therefore, subjected to extra harsh conditions <strong>of</strong> work that lead to drudgery.<br />

It is generally felt that the available agricultural machineries are not women friendly as they<br />

are not designed taking into consideration the women’s ergonomic measurements. There exists<br />

a gap between design engineers and farm planners and the lack <strong>of</strong> women’s access to articulate<br />

their felt needs. The result is that the women farmers must carry out various field operations<br />

with the age-old hand tools or with their hands. The posture adopted during these operations<br />

are not proper and lead to occupational health problems if not given due attention. It is thus<br />

essential that the tools and implements for farm women are developed to suit their body<br />

posture. In this direction, several agricultural implements and hand tools suitable for farm<br />

women have been developed by various Institutes under ICAR. These gender-friendly tools are<br />

required to be promoted and popularized among the farm women on a massive scale and these<br />

tools are- Twin wheel hoe, paddy thresher, stalk puller, Milking stand& stool and so many with<br />

the help <strong>of</strong> these tools they save their time, improve work efficiency and prove as a source <strong>of</strong><br />

income. The Central government is continuously working to strengthen the financial security<br />

<strong>of</strong> farmers. Therefore, the government has released funds to different states for various<br />

activities <strong>of</strong> farm mechanization. These include the establishment <strong>of</strong> custom hiring centers,<br />

farm machinery banks, high-tech hubs and distribution <strong>of</strong> various agricultural machinery.<br />

Methodology<br />

A lot <strong>of</strong> improved machines are promoted for different agriculture operations in the country,<br />

but all the machines are not suited to hilly geography <strong>of</strong> Narmada district. After all assessments,<br />

some <strong>of</strong> the improved machines are described below which can be opted for this region in terms<br />

<strong>of</strong> work efficiency improvement, KVK (Narmada, NAU) has taken one step ahead developed<br />

a concept on reach tool center at village level with in 7 villages with set <strong>of</strong> 7 tools like as- 1.<br />

787 | Page Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Twin wheel hoe, 2. Rack 3. De-Topping 4. Winnowing fan 5. Paddy thresher 6. stalk puller 7.<br />

Spiral grader. These tools are helpful to save time, save money, save land, manage their health,<br />

more efficient, effective and environmentally friendly. On reach tool center can be a boon for<br />

small farmers & farming community and helps them cope up with the shortage <strong>of</strong> labor and<br />

improve farm efficiency in terms <strong>of</strong> 70 to 80%.<br />

Possible Interventions:<br />

Weeding equipment/tools: Hand weeding has traditionally been the most common weed<br />

management practice in Narmada. However, because <strong>of</strong> rising labor scarcity at critical time <strong>of</strong><br />

weed control, hand weeding is either delayed or insufficient, exacerbating losses. The<br />

introduction <strong>of</strong> new, effective and cheaper molecules has <strong>of</strong>fered the farmers adoption <strong>of</strong><br />

herbicide-based weed control, which is likely to increase in future. Battery-operated sprayer<br />

fitted with 3-nozzle boom is an option that can increase herbicide use efficiency. Much more<br />

uniform coverage is obtained from using a multiple-nozzle boom sprayer than a single nozzle.<br />

Mechanical weeding can also be opted as an appropriate weed control measure. Therefore,<br />

Twin wheel hoe weeder operating between a row spacing <strong>of</strong> 25-30 cm, and taking 7-8 hours<br />

for weeding one-hectare area, can be recommended.<br />

Paddy thresher: Now-a-days motor operated paddy thresher used in Narmada district. Grains<br />

are generally separated out with the combining and hammering actions <strong>of</strong> threshing teeth.<br />

Now the motor operated paddy threshers are available in improved versions and also available<br />

with the diesel engines having an additional winnowing fan. This type <strong>of</strong> machine is safer,<br />

women-friendly, more efficient which can solve the problems <strong>of</strong> labour, time and cost. Use<br />

<strong>of</strong> this machine for custom hiring can be an alternate source <strong>of</strong> earning for increasing their<br />

family income.<br />

Stalk puller: In Narmada district main farmers growing crops like pigeon pea & cotton. Stalk<br />

<strong>of</strong> these plants is not easy to pull out. The plant stalk puller is very convenient and efficient<br />

hand tool for pulling out the stalk with roots by the help <strong>of</strong> long ever handle.<br />

Conclusion<br />

The dominance <strong>of</strong> small and marginal holdings in Narmada district farmers major focus on<br />

development and designing <strong>of</strong> scale-neutral machinery suited to different geographical<br />

terrains. Facilitating the farmers and train them on above-said machines will help in their<br />

adoption at large scale and make a viable economic case for new mechanized sustainable<br />

intensification (SI) technologies in farming sector . The day-to-day hiring <strong>of</strong> machines on a<br />

rental basis would be a better option for small and marginal farmers <strong>of</strong> Narmada district.<br />

Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment<br />

788 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

T5-41P-1616<br />

Predicting the Generation Index <strong>of</strong> Groundnut Bruchid, Caryedon Serratus<br />

Olivier in India during Future Climate CHANGE scenario<br />

T.V. Prasad *, M. Srinivasa Rao, Y. Muttapa, G. Navya and V.K. Singh<br />

ICAR-Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture (CRIDA), Hyderabad-500 059, India<br />

*tvprasad72@gmail.com<br />

Groundnut bruchid, Caryedon serratus Olivier (Bruchidae: Coleoptera) is a primary insect pest<br />

<strong>of</strong> groundnut in storage causing both quantitative and qualitative losses. Beetle damage not<br />

only reduces the weight, nutritive value and affects the quality <strong>of</strong> seed and oil. Extent <strong>of</strong> damage<br />

(weight loss) caused by bruchid in shelled and unshelled groundnut is about 70 and 80 per cent,<br />

respectively (Sreedhar et al., 2020). To develop any pest management programme for a specific<br />

agro-ecosystem, information on abundance and distribution <strong>of</strong> pest in relation to weather<br />

parameters is a basic requirement. The ability <strong>of</strong> an insect to develop at different temperatures<br />

is an important adaptation to survive in various climatic conditions, and its understanding is<br />

important for predicting pest outbreaks. The pest forecasting models facilitate better<br />

preparedness to combat outbreaks <strong>of</strong> serious insect pests by developing effective pest<br />

management strategies well in advance. The Insect Life Cycle Modelling (ILCYM) s<strong>of</strong>tware<br />

(version 3.0) developed by the International Potato Centre, (Tonnang et al., 2013) has been<br />

used to predict climatically suitable areas for distribution, abundance and damage activity, and<br />

to examine the impact <strong>of</strong> climate change on future pest status <strong>of</strong> insects <strong>of</strong> economically<br />

important crops. With this background we aimed to study the generation index <strong>of</strong> C. serratus,<br />

to predict its number <strong>of</strong> generations per year in different agroecological regions <strong>of</strong> India due to<br />

future changes temperature conditions and further simulation data generated from ILCYM<br />

s<strong>of</strong>tware were adopted for development <strong>of</strong> future pest risk maps using ArcGIS environment.<br />

Methodology<br />

Experiments on life tables were conducted at six constant temperatures (15, 20, 25, 27, 30 and<br />

35 o C) and on fluctuating temperature environment inside the growth chambers and the data<br />

obtained from these experiments was used to develop temperature-dependent phenology model<br />

for C. serratus. Third module <strong>of</strong> ILCYM “potential population analysis and mapping” was<br />

used for developing pest risk maps. Using simulated life table parameters and climatic data<br />

(temperature), we projected generation index (GI) <strong>of</strong> C. serratus for present and future time<br />

period (year 2050). The generated ASCII files <strong>of</strong> GI from ILCYM for present and future<br />

predictions were imported in to ArcGIS and converted into a polygon-based classified georeferenced<br />

data set under different risk levels <strong>of</strong> C. serratus in India. The GI (value ranges from<br />

1 to 3.45) used for identification <strong>of</strong> the region where insect pest having number <strong>of</strong> generations<br />

789 | Page Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

per year. More details about ILCYM and computation <strong>of</strong> various risk indices including GI are<br />

available in Prasad et al., 2021.<br />

Results<br />

The total number <strong>of</strong> generations that can be completed by C. serratus in a year in India was<br />

visualized using ArcGIS for current (baseline worldclim climate data for the year 2000) and<br />

future projections based on the ensemble <strong>of</strong> eight GCMs (year 2050) (Fig. 1). The generation<br />

indices are directly correlated with the abundance and potential infestation <strong>of</strong> C. serratus under<br />

stored conditions. Ensemble model has predicted 3-3.46 generations <strong>of</strong> C. serratus in a year in<br />

a major part <strong>of</strong> India. The Himalayan region area and its ranges from north to north-eastern<br />

regions are predicted to have 1-2.14 generations in a year under current climatic conditions.<br />

Under future climate change scenarios (2050), maximum regions <strong>of</strong> India, except Northern<br />

Himalayan and top <strong>of</strong> north-eastern states, are predicted with more than three generations <strong>of</strong><br />

C. serratus in a year. In the present study, the model outputs represent only the potential<br />

population growth parameters for C. serratus in a given agro-ecological region. Thus, it needs<br />

to be cautiously interpreted while predicting stored dynamics and abundance <strong>of</strong> C. serratus<br />

population, where abiotic and biotic factors other than temperature do come to play the role in<br />

regulating pest population dynamics. The present results indicate that temperature is vital in<br />

influencing the growth and life table parameters <strong>of</strong> C. serratus and this pest incidence is likely<br />

to be higher in the future climate change periods in India.<br />

Change in generation index (GI) <strong>of</strong> C. serratus in India for (a) Present and (b) Future (2050).<br />

Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment<br />

790 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Conclusion<br />

Based on present results the number <strong>of</strong> generations that can be completed by C. serratus in a<br />

year in India is likely to be higher in the future climate change periods.<br />

References<br />

Prasad, T. V., Srinivasa Rao, M., Rao, K. V., Bal, S. K., Muttapa, Y., Choudhary, J. S. and<br />

Singh, V. K. 2021. Temperature-based phenology model for predicting the present<br />

and future establishment and distribution <strong>of</strong> recently invasive Spodoptera frugiperda<br />

(J. E. Smith) in India. Bulletin <strong>of</strong> Entomological Research, 1-15.<br />

Sreedhar, M., Singh, D. V., Reddy, D. C. and Vasudha, A. 2020. Biochemical changes in<br />

groundnut pods due to infestation <strong>of</strong> bruchid Caryedon serratus (Olivier) under<br />

stored conditions. Journal <strong>of</strong> Stored Products Research, 88:101678.<br />

Tonnang, E. Z. H., Juarez, H., Carhuapoma, P., Gonzales, J. C., Mendoza, D., Sporleder, M.,<br />

Simon, R. and Kroschel, J. 2013. ILCYM - Insect Life Cycle Modeling. A s<strong>of</strong>tware<br />

package for developing temperature-based insect phenology models with<br />

applications for local, regional and global analysis <strong>of</strong> insect population and mapping,<br />

International Potato Center, Lima, Peru. pp 175.<br />

T5-42P-1621<br />

Indian Water Policy: Perspective <strong>of</strong> Rainwater Harvesting for Sustainability in Semi-<br />

Arid Regions<br />

K Sreenivas Reddy*, K Sammi Reddy and V.K Singh<br />

ICAR - Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, Santhoshnagar, Hyderabad,<br />

ks.reddy@icar.gov.in<br />

India is an agrarian country and water is a critical input in agriculture. India has 18% <strong>of</strong> world<br />

population, having 4% <strong>of</strong> world’s fresh water, out <strong>of</strong> which 80% is used in agriculture.<br />

Agriculture farming is two type rainfed and irrigated. Rainfed agriculture is practiced 80% in<br />

worldwide and contributed 70% in global food production (UNCTAD, 2011). India has about<br />

141 million ha <strong>of</strong> net cultivable area. Out <strong>of</strong> which 72 Mha (51%) net sown areas dependent<br />

on rain, and plays an important role in the country’s economy. This area accounts for nearly<br />

40 % <strong>of</strong> the total food<br />

production contributed by 80% marginal and small farmers. (Reddy et al, 2020 and DAFW,<br />

2022).The constraints like water scarcity, soil degradation, low soil fertility, low farm<br />

mechanization, low risk bearing capacity <strong>of</strong> farmers, climate change and lack <strong>of</strong> interest from<br />

private sector to invest into agriculture due to its unreliable nature, which results in very low<br />

crop productivity (0.8 to 1 t/ha)or crop failures are always concern for success <strong>of</strong> agriculture<br />

791 | Page Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

in the rainfed area. If these constraints are addressed, these areas have tremendous potential to<br />

contribute a larger share in food production and faster agricultural growth compared to the<br />

irrigated areas (Reddy et al., 2020).<br />

Targeting smallholder farmers particularly in rainfed areas and irrigated areas, <strong>of</strong>fers the best<br />

chance for reducing poverty quickly in developing countries. Small and marginal farmers<br />

constitute 86.25% <strong>of</strong> Indian farmers, 47.38% <strong>of</strong> cultivated land and over 50% <strong>of</strong> the<br />

total agricultural production is vital for not only achieving Indian agrarian economy, but also<br />

for alleviating hungry and poverty (Singh et al, 2022). Most <strong>of</strong> the small and marginal farming<br />

is rain dependent covering the SAT region in the country. They are affected by the recent trends<br />

<strong>of</strong> climate change impacts <strong>of</strong> increased frequency <strong>of</strong> droughts, floods, high rainfall intensities,<br />

increased temperatures combined with shifts in markets and prices. Moreover, these farm lands<br />

are degraded due to soil erosion making the soil unproductive and unsustainable for nutrients<br />

storage, organic carbon and other soil microorganisms useful for the plants. To make these<br />

grey lands into productive lands, a long-term strategy for addressing the weather aberrations,<br />

long dryspells, water conservation and rainwater harvesting are the key for making them green<br />

with sustainable yields, increased crop productivity by adopting efficient water management<br />

techniques for conservation <strong>of</strong> both green and blue water. Also these lands contribute 40% <strong>of</strong><br />

agricultural production with nutrious cereals, oil seeds and pulses besides other cotton and<br />

commercial crops.<br />

Since rainfed farming is rain dependent, better management <strong>of</strong> rainwater, soil moisture, and<br />

critical irrigation are the key to helping the greatest number <strong>of</strong> small holders, for three main<br />

reasons: (1) It cuts the yield losses from dry spells (2) It gives farmers the security they need<br />

to risk investing in other inputs such as fertilizers and high-yielding varieties. Farmers dare<br />

not risk the little they have buying inputs for a crop that may fail for lack <strong>of</strong> water and (3) It<br />

allows farmers to grow higher value market crops, such as vegetables or fruits. These are more<br />

sensitive to water stress and require costlier inputs. Improving agricultural productivity in<br />

areas that depend on rainfall has the greatest potential to reduce poverty and hunger, in large<br />

parts <strong>of</strong> Asia. Current yields in many rainfed settings are low and improving rainfed farming<br />

could double or quadruple yields. Such yields “gaps” are greatest for maize, sorghum, and<br />

millet and closing these gaps promises huge social, economic, and environmental paybacks<br />

(CAWMA, 2007).<br />

India receives an average <strong>of</strong> 3,000 billion cubic meters (BCM) <strong>of</strong> rainfall every year. It has<br />

been estimated that the average surface run<strong>of</strong>f (SRO) is about 1869 BCM, out <strong>of</strong> which the<br />

utilizable surface water available is 690 BCM, and ground water available is 433 BCM. An<br />

additional 200 BCM is available through interlinking <strong>of</strong> rivers in different regions <strong>of</strong> India.<br />

From the water balance <strong>of</strong> India’s water resources, the SRO contributing to oceans is 491<br />

BCM after meeting the requirement <strong>of</strong> environmental flows <strong>of</strong> 55 BCM (10% maximum)<br />

Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment<br />

792 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

which can be harvested for conservation <strong>of</strong> water and increase crop yield through proper<br />

integrated water policy.<br />

The National water policy broadly describes the water allocations and utilization patterns for<br />

major sectors <strong>of</strong> Agriculture, Industries, Domestic and environment. National Water Policy<br />

(NWP, 2012) currently in force was drafted in 2012 and is the third such policy since 1987.<br />

The NWP 2012 policy was the concept <strong>of</strong> an Integrated Water Resources Management<br />

approach that took the “river basin/ sub-basin” as a unit for planning, development and<br />

management <strong>of</strong> water resources. It states that the land, soil, energy and water management<br />

with scientific inputs should be used to evolve different agricultural strategies and improve<br />

soil and water productivity to manage droughts. Integrated farming systems and nonagricultural<br />

developments may also be considered for livelihood support and poverty<br />

alleviation. Policy intervention is also made facilitating relaxation in project clearances,<br />

funding etc. for drought-prone areas. However, so far in the country, the rainfed agriculture is<br />

neglected or not that much focused in the national policy document which basically contributes<br />

to the generation <strong>of</strong> maximum run<strong>of</strong>f potential to the storage from different river basins <strong>of</strong> the<br />

country. These rainfed grey lands suffer from extreme rainfall deficits, high intense rainfall<br />

with soil degradation through erosion, long dryspells, but contribute to 80% <strong>of</strong> the production<br />

<strong>of</strong> pulses, oilseeds and coarse cereals. Hence, it is necessary to rethink <strong>of</strong> or policy with proper<br />

allocations <strong>of</strong> green and blue water in terms <strong>of</strong> On-farm rainwater harvesting and water<br />

conservation technologies which are proved cost effective. The rainfed region is characterized<br />

into three major groups based on average annual rainfall (AAR) <strong>of</strong> low (500 – 750 mm),<br />

Medium (750-1200mm) and high (>1200mm). The areal distributions <strong>of</strong> rainfed area are<br />

22Mha, 27Mha and 23Mha in the above group <strong>of</strong> AAR across the different river basins <strong>of</strong> the<br />

country.<br />

Policymakers need to focus on both design and development <strong>of</strong> water resources infrastructure<br />

from a multiple-use system perspective. By doing so they can maximize the benefits per unit<br />

<strong>of</strong> water ensuring water security. Multiple-use systems for domestic use, crop production,<br />

aquaculture, agr<strong>of</strong>orestry, and livestock effectively improve water productivity and reduce<br />

poverty. The contributions to livelihoods, especially for poor households, <strong>of</strong> these multiple uses<br />

are substantial. As per GOI directives, it is not only Per drop more crop but also more nutrition<br />

per drop for food security in rainfed regions. The present paper deals with the perspectives <strong>of</strong><br />

rainwater harvesting, water conservation and its investments for converting these low<br />

productivity drylands into high productivity green lands in the country for the consideration<br />

<strong>of</strong> national water policy.<br />

793 | Page Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment


Theme– 6<br />

Institutional and policy innovations for<br />

accelerated and enhanced impacts


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Theme –6: Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and<br />

enhanced impacts<br />

List <strong>of</strong> <strong>Extended</strong> Summaries<br />

Sr.<br />

No.<br />

Title First Author ID<br />

1 Agrometeorological Interventions for Enhancing<br />

Farmers’ Income in The Drylands <strong>of</strong> South Interior<br />

Karnataka<br />

2 Assessing the Climate Resilience <strong>of</strong> Agricultural<br />

Development Pathways: Framework and<br />

Application<br />

3 Promoting Water Stewardship for Improving<br />

Water Governance in Groundwater Dependent<br />

Regions<br />

4 Agricultural Drought and Its Impact on Pod Yield<br />

<strong>of</strong> Rainfed Groundnut in Scarce Rainfall Zone <strong>of</strong><br />

Andhra Pradesh<br />

5 An Impact Assessment <strong>of</strong> Agromet Advisory<br />

Service (Aas) For Sustainable Agriculture and<br />

Resilient Farm Income: Study <strong>of</strong> Farm precise<br />

Mobile Application<br />

6 Institutional Interventions for Enhancing<br />

Productivity in Rainfed Agriculture<br />

7 Perceived Attributes Leading to The Adoption <strong>of</strong><br />

Agromet Advisories by Dryland Farmers in India<br />

8 Assessment <strong>of</strong> Pr<strong>of</strong>itability and Sustainability <strong>of</strong><br />

Sunflower as A Component in Emerging Cropping<br />

Systems <strong>of</strong> Northern Karnataka<br />

9 Integrated Farming System: A Scientific Approach<br />

Towards Doubling Farmers Income<br />

10 Impact <strong>of</strong> Cluster Folds in Groundnut Productivity<br />

Enhancement Under Rainfed Alfisols <strong>of</strong> YSR<br />

District, Andhra Pradesh<br />

11 Drought Mitigation <strong>of</strong> Sorghum by Spraying <strong>of</strong><br />

Foliar Nutrients on Yield and Economics Under<br />

Dryspell Situation for Southern Agroclimatic Zone<br />

<strong>of</strong> Tamil Nadu<br />

12 A Summative Evaluation <strong>of</strong> Technological<br />

Interventions in Poultry Farming<br />

13 Strengthening Smallholder Agriculture in Rainfed<br />

Areas: Livelihood Analysis <strong>of</strong> Pigeonpea Growing<br />

Farmers <strong>of</strong> Telangana State<br />

14 Institutional Innovations for Accelerating<br />

Technology Transfer: CRIDA’s Experiences<br />

Thimmegowda<br />

Arjuna Srinidhi<br />

Eshwer Kale<br />

Malleswari<br />

Sadhineni<br />

Nikhil Nikam<br />

Anshida Beevi<br />

Jagriti Rohit<br />

MR Umesh<br />

Keshav Mehra<br />

DV Srinivasulu<br />

K Baskar<br />

Prabhat Kumar<br />

Pankaj<br />

G Nirmala<br />

CA Rama Rao<br />

T6-01O-107<br />

T6-02O-1174<br />

T6-03O-1132<br />

T6-04O-1423<br />

T6-05R-1195<br />

T6-06R-1237<br />

T6-07R-1214<br />

T6-08R-1518<br />

T6-09R-1359<br />

T6-10R-1177<br />

T6-11P-1004<br />

T6-12P-1018<br />

T6-13P-1025<br />

T6-14P-1026<br />

Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts<br />

794 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Sr.<br />

No.<br />

15 Need for more flexibility in crop insurance scheme<br />

(PMFBY)<br />

16 Performance and Economic Evaluation <strong>of</strong> Agri-<br />

Horti System Under Rainfed Condition <strong>of</strong><br />

Marathwada Region<br />

17 Impact <strong>of</strong> Agricultural Extension in Managing<br />

Biotic and Abiotic Stress in Rainfed Areas<br />

18 Assessment <strong>of</strong> Cluster Front Line Demonstration<br />

(Cfld) On Green Gram (Vigna Radiata L. Wildzek)<br />

As A Climate Resilient Intervention in Rainfed<br />

Uplands Of Red & Lateritic Tracts <strong>of</strong> Purulia,<br />

West Bengal, India During Kharif Season.<br />

19 Computation <strong>of</strong> Extension Effectiveness Index and<br />

Effective Extension Approaches for Adoption <strong>of</strong><br />

Rainfed Technologies By Farmers from State<br />

Dept. Of Agriculture, Ngo and Private Extension<br />

Agency in Anantapuramu District <strong>of</strong> A.P.<br />

20 Performance <strong>of</strong> Frontline Demonstrations in Yield<br />

Enhancement <strong>of</strong> Cotton Under Arid Conditions<br />

21 Sustainable Growth in Agriculture Sector: A Case<br />

Study <strong>of</strong> Nalgonda District, Telangana State, India<br />

22 On Farm Evaluation <strong>of</strong> Farming System Modules<br />

for Improving the Pr<strong>of</strong>itability <strong>of</strong> Small and<br />

Marginal Farmers<br />

23 Evaluation <strong>of</strong> Suitable Cropping Sequence for Dry<br />

Tracts in Prakasam District <strong>of</strong> Andhra Pradesh<br />

24 Dynamics <strong>of</strong> Agricultural Land Use in Kerala - A<br />

Socio-Ecological Perspective<br />

25 Socio-Economic Pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> Farmers <strong>of</strong> North<br />

Alluvial Plane <strong>of</strong> Bihar<br />

26 Organizational Dynamics <strong>of</strong> Fpcs For Good<br />

Management<br />

27 Identification <strong>of</strong> Suitable Varieties and Dates <strong>of</strong><br />

Sowing in Cowpea for Prakasam District<br />

28 Influence <strong>of</strong> Foliar Application <strong>of</strong> Potassium<br />

Nitrate on Yield and Economics <strong>of</strong> Soybean Under<br />

Rainfed Conditions <strong>of</strong> Vidarbha<br />

29 Impact <strong>of</strong> Cluster Front Line Demonstrations on<br />

Productivity and Pr<strong>of</strong>itability <strong>of</strong> Mung Bean<br />

(Vigna Radiata L.) Var. Ipm-02-3 And Mh-421 In<br />

Churu District <strong>of</strong> Rajasthan<br />

30 Effect <strong>of</strong> Time <strong>of</strong> Application and Different Foliar<br />

Sprays on Yield and Economics <strong>of</strong> Cotton<br />

Title First Author ID<br />

A Amarendar<br />

Reddy<br />

AS Gunjkar<br />

VP Suryavanshi<br />

A Chakraborty<br />

K Ravi Shankar<br />

Arvind Singh<br />

Tetarwal<br />

Harish Balduri<br />

YD Charjan<br />

Rajesh Chowdary<br />

Rose Mathews<br />

Amrendra Kumar<br />

Akhil Ajith<br />

S Bharathi<br />

MM Ganvir<br />

Harish Kumar<br />

Rachhoiya<br />

AB Chorey<br />

T6-15P-1673<br />

T6-16P-1053<br />

T6-17P-1074<br />

T6-18P-1079<br />

T6-19P-1092<br />

T6-20P-1118<br />

T6-21P-1138<br />

T6-22P-1164<br />

T6-23P-1182<br />

T6-24P-1200<br />

T6-25P-1204<br />

T6-26P-1209<br />

T6-27P-1236<br />

T6-28P-1246<br />

T6-29P-1254<br />

T6-30P-1269<br />

795 | Page Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Sr.<br />

No.<br />

31 Production Potential & Economic Feasibility <strong>of</strong><br />

Pigeon Pea Base Intercropping System in Scarcity<br />

Zone <strong>of</strong> Maharashtra<br />

32 Decomposition <strong>of</strong> Agricultural Growth by Sources<br />

in Andhra Pradesh<br />

Title First Author ID<br />

K Kathmaley<br />

G Samba<br />

Shiva<br />

T6-31P-1274<br />

T6-32P-1306<br />

33 Diversification in Agriculture Boon for Farmers. UN Umesh T6-33P-1312<br />

34 Capacity Needs Assessment for Integrating<br />

Nutrition Objectives into Extension Advisory<br />

Service (Eas) Programs<br />

35 Studies on Productivity and Economics <strong>of</strong><br />

Different Maize Based Intercropping Systems<br />

Under Rainfed Conditions <strong>of</strong> Jammu<br />

36 Integration <strong>of</strong> Millet Crops in Rice Fallow Ecology<br />

for System Intensification<br />

37 Impact <strong>of</strong> Millets Consumption Pattern on<br />

Lifestyle Diseases <strong>of</strong> The Tribal and Urban<br />

Population, Telangana<br />

38 Awareness <strong>of</strong> Natural Resource Management<br />

Among Farm Women<br />

39 Impact <strong>of</strong> NICRA Project Through Analysis <strong>of</strong><br />

Different Success Point<br />

40 Intercropping with Sugarcane for Dfi In Eastern<br />

Uttar Pradesh<br />

41 Agricultural Market Intelligence Center -<br />

Forecasting <strong>of</strong> Redgram Prices in Telangana State<br />

by Arimax<br />

42 Additional Income Through Cultivation <strong>of</strong><br />

Redgram On Paddy Field Bunds<br />

43 Impact <strong>of</strong> Frontline Demonstrations on Yield <strong>of</strong><br />

Wheat (Triticum Aestivum) Under NICRA<br />

Villages <strong>of</strong> District Jhansi U.P.<br />

44 Impact Assessment on Yield and Economics <strong>of</strong><br />

Improved Varieties <strong>of</strong> Pea (Pisum Sativum L.)<br />

Through Technology Demonstration in NICRA<br />

Villages <strong>of</strong> Tehri Garhwal, Uttarakhand<br />

45 Impact <strong>of</strong> Weather Based Agro-Advisory Services<br />

on Upliftment <strong>of</strong> Farming Communities <strong>of</strong><br />

Ramanathapuram District, Tamil Nadu<br />

46 Importance <strong>of</strong> Solar Light Trap in Integrated Pest<br />

Management<br />

47 Impact <strong>of</strong> Residual Soil Moisture on Yields and<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>itability <strong>of</strong> Rainfed Cropping Sequences<br />

Veenita Kumari<br />

AP Singh<br />

U Triveni<br />

J Shirisha<br />

SG Puri<br />

Rajiv Kumar<br />

Ashok Rai<br />

R Vijaya Kumari<br />

S Neelaveni<br />

Adesh Kumar<br />

G Alok<br />

M Vengateswari<br />

Manoj Kumar<br />

Ahirwar<br />

ML Jadav<br />

T6-34P-1320<br />

T6-35P-1326<br />

T6-36P-1376<br />

T6-37P-1386<br />

T6-38P-1391<br />

T6-39P-1436<br />

T6-40P-1441<br />

T6-41P-1451<br />

T6-42P-1458<br />

T6-43P-1500<br />

T6-44P-1502<br />

T6-45P-1541<br />

T6-46P-1556<br />

T6-47P-1560<br />

Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts<br />

796 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Sr.<br />

No.<br />

48 Technology Need Assessment <strong>of</strong> Cool Season<br />

Vegetable Growers in Kerala<br />

49 Realizing Better Yield and Returns <strong>of</strong> Chickpea<br />

Crop Through Cluster Frontline Demonstrations<br />

50 Achieving Fodder self-sufficiency using Natural<br />

Farming Methods and Community Action in a<br />

Rainfed Region: The case <strong>of</strong> Ayyavaripalli<br />

Village, India<br />

51 Enhancement <strong>of</strong> Yield and Economic indices by<br />

the adoption <strong>of</strong> cotton + redgram intercropping<br />

syatem inder rainfed conditions <strong>of</strong> Mancherial<br />

District, Telangana State<br />

52 Crop diversification with castor crop for<br />

maximizing productivity and pr<strong>of</strong>itability in<br />

Ananthapuramu district <strong>of</strong> Andhra Pradesh<br />

53 Institutional Interventions for Climate Risk<br />

Management<br />

Title First Author ID<br />

Alaka s Balan<br />

Ramesh Kumar<br />

U Sudhakar<br />

I Thirupathi<br />

G Sashikala<br />

K Nagasree<br />

T6-48P-1623<br />

T6-49P<br />

T6-50P-1146<br />

T6-51P-1277<br />

T6-52P-1515<br />

T6-53P-1668<br />

797 | Page Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

T6-01O-1076<br />

Agrometeorological Interventions for Enhancing Farmers’ Income in the<br />

Drylands <strong>of</strong> South Interior Karnataka<br />

M. N. Thimmegowda*, M. H. Manjunatha, Lingaraj Huggi, L. Nagesha and<br />

D. V. Soumya<br />

AICRP on Agrometeorology, UAS, GKVK, Bengaluru560065, Karnataka, India<br />

* mnthimmegowda@gmail.com<br />

In developing countries like India, ensuring food security to growing population is the main<br />

challenge in the face <strong>of</strong> changing climate. Inter and intra-annual variability in climate impacts<br />

agricultural production. Among several methods to overcome such ill impacts <strong>of</strong> climate on<br />

agriculture, forecasting and educating the farmers about possible upcoming variability in the<br />

regional climate is one. In this direction, agromet advisory services were issued to farmers in<br />

four districts, viz., Bangalore urban & rural, Kolar and Chikkaballapur, in the dryland regions<br />

<strong>of</strong> south interior Karnataka using Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs) and<br />

their effect on crop productivity was studied.<br />

Methodology<br />

AICRP on Agrometeorology, University <strong>of</strong> Agricultural Sciences, Bangalore is playing a major<br />

role in communicating the weather information to farmers through Gramin Krishi Mausam<br />

Sewa (GKMS), funded by India Meteorological Department (IMD) and National Innovations<br />

in Climate Resilient Agriculture (NICRA) <strong>of</strong> Indian Council <strong>of</strong> Agricultural Research. The<br />

forecasts issued by IMD are used to inform farmers about the forthcoming weather vagaries<br />

and necessary actions to be taken to minimize or avoid crop losses. The utility <strong>of</strong> weather<br />

forecast depends upon their reliability and applicability at micro level (Singh et al. 2004). We<br />

assessed the reliability <strong>of</strong> forecasts issued by IMD and evaluate the cost economics <strong>of</strong><br />

implementation <strong>of</strong> agromet advisory.<br />

Study area and agromet information shared: Four dry farming districts in the south interior<br />

Karnataka were selected for the study, viz., Bangalore urban & rural, Kolar and Chikkaballapur<br />

to share the weather information twice a week based on IMD’s forecast. The districts differed<br />

with respect to the annual and seasonal rainfall distribution, Bangalore Urban received an<br />

annual rainfall <strong>of</strong> 854.6 mm, <strong>of</strong> which 460.1 mm received in South-west monsoon (SWM) and<br />

233.7 mm in North-East Monsoon (NEM). Bangalore rural received a normal annual rainfall<br />

<strong>of</strong> 809.2 mm out <strong>of</strong> which 440.7 mm in SWM and 228.9 mm in NEM. Chikkaballapur receives<br />

a normal annual rainfall <strong>of</strong> 731.3 mm divided into 399.8 mm in SWM and 222.2 mm in NEM.<br />

Kolar, being an eastern most dry district, receives 746.4 mm annual rainfall <strong>of</strong> which 386.8<br />

mm received in SWM and 236.3 mm in NEM (Sanjeevaiahet al. 2021). This variability in the,<br />

Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts<br />

798 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

annual and seasonal rainfall has caused the variations in the crop productivity in the regions,<br />

making it necessary to take weather-based crop management practices (Shivaramu et al. 2022).<br />

Preparation process <strong>of</strong> agro-advisories: Based on the forecasts received on rainfall,<br />

temperature, wind speed, humidity and cloud cover from IMD and state met centres, the<br />

probable impacts on the crops or cropping systems in the districts was discussed with the<br />

scientists belonging to respective discipline.<br />

The major crops and cropping systems in the region are field crops like finger millet, maize,<br />

vegetable crops like cabbage, leafy vegetables, etc. and fruit crops like grapes and flower crops like<br />

rose, marigold, chrysanthemum, etc. Most <strong>of</strong> these crops are <strong>of</strong> short duration and yields are<br />

sensitive to even minor climatic aberration. Based on the consultations with relevant experts,<br />

advisories for reducing the crop losses are sent directly to farmers’ mobile through WhatsApp and<br />

are also displayed at community centres so that the information reaches individual farmer.<br />

Assessment <strong>of</strong> impact: A comparison <strong>of</strong> farmers who received the advisories (AAS farmer) with<br />

those who did not (non-AAS farmer) was made with respect to various parameters. The cost <strong>of</strong><br />

cultivation, gross income, net income and benefit cost ratio <strong>of</strong> these farmers was calculated per<br />

annum, and averaged for multi-year impact assessment.<br />

District Parameters Rainfall (mm) Maximum (°C) Minimum (°C)<br />

Bengaluru rural<br />

Bengaluru Urban<br />

Kolar<br />

Chikkaballapur<br />

Wind speed<br />

(km/hr)<br />

Obs.* 366 366 366 366<br />

Correct 144(39) 162(44) 128(35) 89(24)<br />

incorrect 212(58) 97(27) 108(29) 195(53)<br />

Obs.* 366 366 366 366<br />

Correct 150(54) 166(45) 129(35) 94(26)<br />

Not usable 196(5) 94(26) 112(31) 194(53)<br />

Obs.* 360 360 360 360<br />

Correct 146(41) 158(44) 244(68) 151(42)<br />

Not usable 200(56) 102(28) 28(8) 116(32)<br />

Obs.* 362 362 362 362<br />

Correct 161(44) 163(45) 250(69) 173(48)<br />

Not usable 193(53) 100(28) 27(7) 123(34)<br />

799 | Page Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

*Total number <strong>of</strong> advisories sent. Numbers in parentheses indicate percent success/failure <strong>of</strong><br />

forecast.<br />

Results<br />

Usability <strong>of</strong> forecasts: The advisories based on rainfall were least usable (39, 54, 41 and 44%<br />

in Bengaluru rural, Bengaluru urban, Kolar and Chikkaballapur, respectively) mainly due to<br />

weak agreement <strong>of</strong> forecast rainfall with actual. The agreement between forecast and observed<br />

maximum temperature was 24, 26, 42 and 48% in Bengaluru rural, Bengaluru urban, Kolar and<br />

Chikkaballapur, respectively. The forecasted minimum temperature had 35, 35, 68 and 69%<br />

agreement with observed. And, forecasted wind speed had 24, 26, 42 and 48% agreement with<br />

the observed wind speed. This dissimilarity between the observed and forecasted weather<br />

parameters indicate the need for improving forecasts for precise agromet advisory issue.<br />

Though there was a moderate similarity between forecasts and observed weather parameters,<br />

the advisories on crop management were issued and the impact <strong>of</strong> issued advisories were<br />

assessed using BC ratio. The farmers receiving advisory (AASF) compared to those not<br />

receiving advisory (non-AASF) received more incomes reflected in in BC ratios <strong>of</strong> AASFs<br />

(2.0, 2.7, 1.6 and 2.8 in field, vegetable, flower and fruit crops, respectively) as compared to<br />

non-AASF (1.6, 1.7, 1.3 and 1.7 in field, vegetable, flower and fruit crops, respectively). Thus<br />

it is evident that weather forecasts and their better usability upon proper dissemination <strong>of</strong><br />

information helped improve farm incomes in the drylands <strong>of</strong> Sothern Interior Karnataka.<br />

Conclusion<br />

The outcome <strong>of</strong> the study showed the poor accuracy <strong>of</strong> forecasted rainfall, though the forecastbased<br />

crop management advices resulted in improved crop productivity through timely<br />

management and changing crop management practices based on the forecasts given. This<br />

stresses the role <strong>of</strong> meteorological institutions in securing higher crop productivity.<br />

Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts<br />

800 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

References<br />

Singh, S., Rao, V.U.M. and Singh, D. 2004. Scientific support in farm decision making through<br />

weather based advisory services in Haryana, J. Agrometeorology, 6, 265-267.<br />

Shivaramu, H. S., Manjunatha, M. H., Huggi, L.,Bal, S. K., Kumar, V. P., Padmashri, H. S.,<br />

Soumya, D. V., Nagesha, L. and Mohanty, M. 2022. Soil moisture induced yield<br />

variability in major crops <strong>of</strong> Karnataka, Indian J. Agric. Sci., 92 (7): 836–41.<br />

Sanjeevaiah, S.H., Rudrappa, K.S., Lakshminarasappa, M.T., Huggi, L.,Hanumanthaiah, M.<br />

M., Venkatappa, S. D.; Lingegowda, N. and Sreeman, S.M. 2021. Understanding the<br />

Temporal Variability <strong>of</strong> Rainfall for Estimating Agro-Climatic Onset <strong>of</strong> Cropping Season<br />

over South Interior Karnataka, India. Agronomy, 11, 1135.<br />

T6-02O-1174<br />

Assessing the Climate Resilience <strong>of</strong> Agricultural Development Pathways:<br />

Framework and Application<br />

Arjuna Srinidhi 1,2 , Saskia E. Werners 1,3 , Marcella D’Souza 2 , Fulco Ludwig 1 and<br />

Miranda P.M. Meuwissen 4<br />

1<br />

Water Systems and Global Change Group, Wageningen University & Research<br />

2<br />

Watershed Organisation Trust (WOTR), Pune - Satara Rd, Maharashtra 411009<br />

3<br />

Institute for Environment and Human Security, United Nations University<br />

4 Business Economics Group, Wageningen University & Research.<br />

Semiarid regions in India are characterized by poor natural resources, smallholder farmers, and<br />

an increasing frequency <strong>of</strong> extreme weather events. The vulnerability <strong>of</strong> semiarid farming<br />

systems to climate change and the state <strong>of</strong> agrarian distress in India underscores the need to<br />

assess their climate resilience (Kuchimanchi et al., 2019). Weaknesses in existing resilience<br />

assessment frameworks include a bias towards assessing the status quo, and the lack <strong>of</strong> clarity<br />

between assessing resilience to specific stresses and the more general resilience attributes <strong>of</strong> a<br />

system. The objective <strong>of</strong> our research is to develop a context specific framework to assess the<br />

climate resilience <strong>of</strong> semiarid farming systems in India. Application <strong>of</strong> the framework to two<br />

different farming systems in India help us to generate insights on the contribution <strong>of</strong><br />

agricultural development interventions to the climate resilience <strong>of</strong> farming systems in semiarid<br />

India.<br />

Methodology<br />

To develop a climate resilience assessment framework specific to semiarid regions in India, we<br />

followed a two-stage process. The first stage involved identifying the broad steps and generic<br />

functions, resilience capacities and attributes from existing literature on the resilience <strong>of</strong><br />

801 | Page Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

farming systems. Literature on impact assessment <strong>of</strong> watershed development (WSD)<br />

interventions in India and the local knowledge and experience <strong>of</strong> the research team also<br />

contributed to this first stage. The second stage involved applying the framework in a case<br />

study (CS1) and using the insights generated to refine the context-specific list <strong>of</strong> system<br />

functions, indicators, resilience capacities and attributes. To generate insights on agricultural<br />

interventions and their contribution to climate resilience, we applied the CRISI framework to<br />

assess two different farming systems located in Jalna district, Maharashtra – i) where<br />

interventions aimed at improving agricultural productivity and irrigation infrastructure (CS2);<br />

and ii) where interventions targeted the building <strong>of</strong> adaptative capacities in addition to<br />

improving agricultural productivity (CS3). We also apply a pathways lens by considering the<br />

cumulative effect <strong>of</strong> all agriculture related interventions over 15 years.<br />

Results<br />

The CRISI framework consists <strong>of</strong> the following six steps. These steps are: 1. System<br />

description; 2. Challenges; 3. System functions; 4. Resilience capacities; 5. Resilience<br />

attributes; and 6. Reflection (Table 1). We find that having a river with water availability nearly<br />

all year round, and better irrigation infrastructure, are key to the resilience <strong>of</strong> CS2. On the other<br />

hand, CS3 demonstrates other forms <strong>of</strong> resilience such as better social organisation within the<br />

community and efficient management <strong>of</strong> the limited water resources. We also find a greater<br />

degree <strong>of</strong> ownership and post-project sustainability in CS3. Discussions with stakeholders in<br />

CS3 showed that some <strong>of</strong> this sustainability can be attributed to interventions that had a focus<br />

on the health <strong>of</strong> its ecosystem, monitoring & evaluation <strong>of</strong> activities and the capacity building<br />

interventions, particularly <strong>of</strong> the institutions that were set up, such as the Village Development<br />

Committee and a Farmer Producer Organisation.<br />

No.<br />

CRISI<br />

step<br />

1 System<br />

description<br />

Overview <strong>of</strong> the 6 steps in the CRISI framework<br />

Actions to be taken in the assessment<br />

Understand and describe the context, spatial and time scale, stakeholders, etc<br />

2 Challenges Explore stakeholders’ views <strong>of</strong> environmental (including climate), economic,<br />

social and institutional stresses<br />

3 System<br />

functions<br />

4 Resilience<br />

capacities<br />

Assess the performance <strong>of</strong> indicators related to the following 10 system<br />

functions: 1) Social organisation, 2) Economic viability, 3) Food and nutrition<br />

security, 4) Animal health and welfare, 5) Other bio-based resources, 6) Health<br />

<strong>of</strong> ecosystem, 7) Biodiversity <strong>of</strong> habitat, 8) Attractiveness <strong>of</strong> area, 9) Quality <strong>of</strong><br />

life, 10) Equity (standard <strong>of</strong> living)<br />

Assess the 4 capacities <strong>of</strong> Anticipation, Robustness, Adaptability, &<br />

Transformability by considering the story behind the performance <strong>of</strong> the<br />

indicators (step 3)<br />

Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts<br />

802 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

5 Resilience<br />

attributes<br />

Assess the following 16 resilience attributes:1) Reasonable pr<strong>of</strong>itability, 2)<br />

Social self-organization, 3) Ecological self-regulation, 4) Appropriate<br />

connectedness, 5) Functional diversity, 6) Optimal redundancy, 7) Spatial &<br />

temporal heterogeneity, 8) Exposure to disturbance, 9) Reflectivity & shared<br />

learning, 10) Human capital building, 11) Diverse policies, 12) Infrastructure &<br />

information for innovation, 13) Support for rural life, 14) Access to credit,<br />

insurance & other financial safety nets, 15) Equity (decision making & power<br />

dynamics), 16) Governance arrangements that support transformation<br />

6 Reflection Discuss and reflect on the accuracy <strong>of</strong> assessment, the need for additional<br />

resilience building<br />

Conclusion<br />

We find that CRISI’s inclusiveness in identification <strong>of</strong> stakeholder needs, its systemic<br />

understanding <strong>of</strong> resilience and provision <strong>of</strong> information for decision making make it useful<br />

for the farming community, practitioners and policy makers in assessing and building climate<br />

resilience. Application <strong>of</strong> the CRISI framework shows that agricultural interventions in<br />

semiarid India that primarily focus on improving agriculture productivity and irrigation<br />

infrastructure have a limited influence on the climate resilience. While these are important,<br />

farming systems show much greater climate resilience when interventions are designed to also<br />

address system functions related to the health <strong>of</strong> ecosystem and social organisation, and general<br />

resilience attributes related to diversity, human capital, and governance. Our findings also urge<br />

policy makers and development organisations to include monitoring, evaluation, learning and<br />

adaptive decision making in future interventions. These findings also resonance with a<br />

pathways approach to building future climate resilience. Co-creating such climate resilient<br />

development pathways, particularly for semiarid farming systems in India, would be a valuable<br />

area for further research.<br />

References<br />

Kuchimanchi, B.R., Nazareth, D., Bendapudi, R., Awasthi, S and D’souza, M. 2019. Assessing<br />

differential vulnerability <strong>of</strong> communities in the agrarian context in two districts <strong>of</strong><br />

Maharashtra, India. Climate and Development, 11, 918-929.<br />

T6-03O-1132<br />

Promoting Water Stewardship for Improving Water Governance in<br />

Groundwater Dependent Regions<br />

Eshwer Kale* and Marcella D’Souza<br />

Watershed Organisation Trust (WOTR), Pune, Maharashtra 411009, India<br />

*eshwer.kale@wotr.org.in<br />

Groundwater is the backbone <strong>of</strong> India’s agriculture and drinking water security, as India is the<br />

largest groundwater user in the world. Groundwater supports 84% <strong>of</strong> the country’s net irrigated<br />

803 | Page Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

area and 90% <strong>of</strong> its rural water needs (World Bank, 2010). Rapid changes in land use and land<br />

cover patterns, expanding urbanization, growing population, and changing monsoon patterns<br />

in the wake <strong>of</strong> climate change are putting increasing pressure on our water resources and<br />

exacerbating the water crisis. However, one can see the poor governance <strong>of</strong> this precious<br />

resource at different levels. Although there are ample laws and regulations and a handful <strong>of</strong><br />

success stories <strong>of</strong> community-based water management, as rightly described, India’s water<br />

future is ‘turbulent’ at a large level (Briscoe and Malik, 2006). There is ‘anarchy’ at the<br />

groundwater use and extraction level (Shah, 2009). Therefore, developing and testing<br />

appropriate and feasible solutions for governing the groundwater resource and taking them at<br />

scale is the need <strong>of</strong> the hour. The present paper highlights the lessons learned from action<br />

research designed and implemented in 100 villages <strong>of</strong> Maharashtra by WOTR to improve water<br />

governance at the local level. The action research was designed to understand the enablers and<br />

barriers to promoting appropriate groundwater governance with the aim <strong>of</strong> achieving<br />

community-led responsible water use that is environmentally sustainable, socially judicious,<br />

and economically efficient.<br />

Methodology<br />

Massive data sets were created regarding socio-economic and biophysical assets during pre and<br />

post-interventions and were compared to understand the significance <strong>of</strong> different components<br />

implemented. Also, rich qualitative data was generated through many stakeholder workshops<br />

and case studies. Thus, the systematic process documentation made during the study is used as<br />

an important data source for this paper. The concept <strong>of</strong> water stewardship considers that every<br />

individual has a right to water, and this right comes with a responsibility and accountability to<br />

oneself and the community for the appropriate resource management. Water users are viewed<br />

not as passive beneficiaries or recipients to exploit the resource but as custodians to use and<br />

benefit from it while protecting and managing it for the future. Hence, water resources are<br />

viewed as a public trust rather than a private good. The stewardship approach brings the<br />

different users/stakeholders together on one platform, establishing a dialogue based on<br />

knowledge and information, and arriving at a consensus for the preparation and execution <strong>of</strong><br />

the plan for water management.<br />

Results<br />

The outcomes <strong>of</strong> this effort have been positive and encouraging. At the end <strong>of</strong> the project period,<br />

<strong>of</strong> the 100 villages where WSI (Water Stewardship Initiative) work was carried out, the<br />

performance <strong>of</strong> 46 was satisfactory, that <strong>of</strong> 35 was moderately satisfactory, while 18 villages<br />

have underperformed. All the communities have become aware <strong>of</strong> the causal relationship<br />

between the water crisis facing them and their water usage and management practices. In all<br />

the villages, communities have drawn up water stewardship action plans, and 75% have<br />

Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts<br />

804 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

submitted these to the authorities. People have taken steps small and big, some more and others<br />

less, at both the household and village levels to manage and use water efficiently. Small<br />

behavioral changes with regard to water use are observed at home and in the fields. The number<br />

<strong>of</strong> farmers adopting water-efficient technologies and better farming techniques is increasing<br />

across all villages. Moreover, community contribution and governmental action have increased<br />

water harvesting capacity and availability in all the villages. Motivation and mobilization for<br />

community action have helped to realize these outcomes. The VWMT and the Jal Sevaks played<br />

an important role in sensitizing people and organizing them to undertake water budgeting<br />

practices in the villages and, more importantly, framing the village-level norms and regulations<br />

regarding water use and crop practices (D’Souza et al., 2019).<br />

Conclusion<br />

The WSI has provided valuable experiences and lessons in understanding the complex<br />

relationships and compulsions that influence behaviors that determine access to and use <strong>of</strong><br />

water at the ground level. The project has also highlighted the need to develop an enabling policy<br />

and institutional framework that facilitates and incentivises community and other stakeholders’<br />

participation across society. The project must develop an enabling policy and institutional<br />

framework that enables participation and also these efforts must be accompanied by sustained<br />

and large-scale, multi-format sensitisation campaigns, capacity building and skill upgradation<br />

<strong>of</strong> water users, better governance measures, and the constitution <strong>of</strong> developmental and<br />

regulatory agencies at all levels. In addition, the establishment <strong>of</strong> a mechanism that enforces<br />

related policies and regulations for the common good in a transparent, fair, and consistent<br />

manner is necessary if the culture and practice <strong>of</strong> “water stewardship” are to become a way <strong>of</strong><br />

life. The initiative contributes to the Sustainable Development Goals 6, 12, 13, and 16 and<br />

reduces the overall use <strong>of</strong> natural resources and thus contributes to a low-carbon development<br />

pathway and lessons for operationalizing groundwater management-related policies.<br />

References<br />

Briscoe, J. and Malik, P. 2006. India’s Water Economy: Bracing for a Turbulent Future, Oxford<br />

University Press, New Delhi, India<br />

D’Souza, M., Kale, E., and Pinjan, H. 2019. A Step towards Quenching Rural India’s Thirst,<br />

Experiences and Learnings from the Water Stewardship Initiative in Maharashtra.<br />

Watershed Organisation Trust (WOTR), Pune.<br />

Kale, E., Pinjan, H. and D’Souza, M. 2022. Water Stewardship in Rural India: A How-to<br />

Manual, Watershed Organisation Trust (WOTR), Pune<br />

Shah, T. 2009, ‘Taming the Anarchy: groundwater governance in South Asia’, International<br />

Water Management Institute (IWMI), Colombo, Sri Lanka<br />

805 | Page Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

World Bank. 2010. Deep Wells and Prudence: Towards Pragmatic Action for Addressing<br />

Groundwater Overexploitation in India, The International Bank for Reconstruction<br />

and Development/The World Bank, Washington, D.C, USA<br />

T6-04O-1423<br />

Agricultural Drought and its Impact on Pod Yield <strong>of</strong> Rainfed Groundnut<br />

in Scarce Rainfall Zone <strong>of</strong> Andhra Pradesh<br />

Malleswari Sadhineni 1 , G. Narayana Swamy 1 , K.C. Nataraj 1 , A.V.M Subba Rao 2 and<br />

S.K Bal 2<br />

1 Acharya N.G. Ranga Agricultural University, Andhra Pradesh<br />

2 ICAR-Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, Hyderabad - 500030, Telangana<br />

The major production constraint for rainfed groundnut in scarce rainfall zone <strong>of</strong> Andhra<br />

Pradesh is the limited available soil moisture due to frequent dry spells. In rainfed lands<br />

available soil moisture plays a key role for the growth and yield <strong>of</strong> crops and hence, it is one<br />

<strong>of</strong> the indicators used to study the impact <strong>of</strong> drought on growth and yield <strong>of</strong> rainfed groundnut.<br />

Therefore, the percent available soil moisture (PASM) helps to assess the phenophase-wise<br />

impact <strong>of</strong> agricultural drought on crop yield as one <strong>of</strong> the critical indicators.<br />

Methodology<br />

Agricultural drought and its impact on crop growth and yield <strong>of</strong> groundnut in Ananthapur<br />

district <strong>of</strong> Andhra Pradesh was studied by collecting soil moisture and pod yield from the crop<br />

weather relationship in groundnut experiment conducted during Kharif, 2012 to 2017 (6 years)<br />

under AICRP on Agrometeorology at Agricultural Research Station, Ananthapur. The<br />

groundnut variety K-6 was grown in three sowing environments viz., 1 st FN <strong>of</strong> July, 2 nd FN <strong>of</strong><br />

July and 1 st FN <strong>of</strong> August under rainfed condition on red sandy loam soil. The depth <strong>of</strong> soil in<br />

the experimental site was 60 cm. The soil moisture at field capacity was 71.6 mm and<br />

Permanent wilting point was 18.9 mm. The soil moisture was measured from emergence to<br />

physiological maturity at 0-40 cm depth using Delta-T soil moisture probe at weekly interval<br />

and 24 hours after receiving rainfall.<br />

The Percent Available Soil Moisture (PASM) was derived from the measured soil moisture<br />

data using the formula PASM = ((SMw-PWP)/(FC-PWP)) *100, Where SMw is weekly soil<br />

moisture (vol/vol) for current week, FC is Field capacity <strong>of</strong> soil (Vol/Vol) and PWP is<br />

Permanent Wilting point <strong>of</strong> soil (vol/vol). The calculated PASM values were categorized<br />

phenophase wise into severe drought (25 and <br />

50 and 75) to study the influence <strong>of</strong> PASM on pod yield (kg/ha) <strong>of</strong><br />

groundnut (Anonymous, 2016).<br />

Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts<br />

806 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Results<br />

The weekly PASM values across various phenophases revealed that, crop experienced severe<br />

and moderate drought at all the phenophases <strong>of</strong> crop growth as shown in the table. Crop which<br />

experienced severe drought (6-16% PASM) at all phenophases recorded pod yield <strong>of</strong> 802 kg<br />

ha -1 , moderate drought (33-42% PASM) recorded 1151 kg ha -1 . While, the crop with mild<br />

drought (58-64% PASM) at vegetative, flowering, pegging and pod development stages<br />

produced pod yield <strong>of</strong> 1573 kg ha -1 , the crop with no drought (90-100% PASM) at all the<br />

phenophases recorded 1364 kg ha -1 pod yield. However, the crop did not experience mild<br />

drought at emergence, maturity and no drought at maturity stage.<br />

It was observed that the crop which experienced no drought at pegging recorded lower yield<br />

(1066 kg ha -1 ) compared to one which experienced, moderate drought (1296 kg ha -1 ) and mild<br />

drought (1400 kg ha -1 ). It indicates that the groundnut crop needs moderate to mild drought<br />

conditions (36-64% PASM) for development <strong>of</strong> effective pegs and higher soil moisture (95%<br />

PASM), low moisture (12% PASM) at this stage is detrimental to crop yield. Positive and<br />

significant correlation between soil moisture and pod yield <strong>of</strong> groundnut was also reported by<br />

Guled et al2013).<br />

Severe drought at pod development stage has reduced pod yield (661 kg ha -1 ) compared to<br />

moderate drought (962 kg ha -1 ), mild drought (1435 kg ha -1 ) and no drought has recorded higher<br />

pod yield (1517 kg ha -1 ). This clearly indicates the importance <strong>of</strong> adequate soil moisture at pod<br />

development, which is the most critical phenophase <strong>of</strong> groundnut to harvest higher pod yield<br />

under rainfed situation.<br />

Conclusion<br />

The analysis <strong>of</strong> percent available soil moisture and pod yield <strong>of</strong> groundnut revealed that, the<br />

crop was experiencing moderate drought during crop growth period in most <strong>of</strong> the years. The<br />

effect <strong>of</strong> severe drought was more under late sowing compared to normal sowing during 1 st and<br />

2 nd FN <strong>of</strong> July. The crop subjected to mild drought during the crop growing period irrespective<br />

<strong>of</strong> the sowing environment and phenophases, produced higher pod yield compared to no<br />

drought and moderate drought condition. Moderate to mild drought at pegging and mild or no<br />

drought at pod development are having significant influence on pod yield <strong>of</strong> groundnut crop<br />

grown in Ananthapuramu district <strong>of</strong> Andhra Pradesh.<br />

References<br />

Anonymous. 2016. Manual for drought management. Department <strong>of</strong> Agriculture, Cooperation<br />

& Farmers Welfare, Ministry <strong>of</strong> Agriculture & Farmers Welfare Government <strong>of</strong> India. Pp<br />

37-39.<br />

807 | Page Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Guled, P. M., Shekh, A. M., Patel, H. R. and Pandey V. 2013. Effect <strong>of</strong> soil moisture,<br />

evapotranspiration, stress degree days on pod yield <strong>of</strong> groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L).<br />

J.<strong>of</strong> Agrometeorol. 15 (2): 135-137.<br />

Mean Pod yield <strong>of</strong> groundnut (kg ha -1 ) as influenced by PASM (%) at various<br />

Phenophase /<br />

PASM<br />

phenophases <strong>of</strong> groundnut (PASM values in parenthesis)<br />

Severe<br />

drought<br />

(25 and 50 and<br />

75)<br />

Emergence 399 (16) 849 (42) - 1680 (92) 976<br />

Vegetative 766 (15) 839 (40) 1999 (59) 1110 (99) 1179<br />

Flowering 1147 (10) 1494 (42) 1459 (64) 1448 (100) 1387<br />

Pegging 867 (12) 1296 (34) 1400 (58) 1066 (95) 1157<br />

Pod Development 661 (8) 962 (36) 1435 (64) 1517 (90) 1144<br />

Maturity 970 (6) 1464 (33) - - 1217<br />

Mean 802 1151 1573 1364 1183<br />

Mea<br />

n<br />

T6-05R-1195<br />

An Impact Assessment <strong>of</strong> Agromet Advisory Service (AAS) for<br />

Sustainable Agriculture and Resilient Farm Income: Study <strong>of</strong> Farm<br />

Precise Mobile Application<br />

Nikhil Nikam 1* , Nitin Kumbhar 2 , Ajay Shelke 2<br />

1<br />

Watershed Organisation Trust (WOTR), Pune, Maharashtra<br />

2<br />

Sanjeevani Institute for Empowerment and Development (SIED), Aurangabad, Maharashtra<br />

* nikhil.nikam@wotr.org.in<br />

Agromet Advisory Services (AAS) are crucial for agricultural planning and adaptation<br />

responses. Earlier, farmers could predict the arrival <strong>of</strong> monsoons based on their past<br />

experiences; now, changing climate makes it challenging to make predictions based on<br />

experiences alone (Wang et al. 2022). Therefore, reliable forecasts <strong>of</strong> weather events are<br />

needed on short and long-time scales to minimize agriculture losses. Adopting technological<br />

innovations is one <strong>of</strong> the most promising and investigated ways to adapt to climate change<br />

(Lybbert and Sumner 2012). At the same time, it builds the capacity <strong>of</strong> communities and<br />

individuals to plan and implement adaptive responses in the face <strong>of</strong> changing climate. There<br />

are quite a few methods to disseminate the advisories to the farmers; however, Watershed<br />

Organisation Trust (WOTR) undertook an action research project where a mobile<br />

application was developed to provide farm-level agro-advisory services to farmers. This<br />

study was undertaken with objective to measure the impact <strong>of</strong> the FarmPrecise mobile app<br />

on reducing the climate-induced losses <strong>of</strong> agrarian communities through specific indicators.<br />

Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts<br />

808 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Methodology<br />

A baseline household survey <strong>of</strong> 360 respondents from 36 villages <strong>of</strong> the Ahmednagar, Jalna,<br />

and Dhule districts <strong>of</strong> Maharashtra was conducted in December 2017. Randomly ten<br />

households were selected from each village. The results <strong>of</strong> the baseline study helped to<br />

restructure the strategies <strong>of</strong> the FarmPrecise application. In December 2021, an impact<br />

assessment study was conducted with the same respondents to know the usefulness <strong>of</strong> the<br />

FarmPrecise advisory. In the sample, 92 respondents (treatment group) installed and<br />

adopted the FarmPrecise advisories, and 252 did farming as usual (control group). The<br />

descriptive statistic method has been used for the analysis. Baseline data is compared to the<br />

midterm data to understand the change in technology adaptation and agricultural practices.<br />

Results<br />

The use <strong>of</strong> mobile applications as an information source for agro-met advisories has<br />

increased compared to the baseline scenario. The study finding showed that the use <strong>of</strong><br />

mobile applications for agricultural information sources increased from 35.6 to 44.2 % <strong>of</strong><br />

households. Based on the survey <strong>of</strong> assessing the number <strong>of</strong> farmers relying on different<br />

mobile applications as agricultural information source in the initial times majority <strong>of</strong> them<br />

depended primarily on whatsapp (baseline), But in midterm 27% <strong>of</strong> the HHs were using<br />

FarmPrecise, followed by youtube, whatsapp, facebook and other mobile applications.<br />

Season<br />

Perceived benefits <strong>of</strong> FarmPrecise advisories<br />

Climate-related avoided<br />

loss (per acre)<br />

HHs<br />

No <strong>of</strong><br />

crops<br />

Amount<br />

(Rs)<br />

Avg. input cost saved<br />

(per acre)<br />

HHs<br />

No <strong>of</strong><br />

crops<br />

Amount<br />

(Rs)<br />

Avg. productivity<br />

increased (per acre)<br />

809 | Page Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts<br />

HHs<br />

No <strong>of</strong><br />

crops<br />

Produ<br />

ction<br />

(Qt)<br />

Perennial 5 6 1675.0 5 6 3908.3 4 5 2.9<br />

Kharif 53 81 2909.7 51 78 1995.8 51 76 1.4<br />

Rabi 33 43 2514.4 32 41 1584.8 32 41 1.7<br />

Total/ 56 130 2366.4 55 125 2496.3 55 122 2.0<br />

average<br />

Source: Sampled household survey Dec-2017 and Dec-2021<br />

Perceived benefits by adopting FarmPrecise advisories indicate that 56 households have<br />

avoided climate-related losses on an average <strong>of</strong> Rs 2366 per acre as seen in the table.<br />

Besides, 55 users also saved Rs 2496 per acre on various agricultural input costs. In<br />

addition, 55 users have reported an increase in average crop productivity <strong>of</strong> up to 2 quintals<br />

per acre. The features like real-time weather information, weather-based crop-specific<br />

advisories, updated market rates, and on-time support from the community forum <strong>of</strong> the<br />

FarmPrecise app helped in increasing crop productivity, saving input costs, and avoiding


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

climate-related crop losses. The adoption <strong>of</strong> FarmPrecise advisories positively impacts crop<br />

production compared with the business-as-usual respondents. The productivity <strong>of</strong> cotton,<br />

maize, and paddy was increased by 5.4, 10, and 2.8%, respectively, as compared to the<br />

business-as-usual farmers. At the same time, the productivity <strong>of</strong> rabi crops like wheat, onion,<br />

and maize increased by 13.0, 10.6, and 32.7%, respectively, compared to the control.<br />

Overall, the crop productivity <strong>of</strong> FarmPrecise users (treatment group) increased by 5.7%<br />

more than that <strong>of</strong> the business-as-usual farmer (control group).<br />

Productivity (Qt/ acre)<br />

20.0<br />

18.0<br />

16.0<br />

14.0<br />

12.0<br />

10.0<br />

8.0<br />

6.0<br />

4.0<br />

2.0<br />

0.0<br />

9.4<br />

9.9<br />

6.9<br />

7.1<br />

16.9<br />

18.6<br />

14.1<br />

14.6<br />

6.4<br />

6.6<br />

Business as usual farmer<br />

3.6<br />

2.9<br />

8.5 (MT)<br />

8.1 (MT)<br />

9.9<br />

11.3<br />

6.2<br />

6.1<br />

FarmPrecise user<br />

8.7 (MT)<br />

9.7 (MT)<br />

Cotton<br />

Soybean<br />

Maize<br />

6.0<br />

6.8<br />

13.4<br />

Paddy<br />

18.6<br />

Pearl millet<br />

Green gram<br />

Onion (Tonne)<br />

Wheat<br />

Chickpea<br />

Onion (Tonne)<br />

Sorghum<br />

Maize<br />

Kharif<br />

Rabi<br />

Conclusion<br />

The productivity difference between farm precise users and business as usual farmers<br />

The study findings concluded that the features <strong>of</strong> the FarmPrecise app, like weather<br />

forecasts, weather-based farm-specific crop advisories, community forums, and mandi<br />

prices, are most commonly used by farmers. The FarmPrecise app was successful in<br />

delivering more reliable and timely information to farmers and had the potential to improve<br />

the effectiveness <strong>of</strong> AAS significantly and enhance resilient farm income.<br />

References<br />

Lybbert, Travis J., and Daniel, A., Sumner. 2012. Agricultural Technologies for Climate<br />

Change in Developing Countries: Policy Options for Innovation and Technology<br />

Diffusion. Food Policy 37(1): 114–23.<br />

Wang, Huijun et al. 2022. “Predicting Climate Anomalies: A Real Challenge.” Atmospheric<br />

and Oceanic Science Letters 15(1): 100115.<br />

Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts<br />

810 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

T6-06R-1237<br />

Institutional Interventions for Enhancing Productivity in Rainfed<br />

Agriculture<br />

C.N. Anshida Beevi * , G. Nirmala, Jagriti Rohit, K. Nagasree, K. Ravi Shankar and<br />

V.K. Singh<br />

ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

* anshida.cn@icar.gov.in<br />

Rainfed areas assume a special significance in terms <strong>of</strong> agricultural production and livelihood<br />

for millions <strong>of</strong> households in India. The term rainfed agriculture is defined as regions where<br />

crops are predominantly dependent on rainfall with some support from groundwater. Rainfed<br />

areas in India are highly diverse, ranging from resource-rich areas with huge potential to<br />

resource-constrained areas with a number <strong>of</strong> challenges. Rainfed agriculture is mainly affected<br />

by intermittent dry spells during the cropping season particularly at critical crop growth stages<br />

coinciding with the terminal growth stage. Rainfall is a truly random factor in the rainfed<br />

production system and its variation is highly uncertain. In recent decades, traditional<br />

subsistence farming is also moving towards the cultivation <strong>of</strong> commercial or cash crops. As a<br />

result, these regions are facing severe constraints in terms <strong>of</strong> resource, institutional and policy<br />

constraints. A paradigm shift in rainfed agriculture can be achieved by technological<br />

interventions coupled with innovative extension strategies. Over the past decades, various<br />

organizations including both international and national research organizations like ICRISAT,<br />

CRIDA, CAZRI, etc., and Government <strong>of</strong> India initiatives such as the National Mission for<br />

Sustainable Agriculture, Pradhan Mantri Krishi Sinchai Yojana, etc, are working in this<br />

direction. This article explains about the initiatives in detail to understand the present scenario.<br />

National Mission for Sustainable Agriculture<br />

Indian agriculture remains predominantly rainfed covering about 60% <strong>of</strong> the country’s net<br />

sown area and accounting for 40% <strong>of</strong> the total food production. Thus, the conservation <strong>of</strong><br />

natural resources in conjunction with the development <strong>of</strong> rainfed agriculture holds the key to<br />

meeting increasing demands for food grain in the country. Towards this end, National Mission<br />

for Sustainable Agriculture (NMSA) has been formulated. NMSA will cater to key dimensions<br />

<strong>of</strong> ‘Water use efficiency’, ‘Nutrient Management’, and ‘Livelihood diversification’ through the<br />

adoption <strong>of</strong> sustainable development pathways by progressively shifting to environmentally<br />

friendly technologies, adoption <strong>of</strong> energy-efficient equipment, conservation <strong>of</strong> natural<br />

resources, integrated farming, etc. Besides, NMSA aims at promoting location-specific<br />

improved agronomic practices through soil health management, enhanced water use efficiency,<br />

judicious use <strong>of</strong> chemicals, crop diversification, progressive adoption <strong>of</strong> crop-livestock farming<br />

systems, and integrated approaches like crop-sericulture, agro-forestry, fish farming, etc.<br />

811 | Page Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

NMSA has the following four (4) major programme components or activities:<br />

1. Rainfed Area Development (RAD)<br />

2. On-Farm Water Management (OFWM)<br />

3. Soil Health Management (SHM)<br />

4. Climate Change and Sustainable Agriculture: Monitoring, Modelling, and Networking<br />

(CCSAMMN)<br />

State-wise Beneficiary Count under RAD 2021-22<br />

State Total beneficiary State Total beneficiary<br />

Assam 86 Rajasthan 46<br />

Chhattisgarh 569 Tamil Nadu 8167<br />

Gujarat 2491 Telangana 58<br />

Himachal Pradesh 1535 UP 1170<br />

Karnataka 1609 Uttarakhand 525<br />

Mizoram 60 West Bengal 25<br />

Odisha 4432 Total 20773<br />

(Source: MoAFW, GoI)<br />

Pradhan Mantri Krishi Sinchai Yojana<br />

The government <strong>of</strong> India is committed to accord high priority to water conservation and its<br />

management. To this effect, Pradhan Mantri Krishi Sinchai Yojana (PMKSY) has been<br />

formulated with the vision <strong>of</strong> extending the coverage <strong>of</strong> irrigation “Har Khet ko Pani” and<br />

improving water use efficiency “More Crop Per Drop” The Cabinet Committee on Economic<br />

Affairs chaired by Hon’ble Prime Minister has accorded approval <strong>of</strong> PMKSY in its meeting<br />

held on 1 st July 2015. The major objective <strong>of</strong> PMKSY is to achieve convergence <strong>of</strong> investments<br />

in irrigation at the field level, expand cultivable area under assured irrigation, improve on-farm<br />

water use efficiency to reduce wastage <strong>of</strong> water, enhance the adoption <strong>of</strong> precision-irrigation<br />

and other water-saving technologies, enhance recharge <strong>of</strong> aquifers and introduce sustainable<br />

water conservation practices by exploring the feasibility <strong>of</strong> reusing treated municipal waste<br />

water for peri-urban agriculture and attract greater private investment in the precision irrigation<br />

system.<br />

PMKSY has been conceived by amalgamating earlier schemes viz. Accelerated Irrigation<br />

Benefit Programme (AIBP) <strong>of</strong> the Ministry <strong>of</strong> Water Resources, River Development & Ganga<br />

Rejuvenation (MoWR, RD&GR), Integrated Watershed Management Programme (IWMP) <strong>of</strong><br />

the Department <strong>of</strong> Land Resources (DoLR) and On Farm Water Management (OFWM) <strong>of</strong><br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Agriculture and Cooperation (DAC). The scheme will be implemented by the<br />

Ministries <strong>of</strong> Agriculture, Water Resources, and Rural Development. Ministry <strong>of</strong> Rural<br />

Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts<br />

812 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Development is mainly to undertake rainwater conservation, construction <strong>of</strong> farm ponds, water<br />

harvesting structures, small check dams, contour bunding, etc.<br />

Area covered under PMKSY 2021-22<br />

Micro Irrigation<br />

Drip<br />

3.58 Lakh ha<br />

Sprinkler<br />

6.57 Lakh ha<br />

Total<br />

10.15 Lakh ha<br />

Other Interventions<br />

Potential created for protective irrigation 0.06 Lakh ha<br />

(Source: MoA&FW, GoI)<br />

Conclusion<br />

Rainfed agriculture is a complex, diverse, and risk-prone activity. However, properly managing<br />

the rainfed areas would help to contribute a larger share in food grain production. Though<br />

rainfed areas have huge potential to contribute a larger share in food production and faster<br />

agricultural growth, it is characterized by low levels <strong>of</strong> productivity and input usage coupled<br />

with weather aberrations due to climate change; resulting in wide variations and instability in<br />

crop yields. In view <strong>of</strong> the growing demand for food grains in the country, the developmental<br />

needs <strong>of</strong> the rainfed regions would be <strong>of</strong> utmost importance to ensure the growth <strong>of</strong> the<br />

agriculture sector in the country.<br />

References<br />

https://pmksy.gov.in/<br />

https://nmsa.dac.gov.in/RptBeneficiarycount.aspx<br />

Sharma, B. R., Rao, K. V., Vittal, K. P. R., & Amarasinghe, U. 2008. Converting rain into<br />

grain: Opportunities for realising the potential rainfed agriculture in India.<br />

In Proceedings National Workshop <strong>of</strong> National River Linking Project <strong>of</strong> India,<br />

International Water Management Institute, Colombo (pp. 239-252).<br />

813 | Page Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

T6-07R-1214<br />

Perceived Attributes Leading to the Adoption <strong>of</strong> Agromet Advisories by<br />

Dryland Farmers in India<br />

Jagriti Rohit, G Nirmala, Anshida Beevi, K Nagasree, S. K Bal, K Ravi Shankar,<br />

B.M.K Raju and V. K Singh<br />

ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

The importance <strong>of</strong> Agromet advisories services (AAS) as a tool to address the risk associated<br />

in agriculture has increased to many folds in recent years. AAS is a climate resilient technology<br />

which provides the valuable information about all agricultural operations from land preparation<br />

sowing to harvest based on weather forecasting. The emerging ability to provide timely, skillful<br />

weather forecasts <strong>of</strong>fers the potential to reduce human vulnerability to weather vagaries<br />

(Hansen, 2002). Relevant weather forecast not only helps for efficient management <strong>of</strong> farm<br />

resources and also helps for increasing crop yields and farm income. Hence, improved microlevel<br />

weather based Agromet Advisory Service (AAS) greatly helps farming community to<br />

take advantage <strong>of</strong> favourable weather and mitigate the impacts <strong>of</strong> external weather situations.<br />

Characteristic <strong>of</strong> a technology or attribute <strong>of</strong> an innovation is a precondition for adoption. In<br />

Rogers’ seminal synthesis on the adoption <strong>of</strong> innovations, innovation attributes are identified<br />

as having a pr<strong>of</strong>ound impact on farmers’ adaptive decisions (Rogers 2003). Agricultural studies<br />

have also demonstrated the importance <strong>of</strong> the perceived attributes <strong>of</strong> innovation in relation to<br />

its adoption (Tey et al 2014)<br />

Methodology<br />

For Under National Innovation in climate resilient agriculture (NICRA), Krishi Vigyan<br />

Kendras are providing AAS to farmers. Hence, Kurnool district, Andhra Pradesh was selected<br />

purposively as KVK Banaganapalli was giving AAS to farmers in nearby villages since<br />

inception <strong>of</strong> NICRA. Three villages namely Yagantipalle, Mirapur and Chirolokuttur receiving<br />

AAS were selected purposively for the study. A pilot study was undertaken which led to the<br />

modification <strong>of</strong> sampling plan. The farmers were categorized into two groups viz farmers in<br />

direct contact with KVK and receiving the message and farmers who received the message<br />

from the directly contacted farmers via in whatsapp group. The farmers from both the groups<br />

were selected following the proportionate random sampling.<br />

The total numbers <strong>of</strong> respondents for the study was 180. Data was collected using structured<br />

questionnaire. In Rogers’ theory <strong>of</strong> diffusion <strong>of</strong> innovation, there are five common attributes<br />

<strong>of</strong> innovations: relative advantage, complexity, compatibility, observability, and trialability.<br />

The term “relative advantage” refers to the extent to which new ideas, behaviours, and objects<br />

are viewed as more innovative and superior to the innovations they are replacing. Additional<br />

Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts<br />

814 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

relative advantages include timesaving, reduction <strong>of</strong> discomfort, social prestige, and<br />

immediacy <strong>of</strong> the benefits from the innovation. Compatibility is defined as the degree to which<br />

potential adopters perceived the innovation consistent with their existing values and past<br />

experiences. Complexity is described as the degree to which potential users perceived the<br />

innovation as relatively difficult to comprehend and use. Trialability is characterised by “the<br />

degree to which an innovation may be experimented with on a limited basis”.<br />

Results<br />

The results <strong>of</strong> the study as shown in table 1. The results show that significant difference was<br />

observed with respect to ease <strong>of</strong> use (Chi square=.027) and result demonstrability (chi<br />

square=.001) at one percent level <strong>of</strong> significance. The farmers were able to implement the<br />

message by themselves and also, they could contact the KVK <strong>of</strong>ficials for any clarifications.<br />

Perceived attributes <strong>of</strong> innovation <strong>of</strong> AAS (district Kurnool, A.P)<br />

Perceived Attributes Total Yagantipalle Mirapuram Chirokuttur Kruskall Wallis<br />

Chi square<br />

m sd m sd m sd m sd<br />

Relative advantage 19.8 1.65 19.3 1.64 19.6 1.43 19.8 1.85 .492<br />

Compatibility 17.8 1.77 18.0 1.77 17.9 1.77 17.3 1.62 .193<br />

Complexity/ease <strong>of</strong> use 17.6 2.44 17.8 2.03 17.9 2.05 16.5 2.88 .027*<br />

Trialability 18.5 1.77 18.6 1.93 18.45 1.90 18.4 1.78 .784<br />

Result demonstrability 18.6 1.96 18.8 1.91 18.3 1.83 17.3 1.75 .001*<br />

*Significant at 1percent level <strong>of</strong> significance<br />

1= Yagantipalle 2= Mirapuram 3= Chirokuttur<br />

Conclusion<br />

Result demonstrability and ease <strong>of</strong> use were the perceived characteristic <strong>of</strong> innovation found to<br />

be significant factor leading to adoption <strong>of</strong> AAS. Extension agencies should take care <strong>of</strong> the<br />

perceived attributes while formulating and implementing the messages.<br />

References<br />

Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion <strong>of</strong> innovations. Free Press. New York, 551.<br />

Hansen, J.W. (2002), Realizing the potential benefits <strong>of</strong> climate perdition to agriculture and<br />

challenges. Agricultural systems 74: 329-330.<br />

Tey, Y. S., Li, E., Bruwer, J., Abdullah, A. M., Brindal, M., Radam, A., ... & Darham, S. (2014).<br />

The relative importance <strong>of</strong> factors influencing the adoption <strong>of</strong> sustainable agricultural<br />

practices: A factor approach for Malaysian vegetable farmers. Sustainability science,<br />

9(1), 17-29.<br />

815 | Page Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

T6-08R-1518<br />

Assessment <strong>of</strong> Pr<strong>of</strong>itability and Sustainability <strong>of</strong> Sunflower as a<br />

Component in Emerging Cropping Systems <strong>of</strong> Northern Karnataka<br />

M.R. Umesh*, U.K. Shanwad, Vikas V. Kulkarni, Vijayakumar N Ghante,<br />

N. Poornima, Ananda, and Anand S. Kamble<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Agricultural Sciences, Raichur-584104 Karnataka, India<br />

*mrumehsagri@gmail.com<br />

Intensifying cropping systems can be achieved by increasing the spatial and temporal<br />

arrangement <strong>of</strong> different compatible crops. Within field temporal heterogeneity can be<br />

achieved by growing several crops in sequences differing in the patterns <strong>of</strong> resource use. In<br />

Northern Karnataka pigeonpea and Bt-cotton are predominant crops. These are increasingly<br />

used as alternative crops to sunflower that dominate irrigated regions <strong>of</strong> Northern Karnataka.<br />

Shift from sunflower (22.6 lakhs ha in 1992 to 2.56 lakhs ha in 2020) to alternate cropping<br />

systems may have significant effect on oil production in the region. To intensify the sunflowerbased<br />

cropping system field trial was conducted with an objective to assess sunflower crop as<br />

a component under crop diversification with new/emerging cropping systems in terms <strong>of</strong><br />

system productivity and pr<strong>of</strong>itability. Sunflower was compared in a yearly sequence with<br />

maize, bajra and soybean compared with sunflower-chickpea system.<br />

Methodology<br />

A 3-year field experiment was conducted in fixed plots <strong>of</strong> medium to deep Vertisols at<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Agriculture Sciences, Raichur Karnataka. During rainy season maize hybrid (NK<br />

6240), bajra (cv. MBP-2) and soybean (DSb-21) were grown in addition to sunflower hybrid<br />

(RSFH-1887) whereas in rabi, sunflower and chickpea (cv. JG-11) were grown in undisturbed<br />

plots. For rabi crops, chemical fertilizers were applied as per soil test crop response (STCR)<br />

target yield @3 t/ha, 50% STCR and compared with regional fertilizer recommendation (RDF)<br />

(90:90:60 kg NPK/ha). Soil smaples were analysed for NPK status after harvest <strong>of</strong> Kharif crops.<br />

Based on sol test values STCR equation adopted for rabi sunflower is FN= 8.38T-0.57 SN;<br />

FP2O5= 8.05T-6.00 SP2O5; FK2O= 9.87 T-0.47 SK2O and STCR target yield equation for<br />

chickpea FN = 5.35T-0.22 SN- 0.098ON; FP2O5 =3.71T-1.16 SP- 0.15OP; FK2O = 8.32T-0.43<br />

SK- 0.22OK wherein target yield (T) <strong>of</strong> 30 q/ha is common for both the crops. In all the years,<br />

Kharif crops were sown in July and rabi crops were sown in October/November after harvest<br />

<strong>of</strong> kharif crops.<br />

Results<br />

The results <strong>of</strong> the study has showed that maize-sunflower system was out yielded in terms <strong>of</strong><br />

system sunflower crop equivalent yield (4355 kg/ha), system returns (Rs. 194713/ha) and<br />

Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts<br />

816 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

overall benefit cost ratio (2.93) as compared to rest <strong>of</strong> the cropping sequences and existing<br />

sunflower-chickpea system (Table 1). It also recorded greater sustainable yield index (0.93)<br />

and partial factor productivity. Application <strong>of</strong> fertilizers based on STCR to boost up the system<br />

productivity (3268 kg/ha) and sustainable yield index (51.2) over RDF <strong>of</strong> the region. It can be<br />

concluded that yearly sequence <strong>of</strong> maize-sunflower was found remunerative and potential<br />

alternative double cropping system over existing sunflower-chickpea system in Vertisols <strong>of</strong><br />

Northern Karnataka.<br />

Conclusion<br />

Over 3-years, among Kharif crops, maize has produced higher grain yield in terms <strong>of</strong> sunflower<br />

equivalent yield (SEY). For rabi sunflower and chickpea application <strong>of</strong> fertilizers based on<br />

100% STCR@3t/ha target recorded higher SEY. Maize-sunflower sequence gave higher<br />

system SEY (4355 kg ha -1 ) and economic returns (Rs.128400 ha -1 ) over existing sunflowerchickpea<br />

and other systems. It was concluded that maize- sunflower system was greater<br />

productive with application <strong>of</strong> fertilizers based on STCR 100% for rabi crops.<br />

Yield and economics <strong>of</strong> kharif and rabi crops in sunflower-based cropping systems<br />

(Data is average <strong>of</strong> 3 years)<br />

Cropping<br />

system 'C'<br />

Kharif<br />

(kg/ha)<br />

Cropping system (C)<br />

Kharif<br />

SEY<br />

(kg/ha)<br />

Rabi<br />

(kg/ha)<br />

Rabi<br />

SEY<br />

(kg/ha)<br />

System<br />

SEY<br />

(kg/ha)<br />

GR<br />

(Rs./ha)<br />

NR<br />

(Rs./ha)<br />

COC<br />

(Rs./ha)<br />

B:C<br />

ratio<br />

Bajra- SF 1243 490 1650 1650 2140 20075 8075 12000 1.67 0.47<br />

Maize-SF 8771 2589 1701 1701 4290 106129 68629 37500 2.83 0.93<br />

Soybean-<br />

SF<br />

SF-<br />

Chickpea<br />

879 911 1830 1830 2741 37358 11358 26000 1.44 0.53<br />

1612 1612 1360 1659 3271 66092 39272 26820 2.46 0.69<br />

S.Em.+ 72.6 20.4 23 77.9 - - - -<br />

CD @ 5% 256.3 71.82 81.1 274.8 - - - -<br />

Fertilizer levels (F)<br />

RDF - 1386 1661 1603 3120 67650 40740 26820 2.52 0.49<br />

STCR<br />

@3t/ha<br />

- 1309 1867 1959 3268 69741 42921 26820 2.63 0.51<br />

50% STCR - 1506 1377 1437 2943 75030 48210 26820 2.86 0.48<br />

S.Em+ 49.7 25.1 26.1 56.8<br />

CD @5% 150.3 76 79 171.8 - - - -<br />

F x C NS NS NS NS - - - -<br />

SEY- Sunflower equivalent yield; SYI- Sustainable yield index; GR- Gross returns; NR- Net Returns; COC-<br />

Cost <strong>of</strong> cultivation; SF- Sunflower<br />

SYI<br />

817 | Page Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts<br />

T6-09R-1359<br />

Integrated Farming System: A Scientific Approach Towards Doubling<br />

Farmers Income<br />

Keshav Mehra, Durga Singh, S.P. Singh and Mukesh Choudhary<br />

Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Bikaner-I Swami Keshwanand Rajasthan Agricultural University, Bikaner<br />

Agriculture is the most significant source <strong>of</strong> income and the backbone <strong>of</strong> Indian economy. India<br />

is a global agricultural powerhouse. It is the world’s largest producer <strong>of</strong> milk, pulses and spices<br />

and has the world’s largest cattle herd (buffaloes), as well as the largest area under wheat, rice<br />

and cotton. The majority <strong>of</strong> farming communities follow traditional farming systems which<br />

provides less pr<strong>of</strong>it as compared to Integrated Farming System (IFS). Integrated farming<br />

system is a holistic approach that involves crop cultivation, dairy, poultry, fishery, mushroom<br />

cultivation, agro-forestry, piggery, beekeeping, vegetable and fruit production, use <strong>of</strong><br />

renewable energy source (Solar energy, Biogas) etc. An IFS model is developed at Krishi<br />

Vigyan Kendra, Bikaner to promote the IFS in the arid and semi-arid regions <strong>of</strong> Rajasthan.<br />

Two ha area is devoted under the different units like agriculture (pearlmillet and wheat),<br />

horticulture (Vegetable and Fruits), animal (Cow and goat), azolla and vermicompost unit etc.<br />

Pomegranate, lemon, custard apple, jamun and khirani orchards were established in 0.5 ha.<br />

area. In the initial year it is less pr<strong>of</strong>itable due to the time taken by the fruit plants to bear the<br />

fruits. Kadaknath breed <strong>of</strong> poultry have a good market demand after the pandemic <strong>of</strong> COVID-<br />

19, which also provided good income to the KVK. Sirohi is a dual-purpose goat breed which<br />

is popular for their weight gain and lactation even under poor quality rearing conditions. The<br />

animals are resistant to major diseases and are easily adaptable to different climatic conditions<br />

specially in hot places. Cow dung and goat manure were utilized to prepare the vermicompost.<br />

Azolla is used as feed <strong>of</strong> cow and goat to increase the milk production. In IFS model all<br />

resources are managed efficiently in such a manner that waste output <strong>of</strong> one enterprise serves<br />

as a input for another.<br />

T6-10R-1177<br />

Impact <strong>of</strong> Cluster Field Demonstrations in Groundnut Productivity<br />

Enhancement under Rainfed Alfisols <strong>of</strong> YSR District, Andhra Pradesh<br />

D.V. Srinivasulu, K. Ravi Kumar, S. Ramalakshmi Devi and A. Veeraiah<br />

KrishiVigyan Kendra, Utukur, Kadapa, YSR District,<br />

Acharya N.G.Ranga Agricultural University, A.P.-516003<br />

Among the oil seeds groundnut (Arachis hypogea L.,) is a major oilseed crop <strong>of</strong> India with<br />

nearly 80% <strong>of</strong> the annual acreage (41.6 lakh ha) and production (83.8 lakh tonnes) coming<br />

from kharif crop (June-October) under rainfed conditions (Anonymous, 2020). In Andhra<br />

818 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Pradesh, the crop is cultivated in 6.8 lakhs hectares during kharif with an average production<br />

and productivity <strong>of</strong> 3.3 lakh tonnes and 484 kg ha -1 , respectively. Y.S.R Kadapa district is one<br />

<strong>of</strong> the potential districts for groundnut in Andhra Pradesh where the groundnut area is decreased<br />

from 44,179 ha during 2012-13to 25,315 ha during 2017-18. There was also wide fluctuation<br />

in the groundnut productivity <strong>of</strong> the district i.e between 252 to 1560 kg ha -1 during the last seven<br />

years.<br />

In order to address the production constraints and achieve the sustainable yields in groundnut,<br />

along with the objective <strong>of</strong> adopting Best Management Practices (BMP), Cluster Frontline<br />

Demonstrations (CFLDs) in groundnut were demonstrated among the farmers’ fields by the<br />

scientists <strong>of</strong> KrishiVigyan Kendra, Utukur under the scheme <strong>of</strong> National Food Security Mission<br />

(NFSM), Ministry <strong>of</strong> Agriculture, GoI through ICAR-ATARI-Zone-Vin selective mandals <strong>of</strong><br />

YSR Kadapa district.<br />

Methodology<br />

CFLDs in groundnut were organized by KVK, Utukur during kharif season in rainfed alfisols<br />

<strong>of</strong> Lakkireddipalli and Chinnamandem mandals <strong>of</strong> Y.S.R. Kadapa district (at present<br />

Annamayya district) <strong>of</strong> Andhra Pradesh during 2017-18 and 2018-19, respectively. An area <strong>of</strong><br />

20 ha in42farm holding/demonstration sites were covered. The actual rainfall received by<br />

Lakkireddipalli and Chinnamandem mandals during South West monsoon period is 301.0 mm<br />

and 318.5 mm as against normal rainfall <strong>of</strong> 404.0 mm during the study years. Under this<br />

programme, each demonstration site implemented the BMP’s recommended by ANGRAU like<br />

1) Improved seed: groundnut var .dharani, 2) Application <strong>of</strong> bi<strong>of</strong>ertilizers viz. Rhizobium, PSB<br />

and KSB@ 5 kg ha -1 3)Soil test based fertilizer recommendation,4) Application <strong>of</strong> Gypsum @<br />

500 kg ha -1 at flowering stage 5) Integrated Pest Management (IPM): Seed treatment with<br />

Imidachloprid 600 FS @ 2 ml + 4 L water per kg seed, border cropping with Bajra/Jowar,<br />

spraying <strong>of</strong> neem oil (1500 ppm) at 20-30 DAS, erection <strong>of</strong> pheromone traps @ 20 no’s ha -1 ,<br />

erection <strong>of</strong> bird perches @ 20 no’s ha -1 and judicious use <strong>of</strong> pesticides 6) Implementation <strong>of</strong><br />

Resource Conservation Technologies (RCT’s)/tools: Sub soiling with sub soiler at an interval<br />

<strong>of</strong> 1.0 m and compartmental bunding with size <strong>of</strong> 40 m 2 (8 m x 5m) for insitu rain water<br />

conservation and using seed to seed mechanization7) Using drip/sprinkler system/rain guns for<br />

life saving irrigation during dry spells at critical stages8) Spraying <strong>of</strong> 2 per cent Urea to mitigate<br />

dry spell were demonstrated in farmer’s fields (demo plots) against farmer’s<br />

practice(check)which include:(Seed from the local vendors/home grown with low yield<br />

potential and susceptibility to diseases (eg. K-6/mixtures), application <strong>of</strong> complex fertilizers,<br />

no adoption <strong>of</strong> resource conserving techniques/insitu rain water conservation practices, no<br />

drought management and IPM practices). Under demonstration plot, improved groundnut var.<br />

dharani and bio-fertilizers were given to the farmers by the KVK.<br />

819 | Page Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

The crop was sown during 2 nd F.N <strong>of</strong> June to 1 st F.N <strong>of</strong> July and harvested at maturity during<br />

1 st fortnight <strong>of</strong> October in both the years. The method demonstrations were conducted on BMP<br />

sat fields <strong>of</strong> beneficiary farmers. The yield data recorded from 5m × 5m plot in demonstration<br />

and farmers’ practice and field days at harvest were conducted. The data on yield and<br />

economics were tabulated and analyzed year wise. Further, from the yield data in the study<br />

area extension gap, technology gap and technology index were worked out using the following<br />

formulae (Samui et al., 2000).<br />

Results<br />

In demonstration plots the average pod yield <strong>of</strong> dharani variety was 818 kg ha -1 (ranged from<br />

700 to 1060 kg ha -1 ) and 1355 kg ha -1 (ranged from 1254 to 1545 kg ha -1 ) during 2017-18 and<br />

2018-19, respectively (Table). The technological interventions have resulted in an increase in<br />

yield by 22.1 and 8.7 per cent, respectively during 2017-18 and 2018-19 over farmers practice.<br />

These results are in similarity with the results reported by Yogesh et al. (2018) in groundnut<br />

and Mohan et al. (2019) in Cluster FLDs in sunflower. From the two years data, the mean cost<br />

incurred for implementation <strong>of</strong> BMP’s in demonstration plot was higher by Rs.1375/- ha -<br />

1<br />

compared to farmers practice which resulted in 24.0 percent higher net returns per hectare<br />

with mean B:C ratio <strong>of</strong> 1.99 in demonstration plot.<br />

Yield, extension gap, technology gap and technology index <strong>of</strong> demonstration and farmer<br />

practice ingroundnut cluster FLDs in YSR district, A.P.<br />

2017-18 2018-19<br />

Demo<br />

practice<br />

Farmer<br />

Practice<br />

Demo<br />

practice<br />

Area (ha) 10 10<br />

No. <strong>of</strong> Demonstrations 17 25<br />

Farmer<br />

Practice<br />

Mean Yield (kg ha -1) 818 670 1355 1247<br />

t stat 4.14* 3.97*<br />

Std. Deviation 113 95 99 93<br />

Per cent increase over farmer’s practice 22.1 8.7<br />

Potential yield (kg ha -1 ) 1600 1600<br />

Extension gap (kg ha -1 ) 148 108<br />

Technology gap (kg ha -1 ) 782 245<br />

Technology index (%) 48.9 15.3<br />

*Significant at P = 0.05<br />

Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts<br />

820 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

₹<br />

90000<br />

80000<br />

70000<br />

60000<br />

50000<br />

40000<br />

30000<br />

20000<br />

10000<br />

0<br />

2.31<br />

2.04<br />

1.84<br />

1.74<br />

Demo FP Demo FP<br />

2.50<br />

2.00<br />

1.50<br />

1.00<br />

0.50<br />

0.00<br />

Cost <strong>of</strong><br />

cultivation<br />

Gross returns<br />

Net returns<br />

B : C Ratio<br />

2017-18 2018-19<br />

Year<br />

Economics <strong>of</strong> demonstration Vs farmers’ practice in groundnut Cluster FLDs in YSR District<br />

The technology gap ranged between 782 kg ha -1 to 245 kg ha -1 which further indicates that<br />

there is greater scope <strong>of</strong> productivity enhancement in subsequent years through transfer <strong>of</strong><br />

BMPs from research stations to farmers fields. The technology index which indicates the extent<br />

<strong>of</strong> feasibility <strong>of</strong> improved technology <strong>of</strong> the demonstrations ranged from lowest (15.3 per cent)<br />

during 2018-19 to highest (48.9 per cent) during 2017-18 with average technology index <strong>of</strong><br />

32.1 per cent. The variations might be attributed to variations in level <strong>of</strong> soil nutrients, soil<br />

moisture availability, incidence <strong>of</strong> pests and diseases, integrated nutrient, pest and disease<br />

management strategies in the study area.<br />

Conclusion<br />

The CFLDs conducted by KVK enhanced the yield <strong>of</strong> groundnut vertically and ensured rapid<br />

spread <strong>of</strong> recommended technologies <strong>of</strong> groundnut production horizontally by implementation<br />

<strong>of</strong> various extension activities like training programmes, field days, exposure visits organized<br />

in farmer’s field. The CFLDs made a positive impact on yield <strong>of</strong> groundnut by 15.4 per cent.<br />

It was observed that the potential yield <strong>of</strong> groundnut var. dharani can be achieved by imparting<br />

scientific knowledge to the farmers on BMPs, providing the quality need-based inputs and their<br />

proper utilization. The recipient farmers <strong>of</strong> CFLD also play an important role as source <strong>of</strong><br />

information on BPs and quality seeds for wider dissemination <strong>of</strong> the improved varieties <strong>of</strong><br />

groundnut for other nearby farmers.<br />

References<br />

Anonymous 2020. Area, Production and Yield <strong>of</strong> oilseed crops from 2009-10 to 2019-20.<br />

Directorate <strong>of</strong> Economics & Statistics, Ministry <strong>of</strong> Agriculture & Farmers Welfare,<br />

Government <strong>of</strong> India, New Delhi.<br />

MadakaMadhan Mohan., Ramalakshmi Devi, S. Veeraiah, A. 2019. Demonstration <strong>of</strong> BMP’s<br />

in sunflower for sustainable yields under black soil tracts <strong>of</strong> Rayalaseema region <strong>of</strong><br />

Andhra Pradesh, India. Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. Appl. Sci., 8(09): 2894-2901.<br />

821 | Page Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Samui, S. K., Moitra, S., Ray, D., Mandal, A.K., Saha, D. 2000. Evaluation <strong>of</strong> frontline<br />

demonstration on groundnut. J. Indian Soc. Costal Agric. Res., 18: 180-183.<br />

Yogesh D. Pawar, Sachin H. Malve, F. K. Chaudhary, UmeshDobariya, G. J. Patel, 2018.Yield<br />

gap analysis <strong>of</strong> groundnut through cluster front line demonstration under north Gujarat<br />

condition. Multilogic Sci.,7(25): 177-179.<br />

T6-11P-1004<br />

Drought Mitigation <strong>of</strong> Sorghum by Spraying <strong>of</strong> Foliar Nutrients on yield<br />

and Economics under Dry Spell Situation for Southern Agroclimatic Zone<br />

<strong>of</strong> Tamil Nadu<br />

K. Baskar 1 *, V. Sanjivkumar 2 , S. Manoharan 3 , M. Manikandan 4 , G. Guru 5 , and<br />

G. Ravindrachary 6<br />

1,2,3,4,5 ICAR-AICRP on Dryland Agriculture, Agricultural Research Station, Kovilpatti - 628501,<br />

Tamil Nadu state. 6 Project Coordinator, ICAR-All India Co-ordinated Research Project on Dryland<br />

Agriculture, CRIDA, Hyderabad, Telangana state.<br />

*kbaskartnau@gmail.com<br />

In India around 65-70 % <strong>of</strong> cultivated lands comes under dryland and they contributing about<br />

45 % <strong>of</strong> nations food grain production. Most <strong>of</strong> the crops under millets (>95%), oilseeds (90%)<br />

and pulses 90-95% are cultivated on these lands with low productivity which could be<br />

attributed to inadequate rainfall, poor soil fertility, occurrence <strong>of</strong> dry spells, drought during<br />

cropping season, high temperature, more PET than rainfall etc. Of these drought at critical<br />

period <strong>of</strong> cropping season drastically reduces the crop yield. Sorghum (Sorghum bicolour L.)<br />

is a drought resistance fodder crop.. It is considered promising crop to overcome the fodder<br />

shortages because <strong>of</strong> it’s short duration, drought tolerance, well adaptiveness to arid and semiarid<br />

regions. Moisture and nutrition affect succulence, dry matter, crude protein and other<br />

quality parameters <strong>of</strong> fodder. Foliar application <strong>of</strong> nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium could<br />

increase crop productivity many folds under moisture stress condition. Efficacy <strong>of</strong> foliar<br />

fertilization <strong>of</strong> nitrogen is seven times more than soil application under drought conditions due<br />

to less denitrification and leaching losses. The uptake <strong>of</strong> necessary elements becomes difficult<br />

for plants when fertilizers are applied to soil due to the formation <strong>of</strong> certain soil complexes. To<br />

overcome these issues macro and micro nutrients are applied at critical stages <strong>of</strong> the crops<br />

under dryland situation.<br />

Methodology<br />

A field experiment was conducted at black soil farm <strong>of</strong> AICRPDA Kovilpatti main centre,<br />

Agricultural Research Station, Kovilpatti, Tamil Nadu under dryland situation from 2017-‘20<br />

in rabi season to study the effect <strong>of</strong> foliar application <strong>of</strong> nutrients sprayed during moisture<br />

Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts<br />

822 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

stress condition in rainfed sorghum. The soil at the experimental was clayey in texture and<br />

belongs to Kovilpatti Soil Series (Typic Chromusterts). The soil has sub angular blocky<br />

structure with pH generally neutral to a tendency towards alkalinity at lower depths (7.8 to 8.2)<br />

and saline in nature. The soil bulk density varied from 1.20 to 1.35 kg m -3 with the field capacity<br />

<strong>of</strong> 35 per cent and permanent wilting point <strong>of</strong> 14 per cent (Sunflower as an indicator plant).<br />

This experiment was conducted in split plot design replicated thrice under rainfed situation.<br />

The available nutrient status <strong>of</strong> the soil was low in available nitrogen (134.4kg ha -1 ), low to<br />

medium in available phosphorus (12.1 kg ha -1 ), high in available potassium status (395 kg ha -<br />

1<br />

) and low in available zinc (1.2 ppm). The treatment comprised <strong>of</strong> main plots viz., M1-Foliar<br />

spray during dry spell, M 2 - Foliar spray after relieving <strong>of</strong> stress/dry spell (with favorable soil<br />

moisture) and seven subplots <strong>of</strong> foliar nutrients viz., S 1-Urea @ 1%, S 2-Urea @ 2%, S 3-Water<br />

soluble complex fertilizer (19:19:19) @ 0.5%, S4-Water soluble complex fertilizer (19:19:19)<br />

@ 0.5% + recommended dose <strong>of</strong> micronutrient for foliar spray (zinc), S 5-ZnSO 4 @ 0.5%, S 6-<br />

Water spray, S7-Control (no spray <strong>of</strong> any material/water). Foliar application <strong>of</strong> plant nutrients<br />

are applied as per the treatment schedule under rainfed vertisols.<br />

Effect <strong>of</strong> foliar plant fertilization <strong>of</strong> different chemicals on yield and economics <strong>of</strong><br />

rainfed sorghum (K 12)<br />

Treatments Yield (kg/ha) Cost <strong>of</strong><br />

B:C<br />

Mainplot:<br />

Grain yield<br />

Stover<br />

yield<br />

cultivation<br />

(Rs./ha)<br />

Net returns<br />

(Rs./ha)<br />

M 1 1339 1975 19300 9455 1.49<br />

M 2 1235 1748 19150 7298 1.38<br />

SEd 30.0 45.5<br />

CD (0.05) 62.0 93.5<br />

Sub plot:<br />

Results<br />

T 1 1172 1642 20200 4882 1.24<br />

T 2 1235 1811 20900 5611 1.27<br />

T 3 1378 2288 21100 8748 1.42<br />

T 4 1343 1948 21825 6983 1.32<br />

T 5 1294 1722 20225 7377 1.36<br />

T 6 1202 1574 19700 5914 1.30<br />

T 7 1052 1329 19500 2869 1.15<br />

SEd 31.5 81.2<br />

CD (0.05) 65.0 165.1<br />

In Vertisols under rainfed situation different foliar plant nutrients were applied during stress<br />

and after relieving stress condition. Among the foliar sprays, application <strong>of</strong> water soluble<br />

823 | Page Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

complex fertilizer (19:19:19) @ 0.5% applied during the dryspell condition registered the<br />

highest sorghum grain yield (1378 kg ha -1 ), stover yield (2288 kg ha -1 ), net returns (8748 kg<br />

ha -1 ) and BC ratio (1.42) in rainfed sorghum (K 12) and it was followed by the treatment<br />

sprayed with water soluble complex fertilizer (19:19:19) @ 0.5% + recommended dose <strong>of</strong><br />

micronutrient for foliar spray (ZnSO 4 @ 0.5%) respectively (Table 1.).<br />

The combined fertilizer application through foliar plant nutrition increased yield attributes and<br />

yield <strong>of</strong> millets. This might be due to the supplementation <strong>of</strong> plants with three major and<br />

micronutrients together and these elements enhancing most <strong>of</strong> the metabolic processes. The<br />

supplementation <strong>of</strong> nitrogen increased the protein formation, phosphorous in the formation <strong>of</strong><br />

nucleic acids and energy compounds while potassium influenced the water adjustment and<br />

carbohydrate transportation. The findings corroborated with the findings <strong>of</strong> Emam and<br />

Zavorakh, (2004) and Hussein et al. (2011).<br />

Effect <strong>of</strong> foliar plant fertilization <strong>of</strong> different chemicals on rain water use efficiency (RWUE) <strong>of</strong> rainfed<br />

sorghum (K 12).<br />

During dryspell condition, the plots treated with foliar application <strong>of</strong> water-soluble complex<br />

fertilizer (19:19:19) @ 0.5% applied during the dryspell condition recorded higher rainwater<br />

use efficiency (2.84 kg/ha-mm) and it was followed by the treatment applied with water soluble<br />

complex fertilizer (19:19:19) @ 0.5% + recommended dose <strong>of</strong> micronutrient for foliar spray<br />

(ZnSO4 @ 0.5%), when compared to all other foliar treatments as in the figure.<br />

Conclusion<br />

It can be concluded that the foliar application <strong>of</strong> water-soluble complex fertilizer (19:19:19) @<br />

0.5 % registered higher grain and stover yields, net returns, BC ratio and rain water use<br />

efficiency during the dryspell condition in rainfed sorghum (K 12) under deep black soils<br />

condition <strong>of</strong> Southern zone <strong>of</strong> Tamil Nadu.<br />

Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts<br />

824 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

References<br />

Emam, A. and M. Zavareh. 2004. Drought tolerance in plants (Analysis <strong>of</strong> the physiological<br />

and molecular biology) (Translation). University publishing centre. Page. 75.<br />

Hussain, F., A.U. Malik, M.A. Haji and A.L. Malghani. 2011. Growth and yield response <strong>of</strong><br />

two cultivars <strong>of</strong> mungbean (Vigna radiata L.) to different potassium levels. The J. Ani.,<br />

Plant Sci., 21(3): 622-625.<br />

T6-12P-1018<br />

A Summative Evaluation <strong>of</strong> Technological Interventions in Poultry<br />

Farming<br />

Prabhat Kumar Pankaj, G. Nirmala, K. Ravi Shankar, V.K. Singh and A. Dinesh<br />

ICAR-Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, Hyderabad-500059, Telangana, India<br />

Poultry farming is an important source <strong>of</strong> livelihood for landless and marginal farmers in the<br />

rural area <strong>of</strong> the country. The backyard poultry farming with improved poultry varieties is a<br />

potential tool to alleviate poverty, eradicate malnutrition, generate subsidiary income, empower<br />

women, and provide gainful employment in rural areas <strong>of</strong> the country (Rajkumar et al., 2021).<br />

Women manage most <strong>of</strong> the activities under backyard system like feeding, watering, cleaning,<br />

and selling <strong>of</strong> chickens, and eggs which lead to their empowerment (Pankaj et al., 2019). The<br />

present investigation was carried out to study the impact <strong>of</strong> improved Srinidhi variety <strong>of</strong> chicks,<br />

advisory services, input support and technological interventions on productivity <strong>of</strong> poultry<br />

birds and income <strong>of</strong> farmers in adopted villages <strong>of</strong> Pudurmandal, Vikarabaddistrict <strong>of</strong><br />

Telangana.<br />

Methodology<br />

The present study was conducted in five villages, viz., Gangupally, Medikonda, Pudugurthy,<br />

Rakamcherla and Devenoniguda in Pudur Mandal, Vikarabad under ‘Farmers FIRST’ project<br />

from September, 2018 to October, 2021. Technological interventions were provided in first<br />

three villages and latter two villages acted as control group (Devenoniguda and Rakamcherla).<br />

Farmers were provided constant advisory services, input support and technological (improved<br />

variety as Srinidhi, health, nutrition and management) interventions in treatment group and no<br />

inputs were provided in the control group. Summative evaluation was conducted after one to<br />

three years <strong>of</strong> interventions. Baseline information on six attributes <strong>of</strong> socio-economic pr<strong>of</strong>ile<br />

like age, education, land holding, flock strength, experience in poultry farming and formal<br />

training in poultry farming were collected through semi-structured interview schedule in the<br />

first year before the start <strong>of</strong> intervention. The data were analyzed by Chi-square, paired and<br />

independent t-tests. The logical framework model approach with elements like supply side<br />

(inputs, activities, outputs) and results side (outcomes and final outcomes) were used to finalize<br />

825 | Page Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

the evaluation <strong>of</strong> intervention on different indicators.<br />

Results<br />

The baseline data showed that all the socio-economic attributes were similar in both the groups<br />

<strong>of</strong> poultry farmers. Majority <strong>of</strong> the farmers were illiterate and landless in both the groups.<br />

During the study period, poultry population in the treatment group increased by 44.64% as<br />

compared to 3.73% in control group (Table 1). The net increase in population was 40.95% from<br />

the control with a significant increase (38.49%) in flock size/household in treatment villages.<br />

There was significant improvement in all productive and reproductive traits in treatment group<br />

compared to the control (Table 1). Net impact on number <strong>of</strong> eggs in 52 weeks, egg weight at<br />

52 nd week, body weight at 52 nd week, age at first laying, mortality at 0-5 week were improved<br />

by 7.02, 14.70, 19.44, 9.61, 6.20%, respectively.<br />

Impact <strong>of</strong> interventions on flock size and different production traits <strong>of</strong> poultry<br />

Characters Control (n=50) Treated (n=50) (F- Impact<br />

Base line<br />

(A)<br />

End line<br />

(B)<br />

(C=B-<br />

A)<br />

Base line<br />

(D)<br />

End line<br />

(E)<br />

(F=<br />

E-D)<br />

C) (%)<br />

Total poultry (no.) 562 583 21 569 823 254 233 40.95<br />

Mean flock size/ HH<br />

(no.)<br />

No. <strong>of</strong> eggs in 52<br />

weeks<br />

Egg weight at 52 nd<br />

week<br />

Body Weight (g) at<br />

52 nd week<br />

Age at first laying<br />

(days)<br />

11.24±1.41 11.66±1.0 0.42 11.38±1.2 16.46±1.4 4.8 ** 4.38 38.49<br />

34.5±2.14 37.6±2.35 3.1 * 35.6±2.23 41.2±2.26 5.6 ** 2.5 7.02<br />

37.6±2.11 40.1±3.14 2.5 38.1±3.17 46.2±3.19 8.1 ** 5.6 14.70<br />

1456±52 1974±61 518 * 1512±51 2324±63 812 ** 294 19.44<br />

215.2±3.2 213.2±2.6 -2.0 218.6±4.1 195.6±2.1 -23 ** -21 9.61<br />

Mortality at 0-5 week 20.3 19.6 -0.7 19.5 12.6 -6.9 -6.2 6.20<br />

*<br />

Significant (p


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

In the present study, net income per household was increased by 52.94%, whereas per bird<br />

income was increased by about 22.35% (Table 2) mainly because <strong>of</strong> increase in body weight<br />

(19.44%) and improved egg production (7.02%). Poultry farmers in the treatment group<br />

increased their expenditure by 111.11% mainly on concentrate feeding and healthcare that led<br />

to higher weight gain ultimately resulting in increased returns.<br />

Conclusion<br />

The study showed that poultry production and income <strong>of</strong> poultry farmers could be increased<br />

by incorporation <strong>of</strong> superior varieties, technologies and input supports pertaining to healthcare<br />

and nutrition along with advisory and education.<br />

References<br />

Pankaj, P.K., Nirmala, G., Shankar, K.R., Reddy, B.S. and Chary, G.R. 2019. Improved poultry<br />

variety for income and nutritional security in semi-arid areas <strong>of</strong> Telangana. Ind.<br />

Farming, 69(6): 18-21.<br />

Rajkumar, U., Rama Rao, S.V. andRaju, M.V.L.N. 2021. Backyard poultry farming for<br />

sustained production and enhanced nutritional and livelihood security with special<br />

reference to India: a review. Trop. Anim. Health. Prod., 53: 176.<br />

T6-13P-1025<br />

Strengthening Small holder Agriculture in Rainfed Areas: Livelihood<br />

Analysis <strong>of</strong> Pigeonpea Growing Farmers <strong>of</strong> Telangana state<br />

G. Nirmala*, A. Amarender Reddy, P. K. Pankaj, K. Ravi Shankar and V. K. Singh<br />

ICAR-Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, Hyderabad-500059, Telangana, India<br />

*g.nirmala@icar.gov.in<br />

With over 1.5 billion people worldwide living in small producer households, the development<br />

<strong>of</strong> these households is critical for income growth, poverty reduction, food security, gender<br />

empowerment, and environmental sustainability (Pingali, 2012). Smallholder agriculture is an<br />

integral part <strong>of</strong> rural livelihoods. As a result, increasing their viability could help to reduce rural<br />

poverty, improve food security and nutrition on multiple levels, and contribute to the<br />

achievement <strong>of</strong> several Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). According to FAO, WFP, and<br />

IFAD (2012), smallholder agriculture development may have a significant impact on the poor's<br />

quality <strong>of</strong> life by increasing income and food availability. Fan and Rue 2020, discussed that<br />

small farmers can succeed by either adopting a ‘move up’ or ‘move out’ strategy. While, some<br />

small farmers may be able to develop their farm operations and engage in pr<strong>of</strong>itable<br />

commercial agriculture activities, others should be assisted in existing agriculture and also<br />

support seeking non-farm employment opportunities. The study was undertaken with the<br />

827 | Page Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

objectives <strong>of</strong> identifying various options for household diversification available with rainfed<br />

farmers with an estimation <strong>of</strong> the diversification index and determining factors that influence<br />

livelihood diversification strategies.<br />

Methodology<br />

The pigeonpea growing farmers from the high pigeonpea cultivating area <strong>of</strong> Telangana State were<br />

selected for the study. The area under pigeonpea was reported to be relatively more in three mandals<br />

namely Tandur, Peddamul and Dharur in 2021. Two villages each from the three mandals selected.<br />

Data were collected from 75 farmers constituting a sample <strong>of</strong> study comprising small, medium and<br />

large farmers largely cultivating pigeonpea and other crops on aspects <strong>of</strong> sources <strong>of</strong> family income<br />

received from crops, livestock, horticulture, remittances received from government schemes and<br />

other household activities. Various farm and non-farm sources <strong>of</strong> income were identified and<br />

significant factors that determine the impact <strong>of</strong> rural livelihood <strong>of</strong> rainfed farmers in predominant<br />

pigeon pea growing areas.<br />

Results<br />

The majority <strong>of</strong> farmers were small and marginal (70%), medium (25%) and large (5%) who are<br />

cultivating short-duration pigeonpea crop varieties <strong>of</strong> 150 -180 days duration. pigeonpeais<br />

cultivated both in kharif and rabi seasons. In rabi season, pigeonpea crop usually is transplanted<br />

and irrigated. A majority <strong>of</strong> small and marginal farmers were found to have high diversity index<br />

ranging between 0.7040-0.7346 and medium (24.66 %) and large farmers (5.48 %) have a diversity<br />

index <strong>of</strong> less than 0.6560 which indicated that small farmers are more diversified compared to large<br />

farmers (Table1). Small farmer households depend upon other non-farm activities and government<br />

schemes for their livelihood other than farming in contrast to medium farmers and large farmers<br />

livelihood patterns.<br />

Diversity index for different landholders concerning household income in pigeon pea growing areas<br />

Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts<br />

828 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Conclusion<br />

The majority <strong>of</strong> farmers <strong>of</strong> predominant rainfed pigeonpea cultivation areas are small and<br />

marginal farmers followed by medium and large farmer categories. The large farmers mostly<br />

adopt intensified farming bringing more area into the cultivation <strong>of</strong> pigeonpea and less engaged<br />

in other non-farm activities, which is in contrast to small and marginal farmers' livelihood<br />

patterns, relatively are more diversified in terms <strong>of</strong> sources <strong>of</strong> income and cropping patterns.<br />

Small farmers seem to be more risk-prone and depend upon non-farm sources <strong>of</strong> income for<br />

livelihood. Here the socio-economic conditions <strong>of</strong> farmers forma decisive factor in the extent<br />

<strong>of</strong> diversification and small, marginal farmers engage in various farm as well as non-farm<br />

activities for livelihood improvement.<br />

Extension initiatives must incorporate agricultural programmes for the improvement <strong>of</strong><br />

farming systems, value chain aspects, and development <strong>of</strong> marketing infrastructure. To increase<br />

the productivity <strong>of</strong> smallholder agriculture, new innovative channels are also needed for<br />

knowledge sharing and to complement efforts in terms <strong>of</strong> organizing field days and on-farm<br />

demonstrations through intense use <strong>of</strong> print and audio media.<br />

References<br />

FAO, WFP and IFAD. 2012. The State <strong>of</strong> food insecurity in the world. Economic growth is<br />

necessary but not sufficient to accelerate the reduction <strong>of</strong> hunger and malnutrition.<br />

Rome: FAO. http://www.fao.org/3/a-i3027e.pdf.<br />

Fan, S. and Christopher, Rue. 2020. The role <strong>of</strong> smallholder farms in a Changing World. (In)<br />

Gomezy Paloma, Lauria Riosgo, Kamel and Louhichi (Eds). The role <strong>of</strong> Small farms<br />

in food and Nutrition security. ISBN 978-3030-42147-2. https://doi-org/10.1007-3-<br />

030-42148-9. 13-28.<br />

Pingali, P. L. 2012. Green Revolution: Impacts, limits, and the path ahead. Proceedings <strong>of</strong><br />

National Academy <strong>of</strong> Sciences, 109(31), 12302–12308.<br />

T6-14P-1026<br />

Institutional Innovations for Accelerating Technology Transfer: CRIDA’s<br />

Experiences<br />

C A Rama Rao * , B.M.K Raju, K. Nagasree, Josily Samuel, R.N. Kumar and V.K. Singh<br />

ICAR-Central research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, Hyderabad 500059<br />

*car.rao@icar.gov.in<br />

Sustainable agricultural development warrants a coordinated effort among multiple<br />

institutions. In fact, the remarkable achievements in Indian agriculture are a result <strong>of</strong> a<br />

coordinated effort between the research, extension, policy and other supporting organizations<br />

829 | Page Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

obviously with the ingenuity and perseverance <strong>of</strong> farmers at the core. Notwithstanding the<br />

progress <strong>of</strong> agriculture in terms <strong>of</strong> country’s journey towards self-sufficiency and export<br />

orientation, contributions to raising incomes, industrial growth etc., Indian agriculture,<br />

especially the predominant rainfed agriculture, is confronting challenges such as land<br />

degradation, climate change, rising input prices, market imperfections, international<br />

competition, labour market changes, vulnerable livelihoods, etc. Such challenges require that<br />

the research and adoption lags be shortened so that the impacts are realized quicker and the<br />

returns to investments enhanced. This calls for a much more coordinated and coherent<br />

functioning <strong>of</strong> different institutions involved in agricultural technology development and<br />

transfer.<br />

This paper reviews the experiences <strong>of</strong> ICAR-Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture<br />

(ICAR-CRIDA), with the mandate <strong>of</strong> contributing to more sustainable rainfed agriculture, in<br />

adapting her approach to research and technology transfer over time in terms <strong>of</strong> institutional<br />

innovations.<br />

Methodology<br />

The methodology involved tracing <strong>of</strong> major projects <strong>of</strong> ICAR-CRIDA in terms <strong>of</strong> their<br />

emphasis on approach to technology development and transfer and participation <strong>of</strong> various<br />

institutions over the last about thirty years.<br />

Results<br />

The word ‘institutions’ mean, in addition to the formal ‘organizations’, formal ad informal<br />

norms <strong>of</strong> how different organizations function within them and with other organizations in<br />

pursuit <strong>of</strong> (shared) mandate and goals. ICAR-CRIDA, when came into being, inherited the<br />

concept <strong>of</strong> Operational Research Project <strong>of</strong> the All India Coordinated research Project on<br />

Dryland Agriculture that had the responsibility <strong>of</strong> demonstrating and refining technologies in<br />

real farm situations. The institute was one <strong>of</strong> the first when the ICAR started to emphasize on<br />

participatory technology development in the form <strong>of</strong> the ‘Institute Village Linkage Programme’<br />

(IVLP) where in technology development is more need based and demand driven with<br />

emphasis on participation <strong>of</strong> farmers in problem identification as well as in evolving solutions.<br />

Deployment <strong>of</strong> various participatory tools, which were till then rarely used, helped scientists<br />

better appreciate the farmers’ situation and thus enabled sharpening research focus. This<br />

emphasis on farmers’ participation took a concrete shape in one <strong>of</strong> the projects funded by the<br />

Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research wherein a number <strong>of</strong> innovative tools<br />

were used to build awareness among farmers about the need for adoption <strong>of</strong> sustainable soil<br />

management practices. A more visible adaptation in approach happened when the institute<br />

started to view agricultural research in the broader context <strong>of</strong> livelihoods through a multiinstitutional<br />

effort. This effort, in the form <strong>of</strong> a research project supported by the Department<br />

Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts<br />

830 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

for International Development, United Kingdom, broadened the perspective towards livelihood<br />

betterment and partnerships to include the non-governmental organizations in a project mode.<br />

Such a partnership was also instrumental in creating an innovative community-based institution<br />

viz., salah samithi, that helped better acceptance <strong>of</strong> technologies, facilitation <strong>of</strong> smoother<br />

project delivery and implementation and save time <strong>of</strong> scientists (Rama Rao et al., 2007). The<br />

multi-institutional collaboration broadened further in the ICAR’s National Agricultural<br />

Innovation Project that included the private sector players. Thus, a well-planned multiinstitutional<br />

project enabled implementation <strong>of</strong> interventions in the areas <strong>of</strong> productivity<br />

enhancement largely supported by research organizations, better natural resource management<br />

through building community-based organizations facilitated by NGOs and strengthening<br />

market linkages and information dissemination by the private sector players. The results were<br />

visible in the form <strong>of</strong> higher productivity and incomes and better and more equitable use <strong>of</strong><br />

natural resources. One <strong>of</strong> the key interventions <strong>of</strong> such an effort was creation <strong>of</strong> local water<br />

users’ association that led to more efficient and equitable groundwater utilisation (Rama Rao<br />

et al., 2017). These experiences with institutional innovations were taken forwarded in the<br />

technology demonstration component <strong>of</strong> the ‘National Innovations in Climate Resilient<br />

Agriculture’ where in multiple village-based institutions were created to enable making and<br />

implement decisions on technology adoption (Srinivasa Rao et al., 2016). Such institutions<br />

include village climate risk management committee, custom hiring centre, seed bank, fodder<br />

bank that help deal with multiple dimensions <strong>of</strong> impacts <strong>of</strong> climate change and variability.<br />

However, not all such institutional interventions are equally effective in all locations and a<br />

comprehensive explanation to such variable performance is a question to be addressed invoking<br />

tools <strong>of</strong> social and economics science tools.<br />

Conclusion<br />

Sustainable agricultural development is increasingly complex and challenging. Efforts towards<br />

more sustainable agriculture warrants institutional interventions in terms <strong>of</strong> how different<br />

institutions work together in a complementary manner and creation <strong>of</strong> community-based<br />

organizations that help shorten research and adoption lags. However, it is important to<br />

understand the factors that facilitate or constrain effectiveness <strong>of</strong> such institutional<br />

interventions.<br />

Average time spent by scientists in dealing with community with and without ‘salah<br />

samithi’<br />

Phase <strong>of</strong> the<br />

project<br />

Without Salah<br />

Samithi<br />

With Salah samithi t value p value<br />

Early 5.97 (0.81) 5.83 (0.96) 0.41 0.68<br />

Mid 4.1 (0.51) 2.30 (0.56) 9.22


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Net returns from crop production obtained by bore well owners and water receivers<br />

before and after networking (Rs/household)<br />

Before<br />

(2008-09)<br />

After<br />

(2010-11)<br />

Difference *<br />

All farmers 7973 22011 14038 (176%)<br />

Bore well owners 18267 34601 16334 (89%)<br />

Water receivers 1438 14000 12562 (873%)<br />

Ratio <strong>of</strong> net returns <strong>of</strong> bore well owners to<br />

the water receivers<br />

12.7 2.5<br />

Gini coefficient 0.58 0.24<br />

Coefficient <strong>of</strong> variation in income (%) 128 67<br />

*<br />

All differences are significant at 1 per cent; Source: Rama Rao et al…<br />

References<br />

Rama Rao, C.A., Sreenath Dixit, G. Surendranath, K.V. Rao, B. Sanjeeva Reddy, Josily<br />

Samuel, B.M.K. Raju and B. Venkateswarlu 2017. Enabling a more equitable and<br />

efficient groundwater irrigation in rainfed regions <strong>of</strong> South India. Indian j. dryland<br />

agric. res. dev.32(1):15-20<br />

Rama Rao, C.A., Sreenath Dixit, K. Nagasree and K.V. Subrahmanyam. 2007. Institutional<br />

innovation and project delivery: A case study <strong>of</strong> Salaha Samithis. Indian j. ext. educ.<br />

43 ( 3&4), 32-36<br />

Srinivasa Rao, Ch., J.V.N.S. Prasad, M. Osman, Y.G. Prasad, D.B.V. Ramana, I. Srinivas, K.<br />

Nagasree, C.A. Rama Rao, et al., (2016). Technology Demonstrations – Enhancing<br />

resilience and adaptive capacity <strong>of</strong> farmers to climate variability. Highlights 2015-16.<br />

CRIDA, Hyderabad & NRM & AE Division, ICAR, New Delhi<br />

Need for more Flexibility in Crop Insurance Scheme (PMFBY)<br />

T6-15P-1673<br />

A. Amarender Reddy, Y. L. Meghana, Cheruku Sai Priya and Ch. Bala Swamy<br />

ICAR-CRIDA<br />

One bad crop season leads to a situation <strong>of</strong> destruction <strong>of</strong> crops, farm assets, crop losses. Crop<br />

losses force farmers to take debt from money lenders at exorbitant interest rates, leading to<br />

farm distress and ultimately farmers suicides. Farmers face different types <strong>of</strong> losses at different<br />

stages <strong>of</strong> crop growth. Crop insurance against these losses are necessary not only to cope with<br />

sudden shocks/unexpected losses to their incomes and for adoption <strong>of</strong> yield increasing<br />

technologies.<br />

Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts<br />

832 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

To insure against crop losses, government <strong>of</strong> India is implementing Prime Minister Fasal<br />

Bhima Yojana (PMFBY) scheme with a huge premium subsidy since 2016. However, after<br />

initial good response, some states are withdrawn from the scheme and started their own crop<br />

insurance scheme. Now only 21 <strong>of</strong> the 34 states are implementing this scheme while others are<br />

doing it on their end or some states don’t have any crop insurance scheme. The states like<br />

Telangana, Andhra Pradesh, Bihar, Gujarat, Jharkhand and West Bengal are withdrawn from<br />

the scheme in past few years. Since beginning <strong>of</strong> the scheme, Punjab is not participated. Under<br />

the scheme, area insured decreased from 55.0 million hectares in 2018 to 45.2 million hectares<br />

in 2021. Number <strong>of</strong> farmers are similarly decreased and now only about 3 crore farmers are<br />

participating in crop insurance out <strong>of</strong> 12 crore farmers in India. It shows there is some problems<br />

in implementation <strong>of</strong> the scheme in some states. However, some positive aspect is, recently<br />

after 4-5 years <strong>of</strong> withdrawal, both Telangana and Andhra Pradesh states are re-enrolling in to<br />

the scheme after getting assurance <strong>of</strong> universal coverage. Past experience shows that, the main<br />

reasons for withdrawal are (i) more out go as premium subsidy compared to claims received<br />

by the farmers in some states, (ii) delay in claim payments, (iii) specific needs <strong>of</strong> the states for<br />

example, in states like Punjab low risk states and crop loss is very rare due to floods or droughts,<br />

but they face hailstorms, against which they may need insurance at least cost, (iv) general lack<br />

<strong>of</strong> awareness about crop insurance among farmers and (iv) laborious and complex process <strong>of</strong><br />

determining premium levels, estimating crop loss and ultimately paying claims to farmers.<br />

The riskiness <strong>of</strong> crop production and risk bearing ability <strong>of</strong> the farmers vary significantly with<br />

the type <strong>of</strong> crops grown, irrigated and non-irrigated areas, level <strong>of</strong> commercialization, small vs<br />

big farmers and stage <strong>of</strong> development etc. Any crop insurance scheme not considering these<br />

variations in designing the schemes may suffer from low enrolments.<br />

In crop insurance, threshold yield is the basis for payment <strong>of</strong> claims. The threshold yield <strong>of</strong> a<br />

crop is equal to the average yield multiplied by the Indemnity level. Farmers get claims, only<br />

if the actual yield is below the threshold yield. Under PMFBY three levels <strong>of</strong> indemnity are<br />

applicable at90, 80 and 70 per cent. It means, claims will be given to farmers, only if the loss<br />

is more than 10, 20 and 30 per cent respectively. But, in states like Punjab, yield loss above<br />

10% rare, hence, appropriate indemnity level should be 95%, so that even if losses are 5%,<br />

farmers get claims. Punjab is not generally hit by droughts or floods but occasionally suffer<br />

due to hailstorms, to cover this farmer wants to take single peril insurance with a premium <strong>of</strong><br />

not beyond 1%, unlike uniform1.5% to 5% under PMFBY. Similarly assured irrigated areas <strong>of</strong><br />

paddy and wheat in other states are also very low risk areas, who don’t want to pay higher<br />

premium. But in contrast, in drought districts like Rayalaseema region <strong>of</strong> Andhra Pradesh or<br />

Vidarbha region <strong>of</strong> Maharashtra, or in Thar desert <strong>of</strong> Rajasthan or in cultivation <strong>of</strong> fruits and<br />

vegetable is riskier, yield loss <strong>of</strong>30% is common, hence these farmers are willing to pay higher<br />

premium for indemnity level <strong>of</strong> 30% to cover frequent losses. These types <strong>of</strong> geographical<br />

variations need to be accommodated in the PMFBY.<br />

833 | Page Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Another major problem with PMFBY is non-participation <strong>of</strong> tenant farmers. Now about 20-25<br />

per cent <strong>of</strong> operational area is cultivated by share-croppers/tenant farmers, but until now there<br />

is no pool pro<strong>of</strong> mechanism to include them as beneficiaries. Although, some states issued<br />

tenancy certificates like Loan Eligibility Cards (LEC) <strong>of</strong> Andhra Pradesh, popularity <strong>of</strong> these<br />

certificates is dismal. As a result, most <strong>of</strong> the tenant farmers are out <strong>of</strong> the PMFBY net.<br />

Similarly, in PMFBY there is a need to cover additional costs incurred by farmers in unforeseen<br />

situations. For example, in case <strong>of</strong> pest outbreak, farmers spend huge amount on purchase <strong>of</strong><br />

pesticides to save crop especially in cotton, chillies and vegetables although sometimes these<br />

operations will not result in saving the crops but adds to the cost. There is no provision to cover<br />

for these additional costs, as the sum insured is limited by scale <strong>of</strong> finance. So, situations vary<br />

significantly across geographies and crops, which force states to withdraw from the PMFBY<br />

and start their own crop insurance scheme according to local needs.<br />

These withdrawn states started their own tailor-made crop insurance schemes to suit their local<br />

conditions over the past few years. Of the schemes, Mukhyamantri Sahay Yojana <strong>of</strong> Gujarat,<br />

Bihar Rajya Fasal Sahayata Yojana (BRFSY) <strong>of</strong> Bihar, Bangla Shashya Bima (BSB) <strong>of</strong> West<br />

Bengal, YSR free crop insurance scheme and Jharkhand Fasal Rahat Yojana are at different<br />

stages <strong>of</strong> implementation and learning curve.<br />

Mukhyamantri Sahay Yojana <strong>of</strong> Gujarat, Bihar Rajya Fasal Sahayata Yojana (BRFSY) <strong>of</strong><br />

Bihar and YSR free crop insurance <strong>of</strong> Andhra Pradesh cover all the farmers with zero premium.<br />

In Gujarat, blocks are classified as two categories (i) more than 60% loss with claim <strong>of</strong><br />

Rs.25.000/ha, (ii) 33% to 60% loss with claim <strong>of</strong> Rs.20,000/ha. It seems Gujarat government<br />

scheme is simple to understand and implement. Under the scheme, big losses above 30% are<br />

only covered.<br />

Similarly, Bihar state guaranteed payment <strong>of</strong> Rs 10,000/ha if the loss was more than 20% <strong>of</strong><br />

the threshold yield. If the damage is less than 20% <strong>of</strong> the threshold limit, farmers can get Rs<br />

7,500 per hectare. However, the indemnity level was kept at 70%. It means farmers in Bihar<br />

also get claims only if yields loss is more than 30%.<br />

Bangla Shashya Bima (BSB) <strong>of</strong> West Bengal running since 2019 with Agricultural Insurance<br />

Corporation (AIC) as nodal agency. It also covers tenant farmers and share croppers. Farmers<br />

did not have to pay premium for food and oilseed crops. For potato and sugarcane, the farmers<br />

have to pay 4.85% <strong>of</strong> the sum insured as premium. Under the scheme, if claims are less than<br />

80% <strong>of</strong> the premium, AIC will refund to the state government the difference between the claims<br />

paid and 80% <strong>of</strong> the premium received. Claims depends on yield loss indirectly measured by<br />

crop health factor based on satellite and weather data collected from automatic weather stations<br />

maintained by department <strong>of</strong> agriculture. Major indicators for calculating crop health factor are<br />

crop greenness (normalized difference vegetation index), crop wetness (land surface water<br />

Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts<br />

834 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

index), crop structure (backscatter ratio) and plant canopy/ biomass (fraction <strong>of</strong> absorbed<br />

photosynthetically active radiation). Crop health data will be corroborated with yield data to<br />

check robustness.<br />

Overall, PMFBY needs to be more flexible to accommodate the wider diversity <strong>of</strong> the states.<br />

Since last few years, PMFBY improved in many respects depending on the experience and also<br />

requests from the states like online updation and direct payments, integration <strong>of</strong> data with the<br />

state portals, use <strong>of</strong> technology in loss estimation, tenant farmers coverage, timely settlement<br />

<strong>of</strong> grievances, penal interest payments to farmers for delay in claims payment and universal<br />

coverage etc. However, still a long way to go to accommodate all the states in the PMFBY.<br />

T6-16P-1053<br />

Performance and Economic Evaluation <strong>of</strong> Agri-Horti System under<br />

Rainfed Condition <strong>of</strong> Marathwada Region<br />

A.S. Gunjkar*, W.N. Narkhede, P.H. Gourkhede and M.S. Pendke<br />

All India Coordinated Research Project on Dryland Agriculture<br />

Vasantrao Naik Marathwada Agricultural University, Parbhani<br />

*amrapaliomshinde@gmail.com<br />

Drumstick is one <strong>of</strong> the important perennial vegetable (horticulture) crop grown in the region.<br />

It’s origin is the sub-Himalayan tracts <strong>of</strong> north-western India, Pakistan, drumstick can further<br />

be increased as it grow well in all types <strong>of</strong> soil, from acid to alkaline (Duke 1983) and can<br />

tolerate up to 6 months <strong>of</strong> dry season. It grows well at altitudes from 0 to 1800 msl and rainfall<br />

between 500 and 1500 mm per year. It is therefore useful for semi-arid and arid ecosystem,<br />

which covers 37.0% geographical area and 16.7% arid area (Velayutham 1999) by facilitating<br />

irrigation. In nutritional and medicinal view, almost every part <strong>of</strong> the drumstick plant has value<br />

for food. The pods, seeds, leaves and flowers are consumed by humans as nutritious vegetables<br />

in some countries (Makkar and Becker 1997). Drumstick is mainly grown for edible pods;<br />

however, it has huge commercial value for seed also as it contains 38 to 40% oil (Irvine 1961).<br />

Drumstick seed powder is said to be an effective organic clarifier <strong>of</strong> even very turbid water by<br />

removing up to 99% <strong>of</strong> bacteria in the process (Folkland and Sutherland 1996). Looking to the<br />

importance <strong>of</strong> drumstick plants, the experiment was planned in combination with crops and<br />

cropping system under agri-horti system for sustainability under rainfed ecosystem.<br />

Methodology<br />

An experiment was conducted at AICRP on Dryland Agriculture, Vasantrao Naik Marathwada<br />

Krishi Vidyapeeth, Parbhani during the year 2012-2017. The studies consisted <strong>of</strong> sole crop <strong>of</strong><br />

drumstick <strong>of</strong> distance 3x3 m. and drumstick four intercrops 1:6 ratio and their correlation with<br />

yield. The experiment was laid out in Four replication in Randomized block design.<br />

835 | Page Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Effect <strong>of</strong> Alternate land use systems on crop yield and economics<br />

Treatment Yield Cost <strong>of</strong><br />

C 1- Drumstick Sole<br />

(3x3m)<br />

C 2- Drumstick +<br />

GreeenGram (1:6)<br />

C 3- Drumstick +<br />

Soybean (1:6)<br />

C 4- Drumstick +<br />

Kharif Sorghum (1:6)<br />

C 5- Drumstick +<br />

Green mannuring<br />

(1:6)<br />

Results<br />

Drumstick<br />

Equivalent<br />

Yield (kg/ha)<br />

System<br />

Yield<br />

(q/ha)<br />

cultivation<br />

( Rs/ha)<br />

Net<br />

return<br />

( Rs/ha)<br />

B:C<br />

ratio<br />

RWUE<br />

(kg/ha-mm)<br />

107.25 107.25 25334 81916 4.23 16.86<br />

44.82 143.98 37304 106676 3.85 22.63<br />

56.27 140.52 51685 88835 2.71 22.09<br />

41.77 123.67 42670 81000 2.85 19.44<br />

149.20 149.20 29834 119367 5.01 23.45<br />

The pooled data on yield parameters and economics is presented in Table 1. Data indicated that<br />

Drumstick + Green manuring recorded the higher drumstick equivalent yield <strong>of</strong> 149.20 q/ha it<br />

was followed by Drumstick + Black gram (1:6) (140.52 q/ha) whereas in case <strong>of</strong> intercrops<br />

higher yield was recorded by soybean followed by blackgram.<br />

Weight and number <strong>of</strong> drumstick pod/plant (Pooled 2012-17)<br />

Treatment No. <strong>of</strong> sticks /plant Wt. <strong>of</strong> single stick (g)<br />

C 1- Drumstick Sole (3x3m) 169.80 57.20<br />

C 2- Drumstick + Green gram (1:6) 166.40 54.60<br />

C 3- Drumstick + Soybean (1:6) 158.60 49.20<br />

C 4- Drumstick + Kharif Sorghum (1:6) 154.00 47.40<br />

C 5- Drumstick + Green mannuring (1:6) 218.80 62.20<br />

The data depicted in Table 2 conclude that number <strong>of</strong> sticks per plant recorded significantly<br />

higher 218.80 in treatment C5- Drumstick + Green mannuring (1:6) compared to other<br />

treatments. Whereas minimum 154.00 number <strong>of</strong> sticks per plant recorded in treatment C 4-<br />

Drumstick + Kharif Sorghum (1:6).<br />

The weight <strong>of</strong> single stick found to be significantly highest 62.20g in treatment C 5- Drumstick<br />

+ Green mannuring (1:6) followed by treatment C 1- Drumstick Sole (3x3m) 57.20g. Whereas<br />

lowest weight <strong>of</strong> single stick is found in treatment C4- Drumstick + Kharif Sorghum (1:6).<br />

Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts<br />

836 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Yield <strong>of</strong> drumstick (Pooled data 2012-17)<br />

Treatment Drumstick yield (q/ha) Inter crop yield (kg/ha)<br />

C 1- Drumstick Sole (3x3m) 107.25 -<br />

C 2- Drumstick + Green gram (1:6) 99.16 804<br />

C 3- Drumstick + Soybean (1:6) 84.25 1845<br />

C 4- Drumstick + Kharif Sorghum (1:6) 81.90 2017<br />

C 5- Drumstick + Green manuring (1:6) 149.20 3745<br />

SE 3.12 --<br />

CD at 5% 9.37 --<br />

The pooled data <strong>of</strong> mean yield represented that the maximum 149.20 q/ha yield in the treatment<br />

C5- Drumstick + Green manuring (1:6) and lowest 81.90 q/ha yield in treatment C4- Drumstick<br />

+ Kharif Sorghum (1:6).<br />

Soil nutrient status under drumstick-based cropping system (Pooled data 2012-17)<br />

Treatments pH EC<br />

(ds m -1 )<br />

Org. C<br />

%<br />

Available nutrients<br />

N P K<br />

C 1- Drumstick Sole (3x3m) 8.01 0.40 0.42 193.26 10.32 567.21<br />

C 2- Drumstick + Green gram (1:6) 7.86 0.28 0.57 235.23 17.42 592.19<br />

C 3- Drumstick + Soybean (1:6) 7.97 0.40 0.48 203.83 12.24 581.46<br />

C 4- Drumstick + Kharif Sorghum (1:6) 7.97 0.38 0.51 218.80 13.68 577.56<br />

C 5- Drumstick + Green mannuring (1:6) 7.75 0.30 0.66 264.80 19.68 596.47<br />

SE ± 0.01 0.030 0.68 3.41 1.17 3.77<br />

CD at 5% NS NS 0.19 10.43 3.42 11.01<br />

Mean 7.91 0.35 0.52 223.18 14.66 582.97<br />

Data presented in Table 4 revealed that the soil pH and EC were not significantly affected due<br />

to different drumstick based intercropping systems. Whereas, improvement in soil organic<br />

carbon and over all soil major nutrients were improved over treatment C1. Significantly<br />

highest organic carbon was observed due to treatment C5 i.e. green manuring and available<br />

nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium were also higher due to growing green manuring crop with<br />

drumstick crop.<br />

Conclusion<br />

The Agri-horti system comprising Drumstick + Green mannuring (1:6) and Drumstick + Green<br />

gram are found to be superior in yield advantage and economical returns under rainfed<br />

condition <strong>of</strong> Marathwada region.<br />

837 | Page Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

References<br />

Duck, J.A. 1983. Handbook <strong>of</strong> energy crops (Moringa oleifera). Center for new crops and plant<br />

products. Purdue University, India, US.<br />

http://www.hort.purdue.edu/newcrop/duke_energy/Moringa_oleifera.html.<br />

Folkland, G.K. and Sutherland, J.P. 1996. Moringa oliefera- a multipurpose tree. Food chain,<br />

Intermediate Technology myson House, Railway terrace, Rugby, CV213HT, UK.<br />

P.18.<br />

Irvine, F.R. 1961. Woody plants <strong>of</strong> Ghana with special reference to their uses. Oxford<br />

University press, London.<br />

Makkar, H.P.S. and Becker, K. 1997. Nutrients and antiquality factors in different<br />

morphological parts <strong>of</strong> the Moringa oleifera tree. J. Agric. Sci., Cambridge 128:<br />

311–332.<br />

Velayutham, R.V. 1999. Agro-Ecological Sub-regions <strong>of</strong> India for Planning and Development.<br />

National Bureau <strong>of</strong> Soil Science and Land Use Planning (NBSSLUP), pp. 1-279.<br />

T6-17P-1074<br />

Impact <strong>of</strong> Agricultural Extension in Managing Biotic and Abiotic Stress in<br />

Rainfed Areas<br />

V. P. Suryavanshi<br />

Regional Agricultural Extension Education Centre, Ambejogai, Beed 431517, VNMAU, Maharashtra,<br />

India<br />

Various technologies are developed and recommended for management <strong>of</strong> biotic and abiotic<br />

stress in rainfed areas. Proper and timely adoption <strong>of</strong> these technologies needs to be accelerated<br />

for harvesting positive economic impacts on farmers’ fields. Among various crop production<br />

factors, management <strong>of</strong> insect pests and plant diseases are the crucial factors determining the<br />

crop yields. The climate change and weather variabilities created enormous difficulties at<br />

farmers’ level to harvest potential crop yields, mainly in soybean, redgram, gram while to some<br />

extend horticultural crops like papaya, banana and chilli grown in the region. Dryspell <strong>of</strong> more<br />

than 15 days and heavy rainfall coupled with high humidity and low solar radiation increased<br />

the infestation <strong>of</strong> stem borer in soybean, fusarium and phytophthora wilt in redgram. Wilting<br />

<strong>of</strong> gram is a major problem in the predominant soybean-gram cropping system <strong>of</strong> the region.<br />

Suboptimal micronutrients and low organic carbon content <strong>of</strong> the soil created unhealthy and<br />

virus infected growth <strong>of</strong> papaya, banana, and chilli. Extension functionaries need to work<br />

efficiently to disseminate recommended technologies effectively. Hence, it necessitates to<br />

assess the role <strong>of</strong> an extension agronomist <strong>of</strong> the Regional Agricultural Extension Education<br />

Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts<br />

838 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Centre (RAEEC) and subject matter specialist for strengthening the agricultural extension work<br />

in rainfed areas.<br />

Methodology<br />

The major crops <strong>of</strong> the Marathwada region <strong>of</strong> Maharashtra are soybean, redgram, cotton, gram.<br />

The horticultural crops like papaya, banana, tomato and chilli are also grown on limited scale.<br />

For harvesting good yield with low cost <strong>of</strong> production, various technologies viz., nutrient<br />

management, weed management, pest management water management, mechanization have<br />

been recommended by the Vasantrao Naik Marathwada Agricultural University (VNMAU),<br />

Parbhani, other SAUs and ICAR centres at regional and national level. In this regard,<br />

agricultural extension services are run by the VNMAU, Parbhani, other SAUs with the RAEEC<br />

and KVKs to transfer such technologies for adoption by farmers. The RAEEC under<br />

Directorate <strong>of</strong> Extension Education, VNMAU, Parbhani are established at Ambajogai, Latur,<br />

Aurangabad and Parbhani to disseminate the agricultural technologies among the farmers <strong>of</strong><br />

Marathwada region comprising eight districts. RAEEC developed a system to approach 60000<br />

farmers <strong>of</strong> each district in collaboration with State Agriculture Department. The need-based<br />

advisories are reaching the farmers through the system channel i.e., from scientists – SMS<br />

/extension agronomist – DSAO – Taluka Agriculture Officer –Mandal Agriculture Officer –<br />

Agriculture Supervisor – Agriculture Assistant – Farmer through conducting monthly district<br />

field visits, workshop, trainings and WhatsApp. This article considered integrated management<br />

strategies to manage biotic and abiotic stress on farmers’ fields, concluding with a brief outline<br />

<strong>of</strong> future directions which might lead to the integration <strong>of</strong> described methods in a system-based<br />

approach for more effective management <strong>of</strong> biotic and abiotic stress.<br />

Results<br />

State Agriculture Universities and ICAR research institutes have released various technologies<br />

for increasing production and productivity <strong>of</strong> rainfed areas. Technological intervention through<br />

extension activities is important for widescale adoption <strong>of</strong> these recommendations.<br />

Cropping system: Mixed cropping, intercropping and crop rotation are important practices that<br />

are widely emphasized to break the life cycle <strong>of</strong> insect pests and to avoid the inoculums buildup<br />

<strong>of</strong> soil-borne pathogens and these practices are proved to be most effective tool in real farm<br />

situations to manage biotic and abiotic stresses. Crop rotation is also associated with enhanced<br />

soil fertility, improvement in soil chemical and physical properties, good soil water<br />

management and soil erosion control.<br />

Sowing method: In soybean, use <strong>of</strong> Broad Bed and Furrow (BBF) technology for sowing is<br />

proved to be climate resilient, cost effective by reducing seed rate and insect pest population.<br />

839 | Page Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Soil amendments: Organic amendments to the soil are traditionally used for improving soil<br />

conditions and crop productivity, but they can also aid in suppressing soilborne pathogens. On<br />

farmers field, its evident that crops sown on soil with good organic amendments did not show<br />

viral expressions even though plant is infected.<br />

Soil fertility and plant nutrients: Soil fertility and chemistry including soil pH, organic matter<br />

and available nutrient statuscan play a major role for healthy growth <strong>of</strong> plant. Soil nutrition,<br />

along with the use <strong>of</strong> fertilizers and amendments, have shown direct impact for developing<br />

tolerance against various biotic and abiotic stress.<br />

Conclusion<br />

Among various crop production constraints, management <strong>of</strong> biotic and abiotic stressis the key<br />

to realizing potential crop yields in rainfed areas. The phase-out <strong>of</strong> many chemicals and rising<br />

awareness towards resistance development, environmental health, and climate change<br />

necessitates the quest for suitable integrated management options. Many non-chemical options<br />

such as resistant cultivars/varieties, cropping system, sowing methods, soil amendments, soil<br />

fertility management and plant nutrients application methods proved more effective in<br />

management <strong>of</strong> insect pests and diseases if integrated with chemical methods. Therefore,<br />

published research must be taken to farmers through such agencies as RAEEC and KVKs.<br />

T6-18P-1079<br />

Assessment <strong>of</strong> Cluster Front Line Demonstration (CFLD) on Green gram<br />

(Vigna radiata L. Wildzek) as a Climate Resilient Intervention in Rainfed<br />

Uplands <strong>of</strong> Red & Lateritic tracts <strong>of</strong> Purulia, West Bengal, India during<br />

kharif Season<br />

A. Chakraborty, S.K. Bhattacharya, B. Maity, B. Mahato, C. Ghosh, L. Maity,<br />

D.C. Mahato and B. Maiti<br />

KrishiVigyan Kendra Kalyan, Purulia, 723 147, West Bengal, India<br />

kvkkalyanpurulia@gmail.com<br />

Green gram (Vigna radiata L. Wildzek) is an important pulse crop <strong>of</strong> Purulia District <strong>of</strong> West<br />

Bengal after black gram for the unbunded rainfed uplands during Kharif season. Non-adoption<br />

<strong>of</strong> improved technologies is one <strong>of</strong> the major constraints <strong>of</strong> traditional green gram farming with<br />

lower productivity. Cluster Front Line Demonstrations (CFLD) were conducted (65 nos.) in<br />

103 farmers’ fields over an area <strong>of</strong> 22.5 ha in 14 villages, to demonstrate the production<br />

potential and economic benefits <strong>of</strong> improved technology package comprised <strong>of</strong> newly released<br />

location specific suitable varieties viz., IPM-02-14; Seed rate-25kg/ha; Seed Treatment with<br />

Trichodermaviride @50gm/ha &Pseudomonas fluorescens @ 250 gm/ha and Bi<strong>of</strong>ertilizer as<br />

Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts<br />

840 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Rhizobium @2kg/ha& PSB @ 2kg/ha; application <strong>of</strong> Fertilizer @ 20 kg N, 40 kg P 2O 5&20 kg<br />

K2O /ha as basal with Micronutrient- Zn @25kg/ha and Plant Protection measure for<br />

controlling Bihar hairy caterpillar (Spilarctiaobliqua) through spraying Azadirachtin 3 ml/lt,.<br />

The demonstrations were carried out in Purulia district <strong>of</strong> West Bengal under Red & Lateritic<br />

Agro-climatic zone during Kharif season <strong>of</strong> 2019-20 to 2021-22 for three consecutive years.<br />

The improved technologies recorded significantly higher average yield <strong>of</strong> 8.67 q/ha (57.75 %)<br />

than the yield obtained under farmer’s practices (5.50 q/ha). The improved technologies also<br />

resulted higher mean net return <strong>of</strong> Rs.39,613/ha with a cost benefit ratio <strong>of</strong> 2.25 as compared<br />

to local check (Rs.16,465/ ha, & 1.76 respectively).<br />

T6-19P-1092<br />

Computation <strong>of</strong> Extension Effectiveness Index and Effective Extension<br />

Approaches for Adoption <strong>of</strong> Rainfed Technologies by Farmers from State<br />

Dept. <strong>of</strong> Agriculture, NGO and Private Extension Agency in<br />

Anantapuramu District <strong>of</strong> A.P.<br />

K. Ravi Shankar*, G. Nirmala, K. Nagasree, P.K. Pankaj, C. N. Anshida Beevi,<br />

Jagriti Rohit, C. A. Rama Rao, B. M. K. Raju and V. K. Singh<br />

Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture (CRIDA), Hyderabad 500059, Telangana, India<br />

*kr.shankar@icar.gov.in<br />

Agricultural extension is the conscious communication <strong>of</strong> information to help farmers form<br />

sound opinions and make good decisions on farming. There are several methods for agricultural<br />

technology transfer. Some <strong>of</strong> these include the individual/household extension method, group<br />

method, and mass media method. None <strong>of</strong> these methods can be singled out as the best one as<br />

they all have some advantages and disadvantages. According to Anandajayasekeram et al.<br />

(2008), the choice <strong>of</strong> a method depends on various factors such as the tenure system in the area,<br />

community organization, and resource availability. Meetings, field days, and approaches to<br />

schools may also be good options. Despite the importance <strong>of</strong> agricultural extension in<br />

communicating relevant information about improved production techniques to farmers, there<br />

are limited studies, to the best <strong>of</strong> our knowledge, that evaluate the effectiveness <strong>of</strong> the various<br />

agricultural technology transfer methods/approaches in India in general and Andhra Pradesh<br />

(A.P.) state in particular. This paper, therefore, highlights the effectiveness <strong>of</strong> various<br />

agricultural technology transfer (extension approaches) that are being used by the stakeholders<br />

<strong>of</strong> the agricultural extension delivery system in the Anantapuramu district <strong>of</strong> A.P. The specific<br />

objectives <strong>of</strong> the study were to compute the extension effectiveness index from farmers <strong>of</strong> the<br />

study area and to identify the existing extension approaches employed by extension <strong>of</strong>ficers <strong>of</strong><br />

different agencies in the study area.<br />

841 | Page Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Methodology<br />

A sample <strong>of</strong> 40 farmers was randomly selected from the Anantapuramu district <strong>of</strong> A.P. The<br />

average annual rainfall in Anantapuramu is 550 mm. The sample agencies selected for the study<br />

were Watershed Support Services and Activities Network (WASSAN) an NGO, Coromandel<br />

Fertilizers Limited (CFL) a private extension firm, and the State Department <strong>of</strong> Agriculture<br />

(SDA) representing the government extension agency. In Anantapuramu, Nallacheruvu<br />

(WASSAN), Bukkarayasamudram (CFL), and Atmakur (SDA) mandals were selected for the<br />

study. Care was taken in selecting the mandals (along with villages and respondent farmers)<br />

that were mutually exclusive to avoid overlapping <strong>of</strong> data from each agency i.e., Nallacheruvu<br />

was selected to collect data from WASSAN, Bukkarayasamudram for CFL and Atmakur for<br />

data from SDA. The data was collected using a pre-tested interview schedule and focus group<br />

discussion with the farmers belonging to each agency. The extension effectiveness index<br />

comprised six parameters i.e., timeliness <strong>of</strong> information, utility, ease <strong>of</strong> understanding,<br />

satisfaction in farmers, extension activities, and quality <strong>of</strong> extension services. These parameters<br />

were further subdivided into components and individual weights were assigned to each<br />

component. The weights were rounded to the nearest fifth digit. For each parameter, all<br />

components’ weights were totalled 100. Mean weightages for each parameter were worked out<br />

and they were combined to get the index value to 100. Out <strong>of</strong> the six parameters, utility ranked<br />

first with 25 scores, followed by the timeliness <strong>of</strong> information, ease <strong>of</strong> understanding, and<br />

satisfaction in farmers each with 20 scores, then extension activities with 10 and quality <strong>of</strong><br />

extension services with 5 scores respectively.<br />

Results<br />

The main crops in the study villages are ground nut, red gram, paddy, banana, tomato, and<br />

other vegetables. The mean Extension Effectiveness Index (EEI) value <strong>of</strong> 4.1 was the highest<br />

for WASSAN, followed by SDA (3.79) and CFL (3.52) in that order. In terms <strong>of</strong> the measured<br />

6 parameters in the index, it is clear that extension was highly effective in WASSAN, followed<br />

by SDA and CFL in that order. The study revealed significant differences between different<br />

agencies based on their EEI values.<br />

T test results for different extension agencies based on EEI values<br />

S. No. Extension Agencies<br />

Comparison<br />

Mean Difference t value Sig. (2-tailed)<br />

1. CFL vs WASSAN -0.591 -9.08 0.001**<br />

2. CFL vs SDA -0.276 -4.12 0.001**<br />

3. WASSAN vs SDA -0.315 -15.50 0.001**<br />

**Significant at 0.01 probability level<br />

Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts<br />

842 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

The major extension approaches that were used to transmit information to farmers are given in<br />

the table. Farmer to Farmer Extension (FFE) followed by demonstrations, training, group<br />

meetings and exposure visits (group approaches) were highly effective extension approaches<br />

in that order.<br />

Effectiveness <strong>of</strong> extension approaches in Anantapuramu district <strong>of</strong> AP.<br />

S. No. Extension Approaches N Mean<br />

1. Demonstrations 120 3.67<br />

2. Trainings 120 2.86<br />

3. Exposure Visits 40 1<br />

4. Group Meetings 80 2.82<br />

5. Farmer-to-Farmer Extension 40 4.9<br />

Results from Ewbank et al. (2007) also concur with our findings. The FFE approach has the<br />

potential <strong>of</strong> supplementing existing extension approaches and improves farmers’ access to<br />

extension services. FFE is effective in serving farmers’ needs, institutionally more sustainable,<br />

comparably inexpensive, and used in areas where it is inadequate or absent <strong>of</strong> government<br />

extension staff. Furthermore, it is also thought to reach and include many poor farmers, thus<br />

increasing the adoption <strong>of</strong> technologies.<br />

Conclusion<br />

In this study, we computed the EEI as well as the extension approaches in the Anantapuramu<br />

district <strong>of</strong> A.P. The EEI was highest for WASSAN. Farmers also expressed that FFE followed<br />

by demonstrations, training, group meetings, and exposure visits were highly effective<br />

extension approaches in the study. It therefore imperative that the agricultural policies <strong>of</strong> A.P.<br />

should be aimed at empowering the Agricultural department, both technically and financially,<br />

to train farmers through FFE, Demonstrations, Trainings, Group meetings and Exposure visits<br />

since these group approaches have proven to be effective in disseminating information to<br />

farmers in real-time Technology-led approaches like Information and Communication<br />

Technologies (ICTs) (like mobile, SMS, individual (individual farmer or household) and mass<br />

media approaches (like TV, radio) was shown less preference by farmers in information<br />

seeking in the study.<br />

References<br />

Ackah-Nyamike, E. E., 2007. Extension programme development and implementation: A<br />

fundamental guide for tertiary students and practitioners. Accra: Sedco Publishing Ltd.<br />

Anandajayasekeram, P., Puskur, R., Sindu, W., and Hoekstra, D. 2008. Concepts and practices<br />

in agricultural extension in developing countries: A source book. Nairobi, Kenya:<br />

843 | Page Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI), Washington, DC, U.S.A, and<br />

International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI).<br />

Ewbank, R., Kasindei, A., Kimaro, F. and Slaa, S. 2007. Farmer Participatory Research in<br />

Northern Tanzania. FARM-Africa Working Paper No. 11.<br />

T6-20P-1118<br />

Performance <strong>of</strong> Frontline Demonstrations in Yield Enhancement <strong>of</strong> Cotton<br />

under Arid Conditions<br />

Arvind Singh Tetarwal*<br />

ICAR-CAZRI, Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Pali-Marwar-306401 (Rajasthan)<br />

*astetarwal@gmail.com<br />

Cotton, Gossypium sp. (Family: Malvaceae) is an important commercial fibre crop grown<br />

under diverse agro-climatic conditions. India ranks first in the world cotton production with 34<br />

million bales from about 12 million hectares. India's average cotton production is 469 kg per<br />

hectare, compared to world average 778 kg ha -1 . Gujarat is a major cotton producing state. In<br />

arid Kutch, Gujarat, the main limiting constraints in cotton production includes low soil<br />

fertility, shortage and poor-quality irrigation water, high prevalence <strong>of</strong> insect-pests and<br />

soilborne diseases etc. The cultivation <strong>of</strong> susceptible hybrids, late planting, inadequate fertiliser<br />

use, and insecticide spraying were some <strong>of</strong> the major abiotic factors for insect-pest outbreaks<br />

(Kranthi, 2015). It was observed that majority <strong>of</strong> farmers did not use improved practices like<br />

quality seed, suitable plant protection measures, balanced fertilization resulting in a wide<br />

extension gap between demonstrated technology and farmers' technique. To bridge that gap,<br />

KVK Bhuj demonstrated improved cotton cultivation technology in various farmers' fields as<br />

FLDs, which focuses on increasing productivity by providing vital inputs as well as improved<br />

packages <strong>of</strong> practices.<br />

Methodology<br />

The current study was conducted by the ICAR-CAZRI, Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Bhuj-Kutch<br />

(Gujarat) during the Kharif, 2018-19 to 2020-21 at farmer’s fields. A total <strong>of</strong> 60 frontline<br />

demonstrations were held throughout a 24-hectare area at different villages <strong>of</strong> the Kutch<br />

district. The soils in the research area were mostly saline and alkaline in nature, with a sandyto-sandy<br />

loam texture and poor in essential micro nutrients and organic carbon. The yield data<br />

was obtained from FLD plots along with local farming practises widely used by farmers in this<br />

region, for comparative analysis. Under demonstration plots, we have provided critical inputs<br />

such as bio-pesticide Beauveria bassiana, traps (pheromone and yellow sticky traps) to manage<br />

the pink bollworm and sucking insects, magnesium sulphate (MgSO4) and technical advice on<br />

integrated crop management (ICM). On the other hand, farmers were allowed to continue with<br />

Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts<br />

844 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

their conventional techniques in the event <strong>of</strong> a local check. Statistical tools such as frequency and<br />

percentage were used to collect, tabulate, and analyse the data. The extension gap, technology gap, and<br />

technology index were calculated using the Samui et al. (2000) equations.<br />

Results<br />

The demonstrations showed that the three-year average production in demonstrated technology (2561<br />

kg ha -1 ) was 13.89% greater than in conventional practise (2241 kg ha -1 ). The extension gap between<br />

improved and conventional practise varied between 312 and 330 kg ha -1 , with an average <strong>of</strong> 320.3 kg<br />

ha -1 . The extension gap was recorded at its lowest (312 kg ha -1 ) in the second year 2019-20, indicating<br />

the greater adoption <strong>of</strong> superior technologies <strong>of</strong> the KVK. The findings <strong>of</strong> Dahiya et al. (2018)<br />

corroborate the conclusions <strong>of</strong> this study. Furthermore, the technology gap was 438.7 kg ha -1 on average<br />

with lowest 327 kg ha -1 recorded in the beginning year (2028-19) <strong>of</strong> the study. The statistics obtained<br />

show that the technology index peaked at 21.23% in 2020-21 and lowest (10.9%) in 2018-19. The<br />

average technology index across the years was 14.62%. A technology's acceptability and practicality<br />

are always inversely related to its technology index value; the higher the acceptance <strong>of</strong> the proven<br />

technology, the lower the technology index value (Sagar and Chandra, 2004).<br />

Conclusion<br />

The use <strong>of</strong> Beauveria bassiana and balanced fertilization contributed to high cotton production at low<br />

cost. It is recommended that strong ties be established with line departments and other agencies in order<br />

to organise FLDs and large-scale capacity development programmes to overcome the extension gap for<br />

better cotton productivity by transferring improved technology to the region.<br />

References<br />

Dahiya, R., Yadav, S. and Yadav, S. 2018. Impact <strong>of</strong> frontline demonstration on cotton production<br />

technology. J. Cotton Res. Dev., 32 (2): 300-305.<br />

Kranthi KR (2015). Cotton statistics and News. Cotton Association <strong>of</strong> India, Mumbai, India.<br />

Sagar RL and Chandra R (2004). Front line demonstration on sesame in West Bengal. Agric Ext Review<br />

16(2): 7-10.<br />

Samui SK, Maitra S, Roy DK, Mandal AK and Saha D (2000). Evaluation <strong>of</strong> front-line demonstration<br />

on groundnut. J Indian Soc Coast Agric Res 18(2): 180-183.<br />

Yield, gap assessment and economic analysis <strong>of</strong> frontline demonstrations on cotton<br />

Year<br />

No. <strong>of</strong><br />

Demo<br />

Demo<br />

(IP)*<br />

Yield<br />

(kg/ha)<br />

Local<br />

(FP)<br />

Yield<br />

(kg/ha)<br />

% Yield<br />

Increase<br />

over FP<br />

Ext<br />

Gap<br />

(kg/ha)<br />

Tech.<br />

Gap<br />

(kg/ha)<br />

Tech.<br />

Index<br />

(%)<br />

Net Return<br />

(Rs/ha)<br />

B:C Ratio<br />

IP* FP IP FP<br />

2018-19 20 2673 2343 14.08 330 327 10.90 101415 84865 3.22 2.93<br />

2019-20 20 2648 2336 13.36 312 352 11.73 100690 85080 3.24 2.96<br />

2020-21 20 2363 2044 14.22 319 637 21.23 82065 65470 2.71 2.39<br />

Average 2561 2241 13.89 320.3 438.7 14.62 94723 78471 3.06 2.76<br />

*IP=Improved Practice; FP= Farmers Practice<br />

845 | Page Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

T6-21P-1138<br />

Sustainable Growth in Agriculture Sector: A Case Study <strong>of</strong> Nalgonda<br />

District, Telangana, India<br />

Harish Balduri* and G. Prabhakar<br />

Geology Department<br />

Osmania University, Hyderabad<br />

*harishbalduri.ougeog@gmail.com, drgprabhakarouhyd@gmail.com<br />

Sustainable agricultural growth is a necessary for the economic growth <strong>of</strong> India. Agriculture<br />

growth is critical for poverty reduction and can be a powerful means <strong>of</strong> achieving economic<br />

growth. The agriculture sector is one <strong>of</strong> the main sectors in India by which agriculture<br />

productivity and rural employment can <strong>of</strong>fer increased income to the poor and provide food<br />

security and income diversification to vulnerable communities. The study focuses on the<br />

Nalgonda district, a rural district with good irrigation sources and favorable climatic conditions.<br />

Approximately 75 per cent <strong>of</strong> the population depends directly or indirectly on agriculture in the<br />

district. The major growing crops are Paddy and Cotton. As per the field observation, the district<br />

has the highest potential for crop cultivation and diversification due to the relatively gentle<br />

topographic condition, favorable soils and higher irrigation facilities <strong>of</strong> Krishna River. The<br />

present study showed that despite several challenges, such as an increase in built-up areas and<br />

scarcity <strong>of</strong> cropland in the study area, there has still been an increase in agricultural productivity<br />

in the last decade. The present study aims to study the sustainable agricultural growth in the<br />

Nalgonda district and propose several measures to guarantee sustainable agricultural growth in<br />

the stud area. The result <strong>of</strong> the study provides an action plan for agricultural researchers,<br />

academia, research institute, government, and non-governmental organizations working in the<br />

agriculture sector.<br />

T6-22P-1164<br />

On Farm Evaluation <strong>of</strong> Farming System Modules for Improving the<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>itability <strong>of</strong> Small and Marginal Farmers<br />

Y. D. Charjan, R. S. Wankhade, Varsha Tapre, P. N. Magare and A. S. Lawhale<br />

Agriculture Research Station, Achalpur<br />

Dr. Panjabrao Deshmukh Krishi Vidyapeeth, Akola<br />

The Central Vidarbha Zone is the VII th Agro Climatic zone <strong>of</strong> Maharashtra State, this tract has<br />

hot summer, moderate winter and rainy season. Vertisols, Inceptisols and Entisols are the<br />

dominant soil order occurring here. Soil type in the district having deep black, medium deep<br />

black and shallow soils having 427.9, 136.4 and 421.5 (area 000 ha) hectare area with 43.4,<br />

13.8 and 42.7 per cent, respectively. Main agronomical crop <strong>of</strong> this zone are cotton, soybean,<br />

sorghum, pigeon pea in kharif and wheat and gram in rabi season. Nagpur mandarin and<br />

vegetable crops viz., brinjal, tomato grown in Nagpur district. During 2018-19 the experiments<br />

Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts<br />

846 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

were conducted in high (Katol) and low (Narkhed) productive blocks <strong>of</strong> Nagpur district. The<br />

total 36 farmers selected for study accordingly principle component analysis was done.<br />

Systematic integration <strong>of</strong> multiple enterprise system in scientific manner, components needs to<br />

be chosen in such a way that a product <strong>of</strong> on component become the input <strong>of</strong> other, are<br />

complimentary and are organically well inter linked to each other without wastage to meet out<br />

the multiple objective <strong>of</strong> poverty reduction, food security, environmental soundness and<br />

sustainability, especially for small and marginal farmers. After studying typology <strong>of</strong> collected<br />

information <strong>of</strong> selected farmers, components were defined. Increasing income and employment<br />

from small holdings by integrating wages from enterprises and recycling crop residues and byproducts<br />

within farm itself. The type <strong>of</strong> farming system and components presented in the table 1.<br />

Types <strong>of</strong> Farming Systems and Components<br />

Farming<br />

System<br />

(s)<br />

No. <strong>of</strong><br />

households<br />

Mean<br />

holding<br />

size (ha)<br />

Mean<br />

family<br />

size<br />

(no’s)<br />

Components<br />

Cropping systems Livestock Mean total<br />

net income<br />

(Rs)<br />

Crop +Bullock<br />

pair<br />

3 0.93 4<br />

Soy + Pigeon Pea (1)<br />

Soy-ch.pea(1)<br />

soy-wheat(2)<br />

Bullock pair<br />

(1)<br />

95000<br />

Crop+ Dairy 3 1.33 6<br />

Soybean (1)<br />

Cotton-fallow (1)<br />

Soy-ch.pea(1)<br />

soy-wheat(1)<br />

Cow (1) 88333<br />

Crop +<br />

Horticulture<br />

+Dairy and<br />

Bullock pair<br />

6 1.37 5<br />

Cotton-wheat (1)<br />

Cotton-fallow (3)<br />

Soy + Pigeon Pea (2)<br />

Soy-ch.pea(3)<br />

soy-wheat(2)<br />

Cow &<br />

Bullock pair<br />

(1 & 1 )<br />

82333<br />

Benchmark status <strong>of</strong> area & net income from various modules.<br />

Farming System (s)<br />

Benchmark net income (Rs)<br />

Crop Livestock Processing Optional if<br />

any<br />

Total<br />

Crop +Bullock pair 80000 15000 0 0 95000<br />

Crop+ Dairy 66183 22150 0 0 88333<br />

Crop + Horticulture +Dairy<br />

and Bullock pair<br />

57767 24566 0 0 82333<br />

847 | Page Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Salient features <strong>of</strong> interventions for diversification in each module.<br />

Farming<br />

System<br />

Diversification<br />

module<br />

Constraints Interventions Cost <strong>of</strong><br />

interev.<br />

(Rs)<br />

Net<br />

returns<br />

(Rs)<br />

interv.<br />

Crop +<br />

Bullock pair<br />

Crop<br />

Imbalanced Fertilizer<br />

Dose, Monoculturing <strong>of</strong><br />

soybean , High incidence<br />

<strong>of</strong> pest. Sole cropping<br />

Supply Of MAUS 71<br />

var. <strong>of</strong> and JAKI<br />

9218 Soybean and<br />

chickpea var.,<br />

balancing nutrients<br />

1935 141552<br />

Livestock<br />

Unavailability <strong>of</strong> green<br />

fodder, use <strong>of</strong> Local<br />

breed, lack <strong>of</strong> knowledge<br />

about improved breeds,<br />

nutritional, rearing<br />

management and<br />

vaccination schedule<br />

Usmanabadi goat,<br />

(awaited)Hybrid<br />

Napier saplings.<br />

Vaccination,<br />

Deworming<br />

100 2250<br />

Processing<br />

lack <strong>of</strong> knowledge about,<br />

processing <strong>of</strong><br />

fortification, nonavailability<br />

<strong>of</strong> cheap<br />

mineral mixture Partial<br />

decomposed FYM<br />

Fortification <strong>of</strong><br />

wheat flour,<br />

preparation <strong>of</strong><br />

mineral mixture<br />

supply <strong>of</strong> bio agent<br />

for composting.<br />

Preparation.<br />

250<br />

Use at<br />

Own Farm<br />

Optional<br />

Unawareness about use Supply <strong>of</strong> dry land<br />

<strong>of</strong> Farm bunds for minor/ horticultural fruit<br />

dry land horticultural plants saplings.<br />

plants<br />

Supply <strong>of</strong> improved<br />

Local ber, unavailability variety <strong>of</strong> ber bud<br />

<strong>of</strong> fresh vegetable around and Bio<br />

the year.<br />

decomposers.<br />

720 3225<br />

Crop+<br />

Dairy<br />

Crop<br />

Imbalanced Fertilizer<br />

Dose, Mono-culturing <strong>of</strong><br />

soybean, High incidence<br />

<strong>of</strong> pest and disease, Sole<br />

cropping<br />

Supply Of Js 9305<br />

var. <strong>of</strong> and Wheat<br />

var. AKW<br />

1071Soybean,<br />

balancing nutrients ,<br />

8985 118657<br />

Livestock<br />

Unavailability <strong>of</strong> mineral Usmanabadi goat,<br />

mixtures, vaccination and (awaited) Hybrid<br />

green<br />

fodder throughout year<br />

Napier saplings.<br />

Vaccination,<br />

lack <strong>of</strong> knowledge about Deworming 617 8710<br />

improved breeds,<br />

nutritional, rearing<br />

management and<br />

vaccination schedule<br />

Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts<br />

848 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Processing<br />

lack <strong>of</strong> knowledge about,<br />

processing <strong>of</strong><br />

fortification, nonavailability<br />

<strong>of</strong> cheap<br />

mineral mixture, Partial<br />

decomposed FYM<br />

Fortification <strong>of</strong><br />

wheat flour,<br />

preparation <strong>of</strong><br />

mineral mixture,<br />

supply <strong>of</strong> bio agent<br />

for composting.<br />

Preparation<br />

250<br />

Use at<br />

Own Farm<br />

Optional<br />

Unawareness about use Supply <strong>of</strong> dry land<br />

<strong>of</strong> Farm bunds for minor/ horticultural fruit<br />

dry land horticultural plants saplings.<br />

plants<br />

Supply <strong>of</strong> improved<br />

Local ber, unavailability variety <strong>of</strong> ber bud<br />

<strong>of</strong> fresh vegetable around and Bio<br />

the year.<br />

decomposers.<br />

720 2490<br />

Crop +<br />

Horticulture<br />

+Dairy and<br />

Bullock pair<br />

Crop<br />

Imbalanced Fertilizer<br />

Dose, Mono-culturing <strong>of</strong><br />

soybean,<br />

Supply Of MAUS 71<br />

var. <strong>of</strong> 3722<br />

Soybean, balancing<br />

nutrients, in<br />

8717 130283<br />

Horticulture<br />

Supply <strong>of</strong> disease<br />

resistant planting<br />

material and<br />

phytophthera<br />

management kit<br />

Intercropped with high<br />

valued vegetable crops.<br />

Supply20 saplings <strong>of</strong><br />

disease resistant<br />

from Genuine<br />

source. Neem cake<br />

300 kg, Metalaxil M-<br />

72 20 gm, 1 kg, SSP<br />

and ammonium<br />

sulphate, 500gm<br />

MOP 20kg,<br />

potassium<br />

paramagnet 12.5gm,<br />

copper sulphate100<br />

gm calcium<br />

carbonate 100gm,<br />

and trichoderma<br />

100gm. supply <strong>of</strong><br />

seedlings or seed <strong>of</strong><br />

improved variety <strong>of</strong><br />

cabbage, pusa drum<br />

head or available in<br />

market<br />

Livestock<br />

vaccination, and green<br />

fodder throughout year<br />

lack <strong>of</strong> knowledge about<br />

improved breeds,<br />

nutritional, rearing<br />

management and<br />

vaccination schedule<br />

Usmanabadi goat,<br />

(awaited) supply <strong>of</strong><br />

hybrid Napier<br />

saplings.<br />

Vaccination,<br />

Deworming supply<br />

<strong>of</strong><br />

790 9600<br />

849 | Page Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Processing<br />

Non availability <strong>of</strong> cheap<br />

mineral mixture, Partial<br />

decomposed FYM<br />

Preparation <strong>of</strong><br />

mineral mixture,<br />

supply <strong>of</strong> bio agent<br />

for composting.<br />

Preparation.<br />

250<br />

Use at<br />

Own Farm<br />

optional<br />

Unawareness about use<br />

<strong>of</strong> Farm bunds for minor/<br />

dry land horticultural<br />

plants<br />

Local ber, unavailability<br />

<strong>of</strong> fresh vegetable around<br />

the year. Mismanagement<br />

<strong>of</strong> compost<br />

Fortification <strong>of</strong><br />

wheat flour,<br />

preparation <strong>of</strong><br />

mineral mixture.<br />

Supply <strong>of</strong> seeds for<br />

kitchen gardening.<br />

Training on methods<br />

<strong>of</strong> compost making<br />

Improvement <strong>of</strong> total net income (Rs)<br />

520 1000<br />

Farming Systems<br />

Holding<br />

size (ha)<br />

Benchmark<br />

Net income (Rs)<br />

(From 0.20 ha )<br />

First year<br />

Crop +Bullock pair 0.93 95000 141552<br />

Crop+ Dairy 1.33 88333 118657<br />

Crop + Horticulture +Dairy and Bullock<br />

pair<br />

1.37 82333 130283<br />

Use <strong>of</strong> improvement in existing farming system and diversification in components <strong>of</strong> farming system<br />

showed rise in net income <strong>of</strong> farmers over farmers practice which they adopted earlier. A highest net<br />

monetary return <strong>of</strong> Rs.141552 was recorded by field crop + Bullock pair farming system. In the studied<br />

group <strong>of</strong> farmers the Field crop +Horticulture + Dairy and Bullock pair is second highest pr<strong>of</strong>itable<br />

farming system. This System recorded Rs. 130283 net monetary returns over before intervention in the<br />

various components <strong>of</strong> Field crop +Horticulture + Dairy and Bullock pair farming system. Part <strong>of</strong><br />

expenditure on livestock and on-farm processing and optional module was made in this year but results<br />

are awaited. Complete expenditure on these modules i.e. on livestock, optional module in both the<br />

blocks is not completed. Lower increase i.e. only 34 % increase was observed in Field crop + Dairy<br />

farming system after intervention in crop + Dairy components. However, income was raised by farmers<br />

due to adopting the diversification in cropping system.<br />

Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts<br />

850 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

T6-23P-1182<br />

Evaluation <strong>of</strong> Suitable Cropping Sequence for Dry Tracts in Prakasam<br />

District <strong>of</strong> Andhra Pradesh<br />

L. Rajesh Chowdary, S. Bharathi and G. Subba Rao<br />

Agricultural Research Station Darsi, Prakasam, Andhra Pradesh<br />

ars.darsi@angrau.ac.in<br />

Proper use <strong>of</strong> the vital natural resources influences the existence <strong>of</strong> life systems and socioeconomic<br />

development <strong>of</strong> any country. Land suitability evaluation is the process <strong>of</strong><br />

estimating the potential <strong>of</strong> land for land use planning (Sys et al. 1991). Continuous growing<br />

<strong>of</strong> same crop on the same field cause deficiency <strong>of</strong> a particular nutrient in the soil due to<br />

continuous removal <strong>of</strong> a specific nutrient from a specific depth <strong>of</strong> the soil, also cause<br />

dominance <strong>of</strong> a particular insect or disease or weed in crop because <strong>of</strong> continuous available<br />

favourable conditions and host plant which leads severe reduction in crop yield. Since long,<br />

conventional cropping <strong>of</strong> rice under medium to heavy textured soils under bore wells and<br />

single crop <strong>of</strong> pigeonpea or fallow. Bengal gram or single crop <strong>of</strong> bajra/foxtail millet in light<br />

textured soils under rainfed conditions is being followed in most <strong>of</strong> the areas <strong>of</strong> Prakasam<br />

district. However, each plant species requires specific soil and climatic conditions for its<br />

optimum growth. Information on crop sequence suitability in dry tracts <strong>of</strong> Prakasam district<br />

in particular and in Andhra Pradesh in general is very much scanty. In India, it is observed<br />

that the area and production <strong>of</strong> millets has decreased and this might be due to lack <strong>of</strong><br />

remunerative prices, timely marketing facilities and hence diversifying to commercial crops<br />

like cotton, chillies, maize and maize-based cropping systems. To achieve sustainable<br />

production in terms <strong>of</strong> ecological, economical and biological sustainability millet-based<br />

cropping systems can be followed (Chandra et al., 2013). Millets are mainly cultivated as<br />

single crop during Kharif in Prakasam district under rainfed conditions with minimum<br />

management and the fields are left fallow during Rabi. Hence, an attempt has been made to<br />

evaluate the suitable millet-based cropping sequence in dry tracts <strong>of</strong> Prakasam district,<br />

Andhra Pradesh to utilize the available resources and improve the socio- economic status <strong>of</strong><br />

dry land farmers.<br />

Methodology<br />

Agricultural Research Station, Darsi is located in between 14 o 57′ and 16 o 17′ North latitude<br />

and 78 o 43′ and 80 o 25′ East longitude. The climate is semi-arid with distinct summer, winter<br />

and rainy seasons. The field experiment was conducted for two consecutive years at<br />

Agricultural Research Station, Darsi during 2017-18 and 2018-19. The soil at the<br />

experimental site in sandy loam in texture and low in organic carbon content (0.20%). The<br />

experiment was laid out in Randomized Block Design with three replications. The<br />

experiment comprised <strong>of</strong> nine treatments (foxtail millet-bengalgram, foxtail millet -cowpea,<br />

851 | Page Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

foxtail millet -safflower, bajra-bengalgram, bajra -cowpea, bajra –safflower, finger milletbengalgram,<br />

finger millet –cowpea and finger millet -safflower) having different crop<br />

sequences <strong>of</strong> which first crop was sown during Kharif and second crop in Rabi with a<br />

recommended spacing <strong>of</strong> 30 cm x10 cm. The varieties Suryanandi (foxtail millet),<br />

Champavathi (finger millet) and bajra (ABV-5) were used during Kharif and during Rabi<br />

cowpea (TPT-5), safflower (Local) and JG-11 (bengalgram) were used in the two years <strong>of</strong><br />

study. Observations on yield was recorded and equivalent yields along with net returns and<br />

B: C ratio was computed.<br />

Results<br />

The compiled data <strong>of</strong> the two years study revealed that among the Kharif crops (foxtail<br />

millet, bajra, finger millet) the maximum bajra equivalent yield was recorded in bajra (2706-<br />

2753 kg/ha) followed by foxtail (2487- 2574 kg/ha) and lowest in finger millet (2097-2255<br />

kg/ha). In Rabi crops highest cowpea equivalent yield was recorded in cowpea (1030-1293<br />

kg/ha) followed by bengalgram and safflower. Among the different crop sequences<br />

evaluated maximum system yield was recorded with bajra- cowpea sequence (4032 kg/ha)<br />

followed by bajra-bengalgram (3827 kg/ha) and was significantly superior over the other<br />

crop sequences with net returns <strong>of</strong> 65181 Rs/ha (B: C ratio 2.41), 55319 Rs/ha (B: ratio 2.14)<br />

respectively.Similarly, higher system productivity in terms <strong>of</strong> bengalgram equivalent yield<br />

was also reported by Lal et al. (2004) in a millet-bengalgram crop sequence.<br />

System yield (kg/ha), net returns (Rs) and benefit cost ratio as influenced by different<br />

crop sequences<br />

Bajra Cowpea<br />

Crop equivalent equivalent<br />

System Gross<br />

Net Returns<br />

sequences yield kg/ha yield kg/ha<br />

yield Returns<br />

B:C Ratio<br />

(Rs/ha)<br />

(kg/ha) (Rs/ha)<br />

(Kharif) (Rabi)<br />

Foxtail<br />

millet-<br />

Bengalgram<br />

Foxtail<br />

millet -<br />

Cowpea<br />

Foxtail<br />

millet -<br />

Safflower<br />

Bajra-<br />

Bengalgram<br />

Bajra-<br />

Cowpea<br />

Bajra-<br />

Safflower<br />

2574 1005 3579 96264 47864 1.99<br />

2487 1030 3517 95487 49137 2.06<br />

2533 415 2948 70623 26323 1.59<br />

2715 1112 3827 103719 55319 2.14<br />

2753 1279 4032 111531 65181 2.41<br />

2706 404 3110 73794 29494 1.67<br />

Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts<br />

852 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Finger<br />

millet-<br />

Bengalgram<br />

Finger<br />

millet-<br />

Cowpea<br />

Finger<br />

millet-<br />

Safflower<br />

2255 957 3212 87549 39149 1.81<br />

2097 1293 3390 98343 51993 2.12<br />

2144 397 2541 61698 17398 1.39<br />

S.Em ± 72.30 17.25 90.95<br />

CD (0.05) 215.90 55.78 274.68<br />

CV (%) 13.50 12.77 18.25<br />

Price (Rs/q): foxtail millet-2100, bajra-2100, finger millet-1930, bengalgram-3800, cowpea-<br />

4200, safflower-2100<br />

Conclusion<br />

Bajra-cowpea and bajra-bengal gram were found to be most pr<strong>of</strong>itable cropping sequences<br />

evaluated in terms <strong>of</strong> bajra equivalent yields and ne returns.<br />

References<br />

Chandra, A., Kandari, L.S., Vikram, S.N., Maikhuri, R.K., and Rao, K.S., 2013, Role <strong>of</strong><br />

Intercropping on production and land use efficiency in the central Himalaya, India.<br />

India. Environ. We Int. J. Sci. Tech., 8(2): 105-113.<br />

Lal, M., D.S. Bhati and A.K. Nag. 2004. Economics and production potential <strong>of</strong> different<br />

cropping sequence on farmers’ field. Journal <strong>of</strong> Eco-Physiology. 7(3/4): 143–145.<br />

Sys, C., Van Ranst, E., Debaveye, J., 1991, Land evaluation, Part 2 Methods in Land<br />

Evaluation. Agricultural Publications No.7, Belgium.<br />

T6-24P-1200<br />

Dynamics <strong>of</strong> Agricultural Land Use in Kerala - A Socio-Ecological<br />

Perspective<br />

Rose Mathews, Binoo P Bonny and Marneni Divya Sree<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Agricultural Extension, College <strong>of</strong> Agriculture, Vellanikkara, Kerala<br />

Agricultural University-680656<br />

The total geographical area <strong>of</strong> Kerala is 38.86 lakh ha, out <strong>of</strong> which the area under agriculture<br />

accounts for 52.13 per cent (GoK, 2022). Though agriculture continues to be the major land<br />

use form in the state, the net sown area shows a declining trend. The objectives <strong>of</strong> the study are<br />

853 | Page Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

a) to delineate trends in agricultural land transition in Kerala and b) to identify socio-ecological<br />

determinants <strong>of</strong> agricultural land use change in Kerala.<br />

Methodology<br />

Ten food crops viz. Rice, sugarcane, pepper, ginger, turmeric, cardamom, areca nut, tapioca,<br />

banana and other plantains and cashew, and five non-food crops, viz. sesamum, coconut, tea,<br />

c<strong>of</strong>fee and rubber were selected for the study. Data on the area under food crops and non-food<br />

crops were collected from the India stat website and <strong>of</strong> the department <strong>of</strong> economics and<br />

statistics.<br />

Results<br />

The significant changes in the land use pattern <strong>of</strong> Kerala are the shift from cultivation <strong>of</strong> food<br />

crops to non-food crops, increase in area under non-agricultural use and fallowing <strong>of</strong><br />

agricultural land. It is evident from Fig. that over the years, the area under food crops has<br />

declined while that <strong>of</strong> non-food crops has increased. The area under food crops started<br />

declining during 1970-71 and 1980-81, while the area under non-food crops during the period<br />

started increasing. The area under non-food crops crossed the food crops in 1990-91. Similar<br />

trend was observed during 1990-91 to 2000-2001. From 2000-01 to 2010-11, the area under<br />

both food and non-food crops decreased, and from 2010-11 to 2019-20 the area under food<br />

crops continued to decrease, and the area under non-food crops remained stagnant (Fig). The<br />

agricultural land in the state has been converted for non-agricultural purposes like residential<br />

plots, real estate assets and mining and quarrying. There is a massive leap in the land put to<br />

non-agricultural purposes in the state. The land put to non-agricultural purposes, which stood<br />

at 275000 ha. in 1970-71 increased to 455897 ha in 2019-20. (GoK, 2022). Another important<br />

land<br />

2000000<br />

1500000<br />

1000000<br />

500000<br />

0<br />

1970-71 1980-81 1990-91 2000-01 2010-11 2019-20<br />

Food crops<br />

Non food crops<br />

Fig: Area under food crops and non-food crops -Kerala<br />

transition in the state is land fallowing. The land under current fallow, and fallow other than<br />

current fallow in 1970-71 has increased from 24000 ha and 22000 ha to 57387 ha and 46931<br />

ha, respectively in 2019-20 (GoK, 2022). Agricultural land-use decisions are mostly influenced<br />

by social and ecological determinants. The major social determinants <strong>of</strong> farmland transitions<br />

in Kerala are the conducive political power system favouring land reforms, dynamics <strong>of</strong><br />

Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts<br />

854 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

production and market, changes in family structure, wage structure and labour policies,<br />

migration, food security assurance programmes and urbanization.<br />

The implementation <strong>of</strong> land reform acts led to extreme land fragmentation, which impacted the<br />

scale <strong>of</strong> production turning agriculture into a low-pr<strong>of</strong>it venture. This also resulted in an<br />

alienation from farming, a shift to less labour-intensive crops and increased agricultural land<br />

fallowing (Kumar and Harilal, 2014). The wage rate in Kerala is higher than the average<br />

national wage rate. This has resulted in higher rates <strong>of</strong> land conversion, especially among<br />

marginal farmers, from labour-intensive crops like paddy to less labour-intensive crops.<br />

Change in family structure from joint to nuclear family resulted in the redistribution <strong>of</strong><br />

property, which led to the fragmentation <strong>of</strong> the land holdings and reduced family labour supply.<br />

Migration has resulted in absentee landlordism, and land has become a speculative asset.<br />

Migration from other states to Kerala could not contribute much to the agriculture sector. There<br />

are 31.5 lakhs migrant labourers in the state, out <strong>of</strong> which only 2.9 lakhs are employed in<br />

agriculture (Parida and Raman, 2021). The strong network <strong>of</strong> assured food supply through the<br />

public distribution system made food crops a less priority sector in agriculture. Urbanization<br />

in Kerala has also led to increased land value, agricultural land conversions and an increased<br />

number <strong>of</strong> built-ups.<br />

The primary ecological determinants <strong>of</strong> farmland transition in Kerala are climate change,<br />

edaphic factors, invasive weeds and pests. Non-uniform rainfall patterns, extreme dry spells,<br />

floods and landslides limit farming activities. However, concerted efforts have been made to<br />

combat the receding agricultural land in the state. The major programmes and policies in<br />

response to changing land use in the state include the Kerala conservation <strong>of</strong> paddy land and<br />

wetland act (2008), agro ecological zone-based planning and development (2012), Haritha<br />

Keralam Mission (2016), Subhiksha Keralam (2021) and Njangalum krishiyilekk (2022).<br />

Conclusion<br />

Significant changes in agriculture land use in Kerala are conversion <strong>of</strong> food crops to cash crops<br />

area, conversion to non-agricultural purposes, and increased land fallow. Social and ecological<br />

determinants influence land use decisions. It could be concluded that agriculture needs to be<br />

considered as a socio-ecological system wherein a balance between social and environmental<br />

determinants is required to attain long-term sustainability.<br />

References<br />

GoK [Government <strong>of</strong> Kerala]. 2022. Economic Review 2021. Kerala State Planning Board,<br />

Government <strong>of</strong> Kerala, Thiruvananthapuram, 65pp.<br />

Kumar, E G., and Harilal, C.C., 2014. Land reforms and agrarian relations in the state <strong>of</strong> Kerala,<br />

India - a socio-economic evaluation. Ind. J. Ecol. 41, (2): 344-348.<br />

855 | Page Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Parida, J.K., and Raman, K. R., 2021. A study on In-Migration, Informal Employment and<br />

Urbanization in Kerala. Kerala State Planning Board, Government <strong>of</strong> Kerala,<br />

Thiruvananthapuram, 101pp.<br />

Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts<br />

T6-25P-1204<br />

Socio-Economic Pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> Farmers <strong>of</strong> North Alluvial Plane <strong>of</strong> Bihar<br />

Amrendra Kumar * , Anjani Kumar, Sudeepa Kumari Jha, Rabindra Kumar,<br />

Sumit Kumar Singh and Priyanka Kumari<br />

ICAR-Agricultural Technology Application Research Institute, Patna-14<br />

*amrendra14d@gmail.com<br />

The economic condition <strong>of</strong> farmers in Bihar is totally dependent on cultivation <strong>of</strong> field crops<br />

and allied activities. Most <strong>of</strong> the population is engaged in farming completely linked to the<br />

agriculture and its associated activities only few engaged in other activities (MGNREGA, small<br />

vender etc.). (Vijoy, 2014). Cropping system <strong>of</strong> north Bihar is pre-dominated by cereal crop<br />

(rice-wheat) but slight change was noticed in cropping pattern during last four decade.<br />

Production and productivity <strong>of</strong> all the principal crops were increased but performance <strong>of</strong> rice<br />

which is staple food crop <strong>of</strong> the region, has been impressive in irrigated field but in rainfed and<br />

water-logged situation condition are still alarming. Maize cultivation and its productivity<br />

increased due to adoption <strong>of</strong> Rabi maize and hybrid variety introduction in large scale.<br />

However, pulses and oilseeds production witnessed a setback due to decline in area and almost<br />

stagnant productivity (Kumar et al., 2017). The major constrain for crop grower farmers are<br />

small and fragmented land holding, non- availability <strong>of</strong> seed/planting material, high cost <strong>of</strong><br />

input, high incidence <strong>of</strong> pest and diseases and less mechanization. In case <strong>of</strong> livestock<br />

production: infertility, lack <strong>of</strong> proper dairy management practices, non-availability <strong>of</strong> improved<br />

breed, lack <strong>of</strong> balancing food are the major one (Bhutia et al., 2017).<br />

Methodology<br />

A survey programme organized under New Extension Methodology and Approaches (NEMA)<br />

program to study the socio-economic pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> farmers <strong>of</strong> zone I (north alluvial plane) in the<br />

year 2019. KVKs <strong>of</strong> three districts viz; West Champaran, Sheohar and Begusarai which are<br />

located in north, central and south portion <strong>of</strong> the zone were selected. Total 645 respondent were<br />

participated from which 121, 136 and 418 were from Sheohar, Begusarai and West Champaran,<br />

respectively.<br />

Results<br />

On the basis <strong>of</strong> data collected as seen in table, it was found that in most <strong>of</strong> the family head<br />

involve in agriculture was male member (80.93 %) and female as head was only (19.07 %).<br />

Based on land holding classification out <strong>of</strong> 645 farmers, 188 farmers belong to marginal class,<br />

856 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

163 in small. Education is one <strong>of</strong> the important socio-economic factors which is related to<br />

understanding and technology adoption. It was found that 51.78 % farmers had formal<br />

schooling maximum upto 10 th standard only. Most <strong>of</strong> the participant under the study belongs<br />

to either middle (35.35 %) or old (37.36 %) age group. About 50 per cent <strong>of</strong> respondent resides<br />

in those area which is 5 to 10 km away from market. 37.36 per cent people harness the benefit<br />

<strong>of</strong> market in vicinity <strong>of</strong> 5 km and 12.72 per cent farmers could not take the benefit <strong>of</strong> market<br />

as it was quite away. Thus, people who resides in nearby market avail area gets more benefits.<br />

61.86 % participant lives in radius <strong>of</strong> 10 km <strong>of</strong> extension service provider. Majority <strong>of</strong> the<br />

farmers (77.36 %) had less than one lakh annual income and only few have (7.60 %) had more<br />

than 1.5 lakh.<br />

Socio-economic pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> farmers<br />

Trait Category No. Per cent Cumulative (%)<br />

Categories <strong>of</strong><br />

Farmer<br />

Education<br />

Age Group<br />

Distance <strong>of</strong><br />

Market<br />

Distance From<br />

Nearest Extension<br />

Service Provider<br />

Male 522 80.93<br />

Female 123 19.07<br />

Marginal (< 1 ha) 188 29.15 29.15<br />

Small (1-2 ha) 163 25.27 54.42<br />

Semi-Medium (2-<br />

4 ha)<br />

145<br />

22.48<br />

76.90<br />

Medium (4-10 ha) 118 18.29 95.19<br />

Large (>10 ha) 31 4.81 100.00<br />

Illiterate 54 8.37 8.37<br />

No Formal<br />

Schooling<br />

115<br />

17.83<br />

26.20<br />

Formal 334 51.78 77.98<br />

Matric 96 14.89 92.87<br />

Graduate 46 7.13 100.00<br />

Young (< 35<br />

year)<br />

Middle (35-45<br />

year)<br />

176<br />

228<br />

27.29<br />

35.35<br />

27.29<br />

62.64<br />

Old (> 45 year) 241 37.36 100.00<br />

Upto 5 Km 241 37.36 37.36<br />

5-10 Km 322 49.92 87.28<br />

10-15 Km 51 7.91 95.19<br />

15 -20 Km 31 4.81 100.00<br />

Upto 10 Km 399 61.86 61.86<br />

10-20 Km 214 33.18 95.04<br />

20-30 Km 26 4.03 99.07<br />

More Than 30<br />

Km<br />

6<br />

0.93<br />

100.00<br />

857 | Page Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Plant Protection 314 48.68<br />

Equipment<br />

Annual Income<br />

per family (Rs.)<br />

Irrigation 241 37.36<br />

Drip 5 0.78<br />

Sprinkle 1 0.16<br />

Tillage 108 16.74<br />

Tractor 77 11.94<br />

Harvesting 17 2.64<br />

Upto 50000 102 15.81 15.81<br />

50000 -1 Lakh 397 61.55 77.36<br />

1.0 -1.5 Lakh 97 15.04 92.40<br />

≥ 1.5 Lakh 49 7.60 100.00<br />

Conclusion<br />

From the survey it was concluded that small and fragmented land, less education and<br />

dominance <strong>of</strong> male in agriculture system are the major constrain. In spite <strong>of</strong> the many<br />

governments scheme running the socio-economic condition <strong>of</strong> the farmers not raised to an<br />

expected level among the study group.<br />

References<br />

Bhutia, T. L., Kumari, K. R., Snatashree, M. and Kumar, U. 2017. Constrain analysis in the<br />

crop-livestock farming system <strong>of</strong> small and marginal farmers <strong>of</strong> Bihar. SKUAST<br />

J. Res. 19(1): 92-96.<br />

Kumar, A., Singh, R. K. P., Bharati, R. C., Chandra, N. and Kumar, U. 2017. Growth<br />

Performance <strong>of</strong> Principal Crops in North Bihar during last four decades: Empirical<br />

Evidences. J. AgriSearch. 4 (2): 154-159.<br />

Vijoy, P. 2014. Agricultural development and out migration in Bihar. Int. j. economics<br />

commerce manag. 4(5): 30-33.<br />

Organisational Dynamics <strong>of</strong> FPCS for Good Management<br />

Akhil Ajith and Binoo P. Bonny<br />

College <strong>of</strong> Agriculture (KAU), Vellanikkara 680656, Kerala, India<br />

T6-26P-1209<br />

The rise <strong>of</strong> Farmer Producer Companies (FPCs) has enabled farmers to increase productivity<br />

through efficient, cost-effective and sustainable resource use and to realize higher returns for<br />

the produce. Understanding the growing relevance, the GOI to promote FPCs allocated a<br />

budget <strong>of</strong> 200 crore rupees in 2014 under the Producer Organization Development and<br />

Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts<br />

858 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Upliftment Corpus (PRODUCE) Fund through NABARD. As a result <strong>of</strong> such national<br />

initiatives, 7374 FPCs have been registered till March 2019 (Neti et al., 2019). Though the first<br />

FPC in Kerala, IOFPCL was registered in 2004, the idea gained momentum in the state only<br />

2013 onwards. The growth trend, which could be attributed to the support <strong>of</strong> NABARD grants<br />

indicated maximum registration in the year 2016. But the registrations reduced to zero in the<br />

terminal year <strong>of</strong> the NABARD project, 2018. However, a consistent increase in FPC<br />

registrations from 2019 could be noted and with the advent <strong>of</strong> new policy regime announced<br />

in Union budget which is expected to grow further (GOI, 2019).<br />

Even though there was a steady increase the FPCs, which acts as an effective linkage between<br />

farm production and the market, FPCs face many constraints in its formation, functioning, and<br />

service delivery. This is evident from the reports that many registered producer companies<br />

could not continue their operations due to technological, marketing, and policy constraints<br />

(Thamban et al., 2020). In this context it is important to understand the interrelations and<br />

influence <strong>of</strong> organisational attributes such as turnover, membership, age <strong>of</strong> FPC, infrastructure,<br />

and machinery which are represented by nominal categorical data sets.<br />

Methodology<br />

A total <strong>of</strong> 30 FPOs that were in operation for at least two years from the date <strong>of</strong> registration<br />

were selected randomly from all the 14 districts <strong>of</strong> Kerala. The number <strong>of</strong> FPCs selected from<br />

a district was decided proportionate to the number <strong>of</strong> FPCs registered in the district. A<br />

quantitative survey design was employed in data collection. A pretested structured interview<br />

schedule prepared based on expert discussions and literature review was used in the research.<br />

Due to the Covid-19 pandemic and enforcement <strong>of</strong> COVID protocols and restrictions, prefixed<br />

telephonic interviews and video calls were also used for data collection in unavoidable<br />

circumstances. Multi Coordinate Analysis was used in the study as a statistical visualisation<br />

tool for visualising the relationship between organisational attributed represented by categorical<br />

variable levels. This method could evaluate two-way and multi-way data. The visualisation <strong>of</strong><br />

the associations was done using the biplots obtained as result <strong>of</strong> plotting the first two<br />

components contributing the maximum variance.<br />

Categories <strong>of</strong> variables evaluated using MCA<br />

Variable Category 1 Category 2<br />

Age <strong>of</strong> FPC Mature Nascent<br />

Turnover High Low<br />

Membership High Low<br />

Machinery More Less<br />

Infrastructure Good Poor<br />

Performance Good Poor<br />

859 | Page Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Results<br />

The influence <strong>of</strong> categorical variables <strong>of</strong> FPCs on performance was revealed through the MCA<br />

analysis. The results from the column plot indicated that poor and good performances were<br />

most distant from the origin along the horizontal axis for component 1. This corresponded well<br />

with the relatively high contribution for these categories for component 1. Also, low turnover<br />

and high turnover, low machinery, as well as more machinery, were on opposite sides <strong>of</strong> the<br />

origin which indicated that the component 1 contrasted on these category values. Component<br />

2 is represented on the vertical axis. The matured category was located far from the other<br />

categories on one side <strong>of</strong> the vertical axis. Therefore, on component 2 matured FPCs contrasted<br />

with other categories.<br />

Conclusion<br />

The association between the selected categorical pairs <strong>of</strong> variables with categories <strong>of</strong><br />

performance and age <strong>of</strong> the FPC was noted. The study revealed that nascent FPCs performed<br />

better with more machinery, good infrastructure and higher turnovers. Hence for nascent FPCs,<br />

streamlining the activities with envisaging the improvement the machinery and infrastructure<br />

and turnover is recommended rather than membership enhancement. On contrary in order to<br />

improve the performance <strong>of</strong> the matured FPCs membership enhancement was key.<br />

References<br />

Bi- plot <strong>of</strong> categorical attributes<br />

GOI [Government <strong>of</strong> India]. 2019. Strategy Paper for promotion <strong>of</strong> 10,000 Farmer Producer<br />

Organisations (FPOs). New Delhi: Small Farmers' Agribusiness Consortium (SFAC), p.34.<br />

Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts<br />

860 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Neti, A., Govil, R., and Rao, M. R. 2019. Farmer producer companies in India: Demystifying the<br />

numbers. Rev. Agrarian Stud. 9(2369-2020-1967).<br />

Thamban, C., Jayasekhar, S., Chandran, K. P. and Rajesh, M. K., 2020. Sustainability <strong>of</strong> Farmer<br />

Producer Organisations-The case <strong>of</strong> producer organisations involved in the production and<br />

marketing <strong>of</strong> ‘neera’in the coconut sector in Kerala, India. J. Plant. Crops. 48(2):150-159.<br />

T6-27P-1236<br />

Identification <strong>of</strong> Suitable Varieties and Dates <strong>of</strong> Sowing in Cowpea for<br />

Prakasam District<br />

S. Bharathi, L. Rajesh Chowdary and G. Subba Rao<br />

Agricultural Research Station Darsi, Prakasam, Andhra Pradesh<br />

ars.darsi@angrau.ac.in<br />

Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.) is one <strong>of</strong> the versatile leguminous vegetable having much more<br />

protein than other vegetables and it thrives well in warm weather due to its drought-tolerant<br />

capacity. Cowpea is adaptable to hostile environments due to its morphological as well as<br />

biochemical qualities. This crop does not require a high rate <strong>of</strong> nitrogen fertilization as its roots<br />

have nodules contain bacteria called Rhizobiaum helps to fix nitrogen from the air (Shiringani<br />

and Shimeles, 2011). In India, despite the fact that a large number <strong>of</strong> varieties/hybrids and agrotechniques<br />

have been developed, but the productivity <strong>of</strong> cowpea has still not reached the<br />

desired level. Varietal differences <strong>of</strong> cowpea in terms <strong>of</strong> growth pattern and duration for seed<br />

maturity are extremely diverse from plant to plant, making breeding programs for cowpea more<br />

complex than other crops. There are diverse cowpea genotypes demanding a site specific<br />

directed management approach and choice <strong>of</strong> proper sowing window and selection <strong>of</strong> best<br />

adapted genotype. Suitable time <strong>of</strong> sowing provides optimum growing conditions with<br />

favourable temperature, light, humidity and rainfall during the growth phase <strong>of</strong> the crop. This<br />

ultimately decides the selection <strong>of</strong> varieties for particular or different dates <strong>of</strong> sowing to<br />

stabilize or to get higher yields.<br />

Methodology<br />

The field trial was conducted for two years during Rabi, 2018-19 and 2019-20 under rainfed<br />

conditions at Agricultural Research Station, Darsi. The experiment was planned with three<br />

cowpea varieties viz., TPT-1, Local brown and Local bold white (Meghana) and four dates <strong>of</strong><br />

sowing viz., D 1- 2 nd fortnight <strong>of</strong> September, D 2- 1 st fortnight <strong>of</strong> October, D 3- 2 nd fortnight <strong>of</strong><br />

October and D4- 1 st fortnight <strong>of</strong> November. The experiment was laid out in split plot design<br />

with three replications. The main plots were four dates <strong>of</strong> sowing and sub plots were three<br />

varieties. The observations on plant height, number <strong>of</strong> branches, number <strong>of</strong> pods per plant, seed<br />

yield were recorded.<br />

861 | Page Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Results<br />

The dates <strong>of</strong> sowing showed significant effect on growth and yield <strong>of</strong> the cowpea varieties<br />

tested. There was gradual decrease in the plant height with the progress <strong>of</strong> sowing dates tested.<br />

Maximum plant height <strong>of</strong> 94.45 cm was recorded in crop sown during 2 nd fortnight <strong>of</strong><br />

September followed by 1 st fortnight <strong>of</strong> October (64.70 cm). Lowest plant height <strong>of</strong> 39.25 cm<br />

was recorded in the November 1 st fortnight sown crop. In present investigation September<br />

second fortnight sown crop produced significantly maximum seed yield (1367 kg ha -1 ) and was<br />

on par with sowing <strong>of</strong> October first fortnight (1285 kg/ha) and was significantly superior to the<br />

other two dates <strong>of</strong> sowing tested. The three varieties tested recorded similar plant height and<br />

number <strong>of</strong> branches per plant. Tirupati-1 recorded highest seed yield <strong>of</strong> 1323 kg/ha and was<br />

significantly superior over Local brown (1159 kg/ha) and Local bold white (Meghana) 906<br />

kg/ha. The higher seed yield obtained in early sown crop might be due to higher available soil<br />

moisture during cropping period as a result <strong>of</strong> receipt <strong>of</strong> well distributed rainfall (Rima<br />

Taipodia and Nabam, 2013). Similarly, Prabhamani and Potdar (2018) also recorded higher<br />

seed yield, haulm yield and B:C ratio in cowpea sown at early dates during Rabi. Interactions<br />

were non-significant.<br />

Yield attributes and seed yield <strong>of</strong> cowpea as influenced by different dates <strong>of</strong> sowing and varieties<br />

Dates <strong>of</strong> sowing<br />

2 nd fortnight <strong>of</strong><br />

September<br />

1 st fortnight <strong>of</strong><br />

October<br />

2 nd fortnight <strong>of</strong><br />

October<br />

1 st fortnight <strong>of</strong><br />

November<br />

Plant height<br />

(cm)<br />

No <strong>of</strong><br />

branches/plant<br />

No. <strong>of</strong><br />

pods/plant<br />

Seed yield<br />

(kg/ha)<br />

94.45 9.10 15.85 1367<br />

64.70 7.55 15.05 1285<br />

48.30 6.35 13.40 1069<br />

39.25 5.55 10.55 817.5<br />

S.Em ± 2.20 0.40 0.75 56<br />

CD (0.05) 7.55 1.40 2.65 194<br />

Varieties<br />

CV (%) 9.05 11.91 11.65 10.97<br />

Tirupati-1 63.55 7.44 14.85 1323<br />

Local brown 61.70 7.25 14.10 1159<br />

Local bold<br />

white<br />

(Meghana)<br />

59.72 6.81 12.20 906<br />

S.Em ± 2.25 0.44 0.365 59.8<br />

CD (0.05) NS NS 1.09 179.05<br />

CV (%) 8.6 15 6.6 13.2<br />

Interaction NS NS NS NS<br />

Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts<br />

862 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

References<br />

Prabhamani, P. S. and Potdar, M. P. 2018. Response <strong>of</strong> Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.)<br />

Genotypes to Sowing Windows and Planting Geometry under Northern Transitional<br />

Zone <strong>of</strong> Karnataka. Int. J. Pure App. Biosci. 6(1):820-827.<br />

Rima Taipodia and Nabam, A.T. 2013. Impact <strong>of</strong> time <strong>of</strong> sowing spacing and seed rate on<br />

potential seed production and fodder quality <strong>of</strong> cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp). J.<br />

Agril. Veter. Sci. 4(4): 61-68.<br />

Shiringani, R. P. and Shimeles, H. A. 2011. Yield response and stability among cowpea<br />

genotypes at three planting dates and test environments. Afr. J. Agric. Res. 6 (4): 3259-<br />

3263.<br />

T6-28P-1246<br />

Influence <strong>of</strong> Foliar Application <strong>of</strong> Potassium Nitrate on Yield and<br />

Economics <strong>of</strong> Soybean under Rainfed Conditions <strong>of</strong> Vidarbha<br />

M. M. Ganvir*, A. S. Dhudse, V. V. Gabhane, A.P. Karunakar, P. N. Chirde,<br />

A. R.Tupe, R.S. Patode and A. B. Chorey<br />

All India Coordinated Research Project for Dryland Agriculture,<br />

Dr. Panjabrao Deshmukh Krishi Vidyapeeth, Akola, Maharashtra-444104<br />

*ganvir08@gmail.com<br />

Soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.) is one <strong>of</strong> the key industrial grain legume crops throughout the<br />

world. It is known for its high productivity, pr<strong>of</strong>itability and diverse industrial uses (Das et. al.<br />

2016). In India, the area under soybean cultivation during 2021-22 was 119.98 lakh ha with<br />

production <strong>of</strong> 118.88 lakh MT and productivity <strong>of</strong> 991 kg ha -1 . In Maharashtra the area under<br />

soybean was 46.17 lakh ha with production <strong>of</strong> 54.21 lakh MT and productivity <strong>of</strong> 1174.27 kg<br />

ha -1 . In Vidarbha, the area under cultivation was 17.65 lakh ha with production <strong>of</strong> 22.79 lakh<br />

MT and productivity <strong>of</strong> 1291.5 kg ha -1 (Anonymous, 2022).<br />

In recent years soybean has become a predominant rainy season crop under rainfed<br />

agroecosystem in Vidarbha region. However, the average productivity <strong>of</strong> crop continues to be<br />

very low as compared to world average. Occurrence <strong>of</strong> dry spell at critical growth stages <strong>of</strong><br />

crop is one <strong>of</strong> the major factors responsible for low productivity <strong>of</strong> soybean in Vidarbha region.<br />

In drought stress, there is a reduction in nutrient uptake by the roots partially due to the<br />

reduction in soil moisture. Under such condition, foliar application is a viable option and hence<br />

the present investigation was conducted with an objective to study the effect <strong>of</strong> foliar<br />

application <strong>of</strong> potassium nitrate on yield and economics <strong>of</strong> soybean under rainfed conditions.<br />

863 | Page Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Methodology<br />

The experiment was conducted during kharif season <strong>of</strong> 2017-18 at Farm <strong>of</strong> University<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Agronomy, Dr. Panjabrao Deshmukh Krishi Vidyapeeth, Akola (Maharashtra).<br />

The soil <strong>of</strong> experimental plot was clayey in texture and slightly alkaline in reaction. As regards<br />

to fertility status, the soil was medium in available nitrogen, low in available phosphorus, fairly<br />

high in available potassium and moderate in organic carbon. The experiment was laid out in a<br />

randomized block design with three replications. The eight treatments comprised <strong>of</strong> T1- Control<br />

(No Spray), T 2-Water spray at 25-30 DAS and 60-65 DAS, T 3 - 1% KNO 3 at 25-30 DAS, T 4-<br />

2% KNO3 at 25-30 DAS, T5- 1% KNO3 at 60-65 DAS, T6- 2% KNO3 at 60-65 DAS, T7-1%<br />

KNO3 at 25-30 DAS and 60-65 DAS and T8- 2% KNO3 at 25-30 DAS and 60-65 DAS.<br />

Results<br />

Data on productivity and economics <strong>of</strong> soybean as influenced by different treatments is<br />

presented in the Table. Significantly higher grain and straw yield (2135 and 2677 kg ha -1 ,<br />

respectively) was recorded with application 1% KNO 3 at 25-30 DAS and 60-65 DAS (T 7) and<br />

found at par with application <strong>of</strong> 2 % KNO3 at 25-30 DAS and 60-65 DAS (T8) which recorded<br />

grain and straw yield <strong>of</strong> 2055 and 2610 kg ha -1 , respectively. The lowest grain yield <strong>of</strong> 1590<br />

kg ha -1 and straw yield <strong>of</strong> 2103 kg ha -1 was observed in T1 (control). The application <strong>of</strong><br />

potassium nitrate supplied N and K which are absorbed as anion and cation by plants and might<br />

have delayed the synthesis <strong>of</strong> abscisic acid and promoted cytokinin activity causing higher<br />

chlorophyll retention which in turn promoted more leaf area.<br />

Productivity and Economics <strong>of</strong> soybean as influenced by different treatments<br />

Treatment<br />

Yield (kg ha -1 )<br />

Seed<br />

Straw<br />

Gross<br />

Monetary<br />

Returns<br />

(Rs. ha -1 )<br />

Net<br />

Monetary<br />

Returns<br />

(kg ha -1 )<br />

B:C ratio<br />

T 1 - Control (No Spray) 1590 2103 59856 31783 2.13<br />

T 2 - Water Spray at 25-30 DAS and 60-<br />

65 DAS<br />

1651 2140 62065 33072 2.14<br />

T 3 - 1% KNO 3 at 25-30 DAS 1852 2391 69602 39712 2.33<br />

T 4 - 2% KNO 3 at 25-30 DAS 1820 2356 68412 37625 2.22<br />

T 5 - 1% KNO 3 at 60-65 DAS 1905 2445 71565 41545 2.38<br />

T 6 - 2% KNO 3 at 60-65 DAS 1880 2422 70644 39727 2.28<br />

T 7 - 1% KNO 3 at 25-30 DAS and 60-65<br />

DAS<br />

T 8 - 2% KNO 3 at 25-30 DAS and 60-65<br />

DAS<br />

2135 2677 80079 48242 2.52<br />

2055 2610 77145 43514 2.29<br />

SE (m)± 47 71 1845 1845 0.06<br />

CD at 5% 145 213 5536 5536 0.19<br />

Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts<br />

864 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

This may secure higher photosynthetic activity in effective leaves and supplied to developing<br />

pods with current photosynthates for proper filling, resulting in higher yield. Vekaria et al.<br />

(2013) and Kumar et al. (2017) also found similar results.<br />

The foliar application <strong>of</strong> 1% KNO3 at 25-30 DAS and 60-65 DAS (T7) recorded significantly<br />

maximum gross monetary returns (Rs. 80079 ha -1 ) and net monetary returns (Rs. 48242 ha -1 )<br />

and was at par with application <strong>of</strong> 2% KNO 3 at 25-30 DAS and 60-65 DAS (T 8) which recorded<br />

gross monetary returns <strong>of</strong> Rs.77115 ha -1 and net monetary returns <strong>of</strong> Rs.43514 ha -1 . The<br />

minimum gross monetary return (Rs.59856 ha -1 ) and net monetary returns (Rs. 31783 ha -1 ) was<br />

observed in T1 (control). This might be due to improvement in growth and yield attributes and<br />

ultimate increase in seed yield which could be the reason for enhanced economic returns in the<br />

above treatments. Maximum B:C ratio <strong>of</strong> 2.52 was recorded with application <strong>of</strong> 1% KNO 3 at<br />

25-30 and 60-65 DAS (T7) followed by treatment <strong>of</strong> 1 % KNO3 at 60-65 DAS (T5). The lowest<br />

B:C ratio <strong>of</strong> 2.13 was observed in T 1 (control). Similar observation was recorded by Kumar<br />

and Srivastava (2015).<br />

Conclusion<br />

Foliar application <strong>of</strong> 1% KNO 3 at 25-30 and 60-65 DAS on soybean was beneficial for getting<br />

the higher productivity, maximum monetary returns and higher B:C ratio.<br />

References<br />

Anonymous 2022. State and District wise statistics <strong>of</strong> crops acreage, production and<br />

productivity in Maharashtra state. (www.mahaagri.gov.in).<br />

Das A, Babu S, Yadav GS, Ansari MA, Singh R, Baishya LK, Rajkhowa DJ and Ngachan SV.<br />

2016. Status and strategies for pulses production for food and nutritional security in<br />

North-Eastern Region <strong>of</strong> India. Indian J. Agron., 61: 43–47.<br />

Kumar M, Suryavanshi VP and Dambal AS. 2017. Growth and yield <strong>of</strong> soybean [Glycine max<br />

(L.) Merrill] as influenced by foliar application <strong>of</strong> micronutrients and potassium nitrate.<br />

Agric. Update, 12(TECHSEAR-1):247-250.<br />

Kumar J. and Srivastava SK. 2015. Growth and yield attributes, yield, fibre quality and<br />

economics <strong>of</strong> hirsutum cotton as influenced by foliar application <strong>of</strong> KNO 3. Plant Arch.,<br />

15(2):1147-1149.<br />

Vekaria GB, Talpada MM, Sutaria GS. and Akbari KN. 2013. Effect <strong>of</strong> foliar nutrition<br />

potassium nitrate on growth and yield on green gram. Legume Res. 36 (2):162-165.<br />

865 | Page Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

T6-29P-1254<br />

Impact <strong>of</strong> Cluster Front Line Demonstrations on Productivity and<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>itability <strong>of</strong> Mung bean (Vigna radiata L.) var. IPM-02-3 and MH-421 in<br />

Churu district <strong>of</strong> Rajasthan<br />

Hrish Kumar Rachhoya, V.K.Saini and Ramesh Choudhary<br />

Krishi Vigyan Kendra, (GVM), Sardarshahar-331403, District-Churu (Rajasthan), India<br />

kvkchuru@gmail.com<br />

Churu comes under desert region <strong>of</strong> Rajasthan and agriculturally it is very important district.<br />

In Churu Mung bean cultivation is common practice but its productivity is very low. To<br />

establish the production potential <strong>of</strong> this pulse Cluster Front Line Demonstration (CFLD) is an<br />

appropriate tool. To increase the production and productivity <strong>of</strong> Mung bean in the district,<br />

Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Gandhi Vidya Mandir, Sardarshahar, Churu (Rajasthan) conducted 275<br />

demonstrations (110 ha) on Mung bean during 2016 to 2021 in eight adopted villages. The<br />

critical inputs were identified after gap analysis in existing production technology through<br />

meeting and group discussions with the farmers. Average yield data <strong>of</strong> conducted CFLDs<br />

revealed that, higher yield (657 kg ha -1 ) was obtained in demonstration plot over local check<br />

(483 kg ha- 1 ) and an additional yield in demonstration plot was obtained 174 kg. Per cent<br />

increase over local check was found 35.87. Average extension gap, technology gap and<br />

technology index were found 174 kg ha- 1 , 343 kg ha -1 and 34.31 % , respectively. Average <strong>of</strong><br />

gross and net returns <strong>of</strong> demonstration was Rs. 39003 and Rs. 24154 higher than the farmers’<br />

practice. Most important factor B: C ratio indicates that whether CFLD technology is<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>itable, B:C ratio was found higher throughout the study and average was (2.58:1) in<br />

demonstration over local check (1.94:1). Review <strong>of</strong> data on incidence <strong>of</strong> disease in crop<br />

revealed that, percentage <strong>of</strong> damaged plant (9.83) was lower in demonstration as compared to<br />

(17.10) under farmers’ practice. Spraying <strong>of</strong> Dimethoate 30 EC @ 1200 ml/ha at flower and<br />

pod formation stage reduces sucking pest attack, consequently lesser infected pods (2.37) in<br />

demo as compared to farmers practices (12.9). Result suggested economic viability and<br />

agronomic feasibility <strong>of</strong> the CFLD technology for Mung bean cultivation.<br />

Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts<br />

866 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

T6-30P-1269<br />

Effect <strong>of</strong> Time <strong>of</strong> Application and Different Foliar Sprays on Yield and<br />

Economics <strong>of</strong> Cotton<br />

A.B. Chorey*, R. S Mali, M. M. Ganvir, V.V. Gabhane, R. S. Patode and<br />

G. Ravindrachary<br />

AICRP for Dryland Agriculture, Dr. PDKV, Akola, Maharashtra-444104<br />

*chiefscientist1057@gmail.com<br />

Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.), popularly known as ‘White Gold’ is grown mainly for fiber<br />

all over the world. It is the major fiber crop <strong>of</strong> the semi-arid tropics <strong>of</strong> Indian subcontinent that<br />

is predominantly rain dependent. In India, it is grown in an area <strong>of</strong> 13.5 million hectares with<br />

a production <strong>of</strong> 36.5 million bales and productivity <strong>of</strong> 460 kg ha − 1 (COCPC, 2020).<br />

Drought occurring is frequent in rainfed regions <strong>of</strong> Vidarbha in Maharashtra State. Under<br />

drought stress, there is a reduction in nutrient uptake by the roots partially due to the reduction<br />

in soil moisture and also crop growth is suffered when the roots are unable to meet the nutrient<br />

requirement <strong>of</strong> the crop at a critical stage. Hence, under such situation foliar nutrition can be<br />

beneficial. The foliar application <strong>of</strong> Zn increases auxin levels within the plants which in turn<br />

enhances the root growth and consequent improvement <strong>of</strong> drought tolerance in plants. Hence<br />

the investigation was conducted to study the effect <strong>of</strong> foliar nutrition on growth and yield <strong>of</strong><br />

cotton to mitigate the ill effects <strong>of</strong> drought situation with different set <strong>of</strong> treatments in situations<br />

<strong>of</strong> stress and after relieving <strong>of</strong> stress.<br />

Methodology<br />

The field experiment was conducted at research field <strong>of</strong> AICRP for Dryland Agriculture, Dr.<br />

PDKV, Akola (MS) during 2021-2022. Effect <strong>of</strong> time <strong>of</strong> application and different foliar sprays<br />

on yield and economics <strong>of</strong> cotton was studied and analyzed. The experiment was laid out in<br />

factorial randomized block design with three replications. For this study two factors were<br />

considered, in factor A: Time <strong>of</strong> application with treatments T 1:Foliar spray during dry spell<br />

and T2 : Foliar spray after reliving <strong>of</strong> stress/dry spell and for factor B different foliar sprays<br />

are used, S 1 : application <strong>of</strong> urea, @1% , S 2:application <strong>of</strong> urea @2%, S 3: application <strong>of</strong> water<br />

soluble complex fertilizer 19:19:19@0.5%, S 4:application <strong>of</strong> water soluble complex fertilizer<br />

19:19:19@ 0.5% + Zinc sulphate @0.5% , S5 :application <strong>of</strong> Zinc sulphate @0.5%, S6:Water<br />

spray, S 7:application <strong>of</strong> KNO 3@1.5% and S 8:Control (No spray).<br />

867 | Page Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Cotton productivity, economics and RWUE as influence by various treatments<br />

Treatments<br />

Time <strong>of</strong> Application<br />

Seed cotton yield<br />

(kg ha -1 )<br />

Cotton stalk yield<br />

(kg ha -1 )<br />

B:C Ratio<br />

RWUE<br />

(kg ha -1 mm -1 )<br />

T 1 1150 2014 1.82 1.57<br />

T2 1017 1781 1.65 1.39<br />

S.Em. +- 6.30 11.06 - 0.01<br />

C.D. at 5% 18.20 31.92 - 0.02<br />

Sprays<br />

S1 1041 1824 1.69 1.42<br />

S 2 1052 1845 1.70 1.44<br />

S3 1253 2193 1.95 1.71<br />

S4 1262 2208 1.92 1.73<br />

S 5 975 1706 1.58 1.33<br />

S6 888 1553 1.49 1.21<br />

S7 1251 2189 1.96 1.71<br />

S 8 949 1660 1.59 1.30<br />

S.Em.+- 9.45 16.58 - 0.01<br />

C.D. at 5 % 27.29 47.89 - 0.04<br />

Interaction Effects<br />

S.Em.± 50.41 88.44 - 0.07<br />

C.D. at 5% NS NS - NS<br />

Mean 1084 1897 1.74 1.48<br />

Results<br />

The results indicated that, treatment <strong>of</strong> foliar spray during dry spell recorded significantly higher<br />

seed cotton yield, cotton stalk yield, B:C ratio and high rainwater use efficiency than treatment <strong>of</strong><br />

foliar spray after relieving <strong>of</strong> stress. Drought disturbs the mineral-nutrient relations in plants<br />

through their effects on nutrient availability and partitioning <strong>of</strong> transport processes in plants.<br />

Frequent soil drying is likely to induce a decrease in nutrients particularly P due to reduced<br />

diffusion and poor uptake, in addition to restrictions in available water, with strong interactive<br />

effects on plant growth and functioning (Singh et al., 2006). Treatment <strong>of</strong> foliar spray <strong>of</strong> 19:19:19<br />

mix water soluble fertilizer + ZnSO 4 @ 0.5% recorded significantly higher seed cotton yield,<br />

cotton stalk yield, B:C ratio and high rainwater use efficiency than rest <strong>of</strong> the treatments. Cotton<br />

productivity was increased due to application <strong>of</strong> different foliar spray (Asewar et al.2021, Singh<br />

et al. 2015 and Shivamurthy and Biradar 2014). This might be due to foliar applied nutrients<br />

sustain proper leaf nutrition as well as carbon balance and improving photosynthetic capacity.<br />

Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts<br />

868 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

References<br />

Asewar, B. V., Pendke, M. S., Narale, S. H., Gopinath, K. A. and Chary, G. R. 2021. Stress<br />

management in rainfed Bt. cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) through foliar sprays. Indian<br />

J. Agron., 66(3): 117-121.<br />

COCPC 2020). Committee on Cotton Production and Consumption.<br />

//cotcorp.org.in/statistics.aspx.<br />

Singh, K., Rathore, P. and Gumber, R. K. 2015. Effects <strong>of</strong> foliar application <strong>of</strong> nutrients on<br />

growth and yield <strong>of</strong> Bt cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Bangladesh J. Bot., 44(1): 9-<br />

14.<br />

Singh V., Pallaghy C. K. and Singh D. 2006. Phosphorus nutrition and tolerance <strong>of</strong> cotton to<br />

water stress I. Seed cotton yield and leaf morphology. Field Crops Res., 96 (2-3): 191-<br />

198.<br />

Shivamurthy D. and Biradar D. P. 2014. Effect <strong>of</strong> foliar nutrition on growth, yield attributes<br />

and seed cotton yield <strong>of</strong> Bt cotton. Karnataka J. Agric. Sci., 27(1): 5-8.<br />

T6-31P-1274<br />

Production Potential and Economic Feasibility <strong>of</strong> Pigeonpea base<br />

Intercropping System in Scarcity Zone <strong>of</strong> Maharashtra<br />

D. K. Kathmale, R. M. Gethe, S. V. Khadtare and V. M. Amrutsagar<br />

All India Coordinated Research Project for Dryland Agriculture, Main Center, Solapur- 413 002<br />

Maharashtra (India)<br />

zarssolapur@gmail.com<br />

Intercropping is generally practiced on small farms with limited resources and it has been<br />

observed to enhance yields with greater stability in a variety <strong>of</strong> crop combinations. On-farm<br />

biodiversity is also promoted by diversification <strong>of</strong> crops in mixed cropping, intercropping and<br />

agr<strong>of</strong>orestry systems resulting in variation <strong>of</strong> diet and net returns, stability, proper utilization<br />

<strong>of</strong> limited resources human labour-force under low levels <strong>of</strong> technological intervention (Anil<br />

et al, 1998). Pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan) is a multi-purpose grain legume, particularly grown in<br />

the semi-arid tropics. This region has the wide rainfall variability and the rainfall during kharif<br />

season is <strong>of</strong>ten ill distributed. It has capacity to adjust to the poor agro-ecological conditions<br />

prevalent in this region. India is a principal pigeon pea growing country accounting for<br />

approximately 90% <strong>of</strong> the total world production. In India, it is the second most cultivatable<br />

pulse crop after chickpea which is cultivated on about 3.62 million ha (Sarkar et al, 2020).<br />

Pigeon pea is suitable for intercropping with different crops like soybean, green gram,<br />

black gram and cowpea for increasing production, proper land utilization and<br />

869 | Page Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

maintaining soil fertility. The initial slow growth rate and deep root system <strong>of</strong> pigeon<br />

pea <strong>of</strong>fers a good scope for intercropping with fast growing early maturing and shallow<br />

rooted crops. Considering these points an experiment was conducted to evaluate<br />

comparative performance <strong>of</strong> the pigeon pea based intercropping system.<br />

Methodology<br />

The field evaluation <strong>of</strong> pigeonpea base intercropping systems was carried out on at the Dry<br />

Farming Research Station, Solapur (MS) with an objective to study the production potential<br />

and economics <strong>of</strong> pigeonpea based inter cropping systems under rainfed condition. The<br />

experiment was conducted for three consecutive years during kharif seasons <strong>of</strong> 2015-16 to<br />

2017-18. The experimental soil was low in available N (138 kg/ha), medium in available P2O5<br />

(10.23 kg/ ha) and higher in available K 2O (454 kg/ha). The organic carbon content was low<br />

(0.38%) with pH (7.84) and electrical conductivity <strong>of</strong> 0.17dS/m. The experiment was laid out<br />

in randomized block design with three replications. In all, 9 treatments comprising five sole<br />

crops viz. pigeonpea, clusterbean, soybean, pearl millet, sunflower and four intercropping<br />

systems viz. pigeonpea + clusterbean (1:5), pigeonpea + soybean (1:5), pigeonpea<br />

+pearlmillet(1:3) and pigeonpea+ sunflower(1:3). The crops were given the recommended<br />

fertilizer dose and raised with recommended agronomic practices <strong>of</strong> MPKV Rahuri.<br />

Results<br />

The result revealed that, the yield <strong>of</strong> different crops in intercrops was influenced significantly<br />

by different treatments (Table). Higher yield under sole crops was recorded under sole soybean.<br />

While pigeonpea grain yield in association with different intercropping ranged between 610 to<br />

741 kg/ha and 1146 to 1347 kg/ha grain and straw yield, respectively. The pigeonpea grain<br />

equivalent yield (1637 kg/ha) was significantly higher in pigeonpea + sunflower 1:2<br />

intercropping system. While, pigeonpea + soybean (1:5) was second in order. Among the sole<br />

crops highest yield <strong>of</strong> 1862 kg/ha was recorded in sunflower. The highest LER (1.57) was<br />

observed in pigeonpea + sunflower (1:3) intercropping system followed by pigeon pea +<br />

soybean (1:5) was observed in intercropping system. Economic analysis revealed that the<br />

intercropping in pigeonpea + sunflower (1:3) recorded maximum gross monetary returns<br />

Rs.73,674/ha and Net Monetary returns Rs.30,872/ha and B:C ratio (1.72) followed by sole<br />

sunflower with gross monetary returns Rs.53706/ha and net monetary returns Rs.21141/ha and<br />

B:C ratio (1.65).<br />

Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts<br />

870 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Sr.<br />

No.<br />

Yield <strong>of</strong> Main crop, Pigeonpea equivalent yield and LER as influence by various<br />

intercropping treatment under rainfed condition<br />

Treatment<br />

Main crop<br />

yield kg/ha<br />

Intercrop<br />

yield kg/ha<br />

Grain Straw Grain Straw<br />

Pigeonpea<br />

equivalent<br />

yield<br />

kg/ha<br />

LER<br />

NMR<br />

(Rs/ha)<br />

T 1 Sole pigeon pea 884 1391 0 0 8862 1.26 946 1<br />

T 2<br />

Sole clusterbean<br />

gum<br />

547 846 0 0 10204 1.40 791 1<br />

T 3 Sole soybean 1235 1492 0 0 22829 1.60 1356 1<br />

T 4 Sole pearl millet 1131 3633 0 0 6986 1.31 664 1<br />

T 5 Sole sunflower 1055 1533 0 0 21141 1.65 1193 1<br />

T 6<br />

T 7<br />

T 8<br />

T 9<br />

References<br />

Pigeon pea +<br />

cluster bean<br />

Pigeon pea +<br />

soybean<br />

Pigeon pea + pearl<br />

millet<br />

Pigeon pea +<br />

sunflower<br />

B:C<br />

ratio<br />

632 1278 231 392 2818 1.07 1007 1.14<br />

741 1347 747 906 27248 1.62 1581 1.44<br />

610 1146 812 1036 7382 1.19 1022 1.41<br />

662 1206 864 963 30874 1.72 1637 1.57<br />

SE+/- 46<br />

Cd (P=0.05) 141<br />

CV (%) 14.9<br />

Anil, L., Park, J., Phipps, R.H., Miller, F.A. 1998. Temperate intercropping <strong>of</strong> cereals<br />

for forage: A review <strong>of</strong> the potential for growth and utilization with particular<br />

reference to the UK. Grass and Forage Sci. 53: 301-317. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-<br />

2494.1998.00144<br />

Sarkar,S., Panda,S., Yadav, K.K., and Kandasamy., 2020 Pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan) an<br />

important food legume in Indian scenario– A review. Legume Res. 43, 601-610<br />

871 | Page Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

T6-32P-1306<br />

Decomposition <strong>of</strong> Agricultural Growth by Sources in Andhra Pradesh<br />

G. Samba Siva, C. A. Rama Rao, B. M. K. Raju and N. Swapna<br />

ICAR-Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, Hyderabad 500059<br />

The growth <strong>of</strong> agricultural sector and the sources <strong>of</strong> growth in the crop sector in Andhra<br />

Pradesh are identified by following growth accounting approach. Increase in real prices and<br />

technological change accounted for bulk <strong>of</strong> the output growth in the crop sector where as<br />

diversification and area expansion accounted for smaller fraction <strong>of</strong> the growth in Andhra<br />

Pradesh. The analysis was done for the period 2005-06 to 2016-17 for the data obtained from<br />

the Department <strong>of</strong> Agriculture, Cooperation and Farmers’ Welfare, Government <strong>of</strong> India and<br />

from the publications or web sites <strong>of</strong> the states <strong>of</strong> Andhra Pradesh. For decomposing the output<br />

growth, data on area, yield and farm harvest prices were considered for 15 crops in Andhra<br />

Pradesh accounting for more than 75 per cent <strong>of</strong> gross cropped area. The farm harvest prices<br />

were adjusted for inflation using the GDP deflator.<br />

Sources <strong>of</strong> growth within crop production sector were identified by the method as given in<br />

Joshi et al. (2006). The change in revenue from the crop production sector was decomposed in<br />

the form <strong>of</strong> following equation:<br />

<br />

∂R ≅ a Y P ∂ A + A (a P ∂Y ) + A (a Y ∂P ) + A (P Y ∂a )<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

Where A, Y, P and Rare total area, yield, price and revenue and the subscript i denotes the crop<br />

and a i = A i/A i. This equation presents the total change in the revenue from crop sector as a<br />

total <strong>of</strong> (i) change in the total cropped area, (ii) change in real prices <strong>of</strong> the crop commodities,<br />

(iii) change in the crop yields or technological change, (iv) changes in the cropping pattern or<br />

diversification. A small fraction <strong>of</strong> the total change arising out <strong>of</strong> the interaction among the<br />

four factors is not captured.<br />

Decomposition <strong>of</strong> growth by source<br />

The results <strong>of</strong> analysis <strong>of</strong> sources <strong>of</strong> growth show that the growth in crop sector was largely<br />

driven by the change in real prices. The change in real farm harvest prices <strong>of</strong> the crops accounted<br />

for 61.1 per cent change in the total crop revenue in Andhra Pradesh. Yield or Technological<br />

change as reflected in the yield growth also contributed to 34.1 per cent to the total change.<br />

Changes in cropping pattern or diversification accounted for a mere 3 per cent change in Andhra<br />

Pradesh. The contribution <strong>of</strong> area expansion was found to be negative (3.4 %) indicating the<br />

competition for limited land resources and a small fraction <strong>of</strong> total change arising out <strong>of</strong> the<br />

interaction effect (5.1%).<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts<br />

872 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

It can be observed that the total cropped area in Andhra Pradesh saw a drop <strong>of</strong> 1.9 per cent<br />

during the period 2004-05 to 2016-17 (Table 1). The area under cotton (113.8%), maize<br />

(33.2%), dry chillies (25.3%), pigeon pea (14.6%) and Chick pea (7.7%) increased noticeably,<br />

whereas the area under mesta (88.5%), turmeric (69.5%), castor seed (66.4%), sorghum<br />

(51.8%), finger millet (48.2%), sesame (40.8%), pearl millet (40.3%), groundnut (38.4%),<br />

tobacco (14.5%), rice (0.9%) and other crops (15.2%) decreased during the period 2004-05 to<br />

2016-17 in the state <strong>of</strong> Andhra Pradesh.<br />

Change in area and yield under major crops between 2004-05 and 2016-17<br />

S. No Crop Area (000 ha) Yield (Q/ha)<br />

1 Rice -31.9 (-0.9) 4.62 (15.3)<br />

2 Maize 237.2 (33.2) 6.33 (17.9)<br />

3 Pearl millet -31.7 (-40.3) 5.74 (64.9)<br />

4 Sorghum -236.1 (-51.8) 6.23 (56.2)<br />

5 Finger millet -31.1 (-48.2) -1.28 (-10.7)<br />

6 Chick pea 34.3 (7.7) -1.55 (-12.6)<br />

7 Pigeonpea 67.1 (14.6) 0.25 (5.1)<br />

8 Groundnut -646.5 (-38.4) 1.69 (23.3)<br />

9 Sesame -59.8 (-40.8) 0.95 (41.9)<br />

10 Castor Seed -181.1 (-66.4) 1.19 (29.2)<br />

11 Cotton 1206.9 (113.8) 0.76 (21.9)<br />

12 Mesta -48.8 (-88.5) -0.98 (-6.2)<br />

13 Turmeric -45.4 (-69.5) -4.39 (-6.4)<br />

14 Tobacco -18.8 (-14.5) 9.92 (70.8)<br />

15 Dry Chilies 52.5 (25.3) 9.95 (30.2)<br />

16 Other crops -513.3 (-15.2) -<br />

Total -246.4 (-1.9) -<br />

Source: Authors’ estimate using data from Directorate <strong>of</strong> Economics and Statistics (DES) and Figures in the<br />

Parenthesis indicates percentage<br />

Yield growth is one <strong>of</strong> the important driver <strong>of</strong> crop revenue growth and is a function <strong>of</strong> adoption<br />

<strong>of</strong> high yielding crop varieties, agricultural mechanization, increased use <strong>of</strong> yield enhancing<br />

inputs such as fertilizer nutrients, etc. (Singh and Pal, 2010). In Andhra Pradesh, yield <strong>of</strong><br />

tobacco, pearl millet and sorghum increased by more than 50 per cent between 2004 and 2016.<br />

Other crops also witnessed considerable yield growth during this period (Table 1).<br />

Conclusion<br />

Andhra Pradesh did better in terms <strong>of</strong> contribution <strong>of</strong> price, technology and diversification<br />

effects. The contribution <strong>of</strong> area expansion was either marginal or negative showing the limited<br />

scope for considering an extensive agriculture as a source <strong>of</strong> further growth in agriculture.<br />

873 | Page Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Thus, there is a need for promoting diversification by investing in processing, marketing and<br />

institutional infrastructure in Andhra Pradesh. Considering the diversity <strong>of</strong> agricultural setting,<br />

only a regionally differentiated approach to research, extension and infrastructure development<br />

seems appropriate.<br />

References<br />

Directorate <strong>of</strong> Economics and Statistics. (2019). State Domestic Product and other aggregates, 2011-<br />

2012 series. Ministry <strong>of</strong> Statistics and Programme Implementation, New Delhi.<br />

Joshi, P. K., Birthal, P. S., & Minot, N. (2006). Sources <strong>of</strong> Agricultural Growth in India: Role <strong>of</strong><br />

Diversification toward High-Value Crops. MTID Discussion Paper 85, International Food<br />

Policy Research Institute, Washington, DC.<br />

Singh, A., & Pal, S. (2010). The Changing Pattern and Sources <strong>of</strong> Agricultural Growth in India. In: The<br />

Shifting Patterns <strong>of</strong> Agricultural Production and Productivity Worldwide (Alston, J. M.,<br />

Babcock, B. A., & Pardey, P. G, eds.). Midwest Agribusiness Trade Research and Information<br />

Center, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa.<br />

Diversification in Agriculture Boon for Farmers.<br />

T6-33P-1312<br />

U.N. Umesh, Kumari Vibha Rani*, Sanjeev Ranjan, Jyoti Sinha, Brajendu Kumar and<br />

Amrendra Kumar<br />

Krishi Vigyan Kendra,Nalanda<br />

*kumarivibhaa1@gmail.com<br />

Erratic rainfall is a major problem for farming community. In 2021 there was heavy rainfall in<br />

September -October. It leads to heavy loss <strong>of</strong> paddy crop during 2021 and late sowing <strong>of</strong> rabi<br />

crop. In most part <strong>of</strong> area <strong>of</strong> Nalanda district major soil type is clay loam. It retains moisture<br />

for longer duration and also leads to late sowing <strong>of</strong> rabi crops. In changing climatic condition<br />

there is sudden rise in temperature during last week <strong>of</strong> February and heat wave started from<br />

15-20 March and leads to premature drying <strong>of</strong> all rabi crops during 2022 and lead to heavy<br />

reduction in yield. To overcome these adverse situations, we selected village Sherpur under<br />

NICRA project <strong>of</strong> Nalanda District. In this village land situation is low, medium and upland.<br />

In low land area there is water logged situation for few months(flood) and some upland area<br />

comes under moisture stress also. According to land situation and climatic condition there are<br />

four types <strong>of</strong> typologies as moisture stress with animal, irrigated with animal, irrigated without<br />

animal and flooded with animal. We are conducting several interventions such as different<br />

varieties <strong>of</strong> paddy, green gram, okra (Variety Kashi Lalima), Mushroom cultivation, backyard<br />

poultry, fisheries, and papaya cultivation on the bund <strong>of</strong> ponds under NICRA project since<br />

January 2022. It lead to increase in the income <strong>of</strong> the farmers and they are using different new<br />

technologies i.e. ZT, brush cutter, bund maker, power weeders etc. We are introducing Zero<br />

Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts<br />

874 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

till technology for time saving and reducing the cost <strong>of</strong> cultivation and maximum utilization <strong>of</strong><br />

resources.<br />

T6-34P-1320<br />

Capacity Needs Assessment for Integrating Nutrition Objectives into<br />

Extension Advisory Service (EAS) Programs<br />

Veenita Kumari and Shirisha Junuthula<br />

National Institute <strong>of</strong> Agricultural Extension Management (MANAGE), Telangana-500030, India<br />

Even after several decades <strong>of</strong> green revolution, malnutrition continues to be a major<br />

development challenge in most <strong>of</strong> the South Asian countries, and India has a major share <strong>of</strong> the<br />

malnourished population in the region (Gomez et al. 2013). The nutritional issues in India are<br />

complex and therefore require a multi-faceted, multi-disciplinary solution. One facet <strong>of</strong> the<br />

solution is enriching knowledge about the causes <strong>of</strong> and solutions to malnutrition at the farm<br />

and household level, through agricultural extension (Lal, 2020). Disseminating nutritionsensitive<br />

agricultural knowledge is not currently an activity <strong>of</strong> agricultural extension in India<br />

(Kadiyala et al. 2018), but there is a great potential for integrating it through the wellestablished<br />

network <strong>of</strong> extension <strong>of</strong>ficers.<br />

The objectives <strong>of</strong> the study are: -<br />

To assess the nutrition and NAS related knowledge, skill, and attitude <strong>of</strong> the EAS<br />

<strong>of</strong>ficers in Agriculture & Allied sectors working at various levels<br />

To identify the learning needs and training priorities among the EAS staff in relation to<br />

NSA<br />

Methodology<br />

An online survey was conducted to assess the learning needs <strong>of</strong> the <strong>of</strong>ficers working at ‘Field<br />

Level Staff (FLS)’ and ‘Mid-Senior Level Staff (MLS)’, to understand their capacities and their<br />

learning needs. The study was conducted with respondents selected across India. These<br />

respondents were the participants who had attended a training program in the past two years<br />

(2018-19) at MANAGE. Due to the ongoing pandemic situation <strong>of</strong> COVID-19, the survey was<br />

conducted via online mode using Google forms sent to the respondents through email. A total<br />

<strong>of</strong> 168 responses were received among which, 100 at Mid-senior level and 68 at field level.<br />

Results<br />

The surveyed EAS staff were in the productive age group (30 to above 60 years) so, by<br />

providing the NSA trainings their potential can be enhanced to contribute towards agriculture<br />

and nutrition fields. However, gender wise participation data showed that female participation<br />

875 | Page Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

was low when compared to that <strong>of</strong> male participation which needs immediate attention by the<br />

Government and policy makers.<br />

In terms <strong>of</strong> nutritional awareness among FLS and MLS staff, they have good awareness<br />

regarding the contributors <strong>of</strong> good health and impacts <strong>of</strong> poor nutrition. This awareness<br />

will be helpful in guiding the farming community towards tackling malnutrition.<br />

Majority <strong>of</strong> the respondents reported that they had noticed under nutrition and over<br />

nutrition cases, which is clear evidence that India is facing the double burden <strong>of</strong><br />

nutrition. By making use <strong>of</strong> the EAS staff at farming community, nutritional problems<br />

can be addressed to some extent.<br />

The dietary needs <strong>of</strong> an individual depend upon factors such as age, gender, education,<br />

health status and physiological conditions. The analyzed data from the survey showed<br />

that MSL group have more awareness than the FLS group. This is because they had<br />

already attended many training programs in relation to nutrition.<br />

Training on Nutrition related areas adequate to build capacity in tackling nutritional problems<br />

The top 5 areas felt important by FLS respondents in the order <strong>of</strong> importance were: 1.<br />

Nutrition education, 2. Locally available nutritious crops, varieties and species, 3.<br />

Promoting the role <strong>of</strong> women farmers in production/marketing/value addition in ways<br />

that would not increase their work burden, 4. Promotion <strong>of</strong> diversification <strong>of</strong> crops and<br />

5. Promotion <strong>of</strong> kitchen gardens. The MSL group ranked NSA topics in the order <strong>of</strong>: 1.<br />

Promotion <strong>of</strong> kitchen gardens, 2. Promotion <strong>of</strong> diversification <strong>of</strong> crops, 3. Locally<br />

available nutritious crops, varieties and species, 4. Nutrition education and 4. Promoting<br />

the role <strong>of</strong> women farmers in production/ marketing/ value addition in ways that would<br />

not increase their work burden and 5. Promotion <strong>of</strong> value addition <strong>of</strong> crops/ horticultural<br />

nutrient crops.<br />

Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts<br />

876 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Conclusion<br />

The reasons for this were lack <strong>of</strong> NSA mandate, lack <strong>of</strong> induction program with nutrition topic,<br />

lack <strong>of</strong> resources, manpower, knowledge and awareness, lack <strong>of</strong> commitment, responsibility,<br />

lack <strong>of</strong> collaborations with other institutions, low availability or use ICE/ICT material and<br />

administrational problems. Immediate action is needed to train the EAS staff on nutritional<br />

concepts to achieve the Sustainable developmental goals (SDGs).<br />

References<br />

Gomez, M. I., Barrett, C. B., Raney, T., Pinstrup-Andersen, P., Meerman, J., Croppenstedt, A.,<br />

Carisma, B and Thompson, B. 2013. Post-green revolution food systems and the triple<br />

burden <strong>of</strong> malnutrition. Food Policy, 42, 129-138.<br />

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2013.06.009.<br />

Kadiyala, S., Prost, A., Harris-Fry, H., O Hearn, M., Pradhan, R., Pradhan, S and Allen, E.<br />

2018. Upscaling Participatory Action and Videos for Agriculture and Nutrition<br />

(UPAVAN) trial comparing three variants <strong>of</strong> a nutrition-sensitive agricultural<br />

extension intervention to improve maternal and child nutritional outcomes in rural<br />

Odisha, India: study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial. Trials, 19(1),<br />

1-16.<br />

Lal, R. 2020. Home gardening and urban agriculture for advancing food and nutritional security<br />

in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Food security, 12(4), 871-876.<br />

Studies on Productivity and Economics <strong>of</strong> Different Maize based<br />

Intercropping Systems under Rainfed Conditions <strong>of</strong> Jammu<br />

T6-35P-1326<br />

A.P. Singh 1* , G. Ravindra Chary 2 , A. Gopinath 2 , Jai Kumar 3 , Brinder Singh 1 ,<br />

Rohit Shrama 1 and Sunny Raina 1<br />

1 All India Coordinated Project for Dryland agriculture, Rakh-Dhiansar, Samba (UT <strong>of</strong> J & K),<br />

2 ICAR-Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, Hyderabad, Telangana,<br />

3 Sher-e-Kashmir University <strong>of</strong> Agricultural Sciences and Technology <strong>of</strong> Jammu, Rakh Dhiansar,<br />

Jammu, Jammu and Kashmir (UT) 181 133<br />

*apsinghagron@gmail.com<br />

Maize is the third most grain crop in India after rice and wheat. Intercropping in maize with<br />

short duration legumes, oilseeds and others has potential to obtain high productivity and<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>itability at low water use without reducing its own yield (Sharma et al., 2013) Intercropping<br />

provides insurance against crop failure or unstable market prices. Inclusion <strong>of</strong> legumes in a<br />

system as intercrop, not only supplement nitrogen to the base crop but also increases the amount<br />

877 | Page Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

<strong>of</strong> humus in the soil due to decaying crop remains (Shyamal Kheroar et al., 2013). Maizelegume<br />

intercropping system besides increasing productivity and pr<strong>of</strong>itability <strong>of</strong> the crops also<br />

improves soil health, conserves soil moisture and increases total turnout (Ummed et al., 2008).<br />

Plant population in an intercropping system affects the balance <strong>of</strong> competition crop and overall<br />

productivity. Wide inter-row space in maize during the initial growth period provides ample<br />

scope to cultivate the intercrops to increase the crop productivity and economic returns per unit<br />

area and time. Hence, in peasant subsistence agriculture adoption <strong>of</strong> appropriate cropping<br />

systems enables the farmers to use natural resources efficiently<br />

Methodology<br />

A field experiment was carried out at research farm <strong>of</strong> Advanced Centre for Dryland<br />

Agriculture, Sher-e-Kashmir University <strong>of</strong> Agricultural Sciences and Technology <strong>of</strong> Jammu at<br />

Rakh Dhiansar during Kharif, 2020. Experiment comprises <strong>of</strong> nine treatments viz: - Maize,<br />

Cowpea, Green gram, Marrigold, Blackgram, Maize + Cowpea (1:1), Maize + Greengram<br />

(1:1), Maize + Marrigold (1:1), Maize + Blackgram (1:1) were tested in randomized block<br />

design under sandy loam soil having slightly acidic in nature, well drained low in carbon,<br />

(0.22), low in available nitrogen (162 kg ha -1 ) and potassium (102 kg ha -1 ) and medimum in<br />

available phosphorous (14.4 kg ha -1 ). Maize, Cowpea, Black gram, Green gram and Marigold<br />

were sown under different cropping sequences as per technical programme given during Kharif<br />

2020 and the recommended package and practices were followed as per the crop sown.<br />

Results<br />

Evaluation <strong>of</strong> different maize-based intercropping systems during kharif under rainfed conditions.<br />

Treatment<br />

Yield<br />

(q ha -1 ) MEY<br />

Main Intercrop<br />

(q ha -1 )<br />

crop<br />

LER<br />

COC<br />

(Rs<br />

ha -1 )<br />

Net<br />

Retuns<br />

(Rs. ha -1 )<br />

B:C<br />

Ratio<br />

RWUE<br />

(kg ha -1<br />

mm -1 )<br />

T1 Maize 23.50 - 23.50 - 23700 29434 2.24 4.82<br />

T2 Cowpea 11.30 - 39.38 - 15750 57700 4.66 8.08<br />

T3 Greengram 5.60 - 24.02 - 18000 26797 2.49 4.93<br />

T4 Marrigold 20.00 - 21.45 - 35000 85000 3.43 4.40<br />

T5 Blackgram 4.75 - 17.83 - 17500 15753 1.90 3.66<br />

T6<br />

T7<br />

T8<br />

Maize +<br />

Cowpea (1:1)<br />

Maize +<br />

Greengram<br />

(1:1)<br />

Maize +<br />

Marrigold<br />

(1:1)<br />

20.60 3.70 34.49 1.20 27000 45353 2.68 7.07<br />

19.00 1.70 26.29 1.11 28500 27831 1.98 5.39<br />

19.50 5.00 24.86 1.08 29500 24356 1.83 5.10<br />

Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts<br />

878 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

T9<br />

Maize +<br />

Blackgram<br />

(1:1)<br />

18.75 1.55 24.57 1.12 27500 25444 1.93 5.04<br />

CD (5%) - - 3.85.0 - - - - -<br />

Among the different intercropping systems highest maize equivalent yield (MEY) <strong>of</strong> 3449 kg<br />

ha -1 was obtained in maize + cowpea (1:1) with the corresponding highest values <strong>of</strong> net returns,<br />

LER, B:C ratio and RWUE <strong>of</strong> Rs. 45353 ha -1 , 1.20, 2.68 and 7.07 kg ha -1 -mm, respectively<br />

over Maize + greengram (1:1) with the corresponding values <strong>of</strong> net returns, LER, B:C ratio and<br />

RWUE <strong>of</strong> Rs. 27831 ha -1 , 1.11, 1.98 and 5.39 kg ha -1 -mm, respectively. Maize+marigold (1:1)<br />

with the corresponding values <strong>of</strong> net returns, LER, B:C ratio and RWUE <strong>of</strong> Rs. 2468 kg ha -1 -<br />

mm, 1.08, 1.83 and 5.10 kg ha -1 -mm, respectively. Similar higher net returns and B:C ration<br />

was obtained by Marer et al., 2007 followed by While the lowest MEY <strong>of</strong> 2457 kg ha -1 was<br />

registered in maize + blackgram (1:1) treatment with RWUE <strong>of</strong> 5.04 kg ha -1 -mm owever,<br />

among the sole systems, sole cowpea registered highest maize equivalent yield to the tune <strong>of</strong><br />

3938 kg ha -1 while the lowest MEY <strong>of</strong> 1783 kg ha -1 was obtained in sole blackgram. Similar<br />

findings were observed by Parimala devi et al., 2019 under maize-based intercropping.<br />

Conclusion<br />

In can be safely concluded that highest maize equivalent yield can be realized by adopting the<br />

Maize + cowpea (1:1) intercropping system instead <strong>of</strong> growing the sole maize, which not only<br />

improved the crop productivity and economic returns per unit area and time while it also<br />

provide the ways to avert total crop failures in rainfed farming situations in the face <strong>of</strong> weather<br />

aberrations particularly during Kharif season<br />

References<br />

Parimaladevi C, Ramanathan SP, Senthil Kumar N, Suresh S. 2019. Evaluation <strong>of</strong> maize based<br />

intercropping systems in Thamirabarani basins <strong>of</strong> Tamil Nadu. J. Pharmacognosy<br />

Phytochem., (8): 4051-4056.<br />

Sharma A, Maruthi Sankar S, Arora S, Guptav, Singh B, Kumar J, Mishra P K. 2013. Analyzing<br />

effects for sustainable rainfed maize productivity in foothills <strong>of</strong> Northwest Himalayas.<br />

Field Crop Res., 145: 96-105.<br />

Shyamal Kheroar and Bikas Chandra Patra. 2013. Advances <strong>of</strong> maize legume Intercropping<br />

systems. J. Agric. Sci. Techn., 733-744.<br />

Umeed S, Saad A A and Singh S R. 2008. Production potential, biological feasibility and<br />

economic viability <strong>of</strong> maize (Zea mays)- based intercropping systems under rainfed<br />

conditions. Indian J. Agric. Sci., 78(12) 1023-1027.<br />

879 | Page Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Integration <strong>of</strong> Millet Crops in Rice Fallow Ecology for System<br />

Intensification<br />

U. Triveni, Y. S. Rani, N. Anuradha and T.S.S.K. Patro<br />

T6-36P-1376<br />

Acharya N.G.Ranga Agricultural University, Agricultural Research Station, Vizianagaram, Andhra<br />

Pradesh 535 001<br />

Increase in food grain production is essential for feeding the current global population.<br />

However, increase in crop area is not possible due to various issues like environmental<br />

concerns, urbanization, industrialization, salinization, etc. Hence crop intensification in the<br />

existing land area is the only option to increase the food grain production in India. Rice fallow<br />

lands are low land rainfed rice growing areas which remain fallow during winter season. These<br />

lands have enormous scope for crop intensification by integrating pulses and oil seeds. In India,<br />

11.7 M.ha <strong>of</strong> rice fallow land is available across various states (Ali et al., 2014). Chhattisgarh<br />

has 35% (4.1 Mha) <strong>of</strong> rice fallow land Odisha and Madhya Pradesh together have 15% (1.8 M<br />

ha). Southern states like Andhra Pradesh, Karnataka and Telangana together have 7.38 M ha<br />

rice fallow land (Gumma et al., 2016). Millets have a greater scope for crop intensification<br />

because <strong>of</strong> their shorter duration, low moisture requirement, biotic and abiotic stress tolerance.<br />

Moreover, Southern and Central India contributed to most millet area and production in the<br />

country. Hence, introduction <strong>of</strong> short duration millet crops in the existing rice fallow lands<br />

would greatly contribute not only to increased millet grain production but also to increased<br />

nutritional security.<br />

Methodology<br />

An experiment was conducted during rabi, 2021-22 at Agricultural Research Station,<br />

Vizianagaram with an aim to test the feasibility <strong>of</strong> eight different millet crops for growing<br />

under rice fallow lands. The millet crops (sorghum, pearl millet, finger millet, foxtail millet,<br />

barnyard millet, brown top millet, kodo millet and little millet) were tested in randomized block<br />

design with three replications. NPK nutrients were applied as per crop recommendations. A<br />

spacing <strong>of</strong> 22.5cm × 10cm was adopted for all the crops except for pearl millet and sorghum,<br />

where 45cm × 10cm was used. Observations on growth and yield attributes and grain yield<br />

were collected at the time <strong>of</strong> maturity and data analysis was done by using ANOVA.<br />

Results<br />

Experiment was conducted to evaluate the performance <strong>of</strong> different millet crops under ricefallows<br />

revealed that all the millet crops adopted very well in rice fallow lands. However, the<br />

sorghum grain yield was higher. This was followed by millet yields (Fig). Among other millets,<br />

the grain yield <strong>of</strong> finger millet, pearl millet, foxtail millet and kodo millet were also higher. Per<br />

Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts<br />

880 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

day productivity was highest with sorghum, but it was closely followed by pearl millet, finger<br />

millet and foxtail millet. Per day productivity <strong>of</strong> barnyard millet was higher than kodo millet<br />

due to its shorter duration. Little millet crop recorded lowest grain yield and per day<br />

productivity. Hence, little millet crop was not pr<strong>of</strong>itable to be grown under rice fallows.<br />

Because <strong>of</strong> the shorter duration and higher per day productivity, pearl millet and foxtail millet<br />

were found best with limited supplemental irrigation. With sufficient supplemental irrigation,<br />

sorghum, finger millet and kodo millet resulted in good economic yields.<br />

Grain yield (kg/ha)<br />

Per day productivity (Kg/ha/day)<br />

Grain yield (kg/ha)<br />

4000<br />

3500<br />

3000<br />

2500<br />

2000<br />

1500<br />

1000<br />

500<br />

0<br />

35.0<br />

30.0<br />

25.0<br />

20.0<br />

15.0<br />

10.0<br />

5.0<br />

0.0<br />

Per day productivity (kg/ha/day)<br />

Grain yield and per day productivity <strong>of</strong> different millet crops under rice fallow condition<br />

Nutritive values <strong>of</strong> millet fodder were far superior as compared to paddy straw (Chaudhry,<br />

1998). Hence, millet fodder would be the ideal source <strong>of</strong> cattle feed. Among different millet<br />

crops tested under rice fallow situation, highest fodder yield was recorded with sorghum and it<br />

was closely followed by the fodder yields <strong>of</strong> finger millet and kodo millet. The longer growing<br />

period <strong>of</strong> these crops might be the reason for higher biomass accumulation as compared to the<br />

other millet crops.<br />

Conclusion<br />

From this study it was concluded that sorghum and finger millet recorded higher yields under<br />

rice fallow lands provided with sufficient supplemental irrigation. Pearl millet and foxtail millet<br />

will be best suitable under limited supplemental irrigation due to shorter duration coupled with<br />

high productivity.<br />

References<br />

Ali, M., Ghosh, P.K., Hazra, K.K. 2014. Resource conservation technologies in rice fallow. In:<br />

Ghosh et al (eds) Resource conservation technology in pulses. Scientific, Jodhpur, pp<br />

83–89.<br />

881 | Page Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Gumma, M.K., Thenkabail, P.S., Teluguntla,P., Rao, M.N., Mohammed, I.A and Whitbread,<br />

A.M. 2016. Mapping rice fallow cropland areas for short-season grain legumes<br />

intensification in South Asia using MODIS 250 m time-series data. Int. J <strong>of</strong> Digit.<br />

Earth, 9,10, 981-1003, DOI: 10.1080/17538947.2016.1168489<br />

Chaudhry, A.R. 1998. Fodders crops in crop production by Shafi Nazir and Elena Bashir<br />

Published by National <strong>Book</strong> Foundation Islamabad 3rd Reprint 1998. 1994; pp. 404-<br />

407.<br />

T6-37P-1386<br />

Impact <strong>of</strong> Millet Consumption Pattern on Lifestyle Diseases <strong>of</strong> the Tribal<br />

and Urban Population, Telangana<br />

Shirisha Junuthula* and V. Vijaya Lakshmi<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>essor Jayashankar Telangana State Agriculture University (PJTSAU), Telangana-500030, India<br />

*siriinscience@gmail.com<br />

Millets grow well in arid and semi-arid environments, requiring less water than any other grain.<br />

While developing countries in Asia still produce most <strong>of</strong> the world's millets. There is an<br />

increasing recognition <strong>of</strong> their favorable nutrient composition and benefits as healthy food<br />

(Jukanti et al., 2016). Thus, apart from their continued strategic role as staple for the poor in<br />

marginal agricultural regions, they are also assuming a new role as a healthy food replacement<br />

for the urban high-income population (Shirisha et al.,2019). Millet is more than just an<br />

interesting alternative to the more common grains. The grain is also rich in phytochemicals,<br />

including phytic acid, which is believed to lower cholesterol, and phytate, which is associated<br />

with reduced cancer risk (Coulibaly et al., 2011). These health benefits have been partly<br />

attributed to a wide variety <strong>of</strong> potential chemo preventive substances, called phytochemicals,<br />

including antioxidants present in high amounts in millets (Izadi et al., 2012), lower incidences<br />

<strong>of</strong> diabetes have been reported in millet-consuming population. Millets also contain phenolic<br />

inhibitors like alpha-glucosidase, pancreatic amylase reduce postprandial hyperglycemia by<br />

partially inhibiting the enzymatic hydrolysis <strong>of</strong> complex carbohydrates (Shobana et al., 2009).<br />

The objectives <strong>of</strong> the study are:-<br />

To study the millet consumption pattern <strong>of</strong> the selected tribal and urban population.<br />

To study the incidence <strong>of</strong> metabolic disorders among selected tribal and urban<br />

Population.<br />

Methodology<br />

The present study focused on millet consumption pattern <strong>of</strong> the tribal and urban population <strong>of</strong><br />

Telangana state. The survey part was carried out in the five <strong>of</strong> the tribal villages <strong>of</strong> Ranga reddy<br />

Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts<br />

882 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

whereas the Urban data was collected from the Hyderabad district <strong>of</strong> Telangana. A total <strong>of</strong> 400<br />

sample were selected for the study among them 200 tribal (men-100 and woman-100) and 200<br />

urban (men-100 and woman-100) population. Random sampling design was adopted for the<br />

study. Data collection was done by using self-developed structured questionnaire.<br />

Results<br />

The results showed that the tribal subjects millet consumption was higher than the urban<br />

population in all the age groups except in the 50-60 years age group. From urban population,<br />

it was noticed that high number <strong>of</strong> males consumed millets than the female population. Millet<br />

consumption in urban respondents was noticed to be high among the 40-60 years <strong>of</strong> age group<br />

which could be because <strong>of</strong> the incidence <strong>of</strong> metabolic disorders, whereas dietary habits<br />

importance and awareness was increasing day by day.<br />

Millet consumption <strong>of</strong> tribal and urban population<br />

Type <strong>of</strong> Millet<br />

Jowar Ragi Pearl millet Korra Samai Arikelu<br />

Tribal male (n=100) 100 - - - - -<br />

Tribal female(n=100) 99 1 - - - -<br />

Urban male (n=100) 14 4 - 2 - -<br />

Urban female(n=100) 10 3 - - - -<br />

The results <strong>of</strong> consumption <strong>of</strong> millet showed that 100% consumption rate among the tribal area,<br />

20% males and 13% females <strong>of</strong> the urban area but when compared to tribal population<br />

diversified consumption can be noticed from the urban population. This could be due to the<br />

high availability and affordability <strong>of</strong> millets by urban population.<br />

The results were adding strong evidence for the earlier results <strong>of</strong> reduced (blood pressure) BP<br />

and FBGs among population with the increased consumption <strong>of</strong> millets. Basal metabolic rate<br />

(BMI) also reduced with consumption frequency <strong>of</strong> millets which means the obese people can<br />

consume the millets in order to reduce their weight.<br />

Variables<br />

Correlation between BMI, BP and FBS with frequency <strong>of</strong> millet consumption<br />

Tribal (N=200)<br />

Frequency <strong>of</strong> millet consumption<br />

Urban(N=200)<br />

Male(n=100) Female(n=100) Male(n=100) Female(n=100)<br />

BMI -0.05 ** 0.11 NS -0.08 ** 0.05 *<br />

BP-Systolic 0.00 * 0.12 NS -0.09 ** 0.05 **<br />

BP-Diastolic -0.12 ** 0.18 NS 0.08 NS 0.11 NS<br />

FBG -0.09 ** -0.02 ** -0.11 ** -0.04 **<br />

Significant Level- P-value * -P


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Conclusion<br />

Transition is evident in diet consumption pattern where a complete shift from locally available<br />

millet consumption is replaced with refined rice and processed foods. Research emphasized on<br />

millet is recognized as nourishing the common population and to help in preventing and curing<br />

the diseases like obesity, diabetes and cardiovascular diseases (CVD). Hence research and<br />

development efforts on these nutritious millets need to be undertaken in order to explore their<br />

full potential.<br />

References<br />

Coulibaly, A., Kouakou, B and Chen, J. 2011. Phytic acid in cereal grains: structure, healthy<br />

or harmful ways to reduce phytic acid in cereal grains and their effects on nutritional<br />

quality. American J. Plant Nutri. Fert. Tech. 1: 1 -22.<br />

Izadi, Z., Nasirpour, A., Izadi, M and Izadi, T. 2012. Reducing blood cholesterol by a healthy<br />

diet. Int. Food. Res. J. 19 (1): 29-37.<br />

Jukanti, A. K., Gowda, C. L., Rai, K. N., Manga, V. K and Bhatt, R. K. 2016. Crops that feed<br />

the world. Pearl Millet (Pennisetum glaucum L.): an important source <strong>of</strong> food security,<br />

nutrition and health in the arid and semi-arid tropics. Food Sec. 8(2), 307-329.<br />

Shirisha, J., Lakshmi, V. V., Devi, K. U and Preethi, M. 2019. Expenditure pattern <strong>of</strong> tribal<br />

and urban population, Telangana. Bulletin <strong>of</strong> Environment, Pharmacology and Life<br />

Sciences. 8 (6):101-104.<br />

Shobana, S., Sreerama, Y.N and Malleshi, N.G. 2009. Composition and enzyme inhibitory<br />

properties <strong>of</strong> Finger Millet (Eleusine Coracana L.) seed coat phenolics: mode <strong>of</strong><br />

Inhibition <strong>of</strong> Α-Glucosidase and pancreatic amylase. Food. Chem. 115: 1268-1273.<br />

Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts<br />

T6-38P-1391<br />

Awareness <strong>of</strong> Natural Resource Management among farm women<br />

Methodology<br />

S.G. Puri, S.G. More and B. V. Asewar<br />

College <strong>of</strong> Agriculture, Golegaon<br />

Present investigation was carried out with the objectives to study pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> the farm women,<br />

to know the awareness level about Natural Resource Management (NRM) among farm women,<br />

to find out the relationship between pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> farm women with awareness level about NRM<br />

in farming system and to invite the suggestions about Natural Resource Management in<br />

farming system in Parbhani District from Marathwada region <strong>of</strong> Maharashtra State. From<br />

Parbhani District five villages Pokharni, Daithna, Rampuri, Salapuri and Dhanora (Kale) were<br />

884 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

purposively selected. Twelve number <strong>of</strong> farm women were selected randomly from these<br />

selected five villages. Thus, totally 60 farm women were interviewed. The data were collected<br />

personally by using the structured interview schedule with major focus on solar energy<br />

utilisation. According to the estimates <strong>of</strong> the International Energy Agency, India is the world’s<br />

fourth largest energy consumer after United States, China and Russia and will be the third<br />

largest by 2030 (Bharati Joshi et al., 1992). Solar energy is the radiant light and heat from the<br />

sun that is harnessed using a range <strong>of</strong> ever-evolving technologies such as solar heating,<br />

photovoltaics, solar thermal energy, solar architecture, molten salt power plants and artificial<br />

photosynthesis (International Energy Agency, 2011).<br />

Results<br />

Findings <strong>of</strong> the study revealed that majority <strong>of</strong> farm women had correct awareness on solar<br />

energy (81.67 per cent) followed by solar energy can also be used in agriculture (80.00 per<br />

cent). In many aspects related to Natural Resource Management among farm women were<br />

unaware. Overall awareness level about Natural Resource Management among farm women<br />

had low awareness. There was positive and highly significant relationship between education,<br />

risk orientation and scientific orientation with their awareness Natural Resource Management.<br />

All (100.00%) <strong>of</strong> the farm women suggested subsidies should be made available to farmers for<br />

solar-powered machinery and farmers are being encouraged to employ solar energy in their<br />

farming systems. Also, majority <strong>of</strong> the farm women suggested that developing the strong<br />

linkage between government and the farmers.<br />

Statement wise distribution <strong>of</strong> awareness level about Natural Resource Management<br />

among farm women .<br />

S No Statement Frequency Percent<br />

1. Do you know about renewable sources <strong>of</strong> energy? 35 58.33<br />

2. Do you know about the solar energy? 49 81.67<br />

3. Is solar energy can also be used in agriculture? 48 80.00<br />

4. Do you know about solar crop and grain dryer? 0 0.00<br />

5. Do you know about solar water heater? 39 65.00<br />

6. Do you know about solar spray pumps? 1 1.67<br />

7. Do you know about solar water lifting pump? 0 0.00<br />

8. Do you know about different types <strong>of</strong> solar water lifting pumps? 1 1.67<br />

9. Do you know direct current (DC) and alternate current (AC) solar<br />

pumps?<br />

10. Do you know about the land size required for 1 HP, 3 HP, 5 HP and 7<br />

HP pump?<br />

11. Do you know the approximate cost <strong>of</strong> a solar water pump system <strong>of</strong> 1<br />

HP, 3 HP, 5 HP and 7 HP?<br />

0 0.00<br />

0 0.00<br />

1 1.67<br />

12. Do you know about the operating cost <strong>of</strong> solar pumps? 3 5.00<br />

885 | Page Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

13. Are there any criteria for selecting where to install the solar water<br />

pump sets?<br />

0 0.00<br />

14. Do you know about the components <strong>of</strong> photovoltaic water pumps? 0 0.00<br />

15. Does solar energy help to solve the irrigation problem? 5 8.33<br />

16. Can solar water pump integrate with drip/sprinkler system <strong>of</strong><br />

irrigation?<br />

1 1.67<br />

17. Does solar pump require any repair and maintenance? 5 8.33<br />

18. Is it necessary to clean the panels? 42 70.00<br />

19. Can solar system use batteries to store extra power for use at night? 1 1.67<br />

20. Is it possible to couple batteries with a solar powered pump system? 1 1.67<br />

21 Do you know about solar lanterns? 2 3.33<br />

22 Do you know about solar street lights? 40 66.67<br />

23 Do you know about solar household electrical system? 1 1.67<br />

24 Do you know about solar photovoltaic sprayer? 0 0.00<br />

Coefficient <strong>of</strong> correlation between pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> farm women with awareness level<br />

about Natural Resource Management in farming system<br />

Sr. No. Independent variable Coefficient <strong>of</strong> correlation (r)<br />

1 Age -0.231 NS<br />

2 Education 0.493**<br />

3 Occupation 0.193 NS<br />

4 Land holding 0.049 NS<br />

5 Annual income 0.004 NS<br />

6 Extension contact -0.238 NS<br />

7 Risk orientation 0.337**<br />

8 Scientific orientation 0.348**<br />

* Significant at 0.05 level <strong>of</strong> significance<br />

**Significant at 0.01 level <strong>of</strong> significance NS Non-significant<br />

Distribution <strong>of</strong> the farm women according to Suggestions about about Natural Resource<br />

Management in farming system.<br />

Sr. No. Suggestions Frequency Percent<br />

1 Spare components for solar panels should be readily<br />

available on the market.<br />

2 Developing the strong linkage between government and the<br />

farmers.<br />

50 83.33<br />

55 91.66<br />

3 Make the solar water pumps easily available to farmers. 40 66.66<br />

4 Farmers are being encouraged to employ solar energy in<br />

their farming systems.<br />

60 100.00<br />

Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts<br />

886 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

5 Weather predictions should be supplied on a weekly basis<br />

properly village to village.<br />

6 Farmers should be informed on the most up-to-date solar<br />

energy technology.<br />

7 Organize farmer training courses and camps for awareness<br />

<strong>of</strong> solar energy utilization.<br />

8 Subsidies should be made available to farmers for solarpowered<br />

machinery.<br />

30 50.00<br />

52 86.66<br />

55 91.66<br />

60 100.00<br />

References<br />

Bharati Joshi, Bhatti T.S, Bansal N.K, Energy Policy, Volume 17, Issue 9, September 1992,<br />

pp. 869-876.<br />

International Energy Agency (2011). https://www.iae.org<br />

T6-39P-1436<br />

Impact <strong>of</strong> NICRA Project Through Analysis <strong>of</strong> Different Success Point<br />

Rajiv Kumar*<br />

Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Palamu-822102, Birsa Agricultural University, Ranchi, Jharkhand<br />

*rjv123kmr@gmail.com<br />

Palamu KVK got NICRA (National Innovations on Climate Resilient Agriculture) project<br />

during 2010-11. Khagribari village under Palamu-2 Block selected purposively (KVK Adopted<br />

Village) for implementation <strong>of</strong> the NICRA project. Several activities were done during 2010-<br />

11 to 2020-21. Majority <strong>of</strong> the farmers <strong>of</strong> Khagrabari village were marginal farmer. Flood,<br />

irrigation, water conservation, diseases infestation on plant and occupational migration were<br />

the major problem <strong>of</strong> the village. Some innovative and progressive farmers were developed<br />

and exposed their activity through different programme. In our study we discuss about the few<br />

successes point <strong>of</strong> NICRA project in Palamu District. The objective <strong>of</strong> the study was to show<br />

the impact <strong>of</strong> NICRA project in Palamu District through analysis <strong>of</strong> different success point.<br />

Palamu is situated between 23 0 50’ and 24 0 80’N to 83 0 55’ to 85 0 30’E latitude and at an altitude<br />

<strong>of</strong> 222.00 m above from mean sea level. However, the normal rainfall in Plamau is 1257.8 mm.<br />

Total geographical area <strong>of</strong> the district is 524690 ha (5043. 85 km 2 ). Out <strong>of</strong> which nearly<br />

1,73,553 hectares comes under net cultivable land, 1,67,848 hectares is covered by forest and<br />

24,750 hectares comes under barren and non-cultivated land. Murma Dulsulma village under<br />

Satbarwa Block was selected purposively for implementation <strong>of</strong> NICRA project. Village was<br />

selected on the basis <strong>of</strong> climate vulnerability.<br />

Technology and impacts<br />

Solid waste management through composting: Organic matter always plays pivotal role in<br />

minimizing the effect <strong>of</strong> global warming by way <strong>of</strong> reducing fluctuation in diurnal temperature<br />

887 | Page Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

variation and also minimizing the maximum soil temperature. Further organic matter reduces<br />

the irrigation water requirement and thus reduces environmental pollution also. Considering<br />

this Palamu KVK took initiative to popularize the use <strong>of</strong> organic manure by promoting the<br />

technology <strong>of</strong> compost preparation Palamu Krishi Vigyan Kendra initiated demonstration<br />

programme for proper utilization <strong>of</strong> cow dung, rural farm waste, kitchen wastes, other locally<br />

available organic waste materials and organic residues through preparation <strong>of</strong> compost by<br />

NADEP method to cut down the shortage <strong>of</strong> availability <strong>of</strong> organic manures. Demonstration<br />

was also organized on low-cost preparation <strong>of</strong> compost by heap method. Awareness was also<br />

developed to improve the quality <strong>of</strong> cow dung manure with minimum interference.<br />

Impact: Laboratory analysis <strong>of</strong> samples collected indicated that quality <strong>of</strong> organic manures<br />

produced through NADEP or heap method was much better than that used by farmers <strong>of</strong> the<br />

village. It is also too noteworthy that use <strong>of</strong> organic manure has increased 143 ton from the<br />

Bench marks (when compared with status <strong>of</strong> organic manure use before inception <strong>of</strong> the project<br />

at the village). Bohita village was promoted organic manure production through composting<br />

under MGNREGA with technical support from Palamu Krishi Vigyan Kendra.<br />

Use <strong>of</strong> black polythene mulch in winter cucumber: Cucumber is pr<strong>of</strong>itable crop. This crop<br />

is primarily grown in the summer months. But farmers <strong>of</strong> this village prefer to grow this crop<br />

during rabi season as price <strong>of</strong> this crop remain high during winter months. Problem arises when<br />

winter temperature comes below 12 °C which not only affect physiological growth but also<br />

hampers fruit set and development <strong>of</strong> cucumber. Black polythene mulch was used to increase<br />

soil temperature thereby getting rid <strong>of</strong> the problems associated with low temperature.<br />

Comparative performance <strong>of</strong> technology: This technology performed well under stressful<br />

environment during winter and it out-yielded the traditional practice <strong>of</strong> growing cucumber<br />

without mulch. On an average, soil temperature under mulch was 1-1.5°C higher during day<br />

and 4.5-5 °C during night as compared to crop without mulch which increased fruiting period<br />

by 21 days, decreasing flower drop by 12% and advancement <strong>of</strong> fruiting 5 days under mulch.<br />

Black polythene mulching in cucumber resulted in an yield increase <strong>of</strong> 8.19% compared to<br />

local practice. The net returns and B:C ratio were Rs.108200 ha -1 and 2.6 in treatment compared<br />

to Rs.97700 ha -1 and 2.51 under local practice.<br />

Renovation <strong>of</strong> existing pond for harvesting, storing and recycling <strong>of</strong> rain water<br />

A large area <strong>of</strong> the NICRA adopted village remains uncultivated during rabi seasons as only<br />

10% <strong>of</strong> total cultivated area were irrigated using well by lifting ground water as well as canal<br />

water. Though there exist a number <strong>of</strong> small and large size ponds but most <strong>of</strong> them were<br />

seasonal and cannot be used as source <strong>of</strong> irrigation during critical stages <strong>of</strong> rabi crops. The<br />

NICRA village (Murma Dulsulma) <strong>of</strong> Palamu district experiences annual rainfall <strong>of</strong> about<br />

1257.8 mm received mostly during the period from July- September but most <strong>of</strong> the water<br />

Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts<br />

888 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

bodies <strong>of</strong> the village are 5-7 ft deep and remain dry from December onwards. Palamu KVK<br />

renovated 6 numbers <strong>of</strong> pond through NICRA project which increases 76830 cubic foot <strong>of</strong><br />

pond volume and as result additional 8.5 ha <strong>of</strong> land irrigated during rabi season. It was found<br />

from the demonstration that 16399 cubic feet water was saved due to use <strong>of</strong> rain water. The<br />

farmers <strong>of</strong> NICRA village were facing problems <strong>of</strong> irrigation in rabi season crops (Potato,<br />

wheat, mustard, brinjal, garlic, cabbage etc.) due to limited irrigation sources. More than 3 <strong>of</strong><br />

the pond owners <strong>of</strong> village were communicated to Palamu KVK for renovation <strong>of</strong> their water<br />

bodies to store the rain water and solve the problems <strong>of</strong> irrigation to rabi crops with special<br />

emphasis on vegetables during December to February.<br />

Brief about the technology: Tomato is a major cash crop <strong>of</strong> Palamu district. In the NICRA<br />

adopted village poor productivity <strong>of</strong> tomato crop (145.5 q ha -1 ) was a major concern for the<br />

farmers. In this region soil acidity and occurrence <strong>of</strong> bacterial wilt was the major factors<br />

triggering poor productivity. Swarn Naveen is a bacterial wilt tolerant variety was introduced<br />

by the KVK through NICRA project in the form <strong>of</strong> demonstration in kharif season resulted in<br />

an yield <strong>of</strong> 165 q ha -1 (13.75% increase in yield). Soil acidity, one <strong>of</strong> the major predisposing<br />

factors for the wilt pathogen, was corrected through liming. The variety performed well in<br />

stressful environment and it out-yielding the Swarn Naveen variety due to less incidence <strong>of</strong><br />

bacterial wilt pathogen. On an average, there was 13.75% increase in fruit yield with 18.4%<br />

reduction in wilt in demonstration plots against the untreated local checks.<br />

Economics <strong>of</strong> the technology<br />

Economics <strong>of</strong> demonstration (Rs. ha -1 ) Economics <strong>of</strong> Local (Rs. ha -1 )<br />

Gross<br />

Cost<br />

Gross<br />

Return<br />

Net<br />

Return<br />

BCR<br />

Gross<br />

Cost<br />

Gross<br />

Return<br />

Net<br />

Return<br />

59400 165000 105600 2.78 55900 145500 89600 2.60<br />

Conclusion<br />

It may conclude from the above study that NICRA project was a successful project in Palamu<br />

District. The major highlighting points <strong>of</strong> above study that horizontal impact <strong>of</strong> the Project and<br />

attachment with the different line department with this project. The project extended its impact<br />

through different farmers club, SHGs and district line department. KVK scientists perceived<br />

that the motivation and interest level <strong>of</strong> farmers <strong>of</strong> NICRA adopted Village on agriculture were<br />

high compared to other village (Distance more than 35 Km NICRA adopted Village, Palamu).<br />

The first and foremost objectives <strong>of</strong> the project which was perceived by scientist and farmer<br />

that adoption <strong>of</strong> new technology with changing <strong>of</strong> agro climatic, agro-ecology and<br />

demographic condition and ultimate aim to establish the resilience agriculture system.<br />

BCR<br />

889 | Page Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

T6-P40-1441<br />

Intercropping with Sugarcane for DFI in Eastern Uttar Pradesh<br />

Ashok Rai 1 , Shamsher Singh 1 , Ajay K. Rai 1 , Neeraj Singh 2 , Vishal Singh 1<br />

and Vinay Kr. Patel 1<br />

1<br />

Krishi Vigyan kendra (ICAR-IIVR) Sargatia Seorahi, Kushinagar (U.P.) -274406<br />

2 ICAR-IIVR Varanasi (U.P.)<br />

A series <strong>of</strong> experiments was undertaken to assess “Intercropping in sugarcane for DFI in eastern<br />

Uttar Pradesh” at Amawa Khas Nyay panchayat <strong>of</strong> district Kushinagar in eastern Uttar Pradesh<br />

during 2018 to 2020 under National Innovation in Climate Resilient Agriculture (NICRA)<br />

Project. The number <strong>of</strong> farming community members involved in this series <strong>of</strong> demonstration<br />

were 46 in 2018, 100 in 2019 and 118 in 2020. The Experimental results revealed that the gross<br />

monetary returns were higher in sugarcane + potato system as compared to other inter-cropping<br />

systems with sugarcane. Among the inter-cropping systems assessed, sugarcane with potato<br />

was the most remunerative in respect <strong>of</strong> average production/yield at 992.8 q/ha with an average<br />

net return <strong>of</strong> INR 275560.0 and BCR <strong>of</strong> 3.54. The average production <strong>of</strong> Sugarcane-Potato<br />

intercrop was 992.8 q/ ha (Sugarcane- 883.3q/ha and potato 109.5q/ha) as compared to<br />

Sugarcane - Mustard (Sugarcane- 840.7q/ha and Mustard 9.1q/ha), Sugarcane-Lentil<br />

(Sugarcane- 825.4 q/ha and lentil 4.5 q/ha) respectively.<br />

T6-P41-1451<br />

Agricultural Market Intelligence Centre - Forecasting <strong>of</strong> Redgram Prices<br />

in Telangana State by ARIMAX<br />

R. Vijaya Kumari, A. Sreenivas * , G. Ramakrishna and P. Venkatesh<br />

College <strong>of</strong> Agriculture, Pr<strong>of</strong>essor Jayashankar Telangana State Agricultural University, Hyderabad<br />

*akulasreenivas948@gmail.com<br />

The Agricultural Market Intelligence Centre established in PJTSAU with the financial support<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Marketing Department, Government <strong>of</strong> Telangana is developing and disseminating price<br />

forecasts <strong>of</strong> sixteen major agricultural commodities produced in Telangana State. Redgram is<br />

one <strong>of</strong> the major rainfed crops largely cultivated in the state. ARIMAX model has been applied<br />

to forecast redgram prices in Telangana State which includes time series data on rainfall as<br />

input exogenous variable. When an ARIMA model includes other time series as input variables,<br />

the model is referred to as an ARIMAX model. The autoregressive integrated moving average<br />

with exogenous variable (ARIMAX) model can take the impact <strong>of</strong> covariates on the forecasting<br />

into account, improving the comprehensiveness and accuracy <strong>of</strong> the prediction. The ARIMA<br />

and ARIMAX models were compared by setting different combinations <strong>of</strong> input data.<br />

Particularly, ARIMA includes only the monthly model prices, while ARIMAX includes the<br />

Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts<br />

890 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

monthly model prices and Rainfall data. Based on preliminary testing, ARIMAX (111) is found<br />

to be the best model for future projections <strong>of</strong> redgram prices in Telangana State. The analysis<br />

<strong>of</strong> 20 years monthly data from April 2002 to November 2022 predicted that redgram price per<br />

quintal may prevail around Rs. 6720-6980 in the next four months i.e., peak harvesting time<br />

period. The centre has predicted pre-sowing and pre-harvest price <strong>of</strong> redgram during kharif<br />

2021-22, previous season as Rs. 6000-6300 and Rs. 5800-6000 per quintal. The actual prices<br />

prevailed for redgram in major markets <strong>of</strong> Telangana during the peak harvesting time period<br />

<strong>of</strong> kharif 2021-22 was in the range <strong>of</strong> Rs. 5900-6300. It was observed that the actual prices<br />

were deviated only by -0.82% from pre-sowing price forecast and by 3.28% from the preharvest<br />

price forecast. These results clearly confirms the precision and reliability <strong>of</strong> price<br />

forecast information from the Agricultural Market Intelligence Centre, PJTSAU for making<br />

better production and marketing related decisions by the farmers and other stakeholders like<br />

traders and policy makers.<br />

6T-P42-1458<br />

Additional Income Through Cultivation <strong>of</strong> Redgram on Paddy Field Bunds<br />

S. Neelaveni 1 , P Venkatarao 2 , G.S.Roy 3 and D.Chinnamnaidu 3<br />

1 KVK, Amadalavalasa,<br />

2 DAATTC, Srikakulam,<br />

3 Agricultural College, Naira<br />

On farm trail was conducted on assessment <strong>of</strong> redgram varieties suitable for cultivation on paddy<br />

field bunds in different farming situation <strong>of</strong> 38 mandals across Srikakulam district <strong>of</strong> Andhra<br />

Pradesh. Lack <strong>of</strong> suitable variety was a constraint for cultivation <strong>of</strong> redgram on paddy field bunds<br />

in Srikakulam district, The new variety ICP 7035 has recorded higher yields than the farmer’s<br />

practice(LRG 45 and LRG 52). ICP 7035 was recorded 53% more yield than LRG-52. Farmers<br />

were realising additional income <strong>of</strong> rupees 11000/- from cultivation <strong>of</strong> redgram on per acre <strong>of</strong><br />

paddy field bunds.The new variety ICP 7035 duration wise 10 to 15 days early (140-145 days) than<br />

LRG-52(160 days) .The new variety ICP 7035 was recorded higher yield (53% higher than LRG-<br />

52) than the farmer’s practice. Variety availability in local area, was one <strong>of</strong> the constraints faced.<br />

The new variety ICP 7035 duration wise 10 to 15 days early (140-145 days) LRG-52(160 days)<br />

Yield wise more than LRG-52. Red gram variety ICP 7035 perfomed well when compared to<br />

LRG-52.<br />

891 | Page Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

T6-P43-1500<br />

Impact <strong>of</strong> Frontline Demonstrations on Yield <strong>of</strong> Wheat (Triticum aestivum)<br />

under NICRA Villages <strong>of</strong> District Jhansi U.P.<br />

Adesh Kumar, Nishi Roy, Md Ramjan Shekh, Vimal Raj Yadav and Atik Ahamad<br />

KVK, Jhansi (Banda University <strong>of</strong> Agriculture and Technology, Banda)<br />

kvkjhansi@gmail.com<br />

Wheat is the second most important food crop in India after rice. It is one <strong>of</strong> the most<br />

imperative and consumed principal foods at global level. Particularly the wheat species<br />

Triticum aestivum (L.) accounts for one-fifth <strong>of</strong> the total calories delivered to the world<br />

population (Reynolds et al., 2010). Wheat has a carbohydrate-rich composition, mainly in the<br />

form <strong>of</strong> starch, and has proteins, lipids, vitamins and minerals. It is grown in an area <strong>of</strong><br />

34.6 million hectares area with production 109.2 million tonnes and productivity <strong>of</strong> 4960<br />

kg/ha. The present study was carried out by Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Jhansi to know the yield<br />

gaps between improved package and practices under Front Line Demonstration (FLD) and<br />

farmer’s practice (FP) <strong>of</strong> wheat crop in NICRA villages under heat stress condition.<br />

Methodology<br />

During rabi 2022-221 and 2021-22, frontline demonstrations (FLD) were conducted on<br />

thermo-insensitive variety “Raj-4049” in 45.0 ha area for 112 beneficiaries/ farmers <strong>of</strong> Jhansi<br />

district by KVK, Jhansi (BUAT Banda). The demonstrations were conducted in 3 NICRA<br />

(National Innovation on Climate Resilient Agriculture Project) villages- Gandhinagar, Birgua<br />

and Babaltada in Badagaon block <strong>of</strong> Jhansi district. Among input, 40.0 kg seed <strong>of</strong> improved<br />

wheat variety Raj-4079 per acre per farmer were given in 10 clusters for 112 beneficiaries<br />

under FLD. Sowing <strong>of</strong> crop by farmers in ten clusters was done during second fortnight <strong>of</strong><br />

November, Rabi 2021 & 2022.<br />

Results<br />

The data on wheat yield indicated that the FLDs gave a good impact on the farming community<br />

<strong>of</strong> Jhansi district as they were motivated by the new agricultural technologies adopted in the<br />

demonstrations. Average wheat yield under front line demonstrations was 4350 kg/ha & 4250<br />

kg/ha during rabi 2021 and 2022 respectively. This were 42.62 and 33.46 % higher than<br />

farmer’s practices (Wheat var. Local).<br />

Conclusion<br />

Thermo-insensitive wheat variety “Raj-4049 had good yield potential under NICRA villages<br />

as compared to local cultivar. The yield <strong>of</strong> this variety was 42.62 and 33.46 % higher than local<br />

cultivar.<br />

Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts<br />

892 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

References<br />

Reynolds, M, D., Bonnett, S.C., Chapman, R.T., Furbank, Y Manès, D.E., Mather, 2018.<br />

Raising yield potential <strong>of</strong> wheat. I. Overview <strong>of</strong> a consortium approach and breeding strategies.<br />

J. Exp Botany 62: 439–452.<br />

T6-P44-1502<br />

Impact Assessment on Yield and Economics <strong>of</strong> Improved Varieties <strong>of</strong> Pea<br />

(Pisum sativum L.) through Technology Demonstration in NICRA Villages<br />

<strong>of</strong> Tehri Garhwal, Uttarakhand<br />

Aalok G. Yewale, Udit Joshi, Shikha, Naveen Tariyal and C. Tiwari<br />

Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Veer Chandra Singh Garhwali Uttarakhand University <strong>of</strong> Horticulture and<br />

Forestry Ranichauri, Tehri Garhwal 249199 (Uttarakhand)<br />

Pea (Pisum sativum L.) is an important nutritious leguminous cool season crop grown<br />

throughout the world mostly during cool seasons. Pea crop is a rich source <strong>of</strong> protein,<br />

carbohydrates, vitamin A, vitamin C, calcium, phosphorous and several amino acids (Pandey<br />

and Uniyal 2018). Pea crop can fetch very high returns in hilly regions <strong>of</strong> Uttarakhand if grown<br />

in prior seasons to plain regions. Also, the mid-hill conditions <strong>of</strong> Uttarakhand are ideally suited<br />

for <strong>of</strong>f-season cultivation <strong>of</strong> Pea. Hence, selection <strong>of</strong> a suitable and appropriate variety and<br />

season becomes very crucial in hilly regions for gaining high monetary returns and boosting<br />

farmer’s income (Tiwari et al. 2014). The low productivity <strong>of</strong> Pea crop is attributed towards<br />

several constraints like lack <strong>of</strong> quality and improved cultivars, lesser use <strong>of</strong> inputs and poor<br />

extension services delivered to the farmers (Tiwari et al. 2021). By keeping all these factors<br />

under consideration, several front-line demonstrations using improved cultivars <strong>of</strong> Pea crop<br />

were carried out in the NICRA villages Dabri and Kaleth from year 2019-20 to 2021-22 to<br />

enhance the productivity and economic returns per unit area in the farmer’s field.<br />

Methodology<br />

The present investigation was carried out in the NICRA villages i.e., Dabri and Kaleth under<br />

Thauldhar block <strong>of</strong> district Tehri Garhwal during 2019-20 to 2021-22 under Technology<br />

demonstration component (TDC) <strong>of</strong> project NICRA. The improved and high yielding varieties<br />

<strong>of</strong> Pea (Arkel and PSM-3) were used by KVK, Tehri Garhwal, Uttarakhand for carrying out<br />

front line demonstrations in fields <strong>of</strong> around 45 farmers in the NICRA villages to quantify the<br />

technology gap and extension gap between demonstration and farmer’s practice. Frequent<br />

visits as well as advisories were delivered to the farmers to implement the technology correctly.<br />

The data pertaining to yield under demonstration and farmer’s practice was collected by<br />

random crop harvesting methods and was analysed by using simple statistical tools. The<br />

extension gap, technology gap and technology index were calculated using the following<br />

893 | Page Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

formula: 1. Percent increase in yield = [(Yield under demonstration - Yield under Existing<br />

practices)/ Yield under Existing practices)] x 100 2. Technology gap = Potential yield - Yield<br />

under demonstration, 3. Extension gap = Yield under demonstration - Yield under Existing<br />

practices 4. Technology index = [(Potential yield - Yield under demonstration)/Potential yield)]<br />

x 100.<br />

Results<br />

The data pertaining to the yield, percent increase in yield, technology gap, extension gap and<br />

technological index is presented in Table 1 and data related to economic impact <strong>of</strong> improved<br />

varieties <strong>of</strong> Pea is tabulated in Table 2.<br />

Yield, Percent increase, Technology gap, Extension gap and Technological index<br />

The results obtained from the present study revealed that the average yield under demonstration<br />

(90 q/ha) was much higher than the existing/farmer’s practices (60.66 q/ha) and the average<br />

percent increase in the demonstration yield over the farmer’s practice was around 48.29%<br />

which might be due to the higher yield potential <strong>of</strong> the improved varieties used in the<br />

demonstration. The average technology gap observed was around 23.33 q/ha which might be<br />

due to the varied climatic conditions, difference in status <strong>of</strong> soil fertility and local farm<br />

management practices. The results were in accordance with the findings <strong>of</strong> Singh et al. 2019<br />

and Shikha et al. 2021 in the onion crop. The average extension gap was 29.33 q/ha which<br />

might be due to the lack <strong>of</strong> availability <strong>of</strong> high yielding varieties to the farmers and lesser<br />

scientific technologies followed in the cultivation practices. The average technology index was<br />

observed to be around 19.99% which might be due to the prevalence <strong>of</strong> frost damage, cold<br />

waves, several diseases and insect pest infestations.<br />

Economic analysis<br />

Cultivation <strong>of</strong> improved varieties <strong>of</strong> vegetable pea (Arkel and PSM-3) led to the higher average<br />

net returns i.e., 48618 Rs. / hectare as compared to the farmer’s practices (26146 Rs./hectare).<br />

While the average Benefit: Cost ratio was also observed higher in case <strong>of</strong> improved varieties<br />

i.e., 2.09 when compared to existing practices (1.68) which might be due to the higher yield<br />

potential <strong>of</strong> the demonstrated improved varieties <strong>of</strong> vegetable Pea.<br />

Conclusion<br />

The results obtained from the present study revealed that the demonstration <strong>of</strong> improved<br />

varieties <strong>of</strong> Pea produced significant positive results in terms <strong>of</strong> yield and economics <strong>of</strong> Pea<br />

crop. These positive results were obtained due to the timely technological and site-specific<br />

interventions provided to the farmers which ultimately lead to the increase yield and enhanced<br />

farm productivity. It was also observed that the higher returns can also be obtained by early/<strong>of</strong>fseason<br />

sowing and harvesting <strong>of</strong> Pea when there is unavailability <strong>of</strong> Pea from plains in the<br />

Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts<br />

894 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

market. Hence, from the present study it can be concluded that technological interventions by<br />

using improved varieties <strong>of</strong> Pea coupled with early and <strong>of</strong>f-season sowing can lead to its<br />

enhanced productivity and economics and these technologies and site-specific interventions<br />

are needed in order to improve farm productivity and pr<strong>of</strong>itability.<br />

Yield, Technology gap, Extension gap and Technological index <strong>of</strong> improved varieties <strong>of</strong><br />

Pea<br />

Year<br />

2019-<br />

20<br />

Arkel<br />

2020-<br />

21<br />

Arkel<br />

2021-<br />

22<br />

PSM-<br />

3<br />

Demo<br />

No.<br />

Area<br />

(ha)<br />

Average yield<br />

(q/ha)<br />

Demo<br />

Farmer’s<br />

practice<br />

Percent<br />

Increase<br />

(%)<br />

Technology<br />

gap (q/ha)<br />

Extension<br />

gap (q/ha)<br />

Technological<br />

index (%)<br />

45 1.75 85 60 41.66 35 25 29.16<br />

45 1.75 95 62 53.22 25 33 20.83<br />

45 1.75 90 60 50.00 10 30 10.00<br />

90 60.66 48.29 23.33 29.33 19.99<br />

Economic impact <strong>of</strong> improved varieties <strong>of</strong> Pea<br />

Year Gross cost (Rs./ha) Gross Income<br />

(Rs./ha)<br />

Demo<br />

Farmer’s<br />

practice<br />

Demo<br />

Farmer’s<br />

practice<br />

Net Return (Rs./ha)<br />

Demo<br />

Farmer’<br />

practice<br />

B:C Ratio<br />

Demo<br />

2019-20 45581 38260 93450 65964 47869 27704 2.05 1.72<br />

2020-21 46380 39270 93250 60857 46870 21587 2.01 1.54<br />

2021-22 47560 40458 99540 67687 51980 27229 2.09 1.67<br />

Average 44465 37697 93084 63844 48618 26146 2.09 1.68<br />

References<br />

Farmer’<br />

practice<br />

Pandey, P. and Uniyal, S.P. 2018. Characterization <strong>of</strong> vegetable pea genotypes under tarai<br />

regions <strong>of</strong> Uttarakhand-economic aspect. J. hill Agri. 9(1): 78-81.<br />

Tiwari, R., Bhatt, L. and Dev, R. 2014. Effect <strong>of</strong> date <strong>of</strong> sowing on growth and yield <strong>of</strong><br />

vegetable pea genotypes under rain-fed mid-hill conditions <strong>of</strong> Uttarakhand. Indian J. Horti.<br />

71(2): 288-291.<br />

Tiwari, C., Yewale, A.G., Tariyal, N., Kumar, A. and Shikha. 2021. Impact <strong>of</strong> technology<br />

demonstrations on yield and economics <strong>of</strong> Soybean (Glycine max L.) in NICRA villages <strong>of</strong><br />

895 | Page Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Tehri Garhwal, Uttarakhand. <strong>Extended</strong> Summaries: 5th International Agronomy Congress,<br />

November 23-27, 2021, India. 155-157pp.<br />

Singh, R., Dahiya, R. H. and Baghel, M. S. 2019. Impact assessment <strong>of</strong> rabi Onion variety<br />

Agrifound Light Red (AFLR) through OFTs in Sidhi District <strong>of</strong> Madhya Pradesh. Journal <strong>of</strong><br />

Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research. 6(5): 380-385.<br />

T6-P45-1541<br />

Impact <strong>of</strong> Weather based Agro-Advisory Services on Upliftment <strong>of</strong><br />

Farming Communities <strong>of</strong> Ramanathapuram District, Tamil Nadu<br />

M. Vengateswari, S. Vallal Kannan, P.Balasubramaniyan and K. Elanchezhyan<br />

Krishi vigyan kendra, Ramanathapuram<br />

ramnadkvk@tnau.ac.in<br />

Agromet Advisory Services (AAS) plays a vital role in Agriculture and allied activities by<br />

providing valuable information about all agricultural operations from land preparation to postharvesting<br />

operations with respect to prevailing weather conditions. About 66% <strong>of</strong> crop<br />

production is influenced by Agrometeorological factors. Accuracy-based forecasts will help<br />

farmers to overcome various types <strong>of</strong> losses in agriculture and allied activities (Praveen et al,<br />

2022). The main aim <strong>of</strong> AAS is to reduce the losses in agriculture and to increase the income<br />

level <strong>of</strong> farmers through accurate forecasts and the intervention <strong>of</strong> new technologies in<br />

agriculture. The farmers utilize the services <strong>of</strong> AAS to decide and follow the timely cultivation<br />

practices which in turn facilitated to obtain an increase in crop yield as well as reduced losses<br />

due to unfavorable situations. The present study was proposed to analyze the knowledge<br />

acquired and the level <strong>of</strong> impact <strong>of</strong> weather-based agro advisory services among the farmers<br />

on knowledge and productivity achievement.<br />

Methodology<br />

India Meteorological Department has taken up the Biweekly Agromet advisory service (AAS)<br />

based on medium-range forecasting to serve the farming community with important weather<br />

parameters like rainfall, temperature, wind speed and direction, cloud cover, and humidity.<br />

District AgroMet Unit, Ramanathapuram which is functional at Krishi Vigyan Kendra,<br />

Ramanathapuram is receiving the forecast since 2019 and issuing agro advisory bulletins<br />

through different media to assist the farmers. A random sample <strong>of</strong> 125 farmers was selected<br />

from different blocks <strong>of</strong> Ramanathapuram District for assessed the farmer´s knowledge and<br />

perception <strong>of</strong> agromet advisory services. Descriptive statistics was employed to find out the<br />

frequency and percentage <strong>of</strong> farmer on adoption <strong>of</strong> advisory on crop production and tabular<br />

analysis for impact study.<br />

Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts<br />

896 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Results<br />

Adoption<br />

The study indicates that AAS has provided timely service, 81 percent <strong>of</strong> the farmers are<br />

satisfied with making the decision on farming operations viz., sowing and weeding (36<br />

percent), chemical spray (84 percent), fertilizer application (57 percent) harvest and Post<br />

harvesting operations (71 percent) by the small and marginal farmers especially its economic<br />

value in terms <strong>of</strong> money by weather forecast leading to reduction in production cost, enhancing<br />

the efficacy <strong>of</strong> inputs such as fertilizer, pesticide and saving crop and its yield from weather<br />

hazards.<br />

Dissemination<br />

Mass Media have separate sections for agricultural information to the farming community.<br />

Hence mass media like television, radio, newspaper, and mobile are being effectively utilized<br />

by Krishi Vigyan Kendra to disseminate innovative adaptation and management technologies.<br />

In this regard, the survey results indicate that 70 percent <strong>of</strong> farmers get weather information<br />

through mobile (WhatsApp and SMS) followed by 13 percent through television, 12 through<br />

the newspaper, and 5 percent through radio (Fig. 1). Hence it is clearly indicating that,<br />

dissemination <strong>of</strong> weather advisories through mobile and television reached to both literate and<br />

illiterate farming communities for timely adoption <strong>of</strong> management technologies.<br />

The study revealed the perception <strong>of</strong> AAS revealed (Fig.2.) that majority <strong>of</strong> the farmers felt the<br />

importance <strong>of</strong> Agro meteorology advisory services (87 percent) and usefulness in adoption (85<br />

percent). Whereas, 70 percent <strong>of</strong> forecast accuracy and 82 percent <strong>of</strong> them felt that advisories<br />

based on predicted precipitation events are very effective and helpful for planning and<br />

execution <strong>of</strong> various farm operations.<br />

Conclusion<br />

Impact assessment is the analysis <strong>of</strong> the significant change that has occurred due to AAS<br />

intervention. By consistently delivering actionable weather information, analysis and decision<br />

support for farming situations such as farm and pest management through weather-based agro<br />

advisory services enhanced the knowledge and adoption <strong>of</strong> timely management technologies.<br />

References<br />

Praveen, K. M., Kamath, K. S., Lakshmana, R. K., & Shetty, S. 2022. Analyzing the impact <strong>of</strong><br />

weather-based agro-advisory services <strong>of</strong> GKMS project among areca nut growers <strong>of</strong><br />

Udupi district <strong>of</strong> Karnataka. Pharma innovation, SP-11(1): 07-11.<br />

897 | Page Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Farmers response on weather-based agro advisories<br />

S.No Questionnaire Farmers response<br />

1 Making decision on farm operation based on<br />

weather forecast<br />

2 Weather forecast and agro advisory on Sowing<br />

and weeding<br />

3 Weather forecast and agro advisory on<br />

insecticides pesticides/ fungicides<br />

4 Weather forecast and agro advisory on<br />

Application <strong>of</strong> fertilizer<br />

5 Weather forecast and agro advisory on<br />

harvesting and post-harvest operation<br />

6 Benefit from abnormal weather forecast<br />

advisories related to animal husbandry<br />

Frequency<br />

102 81<br />

46 36<br />

105 84<br />

72 57<br />

89 71<br />

36 29<br />

Percent (%) <strong>of</strong> adoption<br />

Transfer <strong>of</strong> AAS information<br />

Perception <strong>of</strong> AAS<br />

Importance <strong>of</strong> Solar Light Trap in Integrated Pest Management<br />

T6-P46-1556<br />

Manoj Kumar Ahirwar, Dheeraj Singh*, Aishwarya Dudi and Chandan Kumar<br />

ICAR-CAZRI Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Pali, Rajasthan-306401, India<br />

*dheerajthakurala@yahoo.com<br />

The quality and safety <strong>of</strong> agricultural products are a major concern for the entire world. The<br />

focus is controlling pesticide residue, which is especially difficult in most crops. The solution<br />

to this problem lies in the biological control <strong>of</strong> insect pests at the economic level. The solar<br />

light trap may be considered as the alternate solution that has several advantages over the<br />

Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts<br />

898 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

electrical light trap. There are several models and designs <strong>of</strong> solar light traps available in the<br />

markets that do not depend on any other source like electricity, fuel, wind power, or mechanical<br />

power. This device operates automatically i.e. turns on at 6 pm and turns <strong>of</strong>f before sunrise i.e.<br />

6 am. Most <strong>of</strong> the damage-causing insects are active during this time. Installing one light trap<br />

in an acre area attracts at least more than 1000 adult pests for a day. Nocturnal insects are <strong>of</strong>ten<br />

attracted to light sources that emit large amounts <strong>of</strong> UV radiation and devices that exploit this<br />

behavior. Thus, solar light trap provides a scientific basis for ecological control <strong>of</strong> pests in crop<br />

production reducing the volume <strong>of</strong> pesticides and resulting in the protection <strong>of</strong> the<br />

agroecological environment.<br />

T6-P47-1560<br />

Impact <strong>of</strong> Residual Soil Moisture on Yields and Pr<strong>of</strong>itability <strong>of</strong> Rainfed<br />

Cropping Sequences<br />

M.L. Jadav*, Narendra Kumawat, D.V. Bhagat, S.K. Choudhary, K.S. Bangar and<br />

Bharat Singh<br />

All India Coordinated Research Project for Dryland Farming, College <strong>of</strong> Agriculture (RVSKVV)<br />

Indore – 452 001, Madhya Pradesh, India<br />

*mjadavujn@gmail.com<br />

In agriculture, the availability <strong>of</strong> soil moisture determines the success <strong>of</strong> crop production<br />

because the growth and productivity <strong>of</strong> crops highly depend on sufficient moisture. Residual<br />

soil moisture can play important role in rabi crops. The medium to deep vertisols in the Malwa<br />

region can sustain sequential cropping with the short duration crops for about 220 days during<br />

the normal monsoon season. If heavy rainfall occurred, Kharif crops are badly affected but rabi<br />

crop production can compensate it, because <strong>of</strong> residual moisture content in rainfed conditions.<br />

Lack <strong>of</strong> adequate seed-zone moisture is a major problem in the timely sowing <strong>of</strong> rabi crops<br />

after kharif in rainfed areas.<br />

Methodology<br />

Field experiments were conducted during 2019-20 and 2020-21 at the AICRP for Dryland<br />

Agriculture, College <strong>of</strong> Agriculture (RVSKVV), Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India to find out the<br />

effect <strong>of</strong> residual soil moisture on rainfed cropping sequences in vertisols. Nine cropping<br />

sequences including soybean/maize/black gram-based cropping systems, viz., soybeanchickpea,<br />

soybean-chickpea (kabuli) soybean-safflower, maize-chickpea, maize-chickpea<br />

(kabuli), maize-safflower, blackgram-chickpea, blackgram-chickpea (kabuli) and blackgramsafflower<br />

were tested in randomized block design with 5 replications. The soil moisture content<br />

(%) was determined by gravimetric method from two depths viz., topsoil (0-15 cm) and subsoil<br />

(15-30 cm) at 20, 40, 60, and 80 DAS and at harvest. This study was conducted to evaluate the<br />

effect <strong>of</strong> residual soil moisture on yield and monetary return in rainfed cropping sequences.<br />

899 | Page Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

The yield data <strong>of</strong> sequentially grown crops were recorded and statistically analyzed in terms <strong>of</strong><br />

soybean equivalent yield (SEY) to calculate system productivity.<br />

Results<br />

The data presented in Table 1 revealed that significantly higher SEY (3504 kg/ha) was recorded<br />

by the sequence soybean -chickpea with the highest total net return <strong>of</strong> Rs. 104142/ha with a B:<br />

C ratio <strong>of</strong> 3.89 followed by blackgram-chickpea (SEY 2945 kg/ha total net return Rs. 81815/ha<br />

and B: C ratio <strong>of</strong> 3.27). Whereas, the lowest SEY (1138 kg/ha), total net return (Rs. 9510/ha),<br />

and B: C ratio (1.26) were found under the maize-safflower sequence. During the initial period<br />

<strong>of</strong> crop growth, soil moisture content was higher in the upper depth but at later stages, soil<br />

moisture content was found higher in the lower depth <strong>of</strong> the soil. It can be concluded that<br />

residual soil moisture availability can affect the yield and economics <strong>of</strong> rabi crops after Kharif<br />

season under rainfed conditions.<br />

Mean data <strong>of</strong> yield, soybean equivalent yield (SEY), total net returns and B: C ratio <strong>of</strong><br />

different crop sequences<br />

Crop<br />

sequence<br />

Yield<br />

(kg/ha)<br />

Cost <strong>of</strong><br />

cultivation<br />

(Rs./ha)<br />

SEY<br />

(kg/ha)<br />

Total return <strong>of</strong><br />

sequence (Rs./ha)<br />

Seed Straw Gross Net<br />

Soybean - 986 1403 20000 - - -<br />

Total<br />

B: C<br />

ratio<br />

Chickpea 2250 3375 16000 3504 140142 104142 3.89<br />

Chickpea<br />

(Kabuli)<br />

1313 3688 16000 2449 97955 61955 2.72<br />

Safflower 688 2125 16000 1832 73267 37267 2.04<br />

Maize - 695 2222 20000 - - - -<br />

Chickpea 2188 3438 16000 2817 112698 76698 3.13<br />

Chickpea<br />

(Kabuli)<br />

1063 3125 16000 1552 62073 26073 1.72<br />

Safflower 625 1750 16000 1138 45510 9510 1.26<br />

Black gram<br />

-<br />

417 833 20000 - - - -<br />

Chickpea 2063 2938 16000 2945 117815 81815 3.27<br />

Chickpea<br />

(Kabuli)<br />

1063 2875 16000 1820 72815 36815 2.02<br />

Safflower 750 2375 16000 1563 62502 26502 1.74<br />

S Em (±) - - - 427 - - -<br />

C D at 5 % - - - 1237 - - -<br />

Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts<br />

900 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

T6-P48-1623<br />

Technology Need Assessment <strong>of</strong> Cool Season Vegetable Growers in Kerala<br />

Alaka S. Balan * , N.E. Safiya, V.P. Indhulekha, Deepa Surendran, M.R. Ashitha and<br />

C.V. Deepa Rani<br />

KVK Wayanad,<br />

*alakaextn@gmail.com<br />

Cool season vegetable cultivation is gaining popularity in the recent years in Kerala due to the<br />

advent <strong>of</strong> tropical varieties. The current level <strong>of</strong> production <strong>of</strong> cool season vegetables is low<br />

despite immense potential for boosting its production. The productivity is low due to the reason<br />

that the farmers have not fully adopted the improved package <strong>of</strong> practices <strong>of</strong> the cool season<br />

vegetable production technology and it is mainly grown by using traditional farming practices<br />

just like other vegetables. There is a need for the full adoption <strong>of</strong> recommended cultivation<br />

practices <strong>of</strong> cool season vegetable crops by the farmers, so that the production and income level<br />

can be raised. Therefore, it is necessary to know various aspects like adoption level, technology<br />

need, and constraints responsible for non-adoption <strong>of</strong> recommended cultivation practices <strong>of</strong><br />

cool season vegetable crops by the farmers. Evolving new technology is an endeavour in the<br />

direction <strong>of</strong> increasing production efficiency. The rapid technology progress and the increased<br />

rate <strong>of</strong> outdated technologies necessitate technology forecasting for any planning progress<br />

specially to understand technology needs <strong>of</strong> cool season vegetable growers. Even non-farmers<br />

are getting attracted to growing these vegetables in homesteads and government is taking<br />

initiatives to encourage, promote and support such actions. When compared to other<br />

vegetables, cool season vegetables generate higher returns in shorter duration as the pest and<br />

disease are not so prevalent in the newly cultivated areas. Different institutions have developed<br />

technologies and disseminated the same for various crops. However, farmers have adopted the<br />

same in a differential manner owing to multifaceted factors.<br />

The present study entitled “Technology need assessment <strong>of</strong> cool season vegetable growers”<br />

was conducted in Thavinhal Grama panchayath <strong>of</strong> Wayanad district. The study aims to identify<br />

the technology needs <strong>of</strong> farmers, technology adoption for cool season vegetables and the<br />

constraints faced during cultivation <strong>of</strong> cool season vegetables.<br />

Methodology<br />

The sample size consisted <strong>of</strong> 90 cool season vegetable growers and 30 extension pr<strong>of</strong>essionals.<br />

Thus, a total <strong>of</strong> 120 respondents were selected using simple random sampling technique. An<br />

ex-post facto research design was used for the study. A well-structured interview schedule was<br />

employed for data collection from the respondents. Component wise distribution <strong>of</strong> growers<br />

based on extent <strong>of</strong> knowledge <strong>of</strong> cool season vegetable technology in the order <strong>of</strong> increasing<br />

nature was seedling treatment followed by fertilizer management, post-harvest technology,<br />

901 | Page Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

sowing technique, plant protection measures, irrigation management and pre-sowing<br />

technique. Technology adoption <strong>of</strong> selected cool season vegetable practices <strong>of</strong> KAU by farmers<br />

in Idukki and Wayanad district was assessed using the formula developed by Singh and Singh<br />

(1967). The variables were studied and analyzed with the help <strong>of</strong> different statistical tools like<br />

mean, correlation, frequency percentage analysis, Kruskal Wallis test.<br />

Results<br />

On analyzing the data, adoption <strong>of</strong> components such as pre-sowing technique, fertilizer<br />

management and post-harvest technology were found to be higher in Wayanad district. This<br />

agrees with the findings <strong>of</strong> Malla (2018) and Kant (2019).<br />

The results <strong>of</strong> the adoption quotient revealed that majority <strong>of</strong> the farmers i.e., 48.89 per cent<br />

belonged to medium category <strong>of</strong> adoption, followed by 42.22 per cent and 8.89 per cent in low<br />

and high category respectively. The mean adoption quotient (AQ) was 218.53 with a maximum<br />

and minimum adoption quotient <strong>of</strong> 323 and 123 respectively.<br />

Generalizing the results, it was interesting to note that the highest need for technology (or the<br />

low technology availability) was reported for processing, storage and value addition for cool<br />

season vegetables unlike the perceived traditional requirements. Tones <strong>of</strong> produce are wasted<br />

at the field level itself due to lower market price, climatic variations, and perishability and<br />

perhaps due to lack <strong>of</strong> storage facilities. This is in line with the findings <strong>of</strong> Thomas (2015) and<br />

Basheer (2016).<br />

The major constraints faced by cool season vegetable growers were lack <strong>of</strong> flower<br />

setting/incomplete flower setting/discoloring/undesired shape <strong>of</strong> flower due to varying climatic<br />

conditions, followed by lack <strong>of</strong> knowledge <strong>of</strong> disease resistant varieties and lack <strong>of</strong> knowledge<br />

about post-harvest technologies.<br />

Conclusion<br />

From the above findings the following conclusions can be drawn in general that majority <strong>of</strong> the<br />

cool season vegetable growers had medium level <strong>of</strong> adoption <strong>of</strong> cool season vegetable<br />

cultivation technology. Technology needs for post-harvest handling as well as value addition<br />

is demanded by the growers. From the results obtained it can be observed that there is<br />

considerable room for improvement in production and marketing and for scaling up the<br />

production through suitable extension interventions. Tailor made strategies tare to be lined up<br />

inorder to enhance the adoption <strong>of</strong> cool season vegetable growers towards taking up agriculture<br />

as a pr<strong>of</strong>itable farming enterprise.<br />

Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts<br />

902 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

References<br />

Basheer, N. 2016. Technology Utilization <strong>of</strong> Bitter gourd in Thiruvananthapuram district.<br />

M.Sc. (Ag) thesis, Kerala Agricultural University, 272p.<br />

Kant, U. 2019. Technology gap in adoption <strong>of</strong> cauliflower and cabbage production technology<br />

in Patna district. M.Sc. (Ag) thesis, Dr. Rajendra Prasad Central Agricultural University, Pusa,<br />

104p.<br />

Malla, A.K. 2018. A study on the extent <strong>of</strong> adoption on the vegetable production technology<br />

<strong>of</strong> KVK trained vegetable growers. Int. J. Educ. Sci. Res. 8(5): 1-6.<br />

Singh, K., M.P. and Singh, R. 1967. Ginger cultivation in Himachal Pradesh. Indian FMG<br />

30(11): 25-26.<br />

Thomas, A. and Kumar, N. K. 2015. Technology Need Assesment in the Homegarden Systems.<br />

J. Ext. Educ. 27(4): 5556-5563.<br />

T6-49 P<br />

Realizing Better Yield and returns <strong>of</strong> Chickpea crop through Cluster<br />

Frontline Demonstrations<br />

Ramesh Kumar, P.P. Rohilla, Narender Singh, Ashish Shivran, Poonam and<br />

Ashok Dhillon<br />

Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Mahendergarh<br />

CCS Haryana Agricultural University Hisar<br />

ICAR- Agricultural Technology Application Research Institute (ATARI), Jodhpur<br />

Chickpea is main rabi season crop grown in Mahendergarh district <strong>of</strong> Haryana state. The crop<br />

is cultivated in 8.2 thousand ha in the district. Productivity <strong>of</strong> the crop (1249 kg/ ha) is though<br />

better than state and national level yet it is very low than average yield (2500 kg/ ha) <strong>of</strong><br />

improved varieties recommended by various institutes. Gap between farmers’ practices and<br />

improved practices is one <strong>of</strong> the main reasons <strong>of</strong> low productivity. Therefore, to minimize this<br />

gap to increase productivity <strong>of</strong> chickpea crop at farmers’ fields. Demonstrations <strong>of</strong> improved<br />

technologies with integrated crop management approach at farmers’ fields through cluster<br />

frontline demonstrations is one <strong>of</strong> the ways to increase the productivity <strong>of</strong> the crop.<br />

Methodology<br />

Cluster frontline demonstration on chickpea crop were conducted during 2017-2022 at farmers’<br />

fields in Mahendergarh district <strong>of</strong> Haryana state under National Food Security Mission<br />

(NFSM) programme. Important and necessary process – selection <strong>of</strong> villages and farmers,<br />

identification <strong>of</strong> farming situation, analysis <strong>of</strong> soil samples, assessment <strong>of</strong> gaps between<br />

903 | Page Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

farmers’ practices and improved practices, identification <strong>of</strong> technologies to be demonstrated,<br />

rationalization <strong>of</strong> critical inputs, training programmes, regular monitoring visits, organizing<br />

field days, reporting <strong>of</strong> successful cases etc. was carried in an effective manner. Emphasis was<br />

laid to demonstrate those technologies for which maximum gap was observed. The<br />

technologies which were demonstrated included improved varieties (GNG-1581/1958, CSJ-<br />

515), optimum seed rate, seed treatment with chlorpyriphos, carbendazim and inoculation with<br />

rhizotika and PSB, use <strong>of</strong> fertilizers in balanced doses, proper weed management practices,<br />

management <strong>of</strong> pod borer etc. The critical inputs used by the centre were – quality seed <strong>of</strong><br />

improved varieties suitable for specific farming situation, chlorpyriphos and carbendazim,<br />

bi<strong>of</strong>ertilizers (rhizotika and PSB), insecticide novaluron. NPK fertilizers and other inputs were<br />

used by the partner farmers. Financial support for purchase <strong>of</strong> critical inputs were provided by<br />

Indian Council <strong>of</strong> Agricultural Research (ICAR) - Agricultural Technology Application<br />

Research Institute (ATARI). Observation on yield and other parameters were recorded and<br />

compared with farmers’ practice. Economics <strong>of</strong> demonstration plots and local check plots<br />

(farmers’ practice) was calculated to compare the relative performance.<br />

Results<br />

Adoption <strong>of</strong> improved practices in demonstration plots provided better yield and returns than<br />

those obtained under farmers practices. Average yield <strong>of</strong> five years in demonstration plots was<br />

19.17 q/ha which was 19.5 percent higher than Average yield <strong>of</strong> local check plots (16.04 q/ha).<br />

Better yield thus obtained in demonstration plots resulted into better net returns. Average<br />

additional net returns <strong>of</strong> ₹12445/ha were obtained in demonstration plots with av. additional<br />

cost <strong>of</strong> cultivation <strong>of</strong> ₹2320/ha resulting into higher benefit cost ratio.<br />

Conclusion<br />

Better yield and returns in demonstration plots indicate that there is possibility <strong>of</strong> minimizing<br />

extension gap by conducting cluster frontline demonstrations at farmers’ fields with integrated<br />

management approach.<br />

T6-50P-1146<br />

Achieving Fodder Self-sufficiency using Natural Farming Methods and Community<br />

Action in a Rainfed Region: The Case <strong>of</strong> Ayyavaripalli Village, India<br />

U. Sudhakar, M. Ramesh Kumar, V. Swaran and Bindu Mohanty<br />

Watershed Support Services and Activities Network (WASSAN), Hyderabad - 500068, Telangana<br />

Livestock and animal husbandry are integral parts <strong>of</strong> rainfed agriculture in India as they have<br />

multiple roles like source <strong>of</strong> income, draught power and in times <strong>of</strong> distress a source <strong>of</strong><br />

liquidity. About 70 to 90 percent <strong>of</strong> the ruminant livestock in India is estimated to be in the<br />

rainfed mixed farms (NRAA 2022) Scarcity <strong>of</strong> feed and fodder is identified as a major<br />

Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts<br />

904 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

impediment in the way <strong>of</strong> sustainable livestock development in the rainfed areas (Misra et.al<br />

2010). Deficiency <strong>of</strong> green fodder and dry fodder have been a recurring problem that the<br />

Working Group on Animal Husbandry and Dairying for the 10 th Five Year Plan has projected<br />

a deficiency 64% and 25% <strong>of</strong> each fodder respectively in the year 2025 (Planning Commission<br />

2002). Mitigating scarcity <strong>of</strong> dry fodder and managing availability <strong>of</strong> green fodder round the<br />

year to keep the livestock healthy and productive are serious challenges faced by the livestock<br />

keepers as majority <strong>of</strong> them are marginal and small landholders. This case study from the<br />

Ayyavaripalli village in the Valmikipuram/Vayalapadu Mandal <strong>of</strong> Annamayya district (part <strong>of</strong><br />

the erstwhile Chittoor district till March 2022) <strong>of</strong> Andhra Pradesh shows how the precarity <strong>of</strong><br />

livestock rearing under rainfed conditions can be reduced by sustainable solutions through<br />

fodder budgeting exercise with concerted participation <strong>of</strong> the community.<br />

Methodology<br />

An incremental, multi-year, multi-pronged, multi-species fodder development intervention was<br />

implemented in the Ayyavaripalli village and later in its nearby villages since 2018, when the<br />

annual rainfall in the village went down to 292 mm with a 54% deficit. The village <strong>of</strong> 129<br />

families with all families having milch animals, totalling 735 in 2018, has a local economy<br />

centred around dairying. The drought year <strong>of</strong> 2018 resulted in fodder scarcity that was<br />

accentuated by a shift from multi-cropping system to groundnut monocrop, which had reduced<br />

yield that year, as well as meagre economic returns from millets and pulses cultivation.<br />

Ayyavaripalli faced a deficit <strong>of</strong> around 269 tons in 2018 after accounting 370 tons <strong>of</strong> fodder<br />

from existing crops and 150 tons from other sources like commons and fallows. The deficit<br />

was met by procuring fodder from elsewhere at a cost <strong>of</strong> INR 2.9 million.<br />

Watershed Support Services and Activities Network (WASSAN), have prior experience <strong>of</strong><br />

implementing activities under the Andhra Pradesh Community managed Natural Farming<br />

(APCNF) in the region consulted with the villagers and formulated various interventions to<br />

address the fodder gap beginning from the Rabi season <strong>of</strong> 2018. Following practices were<br />

implemented for fodder cultivation; 1) Promotion <strong>of</strong> fodder development in irrigated and<br />

fallow lands <strong>of</strong> individuals; 2) Promotion <strong>of</strong> fodder development through seed dibbling in<br />

common land; 3) Promotion <strong>of</strong> fodder development in leased fallow lands; 4) Promotion <strong>of</strong><br />

millets and pulses cultivation for "Dhaana" (feed mix) preparation; and 5) Promotion <strong>of</strong> fodder<br />

plants on field bunds. Seeds <strong>of</strong> sorghum, pearl millet, field beans, horse gram and Cowpea were<br />

given to farmers for fodder crop combination.<br />

Results<br />

Out <strong>of</strong> the five interventions, three could provide desired results in terms <strong>of</strong> fodder production.<br />

Cultivation <strong>of</strong> fodder in individual cultivating lands, fallows and lands taken on lease gave<br />

encouraging results. About 318 tons <strong>of</strong> fodder was produced in Ayyavaripalli during Kharif<br />

905 | Page Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

2021. Improved availability <strong>of</strong> fodder has led to an increase in the number <strong>of</strong> cows and sheep<br />

in the village from 256 to 430 and about 600 to about 1000 respectively between 2018 and<br />

2021. The dairy economy <strong>of</strong> the village also benefited from an increased collection from 175-<br />

200 litres/day to nearly 1000 litres/day during the same time. Consequently, the milk collection<br />

centres have increased from 1 to 5. Besides Ayyavaripalli, four more clusters totalling 32<br />

villages were part <strong>of</strong> the programme and altogether 595 farmers cultivated fodder in 622 acres<br />

<strong>of</strong> land. Importantly 195 farmers have taken up the activity on their own without the programme<br />

support. The fodder development activities were primarily intended to benefit the landless<br />

families with livestock. Formation <strong>of</strong> Common Interest Groups by these families has helped in<br />

sharing the costs to take land under lease.<br />

Conclusion<br />

Mediation among community members to share resources – land, labour and material like<br />

dung, making the crisis and options visible through ‘Fodder Budgeting’, facilitating negotiated<br />

solutions, intensive support for people during initial fodder experiments to see the results on<br />

ground and natural farming methods with low input costs and high returns can help<br />

communities to move from deficits to surplus. These are the lessons emerging from the<br />

Ayyavaripalli experience and the later spread <strong>of</strong> the model into several other villages.<br />

The case study demonstrated a strategic mainstream option for enabling increased access to<br />

fallow lands in the villages to livestock farmers under negotiated agreements. Access to<br />

irrigation in such lands could further improve the productivity. The natural farming methods<br />

<strong>of</strong> production – using Ghana/Drava Jeevamrutam, pre-monsoon dry sowing with mulch,<br />

livestock penning, using multi-species crop mix – with a mix <strong>of</strong> cereals, millets, pulses for<br />

balanced nutrition aided by access to life saving irrigation can be included in the package <strong>of</strong><br />

practices. Investments in such initiatives have high cost-benefit ratios <strong>of</strong> around 1:4; and much<br />

higher social cost-benefit ratios especially in drought prone rainfed areas.<br />

References<br />

Misra, A.K, Rama Rao, C.A, and Ravishankar, K., 2010. Analysis <strong>of</strong> potentials and problems<br />

<strong>of</strong> dairy production in rainfed agro-ecosystem <strong>of</strong> India. Ind. J. Animal Sci. 80, (11):1126.<br />

NRAA (National Rainfed Area Authority). 2022. Accelerating the Growth <strong>of</strong> Rainfed<br />

Agriculture - Integrated Farmers Livelihood Approach. Ministry <strong>of</strong> Agriculture & Farmers’<br />

Welfare. p.6<br />

Planning Commission. 2002. Report <strong>of</strong> the Working Group on Animal Husbandry and Dairying<br />

for the Tenth Five Year Plan. Planning Commission, Government <strong>of</strong> India. Available at:<br />

https://niti.gov.in/planningcommission.gov.in/docs/aboutus/committee/wrkgrp/wg_anhbndry.<br />

pdf [Accessed on 15 September 2022]<br />

Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts<br />

906 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

T6-51P-1277<br />

Enhancement <strong>of</strong> Yield and Economic Indices by the Adoption <strong>of</strong> Cotton+ Redgram<br />

Intercropping System under Rainfed Conditions <strong>of</strong> Mancherial District, Telangana<br />

State<br />

I. Thirupathi, M. Rajshwar Naik, K. Shivakrishna, A. Nagaraju, U. Sravanthi, and<br />

B. Sathish Kumar<br />

Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Bellampalli, Mancherial (Dist.) – 504 251<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>essor Jayashankar Telangana State Agricultural University, Telangana State<br />

Cotton is an important fibre and commercial crop in India as well as in the Telangana state.<br />

The crop is grown on diverse soils, varying from fine-textured black soils to coarse-textured<br />

red soils. About two-thirds <strong>of</strong> the cotton area in the Mancherial district is under rainfed<br />

conditions and faces different abiotic stresses during the crop growth period resulting in lesser<br />

yields and an increase in input costs, ultimately reducing the cost-benefit ratio. Under such<br />

circumstances, intercropping cotton with other crops provides an additional return, improves<br />

soil quality (if legume is included as intercrop), reduces climatic risks and chance <strong>of</strong> crop<br />

failure, enhances biodiversity, and ensures a greater use <strong>of</strong> resources (Maitra and Ray, 2019).<br />

As a widely spaced crop, cotton provides ample scope for the adoption <strong>of</strong> the intercropping<br />

system. Pigeonpea is suitable for inter-cropping with different crops like cotton, sorghum, pearl<br />

millet, green gram, blackgram, maize, soybean, and groundnut for increasing production and<br />

maintaining soil fertility. Pigeonpea has more advantages when it is grown under the<br />

intercropped situation. Keeping in view, redgram inter-cropped with cotton is evolved as an<br />

alternative sustainable cropping system to sole cotton in rainfed conditions to improve the<br />

yields and income <strong>of</strong> the farmers in the Mancherial district <strong>of</strong> Telangana state.<br />

Methodology<br />

Demonstration on Cotton +Redgram intercropping system under rainfed conditions was<br />

conducted as Front-line Demonstration by Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Bellampalli, Mancherial<br />

district in different locations <strong>of</strong> Mancherial district during the year 2019-20, 2020-21 and 2021-<br />

22. An area <strong>of</strong> 0.4 ha per location was chosen for study. Test varieties were selected WRG-65<br />

and WRG-97 for Redgram varieties and the quality seed were distributed to the selected<br />

farmers. Sole cotton cultivation with Bt hybrid (farmer’s practice) was compared as a control.<br />

Sowings <strong>of</strong> crops in both treatments were done during 1 st fortnight <strong>of</strong> July during the three<br />

years. Intercropping <strong>of</strong> Cotton and Redgram was sown in a 6:1 ratio at a spacing <strong>of</strong> 90 x 60 cm<br />

for the row to row and plant to plant for both cotton and redgram respectively. The crop was<br />

grown under rainfed conditions only. The data on Plant population, cotton, and redgram yields<br />

were collected by random crop cutting method.<br />

907 | Page Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Results<br />

Average Yield, Equivalent Yield, and LER <strong>of</strong> cotton+ redgram intercropping system<br />

during 2019-20, 2020-21 and 2021-22<br />

Year Yield (kg/ha) Cotton<br />

equivalent<br />

ratio<br />

Cotton<br />

(Demo)<br />

+Redgram<br />

Sole Cotton<br />

(Check)<br />

Demo<br />

Check<br />

%<br />

increase<br />

in yield<br />

over<br />

check<br />

2019-20 1678 422 1791 2083 1791 14.0 1.34<br />

2020-21 1485 522 1696 2091 1696 18.8 1.30<br />

2021-22 1447 539 1583 1804 1583 12.2 1.26<br />

Mean 1537 494 1690 1993 1690 15.0 1.30<br />

Land<br />

equivalent<br />

ratio<br />

(LER)<br />

In the cropping system/intercropping system the yield <strong>of</strong> the system can be represented in<br />

equivalent yields <strong>of</strong> the main crop. The highest cotton equivalent yields recorded with cotton+<br />

redgram intercropping system compared to sole cotton during the three years. The average<br />

cotton equivalent yield was 2083 kg/ha, 2091kg/ha, and 1804 kg/ha respectively during 2019-<br />

20, 2020-21, and 2021-22 and the mean cotton equivalent yield was 1993 kg/ha. The CEY is<br />

less during the year 2021-22 due to the high market price <strong>of</strong> cotton kapas compared to other<br />

years. The average increase in the yield <strong>of</strong> the demo were 14 %, 18.8 % and 12.2 % over the<br />

check (sole cotton) and the mean increase <strong>of</strong> the yield <strong>of</strong> the demo is 15 % over the check.<br />

Blaise et al., 2005 found that cotton +redgram intercropping was one <strong>of</strong> the effective crop<br />

combinations where mean cotton equivalent yield was recorded high over sole cotton. The<br />

average Land equivalent ratio (LER) is 1.34, 1.30, and 1.20 during 2019-20, 2020-21, and<br />

2021-22 respectively and the mean LER value is 1.30. The LER denotes the benefits <strong>of</strong> an<br />

intercropping system to utilize the resources as against their pure stands. In all the years the<br />

LER values are greater than one which means the cotton + redgram intercropping system is<br />

advantageous. Similar findings were noticed by Oda et al., (2007).<br />

Average Economic indices and per day net returns <strong>of</strong> demo and check during 2019-20,<br />

2020-21, and 2021-22<br />

Cost<br />

cultivation<br />

(Rs/ha)<br />

<strong>of</strong><br />

Gross returns<br />

(Rs/ha)<br />

Net returns<br />

(Rs/ha)<br />

B:C ratio<br />

Per day net<br />

returns<br />

(Rs/ha)<br />

Demo Check Demo Check Demo Check Demo Check Demo Check<br />

2019-20 50250 52325 109610 94034 59306 41709 2.17 1.19 329 232<br />

2020-21 49799 51848 100733 82256 50934 33408 2.02 1.69 283 186<br />

2021-22 51804 52614 140865 118725 89061 66111 2.72 2.26 495 367<br />

Mean 50618 52262 117069 98338 66434 47076 2.30 1.71 369 262<br />

Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts<br />

908 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

The mean cost <strong>of</strong> cultivation is 50618 Rs/ha and 52262 Rs/ha for demo and check respectively.<br />

The mean gross returns are Rs.117069 and Rs. 98338 and net returns are Rs.66434 and Rs.<br />

47076 in the demo and check respectively. Similar findings were also reported by Oad et<br />

al.,2007 and reported that under rainfed conditions cotton + redgram intercropping system has<br />

shown positive combinations for better growth and yield contributing parameters and costbenefit<br />

ratio over the sole cotton crop. The mean benefit-cost ratio was 2.30: 1 and 1.71: 1 for<br />

the demo and check respectively. Krishnareddy et al., 2001 found that intercropping <strong>of</strong> cotton<br />

+ redgram was more beneficial than sole cropping <strong>of</strong> cotton in sense <strong>of</strong> monetary recoveries.<br />

The highest mean per day net returns were recorded as Rs 369/ha in the demo with the adoption<br />

<strong>of</strong> cotton+ redgram intercropping system over check Rs.262 /ha. Per day net returns value will<br />

depend on the net return and duration <strong>of</strong> the crops sown as intercrops and sole crops.<br />

References<br />

Blaise, D., Majumdar, G. and Tekale, K.U. 2005.On-farm evaluation <strong>of</strong> fertilizer application<br />

and conservation tillage on productivity <strong>of</strong> cotton+ pigeon pea strip intercropping on<br />

rainfed vertisols <strong>of</strong> central India. Soil Tillage Res., 84:108-117<br />

Krishna Reddy, S.V., Rao, M.U., Rao, R.S., Satyanarayana, S.V.V. and Krishna, S.K. 2001.<br />

Economic viability <strong>of</strong> various alternative crops in burley tobacco growing agency area<br />

<strong>of</strong> Andhra Pradesh. Tobacco Res., 27: 190-192<br />

Maitra, S. and Ray, D.P. 2019. Enrichment <strong>of</strong> biodiversity, influence in microbial population<br />

dynamics <strong>of</strong> soil and nutrient utilization in cereal-legume intercropping systems: A<br />

Review. Int J Biores Sci., 6(1): 11–19.<br />

Oad, F.C., Siddqui, M.H. and Buriro, U.A. 2007. Agronomic and economic interface between<br />

cotton Gossypium hirsutum L. and Pigeon Pea Cajanus cajan L. J. Agron. 6(1): 199-203<br />

T6-52P-1515<br />

Crop Diversification with Castor Crop for Maximizing Productivity and<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>itability in Ananthapuramu District <strong>of</strong> Andhra Pradesh<br />

G. Sashikala 1 , B. Chandana 1 , B. K. Kishore Reddy 1 , V. Siva Jyothi 1 , M. Ravi Kishore 1 ,<br />

K. Naveen Kumar 1 , Malleswari Sadhineni 1 , J. V. Prasad 2 and J. V. N. S. Prasad 3<br />

1 ANGRAU- Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Reddipalli, Andhra Pradesh – 515 701<br />

2<br />

ICAR-ATARI, CRIDA campus, Hyderabad – 500 059<br />

3<br />

TDC-NICRA, ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad – 500 059<br />

Ananthapuramu is the southern-most district <strong>of</strong> the Rayalaseema region <strong>of</strong> Andhra Pradesh.<br />

Agriculture remains the most important economic activity <strong>of</strong> the district, it is characterized by<br />

909 | Page Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

high levels <strong>of</strong> instability and uncertainty. Being in the rain-shadow region <strong>of</strong> Andhra Pradesh,<br />

the district is drought-prone. Groundnut is the main crop with 7.5 lakh ha which is purely<br />

rainfed. During the recent years, the yields <strong>of</strong> groundnut crop has been reduced drastically or<br />

sometimes the crop fails due to severe drought. Hence, there is a need to introduce pr<strong>of</strong>itable<br />

and sustainable crops. Crop diversification can be practiced in dryland areas to reduce the risk<br />

factor <strong>of</strong> crop failures due to recurring droughts (Khanam et al. 2018). Castor can be grown as<br />

an alternative to groundnut. Being hardy crop, it can be grown under rainfed conditions and<br />

thrives well on a variety <strong>of</strong> soils and climatic conditions (Reddy and Suresh, 2008). It was<br />

therefore, felt worthwhile to adopt the castor as an alternate crop was carried out in the farmers’<br />

fields under National Innovations on Climate Resilient Agriculture (NICRA) project. Crop<br />

diversification in a participatory mode was demonstrated in the NICRA TDC adopted villages<br />

Peravali, Chamaluru and Chakrayapeta villages.<br />

Methodology<br />

NICRA adopted villages Chamaluru, Peravali and Chakrayapeta falls under Narpala and<br />

Singanamala mandals <strong>of</strong> Ananthapuramu district respectively. The normal rainfall <strong>of</strong> the area<br />

566.2 mm. The total cultivated area <strong>of</strong> Chamaluru, Peravali and Chakrayapeta is 2162 ha, 714<br />

ha and 104 ha, respectively. The major soil types are red soils (90%) and light black soils<br />

(10%). The major rainfed crops cultivated during Kharif are groundnut, redgram and jowar.<br />

The actual crop seasonal rainfall was 200 mm in 2018, 398 mm in 2019, 748 mm in 2020 and<br />

647 mm in 2021.<br />

The treatment comprised <strong>of</strong> short duration castor hybrids (DCH-519 & ICH-66) and farmers<br />

practice is groundnut (K-6). The demonstration was conducted in 20.5 ha involving 34 farmers<br />

from the adopted villages. Crop yield (kg/ha) and economics were recorded. All the costs were<br />

determined considering the prevailing charges <strong>of</strong> agricultural operations and the market price<br />

<strong>of</strong> the involved inputs. During studies, gross returns were obtained by translating the harvest<br />

into monetary terms at the prevalent market rate.<br />

Results<br />

A comparison <strong>of</strong> yield performance between castor and farmer’s practice (groundnut) is<br />

depicted in Table 1. It was observed that, during 2021-22, castor resulted higher pod yield<br />

(1150 kg/ha) as compared to groundnut plot (670 kg/ha) with 71.6 per cent yield increase over<br />

the groundnut. Similar results were obtained in 2018 to 2021 with castor. The castor plots<br />

recorded higher mean pod yield (817 kg/ha) as compared to groundnut (485 kg/ha) with 66 per<br />

cent average increase in yield over the farmer’s practice.<br />

The economics <strong>of</strong> castor production under crop diversification was presented in Table 2.<br />

During the four-year period higher average gross return was recorded with demonstration plots<br />

(29266 Rs/ha) as compared to groundnut (27711 Rs/ha). During 2021-22, improved technology<br />

Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts<br />

910 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

produced higher gross return (46000 Rs/ha) compared to farmer’s practice (46900 Rs/ha).<br />

Similar results were obtained during 2019-20 and 2020-21 where demonstration gave higher<br />

gross return in comparison to groundnut due to higher yield obtained. The benefit: cost ratio<br />

during 2021-22 was 1.95:1 in demonstrated plot as compared to farmers practice (1.50:1).<br />

Similarly, during 2018-19, 2019-20 and 2020-21 demonstration plots obtained higher B:C ratio<br />

i.e. 1.77:1, 1.67:1 and 1.53:1, respectively. Similarly, the average across years indicated that<br />

the demonstration plot gave higher (1.73:1) B:C ratio from farmer practices (1.12:1). The<br />

variability in benefit cost ratio throughout the three years can be attributed primarily to yield<br />

performance and cost <strong>of</strong> inputs in those specific years. However, favourable benefit-cost ratios<br />

showed the economic feasibility <strong>of</strong> the crop diversification and persuaded the farmers on the<br />

effectiveness <strong>of</strong> intervention. These results confirm with the results <strong>of</strong> Hegde et al. (2003) who<br />

reported the improved technology plots recorded higher mean productivity, gross returns, and<br />

B: C ratio than farmers practice plots indicating improved technology's technical and economic<br />

feasibility <strong>of</strong> castor.<br />

Conclusion<br />

The findings <strong>of</strong> the study revealed that crop diversification with castor was found efficient in<br />

productivity and pr<strong>of</strong>itability by recording significantly the highest yield with low pest and<br />

disease incidence.<br />

References<br />

Hegde, D.M., Prakash Tiwari, S. and Rai, M. 2003. Crop diversification in Indian Agriculture.<br />

Agricultural situation in India. 255-272.<br />

Khanam, R., Badhuri, D and Nayak, A.K. 2018. Crop diversification: A way out for doubling<br />

farmer’s income. Indian Farming. 68(01): 31-32.<br />

Reddy, B.N. and Suresh, G. 2008 Crop diversification with oilseeds for higher pr<strong>of</strong>itability.<br />

Souvenir. National Symposium on News Paradigms in Agronomic Research. Navsari<br />

Agricultural University, Navsari, November,19-21,2008. pp.33-37.<br />

Year<br />

Yield parameters <strong>of</strong> castor and groundnut under rainfed conditions<br />

Area<br />

(ha)<br />

No. <strong>of</strong><br />

farmers<br />

Variety<br />

Pod yield (kg/ha) % Increase<br />

over<br />

Castor Groundnut Groundnut<br />

2018-19 2.5 4 DCH-519 419 277 51.3<br />

2019-20 5 5 DCH-519 875 512 70.9<br />

2020-21 5 5 DCH-519 824 482 70.9<br />

2021-22 8 20 ICH-66 1150 670 71.6<br />

Total/Mean 20.5 34 817 485 66.2<br />

911 | Page Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Economics <strong>of</strong> crop diversification with castor under rainfed conditions<br />

Year<br />

Gross<br />

(Rs/ha)<br />

Returns<br />

Cost <strong>of</strong> cultivation<br />

(Rs/ha)<br />

Net Returns<br />

(Rs/ha)<br />

B:C ratio<br />

2018-<br />

19<br />

2019-<br />

20<br />

2020-<br />

21<br />

Castor Groundnut Castor Groundnut Castor Groundnut Castor Groundnut<br />

11750 16847 20800 26875 9050 -10388 1.77 0.61<br />

30625 24550 18350 28410 12275 3860 1.67 1.16<br />

28690 22550 18750 27510<br />

9940 5260 1.53 1.21<br />

2021-<br />

22<br />

46000 46900 23540 31250<br />

22460 15650 1.95 1.50<br />

Mean 29266 27711 20360 28511 13431 3595 1.73 1.12<br />

Institutional Interventions for Climatic Risk Management<br />

Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts<br />

T6-53P-1668<br />

K. Nagasree, J. V. N. S. Prasad, C. A. Rama Rao, Jagriti Rohit, Anshida Beevi,<br />

K. Ravi Shankar, B. M. K. Raju and M. Prabhakar<br />

Central Research Institute for Dryland agriculture.<br />

Farming communities in semiarid areas <strong>of</strong> India are more vulnerable to impacts <strong>of</strong> weather<br />

aberrations and scarcity <strong>of</strong> resources. It is well evident that Climate change disproportionately<br />

affects the people occupying the lowest economic strata <strong>of</strong> the society having least capacity to<br />

respond and adapt to such rapid environmental change but are historically the least responsible<br />

for its causes. Untimely and uncertain extreme weather events create adverse impacts affecting<br />

crop yield parameters, losses to village level resources and infrastructure particularly rural<br />

communities in climatically vulnerable areas. The capacity <strong>of</strong> farmers to cope with such<br />

different forms <strong>of</strong> risk will become ever more crucial, and extension efforts must pay special<br />

attention to educating farmers about their options to enhance resilience and response capacity<br />

(IPCC, 2007).<br />

Accurate climate information on climate resilient technologies and the ability to interpret it<br />

allow farmers to plan and make better decisions on how to adapt to climate change. Livelihood<br />

support includes strengthening community organization, natural resource management, income<br />

generation, access to markets and living conditions, combined with building capacity to<br />

analyze hazards and stresses and improved early warning and contingency planning. This is<br />

further adapted for climate change by improving people’s ability to deal with uncertainty by<br />

promoting knowledge, access to information and support for learning and experimentation<br />

912 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

(Pasteur, 2009). Literature highlights that the success <strong>of</strong> these adaptation efforts generally<br />

hinges upon the nature <strong>of</strong> existing formal and informal rural institutions. Mubaya et al, 2017<br />

reported that significant efforts have been made to understand impacts and how communities<br />

adapt to climate change impacts, yet there is an urgent need to interrogate the capacity <strong>of</strong><br />

institutions and institutional arrangements in local level adaptation processes. Hence improving<br />

climate resilience among rural households in various agricultural systems requires the<br />

collective action at grassroots level as a localized solution to tackle vagaries <strong>of</strong> climate<br />

extremes.<br />

It is in this backdrop; suitable strategies are deployed for adaptation and resilience to climate<br />

change at grassroots level and to enhance coping ability <strong>of</strong> farming communities under the<br />

technology demonstration component <strong>of</strong> NICRA project implemented by ICAR-CRIDA.<br />

Social interventions like creation <strong>of</strong> VCRMC, Village Climatic risk Management committee at<br />

the NICRA villages <strong>of</strong> KVK are envisaged to have inclusive approach for facilitating<br />

community participation, capacity improvement to take up climate adaptation plans.<br />

Objectives<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

Accordingly, the study to analyze the Institutional processes has taken up with the<br />

following objectives.<br />

To analyze the VCRMCS structure and composition across the NICRA- technology<br />

demonstration component villages<br />

To delineate the functional processes <strong>of</strong> VCRMCs operation across ATARIs.<br />

Results<br />

VCRMC is intended to promote community’s partnership accountability and responsibility for<br />

the climate resilient technologies showcased at the field level. It would lead to the enhanced<br />

flexibility, transparency and enabling mechanisms for dissemination <strong>of</strong> the climate resilient<br />

technologies among rural communities. Khan et al, 2020 stated that CBOs play important role<br />

in reducing the negative impacts <strong>of</strong> climate change by enhancing the adoption <strong>of</strong> adaptation<br />

strategies. It is also evident from the study the need <strong>of</strong> further strengthening and<br />

institutionalizing the informal farmers’ groups and institutions for the successful adaptation.<br />

913 | Page Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Details <strong>of</strong> ATARI zone wise KVKs and VCRMC members (Till 2020.)<br />

S.No. ZONE ATARI No. <strong>of</strong> KVKs No. <strong>of</strong> villages VCRMC Members<br />

1 ZONE I LUDHIANA 13 62 1318<br />

2 ZONE II JODHPUR 7 24 1264<br />

3 ZONE III KANPUR 13 35 1224<br />

4 ZONE IV PATNA 13 51 1487<br />

5 ZONE V KOLKATA 9 31 1134<br />

6 ZONE VI GUWAHATI 9 27 870<br />

7 ZONE VII BARAPANI 14 41 1216<br />

8 ZONE VIII PUNE 13 43 3080<br />

9 ZONE IX JABALPUR 12 29 1939<br />

10 ZONE X HYDERABAD 11 38 973<br />

11 ZONE XI BENGALURU 7 16 794<br />

121 397 15299<br />

The experiences <strong>of</strong> VCRMC functioning reveals the potential <strong>of</strong> grassroot partnerships and<br />

linkages in leveraging the adaptive capacity and overall community resilience. Brown et al<br />

2015 mentioned the linkage <strong>of</strong> households with local informal institutions fosters social<br />

learning, which builds adaptive capacity. The linkage <strong>of</strong> these institutions with other formal<br />

local and external institutions facilitates exchange <strong>of</strong> knowledge and resources that can foster<br />

resilience. The institutional setup in NICRA villages is unique in the way that they are custom<br />

tailored to the needs and priorities <strong>of</strong> rural stakeholders addressing location specific problems<br />

in various agro eco regions <strong>of</strong> the country.<br />

Conclusion<br />

The study results reveal that the presence <strong>of</strong> exclusively functioning institutions like VCRMC<br />

with an aim <strong>of</strong> climate resilience, equip rural communities to respond better for unexpected<br />

climate shocks and induced climate awareness with access to timely climate advisory services.<br />

References<br />

Agrawal, A., Sweeney., C.M.C. and Perrin, N. 2008. Local Institutions and Climate Change<br />

Adaptation. The social dimensions <strong>of</strong> climate change. Social development notes.<br />

Community driven development.<br />

Brown., H. C. P and. Sonwa, D. J. 2015. Rural local institutions and climate change adaptation<br />

in forest communities in Cameroon. Ecology and Society, 20(2):6<br />

Jonatan A. Lassa, 2019. Negotiating Institutional Pathways for Sustaining Climate Change<br />

Resilience and Risk Governance in Indonesia. Climate 2019, 7, 95.<br />

Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts<br />

914 | Page


International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />

Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />

Climate Change. 2001: The Scientific Basis. Contribution <strong>of</strong> Working Group I to the Third<br />

Assessment Report <strong>of</strong> the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Houghton, J.T.,<br />

et al. (eds)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York,<br />

NY, USA, 881 pp.<br />

IPCC. 2007. Climate Change 2007. Synthesis Report. Contribution <strong>of</strong> Working Groups I, II &<br />

III to the Fourth Assessment Report <strong>of</strong> the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.<br />

Geneva<br />

Khan N.A., Gao, Q & Abid, M.2020. Public institutions’ capacities regarding climate change<br />

adaptation and risk management support in agriculture: the case <strong>of</strong> Punjab province,<br />

Pakistan. Scientific Reports. (2020) 10:14111. Mubaya, C.P and Mafongoya , P. 2017.<br />

The role <strong>of</strong> institutions in managing local level climate change adaptation in semiarid<br />

Zimbabwe. Climate risk management. 16(2017):93-105.<br />

915 | Page Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!