Book of Extended summaries ISDA
Book of Extended summaries ISDA
Book of Extended summaries ISDA
- No tags were found...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Extended</strong> Summaries<br />
22-24 December, 2022<br />
Supported by<br />
Department <strong>of</strong><br />
Science &<br />
Technology<br />
Government <strong>of</strong><br />
India<br />
Organized by<br />
Indian Society <strong>of</strong> Dryland Agriculture<br />
ICAR-Central Research Ins tute for Dryland Agriculture<br />
Indian Council <strong>of</strong> Agricultural Research
<strong>Extended</strong> Summaries<br />
First International Conference<br />
Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems:<br />
Challenges & Opportunities<br />
22 – 24 December 2022<br />
Edited by<br />
C A Rama Rao, M Srinivasa Rao, S Suvana, A K Shanker, G Pratibha,<br />
R Rejani, S Kundu, H B Santosh, B V Asewar, J Rohit, K V Rao & V K Singh<br />
Organized by<br />
Indian Society <strong>of</strong> Dryland Agriculture<br />
ICAR-Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture<br />
Indian Council <strong>of</strong> Agricultural Research
Citation<br />
Rama Rao, C.A., Srinivasa Rao, M., Suvana S, Shanker, A.K., Pratibha, G., Rejani, R., Kundu, S.,<br />
Santosh, H.B., Asewar, B.V., Rohit, J., Rao, K.V. & Singh, V.K. 2022. First International Conference in<br />
‘Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges and Opportunities’. <strong>Extended</strong> Summaries. Indian<br />
Society <strong>of</strong> Dryland Agriculture, Hyderabad. p. 915.<br />
© Indian Society <strong>of</strong> Dryland Agriculture (<strong>ISDA</strong>), Hyderabad<br />
December 2022<br />
Published by<br />
Organizing Secretary<br />
First International Conference<br />
ICAR-CRIDA<br />
Hyderabad 500059<br />
ISBN: 978-93-80883-67-0<br />
Copyright © 2022 Indian Society <strong>of</strong> Dryland Agriculture, <strong>ISDA</strong> &<br />
ICAR- Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, CRIDA<br />
Assisted by:<br />
Girish, P., Gayatri, D.L.A, Navya, M., A Siva Kumar., Samba Shiva, G., Lokesh,<br />
G., Deepika, S. Kalyan, Pratyusha G.S.<br />
Disclaimer: The views expressed in this publication by the authors are their own and these do not<br />
necessarily reflect those <strong>of</strong> the organizers / sponsors or their respective institutes.
Contents<br />
Theme Title Page No.<br />
1 Resilience through land and water management<br />
interventions, water management and governance<br />
2 Ecosystem based approaches for climate change<br />
adaptation, ecosystem services, integrated farming<br />
system models, Land degradation neutrality<br />
1-139<br />
140-235<br />
2a Climate resilient agriculture for risk mitigation 236-330<br />
3 Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress<br />
tolerance<br />
4 Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed<br />
agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic<br />
farming, INM, soil-microorganisms-plant<br />
interactions<br />
331-429<br />
430-557<br />
4a Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture 558-693<br />
5 Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for<br />
crop management & assessment<br />
6 Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated<br />
and enhanced impacts<br />
694-793<br />
794-915
Resilience through land and water<br />
management interventions, water<br />
management and governance<br />
Theme– 1
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Theme – 1: Resilience through land and water management<br />
interventions, water management and governance<br />
List <strong>of</strong> <strong>Extended</strong> Summaries<br />
S.No Title First Author ID<br />
1. Low-Cost Tube-well Recharge Technology<br />
for Enhancing Water Availability<br />
2. Modified Agronomic Practices for<br />
Enhancing Efficiency <strong>of</strong> Hydrogels in<br />
Groundnut under Semi-arid Ecologies <strong>of</strong><br />
Andhra Pradesh<br />
3. Farm Ponds in Semi-Arid Region <strong>of</strong><br />
Maharashtra<br />
4. Climate Resilience Through Inclusive Water<br />
Management Over A Decade: A Successful<br />
Case Study <strong>of</strong> Yelerampura Gram<br />
Panchayat, Tumakuru District, Karnataka<br />
5. Resilience through water conservation and<br />
adoption <strong>of</strong> drought tolerant crop variety in<br />
NICRA village Gunia, Gumla, Jharkhand<br />
6. Transforming agriculture through<br />
Hydroponics: An innovative water-efficient<br />
technology for rainfed areas<br />
7. Enhancing Water Productivity in Rainfed<br />
Agriculture through in-situ and ex-situ Rain<br />
Water Harvesting- NICRA Experiences<br />
8. Enhancement <strong>of</strong> Rainfed Cotton Production<br />
Through Supplemental Irrigation in<br />
Vertisols Tract <strong>of</strong> Southern Tamil Nadu<br />
9. Enhancing Climate Resilient Agriculture in<br />
Semi-Arid Region through Group Micro<br />
Irrigation by Collectivization and Equitable<br />
Sharing <strong>of</strong> Groundwater: Case Study in<br />
Maharashtra and Telangana, India<br />
10. Soil Preferential Flow: A Case Study from<br />
Semi-arid Watershed<br />
11. Micro-Irrigation Based Supplemental<br />
Irrigation Using Harvested Rainwater for<br />
Sustainable Agriculture Under Rainfed<br />
Ecosystems<br />
12. Increasing the Productivity <strong>of</strong> Rainfed Rice-<br />
Based Double Cropping System Through<br />
Supplemental Irrigation Under Medium<br />
Lowland Situation <strong>of</strong> North Bank Plains<br />
Zone (NBPZ) <strong>of</strong> Assam<br />
Navab Singh<br />
GA Rajanna<br />
Sarita Chemburkar<br />
Ramesh<br />
T1-01O-1003<br />
T1-02O-1125<br />
T1-03O-1133<br />
T1-04O-1181<br />
Sanjay Kumar T1-05 O-1189<br />
Ankur Agarwal<br />
BV Asewar<br />
M Manikandan<br />
Arun Bhagat<br />
Pushpanjali<br />
Abrar Yousuf<br />
Arun Jyothi<br />
T1-05aO-1375<br />
T1-05bO-1161<br />
T1-06R-1005<br />
T1-07R-1062<br />
T1-08R-1149<br />
T1-09R-1172<br />
T1-10R-1382<br />
Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance<br />
1 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
S.No Title First Author ID<br />
13. Evaluation <strong>of</strong> In Situ Moisture Conservation<br />
Techniques for Sustainable Productivity <strong>of</strong><br />
Chick pea in Bundelkhand Region<br />
CM Tripathi<br />
T1-11R-1402<br />
14. Jalkund: Low-cost water harvesting<br />
structure for sustainable livelihood in rainfed<br />
agroecosystem <strong>of</strong> Chandel district, Manipur,<br />
India<br />
15. Effect <strong>of</strong> Hydrogel and Organic Manures to<br />
Mitigate Abiotic Stress in Groundnut Under<br />
Rainfed Conditions <strong>of</strong> Saurashtra Region<br />
16. Straw Mulching as Climate Resilience<br />
Measure for In-situ Water Management and<br />
enhancing Productivity <strong>of</strong> Rainfed Soybean<br />
17. Irrigation Requirement <strong>of</strong> Major Crops<br />
Under Changing Climatic Scenarios in<br />
Northern Gujarat Zone<br />
18. Resilience in Rainfed Agriculture through<br />
Rainwater Management based on<br />
Catchment-Storage-Command Relationship<br />
in Assured Rainfall Zone <strong>of</strong> Marathwada<br />
Region<br />
19. Nutrient uptake, harvest index and<br />
economics <strong>of</strong> wheat varieties as influenced<br />
by alternate furrow irrigation<br />
20. Comparison <strong>of</strong> sustainable dryland cropping<br />
under Reduced Run<strong>of</strong>f Farming in Alfisols<br />
<strong>of</strong> Karnataka<br />
21. Conservation Furrow-A Low-Cost Climate<br />
Resilient Technology to Enhance the<br />
Productivity <strong>of</strong> Rainfed Crops and Cropping<br />
Systems in Scarce Rainfall Zone <strong>of</strong> Andhra<br />
Pradesh<br />
22. Conservation and Rainwater Storage<br />
Structure (CNB) on Drainage Line for<br />
Developing Groundwater Regimes in<br />
Vidarbha Region<br />
23. Effect <strong>of</strong> Irrigation and Nitrogen Sources on<br />
Yield and Water Use Efficiency <strong>of</strong> Lettuce<br />
(Lactuca Sativa L.) in West Bengal<br />
24. Effect <strong>of</strong> Irrigation and Mulch on Summer<br />
Babycorn (Zea mays L.) in New Alluvial<br />
Zone <strong>of</strong> West Bengal<br />
25. Enhancing Water Productivity in the Scarce<br />
Rainfall Zone <strong>of</strong> Andhra Pradesh through<br />
Farmponds with Seepage Control<br />
Kangjam Sonamani<br />
Singh<br />
PD Vekariya<br />
SH Narale<br />
R Rejani<br />
Ananya Mishra<br />
Jyoti<br />
Santosh Nagappa<br />
Ningoji<br />
A Malliswara Reddy<br />
RS Patode<br />
Madhurima Dey<br />
VVS Jaya Krishna<br />
Boini Narsimlu<br />
T1-11aR-1526<br />
T1-12P-1011<br />
T1-13P-1023<br />
T1-14P-1037<br />
T1-15P-1057<br />
T1-16P-1070<br />
T1-17P-1078<br />
T1-18P-1083<br />
T1-19P-1129<br />
T1-20P-1144<br />
T1-21P-1145<br />
T1-22P-1197<br />
2 | Page Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
S.No Title First Author ID<br />
26. Maximize the Production <strong>of</strong> Blackgram<br />
Through Furrow Irrigated Raised Bed<br />
Planting Methods Under Aberrated Climatic<br />
Regions<br />
27. Integrating Improved Land, Water<br />
Management Practices and Cropping<br />
Systems for Sustainable Farming in<br />
Drylands <strong>of</strong> Northern Karnataka: A Case<br />
Study<br />
28. Effect <strong>of</strong> Supplemental Irrigation on Yield<br />
and Economics <strong>of</strong> Different Pulse and<br />
Oilseed Crops under Dryland Condition in<br />
Palamau Region <strong>of</strong> Jharkhand<br />
29. Water Use Yield and Economics <strong>of</strong> Maize as<br />
Influenced by Drip Irrigation Schedules and<br />
Nitrogen Levels<br />
30. Jalkund Low Cost Rain Water Harvesting<br />
and Utilization for Rabi Season Vegetable<br />
Production in Rabitar, Namchi District,<br />
Sikkim, India<br />
31. Economic Feasibility <strong>of</strong> Farmponds: A case<br />
study <strong>of</strong> Drainage Line Treatment Scheme in<br />
Wayanad District, Kerala<br />
32. Optimum Sowing window and water stress<br />
at critical stages on the growth and yield <strong>of</strong><br />
groundnut crop- A modeling approach<br />
33. Effect <strong>of</strong> Super Absorbent Polymers<br />
(Hydrogel), Bioagent (Trichoderma) and<br />
Organic Manures in Water Management <strong>of</strong><br />
Rainfed Wheat (Triticum aestivum) in<br />
Eastern Uttar Pradesh<br />
34. Ratooning Sorghum for Agronomic<br />
Rainwater Management<br />
35. Performance <strong>of</strong> Groundnut Under Micro<br />
Irrigation Methods, Schedules and Varied<br />
Fertilizer Doses<br />
36. Water harvesting technologies for enhancing<br />
productivity <strong>of</strong> rainfed agriculture contribute<br />
to resilience<br />
37. Performance evaluation <strong>of</strong> standard<br />
performance indicators <strong>of</strong> telugu ganga<br />
project in Andhra Pradesh<br />
38. Catchment–Storage-Command Relationship<br />
for Increasing Water Productivity in Micro-<br />
Watershed <strong>of</strong> Raichur District<br />
RK Singh<br />
MS Shirahatti<br />
Nargis Kumari<br />
Y Deepthi Kiran<br />
Indra Prashad<br />
Shivakoti<br />
S Lokesh<br />
AVM Subba Rao<br />
Sayoni Das<br />
V Maruthi<br />
K Sathish Babu<br />
KV Rao<br />
Ch Murali Krishna<br />
RH Rajkumar<br />
T1-23P-1198<br />
T1-24P-1229<br />
T1-25P-1265<br />
T1-26P-1275<br />
T1-27P-1290<br />
T1-28P-1321<br />
T1-29P-1322<br />
T1-30P-1327<br />
T1-31P-1334<br />
T1-32P-1335<br />
T1-33P-1357<br />
T1-34P-1358<br />
T1-35P-1384<br />
Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance<br />
3 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
S.No Title First Author ID<br />
39. Impact <strong>of</strong> Raising Bund Height Around Rice<br />
Field on Water Management, Growth, Yield<br />
and Economics<br />
40. Performance <strong>of</strong> Land Shaping as a Climate<br />
Smart Model for the Sundarban<br />
41. Irrigation Requirement <strong>of</strong> Different Crops <strong>of</strong><br />
Krishna Basin Under Changing Climatic<br />
Scenarios<br />
42. Impact <strong>of</strong> Borewell Recharging Structures in<br />
NICRA Village<br />
43. Recycling <strong>of</strong> harvested rainwater through<br />
farm pond to enhance productivity <strong>of</strong> rabi<br />
crops under semi-arid region<br />
44. Rain Water Harvesting Technology, Jalkund<br />
- A Boon for Far Flung Hilly Farmers Under<br />
NICRA<br />
45. In-Situ Moisture Conservation and Natural<br />
Nitrification Inhibitors for Adaptation And<br />
Mitigation Of Climate Change In Semi-Arid<br />
Rainfed Regions<br />
46. Impact <strong>of</strong> Subsoiling on Soil moisture<br />
dynamics, soil physical properties and yield<br />
under finger millet + pigeonpea and groundnut<br />
+ pigeonpea cropping systems<br />
47. Checkdams - A way for rainwater harvesting,<br />
climate resilience and sustainability <strong>of</strong> rainfed<br />
farmers in Ananthapuramu, Andhra Pradesh<br />
Deokaran<br />
PK Garain<br />
D Kalyana Srinivas<br />
G Hiregoudar<br />
JK Balyan<br />
R Lalrambeiseia<br />
G Pratibha<br />
K Devaraja<br />
B Chandana<br />
T1-36P-1400<br />
T1-37P-1416<br />
T1-38P-1424<br />
T1-39P-1430<br />
T1-40P-1432<br />
T1-41P-1449<br />
T1-42P-1462<br />
T1-43P-1494<br />
T1-44P-1517<br />
48. Improved Jhum in southern part <strong>of</strong> Mizoram H Vanlalhmuliana T1-45P-1532<br />
49. Development <strong>of</strong> digital weighing type<br />
lysimeter to monitor soil water balance<br />
parameters<br />
50. Popularization <strong>of</strong> Climate Smart Technology –<br />
Jalkund/Farm Pond for Crop Cultivation Post<br />
Monsoon Period<br />
51. Land Configuration Management for<br />
Enhancing the Crop Productivity<br />
52. Impact and Effectiveness <strong>of</strong> Rainwater<br />
Management Activities and Water Utilization<br />
for Rainfed Crops in the Semi-arid Region -A<br />
Case Study<br />
53. Effect <strong>of</strong> In-situ moisture conservation<br />
practices on productivity and economics <strong>of</strong><br />
maize based cropping system under rainfed<br />
ecosystem <strong>of</strong> South Bihar<br />
54. Evaluation <strong>of</strong> cherry tomato (Solanum<br />
lycopersicum var. cerasiformae) cultivars<br />
Ajita Gupta<br />
T Amrutha<br />
Sreedhar Chauhan<br />
S Vijayakumar<br />
MK Singh<br />
Harendra Kumar<br />
T1-46P-1533<br />
T1-47P-1574<br />
T1-48P-1582<br />
T1-49P-1281<br />
T1-50P-1617<br />
T1-51P-1383<br />
4 | Page Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
S.No Title First Author ID<br />
under hydroponics for growth, yield, and<br />
quality parameters<br />
55. Impact Assessment <strong>of</strong> Farm Pond on Demand<br />
Scheme <strong>of</strong> Maharashtra<br />
56. Impact <strong>of</strong> Soil and Water Conservation<br />
Interventions on The Livelihood <strong>of</strong> Tribal<br />
Farmers from The Hilly Area <strong>of</strong> Palghar<br />
District<br />
57. Application Technologies for Harvested<br />
Rainwater in Ponds: Issues and Prospects<br />
S Gireesh<br />
Pavan Jadhav<br />
Manoranjan Kumar<br />
T1-52P-1307<br />
T1-53P-1503<br />
T1-54P-1755<br />
Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance<br />
5 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
T1-01O-1003<br />
Low-Cost Tube-well Recharge Technology for Enhancing Water<br />
Availability<br />
Navab Singh, P. P. Rohilla, S. K. Singh, and Dilip Matwa<br />
ICAR-Agricultural Technology Application Research Institute, Zone-II<br />
CAZRI Campus, Jodhpur-342 005. Rajasthan. INDIA.<br />
In India, climate vulnerabilities addressed are drought, flood, cyclone, heat waves, cold waves,<br />
etc. which are likely to threaten the food security and livelihood <strong>of</strong> millions <strong>of</strong> people in urban,<br />
peri-urban, and rural areas as well. Groundwater is clearly the preferred source for farmers.<br />
This is one <strong>of</strong> the reasons why India has experienced explosive growth in groundwater demand<br />
during recent decades (Pendke et al. 2017). The NICRA villages have become hubs <strong>of</strong> learning<br />
on climate-resilient agriculture in a short span, opening up opportunities for horizontal and<br />
vertical diffusion <strong>of</strong> successful interventions in other parts <strong>of</strong> the districts. Due to changes in<br />
climatic conditions and rainfall, the climate changed in Rajasthan, since the last ten years<br />
rainfall pattern has changed, the dry spell is more, and also an uneven distribution <strong>of</strong> rains. It<br />
is therefore important to enhance the residence <strong>of</strong> the Indian agriculture production system to<br />
climate variability and change. In this regard, Krishi Vigyan Kendra Bharatpur under NICRA<br />
Project developed low-cost tube-well recharge technology to improve the groundwater quality<br />
and availability as well.<br />
Methodology<br />
Water stress is being felt in different parts <strong>of</strong> the country owing to the increasing demand<br />
resulting from the population explosion (CGWB 2007). Most <strong>of</strong> the farmers were unaware <strong>of</strong><br />
in-situ soil and water conservation techniques. A few farmers were recharging their tube wells<br />
by using indigenous methods, viz., by the opening valve <strong>of</strong> the Kachcha tube well in the rainy<br />
season to restore run-<strong>of</strong>f water. But due to filtration problems silt is deposited in the pit and<br />
needs frequent cleaning, which is a tiresome process and huge water losses. Based on the above<br />
findings and the usefulness <strong>of</strong> recharging tube-well; KVK Bharatpur has developed indigenous<br />
wisdom <strong>of</strong> farmers with scientific input to design a low-cost recharging structure <strong>of</strong> tube-well<br />
(`10000/-only) using locally available cement pipes (perforated), brick wall in tube-well and<br />
prepared a pit also for water filtration separately outside the tube-well.<br />
Results<br />
More than 125 tube-well recharging structures have been completed successfully in Sitara<br />
village <strong>of</strong> Bharatpur district and farmers <strong>of</strong> Sahenti and Mukundpura nearby villages have also<br />
adopted this low-cost technology. Major crops in the rabi season minimized 90% <strong>of</strong> the yield<br />
losses due to recharged groundwater (8-10ft); due to which farmers cultivated wheat, barley,<br />
6 | Page Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
and vegetables other than mustard. Collected run-<strong>of</strong>f water helped farmers to pre-irrigate fields<br />
for sowing <strong>of</strong> rabi crops when September rains were not received. This intervention<br />
significantly increased in shallow acquirer level (2.5 to 4.0 m) and collected approximately<br />
4000 cubic meters <strong>of</strong> rainwater which was continuously delivered in tube wells. Similar results<br />
have been reported by earlier workers (Palanisami et al. 2006, Kambale et al. 2009, and<br />
Honnannavar et al. 2016).<br />
Details <strong>of</strong> parameters <strong>of</strong> Wheat demonstrations at farmers’ fields under NICRA Project<br />
Year Variety No. <strong>of</strong><br />
farmers<br />
Area (ha)<br />
Local check<br />
Average yield q/ha<br />
Demonstrations % increase<br />
2017-18 Raj. 4238 148 150.54 36.90 52.15 41.33<br />
2018-19 Raj. 4238 112 80.50 39.50 55.57 40.68<br />
2019-20 Raj. 4238 118 47.20 37.80 54.00 42.85<br />
2020-21 Raj. 4238 120 48.00 37.50 53.83 43.55<br />
Total -- 498 326.24 151.68 215.52 168.0<br />
Average -- -- -- 37.92 53.88 42.00<br />
Details <strong>of</strong> parameters <strong>of</strong> Barley demonstrations at farmers’ field under NICRA Project<br />
Year Variety No. <strong>of</strong><br />
farmers<br />
Area (ha)<br />
Local check<br />
Average yield q/ha<br />
Demonstrations % increase<br />
2017-18 RD-2794 52 31.16 23.25 31.40 35.05<br />
2018-19 RD-2794 15 8.00 21.30 29.08 36.50<br />
2019-20 RD-2794 15 6.00 22.80 30.98 35.80<br />
2020-21 RD-2794 20 8.00 23.50 31.35 33.40<br />
Total -- 102 53.16 9.84 122.80 140.80<br />
Average -- -- -- 22.71 30.70 35.20<br />
Details <strong>of</strong> parameters <strong>of</strong> Mustard demonstrations at farmers’ field under NICRA Project<br />
Year Variety No. <strong>of</strong><br />
farmers<br />
Area<br />
(ha)<br />
Local check<br />
Average yield q/ha<br />
Demonstrations % increase<br />
2017-18 DRMRIJ-31 134 54.22 19.25 28.00 45.45<br />
2018-19 DRMRIJ-31 188 75.20 20.30 29.50 45.30<br />
2019-20 DRMRIJ-31 118 47.20 19.20 27.80 44.80<br />
2020-21 DRMRIJ-31 120 48.00 21.40 31.35 46.50<br />
Total -- 560 224.62 80.16 116.60 182.00<br />
Average -- -- -- 20.04 29.15 45.50<br />
This low-cost tube-well recharge technology proved highly useful in decreasing irrigation<br />
costs, and soil salinity due to improvement in groundwater quality. This successful intervention<br />
has increased irrigated area as well as percent increase yield <strong>of</strong> 42.00, 35.20, and 45.50,<br />
Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance<br />
7 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
respectively in wheat, barley, and mustard This intervention has created awareness among the<br />
farming community and helped them immensely in solving the water deficit problem and<br />
encouraged them for water conservation practices. Recently, Veeranna and Jeet (2020) have<br />
studied similar groundwater recharge technology for water resource management following the<br />
standard guidelines <strong>of</strong> CGWB.<br />
Conclusion<br />
The low-cost tube-well recharge technology has been found very economic and useful in<br />
decreasing irrigation costs due to which most <strong>of</strong> the farmers have adopted it in several villages<br />
<strong>of</strong> the Bharatpur district <strong>of</strong> Rajasthan. Soil salinity has also been decreased due to improvement<br />
in groundwater quality which has been successfully used for growing vegetable crops in<br />
addition to wheat, barley, and mustard crops in the study area. Hence, such type <strong>of</strong> innovation<br />
should be up-scaled and replicated under prevailing farming situations to improve groundwater<br />
quality and to decrease soil salinity as well.<br />
References<br />
CGWB. 2007. Guide on artificial recharge to Groundwater: 1-54<br />
(http://www.cgwb.gov.in/documents/Manual-Artificial-Recharge.pdf).<br />
Honnannavar, S., Kambar, J., Patil, S. and Savant, C. 2016. Borewell recharging through<br />
rainwater harvesting by V-wire technology. J. Chem. Pharm. Res. 8(3):47-50.<br />
Kambale, J.B., Sarangi, A., Singh, D.K. and Singh, A.K. 2009. Performance Evaluation <strong>of</strong><br />
filtration unit <strong>of</strong> groundwater shaft: groundwater study. Curr. Sci. 96(4): 471-474.<br />
https://www.jstor.org/stable/24105453.<br />
Palanisami, K., Raviraj, A., and Thirumurthi, S. 2006. Artificial Recharge in Hard Rock Areas<br />
<strong>of</strong> Coimbatore District –A Case Study. International Conference on Groundwater<br />
sustainable Development problems, perspectives, and challenges (IGC-2006).<br />
http://jnuenvis.nic.in/publication/IGC%202006%20Abstracts.pdf.<br />
Pendke, M.S., Asewar, B.V., Gore, A.K., Wasker, D.P. and Samindre, M.S. 2017. Open and<br />
bore well technology. AICRP for Dryland agriculture. ISBNo: 978-93-85456-19-0.<br />
Veeranna, J. and Jeet, P. 2020. Groundwater Recharges Technology for Water Resource<br />
Management: A Case Study. 10.5772/intechopen.93946.<br />
8 | Page Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
T1-02O-1125<br />
Modified Agronomic Practices for Enhancing Efficiency <strong>of</strong> Hydrogels in<br />
Groundnut under Semi-arid Ecologies <strong>of</strong> Andhra Pradesh<br />
G.A. Rajanna, B. C. Ajay, K. K. Reddy and C. S. Praharaj<br />
ICAR-Directorate <strong>of</strong> Groundnut Research, Regional Station, Ananthapur, Andhra Pradesh 515701<br />
One <strong>of</strong> the main oilseed crops, groundnut accounts for around 26% <strong>of</strong> India's total oilseed<br />
production. About 7.6 lakh hectares <strong>of</strong> groundnut are grown in Andhra Pradesh, with an annual<br />
production <strong>of</strong> 4.8 lakh tonnes. It is a significant oilseed crop in the Rayalaseema districts <strong>of</strong><br />
Andhra Pradesh (Ananthapur, Karnool, Cuddapah, Chittoor, and Sathya Sai Jilla). Because <strong>of</strong><br />
the high erratic nature <strong>of</strong> the rainfall in these locations, farmers were unable to make use <strong>of</strong> the<br />
extra moisture. However, during the flowering and pod-filling periods, the groundnut crop is<br />
severely stressed by dryness. Due to lack <strong>of</strong> appropriate water absorption materials, the<br />
inconsistent rainfall that the crop got during that time was effectively wasted. Polymer<br />
hydrogels are one such material that can absorb the excess rainwater and release as and when<br />
the crop needs (Rajanna et al., 2022). However, the typical way <strong>of</strong> applying hydrogel is soil<br />
application, led to erroneous germination and reduced crop yields in the long run. To maximise<br />
the advantages <strong>of</strong> polymer hydrogels, we must thus change the way they are applied. According<br />
to Rajanna et al. (2021), seed treatment with pusa hydrogel and SPG 1118 led to higher<br />
biological and seed yields in the soybean-wheat system than soil application. In light <strong>of</strong> this, a<br />
field study was carried out to investigate the impact <strong>of</strong> altered agronomic procedures for<br />
improving various hydrogels efficiency in terms <strong>of</strong> growth and yield qualities in semi-arid<br />
conditions <strong>of</strong> Andhra Pradesh.<br />
Methodology<br />
A field study was conducted at ICAR-Directorate <strong>of</strong> Groundnut Research, Regional Station,<br />
Ananthapur during kharif season <strong>of</strong> 2021-22 to study the effect <strong>of</strong> modified agronomic<br />
practices for enhancing efficiency <strong>of</strong> hydrogels in groundnut under semi-arid ecologies <strong>of</strong><br />
Andhra Pradesh. The experiment consisted <strong>of</strong> ten treatments having two types <strong>of</strong> hydrogels<br />
(SPG 1118 and Aaridhar) applied with three types <strong>of</strong> method <strong>of</strong> application (soil application,<br />
slurry application and seed treatment) along with FYM, no gypsum application and control<br />
plots using RBD with three replications. Sowing was done on 06 th July 2021 using Kadari<br />
Lepakshi (K1812) variety <strong>of</strong> groundnut planted at a planting interval <strong>of</strong> 30×10 cm in a gross<br />
plot area <strong>of</strong> 27 m 2 . The recommended rate <strong>of</strong> fertilizer used was 20:40:50 kg NPK/ha along<br />
with gypsum application (500 kg/ha) at 25 days after sowing. The source <strong>of</strong> fertilizers were<br />
DAP, Urea and MOP. At various growing phases, all growth and yield observations were<br />
recorded, and the data was statistically analyzed.<br />
Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance<br />
9 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Results<br />
Results <strong>of</strong> the study indicated that, seed treatment with SPG-1118 hydrogel application<br />
exhibited significantly higher pod yield (1674.1 kg/ha), haulm yield (3919.5 kg/ha), kernel<br />
yield (1153.2 kg/ha) and shelling percentage (69.0%) as compared to control plots and other<br />
aaridhar hydrogel applied plots. However, harvest index was found to be non-significant. Soil<br />
application <strong>of</strong> commercially available Aaridhar hydrogel recorded significantly lower growth<br />
and yield attributes. Similarly, hydrogels with no gypsum applied plots also recorded<br />
significantly lower yields than others. Concurrently, higher soil moisture content was observed<br />
under application <strong>of</strong> FYM+ SPG1118 hydrogel applied plots over other plots.<br />
Yield (kg/ha)<br />
4500 Pod yield (kg/ha) Haulm yield (kg/ha)<br />
4000<br />
Kernel yield (kg/ha) Shelling %<br />
3500<br />
3000<br />
2500<br />
2000<br />
1500<br />
1000<br />
500<br />
0<br />
80<br />
70<br />
60<br />
50<br />
40<br />
30<br />
20<br />
10<br />
0<br />
Harvest index (%) & shelling %<br />
Effect <strong>of</strong> seed treatment, slurry and soil application on yield attributes and yields <strong>of</strong> groundnut<br />
Conclusion<br />
Seed treated hydrogel plots having significantly higher germination rates over soil applied<br />
hydrogel plots. Therefore, under variable rainfall conditions, modifying method <strong>of</strong> application<br />
<strong>of</strong> hydrogels in terms <strong>of</strong> seed treatment having higher yield advantage over normal practice <strong>of</strong><br />
soil application.<br />
References<br />
Rajanna, G.A., Manna, S., Singh, A., Babu, S., Singh, V.K., Dass, A., Chakraborty, D.,<br />
Patanjali, N., Chopra, I., Banerjee, T., Kumar, A., Khandelwal, A. and Parmar, B.S. 2022.<br />
Biopolymeric superabsorbent hydrogels enhance crop and water productivity <strong>of</strong><br />
soybean–wheat system in Indo-Gangetic plains <strong>of</strong> India. Scientific Reports, 12:11955.<br />
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-16049-x<br />
10 | Page Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Rajanna, G.A., Pathanjali, N., Singh, A., Manna, S., Dass, A. and Singh, V.K. 2021. Seed<br />
treatment and slurry application <strong>of</strong> hydrogels enhances wheat yields under soybeanwheat<br />
system. (In) <strong>Extended</strong> Summaries: 5 th International Agronomy Congress,<br />
November 23-27, 2021, India, pp 1042-1043.<br />
Farm Ponds in Semi-Arid Region <strong>of</strong> Maharashtra<br />
Sarita Chemburkar, Taufique Warsi, Ankita Yadav<br />
WOTR’s Centre <strong>of</strong> Resilience Studies (W-CReS), Pune<br />
T1-03O-1133<br />
Groundwater is an important natural resource used across the globe for various purposes, including<br />
household activities, agriculture, industries, and urbanization. Agriculture productivity has always<br />
been largely influenced by water, which directly affects farmer's income and livelihood. Farmers<br />
also face challenges with water scarcity around the world, such as reduced crop production due to<br />
a lack <strong>of</strong> water, and decreased income due to unpredictable rainfall. Due to climate changes, rainfall<br />
distribution is uncertain, which results in lower income due to erratic amounts <strong>of</strong> rain, and farmers<br />
can only grow crops during the rainy season. Farm ponds are becoming an increasingly popular as<br />
a water storage tanks or reservoirs, designed for rainwater harvesting on agricultural land for<br />
irrigation purposes, cattle feed, and fish farming. The Maharashtra State Government, as well as<br />
Central Government, has been promoting Farm Pond through various schemes with the provision<br />
<strong>of</strong> subsidy. Farm ponds are traditional water harvesting structures to capture surface run<strong>of</strong>f and to<br />
utilize this stored rainwater during lean periods for agriculture. Benefits <strong>of</strong> the farm ponds include<br />
improvement in land productivity, supplemental irrigation to crops, reduced water logging in high<br />
rainfall events, and fish culture when sufficient water is available. Observations indicate that<br />
multiple sources <strong>of</strong> water are used to fill the farm ponds, with bore wells and dug wells accounting<br />
for the majority <strong>of</strong> the supply. Thus, for filling the farm ponds, farmers exploit groundwater which<br />
eventually affects the water level <strong>of</strong> the neighboring farmers (non-Farm pond owners). The problem<br />
<strong>of</strong> using farm ponds as a storage tank has imposed a negative impact on surrounding farmers that<br />
leads to inequality among the different sizes <strong>of</strong> landholding <strong>of</strong> farmers. The marginal and small<br />
farmers are suffering the most because they have less capability to invest a large amount <strong>of</strong> money<br />
for individual facilities. The negative externalities mostly impact poor farmers and fail ineffective<br />
agriculture activities. It is important to relook and regularize the policy for proper use and to ensure<br />
groundwater sustainability as epitomized in the current study.<br />
Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance<br />
11 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
T1-04O-1181<br />
Climate Resilience Through Inclusive Water Management Over A Decade:<br />
A Successful Case Study <strong>of</strong> Yelerampura Gram Panchayat, Tumakuru<br />
District, Karnataka<br />
P.R. Ramesh 1 , N. Loganandhan 1 , J. M. Prashanth 1 , Praveen Kumara 1 and D.V.S.<br />
Reddy 2<br />
1 ICAR-Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Hirehalli, Tumakuru-572 168, Karnataka, India<br />
2 ICAR-Agricultural Technology Application Research Institute, Zone-XI, H.A. Farm Post,<br />
Bengaluru-560024, Karnataka, India<br />
Water is one <strong>of</strong> the primary life sources for all the species living on the earth, including the<br />
mankind. It is also one <strong>of</strong> the major constituents for production <strong>of</strong> food, another source <strong>of</strong> life,<br />
on which human beings are dependent. The dry spells affect the productivity <strong>of</strong> crops, due to<br />
non-availability <strong>of</strong> water during the critical stages <strong>of</strong> growth, intensive rainfalls spoil by<br />
instigating flower droppings, deterioration <strong>of</strong> grains in standing crops, crop lodging etc., apart<br />
from another major impairment called soil erosion. As per a study conducted by Santanu<br />
Kumar Bal et.al., (2022) on principal rainfed crops in major dryland regions <strong>of</strong> India, the yield<br />
loss due to impact <strong>of</strong> dry spells was about 75–99% in 24% <strong>of</strong> sorghum, 23% <strong>of</strong> groundnut and<br />
13% <strong>of</strong> pearl millet and it was about 50–74% in 44% <strong>of</strong> cotton, 24% <strong>of</strong> groundnut, 17% <strong>of</strong><br />
maize, 16% each <strong>of</strong> pearl millet & sorghum and 12% <strong>of</strong> pigeon pea growing regions. As per<br />
another study conducted by Yan li et.al., (2019) in the United States, excessive rainfall can<br />
reduce maize yield up to −34% (−17 ± 3% on average), relative to the expected yield from the<br />
long-term trend, comparable to the up to −37% loss by extreme drought (−32 ± 2% on average)<br />
from 1981 to 2016. So, if any one thinks <strong>of</strong> a single solution that would solve this twin-issues,<br />
he cannot forego the key climate resilient interventions like farm ponds, percolation ponds and<br />
simple in-situ moisture conservation practices like trench cum bunding, formation ridges and<br />
furrows, etc. In order to mitigate the above described climate vulnerability, a national level<br />
project was initiated by Indian Council <strong>of</strong> Agricultural Research (ICAR), by the name -<br />
National Innovations in Climate Resilient Agriculture’ (NICRA) in the year, 2010. Planning,<br />
coordination and monitoring <strong>of</strong> the programme at national level is the responsibility <strong>of</strong> ICAR-<br />
Central Research Institute for Dryland Horticulture CRIDA, Hyderabad. At district level, the<br />
selected KVK is responsible for implementing the project at village level through farmer’s<br />
participatory approach. Under this programme, the interventions were focused only to address<br />
climate related constraints for stabilizing the productivity and not general agriculture<br />
development.<br />
12 | Page Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Methodology<br />
Tumakuru is a district with a high occurrence <strong>of</strong> drought with a poor coping mechanism. As<br />
part <strong>of</strong> NICRA, several technologies were introduced at Durgada Nagenahalli village <strong>of</strong><br />
Yelerampura gram panchayat in Tumakuru district, for minimizing the impact <strong>of</strong> dry spells<br />
and drought by leveraging the scientific techniques and application <strong>of</strong> science for enhancing<br />
the productivity <strong>of</strong> dryland farming systems and sustaining livelihoods. Later, Tanganahalli<br />
and Chikkadoddawadi villages <strong>of</strong> same gram panchayat were added.<br />
The average annual rainfall <strong>of</strong> the district is about 697 mm. About 70% <strong>of</strong> the cultivation is<br />
under dry lands, as the irrigated area is only 30%. The resilient technologies were prioritized<br />
in consultation with the farmers. Similarly, the appropriate locations for water harvesting<br />
systems such as check dam, farm ponds, percolation tanks, etc. were identified and<br />
demonstrated. Identification <strong>of</strong> appropriate coping practices and technologies relevant to<br />
address specific climatic vulnerabilities was accomplished through interactions with farmers in<br />
selected villages by KVKs based on participatory rural appraisal (PRA) and focused group<br />
discussions (FGDs). The National Agricultural Research System (NARS) comprising <strong>of</strong> ICAR<br />
and State Agricultural Universities (SAUs) served as the source <strong>of</strong> proven technologies along<br />
with the indigenous technical knowledge (ITK) <strong>of</strong> participating farmers.<br />
Results<br />
The natural resource management (NRM) component <strong>of</strong> the project focused on soil and water<br />
management practise. The soil conservation part <strong>of</strong> the NRM component is very important,<br />
considering the soil erosion status <strong>of</strong> the villages, before initiation <strong>of</strong> the project. The<br />
technologies <strong>of</strong> soil management short listed for adoption are Trench cum bunding, Ploughing<br />
across the slope and formation <strong>of</strong> ridges and furrows. Important resilient practices<br />
demonstrated in the villages D.Nagenahalli and Tanganahalli for soil management are as given<br />
below:<br />
Trench cum bunding: The trench cum bunding technology was adopted in low to medium<br />
slope regions where arable cropping is practiced in the NICRA project. This method served<br />
dual purpose: firstly the bunds built across the slope with appropriate sections arrested soil<br />
erosion and secondly the trenches served as water reservation pits that keep soil moisture intact<br />
for longer duration. About 130 ha area was brought under trench cum bunding involving about<br />
180 farmers. As per the research estimates, in one hectare <strong>of</strong> land around 50,000 litres <strong>of</strong> water<br />
could be harvested in one filling by the trenches dugout. So, this accounts to be about 6.5<br />
million litres <strong>of</strong> water, getting stored in situ in the farmers’ fields during rainfall events.<br />
Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance<br />
13 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Treatment<br />
Ground nut crop yield under trench cum bunding<br />
Seed yield<br />
(Qtl/ha)<br />
Percentage<br />
increase in<br />
yield<br />
Gross<br />
returns<br />
(Rs./ha)<br />
Net returns<br />
(Rs./ha)<br />
Trench cum bunding 15.3<br />
59,670 33,780<br />
27.5<br />
without trench cum bunding 12.0 46,800 22,175<br />
Farmer Sri Nagarajaiah had cultivated Groundnut in his 1 ha farm. The yield <strong>of</strong> Ground nut<br />
with trench cum bunding was 15.30 qt/ha, compared to that <strong>of</strong> Ground nut without trench cum<br />
bunding (12 qt/ha). The yield <strong>of</strong> the Groundnut increased to an extent <strong>of</strong> 27.50 in average. The<br />
farmer benefitted with additional yield <strong>of</strong> 3.30 quintal and an additional income <strong>of</strong> Rs. 11,605/-<br />
Ploughing across slope and formation <strong>of</strong> ridges and furrows: Ploughing across slope<br />
reduces soil surface erosion as well as any risk <strong>of</strong> nutrient mobilization on the soil surface.<br />
Soils cultivated across the slope also hold more water in surface depressions before surface<br />
flow is initiated. The low-cost interventions like ploughing across the slope and cultivation<br />
through ridges and furrows were demonstrated in 15 ha, benefitting 40 farmers and 5 ha,<br />
benefitting 25 farmers, respectively.<br />
Crop<br />
Effect <strong>of</strong> formation <strong>of</strong> ridges and furrows on crops yields and economics<br />
Crop yields<br />
(q/ha)<br />
(Average)<br />
Demo<br />
Local<br />
Economics with R&F (Rs./ha)<br />
(Average)<br />
Gross<br />
Return<br />
Net<br />
Return<br />
Economics without<br />
R&F (Rs./ha)<br />
(Average)<br />
Gross<br />
Return<br />
Net<br />
Return<br />
Red gram BRG-2 5.8 4.3 29,000 13,500 21,500 5,900<br />
Farmer Sri Manjunath had cultivated Groundnut in his 1 ha farm. The yield <strong>of</strong> Redgram with<br />
Ridges and furrows was 5.8 qt/ha, compared to that <strong>of</strong> Redgram without Ridges and furrows<br />
(4.3 qt/ha). The farmer benefitted with an additional income <strong>of</strong> Rs. 7,600/-. The technologies<br />
<strong>of</strong> water conservation and management implemented in the NICRA villages are as follows:<br />
New farm ponds, Check dams, Water storage structures, Desilting and widening <strong>of</strong> catchment<br />
channels, Fixing the leakage <strong>of</strong> community tank, Desilting and widening <strong>of</strong> defunct farm<br />
ponds, Desilting and widening <strong>of</strong> check dams. Considering the importance <strong>of</strong> harvesting water<br />
for critical irrigation for saving crop during drought in the villages, 108 farm ponds have been<br />
created. The total rainwater storage capacity <strong>of</strong> the 108 farm ponds dug during the project<br />
implementation is 30,950 Cu m and it has benefited over 119 farmers. The total water storage<br />
capacity <strong>of</strong> the newly constructed 5 check dams is 6,750 Cu m and has benefited 11 farmers.<br />
The total rainwater storage capacity <strong>of</strong> the 13 percolation ponds for underground recharge is<br />
1,750 Cu m and has benefited over 13 farmers. The total water storage capacity <strong>of</strong> the 18<br />
rejuvenated farm ponds is 8,230 Cu m benefited 23 farmers. The total water storage capacity<br />
14 | Page Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
<strong>of</strong> the 11 rejuvenated check dams is 11,210 Cu m and benefited 20 farmers. The total rainwater<br />
storage capacity <strong>of</strong> the 3 rejuvenated community tanks is 5,500 Cu m and has benefited 12<br />
farmers. The total water storage capacity <strong>of</strong> the renovation <strong>of</strong> community tanks is 3,68,040 Cu<br />
m and benefited 63 farmers. The overall water storage capacity <strong>of</strong> water harvesting structures<br />
is 4,28,890 Cu m. Seventeen out <strong>of</strong> 32 open wells and 11 out <strong>of</strong> 29 bore wells were recharged<br />
due to water harvesting structures. The water storage capacity <strong>of</strong> the various water harvesting<br />
structures is shown. Around 92.5 ha additional area was brought under protective irrigation by<br />
utilizing harvested water from these structures. Efforts were made to provide access to water<br />
for as many households as possible by way <strong>of</strong> convergence with the ongoing developmental<br />
programmes being taken up in the villages. About 221 households got access to water, thus<br />
farmers in the NICRA can now save the crops during the dry spells by way <strong>of</strong> critical irrigation<br />
and can enhance area under cropping during good rainfall years during Rabi with harvested<br />
water, thus stabilized productivity during drought years and enhanced income by way <strong>of</strong><br />
cropping intensification during normal years.<br />
Details <strong>of</strong> rainwater harvesting structures and their capacity, constructed in NICRA<br />
villages <strong>of</strong> Yelleramapura gram panchayat<br />
Water conservation<br />
structures<br />
No. <strong>of</strong><br />
Units<br />
No. <strong>of</strong><br />
farmers<br />
Water Storage Capacity<br />
(Cu m)<br />
Protective<br />
irrigation<br />
(ha)<br />
New farm ponds 108 119 30950 58<br />
Percolation ponds 13 13 1750 -<br />
New check dams 05 11 6750 1.5<br />
Water storage structures 05 05 1960 03<br />
Rejuvenation <strong>of</strong> farm<br />
ponds<br />
Rejuvenation <strong>of</strong> check<br />
dams<br />
Rejuvenation <strong>of</strong><br />
community tanks<br />
18 23 8230 06<br />
11 20 11210 7<br />
05 63 368040 17<br />
Total 428890 92.5<br />
Check dam helps in ground water recharge <strong>of</strong> the area. Around five check dams were<br />
constructed in the D. Nagenahalli village. The water storage capacity developed is 6,570 cu m<br />
in total. Around 11 farmers benefited due to this intervention. In one <strong>of</strong> the success stories<br />
considered for this study, farmer Sri Chandranna who benefitted from one check dam <strong>of</strong> size<br />
40 m x 50 m x 3 m. He used to cultivate only Finger millet and Maize earlier in two acre farm<br />
during monsoon. After the construction <strong>of</strong> check dam under the NICRA project, he took up<br />
Ragi, Maize and Brinjal in the year 2021-22, in 0.5-acre land, supported by the check dam<br />
Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance<br />
15 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
water <strong>of</strong> 6,000 cu m capacity. The yield <strong>of</strong> Brinjal was 97.8 quintal that provided an income <strong>of</strong><br />
Rs.92,690, owing to the supplemental irrigation from this check dam.<br />
Details <strong>of</strong> impact <strong>of</strong> check dam constructed in Sri Chandranna’s farm<br />
Crop Variety Area<br />
(acre)<br />
Before NICRA<br />
Yield<br />
Gross Cost<br />
(Rs.)<br />
Gross benefit<br />
(Rs.)<br />
Net benefit<br />
(Rs.)<br />
Finger Millet Local 1.0 6 q 2,100 7,500 5,400<br />
Maize Local 1.0 15q 9,200 18,000 8,800<br />
Total 11300 25500 14200<br />
After NICRA<br />
Finger Millet ML365 1.0 12 q 9,050 30,000 20,950<br />
Maize MAH-14-5 0.5 9 q 4,700 10,800 6,100<br />
Brinjal Arka Shirish 0.5 97.8 q 19,780 1,12,470 92,690<br />
Conclusion<br />
Total 33,530 1,53,270 1,19,740<br />
Conservation <strong>of</strong> rainfall water and its judicious use <strong>of</strong> it is the primary activity in combating<br />
the climate variability in vulnerable village. Even the soil conservation related interventions<br />
like trench cum bunding and cultivation <strong>of</strong> crops in ridges and furrows are also recommended<br />
in the farmers’ fields with a sole motive <strong>of</strong> in situ conservation <strong>of</strong> rain water. The interventions<br />
carried out in Yelerampura gram panchayat under NICRA project were well received not only<br />
by the farmers <strong>of</strong> that panchayat but also other government <strong>of</strong>ficers and law makers. Various<br />
promotional efforts taken by the KVK team in the last one decade resulted in adoption <strong>of</strong><br />
similar measures in other parts <strong>of</strong> the district. Recognizing the interventions by the KVK, in<br />
the area <strong>of</strong> water conservation for achieving climate resilience in agriculture, National Water<br />
Award-2020 was bestowed on the Yelerampura gram panchayat by the Ministry <strong>of</strong> Jal Shakti<br />
in March 2021.<br />
References<br />
Santanu Kumar Bal, VM Sandeep, P Vijay Kumar, AVM. Subba Rao, VP Pramod, N<br />
Manikandan, Ch. Srinivasa Rao, Naveen P Singh, S Bhaskar. 2022. Assessing impact<br />
<strong>of</strong> dry spells on the principal rainfed crops in major dryland regions <strong>of</strong> India.<br />
Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, Volume 313.<br />
Yan li, Kaiyu Guan, Gary D. Schnitkey, Evan DeLucia and Big Peng. 2019. Excessive rainfall<br />
leads to maize yield loss <strong>of</strong> a comparable magnitude to extreme drought in the United<br />
States. Global Change Biology, 25(7): 2325-2337.<br />
16 | Page Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
T1-05O-1189<br />
Resilience Through Water Conservation and Adoption <strong>of</strong> Drought<br />
Tolerant Crop Variety in NICRA Village Gunia, Gumla, Jharkhand<br />
Sanjay Kumar 1 , Atal Bihari Tiwari 1 , Anjani Kumar Singh 2 , Amrendra<br />
Kumar 2 and 1 Subhayan Das<br />
1 Krishi Vigyan Kendra Gumla, Jharkhand 83523, India<br />
2 Director ICAR-ATARI Patna, Zone-IV, Patna-801 506, Bihar<br />
Climate change and global warming impacts all sectors <strong>of</strong> human life and agriculture is<br />
particularly vulnerable to it. Increase in atmospheric and surface temperatures leads directly to<br />
increase in evaporation rates <strong>of</strong> water at the earth’s surface. These factors leads to more<br />
vigorous hydrology cycle, influencing precipitation amounts, Intensities, frequencies and<br />
extreme. Keeping the major vulnerability viz. water stress and crop failure, in the centre KVK<br />
Gumla implemented the NICRA project in severely affected (Low rainfall) village <strong>of</strong> Gunia <strong>of</strong><br />
Ghaghra block since 2010-11. Under the project focus was given on water management and<br />
crop production. And accordingly, strategic plan viz. community involvement especially for<br />
water conservation and effective utilization, involvement <strong>of</strong> policy makers, departmental<br />
convergence and promotion <strong>of</strong> drought tolerant resilient crop varieties were taken as a major<br />
tools in mitigation <strong>of</strong> water stress/ scarcity and enhancement in adoption <strong>of</strong> resilient crop<br />
varieties. As a result farmers <strong>of</strong> the adopted village succeeded in storage <strong>of</strong> good volume <strong>of</strong><br />
water in created/ developed structure and harvested good crop yield. Through water<br />
management and adoption <strong>of</strong> resilient crop varieties, resiliency developed against the<br />
vulnerability. And in the village, resilient measures taken under NICRA project have left the<br />
significant impact in the district.<br />
Methodology<br />
The goal <strong>of</strong> technology demonstration component under NICRA is to maintain some <strong>of</strong> the<br />
successful practices and technologies that promote resilience to climate risks. And accordingly<br />
the strategic plan was formulated for successful implementation <strong>of</strong> the intervention with an<br />
objective to conserve and harvest the rain and flowing water to ensure crop production and<br />
cope with water stress vulnerabilities. Although NICRA adopted area receive about 1100 mm<br />
rainfall annually. There was a high degree variation in the spatial and temporal distribution<br />
rendering the farming community vulnerable. There was no proper water storage/ harvesting<br />
structure that can support agriculture during dry spell and beyond kharif season. After assessing<br />
the problem and for its solution major action was undertaken viz. renovation/ excavation <strong>of</strong><br />
pond, well, canal and development <strong>of</strong> Sand bag check dam (Bora-Bandh) for whom community<br />
involvement was ensured. And impression <strong>of</strong> intervention on the mindset <strong>of</strong> villagers and other<br />
Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance<br />
17 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
villagers was so strong that they also started mobilizing themselves to adopt it for crop<br />
production and diversification against the vulnerabilities.<br />
Results<br />
Resilient intervention viz. Water conservation/ Harvesting, Renovation, Parapet construction,<br />
Canal cleaning and sand bag check dam resulted in providing lifesaving irrigation during water<br />
stress condition, increased area under double or multiple crop, enhanced cropping intensity,<br />
increased crop productivity, increased ground water level, increase water storage capacity and<br />
water level rise by 7 to 10 feet.<br />
Climate resilient crop varieties were found as one <strong>of</strong> the most important technological factor<br />
for ensuring the better crop harvest and income. Results <strong>of</strong> the findings clearly show that<br />
improved and tolerant crop varieties along with the proper crop management practices can<br />
enhance the coping ability through risk reduction in vulnerable environment. Ensuring the<br />
availability <strong>of</strong> the resilient varieties in various crops at the appropriate time to the farmers is an<br />
important challenge to address climate vulnerabilities. Under the NICRA project focus was<br />
given to identify the suitable resilient major crop varieties for up scaling in the district.<br />
Details <strong>of</strong> water harvesting structures<br />
Unit<br />
No.<br />
Structure<br />
Name<br />
Dimension (in meter)<br />
Storage<br />
Capacity<br />
(m 3 )<br />
Net utilized<br />
water (m 3 )<br />
Area Covered<br />
(ha)<br />
Before After Before After Before After Before After<br />
Storage<br />
capacity<br />
increase<br />
d (%)<br />
2<br />
Community<br />
Pond<br />
35x40x2.5 36.5x41x3 6420 8025 3210 4815 32 48 50.00<br />
2 Pond - 30.5x36.5x3 - 5200 - 3104 - 31 100.00<br />
1 Pond 28.6x28.9x2.1 30.5x30.5x3 1440 2831 792 1700 08 17 112.50<br />
1 Pond 38.7x35x2.1 39.5x36.5x2.5 2323 3207 1287 1934 12 19 58.33<br />
1 Pond<br />
82.2x71.6x2.1<br />
91.5x76.2x2.5<br />
1200<br />
0<br />
1625<br />
0<br />
4920 7313 49 73 48.98<br />
25 Dova - 7.6x6x3 -- 2500 -- 2000 -- 20 100.00<br />
03 Pond - 15.2x15.2x3 -- 1200 -- 1000 -- 9 100.00<br />
Total<br />
- 35<br />
-<br />
2228<br />
1<br />
3891<br />
3<br />
1020<br />
9<br />
2816<br />
6<br />
101 217<br />
18 | Page Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
1E+10<br />
9E+09<br />
8E+09<br />
7E+09<br />
6E+09<br />
5E+09<br />
4E+09<br />
3E+09<br />
2E+09<br />
1E+09<br />
0<br />
Sarita<br />
Storage<br />
capacity (m 3 )<br />
sarita.che<br />
mburkar@<br />
wotr.org.in<br />
Impact <strong>of</strong> water storage structure<br />
91<br />
Net UtilizedWater<br />
(m 3 )<br />
Others<br />
Indian<br />
Impact <strong>of</strong> water storage structure<br />
NGO<br />
Area Covered<br />
(in ha)<br />
Area in ha<br />
Extent <strong>of</strong> Adoption in NICRA Village<br />
500<br />
400<br />
300<br />
200<br />
100<br />
0<br />
2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21<br />
Rice var.- Lalat<br />
Rice var.- Anjali<br />
Rice var.- Sahbhagi Dhan<br />
Ragi var.- GPU-28<br />
120<br />
100<br />
Area in ha<br />
80<br />
60<br />
40<br />
20<br />
0<br />
Extent <strong>of</strong> Adoption in NICRA Village<br />
2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21<br />
Blackgram var.- PU-30<br />
Niger var.- Birsa Niger-3<br />
Wheat var.- K-9107<br />
Mustard var.- PM-30<br />
50<br />
Productivity trend<br />
50<br />
Productivity trend<br />
Productivity in q<br />
40<br />
30<br />
20<br />
10<br />
0<br />
2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21<br />
Lalat Anjali Sahbhagi Dhan<br />
Productivity in q<br />
40<br />
30<br />
20<br />
10<br />
0<br />
2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21<br />
PU-30 Birsa Niger-3 K-9107 PM-30<br />
Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance<br />
19 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Conclusion<br />
Location specific conservation technologies, water conservation and their efficient<br />
management and adoption strategies as well as enabling policies on crop insurance along with<br />
robust early warning system, weather-based advisories will further facilitates enhancing the<br />
resilience <strong>of</strong> Indian agriculture to climate change and climate variability. The need for stress<br />
short duration and drought tolerant varieties has become paramount in the present context <strong>of</strong><br />
climate change, apart from various adaptation and mitigation strategies to feed the everincreasing<br />
population. These stress tolerant cultivators can play an important role in coping<br />
with climate variability as well as enhancing the productivity and farmers income.<br />
T1-05aO-1375<br />
Transforming Agriculture through Hydroponics: An Innovative Water<br />
Efficient Technology for Rainfed Areas<br />
Ankur Agarwal* and Devkanta P. Singh<br />
Defence Institute <strong>of</strong> Bio-Energy Research (DIBER), DRDO, Haldwani,<br />
Distt Nainital, P.O. Arjunpur, Uttarakhand- 263139, India<br />
*ankurdr@rediffmail.com<br />
The challenge to agriculture in the coming decades is to provide safe food to the ever-growing<br />
population without destroying natural resources. Himalayan states <strong>of</strong> India have a key role in<br />
biodiversity conservation, but these states are also going through the problem <strong>of</strong> decreasing<br />
share <strong>of</strong> agricultural livelihood and a rapidly increasing problem <strong>of</strong> migration from border<br />
villages. Among the various factors reported for migration, few important are depleting<br />
productivity from agriculture due to changing climatic conditions, problem <strong>of</strong> wild animals and<br />
search for better livelihood opportunities. Hence, measures are required to increase the<br />
livelihood opportunities in these border areas to curb the problem <strong>of</strong> migration through<br />
intervention <strong>of</strong> modern technologies. Among these technologies, soil-less cultivation<br />
(hydroponics) have shown potential for sustainable agriculture in varying environments. Most<br />
<strong>of</strong> the time due to topographical challenges, it is not possible to codon the farm area with<br />
fencing and thus make it vulnerable to attack by stray and grazing animals vis-à-vis wild<br />
animals. Secondly, possibility <strong>of</strong> vertical farming allows farming in a compact area with<br />
substantial water saving due to reuse and recycling and hence dependency on rain can be<br />
minimized for farming. Another important feature this technology has <strong>of</strong>fered is production <strong>of</strong><br />
safe fresh food without residual toxicity. Defence Institute <strong>of</strong> Bio-Energy Research (DIBER),<br />
DRDO has successfully standardized and customized technology <strong>of</strong> cultivation <strong>of</strong> multiple<br />
vegetable crops viz., leafy vegetables (lettuce, spinach, coriander, parsley, pakchoy, oregano,<br />
lahi); fruit vegetables (tomato, cucumber, brinjal, capsicum, broccoli, strawberry, bitter gourd,<br />
sponge gourd, etc) and root vegetables (beetroot, turnip, and radish) under single nutrient<br />
20 | Page Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
solution. This customized hydroponics technology allows the cultivation <strong>of</strong> more than 10<br />
vegetables simultaneously under a single nutrient system thereby ensuring year-round<br />
vegetable cultivation with a higher yield. In comparison to conventional agriculture,<br />
hydroponics technology allows vertical utilization <strong>of</strong> space, water saving to the tune <strong>of</strong> 80%,<br />
and near-to-zero use <strong>of</strong> pesticides and weedicides, thus ensuring no residual toxicity. This<br />
technology also makes it possible to use collected rain water as the requirement for water is<br />
low. The entire system is low cost, low maintenance and environment friendly. The institute<br />
has also developed a suitable nutrient composition suitable for wide range <strong>of</strong> vegetables. The<br />
article deals with the hydroponics technology in detail vis-à-vis efforts made at DIBER for<br />
standardization <strong>of</strong> hydroponics technology.<br />
T1-05bO-1161<br />
Enhancing Water Productivity in Rainfed Agriculture through in-situ and ex-situ Rain<br />
Water Harvesting- NICRA Experiences<br />
B.V. Asewar and M.S.Pendke<br />
Department <strong>of</strong> Agronomy, Vasantrao Naik Marathwada Krishi Vidyapeeth, Parbhani 431402<br />
In Marathwada region, out total cultivated area <strong>of</strong> 57.94 lakh ha, 49.60 lakh ha area is rainfed.<br />
The impact <strong>of</strong> climate change and variability in the country on agricultural production is quite<br />
evident in the recent years. The weather aberrations like drought and floods, extreme events<br />
like high intense rainfall, hail storms, heat wave, cold wave etc, are recurrent in most parts <strong>of</strong><br />
the country during the crop growing periods. The South-West monsoon account for nearly 75%<br />
<strong>of</strong> the precipitation received in the country and exerts a strong influence on the kharif food<br />
grain production and the economy in terms <strong>of</strong> agricultural output, farmers income and price<br />
stability. The onset <strong>of</strong> South west monsoon, the amount <strong>of</strong> rainfall and its distribution are<br />
crucial factors which influence the performance <strong>of</strong> agriculture. The probability <strong>of</strong> erratic<br />
monsoon rains is about 40% which implies that 4 out <strong>of</strong> 10 years there would be an adverse<br />
impact on the crop production. There is need to develop appropriate strategies to deal with such<br />
eventualities. Many contingency plans are available at different scales. However, any<br />
contingency intervention either technology related (land, water, soil, crop) or institutional and<br />
policy based, which are implemented on a real time basis in any crop growing season<br />
considered as “Real Time Contingency Plan” is the need <strong>of</strong> hour to stabilize crop stands,<br />
production and income in rainfed regions. Marathwada region comprising <strong>of</strong> eight districts<br />
(Aurangabad, Beed, Hingoli, Jalna, Latur, Nanded, Osmanabad and Parbhani) is traditionally<br />
a drought-prone region. The region receives annual rainfall in the range <strong>of</strong> 500 to 1100 mm<br />
and comes under assured rainfall zone (60%), moderately high rainfall zone (20%) and scarcity<br />
zone (20%). The soils in the region are deep black and medium black. Major kharif crops <strong>of</strong><br />
the region are cotton, soybean, pigeon pea, sorghum, green gram black gram, and pearl millet,<br />
whereas major rabi rainfed crops are rabi sorghum, safflower and chickpea. Rainfall is the key<br />
Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance<br />
21 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
variable influencing crop productivity in rainfed farming. Intermittent and prolonged drought<br />
are the major cause <strong>of</strong> yield reduction in most <strong>of</strong> the crops. Based on the farmers need, technical<br />
interventions were taken up under NICRA (National Innovations in Climate Resilient<br />
Agriculture) action research project through preparedness and real time contingency measures.<br />
Methodology<br />
In-situ moisture conservation through conservation furrow in sole soybean and soybean<br />
+ pigeonpea (4:2): Before introduction <strong>of</strong> this project, the farmers were cultivating sole<br />
soybean crop on flat bed without opening <strong>of</strong> conservation furrow. However yield reductions<br />
were observed due to moisture stress during dryspells . Under improved practice, opening <strong>of</strong><br />
conservation furrow after every 4 rows in sole soybean and soybean + pigeon pea (4:2)<br />
intercropping after 30 to 35 days <strong>of</strong> sowing was adopted as a strategy for moisture conservation<br />
on farmers field during 2011-2015.<br />
Soybean + pigeonpea (4:2) intercropping system: Traditionally, farmers were cultivating<br />
soybean crop as sole crop which is very sensitive to moisture stress as well as excess moisture.<br />
The drastic yield reductions were observed due to dryspells. Under such circumstances soybean<br />
+ pigeonpea (4:2) intercropping system was introduced and adopted on farmers field during<br />
2011- 2015.<br />
In-situ moisture conservation through broad bed & furrow (BBF) in soybean:<br />
Performance <strong>of</strong> BBF technique for sowing <strong>of</strong> soybean on farmers field was evaluated during<br />
2014-15 to 2016-17.<br />
Results<br />
Adoption <strong>of</strong> conservation furrow technique: The effect <strong>of</strong> in-situ moisture conservation<br />
practice like conservation furrow in sole soybean on crop productivity (yield), net monetary<br />
returns, BC ratio and RWUE was analyzed.<br />
Effect <strong>of</strong> conservation furrow on crop productivity, NMR, BC ratio and RWUE<br />
Intervention/Year 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Mean<br />
Yield<br />
(kg/ha)<br />
Conservation<br />
furrow in Soybean<br />
1850 2620 1750 668 632 1504<br />
No furrow 1424 2146 1506 446 487 1202<br />
Net<br />
returns<br />
(kg/ha)<br />
Conservation<br />
furrow in Soybean<br />
21017 30723 41250 10844 3024 22571<br />
No furrow 16177 21546 32710 7240 5374 18609<br />
B:C<br />
ratio<br />
Conservation<br />
furrow in Soybean<br />
1.52 2.53 3.06 2.02 1.61 2.14<br />
22 | Page Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
No furrow 1.16 2.07 2.63 1.34 1.42 1.72<br />
RWUE<br />
(kg/hamm)<br />
Conservation<br />
furrow in Soybean<br />
4.14 5.50 1.78 2.36 2.21 3.19<br />
No furrow 3.19 4.5 1.53 1.58 1.7 2.50<br />
Results indicated that, with conservation furrow, a sole soybean yield <strong>of</strong> 1504 kg/ha was<br />
obtained with a yield advantage <strong>of</strong> 302 kg/ha over the treatment <strong>of</strong> no conservation furrow<br />
(1202 kg/ha). The net returns <strong>of</strong> Rs. 22571/ha was obtained due to adoption <strong>of</strong> conservation<br />
furrow technique and found to be higher than the net return <strong>of</strong> Rs. 18609 in no furrow system.<br />
The BC ratio under adoption <strong>of</strong> conservation furrow technique was found to be 2.14 as against<br />
BC ratio <strong>of</strong> 1.72 with no furrow system. Similarly, the RWUE <strong>of</strong> 3.19 was found with<br />
conservation furrow as compared to RWUE <strong>of</strong> 2.50 in no furrow system. The effect <strong>of</strong> in-situ<br />
moisture conservation practice like conservation furrow in sole soybean on crop productivity<br />
(yield), net monetary returns, BC ratio and RWUE was analyzed and the data is presented.<br />
Effect <strong>of</strong> conservation furrow on crop productivity, NMR, BC ratio and RWUE<br />
Yield<br />
(kg/ha)<br />
Net<br />
returns<br />
(kg/ha)<br />
B:C<br />
ratio<br />
Intervention/Year 2011-<br />
12<br />
Conservation furrow in<br />
Soy + PP (4:2)<br />
2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 Mean<br />
2900 1496 1610 513 1731 1650<br />
No furrow 1875 1160 1205 272 1430 1188<br />
Conservation furrow in<br />
Soy + PP (4:2)<br />
38840 38848 43180 16572 19840 31456<br />
No furrow 18750 26080 27790 8786 16390 19559<br />
Conservation furrow in<br />
Soy + PP (4:2)<br />
3.15 3.16 3.39 2.24 1.62 2.71<br />
RWUE<br />
(kg/hamm)<br />
No furrow 2.04 2.44 2.54 1.18 1.33 1.90<br />
Conservation furrow in<br />
Soy + PP (4:2)<br />
6.50 3.14 1.63 1.81 6.07 3.83<br />
No furrow 4.20 2.43 1.22 0.96 5.01 2.76<br />
In soybean + pigeonpea (4:2) intercropping system, an additional soybean equivalent yield <strong>of</strong><br />
462 kg/ha was obtained with adoption <strong>of</strong> conservation furrow technique as compared to no<br />
furrow with net monetary benefit <strong>of</strong> Rs. 11897/ha. The increase in yield and net return is due<br />
to 30 per cent more moisture conservation resulted in better crop growth and crop performance<br />
even during dry spells.<br />
Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance<br />
23 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Climate Resilient Technology: intercropping system: The effect <strong>of</strong> intercropping system as<br />
compared to sole crop under climatic variations over a period <strong>of</strong> years on crop productivity<br />
(yield), net monetary returns, BC ratio and RWUE was analyzed and the data is presented.<br />
Effect <strong>of</strong> intercropping on crop productivity, NMR, BC ratio and RWUE<br />
Year 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 Mean<br />
Yield<br />
(kg/ha)<br />
Net<br />
returns<br />
(kg/ha)<br />
B:C<br />
ratio<br />
RWUE<br />
(kg/hamm)<br />
Soybean +<br />
Pigeonpea (4:2)<br />
Intercropping<br />
system<br />
2464 2859 2443 1340 1731 2167<br />
Sole Soybean 1577 2251 1790 446 527 1318<br />
Soybean +<br />
Pigeonpea (4:2)<br />
Intercropping<br />
system<br />
31715 50623 61132 20164 19840 36695<br />
Sole Soybean 26494 39857 44791 6711 6040 24778<br />
Soybean +<br />
Pigeonpea (4:2)<br />
Intercropping<br />
system<br />
1.98 1.64 3.5 1.59 1.62 2.06<br />
Sole Soybean 1.44 1.29 2.56 0.52 0.49 1.26<br />
Soybean +<br />
Pigeonpea (4:2)<br />
Intercropping<br />
system<br />
5.52 6.0 2.58 4.74 6.07 4.98<br />
Sole Soybean 3.53 4.72 1.89 1.58 1.85 2.71<br />
Soybean + Pigeonpea (4:2) intercropping system recorded significantly higher soybean<br />
equivalent mean yield <strong>of</strong> 2167 kg/ha as against the sole soybean mean yield <strong>of</strong> 1318 kg/ha i.e.<br />
farmers practice over a period <strong>of</strong> five years. The mean net returns in soybean + pigeonpea<br />
intercropping system was recorded as Rs. 36695/ha as against mean sole soybean net return <strong>of</strong><br />
Rs. 24778/ha in farmers practice. The BC ratio and RWUE was also higher in soybean:<br />
pigeonpea intercropping system as compared to sole soybean crop. During 2014 and 2015,<br />
despite <strong>of</strong> more than 50% deficit rainfall, the intercropping system sustained even in prolonged<br />
dryspell during 2015. The dryspell was occurred at flowering and pod filling stage <strong>of</strong> soybean<br />
and vegetative stage in pigeonpea.<br />
In-situ moisture conservation through broad bed & furrow (BBF) in soybean: The data<br />
on. crop yield, net return, BC ratio and RWUE under BBF technology as compared to farmers<br />
practice is presented.<br />
24 | Page Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Comparison <strong>of</strong> BBF technique with farmers practice for soybean<br />
Soil type Intervention Mean<br />
Seed<br />
yield kg/<br />
ha<br />
Light to<br />
medium<br />
black<br />
soil<br />
Stover<br />
yield<br />
/ha<br />
kg<br />
Net returns,<br />
Rs./ha<br />
BC ratio<br />
RWUE,<br />
kg/ha-mm<br />
BBF 1337 1847 19733 1.62 2.166<br />
Farmers<br />
practice<br />
1122 1433 14384 1.46 1.79<br />
Above table indicated that due to use <strong>of</strong> BBF technology, the yield increase was recorded.<br />
Similarly, the net returns, BC ratio and RWUE was found to be higher in BBF technique as<br />
compared to farmers practice. This BBF technique was proved as climate resilient technique<br />
under changing climate.<br />
Well and bore well recharging model: An Experience in NICRA Village A National<br />
Innovations on Climate Resilient Agriculture (NICRA) project in being implemented on<br />
farmers field at village Babhulgaon Tq.Dist.Parbhani. Open well and bore well recharge<br />
technology was demonstrated on 10 and 7 farmers field through participatory mode<br />
respectively. The pre-& post monsoon water levels in the wells were monitored. Also, the<br />
aquifer characteristic viz. transmissivity and specific yield were determined. Accordingly, the<br />
ground water recharge was determined. The Recharge wells recorded higher ground water<br />
potential as compared to un-recharged wells.<br />
Conclusion<br />
Preparedness like adoption <strong>of</strong> climate resilient crops and varieties, adoption <strong>of</strong> in-situ and exsitu<br />
moisture conservation techniques i.e. Broad bed furrow sowing method, conservation<br />
furrow, farm pond, recharging <strong>of</strong> well and bore wells and intercropping system plays a crucial<br />
role in dryland agriculture for sustaining crop productivity. The Broad Bed and Furrow sowing<br />
technique (BBF) was found to be most efficient climate resilient technology under variable<br />
climatic conditions over a period <strong>of</strong> 5 years with respect to yield enhancement and thereby the<br />
increased net returns. Also, BBF technique resulted in more moisture conservation as reflected<br />
by mean soil moisture status.<br />
References<br />
Ramchandraapa B.K., M.N. Thimmegowda, A. Satish, B.N. Jagadeesh, K. Devaraja, P.N.,<br />
Srikanth Babu, M.S. Sativa 2016. Real time contingency measures to cope with rainfall<br />
variability in southern Karnataka. Indian Journal <strong>of</strong> Dryland Agricultural Research and<br />
Development 31(1): 37-43.<br />
Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance<br />
25 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
T1-06R-1005<br />
Enhancement <strong>of</strong> Rainfed Cotton Production Through Supplemental<br />
Irrigation in Vertisols Tract <strong>of</strong> Southern Tamil Nadu<br />
M. Manikandan* 1 , S. Manoharan 1 , K. Baskar 1 , V. Sanjivkumar 1 , G. Guru 1 and<br />
G. Ravindra Chary 2<br />
1 AICRP for Dryland Agriculture, Kovilpatti Main Centre, ARS, TNAU, Kovilpatti – 628 501<br />
2 ICAR- Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, Hyderabad-500 059, Telangana<br />
* manikandan.m@tnau.ac.in<br />
Rainwater harvesting through farm ponds in the rainfed areas is one <strong>of</strong> the most promising<br />
technology for enhancing crop productivity. Farm ponds would help the farmers to use stored<br />
water for managing the dry spells during the season. Studies have revealed that providing SI<br />
during dry periods at different stages <strong>of</strong> crop growth has improved the yields by 29 to 114 per<br />
cent for different crops. SI not only increases the yield but also improves water productivity<br />
when SI and rainwater are used conjunctively. Though sufficient records are available for SI<br />
as an effective practice to alleviate dry spell effects, some challenges <strong>of</strong> SI are to plan the timing<br />
and depth <strong>of</strong> water to be applied and the practical feasibility <strong>of</strong> storing and retaining water till<br />
the period when crops needed despite heavy seepage and evaporation losses (Oweis and<br />
Hachum, 2012). This study aims to assess the feasibility <strong>of</strong> using the farm pond water for giving<br />
supplemental irrigation to rabi cotton, particularly for farmers having small size land holdings<br />
in the rainfed areas.<br />
Methodology<br />
This research was conducted in AICRPDA Kovilpatti main centre at Agricultural Research<br />
Station, Kovilpatti, Tamil Nadu in India from 2011 to 2021. Vertisols constitute nearly 70 per<br />
cent <strong>of</strong> the total area. The depth <strong>of</strong> soil varies from 110 to 150 cm and the rate <strong>of</strong> infiltration is<br />
0.9 cm hr -1 . Soil develops typical cracks at least one cm wide and reaches a depth <strong>of</strong> more than<br />
50 cm during the period moisture stress. Annual average rainfall was 711 mm in 42 rainy days,<br />
with respect to seasonal rainfall, the main contribution was from north east monsoon (NEM)<br />
i.e. 393 mm. The experiment was conducted in rainfed cotton with two treatments viz. (i)<br />
providing supplemental irrigation to the crop and (ii) pure rainfed crop. Cotton (KC3) was<br />
grown with a spacing <strong>of</strong> 45 x 15 cm on the ridges, furrows were formed by 45 cm spacing.<br />
Crops were cultivated and all the practices were followed as per the crop production guide <strong>of</strong><br />
Tamil Nadu State. A rectangular shaped farm pond <strong>of</strong> 25 m x 13 m x 1.5 m, lined with random<br />
rubble masonry was used for harvesting run<strong>of</strong>f from a one ha catchment area. A 5 HP diesel<br />
engine was used for pumping water from the pond. One raingun with tripod stand having<br />
discharge rate <strong>of</strong> 3.5 lps and radius <strong>of</strong> throw <strong>of</strong> 20 m was used for sprinkling water. Changes<br />
in water level in the farm pond were observed during the rainy season and run<strong>of</strong>f drained into<br />
26 | Page Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
farm pond was worked out. Since the crops are grown in rainfed regions, there was no irrigation<br />
to the crop other than rainwater, the total rainwater utilized by the crop throughout the crop<br />
season to calculate rainwater use efficiency (RWUE). In case supplemental irrigation, the depth<br />
<strong>of</strong> supplemental irrigation would be added to the cumulative depth <strong>of</strong> rainfall.<br />
Results<br />
Annual rainfall and NEM rainfall, run<strong>of</strong>f causing rainfall, actual run<strong>of</strong>f generated, run<strong>of</strong>f water<br />
harvested in the pond during 2011 to 2021 is presented here.<br />
Year<br />
Run<strong>of</strong>f water generated and rainwater harvested in the farm pond<br />
Rainfall,<br />
mm (rainy<br />
days)<br />
Annual<br />
rainfall<br />
Excess /<br />
Deficit<br />
Rainfall,<br />
mm (rainy<br />
days)<br />
NEM<br />
rainfall<br />
Excess /<br />
Deficit<br />
Run<strong>of</strong>f<br />
causing<br />
rainfall,<br />
mm<br />
Run<strong>of</strong>f,<br />
mm<br />
Water<br />
harvested<br />
in pond, m 3<br />
2011 787.6 (42) 7% Excess 503.4 (22) 26% Excess 244.6 46.5 480<br />
2012 392.9 (23) 46% Deficit 228.3 (14) 42.4% Deficit 81.8 32.6 326<br />
2013 421.3 (28) 42% Deficit 252.8 (17) 35.4 % Deficit 105.8 41.0 409.8<br />
2014 666.8 (48) 7.7% Deficit 301.2 (21) 23 % Deficit 63.6 20.3 215<br />
2015 988.6 (52) 35.3 % Excess 475.8 (21) 21 % Excess 59.4 18.8 188<br />
2016 199.6 (15) 72 % Deficit 80.2 (7) 79.8 % Deficit 0 0 No run<strong>of</strong>f<br />
2017 801.7 (36) 12.3 % Excess 421.4 (17) 6.2 % Excess 282.4 26.8 268<br />
2018 410.6 (34) 42.5 % Deficit 213.9 (19) 46 % Deficit 0 0 No run<strong>of</strong>f<br />
2019 668.1 (46) 5.2 % Deficit 426.4 (28) 9.2 % Excess 108.9 25.8 258<br />
2020 905.6 (47) 29.5 % Excess 473.3 (26) 21.2 % Excess 125.6 27.4 274<br />
2021 914.7 (60) 28.65% Excess 532.3 (29) 33.9 % Excess 151.9 48.0 481<br />
Mean 650.68 (39) 355.36 (20) 111.27 26.11 263.62<br />
Out <strong>of</strong> 11 years, 5 years experienced excess annual and seasonal rainfall ranging from 7 to 35<br />
per cent over normal rainfall. Total water harvested in the farm pond over the study period was<br />
263.6 cubic m. Pond reaches its full capacity <strong>of</strong> 480 m 3 when NEM rainfall is 450 mm. SI was<br />
given when run<strong>of</strong>f water drained into pond was greater than 250 m 3 . Run<strong>of</strong>f coefficient<br />
obtained from rainfall-run<strong>of</strong>f was found to be 0.24.<br />
Ridges and furrows were found to be the most promising in-situ moisture conservation<br />
practices in the catchment area for cotton production. Rainwater harvested from this area was<br />
stored in the farm pond and was used for supplemental irrigation to 0.4 hectares when the dry<br />
spell exceeded 15 days during active crop growth stages. The response <strong>of</strong> SI on yield and<br />
RWUE in rainfed cotton production is presented as follows.<br />
Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance<br />
27 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Response <strong>of</strong> SI on yield and RWUE in rainfed cotton production<br />
Year<br />
NEM<br />
Rainfall<br />
Pure<br />
rainfed<br />
Yield, kg<br />
Pure<br />
rainfed+SI<br />
Increase in<br />
Yield<br />
SI,<br />
mm<br />
RWUE, kg ha -1 mm -1<br />
Pure<br />
rainfed<br />
Pure<br />
rainfed+SI<br />
2011/12 503.4 1515 1730 14.2 50 3.01 3.13<br />
2013/14 252.8 790 820 3.8 44 3.13 2.76<br />
2017/18 421.4 876 987 12.7 25 2.08 2.21<br />
2020/21 473.3 677 793 17.1 50 1.43 1.52<br />
Mean 355.36 964.50 1082.50 11.95 2.41 2.41<br />
Cotton crops responded positively to the SI for all the years. Further, giving supplemental<br />
irrigation was found to produce higher cotton production per unit <strong>of</strong> water than rainfed.<br />
Supplemental irrigation to a total depth <strong>of</strong> 50 mm resulted in 14.2 per cent, 12.7 per cent and<br />
17.1 per cent increased yield in cotton compared to that <strong>of</strong> unirrigated crop during rabi season<br />
<strong>of</strong> 2011-12, 2017-18 and 2020-21 respectively. During 2013-14, the yield difference between<br />
treatments was very less, hence this effect has been reflected in RWUE. The increase in yield<br />
<strong>of</strong> cotton by SI is mainly by the reduction <strong>of</strong> soil moisture stress experienced during the critical<br />
growth stages. Rainfed cotton combined with SI has recorded higher RWUE over pure rainfed<br />
cotton and it ranges from 1.52 to 3.13 kg ha -1 mm -1 .<br />
Conclusion<br />
This study examined the scope <strong>of</strong> supplemental irrigation during the moisture stress period for<br />
cotton production. The run<strong>of</strong>f coefficient obtained was 0.24. Supplemental irrigation from farm<br />
pond to cotton during vegetative, flowering, boll formation stages resulted 12.7 to 17.1 per cent<br />
increased yield. Rainwater combined with SI recorded higher RWUE <strong>of</strong> 1.52 to 3.13 kg ha -1<br />
mm -1 . At farm level run<strong>of</strong>f water harvesting in a pond and reusing harvested water through<br />
supplemental irrigation combined with in-situ rainwater management is a great option with a<br />
higher potential for increasing productivity in rainfed areas.<br />
References<br />
Oweis, T. and Hachum, A., 2012. Supplemental Irrigation—A highly efficient water-use<br />
practice. Aleppo, Syria, 16.<br />
28 | Page Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
T1-07R-1062<br />
Enhancing Climate Resilient Agriculture in Semi-Arid Region through<br />
Group Micro Irrigation by Collectivization and Equitable Sharing <strong>of</strong><br />
Groundwater: Case Study in Maharashtra and Telangana, India<br />
Arun Bhagat*, Upasana Koli, Jyothirmayee Kandula and Marcella Dsouza<br />
WOTR Centre for Resilience Studies (W-CReS), Watershed Organisation Trust (WOTR), Pune<br />
(India)<br />
*arun.bhagat@wotr.org.in<br />
Groundwater is one <strong>of</strong> the primary sources <strong>of</strong> irrigation for food production in many countries<br />
<strong>of</strong> the world, and India, which significantly contributes to the food supply for countries, is the<br />
most groundwater-dependent country on earth. Despite their importance, the resources are<br />
heading for a crisis in many regions, mainly due to their enormous exploitation to increase<br />
production to feed the growing population. Climate change, it is anticipated, will pose an<br />
additional significant threat to groundwater resources in the future (Shahid et al., 2017), and<br />
has affected agricultural practices to the extent that farmers have increased the use <strong>of</strong> synthetic<br />
fertilizers and agrochemicals to protect themselves from the damages. Therefore, looking at<br />
the challenging water scenario, the government has been stressing about increasing the efficient<br />
use <strong>of</strong> water. However, despite the numerous schemes, technological inputs, and new methods<br />
<strong>of</strong> productivity enhancement, it has scarcely addressed the water problem in its entirety. To<br />
address these issues and challenges, Watershed Organisation Trust (WOTR) undertook an<br />
action research project - the Group Micro Irrigation (GMI) approach, devised to enhance<br />
agriculture productivity for a group <strong>of</strong> smallholder farmers with special attention to efficient<br />
water use.<br />
Methodology<br />
Water is considered a common good rather than privately owned in this approach. This<br />
viewpoint is to help manage scarce water resources judiciously and equitably. The GMI<br />
approach comprises four main components: groundwater management on the supply and<br />
demand side, promotion <strong>of</strong> CRA practices, facilitation <strong>of</strong> market linkages, and integration <strong>of</strong><br />
applied research by providing small methods or tools to support farmers. In the first component<br />
<strong>of</strong> GMI, measures such as harvesting rainwater and construction <strong>of</strong> soil and water conservation<br />
structures to recharge groundwater are taken to support the supply side. And to support the<br />
demand side, accumulating private groundwater resources and distributing water through a<br />
common-drip-irrigation system are the measures taken. The second component <strong>of</strong> promoting<br />
Climate Resilient Agriculture (CRA) as a package <strong>of</strong> practices is a measure undertaken to boost<br />
soil health and plant resilience to ensure a harvest in the face <strong>of</strong> weather and environmental<br />
challenges. The third component involves encouraging market linkage through Farmer<br />
Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance<br />
29 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Producer Organisations (FPO), giving access to better prices. And the fourth component is<br />
about integrating applied research to support farmers using simple tools and methods includes<br />
maintaining field books by farmers, crop water budgeting, and assessing groundwater<br />
availability by testing well water depth and pump discharge.<br />
The study was focused on the water scare area <strong>of</strong> Maharashtra and Telangana states. The GMI<br />
model details are given here under.<br />
GMI<br />
Model<br />
Details <strong>of</strong> GMI models developed in Maharashtra and Telangana states<br />
Location<br />
No <strong>of</strong><br />
Farmers<br />
Year <strong>of</strong><br />
estb.<br />
Area<br />
(Acre)<br />
Water Source<br />
GMI-I Tigalkheda, Jalna (MS) 14 2017 32.45 Dugwell (01)<br />
GMI-II Ranmala, Ahmednagar (MS) 06 2020 06 Dugwell (01)<br />
GMI-III Bhangadewadi, Ahmednagar (MS) 47 2020 65.5 Large Farm<br />
Pond<br />
GMI-IV Israipalli, Mahabubnagar (TS) 18 2013 18 Borewells (03)<br />
GMI-V Badunapur, Rangareddy (TS) 6 2016 16.5 Borewells (06)<br />
GMI-VI Rampur, Rangareddy (TS) 9 2016 19.6 Borewells (06)<br />
Results<br />
Asignificant rise is observed in cropped and irrigated areas, cropping intensity, and crop and<br />
water productivity due to GMI intervention.<br />
Impact <strong>of</strong> GMI intervention on cropped and irrigated area, cropping intensity, and crop<br />
and water productivity<br />
Assessment indicator<br />
Average rise in the cropped area (%) 40.01<br />
Average rise in Irrigated area (%) 99.20<br />
Average rise in cropping intensity (%) 67.42<br />
Average rise in crop Productivity (%) 82.86<br />
Average rise in water productivity (%) 77.81<br />
Average change in cropping pattern<br />
Comparison between Pre and Post-intervention<br />
Shifted from grain crops to high-valued crops e.g. vegetable<br />
RULES (BY GROUPS) FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF THE GMI<br />
Water budgeting and crop planning before every season. The selection <strong>of</strong> crops should be the same for all or<br />
with the same harvesting duration based on the water budget decisions<br />
Compulsory use <strong>of</strong> micro-irrigation systems and water-intensive crops are not allowed when water<br />
availability is limited<br />
Follow climate-resilient agricultural practices<br />
A compulsory contribution <strong>of</strong> group funds based on GMI land area for maintenance and repair expenditures<br />
30 | Page Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Conclusion<br />
The assessment revealed that the GMI approach had a significant impact in addressing issues<br />
related to the sustainable use and equitable sharing <strong>of</strong> water resources, and the barriers to<br />
adopting both micro-irrigation and climate-resilient farming practices. At the field level, a rise<br />
in cropping intensity with diversified crops <strong>of</strong> high economic value and increased yield and<br />
water productivity resulted from this approach's effectiveness. Also, it enabled an attitude <strong>of</strong><br />
cooperation rather than competition, helped strengthen interpersonal relationships through<br />
constant and effective coordination, and lowered individual investment. Additionally, it<br />
provided easy access to subsidies and water-efficient technologies like micro-irrigation<br />
systems for those who otherwise could not afford them within the group. It perpetuated risktaking<br />
abilities to indulge in experimenting with varied and advanced agricultural techniques<br />
and technology and provided sufficient bargaining power for their outputs.<br />
References<br />
Shahid, S., Alamgir, M., Wang, X. J., & Eslamian, S. (2017). Climate change impacts on and<br />
adaptation to groundwater. In Handbook <strong>of</strong> Drought and Water Scarcity, pp. 107-124, CRC<br />
Press.<br />
Soil Preferential Flow: A Case Study from Semi-arid Watershed<br />
Pushpanjali, K.S. Reddy, K. Sammi Reddy and Vinod Kumar Singh<br />
ICAR-Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, Hyderabad- 500 059, India<br />
T1-08R-1149<br />
Semi-arid ecosystems are important ecological and economic hotspots that comprise over 40%<br />
(6B ha) <strong>of</strong> the world’s total land surface. In general, a semi-arid landscape is characterized by<br />
shallow soils and large proportions <strong>of</strong> bare rock, both expected to influence infiltration and<br />
groundwater recharge processes considerably. The dynamic soil matrix generally precludes the<br />
use <strong>of</strong> the traditional, deterministic modelling approach to predict flow and transport at the field<br />
scale. Preferential flow is a generic term used for obvious flow paths like biopores, fractures<br />
and macropores whereby water movement through a porous medium follows favoured routes<br />
bypassing other parts <strong>of</strong> the medium (Luxmoore 1991). It was not until the late seventies that<br />
increasing agricultural and environmental concerns created a renewed interest in the subject<br />
(Beven and Germann 2013). Since then, numerous studies have been undertaken to describe,<br />
measure, and model preferential flow. Application <strong>of</strong> geographic information system (GIS) and<br />
image analysis helps reduce field work and traversing and establish relationship between<br />
landform and soil in the watershed and its sub-divisions.<br />
A semi-arid landscape is characterized by shallow soils and large proportions <strong>of</strong> bare rock, both<br />
expected to influence infiltration and groundwater recharge processes considerably. The dynamic<br />
Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance<br />
31 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
soil matrix generally precludes the use <strong>of</strong> the traditional, deterministic modelling approach to<br />
predict flow and transport at the field scale thus it is <strong>of</strong>ten very difficult to estimate solute transport<br />
by a preferential flow. Different methods have been used for evaluating or quantifying the<br />
characteristics <strong>of</strong> macropores and preferential flow. Various researchers found that food-grade dye<br />
Brilliant Blue FCF has been an excellent dye tracer for soil water flow and solute transport owing<br />
to the high-water solubility, limited toxicity, similar transport property to water, low adsorption in<br />
sand soil, and distinct visibility. A better understanding <strong>of</strong> preferential water flow would benefit<br />
for the understanding <strong>of</strong> the ecological and hydrological functions <strong>of</strong> soil. So, the overall goal <strong>of</strong><br />
this study was to investigate the role <strong>of</strong> preferential flow, as affected by different land use, on the<br />
subsurface movement <strong>of</strong> water in a micro-watershed. A micro-watershed at Hayathnagar,<br />
Hyderabad, India, was taken up to generate detailed information on soil preferential flow.<br />
Hayathnagar micro-watershed is situated in Hayathnagar village, Rangareddy district <strong>of</strong> Telangana<br />
lying between 17 ° 20’18.00’’to17 ° 21’8.94” N latitude and 78 ° 35’26.14’’ to 78 ° 36’4.89’’ E<br />
longitudes. The total area <strong>of</strong> the micro-watershed is 154 ha. The area has been divided into 3<br />
units upper-reach, middle and lower-reach. The area under upper-reach is 54 ha, middle-reach is<br />
60 ha and the lower-reach is about 40 ha.<br />
The study shows significant effect <strong>of</strong> preferential flow on the nutrient movement down the pr<strong>of</strong>ile<br />
in the different land-use. At the upper reach, SOC for all the land-use systems was between 0.4 to<br />
0.5% in flow path while in the soil matrix it was found to be between 0.25 to 0.35%, similar results<br />
were observed for middle reach. Soil microbial biomass carbon was 50 to 70 % higher in flow path<br />
than in the soil matrix. These findings lead us to understand that there exist a completely different<br />
channels in the soil letting nutrients and microbes to travel within the horizons in soil.<br />
Upper reach<br />
32 | Page Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Middle reach<br />
Lower reach<br />
Typical soil pr<strong>of</strong>ile under different elevation and land use (upto 30 cm)<br />
Based on preferential flow fraction parameters compared under different elevations, the<br />
preferential flow advantage <strong>of</strong> forest land is more evident than that <strong>of</strong> fallow land. In upper<br />
reach <strong>of</strong> watershed, surface soil mostly has heterogeneous matrix flow and fingering<br />
while subsurface was observed to have more macropores with low interaction. Thus, the<br />
surface soil shows flow instability due to coarse texture and water repellence while subsurface<br />
is poorly permeable soil. Middle and lower reach was heterogeneous matrix flow and fingering<br />
as major flow type in the surface while macropores with mixed interaction in the subsurface<br />
<strong>of</strong> the soil pr<strong>of</strong>ile. While taking watershed as unit to study preferential flow, we found that<br />
different land uses and elevations play an important role in deciding the type <strong>of</strong> preferential<br />
flow which may lead to better management practices <strong>of</strong> respective soils for better water and<br />
crop productivity.<br />
Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance<br />
33 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
References<br />
Beven K and Germann P. 2013 Macropores and water flow in soils revisited. Water<br />
Resources Research, 49:3071-3092.<br />
Luxmoore RJ. 1991. On preferential flow and its measurement (No. CONF-911255-1).<br />
OakRidge National Lab., TN (United States).<br />
T1-09R-1172<br />
Micro-Irrigation Based Supplemental Irrigation Using Harvested<br />
Rainwater for Sustainable Agriculture Under Rainfed Ecosystems<br />
Abrar Yousuf, M.J. Singh, Anil Khokhar, Parminder Singh Sandhu, Mohammad Amin<br />
Bhat, Balwinder Singh Dhillon<br />
Punjab Agricultural University-Regional Research Station, AICRPDA Centre<br />
Ballowal Saunkhri, Balachaur, Punjab-144521, India<br />
The Indian economy is mainly dependent on agriculture which contributes 21% <strong>of</strong> the<br />
country’s capital GDP and 60 percent <strong>of</strong> employment potential. Out <strong>of</strong> the total net sown area<br />
in India, about 51% is under rainfed agriculture, which contributes around 40% <strong>of</strong> the total<br />
food production. The rainfed agriculture is usually at risk as crop security depends on arrival,<br />
distribution and withdrawal <strong>of</strong> rainfall during the monsoon season. Crop failures, taking heavy<br />
toll on farmers’ income, are very common in rainfed ecologies due to the dearth <strong>of</strong> the irrigation<br />
water. In Punjab, rainfed farming is being practiced in lower Shivalik region, locally known as<br />
Kandi area. This region is characterized by erratic distribution <strong>of</strong> rainfall, small landholdings,<br />
lack <strong>of</strong> irrigation facilities, heavy biotic pressure on the natural resources, inadequate<br />
vegetative cover, heavy soil erosion, landslides, declining soil fertility and frequent crop<br />
failures resulting in scarcity <strong>of</strong> food, fodder and fuel (Yousuf et al., 2017).In this region, about<br />
80% <strong>of</strong> total annual rainfall is received from July to September. Though sufficient rainfall is<br />
received to meet the crop water requirement, the crops are subjected to early, mid-season and<br />
terminal droughts leading to crop failures and low yields. To raise the productivity <strong>of</strong> rainfed<br />
crops in the region, it is necessary to harvest the excess rainwater. Rainwater management is<br />
one <strong>of</strong> the most critical components <strong>of</strong> rainfed farming and the successful production <strong>of</strong> crops<br />
largely depends on how efficiently soil moisture is conserved in situ and the surplus run-<strong>of</strong>f is<br />
harvested, stored and reused for supplemental irrigation and also for recharging (Rao et al.,<br />
2017). Farm pond technology is identified as one <strong>of</strong> the most important and cost-effective<br />
technology for management <strong>of</strong> the excess rainwater. The excess rainwater, termed as surface<br />
run<strong>of</strong>f, can be harvested in farm ponds and utilized for supplemental or life-saving irrigation<br />
during dry spells. Keeping this in view, an experiment was conducted to study the effect <strong>of</strong><br />
supplemental irrigation on yield, water use efficiency and economics <strong>of</strong> maize-wheat and<br />
vegetable-based cropping systems.<br />
34 | Page Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Methodology<br />
The study was conducted at the research farm <strong>of</strong> AICRPDA centre Ballowal Saunkhri during<br />
2019-2021.The study area lies in sub-humid subtropical climate having hot summers and cold<br />
winters. The study area receives an average annual rainfall <strong>of</strong> about 1050 mm, out <strong>of</strong> which<br />
80% is received during the monsoon season. The farm pond having a capacity <strong>of</strong> 696 m 3 was<br />
constructed to harvest the excess rainwater. The harvested rainwater was used to provide<br />
supplemental irrigation to maize and okra during kharif and wheat and pea during rabi season.<br />
The supplemental irrigation was applied to maize and okra through furrow irrigation. The<br />
sprinkler irrigation was applied to wheat while drip irrigation was applied to pea. The<br />
experiment was laid in the random block design.<br />
Catchment-storage-command relationship <strong>of</strong> farm pond<br />
Catchment area (ha) 1.8<br />
Storage capacity, m 3 696<br />
Command area, ha 0.5<br />
Catchment-storage Ratio 25.8<br />
Storage command Ratio 0.14<br />
Catchment command Ratio 3.6<br />
Method <strong>of</strong> irrigation<br />
Amount <strong>of</strong> water applied (mm)<br />
Results<br />
Maize, okra and pea: furrow: wheat: sprinkler<br />
Maize and okra: 50 mm, pea 50 mm, wheat: 50 mm<br />
During kharif season, one supplemental irrigation in maize and okra resulted in yield <strong>of</strong> 3758<br />
kg/ha and 126.5 q/ha which was 70.2% and 75.2 % higher over rainfed maize (2208 kg/ha) and<br />
okra (72.2 q/ha), respectively. The water use efficiency increased by about 38.7% and 46.6%<br />
in maize and wheat, respectively due to the application <strong>of</strong> supplemental irrigation. Similarly,<br />
the supplemental irrigation resulted in increased B-C ratio by 60.7% and 62.5% in maize and<br />
okra respectively. During rabi season, one supplemental irrigation to wheat resulted in 65.9%<br />
higher yield over rainfed wheat. While in pea, an increase <strong>of</strong> about 76% was observed in pod<br />
yield over the rainfed pea The water use efficiency increased from 11.25 to 19.67 in wheat, and<br />
6.28 to 14.96 in pea due to the application <strong>of</strong> supplemental irrigation. Similarly, the<br />
supplemental irrigation resulted in increased B:C ratio by 53.5% and 41.1% in wheat and pea,<br />
respectively.<br />
Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance<br />
35 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Effect <strong>of</strong> supplemental irrigation on crop yield, water use efficiency and economics<br />
Crops<br />
With<br />
supplemental<br />
irrigation<br />
Economic yield<br />
(kg ha -1 )<br />
Without<br />
supplemental<br />
irrigation<br />
Water use efficiency<br />
(kg ha -1 mm -1 )<br />
With<br />
supplemental<br />
irrigation<br />
Without<br />
supplemental<br />
irrigation<br />
With<br />
supplemental<br />
irrigation<br />
B:C<br />
Without<br />
supplemental<br />
irrigation<br />
WSI WOSI WSI WOSI WSI WOSI<br />
Maize 3758 2208 5.34 3.85 2.09 1.30<br />
Okra 12654 7224 18.47 12.60 2.47 1.52<br />
Wheat 3448 2078 19.67 11.25 2.41 1.57<br />
Pea 3288 1869 14.96 6.28 1.75 1.24<br />
Conclusions<br />
Farm pond is a farmer friendly option for rainwater harvesting toprovide life-saving irrigation<br />
to standing crops when theyare exposed to mid-term/terminal drought and also forpre-sowing<br />
irrigation in post-rainy crops in rainfed areas.The application <strong>of</strong> supplemental irrigation<br />
resulted in increased yield, WUE and B-C ratio in both kharif and rabi crops.<br />
References<br />
Rao, C.S., Rejani, R., Rao, C.A., Rao, K.V., Osman, M., Reddy, K.S., Kumar, M and Kumar<br />
P. 2017. Farm ponds for climate-resilient rainfed agriculture. Curr. Sci., 112:471-477.<br />
Yousuf, A., Bhardwaj, A., Tiwari, A.K and Bhatt, V.K., 2017. Simulation <strong>of</strong> run<strong>of</strong>f and<br />
sediment yield from a forest micro watershed in Shivalik foothills using WEPP Model.<br />
Indian J. Soil Conserv., 45:21–27.<br />
T1-10R-1382<br />
Increasing the Productivity <strong>of</strong> Rainfed Rice-Based Double Cropping<br />
System Through Supplemental Irrigation Under Medium Lowland<br />
Situation <strong>of</strong> North Bank Plains Zone (NBPZ) <strong>of</strong> Assam<br />
Arunjyoti Sonowal, Bibha Ozah, Bikram Borkotoki, Pallab Kumar Sarma, Nikhilesh<br />
Baruah, Rekhashree Kalita, Prabal Saikia, Ravindra Chary<br />
AICRP for Dryland Agriculture, Biswanath College <strong>of</strong> Agriculture,<br />
Assam Agricultural University, Biswanath Chariali, Assam-784176, India<br />
Rice is one <strong>of</strong> the predominant cereal crops in the north-eastern part <strong>of</strong> India and is grown in<br />
majority <strong>of</strong> the area <strong>of</strong> Assam. In Assam, rice occupies about two-third <strong>of</strong> the total cropped<br />
area in the state. The Lakhimpur district is located in the north eastern part <strong>of</strong> Assam and agroclimatically<br />
lies in the north <strong>of</strong> river Brahmaputra. The average rainfall in this region is 2949<br />
mm. The region is also called as district <strong>of</strong> rivers due to presence <strong>of</strong> turbulent rivers and<br />
36 | Page Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
tributaries spreading all over the district. It may also be noted that the sali season mainly<br />
coincides with the time <strong>of</strong> heavy rainfall in the district, i.e., May/June-July/August due to which<br />
rice crop were badly affected and there occurs significant reduction in the production. Keeping<br />
the importance <strong>of</strong> above facts in mind, the present study was conducted with the hypothesis<br />
that productivity and pr<strong>of</strong>itability <strong>of</strong> rainfed rice fallow systems can be improved by growing<br />
rabi crops as second crop with the application <strong>of</strong> supplemental irrigation during dry spells only<br />
with the objectives: i) To study the effect <strong>of</strong> rice varieties on the performance <strong>of</strong> subsequent<br />
rabi crops, ii) To find out the efficiency <strong>of</strong> harvested rainwater on productivity <strong>of</strong> rabi crops.<br />
Methodology<br />
The field experiment was conducted at the experimental field <strong>of</strong> Regional Agricultural<br />
Research Station, North Lakhimpur, AAU, Assam in collaboration with All India Coordinated<br />
Research Project for Dryland Agriculture, Biswanath Chariali centre during 2018-2019, 2019-<br />
2020, 2020-2021 in randomized block design. It is situated at 101 m above mean sea level<br />
(MSL) with 26°48' and 27 o 53' Northern latitude and 93 o 42' and 94 o 20' East longitude. The<br />
texture <strong>of</strong> the soil <strong>of</strong> the experimental field was clay loam with a pH <strong>of</strong> 4.89 and organic carbon<br />
<strong>of</strong> 0.69. The field capacity <strong>of</strong> the soil is 23.41% and wilting point is 5.10%, soil was medium<br />
in available nitrogen (360.20 kg ha -1 ), available phosphorus (23.45 kg ha -1 ), and available<br />
potassium (170.65 kg ha -1 ). The rice-based cropping system was evaluated in a randomized<br />
block design with two factor combinations involving four replications. The factors were sowing<br />
dates (second crops preceded by medium duration rice varieties and second crops preceded by<br />
long duration rice varieties) and types <strong>of</strong> irrigation (flood irrigation and lifesaving sprinkler<br />
irrigation during dry spells only). The age <strong>of</strong> seedlings were 25 days and 60 days for medium<br />
duration rice variety (Kanaklata) and long duration rice variety (Gitesh) respectively. The<br />
individual plot size was 50 m 2 (10 m × 5 m) with a gross area <strong>of</strong> 2500 m 2 and the rabi crops<br />
grown were toria (TS-67), niger (GA-10), pea (Kaveri Improved). The seed rate <strong>of</strong> toria, niger,<br />
and pea were 10 kg ha -1 , 8 kg ha -1 , and 50 kg ha -1 respectively. Post harvesting <strong>of</strong> the kharif<br />
crops (medium and long duration rice varieties), the land preparation was done by tractordrawn<br />
plough followed by harrowing and levelling. The spacings were maintained at 25 cm x<br />
10 cm (Toria), 25cm x 5 cm (Niger), and 30cm x 10cm (Pea) row-to-row and plant-to-plant<br />
respectively. The fertilizer was applied as per recommendation <strong>of</strong> the package <strong>of</strong> practices<br />
(POP) <strong>of</strong> Assam in terms <strong>of</strong> Urea, SSP, and MOP. The crops were sown in the second fortnight<br />
<strong>of</strong> November and first fortnight <strong>of</strong> December. The daily meteorological data (rainfall) during<br />
the period <strong>of</strong> experimentation was collected at the meteorological observatory <strong>of</strong> the station,<br />
RARS North Lakhimpur, Assam Agricultural University, Lakhimpur. The soil properties were<br />
analysed separately after the harvesting <strong>of</strong> all the rabi crops. The water was applied as life<br />
saving irrigation during the occurrence <strong>of</strong> 10-days dry spell only through hose pipes and<br />
sprinkler irrigation systems from the harvested rainwater during the rabi crops only. The yield<br />
Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance<br />
37 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
<strong>of</strong> the rabi crops was converted to rice equivalent yields and comparison was done amongst<br />
the rabi crops (toria, niger and pea).<br />
Results<br />
The long duration rice variety (4-6.5 t ha -1 ) gives better yield than the medium duration rice<br />
variety (4-5.5 t ha -1 ). The yield <strong>of</strong> each rabi crops significantly decreased when sown after<br />
Gitesh (long duration rice variety) as compared to sowing <strong>of</strong> the same rabi crops after<br />
Kalanklata (medium duration variety). Though, the types <strong>of</strong> irrigation didn’t significantly affect<br />
crop yield, but 50 % water could be saved with sprinkler irrigation as compared to flood<br />
irrigation. The system yield <strong>of</strong> the cropping sequence reduces when sowing was delayed from<br />
1 st <strong>of</strong> December to 15 th Dec with flood and sprinkler irrigation, respectively. The sowing date<br />
had an impact in the yield and yield attributes <strong>of</strong> all the rabi crops irrespective <strong>of</strong> the irrigation<br />
treatments and the sprinkler irrigation gives better yield than the flooded irrigation for all the<br />
rabi crops. The system yield comes to be higher in case <strong>of</strong> all the rabi crops preceded by<br />
medium duration kanaklata variety, which indicates that the sowing date had an impact in the<br />
rabi crops irrespective <strong>of</strong> the irrigation types applied. The irrigation water used for rabi crops<br />
(preceded by medium duration rice variety) is 14% more than the water used for rabi crops<br />
(preceded by long duration rice variety). The difference in irrigation water used for the rabi<br />
crops in both the different varieties <strong>of</strong> preceded rice varieties is only due to the dry spells<br />
occurred during the crop periods. Though the irrigation water applied is at par in both the<br />
sprinkler and flooded irrigation, the time consumption (thus, more labour intensive) is more in<br />
case <strong>of</strong> flooded irrigation. The lowland areas can be used for growing <strong>of</strong> the rabi crops with<br />
life-saving irrigation depending on the dry spells occurred after the medium and long duration<br />
crops rather than keeping it fallow (general tradition <strong>of</strong> the farmers) in such land situations.<br />
The interaction effect <strong>of</strong> sowing date and irrigation types on the growth and yield attributing<br />
characters and yield <strong>of</strong> the crops are presented.<br />
System yield: The system yields <strong>of</strong> the different cropping sequences (rice-toria, rice-niger and<br />
rice-pea) were calculated for each year individually and pooled analysis was done. The study<br />
revealed that cropping sequence <strong>of</strong> medium duration rice (Kanaklata) – Pea shows the highest<br />
system yield <strong>of</strong> 88.43 q ha -1 and the lowest system yield (58.32 q ha -1 ) was observed in cropping<br />
sequence <strong>of</strong> Long duration rice (Gitesh) – Niger amongst all the cropping sequences<br />
respectively.<br />
38 | Page Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
System yield <strong>of</strong> the different cropping sequences based on two types <strong>of</strong> life saving<br />
irrigation during the study period<br />
Sl.<br />
No.<br />
Cropping sequence<br />
1. Medium duration rice<br />
(Kanaklata) -Toria<br />
2. Medium duration rice<br />
(Kanaklata) –Toria<br />
3. Long duration rice<br />
(Gitesh) -Toria<br />
4. Long duration rice<br />
(Gitesh) -Toria<br />
5. Medium duration rice<br />
(Kanaklata) -Niger<br />
6. Medium duration<br />
rice(Kanaklata) –<br />
Niger<br />
7. Long duration rice<br />
(Gitesh) - Niger<br />
8. Long duration rice<br />
(Gitesh) - Niger<br />
9. Medium duration rice<br />
(Kanaklata) -Pea<br />
10. Medium duration rice<br />
(Kanaklata) –Pea<br />
11. Long duration rice<br />
(Gitesh) - Pea<br />
12. Long duration rice<br />
(Gitesh) - Pea<br />
Types <strong>of</strong><br />
life saving<br />
irrigation<br />
System<br />
Yield<br />
2018-19<br />
System<br />
Yield<br />
2019-20<br />
System<br />
Yield<br />
2020-21<br />
System<br />
Yield<br />
(Pooled)<br />
B:C<br />
Flood 94.43 77.32 79.72 83.82 2.13<br />
Sprinkler 90.93 78.71 81.96 83.87 2.20<br />
Flood 60.98 53.45 72.00 62.14 0.81<br />
Sprinkler 65.85 55.66 77.75 66.42 0.92<br />
Flood 61.81 52.50 61.73 58.68 1.75<br />
Sprinkler 62.43 53.78 62.66 59.62 1.83<br />
Flood 55.28 50.23 69.46 58.32 1.16<br />
Sprinkler 54.39 51.10 69.84 58.44 0.89<br />
Flood 85.45 77.75 85.60 82.93 1.63<br />
Sprinkler 85.65 82.65 96.98 88.43 1.71<br />
Flood 76.1 66.90 85.90 76.30 1.24<br />
Sprinkler 76.6 68.75 87.40 77.58 1.32<br />
Conclusion<br />
The yield <strong>of</strong> each rabi crops significantly decreased when sown after Gitesh (long duration rice<br />
variety) as compared to sowing <strong>of</strong> the same rabi crops after Kalanklata (medium duration<br />
variety). The system yield <strong>of</strong> the cropping sequence reduces when sowing was delayed from<br />
1 st <strong>of</strong> December to 15 th Dec with flood and sprinkler irrigation, respectively. The sowing date<br />
had an impact in the yield and yield attributes <strong>of</strong> all the rabi crops irrespective <strong>of</strong> the irrigation<br />
treatments and the sprinkler irrigation gives better yield than the flooded irrigation for all the<br />
rabi crops. The system yield comes to be higher in case <strong>of</strong> all the rabi crops preceded by<br />
medium duration kanaklata variety, which indicates that the sowing date had an impact in the<br />
rabi crops irrespective <strong>of</strong> the irrigation types applied. The lowland areas can be used for<br />
growing <strong>of</strong> the rabi crops with life-saving irrigation depending on the dry spells occurred after<br />
Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance<br />
39 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
the medium and long duration crops rather than keeping it fallow (general tradition <strong>of</strong> the<br />
farmers) in such land situations.<br />
T1-11R-1402<br />
Evaluation <strong>of</strong> In Situ Moisture Conservation Techniques for Sustainable<br />
Productivity <strong>of</strong> Chick pea in Bundelkhand Region<br />
C.M. Tripathi, Manoj Kumar, Satish Pathak and K.S. Shukla<br />
Deendayal Research Institute, Tulsi Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Ganiwan, Chitrakoot 210206, M.P.<br />
Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) is commonly known as gram which is one <strong>of</strong> the important pulse<br />
crop <strong>of</strong> India. About 65% <strong>of</strong> global area with 68% <strong>of</strong> Global chickpea is contributed by India.<br />
In India, the area under chickpea was 7.37 million hectares with a production <strong>of</strong> 5.891 million<br />
tons and productivity <strong>of</strong> 799.19 kg ha -1 during rabi 2018-19 (Agropedia). In India, Madhya<br />
Pradesh is one <strong>of</strong> the major chickpea producing states. The problem under dryland agriculture<br />
is low yield and unstable production. Despite the realization that it is much difficult to increase<br />
the production from drylands, it cannot be neglected, as a large number <strong>of</strong> farmers with more<br />
than two-thirds <strong>of</strong> the cultivated area <strong>of</strong> the country is involved. Soil moisture conserve is a big<br />
challenge <strong>of</strong> dryland area, because its area is poor and unevenly distributed <strong>of</strong> rainfall for the<br />
period <strong>of</strong> crop growing stages. While, the soil moisture is utilized to crop for transpiration and<br />
taken up <strong>of</strong> nutrient, when the rainfall becomes insufficient to meet the potential needs to<br />
transpiration. These are causes to depletion in soil moisture storage and reduced the production<br />
and a situation which may be designated as agricultural drought. The major problem is<br />
agricultural drought. Agricultural drought reduced through the application <strong>of</strong> various In Situ<br />
moisture conserving technologies i.e. Contour bunding, Trench cum bund, land levelling,<br />
mulching and land shaping, and enhanced soil moisture conserving capability and productivity<br />
<strong>of</strong> this reason.<br />
Methodology<br />
The demonstrations (36) were organized on farmer’s field to demonstrate the impact <strong>of</strong><br />
moisture conservation technology on chick pea productivity over three years during kharif<br />
2015 - 2018 at Tithara and Rampurva villages at farmer’s fields in Chitrakoot under<br />
Bundelkhand reason. The soil <strong>of</strong> demonstration plots ranged from medium black to loamy soil.<br />
The average rainfall <strong>of</strong> this district is 850 mm and more than 75% <strong>of</strong> the precipitation is<br />
received over four months i.e. July - October. Five technologies were comprised like contour<br />
bunding, trench cum bund, land level and bunding, land shaping and farmer practices. The<br />
farmers used all packages and practices <strong>of</strong> this crop remaining to above technologies. The<br />
demonstrations were conducted to study the increase percentage <strong>of</strong> yield and moisture percent.<br />
The yield data were collected from both the demonstration and farmers practice by random<br />
40 | Page Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
crop cutting method. Qualitative data were converted into quantitative form and expressed in<br />
terms <strong>of</strong> per cent increase in yield calculated using following formula:<br />
(Potential yield – Demonstration yield)<br />
Technology index = X 100<br />
(Potential yield)<br />
Technology gap = Potential Yield – Demonstration yield<br />
Extension gap = Demonstration yield – Farmers practices yield<br />
(Improved practices – Farmers practices)<br />
% increased over farmers practices =<br />
(Farmers practices)<br />
X 100<br />
Tabular analysis involving simple statistical tools like mean was done by standard formula to<br />
analyze the data and draw conclusions and implications. For technologies, different extension<br />
approaches were made. In this region was supplied with moisture conservation technologies<br />
through KVK, Chitrakoot because more than area is to be found in undulated situation. The<br />
technology could successfully out yield all other farmers practices and recorded eye-catching<br />
higher yield. During 2018, the area under technology expanded horizontally to 120 hectares<br />
from a mere 2.5 hectare during first year (2015) <strong>of</strong> introduction and adopted by 31 farmers in<br />
2 villages. Due to efforts <strong>of</strong> KVK, scientists field visit, interpersonal communication and<br />
individual efforts <strong>of</strong> the farmers, the technology could spread to more than area <strong>of</strong> district.<br />
Results<br />
Effect <strong>of</strong> in situ moisture conservation practices on grain yield: Results <strong>of</strong> in situ moisture<br />
conservation techniques demonstrations was conducted during rabi 2015 and 2016 at farmers<br />
field. During the investigation years, the maximum chick pea grain yield was recorded with<br />
land levelling and bunding fallowed by mulching as compare to farmer practice. The enhanced<br />
grain yield 17.71% with creation <strong>of</strong> bunding and levelling as compared to farmers practices.<br />
The creation <strong>of</strong> land levelling and bunding to improve the soil moisture and nutrient availability<br />
resulted that enhanced yield over farmers practices. Improved soil moisture was mainly due to<br />
stay <strong>of</strong> water in field and reduced run<strong>of</strong>f intensity <strong>of</strong> water which facilitated better crop growth<br />
and yield <strong>of</strong> chick pea.<br />
Performance <strong>of</strong> technologies under dry land situation in chick pea crop (Mean data <strong>of</strong> 3 years)<br />
Technologies<br />
Area<br />
(ha)<br />
Benefited<br />
farmers<br />
Average Yield (q ha -1 )<br />
P. Yield Demo. Increase %<br />
Av.<br />
G.I.<br />
Av.<br />
N.I.<br />
B:C<br />
Ratio<br />
Contour bunding 3.0 6 24.00 15.25 16.41 61000 35500 2.39<br />
Trench cum bund 3.5 7 24.00 14.95 12.37 59800 34300 2.35<br />
Land level and<br />
bunding<br />
5.48 11 24.00 15.92 17.71 63680 38180 2.50<br />
Land shaping 2.8 7 24.00 14.80 11.48 59200 33700 2.32<br />
Farmer practices<br />
(Undulated land)<br />
- - 24.00 13.10 0.00 52400 26900 2.05<br />
Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance<br />
41 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Performance <strong>of</strong> technologies under dry land situation in chick pea crop (Mean data <strong>of</strong> 3 years)<br />
Technologies<br />
Moisture<br />
(%)<br />
Extension<br />
gap (q ha -1 )<br />
Soil Moisture status: The average soil moisture was highest in levelling land and bunding<br />
fallowed by contour bunding and further in land shape techniques. Further it is indicated that<br />
all in situ techniques recorded higher moisture conserve during the crop growth period as<br />
compare to farmer’s practices.<br />
Extension gap: Higher extension gap 12.9 q ha -1 was found during investigation years. This<br />
extension gap should be assigned to adoption <strong>of</strong> improved transfer technology in<br />
demonstrations practices resulted in higher seed yield than traditional farmer practices. This<br />
emphasized the need to educate the farmers through various means for more adoption <strong>of</strong><br />
improved high yielding varieties and newly improved agricultural technologies to bridge the<br />
wide extension gap. More use <strong>of</strong> new high yielding varieties by the farmers will subsequently<br />
change this alarming trend <strong>of</strong> extension gap. The new technologies will eventually lead to the<br />
farmers to discontinuance <strong>of</strong> old varieties with the new technology.<br />
Technology gap: The demonstrations recorded the technology gap <strong>of</strong> 10.9 q ha -1 during the<br />
study year, which was higher than that during 2016. The technology gap observed may be<br />
attributed to dissimilarity in the soil and weather situation.<br />
Technology index: The lower value <strong>of</strong> technology index is more feasibility. The technology<br />
index was reduced average 45 per cent during the experimentation year, which shows the<br />
higher feasibility <strong>of</strong> the demonstrated technology.<br />
Gross and net monitory returns: Among the various technologies, land level and bunding<br />
recorded higher average gross and net income (Rs. 63680 ha -1 and 38180 ha -1 ) as compared to<br />
all other technologies and fallowed by contour bunding (Rs. 61000 ha -1 and 35500 ha -1 ).<br />
However, the lowest gross and net monitory return was found with farmers practices (Rs. 52400<br />
ha -1 and 26900 ha -1 ) in traditional method. Maximum B:C ratio recorded with bunding and<br />
levelling (2.50) fallowed by contour bunding (2.39) over rest <strong>of</strong> the technologies. Therefore,<br />
minimum B:C ratio was found with farmers practices (2.05).<br />
Technology gap<br />
(q ha -1 )<br />
Technology<br />
index (%)<br />
Contour bunding 26.2 10.75 8.75 36.46<br />
Trench cum bund 23.5 11.05 9.05 37.71<br />
Land level and bunding 28.1 10.08 8.08 33.67<br />
Land shaping 24.8 11.2 9.2 38.33<br />
Farmer practices 22.7 12.9 10.9 45.42<br />
42 | Page Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Conclusion<br />
It is concluded that the evaluation <strong>of</strong> various in-situ moisture conservation techniques in chick<br />
pea crop under dry land situation in Bundelkhand region. Among the technologies, higher yield<br />
was recorded with land levelling and bunding practice and further improve soil moisture<br />
followed by contour bunding over to farmers practices in above situation.<br />
T1-11aR-1526<br />
Jalkund: Low-cost Water Harvesting Structure for Sustainable Livelihood<br />
in Rainfed Agroecosystem <strong>of</strong> Chandel district, Manipur, India<br />
Kangjam Sonamani Singh*<br />
Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Chandel<br />
ICAR Research Complex for NEH Region, Manipur<br />
* sonamanisingh@gmail.com<br />
Climate change is one <strong>of</strong> the biggest environmental threats facing the world, affecting natural<br />
resources and thus potentially impacting food production and security, sustained water supply,<br />
biodiversity <strong>of</strong> forests and other natural ecosystems, human health, and settlements. Chandel<br />
is one <strong>of</strong> the districts most strongly affected by climate change. The threat is especially greater<br />
wherever people’s livelihoods are particularly dependent on natural resources. In these<br />
vulnerable areas, climate adaptation measures are <strong>of</strong> central importance for the protection <strong>of</strong><br />
rural livelihoods and for ensuring sustainable development. Field observation was conducted<br />
during the rabi season <strong>of</strong> 2019, the Kharif and rabi season <strong>of</strong> 2020 and the Kharif season <strong>of</strong><br />
2021 at farmers’ fields with the objective to study the sustainable livelihood <strong>of</strong> the hill farmers<br />
<strong>of</strong> Chandonpokpi Village, Chandel District, Manipur, India. The rainwater or run-<strong>of</strong>f from the<br />
mountain streams can be harvested using an eco-friendly low-cost rainwater harvesting<br />
structure called Jalkund and used for multiple purposes. A dimension <strong>of</strong> 5 m x 4 m x 1.5 m has<br />
been found optimum for hills. During winter months when there is little or no rainfall, water<br />
conserved in poly-lined ponds (Jalkund) acts as a lifeline for the seasonal crops. Life-saving<br />
irrigation provided by these Jalkund broke the shackles <strong>of</strong> the otherwise age-old monocropping<br />
which has been the norm traditionally. These small water conservation units have<br />
made the farmers earn an additional extra income through double cropping. Jalkund truly came<br />
as a blessing for the farmers <strong>of</strong> Chandel who could cultivate a variety <strong>of</strong> vegetable crops after<br />
the harvesting <strong>of</strong> paddy.<br />
Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance<br />
43 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
T1-12P-1011<br />
Effect <strong>of</strong> Hydrogel and Organic Manures to Mitigate Abiotic Stress in<br />
Groundnut Under Rainfed Conditions <strong>of</strong> Saurashtra Region<br />
P. D. Vekariya*, H. R. Vadar, V. D. Vora, K. S. Jotangia and D. S. Hirpara<br />
Main Dry Farming Research Station, Junagadh Agricultural University, Targhadia (Rajkot),<br />
Gujarat, 360 023 India<br />
* pdvekaria@jau.in<br />
India is the second largest producer <strong>of</strong> groundnut in the world and contributes to 19.49 % <strong>of</strong><br />
world’s groundnut production next to China (36.29%). Groundnut is the premier oilseed crop<br />
<strong>of</strong> Gujarat and ranks first in the area and production. In Gujarat, 82 % <strong>of</strong> total areas <strong>of</strong><br />
groundnut fall in the Saurashtra region under rainfed condition and thus exposed to the vagaries<br />
<strong>of</strong> monsoon. Also soils <strong>of</strong> the Saurashtra region are having high clay content and cracking is a<br />
natural phenomenon during stress period. The soil application <strong>of</strong> superabsorbent polymers<br />
(SAPs) is found to be a promising methodology in rainfed areas. One such developed product<br />
is ‘Pusa hydrogel,’ which is the first successful indigenous semi-synthetic superabsorbent<br />
technology for conserving water and enhancing crop productivity and thereby increasing water<br />
use efficiency. This technology could be promising in terms <strong>of</strong> productivity improvement <strong>of</strong><br />
rainfed crops and in combating the moisture stress in agriculture. Hence an experiment was<br />
planned to study the effect <strong>of</strong> hydrogel and organic manures on the productivity and rain water<br />
use efficiency <strong>of</strong> groundnut.<br />
Methodology<br />
The field experiment was conducted during the kharif seasons <strong>of</strong> 2018to 2020at Main Dry<br />
Farming Research Station, Targhadia (Rajkot) under rainfed conditions. The soil <strong>of</strong> the<br />
experimental site was clayey, medium in available nitrogen and phosphorus and high in<br />
available potassium with mildly alkaline and non-saline. The experiment was laid out in<br />
factorial randomized block design with three replications with a gross plot size <strong>of</strong> 5.4 m X 4.8<br />
m and net plot size <strong>of</strong> 3.6 m X 2.4 m. The experiment comprised <strong>of</strong> 9 treatment combinations,<br />
consisting <strong>of</strong> 3 levels <strong>of</strong> hydrogel (0, 2.5 and 5.0 kg ha -1 ) and 3organic manure treatments<br />
(control, FYM @ 10 t ha -1 and vermicompost @ 2 t ha -1 ). The amount <strong>of</strong> hydrogel as per<br />
treatment was mixed with dry and fine sand <strong>of</strong> less than 0.25 mm size in 1:10 ratio, to distribute<br />
uniformly in the furrow. The sand mixed hydrogel was applied in furrow through drilling<br />
before sowing <strong>of</strong> seed. Groundnut (GG-20) was sown with the onset <strong>of</strong> monsoon each year at<br />
the distance <strong>of</strong> 60cmusing seed rate <strong>of</strong> 120 kg ha -1 and applied 12.5 kg N + 25.0 kg P2O5 ha -1 .<br />
The total rainfall received during the crop season (June to October) was 614, 1336 and 1160<br />
mm in 26, 39and 45 rainy days in the year 2018, 2019 and 2020, respectively. Productivity and<br />
rain water use efficiency <strong>of</strong> groundnut and soil moisture content was pooled over three years.<br />
44 | Page Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Economics <strong>of</strong> different treatments was worked out based on pooled results <strong>of</strong> pod and haulm<br />
yield <strong>of</strong> groundnut in terms <strong>of</strong> net returns ha -1 and B:C ratio considering the prevailing market<br />
price <strong>of</strong> produce and cost <strong>of</strong> cultivation.<br />
Results<br />
Based on three years pooled mean pod and haulm yield <strong>of</strong> groundnut and soil moisture content<br />
was affected significantly due to the application <strong>of</strong> hydrogel and organic manures.<br />
Significantly highest pod and haulm yield and soil moisture content was recorded under<br />
application <strong>of</strong> hydrogel @ 2.5 kg ha -1 over control. Among organic manures, application <strong>of</strong><br />
FYM @ 10 t ha -1 was recorded significantly highest pod and haulm yield as well as soil<br />
moisture content as compared to control, but it was remained at par with vermicompost @ 2.0<br />
t ha -1 in respect <strong>of</strong> pod yield and soil moisture content. Maximum rain water use efficiency<br />
(4.28 kg ha -1 mm -1 ) was obtained with application <strong>of</strong> hydrogel@ 2.5 kg ha -1 and FYM @ 10 t<br />
ha -1 as compared to rest <strong>of</strong> treatments under different levels <strong>of</strong> hydrogel and organic manure,<br />
respectively. Similarly, the application <strong>of</strong> hydrogel @ 2.5 kg ha -1 and FYM @ 10 t ha -1 gave<br />
the highest net returns <strong>of</strong> Rs. 82363 ha -1 and 80600 ha -1 with B: C ratio <strong>of</strong> 2.50 and 2.42, as<br />
compared to the rest <strong>of</strong> treatments under different levels <strong>of</strong> hydrogel and organic manure,<br />
respectively.<br />
Productivity, soil moisture content, rain water use efficiency and economics <strong>of</strong> groundnut as<br />
influenced by hydrogel and organic manures under rainfed conditions (pooled mean <strong>of</strong> 3years)<br />
Treatments<br />
Hydrogel levels (kg ha -1 )<br />
Productivity<br />
(kg ha -1 )<br />
Pod<br />
Haulm<br />
Soil<br />
moisture<br />
content<br />
(%)<br />
Rain<br />
water use<br />
efficiency<br />
(kg ha -1 mm -1 )<br />
Net<br />
return<br />
(Rs.<br />
ha -1 )<br />
B:C<br />
Ratio<br />
Control 1919 4809 21.70 3.85 71478 2.36<br />
2.5 2119 5411 23.75 4.28 82363 2.50<br />
5.0 2034 4853 23.76 4.07 72679 2.27<br />
SEm+ 48 141 0.35<br />
CD (P=0.05) 135 402 1.00<br />
Organic manures<br />
Control 1933 4757 22.47 3.86 72928 2.42<br />
FYM @10 t ha -1 2126 5381 23.80 4.28 80600 2.42<br />
Vermicompost @ 2.0 t ha -1 2013 4936 22.93 4.06 72992 2.29<br />
SEm+ 48 141 0.35<br />
CD (P=0.05) 135 402 1.00<br />
Conclusion<br />
Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance<br />
45 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
From the above findings, it could be concluded that application <strong>of</strong> hydrogel @ 2.5 kg ha -1 and<br />
FYM @ 10 t ha -1 was found superior in increasing the productivity, rain water use efficiency<br />
and economics <strong>of</strong> groundnut under rainfed conditions <strong>of</strong> Saurashtra region.<br />
T1-13P-1023<br />
Straw Mulching as Climate Resilience Measure for In-situ Water<br />
Management and Enhancing Productivity <strong>of</strong> Rainfed Soybean<br />
S.H. Narale*, M.S. Pendke, W.N. Narkhede, B.V.Asewar and P.H. Gourkhede<br />
Vasantrao Naik Marathwada Agricultural University, Parbhani (M.S.)<br />
*sskhune2602@gmail.com<br />
Soybean is a major kharif crop grown in Marathwada region <strong>of</strong> Maharashtra under rainfed<br />
condition and is being apreferred crop by the marginal and small rainfed farmers. The region<br />
receives mean annual rainfall <strong>of</strong> 880 mm. Rainfall in uncertain and erratic in this region. The<br />
productivity <strong>of</strong> soybean particularly in Marathwada region is variable due occurrence <strong>of</strong> 3 to 4<br />
dryspells during July to September. The crop productivity decreases with either deficiency <strong>of</strong><br />
rainfall or its distribution or due to moisture stress in critical growth period. Mulching is one<br />
<strong>of</strong> the important practices to conserve rainwater and thereby soil moisture which help sustain<br />
the crop productivity. It was also noted that straw mulching increased soil moisture content in<br />
the maize-wheat cropping system in the north-western regions <strong>of</strong> India, and thus enhanced crop<br />
productivity (Sharma et al. 2010).The study evaluated the effect <strong>of</strong> straw mulching on<br />
productivity and pr<strong>of</strong>itability <strong>of</strong> soybean with in-situ moisture conservation on farmer’s field.<br />
Methodology<br />
Research demonstrations were conducted on farmers’ fields during 2016-17 to 2020-21 under<br />
FLD at village Babhulgoan in Parbhani District in Marathwada region <strong>of</strong> Maharashtra. Most<br />
<strong>of</strong> the farmers were cultivating soybean under rainfed condition and were advocated to apply<br />
straw mulch in inter-row <strong>of</strong> soybean crop for moisture conservation. Demonstration fields were<br />
selected based on the willingness <strong>of</strong> the farmers. The rainfall data was collected from the<br />
nearest rain gauge station. The duration <strong>of</strong> dryspells and number <strong>of</strong> dryspells were recorded<br />
every year. The data on crop yield in both the field i.e. with straw mulch and without straw<br />
mulch were recorded.<br />
Results<br />
The mean annual rainfall <strong>of</strong> the station is 880.9 mm. Out <strong>of</strong> the 5years, above normal rainfall<br />
occurred during 4 years and below normal rainfall was observed in one year. However, the<br />
distribution <strong>of</strong> rainfall was different in every year. Out <strong>of</strong> the 5 years, 3 years i.e. 2017, 2019<br />
and 2020, 4 dryspells were observed every year which has resulted moisture stress during crop<br />
period.<br />
46 | Page Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Results show that yield attributes and yield viz., effective tiller/m 2 (89.3), finger length<br />
(6.38cm), ear weight (6.38g), no <strong>of</strong> grains/ear (938) and grain weight/ear/gram (3.32g) and<br />
1000 grain weight (3.28) were highest in technology option IV i.e. improved varieties (GPU-<br />
282) with (N40P30K20) and transplanting 20 days sold seedling in line sowing (PP10 cm & RR<br />
30cm). The maximum grain yield (23.46 q/ha) and straw yield (59.64 q/ha) were recorded in<br />
technology option IV followed by technology option III, TO-II & I. respectively. High yielding<br />
varieties with line sowing and recommended nutrient management increased the grain yield<br />
with increased nutrient supply on yield attributing the characters like effective tillers/m 2 , finger<br />
length, ear weight, number <strong>of</strong> grain/ear and grain weight/ear. Application <strong>of</strong> recommended<br />
dose <strong>of</strong> nutrients and line sowing facilitate weeding to operate three-time dry land weeder<br />
which lead to increase availability <strong>of</strong> nutrients and improve the soil properties, absorption and<br />
translocation <strong>of</strong> nutrient by crop resulting in increased yield. These results are in line with the<br />
finding <strong>of</strong> AK. Roy et al (2018).<br />
Data indicated that, with application <strong>of</strong> straw mulch, 29.53 per cent mean soil moisture was<br />
recorded during crop growth period as against the soil moisture <strong>of</strong> 24.22 per cent in the<br />
treatment <strong>of</strong> without mulching. Due to application <strong>of</strong> straw mulch, additional moisture <strong>of</strong> 21.92<br />
per cent was conserved. Aulakh and Sur (1999) conducted study on effect <strong>of</strong> mulching on soil<br />
moisture and found that due to mulching, additional soil moisture was conserved.<br />
Intervention<br />
Mean soil moisture during crop growth period<br />
Mean soil moisture (%)<br />
2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 Mean<br />
With mulching 28.64 29.55 29.12 30.36 29.98 29.53<br />
Without mulching 23.54 24.28 24.18 24.95 24.17 24.22<br />
Conclusion<br />
Soybean grain yield was found significantly increase by 16.40 per cent due to application <strong>of</strong><br />
straw mulch. The gross and net monetary returns were found significantly increase by 17.17<br />
and 22.61 per cent respectively, due to application <strong>of</strong> straw mulch. The BC ratio <strong>of</strong> 1.98 was<br />
observed due to application <strong>of</strong> straw mulch as against the BC ratio <strong>of</strong> 1.89 without application<br />
<strong>of</strong> straw mulch. Due to application <strong>of</strong> straw mulch, additional moisture <strong>of</strong> 21.92 per cent was<br />
conserved.<br />
References<br />
Aulakh PS and Sur HS. 1999. Effect <strong>of</strong> mulching on soil temperature, soil moisture, weed<br />
populationgrowth and yield in pomograinate. Prog. Hort. 31: 131-133<br />
Bu LD, Liu JL, Zhu L, Li SQ, Hill RL, Zhao Y. 2013: The effects <strong>of</strong> mulching on maize growth,<br />
yield and water use in a semi-arid region. Agric. Water Manag., 123: 71–78.<br />
Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance<br />
47 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Kumar R, Srivastva BKand Kumar R. 1998. Influence <strong>of</strong> different mulching materials on yield<br />
and quality <strong>of</strong> winter tomato. Proc. National Aca Sci. India Biol Sci 68(3-4): 279- 282<br />
Sekhon NK, Hira GS, Sidhu AS and Thind SS. 2005. Response <strong>of</strong> soybean (Glycine max Mer.)<br />
to wheat straw in different cropping seasons. Soil Use Manag.,21: 422-426<br />
Sharma AR, Singh R, Dhyani SK, Dube RK. 2010: Moisture conservation and nitrogen<br />
recycling through legume mulching in rainfed maize (Zea mays)-wheat<br />
(Triticumaestivum) cropping system. Nutr. Cycling Agroecosyst., 87: 187–197.<br />
T1-14P-1037<br />
Irrigation Requirement <strong>of</strong> Major Crops Under Changing Climatic<br />
Scenarios in Northern Gujarat Zone<br />
R. Rejani*, K.V. Rao, K. Sammi Reddy, D. Kalyan Srinivas, G.R. Chary,<br />
K.A. Gopinath, M. Osman and M. Prabhakar<br />
ICAR-Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, Hyderabad- 500 059, India<br />
*rrejani10@gmail.com<br />
Prolonged dry spells during the critical growth stages <strong>of</strong> the crops affect the rainfed crops,<br />
especially in the arid, semi-arid regions and dry sub-humid zones which in turn results in crop<br />
failure or reduction in yield. In India, the average temperature is predicted to increase by 2 to<br />
4 0 C with changes in the distribution and frequency <strong>of</strong> rainfall, number <strong>of</strong> rainy days and<br />
extreme events. Long term data analysis (1953-2000) indicated that Rajasthan, Gujarat and<br />
Andhra Pradesh are severely affected by drought. Many studies projected the adverse impacts<br />
<strong>of</strong> climate change on India’s water resources, agriculture and other ecosystems and hence<br />
concerted efforts are required for its mitigation and adaptation to reduce the adverse impacts<br />
and make Indian agriculture more resilient. In rainfed areas, the adoption <strong>of</strong> suitable in-situ<br />
interventions and supplemental irrigation are very essential to save the crops from prolonged<br />
dry spells. The selected study area, Northern Gujarat zone also suffers from prolonged dry<br />
spells coinciding with the vegetative and reproductive stages <strong>of</strong> the major rainfed crops and the<br />
adoption <strong>of</strong> suitable interventions are very important. Therefore, adoption <strong>of</strong> suitable in-situ<br />
moisture conservation measures and supplemental irrigation is very important for this area.<br />
Hence the present study was taken up to estimate the irrigation requirement <strong>of</strong> the major crops<br />
spatially and to find its variability over the years and also under changing climatic scenarios.<br />
Methodology<br />
The Northern Gujarat zone includes Ahmedhabad, Banaskantha, Gandhinagar, Mehsana, Patan<br />
and Sabarkantha districts and this region is highly vulnerable to the impact <strong>of</strong> climate change.<br />
This zone is semi-arid with an average annual rainfall <strong>of</strong> 613 mm. Around 94% <strong>of</strong> the rainfall<br />
is contributed by south-west monsoon, 4% by north-west monsoon and the remaining 2% is<br />
48 | Page Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
from summer rains. The normal onset <strong>of</strong> monsoon occurs during third week <strong>of</strong> September and<br />
prolonged dry spells are very common in this region mainly in August and September<br />
coinciding with the vegetative and reproductive stages <strong>of</strong> the major rainfed crops such as<br />
pearlmillet, castor, clusterbean, greengram and cowpea. The texture <strong>of</strong> the soil is sandy to sandy<br />
loam. Even though FAO Penman-Monteith method has been recommended as the sole standard<br />
method for ETo calculation (Allen et al., 1998), based on data availability for future scenarios,<br />
the Hargreaves and Samani (1985) method was used in the present study. The run<strong>of</strong>f was<br />
estimated spatially and temporally for a period <strong>of</strong> 63 years from 1951 to 2013 using IMD data<br />
and also under changing climatic scenarios(2030s) using ENSEMBLE data <strong>of</strong> CMIP 5<br />
corresponding to RCPs 4.5 and 6.0.<br />
Results<br />
Spatial and temporal variation <strong>of</strong> rainfall and irrigation requirement <strong>of</strong> major crops in the<br />
current and climate change scenarios<br />
Long term data from 63 years (1951 to 2013) is analyzed spatially and temporally to find the<br />
variability <strong>of</strong> rainfall patterns. At the Northern Gujarat zone, most <strong>of</strong> the sub-districts have rainfall<br />
ranged from 480 to 860 mm. The spatial and temporal variation in rainfall was analysed during 21<br />
years interval (1951-1971, 1972-1992, and 1993-2013). There was an increase in the number <strong>of</strong><br />
high rainfall blocks. This shows the climate change impacts and there is an increased potential for<br />
rainwater harvesting and its utilization in the region, especially in the high rainfall blocks. Under<br />
climate change scenarios, irrigation requirements <strong>of</strong> major crops such as pearlmillet, castor,<br />
clusterbean, cowpea and green gram are predicted. An increase in the irrigation requirement <strong>of</strong><br />
pearl millet is predicted for all the districts by 2030s compared to the baseline period under RCP<br />
4.5 and 6.0. Other crops have an increase in the irrigation requirementin some areas where as<br />
decrease in other areas by 2030s as in case <strong>of</strong> castor, clusterbean and greengram under both the<br />
scenarios. In case <strong>of</strong> castor and greengram, only a slight increase is noted in some areas and in case<br />
<strong>of</strong> clusterbean, the increase is negligible. Based on the irrigation requirement, water availability in<br />
the region and net pr<strong>of</strong>it from different crops, the optimization models were formulated for<br />
determining the optimal cropping patterns to enhance the farmers' income from the study area under<br />
the current scenario.<br />
Conclusion<br />
In this study, the irrigation requirement <strong>of</strong> major crops was determined using Hargreaves method<br />
and GIS during 1951-2013 and for 2030s using ENSEMBLE data <strong>of</strong> CMIP 5.0. There was an<br />
increase in the number <strong>of</strong> high rainfall blocks. An increase in the irrigation requirement <strong>of</strong> pearl<br />
millet is predicted for all the districts by 2030s under RCP 4.5 and 6.0 compared to baseline period.<br />
Other crops have an increase in the irrigation requirementin some areas whereas decrease in other<br />
areas by 2030s as in case <strong>of</strong> castor, clusterbean and greengram under changing climatic scenarios.<br />
Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance<br />
49 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
The variability in the irrigation demand in the near future will help in the sustainable planning <strong>of</strong><br />
water harvesting structures and its utilization.<br />
References<br />
Allen, R.G., Pereira, L.S., Raes, D and Smith, M., 1998. Crop evapotranspiration- Guidelines for<br />
computing crop water requirements, FAO Irrigation and drainage paper. 56. FAO, Rome,<br />
300(9): D05109.<br />
Hargreaves, G.H. and Samani, Z.A.1985. Reference crop evapotranspiration from temperature.<br />
Applied Engineering in Agriculture. 1(2): 96-99.<br />
T1-15P-1057<br />
Resilience in Rainfed Agriculture through Rainwater Management based<br />
on Catchment-Storage-Command Relationship in Assured Rainfall Zone <strong>of</strong><br />
Marathwada Region<br />
Ananya Mishra 1 , M.S. Pendke 1* , W.N. Narkhede 1 , P.H. Gourkhede 1 , D.P. Waskar 1 and<br />
G. Ravindra Chary 2<br />
1 AICRP on Dryland Agriculture, Vasantrao Naik Marathwada Agricultural University, Parbhani<br />
(M.S.)<br />
2 ICAR-CRIDA Hyderabad 500 059, Telangana<br />
*pendkemadan@gmail.com<br />
Marathwada region is a rainfed area. Though the majority area falls under assured rainfall zone,<br />
it is characterized by 2-3 prolonged dry spells during the crop growth period which resulted in<br />
variations in crop production and productivity. The average productivity <strong>of</strong> all kharif crops<br />
varies depending on monsoon behavior. In the present case study, surface run<strong>of</strong>f was estimated<br />
for the assured rainfall zone <strong>of</strong> Marathwada region for further planning <strong>of</strong> small rainwater<br />
harvesting structures (farm ponds). The importance <strong>of</strong> farm ponds is increasing greatly in recent<br />
years. Farm ponds are the small dugout ponds constructed for rainwater harvesting and thereby<br />
to supply water for supplemental/protective irrigation during dry spells in kharif or in rabi<br />
season for sustaining crop productivity. Farm pond technology is proven as most climate<br />
resilience technology under rainfed region<br />
Methodology<br />
The daily run<strong>of</strong>f for each run<strong>of</strong>f-producing rainfall event was estimated from 2011 to 2021<br />
using SCS curve number method. Considering the available maps <strong>of</strong> land use/ land cover and<br />
hydrological soil group, the area <strong>of</strong> each class <strong>of</strong> land was worked out. Assigning the suitable<br />
curve numbers for respective land use and HSG to each area, the weighted curve number was<br />
determined and used in the estimation <strong>of</strong> run<strong>of</strong>f potential. Based on the run<strong>of</strong>f potential from<br />
the standard catchment area, the fortnightly run<strong>of</strong>f volume was estimated and considering the<br />
50 | Page Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
pan evaporation and seepage rate from the soil strata, the cumulative run<strong>of</strong>f potential to be<br />
harvested in the farm pond was estimated. Accordingly, the sizes <strong>of</strong> farm pond as per catchment<br />
area were worked out.<br />
Result<br />
The hydrologic soil group for the region was observed as ‘D’ with slope range <strong>of</strong> 0.5-3.5 %.<br />
The weighted curve numbers for Parbhani station were calculated as 77, 89 and 95 for AMC I,<br />
II and III respectively. From the rainfall data <strong>of</strong> the last 11 years (2011-2021), the daily surface<br />
run<strong>of</strong>f was estimated and thereby, the yearly run<strong>of</strong>f was calculated. The average run<strong>of</strong>f data<br />
was used for farm pond designs. Data revealed that the average rainfall causing run<strong>of</strong>f was<br />
found to be 853.43 mm which generated mean run<strong>of</strong>f <strong>of</strong> 257 mm i.e. 28.31 per cent.<br />
Year-wise rainfall, run<strong>of</strong>f and % run<strong>of</strong>f<br />
Year Annual rainfall (mm) Rainfall<br />
(mm)<br />
Run<strong>of</strong>f (mm)<br />
% Run<strong>of</strong>f<br />
2011 677.5 636 164 25.78<br />
2012 688.2 678 140 20.64<br />
2013 1217.1 1134.4 345 30.41<br />
2014 560.2 422.7 60 14.19<br />
2015 574.8 414.1 70 16.90<br />
2016 1159.5 1142.1 385 33.70<br />
2017 995.7 987.2 375 37.98<br />
2018 808.1 802.4 304 37.88<br />
2019 968.6 950.8 299 31.44<br />
2020 1098.7 1023.6 376 36.73<br />
2021 1719.3 1196.4 309 25.82<br />
Average 951.60 853.43 257 28.31<br />
Maximum 1719.3 1196.4 385 37.98<br />
Run<strong>of</strong>f<br />
500<br />
400<br />
300<br />
200<br />
Rainfall-run<strong>of</strong>f relation-Parbhani<br />
y = 0.4043x - 88.882<br />
R² = 0.8687<br />
100<br />
0<br />
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400<br />
Rainfall<br />
Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance<br />
51 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Satheesh Kumar et.al. (2017), used rainfall-run<strong>of</strong>f modelling using SCS-CN method and<br />
similar results were obtained from the current study. The rainfall run<strong>of</strong>f relationship was<br />
worked out for further planning <strong>of</strong> small rainwater harvesting structures like farm ponds. The<br />
run<strong>of</strong>f potential is found to be 28.31 % <strong>of</strong> the rainfall indicating a good scope for rainwater<br />
harvesting and thereby, many more rainwater harvesting structures can be constructed based<br />
on site-specific conditions. A relation between rainfall and run<strong>of</strong>f for was worked out as Y =<br />
0.4043X – 88.882 (R 2 value - 0.8687). The linear rainfall-run<strong>of</strong>f relation obtained can be used<br />
for finding out run<strong>of</strong>f corresponding to any rainfall occurring in the area. Based on rainfallrun<strong>of</strong>f<br />
relationship and catchment–storage relationship and also looking to the climatic<br />
variations particularly rainfall intensity, duration and frequency in the last decade, the farm<br />
pond sizes for assured rainfall zone <strong>of</strong> Marathwada region were redesigned and standardized<br />
for further implementation <strong>of</strong> farm pond programme in the region. The details <strong>of</strong> farm pond<br />
sizes, storage capacity, the area under protective / supplemental irrigation and area under pond<br />
construction is presented as follows.<br />
Catchment<br />
area<br />
(ha)<br />
Farm pond sizes for assured rainfall zone <strong>of</strong> Marathwada region<br />
Top<br />
size <strong>of</strong><br />
pond<br />
(m x<br />
m)<br />
Bottom<br />
size <strong>of</strong><br />
pond<br />
(m x m)<br />
Side<br />
slope<br />
Depth<br />
<strong>of</strong><br />
pond<br />
(m)<br />
Capacity Area<br />
<strong>of</strong> pond under<br />
(m 3 ) irrigation<br />
(ha)<br />
Area<br />
irrigated<br />
%<br />
%<br />
catchment<br />
area under<br />
pond<br />
1.0 21 x 21 12 x 12 1.5 : 1 3 837 1.3 130 4.41<br />
2.0 27 x 27 18 x 18 1.5 : 1 3 1539 2.40 120 7.29<br />
3.0 33 x 33 24 x 24 1.5 : 1 3 2457 3.93 131 10.89<br />
Thus, rainwater harvesting based on catchment- storage relationship created an assured source<br />
<strong>of</strong> water for providing protective irrigation, particularly during dry spell periods for sustaining<br />
crop productivity to create resilience in rainfed agriculture.<br />
Conclusion<br />
Rainwater harvesting appears to be one <strong>of</strong> the most promising alternatives for the escalating<br />
demand for fresh water for rainfed agriculture. Rainfall-run<strong>of</strong>f relationship proved to be the<br />
most valuable information for the identification <strong>of</strong> run<strong>of</strong>f potential at any station. The run<strong>of</strong>f<br />
potential is found to be 28.31 %, indicating a good scope for rainwater harvesting. Farm pond<br />
sizes were standardized for recommendation to State Department <strong>of</strong> Agriculture for further<br />
implementation <strong>of</strong> farm pond programme in the region /state.<br />
52 | Page Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
References<br />
Satheesh Kumar, S., Venkateswaran, S and Kannan, R. 2017. Rainfall–run<strong>of</strong>f estimation using<br />
SCS–CN and GIS approach in the Pappiredipatti watershed <strong>of</strong> the Vaniyar sub basin,<br />
South India. Modeling Earth Sys. Environ., 3(1):24.<br />
T1-16P-1070<br />
Nutrient Uptake, Harvest Index and Economics <strong>of</strong> Wheat Varieties as<br />
Influenced by Alternate Furrow Irrigation<br />
Jyoti, Parveen Kumar*, Pawan Kumar and S.K. Thakral<br />
Department <strong>of</strong> Agronomy, CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar, Haryana, India<br />
*kumar10@hau.ac.in<br />
Wheat productivity is determined by better cultivars combined with efficient production<br />
methods. The most essential component in fulfilling a variety's production potential is its<br />
suitability to a certain agro-climate and crop production practices, particularly nitrogen and<br />
irrigation application. The lower dose <strong>of</strong> nitrogen results in poor yield while higher dose <strong>of</strong><br />
nitrogen causes environmental pollution and increases cultivation cost. Therefore, nitrogen<br />
should be applied in sufficient quantities through organic and inorganic sources is essential.<br />
Nitrogen loss and NO3-N contamination <strong>of</strong> surface and subsurface water can be resulted from<br />
flood irrigation with traditional flat planting and excessive nitrogen application (Akele; 2019).<br />
Alternate furrow irrigation (AFI) is a water-saving technique that is both affordable and simple<br />
to deploy. When compared to traditional furrow irrigation, AFI can reduce the irrigation water<br />
use by 40 per cent without reducing yield, resulting in increased water use efficiency (Cao et<br />
al. 2010).<br />
Methodology<br />
Field experiment was conducted during rabi season <strong>of</strong> 2021-22 at Agronomy Research Farm<br />
<strong>of</strong> the C.C.S. Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar, Haryana, India. The soil <strong>of</strong> the<br />
experimental site was sandy loam in texture, slightly alkaline in reaction, low in organic carbon<br />
and available nitrogen, medium in available phosphorus and high in available potassium. The<br />
experiment was carried out in split plot design with sixteen treatment combinations replicated<br />
thrice. The four varieties (WH 1105, HD 3086, HD 2967 and WH 1184) were assisted in main<br />
plot and nitrogen sources viz. control, 100% RDN through urea, 50% RDN through urea + 50%<br />
RDN through VC and 50% RDN through urea + 25% RDN through VC + 25% RDN through<br />
FYM in sub plots. The pre-sowing irrigation was applied through canal water and the<br />
subsequent two irrigations were applied in alternate furrow at CRI and flowering stage through<br />
an open channel using parshall flume. Furrows subjected to irrigation were open-ended;<br />
however, water does not exceed the edge <strong>of</strong> the plot, whereas other furrows not subjected to<br />
Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance<br />
53 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
irrigation were closed-ended. The rainfall received during the crop season was 71 mm. The<br />
nutrient uptake, harvest index and economics were calculated by using the standard formula.<br />
Results<br />
Nutrient uptake: Among varieties, significantly higher nutrient uptake (N, P and K) was<br />
recorded with the variety HD3086 over HD2967, however, it was statistically at par with<br />
variety WH 1184 in respect <strong>of</strong> N and K uptake and with WH 1105 and WH 1184 in respect <strong>of</strong><br />
phosphorous uptake in grain. Similarly, significantly, higher nutrient uptake (N, P and K0 in<br />
straw was found in variety HD3086 over variety WH 1105, HD 2967 and WH 1184. Among<br />
nitrogen sources, significantly higher nutrient uptake in straw was found with the application<br />
<strong>of</strong> 50% RDN through urea + 25% through VC + 25% FYM over other control, 100% RDN<br />
through urea and 50% RDN through urea + 50% through VC. Similar, trend was observed in<br />
respect <strong>of</strong> nutrient uptake by straw.<br />
Harvest index: Among varieties, significantly higher harvest index was registered with HD<br />
2967, which did not differ significantly with WH 1105 and WH 1184.Among nitrogen sources,<br />
100 per cent RDN through urea resulted in significantly higher harvest index but it did not<br />
differ with 50 per cent RDN through urea + 25 per cent RDN through VC + 25 per cent RDN<br />
through FYM and 50 per cent RDN through urea + 50 per cent RDN through VC.<br />
Benefit: cost ratio: The highest net pr<strong>of</strong>itability in terms <strong>of</strong> benefit cost ratio was obtained<br />
under HD 3086 with the application <strong>of</strong> 100 per cent RDN through urea followed by 50 per cent<br />
RDN through organic + 50 per cent RDN through VC.<br />
Effect <strong>of</strong> varieties and nitrogen sources on nutrient uptake, harvest index and<br />
economics <strong>of</strong> wheat under alternate furrow irrigation method<br />
Treatments Nutrient uptake (kg ha -1 ) Harvest<br />
Grain<br />
Straw<br />
index<br />
(%)<br />
N P K N P K<br />
Varieties<br />
WH 1105 52.8 7.4 8.3 52.1 7.8 67.2 37.5 1.2<br />
HD 3086 56.6 7.8 9.0 62.7 8.9 78.2 35.1 1.3<br />
HD 2967 48.2 6.7 7.7 44.9 7.0 58.3 39.1 1.1<br />
WH 1184 53.8 7.6 8.5 55.4 8.2 71.8 36.4 1.2<br />
CD 3.7 0.5 0.5 4.4 0.6 2.6 1.5 -<br />
Nitrogen sources<br />
Control 30.0 2.9 4.8 29.2 3.2 47.0 35.2 1.0<br />
100% RDN through urea 53.5 7.8 8.8 48.9 7.9 65.4 39.1 1.4<br />
50% RDN through urea + 50% through<br />
VC<br />
61.4 9.0 9.6 59.5 9.6 77.6 37.6<br />
B:C<br />
1.3<br />
54 | Page Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
50% RDN through urea + 25% through<br />
VC + 25% FYM<br />
66.6 9.9 10.3 77.4 11.1 85.7 36.2<br />
CD 3.8 0.6 0.7 4.1 0.6 2.4 2.0 -<br />
References<br />
Akele, Z. (2019). Evaluation <strong>of</strong> alternate, fixed and conventional furrow irrigation systems with<br />
different water application level on onion yield in Dubti. Afar, Ethiopia, 9(5)<br />
Cao, Q., Wang, S. Z., Gao, L. H., Ren, H. Z., Chen, Q. Y., Zhao, J. W., Wang, Q., Sui, X. L.<br />
and Zhang, Z. X. (2010). Effect <strong>of</strong> alternative furrow irrigation on growth and water use <strong>of</strong><br />
cucumber in solar greenhouse. Transactions <strong>of</strong> the Chinese Society <strong>of</strong> Agricultural<br />
Engineering, 26(1): 47-53 [in Chinese with English abstract].<br />
1.1<br />
T1-17P-1078<br />
Comparison <strong>of</strong> sustainable dryland cropping under Reduced Run<strong>of</strong>f<br />
Farming in Alfisols <strong>of</strong> Karnataka<br />
Santosh Nagappa Ningoji, M.N. Thimmegowda, Mudalagiriyappa, B.G. Vasanthi and<br />
H.S. Shivaramu<br />
All India Co-ordinated Research Project for Dryland Agriculture, UAS, GKVK, Bengaluru<br />
India is an agrarian country, where rainfed agriculture accounts for two-thirds <strong>of</strong> the total<br />
cropped area (66 %) and contributes 40 per cent to the national food basket. The mean annual<br />
rainfall in rainfed region ranging from 400 mm to 1000 mm, which is uncertain, erratic and<br />
unevenly distributed. Among 400 M ha-m <strong>of</strong> rainfall received, 150 M ha-m flows as surface<br />
run<strong>of</strong>f, subsurface run<strong>of</strong>f and will not available to any type <strong>of</strong> production in India. To mitigate<br />
the run<strong>of</strong>f caused by uneven, erratic and heavy rains, in-situ and ex-situ water harvesting<br />
techniques can be used efficiently. During the rainy season when water is not required for<br />
irrigation, the excess water can be stored in a ancillary reservoir or farm ponds and used<br />
effectively during crucial periods <strong>of</strong> crop growth (Ramachandrappa et al., 2017). The in-situ<br />
water harvesting can be attained through selection <strong>of</strong> proper cropping systems. In this regard,<br />
the predominant crops and cropping systems <strong>of</strong> Eastern dry zone <strong>of</strong> Karnataka were selected<br />
to standardize the efficient cropping system to reduce the run<strong>of</strong>f, soil loss and nutrients loss.<br />
Along with cropping systems the harvested water in farm pond is used as protective irrigation<br />
during dry spells to the know effect on yield and yield parameters <strong>of</strong> different cropping systems.<br />
Methodology<br />
Experiment was carried out to study ‘Comparison <strong>of</strong> sustainable dryland cropping under<br />
Reduced Run<strong>of</strong>f Farming in Alfisols <strong>of</strong> Karnataka’ at the All-India Co-ordinated Research<br />
Project on Dry Land Agriculture, University <strong>of</strong> Agricultural Sciences, GKVK, Bengaluru in<br />
Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance<br />
55 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
the Eastern Dry Zone <strong>of</strong> Karnataka during 2019-20 and 2020-21. The experiment was<br />
conducted using RCBD design with factorial concept with two factors viz., Cropping system<br />
for harvesting <strong>of</strong> run<strong>of</strong>f water from the micro watershed in farm ponds’ consist <strong>of</strong> cropping<br />
system viz., T1 : French bean sole (Arka Arjun), T2 : Finger millet sole(MR-1), T3 : Pigeonpea<br />
(BRG-5)+ field bean (1:1) (HA-4), T 4 : Finger millet (MR-1) + Pigeonpea (8:2), T 5: Perennial<br />
mixed fruit (Pomelo + Guava) orchard and Kitchen garden (Ladies finger, capsicum, tomato,<br />
french bean, brinjal, leafy vegetables, green chilli, knol khol, cluster bean, ridge guard,<br />
cabbage) and ‘Water productivity enhancement strategies’ consist <strong>of</strong> I 1 : Protective advanced<br />
irrigation (sensor based micro irrigation during dry spell) and I2 : Control.<br />
Results<br />
The results revealed that significantly higher grain/ pod yield was recorded with application <strong>of</strong><br />
one sensor based micro irrigation during dry spell in french bean (10097 kg ha -1 ), finger millet<br />
(4126 kg ha -1 ), pigeonpea (887 kg ha -1 ) & field bean (3258 kg ha -1 ) in pigeonpea + field bean<br />
(1:1) cropping system, finger millet (3768 kg ha -1 ) & pigeonpea (166 kg ha -1 ) in finger millet+<br />
pigeonpea (8:2) cropping system, pumelo fruit yield (15429 kg ha -1 ) as compared to their<br />
respective control. The kitchen garden recorded a total <strong>of</strong> 9982 kg ha -1 yield from various crops<br />
grown during the study in kitchen garden. The results are in line with Bhandarkar and Reddy<br />
(2010), where they noticed two-fold increase in yield <strong>of</strong> soybean, chickpea, rice and wheat with<br />
application <strong>of</strong> protective irrigation from farm pond. Similarly, application <strong>of</strong> one irrigation<br />
during dry spell also increased stover/straw yield <strong>of</strong> cropping system as compared to their<br />
respective control. Among different cropping systems french bean with one protective<br />
irrigation has recorded higher finger millet equivalent yield (9627 kg ha -1 ) as compared to other<br />
cropping systems and it was followed by pigeonpea + field bean (1:1) cropping system (5624<br />
kg ha -1 ). Rain water use efficiency and total water use efficiency were also higher with<br />
application <strong>of</strong> one protective irrigation at dry spell as compared to their control. The increased<br />
yield resulted in higher rain water use efficiency and total rain water use efficiency as compared<br />
to control.<br />
Conclusion<br />
It can be concluded from two years <strong>of</strong> experiment that application <strong>of</strong> sensor based micro<br />
irrigation during dry spell by using run<strong>of</strong>f water stored in the farm pond has resulted in higher<br />
yield in french bean (24.46 %), finger millet (21.17 %), pigeonpea (25.45 %) & field bean (37.4<br />
%) in pigeonpea + field bean (1:1) cropping system, finger millet (25.39 %) & pigeonpea (36.06<br />
%) in finger millet + pigeonpea (8:2) cropping system, pumelo fruit yield (21.37 %).<br />
References<br />
Bhandarkar, D. M. and Reddy, K. S., 2010, Water harvesting and recycling technology for<br />
sustainable agriculture in vertisols with high rainfall in National Workshop cum Brain<br />
56 | Page Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Storming on Rainwater harvesting and reuse through farm ponds, CRIDA, Hyderabad.<br />
India, April 21-22, 2009, pp. 276 – 289.<br />
Oweis, T., 1997, Supplemental irrigation: A highly efficient water-use practice. ICARDA,<br />
Aleppo, Syria, pp. 16.<br />
Ramachandrappa, B. K., Thimmegowda, M. N., Anitha, M., Srikanth Babu, P. N., Devaraja,<br />
K., Gopinath, K. A., Srinivasa Rao, C. H. And Ravindrachary, G., 2017, Efficient<br />
rainwater harvesting and its diversified utilization in Alfisols <strong>of</strong> Eastern Dry Zone <strong>of</strong><br />
Karnataka. Indian j. dryland agric. res. dev. 32 (2): 83 - 90.<br />
Yield and yield parameters as influenced by water productivity enhancement strategies<br />
Treatments<br />
T 1: French bean sole*<br />
in different cropping systems under reduced run<strong>of</strong>f farming<br />
Grain or<br />
pod yield<br />
(kg ha -1 )<br />
Stover or<br />
straw yield<br />
(kg ha -1 )<br />
Harv<br />
est<br />
index<br />
Number <strong>of</strong><br />
ears or<br />
pods/plant<br />
Length <strong>of</strong><br />
ears or<br />
pods<br />
(cm)<br />
Weight <strong>of</strong><br />
pods or<br />
grains<br />
(g)/plant<br />
T 1I 1: French bean 10097 3967 0.72 41.8 15.83 112.34<br />
T 1I 2: French bean 8112 3380 0.71 35.99 14.05 93.49<br />
‘t’ test @ 5% S S NS S S S<br />
T 2: Finger millet sole**<br />
T 2I 1: Finger millet 4126 5182 0.44 7.8 8.83 17.71<br />
T 2I 2: Finger millet 3405 4479 0.43 6.37 7.99 14.81<br />
‘t’ test @ 5% S S NS S S S<br />
T 3: Pigeonpea** + field bean* (1:1)<br />
T 3I 1: Pigeonpea 887 3521 0.2 193.07 5.87 81.24<br />
T 3I 2: Pigeonpea 707 2959 0.19 154.42 5.77 60.49<br />
‘t’ test @ 5% S S NS S S S<br />
T 3I 1: Field bean 3258 3927 0.46 31.27 6.73 49.35<br />
T 3I 2: Field bean 2370 3423 0.42 23.77 6.45 41.57<br />
‘t’ test @ 5% S S NS S S S<br />
T 4: Finger millet**+ pigeonpea**(8:2)<br />
T 4I 1: Finger millet 3768 4747 0.44 7.99 8.42 17.1<br />
T 4I 2: Finger millet 3005 4109 0.42 6.55 7.59 13.88<br />
‘t’ test @ 5% S S NS S S S<br />
T 4I 1: Pigeonpea** 166 645 0.21 74.72 5.71 41.13<br />
T 4I 2: Pigeonpea** 122 581 0.17 68.1 5.64 32.31<br />
‘t’ test @ 5% S S NS S S S<br />
T 5: Pomelo<br />
T 5I 1: Pomelo 15429<br />
Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance<br />
57 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
T 5I 2: Pomelo 12712<br />
‘t’ test @ 5% S<br />
Water productivity enhancement strategies<br />
I 1: Sensor based micro irrigation during dry spell<br />
Note: * Pod yield per ha ** Grain yield per ha<br />
I 2: Control<br />
S- Significant; NS- Not Significant<br />
T1-18P-1083<br />
Conservation Furrow-A Low-Cost Climate Resilient Technology to<br />
Enhance the Productivity <strong>of</strong> Rainfed Crops and Cropping Systems in<br />
Scarce Rainfall Zone <strong>of</strong> Andhra Pradesh<br />
A. Malliswara Reddy 1 , B. Sahadeva Reddy 1 , C. Radhakumari 1 , B. Ravindranatha<br />
Reddy 1 , R. Veeraraghavaiah 1 , G. Ravindrachary 2 and K.A. Gopinath 2<br />
1 Agricultural Research Station, Ananthapuramu-515 001, Andhra Pradesh, India.<br />
2<br />
ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad-500 059, India<br />
Among various extreme climatic events, <strong>of</strong> which drought (moisture stress) is one <strong>of</strong> the most<br />
important abiotic stresses which influence the rainfed crops productivity. In India, moisture<br />
stress is a recurring chronic problem, which has a sizeable proportion <strong>of</strong> area falling in arid and<br />
semi-arid tropics. Two-thirds <strong>of</strong> India’s agricultural land is vulnerable to moisture stress <strong>of</strong><br />
various intensities, and the probability <strong>of</strong> occurrence <strong>of</strong> moisture stress is over 35 per cent. The<br />
intra-seasonal dryspells due to erratic distribution <strong>of</strong> rainfall coupled with crop season<br />
significantly influenced the productivity <strong>of</strong> rainfed crops. Adequate moisture is essential during<br />
key developmental stages and even short periods <strong>of</strong> moisture stress during these stages can<br />
cause significant loss in yield <strong>of</strong> rainfed crops. Efficient management <strong>of</strong> a dry spells with a<br />
suitable rainwater management practice is desired for different crops under rainfed agriculture.<br />
The conservation furrow is a simple and low cost in situ rain water conservation practice<br />
adopted in alfisols and associated soils with problems <strong>of</strong> crusting and sealing for rainfed areas<br />
(400-900 mm rainfall) with moderate slope varying from 1 to 4 %. Furrows at 3-5 m apart on<br />
contour or across slope are opened either during planting or during intercultural operation using<br />
a country plough in this system. These furrows harvest the local run<strong>of</strong>f water and improve soil<br />
moisture in the adjoining crop rows, particularly during the period <strong>of</strong> water stress. This practice<br />
has been found to increase the crop yields by 10-25% (Venkateswarlu et al., 2016). Hence, the<br />
present study was conducted to identify the most suitable and efficient low-cost climate<br />
resilient technology to enhance the productivity in predominant rainfed crops and cropping<br />
systems under scarcity zone <strong>of</strong> Andhra Pradesh.<br />
58 | Page Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Methodology<br />
On-farm demonstrations were conducted at farmers’ fields during 2017-2021 under the project<br />
entitled “National Innovations in Climate Resilient Agriculture (NICRA)”, which is an<br />
operational area at Vannedoddi village <strong>of</strong> Gooty mandal, Ananthapuramu district <strong>of</strong> Andhra<br />
Pradesh, which is geographically situated in between 15 0 08 ’ N latitude and 77 0 40 ’ E longitude.<br />
The predominant soils in this region are red sandy loam in texture with near neutral in reaction,<br />
low in organic carbon and available nitrogen, medium in available phosphorus and potassium.<br />
Demonstration fields were selected based on the willingness <strong>of</strong> the farmers to implement<br />
participatory research to evaluate the science-based approach. The selected farmers in the<br />
village participated in every intervention like soil sampling, input application and growth and<br />
yield estimation. At the demonstration site, the normal rainfall was 595.6 mm. Out <strong>of</strong> five years<br />
study (2017-2021), 2018 is rain deficit year in which 44 per cent deficit rainfall was recorded.<br />
Three years i.e. 2019, 2020 and 2021 were rainy excess years in which 29, 95 and 61 per cent<br />
excess rainfall was recorded respectively. The rainfall during 2017 was found normal. The<br />
variations in rainfall patterns clearly showed that rainfall vulnerability. During the above study<br />
period (2017-2021), the dryspells were recorded at different phenophases <strong>of</strong> crop growth period<br />
in rainfed crops. During the study period, 2 to 4 dryspells occurred with 11 to 67 consecutive<br />
rainless days was noticed. To overcome this dryspells, the climate resilient technologies like<br />
in-situ moisture conservation through formation <strong>of</strong> conservation furrows at every crop row in<br />
sole castor and pigeonpea + pearlmillet (1:1) intercropping system were conducted on farmer<br />
fields as participatory approach during 2017-2021.<br />
Results<br />
The five years data indicated that higher seed yield, net monetary returns, benefit-cost ratio and<br />
rainwater use efficiency were recorded with formation <strong>of</strong> conservation furrow at every crop<br />
row compared to control (without conservation furrow). Mean data revealed that, the seed yield<br />
<strong>of</strong> castor was increased by16.3% and additional net returns <strong>of</strong> Rs.4331ha -1 was realized with<br />
the formation <strong>of</strong> conservation furrows compared to control. This might be due to conservation<br />
furrows helps to conserve more rainwater in the root zone, which in turn beneficial to cope up<br />
with mid-season drought in castor.<br />
Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance<br />
59 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Effect <strong>of</strong> conservation furrows on castor productivity, economics and rainwater use<br />
efficiency<br />
Year Intervention<br />
Seed<br />
yield<br />
(kg ha -1 )<br />
% Yield<br />
increase<br />
over<br />
control<br />
NMR<br />
(Rs. ha -1 )<br />
B:C<br />
Ratio<br />
RWUE<br />
(kg ha -1<br />
mm -1 )<br />
2017 Formation <strong>of</strong> conservation furrows 745 14.2 18920 1.95 1.50<br />
Control (without conservation<br />
furrows)<br />
652 -- 13780 1.52 1.24<br />
2018 Formation <strong>of</strong> conservation furrows 437 18.4 -892 0.94 0.65<br />
Control (without conservation<br />
furrows)<br />
369 -- -3204 0.79 0.55<br />
2019 Formation <strong>of</strong> conservation furrows 666 21.1 16884 2.07 1.79<br />
Control (without conservation<br />
furrows)<br />
550 -- 11200 1.71 1.48<br />
2020 Formation <strong>of</strong> conservation furrows 875 16.7 17500 2.00 1.36<br />
Control (without conservation<br />
furrows)<br />
750 -- 13750 1.85 1.17<br />
2021 Formation <strong>of</strong> conservation furrows 1034 11.2 34200 2.95 1.76<br />
Control (without conservation<br />
furrows)<br />
930 -- 31450 2.76 1.62<br />
Effect <strong>of</strong> conservation furrows on productivity and economics <strong>of</strong> intercropping system<br />
Year Intervention<br />
2017 Formation <strong>of</strong> conservation<br />
furrows<br />
Control (without conservation<br />
furrows)<br />
2018 Formation <strong>of</strong> conservation<br />
furrows<br />
Control (without conservation<br />
furrows)<br />
2019 Formation <strong>of</strong> conservation<br />
furrows<br />
Control (without conservation<br />
furrows)<br />
2020 Formation <strong>of</strong> conservation<br />
furrows<br />
Control (without conservation<br />
furrows)<br />
2021 Formation <strong>of</strong> conservation<br />
furrows<br />
Control (without conservation<br />
furrows)<br />
Pigeonpea<br />
equivalent<br />
yield<br />
(kg ha -1 )<br />
% yield<br />
increase<br />
over<br />
control<br />
NMR<br />
(Rs. ha -1 )<br />
B:C<br />
Ratio<br />
RWUE (kg<br />
ha -1 mm -1 )<br />
1392 14.5 24,688 2.97 1.26<br />
1216 -- 22,359 2.74 1.13<br />
192 20.8 -1998 0.84 0.72<br />
159 -- -2846 0.70 0.60<br />
546 16.9 15302 1.94 0.82<br />
467 -- 10836 1.66 0.70<br />
975 19.5 30,050 2.13 1.57<br />
816 -- 22,227 1.88 1.32<br />
488 14.8 2,460 1.09 0.85<br />
425 -- 510 1.01 0.73<br />
60 | Page Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Similarly, formation <strong>of</strong> conservation furrows influenced the yield and economics <strong>of</strong><br />
pigeonpea+pearlmillet (1:1) intercropping system. The data revealed that the higher pigeonpea<br />
equivalent yield, net returns, B:C ratio and rainwater use efficiency were recoded with<br />
formation <strong>of</strong> conservation furrows compared to without conservation furrows. The pigeonpea<br />
equivalent yield was increased by17.3% and realized additional monetary net returns <strong>of</strong> Rs.<br />
53086 ha -1 with formation <strong>of</strong> conservation furrows compared to control. Conservation furrows<br />
act as mini reservoirs through harvesting the local surface run<strong>of</strong>f water and improves soil<br />
moisture in the adjoining crop rows, particularly during the period <strong>of</strong> water stress<br />
(Venkateswarlu et al., 2016).<br />
Conclusion<br />
Conservation furrows enhanced the seed yield, economics and rainwater use efficiency in<br />
castor and pigeonpea + pearlmillet (1:1) intercropping system. Hence, formation <strong>of</strong><br />
conservation furrows are low cost climate resilient technology to cope mid-season drought in<br />
rainfed crops under scarcity zone <strong>of</strong> Andhra Pradesh.<br />
References<br />
Venkateswarlu, B., Chary, G. R., Singh, G and Shivay, Y. S. 2016. Climate Resilient<br />
Agronomy. The Indian Society <strong>of</strong> Agronomy, New Delhi.120-142.<br />
Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance<br />
T1-19P-1129<br />
Conservation and Rainwater Storage Structure (CNB) on Drainage Line<br />
for Developing Groundwater Regimes in Vidarbha Region<br />
R. S. Patode, Ranee Wankhade, V. P. Pandagale, V. V. Gabhane, M. M. Ganvir,<br />
A. B. Chorey and R. S. Mali<br />
All India Coordinated Research Project for Dryland Agriculture, Dr. Panjabrao Deshmukh Krishi<br />
Vidyapeeth, Akola (M.S.), India<br />
Groundwater resources appraisal in various areas <strong>of</strong> the country is must for the integrated<br />
management and development <strong>of</strong> water resources. A wide spatial-temporal change in the<br />
amount <strong>of</strong> groundwater resources warrants systematic exploration to place most excellent open<br />
wells and bore well location for tapping this important natural resource. The water conditions<br />
for agriculture, municipal and industries are responsible for increase than the yearly<br />
groundwater recharge and it was observed that during last decades every country will be facing<br />
scanty rainfall, thus day by day decreases groundwater table. On the other hand, nonstop<br />
exploration from groundwater reservoir in surplus <strong>of</strong> replenishable groundwater recharge may<br />
direct effect in lowering <strong>of</strong> groundwater table, agricultural production and also human<br />
organism (Khadri and Pande, 2016). The further insufficiency <strong>of</strong> water for various agricultural<br />
production systems should be overcome by using efficient soil and water conservation and<br />
61 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
management practices. Moreover, the strategy decisions on water management are more<br />
essential for groundwater resource management and also for impact assessment on<br />
groundwater regime with efficient method at any country level. Groundwater resources<br />
evaluation in many areas <strong>of</strong> the Vidarbha region is important for the developmental strategies<br />
<strong>of</strong> integrated watershed development and management.<br />
Methodology<br />
The study was undertaken under Agri-CRP on Water project (Funded by ICAR-IIWM,<br />
Bhubaneswar) to analyze the impact <strong>of</strong> rainwater harvesting structure on groundwater seasonal<br />
fluctuations at Kajaleshwar-Warkhed watershed Tq. Barshitakli, Distt. Akola in Maharashtra.<br />
The work <strong>of</strong> Nala widening/deepening and repairs <strong>of</strong> rainwater harvesting structure was done<br />
for quantification <strong>of</strong> groundwater recharge and agricultural development in the dryland area in<br />
the watershed. Groundwater level data has been collected from 51 observation wells for<br />
analysis <strong>of</strong> rainwater harvesting impact on groundwater regime in watershed area.<br />
Groundwater levels data were monitored for groundwater analysis with the help <strong>of</strong> GIS<br />
s<strong>of</strong>tware. Groundwater fluctuation maps have been generated from interpolation techniques in<br />
Arc GIS 10.3 s<strong>of</strong>tware. The beneficiaries/ farmers in the vicinity <strong>of</strong> this drainage line were<br />
selected for crop planning and uses <strong>of</strong> harvested water through micro-irrigation system. The<br />
wells located surrounding these drains were surveyed and monitored for groundwater levels.<br />
Results<br />
The rainwater harvesting activity is more essential for agricultural development. Groundwater<br />
level fluctuation analysis is mainly depending on the variation <strong>of</strong> water level data during postmonsoon<br />
periods which can be directly related to recharge and discharge <strong>of</strong> groundwater<br />
regime. Groundwater level data has been collected from 51 observation wells in the vicinity <strong>of</strong><br />
10 CNBs for analysis <strong>of</strong> rainwater harvesting impact on groundwater regime in watershed area.<br />
It was observed that, during 2019 (51 wells) average depth <strong>of</strong> water level was 2.81 m and<br />
during 2020 (51wells) average depth <strong>of</strong> water level was 2.17. The groundwater level<br />
fluctuations in 2020 as compared to 2019 were observed. The well water levels were observed<br />
to be increased in 2020 as compared to 2019 for maximum wells. The average depth in the<br />
wells in 2020 was increased by 0.64m with respect to the levels in 2019 and by 4.08 m as<br />
compared to the well levels during 2016 (Patode et al., 2016). This is due to the storage <strong>of</strong><br />
rainwater in the widened and deepened nala for longer duration. It was also possible to utilize<br />
the recharged water for protective irrigations to different crops.<br />
Increase in yield during kharif and rabi season<br />
Increase in the ground water levels in wells and availability <strong>of</strong> water in the wells as well as<br />
CNBs benefited to farmers to take other crops like turmeric, onion, cabbage, brinjal and chilly<br />
other than soybean and chickpea. One protective irrigation during the dry spell from stored<br />
62 | Page Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
water and also groundwater used for soybean demonstration plots have resulted in significant<br />
increase in yield as compared to rainfed condition or without irrigation at the Warkhed-<br />
Kajaleshwar watershed. It was observed that the average yield <strong>of</strong> soybean with one protective<br />
irrigation was increased in the range <strong>of</strong> 16.00 % to 33.00 % over without irrigation. During<br />
rabi season for chickpea the stored rainwater was used for protective irrigation. It was observed<br />
that the average yield <strong>of</strong> chickpea with one protective irrigation was increased in the range <strong>of</strong><br />
16.92 % to 29.52 % over without irrigation. Similarly, the average yield with two protective<br />
irrigations was increased in the range <strong>of</strong> 30.18 % to 52.00 % over without irrigation.<br />
Conclusion<br />
It can be inferred that due to storage <strong>of</strong> water for longer time in the drainage line (Nallas,<br />
CNBs), the well recharge took place resulting into increase <strong>of</strong> ground water table. Thus,<br />
sufficient water will be available for providing protective irrigations to different crops. The<br />
farmers were able to raise different crops thereby having more income generation compared to<br />
earlier situation. Crop diversification and sustainability in agriculture occurred. Based on these<br />
results it can be recommended to undertake the deepening and widening <strong>of</strong> existing drainage<br />
line network along with construction or repairing <strong>of</strong> the permanent structures and reuse <strong>of</strong><br />
harvested water through micro-irrigation in the entire Vidarbha region <strong>of</strong> Maharashtra for<br />
sustainable crop production and water resources development.<br />
References<br />
Khadri, S.F.R. and Chaitanya Pande. 2016. GIS based analysis <strong>of</strong> groundwater variation in<br />
Mahesh River Basin, Akola and Buldhana Districts, Maharashtra, India. Int.J. Pure<br />
and Applied Res. Engrg. Technol., 4 (9):127-136.<br />
Patode RS, Nagdeve MB and Pande CB. 2016. Groundwater level monitoring <strong>of</strong> Kajaleshwar-<br />
Warkhed watershed, Tq. Barshitakli, Dist. Akola, India through GIS Approach.<br />
Adv.in Life Sci., 5(24), 11207-11210.<br />
Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance<br />
T1-20P-1144<br />
Effect <strong>of</strong> Irrigation and Nitrogen Sources on Yield and Water Use<br />
Efficiency <strong>of</strong> Lettuce (Lactuca Sativa L.) in West Bengal<br />
Madhurima Dey, Manimala Mahato and Dhananjoy Dutta<br />
Department <strong>of</strong> Agronomy, Bidhan Chandra Krishi Viswavidyalaya,<br />
Mohanpur, Nadia, West Bengal, India 741252<br />
Leafy vegetables like lettuce demands more water and nutrients for better production, which<br />
sometimes leads to unbalanced and indiscriminate application <strong>of</strong> inputs. A field experiment<br />
was designed to find out the performance <strong>of</strong> lettuce under irrigation scheduling based on<br />
IW/CPE ratio combined with application <strong>of</strong> nitrogen through different sources.<br />
63 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Methodology<br />
The field experiment was carried out during the rabi seasons <strong>of</strong> 2017-18 and 2018-19 at<br />
B.C.K.V in sandy loam alluvial soil laid out in split-plot design with four main plot treatments<br />
viz. I1 = Irrigation at 15 days intervals (farmers’ practice), I2 = Irrigation at IW/CPE ratio 0.6,<br />
I 3= Irrigation at IW/CPE ratio 0.8, I 4= Irrigation at IW/CPE ratio1.0 and three subplot<br />
treatments viz. N1=100% RDN (Recommended dose <strong>of</strong> nitrogen) @ 100 kg N ha -1 (inorganic<br />
urea), N 2=75% RDN (inorganic urea) +25% RDN (vermicompost) and N 3= 100% RDN<br />
(vermicompost) replicated thrice. Vermicompost containing 1.8 % N was applied @ 5.5 and<br />
1.4 t ha -1 to supplement 100 kg and 25 kg N ha -1 in N3 and N2 treatments respectively. P2O5<br />
and K 2O @ 60 and 50 kg ha -1 respectively were applied uniformly to all plots. Irrigations based<br />
on IW/CPE ratio 1.0, 0.8 and 0.6 were given as per treatments when cumulative pan<br />
evaporation (CPE) reached at 50, 62.5 and 83.3 mm respectively and 50 mm depth <strong>of</strong> irrigation<br />
water was maintained in each irrigation. Seedlings <strong>of</strong> lettuce var. ‘Chinese Yellow’ were<br />
transplanted with a spacing <strong>of</strong> 40 cm × 30 cm in 4.8 m × 3.6 m plots with other management<br />
practices.<br />
Results<br />
Pooled results revealed that irrigation scheduled at 15 days interval along with 75% RDN from<br />
inorganic urea and 25% RDN from vermicompost treatment (I 1N 2) performed significantly<br />
better in terms <strong>of</strong> plant height (20.80 cm), fresh weight (681.55 g), yield (32.85 t ha -1 ) and<br />
water use efficiency (92.38 kg ha-mm -1 ), whereas, maximum no. <strong>of</strong> leaves plant -1 (52.89) was<br />
recorded in irrigation scheduled at 15 days interval along with 100% RDN from inorganic urea<br />
treatment (I1N1) which was statistically at par with I1N2. However, irrigation scheduled at<br />
IW/CPE 0.6 along with 100% RDN from inorganic urea treatment (I 2N 1) recorded lowest yield<br />
(18.15 t ha -1 ).<br />
Conclusion<br />
The study concluded that irrigation scheduled at 15 days interval along with 75% RDN from<br />
inorganic urea and 25% RDN from vermicompost can be recommended for better yield and<br />
water use efficiency in lettuce in New alluvial zone <strong>of</strong> West Bengal.<br />
Effects <strong>of</strong> irrigation and nitrogen sources on growth and yield <strong>of</strong> lettuce (Pooled)<br />
Treatment<br />
I 1 (Irrigation at<br />
15-day<br />
interval)<br />
Plant height<br />
(cm)<br />
No. <strong>of</strong> leaves<br />
plant -1<br />
Fresh weight<br />
plant -1 (g)<br />
Irrigation Level (I)<br />
Yield<br />
(t ha -1 )<br />
19.72 51.08 632.76 27.76<br />
Water use<br />
efficiency<br />
(kg ha-mm -1 )<br />
78.39<br />
64 | Page Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
I 2 (IW: CPE<br />
0.6)<br />
I 3 (IW: CPE<br />
0.8)<br />
I 4 (IW: CPE<br />
1.0)<br />
17.47 42.78 507.81 19.01<br />
18.36 43.66 531.04 20.88<br />
19.48 47.01 607.55 24.93<br />
S.Em (±) 0.21 0.36 5.43 0.95 --<br />
C. D. (P= 0.05) 0.74 1.26 18.80 3.27 --<br />
N 1(100% RDN<br />
inorganic urea)<br />
N 2(75% RDN<br />
(inorganic<br />
urea) +25%<br />
RDN<br />
(vermicompost)<br />
N 3 (100% RDN<br />
(vermicompost)<br />
Nitrogen Sources (N)<br />
18.42 47.48 573.57 23.70<br />
19.52 47.60 612.78 25.59<br />
18.34 42.73 523.03 19.92<br />
S.Em (±) 0.15 0.21 4.94 0.47 --<br />
C. D. (P= 0.05) 0.48 0.64 14.79 1.40 --<br />
Interaction (I× N)<br />
85.97<br />
79.77<br />
79.01<br />
83.04<br />
88.74<br />
70.58<br />
I 1N 1 19.35 52.89 628.12 27.96 81.13<br />
I 1N 2 20.80 52.40 681.55 32.85 92.38<br />
I 1N 3 19.03 47.99 588.64 21.57 61.67<br />
I 2N 1 16.13 42.68 486.53 18.15 81.53<br />
I 2N 2 18.39 44.12 547.93 20.03 90.66<br />
I 2N 3 17.89 41.56 488.98 18.84 85.72<br />
I 3N 1 18.07 45.13 517.96 19.93 77.58<br />
I 3N 2 19.40 45.56 603.73 23.89 91.74<br />
I 3N 3 17.63 40.31 471.44 18.81 69.98<br />
I 4N 1 20.14 49.17 661.66 28.76 91.93<br />
I 4N 2 19.50 48.33 617.92 25.57 80.16<br />
I 4N 3 18.81 43.56 543.08 20.47 64.95<br />
I×N N×I I×N N×I I×N N×I I×N N×I I×N N×I<br />
S.Em (±) 0.22 0.31 0.43 0.55 9.87 10.65 0.94 1.33 --<br />
C. D. (P= 0.05) 0.74 0.93 1.29 1.27 29.59 23.66 2.81 3.09 --<br />
Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance<br />
65 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
T1-21P-1145<br />
Effect <strong>of</strong> Irrigation and Mulch on Summer Babycorn (Zea mays L.) in New<br />
Alluvial Zone <strong>of</strong> West Bengal<br />
V.V.S. Jaya Krishna, Abhijit Saha and Dhananjoy Dutta<br />
Department <strong>of</strong> Agronomy, Bidhan Chandra Krishi Viswavidyalay,<br />
Mohanpur, Nadia, West Bengal, India-741252<br />
Optimization <strong>of</strong> irrigation schedules along with use <strong>of</strong> mulch is an effective moisture<br />
conservation technique for raising summer crops under limited water. Moreover, the use <strong>of</strong><br />
biodegradable mulches like jute based geo-textile, crop residues etc. has widely been accepted<br />
technology due to beneficial effects on soil. Hence, an attempt was being made to obtain higher<br />
yield and better quality <strong>of</strong> summer babycorn through efficient management <strong>of</strong> irrigation and<br />
mulches.<br />
Methodology<br />
Field investigation was conducted at BCKV, West Bengal during summer (March – May) <strong>of</strong><br />
2016 & 2017 to find out the growth, yield, nutrients uptake, quality, water use efficiency<br />
(WUE), economics and water stress index <strong>of</strong> babycorn (cv. G-5414) under different irrigation<br />
scheduling and mulching in a split-plot design with three irrigation treatments in main plot<br />
like IW/CPE 1.0, 0.80 & 0.60 and four mulch treatments in sub-plots such as no mulch, black<br />
polythene mulch (30 µ), paddy straw mulch @ 5t/ha and jute based geo-textile mulch @ 500<br />
gsm replicated thrice in sandy loam soil, neutral pH (6.52), medium fertility, field capacity <strong>of</strong><br />
18.58% and permanent wilting point <strong>of</strong> 8.1%. The crop was planted in raised-bed with 45 cm<br />
× 20 cm spacing and fertilized uniformly with 10 t FYM + N:P2O5: K2O @ 120: 60: 40 kg/ha<br />
as basal. Polythene and jute (geo-textile) sheets were placed over the bed before sowing and<br />
seeds are dibbled in wholes adjusted with the spacing, while straw mulch was applied 5-7 days<br />
after germination. Other standard agronomic package <strong>of</strong> practices was followed. Irrigation<br />
depth 5 cm was maintained by V notch.<br />
Results<br />
In respect to main effect <strong>of</strong> treatments, irrigation at IW/CPE 1.0 (I 1) and polythene mulch (M 1)<br />
was found superior than others and therefore, their interaction (I1M1) excelled other<br />
combinations in terms <strong>of</strong> growth attributes like plant height (208.38 cm), dry matter<br />
accumulation (1912.55 g/m 2 ) and yield attributes like cob no. /plant (2.22), cob weight without<br />
husk (8.36 g) and cob yield (2019 kg/ha), uptake <strong>of</strong> N (56.12 kg/ha), P2O5 (22.84 kg/ha) and<br />
K 2O (51.71 kg/ha), crude protein (15.98%), crude fibre (41.96%), consumptive water use<br />
efficiency (10.59 kg/ha-mm), net return (Rs. 161294/ha) and benefit-cost ratio (3.07).<br />
66 | Page Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Effect <strong>of</strong> irrigation and mulch on cob length with and without husk (pooled)<br />
Treatment<br />
Irrigation(I)<br />
Plant height<br />
(cm)<br />
Cob<br />
no./plant<br />
Cob yield<br />
(kg/ha)<br />
N uptake<br />
(kg/ha)<br />
Benefitcost<br />
ratio<br />
WUE (kg/hamm)<br />
I 1 (IW/CPE 1.0) 186.46 2.04 1618 41.55 2.67 8.83<br />
I 2 (IW/CPE 0.8) 179.21 1.92 1242 36.60 2.22 8.32<br />
I 3 (IW/CPE 0.6) 171.80 1.67 962 31.55 1.88 8.42<br />
CD at 5% 1.94 0.15 26.77 1.17<br />
Mulching (M)<br />
M 0 (No mulch) 159.49 1.71 918 25.42 2.25 6.48<br />
M 1 (Polythene<br />
mulch 30 µ)<br />
M 2 (Paddy straw<br />
mulch @ 5t/ha)<br />
M 3 (Jute mulch @<br />
500 gsm)<br />
198.00 2.06 1557 49.23<br />
176.55 1.76 1210 34.04<br />
182.60 1.98 1411 37.57<br />
CD at 5% 2.27 0.14 23.79 0.74<br />
Interaction<br />
2.57 9.98<br />
2.44 8.28<br />
1.77 9.28<br />
I 1M 0 166.21 1.84 1064 29.10 2.58 6.34<br />
I 1M 1 208.38 2.22 2019 56.12 3.07 10.59<br />
I 1M 2 182.17 1.95 1586 38.54 2.95 8.56<br />
I 1M 3 189.09 2.17 1803 42.44 2.09 9.51<br />
I 2M 0 160.44 1.78 914 25.24 2.25 6.23<br />
I 2M 1 197.40 2.11 1529 49.11 2.54 9.82<br />
I 2M 2 176.93 1.78 1133 34.14 2.35 7.99<br />
I 2M 3 182.08 2.00 1392 37.89 1.75 9.12<br />
I 3M 0 151.81 1.50 776 21.93 1.92 7.04<br />
I 3M 1 188.20 1.84 1124 42.45 2.10 9.22<br />
I 3M 2 170.56 1.56 911 29.44 2.03 8.19<br />
I 3M 3 176.63 1.78 1037 32.37 1.46 9.12<br />
I×M M×I I×M M×I I×M M×I I×M M×I<br />
CD at 5% 3.94 3.92 NS NS 41.21 44.53 1.28 1.59<br />
Conclusion<br />
Irrigation at IW/CPE 1.0 along with polythene mulching can be recommended for enhancing<br />
productivity, pr<strong>of</strong>itability and water use efficiency <strong>of</strong> summer babycorn in West Bengal.<br />
Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance<br />
67 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
T1-22P-1197<br />
Enhancing Water Productivity in the Scarce Rainfall Zone <strong>of</strong> Andhra<br />
Pradesh through Farmponds with Seepage Control<br />
Boini Narsimlu 1 , N. Kishore, 2 , Sahadeva Reddy 2 , G. Ravindra Chary 1 , K.B. Sridhar 1<br />
and K.A. Gopinath 1<br />
1 ICAR-Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, Hyderabad-500059, Telangana.<br />
2 AICRPDA centre, Acharya N G Ranga Agricultural University, Ananthapuramu-515001, A.P<br />
Rainfed agriculture in India accounts for about 51% (72.98 m ha) <strong>of</strong> the net cultivated area,<br />
supports 40% <strong>of</strong> total food grain production, 60% <strong>of</strong> livestock population and is mainly<br />
depends on rainfall. It is mainly monsoon reliant, risk prone and <strong>of</strong>ten encounters extreme<br />
variations in rainfall resulting in wide variation and instability in crop yields. Rainfed area<br />
covered in Andhra Pradesh is about 67% (25.03 lakh ha) and in scarce rainfall zone it is about<br />
72% (14.88 lakh ha) area. This scarce rainfall zone is drought prone which is characterized by<br />
inadequate and erratic rainfall coupled with high evapotranspiration rate and eroded soils.<br />
Water harvesting is an ancient tradition and used for millennia in most dry lands <strong>of</strong> the world;<br />
many different techniques were developed. The on-farm run<strong>of</strong>f collection into farm ponds and<br />
recycling through supplemental irrigation can increase and stabilize the crop production. There<br />
is an abundant scope and opportunity for harvesting excess run<strong>of</strong>f in the rainfed region in<br />
different states <strong>of</strong> the country. In a case study a farm pond with capacity <strong>of</strong> 50 m 3 , by using<br />
drip system irrigation system, it is adequate to meet supplemental irrigation requirement for a<br />
kitchen garden <strong>of</strong> 300– 600 m 2 planted with 90 days growing period cabbages. The cost-benefit<br />
analysis showed that farm ponds are feasible solutions to persistent crop failures in semi-arid<br />
areas (Ngigi et al., 2005). Harvested rainwater in farm pond will be able to provide life-saving<br />
irrigation to standing crops when they are exposed to mid-term/terminal drought and also for<br />
pre-sowing irrigation in post-rainy crops in rainfed areas. Study results on Nadi system<br />
established under RKVY scheme in Bhilwara district during the year 2011–2013 indicates an<br />
increased the water productivity by 28 to 48.5% in both the seasons (Jat et al., 2016). The<br />
objectives are to study the performance and economics <strong>of</strong> lined vis-à-vis unlined farm ponds<br />
and to assess the efficacy <strong>of</strong> lining material used in farm ponds in minimizing the seepage<br />
losses across different zones.<br />
Methodology<br />
Study area is in scarce rainfall zone <strong>of</strong> Andhra Pradesh State and is under arid (hot) climate<br />
with mean annual rainfall <strong>of</strong> 544 mm. The dominant soils <strong>of</strong> the region are alfisols (red soils)<br />
and few black soil packets with predominant groundnut based rainfed production system.<br />
Major crops grown during kharif season area groundnut, pigeonpea, maize, sunflower, rice,<br />
cotton and in rabi finger millet and chickpea. The farm holding size <strong>of</strong> the regions is small and<br />
68 | Page Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
marginal farmers counting to 70 percent. A large number <strong>of</strong> farm ponds were dug with the<br />
support <strong>of</strong> programmes such as State Government special program <strong>of</strong> 1.0 lakh farm ponds for<br />
enhancing groundwater recharge, MGNREGA and watershed development programmes,<br />
NGO’s (RDT) introduced and ICAR-NICRA programmes in the study area. On-farm data was<br />
collected through inventory <strong>of</strong> farm ponds in farmers’ fields to assess the benefits <strong>of</strong> different<br />
lining material used for seepage control and effective utilisation <strong>of</strong> harvested rainwater in<br />
scarce rainfall zone. Data attributes like size <strong>of</strong> farm pond, lining material used and availability,<br />
water harvested, seepage losses, crops grown etc., were recorded and analysed for benefit cost<br />
ratio.<br />
Without lining HPDE 250 GSM lining Soil cement lining 4:1 ratio Soil cement lining 6:1<br />
Results<br />
Inventory results samples collected from locations which were identified with GPS includes<br />
lined and unlined farm ponds in Ananthapuramu district <strong>of</strong> A.P. The lining material used by<br />
farmers are HDPE sheet <strong>of</strong> 250, 300 and 500 microns, LDPE, Bricks+cement, local<br />
stoneslabs+cement and soil +cement in 8:1 ratio for seepage control and effective utilisation.<br />
On-farm inventory in the scarce rainfall zone with annual average rainfall <strong>of</strong> 544 mm under<br />
arid alfisols in Andhra Pradesh, among the different seepage control methods used, a farm pond<br />
with capacity <strong>of</strong> 250 m 3 , under 1 ha catchment with soil+cement (6:1) lining was efficiently<br />
used (two irrigation <strong>of</strong> 1.0 cm each) during dry spells on groundnut crop. The crop productivity<br />
by lined farm pond is 1230 kg/ha, when compared to 820 kg/ha from unlined farm pond. The<br />
constraints observed during the study for sustainability <strong>of</strong> farm ponds in these agroclimatic<br />
zones are exposure <strong>of</strong> material to high temperature, physical damage by animals, poor<br />
maintenance <strong>of</strong> lining material, availability <strong>of</strong> run<strong>of</strong>f during the <strong>of</strong>fseason etc.<br />
Conclusions<br />
In the scarce rainfall zone with annual average rainfall <strong>of</strong> 544 mm under arid alfisols in Andhra<br />
Pradesh, shows among the different seepage control methods used, a farm pond with capacity<br />
<strong>of</strong> 250 m 3 , under 1 ha catchment with soil+cement (6:1) lining was efficiently used (two<br />
irrigation <strong>of</strong> 1.0 cm each) during dry spells on groundnut crop. The crop productivity by lined<br />
farm pond was 1230 kg/ha, when compared to 820 kg/ha from unlined farm pond. Farm pond<br />
are found suitable to address the issue <strong>of</strong> water scarcity by storing excess <strong>of</strong> canal water as well<br />
as rainfall for applying to field as and when required. The major constraints observed in this<br />
Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance<br />
69 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
study was exposure <strong>of</strong> lining material to high temperature and unavailability <strong>of</strong> run<strong>of</strong>f during<br />
<strong>of</strong>fseason.<br />
References<br />
Jat, M. and Mahela. M. 2016. Economic feasibility <strong>of</strong> refinement or renovation <strong>of</strong> a water<br />
harvesting structure (Nadi)-Asuccess story. Indian J. Soil Conserv., 46(1): 60–67.<br />
Ngigi, S.N., Savenije, H.H.G., Thome, J.N., Rockström, J., De Vries, F.W.T.P. 2005. Agrohydrological<br />
evaluation <strong>of</strong> on-farm rainwater storage systems for supplemental<br />
irrigation in Laikipia district, Kenya. Agric. Water Manage., 73: 21–41.<br />
T1-23P-1198<br />
Maximize the Production <strong>of</strong> Blackgram Through Furrow Irrigated Raised<br />
Bed Planting Methods Under Aberrated Climatic Regions<br />
R.K. Singh 1 , S.R.K. Singh 2 and D.P. Sharma 3<br />
1 Directore ATARI Zone IX and 4 Director Extension Services<br />
Jawaharlal Nehru Krishi Vishwa Vidyalaya, Krishi Vigyan Kendra Chhatarpur- 471201, M.P.<br />
Blackgram (Vigna mungo.) is an important economic pulse crop and considered as a good<br />
source <strong>of</strong> protein for human being. Blackgram has been a predominant crop in Madhya<br />
Pradesh especially in Chhatarpur district which accounts for 65.1% (2, 61,450 ha) area under<br />
Blackgram Cultivation. The district Chhatarpur falls under central portion on the plateau <strong>of</strong><br />
Bundelkhand region in Madhya Pradesh. and lies between north latitudes 240 06’ and 250<br />
20’ and longitude 790 59’ and 800 26 East. Current average productivity <strong>of</strong> the crop in the<br />
district is 540 kg per ha as against the state and national productivity <strong>of</strong> 730 and 585 kg per<br />
ha respectively. Though there are several factors for low production and productivity <strong>of</strong><br />
blackgram in the district, however, lower seed replacement with improved varieties and<br />
uncertainty <strong>of</strong> rainfall is crucial one. Because climate change during the last decade, the<br />
rainfall pattern and distribution has exhibited frequent aberrations with extreme situation <strong>of</strong><br />
sudden downpour or long dry spells entailing in to severe stress on blackgram crop that results<br />
reduction in yield. Keeping the above facts, the act <strong>of</strong> Furrow Irrigated Raised Bed Planter<br />
and improved variety <strong>of</strong> blackgram PU 31 and IPU 2-43 strategies for minimizing risk <strong>of</strong> crop<br />
failure and stabilizing blackgram production was felt. Under such circumstances, KVK<br />
Chhatarpur <strong>of</strong> Madhya Pradesh introduced Furrrow Irrigated raised bed planter equipment to<br />
line sowing <strong>of</strong> Blackgram through front line demonstration at farmer’s field under NICRA<br />
Village. These demonstrations brought out enhancement in yield <strong>of</strong> Blackgram as 7.5 q/ha<br />
over farmers practice 4.2 q/ha. The benefit cost ratio was recorded as 1: 2.6 as compared to<br />
farmers practices 1:1.7. The ridge and furrow equipment save the soil moisture through<br />
70 | Page Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
increased infiltration rate <strong>of</strong> rain fall and reduced run<strong>of</strong>f that leads slow rate <strong>of</strong> soil erosion.<br />
The furrow which allows drainage <strong>of</strong> excess water in case <strong>of</strong> heavy precipitation, while serves<br />
as in situ moisture conservation during dry spells, thus mitigating the detrimental effects <strong>of</strong><br />
excess and dry spell situation.<br />
T1-24P-1229<br />
Integrating Improved Land, Water Management Practices and Cropping<br />
Systems for Sustainable Farming in Drylands <strong>of</strong> Northern Karnataka: A<br />
Case Study<br />
M. S. Shirahatti 1 , V.S. Surakod 1 , S.G. Kanti 1 , H.S. Patil 1 and G. Ravindra Chary 2<br />
1 AICRP on Dryland Agriculture, Vijayapura, Karnataka<br />
2 ICAR - CRIDA, Hyderabad – 500 059, Telangana<br />
The total amount <strong>of</strong> rainfall in the semi-arid tropics (SAT) regions is adequate to meet the water<br />
requirement <strong>of</strong> the crops and cropping systems, its erratic distribution results in periods <strong>of</strong><br />
excess and deficit water availability, leading to low productivity and degradation <strong>of</strong> natural<br />
resources. In recent years, due to climate change, the weather aberrations such as delayed onset<br />
<strong>of</strong> monsoon, prolonged dry spells and high rainfall events during the crop growth period have<br />
become common, thereby reducing the yields <strong>of</strong> rainfed crops. Under the climate change<br />
scenario, the number <strong>of</strong> rainy days is decreased, but rainfall intensity increases. Therefore, an<br />
integrated water resources management approach comprising in-situ water conservation,<br />
harvesting <strong>of</strong> excess water in ponds and groundwater recharging and its efficient use through<br />
appropriate supplemental irrigation methods, improved crop varieties and cropping systems,<br />
balanced nutrition <strong>of</strong> crops, crop diversification and intensification with high value crops and<br />
crop protection is needed to produce more food and income per unit <strong>of</strong> rainfall.<br />
Methodology<br />
The Northern Dry zone <strong>of</strong> Karnataka falls in the semi-arid tropics, annual rainfall is low and<br />
erratic (LPA <strong>of</strong> 594 mm and CV <strong>of</strong> 30%). High insolation (18.9-21.0 MJ/m 2 /day) and high<br />
wind speed during mid kharif season (20 km/hr) cause annual potential evaporation (1,574<br />
mm) that far exceeds rainfall, leading to 988 mm <strong>of</strong> water deficit and aridity index <strong>of</strong> 62%. The<br />
rainfall and run<strong>of</strong>f studies revealed that generally there would be 5 to 6 run<strong>of</strong>f events occurring<br />
in the year, and a minimum 22 mm rainfall is required for the occurrence <strong>of</strong> the run<strong>of</strong>f. Long<br />
term run<strong>of</strong>f data analysis revealed that annual run<strong>of</strong>f would be about 12-14 per cent <strong>of</strong> the<br />
annual rainfall. Further, the ground water balance study revealed that ground water recharge<br />
normally occurs during September and October months. The annual ground water recharge is<br />
about 8 % <strong>of</strong> the annual rainfall. 80 per cent <strong>of</strong> the soil is shallow to medium to deep black soil.<br />
The infiltration rate <strong>of</strong> the black cotton soil is low and 1-2% slope is prevailed in the area,<br />
which gives the less opportunity time for infiltration.<br />
Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance<br />
71 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Under the DARE, GoI, SFC funded project, during 2013-15, Honwad village, was selected<br />
from the Vijayapura district. SWC structures (bunds, farm ponds) were constructed in 500 ha<br />
area <strong>of</strong> project village, also other dry land practices were demonstrated and custom hire service<br />
centre was established. Under the project, the largescale demonstrations at the micro watershed<br />
level with the farmers’ participation comprising in-situ water conservation, harvesting <strong>of</strong><br />
excess water in ponds and groundwater recharging and its efficient use through appropriate<br />
supplemental irrigation methods, improved crop varieties, cropping systems were conducted<br />
in the farmers’ fields <strong>of</strong> the Honwad village. The Honwad village is located about 25 kilometers<br />
from the Vijayapura city.<br />
A. Soil and water conservation works undertaken at Honwad micro-watershed<br />
The graded bund, Zing conservation, Pipe outlet, Waste weir, Farm Pond and Open well<br />
recharge structures were constructed at Honwad micro watershed.<br />
a. Zing conservation: The concept <strong>of</strong> contour bunding is widely practiced to conserve in-situ<br />
rain water. The practice <strong>of</strong> contour bunding could be slightly modified by leveling 1/3 or<br />
1/4 area on the upstream side <strong>of</strong> the bund to form a zing terrace. The leveled portion <strong>of</strong> zing<br />
conservation helps to increase the water spread area and provides more opportunity time<br />
for the rain water to percolate in. The increased moisture retention in-situ helps the crops<br />
to yield more in years <strong>of</strong> normal rainfall. The impact is more pronounced during sub normal<br />
rainfall years. It also provides opportunities for double cropping in the leveled portions.<br />
The high value and horticultural crops could be successfully raised in the leveled portions.<br />
In the unleveled areas drought crops may be grown.<br />
b. Farmpond: During the year 2013-14, two farmponds were dug in the micro-watershed<br />
each measuring 23 X 17 X 3 m (1198 cum & 1211.62 cum), which were not only the source<br />
<strong>of</strong> drinking water for the people and animals living around ponds but also providing water<br />
for taking up sprays to control pests by the farmers in the area. When there were no<br />
expectations <strong>of</strong> rains after the sowing <strong>of</strong> sorghum, the irrigation provided from the ponds<br />
with the 1.5 HP petrol start-diesel run pump and sprinkler system saved the sorghum and<br />
bengalgram crop. The ponds were full with the receipt <strong>of</strong> first rains. It was refilled with the<br />
receipt <strong>of</strong> subsequent rains. Till the end <strong>of</strong> February 2015, more than 50% <strong>of</strong> water was<br />
available to use.<br />
c. Open well recharge: The run<strong>of</strong>f from the nearby nala was diverted to the open well<br />
through the filter. This technique was initiated at two locations to demonstrate the<br />
importance <strong>of</strong> open well recharge to enhance the farm productivity by providing<br />
supplemental irrigations at crops critical stages. With the receipt <strong>of</strong> first rains, the open well<br />
was recharged with water up to 20 ft, while the second rain filled the open well completely.<br />
This water was sufficient to irrigate two acres. Till now the well was full for seven times.<br />
72 | Page Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
It helped to irrigate crops especially during summer. It was witnessed in the increase in<br />
amount <strong>of</strong> water in the nearby bore wells. The quality <strong>of</strong> water improved now compared to<br />
earlier times. The water table too increased in the area surrounding open well.<br />
d. Graded bunds also reduce the run<strong>of</strong>f velocity and there by enhance in-situ rain water<br />
harvesting.<br />
e. Pipe outlet and waste weir: These structures act as safe rainwater disposal units, if rainfall<br />
received in high intensity.<br />
Results<br />
i. Compartment bunding: An in-situ conservation practice <strong>of</strong> “Compartment bunding” was<br />
developed by the AICRP, Centre, Vijayapura, Karnataka. After receipt <strong>of</strong> few showers in June-<br />
July 2013, land was harrowed to remove germinating weeds. Compartment bunds were<br />
demonstrated over an area <strong>of</strong> 23 ha covering 25 farmers’ fields in which observations on yield<br />
impact were recorded in 8 demonstrations under compartment bunding. After adoption <strong>of</strong><br />
compartment bunding in safflower, sunflower and chickpea they have recorded yield advantage<br />
<strong>of</strong> 16.70, 79.80 and 12.07 per cent respectively over no compartment bunding or flat planting.<br />
ii. Crop varietal demonstrations: The new crop variety in various crops viz., rabi sorghum<br />
(DSV-4), sunflower (KBSH-53) & chickpea (JG-11) were demonstrated as a sole crop as well<br />
intercropping systems. The results revealed that the yield advantage <strong>of</strong> 10.55 to 41.67 per cent<br />
in case <strong>of</strong> introduction <strong>of</strong> new crop varieties. During 2014-15, effect <strong>of</strong> SWC structures and<br />
improved varieties on crop productivity was measured by recording yields <strong>of</strong> five principle<br />
crops from demonstration farmers, ten non-demonstration watershed farmers benefitted from<br />
SWC structures and ten outside watershed farmers and the average was worked out. The<br />
highest per cent increase <strong>of</strong> demonstration yields over non-demonstration in watershed was<br />
13.53 in sunflower followed by wheat (11.40), safflower (9.65), sorghum (9.40) and<br />
bengalgram (7.88) while the per cent increase <strong>of</strong> watershed demonstration over outside<br />
watershed ranged from 18.33 (sorghum) to 33.50 (sunflower).<br />
iii. Demonstration on intercropping systems: The intercropping systems viz., sorghum+<br />
chickpea (2:4), chickpea + safflower (4:2) were introduced in the form <strong>of</strong> demonstrations in<br />
which intercropping systems recorded 160 and 18.05 per cent higher yield advantage over sole<br />
cropping.<br />
Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance<br />
73 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Effect <strong>of</strong> SWC structures and improved varieties on crop productivity (2014-15)<br />
Crop<br />
Outside<br />
watershed<br />
Nondemonstration<br />
Watershed<br />
Demonstration<br />
Per cent<br />
increase <strong>of</strong><br />
demonstration<br />
over non-demo<br />
in watershed<br />
Per cent<br />
increase <strong>of</strong><br />
watershed<br />
demonstration<br />
over outside<br />
watershed<br />
Bengalgram 1350 1585 1710 7.88 26.66<br />
Sunflower 961 1130 1283 13.53 33.50<br />
Sorghum 1396 1510 1652 9.40 18.33<br />
Safflower 920 1088 1193 9.65 29.67<br />
Wheat 1337 1508 1680 11.40 25.65<br />
Conclusion<br />
An integrated water resources management approach comprising in-situ water conservation<br />
measures including both inter terrace and terrace level practices, harvesting <strong>of</strong> excess water in<br />
ponds and groundwater recharging, improved crop varieties and improved inter-cropping<br />
systems produce more food and income per unit <strong>of</strong> rainfall.<br />
T1-25P-1265<br />
Effect <strong>of</strong> Supplemental Irrigation on Yield and Economics <strong>of</strong> Different<br />
Pulse and Oilseed Crops under Dryland Condition in Palamau Region <strong>of</strong><br />
Jharkhand<br />
Nargis Kumari, Mintu Job, D.N. Singh, Abhishek Patel and Asha Kumari Sinha<br />
All India Coordinated Research Project on Dryland agriculture, Chianki,<br />
Birsa Agricultural University, Ranchi- 834 006, Jharkhand<br />
Rainfed agriculture is the main feature <strong>of</strong> Jharkhand state and rice is the most important crop<br />
in major part <strong>of</strong> eastern India comprising Assam, West Bengal, Jharkhand, Orissa, Chhattisgarh<br />
and eastern UP during the kharif and growing second crops in rice - fallow after rice harvesting<br />
during rabi, soil moisture availability is the main limiting factor for growing second crops in<br />
rainfed rice fallows <strong>of</strong> eastern India (Kar et al., 2006). In view <strong>of</strong> rapid increase in population<br />
and day by day decrease in water resources and to fulfill the increasing pulse demand and<br />
decreasing pulse production; sustainable water management practices and estimation <strong>of</strong> water<br />
requirement will help to increase productivity <strong>of</strong> pulses, water productivity, water use<br />
efficiency and area <strong>of</strong> pulses under irrigation. Improving water use efficiency in agriculture<br />
will require an increase in crop water productivity i.e., an increase in marketable crop yield per<br />
unit <strong>of</strong> water used by plant and reduction in water losses from the crop root zone. Among the<br />
sustainable water management practices, scheduling irrigation based on evaporation is one <strong>of</strong><br />
the best methods in semi-arid condition where annual rainfall is low. Crop water requirement<br />
is the total water needed for evapotranspiration, from planting to harvest for a given crop in a<br />
74 | Page Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
specific climate regime, when adequate soil moisture maintained by rainfall and/or irrigation<br />
so that it does not limit plant growth and crop yield. The assessment <strong>of</strong> water needs <strong>of</strong> the crop<br />
based on day-to-day weather parameters seems to be more rational than any other method in<br />
agricultural fields, large spatial variations in soil water content are associated with soil<br />
heterogeneities such as precipitation level, land cover, topography, evapotranspiration etc.<br />
Keeping this in view, the present investigation “yield and economics <strong>of</strong> pulses and oilseed as<br />
influenced by irrigation levels in Dry Zone <strong>of</strong> Jharkhand” was taken up during kharif 2020 and<br />
2021 at Zonal Research Station, Palamau, Jharkhand.<br />
Methodology<br />
The experiment was conducted in split plot design during winter season for two consecutive<br />
years from 2020-21 & 2021-2022 having three levels <strong>of</strong> supplemental irrigation one irrigation<br />
at Pre- flowering stage at 50-60 DAS (I1), One irrigation at pre - Pod formation at 60-70 DAS<br />
( I 2 ) & combinations <strong>of</strong> both (I 3) to provide lifesaving irrigation at critical stages <strong>of</strong> different<br />
pulse and oilseed crops viz.C1 - Chickpea, C2 – Lentil, C3 - Linseed and C4 – Safflower at Zonal<br />
Research Station, Chianki (Palamau) under All India Coordinated Research Project on Dryland<br />
agriculture <strong>of</strong> Birsa Agricultural University, Ranchi (Jharkhand).The soil was sandy loam in<br />
texture, with pH 5.6, organic carbon 0.47%, available nitrogen 265.4 kg ha -1 , phosphorus 14.7<br />
kg ha -1 and potassium 175.2 kg ha -1 .<br />
Results<br />
Different rabi pulse and oilseed crops were compared in respect <strong>of</strong> irrigation levels ie.<br />
supplemental irrigation at different crop development stage. Significantly higher mean seed<br />
yield (1141 kg ha -1 ) was recorded when two supplemental irrigations (I3) were supplied to the<br />
crop ie 1 st at Pre- flowering stage (50-60 DAS) and 2 nd at Pre -pod formation stage (60-70<br />
DAS). Similarly, maximum Net return (Rs.29111 ha -1 ), B:C ratio (1.81) and RWUE (40.49 kg<br />
ha -1 mm -1 ) were obtained with I3 which showed its superiority over irrigation level I1& I2.<br />
Among different pulse and oilseed crops, results revealed that maximum mean seed yield (1073<br />
kg ha -1 ) was exhibited by Chickpea crop which was significantly superior to safflower yield<br />
but at par with lentil (919 kg ha -1 ) & linseed yield (914 kg ha -1 ). Similarly, higher mean value<br />
<strong>of</strong> Net return (29697Rs. ha -1 ) & RWUE (38.16kg ha -1 mm -1 ) but B:C ration was higher in lentil<br />
crop (2.06) it might be due to differences in cost <strong>of</strong> cultivation.<br />
Conclusion<br />
The treatment combination <strong>of</strong> irrigation provides to life saving irrigation at critical stages <strong>of</strong><br />
chickpea recorded a significantly higher yield 1141 kg ha-1 than the rest <strong>of</strong> the combinations.<br />
Hence scheduling irrigation (I 3) in pulses enhances growth and yield in rainfed areas <strong>of</strong><br />
Jharkhand.<br />
Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance<br />
75 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Effect <strong>of</strong> irrigation levels on productivity and pr<strong>of</strong>itability <strong>of</strong> different pulse and oilseed<br />
crops under dryland conditions<br />
Treatment Seed yield (kg ha -1 ) Net return (Rs. ha -1 ) B: C ratio<br />
Irrigation level<br />
I 1 816 17302 1.42<br />
I 2 830 18618 1.49<br />
I 3 1141 29111 1.81<br />
SEm± 25.12 1420.23 0.04<br />
CD (P=0.05) 101.27 5725.86 0.18<br />
Crops<br />
Chickpea 1073 29697 1.67<br />
Lentil 919 28483 2.06<br />
Linseed 915 3159 0.63<br />
Safflower 809 25369 1.93<br />
SEm± 29.01 1012.23 0.05<br />
CD (P=0.05) 86.86 3030.80 0.14<br />
References<br />
Kar, G., Verma, H.N. and Singh, R. 2006. Effects <strong>of</strong> winter crop and supplemental irrigation<br />
on crop yield, water use efficiency and pr<strong>of</strong>itability in rainfed rice-based cropping<br />
system <strong>of</strong> eastern India. Agric. Water Manage., 79: 280–292.<br />
Todorovic, M. 2005. Crop water requirements. In: Water Encyclopedia: Surface and<br />
Agricultural Water (Jay H. Lehr, Jack Keeley, Eds.), AW-59, p. 557-558, John Wiley<br />
& Sons Publisher, USA<br />
T1-26P-1275<br />
Water Use, Yield and Economics <strong>of</strong> Maize as Influenced by Drip Irrigation<br />
Schedules and Nitrogen Levels<br />
Y. Deepthi Kiran, V. Sumathi and G. Prabhakara Reddy<br />
Department <strong>of</strong> Agronomy, S.V.Agricultural College, Acharya N.G. Ranga Agricultural University,<br />
Tirupati-517 502, Andhra Pradesh, India<br />
Water and nitrogen are two important resources for crop production. Yields in maize respond<br />
positively with an increase in the amount <strong>of</strong> water and nitrogen applied and reaches the plateau<br />
at their optimum doses. Hence, the present study was under taken to examine the appropriate<br />
irrigation schedule through drip as well as nitrogen application rate.<br />
76 | Page Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Methodology<br />
The field experiment was conducted for two consecutive years (2013-14 and 2014-15) to<br />
evaluate the water use, yield and economic returns from maize under different irrigation<br />
schedules and nitrogen levels at S.V. Agricultural College, wet land farm, Tirupati, Andhra<br />
Pradesh. The experiment was laid out in split-plot design and replicated thrice. The treatments<br />
comprised <strong>of</strong> four main plots viz., M1 (drip irrigation at 0.7 IW/CPE ratio), M2 (drip irrigation<br />
at 0.8 IW/CPE ratio), M 3 (drip irrigation at 0.9 IW/CPE ratio) and M 4 (weekly check basin<br />
irrigation) and three sub plots viz., N 1 (160 kg N ha -1 ), N 2 (200 kg N ha -1 ) and N 3 (240 kg N<br />
ha -1 ). To schedule the drip irrigation at prescribed IW/CPE ratios the treatments were<br />
maintained to field capacity in the top 0-45 cm depth i.e. only effective root zone depth,<br />
whereas for check basin irrigation the depth <strong>of</strong> water was 50 cm.<br />
Results<br />
The study revealed that significantly, higher water use efficiency was recorded with irrigation<br />
through drip at 0.9 IW/CPE ratio, but the yield and economics <strong>of</strong> maize were found to be higher<br />
with weekly check basin method, which were on par to that obtained with drip irrigation at 0.9<br />
IW/CPE ratio (Table 1&2). With regard to nitrogen levels tried, water use efficiency, yield and<br />
economics were found to be superior with the nitrogen dose <strong>of</strong> 240 kg N ha -1 . This might be<br />
due to the better availability <strong>of</strong> nutrients under higher soil moisture and at high nitrogen<br />
conditions which might have increased the crop growth and translocation <strong>of</strong> photosynthates<br />
from source to sink. The benefit from per rupee investment, gross and net returns were higher<br />
with drip irrigation scheduled at 0.9 IW/CPE ratio.<br />
Water use and yield <strong>of</strong> maize as influenced by drip irrigation schedules and nitrogen<br />
levels<br />
Treatment<br />
M 1 : 0.7 IW/CPE under<br />
drip irrigation<br />
M 2 : 0.8 IW/CPE under<br />
drip irrigation<br />
M 3 : 0.9 IW/CPE under<br />
drip irrigation<br />
Water use efficiency<br />
(kg ha-mm -1 )<br />
Kernel yield (kg ha -1 )<br />
2013-14 2014-15 2013-14 2014-15<br />
Irrigation schedules<br />
11.7 12.2 2582 2717<br />
14.7 14.9 3774 3813<br />
16.4 16.5 4572 4525<br />
M 4 : Weekly check basin 12.9 12.4 4630 4724<br />
Nitrogen levels<br />
N 1 : 160 kg ha -1 11.5 11.8 3177 3289<br />
N 1 : 200 kg ha -1 14.9 14.7 4166 4170<br />
Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance<br />
77 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
N 1 : 240 kg ha -1 15.3 15.3 4326 4376<br />
SEm± CD SEm± CD SEm± CD SEm± CD<br />
M 0.43 1.53 0.54 1.91 128 453 141 498<br />
N 0.12 0.37 0.21 0.63 34 102 40 122<br />
Mat N 0.48 NS 0.64 NS 140 482 155 536<br />
N at M 0.75 NS 0.94 NS 223 234 244 278<br />
(CD at P=0.05)<br />
Among the nitrogen levels, monetary returns were higher with 240 kg N ha -1 . The interaction<br />
between the irrigation schedules and nitrogen levels indicated that higher yield and monetary<br />
returns were observed with scheduling irrigation either by weekly check basin method or by<br />
drip irrigation at 0.9 IW/CPE ratio along with 240 kg N ha -1 , but the water use efficiency was<br />
found to be non-significant. The highest water use efficiency yield, monetary returns under<br />
higher irrigation regimes <strong>of</strong> 0.9 IW/CPE ratio through drip and weekly irrigations using check<br />
basin method along with higher nitrogen doses might be due to increased kernel yields under<br />
favourable moisture conditions coupled with ample supply <strong>of</strong> nitrogen. Similar evidences were<br />
reported by Krishnasamy et al., (2012).<br />
Economics <strong>of</strong> maize as influenced by drip irrigation schedules and nitrogen levels<br />
Treatment<br />
Gross returns (Rs. ha -1 ) Net returns (Rs. ha -1 )<br />
Returns per rupee invested<br />
(Rs. ha -1 )<br />
2013-14 2014-15 2013-14 2014-15 2013-14 2014-15<br />
Irrigation schedules<br />
M 1 : 0.7<br />
IW/CPE<br />
under drip<br />
irrigation 68993 72176 20922 24105 1.43 1.50<br />
M 2 : 0.8<br />
IW/CPE<br />
under drip<br />
irrigation 90033 91718 41301 42986 1.85 1.88<br />
M 3 : 0.9<br />
IW/CPE<br />
under drip<br />
irrigation 104311 104298 54919 54906 2.11 2.11<br />
M 4 :<br />
Weekly<br />
check<br />
basin 105717 108164 52863 54308 2.00 2.01<br />
N 1 : 160 kg<br />
ha -1<br />
N 1 : 200 kg<br />
ha -1<br />
N 1 : 240 kg<br />
ha -1<br />
Nitrogen levels<br />
79332 82119 30065 32601 1.61 1.65<br />
97151 97986 47388 47973 1.95 1.95<br />
100307 102162 50050 51654 1.99 2.02<br />
78 | Page Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
SEm± CD SEm± CD SEm± CD SEm± CD SEm± CD SEm± CD<br />
M 2246 7923 2455 8663 2246 7923 2455 8663 0.045 0.16 0.049 0.17<br />
N 596 1804 727 2200 596 1804 727 2200 0.012 0.04 0.015 0.04<br />
Mat N 2448 8441 2728 9363 2448 8441 2728 9363 0.049 0.17 0.055 0.19<br />
N at M 3890 8246 4253 9016 3890 8246 4253 9016 0.078 0.17 0.085 0.18<br />
(CD at P=0.05)<br />
Conclusion<br />
From the findings <strong>of</strong> the investigation, it can be concluded that scheduling irrigation by drip at<br />
0.9 IW/CPE ratio along with 240 kg N ha -1 is suitable combination for maximizing the yields<br />
<strong>of</strong> maize with higher WUE.<br />
References<br />
Krishnasamy, S., Mahendran, P.P., Gurusamy, A and Babu, R. 2012. Optimization <strong>of</strong> nutrients<br />
for hybrid maize under drip fertigation system. Madras Agric. J., 99(10-12): 799-802.<br />
T1-27P-1290<br />
Jalkund Low Cost Rain Water Harvesting and Utilization for Rabi Season<br />
Vegetable Production in Rabitar, Namchi District, Sikkim, India<br />
Indra Prashad Shivakoti, Basant Tamang, Nissi Gurung, Pravesh Shivakoty, Karma<br />
Peden Kaleon, Chewang Norbu Bhutia, Yangchenla Bhutia<br />
KVK, South Sikkim, Namchi District-737132, Sikkim<br />
kvknamthang@gmail.com<br />
Rain water harvesting has been practiced for many years in several regions globally and is<br />
mainly used for domestic or agricultural purposes. Various studies on rainwater harvesting in<br />
dry or tropical areas <strong>of</strong> growing and developing countries for agricultural use have proved its<br />
benefits such as an increase in crop yields and facilitated benefits to high-value crops. A lowcost<br />
technology for water harvesting structure Jalkund was demonstrated having dimensions<br />
5mx3mx1m was conducted at NICRA adopted village Rabitar, Namchi district, South Sikkim.<br />
The average supply from each Jalkund was about 15,000 L water. In the present study an<br />
approach to economical integrated ways <strong>of</strong> farming system was demonstrated to 10 numbers<br />
<strong>of</strong> farming families in the Village. The top most priority <strong>of</strong> the present study was to way out<br />
the source <strong>of</strong> water for meeting minimum critical water needs for post monsoon Rabi season<br />
vegetable production. Rainwater harvesting has great potential to achieve sustainable<br />
agriculture.<br />
Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance<br />
79 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
T1-28P-1321<br />
Economic Feasibility <strong>of</strong> Farm Ponds: A case study <strong>of</strong> Drainage Line<br />
Treatment Scheme in Wayanad District, Kerala<br />
S. Lokesh 1 , P. Indira Devi 2 , A. Prema 2 and C.A. Rama Rao 1<br />
1 ICAR- Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, Hyderabad – 500 059, Telangana<br />
2 Kerala Agricultural University Thrissur, Kerala<br />
The growing population and changes in the dietary habit <strong>of</strong> people are driving the growing<br />
demand for food crops. The agriculture industry is struggling to achieve the required<br />
production, as natural resources, viz., soil, water and biodiversity, are depleting over the<br />
decades. In addition to this, Climate Change is widening the demand-supply gap by triggering<br />
variations in temperature, weather, and increased pest and disease prevalence. Besides these,<br />
climate change is also hammering agriculture and food production with an increased<br />
probability <strong>of</strong> floods and drought occurrences. Floods are causing severe soil and water erosion,<br />
increased pest and disease incidences, and affect agricultural production. On the other hand,<br />
there were moderate to severe drought incidences, which affected crop sowing and agriculture<br />
production (Lokesh and Poddar, 2017). India is not different from this scenario. Various studies<br />
conducted in this regard have revealed that there would be an increased flood and drought<br />
occurrence in the country. The present study was conducted to understand the impact <strong>of</strong> farm<br />
ponds on crop yields and assess the Economic feasibility <strong>of</strong> the same. The study assumed that<br />
CRA technologies had impacted crop yield and the structures were economically viable.<br />
Methodology<br />
The study was conducted in the Wayanad District <strong>of</strong> Kerala, which was one <strong>of</strong> the most<br />
climate-affected Districts <strong>of</strong> the State (GoK, 2014). Multistage Random Sampling was used in<br />
the study to select the respondents, and the personal interview method was used to collect the<br />
information from the respondents. Ten farm pond beneficiaries in each village and a village in<br />
each block <strong>of</strong> the District were selected to make the total sample size 30. The percentage change<br />
method is used to analyze the changes in yield levels and the economic feasibility <strong>of</strong> the<br />
technologies tools like Net Present Worth (NPW), Internal Rate <strong>of</strong> Returns (IRR) and BC<br />
ratios.<br />
Net Present Value / Worth (NPV)<br />
Net present value (NPV) is the difference between the Present Value <strong>of</strong> cash inflows and the<br />
Present Value <strong>of</strong> cash outflows over time. It is mainly used to analyse the pr<strong>of</strong>itability <strong>of</strong> a new<br />
project. Project with positive NPV is worth considering, and ranking the projects based on the<br />
magnitude <strong>of</strong> NPV is also made. NPV also indicates the scale and volume <strong>of</strong> the project<br />
80 | Page Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
investments and returns. Projects with positive NPW are economically viable. It is estimated<br />
using the following equation<br />
NPV/W =<br />
P <br />
(1 + i) + P <br />
(1 + i) +. . . . . . . . . . . . . . + P <br />
(1 + i) <br />
where, P1…n = Net Cash flow in year n (Difference between cash outflows and inflows); i =<br />
Discount rate (9%); t = Time period (economic life <strong>of</strong> the Farm Pond based on respondents’<br />
opinion)<br />
Benefit – Cost Ratio (BC Ratio)<br />
It is the ratio <strong>of</strong> benefits and costs <strong>of</strong> a project expressed in monetary terms. It reflects the<br />
efficiency <strong>of</strong> the investment. BC ratio <strong>of</strong> more than one indicates the pr<strong>of</strong>itability <strong>of</strong> the project.<br />
The project is selected if the BC ratio is more than one. It is estimated using the following<br />
equation<br />
BC Ratio =<br />
∑<br />
∑<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
B <br />
(1 + i) <br />
C <br />
(1 + i) <br />
where, Bn = Benefits (Cash Inflows) received in year t; Ct = Costs (Cash Outflows) in year t ;<br />
I = rate <strong>of</strong> discount (9%); t = Time period (economic life <strong>of</strong> the Farm Pond based on<br />
respondents’ opinion); i = Discount rate<br />
Internal Rate <strong>of</strong> Return (IRR)<br />
Internal rate <strong>of</strong> return (IRR) is the discount rate at which NPV <strong>of</strong> net cash flows (NPV/W) from<br />
a project or investment equals zero, i.e. NPV/W=0. It is calculated by using the following<br />
formula.<br />
⎛<br />
⎜<br />
Lower discount Difference between<br />
IRR = + <br />
rate<br />
the two discount rates X ⎜<br />
⎜<br />
⎜<br />
⎝<br />
Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance<br />
Present worth <strong>of</strong><br />
the cash flow at<br />
the lower discount rate<br />
Absolute difference<br />
between the present<br />
worths <strong>of</strong> the cash flow<br />
at the two discount rates⎠<br />
IRR should be higher than the opportunity cost <strong>of</strong> capital for the project.<br />
Results<br />
Wayanad is a hilly District in Kerala, is dominated by homestead farming, and plantation crops<br />
are the major sources <strong>of</strong> income. The general cropping pattern <strong>of</strong> the respondents includes<br />
c<strong>of</strong>fee, pepper, rubber, banana, areca nut, ginger, turmeric and other crops. Results showed that<br />
in the post-adoption period <strong>of</strong> CRA technology, i.e. farm pond ginger (142.03%) gained the<br />
highest per cent area, it was followed by rubber (10.00%), c<strong>of</strong>fee (4.69%) and banana (4.40%).<br />
⎞<br />
⎟<br />
⎟<br />
⎟<br />
⎟<br />
81 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
In terms <strong>of</strong> productivity, arecanut has witnessed the highest productivity change, i.e. 107.56<br />
per cent, it was followed by c<strong>of</strong>fee (88.59%), pepper (56.08), cardamom (37.78) and banana<br />
(35.54%). Additional income received by the respondents was calculated using changes in farm<br />
production, multiplied by the market price. Additional income gained by the respondents was<br />
used as income flow to calculate the NPV, IRR and BC ratio. The farm ponds’ economic life<br />
was considered 25 years based on the respondents' opinion, and a nine per cent discount rate<br />
was used. On average, Rs. 4.65 lakh was invested (by both Government and Farmers) in each<br />
farm pond, and it would receive gross returns <strong>of</strong> Rs. 29.90 lakhs in its economic life.<br />
Conclusion<br />
The study concludes that implementing Climate Resilient Agriculture (CRS) technologies, viz.,<br />
farm ponds benefited the farmers at the micro level. It is equally important to note that farm<br />
ponds (CRA technology) fetched a better income than fixed investments at the banks which is<br />
indicated by higher IRR value. Thus, it is recommended that the CRA structures, viz., farm<br />
ponds and schemes like Drainage Line Treatment, can be extended further to other farmers <strong>of</strong><br />
different regions in the State and Country as it is helping in getting sustainable agriculture<br />
production.<br />
Reference<br />
GoK [Government <strong>of</strong> Kerala]. 2014. Kerala State Action Plan on Climate Change (Online).<br />
Department <strong>of</strong> Environment and Climate Change, Government <strong>of</strong> Kerala. Available:<br />
https://envt.kerala.gov.in/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/Kerala-State-Action-Plan-on-<br />
Climate-Change-KSAPCC-2014-August.pdf. [27 th Oct. 2022]<br />
Lokesh, S. and Poddar, R.S. 2017. Impact <strong>of</strong> drought on water resources and agriculture in<br />
Karnataka. International J. Pure and Applied Biosci., 6 (2): 1102-1107.<br />
T1-29P-1322<br />
Optimum Sowing Window and Water Stress at Critical Stages on the Growth and<br />
Yield <strong>of</strong> Groundnut Crop- A Modeling Approach<br />
A.V. M. Subba Rao, Deepti Verma, V. P. Pramod, S. K. Bal and A. Suryachandra Rao 2<br />
1 All India Coordinated Research Project on Agrometeorology,<br />
ICAR-Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, Hyderabad, Telangana 500 009, India<br />
2 Indian Institute <strong>of</strong> Tropical Meteorology, Pune<br />
For optimization <strong>of</strong> crop yield, sowing at a suitable time to fit the crop growth period is critical.<br />
If the optimal planting window is determined, then the farmers can utilize the planting<br />
opportunity that occurs in that optimal planting window (Sulochana et al., 2002). Groundnut is<br />
one <strong>of</strong> the important oilseed crops having exceeding demand for its oil. The water requirement<br />
82 | Page Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
<strong>of</strong> the crop is an important phenomenon to estimate the crop yield and understand the crop<br />
water necessity at different crop phenological stages as water deficits cause yield reduction.<br />
Crop growth simulation models are used for the optimization <strong>of</strong> sowing window and crop water<br />
stress during different stages <strong>of</strong> a crop during the season. In groundnut, flowering, pegging,<br />
and pod formation stages are the important growth stages where water availability is much<br />
needed for a better crop. Rainfall is one <strong>of</strong> the major weather parameters playing a crucial role<br />
in groundnut crop growth and yield. Simulation models help to simulate the crop water stress<br />
<strong>of</strong> different crops. There is a thresh hold <strong>of</strong> above a specific value (50%) that impacts crop<br />
growth and development process. On the other hand, the water requirement <strong>of</strong> groundnut varies<br />
with the stages and is lowest from germination to flower formation and reaches a maximum<br />
during pod formation. During these stages, if stress persists, the performance <strong>of</strong> the crop goes<br />
into trouble. In view <strong>of</strong> the above, a study has been conducted using the DSSAT model to<br />
simulate, identify and quantify the water stress at different crop stages <strong>of</strong> the Kharif sown<br />
groundnut crop.<br />
Methodology<br />
Experimental groundnut crop and weather<br />
data were collected from AICRPAM<br />
Anantapuramu center on Groundnut<br />
growth parameters and yields from the<br />
years 2009-2019. Calibrated and validated<br />
DSSAT Peanut model for K-6 variety used<br />
for simulating groundnut crop for different<br />
planting dates (15-June, 22-June, 30-June,<br />
7 July, 21 July, 28 July, 04 August, 11<br />
August and 15 August) and yields during kharif period. Simulations <strong>of</strong> pod yield and other<br />
yield attributes using the calibrated model were found to be quite accurate. The simulated<br />
output files further processed to extract the crop water stress.<br />
Results<br />
The optimum sowing window for Kharif groundnut in the Anantapur region is mid-June to mid<br />
<strong>of</strong> July and can continue up to 31 July, after that it is late sowing and will get a low yield after<br />
sowing 31 July. The CROPGRO model has been calibrated and validated for rainfed groundnut<br />
for the years 2019 and 2020 at the Anantapur agricultural station. In the package <strong>of</strong> practices<br />
for high yields <strong>of</strong> groundnut (K-6) in the Anantapur region planting in mid-June–15-July is<br />
recommended. The patterns <strong>of</strong> variation <strong>of</strong> the simulated yield with planting date, for the 11<br />
years (2009-2019) are shown in the figure.<br />
Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance<br />
83 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Results showed that variation in the simulated yield obtained is affected by different sowing<br />
dates. The highest yield was obtained in<br />
crop sown during the first fortnight <strong>of</strong><br />
July. It may be due to no moisture stress<br />
coinciding with the critical stage <strong>of</strong> crops<br />
in crop sowing in this period. The critical<br />
stages identified are the vegetative stage,<br />
the flowering stage, the peg development<br />
and pod formation stage, and the pod<br />
filling stage (Nageswara Rao et al., 1985,<br />
1989). The crop sown in June has not<br />
received excess rainfall during the stage <strong>of</strong> vegetative growth and the initial dry spell after<br />
sowing helped in pr<strong>of</strong>use flowering and synchronized peg formation may cause in reducing<br />
yield.<br />
The crop sown from 7 July-22 July is identified as the optimum sowing date which can give<br />
maximum yield because the crop sown during this period received rains during the vegetative<br />
stage after sowing and not allowing the crop to undergo initial moisture stress which is good<br />
for groundnut for synchronize and produce flowering. Crop sown on normal sowing date gives<br />
maximum yield because there is less water stress found during critical stages <strong>of</strong> Kharif<br />
groundnut. The figure showed that the sowing date (15 June, 22 June, 30 June, 07 July, 15 July,<br />
22 July, 28 July, 04 August, and 15 August) is simulated using the DSSAT crop simulation<br />
model to estimate the crop water stress at different crop phenological stages. Maximum water<br />
stress was found in early sown June and late August sown crops in comparison to normal<br />
sowing time (7-Jul, 15 July, and 22 July), which coincides with critical stages <strong>of</strong> groundnut. In<br />
June sown crop, maximum water stress was found in the first flower to first seed stage i.e.,<br />
(>0.5) (50 %) and in the August sown crop maximum water stress was found > 0.5 (50%) in<br />
the first seed stage to physiological maturity. These stages are crucial for yield determination.<br />
Conclusion<br />
A crop sowing window is an important factor to understand the impact <strong>of</strong> crop growth and<br />
development. Rainfall plays a vital role for Kharif crops to supply water to the crops and soil<br />
moisture. For early sowing dates <strong>of</strong> June (15, 22, 30) and August (4, 11 15), late sowing <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Kharif groundnut crop shows high crop water stress during critical stages over the 2009-2019<br />
year.<br />
References<br />
Nageswara Rao, R. G., Singh, S., Sivakumar, M. V. K., 1985. Effect <strong>of</strong> water deficit at different<br />
growth phases <strong>of</strong> peanut I. yield responses. J. Agron. 77, 782–786.<br />
84 | Page Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Nageswara Rao, R. C., Williams, J. H., Sivakumar, M. V. K., Wadia, K. D. R., 1989. Effect <strong>of</strong><br />
water deficit at different growth phases <strong>of</strong> peanut II. Responses to drought during<br />
preflowering phase. J. Agron. 80, 431–438.<br />
Sulochana Gadgil, Seshagiri Rao, P. R., Narahari Rao, K. 2002. Agric Syst. 74, 431–457<br />
T1-30P-1327<br />
Effect <strong>of</strong> Super Absorbent Polymers (Hydrogel), Bioagent (Trichoderma)<br />
and Organic Manures in Water Management <strong>of</strong> Rainfed Wheat<br />
(Triticum aestivum) in Eastern Uttar Pradesh<br />
Sayoni Das 1 , Ombir Singh 1 , Sandeep Kumar 1 , Avijit Sen 2<br />
1<br />
CCR PG College, Muzaffarnagar, UP<br />
2 Institute <strong>of</strong> Agricultural Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh<br />
The greatest challenge to Indian agriculture in the twenty-first century appears to be water<br />
scarcity. According to estimates from the Central Water Commission, more than 54% <strong>of</strong> the<br />
nation is at risk <strong>of</strong> drought. India has 4% <strong>of</strong> the world's freshwater resources, with the<br />
agricultural sector using more than 85% <strong>of</strong> it. Water availability per person is steadily<br />
declining, which highlights the necessity <strong>of</strong> improving water use efficiency in agriculture. The<br />
usage <strong>of</strong> Super Absorbent Polymers (SAPs) has recently attracted a lot <strong>of</strong> interest for<br />
agricultural water management. These polymers have the ability to swell 350–500 times <strong>of</strong><br />
their own weight in deionized water, and they have the capacity to produce more with less<br />
water. Additionally, bioagents (Trichoderma), organic manures (FYM and compost) have the<br />
ability to release <strong>of</strong> nutrients from soil or increase organic matter content, thus improving water<br />
retention capacity and maintaining the health <strong>of</strong> the soil.<br />
Methodology<br />
The field experiment was conducted under Varanasi condition <strong>of</strong> eastern Uttar Pradesh during<br />
the rabi (winter) season <strong>of</strong> 2016-2017 at the Agricultural Research Farm, Institute <strong>of</strong><br />
Agricultural Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh (India). The soil <strong>of</strong><br />
the experimental field was sandy clay loam in texture with 0.35 % organic carbon. The<br />
experiment was laid out in randomized block design with 4 replications. HUW -510 variety <strong>of</strong><br />
wheat was selected for the experiment. The experiment comprised <strong>of</strong> 7 treatments <strong>of</strong> different<br />
combinations <strong>of</strong> hydrogel, Trichoderma, FYM, D18 Compost and recommended doses <strong>of</strong><br />
NPK.<br />
Results<br />
The maximum number <strong>of</strong> ear heads/running m was obtained with combined application <strong>of</strong> NPK<br />
+ FYM, which remained at par with FYM + Hydrogel + NPK and D 18 Compost + NPK, while<br />
Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance<br />
85 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
the lowest number <strong>of</strong> ear heads was found in combined application <strong>of</strong> D18 compost +<br />
Trichoderma + NPK. Again, that maximum number <strong>of</strong> grains/ear head was recorded with<br />
combined application <strong>of</strong> NPK + FYM, but remained at par with all other treatment except D 18<br />
compost + Trichoderma + NPK and NPK. Different treatments registered non- significant<br />
effects on test weight <strong>of</strong> rainfed wheat. The highest grain yield (19.33 q/ha) was obtained with<br />
combined application <strong>of</strong> NPK and FYM and remained significantly superior to D18 compost<br />
+Trichoderma + NPK and NPK. The highest straw yield (36.89 q/ha) was obtained in<br />
combined application <strong>of</strong> NPK + FYM, but it remained at par with D 18 Compost + NPK and D 18<br />
Compost + hydrogel + NPK. Even though no significant difference was observed in the harvest<br />
index due to different treatments, FYM +Hydrogel + NPK registered the highest harvest index.<br />
Treatment<br />
Number <strong>of</strong><br />
ear head/<br />
running m<br />
No. <strong>of</strong><br />
grains/<br />
ear head<br />
Test<br />
weight<br />
(g)<br />
Grain<br />
yield<br />
(q/ha)<br />
Straw<br />
yield<br />
(q/ha)<br />
Harvest<br />
index<br />
(%)<br />
FYM+NPK 55.75 36.20 33.31 19.33 36.89 34.31<br />
FYM+Trichoderma<br />
+NPK<br />
45.25 33.13 33.18 15.79 29.64 34.67<br />
FYM+Hydrogel+ NPK 53.50 35.48 33.30 16.64 28.58 37.03<br />
D 18 Compost+ NPK 48.50 34.60 33.25 16.44 30.26 35.17<br />
D 18Compost+<br />
Trichoderma+ NPK<br />
D 18Compost+<br />
Hydrogel+ NPK<br />
41.25 31.08 33.15 13.76 27.86 32.98<br />
47.25 33.75 33.21 16.37 32.33 33.29<br />
NPK 44.25 31.30 33.16 14.8 29.09 33.94<br />
SEm± 3.69 1.90 0.27 2.11 3.21 3.51<br />
CD (P=0.05) 7.77 3.99 NS 4.45 6.75 NS<br />
Conclusion<br />
Since combined application FYM and NPK was found to be more effective, it can be accepted<br />
to be more logical for adaption for water conservation in rainfed wheat. Being organic in nature,<br />
it promotes environmental sustainability also.<br />
Ratooning Sorghum for Agronomic Rainwater Management<br />
T1-31P-1334<br />
V. Maruthi, K.S. Reddy, V.K. Singh, P.K. Pankaj, K. Srinivas, B. Sanjeeva Reddy,<br />
A.G.K. Reddy, Ashish S. Dhimate, V. Visha Kumari and M. Mounika<br />
ICAR-Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, Hyderabad-59, Telangana State, India<br />
Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench) is mainly grown as a dual-purpose rainfed crop.<br />
During times <strong>of</strong> fodder scarcity, sorghum stover is <strong>of</strong> great consolation. However, eroded<br />
86 | Page Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
marginal soils produce a poor crop <strong>of</strong> sorghum, coupled with low market prices resulting in<br />
poor pr<strong>of</strong>its, thus, favored least by the farmers (Zalkuwi et al. 2015). Sorghum ratooning is one<br />
<strong>of</strong> the drought management practices tried earlier in rainfed areas, which could also be<br />
introduced and evaluated matching with the rainfall forecast. Not only does there seem to be a<br />
shift in rainfall distribution, but there may also be chances <strong>of</strong> receiving extra rain events beyond<br />
South West monsoon (SWM) season through the probability estimation. Horsegram<br />
(Macrotyloma uniflorum (Lam.) Verdc) is a contingent pulse crop grown mostly during late<br />
kharif/ early rabi for grain and fodder purposes as well.<br />
Methodology<br />
With the extra rain events beyond South West monsoon, chance cropping <strong>of</strong> a pulse horse gram<br />
(HG) can be considered for sowing in the harvested strips/rows <strong>of</strong> strip row Sorghum and<br />
pigeonpea intercropping as a sequence crop, and the harvested sorghum crop was<br />
ratooned. This practice was carried out mainly during October- November months when we<br />
receive rain. However ratooning sorghum does not need seeding while horse gram did so. The<br />
recommended dose <strong>of</strong> nitrogen was applied to the sorghum ratoon and recommended amount<br />
<strong>of</strong> nitrogen and phosphorus was to the horse gram crop. The first set <strong>of</strong> sorghum ratooned and<br />
horse gram were sole crops while the second set was carried out in a 4:4 strip row intercropping<br />
system <strong>of</strong> sorghum and pigeonpea. Rainfall received was 299 mm and 63 mm respectively<br />
during both types <strong>of</strong> years for post-monsoon.<br />
Results<br />
Ratoon sorghum performed better during well-distributed rainfall while deficit rainfall affected<br />
its performance. Compared to the performance <strong>of</strong> sequence horse gram sown after the harvest<br />
<strong>of</strong> sorghum crop, horse gram needs sowing rains, seed, seedbed preparation, and sowing costs.<br />
This needs to be followed by the receipt <strong>of</strong> good post-rainy season rain events for a successful<br />
horse gram crop.<br />
Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance<br />
87 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Performance <strong>of</strong> ratoon sorghum as compared to the sequence horse gram for capitalizing in on post<br />
monsoon rains<br />
Conclusion<br />
Ratoon sorghum could be one alternate option if we are unable to sow sequence horse gram<br />
due to the non-receipt <strong>of</strong> post-monsoon rains timely. Further ratoon sorghum requires only the<br />
application <strong>of</strong> nitrogenous fertilizers either as a foliar spray or as a placement in soil. Cutting<br />
heights and low management need to be standardized. Further in place <strong>of</strong> ratoonability, if<br />
tillering is promoted in sorghum might be a great help for fodder production as the fodder<br />
demand is rising.<br />
References<br />
Zalkuwi, J. and Singh, R. and Bhattarai, M. and Singh, O.P. and Rao, D. 2015. Analysis <strong>of</strong><br />
constraints influencing sorghum farmers using Garrett’s ranking technique; A<br />
Comparative study <strong>of</strong> India and Nigeria. Int. J.Scientific Res. Manage., 3(3): 2435-2440.<br />
T1-32P-1335<br />
Performance <strong>of</strong> Groundnut Under Micro Irrigation Methods, Schedules<br />
and Varied Fertilizer Doses<br />
K. Sathish Babu and Y. Padmalatha<br />
Agricultural Research Station, Garikapadu– 521175<br />
Acharya N.G. Ranga Agricultural University, Guntur, Andhra Pradesh, India<br />
Among nine oilseed crops grown in India, groundnut occupies premier position with 18.8 %<br />
and 20.7 % <strong>of</strong> total oilseeds area and production, respectively. Water and fertilizers are the<br />
most important management factors by which farmers can control the plant growth and yield,<br />
88 | Page Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
which helps to achieve sustained crop production. Thus, the use <strong>of</strong> micro irrigation system<br />
comprises drip and micro sprinkler system <strong>of</strong>fers a great degree <strong>of</strong> control over water and<br />
fertilizer application to meet the requirement <strong>of</strong> crops. Irrigation scheduling by these systems<br />
are usually based on water requirement <strong>of</strong> crop to maintain favourable soil water content in the<br />
root zone, that helps to achieve sustained growth and yield gains up to 100 per cent, water<br />
savings upto 40 to 80 per cent, and associated fertilizer, pesticide and labour savings over<br />
conventional irrigation systems. In recent years the water released from NSP left canal is<br />
reduced. Added to this, low groundwater recharges in the wells situated in the vicinity <strong>of</strong> NSP<br />
left canal command area warrants for growing <strong>of</strong> ID crops only. In view <strong>of</strong> the above, an<br />
investigation was undertaken to assess performance <strong>of</strong> groundnut under drip and micro<br />
sprinkler system with various doses <strong>of</strong> fertilizers comparison to the conventional system.<br />
Methodology<br />
A field experiment was conducted for two consecutive years during rabi 2018-19 and rabi<br />
2019-20 at Agricultural Research Station, Garikapadu, Krishna district, ANGRAU with the<br />
objective to identify the suitable micro irrigation method, schedule and fertilizer dose for rabi<br />
groundnut crop. The treatments consist <strong>of</strong> three methods <strong>of</strong> irrigation as main plots i.e.,<br />
sprinkler, drip irrigation and check basin methods with four fertilizer doses as subplots i.e., 100<br />
%, 75 %, 50 % RDF and soil test-based fertilizer application and three irrigation schedules i.e.,<br />
IW/CPE ratio <strong>of</strong> 1.0, 0.8 and 0.6 as sub-sub plots. The experiment was laid out in a split-split<br />
plot design and replicated thrice. Groundnut variety Kadiri 6 Irrigation schedules were given<br />
based on the pan evaporimeter readings located in ARS, Garikapadu premises and imposed the<br />
treatments with 10 mm irrigation from 30 DAS to 60 DAS and 15 mm irrigation from 61 DAS<br />
to maturity in drip method, 30 mm irrigation from 30 DAS to maturity in mini sprinkler method<br />
and 50 mm depth irrigation from 30 DAS to maturity in check basin method. Biometrical<br />
observations at harvest, yield attributes and field water use efficiency recorded as per defined<br />
procedures.<br />
Results<br />
The results (pooled for 2018-19 and 2019-20) were recorded on number <strong>of</strong> pods plant -1 ,<br />
hundred kernel weight (g), pod yield (kg ha -1 ) and field water use efficiency (kg ha -1 mm -1 ) are<br />
presented in Table 1. The number <strong>of</strong> pods plant -1 was significantly varied by irrigation<br />
schedules as well as interaction between methods <strong>of</strong> irrigation and fertilizer doses. Among<br />
irrigation schedules, IW/CPE ratios <strong>of</strong> 1.0 and 0.8 were comparable and significantly superior<br />
to IW/CPE ratio <strong>of</strong> 0.6. They were significantly lowest at IW/CPE ratio <strong>of</strong> 0.6 at all fertilizer<br />
doses. Irrigation methods and interactions between irrigation methods and fertilizer doses and<br />
interaction between all treatmental combinations have significantly influenced the pod yield <strong>of</strong><br />
groundnut. Among methods <strong>of</strong> irrigation, significantly highest pod yield was with drip method<br />
<strong>of</strong> irrigation (2079 kg ha -1 ). While, rainport mini sprinkler irrigation and check basin method<br />
Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance<br />
89 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
have recorded significantly comparable pod yields. Drip irrigation at 75% RDF (2206 kg ha -1 )<br />
and STBF (2119 kg ha -1 ) were comparable and recorded significantly highest pod yield. A<br />
combination <strong>of</strong> drip irrigation at IW/CPE ratio <strong>of</strong> 1.0 with STBF and drip irrigation at IW/CPE<br />
ratio <strong>of</strong> 0.6 with 75% RDF were at par with each other and recorded significantly highest pod<br />
yield. Apart from one pre-sowing irrigation (50 mm) and rainfall (25.0 mm), till maturity, 250,<br />
200 and 150 mm under check basin method; 220, 205 and 165 mm under drip method; 270,<br />
240 and 180 mm depth <strong>of</strong> irrigation under rainport mini sprinklers for irrigation schedules <strong>of</strong><br />
IW/CPE ratios 1.0, 0.75 and 0.5 respectively were given. Higher field water use efficiency was<br />
recorded with drip irrigation at IW/CPE 0.6 (8.6 kg ha -1 mm -1 ). Lowest field water use<br />
efficiency (5.2 kg ha -1 mm -1 ) was recorded with check basin method at IW/CPE 1.0. The higher<br />
water use efficienty noticed under drip irrigated treatment mainly owed to higher economic<br />
yield per unit, amount <strong>of</strong> water consumed by the crop (Mathukia et al., 2019).<br />
Conclusion<br />
Based on the two year experimentation results it was concluded that, groundnut can be<br />
cultivated during rabi season with significantly higher yield attributes and pod yield recorded<br />
significantly higher field water use efficiency was recorded with drip irrigation at IW/CPE 0.6<br />
(8.6 kg ha -1 mm -1 ), which is suitable for Krishna district <strong>of</strong> Andhra Pradesh.<br />
References<br />
Mathukia RK, Chhodavadia SK, Sagarka BK and Bhalu VB. 2019. Summer groundnut<br />
response to micro-irrigation and transient water stress. Research & Reviews: Journal<br />
<strong>of</strong> Crop Science and Technology, 8: 16-20.<br />
Effect <strong>of</strong> irrigation and fertilizer doses on yield attributes and pod yield <strong>of</strong><br />
Methods <strong>of</strong> irrigation (A)<br />
groundnut during rabi (Pooled data <strong>of</strong> 2018-19 & 2019-20)<br />
No. <strong>of</strong><br />
pods/plant<br />
100-kernel<br />
weight (g)<br />
Pod yield (kg<br />
ha -1 )<br />
Field water<br />
use efficiency<br />
(kg ha -1 mm -1 )<br />
Sprinkler irrigation 10.9 41.3 1814 6.7<br />
Drip irrigation 11.0 45.1 2079 8.6<br />
Check basin method 10.2 39.8 1769 5.2<br />
SE (m) 0.40 1.25 47.9 0.52<br />
CD (p=0.05%) 1.18 2.49 149 1.02<br />
Irrigation schedules (B)<br />
1.0 IW/CPE 11.1 40.4 1944 5.5<br />
0.8 IW/CPE 10.9 41.8 1927 7.2<br />
0.6 IW/CPE 9.9 39.7 1792 7.3<br />
SE (m) 0.52 1.20 42.9 0.42<br />
90 | Page Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
CD (p=0.05%) 1.08 2.38 152 1.24<br />
Fertilizer doses (C)<br />
100 % RDF 10.6 41.2 1891 5.8<br />
75 % RDF 10.8 40.3 2206 7.3<br />
50 % RDF 10.0 39.5 1863 7.2<br />
Soil test based fertilizer (STBF) 11.0 42.3 2119 7.4<br />
SE (m) 0.64 1.65 48.9 0.69<br />
CD (p=0.05%) 1.02 2.58 142 1.18<br />
Interactions<br />
AXB<br />
SE (m) 0.02 0.01 127 2.25<br />
CD (p=0.05%) NS NS NS NS<br />
BXC<br />
SE (m) 1.2 0.04 119 2.56<br />
CD (p=0.05%) NS NS NS NS<br />
AXBXC<br />
SE (m) 0.08 0.02 42.5 2.18<br />
CD (p=0.05%) NS NS 235 NS<br />
T1-33P-1357<br />
Water Harvesting Technologies for Enhancing Productivity <strong>of</strong> Rainfed<br />
Agriculture Contribute to Resilience<br />
K.V. Rao, B.V.S. Kiran*, J. V. N. S. Prasad, S. Kundu, Manoranjan Kumar,<br />
T. V. Prasad, K. Sammi Reddy and V. K. Singh<br />
ICAR-Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, Hyderabad, Telangana, India<br />
* sagalkiran94@gmail.com.<br />
Rainfed agro-ecosystems occupy a significant place in Indian agriculture which is a source <strong>of</strong><br />
millions <strong>of</strong> small holders. Out <strong>of</strong> 141 million ha <strong>of</strong> net sown area in the country, 80 million ha<br />
area is rainfed and will remain same for a foreseeable future (Srinivasarao et al., 2013). The<br />
impact <strong>of</strong> climate change and variability in the country on agricultural production is evident in<br />
the recent years. Rainfall and its distribution vary widely among the various agro ecosystems<br />
impacting the yields <strong>of</strong> crops. Droughts, floods, delayed onset <strong>of</strong> monsoons and prolonged dry<br />
spells are the major climatic vulnerabilities resulting the severe yield loss and affecting the<br />
sustainable livelihoods. Conservation <strong>of</strong> rainwater and its recycling is important for sustainable<br />
crop production in rainfed condition. The rainwater can be conserved either by in-situ or exsitu<br />
in natural or manmade structure for supplemental irrigation. Soil conservation is an<br />
important way to protect the productive lands.<br />
Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance<br />
91 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Methodology<br />
Participatory on-farm demonstrations were conducted on farmers’ fields during 2011-2021<br />
under the project “National Innovations in Climate Resilient Agriculture” (NICRA) which is<br />
operational at 151 village clusters. Villages were selected based on the risk proneness and it<br />
represents the overall climatic constraint <strong>of</strong> the district. During 2019, about 68 KVKs involved<br />
in TDC program have received the normal rainfall between 19 to -19 per cent than long period<br />
average (LPA), 26 KVKs received the deficit rainfall <strong>of</strong> -20 to -59 per cent, 20 KVKs received<br />
the excess rainfall between 20 to 60 per cent and 7 KVKs received large excess rainfall between<br />
65 to 102 per cent more than the normal kharif rainfall. The climate resilient techniques viz.,<br />
in-situ moisture conservation through conservation furrow, ridge and furrow, broad bed furrow,<br />
trench cum bunding and mulching were demonstrated at farmers’ field.<br />
Results<br />
The effect <strong>of</strong> water harvesting technologies on various crops are presented in Table 1. Data<br />
indicated that, check dams, farm ponds, percolation tanks, bore well recharge technologies in<br />
crops such as rice, maize, soybean, pigeonpea, cotton and wheat has increased the irrigated<br />
area and cropping intensification. By providing supplemental irrigation to kharif crops and pre<br />
sowing irrigation to rabi crops the yields were enhanced upto 112% and also augmented the<br />
ground water level increasing the water table upto 15-100% in various locations. In Hilly<br />
regions Jalkund was demonstrated to farmers to harvest the run<strong>of</strong>f and provide lifesaving<br />
irrigation to high value crops and increased crop diversification. The yield improvement<br />
obtained was more than 100% compared to farmers without jalkunds. In-situ approaches were<br />
also demonstrated at various locations, in low rainfall regions (
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
impounding water on the surface <strong>of</strong> the soil to increase the opportunity time for infiltration. In<br />
present study, it was observed that adoption <strong>of</strong> water harvesting technologies during deficient<br />
rainfall conditions benefitted by getting additional yield improvement <strong>of</strong> > 100% compared to<br />
farmers’ practice.<br />
References<br />
Singh, D. V., Vyas, A. K., Gupta, G. K., Ramteke, R. and Khan, I.R. 2011. Tractor drawn broad<br />
bed furrow seed drill machine to overcome moisture stress for soybean in Vertisols.<br />
Indian J. Agric. Sci. 81: 941-944.<br />
Srinivasa Rao Ch., Ravindra Chary G., Mishra, P K, Nagarjuna Kumar, R., Maruthi Sankar, G<br />
R, Venkateswarlu, B. and Sikka, A. K. 2013. Real time contingency Planning: Initial<br />
experiences from AICRPDA. AICRPDA, CRIDA, Hyderabad.<br />
Chary, R. G., Prasad, J. V. N. S., Osman, M., Ramana, D. B. V., Nagasree, K., Rejani, R.,<br />
Subbarao, A. V. M., Srinivas, I., Rama Rao, C. A., Prabhakar, M., Bhaskar, S., Singh, A.<br />
K. & Alagusundaram, K. (Editors). (2019). Technology Demonstrations: Enabling<br />
communities to cope with climate variability and to enhance adaptive capacity and<br />
resilience. National Innovations in Climate Resilient Agriculture (NICRA) Project,<br />
ICAR-Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, Hyderabad, Research<br />
Highlights, p121.<br />
Impact <strong>of</strong> water harvesting measures on yield improvement and ground water increase<br />
Intervention Crop % yield<br />
improvement<br />
Check dams<br />
Percolation tank<br />
Bore well recharge<br />
technology<br />
Farm pond<br />
Jalkunds<br />
Blackgram, sesamum,<br />
pearlnmillet, wheat<br />
Rice, maize, pigeonpea,<br />
sorghum<br />
Soybean, pigeonpea,<br />
cotton<br />
Tomato, soybean, cotton,<br />
groundnut, greengram<br />
Rice, maize, cabbage,<br />
cauliflower, tomato,<br />
capsicum, broccoli<br />
% ground water<br />
increase<br />
56-112 25-30<br />
20-32 15-24<br />
25-29 36<br />
21-80 100<br />
60-250 -<br />
Compartmental bunding Sorghum 94 -<br />
Trench cum bunding<br />
Groundnut, pigeonpea,<br />
maize, mango<br />
Upto 56 -<br />
Ridges and furrow Cowpea and Radish 17-32 -<br />
Land level and bunding Chickpea 18 -<br />
Conservation furrow Soybean 35 -<br />
Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance<br />
93 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Opening furrow after 30<br />
DAS<br />
Mulching with<br />
sugarcane trash<br />
Cotton 61 -<br />
Maize 45 -<br />
Contour bunding Chickpea 17 -<br />
Broad bed furrow Pigeonpea 25 -<br />
Broad bed furrow Soybean 58 -<br />
T1-34P-1358<br />
Performance Evaluation <strong>of</strong> Standard Performance Indicators <strong>of</strong> Telugu<br />
Ganga Project in Andhra Pradesh<br />
Ch. Murali Krishna * , M.V. Ramana, B. Ramana Murthy, N.V. Sarala and<br />
H.V. Hema Kumar<br />
Agricultural Research Station, Acharya NG Ranga Agricultural University, Anantapur, Andhra<br />
Pradesh,<br />
Sri Venkateswara Agricultural College, Tirupati,<br />
Agricultural Research Station, Perumallapalli, Tirupati, Andhra Pradesh.<br />
* muraliagengg@gmail.com<br />
Among different agricultural problems, water scarcity has been a growing global problem that<br />
is challenging sustainable development placing a few constraints on the production <strong>of</strong> enough<br />
food to meet the increasing food requirements. The population in India which is over a 1.2<br />
billion at present is projected to significantly increase to 1.4 billion by 2025. The National<br />
Water Policy envisaged that food grain production should increase to 350 million tons by 2025.<br />
Telugu Ganga Project (TGP) irrigation system is one <strong>of</strong> the major irrigation projects in south<br />
India. The irrigation system consists <strong>of</strong> an anicut on Krishna river starting at Srisailam, Kurnool<br />
district in Andhra Pradesh. The four commands were located in Chittoor, Nellore, Kurnool and<br />
Kadapa districts in Andhra Pradesh state (Narasimha et al., 2017). A study was conducted to<br />
assess the performance <strong>of</strong> four commands <strong>of</strong> Telugu Ganga Project in Andhra Pradesh using<br />
standard performance indicators viz., Equity, Uniformity, Irrigation intensity, Overall<br />
consumed ratio/efficiency, Adequacy, Yield (kg/ha), Yield (kg/m 3 ), Yield (kg/m 3 ) <strong>of</strong> Eto and<br />
Crop yield ratio. The values <strong>of</strong> performance indicators were derived for each command during<br />
2013 to 2019.<br />
94 | Page Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Yield (kg/ha)<br />
6000<br />
5500<br />
5000<br />
4500<br />
4000<br />
3500<br />
3000<br />
2500<br />
2000<br />
1500<br />
1000<br />
500<br />
0<br />
Chittoor Nellore Kurnool YSR Kadapa<br />
5552<br />
5214<br />
4459<br />
3914<br />
Chittoor Nellore Kurnool YSR Kadapa<br />
Methodology<br />
Indicator values <strong>of</strong> yield attained in different districts in TGP command during 2013 to 2019<br />
Ranking <strong>of</strong> different parameters in four districts<br />
Ranks were assigned to different parameters for their mean values over years for assessing their<br />
superiority in different districts. The rank sums <strong>of</strong> parameters are given in Table. The rank<br />
sums were separately derived for 2 categories <strong>of</strong> parameters, viz., RS1 and RS2. RS1 comprised<br />
<strong>of</strong> (i) Equity, (ii) Uniformity, (iii) Irrigation, (iv) Overall consumed ratio/Efficiency, (v)<br />
Adequacy, (vi) Yield and (vii) Crop yield ratio. RS2 comprised <strong>of</strong> (i) Gross area, (ii) Volume<br />
<strong>of</strong> water, (iii) Command area, (iv) Total Volume <strong>of</strong> water, (v) Water demand, (vi) Rf, (vii) Dp,<br />
(viii) Area and (ix) Research station yield (Bos et al.,1994). Rank sums <strong>of</strong> RS1 indicated that<br />
Nellore was superior with minimum rank sum <strong>of</strong> 14, followed by Kurnool with rank sum <strong>of</strong><br />
17, Kadapa with rank sum <strong>of</strong> 28, while Chittoor attained maximum rank sum <strong>of</strong> 31. Rank sums<br />
<strong>of</strong> RS2 indicated that Chittoor was superior with minimum rank sum <strong>of</strong> 14, followed by Nellore<br />
with rank sum <strong>of</strong> 16, Kurnool with rank sum <strong>of</strong> 19 and Kadapa with maximum rank sum <strong>of</strong> 20.<br />
The over-all rank sum indicated that Nellore was superior with minimum rank sum <strong>of</strong> 30,<br />
followed by Kurnool with rank sum <strong>of</strong> 36, Chittoor with rank sum <strong>of</strong> 45 and Kadapa with rank<br />
sum <strong>of</strong> 48 in the TGP command.<br />
Ranking <strong>of</strong> performance indicators in different districts under the TGP command<br />
Parameter Nellore Kurnool Chittoor Kadapa<br />
Equity (%) 3 4 2 1<br />
Uniformity (%) 3 4 2 1<br />
Irrigation intensity (%) 2 1 3 4<br />
Over-all consumed ratio/Efficiency (%) 2 1 3 3<br />
Adequacy (%) 3 2 1 4<br />
Yield (kg/ha) 1 3 2 4<br />
Crop yield ratio 2 4 1 3<br />
Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance<br />
95 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Gross area (acres) 1 3 4 2<br />
Volume <strong>of</strong> water (Mcum) 2 1 4 3<br />
Command area (acres) 1 2 4 3<br />
Total Volume <strong>of</strong> water (Mcum) 2 1 4 3<br />
Water demand (Mcum) 2 1 3 4<br />
Rf (Cum) 2 3 1 4<br />
Dp (Cum) 2 1 4 3<br />
Area (ha) 1 3 4 2<br />
Research station yield (kg/ha) 1 2 3 4<br />
RS1 14 17 31 28<br />
RS2 16 19 14 20<br />
Over-all rank sum 30 36 45 48<br />
Results<br />
Based on the study, we have assessed the superiority <strong>of</strong> performance <strong>of</strong> four commands <strong>of</strong><br />
Telugu Ganga Project in Chittoor, Nellore, Kurnool and Kadapa districts in Andhra Pradesh<br />
using standard performance indicators like Equity, Uniformity, Irrigation intensity, Overall<br />
consumed ratio/efficiency, Adequacy, Yield (kg/ha), Yield (kg/m 3 ), Yield (kg/m 3 ) <strong>of</strong> Eto and<br />
Crop yield ratio observed during 2013 to 2019. The indicators were assessed in two groups<br />
viz., RS1 and RS2 where RS1 comprised <strong>of</strong> (i) Equity, (ii) Uniformity, (iii) Irrigation, (iv)<br />
Over-all consumed ratio/Efficiency, (v) Adequacy, (vi) Yield and (vii) Crop yield ratio, while<br />
RS2 comprised <strong>of</strong> (i) Gross area, (ii) Volume <strong>of</strong> water, (iii) Command area, (iv) Total Volume<br />
<strong>of</strong> water, (v) Water demand, (vi) Rf, (vii) Dp, (viii) Area and (ix) Research station yield. Based<br />
on RS1 group <strong>of</strong> indicators, Nellore was superior with best performance for all indicators<br />
having lowest rank sum <strong>of</strong> 14. Kurnool command was the 2 nd best with rank sum <strong>of</strong> 17, while<br />
Kadapa and Chittoor had a rank sum <strong>of</strong> 28 and 31 respectively. Based on RS2 group, Chittoor<br />
was superior for all indicators with minimum rank sum <strong>of</strong> 14, followed by Nellore with 16,<br />
Kurnool with 19 and Kadapa with rank sum <strong>of</strong> 20. When we considered both groups, Nellore<br />
was superior with minimum rank sum <strong>of</strong> 30, followed by Kurnool, Chittoor and Kadapa with<br />
rank sum <strong>of</strong> 36, 45 and 48 respectively in the TGP command.<br />
References<br />
Bos, M.G., Murray, R.D.H., Merry, D., Jonson, H.G. and Snellers, W.B. 1994. Methodologies<br />
for assessing performance <strong>of</strong> irrigation and drainage management. Irrig. Drain. Syst.,<br />
7: 231-261.<br />
Narasimha, K., Girija, P., Ravi, S., and Suresh, M. 2017. Evaluate the cropping pattern in the<br />
command areas using satellite Remote sensing techniques <strong>of</strong> Godavari basin major<br />
irrigation projects. Int. J. Adv. Res. Publ., 5(7):1719-1725.<br />
96 | Page Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
T1-35 P-1384<br />
Catchment–Storage-Command Relationship for Increasing Water<br />
Productivity in Micro-Watershed <strong>of</strong> Raichur District<br />
R. H. Rajkumar* 1 , M.R. Umesh 1 , S.N. Bhatt 1 , M.S. Shirahatti 2 and G. Ravindra Chary 3<br />
1 AICRP on Dryland Agriculture, MARS, UAS, Raichur, Karnataka<br />
2 AICRP on Dryland Agriculture, RRS, Vijayapura, UASD, Karnataka<br />
3 AICRP on Dryland Agriculture, CRIDA, Hyderabad, Telangana State<br />
*halidoddiraju@gmail.com<br />
The long-term field experiment was conducted to find out the catchment–storage-command<br />
relationship for enhancing water productivity in micro catchment <strong>of</strong> UAS campus, Raichur. A<br />
square shaped (trapezoidal section) farm pond <strong>of</strong> size 18x18 m top width 10x10 m bottom width<br />
and2.70 m depth was excavated in the year 2017 in the dry land research plot at UAS, Raichur<br />
campus. The total capacity <strong>of</strong> the pond was 547.0 m 3 . The catchment and command area were<br />
delineated as 8 and 1 ha respectively. During the year 2020, 61 number <strong>of</strong> rainy days were<br />
recorded, <strong>of</strong> which, 19 numbers were run<strong>of</strong>f causing rainfall events as a result, the pond was<br />
filled and nine times and over flowed after exceeding its full capacity <strong>of</strong> 547.0 m 3 . This shows<br />
that, there is a scope to harvest more quantity <strong>of</strong> run<strong>of</strong>f water. Most <strong>of</strong> the run<strong>of</strong>f events were<br />
occurred during the month <strong>of</strong> May, June, July, August, September, and October. The May, June,<br />
July, August, September, and October months have received the rainfall <strong>of</strong> 130.4, 128.0, 296.6,<br />
164.4, 317.6, 179.6 mm respectively. Due to good rain in these months, the Pigeonpea crop<br />
during Kharif and groundnut crop during Rabi stand was good due to enough moisture in the<br />
soil pr<strong>of</strong>ile. The water balance <strong>of</strong> the pond revealed that 438.68 m 3 <strong>of</strong> water was lost through<br />
evaporation and seepage losses together during the period from 27-09-2020 to 24-03-2021 (6<br />
months). The remaining 108.32 m 3 <strong>of</strong> water which was available in the pond was used for<br />
supplemental irrigation to the groundnut crop with an irrigation depth <strong>of</strong> 1.08 cm for a 0.485 ha<br />
area which amounted to 109 m 3 <strong>of</strong> water. The irrigation was given on two days i.e on 25-03-<br />
2021 and 26-03-2021. The sediment yield was also calculated by collecting the run<strong>of</strong>f samples<br />
from the run<strong>of</strong>f events. The highest amount <strong>of</strong> sediment was recorded on 19-09-2021 which is<br />
0.35 t/ha against the rainfall <strong>of</strong> 83.6 mm and run<strong>of</strong>f volume <strong>of</strong> 1526.6 m 3 .<br />
Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance<br />
97 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
T1-36 P-1400<br />
Impact <strong>of</strong> Raising Bund Height Around Rice Field on Water Management,<br />
Growth, Yield and Economics<br />
Deokaran 1 , Ramkewal 1 , Mandhata Singh 1 , Ujjwal Kumar 1 , A Upadhyay 1 , Amrendra<br />
Kumar 1 , Anjani Kumar 1 , Hari Govid 2 and Arif Parvez 2<br />
1 ICAR-RCER, Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Lalganj, Buxar-802103, Bihar<br />
2 ICAR ATARI Zone-IV, Patna, Bihar-14<br />
The rice acreage <strong>of</strong> the world under irrigated, rainfed, upland and flood prone ecosystems are<br />
55%, 25%, 13% and 7%, respectively. Contribution <strong>of</strong> rice yield as percentage <strong>of</strong> global rice<br />
production from irrigated, rainfed, upland and flood prone ecosystems are 76%, 17%, 4% and<br />
3%, respectively (IRRI., 1993). The productivity <strong>of</strong> rainfed rice ecosystem is observed to be<br />
quite lower than that <strong>of</strong> the irrigated rice ecosystem, which emphasizes that assured irrigation<br />
water supply plays a crucial role in determining rice production. In rainfed ecosystem, the<br />
general tendency <strong>of</strong> the farmers are to store maximum rainwater in the cropped fields to combat<br />
moisture deficiency during dry spells due to lack <strong>of</strong> regular sources <strong>of</strong> irrigation water, This<br />
storage is achieved by strengthening the bund height. Water resource development has played<br />
an important role in livelihood improvement and poverty alleviation by improving food<br />
security, protecting against drought, providing access to water, and increasing cropped area. In<br />
rainfed rice ecosystem, conservation <strong>of</strong> rainwater to maximum extent can reduce<br />
the supplemental irrigation water requirement <strong>of</strong> the crop and drainage need <strong>of</strong> the catchment.<br />
Pre-monsoon, monsoon and post monsoon precipitation during rainy season causes sub surface<br />
soil erosion, nutrient depletion by run<strong>of</strong>f and sometimes flood situation and crop damage<br />
resulting which reduces production and productivity <strong>of</strong> soil. While on the other hand; scattered<br />
and uneven rainfall, long intervals in dry spell and rainy days, creates prolonged droughts<br />
situation during the crop growth period have become a common occurrence in previous years<br />
observations. The productivity <strong>of</strong> the rain-fed rice ecosystem is observed to be significantly<br />
lower than that <strong>of</strong> the irrigated rice ecosystem. This underlined that assured irrigation plays a<br />
crucial role to determining rice production. This storage is and can be achieved by<br />
strengthening the field bund height (raising bund height and its maintenance). The objective <strong>of</strong><br />
this study was to assessed the conservation <strong>of</strong> rainwater in rice fields through raising heights<br />
surrounding rice field.<br />
Methodology<br />
Case study was conducted for three consecutive years (2019–2021) under National Innovation<br />
onClimate Resilient Agriculture Project, NICRA –TDC at Krishi Vigyan Kendra Buxar,<br />
Adopted Village; Kukurah and Suroundha at 65 farmers field. The benchmark survey and<br />
participatory rural appraisal (PRA) technique were used for selection <strong>of</strong> participants and<br />
98 | Page Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
capacity building <strong>of</strong> farmers wereup skilled through training and experienced learning on<br />
conservation <strong>of</strong> rain water harvesting in rice field. The soil was loamy clay andhave deep<br />
percolation rate with Rice- Wheat cropping system. Technology demonstration component<br />
raising bund height (dimension 60x45x45 cm) have been demonstrated in 85.2 ha area <strong>of</strong><br />
leveled rice field at 65 farmers field <strong>of</strong> village and the rainfall were stored up to 35 cm weir<br />
height plots, the existing farmers practice was symbolic field bunds (unshaped, zigzag<br />
shapelump sum
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Conclusion<br />
The economics <strong>of</strong> demonstrated plot reveals that the net return is Rs 53780 ha -1 and the benefit<br />
cost ratio is 2.64. The average rain water 3750 m 3 ha -1 was stored during the crop season while<br />
the average rainfall was 934 mm. The area brought under rabi season were from 19.1 to 59.6<br />
ha in rabi 2018-19, 25.30 to 67.6 ha in 2019-20 and 27.65 to 120.1 ha in 2020-21 by using<br />
residual moisture. Keeping in view the aspects <strong>of</strong> conserving rainwater, sediment and nutrient<br />
and minimizing irrigation requirement, 30–45 cm <strong>of</strong> bund height is suitable for rice fields.<br />
T1-37 P-1416<br />
Performance <strong>of</strong> Land Shaping as a Climate Smart Model for the<br />
Sundarban<br />
P. K. Garain 1 , C. K. Mondal 1 , A. Saha 1 and F. H. Rahman 2<br />
1 Ramkrishna Ashram Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Nimpith, South 24 Parganas, West Bengal – 743338,<br />
India<br />
2 ICAR-Agricultural Technology Application Research Institute, Bhumi Vihar Complex, Block- GB,<br />
Sector- III, Salt Lake, Kolkata -700097, West Bengal, India<br />
Sundarban, the world’s largest contiguous stretch <strong>of</strong> mangrove forest, is highly vulnerable to<br />
tropical cyclones, tidal surges and erratic distribution <strong>of</strong> rainfall, leading to intensive rain spells<br />
and dry spells. The frequency <strong>of</strong> severe cyclonic storms is also increasing in the northern part<br />
<strong>of</strong> Bay <strong>of</strong> Bengal. The last two decades has witnessed seven severe cyclones - Sidr, Nargis,<br />
Bijli, Aila, Fani, Bulbul, Amphun and Yaas. High storm surge <strong>of</strong>ten breaches the river<br />
embankment, forcing saline river water to inundate the inland. Intensive rainfall within short<br />
period <strong>of</strong> time leads to prolonged submergence <strong>of</strong> the ill drained and low-lying crop fields<br />
where long duration and low yielding traditional rice varieties are the only option. The winter<br />
and summer seasons witness acute dearth <strong>of</strong> freshwater for irrigation, rendering huge areas to<br />
remain fallow. Such climatic vagaries add anguish to the livelihood <strong>of</strong> the 4.5 million people<br />
residing in the coastal Sundarbans, who primarily depend on agriculture and forest resources<br />
for their sustenance. Poor economic return from farming forces the population to migrate to the<br />
nearby towns, in search <strong>of</strong> alternate livelihood. To address such climatic vulnerabilities, a<br />
project titled “National Innovations on Climate Resilient Agriculture” (NICRA) was<br />
implemented by Ramkrishna Ashram Krishi Vigyan Kendra (RAKVK), in collaboration with<br />
Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture (ICAR-CRIDA), Hyderabad and<br />
Agricultural Technology Application Research Institute (ICAR-ATARI) Kolkata from 2011 to<br />
2021, in the cyclone prone villages <strong>of</strong> Sundarbans (NICRA News, 2011). The present study<br />
was aimed at comparing the performance <strong>of</strong> land shaping technology in the coastal Sundarbans<br />
situation, both during climate stress and normal weather condition, against the traditional<br />
farming practice.<br />
100 | Page Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Methodology<br />
The study was conducted in Bongheri village under the Kultali block <strong>of</strong> the South 24 Parganas<br />
district in West Bengal (Latitude: 22 o 2’3” N to 22 o 3’11” N; Longitude: 88 o 37’5” E to 88 o<br />
38’11” E).<br />
Land shaping and crop planning: One-fifth portion <strong>of</strong> a 0.26 ha plot was excavated to create<br />
a farm pond (0.05 ha). The excavated soil was used to raise the remaining plot upto 1-ft height<br />
and strengthen the land and pond embankments upto 3-ft height with a top width <strong>of</strong> 3 ft.<br />
Submergence tolerant and short duration (115 days) rice variety Ciherang sub-1 was grown on<br />
the elevated land (0.18 ha). Okra (0.01 ha), bittergourd (0.01 ha) and bottlegourd (0.01 ha)<br />
were planted on land and pond embankment during kharif (Table 1). In winter, brinjal and chilli<br />
were grown on the main field (0.15 ha) and land embankment (0.03 ha), respectively.<br />
Cucumber was grown (0.17 ha) in summer. Mixed fish farming was taken up in the pond (0.05<br />
ha).<br />
Farmers practice: Traditional rice variety Dudheswar was grown on 0.26 ha plot under<br />
medium land situation (1.5 ft water stagnation), during July to November. Lathyrus was sown<br />
as paira crop on 0.1 ha area.<br />
Data collection: 2019 was considered as “stress year” as it encountered two cyclones (Fani in<br />
May and Bulbul in November), intensive rainfall (120 mm and 94 mm), prolonged<br />
submergence after transplantation <strong>of</strong> rice (August), dry spells <strong>of</strong> more than 10 days (June and<br />
July), untimely rain (February and November) and 39% rainfall deficiency in kharif. The data<br />
<strong>of</strong> 2018 was taken as “normal year”. Both the practices (farmers practice and land shaping)<br />
were implemented in 15 farmers’ field <strong>of</strong> 0.26 ha size, separately.<br />
Results<br />
Land shaping <strong>of</strong>fered scope <strong>of</strong> multiple cropping to the farmers as the cropping intensity<br />
increased to 254%. The elevated terrain became suitable for growing short duration and HYV<br />
rice. The vegetables, grown on the raised embankment were saved from prolonged water<br />
stagnation during intensive rainfall. The pond rainwater was used for irrigation during dry<br />
spells in 2019 and sustaining fishery throughout the year. Assured irrigation also allowed to<br />
grow vegetables in winter and summer season. Both during a normal year and stressful weather,<br />
the average net income was significantly higher from the land shaping plot in comparison to<br />
farmers practice. Even after cyclone Bulbul (November, 2019) the land shaping farmers<br />
suffered a minimum crop loss due to timely harvest <strong>of</strong> their short duration rice and improved<br />
drainage. Such farmers could also take up rabi vegetable in time, whereas there was 25-30%<br />
loss <strong>of</strong> rice and 100% loss <strong>of</strong> lathyrus under farmers practice. Land shaping has been reported<br />
to maximize farm income, even during climatic hazards (Rahman et al., 2016).<br />
Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance<br />
101 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Interven<br />
tion<br />
Farmers<br />
practice<br />
(0.26 ha)<br />
Land<br />
shaping<br />
plot<br />
(0.26 ha)<br />
Production and economics <strong>of</strong> land shaping plot over farmers’ practice (Rs./ 0.26 ha/ year)<br />
Weat<br />
her<br />
Norm<br />
al<br />
year<br />
Stress<br />
year<br />
Norm<br />
al<br />
year<br />
Stress<br />
year<br />
Rice:<br />
6.84±0.06*<br />
Rice:<br />
5.55±0.13<br />
Production (q) in different season<br />
Kharif Rabi Summer<br />
Rice: 8.28±0.05<br />
Okra: 1.32±0.01<br />
Bitter gourd: 3.27±0.02<br />
Bottle gourd: 3.05±0.02<br />
Rice: 7.74±0.06<br />
Okra: 1.30±0.01<br />
Bitter gourd: 3.05±0.02<br />
Bottle gourd: 2.04±0.02<br />
Lathyrus:<br />
0.36±0.01<br />
Lathyrus:<br />
total crop<br />
loss<br />
Brinjal:<br />
47.70±0.43<br />
Chilli:<br />
3.12±0.04<br />
Fish: 1.50±0.01 (year-round)<br />
Brinjal:<br />
43.08±0.32<br />
Chilli:<br />
2.71±0.03<br />
Fish: 1.42±0.01 (year-round)<br />
Fallow<br />
Fallow<br />
Cucumber:<br />
18.58±0.24<br />
Cucumber:<br />
13.42±0.16<br />
Cost <strong>of</strong><br />
cultiva<br />
tion<br />
Gross<br />
return<br />
Net<br />
return<br />
B:C<br />
ratio<br />
6272±4<br />
1 a 13377±1<br />
16 b 7105±13<br />
9 b 2.13<br />
6015±3<br />
5 a 9990±22<br />
8 a 3975±21<br />
8 a 1.66<br />
50051±<br />
106 b 143130±<br />
891 d 93079±9<br />
31 d 2.92<br />
54420±<br />
150 c 126157±<br />
566 c 71738±5<br />
83 c 2.32<br />
SEm (±) 95.75 529.98 537.49<br />
CD (p=0.05) 273.29 1512.56 1534.01<br />
* Data represents mean <strong>of</strong> 15 observations ± standard error; abcd Data superscripted with same<br />
alphabets within a column are not significantly different at p≤0.05 on the basis <strong>of</strong> Tukey’s HSD<br />
Conclusion<br />
Land shaping technology is an effective climate resilient technology for the coastal Sundarbans<br />
farming situation. It not only provides additional income to the farm family but also engages<br />
the family members in farming, throughout the year, thus reducing chance <strong>of</strong> migration.<br />
References<br />
NICRA News. 2011. Land shaping to alleviate Aila effects, Nimpith, South 24 Parganas, West<br />
Bengal, Monthly e-Newsletter on Climate Resilient Agriculture, Pub. by CRIDA,<br />
Hyderabad, 1(3): 7.<br />
Rahman, F.H., Ghosh, D., Das, K.S., Mondal, S.K., Pal, P.P. and Roy, S.K. 2016. Monocropped<br />
fallow lowlands converted to multiple cropping options, In: NICRA<br />
Newsletter: Towards Climate Smart Agriculture, Pub. by ICAR-ATARI Kolkata, 2(2): 7.<br />
102 | Page Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
T1-38 P-1424<br />
Irrigation Requirement <strong>of</strong> Different Crops <strong>of</strong> Krishna Basin Under<br />
Changing Climatic Scenarios<br />
D. Kalyana Srinivas, R. Rejani, G.S. Pratyusha Kranthi, K.V. Rao and S. Deepika<br />
ICAR- Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, Hyderabad-500059<br />
Indian agriculture is severely affected by climate change due to increased crop water<br />
requirement and decreased availability <strong>of</strong> water, particularly in drylands (Behera et al., 2016).<br />
The rise in surface temperature increases the evaporation rates, influences the precipitation,<br />
leads to extreme events and affects the soil moisture. Human activities, along with increased<br />
evapotranspiration and decreases in precipitation, have resulted in desertification in some<br />
drylands. The prolonged dry spell in rainfed areas reduces the growing period and crop<br />
productivity by causing water stress. Irrigation is the efficient usage <strong>of</strong> fresh water, and with<br />
the growing scarcity <strong>of</strong> this essential natural resource, it is becoming increasingly important to<br />
maximize efficiency <strong>of</strong> water usage. It implies accurate management <strong>of</strong> irrigation and control<br />
<strong>of</strong> application depths in order to apply water effectively according to crop needs. Assessing<br />
irrigation and agriculture potential is an important activity in successful agriculture<br />
management.<br />
Methodology<br />
The study area covers parts <strong>of</strong> four large states namely, Karnataka, Maharashtra, Andhra<br />
Pradesh and Telangana with a geographical area <strong>of</strong> 258,000 km 2 (nearly 8% <strong>of</strong> India). The<br />
basin has a maximum length and width <strong>of</strong> about 701 km and 672 km and lies between 73°17'<br />
to 81°9' east longitudes and 13°10' to 19°22' north latitudes. Most <strong>of</strong> the basin is relatively flat<br />
and 90% lies below 750 m elevation. However, elevations in the Western Ghats reach up to<br />
1,900 m. Soils in the basin are generally shallow and clayey, with some areas <strong>of</strong> gravelly clay<br />
and loam. Soil types (based on the Soil Taxonomy classification system, NRCS 1999) include<br />
Entisols and Vertisols (black cotton soils) in the west and Alfisols (red soils) in the south and<br />
east. Soils tend to be deeper in valley bottoms and are deeper on average in Andhra Pradesh.<br />
The average annual rainfall <strong>of</strong> the basin is 784 mm. Dry spells are commonly experienced<br />
during July, August and September which concur with the vegetative or prolific stages <strong>of</strong> major<br />
rainfed crops which in turn affects the crop yield drastically. It is possible to increase the yield<br />
<strong>of</strong> pigeon pea, kharif maize, rabi maize and groundnut crops, by providing supplemental<br />
irrigations during critical growth stages significantly. To ensure the long-term sustainability <strong>of</strong><br />
these crops, an attempt is made to find the irrigation water requirement <strong>of</strong> these crops <strong>of</strong><br />
Krishna basin spatially for present and future scenarios.<br />
Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance<br />
103 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Results<br />
Site specific irrigation requirement <strong>of</strong> major crops was determined based on data availability<br />
for future scenarios, Hargreaves and Samani (1985) method was used instead <strong>of</strong> FAO Penman-<br />
Monteith method (Allen et al., 1998) for ETo calculation. Crop water requirement was<br />
estimated for pigeon pea, kharif maize, rabi maize and groundnut. The ensemble data <strong>of</strong> CMIP<br />
5.0 corresponding to two emission scenarios RCP 4.5 and RCP 6.0 was used. During the base<br />
line period, the irrigation requirement <strong>of</strong> pigeon pea, kharif maize, rabi maize and groundnut<br />
varied spatially from 87.9 mm to 267.2 mm, 32.7 mm to 189.9 mm, 306.1 mm to 373.6 mm,<br />
and 28.4 mm to 155.7 mm respectively, by 2030s under RCP 4.5, for pigeon pea, kharif maize,<br />
rabi maize and groundnut, it is expected to vary from -10.7 to 7.6 %, -29.8 to 17.5%, 1.5 to 3.6<br />
% and -5.9 to 3.0 % respectively. For RCP 6.0, for pigeon pea, kharif maize, rabi maize and<br />
groundnut, it is expected to vary from -9.3 to 12.7 %, -28.3 to 17.9%, 1.2 to 3.5 % and -4.2 to<br />
3.5 % respectively. According to the results, climate change has a considerable impact on the<br />
sustainability <strong>of</strong> the prevailing cropping system in Krishna Basin.<br />
104 | Page Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Variation in the irrigation requirement <strong>of</strong> pigeon pea, kharif maize, rabi maize and groundnut at<br />
Krishna basin under RCP 4.5 and 6.0 (2030s)<br />
Conclusion<br />
The irrigation requirement predicted for pigeon pea, kharif maize, rabi maize and groundnut<br />
are varying substantially at Krishna Basin in coming years’/future scenarios. Due to the<br />
significant spatial variation in irrigation requirements <strong>of</strong> major crops, irrigation scheduling at<br />
sites in the Krishna basin needs to be site-specific irrigation scheduling. From this study, it<br />
was concluded that in future, the basin requires site specific water policy changes to ensure<br />
the constant sustainability <strong>of</strong> crops.<br />
References<br />
Allen RG, Pereira LS, Raes D and Smith M. 1998. Crop Evapotranspiration-Guidelines for<br />
computing crop water requirements. FAO Irrigation and drainage paper 56. FAO,<br />
Rome, 300 (9): D05109.<br />
Behera S, Khare D, Mishra PK and Sahoo S. 2016. Impact <strong>of</strong> climate change on crop water<br />
requirement for Sunei medium irrigation project, Odisha, India. International Journal<br />
<strong>of</strong> Engineering Trends and Technology, 34 (8): 358-367.<br />
Hargreaves GH and Samani ZA. 1985. Reference crop evapotranspiration from temperature.<br />
Applied Engineering Agricultural, 1 (2): 96-99.<br />
Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance<br />
105 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
DK and Sarangi A. (2015). Strategies for climate change impacts on irrigated crops in<br />
National Capital Region <strong>of</strong> India. Journal <strong>of</strong> Applied and Natural Sciences, 7 (1): 388-<br />
393.<br />
Rejani R, Rao KV, Shirahatti MS, Surakod VS, Yogitha P, Chary GR, Gopinath KA, Osman<br />
M, Sammi Reddy K and Srinivasa Rao Ch. 2016. Irrigation requirement <strong>of</strong> crops under<br />
changing climatic scenarios in a semi-arid region <strong>of</strong> Northern Karnataka. Indian<br />
Journal <strong>of</strong> Dryland Agricultural Research & Development, 31 (2): 51-60.<br />
Impact <strong>of</strong> Borewell Recharging Structures in NICRA Village<br />
G. Hiregoudar, N.H. Bhandi, Gururaj Kombali<br />
ICAR-K.H.Patil Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Hulkoti, Gadag<br />
T1-39 P-1430<br />
Gadag district is one <strong>of</strong> the drought-prone districts that comes under the agro-climatic zone <strong>of</strong><br />
Northern Dry Zone-3 and Region-2 <strong>of</strong> Karnataka State. The climate <strong>of</strong> the district is semi-arid<br />
and annual rainfall <strong>of</strong> the district is 641 mm. Rainfall is usually erratic and the probability <strong>of</strong><br />
agriculture drought is to the extent <strong>of</strong> 70 percent <strong>of</strong> the year. Long dry spells between two rains<br />
during June to September affects the crop yield and thereby the livelihood <strong>of</strong> the farmers. Out<br />
<strong>of</strong> 10 years rainfall cycle, farmers face 7 years <strong>of</strong> agricultural drought. Nearly, 30 percent <strong>of</strong><br />
the district soil type is red sandy loam. In the district, 12 to 15 percent area is under irrigation<br />
which too in Malaprabha Command Area in the Naragund block. The remaining 6 blocks <strong>of</strong><br />
the district are under rainfed. Farmers mainly cultivate greengram, groundnut, Bt. cotton and<br />
maize crops in kharif season, sorghum and bengalgram crops in rabi season. The crops are<br />
non-remunerative due to moisture stress during agricultural drought years. Mahalingapur<br />
cluster <strong>of</strong> villages comprising <strong>of</strong> Mahalingapur, Nabhapur, Kabalayatakatti and Beladhadi are<br />
tribal hamlets located in Kappatagudda hill terrain <strong>of</strong> the district. These villages are not an<br />
exception to climate vulnerability. Frequent occurrence <strong>of</strong> early, mid and terminal drought in<br />
kharif season has severely affected the productivity <strong>of</strong> field crops. The cluster village<br />
Mahalingapur is adopted by ICAR-KVK, Gadag since 2015-16 under the project “National<br />
Innovations in Climate Resilient Agriculture (NICRA)” with the support <strong>of</strong> Indian Council <strong>of</strong><br />
Agricultural Research, New Delhi. The relevant climate resilient technologies have been<br />
implemented in these cluster villages. Under the Natural Resource Management, bore well<br />
recharging technology has been adapted for 17 numbers <strong>of</strong> bore wells covering 17 farmers<br />
during 2017 in the project village. This bore well recharging technology has resulted in good<br />
impact on increase in area under protective irrigation in the village from 2018 to 2021.In a span<br />
<strong>of</strong> 4 years (2018 to 2021), village received 74 mm run-<strong>of</strong>f causing rains, which helped to<br />
harvest excess run <strong>of</strong>f rain water and intern recharging <strong>of</strong> ground water through these bore<br />
wells.<br />
106 | Page Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Total 229 lakhs liters <strong>of</strong> water is harvested that resulted in rise <strong>of</strong> ground water table upto 8.9<br />
meters. This in turn helped to increase area under protective irrigation in kharif (26.60<br />
hectares), rabi (19.80 hectares) and summer (11.20 hectares) seasons.<br />
In this protective irrigated area various crops are cultivated. Totally in four years period,<br />
different crops like maize, rabi sorghum and bengalgram crops are cultivated in 101.40<br />
hectares area in kharif and 72.60 hectares area in rabi season. Protective irrigation provided<br />
from the recharged bore well resulted in increase in yield and net returns <strong>of</strong> different crops.<br />
There was a significant increase in yield <strong>of</strong> various crops from 34.08 to 54.94 percent and net<br />
returns <strong>of</strong> Rs.5,116/- to Rs.16,679/- per hectare. An additional return <strong>of</strong> Rs.19.96 lakhs returns<br />
was gained by the farmers during 2018 to 2021. Hence, the recharging <strong>of</strong> bore wells is very<br />
important in the rainfed area to enhance the economic status <strong>of</strong> the farmers even during climatic<br />
variations.<br />
T1-40 P-1432<br />
Recycling <strong>of</strong> Harvested Rainwater through Farm Pond to Enhance<br />
Productivity <strong>of</strong> rabi Crops under Semi-Arid Region<br />
J.K. Balyan, Manjeet Singh 2 and R.K. Sharma 3<br />
1,3<br />
Dryland Farming Research Station, Arjia, Bhilwara,<br />
2<br />
College <strong>of</strong> Technology and Agriculture Engineering, Udaipur<br />
Maharana Pratap University <strong>of</strong> Agriculture and Technology, Udaipur (Rajasthan)<br />
A field experiment was conducted during rabi season 2016-17 to 2019-2020 in Inceptisol to<br />
explore the possibilities rainwater harvesting and recycling for the purpose <strong>of</strong> raising rabi crops<br />
to enhance the crop productivity and water productivity <strong>of</strong> Nadi system in semi-arid areas under<br />
All India Coordinated Research Development Project at Dryland Farming Research Station<br />
(Maharana Pratap University <strong>of</strong> Agriculture and Technology, Udaipur), Arjia, Bhilwara<br />
(Latitude 24”20’N and 74”40’ Longitude and 432 meter above sea level), Rajasthan. The site<br />
soils <strong>of</strong> experimental field were sandy clay loam in texture having pH 8.11, organic carbon<br />
0.42%, E.C. 0.44 dSm-1, bulk density1.51 gm cc -1 , the available N, P2O5 and K2O in soils were<br />
243.56,21.52 and 416.27 kg ha -1 , respectively. The field capacity and permanent wilting point<br />
moisture <strong>of</strong> surface soil layer was 21.4 and 9.2% on weight basis, respectively. There were<br />
three main plot treatments <strong>of</strong> crops as C 1-Lentil, C 2-Chickpea and C 3-Mustard and three in sub<br />
treatment <strong>of</strong> irrigation methods such as I0- Control (conserved moisture), I1- One irrigation at<br />
45 DAS and I 2- Two irrigation at 45 & 60 DAS. These treatments were laid out in Split plot<br />
design with three replications. Among the different crops, lentil crop gave 162% higher mean<br />
mustard seed equivalent yield (1765 kg ha -1 ) in comparison to linseed (672 kg ha -1 ). However,<br />
application <strong>of</strong> supplemental irrigation at 45 DAS and 45 & 60 DAS was increased mean<br />
Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance<br />
107 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
mustard seed equivalent yield and recorded 63 and 91% higher over no irrigation (857 kg ha -<br />
1<br />
), respectively. Similarly, among the different crops, lentil crop obtained highest net returns<br />
(Rs. 56359.00 ha -1 ), benefit cost ratio (3.37) and water use efficiency (1.775 kg seed Cum -1 ).<br />
Further, application <strong>of</strong> one supplemental irrigation at 45 DAS was recorded higher WUE (1.377<br />
kg seed cum -1 ) as compared to two supplemental irrigations at 45 DAS & 60 DAS (0.944 kg<br />
seed Cum -1 ) but higher soil moisture content was recorded under two supplemental irrigations<br />
at 45 DAS & 60 DAS at all the three depth in all three crops at harvest in comparison to one<br />
irrigation and control. This might be attributed to that increase in mustard seed equivalent is<br />
not in proportion to the amount <strong>of</strong> supplement irrigation water. Therefore, it may be concluded<br />
that growing <strong>of</strong> lentil crop during rabi season with one supplemental irrigation at 45 DAS is<br />
more beneficial to get the higher production in semi-arid regions.<br />
References<br />
M.L. Jat, J.K. Balyan, Vuivek Kumar, Y.S. Rathi, R. Charry and S. Ojha. 2018. Feasibility <strong>of</strong> farm pond<br />
and recycling system to enhance productivity <strong>of</strong> rabi crops under semi-arid regions. Ind. J. Soil<br />
conserve 46 (1): 60-67.<br />
Jat M.L., Balyan J.K., Sammauria R. 2010. Effect <strong>of</strong> in-situ moisture conservation practices on<br />
productivity and economics under maize+blackgram cropping system in semi-arid region. Ind.<br />
Soil. conserv. 38 (1): 59-61.<br />
T1-41P-1449<br />
Rain Water Harvesting Technology, Jalkund - A Boon for Far Flung Hilly<br />
Farmers Under NICRA<br />
R. Lalrambeiseia, Henry Saplalrinliana, F. Lalthasanga<br />
Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Hnahthial, Lunglei District, Mizoram - 796571<br />
Hnahthial village <strong>of</strong> Lunglei District has a total geographical area <strong>of</strong> about 16 sq km. The<br />
average annual rainfall is about 2000mm.The village receives high rainfall but lacks rain water<br />
harvesting structures and management leading to severe water scarcity, particularly during the<br />
post monsoon season (November -April). Rainwater storage and harmonious Water Use<br />
Efficiency (WUE) are the key to sustainable livelihood in the village. Under NICRA Project,<br />
KVK Lunglei demonstrated 75 numbers <strong>of</strong> low-cost rain water harvesting technology<br />
‘Jalkund’ in NICRA adopted village and its adjoining villages. The low-cost material like<br />
Polyethylene pond liners (200 GSM) was used to construct pond generally with a size <strong>of</strong><br />
5x4x1.5m. The storage capacity <strong>of</strong> these tanks is in the range <strong>of</strong> 30000L 3 . Construction <strong>of</strong><br />
Jalkund and recycling <strong>of</strong> water through this system increase the productivity <strong>of</strong> the farmers<br />
by diversifying farming system like crop and livestock. As noticed in Hnahthial and its<br />
satellite villages, Jalkund technology had uncountable big and small impacts on the livelihood<br />
<strong>of</strong> the farmers.<br />
108 | Page Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
T1-42 P-1462<br />
In-Situ Moisture Conservation and Natural Nitrification Inhibitors for<br />
Adaptation and Mitigation <strong>of</strong> Climate Change in Semi-Arid Rainfed<br />
Regions<br />
G.Pratibha*, K.V.Rao, I.Srinivas, A.K.Indoria, Sumanta Kundu, M.Srinivasa Rao,<br />
Shivakumar A, K.Srinivasa Rao, M.Prabhakar, B.M.K.Raju, K.Sammi Reddy and<br />
V.K.Singh<br />
Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, Hyderabad, Telangana, 500059, India<br />
*G.Pratibha@icar.gov.in<br />
The rainfed regions are characterised by frequent dry spells and uneven distribution <strong>of</strong> rainfall,<br />
during cropping season. The dry spells <strong>of</strong> two weeks or more may occur after seed<br />
germination, or during different growth stages <strong>of</strong> crop and this result in moisture stress<br />
conditions leading to decline in crop productivity and may also sometimes cause total crop<br />
failure. Therefore, for the sustainable production requires adoption <strong>of</strong> location specific in-situ<br />
soil moisture conservation technologies are need <strong>of</strong> the hour. In addition to moisture stress,<br />
low nitrogen use efficiency are also the main causes for low yields in the rainfed farming.<br />
Nitrogen (N) is an essential nutrient and a limiting factor for plant growth in most soils. The<br />
rising human population, especially in developing countries, has led to agricultural<br />
intensification with a high input <strong>of</strong> reactive N from chemical fertilizers. But the nitrogen use<br />
efficiency was low in general and in rainfed regions in particular. Improper time <strong>of</strong> application<br />
<strong>of</strong> nitrogen fertilizer results in low nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) and gaseous losses <strong>of</strong> nitrous<br />
oxide (N 2 O) and ammonia (NH 3 ). Nitrous oxide is a potent greenhouse gas (GHG) with global<br />
warming potential <strong>of</strong> 298 times greater than CO 2 emission. Nitrification and denitrification<br />
are the major biological processes responsible for N2O production. N 2 O levels in the<br />
atmosphere are raising at an alarming rate and are likely to quadruple by 2050. Hence suitable<br />
measures are required to reduce such emissions and increase the nitrogen fertilizer use<br />
efficiency. Arresting nitrification could be an important strategy to improve nitrogen (N)<br />
recovery and agronomic N use efficiency where the loss <strong>of</strong> N is significant and leads to<br />
environmental pollution. Nitrification inhibitor could lower N 2 O emission and increase the<br />
crop productivity by reducing nitrification rate and increasing NUE through enhanced NH + 4<br />
uptake. Though chemicals known to inhibit nitrifies and have been tested, but many <strong>of</strong> these<br />
chemicals use is not practical because <strong>of</strong> their high cost, limited availability, negative impact<br />
on beneficial soil microorganisms, and above all, poor extension and promotional activities<br />
are major constraints in this respect. Therefore, it is essential to develop plant-based<br />
nitrification inhibitors (natural nitrification inhibitors, NNI) for augmenting nitrogen use<br />
efficiency, crop productivity, and for safe guarding the environment. The advantages <strong>of</strong> NNI<br />
Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance<br />
109 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
are that they are easily available, cheap, and eco-friendly. These nitrification inhibitors can be<br />
coated to urea by the farmers. Keeping in this view, an experiment was initiated in maize-<br />
castor cropping to develop strategies for enhancing adaption and mitigation <strong>of</strong> climate change.<br />
Methodology<br />
Field experiments were conducted in maize-castor annual rotation during 2012-2017 at<br />
Gunegal Research Farm (GRF) <strong>of</strong> the Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture<br />
(CRIDA), Hyderabad, India (17◦23′N latitude, 78◦29′E longitude, altitude 540 m above mean<br />
sea level) in the semi-arid region <strong>of</strong> Southern part <strong>of</strong> India. Average seasonal (June–January)<br />
rainfall during the experimental season was 510 mm, which accounts for approximately 42%<br />
<strong>of</strong> annual potential evapo-transpiration. The soil at the experimental site represents Typic<br />
Haplustalf. The arable part <strong>of</strong> the soil consists <strong>of</strong> 71.10% sand, 6.30% silt and 22.60% clay.<br />
The experiment was laid out in split plot design with three replications. The treatments<br />
comprised <strong>of</strong> flat sowing, conservation furrow and tank silt application in main plots. The<br />
conservation furrow was made between the crop rows at the time <strong>of</strong> sowing with the<br />
implement fabricated at ICAR-CRIDA. This implement used for sowing, fertilizer application<br />
and conservation furrow at a time. Urea treated with natural plant products to retard<br />
nitrification <strong>of</strong> urea were taken as sub plots. The different natural nitrification inhibitors tested<br />
were neem cake, Karanj cake, Vitex leaf powder these were compared with FYM, un coated<br />
urea. The test crops were cultivated with all the recommended package <strong>of</strong> practices.<br />
Recommended dose <strong>of</strong> other fertilizer (P and K) was applied uniformly in all the treatments.<br />
Results<br />
In this study the different in-situ moisture conservation practices and nitrification inhibitors<br />
significantly influenced the yield and GHG emissions. It was also observed that differential<br />
impact <strong>of</strong> these practices on yield and N 2O emissions were observed in different years due<br />
inter annual variation <strong>of</strong> rainfall. Among the three moisture conservation treatments,<br />
conservation furrow recorded higher maize equivalent seed yield as compared to normal<br />
sowing and tank silt application. The yield increase ranged between 38 to 11 %. The yield<br />
improvement in in situ moisture conservation was higher in low rainfall years. Tank silt<br />
application recorded higher yield over normal sowing whereas tank silt application recorded<br />
higher yield than in-situ moisture conservation only during high rainfall years.<br />
All the natural nitrification inhibitors recorded higher maize equivalent yields as compared to<br />
urea and 50% nitrogen through FYM + 50% N through urea. Among the natural nitrification<br />
inhibitors Vitex coated urea recorded higher yields as compared to FYM + 50% N through<br />
urea, Karajin cake, neem cake coated urea, and urea alone respectively.<br />
GHG fluxes were recorded in different treatments. It was observed that CO 2 fluxes were not<br />
influenced by in-situ moisture conservation methods. Karanj cake coated, and neem cake<br />
110 | Page Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
coated urea treatments did not reduce the CO 2 emissions. Higher N 2 O fluxes were observed<br />
immediately after fertilizer application. Among natural nitrification inhibitors, vitex cake<br />
coated urea recorded lower N 2 O fluxes and this was followed by neem cake coated urea.<br />
Conclusion<br />
In- situ moisture conservation practices and Coating <strong>of</strong> urea with natural nitrification<br />
inhibitors were found quite effective for adaptation and mitigation <strong>of</strong> climate change in semiarid<br />
rainfed regions.<br />
3000<br />
Yields, kg/ha<br />
2000<br />
1000<br />
0<br />
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016<br />
Conservation Furrow FYM Conservation Furrow Karanjan cake Conservation Furrow Neem cake<br />
Conservation Furrow Normal Conservation Furrow Vavilia Normal FYM<br />
Normal Karanjan cake Normal Neem cake Normal Normal<br />
Normal Vavilia Tank silt FYM Tank silt Karanjan cake<br />
Tank silt Neem cake Tank silt Normal Tank silt Vavilia<br />
Impact <strong>of</strong> in-situ moisture conservation and natural nitrification inhibitors on crop productivity in<br />
different years<br />
T1-43P-1494<br />
Impact <strong>of</strong> Subsoiling on Soil Moisture Dynamics, soil physical properties<br />
and Yield under Finger Millet + Pigeonpea and Groundnut + Pigeonpea<br />
Cropping Systems<br />
K. Devaraja, Mudalagiriyappa, M. Madan Kumar, B. G. Vasanthi, K. M. Puneetha and<br />
H. S. Latha<br />
All India Coordinated Research Project for Dryland Agriculture, UAS, GKVK, Bangalore<br />
A subsoiler is a tractor-mounted farm implement used for deep tillage, loosening and breaking<br />
up <strong>of</strong> soil at depths twice the depth <strong>of</strong> the normal tillage implement i.e. depth more than 30cm.<br />
As subsoiler loosens the deep compacted soil, it increases the infiltration rate thereby<br />
conserving the soil moisture. Subsoiling will not overturn the top-soil but disturbs and breaks<br />
the plough layer, which result in improving the permeability <strong>of</strong> soil water, creating a "water<br />
reservoir" underneath the soil surface, increasing the efficiency <strong>of</strong> rainwater use, and improving<br />
the ability <strong>of</strong> water conservation in arid areas. Subsequently, it also minimizes the effect <strong>of</strong><br />
Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance<br />
111 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
drought and lead to an increase in crop yield. Keeping these in view, the present investigation<br />
was undertaken to assess the yield advantage and its impact on soil.<br />
Methodology<br />
The field experiment was carried out during Kharif for four years (2018-2021) at AICRP for<br />
Dry land Agriculture, Gandhi Krishi Vignana Kendra, to study the subsoiling effect on<br />
moisture conservation in finger millet + pigeon pea and groundnut + pigeon pea cropping<br />
system. The experiment was conducted in split plot design with two cropping system in main<br />
plot viz., C 1: Finger millet + Pigeon pea and C 2: Groundnut + Pigeon pea and five subsoiling<br />
treatments viz., S1: subsoiling at 2 m interval, S2: subsoiling at 4 m interval, S3: subsoiling at 2<br />
m interval with FYM, S 4: subsoiling at 4 m interval with FYM and S 5: Control in sub plots and<br />
replicated three times.<br />
Results<br />
Soil moisture content, Yield and Economics<br />
The data pertaining to soil moisture at 0-15 cm depth at different crop growing stages is<br />
presented from the year 2018 to 2021. Among the different subsoiling treatments, subsoiling<br />
at 2 m interval along with the addition <strong>of</strong> farm yard manure were found to be superior to rest<br />
<strong>of</strong> the treatments. Better root development in subsoiling treatment might be due to the better<br />
available soil moisture regime. Similar results were reported by Ramana et al. (2015). Among<br />
different sub soiling treatment during 2021 S 3 (finger millet equivalent yield: 2765 kg ha -1 , net<br />
returns: ₹. 53089 ha -1 and B:C ratio: 2.35) and S4 (finger millet equivalent yield: 2682 kg ha -1 ,<br />
net returns: ₹. 51244 ha -1 and B:C ratio: 2.35) were on par and lower yield and net returns were<br />
found in the remaining treatments. There was no significant difference among the interaction<br />
effect on finger millet equivalent yield. In comparison with the pooled data from first three<br />
years (2018-2020), subsoiling at 2 m interval with FYM showed significantly higher finger<br />
millet equivalent yield (3088 kg ha -1 ), net returns (₹. 59273 ha -1 ) and B:C ratio (2.56) and the<br />
increasing trend in the yield were S 3>S 4>S 1>S 2>S 5 during three years data (2018-2020) but the<br />
trend during 2021 was S3=S4>S1=S2=S5 which clearly showed that there was no subsoiling<br />
effect from the fourth year but due to the addition <strong>of</strong> organic manure in subsoiling at 2 m<br />
interval with FYM and subsoiling at 4 m interval with FYM for four consecutive years resulted<br />
in higher yield, net returns and benefit cost ratio. The increase in yield during 2018-2020 was<br />
due to break down <strong>of</strong> hard pan which increased the available soil moisture along with nutrient<br />
availability by the application <strong>of</strong> organic manure (Sun et al., 2017).<br />
112 | Page Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Conclusion<br />
Subsoiling at 2m interval + organic manure (S 3) resulted in higher productivity and pr<strong>of</strong>itability<br />
for three years. From fourth year subsoiling had no effect, therefore subsoiling to be<br />
implemented once in three years and addition <strong>of</strong> organic manure also helps in enhancing the<br />
productivity.<br />
References<br />
Ramana, C., Sudhakar, P., Krishna Reddy, G., Nagamadhuri, K. V., Prasanthi, T., Lavanya<br />
Kumari, P., Gridhara Krishna, T. and Hemasri, A., Economic effect <strong>of</strong> mechanical<br />
intervention through subsoiling on growth and yield <strong>of</strong> rainfed pigeonpea (Cajanus<br />
cajan). Indian J. Agric. Sci., 85 (7): 873-876.<br />
Sun, X., Zaisong Ding., Xinbing Wang., Haipeng Hou., Baoyuan Zhou., Yang Yue., Wei Ma.,<br />
Junzhu Ge., Zhimin Wang and Ming Zhao., 2017, Subsoiling practices change root<br />
distribution and increase post-anthesis dry matter accumulation and yield in summer<br />
maize. Plos One., 12 (4).<br />
Pooled data (2018-2020) and 2021 <strong>of</strong> Finger millet and ground yield and economics as<br />
influenced by subsoiling<br />
Treatment<br />
Finger millet<br />
equivalent<br />
yield<br />
Main Plot: Cropping system<br />
2018-2020 2021<br />
Net<br />
return<br />
(Rs. ha -1 )<br />
B:C<br />
ratio<br />
Finger millet<br />
equivalent<br />
yield<br />
Net<br />
return<br />
(Rs. ha -1 )<br />
B:C<br />
ratio<br />
C 1 2576 46813 2.36 2578 51802 2.50<br />
C 2 2560 43738 2.25 2114 31572 1.93<br />
S.Em± 53.19 - - 49.85 - -<br />
CD at 5 % NS - - 303.33 - -<br />
Sub plot: Subsoiling<br />
S 1 2497 41080 2.21 2110 31836 1.99<br />
S 2 2363 36576 2.04 2097 31202 1.94<br />
S 3 3088 59273 2.56 2765 53089 2.35<br />
S 4 2814 51515 2.41 2682 51244 2.35<br />
S 5 2078 37932 2.33 2078 41063 2.45<br />
S.Em± 58.45 - - 46.77 - -<br />
CD at 5 % 175.23 - - 140.21 - -<br />
Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance<br />
113 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
30<br />
S1 S2 S3 S4 S5<br />
Soil moisture content (%)<br />
25<br />
20<br />
15<br />
10<br />
5<br />
0<br />
30 DAS 60 DAS 90 DAS 30 DAS 60 DAS 90 DAS 30 DAS 60 DAS 90 DAS 30 DAS 60 DAS 90 DAS<br />
2018 2019 2020 2021<br />
Soil moisture content at 15 cm as influenced by subsoiling during 2018-2021<br />
T1-44 P-1517<br />
Checkdams - A way for Rainwater Harvesting, Climate Resilience and<br />
Sustainability <strong>of</strong> Rainfed Farmers in Ananthapuramu, Andhra Pradesh<br />
B. Chandana, Malleswari Sadhineni, V. Sivajyothi, M. Ravi Kishore, K. Naveen Kumar,<br />
J.V. Prasad and J.V.N.S. Prasad<br />
ANGRAU- Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Reddipalli, Andhra Pradesh – 515 701<br />
ICAR-ATARI, CRIDA campus, Hyderabad – 500 059<br />
TDC-NICRA, ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad – 500 059<br />
Ananthapuramu is one <strong>of</strong> the rain shadow regions <strong>of</strong> Rayalaseema in Andhra Pradesh with<br />
normal annual rainfall <strong>of</strong> 552 mm. The climate is characterized with low/ intermittent/uneven<br />
rainfall, which leads to decline in productivity <strong>of</strong> rainfed crops. Climate resilient technologies<br />
viz., checkdams will store the harvested rain water, increase groundwater availability and also<br />
prevent soil erosion (Bhargav and Tank, 2011). Checkdams control rain water run<strong>of</strong>f, rain<br />
water percolates down to the underground aquifers. Recharged aquifers will ensure ground<br />
water recharge in open wells and bore wells and create considerable opportunities to bring<br />
additional area under cultivation, increase the productivity and pr<strong>of</strong>itability <strong>of</strong> small and<br />
marginal farm holdings.<br />
114 | Page Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Methodology<br />
Construction/renovation <strong>of</strong> checkdams was taken up as a natural resource management<br />
technology during 2011 to 2021 at Chamalur, Chakrayapeta and Peravali for improving the<br />
crop productivity and socio-economic conditions <strong>of</strong> farmers under National Innovations in<br />
Climate Resilient Agriculture (NICRA) project operating at KVK, Reddipalli, Ananthapuramu<br />
district. A total <strong>of</strong> 21 checkdam were constructed/renovated in these villages. For the present<br />
study, data was collected on size <strong>of</strong> checkdam, volume <strong>of</strong> water harvested, rainfall(mm)<br />
received, no <strong>of</strong> borewells, openwells recharged and economics <strong>of</strong> crops cultivated utilizing the<br />
water stored in checkdam during 2019-2021 in the adopted villages.<br />
Results<br />
With the NRM interventions <strong>of</strong> KVK-Reddipalli under NICRA project, 21 check dams were<br />
constructed/renovated in Chamalur, Chakraypeta and Peravali villages. Farmers used to<br />
cultivate groundnut and redgram majorly depending on rainfall. During the years 2019 to 2021,<br />
nearly 35967 m 3 , 101005 m 3 , 101914 m 3 <strong>of</strong> water was harvested and stored in check dams as<br />
shown in the table. During the years 2019 to 2021, 53 open wells and 166 bore wells were<br />
recharged in these three villages. Similar findings were reported by Venkateswarlu, 2019. In<br />
addition to the groundnut crop grown earlier, farmers started cultivating castor, greengram,<br />
redgram, paddy, yellow jowar, curry leaf, tomato, bhendi, pumpkin, lily, jasmine, sweet<br />
orange, banana, custard apple, guava, acid lime, pomegranate and fodders with the harvested<br />
rain water.<br />
The net income <strong>of</strong> the farmers increased from Rs.9171/ha with cultivation <strong>of</strong> rainfed groundnut<br />
before construction <strong>of</strong> checkdams to average net returns <strong>of</strong> Rs.64650/ha with cultivation <strong>of</strong><br />
various agricultural and horticultural crops in NICRA adopted villages (Table 2). Net returns<br />
from rainfed groundnut cultivation increased from Rs.9171/ha to Rs.43163/ha due to<br />
availability <strong>of</strong> water for supplemental irrigation from checkdams or recharged<br />
borewells/openwells in vicinity <strong>of</strong> checkdams. Among the various crops grown curry leaf has<br />
recorded highest net returns (Rs.230000/ha) with a B:C ratio <strong>of</strong> 8.67 followed by jasmine<br />
(Rs.162500/ha, 3.60) and castor (Rs.94323/ha, 1.92).<br />
Conclusion<br />
Construction/renovation <strong>of</strong> check dams resulted in harvesting, storage <strong>of</strong> rain water, recharge<br />
<strong>of</strong> nearby open/bore wells. Timely availability <strong>of</strong> water for supplemental irrigation from these<br />
sources increased the cultivated area and income <strong>of</strong> rainfed farmers.<br />
References<br />
Bhargav, K. S. and Tank, U. N. 2011. Development <strong>of</strong> water resources at micro level through<br />
rain water harvesting. Agricultural Engineering Today 35(1): 16-19.<br />
Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance<br />
115 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Venkateswarlu, B. 2019. Water harvesting: A key strategy for climate change adaptation in<br />
rainfed agriculture. In proceedings <strong>of</strong> 13th International Conference on Development<br />
<strong>of</strong> Dryland Areas, February11-14, 2019, ICAR-CAZRI, Jodhpur. Pp.218-227.<br />
Improved Jhum in southern part <strong>of</strong> Mizoram<br />
H. Vanlalhmuliana, S. Sisi and Lalrinengi<br />
Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Siaha district, Mizoram -796901<br />
kvksaiha@gmail.com<br />
T1-45 P-1532<br />
In India, Jhumming is practiced mainly in the northeastern hilly region. Although it is both a<br />
labour intensive and land-extensive method <strong>of</strong> cultivation, it occupies a distinct place in the<br />
tribal economy and constitutes a vital part <strong>of</strong> the lifestyle and socio-economic set-up <strong>of</strong> hills.<br />
Traditional shifting cultivation also known as Jhum, has always been a major source <strong>of</strong><br />
livelihood for the farming community <strong>of</strong> Mizoram which consists <strong>of</strong> clearing <strong>of</strong> jungle by<br />
burning the vegetation and cultivating the plot <strong>of</strong> land for one or two years. These lands usually<br />
lie on the slopes <strong>of</strong> hills in thickly forested landscapes. A thick smog and haze eclipse the sun<br />
all through the day when jhum areas are burnt. Burning the felled trees helps release nutrients<br />
for farming. After this, the cultivated land is left fallow to regain the vegetation cover once the<br />
land loses fertility. Then, the jhum farmer shifts to another forest patch and returns to the same<br />
site for another cropping phase only after a few years. They also have a practice <strong>of</strong> bunding the<br />
fields using logs. The entire jhum system in Mizoram depends on the natural indicators and<br />
seasons that governs their stages <strong>of</strong> activities like selection <strong>of</strong> land, clearance <strong>of</strong> jungle,<br />
burning, sowing, harvesting etc. This method <strong>of</strong> cultivation is viewed as the first step in<br />
transition from food gathering and hunting to food production. It encompasses mixed cropping,<br />
viz., horticulture and annual cropping, perennial tree crops, animal husbandry and management<br />
<strong>of</strong> forest and fallows in sequential or rotational cycles.<br />
Methodology<br />
The On-farm trials was conducted during March 2022 - October 2022 at Tisopi village, Siaha<br />
district, Mizoram under NICRA project. The agroclimatic zone was humid subtropical hill zone<br />
and major soil type was red laterite and is slightly acidic in nature. The major climatic<br />
constrains <strong>of</strong> Tisopi was high drought prone area and high erodibility <strong>of</strong> soils and the average<br />
rainfall was 2030mm. The study comprised <strong>of</strong> three varieties <strong>of</strong> local rice viz., Saphuapa, Sasu<br />
kylyno and Idaw kylyno in traditional jhum field without maintaining spacing. In one jhum<br />
field, all the three varieties were grown side by side with and without logwood bunding. The<br />
size <strong>of</strong> the field for each variety is 1 acre and half <strong>of</strong> the field is under traditional jhum without<br />
logwood and another half was under logwood bunding. The data was recorded from such three<br />
jhum fields grown by three (3) different farmers in the same cluster. The data was carefully<br />
116 | Page Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
recorded from randomly selected plants from with and without logwood bunding for taking<br />
biometrical observations and yield calculation. In one hill 2-3 seeds was sown without seed<br />
treatment, nor the application <strong>of</strong> fertilizer or plant protection chemicals. Log wood bunding<br />
techniques involved keeping different sizes <strong>of</strong> log across the slope at a distance <strong>of</strong> 3-5 meters<br />
for soil and water conservation and those logs mainly comes from clearing the jungle for jhum<br />
field itself. The plant parameters like, plant height, number <strong>of</strong> tillers per hill, number <strong>of</strong><br />
effective tillers per square meter, panicle length, number <strong>of</strong> grains per panicle, test weight and<br />
grain yield.<br />
Results<br />
The growth and development parameters <strong>of</strong> rice viz., plant height, number <strong>of</strong> leaves per plant,<br />
flag leaf length, and number <strong>of</strong> tillers per hill under the logwood bunding method showed<br />
significant differences as compared to jhum field without logwood bunding as shown in the<br />
tables. These may be due to the fact that logwood bunding check the erosion <strong>of</strong> the topsoil and<br />
the decomposing weeds provided rich nutrients to the soil to enhance fertility for better growth<br />
and yield. The beneficial effect <strong>of</strong> logwood bunding method in enhancing the growth and yield<br />
over the traditional jhum method through increased height, leaves, number <strong>of</strong> tillers, leaf area<br />
ultimately reflected in higher yield attributing characters viz., number <strong>of</strong> panicles per hill,<br />
length <strong>of</strong> panicle, number <strong>of</strong> panicles, primary and secondary branch per panicles, number <strong>of</strong><br />
filled grains per panicle, weight <strong>of</strong> filled grains per panicle, test weight and ultimately the grain<br />
yield obtained from the plant as represented in the tables.<br />
Parameters <strong>of</strong> Rice crops variety Saphuapa, Sasu kylyno and Idaw kylyno under Normal<br />
Sl. No.<br />
Parameters <strong>of</strong> crop<br />
jhum without log-wood bunding<br />
Local rice variety<br />
Saphuapa Sasu kylyno Idaw<br />
kylyno<br />
1. Average plant height (cm) 138.00 158.00 134.00<br />
2. Average number <strong>of</strong> leaves per plant 5.00 4.00 4.00<br />
3. Average flag Leaf length (cm) 47.00 84.00 62.00<br />
4. Average number <strong>of</strong> panicles per plant 18.00 12.00 19.00<br />
5. Average number <strong>of</strong> grains per panicle 186.00 264.00 361.00<br />
6. Average panicle length (cm) 22.25 20.50 21.00<br />
7. Average primary branch per panicle 12.00 16.00 15.00<br />
8. Average secondary branch per panicle 38.00 41.00 45.00<br />
9. Average number <strong>of</strong> tillers per hill 21.00 27.00 24.00<br />
10. Average effective tiller per square meter 218.00 278.00 257.00<br />
11. Average filled grain per panicle 135.00 169.00 148.00<br />
12. Average grain yield (t/ha) 1.15 1.45 1.20<br />
Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance<br />
117 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
13. Average test weight 10.25 11.50 10.75<br />
14. Average length <strong>of</strong> the main root (cm) 8.50 7.00 11.00<br />
Parameters <strong>of</strong> the Rice crop variety Saphuapa, Sasu kylyno and Idaw kylyno under<br />
Sl. No.<br />
Parameters <strong>of</strong> crop<br />
improved jhum with log-wood bunding<br />
Local rice variety<br />
Saphuapa Sasu kylyno Idaw<br />
kylyno<br />
1. Average plant height (cm) 145.00 162.00 147.00<br />
2. Average number <strong>of</strong> leaves per plant 6.00 4.00 4.00<br />
3. Average flag Leaf length (cm) 59.00 87.00 69.00<br />
4. Average number <strong>of</strong> panicles per plant 21.00 15.00 20.00<br />
5. Average number <strong>of</strong> grains per panicle 215.00 298.00 369.00<br />
6. Average panicle length (cm) 23.00 22.50 23.00<br />
7. Average primary branch per panicle 13.00 18.00 16.00<br />
8. Average secondary branch per panicle 39.00 43.00 46.00<br />
9. Average number <strong>of</strong> tillers per hill 24.00 31.00 26.00<br />
10. Average effective tiller per square meter 229.00 285.00 262.00<br />
11. Average filled grain per panicle 139.00 177.00 152.00<br />
12. Average grain yield (t/ha) 1.45 1.95 1.60<br />
13. Average test weight 10.50 12.15 10.75<br />
14. Average length <strong>of</strong> the main root (cm) 10.50 8.25 11.00<br />
Conclusion<br />
As a result <strong>of</strong> implementation <strong>of</strong> improved jhum technique i.e logwood bunding method in<br />
cluster area <strong>of</strong> Tisopi village under NICRA project, local paddy production increased from 1.15<br />
-1.45t to 1.45 -1.95t per hectare. Owing to above result, it creates a good rapport between Krishi<br />
Vigyan Kendra (KVK) and Tisopi farmers. In addition. those farmers involved in the on-farm<br />
testing <strong>of</strong> logwood bunding method became a source <strong>of</strong> inspiration for fellow farmers <strong>of</strong> the<br />
area. The above data were from only one cropping season and need to repeat the trials to<br />
justified the findings in the future. Nonetheless, the farmers <strong>of</strong> Tisopi village were clearly<br />
motivated to take up logwood bunding measures in the sloppy land not only in paddy<br />
cultivation but for vegetables as well. They became aware on the importance <strong>of</strong> soil and water<br />
conservation in crop production and are ready to adopt Improved Jhum Technique in the<br />
coming season.<br />
118 | Page Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance<br />
T1-46 P-1533<br />
Development <strong>of</strong> Digital Weighing Type Lysimeter to Monitor Soil Water<br />
Balance Parameters<br />
Ajita Gupta * , R.K. Singh, and Mukesh Kumar<br />
ICAR-CIAE, Bhopal (M.P.)-462038<br />
*<br />
ajitagupta2012@gmail.com<br />
Enhancing water productivity (WP) <strong>of</strong> different crops by judicious irrigation scheduling is one<br />
<strong>of</strong> the major activities to ensure water saving in the agriculture sector. Scheduling the time and<br />
quantity <strong>of</strong> irrigation water application is primarily governed by crop evapotranspiration.<br />
Among various technologies, a lysimeter is generally used for direct measurement <strong>of</strong> crop<br />
evapotranspiration and water balance components. Various lysimeters have been installed by<br />
IMD in the agriculture stations <strong>of</strong> different climatic zones <strong>of</strong> India for the measurement <strong>of</strong> crop<br />
evapotranspiration. However, these lysimeters are bulky, manual, and need proper<br />
maintenance. Also available digital lysimeters are very complex and costly. Only very few<br />
studies have been executed in India for the development <strong>of</strong> weighing lysimeters with a digital<br />
measurement system, which is highly precise and accurate at a lower cost.<br />
Knowledge <strong>of</strong> crop evapotranspiration (ET) is important in modeling ET, crop growth<br />
simulation, scheduling irrigations, optimizing crop production, and irrigation project planning.<br />
The most accurate way to estimate crop water use and develop crop coefficients is with<br />
precision weighing lysimeters, which have generally been regarded as the standard against<br />
which other measures <strong>of</strong> ET are compared. A weighing-type lysimeter can measure the amount<br />
<strong>of</strong> water used in evaporation, transpiration, drainage, leaching, and other water-balancing<br />
parameters. However, high-precision lysimeters are very expensive and sophisticated. An<br />
inexpensive portable weighing lysimeter, which is very sensitive and precise, needs to be<br />
fabricated and put into the operations. This project is aimed at developing a weighing-type field<br />
lysimeter with digital output for developing judicious irrigation scheduling <strong>of</strong> different crops.<br />
Methodology<br />
An IoT-enabled digital weighing type field lysimeter was developed and tested at ICAR- CIAE,<br />
Bhopal. The lysimeter was designed as having an area <strong>of</strong> 1.38 m 2 , it was supported by a 1.5-<br />
ton single-point platform load cell. It was powered by two 5-watt solar panels and a 7 Ah<br />
battery for continuous power supply. The inner tank <strong>of</strong> the lysimeter was made in a cylindrical<br />
format with dimensions <strong>of</strong> 750 mm in height, and 450 mm in diameter using a 10-15 mm thick<br />
HDPE drum. To facilitate drainage, a 15 cm filter layer was added to the bottom <strong>of</strong> the lysimeter<br />
tank. The top <strong>of</strong> the tank was then filled with a 60 cm depth <strong>of</strong> soil. The drainage water was<br />
collected at the collector tank available at the bottom <strong>of</strong> the lysimeter. The collector tank was<br />
made using PVC pipe 110 mm in diameter and 45 cm in height. The depth <strong>of</strong> the water drained<br />
119 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
through the lysimeter was measured using a waterpro<strong>of</strong> ultrasonic sensor installed at the top <strong>of</strong><br />
the collector tank. The float switches and a 12-volt mini water pump have been used to empty<br />
the collector tank when water reaches a certain limit. Soil moisture sensors and soil temperature<br />
sensors (three each) were installed at 20 cm intervals from the top <strong>of</strong> the lysimeter. The<br />
developed lysimeter measures all the soil water balance components at an interval <strong>of</strong> 6 minutes.<br />
ESP8266 microcontroller board has been used to program the logic and also to establish WiFi<br />
connectivity. The controller has an LCD display (16×2) to check and examine the working <strong>of</strong><br />
the lysimeter onsite. The sensor data are stored both in the SD card onsite and on the cloud<br />
server using the IoT platform (ThingSpeak). For real-time data monitoring remotely, it<br />
incorporates a WiFi-connected digital display unit operated by a Raspberry Pi microcontroller<br />
board. Therefore, the developed lysimeter was found to be precise, and its measurements were<br />
satisfactory for the study <strong>of</strong> water balance parameters for irrigation scheduling.<br />
Results<br />
Developed lysimeter with sensors and power sources<br />
The developed lysimeter was calibrated to measure the accuracy <strong>of</strong> soil moisture sensors, soil<br />
temperature sensors, water depth sensors, and load cells. During the testing <strong>of</strong> the developed<br />
lysimeter, the data were recorded in the Thingspeak IoT platform. These sensors were<br />
calibrated using standard procedures. During testing, the lysimeter showed high linearity and<br />
no hysteresis. The least count/resolution <strong>of</strong> the developed lysimeter measurement was in the<br />
range <strong>of</strong> 0.1 and 0.25 mm <strong>of</strong> the depth <strong>of</strong> water. A total <strong>of</strong> 20 soil moisture samples <strong>of</strong> different<br />
soil moistures (completely dry to completely saturated) were prepared and the moisture content<br />
<strong>of</strong> these samples was calculated using the gravimetric method as well as using soil moisture<br />
sensors. The moisture sensors show high accuracy with an R 2 value <strong>of</strong> 0.98. A single-point<br />
platform load cell was used to measure the change in the weight <strong>of</strong> the lysimeter tank. The load<br />
120 | Page Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
cell was pre-calibrated. However, the accuracy <strong>of</strong> load cell measurement was measured using<br />
the known standard weight. A pre-calibrated ultrasonic sensor was placed at the top <strong>of</strong> the<br />
drainage tank. The sensor reads the depth <strong>of</strong> water drained through the lysimeter tank.<br />
Corresponding to each reading <strong>of</strong> the sensor, a scale reading was recorded. A calibration graph<br />
was drawn between the sensor reading and scale value, which shows a high R 2 value <strong>of</strong> 0.99.<br />
Conclusion<br />
Data <strong>of</strong> different sensors <strong>of</strong> lysimeter received on Thingspeak IoT platform<br />
Lysimeter studies will be a crucial tool for translating the outcomes <strong>of</strong> small-scale research into<br />
results applicable to a wider geographic area. Combining lysimeter research with direct<br />
measurements in the field or catchment, as well as modeling methodologies, allows for scenario<br />
Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance<br />
121 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
simulation <strong>of</strong> current climatic and hydrologic concerns (e.g. climate change, land management,<br />
groundwater recharge, etc.).<br />
T1-47 P-1574<br />
Popularization <strong>of</strong> Climate Smart Technology – Jalkund/Farm Pond for<br />
Crop Cultivation Post Monsoon Period<br />
Amrutha T., Azriel Mervin Tariang*, Arun K. Singha, and Rajumoni Bordoloi<br />
ICAR-ATARI, Zone-VII, Umiam<br />
Umroi Road, Umiam-793103, Meghalaya, INDIA<br />
* azrieltariang@gmail.com<br />
The preservation <strong>of</strong> moisture through water conservation structures like farm ponds and<br />
"Jalkunds" is one <strong>of</strong> the solutions that area farmers most frequently request. During monsoon,<br />
when rain is abundant, moisture or water is stored in these constructions to be used throughout<br />
the lean season, which is typically during the winter. Farmers used to be unable to cultivate<br />
crops during the winter months after harvesting paddy due to a lack <strong>of</strong> water. In addition, with<br />
the ongoing changes in rainfall patterns brought about by climate change the fields were<br />
typically left fallow. Some farmers find it burdensome because they are unable to cultivate the<br />
crop and earn more income throughout the season. For this reason, the majority <strong>of</strong> the farmers<br />
have sought assistance on this particular problem from various agricultural authorities. Since<br />
the project's inception, this specific intervention has benefited a number <strong>of</strong> farmers. According<br />
to the annual reports between 2015 and 2022, 211 farmers from the five states <strong>of</strong> Manipur,<br />
Meghalaya, Mizoram, Nagaland, and Tripura that are part <strong>of</strong> ICAR-ATARI, Zone-VII, have<br />
benefited from the ex-situ moisture conservation intervention. The total cropping area under<br />
Jalkund was 119.83 ha, compared to the area without Jalkund which 23.02 ha was only, which<br />
represents a 420.54% increase in cropping pattern over the period. Naturally, crops grown in<br />
places with irrigation from water storage systems resulted in higher yields than those grown<br />
without irrigation from such systems. To site an example, the average yield from the cultivation<br />
cabbage varieties viz., Green Magic, Wonder Ball, Green Hero, Rare Ball, and Blue Jays which<br />
were cultivated under the intervention to crops under farmer's practice was reported to be<br />
243.47 q/ha and 187.28 q/ha, respectively. This represents a yield increase <strong>of</strong> 30% over the<br />
farmer's practice. The average net return and the BC ratio from the intervention to the farmer's<br />
practice was reported to be Rs. 133878.75 and Rs. 60222.00 and 2.86 and 1.75 per hectare<br />
respectively. All Rabi crops grown with irrigation from farm ponds and jalkunds are following<br />
the same pattern. This establishes the significance <strong>of</strong> the moisture conservation initiative in the<br />
region. Moreover, it was reported that a number <strong>of</strong> capable farmers have chosen to construct<br />
their own water storage structures for agricultural and allied purposes. It will gain popularity<br />
over time and the KVKs spearheading the technology are urged to collaborate with other<br />
departments to reach more farmers throughout the many districts.<br />
122 | Page Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
T1-48 P-1582<br />
Land Configuration Management for Enhancing the Crop Productivity<br />
Sreedhar Chauhan and D . Mohan Das<br />
Agricultural Research Station, Adilabad, PJTSAU, Telangana<br />
There is a need for in-situ soil and water conservation and proper drainage technology in deep<br />
black soils <strong>of</strong> the Northern Telangana Zone <strong>of</strong> Telangana, as the receipt <strong>of</strong> annual rainfall is<br />
1050 mm leads to crop damage regularly during the grand crop growth period either due to<br />
excess or deficit rains. Land configuration techniques such as ridges and furrows and broad<br />
bed and furrow (BBF) can play a vital role to overcome soil-related problems by providing<br />
easy and uniform germination as well as good growth and development <strong>of</strong> plants (Ramesh et<br />
al., 2020). To tackle the abiotic problems, a field experiment is carried out at Agricultural<br />
Research Station, Adilabad (PJTSAU) during Kharif, 2018-19 to 2020-21 to study the<br />
performance <strong>of</strong> various land configurations concerning moisture conservation, the effect <strong>of</strong><br />
various land configurations on the growth and yield <strong>of</strong> various crops and cropping systems and<br />
the economics <strong>of</strong> various treatment combinations.<br />
Methodology<br />
Season: Kharif, 2018-19 to 2020-21; Soil type: BC soil; Design: Strip-plot, No. <strong>of</strong> treatments:<br />
15; No. <strong>of</strong> replication: 03; Varieties: Soybean - Basara; Redgram-PRG 176 (Ujwala) & Cotton-<br />
RCH-659 (BG-II hybrid); Spacings: Soybean-45 x 10 cm; Redgram-3.15/3.6 m x 0.20 m &<br />
Cotton-90 x 60 cm; Method <strong>of</strong> sowing: Dibbling <strong>of</strong> single seed per spot at a uniform depth <strong>of</strong><br />
3-5 cm; RDF: PJTSAU recommendations. The treatments consisted <strong>of</strong> 3 main plots (Land<br />
configuration practices; L 1 - Flatbed system; L 2 - BBF system & L 3 - Ridges & furrow system)<br />
and 5 Subplots (Cropping sequences; C1 – Soybean – Chickpea; C 2 – Soybean – Rabi sorghum;<br />
C 3 – Soybean – Safflower; C 4 – Soybean + Pigeonpea (7:1) & C 5 – Cotton + Pigeonpea (4:1).<br />
Results<br />
Among the three land configuration practices (BBF, ridge & furrow, and traditional method <strong>of</strong><br />
cultivation), crops sown on the BBF method recorded higher soybean seed equivalent yield<br />
(4786 kg ha -1 ) followed by ridge & furrow method <strong>of</strong> sowing (4121 kg ha -1 ) and flatbed<br />
methods (3670 kg ha -1 ). BBF method facilitated proper drainage in heavy rainfall periods as<br />
well as moisture conservation during drought situations and recorded 5.5 kg/ha-mm RUE.<br />
Similarly, among the different cropping sequences tested (soybean-chickpea, soybean-rabi<br />
jowar, soybean–safflower, soybean + pigeonpea, cotton + pigeonpea), the traditional<br />
intercropping system, cotton + pigeonpea (4:1) was found to be superior (4427 kg ha -1 <strong>of</strong><br />
soybean SEY) and found at par with soybean-chickpea sequence crop (4307 kg ha -1 SEY).<br />
However, Soybean-rabi jowar/safflower (or) soybean + pigeonpea (7:1) recorded lower values<br />
Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance<br />
123 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
viz., 3757, 3792, and 3716 kg ha -1 soybean SEY, respectively. Interaction effect between the<br />
land configuration practices and cropping sequences, no significant effect was observed on<br />
yield attributes, yield, and economics <strong>of</strong> either cotton or soybean intercropped with pigeonpea<br />
or soybean-based various crop sequences.<br />
Conclusion<br />
BBF method <strong>of</strong> cultivation is found to be superior to ridge and furrow method or traditional<br />
flatbed method <strong>of</strong> soybean cultivation. In Dryland agriculture or rainfed situations, based on<br />
soil moisture regimes, cultivation <strong>of</strong> intercrops or sequence crops are always better than sole<br />
crops by making use <strong>of</strong> proper land configuration practices like BBF or ridge & furrow<br />
methods.<br />
References<br />
Ramesh T, Rathika S, Nagarajan G and Shanmugapriya P, 2020. Land configuration and<br />
nitrogen management for enhancing the crop productivity: A review. The Pharma<br />
Innovation Journal 9(7): 222-230.<br />
Response <strong>of</strong> land configurations under various cropping sequences under rainfed conditions<br />
(Kharif, rabi/summer, 2018-19 to 2020-21)<br />
Treatments<br />
Main plots: 03 (Land configuration methods)<br />
Main (+)<br />
Inter crops<br />
MCEY (kg/ha) (Soybean)<br />
Sequence<br />
crops<br />
Total<br />
L 1 : BBF System 3520 1266 4786<br />
L 2: Ridges & Furrow System 2985 1136 4121<br />
L 3: Flat bed System 2652 1018 3670<br />
Sub plots: 05 (Cropping sequences)<br />
S. em+ 121.3 121.3 119.6<br />
CD (at 5%) 320.2 320.2 297.8<br />
C 1: Soybean – Chickpea 2477 1830 4307<br />
C 2: Soybean – Rabi Jowar 2264 1492 3757<br />
C 3: Soybean – Safflower 2262 1530 3792<br />
C 4: Soybean + Redgram (7:1) 3716 0.0 3716<br />
C 5: Cotton + Redgram (4:1) 4427 0.0 4427<br />
S. em+ 129.3 96.3 112.6<br />
CD (at 5%) 389.3 208.6 304.2<br />
Interaction<br />
S. em+ 230.8 230.8 177.6<br />
CD (at 5%) NS NS NS<br />
124 | Page Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
T1-49 P-1281<br />
Impact and Effectiveness <strong>of</strong> Rainwater Management Activities and Water<br />
Utilization for Rainfed Crops in the Semi-arid Region -A Case Study<br />
S. Vijayakumar, K.V. Rao, Manoranjan Kumar, R. Rejani, A.S. Dhimate, D.B.V.<br />
Ramana and V.K. Singh<br />
ICAR-Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture (CRIDA), Hyderabad -500 059, Telangana<br />
Soil and water are the two important critical inputs in dryland agriculture. The land is fixed in<br />
supply, which cannot multiply but can be managed properly for optimum utilization. Water is<br />
another scarce input owing to erratic and poor distribution <strong>of</strong> rainfall, which limits the<br />
production <strong>of</strong> crops. In this direction, there is a need to emphasize the conservation <strong>of</strong> these<br />
limited resources with appropriate practices. Harvesting and recycling rainwater in dry lands<br />
is important to improve water use efficiency (Shankar and Shivakumar, 2005). Rainwater<br />
harvesting structures are used for collecting and storing run<strong>of</strong>f water. The construction <strong>of</strong><br />
percolation tanks allows infiltration <strong>of</strong> the storage water through the topsoil to percolate deep<br />
to join the groundwater storage.<br />
Methodology<br />
To review the interest <strong>of</strong> farmers in the community approach to manage water resources, PRA<br />
was conducted in the village. Water scarcity and uneven and insufficient rainfall distribution<br />
are the major problems prioritized by the farmers in the watershed. Transact walk was<br />
conducted to identify the points for the construction <strong>of</strong> different rainwater harvesting structures<br />
displayed as physiographic <strong>of</strong> the Cluster villages in Rangareddy district Telangana State.<br />
Among the existing open wells (average depth 15-20 m) some <strong>of</strong> the wells shave dried up since<br />
2008 due to the indiscriminate drilling <strong>of</strong> bore wells. Further, the failure rate <strong>of</strong> the bore wells<br />
commissioned since 2014 was three for every successful bore well and resulting in increasing<br />
the financial liability <strong>of</strong> the farmer. The key activities taken up in the watershed area are given<br />
below:<br />
Renovation <strong>of</strong> traditional water bodies: Desilting activity involves the removal <strong>of</strong> silt from<br />
the water body using human labor. Farmers are encouraged to collect the silt and apply it to<br />
crop fields to improve soil fertility.<br />
Land development: The activities involve land leveling, bunding and terracing, which have<br />
been implemented on fallow or marginal croplands <strong>of</strong> scheduled caste and scheduled tribe<br />
farmers. Those lands, which were not cropped earlier, due to the slope and degraded nature <strong>of</strong><br />
the land, are being brought under cultivation after the implementation <strong>of</strong> land development<br />
activities. Individual farmers levelled the fallow lands or wastelands, which were earlier not<br />
suitable for pr<strong>of</strong>itable crop cultivation.<br />
Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance<br />
125 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Artificial Recharge Intervention modules at adopted villages: The artificial recharge to<br />
groundwater aims at augmentation <strong>of</strong> groundwater reservoir by modifying the natural<br />
movement <strong>of</strong> surface water.<br />
Renovated rainwater harvesting structure<br />
Rainwater filled in the percolation tank<br />
A view <strong>of</strong> the rainwater harvesting structure in the watershed village<br />
Rainwater harvesting and its recycling /recharging <strong>of</strong> groundwater: Rainwater harvesting<br />
and recycling through farm ponds and restoration <strong>of</strong> old water harvesting structures in the<br />
village may be useful in rainfed areas. Percolation tanks and ponds may be tried for recharging<br />
<strong>of</strong> wells.<br />
Recharge <strong>of</strong> wells with rainwater: The groundwater is depleted year by year because <strong>of</strong> dense<br />
bore wells. These open wells may not be yielding enough water to meet the requirements <strong>of</strong><br />
farm operation during early monsoon. The percolated water from rainfall requires a few weeks<br />
time to bring the water level up or recharge the wells. Farmers cannot store run<strong>of</strong>f water<br />
separately in the field itself.<br />
Impacts measurability: The activities implemented in villages include those that provide<br />
benefits in the short as well as long term. Further, some <strong>of</strong> the impacts will be visible only in<br />
the long term.<br />
Results<br />
Ex-situ rainwater harvesting and efficient utilization: The importance <strong>of</strong> rainwater<br />
harvesting has increased in recent years due to the increased rainfall variability, heavy rains<br />
and depletion <strong>of</strong> groundwater levels. Surface-water storage structures can play a vital role in<br />
augmenting groundwater recharge, especially in semiarid and arid regions. Rainwater<br />
harvesting for recharge <strong>of</strong> wells and recycling through farm ponds, restoration <strong>of</strong> old rainwater<br />
harvesting structures in rainfed areas, and open/bore wells for recharging groundwater are<br />
taken up for enhancing farm-level water storage in drylands.<br />
Increased well Yield: Water yield/recuperation rate before and after interventions for different<br />
wells indicates that the recharge rate increased by around 22% before interventions, the wells<br />
126 | Page Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
went dry after 1 to 1.5 hrs pumping and got recuperation in 24-36 hrs. After implementation <strong>of</strong><br />
interventions, pumping could be done for 1-2 hrs before the well went dry and it took 18 to 24<br />
hrs to recuperate.<br />
On the basis <strong>of</strong> the data collected from the observation wells and the perception <strong>of</strong> farmers, it<br />
was found that the water levels rose to the tune <strong>of</strong> 2 to 6 meters in the surrounding area <strong>of</strong><br />
unlined farm ponds and 2 to 8 meters in the surrounding area <strong>of</strong> percolation tanks. A total <strong>of</strong><br />
30 wells (50%) were found to be partly <strong>of</strong> fully influenced by the water conservation measures<br />
in the watershed area. The data presented data clearly indicated that response was quick in<br />
showing its effect on recharge within 10 to 15 days <strong>of</strong> rainfall. Evaluation studies carried out<br />
on the functioning <strong>of</strong> the structures in the village have indicated that properly located, designed<br />
and constructed different structures can have estimated approximately an efficiency ranging<br />
from 78 to 91% with respect to recharge <strong>of</strong> groundwater, leaving the balance for seepage losses<br />
(from nil to 8%) and evaporation losses (up to 8%). It has increased irrigation area by 15% in<br />
watershed villages and farmers who have got farm pond or well are taking at least two assured<br />
crops in a year. Farmers risk bearing ability increased. The shift in vegetable cultivation is one<br />
strong indicator and it helps in the introduction <strong>of</strong> new crops i.e., fodder-based varieties,<br />
vegetable farming, etc.<br />
Conclusion<br />
The efforts <strong>of</strong> the structures were seen during the project as farmers reported satisfactory water<br />
levels in the wells. The area in rabi also indicates the effect <strong>of</strong> these structures despite a drought<br />
year (2011) (45% normal rainfall). Interventions have a very significant role in the areas <strong>of</strong><br />
resource conservation on the local needs and cropping pattern. Engineering interventions have<br />
a remarkable impact on improving the livelihoods <strong>of</strong> the villages, as they are shown to improve<br />
yield levels by 15% and reduced costs by 30% besides improving the timeliness <strong>of</strong> operations.<br />
Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance<br />
127 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
T1-50 P-1617<br />
Effect <strong>of</strong> In-Situ Moisture Conservation Practices on Productivity and Economics <strong>of</strong><br />
Maize Based Cropping System Under Rainfed Ecosystem <strong>of</strong> South Bihar<br />
M. K. Singh*, Vinod Kumar and Sunil Kumar<br />
1 BAC, Bihar Agricultural University, Sabour, Bhagalpur, 813210,<br />
2 KVK, Munger, Bihar Agricultural University, Sabour.<br />
* mahesh.agro@gmail.com<br />
Water is a critical natural resource and managing rainwater in situ is the key to sustaining<br />
rainfed farming. Moisture conservation holds the key for enhancing productivity and bridging<br />
the yield gaps. To meet the growing demands for food, the scope for further addition to area<br />
under agriculture is possible only through the proper utilization <strong>of</strong> agricultural land. Rainfed<br />
agriculture is mainly dependent on rainfall, especially in India, where the quantity and<br />
distribution <strong>of</strong> monsoon rain determine crop production. Soil water is the main limiting factor<br />
in the production <strong>of</strong> crops since food production in India largely depends on the action <strong>of</strong> the<br />
monsoon under dryland conditions (Choudhary et al. 2021). Different tillage practices are<br />
suitable for in-situ moisture conservation such viz, ridge and furrow system, <strong>of</strong>f-season tillage,<br />
zero tillage, raised bed, broad beds and furrows are pr<strong>of</strong>itable (Rejani et al., 2017 and Hariom<br />
et al., 2013). Conservation tillage techniques, which involve soil-surface crop residue<br />
management systems with minimum or no tillage (Kar et al. 2021) are widely accepted as<br />
sustainable crop management that reduces soil and water losses, restores organic matter,<br />
increases biodiversity and fertility in degraded agriculture soils (Novara et al. 2021). Rabi<br />
oilseed and pulses required less water and ensure better monetary returns.<br />
Methodology<br />
The field experiments were carried out at Dryland research station, Munger during the year<br />
2016-17 to 2019-20 to evaluate the different in-situ moisture conservation practices on<br />
productivity and economics <strong>of</strong> maize-based cropping system under rainfed ecosystem <strong>of</strong> South<br />
Bihar: The sandy-loam soil <strong>of</strong> the experimental field was low in organic carbon (0.26%),<br />
available N (182.5 kg/ha), and available P 2O 5 (19.5 kg/ha) and medium in K 2O (168.6 kg/ha)<br />
with pH value 6.8. The experiment was laid out in Split Plot Design and replicated thrice with<br />
three levels <strong>of</strong> moisture conservation viz. M 1 Flatbed, M 2 Ridge and Furrow, and M 3 Raised<br />
bed in the main plot, whereas, four levels <strong>of</strong> Cropping system viz, S1: Maize-Linseed, S2:<br />
Maize- Mustard, S 3: Maize- Lentil, S 4: Maize-Chickpea in subplots. Maize is sown in 1 st week<br />
<strong>of</strong> July whereas, rabi crops are sown 3 -10 th <strong>of</strong> October every year <strong>of</strong> the experimentation. A<br />
Fertilizer dose was applied as per the recommendation <strong>of</strong> the package and practices. The full<br />
dose <strong>of</strong> Phosphorus as di-ammonium phosphate (DAP) and potassium as murate <strong>of</strong> potash<br />
(MOP) was applied as basal on the day <strong>of</strong> sowing. The grain, stover, and biological yield were<br />
128 | Page Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
recorded as per treatments and expressed in q ha -1 . The economics was calculated as per<br />
standard procedures.<br />
Results<br />
Maize-rabi crops sown on raised bed produced significantly higher maize equivalent yield<br />
(93.13 q/ha), system return (Rs 123543/ha), and B: C ratio (2.34) over ridge and furrow sown<br />
and flatbed sown crop. Different tillage practices are suitable for in-situ moisture conservation<br />
such viz, ridge and furrow system, zero tillage, raised beds, broad beds are pr<strong>of</strong>itable (Rejani<br />
et al., 2017 and Hariom et al., 2013). Conservation tillage techniques, which involve soilsurface<br />
crop residue management systems with minimum or no tillage (Kar et al. 2021) are<br />
widely accepted as sustainable crop management that reduces soil and water losses, restores<br />
organic matter, increases biodiversity and fertility in degraded agriculture soils (Novara et al.<br />
2021).Maize–Mustard sequence sown on raised bed recorded significantly higher maize<br />
equivalent yield (102.10 q/ha), system return (Rs 135297), system B: C ratio (2.60), and system<br />
RWUE (13.32 kg/ha-mm) but found at par with Maize–Chickpea sequence sown on a raised<br />
bed. Similarly, Hariom et al., 2013. Reported that raised bed planting with residues is helpful<br />
for water stress management in addition to their other advantages. The surface soil moisture<br />
content at maize harvest was 7.87 and 6.67% higher in a Raised bed and Ridge & Furrow over<br />
a Flatbed whereas, subsurface moisture was 18.90 and 18.23% higher. Similarly, after the<br />
harvest <strong>of</strong> rabi crops surface soil moisture content was 15.87 and 9.64 % higher in the Raised<br />
bed and Ridge & Furrow over the Flatbed whereas subsurface moisture was 27.90 and 23.95<br />
% higher over the flatbed.<br />
Conclusion<br />
It may be concluded that the Maize–Mustard sequence sown on raised bed recorded<br />
significantly higher maize equivalent yield, system return, system B: C ratio, and system<br />
RWUE and retained higher soil moisture content.<br />
References<br />
Choudhary S., Pramanick B., Maitra S. and Kumar B. (2021) Tillage Practices for Enhancing<br />
Crop Productivity under Dryland Conditions, Just agriculture newsletter, 1:5.<br />
Hariom, Ansari M.A., and Rana K.S. (2013) Productivity and nutrient uptake <strong>of</strong> mustard<br />
influenced by land configuration and residual and directly applied nutrients in mustard<br />
under limited moisture conditions. Indian Journal <strong>of</strong> Agricultural Sciences 83 (9): 933-<br />
938.<br />
Kar, S., Pramanick, B., Brahmachari, K., Saha, G., Mahapatra, B.S., Saha, A. and Kumar, A.<br />
(2021) Exploring the best tillage option in rice based diversified cropping systems in<br />
alluvial soil <strong>of</strong> eastern India. Soil and Tillage Research, 205(104761): 1-10.<br />
Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance<br />
129 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Novara A., Cerda A., Barone E., and Gristina L. (2021) Cover crop management and water<br />
conservation in vineyard and olive orchards. Soil & Tillage Research, 208 (6):104896<br />
Rejani R., Rao K.V., Osman M., Chary G.R., Reddy K.S. and Asrao C.S. (2015). Location<br />
specific insitu soil and water sustainable management <strong>of</strong> drylands. Journal <strong>of</strong><br />
Agrometeorology 17 (1): 55-60<br />
Effect <strong>of</strong> Moisture conservation practices (Tillage) and cropping system on maize<br />
equivalent yield (q/ha) and System return (Mean data 2016-2020)<br />
Treatments<br />
Maize<br />
yield<br />
(q/ha)<br />
Rabi crop<br />
yield<br />
(q/ha)<br />
Moisture conservation Practices (Main plot)<br />
Maize<br />
equivalent<br />
yield (q/ha)<br />
System<br />
net return<br />
(Rs/ha)<br />
B: C<br />
ratio<br />
System<br />
RWUE<br />
kg/ha-mm<br />
Flat bed 39.98 7.80 65.19 87047 1.75 8.54<br />
Ridge and Furrow 57.63 9.31 88.32 117379 2.23 11.52<br />
Raised bed 61.45 9.57 93.13 123543 2.34 12.14<br />
S Em 0.68 0.09 0.71 1014 0.02 0.10<br />
CD (P=0.05) 2.66 0.36 2.79 3983 0.08 0.38<br />
Cropping System (Subplot)<br />
Maize-Linseed 53.12 6.46 70.52 93907 1.83 9.21<br />
Maize-Mustard 51.86 14.73 92.02 122153 2.39 12.02<br />
Maize- Lentil 53.13 6.87 78.68 104736 1.93 10.28<br />
Maize- Chick pea 53.97 7.51 87.64 116496 2.28 11.43<br />
S Em 0.54 0.10 0.68 958 0.02 0.09<br />
CD (P=0.05) 1.60 0.29 2.03 2847 0.06 0.27<br />
Interaction AxB AxB AxB AxB NS NS<br />
Interaction effect <strong>of</strong> Moisture conservation practices (Tillage) and cropping system on<br />
maize equivalent yield (q/ha) (mean 2016-2020)<br />
Treatments<br />
Maize-<br />
Linseed<br />
Maize-<br />
Mustard<br />
Maize-<br />
Lentil<br />
Maize- Chick<br />
pea<br />
Mean<br />
Flat bed 54.47 76.59 62.08 67.64 65.19<br />
Ridge &Furrow 77.01 97.38 84.25 94.65 88.32<br />
Raised bed 80.09 102.10 89.72 100.62 93.13<br />
Mean 70.52 92.02 78.68 87.64<br />
CD (P=0.05)<br />
S Em <br />
Factor A (MCP) 2.79 0.71<br />
Factor B (Cropping system) 2.03 0.68<br />
Factor(B) at same level <strong>of</strong> A 3.51 1.18<br />
Factor(A) at same level <strong>of</strong> B 4.09 1.25<br />
130 | Page Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Interaction effect <strong>of</strong> Moisture conservation practices (Tillage) and cropping system on<br />
system net return (Rs/ha) (mean 2016-2020)<br />
Treatments<br />
Maize-Linseed<br />
Maize-<br />
Mustard<br />
Maize- Lentil<br />
Maize-Chick<br />
pea<br />
Mean<br />
Flat bed 72883 101930 82999 90376 87047<br />
Ridge & Furrow 102537 129233 112038 125710 117379<br />
Raised bed 106303 135297 119172 133402 123543<br />
Mean 93907 122153 104736 116496<br />
Factor<br />
(MCP)<br />
A<br />
Factor<br />
(Cropping<br />
system)<br />
CD (P=0.05) 3983 1014<br />
2847 958<br />
4931 1660<br />
B<br />
Factor(B) at<br />
same level <strong>of</strong> A<br />
Factor(A)<br />
at same<br />
level <strong>of</strong> B<br />
5786 1759 S Em <br />
Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance<br />
T1-51 P-1383<br />
Evaluation <strong>of</strong> Cherry Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiformae)<br />
Cultivars under Hydroponics for Growth, Yield, and Quality Parameters<br />
Harendra Kumar*, Ankur Agarwal, Pradeep Kr. Yadav, Om Prakash, Basant Ballabh<br />
and Devkanta P. Singh<br />
Defence Institute <strong>of</strong> Bio Energy Research (DIBER), DRDO, Goraparao – 263 139<br />
Haldwani, Distt. Nainital, (Uttarakhand)<br />
*harendrahorti26@gmail.com<br />
Hydroponics system for vegetable crop production has shown tremendous potential for<br />
increasing crop productivity and improving quality. Globally, hydroponics technology has<br />
been accepted as sustainable technology to tackle all issues being reported in conventional<br />
agriculture system especially residual toxicity, water and nutrient loss and environmental<br />
issues. DIBER (DRDO) has been instrumental in standardizing the technology <strong>of</strong> hydroponics<br />
for various crop from snow bound hilly regions to Antarctica. In recent years, cherry tomato<br />
(Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme) has gained lot <strong>of</strong> importance due to higher<br />
antioxidant activity, higher yield and premium price in selected market. This experiment was<br />
conducted during 2021-22 at DIBER, DRDO, Haldwani, Nainital (Uttarakhand). The objective<br />
<strong>of</strong> this study was to evaluate the Performance <strong>of</strong> cherry tomato cultivars under hydroponics<br />
culture. The Nursery <strong>of</strong> tomato was raised in the portrays during the month <strong>of</strong> September 2021<br />
and 30 days old seedlings were transplanted. The results revealed that performance <strong>of</strong> cherry<br />
tomato cultivar Serina and Esterina differed significantly on growth, yield and quality<br />
131 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
attributing traits. The observations were recorded on plant height, number <strong>of</strong> fruit/clusters,<br />
number <strong>of</strong> clusters/plants, Number <strong>of</strong> branches/plant, fruit girth, fruit length, pericarp<br />
thickness, Total yield, Carbohydrate content, protein content, Vit. C (mg/100g.), Tannin<br />
content (mg/ 100 g.), phenol (mg/100 g), Flavonoid content (mg/100g.). Esterina cultivar<br />
exhibited the highest value for plant height (370 cm), number <strong>of</strong> fruit/ cluster (22), number <strong>of</strong><br />
cluster/plant (18.66), Total yield (4680.00g/plant), Tannin (7.49 mg/ 100 g.), Phenol (394.66<br />
mg/100 g), and Flavonoid content (4.91mg/100g.). Serina cultivar exhibited the highest value<br />
for Number <strong>of</strong> branch/plant (3.66), fruit girth (3.42 cm), fruit length (3.86 cm), pericarp<br />
thickness (4.16 mm), Carbohydrate (6.33 g/100g), protein (1.78 g/100g), Vit. C (18.68<br />
mg/100g.).<br />
T1-52 P-1307<br />
Impact Assessment <strong>of</strong> Farm Pond on Demand Scheme <strong>of</strong> Maharashtra<br />
S. Gireesh*, N.V.Kumbhare, R.N.Padaria, R.R. Burman, Pramod Kumar,<br />
Arpan Bhoumik and Shiv Prasad<br />
ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute<br />
* gireeagri@gmail.com<br />
Farm pond is considered as the best alternative for irrigation source for efficient rain water<br />
management to improve productivity and protect the natural resource base in rainfed region.<br />
Maharashtra falls under the medium to high water stress category in terms <strong>of</strong> water availability.<br />
Considering the situation, Maharashtra govt was launched programme called farm pond on<br />
demand (Magel Tyala Shettale) in 2016 to enhance the irrigation potential for the benefit <strong>of</strong> the<br />
farming community.<br />
Methodology<br />
The study was conducted in purposively selected Vidarbha and Marathwada region <strong>of</strong><br />
Maharashtra, considering major drought affected area. From each region two districts<br />
(Aurangabad & Jalna districts from Marathwada) and (Yavatmal & Buldhana districts from<br />
Vidarbha) were selected purposively. From each district two block and four villages were<br />
selected randomly. Twenty (20) respondents from each village including farm pond<br />
beneficiaries and non-beneficiaries were selected randomly. There were 80 respondents from<br />
one district. Hence, a total <strong>of</strong> 320 respondents from four districts were constituted the sample<br />
<strong>of</strong> the study.<br />
Results<br />
The study revealed that 100 per cent beneficiaries had large size farm pond, among only 5 per<br />
cent <strong>of</strong> the respondents constructed ponds as per govt. guidelines and harvesting water (5 %)<br />
from rain. Most <strong>of</strong> the respondents (72.50 %) farm ponds were 3 to 5 years old, and 70.63 per<br />
132 | Page Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
cent farm ponds had irrigation potential throughout the year with cultivated area <strong>of</strong> 2 to 3 ha.<br />
The state government exceeded its goal <strong>of</strong> building 1,35,257 farm ponds; the original goal was<br />
to build 1,12,311; Aurangabad and Amravati divisions met their goal and had the most farm<br />
ponds <strong>of</strong> any district in Maharashtra. The majority <strong>of</strong> beneficiaries (86.75 %) used farm pond<br />
water during rabi season, followed by summer season (70.63 %), adopted drip (68.75%) and<br />
sprinkler (18.75%) methods <strong>of</strong> irrigation for horticulture crops, and used sprinkler (51.25%)<br />
and manual (28.75%) methods <strong>of</strong> irrigation for vegetables. Only 23.75 per cent <strong>of</strong> beneficiaries<br />
were aware <strong>of</strong> the critical stages <strong>of</strong> irrigation and the irrigation schedule (75.63%). A little over<br />
33.75 per cent <strong>of</strong> them adopted, and 15 per cent <strong>of</strong> them stopped fishing following adoption.<br />
Majority respondents (49.38%) were observed in medium level <strong>of</strong> sustainability followed by<br />
high (31.25%) and low (19.37%) level <strong>of</strong> sustainability, respectively. The value <strong>of</strong> enterprises<br />
cost effectiveness index (ECEI) <strong>of</strong> major crops increased from 17.27 to 48.83 among<br />
beneficiaries and cultivated land utilisation index (CLUI) was found significant (1% level) in<br />
all major crops except sorghum and pearl millet. The coarsened exact matching method was<br />
done to know impact <strong>of</strong> farm pond on beneficiaries, it is found that overall income i.e 16,946.4<br />
and HHI index (0.052) was found significant at 1 % level. The analysis <strong>of</strong> logit regression<br />
result revealed that variables like dairy animal, fishery, income, income log, percentage <strong>of</strong><br />
irrigation area and HHI were found significant at 1% level and it is also found that beneficiaries<br />
investing more in horticulture component (Mean±SD, 401) followed by animal component<br />
(Mean±SD, 360) and less in maintenance <strong>of</strong> farm pond (Mean±SD,136). The majority <strong>of</strong><br />
beneficiaries (56.88%) used farm pond income to buy input, followed by buying farm<br />
equipment (18.13%) and lending money to others (1.25%), with an overall shift in<br />
beneficiaries' means <strong>of</strong> subsistence reported at 84.09%.<br />
Beneficiaries' top three perceived obstacles were Government funding for the farm pond was<br />
not fully covered, and the farm pond's shorter lifespan or lower output were caused by the<br />
adoption <strong>of</strong> less durable building materials. Major challenges faced by the respondent included<br />
a lack <strong>of</strong> labour, inadequate family labour, a lack <strong>of</strong> owned resources, low rainfall, unusual<br />
weather, a high rate <strong>of</strong> evaporation, high costs for building and maintaining the ponds, and a<br />
lack <strong>of</strong> credit facilities. Major perceived factors for discontinued farm ponds included: Draining<br />
a bore well or well used to store water in a farm pond is followed by a reduction in the<br />
productivity or lifespan <strong>of</strong> the farm pond, an inadequate or low water harvest, an insufficient<br />
amount <strong>of</strong> family labour, Low and prolonged rainfall.<br />
Conclusion<br />
Given the importance <strong>of</strong> farm ponds, the government should concentrate on maintaining the<br />
programme and extending benefits to small and marginal farmers, as well as making changes<br />
to the way subsidies are provided. Also, strict guidelines need to be put in place to prevent<br />
groundwater extraction for storage in farm ponds.<br />
Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance<br />
133 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
T1-53 P-1503<br />
Impact <strong>of</strong> Soil and Water Conservation Interventions on The Livelihood <strong>of</strong><br />
Tribal Farmers from The Hilly Area <strong>of</strong> Palghar District<br />
Pavan Jadhav 1 , D. Divate Anuja 2 and M. Jadhav Vilas 2<br />
1 Deepak foundation, Mokhada<br />
2 Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Kosbad Hill, Palghar 401703<br />
Palghar is a tribal district <strong>of</strong> the Maharashtra state and has eight talukas having 1008 villages<br />
and household size is 5-6. The economy and livelihood <strong>of</strong> the tribal people <strong>of</strong> Palghar District,<br />
Maharashtra is primarily based on rainfed agriculture and forest. The various livelihood<br />
activities include agricultural cultivation wage labour (farm and non-farm labour), collection<br />
<strong>of</strong> minor forest products, fishing, liquor brewing and selling, job/service, and businesses. The<br />
land holding pattern <strong>of</strong> the community ranges from 0.05 to 1.0 ha while the yielding capacity<br />
<strong>of</strong> agricultural land is very low poor economic status <strong>of</strong> farmers in the hilly region due to lack<br />
<strong>of</strong> irrigation facility, more soil erosion, undulating topography, no proper use <strong>of</strong> modern<br />
technology, lack <strong>of</strong> knowledge about water and soil conservation etc. District receiving annual<br />
rainfall <strong>of</strong> about 3000 mm during monsoon still farmers face the shortage <strong>of</strong> water in rabi and<br />
summer season. Hence, Rabi cultivation is almost lacking as well as very little scope for the<br />
diversification <strong>of</strong> crops. Therefore, many young boys and girls even the adults have migrated<br />
to cities and out <strong>of</strong> state for work; they are forced to do unsociable activities. This large-scale<br />
migration has a negative impact on the family’s health and the children’s education which<br />
directly affect the livelihood standards <strong>of</strong> tribal families. Assessment <strong>of</strong> soil and water<br />
management in agriculture describes a large untapped potential for upgrading rainfed<br />
agriculture and calls for increased water investments in the sector (Molden et al., 2007;<br />
Rockström et al., 2007). Therefore, rainwater harvesting and the adoption <strong>of</strong> soil conservation<br />
measures solve the stated problems in some extent. The present paper/ study conducted on<br />
reviewing the Impact <strong>of</strong> soil and water conservation interventions on the livelihood <strong>of</strong> tribal<br />
farmers from the hilly area <strong>of</strong> the Palghar district.<br />
Methodology<br />
The present work was conducted from September 2018 to July 2022 in the Dhamani,<br />
Brahmangoan, Kalamgoan, Beriste, Ase, Karoli and Bavalpada villages <strong>of</strong> Mokhada tahsil <strong>of</strong><br />
Palghar district. The villages under the IVDP project were selected in consultation with District<br />
Administration based on the status <strong>of</strong> the migration, forest cover, crop productivity, the status<br />
<strong>of</strong> livelihood, health, education status, etc. A primary baseline survey <strong>of</strong> 1128 households were<br />
conducted in the selected villages through the questionaries to know the framer’s soicoeconomic<br />
condition. Defined soil and water conservation measures construction <strong>of</strong> CCT, farm<br />
ponds, cultivation <strong>of</strong> fruits crop on CCT, gravity-based drip irrigation system, recharging pit,<br />
134 | Page Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
ground water recharge <strong>of</strong> existing wells, and construction <strong>of</strong> new wells were implemented in<br />
the project area. After the successful implementation <strong>of</strong> interventions, interviews were<br />
conducted with farmers who applied soil and water conservation measure to assess the impact<br />
on crop productivity, environment, migration and employment generation household security,<br />
and socio-economic status.<br />
Results<br />
The selected villages have mainly two types <strong>of</strong> cropping patterns mainly cereal-pulses (Paddy-<br />
Finger millet- Little Millet- Udid- Tur) based cropping pattern and another is horticulture-based<br />
cropping pattern. Technological intervention for the cultivation <strong>of</strong> paddy and finger millet by<br />
SRI methods showed an improvement in crop productivity. The findings <strong>of</strong> the project showed<br />
that crop productivity <strong>of</strong> paddy and finger millet crops increased by 29 % and 19-20 %<br />
respectively. A total area <strong>of</strong> 566.5 ha <strong>of</strong> land comes under horticulture cultivation. After 4-5<br />
years cultivated fruit crops will start to produce fruits. Thereby, farmers will get a fixed income<br />
by selling fruits as well as providing nutritional security to farmers. Similar Findings were<br />
reported by (Gore, et al.2000, Ranade et al. 1995). The findings <strong>of</strong> the survey revealed that<br />
68.3% <strong>of</strong> the households migrated in search <strong>of</strong> employment either within the district (48.7%)<br />
or to other big cities (44.3%) like Mumbai & Nasik from the month <strong>of</strong> November to May. Soil<br />
and water conservation structures like CCT, farm pond, gravity-based drip irrigation system,<br />
jasmine cultivation etc resulted positive impact by creating employment generation at villages<br />
level. Through soil and water conservation measure interventions was able to mobilize more<br />
than 3000 human days <strong>of</strong> work to build across water conservation structures covering hundreds<br />
<strong>of</strong> acres <strong>of</strong> land. As a response, the people were incentivized with cash for their contribution to<br />
the initiative. Jasmine cultivation results more economical fulsheti model. It includes the<br />
cultivation <strong>of</strong> 220 jasmine plants on 500 sq. m (0.05 ha) <strong>of</strong> land, with an investment <strong>of</strong> Rs.<br />
3,000. Additional income <strong>of</strong> the some <strong>of</strong> the farmer has been raised by Rs. 30000 - 35000 per<br />
year by growing <strong>of</strong> jasmine using water <strong>of</strong> farm pond through gravity-based drip irrigation<br />
system. Hence the initiative was helpful in reducing migration up to 26% in all the 7 target<br />
villages.<br />
Soil and water conservation measures constructed under project indicated the increase in<br />
moisture content in soil/regime, ground water level. Also harvested rainwater can recycle for<br />
irrigation in rabi and summer seasons. Near about 12.77 lit water is conserved through CCT,<br />
farm ponds, recharge pit etc. It was found that water table <strong>of</strong> the open well was found increased<br />
by 0.5-1.0 m. The water retention period in the open well as well as in the nalas located at<br />
foothills was found to increase by 30-45 days during the observation period. To promote<br />
household food security a seasonal calendar <strong>of</strong> locally available vegetables was prepared and<br />
seed kits comprising seeds <strong>of</strong> location-specific seasonal vegetables from all three vegetable<br />
groups viz., green leafy vegetables, roots and tubers and other vegetables along with fruit<br />
Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance<br />
135 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
sampling were given to the families. Implementation <strong>of</strong> defined soil and water conservation<br />
deliverable in the field and garden <strong>of</strong> households showed positive benefits in terms <strong>of</strong> health<br />
by improving quality <strong>of</strong> diet. Migration for survival is another important factor that affect food<br />
security in the targeted area. Availability water in rabi season due to soil and water conservation<br />
measures results in employment generation through jasmine cultivation, vegetable cultivation<br />
etc and this intervention helps to stop the migration <strong>of</strong> households in some extent. Total 132<br />
Farmers adopting jasmine cultivation with use <strong>of</strong> drip irrigation system has raised additional<br />
income 30000-40000 per year and 450 farmers adopted fruit cultivation which will give<br />
additional income in the coming years. Farmers get additional one more crop and good yield<br />
with minimum resources. Increased income enables a better life in terms <strong>of</strong> better food, clothes,<br />
education, health etc. A number <strong>of</strong> capacity-building training programmes and demonstrations<br />
<strong>of</strong> soil and water conservation technologies brought awareness among the farming community<br />
for the conservation <strong>of</strong> soil and water resources and utilization <strong>of</strong> water for crop production<br />
and crop diversification. Adopted measures have helped in improving livelihood among the<br />
farming community <strong>of</strong> the region. Vegetable grown in their kitchen garden is improving their<br />
quality <strong>of</strong> life.<br />
Conclusion<br />
Small soil and water conservation structures and effective use <strong>of</strong> harvested water through micro<br />
irrigation systems at field level were found effective in improving productivity and crop<br />
diversification. It was evident from the work done under programme that the cultivation <strong>of</strong><br />
suitable crops/varieties by following improved management practices, jasmine cultivation<br />
could help to produce sufficient for feeding the family and additional income respectively. It<br />
resulted in an increase in the annual income <strong>of</strong> the farmers <strong>of</strong> the village. Also, the migration<br />
percentage <strong>of</strong> the people <strong>of</strong> the village in search <strong>of</strong> jobs was reduced. It was observed that there<br />
was an overall improvement in the livelihood status <strong>of</strong> farmers in the area. Hence it is also<br />
recommended that concerned agencies like Agriculture/Horticulture/Forestry line departments,<br />
NGO and private etc may take serious steps towards upscaling measures <strong>of</strong> soil and water<br />
conservation and the conservation <strong>of</strong> forests.<br />
The authors would like to thank to Dr, Jai Pawar Director Deepak Foundation or advisory<br />
support as and when required, during project implementation and Mr. Sunil Karale Assistant<br />
Vice President JM Financial Foundation for financial support under companies CSR Fund.<br />
References<br />
Gore, K. P., Pendke, M. S. and Jallawar, D. N. 2000. Impact assessment <strong>of</strong> soil and water<br />
conservation structure in Darakwadi watershed, Karnataka. J. agric. Sci., 13(3): 676-<br />
681.<br />
136 | Page Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Molden, D., Karen Frenken, Randolph Barker et al. 2007. Trends in water and agricultural<br />
development. In Water for food, water for life: A comprehensive assessment <strong>of</strong> water<br />
management in agriculture, ed. D. Molden, 56–89. London, UK: Earthscan; and<br />
Colombo, Sri Lanka: International Water Management Institute<br />
Monica Singh & Sandeep Deshmukh et.al.2022. Gender and livelihood analysis <strong>of</strong> the tribal<br />
farm families. The Pharma Innovation Journal 2022; SP-11(10): 1570-1573<br />
Ranade, D. H., Chourasia, M. C., Gupta, R. K., Upadhyay, M. S. and Nema, R. S. 1995. Integrated<br />
approach for increased agricultural productivity in dry land areas <strong>of</strong> vertisols. Indian J. Soil.<br />
Cons., 23 (1): 30-33<br />
Rockström, J., Louise Karlberg, S.P. Wani et al. 2010. Managing water in rainfed agriculture – The<br />
need for a paradigm shift. Agri Water Manag. 97:543–550.<br />
Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance<br />
T1-54P-1755<br />
Application Technologies for Harvested Rainwater in Ponds: Issues and<br />
Prospects<br />
M. Kumar, R. V. Adake, K. Sammi Reddy and V.K. Singh<br />
Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, Santoshnagar, Saidabad (PO), Hyderabad-500<br />
059<br />
Rainwater harvesting in farm ponds for supplemental irrigation are considered as an important<br />
strategy in present day dryland farming. These are promoted through various development<br />
programs as a drought pro<strong>of</strong>ing strategy. However, the lifting technologies for the shallow<br />
depth farm ponds are rarely discussed. The present paper takes the account <strong>of</strong> present status <strong>of</strong><br />
application technologies; describe different prevailing water lifting techniques used in different<br />
part <strong>of</strong> India, discuss issues associated with current water utilization techniques.<br />
Rainwater harvesting in farm ponds for supplemental irrigation is an important strategy for<br />
stabilizing yields <strong>of</strong> rainfed crops. Farm ponds are promoted in the integrated watershed<br />
programs and under MGNREGS as a drought pro<strong>of</strong>ing strategy. More recently, farm ponds<br />
are integrated with micro-irrigation programs under the National Horticulture Mission,<br />
particularly in states like Maharashtra and Andhra Pradesh. With continued over-exploitation<br />
<strong>of</strong> groundwater, it is important to use surface water harvested as surplus run<strong>of</strong>f in dug out<br />
ponds, either as standalone resource or in conjunction with groundwater for enhancing water<br />
productivity, particularly in arid and semi-arid regions.<br />
Water Harvesting and utilization in agriculture: Indian Experience<br />
In view <strong>of</strong> the agricultural scenario <strong>of</strong> Indian rural settings, there is a shift in paradigm from<br />
ground water recharge to small size surface water harvesting and recycling to agriculture to<br />
attain sufficient soil moisture for successful crop production. The intervention <strong>of</strong> water<br />
137 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
harvesting enables to increase the cropping intensity substantially and thus increase farm<br />
income. The average productivity <strong>of</strong> 1.0 t/ha <strong>of</strong> dryland agriculture could be doubled easily by<br />
providing 1 or 2 irrigation. The major impediments in realizing the potential <strong>of</strong> water<br />
harvesting and recycling in dryland agriculture is however, the economical and effective means<br />
to lift water and distribute the same at the field. The existing means <strong>of</strong> lifting pumps is grossly<br />
mismatched because its turns to be over designed in view <strong>of</strong> small size water harvesting ponds<br />
(usually <strong>of</strong> capacity up to 1000 m 3 ). Moreover, the lifting pump depends upon the supply <strong>of</strong><br />
either electricity or fossil fuels. Thus, the affordability <strong>of</strong> this means to the small and marginal<br />
farmers is a major concern. To avoid the economic liabilities associated with lifting pump and<br />
increase the pr<strong>of</strong>itability from limited land and climate resources, this class <strong>of</strong> farmers usually<br />
goes for hand watering <strong>of</strong> crop by fetching water as head load. This consumes lot <strong>of</strong> time along<br />
with physical labour. The present innovation is proved as the economical and efficient<br />
alternative to the water lifting and high-pressure requiring irrigation system. The present<br />
innovation is a perfect match between the water available and area under command can be<br />
extensively used for small scale vegetable production that improve quality <strong>of</strong> life by means <strong>of</strong><br />
providing food and nutritional security along with income generation.<br />
Issues associated to current water utilization techniques<br />
The wastage occurring through storage, conveyance and distribution ultimately result in<br />
delivery <strong>of</strong> 30 to 35 % <strong>of</strong> stored water for plant uptake (Patil 1988). The traditional flood or<br />
ridge and furrow method <strong>of</strong> irrigating field suffers from numerous problems such as<br />
considerable seepage (Moolman 1985, Hodgson et al 1990, Kahlown and Kemper 2004),<br />
conveyance and evaporation loss (Singh et al 2006); higher energy cost; lower water<br />
productivity; irrigation-induced soil erosion (Gomez et al 2004), and leaching <strong>of</strong> costly<br />
agricultural inputs causing sub-surface water pollution (Humphreys et al 1989). Moreover, this<br />
method is supply driven rather than crop-demand driven causing mismatch between need <strong>of</strong><br />
the crop and the quantity <strong>of</strong> water supplied. The decrease in the availability <strong>of</strong> water for<br />
agriculture, coupled with the requirement for the higher agricultural productivity, means that<br />
there is no option but to improve the water use efficiency. This has to include an efficient<br />
utilization <strong>of</strong> available water which otherwise would evaporate or percolate from the root zone<br />
<strong>of</strong> the soil.<br />
The recent advances in irrigation technology have made inroads in the cultivation <strong>of</strong> vegetables<br />
and horticultural crops. The frontier technology <strong>of</strong> micro-irrigation system not only provides<br />
higher water productivity but also minimize the problems associated with the traditional<br />
irrigation system. However, these irrigation systems work best with ground water and so its<br />
expansion concerns a lot. So there is a need to address the issue <strong>of</strong> suitable irrigation system<br />
for pond water. The issues are<br />
138 | Page Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Water lifting techniques: The difference between water lifting methods from bore well and<br />
open source lies in the fact that bore well requires minimum suction head <strong>of</strong> 40 m whereas<br />
open source pond require only 5 meters. The pump for pond water should have higher<br />
delivery/suction ratio to achieve higher system efficiency.<br />
Pump sizes: Suitable pump sizes are needed to develop by keeping in view that the capacity<br />
<strong>of</strong> farm pond barely crosses 2000 m 3 , and hence higher capacity pump will be brought<br />
mismatch causing low system efficiency and higher investment.<br />
Standardization <strong>of</strong> command area under farm pond: The experience suggests that farm pond<br />
<strong>of</strong> size 30m X 30 m X 3 will be able to provide adequate irrigation to 1 acre <strong>of</strong> land. Hence<br />
the pumping requirement would not be more than 1.5 hp. These needs to be standardize for<br />
different capacity <strong>of</strong> pond and respective command for optimal use efficiency.<br />
Selection <strong>of</strong> Crop: The selection <strong>of</strong> crop is highly crucial to achieve the water productivity<br />
and pr<strong>of</strong>itability.<br />
References<br />
Gómez R. Fernández, L. Mateos and J. V. Giráldez, 2004. “Furrow irrigation erosion and<br />
management”. Irri. Sci., Vol. 23 Number 3<br />
Hodgson A. S., G. A. Constable, G. R. Duddy and I. G. Daniells, 1990. “A comparison <strong>of</strong> drip and<br />
furrow irrigated cotton on a cracking clay soil”. Irri. Sci., Vol. 11 Number 3<br />
Humphreys E., F. M. Melhuish, W. A. Muirhead, R. J. G. White, J. Blackwell and P. M. Chalk,<br />
1989. “The growth and nitrogen economy <strong>of</strong> rice under sprinkler and flood irrigation in<br />
South East Australia”. Irri. Sci., Vol. 10, Number 4<br />
Kahlown, M.A. and W.D. Kemper, 2004. “Seepage losses as affected by condition and composition<br />
<strong>of</strong> channel bank”. Agric. Wat. Manage. Volume 65, Issue 2.<br />
Moolmam J. H., 1985. “The effect <strong>of</strong> a change in irrigation water quality on the salt load <strong>of</strong> the<br />
deep percolate <strong>of</strong> a saline sodic soil — a computer simulation study”. Irri. Sci., Vol. 6,<br />
Number 1<br />
Patil R. K., 1988. “Experiences <strong>of</strong> farmer participation in irrigation management: Mula command<br />
Maharashtra State”. India, Irri. and Drain. Sys., Vol. 2, Number 1<br />
Singh, R., J.G. Kroes, J.C. van Dam and R.A. Freddes, 2006. “Distributed ecohydrological<br />
modelling to evaluate the performance <strong>of</strong> irrigation system in Sirsa district, India: I. Current<br />
water management and its productivity”. Journal <strong>of</strong> Hydrology Volume 329, Issues 3-4<br />
Resilience through land and water management interventions, water management and governance<br />
139 | Page
Theme– 2<br />
Ecosystem based approaches for climate<br />
change adaptation, ecosystem services,<br />
integrated farming system models, Land<br />
degradation neutrality
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Theme – 2: Ecosystem-based approaches for climate change<br />
adaptation, ecosystem services, integrated farming system models,<br />
Land degradation neutrality<br />
List <strong>of</strong> <strong>Extended</strong> Summaries<br />
Sl. No Title First Author ID<br />
1 Diversification <strong>of</strong> crops and cropping systems<br />
resilience to climate variability in rainfed agroecosystems<br />
<strong>of</strong> Odisha<br />
2 Mainstreaming agro biodiversity – an integrated<br />
approach to improve nutrition, livelihoods,<br />
ecosystem services and reduce climate vulnerability<br />
3 Ecosystem based cropping system for climate<br />
change adaptation – An experience from Odisha<br />
Millets Mission<br />
4 Integrated Farming System Approach for<br />
Sustainable Development <strong>of</strong> Small and Marginal<br />
Farmers <strong>of</strong> India<br />
5 Enhancing System Productivity <strong>of</strong> Farmers through<br />
Rainfed Integrated Farming Systems in Shivalik<br />
Foothills <strong>of</strong> Punjab<br />
6 Livelihood sustainability <strong>of</strong> rainfed farmers: Impact<br />
<strong>of</strong> various fodder based cropping systems in rainfed<br />
regions <strong>of</strong> Telangana<br />
7 Quantification <strong>of</strong> ecosystem services from<br />
multifunctional agr<strong>of</strong>orestry established for family<br />
farming in Tamil Nadu<br />
8 Performance Evaluation <strong>of</strong> Ghungroo under<br />
Backyard Piggery Farming in South Garo Hills,<br />
Meghalaya - An Approach for Climate Change<br />
Adaptation.<br />
9 Documenting India’s Rainfed Mixed Indigenous<br />
Cropping Systems’ Features and Design<br />
SK Behera<br />
Jai C Rana<br />
Susanta Sekhar<br />
Chaudhury<br />
Ayesha Fatima<br />
Balwinder Singh<br />
Dhillon<br />
V Visha Kumari<br />
A Keerthika<br />
Rupam<br />
Bhattacharjya<br />
Prachi Patil<br />
T2-01O-1110<br />
T2-02O-1163<br />
T2-03O<br />
T2-04O<br />
T2-05R-1052<br />
T2-06R-1116<br />
T2-07R-1128<br />
T2-08R-1136<br />
T2-09R-1216<br />
10 Akkadi : A Sustainable Livelihood Cropping System<br />
in Raichur District <strong>of</strong> Karnataka<br />
11 Carbon sequestration as a major regulating<br />
ecosystem services from dryland agr<strong>of</strong>orestry<br />
systems<br />
12 Integrated farming for food and nutrition security <strong>of</strong><br />
small farmers besides making the system self-reliant<br />
13 Rainfed Integrated Farming System (RIFS) Model<br />
for Assured rainfall Zone <strong>of</strong> Marathwada Region<br />
14 Maize and blackgram strip-intercropping system for<br />
higher productivity and economics under rainfed<br />
Lokappa Nayak<br />
KB Sridhar<br />
B Bhargavi<br />
RS Raut<br />
Anil Khokhar<br />
T2-10R-1264<br />
T2-11R-1559<br />
T2-11aR-1591<br />
T2-12R-1626<br />
T2-13P-1036<br />
140 | Page<br />
Ecosystem based approaches for climate change adaptation, ecosystem services, integrated farming system models,<br />
Land degradation neutrality
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Sl. No Title First Author ID<br />
conditions<br />
15 Influence <strong>of</strong> crop geometry and plant growth<br />
regulators on production potential <strong>of</strong> Pigeon pea<br />
(Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.)<br />
16 Yield and Biological Efficiencies <strong>of</strong> Millet based<br />
Intercropping Systems under Dryland Conditions at<br />
Bastar Plateau Zone <strong>of</strong> Chhattisgarh<br />
SU Pawar<br />
Ashwani Kumar<br />
Thakur<br />
T2-14P-1073<br />
T2-15P-1112<br />
17 Effect <strong>of</strong> Mechanization Practices on Economics <strong>of</strong><br />
Soyabean-Safflower<br />
Cropping System<br />
18 Performance and adaptability <strong>of</strong> different improved<br />
variety <strong>of</strong> backyard poultry in Garhwa district <strong>of</strong><br />
Jharkhand<br />
19 Challenges in contemporary Indian agriculture:<br />
Integrated Farming Systems (IFS) for transformation<br />
20 Productivity and pr<strong>of</strong>itability <strong>of</strong> different rabi crops<br />
in maize based cropping systems under rainfed<br />
subtropics <strong>of</strong> Jammu<br />
21 Pr<strong>of</strong>itability <strong>of</strong> Rajmah based intercropping system<br />
under rainfed upland situation <strong>of</strong> Assam<br />
22 Effect <strong>of</strong> sowing windows on production <strong>of</strong> rabi<br />
sorghum (Sorghum bicolour L.) in scarcity zone <strong>of</strong><br />
Maharashtra.<br />
23 Effect <strong>of</strong> sowing windows on production <strong>of</strong> chickpea<br />
(Cicer arietinum L.) in scarcity zone <strong>of</strong> Maharashtra<br />
24 Effect <strong>of</strong> thermal environment on yield <strong>of</strong> tomato<br />
under different microclimatic conditions at Upper<br />
Brahmaputra Valley Zone <strong>of</strong> Assam<br />
25 Natural Resource Management in Rapeseed, Field<br />
pea and Lentil under Senapati District<br />
26 Assessment <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>itable intercropping system for<br />
Alfisols under dryland condition in Eastern Dry<br />
Zone <strong>of</strong> Karnataka<br />
27 Impact <strong>of</strong> Improved Practices in Rainfed Integrated<br />
Farming System on System Productivity and<br />
Employment Generation <strong>of</strong> Rainfed Farmers in<br />
Tumkuru District <strong>of</strong> Karnataka<br />
28 Livestock interventions as an additional source <strong>of</strong><br />
income to rainfed farmers <strong>of</strong> Ananthapuramu<br />
district, Andhra Pradesh<br />
29 Kadaknath poultry farming as an emerging way to<br />
increase farmer’s income in rainfed farming systems<br />
in Jhabua<br />
SA Shinde<br />
Sushma Lalita<br />
Baxla<br />
Marneni Divya<br />
Sree<br />
Rohit Shrama<br />
Nikhilesh Baruah<br />
Vijay<br />
VM Londhe<br />
A Kalia<br />
Dipin<br />
Wangkheimayum<br />
Mudalagiriyappa<br />
HS Latha<br />
K Madhavi<br />
Chandan Kumar<br />
T2-16P-1117<br />
T2-17P-1232<br />
T2-18P-1251<br />
T2-19P-1268<br />
T2-20P-1278<br />
T2-21P-1292<br />
T2-22P-1302<br />
T2-23P-1315<br />
T2-24P-1472<br />
T2-25P-1482<br />
T2-26P-1497<br />
T2-27P-1511<br />
T2-28P-1545<br />
Ecosystem based approaches for climate change adaptation, ecosystem services, integrated farming system<br />
models, Land degradation neutrality<br />
141 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Sl. No Title First Author ID<br />
30 Productivity and pr<strong>of</strong>itability <strong>of</strong> pigeon pea–<br />
vegetable mustard–okra cropping system as<br />
influenced by enriched organic formulations<br />
31 Deep liter Pig Housin- A venture for minimizing<br />
winter stress and other health managemental issues<br />
in piggery farming in West Jaintia Hill district <strong>of</strong><br />
Meghalaya<br />
32 Indigenous Multi Cropping Systems <strong>of</strong> Rainfed<br />
Areas: A Present<br />
33 A review article on comparative performance <strong>of</strong><br />
Vanaraja and Indigenous chicken under backyard<br />
system <strong>of</strong> rearing.<br />
34 Directed Seeded Rice: Prospects, Constraints and<br />
Researchable Issue<br />
35 Ecosystem-based adaptation for increased<br />
agricultural productivity through smallholder<br />
farmers in Ratlam District (M.P.)<br />
36 Effect <strong>of</strong> different legumes in legume-castor relay<br />
cropping system<br />
37 Effect <strong>of</strong> seeding rate on seed yield and yield<br />
components <strong>of</strong> alafalfa (medicago sativa) for<br />
minimizing abiotic stress.<br />
Kamal Garg<br />
Rimiki Suchiang<br />
Prachi D Pati<br />
Nunni Tayeng<br />
Satyendra Pal<br />
Singh<br />
Gyanendra<br />
Pratap Tiwari<br />
SP Deshmukh<br />
S Iqbal<br />
T2-29P-1550<br />
T2-30P-1570<br />
T2-31P<br />
T2-32P<br />
T2-33P<br />
T2-34P<br />
T2-35P<br />
T2-36P<br />
38 Impact <strong>of</strong> climate change on pokkali farming system PA Vikas T2-37P<br />
39 Impact <strong>of</strong> Front Line Demonstration on the Yield<br />
and Economics <strong>of</strong> Coriander under TDC-NICRA in<br />
Kota District <strong>of</strong> Rajasthan, India<br />
40 Impact <strong>of</strong> Onset date <strong>of</strong> monsoon on kharif crops in<br />
Bhadohi district <strong>of</strong> UP.<br />
41 Integrated Farming System module for strengthening<br />
traditional rainfed IFS for small and marginal farm<br />
holdings in Southern zone <strong>of</strong> Tamil Nadu<br />
42 Seasonal Growth Potential and Performance <strong>of</strong><br />
Ramie Fodder Crop (Boehmeria nivea) Under<br />
Extreme Climatic Conditions in North India<br />
43 Impact <strong>of</strong> adaptation technologies on resilience in<br />
drought prone regions <strong>of</strong> Maharashtra, India<br />
Dilip Matwa<br />
Sarvesh<br />
Baranwal<br />
G Guru<br />
Ashutosh<br />
JVNS Prasad<br />
T2-38P<br />
T2-39P<br />
T2-40P<br />
T2-41P<br />
T2-42P-1679<br />
142 | Page<br />
Ecosystem based approaches for climate change adaptation, ecosystem services, integrated farming system models,<br />
Land degradation neutrality
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
T2-01O-1110<br />
Diversification <strong>of</strong> Crops and Cropping Systems Resilience to Climate<br />
Variability in Rainfed AGRO-ecosystems <strong>of</strong> Odisha<br />
S. K. Behera 1* , M. R. Panda 1 andD. K. Bastia 2<br />
1 AICRP for Dryland Agriculture, Odisha University <strong>of</strong> Agriculture and Technology (OUAT), At/Po:<br />
Phulbani, Dist: Kandhamal, Odisha, Pin: 762001.<br />
2 Department <strong>of</strong> Agronomy, College <strong>of</strong> Agriculture, OUAT, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, Pin - 756001<br />
* subrat_behera@rediffmail.com<br />
Crop production in the rainfed lands in India is presently plagued with numerous problems<br />
like insufficient and erratic rainfall, land degradation and low soil fertility, poor supply <strong>of</strong><br />
agri-inputs, weak technology dissemination system, low investment capacity <strong>of</strong> farmers, etc.<br />
Uneven and erratic rainfall in the rainfed area also creates moisture stress conditions during<br />
critical growth stages <strong>of</strong> crop life, resulting in severe yield reduction. Even when the rainfall<br />
is high, it is <strong>of</strong>ten lost as run<strong>of</strong>f, when the surface <strong>of</strong> the soil is not suitably formed.<br />
Therefore, it is <strong>of</strong> utmost importance to enhance the resilience <strong>of</strong> rainfed agriculture to<br />
climate change through the introduction <strong>of</strong> improved varieties, planned adoption <strong>of</strong><br />
appropriate inter-cropping systems, and also with other management practices <strong>of</strong> natural<br />
resources. Keeping this in view, the present study was conducted to evaluate the response <strong>of</strong><br />
improved varieties and promising intercropping systems as well as different management<br />
practices such as in-situ moisture conservation, nutrient management, pest and disease<br />
management and weed management for different crops and cropping systems to climate<br />
vulnerability such as drought in rainfed agro-ecosystems <strong>of</strong> Odisha.<br />
Methodology<br />
The on-farm research was conducted at the villages such as Budhadani and Gunjidraga <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Kandhamal District <strong>of</strong> Odisha under the NICRA program <strong>of</strong> AICRP for Dryland Agriculture,<br />
Phulbani, Odisha during Kharif season <strong>of</strong> 2019-21. These two villages <strong>of</strong>ten experience<br />
scarce and erratic monsoon rainfall during Kharif season. The villages received rainfall <strong>of</strong><br />
1646.0 mm, 1957.0 mm and 1283.6 mm during Kharif season <strong>of</strong> 2019, 2020 and 2021 in 69,<br />
84 and 64 rainy days, respectively as against normal rainfall <strong>of</strong> 1407 mm with 65 rainy days.<br />
The total number <strong>of</strong> dry spells occurred during Kharif 2019, 2020 and 2021 were 2, 1 and 4<br />
respectively. The demonstrations were conducted on improved crop varieties such as Rice<br />
(var. Sahabhagi, Lalat), Maize (var. P-3501, NMH-51, OMH 14-27), Pigeon pea (var. NTL<br />
724), Cowpea (var. Gomti), Radish (var. Pusa Chetki), Tomato (var. Priya), Brinjal (var. Blue<br />
star), Bean (var. Raikia Local), Okra (var. JKOH 7315) and Watermelon (var. Black pearl).<br />
The demonstrations were also conducted on different intercropping systems such as maize +<br />
cowpea, maize + pigeonpea and pigeonpea + radish. The different management practices<br />
Ecosystem based approaches for climate change adaptation, ecosystem services, integrated farming system<br />
models, Land degradation neutrality<br />
143 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
such as in-situ moisture conservation, nutrient management, pest and disease management<br />
and weed management were also taken care <strong>of</strong> for these crops and cropping systems.<br />
Results<br />
In situ moisture conservation practices <strong>of</strong> summer ploughing and raising the bund height in<br />
rice, maize crops recorded a yield advantage <strong>of</strong> 20% higher over farmers’ practice. The<br />
improved varieties <strong>of</strong> rice i.e. Sahabhagi, Lalat and Naveen in Budhadani and Gunjidrga<br />
villages recorded significantly higher grain yield <strong>of</strong> 2510, 2520 and 2420 kg/ha, respectively<br />
compared to the traditional varieties (1850 kg/ha). Increases in yield <strong>of</strong> different rice variety<br />
were found to be 35.67%, 36.21% and 30.81% than the local variety (Saria, Jhalka, Punia),<br />
respectively. Hybrid maize such as P-3501 and NMH-51 produced 80.2 % and 76.5% higher<br />
yield respectively as compared to local variety (KujiMakka). Variety P – 3501 was largely<br />
preferred by the farmers because <strong>of</strong> its yield advantage, grain quality and large cob size that<br />
fetches more monetary return and market price. Introduction <strong>of</strong> maize + cowpea (2:2) and<br />
maize + pigeonpea (2:2) intercropping systems resulted in higher maize equivalent yield with<br />
yield advantages <strong>of</strong> 80.3% and 50.5% respectively as compared to sole maize crops. The<br />
introduction <strong>of</strong> pigeonpea + radish (2:2) intercropping system resulted in a higher pigeonpea<br />
equivalent yield with yield advantages <strong>of</strong> 84.6% as compared to sole pigeonpea crops.<br />
Intervention in integrated nutrient management (INM) such as the application <strong>of</strong> organic and<br />
inorganic fertilizer along with micronutrients was applied in the demonstration <strong>of</strong> sole maize<br />
and maize + cowpea (2:2) intercropping system. In weed management, pre-emergent<br />
application <strong>of</strong> Pendimethalin @ 5 ml/l <strong>of</strong> water at 2-3 DAS along with one-hand weeding was<br />
done during the crop growing period. These interventions <strong>of</strong> INM, weed, pest, and disease<br />
management increase the yield by 15.4% than the farmers’ practices. Improved varieties <strong>of</strong><br />
vegetable crops such as Tomato (var. Hybrid Priya), Brinjal (var. Blue star), Bean (var.<br />
Raikia bean), Okra (var. JKOH 7315),and Watermelon (var. Black pearl) resulted in higher<br />
yields than the farmer’s practice and net return <strong>of</strong> Rs. 1.0 to 1.2 Lakhs per hectare.<br />
Conclusions<br />
This study clearly indicated the advantage <strong>of</strong> adopting all improved rainfed agro technologies<br />
for different crops and systems in comparison to traditional practices. Assessment <strong>of</strong><br />
improved varieties <strong>of</strong> rice to climate vulnerability like the drought situation in Odisha<br />
indicated that the rice variety “Sahabhagi” is drought tolerant whereas varieties like Naveen<br />
and Lalat are also promising in the rainfed situation. Improved maize varieties such as NTL-<br />
30 and P-3501 are also promising varieties in the rainfed situation <strong>of</strong> Odisha. The In situ<br />
moisture conservation practices such as <strong>of</strong> both summer ploughing and increasing the bund<br />
height as well as INM, weed, pest, and disease management also proved superior in<br />
improving both soil and crop productivity and sustainability <strong>of</strong> dryland farmers.<br />
144 | Page<br />
Ecosystem based approaches for climate change adaptation, ecosystem services, integrated farming system models,<br />
Land degradation neutrality
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
T2-02O-1163<br />
Mainstreaming Agrobiodiversity – an Integrated Approach to Improve<br />
Nutrition, Livelihoods, Ecosystem Services and Reduce Climate<br />
Vulnerability<br />
Jai C Rana<br />
Rana, Alliance <strong>of</strong> Bioversity International and CIAT – India Office<br />
NASC Complex, Pusa, New Delhi – 110012<br />
In today’s complex and interconnected world, what we eat and how we produce it are<br />
inextricably bound together. With the global population expected to touch 9.7 billion by<br />
2050, there will be increasing pressure on our limited natural resources to produce more food,<br />
almost 50% more food, feed and bio-fuel than it did in 2012. Recent FAO report warns that<br />
the projected growth in world population is likely to be concentrated in sub-Saharan Africa<br />
and South Asia, with major concentration in India. This will pose immense problems, as<br />
expanding agriculture in India will be difficult because <strong>of</strong> scarcity <strong>of</strong> land and water<br />
resources. At present, there are worrying signs that yield growth is levelling <strong>of</strong>f for major<br />
crops. Hence, high-input, resource-intensive farming systems, which have caused massive<br />
deforestation, water scarcities, soil depletion and high levels <strong>of</strong> greenhouse gas emissions,<br />
cannot deliver sustainable food and agricultural production.<br />
The Sustainable Development Goals recognize that these challenges are interconnected and<br />
multidimensional. Under these challenges, achieving food security in drylands is more<br />
challenging. Drylands cover 41% <strong>of</strong> the earth’s land area and are home to 38% <strong>of</strong> the world’s<br />
population, the majority <strong>of</strong> whom live in poverty. With changing climates threatening fragile<br />
ecosystems and high migration levels, the livelihoods <strong>of</strong> more than 2 billion people are at<br />
risk. Farm households and rural communities around the world, including in dryland systems,<br />
have long since used agricultural and tree biodiversity to diversify their diets and their<br />
production systems, to manage pests, diseases and weather-related stress. The evidence<br />
shows that biodiversity-based approaches intensify production while reducing pressures on<br />
the environment, for example, by improving soil quality. At the same time, a diversified diet<br />
is essential for human health.<br />
Healthy dryland ecosystems and agrobiodiversity are essential for dryland communities to<br />
overcome their poverty. A major challenge is how to facilitate agricultural growth without<br />
endangering the resource base. About 800 million farmers in drylands depend on limited<br />
crops diversity <strong>of</strong> cereals, millets, legumes, and oilseeds. When food supplies are scarce,<br />
traditional plant varieties are <strong>of</strong>ten lifesavers as they are well adapted to drought, variable<br />
rainfall and harsh environments. The adaptive traits <strong>of</strong> dryland organisms are <strong>of</strong> growing<br />
importance for coping with the impacts <strong>of</strong> climate change and using traditional varieties in<br />
Ecosystem based approaches for climate change adaptation, ecosystem services, integrated farming system<br />
models, Land degradation neutrality<br />
145 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
production systems can increase the capacity <strong>of</strong> the system to adapt to unexpected or<br />
changing climate events, as they harbour higher levels <strong>of</strong> genetic diversity, and so are more<br />
able to respond to variation in their environment.<br />
Mainstreaming agrobiodiversity initiative led by Bioversity International and partners, is<br />
linking farmers to the seeds they need to face changing climatic conditions. This tricot-based<br />
crowd sourcing approach puts farmers in the role <strong>of</strong> citizen scientists, testing, observing and<br />
comparing different varieties, trying new farming techniques, and experimenting with<br />
different crop rotations to see what works for them. They evaluate different qualities <strong>of</strong> each<br />
variety such as yield, resilience, nutrition, taste and resistance to pests and diseases. The idea<br />
is to stimulate farmers to experiment with different landraces and varieties, while linking to<br />
geographical tools to make these efforts more targeted and more efficient. The approach also<br />
focus on strengthening local seed supply systems and the establishment <strong>of</strong> community<br />
genebanks, seed fairs, field evaluation trials (mother and baby trials that allow need based<br />
participatory selection), diversity fora and other adaptive technologies that enable farmers to<br />
benefit from diversity rich solutions. This also includes identification <strong>of</strong> suitable crop<br />
diversity to address such challenges, greater awareness and information on varietal adaptation<br />
based on scientifically sound evidence and its validation by farmers and communities. We<br />
have also develop successful value chains that improve farmers income and livelihoods<br />
through mainstreaming actions.<br />
T2-03O<br />
Ecosystem based Cropping System for Climate Change Adaptation – An<br />
Experience from Odisha Millets Mission<br />
Susanta Sekhar Chaudhury*, Biswa Sankar Das, Pulak Ranjan Nayak, Abhishek<br />
Pradhan, Bikash Das<br />
Programme manager (Research) Watershed Support Services Activities Network (WASSAN),<br />
Bhubaneswar, Odisha<br />
* sushantasekhar@rediffmail.com, susant@wassan.org<br />
Ecosystem-based approaches are becoming increasingly important as they can provide<br />
multiple benefits and are <strong>of</strong>ten considered cost-effective solutions as compared to<br />
technological approaches to tackling climate change. The underutilized cultivated species like<br />
millets, whose survival is dependent not only upon their resilience and adaptation but also on<br />
our own ability to recognize and promote sustainably their use in a context <strong>of</strong> changing<br />
markets, food trends and life styles. Out <strong>of</strong> an estimated portfolio <strong>of</strong> 30,000 edible plant<br />
species recorded worldwide, humankind depends upon just 12 crops for the bulk <strong>of</strong> its<br />
nutritional requirements. On the other hand, underutilized species (wild or cultivated), may<br />
hold as well as the key to future agro-ecosystem diversification and climate change<br />
146 | Page<br />
Ecosystem based approaches for climate change adaptation, ecosystem services, integrated farming system models,<br />
Land degradation neutrality
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
adaptation. Odisha Millets Mission (OMM) is a flagship programme implemented by<br />
Watershed Support Services and Activities Network (WASSAN) with the support <strong>of</strong> Director<br />
Agriculture & Food Production (DAFP), Government <strong>of</strong> Odisha and Nabakrushna<br />
Choudhury Centre for Development Studies (NCDS), Bhubaneswar to an aim reviving millet<br />
in farm and on plates.<br />
OMM work with large number <strong>of</strong> farming communities to increase millets productivity by<br />
optimal utilization <strong>of</strong> available bio-resources with farmers’ friendly technologies. It has not<br />
only looking after only increasing productivity <strong>of</strong> the millets but also focusing on in-situ, exsitu<br />
and community conservation and modifying traditional cropping system with improved<br />
package <strong>of</strong> practices. It has set up an Agro-ecological center where different crops and<br />
varieties are conserve, characterize and evaluate both by farming communities and<br />
researchers through different methods. Collaboration with State Seed Testing Laboratories<br />
(SSTL) to restore the valuable germplasm in a cryogenic system. It has also taken Crop<br />
Diversity Blocks (CDB) in each block for community conservation and evaluation to<br />
strengthen the community seed bank which serve any seed loss or scarcity due to natural<br />
calamities. Participatory approach followed to document indigenous knowledge and mapping<br />
<strong>of</strong> landraces <strong>of</strong> different crops which help to prepare strategies for climate mitigation in<br />
future. The paper will explain different agricultural approaches like Participatory Varietal<br />
Trial, Community Managed Seed System, Poly-culture, Crop Diversity Block etc, taken in an<br />
ecosystem for climatic change adaptation.<br />
T2-04O<br />
Integrated Farming System Approach for Sustainable Development <strong>of</strong><br />
Small and Marginal Farmers <strong>of</strong> India<br />
Ayesha Fatima 1 , Rajiv K. Singh 2 , P.K. Upadhyay 2 , S.S. Rathore 2 and Kapila<br />
Shekhawat 2<br />
1 Dr. Kalam Agricultural College, Kishanganj 855 107, Bihar<br />
2 Division <strong>of</strong> Agronomy, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi<br />
The world’s population is estimated to be 9.73 billion by 2050 as projected by the United<br />
Nations and to meet the demands <strong>of</strong> this burgeoning population, agriculture will need to<br />
produce almost 50 percent more food, feed and bi<strong>of</strong>uel than it did in 2012 (FAO, 2017).<br />
India, having population growth <strong>of</strong> 1%, the situation seems very alarming, particularly when<br />
the environment and soil health are deteriorating. Under this condition, there is a significant<br />
concern that how can we feed an expanding population without having harmful<br />
environmental and social repercussions? The potential answer to this question can be the<br />
adoption <strong>of</strong> location-specific, tailor-made integrated farming system (IFS) models depending<br />
on the existing resource base <strong>of</strong> the farmers. IFS represents integration <strong>of</strong> farm<br />
Ecosystem based approaches for climate change adaptation, ecosystem services, integrated farming system<br />
models, Land degradation neutrality<br />
147 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
enterprises/components such as cropping systems, animal husbandry, fisheries, forestry,<br />
duckery, poultry, sericulture etc. for optimal utilization <strong>of</strong> resources thereby it has the<br />
potential to significantly improve the economic status and livelihood <strong>of</strong> small and marginal<br />
farmers <strong>of</strong> India. In a nutshell, many <strong>of</strong> the emerging issues in modern agriculture, such as<br />
declining factor productivity, lowering production and pr<strong>of</strong>itability, increasing costs <strong>of</strong><br />
farming, inefficient resource use, hidden unemployment, and degradation <strong>of</strong> the natural<br />
resource base, are successfully addressed by the IFS's core characteristics.<br />
IFS for Environmental Sustainability: The deterioration <strong>of</strong> natural resources, buildup <strong>of</strong><br />
diseases and pests, and decline in factor productivity are just a few <strong>of</strong> the negative<br />
consequences <strong>of</strong> monoculture and continuous cropping, such as rice-wheat and rice-rice<br />
systems. All <strong>of</strong> this has endangered the sustainability <strong>of</strong> some <strong>of</strong> India's most productive<br />
regions. Environmental deterioration brought about by excessive use <strong>of</strong> high-energy inputs,<br />
such as fertilizers and pesticides, has been documented in many economically developed<br />
countries under the stress <strong>of</strong> intensive agriculture. Utilizing and recycling locally available<br />
inputs while integrating them with the minimum amounts <strong>of</strong> external inputs will improve the<br />
farm sustainability. In addition to being environmentally sustainable, using locally available<br />
inputs can help keep production costs within the reach <strong>of</strong> farmers. The role <strong>of</strong> indigenous<br />
technological wisdom in this process is significant. IFS is advantageous because <strong>of</strong> greater<br />
sustainability, diversification, intensification, productivity gains, and improvements to the<br />
utilization <strong>of</strong> natural resources.<br />
IFS for Improved Soil Health: Compared to cropping systems, integrated farming systems<br />
have several advantages. Applying livestock manure increases the amount <strong>of</strong> organic matter<br />
in the soil, which improves water infiltration, water holding capacity, and cation exchange<br />
capacity, all <strong>of</strong> which are mostly related to biological aeration. Manure and urine increase pH<br />
levels, which accelerate microbial activity and the decomposition <strong>of</strong> organic matter. With soil<br />
recuperation on a physical, chemical, and biological level, it helps to enhance and preserve<br />
the productive capacities <strong>of</strong> soils. Studies conducted under various IFS models across India<br />
have emphasized that recycling <strong>of</strong> livestock by-products such as FYM, poultry manure, etc.<br />
within the farm itself have led to improved soil physio-chemical properties. Solaiappan et al.<br />
(2007) reported that integration <strong>of</strong> poultry (20) + goat (4) + sheep (6) + dairy (1) along with<br />
conventional cropping system led to maximum organic carbon (0.35%), available soil N (134<br />
kgha -1 ), soil P (8.5 kgha -1 ) and soil K (378 kgha -1 ) at the end <strong>of</strong> experimental trial. Integration<br />
<strong>of</strong> rice-fish-duck system under coastal ecosystem has reported improved soil health due to<br />
effective nutrient recycling among different components.<br />
IFS for Risk Management in Agriculture: A single commodity-based agriculture is more<br />
vulnerable to climatic, biotic (pests and diseases) and economic (relative prices <strong>of</strong> input and<br />
output) changes compared to IFS. Adoption <strong>of</strong> IFS would help farmers escape such situations<br />
148 | Page<br />
Ecosystem based approaches for climate change adaptation, ecosystem services, integrated farming system models,<br />
Land degradation neutrality
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
and reduce the risk involved in the crop failure and it has been reported that IFS are <strong>of</strong>ten less<br />
risky than single enterprises-based production system. IFS enables farmers to strategically<br />
modify the allocation <strong>of</strong> inputs (land, water, and pasture) among and between enterprises in<br />
response to fluctuations in market and the climate. Under delayed monsoon onset conditions,<br />
anIFS comprising agri-horticulture, agri-pasture, silvi-pasture can provide sufficient fodder<br />
for 8 adult cattle along with milk and FYM.<br />
IFS for Higher System Productivity and Pr<strong>of</strong>itability: Analysis <strong>of</strong> IFS model at ICAR-IARI,<br />
New Delhi have revealed that simple integration <strong>of</strong> crop + dairy has the potential to enhance total<br />
system productivity as compared sole cropping. The increased productivity in the diversified IFS<br />
model may be ascribed to synergisms among the enterprises and the wastes or by-products from<br />
one enterprise used as inputs in other enterprise. In addition, simultaneous application <strong>of</strong> recycled<br />
pond silt, poultry manure, biogas slurry, nutrient rich pond water for irrigation and cow dung as<br />
FYM and vermicompost, nutrient enrichment through decomposition <strong>of</strong> stubbles and crop<br />
residues under different IFS enterprises provided congenial situation to increase the yield. When<br />
a fisheries unit was combined with a duckery unit, the fish production improved as well, owing to<br />
the fact that duck droppings served as a source <strong>of</strong> food for the fish. Crops applied with enriched<br />
pond silts having higher nutrients and integration <strong>of</strong> high value components like<br />
fish/poultry/duck/goat/cattle might contribute for better crop productivity. He also reported that<br />
the rice-wheat system had productivity <strong>of</strong> 7.25 tha -1 , cropping alone registered 9.21 tha -1 whereas<br />
higher productivity <strong>of</strong> 19.2 tha -1 was recorded in cropping + fish + poultry; 21.18 tha -1 in crop +<br />
fish + cattle and 21.20 tha -1 in crop + fish + duck + goat in Lower Gangetic Plains <strong>of</strong> Bihar.<br />
System productivity and net returns under different IFS models, mean <strong>of</strong> two years<br />
(2019-20 and 2020-21)<br />
IFS Model<br />
System productivity<br />
(t ha -1 )<br />
Net returns<br />
(× 10 3 ₹ ha -1 )<br />
Rice-wheat system 10.9 111<br />
Crop enterprise 24.4 129<br />
Crop + dairy 46.5 316<br />
Crop + dairy + fishery 51.4 344<br />
Crop + dairy + fishery + poultry 54.1 371<br />
Crop + dairy + fishery + poultry + duckery 56.8 392<br />
Crop + dairy + fishery + poultry + duckery + apiary 58.3 391<br />
Crop + dairy + fishery + poultry + duckery + apiary +<br />
boundary plantation<br />
Crop + dairy + fishery + poultry + duckery + apiary +<br />
boundary plantation + biogas unit<br />
Crop + dairy + fishery + poultry + duckery + apiary +<br />
boundary plantation + biogas unit + vermi-compost<br />
59.5 395<br />
59.9 399<br />
61.5 398<br />
Ecosystem based approaches for climate change adaptation, ecosystem services, integrated farming system<br />
models, Land degradation neutrality<br />
149 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
The enterprises such as dairy, fisheries, poultry, duckery, etc. were very remunerative on<br />
account <strong>of</strong> round the year availability <strong>of</strong> economic products having higher market demand<br />
and better market price <strong>of</strong> these commodities. Inclusion <strong>of</strong> more number <strong>of</strong> self-sustaining<br />
enterprises can become a key for improving the farm pr<strong>of</strong>itability <strong>of</strong> small and marginal<br />
holders. Thus, adoption <strong>of</strong> IFS can enhance net returns by 4.3 to 4.8 times than sole cropping.<br />
Apart from providing higher productivity and pr<strong>of</strong>itability, the diversified IFS model can<br />
provide round the year employment to the farm family along with food and nutritional<br />
security owing to the diverse group <strong>of</strong> outputs obtained from the system. The biogas unit<br />
integrated in the model meets the energy requirement for lighting and cooking purposes for<br />
the farm family. This model also provides beneficial ecosystem services with the integration<br />
<strong>of</strong> apiary and boundary plantation enterprises. The Apis mellifera aids in pollination <strong>of</strong><br />
different food and ornamental crops as well as trees apart from providing high value honey<br />
and complementary products such as beeswax, royal jelly, etc. The trees included in the<br />
boundary plantation prevent soil erosion and improves the landscape <strong>of</strong> the area. The<br />
ecologically oriented IFS model can stabilize the agriculture landscape and also enrich the<br />
biodiversity <strong>of</strong> the given area. IFS promotes a rich culture <strong>of</strong> biodiversity through<br />
maintaining a multi-enterprise system <strong>of</strong> flora and fauna.<br />
Conclusion<br />
Livelihood, food and nutritional security have been major concern <strong>of</strong> small and marginal<br />
farmers <strong>of</strong> India, which represent 86% <strong>of</strong> the farm families. Integrated farming system<br />
approach can serve to fulfill these concerns since it provides employment opportunities to the<br />
farm family round the year along with production <strong>of</strong> nutritious wholesome food. The<br />
integration <strong>of</strong> the enterprises should be done in a complementary way so that the by-products<br />
<strong>of</strong> one enterprise can be used effectively in another thereby enhancing the resource use<br />
efficiency and reducing dependence on purchased <strong>of</strong>f-farm inputs. The benefits <strong>of</strong> IFS are<br />
multifold ranging from sustainability, environmental safety, conservation <strong>of</strong> resource base to<br />
socio-economic prosperity <strong>of</strong> the small farm holders. There is a dire need to develop locationspecific<br />
farming system models keeping in view the available resources and managerial<br />
ability <strong>of</strong> the farmers.<br />
References<br />
FAO. 2017. The future <strong>of</strong> food and agriculture – Trends and challenges. Rome. ISBN 978-<br />
92-5- 109551-5.<br />
Solaiappan, U., Subramanian, V. and Maruthi, Sankar, G.R. 2007. Selection <strong>of</strong> suitable<br />
integrated farming system model for rainfed semi–arid vertic Inseptisols in Tamil<br />
Nadu. Indian J. Agron.,52(3): 194–7.<br />
150 | Page<br />
Ecosystem based approaches for climate change adaptation, ecosystem services, integrated farming system models,<br />
Land degradation neutrality
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
T2-05R-1052<br />
Enhancing System Productivity <strong>of</strong> Farmers through Rainfed Integrated<br />
Farming Systems in Shivalik Foot hills <strong>of</strong> Punjab<br />
Balwinder Singh Dhillon*, M. J. Singh, Anil Khokhar, Abrar Yousuf, Mohammad<br />
Amin Bhatand Parminder Singh Sandhu<br />
Punjab Agricultural University-Regional Research Station, AICRPDA Centre BallowalSaunkhri,<br />
Balachaur, Punjab 144521- India<br />
* dhillonbalwinder@pau.edu<br />
In Punjab, rainfed area lies in North-Eastern part in the form <strong>of</strong> 10 to 20 km wide strip known<br />
as 'Kandi' area. The area <strong>of</strong> region is approximately 3.93 lakh ha which comprises 7.8% <strong>of</strong><br />
total geographical area <strong>of</strong> the state. The crop production in rainfed area is mostly dependent<br />
on rainfall received during the monsoon season. The productivity <strong>of</strong> rainfed crops remains<br />
low which is attributed to erratic distribution <strong>of</strong> rainfall, intermittent dry spells during the<br />
crop season, delayed onset and early withdrawal <strong>of</strong> monsoon. Maize–wheat is the<br />
predominant cropping system in this region. Integrated farming system (IFS) approach has<br />
been widely advocated for improving productivity, pr<strong>of</strong>itability, livelihood and soil health<br />
under different agro-ecological settings <strong>of</strong> India (Sahoo et al. 2015; Balamati and Shamaraj<br />
2017).<br />
Improving the productivity <strong>of</strong> annual crops shall remain the focal point for improving the<br />
productivity <strong>of</strong> any farming system. The key elements for improvement <strong>of</strong> crop productivity<br />
envisaged for this region are: efficient rain water management, suitable tillage and sowing<br />
operations, selection <strong>of</strong> improved varieties, appropriate intercropping and crop rotation<br />
systems, efficient soil fertility management, proper plant protection measures and<br />
contingency crop planning. However, positive impact <strong>of</strong> these interventions on yield are more<br />
perceptible only in normal to mild drought years, causing reluctance <strong>of</strong> farmers to adopt these<br />
improved dryland farming technologies (Jodha et al 2012). But they are constrained mainly<br />
due to poor access to technical knowledge and critical inputs, long gestation period and high<br />
transaction cost <strong>of</strong> small marketable surplus. Due to small and scattered land holdings, the<br />
farmers in Shivalik foothills <strong>of</strong> Punjab have poor economic status. Integration <strong>of</strong> crops,<br />
animals and related subsidiary enterprises may enhance the net-income <strong>of</strong> the farm as a<br />
whole. Therefore, various rainfed integrated farming systems (RIFS)/models were established<br />
at farmers’ field under rainfedand partially irrigated conditions to compare the system<br />
productivity and economics <strong>of</strong> IFS models with maize-wheat cropping systems.<br />
Ecosystem based approaches for climate change adaptation, ecosystem services, integrated farming system<br />
models, Land degradation neutrality<br />
151 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Methodology<br />
Various rainfed integrated farming systems (RIFS)/models were established at farmers’ field<br />
in which integration <strong>of</strong> different components like pulses, oilseed, vegetables and fodder<br />
crops, fruits, animal, mushroom, vermicompost and sugarcane processing were taken into<br />
account. Total 24 farmers were taken, in both marginal and small category (3 in each<br />
category) under rainfed and partially irrigated conditions (12 in both farming<br />
situations).Various interventions like improved varieties <strong>of</strong> maize and wheat, introduced<br />
pulses (chickpea, lentil, moong, mash, soybean and arhar) and oilseeds (mustard-rapeseed,<br />
groundnut and sesame)crops, vermibags for vermicomposting, mushroom bags for mushroom<br />
production, seed <strong>of</strong> fodder crops, mineral mixture and uromin lick for strengthen the animal<br />
component, vegetable kits for kitchen gardening and training on sugarcane processing were<br />
given to the farmers and RIFS models were established under the flagship programme <strong>of</strong> onfarm<br />
rainfed integrated farming system research.<br />
Results<br />
System productivity <strong>of</strong> the marginal category farmers under Rainfed Integrated Farming<br />
System (RIFS) model was 9,664 kg per farming system (mean <strong>of</strong> 3 farmers), which was<br />
higher than traditional maize-wheat cropping system (4,671kg per farming system) in rainfed<br />
situations and RIFS model produced higher system productivity (10,985 kg per farming<br />
system) than maize-wheat cropping system (6,422kg per farming system) under partial<br />
irrigated conditions. Further, RIFS model for marginal category farmers resulted in additional<br />
net returns (Rs.99,922/-per farming system in rainfed conditions and Rs. 91,726/- per farming<br />
system in partial irrigated conditions) and additional employment generation (43 in rainfed<br />
situations and 47 man-days per year per farming system in partial irrigated conditions).<br />
Similarly, RIFS model for the small category farmers resulted in 21,996 kg per farming<br />
system in rainfed conditions and 18,446 kg per farming system in partial irrigated conditions,<br />
system productivity which was higher over maize-wheat (13,291 kg per farming system in<br />
rainfed situation and 12,678 kg per farming system in partial irrigated conditions. RIFS<br />
models for small category farmers recorded additional net returns (Rs. 1,74,998/- per farming<br />
system in rainfed conditions and Rs. 1,15,749/- per farming system in partial irrigated<br />
conditions) and additional employment generation (51 in rainfed situations and 94 man-days<br />
per year per farming system in partial irrigated conditions) than maize-wheat cropping<br />
system.<br />
Conclusion<br />
The study reveals that integration <strong>of</strong> dairy, mushroom, vermicomposting and sugarcane<br />
processing components with diversified crops through pulses, oilseeds and vegetables in<br />
152 | Page<br />
Ecosystem based approaches for climate change adaptation, ecosystem services, integrated farming system models,<br />
Land degradation neutrality
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
kandi region <strong>of</strong> Punjab is essential to <strong>of</strong>fset the ecological imbalances arising due to<br />
continuous cultivation <strong>of</strong> maize-wheat cropping system with local varieties.<br />
References<br />
Balamatti, A. and Shamaraj, H. 2017. Participatory evaluation <strong>of</strong> choice and combination <strong>of</strong><br />
enterprises for integrated farming system under dry-land and irrigated agro-ecosystems.<br />
Indian Journal <strong>of</strong> Agronomy 62(1): 8–15.<br />
Sahoo, H.K., Behera, B., Behera, U.K. and Das, T.K. 2015. Land productivity enhancement<br />
and soil health improvement in rainfed rice (Oryza sativa) farms <strong>of</strong> Odisha through<br />
integrated farming system. Indian Journal <strong>of</strong> Agronomy 60(4): 485–492.<br />
Jodha, N.S., Singh, N.P. and Bantilan, C.M.S. 2012. Enhancing farmers’ adaptation to<br />
climate change in arid and semiarid agriculture <strong>of</strong> India: Evidence from indigenous<br />
practices. Working Paper Series No. 32, ICRISAT, Patancheru, India,<br />
System productivity, net returns and employment generation <strong>of</strong> different categories<br />
Treatments<br />
Farming situation: Rainfed<br />
farmers under RIFS model in (Pooled data <strong>of</strong> 2 years)<br />
Category<br />
System<br />
productivity<br />
(kg/FS)<br />
Net returns<br />
(Rs/FS)<br />
Employment<br />
generation (mandays/season/FS)<br />
Integrated farming system Marginal 9,664 1,95,104 81<br />
Maize-wheat cropping system Marginal 4,671 95,182 38<br />
Integrated farming system Small 21,996 4,43,417 107<br />
Maize-wheat cropping system Small 13,291 2,68,419 56<br />
Farming situation: Partially irrigated<br />
Integrated farming system Marginal 10,985 2,22,543 87<br />
Maize-wheat cropping system Marginal 6,422 1,30,817 40<br />
Integrated farming system Small 18,446 3,72,405 147<br />
Maize-wheat cropping system Small 12,678 2,56,656 53<br />
FS; Farming system<br />
Ecosystem based approaches for climate change adaptation, ecosystem services, integrated farming system<br />
models, Land degradation neutrality<br />
153 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
T2-06R-1116<br />
Livelihood Sustainability <strong>of</strong> Rainfed Farmers: Impact <strong>of</strong> Various Fodder<br />
based Cropping Systems in Rainfed Regions <strong>of</strong> Telangana<br />
V. Visha Kumari, S.S. Balloli, K. Srinivas, D.B.V. Ramana V. Manoranjan Kumar, V.<br />
Maruthi, M. Prabhakar, M. Osman, A.K. Indoria. M. Manjunath, G. Ravindra Chary,<br />
Purabi Banerjee, S.K. Yadav and V. K. Singh<br />
ICAR-Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, Santoshnagar (P.O.), Hyderabad 500059<br />
In drylands, we have a restriction with very narrow sowing window apart from land<br />
degradation and poor productivity. Thus, to reduce the risk <strong>of</strong> crop failure and to have a<br />
sustainable farming, the farmers <strong>of</strong>ten prefer intercropping rather than single crop. However,<br />
at least for six months in a year there is no vegetal cover on cultivated soil. Even though dairy<br />
is an important component in dryland, availability <strong>of</strong> fodder from natural grasses or fodder<br />
crops are negligible. Growing perennial forage legume or grass viz., Desmanthus and Guinea<br />
grass with proved and existing promising cropping system <strong>of</strong> dryland is recommended. They<br />
grow fast and cover the land surface quickly even under low rainfall situations and provide<br />
considerable amount <strong>of</strong> green fodder. They can help in increasing the crop yield and resource<br />
use efficiency through their vegetation cover. The perennial system can also help in soil<br />
conservation and reducing water and soil run<strong>of</strong>f. It is possible to enhance the productivity <strong>of</strong><br />
the livestock by integrating fodder production into the farmers’ cropping systems. Thus, a<br />
project was initiated to explore options for integrating quality fodder production into exiting<br />
cropping systems <strong>of</strong> rainfed areas.<br />
Methodology<br />
The field experiment was conducted during 2015–2021 at Gungal Research Farm <strong>of</strong> ICAR-<br />
CRIDA (17°40' 40.4" N latitude and 78°39', 55.7” E longitude and at a mean sea level <strong>of</strong> 626<br />
m), Hyderabad, Telangana, India with seven cropping systems involving conventional crops<br />
either alone (100% area) or in combination with annual or perennial fodder species (50% area<br />
for crops, 50% for fodder species). The 7 treatments are: Sorghum + pigeonpea: desmanthus,<br />
sorghum + pigeonpea: guinea grass, castor: desmanthus, castor: guinea grass, sorghum:<br />
Fodder-clusterbean- Fodder-cowpea- Fodder-horsegram, Sole Sorghum and Sole pigeonpea.<br />
The standard crop management practices like uniform application <strong>of</strong> fertilizers, pest and<br />
disease management were followed.<br />
Results<br />
Results <strong>of</strong> seven-year long experiment revealed that sorghum + pigeonpea/guinea grass can<br />
produce on average 1350 kg <strong>of</strong> sorghum, 790 kg <strong>of</strong> pigeon pea from half hectare <strong>of</strong> land.<br />
Also, another half hectare can give 26500 kg <strong>of</strong> fresh fodder in 4-5 cuts. On the other hand,<br />
154 | Page<br />
Ecosystem based approaches for climate change adaptation, ecosystem services, integrated farming system models,<br />
Land degradation neutrality
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
sorghum+ pigeon pea-desmanthus can produce 16000 kg <strong>of</strong> fresh fodder apart from grain<br />
yield (Fig). A farmer with no animals would have more advantage with sorghum +<br />
pigeonpea/guinea grass as the system will yield more net returns. However, farmers with<br />
small ruminants could prefer sorghum+ pigeon pea-desmanthus, it was found to be the best<br />
fodder-based cropping system as it meets the dry matter, energy and protein requirement <strong>of</strong><br />
more growing lambs for longer period <strong>of</strong> rearing. These two systems are also better in<br />
providing green fodder for at least 8-9 months without any supplemental irrigation. Along<br />
with that, we observed less soil loss, water loss (40-48% less), sediment loss (50-58% less)<br />
and less pest and disease incidence in these systems due to diverse crops and higher number<br />
<strong>of</strong> natural predators.<br />
Conclusion<br />
Perennial fodder based cropping system can improve the livelihood <strong>of</strong> rainfed farmers by<br />
increasing the income from crop, livestock and fodder. These systems also improve the soil<br />
health and reduce the soil and water losses. Diversity <strong>of</strong> crops reduces the pest and disease<br />
incidence and thus helps in improving yield.<br />
kg/ha<br />
60000<br />
40000<br />
20000<br />
0<br />
6000<br />
4000<br />
2000<br />
0<br />
kg/ha<br />
Grain SEY<br />
FSEY<br />
Sorghum grain (SEY) and Fodder Sorghum (FSEY) Equivalent yield (Averaged over years)<br />
Ecosystem based approaches for climate change adaptation, ecosystem services, integrated farming system<br />
models, Land degradation neutrality<br />
155 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
T2-07R-1128<br />
Quantification <strong>of</strong> Ecosystem Services from Multifunctional Agr<strong>of</strong>orestry<br />
Established for Family Farming in Tamil Nadu<br />
A. Keerthika 1 , K.T. Parthiban 2 , A.K. Shukla 1 , R.S. Mehta 1 , M.B. Noor Mohamed 1 and<br />
Kamla K Choudhary 1<br />
1 ICAR-Central Arid Zone Research Institute, Regional Research Station, Pali Marwar, Rajasthan<br />
(RJ), India - 306 401<br />
2 Forest College and Research Institute, TNAU, Mettupalayam, India - 641 301<br />
lathikaconifers@gmail.com<br />
Agr<strong>of</strong>orestry has witnessed challenges and changes every decade in the form <strong>of</strong> technology<br />
and marketing interventions. Although agr<strong>of</strong>orestry is promoted for meeting food and<br />
nutritional security, it became the need <strong>of</strong> the hour to promote multifunctional agr<strong>of</strong>orestry<br />
with the main focus on small-scale farmers to provide income throughout the year. Moreover,<br />
this multifunctional agr<strong>of</strong>orestry has gained attraction recently because <strong>of</strong> nutritional and<br />
food security issues as committed in sustainable development goals (SDG).<br />
Methodology<br />
The experiment was carried out during 2018-2021 and is located at sylvan surroundings <strong>of</strong><br />
the foothills <strong>of</strong> the Nilgiris perched at an altitude <strong>of</strong> 300 m (11°19’33ꞌꞌ N, 76°56ꞌ16ꞌꞌE).<br />
Multifunctional agr<strong>of</strong>orestry model (MFA)’ was developed at Forest College and Research<br />
Institute, Mettupalayam, Tamil Nadu, India especially designed based on the concept <strong>of</strong><br />
family farming and more specifically for small farmers. The designed MFA model comprises<br />
<strong>of</strong> 25 tree species and 08 intercrops covering 0.75 acre. It is unique model designed in a<br />
circular shape which is delineated to provide separate importance to each circle viz., high<br />
valued tree circle, timber circle, plywood circle, medicinal plants, fruits circle and moringa<br />
circle. The entire multifunctional agr<strong>of</strong>orestry was divided into four equal quadrats. The<br />
spacing between each circle is <strong>of</strong> five meter and each quadrat has different intercrops.<br />
Quadrat I is <strong>of</strong> flower block (Jasminum grandiflorum, Jasminum <strong>of</strong>ficinale), quadrat II is <strong>of</strong><br />
vegetable bock (crop selection differs for kharif and rabi), quadrat III comprises curry leaf<br />
(Murraya koeingii) and Nerium oleander, quadrat IV is <strong>of</strong> fodder grass block i.e., Guinea<br />
grass (Megathyrsus maximus) and Desmanthus (Desmanthus virgatus).Under this<br />
multifunctional model, ecosystem services were quantifiedi.e.,1.Provisioning services (food,<br />
fodder, fruits, timber, medicinal plants): Quantification was done in Kilograms and local<br />
market price was used for economic valuation. 2. Regulating services (Carbon sequestration):<br />
Non-destructive method was used and the carbon price <strong>of</strong> $4 (Neya et al., 2020) was used to<br />
calculate carbon revenue. Supporting services (Butterflies): Diversity <strong>of</strong> butterflies was<br />
estimated using Pollard walk method (Pollard and Yates, 1993). 4. Cultural services: two sets<br />
156 | Page<br />
Ecosystem based approaches for climate change adaptation, ecosystem services, integrated farming system models,<br />
Land degradation neutrality
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
<strong>of</strong> questionnaire were prepared and the respondents were asked to answer. Willingness to pay<br />
(WTP) method was followed for economic valuation. The total economic valuation <strong>of</strong> all<br />
these services was also calculated.<br />
Results<br />
The results revealed that the provisioning services delivered multiple outputs (timber/wood,<br />
food, fodder, flowers, fruits, fodders, medicinal plants and tree borne oil seeds) and also the<br />
value <strong>of</strong> provisioning service was Rs. 355103.20. This type <strong>of</strong> multifunctional agr<strong>of</strong>orestry<br />
possessing diversified outputs (food/fruits) reduces the chances <strong>of</strong> total crop failure which is<br />
more common in monoculture. Multifunctional agr<strong>of</strong>orestry possessing high tree densities<br />
with a mixture <strong>of</strong> species can accumulate a significant amount <strong>of</strong> carbon which is evident<br />
from the current investigation. Significantly higher biomass and carbon stock followed the<br />
order <strong>of</strong> Neolamarckia cadamba>Melia dubia>Lagerstroemia lanceoalata>Dalbergia<br />
latifolia>Tectona grandis. The total change in soil organic carbon stock over three years<br />
(2018-2021) was 32.05 Mg ha -1 and 11.55 Mg quadrat -1 respectively. The carbon revenue<br />
estimated from carbon sequestration <strong>of</strong> vegetation and soil was Rs.2812 and Rs.12844.40<br />
respectively. Under supporting services, a total <strong>of</strong> 37 butterflies species were sighted during<br />
the entire study period belonging to three families viz., Nymphalidae, Pieridae and<br />
Papilionidae indicated the supporting services <strong>of</strong> multifunctional agr<strong>of</strong>orestry. Observations<br />
on the butterfly diversity provide information about the variations in the species richness and<br />
abundance shaped by the vegetation along the landscape (Öckinger and Smith, 2006) and the<br />
species interactions. Among different indicators <strong>of</strong> socio-cultural services, education and<br />
scientific knowledge ranked foremost followed by relaxation and walking. The willingness to<br />
pay depicted an average <strong>of</strong> Rs.33 per visit per respondent. The multiple linear regression<br />
analysis indicated that multifunctional agr<strong>of</strong>orestry is a good fit (R 2 = 0.79) for studying<br />
cultural services.<br />
Conclusion<br />
The study recommends promotion <strong>of</strong> this multifunctional agr<strong>of</strong>orestry model across different<br />
land-use system in the country to create sustainable income and employment generation<br />
activities particularly in small and marginal land-use system.<br />
References<br />
Pollard, E., and Yates, T. J. 1993. Monitoring Butterfies for Ecology and Conservation.<br />
Chapman & Hall, London<br />
Neya, T., Abunyewa, A. A., Neya, O., Zoungrana, B. J., Dimobe, K., Tiendrebeogo H. and<br />
Magistro, J. 2020. Carbon sequestration potential and marketable carbon value <strong>of</strong><br />
smallholder agr<strong>of</strong>orestry Parklands across climatic zones <strong>of</strong> Burkina Faso: Current<br />
Ecosystem based approaches for climate change adaptation, ecosystem services, integrated farming system<br />
models, Land degradation neutrality<br />
157 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Status and Way Forward for REDD+ Implementation. Environ. Manage., 65(2), 203–<br />
211.<br />
Öckinger, E. and Smith, H. G. 2006. "Landscape composition and habitat area affects<br />
S.No<br />
butterfly species richness in semi-natural grasslands." Oecologia, 149(3):526-534.<br />
Economic analysis <strong>of</strong> ecosystem services from multifunctional agr<strong>of</strong>orestry<br />
Ecosystem<br />
services<br />
1. Provisioning<br />
Service<br />
nature/category<br />
Timber<br />
Nature <strong>of</strong><br />
benefit<br />
Valuation<br />
method<br />
Economic valuation (Rs.)<br />
I year II year III year<br />
- 28446.00<br />
Food 27732.50 101305.00<br />
Fruits - 7180.00<br />
Flowers<br />
Direct Market price<br />
59000.40 117792.00<br />
Fodder - 4788.00 7865.00<br />
Medicinal plants - 692.00<br />
Tree borne oil<br />
seeds<br />
78.10 224.20<br />
2. Regulating Carbon stock Indirect Carbon price - - 15625.09<br />
3. Socio-cultural Recreation Indirect<br />
Willingness to<br />
- - 3465.00<br />
pay<br />
Gross value <strong>of</strong> ecosystem services (direct and indirect) - 91599 288946.11<br />
Total expenditure incurred towards multifunctional agr<strong>of</strong>orestry 310970.00 292360.00 267740.00<br />
Net value <strong>of</strong> ecosystem services from multifunctional agr<strong>of</strong>orestry 310970.00 200761.00 21206.11<br />
T2-08R-1136<br />
Performance Evaluation <strong>of</strong> Ghungroo under Backyard Piggery Farming in<br />
South Garo Hills, Meghalaya - An Approach for Climate Change<br />
Adaptation<br />
Rupam Bhattacharjya*, Athokpam Haribhushan, Tanya R Marak,<br />
BishorjitNingthoujam, Thongam Monika Devi and Amarjit Karam<br />
Krishi Vigyan Kendra, South Garo Hills, Chokpot, Meghalaya, CAU, Imphal<br />
*rpmbhatta@gmail.com<br />
Backyard piggery farming is a part <strong>of</strong> farming systems mainly run by women farmers in rural<br />
areas. Pig farming contributes an important role especially for the socio-economic<br />
development <strong>of</strong> the weaker section <strong>of</strong> the society in the state <strong>of</strong> Meghalaya. Pig performance<br />
and productivity <strong>of</strong> non-descript local pigs under prevailing smallholder traditional pig<br />
production system is very low and poor exploitation <strong>of</strong> production potential due to shortage<br />
<strong>of</strong> feed and feed crops and high cost <strong>of</strong> commercial pig feed. Therefore, Krishi Vigyan<br />
158 | Page<br />
Ecosystem based approaches for climate change adaptation, ecosystem services, integrated farming system models,<br />
Land degradation neutrality
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Kendra, South Garo Hills introduced Ghungroo, a breed <strong>of</strong> pig which is mostly black<br />
coloured with typical Bull dog face appearance. Breed is popular because <strong>of</strong> high prolificacy,<br />
good mothering ability, docile nature and ability to sustain in low inputs. The present<br />
investigation was carried out to evaluate the reproductive and growth performance <strong>of</strong><br />
Ghungroo and local pig raised under existing low input tribal backyard pig rearing system.<br />
Methodology<br />
The present study conducted in three villages namely Bibragre, Dobogre and Dagalgopgre <strong>of</strong><br />
Chokpot block in South Garo Hills district <strong>of</strong> Meghalaya. Forty farmers from the three<br />
villages were selected and each farmer was given one Ghungroo piglet for further breeding<br />
programme. Then from each farmer, one piglet (F1 generation) was collected and given to<br />
another forty farmers to reach out maximum beneficiaries. The selected villages were visited<br />
once a week by the investigator over a period <strong>of</strong> One year seven months from February 2021<br />
to September 2022. Data on sow reproductive performance and productive performance were<br />
collected by providing structured pre-tested schedule and discussion with the farmers and<br />
visual appraisal for evaluation and validation. Weight <strong>of</strong> different age group <strong>of</strong> pigs were<br />
measured by electronic weighing machine and body length (cm) and chest girth (cm) by<br />
measuring tape in order to give reference to the farmers so that later can estimate the weight<br />
<strong>of</strong> all the pigs more accurately. The information on existing pig production system such as<br />
rearing pattern, feeding, and breeding management and disease prevalence were monitored,<br />
and in addition piglet pre-weaning and post weaning mortality was recorded during visits<br />
Results<br />
Results obtained in this study were age at puberty; age at first conception, age at first<br />
farrowing and inter farrowing interval were statistically (P
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Inter farrowing interval (months) 6.6±0.15 a 8.4±0.11 b<br />
Farrowing rate (%) 81.5±1.02 a 76.3±0.32 b<br />
Average litter size at birth 9.3±0.47 a 4.5±0.22 b<br />
Average litter size at weaning 6.9±0.46 a 3.21±0.11 b<br />
Means with different superscript within a row are statistically significant (P
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Kadirvel, G., Kumaresan, A., Das, A., Bujarbaruah, K.M., Venkatasubramanian, V.,<br />
Ngachan, S.V. 2013. Artificial insemination <strong>of</strong> pigs reared under smallholder<br />
production system in northeastern India: success rate, genetic improvement, and<br />
monetary benefit. Trop. Ani. Health Prod. 45(2):679-686.<br />
Kumar, S., Singh, S.K., Singh, R.L., Sharma, B.D., Dubey, C.B. 1990. Effects <strong>of</strong> genetic and<br />
non-genetic factors on body weight, efficiency <strong>of</strong> feed utilization, reproductive<br />
performance and survivability in Landrace, desi and their halfbreds. Ind J. Animal Sci.<br />
60(10):1219-1223.<br />
Sellier P. 1976. The basis <strong>of</strong> crossbreeding in pigs: A review. Livestock Production<br />
Science.3(3):203-226.<br />
Sharma BD, Dubey CB, Singh SK. A comparative study <strong>of</strong> growth in pure and crossbred<br />
pigs. Ind. J. <strong>of</strong> Animal Sci. 1990; (4):492-495.<br />
T2-09R-1216<br />
Documenting India’s Rainfed Mixed Indigenous Cropping Systems’<br />
Features and Design<br />
Prachi Patil 1 , V. Swaran 1 , A. Ravindra 1 , Shailesh Vyas 2 , Soumik Banerjee 3 , Lokappa<br />
Nayak 4 , K. Phaneesh 5 , P. Vipindas 3 , Shamika Mone 3 , Tarak Kate 6 , Siddhesh Sakore 7 ,<br />
Pramel Kumar 8 , Ritesh Guage 9 , Luna Panda 10 , Deepak Sharma 11<br />
1 Watershed Support Services and Activities Network (WASSAN), Hyderabad - 500068, Telangana<br />
2 SATVIK - Promoting Ecological Farming, Kachchh, Gujarat, – 370023<br />
3 Independent researcher from Jharkhand and Kerala<br />
4 India Foundation for Humanistic Development, Bengaluru, Karnataka – 560025, India<br />
5 Revitalising Rainfed Agriculture Network (RRAN) Hyderabad, Telangana – 500068, India<br />
6 Dharamitra, Wardha, Maharashtra - 442 001, India<br />
7 AGRO RANGERS, Rajgurunagar, Maharashtra – 410505, India<br />
8 Green Foundation, Bengaluru, Karnataka – 560094, India<br />
9 Samaj Pragati Sahayog, Dewas, Madhya Pradesh– 455227, India<br />
10 Pragati Foundation, Gurugram, Haryana-122101, India<br />
11 Equality Empowerment Foundation, Udaipur, Rajasthan, India<br />
The current year, 2022, has so far exposed the vulnerabilities <strong>of</strong> wheat and rice - India’s two<br />
major cereal crops - and the conventional cropping system in which it is grown, to a changing<br />
climate (Khan 2022). Unprecedented heat waves affected the wheat cultivation leading to a<br />
ban on its export in May, whereas the drought situation in the Indo-Gangetic Plain (IGP)<br />
states has impacted paddy cultivation leading to a ban/tariff on its exports in September<br />
(Bhardwaj and Jadhav 2022). These recent experiences from the green revolution belts <strong>of</strong><br />
Punjab and IGP draws our attention to the rainfed agriculture areas.<br />
Ecosystem based approaches for climate change adaptation, ecosystem services, integrated farming system<br />
models, Land degradation neutrality<br />
161 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
In spite <strong>of</strong> about 68% <strong>of</strong> non-food and 48% <strong>of</strong> the food cropped area under rainfed agriculture<br />
this ecosystem has historically not garnered the public and public policy makers' imagination<br />
in India. And within the rainfed areas, multi-cropping systems i.e., “growing more than one<br />
crop on the same piece <strong>of</strong> land during one calendar year” are relatively underexplored by the<br />
National Agricultural Research System (Beets 1975). These systems present an alternative to<br />
the dominant green revolution paradigm <strong>of</strong> agriculture. This exploratory study was hence<br />
undertaken to understand the design and features <strong>of</strong> indigenous multi-cropping systems <strong>of</strong><br />
India.<br />
Methodology<br />
The first step <strong>of</strong> the study involved identification <strong>of</strong> cropping system that has features like<br />
multi-cropping, one time sowing with multiple harvests at multiple times, multi-tier canopy,<br />
extended period <strong>of</strong> soil cover, selection <strong>of</strong> specific phenotypes etc. A detailed documentation<br />
<strong>of</strong> the selected cropping system was carried out by the research partners viz. NGOs and<br />
independent researchers after its selection by an expert panel consisted <strong>of</strong> senior researchers<br />
from NARS and NGOs.<br />
Between February and March 2022, research partners documented the following information<br />
<strong>of</strong> each cropping systems: cropping pattern, crop calendar, layout <strong>of</strong> the field, crop-risk<br />
mapping, time trends, soil and dietary nutrient flows and resource mapping.<br />
Multiple research methods employed in the study for documenting the aforementioned<br />
features include review <strong>of</strong> literature, focus group discussions, key informant interviews,<br />
visual documentation <strong>of</strong> the cropping practices (where it is still in practice).The twelve<br />
cropping systems and their locations documented in this study.<br />
Mixed Indigenous Cropping Systems Documented in the Present Study<br />
162 | Page<br />
Ecosystem based approaches for climate change adaptation, ecosystem services, integrated farming system models,<br />
Land degradation neutrality
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Results<br />
Some common design principles <strong>of</strong> the cropping systems discerned during the workshop have<br />
implications for climate resilience. It includes the regular harvest <strong>of</strong> edible crops from its<br />
multi-tire mix <strong>of</strong> crops and its varieties viz. millets/cereals, pulses, oilseeds and vegetables,<br />
soil cover for seven to nine months, resource utilization complementarity between main crops<br />
and companion crops and use <strong>of</strong> border crops as windbreak and pest infestation barriers.<br />
Multiple harvesting <strong>of</strong> different crops from two to three months after sowing, gave food and<br />
nutrition security for the rainfed farmers along with stable source income. Inbuild resilience<br />
in the traditional multi cropping system reduced the risk <strong>of</strong> crop failure due to variability in<br />
rainfall and pest and disease infestation.<br />
Conclusion<br />
This study opens up region-specific traditional alternatives for mainstream cropping systems<br />
with climate resilience built into. These rainfed mixed-multi-cropping systems have potential<br />
applications in addressing existing crises in our agri-food systems, farmer livelihoods and<br />
could inform the practice and the public policy <strong>of</strong> rainfed area agriculture.<br />
References<br />
Bhardwaj, M. and Jadhav, R., 2022. India curbed rice exports after rise in shipments lifts<br />
local prices, Reuters. Thomson Reuters. Available at:<br />
https://www.reuters.com/markets/asia/india-restricted-rice-exports-rising-shipmentslift-local-prices-govt-<strong>of</strong>ficial-2022-09-09/<br />
(Accessed: September 20, 2022).<br />
Beets, W. C.,1975. Multiple-cropping practices in Asia and the Far East. Agric. and environ.<br />
2(3), 219-228.<br />
Khan, M.A., 2022. Monsoon 2022: Jharkhand farmers give up on Paddy Harvest due to<br />
scanty rains,Down To Earth. Available at: https://www.downtoearth.org.in<br />
/news/climate-change/monsoon-2022-jharkhand-farmers-give-up-on-paddy-harvestdue-to-scanty-rains-84498.<br />
Ecosystem based approaches for climate change adaptation, ecosystem services, integrated farming system<br />
models, Land degradation neutrality<br />
163 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
T2-10R-1264<br />
Akkadi: A Sustainable Livelihood Cropping System in Raichur District <strong>of</strong><br />
Karnataka<br />
Lokappa Nayak 1 , Prachi Patil 2 , Mallikarjun Patil 1 , V. Swaran 2<br />
1<br />
India Foundation for Humanistic Development, Bengaluru, Karnataka, 560025, 2 Watershed<br />
Support Services and Activities Network, Hyderabad, Telangana, 500068<br />
An exploratory research study on an indigenous multi-cropping system, locally known as<br />
Akkadi, was undertaken in the Kannal village <strong>of</strong> Raichur district (Karnataka). Akkadi is an<br />
indigenous cropping system where rainfed farmers grow combinations <strong>of</strong> millets, pulses, oil<br />
seeds, and vegetables on the same farm land, same time. In this thoughtfully evolved<br />
traditional cropping system <strong>of</strong> Akkadi, crops are combined in such a manner that harvesting<br />
<strong>of</strong> crops starts from the second month after sowing and continues up to nine months.<br />
Pigeonpea, sorghum/pearl Millet crops constitute major proportion in Akkadi cropping<br />
system relative to the greengram, cowpea, moth bean, roselle, castor, and beans. The crop<br />
layout consists <strong>of</strong> three rows <strong>of</strong> sorghum or pearl Millet crop followed by a row <strong>of</strong> red gram<br />
intercrop (Fig). The row-to-row spacing between sorghum or pearl millet crop is 30 cm.<br />
To document the indigenous cropping system <strong>of</strong> Akkadi traditionally practiced in Lingusur<br />
and Maski tehsil <strong>of</strong> Raichur districts and understand the its design principles.<br />
Methodology<br />
Study Area: Akkadiis traditionally practiced in Lingusur and Maski tehsil <strong>of</strong> Raichur district<br />
Karnataka. Study was conducted in Kannal village 15°56'18.9"N& 76°28'31.6"E <strong>of</strong><br />
Maskitehsil. The study was conducted in three steps. The first step was to explore the existing<br />
traditional cropping system through network groups. Cropping system was selected based on<br />
the characteristics such as multi-crops, one-time sowing with multiple harvests at multiple<br />
times, multi-tier, covers soils for a longer duration, and specific phenotypes <strong>of</strong> crops in the<br />
system. Detailed analytical documentation <strong>of</strong> the identified traditional cropping system was<br />
done, with focus group discussions, key informants interviews, and field visits. Researchers<br />
along with the panel <strong>of</strong> experts, analysed the documentation and evaluated the system for<br />
identification <strong>of</strong> any design principles guiding the traditional cropping system.<br />
164 | Page<br />
Ecosystem based approaches for climate change adaptation, ecosystem services, integrated farming system models,<br />
Land degradation neutrality
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Results<br />
Akkadi Cropping System Layout Cover Duration <strong>of</strong> crop and<br />
soil cover<br />
The results <strong>of</strong> this exploratory study are analyses using following principle: multi-crops, one<br />
time sowing with multiple harvests at multiple times, multi-tier, covers soils for longer<br />
duration, specific phenotypes <strong>of</strong> crops and rainfall use efficiency<br />
Crop Diversity and its phenotypes:<br />
Akkadi cropping system is a glide <strong>of</strong> crops consisting <strong>of</strong> millets, pulses, oil seeds, and<br />
vegetables. Akkadi cropping system has different crop combination models, practiced based<br />
on the requirement <strong>of</strong> rainfed farmers. Crop combination with different maturity period, and a<br />
specific phenology helps the crops to complement each other growth.<br />
Multi-tier cropping system with multiple harvestings<br />
The Akkadi cropping system has crop combinations <strong>of</strong> varying heights (1 to 12ft) and<br />
maturity period (three to nine months), at any given point <strong>of</strong> time one can see some crops<br />
ready to harvest whereas other at their vegetative stage protecting the soil cover and<br />
improving its health because <strong>of</strong> crop biomass refer Crop combination <strong>of</strong> varying heights, root<br />
depths, maturing stages, harness sunlight, soil moisture, soil nutrient, and land space most<br />
effectively.<br />
Rainfall use efficiency: The hot arid climate <strong>of</strong> Lingusur region is subjected to prolonged<br />
dry spells and the erratic nature <strong>of</strong> rainfall.22% <strong>of</strong> the total annual average rainfall (599 mm)<br />
Ecosystem based approaches for climate change adaptation, ecosystem services, integrated farming system<br />
models, Land degradation neutrality<br />
165 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
is received during October to February month. Long duration crops <strong>of</strong> Akkadi system<br />
effectively utilises this rainfall.<br />
Household Nutrition<br />
With this indigenous farming system, rainfed farmers have access to food high in calories,<br />
protein and dietary fibre. This system ensures annual food and nutrition for the rainfed<br />
farmers and fodder security for livestock.<br />
Conclusion<br />
The study on the indigenous multi-cropping system <strong>of</strong> Akkadi demonstrates that traditional<br />
knowledge is core to adaptive changes using available resources essential to face climate<br />
change, the nutrition quality <strong>of</strong> food, and other current issues related to the mono-cropping<br />
system. Policy-level interventions for understanding these cropping systems and their<br />
mainstreaming are the need <strong>of</strong> the hour. Decentralized agroecological approaches and<br />
participatory research methods for establishing scientific evidence on biophysical and socioeconomic<br />
parameters <strong>of</strong> indigenous multi-cropping systems are needed to revitalize rainfed<br />
agriculture.<br />
T2-11R-1559<br />
Carbon Sequestration as a Major Regulating Ecosystem Service from<br />
Dryland Agr<strong>of</strong>orestry Systems<br />
K. B. Sridhar*, G. Ravindra Chary 2 , Mudlagiriappa 3 , M.S Shirahatti 4 ., S.B Patil 5 ., M.<br />
R. Umesh 6 , B. Narsimlu 7 , K.A. Gopinath 8<br />
1,2,7,8 , All India Coordinated Research Project on Dryland Agriculture, CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
3 AICRPDA Centre, UAS Bengaluru, Karnataka, India<br />
4,5 AICRPDA Centre, UAS Dharwad, Karnataka, India<br />
6 AICRPDA Centre, UAS Raichur, Karnataka, India<br />
*sriaranya@gmail.com<br />
Trees are the largest terrestrial sink <strong>of</strong> carbon dioxide. Agr<strong>of</strong>orestry systems serve as a C sink<br />
and help mitigate GHG emissions from agriculture (Duguma et al., 2017). The potential <strong>of</strong><br />
agr<strong>of</strong>orestry in carbon capture and storage varies with the type <strong>of</strong> agr<strong>of</strong>orestry practiced, the<br />
tree species used and climatic zones (Kuyah et al., 2019).Agr<strong>of</strong>orestry has been recognized as<br />
having the greatest potential for C sequestration <strong>of</strong> all the land uses analyzed in the LULUCF<br />
report <strong>of</strong> the IPCC (2000).Agr<strong>of</strong>orestry systems are believed to have a higher potential to<br />
sequester carbon (C) because <strong>of</strong> their perceived ability for greater capture and utilization <strong>of</strong><br />
growth resources (light, nutrients, and water than single-species crop or pasture systems (Nair<br />
et al., 2010) About 50% <strong>of</strong> tree dry biomass is considered as carbon. As the trees grow, they<br />
sequester carbon in their tissues and release oxygen into the atmosphere. Land use systems<br />
166 | Page<br />
Ecosystem based approaches for climate change adaptation, ecosystem services, integrated farming system models,<br />
Land degradation neutrality
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
involving trees have the potential to positively impact climate change by reducing<br />
atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) and providing long-term carbon (C) storage. Agr<strong>of</strong>orestry<br />
<strong>of</strong>fers greater potential to increase C sequestration <strong>of</strong> predominantly agriculture-dominated<br />
landscapes than mono-crop agriculture by storing C in above- and belowground biomass,<br />
soil, and living and dead organisms and further extending the duration <strong>of</strong> C in soils. Trees<br />
reduce the amount <strong>of</strong> carbon in the atmosphere by sequestering carbon in new growth every<br />
year. The amount <strong>of</strong> carbon annually sequestered is increased with the size and health <strong>of</strong> the<br />
tree. The CO 2 Fix model is an easy-to-use model which simulates carbon in trees, soil and<br />
wood products as well. The objective <strong>of</strong> this study was to quantify carbon in trees in major<br />
agr<strong>of</strong>orestry systems practiced in different agroclimatic zones and altitudinal gradients <strong>of</strong><br />
different rainfed agro-ecologies.<br />
Methodology<br />
The study was conducted at three centers <strong>of</strong> All India Coordinated Research on Dryland<br />
agriculture. The agr<strong>of</strong>orestry systems comprised <strong>of</strong> Melia dubia (semi-arid vertisols) at<br />
Raichur, Karnataka, Custard apple-based and Aonla-based agr<strong>of</strong>orestry systems (semi-arid<br />
alfisols) at Bengaluru Karnataka, and Tamarind and guava-based agr<strong>of</strong>orestry systems (semiarid<br />
vertisols) at vijaypura, Karnataka. The CO2 Fix model was usedto quantify carbon<br />
sequestration potential. This model simulates carbon in trees, soil and wood products as<br />
well.The present method is purely based on CAI (Current Annual Increment). The trees were<br />
categorized as fast-growing and slow-growing based on their nature <strong>of</strong> growth. Where Melia<br />
dubia was categorized as fast-growing (specific gravity -0.34), Tamarindus indica (specific<br />
gravity -0.72), Emblica<strong>of</strong>ficianalis (specific gravity -0.78), and Annona squamosa (specific<br />
gravity -0.65) was categorized as slow growing respectively.<br />
Results<br />
It was evident from the table that Melia dubia recorded the highest carbon sequestration<br />
potential 6.74 Mg C ha -1 yr -1 followed by Guava and Custard apple (4.40) and (4.41) Mg C<br />
ha -1 yr -1 respectively. The least was noticed in Aonla (2.16) and Tamarind-based agr<strong>of</strong>orestry<br />
system (3.72). the net carbon sequestered in agr<strong>of</strong>orestry systems over the simulated period<br />
<strong>of</strong> thirty years was found maximum in Melia dubia-based agr<strong>of</strong>orestry systems 201.54 Mg C<br />
ha -1 yr -1 and the least was noticed in Aonla-based agr<strong>of</strong>orestry systems. 64.80 Mg C ha-1yr-1.<br />
Ecosystem based approaches for climate change adaptation, ecosystem services, integrated farming system<br />
models, Land degradation neutrality<br />
167 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Estimated carbon sequestration potential <strong>of</strong> agr<strong>of</strong>orestry systems (Mg C ha -1 yr -1 )<br />
Parameters<br />
Melia<br />
dubia<br />
Tamarind Guava Custard<br />
apple<br />
Aonla<br />
Location Raichur Vijayapura Vijayapura Bengaluru Bengaluru<br />
Geographical Location<br />
Latitude (degrees) 16°11’<br />
34’’<br />
16° 46’<br />
5.1’’<br />
16° 46’<br />
5.1’’<br />
13° 5’14’’ 13° 5’14’’<br />
Longitude (degrees) 77° 19’<br />
01’’<br />
75° 44’<br />
42.4’’<br />
75° 44’<br />
42.4’’<br />
77°<br />
34’12’’<br />
77°<br />
34’12’’<br />
Spacing (M) 5 X 5 10X3 3.5 X3.5 5X5 5X5<br />
Number <strong>of</strong> trees/ hectare 400 333 816 400 400<br />
Year <strong>of</strong> establishment 2017 2014 2018 2009 2008<br />
Tree Biomass<br />
(above and<br />
below ground )<br />
in Mg DM ha -1<br />
Tree Biomass<br />
carbon<br />
(Mg C ha -1 )<br />
Baseline Biomass 21.39 44.54 42.23 31.87 20.69<br />
Simulated 441.27 277.55 317.62 307.81 155.70<br />
Baseline Carbon 10.26 21.37 20.27 15.29 9.93<br />
Simulated<br />
211.80 133.22 152.45 147.74 74.73<br />
Net carbon sequestered in<br />
agr<strong>of</strong>orestry systems over the<br />
simulated period <strong>of</strong> thirty<br />
years<br />
Carbon<br />
sequestered<br />
(Mg C ha -1 )<br />
Estimated carbon<br />
sequestration potential <strong>of</strong><br />
agr<strong>of</strong>orestry system (Mg C<br />
ha -1 yr -1 )<br />
201.54 111.84 132.18 132.45 64.80<br />
6.74 3.72 4.40 4.41 2.16<br />
Conclusion<br />
Agr<strong>of</strong>orestry has the potential to provide both economic and environmental benefits. IPCC<br />
has recognized agr<strong>of</strong>orestry as having the highest C sequestration potential <strong>of</strong> any land<br />
management system. The greater the land area that is occupied by trees, the greater the<br />
impact on atmospheric C. Agr<strong>of</strong>orestry systems play an effective role in global carbon<br />
sequestration, involved in carbon capture and long-term storage <strong>of</strong> atmospheric carbon<br />
dioxide. There is a need to promote short rotation and fast-growing trees for quicker capture<br />
and storage <strong>of</strong> carbon di oxide.<br />
168 | Page<br />
Ecosystem based approaches for climate change adaptation, ecosystem services, integrated farming system models,<br />
Land degradation neutrality
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
References<br />
Duguma LA, Nzyoka J, Minang PA, Bernard F. 2017. How Agr<strong>of</strong>orestry Propels Achievement <strong>of</strong><br />
Nationally Determined Contributions. ICRAF Policy Brief no. 34. World Agr<strong>of</strong>orestry<br />
Centre, Nairobi, Kenya.<br />
Shem Kuyah, Cory W. Whitney, Mattias Jonsson, Gudeta W. Sileshi, IngridÖborn, Catherine W.<br />
Muthuri, Eike Luedeling. 2019. Agr<strong>of</strong>orestry delivers a win-win solution for ecosystem<br />
services in sub-Saharan Africa. A meta-analysis. Agronomy for Sustainable Development.<br />
39:47.<br />
Udawatta RP, Walter D, Jose S. Carbon sequestration by forests and agr<strong>of</strong>orests: a reality check for<br />
the United States. Carbon Footprints 2022; 1:8. http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/cf.2022.06.<br />
P.K Ramachandran Nair, Vimala D.Nair, B. Mohan Kumar and Julia M. Showalter., 2010. Carbon<br />
sequestration in Agr<strong>of</strong>orestry systems. Advances in Agronomy. 108: 237-307.<br />
T2-11aR-1591<br />
Integrated Farming for Food and Nutrition Security <strong>of</strong> Small Farmers<br />
Besides Making the System Self-Reliant<br />
B. Bhargavi 1* , Umakanta Behera 2 , Swarna Ronanki 3 , G Ravindra Chary 1 , H.B.<br />
Santosh 1 , K.B. Sridhar 1 , B. Narsimlu 1 and V.K. Singh 1<br />
1 ICAR-Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, Hyderabad 500059, Telangana, India<br />
2 College <strong>of</strong> Agriculture, Kyrdemkulai, CAU, Meghalaya 793103, India<br />
3<br />
ICAR- Indian Institute <strong>of</strong> Millets Research, Hyderabad 500030, Telangana, India<br />
*bhargavi.bussa@icar.gov.in<br />
The conventional monoculture practice without multi-disciplinary approach is unsustainable<br />
in meeting the food and nutritional security as well as the livelihood <strong>of</strong> smallholders<br />
(Mahapatra and Behera, 2011). Due to low purchasing capacity <strong>of</strong> small and marginal<br />
farmers, it is difficult for them to maintain an optimum level <strong>of</strong> nutritive food intake, leaving<br />
them undernourished. It is irony that farmers who supply the food are the poorest and most<br />
hungry population group in developing countries. According to the estimates, 39% <strong>of</strong> the<br />
total Indian population are undernourished with majority <strong>of</strong> them in rural areas (Rawal et al.,<br />
2019). Integrated farming system provides nutrition security to a farmers’ family through the<br />
production <strong>of</strong> diversified food commodities such as cereal, pulses, oilseeds, vegetables, fruits,<br />
egg, milk, fish, meat etc. The higher returns from IFS were not only due to higher<br />
productivity but also due to lower cost <strong>of</strong> production, as by-products <strong>of</strong> various components<br />
are recycled within the system (Bhargavi and Behera 2020). In India, farming systems<br />
research has been largely focused on enhancing production, productivity and pr<strong>of</strong>itability<br />
without much emphasis on nutritional and energy outcomes. In this regard, this present study<br />
Ecosystem based approaches for climate change adaptation, ecosystem services, integrated farming system<br />
models, Land degradation neutrality<br />
169 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
was taken up to develop an IFS model that can ensure food and nutritional security for small<br />
land holders.<br />
Methodology<br />
This study was carried out during 2015-18 at ICAR-IARI, New Delhi on IFS encompassing<br />
crops (maize, pea, mustard, green gram, cotton, wheat, bottle gourd, onion and okra), dairy,<br />
fishery, duckery, poultry, biogas plant, fruit trees and agro-forestry on 1.0 ha area. Five<br />
cropping systems i.e., maize – pea – okra, maize – mustard – green gram, cotton – wheat,<br />
bottle gourd – onion and okra – wheat were taken up on 0.625 ha. Dairy unit with three<br />
crossbred cows (2 Holstein Friesian and 1 Jersey) was maintained. A biogas plant <strong>of</strong> Khadi<br />
and Village Industries Commission (KVIC) model <strong>of</strong> 2 m 3 capacity was established beside<br />
the dairy. Fisheries component was introduced through a fish pond covering an area <strong>of</strong> 1000<br />
m 2 with 50 m length, 20 m width and 2 m depth. Composite pisciculture was practiced with<br />
four species viz., catla (Catla catla), rohu (Labeo rohita), mrigal (Cirrhinus mrigala) and<br />
grass carp (Ctenopharyngodon idella) <strong>of</strong> different feeding habits were stocked together in<br />
ratio <strong>of</strong> 3:4:3:2. A low cost poultry house has been constructed on the fish pond in which<br />
poultry birds <strong>of</strong> Aseel- 12, Kadaknath-14, Ankleswar-12, and Nikobari-12 were reared.<br />
Thirty-five ducklings (8 months old) <strong>of</strong> Khaki Campbell breed, were brought into the duck<br />
house. Ducks range and remain in the fish pond during the day time and shelter in the shed at<br />
night. Thirty-seven Kinnow (Citrus reticulata), 30 lemon (Citrus limon), 15 banana (Musa<br />
paradisiaca) plants were grown all along the farm boundary with 4 m spacing between<br />
plants. Ten guava (Psidium guajava) and 10 mango (Mangifera indica) and 21 moringa<br />
(Moringa oleifera) trees were planted on the fish pond dyke for fruit production. Entire 1.0 ha<br />
farm was protected with barbed wire fence. The country bean (Lablab purpureus) and<br />
Spinach (Basella rubra) were raised along the fence.<br />
Results<br />
According to the dietary guidelines for Indians (NIN, ICMR, 2011), a balanced diet <strong>of</strong> a<br />
small family with 2 adults and 3 children daily needs 1450 g <strong>of</strong> cereals, 300 g <strong>of</strong> pulses, 1600<br />
g <strong>of</strong> vegetable, 2100 ml <strong>of</strong> milk and 500 g <strong>of</strong> fruits. In the present study IFS produced diverse<br />
food products i.e., 2 cereals (wheat, maize); 2 pulses (green gram, pea); 1 oilseed (mustard); 1<br />
fibre crop (cotton); 6 vegetables (okra, onion, bottle gourd, brinjal, spinach, bean); 5 fruits<br />
(guava (Psidium guajava), mango (Mangifera indica), mandarin (Citrus reticulate), acid lime<br />
(Citrus limon), banana (Musa paradisiaca). Annual milk yield from 3 dairy cows was 11553<br />
litres, with 30 litres production per day. From the small duckery unit 5059 eggs (14 eggs/day)<br />
were produced from 12,168 duck days in a year with an average egg production <strong>of</strong> 41.6 % <strong>of</strong><br />
the total duck days. A total <strong>of</strong> 2805 eggs were produced from poultry unit annually from<br />
13046 hen days with an average egg production <strong>of</strong> 21.5% <strong>of</strong> the total hen days. A total <strong>of</strong><br />
170 | Page<br />
Ecosystem based approaches for climate change adaptation, ecosystem services, integrated farming system models,<br />
Land degradation neutrality
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
7864 eggs were produced annually <strong>of</strong> which family requirement is 1500 eggs year -1 . Annual<br />
meat production from IFS was 160 kgs (live birds weight). The total fish biomass production<br />
was 759 kg from 0.1 ha area <strong>of</strong> pond. IFS provided farmer’s family, an excellent quality <strong>of</strong><br />
protein from fish and meat, which he was unable to purchase due to his low purchasing<br />
power. The high nutritional value <strong>of</strong> egg, fish, milk, meat overcome the undernourishment <strong>of</strong><br />
vulnerable groups such as infants and pre-school children, pregnant and lactating women<br />
(Edwards, 2000). The results (table 2) indicated that out <strong>of</strong> total production <strong>of</strong> cereals,<br />
vegetables, fruits, oilseed and milk, 55, 71, 77, 68 and 93% was marketable surplus,<br />
respectively. An IFS is more secure in the supply <strong>of</strong> food as it has a diversified/greater<br />
number <strong>of</strong> food species than the commercial farming system (Behera et al., 2018). Farmers<br />
could ‘grow everything they eat and eat everything they grow’, which reflects the King’s<br />
philosophy <strong>of</strong> self-sufficiency. Apart from increased household nutrition and income, the<br />
added benefits <strong>of</strong> IFS are local availability <strong>of</strong> fresh products and the provision <strong>of</strong> employment<br />
for household members (Bhargavi and Behera, 2020).<br />
Annual production and surplus <strong>of</strong> farm produce in IFS<br />
S. No. Produce Annual production Annual family requirement<br />
(kg)<br />
Annual<br />
(kg)<br />
1. Cereals 1444 kg 654 (45) 790 (55)<br />
2. Pulses 150 kg 109 (73) 41 (27)<br />
3. Vegetables 2045 kg 584 (29) 1461 (71)<br />
4. Fruits 802 kg 182 (23) 620 (77)<br />
5. Oilseed 113 kg 36 (32) 77 (68)<br />
6. Milk 11553 litres 766 (7) 10787 (93)<br />
7. Egg 7864 No. 1500 (23) 7864 (77)<br />
*values in parentheses indicate the percentage <strong>of</strong> total production<br />
Conclusion<br />
surplus<br />
IFS produced diverse food products i.e., 6 field crops produce, 6 vegetables, 5 fruits, milk,<br />
eggs, meat and fish. Out <strong>of</strong> total production <strong>of</strong> cereals, vegetables, fruits, oilseed and milk,<br />
45, 29, 23, 32 and 7% was family requirement and the rest 55, 71, 77, 68 and 93% was<br />
marketable surplus respectively. IFS make the farmer self-sufficient in terms <strong>of</strong> ensuring<br />
family members a balanced diet for leading a healthy life. Further direct benefits from IFS,<br />
apart from increased household nutrition and income, are local availability <strong>of</strong> fresh products<br />
and the provision <strong>of</strong> employment for household members.<br />
References<br />
Ecosystem based approaches for climate change adaptation, ecosystem services, integrated farming system<br />
models, Land degradation neutrality<br />
171 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Behera, U. K., Bhargavi, B., Meena, S.L., Raj Singh, Singh, V.K. 2018. Integrated farming<br />
system model for livelihood security and doubling the Income <strong>of</strong> small and marginal<br />
farmers under changing climate scenario. Indian Farming. 68: 32–36.<br />
Behera, U. K., Mahapatra, I.C. 1999. Income and employment generation for small and<br />
marginal farmers through integrated farming systems. Indian J. Agron. 44(3): 431-<br />
439.<br />
Bhargavi, B., Behera, U.K. 2020. Securing the livelihood <strong>of</strong> small and marginal farmers by<br />
diversifying farming systems. Curr Sci. 119: 854-860.<br />
Dietary guidelines for Indians 2011 - A Manual, NIN, ICMR, pp-91.<br />
Rawal, V., Bansal, V., Bansal, P. 2019. Prevalence <strong>of</strong> undernourishment in Indian states.<br />
Economic & Political Weekly 54 (15):35.<br />
T2-12R-1626<br />
Rainfed Integrated Farming System (RIFS) Model for Assuredrainfall<br />
Zone <strong>of</strong> Marathwada Region<br />
R.S. Raut, W.N. Narkhede, M.S. Pendke, P.H. Gourkhede, S.S. Suryavanshi<br />
A.S. Gunjkar<br />
All India Coordinated Research Project for Dryland Agriculture<br />
Vasantrao Naik Marathwada Krishi Vidyapeeth, Parbhani (Maharashtra) India 431 402<br />
Rainfed Integrated Farming System (RIFS) entail a holistic approach to farming aimed at<br />
meeting multiple demands. RIFS are characterized by temporal and spatial mixing <strong>of</strong> crops,<br />
livestock, goatry, poultry along with dryland horticulture and other allied activities in a single<br />
farm. Thereby, they cater the needs <strong>of</strong> small and marginal farmers. Traditional rainfed<br />
farming system was in existence in the domain districts <strong>of</strong> Marathwada region. A details<br />
survey <strong>of</strong> traditional RIFS was conducted in the area and found that crops + large ruminants /<br />
small ruminants are the common RIFS in this area. On station experiment was conducted to<br />
assess the net income from various components as well as to strengthen and recommend the<br />
model <strong>of</strong> the RIFS in assured rainfall zone <strong>of</strong> Marathwada region for 1 ha area. This model<br />
was tested from 2017-18 to 2021-22 with 0.60 ha area under crop components viz soybean –<br />
rabi sorghum, soybean chickpea cropping system, soybean pigeonpea (4:2) intercropping,<br />
cotton + soybean (1:1) intercropping on 0.15 ha area each. Area <strong>of</strong> 0.12 ha for fodder ,0.16<br />
for rainfed fruit crops 0.05 area for goat keeping and poultry birds and 0.078 area for farm<br />
pond was allotted. Under goatery component (7 + 1) and under poultry 100 birds <strong>of</strong> 1 batch<br />
was taken for study, fruit crops (mango and custard apple) was taken under horticulture<br />
component. During the year 2017-18 the net income from cropping system was Rs. 37990/-<br />
172 | Page<br />
Ecosystem based approaches for climate change adaptation, ecosystem services, integrated farming system models,<br />
Land degradation neutrality
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
which was increased to Rs. 42780/- in the year 2021-22. The income from goatery was Rs.<br />
29896/- in the year 2018-19 which increased to Rs. 64060/- in the year 2021-22. The total net<br />
income from this model was Rs. 39369/- in the year 2017-18 which increased to Rs. 127245/-<br />
in the year 2021-22. After a period <strong>of</strong> 5 years since its establishment, the net money returns<br />
Rs.42780/- were received from crops and cropping system. Similarly, the net return <strong>of</strong> Rs.<br />
84465/- were received from other allied activities like fodder, horticulture, goat and poultry.<br />
Overall net return <strong>of</strong> Rs. 127245/- was received from 1 ha. RIFS model.<br />
T2-13P-1036<br />
Maize and Black gram Strip-Intercropping System for Higher Productivity<br />
and Economics under Rainfed Conditions<br />
Anil Khokhar*, M.J. Singh, Abrar Yousuf, Mohammad Amin Bhat, Parminder Singh<br />
Sandhu and Balwinder Singh Dhillon<br />
Punjab Agricultural University-Regional Research Station, AICRPDA Centre Ballowal Saunkhri,<br />
Balachaur, Punjab 144521, India<br />
*anilkhokhar@pau.edu<br />
In the rainfed Kandi region <strong>of</strong> Punjab intercropping <strong>of</strong> maize with blackgram, and greengram<br />
has been found to increase productivity, pr<strong>of</strong>itability, improve soil health, reduce soil erosion<br />
and conserve soil moisture (Khokhar et al., 2021). But these intercropping systems are labour<br />
intensive and create hindrances in the use <strong>of</strong> agricultural machinery for weed control,<br />
harvesting, threshing etc. Strip-intercropping could be a viable strategy to overcome the<br />
disadvantages <strong>of</strong> traditional intercropping systems. In strip intercropping, the width <strong>of</strong> the<br />
strip is wide enough to allow independent cultivation <strong>of</strong> component crops grown but the<br />
strips are close enough for the crops to interact agronomically. Maize is the most important<br />
cereal crop cultivated under rainfed conditions in the Shivalik foothills region <strong>of</strong> North India<br />
(popularly called Kandi region) during kharif while blackgram is the most important among<br />
the pulses which is cultivated in this region during kharif. Maize and blackgram stripintercropping<br />
system may not only meet the cereal and pulse requirements <strong>of</strong> the people in<br />
this region but it may also increase the pr<strong>of</strong>itability and sustain the income <strong>of</strong> the farmers. In<br />
maize and blackgram strip-intercropping system, identification <strong>of</strong> optimum strip width is <strong>of</strong><br />
prime importance. But, little or no research has been conducted in the assessment <strong>of</strong> the<br />
optimum strip width for maize and blackgram strip-intercropping system which performs<br />
better than sole cropping <strong>of</strong> these crops. Thus, a field experiment was conducted for three<br />
years to find out the optimum strip width to increase the productivity and pr<strong>of</strong>itability <strong>of</strong><br />
maize and blackgram strip-cropping as compared to sole cropping.<br />
Methodology<br />
Ecosystem based approaches for climate change adaptation, ecosystem services, integrated farming system<br />
models, Land degradation neutrality<br />
173 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
A field experiment was conducted during the rainy (kharif) season in 2019, 2020 and 2021<br />
under rainfed conditions in a randomised block design with 4 replications. There were 6<br />
treatments with different strip widths <strong>of</strong> maize and blackgram, which included maize strip 3<br />
m wide and black gram 2.4 m(T1), maizestrip6 m wide and black gram 2.4 m (T2),<br />
maizestrip3 m wide and black gram 4.8 m (T3) , maize strip 6 m wide and black gram 4.8 m<br />
(T 4), sole maize (T 5) and sole black gram (T 6).The maize variety PMH-1 was sown at a<br />
spacing <strong>of</strong> 60 cm x 20 cm and blackgram variety mash-114 was sown at 30 cm x 10 cm<br />
spacing respectively using 20 kg seed per hectare for each crop. The crops were harvested<br />
from the last week <strong>of</strong> September to the first week <strong>of</strong> October during three years <strong>of</strong><br />
experimentation.<br />
Results<br />
Strip-intercropping <strong>of</strong> maize and black gram resulted in higher yield than sole crops <strong>of</strong> maize<br />
and black gram. The highest maize equivalent yield (MEY) was recorded in maize strip 6 m<br />
wide and black gram 2.4 m (3439 kgha -1 ) which was significantly higher overthe sole crop <strong>of</strong><br />
maize by 11.3% and black gram by 14.8% but at par with maize and black gram stripintercropping<br />
systems. The highest LER (1.14), rain water use efficiency (4.98kg ha -1 mm -1 )<br />
and net returns (Rs 40393 ha -1 ) was recorded with maize and black gram strip-intercropping<br />
in 6 m and 2.4 m, respectively. However, the BC ratio (2.32) was highest in maize strip 3 m<br />
and black gram strip width 4.8 m followed by 6 m and 2.4 m strip width (2.27).<br />
Effect <strong>of</strong> strip intercropping <strong>of</strong> maize and blackgram on maize equivalent yield (MEY),<br />
land equivalent ratios (LER), economics and rain water use efficiency (RWUE) (mean<br />
Treatments<br />
Maize 3 m strip and<br />
blackgram 2.4 m strip<br />
Maize 6 m strip and<br />
blackgram 2.4 m strip<br />
Maize 3 m strip and<br />
blackgram 4.8 m strip<br />
Maize 6 m strip and<br />
blackgram 4.8 m strip<br />
data <strong>of</strong> 3 year)<br />
Yield (kg ha -1 )<br />
Net<br />
RWUE<br />
B:C<br />
MEY LER returns<br />
Maize Blackgram (Rs ha -1 ratio<br />
) (kg ha -1 mm -1 )<br />
2119 403 3346 1.11 37891 2.25 4.70<br />
2589 279 3439 1.14 40393 2.27 4.98<br />
1420 591 3213 1.08 35991 2.32 4.27<br />
1997 425 3288 1.10 37221 2.25 4.57<br />
Sole maize at 60 cm x 20 cm 3052 - 3052 - 31348 1.84 4.69<br />
Sole blackgram at 30 cm x<br />
10 cm<br />
- 972 2931 - 32226 2.18 4.35<br />
CD (0.05) 125 60.0 263 0.10 5237 0.19 0.345<br />
Rainfall (mm) 659<br />
174 | Page<br />
Ecosystem based approaches for climate change adaptation, ecosystem services, integrated farming system models,<br />
Land degradation neutrality
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Conclusion<br />
Results <strong>of</strong> this three-year study indicated that maize and blackgram strip-intercropping<br />
system is more effective than a monoculture system in resource utilization. The cultivation <strong>of</strong><br />
maize in6 m wide strip and blackgram in 2.4 m wide or maize in3 m wide strip and<br />
blackgram in 2.4 m wide strip is the most efficient strip-intercropping system to get higher<br />
yield and economics than other combinations <strong>of</strong> rows.<br />
References<br />
Khokhar, A., Yousuf, A., Singh, M., Sharma, V., Sandhu, P.S., Chary, G.R. 2021. Impact <strong>of</strong><br />
land configuration and strip-intercropping on run<strong>of</strong>f, soil loss and crop yields under<br />
rainfed conditions in the Shivalik foot hills <strong>of</strong> North-West, India. Sustainability. 13,<br />
6282. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13116282.<br />
T2-14P-1073<br />
Influence <strong>of</strong> Crop Geometry and Plant Growth Regulators on Production<br />
Potential <strong>of</strong> Pigeon Pea (Cajanuscajan (L.) Millsp.)<br />
S.U. Pawar 1* , W.N. Narkhede 2 , B.V. Asewar 3 and Mirza Iab 4<br />
Department <strong>of</strong> Agronomy,<br />
Vasantrao Naik Marathwada Krishi Vidyapeeth, Parbhani (M.S.) – 431402.<br />
*pawarsu7@rediffmail.com , agronomistsup@gmail.com<br />
Pigeonpea being highly branching and indeterminate growth habit responds very well to crop<br />
geometry. Hence to achieve potential yields, it is important to maintain optimum plant<br />
population which can effectively utilize available moisture, nutrients and solar radiation. The<br />
plant growth regulators are also known to enhance the source sink relationship and stimulate<br />
the translocation <strong>of</strong> photo assimilates, thereby increase the productivity. There is need for<br />
scientific manipulation by synchronizing plant growth through growth regulating chemicals,<br />
which can check the excessive vegetative growth, thereby creating proper balance between<br />
source and sink for enhanced crop yield and standardize the plant density to exploit yield<br />
potential. Considering these points the present investigation attempted to stabilize yield with<br />
the following objectives: the objectives: (i) To find out the effect <strong>of</strong> crop geometry on growth<br />
and yield <strong>of</strong> pigeon pea, (ii) To find out the effect <strong>of</strong> plant growth regulators on morpho<br />
physiological, yield components, productivity and seed quality <strong>of</strong> pigeonpea, and (iii) To find<br />
out effect <strong>of</strong> crop geometry and plant growth regulators on economics <strong>of</strong> pigeonpea.<br />
Methodology:<br />
The field experiments on pigeonpea (Var. BDN-711) were conducted at research farm <strong>of</strong><br />
Agronomy department, Vasantrao Naik Marathwada Krishi Vidyapeeth, Parbhani (MS)<br />
Ecosystem based approaches for climate change adaptation, ecosystem services, integrated farming system<br />
models, Land degradation neutrality<br />
175 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
during kharif season <strong>of</strong> 2018, 2019 and 2020. The field experiment was laid out in split plot<br />
design and replicated thrice. Treatment consisted <strong>of</strong> twenty treatment combinations<br />
comprising four crop geometry in main plot and five foliar applications <strong>of</strong> plant growth<br />
regulators in sub plot. Sowing was done on 26 th June 2018, 28 th June 2019 and 29 th June<br />
2020 during first, second and third year <strong>of</strong> experimentation, respectively. The recommended<br />
dose <strong>of</strong> NPK and plant protection schedule was followed. Periodical observations <strong>of</strong> growth<br />
and yield contributing characters <strong>of</strong> pigeonpea along with the yield data were recorded and<br />
statistically analyzed to evaluate the effect <strong>of</strong> different treatments. The fertility co-efficient<br />
<strong>of</strong> pigeonpea was arrived from relationship between the number <strong>of</strong> flowers produced per<br />
plant and the number<strong>of</strong> pods produced per plant and the results were expressed in terms <strong>of</strong><br />
percentage (Sumathi et al. 2016).<br />
Results:<br />
The data from tables revealed that, crop geometry and foliar application <strong>of</strong> plant growth<br />
regulators significantly influenced the growth, yield and economics <strong>of</strong> pigeonpea. Crop<br />
geometry <strong>of</strong> 120cmx20cm and 75-150cmx20cm recorded higher values <strong>of</strong> growth and yield<br />
parameters per plant, followed by crop geometry <strong>of</strong> 60-120cmx20cm.Maximum seed yield<br />
was recorded with the interaction <strong>of</strong> crop geometry 60-120cmx20cm (S3) with foliar<br />
application <strong>of</strong> Brassinosteroids @ 0.1 ppm which was at par with interaction <strong>of</strong> crop<br />
geometry 60-120cmx20cm with foliar application <strong>of</strong> NAA @ 40 ppm and interaction <strong>of</strong> crop<br />
geometry 90cmx20cm with foliar application <strong>of</strong> Brassinosteroids @ 0.1 ppm . These results<br />
agree with findings reported by Kashyap et al., (2002), Ramesh and Ramprasad (2013),<br />
Sumathi et al. (2016). The highest net realization was recorded with the interaction <strong>of</strong> crop<br />
geometry 60-120cmx20cm with foliar application <strong>of</strong> Brassinosteroids @ 0.1 ppm and<br />
interaction <strong>of</strong> crop geometry 90cmx20cm with foliar application <strong>of</strong> Brassinosteroids @ 0.1<br />
ppm, interaction <strong>of</strong> crop geometry 60-120cmx20cm with foliar application NAA @ 40 ppm<br />
and with interaction <strong>of</strong> crop geometry 90cmx20cm with foliar application <strong>of</strong> NAA @ 40<br />
ppm.<br />
Conclusion<br />
Based on the three years findings <strong>of</strong> present investigation, it is concluded that crop geometry<br />
<strong>of</strong> 60-120cmx20cm and 90cmx20cm for pigeonpea were found to be productive, pr<strong>of</strong>itable<br />
and remunerative as compared to crop geometries. While among the different plant growth<br />
regulators, foliar application <strong>of</strong> Brassinosteroids @ 0.1 ppm (02 sprays at bud initiation and<br />
flowering) was found to be beneficial in improving yield parameters, seed yield, net returns<br />
and also the fertility co-efficient <strong>of</strong> pigeonpea, as compared to other plant growth regulators.<br />
References<br />
176 | Page<br />
Ecosystem based approaches for climate change adaptation, ecosystem services, integrated farming system models,<br />
Land degradation neutrality
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Kashyap, T. L., Shrivastava, G. K., Lakpale, R. and Chaubey, N. K. 2002. Productivity<br />
potential <strong>of</strong> pigeonpea (Cajanuscajan L. Mill sp.) genotypes in response to growth<br />
regulators under Vertisols <strong>of</strong> Chhatisgarh plains. Ann. Agric. Res. 24(2): 449-452.<br />
Ramesh, R. and Ramprasad, E. 2013. Effect <strong>of</strong> Plant growth regulators on morphological,<br />
physiological and biochemical parameters <strong>of</strong> soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merrill.)<br />
Helix. 6:441-447.<br />
Sumathi, A., Babu Rajendra Prasad, V. and Mallika Vanangamudi. 2016. Influence <strong>of</strong> plant<br />
growth regulators on yield and yield components in pigeonpea. Legume Res. LR-<br />
3637 [1-7]<br />
Mean seed yield (kg ha -1 ) <strong>of</strong> pigeonpea as influenced by different treatments during<br />
2018, 2019, 2020 & pooled mean.<br />
Main Plot: Crop geometry<br />
Treatments Seed yield (kg ha -1 )<br />
2018 2019 2020 Pooled<br />
S 1: 90 cm X20cm 1466 1782 1480 1573<br />
S 2 :120 cm x20cm 1239 1572 1284 1365<br />
S 3: 60-120 cm x20cm 1661 1982 1546 1729<br />
S4: 75-150 cm x20cm 1281 1361 1313 1318<br />
S.E.(m)+ 57.52 72.37 39.6 50.9<br />
C.D. at 5% 199.02 254.74 137.1 176.0<br />
Sub Plot (Plant Growth regulators) (02 sprays at bud initiation and flowering)<br />
G 1: NAA @ 40 ppm 1630 1847 1537 1671<br />
G 2: Mepiquat chloride @ 50 g a.iha -1 1384 1596 1360 1447<br />
G 3: Brassinosteroids @ 0.1 % 1742 2018 1576 1778<br />
G 4: Chlormequat Chloride @ 75 g a.iha -1 1212 1583 1334 1376<br />
G 5: Control 1089 1328 1210 1209<br />
S.E.(m)+ 34.97 79.55 46.0 33.0<br />
C.D. at 5% 96.78 220.18 132.6 95.1<br />
S X F Interaction<br />
S.E.(m)+ 69.94 159.12 92.02 74.85<br />
C.D. at 5% 193.56 440.36 254.68 207.16<br />
General Mean 1412 1674 1403 1496<br />
Ecosystem based approaches for climate change adaptation, ecosystem services, integrated farming system<br />
models, Land degradation neutrality<br />
177 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
T2-15P-1112<br />
Yield and Biological Efficiencies <strong>of</strong> Millet-Based Intercropping Systems<br />
Under Dryland Conditions at Bastar Plateau Zone <strong>of</strong> Chhattisgarh<br />
Ashwani Kumar Thakur, Tejpal Chandrakar, Ashish Kumar Kerketta and<br />
G. Ravindrachary<br />
SG College <strong>of</strong> Agriculture and Research Station,Jagdalpur, Indira Gandhi Krishi Vishwavidyalaya<br />
(CG) India-494001<br />
agrosgcars@rediffmail.com<br />
Millet is one <strong>of</strong> the most popular food grain crops grown in almost all tribal belts <strong>of</strong><br />
Chattisgarh. It is extensively grown under both a sole and mixed cropping system through the<br />
broadcast method <strong>of</strong> sowing. In Bastar Plateau Zone, the area under small millets was 28.41<br />
thousand hectares, which was 39.73 percent <strong>of</strong> Chhattisgarh State (71.50 thousand hectares).<br />
While, the total production was 7.95 thousand tons which were37.06 percent <strong>of</strong> Chhattisgarh<br />
State's production <strong>of</strong> small millets <strong>of</strong> 21.45 thousand tons. The intercropping system <strong>of</strong><br />
cereals + pigeon pea/legumes were tested and found to be pr<strong>of</strong>itable system. Reason for the<br />
yield advantage in the intercropping system was because the component crops differed in the<br />
utilization <strong>of</strong> growth resources and converting them more efficiently resulting in a higher<br />
yield per unit area than that produced by the sole crops (Patil et al., 2010).This paper<br />
evaluated different millet based intercropping systems for their biological efficiency<br />
Methodology<br />
A field experiment was conducted during the Kharif season 2019 in the Entisols <strong>of</strong><br />
Instructional cum Research Farm, Lamker, S. G. College <strong>of</strong> Agriculture and Research<br />
Station, Kumhrawand, Jagdalpur, Chhattisgarh, India. During the cropping season total <strong>of</strong><br />
2033.00 mm rainfall was received with 78 rainy days. Available N was low available P was<br />
very low and available K was high in the experiment field with acidic reaction and bulk<br />
density was 1.35. The experiment consists <strong>of</strong> three replications with nine treatments that<br />
were laid out in a randomized complete block design (RCBD). The treatments are: T1: 1 st<br />
Base crop + intercrop (4:1), T 2: 1 st Base crop + intercrop (6:1), T 3: 1 st Base crop +<br />
intercrop (8:1), T4: 2 nd Base crop + intercrop (4:1), T5: 2 nd Base crop + intercrop (6:1),<br />
T 6: 2 nd Base crop + intercrop (8:1), T 7: Sole crop <strong>of</strong> 1 st Base crop, T 8: Sole crop <strong>of</strong> 2 nd<br />
Base crop, T 9: Sole crop <strong>of</strong> intercrop. Land equivalent ratio, Area time equivalent ratio,<br />
aggressivity, Relative Crowding Co-efficient , Harvest Index (%) and Millet Grain<br />
Equivalent Yield (MGEY kg ha -1 ) are computed with formula.<br />
178 | Page<br />
Ecosystem based approaches for climate change adaptation, ecosystem services, integrated farming system models,<br />
Land degradation neutrality
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Results<br />
The study reveals that grain yield, straw yield, and test weight are influenced significantly<br />
due to different treatments. In base crop treatment, sole kodo millet (T 7) recorded<br />
significantly higher grain, straw, and test weight among all the treatments but it was observed<br />
at par with kodo millet + pgeonpea 8:1 ratio (T3), kodo millet + pigeonpea 6:1 ratio (T2) and<br />
kodomillet + pigeonpea 4:1 ratio (T 1) in straw yield and test weight. Harvest index was<br />
recorded as not significant effect due to different treatments but numerically highest HI was<br />
observed in sole barnyard millet (T 8) among all treatments. Similar results were reported by<br />
Kuriet al. (2012). The highest LER was recorded in the treatment kodo millet + pigeonpea<br />
4:1 ratio (T1) which was found on par with kodo millet + pigeonpea 6:1 ratio (T2), kodo<br />
millet + pigeonpea 8:1 ratio (T 3) and barnyard millet + pigeonpea 8:1 ratio (T 6).<br />
Conclusion<br />
Land equivalent ratio and relative crowding co-efficient were produced highest in sole<br />
Kodomillet. Aggressively was recorded higher positive sign in Kodo+ pigeon pea 8:1 row<br />
ratio in base crop and intercrop; Kodomillet + pigeonpea 4:1 row ratio produced higher<br />
positive aggressivity, area time equivalent ratio and millet grain equivalent ratio.<br />
References:<br />
Keerthanapriya, S., Hemalatha, M., Joseph, M. and Prabina, B.J. 2019. Assessment <strong>of</strong><br />
competitiveness and yield advantages <strong>of</strong> little millet based intercropping system<br />
under rainfed condition. Int. J. Chem. Stud. 7(3): 4121-4124.<br />
Kuri, B. R., Yadav, R. S. and Kumawat, A. 2012. Evaluation <strong>of</strong> pear lmillet<br />
(Pennisetumglaucum) and moth bean (Vigna acconitifolia) intercropping systems in<br />
hyper arid partially irrigated north-western plains zone. Ind. J. Agric. Sci. 82(11):<br />
993-996.<br />
Patil, N. B., Halikatti, S. I., Sujay, Y.H., Kumar, P. Sanjay, B. H., Topagi, C. and Pushpa,<br />
V. 2010. Influence <strong>of</strong> intercropping on the growth and yield <strong>of</strong> little millet and<br />
pigeonpea. Int. J. Agric. Sci. 6(2): 602-604.<br />
Triveni, U., Sandhya Rani, Y., Patro, T. S. S. K., Anuradha, N. and Divya, M. 2017.<br />
Evaluation <strong>of</strong> different finger millet based intercropping systems in the north<br />
coastal zone <strong>of</strong> Andhra Pradesh. Int. J. Cosmet. Sci. (5), pp.828-831.<br />
Ecosystem based approaches for climate change adaptation, ecosystem services, integrated farming system<br />
models, Land degradation neutrality<br />
179 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Effect <strong>of</strong> different treatments on the Biological Efficiency <strong>of</strong> Intercropping System<br />
Treatment<br />
LER<br />
LEC<br />
CV % 6.06 6.89 6.79 11.64 9.16<br />
Treat descriptions are given in methodology section.<br />
T2-16P-1117<br />
Effect <strong>of</strong> Mechanization Practices on Economics <strong>of</strong> Soyabean-Safflower<br />
Cropping System<br />
S.A. Shinde*, P.O. Bhutada and S.B.Ghuge<br />
All India Coordinate Research Project on Safflower,<br />
Vasantrao Naik Marathwada Krishi Vidyapeeth Parbhani, Maharashtra, India.<br />
*santoshashinde338@gmail.com<br />
Oilseed crops are the second most important determinant <strong>of</strong> agricultural economy, next only<br />
to cereals within the segment <strong>of</strong> field crops. Among oilseed Safflower<br />
(CarthamustinctoriusL.) is an important oilseed crop with 35-40 % oil. It has been used as a<br />
source <strong>of</strong> edible oil and dying since ancient time. Effective use <strong>of</strong> agriculture machinery<br />
helps to increase productivity and production <strong>of</strong> output, undertake timely farm operations.<br />
This judicious use <strong>of</strong> time, labour and resources facilitates sustainable intensification and<br />
timely. Planting <strong>of</strong> crops, leading to an increase in productivity. Hence Mechanical power has<br />
become more economical and indispensable to meet targets <strong>of</strong> timeliness and efficient<br />
utilization <strong>of</strong> natural resources and inputs (Srinivasaraoet al., 2013) Mechanization in<br />
safflower crop will help to timely field operation and easy for harvesting and save huge cost<br />
<strong>of</strong> cultivation and sort the labour problem <strong>of</strong> farmer. This study is therefore carried out to<br />
determine suitable mechanization practice in safflower.<br />
Biological Efficiency<br />
Relative Crowding Co-efficient<br />
Ks Ki Ki ×Ks=K<br />
T1 1.75 0.76 0.84 1.59 1.23<br />
T2 1.71 0.73 0.78 0.78 0.57<br />
T3 1.65 0.68 1.04 0.29 0.29<br />
T4 1.53 0.59 0.53 0.58 0.32<br />
T5 1.60 0.64 0.81 0.36 0.3<br />
T6 1.61 0.67 0.86 0.28 0.23<br />
T7 1.00 1.00 0.00 - 0.00<br />
T8 1.00 1.00 0.00 - 0.00<br />
T9 1.00 1.00 - 0.00 0.00<br />
SEm± 0.05 0.03 0.02 0.04 0.02<br />
CD at 5% 0.15 0.10 0.07 0.13 0.05<br />
180 | Page<br />
Ecosystem based approaches for climate change adaptation, ecosystem services, integrated farming system models,<br />
Land degradation neutrality
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Methodology<br />
A field experiment was conducted during the period <strong>of</strong> 2020-21 at All India coordinated<br />
Research Project on Safflower, V.N.M.K.V., Parbhani. The soil was clayey in texture, low in<br />
available nitrogen (231 kg ha-1), low in available phosphorus (12.64 kg ha-1), rich in<br />
available potash (474 kg ha-1), sulphur (15.25 kg ha-1) and slightly alkaline in reaction. The<br />
soil was moderately alkaline in reaction (8.13 pH). In general, weather conditions were<br />
favourable for plant growth and no severe pest and diseases noticed during experimentation.<br />
The study involved two treatment combinations two factors viz., Selective mechanization<br />
plot (SMP) and Farmer practice (FP) with two treatments. Each experimental unit was non<br />
replicated having Plot size 1000 m2 each <strong>of</strong> mechanical and normal plots. Sowing was<br />
completed as per treatments. Safflower variety PBNS -86 was sown at spacing <strong>of</strong> 45 cm<br />
(between rows) X 20 cm (between Plants) The fertilizer dose <strong>of</strong> 60:40:00 NPK kg ha-1 was<br />
applied at the time <strong>of</strong> sowing. The package <strong>of</strong> recommended practices were adopted. The data<br />
on growth and yield parameters were analysed with paired ‘t’ test and cost <strong>of</strong> cultivation, net<br />
returns, B:C ratio were worked out. Data on time period for each operation, energy used<br />
were converted into suitable energy units and expressed in MJ/ha. Energy equivalents <strong>of</strong><br />
inputs and outputs were computed based on values suggested by Gopalanet al. (1978) The<br />
calculation <strong>of</strong> energy input and output equivalents, the indices <strong>of</strong> energy ratio (energy use<br />
efficiency), energy productivity and net energy were calculated as per (Rafieeet al., 2010) .<br />
Following parameter selected under selective mechanization vis-à-vis Farmers practice in<br />
terms <strong>of</strong> yield, economics and energy budgeting <strong>of</strong> Safflower<br />
S.No Name <strong>of</strong> field operation Mechanized condition Farmer's practice<br />
1 Sowing With Seed cum<br />
Fertilizer Drill<br />
Behind the bullock<br />
drawn plough<br />
2 Inter cultivation Power weeder Bullock drawn Danthi<br />
3 Plant protection Motorized/ power<br />
sprayers<br />
4 Harvesting, threshing and winnowing Combiner with minute<br />
modification<br />
Knapsack sprayer<br />
Manual<br />
Results<br />
Safflower seed yield (1485 kg/ha) which was higher than farmer practice (1251 kg/ha). Seed<br />
yield <strong>of</strong> safflower was increased by 18.70% observed under mechanized condition compared<br />
to farmers practice similar result recorded by Mandal (1975). Similarly Singh and Singh<br />
(1975) concluded that tractor farms gave higher yields <strong>of</strong> wheat, paddy and sugarcane and<br />
produced a higher overall gross output per hectare than non-tractor farms. Proper plant to<br />
plant population and optimum management practice can be adopted under mechanization<br />
Ecosystem based approaches for climate change adaptation, ecosystem services, integrated farming system<br />
models, Land degradation neutrality<br />
181 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
than farmer practice which helps to increase or record good growth <strong>of</strong> crop than famer<br />
practice. Further, the cost <strong>of</strong> cultivation incurred for normal method <strong>of</strong> cultivation was higher<br />
(53921) compared to mechanized safflower cultivation (45101) leading to higher net returns<br />
(100699) and B:C ratio (3.20) in mechanized plot Comparing the yield and economics <strong>of</strong><br />
cultivation methods, mechanized plot reduced the labour requirement, time <strong>of</strong> operation and<br />
cultivation cost in turn resulted higher benefits.<br />
The energy use efficiency in mechanized plot (0.56kg/MJ) was higher than normal plot (0.27<br />
kg/MJ). This lead to saving <strong>of</strong> 17 labour / ha and saved 35hrs time period/ha through<br />
selective mechanization <strong>of</strong> important operations. The results were in agreement with the<br />
findings <strong>of</strong> SaeedFirouzi and HashemAminpanah (2012) who reported that Energy output –<br />
input ratio, specific energy, energy productivity, and net energy gain computed were 3.93,<br />
4.74 MJ/kg, in semi-mechanized groundnut production.<br />
Safflower yield, system economics under mechanized cultivation vs farmer's practice<br />
Treatments<br />
Mechanized<br />
conditions<br />
Farmer's<br />
practice<br />
References<br />
Seed yield<br />
(kg/ha)<br />
Biological yield<br />
(kg/ha)<br />
Gross<br />
returns<br />
(Rs/ha)<br />
System economics<br />
Cost <strong>of</strong> Net<br />
cultivation returns<br />
(Rs/ha) (Rs/ha)<br />
B:C<br />
ratio<br />
Soybean Safflower Soybean Safflower<br />
1755 1485 4920 4725 145800 45101 100699 3.2<br />
1571 1251 4400 3865 126990 53921 73069 2.4<br />
Anonymous. 2015. All India Coordinated Research Project on Castor. Annual Report. ICAR-<br />
Indian Institute <strong>of</strong> oilseeds Research Hyderabad-500030<br />
Gopalan, C.B., Ramasastri, V. and Balasubramanian, S.C. 1978. Nutritive value <strong>of</strong> Indian<br />
foods (Hyderbad: National Institute<strong>of</strong> Nutrition)<br />
Mandal, G.C. and Prasad R.N. 1975. Economics <strong>of</strong> Tractor Cultivation-A study <strong>of</strong> the district<br />
<strong>of</strong> Shahabad, Bihar. Shanti Niketan, Agro-Economic Research Centre, VisvaBharati.<br />
Rafiee, S., Mousavi Avval, S. H. and Mohammadi, A. 2010. Modelling and sensitivity<br />
analysis <strong>of</strong> energy inputs for apple production in Iran. Energy, 35:3301-3306<br />
Singh, L.R. and Singh, R.V. 1975. Impact <strong>of</strong> Farm Mechanization on Human and Bullock<br />
Labour Use in Two Regions <strong>of</strong> U.P. Dept <strong>of</strong> Agri. Economics. G.B. Pant Univ. <strong>of</strong><br />
Agril.and Technology.<br />
Saeed, Firouzi and Hashem, Aminpanah.2012. Energy use efficiency for groundnut (Arachis<br />
182 | Page<br />
Ecosystem based approaches for climate change adaptation, ecosystem services, integrated farming system models,<br />
Land degradation neutrality
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
hypogaea L-) production in a semi-mechanized cultivation system. Annals <strong>of</strong> Biological<br />
Reseah, 3(8):3994-3997<br />
Srinivasrao, Ch., Sreenath, Dixit., Srinivas, I, Sanjeeva Reddy, B., Adake, R. V. and Shailesh<br />
Borkar. 2013. Operationalization <strong>of</strong> Custom Hiring Centres on Farm Implements in<br />
Hundred Villages in India. Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture,<br />
Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh 151.<br />
T2-17P-1232<br />
Performance and Adaptability <strong>of</strong> Different Improved Variety <strong>of</strong> Backyard<br />
Poultry in Garhwa District <strong>of</strong> Jharkhand<br />
Sushma Lalita Baxla 1 , Ashok Kumar 2 and Sudhir Kumar Jha 3<br />
1,2<br />
Krishi Vigyan Kendra Garhwa, Birsa Agricultural University, Ranchi-834006 Jharkhand,<br />
India<br />
3<br />
Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Palamu,Birsa Agricultural University, Ranchi-834006 Jharkhand,<br />
India<br />
Backyard poultry farming is an age-old traditional practice in rural India. It comprises rearing<br />
<strong>of</strong> indigenous birds with poor production performance in terms <strong>of</strong> egg and meat. It plays a<br />
pivotal role in supplementary income generation and nutrition security to the rural poor<br />
(Choudhary et al., 2019, Kiskuetal., 2019). Generally in backyard poultry farming, farmer<br />
rears 5-10 indigenous desi birds which produce 50-60 eggs per year and low meat production<br />
(Shekhar et al., 2020). Jharkhand is tribal dominated state where backyard poultry is one <strong>of</strong><br />
the main source <strong>of</strong> livelihood for tribal and other low income farmers. Garhwa is also having<br />
tribal and low-income group <strong>of</strong> scheduled caste as well as other backyard class <strong>of</strong> farmers<br />
who rear backyard poultry for their livelihood but due to lack <strong>of</strong> knowledge about improved<br />
breed and management practices, the productivity performance was very poor. There is<br />
constant demand for poultry meat and eggs in rural as well as urban areas <strong>of</strong> Garhwa district.<br />
Divyayan Red and Jharsim, an improved variety <strong>of</strong> dual purpose, multi colored plumage,<br />
better production potential, disease resistance and good scavenging behaviour poultry<br />
developed by Birsa Agricultural University, Ranchi, Jharkhand and Divyayan Krishi Vigyan<br />
Kendra, Ranchi, Jharkhand, respectively were taken as treatments in the present trial. The<br />
experiment was conducted at seven farmers field in two villages – Sangbariya and Tenar <strong>of</strong><br />
Meral block <strong>of</strong> Garhwa district under NICRA project. The productivity and pr<strong>of</strong>itability <strong>of</strong><br />
existing backyard poultry farming is very low. Considering these factors, an On Farm Trial<br />
was conducted to assess the performance <strong>of</strong> different improved variety <strong>of</strong> backyard poultry<br />
under free scavenging backyard system in Garhwa district <strong>of</strong> Jharkhand India<br />
Ecosystem based approaches for climate change adaptation, ecosystem services, integrated farming system<br />
models, Land degradation neutrality<br />
183 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Methodology<br />
An On Farm Trial was conducted at seven farmers field with three treatments <strong>of</strong> poultry in two<br />
villages – Sangbariya and Tenar <strong>of</strong> Garhwa district during the period <strong>of</strong> 2020 - 22. The<br />
treatmentswere : T1-Farmers Practice (rearing <strong>of</strong> non-descript desi poultry bird), T2 - Divyayan<br />
Red and T3 - Jharsim. Each treatment with 20 birds (15 days old) in 1:1 ratio <strong>of</strong> male and female<br />
were given to farmers.The birds were let loose in the backyard where there was provision <strong>of</strong> free<br />
scavenging during day and shelter at night. The experimental data <strong>of</strong> body weight gain, mortality<br />
rate, egg and meat productivity and economic parameters were taken as per standard norms.<br />
Results<br />
The highest egg productivity and B:C ratio were realized in Divyayan Red as compared to desi<br />
birds, whereas the Diyayan Red and Jharshim were at par with respect to body weight i.e 1.82<br />
and 1.90 kg and net return was 1912 and 1653 respectively but were significantly superior to<br />
desi-non descript breed .Mortality rate <strong>of</strong> 3.1 was also low in Divyayan Red followed by<br />
Jharsimi.e 4.3 as compared to non-descript desi birds which was quite higher i.e. 8.2.The net<br />
income <strong>of</strong> small, marginal and landless poultry farmers was increased due to rearing <strong>of</strong> Divyayan<br />
Red and Jharsim.<br />
Conclusion<br />
The study was concluded that improved variety <strong>of</strong> poultry likeDivyayan Red and Jharsim rearing<br />
under backyard system could serve as an outstanding dual purpose in Garhwa district <strong>of</strong><br />
Jharkhand, due toits ability for faster growth, better weight gain, faster sexual maturity, low<br />
mortality, better egg production and good adaptability nature. The net income <strong>of</strong> farmers was also<br />
increased due to rearing <strong>of</strong> these improved variety <strong>of</strong> poultry under low input and high output<br />
pursuit within a very short span <strong>of</strong> timeand has better acceptability in poultry farming community<br />
and better adaptability to agro- climatic conditions in Garhwa district <strong>of</strong> Jharkhand.<br />
Assessment <strong>of</strong> Performance <strong>of</strong> Divyayan Red and Jharsim Poultry in Backyard System (<br />
n=20)<br />
Treatment<br />
Av. Body wt.<br />
at 15-day old<br />
chicks<br />
(Kg/bird)<br />
Av. Age<br />
<strong>of</strong> sexual<br />
maturity<br />
(Days)<br />
Av. Body<br />
wt. <strong>of</strong> male<br />
& female at<br />
40 weeks <strong>of</strong><br />
age<br />
(Kg/bird)<br />
Av. Egg<br />
production/<br />
bird/at 72<br />
weeks<br />
(Nos)<br />
Mortality<br />
Rate (%)<br />
Gross<br />
Return (Rs/<br />
bird/annum)<br />
Net return<br />
(Rs/bird/annum)<br />
T1: Farmers 0.096 195.25 1.32 75.21 8.2 1341 1091 2.31<br />
Practice :<br />
Non- descript<br />
Poultry<br />
T2: Divyayan 0.135 174.27 1.82 165.29 3.1 2377 1912 5.19<br />
Red Poultry<br />
T3: Jharsim 0.140 172.30 1.90 140.35 4.3 2123 1653 4.60<br />
Poultry<br />
SEm (0.05) 15.3 18.4 0.139 7.43 0.875 144 138<br />
CD % 32.6 20.8 0.38 18.4 2.26 292 270<br />
Note : Egg Rs. 12/egg Poultry meat - 350/Kg<br />
B:C<br />
Ratio<br />
184 | Page<br />
Ecosystem based approaches for climate change adaptation, ecosystem services, integrated farming system models,<br />
Land degradation neutrality
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
References<br />
Kisku, J., Oraon, J., Pandey, A.K., Singh, B.K. and Chandraker, K. 2019. Study <strong>of</strong> Adoption<br />
Level and Constraints Faced by Rural Women in Backyard Poultry Farming. J.<br />
Agri. Search. 6 (special ): 101-103.<br />
Choudhary, R.K., Roy, M.K., and Sohan, R.K., 2019. Livelihood upliftment <strong>of</strong> Tribal<br />
Farmers through Backyard Poultry Farming Intervention in Kishanganj district <strong>of</strong><br />
Bihar.J. Agri.Search. 6, (Special): 90-92.<br />
Shekhar, S., Sanjay Kumar, and Rajni Kumari. 2020. Comparative Performance <strong>of</strong> Divyayan<br />
Red and Local Desi birds under Backyard Farming in Koderma District <strong>of</strong><br />
Jharkhand India. J. Agri. Search, 7,2: 93-96.<br />
T2-18P-1251<br />
Challenges in Contemporary Indian agriculture: Integrated Farming<br />
Systems (IFS) for Transformation<br />
Marneni Divya Sree * , M. J. Mercykutty and Rose Mathews<br />
College <strong>of</strong> Agriculture, Kerala Agricultural University, Vellanikkara, Thrissur, Kerala, India-<br />
680656.<br />
*marnenidivyasree@gmail.com<br />
The green revolution in the 1960s was characterized by the cultivation <strong>of</strong> high-yielding<br />
varieties and the application <strong>of</strong> more intensive farming techniques, which transformed the<br />
agricultural landscape in the developing world. After the green revolution, cereal crop<br />
production in India increased dramatically. India is the world's second-largest wheat and rice<br />
producer, with 100.42 Million Tonnes and 112.44 Million Tonnes <strong>of</strong> production respectively<br />
in 2020-21 (GoI, 2021). However, its non-sustainable nature coupled with limited scope and<br />
subsequent impacts on the ecosystem has led to a quest for a more sustainable and greener<br />
alternative. With this backdrop, the objectives are framed as 1. To identify the challenges <strong>of</strong><br />
contemporary Indian agriculture. 2. To identify the scope and importance <strong>of</strong> Integrated<br />
farming systems in India<br />
Methodology<br />
Data regarding stunted and wasted children was taken from UNICEF, 2019. The data<br />
regarding the average size <strong>of</strong> landholding and no. <strong>of</strong> holdings across all size groups was taken<br />
from GoI, 2016.<br />
Ecosystem based approaches for climate change adaptation, ecosystem services, integrated farming system<br />
models, Land degradation neutrality<br />
185 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Results<br />
To identify the challenges <strong>of</strong> contemporary Indian agriculture<br />
Though India has achieved self-sufficiency in food production, there area few challenges in<br />
the contemporary scenario like the sustainability <strong>of</strong> agricultural production systems and<br />
national food security. Impacts <strong>of</strong> climate change and soil degradation in the recent past. The<br />
increasing awareness <strong>of</strong> nutrition leading to dietary diversification is demanding widespread<br />
changes in cropping patterns. The shortage <strong>of</strong> regular access to sufficient, safe, and nutritious<br />
food, resulted in hunger and malnutrition. It is reported that during 2016-2018, around 31 per<br />
cent <strong>of</strong> the world’s stunted and 51 per cent <strong>of</strong> wasted children were in India (UNICEF,<br />
2019). The average size <strong>of</strong> land holding has come down from 2.28 ha. in 1970-71 to 1.08 ha.<br />
in 2015-16 (Fig) (GoI, 2016). This declining trend in the size <strong>of</strong> land holding and increasing<br />
no. <strong>of</strong> marginal and smallholder farmers poses a serious challenge to the sustainability and<br />
pr<strong>of</strong>itability <strong>of</strong> farming. This situation calls for an integrated effort to address the emerging<br />
livelihood issues.<br />
Figure 1<br />
2.5<br />
2<br />
1.5<br />
1<br />
0.5<br />
0<br />
1970-71 1980-81 1990-91 2000-01 2010-11 2015-16<br />
Average size <strong>of</strong> landholding (in hectares)<br />
To identify the scope and importance <strong>of</strong> Integrated farming systems in India<br />
There is a possibility for our food system to provide everyone with enough food for a healthy<br />
life, while maintaining a healthy environment, with the sustainable intensification <strong>of</strong><br />
agriculture, collaborative, and inclusive policymaking. For sustainable intensification <strong>of</strong><br />
agriculture Integrated farming system is the leading pathway. The adoption <strong>of</strong> different<br />
farming systems is considered the most powerful tool for enhancing the pr<strong>of</strong>itability <strong>of</strong> small<br />
and marginal farmers, with considerable scope for resource recycling and the concept <strong>of</strong><br />
ecological soundness leading to sustainable agriculture (FAO, 2022).<br />
The farming system approach is not only a reliable way <strong>of</strong> obtaining fairly high productivity<br />
with considerable scope for resource recycling but also a concept <strong>of</strong> ecological soundness<br />
leading to sustainable agriculture. With the increasing energy crisis due to the shrinking <strong>of</strong><br />
186 | Page<br />
Ecosystem based approaches for climate change adaptation, ecosystem services, integrated farming system models,<br />
Land degradation neutrality
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
non-renewable fossil-fuel-based sources, the fertilizer nutrient cost has been increasing<br />
steeply. This would leave the farmers with no option but to fully explore the potential<br />
alternate sources <strong>of</strong> nutrients for individual crops and in the cropping systems.<br />
Conclusion<br />
It can be concluded that in diversified farming, the thrust is mainly to minimize the risk,<br />
while in such situations a judicious mix <strong>of</strong> one or more enterprises along with cropping, there<br />
exist a complimentary effect through effective recycling <strong>of</strong> wastes and crop residues which<br />
encompasses an additional source <strong>of</strong> income to the farmer.<br />
References<br />
FAO [Food and Agriculture Organization]. 2022. Indian agriculture towards 2030. Rome,<br />
322p.<br />
GOI [Government <strong>of</strong> India]. 2016. All India report on Agriculture Census. Ministry <strong>of</strong><br />
Agriculture and Farmers Welfare, New Delhi, 26p.<br />
GOI [Government <strong>of</strong> India]. 2021. Agricultural statistics at a glance. Ministry <strong>of</strong> Agriculture<br />
and Farmers Welfare, New Delhi, 142p.<br />
UNICEF [United Nations International Children’s Emergency Fund]. 2019. The state <strong>of</strong> the<br />
world’s children 2019, Children, food, and nutrition: growing well in a changing<br />
world. New York, 39p.<br />
Ecosystem based approaches for climate change adaptation, ecosystem services, integrated farming system<br />
models, Land degradation neutrality<br />
T2-19P-1268<br />
Productivity and Pr<strong>of</strong>itability <strong>of</strong> Different Rabi Crops in Maize Based<br />
Cropping Systems under Rainfed Subtropics <strong>of</strong> Jammu<br />
Rohit Shrama 1* , A.P. Singh 1 , G. Ravindrachary 2 , K.A. Gopinath 2 , Jai Kumar 1 , Brinder<br />
Singh 1 , and Sunny Raina 1<br />
1 All India Coordinated Project for Dryland agriculture, Rakh-Dhiansar, Samba (UT <strong>of</strong> J & K)<br />
Sher-e-Kashmir University <strong>of</strong> Agricultural Sciences and Technology <strong>of</strong> Jammu, RakhDhiansar,<br />
Jammu, Jammu and Kashmir (UT) 181 133<br />
2 ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad,<br />
* rohit_agros@rediffmail.com<br />
Globally maize is grown on an area <strong>of</strong> about 197.19 million hectares with production <strong>of</strong><br />
1125.03 million tones and the average productivity is 5.71 tha -1 . In India, it is cultivated on an<br />
area <strong>of</strong> 9.21 million hectare with production <strong>of</strong> 25.13 million tones and productivity <strong>of</strong> 2.63<br />
tha -1 (Anonymous, 2020). In J&K Union Territory, maize is grown on an area <strong>of</strong><br />
about262.35thousand hectares with a production <strong>of</strong> 5744thousand tones and productivity <strong>of</strong>2.12 t<br />
ha -1 (Anonymous, 2019). Agriculture in Jammu and Kashmir is characterized by marginal and<br />
187 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
small farm holdings with average operational land holding size <strong>of</strong> 0.7 ha which is further<br />
dwindling owing to fragmentation because <strong>of</strong> expanding family size and diversion <strong>of</strong> agricultural<br />
land to other uses. The predominant rainfed cropping system in the region is maize-wheat and<br />
being cereal-cereal system, it is threatening the soil fertility and yield sustainability apart from<br />
adversely affecting the economic returns. Growing <strong>of</strong> large number <strong>of</strong> crops is practiced in<br />
rainfed lands to reduce the risk factor <strong>of</strong> crop failures due to drought or irregular rains. Moreover,<br />
diversification <strong>of</strong> crops can s<strong>of</strong>ten impacts on environmental resources and is considered to be<br />
more remunerative, better input use efficient and less risk prone. Growing <strong>of</strong> different rabi crops<br />
in maize-based cropping system can maintain soil fertility and sustain crop productivity.<br />
Methodology<br />
A field experiment was carried out at research farm <strong>of</strong> Advanced Centre for rainfed agriculture,<br />
Rakh Dhiansar, Sher-e-Kashmir University <strong>of</strong> Agricultural Sciences and Technology <strong>of</strong> Jammu<br />
during 2020-21.An experiment comprises <strong>of</strong> nine maize based cropping systems viz: Maize-<br />
Wheat, Maize- Chickpea, Maize- Lentil, Maize- Gobhisarson, Maize- Linseed, Maize-Barley,<br />
Maize-Taramira, Maize-Oat, Maize-Field pea were tested in randomized block design under<br />
sandy loam soil having slightly acidic in nature, well drained low in carbon, (0.22), low in<br />
available nitrogen (162 kgha -1 ) and potassium (102 kgha -1 ) and medium in available phosphorous<br />
(14.4 kg ha -1 ). All the crops in different cropping systems were raised in accordance with the<br />
recommended package <strong>of</strong> practices and technical programme.<br />
Results<br />
Evaluation <strong>of</strong> different maize-based cropping systems during rabi 2020-21under rainfed<br />
conditions.<br />
Treatment<br />
Grain<br />
yield (kg<br />
ha -1 )<br />
WEY<br />
(kg ha -1 )<br />
COC<br />
(Rs ha -1 )<br />
Net<br />
Returns<br />
(Rs. ha -1 )<br />
B:C<br />
Ratio<br />
RWUE<br />
(kg ha -1 -<br />
mm)<br />
T1 Maize-Wheat 2618 2618 23200 44528 2.92 23.42<br />
T2 Maize- Chickpea 668 2029 18800 21280 2.13 18.15<br />
T3 Maize- Lentil 740 1896 16700 20740 2.24 16.96<br />
T4 Maize-Gobhisarson 1003 2362 17000 29640 2.74 21.12<br />
T5 Maize- Linseed 587 1783 16200 19020 2.17 15.95<br />
T6 Maize-Barley 2490 2143 22000 20330 1.92 19.17<br />
T7 Maize-Taramira 602 1676 16000 17110 2.07 15.00<br />
T8 Maize-Oat 28500 1587 15800 15550 1.98 14.20<br />
T9 Maize-Field pea 710 2157 18600 24000 2.29 19.29<br />
CD (5%) - 228.7 - - - -<br />
Among the different crops sown under different cropping systems during rabi 2020-21,<br />
wheat crop reported significantly highest wheat equivalent yield to the tune <strong>of</strong> 2618 kgha -1<br />
188 | Page<br />
Ecosystem based approaches for climate change adaptation, ecosystem services, integrated farming system models,<br />
Land degradation neutrality
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
under maize-wheat cropping system with the corresponding highest values <strong>of</strong> net returns, B:C<br />
ratio and RWUE <strong>of</strong> Rs. 44528ha -1 , 2.92, and 23.43 kgha -1 -mm, which was found statistically<br />
at par with Gobhisarson having yield <strong>of</strong> 2362kgha -1 with the corresponding values <strong>of</strong> net<br />
returns, B:C ratio and RWUE <strong>of</strong> Rs. 29640ha -1 , 2.74, and 21.12 kgha -1 -mm, respectively<br />
under maize-gobhisarson cropping system. While the lowest wheat equivalent yield <strong>of</strong> 1587<br />
kgha -1 was registered in oats (fodder) under maize-oats (fodder) system with net returns, B:C<br />
ratio and RWUE <strong>of</strong> Rs. 15550ha -1 , 1.98, and 14.20 kgha -1 -mm, respectively. Tripathi et al.,<br />
1998 reported similar findings <strong>of</strong> MEY in maize-based cropping sequence.<br />
Conclusion<br />
Based on one year preliminarily observation, it may be concluded that maize wheat system<br />
was found to be superior among the other systems in terms <strong>of</strong> equivalent yield, net returns,<br />
B:C ratio and rain water use efficiency under rainfed conditions <strong>of</strong> Jammu.<br />
References<br />
Anonymous, 2019. Digest <strong>of</strong> Statistics 2018-19. Government <strong>of</strong> Jammu and Kashmir, finance<br />
department, directorate <strong>of</strong> economics and statistics. Available at:<br />
http://ecostatjk.nic.in/digeststat/DOS-2018-19-Final. Accessed on 19 June, 2022.<br />
Anonymous, 2020. World agricultural production, United States department <strong>of</strong> agriculture. Available<br />
at: https://apps.fas.usda.gov/psdonline/circulars/production.<br />
Jamwal J S. 2000. Production potential and economics <strong>of</strong> different crop sequence in rainfed areas <strong>of</strong><br />
Jammu. Ind. J. Agrn. 45 (2): 269-273.<br />
Tripathi S C, Chauhan D S, Sharma R K, Dhillon O P. 1998. Productivity and economics <strong>of</strong> different<br />
wheat (Triticum aectivum) based cropping sequence. Ind. J. Agrn. 44(2): 237-241.<br />
T2-20P-1278<br />
Pr<strong>of</strong>itability <strong>of</strong> Rajmah based Intercropping System under Rainfed Upland<br />
Situation <strong>of</strong> Assam<br />
Nikhilesh Baruah, Nupur Kalita, Pallab Kumar Sarma, Bikram Borkotoki, Arunjyoti<br />
Sonowal, Rekhashree Kalita, and G. Ravindrachary<br />
AICRP on Dryland Agriculture Biswanath College <strong>of</strong> Agriculture, Assam Agricultural<br />
University, Biswanath Chariali, Assam-784176, India<br />
Rajmah (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) is one <strong>of</strong> the most important pulse crops grown all over the<br />
country. In Assam, it is an important prospective and pr<strong>of</strong>it-earning rabi crops more<br />
particularly in Borak valley Zone <strong>of</strong> Assam. Due to presence <strong>of</strong> high amount <strong>of</strong> nutrients, it<br />
is called as “king <strong>of</strong> nutrition”. It is grown for seed as well as green vegetable due to good<br />
sources <strong>of</strong> vitamins and minerals. Generally, most <strong>of</strong> the pulse crops including rajmah are<br />
grown as a mono crop in the farmer’s field. There is scope for intercropping in rajmah which<br />
Ecosystem based approaches for climate change adaptation, ecosystem services, integrated farming system<br />
models, Land degradation neutrality<br />
189 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
may lead to higher pr<strong>of</strong>it, may act as crop insurance against adverse weather conditions,<br />
meeting the diversification <strong>of</strong> crops and maximizing land use efficiency through efficient use<br />
<strong>of</strong> resources like moisture, nutrients and light, stabilizing the yield through risk minimization<br />
<strong>of</strong> crop failure and reduced pest and disease problems. (Coll et al., 2012), Therefore<br />
Intercropping <strong>of</strong> rajmah with other crops may be additional advantage for the farmers under<br />
rainfed situations. Considering the fact, the rajmah based intercropping with four rabi crops<br />
(toria, linseed, lentil and buckwheat) was undertaken for evaluation at AICRP for Dryland<br />
Agriculture, BN College <strong>of</strong> Agriculture, AAU, Biswanath Chariali, Assam for three years<br />
starting from rabi season <strong>of</strong> 2018-19 to 2020-21.<br />
Methodology<br />
The field experiment was conducted at the experimental field <strong>of</strong> All India Coordinated<br />
Research Project for Dryland Agriculture, Biswanath College <strong>of</strong> Agriculture, Biswanath<br />
Chariali, Assam Agricultural University, during the rabi season <strong>of</strong> 2018-19, 2019-20 and<br />
2020-21 in randomized block design. The texture <strong>of</strong> the soil <strong>of</strong> the experimental field was<br />
sandy loam with a pH <strong>of</strong> 4.98 and organic carbon <strong>of</strong> 0.58%. The soil was medium in<br />
available nitrogen (330.10 Kg ha -1 ), available phosphorus (23.26 Kg ha -1 ), and available<br />
potassium (171.35 Kg ha -1 ). The rajmah based intercropping was evaluated in a randomized<br />
block design with 13 treatment combinations involving three (3) replication. The treatments<br />
consisted <strong>of</strong> T 1 - Rajmah Sole, T 2 - Toria Sole, T 3 – Linseed Sole, T 4 – Lentil sole, T 5 –<br />
Buckwheat sole, T6- Rajmah + Toria (1:1), T7 -Rajmah + linseed (1:1), T8 - Rajmah + lentil<br />
(1:1), T 9- Rajmah + buckwheat (1:1),T 10-Rajmah + toria (2:1), T 11- Rajmah+ linseed (2:1),<br />
T12 -Rajmah + lentil(2:1) and T13 - Rajmah + buckwheat (2:1). The individual plot size was 20<br />
m 2 (5m x 4m) and the variety selected for rajmah was ‘Arun’, TS-38 for toria, T-397 for<br />
linseed, KLS-218 for lentil, and local variety for buckwheat. The seed rate <strong>of</strong> rajmah, toria,<br />
linseed, lentil, and buckwheat were 75 kg ha -1 , 10 kg ha -1 , 20 kg ha -1 , 30 kg ha -1 , and 20 kg<br />
ha -1 respectively. The experimental plot was ploughed by tractor-drawn plough followed by<br />
harrowing and laddering. Rows were prepared for sowing manually at 30cm and plant-toplant<br />
distance was kept at 10cm. The fertilizer was applied as per recommendation <strong>of</strong> the<br />
package <strong>of</strong> practices <strong>of</strong> Assam in terms <strong>of</strong> Urea, SSP, and MOP. The crops were sown in the<br />
field within second to third week <strong>of</strong> each year. Weekly meteorological data in standard<br />
meteorological week (SMW) during the period <strong>of</strong> experimentation was collected at the<br />
meteorological observatory <strong>of</strong> the department <strong>of</strong> agricultural meteorology, Biswanath College<br />
<strong>of</strong> Agriculture, Assam Agricultural University, Biswanath Chariali. The yield <strong>of</strong> the<br />
intercrops was converted to rajmah equivalent and comparison among the intercropping<br />
systems were made accordingly.<br />
Results<br />
190 | Page<br />
Ecosystem based approaches for climate change adaptation, ecosystem services, integrated farming system models,<br />
Land degradation neutrality
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
The growth and yield attributing characters and yield <strong>of</strong> the crops. As the bio-metric parameters<br />
and structural make up as well as morphology <strong>of</strong> the intercrops species differ widely due to their<br />
genetic variations, statistical analysis <strong>of</strong> the intercrops were not done and only average value was<br />
given in the Table.<br />
Equivalent yield <strong>of</strong> the system: The rajmah equivalent yields <strong>of</strong> the different intercropping<br />
system were calculated for each year individually and pooled analysis was done. The study<br />
revealed that rajmah + lentil (1:1) ratio was the best treatment showing highest yield <strong>of</strong> 13.48 q<br />
ha -1 which was at par with Rajmah +linseed (2:1): Rajmah +linseed (1:1) and Rajmah +lentil<br />
(2:1) with a system yield <strong>of</strong> 12.83 qha -1 , 12.66 qha -1 and 12.59 qha -1 , respectively. The toria nad<br />
buckwheat was not performing well with rajmah in both 1:1 and 2:1 ratio. For measuring <strong>of</strong><br />
biological efficiency <strong>of</strong> the intercropping, land equivalent ratio (LER) was calculated and it was<br />
found that, linseed and lentil was more beneficial and economical as intercrop as compared to<br />
toria and buckwheat.<br />
The economics <strong>of</strong> different intercropping system was also calculated in terms <strong>of</strong> gross return, net<br />
return and B:C ratio. Among the intercropping system <strong>of</strong> lentil and linseed, both the ratio <strong>of</strong> 1:1<br />
ratio and 2:1 ratio is showing the B:C ratio more than 2 with a value <strong>of</strong> 2.58, 2.54, 2.50 and 2.50<br />
each in rajmah +linseed (2:1), rajmah +lentil (1:1), rajmah +linseed (1:1) and rajmah +lentil (2:1),<br />
respectively. The results can be supported by findings noted by Tripathi et al. where maize +<br />
cowpea-wheat combination was the most productive and economic intercrop combination, with<br />
an increase in net economic return (43.63%) and B: C ratio <strong>of</strong> 1.94.<br />
Conclusion<br />
Among the five different rabi crops studied to assess the best intercrops with rajmah it has been<br />
seen that lentil and linseed was found to be more efficient and pr<strong>of</strong>itable than toria and<br />
buckwheat. The highest land equivalent ratio, equivalent yield, and monetary advantage were<br />
recorded in the rajmah + linseed intercropping <strong>of</strong> 2:1 ratio. The rajmah crop was not performing<br />
well when intercropped with toria and buckwheat which is mainly due to the more height <strong>of</strong> the<br />
intercrops resulting competition for light and others more particularly at early stage <strong>of</strong> growth <strong>of</strong><br />
the main crop rajmah.<br />
References<br />
Coll, L., Cerrudo, A., Rizzalli, R., Monzon, J. P. and Andrade, F. H. 2012. Capture and use <strong>of</strong><br />
water and radiation in summer intercrops in the south-east Pampas <strong>of</strong> Argentina. Field<br />
Crops Research. 134: 105-113<br />
Tripathi, S. C., Venkatesh, K., Meena, R. P., Chander, S., & Singh, G. P., (2021). Sustainable<br />
intensification <strong>of</strong> maize and wheat cropping system through pulse intercropping,<br />
Scientific Reports, 11(1), 1-10.<br />
Ecosystem based approaches for climate change adaptation, ecosystem services, integrated farming system<br />
models, Land degradation neutrality<br />
191 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA,<br />
Hyderabad<br />
Growth, yield attributes and yields <strong>of</strong> the main and intercrops <strong>of</strong> the different intercropping system<br />
Treatments<br />
Plant height<br />
(cm)<br />
Cyme/siliqua<br />
pod/plant<br />
Test weight.(g) Main crop yield (qha -1 ) Intercrop yield (qha -1 )<br />
rajmah Intercrop rajmah Intercrop rajmah intercrop 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 Pooled 2018-<br />
19<br />
2019-<br />
20<br />
2020-21 Pooled<br />
T 1: Sole Rajmah 44.67 - 19.69 - 317.62 - 13.00 14.33 13.34 13.55 - - -<br />
T 2: Sole toria - 69.64 - 57.91 - 3.67 12.00 12.67 11.84 12.17 - - -<br />
T 3: Sole linseed - 46.02 - 24.30 - 5.11 7.83 6.67 6.60 7.03 - - -<br />
T 4: Sole lentil - 25.0 - 24.60 - 14.27 4.73 5.33 4.94 5.02 - - -<br />
T 5 : Sole buckwheat - 72.63 - 27.80 - 18.60 6.43 14.83 13.39 11.72 - - -<br />
T 6 : Rajmah +toria (1:1) 47.27 73.69 11.81 48.20 312.57 3.28 3.33 3.27 3.24 3.28 8.83 9.03 10.67 9.84<br />
T 7: Rajmah+linseed (1:1) 43.07 45.17 15.25 23.87 315.74 4.50 8.33 10.00 9.64 9.32 5.67 5.00 5.10 5.26<br />
T 8: Rajmah +lentil (1:1) 44.67 19.50 16.50 19.19 316.83 13.88 8.83 10.67 8.67 9.40 3.83 2.83 3.40 3.35<br />
T 9: Rajmah+buckwheat 44.84 81.22 13.67 31.24 316.15 11.72<br />
9.67<br />
4.10<br />
5.13 7.67<br />
(1:1)<br />
4.17 4.17<br />
4.14<br />
7.49<br />
T 10: Rajmah +toria (2:1) 42.10 69.33 14.34 41.75 312.56 3.32 4.83 3.67 4.10 4.27 7.67 8.50 8.14 8.10<br />
T 11: Rajmah +linseed (2:1) 44.00 46.57 18.48 32.98 316.12 4.98 9.50 10.83 11.20 10.51 3.93 3.67 4.20 3.94<br />
T 12: Rajmah +lentil (2:1) 46.12 20.93 13.20 24.27 316.24 13.56 9.17 9.83 9.54 9.52 3.43 2.27 2.96 2.90<br />
T 13:<br />
(2:1)<br />
Rajmah+buckwheat 44.10 83.02 12.96 34.80 316.11 12.30<br />
7.70<br />
5.17<br />
4.50 5.40<br />
5.83 5.33<br />
5.44<br />
5.87<br />
CD at 5% NS - NS - NS - - - - - - - - -<br />
Ecosystem based approaches for climate change adaptation, ecosystem services, integrated farming system models, Land degradation neutrality<br />
192 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-<br />
CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Rajmah Equivalent Yield (REY) , Land Equivalent Ratio (LER) and Rain Water Use Efficiency (RWUE) <strong>of</strong> the system<br />
Treatments REY (qha -1 ) LER RWUE (Kgha -1 mm)<br />
2018 2019 2020 Pooled 2018 2019 2020 pooled 2018 2019 2020 Pooled<br />
T 1: Sole Rajmah 13.00 14.33 13.34 13.56 1 1 1 1 8.56 10.07 11.47 10.03<br />
T 2: Sole toria 8.00 8.44 7.89 8.11 1 1 1 1 5.27 5.93 6.76 5.98<br />
T 3: Sole linseed 5.22 4.44 4.40 4.68 1 1 1 1 3.44 3.12 3.56 3.37<br />
T 4: Sole lentil 5.52 6.22 5.64 5.56 1 1 1 1 3.64 4.37 4.98 4.33<br />
T 5: Sole buckwheat 5.36 12.36 8.05 8.55 1 1 1 1 3.53 8.68 9.89 7.37<br />
T 6: Rajmah +toria (1:1) 10.56 11.16 11.01 10.91 1.09 1.16 1.14 1.13 6.95 7.83 8.92 7.90<br />
T 7: Rajmah +linseed (1:1) 12.11 13.33 12.55 12.66 1.52 1.41 1.49 1.48 7.97 9.36 10.67 9.33<br />
T 8: Rajmah +lentil (1:1) 13.30 13.97 13.18 13.48 1.53 1.38 1.32 1.37 8.76 9.81 11.18 9.92<br />
T 9: Rajmah +buckwheat (1:1) 8.45 12.22 11.72 10.79 1.14 1.10 1.02 1.03 5.56 8.58 9.78 7.97<br />
T 10: Rajmah +toria (2:1) 9.94 9.33 9.5 9.59 0.93 0.95 0.98 0.97 6.55 6.55 7.47 6.86<br />
T 11: Rajmah +linseed (2:1) 12.12 13.28 13.1 12.83 1.62 1.38 1.46 1.46 7.98 9.32 10.62 9.31<br />
T 12:Rajmah +lentil (2:1) 13.18 12.48 12.14 12.59 1.48 1.25 1.30 1.29 8.67 8.76 9.98 9.14<br />
T 13:Rajmah+buckwheat (2:1) 8.83 10.56 10.32 9.90 1.17 1.08 0.95 1.00 5.82 7.41 8.44 7.22<br />
CD at 5% 1.29 1.65 1.40 2.38 - - - - - - - -<br />
Ecosystem based approaches for climate change adaptation, ecosystem services, integrated farming system models, Land degradation neutrality<br />
193 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA,<br />
Hyderabad<br />
Treatments<br />
COC<br />
(Rs. ha -1 )<br />
Economics <strong>of</strong> the different rajmah based intercropping system<br />
Gross return (Rs. ha -1 ) Net return (Rs. ha -1 ) B:C ratio<br />
2018 2019 2020 pooled 2018 2019 2020 pooled 2018 2019 2020 pooled<br />
T 1: Sole Rajmah 29880 78000 85980 80040 81340 48120 56100 50160 51460 2.61 2.87 2.67 2.71<br />
T 2: Sole toria 20670 48000 50640 47340 48660 27330 29970 26670 27990 2.32 2.44 2.29 2.35<br />
T 3: Sole linseed 20200 31320 26640 26400 28120 11120 6440 6200 7920 1.55 1.31 1.30 1.38<br />
T 4: Sole lentil 20770 33120 37320 29640 33360 12350 16550 8870 12590 1.59 1.79 1.42 1.60<br />
T 5: Sole buckwheat 19120 32160 54150 56950 47753 13040 35030 37830 28633 1.68 2.83 2.97 2.49<br />
T 6: Rajmah +toria (1:1) 30355 63360 66960 66120 65480 33005 36605 35765 35125 2.08 2.20 2.17 2.15<br />
T 7: Rajmah +linseed (1:1) 30680 72660 79980 78240 76960 41980 49300 47560 46280 2.36 2.60 2.55 2.50<br />
T 8: Rajmah +lentil (1:1) 30930 79800 83820 72420 78680 48870 52890 41490 47750 2.58 2.70 2.34 2.54<br />
T 9: Rajmah +buckwheat<br />
(1:1)<br />
30680<br />
50700 73320 72900 65640 20020 42640 42220 34960 1.65 2.38 2.37 2.13<br />
T 10:Rajmah +toria (2:1) 30117 59640 55980 57120 57580 29523 25863 27003 27463 1.98 1.85 1.89 1.90<br />
T 11: Rajmah +linseed (2:1) 30280 72720 79680 82800 78400 42440 49400 52520 48120 2.40 2.63 2.73 2.58<br />
T 12:Rajmah +lentil (2:1) 30405 79080 74880 75000 76320 48675 44475 44595 45915 2.60 2.46 2.46 2.50<br />
T 13:Rajmah<br />
(2:1)<br />
+buckwheat<br />
30280<br />
52980 63360 69480 61940 22700 33080 39200 31660 1.74 2.09 2.29 2.04<br />
Ecosystem based approaches for climate change adaptation, ecosystem services, integrated farming system models, Land degradation neutrality<br />
194 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
T2-21P-1292<br />
Effect <strong>of</strong> Sowing Windows on Production <strong>of</strong> rabi Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor<br />
L.) in Scarcity Zone <strong>of</strong> Maharashtra<br />
V. T. Jadhav*, V. M. Londhe, J. D. Jadhav and V. M. Amrutsagar<br />
Mahatma Phule Krishi Vidyapeeth, Rahuri,<br />
All India Coordinated Research Project on Agrometeorology,<br />
Zonal Agriculture Research Station, Solapur, Maharashtra. 413 002<br />
*vtj2009@rediffmail.com<br />
Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.,) plays an important role as a grain and fodder crop for both arid<br />
and semi-arid regions <strong>of</strong> the world. This importance is due to its higher water use efficiency,<br />
relatively good tolerance to drought and salt stresses, and good competitiveness with weeds in<br />
advanced growth stages. Sorghum growth, development, and yield depends on environmental<br />
conditions as temperature and precipitation. Deciding on early or late planting depends on a<br />
farmer’s ability to deal with the risk <strong>of</strong> poor crop establishment with early planting or the effect<br />
<strong>of</strong> water or heat stress at reproductive stages with late planting. Since sorghum is cultivated<br />
majorly as a rainfed crop, its productivity is significantly influenced by climatic elements<br />
(Srivastava et al. 2010). Among the cereals in India, sorghum ranks third, next to rice and<br />
wheat. Sorghum is a rich source <strong>of</strong> carbohydrates, proteins, minerals, and vitamins B1 and B2.<br />
Keeping this in view, this experiment was conducted with the objective to study suitable<br />
variety under suitable weather conditions for optimum production and identify the suitable<br />
sowing date for better growth and yield <strong>of</strong> sorghum crop.<br />
Methodology<br />
The experiment was carried out for five years during the rabi season from 2016-17 to 2020-21<br />
at Dry Farming Research Station, Solapur (17.65º N 75º 90’ E and 483.6 m MSL) on medium<br />
black soil (60 cm soil depth). The experiment was laid out in a split-plot design with four<br />
replications. Treatments were comprised <strong>of</strong> four sowing dates i.e. S1: MW 36 (Sept.03-09)<br />
Purva nakshatra, S 2: MW 38 (Sept.17-23) Uttara nakshatra, S 3: MW 40 (Oct.01-07) Hasta<br />
nakshatra, S4: MW 40 (Oct.15-21) Chitra nakshatra. Three sorghum genotypes i.e. V1: M-35-<br />
1, V2: Mauli, and V3: Yashoda were sown at a spacing <strong>of</strong> 45cm×15cm. The sowing <strong>of</strong> seed was<br />
done by dibbling method on the respective date <strong>of</strong> sowing. Recommended packages <strong>of</strong><br />
practices were uniformly followed.<br />
Results<br />
Among all the sowing, dates the crop sown at MW 40 (01-07th Oct) S 3 produced maximum<br />
grain yield (808.29 kg ha -1 ) and total monetary returns (Rs. 26633 ha -1 ) over the rest <strong>of</strong> the<br />
treatments. These results are in concurrence with the findings <strong>of</strong> (Hulihalli et al. 2016). This<br />
Ecosystem based approaches for climate change adaptation, ecosystem services, integrated farming system<br />
models, Land degradation neutrality<br />
195 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
might be due to uneven and inadequate distribution <strong>of</strong> rainfall and moisture during the<br />
vegetative growth period <strong>of</strong> crops. It is also seen that there was a delay in sowing increase in<br />
consistency in grain yield production than the earlier sowing. Among the varieties, M-35-1<br />
produced significantly higher grain yield (717.94 kg ha -1 ) and total monetary returns<br />
(Rs.24968 ha -1 ) over the other variety.<br />
The growth and development <strong>of</strong> crop is influenced by environmental conditions such as<br />
temperature, radiation, and photoperiod (Mokashi et al. 2008). The mean CUM and MUE<br />
recorded by sorghum crop was 240 mm and 2.7 kg ha- 1 mm. The highest CUM was recorded by<br />
S 3 sown crop (258 mm) however the MUE was recorded by S 3 sown crop (3.5 kg ha -1 mm).<br />
This indicated that S 3 sown crop (Hasta Nakshatra) utilized moisture more efficiently than<br />
other dates <strong>of</strong> sowing. The Tmax and Tmin were correlated with the grain yield <strong>of</strong> rabi sorghum.<br />
It showed a polynomial relationship with grain yield. This indicated that with an increase <strong>of</strong><br />
Tmax there was an increase in grain yield upto 31.8 0 C and later on yield decreased with an<br />
increase in Tmax. This indicated that with an increase <strong>of</strong> T min there was an increase in grain<br />
yield up to 17.5 0 C later on yield decreased with an increase in T min.<br />
Pooled grain yield (kg ha -1 ) and total monetary returns (TMR) <strong>of</strong> rabi sorghum as<br />
influenced by sowing dates and varieties 2016 to 2020.<br />
Treatment 2016-<br />
17<br />
Main=Sowing dates<br />
2017-<br />
18<br />
2018-<br />
19<br />
2019-<br />
20<br />
2020-<br />
21<br />
Pooled<br />
yield<br />
Pooled<br />
TMR<br />
S 1 = MW 36 (Sept.03-09) Purva nakshtra 793.9 508.1 516.0 579.1 846.67 648.77 22108<br />
S 2 = MW 38 (Sept.17-23) Uttara nakshtra 897.4 618.2 583.3 701.6 926.92 745.46 25281<br />
S 3 = MW 40 (Oct. 01-07) Hasta nakshtra 1042.4 844.4 677.6 503.5 973.42 808.28 26633<br />
S 4 = MW 42 (Oct.15-21) Chitra nakshtra 480.9 434.0 379.9 357.2 424.24 415.25 14935<br />
Mean 803.7 601.2 539.2 535.4 792.81 654.44 22239<br />
Sub=Varieties<br />
V 1 = Maldandi (M-35-1) 884.3 659.1 594.3 588.5 863.56 717.94 24968<br />
V 2 = Mauli 770.2 573.2 514.8 534.3 801.44 638.79 21756<br />
V 3 = Yashoda 756.4 571.2 508.6 483.3 713.43 606.59 19994<br />
Mean 803.7 601.2 539.2 535.4 792.81 654.44 22239<br />
S.E.+ (Sowing dates) 57.1 44.4 37.02 25.2 27.2 44.5 1352.9<br />
C.D. at 5 % 182.6 142.1 118.45 80.7 87.1 137.1 4168.7<br />
S.E.+ (Varieties) 33.3 23.9 22.16 19.6 23.3 10.3 248.9<br />
C.D. at 5 % 97.1 69.6 64.69 57.3 68.1 29.7 716.9<br />
S.E.+ (SD X V) 66.5 47.7 44.32 39.3 46.7 20.6 497.7<br />
C.D. at 5 % NS NS NS NS NS NS NS<br />
196 | Page<br />
Ecosystem based approaches for climate change adaptation, ecosystem services, integrated farming system models, Land<br />
degradation neutrality
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Conclusion<br />
Among the sowing dates crop sown at 40 MW (S3) recorded a significantly higher yield<br />
(808.29 kg/ha) with TMR. Hasta sown sorghum gets sufficient period for its growth and<br />
reproduction with higher CUM (240 mm), MUE (2.7 kg ha -1 mm), GDD (2984) and RUE (2.72<br />
g MJ -1 ). Positive correlation with Tmax up to 31.8 0 c and Tmin 17.5 0 c. Among varieties, V1<br />
performed significantly better than other varieties under study.<br />
CUM and MUE as influenced by sowing time in rabi sorghum (2016 to 2020).<br />
Sowing CUM (mm) MUE (kg ha -1 mm )<br />
Time M-35-1 Mauli Yashoda Mean M-35-1 Mauli Yashoda Mean<br />
S 1 270 285 290 282 2.7 2.2 2.0 2.3<br />
S 2 240 268 270 259 3.4 2.7 2.6 2.9<br />
S 3 210 240 250 233 4.1 3.3 3.1 3.5<br />
S 4 185 189 192 189 2.5 2.1 2.0 2.2<br />
Mean 226 245 250 240 3.1 2.6 2.4 2.7<br />
GY (Kg/ha)<br />
900<br />
650<br />
Grain yield with CUM in Sorghum<br />
Grain Yield<br />
y = -0.0373x 2 + 15.477x - 737.45<br />
R² = 0.8693<br />
400<br />
100 150 200 250 300 350<br />
CUM (mm)<br />
GY (Kg/ha)<br />
900<br />
650<br />
Grain yield with Tmax in Sorghum<br />
Yield<br />
y = 31254x 2 - 2E+06x + 3E+07<br />
R² = 0.8657<br />
400<br />
31.031.231.431.631.832.032.232.432.632.8<br />
Tmax ( 0 C)<br />
GY (Kg/ha)<br />
Grain Yield<br />
1000<br />
y = 1243.5x 2 - 5234.8x + 5898.6<br />
800 R² = 0.8159<br />
600<br />
400<br />
2.10 2.30 2.50 2.70 2.90<br />
MUE (kg/ha mm)<br />
References<br />
Grain yield with MUE in Sorghum<br />
Hulihalli, U.K., Shantveerayya and Mammigatti, U.V. 2016. Effect <strong>of</strong> Planting Dates and<br />
Correlation studies on Growth and Yield <strong>of</strong> Rabi Sorghum Genotypes. Adv. Life Sci.<br />
5(12).<br />
Ecosystem based approaches for climate change adaptation, ecosystem services, integrated farming system<br />
models, Land degradation neutrality<br />
197 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Mokashi, D.D., Jadhav, J.D, Khadtare, S.V. and Deshpande, A.N. 2008. Crop weather<br />
relationship in rabi sorghum. Internat. J. Agric. Sci. 4 (1).<br />
Srivastava, A., Naresh Kumar, S. and Aggarwal, P.K. 2010. Assessment on vulnerability <strong>of</strong><br />
sorghum to climate change in India, Agric. Ecosyst. Environ.138: 160–169<br />
T2-22P-1302<br />
Effect <strong>of</strong> Sowing Windows on Production <strong>of</strong> Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) in<br />
Scarcity Zone <strong>of</strong> Maharashtra<br />
V. M. Londhe*, V. T. Jadhav, J. D. Jadhav and V. M. Amrutsagar<br />
Mahatma Phule Krishi Vidyapeeth, Rahuri,<br />
All India Coordinated Research Project on Agrometeorology,<br />
Zonal Agriculture Research Station, Solapur 413 002, Maharashtra<br />
*vikaslondhe603@gmail.com<br />
Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) is cultivated for food and fodder on a large scale in arid and<br />
semiarid regions. Chickpea is the second-most important pulse crop after pigeonpea in the<br />
World for human diet and other use. Pulses once referred to as the poor man’s meat is<br />
becoming increasingly important in crop production systems. Poor agronomic practices such as<br />
seed rate, date <strong>of</strong> sowing, selection <strong>of</strong> suitable genotypes, fertilizer management, etc. are<br />
responsible for the low productivity <strong>of</strong> chickpea in India. Within the genetic limits, time <strong>of</strong><br />
sowing is an important agronomic factor affecting the productivity <strong>of</strong> most <strong>of</strong> the arable crops,<br />
owing to changes in environmental conditions to which phenological stages <strong>of</strong> crops are<br />
exposed. Amongst the agronomic practices, sowing methods and proper seed rate are <strong>of</strong> great<br />
importance (Reddy et al., 2003). Generally, chickpea adapts to high temperatures, however,<br />
heat stress during the reproductive phase can cause significant yield loss. with this view, the<br />
present studies were undertaken with the objective <strong>of</strong> predicting the economical yield <strong>of</strong><br />
chickpea in relation to weather parameters.<br />
Methodology<br />
The study was conducted at the research farm <strong>of</strong> Zonal Agricultural Research Station, Solapur,<br />
Mahatma Phule Krishi Vidyapeeth, Rahuri, Maharashtra (India) during the year 2016-2020 in<br />
the rabi season. The experiment was conducted in a split-plot design with four replications.<br />
Treatment combinations were formed considering different cultivars viz., S 1 = MW 38 (Sept<br />
17-23), Uttara nakshatra, S 2 = MW 40 (Oct. 01-07), Hasta nakshatra, S 3 = MW 42 (Oct. 15-<br />
21), Chitra nakshatra and S4 = MW 44 (Oct. 29- Nov.04), Swati nakshatra. Late sowing, after<br />
November 18 reduced yield by 28% for every 10-day interval delay (Paikaray and Misra,<br />
1992).<br />
198 | Page<br />
Ecosystem based approaches for climate change adaptation, ecosystem services, integrated farming system models, Land<br />
degradation neutrality
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Results<br />
Chickpea sown at MW 38 (S 1) (Uttara Nakshatra) produced a significant maximum grain yield<br />
(850.79 kg ha -1 ) and total monetary returns (Rs. 35247 ha -1 ) over S3 and S4 sown crop as<br />
discussed in the table below i.e. MW 42 and 44 (Chitra and Swati Nakshatra). Results are in<br />
close agreement with the finding <strong>of</strong> InduBalaSethi et al, (2016). Variety Digvijay produced<br />
more grain yield (719.87 kg ha -1 ), and total monetary returns (Rs. 29646 ha -1 ) over variety<br />
Vijay. This might be due to the efficient utilization <strong>of</strong> available soil moisture. . Parmar et al.<br />
(2015) revealed that maximum grain yield was recorded from early sown whereas minimum<br />
yield was obtained from the late sown crop <strong>of</strong> chickpea.<br />
The average CUM (288 mm) was recorded higher by the S 1 sown crop (MW 38 (Sept. 17-23),<br />
Uttaranakshatra) and MUE (3.7 kg ha -1 mm) was recorded higher by the S1 sown crop (MW<br />
38 i.e. Uttara sown crop). Among the varieties Digvijay recorded the highest average value <strong>of</strong><br />
CUM and MUE as shown in Table. The yield was decreased if Tmax increases above 31.8 0 C.<br />
The Tmin <strong>of</strong> 18.3 0 C was found to be optimum for getting higher grain yield and thereafter<br />
there was a decrease in chickpea yield.<br />
Pooled grain yield (kg ha -1 ) and total monetary returns (TMR) (Rs ha -1 ) <strong>of</strong> rabi chickpea<br />
as influenced by various sowing dates and varieties. (2016 to 2020)<br />
Treatment 2016-<br />
17<br />
2017-<br />
18<br />
2018-<br />
19<br />
2019-<br />
20<br />
2020-<br />
21<br />
Pooled<br />
Yield<br />
Pooled<br />
TMR<br />
Main=Sowing dates<br />
S 1 = MW 38 (Sept 01-07) Uttara nakshatra 1255.8 660.0 564.5 712.5 1061.2 850.79 35247<br />
S 2 = MW 40 (Oct. 01-07) Hasta nakshatra 1113.1 510.6 467.1 507.9 880.3 695.80 29133<br />
S 3 = MW 42 (Oct. 15-21) Chitra nakshatra 985.6 483.2 413.3 396.5 769.0 609.53 25165<br />
S 4= MW 44 (Oct. 29- Nov.04) Swati nakshatra 812.3 354.5 310.3 342.7 465.9 457.15 18675<br />
Mean 1041.7 502.1 438.8 489.9 794.1 653.32 27055<br />
Sub=Two varieties<br />
V 1 = Vijay 937.1 433.9 371.6 439.7 751.6 586.76 24464<br />
V 2 = Digvijay 1146.3 570.3 506.0 540.1 836.6 719.87 29646<br />
Mean 1041.7 502.1 438.8 489.9 794.1 653.32 27055<br />
S.E.+ (Sowing dates) 25.2 29.1 26.7 40.4 41.4 28.6 1204<br />
C.D. at 5 % 80.6 93.1 85.4 129.2 132.3 88.0 3711<br />
S.E.+ (Varieties) 20.1 19.2 15.7 26.7 27.5 10.4 380.9<br />
C.D. at 5 % 62.0 59.2 48.3 82.2 84.8 31.2 1142.0<br />
S.E.+ (SD X V) 40.2 38.5 31.3 53.4 55.0 20.8 761.8<br />
C.D. at 5 % NS NS NS NS NS NS NS<br />
Ecosystem based approaches for climate change adaptation, ecosystem services, integrated farming system<br />
models, Land degradation neutrality<br />
199 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
CUM and MUE as influenced in chickpea (2016-17 to 2020-21)<br />
Treatment CUM (mm) MUE (kg ha -1 mm) Treatment CUM (mm) MUE(kg ha -1 mm)<br />
S 1V 1 300.8 3.4 S 3V 1 250.2 3.0<br />
S 1V 2 275.2 4.0 S 3V 2 240.0 3.3<br />
S 2V 1 280.0 3.0 S 4V 1 190.8 2.1<br />
S 2V 2 269.8 3.4 S 4V 2 170.2 3.1<br />
Grain yield with CUM in Chickpea<br />
Grain yield with MUE in Chickpea<br />
Grain Yield<br />
Grain Yield<br />
GY (Kg/ha)<br />
y = 0.0058x 2 + 1.9489x - 55.185<br />
R² = 0.8078<br />
GY (Kg/ha)<br />
y = 381.7x - 413.56<br />
R² = 0.7558<br />
CUM (mm)<br />
MUE (kg ha -1 mm)<br />
Grain yield with Tmax in<br />
Chick pea<br />
Grain yield with Tmin in Chickpea<br />
Yield<br />
Yield<br />
GY (Kg/ha)<br />
y = -2037.5x 2 + 130073x - 2E+06<br />
R² = 0.8872<br />
GY (Kg/ha)<br />
y = -52.589x 2 + 1963.9x - 17279<br />
R² = 0.9241<br />
Tmax (°C)<br />
Tmin (⁰C)<br />
Conclusion<br />
Chickpea sown at 38 MW (S1) produced significantly higher yields and total monetary<br />
returns.Among varieties, Digvijay (V 2) recorded higher values than Vijay under study.<br />
References<br />
Indu, B.S., Meena, S., Kumar, P., and Jajoria, M. 2016. Yield performance <strong>of</strong> chickpea<br />
cultivars as influenced by sowing time and seed rate. BioScan. 11(1): 407-409.<br />
Paikaray, R.K., and Misra, R.C. 1992. Performance <strong>of</strong> chickpea under different dates <strong>of</strong> sowing<br />
in the eastern ghat highland zone <strong>of</strong> Orrisa, India. Int. Chickpea News. 27: 24-25.<br />
Reddy, B.V., Reddy, S., Bidinger, P.S., and Blummel, M. 2003. Crop management factors<br />
influencing- yield and quality <strong>of</strong> crop residues. Field Crops Res. 84: 57-77.<br />
Ecosystem based approaches for climate change adaptation, ecosystem services, integrated farming system models, Land<br />
200 | Page<br />
degradation neutrality
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
T2-23P-1315<br />
Effect <strong>of</strong> Thermal Environment on Yield <strong>of</strong> Tomato under Different<br />
Microclimatic Conditions at Upper Brahmaputra Valley Zone <strong>of</strong> Assam<br />
A. Kalia*, P. Neog 1 , R.l. Deka, D. B. Phukan 2 , K.Kurmi 3 and K. Medhi<br />
Department <strong>of</strong> Agrometeorology, Assam Agricultural University, Jorhat- 785013<br />
1 Department <strong>of</strong> Agrometeorology, B. N. College <strong>of</strong> Agriculture, Biswanath Chariali- 784176<br />
2 Department <strong>of</strong> Horticulture, Assam Agricultural University, Jorhat- 785013<br />
3 Department <strong>of</strong> Agronomy, Assam Agricultural University, Jorhat- 785013<br />
* amlanika123@gmail.com<br />
A field experiment was conducted during 2019-20 at AAU, Jorhat to evaluate the effect <strong>of</strong> the<br />
thermal environment on the yield <strong>of</strong> tomato variety Arka Rakshak. The variety was planted on<br />
four planting dates starting from 25 October at 15 days intervals and three mulching treatments<br />
(non-mulch, rice straw mulch, and black polythene) in the split-plot design. The soil<br />
temperatures were recorded daily in twelve plots during the 43 to 12 SMW at two soil depths<br />
<strong>of</strong> 5 cm and 10 cm. Agro-climatic indices viz., growing degree day, Day temperature, and heat<br />
use efficiency (HUE) were calculated following standard procedures. The occurrence <strong>of</strong> lower<br />
daily minimum temperature (
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
In Assam, Tomato is usually grown during the rabi season as a rainfed crop. The soil moisture<br />
fluctuation and low temperature during the critical crop growth stages are the major limiting<br />
factors hindering the growth and yield <strong>of</strong> the tomato crop in Assam. Lowering both soil and air<br />
temperatures below 17ºC during the rabi season in Assam is a common phenomenon, which is<br />
detrimental to the growth and development, and yield <strong>of</strong> the tomato. Moreover, the daily<br />
minimum temperature goes below 10ºC for about two months (Mid -December to Mid -<br />
February), which adversely affects the reproductive stage <strong>of</strong> the tomato crop planted at the<br />
normal time. On the other hand fruit production <strong>of</strong> tomato is gradually dropped as the<br />
temperature increased by the end <strong>of</strong> the winter season. However, these problems can be<br />
nullified up to an extent with the adoption <strong>of</strong> suitable adaptation strategies like microclimatic<br />
modification with alteration <strong>of</strong> planting dates and application <strong>of</strong> mulches. The use <strong>of</strong> mulches<br />
modifies the microclimate <strong>of</strong> the crop by altering not only the soil hydrothermal as well as<br />
radiation regimes at the soil surface and within the crop canopy. Generally, polythene mulches<br />
increase both maximum and minimum soil temperatures (Ham et al., 1993), whereas, organic<br />
mulches decrease maximum but increase minimum soil temperature (Teasdale and Mohler,<br />
1993) as compared to un-mulched soil. Thus, modification <strong>of</strong> the thermal environment for<br />
increasing the yield <strong>of</strong> tomato crops seems to be very important. The study hypothesized that<br />
the mulching and altering dates <strong>of</strong> planting would create a congenial microclimate for matching<br />
growing periods to fit in the required microclimatic conditions and also for better growth,<br />
development, and yield <strong>of</strong> the crop. The investigation was planned to study the effect <strong>of</strong><br />
modified thermal regimes on the yield <strong>of</strong> the Tomato under varying microenvironments.<br />
Methodology<br />
The study was carried out at the Experimental Farm <strong>of</strong> Assam Agricultural University, Jorhat,<br />
Assam (26°42'39" N and 93°15'39" E) during rabi, 2019-20. Tomato cultivar Arka<br />
Rakshak was grown under rainfed conditions in the split-plot design with four dates <strong>of</strong> planting<br />
(P 1: 25th October, P 2: 14 th November, P 3: 3 rd December, and P 4: 8 th January) and three<br />
mulching treatments (M0: Non-mulch, M1: Rice straw mulch and M2: Black polythene). Daily<br />
meteorological data <strong>of</strong> maximum and minimum temperatures during the crop growth period<br />
were collected from the Department <strong>of</strong> the university and converted to weekly values according<br />
to Standard Meteorological Weeks (43 rd to 19 th weeks, 2019-20). Micrometeorological<br />
observations such as daily morning and evening soil temperature were recorded in representing<br />
plots. Growth parameters and phenological observations were recorded periodically. The<br />
accumulation <strong>of</strong> heat unit (GDD) from sowing to the end <strong>of</strong> the harvest and HUE was<br />
computed for different treatments following Medhi et al., (2019). The accumulated Day<br />
temperature during the crop growth period was also calculated following Venkatraman (1968).<br />
The fruit yield at maturity was recorded from a 1 m 2 area from each plot as well as from the<br />
whole plot. Thermal indices were utilized for studying the cause-effect relationship.<br />
202 | Page<br />
Ecosystem based approaches for climate change adaptation, ecosystem services, integrated farming system models, Land<br />
degradation neutrality
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Results<br />
Variation <strong>of</strong> air temperature during the crop growth period:<br />
The variation <strong>of</strong> daily maximum temperatures during the growing period <strong>of</strong> the crop (from 25 th<br />
October 2019 to 12 th May 2020) ranged from 21.7 to 31.7°C with an average temperature and<br />
coefficient <strong>of</strong> variation <strong>of</strong> 26.7°C and 11.7 percent, respectively. The weekly maximum<br />
temperature recorded in the second week <strong>of</strong> the crop season was 30.4°C, which reduced<br />
continuously and reached the minimum <strong>of</strong> 20.7°C during 1 st SMW. Thereafter, the weekly<br />
maximum temperature started to increase and reached a maximum value <strong>of</strong> 31.7°C during the<br />
13 th standard week. It was observed that the daily maximum temperature never exceeded<br />
34.6°C during the crop growth period and always remained lower than the maximum cardinal<br />
temperature (38°C). However, increasing the daily maximum temperature above 30°C after<br />
mid-March (11 SMW) was detrimental to the growth and yield <strong>of</strong> the crop as it was well above<br />
the optimum cardinal temperature <strong>of</strong> 18 to 24°C <strong>of</strong> the crop.<br />
The mean daily minimum temperatures during different standard meteorological weeks in the<br />
crop growing season varied from 8.4°C to 20.8°C at 2 nd SMW and 19 th SMW, respectively.<br />
From the 45thSMW onwards, the minimum temperature decreased gradually and attained the<br />
minimum value <strong>of</strong> 8.4°C at 52 nd SMW, thereafter, it increased gradually and became 20.8°C at<br />
18 th SMW. It was observed that the mean daily minimum temperature during the first week <strong>of</strong><br />
December to the first week <strong>of</strong> February remained below 10°C, with the maximum limit <strong>of</strong><br />
6.2°C, which was even lower than the base temperature (7°C) <strong>of</strong> the crop.<br />
Variation <strong>of</strong> soil temperature under different microclimates<br />
The weekly mean morning and evening soil temperatures ranged from 11.4 to 23.7°Cand 15.1<br />
to 34.5°C, respectively under different planting dates and mulching treatments (Fig. 1). The<br />
highest morning soil temperatures with a weekly mean <strong>of</strong> 16.9°C were recorded under P1,<br />
which reduced gradually with successive delay in planting with the mean morning soil<br />
temperatures <strong>of</strong> 15.7 (P 2), 15.3 (P 3) and 14.9°C (P 4). The highest and the lowest mean evening<br />
soil temperature <strong>of</strong> 26.3°C and 23.6°Cwere recorded under P1 and P2, respectively. Like<br />
morning soil temperature, evening weekly average soil temperatures reduced gradually in the<br />
last two dates <strong>of</strong> plantings (P 3 and P 4). As expected in all planting dates irrespective <strong>of</strong> the<br />
mulching treatments, both weekly morning and evening soil temperatures started to decline<br />
from 47 th SMW and became the minimum between 1stto 3 rd SMW, thereafter it started to<br />
increase gradually towards the end <strong>of</strong> the crop season. Thus, the early stages <strong>of</strong> crop growth <strong>of</strong><br />
the first planting were exposed to higher soil temperatures, while in reproductive growth stages<br />
<strong>of</strong> that planting were exposed to lower temperatures. On the other hand, early and later growth<br />
stages <strong>of</strong> the crop planted on later dates (P3 and P4) were sequentially exposed to lower and<br />
higher soil temperatures.<br />
Ecosystem based approaches for climate change adaptation, ecosystem services, integrated farming system<br />
models, Land degradation neutrality<br />
203 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Under non-mulched treatment, the mean morning soil temperatures varied from 14.3°C (P 4 )<br />
to16.1°C (P1), while the evening soil temperature ranged from 23.3 (P2) to 25.9°C (P1 ) under<br />
different dates <strong>of</strong> planting. Irrespective <strong>of</strong> dates <strong>of</strong> planting the mean weekly temperatures were<br />
the highest under black polythene with mean values <strong>of</strong> 16.3°C and 27.2°Cin morning and<br />
evening, respectively, whereas, the lowest morning temperature was observed under nonmulched<br />
(with a mean value <strong>of</strong> 15.1°C) condition, but the lowest evening temperature was<br />
recorded under straw mulch (22.2°C).<br />
Deviation <strong>of</strong> weekly morning and evening soil temperatures under rice straw mulch and black<br />
polythene from the soil temperatures under non-mulched treatment were calculated and<br />
presented in Fig. 2. The weekly morning soil temperatures under both rice straw (M1) and<br />
black polythene mulch were higher by 0.54 (P3) to 0.63°C (P1) and 1.07 (P2) to 1.63°C (P1),<br />
respectively as compared to the non-mulched treatment. On the other hand, the weekly evening<br />
soil temperature was reduced by 1.02 (P1) to 1.18 °C (P2) under rice straw mulch (M1) but<br />
increased by 1.9 (P2) to 2.47 °C (P1) under black polythene mulch (M2) irrespective <strong>of</strong> planting<br />
dates.<br />
Fruit yield <strong>of</strong> Tomato:<br />
The fruit yield <strong>of</strong> tomato cultivar Arka Rakshak planted under different planting dates and<br />
mulching treatments ranged between 76.6 and 392.6 q ha -1 with an overall mean <strong>of</strong> 234.9 q ha -1 ,<br />
irrespective <strong>of</strong> planting dates and mulching treatments, however, varied significantly under<br />
different dates <strong>of</strong> planting and mulching treatments. The highest and lowest fruit yield was<br />
recorded under the second and last date <strong>of</strong> planting with average yields <strong>of</strong> 137.3 and 99.9 q ha -<br />
1 , respectively. The highest fruit yield was recorded under the second date <strong>of</strong> planting (P2) with<br />
an average yield <strong>of</strong> 337.3 q ha -1 , which reduced gradually by 49.9 and 70.4 percent under the<br />
P3 and P4, respectively. The fruit yield in the case <strong>of</strong> crop planting on 25th October was also<br />
reduced by 3.3 as compared to P2. Among the mulching treatments, the highest fruit yield was<br />
recorded under black polythene (267.9 q ha -1 ), followed by rice straw mulch (234.2 q ha -1 ) and<br />
non-mulched treatment (173.7 q ha -1 ).<br />
The highest fruit yield in P 2 could be attributed to the occurrence <strong>of</strong> a favorable thermal<br />
environment resulting in better crop growth with higher yield attributing characters. In the case<br />
<strong>of</strong> late plantings (beyond 14 November), the period <strong>of</strong> the harvest was reduced considerably<br />
due to exposure <strong>of</strong> the harvesting stage <strong>of</strong> the crop to comparatively higher soil and air<br />
temperature resulting in poor fruit yield on later dates (P3 and P4). Despite experiencing a<br />
longer harvest period, exposure <strong>of</strong> the early growth period to the higher soil and air<br />
temperatures forced the crop to enter into the reproductive stage in advance with lower LAI<br />
and biomass, which caused a reduction <strong>of</strong> fruit yield in the first date <strong>of</strong> planting as compared to<br />
P 2. It is to be mentioned that fruiting and fruit maturity stages <strong>of</strong> the crop planted on the first<br />
204 | Page<br />
Ecosystem based approaches for climate change adaptation, ecosystem services, integrated farming system models, Land<br />
degradation neutrality
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
date <strong>of</strong> planting were exposed to the exceptionally lower minimum temperature (below 10°C)<br />
for about 9 weeks (49 to 5 th SMW). The 54.2 percent increase in fruit yield under black<br />
polythene as compared to the non-mulched condition might be attributed to the fact <strong>of</strong><br />
recording <strong>of</strong> higher soil temperature (weekly mean), particularly during 49thto 5thSMW by up<br />
to 1.84°C under black polythene as compared to non-mulched condition.<br />
Thermal indices:<br />
Irrespective <strong>of</strong> mulching treatments, the GDD accumulation from planting to end <strong>of</strong> the fruit<br />
harvest in tomato variety Arka Rakshak reduced from 2140 to 1463°C Day, when planting the<br />
tomato cultivar was delayed from 25 th October to 3 rd December, but it again increased to<br />
1687°C Day when planting was further delayed to 8th January. Irrespective <strong>of</strong> planting dates,<br />
the highest GDD accumulation to attain the end <strong>of</strong> harvest from planting was observed under<br />
black polythene (1857°C Day), followed by rice straw (1784°C Day) and non-mulched<br />
treatment (1669°C Day), which might be due to increasing in crop duration as a whole under<br />
black polythene.<br />
Day temperature accumulation from planting to the end <strong>of</strong> the harvest was the highest on the<br />
first date <strong>of</strong> planting (3526°C) and lowest on the third date <strong>of</strong> planting (2502°C) without<br />
considering the effect <strong>of</strong> mulching treatment. The marginal increase in accumulated Day<br />
temperature on the last date <strong>of</strong> planting compared to the third date <strong>of</strong> planting was probably<br />
due to exposure <strong>of</strong> both vegetative as well as reproductive stages <strong>of</strong> the last planting to a<br />
continuous rise in both daily maximum and minimum temperatures. Irrespective <strong>of</strong> planting<br />
dates, the highest Day temperature accumulation from planting to physiological maturity was<br />
observed under black polythene (3064°C), followed by rice straw (2955°C) and non-mulched<br />
treatment (2782°C Day). The lower coefficient <strong>of</strong> variation <strong>of</strong> Day temperature accumulation<br />
to attain any maturity as compared with GDD is the indication <strong>of</strong> the efficiency <strong>of</strong> Day<br />
temperature as a better thermal index.<br />
The heat use efficiency (HUE) for fruit yield was influenced by both dates <strong>of</strong> planting and<br />
mulching treatments. Irrespective <strong>of</strong> mulching treatments, HUE for fruit yield ranged from 1.3<br />
to 5.2 kg ha -1 °C -1 , respectively. Relatively higher HUE recorded under the second date <strong>of</strong><br />
planting as compared to later dates <strong>of</strong> plantings was possibly due to higher fruit yield in the<br />
crop planted on 14th November. Perhaps for the same region, HUE for both biomass and fruit<br />
yields was highest under black polythene (5.4 and 3.6 kg ha -1 °C -1 ) mulch as compared to rice<br />
straw (4.9 and 3. kg ha -1 °C -1 ) and non-mulched condition (3.6 and 2.3 kg ha -1 °C -1 ).<br />
Correlation studies between crop growth parameters and fruit yield, and thermal indices<br />
(Thermal time, Day temperature, and Heat use efficiency) confirmed the existence <strong>of</strong> a<br />
significant and positive correlation between fruit yield and thermal indices. Therefore, these<br />
indices can be utilized for developing equations for predicting the fruit yield <strong>of</strong> the tomato.<br />
Ecosystem based approaches for climate change adaptation, ecosystem services, integrated farming system<br />
models, Land degradation neutrality<br />
205 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
References<br />
Anonymous. 2018. FAO Database: February, 2018. FAO, Rome, Italy.<br />
Ham, J.M., Kluitenberg, G.J. and Lamont, W.J. 1993. Optical properties <strong>of</strong> plastic mulches<br />
affect the field temperature regime. J. American Soc. Hort. Sci. 118: 188-193.<br />
Medhi, K., Neog, P., Goswami, B., Deka, R.L. and Hussain, R. (2019). Agrometeorological<br />
Indices in Relation to Phenology and Yield <strong>of</strong> Rice genotype (Oryza sativa L.) under<br />
Upper Brahmaputra Valley Zone <strong>of</strong> Assam. Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. App. Sci. 8(06): xxxx.<br />
doi: https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2019.806.xx<br />
Naika, S., Jeude, J., G<strong>of</strong>fau, M., Hilmi, M. and Dam, B. 2019. Cultivation <strong>of</strong> tomato<br />
production, processing and marketing. ISBN Agromisa: 90-8573-039-2 ISBN CTA: 92-<br />
9081-299-0.<br />
Teasdale, J.R. and Mohler, C.L. 1993. Light transmittance, soil temperature, and soil moisture<br />
under residue <strong>of</strong> hairy vetch and rye. Agron. J. 85: 673-680.<br />
Venkatraman, S. 1968. Climatic consideration in cropping pattern Proc. symposium on New<br />
cropping pattern in India. ICAR, New Delhi, pp. 251-260.<br />
T2-24P-1472<br />
Natural Resource Management in Rapeseed, Field pea and Lentil under<br />
Senapati District<br />
Dipin Wangkheimayum, N. Jyotsna and R.S. Telem<br />
Krishi Vigyan Kendra-Senapati, Manipur, India<br />
This survey was conducted during the year 2011-19 on NHM <strong>of</strong> three selected crops at<br />
different villages <strong>of</strong> Senapati. In this paper, we studied the natural resource management <strong>of</strong><br />
some selected agronomical crops viz., Rapeseed var. TS-36, Pea var. Aman and Lentil var.<br />
HUL57 to demonstrate their economics. We found that, yield <strong>of</strong> rapeseed, pea and lentil were<br />
7.12 q ha -1 ; 13.62 q ha -1 and 6.96 q ha -1 respectively. The gross cost <strong>of</strong> rapeseed, pea and lentil<br />
were reported as Rs.16900; 46000 and 32446 respectively. Highest net income was found in<br />
Pea var. Aman which was Rs 22100 and lowest was 11580 in rapeseed var. TS-36. The BCR<br />
for the crops rapeseed var-36, field Pea var. Aman and lentil var. HUL57 were found to be<br />
1:68:1; 1.48:1 and 1.5:1 respectively. During the year 2011-2018, we conducted the various<br />
intervention programmes viz., mulching with crop residue and sawdust <strong>of</strong> rabi crops; farm<br />
ponds construction and renovation; stone lining wall; and vermiculture and composting unit,<br />
mulching with paddy straw and crop residues; azolla cultivation; jalkund ro<strong>of</strong> rain water<br />
206 | Page<br />
Ecosystem based approaches for climate change adaptation, ecosystem services, integrated farming system models, Land<br />
degradation neutrality
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
harvesting structure; zero tillage <strong>of</strong> rapeseed; check dam construction; open well development;<br />
minimum tillage <strong>of</strong> rapeseed var. TS-36; field pea var. Aman; and lentil var. HUL-57. In these<br />
intervention programmes; number <strong>of</strong> beneficiaries ranges from 2-14 were benefited by<br />
adopting the various programme mentioned above which were provided by the KVK Senapati<br />
for the socioeconomic sustainability.<br />
T2-25P-1482<br />
Assessment <strong>of</strong> Pr<strong>of</strong>itable Intercropping System for Alfisols Under Dryland<br />
Condition in Eastern Dry Zone <strong>of</strong> Karnataka<br />
Mudalagiriyappa., B.G. Vasanthi, K. M. Puneetha, M. Madan Kumar, H.S. Latha, and<br />
K. Devaraja<br />
All India Co-ordinated Research Project for Dryland Agriculture, UAS, GKVK, Bengaluru<br />
Intercropping in the dryland areas ensures better utilization <strong>of</strong> all growth resources. The soils <strong>of</strong><br />
the drylands are not only thirsty but also hungry. So, to replenish nutrient pool, conservation <strong>of</strong><br />
soil and water and stability in yield, intercropping systems are necessary for the dryland<br />
conditions/areas. The experiment consists <strong>of</strong> assessing the finger millet, pigeonpea and<br />
groundnut along with suitable intercrops. The different intercropping yields were converted<br />
into the finger millet equivalent yield.<br />
Methodology<br />
The experimental field study was conducted at the AICRP for dryland agriculture, Bengaluru<br />
for three consecutive kharif seasons (2017-2019) to determine the pr<strong>of</strong>itable intercropping<br />
system for the red soils in the Eastern Dry Zone <strong>of</strong> the Karnataka under the dryland condition.<br />
In the Eastern Dry Zone <strong>of</strong> Karnataka, the most predominant intercropping systems are viz.,<br />
Ragi, Pigeon pea, Groundnut, Maize and Castor based intercropping systems for Alfisols under<br />
dryland situations. The cereal- legume interaction helps both the crops in their growth behavior<br />
and inputs requirements leading to improvement and efficient utilization <strong>of</strong> resources like<br />
nutrient, moisture, light and thereby increases productivity with enhancement <strong>of</strong> soil health by<br />
taking advantages <strong>of</strong> biological nitrogen fixation by the legumes. The experiment comprised <strong>of</strong><br />
10treatments. viz, T 1: sole Finger millet, T 2: sole Pigeon pea, T 3: sole Groundnut, T 4: Finger<br />
millet + pigeonpea (DS with BRG-5 variety), T5: Finger millet + pigeonpea (TP with BRG-5<br />
variety), T6: Finger millet + akkadi, T7:Pigeonpea (BRG-1) + soybean (1:1), T8: Pigeonpea<br />
(BRG -2) + cowpea (1:1), T 9: Pigeonpea (BRG-2) + field bean (1:1) and T 10: Groundnut<br />
(ICGV-91114) + pigeonpea (BRG-5) (8:2). The crops were sown during kharif, finger millet<br />
sown during month <strong>of</strong> July, pigeonpea in the month <strong>of</strong> May, cowpea, soyabean and fieldbean<br />
in the month <strong>of</strong> May, groundnut in the month <strong>of</strong> June. The plot size <strong>of</strong> 3 m × 5m was adopted.<br />
The varieties used were; finger millet (MR-6), pigeonpea (BRG-2 and BRG-5), groundnut<br />
(variety ICGV 91114), Soyabean (Hardy), cowpea(IT 38956-1), fieldbean (HA-4).Akkadi crops<br />
Ecosystem based approaches for climate change adaptation, ecosystem services, integrated farming system<br />
models, Land degradation neutrality<br />
207 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
comprised <strong>of</strong> mixture <strong>of</strong> fieldbean, cowpea, pigeonpea and mustard, and the recommended<br />
dose <strong>of</strong> fertilizer for finger millet was 50:40:37.5 kgha -1 ;pigeonpea, 25:50:25; groundnut,<br />
25:50:25; both for sole and intercropping system. For pigeonpea transplanted seedlings were<br />
raised in polythene cover during (May) and transplanted during July (45 days old seedling).<br />
Evaluation <strong>of</strong> the cropping system was carried out by using the following indices,<br />
Production efficiency: Production effieciency (PE) (kg/day) =<br />
System pr<strong>of</strong>itability: System pr<strong>of</strong>itability =<br />
<br />
<br />
Relative economic efficiency (REE):REE (%) = <br />
<br />
improved/diversified system; ENR- net returns in the existing system<br />
Finger millet equivalent yield (FMEY):<br />
Results<br />
()<br />
()<br />
× 100 where, DNR- net returns obtained under<br />
Yield <strong>of</strong> intercrop × price <strong>of</strong> inter crop<br />
FMEY = yield <strong>of</strong> main crop +<br />
price <strong>of</strong> main crop<br />
The different intercropping yields were converted into the finger millet equivalent yield.<br />
Among the different intercropping systems, comparing with finger millet based intercropping<br />
systems transplanted finger millet intercropped with pigeonpea(T5) recorded higher finger<br />
millet equivalent yield <strong>of</strong> 3946 kg ha -1 followed by finger millet + pigeonpea (Direct sown)<br />
(T 4) with FMEY (3284 kg ha -1 ). There was nearly 20.80 % and 4.84 % increase in yield over<br />
sole finger millet (T1)(3125 kg ha -1 ) . The higher yield attributes in finger millet might be due<br />
to the intercropping with pigeonpea, which could be ascribed to the ability <strong>of</strong> pigeonpea to fix<br />
atmospheric nitrogen, slow growth <strong>of</strong> pigeon pea in the initial period, better moisture<br />
conservation and also transplanting finger millet, resulted in good crop growth and<br />
establishment. These results were in conformity with findings <strong>of</strong> Anchal das and Sudhishri<br />
(2010). The better result was also due to the drought tolerance mechanisms <strong>of</strong> finger millet<br />
which showed noble yield under inconsistent rains during the cropping period. Among<br />
pigeonpea based intercropping system, higher finger millet equivalent yield <strong>of</strong> 1805 kg ha -1<br />
was recorded in T9 than sole pigeonpea T2(1163 kg ha -1 ). There was 35 % increase in yield in<br />
T 9. The increase in yield advantage was noticed when the component crops in an intercropping<br />
system do not compete for the same ecological riches and the interspecific competition for a<br />
given resources is weaker than the intraspecific competition. The bigger complementary effects<br />
and yield advantages occur when the component crops have different growing periods so as<br />
their major demands on resources varies with time (Ofori and Steen 1981) which was clearly<br />
seen under pigeonpea based intercropping system. Similarly, with respect to groundnut based<br />
intercropping system higher yield advantage was noticed in T 10 compared to growing sole<br />
ground nut (T3) (995 kg ha -1 ). The increase in yield <strong>of</strong> groundnut with pigeonpea as intercrop<br />
208 | Page<br />
Ecosystem based approaches for climate change adaptation, ecosystem services, integrated farming system models, Land<br />
degradation neutrality
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
was due to better use <strong>of</strong> environmental resources showing that crops with different maturity<br />
express the maximum demand for nutrients and moisture, aerial space and light and could be<br />
suitably intercropped (Enyi, 1977). With respect to the system pr<strong>of</strong>itability <strong>of</strong> the different<br />
intercropping system grown under the dryland conditions, T 5recorded higher system<br />
pr<strong>of</strong>itability 214 Rs. /ha/day followed by direct sown Finger millet + pigeonpea (170<br />
Rs/ha/day) and sole finger millet (165 Rs./ha/day). With respect to relative economic efficiency<br />
(%) higher relative economic efficiency 34.43 %, 461.69 % and 582.08 % was observed in<br />
T5[Finger millet+ Pigeonpea (TP)], T9 [Pigeonpea+field bean (1:1)] and T10[Groundnut+<br />
Pigeonpea(8:2)] over their sole crops. Intercropping assures more efficient utilization <strong>of</strong> the<br />
resources and higher productivity compared with each sole crop <strong>of</strong> the mixture (Mucheru-muna<br />
et al. 2010). Increase in system pr<strong>of</strong>itability and relative efficiency % increase was due to<br />
better utilization <strong>of</strong> growth resources such as light, water and nutrients which was absorbed and<br />
converted into biomass by the intercrop over time and space.<br />
References<br />
Anchal das and Sudhishri, S., 2010, Intercropping in finger millet (Eleusinecoracana) with pulses for<br />
enhanced productivity, resource conservation and soil fertility in uplands <strong>of</strong> Southern Orissa.<br />
Indian J. Agon., 55(2): 89-94.<br />
Andrews, D.J. and Kassam, A.H. 1976. The importance <strong>of</strong> multiple cropping in increasing world food<br />
supplies. In: Papendick RI, Sanchez PA, Triplett GB (eds) Multiple Cropping. ASA Special<br />
Publication 27, American Science <strong>of</strong> Agronomy, Madison, WI, USA.<br />
Enyi, V.A.C. 1977. Grain yield in groundnut, Exp. Agric., 13: 101-110.<br />
Ofori, F. and Stern, W.R. 1987. Cereal-legume intercropping system, Adv in Agronomy, 41: 41-90.<br />
Yield, economics, RWUE, Production efficiency as influenced by the different<br />
intercropping system (pooled data <strong>of</strong> 3 years)<br />
Treatments<br />
Main<br />
crop<br />
(kg/ha)<br />
Inter<br />
crop<br />
(kg/ha)<br />
FMEY<br />
(kg/ha)<br />
Rain water use<br />
efficiency<br />
(kg ha-mm -1 )<br />
Production<br />
efficiency<br />
(kg day -1 )<br />
Net<br />
returns<br />
(Rs. ha -1 )<br />
T1 3125 - 3125 6.39 28.41 60095<br />
T2 593 - 1163 1.63 10.57 4749<br />
T3 798 - 995 2.01 9.05 -7280<br />
T4 2829 243 3284 6.82 29.85 62077<br />
T5 3379 300 3946 8.15 35.88 78266<br />
T6 2640 127 2828 5.71 25.71 46643<br />
T7 698 100 1391 1.84 12.65 10322<br />
T8 684 151 1457 1.93 13.25 11589<br />
T9 650 362 1805 2.42 16.41 21045<br />
T10 1310 143 1872 3.10 17.02 13820<br />
Ecosystem based approaches for climate change adaptation, ecosystem services, integrated farming system<br />
models, Land degradation neutrality<br />
209 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
S.Em± 153.31 0.40 1.39<br />
CD (0.05) 455.50 1.19 4.14<br />
* FMEY: finger millet equivalent yield<br />
T2-26P-1497<br />
Impact <strong>of</strong> Improved Practices in Rainfed Integrated Farming System on<br />
System Productivity and Employment Generation <strong>of</strong> Rainfed Farmers in<br />
Tumkuru District <strong>of</strong> Karnataka<br />
H. S. Latha, Mudalagiriyappa., K. Devaraja, M. Madan Kumar, B. G. Vasanthi, and K.<br />
M. Puneetha<br />
All India Co-ordinated research Project for Dryland Agriculture, UAS, GKVK,<br />
Bengaluru-560 065, Karnataka<br />
In Karnataka, the majority <strong>of</strong> farmers are small land holders having less than two hectares.<br />
These farmers generally practice subsistence farming, where they need to produce a<br />
continuous, reliable and balanced supply <strong>of</strong> food, as well as cash for basic needs and recurrent<br />
farm expenditure. Several methods <strong>of</strong> integrated farming system for bringing sustainability <strong>of</strong><br />
irrigated ecosystem with ample data were developed. However, the research data base on IFS<br />
for rainfed ecosystem is meagre. Further, changing climate is devastating the sustainability <strong>of</strong><br />
the fragile ecosystem. Also, the future food security in the country largely depends on the<br />
vertical expansion <strong>of</strong> allied activities in the rainfed ecosystem. Hence, the research for<br />
developing appropriate proportion <strong>of</strong> different components <strong>of</strong> IFS to rainfed ecosystem gains<br />
momentum. The research is implemented with the objectives<br />
1. To develop efficient, economically viable and environmentally sustainable IFS modules<br />
2. On-farm assessment/refinement/ strengthening <strong>of</strong> traditional rainfed farming systems with<br />
improved rainfed technologies<br />
3. To optimize on-farm integration <strong>of</strong> farm enterprises for enhanced farm incomes, resource/<br />
input use efficiencies and employment opportunities<br />
Methodology<br />
The IFS villages have been selected in two blocks <strong>of</strong> Tumkur district viz.,Koratagare block:<br />
Elerampura, Vagginakurike and Pataganahalli<strong>of</strong> Koratagare taluk, Tumakuru district as block-<br />
I villages; and Tumakuru block: Seethakallu, Kalenahalli and Gidaganahalli <strong>of</strong> Tumkur taluk,<br />
Tumkur district as block-II villages.Among the six villages Kalenahallivillage <strong>of</strong> Tumkur<br />
taluk, Tumkur district was selected as study area under Eastern Dry Zone (Zone-5) <strong>of</strong><br />
Karnataka. The study area is located at 13 º 18̍̍ 38"N Latitude, 77 º 16̍̍ 30"E Longitude and at a<br />
distance <strong>of</strong> about 80 km from GKVK campus. The selection <strong>of</strong> farmers based on the farming<br />
situation, farming system and farmer’scategory .<br />
210 | Page<br />
Ecosystem based approaches for climate change adaptation, ecosystem services, integrated farming system models, Land<br />
degradation neutrality
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Based on the survey, technical interventions have been taken up under different themes as<br />
follows: NRM module: In-situ moisture conservation between paired rows <strong>of</strong> pigeon pea,<br />
Contour cultivation, Mechanization: Sowing through Bullock drawn seed drill and weeding by<br />
cycle weeder; Improved varieties: Finger millet (MR-1, GPU-28, ML-365), Groundnut (ICGV-<br />
91114, KCG-6, K-6, K-1812) and Pigeonpea (BRG-5, BRG-2); Intercropping system: Finger<br />
millet + Pigeonpea (8:2), Groundnut + Pigeonpea (8:2), Pigeonpea + Field bean (1:1) and<br />
Cowpea + Field bean (1:1); Fodder module: Fodder maize (SA-tall), Fodder sorghum, Napier<br />
multi-cut (CO-5); Perennial module: Melia dubia and tamarind has been introduced; Animal<br />
module: Deworming 5-10 mg/kg <strong>of</strong> body weight (40ml /cow), Dry fodder: 5-7 kg/day/animal,<br />
Green fodder: 25-30 kg/day/animal, Concentrates (Energy source: protein source: bran in<br />
50:25:25 ratio): 4 kg/day/animal, Perethrin soap, Hi-min- Multi mineral nutrient mixture<br />
(40g/animal/day)<br />
Results<br />
Among the different farmers category irrespective <strong>of</strong> different modules and farming situation<br />
there is considerable improvement in system productivity (6567 kg/farming system) and<br />
employment generation (343) in improved practices than the traditional farmers practice (4367<br />
kg/farming system and 309, respectively) in marginal farmers category. Similarly, in small<br />
farmer’s category higher system productivity (9321 kg/farming system) and employment<br />
generation (351) was recorded in improved technological interventions than existing farmers<br />
practices under rainfed farming situation. Further, under partially irrigated situation higher<br />
system productivity (11909 kg/farming system and 14397 kg/farming system) and employment<br />
generation (366- and 411-man days) was registered in improved practices both in marginal and<br />
small farmer’s category, respectively (Mudalagiriyappa et al., 2017 and Ramachandrappa et<br />
al., 2017). Further there was an increase in yield was noticed from 30 - 40 % and increase in<br />
net return from 33 - 45 % both in rainfed and partially irrigated farming situation.<br />
Conclusion<br />
Integrated farming practices viz., in-situ moisture conservation between paired rows <strong>of</strong> pigeon<br />
pea, sowing through bullock drawn seed drill and weeding by cycle weeder, using <strong>of</strong> improved<br />
finger millet, groundnut and pigeonpea varieties and implementation <strong>of</strong> mineral mixture for<br />
animals has enhanced the system productivity (kg/farming system) employment generation<br />
(man days) and in improved practices than traditional practices followed by farmers. The<br />
demonstrations also served as tools for up scaling the technologies to the surrounding farmers,<br />
extension functionaries and policy makers<br />
References<br />
Mudalagiriyappa., Ramachandrappa, B.K., Thimmegowda, M.N., Devraja, K., Krishnamurthy,<br />
R., Ravindra Chary, G., Puneetha, K.M., Savitha, M. S., Narayan Hebbal and Shree<br />
Ecosystem based approaches for climate change adaptation, ecosystem services, integrated farming system<br />
models, Land degradation neutrality<br />
211 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Harsha Kumar, S. S., 2017, Dryland technologies at farmer doorstep- A Real line at<br />
Baichenahalli, Tumakuru District. All India Co-ordinated Research Project for Dryland<br />
Agriculture, Directorate <strong>of</strong> Research, University <strong>of</strong> Agricultural Sciences, Bangalore,<br />
Karnataka, p.84.<br />
Ramachandrappa, B. K., Dhanapal, G. N., Mariraju, H., Indrakumar, N., Jagadeesh B. N.and<br />
Balakrishna Reddy, P. C., 2011, Dryland technologies for alfisols <strong>of</strong> Southern dry<br />
region <strong>of</strong> Karnataka and success stories. All India Co-ordinated Research Project for<br />
Dryland Agriculture, University <strong>of</strong> Agricultural Sciences, Bangalore 58 p.<br />
System productivity, employment generation and increase in yield (%) as influenced by<br />
improved technological interventions during 2020-21<br />
Farmer’s<br />
category<br />
Existing<br />
farmers<br />
practice<br />
Improved<br />
practice<br />
System productivity<br />
(kg/farming system)<br />
(FMEY)*<br />
Increase<br />
in yield<br />
(%)<br />
Rainfed<br />
Increase<br />
in<br />
Net<br />
returns<br />
(%)<br />
Existing<br />
farmers<br />
practice<br />
Improved<br />
practice<br />
Employment generation<br />
(man-days)<br />
Marginal 4367 6567 31.42 41.31 309 343<br />
Small 5737 9321 38.29 44.66 316 351<br />
Partially Irrigated<br />
Marginal 7837 11909 34.36 42.64 319 366<br />
Small 10146 14397 30.62 33.41 358 411<br />
T2-27P-1511<br />
Livestock Interventions as an Additional Source <strong>of</strong> Income to Rainfed<br />
Farmers <strong>of</strong> Ananthapuramu District, Andhra Pradesh<br />
K. Madhavi 1 , K. Sudha Rani 1 , B. Chandana 1 , V. Sivajyothi 1 , M. Ravi Kishore 1 , K. Naveen<br />
Kumar 1 , Malleswari Sadhineni 1 , J.V. Prasad 2 and J.V.N.S. Prasad 3<br />
1 Acharya NG Ranga Agricultural University, Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Reddipalli, AP – 515 701<br />
2 ICAR-ATARI, CRIDA campus, Hyderabad – 500 059<br />
3<br />
ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad – 500 059<br />
Ananthapuramu is one <strong>of</strong> the drought prone districts <strong>of</strong> Andhra Pradesh particularly in southern<br />
India. The district secures least rainfall when compared to other districts <strong>of</strong> Rayalaseema<br />
region and other parts <strong>of</strong> Andhra Pradesh too. As the water is a scarce commodity, livestock<br />
suffered from lack <strong>of</strong> green grass and fodder.<br />
212 | Page<br />
Ecosystem based approaches for climate change adaptation, ecosystem services, integrated farming system models, Land<br />
degradation neutrality
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Methodology<br />
Demonstration <strong>of</strong> establishment <strong>of</strong> improved fodder varieties, area specific mineral mixture,<br />
urea molasses blocks and backyard poultry rearing as an additional source <strong>of</strong> income<br />
generation were demonstrated to the farmers <strong>of</strong> NICRA adopted villages.<br />
Results<br />
Improved Fodder Varieties<br />
The correct amount and proportion <strong>of</strong> dry fodder, green fodder, and nutrients should be<br />
included in the animals’ balanced diet. Animals get the nutritional components they need for<br />
physical growth and milk production from green grass in general. As rainfall is chief constraint<br />
in Ananthapuramu district, even the dry fodder availability from crop residues is less due to<br />
less yield <strong>of</strong> majority <strong>of</strong> rainfed agriculture crops in this area. Hence, farmers are made aware<br />
<strong>of</strong> the perennial multicut fodder varieties (Super Napier &fodder sorghum) with high protein<br />
and crude fibre availability in the improved fodder varieties (Kabirizi et al., 2003). Farmers<br />
were distributed with Super Napier fodder slips &fodder sorghum seed from 2018 to 2021,<br />
green fodder was made available to animals through-out the year with an average yield <strong>of</strong> 167<br />
t/ha <strong>of</strong> fodder and thereby increasing the productive performance over that <strong>of</strong> locally available<br />
fodder with an average yield <strong>of</strong> 118 t/ha.<br />
Regional Specific Mineral Mixture<br />
Minerals are required by dairy animals for their metabolic functions, growth, milk production,<br />
reproduction and health. Animal cannot synthesize minerals inside its body and usually feeds<br />
and fodders fed to the dairy animals do not provide all the minerals in the required quantity<br />
(Sahoo et al., 2017). Therefore, animal should be supplemented with adequate amount <strong>of</strong> good<br />
quality mineral mixture in their ration. Level <strong>of</strong> minerals in feeds and fodder varies from region<br />
to region, thus mineral availability to the animal also varies. So, it is necessary to produce<br />
region specific mineral mixture accordingly. Area specific mineral mixture <strong>of</strong> 2kg each was<br />
supplied to 30 farmers every year from 2018-2021 in NICRA adopted villages, monitored the<br />
% increase in milk yield, fat and SNF% for a period <strong>of</strong> 60 days interval. The mean average<br />
milk yield, SNF% & Fat% recorded in the treatment group supplied with RSMM was 3.57<br />
l/day, 8.35% & 3.5% over the control group fed without supplementation <strong>of</strong> RSMM with<br />
recorded parameters <strong>of</strong> 2.90 l/day, 7.8% & 2.9%, respectively.<br />
Urea Molasses Mineral Blocks<br />
The principal forages used in India for livestock feeding are low in nitrogen, minerals and<br />
vitamins resulting in low productivity. To overcome this strategic nutrient supplementation is<br />
essential in this scenario to improve the use <strong>of</strong> poor-quality roughage. The Urea Molasses<br />
Mineral Block (UMMB) was developed at NDDB and supplementation <strong>of</strong> UMMB can show<br />
Ecosystem based approaches for climate change adaptation, ecosystem services, integrated farming system<br />
models, Land degradation neutrality<br />
213 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
promising effects on productivity <strong>of</strong> animals. UMMB supplementation significantly increases<br />
feed intake, milk yield and growth rate and is therefore a cost-effective. UMMB provides<br />
fermentable nitrogen, energy and minerals necessary for optimum microbial growth. Molasses<br />
is noted for its sugar content and urea is a non-protein nitrogen compound (Rajesh Singh,<br />
2021). The UMMB supplementation in feed <strong>of</strong> Ruminants was carried out in NICRA adopted<br />
villages from 2018 to 2021. Feeding <strong>of</strong> UMMB to animals led in the marked increase in mean<br />
% <strong>of</strong> SNF (8.35%), milk yield (3.6 l/day) over that <strong>of</strong> the control group fed without<br />
supplementation <strong>of</strong> mineral blocks with mean % <strong>of</strong> SNF (7.93%), milk yield (2.95 l/day).<br />
Backyard Poultry Rearing<br />
Livestock and poultry provide a major contribution to India’s economy. In rural economy<br />
poultry farming contributes an important role especially for the socio-economic development<br />
<strong>of</strong> the weaker section <strong>of</strong> the society in India (Vermaet al., 2020). It generates self-employment,<br />
provides supplementary income and supplements protein rich diet at relatively low cost. In the<br />
state, the source <strong>of</strong> egg and meat production is mostly from exotic layers and broilers as well as<br />
the traditional local breeds. The high yielding layers and broilers cannot survive under suboptimal<br />
nutritional and managerial condition within stressful environment. The local breeds are<br />
very low productive with laying capacity <strong>of</strong> 20-30 eggs per year and very slower growth. These<br />
breeds are replaced with superior breeds phenotypically similar to existing poultry population<br />
& can acclimatize local climatic conditions. Under the NICRA project 60 rural women from<br />
NICRA adopted villages every year are supplied with kadaknath breed <strong>of</strong> poultry birds (10<br />
each) with good egg & meat production from which self-employment has been created by<br />
generation <strong>of</strong> additional income to women through sale <strong>of</strong> eggs & meat.<br />
References<br />
Sahoo, B., Kumar, R., Garg, A. K., Mohanta, R. K., Agarwal, A & Sharma, A. K. 2017. Effect<br />
<strong>of</strong> supplementing area specific mineral mixture on productive performance <strong>of</strong> crossbred<br />
cows. Ind. J. Ani. Nut., 34(4): 414-419.<br />
Rajesh Singh. 2021. Urea molasses mineral blocks as a feed supplement.<br />
Pashudhan Praharee Kabirizi, J., Muyekho, F., Mulaa, M., Nampijja, Z., Kawube, G., Namazzi,<br />
C and Alicai, T. 2017. Napier grass feed resource: production, constraints and<br />
implications for smallholder farmers in east and Central Africa. Environ Res.<br />
Verma, L. P., Sonkar, N., and Verma, C. 2020. Kadaknath chicken farming: Empowering<br />
Indian rural economy: A review. Breast, 16: 0-61.<br />
214 | Page<br />
Ecosystem based approaches for climate change adaptation, ecosystem services, integrated farming system models, Land<br />
degradation neutrality
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Impact <strong>of</strong> supplementation <strong>of</strong> RSMM on productive performance <strong>of</strong> animals<br />
Year Benefited Avg. milk<br />
yield l/day<br />
Avg.<br />
SNF%/day<br />
Avg.<br />
Fat%/day<br />
Income Generated/<br />
month<br />
No.<strong>of</strong><br />
Farmers<br />
No.<strong>of</strong><br />
Animals<br />
FP+<br />
RSMM<br />
FP<br />
FP+<br />
RSMM<br />
FP<br />
FP+<br />
RSMM<br />
FP<br />
FP+<br />
RSMM<br />
2018-19 30 30 3.5 2.9 8.4 8.0 3.8 3.0 4200/- 2610/-<br />
2019-20 10 30 3.6 3.0 8.4 7.6 3.5 2.8 4320/- 2700/-<br />
202--21 15 45 3.5 2.9 8.2 7.9 3.2 2.8 3885/- 3150/-<br />
2021-22 30 30 3.7 2.8 8.4 8.0 3.5 3.0 4440/- 3108/-<br />
Total/Mean 85 135 3.57 2.9 8.35 7.8 3.5 2.9 4212/- 2892/-<br />
FP<br />
-28P-1545<br />
Kadaknath Poultry Farming as an Emerging Way to Increase Farmer’s<br />
Income in Rainfed Farming Systems in Jhabua<br />
Chandan Kumar, I.S. Tomar and Anil Kumar Sharma<br />
Krishi Vigyan Kendra Jhabua, RVSKVV Gwalior (M.P)<br />
Animal husbandry is an integral component <strong>of</strong> rainfed farming systems and, is a significant<br />
revenue stream for farmers. The livestock including sheep, goat and poultry which are integral<br />
to many rainfed areas go unnoticed, or get lesser than deserving attention. To conserve the<br />
native breed which is adaptive to local environment and having good potential <strong>of</strong> income<br />
generation known for its black colour which is very rare and precious known as Kadaknath in<br />
India found in Jhabua district <strong>of</strong> M.P. The Kadaknath chicken meat from Jhabua district <strong>of</strong> M.P<br />
received GI Tag in ‘Meat products, poultry & poultry meat’ category. The meat & egg <strong>of</strong><br />
Kadaknath are rich source <strong>of</strong> Protein (21-24%) and lower source <strong>of</strong> Fat (1.96-2.6 %). Black<br />
meat <strong>of</strong> Kadaknath is very popular and delicious; its flesh is <strong>of</strong> higher value and is being used<br />
for the treatment <strong>of</strong> many human diseases by tribal living in Jhabua district. To maintain the<br />
purity <strong>of</strong> the birds and to increase their productive and reproductive efficiency, the scientific<br />
kadaknath production technology which includes balance diet, scheduled vaccination & proper<br />
medication as suggested by KVK Jhabuain NICRA adopted villageshas reduced the mortality<br />
rate from 50% to 10-12% and thus increases the survival percentage. The intervention <strong>of</strong><br />
feeding Azolla Microphylla to kadaknath birds in the adopted village <strong>of</strong> NICRA shows<br />
significant effect and performs much better than traditional rearing system in Jhabua. This<br />
intervention not only checks mortality but also increase their body weight when fed 5% extra<br />
from recommended dose <strong>of</strong> grower feeds to 1 month old kadaknath grower birds. The bird is<br />
gaining the body weight in faster way and attaining saleable body weight <strong>of</strong> 1.10 kg in 105-120<br />
days. This technology gave higher monetary return to farmers due to huge demand for<br />
Ecosystem based approaches for climate change adaptation, ecosystem services, integrated farming system<br />
models, Land degradation neutrality<br />
215 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Kadaknath in the Maharashtra, Gujrat, Rajasthan which encourages Kadaknath production in<br />
the district. The scientific Kadaknath production technology has potential to sustain among<br />
small or sub-marginal farmers.<br />
Methodology<br />
The experiment was done at farmer’s field <strong>of</strong> adopted village <strong>of</strong> KVK Jhabua at Chapri (Rama)<br />
as control, Hatyadeli (Meghnagar) as T 1 and Parwaliya (Thandla) as T 2 <strong>of</strong> KVK Jhabua. For<br />
production <strong>of</strong> Azolla plastic azolla kit was given to them were used <strong>of</strong> size (6 x 3) feet. In each<br />
pit 20 kg <strong>of</strong> soil poured and make a soil bed 1 -2 cm. thick evenly. Each pit filled with water up<br />
to the height <strong>of</strong> 15-20 cm. Around 2.5 kg. Old cow dung/vermin compost and 15 -20 gm. <strong>of</strong><br />
SSP mixed in 10 litre <strong>of</strong> water to make slurry and poured into water bed. Then added about<br />
100-150 g fresh A. Microphylla culture. Harvesting was done after 5 to 7 days and <strong>of</strong>fered to<br />
Kadaknath birds after harvesting washing was done with clean water.<br />
For experimental purpose kadaknath chicks were selected and reared under same diet and same<br />
condition and from same lot <strong>of</strong> parent birds after attaining their age <strong>of</strong> 1 month 600 grower<br />
kadaknath birds were selected which have equal shape and size and weight randomly and<br />
grouped into 3 groups using Randomized Block Design which is further divided in 2 sub<br />
groups or replicates with 200 chicks in each. Fresh Azolla culture were used (3’x6’ size) for<br />
experiments. In T 1 (control)Group (200) two hundred kadaknath birds were fed normal diet<br />
only which contains nutrients,T2 group were fed basal commercial diets along with @ 5% extra<br />
supplementary feed (fresh azolla on DM basis),and in T 3 group 5 % replacement <strong>of</strong> basal diets<br />
with fresh azolla (DM basis) were fed. All the diets (starter and finisher) were prepared as per<br />
BIS (1992). The growth rate, mortality rate was recorded periodically for all the three groups<br />
<strong>of</strong> the experiments and data recorded. Sufficient management conditions like floor space, light,<br />
temperature, ventilation and relative humidity were provided to each <strong>of</strong> the groups. During the<br />
experimental period, they were fed ad libitum on replicate basis and provided with clean and<br />
wholesome water. Data on Initial and final body weight gain was recorded. The data obtained<br />
were statistically assessed by the Analysis <strong>of</strong> Variance through SPSS (17.0) S<strong>of</strong>tware<br />
considering replicates as experimental units. Duncan’s multiple range test was used to test the<br />
significance `f difference between the differences <strong>of</strong> significant at 0.01 and 0.05 %.<br />
Results<br />
The growth performance <strong>of</strong> the grower kadaknath birds fed different levels <strong>of</strong> azolla meals is<br />
presented in the Table. Average final weight <strong>of</strong> the birds at 140 days show were significantly<br />
different in T2 group (p
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
for this decreased gain. Highest value for gain in live weight was exhibited in T 2 group whereas<br />
lowest value was recorded in the T1 group.<br />
Overall growth performance (gm/birds <strong>of</strong> Kadaknath birds (4 th to 42 nd week <strong>of</strong> age)<br />
Age <strong>of</strong> the Birds<br />
T 1 weight<br />
in(gm)Chapri<br />
T 2 weight in(gm)<br />
Hatyadeli<br />
T 3 weight in(gm)<br />
Parwaliya<br />
Initial body weight 169.0±0.5 183.0 ±0.5 180.0±1.5<br />
1 -2 Month 501.0 ± 3.6 512.0±1.4 507.0±3.4<br />
2 - 3 Month 1081.0±2.4 1201±3.8 1107.0±0.71<br />
3 - 4 Month 1102.0±3.4 1311.0±4.4 1205.0±2.6<br />
4 – 5 Month 1508.0±3.1 1618±4.7 1403.0±4.2<br />
Final body weight 1423.0±3.5 1680±3.9* 1583.0±4.5<br />
The mortality rate <strong>of</strong> kadaknath birds in T1, T2, and T3groups were 6 %, 2%, and 3%<br />
respectively which is reflects the promising effect <strong>of</strong> feeding <strong>of</strong> A Micropylla in Kadaknath<br />
birds as in these birds 10 % mortality in the intensive condition is considered normal. The table<br />
below shows the cost <strong>of</strong> rearing <strong>of</strong> the T1 group was found to be Rs-37600 because only 188<br />
birds survived whereas in the T 2 group despite feeding Azolla (Rs-5/birds) the cost comes to<br />
around Rs-38220 as only 4 birds died so input cost increased, and in T3 due to replacement <strong>of</strong><br />
feed cost comes around Rs-37830 only. The pr<strong>of</strong>it in the T 2 group <strong>of</strong> birds was found to be Rs-<br />
31200 more than the T 1 group which is quite impressive and justifies the rearing <strong>of</strong> kadaknath<br />
birds with Azolla.<br />
Groups<br />
No. <strong>of</strong> birds<br />
started with<br />
Economics <strong>of</strong> rearing <strong>of</strong> kadaknath birds (200)<br />
Mortality<br />
(No.)<br />
Input Cost<br />
(INR)<br />
Gross<br />
Return<br />
Net Return<br />
B:C<br />
Ratio<br />
T1 200 12 37600.00 131600.00 94000.00 3.5<br />
T2 200 04 38220.00 156800.00 118580.00 4.1<br />
T3 200 06 37830.00 145500.00 107670.00 3.8<br />
Conclusion<br />
The unorganized poultry sector which contributes around 20% <strong>of</strong> the total poultry population,<br />
Kadaknath is one <strong>of</strong> them reared by tribal as well as selected poultry growers. The palatability,<br />
digestibility, and potential to prevent birds from the disease are the main issues that need to be<br />
addressed in the changing climatic scenario which needs to be addressed. The rearing <strong>of</strong><br />
locally adopted birds like kadaknath and rearing with Azolla show synergistic effects on the<br />
bird’s performance and also increases the income <strong>of</strong> the farmers in all typologies.<br />
Ecosystem based approaches for climate change adaptation, ecosystem services, integrated farming system<br />
models, Land degradation neutrality<br />
217 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
T2-29P-1550<br />
Productivity and Pr<strong>of</strong>itability <strong>of</strong> Pigeon Pea–Vegetable Mustard–Okra<br />
Cropping System as Influenced by Enriched Organic Formulations<br />
Kamal Garg and Shiva Dhar<br />
ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, 110 012, India<br />
India has made spectacular breakthrough in production and consumption <strong>of</strong> fertilizers during<br />
last four decades. However, the imbalanced and continuous use <strong>of</strong> chemical fertilizers in<br />
intensive cropping system has led to reduction in the crop yields and resulted in imbalance <strong>of</strong><br />
nutrients in soil which has adverse effect on soil physico-chemical properties. Due to the<br />
dramatic rise in prices for commercial fertilizers, search for alternative sources <strong>of</strong> plant<br />
nutrients has become increasingly important, particularly for resource poor farmers <strong>of</strong> South<br />
Asia. Use <strong>of</strong> organics build up the soil humus improving the soil physical and biological<br />
properties. Therefore, organic nutrient management systems are needed to maintain agricultural<br />
productivity and protect the environment. Moreover, raw materials required to make FYM are<br />
easily available to farmers. The conversion <strong>of</strong> rice straw into value-added compost may have<br />
the potential to improve productivity <strong>of</strong> the crops and reduce environmental pollution as well<br />
as loss <strong>of</strong> plant nutrients and organic matter. Ashes from combustion <strong>of</strong> biomass are the oldest<br />
mineral fertilizers in the world. Biomass ashes are nearly free <strong>of</strong> N but contain significant<br />
quantities <strong>of</strong> P, K, Ca, Mg and micronutrients essential for plant nutrition (Bhattacharya et al.,<br />
2002). The potato peel manure is very useful for farmers because NPK content was gradually<br />
increased in the soil. The integration <strong>of</strong> organic manures and composts <strong>of</strong> residues <strong>of</strong> various<br />
crops available with farmers would be able to maintain soil fertility as well as sustain crop<br />
productivity. Hence, the present investigation was conducted with the objective to find out the<br />
effect <strong>of</strong> enriched organic formulations on productivity and pr<strong>of</strong>itability <strong>of</strong> pigeon pea–<br />
vegetable mustard–okra cropping system for achieving higher yield and economics.<br />
Methodology<br />
A field experiment was conducted during the rainy (kharif), winter (rabi) and summer seasons<br />
<strong>of</strong> 2020–21 and 2021–22 at the research farm <strong>of</strong> Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New<br />
Delhi. The experiment comprised <strong>of</strong> one cropping system (pigeon pea–vegetable mustard–<br />
okra) and seven nutrient sources viz., control, 100% RDN through FYM, 100% RDN through<br />
improved RRC, 100% RDN through PHA-based formulation, 75% RDN through PHA-based<br />
formulation, 100% RDN through PPC-based formulation and 75% RDN through PPC-based<br />
formulation were tested in randomized block design with three replications. The pigeon pea<br />
variety ‘Pusa Arhar 16’, vegetable mustard cultivar ‘Pusa sag 1’, and okra variety ‘Pusa Bhindi<br />
5’ were taken in the experiment. The RDN <strong>of</strong> pigeon pea, vegetable mustard, and okra were 30,<br />
80, and 100 kg N ha -1 respectively. Pigeon pea was sown in the first week <strong>of</strong> July and<br />
218 | Page<br />
Ecosystem based approaches for climate change adaptation, ecosystem services, integrated farming system models, Land<br />
degradation neutrality
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
harvested in the first week <strong>of</strong> November. Vegetable mustard was sown in the second week <strong>of</strong><br />
November and harvested in the third week <strong>of</strong> January. Okra was planted in the first week <strong>of</strong><br />
March and harvested in the second fortnight <strong>of</strong> May during both tears <strong>of</strong> experimentation. After<br />
harvesting, threshing, cleaning, and drying, the seed yield <strong>of</strong> crops was estimated. Economic<br />
yields <strong>of</strong> the component crops were converted to pigeon pea-equivalent yield (PPEY),<br />
considering the prevailing minimum support price (MSP)/market prices <strong>of</strong> the crops. System<br />
productivity was calculated by adding the PPEY <strong>of</strong> the component crops. Production efficiency<br />
in economic terms was calculated by taking system net returns and the B: C ratio. The data<br />
obtained from the study for two years were analyzed statistically using the F–test.<br />
Results<br />
The yield <strong>of</strong> component crops <strong>of</strong> the system expressed as pigeon pea equivalent yield (PPEY)<br />
under various enriched organic formulations. Among the treatments, the application <strong>of</strong> 100%<br />
RDN through PHA-based formulation registered significantly highest PPEY (8.70 t ha -1 and<br />
8.97 t ha -1 ) over other treatments which was statistically on par with 100% RDN through PPCbased<br />
formulation and FYM during both the years <strong>of</strong> study. However, the treatment receiving<br />
100% RDN through improved RRC were also found statistically similar to 75% RDN through<br />
PHA-based formulation and PPC-based formulation. The application <strong>of</strong> 100% RDN through<br />
PHA-based formulation increased the PPEY to the extent <strong>of</strong> 53.5 per cent during 2020-21 and<br />
55.0 per cent during 2021-22, respectively over control. This might be due to balanced supply<br />
<strong>of</strong> nutrients to the crops throughout the crop growth period as FYM undergo decomposition<br />
during which series <strong>of</strong> nutrient transformation takes place and helps in their higher availability<br />
to the crops. Higher uptake <strong>of</strong> nutrients by the crops will result in higher yield.<br />
Production economics <strong>of</strong> cropping systems under various enriched organic formulations have<br />
been presented in Table. Critical examination <strong>of</strong> data revealed that application <strong>of</strong> 100% RDN<br />
through PHA-based formulation gave significantly maximum system net returns and B: C ratio<br />
(Rs.553.6 x10 3 ha -1 and Rs.567.8 x10 3 ha -1 ; 4.96 and 4.94 during 2020–21 and 2021–22,<br />
respectively), which remained statistically similar to 100% RDN through PPC-based<br />
formulation and FYM during both the years. Higher returns under PHA-based formulation<br />
might be due to the higher yield obtained from FYM coupled with a relatively lower cost <strong>of</strong><br />
FYM during both years which had increased the net returns during both years.<br />
Conclusion<br />
Based on the results <strong>of</strong> the present study, it can be concluded that the application <strong>of</strong><br />
organic nutrient sources at 100% recommended dose <strong>of</strong> nitrogen through PHA-based<br />
formulation was found to be most effective in achieving higher productivity and pr<strong>of</strong>itability<br />
in pigeon pea–vegetable mustard–okra cropping system.<br />
Ecosystem based approaches for climate change adaptation, ecosystem services, integrated farming system<br />
models, Land degradation neutrality<br />
219 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
References<br />
Bhattacharya, S.S. and Chattopadhyay, G.N. 2002. Increasing bioavailability <strong>of</strong> phosphorus<br />
from fly ash through vermicomposting. J. Environ. Qual. 31(6): 2116–2119.<br />
Effect <strong>of</strong> enriched organic formulations on system productivity and economics <strong>of</strong> pigeon<br />
pea–vegetable mustard–okra cropping system<br />
Treatment<br />
Pigeon pea<br />
equivalent yield<br />
(PPEY, t ha -1 )<br />
Net returns<br />
(x10 3 ₹ ha -1 )<br />
B: C ratio<br />
2020-21 2021-22 2020-21 2021-22 2020-21 2021-22<br />
Control 6.09 6.31 356.8 368.3 4.10 4.10<br />
FYM 8.40 8.68 528.1 540.6 4.85 4.81<br />
Improved RRC 7.45 7.77 4465 464.7 3.94 4.03<br />
PHA based formulation (100%<br />
RDN) 8.70 8.97 553.6 567.8 4.96 4.94<br />
PHA based formulation (75% RDN) 7.33 7.67 447.1 466.4 4.26 4.29<br />
PPC based formulation (100% RDN) 8.50 8.77 537.0 550.3 4.89 4.85<br />
PPC based formulation (75% RDN) 7.17 7.42 432.3 445.7 4.20 4.18<br />
SEm ± 0.22 0.22 12.2 12.1 0.13 0.13<br />
LSD (P=0.05) 0.67 0.66 37.6 37.4 0.41 0.39<br />
FYM, Farm yard manure; RRC, Rice residue compost; PHA, Paddy husk ash; PPC, Potato peel compost<br />
T2-30P-1570<br />
Deep Liter Pig Housin- A Venture for Minimizing Winter Stress and other<br />
Health Managemental Issues in Piggery Farming in West Jaintia Hill<br />
District <strong>of</strong> Meghalaya<br />
Rimiki Suchiang, Dodo Paswet, Banylla Kharbamon, Alethea Dympep, Risakaru<br />
Lyngdoh, Marbiangdor Mawlong, Jaseama K. Marak and Firstborn Sutnga<br />
KVK Jaintia Hills, Moopun,Wahiajer<br />
West Jaintiahills , Meghalaya<br />
kvkjaintiahills@gmail.com<br />
Piggery farming is a growing industry in Meghalaya with pork being the most preferred meat<br />
in the state and <strong>of</strong>fers a major source <strong>of</strong> livelihood for most <strong>of</strong> the rural people. However, there<br />
are various constraints inhibiting the growth <strong>of</strong> this enterprise such as improper housing<br />
management and health management issues. in order to address this constraint, kvk jaintia hills<br />
since the year 2019 has taken up a technology on construction <strong>of</strong> deep liter pig shed in order to<br />
tackle winter stress in pigs by maintaining a comfort zone for the pigs which was well suited<br />
220 | Page<br />
Ecosystem based approaches for climate change adaptation, ecosystem services, integrated farming system models, Land<br />
degradation neutrality
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
for physiological adaptation during extreme weather events. The marketable body weight was<br />
80-90 kg and there is a reduction in lameness by 6.6%, skin diseases by 25.5 %, diarrhea by<br />
15.2% and respiratory problem by 7.2 %. The average temperature <strong>of</strong> the shed recorded during<br />
peak winter months was within the range <strong>of</strong> 20-23 o C<br />
T2-31P<br />
Indigenous Multi Cropping Systems <strong>of</strong> Rainfed Areas: A Present from the<br />
Past to the Future<br />
Prachi D. Patil, Swaran Viswanathan, Ravindra Adusumilli, Shailesh Vyas, Soumik<br />
Banerjee, Lokappa Nayak, K. Phaneesh, P. Vipindas, Shamika Mone, Tarak Kate,<br />
Siddhesh Sakore, Pramel Kumar, Ritesh Guage, Deepak Sharma, Luna Panda<br />
WASSAN, Hyderabad<br />
The unprecedented heat waves across wheat-growing areas and drought in Indo Gangetic<br />
Plains hit the exports <strong>of</strong> wheat and rice badly during the year 2022. These events have exposed<br />
the vulnerabilities <strong>of</strong> rice and wheat - India’s two major cereal crops to a changing climate.<br />
Experiences from the green revolution belts <strong>of</strong> Punjab and the Ingo Gangetic Plains draw our<br />
attention to the rainfed agriculture areas. Despite constituting about 68% and 48% <strong>of</strong> the<br />
cropped area under non-food and food crops, rainfed agriculture is yet to garner the public and<br />
policy maker's imagination. India’s traditional rainfed multi-cropping systems are more<br />
climate resilient. The inherent diversity and rich complementary crop combination- <strong>of</strong> cereals,<br />
millets, pulses, oilseeds, and vegetables, grown on the same piece <strong>of</strong> land at the same time<br />
inbuild resilience to climate variability.<br />
An exploratory research study on documenting traditional multi-crop systems was conducted<br />
under the University <strong>of</strong> Cambridge’s project <strong>of</strong> Transforming India's Green Revolution by<br />
Research and Empowerment for Sustainable food Supplies (TIGR2ESS) across nine states <strong>of</strong><br />
India in 2022. Twelve different traditional rainfed multi-cropping systems across eight<br />
agroecological zones were studied. The concept was to explore their potential in sustaining<br />
crop diversity and soil health, provisioning nutrition-rich food and feed, and climate resilience.<br />
These twelve systems are Kurwa (Jharkhand), Misa Chasa (Odisha), Navadhanya (Andhra<br />
Pradesh), Punam Krishi/Ponam Kuthu and Purayida Krishi (Kerala), Akkadi Salu (Karnataka),<br />
Baradhanya and Pata (Maharashtra), Olya and Sat Gajara (Madhya Pradesh), Rammol<br />
(Gujarat) and Hangari Kheti (Rajasthan).<br />
The mix <strong>of</strong> crops, their ratios, layout <strong>of</strong> the field, agronomic practices and flow <strong>of</strong> dietary<br />
nutrients to households, and their time trends was documented using multiple research methods.<br />
Ecosystem based approaches for climate change adaptation, ecosystem services, integrated farming system<br />
models, Land degradation neutrality<br />
221 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
T2-32P<br />
A Review Article on Comparative Performance <strong>of</strong> Vanaraja and Indigenous<br />
Chicken under Backyard System <strong>of</strong> Rearing<br />
Nunni Tayeng, Neeta Lengjam, S. M. Hussain and R.K. Salam*<br />
KVK-East Siang, CHF, CAU, Pasighat, Arunachal Pradesh, India<br />
* rubu28903@gmail.com<br />
Silluk is an interior most village <strong>of</strong> East Siang district with a 27 0 43 ’_ 29 0 20 ’ N latitude and94 0<br />
42 ’ -95 0 35 ’ E longitude with an elevation from 130 to 752 MSL. The population is nonvegetarian<br />
and prefers meat products in the diet. Furthermore, though indigenous birds are<br />
hardy, resistant to common avian disease and adopt well in adverse climatic condition, their<br />
productivity is much lower due to poor genetic potential, hence reducing the market potential<br />
as well as opportunity for extra income. Keeping these points in view KVK East Siang under<br />
NICRA project initiated an intervention <strong>of</strong> introducing backyard poultry rearing with Vanaraja,<br />
a dual-purpose high yielding chicken developed by Project Directorate <strong>of</strong> Poultry, Hyderabad<br />
and successfully introduced in various parts <strong>of</strong> our country. The information on performance <strong>of</strong><br />
the Vanaraja against indigenous birds in backyard rearing system is scarce and disorganized<br />
for the north eastern region, especially for subtropical regions like that <strong>of</strong> Silluk village in East<br />
Siang District <strong>of</strong> Arunachal Pradesh. However, KVK-East Siang, has successfully conducted<br />
Front Line demonstrations on Vanaraja birds in backyard systems in villages <strong>of</strong> East Siang<br />
District (APR; 2015-2016, 2016-2017 and 2019-2020) concluded farmers showed great<br />
satisfaction for Vanaraja Bird and also recommended to be popularized in every villages <strong>of</strong> the<br />
district. Additionally, in the state <strong>of</strong> Assam some comparative performance <strong>of</strong> Vanaraja and<br />
indigenous chicken under backyard system studies have revealed that overall mean body<br />
weight, egg production and egg weights were significantly higher in Vanaraja in compare to<br />
indigenous birds. Also, in states like Nagaland and Mizoram with similar sub-tropical agroecosystem,<br />
the studies to analyze the backyard poultry production system practiced by the<br />
tribal farmers found that the traditional free range poultry production can possibly be improved<br />
through the use <strong>of</strong> dual-purpose birds like Vanaraja. All these studies show that the present<br />
intervention to be concluded in Silluk Village has a promising result to look forward to.<br />
Directed Seeded Rice: Prospects, Constraints and Researchable Issue<br />
T2-33P<br />
Satyendra Pal Singh and Awdhesh Singh<br />
RVSKVV-Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Lahar (Bhind) M.P.<br />
Rice (Organ Sativa) is one <strong>of</strong> the most important food crops in the world and staple food for<br />
more than 50 percent <strong>of</strong> the global population. Being the major sources <strong>of</strong> food after wheat, it<br />
meets 43 percent <strong>of</strong> calorie requirement <strong>of</strong> more than two third <strong>of</strong> the Indian population. In<br />
222 | Page<br />
Ecosystem based approaches for climate change adaptation, ecosystem services, integrated farming system models, Land<br />
degradation neutrality
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
India rice is grown on an area <strong>of</strong> about 43.5 million ha with a total population <strong>of</strong> 105.5 MT and<br />
productivity <strong>of</strong> 2.4 tons per ha during 2014-15. Increasing water scarcity, water loving nation<br />
<strong>of</strong> rice cultivation and increasing labour wages triggers the search for alternative crop<br />
establishment method which can increase water productivity. In traditional rice cultivation, rice<br />
is sprouted in a nursery. Sprouted seedlings are then transplanted into standing water with<br />
direct seedling, rice seed is sown and sprouted directly into the field, eliminating the laborious<br />
process <strong>of</strong> planting seedlings by hand and greatly reducing the crops water requirement. Direct<br />
seeded crops require less labour and tend to mature faster than transplanted crops.<br />
Conventional method <strong>of</strong> rice growing which is not only intensive water user but also<br />
cumbersome and laborious. Different problems like lowering water table, scarcity <strong>of</strong> labour<br />
during peak periods, deteriorating soil health demands some alternative establishment method<br />
to sustain productivity <strong>of</strong> rice as well as natural resources direct seeded rice, the olds method <strong>of</strong><br />
crop establishment, is gaining popularity because <strong>of</strong> its low-input demand. It saves labour,<br />
requires less water, less drudgery, early crop maturity, low production cost, better soil physical<br />
conditions for following crops and less methane emission, provides better option to be the best<br />
fit in different cropping systems. There are several constraints associated with shift PTR to<br />
DSR, such as high weed infestation, evaluation <strong>of</strong> weedy rice, increase in soil borne pathogens,<br />
nutrient disorders, poor crop establishment, lodging, incidence <strong>of</strong> blast, brown leaf spot etc. by<br />
overcoming these constraints DSR can prone to be a very promising, technically and<br />
economically feasible alternative to PTR.<br />
Ecosystem-based Adaptation for Increased Agricultural Productivity<br />
through Smallholder Farmers in Ratlam District (M.P.)<br />
Gyanendra Pratap Tiwari, SarveshTripathy* and Jitendra Bhandari<br />
Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Jaora, Ratlam (M.P.)-457001<br />
*sarveshtripathy@gmail.com<br />
T2-34P<br />
The impacts <strong>of</strong> climate change are evident in the agriculture sector in India. These impacts are<br />
more severe and pronounced in a dry district like Ratlam due to the high reliance on agroeconomy<br />
and subsistence-based livelihoods by smallholder farmers that increase vulnerability<br />
and risks. This paper evaluated performance <strong>of</strong> BBF (Broad Bed Furrow), improved variety,<br />
soil test based nutrient management system and integrated pest and diseases management, by<br />
comparing their efficacy in terms <strong>of</strong> yield and reduction in disease pest problems.<br />
Methodology<br />
The trial was conducted in NICRA-adopted village <strong>of</strong> Ratlam district during 2020-21 and<br />
2021-22on farmer’s field in soybean, chickpea and wheat crop. Before and after comparisons<br />
Ecosystem based approaches for climate change adaptation, ecosystem services, integrated farming system<br />
models, Land degradation neutrality<br />
223 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
on various variables were obtained with the help <strong>of</strong> baseline data and recall memories <strong>of</strong><br />
respondents.<br />
Results<br />
The result was shows 25.93% yield increase in soybean due to introduction <strong>of</strong> extra early,<br />
thermo-insensitive, multiple resistant and high yielding variety JS-2034, over traditional<br />
practice with use <strong>of</strong> broad bed furrow (BBF) technology in Kharif season. Similarly in rabi<br />
season- heat tolerant, wilt resistance and high yielding variety chickpea variety RVG-202 has<br />
given higher yield <strong>of</strong> 19.8 % over traditional practice with use <strong>of</strong> BBF technology. Improved<br />
high yielding and heat tolerant wheat variety HI-1605 given higher yield <strong>of</strong> 23.57 %<br />
comparison to traditional variety LOK-1 with use <strong>of</strong> line show technology. These findings<br />
suggest that traditionally used practices have scientific basis and <strong>of</strong>fer simple, affordable and<br />
climate friendly practices to improve the health <strong>of</strong> agro-ecosystem while supporting<br />
smallholder farmers to adapt to adverse impacts <strong>of</strong> climate change and build socio-ecological<br />
resilience. These practices can be also customized depending on the local context for wider<br />
adoption and scaling. Similar result were also found by Aggarwal P. K. (2003), Das et al.<br />
(2012 & 2014), Jasna et al. (2017), Parry et al. (2017) and Sonune & Mane (2018).<br />
Impact <strong>of</strong> climate change on productivity <strong>of</strong> soybean, chickpea and wheat.<br />
Treatment Year Variety Seed Yield<br />
(Kg/ ha)<br />
Gross returns<br />
(Rs/ha)<br />
Net returns<br />
(Rs/ha)<br />
B:C ratio<br />
IP 2020-21 JS-2034 16.74 64951 38554 1.46<br />
FP 2020-21 Local 13.30 51604 27546 1.14<br />
IP 2021-22 JS-2034 15.48 61146 36428 1.47<br />
FP 2021-22 Local 12.31 48624 27412 1.29<br />
IP 2020-21 RVG-202 14.81 75531 52411 2.27<br />
FP 2020-21 Local 12.37 63087 40452 1.79<br />
IP 2021-22 RVG-202 14.68 76776 51436 2.03<br />
FP 2021-22 Local 12.26 64119 41578 1.84<br />
IP 2020-21 HI-1605 38.28 75603 47854 1.72<br />
FP 2020-21 LOK-1 30.98 61185 35478 1.38<br />
IP 2021-22 HI-1605 35.29 71109 45263 1.75<br />
FP 2021-22 LOK-1 28.56 57548 34145 1.46<br />
IP: Improved practice; FP: Farmers’ practice<br />
Conclusion<br />
Broad Bed and Furrow technique and stress tolerant cultivars can play an important role in<br />
coping with climate variability as well as enhancing the productivity. These findings suggest<br />
that traditionally used practices have scientific basis and <strong>of</strong>fer simple, affordable and climate<br />
224 | Page<br />
Ecosystem based approaches for climate change adaptation, ecosystem services, integrated farming system models, Land<br />
degradation neutrality
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
friendly practices to improve the health <strong>of</strong> agro-ecosystem while supporting smallholder<br />
farmers to adapt to adverse impacts <strong>of</strong> climate change and build socio-ecological resilience.<br />
These practices can be also customized depending on the local context for wider adoption and<br />
scaling.<br />
References<br />
Aggarwal, P. K. 2003. Impact <strong>of</strong> climate change on Indian agt1culture. J. Pl. Bio. 30: 189-98.<br />
Das, A., Patel, D.P., Munda, G.C., Ramkrushna, G.I., Kumar, M. and Ngachan, S.V. 2014.<br />
Improving productivity, water and energy use efficiency in lowland rice (Oryza sativa)<br />
through appropriate establishment methods and nutrient management practices in the<br />
mid-altitude <strong>of</strong> north-east India. Exp. Agric. 50(3): 353–375.<br />
Jasna, V.K., Burman, R.R., Padaria, R.N., Sharma, J.P., Varghese, E., Chakrabarti, B. and<br />
Dixit, S. 2017. Impact <strong>of</strong> climate resilient technologies in rainfed agroecosystem. Ind. J.<br />
Agric. Sci. 87(6): 816–824.<br />
Parry, M. L. and Carter, T.R. 1989. The impact <strong>of</strong> climate change on agriculture. In: Coping<br />
with Climate Change. Proceedings <strong>of</strong> the 2nd North American Conference on Preparing<br />
for Climate Change, Topping JC (ed). Climate Institute, Washington, DC, pp. 180–184.<br />
Sonune, S.V. and Mane, S.B. 2018. Impact <strong>of</strong> climate resilient varieties on crop productivity<br />
in NICRA village. J. Pharmacog. Phytochem. 1(special): 3210-3212.<br />
Wezel, A., Casagrande, M., Celette, F., Vian, J.F., Ferrer, A. and Peigne, J. 2014.<br />
Agroecological practices for sustainable agriculture- a review. Agron. Sust. Dev. 34: 1–<br />
20.<br />
Effect <strong>of</strong> Different Legumes in Legume-Castor Relay Cropping System<br />
S. P. Deshmukh*, V. Surve, T. U. Patel, H. H. Patel and D. D. Patel<br />
College <strong>of</strong> Agriculture, Navsari Agricultural University, Bharuch, Gujarat – 392 012<br />
*swapnildeshmukh@nau.in<br />
Ecosystem based approaches for climate change adaptation, ecosystem services, integrated farming system<br />
models, Land degradation neutrality<br />
225 | Page<br />
T2-35P<br />
In the scenario <strong>of</strong> conventional farming system, limited chances are available to cope with<br />
sustainability and productivity issues at the same time. Relay cropping may play a crucial role<br />
in tackling this concern, by increasing the sustainability with minimum tillage, continuous soil<br />
cover along with increase in land productivity. Lot <strong>of</strong> studies already reflected the benefits to<br />
crops sown after legume crop, so more emphasis was given in this study to directly relate the<br />
research towards a best choice <strong>of</strong> legumes for relay cropping in castor crop. With these<br />
thoughts this research was framed to study different legume-castor relay cropping systems<br />
viz.,greengram-castor, clusterbean (veg)- castor, blackgram-castor, cowpea-castor and sole
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
castor (control). The results revealed that greengram-castor and blackgram-castor are the best<br />
identified relay cropping system for obtaining higher castor equivalent yield and monetary<br />
returns as per the three years <strong>of</strong> experimentation. However, the study also showed that legumecastor<br />
relay cropping gives more than two folds returns than sole castor.<br />
Effect <strong>of</strong> Seeding Rate on Seed Yield and Yield Components <strong>of</strong> Alfalfa<br />
(Medicago Sativa) for Minimizing Abiotic Stress<br />
T2-36P<br />
S. Iqbal, Z. A. Dar, M. Habeeb, S. Nassir, Z. Rashied, S. Basheer, S. Majeed, F. Rasool,<br />
E. Shanaz, A. Lone<br />
Dryland Agriculture Research Station, Rangreth, SKUAST-Kashmir<br />
A new look at the effect <strong>of</strong> seeding rates on long-term alfalfa seed production is necessary to<br />
see if reducing seeding rates is an economically viable option to reduce biotic stress and cut<br />
input costs, without sacrificing seed yield and income. At this time, a wide range <strong>of</strong> seeding<br />
rates is being used in Ladakh without evaluating their effects on seed yield and seed yield<br />
components <strong>of</strong> alfalfa. Therefore, the purpose <strong>of</strong> this study was to investigate the effect <strong>of</strong><br />
different seeding rates on seed yield and seed yield components <strong>of</strong> alfalfa in the Cold Arid<br />
Region <strong>of</strong> Ladakh. In this regard a field experiment was conducted at Mountain Agriculture<br />
Research and Extension Station Kargil (MAR&ES), Sub-station, SKUAST-K, to study the<br />
effect <strong>of</strong> seeding rate on seed yield and seed yield components <strong>of</strong> alfalfa (Medicago sativa) for<br />
two growing seasons. Seeding rate treatments were 2.5 kg ha -1 (SR 1<br />
), 5.0 kg ha -1 (SR 2<br />
), 7.5 kg<br />
ha -1 (SR 3<br />
), 10.0 kg ha -1 (SR 4<br />
) and 12.5 kg ha -1 (SR 5<br />
). Seed yield and seed yield components<br />
(number <strong>of</strong> pods per m 2 , number seeds per pod and 1000-seed weight) were determined for all<br />
treatments. The statistical results <strong>of</strong> the study indicated that seeding rate significantly (P =<br />
0.01) affected seed yield and number <strong>of</strong> pods per m 2 , but there was no significant difference in<br />
number seeds per pod and 1000-seed weight. The maximum value <strong>of</strong> seed yield (805.0 kg ha -1 )<br />
and number <strong>of</strong> pods per m 2 (6610) was obtained in case <strong>of</strong> SR 1<br />
treatment. Conversely, the<br />
minimum value <strong>of</strong> seed yield (605.7 kg ha -1 ) and number <strong>of</strong> pods per m 2 (4620) was observed<br />
in case <strong>of</strong> SR 5<br />
treatment. Therefore, 2.5 kg ha -1 was found to be more appropriate seeding rate<br />
in improving seed yield <strong>of</strong> alfalfa in the cold arid region <strong>of</strong> Ladakh.<br />
226 | Page<br />
Ecosystem based approaches for climate change adaptation, ecosystem services, integrated farming system models, Land<br />
degradation neutrality
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
T2-37P<br />
Impact <strong>of</strong> Climate Change on Pokkali Farming System<br />
S. P. Vikas* and Shinoj Subramannian<br />
ICAR-Krishi Vigyan Kendra (Ernakulam), ICAR- Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute,<br />
Narakkal, Kochi- 682 505, Kerala<br />
* vikaspattath@gmail.com<br />
Pokkali is a unique farming system in coastal areas <strong>of</strong> Ernakulam, Thrissur and Alappuzha<br />
districts <strong>of</strong> Kerala where paddy and shrimp are cultivated alternatively in the same field.<br />
Uniqueness <strong>of</strong> this farming system is that the paddy is saline tolerant and there is no external<br />
inputs required either as fertilizer for paddy or feed for shrimp. The maximum salinity during<br />
paddy crop that is raised during June to September is 4 ppt and maximum salinity during<br />
shrimp crop that is raised during November to May is 30 ppt. The timing <strong>of</strong> both paddy crop<br />
and shrimp crop is critical as optimum levels <strong>of</strong> salinity and water quality are essential for<br />
successful crop. Monsoon showers normally occurring during the first week <strong>of</strong> June every year<br />
flush out salt accumulation in soil and bring down the salinity to safer levels to facilitate<br />
sprouting <strong>of</strong> paddy seeds. Subsequent to sowing, the water level in Pokkali fields is kept<br />
minimum by shutting down the field sluice gates till root development to prevent seeds getting<br />
washed away. The production from Pokkali fields reduced considerably in recent years. The<br />
cost <strong>of</strong> production also increased and the Pokkali farming became no longer pr<strong>of</strong>itable. In this<br />
context, a survey was conducted to examine the impact <strong>of</strong> climatic atrocities on these<br />
developments. The area selected was Kadamakkudy and Karumallur panchayaths in Ernakulam<br />
district <strong>of</strong> Kerala. The monsoon showers delayed by 3 to5 weeks during the past four years<br />
resulted corresponding delay in paddy sowing pushing the cropping period to July to October.<br />
This caused exposure <strong>of</strong> paddy crop to higher salinities upto 6 ppt resulting stress to the crop<br />
and reduced production. The average production <strong>of</strong> eight quintals per acre paddy dropped to<br />
5.5 quintals per acre. The subsequent shrimp farming also affected due to the delay. The<br />
average production <strong>of</strong> 3.6 quintals per acre dropped to 1.2 quintals per acre. Another issue<br />
expressed by the farmers is that the seeds are washed out in flash floods. There were times in<br />
these four years when the sowing had to be repeated upto three times incurring additional<br />
expenses. The seed cost per acre is Rs.2,700/-.<br />
Ecosystem based approaches for climate change adaptation, ecosystem services, integrated farming system<br />
models, Land degradation neutrality<br />
227 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Impact <strong>of</strong> Front-Line Demonstration on the Yield and Economics <strong>of</strong><br />
Coriander under TDC- NICRA in Kota District <strong>of</strong> Rajasthan, India<br />
Dilip Matwa 1* , C.L. Meena 1 , P.P. Rohilla 2 , Mahendra Singh 2 , and R.R. Meena 2<br />
T2-38P<br />
1 ICAR-Agriculture Technology Application Research Institute Zone-II, Jodhpur, Rajasthan-344001,<br />
2 Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Borkhera, Kota Agriculture University, Kota, Rajasthan-3240011,<br />
*dilip93matwa@gmail.com<br />
The study was carried out in National Innovations in Climate Resilient Agriculture (NICRA-<br />
TDC) Project village Chomakot <strong>of</strong> Kota district during 2011-12-13 to 2019-20. Total 184 front<br />
line demonstrations (FLDs) were conducted on coriander (Coriandrum sativum) in 92.6 ha by<br />
the active participation <strong>of</strong> the farmers with the objective <strong>of</strong> improved technologies <strong>of</strong> coriander<br />
production potentials. The improved technologies consist performance <strong>of</strong> high yielder<br />
&climate resilient varieties viz.RCr-436, RKD-18, balanced fertilizers (soil test based)<br />
application and integrated disease and pest management. The demonstrated recorded an<br />
average yield ranging from 875 kg to 2225 kgha -1 with a mean <strong>of</strong> 1602 kgha -1 . The per cent<br />
increase yield in demonstration ranged from 9.46% to 36.08% with a mean <strong>of</strong> 14.18 % in the<br />
respective years. The average demonstrated field gave higher net returns <strong>of</strong> Rs. 57383.56ha -<br />
1<br />
and B:C ratio 3.452., over control group i.e. Rs. 48639.56ha -1 with 3.259 B:C ratio from<br />
coriander variety, respectively. Present results clearly show that the yield and economics <strong>of</strong><br />
Coriander variety having low temperature stress & stem gall disease tolerance, higher yielding<br />
can be boost up by adoption <strong>of</strong> recommended technology in Kota district <strong>of</strong> Rajasthan.<br />
T2-39P<br />
Impact <strong>of</strong> Onset Date <strong>of</strong> Monsoon on Kharif Crops in Bhadohi District <strong>of</strong> UP<br />
Sarvesh Baranwal*, Vishvendu Dwivedi, Rudal Prasad Chaudhary, G.K. Chaudhory<br />
ICAR-IIVR-KVK Bhadohi, UP, India<br />
*sarveshbaranwal@gmail.com<br />
Inter and intra seasonal fluctuation in climate has a significant impact on the sowing <strong>of</strong> crops.<br />
Climate change is now a reality as evident from the significant increase in CO2 concentration<br />
and global mean temperature. increasing levels <strong>of</strong> GHGs alter the energy balance between the<br />
atmosphere and the earth’s surface, in turn, the instability <strong>of</strong> monsoon. Monsoon plays a<br />
pivotal role in the sustenance <strong>of</strong> India's food & water security, prosperity and agro-ecological<br />
systems. An estimated ∼60% <strong>of</strong> the total population in the Indian subcontinent is dependent on<br />
monsoon rainfall. The fluctuations and changes in Indian monsoon rainfall on spatial and<br />
228 | Page<br />
Ecosystem based approaches for climate change adaptation, ecosystem services, integrated farming system models, Land<br />
degradation neutrality
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
temporal scale is closely linked to cropping pattern. Monsoon rain govern the sowing area <strong>of</strong><br />
crop in kharif season. Over the years, it has been directly experienced that the erratic &<br />
irregular <strong>of</strong> monsoon entry at the district level is affecting the cropped area and its pattern.<br />
Premature and early arrival and late arrival <strong>of</strong> monsoon has been observed to affect the crops<br />
covered in the area. In the year 2021, monsoon onset started in second week <strong>of</strong> June in Bhadohi<br />
district <strong>of</strong> UP and their symmetrical contribution <strong>of</strong> rainfall (above normal rain) and 2 nd week<br />
<strong>of</strong> June monsoon onset in year 2021 boosted the area <strong>of</strong> paddy viz. 27397 ha and production<br />
was 84031 MT. Result concluded that onset <strong>of</strong> monsoon commencement date and monsoon<br />
pattern affected the area, production and productivity <strong>of</strong> kharif crops.<br />
T2-40P<br />
Integrated Farming System Module for Strengthening Traditional Rainfed<br />
IFS for Small and Marginal Farm Holdings in Southern Zone <strong>of</strong> Tamil Nadu<br />
G. Guru*, K. Baskar, S. Manoharan, V. Sanjivkumar and M. Manikandan<br />
AICRPDA Main Centre,Agricultural Research Station,Tamil Nadu Agricultural University,<br />
Kovilpatti- 628 501, Thoothukudi District, Tamil Nadu<br />
* gurusangeetha2005@gmail.com<br />
In general, in regions with rainfall <strong>of</strong> 500 to 700 mm, the farming systems should be based on<br />
livestock with promotion <strong>of</strong> low water requiring grasses, trees and bushes to meet fodder, fuel<br />
and timber requirements. In areas <strong>of</strong> 700 to 1100 mm rainfall, crop, horticulture and livestockbased<br />
farming systems can be adopted depending on the soil type and the marketability factors.<br />
Nearly 60% <strong>of</strong> the Indian population directly depends on agricultural activities as a source <strong>of</strong><br />
livelihood. Indian agriculture is dominated by small and marginal farmers (86%), having only<br />
44% <strong>of</strong> the total arable land (GOI, 2014). In 2010–2011, the average size <strong>of</strong> an operating land<br />
holding was 1.16 ha, and farm size has been further reduced due to fragmentation. The<br />
fragmentation <strong>of</strong> land resources is posing a serious threat to future sustainability, food security,<br />
and pr<strong>of</strong>itability <strong>of</strong> Indian farming. Due to these aberrations, farmers are unable to get<br />
sufficient income to sustain their family. The rising cost <strong>of</strong> food and energy, depleting water<br />
supply, diminishing farm size, soil degradation, imbalanced fertilizer use, excessive use <strong>of</strong><br />
agrochemicals, and climate change are all contributing to the problems <strong>of</strong> agricultural<br />
production system. Hence, the increasing area under agriculture to meet the burgeoning food<br />
demand is under threat. The modern agricultural production systems are simplified due to<br />
specialization and are intensified with high rates <strong>of</strong> external inputs to keep production<br />
conditions favourable and constant.<br />
Methodology<br />
In Thoothukudi district <strong>of</strong> Tamil Nadu with the mean annual rainfall is 711 mm, it was found<br />
that farmers with cropping activity alone incurred losses due to poor yield <strong>of</strong> maize, cotton and<br />
Ecosystem based approaches for climate change adaptation, ecosystem services, integrated farming system<br />
models, Land degradation neutrality<br />
229 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
pulses, sometimes even failure <strong>of</strong> crops, as a result <strong>of</strong> drought/prolonged dry spells during crop<br />
growing season. On farm studies indicated that inclusive <strong>of</strong> livestock (milch cow – cross bred<br />
jersey) farmers was benefited by getting additional income from milch animals and crop<br />
component. AICRPDA - Kovilpatti main centre is selected Thoothukudi district for rainfed<br />
integrated farming system activities. It is a preferred district where the centre is located with<br />
representation for rainfed condition. Kayathar and Kovilpatti blocks were selected randomly<br />
for the RIFS studies. These blocks having more area under rainfed conditions. Similarly, three<br />
villages are randomly selected from each <strong>of</strong> the selected block <strong>of</strong> the district. Priority was<br />
given to the villages in the following order: villages having less than 10 % irrigated area ><br />
villages having less than 20 % area > villages having less than 30 % irrigated area. AICRPDA,<br />
Kovilpatti main centre surveyed totally 240 respondents from two blocks (6 villages). Sum <strong>of</strong><br />
123 farmers under rainfed (RF) situation and 117 under partial irrigated (PIR) situation from 6<br />
villages <strong>of</strong> Thoothukudi district. Each 37 marginal farmers from RF and PIR, 40 small farmers<br />
from RF and 38 from PIR and 45 medium farmers from RF and 42 from PIR. Finally, 24<br />
farmers from Vadakupatti village <strong>of</strong> Kovilpatti were selected for implementing the on-farm<br />
research activity. Under each farming situations and farming systems, two farmers each in<br />
marginal, small and medium categories were selected to implement the RIFS activities.<br />
Results<br />
Among the module examined, the results revealed that in rainfed situation crop + large<br />
ruminant (milch cow-cross bred jersey) with intervention were recorded a maximum maize<br />
equivalent yield, net return and employment generation in marginal farm holdings (14423<br />
kgha -1 , Rs.119404 and 402 Man days) and small farm holdings (20407 kgha -1 , Rs.169253 and<br />
521 Man days)respectively over no intervention. In Partially Irrigated situation the module,<br />
crop + large ruminant (milch cow-cross bred jersey) with intervention were recorded a<br />
maximum Maize Equivalent Yield, Net Return and Employment generation in marginal farm<br />
holdings (25019 kgha -1 , Rs.193477 and 512 Man days) and small farm holdings (28557 kgha -1 ,<br />
Rs.267956 and 689 Man days )respectively over no intervention.<br />
Name <strong>of</strong> the farmer Area(ha) Livestock<br />
(Nos.)<br />
Mean data for the Year 2020 – 21 and 2021-22<br />
Maize<br />
equivalent<br />
yield(kg)<br />
Rainfed situation<br />
Marginal<br />
Cost <strong>of</strong><br />
cultivation/<br />
production<br />
(Rs)<br />
Net<br />
returns<br />
(Rs)<br />
Employment<br />
generation<br />
(man-days)<br />
With intervention 0.87 1.67 14423 146946 119404 402<br />
No intervention 0.85 1.67 9411 103147 53430 339<br />
Small<br />
With intervention 1.71 2.17 20407 187779 169253 521<br />
230 | Page<br />
Ecosystem based approaches for climate change adaptation, ecosystem services, integrated farming system models, Land<br />
degradation neutrality
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
No intervention 1.87 2.17 14239 151761 92443 482<br />
Partially irrigated situation<br />
Marginal<br />
With intervention 0.88 2.33 25019 185563 193477 512<br />
No intervention 0.90 2.33 12867 138225 84629 436<br />
Small<br />
With intervention 1.85 2.83 28557 245991 267956 689<br />
No intervention 1.52 2.83 19431 199875 143427 610<br />
Conclusion<br />
Among the rainfed and partially irrigated situations, under partially Irrigated with intervention<br />
was the best promising IFS, which generated the highest system productivity, employment<br />
generation and net returns over rainfed situation.<br />
References<br />
GOI. 2014. District Census Hand <strong>Book</strong>. Office <strong>of</strong> Registrar General and Census Commissioner<br />
<strong>of</strong> India, Ministry <strong>of</strong> Home Affairs, Government <strong>of</strong> India.<br />
Seasonal Growth Potential and Performance <strong>of</strong> Ramie Fodder Crop<br />
(Boehmeria nivea) Under Extreme Climatic Conditions in North India<br />
Ashutosh 1* , Ashish Kumar Singh 1 , Satish Kumar 2 and Anil Kumar 1<br />
1 Animal Physiology Division, ICAR-National Dairy Research Institute, Karnal-132 001, India<br />
2 Krishi Vigyan Kendra, ICAR-National Dairy Research Institute, Karnal-132 001, India<br />
* ludri_ludri@yahoo.co.in<br />
T2-41P<br />
The origin place <strong>of</strong> ramie is Malaysia. Ramie belongs to Urticaceae family & it is a perennial<br />
fodder and fibre crop grown in large areas <strong>of</strong> North Eastern states <strong>of</strong> India and Southeast Asian<br />
countries. The ramie plants have many herbal properties like vitamins, macro & micro minerals<br />
and other medicinal properties as per the available literature. The recent studies have shown<br />
that ramie has high content <strong>of</strong> protein and it provides around 21-25% crude protein. Out <strong>of</strong> the<br />
net sown area in country, 4.5% has been attributed to fodder crops. To satisfy the rapidly<br />
increasing demand <strong>of</strong> livestock products as well as to contribute to the government’s strategies<br />
to double the farmer’s income, it seems to be a need to increase the quantity and quality <strong>of</strong><br />
fodder to support livestock. Better the quality <strong>of</strong> fodder better will be the livestock<br />
productivity. At the current level <strong>of</strong> growth in forage resources, there will be 18.4% and 13.2%<br />
deficit in green and dry fodder respectively in the year 2050 as per the estimates <strong>of</strong> ICAR<br />
vision report 2050.The use <strong>of</strong> ramie as a fodder may also be cost effective for providing protein<br />
rich fodder to livestock species for enhancing productive performance as well as it will also<br />
Ecosystem based approaches for climate change adaptation, ecosystem services, integrated farming system<br />
models, Land degradation neutrality<br />
231 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
increase the income <strong>of</strong> farmers in the coming years in the harsh climatic condition specially<br />
during summer in North India. According to FAO (2005), ramie plants per hectare can produce<br />
up to 300 tons <strong>of</strong> fresh forage / year, equivalent to 42 tons <strong>of</strong> dry matter. Suryanah et al.,<br />
(2018) also reported based on the research conducted till now, the best cutting age for the ramie<br />
plant as a source <strong>of</strong> forage is at the age <strong>of</strong> 30 days.<br />
Methodology<br />
One trial in previously planted ramie (Boehmeria nivea) field was planned and designed for<br />
accessing the seasonal growth performance and other related parameters during winter season<br />
(December 2021), hot humid season (August, 2021) and hot dry season (April 2022) at ICAR<br />
NDRI, Karnal field area. The month <strong>of</strong> April 2022 was marked as the hottest month in last 122<br />
years and by chance the dates <strong>of</strong> trials fall in this duration hence the recorded data have<br />
additional importance. Three years back the ramie plants were propagated by stem cuttings,<br />
layering, division <strong>of</strong> parent root stalks or rhizome cutting 10 to 15 cm long and 15-20 cm deep<br />
Suckers and planted in rows 100 to 120 cm apart, with individual plants spaced 30 to 60 cm<br />
apart the rhizomes were planted on ridges to keep it safe from water logged situations. Under<br />
experiment 40 lines <strong>of</strong> well grown ramie plants were harvested 4 inch above the ground level<br />
in one day and from the very next day (1 st day <strong>of</strong> experiment), the recording <strong>of</strong> parameters like<br />
total biomass per line in grams, plant height in centimeters, number <strong>of</strong> leafs per plant and<br />
percent water content were recorded daily for each line for next 40 days continuously on same<br />
time <strong>of</strong> the day during the experiment period in different seasons.<br />
Results<br />
The data recorded and its graphical presentation is given below. The seasonal comparison on<br />
plant growth number <strong>of</strong> leafs cut plants individual bund weight and water content percent was<br />
done. The plant growth (height in centimeter) was found to be highest during the month <strong>of</strong><br />
April 2022(hot dry season) followed by August 2021(hot humid season) and lowest plant<br />
growth was recorded during December 2020-2021(winter season). During the trial <strong>of</strong> 40 days,<br />
the plant height was maximum at 40 th day which was 38.39cm in winter, 141.8 cm in July (hot<br />
season) and highest was in hot dry season, which indicates that ramie crop may be able to<br />
survive in high temperature and low humidity zones with regular irrigation facilities.<br />
The number <strong>of</strong> leafs per plant were highest during hot dry season as compared to winter and<br />
hot humid season. During hot dry season, the percent increase in number <strong>of</strong> leafs plants was<br />
lower as compared to hot dry season. The number <strong>of</strong> leafs remained 69.84% as compared to<br />
average value <strong>of</strong> 100%, whereas it was 81.62% in hot humid season whereas highest<br />
percentage number <strong>of</strong> leafs increased 148.3% as compared to the average scale <strong>of</strong> 100% that is<br />
around 1.5 times more than the average value, which clearly indicates that the average leaf<br />
232 | Page<br />
Ecosystem based approaches for climate change adaptation, ecosystem services, integrated farming system models, Land<br />
degradation neutrality
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
number was reduced to 30.16% in winter and 18.38% in hot humid season whereas 48.53%<br />
increases in hot dry seasons.<br />
Similarly, average bund weight for 40 days i.e. from day one to day 40 varied between 35.01<br />
grams (winter season), 523.86 grams (hot humid season) and highest was reported during hot<br />
dry season that is in March and April 2022(hottest in last 122 years).<br />
3000<br />
2500<br />
Average weight/ bund (gm) December<br />
Average weight/ bund (gm) April<br />
Average weight/ bund (gm) August<br />
Average weight/ bund (gm)<br />
2000<br />
1500<br />
1000<br />
500<br />
0<br />
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 2122 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40<br />
Percent Water Content<br />
100<br />
90<br />
80<br />
70<br />
60<br />
50<br />
40<br />
Plant water content (%) December<br />
Plant water content (%) August<br />
Plant water content (%) April<br />
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40<br />
Plant water content (in percent) remained between 75 to 85 percent, which indicates that crop<br />
was well adapted to maintain its water content as well as its dry matter content during first 22<br />
to 24 days during hot dry period, thereafter the water content starts declining from 75 to 45<br />
percent after 25 days onwards, may be due to more temperature and low humidity, which<br />
caused dehydration in plants and second reason may be the increases in fiber content (lignin<br />
content) <strong>of</strong> the plant days 25 onwards. Similar, trend was observed during the month <strong>of</strong><br />
December and plant water content declined from day 26 to 40 th day and ranged between 80.52<br />
to 66%.<br />
Conclusion<br />
In India under the changing climate scenario, green fodder production and its availability to the<br />
livestock round the year is a challenge particularly in India. The results <strong>of</strong> this experiment<br />
concluded that the ramie plant is capable <strong>of</strong> supplying green fodder round the year, during<br />
extreme climatic / environmental conditions round the year. The crop is capable <strong>of</strong> giving 12 to<br />
Ecosystem based approaches for climate change adaptation, ecosystem services, integrated farming system<br />
models, Land degradation neutrality<br />
233 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
14 cuts per year with excellent biomass productivity (around 2400-2600 quintals/acre/annum)<br />
upto next 10 to 12 years without involving cost on major field operations like ploughing,<br />
regular seed cost (sowing) and others. Only minor operations like weed removal or thinning <strong>of</strong><br />
old bunds and regular irrigations are required. Being the crop <strong>of</strong> South East Asia origin, which<br />
can only survive better in the hot humid zones/humid zones <strong>of</strong> the country need to be modified<br />
that this crop may also be grown in the areas with hot dry climatic conditions with exceeding<br />
maximum temperatures beyond 42 0 C. Therefore, more emphasis should be given on the<br />
production <strong>of</strong> alternate crops where ramie plants stand out to be a better option as dual-purpose<br />
crop for enhancing productivity <strong>of</strong> livestock species.<br />
References<br />
FAO. 2005. Animal Feed Resources Information System. Boehmeria nivea.<br />
http://www.fao.org/ag/aga/agap/frg/afris/Data/ 361.htm.<br />
ICAR (Indian Council <strong>of</strong> Agricultural Research). 2015. Vision 2050, Indian Council <strong>of</strong><br />
Agricultural Research, New Delhi<br />
Suryanah, S., Rochana, A., Susilawati, I. and Indiriani, N.P., 2018. Ramie (Boehmeria nivea)<br />
plant nutrient quality as feed forage at various cut ages. Animal Prod., 19(2):111-118.<br />
T2-42P-1679<br />
Impact <strong>of</strong> Adaptation Technologies on Resilience in Drought Prone Regions<br />
<strong>of</strong> Maharashtra, India<br />
J.V.N.S. Prasad 1* , K.K .Zade 2 , D.B. Devsarkar 3 , R. Rejani 1 , D.B.V. Ramana 1 , K. Sammi<br />
Reddy 1 , Lakhan Singh 4 , B.V.S. Kiran 1 , C.M. Pradeep 1 , Irfan Shaikh 2 , M. Prabhakar 1 ,<br />
V.K. Singh 1<br />
1 Indian Council <strong>of</strong> Agricultural Research (ICAR) - Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture<br />
(CRIDA) Hyderabad, India.<br />
2 Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Aurangabad, Vasantrao Naik Marathwada Krishi Vidyapeeth (VNMKV),<br />
Parbhani, Maharashtra, India.<br />
3 Director <strong>of</strong> Extension Education, VNMKV, Parbhani, Maharashtra, India.<br />
4 ICAR-Agricultural Technology Application Research Institute (ATARI), Pune, India.<br />
*jasti2008@gmail.com<br />
Climatic stresses such as frequent droughts, dry spells, floods, frost, cyclones, heat and cold<br />
waves significantly effect agriculture. Several districts <strong>of</strong> Maharashtra particularly in the<br />
Marathwada region, receive relatively low rainfall are frequently impacted by variable and low<br />
rainfall and <strong>of</strong>ten drought. Several technologies developed by the national agricultural research<br />
system can potentially minimise the impact <strong>of</strong> variable rainfall and drought. As part <strong>of</strong><br />
Technology Demonstration Component (TDC) <strong>of</strong> National Innovation on Climate Resilient<br />
234 | Page<br />
Ecosystem based approaches for climate change adaptation, ecosystem services, integrated farming system models, Land<br />
degradation neutrality
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Agriculture (NICRA), promising technologies which can minimise the impact <strong>of</strong> drought are<br />
demonstrated in 121 climatically vulnerable districts. The present study was takenup at Shekta<br />
Village <strong>of</strong> Aurangabad district <strong>of</strong> Maharashtra as representative location <strong>of</strong> drought to assess<br />
the performance <strong>of</strong> the climate resilient technologies during a drought year. A systematic frame<br />
work is developed to examine the performance <strong>of</strong> the climate resilient technologies in terms <strong>of</strong><br />
bio-physical yields and net returns during normal (2019-20) and drought (2018-19) years in<br />
comparison with the farmers’ practice. Adoption <strong>of</strong> the climate resilient technologies such as<br />
improved varieties, water management and livestock practices helped to increase the yield and<br />
income resilience compared to non-adopters during drought years. The extent <strong>of</strong> resilience<br />
achieved is highest from improved cultivars with supplemental irrigation which ranged from 25<br />
to 75% followed by livestock technologies which ranged from 89 to 112%. Adoption <strong>of</strong><br />
multiple enterprises such as crop + livestock + horticulture enhanced income and resilience<br />
upto 112% when compared to single enterprise. Study suggests that, enhancing water storage<br />
potential has created ample opportunities for increasing cropping intensification and to address<br />
the drought in low rainfall areas which further helps to enhance the resilience.<br />
Ecosystem based approaches for climate change adaptation, ecosystem services, integrated farming system<br />
models, Land degradation neutrality<br />
235 | Page
Theme– 2a<br />
Climate resilient agriculture for risk<br />
mitigation
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
236 | Page<br />
Theme-2a: Climate resilient agriculture for risk mitigation<br />
List <strong>of</strong> <strong>Extended</strong> Summaries<br />
S. No. Title First Author ID<br />
1 Economic impact <strong>of</strong> adoption <strong>of</strong> climate resilient<br />
technologies in drylands <strong>of</strong> Karnataka, India<br />
2 Enhancing water productivity in rainfed<br />
agriculture through in-situ and ex-situ rain water<br />
harvesting- NICRA experiences<br />
3 Climate Resilient technologies for sustainable<br />
farm incomes in Kurnool district <strong>of</strong> Andhra<br />
Pradesh<br />
4 Climate change adaptation models for the major<br />
farming system typologies in Sundarbans<br />
5 Crop production interventions for reducing the<br />
impact <strong>of</strong> changing climate in North East<br />
6 An integrated index <strong>of</strong> climate, carbon, yield, and<br />
sustainability for identification <strong>of</strong> resilient<br />
management options under cereal-based cropping<br />
system<br />
7 Evaluation <strong>of</strong> yield performance in high yielding<br />
finger millet varieties in NICRA Villages <strong>of</strong><br />
Ganjam<br />
8 Real-time contingency planning and preparedness<br />
to cope with weather aberrations in agriculture:<br />
Experiences from NICRA<br />
9 Performance <strong>of</strong> pigeon pea based intercropping<br />
systems under changing climatic conditions<br />
10 Does rise in atmospheric temperature and carbon<br />
dioxide adversely affect maize growth in acid<br />
soils <strong>of</strong> Northeast India?<br />
11 Environment-friendly utilization <strong>of</strong> basic slag and<br />
methanotroph to mitigate methane emission in<br />
lowland rice<br />
12 Sustainable intensification <strong>of</strong> rainfed lands<br />
through food-fodder based systems for climatic<br />
resilience and fodder security in semi-arid regions<br />
<strong>of</strong> India<br />
13 Characterizing different Indian farming systems to<br />
assess their resilience to climate change<br />
14 Impact <strong>of</strong> climate resilient interventions in<br />
NICRA village Rupana <strong>of</strong> Sirsa district in<br />
Haryana<br />
15 On-farm assessment <strong>of</strong> climate resilient<br />
interventions for sustaining crop productivity in<br />
rainfed eco-system<br />
Josily<br />
BV Asewar<br />
G Dhanalakshmi<br />
PK Garain<br />
T2a-01O-1095<br />
T2a-02O-1161<br />
T2a-03O-1238<br />
T2a-04O-1415<br />
Bagish Kumar T2a-05O -1509<br />
N Subhash<br />
S Mangaraj<br />
SB Patil<br />
M Sudhakar<br />
Ramesh<br />
Thangavel<br />
S Swain<br />
Sunil Kumar<br />
Abhilasha Singh<br />
DS Jakhar<br />
MS Pendke<br />
T2a-05aO-1339<br />
T2a-06R-1010<br />
T2a-07R-1054<br />
T2a-08R-1222<br />
T2a-09R-1224<br />
T2a-10R-1247<br />
T2a-11R-1300<br />
T2a-12R-1319<br />
T2a-13R-1587<br />
T2a-14P-1049<br />
Climate resilient agriculture for risk mitigation
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
16 Evaluation <strong>of</strong> mustard [Brassica juncea (L.)<br />
Czern and Coss] varieties to staggered sowing in<br />
changing climatic scenarios under custard apple<br />
based agri-horti system<br />
17 Assessment <strong>of</strong> different system <strong>of</strong> rice cultivation<br />
technique for combating climatic aberrations in<br />
rainfed medium land situation <strong>of</strong> Purulia district<br />
<strong>of</strong> West Bengal, India during kharif season<br />
18 Musk melon cultivation on reservoir basin: a<br />
climate smart and pr<strong>of</strong>itable farmer practice in<br />
arid zone <strong>of</strong> Rajasthan<br />
19 Effect <strong>of</strong> different types <strong>of</strong> mulching on growth<br />
and productivity <strong>of</strong> pointed gourd under stress<br />
climatic condition<br />
20 Demonstration <strong>of</strong> climate resilient practices to<br />
sustain crop productivity in various climatic<br />
vulnerability situations<br />
21 Makhana a highly pr<strong>of</strong>itable venture under flood<br />
prone waterlogged areas<br />
22 Effect <strong>of</strong> different sowing dates and nitrogen<br />
levels on the productivity <strong>of</strong> wet-seeded kharif<br />
rice under post-flood situation in Assam<br />
23 Effect <strong>of</strong> Black cumin (Nigella sativa) and Garlic<br />
(Allium sativum) as natural feed additive on<br />
growth performance <strong>of</strong> kaveri chicken<br />
24 Models <strong>of</strong> integrated farming systems resilient to<br />
soil erosion in a changing climate in<br />
mountain agriculture<br />
25 Effect <strong>of</strong> different planting dates and varieties on<br />
growth and yield <strong>of</strong> rice (Oryza Sativa) under<br />
irrigated subtropics <strong>of</strong> J&K UT<br />
26 Effect <strong>of</strong> in-situ moisture conservation measures<br />
and stress management practices on growth and<br />
productivity <strong>of</strong> rainfed cotton<br />
27 Enhancement in different cropping systems<br />
productivity and pr<strong>of</strong>itability under climate<br />
resilient agriculture (CRA)<br />
28 Crop water requirement and irrigation water<br />
management in changing climate for sugarcane<br />
crop in Baghpat district, U.P.<br />
29 Study <strong>of</strong> moth bean (Vigna aconitifolia) as a<br />
multifaceted climate resilient crop<br />
30 Dissemination <strong>of</strong> productivity enhancement<br />
technologies in pigeonpea through frontline<br />
demonstrations<br />
31 Demonstration <strong>of</strong> fish seed rearing in natural<br />
water bodies <strong>of</strong> rainfed agro-ecosystem: A case <strong>of</strong><br />
Climate resilient agriculture for risk mitigation<br />
Sudhir Kumar<br />
Rajpoot<br />
T2a-15P-1069<br />
SK Bhattacharya T2a-16P -1077<br />
Chandan Kumar<br />
C Saha Parya<br />
Rashid Khan<br />
Hemant Kumar<br />
Singh<br />
KS Teja<br />
GK Londhe<br />
BU Choudhury<br />
Monika Banotra<br />
Mohammed<br />
Ashraf<br />
Reeta Singh<br />
Gaurav Sharma<br />
G Gomadhi<br />
Debesh Singh<br />
Ch Balakrishna<br />
T2a-17P-1120<br />
T2a-18P-1206<br />
T2a-19P-1231<br />
T2a-20P-1239<br />
T2a-21P-1243<br />
T2a-22P-1248<br />
T2a-23P-1249<br />
T2a-24P-1308<br />
T2a-25P-1369<br />
T2a-26P-1385<br />
T2a-27P-1388<br />
T2a-28P-1422<br />
T2a-29P-1435<br />
T2a-30P-1468<br />
237 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
a farmer from Srikakulam, district <strong>of</strong> north coastal<br />
Andhra Pradesh<br />
32 Studies on the effect <strong>of</strong> rice varieties on flood<br />
tolerant in Karaikal District<br />
33 Crop diversification at agricultural landscape level<br />
for climate change adaptation in rainfed<br />
agroecosystems<br />
34 Demonstration <strong>of</strong> climate resilient technologies<br />
for mitigation in the North East<br />
35 Climate smart crop diversification through paddypea<br />
cropping system under raised beds in lowland<br />
rice fallow<br />
36 Impact <strong>of</strong> climatic variability on wheat varieties in<br />
NICRA villages <strong>of</strong> Kullu district <strong>of</strong> Himachal<br />
Pradesh<br />
37 Performance <strong>of</strong> climate resilient technology<br />
demonstrations in kullu district <strong>of</strong> Himachal<br />
Pradesh<br />
38 Studies on effect <strong>of</strong> weather on flowering and<br />
yield <strong>of</strong> mango<br />
39 Impact <strong>of</strong> technology demonstration through<br />
NICRA-interventions in Bhagalpur district <strong>of</strong><br />
Bihar<br />
40 Effect <strong>of</strong> Pusa Hydrogel on pearl millet crop yield<br />
under rainfed farming<br />
41 Impact <strong>of</strong> climate resilient practices on cabbage<br />
productivity in nicra villages <strong>of</strong> Tuensang district<br />
in Nagaland<br />
42 Enhance the climate resilience through rainfed<br />
agriculture under NICRA Project in Srikakulam<br />
district <strong>of</strong> north coastal AP<br />
V Aravinth<br />
G Ravindra<br />
Chary<br />
M Thoithoi Devi<br />
Meghna Sarma<br />
Subhash Kumar<br />
RK Rana<br />
AP Mallikarjuna<br />
Gowda<br />
Sailabala Dei<br />
Ramesh Kumar<br />
Pijush Kanti<br />
Biswas<br />
G Naveen Kumar<br />
T2a-31P-1469<br />
T2a-32P-1478<br />
T2a-33P-1508<br />
T2a-34P-1562<br />
T2a-35P-1568<br />
T2a-36P-1571<br />
T2a-37P-1576<br />
T2a-38P-1583<br />
T2a-39P<br />
T2a-40P-1566<br />
T2a-41P-1493<br />
238 | Page<br />
Climate resilient agriculture for risk mitigation
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
T2a-01O-1095<br />
Economic Impact <strong>of</strong> Adoption <strong>of</strong> Climate Resilient Technologies in<br />
Drylands <strong>of</strong> Karnataka, India<br />
Josily Samuel*, C.A. Rama Rao, B. M. K. Raju, N. Pushpanjali, Nagarjuna Kumar,<br />
A. Gopala Krishna Reddy, Anshida Beevi and V. K. Singh<br />
ICAR-Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, Hyderabad, Telangana 500059, India<br />
*s.josily@icar.gov.in<br />
Agriculture in India is largely rainfed with nearly 60 percent <strong>of</strong> the net sown area having no<br />
access to irrigation. In these regions, agriculture is dependent on monsoon rains which are<br />
known to be inadequate, erratic, and undependable. Despite the efforts to increase the<br />
productivity <strong>of</strong> rainfed drylands, continue to face food insecurity, and poverty and are<br />
vulnerable to climate change. Adoption <strong>of</strong> climate-resilient technologies (CRTs) is critical for<br />
securing income and improving the livelihoods <strong>of</strong> farmers specifically in vulnerable drylands.<br />
At the farm/household level, climate change impacts may reduce income level and stability,<br />
through effects on productivity, production costs, or prices (Komarek, 2020). Investing in<br />
resilient agricultural development is one <strong>of</strong> the important responses and the network program<br />
<strong>of</strong> the National Initiative on Climate Resilient Agriculture (NICRA) is an important program<br />
to build resilience. Location-specific climate-resilient interventions through the climateresilient<br />
villages (CRVs) and their impacts on farmer income need better assessment and<br />
quantification. The aim is to improve the resilience <strong>of</strong> Indian agriculture to climate change by<br />
demonstrating technologies or adaptation <strong>of</strong> crops and livestock and thereby upscaling<br />
technologies (Raju et al., 2021).<br />
Methodology<br />
This study brings out the impact adoption <strong>of</strong> CRTs on the farmers <strong>of</strong> NICRA-adopted<br />
villages using the difference-in-difference model and the impact <strong>of</strong> various socio-economic<br />
factors influencing farm income in Karnataka, India. A total <strong>of</strong> 120 households were<br />
surveyed based on a random sampling technique with 60 farm households each from the<br />
treated and control villages. Both treated and controlled villages are purposively kept within<br />
the same district. A detailed pre-tested questionnaire was used to collect data from both<br />
villages by experienced enumerators in the 2019-20 (Plate) household level, data on socioeconomic<br />
pr<strong>of</strong>ile, land endowments, cropping pattern, the composition <strong>of</strong> household income,<br />
and employment before and after NICRA intervention.<br />
Climate resilient agriculture for risk mitigation<br />
239 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Interaction with farmers <strong>of</strong> Kalaburagi district, Karnataka<br />
Results<br />
The study revealed that the NICRA village had higher cropping intensity and the major crops<br />
grown were rice, red gram, cotton, and other vegetables. The NICRA village had more than<br />
80 percent <strong>of</strong> the farm household income from agriculture while in the control village it was<br />
below 60 percent. The average income <strong>of</strong> a farm household in the NICRA village is more<br />
than 40 percent compared to the control village. The study confirms the impact <strong>of</strong> NICRA<br />
interventions. Impact evaluation must determine and must rely on tools and techniques to<br />
estimate the income change in the absence <strong>of</strong> the program (Samuel et al., 2021). The Double<br />
Difference (DD) model output showed that the farm income <strong>of</strong> treated villages was 40<br />
percent higher showing that better climate-smart interventions improved the farm incomes.<br />
Conclusion<br />
Adoption <strong>of</strong> climate resilient and improved technologies though may not directly improve<br />
crop income but may have an indirect impact on farm income and resource allocation.<br />
Farmers need to take adaptation measures and technologies at the farm level like changing<br />
enterprises, diversifying the farming systems, adopting new soil and water conservation<br />
measures, and sometimes moving into non-farm activities. In addition to these, extension and<br />
information delivery to farmers need to be prioritized.<br />
References<br />
Komarek, A.M., de Pinto, A. and Smith, V.H. 2020. A review <strong>of</strong> types <strong>of</strong> risks in agriculture:<br />
What we know and what we need to know. Agric. Syst. 178, 102738<br />
Raju, B.M.K., Josily Samuel, Jagriti Rohit, Anshida Beevi, C.N., Rama Rao, C.A., Prasad,<br />
J.V.N.S., Prabhakar, M., Ravindra Chary, G., Singh, V.K., Bhaskar, S. and<br />
Chaudhari, S.K. 2021. Mainstreaming Climate Resilient Agriculture Technologies<br />
into National Schemes and Development Programmes: Scope and Opportunities,<br />
240 | Page<br />
Climate resilient agriculture for risk mitigation
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
ICAR-Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, NICRA, ICAR-CRIDA,<br />
Hyderabad, P.110, ISBN: 978-93-80883-68-8<br />
Samuel, J., Rao, C. A. R., Raju, B. M. K., Reddy, A. A., Pushpanjali, Reddy, A. G. K.,<br />
Kumar, R. N., Osman, M., Singh, V.K. and Prasad, J.V.N.S. 2022. Assessing the<br />
impact <strong>of</strong> climate resilient technologies in minimizing drought impacts on farm<br />
incomes in drylands. Sustainability, 14, 382.<br />
T2a-02O-1161<br />
Enhancing Water Productivity in Rainfed Agriculture through in-situ and ex-situ Rain<br />
Water Harvesting- NICRA Experiences<br />
B.V. Asewar and M.S.Pendke<br />
Department <strong>of</strong> Agronomy, Vasantrao Naik Marathwada Krishi Vidyapeeth, Parbhani 431402<br />
In Marathwada region, out total cultivated area <strong>of</strong> 57.94 lakh ha, 49.60 lakh ha area is<br />
rainfed. The impact <strong>of</strong> climate change and variability in the country on agricultural<br />
production is quite evident in the recent years. The weather aberrations like drought and<br />
floods, extreme events like high intense rainfall, hail storms, heat wave, cold wave etc, are<br />
recurrent in most parts <strong>of</strong> the country during the crop growing periods. The South-West<br />
monsoon account for nearly 75% <strong>of</strong> the precipitation received in the country and exerts a<br />
strong influence on the kharif food grain production and the economy in terms <strong>of</strong> agricultural<br />
output, farmers income and price stability. The onset <strong>of</strong> South west monsoon, the amount <strong>of</strong><br />
rainfall and its distribution are crucial factors which influence the performance <strong>of</strong> agriculture.<br />
The probability <strong>of</strong> erratic monsoon rains is about 40% which implies that 4 out <strong>of</strong> 10 years<br />
there would be an adverse impact on the crop production. There is need to develop<br />
appropriate strategies to deal with such eventualities. Many contingency plans are available at<br />
different scales. However, any contingency intervention either technology related (land,<br />
water, soil, crop) or institutional and policy based, which are implemented on a real time<br />
basis in any crop growing season considered as “Real Time Contingency Plan” is the need <strong>of</strong><br />
hour to stabilize crop stands, production and income in rainfed regions. Marathwada region<br />
comprising <strong>of</strong> eight districts (Aurangabad, Beed, Hingoli, Jalna, Latur, Nanded, Osmanabad<br />
and Parbhani) is traditionally a drought-prone region. The region receives annual rainfall in<br />
the range <strong>of</strong> 500 to 1100 mm and comes under assured rainfall zone (60%), moderately high<br />
rainfall zone (20%) and scarcity zone (20%). The soils in the region are deep black and<br />
medium black. Major kharif crops <strong>of</strong> the region are cotton, soybean, pigeon pea, sorghum,<br />
green gram black gram, and pearl millet, whereas major rabi rainfed crops are rabi sorghum,<br />
safflower and chickpea. Rainfall is the key variable influencing crop productivity in rainfed<br />
farming. Intermittent and prolonged drought are the major cause <strong>of</strong> yield reduction in most <strong>of</strong><br />
the crops. Based on the farmers need, technical interventions were taken up under NICRA<br />
Climate resilient agriculture for risk mitigation<br />
241 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
(National Innovations in Climate Resilient Agriculture) action research project through<br />
preparedness and real time contingency measures.<br />
Methodology<br />
In-situ moisture conservation through conservation furrow in sole soybean and soybean<br />
+ pigeonpea (4:2): Before introduction <strong>of</strong> this project, the farmers were cultivating sole<br />
soybean crop on flat bed without opening <strong>of</strong> conservation furrow. However yield reductions<br />
were observed due to moisture stress during dryspells . Under improved practice, opening <strong>of</strong><br />
conservation furrow after every 4 rows in sole soybean and soybean + pigeon pea (4:2)<br />
intercropping after 30 to 35 days <strong>of</strong> sowing was adopted as a strategy for moisture<br />
conservation on farmers field during 2011-2015.<br />
Soybean + pigeonpea (4:2) intercropping system: Traditionally, farmers were cultivating<br />
soybean crop as sole crop which is very sensitive to moisture stress as well as excess<br />
moisture. The drastic yield reductions were observed due to dryspells. Under such<br />
circumstances soybean + pigeonpea (4:2) intercropping system was introduced and adopted<br />
on farmers field during 2011- 2015.<br />
In-situ moisture conservation through broad bed & furrow (BBF) in soybean:<br />
Performance <strong>of</strong> BBF technique for sowing <strong>of</strong> soybean on farmers field was evaluated during<br />
2014-15 to 2016-17.<br />
Results<br />
Adoption <strong>of</strong> conservation furrow technique: The effect <strong>of</strong> in-situ moisture conservation<br />
practice like conservation furrow in sole soybean on crop productivity (yield), net monetary<br />
returns, BC ratio and RWUE was analyzed.<br />
Effect <strong>of</strong> conservation furrow on crop productivity, NMR, BC ratio and RWUE<br />
Yield<br />
(kg/ha)<br />
Net<br />
returns<br />
(kg/ha)<br />
B:C<br />
ratio<br />
RWUE<br />
(kg/hamm)<br />
242 | Page<br />
Intervention/Year 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Mean<br />
Conservation<br />
furrow in Soybean<br />
1850 2620 1750 668 632 1504<br />
No furrow 1424 2146 1506 446 487 1202<br />
Conservation<br />
furrow in Soybean<br />
21017 30723 41250 10844 3024 22571<br />
No furrow 16177 21546 32710 7240 5374 18609<br />
Conservation<br />
furrow in Soybean<br />
1.52 2.53 3.06 2.02 1.61 2.14<br />
No furrow 1.16 2.07 2.63 1.34 1.42 1.72<br />
Conservation<br />
furrow in Soybean<br />
4.14 5.50 1.78 2.36 2.21 3.19<br />
No furrow 3.19 4.5 1.53 1.58 1.7 2.50<br />
Climate resilient agriculture for risk mitigation
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Results indicated that, with conservation furrow, a sole soybean yield <strong>of</strong> 1504 kg/ha was<br />
obtained with a yield advantage <strong>of</strong> 302 kg/ha over the treatment <strong>of</strong> no conservation furrow<br />
(1202 kg/ha). The net returns <strong>of</strong> Rs. 22571/ha was obtained due to adoption <strong>of</strong> conservation<br />
furrow technique and found to be higher than the net return <strong>of</strong> Rs. 18609 in no furrow<br />
system. The BC ratio under adoption <strong>of</strong> conservation furrow technique was found to be 2.14<br />
as against BC ratio <strong>of</strong> 1.72 with no furrow system. Similarly, the RWUE <strong>of</strong> 3.19 was found<br />
with conservation furrow as compared to RWUE <strong>of</strong> 2.50 in no furrow system. The effect <strong>of</strong><br />
in-situ moisture conservation practice like conservation furrow in sole soybean on crop<br />
productivity (yield), net monetary returns, BC ratio and RWUE was analyzed and the data is<br />
presented.<br />
Effect <strong>of</strong> conservation furrow on crop productivity, NMR, BC ratio and RWUE<br />
Yield<br />
(kg/ha)<br />
Net<br />
returns<br />
(kg/ha)<br />
B:C<br />
ratio<br />
Intervention/Year 2011-<br />
12<br />
Conservation furrow in<br />
Soy + PP (4:2)<br />
2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 Mean<br />
2900 1496 1610 513 1731 1650<br />
No furrow 1875 1160 1205 272 1430 1188<br />
Conservation furrow in<br />
Soy + PP (4:2)<br />
38840 38848 43180 16572 19840 31456<br />
No furrow 18750 26080 27790 8786 16390 19559<br />
Conservation furrow in<br />
Soy + PP (4:2)<br />
3.15 3.16 3.39 2.24 1.62 2.71<br />
RWUE<br />
(kg/hamm)<br />
No furrow 2.04 2.44 2.54 1.18 1.33 1.90<br />
Conservation furrow in<br />
Soy + PP (4:2)<br />
6.50 3.14 1.63 1.81 6.07 3.83<br />
No furrow 4.20 2.43 1.22 0.96 5.01 2.76<br />
In soybean + pigeonpea (4:2) intercropping system, an additional soybean equivalent yield <strong>of</strong><br />
462 kg/ha was obtained with adoption <strong>of</strong> conservation furrow technique as compared to no<br />
furrow with net monetary benefit <strong>of</strong> Rs. 11897/ha. The increase in yield and net return is due<br />
to 30 per cent more moisture conservation resulted in better crop growth and crop<br />
performance even during dry spells.<br />
Climate Resilient Technology: intercropping system: The effect <strong>of</strong> intercropping system<br />
as compared to sole crop under climatic variations over a period <strong>of</strong> years on crop productivity<br />
(yield), net monetary returns, BC ratio and RWUE was analyzed and the data is presented.<br />
Climate resilient agriculture for risk mitigation<br />
243 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Effect <strong>of</strong> intercropping on crop productivity, NMR, BC ratio and RWUE<br />
Year 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 Mean<br />
Yield<br />
(kg/ha)<br />
Net<br />
returns<br />
(kg/ha)<br />
B:C<br />
ratio<br />
RWUE<br />
(kg/hamm)<br />
Soybean +<br />
Pigeonpea(4:2)<br />
Intercropping<br />
system<br />
2464 2859 2443 1340 1731 2167<br />
Sole Soybean 1577 2251 1790 446 527 1318<br />
Soybean +<br />
Pigeonpea(4:2)<br />
Intercropping<br />
system<br />
31715 50623 61132 20164 19840 36695<br />
Sole Soybean 26494 39857 44791 6711 6040 24778<br />
Soybean +<br />
Pigeonpea(4:2)<br />
Intercropping<br />
system<br />
1.98 1.64 3.5 1.59 1.62 2.06<br />
Sole Soybean 1.44 1.29 2.56 0.52 0.49 1.26<br />
Soybean +<br />
Pigeonpea(4:2)<br />
Intercropping<br />
system<br />
5.52 6.0 2.58 4.74 6.07 4.98<br />
Sole Soybean 3.53 4.72 1.89 1.58 1.85 2.71<br />
Soybean + Pigeonpea (4:2) intercropping system recorded significantly higher soybean<br />
equivalent mean yield <strong>of</strong> 2167 kg/ha as against the sole soybean mean yield <strong>of</strong> 1318 kg/ha i.e.<br />
farmers practice over a period <strong>of</strong> five years. The mean net returns in soybean + pigeonpea<br />
intercropping system was recorded as Rs. 36695/ha as against mean sole soybean net return<br />
<strong>of</strong> Rs. 24778/ha in farmers practice. The BC ratio and RWUE was also higher in soybean:<br />
pigeonpea intercropping system as compared to sole soybean crop. During 2014 and 2015,<br />
despite <strong>of</strong> more than 50% deficit rainfall, the intercropping system sustained even in<br />
prolonged dryspell during 2015. The dryspell was occurred at flowering and pod filling stage<br />
<strong>of</strong> soybean and vegetative stage in pigeonpea.<br />
In-situ moisture conservation through broad bed & furrow (BBF) in soybean: The data<br />
on. crop yield, net return, BC ratio and RWUE under BBF technology as compared to<br />
farmers practice is presented.<br />
244 | Page<br />
Climate resilient agriculture for risk mitigation
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Comparison <strong>of</strong> BBF technique with farmers practice for soybean<br />
Soil type Intervention Mean<br />
Seed<br />
yield kg/<br />
ha<br />
Light to<br />
medium<br />
black soil<br />
Stover<br />
yield<br />
/ha<br />
kg<br />
Net returns,<br />
Rs./ha<br />
BC ratio<br />
RWUE,<br />
kg/ha-mm<br />
BBF 1337 1847 19733 1.62 2.166<br />
Farmers<br />
practice<br />
1122 1433 14384 1.46 1.79<br />
Above table indicated that due to use <strong>of</strong> BBF technology, the yield increase was recorded.<br />
Similarly, the net returns, BC ratio and RWUE was found to be higher in BBF technique as<br />
compared to farmers practice. This BBF technique was proved as climate resilient technique<br />
under changing climate.<br />
Well and bore well recharging model: An Experience in NICRA Village A National<br />
Innovations on Climate Resilient Agriculture (NICRA) project in being implemented on<br />
farmers field at village Babhulgaon Tq.Dist.Parbhani. Open well and bore well recharge<br />
technology was demonstrated on 10 and 7 farmers field through participatory mode<br />
respectively. The pre-& post monsoon water levels in the wells were monitored. Also, the<br />
aquifer characteristic viz. transmissivity and specific yield were determined. Accordingly, the<br />
ground water recharge was determined. The Recharge wells recorded higher ground water<br />
potential as compared to un-recharged wells.<br />
Conclusion<br />
Preparedness like adoption <strong>of</strong> climate resilient crops and varieties, adoption <strong>of</strong> in-situ and<br />
ex-situ moisture conservation techniques i.e. Broad bed furrow sowing method, conservation<br />
furrow, farm pond, recharging <strong>of</strong> well and bore wells and intercropping system plays a<br />
crucial role in dryland agriculture for sustaining crop productivity. The Broad Bed and<br />
Furrow sowing technique (BBF) was found to be most efficient climate resilient technology<br />
under variable climatic conditions over a period <strong>of</strong> 5 years with respect to yield enhancement<br />
and thereby the increased net returns. Also, BBF technique resulted in more moisture<br />
conservation as reflected by mean soil moisture status.<br />
References<br />
Ramchandraapa B.K., Thimmegowda, M.N., Satish, A., Jagadeesh, B.N., Devaraja, K.,<br />
Srikanth Babu, P.N., Sativa. M.S. 2016. Real time contingency measures to cope with<br />
rainfall variability in southern Karnataka. Ind. J. Dryland Agric. Res. and Dev. 31(1):<br />
37-43.<br />
Climate resilient agriculture for risk mitigation<br />
245 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
T2a-03O-1238<br />
Climate Resilient Technologies for Sustainable Farm Incomes in Kurnool<br />
District <strong>of</strong> Andhra Pradesh<br />
G. Dhanalakshmi, M. Sudhakar Scientist, E. Ravi Goud and P. Vishnu Mohan Reddy<br />
SHE &CS, Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Yagantipalli. Kurnool dist. A.P-518124<br />
The improved agricultural practices evolved for diverse agro-ecological regions in India have<br />
potential to enhance climate change adaptation. Adaptation is the most prudent tool to face the<br />
losses due to climate change. Resiliency is the ability <strong>of</strong> a system to absorb shocks and recover as<br />
quickly as possible to normal conditions. NICRA is an ICAR initiative launched in 151 climate<br />
vulnerable districts across the country. A number <strong>of</strong> climate resilient technologies were<br />
demonstrated and capacity building <strong>of</strong> farmers was done in the project. The present study made<br />
an attempt to investigate the perception <strong>of</strong> farmers on climate change, their adoption and their<br />
economic returns through adoption <strong>of</strong> the technologies and use <strong>of</strong> Agro Advisory Services using<br />
ex- post facto research design. Kurnool was selected purposively as the locale <strong>of</strong> the study.<br />
Majority <strong>of</strong> the farmers are middle aged with high school education and are small farmers with<br />
good mass media exposure and medium extension contact. Majority <strong>of</strong> the farmers have high<br />
level <strong>of</strong> perception on climate change and its impact on agriculture in terms <strong>of</strong> increase in cost<br />
<strong>of</strong> cultivation, low yields due to dry spells and incidence <strong>of</strong> pest and diseases. Majority <strong>of</strong> the<br />
farmers are adopting climate resilient technologies. Eighty-four per cent <strong>of</strong> the farmers in<br />
Kurnool district are adopting conservation furrows and 92 per cent are adopting drought tolerant<br />
varieties and intercropping <strong>of</strong> red gram and setaria. Calf registration and establishment <strong>of</strong> fodder<br />
banks are highly adopted by the farmers in livestock management.<br />
Independent variables are highly correlated to perception and adoption <strong>of</strong> the climate resilient<br />
technologies. The study also revealed that renovation <strong>of</strong> percolation tank helped in increasing the<br />
cropping intensity. Intercropping <strong>of</strong> setaria and red gram gave additional net returns <strong>of</strong> Rs<br />
15,620/ha. Drought tolerant jowar variety NJ2446, Bengal gram NBeG-3 and medium duration<br />
red gram variety PRG-176 gave additional net returns over farmers’ practice. Calf mortality was<br />
reduced by 66 per cent and use <strong>of</strong> urea molasses and silage feeding to animal proved beneficial.<br />
Most <strong>of</strong> weather based agro advisory services given were pest and disease management followed<br />
by crop production, horticulture and livestock. Majority <strong>of</strong> the farmers felt that the services were<br />
utilized in selection <strong>of</strong> drought tolerant varieties and most <strong>of</strong> them strongly agreed that the<br />
messages were received in right time for control <strong>of</strong> pest and diseases. Fifty-eight per cent strongly<br />
agreed crop management advisories helped to increase their crop yields and fifty three percent<br />
strongly agreed cost <strong>of</strong> supplementary irrigation was reduced followed by total cost <strong>of</strong> cultivation<br />
<strong>of</strong> the crop and most <strong>of</strong> the farmers understood the message received. The study gave insight for<br />
the policy makers to emulate NICRA modules across the country and to redesign the already<br />
existing models with climate change perspective as it became a part <strong>of</strong> Indian farming.<br />
246 | Page<br />
Climate resilient agriculture for risk mitigation
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
T2a-04O-1415<br />
Climate Change Adaptation Models for the Major Farming System<br />
Typologies in Sundarbans<br />
P. K. Garain 1 , C. K. Mondal 1 , F. H. Rahman 2 and A. Saha 1<br />
1<br />
Ramkrishna Ashram KVK, Nimpith, South 24 Parganas, West Bengal – 743338, India;<br />
2 ICAR-Agricultural Technology Application Research Institute, Bhumi Vihar Complex, Block- GB,<br />
Sector- III, Salt Lake, Kolkata-700097, West Bengal, India.<br />
An increased impact <strong>of</strong> climate change on the carbon balance, water cycle, biodiversity,<br />
agricultural productivity and food security is predominant problem globally (Jain et al.,<br />
2013). The effect <strong>of</strong> climate change is being felt worldwide but the low lying coastal agroecosystems<br />
are more vulnerable and likely to experience increasing frequency <strong>of</strong> storm surge<br />
events, floods, coastal erosion and disastrous cyclones, in the coming decades. The Indian<br />
Sundarbans is highly vulnerable to such climatic adversities. There is a gradual decrease in<br />
total rainfall and rainy days and an increase in intensive rain spells (>60 mm per day) as well<br />
as increase in dry spells during monsoon period. Heavy rainfall during Kharif (rainy season<br />
crop) season and delayed monsoon are also common phenomena in this area (Nandargi and<br />
Barman, 2018). Intensive rainfall within short period <strong>of</strong> time leads to prolonged submergence<br />
<strong>of</strong> the ill drained and low-lying crop fields. Long duration and low yielding traditional rice<br />
varieties are the only option. The densely populated low-lying areas create an additional high<br />
risk and vulnerability from the impact <strong>of</strong> such tropical cyclones. There is a steep rise in the<br />
frequency <strong>of</strong> severe cyclonic storms during the last century over the Bay <strong>of</strong> Bengal<br />
(Chakraborty, 2015). During the last three decades the northern part <strong>of</strong> Bay <strong>of</strong> Bengal has<br />
witnessed seven severe cyclones - Sidr, Nargis, Bijli, Aila, Fani, Bulbul and Amphan. All<br />
these climatic vagaries add anguish to the coastal livelihood <strong>of</strong> the 4.5 million people residing<br />
in the area, who primarily depend on forest resources and agriculture for their sustenance.<br />
Hence, migration to the nearby towns, in search <strong>of</strong> alternate livelihood, is very common.<br />
Methodology<br />
A study was conducted to assess climatic vulnerabilities, under “National Innovations on<br />
Climate Resilient Agriculture” (NICRA) by Ramkrishna Ashram Krishi Vigyan Kendra<br />
(RAKVK), in collaboration with Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture (ICAR-<br />
CRIDA), Hyderabad and Agricultural Technology Application Research Institute (ICAR-<br />
ATARI) Kolkata from 2011 to 2021, in the cyclone prone villages <strong>of</strong> Sundarbans (NICRA<br />
News, 2011).<br />
The study was conducted in Bongheri village under the Kultali block <strong>of</strong> the South 24<br />
Parganas district in West Bengal (Latitude: 22 o 2’3” N to 22 o 3’11” N; Longitude: 88 o 37’5” E<br />
to 88 o 38’11” E). to assess different set <strong>of</strong> technological packages on the five existing farming<br />
Climate resilient agriculture for risk mitigation<br />
247 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
system typologies <strong>of</strong> the area (rainfed lowland, rainfed medium land, irrigated lowland,<br />
irrigated medium land and irrigated upland),. Five different packages <strong>of</strong> climate resilient<br />
technologies like mangrove barrier, land shaping, land embankment cultivation, broad bed<br />
cum trench system, flood and salinity tolerant crop varieties, animal health management,<br />
alternate livelihood options (backyard poultry, Asian catfish hatchery, ornamental bird),<br />
community seedbed, custom hiring centre, etc., were demonstrated (Table).. In each typology<br />
the data <strong>of</strong> demonstration plots were compared with the farmers plot following traditional<br />
farming practices from 2019-21.<br />
Results<br />
All interventions under different farming system typologies resulted in significant increase in<br />
net income over the traditional system. The rainfed medium land situation with crop +<br />
livestock farming system showed highest response (409% increase in net income). Even<br />
during cyclonic disturbances (Fani and Bulbul in 2019, Amphan in 2020 and Yaas in 2021)<br />
the village sustained farming activities as the river embankment was intact due to the<br />
mangrove barrier created during the project period.<br />
Lowland situation is most vulnerable to prolonged submergence during cyclones and<br />
intensive rainfall. Community based activities like mangrove restoration and rejuvenation <strong>of</strong><br />
drainage canals were found to be important to provide climate resilience in the project<br />
village. Modification <strong>of</strong> land topography (through land embankment cultivation and broad<br />
bed cum furrow system) in this situation are important to increase crop diversity. Alternate<br />
livelihood support (through catfish hatchery & backyard poultry) also increased the overall<br />
farm income. The medium and upland situation is most vulnerable to dry spells in monsoon<br />
and acute irrigation scarcity during winter and summer. Rainwater harvesting through land<br />
shaping and desiltation <strong>of</strong> existing ponds assured irrigation. Modification <strong>of</strong> land topography<br />
(land shaping) was found to be important to increase cropping intensity. Availability <strong>of</strong> fresh<br />
pond water throughout the year helped to perform fishery and improve the overall net<br />
income. Dependence on mono-cropping increases vulnerability during a climatic hazard.<br />
Diversification in farming through effective integration <strong>of</strong> crop, livestock and fish helped the<br />
farmers to get assured income.<br />
Income from different climate resilient technology packages (average <strong>of</strong> 2019 to 2021)<br />
248 | Page<br />
Climate resilient agriculture for risk mitigation
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Existing Farming<br />
System Typologies<br />
Interventions based on farming system typology<br />
Rainfed<br />
lowland<br />
(crop +<br />
livestock)<br />
Farmers Practice Rice +<br />
greengram +<br />
livestock<br />
Predominant<br />
and<br />
constraints<br />
Climate resilient technology packages demonstrated<br />
climatic<br />
resource<br />
Land<br />
development<br />
Croplivestock-fish<br />
Others<br />
Conclusion<br />
Saline water<br />
intrusion,<br />
submergence,<br />
low crop &<br />
animal<br />
productivity,<br />
excess soil<br />
moisture delays<br />
crop sowing in<br />
Rabi season<br />
Land<br />
embankment<br />
cultivation,<br />
broad bed cum<br />
trench system<br />
SUDHA<br />
method <strong>of</strong><br />
Rice<br />
Paddy cum<br />
fish<br />
Short<br />
duration<br />
greengram<br />
Backyard<br />
poultry<br />
Asian<br />
catfish<br />
hatchery<br />
with<br />
ro<strong>of</strong>top<br />
rainwater<br />
harvesting<br />
Rainfed medium<br />
land<br />
(crop + livestock)<br />
Rice + lathyrus +<br />
livestock<br />
Saline water<br />
intrusion,<br />
submergence, low<br />
productivity <strong>of</strong><br />
crops & animals<br />
Land shaping<br />
Submergence<br />
and salt<br />
tolerant, HYV<br />
Rice +<br />
vegetables<br />
Backyard<br />
poultry<br />
Asian catfish<br />
hatchery with<br />
ro<strong>of</strong>top<br />
rainwater<br />
harvesting<br />
Irrigated<br />
lowland<br />
(crop +<br />
livestock)<br />
Rice +<br />
greengram +<br />
livestock<br />
Saline water<br />
intrusion,<br />
submergence,<br />
low crop &<br />
animal<br />
productivity <strong>of</strong>,<br />
excess soil<br />
moisture delays<br />
crop sowing in<br />
Rabi season<br />
Land<br />
embankment<br />
cultivation<br />
SUDHA<br />
method <strong>of</strong><br />
Rice<br />
Paddy cum<br />
fish<br />
Short<br />
duration<br />
greengram<br />
Sprinkler<br />
irrigation<br />
Backyard<br />
poultry<br />
Asian<br />
catfish<br />
hatchery<br />
Irrigated medium<br />
land<br />
(crop + fish +<br />
livestock)<br />
Rice + vegetable +<br />
fish + livestock<br />
Submergence, soil<br />
salinity in winter<br />
and summer,<br />
ponds silted up,<br />
low fish<br />
productivity, poor<br />
farm<br />
mechanization<br />
Desiltation,<br />
embankment<br />
cultivation<br />
land<br />
Submergence<br />
and salt<br />
tolerant, HYV<br />
Rice +<br />
vegetables<br />
Sprinkler<br />
irrigation<br />
Mixed fish<br />
culture<br />
Green fodder<br />
Irrigated<br />
upland<br />
(crop + fish +<br />
livestock)<br />
Rice +<br />
vegetable + fish<br />
+ livestock<br />
Ponds silted up,<br />
soil salinity in<br />
winter and<br />
summer, lack <strong>of</strong><br />
green fodder,<br />
fish productivity<br />
low, poor farm<br />
mechanization<br />
Desiltation<br />
farm pond<br />
<strong>of</strong><br />
Improved<br />
varieties<br />
INM and<br />
IPM,<br />
mulching,<br />
Sprinkler<br />
irrigation<br />
Mixed fish<br />
culture<br />
Green<br />
fodder<br />
Restoration <strong>of</strong> Mangrove nursery, Rejuvenation <strong>of</strong> drainage canal, Custom hiring centre, Animal<br />
health camp, Community seedbed<br />
Sundarban has a complex farming system typology. Specific packages <strong>of</strong> climate resilient<br />
technologies are required to address the specific problems. Improvement <strong>of</strong> drainage,<br />
rainwater harvesting, stress tolerant varieties and farm based alternate livelihood<br />
opportunities helped to improve climate resilience.<br />
Climate resilient agriculture for risk mitigation<br />
249 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
References<br />
Chakraborty, S. 2015. Investigating the impact <strong>of</strong> severe cyclone Aila and the role <strong>of</strong> disaster<br />
management department—A study <strong>of</strong> Kultali block <strong>of</strong> Sundarban. Am. J. Theo. Appl.<br />
Business. 1(1): 6–13.<br />
Jain, S. K., Kumar, V. and Saharia, M. 2013. Analysis <strong>of</strong> rainfall and temperature trends in<br />
northeast India. Int. J. Clim. 33(4): 968–978.<br />
Nandargi, S. S. and Barman, K. 2018. Evaluation <strong>of</strong> climate change impact on rainfall<br />
variation in West Bengal. Acta Scientifc Agric. 2(7): 74–82.<br />
T2a-05O-1509<br />
Crop Production Interventions for Reducing the Impact <strong>of</strong> Changing<br />
Climate in North East<br />
Bagish Kumar, M. Thoithoi Devi, Abul K. Azad and Rajesh Kumar<br />
ICAR-Agricultural Technology Application Research Institute, Zone-VI, Guwahati, Assam,<br />
India<br />
The human interventions to the nature during the last century has shown its result in the last<br />
couple <strong>of</strong> decades in the form <strong>of</strong> climate change. The aberrant weather scenario is the<br />
showcase <strong>of</strong> climate change. As the agriculture is mainly dependent on the natural weather<br />
phenomenon, so it has been highly affected by the climate change. NICRA is one <strong>of</strong> the<br />
flagship initiative <strong>of</strong> the ICAR to make agriculture more resilient to climate change. It was<br />
also undertaken by the KVKs <strong>of</strong> Assam and Arunachal Pradesh in North east. During 2018-<br />
19, KVK Dibrugarh, Assam introduced submergence tolerant paddy variety Ranjit Sub-1 in<br />
farmers field to replace the normal sali paddy in the highly flood prone area because Ranjit<br />
Sub-1 can endure underwater condition for two weeks without losing their potential yield.<br />
Yield obtained for local check and demonstration were 32.8 q/ha and 41.7 q/ha respectively.<br />
Increase in yield over local check was 27.13%. In Dibrugarh district <strong>of</strong> Assam, after<br />
harvesting <strong>of</strong> winter paddy, area remains fallow from December to June. For enhancing the<br />
production and productivity, short duration early ahu (autumn) paddy variety Dishang was<br />
introduced during March/April-June July. Yield <strong>of</strong> local check and demonstration were 32.8<br />
q/ha and 42.8 q/ha respectively. KVK Dibrugarh, Assam introduced high yielding toria<br />
variety TS – 36 with the aim <strong>of</strong> utilizing rice fallow and producing higher yield. Yield <strong>of</strong><br />
local check and demonstration were 8.0 q/ha and 11.8q/ha respectively. Increase in yield over<br />
local check was 47.50% with B:C ratio <strong>of</strong> 1.65. KVK Dhubri, Assam introduced<br />
submergence tolerant paddy variety Swarna Sub-1 to overcome the flash flood situation in<br />
the district. Yield <strong>of</strong> local check and demonstration were 33.5q/ha and 39.0q/ha respectively.<br />
Increase in yield over local check was 16.42%. KVK Dhubri also introduced submergence<br />
250 | Page<br />
Climate resilient agriculture for risk mitigation
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
tolerance paddy variety Ranjit Sub-1. Ranjit Sub-1 gave a yield <strong>of</strong> 43.5 q/ha as compared to<br />
local check (32.0q/ha). Increase in yield over local check was 35.94%. In Dhubri, due to<br />
water stagnation during kharif, farmers were unable to transplant HYV <strong>of</strong> paddy at<br />
appropriate time with proper seedling age resulting in yield loss. It also revealed that flood<br />
damages kharif paddy during July to August even when transplanting was done in time. To<br />
overcome this situation, staggered planting high yielding paddy variety Gitesh having<br />
flexibility in respect <strong>of</strong> seedling age from 30-60 days was demonstrated in the farmers’ field.<br />
Gitesh gave an average yield <strong>of</strong> 39.8 q/ha as compared to local check resulting in 39.16%<br />
more yield than local check. In Tirap district <strong>of</strong> Arunachal Pradesh, major problem in maize<br />
cultivation was poor early growth and performance <strong>of</strong> maize due to insufficient soil moisture<br />
and quality deterioration <strong>of</strong> cob due to coinciding <strong>of</strong> harvesting time with pre-monsoon<br />
shower. In order to address these problems, sowing time <strong>of</strong> summer maize was advanced It<br />
was observed that advancement in sowing time <strong>of</strong> summer maize resulted in yield <strong>of</strong> 40.7<br />
q/ha as compared to check (29.8 q/ha). Increase in yield over local check was 36.58% with<br />
B:C ratio <strong>of</strong> 2.19.<br />
T2a-05aO-1339<br />
An Integrated Index <strong>of</strong> Climate, Carbon, Yield, and Sustainability for<br />
Identification <strong>of</strong> Resilient Management Options under Cereal-based<br />
Cropping System<br />
N. Subash * , D. Dutta, P.C. Ghasal, Omkar Singh and Brahmdutt<br />
1 Indian Council <strong>of</strong> Agricultural Research-Indian Institute <strong>of</strong> Farming Systems Research (ICAR-<br />
IIFSR), Modipuram, Meerut, Uttar Pradesh, India.<br />
*nsubashpdfsr@gmail.com/n.subash@icar.gov.in<br />
India is considered the "food basket <strong>of</strong> South Asia", particularly its most productive Indo-<br />
Gangetic Plains However, projections indicate that the average climate over India is likely to<br />
be warmer under business-as-usual (between Representation Concentration Pathway (RCP)<br />
6.0 and RCP 8.5) by 1.7 to 2.0 O C for 2030 and by 3.3–4.8 O C for the 2080 compared to the<br />
pre-industrial times. Precipitation is expected to increase by 5–6% in the 2030 and by 6–14%<br />
in the 2080. Changes in temperature and rainfall patterns can have a great impact on the<br />
organic matter and processes that take place in our soils. A farm level study found that rice<br />
yields will decline by 8–23% in the 2050 under RCP 8.5, whereas wheat yields will also<br />
decline by 6–29% under the current agricultural production system. Much <strong>of</strong> this variation is<br />
due to the variability <strong>of</strong> farm-level management practices. Under tropical conditions,<br />
continuous cropping without the addition <strong>of</strong> organic matter may further reduce soil health and<br />
crop productivity. In locations with high initial soil organic carbon (SOC), depletion <strong>of</strong> SOC<br />
was noticed due to continuous cropping, whereas SOC increased significantly at locations<br />
Climate resilient agriculture for risk mitigation<br />
251 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
with low initial SOC in the rice-wheat cropping system. Cereal-based cropping system, an<br />
integral part <strong>of</strong> the agricultural food system <strong>of</strong> India depends on site-specific integrated<br />
nutrient management (INM) practices. Resilience is closely linked to low yield variability<br />
due to climate aberrations, higher soil carbon buildup, higher yield and sustainability. The<br />
predominant cereal-based cropping systems in South Asia are rice-rice, rice-wheat,<br />
pearlmillet-wheat, sorghum-wheat, rice-maize, maize-wheat and rice-mustard. In this study,<br />
we analyzed the response <strong>of</strong> long-term application <strong>of</strong> INM on yield sustainability <strong>of</strong><br />
important cropping systems through the quantification <strong>of</strong> climate change parameters and<br />
changes in SOC with respect to cropping systems and climate variability and change.<br />
Finally, we developed a composite resilient index (CRI) as a function <strong>of</strong> yield sustainability,<br />
climate variability, SOC changes and opportunity for yield enhancement.<br />
Methodology<br />
Long-term experimental data from 28 sites representing different agro-ecological zones <strong>of</strong><br />
India, recorded under AICRP-IFS data under different integrated management treatments<br />
were used to investigate for predominant cereal-based cropping systems viz., rice-rice, ricewheat,<br />
pearlmillet-wheat, sorghum-wheat, rice-maize, maize-wheat and rice-mustard during<br />
the period 1980-2015. In this study, all four factors, yield advantages, sustainability, climate<br />
variability, and soil fertility considered to develop the integrated index. Equal weightage was<br />
given to sustainability, climate, organic carbon, yield and based on the order <strong>of</strong> value <strong>of</strong> CRI,<br />
primary, secondary, and tertiary site-specific resilient integrated nutrient management<br />
practices were identified for all the sites with respect to different cereal based cropping<br />
systems.<br />
Results<br />
All the indices, viz., Sustainability yield index, coefficient <strong>of</strong> variation index, soil organic<br />
carbon index, and yield gap index were worked out separately for all the treatments, and the<br />
best treatments were identified based on the highest value <strong>of</strong> index in each category. As per<br />
the formula, with equal weightage <strong>of</strong> 0.25 assigned to each index and estimating the<br />
composite resilient index (CRI) based on the highest value, the respective management<br />
practices identified. This will be a "mid-way" path <strong>of</strong> management practices, which is smart<br />
and resilient with respect to sustainability, higher yield, less climate variability, and good for<br />
soil carbon. Three options for different stakeholders, based on the highest three composite<br />
resilient indices; primary, secondary, and tertiary management options, will provide different<br />
stakeholders with options based on local availability <strong>of</strong> resources. 50% substitution <strong>of</strong><br />
nitrogen through green manure along with remaining recommended dose <strong>of</strong> fertilizer is the<br />
best management option to address sustainability-yield gap- low climatic variability and for<br />
high soil organic carbon buildup under rice-rice system in Rajendranagar. Similarly,<br />
identified site specific management option for other cropping systems also. The assessment<br />
252 | Page<br />
Climate resilient agriculture for risk mitigation
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
framework for the CRI is unique because it addresses the climate-carbon-yield-sustainability<br />
nexus under different cropping systems and different management practices options. Crop<br />
production is the function <strong>of</strong> weather conditions, soil, inputs, crop area, government<br />
incentives. Technological inputs have been growing steadily and are difficult to quantify, but<br />
the strict protocols <strong>of</strong> multi-specialized scientific <strong>of</strong>ficials involved in data recording and<br />
experimentation. The identified primary, secondary and tertiary site-specific resilient<br />
management practices under different cropping systems provide options to stakeholders,<br />
especially farmers and policy makers. CRI provides researchers, particularly plant breeders,<br />
with the opportunity to develop improved varieties; agronomists with the opportunity to<br />
develop/identify better management options; and plant physiologists with the opportunity to<br />
change crop geometry in future thinking and research to accommodate more partitioning to<br />
yield. As far as the farmer’s field is concerned, the resiliency is entirely different because, in<br />
addition to these four factors, several other socio-economic and location-specific<br />
characteristics prevail. The yield gap with respect to site-specific INM options versus district<br />
yield indicates that with site-specific intervention <strong>of</strong> already available management options,<br />
food security can be sustained and also address the local level impact <strong>of</strong> climate variability<br />
effects due to global climate change. There is a need to assess the same methodological<br />
framework <strong>of</strong> the composite resilient index concept at farmers' fields with intensive and<br />
accurate data collection <strong>of</strong> soil and management practices followed under different cropping<br />
systems, especially pertaining to the first, second, and third predominant cropping systems.<br />
T2a-06R-1010<br />
Evaluation <strong>of</strong> Yield Performance in High Yielding Finger Millet Varieties<br />
in NICRA Villages <strong>of</strong> Ganjam<br />
S. Mangaraj 1 , P. K. Panda 1 , S. K. Satapathy 1 , P. J. Mishra 1 , F. H. Rahman 2 and<br />
A. Mishra 1<br />
1 Odisha University <strong>of</strong> Agriculture & Technology, Bhubaneswar, Odisha-751003, India;<br />
2 ICAR- Agricultural Technology Application Research Institute Kolkata, Bhumi Vihar Complex, Salt<br />
Lake, Kolkata–700097, India.<br />
Finger millet, well known as ragi (Eleusine coracana L.) is a non-glutenaceous nutri-cereal<br />
placed third in the country with respect to area and production and has noteworthiness in<br />
having the highest productivity among major and minor millets after sorghum and bajra.<br />
Finger millet is a nutritionally rich millet having 5-8% protein, 1.3% fat, 344 mg calcium, 70-<br />
76% slow releasing carbohydrate, 15-35 % dietary fibre, 2.86% lysine and 1.5-3.5% mineral<br />
which is being promoted as safe food for different co-morbid patients (Sebastin et al., 2005).<br />
Millets are grown in harsh environments and the performance <strong>of</strong> the variety is linked to its<br />
ability to adjust to fluctuating edaphic and climatic situations. Generally, farmers cultivate<br />
Climate resilient agriculture for risk mitigation<br />
253 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
finger millet by using locally available varieties and save their seeds for next season too. Due<br />
to uninterrupted cultivation <strong>of</strong> the same and local varieties, farmers suffer from the reduction<br />
in yield. Actually, the crop is always grown in marginal land and in rainfed ecosystem <strong>of</strong> the<br />
state. In Southern Odisha, harsh and adverse climatic conditions coupled with marginal soils<br />
make agricultural production system unfavourable due to high risk <strong>of</strong> unpredictability during<br />
kharif season. One possible solution is to identify and increase the yield <strong>of</strong> finger millet that<br />
is highly adaptive to local climate, have high nutrient value and can efficiently withstand<br />
biotic and/or abiotic stresses. However, the new high yielding varieties should not be directly<br />
dissipated to the farming communities for large scale production before they are assessed for<br />
their performance. Standardisation <strong>of</strong> suitable varieties for a particular area is <strong>of</strong> prime<br />
importance to perceive the yield potential <strong>of</strong> finger millet. Their potential for enhanced<br />
nutritive value and climate resilient agriculture are also understudied.<br />
Ganjam district in the state <strong>of</strong> Odisha in India is delineated by a year-round equable<br />
temperature and high humidity, coastal area in particular. Normally, annual rainfall <strong>of</strong> the<br />
district is 1302 mm. About 80% <strong>of</strong> annual rainfall is received during S-W monsoon. On an<br />
average; there are 65 rainy days a year in district. The prevailing soil texture in the area is<br />
mostly sandy loam. Agricultural activity is primarily rainfed, and kharif (June–September) is<br />
the primary cropping season. The poor and marginal famers usually grow local landraces <strong>of</strong><br />
finger millet, viz. budha mandia, nali mandia, and tholi mandia, using traditional agronomic<br />
practices. Finger millet is mostly cultivated in kharif on marginal lands in the upland with<br />
few or no external inputs, either as a pure crop or with a range <strong>of</strong> pulses, legumes and<br />
oilseeds under mixed cropping systems. Further, due to traditional cultivation practices, the<br />
grain yield is as low as 5-7 q/ha under broadcasting method, and even with traditional<br />
transplanting methods yield, it is only 7-9 q/ha. So there is an immediate requirement for<br />
enhancing the productivity <strong>of</strong> finger millet as well as to reach the potential <strong>of</strong> high yielding<br />
varieties. Keeping this point in view, an on-farm testing <strong>of</strong> high yielding finger millet<br />
varieties was taken up by Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Ganjam-I to assess the production potential<br />
<strong>of</strong> HYVs <strong>of</strong> finger millet in NICRA villages through NICRA project.<br />
Methodology<br />
The study was carried out through on farm testing in kharif-2019 at NICRA villages i.e. Nada<br />
(19.9202˚ N, 84.7517˚ E), Chikili (19.5564˚ N, 85.0052˚ E), and Chopara (19.9522˚ N,<br />
84.7592˚ E) <strong>of</strong> Ganjam district under <strong>of</strong> Odisha with an objective to evaluate suitable ragi<br />
varieties in Ganjam. The site <strong>of</strong> experiment was sandy loam in texture, slightly acidic in<br />
reaction (pH 6.12), Low in organic carbon (0.48 %), low in available nitrogen (202.6 kg/ha),<br />
medium in available phosphorus (18.6 kg/ha) and high in available potassium (289.2 kg/ha).<br />
The soil has good drainage capacity. The experiment was laid out in kharif season (June to<br />
October) <strong>of</strong> 2021 in a randomized block design (RBD) with four treatments (T1: Farmers’<br />
254 | Page<br />
Climate resilient agriculture for risk mitigation
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
practice with traditional farming practices, T2: Bhairabi with improved package <strong>of</strong> practices,<br />
T3: Arjuna with improved package <strong>of</strong> practices and T4: Kalua with improved package <strong>of</strong><br />
practices) and ten replications taking each farmer as a separate entity. The allocated land area<br />
to each farmer was equally split into four treatments to fit all the varieties. Finger millet<br />
nursery was done with seed rate <strong>of</strong> 10 kg/ha. Transplanting <strong>of</strong> 21 days old seedlings with<br />
spacing <strong>of</strong> 20 cm × 10 cm was done. Application <strong>of</strong> 100% RDF (40:20:20 kg N-P 2O 5-<br />
K2O/ha) and timely weeding and need-based plant protection measures were carried out.<br />
Basal application <strong>of</strong> half <strong>of</strong> nitrogen, total phosphorus and potash were applied over the main<br />
field just before transplanting. Remaining half <strong>of</strong> nitrogen was applied 21 DAT depending on<br />
soil moisture availability.<br />
Results<br />
Perusal data from the figure 1 revealed that Cultivation <strong>of</strong> Arjuna with improved package <strong>of</strong><br />
practices resulted in significantly higher number <strong>of</strong> fingers/panicle (10.2) and grain yield<br />
(18.27 q/ha) than farmers’ practice <strong>of</strong> growing local varieties (4.8 and 10.04 q/ha,<br />
respectively). This is closely followed by cultivation <strong>of</strong> Kalua (7.8 and 16.02 q/ha,<br />
respectively) and Bhairabi (6.2 and13.22 q/ha, respectively).<br />
Conclusion<br />
Grain yield <strong>of</strong> high yielding ragi varieties<br />
(T1: Farmers’ practice T2: Bhairabi T3: Arjuna T4:Kalua)<br />
From the field experiment, it was concluded that Cultivation <strong>of</strong> Arjuna with improved<br />
package <strong>of</strong> practices performs better than cultivation <strong>of</strong> farmers’ local varieties in Ganjam<br />
district <strong>of</strong> Odisha. Thus, existing varieties <strong>of</strong> local ragi varieties may be replaced with high<br />
yielding Arjuna variety due to its superior agronomic performance.<br />
Climate resilient agriculture for risk mitigation<br />
255 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Reference<br />
Sebastin, L., Gowri, S. and Prakash, J. 2005. Quality characteristics <strong>of</strong> finger millet –<br />
incorporated Chakli – An Indian Deep-fried product. J. Food Proc. Preserv. 29(5-6):<br />
319-330.<br />
T2a-07R-1054<br />
Real-time Contingency Planning and Preparedness to Cope with Weather<br />
Aberrations in Agriculture: Experiences from NICRA<br />
S.B. Patil 1* , M.S. Shirahatti 1 , R.A. Nandagavi 1 , B.H. Kumara 1 , U.M. Momin 1 ,<br />
H.S. Patil 1 and G. Ravindrachary 2<br />
1 AICRP for Dryland Agriculture, Regional Agricultural Research Station, Vijayapura 586 101,<br />
University <strong>of</strong> Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad, Karnataka; 2 AICRP for Dryland Agriculture, ICAR-<br />
CRIDA, Hyderabad 500059, Telangana<br />
*patilsb13617@uasd.in<br />
Weather aberrations make rainfed agriculture highly vulnerable, risk-prone and <strong>of</strong>ten<br />
unpr<strong>of</strong>itable, impacting the livelihoods <strong>of</strong> smallholders. A range <strong>of</strong> dryland technologies are<br />
needed to deal droughts before they occur or when they are in progress. Several national<br />
initiatives were launched in India for climate change research, and significant among them is<br />
National Initiative on Climate Resilient Agriculture (NICRA) by the ICAR. Strategic and<br />
anticipated research to understand the significant role <strong>of</strong> climate variability on rainfed<br />
agriculture is being pursued at a greater depth. There is an immediate need to demonstrate<br />
appropriate contingent measures to make rainfed agriculture resilient, economically viable<br />
and environmentally sustainable. The real-time contingency interventions included crops,<br />
varieties, rainwater conservation, efficient utilization, and various crop management<br />
practices. Any contingency measure, either technology-related (land, soil, water, crop) or<br />
institutional and policy-based, which is implemented based on real-time weather patterns<br />
(including extreme events) in any crop growing season, is considered as Real Time<br />
Contingency Planning (RTCP). Timely and effective RTCP implementation during the<br />
delayed onset <strong>of</strong> monsoon, seasonal droughts and floods resulted in better crop performance,<br />
higher agricultural production, better incomes and overall stability in household livelihoods<br />
(Srinivasa Rao et al., 2013). The RTCP at Vijayapura center was implemented with twopronged<br />
approaches, i.e., preparedness and real-time contingency measures. The experiences<br />
<strong>of</strong> AICRPDA-Vijayapura on the RTCP implemented in NICRA villages are highlighted.<br />
Methodology<br />
Vijayapura is in the Karnataka plateau (AESR3), and the climate is hot arid. The average<br />
annual rainfall is 594 mm, with a potential evaporation <strong>of</strong> 622 mm. The length <strong>of</strong> the growing<br />
256 | Page<br />
Climate resilient agriculture for risk mitigation
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
period is 90-120 days. Drought is common and occurs once in five years. The soils are<br />
shallow to deep loamy and clayey, mixed red and black soils. The dominant rainfed crops<br />
during kharif are pigeonpea and green gram, rabi crops are sorghum and chickpea. The<br />
NICRA sites are located at the Kavalagi and Honnutagi villages <strong>of</strong> Vijayapura district. The<br />
interventions on various dryland technologies have been implemented in the NICRA village<br />
from 2011-12. Since the project's inception at the AICRPDA-Vijayapura center, different<br />
weather aberrations like the delayed onset <strong>of</strong> monsoon, mid-season drought, terminal drought<br />
and extreme events like untimely excess rainfall events were experienced in NICRA villages.<br />
To overcome these situations and reduce crop losses, various RTCPs and preparedness were<br />
implemented, including crops and varieties change, soil, rainwater conservation and<br />
utilization, and different agronomic practices were demonstrated in a contiguous area in the<br />
village. In selecting the beneficiaries, the farmers most vulnerable to climatic variability, and<br />
the smallholders were given priority. It was also ensured that each demonstration had a<br />
control plot for all the implemented interventions to assess the impact <strong>of</strong> interventions in a<br />
short period. The details <strong>of</strong> RTCP implemented during various weather aberrations are<br />
presented in Table.<br />
RTCP for various weather aberrations implemented in NICRA villages<br />
Weather aberrations<br />
Delayed onset <strong>of</strong><br />
monsoon<br />
Early season drought<br />
Mid-season drought<br />
Terminal drought<br />
Interventions<br />
Change <strong>of</strong> crop/variety depends on the farming situation, soil, rainfall and<br />
cropping pattern<br />
Resowing, thinning, removal <strong>of</strong> alternate row, weeding, inter cultivation<br />
and opening <strong>of</strong> conservation furrow<br />
Repeated inter cultivation, KNO 3 @ 0.5% spray, supplemental irrigation<br />
Harvest pearl millet for fodder, protective irrigation, prepare for rabi crops<br />
Results<br />
The real-time contingency measures were implemented in the selected villages to cope with<br />
various weather aberrations and enhance yield at the field level. NICRA villages have<br />
experienced the delayed onset <strong>of</strong> monsoon some years since its inception. Under this<br />
situation, we implemented the RTCPs, like changing crops and varieties. In 2021-22, the<br />
onset <strong>of</strong> the monsoon was normal. The improved varieties <strong>of</strong> green gram (BGS-9 and<br />
DGGV-7) and pigeonpea variety (TS-3R) were introduced in farmers' fields, replacing local<br />
varieties. The improved pigeonpea variety TS-3R recorded 24.99% increase, and green gram<br />
varieties DGGV-7 and BGS-9 noticed an increase <strong>of</strong> 31.73 and 24.19%, respectively, higher<br />
yield than the local variety and also recorded maximum RWUE, net returns, and B:C ratio. In<br />
an early-season drought situation, interventions like thinning, weeding, inter cultivation, and<br />
opening <strong>of</strong> conservation furrows were implemented in the various crops. There was an<br />
average yield increase <strong>of</strong> 16.20% in pigeonpea, 19.97% in green gram, 15.31% in chickpea,<br />
Climate resilient agriculture for risk mitigation<br />
257 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
28.48% in rabi sorghum and 12.86% in safflower due to inter cultivation during the 2021-22<br />
cropping season. As a mid-season correction to mitigate dry spells, the interventions like<br />
repeated inter cultivation, supplemental irrigation and foliar spray were implemented. Foliar<br />
application <strong>of</strong> KNO3 @ 0.5% observed higher yields with an increase <strong>of</strong> 20-26% in various<br />
crops than in no sprays. In a terminal drought situation, protective irrigation from a farm<br />
pond or other irrigation source saves crop life and stabilizes yield. The impact <strong>of</strong> RTCP on<br />
coping with aberrant weather situations was also studied in various AICRPDA centres<br />
(Srinivasa Rao et al., 2013).<br />
Effective drought preparedness and management is a planning and response process to<br />
predict drought and establish timely and appropriate responses to minimize the negative<br />
consequences <strong>of</strong> the drought. We demonstrated simple and easily implementable<br />
preparedness practices like in situ rainwater harvesting practices, climate resilient<br />
intercropping systems, integrated farming systems, energy management and other agronomic<br />
practices in NICRA village to cope with weather aberration and enhance yields. The villagelevel<br />
institutions like Village Climate Risk Management Committee (VCRMC) and the<br />
custom hiring center (CHC) established in NICRA village can contribute immensely to<br />
community participation in the successful implementation <strong>of</strong> NICRA activities.<br />
Conclusion<br />
Technology development in agriculture address weather aberrations, which will make<br />
agriculture more climate resilient. The different RTCPs and preparedness implemented under<br />
NICRA observed better crop yield and pr<strong>of</strong>itability under various weather aberrations.<br />
References<br />
Srinivasarao, Ch., Ravindra Chary, G., Mishra, P.K., Nagarjuna Kumar, R., Maruthi Sankar,<br />
G.R., Venkateswarlu, B., and Sikka, A.K., 2013. Real time contingency planning:<br />
Initial experiences from AICRPDA. All India Coordinated Research Project for<br />
Dryland Agriculture (AICRPDA), ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad, India. 63 p.<br />
T2a-08R-1222<br />
Performance <strong>of</strong> Pigeon pea based Intercropping Systems under Changing<br />
Climatic Conditions<br />
M. Sudhakar, G. Dhanalakshmi, K.V. Ramanaiah, E. Ravi Goud<br />
SHE &CS, Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Yagantipalli. Kurnool dist. A.P-518124<br />
Adverse weather conditions like delay onset <strong>of</strong> rains and prolonged dry spells during the crop<br />
period is very common in rainfed situation. Such situation results in economic losses to the<br />
farmers due to partial or total failure <strong>of</strong> the sole crops. Pigeon pea is being cultivated in an area<br />
258 | Page<br />
Climate resilient agriculture for risk mitigation
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
<strong>of</strong> 45,000 ha and yields are limited by the amount and distribution <strong>of</strong> rainfall during monsoon<br />
period. Pigeon pea is a late maturing, tall growing, wide spaced crop with deep root system can<br />
accommodate rapidly growing, short duration and short statured crops like millets and pulses.<br />
To develop climate resilient alternative crop management systems and to reduce the impact <strong>of</strong><br />
crop failure due to drought. During the years 2016-2018 eighteen pigeon pea based<br />
intercropping systems were assessed under rainfed situation ie pigeon pea + greengram (1:5),<br />
pigeon pea + blackgram(1:5),T3: pigeonpea + setaria(1:5 ) and T4: Pigeonpea Sole).<br />
The results indicated that, among the cropping systems, intercropping <strong>of</strong> pigeonpea +<br />
greengram (1:5) (1263 kg ha-1), pigeon pea + setaria(1:5) 1244kg/ha and blackgram with<br />
pigeon pea (1198 kg ha-1) resulted in maximum pigeon pea equivalent yield over sole crop <strong>of</strong><br />
pigeon pea (986 kg /ha). The LER is high in pigeon pea + setaria intercropping system (1.67)<br />
as compared to other inter cropping systems. Among all intercropping Systems pigeon pea +<br />
setaria recorded highest net returns (26826 Rs/ha) followed by pigeon pea + greengram<br />
(24360Rs/ha) compared to pigeonpea + blackgram and sole pigeonpea. From the results it is<br />
evident that intercropping in rainfed areas stabilises the productivity and enhance the returns in<br />
terms <strong>of</strong> increased net returns and benefit cost ratio as well. Intercropping also act as insurance<br />
under the conditions <strong>of</strong> crop failures due to pest incidence, weeds and changing monsoon<br />
conditions.<br />
Climate resilient agriculture for risk mitigation<br />
T2a-09R-1224<br />
Does Rise in Atmospheric Temperature and Carbon Dioxide Adversely<br />
affect Maize Growth in Acid Soils <strong>of</strong> Northeast India?<br />
Ramesh Thangavel*, B.U. Choudhury, A. Balusamy, M. Prabha Devi, Joymati Chanu,<br />
M. Chakraborty, S. Hazarika and V.K. Mishra<br />
Division <strong>of</strong> System Research and Engineering, ICAR Research Complex for NEH Region, Umiam,<br />
Meghalaya-793103<br />
*rameshssac@yahoo.co.in<br />
Climate change was a myth or speculation in earlier times. However, now world has<br />
recognised that climate change is a fact. Today, the atmospheric concentration <strong>of</strong> CO 2 has<br />
risen to more than 400 ppm, warming the atmosphere by 0.84 o C (Vanaja et al., 2015). Global<br />
warming will have an impact on crop productivity. Plant development will be aided by<br />
increased photosynthesis and fertilisation effects brought on by elevated atmospheric CO 2<br />
(Kim et al., 2007). Increased temperature will result in physiological problems and heat<br />
injury, which will lower yield (IPCC, 2014). Depending on the regions, increased warmth<br />
brought on by increased CO 2 will have a significant impact on the production <strong>of</strong> food grains.<br />
Food grain production is expected to decline by up to 30% in tropical and subtropical nations<br />
like India as temperatures rise by 1.0 to 2.0 o C (IPCC, 2014). Therefore, adaptation strategies<br />
to sustain the crop productivity in the region is in urgent need. However, limited state <strong>of</strong> the<br />
259 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
art facilities for climatic research is one <strong>of</strong> the major constraints to predict whether rise in<br />
temperature along with CO2 have positive or negative effect on crop yield <strong>of</strong> the region. This<br />
study involves one <strong>of</strong> the foremost state-<strong>of</strong>-the-art facilities like Free Air Temperature<br />
Enrichment (FATE) to test the positive or negative impact <strong>of</strong> elevated temperature and CO2<br />
on the second most important crop <strong>of</strong> the region i.e. maize after the rice. Similarly, what are<br />
the possible adaptation strategies, if crop performance is affected, to compensate the crop<br />
yield loss due to climate change. Therefore, we conducted this study under the state-<strong>of</strong>-the-art<br />
facility (FATE) under open field condition with an anticipation like other parts, the crop<br />
productivity may be adversely affected.<br />
Methodology<br />
An experiment using FATE chambers was conducted at the NICRA Research farm <strong>of</strong> ICAR<br />
Research Complex for NEH Region, Umiam, Meghalaya. The mean annual rainfall is about<br />
2208 mm with minimum temperature <strong>of</strong> 6.8 o C and maximum <strong>of</strong> 29.7 o C. The main<br />
treatments are (i) ambient CO 2 (ACO 2) and ambient temperature (AT) (ii) Ambient CO 2 +<br />
elevated temperature (ET) and (iii) Elevated CO2 (ECO2) +ET. The three adaptation<br />
strategies namely a) 100% organic (FYM) (T2), b) 100% inorganic fertilizers (T3) and c)<br />
integrated nutrient management practices (INM) (T4) were compared with the absolute<br />
control (T1). FYM was applied at the rate equivalent to nitrogen content in FYM and P was<br />
supplemented through rock phosphate in T2 and T4, accordingly. We selected maize (RCM<br />
1-61) as the test crop and conducted the experiment for two consecutive years (2021-22)<br />
during kharif season. The initial properties <strong>of</strong> the soil samples were analysed using the<br />
standard procedures. At the end <strong>of</strong> the harvest, plant parameters including yield were<br />
recorded as per the standard procedures. Harvest Index (HI) was calculated using the formula<br />
outlined by Kemanian et al. (2007).<br />
Results<br />
The plant height was significantly influenced by the ECO2 and ET. The plant height ranged<br />
from 290.5 cm (T 1) to 309.7 cm (T 3) in ACO 2+AT; 245.5 cm (T 1) to 257.2 cm (T 3) in<br />
ACO 2+ET and 275.8 cm (T 1) to 311.9 (T 3) under both ECO2+ET treatments. ET decreased<br />
the plant height by 19.3% over ACO2+AT however, addition <strong>of</strong> ECO2 along with ET<br />
nullified the negative impact <strong>of</strong> ET on plant height which is at par with ACO 2+AT (296.6<br />
cm). Irrespective <strong>of</strong> the nutrient management treatments, the biomass yield ranged from 8.37<br />
(T1) to 9.49 (T4) t ha -1 in ACO2+AT; 6.63 (T1) to 8.06 (T2) t ha -1 under ACO2+ET and 8.18<br />
(T 1) to 9.55 (T 4) t ha -1 under both ECO 2+ET treatments (Fig. 1a). Similarly, the maize grain<br />
yield ranged from 3.97 (T1) to 4.58 (T4) t ha -1 in ACO2+AT; 2.67 (T1) to 3.23 (T4) t ha -1<br />
under ACO 2+ET and 2.93 to 4.06 (T3) t ha -1 under both ECO 2+ET treatments (Fig. 1b).<br />
Overall, the biomass and maize grain yield were in the range between 6.63 to 9.55 t ha -1 and<br />
2.67 to 4.58 t ha -1 , respectively. ET caused 44% reduction in grain yield over ACO2+AT<br />
260 | Page<br />
Climate resilient agriculture for risk mitigation
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
(4.39 t ha -1 ) however, inclusion <strong>of</strong> ECO2 with ET showed only 26.6% reduction in the grain<br />
yield over ACO2+AT. On the other hand, 18% reduction in biomass yield was observed<br />
under ET alone. With the addition <strong>of</strong> ECO 2 with ET, 22% increase in biomass yield was<br />
recorded over ET alone i.e. about 4% higher over ACO2+AT. The harvest index (HI) ranged<br />
from 35.8 to 52.9%. Both ET alone and ECO 2+ET showed 20 and 32%, respectively<br />
reduction in HI over ACO 2+AT treatment. With respect to nutrient management practices, i.e.<br />
adaptation strategies, INM (T4) recorded the maximum grain yield (4.58 t ha -1 ), biomass yield<br />
(9.55 t ha -1 ) while 100% organic fertilizers (T 2) recorded the highest HI (52.9%) regardless <strong>of</strong><br />
the ECO 2 and ET treatments. On an average, the adaptation strategy, INM, increased the<br />
biomass yield by about 17%, 4.5% and 10% compared to absolute control (T1), 100% organic<br />
(T 2) and 100% inorganic fertilizers (T 3), respectively. On the other hand, 100% inorganic<br />
fertilizers (T3) showed 4.5%, 7.5% and 23% increase in grain yield over T4, T2 and T1,<br />
respectively. Adaption INM and 100% organic nutrient management practices recovered the<br />
grain yield from 8 to 12% and biomass yield from 16 to 19% higher over the yield loss<br />
caused by elevated temperature.<br />
Effect <strong>of</strong> elevated CO2 and temperature on maize biomass yield (a) and grain yield (b) in acid soils <strong>of</strong><br />
Meghalaya<br />
Conclusion<br />
The study showed that maize responded positively to elevated CO2 with respect to plant<br />
growth parameters. On the other hand, elevated temperature decreased the biomass and grain<br />
yield components <strong>of</strong> maize. ET alone decreased the HI significantly however; addition <strong>of</strong><br />
CO2 with ET further decreased the HI significantly. The integrated nutrient management and<br />
FYM application could be better adaptation strategies for significant recovery <strong>of</strong> the yield<br />
loss caused by the elevated temperature. Further, these adaptation strategies could also<br />
improve the soil fertility under the changing climatic scenario.<br />
Climate resilient agriculture for risk mitigation<br />
261 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
References<br />
IPCC. 2014. Climate change 2014: impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Contribution <strong>of</strong> Working<br />
Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report <strong>of</strong> the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.<br />
Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA p. 1150.<br />
Kemanian, A.R., Stöckle, C.O., Huggins, D.R. and Viega, L.M. 2007. A simple method to estimate<br />
harvest index in grain crops. Field Crops Res. 103(3): 208-16.<br />
Kim SH, Gitz DC, Sicher RC, Baker JT and Timlin DJ. 2007. Temperature dependence <strong>of</strong> growth<br />
development, and photosynthesis in maize under elevated CO 2. Env. Exp. Bot. 61: 224–236.<br />
Vanaja M, Maheswari M, Jyothi Lakshmi N. et al. 2015. Variability in growth and yield response <strong>of</strong><br />
maize genotypes at elevated CO 2 concentration. Adv. Pl. Agric. Res. 2: 42.<br />
T2a-10R-1247<br />
Environment-Friendly Utilization <strong>of</strong> Basic Slag and Methanotroph to<br />
Mitigate Methane Emission in Lowland Rice<br />
S. Swain 1,2 *, P. Bhattacharyya 1 , P. Parida 2 , S. R. Padhy 1 , S. P. Parida 1 , S. K. Nayak 1<br />
and A. Das 1<br />
1 Crop Production Division, ICAR-National Rice Research Institute, Cuttack, Odisha-753006, India.<br />
2 Maharaja Sriram Chandra Bhanja Deo University, Baripada, Odisha-757001, India.<br />
* saubhagyalaxmi36@gmail.com<br />
Basic slag is an alkaline waste product produced during the smelting <strong>of</strong> metal ore in the<br />
production <strong>of</strong> iron and steel and has a high concentration <strong>of</strong> electron acceptors like free<br />
oxides. Global steel production was169.2 million tons in March 2021 (World Steel<br />
Association, 2021). India was in second largest steel producer (10 million tons) after China<br />
(94.00 million tons) during 2021. So, the vast amounts <strong>of</strong> slags including basic slags have<br />
been also generated that need to be utilized properly (Singh and Rekha, 2020). Reducing,<br />
recycling, and reusing <strong>of</strong> waste is necessary for economic and environmental sustainability<br />
(Singh et al., 2013). Basic slag contains a variety <strong>of</strong> useful components; viz. calcium oxide<br />
(CaO), magnesium oxide (MgO), silicon dioxide (SiO 2 ), alumina (Al 2 O 3 ), ferrous oxide<br />
(FeO), iron oxide (Fe 2 O 3), manganese dioxide (MnO 2 ), free calcium oxide (f-CaO), and<br />
free magnesium oxide (f-MgO) (Liu et al., 2019). It can be used as mineral fertilizer (Pang<br />
and Yang, 2020) including phosphate and silicon fertilizer. Apart from that it could also be<br />
used as soil a 0mendment for reducing GHGs emission from agricultural soils (Singla et al.,<br />
2015; Gwon et al., 2018; Wang et al., 2018a; Das et al., 2019). The rate <strong>of</strong> application <strong>of</strong><br />
basic slag in soils is also important for regulating methane emission. Iron-free oxides present<br />
in slag play a major role in the mitigation <strong>of</strong> CH4 emissions from paddy soil (Wang et al.,<br />
2015).<br />
262 | Page<br />
Climate resilient agriculture for risk mitigation
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Further, in paddy fields, soil microbial activities are the main factors controlling the<br />
production and uptake <strong>of</strong> CH4 (Conrad 1996). Methanotrophs are aerobic to microaerophilic<br />
bacteria, that metabolize and convert methane into carbon-di-oxide by oxidizing<br />
up to 90% <strong>of</strong> the CH4 (Krause et al., 2010; Ma et al., 2013). The root treatment <strong>of</strong><br />
methanotrophs is an effective option to mitigate the CH 4 emission (Dash et al., 2019). The<br />
addition <strong>of</strong> basic slag and methanotrophs to the rice soil could reduce the CH 4 emissions by<br />
affecting the physico-chemical and biological properties <strong>of</strong> the soil. So, in this study we<br />
have evaluated the individual as well as combined effect <strong>of</strong> the basic slag and methanotrophs<br />
on the methane emission in lowland rice to mitigate the GHGs emissions in rice by<br />
application <strong>of</strong> basic slag and methanotroph formulation.<br />
Methodology<br />
We have conducted the field trial at the experimental farm <strong>of</strong> ICAR-NRRI, Cuttack, Odisha.<br />
There were 8 treatments and 3 replications, and the experimental design was randomized<br />
block designing (RBD). The gas and soil samples were collected on critical growth stage<br />
(Panicle initiation) <strong>of</strong> rice with three replications for the estimation <strong>of</strong> GHGs emissions and<br />
soil parameters. The GHGs (CH 4, N 2O, and CO 2) fluxes from the rice ecosystems were<br />
estimated continuously at 5-7 days intervals by collecting the gas samples by using the<br />
‘manual close chamber method’ (Bhattacharyya et al., 2013, 2016). The GHGs concentrations<br />
were analyzed by using gas chromatography (Model no: Trace 1110 Gas Chromatograph; M/s<br />
Thermo). Enzymatic activities and carbon pools were estimated in the laboratory by using<br />
standard methods (Nayak et al., 2016).<br />
Treatment details: (i) RDF- recommended dose <strong>of</strong> fertilizer (RDF), 80:40:40:: N: P 2O 5:K 2O<br />
kg ha −1 ; (ii) BS- basic slag (1 t ha -1 ); (iii) BS+MTH (R)- basic slag + methanotroph (root dipbroth));<br />
(iv) BS+MTH (F)- basic slag + methanotroph (formulation as top dressed: acaciabased<br />
at 7 days after transplanting (DAT); (v) BS+MTH (R&F)- basic slag + methanotroph<br />
(root dip-broth + formulation as top dressed, at 28 DAT; (vi) MTH (R)- methanotroph (root<br />
dip-broth); (vii) MTH (F)- methanotroph (formulation as top dressed, at 7 DAT); (viii) MTH<br />
(R&F)- methanotroph (root dip-broth + formulation as top dressed, at 28 DAT).<br />
Results<br />
The soil carbon pools (microbial biomass carbon, readily mineralizable carbon and KMNO 4-<br />
C) and enzymatic activities (Dehydrogenase and fluorescein di-acetate) were highest in BS +<br />
MTH (R&F) treatments at the panicle initiation (PI) stage in lowland rice ecology. The CH4<br />
emission was lower in slag + methanotroph amendments than other treatments. In rice<br />
system, the CH4 fluxes were gradually increased after transplanting and reached at the peak at<br />
PI stage, after that gradually decreased towards harvesting period (Figure 1a). The methane<br />
emission for the treatment BS+MTH (R&F) was lower in relative to the RDF. The seasonal<br />
Climate resilient agriculture for risk mitigation<br />
263 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
CH4 emission was higher in RDF (85.11 kg ha -1 ) and lowest under BS + MTH (R&F) (72.23<br />
kg ha -1 ). The CH4 reduction percentage in BS + MTH (R&F) and MTH (R&F) over RDF,<br />
were 15.1 and 14.8%, respectively (Figure 1b).<br />
a<br />
CH 4 flux (mg m 2 h -1 )<br />
8<br />
6<br />
4<br />
2<br />
0<br />
RDF BS BS+MTH(R)<br />
Days after transplanting<br />
[RDF- recommended dose <strong>of</strong> fertilizer; BS-basic slag; MTH(R)- methanotroph root dip; MTH(F)-<br />
(methanotroph formulation).]<br />
(a) Methane and (b) reduction percentage <strong>of</strong> methane per in rice at different growth stages <strong>of</strong> rice under<br />
different treatments in kharif season.<br />
Conclusion<br />
Our findings indicated that soil amendment with basic slag and methanotrophs enrichment in<br />
rhizosphere could be a sustainable option for mitigating methane emission from lowland rice.<br />
References<br />
Conrad, R., 1996. Soil microorganisms as controllers <strong>of</strong> atmospheric trace gases (H2, CO, CH4,<br />
OCS, N 2O, and NO). Microbio. reviews, 60(4), pp.609-640.<br />
264 | Page<br />
Climate resilient agriculture for risk mitigation
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Gwon, H.S., Khan, M.I., Alam, M.A., Das, S. and Kim, P.J., 2018. Environmental risk<br />
assessment <strong>of</strong> steel-making slags and the potential use <strong>of</strong> LD slag in mitigating methane<br />
emissions and the grain arsenic level in rice (Oryza sativa L.). J. Hazardo. Mat. 353:236-<br />
243.<br />
Jackel, U., Thummes, K. and Kämpfer, P., 2005. Thermophilic methane production and<br />
oxidation in compost. FEMS Microbio. Eco. 52(2), pp.175-184.<br />
Krause, T., Andersson, G., Fröhlich, K. and Vaccaro, A., 2010. Multiple-energy carriers:<br />
modeling <strong>of</strong> production, delivery, and consumption. Proceedings <strong>of</strong> the IEEE, 99(1),<br />
pp.15-27.<br />
Wang, W., Lai, D.Y.F., Abid, A.A., Neogi, S., Xu, X. and Wang, C., 2018. Effects <strong>of</strong> steel slag<br />
and biochar incorporation on active soil organic carbon pools in a subtropical paddy<br />
field. Agron. 8(8), p.135.<br />
T2a-11R-1300<br />
Sustainable Intensification <strong>of</strong> Rainfed Lands through Food-Fodder based<br />
Systems for Climatic Resilience and Fodder Security in Semi-Arid Regions<br />
<strong>of</strong> India<br />
Sunil Kumar<br />
ICAR-Indian Grassland and Fodder Research Institute, Jhansi-284003(UP), INDIA<br />
Globally in rainfed lands, livestock is considered important part <strong>of</strong> agriculture diversification,<br />
income enhancement, and crucial for nutrition enhancement. However, the productivity <strong>of</strong> the<br />
animals is low due to improper nutrition, health care and management in almost all the<br />
developing nations. The availability <strong>of</strong> quality feed and fodder is one <strong>of</strong> the main reasons for<br />
poor performance <strong>of</strong> livestock. The present availability <strong>of</strong> feeds in India is estimated to be<br />
only 40% <strong>of</strong> the total requirement <strong>of</strong> these animals. As per IGFRI Vision 2050 document, in<br />
India, at the current level <strong>of</strong> growth in forage resources, there will be 18.4 % deficit in green<br />
fodder and 13.2% deficit in dry fodder in the year 2050. However, in the current decade, food<br />
security is being pursued at policy and intervention level through appropriate mechanism.<br />
But, feed and fodder security to huge livestock still is questionable in wake <strong>of</strong> changing<br />
climate. IPCC 2022 has highlighted the climate change impacts, risks and vulnerabilities, and<br />
adaptation options. In the present scenario, the sustainable intensification is the approaches to<br />
be pursued through mixed farming in the form <strong>of</strong> the crop-livestock, crop-forestry, crophorticulture<br />
fish-pig, fish-duck, and paddy-fish etc. In developing countries, mixed farming<br />
system is helpful in decreasing the cost <strong>of</strong> production per unit area, increasing income and<br />
productivity and reduce the risk <strong>of</strong> farmers. The research conducted at ICAR-IGFRI, Jhansi,<br />
India has highlighted that in arable lands opportunities lies for adoption <strong>of</strong> food-fodder based<br />
Climate resilient agriculture for risk mitigation<br />
265 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
systems with soil & water conservation practices, livestock-based IFS models, watershed<br />
management, non-conventional fodders and contingent crop planning in vulnerable rainfed<br />
areas. Balanced approach with selection and integration <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>itable and sustainable<br />
practices (food, fodder, fibre, fuel, fruit crops, livestock, fisheries, other subsidiary<br />
enterprises) with scientific NRM practices has been demonstrated and proved to enhance the<br />
productivity and income as well as reduce risk <strong>of</strong> climate variability (Dwivedi et al, 2018,<br />
Palsaniya et al, 2021 and Kumar et al, 2022).Therefore, it is the utmost need that the different<br />
components (Crop: monocrop, mixed/intercrop, multi-tier crops <strong>of</strong> cereals, legumes (pulses),<br />
oilseeds, forage etc; Livestock: milch cow, goat, sheep, poultry, bees; Tree: timber, fuel,<br />
fodder and fruit trees) <strong>of</strong> livelihood along with soil & water conservation measures to be<br />
chosen selectively.<br />
References<br />
Dwivedi, R.N., Tripathi, S.N., Tripathi, S.B., Singh, K.A., Agarwal, R.K., Sahay, C.S.,<br />
Pandey, Sadhna, Dwivedi, P.N., Sunil Kumar, Singh,J.P., Kushwaha, B.P., Sunil<br />
266 | Page<br />
Kumar, Palsaniya D.R., Satyapriya, Narsimhlu, B. and Kumar, Anil, 2018. Enhancing<br />
productivity and livelihood <strong>of</strong> Bundelkhand farmers through crop-livestock based<br />
interventions. Curr. Adv. Agric. Sci. 18 (2): 84-88.<br />
Palsaniya, D.R., Sunil Kumar, Manoj Chaudhary, Khem Chand, Rai, S. K., Akram Ahmed,<br />
Sahay, C.S. and Mukesh Choudhary. 2021. Integrated multi-enterprise agricultural<br />
system for sustaining livelihood, energy use and resource recycling: a case study from<br />
semi-arid tropics <strong>of</strong> central India. Agr<strong>of</strong>or. Sys. 95, 1619–1634.<br />
Kumar Sunil, Purushottam Sharma, Satyapriya, Prabhu Govindasamy, Maharaj Singh, Sant<br />
Kumar, Hanamant, M. Halli and Bishwa Bhaskar Choudhary, 2022. Economic<br />
impression <strong>of</strong> on-farm research for sustainable crop production, milk yield, and<br />
livelihood option in semi-arid region <strong>of</strong> central India, Agron. J.<br />
DOI: 10.1002/agj2.21062.<br />
T2a-12R-1319<br />
Characterizing Different Indian Farming Systems to Assess their Resilience<br />
to Climate Change<br />
Upasna Sharma and Abhilasha Singh*<br />
Indian Institute <strong>of</strong> Technology, Delhi, 110016, India<br />
* Abhilasha.Singh@sopp.iitd.ac.in<br />
It is well established that the most unforgiving wrath <strong>of</strong> anthropogenic climate change is<br />
projected to fall on the agricultural sector due it its direct dependence on ecosystem services.<br />
The Fifth Assessment Report <strong>of</strong> the IPCC has stated with robust evidence that the impact <strong>of</strong><br />
Climate resilient agriculture for risk mitigation
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
climate change on crop production and different aspects <strong>of</strong> food security- access, utilization,<br />
and price stability, is going to be severe (IPCC 2017). Food systems across the world already<br />
experience multiple disruptions from extreme weather events, pest and pathogen attacks,<br />
water scarcity, economic shocks, and depleting natural resources (FAO, 2021). The added<br />
threat <strong>of</strong> climate change will exacerbate these disruptions and the magnitude <strong>of</strong> its impact<br />
would be determined by context-specific vulnerabilities and the resilience <strong>of</strong> agri-food<br />
systems. In a predominantly agrarian country with around 70% <strong>of</strong> the population almost<br />
completely dependent on agriculture for its livelihood, climate change acts as a threat<br />
multiplier for the Indian agrarian sector which is already reeling from multiple crises.<br />
Increased incidence <strong>of</strong> indebtedness, stagnating farm incomes, extreme poverty, growing<br />
distress migration, and rising farmer suicides are just some <strong>of</strong> the indicators <strong>of</strong> ongoing rural<br />
distress.<br />
Considering the complexity <strong>of</strong> challenges faced by agrarian economies like India, a multidisciplinary,<br />
holistic approach is required to make the agricultural ecosystems resilient. The<br />
pressing threat <strong>of</strong> climate change on the already ailing sector cannot be addressed in an<br />
isolated manner by a few technological fixes without considering the existing socio-economic<br />
context, and the local perspectives. Assessing the resilience <strong>of</strong> agroecosystems is a systemic<br />
approach to see if they can mobilize resources, identify opportunities, implement strategies,<br />
develop processes and transform in the face <strong>of</strong> a disturbance or unpredicted change (Cabell &<br />
Oel<strong>of</strong>se, 2012; Darnh<strong>of</strong>er, 2014). It is predicated on the understanding that each farming<br />
system has certain micro and macro level characteristics ranging from socio-economic<br />
circumstances, demography, cropping systems, and farming strategies to institutions,<br />
ecosystem health, market linkages, and its agro-climatic context. These characteristics<br />
determine the level <strong>of</strong> resilience <strong>of</strong> a farming system to sudden shocks and long-term stresses.<br />
This approach can provide invaluable insights for adaptive management and governance in<br />
heterogeneous agricultural landscapes.<br />
Methodology<br />
While there is no dearth <strong>of</strong> research available on the sector’s vulnerability to climate change,<br />
there exists a knowledge gap when it comes to studying the different farming practices and<br />
comparing their relative adaptive capacities and vulnerabilities to climate change. The paper<br />
seeks to address this gap by exploring the diversity <strong>of</strong> Indian agroecosystems to better<br />
understand the process <strong>of</strong> developing climate resilience. Based on an extensive review <strong>of</strong> the<br />
literature, the paper identifies two things – first, the different farming systems existing in<br />
India; and second, the characteristics/indicators <strong>of</strong> an agricultural system that make it resilient<br />
to climate shocks and other stressors. These characteristics will then be used in a later study<br />
for a comparative analysis <strong>of</strong> different farming systems in India concerning their climate<br />
resilience.<br />
Climate resilient agriculture for risk mitigation<br />
267 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Results<br />
Different farming systems in different agro-climatic zones have different capacities to absorb<br />
climate shocks. In India, farmers have adopted a diverse range <strong>of</strong> farming practices suited to<br />
their specific climatic and cultural contexts. On the one hand, we have traditional smallholder<br />
subsistence farming systems like dryland agriculture, terrace farming, and shifting<br />
cultivation, on the other hand, irrigated farming systems that are input-intensive and chemical<br />
based have become prevalent as modern industrial agriculture ever since the Green<br />
Revolution. Sustainable agriculture forms the third category <strong>of</strong> farming systems in India that<br />
seeks to promote the use <strong>of</strong> traditional farming knowledge and agronomic practices alongside<br />
modern technological innovations in a manner that improves crop yields while also reducing<br />
the ecological footprint <strong>of</strong> agriculture. Such systems range from organic farming, precision<br />
agriculture, and conservation agriculture to more alternative farming systems based on<br />
agroecological principles. In fact, recently, many smallholder farming communities in states<br />
like Telangana and Karnataka are now switching to more sustainable, agroecology-based<br />
farming practices by employing their traditional, indigenous knowledge.<br />
Building resilience to climate change requires an in-depth understanding <strong>of</strong> the vulnerability,<br />
adaptive capacity as well as ability <strong>of</strong> each farming system to bounce back after a climate<br />
shock. These three attributes may vary across systems depending on characteristics such as<br />
farmers’ perceptions and experiences, their knowledge about climate change threats, and the<br />
available institutional mechanisms that facilitate access to credit, production <strong>of</strong> knowledge,<br />
and market access. An exploration <strong>of</strong> these attributes will help us to develop a framework to<br />
assess and compare the resilience capacities <strong>of</strong> different farming systems in a subsequent<br />
study.<br />
References<br />
Cabell, J. F., and Oel<strong>of</strong>se, M. 2012. An Indicator Framework for Assessing Agroecosystem<br />
Resilience. Eco. Soc. 17(1). https://www.jstor.org/stable/26269017<br />
Darnh<strong>of</strong>er, I. 2014. Resilience and why it matters for farm management. European Review <strong>of</strong><br />
Agric. Econ. 41(3), 461–484. https://doi.org/10.1093/erae/jbu012<br />
FAO. 2021. The State <strong>of</strong> Food and Agriculture 2021: Making agrifood systems more resilient<br />
to shocks and stresses. FAO. https://doi.org/10.4060/cb4476en<br />
IPCC, 2014: Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Part A: Global<br />
and Sectoral Aspects. Contribution <strong>of</strong> Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report<br />
<strong>of</strong> the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press,<br />
Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, 1132 pp.<br />
268 | Page<br />
Climate resilient agriculture for risk mitigation
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
T2a-13R-1587<br />
Impact <strong>of</strong> Climate Resilient Interventions in NICRA Village Rupana <strong>of</strong><br />
Sirsa District in Haryana<br />
D.S. Jakhar, Vinita Rajput and Sunil Kumar<br />
Krishi Vigyan Kendra Sirsa, Haryana- 125055<br />
Climate change has affected crop yield, livestock production and soil health, adversely. The<br />
rainfed agro-ecological areas <strong>of</strong> Haryana are experiencing weather extremes such as heat<br />
wave, depleting groundwater levels, salinity, and erratic rainfall. To address these climate<br />
constraints and with an aim to develop climate resilient sustainable ecosystem, NICRA<br />
project was launched in 2011. For NICRA project, a village Rupana in block Nathusari<br />
Chopta was adopted by Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Sirsa as the village addressed few climatic<br />
vulnerabilities. The village has a total cultivable area <strong>of</strong> about 780 ha out <strong>of</strong> which 70 ha area<br />
is rainfed, 60 ha area is salt affected. The main cropping patterns <strong>of</strong> the village are Cottonwheat,<br />
Paddy- wheat and Guar –Mustard. The soil specific and crop specific vulnerabilities<br />
were identified and based on these constraints, suitable interventions were demonstrated to<br />
the farmers.<br />
Methodology<br />
In the present study impact <strong>of</strong> two successful interventions has been described. To address<br />
the issue <strong>of</strong> water conservation, use <strong>of</strong> Laser leveler was demonstrated to the farmers. To<br />
address another climatic constraint <strong>of</strong> para wilt in cotton, occurring due to adverse weather<br />
conditions in the month <strong>of</strong> September, use <strong>of</strong> Cobalt Chloride @ 10 ppm was demonstrated.<br />
The demonstrated were conducted in the fields <strong>of</strong> selected farmers and fields were visited by<br />
the scientists from time to time. The data <strong>of</strong> yield were collected at the harvesting stage and<br />
BC ratio was calculated after discussion with farmer.<br />
Results<br />
Both the interventions were highly successful in the existing agro-climatic conditions <strong>of</strong> the<br />
village and effectively minimized the effect <strong>of</strong> climate stress. The use <strong>of</strong> laser leveler has<br />
resulted in increase in benefit cost (BC) ratio to the tune <strong>of</strong> 3.19 in demonstration fields with<br />
the 8.8 percent increase in crop yield, whereas, the respective value <strong>of</strong> BC ratio in farmer<br />
practice was 3.13. Use <strong>of</strong> laser leveler reduced the pumping hours per irrigation, and hence<br />
saved significant amount <strong>of</strong> irrigation water in paddy cultivation. The saving <strong>of</strong> water by the<br />
use <strong>of</strong> laser leveler has also been reported by Jat et al. (2015) and Naresh et al. (2014).<br />
Similarly, use <strong>of</strong> cobalt chloride 0.01 percent immediately after appearance <strong>of</strong> symptoms in<br />
cotton has effectively managed the problem <strong>of</strong> parawilt. A 20.3 percent increase in yield was<br />
Climate resilient agriculture for risk mitigation<br />
269 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
recorded from the demonstration plot as compared to farmer practice. The BC ratio in<br />
demonstration plot (1.1) was higher as compared to farmer practice (1.6).<br />
Effect <strong>of</strong> cobalt chloride foliar spray on yield and economics <strong>of</strong> Bt Cotton<br />
Intervention<br />
Area<br />
(ha)<br />
No.<br />
Farmers<br />
Crop yield<br />
(q/ha)<br />
Cost <strong>of</strong><br />
cultivation<br />
(Rs./ha)<br />
Gross<br />
return<br />
(Rs./ha)<br />
Net<br />
return<br />
(Rs./ha)<br />
Farmers practice 2 5 8 35900 40000 4100 1.1<br />
Demo 20 25 12 36200 60000 23800 1.6<br />
B:C<br />
ratio<br />
The results are in line the findings <strong>of</strong> Sarlach & Kaur (2013) and Singh et al. (2018) who<br />
observed reduced incidence <strong>of</strong> para wilt after application <strong>of</strong> 10 ppm cobalt chloride in cotton.<br />
Results are in line with Sarlach et.al (2008) who observed that foliar application <strong>of</strong> ethylene<br />
inhibitor (Cobalt chloride 10 μg mL -1 during 36-48 hrs.) after irrigation helped in complete<br />
recovery from parawilt within 5-7 days <strong>of</strong> spray. However, there was no recovery when<br />
permanent wilting has already set in.<br />
Conclusion<br />
Owing to better results in the demonstration <strong>of</strong> climate resilient interventions, their adoption<br />
percent increased among the farmers with time and presently hundreds <strong>of</strong> farmers in NICRA<br />
village and nearby villages having similar agro-ecological conditions are practicing these<br />
interventions.<br />
References<br />
Sarlach, R. S. and Kaur, G. 2013. Control <strong>of</strong> parawilt in different Bt cotton hybrids in Punjab,<br />
India. Eco. Env. & Cons., 19 : 521-23.<br />
Singh, G., Singh, P., Singh, K., Sodhi, G. P. S. and Sekhon, B. S. 2021. Economic Analysis<br />
<strong>of</strong> Parawilt Management in Bt-Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) in Mansa District <strong>of</strong><br />
South-western Punjab, India. Ind. J. Ext. Edu. 58(1), 93–96.<br />
Gill, G. 2014. An assessment <strong>of</strong> the impact <strong>of</strong> laser-assisted precision land levelling<br />
technology as a component <strong>of</strong> climate-smart agriculture in the state <strong>of</strong> Haryana,<br />
India. New Delhi, India: CIMMYT-CCAFS, International Maize and Wheat<br />
Improvement Center (CIMMYT).<br />
Jat, M., Singh, Y., Gill, G., Sidhu, H., Aryal, J. P., Stirling, C. and Gerard, B. 2015. Laser<br />
assisted precision land leveling: Impacts in irrigated intensive production systems <strong>of</strong><br />
South Asia. In Advances in soil science, Ed. R. Lal, and B. A. Stewart, 323–52.<br />
Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group.<br />
270 | Page<br />
Climate resilient agriculture for risk mitigation
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Naresh, R., Singh, S., Misra, A., Tomar, S., Kumar, P., Kumar, V. and Kumar, S. 2014.<br />
Evaluation <strong>of</strong> the laser leveled land leveling technology on crop yield and water use<br />
productivity in Western Uttar Pradesh. Afr J Agric Res. 9 (4):473–78.<br />
doi:10.5897/AJAR12.1741.<br />
Sarlach, R.S., Sekhon, P.S., Sohu, R., and Gill, M.S. 2008. Parawilt in Bt cotton and its<br />
amelioration. Eco. Env. & Cons., 14 (2): 323-26.<br />
T2a-14P-1049<br />
On-farm Assessment <strong>of</strong> Climate Resilient Interventions for Sustaining<br />
Crop Productivity in Rainfed Eco-System<br />
M.S.Pendke*, W. N. Narkhede, B.V. Asewar, P.H. Gourkhede and D.P. Waskar<br />
AICRP on Dryland Agriculture, Vasantrao Naik Marathwada Krishi Vidyapeeth, Parbhani 431 402<br />
*pendkemadan@gmail.com<br />
Marathwada region <strong>of</strong> Maharashtra state majorly comes under assured rainfall zone. The<br />
climate <strong>of</strong> Marathwada experiences wide inter districts and intra districts variability. The<br />
mean annual rainfall <strong>of</strong> the zone is 880 mm. The occurrence <strong>of</strong> frequent droughts and<br />
unseasonal rains are the features <strong>of</strong> climate change in the region.The way to stabilize and<br />
enhance productivity in dryland agriculture lies with strategies which consists <strong>of</strong> the adoption<br />
<strong>of</strong> intercropping, rainwater harvesting & supplementary irrigation systems, foliar<br />
applicationand the adoption <strong>of</strong> in-situ moisture conservation practices. The rainfed<br />
technologies developed by the AICRPDA Centre were evaluated on the farmer’s field.<br />
Methodology<br />
The methodology involves the experimentation based on developed climate resilient<br />
technologies and its evaluation and validation on farmer’s field with respect to rainfed<br />
agriculture in Marathwada region. The climate resilient technologies viz., broad bed and<br />
furrow techniques, conservation furrow, intercropping, stress management, and protective<br />
irrigation through farm ponds were evaluated.<br />
Results<br />
The pooled data (2017-20) on soybean and cotton productivity, monetary returns, B:C ratio<br />
and rain water use efficiency as influenced by different treatments is presented in Tables.<br />
Climate resilient agriculture for risk mitigation<br />
271 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Soybean crop yield, monetary returns, B:C ratio and rain water use efficiency as<br />
influenced by different treatments<br />
Treatments<br />
Soybean yield (kg<br />
ha -1 )<br />
GMR (Rs.)<br />
NMR<br />
(Rs.)<br />
B:C<br />
Ratio<br />
RWUE (kg<br />
ha -1 mm -1 )<br />
L 1 : Flat Bed 837 26799 6128.7 1.30 2.93<br />
L 2 : BBF 1022 32689 12144.0 1.59 3.58<br />
L 3 : Ridges & Furrow 930 29745 9075.3 1.44 3.26<br />
SE + 28.36 602.96 602.9 - -<br />
CD 84.73 1668.7 1668.7 - -<br />
Cotton seed yield, monetary returns, B:C ratio and rain water use efficiency as<br />
influenced by different treatments<br />
Treatments<br />
Seed cotton yield<br />
(kg ha -1 )<br />
GMR (Rs.)<br />
NMR<br />
(Rs.)<br />
B:C<br />
Ratio<br />
RWUE (kg<br />
ha -1 mm -1 )<br />
L1 :Flat Bed 732.0 32940 5911 1.18 2.56<br />
L 2 : BBF 916.1 41227 7746 1.23 3.21<br />
L 3 : Ridges & Furrow 853.1 38392 5911 1.18 2.99<br />
SE + 10.05 324.7 324.7 -- -<br />
CD at 5% 27.83 898.8 898.8 -- -<br />
The effect <strong>of</strong> land configurations on productivity was found significant. The productivity <strong>of</strong><br />
soybean and cotton was recorded by treatment sowing on BBF was found significantly higher<br />
than sowing on flatbed. The significantly higher GMR, NMR, BC ratio and RWUE were<br />
observed with treatment sowing on BBF which was found significantly higher than other<br />
treatments. Singh (2011) found that BBF technology is effective to overcome moisture stress<br />
and increase in soybean yield. The pooled data on seed cotton yield, monetary returns, B:C<br />
ratio and rain water use efficiency as influenced by various stress management practices is<br />
presented in Table.<br />
Cotton seed yield, monetary returns, B:C ratio and rain water use efficiency as<br />
Treatments<br />
influenced by different treatments (2016-20)<br />
Seed<br />
cotton<br />
yield (kg<br />
ha -1 )<br />
GMR<br />
(Rs.)<br />
NMR<br />
(Rs.)<br />
B:C<br />
Ratio<br />
RWUE<br />
(kg ha -1<br />
mm -1 )<br />
T 1: RDF 687.0 30915 1218 1.04 2.41<br />
T 2: RDF + Straw mulch (35 and 65 DAS) 869.0 39105 5998 1.18 3.04<br />
T 3: RDF + Foliar application <strong>of</strong> Antitransparent<br />
Kaolin (35 and 65 DAS)<br />
752.0 33840 318 1.00 2.63<br />
272 | Page<br />
Climate resilient agriculture for risk mitigation
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
T 4: RDF + Foliar application <strong>of</strong> KNO 3 (35<br />
and 65 DAS)<br />
T 5: RDF + Foliar application <strong>of</strong> NPK<br />
(19:19:19) (35 and 65 DAS)<br />
T 6: RDF + Foliar application <strong>of</strong> MOP (35<br />
and 65 DAS)<br />
T 7: RDF + Foliar application <strong>of</strong> Thiourea<br />
(@ 250 g ha -1 at 35 and 65 DAS)<br />
898.0 40410 7158 1.21 3.15<br />
853.0 38385 6258 1.19 2.99<br />
799.0 35955 4397 1.13 2.80<br />
740.0 33300 2188 1.07 2.59<br />
T 8: RDF + Water sprays (35 and 65 DAS) 718.0 32310 2062 1.06 2.51<br />
T 9: 75% RDF + 25% through FYM 659.0 29655 -1347 0.95 2.31<br />
T 10 :75% RDF + Foliar application<br />
<strong>of</strong> KNO 3 (35 and 65 DAS)<br />
825.0 37125 5738 1.18 2.89<br />
SE + 59.33 826.4 147.7 -- -<br />
CD at 5% 177.50 2451.9 438.2 -- -<br />
Mean 780.0 35100 3399 1.10 2.73<br />
The effect <strong>of</strong> various stress management practices on cotton seed yield was found significant.<br />
The treatment T 4 i.e. RDF +KNO 3 exhibited the highest seed cotton yield <strong>of</strong> 898.0 kg ha -1 which was<br />
significantly superior over control, T9 and T10 and found at par with the rest <strong>of</strong> all the treatments.<br />
Pooled data indicated that cotton + soybean intercropping system recorded significantly superior<br />
seed cotton equivalent yield (2120 kg ha -1 ) than other cropping systems. Soybean + Pigeonpea<br />
and Sorghum + Pigeonpea recorded at par seed cotton equivalent yield. Conservation furrow in<br />
pigeonpea crop increased the yield <strong>of</strong> pigeon pea by 26.57 per cent. Whereas in the case <strong>of</strong> the<br />
soybean crop the yield was increased by 25.77 per cent due to conservation furrow over no<br />
furrow opening. The treatment <strong>of</strong> two protective irrigations at branching and flowering stages<br />
recorded significantly higher safflower yield over control.<br />
Conclusion<br />
All the climate resilient interventions proved better in respect <strong>of</strong> increase in crop yield with<br />
increased monetary returns and proved agricultural sustainability in the region under rainfed<br />
farming<br />
References<br />
Singh, D.V., Vyas, A.K., Gupta, G.K., Ramteke, R and Khan, I.R. 2011. Tractor drawn broad bed<br />
furrow seed drill machine to overcome moisture stress for soybean in vertisols. Indian J. Agric.<br />
Sci., 81:941-944<br />
Climate resilient agriculture for risk mitigation<br />
273 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
T2a-15P-1069<br />
Evaluation <strong>of</strong> Mustard [Brassica juncea (L.) Czern and Coss] Varieties to<br />
Staggered Sowing in Changing Climatic Scenarios under Custard Apple<br />
based Agri-Horti System<br />
Rajnish Pandey, Sudhir Kumar Rajpoot, D.E. Nirmal, Miryala Sushma and A.K. Nema<br />
Banaras Hindu University Varanasi (UP)–221 005 India.<br />
The prospect <strong>of</strong> changing the global climate has piqued scientists' interest, as these changes<br />
are having a severe influence on global crop productivity and jeopardizing global food<br />
security. Due to its high sensitivity to environmental factors, the mustard yield may be<br />
significantly impacted by climate change (Boomiraj et al., 2021). Negative growth rates in<br />
mustard yield since 1997 may have been caused by unfavorable monsoon conditions, which<br />
led to water stress (drought and excessive rainfall) and temperature increase. Temperature<br />
cannot be easily altered in the field, but sowing time can be adjusted such that the various<br />
physiological phases <strong>of</strong> the crop coincide with specified (most suited) temperature during the<br />
crop growth cycle, which is the most important non-monetary input for increasing production<br />
(Deshmukh and Patel, 2013). Selecting appropriate cultivars can also help to mitigate the<br />
negative impacts <strong>of</strong> delayed sowing on productivity, as the extent <strong>of</strong> yield reduction varies<br />
with variety (Lal et al., 2017).<br />
Methodology<br />
A field experiment was conducted to evaluate the effect on mustard [Brassica juncea(L.)<br />
Czern and Coss] varieties to staggered sowing in changing climatic scenario under custard<br />
apple based agri-horti system at Agricultural Research Farm, Rajiv Gandhi South Campus,<br />
Banaras Hindu University, Barkachha, Mirzapur, Uttar Pradesh during the rabi season <strong>of</strong><br />
2021-22 in a split plot design with three replications. The main plot treatments were three<br />
planting dates (S1: 15 th October, S2:30 th October, and S3:15 th November), while the subplots<br />
were five distinct mustard varieties (Pitambari, RH-725, Giriraj, RH-749, and Kranti).<br />
Results<br />
Among the varieties, Giriraj outperformed other varieties in terms <strong>of</strong> growth, and yield<br />
parameters. Late sown (November) mustard crop exhibited more decline in yield, and yield<br />
characteristics than October sown crop, however among the varieties, Giriraj demonstrated<br />
more resistance to projected climate change than other varieties. The highest seed yield was<br />
recorded when the crop was sown on the 30 th <strong>of</strong> October ((1536.89 kg ha -1 ), followed by the<br />
15 th <strong>of</strong> October (1372.78 kg ha -1 ), and the lowest yield was recorded when the crop was sown<br />
on 15 th <strong>of</strong> November (1178.47 kg ha -1 ). Variety Giriraj had the highest seed yield (1583.27 kg<br />
ha -1 ), followed by variety RH-725(1499.75 kg ha -1 ), RH-0749 (1382.58 kg ha -1 ) Kranti<br />
274 | Page<br />
Climate resilient agriculture for risk mitigation
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
(1258.90 kg ha -1 ) and variety Pitambari had the lowest seed yield (1089.08 kg ha -1 ). The oil<br />
yield varied greatly depending on the date <strong>of</strong> sowing. The crop planted on the 30 th <strong>of</strong> October<br />
recorded highest oil yield (609.66 kg ha -1 ), followed by the crop sown on the 15 th <strong>of</strong> October<br />
(527.98 kg ha -1 ). The crop sown on the 15 th <strong>of</strong> November produced the lowest oil yield<br />
(446.48 kg ha -1 ). The oil yield was greatly impacted by different varieties <strong>of</strong> Indian mustard.<br />
The variety Giriraj had the highest oil yield (593.89 kg ha -1 ), followed by RH-725 (578.94 kg<br />
ha -1 ), RH-0749 (558.63 kg ha -1 ), and Kranti (473.29 kg ha -1 ) while the variety Pitambari had<br />
the lowest (435.45 kg ha -1 ). However, S2 (30 th October) yielded the highest net return <strong>of</strong> Rs.<br />
168435.96, followed by S 1 (15 th October) yielding Rs. 157596.66, and S 3 (15 th November)<br />
yielding Rs. 144625.81 which is the least among all.<br />
Effect <strong>of</strong> sowing dates and varieties onseed yield (kg ha -1 ), oil yield (kg ha -1 ), total cost <strong>of</strong><br />
cultivation (Rs ha -1 ) and net return (Rs ha -1 ) under custard apple based agri-horti<br />
system.<br />
Treatment<br />
Sowing Dates<br />
Seed yield<br />
(kg ha -1 )<br />
Climate resilient agriculture for risk mitigation<br />
Oil Yield (kg<br />
ha -1 )<br />
Total cost <strong>of</strong><br />
cultivation (Rs ha -1 )<br />
Net return (Rs<br />
ha -1 )<br />
S1 (15 th October) 1372.78 527.98 59776.12 157596.66<br />
S2 (30 th October) 1536.89 609.66 59776.12 168435.96<br />
S3 (15 th November) 1178.47 446.48 59776.12 144625.81<br />
CD = (P = 0.05) 212.87 72.12 - 13956.00<br />
Varieties<br />
V1 (Pitambari) 1089.08 435.45 59783.32 136889.33<br />
V2 (RH-725) 1499.75 578.94 59783.32 166489.66<br />
V3 (Giriraj) 1583.27 593.89 59783.32 172033.52<br />
V4 (RH-0749) 1382.58 558.63 59783.32 158672.93<br />
V5 (Kranti) 1258.90 473.29 59783.32 150345.28<br />
CD (P = 0.05) 75.62 43.24 - 4853.28<br />
References<br />
Boomiraj, K., Chakrabarti, B., Aggarwal, P. K., Choudhary, R., and Chander, S. 2010.<br />
Assessing the vulnerability <strong>of</strong> Indian mustard to climate change. Agric. Ecosyst. and<br />
environ. 138 (3-4), 265-273.<br />
Deshmukh, S. P., and Patel, J. G. 2013. Influence <strong>of</strong> Non-monetary and Low-Cost Input in<br />
Sustainable Summer Pearlmillet (Penistum glaucumL.) Production. Int. J. <strong>of</strong> Agric<br />
Food Sci. Technol. 4 (6), 579-588.<br />
Lal, B., Gautam, P., Panda, B. B., Raja, R., Singh, T., Tripathi, R., and Nayak, A. K. 2017.<br />
Crop and varietal diversification <strong>of</strong> rainfed rice-based cropping systems for higher<br />
productivity and pr<strong>of</strong>itability in Eastern India. PLoS One 12 (4), e0175709.<br />
275 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
T2a-16P-1077<br />
Assessment <strong>of</strong> Different System <strong>of</strong> Rice Cultivation Technique for<br />
Combating Climatic Aberrations in Rainfed Medium Land Situation <strong>of</strong><br />
Purulia District <strong>of</strong> West Bengal, India during kharif season<br />
S.K. Bhattacharya, B. Maity A. Chakraborty, M.K. Bhattacharjya, S. Thakur,<br />
P. Biswas and J. Gorain<br />
Krishi Vigyan Kendra Kalyan, Purulia, 723147, West Bengal, India<br />
kvkkalyanpurulia@gmail.com<br />
Rice is the staple food for 65% population <strong>of</strong> India which is increasing at a rate <strong>of</strong> 1.6% per<br />
year. Considering climatic aberrations like delayed onset <strong>of</strong> monsoon, intermittent drought<br />
and abnormally high temperature results in, not only transplanting <strong>of</strong> over-aged seedlings<br />
with low productivity, but also a major portion <strong>of</strong> rainfed Rice area remain fallow that<br />
brought down the overall area under rice cultivation during kharif season. Hence, there is a<br />
need to increase the productivity <strong>of</strong> rice to feed the burgeoning population under changing<br />
climatic situation. Field experiments were conducted to assess the suitability <strong>of</strong> System <strong>of</strong><br />
Rice Intensification (SRI) and Direct seeding <strong>of</strong> pre-germinated paddy seeds using Paddy<br />
Drum Seeder with Farmers’ practices <strong>of</strong> transplanting rice variety MTU-7029 under rainfed<br />
medium land situation. The experiment was conducted in Jahajpur KVK instructional farm<br />
and Haramjanga (NICRA Village <strong>of</strong> KVK,), village <strong>of</strong> Purulia, West Bengal for the last three<br />
consecutive years. The results show SRI method and Direct seeding <strong>of</strong> pre-germinated paddy<br />
seeds using Paddy Drum Seeder. Both significantly out-yielded Farmer’s Practice <strong>of</strong><br />
transplanting by 58.59% and 8.19% respectively. Moreover, the cost <strong>of</strong> weed management<br />
using cono weeder in SRI field and Direct Seeding was also reduced by 433.33% and<br />
263.63% respectively when it is compared with Farmer’s Practice <strong>of</strong> rice cultivation. It has<br />
also been revealed that improved technologies like SRI and Direct seeding <strong>of</strong> pre-germinated<br />
paddy seeds resulted higher net income Rs. 28,300.00/ha with a B:C ratio <strong>of</strong> 1.87 and Rs.<br />
10,220.00 with a B:C ratio 1.52 respectively as compared to Farmer’s Practice <strong>of</strong> rice<br />
cultivation <strong>of</strong> Rs. 5560.00 with a B:C ratio 1.36. Hence it may be concluded from the study<br />
that, SRI method <strong>of</strong> rice transplanting was found to be superior in producing more rice with<br />
less quantity <strong>of</strong> inputs such as water, seed, fertilizers and labour in view <strong>of</strong> combating<br />
climatic aberrations and stabilises the productivity with higher return.<br />
276 | Page<br />
Climate resilient agriculture for risk mitigation
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
T2a-17P-1120<br />
Musk Melon Cultivation on Reservoir Basin: A Climate Smart and<br />
Pr<strong>of</strong>itable Farmer Practice in Arid Zone <strong>of</strong> Rajasthan<br />
Chandan Kumar*, Dheeraj Singh, M. K. Chaudhary and Arvind Singh<br />
ICAR-CAZRI, Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Pali (Rajasthan) India<br />
* chandan.kumar@icar.gov.in<br />
The harsh climatic condition and poor quality <strong>of</strong> soil and water in arid region <strong>of</strong> Rajasthan<br />
make crop production very challenging. Only hardy crop species with very less water<br />
requirement is grown in these areas mainly in kharif or rabi season where assured irrigation<br />
is available. Mean annual rainfall in the region varies from about 500 mm along the slope <strong>of</strong><br />
the Aravallis in the east to 100 mm along the border with Pakistan in the west, more than<br />
85% <strong>of</strong> which is received during the period <strong>of</strong> South West monsoon (June-September). The<br />
mean annual potential evapo-transpiration exceeds precipitation by a wide margin (1400-<br />
2000 mm). Crop failure is a common feature either due to inadequacy <strong>of</strong> rainfall or due to<br />
shortage <strong>of</strong> soil moisture to meet the crop water requirements during different phenophases<br />
(Faroda et al. 2007). Besides this, the arid region has several biotic and abiotic limitations<br />
that are responsible for low productivity. Under these conditions local farmers utilized agro<br />
ecological knowledge to convert stress into opportunity with autonomous adaptation. One <strong>of</strong><br />
such example is the cultivation <strong>of</strong> vegetable and fruits in the reservoir basin during winter<br />
and summer season in the arid zone <strong>of</strong> Rajasthan. The small and landless farmers residing in<br />
the catchment area <strong>of</strong> the reservoir realized the potential <strong>of</strong> the soil <strong>of</strong> reservoir basin and<br />
started to cultivate it for the production <strong>of</strong> vegetables on residual soil moisture. However, the<br />
crop yield and pr<strong>of</strong>itability is poor due to fast depletion <strong>of</strong> soil moisture in the absence <strong>of</strong> soil<br />
moisture conservation technologies.<br />
Gradually, several indigenous knowledge or practices has been evolved to enhance<br />
conservation <strong>of</strong> residual soil moisture, productivity and pr<strong>of</strong>itability <strong>of</strong> the cultivation in this<br />
basin. Such an indigenous technology includes production <strong>of</strong> musk melon in the reservoir<br />
basin <strong>of</strong> Hemawas Dam, Pali with indigenous knowledge that is similar to modern concept <strong>of</strong><br />
conservation agriculture. Therefore, we evaluated and compared the socio-economic aspects<br />
<strong>of</strong> indigenously evolved conservation agricultural practices for the cultivation <strong>of</strong> musk melon<br />
in the reservoir basin <strong>of</strong> Hemawas dam with conventional practices <strong>of</strong> musk melon<br />
production.<br />
Climate resilient agriculture for risk mitigation<br />
277 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Methodology<br />
The present study is comprised <strong>of</strong> study<br />
and documentation <strong>of</strong> indigenously<br />
developed conservation technologies for<br />
musk melon cultivation in the reservoir<br />
basin and its comparison with<br />
conventional methods <strong>of</strong> musk melon<br />
cultivation. For this purpose, we selected<br />
10 farmers practicing musk melon<br />
cultivation in the hamawas dam with<br />
indigenous knowledge (25.7343 0 North<br />
latitude and 73.3620 0 East longitudes) and<br />
10 farmers practicing conventional<br />
practice <strong>of</strong> musk melon on the<br />
conventional agricultural land in Naya<br />
Gaon village Sojat Tehsil (25.9238 0 North<br />
latitude and 73.6651 0 East longitudes) Pali<br />
District (Fig). The data on all the<br />
agronomical practices and plant growth,<br />
development and yield attributes were recorded for consecutively for three years (2017, 2018<br />
and 2019) from the field <strong>of</strong> all the selected farmers. From each location, five average size<br />
muskmelon plant and fruits were selected in each year, and data were recorded on different<br />
parameters and economics were calculated on the basis <strong>of</strong> cost <strong>of</strong> cultivation and price <strong>of</strong><br />
fruit prevailing during the period. The mean <strong>of</strong> the data was subjected to analysis <strong>of</strong> variance<br />
(ANOVA) followed by post hoc test at 95% for comparing the significance <strong>of</strong> difference.<br />
Results<br />
Fig : Location map <strong>of</strong> the study area<br />
The growth and yield <strong>of</strong> the musk melon was influenced by both type <strong>of</strong> the cultivation<br />
practice. The growth, development and fruit yield was found significantly higher in<br />
conventional methods <strong>of</strong> cultivation as compared to traditional conservational practices. The<br />
conventional method had higher growth, number <strong>of</strong> fruits per vine (14.7), fruit weight (391.1<br />
g) and fruit yield per plant (5.77 kg) as compared to conservational practices in the reservoir<br />
basin (Table 1, 2 and 3) resulting into higher yield and gross as well as net returns per unit<br />
area. The mean fruits yield per hectare <strong>of</strong> muskmelon was about 25.16 % higher (96.2 t/ha) as<br />
compared to conservation practices (71.99 t/ha) over three years <strong>of</strong> observation. The gross<br />
return was Rs. 5,28,070/ha under conventional methods <strong>of</strong> cultivation while it was Rs.<br />
3,48,220/ha under conservation methods <strong>of</strong> cultivation over three years <strong>of</strong> observation. The<br />
higher yield under conventional system might be attributed to good plant growth due to<br />
278 | Page<br />
Climate resilient agriculture for risk mitigation
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
combined availability <strong>of</strong> soil moisture with proper nutrition and plant protection throughout<br />
the muskmelon growth period. The above results are close conformity with the various<br />
reporters in other crops (Anbumani et al. 2017; Ansary and Roy 2005; Rani et al. 2012).<br />
However, in spite <strong>of</strong> higher yield and net return under conventional systems, the conservation<br />
system was found more pr<strong>of</strong>itable as compared to conventional systems due to significantly<br />
higher benefit cost ratio. It was mainly attributed to low input cost and early maturity <strong>of</strong> the<br />
crops under conservation system as compared to conventional system. Early availability <strong>of</strong><br />
musk melon fruit to the market fetched higher price per unit <strong>of</strong> fruits as compared to late<br />
mature crop under conventional systems resulting in higher B:C ratio combined with low cost<br />
<strong>of</strong> inputs. Further, the consumers preferred the muskmelons grown under conserved moisture<br />
conditions and they pay premium prices for crop due to earliness.<br />
References<br />
Anbumani, S., Nagarajan, R., Pandian, B.J., 2017. Water productivity and pr<strong>of</strong>itability <strong>of</strong><br />
melon-based cropping system under drip fertigation and polyethylene mulching. J.<br />
Innov. Agric. 4(4): 1–8<br />
Ansary, S. H., Roy, D. C., 2005. Effect <strong>of</strong> irrigation and mulching on growth, yield and<br />
quality <strong>of</strong> watermelon (Citrullus lanatus Thunb). Environ Ecol. 23 (Spl-1): 141–143<br />
Faroda, A.S., Joshi, N.L., Singh, R., Saxena, A. 2007. Resource management for sustainable<br />
crop production in arid zone – A review. Indian J Agron. 52(3): 181–93<br />
Rani, R., Nirla, S. K., Suresh, R. 2012. Effect <strong>of</strong> drip irrigation and mulch on pointed gourd<br />
in calcareous soil <strong>of</strong> north Bihar. Environ Ecol. 30(3): 641–645.<br />
T2a-18P-1206<br />
Effect <strong>of</strong> Different Types <strong>of</strong> Mulching on Growth and Productivity <strong>of</strong><br />
Pointed Gourd under Stress Climatic Condition<br />
C. Saha Parya, S. Biswas, F. H. Rahman and K. Mondal<br />
Dhaanyaganga Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Ramakrishna Mission Ashrama, Sargachhi under aegis<br />
RKMVERI, Belur-Math, Howrah, WB, India,<br />
ATARI, Eastern Zone, ICAR, Kolkata, WB, India<br />
The earliest known example where the use <strong>of</strong> mulch as an agricultural technique was<br />
discussed in written record comes from China, around 500 BC. Since then the benefit <strong>of</strong><br />
mulching is well established. The main benefits <strong>of</strong> mulching are early crop production, higher<br />
yields with better product quality, more efficient water use, reduced leaching <strong>of</strong> fertilizers,<br />
soil and wind erosion, reduced herbicide application, weed control, and others related to pest<br />
and disease management (Lamont, 2005). Some <strong>of</strong> these benefits are especially relevant in<br />
Climate resilient agriculture for risk mitigation<br />
279 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
organic farming, rainfed condition, areas with limited resource facilities and also present<br />
scenario <strong>of</strong> climate change. Under climate change scenario, agriculture is experiencing<br />
adverse effects <strong>of</strong> increasing temperature, shifting seasonal rainfall and frequent occurrence<br />
<strong>of</strong> natural calamity. As a consequence, the time has come when farming should not always be<br />
input responsive rather it should be conservative in nature and to be planned in manner for<br />
efficient utilization <strong>of</strong> available resources. In the operational area, the pointed gourd is<br />
generally experiencing a long dry spell (from the time <strong>of</strong> planting to next 3-4 months crop<br />
growth period) as well as low crop growth rate, weed population hinder the crop production.<br />
Thus present investigation was planned to evaluate the effect <strong>of</strong> different types <strong>of</strong> mulching<br />
on growth and productivity <strong>of</strong> pointed gourd under climate change condition.<br />
Methodology<br />
Present study was designed as per mandate <strong>of</strong> On-Farm Trial in farmer’s field <strong>of</strong> Raninagar II<br />
Block, Murshidabad, West Bengal during consecutive two years 2020-21 and 2021-22 by the<br />
Dhaanyaganga Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Ramakrishna Mission Ashrama, Sargachhi. There<br />
were four treatments including T1: Control (Without mulch), T2: Black Polythene Mulch, T3:<br />
Paddy Straw Mulch, T 4: Water Hyacinth Mulch. The pointed gourd (cv. Kajli) was planted in<br />
1 st fortnight <strong>of</strong> February and grown for 10-11 months. The experiment was laid out in<br />
Randomized Block Design with five replications.<br />
Results<br />
From the pooled data <strong>of</strong> two years, it was clearly noticed that all mulch treatments resulted<br />
significantly better plant growth compared to the control (without mulch). The vine length<br />
and vine girth <strong>of</strong> pointed gourd (at 90 DAS) was maximum when the crop was planted with<br />
black polythene mulch. It was followed by the paddy straw mulch and water hyacinth mulch.<br />
At 90 DAS, the un mulched plots showed a greater diversity <strong>of</strong> weed species than the<br />
mulched plots. The number <strong>of</strong> weed and dry weight <strong>of</strong> weed per m 2 showed significant<br />
differences in the different mulched treatments. Plots mulched with black polythene had the<br />
lowest number <strong>of</strong> invading weed species followed by straw mulch. Black polythene and straw<br />
mulch proved effective for weed suppression than the un mulched treatments which was<br />
traditionally practiced in the area. Weed infestation resulted in 20-25% yield loss. Among the<br />
mulch treatments Black Polythene mulch effectively controlled weeds by cutting down solar<br />
radiation, resulting in etiolated growth and the eventual death <strong>of</strong> weeds under the flim. Ossom<br />
et al. (2001) also observed significant differences in weed control between mulched and un<br />
mulched plots <strong>of</strong> sweet potato.<br />
Results <strong>of</strong> pooled analysis (Table) showed that application <strong>of</strong> black polythene mulch recorded<br />
significantly higher yield (23.87 tonnes/ha) followed by the paddy straw mulching (22.03 t/<br />
ha). When the entire effort and results were transferred in terms <strong>of</strong> economics, it was clearly<br />
280 | Page<br />
Climate resilient agriculture for risk mitigation
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
indicated that among the mulching material, black polythene mulch was found most efficient<br />
with higher yields maximum net return as well benefit: cost ratio. The cost <strong>of</strong> production in<br />
control plot was low on the contrary due to lower productivity net return and benefit: cost<br />
ratio was less (Table). It was also effective in resource conservation through reducing weed<br />
infestation, reducing the evaporation loss thereby enhancing the water use efficiency,<br />
reducing the nutrient loss and maintaining favorable soil micro-climate. These factors<br />
cumulatively triggered growth attributes which in turn showed synergistic effect on the<br />
productivity <strong>of</strong> the pointed gourd. The result is corroborated with the findings <strong>of</strong><br />
Ramakrishna et al 2006.<br />
Effect <strong>of</strong> different mulching treatments on growth attributes, productivity and<br />
economics <strong>of</strong> pointed gourd and weed growth in the field (Pooled <strong>of</strong> two years)<br />
Treatment<br />
Vine<br />
length<br />
(cm)<br />
Vine<br />
girth<br />
(cm)<br />
Number <strong>of</strong><br />
branches<br />
per plant<br />
Nos. <strong>of</strong><br />
weed<br />
per m 2<br />
Dry weight<br />
<strong>of</strong> weed per<br />
m 2 (g)<br />
Fruit<br />
Yield<br />
(t/ha)<br />
Net<br />
return<br />
(Rs./ha)<br />
B:C<br />
ratio<br />
T 1 193 2.57 6.40 123.3 40.8 19.47 142180 2.55<br />
T 2 224 3.34 8.13 54.0 12.4 23.87 191640 3.02<br />
T 3: 213 3.23 7.70 84.7 24.67 22.03 177860 2.89<br />
T 4: 204 3.09 7.33 90.3 28.3 21.37 163740 2.76<br />
S.Em (±) 3.03 0.08 0.11 6.32 2.45 0.36 - -<br />
CD at 5% 9.01 0.23 0.32 18.05 7.07 1.11 - -<br />
It may be inferred from the study that all the mulch treatments showed significant<br />
improvement on crop growth and yield components <strong>of</strong> pointed gourd over the traditional or<br />
without mulch treatment It ultimately resulted in a yield increase <strong>of</strong> 22.6 %. The<br />
improvement in yield was higher in black polythene mulch treatment followed by paddy<br />
straw mulch. Thus, it may be recommended that the black polythene mulch is useful for<br />
pointed gourd production system with higher economic return.<br />
References<br />
Lamont, J., 2005. Modifying the microclimate for the production <strong>of</strong> vegetable crops. Hort.<br />
technol. 15, 477-481.<br />
Ossom, E.M., Pace, P.F., Rhykerd, R.L., Rhykerd, C.L. 2001. Effect <strong>of</strong> mulch on weed<br />
infestation, soil temperature, nutrient concentration, and tuber yield in Ipomoea<br />
batatus (L.) Lam. In Papua New Guinea. Trop. Agric. (Trinidad) 78, 144–151.<br />
Ramakrishna, A., Tam, H.M., Wani, S.P., Long, T.D. 2006. Effect <strong>of</strong> mulch on soil<br />
temperature, moisture, weed infestation and yield <strong>of</strong> groundnut in northern Vietnam.<br />
Field Crop Res. 95, 115-125.<br />
Climate resilient agriculture for risk mitigation<br />
281 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
T2a-19P-1231<br />
Demonstration <strong>of</strong> Climate Resilient Practices to Sustain Crop Productivity<br />
in Various Climatic Vulnerability Situations<br />
Dayanand, Rashid Khan, Rajendra Nagar, Raghunandan Khatana<br />
Krishi Vigyan kendra, Abusar-Jhunjhunu<br />
Jhunjhunu district <strong>of</strong> Rajasthan lies between 27° 38′ & 28° 31′ north latitude and 75° 02′ and<br />
76° 06′ east longitude. It has been categorized under transitional plain <strong>of</strong> inland drainage zone<br />
among 10 agro-climatic zones <strong>of</strong> Rajasthan. This zone receives only 300-400 mm average<br />
rainfall annually. A national project “National Interventions on Climate Resilient Agriculture<br />
(NICRA) was sanctioned by ICAR-CRIDA in 2011 at Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Jhunjhunu to<br />
demonstrate suitable climate resilient practices at farmers field to sustain crop productivity in<br />
various climate vulnerability situations.<br />
Village Bharu in Mandawa block <strong>of</strong> Jhunjhunu district was selected by Krishi Vigyan<br />
Kendra, Jhunjhunu in NICRA project. Village Bharu has several climatic vulnerabilities Viz.,<br />
drought, low and erratic rainfall, frost, hot winds, low fertility, saline ground water etc. Krishi<br />
Vigyan kendra, Abusar-Jhunjhunu started demonstration <strong>of</strong> resilient practices to sustain<br />
productivity <strong>of</strong> crops in above vulnerability situations as follows: 1. Natural resource<br />
management: Soils <strong>of</strong> village are low fertile, sandy loam and having high pH. Ground water<br />
in village is saline having high pH and high EC. The resilient practices demonstrated are<br />
growing <strong>of</strong> green manure crop, Application <strong>of</strong> FYM, vermi-composting to maintain soil<br />
fertility, use <strong>of</strong> gypsum to maintain soil pH, 2. Crop demonstration: growing <strong>of</strong> short<br />
duration, high yielding and drought resilient varieties, integrated crop management practices,<br />
integrated insect-pest and disease management practices, use <strong>of</strong> agro-chemicals to mitigate<br />
drought, frost and terminal heat, 3. Livestock: scientific management <strong>of</strong> dairy animals, breed<br />
upgradation, feeding <strong>of</strong> mineral mixture, timely vaccination, feeding <strong>of</strong> azolla and green<br />
fodder round the year, improved shelter to avoid cold and heat stress, 4. Institutional<br />
intervention: establishment <strong>of</strong> Custom Hiring Centre, seed bank fodder bank. Results<br />
revealed that above practices are effective to sustain crop productivity in various climatic<br />
vulnerability situations.<br />
282 | Page<br />
Climate resilient agriculture for risk mitigation
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
T2a-20P-1239<br />
Makhana a Highly Pr<strong>of</strong>itable Venture under Flood Prone Waterlogged<br />
Areas<br />
Hemant Kumar Singh 1 , M.K. Roy 1 , Amrendra Kumar 2 and Anjani Kumar 2<br />
1 Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Kishanganj-813210, Bihar, India<br />
2 Agricultural Technology Application and Research Institute (ATARI), Patna, India<br />
India is the highest makhana producing country and it is also cultivated in Korea, Japan, and<br />
Russia some extent. It is also known as gorgon nuts. It originates from lotus seeds. Foxnut<br />
(Makhana) can be consumed alone as roasted one, desert items and can be combined with<br />
vegetables and prepared as a delicious porridge after popping it like corn. Makhana farming<br />
has the potential to be highly pr<strong>of</strong>itable, and its seeds are referred as a "black diamond." It<br />
has been demonstrated that the net pr<strong>of</strong>it from this aquatic cash crop. Fox nut or gorgon nut<br />
has significantly a larger area than the other cash crops and is being traditionally cultivated in<br />
the Mithila region <strong>of</strong> Bihar. It has been established that makhana is a highly nutritious cuisine<br />
that is also beneficial for daily health. Its pops pose many vitamins, essential minerals,<br />
digestible fibre and fat free organic produce consisting <strong>of</strong> many nutrient elements. For its<br />
successful cultivation requires a temperature range <strong>of</strong> 20 to 35 0 C for proper growth and<br />
development, as well as a relative humidity <strong>of</strong> 50-90 per cent and annual rainfall <strong>of</strong> 1000-<br />
2500 mm. Bihar alone produces more than 85% <strong>of</strong> all makhana produced in India and making<br />
it the nation's top producer. The state Kishanganj is one <strong>of</strong> the top Makhana producers’<br />
districts. Makhana is cultivated either in perennial water bodies having water depth <strong>of</strong> 4-6 ft<br />
or in the field system. Field system: This is a new Makhana cultivation system that the<br />
research institute has standardised. Makhana cultivation is carried out in agriculture fields at a<br />
water depth <strong>of</strong> one foot in the system. The Makhana seedlings are initially grown in a nursery<br />
before being transplanted at the right time into the main field. The transplanting might take<br />
place anywhere from the first week <strong>of</strong> February to the third week <strong>of</strong> April, depending on the<br />
availability <strong>of</strong> the field and nursery. The length <strong>of</strong> the Makhana crop is shortened by this<br />
approach by up to four months. Helping farmers replace traditional cultivation systems with<br />
new methods, as well as providing commensurate subsidies, will result in a complete<br />
overhaul <strong>of</strong> the cultivation system, increasing per hectare yield and thus increasing the<br />
incomes <strong>of</strong> millions. Recently Makhana <strong>of</strong> Bihar received GI tag.<br />
Methodology<br />
The study was carried out by the Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Kishanganj. Demonstrations were<br />
conducted with the selected 06 farmers <strong>of</strong> adopted village covering <strong>of</strong> unproductive and<br />
water logged due to flood area <strong>of</strong> 08 ha under NICRA project during 2021-22. Planting was<br />
done during 3 rd week <strong>of</strong> February. Demonstrations were conducted to study the gap between<br />
Climate resilient agriculture for risk mitigation<br />
283 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
the potential yield <strong>of</strong> Sabour Makhana-1 (33.5 q ha -1 , demonstration yield, technology gap<br />
and technology index in technology dissemination in adopted village under the objective <strong>of</strong><br />
flood vulnerability <strong>of</strong> NICRA programme. The farmers were guided by KVK scientists in<br />
respect <strong>of</strong> package <strong>of</strong> practices to be followed during the crop season. The data on output <strong>of</strong><br />
improved variety was recorded. Technology gap and technology index were calculated using<br />
following formula as suggested by Samui et al. (2000).<br />
Technology gap (kg ha -1 ) = Potential yield - Demonstration yield<br />
Technology Index (%) = Potential yield - Demonstration yield / Potential yield X 100<br />
Results<br />
The results <strong>of</strong> demonstration revealed that average nut yield <strong>of</strong> 27.24 q ha -1 were obtained<br />
during 2021-22. The technological gap (9.2 q ha -1 ) during 2021-22, reflected the farmer’s<br />
cooperation in carrying out such demonstrations. The technology gap observed may be<br />
attributed to variability in soil fertility and climatic conditions. More adoption <strong>of</strong> recent<br />
production technologies with high yielding varieties would subsequently change with timeto-time<br />
brain storming <strong>of</strong> stakeholders. The technology index showed the feasibility <strong>of</strong> the<br />
evolved technology at the selected field <strong>of</strong> village. The lowest values (27.46 %) <strong>of</strong><br />
technology index indicate the more feasibility <strong>of</strong> the technology. The average net return/ha<br />
from the demonstration was Rs. 1,58,150/- and total return Rs.12,65,200/- from demonstrated<br />
land <strong>of</strong> adopted village under NICRA programme.<br />
Conclusion<br />
The result finds out that yield <strong>of</strong> makhana crop could be increased with the intervention <strong>of</strong><br />
newly released variety Sabour Makhana-1 under water logged area due to the effect <strong>of</strong> flood<br />
hence, adopting integrated approach in cultivation <strong>of</strong> makhana will increase the income as<br />
well as the livelihood <strong>of</strong> the farmers.<br />
References<br />
Samui, S.K., Mitra, S., Roy, D.K., Mandal, A.K. and Saha, D. 2000 Evaluation <strong>of</strong> frontline<br />
demonstration on groundnut. J. Ind. Society Costal Agric. Res. 18(2):180-183.<br />
284 | Page<br />
Climate resilient agriculture for risk mitigation
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
T2a-21P-1243<br />
Effect <strong>of</strong> Different Sowing Dates and Nitrogen Levels on the Productivity <strong>of</strong><br />
Wet-Seeded kharif Rice under Post-Flood Situation in Assam<br />
K. S. Teja, K. Kurmi, K. Pathak, J. Goswami and A. Hazarika<br />
Department <strong>of</strong> Agronomy, Assam Agricultural University, Jorhat, Assam, India, 785013<br />
Rice (Oryza sativa L.), the world's important crop, is the primary food source for nearly half<br />
<strong>of</strong> the world's population. The total area under rice cultivation in Assam is 23.60 lakh<br />
hectares with a production <strong>of</strong> 52.60 lakh tonnes and productivity <strong>of</strong> 2,228 kg/ha. The<br />
optimum time <strong>of</strong> transplanting <strong>of</strong> sali or kharif rice under the agro climatic conditions <strong>of</strong><br />
Assam is from the first week <strong>of</strong> July to the middle <strong>of</strong> August with 30-35 days old seedlings <strong>of</strong><br />
long duration varieties. But, in practice, farmers <strong>of</strong> the state cannot complete transplanting<br />
within the optimum period due to many reasons and one <strong>of</strong> them being flood in the low-lying<br />
areas <strong>of</strong> Assam. High intensity <strong>of</strong> rainfall during the peak period <strong>of</strong> transplanting <strong>of</strong>ten<br />
submerges the crop resulting in partial or complete crop damage. These factors demand a<br />
major shift from puddled transplanting to wet direct seeding <strong>of</strong> rice with shorter duration high<br />
yielding photoperiod insensitive stress tolerant varieties in puddled condition. Since rice yield<br />
and quality are not only controlled by the method <strong>of</strong> establishment but are also largely<br />
influenced by environmental factors (Shimono et al., 2002), which can be manipulated to<br />
optimum level through different management practices <strong>of</strong> which sowing date and nitrogen<br />
fertilization are <strong>of</strong> prime importance. The right sowing date ensures vegetative growth during<br />
a period <strong>of</strong> satisfactory temperature and high levels <strong>of</strong> solar radiation (Farrell et al., 2003).<br />
The absence <strong>of</strong> transplanting shock in wet-seeded rice results in rapid vegetative growth<br />
during the early growth period and this results in N deficiency at the reproductive phase.<br />
Insufficient and inappropriate fertilizer nitrogen management may result in one half to two<br />
thirds <strong>of</strong> the gap between actual and potential yields. Therefore, the experiment was<br />
conducted considering the importance <strong>of</strong> dates <strong>of</strong> sowing and nitrogen management in<br />
delayed sali rice in Assam.<br />
Methodology<br />
A field experiment was conducted in Assam Agricultural University, Jorhat, Assam during<br />
the kharif season <strong>of</strong> 2020 and 2021. The experiment was laid out in split-plot design<br />
comprising twenty treatment combinations with four dates <strong>of</strong> sowing viz., 10 th August, 20 th<br />
August, 30 th August and 9 th September in main plots and five levels <strong>of</strong> nitrogen viz., 40 kg,<br />
60 kg, 80 kg, 100 kg and 120 kg ha -1 in sub plots. The rice variety used as a test crop was<br />
Bina dhan-11. Fertilizer was applied in the form <strong>of</strong> urea, single super phosphate and muriate<br />
<strong>of</strong> potash in both the years. All the data pertaining to the present investigation were<br />
Climate resilient agriculture for risk mitigation<br />
285 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
statistically analysed using Analysis <strong>of</strong> Variance (ANOVA), critical difference (CD) at a 5 %<br />
probability level was calculated only when the F value was significant.<br />
Results<br />
Influence <strong>of</strong> dates <strong>of</strong> sowing and levels <strong>of</strong> nitrogen on yield attributing characters, grain<br />
yield and straw yield<br />
Treatment<br />
A. Dates <strong>of</strong> sowing<br />
Panicles<br />
m -2<br />
Panicle<br />
length<br />
(cm)<br />
Filled<br />
grains<br />
panicle -1<br />
1000 grain<br />
weight (g)<br />
Grain<br />
yield (q ha -<br />
1<br />
)<br />
10 th August 222.60 22.96 98.21 26.47 31.56 37.65<br />
20 th August 217.93 21.96 86.76 26.29 26.18 39.17<br />
30 th August 204.89 21.31 76.63 26.07 20.82 46.46<br />
09 th September 182.68 20.59 56.75 23.90 9.95 52.18<br />
SEm (±) 2.37 0.18 2.55 0.06 0.69 1.46<br />
CD (5%) 8.21 0.63 8.83 0.22 2.39 5.04<br />
B. Levels <strong>of</strong> nitrogen<br />
40 kg/ha 189.20 20.42 73.16 25.34 17.54 37.79<br />
60 kg/ha 198.44 21.42 75.11 25.54 20.24 41.59<br />
80 kg/ha 206.51 21.96 78.87 25.67 22.70 44.68<br />
100 kg/ha 221.99 22.63 87.01 25.92 25.70 45.57<br />
120 kg/ha 218.98 22.11 83.77 25.94 24.47 49.68<br />
SEm (±) 2.54 0.18 1.94 0.07 0.69 1.49<br />
CD (5%) 7.31 0.51 5.59 0.22 1.99 4.29<br />
Interaction (AxB) ** NS NS NS NS NS<br />
** Significant, NS- Non-significant<br />
Straw yield<br />
(q ha -1 )<br />
Among the different dates <strong>of</strong> sowing, 10 th August sowing date recorded the highest number<br />
<strong>of</strong> panicles m -2 , panicle length, total number <strong>of</strong> grains panicle -1 , number <strong>of</strong> filled grains<br />
panicle -1 , 1000 grain weight and grain yield (Table). This might be due to favorable weather<br />
conditions during the critical growth stages like panicle initiation, flowering (growth<br />
attributes) and grain filling periods and also the availability <strong>of</strong> more time for better growth<br />
(Singh et al., 2004) which may lead to the increase in all growth attributes. Whereas as the<br />
sowing was delayed, the straw yield increased significantly with the highest in 9 th September<br />
sown crop. The increase in straw yield with delayed sowing might be due to the unfavourable<br />
weather conditions experienced by the crop which might have restricted the translocation <strong>of</strong><br />
photosynthates from source to sink. Among the nitrogen levels, 100 kg N ha -1 recorded<br />
highest growth attributes and grain yield but was statistically at par with 120 kg N ha -1 . The<br />
highest 1000 grain weight and straw yield were recorded in 120 kg N ha -1 (Table).<br />
286 | Page<br />
Climate resilient agriculture for risk mitigation
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Conclusion<br />
From the present investigation it has been clearly evident that the crop sown on 10 th August<br />
and fertilized with 100 kg N ha -1 was found to be beneficial under post-flood situation in<br />
Assam.<br />
References<br />
Shimono, H., Hasegawa, T., and Iwama, K. 2002. Response <strong>of</strong> growth and grain yield in<br />
paddy rice to cool water at different growth stages. Field Crops Res. 73, (3): 67-79.<br />
Farrell, T. C., Fox R. L., Williams, Fukai, S. and Lewin, L.G. 2003. Avoiding low<br />
temperature damage in Australia’s rice industry with photoperiod sensitive cultivars.<br />
Proceedings <strong>of</strong> the 11 th Australian Agronomy Conference, 2-6 Feb. Geelong, Victoria,<br />
Australia: Deakin.<br />
Singh, T., Shivay, Y.S. and Singh, S. 2004. Effect <strong>of</strong> date <strong>of</strong> transplanting and nitrogen on<br />
productivity and nitrogen use indices in hybrid and non-hybrid aromatic rice. Acta<br />
Agron. Hung. 52, (3): 245-252.<br />
T2a-22P-1248<br />
Effect <strong>of</strong> Black Cumin (Nigella sativa) and Garlic (Allium sativum) as<br />
Natural Feed Additive on Growth Performance <strong>of</strong> Kaveri Chicken<br />
G. K. Londhe* and S. S. Shinde<br />
Vasantrao Naik Marathwada Krishi Vidyapeeth, Parbhani 431402<br />
* glondhe71@gmail.com<br />
Poultry is one <strong>of</strong> fastest growing segments <strong>of</strong> agriculture sector in India. Feed additive are<br />
important materials that can improve the efficiency <strong>of</strong> feed utilization, animal performance<br />
and enhance immune response. At present numbers <strong>of</strong> feed additives are used to feed broiler<br />
birds for the purpose <strong>of</strong> increase in body weight gain and improve feed efficiency (FCR).<br />
However, availability <strong>of</strong> quality feed at the reasonable cost is a key to successful poultry<br />
operation (Basak et al. 2002). Black cumin seed (Nigella sativa) is called as black seed, kala<br />
jira or kalongiis an annual herbaceous flowering <strong>of</strong> Ranunculaceae family and native to<br />
southwest Asia. The seed <strong>of</strong> black cumin has been used for centuries in the Middle East,<br />
Northern Africa, Far East and Asia for the treatment <strong>of</strong> asthma and as an antitumor agent.<br />
Black cumin seed have been used in traditional medicine as diuretic and antihypertensive,<br />
digestive and appetite stimulant; also have antibacterial, antioxidant, antidibetic, anticancer,<br />
antiparasitic, analgesic, renal protective and anti-inflammatory properties due to presence <strong>of</strong><br />
pharmacologically active compound like thymoquinone, dithymoquinone thymohydroquinone<br />
and thymol (Guler et al., 2006). Garlic (Allium sativum) which belongs to the family<br />
Climate resilient agriculture for risk mitigation<br />
287 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Alliaceae and the genus Allium is widely distributed and used in all over the world as a spice<br />
and herbal remedy for the prevention and treatment <strong>of</strong> variety <strong>of</strong> diseases (Javandel et al.,<br />
2008). The key active ingredients in garlic is a powerful plant chemical called allicin which<br />
rapidly decomposes to several volatile oregano-sulphur compounds and it also contains<br />
organic sulphurous compounds such as allin, ajoene, ally propyl disulfide, dially trisulfide<br />
(Mansoub,2011). Moreover, garlic is very rich in aromatic oils, which enhances digestion and<br />
positively influenced respiratory system being inhaled into air sacs and lungs <strong>of</strong> bird.<br />
Therefore, present investigation was planned to study the effect <strong>of</strong> black cumin and garlic as<br />
a natural feed additive on growth performance <strong>of</strong> Kaveri chicken with the following<br />
objectives<br />
Methodology<br />
The Black cumin seed was mixed in basal diet as per treatments. Garlic was manually descaled<br />
and crushed with the help <strong>of</strong> grinder and subjected for hot air oven drying process at 50 0 C for 8<br />
hours. Ccommercial pre-starter, starter and finisher was procured from local market. Total three<br />
trials were conducted and every trial was conducted on 200-day old Kaveri chicks; obtained from<br />
local hatchery. On arrival, the chicks were weighted individually and randomly divided into five<br />
treatments with four replications and each replication has ten birds. Electric brooder was used to<br />
provide sufficient heat and light for first week <strong>of</strong> age.<br />
Birds were reared on deep litter system using dry paddy husk in a well-ventilated house. A<br />
weighed quantity <strong>of</strong> feed was <strong>of</strong>fered ad-libitum to the experimental birds distributed in each<br />
treatment throughout day along with Fresh, clean, cool, potable drinking water. drinkers, feeders,<br />
and other equipment were cleaned and disinfected with 0.02% KMno4 solution every day. Lime<br />
was applied on side walls and floor with the aim to reduce the infestation before each trial. The<br />
treatments were T1- Basal diet (Control); T2- Basal diet + Antibiotic (BMD @ 250g/Tonne <strong>of</strong><br />
feed); T 3- Basal diet + 1% Black cumin seed; T 4- Basal diet + 1% Garlic mash; T 5- Basal diet +<br />
0.5% Black cumin seed + 0.5% Garlic mash.<br />
Gain in body weight (g) per bird and feed conversion ratios <strong>of</strong> experimental birds<br />
(Pooled from trial I, II and III)<br />
Treatments Gain in body weight (g) per bird Feed conversion ratios<br />
T 1 1327.90 e 2.71 a<br />
T 2 1507.30 a 2.56 c<br />
T 3 1407.70 d 2.65 ab<br />
T 4 1426.60 c 2.63 bc<br />
T 5 1468.60 b 2.60 bc<br />
SE± 5.16 0.023<br />
C.D.at 5% 14.29 0.066<br />
(Means bearing different superscripts within a column differ significantly (P
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Results<br />
The total gain in body weight <strong>of</strong> bird among treatment groups T2 was significantly higher<br />
(P
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
T2a-23P-1249<br />
Models <strong>of</strong> Integrated Farming Systems Resilient to Soil Erosion in a<br />
Changing Climate in Mountain Agriculture<br />
B.U. Choudhury, V. K. Mishra, T. Ramesh, and A. Balusamy<br />
ICAR Research Complex for NEH Region, Umiam, Meghalaya-793 103<br />
Land degradation due to soil erosion (SE) in the tropical mountain ecosystem is a serious<br />
environmental issue affecting agronomic development and ecosystem functions (Lobo &<br />
Bonilla, 2019; Pijl et al., 2020). In the eastern Himalayan India (EHI), more than two-fifths <strong>of</strong><br />
the 26.2 million ha are subject to soil erosion and increased rainfall intensity in a changing<br />
climate exacerbates the threat to agricultural production. The main reason is large-scale<br />
deforestation, burning <strong>of</strong> vegetation, the expansion <strong>of</strong> shifting and sedentary agriculture along<br />
the steep slopes <strong>of</strong> the highlands, and abandonment <strong>of</strong> cropland. Such a shift from forest to<br />
traditional agriculture in sloping uplands has led to an estimated annual soil loss <strong>of</strong> 229.5 t ha -<br />
1<br />
(Choudhury et al., 2022). Cultivated uplands (sedentary and shifting agriculture) in the<br />
region cover only 1.0 M ha (only 4.04% GA) (Choudhury et al., 2021) and additional<br />
horizontal expansion without degradation <strong>of</strong> virgin forests is next to impossible. It is an<br />
ecological and economic compulsion for the region to diversify the agricultural production<br />
system, involving multiple complementary farming enterprises in the form <strong>of</strong> an integrated<br />
farming system (IFS) mode. Given this need, micro-watershed scale IFS models were<br />
introduced into the region's mountain ecosystem in the 1980s. To identify more resilient IFSs<br />
and design adaptation strategies in the context <strong>of</strong> soil erosion sensitivity to climate<br />
change, we evaluated the response <strong>of</strong> such hilly micro-watershed (HMW) based six IFS<br />
models, using field and simulation approaches (as per the Water Erosion Prediction Project,<br />
WEPP).<br />
Methodology<br />
Six micro-watershed based (HMW) IFS models were developed on a forested hill slope<br />
(32.0-53.18%) <strong>of</strong> the ICAR research complex for the NEH area, Umiam, Meghalaya.<br />
These were forestry (HMW 1), abandoned shifting cultivation (HMW 2), livestock with fodder<br />
crops (HMW3), agr<strong>of</strong>orestry (HMW4), agri-horti-silvi-pastoral (HMW5), and horticulture<br />
(HMW 6). Different soil water conservation measures (SWCMs) such as contouring,<br />
terracing, grassed waterways, and vegetative barriers were adopted in all except HMW 1. All<br />
these HMWs were gauged at the outlet to measure run<strong>of</strong>f and soil loss for 24 years. The<br />
WEPP model was calibrated and validated with measured run<strong>of</strong>f and soil loss data for each <strong>of</strong><br />
the six IFSs. Simulations on soil erosion were carried out for the baseline period (1976–2005)<br />
and three future time slices, i.e., early (2020s), mid (2050s), and end-century (2080s) under<br />
four RCPs, i.e., RCP2.6, RCP4.5, RCP6.0, and RCP8.5. The relative percent change in run<strong>of</strong>f<br />
290 | Page<br />
Climate resilient agriculture for risk mitigation
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
and soil loss over the future periods was estimated using the respective baseline values.<br />
Plausible adaptation strategies were simulated in two categories: (i) residue<br />
addition/mulching (organic and inorganic) and (ii) sub-surface drainage system (plastic pipes<br />
and clay tile at 0.61 m deep) on cultivated HMWs, i.e., HMW3 to HMW6. The residue<br />
considered to be locally available dry beans, field beans, soybeans, maize, broom grasses, and<br />
stone mulch in the inter-cropped area.<br />
Results<br />
Measured soil erosion revealed that forests (HMW 1) had a mean (<strong>of</strong> 24 years) annual run<strong>of</strong>f<br />
loss <strong>of</strong> 405.5 (±113) mm, while soil loss was 11.0 (±2.4) Mg ha -1 yr -1 . In the cultivated<br />
HMWs (HMW4, 5 & 6), adoption <strong>of</strong> soil water conservation measures (SWCMs) reduced the<br />
run<strong>of</strong>f by 13.0% – 17.1% and soil loss by 12.6%–15.1% over HMW 1. However, in shifting<br />
cultivation (HMW7), run<strong>of</strong>f increased by 50.6%–87.6%, while soil loss was 50.3%–59.8%<br />
higher over the forest. The average annual run<strong>of</strong>f calibrated and validated by the<br />
WEPP model was comparable to the measured run<strong>of</strong>f and the differences were negligible (p<br />
< 0.05). The normalized RMSEn was 0.81<br />
during calibration and >0.75 during validation periods for all HMWs, indicating that model<br />
performance could be assessed as "very good".<br />
The projected annual SE (average) for all HMWs increased in all RCPs. The IFS based on<br />
shifting cultivation (HMW2) was the most vulnerable, with the highest percentage increase in<br />
SE (46–235%) compared to the baseline years under RCP 8.5. The cultivated IFSs (HMW3 to<br />
HMW 6) had 47.8–57.0% less run<strong>of</strong>f and 39.2–74.6% less soil loss than HMW 2 under RCP<br />
8.5. Of these, HMW6 followed by HMW4 and HMW5 were more effective in minimizing soil<br />
loss (Table 1). The simulated the effects <strong>of</strong> mulching (both organic and inorganic) in all the<br />
cultivated IFSs (HMW 3 to HMW 6) declined with an increase in the mulch application rate<br />
from 5.0 to 20 t ha -1 . Among organic mulches used, broom grass mulching at an application<br />
rate <strong>of</strong> 20 t ha -1 resulted in a maximum reduction in soil loss <strong>of</strong> 8.7, 9.3, and 11.9 t ha -1 yr -1 in<br />
the years 2020s, 2050s, and 2080s, respectively, compared to non-mulching. However, with a<br />
low residue application <strong>of</strong> 5 t ha -1 , dry bean residues were most effective in controlling soil<br />
erosion. Under stone mulching, simulated soil loss is projected to decrease in the range <strong>of</strong> 7.7<br />
to 13.3 t ha -1 yr -1 when applied @ 20 t ha -1 during 2080s. The adoption <strong>of</strong> underground<br />
drainage systems has demonstrated that the 6-inch diameter plastic pipe installed at a distance<br />
<strong>of</strong> 7 m provides a greater reduction in projected SE than a clay tile <strong>of</strong> the same diameter<br />
installed at a distance <strong>of</strong> 24 meters.<br />
Climate resilient agriculture for risk mitigation<br />
291 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Projected run<strong>of</strong>f and soil losses (% increase over baseline) under low to high<br />
emission climate change scenarios in different IFS based hilly micro-watersheds<br />
(HMWs)<br />
HMWs<br />
4 RCPs<br />
Baseline<br />
Projected annual soil loss<br />
% change (+) w.r.t. baseline<br />
t ha -1 yr -1 2020s 2050s 2080s<br />
Forest (HMW 1) Mean # 15.40 14.5 11.2 28.9<br />
Shifting cultivation (HMW 2) Mean # 39.54 68.4 94.4 150.4<br />
Livestock with fodder (HMW 3) Mean # 33.14 11.5 15.1 61.1<br />
Agr<strong>of</strong>orestry (HMW 4) Mean # 26.66 17.5 20.2 40.4<br />
Agri-horti-silvi-pastoral (HMW 5) Mean # 29.17 21.6 22.1 44.4<br />
Horticulture (HMW 6) Mean # 21.65 15.4 16.8 35.5<br />
#<br />
: Average over 4 RCPs (RCP2.6, RCP4.5, RCP6.0, and RCP8.5).<br />
Conclusion<br />
The results from the measured data suggest that cultivation in IFS mode (especially<br />
Agr<strong>of</strong>orestry and Horticulture) can reduce annual run<strong>of</strong>f and soil loss by over 10-15%<br />
relative to dense forests. This decline is attributable to the stability <strong>of</strong> land use practices and<br />
the adoption <strong>of</strong> SWCMs, specifically the combination <strong>of</strong> terracing, contour Bund, and grass<br />
waterways together than the only contour bunding in the IFS based on forage and livestock<br />
(HMW 3). Soil erosion projected in the CMIP5 climate change projections for four PCRs has<br />
shown an upward trend for future periods (2020, 2050 and 2080). The maximum SE was<br />
estimated in the shifting cultivation-based IFS (HMW 2) while the lowest was in forestry<br />
followed by horticulture and agr<strong>of</strong>orestry. Therefore, it is recommended to promote IFS<br />
models based on horticulture and Agr<strong>of</strong>orestry with SWCMs on steep slopes to control soil<br />
erosion while providing food and nutritional security. Mulching or installing underground<br />
drainage as adaptation strategies may make these cultivated IFS models more climate<br />
resilient.<br />
References<br />
Choudhury, B.U., Ansari, M.A., Chakraborty, M., and Meetei, T.T. 2021. Effect <strong>of</strong> land-use change<br />
along altitudinal gradients on soil micronutrients in the mountain ecosystem <strong>of</strong> Indian (Eastern)<br />
Himalaya. Sci. Rep. 11, 14279.<br />
Choudhury, B. U., Nengzouzam, G., Ansari, M. A., and Islam, A. 2022. Causes and consequences <strong>of</strong><br />
soil erosion in northeastern Himalaya, India. Curr. Sci. 122(7), 1–18.<br />
Lobo, G. P., and Bonilla, C. A., Predicting soil loss and sediment characteristics at the plot and field<br />
scales: Model description and first verifications. Catena. 172, 113–124.<br />
Pijl, A., Lara, E. H., Quarella, E. R., Vogel, T. A., and Tarolli, P., GIS-based soil erosion modelling<br />
under various steep-slope vineyard practices. Catena, 2020, 193, 104604.<br />
292 | Page<br />
Climate resilient agriculture for risk mitigation
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
T2a-24P-1308<br />
Effect <strong>of</strong> Different Planting Dates and Varieties on Growth and Yield <strong>of</strong><br />
Rice (Oryza Sativa) under Irrigated Subtropics <strong>of</strong> J&K UT<br />
Monika Banotra*, Mahender Singh, B.C.Sharma and Charu Sharma<br />
Sher-e-Kashmir University <strong>of</strong> Agricultural Sciences &Technology <strong>of</strong> Jammu,<br />
Chatha, Jammu 180 009 U.T. <strong>of</strong> J&K, India<br />
* monikabanotra6@gmail.com<br />
Rice is one <strong>of</strong> the major crops. Planting time is one <strong>of</strong> the main factors that regulate the<br />
productivity <strong>of</strong> rice. Optimum planting time for a crop is location specific. Earliest planting<br />
<strong>of</strong> rice is preferable because <strong>of</strong> utilization <strong>of</strong> the entire growing season and thereby allowing<br />
greater pr<strong>of</strong>it margin. The most common method <strong>of</strong> planting rice in Jammu and Kashmir UT<br />
is through transplanting nursery which is more time consuming, laborious and is costly.<br />
Therefore, this method can be replaced by direct seeding. Direct seeding <strong>of</strong> rice is a method<br />
in which rice seeds are directly sown in the experimental field instead <strong>of</strong> transplanting<br />
seedlings from the nursery. In direct seeding <strong>of</strong> rice (DSR) rice was sown in unpuddled<br />
conditions in well pulverized soil which is the most reliable option to the farmers for efficient<br />
water saving and is cost and labour effective. Growth and development <strong>of</strong> crops are known to<br />
be influenced by multiple factors and amongst them selection <strong>of</strong> cultivars for a given set <strong>of</strong><br />
environments is one <strong>of</strong> the major aspects besides soil fertility, temperature regimes, solar<br />
radiations, irrigation etc. and play a very important role in exploiting good crop growth and<br />
development. Several varieties <strong>of</strong> different yield potentials, quality and <strong>of</strong> varying maturity<br />
groups <strong>of</strong> different crops developed and released on the basis <strong>of</strong> different agro climatic<br />
conditions are tested for cultivation to assess their performance under varied environmental<br />
situations (Banotra et al., 2021). In this study different planting dates and varieties <strong>of</strong> rice<br />
were studied to assess the growth and yield under irrigated subtropics <strong>of</strong> Jammu and Kashmir<br />
UT.<br />
Methodology<br />
The field experiment was conducted for consecutive three years from kharif 2018-2020 at<br />
Research field <strong>of</strong> Agrometerology section <strong>of</strong> Skuast-Jammu to evaluate the effect <strong>of</strong> different<br />
planting dates and varieties on growth and yield <strong>of</strong> rice (Oryza Sativa) in irrigated<br />
Subtropical conditions <strong>of</strong> J&K. The soil <strong>of</strong> the experimental field was sandy clay loam in<br />
texture, with low in organic C and available nitrogen but medium in available phosphorus<br />
and available potassium with pH 7.31. The experiment was conducted in randomized block<br />
design with three replications. The treatments comprised <strong>of</strong> three planting dates (1 st June, 16 th<br />
June and 1 st July) and three rice varieties ‘Pusa 1121’, ‘Basmati-370’ and ‘SRJ -129’. All the<br />
three varieties were sown by direct seeding on 1 st June, 16 th June and 1 st July during kharif<br />
Climate resilient agriculture for risk mitigation<br />
293 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
2018, kharif 2019 and kharif 2020. Rice varieties were sown at specified row to row distance<br />
<strong>of</strong> 20 cm and plant to plant distance <strong>of</strong> 10 cm. The plot size remains same 4.0 m ×3.6 m for<br />
all the three years. The recommended dose <strong>of</strong> nitrogen (45 kg/ha), phosphorus (30 kg/ha),<br />
potassium (15 kg/ha) were applied for variety ‘Pusa 1121’ where as for variety ‘Basmati-370’<br />
and ‘SRJ -129’ the recommended dose <strong>of</strong> nitrogen (30 kg/ha), phosphorus (20 kg/ha),<br />
potassium (10 kg/ha) in the form <strong>of</strong> Urea, Diammounium phosphate and murate <strong>of</strong> potash<br />
.Full dose <strong>of</strong> Phosphorus and potassium were applied as basal in all the treatments .Half dose<br />
<strong>of</strong> nitrogen was applied as basal dose at the time <strong>of</strong> sowing whereas remaining half nitrogen<br />
was applied in two equal splits at 45 DAS and panicle initiation stage . The plant height and<br />
yield attributes viz., no. <strong>of</strong> tillers/plant, no. <strong>of</strong> grains/panicle and 1000-grain weight (g), grain<br />
yield, straw yield and biological yield were calculated by using standard formula during three<br />
years. The data recorded for various characters were subjected to statistical analysis<br />
according to procedure outlined by Cochran and Cox (1963). All the comparisons were<br />
worked out at 5 per cent level <strong>of</strong> significance during three years.<br />
Results<br />
Result <strong>of</strong> pooled data <strong>of</strong> plant height (cm) <strong>of</strong> rice presented in Table 1 revealed that plant<br />
height at harvest <strong>of</strong> rice was significantly influenced by different sowing dates and different<br />
varieties <strong>of</strong> rice during all the three-growing season by direct seeding. Among the three<br />
planting dates, significantly highest plant height at harvest (136.45 cm) was recorded with<br />
(early sown) 1 st June sowing date whereas significantly lowest plant height at harvest was<br />
recorded with (late sown) 1 st July sowing dates. 16 th June (Mid sown) sowing date was found<br />
significantly different from 1 st June and 1 st July sowing date in plant height (126.91 cm)<br />
during all the three crop growing season. It was might be due to the reason that late sowing<br />
(1 st July) had shorter growing period due to photoperiodic response whereas (1 st June sowing<br />
date had longer growing season which produced taller plants and had lesser dry matter<br />
accumulation as compared to other planting dates. Similar, results were also reported by<br />
Bashir et al., (2010). Among the different rice varieties significantly highest pooled plant<br />
height <strong>of</strong> rice (158.48 cm) at harvest was recorded with variety ‘Basmati-370’ whereas<br />
significantly minimum plant height at harvest was recorded with variety ‘SRJ -129’ whereas<br />
variety ‘Pusa-1121’ was found significantly different from other two varieties in plant height.<br />
This was might be due to reason <strong>of</strong> different genotypes <strong>of</strong> rice varieties which may be<br />
responsible for the difference in growth characters. These results were in line with the<br />
findings <strong>of</strong> Thomas and Lal (2012). Grain yield is the function <strong>of</strong> integrated effect <strong>of</strong> all<br />
individual yield components and interaction between the genetic makeup and plant<br />
environment during the growing period (Banotra et al., 2021). Yield parameters viz. grain<br />
yield and straw yield <strong>of</strong> rice were significantly influenced by different planting dates and rice<br />
varieties. Among the different planting dates significantly highest grain yield (28.42 qha -1 )<br />
and straw yield (76.56 qha -1 ) <strong>of</strong> rice was recorded with 1 st June sowing date whereas<br />
294 | Page<br />
Climate resilient agriculture for risk mitigation
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
significantly lowest grain yield (21.82 qha -1 ) and straw yield (65.89 qha -1 ) <strong>of</strong> rice was<br />
recorded with 1 st July sowing date. Among the different rice varieties, significantly highest<br />
grain yield (29.72 qha -1 ) and lowest straw yield and <strong>of</strong> rice was recorded with variety ‘SRJ-<br />
129’ whereas significantly lowest grain yield (21.08 qha -1 ) and highest straw yield <strong>of</strong> rice<br />
were recorded with variety basmati-370. Variety Pusa-1121 was found significantly different<br />
from other two varieties in yield during three years.<br />
Effect <strong>of</strong> different planting dates and varieties on growth and yield <strong>of</strong> rice (Pooled data<br />
<strong>of</strong> 3 years)<br />
Treatments<br />
Plant height<br />
(cm)<br />
Direct seeding <strong>of</strong> rice / Date <strong>of</strong> Transplanting<br />
Grain Yield<br />
(q ha -1 )<br />
Straw Yield<br />
(qha -1 )<br />
D 1 - 1 st June 136.45 28.42 76.56<br />
D 2 - 16 June 126.91 25.13 71.89<br />
D 3 -1 st July 116.62 21.82 65.89<br />
CD (5%) 1.93 1.40 5.13<br />
Varieties<br />
V 1 - Pusa-1121 116.15 24.57 72.22<br />
V 2 -Basmati-370 158.48 21.08 80.63<br />
V 3 -SRJ-129 105.15 29.72 61.45<br />
CD (5%) 1.93 1.40 5.13<br />
Conclusion<br />
Based on three years study, rice variety when sown on SRJ-129 when sown on 1 st June can<br />
perform better than other planting dates and varieties in irrigated Subtropical conditions in<br />
Union Territory <strong>of</strong> J&K.<br />
References<br />
Bashir, M.S., Akbar, N., Iqbal, A. and Zaman, H. 2010. Effect <strong>of</strong> different sowing Dates on<br />
yield and yield components <strong>of</strong> direct seeded coarse rice (Oryza sativa). Pak. J. Agric. Sci.<br />
47(4), 361-365.<br />
Banotra, M., Sharma, B.C., Samanta, A., Gupta, L. and Kumar, R. 2021.Production and<br />
economics <strong>of</strong> irrigated transplanted basmati rice (Oryza sativa) as influenced by<br />
substitution <strong>of</strong> nutrients through organics in Jammu region <strong>of</strong> India. 66 (3): 295 -299.<br />
Cocharn, G. and Cox, G.M. 1963. Experimental design. Asia Publishing House, Bombay,<br />
India.<br />
Thomas, N., and Lal G ML. 2012. Genetic divergence in rice genotypes under irrigated<br />
conditions. Ann. Pl. and Soil Res. 14 (1): 109-112.<br />
Climate resilient agriculture for risk mitigation<br />
295 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
296 | Page<br />
T2a-25P-1369<br />
Effect <strong>of</strong> in-situ Moisture Conservation Measures and Stress Management Practices on<br />
Growth and Productivity <strong>of</strong> Rainfed Cotton<br />
A. Mohammed Ashraf * , T. Ragavan and S. Naziya Begam<br />
College <strong>of</strong> Agricultural Sciences, SRM Institute <strong>of</strong> Science and Technology, Vendhar Nagar,<br />
Baburayanpettai - 603201, Chengalpattu District, Tamil Nadu, India.<br />
*ashrafbsa09040@gmail.com<br />
The moisture stress during crop growth period is the primary cause for the yield reduction in<br />
cotton. To improve the soil moisture availability, by reducing the evaporation losses and<br />
retaining the moisture in effective rooting zone. The soil application <strong>of</strong> superabsorbent<br />
polymers (SAPs) is found to be the promising methodology in rainfed areas. However, very<br />
limited research work has experimented on this. One <strong>of</strong> such developed product is ‘PUSA<br />
hydrogel’ which is first successful an indigenous semi-synthetic superabsorbent technology<br />
for conserving water and enhancing crop productivity and thereby increases the water use<br />
efficiency (IARI, 2012). To reduce transpiration losses, foliar application <strong>of</strong> nutrient<br />
formulations, growth regulators, antitranspirants etc. <strong>of</strong> cotton are being tried by many<br />
researchers. Keeping all these fact in view, the present study was undertaken to study the<br />
influence <strong>of</strong> different land configuration measures and soil conditioners in moisture<br />
conservation along with stress management techniques in soil moisture retention, growth and<br />
yield performance <strong>of</strong> rainfed cotton.<br />
Methodology<br />
Field experiments were conducted at Regional Research Station, Aruppukottai, Tamil Nadu<br />
Agricultural University, Tamil Nadu during rabi season <strong>of</strong> 2016 and 2017 with the test<br />
variety SVPR-2. The soil <strong>of</strong> the experimental fields was medium deep, well drained vertisol<br />
(Type Chromusterts) in texture. The soil low in available nitrogen, low in available<br />
phosphorus and high available potassium. All package <strong>of</strong> practices were carried out as per<br />
recommendation <strong>of</strong> (CPG, 2012). The field experiment was laid out in split plot design with<br />
three replications. The main plots were allocated with three insitu moisture conservation<br />
measures. viz., Broad Bed and Furrows (BBF) (I 1), Ridges and Furrows (RF) (I 2) and<br />
Compartmental Bunding (CB) (I 3). The subplot comprised <strong>of</strong> stress management practices<br />
viz., Soil application <strong>of</strong> pusa hydrogel @ 5 kg ha -1 (S1), Soil application <strong>of</strong> pusa hydrogel @ 5<br />
kg ha -1 + foliar spray <strong>of</strong> 1% KCl (S 2), Soil application <strong>of</strong> pusa hydrogel @ 5 kg ha -1 + foliar<br />
spray <strong>of</strong> 5% kaolin (S 3), Soil application <strong>of</strong> pusa hydrogel @ 5 kg ha -1 + foliar spray <strong>of</strong><br />
PPFM @ 500 ml ha -1 (S4), Soil application <strong>of</strong> pusa hydrogel @ 5 kg ha -1 + foliar spray <strong>of</strong><br />
salicylic acid 100 ppm (S 5) and control (S 6). The yield attributing characters like number <strong>of</strong><br />
sympodia plant -1 , number <strong>of</strong> bolls plant -1 , boll weight and seed cotton yield were recorded.<br />
Further, rain water use efficiency, water use efficiency and soil moisture content at various<br />
Climate resilient agriculture for risk mitigation
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
depths and economics were also worked out and analyzed. The data obtained were subjected<br />
to statistical analysis and were tested at five percent level <strong>of</strong> significance to interpret the<br />
treatment differences as suggested by (Gomez et al., 1984). The data analysis for the<br />
probability occurrence <strong>of</strong> 30 years rainfall in a standard week showed that there is a<br />
possibility occurrence <strong>of</strong> getting more than 80 per cent <strong>of</strong> consecutive dry spell is laid with<br />
45 th and 50 th standard weeks. So, to avoid stress, foliar spray has given at 45 th and 50 th<br />
standard weeks for the years <strong>of</strong> study 2016 and 2017 based on historical rainfall probability<br />
analysis by Markov chain method to fix foliar spray application during the experimentation<br />
period.<br />
Results<br />
From the present study, it was also found that soil application PUSA hydrogel significantly<br />
improved soil moisture availability than control. Soil application <strong>of</strong> PUSA hydrogel @ 5 kg<br />
/ha recorded significantly higher soil moisture per cent at the depth <strong>of</strong> 0-15, 15-30 and 30-45<br />
cm. This might be due to the fact that the application <strong>of</strong> polymers buffer root zone with water<br />
by reducing the water loss from deep percolation and beneficial to the plant roots to grow and<br />
proliferate into soil pr<strong>of</strong>ile and helps for sustaining crop growth and development.<br />
Application <strong>of</strong> hydrogel improves water retention capacity <strong>of</strong> soils and available water<br />
supplies to the crop. Water absorption by hydrogel was rapid and highest which increased the<br />
moisture retention linearly. Hence, the polymer allows water to infiltrate into the soil beyond<br />
its point <strong>of</strong> application. More soil moisture was retained under soil application <strong>of</strong> PUSA<br />
hydrogel @ 5 kg /ha upto 60 DAS. After that soil moisture content was gradually decreasing,<br />
due to absorption <strong>of</strong> moisture by the crops from hydrogel polymer. The super-absorbent<br />
polymers (SAPs) have special properties because <strong>of</strong> their three-dimensional structure. They<br />
are cross-linked macromolecules with segments <strong>of</strong> hydrophilic groups that can absorb and<br />
retain liquids and the absorbed water and release it slowly. These stored water in the SAPs<br />
are released slowly as required by the crop to improve growth under limited water supply.<br />
Yield is contributed by different yield components and any influence made by extraneous<br />
factor, will alter the yield significantly. In the present study, increased seed cotton yield could<br />
be attributed to better crop growth and yield components due to consistent soil moisture<br />
availability due to combined influence <strong>of</strong> BBF, soil conditioner and foliar application <strong>of</strong><br />
PPFM. The broad bed furrow system significantly influenced the seed cotton yield as<br />
compared to other land configuration. BBF recorded significantly higher seed cotton yield <strong>of</strong><br />
1,246 (2016) and 1,590 kg /ha (2017) which was 23 per cent (2016) and 19 per cent (2017)<br />
higher as compared to compartmental bunding. Increment in seed cotton yield was due to<br />
more soil moisture availability at the root zone which favoured better crop growth. This<br />
coupled with higher stomatal conductance and transpiration rate resulted accumulation <strong>of</strong><br />
more dry matter and yield components and ultimately the seed cotton yield. Higher seed<br />
Climate resilient agriculture for risk mitigation<br />
297 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
cotton yield was realized with complementary alliance <strong>of</strong> insitu moisture conservation<br />
measures with stress management practices in the present study. Significant influence by<br />
stress management practices also recorded with soil application <strong>of</strong> PUSA hydrogel @ 5 kg<br />
/ha + foliar spray <strong>of</strong> PPFM @ 500 ml /ha, which registered higher seed cotton yield.<br />
Effect <strong>of</strong> insitu moisture conservation & stress management practices on sympodial<br />
plant -1 , boll weight (g boll -1 ), bolls plant -1 and seed cotton yield (kg ha -1 ) <strong>of</strong> rainfed cotton<br />
(Pooled data <strong>of</strong> rabi 2016 & rabi 2017)<br />
Treatments<br />
Sympodia<br />
Plant -1<br />
Insitu moisture conservation<br />
Boll<br />
weight<br />
(g boll -1 )<br />
Bolls<br />
Plant -<br />
1<br />
Seed cotton<br />
yield (kg ha -<br />
1<br />
)<br />
Broad bed and furrows 13.0 3.76 18.1 1,590<br />
Ridges and furrows 11.9 3.53 15.8 1,467<br />
Compartmental bunding 10.9 3.36 13.5 1,350<br />
S.Ed 0.2 0.10 0.6 32<br />
CD (P=0.05) 0.5 0.24 1.6 117<br />
Stress management practices<br />
Soil application <strong>of</strong> pusa hydrogel @ 5 kg ha -1 11.3 3.42 13.7 1,376<br />
Soil application <strong>of</strong> pusa hydrogel @ 5 kg ha -1 +<br />
foliar spray <strong>of</strong> 1% KCl<br />
Soil application <strong>of</strong> pusa hydrogel @ 5 kg ha -1 +<br />
foliar spray <strong>of</strong> 5% Kaolin<br />
12.4 3.71 19.0 1,580<br />
12.2 3.50 16.7 1,485<br />
Soil application <strong>of</strong> pusa hydrogel @ 5 kg ha -1 +<br />
foliar spray <strong>of</strong> PPFM @ 500 ml ha -1 13.2 3.85 20.8 1786<br />
Soil application <strong>of</strong> pusa hydrogel @ 5 kg ha -1 +<br />
foliar spray <strong>of</strong> Salicylic acid 100 ppm<br />
12.0 3.48 15.2 1,476<br />
Control 3.31 9.4 1,109<br />
S.Ed 0.3 0.11 0.6 48<br />
CD (P=0.05) 0.6 0.16 1.2 100<br />
Conclusion<br />
Broad bed and furrows combined with foliar application <strong>of</strong> PPFM spray at 500 ml ha -1<br />
resulted in significantly taller plants, higher dry matter production, LAI, yield attributing<br />
characters like number <strong>of</strong> sympodia plant -1 , number <strong>of</strong> bolls plant -1 , boll weight and seed<br />
cotton yield under rainfed areas. The higher values indicate that the moisture conservation<br />
and stress management practices improved growth rate performance leading to higher yield<br />
potential <strong>of</strong> rainfed cotton. Broad bed and furrows combined with soil application <strong>of</strong> pusa<br />
hydrogel @ 5 kg ha -1 + foliar spray <strong>of</strong> PPFM @ 500 ml ha -1 during the stress period was<br />
found to be the best agronomic management practice in order to enhance yield in cotton<br />
under rainfed vertisols.<br />
298 | Page<br />
Climate resilient agriculture for risk mitigation
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
References<br />
CPG. 2012. Crop Production Guide. Coimbatore, India: Tamil Nadu Agricultural University<br />
Gomez, K.A., Gomez, K.A. and Gomez, A.A. 1984. Statistical procedures for agricultural<br />
research: John Wiley & Sons.<br />
IARI. 2012. PUSA Hydrogel: An Indigenous semisynthetic superabsorbent technology for<br />
conserving water and enhancing crop productivity Indian Agricultural Research<br />
Institute, New Delhi, India.<br />
Sivapalan, S. 2001. Effect <strong>of</strong> a polymer on growth and yield <strong>of</strong> soybeans (Glycine max)<br />
grown in a coarse textured soil. Paper presented at the Irrigation 11-12 July, 2001<br />
Regional Conference, Toowoomba, Queensland, Australia.<br />
Yazdani, F., Allahdadi, I. and Akbari, G.A. 2007. Impact <strong>of</strong> superabsorbent polymer on yield<br />
and growth analysis <strong>of</strong> soybean (Glycine max L.) under drought stress condition. Pak. J.<br />
Bio. Sci. 10(23): 4190–4196.<br />
Enhancement in Different Cropping Systems Productivity and<br />
pr<strong>of</strong>iTability under Climate Resilient Agriculture (CRA)<br />
Reeta Singh, Sushil Kumar Singh, Illathur Rajesh Reedy, Rohit Jaiswal<br />
KVK Katihar-854 105, Bihar, India<br />
T2a-26P-1385<br />
The Katihar district is suitable for cultivation <strong>of</strong> jute, makhana, banana, potato, maize, rice,<br />
wheat, oil seeds and vegetables crops in different seasons <strong>of</strong> the year. The productivity<br />
enhancement <strong>of</strong> the field, fiber and horticultural crops with the concept <strong>of</strong> integrated farming<br />
system module is the major arena <strong>of</strong> thrust for development <strong>of</strong> agriculture in the district.<br />
Adopted Villages in Katihar under CRA Program in Korha block-Korha, is a town and tehsil,<br />
in the Katihar District, State-Bihar, India. As per 2011, census, the Korha block has 54527,<br />
households with literacy rate <strong>of</strong> 50%. All the adopted five villages fall on this NH-31<br />
highway that makes it more visible. The major source <strong>of</strong> living is agriculture,<br />
rice/jute/wheat/maize and makhana along with pulses are much cultivated in most <strong>of</strong> the<br />
areas.<br />
Methodology<br />
In Katihar, this program has been implemented in five villages (Musapur, Mahinathpur,<br />
Basgarha, Baharkhal and Sisiya) <strong>of</strong> Korha Block. Climate Resilient Agriculture Program has<br />
been implemented in all the aforesaid five villages <strong>of</strong> Korha block since rabi-2020, three<br />
cropping season has been completed and rabi 2021-22 in progress Since then, total four<br />
Climate resilient agriculture for risk mitigation<br />
299 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
cropping season has been covered as per Climate Resilient Agriculture Program (rabi-2021,<br />
summer- 2021, kharif-2021 & rabi- 2021-2022). In all the selected villages, cropping cycle<br />
has been covered as per crop calendar prepared as per Climate Resilient Agriculture Program<br />
with the help <strong>of</strong> new generation machineries such as zero tillage multi crop-planter, new<br />
turbo happy seeder, raised bed multi crop planter, drum seeder and rice wheat seeder for<br />
timely showing <strong>of</strong> crop, to control weeds and pests (tractor mounted sprayers) have been used<br />
for time saving and cost cutting.<br />
While for timely harvesting and post-harvest management (SMS based harvester, straw<br />
reaper as well as straw baller) is used for harvesting and effective residue management. In<br />
CRA programme, eight cropping systems (Rice-Wheat-Mung bean; Rice-Lentil-Mung bean;<br />
Maize-Wheat-Mung bean; Rice-Chickpea-Mung bean; Rice-Mustard-Mung bean; Pearl<br />
Millet-Wheat-Mung bean; Soybean-Wheat-Mung bean; and Rice-Maize) were demonstrated<br />
at farmers field as well at KVK farm <strong>of</strong> Katihar district relative to that <strong>of</strong> farmers practices<br />
systems are compared and analyzed across the project site.<br />
Results<br />
Results showed that highest productivity was recorded in Rice - Maize- Mung bean<br />
cropping system (160 ha -1 ) followed by Maize – Wheat – Mung bean (121 q ha -1 ), Rice –<br />
Wheat – Mung bean (94 q ha -1 ), Soybean – Wheat – Mung bean (68.5q ha -1 ),Rice – Mustard<br />
– Mung bean (67 q ha -1 ), Pearl Millet – Wheat – Mung bean (63.5 q ha -1 ), Rice – Lentil –<br />
Mung bean ( 63.3 q ha -1 ) and lowest was recoded with Rice – Chickpea – Mung bean ( 63 q<br />
ha -1 ) . However, in case <strong>of</strong> district average productivity for rice – wheat cropping system 56 q<br />
ha -1 , respectively. In case <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>itability, Results showed that highest pr<strong>of</strong>itability recorded<br />
in Rice - Maize- Mung bean cropping system (233800 Rs. ha -1 ) followed by Rice – Wheat –<br />
Mung bean (167100 Rs. ha -1 ), Soybean – Wheat – Mung bean (154650 Rs. ha -1 .), Maize –<br />
Wheat – Mung bean (152800 Rs. ha -1 ), Rice – Lentil – Mung bean (150260 Rs. ha -1 ), Rice –<br />
Chickpea – Mung bean (148700Rs. ha -1 ), Rice – Mustard – Mung bean (144600 Rs. ha -1 ),<br />
and lowest was recoded with Pearl Millet – Wheat – Mung bean (116700 Rs. ha -1 ). Rice -<br />
Maize- Mung bean cropping system with CRA intervention recorded highest productivity<br />
(160 ha -1 ) and pr<strong>of</strong>itability (233800 Rs. ha -1 ). Thus, we can say that CRA intervention is<br />
essential at present changing climate.<br />
300 | Page<br />
Climate resilient agriculture for risk mitigation
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
T2a-27P -1388<br />
Crop Water Requirement and Irrigation Water Management in Changing<br />
Climate for Sugarcane Crop in Baghpat District, U.P.<br />
Gaurav Sharma, Sandeep Chaudhary, Dev Kumar<br />
Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Baghpat, Uttar Pradesh, India, Pin code-250101<br />
Variability in the rainfall pattern over the decade due to human-indulged activities inculcated<br />
several miserable circumstances that have elevated the sequences <strong>of</strong> unpredictable<br />
consequences in terms <strong>of</strong> frequent occurrences <strong>of</strong> extreme weather events such as drought,<br />
storms, flood, heat waves, and increase in water and vector-borne disease issues. Changes in<br />
the climatic parameters viz., maximum and minimum temperature, rainfall, relative humidity,<br />
sunshine hours, wind speed, and the rate <strong>of</strong> evapotranspiration had causes severe implications<br />
in terms <strong>of</strong> inadequate water availability, decreased crop production and its yields. Therefore,<br />
for effectual crop production and to render the impacts and complications posed by climate<br />
variability and human-induced activities efficient irrigation water management is critical. The<br />
crop water requirement (CWR) and irrigation water management strategies had been<br />
formulated as an objective <strong>of</strong> this extended summary for the sugarcane crop for the Baghpat<br />
district, Uttar Pradesh which will helps in rendering the impediment put forwards. In the<br />
above context variability in the rainfall pattern has been evaluated based on seasonal and<br />
annual rainfall, number <strong>of</strong> rainy days, 1-day maximum rainfall whereas crop water<br />
requirement (CWR) and irrigation requirement (IR) has been evaluated using CROPWAT<br />
s<strong>of</strong>tware. The scenario based CWR and IR has been computed for normal year, drought year,<br />
flooded year and average year (35 years) which was evaluated based on departure analysis <strong>of</strong><br />
seasonal rainfall.<br />
Methodology<br />
For climate change detection the expert team on climate change detection indices (ETCCDI)<br />
were evaluated. Based on the indices rainy days are counted as days when daily precipitation<br />
was greater than 2.5mm and 1-day maximum rainfall was computed as the precipitation<br />
observed in a complete year. Crop water requirement is defined as the amount <strong>of</strong> water<br />
needed to compensate the evapotranspiration loss from the cropped field. The crop water<br />
requirement is computed as a multiple <strong>of</strong> crop coefficient value and reference<br />
evapotranspiration. FAO Penman–Monteith method (Abeysiriwardana et al., 2022) has been<br />
used for computing the reference evapotranspiration using CROPWAT s<strong>of</strong>tware (Surendran<br />
et al., 2015). India Meteorological Department (IMD) criterion was used to evaluate drought<br />
year as an area which receives a seasonal rainfall less than 75% <strong>of</strong> its normal (Appa Rao,<br />
1986). The daily gridded rainfall data <strong>of</strong> 35 years (1986-2020) had been used to carry out the<br />
analysis which was downloaded from Indian Meteorological department (IMD), Pune while<br />
Climate resilient agriculture for risk mitigation<br />
301 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
other climatic data was downloaded from NASA (https://power.larc.nasa.gov). Loamy<br />
textured soil is generally prevailing in the region (CGWB, 2014).<br />
Results<br />
Based on the assessment <strong>of</strong> rainfall data it is revealed that the annual rainfall in Baghpat<br />
district varies between minimum <strong>of</strong> 245 mm (1987) to maximum <strong>of</strong> 1488 mm (1997) with an<br />
average <strong>of</strong> 624 mm (1986-2020). The average number <strong>of</strong> rainy days varies between minimum<br />
<strong>of</strong> 24 days (1997) to maximum <strong>of</strong> 56 days (1996) with an average <strong>of</strong> 40 days. The average<br />
annual rainfall in Baghpat district showed a decreasing trend thus depicting quite a critical<br />
condition from the cropping pattern point <strong>of</strong> view. The 1-day maximum rainfall over the<br />
region showed a decreasing trend and the 1-d maximum rainfall varies between minimum <strong>of</strong><br />
27 mm (1987) to maximum <strong>of</strong> 273 mm (1994) with an average <strong>of</strong> 74 mm. The indicatorbased<br />
analysis unveils the ill-effects <strong>of</strong> climate change over the region which calls for<br />
adaptation <strong>of</strong> suitable approaches to cope and to render the impacts thus generated. Based on<br />
the departure analysis <strong>of</strong> annual rainfall the drought year (50%) had been identified. Year viz., 1987, 1997, and 2014 had been identified<br />
as drought year, 1999 as normal year and 1994 as flooded year. For depicting the average<br />
CWR and IR, the average <strong>of</strong> 35 years (1986-2020) has been used for comparison with the<br />
years identified based on departure analysis <strong>of</strong> annual rainfall.<br />
As per ICAR-SBI, Coimbatore, there are four crop growth phases in sugarcane crop viz.,<br />
germination phase (1-35 day), tillering phase (36-100 day), grand growth phase (101-270<br />
day), and maturity phase (271 up to harvest) which require irrigation water at the interval <strong>of</strong><br />
7, 10, 7 & 15-days intervals in different phased respectively with the irrigation frequency <strong>of</strong><br />
41. Therefore, the cumulative crop water requirement and irrigation water requirement as per<br />
the computation using CROPWAT s<strong>of</strong>tware for sugarcane crop was 2442 mm and 1965 mm<br />
respectively. The irrigation water requirement for drought, normal, flooded years is depicted<br />
in table 1 and Figure 2 showed the variability in the irrigation water requirement (mm/yr).<br />
Irrigation water requirement for sugarcane crop<br />
Year Irr. Req. (mm/yr)<br />
1987 (D*) 2232.9<br />
1997 (D) 2159<br />
2014 (D) 2084.8<br />
1999 (N) 2012.9<br />
1994(FL) 1953.2<br />
Average 1965.1<br />
Note: * D= drought year, N= normal year, FL= flooded year, average (1986-2020) year<br />
302 | Page<br />
Climate resilient agriculture for risk mitigation
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Crop water requirement for sugarcane<br />
Based on evaluation it was evidenced that the crop water requirement and irrigation<br />
requirement was maximum during the April to June period and is minimum during the winter<br />
season. The irrigation water requirement in the region varies between minimum <strong>of</strong> 1953 mm<br />
(flooded year) to maximum <strong>of</strong> 2232 mm (drought year). To cope with the changing<br />
environment and for efficient water management, irrigation intervals need to be subjugated as<br />
per the moisture content <strong>of</strong> the soil. Suitable irrigation and water carrying infrastructure need<br />
to be develop for efficient water management.<br />
Conclusion<br />
The changing environment put forwards unprecedented circumstances in terms <strong>of</strong> variability<br />
in the rainfall pattern and other meteorological parameter thus causes severe implication in<br />
terms <strong>of</strong> food security. Therefore, efficient and effective water management strategies need to<br />
be adopted especially in Baghpat district where water guzzling crop viz., sugarcane and rice<br />
are grown as major crop during kharif and wheat as Rabi crop. Cropping pattern need to be<br />
adopted as per the water availability in the region that will helps in rendering the impact <strong>of</strong><br />
such devastating condition put forth by the changing climate.<br />
References<br />
Bloom, S., Silva, A., Dee, D., Bosilovich, M., Chern, J. D., Pawson, S., Schubert, S.,<br />
Sienkiewicz, M., Stajner, I., Tan, W. W. and Wu, M. L. 2005. Documentation and<br />
Validation <strong>of</strong> the Goddard Earth Observing System (GEOS) Data Assimilation System<br />
- Version 4, Technical Report Series on Global Modeling and Data Assimilation,<br />
NASA/TM. 26:140-606.<br />
Appa, Rao. G. 1986. Drought climatology.Jal Vigyan Samiksha, Publication <strong>of</strong> high level<br />
technical committee on hydrology, National Institute <strong>of</strong> Hydrology, Roorkee.<br />
Climate resilient agriculture for risk mitigation<br />
303 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Abeysiriwardana, H. D., Muttil, N., and Rathnayake, U. 2022. A Comparative Study <strong>of</strong><br />
Potential Evapotranspiration Estimation by Three Methods with FAO Penman–Monteith<br />
Method across Sri Lanka. Hydrology. 9(11), 206.<br />
Surendran, U., Sushanth, C. M., Mammen, G., and Joseph, E. J. 2015. Modelling the crop<br />
water requirement using FAO-CROPWAT and assessment <strong>of</strong> water resources for<br />
sustainable water resource management: A case study in Palakkad district <strong>of</strong> humid<br />
tropical Kerala, India. Aquatic Procedia. 4:1211-1219.<br />
T2a-28P-1422<br />
Study <strong>of</strong> Moth Bean (Vigna aconitifolia) as a Multifaceted Climate Resilient Crop<br />
G. Gomadhi, P. Sridhar and M. Sathyasivananthamoorthy<br />
Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Villupuram, Tamil Nadu -604 002, India<br />
Pulses play a vital role in Indian Agriculture. India produces about 25 per cent <strong>of</strong> the world's<br />
pulses, but it eats 30 per cent <strong>of</strong> the world's pulses and buys 14 per cent <strong>of</strong> its pulses needs<br />
from other countries (Sanjay Kumar et al., 2022). India's pulse crop exhibits the productivity<br />
<strong>of</strong> 228 kg ha -1 (Choudhary et al., 2021) which are rich source <strong>of</strong> protein for a majority <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Indian population. Moth bean (Vigna aconitifolia) is the most drought and heat tolerant pulse<br />
crop in Tamil Nadu and is used as a source <strong>of</strong> food, fodder, green manuring and green<br />
pasture. Farmers usually cultivate this moth bean crop under rainfed condition especially<br />
during rabi season immediately after completion <strong>of</strong> northeast monsoon under used in<br />
utilizing residual moisture for germination and further growth fully dependent on residual<br />
moisture and dew. So, it is commonly called as Panipayaru (Pani is a Tamil name for dew) in<br />
Tamil Nadu. Farmers fetching low income from the crop due to cultivation <strong>of</strong> desi varieties<br />
which gave fewer yields. Hence, under NICRA Scheme a front-line demonstration (FLD)<br />
was conducted with high yielding moth bean variety TMV 1 with foliar application <strong>of</strong> TNAU<br />
crop booster (Pulse wonder) to increase the income <strong>of</strong> farmers. The following intervention<br />
was studied in the cropping system and moth been TMV 1seeds are distributed during 21<br />
farmers <strong>of</strong> Thaniyal village under National Innovation in Climate Resilient Agriculture<br />
(NICRA) in the farming system typology is rainfed with animal. The nutritional value <strong>of</strong> the<br />
crop was analyzed by Community Science College and Research Institute, Tamil Nadu<br />
Agricultural University, Madurai and its health benefits are given below.<br />
Nutrition in Moth Bean<br />
Component Nutritional value Health Benefits<br />
Carbohydrates 20.63 g Strong bones<br />
Dietary fiber 5.60 g Enhance immune system<br />
Total lipids (Fat) 0.53 g Reduce stress<br />
304 | Page<br />
Climate resilient agriculture for risk mitigation
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Copper 0.36 g Repairment <strong>of</strong> Muscles<br />
Iron 3.80 g Assist to reduce weight<br />
Zinc 1.64 g Bowel movement<br />
Methodology<br />
The demonstration <strong>of</strong> drought tolerant high yielding moth bean variety TMV 1 as a climate<br />
resilient technology under rainfed farming system typology was carried out by the scientists<br />
<strong>of</strong> Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Villupuram through NICRA scheme during rabi season <strong>of</strong> 2021 at<br />
Thaniyal village <strong>of</strong> Villupuram district in Tamil Nadu with the active participation <strong>of</strong><br />
farmers. The soil <strong>of</strong> the village is sandy loam in texture with a pH <strong>of</strong> 7.54, EC 0.64 dS m -1 ,<br />
low in organic carbon status (0.45%), available nitrogen and medium in phosphorus and<br />
potassium status. Sowing was taken were sown during the month <strong>of</strong> December with a seed<br />
rate <strong>of</strong> 8kg /acre. Each demonstration was conducted in an area <strong>of</strong> 0.4 ha and the same area<br />
adjacent to the demonstration plot was kept as farmer’s practices. The package <strong>of</strong> improved<br />
production technologies included improved variety (TMV 1) and foliar application <strong>of</strong> pulse<br />
wonder (TNAU crop booster) during flowering stage.<br />
Results<br />
Front-line demonstration <strong>of</strong> Moth bean TMV 1 conducted at NICRA village<br />
(2021-2022)<br />
Sl.<br />
No<br />
Name <strong>of</strong> the<br />
farmer<br />
Yield<br />
(Q ha -1 )<br />
Cost <strong>of</strong><br />
Cultivation<br />
(Rs. ha -1 )<br />
Gross Income<br />
(Rs. ha -1 )<br />
Net Income<br />
(Rs. ha -1 )<br />
B:C<br />
Ratio<br />
1 G. Mannakati 7.1 25550 45890 20340 1.8<br />
2 J. Subramiyan, 7.8 26000 50765 24765 2.0<br />
3 A. Selladurai 10.1 27000 65390 38390 2.4<br />
4 V. Perumal 11.6 27500 75140 47640 2.7<br />
5 D. Mohan 9.8 26550 63765 37215 2.4<br />
6 R. Anjalai 12.3 28790 80015 51225 2.8<br />
7 S. Munusami 12.1 28000 78390 50390 2.8<br />
8 G. Vijaya 9.1 26690 58890 32200 2.2<br />
9 K. Dhandapani 12.8 27980 83265 55285 3.0<br />
10 V. Munusami 11.6 28250 75140 46890 2.7<br />
11<br />
M.<br />
Madhialagan<br />
12.3 28700 80015 51315 2.8<br />
12 S. Valli 12.1 28880 78390 49510 2.7<br />
13 M. Sakkrapani 12.6 28790 81640 52850 2.8<br />
14 V. Dhandapani 11.8 27980 76765 48785 2.7<br />
15 A. Varathan 12.6 28990 81640 52650 2.8<br />
16 M. Jayaraman 12.3 28950 80015 51065 2.8<br />
17 N. Krishnan 11.6 28700 75140 46440 2.6<br />
Climate resilient agriculture for risk mitigation<br />
305 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
18 A. Murugan 11.3 27900 73515 45615 2.6<br />
19 C. Albert 11.1 28900 71890 42990 2.5<br />
20 C. Rajasekar 10.3 28800 67015 38215 2.3<br />
21 K. Umapathi 11.6 28400 75140 46740 2.6<br />
Average 11.1 27967 72277 44310 2.6<br />
Conclusion<br />
It was concluded that the yield <strong>of</strong> the Moth bean crop and net income <strong>of</strong> the Moth bean farmers<br />
were increased by the cultivation <strong>of</strong> TMV 1 variety <strong>of</strong> Moth bean along with integrated crop<br />
management practices under rainfed condition. To favor the climate change and dew fall, utilize<br />
crop without any irrigation. The farmers feel the subside <strong>of</strong> complex pest and diseases when<br />
compare to other pulse crops. The farmers were impressed with the performance <strong>of</strong> improved<br />
variety and crop booster which motivated other farmers to adopt the same at large scale and area<br />
extended up to 20 per cent.<br />
References<br />
Choudhary, H.R., Gopichand Singh. and Bhawana Sharma. 2021. Moth bean Cultivation under<br />
Rainfed Conditions <strong>of</strong> Nagaur District <strong>of</strong> Rajasthan. J. Krishi Vigyan. 9 (2): 143-146.<br />
Sanjay Kumar, Prashant Kaushik, Jasbir Singh and Verma, R.C. 2022. Increasing productivity<br />
and pr<strong>of</strong>itability <strong>of</strong> summer moong through frontline demonstration (FLD) in Kaithal<br />
district <strong>of</strong> Haryana. Pharma Innov. J. 11(7)(special): 14-17.<br />
306 | Page<br />
T2a-29P-1435<br />
Dissemination <strong>of</strong> Productivity Enhancement Technologies in Pigeonpea<br />
through Frontline Demonstrations<br />
Debesh Singh*, R.P.S. Tomar and Swati Tomar<br />
NICRA, RVSKVV, KVK, Morena 476001, M.P.<br />
*debeshtomar315@gmail.com<br />
The demonstration was conducted during kharif season 2017-18 and 2018-19 year under<br />
NICRA project at ATTA village, Block - Jaura, District- Morena (MP) where 26<br />
Demonstrations on pigeonpea crop were carried out an area <strong>of</strong> 10.40 ha by the active<br />
participation <strong>of</strong> farmers with the objective to demonstrate the improved technologies in<br />
pigeon pea to exploit production potential. The improved technologies consisted <strong>of</strong> use <strong>of</strong><br />
improved wilt resistant variety, seed treatment with Rhizobium culture, balanced fertilizer<br />
application and integrated pest management. Frontline demonstrations (FLDs) recorded high<br />
yield as compared to farmer’s local practice. The improved technology recorded higher yield<br />
<strong>of</strong> 22.10 q ha -1 compared to 17.20 q ha -1 in farmer’s local practice. In spite <strong>of</strong> increase in<br />
yield, technological gap, extension gap existed. The improved technologies gave higher gross<br />
return, net return higher benefit/cost ratio then farmer’s practices.<br />
Climate resilient agriculture for risk mitigation
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
T2a-30P-1468<br />
Demonstration <strong>of</strong> Fish Seed Rearing in Natural Water Bodies <strong>of</strong> Rainfed Agro-<br />
Ecosystem: A Case <strong>of</strong> a Farmer from Srikakulam, District <strong>of</strong> North Coastal Andhra<br />
Pradesh<br />
Ch. Balakrishna 1* , K. Bhagya Lakshmi 1 , A. Devivaraprasad Reddy 2 , D. Chinnam<br />
Naidu 3 , S. Neelaveni 1 , G. Naveen Kumar 1 , V. Harikumar 1 , B. Suneetha 1 , S. Kiran<br />
Kumar 1 , S. Anusha 1 , B. Mounika 1<br />
1 ICAR- Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Amadavalasa<br />
2 Dr. YSR Horticultural University, Venkataramannagudem, West Godavari District, Andhra<br />
Pradesh, India<br />
3 Agricultural college, Acharya N G Ranga Agricultural University, Naira, Srikakulam District,<br />
Andhra Pradesh, India<br />
* ch.balakrishna@angrau.ac.in<br />
India is endowed with inland freshwater resources, which contribute both livelihood and<br />
nutritional security to the rural community. These natural water bodies are biologically<br />
sensitive and threatened by an array <strong>of</strong> anthropogenic and climatic factors. Uncertainty in<br />
reception and availability <strong>of</strong> the water for fish culture causes inappropriate stocking <strong>of</strong> fish<br />
seed leading to poor fish production. Availability <strong>of</strong> quality fish seed at appropriate times is<br />
the major constraint for the development <strong>of</strong> aquaculture in these natural water bodies <strong>of</strong><br />
Andhra Pradesh. To address this issue, Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Amadalavalasa conducted a<br />
demonstration on captive nursery rearing <strong>of</strong> fish seed in Jagannathanaidu tank, <strong>of</strong> Srikakulam<br />
district <strong>of</strong> north coastal Andhra Pradesh, located at 18 0 48.037’ N, and 83 0 53.729’ E. Three<br />
to five-day-old spawn stage fish seeds <strong>of</strong> Indian Major Carps Catla (Catla catla), Rohu<br />
(Labeo rohita), and Mrigala (Cirrhinus mrigala) were released in a 27 m 3 water spread area<br />
<strong>of</strong> 6X3X1.5 m sized net cage at the rate <strong>of</strong> 1, 50,000 numbers. The culture <strong>of</strong> fish seed was<br />
carried out for 15 days up to the fry stage in net cages. It was observed 32.18 % <strong>of</strong> survival<br />
rate and produced 48270 numbers <strong>of</strong> fry. Through this activity, the farmer could save an<br />
amount <strong>of</strong> Rs.9394 on fish seed purchased from outside. This fry-stage fish seed was in turn<br />
reared in rearing ponds for 1-2 months until fingerling size to stock the grow-out culture tank<br />
immediately after reception <strong>of</strong> water. Based on the above results it is recommended that<br />
nursery rearing <strong>of</strong> fish seed is remunerative, reduces losses during transportation, and assures<br />
the quality <strong>of</strong> fish seed in the required quantity.<br />
Climate resilient agriculture for risk mitigation<br />
307 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
T2a-31P-1469<br />
Studies on the Effect <strong>of</strong> Rice Varieties on Flood Tolerant in Karaikal<br />
District<br />
V. Aravinth and S. Jayasankar<br />
Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Madur, Karaikal District – 609 607.<br />
Flooding is one <strong>of</strong> the most hazardous natural disasters and a major constraint to rice<br />
production throughout the world, which results in huge economic loss. Approximately onefourth<br />
<strong>of</strong> the global rice crops (approximately 40 million hectares) are grown in rainfed<br />
lowland plots that are prone to seasonal flooding. Karaikal District is also flood prone area<br />
and received average rainfall <strong>of</strong> 1200-1300 mm per year. Considering seasonal flooding due<br />
to monsoon rain a Front-Line Demonstration was conducted in Karaikal District during<br />
samba (2020-21 and 2021-22) by Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Madur, Karaikal District with three<br />
varieties <strong>of</strong> Rice varieties Viz., BPT 5204, VGD1 and ADT 54 raised in direct sown method<br />
to find their suitability under flooding condition. Apart from the varieties, seeds were treated<br />
with Bacillus subtilis 10 g per kg <strong>of</strong> seed, soil application <strong>of</strong> Azophos (1 kg per ha) bio<br />
fertilizer along with FYM and supply primary nutrient like NPK as recommended by TNAU<br />
(150:50:50 kg <strong>of</strong> NPK ha -1 ) as basal and topdressing. It was observed that, ADT 54<br />
exhibited higher plant height (165 cm), more number <strong>of</strong> tillers hill -1 (18 Nos.), more number<br />
<strong>of</strong> panicles per hill (13 Nos.), 1000 seed weight (16.3 g) and higher grain yield (5,220 Kg ha -<br />
1<br />
) as compared to BPT 5204 and VGD1. Gross and net returns were Rs. 1,01,032 and 43,548<br />
ha -1 , respectively in ADT 54 rice variety and BCR also high (2.32) as against other two<br />
varieties. Hence, to be safe and to avoid risk, ADT 54 variety is suitable for Karaikal district<br />
as direct sowing.<br />
T2a-32P-1478<br />
Crop Diversification at Agricultural Landscape Level for Climate Change<br />
Adaptation in Rainfed Agroecosystems<br />
G. Ravindra Chary*, V.K. Singh, M.S. Shirahatti, K.A. Gopinath, C.A. Rama Rao,<br />
B.M.K. Raju and K.V.Rao<br />
ICAR-Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, Hyderabad, Telangana 500059, India<br />
* rc.gajjala@icar.gov.in<br />
Rainfed agriculture is practiced in about 50 percent <strong>of</strong> net cropped area. It contributes 44% <strong>of</strong><br />
food grains and supports 40% and 75% human and livestock population respectively. Rainfed<br />
agriculture contributes immensely to country’s food production and economy. Climate<br />
change and climate variability impacts Indian agriculture in general and more pronounced on<br />
rainfed agriculture. Rainfall is likely to decline by 5 to 10% over southern parts <strong>of</strong> India<br />
308 | Page<br />
Climate resilient agriculture for risk mitigation
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
whereas10 to 20% increase is likely over other regions. There is a probable decrease in the<br />
number <strong>of</strong> rainy days over major part <strong>of</strong> the country pointing at likely increase <strong>of</strong> extreme<br />
events. With current gains in the existing rainfed production systems, there is need for more<br />
pr<strong>of</strong>itable land use systems. While evolving strategies for bridging yield gaps, due attention<br />
must be given to regional imbalances in terms <strong>of</strong> natural resources. For yield maximization,<br />
selecting genotypes with wide adaptability, cropping systems and crop diversification and<br />
resilience to climate variability remains a challenge. There is increasing urgency for a<br />
stronger focus on adapting agriculture to future climate change.<br />
Methodology<br />
The experiments on cropping systems were conducted both on-station and on-farm at<br />
network centres <strong>of</strong> All India Co-ordinated Research Project for Dryland Agriculture<br />
(AICRPDA). The results are briefly presented.<br />
Results<br />
Crop diversification in India is generally viewed as a shift from traditionally grown less<br />
remunerative crops to more remunerative crops. Higher pr<strong>of</strong>itability and also the<br />
resilience/stability in production urge for crop diversification, and large number <strong>of</strong> crops are<br />
practiced as intercrops in rainfed lands to reduce the risk factor <strong>of</strong> crop failures due to<br />
drought. Crop diversification is recognized as one <strong>of</strong> the most feasible, cost-effective, and<br />
rational ways <strong>of</strong> developing a resilient agricultural cropping system, particularly in rainfed<br />
agroecosystems. The various strategies for land use diversification for climate change<br />
adaptation (drought mitigation) in rainfed agroecosystems are briefed below.<br />
a. Resilient crops and varieties: Introduction <strong>of</strong> alternate crops and new cultivars <strong>of</strong> rainfed<br />
crops is a strategy aimed at enhancing productivity, and/or building crop resilience to weather<br />
risks, and environmental stresses at the backdrop <strong>of</strong> climate change/variability. It reduces the<br />
risk <strong>of</strong> total crop failure and also provides alternative means <strong>of</strong> generating income, as<br />
different crops will respond to climate scenarios in different ways. Higher yields can be<br />
attained by sowing the suitable crops at the right time and with the right land use conditions.<br />
Beyond the sowing window, choice <strong>of</strong> alternate crops or cultivars depends on the farming<br />
situation, soil, rainfall and cropping pattern in the location and extent <strong>of</strong> delay in the onset <strong>of</strong><br />
monsoon. The network centres <strong>of</strong> AICRPDA, over a period <strong>of</strong> research developed the<br />
following agro-ecology specific risk resilient alternate crops and intercropping systems to<br />
cope with delayed onset <strong>of</strong> monsoon for scaling out in various core rainfed agroclimatic<br />
zones.<br />
b. Alignment <strong>of</strong> agro-ecology specific resilient rainfed cropping systems : Crop<br />
diversification with intercropping systems enhances resource use efficiency, and overall<br />
system productivity and income per unit area to the small holders. Diversification with<br />
Climate resilient agriculture for risk mitigation<br />
309 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
intercropping systems contributes to in achieving food and nutritional security, income<br />
growth, employment generation and sustainable rainfed agriculture. Double cropping system<br />
aims to make optimum use <strong>of</strong> land through permitting the production <strong>of</strong> an extra crop<br />
cultivated in winter/rabi after kharif season. In general, the double cropping becomes<br />
feasible when there is on time onset <strong>of</strong> monsoon rains that helps to successfully establish the<br />
first crop, then persist for an extended period <strong>of</strong> time to allow the planting and maturation <strong>of</strong><br />
the second crop .To develop feasible and sustainable double cropping systems, production<br />
factors such as length <strong>of</strong> growing season, cropping sequence, crop compatibility, biological<br />
complementarity, and planting time must be considered (Ravindra Chary et.al. 2020; 2022).<br />
Agroclimate zone-wise, rainfed cereals, pulses, oilseeds and cotton-based production systems<br />
wise intercropping systems, double cropping systems are suggested.<br />
d. Building resilience at agricultural land scape level: Scientific land use planning in<br />
drought prone regions is one <strong>of</strong> the rational approaches for drought mitigation. Ravindra<br />
Chary et al. (2005) suggested that the delineation <strong>of</strong> Soil Conservation Units (SQUs), Soil<br />
Quality Units (SQUs) and Land Management Units (LMUs) from the detailed soil survey<br />
maps at cadastral level in a microwatershed would help in land resource management. SCUs<br />
and SQUs are merged in GIS environment to delineate land parcels in to homogenous Land<br />
Management Units with farm boundaries. LMUs would be operational zed at farm level for<br />
taking decisions on arable, non-arable and common lands for cropping, agr<strong>of</strong>orstry,<br />
agrohorticulture, etc., and further, for leaving the most fragile land parcels for ecorestoration.<br />
Rainfed land use planning modules should be based on these units for risk minimization,<br />
enhanced land productivity and income, finally for drought pro<strong>of</strong>ing.<br />
Conclusion<br />
Crop diversification action plans need to be developed and implemented in convergence with<br />
various national/state programmes.<br />
a. Crop diversification with alternate crops aligning with agroecology specificity<br />
including fodder and vegetable crops beyond normal sowing windows <strong>of</strong> the rainfed<br />
crops<br />
b. Scaling out Real-time contingency plans as two-pronged approach i.e. preparedness<br />
and real-time response<br />
References<br />
Ravindra Chary, G., Vittal, K.P.R., Ramakrishna, Y.S., Sankar, G.R.M., Arunachalam, M.,<br />
Srijaya, T. and Bhanu, U. 2005. Delineation <strong>of</strong> soil conservation units (SCUs), soil<br />
quality units (SQUs) and land management units (LMUs) for land resource appraisal and<br />
management in rainfed agro-ecosystem <strong>of</strong> India: A conceptual approach. Lead Paper.<br />
310 | Page<br />
Climate resilient agriculture for risk mitigation
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Proceedings <strong>of</strong> the National Seminar on Land Resources Appraisal and Management for<br />
Food Security, Indian Society <strong>of</strong> Soil Survey and Land Use Planning, NBSSLUP,<br />
Nagpur, India, 10-11 April 2005.<br />
Ravindra Chary, G., Gopinath, K.A., Bhaskar, S., Prabhakar, M., Chaudhari, S.K. and<br />
Narsimlu, B. 2020. Resilient Crops and Cropping systems to cope with Weather<br />
aberrations in Rainfed agriculture. AICRPDA. ICAR- CRIDA, Hyderabad-500 059.p.<br />
56.<br />
Ravindra Chary, G., Gopinath, K.A., Singh, V.K., Basant Kandpal, Bhaskar, S., Srinivasa<br />
Rao, Ch. And Chaudhari, S.K. 2022. Improved Agronomic Practices for Rainfed Crops<br />
in India. AICRPDA. ICAR- CRIDA, Hyderabad India. p.336.<br />
Climate resilient agriculture for risk mitigation<br />
T2a-33P-1508<br />
Demonstration <strong>of</strong> Climate Resilient Technologies for Mitigation in the<br />
North East<br />
M. Thoithoi Devi, Bagish Kumar, Olivina Katharpi and Rajesh Kumar<br />
ICAR-Agricultural Technology Application Research Institute, Zone-VI, Guwahati,<br />
Assam, India<br />
Climate change is not the corner stone <strong>of</strong> the natural aberration. It is very much obvious<br />
through abnormal weather conditions. This man-made calamity has negatively impacted<br />
every dimension <strong>of</strong> living. Agriculture <strong>of</strong> the entire country is not the exception from this and<br />
as far as north east region is concerned, due to its geographical position, it has affected it<br />
more. Considering the high vulnerability <strong>of</strong> the region, the ICAR has introduced the different<br />
climate resilient interventions in farmers’ field under Technology Demonstration Component<br />
(TDC) <strong>of</strong> NICRA in the state <strong>of</strong> Assam, Arunachal Pradesh & Sikkim. During 2018-19, in<br />
KVK Dhubri, Assam, an intervention on in-situ soil moisture conservation using straw mulch<br />
in Colocasia was introduced in farmers’ field. The main objective behind this intervention<br />
was to minimize the evaporation loss <strong>of</strong> water from soil and to supress weed growth. It was<br />
found that yield <strong>of</strong> local check was 43.51 q/ha whereas that <strong>of</strong> demonstration was 52.25 q/ha<br />
resulting in 20.09% increase in yield over local check. The other intervention undertaken by<br />
the same KVK was production <strong>of</strong> low cost vermicompost unit and reason behind the<br />
intervention was recycling <strong>of</strong> farm and household waste to convert them to nutrient rich<br />
vermicompost. From an unit <strong>of</strong> 6×3×2.5 cubic ft, net return <strong>of</strong> Rs. 4500.00 was obtained with<br />
B.C ratio <strong>of</strong> 2.5. In KVK Sonitpur, Assam, during 2018-19, paddy straw mulching in ginger<br />
variety Nadia was introduced in farmers’ field. During rabi season, rainfall was very less and<br />
low soil moisture affected the growth and development <strong>of</strong> winter crops. So this intervention<br />
was undertaken to conserve soil moisture as well as to suppress weed growth. Yield <strong>of</strong> local<br />
check and demonstration were 22 q/ha and 43 q/ha respectively. Increase in yield over local<br />
311 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
check was 95.45%. In Tirap, Arunachal Pradesh, the main climatic vulnerability was low soil<br />
moisture status and drought like situation during rabi season. So jalkund, water harvesting<br />
structure were constructed in farmers’ farm for giving supplemental irrigation to rabi crop<br />
namely potato (var. Kufri giridhari). The farmers were able to get an average yield <strong>of</strong> 150.6<br />
q/ha with B.C ratio <strong>of</strong> 2.29. Generally, the farmers <strong>of</strong> Tirap district did not apply any<br />
chemical fertilizers or organic nutrients in their field. So, fertility status or soil health <strong>of</strong> the<br />
district is decreasing year after year. Therefore, to maintain or enhance soil health, an<br />
intervention on preparation <strong>of</strong> vermicompost and its application in French bean (variety Pusa<br />
parvaty) was introduced in farmers’ field during 2018-19. It was observed that yield <strong>of</strong> local<br />
check was 29.2 q/ha whereas that <strong>of</strong> demonstration was 42.8 q/ha. Increase in yield over local<br />
check was 46.58% with B.C ratio 3.63. During 2019-20, in KVK Dhubri, Assam, low cost<br />
vermicomposting unit with raised bed was introduced in farmers’ field. Reason behind the<br />
intervention was to prevent the vermicomposting unit from flood. From a unit <strong>of</strong> 6×3×2.5<br />
cubic ft, net return <strong>of</strong> Rs. 6000.00 with B.C ratio <strong>of</strong> 2.57 was obtained. In KVK East Sikkim,<br />
Sikkim, no till cultivation <strong>of</strong> garden pea in rice fallow was introduced in farmers’ field with<br />
an aim to conserve soil moisture, save time and reduce cost <strong>of</strong> cultivation. Farmers were able<br />
to get an average yield <strong>of</strong> 57 q/ha with B.C ratio <strong>of</strong> 2.40. KVK East Sikkim also introduced<br />
bio mulching in ginger var. Bhaisey for reducing weed growth, moisture conservation and to<br />
get quality produce. Yield <strong>of</strong> local check obtained was 76.9 q/ha whereas yield <strong>of</strong><br />
demonstration was 125.9 q/ha.<br />
T2a-34P-1562<br />
Climate Smart Crop Diversification through Paddy-Pea Cropping System under Raised<br />
Beds in Lowland Rice Fallow<br />
Meghna Sarma, Mokidul Islam, and Elgiva Wanshnong<br />
Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Ri Bhoi, ICAR Research Complex for NEH Region, Umroi Road, Umiam-<br />
793103, Meghalaya, India<br />
Rice fallows occur due to the early withdrawal <strong>of</strong> monsoon rains leading to soil moisture<br />
stress at planting time <strong>of</strong> winter crops, water logging, and excessive moisture during<br />
November/December, lack <strong>of</strong> appropriate varieties <strong>of</strong> winter crops for late planting, and other<br />
socio-economic problems. In India, about 11.7 million hectares remain fallow after the<br />
harvest <strong>of</strong> rice, out <strong>of</strong> the 44.6 million ha <strong>of</strong> total rice area <strong>of</strong> the country. Approximately<br />
82% <strong>of</strong> the rice fallow lands are concentrated in the states <strong>of</strong> Eastern Uttar Pradesh, Bihar,<br />
Chhattisgarh, Jharkhand, Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, West Bengal, and North East India (Layek<br />
et al. 2014). Low productivity, crop diversification, employment, and income are the major<br />
constraints <strong>of</strong> existing production systems <strong>of</strong> the high-rainfall North-Eastern Hill Region <strong>of</strong><br />
India (Das et al. 2014). Crop diversification may enhance pr<strong>of</strong>itability, reduce pests, spread<br />
out labour more uniformly, and reduce risks from aberrant weather by different planting and<br />
312 | Page<br />
Climate resilient agriculture for risk mitigation
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
harvesting times and sources <strong>of</strong> high-value products from new crops (Reddy and Suresh,<br />
2009). The Kyrdem village in Ri-Bhoi district <strong>of</strong> Meghalaya under the subtropical hill agroclimatic<br />
zone is a climatically vulnerable area mostly affected by an acute scarcity <strong>of</strong> water<br />
during rabi season or excess water in the lowland rice ecosystem which leads to rice fallow.<br />
Farmers grow lowland local long-duration paddy from May to August which is ready to<br />
harvest in November- December and remain fallow due to excess water and late harvesting <strong>of</strong><br />
paddy leading to again low cropping intensity. Therefore, KVK Ri-Bhoidemonstrated climate<br />
resilient raised bed temporary land configuration technology with field pea variety Prakash<br />
under NICRA-TDC (Technology Demonstration Component) Project in rice–fallow area in<br />
the adopted village in order to enhance the cropping intensity, system productivity and<br />
pr<strong>of</strong>itability.<br />
Methodology<br />
The climate resilient technology <strong>of</strong> paddy (var. RCM 10) – pea (var. Prakash) cropping<br />
system under temporary land configuration using raised beds in low land rice fallow<br />
demonstrated at 95 farmers’ field covering 15 ha area at NICRA adopted Kyrdem village<br />
located at a latitude <strong>of</strong> 25° 41 ´487ʺ N and longitude92° 04ʹ 308ʺ E at an elevation <strong>of</strong> 864 m<br />
above MSL in Bhoirymbong block in Ri Bhoi district <strong>of</strong> Meghalaya during 2015-18 to<br />
increase the cropping intensity, system productivity, and pr<strong>of</strong>itability. The population in the<br />
village was 1760, with households 220 witha cultivated area <strong>of</strong> 600ha with major crops <strong>of</strong><br />
rice, maize, ginger, turmeric, and vegetables having only streams as the source <strong>of</strong> irrigation.<br />
The climatic vulnerability in the village was high intensity & erratic rainfall, hail storm, cold<br />
wave, frost, and terminal drought. Total Kharif (June -Sept) rainfall received during the<br />
paddy growing season was normal except during 2017 with an excess rainfall deviation <strong>of</strong><br />
25.3 percent. The paddy variety RCM 10 (125 days duration - June-Sept) was sown in the last<br />
week <strong>of</strong> May and transplanted in the first week <strong>of</strong> June. The climate resilient technology<br />
demonstrated to mitigate the soil moisture stress at planting time, water logging, and<br />
excessive moisture in November/December in rice fallow through raised beds <strong>of</strong> size 1m<br />
width and 0.3m height and 5-8 length and sunken spacing <strong>of</strong> 1: 0.5 ratios. The field pea (var.<br />
Prakash) was grown in raised beds in October/November after the harvest <strong>of</strong> paddy in<br />
sequence on raised beds. The soil <strong>of</strong> the demonstrated site was high organic carbon (0.83-<br />
1.15%), low to medium nitrogen (KMnO4– N 243-276 kg/ha) and phosphorus (12.43-14.78<br />
kg/ha Olsen P), medium in potash (189-205.43kg/ha NH4OAC-K) and acidic to slightly<br />
acidic in reaction (pH 4.15-5.58). The system productivity in terms <strong>of</strong> rice equivalent yield<br />
was calculated by converting crop yields into rice equivalent yield (REY) with the physical<br />
output <strong>of</strong> each crop and their price <strong>of</strong> output. Market prices prevailing during the crop season<br />
each year were used for computing maize equivalent yield.<br />
Climate resilient agriculture for risk mitigation<br />
313 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Results<br />
Results revealed that the average paddy yield was enhanced by 91.3 percent from 21.6 to<br />
41.32 q/ha and the seed yield <strong>of</strong> field pea was 11.54 q/ha. The system productivity <strong>of</strong> 52.86<br />
qREY /ha in the paddy-pea cropping system was recorded which might be due to the<br />
introduction <strong>of</strong> HYV <strong>of</strong> paddy and additional yield from field pea under raised beds in rice<br />
fallow. The enhancement <strong>of</strong> net return fetched from Rs.14, 830 to Rs.76476/ ha with a<br />
pr<strong>of</strong>itability ratio <strong>of</strong> 2.44 in the paddy-pea cropping system and increased the cropping<br />
intensity from 100 to 200 percent (Table 2). Islam et al. (2020) and Samant T.K. (2015) also<br />
reported that the inclusion <strong>of</strong> pulses in maize and rice-based crop sequences improved the<br />
system productivity, pr<strong>of</strong>itability, resource use efficiency, and cropping intensity from<br />
monocropping to double cropping.<br />
Performance <strong>of</strong> crop diversification on climate-resilient raised bed technology<br />
Parameters Paddy-fallow Paddy- field pea in<br />
raised beds<br />
Percent<br />
increased<br />
Paddy (var. RCM 10) (q/ha) 21.6 41.32 91.3<br />
Field Pea (var. Prakash) (q/ha) 0 11.54 100<br />
System Productivity(q/ha) 21.6 52.86 145<br />
Net return (Rs/ha) 14830 76476 416<br />
B:C ratio 1.85 2.44 32<br />
Cropping Intensity (%) 100 200 100<br />
Conclusion<br />
The pea planted on the raised beds escaped crop losses due to temporary water logging and<br />
<strong>of</strong>fers significant opportunities for intensification and diversification along with the<br />
utilization <strong>of</strong> paddy fields after harvesting to regenerate soil nutrients through leguminous pea<br />
plants. The successful demonstration <strong>of</strong> climate resilient paddy –pea cropping system in<br />
raised beds was realized by following the principles <strong>of</strong> “learning by doing” and “seeing is<br />
believing” which helped the farmers to grow peas successfully after Kharif paddy instead <strong>of</strong><br />
keeping the rice field fallow during rabi season. The impressive performance <strong>of</strong> the<br />
technology awakened the farmers, farm women, and rural youths <strong>of</strong> the village as well as<br />
neighbouring villages to adopt this resilient technology for the second crop after paddy as it<br />
helps to increase the cropping intensity, fetched higher net income and also better<br />
reconciliation under the climatic stress condition. It was concluded that the existing ricebased<br />
cropping system can effectively be diversified with the inclusion <strong>of</strong> legumes to<br />
diversify rice-based mono-cropping into rice-field pea/pulses cropping system which had<br />
nutrient cycling advantages. Hence, the climate-smart crop diversification in rice fallow<br />
under raised beds enhanced system productivity, pr<strong>of</strong>itability, and cropping intensity<br />
spreading to six neighboring villages covering 125 ha area in Ri Bhoi district <strong>of</strong> Meghalaya.<br />
314 | Page<br />
Climate resilient agriculture for risk mitigation
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
References<br />
Das, A., Patel, D.P., Ramkrushna, G.I., Munda, G.C., Ngachan, S.V., Buragohain, J., Kumar<br />
M. and Naropongla 2014. Crop diversification, crop and energy productivity under<br />
raised and sunken beds: results from a seven-year study in a high rainfall organic<br />
production system. Biol Agri. Horti, 30 (2): 73-87.<br />
Islam, M., Nath, L.K. and Samajdar, T. 2020. Sustainable diversification <strong>of</strong> maize (Zea mays<br />
L.) based cropping systems for productivity, pr<strong>of</strong>itability and resource-use efficiency<br />
in West Garo Hills <strong>of</strong> Meghalaya, India. Legume Res. 43(3): 427-431.<br />
Layek, J., Chowdhury, S., Ramkrushna, G.I, and Das, A. 2014. Evaluation <strong>of</strong> different lentil<br />
cultivars in lowland rice fallow under no-till system for Enhancing Cropping Intensity<br />
and Productivity. Indian J. Hill Farming 27(2):4-9.<br />
Reddy, B.N. and Suresh, G. 2009. Crop diversification with oilseed crops for maximizing<br />
productivity, pr<strong>of</strong>itability and resource conservation. Ind. J. Agron. 54(2): 206-214.<br />
Samant, T.K. 2015. System productivity, pr<strong>of</strong>itability, sustainability and soil health as<br />
influenced by rice-based cropping systems under mid central table land zone <strong>of</strong><br />
odisha. Int. J. Agric. Sci. 7(11):746-749.<br />
T2a-35P-1568<br />
Impact <strong>of</strong> Climatic Variability on Wheat Varieties in NICRA Villages <strong>of</strong><br />
Kullu District <strong>of</strong> Himachal Pradesh<br />
Subhash Kumar*, K. C. Sharma, R. K. Rana, Chandertkanta Vats, Ramesh Lal, Pooja<br />
Kumari and Surender Bansal<br />
Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Bajaura Distt. Kullu (H.P.), CSK Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya,<br />
Palampur-175 125, India<br />
*subhashsoils@gmail.com<br />
The performance <strong>of</strong> wheat is heavily influenced by a variety <strong>of</strong> environmental factors and the<br />
most important <strong>of</strong> which is rainfall, which has a significant impact on its growth and<br />
development. The occurrence <strong>of</strong> erratic rainfalls, with a delay in the arrival <strong>of</strong> rains during<br />
the growing season, is among one the factors affecting the crop's performance and yields.<br />
Water stress causes morphological and biochemical changes in plants, which eventually lead<br />
to functional impairment and the loss <strong>of</strong> plant parts (Naeem et al., 2015). The large threat <strong>of</strong><br />
climate change upcoming on agriculture, emphasizes conserving resources for sustained<br />
production which may be environmentally friendly. Development and dissemination <strong>of</strong><br />
short-duration varieties, which can withstand the climatic irregularities predictable in the<br />
future, should be given priority in the mountain region (Hussain and Mudasser, 2007).<br />
Climate resilient agriculture for risk mitigation<br />
315 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Keeping in view the conditions above, Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Kullu at Bajaura (HP)<br />
demonstrated the short-duration and drought-resistant varieties intending to mitigate the<br />
impact <strong>of</strong> climatic aberrations.<br />
Methodology<br />
Krishi Vigyan Kendra Kullu laid 362 No. <strong>of</strong> frontline demonstrations (FLDs) on wheat in the<br />
NICRA villages viz. Choyal and Gadouri. These villages are located at 31°50’40” to 57°0’0”<br />
N latitude and 77° 05’20” to 77°10’40” E longitude at an elevation <strong>of</strong> 1,100-1,234 m a.m.s.l.<br />
The study involved the incorporation <strong>of</strong> the complete Improved Package (IP) which includes<br />
short duration and drought-resistant recommended varieties <strong>of</strong> the CSKHPKV Palampur,<br />
recommended fertilizer, and pesticide in comparison to the farmer's practice (FP). These<br />
varieties were tested in the rainfed conditions that prevailed in these villages. Based on data<br />
collected from the FLDs, the results were compiled and inferences were drawn.<br />
Results<br />
The data reflects that with the adoption <strong>of</strong> an improved package (IP) on wheat, the grain yield<br />
was invariably higher (2910 to 3650 kg ha -1 ) over the farmer's practice (FP) that ranges from<br />
2420 to 2840 kg ha -1 from 2015-16 to 2018-19 (Table 1) which may be ascribed to the<br />
adoption <strong>of</strong> recommended agro-technologies during the study period. With the adoption <strong>of</strong> IP<br />
in wheat, the yield levels could be raised by 15.61 to 28.93 % over the FP. The technology<br />
gap recorded ranges from 350 to 1240 kg ha -1 during the years <strong>of</strong> investigation. The highest<br />
technological gap was obtained during rabi 2018-19 in the variety HPW-349 (1240 kg ha -1 )<br />
followed by 1090 kg ha -1 during rabi 2015-16 while the lowest gap was observed during rabi<br />
2018-19 (350 kg ha -1 ). This may be attributed to the lack <strong>of</strong> irrigation facilities and improper<br />
distribution <strong>of</strong> rainfall (Kumar et. al. 2015). The Extension gap ranges from 420 to 810 kg ha -<br />
1<br />
with the maximum during 2018-19 (810 kg ha -1 ) which indicates that there is a strong need<br />
to be aware and motivate the farmers to minimize the extension gap. The technology index<br />
indicates the feasibility <strong>of</strong> the evolved technology in the farmers’ fields under existing agroclimatic<br />
variations which varies from 9.59 to 41.89 %. Lower the value <strong>of</strong> the technology<br />
index and higher the feasibility <strong>of</strong> improved technology (Choudary, 2013).<br />
Yield <strong>of</strong> wheat affected by rainfall and improved practices over farmer's practice<br />
Year Variety Yield (kg/ha) Increase<br />
(%)<br />
2015-16 HPW-<br />
349<br />
HPW-<br />
236<br />
Technology<br />
Gap<br />
(kg ha -1 )<br />
Extension<br />
Gap<br />
(kg ha -1 )<br />
Technology<br />
index<br />
(%)<br />
WUE<br />
(kg ha -1 mm -1 )<br />
IP FP IP FP<br />
3120 2420 28.93 1080 700 34.62 7.38 5.72<br />
2910 2420 20.25 1090 490 37.46 6.88 5.72<br />
2016-17 HPW 3230 2690 20.07 970 540 30.03 7.67 6.39<br />
316 | Page<br />
Climate resilient agriculture for risk mitigation
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
349<br />
HPW<br />
155<br />
HPW<br />
368<br />
2017-18 HPW<br />
349<br />
HPW<br />
368<br />
2018-19 HPW<br />
368<br />
3110 2690 15.61 890 420 28.62 7.39 6.39<br />
3340 2690 24.16 660 650 19.76 7.94 6.39<br />
2960 2540 16.54 1240 420 41.89 14.14 12.13<br />
3100 2540 22.05 900 560 29.03 14.80 12.13<br />
3650 2840 28.52 350 810 9.59 7.22 5.62<br />
Average 3177.50 2603.75 22.02 897.50 574 28.88 9.18 7.56<br />
The total seasonal water use during the crop growth period in wheat varied from 209.4 to<br />
505.5mm (Fig 1) from 2015-16 to 2018-19. Water use efficiency (WUE) varied from 6.88 to<br />
14.80 kg ha -1 mm -1 in the IP and 5.62 to 12.13 kg ha -1 mm -1 in FP (Table 1). IP has greatly<br />
improved the yields that enhanced the WUE <strong>of</strong> wheat as compared to FP plots, though the<br />
crop water use was the same under both conditions (Dhakal, 2021).<br />
Seasonal water use from 2015-16 to 2018-19 in NICRA village<br />
The harvest index was recorded in the range <strong>of</strong> 60.78 to 62.26 % with the highest recorded<br />
during 2018-19. The application <strong>of</strong> the IP also improved the additional net returns over the<br />
FP which was observed in the range <strong>of</strong> Rs. 3420/- to Rs. 8250/-. The IBCR was obtained in<br />
the range <strong>of</strong> 1.19 to 2.70 from 2015-16 to 2018-19 with IP over the FP.<br />
Conclusion<br />
IP enhanced the yields and water use efficiency <strong>of</strong> wheat as compared to FP. The locationspecific<br />
crop management is required to bridge the technological gap. Awareness and<br />
motivation among farmers to adoption <strong>of</strong> improved agricultural production technologies will<br />
result in better yields which will enhance the WUE in wheat with the same amount <strong>of</strong><br />
seasonal water use in both IP and FP. IP can also greatly improve the livelihood and<br />
pr<strong>of</strong>itability <strong>of</strong> the farming community <strong>of</strong> the NICRA villages <strong>of</strong> Kullu district.<br />
Climate resilient agriculture for risk mitigation<br />
317 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
References<br />
Choudhary, A.K. 2013. Technological and extension yield gaps in oilseeds in Mandi district<br />
<strong>of</strong> Himachal Pradesh. Ind. J. Soil conserve. 41(1): 88-97.<br />
Dhakal, A. 2021. Effect <strong>of</strong> drought stress and management in wheat – A Review. Food and<br />
Agribus. Manag. (FABM). 2(2): 62-66.<br />
Hussain, S.S. and Mudasser, M. 2007. Prospects for wheat production under changing<br />
climate in mountain areas <strong>of</strong> Pakistan – An econometric analysis. Agric. Sys. 94(2):<br />
494– 501.<br />
Kumar, S., Choubey, A.K. and Singh, R. 2015. Analysis <strong>of</strong> yield gaps in black gram (Vigna<br />
mungo) in district Bilaspur <strong>of</strong> Himachal Pradesh. Him. J. Agric. Res. 41(1): 49-54<br />
Naeem, M., Ahmad, M., Kamran, M., Shah, M. and Iqbal, M. 2015. Physiological Responses<br />
<strong>of</strong> Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) to Drought Stress. Int. J. Pl. Soil Sci. 6 (1): 1–9.<br />
T2a-36P-1571<br />
Performance <strong>of</strong> Climate Resilient Technology Demonstrations in Kullu<br />
District <strong>of</strong> Himachal Pradesh<br />
R K Rana*, Pooja Kumari, K C Sharma, Chanderkanta Vats Subhash Kumar, Ramesh<br />
Lal & Surender Bansal<br />
CSK Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya,<br />
Krishi Vigyan Kendra Kullu HP 175125<br />
*drrameshrana70@gmail.com/ ranark@hillagric.ac.in<br />
Climate change trends and projections are on a global agenda. To reduce the ill effect <strong>of</strong><br />
climate change, climate resilient agriculture is a sustainable approach for converting and<br />
reorienting agricultural systems through different adaptation and mitigation mechanisms<br />
(Debangshi 2021). Agriculture is extremely vulnerable to climate change and has shown its<br />
sensitivity to variations in different threats like temperature, precipitation, and incidence <strong>of</strong><br />
natural events such as droughts which have impacted farm incomes. The Natural Resource<br />
Management (NRM) module <strong>of</strong> the National Network Project <strong>of</strong> ICAR- National Innovations<br />
on Climate Resilient Agriculture (NICRA) focuses to enhance the resilience <strong>of</strong> agriculture to<br />
climate change and climate vulnerability. The Technology Demonstration Component (TDC)<br />
<strong>of</strong> NICRA <strong>of</strong>fers a great opportunity to work with farmers and apply such technologies under<br />
field conditions to address current climate variability. The objective was to demonstrate sitespecific<br />
technology interventions on farmer’s fields for coping with climate variability in the<br />
district<br />
318 | Page<br />
Climate resilient agriculture for risk mitigation
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Methodology<br />
To address the climate vulnerabilities <strong>of</strong> the district, KVK Kullu selected one representative<br />
village for project implementation. Chhoel Gadauri village <strong>of</strong> Kullu block <strong>of</strong> the district<br />
Kullu was identified for technology demonstration under NICRA project based on the impact<br />
<strong>of</strong> climate change on agriculture in the village. A baseline was established, constraints were<br />
flagged and an action plan was prepared in consultation with the farmers and the innovative<br />
village climate risk management committee (VCRMC) created in the project to enable<br />
participatory decision-making and empowerment. Climatic variability in terms <strong>of</strong> historical<br />
rainfall trends over the last few decades was worked out which indicates that dry spells <strong>of</strong> 10-<br />
20 days are increasing particularly during Kharif season. Erratic rainfall, drought, and an<br />
increase in the temperature were the main constraints in the village. Therefore, to mitigate the<br />
drought to some extent, KVK decided to implement rainwater harvesting for life-saving<br />
irrigation. Water from perennial sources was brought from about 1.0 km through the span. A<br />
series <strong>of</strong> interlinked water storage tanks were constructed in the village which was later upscaled<br />
with the help <strong>of</strong> developmental departments. Warmer winter in lower elevations has<br />
resulted in the shifting <strong>of</strong> apples to higher elevations (Rana et. al. 2016). To counter the<br />
effect <strong>of</strong> climate change, farmers were motivated to plant pomegranates, which requires a hot<br />
and dry climate and are suitable for the changing climate in lower areas <strong>of</strong> the district. The<br />
demonstration on pomegranate cultivation in 15 ha area was conducted in the farmer’s field.<br />
Based on percent deviation in rainfall during the Kharif season the year 2014, 2016, and 2020<br />
were cited as stress years. The data on yield and net returns were averaged for three<br />
consecutive years.<br />
Results<br />
The major interventions under site-specific rainwater harvesting strategies were the<br />
construction <strong>of</strong> water storage tanks for water harvesting and to utilization <strong>of</strong> harvested water<br />
efficiently during the dry spell and critical stages <strong>of</strong> growth in rainfed areas. To reduce the<br />
effect <strong>of</strong> drought, a water storage capacity <strong>of</strong> 20.5 lakhs liter was created by constructing 65<br />
water storage tanks since the inception <strong>of</strong> the NICRA project with the help <strong>of</strong> developmental<br />
departments. The harvested water was utilized for supplementary lifesaving irrigations at<br />
critical stages <strong>of</strong> the crop during dry spells. Demonstrations on diversification towards highvalue<br />
cash crop tomato in Kharif, garlic in rabi season were conducted against cropping<br />
sequence <strong>of</strong> maize- wheat in the rainfed area. In tomato crops 4-5 life-saving irrigations were<br />
given through water-carrying pipes. During the Rabi season in garlic 3-4 numbers <strong>of</strong><br />
lifesaving, irrigations were given through the sprinkler method. The performance during<br />
stress and a normal year <strong>of</strong> rainfall was quite high as compared to the farmer's practice in the<br />
rainfed areas. The average net return for three years (Table 1) was recorded at Rs 3.39<br />
lakhs/ha from tomato and Rs 23993/ha from maize during the Kharif season in the stress<br />
Climate resilient agriculture for risk mitigation<br />
319 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
year. However, during the normal years <strong>of</strong> rainfall, the net income <strong>of</strong> Rs 4.16 lakhs/ha from<br />
tomatoes in rainfed areas and Rs 27605/ha from maize were obtained. Intervention in<br />
supplementary irrigation during the critical stages helped in maintaining the yield during<br />
stressful years. Reduction in yield was only 2.5 % and 4.8% in tomato and maize respectively<br />
during the stress year when compared to the normal year <strong>of</strong> rainfall.<br />
Similarly, in the rabi season, the performance <strong>of</strong> Garlic and wheat during the stress and<br />
normal years <strong>of</strong> rainfall were compiled. The net returns from garlic were compared with the<br />
net income from the wheat during rabi season. It was observed that a net return <strong>of</strong> Rs 2.15<br />
lakhs/ha from garlic and only Rs 49868 /ha from the wheat during rabi season in stress year.<br />
However, in normal years <strong>of</strong> rainfall, the net returns were observed to the tune <strong>of</strong> Rs 2.67<br />
lakhs/ha from garlic and only Rs 52316 /ha from wheat in the rabi season in the normal year<br />
<strong>of</strong> rainfall. The yield reduction was observed at 1.75% and 3% in garlic and wheat<br />
respectively when compared to the normal year <strong>of</strong> rainfall. No irrigation was given in maize<br />
and wheat.<br />
Effect <strong>of</strong> technology demonstration on yield and net income <strong>of</strong> farmers during stress<br />
and normal year <strong>of</strong> rainfall.<br />
Stress/<br />
normal year<br />
Kharif season<br />
Performance<br />
during stress<br />
years<br />
Performance<br />
during<br />
normal years<br />
Rabi Season<br />
Performance<br />
during stress<br />
years<br />
Performance<br />
during<br />
normal years<br />
Intervention<br />
Tomato + Lifesaving<br />
irrigation<br />
Maize- farmer<br />
practice<br />
Tomato + Lifesaving<br />
irrigation<br />
Maize- farmer<br />
practice<br />
Garlic<br />
GHC-1+ life saving<br />
irrigation<br />
Wheat<br />
HPW-368 -farmer<br />
practice<br />
Garlic<br />
GHC-1+ lifesaving<br />
irrigation<br />
Wheat<br />
HPW-368 farmer<br />
practice<br />
Area<br />
(ha)<br />
No. <strong>of</strong><br />
farmers<br />
Avg.<br />
Yield<br />
(q/ha)<br />
Avg.<br />
Fodder<br />
yield<br />
(q/ha)<br />
Gross<br />
returns<br />
(Rs/ha)<br />
Net<br />
returns<br />
(Rs/ha)<br />
B:C<br />
ratio<br />
4.73 27 345.20 - 440633 339301 4.38<br />
28.22 33.08 46350 23993 2.07<br />
4.70 21 354.08 - 531120 416120 4.61<br />
29.65 37.65 50649 27605 2.17<br />
6.4 46 112.85 - 300333 215306 3.52<br />
30.90 37.08 77868 49868 2.78<br />
5.54 43 114.25 - 350875 267535 4.26<br />
31.87 38.25 80316 52316 2.86<br />
320 | Page<br />
Climate resilient agriculture for risk mitigation
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Intervention in pomegranate cultivation was initiated during 2012-13 in the NICRA village as<br />
an alternate cash crop to apple. In the NICRA village, the area under pomegranate was only 5<br />
ha before the start <strong>of</strong> the project as per the baseline survey conducted by the KVK which has<br />
increased to 50 ha in ten years <strong>of</strong> implementation <strong>of</strong> the project. The pomegranate cultivar<br />
Kandhari Kabuli planted during 2012-13 started bearing in the third year <strong>of</strong> plantation.<br />
Conclusion<br />
It may be concluded that that intervention on water harvesting has opened up the opportunity<br />
for cultivating cash crops in rainfed area <strong>of</strong> the village by providing lifesaving irrigation<br />
during dry spells. The income <strong>of</strong> the farmers has been increased to many fold by adopting<br />
cash crops in comparison to cereal based farming. Similarly, intervention on pomegranate<br />
cultivation in the NICRA village has proven highly pr<strong>of</strong>itable.<br />
References<br />
Debangshi, U. 2021. Climate Resilient Agriculture an Approach to Reduce the Ill-Effect <strong>of</strong><br />
Climate Change. Int. J. Recent Adv. Multidisciplinary Topics. 2(7) -309-315.<br />
Rana, R. K., Thakur, S.K., Sharma, K.C., Vats, Chaderkanta, Lal, R., Kapoor, D., Kirna Devi<br />
and Sharma, Deepak. 2016. Impact, adaptation and mitigation <strong>of</strong> climate change on<br />
horticulture in foot hill areas <strong>of</strong> district Kullu (HP). In: Souvenir cum Invited Paper<br />
Abstract <strong>Book</strong>, 7 th Indian Horticulture Congress- An International Meet for Doubling<br />
Farmers Income through Horticulture, ICAR, P-301.<br />
Studies on Effect <strong>of</strong> Weather on Flowering and Yield <strong>of</strong> Mango<br />
T2a-37P-1576<br />
A. P. Mallikarjuna Gowda, R. Krupashree, H. S. Shivaramu, M. N. Thimmegowda,<br />
M. H. Manjunatha and Lingaraj Huggi<br />
University <strong>of</strong> Agricultural Sciences, GKVK, Bangalore-560065<br />
Any crop in a locality will grow and yield more under favourable climate and weather. While<br />
a crop or variety's suitability for a location is determined by the climate, its performance in<br />
that area is determined by the weather. Emphasizing the impact <strong>of</strong> short-term weather<br />
fluctuation on crop performance. For instance, changes in air temperature and rainfall affect<br />
several horticultural crops. Mango is growing well in areas receiving annual rainfall <strong>of</strong> 25 to<br />
250 cm. High humidity, rainfall and frost during the flowering period are harmful to the crop.<br />
Rainfall during flowering adversely affects fruit set, fruit development and yield. Excessive<br />
vegetative growth and flower drop occur due to heavy and prolonged rainfall. Fruits develop<br />
better colour and are less affected by diseases where the air is comparatively dry during<br />
flowering. Time and peak period <strong>of</strong> flowering, sex ratio, flowering behaviour, insect pests,<br />
Climate resilient agriculture for risk mitigation<br />
321 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
diseases and weather parameters like temperature and relative humidity influence flowering<br />
and fruit set in mango. Hence a study was conducted to establish a relationship <strong>of</strong> weather<br />
parameters with the flowering behaviour and yield <strong>of</strong> mango using per cent hermaphrodite<br />
flowers, fruit set (%) and fruit yield <strong>of</strong> mango.<br />
Methodology<br />
The present investigation was executed at 2 locations/orchards with two management levels<br />
(M1: control and M2: With Plant Protection Chemicals) with a sample size <strong>of</strong> 5 plants each in<br />
2 locations with different age groups (20 and 28 years old plantation) located at Dryland<br />
Agriculture Project, Zonal Agricultural research station, UAS, GKVK, Bengaluru analysed<br />
using factorial RCBD for two years (2020-21 and 2021-22). To manage the major diseases<br />
and pests like powdery mildew, anthracnose, fruit fly and mango hoppers two sprays were<br />
given to the spray treatment trees with Hexaconazole @ 5 % SC, Lambda Cyhalothrin @ 5 %<br />
EC and Sulphur @ 80% WP at the time <strong>of</strong> flower bud initiation and fruiting stage.<br />
Observations are recorded from the start <strong>of</strong> vegetative growth, and flowering till the<br />
harvesting <strong>of</strong> fruits.<br />
Results<br />
The per cent hermaphrodite flowers from the number <strong>of</strong> hermaphrodite flowers to the total<br />
number <strong>of</strong> flowers per panicle in each direction in Mallika hybrid was higher in 20 years old<br />
(24.0 %) with spray treatment (24.2 %) in the north direction <strong>of</strong> the tree (24.6 %) (Table 1).<br />
This may be due to the higher proportion <strong>of</strong> hermaphrodite flowers in the 20 years old tree<br />
and male flowers being more than bisexual flowers and along with the flowering behaviour, it<br />
was also affected by the temperature. Both male and hermaphrodite flowers are found within<br />
a single inflorescence. It is the hermaphrodite flowers that <strong>of</strong>ten undergo proper pollination<br />
and fertilization and set fruit. Low temperature during the floral morphogenesis period which<br />
is much before the flower emergence is critical for the proportion <strong>of</strong> hermaphrodite flowers in<br />
mango. Flower bud differentiation in different cultivars and seasons was associated with<br />
higher chlorophyll, carbohydrate and carbohydrate-nitrogen ratio, total phenol, soluble<br />
protein, cytokinin and ethylene, auxin and lower levels <strong>of</strong> IAA oxidase activity and<br />
gibberellic acid (Manjarekar et al., 2018, Rajatiya et al., 2018 and Saheda et al., 2019).<br />
The ability <strong>of</strong> cultivars to bear fruit set also depends upon the availability <strong>of</strong> pollen, its<br />
viability, population <strong>of</strong> pollinating insects and self and cross-compatibility <strong>of</strong> a cultivar,<br />
abortion <strong>of</strong> embryo, low stigmatic receptivity, lack <strong>of</strong> irrigation and competition between<br />
developing fruitlets. Along with these abiotic factors, the incidence <strong>of</strong> powdery mildew,<br />
anthracnose disease, and hoppers can cause flower and fruit drops. The temperature was<br />
found to play a superior role in fruit set, low, as well as high temperatures, affect the fruit set<br />
in mango. Mallika hybrid <strong>of</strong> 20 years <strong>of</strong> aged trees (3.4 %) with a spray <strong>of</strong> plant protection<br />
322 | Page<br />
Climate resilient agriculture for risk mitigation
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
chemicals (3.3 %) in the east direction <strong>of</strong> the tree (3.5 %) has shown a higher fruit set per<br />
cent.<br />
With all the increasing flowering and yield attributes which has contributed to increasing fruit<br />
yield in 20 years <strong>of</strong> aged trees with the plant protection chemicals spray. This is due to an<br />
increase in the per cent hermaphrodite flowers and higher fruit set percentage in these<br />
treatments. The flowering and fruiting depend on the supply <strong>of</strong> photosynthates during flower<br />
bud differentiation, fruit set and fruit development thus, act as a major sink for carbohydrates<br />
(Rattan et al., 2020).<br />
Per cent hermaphrodite flowers per inflorescence, fruit set per cent and yield as<br />
influenced by different ages, management practice and direction in Mallika mango<br />
(Pooled)<br />
20 years (A1) 28 years (A2)<br />
Fruit<br />
Treatment Control<br />
Control<br />
D Mean Treatment yield<br />
PPC (M2)<br />
PPC (M2)<br />
(M1)<br />
(M1)<br />
(kg/tree)<br />
Per cent hermaphrodite flowers<br />
20 years<br />
D 1 - North 24.6 25.4 24.1 24.2 24.6 (A 1)<br />
64.24<br />
D 2 - South 23.3 24.4 23.5 24.0 23.8 28 years<br />
D 3 - East 23.2 23.7 23.6 23.9 23.6 (A 2)<br />
46.60<br />
D 4- West 23.0 24.2 23.7 23.6 23.6 F test *<br />
A - Mean 24.0 23.8 S.Em.+ 2.08<br />
M - Mean 23.6 24.2<br />
A M D<br />
CD at 5% 6.42<br />
F - test NS * * Control<br />
S.Em.+ 0.11 0.11 0.16 (M 1)<br />
46.09<br />
CD at 5% NS 0.32 0.46<br />
AM AD MD AMD<br />
PPC (M 2) 64.75<br />
F - test * NS NS NS<br />
S.Em.+ 0.16 0.23 0.23 0.32<br />
F test *<br />
CD at 5% 0.46 NS NS NS<br />
S.Em.+ 2.08<br />
20 years (A1) 28 years (A2)<br />
Treatment Control<br />
Control<br />
D Mean<br />
PPC (M2)<br />
PPC (M2)<br />
(M1)<br />
(M1)<br />
Fruit set percent<br />
D 1 - North 3.2 3.1 3.2 3.2 3.2<br />
D 2 - South 3.4 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.3<br />
D 3 - East 3.6 3.6 3.4 3.4 3.5<br />
D 4- West 3.6 3.5 3.3 3.4 3.4<br />
A - Mean 3.4 3.3<br />
M - Mean 3.4 3.3<br />
A M D<br />
F - test * NS *<br />
S.Em.+ 0.03 0.03 0.05<br />
CD at 5% 0.09 NS 0.13<br />
AM AD MD AMD<br />
F - test NS NS NS NS<br />
S.Em.+ 0.05 0.07 0.07 0.09<br />
CD at 5% NS NS NS NS<br />
Climate resilient agriculture for risk mitigation<br />
CD at 5% 6.42<br />
A 1M 1 54.13<br />
A1M2 74.34<br />
A2M1 38.04<br />
A2M2 55.17<br />
F test<br />
NS<br />
S.Em.+ 2.94<br />
CD at 5%<br />
NS<br />
323 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
The outcomes <strong>of</strong> the investigation indicated, realizing a higher yield <strong>of</strong> 32.3 – 34.1 o C<br />
temperature, 65.27 per cent relative humidity and 241.9- 319.2 mm <strong>of</strong> rainfall during mango<br />
flowering and fruiting period was found optimum.<br />
References<br />
Manjarekar, R. G., Khanvilkar, M. H., Shirke, G. D., Karle, S. S. And Ahire, P. G., 2018, Effect <strong>of</strong><br />
fertilizer levels on flowering behaviour and yield <strong>of</strong> fruits in mango cv. Alphonso. Int. J.<br />
Curr. Microbiol. App. Sci., 18(6): 508-514.<br />
Rajatiya, J. H., Varu, D. K., Farheen, H. H. And Meera, B. S., 2018, Correlation <strong>of</strong> climatic<br />
parameters with flowering characters <strong>of</strong> Mango. Int. J. Pure App. Biosci., 6(3): 597-601.<br />
Rattan, C. S., Singh, S. K. And Badhan, B. S., 2020, Influence <strong>of</strong> tree age on vegetative growth, leaf<br />
nutrient content and yield <strong>of</strong> Kinnow trees. Plant Arc., 20(2): 5257-5262.<br />
Saheda, M. D., Balahussaini, M., Ramaiah, M. And Balakrishna, M., 2019, Study on Morpho-<br />
Physical Characters <strong>of</strong> Mango Flower Varieties/Hybrids in Kodur Agro-Climatic Conditions.<br />
Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. App., 8(3): 28-38.<br />
T2a-38P-1583<br />
Impact <strong>of</strong> Technology Demonstration through NICRA-Interventions in<br />
Bhagalpur District <strong>of</strong> Bihar<br />
Arvind Kumar Sinha 1 , Sailabala Dei 2 , M.Z. Hoda 1 and A.K. Maurya 1<br />
1 Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Bhagalpur, 2 , Bihar Agricultural University, Sabour, Bhagalpur<br />
ddrbausabour@gmail.com<br />
National Innovations on Climate Resilient Agriculture (NICRA) is a network project <strong>of</strong> the Indian<br />
Council <strong>of</strong> Agricultural Research (ICAR) launched in February 2011. The project aims to enhance the<br />
resilience <strong>of</strong> Indian agriculture to climate change and climate vulnerability through strategic research<br />
and technology demonstration. The research on adaptation and mitigation covers crops, livestock,<br />
fisheries, and natural resource management. The project consists <strong>of</strong> four components viz. Strategic<br />
Research, Technology Demonstration, Capacity Building and Sponsored/Competitive Grants. Climate<br />
change has become an important area <strong>of</strong> concern for India to ensure food and nutritional security for<br />
the growing population. The impacts <strong>of</strong> climate change are global, but countries like India are more<br />
vulnerable because <strong>of</strong> the high population depending on agriculture. In India, significant negative<br />
impacts have been implied with medium-term (2010-2039) climate change, predicted to reduce yields<br />
by 4.5 to 9 percent, depending on the magnitude and distribution <strong>of</strong> warming. Since agriculture makes<br />
up roughly 16 percent <strong>of</strong> India’s GDP, a 4.5 to 9% negative impact on production implies a cost <strong>of</strong><br />
climate change to be roughly up to 1.5 percent <strong>of</strong> GDP per year. The Government <strong>of</strong> India has<br />
accorded high priority to research and development to cope with climate change in the agriculture<br />
sector.<br />
324 | Page<br />
Climate resilient agriculture for risk mitigation
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Methodology<br />
With this background, the ICAR launched a major Project entitled, National Initiative on<br />
Climate Resilient Agriculture (NICRA) during 2010-11 with an outlay <strong>of</strong> Rs.350 crores for<br />
the XI Plan with the following objective to enhance the resilience <strong>of</strong> Indian agriculture<br />
covering crops, livestock, and fisheries to climatic variability and climate change through the<br />
development and application <strong>of</strong> improved production and risk management technologies, to<br />
demonstrate site-specific technology packages on farmers’ fields for adapting to current<br />
climate risks and to enhance the capacity building <strong>of</strong> scientists and other stakeholders in<br />
climate-resilient agricultural research and its application.<br />
Results<br />
The present study has been undertaken to assess the impact <strong>of</strong> the Technology Demonstration<br />
Component (TDC) <strong>of</strong> the NICRA programme being implemented by the Krishi Vigyan<br />
Kendra, Bhagalpur, Bihar running under the administrative umbrella <strong>of</strong> Agricultural<br />
University, Sabour, Bhagalpur. The performance <strong>of</strong> NICRA-interventions taken up during<br />
Kharif-2022 has been assessed for two villages having sizeable areas (12.50 – 17.39 %) and<br />
farmers (11.0 – 23.81%) under rainfed agriculture and compared with non-NICRA intervened<br />
farmers in the villages. The rainfall characteristics <strong>of</strong> the district during Kharif-2022 have<br />
been experienced as the drought year having total rainfall <strong>of</strong> 535.2 mm (45-61%) against the<br />
yearly amount <strong>of</strong> 1173.3 mm, total Kharif rainfall <strong>of</strong> 330 mm (14.54%) against normal <strong>of</strong><br />
955.40 mm. During the major transplanting (paddy) months <strong>of</strong> July and August 2022, the<br />
district has only received a total rainfall <strong>of</strong> 43.60 (14.1%) & 77.00 mm (29.28%) respectively<br />
with three dry spells (710 days:01 & 715 days:02) which resulted in 15.20 days <strong>of</strong> delayed<br />
transplanting and the leap stage has been impacted with heavy weed infestation (28.5%)<br />
along with 35% decrease in transplanting area with a coverage <strong>of</strong> 36.6 acres. Concerning the<br />
variable weather condition, the NICRA-interventions such as transplanting by short-duration<br />
rice varieties; Sahbhagi, Sabour Harshit & Sita has been undertaken in three villages along<br />
with other climates resilient technologies like the introduction <strong>of</strong> paddy or Sabour Shree with<br />
DSR in the medium irrigated land significantly situated in the NICRA villages. Along with<br />
the technologies demonstration component on paddy varieties, for cattle, de-warmer &<br />
chelated mineral mixture along with PPR-vaccinated in goats have been demonstrated. There<br />
has been a significant in area production, productivity, and B: C ratio due to the NICRA<br />
intervention despite the drought stress experienced by farmers during Kharif-2022 in<br />
comparison to the non-NICRA farmers in the villages.<br />
Conclusion<br />
The project has made a significant initial impact and was well-received in most <strong>of</strong> the<br />
districts. Technologies such as on-farm water harvesting in ponds, supplemental irrigation,<br />
Climate resilient agriculture for risk mitigation<br />
325 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
the introduction <strong>of</strong> early maturing drought-tolerant varieties, paddy varieties tolerant to<br />
submergence in flood-prone districts, improved drainage in waterlogged areas, recharging<br />
techniques for tube wells, site-specific nutrient management and management <strong>of</strong> sodic soils,<br />
mulching, use <strong>of</strong> zero till drills were enthusiastically implemented by the farmers in NICRA<br />
villages across the country.<br />
References<br />
Monsoon Action Plan - 2015 Village Level Contingency Plans for Climate Resilient Agriculture.<br />
Atlas on Climate Change Impacts on Crop Water Balance <strong>of</strong> Groundnut (Arachis hypogaea) and<br />
Pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan) in Rainfed Districts <strong>of</strong> Andhra Pradesh.<br />
Atlas on Climate Change Impacts on Crop Water Balance <strong>of</strong> Cotton (Gossypium herbaceum) and<br />
Maize (Zea mays L.) in Telangana.<br />
AICRPAM - NICRA Annual Report 2014-15.<br />
Effect <strong>of</strong> Pusa Hydrogel on Pearl Millet Crop Yield under Rainfed<br />
Farming<br />
Ramesh Kumar, Ashish Shivran, Poonam Yadav and Manjeet<br />
T2a-39P<br />
Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Mahendergarh, Chaudhary Charan Singh Haryana Agricultural University,<br />
Hisar, Haryana<br />
sckvkmgarh@hau.ac.in<br />
Pearlmillet is a rainfed crop generally grown in arid regions due to high-stress tolerance, and<br />
low water use efficiency. In arid regions or rainfed regions agroclimatic conditions are very<br />
challenging due to scanty rainfall, its distribution, low fertility and poor water-holding<br />
capacity <strong>of</strong> soils, high evaporative demand, and extreme temperature during the year. The<br />
study's objective is to measure the effect <strong>of</strong> hydrogel in pearl millet by reducing water stress<br />
and improving grain yield. In the NICRA project, we have selected ten farmers’ in two<br />
rainfed villages i.e. Bairawas and Gadania in the Mahendergarh district <strong>of</strong> Haryana in India.<br />
Methodology<br />
Pearlmillet variety HHB-67 (Improved) was sown in 45 cm row spacing and recommended<br />
doses <strong>of</strong> fertilizers and other cultivation practices were adopted. Seed treatment was done and<br />
then sowing <strong>of</strong> seed with Pusa hydrogel. The rainfall received during the growing period<br />
(June to September) was 557.1 mm in 2022. Actual observed data collected from existing<br />
automated weather stations at KVK, Mahendergarh were used to establish the uncertainties <strong>of</strong><br />
the secondary data. Focus Group Discussions (FGD) was designed to assess the existing<br />
326 | Page<br />
Climate resilient agriculture for risk mitigation
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
cropping system (e.g., rainfed vs. rainfed with hydrogel application), management practices,<br />
yield gaps, major constraints, and resource availability for the two sites.<br />
Results<br />
The two sites <strong>of</strong> study, Bairawas, and Gadania located in South Haryana <strong>of</strong> rainfed regions,<br />
presented a similar range <strong>of</strong> productivity despite their difference in cropping system<br />
management practices and their level <strong>of</strong> risk <strong>of</strong> climatic stresses. The average actual yield<br />
reported in the sites ranged from 22.5 to 25 q/ha. These yield values indicated a large<br />
potential to increase yield in these sites by using an application <strong>of</strong> hydrogel under the existing<br />
environmental conditions. The increase in pearmillet yield is 14 to 23 percent from rainfed +<br />
Pusa hydrogel as compared to rainfed pearlmillet only.<br />
Conclusion<br />
It may be concluded that the application <strong>of</strong> pusa hydrogel in the rainfed region is beneficial<br />
for water stress overcome in the pearl millet crop (HHB-67 Imp.) and increases crop yield.<br />
T2a-40P-1566<br />
Impact <strong>of</strong> Climate Resilient Practices on Cabbage Productivity in NICRA<br />
Villages <strong>of</strong> Tuensang District in Nagaland<br />
Pijush Kanti Biswas, Kerimenla and Watisenla Imsong<br />
Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Tuensang, Nagaland-798612<br />
Cabbage is the number one vegetable and source <strong>of</strong> survival for majority <strong>of</strong> the small holder<br />
farmers across the Tuensang district. Yet the crop frequently fails when hit by the severe<br />
recurrent droughts. Small scale farmers beset by erratic rainfall and drought like situation in<br />
the district since many years. Cabbage variety Rareball performed very well in stress prone<br />
areas coupled with climate resilient practices like seedling raised in polypropylene trays,<br />
polythene mulching or mulching by locally available leaves. To know the impact <strong>of</strong> climate<br />
resilient practices on Cabbage productivity a study was carried out during 2021-22. A total <strong>of</strong><br />
20 farmers were selected in adopted NICRA village as well as non-adopted nearby village.<br />
The result <strong>of</strong> the study revealed that majority <strong>of</strong> the farmers under adopted village who<br />
followed the proper climate resilient practices has achieved good yield compare to the nonadopted<br />
nearby village farmers. In drought or uneven and erratic rainfall situation <strong>of</strong><br />
Tuensang district, drought resistant variety <strong>of</strong> Cabbage (Rareball) along with climate resilient<br />
practices is recorded productivity increase upto 20 percent over non-adopted farmers field.<br />
Climate resilient agriculture for risk mitigation<br />
327 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
T2a-41P-1493<br />
Enhance the Climate Resilience Through Rainfed Agriculture under<br />
NICRA Project in Srikakulam District <strong>of</strong> North Coastal AP<br />
G. Naveen Kumar*, B.Mounika, S.Kiran kumar, K.Bhagya Lakshmi, P.Amara Jyothi,<br />
D.Chinnam Naidu, G.Chitti Babu, S.Neelaveni, Ch.BalaKrishna, V.Hari Kumar,<br />
S.Anusha, B.Suneetha<br />
Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Amadalavalasa, Srikakulam District, AP<br />
*naveengottapu.1992@gmail.com<br />
Rainfed agriculture is practiced in 80% <strong>of</strong> net cultivated area under Rabi in Srikakulam<br />
district. Due to lack <strong>of</strong> proper irrigation and water sources, farmers are mainly depending on<br />
rainfed agriculture during this period. By keeping this in view KVK Srikakulam implemented<br />
NICRA project in five villages to minimize the crop losses during rabi. Under NICRA project<br />
KVK, Srikakulam promoted water conservation and crop diversification with zero tillage<br />
maize, Rice fallows pulses, ICM practices in sesamum during rabi season. These efforts have<br />
been made through NICRA towards climate resilient rainfed agriculture to enhance the<br />
adaptive capacity <strong>of</strong> farmers. On-farm participatory demonstration <strong>of</strong> climate resilient<br />
practices under cluster village mode helped famers to cope with aberrant weather and <strong>of</strong>fseason<br />
floods and dry spells. Establishing village level institutions such as village climate risk<br />
management committees (VCRMC), custom hiring centres for farm mechanization, seed and<br />
fodder production systems and mechanism for agro-advisories to develop climate resilient<br />
villages<br />
The initiatives like development or renovation <strong>of</strong> community tank bunds were promoted to<br />
build sustainable and risk resilient rainfed agriculture. Capacity building <strong>of</strong> farmers on<br />
climate resilient technologies increased preparedness for weather and climate risk. Several<br />
resilient technologies like water saving technologies and crop diversification with zero tillage<br />
maize, ragi cultivation, rice fallows pulses, ICM practices in sesamum in rabi season have<br />
been integrated to achieving climate resilient rainfed agriculture. Upscaling <strong>of</strong> resilient<br />
technologies through KVK initiative created better preparedness in climate resilient rainfed<br />
agriculture in adopted villages. Implementation <strong>of</strong> NICRA by KVK had done excellence in<br />
reimagining climate resilient rainfed agriculture for better living <strong>of</strong> farmers through reduced<br />
crop loss and increasing the net income <strong>of</strong> farmers in the region <strong>of</strong> Srikakulam district <strong>of</strong><br />
north coastal Andhra Pradesh.<br />
NRM Works in NICRA Project: Renovation <strong>of</strong> Jagannada Naidu water tank under<br />
NRM- NICRA<br />
Due to low tank capacity, weakened sluices and bunds, floods in tank fed areas affected the<br />
crop yields. Main objective <strong>of</strong> this NRM work is to reduce the flood in tank fed fields and to<br />
328 | Page<br />
Climate resilient agriculture for risk mitigation
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
overcome water scarcity at early & later stages <strong>of</strong> the crop. In 2011-12 water storage capacity<br />
was 55,531m 3 . After completion <strong>of</strong> NRM through NICRA project the water storage capacity<br />
was increased up to 1,38,575 m 3 (25 acres in 4.5 feet depth) and the cultivated area increased<br />
from 12ha (2011-12) to 45ha (2021-22) in rabi season.<br />
Upscalling <strong>of</strong> Dry land crops in zero tillage cultivation in rice fallows<br />
In Srikakulam district farmers are following the conventional method <strong>of</strong> cultivation for crops<br />
such as maize, pulses, ragi, sunhemp, these methods <strong>of</strong> sowing not only waste the residual<br />
moisture <strong>of</strong> the field but also involves many operational costs. Thus, to avoid such moisture<br />
loss and to make it more economical KVK, Srikakulam has introduced zero tillage maize,<br />
ragi, sunhemp and pulses in rice fallows as part <strong>of</strong> NICRA project. Proper utilization <strong>of</strong><br />
residual moisture coupled with remunerative prices for the farmers is the main objective <strong>of</strong><br />
this NICRA project.<br />
Maize<br />
Ragi<br />
Upscalling Zero tillage maize cultivation in<br />
rice fallow in Iskalapalem village<br />
Sunhemp<br />
Upcalling Zero tillage Ragi cultivation in rice<br />
fallow in kondavalasa village<br />
Pulses<br />
Sunhemp seed production under rice fallow<br />
in sirusuwada village<br />
Conclusion<br />
Rice fallow pulses (Black gram, Greengram)<br />
in Iskalapalem village<br />
Climate resilient agriculture for risk mitigation<br />
329 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Krishi vigyan Kendra Srikakulam implemented various initiatives such as promotion <strong>of</strong> water<br />
saving technologies and crop diversification under NICRA villages in Srikakulam district <strong>of</strong><br />
Andhra Pradesh. These initiatives not only reduced cost and labour but also created<br />
awareness among the farmers towards climate vulnerability. Various activities such as<br />
renovation <strong>of</strong> community tank bunds, capacity building <strong>of</strong> famers, promotion <strong>of</strong> climate<br />
resilient technologies and formation <strong>of</strong> VCRMC (Village climate risk management<br />
committee) by KVK helped the famers to mitigate climatic risk.<br />
330 | Page<br />
Climate resilient agriculture for risk mitigation
Theme– 3<br />
Managing genetic resources for enhanced<br />
stress tolerance
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Theme – 3: Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance<br />
List <strong>of</strong> <strong>Extended</strong> Summaries<br />
S.No Title First Author ID<br />
1 Evaluation <strong>of</strong> Eggplant Wild Relatives,<br />
Landraces and Cultivars for Deficit Moisture<br />
Stress Tolerance<br />
2 Mapping QTLs for Various Yield Component<br />
and Stress Indices in Recombinant Inbred Lines<br />
Populations <strong>of</strong> Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)<br />
3 Studies on Soybean Based Rainfed Cropping<br />
Sequences in Vertisols <strong>of</strong> Madhya Pradesh<br />
4 Samrat Bt – A New, Early Maturing Bt Cotton<br />
Variety for Stress Resilience and Multiple<br />
Cropping in Rainfed Agro-Ecologies <strong>of</strong> South<br />
India<br />
5 Characterization and Evaluation <strong>of</strong> Pigeonpea<br />
Mini Core Collection for Moisture Stress<br />
Tolerance in Rainfed Condition<br />
KT Jayalakshmi<br />
Godawari Pawar<br />
Narendra Kumawat<br />
HB Santosh<br />
K Salini<br />
T3-01O-1297<br />
T3-02O-1393<br />
T3-03O-1463<br />
T3-04O-1123<br />
T3-05R-1029<br />
6 Salt Tolerance in Transgenic Pigeonpea Neeru Singh Redhu T3-06R-1584<br />
7 Performance <strong>of</strong> Tamarind Accessions under<br />
Dryland Conditions.<br />
8 Administering the Natural Genetic Diversity for<br />
Improving Stress Tolerance<br />
9 Effect <strong>of</strong> Different Weed Control Management<br />
Practices on Kharif French Bean<br />
10 Integrated Pest Management Strategies for Fall<br />
Army Worm in Southern Telangana<br />
11 Performance <strong>of</strong> Pigeonpea (BDN 711) Under<br />
Rainfed Condition in Beed District <strong>of</strong><br />
Maharashtra<br />
12 Isolation and Quantitative Screening <strong>of</strong> Potential<br />
Fungal Isolates for Cellulase Activity<br />
13 Yellow revolution Success in Sodic Soil<br />
Through Salt Resistant Variety <strong>of</strong> Mustard (CS-<br />
58)<br />
14 Weed Management Strategies Under Different<br />
Tillage Systems in Wet Direct Seeded Rice<br />
AGK Reddy<br />
RS Telem<br />
KA Chavan<br />
A Ramakrishna Babu<br />
HS Garud<br />
Savitha Santosh<br />
AK Srivastava<br />
P Gayathri<br />
T3-07R-1040<br />
T3-08R-1444<br />
T3-09R-1356<br />
T3-10R-1220<br />
T3-11R-1009<br />
T3-11aR-1263<br />
T3-12P-1433<br />
T3-13P-1253<br />
331 | Page Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
S.No Title First Author ID<br />
15 Screening Potato Varieties and Advanced<br />
Clones for Maximizing Organic Tuber<br />
Productivity<br />
16 Assessment <strong>of</strong> Performance <strong>of</strong> Drought Tolerant<br />
Rice Variety in Koshi region<br />
17 Drought Tolerant and High Yielding Groundnut<br />
Varieties for Rainfed Ecosystem in Perambalur<br />
district<br />
18 Eco-friendly Management <strong>of</strong> White Grub- A<br />
Devastating Insect Pest <strong>of</strong> Rainfed Agro-<br />
Ecosystem in Uttarakhand Hills<br />
19 Effect <strong>of</strong> Crop Geometry on Growth and Yield<br />
Under Direct Seeded Hybrid Rice (Oryza Sativa<br />
L.) Cultivars<br />
20 Evaluation <strong>of</strong> Bamboo Species Suitable for<br />
Southern Telangana Region<br />
21 Evaluation <strong>of</strong> Different Herbicides in Kharif<br />
Sweet Corn (Zea mays saccharata.L)<br />
22 Evaluation <strong>of</strong> F3:4 Population for Seedling<br />
Stage Salinity Tolerance in Rice (Oryza sativa<br />
L.)<br />
23 Evaluation <strong>of</strong> Newer Insecticides Against<br />
Safflower Aphid, Uroleucon compositae<br />
(Theobald)<br />
24 Evaluation <strong>of</strong> STRVs Under Different Crop<br />
Establishment System in Rainfed Stress-Prone<br />
Upland Rice Ecosystem <strong>of</strong> Eastern Uttar<br />
Pradesh<br />
25 High Resolution Dissection <strong>of</strong> Photosystem II<br />
Electron Transport Under Elevated CO2 and<br />
Elevated Temperature under Carbon Dioxide<br />
and Temperature Gradient Chambers (CTGC) in<br />
Pearl Millet (Pennisetum glaucum L.)<br />
26 Impact <strong>of</strong> Adoption on Improved Varieties <strong>of</strong><br />
Chickpea (Cicer Arietinum) on Yield<br />
Performance under NICRA Village <strong>of</strong> Ratlam<br />
District in Madhya Pradesh<br />
Pooja Mankar<br />
PK Chaudhary<br />
M Punithavathi<br />
Kamal K Pande<br />
Ajoy Das<br />
G Venkatesh<br />
SB Tambare<br />
M Vani Praveena<br />
SM Gangurde<br />
Kajal Verma<br />
Arun K. Shanker<br />
GP Tiwari<br />
T3-14P-1485<br />
T3-15P-1208<br />
T3-16P-1414<br />
T3-17P-1425<br />
T3-18P-1285<br />
T3-19P-1045<br />
T3-20P-1218<br />
T3-21P-1420<br />
T3-22P-1543<br />
T3-23P-1191<br />
T3-24P-1050<br />
T3-25P-1470<br />
Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance<br />
332 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
S.No Title First Author ID<br />
27 Impact <strong>of</strong> Nutritional Manipulation in Cattle <strong>of</strong><br />
Saline Coastal Areas <strong>of</strong> Sundarban for Stress<br />
Management<br />
28 Management <strong>of</strong> Fall Armyworm, Spodoptera<br />
Frugiperda in Organic Sorghum Cultivation<br />
29 Morpho-Physiological Characterization <strong>of</strong><br />
Drought Stress Tolerance at Flowering Stage in<br />
Black Gram (Vigna mungo L. Hepper)<br />
30 Performance <strong>of</strong> Buckwheat (Fagopyrum<br />
esculentum Moench) Genotypes Under Varied<br />
Fertility Levels in Northern Transition Zone <strong>of</strong><br />
Karnataka<br />
31 Performance <strong>of</strong> Chickpea (Var.Phule Vikram)<br />
Under Rainfed Condition in Solapur District <strong>of</strong><br />
Maharashtra<br />
32 Performance <strong>of</strong> Chickpea Varieties Under Late<br />
Sown Condition<br />
33 PGPR Strain Bbv57 Controls Stalk Rot <strong>of</strong> Maize<br />
Caused by Fusarium Verticillioides<br />
34 Physiological Parameters and Key Root Traits<br />
Contributing to Yield Potentital <strong>of</strong> Sorghum in<br />
the Northern Dry Zone <strong>of</strong> Karnataka<br />
35 Productivity Enhancement <strong>of</strong> Lentil (Lens<br />
esculenta Moench) in Rainfed Agro-Ecosystem<br />
in Koshi Region <strong>of</strong> Bihar<br />
36 Productivity Enhancement Using Drought<br />
Tolerant Banana Variety Through Frontline<br />
Demonstrations in Perambalur District <strong>of</strong><br />
Tamilnadu<br />
37 Response <strong>of</strong> Clusterbean (Gum Gaur) Genotypes<br />
to Planting Geometry in Rainfed Conditions<br />
38 Screening Maize Inbred Lines Developed from<br />
Local Germplasm for Excess Moisture<br />
Tolerance<br />
39 Study on Inter-Relation <strong>of</strong> Yield and the<br />
Associated Traits in Maize Hybrids Under<br />
Rainfed Conditions<br />
C Majhi<br />
G Shyam Prasad<br />
B Sarkar<br />
HP Keerthi<br />
SG Jadhav<br />
SV Thombre<br />
Radhajeyalakshmi<br />
Raju<br />
RS Venkatesha<br />
KM Singh<br />
V Sangeetha<br />
RA Nandagavi<br />
E Lamalakshmi Devi<br />
KRV Sathya Sheela<br />
T3-26P-1489<br />
T3-27P-1188<br />
T3-28P-1331<br />
T3-29P-1525<br />
T3-30P-1336<br />
T3-31P-1418<br />
T3-32P-1223<br />
T3-33P-1211<br />
T3-34P-1554<br />
T3-35P:1426<br />
T3-36P-1240<br />
T3-37P-1245<br />
T3-38P-1241<br />
333 | Page Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
S.No Title First Author ID<br />
40 Transpiration Efficiency in Pearl Millet Hybrid<br />
and Open Pollinated Variety<br />
41 Variability in Growth and Yield Responses <strong>of</strong><br />
Four Blackgram Genotypes at Elevated CO 2<br />
42 Varietal Performance Arid Fruit Crop<br />
Pomegranate under Vidarbha Region <strong>of</strong><br />
Maharashtra State<br />
43 Assessment <strong>of</strong> Genetic Diversity Among the<br />
Maize (Zea Mays L.) Genotypes Based on SSR<br />
Markers Linked to Drought Tolerance<br />
N Jyothi Lakshmi<br />
M Vanaja<br />
RS Wankhade<br />
P Sathish<br />
T3-39P-1088<br />
T3-40P-1086<br />
T3-41P-1169<br />
T3-42P<br />
Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance<br />
334 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
T3-01O-1297<br />
Evaluation <strong>of</strong> Eggplant Wild Relatives, Landraces and Cultivars for Deficit<br />
Moisture Stress Tolerance<br />
K.T. Jayalakshmi, R.H. Laxman, S. Kannan, P. Hemamalini, K.S. Shivashankara and<br />
T.H. Singh<br />
ICAR-Indian Institute <strong>of</strong> Horticultural Research, Hesaraghatta, Bengaluru-560 089, India<br />
Eggplant (Solanum melongena L.), also known as brinjal belonging to Solanaceae family is an<br />
important vegetable grown in many tropical and subtropical areas <strong>of</strong> the world. Brinjal<br />
cultivation in India is estimated to cover about 8.14% <strong>of</strong> vegetable area with a contribution <strong>of</strong><br />
9% to total vegetable production. The crop is exposed to various biotic and abiotic stresses.<br />
Among the abiotic stresses, deficit water stress is one the most serious environmental<br />
constraints affecting productivity. Under climate change conditions more frequent, longer, and<br />
intense drought spells would increase the scarcity <strong>of</strong> irrigation water. A series <strong>of</strong> consequent<br />
physiological or biochemical adjustments would bring in enhancement <strong>of</strong> the plant defence<br />
against deficit water stress (Kapoor et al., 2020) Identification <strong>of</strong> deficit moisture stress tolerant<br />
cultivars in eggplant is very important to realize sustainable production and judicious use <strong>of</strong><br />
available water (Gobu et al., 2017). Significant differences among hundred varieties <strong>of</strong><br />
eggplant and its wild relatives, for morphological and physiological characteristics, under<br />
drought stress condition were observed (Delfin et al., 2013). There are possibilities <strong>of</strong> selection<br />
<strong>of</strong> drought resistant eggplant varieties. Brinjal can also be used as rootstock as it provides root<br />
system to scions <strong>of</strong> tomato for enhancing tolerance to abiotic stresses. Eggplant is employed as<br />
an important rootstock because <strong>of</strong> its tolerance to biotic and abiotic factors. However,<br />
evaluation needs to be done for exploring the possibility <strong>of</strong> identifying and characterizing<br />
deficit water stress tolerant genotypes having better root characteristics. Thus, the present study<br />
was conducted with an objective to evaluate the diverse genotypes <strong>of</strong> eggplant wild relatives,<br />
land races and cultivars for deficit moisture stress tolerance and consequently identify the<br />
tolerant genotypes.<br />
Methodology<br />
Thirty-four eggplant genotypes were evaluated under 100 per cent field capacity up to 45 DAT.<br />
Based on the mean membership function value (MFV) for root characteristics, such as root<br />
length, root volume and root density and root dry weight, six genotypes with better root<br />
characteristics, viz., Arka Neelkanth, Arka Anand, Kheri Sindhi, Erengeri Local, Solanum<br />
macrocarpon, Solanum torvum and three genotypes, Solanum seaforthianum, Solanum<br />
insanum and Solanum acculeatissimum JRPH/15-008 with poor root characteristics were<br />
selected for further studies under two water regimes, viz., control (100% FC) and water deficit<br />
335 | Page Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
stress (50% FC). The observations on various growth, physiological and biochemical<br />
parameters were recorded following the established procedures.<br />
Results<br />
Under water stress conditions, the genotypes exhibited diverse physiological and biochemical<br />
responses. The genotypes with better root characteristics such as Kheri Sindhi, Erengeri Local<br />
and Solanum macrocarpon showed tolerance to deficit moisture through lower percentage<br />
reduction in root characteristics like root volume, root fresh weight and root dry weight<br />
followed by Arka Neelkanth and Arka Anand and the genotypes with poor root characteristics,<br />
Solanum seaforthianum, Solanum acculeatissimum JRPH/15-008 and Solanum insanum<br />
showed susceptibility with greater reduction in root characteristics.<br />
The genotypes Kheri Sindhi, Erengeri Local and Solanum macrocarpon showed lower percent<br />
reduction in total dry matter production and higher percent increase in root to shoot ratio,<br />
followed by Arka Neelkant and Arka Anand. They also showed lower percent reduction in<br />
leaf relative water content. These genotypes showed lower percent increase in canopy<br />
temperature, higher percent accumulation <strong>of</strong> proline content with lower production <strong>of</strong> MDA.<br />
The genotypes with better root characteristics showed lower ABA and higher cytokinin<br />
content. Whereas the genotypes, Solanum seaforthianum, Solanum acculeatissimum JRPH/15-<br />
008 and Solanum insanum showed lower proline accumulation and higher MDA content. These<br />
genotypes also exhibited higher activity <strong>of</strong> anti-oxidative enzymes and ABA content with<br />
lower cytokine content in roots.<br />
Conclusion<br />
From the results obtained from the present study it is concluded that the genotypes with better<br />
root characteristics, Kheri Sindhi, Erengeri Local and Solanum macrocarpon, Arka Neelkanth<br />
and Arka Anand showed tolerance to deficit moisture stress condition compared to genotypes<br />
with poor root characteristics.<br />
References<br />
Delfin, E., Manaday, S.J., Canama, A.O., Ocampo, E.T.M. and Maghirang, R. 2013.<br />
Assessment <strong>of</strong> the drought response <strong>of</strong> genetically diverse eggplant<br />
genotypes. Philippine Journal <strong>of</strong> Crop Science 38(1): 69-70.<br />
Gobu, R., Harish Babu B.N., Kailash Chandra, Shankar M. and Omprakash. 2017. Genetic<br />
Variability, Heritability and Genetic Advance in Eggplant (Solanum melongena L.)<br />
Genotypes under Normal and Osmotic Stress in invitro condition. Int. J. Curr.<br />
Microbiol. App. Sci. 6(3): 749-760.<br />
Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance<br />
336 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Kapoor, D., Bhardwaj, S., Landi, M., Sharma, A., Ramakrishnan, M. and Sharma, A. 2020.<br />
The impact <strong>of</strong> drought in plant metabolism: How to exploit tolerance mechanisms to<br />
increase crop production. Appl. Sci., 10(16): 5692.<br />
T3-02O-1393<br />
Mapping QTLs for Various Yield Component and Stress Indices in<br />
Recombinant Inbred Lines Populations <strong>of</strong> Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)<br />
Godawari Pawar 1* , Vishwanathan Chinnusamy 2 , Monika Dalal 3 , S. Sudhir Kumar 2 ,<br />
Harikrishna and Biswabiplab Singh 2<br />
1 VNMKV, Parbhani (MS), 2 ICAR-NIPB, New Delhi and 3 ICAR-IARI, New Delhi<br />
*gsp.mau@rediffmail.com<br />
An experimental set up comprising <strong>of</strong> 278 RILs and 2 parental lines was conducted at the<br />
Division <strong>of</strong> Plant Physiology, Indian Agricultural Research Institute (IARI), New Delhi.<br />
Calculation <strong>of</strong> indices mainly focus on selecting genotypes that have high yield firstly under<br />
yield potential conditions (non-stress) and secondly under stress conditions. Multiple stress<br />
indices were calculated on the basis <strong>of</strong> grain yield, thousand grain weight, grain weight per ear,<br />
grain number per ear and harvest index. The correlation among multiple stress indices were<br />
seen and presented. Pattern <strong>of</strong> selection value <strong>of</strong> TOL, SSI and RCI as minimum and STI, MPI,<br />
YSI, HM, GMP and PCI as maximum were considered as indicator for selection <strong>of</strong> RILs. On<br />
this basis <strong>of</strong> TOL, SSI, RCI and YSI some RILs and on the basis <strong>of</strong> STI, MPI, HM, GMP and<br />
PCI we selected some RILs. These RILs are superior under stress condition. In Field trials<br />
calculated stress intensity is 0.38. The larger the value <strong>of</strong> SI, the more severe is the stress<br />
intensity. Grain yield under normal sowing is positively correlated with all indices except STI<br />
(-0.01) and YSI (-0.43). Grain yield under heat stress is showing strong positive association<br />
with HM (0.94) also with GMP (0.88), MP (0.78) negative with TOL (-0.51) and SSI (-<br />
0.74).This results concluded that population with higher HM are superior under stress<br />
conditions and negative association <strong>of</strong> yield under stress with TOL and SSI, it indicates yield<br />
loss under stress conditions. Stress indices MP (0.83, 0.78) and GMP (0.70, 0.88) are suitable<br />
to screen tolerance because positive association with grain yield <strong>of</strong> both treatments. From<br />
correlation <strong>of</strong> different indices, some indices are showing strong association among them so all<br />
indices were selected for further discussion except TOL and MP. Traits related to yield Viz.,<br />
thousand kernel weight, grains/ear, grains weight/ear and harvest index were also used to<br />
calculate indices and their correlation were used for further discussion.<br />
Inclusive composite interval mapping (ICIM) analysis discovered the total <strong>of</strong> 55 putative QTLs<br />
controlling yield related traits and their stress indices based on heat and control conditions on<br />
field. These QTLs were found distributed across the chromosomes with LOD values varied<br />
from 2.509 to 5.485. Among multiple stress indices 9 QTLs controlling the harmonic mean and<br />
337 | Page Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
susceptibility tolerance index, likewise for geometric mean productivity, mean productivity<br />
and production capacity we found 8 QTLs for each index on the basis <strong>of</strong> different yield related<br />
traits i.e. grain numbers per spike, grain weight per spike, thousand kernel weight, total grain<br />
weight and harvest index. We propose this method for evaluation <strong>of</strong> wheat genotypes in terms<br />
<strong>of</strong> their resilience to stress and their production capacity. This methodology will reduce the<br />
time required for first selection and the number <strong>of</strong> first-selected genotypes for further<br />
evaluation by breeders and provide a basis for appropriate comparisons <strong>of</strong> genotypes that would<br />
help reveal the biology behind high stress productivity <strong>of</strong> crops.<br />
T3-03O-1463<br />
Studies on Soybean Based Rainfed Cropping Sequences in Vertisols <strong>of</strong><br />
Madhya Pradesh<br />
Narendra Kumawat*, M.L. Jadav, D.V. Bhagat, S.K. Choudhary and K.S. Bangar<br />
All India Coordinated Research Project for Dryland Farming, College <strong>of</strong> Agriculture (RVSKVV)<br />
Indore – 452 001, Madhya Pradesh, India<br />
*kumawatandy@gmail.com<br />
The traditional cropping systems in kharif are soybean, cotton, maize, etc. and intercropping<br />
systems are soybean + maize/pigeonpea/etc. Length <strong>of</strong> growing period is 90-120 days.<br />
Generally, soybean is grown as a monsoon season crop under rainfed situation mainly under<br />
Vertisols and associated soils. It has resulted increased cropping intensity and pr<strong>of</strong>itability. In<br />
Malwa and Nimar valley region, its cultivation is largely practiced in rainy season followed by<br />
gram/wheat on conserved soil moisture. Under irrigated conditions, soybean is largely grown<br />
in soybean-wheat cropping system, while soybean-chickpea cropping system is prevalent under<br />
rainfed conditions. The major cropping system in the Vertisols and associated soils <strong>of</strong> Central<br />
India under regime is soybean-wheat in which soybean is a rainfed crop.<br />
Methodology<br />
Field experiments were conducted at AICRP for Dryland Agriculture, College <strong>of</strong> Agriculture<br />
(RVSKVV), Indore (MP) during 2018-19 to 2020-21, to find out the suitable cropping<br />
sequences for Malwa and Nimar valley region. Nine cropping sequences including<br />
soybean/maize/blackgram-based cropping systems, viz., soybean-chickpea, soybean-safflower,<br />
soybean-mustard, maize-chickpea, maize-safflower, maize-mustard, blackgram-chickpea,<br />
blackgram-safflower and blackgram -mustard were tested in randomized block design with 5<br />
replications. The present study mainly aims at finding the impact <strong>of</strong> soybean based cropping<br />
sequences on productivity and pr<strong>of</strong>itability under rainfed condition.<br />
Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance<br />
338 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Results<br />
Among the various sequences, soybean equivalent yield <strong>of</strong> maize–chickpea cropping sequence<br />
was the highest (4153 q/ha), followed by maize-mustard (3293 q/ha) and maize–safflower<br />
sequence (3222 q/ha). Existing soybean-chickpea sequence recorded soybean equivalent yield<br />
<strong>of</strong> 2586 t/ha, which is 60.60% lesser than maize-chickpea cropping sequence. The maizechickpea<br />
cropping sequence also recorded the maximum net returns (Rs. 146890/ha) and B:C<br />
ratio (4.67) followed by maize-mustard (Rs.1,48,200/ha Rs.1,08,200/ha and 3.71, respectively)<br />
and maize–safflower sequence (Rs.1,44,990/ha Rs.1,04,990/ha and 3.62, respectively. While<br />
the, highest land use efficiency (98.63%) was noticed with maize-mustard followed by<br />
blackgram-mustard sequence. This might be due to increase in the yield <strong>of</strong> maize and chickpea<br />
under maize-chickpea cropping sequence resulting increase the returns over other cropping<br />
sequences. Higher system pr<strong>of</strong>itability may be attributed to higher productivity <strong>of</strong> maize than<br />
other kharif crops and lower duration <strong>of</strong> the crops in sequence. Similar findings were also<br />
reported by Prajapat et al. (2015) and Singh et al. (2019).<br />
Soybean equivalent yield (SEY), economics and various efficiencies as affected by<br />
Cropping sequence<br />
cropping sequences (Mean data <strong>of</strong> 3 years)<br />
SEY<br />
(kg/ha)<br />
Net<br />
returns <strong>of</strong><br />
system<br />
(Rs. /ha)<br />
B:C<br />
ratio<br />
Total<br />
duration<br />
(days)<br />
Land use<br />
efficiency<br />
(%)<br />
Relative<br />
Production<br />
efficiency<br />
(%)<br />
T 1-Soybean- chickpea 2586 76370 2.91 230 63.01 -<br />
T 2-Soybean- safflower 1606 32250 1.81 273 74.79 -37.91<br />
T 3-Soybean- mustard 1783 40220 2.01 259 70.96 -31.06<br />
T 4-Maize-chickpea 4153 146890 4.67 230 63.01 60.60<br />
T 5-Maize- safflower 3222 104990 3.62 273 74.79 24.59<br />
T 6-Maize- mustard 3293 108200 3.71 372 98.63 27.35<br />
T 7-Blackgram-chickpea 2314 64125 2.60 205 56.16 -10.52<br />
T 8-Blackgram - safflower 1481 26650 1.67 248 67.95 -42.73<br />
T 9-Blackgram - mustard 1444 24995 1.62 347 95.07 -44.15<br />
SEm+ 58 1678 0.07 - - -<br />
LSD (P=0.05) 168 4833 0.20 - - -<br />
References<br />
Singh, D.K., Singh, R., Singh, G.D., Singh, A.P., Chaturdevi, S., Singh, J.P., Rathi, A. and<br />
Singh, M. 2019. Diversification <strong>of</strong> rice (Oryza sativa)-wheat (Triticum aestivum)<br />
system and its influence on productivity, pr<strong>of</strong>itability and energetics under on-farm<br />
situation. Indian J. Agron., 62 (3): 255-259.<br />
339 | Page Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Prajapat, K., Vyas, A.K. and Dhar, S. 2015. Effect <strong>of</strong> cropping systems and nutrient<br />
management practices on growth, productivity, economics and nutrient uptake <strong>of</strong><br />
soybean (Glycine max). Indian J. Agric. Sci., 85(9): 1138-1143.<br />
Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance<br />
T3-04O-1123<br />
Samrat Bt – A New, Early Maturing Bt Cotton Variety for Stress Resilience<br />
and Multiple Cropping in Rainfed Agro-Ecologies <strong>of</strong> South India<br />
H. B. Santosh *1,4 , S. Manickam 1 , S. B. Singh 1 , V. N. Waghmare 1 , K. P. Raghavendra 1 ,<br />
Vivek Shah 1 , K. R. Kranthi 2 , Kunal Gaikwad 1 , S. S. Patil 3 , G. Ravindra Chary 4 and<br />
V.K. Singh 4<br />
1 ICAR – Central Institute for Cotton Research, Nagpur 440010, Maharashtra<br />
2 International Cotton Advisory Committee, Washington DC 20006-1635, USA<br />
3 University <strong>of</strong> Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad 580005, Karnataka<br />
4 ICAR-Central Research Institute on Dryland Agriculture, Hyderabad 500059<br />
* hb.santosh@icar.gov.in<br />
Bt cotton was developed as an alternate strategy to the previously used hazardous insecticides<br />
to circumvent bollworm problem. Though majority <strong>of</strong> cotton production in India comes from<br />
Bt cotton, the cotton productivity in India is low compared to world average (>750 kg/hectare)<br />
and is found stagnated at around 500 kg lint per hectare for past many years (Kranthi and Stone,<br />
2020). One <strong>of</strong> the reasons attributed to this productivity stagnation is deployment <strong>of</strong> Bt<br />
technology in the form <strong>of</strong> Bt hybrids in rainfed conditions which accounts to more than 60%<br />
<strong>of</strong> cotton area in India. Majority <strong>of</strong> the popular Bt hybrids are long duration that suffer moisture<br />
stress at boll formation stage due to poor water retention <strong>of</strong> shallow soils in rainfed regions.<br />
Productivity enhancement in India can come from yield improvement in rainfed ecosystems<br />
through development and deployment <strong>of</strong> Bt cotton varieties (Singh et al., 2021). Additionally,<br />
to address the menace <strong>of</strong> Pink bollworm and also to enable farmers taking multiple crops, we<br />
embarked upon development <strong>of</strong> early maturing Bt cotton varieties for rainfed agro-ecologies<br />
<strong>of</strong> India.<br />
Methodology<br />
An F 2 population <strong>of</strong> the 4 parental cross [(Bikaneri Narma Bt × RCRSC7) × (RCRSC2 ×<br />
RCRSC12)] was phenotyped for traits <strong>of</strong> interest like crop maturity, plant architecture, jassid<br />
tolerance, yield and fibre quality attributes at ICAR-CICR, Nagpur during Kharif, 2013-14.<br />
The promising plants were selected, advanced and stabilized through pedigree breeding during<br />
2014-15 to 2017-18. The presence <strong>of</strong> Bt gene (cry1Ac) and transgenic event (Mon531) was<br />
confirmed through ELISA and event specific PCR. The homozygosity <strong>of</strong> the transgene was<br />
confirmed through zygosity PCR. The rapid generation advancement was achieved by taking<br />
<strong>of</strong>f-season crop at CICR Regional Station, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu. The most promising<br />
340 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
entries were sponsored for third party evaluation to ‘ICAR-AICRP on Cotton’ at different<br />
rainfed locations <strong>of</strong> South India.<br />
Results<br />
The sponsored entry, Bt 183059-2 was evaluated under rainfed conditions at 25 locations <strong>of</strong> south<br />
India over 3 years along with appropriate Bt and non-Bt checks. This variety has yielded an average<br />
<strong>of</strong> 1373 kg/ha <strong>of</strong> seed cotton across locations in ICAR-AICRP trials. The potential yield <strong>of</strong> this<br />
variety is 2414 kg/ha which was recorded at Mudhole during 2019-20. The average boll weight <strong>of</strong><br />
this entry is 3.7g with a potential <strong>of</strong> 4.7g. This medium staple Bt cotton genotype possesses an<br />
average ginning out turn (GOT) <strong>of</strong> 36.7% with the potential <strong>of</strong> 42.0%. This variety is compact in<br />
plant architecture with an average <strong>of</strong> less than 1 monopodia for plant with average <strong>of</strong> 70.32 bolls<br />
for metre square indicating its amenability to HDPS.<br />
Performance <strong>of</strong> Samrat Bt in ICAR-AICRP trials under rainfed conditions <strong>of</strong> southern<br />
India during 2018-2021<br />
Trait group<br />
Plant<br />
architectural<br />
traits<br />
Yield and<br />
yield<br />
component<br />
traits<br />
Fibre quality<br />
traits<br />
Response<br />
against<br />
insects<br />
Trait<br />
Trial<br />
Locations<br />
Plant height (cm) 25 105.83<br />
Monopodia (No’s) 25 0.97<br />
Sympodia (No’s) 25 16.63<br />
Mean yield (kg/ha) 25 1373.64<br />
Bolls per plant (No’s) 25 16.4<br />
Bolls per square meter (No’s) 25 70.32<br />
Lint index 25 4.93<br />
Seed Index (g) 25 9.07<br />
GOT (%) 25 36.77<br />
Upper Half Mean Length (mm) 25 25.17<br />
Micronaire (µg/inch) 25 4.83<br />
Bundle Strength (g/tex) 25 25.1<br />
Uniformity Index (%) 25 82.4<br />
Samrat Bt<br />
(CICR-H Bt Cotton 63)<br />
Jassid/Leaf hopper (No. / 3 leaf) 16 3.69 (BETL)<br />
Thrips (No. / 3 leaf) 16 6.97 (BETL)<br />
Whitefly (No. / 3 leaf) 16 1.4 (BETL)<br />
Pink bollworm (no./10 bolls) 11 0.98 (BETL)<br />
Helicoverpa armigera (no. per 5 plants) 12 0 (BETL)<br />
Erias vittella (no. per 5 plants) 12 0 (BETL)<br />
Spodoptera litura (no. per 5 plants) 12 0 (BETL)<br />
Bacterial leaf blight (PDI) 7 6.83 (R)<br />
Response Alternaria leaf blight (PDI) 8 25.58 (MR)<br />
against<br />
diseases Rust (PDI) 6 16.74 (R)<br />
Grey mildew 7 8.45 (R)<br />
Note: BETL – Below economic threshold level; R- Resistant; MR – Moderately resistant;<br />
341 | Page Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
This variety was identified for release based on its exceptional performance in ICAR-AICRP<br />
on Cotton Trials for 3 years across locations. This variety was recommended in the 84 th meeting<br />
<strong>of</strong> Central Sub-Committee on Crop Standards, Notification and Release <strong>of</strong> Varieties for<br />
Agricultural Crops on 13 th July 2022 and consequently the variety was notified in the Official<br />
Gazette <strong>of</strong> Government <strong>of</strong> India via S.O. 4065(E) dated 31 st August 2022.<br />
Conclusion<br />
Field view, plant view, flower, green boll and open boll <strong>of</strong> the Bt variety – Samrat Bt<br />
This new Bt cotton variety (Samrat Bt) is a medium staple variety, tolerant to jassids (major<br />
sucking pest on cotton), early in maturity (140-150 days), suitable for HDPS and mechanized<br />
harvesting <strong>of</strong> cotton. It combines good tolerance to pest and diseases. With early maturity,<br />
Samrat Bt can help to Indian cotton farmers to escape from damage <strong>of</strong> pink bollworm, terminal<br />
drought stress and also provide an opportunity for taking up second crop. This new Bt variety<br />
can help cotton farmers in rainfed regions <strong>of</strong> south India achieve better productivity,<br />
pr<strong>of</strong>itability and sustainability <strong>of</strong> cotton production.<br />
References<br />
Kranthi, K. R. and Stone, G. D. 2020. Long-term impacts <strong>of</strong> Bt cotton in India. Nat. Plants.<br />
6(3): 188-196.<br />
Singh, S. B., Venugopalan, M. V., Santosh, H. B., Raghavendra, K. P. and Balasubramani, G.<br />
2021. Bt varieties for increasing cotton yields under rainfed ecosystem. Cotton Innovate.<br />
6(1): 1-3.<br />
ICAR-AICRP on Cotton Reports 2019-20, 2020-21 and 2021-22 available at<br />
http://aiccip.cicr.org.in/main_aiccip_reports.html<br />
Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance<br />
342 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
T3-05R-1029<br />
Characterization and Evaluation <strong>of</strong> Pigeon Pea Mini-Core Collection for<br />
Moisture Stress Tolerance Under Rainfed Condition<br />
K. Salini*, B. Sarkar, N. Sridhar, N. Jyothilakshmi, M.Vanaja, M. Maheswari and<br />
V. K. Singh<br />
ICAR-Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, Hyderabad, Telangana 500059, India<br />
*K.Salini@icar.gov.in<br />
Pigeon pea [Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.] is an important grain legume grown for its proteinrich<br />
seeds for human consumption, their ability to restore and maintain soil fertility by nitrogen<br />
fixation, and their suitability to fit very well into various cropping patterns. With climate<br />
change looming large and threatening agricultural production systems, the major emphasis is<br />
on the breeding <strong>of</strong> stress-tolerant crop varieties by utilizing genetic resources that may be better<br />
adapted to changing climatic conditions. The objective <strong>of</strong> the study was to identify the moisture<br />
stress tolerant accession among the mini-core collection <strong>of</strong> pigeon pea thereby genetic<br />
resources can be utilized for breeding for enhanced moisture stress tolerance.<br />
Methodology<br />
A total <strong>of</strong> 127 germplasm accessions <strong>of</strong> the mini-core collections <strong>of</strong> pigeon pea from ICRISAT<br />
were evaluated in rainfed conditions in Augmented Block Design at Hayathnagar Research<br />
Farm, ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad during 2018-19. Biometrical characters viz., days to 50%<br />
flowering, days to maturity, plant height (cm), number <strong>of</strong> branches, number <strong>of</strong> pods, pod weight<br />
(g), total biomass (g), harvest index and seed yield (g) were recorded. Physiological parameters<br />
like Soil Plant Analytical Development (SPAD) Chlorophyll Meter Reading, canopy<br />
temperature (SCMR) ( 0 C), net photosynthetic rate (µmolCO 2/m 2 /sec), stomatal conductance<br />
(mmol H2O/m 2 /sec), transpiration rate (cm/sec) and leaf temperature ( 0 C) were also recorded.<br />
Results<br />
In the mini-core collections, the days to 50% flowering ranged from 71 (ICP 14903) to 178<br />
(ICP 15109) with an average <strong>of</strong> 124 days. The days to maturity ranged from 113 (ICP 14819)<br />
to 233 (ICP 14801) with a mean <strong>of</strong> 183 days. The plant height ranged from 52.67 (ICP 11627)<br />
to 177.33 (ICP 10654) with an average value <strong>of</strong> 133.28 cm. The number <strong>of</strong> branches per plant<br />
ranged from 8 (ICP 11627) to 28 (ICP 10559) with an average <strong>of</strong> 17.06. The number <strong>of</strong> pods<br />
per plant ranged from 13 (ICP 14229) to 305 (ICP 7) with a mean <strong>of</strong> 72. Pod weight per plant<br />
ranged from 10.38 (ICP 14229) to 97.64 (ICP 10503) with an average <strong>of</strong> 33.55 gm/plant. Seed<br />
yield per plant ranged from 7.3 (ICP 15161) to 58 (ICP 7057) with an average <strong>of</strong> 22.18<br />
gm/plant. Total biomass ranged from 36.43 ((ICP 11627) to 233.8 (ICP 5142) with a mean <strong>of</strong><br />
343 | Page Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
119.59 gm/plant. Harvest index ranged from 15.14 (ICP 10477) to 24.81 (ICP 9750) with an<br />
average <strong>of</strong> 19%.<br />
Based on days to 50% flowering, the genotypes were grouped into different maturity groups.<br />
Extra short maturing genotypes (51-70 days) were absent in the mini-core collection. Thirteen<br />
genotypes were grouped into the category <strong>of</strong> short duration (71-100 days), 12 in short medium<br />
duration (101-110 days), 79 in medium duration (111-140 days), 18 in medium-long duration<br />
(141-160 days) and five in long duration (>160 days). Upadhyaya et al., 2006 evaluated core<br />
and mini-core collection <strong>of</strong> pigeon pea for traits associated with drought tolerance under<br />
terminal drought stress conditions and earliness was used as characters for screening for<br />
drought tolerance.<br />
The promising accessions were identified for different characters. The accessions ICP10654,<br />
ICP4903, ICP7869, ICP12596, ICP10559, ICP9414, ICP9691, ICP8757, ICP1273 and<br />
ICP8602 recorded plant height <strong>of</strong> more than 153 cm. The highest number <strong>of</strong> primary branches<br />
per plant (>25) was observed in the accessions ICP10559, ICP12596, ICP7076, ICP12298,<br />
ICP9336, ICP9750, ICP4392, ICP4167and ICP6859. The accessions ICP7, ICP14444,<br />
ICP3049, ICP15493, ICP12142, ICP9691, ICP7223, ICP5863, ICP995, ICP6128 and ICP 939<br />
recorded more than 140 pods per plant. Higher pod weight (>55g/plant) was observed in<br />
accessions ICP10503, ICP7057, ICP6971, ICP6929, ICP12142, ICP7, ICP6992, ICP6370,<br />
ICP6049, ICP8152 and ICP 5863. High-yielding accessions (>35g/plant) were ICP7057,<br />
ICP12142, ICP7, ICP10503, ICP4307, ICP6929, ICP3049, ICP6971, ICP5142 and ICP6992.<br />
The accessions ICP5142, ICP11477, ICP6815, ICP5863, ICP13577, ICP6971, ICP6370,<br />
ICP10559, ICP11823, ICP12596 and ICP 7 recorded total biomass <strong>of</strong> more than 200g/plant.<br />
Higher harvest index (>20%) was recorded in accessions ICP9750, ICP9691, ICP9336,<br />
ICP10228, ICP8949, ICP12298, ICP13633, ICP14147, ICP12680, ICP12410 and ICP 8949.<br />
Choudhary et al., 2011 concluded that agronomic traits such as pods/plant and seed yield/plant<br />
under actual water deficit condition should be given much importance while breeding for<br />
drought resistance in pigeon pea.<br />
Physiological characterization <strong>of</strong> mini-core collection revealed that SCMR ranged from 43.27<br />
(ICP 6370) to 68.07 (ICP 4029) with an average value <strong>of</strong> 51.23. The canopy temperature ranged<br />
from 31.13 (ICP 11477) to 39.73 (ICP 8266) with a mean <strong>of</strong> 34.21 0 C. The net photosynthetic<br />
rate ranged from 2.39 (ICP 10710 to 18.97 (ICP 15185) with a mean <strong>of</strong> 8.15 µmolCO2/m 2 /sec.<br />
The stomatal conductance ranged from 0.01 (ICP 7221) to 0.12 (ICP 6929) with an average <strong>of</strong><br />
0.05 mmol H2O/m 2 /sec. The transpiration rate ranged from 0.37 (ICP 7221) to 3.30 (ICP<br />
13577) with an average <strong>of</strong> 1.56 cm/sec. Leaf temperature ranged from 30.82 (ICP 7) to 32.90<br />
(ICP 1156) with a mean <strong>of</strong> 31.96 0 C.<br />
The genotypes ICP4029, ICP11543, ICP6123, ICP11627, ICP14701, ICP14444, ICP12142,<br />
ICP15109, ICP6992 and ICP3451 recorded SPAD values more than 55. Low canopy<br />
Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance<br />
344 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
temperatures (14 µmolCO2/m 2 /sec)<br />
was recorded in genotypes ICP15185, ICP13577, ICP11477, ICP13575, ICP6929, ICP1126,<br />
ICP2698, ICP11321, ICP13579 and ICP6370. The genotypes ICP6929, ICP13577, ICP4029,<br />
ICP348, ICP13579, ICP939, ICP3451, ICP13662, ICP8949, ICP11321, ICP14701 and<br />
ICP4307 recorded the highest stomatal conductance (>0.09 mmol H 2O/m 2 /sec). The Lower<br />
transpiration (
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Gene expressions play a pivotal role in achieving tolerance in plants under salinity stress.<br />
Several genes such as transcription factors, phospholipases, defense-related genes, etc.<br />
including the helicases are known to express under the influence <strong>of</strong> various abiotic stresses.<br />
The helicases are ubiquitous enzymes that catalyze the unwinding <strong>of</strong> DNA duplexes (DNA<br />
helicases) or RNA duplexes (RNA helicases). The constitutive expression <strong>of</strong> such genes can<br />
provide stress tolerance when overexpressed. PDH45, p68 and LecRLK homolog from Pisum<br />
sativum has been reported to provide salinity stress tolerance by overexpression in tobacco and<br />
rice plants (Tuteja et al. 2014; Passricha et al. 2020). RuvB helicase is a highly conserved,<br />
multifunctional, and essential enzyme, primarily involved in numerous mechanisms such as<br />
DNA damage repair, mitotic assembly, switching <strong>of</strong> histone variants, and assembly <strong>of</strong><br />
telomerase core complex. Several studies observed its upregulation in rice under salinity, cold,<br />
and heat stress. The presence <strong>of</strong> unique helicases and the upregulation <strong>of</strong> their transcripts under<br />
abiotic stress conditions suggests their involvement in multiple cellular pathways. The present<br />
study aims to characterize RuvB helicase and identify its potential proteins that might play a<br />
role in imparting tolerance against salt stress in transgenic pigeon peas with the RuvB gene<br />
from Oryza sativa under a constitutive promoter.<br />
Methodology<br />
The sequence <strong>of</strong> the RuvB-like genes from Oryza sativa was retrieved in the FASTA format<br />
from the Rice Annotation Project Database. The Gene Structure Display Server<br />
(http://gsds.gao-lab.org/) and Fegensh+ were used to determine the gene structure. Protein<br />
family, Domain, DNA/RNA/Protein binding sites, and conserved regions were predicted using<br />
CDD, Predictprotein, and Pfam. The Swiss Model was used for structure prediction. QMEAN,<br />
SAVES, molprobity, etc. were further used for structure assessment, optimization, and<br />
verification <strong>of</strong> the predicted models. Interacting protein partners were predicted using the<br />
String database.<br />
Results<br />
The sequence <strong>of</strong> the RuvB-like genes from Oryza sativa with locus ID Os01g0837500 was<br />
retrieved in the FASTA format. Fegensh+ predicted protein coding sequence at the minus<br />
strand. The sequence contains both 3’ and 5’ UTR regions and 14 exons. Heat, cold, and salt<br />
tolerance was associated with trait ontology and the highest expression <strong>of</strong> the gene has been<br />
identified in inflorescence, ovary, and pistil by the RAP-DB. The expression <strong>of</strong> the gene was<br />
also identified in the leaf blade as well as in the endosperm. DNA binding (from amino acid<br />
residues 1-15, 63-67, and 218-224), RNA binding (from amino acid residues 2-13 and 219-<br />
223), and Protein binding (from amino acid residues 9-14, 295-297 and 427-429) sites were<br />
predicted using Predictprotein. The possible role <strong>of</strong> OsRuvb is predicted biological processes<br />
like Organic cyclic compound, cellular aromatic compound, and heterocycle metabolic<br />
Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance<br />
346 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
process. 42.97% <strong>of</strong> the amino acid were predicted as buried by Predictprotein. Conserved<br />
Domain Database (CDD) predicted that OsRuvb protein belongs to AAA+ ATPase family and<br />
TIP49 (TBP interacting) superfamily. Human RuvB-like helicase (PDB-Id: 2C9O) with 99%<br />
query coverage and 73% sequence identity was selected as a template. Swiss model was used<br />
for the homology modeling <strong>of</strong> OsRuvB and the model with minimum energy -13955 KJ and<br />
RMSD <strong>of</strong> 0.134 Angstroms was selected for further studies. OsRuvB’s COGs functional<br />
partners were identified as auxillary units <strong>of</strong> IIF (transcription initiation factor), and Nop<br />
domain <strong>of</strong> Prp31 (RNA processing factor). One <strong>of</strong> the functional partners listed was the stressresponsive<br />
gene 6 protein (Srg6). The COGs also highlighted the possible role <strong>of</strong> OsRuvB in<br />
chromatin remodeling, histone acetyltransferase activity, and methylated histone binding.<br />
Conclusion<br />
OsRuvB is DNA helicase that expresses in the leaf blade vegetative and endosperm, this might<br />
help plant under salt stress during germination as well. The highest expression <strong>of</strong> the gene in<br />
inflorescence, pistil, and ovary lead to higher productivity <strong>of</strong> transgenic pigeon pea. The<br />
possible role <strong>of</strong> OsRuvb is predicted in biological processes like Organic cyclic compounds,<br />
cellular aromatic compounds and heterocycle metabolic processes. OsRuvB’s COGs functional<br />
partners were identified as auxiliary units <strong>of</strong> IIF (transcription initiation factor), and Nop<br />
domain <strong>of</strong> Prp31 (RNA processing factor). This also highlighted the possible role <strong>of</strong> OsRuvB<br />
in chromatin remodeling, histone acetyltransferase activity, and methylated histone binding.<br />
The helicase might have a role in the unwinding <strong>of</strong> DNA for salt-responsive gene 6<br />
transcriptions. The transcriptomics study might shed light on the detailed mechanism for salt<br />
tolerance acquired by the transgenic pigeon pea containing the OsRuvB gene under a<br />
constitutive promoter.<br />
References<br />
FAO. 2020. Food and Agricultural Organisation <strong>of</strong> the United Nation. FAO statistical database.<br />
Tuteja, N., Banu, M. S. A., Huda, K. M. K., Gill, S. S., Jain, P., Pham, X. H., & Tuteja, R.<br />
2014. Pea p68, a DEAD-box helicase, provides salinity stress tolerance in transgenic<br />
tobacco by reducing oxidative stress and improving photosynthesis machinery. PloS one,<br />
9(5), e98287.<br />
Passricha, N., Saifi, S. K., Kharb, P. & Tuteja, N. 2020. Rice lectin receptor-like kinase<br />
provides salinity tolerance by ion homeostasis. Biotechnology and bioengineering,<br />
117(2), 498–510.<br />
347 | Page Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
T3-07R-1040<br />
Performance <strong>of</strong> Tamarind (Tamarindus indica L.) Accessions Under<br />
Dryland Conditions<br />
A.G.K. Reddy, M. Osman, S.K Yadav, N. Jyothi Laxmi, T.V. Prasad, Pushpanjali, K.<br />
Salini, K. Sreedevi Shanker, Vinod Kumar Singh and Jagati Yadagiri<br />
ICAR-Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, Hyderabad-500 059<br />
The purpose <strong>of</strong> this research was to evaluate the performance <strong>of</strong> tamarind (Tamarindus indica<br />
L.) accessions under dryland conditions. Tamarind popularly known as Imli is one <strong>of</strong> the<br />
auspicious, versatile trees in the Indian sub-continent and is particularly abundant in the States<br />
<strong>of</strong> Madhya Pradesh, Bihar, Andhra Pradesh, Telangana, Chhattisgarh, Karnataka, Tamil Nadu<br />
and West Bengal. Tamarind is an important cash crop in India and enjoys t h e sixth position<br />
in terms <strong>of</strong> export earnings. Tamarind tolerates high pH and is well suited to wastelands,<br />
drylands, saline and sodic soils. The trees act as a wind break in many areas and a re also<br />
suitable for drought prone areas. Tamarind thrives in a tropical climate with hot, dry summers<br />
and moderate winters. It can withstand drought but is prone to frost. Tamarind can be grown<br />
in almost all types <strong>of</strong> soil even on poor and margin soils, since; its life-span is long, deep loamy<br />
soils with adequate soil moisture holding capacity is ideal. The objectives <strong>of</strong> the study are (1)<br />
evaluation and characterization <strong>of</strong> tamarind germplasm as per the minimum descriptors (2)<br />
collection <strong>of</strong> tamarind germplasm from Telangana and Bastar plateau and identification <strong>of</strong> elite<br />
material and (3) to study the flowering and fruiting behaviour <strong>of</strong> the tamarind trees with<br />
reference to climatic conditions and soil parameters.<br />
Methodology<br />
The study was conducted at Hayatnagar Research Farm, ICAR-CRIDA Hyderabad from 2020<br />
to 2021 to record the flowering and fruiting characteristics <strong>of</strong> elite genotypes as well as a<br />
quality among the forty tamarind accessions kept at the research farm. The field trial was<br />
established in 1998 and evaluated during the fruiting season <strong>of</strong> 2020-2021 (22years aged<br />
plants). Three replications and 40 genotypes were used for the experiment, which has been<br />
arranged in a randomized block design. At a 5% level <strong>of</strong> probability, the significance <strong>of</strong> the<br />
mean was assessed using the Critical Differences (CD) test (Panse and Sukhatme,1985).<br />
Results<br />
The average number <strong>of</strong> inflorescences per branch Hasanur #5 accession recorded the highest<br />
value <strong>of</strong> 13.87 followed by NZB (S) (12.94), NTI-14 (12.72) and the lowest was noticed in<br />
SMG-7(7.4) followed by Urigam CT 164 (7.62). The average number <strong>of</strong> branches per tree in<br />
Hasanur #5 accession recorded the highest value <strong>of</strong> 6.11 followed by NZB (S) (5.94), Salem<br />
Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance<br />
348 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
132 (5.92) and the lowest was noticed in SMG-7(3.21) followed by Urigam CT 164 (3.57).<br />
Average yield per plant (kg) NZB (S) accession recorded the highest value <strong>of</strong> 15.72 followed<br />
by Hasanur #5 (15.09) and the lowest was noticed in SMG-7 (2.47) followed by NTI-82 (5.74).<br />
The highest pulp weight per fruit was recorded in NZB (S) accessions (9.27 g) followed by<br />
Hasanur #5 (9.24 g). The lowest pulp weight was found in CMK-6 <strong>of</strong> 3.46g followed by<br />
Urigam CT 164 (3.53). Similarly, the highest fibre weight per fruit was recorded in NTI-42<br />
(0.81) followed by Vantoor (0.73) the lowest was noticed in NZB (S) (0.22) followed by Salem<br />
132 (0.24). Regarding seed characters, accession NZB (S) recorded the highest total number <strong>of</strong><br />
seeds per pod (10.78) which was the highest among forty tamarind accessions followed by<br />
Prathistan (10.54). The highest normal number <strong>of</strong> seeds per pod was recorded in NZB (S) (9.38)<br />
followed by Hasanur #5 (10.54) and the lowest was noticed in SMG-4 (4.27) followed by NTI<br />
-86 (4.75). The highest number <strong>of</strong> seeds damaged per pod was recorded in Hyd (local) (1.54)<br />
followed by NTI- 39 (1.53) and the lowest in NZB (S) (0.62) followed by Hasanur #5 (0.82).<br />
Conclusion<br />
Among the forty tamarind accessions evaluated, NZB(S), Hasanur#5, Salem132, NTI-14 and<br />
SMG–3 recorded the highest values in all the growth, pod and yield characters. NZB (S)<br />
recorded the highest number <strong>of</strong> flowers per inflorescence (14.62), Hasanur #5 recorded the<br />
highest number <strong>of</strong> inflorescence per branch (13.87). NZB (S) recorded the highest average fruit<br />
weight (g) (19.24), pulp weight per fruit (g) (9.27), Total seed per Pod (no’s) (10.78), Normal<br />
seed /pod (no’s) (9.38) compare to remaining all tamarind accessions and also NZB (S)<br />
recorded the lowest fibre weight per fruit (g) (0.22), Damaged seed per pod (no’s) (0.62).<br />
References<br />
Panse Vand, Sukhatme, P.V. 1985.Statistical Methods for Agricultural Workers. ICAR, New<br />
Delhi.<br />
T3-08R-1444<br />
Administering the Natural Genetic Diversity for Improving Stress<br />
Tolerance<br />
R.S. Telem 1 , W. Dipin 1 , N. Jyotsna 1 and Romila Akoijam 2<br />
1 Krishi Vigyan Kendra- Senapati, 795129, Manipur, India<br />
2 ICAR- RC for NEH Region, Manipur Centre, 795004, Lamphelpat, Imphal, India<br />
The modern agricultural system <strong>of</strong>ten compromises with the cost <strong>of</strong> biodiversity over the<br />
improvement in yield. This is because the plants have a diverse genetic functions and<br />
regulation systems. During the process <strong>of</strong> the domestication and continuous artificial selection,<br />
genetic variation in the wild cultivars has been vanish in many present-day crop cultivars.<br />
349 | Page Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Breeding <strong>of</strong> crops chosen yield over other attributes such as stress tolerance, which could be<br />
restored under farmers’ supervision and other agricultural methods. Therefore, when compared<br />
to the present-day crop varieties, wild cultivars <strong>of</strong> crops could practically tolerate and survive<br />
under an extensive scale <strong>of</strong> weather variations and unfavorable habitats. Hence, the wild<br />
cultivars <strong>of</strong> different crop plants can be regarded as a principal pool <strong>of</strong> genetic diversity and it<br />
should be given more importance for exploration <strong>of</strong> their stress-tolerant characteristics. Besides<br />
the genetic resources from wild cultivars, genes from diverse plants such as extremophiles,<br />
which are adapted to utmost environmental situations, can also provide a collection for stresstolerant<br />
alleles. Hence, to obtain a more useful understanding <strong>of</strong> stress-tolerant characters<br />
available in naturally occurring stress-resistant plants, further relative studies between the<br />
present-day crops/model plants and crop progenitors/natural accessions/extremophiles are<br />
needed.<br />
Loss <strong>of</strong> stress tolerance during domestication<br />
Domestication <strong>of</strong> crops by artificial selection <strong>of</strong>ten arises in differences to natural selection.<br />
For example, farmers recommend the trait <strong>of</strong> non-shattering seeds, which is obviously a nonrecommendable<br />
character for plants in nature that they require to propagate their <strong>of</strong>fspring. The<br />
breeding plans mostly target to evolve high yielding crop varieties. Thus, domestication has<br />
outcome in growth <strong>of</strong> productivity but restricted genetic diversity, frequently by losing helpful<br />
alleles such as stress-tolerant genes. During domestication procedure, useful characters can be<br />
lost by gene loss, changes in gene regulation, and gene activity modification (i.e., sequence<br />
variations in coding sequence).<br />
Alleles for stress tolerance<br />
Arabidopsis thaliana accessions (ecotypes) are largely dispersed to the different regions <strong>of</strong> the<br />
world, and this dispersal contributes to the genetic diversity <strong>of</strong> Arabidopsis that are pivotal for<br />
stress adaptation. Thus, genetic diversity among the Arabidopsis accessions give a helpful<br />
genetic model to discover both unique stress tolerance mechanisms and important stresstolerant<br />
alleles. For example, Jha et al. found a positive correlation between AtAVP1 transcript<br />
levels and salinity tolerance. In comparison to Col and C24, the Ler and Ws accessions<br />
exhibited higher transcript abundance <strong>of</strong> AtAVP1 in relation with higher salt stress tolerance.<br />
In the first place, rice is a chilling-sensitive crop obtained from tropical or sub-tropical regions<br />
<strong>of</strong> Asia. Rice cultivars comprises two subspecies, indica and japonica. When compared to<br />
indica, the japonica rice cultivars were rated to be more cold-tolerant and grow at higher<br />
altitudes and latitudes and temperate zones. Rice ecotypes include two major types, upland rice<br />
and lowland rice. Lowland rice grows on flooded soils, while upland rice grows on dry soil;<br />
therefore, upland rice cultivars are drought tolerant. In maize, the drought-responsive gene<br />
ZmDREB2.7 shows natural variations in corporation with drought tolerance. The<br />
Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance<br />
350 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
polymorphisms <strong>of</strong> DNA at the 50 untranslated regions <strong>of</strong> ZmDREB2.7 gene were shown to be<br />
essential in controlling the levels <strong>of</strong> drought tolerance in maize varieties.<br />
Polytrichastrum alpinum is a kind <strong>of</strong> polar moss that exist in the utmost environment in the<br />
Antarctic. Hence, a stress-responsive transcriptional co activator gene, multi-protein bridging<br />
factor1c (PaMBF1c), was segregated for comparison with Arabidopsis MBF1c (AtMBF1c).<br />
Earlier, the AtMBF1c gene was already recognised as a key regulator for thermo tolerance<br />
reactions and the AtMBF1c gene over expression improved heat tolerance in Arabidopsis.<br />
Transgenic Arabidopsis plants over expressing the PaMBF1c gene when compared with<br />
AtMBF1c over expressing Arabidopsis lines, both lines showed high tolerance to heat stress.<br />
Conclusion<br />
Of late, many researchers detailed the application <strong>of</strong> the genetic resources from wild crop<br />
progenitors/relatives and extremophiles and authenticated many <strong>of</strong> them to be better alleles<br />
than alleles from model plants in crop improvement against abiotic stresses. Hence, it would<br />
be required to broaden our efforts to realize the natural genetic variations in the wild<br />
progenitors or accessions which are able to adapt in the extreme environments. To know the<br />
significance <strong>of</strong> their stress-eluding strategies will allow us to plan and design the breeding and<br />
biotechnological programs to develop crop plants with varied stress tolerance ability. An<br />
important thing to be noted here is that the natural occurring genetic resources might have not<br />
been selected during domestication process due to its deleterious effects on yield. Therefore,<br />
detailed depiction <strong>of</strong> the “superior” alleles must be executed to avert any compromise <strong>of</strong> yield<br />
in crop improvement.<br />
T3-09R-1356<br />
Effect <strong>of</strong> Different Weed Control Management Practices on Kharif French<br />
Bean<br />
K.A. Chavan*, V. P. Suryavanshi, B. V. Asewar, S. V. Thombre and S. G. Mane<br />
*College <strong>of</strong> agriculture, Latur, Maharashtra, India,<br />
VNMKV Parbhani, Maharashtra, India.<br />
* chavank1903@gmail.com<br />
French bean is short duration high yielding grain legume crop and it can be used both as pulse<br />
and vegetable. French bean is important source <strong>of</strong> protein calories in human diet. It has very<br />
high nutritional value containing 20.69 to 25.81% crude protein, 1.72% fats, 72.42%<br />
carbohydrates and 5.83 mg <strong>of</strong> iron. Among the major constraints, initial heavy infestation <strong>of</strong><br />
weeds is one <strong>of</strong> the important factors, which hinders its overall growth and productivity.<br />
Among the various weed management options herbicide use is not only efficient method but it<br />
351 | Page Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
is cost effective also. On the other hand, physical weed control measure viz. hand weeding are<br />
safe but labour intensive. Therefore, the present investigation on “Integrated weed management<br />
in Kharif French bean (Phaseolus vulgaris)” was undertaken for different weed control<br />
measures and their efficiency and economics in French bean.<br />
Methodology<br />
The field experiment was conducted during kharif 2018-19 at Farm <strong>of</strong> Agronomy section,<br />
College <strong>of</strong> Agriculture, Latur. The soil <strong>of</strong> experimental plot was low in available nitrogen<br />
(129.31 kg ha -1 ), medium in available phosphorus (20.42 kg ha -1 ), high in available potassium<br />
(460.00 kg ha -1 ) and alkaline (pH 8.1) in reaction. The experiment was laid out in Randomised<br />
block design with three replications and variety HPR-35 as a test crop along with seven<br />
treatments viz., T 1-Pendimethalin 30% EC @1.0 kg a.i.ha -1 (PE) , T 2- Quizal<strong>of</strong>op-p-ethyl 5%<br />
EC 100 g a.i. ha -1 at 20 DAS (POE), T3 -Pendimethalin 30% EC @1.0 kg a.i.ha -1 (PE) + One<br />
hoeing at 30 DAS, T 4 - Quizal<strong>of</strong>op-p- ethyl 5% EC 100 g a.i. ha -1 at 20 DAS + One hoeing at<br />
30 DAS, T5 - One hoeing followed by One hand weeding (farmers practice), T6- Weed free<br />
(Three hand weeding), T 7- Weedy check. The effect <strong>of</strong> treatments on yield parameters and<br />
cost economics with respect to French bean.<br />
Results<br />
Yield and economics: The seed yield <strong>of</strong> French bean was differed significantly due to different<br />
weed control treatments. The weed free treatment (T 6 ) recorded higher seed yield (950 kg ha -<br />
1 ) which was at par with treatment Pendimethalin 30% EC @ 1.0 kg a.i.ha -1 (PE) + One hoeing<br />
at 30 DAS (T 3) and Quizal<strong>of</strong>op-p-ethyl 5% EC 100 g a.i. ha -1 at 20 DAS + One hoeing at 30<br />
DAS (T4) and found significantly superior over rest <strong>of</strong> the treatments.<br />
Treatments<br />
T<br />
1<br />
- Pendimethalin 30% EC @1.0 kg a.i.ha -1<br />
(PE)<br />
T<br />
2<br />
- Quizal<strong>of</strong>op-p-ethyl 5% EC 100 g a.i. ha -<br />
1<br />
at 20 DAS (POE)<br />
Yield and economics<br />
Seed yield (kg<br />
ha -1 )<br />
Straw yield<br />
(kg ha -1 )<br />
GMR<br />
(Rs. ha -1 )<br />
NMR<br />
(Rs. ha -1 )<br />
B: C Ratio<br />
760 1956 76000 40845 2.16<br />
732 2161 73166 38167 2.09<br />
T - Pendimethalin 30% EC @1.0 kg a.i.ha -<br />
3<br />
1<br />
(PE) + One hoeing at 30 DAS<br />
T - Quizal<strong>of</strong>op-p- ethyl 5% EC 100 g a.i. ha -<br />
4 1 at 20 DAS + One hoeing at 30 DAS<br />
910 2476 91000 54850 2.52<br />
888 2427 88800 52857 2.47<br />
T - One hoeing followed by One hand<br />
5<br />
774 2048 77400 37643 1.95<br />
weeding (farmer practice)<br />
T - Weed free<br />
6<br />
950 2612 95000 45115 1.90<br />
Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance<br />
352 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
T<br />
7<br />
- Weedy check 559 1840 55900 22622 1.68<br />
S.E.± 37 152 3663 3663 0.10<br />
CD at 5% 113 469 11287 11287 0.31<br />
General Mean 796 2217 79609 41728 2.1<br />
The straw yield (kg ha -1 ) <strong>of</strong> French bean was differed significantly due to different weed<br />
control treatments. The weed free treatment (T 6 ) recorded significantly higher straw yield<br />
(2612 kg ha -1 ) which was at par with treatment Quizal<strong>of</strong>op-p-ethyl 5% EC 100 g a.i. ha -1 at<br />
20 DAS (POE) (T2), Pendimethalin 30% EC @ 1.0 kg a.i. ha -1 (PE) + One hoeing at 30 DAS<br />
(T 3) and Quizal<strong>of</strong>op-p-ethyl 5% EC 100 g a.i. ha -1 at 20 DAS + One hoeing at 30 DAS (T 4)<br />
which was found significantly superior over rest <strong>of</strong> the treatment.<br />
Mean gross monitory return <strong>of</strong> French bean was Rs.79609 ha -1 . The gross monetary return<br />
(Rs ha -1 ) <strong>of</strong> French bean was differed significantly due to different weed control treatments.<br />
The weed free treatment (T 6 ) recorded significantly maximum gross monetary (Rs 950000 ha -<br />
1 ) which was at par with Pendimethalin 30% EC @1.0 kg a.i. ha -1 (PE) + One hoeing at 30 DAS<br />
(T3) and Quizal<strong>of</strong>op-p-ethyl 5% EC 100 g a.i. ha -1 at 20 DAS + One hoeing at 30 DAS (T4)<br />
and found significantly superior over rest <strong>of</strong> the treatments.<br />
The mean net monetary return <strong>of</strong> French bean was Rs. 41728 ha -1 . The net monetary return<br />
was influenced by significantly due to different treatments. The application <strong>of</strong> Pendimethalin<br />
30% EC @1.0 kg a.i.ha -1 (PE) + One hoeing at 30 DAS (T 3) recorded significantly higher net<br />
monetary return Rs.54850 ha - 1 which was at par with Quizal<strong>of</strong>op-p-ethyl 5% EC 100 g a.i. ha -<br />
1<br />
at 20 DAS + One hoeing at 30 DAS (T 4) and weed free treatment (T 6) and found significantly<br />
superior over rest <strong>of</strong> the treatment. The application Pendimethalin 30% EC @ 1.0 kg a.i. ha -1<br />
(PE) + One hoeing at 30 DAS (T3) recorded higher B:C ratio (2.52) <strong>of</strong> French bean which was<br />
closely followed by Quizal<strong>of</strong>op-p-ethyl 5% EC 100 g a.i. ha -1 at 20 DAS + One hoeing at 30<br />
DAS (T 4) with B:C ratio 2.47.<br />
Conclusion<br />
Considering growth, yield, economics, it could be concluded that application <strong>of</strong> Pendimethalin<br />
30% EC @ 1.0 kg a.i. ha -1 (PE) + one hoeing at 30 DAS (T 3) or application <strong>of</strong> Quizal<strong>of</strong>op-pethyl<br />
5% EC @ 100 g a.i. ha -1 at 20DAS + one hoeing at 30 DAS (T4) were more effective in<br />
French bean.<br />
353 | Page Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
T3-10R-1220<br />
Integrated Pest Management Strategies for Fall Army Worm in Southern<br />
Telangana<br />
A. Ramakrishna Babu, Kasthuri Rajamani, P. Archana and M. Goverdan<br />
Regional Agricultural Research Station, Palem-509217, Pr<strong>of</strong>essor Jayashankar Telangana State<br />
Agricultural University, Telangana, India<br />
A recent invasive pest from African countries, the Fall Army Worm (FAW), Spodoptera<br />
frugiperda (J.E. Smith) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) has become a major pest in maize crop,<br />
cultivated across the globe. FAW is a polyphagous species that occurs on over 80 different host<br />
plants with maize as the primary host, and its incidence was reported on maize from Telangana<br />
State during the year 2018-19 (kharif, 3-60% and rabi, 30.8%). The voracious feeding and<br />
long-distance flight behaviors exhibited by the fall armyworm indicated a significant threat to<br />
agriculture with rapid dispersion throughout the hemisphere. The emergence <strong>of</strong> this notorious<br />
pest presents a major challenge to maize farmers, as well as national food security in India.<br />
FAW has the potential to cause yield loss <strong>of</strong> 8.3 to 20.6 M metric tons <strong>of</strong> maize annual<br />
production per year, to minimize these losses and to safeguard the modest gains made in<br />
securing the country’s food production, several actions have been undertaken by both farmers<br />
and scientists. The conventional chemical management strategies are sometimes inconsistent<br />
and <strong>of</strong>ten unsatisfactory to control the pest in maize. The use <strong>of</strong> insecticides as a pest<br />
management tool for small-scale farmers in Mahabubnagar district is more frequent and causes<br />
more damage to the ecosystem. To protect the environment, it is very important to follow<br />
integrated pest management (IPM) packages which are cost-effective for smallholder farmers<br />
in the region. An effective Integrated Pest Management (IPM) strategy for control <strong>of</strong> FAW will<br />
employ a variety <strong>of</strong> integrated approaches including biological control, cultural control, and<br />
safer pesticides, to protect the crop from economic injury while minimizing negative impacts<br />
on people, animals, and the environment. Keeping this in view, the present study was conducted<br />
to popularize IPM measures against FAW at farmers’ fields as Front-Line Demonstrations<br />
(FLD’s) during the kharif and rabi seasons <strong>of</strong> 2019-20 and 2020-21.<br />
Methodology<br />
The present study <strong>of</strong> front-line demonstration <strong>of</strong> integrated pest management <strong>of</strong> fall armyworm<br />
in maize was taken up by District Agricultural Advisory and Transfer <strong>of</strong> Technology Centres<br />
(DAATTCs), Mahabubnagar, Pr<strong>of</strong>essor Jayashankar Telangana State Agricultural University<br />
during kharif and rabi seasons <strong>of</strong> 2019-20 and 2020-21. The total demonstrations were<br />
conducted in seven locations covering seven villages in the Mahabubnagar district. The<br />
farming situation under the study area was sandy to sandy loam with low to medium soil<br />
Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance<br />
354 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
fertility status, besides well-irrigated sources. Further, conducted baseline survey before<br />
grounding the demonstrations to identify the issues related to maize production and also studied<br />
the socio-economic status <strong>of</strong> adopted farmers. The front-line demonstrations on Integrated Pest<br />
Management <strong>of</strong> fall armyworm in maize comprised cultural, mechanical, and chemical<br />
methods. At each location, the demonstration was laid out in an area <strong>of</strong> 0.4 ha and adjacent 0.4<br />
ha was considered as control (farmers’ practice) for comparison studies. Apart from<br />
showcasing the viability <strong>of</strong> pest management components, farmers were also sensitized on the<br />
relevance <strong>of</strong> these technologies by organizing awareness programs, focused group discussions,<br />
conducting method demonstrations and training programs.<br />
Results<br />
The results <strong>of</strong> front-line demonstrations on integrated pest management <strong>of</strong> fall armyworm in<br />
maize (Table 1 and 2) indicated that the pest incidence and damage due to FAW range was 8.4-<br />
14.0 percent in IPM followed plots during kharif 2019-20, whereas the average pest incidence<br />
was 11.44 percent. In the Non-IPM plots, it was found that the pest incidence ranged from 28.6<br />
to 36.4 percent and the average pest incidence was 32.6 percent. During rabi 2020-21, the FAW<br />
damage was very less compared to kharif season, and the damage range was 3.3 – 10.0 percent<br />
in IPM followed plots, whereas the average pest incidence was 6.98 percent. The Non-IPM<br />
plots showed that the pest incidence ranged from 13.3 to 23.1 percent, with an average pest<br />
incidence <strong>of</strong> 16.6 percent.<br />
Influence <strong>of</strong> FAW on maize yield and incidence during kharif, 2019-20<br />
S.No. Name Village / Manda; Yield<br />
(kg/ha)<br />
COC (Rs/ha) Gross returns B.C Ratio Pest incidence<br />
1. Mahipal Reddy Gurkunta<br />
/Nawabpet<br />
2. P.Shankaraiah Karkonda<br />
/Nawabpet<br />
3. Kosgi Chandraiah Nainonipalli/<br />
Nawabpet<br />
4 K.Anantaiah Venkatreddypalli<br />
/Gandeed<br />
Check Demo Check Demo Check Demo Check Demo Check Demo<br />
4725 4950<br />
(4.76%)<br />
4500 5125<br />
(13.89%)<br />
4875 5375<br />
(10.26%)<br />
5375 5775<br />
(7.44%)<br />
45500 38750 94500 99000 2.07 2.55 Moderate to<br />
severe,<br />
48000 47950 90000 125000 1.87 2.60 High<br />
incidence <strong>of</strong><br />
FAW<br />
57500 51250 80194 88419 1.39 1.72 High<br />
incidence <strong>of</strong><br />
FAW<br />
58750 55000 86000 92400 1.46 1.68 Severe<br />
incidence<br />
Average 4869 5306 52438 48238 87674 101205 2.58 2.23<br />
Low<br />
FAW<br />
FAW<br />
controlle<br />
d<br />
FAW<br />
controlle<br />
d<br />
FAW<br />
controlle<br />
d<br />
355 | Page Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
S.<br />
No<br />
Name<br />
1. Sudhaker<br />
Reddy<br />
2. Rajeshwar<br />
Reddy<br />
Influence <strong>of</strong> FAW on maize yield and incidence during rabi, 2020-21<br />
Village<br />
/Mandal<br />
Tirumalagiri<br />
/ gandeed<br />
Machanpally/<br />
mahabubnagar<br />
Yield<br />
(kg/ha)<br />
COC<br />
(Rs/ha)<br />
Gross returns B.C Ratio Pest incidence<br />
Demo Check Demo Check Demo Check Demo Check Demo Check<br />
5000<br />
(17.65%)<br />
5000<br />
(11.11%)<br />
3. Venkataih Buddaram /Hanwada 3250<br />
(8.33%)<br />
4250 62500 45000 88000 57200 1.40 1.27 Effectively<br />
controlled<br />
4500 50000 40000 88000 61600 1.76 1.54 Effectively<br />
controlled<br />
3000 45000 40000 52000 48000 1.15 1.2 Moderately<br />
controlled<br />
Average 4416 3250 52500 41666. 76000 55600 1.44 1.33<br />
Moderate to<br />
severe<br />
High incidence<br />
<strong>of</strong> FAW<br />
High incidence<br />
<strong>of</strong> FAW<br />
The data revealed yield differences among IPM strategies and Non-IPM practices on integrated<br />
pest management <strong>of</strong> fall armyworm in maize at farmers’ fields <strong>of</strong> Mahabubnagar district. The<br />
percent increase in yield in all the demonstration locations over farmers’ practice ranged from<br />
4.76 to 13.89 during kharif 2019-20, whereas the percent increase in yield varied 8.33 to 17.65<br />
percent rabi 2020-21 with the highest being recorded during rabi, compared to kharif season.<br />
There was an average yield increase <strong>of</strong> 9.09 and 12.36 percent during kharif 2019-20 and rabi<br />
2020-21, which clearly indicated that the adoption <strong>of</strong> IPM technology against fall armyworm<br />
in maize had a pr<strong>of</strong>ound influence on yield in both seasons. Lavakumar et al., (2019) reported<br />
from the southern part <strong>of</strong> Telangana has a substantial increase in maize grain production<br />
following the adoption <strong>of</strong> IPM protocol against fall armyworm. Thus cultivation <strong>of</strong> maize by<br />
IPM module is found economically prudent to suppress Spodoptera frugiperda (J.E. Smith)<br />
(Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) incidence to boost production.<br />
References<br />
Lavakumar, M., Omprakash, S., Rajinikanth, E., Saicharan, M., Lakshmisoujanya P. and<br />
Mallaiah, B. 2019. Management <strong>of</strong> Fall Army Worm on Maize in the State <strong>of</strong><br />
Telangana-An IPM Strategy Recommended. Trends in Biosciences 12(22), 1418-1421.<br />
Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance<br />
356 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
T3-11R-1009<br />
Performance <strong>of</strong> Pigeonpea (BDN 711) Under Rainfed Condition in Beed<br />
District <strong>of</strong> Maharashtra<br />
H.S. Garud 1 *, B.B. Gaikwad 2 , T.B. Surpam 2 and D.C. Patgaonkar 2<br />
1 Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Khamgaon Ta. Georai Dist. Beed<br />
Vasantrao Naik Marathwada Krishi Vidyapeeth, Parbhani 431 402 (MS), India<br />
*garudhanuman@gmail.com<br />
In India, particularly in Maharashtra region, for last few decades is facing severe problems <strong>of</strong><br />
drought due to vagaries <strong>of</strong> monsoon like late onset, early withdrawal, prolonged dry spell<br />
between two rains etc. As a result <strong>of</strong> this, crop failure due to lack <strong>of</strong> water availability has<br />
become a common phenomenon. Though pigeonpea is widely grown in Beed district, various<br />
factors influence the potential yield <strong>of</strong> the crop such as, faulty sowing practices, and lack <strong>of</strong><br />
knowledge about high yielding and disease resistant varieties. Lack <strong>of</strong> awareness about seed<br />
treatment with bi<strong>of</strong>ertilizers Rhizobium, PSB, Trichoderma viridae and improper management<br />
<strong>of</strong> pod borer. Above all in the district predominantly noticed problems for pigeonpea<br />
cultivation are high incidence <strong>of</strong> wilt and terminal drought condition. Hence drought tolerant<br />
variety appears to be major challenge to increasing productivity. With this background, Front<br />
line demonstrations were conducted to show the worth <strong>of</strong> high yielding and drought tolerant<br />
BDN 711 improved variety <strong>of</strong> pigeonpea.<br />
Methodology<br />
Technology demonstration on pigeonpea variety BDN 711 was conducted by Krishi Vigyan<br />
Kendra, Khamgaon during 2019-20, 2020-21 and 2021-22 in the district <strong>of</strong> Beed. A total 50<br />
number <strong>of</strong> demonstration was conducted in 20 ha area each year. In general, the soil <strong>of</strong> the area<br />
under study is medium to heavy and medium in fertility status. The component demonstration<br />
technology in pigeonpea was comprised i.e. university recommended improved variety BDN<br />
711 which was medium duration, escaping terminal drought and wilt resistant. In the<br />
demonstration, one control plot was also kept where farmer's practices were carried out. The<br />
demonstration was conducted to study the technology gap between the potential yield and<br />
demonstrated yield, the extension gap between demonstrated yield and yield under existing<br />
practice and the technology index. The yield data were collected from both the demonstration<br />
and farmer's practice by random crop cutting method and analyzed by using simple statistical<br />
tools. The percent increase yield, technology gap, extension gap and technology index were<br />
calculated by using the following formula as per Samui et al. (2000) as given below-<br />
Percent increase in yield =<br />
Demonstration yield – Farmers practice yield<br />
Farmers practice yield<br />
X 100<br />
357 | Page Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Technology gap = Potential yield - Demonstration yield<br />
Extension gap = Demonstration yield –Farmers practice plot yield<br />
Results<br />
Technology index (%) =<br />
Technology gap<br />
Potential yield X100<br />
Frontline demonstration studies were carried out in Beed district <strong>of</strong> Maharashtra state in<br />
kharifseason <strong>of</strong>2019-20 to 2021-22. The results revealed that in the demonstration on<br />
pigeonpea an average seed yield recorded 1660 kg ha -1 under demonstrated plots as compared<br />
to farmer's practice 1267 kg ha -1 . The highest seed yield in the demonstration plot was 1800 kg<br />
ha -1 during 2021-22. The average yield <strong>of</strong> pigeonpea increased by 31.11 per cent. These results<br />
indicated that the higher average seed yield in demonstration plots compared to farmer's<br />
practice due to integrated crop management practices and awareness <strong>of</strong> drought resistance <strong>of</strong><br />
BDN 711 variety.<br />
The extension gap observed during different years was 280, 350 and 550 kg ha -1 during 2019-<br />
20, 2020-21 and 2021-22 respectively. On an average, the extension gap observed in three<br />
years under FLD implemented villages was 393 kg ha -1 . The highest extension gap 550 kg ha -<br />
1<br />
was recorded in 2021-22 followed by 350 kg ha -1 (2020-21) and 280 kg ha -1 (2019-20). The<br />
technology gap observed during different years was 770, 450 and 400 kg ha -1 during 2019-20,<br />
2020-21 and 2021-22 respectively. On an average, the technology gap observed in three years<br />
under FLD implemented villages was 540 kg ha -1 . The highest technology gap 770 kg ha -1 was<br />
recorded in 2019-20 followed by 450 kg ha -1 (2020-21) and 280 kg ha -1 (2021-22).<br />
On an average, the technology index observed was 25.74 % for three years where front-line<br />
demonstrations were conducted. This shows the efficiency and effectiveness <strong>of</strong> the improved<br />
technologies. The cultivation <strong>of</strong> pigeonpea under improved technologies FLD gave higher net<br />
returns <strong>of</strong> Rs.57500, Rs. 78000 and Rs. 76400 per hectare as against to farmer's practices i.e.,<br />
Rs. 35500, Rs. 60800 and Rs 48750 per hectare during the years 2019-20, 2020-21 and 2021-<br />
22 respectively. The B:C ratio <strong>of</strong> pigeonpea observed during different years 2019-20, 2020-21<br />
and 2021-22 under improved cultivation practices were 1.90, 2.33 and 3.06 respectively while<br />
it was 1.61, 1.95 and 2.62under farmer's practice for the respective years. The highest B:C ratio<br />
in demo plots is because <strong>of</strong> higher yields obtained under improved technologies compared to<br />
farmer's practices during all three years.<br />
Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance<br />
358 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Yield, technology gap, extension gap and technology index in pigeonpea cultivation<br />
during 2019-20, 2020-21 and 2021-22.<br />
Year<br />
Potential<br />
yield (kg<br />
ha -1 )<br />
Average seed yield<br />
(kg ha -1 )<br />
Demo<br />
Farmers<br />
Practice<br />
Percent<br />
increase<br />
Technology<br />
gap (kg ha -1 )<br />
Extensio<br />
n gap<br />
(kg ha -1 )<br />
Technology<br />
index (%)<br />
2019-20 2200 1430 1150 24.34 770 280 35.00<br />
2020-21 2200 1750 1400 25.00 450 350 20.00<br />
2021-22 2200 1800 1250 44.00 400 550 22.22<br />
Mean 2200 1660 1267 31.11 540 393 25.74<br />
Economic impact <strong>of</strong> pigeonpea cultivated under FLD and Farmers' practice during<br />
2019-20, 2020-21 and 2021-22.<br />
Year<br />
No. <strong>of</strong><br />
Demo<br />
Area<br />
(ha)<br />
Gross income<br />
(Rs. ha -1 )<br />
Demo<br />
Farmers<br />
Practice<br />
Demo<br />
Net income<br />
(Rs. ha -1 )<br />
Farmers<br />
Practice<br />
Demo<br />
B: C Ratio<br />
Farmers<br />
Practice<br />
2019-20 50 20 75500 49500 57500 35500 1.90 1.61<br />
2020-21 50 20 105000 85800 78000 60800 2.33 1.95<br />
2021-22 50 20 113400 78750 76400 48750 3.06 2.62<br />
Mean 50 20 97967 71350 70633 48350 2.43 2.06<br />
Conclusion<br />
Pigeonpea variety BDN 711 gave higher seed yield, gross monetary returns, net monetary<br />
returns and B: C ratio under rainfed conditions over farmer's practice.<br />
References<br />
Samui, S.K., Maitra, S., Roy, D.K., Mandal, A.K., Saha, D. 2000. Evaluation <strong>of</strong> frontline<br />
demonstration on groundnut. J. Indian Society Costal Agricultural Research. 18<br />
(2):180-183.<br />
359 | Page Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
T3-11aR-1263<br />
Isolation and Quantitative Screening <strong>of</strong> Potential Fungal Isolates for<br />
Cellulase Activity<br />
Savitha Santosh 2 , Diksha Ramteke 1 , K. Velmourougane 1 , D. Blaise 1 , V. K. Singh 2<br />
1 ICAR – Central Institute for Cotton Research, Nagpur 440010<br />
2 ICAR-Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, Hyderabad 500059<br />
* savitha.santosh@icar.gov.in<br />
Plant biomass is an abundant renewable natural resource that can be transformed into chemical<br />
feedstocks and mostly made up <strong>of</strong> hemicelluloses, cellulose, lignin and a small amount <strong>of</strong><br />
protein and pectin depending on the source (Xu et al., 2018). Many microorganisms are capable<br />
<strong>of</strong> degrading and utilizing cellulose and hemicellulose as carbon and energy sources. The fungi<br />
represent the predominant group <strong>of</strong> organisms responsible for lignocelluloses degradation.<br />
Fungi have two types <strong>of</strong> extracellular enzymatic systems: the hydrolytic system, which<br />
produces hydrolases that are responsible for polysaccharide degradation; and a unique<br />
oxidative and extracellular ligninolytic system, which degrades lignin and opens phenyl rings.<br />
The cellulases are enzymes produced by cellulolytic microorganisms, which are essential for<br />
releasing fermentable sugars from lignocellulosic biomass. Enzymatic saccharification <strong>of</strong><br />
natural lignocellulose is required, and the use <strong>of</strong> cellulose-degrading enzymes becomes crucial<br />
when working with lignocellulosic substrates (Zhang et al., 2021). Endoglucanases (CMCase),<br />
exoglucanases (FPase), and β-glucosidases are the most relevant enzymes for cellulose<br />
degradation. Therefore, this study was carried out with an aim to isolate and quantify cellulase<br />
activity <strong>of</strong> potential fungal isolates.<br />
Methodology<br />
The soil samples were collected from seven different locations <strong>of</strong> Nagpur district, Maharashtra.<br />
The isolation <strong>of</strong> fungi was carried out by serial dilution and colonies growing over the medium<br />
were observed for their morphological characteristics and identified. The isolates were<br />
subjected to quantitative screening in submerged cultivations in Erlenmeyer flasks containing<br />
50 ml <strong>of</strong> basal medium [1.4 g/L (NH 4) 2SO 4, 2.0 g/L KH 2PO 4, 0.4 g/L CaCl 2, 0.3 g/L MgSO 4,<br />
1.56 mg/L MnSO 4.H 2O, 5.0 mg/L FeSO 4.7H 2O, 1.4 mg/L ZnSO 4.7H 2O and 2.0 mg/L CoCl 2<br />
containing 10.0 g/l <strong>of</strong> CMC (pH 5.0)]. After sterilization <strong>of</strong> the basal medium, the flasks were<br />
incubated with plugs (5 mm diameter) and the fungal mycelia were grown on medium and<br />
incubated at 30°C with shaking at 150 rpm. The crude enzyme was collected at different<br />
incubation days (7,14 and 21) using centrifugation at 10,000 rpm and 4°C for 15 min and<br />
analysed for Endoglucanase (CMCase), Exoglucanase (FPase) and β- glucosidase activity<br />
(Namnuch et al., 2021).<br />
Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance<br />
360 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Results<br />
The four fungal isolates (T1, T2, Bb1 and TV1) were isolated which produced cellulolytic<br />
enzymes in different quantities in Table. The T 1 isolate was the one with highest CMCase<br />
enzyme activity with 35.122 IU/ml after 21 days <strong>of</strong> incubation on the other hand, 19.36 IU/ml<br />
was observed for TV1 after 21 days <strong>of</strong> incubation which is least among all. With respect to β-<br />
glucosidase activity, T1 isolate produced highest enzyme activity (44.0 IU/ml). In case <strong>of</strong><br />
FPase activity, T 1 showed 27.7 IU/ml after 21 days <strong>of</strong> incubation enzymatic activity, being the<br />
best and Bb1 showed the least productivity <strong>of</strong> 20.4 IU/ml after 21 days <strong>of</strong> incubation.<br />
Cellulolytic activity <strong>of</strong> potential fungal isolates<br />
CMCase (IU/ml) Β-Glucosidase (IU/ml) FPase (IU/ml)<br />
7 days 14Days 21Days 7 days 14Days 21Days 7 days 14Days 21Days<br />
T1 2.303 7.557 35.122 40.8 73.6 44.0 23.6 25.6 27.7<br />
T2 1.822 6.447 19.360 22.9 33.5 24.0 12.5 22.7 23.1<br />
Bb1 2.858 2.081 31.422 9.2 10.4 11.5 4.7 11.7 20.4<br />
TV1 1.378 18.398 27.093 19.8 36.3 23.6 25.6 25.7 24.7<br />
Control 0.971 0.971 0.601 2.6 3.3 3.4 4.0 2.4 2.6<br />
Conclusion<br />
The fungal isolates have an enormous potential for utilization <strong>of</strong> cellulosic substrates, as they<br />
are the major group <strong>of</strong> microorganisms capable <strong>of</strong> synthesizing enzymes to degrade these<br />
substrates. The fungal isolates identified in the study would be valuable for effective cellulose<br />
degradation.<br />
References<br />
Namnuch, N., Thammasittirong, A. and Thammasittirong, S.N.R., 2021. Lignocellulose<br />
hydrolytic enzymes production by Aspergillus flavus KUB2 using submerged<br />
fermentation <strong>of</strong> sugarcane bagasse waste. Mycology, 12(2):119-127.<br />
Xu, R., Zhang, K., Liu, P., Han, H., Zhao, S., Kakade, A., Khan, A., Du, D., Li, X., 2018.<br />
Lignin depolymerization and utilization by bacteria. Bioresour. Technol., 269: 557–<br />
566.<br />
Zhang, Z., Shah, A.M., Mohamed, H., Tsiklauri, N. and Song, Y., 2021. Isolation and<br />
Screening <strong>of</strong> Microorganisms for the Effective Pretreatment <strong>of</strong> Lignocellulosic<br />
Agricultural Wastes. BioMed Res. Int., 2021: 514745.<br />
361 | Page Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
T3-12P-1433<br />
Yellow Revolution Success in Sodic Soil Through Salt Resistant Variety <strong>of</strong><br />
Mustard (CS-58)<br />
A.K. Srivastava, Naveen K. Singh and Ashutosh Srivastava<br />
Krishi Vigyan Kendra Pratapgarh- 229408, Uttar Pradesh, India<br />
Salinity and sodicity stresses affect an area <strong>of</strong> 932.2 million hectares in the world and an area<br />
<strong>of</strong> nearly 6.73 million hectares is affected by these stresses in India. This crop is <strong>of</strong>ten subject<br />
to saline stress, as it is grown extensively in arid and semi-arid regions <strong>of</strong> the world. Soil and<br />
water salinity stresses contribute to greater yield losses (both seed and oil yield), and this low<br />
economic yield is related to susceptibility <strong>of</strong> the crop. Hence, it is necessary to develop salttolerant<br />
genotypes in Indian mustard. CS-58 is a newly developed, salt-tolerant, high-yielding<br />
Indian mustard variety from ICAR- CSSRI, Karnal, to harness the yield potential <strong>of</strong> saltaffected<br />
soils <strong>of</strong> India. It produced 24-25% higher seed yield than the national check varieties<br />
Varuna and Kranti and was adopted by farmers in salt-affected areas. It grows up to a height<br />
<strong>of</strong> 180-185 cm. It matures in about 125-130 days and 1000 seed weight was 5.6-6.0 g. It is<br />
recommended for saline soils up to soil salinity level (ECe) up to 12.0 dS m -1 and in alkali soils<br />
upto pH 8.5-9.3. It is highly suitable for saline and sodic soil conditions. It yields around 39%<br />
oil content even under salt stress conditions. The yield potential in normal soils is 26-28 q ha -1<br />
and in salt affected soils (having pH up to 9.3 and soil salinity upto 9.0 dS m -1 ) is 22-24 q ha -1 .<br />
In NICRA village on the basis <strong>of</strong> five-year (2015-16 to 2020-21) demonstration conducted for<br />
saline conditions in NICRA village Chhachhamau, CS-58 provided a mean seed average yield<br />
<strong>of</strong> 2040 kg ha -1 under sodic condition (pH 8.5-9.0), which was 22-26% higher than the yields<br />
<strong>of</strong> check variety Varua. It gives higher yield at less cost, with less water requirements, and with<br />
more resilience to climatic stresses – are desirable and should be evaluated. Introduction <strong>of</strong><br />
mustard salt tolerant variety CS-58 plays a significant role in high pH condition.<br />
T3-13P-1253<br />
Weed Management Strategies under Different Tillage Systems in Wet<br />
Direct Seeded Rice<br />
P. Gayathri, Nimmy Jose, Jyothi Sara Jacob, A.K. Ambily and M. Surendran<br />
Rice Research Station, Moncompu, Kerala Agricultural University, 688502, Kerala, India<br />
The shift in the crop establishment method from transplanting to direct sowing is not gaining<br />
momentum among farming community due to the difficulties associated with the weed<br />
management in wet direct seeded rice (DSR). In wet DSR, weeds and seeds emerge at the same<br />
time and cause severe yield loss. As no weedicides can give broad spectrum management,<br />
Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance<br />
362 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
integration <strong>of</strong> cultural and chemical methods is required for effective management <strong>of</strong> weeds<br />
especially sedges in wet DSR. Conservation agriculture is a machine, herbicide and<br />
management driven agriculture with integrated weed management involving chemical and nonchemical<br />
methods for its success in the long-run (Sharma et al., 2014). In addressing weed<br />
control challenges, studies have shown that minimum and no-tillage reduce the weed<br />
population and also provide other ecosystem services like sustainable land management,<br />
environmental protection and climate change adaptation and mitigation (Sims et al., 2018).<br />
Unless weed management is sustainably addressed in conservation agriculture, particularly in<br />
the initial years, weed pressure, weed resistance and inherent crop yield losses may deter<br />
farmers from adopting conservation practices. With this background, this study was conducted<br />
to evaluate integrated weed management options for the effective management <strong>of</strong> weeds in<br />
rice, especially sedges which have become difficult to control in DSR.<br />
Methodology<br />
The experiment was conducted at Rice Research Station, Moncompu, Kerala Agricultural<br />
University, during the rabi 2021 -22 and kharif 2022, in split plot design with three main plots<br />
and five sub plots. The main plots were different land preparation practices viz., zero tillage<br />
followed by stale seed bed technique (SSB) and herbicide application to destroy the germinated<br />
weeds, tillage followed by SSB technique and herbicide application to destroy the germinated<br />
weeds, and tillage followed by SSB technique and destroying the germinated weeds again by<br />
tillage (repeated tillage). In the sub plots, various herbicides were evaluated for its effectiveness<br />
under different tillage conditions, viz., pre-emergence application <strong>of</strong> Pyrazosulfuron @ 0.02 kg<br />
ai/ha followed by post-emergence application <strong>of</strong> Penoxulam + Cyhal<strong>of</strong>op butyl @ 0.135 kg<br />
ai/ha, post-emergence application <strong>of</strong> Fenoxaprop ethyl @ 0.06 kg ai/ha followed by<br />
Metsulfuron methyl + Chlorimuron ethyl @ 0.004 kg ai/ha, post-emergence application <strong>of</strong><br />
Fenoxaprop ethyl @ 0.06 kg ai/ha followed by 2,4-D @ 1.00 kg ai/ha, two hand weedings and<br />
weedy check. The most popular rice variety <strong>of</strong> the region, Uma (MO 16) was used in the<br />
experiment. Observations on plant height, plant population, tiller count, total dry matter<br />
production, weed count and weed dry weight was recorded at 15, 30, 60, 80 and 110 DAS <strong>of</strong><br />
the crop. Grain and straw yield were also recorded at harvest.<br />
Results<br />
The results revealed that at 15 DAS, main plots, where land preparation was done by zero<br />
tillage followed by SSB with application <strong>of</strong> broad-spectrum herbicide to destroy the germinated<br />
weeds had significantly lower weed population followed by plots where land preparation was<br />
done by tillage followed by SSB with application <strong>of</strong> broad-spectrum herbicide. Significantly<br />
higher weed population was noticed in the treatment with tillage followed by SSB technique<br />
and destroying the germinated weeds by tillage (repeated tillage). At 30 DAS, plots where land<br />
363 | Page Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
was prepared by tillage followed by SSB with application <strong>of</strong> broad-spectrum herbicide had<br />
significantly lower weed population followed by zero tilled plots. Increase in weed population<br />
at 30 DAS in zero tilled plots compared to that at 15 DAS may be due to the increase in the<br />
germination <strong>of</strong> grass weeds from the soil surface, which is a problem in conservation<br />
agriculture. Species wise observation on weeds at 30 DAS clearly revealed the significantly<br />
higher populations <strong>of</strong> grass weeds in zero tilled plots followed by plots with repeated tillage<br />
and herbicide application. Giller et al., (2009) reported that small-seeded weeds that require<br />
light to break dormancy will likely become the dominant weed species in minimum and notillage<br />
systems, including in the first years <strong>of</strong> adoption <strong>of</strong> conservation agriculture. Population<br />
<strong>of</strong> broad-leaved weeds and sedges were significantly higher in repeated tillage than zero tilled<br />
plots both at 15 and 30 DAS. Repeatedly tilled plots recorded significantly higher total weed<br />
dry weight at 60 DAS.<br />
Various weed management strategies were adopted in the sub plots considering the severe<br />
infestation <strong>of</strong> weeds viz., Fimbristylis, Cyperus, Leptochloa, Echinochloa, Isachne,<br />
Monochoria, Lindernia and Ludwigia. Pre-emergence application <strong>of</strong> Pyrazosulfuron @ 0.02<br />
kg ai/ha at 3-5 DAS resulted in significantly lower weed population at 15 DAS in all sub plots<br />
irrespective <strong>of</strong> the main plots. Application <strong>of</strong> pre-emergent herbicide reduced the weed<br />
population by 70% compared to weedy check at 15 DAS. Singh et al. (2009) reported that<br />
application <strong>of</strong> pre and post–emergent herbicides is an effective solution for weed control in<br />
zero-tilled DSR either with residue or cover crops as it produced statistically similar yield to<br />
the puddled transplanted rice. At 30 DAS, weed population in all herbicide applied plots were<br />
on par with that <strong>of</strong> hand weeded plots. Total weed dry weight at 60 DAS in all the sub plots<br />
with herbicides were on par and significantly higher than hand weeding. In all the herbicide<br />
combinations evaluated, it was observed that sedges were the difficult-to-control weeds<br />
compared to broad leaved and grass weeds. There was 40% reduction in the total weed dry<br />
weight in the weedy check plots with zero tillage compared to that in repeated tillage which<br />
reveals the advantage <strong>of</strong> zero tillage in preventing weed seed germination.<br />
The interaction <strong>of</strong> main plot treatment with sub plots was also observed to be significant for<br />
various parameters under study. Comparison <strong>of</strong> yield in the different main plot treatments<br />
revealed superiority <strong>of</strong> zero tillage. Yield obtained in zero tilled plots was significantly higher<br />
than that in repeatedly tilled plots (tillage both at land preparation and after SSB). Eventhough<br />
the yield obtained from zero tilled plots was on par with plots with tillage (only at land<br />
preparation), significantly lower weed population in zero tilled plots will contribute to less soil<br />
seed bank enrichment than repeated tillage, which will be observed only after two or three<br />
cropping seasons. In all the main plots, the sub plots with pre-emergent herbicide application<br />
followed by post-emergent application gave significantly superior yield. This yield advantage<br />
Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance<br />
364 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
may be due initial reduction in weed population on application <strong>of</strong> pre-emergent herbicide<br />
compared to various combinations <strong>of</strong> post-emergent herbicides alone.<br />
Conclusion<br />
Land preparation with zero tillage followed by stale seed bed with the application <strong>of</strong> broadspectrum<br />
herbicide reduced the weed population by 40 per cent. Yield obtained in zero tilled<br />
plots was significantly higher than that in repeatedly tilled plots. Weeds during the crop season<br />
in the zero tilled field can be effectively managed by application <strong>of</strong> pre-emergent herbicide<br />
Pyrazosulfuron @ 0.02 kg ai/ha at 3-5 DAS followed by post-emergent herbicide Penoxulam<br />
+ Cyhal<strong>of</strong>op butyl @ 0.135 kg ai/ha at 18-20 DAS.<br />
References<br />
Giller K E.,Witter E., Corbeels M and Tittonell, P. 2009. Conservation agriculture and<br />
smallholder farming in Africa: The heretics’ view. Field Crops Res., 114: 23–34.<br />
Sharma A R., and Singh V P. 2014. Integrated weed management in conservation agriculture<br />
systems. Indian J. Weed Sci., 46(1): 23–30.<br />
Sims B., Corsi S., Gbehounou G., Kienzle J., Taguchi M. and Friedrich T. 2018. Sustainable<br />
Weed Management for Conservation Agriculture: Options for Smallholder Farmers.<br />
Agriculture. 8(8):118.<br />
T3-14P-1485<br />
Screening Potato Varieties and Advanced Clones for Maximizing Organic<br />
Tuber Productivity<br />
Pooja Mankar, Sanjay Rawal, S.K. Luthra, V.K. Gupta and Manoj Kumar<br />
ICAR- Central Potato Research Institute, Regional Station, Modipuram,<br />
Meerut (UP)-250110 India<br />
Potato is the fourth most important crop in world after rice, wheat, and maize, and is a major<br />
food crop which is consumed by over a billion people. It is identified as the future food and<br />
has immense potential for global as well as national food and nutritional food security. Potato<br />
production, area, and yield have increased by 34, 9.3, and 3.7 times, respectively over the past<br />
seven decades in the country. Now, India holds second position in potato production at global<br />
level as third advance estimate <strong>of</strong> 2021-22 has estimated that total production, area, and<br />
productivity <strong>of</strong> potato is around 54.2 m tonnes, 2.24 m ha and 2.4 t/ha, respectively<br />
(Anonymous, 2022). The prevailing domestic scenario <strong>of</strong> this crop requires diversified<br />
production strategy and further utilization in the national and international markets. One way<br />
may be organic potato cultivation which has good avenues for domestic and export markets.<br />
365 | Page Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Organic farming has gained significant attention and is developing as a dynamic ‘Alternate<br />
Farming System’. Key objective <strong>of</strong> organic production system is quality food production for<br />
humans and animals, while maintaining ecological balance and economic viability. Safety,<br />
protection, and conservation <strong>of</strong> the environment are the need <strong>of</strong> hour and organic cultivation<br />
practices ensure this. It is becoming popular in domestic and international markets as<br />
consumers are becoming more serious about food quality, especially chemical residues. This<br />
awareness and demand for quality food have created new market opportunities for farmers with<br />
premium selling prices and potato is no exception to all these trends. To meet the future<br />
challenges <strong>of</strong> increasing food demand, while simultaneously decreasing its environmental<br />
impact, efforts on increasing the performance <strong>of</strong> organic production systems, e.g., improving<br />
nutrient use efficiency are necessary. One <strong>of</strong> the major hurdles in organic potato production is<br />
the choice <strong>of</strong> variety as this is the major yield limiting factor. As per the National Standards for<br />
Organic Production (NSOP) norms, species and varieties cultivated under organic farming<br />
should be adapted to local soil and climatic conditions and should be resistant to pests and<br />
diseases. Genetic diversity should be taken into consideration while choosing a variety <strong>of</strong> crops<br />
to be taken in organic cultivation. Therefore, identification and development <strong>of</strong> varieties would<br />
play a very significant role in this direction. With this background, field experiments were<br />
conducted to screen the advanced clones better than newly released popular varieties for<br />
harnessing the potential <strong>of</strong> this crop in organic nutrition and have tuber yields comparable to<br />
the conventional inorganic system.<br />
Methodology<br />
Eighty-four advanced clones and varieties were evaluated in sandy loam soils <strong>of</strong> ICAR-CPRI<br />
RS, Modipuram research farm during 2019-21 in randomized block design having three<br />
replications. Potential genotypes were selected based on their productivity under organic<br />
nutrition and percent yield maintenance while comparing with the conventional inorganic<br />
system. These were evaluated in the field during subsequent crop seasons for their suitability<br />
under organic nutrition. Recommended packages <strong>of</strong> practices as per NPOP norms were<br />
followed for these genotypes to raise a successful crop. Planting was done in the last week <strong>of</strong><br />
October and the haulm cutting date varied due to different maturity periods (80-110 days) <strong>of</strong><br />
different genotypes. All observations related to emergence, growth and productivity were<br />
recorded as per the schedule during the crop season. Tuber harvesting and grading were done<br />
manually, and tubers <strong>of</strong> >20 mm size were considered marketable. Data from two crop seasons<br />
were pooled and analyzed using IRRISTAT statistical s<strong>of</strong>tware and inferences were drawn<br />
(IRRI, 1999).<br />
Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance<br />
366 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Results<br />
The marketable and total tuber number (000 ha -1 ) had significant variations among different<br />
genotypes, and also due to the source <strong>of</strong> nutrition. Interactions were also significant for<br />
marketable and total tuber number. Marketable and total tuber numbers decreased markedly in<br />
the organic system over inorganic nutrition. Alike, tuber numbers, marketable and total tuber<br />
yield (t ha -1 ) varied significantly among various genotypes and due to different nutritional<br />
approaches. Interaction effect for both the factors was also significant. Two main challenges<br />
i.e. disease and nutrient management have been identified in organic potato production (Finckh<br />
et al., 2006). Among all the screened clones and varieties, advanced hybrid MS/15-1001<br />
attained the highest mean marketable productivity (22.0) remaining comparable to hybrid<br />
HT/12-751 (19.2), MS/16-1156 (19.1) and CP4409 (18.0). Total tuber yield also followed a<br />
similar trend. Tuber dry matter content (%) was acceptable for the best-performing clones and<br />
was above 18%. Lombardo et al. (2012) also worked on similar lines and could identify two<br />
clones comparable to popular variety in Italy in terms <strong>of</strong> their higher total yield and nutritional<br />
value (total protein and vitamin C content) under organic cultivation system. Green manure at<br />
higher rates (400 and 200 Kg/ha) increased the accumulation <strong>of</strong> dry matter in potato above<br />
ground parts and tubers as observed by Mohamed et al. (2017). As compared to inorganic<br />
nutrition, better tuber dry matter content was observed in organic nutrition with better taste and<br />
flavour.<br />
Tuber yield (t/ha)<br />
30<br />
25<br />
20<br />
15<br />
10<br />
5<br />
0<br />
MS/15-1001<br />
HT/12-751<br />
CP 4409<br />
MS/16-1156<br />
MS/14-505<br />
MSP/17-07<br />
K. Lima<br />
MS/15-1422<br />
MCIP/17-89<br />
HT/MK-21<br />
MS/11-664<br />
MS/15-758<br />
K. Mohan<br />
K. Sangam<br />
HT/12-830<br />
MS/9-723<br />
K. FryOm<br />
MS/13-391<br />
MCIP/16-209<br />
K.Ganga<br />
MS/14-243<br />
MS/14-1381<br />
MCIP/9-11<br />
K. Chipsona-4<br />
K. Chipsona-3<br />
K. Lalit<br />
MS/9-2196<br />
K. Lauvkar<br />
MSP/16-300<br />
K Chipsona-1<br />
K. Thar-2<br />
MCIP/11-185<br />
MS/8-1148<br />
MS/13-527<br />
HT/MK-8<br />
K. Chandramukhi<br />
MP/12-105<br />
MSP/16-307<br />
MS/16-1157<br />
K. Neelkanth<br />
MS/15-1505<br />
ATL<br />
K. Karan<br />
K. Kiran<br />
Lady Rosetta<br />
MSH/14-7<br />
MS/16-375<br />
MSP/16-216<br />
MSP/15-60<br />
K. Pukhraj<br />
Marketable Non-marketable Dry matter (%)<br />
25<br />
20<br />
15<br />
10<br />
5<br />
0<br />
Tuber dry matter content(%)<br />
Yield performance <strong>of</strong> advanced clones and varieties during 2019-21 (Pooled means)<br />
Conclusion<br />
Screening and evaluation <strong>of</strong> potential advanced clones having wide base <strong>of</strong> parental lines can<br />
help in attaining sustainable potato yields in organic nutrition as some <strong>of</strong> the advanced hybrids<br />
like MS/15-1001, HT/12-751, CP4409 and MS/16-1156 have shown their yield and qualitative<br />
367 | Page Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
potential in comparison to popular new varieties like Kufri Lima, Kufri Lohit, Kufri Sangam,<br />
Kufri FryOm and Kufri Ganga.<br />
References<br />
Anonymous. 2022. Department <strong>of</strong> agriculture and farmers welfare. (https/ agricoop.nic.in/ en/<br />
statistics/ horticulture- crops- 2019- 20- second- advance- estimates, 10 November 2022).<br />
Mohamed E.M., Watthier M., Zanuncio J.C. and Santos R.H. 2017. Dry matter accumulation<br />
and potato productivity with green manure. Idesia, 35(1): 79-86.<br />
Lombardo S., Monaco A.L., Pandino G., Parisi B. and Mauromicale G. 2012. The phenology,<br />
yield and tuber composition <strong>of</strong> ‘early’ crop potatoes: A comparison between organic and<br />
conventional cultivation systems. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems, 28(1): 50-<br />
58.<br />
Finckh M.R., Schulte-Geldermann E. and Bruns C. 2006 Challenges to organic potato farming:<br />
Disease and nutrient management. Potato Research, 49: 27- 42.<br />
IRRI. 1999. IRRISTAT for windows version 4.0., Biometrics unit, IRRI, Los Banos,<br />
Philippines.<br />
T3-15P-1208<br />
Assessment <strong>of</strong> Performance <strong>of</strong> Drought Tolerant Rice Variety in Koshi region<br />
P.K. Chaudhary, M.K. Ray and M. Kumar<br />
Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Supaul, Krishi Vigyan Kendra Kishanganj, BAU Sabour.<br />
Rice is one <strong>of</strong> the main crop <strong>of</strong> Bihar but its productivity is very poor. More than 60% rice area<br />
is concentrated in Bihar in low productivity zone and this zone contributes more than 50% <strong>of</strong><br />
rice production <strong>of</strong> the State. Area coverage under rice with high yielding varieties is about 65%<br />
and irrigation facility is available for about 40% rice area in the State. If the productivity <strong>of</strong><br />
low productivity zone is increased, the rice production can be increased considerably without<br />
increasing the area under rice. Inspite <strong>of</strong> the good soil condition and plenty <strong>of</strong> critical natural<br />
resource i.e water the overall rice productivity and overall system productivity <strong>of</strong> the district<br />
are low. The productivity <strong>of</strong> major crops in the district is less that the state and national average<br />
except maize. In case <strong>of</strong> rice the productivity is very less and it is about 50 to 60 percent <strong>of</strong><br />
state and national average. The low productivity <strong>of</strong> rice has been observed due to unavailability<br />
<strong>of</strong> suitable, stress tolerant rice variety as per the land topography and delayed transplanting.<br />
This study has been focused on the performance <strong>of</strong> drought tolerant short duration paddy<br />
variety Sahbhagi dhan demonstrated in different year.<br />
Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance<br />
368 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Methodology<br />
This study was carried out in adopted villages <strong>of</strong> Krishi Vigyan Kendra (KVK) Supaul under<br />
NICRA project during kharif season in different year. The demonstrations on stress tolerant<br />
paddy variety Sahbhagi dhan were conducted in three different adopted villages i.e.<br />
Sadanandpur, Bishanpur and Besa <strong>of</strong> Supaul district in Bihar over the period. The Supaul<br />
district is situated adjust to Koshi river and the river flows across the district. This particular<br />
variety was chosen for demonstration because <strong>of</strong> suitability <strong>of</strong> soil and climatic condition. The<br />
performance <strong>of</strong> Sahbhagi dhan were compared with local variety known as Butraj. All the<br />
participating farmers were trained on various aspects <strong>of</strong> rice production technologies and<br />
recommended agronomic practices. The soil <strong>of</strong> demonstration site was slightly acidic in nature<br />
(pH-5.5 to 6.5) with sandy loam in texture. The normal annual rainfall <strong>of</strong> the district was 1344<br />
mm and more than 85% <strong>of</strong> it was received during rainy season. In year 2018-19 two dry spell<br />
<strong>of</strong> one week in the month <strong>of</strong> June and one dry spell <strong>of</strong> one week in the month <strong>of</strong> July and<br />
August each were observed. Whereas in year 2019-20, June months was almost dry and one<br />
week dry spell in July month was also observed. It is clearly visible that the most <strong>of</strong> the<br />
precipitation has been occurred during the rainy season from June to September during south<br />
west monsoon.<br />
Results<br />
The demonstrated paddy variety Sahbhagi dhan has shown stress tolerance capacity up to 10-<br />
15 days which is more than the local variety Bhutraj. The maximum yield obtained <strong>of</strong> Shabhagi<br />
was 34.0 q/ha in transplanted field where as the local variety maximum yield was less as 27.0<br />
q/ha. It has been observed that there is an increase in yield <strong>of</strong> 25 to 30 % during the study<br />
period.<br />
Yield performance and percentage yield increase<br />
Crop Year Demo<br />
Variety<br />
Demo yield<br />
(Q/ha)<br />
Check<br />
Variety<br />
Check<br />
(Q/ha)<br />
% increase<br />
Paddy 2016 Sahbhagi 34 Bhutraj 27 25.93<br />
Paddy 2017 Sahbhagi 32 Bhutraj 26 23.08<br />
Paddy 2018 Sahbhagi 34 Bhutraj 26 30.77<br />
Due the drought resistance performance <strong>of</strong> Sahbhagi dhan, the farmers are assured about yield.<br />
During the Kharif season <strong>of</strong> year 2018 there was two dry spell <strong>of</strong> one week in the month <strong>of</strong><br />
June and one dry spell <strong>of</strong> one week in the month <strong>of</strong> July but Sahbhagi dhan performed well and<br />
maintained the yield. However, in year 2017 slightly less yield were observed because <strong>of</strong><br />
submergence and loss <strong>of</strong> crop due to high precipitation in the month <strong>of</strong> July and August. In<br />
above table the highest yield increase <strong>of</strong> 30 % observed in year 2018. Whereas minimum yield<br />
369 | Page Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
increase <strong>of</strong> about 23 % observed in year 2017. Also, in year 2016 a significant increase in yield<br />
<strong>of</strong> about 26 % over conventional variety were observed. The average yield increase <strong>of</strong> 26.92<br />
percent was observed over the period.<br />
Year<br />
Demo<br />
Gross<br />
Cost<br />
Economic parameters <strong>of</strong> demonstration<br />
Demo<br />
Gross<br />
Return<br />
Demo<br />
Net<br />
Return<br />
Demo<br />
BCR<br />
Local<br />
Gross<br />
Cost<br />
Local<br />
Gross<br />
Return<br />
Local<br />
Net<br />
Return<br />
Local<br />
BCR<br />
2016 28000 54400 26400 1.94 25500 43200 17700 1.69<br />
2017 27000 51200 24201 1.89 26500 41600 15100 1.56<br />
2018 27000 59500 32500 2.2 25000 45500 20500 1.82<br />
A significant increase in net return and benefit cost ratio were observed in comparison <strong>of</strong> local<br />
variety over the period. In year 2018 the highest net returns <strong>of</strong> Rs. 32500.00 per hectare under<br />
demonstration was observed and it was about 58 % higher than the return from local variety<br />
which was Rs. 20500.00 per hectare. The benefit cost ratio <strong>of</strong> demonstration was also<br />
significantly higher than the local variety.<br />
Conclusion<br />
The above results revealed that the performance <strong>of</strong> demonstrated drought tolerant rice variety<br />
Sahbhagi Dhan was superior over the local variety Bhutraj due to the highly drought tolerant<br />
capacity and short duration with more productivity. The demonstrated variety Sahbhagi dhan<br />
was superior on all the major parameters. In Koshi region, Shabhagi dhan has shown its<br />
potential to dominate and replace the local variety because <strong>of</strong> higher yield and enhanced net<br />
return per hectare.<br />
T3-16P-1414<br />
Drought Tolerant and High Yielding Groundnut Varieties for Rainfed<br />
Ecosystem in Perambalur District<br />
M. Punithavathi, V. E. Nethaji Mariappn, P.Dominic Manoj and V. Sangeetha<br />
ICAR – Krishi Vigyan Kendra<br />
Hans Roever Campus, Valikandapuram, Perambalur District, Tamil Nadu - 621115<br />
kvk.perambalur@icar.gov.in; kvkroever@gmail.com<br />
Groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) is an important Oilseed crop mainly cultivated under rainfed<br />
condition in Perambalur district <strong>of</strong> Tamil Nadu. In present investigation, three Groundnut<br />
varieties namely Dharani, Co7 and TMV 7 were used to assess the drought tolerance and<br />
yielding potential. Erratic rainfall and frequent drought during the crop growth period,<br />
Groundnut yield are generally low under rainfed condition. Drought during the critical crop<br />
Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance<br />
370 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
growth stages are crucial for loss in yield <strong>of</strong> Groundnut varieties, but tolerant genotypes may<br />
give significant yield due to maintenance <strong>of</strong> physiological responses that were triggered during<br />
drought. In Perambalur district, On Farm Testing (OFT) was conducted by ICAR-Krishi<br />
Vigyan Kendra, Perambalur, Tamil Nadu, to assess suitable drought tolerant and high yielding<br />
Groundnut variety in terms <strong>of</strong> yield, acceptability and adoption potential during rabi 2020-21.<br />
The study revealed that Dharani recorded higher pod yield (2402 kg ha -1 ), high number <strong>of</strong> pods<br />
plant -1 (26) and optimum Plant population (26.3 plants m -2 ) as compared to farmers practice.<br />
The groundnut variety Dharani resulted in the highest shelling percentage (75%), while the<br />
lowest was registered with TMV 7 (71%). The Gross and Net returns were Rs. 1, 15,324 and<br />
Rs. 66,593 ha-1 respectively by cultivating Dharani as against Rs. 87, 523 and 41, 550 ha -1 in<br />
the check variety. Groundnut variety Dharani would be a better option for rainfed cultivation<br />
in Perambalur district <strong>of</strong> Tamil Nadu.<br />
T3-17P-1425<br />
Eco-Friendly Management <strong>of</strong> White Grub a Devastating Insect Pest <strong>of</strong><br />
Rainfed Agro- Ecosystem in Uttarakhand Hills<br />
Kamal K. Pande, Harish Chandra Joshi, Nawal Kishor Singh and Himanshu Bhatt<br />
Krishi Vigyan Kendra (ICAR-VPKAS), Kafligair- 263628, Bageshwar, Uttarakhand<br />
The Agriculture in the north western Indian Himalayan Hilly region is being practiced mostly<br />
by the marginal and resource poor farmers and they face several biotic and abiotic stresses due<br />
to the fragile ecosystem and harsh climatic conditions. In north western Himalaya majority <strong>of</strong><br />
areas comes under rainfed condition and cropped areas is under well drained sandy soil along<br />
hill slopes which is favourable for growth and development <strong>of</strong> white grubs so the white grub is<br />
a major challenge in rainfed agriculture. White grubs are polyphagous insect with cosmopolitan<br />
nature. A grub is the larval stage <strong>of</strong> scarab beetle. More than 75 species <strong>of</strong> white grub have<br />
been recorded in Uttarakhand but Anomala dimidiata, Holotrichia longipennis and Holotrichia<br />
seticollis have been reported as the dominant white grub species in this state. The grub damages<br />
the root <strong>of</strong> many cultivated field and vegetable crops, whereas their adult beetles cause severe<br />
defoliation <strong>of</strong> many fruit and forest trees. The damage caused by the grub under rainfed<br />
conditions may vary on an average 10-30 % to sometime complete crop failure. Several<br />
insecticides are recommended for the control <strong>of</strong> white grub, but in fact the insecticide does not<br />
satisfactory control unless used in very high doses, which in turn become hazardous and<br />
uneconomical besides being unsustainable. The adult beetles are attracted towards light, hence<br />
light traps were found to be effective tool for trapping <strong>of</strong> adult <strong>of</strong> white grub so ICAR-<br />
Vivekanand Patvatiya Krishi Anusandhan Sansthan, Almora designed and developed VL<br />
White Grub Beetle Trap -1. This technology is low cost, ec<strong>of</strong>riendly and provides long term<br />
integrated insect pest management. Therefore, this ec<strong>of</strong>riendly novel technology was<br />
371 | Page Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
demonstrated for the management <strong>of</strong> white grub beetle by installing VL White Grub Beetle<br />
Trap -1 at NICRA adopted village Karalapalari <strong>of</strong> KVK Bageshwar under TDC-National<br />
Innovations <strong>of</strong> Climate Resilient Agriculture (TDC- NICRA) project. Karalapalari is located<br />
in Kafligair Tehsil, 35 km away from district head quarter Bageshwar, Uttarakhand. In this<br />
village 64 households are present and the village is having 45.61 ha total geographical area and<br />
20.05 ha rainfed cultivated area.<br />
Methodology<br />
Before NICRA project intervention the farmers <strong>of</strong> this village were mostly unaware about the<br />
life cycle and management <strong>of</strong> the white grub. Therefore, awareness programme for the farmers<br />
were conducted to adopt VL White Grub Beetle Trap -1. The light traps were installed at<br />
strategic locations for the management <strong>of</strong> white grub beetles in village Karalapaladi. Data<br />
collection for the trapped white grub beetles was done at weekly interval for five months<br />
starting from June 2022 till October 2022 with the participation <strong>of</strong> farmers.<br />
Results<br />
Very encouraging results were found and 1.32 lakh beetle were trapped between June to Oct<br />
2022 in the first year <strong>of</strong> installation <strong>of</strong> VL White Grub Beetle Trap -1. The data also showed<br />
that maximum trapping <strong>of</strong> white grub beetles was concentrated from second week <strong>of</strong> July to<br />
third week <strong>of</strong> August. While in first week <strong>of</strong> June and last week <strong>of</strong> October, it was the<br />
minimum. It is projected that this trapping <strong>of</strong> beetles will consequently result in 80-90%<br />
reduction in grub population. This huge reduction in beetle and grub population will ultimately<br />
improve the rainfed agro- ecosystem in a sustainable manner.<br />
T3-18P-1285<br />
Effect <strong>of</strong> Crop Geometry on Growth and Yield under Direct Seeded Hybrid<br />
Rice (Oryza sativa l.) Cultivars<br />
Ajoy Das*, Sujan Biswas and Uday Narayan Das<br />
Dhaanyaganga Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Murshidabad, West Bengal<br />
* ajoydasblp92@gmail.com<br />
Rice (Oryza sativa L.) is one <strong>of</strong> the major staple food grains for more than 50% <strong>of</strong> the world’s<br />
population. The option <strong>of</strong> intensifying the area under rice in the near future is limited. The<br />
major challenge is to achieve this gain with less water, labor, and chemicals, thereby ensuring<br />
long-term sustainability. Depending on water and labor paucity, farmers are altering either their<br />
rice establishment methods from transplanting to direct seeding in unpuddled soil with<br />
adopting DSR, it is possible to save water. Among the cultural technologies, planting density<br />
is one <strong>of</strong> the important components, the manipulation <strong>of</strong> which is an essence for optimizing<br />
Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance<br />
372 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
yield. Improper spacing reduced yield up to 20-30% (IRRI, 1997). The optimum spacing<br />
ensures the plant to grow in both aerial and underground parts through efficient utilization <strong>of</strong><br />
solar radiation and nutrients (Khan et al., 2005). Therefore, an attempt was made to test the<br />
yield potential <strong>of</strong> five rice cultivars under direct-seeded conditions with narrow and wider<br />
spacing.<br />
Methodology<br />
The experiment was conducted during the Kharif season <strong>of</strong> 2021 at the experimental farm <strong>of</strong><br />
Dhaanyaganga Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Ramakrishna Mission Ashrama, Sargachi. The<br />
investigation was laid out in a split-plot design replicated thrice. The treatments comprised five<br />
cultivars (Arize 6444, PHB 71, PRH 10, MTU 7029 and HUR 105) assigned to main plots.<br />
Each main plot was further divided into two sub-plots to accommodate two crop geometry<br />
treatments i.e. 20 × 10 and 25 × 25 cm 2 . A herbicide mixture <strong>of</strong> bispyribac sodium @ 25g ha -1<br />
and Azimsulphuron @30 g ha -1 was also applied at 18 DAS to control weed flora. Plant height,<br />
number <strong>of</strong> tillers m -2 and dry matter accumulation m -1 running row, leaf area index among crop<br />
growth characters, yield attributing characters like panicle length, panicle weight, number <strong>of</strong><br />
effective tillers m -2 , number <strong>of</strong> grains panicle -1 and test weight. All the data obtained from the<br />
experiment were statistically analyzed using the F-test (Gomez and Gomez, 1984).<br />
Results<br />
Cultivars<br />
The maximum plant height and number <strong>of</strong> tillers m -2 were recorded in Arize 6444. It also had<br />
significantly higher dry matter accumulation m -1 running row and leaf area index than PHB 71,<br />
PRH 10, MTU 7029, and HUR 105. At 90 DAS, the plant height <strong>of</strong> PRH 10 was statistically<br />
at par with Arize 6444 and in the case <strong>of</strong> a number <strong>of</strong> tillers, m -2 Arize 6444 became statistically<br />
similar with PRH 10 and MTU 7029. In contrast, HUR 105 recorded lesser growth attributing<br />
characters. Yield attributing characters like panicle weight, number <strong>of</strong> effective tillers m -2 ,<br />
number <strong>of</strong> grains panicle -1 and test weight <strong>of</strong> Arize 6444 was significantly higher than other<br />
cultivars. Yield attributes in HUR 105 were lesser in most <strong>of</strong> the characters like panicle length,<br />
panicle weight, number <strong>of</strong> effective tillers m -2, and number <strong>of</strong> grains panicle -1 than the rest <strong>of</strong><br />
the cultivars. The minimum test weight was recorded in MTU 7029. Consequently, Arize 6444<br />
recorded the highest grain yield. The higher values <strong>of</strong> yield attributes recorded in Arize 6444<br />
than other cultivars were due to higher growth attributes and hybrid vigor.<br />
Spacing<br />
Square spacing (25 × 25 cm 2 ) recorded more plant height, dry matter accumulation, number <strong>of</strong><br />
tillers m -2 , and leaf area index in comparison to 20 × 10 cm 2 . Differences in plant height at both<br />
spacings were statistically at par. However, significantly higher dry matter accumulation m -1<br />
373 | Page Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
running row, the number <strong>of</strong> tillers m -2 , and leaf area index were recorded in square spacing (25<br />
× 25 cm 2 ) as compared to plant spacing (20 × 10 cm 2 ). In the case <strong>of</strong> yield attributing characters<br />
like panicle length, effective tillers m -2 , number <strong>of</strong> grains panicle -1 , and test weight were<br />
significantly higher at wider plant spacing (25 × 25 cm 2 ) as compared to narrow spacing (20 ×<br />
10 cm 2 ). As a result, grain yield was significantly higher in wider plant spacing (25 × 25 cm 2 )<br />
as compared to narrow spacing (20 × 10 cm 2 ). The improvement in the yield attributing<br />
characters and yield <strong>of</strong> Arize 6444 might be the result <strong>of</strong> better utilization <strong>of</strong> space, light, and<br />
other inputs mainly due to the reduced inter- and intra-plant competition which ultimately<br />
favored bolder grains at wider spacing transforming into grain yield.<br />
Conclusion<br />
Grain yield in cultivar Arize 6444 at 25 × 25 cm 2 and PHB 71 at 25 × 25 cm 2 was found superior<br />
to the rest <strong>of</strong> the cultivars. Rice hybrid Arize 6444 recorded significantly higher grain yield<br />
(56.14 q ha -1 ) compared to cultivar PHB 71 (53.16 q ha -1 ), MTU 7029 (51.23 q ha -1 ), PRH 10<br />
(51.02 q ha -1 ) and HUR 105 (42.67 q ha -1 ).<br />
Effect <strong>of</strong> cultivars and spacing on growth, yield attributing characters and yield in directseeded<br />
rice at 90 DAS<br />
Treatment<br />
Cultivar<br />
Plant<br />
height<br />
(cm)<br />
Dry<br />
matter<br />
m -1<br />
running<br />
row<br />
Number<br />
<strong>of</strong> tillers<br />
m -2<br />
Leaf<br />
area<br />
index<br />
(LAI)<br />
Panicle<br />
length<br />
(cm)<br />
Panicle<br />
weight<br />
(g)<br />
Effective<br />
tillers<br />
m -2<br />
No <strong>of</strong><br />
grains<br />
panicle -1<br />
Test<br />
weight<br />
(g)<br />
Yield<br />
(Kg ha -1 )<br />
Arize 6444 106.98 85.20 492.16 4.07 25.66 7.34 337.98 189.33 25.21 5614.90<br />
PHB 71 104.26 71.61 477.33 3.69 27.66 6.18 280.27 176.5 23.6 5361.30<br />
PRH 10 86.98 78.96 461.50 3.38 30 6.28 260.14 181.83 24.57 5102.50<br />
MTU 7029 64.65 73.49 486.83 3.75 22.16 6.03 288.13 154.17 18.38 5123.40<br />
HUR 105 83.61 64.02 456.16 3.40 20.83 5.61 238.24 145.83 20.96 4267.90<br />
SEm± 0.89 1.93 5.90 0.07 0.47 0.25 2.96 2.96 0.21 77.19<br />
CD 2.93 6.30 19.25 0.22 1.55 0.82 9.67 9.68 0.7 251.72<br />
Spacing (cm 2 )<br />
20 × 10 89.40 79.27 465.46 3.92 24.8 6.54 275.99 156.86 22.08 4978.69<br />
25 × 25 89.20 70.04 484.13 3.39 25.73 6.00 285.91 173.20 23 5209.29<br />
SEm± 0.37 0.60 19.25 0.04 0.11 0.16 2.65 1.66 0.18 43.21<br />
CD NS 1.91 18.33 0.14 0.36 0.53 8.37 5.24 0.57 133.00<br />
References<br />
Gomez, K. A., and Gomaz, A. A. 1984. Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research. J.<br />
Wiley and Sons, Singapore.<br />
Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance<br />
374 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
IRRI (International Rice Research Institute), 1997. Rice Production Manual, p: 95. UPLB, Los<br />
Banos, The Philippines.<br />
Khan, M.B., Yasir, T.A. and Aman, M. 2005. Growth and yield comparison <strong>of</strong> different linseed<br />
genotypes planted at different row spacing. Int. J. Agric. Biol., 7: 515–517.<br />
T3-19P-1045<br />
Evaluation <strong>of</strong> Bamboo Species Suitable for Southern Telangana Region<br />
G. Venkatesh, K. Sammi Reddy, K.A. Gopinath, V.K. Singh and R. Rejani<br />
ICAR-Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, Hyderabad- 500059<br />
Bamboos in India, is an exceptionally diverse plant group consisting <strong>of</strong> nearly 76 genera and<br />
136 species. It encompasses about 8.96 million hectares <strong>of</strong> forest area, which is equivalent to<br />
12.8 per cent <strong>of</strong> the total forest cover <strong>of</strong> the country. Bamboo is the fastest growing,<br />
multipurpose plant and has several advantages over tree species in-terms <strong>of</strong> sustainability;<br />
increase in green cover; provides various ecosystem services viz., carbon sequestration,<br />
preventing soil erosion and cultural rituals in rural areas (Kaushik et al. 2015; Tewari et al.<br />
2016). Bamboos have the potential to be incorporated into agr<strong>of</strong>orestry systems in the semiarid<br />
tropics in place <strong>of</strong> conventional tree species. The major user <strong>of</strong> bamboo in India is the<br />
paper industry. In addition, bamboo supports a number <strong>of</strong> traditional cottage industries,<br />
including production <strong>of</strong> handicrafts, incense sticks, and related articles. So far systematic<br />
research on bamboo has been carried out in high rainfall/irrigated areas. Very limited work on<br />
bamboo has been done in dryland/rainfed areas for evaluating the performance <strong>of</strong> bamboo<br />
species. For extending bamboo cultivation, species suitability need to be tested and evaluated<br />
for dryland areas <strong>of</strong> Southern Telangana for large scale promotion and adoption. The aim <strong>of</strong><br />
this study was to evaluate the growth performance <strong>of</strong> three bamboo species under rainfed<br />
Alfisols <strong>of</strong> Southern Telangana conditions.<br />
Methodology<br />
A field experiment was initiated at Hayatnagar Research Farm during 2021 with three bamboo<br />
species (germplasm resources <strong>of</strong> TFRI, Jabalpur) viz., Bambusa balcooa, Bambusa tulda and<br />
Bambusa nutans under rainfed Alfisol. The experiment was set up in randomized block design<br />
with four replications. For each species, 12 clumps (3 x 4; rows x clumps) per replication was<br />
established at 8 x 8 m spacing. Recommended dose <strong>of</strong> fertilizer (RDF) was applied as<br />
recommended by National bamboo Mission to the planted bamboo species. Bamboo species<br />
were planted during August, 2021.<br />
375 | Page Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Results<br />
Initial observations on culm height, collar diameter and number culms per species were<br />
recorded after planting. The survival <strong>of</strong> bamboo species was 100% at the end <strong>of</strong> one year.<br />
Performance <strong>of</strong> three bamboo species were observed for culm height, 5 th internode diameter<br />
and total no <strong>of</strong> culms. Among the three species, Bambusa nutans (99.21 cm) recorded higher<br />
average culm height followed by Bambusa balcooa (70.9 cm) and Bambusa tulda (61.4 cm);<br />
whereas Bambusa balcooa (0.80 cm) recorded higher average collar diameter (0.80 cm) and<br />
total no <strong>of</strong> culms (82) followed by Bambusa nutans (0.59 cm and 68, respectively) and<br />
Bambusa tulda (0.52 cm and 52, respectively) at end <strong>of</strong> 06 months after planting.<br />
Conclusion<br />
Preliminary results indicated that, all three bamboo species performed well under rainfed<br />
conditions.<br />
References<br />
Kaushik, S., Singh, Y.P., Kumar, D., Thapliyal, M and Barthwal, S. 2015. Bamboos in India,<br />
ENVIS Centre on Forestry, National Forest Library and Information Centre. Forest<br />
Research Institute, Dehradun, 326 pp.<br />
Tewari, R.K., Ram, A., Dev, I., Sridhar, K.B and Singh, R. 2016. Farmers’ friendly technique<br />
for multiplication <strong>of</strong> bamboo (Bambusa vulgaris). Current Science 111(5): 886–889.<br />
T3-20P-1218<br />
Evaluation <strong>of</strong> Different Herbicides in kharif Sweet Corn (Zea mays<br />
saccharata. L)<br />
S.B. Tambare, G.D. Gadade, S.U. Pawar and B.V. Asewar<br />
Vasantrao Naik Marathwada Krishi Vidyapeeth, Parbhani – 431402, Maharashtra.<br />
Sweet corn an excellent source <strong>of</strong> sugars, dietary fiber, vitamin-C, beta-carotene, niacin,<br />
calcium and potassium faces the problem <strong>of</strong> season-long weed competition which ultimately<br />
reflects into considerable yield loss. Weeds not only compete for light, water, nutrient and<br />
carbon dioxide but interfere with harvesting and increase the cost involved in crop production.<br />
Thus weeds in sweet corn reduce the green cob yield upto 56%. Weed management is a difficult<br />
task for kharif sweet corn due to slushy or hard field conditions that emerges as a result <strong>of</strong><br />
aberrations <strong>of</strong> monsoon and scarcity <strong>of</strong> labour. Under such circumstances chemical weed<br />
management is more feasible, less laborious, cost effective and economical in sweet corn.<br />
Studies reported that herbicides controlled 65-90% <strong>of</strong> weed flora and gave 100-150% more<br />
maize yield than weedy check (Nadeem et al. 2006). Taking into consideration the above facts,<br />
Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance<br />
376 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
the present investigation was undertaken with the objectives to study the effect <strong>of</strong> different preemergence<br />
and post-emergence herbicides on growth and yield <strong>of</strong> kharif sweet corn, weed<br />
control efficacy <strong>of</strong> different herbicides in kharif sweet corn and to work out the economics <strong>of</strong><br />
different treatments.<br />
Methodology<br />
The field experiment was conducted at research farm <strong>of</strong> AICRP on Irrigation Water<br />
Management, Vasantrao Naik Marathwada Krishi Vidyapeeth, Parbhani (MS) during kharif<br />
2021. The field experiment was laid out in randomized block design with eight treatments and<br />
replicated thrice. Treatment consisted <strong>of</strong> five different molecules <strong>of</strong> post emergence herbicides<br />
and for comparison one treatment each <strong>of</strong> pre-emergence herbicide, weedy check (unweeded<br />
control) and weed free treatment (2 Hand weeding). Seeds <strong>of</strong> sweet corn (Var. Sugar-75) were<br />
dibbled at the spacing <strong>of</strong> 60cm x 20cm on 29 June 2021. The recommended dose <strong>of</strong> NPK<br />
(150:75:75 NPK kg ha -1 ) and plant protection schedule was followed.<br />
Results<br />
The data furnished in Table revealed that green cob yield, GMR and NMR <strong>of</strong> sweet corn was<br />
significantly influenced by different weed management treatments. Weed free treatment (T 7)<br />
recorded significantly higher green cob yield and GMR <strong>of</strong> sweet corn, however it was<br />
comparable with application <strong>of</strong> PoE Mesotrione 2.27% w/w + Atrazine 22.7% w/w SC @ 875g<br />
a.i.ha -1 at 20-25 DAS (T 6), PE Atrazine @ 1 kg a.i. ha -1 + one hand weeding at 20 DAS (T 1)<br />
and PoE Tembotrione 34.4% SC 120g a.i.ha -1 at 20-25 DAS(T4). These findings are parallel<br />
with the earlier findings reported by Chhokar et al. (2019) wherein mesotrione and atrazine<br />
combination has synergistic effect, which ultimately helped in managing diverse weed flora in<br />
maize and enhancing its productivity. Due to cost effective weed management higher NMR<br />
was obtained in herbicidal treatments. Application <strong>of</strong> PoE Mesotrione 2.27% w/w + Atrazine<br />
22.7% w/w SC @ 875 g a.i.ha -1 at 20-25 DAS (T6) recorded significantly higher NMR and<br />
was at par with PE Atrazine @ 1 kg a.i. ha -1 + one hand weeding at 20 DAS (T 1), PoE<br />
Tembotrione 34.4% SC 120g a.i.ha -1 at 20-25 DAS (T4) and weed free treatment (T7). Similar<br />
trend was observed in respect <strong>of</strong> B:C ratio.<br />
Mean green cob yield, GMR and NMR <strong>of</strong> sweet corn as influenced by different weed<br />
management treatments<br />
Treatments<br />
T 1 : PE Atrazine @ 1 kg a.i. ha -1 + one hand<br />
weeding at 20 DAS<br />
Green cob<br />
yield (q ha -1 )<br />
GMR<br />
(Rs. ha -1 )<br />
NMR<br />
(Rs. ha -1 )<br />
B:C<br />
Ratio<br />
162.62 167417 109834 2.89<br />
377 | Page Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
T 2: PoE Topramezone @ 33.6 g a.i.ha -1 at 20-25<br />
DAS .<br />
141.11 146152 90036 2.60<br />
T 3: PoE 2,4-D @1.0 kg a.i. ha -1 at 20-25 DAS 133.96 141053 89895 2.76<br />
T 4: PoE Tembotrione 34.4% SC 120g a.i.ha -1 at 20-<br />
25 DAS<br />
T 5: PoE Halosulfuron methyl @ 67.5g a.i.ha -1 at<br />
20-25 DAS<br />
T 6: PoE Mesotrione 2.27% w/w + Atrazine 22.7%<br />
w/w SC @ 875g a.i.ha -1 at 20-25 DAS<br />
157.62 163151 108192 2.97<br />
129.89 137848 81216 2.43<br />
165.09 169217 113934 3.06<br />
T 7: Weed free ( 2 Hand weeding) 167.98 171864 109382 2.75<br />
T 8: Weedy check (Unweeded control) 74.75 85448 35965 1.73<br />
SE + 6.06 6664 5722 _<br />
C.D. (5%) 18.30 20121 17277 _<br />
General mean 141.63 147769 92307 2.65<br />
Conclusion<br />
Based on the present findings, it can be concluded that application <strong>of</strong> PoE herbicide Mesotrione<br />
2.27% w/w + Atrazine 22.7% w/w SC @ 875 g a.i.ha -1 at 20-25 DAS or PE Atrazine @ 1 kg<br />
a.i. ha -1 + one hand weeding at 20 DAS or PoE Tembotrione 34.4% SC 120g a.i.ha -1 at 20-25<br />
DAS was found pr<strong>of</strong>itable, cost effective and one <strong>of</strong> the good alternative options for hand<br />
weeding.<br />
References<br />
Chhokar, R.S., Sharma, R.K., Gill, S.C and Singh, R.K. 2019. Mesotrione and atrazine<br />
combination to control diverse weed flora in maize. Indian Journal <strong>of</strong> Weed Science.<br />
51(2): 145-150<br />
Nadeem, M.A., Tufail, M.S and Tahir, M. 2006. Effect <strong>of</strong> different herbicides on growth and<br />
yield <strong>of</strong> spring maize (Zea mays L.). In: International Symposium on Sustainable<br />
crop improvement and integrated management, Faisalabad. Proceedings. Faisalabad:<br />
University <strong>of</strong> Agriculture, 2006.<br />
Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance<br />
378 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
T3-21P-1420<br />
Evaluation <strong>of</strong> F3:4 Population for Seedling Stage Salinity Tolerance in Rice<br />
(Oryza sativa L.)<br />
M. Vani Praveena, P. Venkata Ramana Rao, B. Jyothi, Ch. Sreenivas and D. Ramesh<br />
Agricultural college, Bapatla, ANGRAU<br />
RARS, Maruteru-534122, ANGRAU<br />
ICAR-Indian Institute <strong>of</strong> Rice Research (ICAR-IIRR), Rajendranagar, Hyderbad-500030<br />
Rice (Oryza sativa L.) is most widely consumed cereal crop with its demand expected to<br />
increase by 38% within 30 years (Ali et al. 2013). With increasing world population, there is a<br />
necessity to increase overall grain production by 1.5% every year, requiring a 35% increase in<br />
production by 2030 and greater than 70% by 2050. Hence, improving rice productivity is<br />
critical to maintain economic growth, food security and sustainable production. However, the<br />
increasing trend in rice production is severely hampered by various abiotic stresses arising due<br />
to climate change and environmental variabilities. In crop plants drought, salinity and<br />
alkalinity, nutrient toxicity or deficiency, flooding and poor drainage, high or low soil pH, high<br />
and low temperatures and heavy metals are some <strong>of</strong> the important abiotic stresses arising due<br />
to environmental factors which are complex thus limiting the crop production globally. Among<br />
these, drought and salinity have high impact on rice productivity, salinity being second<br />
important abiotic stress in rice after drought. In India about 6.73 million hectares <strong>of</strong> land is saltaffected,<br />
<strong>of</strong> which 3.77 and 2.96 million hectares are sodic and saline soils respectively. Rice<br />
is most sensitive to soil salinity at both vegetative and reproductive stages. At the seedling<br />
stage, salinity causes poor rice crop establishment, shorter roots/shoots, and smaller leaves<br />
leading to early plant mortality. Therefore, understanding seedling stage salinity tolerance is<br />
very important for early plant establishment under saline stress which could help the plant to<br />
achieve good vegetative growth later. So, the objective <strong>of</strong> the present investigation is to<br />
evaluate F3:4 population for seedling stage salinity tolerance and to identify the tolerant lines.<br />
Methodology<br />
A total <strong>of</strong> 205 F 3:4 population with two parents i.e., MTU 1061 (salt tolerant) and MTU 1121<br />
(salt susceptible) were screened for salinity tolerance at seedling stage in greenhouse following<br />
the standard protocol <strong>of</strong> IRRI with some modifications (Gregorio et al., 1997). The screening<br />
experiment was conducted in a complete randomized design with 2 replications. Two pregerminated<br />
seeds <strong>of</strong> 205 F3:4 lines with parents (MTU 1061 and MTU 1121) and checks (MTU<br />
1010 and FL 478) were placed on the styr<strong>of</strong>oam seedling float. A total 24 styr<strong>of</strong>oam sheets<br />
were used for screening all the 204 F3:4 lines. The seedling floats were placed inside the<br />
greenhouse. Initially, the seedlings were grown in normal water for two days, followed by<br />
nutrient solution for following two days in Yoshida medium (Yoshida et al., 1976). When the<br />
379 | Page Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
seedlings were at two leaf stage, they were subjected to initial salinity stress <strong>of</strong> EC=6 dSm -1 by<br />
adding NaCl to nutrient solution and the pH was adjusted to 5.0. After eight days <strong>of</strong> initial<br />
salinization, the EC was increased to 12 dSm -1 . Initial scoring <strong>of</strong> the selected individual plants<br />
was recorded at 10 days after initial salinization as per SES <strong>of</strong> IRRI (1997). The description <strong>of</strong><br />
the standard evaluation score <strong>of</strong> 1 - 9 was presented in Table. The final score was recorded at<br />
16 days after initial salinization.<br />
Standard evaluation score (SES) <strong>of</strong> visual salt injury at seedling stage<br />
Score Observation Tolerance<br />
1 Normal growth, no leaf symptoms Highly tolerant<br />
3 Nearly normal growth, but leaf tips or few leaves whitish and rolled Tolerant<br />
5 Growth severely retarded, most leaves rolled; only a few are<br />
elongating<br />
Moderately Tolerant<br />
7 Complete cessation <strong>of</strong> growth; most leaves dry; some plants drying Susceptible<br />
9 Almost all plants dead or dying Highly susceptible<br />
Results<br />
F3:4 families were categorized according to standard evaluation scores recorded and presented in<br />
the Table 1 and Figure. In the present study, 204 F3:4 individuals derived from the cross between<br />
salt tolerant parent MTU1061 and salt susceptible parent MTU1121 were screened for salt<br />
tolerance at seedling stage following hydroponics system at two stress levels (EC=6 dS/m and<br />
EC=12 dS/m). Out <strong>of</strong> 204 genotypes screened for salt tolerance twelve genotypes showed tolerant<br />
reaction with SES <strong>of</strong> 3, forty-seven genotypes showed moderately tolerant reaction with a score <strong>of</strong><br />
5 and twenty-four genotypes showed highly susceptible reaction with a score <strong>of</strong> 9. More than<br />
hundred genotypes manifested susceptible reaction with salt evaluation score <strong>of</strong> 7. Salt tolerance is<br />
governed by multiple factors, tolerant reaction <strong>of</strong> the genotypes in this study might be attributed by<br />
mechanisms like tissue tolerance, ion exclusion, compartmentalization, activity <strong>of</strong> different growth<br />
regulators, transcriptional factors and several stress combating pathways (Krishnamurthy et al.,<br />
2020).<br />
Reaction <strong>of</strong> F 3:4 families against seedling stage salinity<br />
Score Count Salt tolerance<br />
3 12 Tolerant<br />
5 47 Moderately tolerant<br />
7 121 Moderately susceptible<br />
9 24 Highly susceptible<br />
Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance<br />
380 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
150<br />
Count<br />
100<br />
50<br />
0<br />
3 5<br />
Score<br />
7 9<br />
Graphical distribution <strong>of</strong> genotypes falling under different salt tolerance levels<br />
References<br />
Ali, S., Gautam, R.K., Mahajan, R., Krishnamurthy, S.L., Sharma, S.K., Singh, R.K. and<br />
Ismail, A.M., 2013. Stress indices and selectable traits in SALTOL QTL introgressed rice<br />
genotypes for reproductive stage tolerance to sodicity and salinity stresses. Field Crops<br />
Res., 154: 65-73.<br />
Gregoria, G.B., Senadhira, D. and Mendoza, R.D., 1997. Screening rice for salinity<br />
tolerance (No. 2169-2019-1605).<br />
Krishnamurthy, S.L., Pundir, P., Warraich, A.S., Rathor, S., Lokeshkumar, B.M., Singh, N.K.<br />
and Sharma, P.C., 2020. Introgressed saltol QTL lines improves the salinity tolerance in<br />
rice at seedling stage. Front. Plant Sci, 11: 833.<br />
Yoshida, S., Forno, D.A., Cock, J.K. and Gomez, K.A., 1976. Routine procedure for growing<br />
rice plants in culture solution. In: Laboratory manual for physiological studies <strong>of</strong> rice. 3rd<br />
edn. The International Rice Research Institute, Los Banos, Laguna, Philippines, pp 61–65.<br />
T3-22P-1543<br />
Evaluation <strong>of</strong> Newer Insecticides Against Safflower Aphid, Uroleucon<br />
Compositae (Theobald)<br />
S.M. Gangurde, P.S. Neharkar, S.D. Bantewad and P.R. Zanwar<br />
Department <strong>of</strong> Agricultural Entomology, Vasantrao Naik Marathwada Krishi Vidyapeeth,<br />
Parbhani-431 402 (M.S.) -India<br />
Safflower, Carthamus tinctorius Linn. is the most important oilseed crop growing in the rabi<br />
season. The safflower crop is damaged by as high as 79 insect pests. The safflower aphid<br />
(Uroleucon Compositae Theobald) is the regular and most destructive pest in India. Therefore,<br />
it is the most important pest <strong>of</strong> safflower. Safflower aphids can be controlled by different<br />
insecticides recommended by many workers. Thiamethoxam 25 WG @ 50, 70, and 100<br />
381 | Page Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
g.a.i./ha were found most effective than imidacloprid 17.8 SL and dimethoate 30 EC in<br />
reducing aphid population. Akashe et al. (2007) reported that thiamethoxam 0.005 percent was<br />
effective in the control <strong>of</strong> safflower aphids. The indiscriminate and frequent application <strong>of</strong><br />
insecticides has created resistance development in the target pest, the presence <strong>of</strong> pesticide<br />
residues in seed and oil, destruction <strong>of</strong> natural enemies and different pollinators. It was,<br />
therefore necessary to evaluate the efficacy <strong>of</strong> different seed treatment insecticides as well as<br />
foliar application <strong>of</strong> insecticides to find out the insecticides harmful to the aphids and safer to<br />
the natural enemies and pollinators, especially honeybees. Therefore, the seed treatment<br />
insecticides and newer insecticides were evaluated to manage safflower aphids.<br />
Methodology<br />
A field trial was carried out to test the efficacy <strong>of</strong> insecticides against safflower aphids during<br />
the rabi season <strong>of</strong> 2020-21 and 2021-22 at the Research Farm <strong>of</strong> the Department <strong>of</strong> Agricultural<br />
Entomology, Vasantrao Naik Marathwada Krishi Vidyapeeth, Parbhani. The Seed treatment<br />
with imidacloprid 48 FS and thiamethoxam 30 FS was done before sowing and soil drenching<br />
<strong>of</strong> clothianidin 50 WDG was done 15 days after sowing as per the treatment. The sowing <strong>of</strong><br />
safflower variety PBNS-12 was done in randomized block design with three replications by<br />
dibbling at a spacing <strong>of</strong> 45x20 cm. The first spray <strong>of</strong> insecticides was applied on the appearance<br />
<strong>of</strong> a sufficient population <strong>of</strong> safflower aphids while the second spray was given at an interval<br />
<strong>of</strong> 15 days as per the treatment. The observations on the number <strong>of</strong> aphids per 5 cm apical shoot<br />
length per plant were recorded a day before as a precount and 5, 7, 10, and 14 days after<br />
spraying <strong>of</strong> insecticide on five randomly selected plants from each plot. The seed yield <strong>of</strong><br />
safflower from each plot was recorded separately at harvesting and the data on aphid count and<br />
seed yield were statistically analyzed as per the method suggested by Panse and Sukhatme<br />
(1965).<br />
Sr.<br />
No.<br />
Treatment<br />
Treatment details<br />
Dose<br />
1 Seed treatment with imidacloprid 48 FS 9 ml/kg seed<br />
2 Seed treatment with thiamethoxam 30 FS 10 ml/kg seed<br />
3 Soil drenching with clothianidin 50 WDG 2.5 g/10 lit. water<br />
4 Seed treatment with imidacloprid 48 FS and one foliar spray<br />
<strong>of</strong> spinetoram11.70 SC<br />
5 Seed treatment with imidacloprid 48 FS and one foliar spray<br />
<strong>of</strong> cyantraniliprole 10.26 OD<br />
6 Seed treatment with thiamethoxam 30 FS and one foliar spray<br />
<strong>of</strong> spinetoram11.70 SC<br />
9 ml/kg seed and 420 ml/ha<br />
9 ml/kg seed and 900 ml/ha<br />
10 ml/kg seed and 420 ml/ha<br />
Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance<br />
382 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Results<br />
7 Seed treatment with thiamethoxam 30 FS and one foliar spray<br />
<strong>of</strong> cyantraniliprole 10.26 OD<br />
8 Soil drenching with clothianidin 50 WDG and one foliar spray<br />
<strong>of</strong> spinetoram11.70 SC<br />
9 Soil drenching with clothianidin 50 WDG and one foliar spray<br />
<strong>of</strong> cyantraniliprole 10.26 OD<br />
10 ml/kg seed and 900 ml/ha<br />
2.5 g/10 lit. water<br />
and 420 ml/ha<br />
2.5 g/10 lit. water<br />
and 900 ml/ha<br />
10 Two foliar sprays <strong>of</strong> spinetoram11.70 SC 420 ml/ha<br />
11 Two foliar sprays <strong>of</strong> cyantraniliprole 10.26 OD 900 ml/ha<br />
12 Untreated control --<br />
It is revealed from results that the minimum overall mean number <strong>of</strong> aphid population/5 cm<br />
apical shoot length/plant was recorded in the treatment with two foliar sprays <strong>of</strong><br />
spinetoram11.70 SC @ 420 ml/ha (9.93 aphids/ 5 cm apical shoot length/plant) which was at<br />
par with the treatment with two foliar sprays <strong>of</strong> cyantraniliprole 10.26 OD @ 900 ml/ha (11.22<br />
aphids/ 5 cm apical shoot length/plant). The next better treatment in order <strong>of</strong> efficacy were seed<br />
treatment with thiamethoxam 30 FS @ 10 ml/kg seed & one foliar spray <strong>of</strong> spinetoram11.70<br />
SC @ 420 ml/ha and seed treatment with thiamethoxam 30 FS @ 10 ml/kg seed & one foliar<br />
spray <strong>of</strong> cyantraniliprole 10.26 OD @ 900 ml/ha which were at par with each other by recording<br />
15.08 and 17.35 aphids/ 5 cm apical shoot length/plant, respectively. However, the treatments<br />
with seed treatment with imidacloprid 48 FS @ 9 ml/kg seed & one foliar spray <strong>of</strong><br />
spinetoram11.70 SC @ 420 ml/ha , seed treatment with imidacloprid 48 FS @ 9 ml/kg seed &<br />
one foliar spray <strong>of</strong> cyantraniliprole 10.26 OD @ 900 ml/ha, soil drenching with clothianidin<br />
50 WDG & one foliar spray <strong>of</strong> spinetoram11.70 SC and soil drenching with clothianidin 50<br />
WDG & one foliar spray <strong>of</strong> cyantraniliprole 10.26 OD which were at par with each other by<br />
recording 25.21, 27.21, 29.94 and 31.96 aphids/ 5 cm apical shoot length/plant, respectively.<br />
In an untreated control, higher population <strong>of</strong> 181.13 aphids/ 5 cm apical shoot length/plant was<br />
recorded.<br />
Seed yield: The results showed that the seed yield <strong>of</strong> safflower under all the treatments were<br />
significantly superior over untreated control. The treatment with two foliar sprays <strong>of</strong><br />
spinetoram11.70 SC @ 420 ml/ha was recorded highest seed yield <strong>of</strong> 14.63 q/ha which was at<br />
par with the treatment with two foliar sprays <strong>of</strong> cyantraniliprole 10.26 OD @ 900 ml/ha (14.24<br />
q/ha). The treatments with seed treatment with thiamethoxam 30 FS @ 10 ml/kg seed & one<br />
foliar spray <strong>of</strong> spinetoram11.70 SC @ 420 ml/ha and seed treatment with thiamethoxam 30 FS<br />
@ 10 ml/kg seed & one foliar spray <strong>of</strong> cyantraniliprole 10.26 OD @ 900 ml/ha which recorded<br />
12.91 and 12.56 q/ha seed yield, respectively. The next better treatments were seed treatment<br />
with imidacloprid 48 FS @ 9 ml/kg seed & one foliar spray <strong>of</strong> spinetoram11.70 SC @ 420<br />
ml/ha, seed treatment with imidacloprid 48 FS @ 9 ml/kg seed & one foliar spray <strong>of</strong><br />
383 | Page Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
cyantraniliprole 10.26 OD @ 900 ml/ha, soil drenching with clothianidin 50 WDG & one foliar<br />
spray <strong>of</strong> spinetoram11.70 SC and soil drenching with clothianidin 50 WDG & one foliar spray<br />
<strong>of</strong> cyantraniliprole 10.26 OD which recorded seed yield in the range <strong>of</strong> 9.82 to 11.56 q/ha.<br />
Conclusion<br />
The overall results on bio efficacy <strong>of</strong> insecticides revealed that the treatments with two foliar<br />
sprays <strong>of</strong> spinetoram 11.70 SC @ 420 ml/ha and the treatment with two foliar sprays <strong>of</strong><br />
cyantraniliprole 10.26 OD @ 900 ml/ha were found most effective for the control <strong>of</strong> safflower<br />
aphid and in obtaining higher seed yield.<br />
References<br />
Akashe, V.B., Ghadge, S.M., Gud, M.A., Kale, S.D., Kankal, V.Y. and Deshpande, A.N., 2007.<br />
Efficacy <strong>of</strong> some newer insecticides for the control <strong>of</strong> safflower aphid (Uroleucon<br />
compositae Theobald). In Abst.ISOR Nation Semi. January 29-31, pp.191-192.<br />
Panse, V.G. and Sukhatme, P.V., 1965. Statistical Methods for Agricultural Workers, ICAR,<br />
New Delhi.<br />
T3-23P-1191<br />
Evaluation <strong>of</strong> STRVs under Different Crop Establishment System in Rainfed<br />
Stress-Prone Upland Rice Ecosystem <strong>of</strong> Eastern Uttar Pradesh<br />
Kajal Verma* and U. P. Singh<br />
Institute <strong>of</strong> Agricultural sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, India-221005<br />
*kajal@bhu.ac.in<br />
Globally, rice (Oryza sativa L.) is one <strong>of</strong> the most important food grains. In India, out <strong>of</strong> 44 m<br />
ha <strong>of</strong> total rice producing area about 45 per cent is irrigated, 33 per cent is rainfed lowland, 15<br />
per cent is rainfed upland and 7 per cent is flood prone. As major portion (55 per cent) <strong>of</strong> rice<br />
producing area is rainfed, crop <strong>of</strong>ten suffers from a variety <strong>of</strong> stresses. In recent past, the area<br />
under rice has decreased due to increased cost on transplanting and weeding operations. At the<br />
same time, delay in transplanting due to labour shortage and non-availability <strong>of</strong> irrigation<br />
water at the peak period causes yield reduction and less pr<strong>of</strong>it (Gangwaret al., 2008). Hence,<br />
the major challenge is to mitigate the adverse effects <strong>of</strong> changing climate so that growth in<br />
rice production can be sustained and food security can be achieved. To increase the<br />
productivity <strong>of</strong> stress-prone ecosystems, a combination <strong>of</strong> improved varieties and crop<br />
management options that are more tolerant to volatile climate under stress-prone environment<br />
is necessary to ensure food security and at the same time provide viable incomes for resource<br />
poor rice farmers (Haefeleet al., 2010, Singh et al., 2014). As all stress tolerant rice varieties<br />
Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance<br />
384 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
(STRVs) do not perform same under different establishment systems, thus site-specific<br />
experimentation is required to evaluate explore their performance. Therefore, present research<br />
evaluated appropriate crop establishment and STRVs for better stress tolerance, enhanced<br />
yield stability and pr<strong>of</strong>itability under rainfed stress-prone environment.<br />
Methodology<br />
The present investigation was carried out at the Agricultural Research Farm, Institute <strong>of</strong><br />
Agricultural Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh during kharif season<br />
<strong>of</strong> 2017 and 2018 for evaluating the performance <strong>of</strong> STRVs under different crop establishment<br />
methods in rainfed upland ecosystem. The experiment consisted <strong>of</strong> two factors i.e. STRVs and<br />
crop establishment systems. Research trial was laid out in split-plot design with three crop<br />
establishment systems i.e. puddled transplanted, direct drill seeding on flat bed, direct seeding<br />
on furrow irrigated raised bed (FIRB) in main plots and five STRVs i.e. DRR42, DRR44,<br />
Sukha dhan5, Sukhadhan 6, Sarjoo 52 in sub plots and was replicated thrice. The allocation <strong>of</strong><br />
treatments was based on principles <strong>of</strong> randomization.<br />
Results<br />
Analysis showed that significantly higher growth and yield attributes was recorded in direct<br />
seeding on raised bed than with puddling method <strong>of</strong> crop establishment. Among different<br />
STRVs, better growth and yield attributes was recorded for DRR 44 followed by DRR 42,<br />
Sarjoo 52 and Sukhadhan 6 while minimum growth and yield attributes was recorded for<br />
Sukhadhan 5. Due to better moisture retention in direct seeding on raised bed, improvement in<br />
yield attributes occurred resulting in greater stress tolerance and higher yield. The highest net<br />
return and B:C for rice was also obtained from direct seeding on raised bed followed by direct<br />
drill seeding on flat and puddled transplanting as Higher cost was incurred for tillage operations<br />
under conventional system.<br />
400<br />
350<br />
300<br />
250<br />
200<br />
150<br />
100<br />
50<br />
No. <strong>of</strong> tillers per m2 at 90 DAS<br />
Dry matter accumulation at 90 DAS(g m-1)<br />
0<br />
Crop<br />
establishment<br />
systems (CE)<br />
CE1: Puddle<br />
transplanting<br />
CE2: Direct<br />
drill seeding on<br />
flat<br />
CE3: Direct<br />
seeding on<br />
raised bed<br />
(FIRB)<br />
Varieties<br />
(STRVs)<br />
V1: DRR 42 V2: DRR 44 V3: Sukha<br />
Dhan 5<br />
V4: Sukha<br />
Dhan 6<br />
V5: Sarjoo 52<br />
Influence <strong>of</strong> STRVs and crop establishment systems on growth attributes <strong>of</strong> rice under rainfed stressprone<br />
rice ecosystem<br />
385 | Page Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Conclusion<br />
Based on the results, it could be concluded that establishment <strong>of</strong> rice by direct seeding on raised<br />
bed/direct drill seeding on flat with stress tolerant rice varieties DRR 44/DRR42 would be<br />
useful inbetter stress tolerance and higher yield stability under rainfed stress-prone<br />
environment <strong>of</strong> eastern Uttar Pradesh.<br />
References<br />
Gangwar, K.S., Gill, M.S., Tomar O.K. and Pandey. D.K. Effect <strong>of</strong> crop establishment methods<br />
on growth, productivity and soil fertility <strong>of</strong> rice (Oryza sativa) - based cropping<br />
systems. Indian J.Agron., 53(2):102-106, 2008.<br />
Haefele, S.M., A.M. Ismail, D.E. Johnson, C. Vera Cruz and B. Samson. “Crop and Natural<br />
Resource Management for Climate-Ready Rice in Unfavorable Environments:Coping<br />
with Adverse Conditions and Creating Opportunities”. Paper from the CURE<br />
Workshop on Climate Change, Siem Reap, Cambodia, 2010.<br />
Singh S., Singh U.P., Singh R.K., Haefele S. and Ismail A.M. 2014. Climate-ready rice<br />
leveraging synergy <strong>of</strong> tolerant varieties and good management for better system<br />
productivity in flood-affected rainfed lowlands. In:4 th international Rice Congress,<br />
Bangkok, Thailand, pp. 1180.<br />
T3-24P-1050<br />
High Resolution Dissection <strong>of</strong> Photosystem II Electron Transport Under<br />
Elevated CO2 and Elevated Temperature Under Carbon dioxide and<br />
Temperature Gradient Chambers (CTGC) in Pearl Millet<br />
(Pennisetum glaucum L.)<br />
Arun K. Shanker * , M. Vanaja, S. K. Yadav, M. Prabhakar and V. K. Singh<br />
ICAR- Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, Hyderabad<br />
* arunshank@gmail.com<br />
Heat stress tends to impede and restrict the efficiency <strong>of</strong> photosynthesis, chlorophyll<br />
fluorescence, and maximum photochemical quantum yield in plants based on their<br />
characteristic ability to interfere with the electron transport system in photosystem II. Elevated<br />
CO2 has beneficial effects on photosynthesis and these two situations can have multifarious<br />
effects on photosystem II. An experiment was conducted in under Carbon dioxide and<br />
Temperature Gradient Chambers in Pearl Millet. We attempted a high-resolution dissection <strong>of</strong><br />
electron transport in PSII with studies on chlorophyll a fast fluorescence kinetics and Non-<br />
Photochemical Quenching (NPQ) under elevated CO 2 and three gradients <strong>of</strong> elevated<br />
Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance<br />
386 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
temperature in pearl millet. Our results indicate that Oxygen Evolution Complex (OEC)<br />
damage is the primary effect <strong>of</strong> heat stress and is not seen in the elevated CO 2 conditions. Low<br />
exciton absorption flux in heat stress caused an electron transport traffic jam in the donor side<br />
<strong>of</strong> PSII. Our results indicate that the functional state <strong>of</strong> photosystem II has differentially<br />
sensitivity to heat and elevated CO 2. Maximum quantum yield <strong>of</strong> Photosystem II<br />
photochemistry reduced in G2 and G3 gradient chambers in both elevated temperature and<br />
elevated CO 2. C 4 plants have a higher temperature optimum for photosynthesis. The driving<br />
force for higher dry matter production under eCO 2 in combination with temperature is more<br />
due to an optimum temperature rather than elevated CO2. Elevated CO2 mitigated the adverse<br />
effect <strong>of</strong> G1(Ambient + 1.5 ± 0.5℃) on photosystem II electron transport.<br />
We bring out the mechanism by which maximum quantum yield <strong>of</strong> Photosystem II<br />
photochemistry reduced in G2 and G3 gradient chambers in both elevated temperature and<br />
elevated CO 2. It was shown that OEC was affected in the plants reflecting in low<br />
photosynthetic efficacy in the higher gradients <strong>of</strong> temperature and was not affected by elevated<br />
CO 2. The possible reason for this was seen as C4 plants have a higher temperature optimum<br />
for photosynthesis. A model (Fig.) was developed to show how photosystem II was affected<br />
by eCO2 and high temperature.<br />
Electron transport model <strong>of</strong> PSII under eCO2 and G1 and G2 gradients <strong>of</strong> high temperature<br />
387 | Page Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
T3-25P-1470<br />
Impact <strong>of</strong> Adoption on Improved Varieties <strong>of</strong> Chickpea (Cicer Arietinum)<br />
on Yield Performance Under NICRA Village <strong>of</strong> Ratlam District in Madhya<br />
Pradesh<br />
Gyanendra Pratap Tiwari, Sarvesh Tripathy* and Jitendra Bhandari<br />
Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Jaora, Ratlam, M.P-457001<br />
* sarveshtripathy@gmail.com<br />
The adoption pattern <strong>of</strong> improved varieties <strong>of</strong> chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) and their impact<br />
on farm income in NICRA village <strong>of</strong> Ratlam district with small household’s farmers spread<br />
over village Nawabganj and Sabalgrah during 2021 and 2022. Farmers <strong>of</strong> this region mostly<br />
preferred local varieties <strong>of</strong> chickpea as compared to improved varieties (JG-14 and RVH-202).<br />
The major constraints expressed by farmers in the adoption <strong>of</strong> improved varieties <strong>of</strong> chickpea<br />
included: low awareness <strong>of</strong> the new varieties; lack <strong>of</strong> pest-resistant varieties; non-availability<br />
<strong>of</strong> seeds <strong>of</strong> improved varieties; lack <strong>of</strong> access to credit; high cost <strong>of</strong> seeds; and lack <strong>of</strong> short or<br />
extra short duration varieties. The physical and financial performance <strong>of</strong> JG-14 and RVG-202<br />
were found to be better as compared to local varieties <strong>of</strong> chickpea. The result shows that the<br />
rate <strong>of</strong> adoption pattern <strong>of</strong> seed replacement <strong>of</strong> improved varieties increased up to 11% in year<br />
2022. The finding put in place a system for demonstrating the production potential <strong>of</strong> the new<br />
and promising chickpea varieties and providing timely information, credit, inputs and market<br />
support to accelerate the adoption and production <strong>of</strong> chickpeas in the state. The results also<br />
provide deep insight to stakeholders <strong>of</strong> chickpea not only to penetrate in seed markets but also<br />
help in deciding how to design an R&D program as well.<br />
T3-26P-1489<br />
Impact <strong>of</strong> Nutritional Manipulation in Cattle <strong>of</strong> Saline Coastal Areas <strong>of</strong><br />
Sundarban for Stress Management<br />
C. Majhi 1 , M.H. Molla 1 , K. Pal 1 , S. Banerjee 1 , A. Nayak 1 , P.K. Pathak 1 , B. Tudu 1 , F.H.<br />
Rahaman 2 and N.J. Maitra 3<br />
1 North 24 Parganas Krishi Vigyan Kendra, West Bengal University <strong>of</strong> Animal and Fishery Sciences,<br />
Ashokenagar, North 24 Parganas,<br />
2 ICAR-ATARI, Kolkata<br />
3 West Bengal University <strong>of</strong> Animal and Fishery Sciences, Belgachia, Kolkata<br />
kvkashoke@gmail.com<br />
Climate change is an ever-growing challenge throughout the world now-a-days. Rise <strong>of</strong><br />
temperature, recurrent events <strong>of</strong> natural calamities, erratic climatic aberration, rise <strong>of</strong> salinity<br />
in environment are leading to heat stress, decreased productive and reproductive performance,<br />
Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance<br />
388 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
increasing vector borne diseases and declining immunogenic response observed in livestock <strong>of</strong><br />
coastal areas <strong>of</strong> Sundarban. Cattle, the main milk producing animals at the area, are directly<br />
affected through different biotic and abiotic stress leading to economic loss <strong>of</strong> farmers. The<br />
present study was aimed to reduce the heat stress by nutritional manipulation through<br />
supplementation <strong>of</strong> different fodders. The study shows that among different treatments<br />
supplementation <strong>of</strong> matured Super Napier fodder @ 10 kg / day / animal with market available<br />
cattle feed @ 2 Kg / day /animal showed significant (p < 0.05) ameliorative effect against heat<br />
stress observed through body temperature, respiration rate, blood cortisol level, milk and body<br />
weight parameters within the time period <strong>of</strong> June to September.<br />
T3-27P-1188<br />
Management <strong>of</strong> Fall Armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda in Organic<br />
Sorghum Cultivation<br />
G. Shyam Prasad, J. Stanley, S. Aruna Sai, K. Srinivasa babu and B. Gangaiah<br />
ICAR- Indian Institute <strong>of</strong> Millets Research, Hyderabad- 500 030, Telangana<br />
Sorghum bicolor (L). Moench is one <strong>of</strong> the important crops for human and animal consumption,<br />
particularly in the semi-arid tropics and south Asian countries. It is grown in hot climate and<br />
best suited for drought conditions as it exhibits morphological adaptations for dry spells<br />
(Ramatoulaye et al. 2016). Sorghum is affected by many insect pests like shoot fly, stem borers,<br />
shoot bug, aphids, white grubs etc. Recently, fall armyworm (FAW), Spodoptera frugiperda<br />
(JE Smith) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) is being reported as the major pest causing economic<br />
losses. FAW is a highly polyphagous insect pest that attacks more than 80 plant species,<br />
Majorly, maize, sorghum, millet, sugarcane, and vegetable crops in India (Prasanna et al. 2018).<br />
The young caterpillars <strong>of</strong> FAW start feeding on the leaves, that shows patches on the leaves<br />
called windows. By stage 4, the caterpillar will be bigger and have reached the whorl, where it<br />
does the most damage, resulting in ragged holes in the leaves. Feeding on young plants can kill<br />
the growing point, resulting in reducing the growth <strong>of</strong> new leaves and cobs. Though there are<br />
many insecticides recommended for the management <strong>of</strong> this pest, it is needed to have a biointensive<br />
pest management module for sorghum farmers as the crop is grown mostly under<br />
organic farming condition.<br />
Methodology<br />
A field trail was conducted at research farm <strong>of</strong> ICAR - Indian Institute <strong>of</strong> Millets Research,<br />
Hyderabad, Telangana. India during two consecutive Rabi seasons <strong>of</strong> 2018-2019 and 2019-<br />
2020 to evaluate the efficacy <strong>of</strong> biocontrol agents in sorghum. The experiment was laid out in<br />
randomized block design (RBD), with seven treatments viz., T1 (Trichogramma pretiosum 1<br />
card per acre), T2 (T1 + NBAIR Bt 2%), T3 (T1 + Metarhizium anisopliae NBAIR-Ma 35,<br />
389 | Page Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
0.5%), T4 (T1 + EPN Heterorhabditis indica NBAIR H38), T5 (T1 + Pseudomonas<br />
fluorescens (Pf DWD 1%)), T6 (Insecticidal check (Emamectin benzoate 0.4g/l)) including (T<br />
7 )untreated control each replicated thrice. The commercial variety CSV 29 was grown in ~40<br />
m 2 plot size. The crop was grown following all the agronomic practices and fertilizer<br />
application as per the package <strong>of</strong> practices recommended for the zone without plant protection<br />
measures to ensure natural infestation. The treatments T6 and T7 were imposed with a buffer<br />
crop spread at 200 m from rest <strong>of</strong> the treatments. Observations were made on the whorl<br />
infestation at 20DAE (Pre-Treatment) and 30DAE, 40DAE (post-Treatment) to identify the<br />
reduction in egg patches, larval population and plant damage and percent reduction was<br />
calculated over untreated check.<br />
Results<br />
The incidence <strong>of</strong> fall armyworm was observed to be moderate and the incidence was observed<br />
from 10DAE <strong>of</strong> crop. It inflicted irregular cuts on the leaves and later stages in whorl. A<br />
significant reduction in the number <strong>of</strong> eggs laid was observed after the application <strong>of</strong> first round<br />
<strong>of</strong> treatments as compared to control in all treatments. The egg patches ranged from 0.66-2.66<br />
egg patches/ 10 plants/ plot during the first year and 0-3.0 eggs patches/ 10 plants/ plot in the<br />
second year <strong>of</strong> experimentation. By the second round <strong>of</strong> treatments egg patches were not<br />
observed across the treatments.<br />
Larvae per 10 Plants: It was found that no larva was found in T6 (insecticide) after the<br />
application <strong>of</strong> second round <strong>of</strong> treatment. The next best treatments were T2 – T. pretiosum +<br />
M. anisopliae (1.00 larvae/10 plants) which is on par with T1 - T. pretiosum + Bt (1.33) in the<br />
first year <strong>of</strong> experimentation. All the treatments had registered significant reduction in larval<br />
population with respect to untreated control and pre-treatment count.<br />
Plant damage (%): Two sprays Insecticidal treatment was found to register significant<br />
reduction in pest population and thus the plant damage also. Treatments with Bt and<br />
Metarhizium anisopliae (Ma) also registered very less damage <strong>of</strong> 1.17 and 1.27% after two<br />
rounds <strong>of</strong> application in the first year. In the second year also, 93.8 and 91.4% reduction in leaf<br />
damage over the untreated control was observed in Ma and Bt, respectively after two rounds<br />
<strong>of</strong> application. The release <strong>of</strong> egg parasitoid, Trichogramma pretiosum was found effective but<br />
not sufficient in the management <strong>of</strong> fall armyworm in our previous experiments (Jaraleño-<br />
Teniente et al., 2020). So, the release <strong>of</strong> T. pretiosum was kept constant in all the treatment,<br />
since it is not sufficient to manage the pest, spray <strong>of</strong> NBAIR Bt 2%, Metarhizium anisopliae<br />
NBAIR-Ma, EPN Heterorhabditis indica NBAIR H38 and Pseudomonas fluorescens (Pf DWD<br />
1%) were tested.<br />
Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance<br />
390 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Conclusion<br />
The results revealed that the Metarhizium anisopliae NBAIR-Ma 35 0.5% and NBAIR Bt 2%<br />
are equally effective in managing the pest. So, M. anisopliae and B. thuringiensis can be<br />
recommended for the management <strong>of</strong> fall armyworm in sorghum crop grown under organic<br />
farming.<br />
References<br />
Jaraleño-Teniente, J., Lomeli-Flores, J. R., Rodríguez-Leyva, E., BujanosMuñiz, R.,<br />
Rodríguez-Rodríguez, S. E. 2020. Egg parasitoids survey <strong>of</strong> Spodoptera frugiperda<br />
(Smith) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in maize and sorghum in Central Mexico. Insects.<br />
11:157.<br />
Prasanna, B. M., Huesing, J. E., Eddy, R., Peschke, V. M. 2018. Fall Armyworm in Africa: A<br />
Guide for Integrated Pest Management, 1 st ed.; CIMMYT: Edo Mex, Mexico.<br />
Ramatoulaye, F., Mady, C., Fallou, S., Amadou, K., Cyril, D., and Massamba, D. 2016.<br />
Production and Use Sorghum: A Literature Review. Journal <strong>of</strong> Nutritional Health &<br />
Food Science. 4(1): 1-4.<br />
T3-28P-1331<br />
Morpho-Physiological Characterization <strong>of</strong> Drought Stress Tolerance at<br />
Flowering Stage in Black Gram (Vigna mungo L. Hepper)<br />
B. Sarkar, Y. Varalaxmi, K. Tejasree, N. Jyoti Lakshmi, M. Vanaja, Salini K., Satish P.,<br />
S.S. Shishodia, M. Prabhakar A.K. Shanker, S.K. Yadav and V.K. Singh<br />
ICAR-Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, Hyderabad-500059<br />
Black gram is the fourth most important pulse crop after chickpea, pigeon pea and green<br />
gram in acreage, production in India. Drought is the major factor affecting black gram<br />
productivity specially in the era <strong>of</strong> climate change. When exposed to drought stress,<br />
plants trigger various morpho-physiological responses (Baroowa and Gogoi 2012;<br />
Baroowa et al.2016, Gurumurthy et al., 2018) to cope with stress for completing its life<br />
cycle. Although grain yield is commonly used as criterion to measure drought tolerance,<br />
dissecting yield into its contributing traits is critical for screening <strong>of</strong> germplasm and<br />
utilizing in breeding program. Drought stress affects various morpho-physiological<br />
traits like relative water content, membrane stability index, proline, apart from yield<br />
attributes, eventually adversely affecting realization <strong>of</strong> source and sink potentials<br />
(Anjum et al., 2011). Hence, it is paramount to develop drought-tolerant varieties to<br />
improve crop productivity and make it more pr<strong>of</strong>itable to the farming communities.<br />
Characterization and identification <strong>of</strong> traits are important for efficient utilization <strong>of</strong><br />
391 | Page Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
available germplasm in crop improvement program. In this context, the present study<br />
was conducted to characterize black gram genotypes for morpho-physiological and<br />
yield related traits following imposition <strong>of</strong> water stress at flowering stage for identifying<br />
tolerant genotypes and using in genetic enhancement program.<br />
Methodology<br />
A field experiment was conducted under well-watered and water stressed conditions<br />
during kharif 2021 with 40 genotypes in a randomized complete block design (RCBD)<br />
having 3 replications. The various morpho-physiological traits were recorded where a<br />
dry spell <strong>of</strong> 10 days coincided with the flowering stage. The data recorded were on<br />
various morpho-physiological traits including SPAD chlorophyll meter reading<br />
(SCMR), NDVI, CTD, fv/fm, RWC, membrane stability index (MSI), proline,<br />
malondialdehyde (MDA), yield and its attributes. The data were statistically analyzed<br />
with SAS s<strong>of</strong>tware (Version 9.3; SAS Institute, Cary, NC). Analysis <strong>of</strong> variance and<br />
least significant difference (LSD) test was applied to compare the genotypes.<br />
Results<br />
The pooled analysis <strong>of</strong> variance (ANOVA) revealed significant genotypic differences<br />
(p0.05) for all morphophysiological<br />
logical traits<br />
indicating the magnitude <strong>of</strong><br />
differences in genotypes were<br />
sufficient to select superior<br />
genotypes against drought stress.<br />
While, the genotype × treatment<br />
interaction effect was also found<br />
to be significant for most <strong>of</strong> the<br />
morpho-physiological<br />
traits except pod length<br />
and cluster number. The<br />
significant variation due to<br />
genotype, treatment and<br />
their interaction indicated<br />
that these traits were<br />
influenced by both genetic<br />
and treatment conditions.<br />
The genotypes under<br />
water stress showed<br />
Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance<br />
392 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
reduction in the various physiological and yield related traits. Physiological traits<br />
showed that proline content under control and stress conditions varied from 12–28 μg/g<br />
FW and 14–32 μg/g FW with increased accumulation under stress condition. The<br />
genotypes IPU-7-3, IPU-11-2, IPU-96-12, IPU-11-6, and IPU-13-6 accumulated 2.54 to<br />
1.49 folds more proline under stress conditions compared to control. While, MDA<br />
content under control and stress conditions varied from 6.55–16.40 μmol/g FW and<br />
9.78–23.75 μmol/g FW. The genotypes IPU-10-32, IPU-13-1, IPU-11-2, IPU-96-7 and<br />
IPU-10-21 had lower MDA content and were less affected by stress. The genotypes<br />
IPU-10-1, IPU-10-26, IPU-10-33, IPU-11-6, IPU-2-37, IPU-9-13, IPU-94-4 and LBG-<br />
623 maintained higher relative water content, membrane stability index and yield both<br />
under well-watered and water stress conditions (Table 1). The correlation analysis<br />
revealed significant positive correlations between different traits under well-water and<br />
water stress conditions. Under well-watered conditions significant positive correlations<br />
were observed for pod yield with hundred seed weight, seed yield, total biomass while<br />
hundred seed weight with total biomass and seed yield with total biomass. Under waterdeficit<br />
stress conditions significant negative correlation was observed between RWC<br />
and plant height; total biomass with harvest index.<br />
Black gram genotypes performing better both under well-watered and water deficit<br />
Genotype<br />
Relative<br />
water<br />
content (%)<br />
Membrane<br />
stability index<br />
(%)<br />
stress conditions<br />
Days to<br />
50%<br />
flowering<br />
Pod yield<br />
(g/plant)<br />
Seed yield<br />
(g/plant)<br />
100 seed<br />
weight (g)<br />
WW WD WW WD WW WD WW WD WW WD WW WD<br />
IPU-10-1 83.12 81.25 67.61 58.33 34 35 5.80 6.27 4.47 4.53 4.07 4.03<br />
IPU-10-26 78.76 77.40 63.53 52.97 33 33 6.93 6.33 5.05 4.40 4.20 4.67<br />
IPU-10-33 79.21 78.93 76.88 67.52 34 34 8.47 8.19 5.34 4.95 4.42 4.42<br />
IPU-11-6 83.50 80.11 68.06 56.56 33 33 9.98 8.13 5.12 4.17 4.81 3.88<br />
IPU-2-37 84.06 81.80 80.62 55.92 35 36 7.06 5.60 4.86 4.73 4.42 4.31<br />
IPU-9-13 78.93 78.19 64.93 58.84 34 34 6.13 6.20 5.39 4.74 4.19 3.85<br />
IPU-94-4 81.91 80.93 59.65 56.06 34 34 7.09 6.40 5.12 4.30 4.77 4.17<br />
LBG-623 79.63 74.30 68.93 65.86 35 37 7.40 6.92 5.20 4.27 4.77 4.40<br />
WW: well-watered; WD: water-deficit stress<br />
Conclusion<br />
The present study revealed differential responses for morpho-physiological and yield traits<br />
among black gram genotypes. Drought stress affected morpho-physiological traits including<br />
RWC and MSI with reduced growth and development, while parameters like proline, MDA<br />
showed enhanced activities. Genotypes maintaining similar levels <strong>of</strong> morpho-physiological<br />
activities under stress when compared with well-watered conditions can work as an important<br />
stress marker. These morpho-physiological traits may be useful for selection <strong>of</strong> drought tolerant<br />
393 | Page Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
genotypes for improved productivity in drought prone environments. Among various traits MSI<br />
and proline content were having contrasting behaviour in stress and well-water conditions<br />
indicating its role in distinguishing genotypes for stress tolerance. Among genotypes tested,<br />
IPU-10-1, IPU-10-26, IPU-10-33, IPU-11-6, IPU-2-37, IPU-9-13, IPU-94-4 and LBG-623<br />
performed better both under well-watered and water stress conditions. While, the genotypes<br />
IPU-7-3, IPU-11-2, IPU-96-12, IPU-11-6, and IPU-13-6 accumulated 2.54 to 1.49 folds more<br />
proline under stress conditions compared to control. Thus, morpho-physiological<br />
characterization <strong>of</strong> black gram may be useful for selection <strong>of</strong> drought tolerant genotypes for<br />
improved productivity in drought prone environments.<br />
References<br />
Anjum S.A., Xie X., Wang L., Saleem M.F., Man C., Lei W. 2011. Morphological,<br />
physiological and biochemical responses <strong>of</strong> plants to drought stress. Afr J Agric Res<br />
6:2026-2032<br />
Baroowa B., Gogoi N. 2012. Effect <strong>of</strong> induced drought on different growth and biochemical<br />
attributes <strong>of</strong> black gram (Vigna mungo L.) and green gram (Vigna radiata L.). J Env Res<br />
Dev 6:584–593<br />
Baroowa B., Gogoi N., Farooq M. 2016. Changes in physiological, biochemical and<br />
antioxidant enzyme activities <strong>of</strong> green gram (Vigna radiata L.) genotypes under drought.<br />
Acta Physiol Plant (2016) 38:219. DOI 10.1007/s11738-016-2230-7<br />
Gurumurthy S., Sarkar B., Vanaja M., Jyoti Lakshmi N., Yadav S.K. and Maheswari M. 2018.<br />
Morpho-physiological and biochemical changes in black gram (Vigna mungo L. Hepper)<br />
genotypes following imposition <strong>of</strong> water stress at flowering stage. Acta Physiologae<br />
Planta. 41:1-14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11738-019-2833-x<br />
T3-29P-1525<br />
Performance <strong>of</strong> Buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum Moench.) Genotypes<br />
under Varied Fertility Levels in Northern Transition Zone <strong>of</strong> Karnataka<br />
H. P Keerthi, S. A Biradar, U. K Hulihalli * and Geeta S. Tamgale<br />
College <strong>of</strong> Agriculture, UAS Dharwad 580005, Karnataka<br />
*hulihalliuk@uasd.in<br />
Fagopyrum esculentum Moench (common buckwheat) is an herbaceous erect annual plant with<br />
a diploid chromosomal number (2n = 16). It is a member <strong>of</strong> the polygonaceae family.<br />
Buckwheat is one <strong>of</strong> the most significant pseudo cereal crops <strong>of</strong> the alpine region, widely<br />
planted between 1,800 and 4,500 m above MSL during the kharif season in the middle and<br />
higher Himalayas. Buckwheat is evolved in Central Asia's temperate climate. Buckwheat is<br />
Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance<br />
394 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
grown on an area <strong>of</strong> 2.04 million hectares in the world, with production <strong>of</strong> 2.4 million tonnes<br />
and productivity is 1000 kg ha -1 . Buckwheat is grown for food and fodder in a number <strong>of</strong> Asian<br />
nations, including India. Buckwheat is primarily grown in the temperate zones <strong>of</strong> the Northern<br />
hemisphere, particularly in Russia (Oshini, 2004). It's grown in the United States, Canada,<br />
France, Germany, the United Kingdom, Denmark, Poland, the Netherlands, Sweden, Australia,<br />
Bulgaria, Romania, Italy, Japan, South Africa, Brazil, China, South Korea, Nepal and Bhutan.<br />
It is a multi-purpose crop cultivated mainly for grains (11-14 % gluten free protein) for human<br />
consumption, livestock, piggery and poultry feeds, as green manure crop, soil binding crop and<br />
as a smother crop. Except in select areas <strong>of</strong> Tamil Nadu, farmers in south India are largely<br />
unaware <strong>of</strong> the crop. Recently it is introduced in the Northern Transition Zone <strong>of</strong> Karnataka,<br />
hence to know suitable genotypes and nutrition which plays vital role to exploit its fullest<br />
potential is the need <strong>of</strong> the hour.<br />
Methodology<br />
The experiment was carried out at MARS, UAS, Dharwad during kharif 2021-22. It was laid<br />
out in split plot design with nine treatment combinations and replicated thrice. The treatments<br />
consist <strong>of</strong> three genotypes viz., G 1: Nilagiri (Dharwad selection-1), G 2: IC-79147 and G 3: PRB-<br />
1 in main plots and three fertilizer levels viz., F1: 100 % RDF (30:15:15 N:P2O5:K2O kg ha -1 ),<br />
F 2: 125 % RDF (37.5:18.75:18.75 N:P 2O 5:K 2O kg ha -1 ) and F 3: 150 % RDF (45:22.5:22.5<br />
N:P2O5:K2O kg ha -1 ) in sub plots were taken. Crop was sown during Kharif 2021 and full dose<br />
<strong>of</strong> NPK was applied at the time <strong>of</strong> sowing. The standard procedures are followed to record the<br />
yield and yield observations.<br />
Results<br />
The results <strong>of</strong> experiment was indicated that among the genotypes, IC-79147 recorded<br />
significantly higher attributes viz., number <strong>of</strong> clusters planr -1 , number <strong>of</strong> grains clusters -1 , test<br />
weight and grain yield. Higher yield attributes with IC-79147 were mainly due to a higher<br />
capacity to convert photosynthates from source to sink and a higher yield parameter in IC-<br />
79147 led to a higher grain yield. The genotype IC-79147 was on par with Nilagiri as per as<br />
grain yield was concerned. However, the straw yield was higher with PRB 1 and it was mainly<br />
due long growing period and lower harvest index. Higher net returns were recorded with IC-<br />
79147 as compared PRB 1. Gross returns and the BC ratio showed a similar pattern. Similar<br />
results were observed by Maruti et al. (2018), Among the fertility levels, application <strong>of</strong> 150 %<br />
RDF recorded significantly higher yield attributes viz., number <strong>of</strong> clusters plant -1 , number <strong>of</strong><br />
grains clusters -1 , grain yield and straw yield and it was on par with 125 % RDF. Higher yield,<br />
yield attributes and economics were due to higher nutrient application which was used by<br />
buckwheat efficiently. Among the interaction effect genotype IC-79147 with 150 per cent RDF<br />
resulted in significantly higher yield, yield attributes and economics.<br />
395 | Page Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Conclusion<br />
With this study, it was concluded that genotype IC-79147 with 150 per cent RDF can be<br />
recommended for Northern Transition Zone <strong>of</strong> Karnataka to get higher grain yield, net returns<br />
and BC ratio during Kharif season.<br />
References<br />
Maruti, Hulihalli U.K. and Aravind Kumar B.N. 2018, Production Potential <strong>of</strong> Buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum Moench)<br />
as Influenced by Genotypes and Fertilizer Levels in Northern Transition Zone <strong>of</strong> Karnataka. Int. J. Curr.<br />
Microbiol. Appl Sci. 7(09): 537-545.<br />
Oshini, 2004, The origin <strong>of</strong> cultivated buckwheat (Fagopyrum tarticumL.). Proceedings <strong>of</strong> 9th International Symposium on<br />
buckwheat. Advances in Buckwheat Resident 4. Cultivation and plant nutrition 18-22 August 2004, Congress<br />
Centre <strong>of</strong> the Agricultural University. Prague-Suchdol (Czech Republic), pp. 16-21.<br />
Number <strong>of</strong> clusters plant -1 , number <strong>of</strong> grains clusters -1 , grain yield, straw yield, net<br />
returns and B:C ratio <strong>of</strong> buckwheat as influenced by genotypes, fertilizer levels and<br />
their interaction effects<br />
Treatments<br />
Main plot (Genotypes)<br />
Number <strong>of</strong><br />
clusters<br />
plant -1<br />
Number<br />
<strong>of</strong> grains<br />
clusters -1<br />
Grain<br />
yield<br />
(kg ha -1 )<br />
Straw<br />
yield<br />
(kg ha -1 )<br />
Net<br />
returns<br />
( ha -1 )<br />
B:C<br />
ratio<br />
G 1 12.61 a* 7.22 ab 940 ab 1774 b 30214 ab 2.62 ab<br />
G 2 13.29 a 7.60 a 985 a 1831 a 32513 a 2.75 a<br />
G 3 9.39 b 6.39 b 860 b 1912 a 26337 b 2.41 b<br />
S. Em.± 0.29 0.15 16.4 25.6 846 0.05<br />
Sub-plot (Fertilizer level)<br />
F 1 10.22 b 6.14 b 760 b 1528 b 21362 b 2.18 b<br />
F 2 11.72 ab 7.17 ab 959 a 1907 a 31305 ab 2.69 ab<br />
F 3 13.35 a 7.90 a 1065 a 2083 a 36399 a 2.92 a<br />
S. Em.± 0.31 0.20 34.8 65.3 1804 0.10<br />
Interaction (G x F)<br />
G 1F 1 10.33 de 6.21 de 770 de 1467 c 21795 cd 2.20 bc<br />
G 1F 2 12.77 c 7.42 bc 959 a-d 1808 a-c 31180 abc 2.68 ab<br />
G 1F 3 14.73 ab 8.02 ab 1091 ab 2049 a 37667 ab 2.99 a<br />
G 2F 1 11.81 cd 6.46 cde 801 c-e 1506 c 23420 cd 2.29 bc<br />
G 2F 2 13.06 bc 7.78 ab 1022 ab 1895 ab 34432 ab 2.86 a<br />
G 2F 3 15.01 a 8.56 a 1131 a 2093 a 39688 a 3.09 a<br />
G 3F 1 8.53 e 5.75 e 708 e 1610 bc 18870 d 2.04 c<br />
G 3F 2 9.32 e 6.30 cde 897 b-e 2019 a 28302 bcd 2.53 abc<br />
G 3F 3 10.31 de 7.12 bcd 974 a-c 2107 a 31841 abc 2.68 ab<br />
S. Em.± 0.53 0.32 51.9 95.9 2688 0.15<br />
Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance<br />
396 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
T3-30P-1336<br />
Performance <strong>of</strong> Chickpea (Var. Phule Vikram) Under Rainfed Condition<br />
in Solapur District <strong>of</strong> Maharashtra<br />
S.G. Jadhav*, T.R.Walkunde., P.N.Madavi. and V.G. Vairagar<br />
Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Moho l(Solapur-II) Ta. Mohol Dist. Solapur<br />
Mahatma Phule Krishi Vidyapeeth, Rahuri 413 722(MS), India<br />
* sharadjadhav48@gmail.com<br />
Though chickpea is widely grown in Solapur district, various factors influence potential yield<br />
<strong>of</strong> the crop such as, faulty sowing practices, lack <strong>of</strong> knowledge about high yielding and disease<br />
resistant varieties. Lack <strong>of</strong> awareness about seed treatment, integrated nutrient management,<br />
integrated pest management and varieties suitable for mechanical harvesting and use <strong>of</strong> micro<br />
irrigation at critical growth stage etc. Above all in the district predominantly noticed problems<br />
for chickpea cultivation are high incidence <strong>of</strong> wilt, terminal drought condition, labor shortage<br />
for harvesting etc. Hence, climate resilient variety appears to be major challenges to increase<br />
productivity. This can be achieved by means <strong>of</strong> use <strong>of</strong> high yielding, climate resilient and<br />
suitable for mechanical harvesting variety and improved cultivation practices. With this<br />
background, Cluster Front line demonstrations were conducted to show the worth <strong>of</strong> high<br />
yielding, climate resilient and mechanically harvested improved variety <strong>of</strong> chickpea<br />
Methodology<br />
Technology demonstration on chickpea variety Phule Vikram was conducted by Krishi Vigyan<br />
Kendra, Mohol during 2019-2020, 2020-2021 and 2021-2022 in district <strong>of</strong> Solapur. About 100<br />
demonstration was conducted on 40 ha area during 2019-20, while total 75 demonstarion was<br />
conducted on 30 ha area each year during 2020-21 and 2021-22. In general soil <strong>of</strong> the area<br />
under study was medium to heavy. The component demonstration technology in chickpea was<br />
comprised i.e. university recommended improved variety Phule Vikram which was wilt<br />
resistant, suitable for mechanical harvesting, high yielding. In the demonstration, one control<br />
plot was also kept where farmers practices was carried out. The demonstration were conducted<br />
to study the technology gap between the potential yield and demonstrated yield, extension gap<br />
between demonstrated yield and yield under existing practice and technology index. The yield<br />
data were collected from both the demonstration and farmers practice by random crop cutting<br />
method and analyzed by using simple statistical tools. The percent increase yield, technology<br />
gap, extension gap and technology index were calculated by using following formula as per<br />
Samui et al., (2000), as given below-<br />
397 | Page Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Percent increase in yield =<br />
Demonstration yield – Farmers practice yield<br />
Farmers practice yield<br />
X 100<br />
Technology gap = Potential yield - Demonstration yield<br />
Extension gap = Demonstration yield –Farmers practice plot yield<br />
Results<br />
Technology index (%) =<br />
Technology gap<br />
Potential yield X100<br />
Cluster Frontline demonstrations studies were carried out in Solapur district <strong>of</strong> Maharashtra<br />
state in Rabi season from 2019-20 to 2020-2021, 2021-22. During three years <strong>of</strong> technologies<br />
results obtained are presented in Table 1. The results revealed that the demonstration on<br />
chickpea an average seed yield recorded 1322.66 kg/ha under demonstrated plots as compare<br />
to farmers practice 983.33 kg/ha. The highest seed yield in the demonstration plot was 1610<br />
kg/ha during 2021-22. The average yield <strong>of</strong> chickpea increased 34.87 per cent (Table 1). These<br />
results clearly indicated that the higher average seed yield in demonstration plots compared to<br />
farmers practice due to integrated crop management practices and awareness <strong>of</strong> wilt resistant<br />
and high yielding Phule Vikram variety. Adoption <strong>of</strong> scientific package <strong>of</strong> practices like seed<br />
treatment, integrated nutrient management, bio-pesticide, micro irrigation at critical growth<br />
stage, seed treatment with bio-fertilizers and need based right plant protection practices resulted<br />
in higher yields.<br />
Based on observation made, extension gap, technology gap and technology index were worked<br />
out. The extension gap observed during different years was 292, 296 and 430 kg/ha during<br />
2019-20, 2020-21 and 2021-22 respectively. On an average extension gap observed in three<br />
years under CFLD implemented villages was 339.33 kg/ha. The highest extension gap 430<br />
kg/ha was recorded in 2021-22 followed by 296 kg/ha (2020-21) and 292 kg/ha (2019-20).<br />
Technology gap is the difference between potential yield and demonstrated plot yield. The<br />
technology gap observed during different years was 618, 324 and 40 kg/ha during 2019-20,<br />
2020-21 and 2021-22 respectively. On an average technology gap observed in three years under<br />
FLD implemented villages was 327.33 kg/ha. The highest technology gap 618 kg/ha was<br />
recorded in 2019-20 followed by 324 kg/ha (2020-21) and 40 kg/ha (2021-22).<br />
On an average technology index observed was 19.83 % for three years where cluster front line<br />
demonstrations were conducted. This shows the efficiency and effectiveness <strong>of</strong> the improved<br />
technologies as a result <strong>of</strong> successful technical interventions to increase the yield performance<br />
<strong>of</strong> chickpea. Economics returns related to input and output prices <strong>of</strong> commodities prevailed<br />
during the study period, were recorded. The cultivation <strong>of</strong> chickpea under improved<br />
technologies CFLD gave higher net returns <strong>of</strong> Rs. 20358, Rs. 27626 and Rs. 40730 per hectare<br />
Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance<br />
398 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
as against to farmers practices i.e., Rs. 9020, Rs. 11530 and Rs 16514 per hectare during the<br />
years 2019-20, 2020-21 and 2021-22 respectively.<br />
The Benefit: cost ratio <strong>of</strong> chickpea observed during different years 2019-20, 2020-21 and 2021-<br />
22 under improved cultivation practices were 1.81, 1.69 and 1.93 respectively while it was<br />
1.39, 1.28 and 1.36 under farmers practice for the respective years. The highest B:C ratio in<br />
demo plots is because <strong>of</strong> higher yields obtained under improved technologies compared to<br />
farmers practices during all the three years.<br />
Yield, technology gap, extension gap and technology index in chickpea cultivation<br />
Year<br />
Potential<br />
Yield<br />
(Kg/ha)<br />
Average seed yield<br />
(Kg/ha)<br />
Demo<br />
Farmers<br />
Practice<br />
during 2019 to 2022<br />
Percent<br />
increase<br />
Technology<br />
gap<br />
(Kg/ha)<br />
Extension<br />
gap<br />
(Kg/ha)<br />
Technology<br />
index (%)<br />
2019-20 1650 1032 740 39.45 618 292 37.45<br />
2020-21 1650 1326 1030 28.73 324 296 19.63<br />
2021-22 1650 1610 1180 36.44 40 430 2.42<br />
Mean 1650 1322.66 983.33 34.87 327.33 339.33 19.83<br />
Economic impact <strong>of</strong> chickpea cultivated under CFLD and Farmers practice during<br />
2019 to 2022<br />
Year<br />
No. <strong>of</strong><br />
Demo<br />
Area<br />
(ha)<br />
Gross income<br />
Rs./ha.<br />
Demo<br />
Farmers<br />
Practice<br />
Net income Rs./ha.<br />
Demo<br />
Farmers<br />
Practice<br />
Demo<br />
B: C Ratio<br />
Farmers<br />
Practice<br />
2019-20 100 40 45408 31820 20358 9020 1.81 1.39<br />
2020-21 75 30 67626 52530 27626 11530 1.69 1.28<br />
2021-22 75 30 84230 61714 40730 16514 1.93 1.36<br />
Mean 83.33 33.33 65754 48688 29571 12354 1.81 1.34<br />
Conclusion<br />
Chickpea variety Phule Vikram gave higher seed yield, gross monetary returns, net monetary<br />
returns and B: C ratio under rainfed condition over farmers practice.<br />
399 | Page Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Performance <strong>of</strong> Chickpea Varieties Under Late Sown Condition<br />
S.V. Thombre 1 , B.V. Asewar 2 , V.V. Goud 2 , K.A. Chavan 2 and S.G. Mane 2<br />
Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance<br />
1 VNMKV Parbhani, Maharashtra, India<br />
2 Dr. PDKV Akola-444 104 Maharashtra, India<br />
T3-31P-1418<br />
Chickpea is cool season crop. It’s yields and quality are mostly depending on climatic<br />
parameters and time <strong>of</strong> sowing. It is short durational crop and requires relatively low<br />
temperature for its optimum growth. In India, mid-October to mid-November is ideal period<br />
for sowing chickpea. Any deviation from this period causes conspicuous reduction in yield.<br />
Due to global warming, temperature is increasing day by day, also the rainfall pattern is<br />
disturbed and the rainy season is extended up to first fortnight <strong>of</strong> November. As a result,<br />
duration <strong>of</strong> winter season is reduced. In such condition, there is a need to adjust the sowing<br />
date with suitable cultivars <strong>of</strong> chickpea for obtaining higher yields. Hence field experiment<br />
entitled “To Study the Effect <strong>of</strong> Sowing Dates on Growth and Yield <strong>of</strong> Chickpea Varieties<br />
Under Late Sown Condition” was conducted at Pulse Research Unit, Dr. Panjabrao Deshmukh<br />
Krishi Vidyapeeth, Akola.<br />
Methodology<br />
The field experiment was conducted during rabi 2017-2018 at Pulse Research Unit, Dr.<br />
Panjabrao Deshmukh Krishi Vidyapeeth, Akola. The experiment was laid out in factorial<br />
randomized block design with three replications consisting <strong>of</strong> twenty-eight treatment<br />
combinations in each. The treatments consist <strong>of</strong> four sowing dates (15 th November, 30 th<br />
November, 15 th December and 30 th December) and seven chickpea varieties i.e. (PDKV<br />
Kanchan, Phule Vikram, BDN 797, AKG 70, RVG 202, RVG 203 and BDN 9-3). The soil<br />
experimental field was clayey in texture, low available nitrogen (184.58 kg/ha), medium in<br />
available phosphorus (16.21 kg ha -1 ) and high available potassium (375.43 kg ha -1 ) and<br />
slightly alkaline in reaction (pH 8.2). The gross and net plot size were 3.6 x 3.00 m 2 and 3.0 x<br />
2.8 m 2 , respectively. The chickpea crop was sown as per treatment by dibbling by one seed<br />
per hill at spacing <strong>of</strong> 30 x 10 cm 2 . Recommended fertilizer dose was applied.<br />
Results<br />
Effect <strong>of</strong> sowing dates : Different sowing time had a pr<strong>of</strong>ound influence on the grain yield.<br />
Significantly superior grain yield (1737 kg ha -1 ) was obtained when crop was sown on 15 th<br />
November than later sowing time <strong>of</strong> 30 th November, 15 th December and 30 th December. Crop<br />
sown on 30 th December recorded the lowest grain yield (653 kg ha -1 ). The mean values were<br />
higher when the crop was sown on 15 th November for all vegetative and reproductive attributes<br />
indicating that 15 th November sowing enabled the crop to express the inherent potential to the<br />
400 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
maximum as compared to later sowings. Ganguly and Bhattacharya (2001) have noted<br />
similar decisive effect <strong>of</strong> sowing time on chickpea growth and development and reported<br />
reductions in various morpho-physiological attributes with delayed sowing due to less<br />
favourable weather variables. There was significant variation in mean straw yield due to sowing<br />
dates. The higher straw yield recorded by 15 th November sowing date, which was found to be<br />
on par with sowing on 15 th December. The lowest straw yield (978 kg ha -1 ) recorded on 30 th<br />
December.<br />
The gross monetary returns were significantly influenced by different sowing dates.<br />
Significantly higher gross monetary return (Rs 78938 ha -1 ) was obtained by crop sown at 15 th<br />
November over rest <strong>of</strong> the sowing dates. The lowest value <strong>of</strong> gross monetary returns was<br />
recorded on sowing time 30 th December (Rs 31273.91 ha -1 ). The net monetary return was<br />
significantly influenced with sowing dates. The highest net monetary return (Rs 55846 ha -1 )<br />
was recorded by 15 th sowing over rest <strong>of</strong> the sowing dates. The highest benefit: cost ratio (3.42)<br />
was recorded at 15 th November sowing. The lowest value was recorded at 30 th December<br />
sowing treatment.<br />
Effect <strong>of</strong> varieties: There was statistically significant variation in seed yield due to varieties.<br />
The highest grain yield (1460 kg ha -1 ) was recorded in variety RVG 203 which was found at<br />
par with variety RVG<br />
202. However lowest grain yield (1207 kg ha -1 ) was produced by variety AKG 70. Difference<br />
in straw due to different varieties was significant. Variety RVG 203 recorded significantly higher<br />
straw yield (1875 kg ha -1 ), which was at par with variety RVG 202, BDN 797, and Phule<br />
Vikram. The lowest straw yield (1559 kg ha -1 ) observed in variety AKG 70. The cost <strong>of</strong><br />
cultivation for all varieties, was Rs. 23092 ha -1 . Chickpea variety RVG 203 significantly<br />
recorded higher gross monetary returns <strong>of</strong> (Rs 66758 ha -1 ) as compared to remaining varieties.<br />
The highest net monetary return (Rs 43666 ha -1 ) was recorded by RVG 203 variety over rest<br />
<strong>of</strong> the varieties. The highest benefit: cost ratio (2.89) was recorded in RVG 203 variety at rest <strong>of</strong><br />
the varieties. The lowest value <strong>of</strong> benefit: cost ratio (2.41) was recorded in AKG 70. The<br />
interaction effect between sowing dates and varieties were found to be non-significant in straw<br />
yield, except in grain yield<br />
401 | Page Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Effect <strong>of</strong> sowing dates on yield and economics <strong>of</strong> chickpea varieties (late sown)<br />
Treatment<br />
Grain<br />
Yield (kg<br />
ha -1 )<br />
Straw<br />
yield<br />
(kg ha -1 )<br />
Gross<br />
monetary<br />
return<br />
(Rs ha -1 )<br />
Net<br />
monetary<br />
return (Rs<br />
ha -1 )<br />
Benefit:<br />
cost ratio<br />
D1- 15 Nov (46 MW) 1737 2120 78938 55846 3.42<br />
D2- 30 Nov (48 MW) 1578 2000 71957 48865 3.12<br />
D3- 15 Dec (50 MW) 1442 1969 65958 42866 2.86<br />
D4- 30 Dec (52 MW) 653 978 31273 8181 1.35<br />
S.E. (m)± 14.84 24.33 716 718 -<br />
C.D. at 5 % 43.53 71.35 2102 2107 -<br />
V1- PDKV Kanchan 1319 1733 60562 37470 2.62<br />
V2- Phule Vikram 1354 1818 62105 39013 2.69<br />
V3- BDN 797 1313 1708 60294 37202 2.61<br />
V4- AKG 70 1207 1559 55645 32553 2.41<br />
V5- RVG 202 1416 1842 64811 41719 2.81<br />
V6- RVG 203 1460 1875 66758 43666 2.89<br />
V7- BDN 9-3 1398 1834 64049 40957 2.77<br />
S.E. (m) ± 19.63 32.18 948 950 -<br />
C. D. at 5 % 57.59 94.39 2780 2788 -<br />
Conclusion<br />
S.E. (m) ± 39.27 64.36 1896.15 1901.41 -<br />
C.D.at 5 % 115.17 NS NS NS NS<br />
GM 1353 1767 62032 38940<br />
From the present investigation it is concluded that sowing at 15 th November was better than<br />
rest <strong>of</strong> the sowing dates in experiment. Also, it was convinced that late sowing would reduce<br />
the dry matter production and yield irrespective <strong>of</strong> the varieties. Among the varieties the<br />
highest yield was recorded by the variety RVG 203 irrespective <strong>of</strong> the date <strong>of</strong> sowing. Hence<br />
it is suggested that the variety RVG 203 could be preferred over other varieties to get high<br />
yield under late sown condition.<br />
References<br />
Ganguly, S.B. and Bhattacharya, A. 2001. Effect <strong>of</strong> physiological traits on chickpea yield<br />
under normal and late seeding. Legume Res., 24(1): 6-10.<br />
Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance<br />
402 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
T3-32P-1223<br />
PGPR Strain Bacillus subtilis (Bbv57) Controls Stalk Rot <strong>of</strong> Maize Caused<br />
by Fusarium verticillioides<br />
Radhajeyalakshmi Raju 1* , Sathyasheela Veluchamy 1 , Selvakumar<br />
Thambiyannan 1 , Satheeshkumar Natesan 1 , and Karthikeyan Gandhi 2<br />
1 Maize Research Station, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Vagarai-624613<br />
2 Department <strong>of</strong> Plant Pathology, Center for Plant Protection Studies,<br />
Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore-641003<br />
* radhajeyalakshmi@hotmail.com<br />
The most important diseases associated with maize are caused by fungi, which are primarily<br />
represented by the genus Fusarium. In India, the disease is prevalent in most <strong>of</strong> the maize<br />
growing areas, particularly in rainfed areas viz., Jammu and Kashmir, Punjab, Haryana, Delhi,<br />
Rajasthan, Madhya Pradesh, Uttar Pradesh, Bihar, West Bengal, Andhra Pradesh, Tamil Nadu<br />
and Karnataka, where water stress occurs after flowering stage <strong>of</strong> the crop (Singh et al., 2012).<br />
The incidence <strong>of</strong> Post Flowering Stalk Rot complex (Charcoal rot, Fusarium stalk rot, Late<br />
wilt) was observed to be varying from 5 to 40 per cent at different parts <strong>of</strong> the country (Lal et<br />
al. 1998). The annual loss due to maize diseases in India was estimated to the tune <strong>of</strong> 13.2 to<br />
39.5%. The estimated loss due to Fusarium stalk rot has been reported as 38% in total yield.<br />
Irrespective public and private bred hybrids all are succumbing to severe stalk rot. Fusarium<br />
stalk rot was observed in the plant age group <strong>of</strong> 55 to 65 days which coincides with tasseling<br />
and silking and immediately followed grain formation stage. The soil borne pathogen led to<br />
breakage <strong>of</strong> stalk rotting, lodging and premature death <strong>of</strong> the infested plants. Hence, the present<br />
study was undertaken with an objective to work out management strategies using Bacillus as<br />
one <strong>of</strong> the components for this threatening disease.<br />
Methodology<br />
The present investigation was carried out during 2019 – 2020 at Maize Research Station,<br />
Vagarai, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University. Isolations was done by plating surface sterilized<br />
(4 per cent sodium hydrochloride) small pieces <strong>of</strong> infected tissues on Potato Dextrose Agar<br />
(PDA) medium. Purification <strong>of</strong> cultures was made by hyphal tip method.<br />
Inoculations should be made with <strong>of</strong> 45-50 days old plants just after flowering stage, in the<br />
lower internodes (second) above the soil level. Disease symptoms appeared in the inoculated<br />
plants about 20-25 days after inoculation. The disease intensity and severity is recorded<br />
following 1-9 rating scale (Meena Shekhar & Sangit, 2012). 1 - Healthy or slight discolouration<br />
at the site <strong>of</strong> inoculation, .2 - Up to 50% <strong>of</strong> the inoculated internode is discoloured, 3 - 51-75%<br />
<strong>of</strong> the inoculated internode is discoloured. 4 - 76-100% <strong>of</strong> the inoculated internode is<br />
403 | Page Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
discoloured, 5 - Less than 50% discolouration <strong>of</strong> the adjacent internode, 6 - More than 50%<br />
discolouration <strong>of</strong> the adjacent internode, 7 -discolouration <strong>of</strong> three internodes, 8 - discolouration <strong>of</strong><br />
four internodes, 9 - discolouration <strong>of</strong> five or more internodes and premature death <strong>of</strong> plant.<br />
To assess the field performance <strong>of</strong> bioagents, the trials were conducted at Maize Research<br />
Station,Vagari, Dindigul region <strong>of</strong> Tamil Nadu namely in randomized block design with three<br />
replications maintaining spacing <strong>of</strong> 60 cm between rows and 20 cm between plants. The bioagents<br />
T.asperellam (1x10 4 cfu/g) and B.subtilis (1x10 5 cfu/g) were applied in the soil before sowing @<br />
200g/m 2 . Unamended plots served as check. Seeds were treated with the slurry <strong>of</strong> carbendazim<br />
(0.2%) and bioagents <strong>of</strong> talc based formulation viz., T.asperellam (4g/kg), B.subtilis (10g/kg). Soil<br />
application <strong>of</strong> T.asperellam and B.subtilis was done @ 2.5kg/ha just before sowing. The<br />
fungitoxicants were applied in the form <strong>of</strong> spray on the above ground parts <strong>of</strong> the plants. Two foliar<br />
sprays, first two days after inoculation followed by the second 15 days later were made.<br />
Observations on disease severity were recorded 45 days after tooth pick inoculation <strong>of</strong> the pathogen<br />
following 1-9 scale devised by (Meena Shekhar & Sangit,2012). Disease scoring was done until<br />
cob development stage.<br />
Results<br />
In vivo studies on the efficacy <strong>of</strong> Bacillus subtilis (Bbv57) strain on Post Flowering Stalk Rot <strong>of</strong><br />
Maize caused by Fusarium verticillioides in maize were conducted under artificial epiphytotic<br />
conditions at Maize Research Station, Vagarai where the disease incidence was 3-10%. The<br />
experimental results revealed the reduction <strong>of</strong> 2.9% with increased yield <strong>of</strong> 6.5 tonnes/ha in<br />
Bacillus subtilis (Bbv57) treated plots compared to untreated control, which showed 5.1% disease<br />
incidence (Table), with low yield <strong>of</strong> 5.6 tonnes/ha. Bacillus subtilis one <strong>of</strong> the biocontrol agent<br />
found to colonize the roots <strong>of</strong> Maize and to control Fusarium at early stages <strong>of</strong> crop growth with<br />
high competitive ability in terms <strong>of</strong> colonizing the roots @ 1.4 x 10 7 cfu / g / root.Bacillus subtilis<br />
one <strong>of</strong> the biocontrol agents found to colonize the roots <strong>of</strong> Maize and to control Fusarium at early<br />
stages <strong>of</strong> crop growth with highly competitive ability in terms <strong>of</strong> colonizing the roots 10 7 cfu / g /<br />
root (Data not shown).<br />
In vivo efficacy <strong>of</strong> Bbv 57 strain against Fusarium stalk rot <strong>of</strong> maize under artificial<br />
Epiphytotic condition<br />
S.No Treatment PDI (%) Yield (kg/ha) C:B ratio<br />
1 ST + SA with Trichoderma asperellam (Tv1) 3.25 6367 1:1.17<br />
2 ST + SA with Bacillus subtilis (Bs1) 2.00 6517 1:2.10<br />
3 ST + SA with Carbendazim (0.2%) 4.13 6302 1:1.10<br />
4 Untreated control 7.50 5573<br />
CD (0.05%) 1.05 1912<br />
*ST: Seed Treatment; SA: Soil Application<br />
Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance<br />
404 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Conclusion<br />
The present investigation highlighted the potentialities <strong>of</strong> talc-based formulations <strong>of</strong> Bacillus<br />
subtilis obtained from Department <strong>of</strong> Plant Pathology, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University,<br />
Coimbatore-641003, Tamil Nadu, India in managing disease <strong>of</strong> maize. Seed treatment and soil<br />
application <strong>of</strong> Bacillus subtilis reduced disease incidence under in vivo conditions with high<br />
yield and the same isolate may be recommended for ec<strong>of</strong>riendly management <strong>of</strong> maize Post<br />
Flowering Stalk Rot in dryland ecosystems.<br />
References<br />
Lal, S., Leon, D. C., Saxena, V. K., Singh, S. B., Singh, N. N., Vasal, S. K. 1998. Maize stalk<br />
rot complexes: Innovative Breeding Approaches. Proc Seventh Asian Regional Maize<br />
Workshop, Los Banos, Philippines<br />
Meena Shekhar and Sangit. 2012. Inoculation methods and disease rating scales for maize<br />
disease. Directorate <strong>of</strong> Maize Research (Indian Council <strong>of</strong> Agricultural Research) Pusa<br />
Campus, New Delhi – 110 012 (India)<br />
Munkvold, G. P., and Desjardins, A. E. 1997. Fumonisins in maize. Can we reduce their<br />
occurrence?. Plant Dis. 81: 556-584.<br />
Singh, N., Rajendran, A., Meena, S., and Mittal, G. 2012. Biochemical response and hostpathogen<br />
relation <strong>of</strong> stalk rot fungi in early stages <strong>of</strong> maize (Zea mays L). African J<br />
Biotech. 11(82): 14837-14843.<br />
T3-33P-1211<br />
Physiological Parameters and Key Root Traits Contributing to the Yield<br />
Potential <strong>of</strong> Sorghum in the Northern Dry Zone <strong>of</strong> Karnataka<br />
R.S. Venkatesha 1 , B.O. Kiran 2 , V.H. Ashvathama 1 , B.R. Brahmesh Reddy 1 ,<br />
S.B. Patil 2 , R.B. Jolli 2 , R. Navyashree 1 and C.M. Nawalagatti 1<br />
1 University <strong>of</strong> Agricultural Sciences Dharwad 580 005, Karnataka<br />
2 Regional Agricultural Research Station Vijayapura 586 101, Karnataka<br />
Sorghum, which is locally known as jowar, it is generally grown in both kharif and rabi<br />
seasons. The major states contributing to national sorghum acreage, during rabi season, are<br />
Karnataka and Maharashtra. The productivity <strong>of</strong> sorghum in Karnataka recorded 1194 kg ha -1<br />
with area <strong>of</strong> 8.2 lakh hectares contributing to 9.8 lakh tons to India’s total sorghum production.<br />
Drought can reduce crop productivity which leading to lower income for farmers. Yield<br />
reduction can vary between 34 and 68 % depending on the developmental timing <strong>of</strong> the drought<br />
stress. The rabi sorghum is generally cultivated under stored and receding soil moisture with<br />
405 | Page Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
raising temperature at post-flowering stage.it experiences both the soil and atmospheric<br />
drought which is one <strong>of</strong> the major constraints responsible for destabilizing the rabi sorghum<br />
productivity. It has been documented that root growth, leaf area development and osmotic<br />
adjustment under stress are some <strong>of</strong> the guidelines characterizing for stress tolerance. The<br />
plasticity <strong>of</strong> root growth and development in response to changing moisture and nutrient status<br />
<strong>of</strong> the soil provide opportunities for exploring natural variation to identify beneficial root traits<br />
to enhance plant productivity in agricultural systems. Plant roots play an important role in plant<br />
growth by exploiting soil resources via the uptake <strong>of</strong> water and nutrients. Root traits such as<br />
root length, root volume, root density, and root fresh and dry weight are considered as useful<br />
traits for improving plant productivity under drought conditions.<br />
Methodology<br />
The experiment was conducted at Regional Agricultural Research Station, Vijayapura situated<br />
16°49’N and 76° 34’E with an altitude <strong>of</strong>678 meters above the mean sea level. The experiment<br />
was conducted in RCBD with three replications with 20 sorghum genotypes for physiological<br />
characterization and identification <strong>of</strong> key root traits contributing to yield and yield attributing<br />
characters. The water stress was induced by withholding irrigation post-40 days after sowing.<br />
The chlorophyll content was estimated using method suggested by Barnes et al. (1992) while<br />
relative water content was estimated by the method suggested by Barrs and Weatherly (1962).<br />
The membrane injury index was calculated by following the protocol <strong>of</strong> Kocheva et al. (2004).<br />
The root length was measured physically with a scale, root volume was measured by water<br />
displacement method while the dry mass was measured by drying the roots in the hot air oven<br />
at 70℃ for 72 hours intermittently after taking the fresh weight.<br />
Results<br />
The chlorophyll content <strong>of</strong> the leaf is expressed from the SPAD index, chlorophyll a,<br />
chlorophyll b and total chlorophyll content. Figure 1 represents the relationships <strong>of</strong><br />
physiological parameters with the grain yield. It revealed that the grain yield has significant<br />
positive association with chlorophyll a content (0.99), chlorophyll b content (0.86), total<br />
chlorophyll content (0.98) and SPAD index (0.95). This is representative that the<br />
photoassimilates being produced in the leaf tissues is converted into the grain yield. The total<br />
chlorophyll content has also shown significant positive associations with the yield attributes<br />
such as test weight (0.98) and harvest index (0.94). The chlorophyll content does not show<br />
significant positive association with the panicle weight (0.03). The significant positive<br />
association <strong>of</strong> the chlorophyll content with the harvest index describes the efficient partitioning<br />
<strong>of</strong> photoassimilates to the panicle. The relative water content has also shown a significant<br />
positive association with the grain yield (0.97) and the number <strong>of</strong> grains per plant (0.97). This<br />
is indicative <strong>of</strong> the plant that a higher water content in the leaf tissues under drought contributes<br />
Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance<br />
406 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
to the efficient functioning <strong>of</strong> the cell organelle which is reciprocated in the relationship <strong>of</strong> the<br />
membrane injury index with the physiological and yield attributes. The membrane injury index<br />
has shown to have a strong negative relationship with the relative water content (-0.97), total<br />
chlorophyll content (-0.98), grain yield (-0.98) and the number <strong>of</strong> grains per plant (-0.98). The<br />
sorghum genotypes capable <strong>of</strong> avoiding damages to the membranes are more capable <strong>of</strong><br />
producing photo-assimilates and reducing water losses from the leaf tissues in-turn resulting in<br />
better yields. Figure 2 describes the relationships <strong>of</strong> the root parameters such as root length,<br />
root volume, root diameter and root biomass. The grain yield has shown a positive relationship<br />
with the root length (0.69), root volume (0.78), root biomass (0.89 for root fresh weight and<br />
0.71 for root dry weight). The longer roots are capable <strong>of</strong> absorbing water from the deeper<br />
layers <strong>of</strong> soil regime when they face reduced availability <strong>of</strong> moisture in the upper layers. The<br />
large volume and greater biomass represent the superior establishment <strong>of</strong> the roots aiding the<br />
sorghum plants to better absorb the water and nutrients from the soil. The negative association<br />
<strong>of</strong> the root diameter with the grain yield (-0.41) is because the spreading <strong>of</strong> roots in the upper<br />
layers <strong>of</strong> the soil regime is not beneficial to plant growth.<br />
407 | Page Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Conclusion<br />
Yield is a variable dependent on the crucial physiological and root parameters for efficient<br />
production <strong>of</strong> photoassimilates and their partitioning.<br />
References<br />
Barrs, H.D and Weatherly, P.E. 1962. A re-examination <strong>of</strong> relative turgidity for estimating<br />
water deficits in leaves. Aus. J. Bio. Sci., 413-428.<br />
Barnes, J.D., Blaguer, L., Manrique, E., Elvira, S and Davison,,A.W. 1992. A reappraisal <strong>of</strong><br />
the use <strong>of</strong> DMSO for the extraction and determination <strong>of</strong> chlorophyll a and chlorophyll<br />
b in lichens and higher plants. Env. Exp. Bot., 32:85-100<br />
Kocheva, K., Lambrev, P., Georgiev, G., Goltsev, V. and Karabaliev, M. 2004. Evaluation <strong>of</strong><br />
chlorophyll fluorescence and membrane injury index in the leaves <strong>of</strong> barley cultivars<br />
under osmotic stress. 63: 121-124.<br />
Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance<br />
408 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
T3-34P-1554<br />
Productivity Enhancement <strong>of</strong> Lentil (Lens esculenta Moench) in Rainfed<br />
Agro-ecosystem in Koshi Region <strong>of</strong> Bihar<br />
K.M. Singh 1 *, Md. Nadeem Akhtar 1 and Amarendra Kumar 2<br />
1 Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Agwanpur, Saharsa -852201, Bihar<br />
2 ICAR-ATARI, Zone IV, Patna<br />
*kmsingh66@gmail.com<br />
Lentil (Lens esculenta Moench.) is an important rabi season pulse crop <strong>of</strong> Bihar. Farmers<br />
generally go for sole and paira cropping <strong>of</strong> lentils under low fertility and poorly managed soil<br />
in rainfed agro-ecosystem in the Koshi region resulting in poor yield <strong>of</strong> the crop. These areas<br />
are also vulnerable to drought and flood. The present investigation conducted as an On-Farm<br />
trial on farmer’s fields during 2019-20 & 2021-22 revealed that the technology <strong>of</strong> Improved<br />
variety (HUL 57) + Recommended Fertilizer (20:40.:20 kg N: P: K/ha) + Bi<strong>of</strong>ertilizer<br />
(Rhizobium and PSB@ 1 liter/ha) + Boron 1 kg ai/ha enhanced the productivity <strong>of</strong> lentil from<br />
the farmers level <strong>of</strong> 6.50 q/ha to the tune <strong>of</strong> 11.50 q/ha. This could be achieved with a better<br />
expression <strong>of</strong> yield contributing factors (branches/ plant, pod/plant, seed/pod, 1000-seed wt.)<br />
due to the balanced nutrition <strong>of</strong> plants. The economics <strong>of</strong> study also realized higher net return<br />
(Rs 38000/-) and B: C ratio (2.94) under the technology option <strong>of</strong> improved variety (HUL 57)<br />
+ RDF+ Bi<strong>of</strong>ertilizer (Rhizobium culture, PSB) + Boron 1 kg ai/ha in comparison to farmer’s<br />
practice. The application <strong>of</strong> recommended fertilizer along with bi<strong>of</strong>ertilizer (Rhizobium &<br />
PSB) has also contributed to improvement in soil fertility parameters.<br />
T3-35P-1426<br />
Productivity Enhancement Using Drought Tolerant Banana Variety<br />
Through Frontline Demonstrations in Perambalur District <strong>of</strong> Tamilnadu<br />
V. Sangeetha, V.E. Nethaji Mariyappn and M. Punithavathi<br />
Indian Council <strong>of</strong> Agricultural Research Hans Roever KVK, Perambalur District, Tamil Nadu<br />
Banana is an important fruit crop in Kurumbalur village <strong>of</strong> Perambalur district, Tamil Nadu.<br />
The productivity is low due to occurrence <strong>of</strong> drought during critical period <strong>of</strong> growth stage <strong>of</strong><br />
banana. Also, major part <strong>of</strong> the village is affected with saline irrigation water. Thus affects the<br />
soil properties and inhibit the uptake <strong>of</strong> nutrients and leads to reduction in yield. Therefore,<br />
efforts have been made to demonstrate improved drought tolerant banana variety ‘Kavery saba’<br />
to increase productivity which is also suitable for saline, sodic and marginal soils through front<br />
line demonstration. The variety Kaveri saba was released by NRC Banana, Trichy during the<br />
year 2019. The present study was carried out by Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Perambalur, Tamil<br />
Nadu to assess the impact <strong>of</strong> popularization <strong>of</strong> Banana variety Kaveri saba. Results showed<br />
409 | Page Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
that, the Banana variety Kaveri saba was performed well in Kurumbalur hamlets <strong>of</strong> Perambalur<br />
district also given the high yield under less irrigated condition during rabi season (2020-22).<br />
An average yield <strong>of</strong> 468.56 q ha -1 was recorded in front line demonstration and in farmer<br />
practices it was just 392.23 q ha -1 . Thus, the average technology gap, extension gap and<br />
technology index <strong>of</strong> 121.44, 76.33 and 20.50 percent were observed between demonstration<br />
and farmer practices. The average yield <strong>of</strong> banana increased by 20.58 percent over farmers'<br />
practices. Moreover, farmers inferred that the fruits have high market preference and fetching<br />
premium price owing to its good keeping quality with green life <strong>of</strong> 7-8 days.<br />
T3-36P-1240<br />
Response <strong>of</strong> Clusterbean (Gum Gaur) Genotypes to Planting Geometry in<br />
Rainfed Conditions<br />
R. A. Nandagavi 1 *, S. B. Patil 1 , V. S. Surakod 1 , M. S. Shirahatti 1 , M. A. Gaddanakeri 1 ,<br />
H. S. Patil 1 and G. Ravindra Chary 2<br />
1 AICRPDA, RARS, Vijayapura-586101 (UAS, Dharwad), Karnataka, India<br />
2 AICRPDA, ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad 500059, Telangana, India<br />
* nandagavira@uasd.in<br />
Cluster bean (Cyamopsis tetragonoloba (L.) is popularly known as guar, chavli kayi, guari,<br />
khutti etc in local languages <strong>of</strong> southern India. Dry regions <strong>of</strong> West Africa as well as India are<br />
considered as centres <strong>of</strong> origin <strong>of</strong> cluster bean though diverse opinion on exact origin <strong>of</strong> cluster<br />
bean is still prevails. It is characterized as a short-day erect or bushy annual plant (Purseglove,<br />
1981). It is a drought tolerant, warm season legume crop with deep and well-developed root<br />
system, cultivated mainly as rainfed crop in arid and semi-arid regions during rainy (kharif)<br />
season for vegetable, galactomannan gum, forage and green manure. Cluster bean is mainly<br />
cultivated for food, feed and fodder (Reddy et al., 2017). North Eastern part <strong>of</strong> Karnataka<br />
experiences frequent and intermittent droughts coupled with high temperature. The farmers are<br />
following the traditional cropping system <strong>of</strong> Rabi sorghum-sunflower production system. The<br />
market price <strong>of</strong> Rabi sorghum is very low and that <strong>of</strong> sunflower is very much fluctuating and<br />
<strong>of</strong>ten gets infected with powdery mildew. The variation in market price results in loss to the<br />
farmers and even they are unable to meet out the cost <strong>of</strong> cultivation. Rabi sorghum is the main<br />
food crop <strong>of</strong> the Northern Karnataka. Hence farmers are growing rabi sorghum for food<br />
requirement and fodder to their livestock. Apart from growing Rabi sorghum, there is a scope<br />
for introduction <strong>of</strong> cluster bean (gum type) so that the farmers can get an additional income<br />
apart from food grains. Keeping the above in mind the present investigation was taken up to<br />
evaluate and identify the suitable genotype and to standardize the suitable planting geometry.<br />
Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance<br />
410 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Methodology<br />
This study was carried out to assess the feasibility <strong>of</strong> introduction <strong>of</strong> cluster bean under dryland<br />
conditions during kharif seasons for three years (2016 to 2018) at Regional Agricultural<br />
Research Station (RARS), Vijayapura (Karnataka). The experiment was laid out in split plot<br />
design with six spacings in main plot viz., S 1: 30×10cm, S 2: 45×10cm, S 3: 45×15cm,<br />
S4:45×20cm, S5: 60×10cm and S6: 60×20cm and four genotypes <strong>of</strong> cluster bean viz., V1: RGC<br />
938, V 2: RGC 1033, V 3: RGC 1038 and V 4: RGC 1066 in subplots. Recommended fertilizer<br />
dose and cultural practices including need-based plant protection measures were followed to<br />
raise a good crop. Observations from five randomly selected plants <strong>of</strong> each genotype in each<br />
replication were recorded. The mean <strong>of</strong> three years values was used for statistical analysis and<br />
they are presented.<br />
Results<br />
The plant height, number <strong>of</strong> pods per plant, grain yield (kg/ha), benefit cost ratio (B:C ratio)<br />
and rain water use efficiency (RWUE) were estimated using the pooled data <strong>of</strong> three years.<br />
Among the crop geometry tried, cluster bean sown at 30 cm×10 cm gave significantly higher<br />
grain yield <strong>of</strong> 408 kg per ha as compared to 45 cm×15 cm (361 kg/ha), 45cm×20cm (293<br />
kg/ha), 60cm×10cm (275 kg/ha) and 60cm×20cm (229 kg/ha). But it was on par with<br />
45cm×10cm (401 kg/ha). The B:C ratio and RWUE was also significantly higher in above said<br />
treatment. Whereas, pods per plant were significantly higher in less dense treatment. Among<br />
four cluster bean genotypes, RC 1033 and RC 938 recorded significantly higher grain yield<br />
(345 and 341 kg/ha, respectively) than other genotypes. The cost benefit ratio and rain water<br />
use efficiency was also significantly higher in these genotypes. The genotypes RGC 938 and<br />
RGC 1033 was significantly taller and smaller, respectively compared to other<br />
genotypes. Number <strong>of</strong> pods per plant were significantly less in genotype RGC 1066.<br />
Influence <strong>of</strong> spacing and genotypes on growth, yield, economics and RWUE <strong>of</strong> cluster<br />
bean<br />
Plant<br />
Seed yield<br />
RWUE<br />
Treatment<br />
Pods/plant<br />
B:C ratio<br />
height<br />
(kg/ha)<br />
(kg/ha-mm)<br />
Spacing (S)<br />
S1: 30X10cm 23.03 9.8 408 8.09 1.72<br />
S2: 45X10cm 23.78 9.7 401 7.95 1.69<br />
S3: 45X15cm 24.08 10.5 361 7.16 1.41<br />
S4: 45X20cm 22.54 10.4 293 5.81 1.25<br />
S5: 60X10cm 22.52 9.5 275 5.46 1.13<br />
S6: 60X20cm 21.85 11.3 229 4.55 0.88<br />
S.Em ± 0.21 0.2 8 0.15 0.04<br />
CD(p=0.05) 0.64 0.5 23 0.47 0.12<br />
411 | Page Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Genotypes (V)<br />
V1: RGC 938 24.01 10.3 341 6.76 1.41<br />
V2: RGC 1033 21.96 10.7 345 6.85 1.41<br />
V3: RGC 1038 23.20 10.7 327 6.48 1.32<br />
V4: RGC 1066 22.71 9.1 298 5.91 1.24<br />
S.Em ± 0.23 0.1 3 0.07 0.02<br />
CD(p=0.05) 0.67 0.4 10 0.20 0.05<br />
Interactions (S×V) * * * * *<br />
Among the interactions, the genotypes RC 1033, RC 938 and RGC 1038 performed well<br />
under 45×10cm and 30×10cm geometry and produced significantly higher seed yield<br />
compared to other combinations. Similar trend was observed with respect to economics<br />
and RWUE. The genotype RC 1033 and RGC-938 showed superiority over the rest due to<br />
production <strong>of</strong> more pods per plant by utilisation <strong>of</strong> rain water more efficiently, which leads to<br />
effective translocation and distribution <strong>of</strong> photosynthates from source to sink in turn more pod<br />
yield per plant. Similar kind <strong>of</strong> observations made by Satpal et al. (2020) and Gangadhara<br />
(2013) in case <strong>of</strong> cluster bean.<br />
Interaction effect <strong>of</strong> spacing and genotypes on yield <strong>of</strong> cluster bean<br />
Spacing/Genotypes<br />
V1: RGC<br />
938<br />
V2: RGC<br />
1033<br />
V3: RGC<br />
1038<br />
V4: RGC<br />
1066<br />
S1: 30×10cm 431 427 423 354 408<br />
S2: 45×10cm 427 459 429 287 401<br />
S3: 45×15cm 381 392 344 326 361<br />
S4: 45×20cm 266 302 290 313 293<br />
S5: 60×10cm 287 294 260 260 275<br />
S6: 60×20cm 253 201 215 248 229<br />
Mean 341 345 327 298<br />
For comparing S. Em± CD (0.05)<br />
Spacing 8 23<br />
Genotypes 3 10<br />
Spacing at same or different<br />
Genotypes 10 32<br />
Conclusion<br />
The study concluded that the crop geometry <strong>of</strong> 30 × 10 cm and 45 × 10 cm is ideal for cluster<br />
bean genotypes RC 1033 and RGC-938 for getting higher yield and economic returns in<br />
northern dry zone <strong>of</strong> Karnataka.<br />
Mea<br />
n<br />
Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance<br />
412 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
References<br />
Gangadhara, T. C. 2013. Evaluation <strong>of</strong> elite cluster bean [Cyamopsis tetragonoloba (L.) taub.]<br />
genotypes for vegetable and gum purpose in the northern dry zone <strong>of</strong> Karnataka. M. Sc.<br />
(Hort) Thesis, University <strong>of</strong> Horiculture Sciences, Bagalkot (India).<br />
Purseglove, J. W. 1981. Leguminosae. Tropical Crops: Dicotyledons. Longman Group Ltd,<br />
Essex, U. K. Pp- 250-254.<br />
Reddy Rajashekar Dodla, Saidaiah, P., Reddy Ravinder, K., and Pandravada, S. R. 2017. Mean<br />
performance <strong>of</strong> Cluster Bean Genotypes for Yield, Yield Parameters and Quality Traits.<br />
Int. j. curr. microbiol. appl. sci. 6(9): 3685-3693.<br />
Satpal, Panchta R., Arya, S., Singh, D. P., Suresh Kumar, and Neelam. 2020. Performance <strong>of</strong><br />
cluster bean genotypes as influenced by crop geometry and fertilizer levels. Forage Res.<br />
45 (4): 314-317.<br />
T3-37P-1245<br />
Screening Maize Inbred Lines Developed from Local Germplasm for<br />
Excess Moisture Tolerance<br />
E. Lamalakshmi Devi 1* , Krishnappa Rangappa 2 , Ayam Gangarani 3 , Ch. Chinglen<br />
Meetei 1 , Yankey Bhutia 1 , Harendra Verma 4 , B. U. Choudhury 2 and R. Laha 1<br />
1 ICAR-RC- NEH Region, Sikkim Centre, Tadong, Sikkim, India;<br />
2 ICAR RC NEHR, Umiam, Meghalaya, India;<br />
3 ICAR-RC- NEH Region, Lembucherra, Tripura, India;<br />
4 ICAR-RC- NEH Region, Medzhiphema, Nagaland, India<br />
* elangbamlama@gmail.com<br />
North- Eastern regions <strong>of</strong> India are the biodiversity hub for many crops but these regions are<br />
<strong>of</strong>ten exposed to adverse climatic conditions like flood, drought, cold, soil acidity, etc. During<br />
the monsoon season, farmers <strong>of</strong>ten faced flooding condition/ soil saturation due to heavy<br />
rainfall and during the rabi season, drought/ water scarcity is the main challenge. The<br />
vegetative stage is considered one <strong>of</strong> the most critical periods affected under waterlogged<br />
conditions. In maize, Root System Architecture (RSA) is a key determinant <strong>of</strong> nutrient and<br />
water uptake efficiency (Liu et al. 2017) and thus, root traits are emerging as effective<br />
parameters that can be targeted for screening genotypes tolerant to waterlogged condition in<br />
maize. It is promising to manipulate RSA towards distribution <strong>of</strong> roots to optimize water and<br />
nutrient uptake under stressful condition. Keeping in view the existence <strong>of</strong> different local<br />
landraces <strong>of</strong> maize adapted in highly rainfall areas <strong>of</strong> the region, the present study was<br />
undertaken to phenotype and screen the diverse landraces <strong>of</strong> maize collected from different<br />
413 | Page Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
parts <strong>of</strong> North-Eastern region <strong>of</strong> India based on root architecture for their tolerance to<br />
waterlogged condition at vegetative stage.<br />
Methodology<br />
A total <strong>of</strong> 37 inbred lines (32 from ICAR, Sikkim Centre and 5 from ICAR-IIMR, Ludhiana)<br />
were used for the present study. The evaluation <strong>of</strong> landraces for waterlogging tolerance at V 5-<br />
6 stage was undertaken under 2 sets <strong>of</strong> experiments viz., field and microcosm in 2 replications<br />
at Research farm <strong>of</strong> ICAR-RC-NEH Region, Sikkim Centre during 2022. For screening,<br />
artificial flooding was provided at V 5-6 stage to a depth <strong>of</strong> 20cm above the soil surface<br />
continuously for 15 days and data are recorded based on maize Shovelomics. The “Response<br />
Coefficient” (RC) as phenotypic plasticity index (Poorter and Nagel 2000, Abenavoli et al.<br />
2016) and Waterlogging Tolerance Index (WTC) (Liu et al. 2010) were calculated.<br />
Results<br />
Root scanner images <strong>of</strong> the roots <strong>of</strong> inbred lines showed sharp differences between the control<br />
and waterlogged conditions. Based on visual scoring <strong>of</strong> root architecture using Shovelomics,<br />
score ranged from 1 to 9 for the traits brace roots angle (BA), brace roots branching density<br />
(BB), crown roots number (CN), crown root s angle (CA) and crown roots branching (CB).<br />
Some <strong>of</strong> the promising lines identified based on WTC and RC values from the 1 st year trail<br />
were UMI-1810, IML-418-1, RCS-31(Mani-31-2-2), RCS-29 (Mizo-29-4-1), RCS-4 (Mani-4-<br />
1-1) and RCS-21(Mizo-21(B)-2-3).<br />
Root scanner images <strong>of</strong> roots <strong>of</strong> maize inbred lines under waterlogged and control conditions<br />
Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance<br />
414 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Images <strong>of</strong> brace roots angle (BA), brace roots branching density (BB), crown roots number (CN),<br />
crown root s angle (CA) and crown roots branching (CB) displayed were scored with 1, 3, 5, 7 and 9<br />
Conclusion<br />
The maize inbred lines used in the present study were developed from the genetic resources <strong>of</strong><br />
NEH regions. Diverse maize landraces showing distinct and unique traits with high ability to<br />
face extreme weather conditions are reported from this region and these genotypes are being<br />
utilized for developing inbred lines. These lines needs to be screened for various abiotic stresses<br />
including excess moisture stress for developing hybrids tolerant to excess moisture conditions.<br />
References<br />
Abenavoli, M. R., Leone, M., Sunseri, F., Bacchi, M. and Sorgona, A. 2016. Root phenotyping<br />
for drought tolerance in bean landraces from Calabria (Italy). J Agron Crop Sci. 202(1):<br />
1–12.<br />
Liu, Y.Z., Bin, T., Zheng, Y. L., Xu, S. Z. and Qiu, F. Z. 2010. Screening methods for<br />
waterlogging tolerance at maize (Zea mays L.) seedling stage. Agricultural Sciences<br />
in China. 9(3): 362-369.<br />
Liu, Z., Gao, K., Shan, S., Gu, R., Wang, Z., Craft, E. J., Mi, G., Yuan, L. and Chen, F. 2017.<br />
Comparative Analysis <strong>of</strong> Root Traits and the Associated QTLs for Maize Seedlings<br />
Grown in Paper Roll, Hydroponics and Vermiculite Culture System. Front. Plant Sci.<br />
8:436. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.00436<br />
Poorter, H. and Nagel, O. 2000. The role <strong>of</strong> biomass allocation in the growth response <strong>of</strong> plants<br />
to different levels <strong>of</strong> light, CO2, nutrients and water. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 27: 595–<br />
607.<br />
415 | Page Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance<br />
T3-38P-1241<br />
Study on Inter-Relation <strong>of</strong> Yield and The Associated Traits in Maize<br />
Hybrids Under Rainfed Conditions<br />
K.R.V. Sathya Sheela 1* , S. Lakshmi Narayanan 2 , R. Radhajeyalakshmi 1 , T. Selvakumar 1<br />
and N. Satheesh Kumar 1<br />
1 Maize Research Station, TNAU, Vagarai 624 613, Tamil Nadu, India<br />
2 AC&RI, Madurai, TNAU, Coimbatore 641003, Tamil Nadu, India<br />
*sathyakrv@yahoo.co.in<br />
Maize (Zea mays L.), known as ‘queen <strong>of</strong> cereals’ is the third important food crop after rice<br />
and wheat. In addition to staple food for human being and quality feed for animals, maize<br />
serves as a basic raw material as an ingredient to thousands <strong>of</strong> industrial products that includes<br />
starch, oil, protein, alcoholic beverages, food sweeteners, pharmaceutical, cosmetic, film,<br />
textile, gum, package and paper industries etc. It is grown under wider agro-climatic<br />
conditions. Selection <strong>of</strong> promising genotypes and planning management practices to improve<br />
yield is a challenging issue under rainfed conditions. Spatio-temporal variations in rainfall and<br />
temperature affects maize production (Premalatha and Kalamani, 2010). Water limitation has<br />
adverse effect on yield and the development <strong>of</strong> hybrids with reasonable level <strong>of</strong> drought<br />
tolerance is essential for sustainable maize production under water limited conditions.<br />
Reduction in grain yield and yield components <strong>of</strong> maize hybrids under stress conditions is <strong>of</strong>ten<br />
correlated with changes <strong>of</strong> some phenotypic expressions. This study aimed to assess the<br />
responses <strong>of</strong> grain yield and important phenotypic characteristics <strong>of</strong> maize hybrids under water<br />
limited conditions.<br />
Methodology<br />
The experimental study was conducted at Maize Research Station, Vagarai during October -<br />
January 2021. In this study, 19 hybrids from newly developed crosses along with two checks<br />
were evaluated in two replications in Randomized Block Design under rainfed conditions. The<br />
biometrical traits viz., plant height, ear height, days to to 50% tasseling, days to 50% silking,<br />
anthesis silking interval, cob length, no <strong>of</strong> rows per cob, hundred seed weight, shelling<br />
percentage and grain yield were recorded. Correlation among the traits was studied using<br />
TNAU Stat statistical package.<br />
Results<br />
Grain yield, as a complex variable, can reflect the interaction <strong>of</strong> the environment and<br />
management with the growth and development processes that occur throughout the crop’s<br />
maturation cycle (Adnan et al., 2020 and Premalatha et al., 2010) and in addition, yield<br />
component traits adjust their expressions to determine grain yield under different<br />
416 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
environmental and agronomic conditions. Genotypic correlations among the yield and the<br />
biometrical traits were studied.<br />
Trait<br />
s<br />
EH<br />
DAT<br />
DAS<br />
ASI<br />
CL<br />
NRC<br />
HSW<br />
SP<br />
GY<br />
Correlation <strong>of</strong> yield and the associated traits under rainfed conditions<br />
PH EH DAT DAS ASI CL NRC HSW SP<br />
0.7952<br />
**<br />
-<br />
0.8227<br />
**<br />
-<br />
0.9291<br />
**<br />
-<br />
0.7016<br />
**<br />
0.8998<br />
**<br />
0.8576<br />
**<br />
0.8009<br />
**<br />
0.8244<br />
**<br />
0.8415<br />
**<br />
-<br />
0.8159<br />
**<br />
-<br />
0.9511<br />
**<br />
-<br />
0.7507<br />
**<br />
0.7585<br />
**<br />
0.6496<br />
**<br />
0.7697<br />
**<br />
0.4365<br />
*<br />
0.5137<br />
**<br />
1<br />
0.862*<br />
*<br />
0.3603<br />
*<br />
-<br />
0.7914<br />
**<br />
1<br />
-0.3256<br />
0.7834<br />
**<br />
-<br />
0.783*<br />
*<br />
-<br />
0.4877<br />
*<br />
1<br />
0.2077 -0.1836<br />
-0.3278<br />
-<br />
0.497*<br />
*<br />
-<br />
0.508*<br />
*<br />
-<br />
0.804*<br />
*<br />
-<br />
0.4719<br />
*<br />
-<br />
0.4984<br />
**<br />
-<br />
0.592*<br />
*<br />
-<br />
0.5362<br />
**<br />
417 | Page Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance<br />
1<br />
-0.87**<br />
0.9999<br />
**<br />
0.9248<br />
**<br />
0.8655<br />
**<br />
0.7958<br />
**<br />
1<br />
0.5051<br />
**<br />
0.8108<br />
**<br />
0.9889<br />
**<br />
1<br />
0.9999<br />
**<br />
0.8762<br />
**<br />
1<br />
0.9999<br />
**<br />
* Significance at 1 % level; ** Significance at 1 % level; Plant Height (PH); Ear height (EH); Days to 50%<br />
tasselling (DAT); Days to 50% silking (DAS); Anthesis Silking Interval (ASI); Cob length (CL); No <strong>of</strong> rows per<br />
cob (NRC); Hundred seed weight (HSW); Shelling % (SP); Grain Yield (GY).<br />
The range <strong>of</strong> the grain yield varied from 5167 kg/ha to 7450 kg/ha. The hybrid VAH 21007<br />
recorded highest yield <strong>of</strong> 7450 kg/ha under rainfed conditions. Plant height, ear height, cob<br />
length, number <strong>of</strong> rows per cob, hundred seed weight and shelling percentage exhibited positive<br />
association with yield at 1% significance level. Days to 50% tasselling and days to 50% silking<br />
showed negative association with yield at 1% significance level. Cob length had positive<br />
association with number <strong>of</strong> rows per cob, hundred seed weight and shelling percentage. Maize<br />
is a cross pollinated crop and the prolonging <strong>of</strong> Anthesis to silking interval will lead to poor<br />
seed set and it is proved by the negative association <strong>of</strong> ASI with yield. Water stress during<br />
1
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
flowering will lead to delay in silking which will ultimately increase the anthesis to silking<br />
interval and poor seed set (Bharathi et al., 2021). Hence selection <strong>of</strong> genotypes with shorter<br />
ASI, smaller tassels and stay green traits will assist in breeding for water stress conditions.<br />
Water stress during anthesis and silking reduces yield.<br />
Conclusion<br />
The knowledge on the association <strong>of</strong> yield and its components is <strong>of</strong> the great importance in<br />
breeding. Hence low ASI and the cob characters viz., cob length, number <strong>of</strong> rows per cob,<br />
number <strong>of</strong> kernels per row, shelling percentage can be given more importance in selection<br />
criteria under rainfed conditions as they are contributing to yield.<br />
References<br />
Adnan, A. A., Diels, J., Jibrin, J. M., Kamara, A. Y., Shaibu, A. S., Craufurd, P., and Menkir,<br />
A. 2020. CERES-Maize model for simulating genotype – by- environment interaction<br />
<strong>of</strong> maize and its stability in the dry and wet savannas <strong>of</strong> Nigeria. Field Crops Res. 253,<br />
107826.<br />
Bharathi, P., Ravikesavan, R., Yuvaraja, A., Iyanar, K. and Manikanda Boopathi, N. 2021.<br />
Genetic variability and correlation in maize inbred lines under irrigated and moisture<br />
stress condition. Electron. J. Plant Breed. 12(3): 928-933<br />
Premalatha, M., and Kalamani, A. 2010. Correlation studies in maize (Zea maysL.) Int. J. Plant<br />
Sci. 5(1) :376-380.<br />
T3-39P-1088<br />
Transpiration Efficiency in Hybrid and Open Pollinated Variety <strong>of</strong> Pearl<br />
Millet<br />
N.M. Vanaja, B. Sarkar, S. K. Yadav, P. Sathish, Amol Patil,<br />
K. Salini, Arun K. Shanker and V.K. Singh<br />
Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, Hyderabad 500059, Telangana, India<br />
Worldwide, agriculture consumes over 70% <strong>of</strong> fresh water resources used annually (Bacon,<br />
2004). The rapid decline in fresh water resources, coupled with the demand for increased food<br />
production to meet the population growth, poses a great challenge to agriculture. To maintain<br />
or further increase agriculture output depends in part on the efficient management <strong>of</strong> water to<br />
maximize water productivity, the concept <strong>of</strong> assessing agricultural output based on water<br />
consumed rather than land area. Improvement in transpiration efficiency (TE), the inherent<br />
water use efficiency, defined as biomass produced per unit water transpired through plants,<br />
may be another viable approach to increase water productivity. Having higher TE could<br />
Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance<br />
418 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
contribute to a lower rate <strong>of</strong> soil moisture depletion. In general, plants with the C4<br />
photosynthesis pathway are more efficient in water use than plants with the C 3 photosynthesis<br />
pathway (Bacon, 2004). Differences in TE among species are well known. However, variation<br />
in TE within a species has been reported in maize (Jyothi et al., 2020) and blakgram (Jyothi et<br />
al., 2017). As a C 4 crop, pearl millet possesses high TE and is well adapted to semi-arid<br />
environments. Hybrid (ICMH-356) and open pollinated variety (OPV, ICMV-221) were<br />
evaluated to understand the variations in water use and transpiration efficiency from sowing to<br />
grain harvest (during Kharif in rainout shelter facility). The experiment was a completely<br />
randomized block design with five replications. Growth observations and water balance in pots<br />
quantified components <strong>of</strong> whole-plant TE.<br />
Methodology<br />
Transpiration efficiency was determined by gravimetric method with modifications. Whole<br />
plant level TE was determined gravimetrically in 15 litres plastic pots filled with a mixture <strong>of</strong><br />
red soil and farm yard manure. Recommended dose <strong>of</strong> fertilizer was used. Two seeds were<br />
planted per pot and thinned to one plant at 7 days after emergence. The pots were then covered<br />
from both ends with poly bags. A slit was cut in the top bag to permit seedling growth. The slit<br />
was further sealed with a piece <strong>of</strong> clear adhesive tape. The poly bags were tightly fixed onto<br />
the pots with an elastic band. The initial weight recorded. The pots were weighed every 3 days<br />
(from 7 days after covering with poly bags) and measured quantity <strong>of</strong> water was supplemented<br />
through a funnel placed into the poly bag and again sealed with tape after watering. When the<br />
plants reached maturity, they were harvested at soil level and final pot weight was recorded.<br />
Individually plants were partitioned into leaves, stems and cobs and the dry weight was<br />
recorded. Total water transpired was calculated by subtracting the final pot weight from the<br />
initial weight and then adding the amount <strong>of</strong> water that has been applied at regular intervals.<br />
TE biomass and TE seed was calculated by dividing the above ground dry biomass and seed yield<br />
by the amount <strong>of</strong> water transpired.<br />
Results<br />
The water transpired was 19.02 l/p and 20.84 l/p for OPV (ICMV-221) and Hybrid (ICMH-<br />
356) for the total growth period. The total biomass was 67.3 g/p and 107.9 g/p and seed yield<br />
was 30.81 and 43.6 g/pl for OPV and hybrid respectively. In OPV, TE biomass and TE seed yield<br />
was 3.54 (g biomass/1 water) and 1.61 (g seed/ l water) and increased to 5.17 and 2.09<br />
respectively in hybrid. TEbiomass and TEseed (biomass/seed produced per unit <strong>of</strong> water transpired)<br />
in hybrid improved by 46.0% and 29.8% respectively. High TE in hybrid was due to enhanced<br />
biomass production (60.3%) and seed yield (41.5%) with extra water use (9.6%) as compared<br />
to OPV (ICMV-221).<br />
419 | Page Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Total biomass, seed yield, water transpired and TE in hybrid and OPV <strong>of</strong> pearl millet.<br />
Parameters ICMV-221(OPV) ICMH-356 (Hybrid)<br />
Total biomass (g/plant 67.3 107.9 (60.3%)<br />
Seed yield (g/plant) 30.81 43.6 (41.5%)<br />
Water transpired (L/Plant) 19.02 20.84 (9.6%<br />
TE biomass (g biomass/ L water) 3.54 5.17 (46.0%)<br />
TE seed yield (g seed/ L water) 1.61 2.09 (29.8%)<br />
TR biomass (L water/ kg seed) 289.7 194.6 (-32.8%)<br />
TR seed yield (L water/ kg seed) 639 479.4 (-25.0%<br />
Values in parenthesis are % increase or decrease over OPV<br />
120<br />
Total biomass<br />
22<br />
Water transpired (L/plant)<br />
6<br />
Transpiration effficiency<br />
100<br />
20<br />
5<br />
Biomass (g/plant)<br />
80<br />
60<br />
40<br />
20<br />
Water transpired (L/Plant)<br />
18<br />
16<br />
14<br />
12<br />
TE (g dry wt. /L water)<br />
4<br />
3<br />
2<br />
1<br />
0<br />
ICMV-221<br />
ICMH-356<br />
10<br />
ICMV-221<br />
ICMH-356<br />
0<br />
ICMV-221<br />
ICMH-356<br />
Seed wt Husk Leaf stem<br />
Shoot TE<br />
Seed TE<br />
Total biomass, seed yield and transpiration efficiency in pearl millet hybrid (ICMH-356) and OPV<br />
(ICMV-221)<br />
Conclusion<br />
Transpiration ratio (TR) which is the ratio <strong>of</strong> amount <strong>of</strong> water transpired by a plant during its<br />
growing season to the weight <strong>of</strong> seed produced, decreased from 639 L H 2O/kg seed in OPV to<br />
479.4 L H2O/kg seed in hybrid. Results clearly show that 25% less water was transpired to produce<br />
a kilogram seed suggesting that less water will be required for hybrid compared to open pollinated<br />
variety. Hybrids have high TE compared to open pollinated varieties.<br />
References<br />
Bacon, M.A., 2004. Water Use Efficiency in Plant Biology. Blackwell Publishing Ltd., Boca<br />
Raton, FL.<br />
Jyothi Lakshmi, N., Vanaja, M., Yadav, S. K., Amol Patil, Ram Prasad, Ch., Sathish, P., Salini,<br />
K., Arun K.Shanker and Maheswari, M. 2020. Assessing genetic diversity <strong>of</strong> maize<br />
genotypes for transpiration efficiency. Electron. J. Plant Breed. Vol 11(3):822-830.<br />
Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance<br />
420 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Jyothi Lakshmi, N., Vanaja, M., Yadav, S. K., Amol Patil, Ram Prasad, Ch., Sathish, P., Vijay<br />
Kumar, Vagheera, Salini K., and Maheswari, M. 2017. Genetic variability for grain<br />
yield and water use efficiency in blackgram genotypes. J. Appl. Nat. Sci. 9 (3): 1592-<br />
97.<br />
T3-40P-1086<br />
Variability in Growth and Yield Responses <strong>of</strong> Four Blackgram Genotypes<br />
at Elevated CO2<br />
M.Vanaja*, P. Sathish, B. Sarkar, N. Jyothi Lakshmi, A. Sushma, Ch. Mohan,<br />
S.K. Yadav, M. Prabhakar and V.K. Singh<br />
Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, Hyderabad 500059, Telangana, India<br />
* m.vanaja@icar.gov.in; vanajamaddi@gmail.com<br />
The earth atmospheric CO2 concentration continuously rising, and the current levels have<br />
reached 411 ppm (https://climate.nasa.gov/vital-signs/carbon-dioxi de/). The impact <strong>of</strong><br />
elevated CO2 (eCO2) was positive with C3 crops especially legumes for both biomass and seed<br />
yield as compared to C 4 cereal crops. The eCO 2 brings about an increase in photosynthetic<br />
rates, growth, development, and yield <strong>of</strong> a wide range <strong>of</strong> cultivated crops (Pan et al., 2018).<br />
The productivity <strong>of</strong> most agricultural crops increases under eCO2 in the range <strong>of</strong> 15 to 41% for<br />
C3 crops and 5 to 10% for C4 crops (Kimball, 2011). For nutritional security, especially for<br />
the vegetarian population inclusion <strong>of</strong> pulses is essential. Blackgram (Vigna mungo L.) also<br />
called as urad is the ‘King <strong>of</strong> pulses’ and is considered as originated in India. It belongs to the<br />
Leguminosae family and in India, it is grown in 3.5 million hectares with a production <strong>of</strong><br />
around 2.0 million tonnes. The present study was aimed at the quantification <strong>of</strong> the biomass<br />
and yield responses <strong>of</strong> this important pulse crop to eCO 2 and variability in genotypes with high<br />
yield potential.<br />
Methodology<br />
To assess the impact <strong>of</strong> eCO 2 on growth and yield <strong>of</strong> four blackgram (Vigna mungo L.)<br />
genotypes (IPU-06-02, PLU-826, PSRJ-95016 and IPU- 94-1), a field experiment was<br />
conducted in Open Top Chamber (OTC) facility during Kharif 2022. The OTC facility consists<br />
6 chambers <strong>of</strong> 3m × 3m × 3m and two <strong>of</strong> them were maintained at ambient CO2 (aCO 2) and<br />
four at eCO2 <strong>of</strong> 550ppm (Vanaja et al., 2016). The observations were recorded on phenology<br />
<strong>of</strong> flowering, physiological, biomass and yield parameters.<br />
Results<br />
The phenology <strong>of</strong> 50% flowering was early under eCO2 condition by 2.0 (PLU-826) to 3.7<br />
days (PSRJ-95016) as compared with ambient condition. The eCO 2 condition improved Net<br />
421 | Page Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Assimilation, Anet (17%) and water use efficiency, WUE (19%) and reduced the stomatal<br />
conductance, gs (24%), and transpiration, Tr (3%) <strong>of</strong> blackgram genotypes than at aCO 2.<br />
Among the four selected genotypes, IPU-06-02 registered highest response to eCO 2 for all<br />
these physiological parameters. The improvement <strong>of</strong> total biomass with eCO2 ranged from 22%<br />
(IPU- 94-1) to 30% (IPU-06-02) and seed yield from 27% (PSRJ-95016) to 45% (IPU- 94-1).<br />
The improved seed yield was mainly contributed by increased per plant pod number (24%),<br />
number <strong>of</strong> seeds (19%) and 100 seed weight (12%) indicating that the enhanced CO 2<br />
concentration with improved assimilative capacity increasing pod set as well as seed filling.<br />
The presence <strong>of</strong> eCO2 improved both vegetative and reproductive biomass and impacted the<br />
proportion <strong>of</strong> enhanced biomass towards seed. It was observed that the overall impact <strong>of</strong> eCO 2<br />
on this pulse crop was higher for reproductive biomass (32%) than vegetative biomass (22%)<br />
and this was reflected in improved harvest index, HI (3.6%). Similarly, Ziska and Blowsky<br />
(2007) also reported a significant increase in pod number, pod weight, and total seed weight at<br />
elevated CO2 concentration in mung beans.<br />
Improvement <strong>of</strong> physiological parameters in black gram with eCO2.<br />
Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance<br />
422 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Conclusion<br />
Improvement <strong>of</strong> biomass and yield parameters in black gram with eCO2.<br />
The elevated CO 2 <strong>of</strong> 550ppm reduced the days to flowering and improved the physiological<br />
performance, biomass, and seed yield <strong>of</strong> the blackgram crop. However, the selected four<br />
blackgram genotypes showed differential responses for physiological, biomass, and yield<br />
parameters with eCO 2. The highest response to eCO 2 for physiological parameters was with<br />
genotype IPU-06-02, for vegetative biomass was with PLU-826, and seed yield with IPU- 94-<br />
1. The improvement in seed yield was due to the increased number <strong>of</strong> pods, seeds and test<br />
weight revealing that the eCO2 condition provided a beneficial impact through increased pod<br />
set and seed filling <strong>of</strong> this C3 leguminous crop.<br />
References<br />
Kimball, B. A. 2011. Lessons from FACE: CO2 Effects and Interactions with Water,<br />
Nitrogen, and Temperature. In: Hillel, D. and Rosenzweig, C., Eds., Handbook <strong>of</strong><br />
Climate Change and Agroecosystems: Impacts, Adaptation, and Mitigation, Imperial<br />
College Press, London, 87-107.<br />
Pan, C., Ahammed, G. J., Li, X., and Shi, K. 2018. Elevated CO2 improves photosynthesis<br />
under high temperature by attenuating the functional limitations to energy fluxes,<br />
electron transport and redox homeostasis in tomato leaves. Front. Plant Sci. 9: 1739.<br />
https:// doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.01739.<br />
423 | Page Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Vanaja, M., Maheswari, M., Ratnakumar, P. and Ramakrishna, Y.S. 2006. Monitoring and<br />
controlling <strong>of</strong> CO 2 concentrations in open top chambers for better understanding <strong>of</strong> plants<br />
response to elevated CO 2 levels. Indian J. Radio Space 35: 193-197.<br />
Ziska, L.H. and Blowsky, R. 2007. A quantitative and qualitative assessment <strong>of</strong> mung bean<br />
(Vigna mungo L. Wilczek) seed in response to elevated atmospheric carbon dioxide:<br />
potential changes in fatty acid composition. J. Agric. Food Chem.87: 920-23.<br />
T3-41P-1169<br />
Varietal Performance Arid Fruit Crop Pomegranate under Vidarbha<br />
Region <strong>of</strong> Maharashtra State<br />
R. S. Wankhade 1* , Y. D. Charjan 1 , N. H. Ramteke 2 and H. H. Dikey 3<br />
1<br />
Agriculture Research Station, Dr. P.D.K.V.Achalpur Dist. Amravati- 444805<br />
2<br />
Dr. P.D.K.V., Akola- 444104<br />
3<br />
Regional Research Centre, Dr. P.D.K.V., Amravati Dist. Amravati- 444 603<br />
*rswankhade70@gmail.com<br />
Pomegranate (Punicagranatum L.) is an important arid zone fruit cropand has emerged as a<br />
commercially important fruit crop. However, the performance <strong>of</strong> the plant will be excellent if<br />
maintenance is with protective irrigation. In the recent past, pomegranate has attained export<br />
potential and foreign exchange. Fruits are exported to Europe, Middle East, Africa, America<br />
and Asian countries. It is commercially cultivated in Maharashtra, Karnataka, Gujarat,<br />
Rajasthan, Uttar Pradesh, Andra Pradesh, and Tamil Nadu. The major pomegranate growing<br />
area under rainshadow districts <strong>of</strong> Maharashtra regions particularly Solapur, Sangli, Nashik,<br />
Ahmednagar, Pune, Dhule, Aurangabad, Satara, Osmanabad and Latur. In Vidarbha region<br />
pomegranate cultivation is at infant stage. Many varieties are under cultivation in this region<br />
but evaluation and recommendation regarding their suitability for this zone has not been done.<br />
In this regard, present work was carried out to know promising variety which is suitable to<br />
Vidharbha region <strong>of</strong> Maharashtra state.<br />
Methodology<br />
Field experiment was conducted at Agriculture Research Station, Dr. Panjabrao Deshmukh<br />
Krishi Vidyapeeth, Achalpur, (M.S.), India to select best suited variety for commercial<br />
cultivation under Achalpur condition <strong>of</strong> Amravati district <strong>of</strong> Maharashtra state during 2015-<br />
16 to 2017-18. In this experiment three varieties which are planted in September-2015 at<br />
Agriculture Research Station, Dr. Panjabrao Deshmukh Krishi Vidyapeeth, Achalpur, (M.S.),<br />
farm was Ganesh, Bhagwa and Arakta were selected. The design <strong>of</strong> experimental plot was<br />
Randomized Block Design replicated seven times with two plants per replication. For<br />
observation <strong>of</strong> plant height (cm), diameter <strong>of</strong> stem (cm) and number <strong>of</strong> fruits plant -1 were<br />
Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance<br />
424 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
taken by selecting two plants. Five fruits from each variety were selected for taking<br />
observations <strong>of</strong> weight <strong>of</strong> fruit (g).<br />
Results<br />
It is evident from the data presented in Table and Figure that there was significant varietal<br />
differences in respect <strong>of</strong> growth and yield attributes. The data pertaining to tree and yield<br />
characters <strong>of</strong> three pomegranate cultivars is presented in Table. Plant height ranged between<br />
175.11 cm in Ganesh to 222.86 cm in Bhagwa. Significantly highest plant height was recorded<br />
as 222.86 cm in Bhagwa followed by 202.57 cm in Arakta. The minimum plant height was<br />
recorded as 175.11 cm in Ganesh. Significantly maximum diameter <strong>of</strong> stem 3.99 cm observed<br />
in Bhagwa followed by 3.44 cm in Arakta, whereas significantly minimum stem diameter<br />
recorded in Ganesh (3.16cm). Similar type <strong>of</strong> variation in plant height has been reported in<br />
pomegranate (Sharma and Bist, 2005). The slight variations among different studies may be<br />
attributed to the genetic makeup <strong>of</strong> cultivars, agroclimatic conditions, nutritional status <strong>of</strong> soil<br />
and cultural practices.<br />
Yield Characters<br />
Highest number <strong>of</strong> fruits plant -1 , weight <strong>of</strong> fruit and yield were recorded (38.57, 123.43 g and<br />
61.67 q ha -1 ) in cultivar Bhagwa which was statistically higher than rest <strong>of</strong> the cultivar<br />
followed by Arakta (33.43, 118.71 g and 59.36 q ha -1 ) and Ganesh (30.00, 108.86 g and 54.43<br />
q ha -1 ). Similar result reported by<br />
Growth and yield performance <strong>of</strong> different varieties <strong>of</strong> pomegranate (2017-2018)<br />
Sr.<br />
No.<br />
Name <strong>of</strong><br />
cultivar<br />
Plant<br />
height<br />
(cm)<br />
Diameter <strong>of</strong><br />
stem (cm)<br />
No. <strong>of</strong><br />
fruits<br />
plant -1<br />
Fruit<br />
weight (g)<br />
Yield<br />
(q ha -1 )<br />
1 Bhagwa 222.86 3.99 38.57 123.43 61.67<br />
2 Arakta 202.57 3.44 33.43 118.71 59.36<br />
3 Ganesh 175.11 3.16 30.00 108.86 54.43<br />
F test Sig. Sig. Sig. Sig. Sig.<br />
SE m + 2.36 0.10 0.61 0.58 0.29<br />
C.D. 5 % 7.26 0.29 1.88 1.78 0.89<br />
425 | Page Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Conclusion<br />
Growth and yield performance <strong>of</strong> different varieties <strong>of</strong> pomegranate (2017-2018)<br />
The maximum plant height, diameter <strong>of</strong> stem, number <strong>of</strong> fruit per plant, fruit weight and yield<br />
per hectare were noticed significantly in pomegranate variety viz. Bhagwa. Hence, Bhagwa<br />
variety <strong>of</strong> pomegranate found best under Achalpur condition <strong>of</strong> Amravati district <strong>of</strong><br />
Maharashtra state.<br />
References<br />
Rao, K., Dhanumjaya and Subramanyam, K., 2010. Growth and yield performance <strong>of</strong><br />
pomegranate varieties under scarce rainfall zone. Agriculture Science Digest. 30(1)71-<br />
72.<br />
Sharma, K.K. and Dillion, W.S., 2002. Evaluation <strong>of</strong> evergreen varieties <strong>of</strong> under Punjab<br />
conditions. Agriculture Science Digest. 22 (1)42-44.<br />
Sharma, N and Bist, H.S., 2005. Evaluation <strong>of</strong> some pomegranate cultivars under mid hills <strong>of</strong><br />
Himachal Pradesh. Acta Horticulture. 696: 103-105.<br />
Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance<br />
426 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
T3-42P<br />
Assessment <strong>of</strong> Genetic Diversity among the Maize (Zea mays L.) Genotypes<br />
Based on SSR Markers Linked to Drought Tolerance<br />
P. Sathish*, M. Vanaja, Y. Varalaxmi, B. Sarkar, N. Jyothi Lakshmi, S.K. Yadav, Ch.<br />
Mohan, A. Sushma and M. Prabhakar<br />
ICAR - Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, Hyderabad-500 059, India<br />
*p.sathish2@icar.gov.in<br />
Maize (Zea mays L.) is the third most important cereal crop after wheat and rice in terms <strong>of</strong><br />
global grain production. Drought is one <strong>of</strong> the most important abiotic stresses limiting crop<br />
yield by 15, 40%, and 60% at vegetative, pollination and grain filling periods respectively.<br />
Diversity among maize germplasm is important for identifying parental lines for successful<br />
breeding programme and development <strong>of</strong> hybrids with adaptation to a broad range <strong>of</strong><br />
environments. Among the different types <strong>of</strong> molecular markers, simple sequence repeats<br />
(SSRs) are one <strong>of</strong> the most promising molecular markers and quite useful in assessment <strong>of</strong><br />
genetic diversity, marker assisted selection and genetic studies such as construction <strong>of</strong> linkage<br />
maps and QTL mapping. The present study was aimed to identify diverse genotypes <strong>of</strong> maize<br />
for genetic enhancement <strong>of</strong> drought tolerance.<br />
Methodology<br />
Twelve maize genotypes were obtained from different sources viz., ICAR-IIMR, New Delhi;<br />
ICAR-NBPGR, Hyderabad; ICAR-CRIDA; Maize Research Centre, PJTSAU, Hyderabad.<br />
The crop was sown during kharif 2021 at ICAR- CRIDA, Hyderabad, to assess the genetic<br />
diversity among the genotypes. The recommended fertilizer dose and cultural practices along<br />
with plant protection measures were followed to raise the crop. Each genotype genomic DNA<br />
was extracted from young leaves at 3- to 4-week-old plants following CTAB method (Doyle<br />
and Doyle, 1990) with slight modifications. Genomic SSR markers (25) reported having<br />
association with drought tolerance traits belonging to different series viz., bnlg, umc, and phi<br />
were selected. These markers were selected based on their repeat units and bin location to<br />
provide uniform coverage <strong>of</strong> entire maize genome. The SSR amplification <strong>of</strong> gel images and<br />
marker data were processed using Biovision s<strong>of</strong>tware, USA. The molecular weight data were<br />
used to calculate the number <strong>of</strong> alleles, heterozygosity, and polymorphism information content<br />
(PIC) for each <strong>of</strong> the primer pairs using Power Marker 3.25 s<strong>of</strong>tware (Liu and Muse 2005).<br />
The binary data <strong>of</strong> SSR markers was used for cluster analysis and the dendrogram was<br />
generated based on similarity matrices obtained with the unweighted pair-group method using<br />
the arithmetic mean (UPGMA). All the data analysis was carried out using the NTSYS-pc2.0<br />
s<strong>of</strong>tware package (Rohlf, 1998).<br />
427 | Page Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Results<br />
Twelve maize genotypes were characterized using 25 drought related SSR markers, and the<br />
data revealed most <strong>of</strong> SSR markers as polymorphic. These polymorphic SSRs were used to<br />
estimate the genetic variation among the selected maize genotypes. Twenty-five SSR markers<br />
amplified a total <strong>of</strong> 124 alleles and the number <strong>of</strong> alleles ranged from 4 to 7 with a mean <strong>of</strong> 5<br />
alleles per locus. The higher (7) number <strong>of</strong> alleles were amplified by markers bnlg 1179, umc<br />
1542, bnlg 1866 and bnlg 2190 followed by 6 alleles were amplified by markers bnlg 1014,<br />
bnlg 1209 and phi014 (Fig.). The amplified products with 25 SSRs were ranged from 100 to<br />
298 bp. The highest PCR fragment (298 bp) was generated by primer umc 1596 and the lowest<br />
size fragment (100 bp) by bnlg 490. Polymorphism information content (PIC) ranged from 0.70<br />
to with 0.84 a mean <strong>of</strong> 0.75, Heterozygosity (H) ranged from 0.75 to with 0.86 a mean <strong>of</strong> 0.79.<br />
In the present study total <strong>of</strong> 124 alleles generated by using 25 SSR markers and the obtained<br />
PIC values. Based on dendrogram results 12 genotypes were separated in to 4 major clusters<br />
and cluster IV with 4 genotypes. These results clearly indicating that the selected genotypes<br />
possessed high level <strong>of</strong> genetic diversity as they showed high level <strong>of</strong> polymorphism <strong>of</strong> drought<br />
linked SSR markers.<br />
L 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 L<br />
bnlg 1014<br />
L 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 L<br />
bnlg 1179<br />
bnlg 1621<br />
bnlg 1065<br />
bnlg 2190<br />
umc1447<br />
Figure: PCR amplification pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> 12 maize genotypes generated by primers bnlg 1014, bnlg 1179, bnlg 1621,<br />
bnlg 1065, bnlg 2190, umc 1447, L- DNA Ladder (100bp), maize genotypes 1 to12 in the following order <strong>of</strong> M-22,<br />
DTL-4-1, Harsha, M-24, DHM-117, M-59, DTL-3, M-16, DTL-4, Varun, DTL-9 and DTL-11.<br />
Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance<br />
428 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Conclusion<br />
Among the selected 12 maize genotypes there is high genetic diversity was recorded as there<br />
is significant polymorphism <strong>of</strong> drought linked SSR markers was existing. This genetic resource<br />
may be useful in future quantitative trait loci (QTL) mapping for different traits and further to<br />
develop tolerant varieties for various abiotic stress conditions including drought.<br />
References<br />
Doyle, J. J. and Doyle, J. L. 1990. A rapid DNA isolation procedure from small quantity <strong>of</strong> fresh<br />
leaf material. Phytochem. Bull. 119:11-15.<br />
Liu, K. J. and Muse, S. V. 2005. Power Marker: integrated analysis environment for genetic<br />
marker data. Bioinformatics 21, 2128–2129.<br />
Rohlf, F. J. 1998. NTSYS-pc Numerical Taxonomy and Multivariate Analysis System, Version<br />
2.02i. Exeter Publications, New York.<br />
429 | Page Managing genetic resources for enhanced stress tolerance
Theme– 4<br />
Sustainable soil management for resilient<br />
rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation<br />
agriculture, organic farming, INM, soilmicroorganisms-plant<br />
interactions
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Theme – 4: Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agroecosystem:<br />
conservation agriculture, organic farming, INM, soilmicroorganisms-plant<br />
interactions<br />
List <strong>of</strong> <strong>Extended</strong> Summaries<br />
Sl.<br />
No<br />
Title First Author ID<br />
1 Long term effect <strong>of</strong> Nutrient management practices in<br />
rainfed maize in Southern Rajasthan under dryland<br />
condition<br />
2 Carbon sequestrations impact on black cotton soil under<br />
Rainfed condition <strong>of</strong> Malwa plateau.<br />
3 Bio-fertilizers mediated integrated nutrient management<br />
for sustaining the Chickpea productivity under rainfed<br />
Vertisols <strong>of</strong> south India<br />
4 Integrated organic farming systems: Sustainable<br />
approach for harnessing food-energy -carbon nexus in<br />
agricultural production systems<br />
5 Impact <strong>of</strong> long- term fertilization and manuring on<br />
aggregate stability and biochemical characterization <strong>of</strong><br />
aggregate associated C in the Alfisols<br />
6 Response <strong>of</strong> Microbial Consortia on productivity <strong>of</strong><br />
Sorghum (Sorghum bicolar L.) and soil quality under<br />
rainfed condition<br />
7 Soil moisture stress alters the abundance <strong>of</strong> maize root<br />
associated bacteria<br />
8 Long term integrated plant nutrient supply and insitu<br />
crop residues management practices on plant nutrient<br />
uptake and soil microbial population assessment in<br />
rainfed cotton under vertisols<br />
9 On-farm Assessment <strong>of</strong> Site Specific Nutrient<br />
Management in Rainfed areas <strong>of</strong> Telangana<br />
10 Integrated Nutrient Management Approach in Soybean<br />
(Glycine max L., Merrill) Grown in Vertisols Under<br />
Rainfed Condition <strong>of</strong> Malwa Plateau, Madhya Pradesh<br />
11 Vertical distribution <strong>of</strong> different pools <strong>of</strong> soil organic<br />
carbon under long term finger millet monocropping on<br />
Alfisols in semi-arid tropical India<br />
12 Conjoint Application <strong>of</strong> Nano-Urea and Conventional<br />
Fertilizers for Sustainable Crop Production<br />
RK Sharma<br />
Bharat Singh<br />
MN Ramesha<br />
Subhash Babu<br />
Suvana Sukumaran<br />
PH Gourkhede<br />
M Manjunath<br />
V Sanjivkumar<br />
Kasthuri Rajamani<br />
Bharat Singh<br />
BG Vasanthi<br />
Pravin Kumar<br />
Upadhyay<br />
T4-01O-1124<br />
T4-02O-1260<br />
T4-03O-1394<br />
T4-03aO-1636<br />
T4-04R-1217<br />
T4-05R-1032<br />
T4-06R-1055<br />
T4-07R-1066<br />
T4-08R-1099<br />
T4-09R-1437<br />
T4-10R-1484<br />
T4-10aR-1624<br />
430 | Page Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming, INM,<br />
soil-microorganisms-plant interactions
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Sl.<br />
No<br />
Title First Author ID<br />
13 Soil Organic Carbon Stock Changes in a Semi-Arid<br />
Alfisol under Heavy Carbon Loading<br />
14 Impact <strong>of</strong> fertilizer deep placement on yield and<br />
nutrient use efficiency <strong>of</strong> direct seeded rice<br />
15 Sowing dates and nutrient management practices in<br />
spring-summer black gram [Vigna mungo (L.) Hepper]<br />
for optimization <strong>of</strong> growth and production<br />
16 Effect <strong>of</strong> N fertilization on grain N content and<br />
productivity <strong>of</strong> rice and maize<br />
17 Integrated approach for zinc enrichment in rainfed<br />
maize<br />
18 Influence <strong>of</strong> Integrated Nutrient Management on Soil<br />
Properties, Crop Yields and Water Use Efficiency in<br />
Rainfed Maize-Wheat Rotation<br />
19 Effect <strong>of</strong> mulching and integrated nutrient management<br />
on growth <strong>of</strong> kharif maize under dryland condition<br />
20 Yield Maximization <strong>of</strong> Indian Mustard (Brassica<br />
juncea) through Integrated Nutrient Management under<br />
Dryland Condition<br />
21 Quality and Leaf Nutrient <strong>of</strong> Pomegranate (Punica<br />
granatum L.) Influenced by Integrated Nutrient<br />
Management<br />
22 Effect <strong>of</strong> Long-Term Fertilization on Yield and<br />
Chemical Properties <strong>of</strong> Soil in Soybean-Safflower<br />
Croping Sequence in dryland condition under Vertisol<br />
23 Effect <strong>of</strong> foliar application <strong>of</strong> DAP on yield, quality and<br />
nutrient uptake <strong>of</strong> chickpea under dryland conditions<br />
24 Effect <strong>of</strong> Sulphur Levels and FYM on Yield, Oil<br />
Content and Nutrient Uptake <strong>of</strong> Safflower under<br />
Dryland Condition<br />
25 Changes in soil fertility status after long term<br />
application <strong>of</strong> integrated nutrient management in direct<br />
seeded rice-field pea cropping system<br />
26 Response <strong>of</strong> Mung bean to higher doses <strong>of</strong> fertilizers<br />
under rainfed conditions<br />
27 Response <strong>of</strong> Soybean Varieties to Integrated Nutrient<br />
Management under Rain-fed Condition in New Alluvial<br />
K Srinivas<br />
Jami Naveen<br />
Purabi Banerjee<br />
Surajit Mondal<br />
P Nandini<br />
Mohammad Amin<br />
Bhat<br />
Sudhanshu Verma<br />
SK Sharma<br />
R Bhagyaresha<br />
R Bhagyaresha<br />
IR Bagwan<br />
Shubhangi Kadam<br />
T Chandrakar<br />
MD Giri<br />
Anusree Paul<br />
T4-11P-1027<br />
T4-12P-1035<br />
T4-13P-1058<br />
T4-14P-1060<br />
T4-15P-1064<br />
T4-16P-1628<br />
T4-17P-1085<br />
T4-18P-1089<br />
T4-19P-1093<br />
T4-20P-1094<br />
T4-21P-1098<br />
T4-22P-1100<br />
T4-23P-1114<br />
T4-24P-1130<br />
T4-25P-1143<br />
Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming,<br />
INM, soil-microorganisms-plant interactions<br />
431 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Sl.<br />
No<br />
Zone <strong>of</strong> West Bengal<br />
Title First Author ID<br />
28 Water-soluble fertilizers for foliar supplementation in<br />
rainfed areas<br />
29 Foliar nutrition: a key to integrated nutrient<br />
management in vegetable cowpea<br />
30 Impact <strong>of</strong> integrated nutrient management on wheat<br />
(Triticum aestivum L.) in Eastern Uttar Pradesh<br />
31 Effect <strong>of</strong> integrated nutrient management on growth,<br />
yield and economics <strong>of</strong> rainfed chickpea (Cicer<br />
arietinum L.)<br />
32 Effect <strong>of</strong> integrated nutrient management on the growth<br />
and yield <strong>of</strong> mustard (Brassica juncea (L.) Czernj.<br />
&Cosson) under guava (Psidium guajavaL.) based agrihorti<br />
system<br />
33 Effect Of Integrated Nutrient Management on System<br />
Yield, Sustainable Yield Index and Soil Properties In<br />
Maize-Based Cropping System<br />
34 Soil microbial dynamics as influenced by crop residue<br />
management practices in legume- cereal sequence<br />
35 Response <strong>of</strong> Sweet Corn (Zea mays L.var. saccharata<br />
sturt) to Integrated Nutrient Management Under<br />
Rainfed Condition<br />
36 Effect <strong>of</strong> sulphur levels and spacings on growth and<br />
yield <strong>of</strong> Linseed (Linum usitatissium L.) under Vertisols<br />
in rainfed situation <strong>of</strong> Marathwada region<br />
37 Growth and Yield <strong>of</strong> soybean (Glycine max (L.)<br />
Merrill) as influenced by foliar application <strong>of</strong> growth<br />
regulators, seaweed extract and potassium nitrate.<br />
38 Nutrient management for sustaining productivity <strong>of</strong><br />
sunflower-based cropping systems in vertisols <strong>of</strong> ap.<br />
39 Effect <strong>of</strong> integrated nutrient management on growth and<br />
yield <strong>of</strong> kharif Groundnut (Arachis hypogea L.)<br />
40 Soil test crop response approach for chickpea crop in<br />
Vertisol<br />
41 Studies on growth, yield and quality <strong>of</strong> sesame as<br />
influenced by chemical fertilizers and liquid<br />
bi<strong>of</strong>ertilizers<br />
SS Balloli<br />
RK Krishnasree<br />
Ambuj Kumar Singh<br />
SM Kurmvanshi<br />
Miryala Sushma<br />
Bikram Borkotoki<br />
Ammaji Pydi<br />
PN Karanjikar<br />
VB Awasarmal<br />
JD Kalambe<br />
K Prabhakar<br />
AK Ghotmukale<br />
YS Satish Kumar<br />
SG Mane<br />
T4-26P-1162<br />
T4-27P-1183<br />
T4-28P-1190<br />
T4-29P-1228<br />
T4-30P-1259<br />
T4-31P-1299<br />
T4-32P-1310<br />
T4-33P-1313<br />
T4-34P-1323<br />
T4-35P-1328<br />
T4-36P-1351<br />
T4-37P-1361<br />
T4-38P-1390<br />
T4-39P-1421<br />
432 | Page Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming, INM,<br />
soil-microorganisms-plant interactions
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Sl.<br />
No<br />
Title First Author ID<br />
42 Response <strong>of</strong> little millet to different spacings and<br />
fertilizer levels<br />
43 Effect <strong>of</strong> Polymulching on Dalley Chilli in Eastern<br />
Himalayan Region <strong>of</strong> West Bengal<br />
44 A Study on Resilience Of Soil Health Through Fertigation<br />
And Nutrient Management In Tomato<br />
45 Phenological and quality response <strong>of</strong> gram (Cicer<br />
arietinum L.) to foliage applied fertilizers<br />
46 Assessment <strong>of</strong> bio-fertilizers and phosphorus levels on<br />
productivity and pr<strong>of</strong>itability <strong>of</strong> green gram (Vigna<br />
radiata L.)<br />
47 Effect <strong>of</strong> Long-Term Fertilizer Application on crop<br />
productivity <strong>of</strong> Wheat<br />
48 Studies on effect <strong>of</strong> NPK, Bulb size and Spacing on<br />
Yield <strong>of</strong> Pran (Top Onion) under temperate rainfed<br />
conditions<br />
49 Stress Management in Wheat Crop Through Foliar<br />
Spray <strong>of</strong> TGA Agro-chemical<br />
50 Biochar: An effective soil amendment to reduce<br />
emissions and increase crop productivity<br />
51 Temporal Changes in Soil Properties Under Intensive<br />
Cotton Growing Vertisols<br />
52 Effect <strong>of</strong> different levels <strong>of</strong> nitrogen, phosphorus and potash<br />
on yield, yield attributes and economic <strong>of</strong> Bt. cotton under<br />
rainfed conditions<br />
53 Effect <strong>of</strong> long term INM on SOC stock, yield<br />
sustainability and its relationship with soil quality<br />
attributes under cotton + greengram (1:1) intercropping<br />
system in Vertisols<br />
SJR Syed<br />
PranabBarma<br />
Minnu John<br />
Sharad<br />
ShikandarJadhav<br />
Manoj Kumar<br />
Jyoti Bangre<br />
Tahir Saleem<br />
RS Rathore<br />
Nitin M Kumbhar<br />
SB Girdekar<br />
PD Vekariya<br />
VV Gabhane<br />
T4-40P-1455<br />
T4-41P-1480<br />
T4-42P-1506<br />
T4-43P-1524<br />
T4-44P-1548<br />
T4-45P-1563<br />
T4-46P-1618<br />
T4-47P<br />
T4-48P<br />
T4-49P<br />
T4-50P<br />
T4-51P<br />
Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming,<br />
INM, soil-microorganisms-plant interactions<br />
433 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
T4-01O-1124<br />
Long-Term Effect <strong>of</strong> Nutrient Management Practices in Rainfed Maize in<br />
Southern Rajasthan under Dryland Condition<br />
R. K. Sharma 1* , J. K. Balyan 2 , G. R. Chary 4 , Ramavtar 1 , S. Dadheech 1 and S. K. Sharma 3<br />
1 College <strong>of</strong> Agriculture Bhilwara–311001, Rajasthan<br />
2 Dryland Farming Research Station, Arjia, Bhilwara<br />
3 Directorate <strong>of</strong> Research, Udaipur4ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
*rksdfrs@ yahoo.co.in<br />
Rainfed agriculture is the main stay <strong>of</strong> farmers in Rajasthan. Out <strong>of</strong> 10.23 lakh ha <strong>of</strong> gross<br />
cropped area in Sub-Humid Plain and Southern Hills <strong>of</strong> South Rajasthan, 77% area is rainfed.<br />
The zone is characterized by small and scattered land holdings, erratic distribution <strong>of</strong> rainfall,<br />
inherently poor soil fertility and frequent crop failures due to drought. Integrated nutrient<br />
management envisages the use <strong>of</strong> fertilizers in conjunction with locally available nutrient<br />
sources <strong>of</strong> organic-based manures (FYM, compost, green leaf manure etc.), legume in<br />
cropping system for sustaining soil health and productivity. The soils are low in nitrogen.<br />
Therefore, instead <strong>of</strong> solely depending on costly chemical fertilizer, some low-cost practices<br />
should be adopted to explore the possibility <strong>of</strong> getting the natural sources <strong>of</strong> nitrogen<br />
available to the farmers.<br />
Methodology<br />
Field experiments were conducted in All Indian Coordinated Research Project on Dryland<br />
Agriculture, Dryland Farming Research Station (MPUAT) Arjia, Rajasthan during kharif<br />
2008-2020 under dryland conditions. The experimental site is typically representative <strong>of</strong> the<br />
dryland conditions <strong>of</strong> western India and having Sandy loam soil texture. The experiment was<br />
laid out in a randomized block design with four replications and nine treatments in a set. The<br />
treatments consisted <strong>of</strong> T 1- Control (No fertilizer), T 2-100% RDN & P (50 kg N+30 kg P 2O 5<br />
ha-1) through inorganic fertilizer,T3- 25 kg N through FYM and remaining 25 kg N through<br />
IF +30 kg P 2O 5 ha-1, T 4-25 Kg N through compost and remaining 25 kg N through IF+30 kg<br />
P2O5 ha-1, T5-25 kg N through crop residues (wheat straw) and remaining 25 kg N through<br />
IF+30 kg P2O5 ha-1, T6- 15 kg N through FYM + 10 kg N through crop residues and<br />
remaining 25 kg N through IF+30 kg P 2O 5 ha-1, T 7- 15 kg N through FYM + 10 kg N<br />
through compost and remaining 25 kg N through IF+30 kg P2O5 ha-1, T8- 15 kg N through<br />
FYM + 10 kg N through Greenleafand remaining 25 kg N through IF+30 kg P 2O 5 ha-1 and<br />
T 9- 100% RDN through IF without phosphorus and applied in maize crop. The treatments<br />
were superimposed with 4 replications in a Randomized Block Design with plot size <strong>of</strong> 6 m ×<br />
5 m. Maize crop was sown at a row-plant spacing <strong>of</strong> 60 × 25 cm and blackgram crop was<br />
sown at a row- plant spacing <strong>of</strong> 30 x 10 cm. The recommended dose <strong>of</strong> P fertilizers was<br />
434 | Page Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming, INM,<br />
soil-microorganisms-plant interactions
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
applied in all treatments except T 1: Control. The 100% RDF comprised <strong>of</strong> 50 kg ha−1 <strong>of</strong> N<br />
and 30 kg ha−1 <strong>of</strong> P 2O5. Well decomposed FYM, compost and crop residues were<br />
incorporated according to treatments 2 weeks before the sowing <strong>of</strong> maize crop in rainy<br />
season.<br />
Results<br />
Results revealed that application <strong>of</strong> 25 kg N through FYM and 25 kg N through IF+ 30 kg<br />
P 2O 5 ha-1 recorded higher mean maize grain equivalent yield (3533 kg ha-1) and higher<br />
maize equivalent stover yield (5390 kg ha-1) as compared to control (2057 kg ha-1and 2967<br />
kg ha-1, respectively).The available nitrogen content <strong>of</strong> the soil was affected by application<br />
<strong>of</strong> organic manure and chemical fertilizers. It varied from 185 kg ha-1 (control) to 265.05<br />
kgha-1 in the treatment receiving 25 kg N through FYM and 25kg N through chemical<br />
fertilizer along with 30 kg P 2O 5 ha-1. Similarly, organic carbon content, available<br />
phosphorous and available potassium significantly increased by the application <strong>of</strong> organic<br />
manure, chemical fertilizers and their combinations in comparison to control. Micronutrient<br />
status were also found higher with the application <strong>of</strong> organic sources. Whereas, pH and<br />
electric conductivity did not influence statistically significant by the application <strong>of</strong> organic<br />
sources. However, bulk density and infiltration rate significantly influenced by the<br />
application <strong>of</strong> different organic sources. Results revealed that applications <strong>of</strong> organic<br />
treatments significantly affected the population <strong>of</strong> bacteria, fungi and actinomycetes in soil<br />
and recorded higher with the application <strong>of</strong> 25 kg N through FYM and 25 kg N through<br />
IF+30 kg P2O5 ha-1. Dehydrogenase activities also observed significantly higher in organic<br />
treatments. Research findings suggested that judicious combination <strong>of</strong> manures and chemical<br />
fertilizers depending upon the availability, nature and properties <strong>of</strong> the soil and crops not only<br />
enhanced the cereal crops’ productivity, but also maintained the soil fertility (Sharma et<br />
al.2018), soil quality and optimum productivity on sustainable basis (Singh and Yadav 1992).<br />
Conservation and maintenance <strong>of</strong> a threshold level <strong>of</strong> SOM is a key consideration in<br />
sustainable crop productivity and maintenance <strong>of</strong> soil quality. Many studies have shown that<br />
balanced application <strong>of</strong> chemical fertilizers and organic manures can increase soil<br />
productivity and positively related to soil C accumulation (Srinivasarao et al. 2016).<br />
Application <strong>of</strong> organic manures can increase the SOM and enhance soil fertility (Debska et<br />
al. 2016).<br />
Conclusion<br />
Application <strong>of</strong> 25 kg N through FYM and 25 kg N through IF+ 30 kg P 2O 5 recorded 70.35 %<br />
higher mean maize grain equivalent yield and 76.2% higher maize equivalent stover yield as<br />
compared to control after fourteen years <strong>of</strong> experimentation.<br />
Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming,<br />
INM, soil-microorganisms-plant interactions<br />
435 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
References<br />
Dębska, B., Dlugosz, J., Piotrowska-Dlugosz, A., Banach-Szott, M. 2016. The impact <strong>of</strong> a<br />
bio-fertilizer on the soil organic matter status and carbon sequestration—results from a<br />
field-scale study. J Soil Sediment.16:2335–2343.<br />
Sharma, K. L., Srinivasarao, Ch., Suma Chandrika, D., Lal, M., Indoria, A. K., Sammi<br />
Reddy, K., Ravindra Chary, G., Amrutsagar, V., Kathmale, D. K., More, N. B.,<br />
Srinivas, K., Gopinath, K. A., Kalyana Srinivas, D. 2018. Effect <strong>of</strong> predominant<br />
integrated nutrient management practices on soil quality indicators and soil quality<br />
indices under post monsoon (rabi) sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) in rainfed black soils<br />
(Vertisols) <strong>of</strong> western India. Commun. Soil Sci Plant Anal. 49:1629–1637.<br />
Singh, G. B., Yadav, D. V. 1992. Integrated nutrient supply system in sugarcane and<br />
sugarcane-based cropping system. Fertil News. 37:15–22.<br />
Srinivasarao, Ch., Gopinath, K. A., Prasad, J. V. N. S., Prasannakumar, A. K., Singh. 2016.<br />
Climate resilient villages for sustainable food security in tropical India: concept,<br />
process, technologies, institutions and impacts. Adv Agron. 140:101–214.<br />
T4-02O-1260<br />
Carbon Sequestrations Impact on Black Cotton Soil under Rainfed<br />
Condition <strong>of</strong> Malwa Plateau<br />
Bharat Singh* and S.K. Sharma<br />
* singhbharat05@gmail.com<br />
The soil organic carbon is the very foundation for healthy and productive soils. The soil<br />
organic matter positively influences and modifies almost all the soil properties. Considering<br />
the role <strong>of</strong> soil organic matter in maintaining soil health, the agricultural practices that<br />
enhance the soil organic carbon are essential. Addition <strong>of</strong> organic matter through green<br />
manures plays an important role in improving productivity <strong>of</strong> crop besides improvement in<br />
soil physico-chemical properties, which <strong>of</strong>ten deteriorate under intensive cropping involving<br />
inorganic fertilization (Hiremath and Patel, 1996). The present investigation was conducted<br />
to know the effect <strong>of</strong> various treatments <strong>of</strong> soybean, maize and sunhemp (as green manure)<br />
on carbon sequestration impact in vertisols.<br />
Methodology<br />
A field experiment was conducted during the kharif season <strong>of</strong> 2017-18 atCollege <strong>of</strong><br />
Agriculture, Indore, India. The experiment was carried out with 8 treatments and replicated<br />
thrice in a randomized block design (RBD). The treatments includedsoybean + sunhemp (2:1)<br />
436 | Page Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming, INM,<br />
soil-microorganisms-plant interactions
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
at 30 cm; soybean + sunhemp (1:1) at 45 cm; sole soybean at 45 cm; maize + sunhemp (2:1)<br />
at 45 cm; maize + sunhemp (1:1) at 30 cm; sole maize at 60 cm; soybean + maize (1:1) at 45<br />
cm; sole sunhemp at 30 cm. The green manuring crop sunhemp, soybean (cv. JS 95- 60) and<br />
maize (cv. K 604 Hybrid) were sown in the last week <strong>of</strong> June. The soybean and maize were<br />
grown with 20:60:40 and 120:60:40 kg ha -1 recommended dose <strong>of</strong> N: P2O5:K2O,<br />
respectively. The sunhemp was incorporated in the first week <strong>of</strong> August.<br />
Results<br />
In 0- 15 cm soil depth, highest soil moisture content was observed in the treatment sole<br />
sunhemp at 30 cm followed by treatment Soybean + sunhemp (1:1) at 45 cm. The sole<br />
sunhemp cropping registered 35-40% and 33-37% higher soil moisture in 0-15 and 15-30 cm<br />
soil depth, respectively as compared to sole soybean and maize crop. The intercropping also<br />
showed 20-26% higher soil moisture in different depths as compared to sole cropping. The<br />
soil bulk density was found lowest in the treatment <strong>of</strong> sole sunhemp at 30 cm significantly<br />
reduced over the other treatments. The soil porosity analyzed after harvest <strong>of</strong> the crops<br />
ranged between 47.4% in treatment <strong>of</strong> sole Maize at 60 cm and 51.3% in treatment <strong>of</strong> sole<br />
sunhemp at 30 cm. The soil porosity remained unaffected irrespective either intercropping<br />
and/or green manuring. The treatments soybean + sunhemp (2:1) at 30 cm, Soybean +<br />
sunhemp (1:1) at 45 cmand sole sunhemp at 30 cm were found to be statistically at par with<br />
respect to the MWD but significantly superior over the other treatments under study. The<br />
increase in MWD <strong>of</strong> soil mainly attributed to the increase in soil organic carbon content<br />
(Tiarkset al., 1974).<br />
The soil pH remained unaffected irrespective either intercropping and/or green manuring.<br />
The treatment sole sunhemp at 30 cm, soybean + sunhemp (1:1) at 45 cm, Soybean +<br />
sunhemp (2:1) at 30 cm, maize + sunhemp (2:1) at 45 cm and maize + sunhemp (1:1) at 30<br />
cm recorded significantly higher soil organic carbon as compared to the other treatments. The<br />
highest bacterial population was observed under the treatment sole sunhemp at 30 cm,<br />
whereas, the lowest was observed under sole maize cultivation at 60 cm row to row spacing.<br />
The highest fungal and actinomycetes population was found under sole green manure<br />
cropping i.e. treatment sole sunhemp at 30 cm, whereas the lowest was observed under<br />
Soybean + Maize (1:1) at 45 cm and sole soybean at 45 cm, respectively.<br />
The enhanced microbial population upon application <strong>of</strong> different sources <strong>of</strong> organic matter is<br />
in close agreement with present results (Aheret al., 2018). The incorporation <strong>of</strong> sunhemp as<br />
green manure crop intercropped with soybean and maize showed positive response on<br />
physico-chemical and microbial properties <strong>of</strong> soil.<br />
Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming,<br />
INM, soil-microorganisms-plant interactions<br />
437 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Conclusion<br />
The green manure intercrop treatments significantly enhanced soil organic carbon and<br />
improved physical, chemical and biological properties <strong>of</strong> soil and reflected as viable<br />
technique in improving soil health.<br />
References<br />
Aher, S. B., Lakaria, B. L., Swami K., Singh, A. B., Ramana, S., Thakur, J. K., Biswas, A.<br />
K., Jha, P., Manna, M. C. and Yashona, D. S. 2018. Soil microbial population and<br />
enzyme activities under organic, biodynamic and conventional agriculture in semi-arid<br />
tropical conditions <strong>of</strong> central India. J. Exp. Biol. Agric. Sci., 6(5): 763-773.<br />
Hiremath, S. M. and Patel, Z. G. 1996. Biomass production, N-accumulation and nodulation<br />
<strong>of</strong> green manure species during winter season. J. Maharashtra Agric. Univ. 21: 55-57.<br />
Tiarks, A. E., Mazurak, A. P. and Chesnin, L. 1974. Physical and chemical properties <strong>of</strong> soil<br />
associated with heavy applications <strong>of</strong> manure from cattle feedlots. Soil Sci. Soc. Am.<br />
Proc.,38: 826-830.<br />
T4-03O-1394<br />
Bio-Fertilizers Mediated Integrated Nutrient Management for<br />
Sustaining the Chickpea Productivity Under Rainfed Vertisols <strong>of</strong><br />
SouthIndia<br />
M.N. Ramesha 1* , S.L. Patil 2 , K.N. Ravi 1 and M. Prabhavathi 1<br />
1 ICAR-Indian Institute <strong>of</strong> Soil &Water Conservation, Research Centre, Ballari, Karnataka 583 104, India<br />
2 ICAR- Indian Institute Pulse Research, Regional Research Centre, Dharwad, 580 005, India<br />
* MN.Ramesha@icar.gov.in<br />
Increasing demand for nutritionally fortified quality foods and challenges <strong>of</strong> soil fertility<br />
maintenance is a big concern for future sustainable food production with respect to source<br />
<strong>of</strong> fertilizer input used and energy required for their production. The resources available<br />
with the farming community and their socio-economic aspects warrant the adoption <strong>of</strong><br />
alternative strategies for enhancing the use efficiency <strong>of</strong> inputs and environmental safety.<br />
The microbe’s adaptability and ability to thrive in different environments, low cost <strong>of</strong> their<br />
production and environmental safety aspects, has prompted introduction <strong>of</strong> microbial<br />
intervention in the crop production (Sarkar et al., 2021). Literature envisages that the use<br />
<strong>of</strong> low-cost technologies i.e. N fixing, P solubilizing microbial consortium and supply <strong>of</strong><br />
deficient micronutrients (Zn and Fe) will enhance the productivity and pr<strong>of</strong>itability <strong>of</strong><br />
pulses (Nosheenet al., 2021; Rafiqueet al., 2021). In India the pulse production has<br />
438 | Page Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming, INM,<br />
soil-microorganisms-plant interactions
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
gradually increased to 25.58 MT in 2020-21however, countryhas a target <strong>of</strong> achieving 32<br />
and 39 MT by 2030 and 2050, respectively. Therefore, the productivity <strong>of</strong> pulse crops has<br />
to increase for meeting the growing demand. Among the pulse crops, chickpea is the<br />
important crop with 49% <strong>of</strong> total pulses productionin the country (Gaur, 2021). Lower<br />
productivity <strong>of</strong> pulsesis attributed to the use <strong>of</strong> traditional cultivars, cultivation on<br />
marginal lands without proper nutrient management, irrigation and disease and pest<br />
control at right time. Further, reduction in the use <strong>of</strong> organic amendments and<br />
deficiencies <strong>of</strong> micronutrients especially zinc and iron hindering pulse productivity<br />
(Patil et al., 2018). Hence, anexperiment was conducted at Research Farm, ICAR-IISWC,<br />
Bellari, to know the effect <strong>of</strong> bio-fertilizers mediated integrated nutrient management on<br />
chickpea productivity under rainfed Vertisols <strong>of</strong> south India.<br />
Methodology<br />
Treatments covers two main fertilizer application practices, viz., farmer’s practice (10:25,<br />
N:P and 2.5 tons FYM once in three years) as T 1 and recommended rate <strong>of</strong> fertilizer<br />
application (25:50 N:P and 5 tons FYM once in three years) as T2. These two treatments<br />
were supplemented with bio-fertilizers viz., Rhizobium culture, phosphate solubilizing<br />
bacteria (PSB), plant growth promoting Rhizobacteria (PGPR) to constitute T 3 and T 6<br />
treatments. Further, micronutrient zinc supplied with fertilizer application constitutes the<br />
T 4 and T 7. Combined effects <strong>of</strong>bio-fertilizers and a micronutrient with main fertilizer<br />
application practices were tested in T 5 and T 8treatments, respectively. Finally, to test the<br />
effect <strong>of</strong> foliar application, T2 was supplemented with foliar application <strong>of</strong> NPK (19:19:19<br />
one kg ha -1 ) and NK (KNO 3, one kg ha -1 ) at 5 g L -1 30 days after sowing, as treatments T 9<br />
and T10, respectively. During 2021, total rainfall received was 74% higher (897 mm) than<br />
the mean annual rainfall <strong>of</strong> the location. The crop was sown during October 2021 with<br />
receipt <strong>of</strong> 55.5 mm <strong>of</strong> rainfall prior to sowing. Crop season rainfall was 270 mm, which<br />
was 88% higher than the normal rabi season average rainfall <strong>of</strong> 65 years. The crop<br />
growth wasbelow normal during 2021-22 due to excess rain (217.5 mm) in November<br />
2021.<br />
Results<br />
The treatment T 8 with application <strong>of</strong> recommended rate <strong>of</strong> fertilizer, bi<strong>of</strong>ertilizers and zinc,<br />
produced significantly higher grain yield (973 kg ha -1 ), straw yield (1297 kg ha -1 ), total dry<br />
matter production (2269 kg ha -1 ) and water use efficiency (WUE) <strong>of</strong> 3.48 kg ha -1 mm -1<br />
over T 2, T 3 and T 1. Among the treatments having farmer's rate <strong>of</strong> fertilizer the treatment T 5<br />
with bi<strong>of</strong>ertilizers and zinc application produced higher grain yield (848 kg ha -1 ), straw<br />
yield (1130 kg ha -1 ), total dry matter production (1978 kg ha -1 ) and water use efficiency<br />
(WUE) <strong>of</strong> 3.03 kg ha -1 mm -1 over T 1. The grain yield, straw yield, total dry matter<br />
Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming,<br />
INM, soil-microorganisms-plant interactions<br />
439 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
production and WUE was higher in T 8 by 50%, 53%, 52% and 50% compared to T 1. Greater<br />
yields in T8 and T6 compared to other treatments are attributed to better crop growth with<br />
higher root length, nodules per plant and weight <strong>of</strong> nodules and greater dry matter<br />
translocation to yield components during adverse rainfall situation and effect <strong>of</strong> bi<strong>of</strong>ertilizer,<br />
zinc withrecommended rate <strong>of</strong> chemical fertilizer. The cost <strong>of</strong> cultivation<br />
remains high in the treatments that have recommended rate <strong>of</strong> fertilizer application.<br />
Significantly higher gross return(15%) was in T8with only 0.6% higher net return than the<br />
T 5. The B:C ratio was higher in T 5 (1.28) followed by T 8 and T 4 (1.24). Higher net returns<br />
<strong>of</strong> ₹ 8,046 and ₹ 8,314 ha -1 was recorded in T 3 and T 4, respectively as compared to lower<br />
net returns <strong>of</strong> ₹ 3,659 ha -1 recorded in T2indicates significance <strong>of</strong> bio-fertilizers and<br />
micronutrient in reducing the cost <strong>of</strong> cultivation and improving overall farm enterprise<br />
income. Total energy output (37279 MJ ha -1 ) and net energy benefit (32006 MJ ha -1 ) were<br />
significantly higher in T 8and was attributed to greater grain and straw yields produced in<br />
T 8. Energy use efficiency (7.07) and energy productivity (0.189 MJ ha -1 ) were significantly<br />
higher in T5. It indicates that the effect <strong>of</strong> low-cost technologies like bio-fertilizers and<br />
micronutrient supplements significantly improves the crop performance in terms <strong>of</strong> energy<br />
usage.<br />
Conclusion<br />
We can conclude that the treatment T 8with recommended rate <strong>of</strong> fertilizer<br />
applicationwith bio-fertilizers and a micronutrient sustains Chickpea productivity by<br />
producing higher grain yield, straw yield, total dry matter production, WUE, energy use<br />
efficiency, net returns and B:C ratio under above normal rainfall situations on the<br />
Vertisols <strong>of</strong> Bellariregion in southern India.<br />
Technical staff associated with the experiment Mr. B.N. Seshadri, Mr. G. Bhati and A.<br />
Kumar are appreciated for research plots maintenance and data generation.<br />
References<br />
Gaur, P. 2021. Can India sustain high growth <strong>of</strong> pulses production? J. Food Leg. 34(1): 1-3.<br />
Nosheen, S.; Ajmal, I.; Song, Y. 2021. Microbes as Bi<strong>of</strong>ertilizers, a Potential Approach for<br />
Sustainable Crop Production. Sustainability. 13: 1868. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13041868<br />
Patil, S. L., Loganandhan, N., Ramesha, M.N., Adhikary. P.P. and K. Channabasappa.<br />
2018. Energy Consumption and Sensitivity Analysis <strong>of</strong> Rainfed Chickpea Production<br />
in Vertisols<strong>of</strong> Semi-arid Karnataka. Proc. National Acad. Sci. India, Sec. B<br />
Bio.Sci.88(2):685-694.<br />
440 | Page Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming, INM,<br />
soil-microorganisms-plant interactions
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Rafique, M., Naveed, M., Mustafa, A., Akhtar, S., Munawar, M., Kaukab, S., Ali, R.M.,<br />
Siddiqui, M.H. and Salem, M.Z.M. 2021. The combined effects <strong>of</strong>gibberellic acid and<br />
rhizobium on growth, yield & nutritional status in chickpea. Agronomy11(1):<br />
105;https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomyl1010105.<br />
Sarkar, D., Rakshit, A., Al-Turki, A.I., Sayyed, R.Z., Datta, R. 2021. Connecting biopriming<br />
approach with integrated nutrient management for improved nutrient use<br />
efficiency in crop species. Agriculture 11: 372.<br />
https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture11040372.<br />
T4-03aO-1636<br />
Integrated organic farming systems: Sustainable approach for harnessing<br />
food-energy -carbon nexus in agricultural production systems<br />
Subhash Babu 1 *, Anup Das 2 , V.K. Singh 3 , Jyoti D. Gaikwad 4 , S.S. Rathore 1 ,<br />
P.K. Upadhayay 1 , R.K. Singh 1 and Raj Singh<br />
1<br />
Division <strong>of</strong> Agronomy, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, India<br />
2<br />
ICAR Research Complex for NEH Region, Tripura Centre, Tripura, India<br />
3<br />
ICAR-Central Research Institute on Dryland Agriculture, Hyderabad, India<br />
4<br />
Department <strong>of</strong> Agronomy, NAU, Navsari, Gujrat, India<br />
* subhiari@gmail.com<br />
Globally the agricultural production system is challenged by the climate change adversities,<br />
resource depletion, land degradation, low energy productivity and high Carbon foot print.<br />
The farming sector is highly sensitive to climatic uncertainties and is also highly impacted by<br />
population growth, resource scarcity, and environmental degradation (Babu et al.,2021).<br />
COP27 emphasized on development <strong>of</strong> sustainable agriculture food systems that can reduce<br />
its environmental footprint and resilient to climate vulnerabilities. Attaining a balance in the<br />
food-energy trade-<strong>of</strong>f while conserving the natural resources base and minimizing<br />
greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions for attaining sustainable development goals is one <strong>of</strong> the<br />
major challenges for the resource-poor farmers in India. Bridging the food-energy demand<br />
and supply gap while preserving the ecosystem sustainability and food security is one <strong>of</strong> the<br />
pressing challenges for researchers, and policymakers. Integration <strong>of</strong> the different farm<br />
enterprises like crops, livestock, etc. plays a synergistic role in food production, growers'<br />
livelihood, and provisioning <strong>of</strong> different ecosystem services (Martínez et al. 2007; Lu et al.<br />
2019; Lal, 2020). Thus, edifice up the inextricable soil-water-food and energy nexus for a<br />
strong agricultural production system should play a vital role in bringing in a balance<br />
between higher productivity and ecosystem sustainability. Therefore, it was hypothesized that<br />
Integrated organic farming system shall reduce farmland waste, and minimize the land<br />
degradation while sustaining higher productivity, and pr<strong>of</strong>itability.<br />
Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming,<br />
INM, soil-microorganisms-plant interactions<br />
441 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Methodology<br />
The productivity, pr<strong>of</strong>itability, energy security, and environmental sustainability <strong>of</strong> four<br />
Integrated Organic Farming System models (viz., IOFS -I, mono-cropping+livestock; IOFS -<br />
II, diversified cropping+livestock; IOFS -III, diversified cropping+livestock+poultry, and<br />
IOFS -IV, diversified cropping+ livestock+ poultry+ piggery) were assessed in Meghalaya<br />
region <strong>of</strong> Indian Himalayas. The system productivity <strong>of</strong> different systems was evaluated to<br />
assess their production capacity. For a meaningful comparison <strong>of</strong> different production<br />
systems, all products were converted into the rice equivalent yield i.e. system productivity.<br />
Energy auditing explores an efficiency edge between an input-output relationship in different<br />
production systems. Carbon footprint both at a spatial scale and yield scale and eco-efficiency<br />
considering energy input and emission <strong>of</strong> GHG per unit <strong>of</strong> economic gain were assessed to<br />
compare the environmental competency <strong>of</strong> integrated production systems. General Linear<br />
Model version SAS 9.4 was used to test the statistical significance <strong>of</strong> data obtained from<br />
diverse production systems. The least significant difference (LSD) and standard error <strong>of</strong> the<br />
mean was employed for valid comparison <strong>of</strong> data among the different IOFS models.<br />
Results<br />
All the integrated organic farming systems had higher energy pr<strong>of</strong>itability and substantially<br />
reduced greenhouse gas intensity (GHGI) over IOFS-I. IOFS -IV recorded considerably<br />
higher net pr<strong>of</strong>it (US$. 2828.5 y -1 ), energy productivity (0.22 kg MJ -1 ), and the lowest GHGI<br />
(0.33 kg CO 2eq kg -1 food production) over other production systems. GHG (kg -1 production)<br />
emissions <strong>of</strong> IOFS-IV were also 1.7 times lower than that <strong>of</strong> IOFS -I. Furthermore, IOFS -IV<br />
had recycled 81.1, 68.2, and 68.8% higher N, P, and K over the IOFS-1, respectively. Thus,<br />
the study suggested that IOFS -IV could be a pr<strong>of</strong>itable, energy-efficient, environmentally<br />
friendly, and economically viable sustainable production system for the Indian Himalayan<br />
region.<br />
References<br />
Babu Subhash, Mohapatra, K.P., Das, A., Yadav, G.S., Singh, R., Chandra, P., Avasthe, R. K., Kumar<br />
Amit, Thoithoi Devi, M., Singh, V. K. and Panwar, A. S. 2021. Integrated Farming Systems:<br />
Climate-Resilient Sustainable Food Production System in the Indian Himalayan Region. In:<br />
Exploring Synergies and Trade-<strong>of</strong>fs Between Climate Change and the Sustainable Development<br />
Goals, V. Venkatramanan, Shachi Shah and Ram Prasad (Eds.): 119-143.<br />
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-7301-9_6<br />
Lal, R. 2009. Soil degradation as a reason for inadequate human nutrition. Food Secur. 1(1): 45-57.<br />
DOI:10.1007/s12571-009-0009-z.<br />
Lu, S., Bai, X., Li, W., Wang, N. 2019. Impacts <strong>of</strong> climate change on water resources and grain<br />
production. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change. 143:76-84. DOI:10.1016/j.techfore.2019.01.015<br />
442 | Page Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming, INM,<br />
soil-microorganisms-plant interactions
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Martínez M.L., Intralawan A., Vázquez G., Pérez-Maqueo O., Sutton P., Landgrave R. 2007. The<br />
coasts <strong>of</strong> our world: Ecological, economic and social importance. Ecol. Econ. 63(2-3): 254-<br />
272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.10.022.<br />
T4-04R-1217<br />
Impact <strong>of</strong> Long- Term Fertilization and Manuring on Aggregate Stability<br />
and Biochemical Characterization <strong>of</strong> Aggregate Associated C in the Alfisols<br />
Suvana Sukumaran 1* , T. J. Purakayastha 2 , Bidisha Chakrabarti 2 ,<br />
K. K. Bandyopadhyay 2 , ThulasiViswanathe 3 , K. K. Rout 4 , K. Sammi Reddy 1 and<br />
A.K. Indoria 1<br />
1 ICAR-Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, Hyderabad, India,<br />
2 ICAR- Indian Agricultural research Institute, New Delhi,<br />
3 Regional Agricultural Research Station, Pattambi, Kerala,<br />
4 Orissa University <strong>of</strong> Agriculture and Technology, Bhubaneswar, Odisha<br />
* suvana.sukumaran@icar.gov.in<br />
Different land use and land cover management practices affect soil aggregation, which inturn<br />
affect soil C retention. The SOC in the pr<strong>of</strong>ile can be stabilised by three mechanisms mainly-<br />
physical protection by organo-mineral complexes, biochemical stability to decomposition and<br />
chemical protection by adsorption to clay surfaces. The decomposition rate <strong>of</strong> C is directly<br />
proportional to the size <strong>of</strong> aggregates. Chemical association <strong>of</strong> SOC with silt and clay<br />
particles can also impose a limit to the soil’s C stabilization potential due to a limit in the<br />
surface area <strong>of</strong> the silt-plus-clay fraction in a given soil. Biochemical stabilization <strong>of</strong> SOM in<br />
the soil matrix is a strong function <strong>of</strong> the inherent chemical and structural stability <strong>of</strong> the<br />
organic biomolecules. Soil aggregate dynamics and SOM decomposition are closely linked.<br />
The present study was undertaken to study the effect <strong>of</strong> long-term manuring and fertilization<br />
on the physical and biochemical stability <strong>of</strong> aggregates and the associated carbon in the ricerice<br />
cropping system <strong>of</strong> the Alfisols <strong>of</strong> Bhubaneswar (BHNS) and Pattambi (PTMB).<br />
Methodology<br />
This study was carried out in two long term fertilizer experiments continuing in Bhubaneswar<br />
(Orissa) and Pattambi (Kerala), where rice- rice was the main cropping system. The<br />
experimental site at Bhubaneswar has tropical and sub-humid climate, whereas that at<br />
Pattambi has perhumid. The soils at Bhubaneswar were acidic sandy loam and at Pattambi<br />
were acidic sandy clay loam. The following treatments were considered for the study:T1-<br />
control, T2- 50 % NPK, T3- 100%NPK, T4- 150 % NPK, T5- 100%NPK+ FYM ( 10 t ha -1 ),<br />
T6- 100%NPK + Lime. The soil samples were collected from 0-15 and 15-30 cm depth. The<br />
aggregate size distribution was done using wet sieving method. The total carbon content in<br />
the sample was determined by dry combustion in CHNS analyser (Eurovector, model Euro<br />
Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming,<br />
INM, soil-microorganisms-plant interactions<br />
443 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
EA3000). The glomalin content <strong>of</strong> aggregate samples were extracted using 50 mM sodium<br />
tricitrate, pH 8.0, 121OC for 1 hr (Wright and Upadhyay, 1999). The total polysaccharides<br />
were analyzed by phenol sulphuric acid method by Lowe (1994). The total carbohydrate was<br />
analyzed by phenol sulphuric acid methodby Dubois et al, (1956). Total polyphenols <strong>of</strong> POM<br />
fractions were determined by Prussian Blue spectrophotometric method.<br />
Results<br />
The effect <strong>of</strong> different treatments on mean weight diameter (MWD), geometric mean<br />
diameter (GMD) and water stable macro-aggregates (WSMA) in the rice-rice cropping<br />
system <strong>of</strong> BHNS and PTMBare given in the table. The study showed that the C associated<br />
with 2.00-0.25mm aggregates varied from 3.53 g kg -1 in 50 % NPK to 10.11 g kg -1 in plots<br />
treated with 100% NPK+FYM in soils <strong>of</strong> BHNS and from 11.7 g kg -1 in control to 23.1 g kg<br />
-1<br />
in plots treated with 100%NPK+FYM in that <strong>of</strong> PTMB. In the 0.25-0.053 mm fraction,<br />
inBHNS,100% NPK+FYM (11.1 g kg -1 ) had higher C content, whereas in the effect <strong>of</strong><br />
different treatments on biochemical stability <strong>of</strong> aggregates showed that addition <strong>of</strong> 100%<br />
NPK+FYM increased glomalin content (3.43 mg g -1 ) significantly in macro aggregates and<br />
also in micro-aggregates (3.25 mg g -1 ) in BNHS. Similar trend was observed in both the<br />
macro and micro-aggregates <strong>of</strong> PTMB. The combined application <strong>of</strong> FYM with 100% NPK<br />
significantly increased polysaccharide content in macro-aggregates (i.e. 6.09 g kg -1 ) and<br />
micro-aggregates (5.6 times compared to control) indicating that addition <strong>of</strong> FYM increases<br />
biochemical stability <strong>of</strong> aggregates at BHNS. However, in the soils <strong>of</strong> PTMB, the application<br />
<strong>of</strong> 150% NPK increased polysaccharide content in the macro-aggregate fractions and the<br />
combined application <strong>of</strong> FYM with 100% NPK (i.e. 12.8 g kg -1 ) in micro-aggregates<br />
compared to other treatments. The biochemical stability <strong>of</strong> micro-aggregates with application<br />
<strong>of</strong> fertilizers only, was significantly lower in general. The control soils had the lowest<br />
polysaccharide content and hence biochemical stability. The addition <strong>of</strong> either FYM or lime<br />
with 100% NPK significantly increased carbohydrate content in the POM fractions obtained<br />
from aggregates at both the sites. Addition <strong>of</strong> FYM with 100% NPK significantly increased<br />
polyphenol content by 1.73 times and by 1.65 times in the POM fractions at BHNS and<br />
PTMB respectively.<br />
Long-term effect <strong>of</strong> manuring and fertilization on mean weight diameter (MWD),<br />
geometric mean diameter (GMD) and water stable macro aggregate (WSMA>0.25mm) at<br />
0-15 and 15-30 cm soil under rice-rice cropping system in Bhubaneswar and Pattambi<br />
Treatments<br />
Bhubaneswar<br />
MWD (mm) GMD (mm) WSMA >.25mm<br />
0-15 cm 15-30 cm 0-15 cm 15-30 cm 0-15 cm 15-30 cm<br />
50% NPK 0.88bc 0.92c 1.001e§ 1.003c 0.69c 0.74d<br />
444 | Page Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming, INM,<br />
soil-microorganisms-plant interactions
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
100% NPK 0.83c§ 0.88c 1.002c 1.002d 0.69c 0.72d<br />
150% NPK 0.90b 1.09b 1.003bc 1.003cd 0.74b 0.85c<br />
100% NPK + FYM 1.03a 1.29a 1.004a 1.004b 0.83a 0.95a<br />
100% NPK + LIME 1.08a 1.10b 1.002d 1.005a 0.75b 0.90b<br />
CONTROL 0.77d§ 0.68d§ 1.003b 1.001e§ 0.58d§ 0.53e§<br />
Pattambi<br />
50%NPK 1.00a 0.93c§ 1.003a 1.004bc 0.79ab 0.74c<br />
100%NPK 1.07a 1.03ab 1.004a 1.003d 0.86a 0.83b<br />
150%NPK 1.05a 1.05ab 1.005a 1.005a 0.85a 0.86ab<br />
100%NPK +LIME 1.03a 1.00b 1.004a 1.004ab 0.83ab 0.83b<br />
100%NPK +FYM 1.11a 1.09a 1.004a 1.005a 0.84a 0.87a<br />
CONTROL 0.99a 1.06ab 1.004a 1.003d§ 0.77b§ 0.77c§<br />
Conclusion<br />
The balanced NPK fertilization or integration <strong>of</strong> either FYM or lime with recommended<br />
doses <strong>of</strong> NPK (100%NPK) emerged effective management strategies for enhancing physical,<br />
chemical and biochemical stabilization <strong>of</strong> carbon for long-term carbon sequestration in<br />
Alfisols <strong>of</strong> India.<br />
References<br />
Wright, S.F. and Upadhyaya, A. 1999. Quantification <strong>of</strong> arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi<br />
activity by the glomalin concentration on hyphal traps. Mycorrhiza, 8(5), pp.283-285.<br />
Dubois, M., Gilles, K.A., Hamilton, J.K., Rebers, P.A.T. and Smith, F., 1956. Colorimetric<br />
method for determination <strong>of</strong> sugars and related substances. Anal.Chem., 28(3):350-<br />
356.<br />
T4-05R-1032<br />
Response <strong>of</strong> Microbial Consortia on Productivity <strong>of</strong> Sorghum (Sorghum<br />
BicolarL.) and Soil Quality under Rainfed Condition<br />
P.H. Gourkhede*, W.N. Narkhede, M.S. Pendke and R.S. Raut<br />
All India Coordinated Research Project on Dryland Agriculture<br />
Vasantrao Naik Marathwada Krishi Vidyapeeth, Parbhani-431402(MS), India<br />
* pathrikar2012@gmail.com<br />
Sorghum is grownon considerable area under rainfed condition in Marathwada region both in<br />
kharif and rabiseason. However, the productivity <strong>of</strong> sorghum particularly in kharif season is<br />
fluctuating. Also, sorghum is grown largely for fodder production in kharif season. Occurrence<br />
<strong>of</strong> frequent dryspells in Marathawada region is a common phenomenon which has a direct<br />
Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming,<br />
INM, soil-microorganisms-plant interactions<br />
445 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
impact on the production and productivity. Drought is one <strong>of</strong> the main environmental factors that<br />
negatively affect plant growth and development and productivity. In plants, drought is associated<br />
with other stresses, for example, osmotic stress produced by dehydration, which diminishes cell<br />
expansion. A microbial consortium involves two or more microbial groups living symbiotically.<br />
Consortia can be endosymbiotic or ectosymbiotic. Microbial consortium is specially formulated<br />
microbial inoculants. It contains N- fixing, P and Zn solubilizing and K mobilizing and plant<br />
growth promoting bacteria. To increase the productivity <strong>of</strong> sorghum in kharif season, an<br />
experiment was conducted to study the response <strong>of</strong> microbial consortia on productivity <strong>of</strong><br />
sorghum (sorghum bicolar L.) and soil quality under rainfed conditions <strong>of</strong> Marathawadaregion.<br />
Methodology<br />
The study was conducted at research farm <strong>of</strong> All India Coordinated Research Project on Dry<br />
Land Agriculture, VNMKV, Parbhani during kharif season 2018-20. The experiment comprises<br />
<strong>of</strong> seven treatments including two types <strong>of</strong> microbial consortia culture (C1 & C2) along with<br />
three methods (seed, soil and seed + soil) <strong>of</strong> culture application and was laid out in a randomized<br />
block design with three replications. Microbial consortia culture (C1& C2) was procured from<br />
ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad before sowing <strong>of</strong> the experiment. For seed treatment, microbial<br />
consortia culture (C 1&C 2 ) were applied @ 250g 10 Kg -1 <strong>of</strong> seed and for soil application 2.5 kg<br />
culture powder ha -1 were applied,immediately before sowing. The recommended doses <strong>of</strong><br />
chemical fertilizer were applied at the time <strong>of</strong> sowing.<br />
Results<br />
Yield and monetary returns:<br />
Application <strong>of</strong> microbial consortia significantly increased grain yield, straw yield and returns <strong>of</strong><br />
sorghum. Application <strong>of</strong> microbial consortia C 2 in T 6 (Seed treatment + Soil appication <strong>of</strong><br />
consortia 2) gave grain and straw yield i.e. 2510 and 7279 Kg ha -1 respectively as compared to<br />
other treatment. However, it was at par with treatment T 3 (Seed tresatment + Soil application <strong>of</strong><br />
consortia 1). Similar trend was recorded in case <strong>of</strong> gross returns (GR), net returns (NR) and B: C<br />
ratio. The production <strong>of</strong> proline and osmoregulantsenabled the crop to withstand the water stress<br />
due to dry spell. These isolates were capable <strong>of</strong> increasing shoot and leaf biomass, shoot length<br />
and photosynthesis. (Kavya et al. 2015)<br />
Grain yield, straw yield (Kgha -1 ), GMR, NMR and B: C ratio as influenced with use <strong>of</strong><br />
Consortia culture in sorghum<br />
Treatments<br />
Grain yield<br />
(Kg ha -1 )<br />
Straw yield<br />
(Kg ha -1 )<br />
G R<br />
(Rs.)<br />
N R<br />
(Rs.)<br />
B:C Ratio<br />
T 1: Seed treatment (C 1) 1952 4489 63243 38943 2.60<br />
446 | Page Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming, INM,<br />
soil-microorganisms-plant interactions
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
T 2: Soil application (C 1) 2140 5136 69978 45078 2.81<br />
T 3: Seed treatment+ Soil<br />
application(C 1)<br />
2485 6709 83494 58094 3.28<br />
T 4: Seed treatment (C 2) 1997 5592 67699 43399 2.78<br />
T 5: Soil application (C 2) 2018 6054 69621 44721 2.79<br />
T 6: Seed treatment + Soil<br />
application (C 2)<br />
2510 7279 85842 60542 3.39<br />
T 7: Absolute control 1938 5233 65118 42818 2.92<br />
SE 359 2521 2421 2801 0.69<br />
CD 1106 7767 7462 8630 2.14<br />
C 1 – Consortia culture 1 C 2 – Consortia culture 2<br />
Proline content:<br />
Proline content in sorghum leaf after harvest was significantly high (1.89 ug g-1) with treatment<br />
T6followed by treatment T3. The effect <strong>of</strong> microbial culture on proline content in sorghum leaf<br />
after dry spell was non-significant. Similar results were reported by Kalindee Shinde and Borkar.<br />
(2013) in sorghum seed bacterialization with four rhizobacterial isolate viz., Serratia marcescens<br />
L1SC8, Pseudomonas putida L3SC1, Enterobacter cloacae L1CcC1 and Serratia marcescens.<br />
L2FmA4 were found beneficial to mitigate drought stress effect in sorghum.<br />
Proline content (ug g -1 ) in sorghum leaf at after dry spell and at harvest stage as Influenced<br />
with use <strong>of</strong> consortia culture<br />
Treatments<br />
Proline content at<br />
flowering stage<br />
(ug g -1 )<br />
Proline content<br />
at Harvest<br />
(ug g -1 )<br />
T 1: Seed treatment <strong>of</strong> consortia (C 1) 0.90 1.09<br />
T 2: Soil application <strong>of</strong> consortia (C 1) 0.69 1.03<br />
T 3: Seed treatment + Soil application <strong>of</strong> consortia (C 1) 0.80 1.10<br />
T 4: Seed treatment <strong>of</strong> consortia (C 2) 0.86 1.18<br />
T 5: Soil application <strong>of</strong> consortia (C 2) 0.85 1.12<br />
T 6: Seed treatment + Soil application <strong>of</strong> consortia (C 2) 0.79 1.89<br />
T 7: Absolute control 0.07 0.88<br />
SE 0.02 0.44<br />
CD 0.06 1.36<br />
C 1 – Consortia culture 1 C 2 – Consortia culture 2<br />
Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming,<br />
INM, soil-microorganisms-plant interactions<br />
447 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Conclusions<br />
1. Use <strong>of</strong> treatment (T6) Seed treatment + Soil application <strong>of</strong> microbial consortia (C2)<br />
produced significantly higher Grain and straw yield, GMR, NMR and B:C ratio insorghum<br />
under moisture stress condition.<br />
2. The dual inoculation <strong>of</strong> microbial consortia culture (C2) through Seed treatment and<br />
soilapplication significantly increased moisture retention and proline content <strong>of</strong> soil<br />
atharvesting stages <strong>of</strong> sorghum crop.<br />
References<br />
Kalindee Shinde, S. and Borkar, S.G. 2018. ACC deaminase activity <strong>of</strong> bacterial species<br />
involved in conferring drought tolerance in sorghum (Sorghum biolorL). Int. J. Chemical<br />
Stud. 6(6): 1314-1316<br />
Kavya, Y., Trimurthulu, N., Vijaya Gopal, A., Madhu Vani. and Prasad, N. V. 2020. Effect <strong>of</strong><br />
inoculation <strong>of</strong> microbial consortia on soil physicochemical and nutrient status. British J.<br />
Appl. Sci. Tech., 39(4): 1-8<br />
T4-06R-1055<br />
Soil Moisture Stress Alters the Abundance <strong>of</strong> Maize Root Associated<br />
Bacteria<br />
M. Manjunath, N. Jyothilakshmi, S. Vijayalakshmi, S. K. Yadav, M. Prabhakar,<br />
K. A. Gopinath, G. Ravindrachary and V. K. Singh<br />
ICAR-Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, Santoshnagar, Hyderabad – 500 059,<br />
Telangana, India.<br />
Plants and microorganisms have coevolved over the years. The plant microbiome comprises<br />
<strong>of</strong> rhizospheric, endophytic and epiphytic microorganisms (Rout 2014). Rhizo-microbiome<br />
significantly influences the plant health, growth and productivity (Chaudhari et al. 2020).<br />
They play a vital role in managing various biotic and abiotic stresses. Increased scarcity and<br />
competition for water has become a key threat to food security and poverty alleviation.<br />
Drought considerably changes the composition <strong>of</strong> bacterial and fungal communities<br />
indicating that, this restructured microbiome might help the plant survival under adverse<br />
environmental situations (Santos-Medellin et al. 2017). Thorough knowledge <strong>of</strong> crop specific<br />
microbiome would help to modulate the microbiome in a way that would lead to better<br />
growth and development <strong>of</strong> crop plants (Rascovan et al. 2016). Keeping this in view, a study<br />
was conducted to know the effect <strong>of</strong> soil moisture stress on the composition <strong>of</strong> maize root<br />
associated bacteria.<br />
448 | Page Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming, INM,<br />
soil-microorganisms-plant interactions
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Methodology<br />
The total genomic DNA was isolated from 0.25 g soil sample using soil DNA isolation kit.<br />
Qubit 4.0 Fluorimeter was used to estimate the DNA concentration. V3-V4 region <strong>of</strong> 16S<br />
rRNA amplified using V3 forward primer and V4 reverse primer. The amplified product was<br />
checked on 2% agarose gel. NEB Next Ultra DNA library preparation kit was used for library<br />
preparation. The prepared libraries were sequenced in Illumina HiSeqplatform for 2x250bp<br />
read length. Raw sequence data was merged and filtered to get clean data. De novo chimeric<br />
sequences were detected using Vsearch and only non-chimeric sequence were further used.<br />
16S rRNA sequences were clustered into Operation Taxonomic Units (OTUs) at a similarity<br />
cut-<strong>of</strong>f value <strong>of</strong> 97% using the vsearch program (v2.11.1) and abundance <strong>of</strong> OTUs were<br />
recovered using v-search. OTUs were mapped at 97% sequence identity to an optimized<br />
version <strong>of</strong> the Ribosomal Database Project (RDP) database. Taxonomy was assigned to all<br />
identified OTUs using usearch program (v11.0.667). Sequence <strong>of</strong> OTUs were aligned using<br />
mafft (v7.407) and phylogenetic tree <strong>of</strong> identified OTUs was generated using fasttree (v<br />
2.1.10).<br />
Results<br />
Rhizo-microbiome <strong>of</strong> well-watered and drought stressed plants <strong>of</strong>maize was analyzed by<br />
sequencing V3-V4 region <strong>of</strong> the 16S rRNA gene. Differential abundance <strong>of</strong> bacterial classes<br />
was observed between well watered and drought stressed plants. Alpha Proteobacteria,<br />
Actinobacteria, Bacilli, Beta Proteobacteria, Gamma Proteobacteria and Acidobacteria GP6<br />
were 19.53 %, 10.98 %, 16.67 %, 5.05 %, 4.52 % and 3.81 % respectively in water stressed<br />
plants. In case <strong>of</strong> well watered plants, the classes <strong>of</strong> Alpha Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria,<br />
Bacilli, Beta Proteobacteria, Gamma Proteobacteria and Acidobacteria GP6 were 8.34 %,<br />
6.99 %, 42.09 %, 4.48 %, 3.57 % and 2.07 % respectively.<br />
Differential abundance <strong>of</strong> different classes <strong>of</strong> bacteria in (a) water stressed (b) well watered maize plants<br />
Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming,<br />
INM, soil-microorganisms-plant interactions<br />
449 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Conclusion<br />
Soil moisture stress altered the relative abundance <strong>of</strong> root associated bacteria <strong>of</strong> maize. There<br />
was an increase in the abundance <strong>of</strong> Alpha Proteobacteria and Actinobacteria under water<br />
stressed conditions as compared to well watered conditions.<br />
References<br />
Chaudhari, D., Rangappa, K., Das, A., Layek, J., Basavaraj, S., Kandpal, B.K., Shouche, Y.,<br />
Rahi, P. 2020. Pea (Pisum sativumL.) Plant shapes its rhizosphere microbiome for<br />
nutrient uptake and stress amelioration in acidic soils <strong>of</strong> the North-East Region <strong>of</strong><br />
India. Front.Microbio. 11:968.<br />
Rascovan, N., Carbonetto, B., Perrig, D., DoÂaz, M., Canciani, W., Abalo, M. 2016.<br />
Integrated analysis <strong>of</strong> root microbiomes <strong>of</strong> soybean and wheat from agricultural<br />
fields. Sci. Rep. 6: 280-84.<br />
Rout, M.E. 2014. The plant microbiome. Adv. Botan. Res. 69: 279–309.<br />
Santos-Medellín, C., Edwards, J., Liechty, Z., Nguyen, B. and Sundaresan, V. 2017. Drought<br />
stress results in a compartment-specific restructuring <strong>of</strong> the rice root-associated<br />
microbiomes. mBio. 8: e00764-17.<br />
T4-07R-1066<br />
Long Term Integrated Plant Nutrient Supply and in-situ Crop Residues<br />
Management Practices on Plant Nutrient Uptake and Soil Microbial<br />
Population Assessment in Rainfed Cotton under Vertisols<br />
V. Sanjivkumar 1 *, K. Baskar 1 , S. Manoharan 1 , M. Manikandan 1 , G. Guru 1 and<br />
G. Ravindrachary 2<br />
1 ICAR-AICRP on Dryland Agriculture, Agricultural Research Station, Kovilpatti, Tamil Nadu -<br />
628501.<br />
2<br />
ICAR-All India Co-ordinated Research Project on Dryland Agriculture, CRIDA, Hyderabad,<br />
Telungana state.<br />
* sanjivkumar.v@tnau.ac.in<br />
Cotton is one <strong>of</strong> the important cash crops and plays vital role in the economy <strong>of</strong> the country.<br />
India ranks second in world in area and production <strong>of</strong> cotton. The major production<br />
constraints <strong>of</strong> Vertisols are poor physical properties like low bulk density and hydraulic<br />
conductivity, formation <strong>of</strong> wide and deep cracks and narrow range <strong>of</strong> moisture for field<br />
operation. Now a days, the fertilizer requirements are increasing due to adoption <strong>of</strong> new high<br />
yielding hybrids in intensive cultivation. Therefore, to maintain crop productivity, the use <strong>of</strong><br />
450 | Page Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming, INM,<br />
soil-microorganisms-plant interactions
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
chemical fertilizers in balanced quantity is important. But looking into continuous increasing<br />
prices <strong>of</strong> fertilizers, it becomes necessary to minimize the expenses on fertilizers by using<br />
alternative sources like farmyard manure, crop residues, green manuring for sustaining the<br />
crop yields and soil fertility. The long-term integrated application <strong>of</strong> chemical fertilizers with<br />
organic manures improves soil physical and biological properties, soil fertility and crop<br />
yields.<br />
Methodology<br />
This research work was initiated during the year 2011-12. Every year rabi season, cotton (KC<br />
3) sowing has been taken in black soil farm (Vertisols) at the last week <strong>of</strong> September to find<br />
out the long-term effect <strong>of</strong> nutrient and combined effect <strong>of</strong> organic and inorganic nutrients on<br />
crop yield and soil fertility. The Kovilpatti region is the representative <strong>of</strong> dryland agriculture<br />
in Tamil Nadu. The depth <strong>of</strong> the black soil varies from 110 to 150 cm with the infiltration<br />
rate <strong>of</strong> 0.9cm hr -1 . Soil develops typical cracks with at least one cm wide and reaching a<br />
depth <strong>of</strong> 50cm or more in the period <strong>of</strong> moisture stress. Considering the mechanical fraction,<br />
the soil is clay ley with clay content <strong>of</strong> 46.4 to 61.2 per cent, 10.0 to 17.5 per cent silt and<br />
12.6 to 24.5 per cent coarse sand. The soil bulk density varies from 1.21 to 1.36 kg m -3 with<br />
the field capacity <strong>of</strong> 35 per cent and permanent wilting point <strong>of</strong> 14 per cent (Sunflower as an<br />
indicator plant). The soil has sub angular blocky structure with pH generally neutral to a<br />
tendency towards alkalinity at lower depths (7.8 to 8.2). The experiment was conducted in<br />
randomized block design (RBD) replicated thrice under rainfed condition. The treatments<br />
comprised <strong>of</strong> T1 - Control, T2 - 100 % RDF (40:20:40 NPK kg ha -1 ), T3- 50 % RDF (20:10:20<br />
NPK kg ha -1 ), T 4- 50 % N (crop residues), T 5 -50 % N (FYM), T 6 - 50 % inorganic N+ 50%<br />
organic N (crop residues) + P (50%) + K (50%), T7 -50 % Inorganic N+ 50% organic N<br />
(FYM) + P (50%) + K (50%), T 8 -100 % RDF + 25 kg ZnSO 4 ha -1 and T 9 - FYM @ 12.5 ha -<br />
1<br />
. As per the treatment schedule, the full dose <strong>of</strong> inorganic fertilizers and organic manures<br />
were applied as basal application. The initial soil status was <strong>of</strong> pH 8.13, EC 0.28 (dS m -1 ),<br />
and available NPK was 105, 11.2.and 345 kg/ha respectively<br />
Results<br />
In rainfed vertisols condition, long term application <strong>of</strong> 100 % RDF + 25 kg ZnSO4 ha -1<br />
recorded higher total plant nutrient uptake viz., nitrogen uptake (15.6 kg ha -1 ), phosphorus<br />
uptake (3.2 kg ha -1 ), potassium uptake (17.1 kg ha -1 ) and zinc uptake (18.20 mg kg -1 ) and it<br />
was followed by the treatments applied with 50 % Inorganic N+ 50% organic N (FYM) + P<br />
(50%) + K (50%) (Fig.1). Deshmukh et.al (2016) reported that the significantly higher uptake<br />
<strong>of</strong> nitrogen (40.30 kg ha 1), phosphorus, potassium (39.30kg ha-1), sulphur and zinc was<br />
recorded with the application <strong>of</strong> 125 % RDF (75:37.5:37.5 NPK kg ha -1 ) + Zinc @ 2.5 kg ha -1<br />
Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming,<br />
INM, soil-microorganisms-plant interactions<br />
451 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
over all other treatments. These results are conformity with the results obtained by<br />
Devrajet.al. (2011).<br />
Effect <strong>of</strong> integrated plant nutrient supply and insitu crop residue application on total plant nutrient<br />
uptake <strong>of</strong> cotton (KC 3) in Vertisols.<br />
Application <strong>of</strong> FYM @ 12.5 ha -1 under semi arid region <strong>of</strong> Kovilpatti deep black soils,<br />
registered higher microbial population viz., bacteria (8.6×10 6 CFU g -1 <strong>of</strong> soil), fungi<br />
(12.0×10 4 ) & actinomycetes (572.0×10 2 ) in rainfed cotton and it was followed by the<br />
treatment applied with 50 % N (FYM) alone.<br />
The lowest value was recorded in the untreated control plot. Similar study was reported by<br />
Patel et al., (2018).<br />
Conclusion<br />
In integrated nutrient management practices, the treatment applied over the long term,<br />
application <strong>of</strong> 100 % RDF + 25 kg ZnSO4 ha -1 registered higher total plant nutrient uptake<br />
viz., nitrogen, phosphorus and, potassium uptake. In case <strong>of</strong> microbial population viz.,<br />
bacteria, fungi and actinomycetes found superior with the application <strong>of</strong> FYM@12.5t/ha<br />
under semiarid rainfed condition in cotton crop and suitable for the Southern zone vertisols<br />
tract <strong>of</strong> Tamil Nadu.<br />
References<br />
Devraj, M.S., Bhattoo, B. S., Duhan. Promilla Kumara. and Jain, P.P. 2011. Effect <strong>of</strong> crop geometry<br />
and fertilizer levels on seed cotton yield and nutrient uptake <strong>of</strong> Bt. Cotton under irrigated<br />
conditions. J. Cotton Res. Dev., 25 (2):176-180.<br />
Deshmukh, P. W., Ingle, V. D., Paslawar, A. N., Bhoyar, S.M., Nandapure, S.P. and Deotalu, A.S.<br />
2016. Effect <strong>of</strong> moisture conservation techniques and fertilizer management on yield and<br />
uptake <strong>of</strong> cotton under high density planting system. Int. J. Agric Sci. Res., 6(3): 365-370.<br />
452 | Page Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming, INM,<br />
soil-microorganisms-plant interactions
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Patel, G., Dwivedi, B.S., Dwivedi, A.K., Thakur, R. and Singh, M. 2018. Long-term effect <strong>of</strong> nutrient<br />
management on soil biochemical properties in a Vertisol under soybean–wheat cropping<br />
sequence. J. Indian. Soc. Soil Sci., 66, 215- 221.<br />
T4-08R-1099<br />
On-farm Assessment <strong>of</strong> Site-Specific Nutrient Management in Rainfed<br />
areas <strong>of</strong> Telangana<br />
Kasthuri Rajamani 1 , P. Surendra Babu 2 , A. Madhavi 2 , T. Srijaya 2 and M. Goverdan 1<br />
1<br />
Regional Agricultural Research Station, PJTSAU, Palem-509217, Telangana, India<br />
2<br />
Agricultural Research Institute, Rajendranagr, PJTSAU, Hyderabad-501030, Telangana,<br />
India.<br />
Recent research (Chivengeet al., 2022) has demonstrated limitations <strong>of</strong> the blanket fertilizer<br />
recommendations practiced across Asia. On-farm research has clearly demonstrated the<br />
existence <strong>of</strong> large field variability in soil nutrient supply, nutrient use efficiency and crop<br />
responses. Thus, it was hypothesized that future gains in productivity and input use efficiency<br />
will require soil and crop management technologies that are knowledge-intensive and are<br />
tailored to specific characteristics <strong>of</strong> individual farms or fields to manage the variability<br />
among and within fields (Singhet al.,2022).Keeping this in view, the present study examines<br />
the extent <strong>of</strong> nutritional constraints and the scope <strong>of</strong> Site Specific Nutrient Management<br />
(SSNM) approach on productivity enhancement and livelihood improvement in dry land<br />
areas <strong>of</strong> Telangana.<br />
Methodology<br />
A total <strong>of</strong> ten on-farm trials were conducted with different test cropsviz., rice, maize, ragi,<br />
groundnut, sesamum, green-gram, black-gram, sorghum, bajra and castor in<br />
Nagarkurnooldistrictduring rabi season to evaluatesite specific nutrient management (SSNM)<br />
with target yield approach, blanket application <strong>of</strong> recommended fertilizers, soil test crop<br />
response (STCR) equation and farmers practice. After conducting farmers’ meeting in each<br />
village, and depending upon soil type, crop, slope and management practices, farmers’ fields<br />
were selected using stratified random methodology for demonstration <strong>of</strong> soil sampling<br />
procedure in one hectare. Further, crops were grown on selected farmers’ fieldswith known<br />
fertility statusby using SSNM based nutrient application with yield targetfertilizer<br />
prescription equations.The balanced nutrition included a recommended dose <strong>of</strong> fertilizer<br />
nutrients as N:P 2O 5:K 2O (kg acre -1 ) <strong>of</strong> 60:24:16 for rice, 25:14:8 for ragi, 96:32:32 for maize,<br />
8:16:19for groundnut, 24:8:8 for sesamum, 18:23:10 for green gram and black gram,<br />
36:16:16 for bajra, 40:24:16 for jonna and 32:16:12 for castor.Farmer’s practice in each trial<br />
was documented, which included suboptimal doses <strong>of</strong> N and P. Besides other crop<br />
Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming,<br />
INM, soil-microorganisms-plant interactions<br />
453 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
management practices like weeding and pest and disease control measures were followed,<br />
andthe data on crop yield was analyzed considering farmers as replications using one way<br />
ANOVA with randomized blocks on Bluestat.<br />
Results<br />
The soils are slightly acidic to strongly alkaline (pH 6.04 to 8.68) in reaction, whereas the<br />
electrical conductivity (EC) <strong>of</strong> selected villages <strong>of</strong> Southern Telangana Zone remains within<br />
safe limit with no salinity hazard (200 kg available nitrogen ha -1 . The available phosphorus (P 2O 5) ranged from 28.11 to<br />
89.03kg ha -1 with a mean value <strong>of</strong> 55.56 kg ha -1 , which indicating medium to high<br />
availability <strong>of</strong> phosphorus at farmers field. Important rabi crops (rice, maize, ragi, groundnut,<br />
sesamum, green-gram, black-gram, jonna, bajra and castor) <strong>of</strong> Nagarkurnooldistrict showed<br />
significant response to SSNM compared to blanket application <strong>of</strong> recommended fertilizers,<br />
soil test crop response (STCR) equation and farmers practice in all the locations. The seed<br />
yield (q acre -1 ) increased in all crops tested though by different levels. Target yield based site<br />
specific nutrient management approach registered highest yields (q acre -1 ) viz.,21.83in rice,<br />
31.66inragi, 35.09inmaize, 12.06in groundnut, 2.31in seamum, 3.57ingreengram,<br />
5.35inblackgram, 6.39in bajra, 17.24in sorghum and 20.83in castor.Further, the results<br />
revealed that the percent yield increased as 35.67 in rice, 28.80 in ragi, 34.24 in maize, 33.70<br />
in groundnut, 27.62 in sesamum, 23.14 in green gram, 21.32 in black gram, 23.60 in bajra,<br />
26.76 in jonna, 29.54 in castor cropsover farmers practice due to more precise application <strong>of</strong><br />
fertilizers in the study area.<br />
Initial soil values and yields <strong>of</strong> different crops<br />
Treatment<br />
pH<br />
EC<br />
(dSm -1 )<br />
OC (%) Ava. N (kg ha -1 ) Ava. P2O5 (kg ha -1 ) Ava. K2O (kg ha -1 )<br />
Yield<br />
(q acre -1 )<br />
Rice in Naganool<br />
FP 8.40 0.31 0.48 125.09 42.17 594.05 16.09<br />
RDF 8.16 0.36 0.42 150.18 51.54 654.53 18.31<br />
STCR 8.28 0.41 0.36 150.53 65.60 676.03 20.06<br />
SSNM-4 8.31 0.30 0.48 112.90 46.86 611.52 21.83<br />
Ragi in Kummera<br />
FP 6.04 0.11 0.42 117.81 51.54 600.77 24.58<br />
RDF 6.61 0.10 0.35 112.54 60.91 571.20 29.02<br />
STCR 6.84 0.15 0.39 87.81 56.23 555.07 30.11<br />
SSNM-4 8.20 0.23 0.42 112.90 46.86 576.58 31.66<br />
%<br />
Increase<br />
35.67<br />
28.80<br />
Maize in Palem<br />
FP 8.62 0.26 0.42 188.16 60.91 691.58 26.14<br />
454 | Page Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming, INM,<br />
soil-microorganisms-plant interactions
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
RDF 8.58 0.24 0.30 100.35 51.54 626.30 30.43<br />
STCR 8.68 0.30 0.45 188.16 51.54 659.90 33.32<br />
SSNM-4 8.49 0.24 0.36 100.35 42.17 657.22 35.09<br />
Groundnut in Kummera<br />
FP 8.54 0.25 0.36 100.35 60.91 573.89 9.02<br />
RDF 8.59 0.19 0.39 171.79 51.54 696.19 10.14<br />
STCR 8.41 0.24 0.48 125.44 60.91 614.21 11.13<br />
SSNM-4 8.54 0.26 0.42 175.62 51.54 571.20 12.06<br />
Sesamum in Kummera<br />
FP 8.30 0.39 0.39 193.79 65.60 637.82 1.81<br />
RDF 8.28 0.42 0.36 150.53 46.86 654.53 2.04<br />
STCR 8.22 0.21 0.42 107.81 56.23 620.93 2.10<br />
SSNM-4 8.38 0.38 0.42 137.98 74.97 649.15 2.31<br />
Green gram in Tummalasuru<br />
FP 8.02 0.13 0.27 102.72 56.23 628.99 2.90<br />
RDF 8.28 0.12 0.36 150.53 37.49 631.68 3.12<br />
STCR 8.05 0.14 0.42 137.98 74.97 511.78 3.29<br />
SSNM-2 7.72 0.13 0.39 137.98 28.11 676.54 3.57<br />
Black gramTummenapet Stage<br />
FP 7.96 0.28 0.30 112.90 89.03 513.66 4.41<br />
RDF 8.22 0.24 0.27 125.44 42.17 629.94 4.83<br />
STCR 7.93 0.20 0.39 105.26 28.11 619.58 5.02<br />
SSNM-4 8.17 0.20 0.27 190.70 28.11 478.18 5.35<br />
Bajra in Lingasanipalle<br />
FP 7.62 0.13 0.36 112.90 37.49 658.56 5.17<br />
RDF 8.23 0.15 0.42 125.09 70.29 529.79 5.82<br />
STCR 8.20 0.12 0.36 112.90 74.97 598.08 6.01<br />
SSNM-4 7.78 0.07 0.30 100.35 74.97 638.62 6.39<br />
Sorghum in Itholu<br />
FP 8.22 0.24 0.30 125.44 79.66 531.94 13.60<br />
RDF 7.37 0.09 0.43 125.09 89.03 693.50 15.12<br />
STCR 7.59 0.07 0.36 150.18 37.49 569.86 16.78<br />
SSNM-4 7.66 0.21 0.36 112.72 70.29 662.59 17.24<br />
Castor in Itholu<br />
FP 7.93 0.21 0.31 121.96 53.80 517.06 16.08<br />
RDF 8.13 0.15 0.40 135.14 39.85 487.49 18.61<br />
STCR 7.62 0.12 0.37 112.64 63.71 471.36 19.57<br />
SSNM-4 8.27 0.23 0.39 183.04 37.46 492.87 20.83<br />
References<br />
33.70<br />
27.62<br />
23.14<br />
21.32<br />
23.60<br />
26.76<br />
29.54<br />
Chivenge, P., Zingore, S., Ezui, K. S., Njoroge, S., Bunquin, M. A., Dobermann, A. and Saito, K.<br />
2022. Progress in research on site-specific nutrient management for smallholder farmers in<br />
sub-Saharan Africa. Field Crops Res., 281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2022.108503.<br />
Singh, S. P., Dutta, S., Jha, S., Prasad, S.S., Chaudhary, S.K., Manna, M.C., Majumdar, K.,<br />
Srivastava, P., Brahmanand, P. S., Singh, K. M. et al.,2022. Indigenous Nutrient Supplying<br />
Capacity <strong>of</strong> Young Alluvial Calcareous Soils Favours the Sustainable Productivity <strong>of</strong> Hybrid<br />
Rice and Maize Crops. Sustainability, 14, 11585. https://doi.org/ 10.3390/su141811585.<br />
Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming,<br />
INM, soil-microorganisms-plant interactions<br />
455 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
T4-09R-1437<br />
Integrated Nutrient Management Approach in Soybean (Glycine max L.,<br />
Merrill) Grown in Vertisols under Rainfed Condition <strong>of</strong> Malwa Plateau,<br />
Madhya Pradesh<br />
Bharat Singh*, K. S. Bangar, S. K. Choudhary, D. V. Bhagat, M. L. Jadav,<br />
A. Upadhyay, S. C. Tiwari, O. P. Girothia and Ramkumar Meena<br />
All India Coordinated Research Project for Dryland Agriculture,<br />
RVSKVV, College <strong>of</strong> Agriculture, Indore 452 001 Madhya Pradesh<br />
* singhbharat05@gmail.com<br />
Sustainable agriculture involves successful management <strong>of</strong> resources for increased<br />
agricultural production to satisfy changing human needs and maintaining soil and natural<br />
resources. Integrated nutrient management practices are one <strong>of</strong> the approaches for sustainable<br />
agriculture production. It involves combined application <strong>of</strong> chemical fertilizers along with<br />
organic manures, green manures, bi<strong>of</strong>ertilizers and other organic recyclable materials for crop<br />
production. Integrated nutrient management encourages the use <strong>of</strong> in-house organics waste;<br />
thus it saves on the cost <strong>of</strong> fertilizers for crop production and enhancing nutrient use<br />
efficiency (Thakur et al., 2011). A field experiment was conducted at All India Coordinated<br />
Research Project for Dryland Agriculture, RVSKVV, College <strong>of</strong> Agriculture, Indore during<br />
kharif <strong>of</strong> two consecutive years (2015 and 2016) on soybean (JS 95-60). Nine treatments<br />
were tested viz. T 1- Control, T 2- 100% NPK , T 3-100% NPK + Zn (20 kgha -1 ) , T 4-100%<br />
NPK + Zn (20 kgha -1 ) + S (10 kgha -1 ), T5-100% NPK + S (10 kgha -1 ) , T6-10 tha -1 FYM +<br />
50% NPK, , T 7-10 tha -1 FYM + (Rhizobium + PSB) + 50% NPK, T 8-10 tha -1 FYM +<br />
(Rhizobium + PSB) + 50% NPK + Zn + S and T9-10 tha -1 FYM + (Rhizobium + PSB) + 50%<br />
NPK + 5 tha -1 Residues + Zn + S. Based on average <strong>of</strong> two years data indicate that the<br />
highest grain yield <strong>of</strong> soybean (1156 kgha -1 ) was recorded in the treatment T 9-10 tha -1<br />
FYM+(Rhizobium+PSB)+50% NPK+5tha -1 residues+Zn+S, gross return (Rs. 46240ha -1 ) and<br />
B: C ratio (2.48) followed by T 8-10 tha -1 FYM+(Rhizobium+PSB) +50% NPK+Zn+S (1082<br />
kgha -1 ), T7: 10 t FYM+(Rhizobium +PSB)+ 50% NPK (1068 kgha -1 ); T6: 10 t FYM+50%<br />
NPK (1030 kgha -1 ), T4: 100% NPK+Zn + S (996 kg/ ha), T5: 100% NPK+S 10 kgha -1 (957<br />
kgha -1 ) and T 2: 100% NPK (923 kgha -1 ). The lowest grain yield <strong>of</strong> soybean was obtained in<br />
control treatment T1 - 731 kgha -1 which was significantly inferior to all treatments under<br />
study.<br />
456 | Page Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming, INM,<br />
soil-microorganisms-plant interactions
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Reference<br />
Thakur, R., Sawarkar, S.D., Vaishya, U.K. and Singh, M. 2011. Impact <strong>of</strong> continuous use <strong>of</strong><br />
inorganic fertilizers and organic manures on soil properties and productivity under<br />
soybean-wheat intensive cropping <strong>of</strong> a Vertisol. J. Indian Soc. Soil Sci., 59:74-79.<br />
T4-10R-1484<br />
Vertical Distribution <strong>of</strong> Different Pools <strong>of</strong> Soil Organic Carbon under Long<br />
Term Finger Millet Monocropping on Alfisols in Semi-Arid Tropical India<br />
B. G. Vasanthi, Mudalagiriyappa, M.C. Harish, K.M.Puneetha and K.Devaraja<br />
All India Co-ordinated research Project for Dryland Agriculture, UAS, GKVK,<br />
Bengaluru-560 065, Karnataka<br />
Due to intensive cultivation combined with lack <strong>of</strong> organic material inputs, have experienced<br />
increased degradation over the past several decades, especially evident in decline <strong>of</strong> soil<br />
organic carbon (SOC). Even though the mineral fertilizer recommendations are inadequate<br />
annual application <strong>of</strong> FYM along with NPK fertilizer sustains yield and soil productivity<br />
(Bhattacharyya et al., 2008). SOC levels at a point <strong>of</strong> time reflect the long-term balance<br />
between additions <strong>of</strong> organic carbon from different sources and its losses through different<br />
pathways. It influences most <strong>of</strong> the soil properties thereby affecting crop productivity. The<br />
combination <strong>of</strong> organic and inorganic fertilization enhanced the accumulation <strong>of</strong> SOC which<br />
is consistent with other studies. In contrast application <strong>of</strong> inorganic fertilizers has <strong>of</strong>ten<br />
produced contradictory effect on SOC concentrations and or its fractions enhancement (Ram<br />
and Singh, 2016). Despite these apparent benefits in soil properties, higher rate <strong>of</strong> manure<br />
application are likely contributing little to soil C stabilization. Conserving concentration <strong>of</strong><br />
soil organic matter above the threshold level is an important factor for increasing soil quality.<br />
Therefore, the integrated use <strong>of</strong> organic manure and inorganic fertilizers is widely recognized<br />
strategy for sustaining productivity and improving soil quality.<br />
In most case studies for SOC and SOC fractions have mostly focused on shallow surface<br />
limited information on soil pr<strong>of</strong>ile SOC and its fractions distribution is hindrance to<br />
conclusive identification <strong>of</strong> beneficial effects after long term fertilizer application. Therefore,<br />
the present investigation was to study organic carbon fractions like total organic carbon,<br />
permanganate oxidizable carbon, very liable carbon, liable carbon, less liable carbon at all<br />
four depths (0-15, 15-30, 30-45 and 45-60 cm) on Alfisols influenced by long term fertilizer<br />
application. Therefore, the outcome <strong>of</strong> the research would help to understand the assimilation<br />
pattern <strong>of</strong> carbon fractions under different fertilizer treatments through inorganically or in<br />
combination with manure.<br />
Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming,<br />
INM, soil-microorganisms-plant interactions<br />
457 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Methodology<br />
A long-term field experiment under finger millet (EleusinecoracanaL.) monocropping was<br />
established in 1978, at the All IndiaCoordinated Research Project for Dryland Agriculture,<br />
University <strong>of</strong> Agricultural Sciences, Bangalore, India. Theexperimental site is situated at<br />
latitude <strong>of</strong> 13°050 13.0″ north, longitude <strong>of</strong> 77°390 22.1″ east and an altitude <strong>of</strong> 929 mabove<br />
mean sea level, in the eastern dry zone <strong>of</strong> Karnataka.Soils in the experimental field belong to<br />
Vijaypura soilseries typical <strong>of</strong> the Alfisol order. The soils are typicallateritic and classified as<br />
fine, kaolinitic, isohyperthermic, TypicKandiustalf as per USDA classification with<br />
claycontent increasing with soil depth. These soils are yellowishred, lateritic and are derived<br />
from granite gneiss undersubtropical semi-arid climate. They are very deep,<br />
welldrainedsandy loam to sandy clay loam with clay contentincrease in depth and occur in<br />
nearly level to gently slopingareas.<br />
The experiment consisted <strong>of</strong> finger millet, monocropping, arranged in a randomized<br />
blockdesign with two replications and five treatments [T1: control(no fertilizer and no<br />
farmyard manure (FYM) applied), T2:FYM 10 t/ha, T3: FYM 10 t/ha + 50% NPK, T4: FYM<br />
at10 t/ha + 100% NPK and T5: 100% recommended NPK].The 100% recommended NPK<br />
application for finger milletwas 50 kg N, P and K per hectare as per thepackage <strong>of</strong> practices<br />
recommended by the University <strong>of</strong>Agricultural Sciences, Bangalore, based on largescaleexperimentation.<br />
The FYM was prepared using cow dungcollected from a unit<br />
maintained in the university, whereinthe bedding material was millet straw and the<br />
nutrientcontent was analyzed in the laboratory on fresh weight basis. The average<br />
composition <strong>of</strong> FYM consisted <strong>of</strong> 0.54, 0.35and 0.63% N, P and K, respectively. Soon after<br />
the rainfallin June, the land was ploughed to an average depth <strong>of</strong>15–20 cm, using a bullockdrawn<br />
country plough. After theinitial ploughing, FYM was applied according to<br />
treatmentand incorporated by harrow. The fertilizer N was applied as urea, while fertilizer P<br />
wasapplied as di-ammonium phosphate (DAP) and potassium asmuriate <strong>of</strong> potash (MOP).<br />
The experiment was conducted ona net plot size <strong>of</strong> 2.7 m 9 11.0 m with row 9 plant spacing<strong>of</strong><br />
30 cm 9 10 cm. Finger millet (GPU-28) monocropping involved finger millet in allyears. Soil<br />
samples were collected from each plot at a soil depth <strong>of</strong>0–15 cm after harvest <strong>of</strong> the crop.<br />
Statistical analysis<br />
The data were analysed using randomized blockdesign (RBD). Statistical analysis was<br />
performed byWindows based SPSS programme (ver. 10.0, SPSS Inc., 1996). The SPSS<br />
procedure was used foranalysis <strong>of</strong> variance (ANOVA) to determine thestatistical significance<br />
<strong>of</strong> treatments effect. Simple correlation coefficients andregression equations were also<br />
developed to evaluaterelationships between the response variables using thesame statistical<br />
package. The 5% probability level isregarded as statistically significant.<br />
458 | Page Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming, INM,<br />
soil-microorganisms-plant interactions
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Results<br />
Total organic carbon (TOC)<br />
The TOC concentration in soil layers varied depth-wise (Table 1). During 2020, the highest<br />
concentration <strong>of</strong> TOC was observed in 0–15 cm depth and exponentially decreased with<br />
increase in depth after each crop harvest. Depth 0–15 cm <strong>of</strong> 100% NPK+ FYM plots<br />
witnessed 146.36 % increased concentration <strong>of</strong> TOC at the harvest. The application <strong>of</strong> FYM<br />
during the years confined to build soil organic carbon on surface layers only. Cultivation only<br />
with balanced fertilization (NPK) and C supplementation (NPK+FYM) maintained or<br />
increased the TOC content while no fertilization treatments decreased it (Majumderet al.,<br />
2007). Despite, fertilizer treatment 100% NPK and FYM balanced the C: N ratio and energy<br />
for soil biota which helped in augmenting the TOC <strong>of</strong> the soil. Manjaiah and Singh (2001)<br />
also reported an annual estimated organic carbon input to the tunes <strong>of</strong> 8190 and 2780 kg ha −1<br />
in 100% NPK + FYM and 100% NPK treatments, respectively.<br />
Permanganaseoxidisable carbon (POXC)<br />
The POXC concentration in soil layers varied depth-wise. During 2020, the highest<br />
concentration <strong>of</strong> POXC was observed in 0–15 cm depth and exponentially decreased with<br />
increase in depth after each crop harvest. Depth 0–15 cm <strong>of</strong> 100% NPK+ FYM plots<br />
witnessed 23.21 %, increased concentration <strong>of</strong> POXC at the harvest. The application <strong>of</strong> FYM<br />
during the years confined to build soil organic carbon on surface layers only.<br />
Significantly higher libale carbon fraction <strong>of</strong> Very liable carbon, liable carbon and less liable<br />
carbon were observed in 100% NPK+ FYM (Table 2) in top layer <strong>of</strong> 0-15 cm which is <strong>of</strong><br />
39.23% , 177.78% and 40.78% higher than control, respectively. Within the labile carbon<br />
fractions higher value <strong>of</strong> very liable carbon fraction was found as compared to other two.<br />
The KMnO4 extractable C, which is considered as a labile C fraction <strong>of</strong> soil. The surface soil<br />
acquired more KMnO4 extractable C than sub-surface soil after harvests. Treatment 100%<br />
NPK + FYM showed significantly higher KMnO 4 extractable C over allother treatments at all<br />
depths after the harvest <strong>of</strong> both crops. Thebalanced applications <strong>of</strong> N, P and K (100% NPK)<br />
showed higher KMnO 4-C than that <strong>of</strong> control and unbalanced treatment. This indicatedthat<br />
the added FYM contributed to the KMnO 4 oxidized labile C fraction in soil which is<br />
composed <strong>of</strong>amino acids, simple carbohydrates, a portion <strong>of</strong> microbial biomass and other<br />
simple organic compounds (Zouet al., 2005). Also, the application <strong>of</strong> nitrogen ascribed the<br />
priming effect <strong>of</strong> applied N on freshorganic matter in soil which stimulated microbial action<br />
in decomposition <strong>of</strong> organic matter.<br />
Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming,<br />
INM, soil-microorganisms-plant interactions<br />
459 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Conclusion<br />
The highest and significant increase in passive pools humic and fulvic carbon was observed<br />
under combined application <strong>of</strong> FYM 10 t kg -1 + 100 % recommended NPK. Similarly, there<br />
was significant carbon build up and stabilization in this nutrient compared to all other<br />
practices. Highest concentration <strong>of</strong> soil organic carbon was observed in surface soil and<br />
exponentially decreased with increase in depth after each crop harvest. Hence application <strong>of</strong><br />
FYM along with NPK resulted in a significant positive buildup <strong>of</strong> all pools in the treatment at<br />
all four depths. Therefore, balance fertilization is panaceally important for sustaining<br />
improved soil health with balanced organic status and production potentiality <strong>of</strong> soil for<br />
finger millet monocropping.<br />
References<br />
Bhattacharjya, S., Bhaduri, D., Chauhan, S., Chandra, R., Raverkar, K.P. and Pareek, N.<br />
2017. [Comparative evaluation <strong>of</strong> three contrasting land use systems for soil carbon,<br />
microbial and biochemical indicators in North-Western Himalaya], Ecol. Eng.,<br />
103:21–30<br />
Majumder, B., Mandal, B., Bandyopadhyay, P.K. and Chaudhury, J. 2007. Soil organic<br />
carbon pools and productivity relationships for a 34 year old rice–wheat–jute agro<br />
ecosystems under different fertilizer treatments. Plant Soil, 297:53–67.<br />
Manjaiah, K. and Singh, D. 2001. Soil organic matter and biological properties after 26 years<br />
<strong>of</strong> maize–wheat–cowpea cropping as affected by manure and fertilization in Cambisol<br />
in semiarid region <strong>of</strong> India. Agri. Ecosyst. Environ., 86:155–62.<br />
Ram, S., Singh, V. and Sirari, P. 2016. Effects <strong>of</strong> 41 years <strong>of</strong> application <strong>of</strong> inorganic<br />
fertilizers and farm yard manure on crop yields, soil quality, and sustainable yield<br />
index under a rice-wheat cropping system on Mollisols <strong>of</strong> North India. Commun. Soil<br />
Sci. Plant Anal., 47 (2):179–93.<br />
Zou, X. M., Ruan, H. H., Fu, Y., Yang, X. D. and Sha, L.Q. 2005. Estimating soil labile<br />
organic carbon and potential turnover rates using a sequential fumigation-incubation<br />
procedure. Soil Biol. Biochem., 37:1923–28.<br />
460 | Page Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming, INM,<br />
soil-microorganisms-plant interactions
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-<br />
CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Effect <strong>of</strong> FYM and synthesised fertilizer application, on POXC and TOC under fingermilletmonocropping<br />
Treatment<br />
POXC<br />
0-15 cm 15-30 cm 30-45 cm 45-60 cm 0-15 cm 15-30 cm 30-45 cm 45-60 cm<br />
T 1: Control 0.42 0.35 0.35 0.29 4.40 4.19 3.48 2.25<br />
T 2: Only organic manure 0.52 0.42 0.36 0.25 6.85 3.89 4.60 3.58<br />
T 3: Organic manure+ 50% Rec. NPK 0.54 0.50 0.44 0.37 7.06 8.39 3.99 2.15<br />
T 4: Organic manure+ 100% Rec. NPK 0.59 0.54 0.53 0.40 10.84 7.57 4.19 4.50<br />
T 5: Only 100% Rec. NPK 0.45 0.41 0.41 0.35 5.62 3.68 3.99 3.48<br />
S.Em.± 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.08 0.07 0.01 0.03<br />
CD at 5 % 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.25 0.23 0.04 0.10<br />
POXC: Permanganaseoxidisable carbon, TOC: Total organic carbon<br />
TOC<br />
Effect <strong>of</strong> FYMand synthesised fertilizer application on oxidisable carbon fractions (very liable, liable and less liable carbon<br />
fraction) under fingermilletmonocropping<br />
Very liable carbon (g kg -1 ) Liable carbon (g kg -1 ) Less liable carbon (g kg -1 )<br />
Treatment<br />
15-30 30-45<br />
15-30 30-45 45-60 0-15 15-30 30-45 45-60<br />
0-15 cm<br />
45-60 cm 0-15 cm<br />
cm cm<br />
cm cm cm cm cm cm cm<br />
T 1: Control 1.30 1.13 1.01 0.89 0.45 0.40 0.38 0.26 1.03 0.77 0.69 0.22<br />
T 2: Only organic manure 1.45 1.16 1.01 0.74 1.14 0.68 0.43 0.04 1.14 0.83 0.61 0.58<br />
T 3: Organic manure+ 50% Rec. NPK 1.54 1.48 1.16 0.62 1.02 0.65 0.59 0.53 1.31 0.77 0.54 0.14<br />
T 4: Organic manure+ 100% Rec. NPK 1.81 1.36 0.95 0.56 1.25 0.32 0.24 0.09 1.45 1.00 0.36 0.31<br />
T 5: Only 100% Rec. NPK 1.45 1.04 0.92 0.53 0.45 0.19 0.16 0.12 0.46 0.31 0.20 0.07<br />
S.Em.± 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01<br />
CD at 5 % 0.02 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.04 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.04 0.03 0.02 0.02<br />
Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming, INM, soil-microorganisms-plant interactions<br />
461 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
T4-10aR-1624<br />
Conjoint Application <strong>of</strong> Nano-Urea and Conventional Fertilizers for<br />
Sustainable Crop Production<br />
Pravin Kumar Upadhyay*, V. K. Singh, B. S. Dwivedi, Abir Dey, G. A. Rajanna, Subhash<br />
Babu, Rajiv Kumar Singh, Sanjay Singh Rathore, Kapila Shekhawat, Meenakshi and<br />
Gaurav Shukla<br />
ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi- 110 012 (India)<br />
*pravin.ndu@gmail.com<br />
The nutrient supply needs to be synchronized with the crop demand to reduce nutrient losses and<br />
improve nutrient use efficiency. For this, several approaches have been adopted over the years,<br />
with varying success rates. Splitting <strong>of</strong> nutrient doses during the crop growth period, changing<br />
rate and method <strong>of</strong> application, soil test-based nutrient input, decision support systems,<br />
monitoring in-season crop N demand and real-time management, and novel fertilizer products<br />
are some <strong>of</strong> the technologies evaluated under field conditions. Whereas these studies advised<br />
several technology packages concerning the balanced use <strong>of</strong> plant nutrients in different crops and<br />
cropping systems, the R&D on fertilizer products could not receive desired attention.<br />
Nonetheless, researchers repeatedly underlined the necessity to give greater emphasis on the<br />
development and promotion <strong>of</strong> alternate novel fertilizers, besides improved agronomic<br />
management to enhance nutrient use efficiency to restore soil fertility and improve farm pr<strong>of</strong>it.<br />
Recently, we have evaluated one <strong>of</strong> the novel fertilizers developed by Indian Farmers Fertiliser<br />
Cooperative Limited i.e. nano-urea at ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi<br />
under maize-wheat and pearl millet-mustard cropping systems. The experiments were conducted<br />
with 8 treatments in a randomized complete block design (RCBD) with 3 replications.<br />
Treatments details <strong>of</strong> experiments undertaken<br />
S. No. Treatment Code Treatment details<br />
1 N0PK No N<br />
2 N50PK 50% <strong>of</strong> recommended N<br />
3 N75PK 75% <strong>of</strong> recommended N<br />
4 N100PK 100% <strong>of</strong> recommended N<br />
5 N0PK + Nano-N No N + 2 spray <strong>of</strong> Nano-N<br />
6 N50PK+ Nano-N 50% <strong>of</strong> recommended N + 2 sprays <strong>of</strong> Nano-N<br />
7 N75PK+ Nano-N 75% <strong>of</strong> recommended N + 2 sprays <strong>of</strong> Nano-N<br />
8 N100PK+ Nano-N 100% <strong>of</strong> recommended N + 2 sprays <strong>of</strong> Nano-N<br />
462 | Page Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming, INM, soilmicroorganisms-plant<br />
interactions
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
The recommended fertilizer doses were 150 kg N/ha, 75 kg P2O5/ha, and 75 kg K2O/ha for<br />
maize; 60 kg N/ha, 60 kg P2O5/ha, and 30 kg K2O /ha for pearl millet; 80 kg N/ha, 40 kg<br />
P2O5/ha, and 30 kg K2O /ha for mustard, and 120 kg N/ha, 60 kg P2O5/ha, and 60 kg K2O /ha for<br />
the wheat crop. Urea, single superphosphate, and muriate <strong>of</strong> potash were used to supply N, P,<br />
and K, respectively. In mustard and pearl millet, 50% <strong>of</strong> N (as per treatment) and 100% <strong>of</strong><br />
recommended P and K were applied as basal, and the remaining 50% N was top-dressed in one<br />
split. In wheat and maize, 50% <strong>of</strong> N (as per treatments) and 100% <strong>of</strong> P and K fertilizers were<br />
applied as basal, and the remaining N was top-dressed in two equal splits. Nano-urea was applied<br />
at 1250 ml/ha (per spray) as a foliar spray.<br />
Results<br />
Result revealed that yield <strong>of</strong> maize, wheat, mustard and pearl millet was significantly lower<br />
under N0PK + Nano-urea compared with N100PK and remained at par with N0PK. The plots<br />
under N50PK + Nano-urea received significantly lesser yield compared with N100PK. This<br />
indicates only application <strong>of</strong> nano-urea or nano-urea with N50PK could not suffice the<br />
requirement <strong>of</strong> the N in the crops and is not comparable with N100PK. On the other hand,<br />
application <strong>of</strong> N75PK + Nano-urea registered similar yields compared with recommended NPK<br />
applied plots, indicating towards a possibility <strong>of</strong> curtailing 25% <strong>of</strong> recommended N doses with<br />
two sprays <strong>of</strong> nano-urea. The soil mineral N were similar under the treatments N75PK + Nanourea<br />
and N100PK. On the other hand, curtailing <strong>of</strong> 50% or more in the recommended N doses<br />
leads to significant decrease in the mineral N in soil, irrespective <strong>of</strong> nano-urea application.<br />
T4-11P-1027<br />
Soil Organic Carbon Stock Changes in a Semi-Arid Alfisol under Heavy<br />
Carbon Loading<br />
K. Srinivas*, A. K. Indoria, S. S. Balloli, S. Suvana and K. Sammi Reddy<br />
ICAR-Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, Hyderabad, Telangana 500 059, India<br />
* k.srinivas1@icar.gov.in<br />
Small inputs <strong>of</strong> organic carbon or minor changes in management rarely, if at all, lead to<br />
measurable changes in soil organic carbon content or stock. A field study was carried out to<br />
investigate whether large additions <strong>of</strong> organic carbon would lead to measurable changes in soil<br />
organic carbon (SOC) stocks in an Alfisol under hot semi-arid climate, where soil organic carbon<br />
losses are high.<br />
Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming,<br />
INM, soil-microorganisms-plant interactions<br />
463 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Methodology<br />
The field experiment was conducted for four years during 2018-2021 at Hayathnagar research<br />
farm <strong>of</strong> ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad. Each year, for the four years, vermicompost (VC) and fresh<br />
gliricidia loppings (GL) were applied to soil at rates equivalent to 0, 2, 4 and 6 Mg C/ha<br />
(treatments) and incorporated thoroughly into the soil. Pigeonpea and castor were grown in<br />
rotation (pigeonpea in 2018 and 2020, castor in 2019 and 2021). Carbon input to soil by crops<br />
through litter was quantified. Carbon input through roots was estimated using shoot:root ratios<br />
(Srinivas et. al., 2017). Rhizodeposited C was estimated as 65% <strong>of</strong> root biomass (Bolinder et al.,<br />
2007). Total C input to soil was obtained by adding C inputs through treatments and crop C<br />
inputs. Soil bulk density and organic carbon from 0-20 cm and 20-40 cm depths were measured<br />
before the start <strong>of</strong> the experiment and at the end <strong>of</strong> 4 years, and soil organic carbon stocks were<br />
computed. Change in SOC stock up to 40 cm depth was computed as difference between stock<br />
after 4 years and initial stock<br />
Results<br />
Total carbon input by crops (4 years) ranged from 5.22 Mg/ha in control plots (no external C<br />
input) to 7.75 Mg/ha in plots that received 6 Mg C/ha every year through vermicompost taking<br />
the total C input in this treatment to 31.75 Mg/ha (24 Mg/ha through applied vermicompost and<br />
7.75 Mg/ha through crop). Soil organic carbon in the 0-20 cm depth, which was 3.14 g/kg before<br />
the start <strong>of</strong> the experiment, decreased slightly to 2.85 g/kg in control and increased to a<br />
maximum <strong>of</strong> 5.01 g/kg in the 6 Mg C/ha through vermicompost treatment. In the 20-40 cm<br />
depth, initial SOC <strong>of</strong> 2.44 g/kg decreased to 2.38 g/kg in control and increased to a maximum <strong>of</strong><br />
2.92 g/kg in the 6 Mg C/ha through vermicompost treatment. Changes in bulk density were small<br />
and statistically non-significant.The initial SOC stock up to 40 cm depth was 18.3 Mg/ha and it<br />
decreased by 0.53 Mg/ha in the control plots, while in the plots that received external C inputs,<br />
the carbon stocks increased. SOC stocks were significantly higher in the 0-20 cm depth over the<br />
20-40 cm depth. The highest C stock <strong>of</strong> 25.7 Mg/ha was recorded in plots that received 6 Mg<br />
C/ha through vermicompost. Increase in C stock as percentage <strong>of</strong> total C input (treatment C input<br />
+ crop C input) ranged from 15.8% in 4 Mg C/ha through gliricidialoppings to 23.4% in 6 Mg<br />
C/ha through vermicompost.<br />
464 | Page Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming, INM, soilmicroorganisms-plant<br />
interactions
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Total crop C input and soil organic carbon balance after harvest <strong>of</strong> 4 th crop (4 years <strong>of</strong> C<br />
inputs)<br />
Treatment<br />
Total<br />
crop C<br />
input<br />
0-20<br />
cm<br />
OC<br />
g/kg<br />
20-40<br />
cm<br />
BD<br />
Mg/m 3<br />
0-20<br />
cm<br />
20-40<br />
cm<br />
0-20<br />
cm<br />
C stock<br />
Mg/ha<br />
20-40<br />
cm<br />
0-40<br />
cm<br />
C stock<br />
(Final -<br />
Initial)<br />
C inputs<br />
Mg/ha<br />
Treatments Crop Total<br />
Stock<br />
change<br />
(% <strong>of</strong><br />
added)<br />
Control (No<br />
C)<br />
2 Mg C<br />
through VC<br />
4 Mg C<br />
through VC<br />
6 Mg C<br />
through VC<br />
2 Mg C<br />
through GL<br />
4 Mg C<br />
through GL<br />
6 Mg C<br />
through GL<br />
5.22 2.85 2.38 1.65 1.75 9.4 8.3 17.7 -0.53 0.0 5.22 5.22 --<br />
6.61 3.90 2.34 1.68 1.78 13.1 8.3 21.4 3.18 8.0 6.61 14.61 21.8<br />
7.28 4.31 2.36 1.69 1.75 14.5 8.2 22.8 4.53 16.0 7.28 23.28 19.5<br />
7.75 5.01 2.92 1.60 1.65 16.1 9.6 25.7 7.42 24.0 7.75 31.75 23.4<br />
6.56 3.67 2.35 1.72 1.73 12.6 8.2 20.8 2.53 8.0 6.56 14.56 17.3<br />
7.53 4.05 2.27 1.70 1.82 13.7 8.2 22.0 3.72 16.0 7.53 23.53 15.8<br />
7.11 4.55 2.45 1.67 1.77 15.2 8.7 23.9 5.65 24.0 7.11 31.11 18.2<br />
Initial - 3.14 2.44 1.62 1.66 10.2 8.1 18.3 - - - - -<br />
Conclusion<br />
Soil organic carbon stock increased with increase in C inputs. At the end <strong>of</strong> 4 years <strong>of</strong><br />
application <strong>of</strong> C inputs, a maximum retention <strong>of</strong> 23.4% <strong>of</strong> added C was observed with 6 Mg C/ha<br />
through vermicompost. The persistence <strong>of</strong> changes in SOC stocks after cessation <strong>of</strong> external C<br />
inputs needs to be investigated.<br />
References<br />
Bolinder, M.A., Janzen, H.H., Gregorich, E.G. Angers, D.A., Vanden-Bygaart, A.J., 2007. An<br />
approach for estimating net primary productivity and annual carbon inputs to soil for<br />
common agricultural crops in Canada. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ., 118 29–42.<br />
Srinivas, K., Maruthi, V., Ramana, D. B. V., Vimala, B., Nataraja, K. C., Sharma, K. L., Rao, M.<br />
S., Maheswari, M., Prabhakar, M., and Reddy, K. S., 2017. Roots <strong>of</strong> Rainfed Crops:<br />
Biomass, Composition and Carbon Mineralization. Research Bulletin 01/2017. ICAR-<br />
Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, Hyderabad, India. 68p.<br />
Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming,<br />
INM, soil-microorganisms-plant interactions<br />
465 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
T4-12P-1035<br />
Impact <strong>of</strong> Fertilizer Deep Placement on Yield and Nutrient Use Efficiency <strong>of</strong><br />
Direct Seeded Rice<br />
Jami Naveen 1* , K. Kurmi 2 , K. Pathak 2 , M. Saikia 2 , V. Kumar 3 , A. K. Srivastava 3 , S. Kundu 1 ,<br />
M. Sharmah 2 , K. Sai Teja 2 , A. Hazarika 2 and K. Sammi reddy 1<br />
1 ICAR- Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, Santhoshnagar, Hyderabad, Telangana, India<br />
2 Assam Agricultural university, Jorhat, Assam, India<br />
3<br />
International Rice Research Institute, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India<br />
*jaminaveen17@gmail.com<br />
Rice production needs to be increased by 1.2 to 1.5 per cent annually in order to meet the world's<br />
food needs (Dansoet al., 2021). To produce 1 kg <strong>of</strong> rice grain, 15–20 g <strong>of</strong> nitrogen (N) needs to be<br />
added. In Assam, rice is major staple food crop. It accounts for 2.54 million ha <strong>of</strong> the gross<br />
cropped area <strong>of</strong> 4.16 million ha and accounts for 96 per cent <strong>of</strong> the state's total food grain<br />
production (Anon 2021). In Assam, rice is grown in three distinct seasons: kharif or sali, boro, and<br />
ahu, in a variety <strong>of</strong> ecosystems including deep water, rain-fed, and irrigated conditions. Among<br />
these seasons, alirice is the most common because it receives the maximum amount <strong>of</strong> rainfall.<br />
Nitrogen availability is the major limiting factor in this season. A lerger part <strong>of</strong> the applied N<br />
fertilizer is losttrhoughvolatilization, denitrification, run-<strong>of</strong>f, leaching, and fixation (Gaihreet al.,<br />
2018). As a result, nitrogen use efficiencyis very low (30-35 percent) in rice cultivation. Fertilizer<br />
deep placement (FDP) <strong>of</strong> urea or multi-nutrient briquettes (N, P and K) is one <strong>of</strong> the best N<br />
management practices in lowland rice fields for achieving these multiple benefits. Deep placement<br />
<strong>of</strong> urea <strong>of</strong> larger size particle not only improves its use efficiency but also provides environmental<br />
benefits by reducing run<strong>of</strong>f and nitrogen volatilization losses. In the above backdrop, this study<br />
was conducted to find out the effect <strong>of</strong> fertilizer deep placement on N-use efficiency and<br />
performance <strong>of</strong> direct seeded rice.<br />
Methodology<br />
A field experiment was initiated in 2020 in the Instructional-Cum-Research (ICR) farm, Assam<br />
Agricultural University, in low land condition. The soil was sandy loam, acidic in reaction,<br />
medium in organic carbon and available N, low in available P2O5 and medium in available K2O. A<br />
long duration rice variety Ranjit-Sub1 was taken as test variety. The total amount <strong>of</strong> rainfall<br />
received during the crop growth period <strong>of</strong> first year was 1098.80 mm with a corresponding value<br />
<strong>of</strong> 650.80 mm in the second (2021) year. The experiment was laid out in a randomized block<br />
design, replicating three times with eight treatment combinations, viz., T1: Control (No Nitrogen),<br />
466 | Page Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming, INM, soilmicroorganisms-plant<br />
interactions
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
T2: Farmers’ practice (30-18.4-36 kg N-P2O5-K2O kg ha -1 ), T3:Recommended Dose <strong>of</strong> Fertilizer<br />
(RDF) @ 60-20-40 kg N-P2O5-K2O kg ha -1 with N in three splits @ 30-15-15 kg ha -1 at basal,<br />
active tillering (AT) and panicle initiation (PI), T4: Best management practices (BMP) as per IRRI:<br />
60-20-40 kg N-P2O5-K2O ha -1 with N in three equal splits at basal, AT and PI, T5: Fertilizer Deep<br />
Placement (FDP) with 120% N +100% PK <strong>of</strong> RDF, T6:FDP with100% NPK <strong>of</strong> RDF, T7:FDP with<br />
80% N +100% PK <strong>of</strong> RDF and T8: FDP with 60% N + 100% PK.<br />
Results<br />
Significantly higher number <strong>of</strong> panicles m -2 (317.52), total grins panicle -1 (217.72), filled grains<br />
panicle -1 (197.97), panicle length (27.90cm) and 1000-grain weight (20.15g) were observed<br />
under FDP with 120 percent N + 100 percent PK <strong>of</strong> RDF followed by FDP with 100% N +100%<br />
PK <strong>of</strong> RDF (298.02), (200.47), (178.48), (27.24cm) and (19.86 g) in both years.<br />
Significantlyhighest grain yield (49.33q ha -1 ), straw yield (65.20q ha -1 ) and harvest index (43.06<br />
per cent) were recorded in FDP with 120 percent N + 100 percent PK <strong>of</strong> RDF. The lowest values<br />
grain yield (19.70 q ha -1 ), straw yield (34.88q ha -1 ) and harvest index (36.03 per cent) were<br />
observed in control.<br />
The highest agronomic nitrogen use efficiency (42.34) was observed in FDP with 80% N +100%<br />
PK <strong>of</strong> RDF in both the years, whereas maximum recovery efficiency <strong>of</strong> nitrogen (0. 60),<br />
phosphorus (0.51), and potassium (0.97) was reported in the treatment FDP with 120 % N and<br />
100 % PK <strong>of</strong> RDF.The data clearly indicate that the deep placement <strong>of</strong> NPK briquettes enhanced<br />
the recovery <strong>of</strong> applied N, P and K compared to broadcast application <strong>of</strong> NPK fertilizers. Highest<br />
N partial factor productivity (0.92) was observed in FDP with 60 % N and 100 % PK <strong>of</strong> RDF.<br />
Pooled effect <strong>of</strong> fertilizer management practices on nitrogen agronomic efficiency, partial<br />
factor productivity <strong>of</strong> nitrogen and recovery efficiency <strong>of</strong> nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium<br />
in direct seeded rice<br />
Treatment<br />
N Agronomic<br />
efficiency<br />
(kg grainincrease/kg<br />
N applied)<br />
Partial factor<br />
productivity<br />
(kg grain/kg N<br />
applied)<br />
Recovery efficiency (kg<br />
taken up /kg applied)<br />
N P K<br />
T 1: Control - - - - -<br />
T 2: Farmers’ practice 22.40 0.88 0.26 0.09 0.19<br />
T 3: RDF as per AAU 30.17 0.63 0.42 0.24 0.45<br />
T 4: BMP as per IRRI: 30.82 0.64 0.43 0.24 0.46<br />
T 5:FDP with 120% N 41.15 0.69 0.60 0.51 0.97<br />
Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming,<br />
INM, soil-microorganisms-plant interactions<br />
467 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
+100% PK<br />
T 6:FDP with 100% N<br />
+100% PK<br />
T 7:FDP with 80% N +100%<br />
PK<br />
T 8:FDP with 60% N +100%<br />
PK<br />
41.35 0.74 0.59 0.44 0.81<br />
42.34 0.83 0.58 0.36 0.67<br />
36.86 0.92 0.46 0.26 0.46<br />
Conclusion<br />
Overall, the results <strong>of</strong> this study indicated that using FDP with 120% N and 100% PK <strong>of</strong> RDF in<br />
Kharifcould be considered the best nutrient management practice for rice in terms <strong>of</strong> highest<br />
yield, N, P, and K recovery efficiency in direct seeded rice.<br />
References<br />
Anonymous. 2021. Rice Knowledge Bank, Assam https://www.rkbassam.in/<br />
Danso, F., Agyare, W. A. and Bart-Plange, A. 2021.Modelling rice yield from biochar-inorganic<br />
fertilizer amended fields. J. Agric. Food Res., 4:100123.<br />
Gaihre, Y. K., Singh, U., Islam, S. M., Huda, A., Islam, M. R., Sanabria, J. and Jahan, M. 2018.<br />
Nitrous oxide and nitric oxide emissions and nitrogen use efficiency as affected by<br />
nitrogen placement in lowland rice fields. Nutr. Cycling Agroecosyst. 110(2): 277-291.<br />
T4-13P-1058<br />
Sowing dates and Nutrient Management Practices in Spring-Summer Black<br />
Gram [Vigna Mungo (L.) Hepper] For Optimization <strong>of</strong> Growth and<br />
Production<br />
Purabi Banerjee 1,2 , V. Visha Kumari 2 and Rajib Nath 1<br />
1 Bidhan Chandra Krishi Viswavidyalaya, Mohanpur 741252, Nadia, West Bengal, India.<br />
2 ICAR-Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, Santoshnagar, Hyderabad 500059,<br />
Telangana, India<br />
Black gram [Vigna mungo (L.) Hepper] is a widely grown pulse crop assuming considerable<br />
important for food and nutritional security in India. Various research efforts have revealed the<br />
crucial and diverse roles <strong>of</strong> the nutrient elements, i.e., cobalt (Co), potassium (K) and boron (B)<br />
in overall development <strong>of</strong> pulse crops (Banerjee et al., 2021a).Besides, foliar nutrition at the<br />
onset <strong>of</strong> reproductive phase is incredibly effective in mitigating physiological shortcomings in<br />
468 | Page Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming, INM, soilmicroorganisms-plant<br />
interactions
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
legumes including premature shedding <strong>of</strong> flower and pod and thus increasing seed yield,<br />
exclusively established in case <strong>of</strong> black gram (Banerjee et al., 2021b). Against this background,<br />
a two-year experiment was framed with an objective to evaluate the crucial and diverse role <strong>of</strong><br />
the Co, K and B on growth, yield and quality <strong>of</strong> black gram.<br />
Methodology<br />
A field experiment was conducted in A-B Block (District Seed Farm), B.C.K.V., Kalyani, West<br />
Bengal, India during the subsequent spring-summer seasons <strong>of</strong> 2020 and 2021. Black gram<br />
(variety: Pant Urd 31) was sown. The experiment was laid out in a split-split plot design<br />
replicated thrice with two sowing dates (March first week and March third week) in main plot,<br />
two soil application levels <strong>of</strong> cobalt (No cobalt and cobalt at 4 kg ha −1 ) in sub-plots and five<br />
foliar sprays <strong>of</strong> K and B at flower initiation stage in various combinations (no spray, spray <strong>of</strong> tap<br />
water, 1.25%K, 0.2%B and1.25%K + 0.2%B) in sub-sub plots.<br />
Results<br />
The pooled analysis <strong>of</strong> the data has shown that March1 st week sown crop exhibited a higher<br />
growth rate compared to the March 3 rd week sown crop, thisresulted in higher production. The<br />
Co application as basal dose recorded significantly higher growth and yield attributes <strong>of</strong> black<br />
gram over without application <strong>of</strong> Co. Foliar K+B application significantly increased (p≤0.05) dry<br />
matter accumulation (178.7 g m -2 ), number <strong>of</strong> root nodules plant -1 (43.6), crop growth rate<br />
(CGR: 4.76) and no. <strong>of</strong> pods plant -1 (41.2), which resulted in higher seed yield (1481.4 kg ha -1 .<br />
Seed yield <strong>of</strong> black gram was found to be a linear function <strong>of</strong> number <strong>of</strong> pods per plant,<br />
explaining about 96.59 and 93.98 % variations respectively during 2020 and 2021.<br />
Growth, yield and quality <strong>of</strong> black gram as influenced by date <strong>of</strong> sowing, soil application<br />
and foliar nutrition during spring-summer season (pooled)<br />
Treatment<br />
Dry matter<br />
(g m -2 )<br />
Number <strong>of</strong><br />
Nodules plant -1<br />
CGR<br />
(g m -2 day -1 )<br />
Pods<br />
plant -1<br />
Seed yield<br />
(kg ha -1 )<br />
March 1 st week 170.3 41.4 4.44 33.8 1251.9<br />
March 3 rd week 162.1 37.9 4.35 30.9 1120.7<br />
S.Em(+) 0.17 0.08 0.01 0.29 6.15<br />
L.S.D. (P=0.05) 1.04 0.51 0.09 1.71 17.94<br />
No cobalt 161.9 37.7 4.28 27.7 1095.4<br />
Cobalt at 4 kg ha -1 170.5 41.6 4.46 34.0 1277.2<br />
S.Em(+) 0.45 0.12 0.03 0.33 4.25<br />
L.S.D. (P=0.05) 1.86 0.49 0.10 1.30 16.59<br />
Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming,<br />
INM, soil-microorganisms-plant interactions<br />
469 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
No spray 155.5 36.2 3.98 19.7 858.6<br />
Tap water 159.1 37.4 4.28 25.4 1048.4<br />
1.25% K 165.9 39.6 4.32 31.1 1200.2<br />
0.2% B 171.9 41.4 4.55 36.4 1342.8<br />
1.25% K + 0.2% B 178.7 43.6 4.76 41.2 1481.4<br />
S.Em(+) 0.73 0.24 0.05 0.41 9.07<br />
L.S.D. (P=0.05) 2.09 0.70 0.19 1.18 26.13<br />
Conclusion<br />
Sowing in March first week in combination with basal soil application <strong>of</strong> Co at 4 kg ha −1 and<br />
foliar nutrition <strong>of</strong> K (1.25%) and B (0.2%) at flower initiation stage have immense potential to<br />
intensify black gram growth and production. Even in case <strong>of</strong> delayed sowing, application <strong>of</strong> Co<br />
in soil combined with K+B foliar spray can sustain optimum production potential <strong>of</strong> black gram<br />
during spring-summer season in Eastern India.<br />
References<br />
Banerjee, P., Mukherjee, B., Venugopalan, V. K., Nath, R., Chandran, M. A. S., Dessoky, E. S., Ismail, I.<br />
A., El-Hallous, E. I. and Hossain, A. (2021a). Thermal Response <strong>of</strong> Spring–Summer-Grown<br />
Black Gram (Vigna mungo L. Hepper) in Indian Subtropics. Atmosphere, 12, 1-20.<br />
Banerjee, P., Venugopalan, V.K., Nath, R., Althobaiti, Y.S., Gaber, A., Al-Yasi, H. and Hossain, A.<br />
(2021b). Physiology, Growth and Productivity <strong>of</strong> Spring–Summer Black Gram (Vigna mungo L.<br />
Hepper) as Influenced by Heat and Moisture Stresses in Different Dates <strong>of</strong> Sowing and Nutrient<br />
Management Conditions. Agron.11, 1-24.<br />
T4-14P-1060<br />
Effect <strong>of</strong> N Fertilization on Grain N Content and Productivity <strong>of</strong> Rice and<br />
Maize<br />
Surajit Mondal 1 , Rakesh Kumar 1 , J.S. Mishra 1 , V.K. Singh 2 , Anchal Dass 2 ,<br />
A.K. Choudhary 1 and A. Upadhyaya 1<br />
1 ICAR Research Complex for Eastern Region, Patna – 800 014, Bihar, India<br />
2 ICAR Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi – 110 012, India<br />
The indiscriminate use <strong>of</strong> fertilizer degrades the soil health and pollutes the environment<br />
(Galloway et al., 2008) while lower use <strong>of</strong> fertilizer is causing lower productivity. Hence,<br />
fertilizer application must be optimized for sustainable higher yield, lower cost <strong>of</strong> cultivation and<br />
a cleaner and environment-friendly production system (Zhang et al., 2015). Rice and maize are<br />
470 | Page Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming, INM, soilmicroorganisms-plant<br />
interactions
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
the major consumers <strong>of</strong> nitrogen fertilizer and need optimization in terms <strong>of</strong> input use efficiency.<br />
Grain quality should also be emphasized for achieving nutritional security.<br />
Methodology<br />
Field experiments on maize and rice are being implemented during rabi2020-21andkharif 2021,<br />
respectively, at the experimental farm <strong>of</strong> ICAR Research Complex for Eastern Region, Patna to<br />
evaluate the effect <strong>of</strong> different doses <strong>of</strong> nitrogen (N) on yield parameter <strong>of</strong> rice, and N content <strong>of</strong> leaf<br />
at different growth stages <strong>of</strong> rice and maize. The treatments were 0 to 240 kg N ha -1 at 40 kg intervals<br />
(N0 to N240). Varieties used were TM 214, S2 946, S2 981, 2ATM211 and 2ATM214 for maize,<br />
and Swarna Shreya, Swarna Samridhidhan, Swarna Shakti, Swarna SukhaDhan and RCPR 58 for<br />
rice. N was applied at three equal splits. Each 1/3 rd <strong>of</strong> N was applied at seeding, knee height and<br />
tasseling stages for maize and at transplantation, maximum tillering and panicle initiation stages for<br />
rice.<br />
Results<br />
The impact <strong>of</strong> different nitrogen doses on grain yield <strong>of</strong> maize and rice was clearly discernible (Fig).<br />
The grain yield <strong>of</strong> maize increased with an increase in N-dose up to 200 kg N ha -1 and beyond that,<br />
no significant gain in yield was noted with additional N-application. The lowest yield <strong>of</strong> 3.87 t ha -<br />
1 was noted in N0 while the highest yield <strong>of</strong> 8.06 t ha -1 was noted in 240 kg N ha -1 and it was at par<br />
with 200 kg N ha -1 . Among the different genotypes, S2 946 and S2 981 recorded maximum (6.63 t<br />
ha -1 ) and minimum (5.01 t ha -1 ), respectively.In contrast to maize, rice grain yield increased up to an<br />
N dose <strong>of</strong> 80 kg ha-1; beyond that, yield was similar. The lowest and highest yield <strong>of</strong> rice was<br />
registered in 0 kg N ha -1 (3.34 t ha -1 ) and 160 kg N ha -1 (4.94 t ha -1 ).However, the effect <strong>of</strong> genotype<br />
was absent on rice yield and all genotypes noted similar yield (4.25-4.57 t ha -1 ).<br />
Yield <strong>of</strong> maize and rice as affected by different doses <strong>of</strong> N.Mean values followed by different small letters<br />
within N-dose or genotypes are significantly different at P < 0.05 by DMRT.<br />
Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming,<br />
INM, soil-microorganisms-plant interactions<br />
471 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
The correlation between yield and N-dose was significant for both rice and wheat (data not<br />
presented). The yield increase for each kg <strong>of</strong> N was 19.25 and 4.88 kg for maize and rice,<br />
respectively. A quadratic function was also fitted with the yield and N- dose and data and the<br />
most pr<strong>of</strong>itable fertilizer dose was worked out as 211 and 159 kg N ha -1 for maize and rice,<br />
respectively. An N dose <strong>of</strong> 200 kg ha -1 registered the highest agronomic efficiency (AE) for<br />
maize while the same was 80 kg N ha -1 for rice. However, for partial factor productivity (PFP)<br />
irrespective <strong>of</strong> crops, the highest value was noted for 40 kg N ha -1 while the lowest was for 240<br />
kg N ha -1 .<br />
Mean values followed by different small letters within N-dose or genotypes are significantly<br />
different at P < 0.05 by Duncan’s Multiple Range Test.The grain N content <strong>of</strong> rice was<br />
significantly affected by different amounts <strong>of</strong> nitrogen and genotypes. The lowest grain N<br />
content was 1.09% for 0 kg N ha -1 while the highest was 1.49 for 240 kg N ha -1 . Among rice<br />
genotypes, the highest N content <strong>of</strong> grain was observed for Swarna Samridhi (1.39%) and the<br />
lowest was for RCPR 58 (1.24%).<br />
Conclusions<br />
Higher production <strong>of</strong> high-quality grain (higher grain N content) requires higher application <strong>of</strong><br />
fertilizer and greater uptake by crops.The maize was more responsive to fertilizer N than rice.<br />
Hence, fertilizer level must be optimized to balance grain yield, grain N content and pr<strong>of</strong>it.<br />
References<br />
Galloway, J. N., Townsend, A. R., Erisman, J. W., Bekunda, M., Cai, Z., Freney, J. R. and<br />
Sutton, M. A. 2008. Transformation <strong>of</strong> the nitrogen cycle: recent trends, questions, and<br />
potential solutions. Science, 320(5878): 889 – 892.<br />
Zhang, X., Davidson, E. A., Mauzerall, D. L., Searchinger, T. D., Dumas, P. and Shen, Y. 2015.<br />
Managing nitrogen for sustainable development. Nature. 528(7580): 51 – 59.<br />
472 | Page Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming, INM, soilmicroorganisms-plant<br />
interactions
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Integrated Approach for Zinc Enrichment in Rainfed Maize<br />
P. Nandini 1* , P. Laxminarayana 1 , K. Bhanu Rekha 1 and T. Anjaiah 2<br />
T4-15P-1064<br />
1 Department <strong>of</strong> Agronomy, 2 Deparment <strong>of</strong> Soil Science and Agricultural Chemistry,<br />
College <strong>of</strong> Agriculture, Pr<strong>of</strong>essor Jayashankar Telangana State Agricultural University, Rajendranagar,<br />
Hyderabad-500030, Telangana, India<br />
* nandu60109@gmail.com<br />
Maize (Zea mays L) the ‘Queen <strong>of</strong> Cereals’ is the third most important cereal crop in the world.<br />
Agronomic zinc bi<strong>of</strong>ortification in maize is useful to overcome the hidden hunger for Zn<br />
(Muhammad and Abdul, 2018). Zinc solubilising bacteria are capable <strong>of</strong> solubilizing ZnO,<br />
ZnCO3 and zinc phosphate through production and excretion <strong>of</strong> organic acids (Sruthi, 2013).<br />
Micronutrients like Zn, Fe, B, Mo etc., are mostly used in polymer coating. Polymers are mostly<br />
used in coating <strong>of</strong> fertilizers for slow release <strong>of</strong> fertilizer from polymer coated fertilizers<br />
(Shahzad et al., 2019).<br />
Methodology<br />
The experiment was conducted during Kharif, 2019at College Farm (Plot no. B-8, Block-B),<br />
College <strong>of</strong> Agriculture, Rajendranagar, PJTSAU, Hyderabad. The experimental site was located<br />
at 17°19' 19.2" N Latitude, 78°24' 39.2” E Longitude at an altitude <strong>of</strong> 542.3 m above mean sea<br />
level and lies under Southern Telangana Zone.Maize hybrid NK-6240 @ 20 kg ha -1 was sown on<br />
ridges at spacing <strong>of</strong> 60 cm × 20 cm. Recommended dose <strong>of</strong> fertilizer (RDF- 200: 60: 50-N: P2O5:<br />
K2O kg ha -1 ) N was applied in three equal splits (at sowing, knee-high and tasseling stage), total<br />
P was applied as basal and K was applied in two equal splits (at sowing and tasseling stage).<br />
Crop was entirely grown under rainfall which accounted to 680.8 mm.<br />
Results<br />
Plant height has shown a linear increase at all the stages <strong>of</strong> crop period. A perusal <strong>of</strong> data<br />
revealed that plant height significantly influenced by integrated approach for zinc enrichment at<br />
30 DAS, knee high stage and at harvest except at 60 DAS. On the whole, significant variation in<br />
the plant height with T5 and T7 might be due to rapid cell division and elongation as a result <strong>of</strong><br />
availability <strong>of</strong> the needed nutrients to the plant at critical growth stages coupled with application<br />
<strong>of</strong> zinc might have resulted in improvement <strong>of</strong> metallo enzyme system regulatory function and<br />
growth promoting auxin production resulting in increased plant height linearly. Similar results<br />
were earlier reported by Hekmatet al. (2019).<br />
Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming,<br />
INM, soil-microorganisms-plant interactions<br />
473 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Number <strong>of</strong> Leaves Per Plant<br />
The number <strong>of</strong> leaves per plant recorded at 30 DAS, knee high stage, 60 DAS and at harvest. A<br />
scrutiny <strong>of</strong> data revealed that no. <strong>of</strong> leaves in maize differed significantly due to treatments at all<br />
the stages <strong>of</strong> observation except at 30 DAS.No. <strong>of</strong> leaves produced by plant at different stages<br />
increased linearly from 30 DAS to harvest. At knee high stage, 60 DAS and at harvest, highest<br />
number <strong>of</strong> leaves was recorded with T5 {RDF + FYM enrichment with 50 kg ZnSO4 ha -1 } and<br />
was on par with other treatments viz., T2, T4, T7 and T10. The lowest number <strong>of</strong> leaves was<br />
registered with T1 [RDF alone (Control) N: P2O5: K2O - 200:60:50 kg ha -1 ]. From the results it is<br />
inferred that number <strong>of</strong> leaves per plant has shown a gradual increase from seedling to vegetative<br />
stage. Similar trend was also observed by Hekmatet al. (2019) and Singh et al. (2016).<br />
Conclusion<br />
The growth parameters were significantly higher with treatments that consisted <strong>of</strong> conjunctive<br />
Zn application along with organic manures (FYM and inorganic fertilizers), T5 (RDF + FYM<br />
enrichment with 50 kg ZnSO4 ha -1 ) and also shown on par results with T7 {RDF + ZSB (1kg/100<br />
kg FYM) + 0.2% Foliar spray <strong>of</strong> ZnSO4 (Knee-high and Tasseling stages)}.<br />
References<br />
Hekmat, A.W., Mohammadi, N.K. and Ghosh, G. 2019. Effect <strong>of</strong> NPK, bi<strong>of</strong>ertilizer and zinc<br />
foliar nutrition on growth and yield attributes <strong>of</strong> baby corn (Zea mays L.). In. J.<br />
Chemical Stud., 7(4): 2432-2436.<br />
Muhammad, A.M. and Abdul, R.B. 2018. Zinc bi<strong>of</strong>ortification <strong>of</strong> maize (Zea mays L.): Status<br />
and challenges. Plant Breed., 138:1–28.<br />
Shahzad, R., Akbar, S., Jamil, S., Javed, M.A., Jamil, M.W., Fatima, N. and Iqbal, M.Z. 2019.<br />
Polymer coating based enhancement <strong>of</strong> fertilizer use efficiency and growth <strong>of</strong> wheat<br />
crop. Int. J. Biosci.14(2): 562-572.<br />
Singh, G., Singh, N. and Kaur, R. 2016. Integrated nutrient management for increasing growth<br />
with sustainability <strong>of</strong> baby corn. Int. J. Bioassays. 5 (2): 4817-4820.<br />
Sruthi, P. 2013. Studies on Zinc solubilizing bacteria and their effect on growth and yield <strong>of</strong><br />
maize (ZeaMaysL.). MSc (Ag) thesis submitted to UAS, Dharwad. 1:72.<br />
474 | Page Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming, INM, soilmicroorganisms-plant<br />
interactions
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
T1<br />
T2<br />
Effect <strong>of</strong> Integrated approach for zinc enrichment in rainfed maize on number <strong>of</strong> leaves<br />
plant -1 at 30 DAS, knee-high, 60 DAS and at harvest<br />
Treatments<br />
RDF alone (Control) [N: P 2O 5: K 2O -<br />
200:60:50 kg ha -1 ]<br />
RDF + Zinc Solubilising Bacteria (ZSB @<br />
1kg/100 kg FYM)<br />
30<br />
DAS<br />
No. <strong>of</strong> leaves per plant<br />
Knee-high<br />
stage<br />
60 DAS At harvest<br />
4.33 4.93 10.97 12.50<br />
4.53 5.53 13.37 14.20<br />
T3 RDF + FYM (25 t ha -1 ) 4.8 5.73 12.87 13.87<br />
T4 RDF + Seed pelleting (3.6 g ZnSO 4 kg -1 seed) 4.73 5.80 12.87 13.87<br />
T5 RDF + FYM enrichment with 50 kg ZnSO 4 ha -1 4.87 6.47 14.27 15.50<br />
T6<br />
T7<br />
T8<br />
T9<br />
T10<br />
RDF + 0.2% Foliar spray <strong>of</strong> ZnSO 4 (Knee-high<br />
and Tasseling stages)<br />
RDF + ZSB (1kg/100 kg FYM) + 0.2% Foliar<br />
spray <strong>of</strong> ZnSO 4 (Knee-high and Tasseling<br />
stages)<br />
RDF + FYM (25 t ha -1 ) + 0.2% Foliar spray <strong>of</strong><br />
ZnSO 4 (Knee-high and Tasseling stages)<br />
RDF +Seed pelleting + 0.2% Foliar spray <strong>of</strong><br />
ZnSO 4 (Knee-high and Tasseling stages)<br />
RDF + FYM enrichment with 50 kg ZnSO 4 ha -1<br />
+ 0.2% Foliar spray <strong>of</strong> ZnSO 4 (Knee-high and<br />
Tasseling stages)<br />
4.8 5.27 11.67 12.87<br />
4.8 6.20 13.60 14.67<br />
4.67 5.47 11.93 14.07<br />
4.8 5.60 12.67 13.67<br />
4.87 5.93 13.27 14.33<br />
SEm± 0.2 0.23 0.46 0.42<br />
CD (p=0.05) NS 0.70 1.38 1.27<br />
Plant height (cm) as influenced by integrated approach for zinc enrichment in rainfed maize.<br />
Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming,<br />
INM, soil-microorganisms-plant interactions<br />
475 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
T4-16P-162841<br />
Influence <strong>of</strong> Integrated Nutrient Management on Soil Properties, Crop Yields<br />
and Water Use Efficiency in Rainfed Maize-Wheat Rotation<br />
Mohammad Amin Bhat, M.J. Singh, Anil Khokhar, Abrar Yousuf,<br />
Parminder Singh Sandhu and Balwinder Singh Dhillon<br />
Regional Research Station, Punjab Agricultural University, Ballowal Saunkhri, SBS Nagar, Punjab-<br />
144521<br />
Nutrient management is imperative to increase productivity <strong>of</strong> maize-wheat system, a prominent<br />
multiple cropping system operational in dryland areas <strong>of</strong> the northwest India. The productivity <strong>of</strong><br />
maize and wheat not only depends on adequate nutrition but also the appropriate nutrient<br />
management approaches. Nevertheless, the farming systems practiced in India are exploitative in<br />
character making it difficult to maintain soil fertility and affecting long-term viability <strong>of</strong><br />
agriculture (Ghosh et al 2021). Nitrogen is the essential element, the deficiency <strong>of</strong> which restricts<br />
crop production. Chemical fertilizers are the predominant source <strong>of</strong> nitrogen in agricultural<br />
production systems. No doubt, inorganic fertilization substantially augments crop yield; but, the<br />
supply <strong>of</strong> nutrients solely through synthetic fertilizers does not fulfill the complete nutrient<br />
demand <strong>of</strong> the crops (Khokhar et al 2022). The sustained and prudent use <strong>of</strong> manures improves<br />
physico-chemical characteristics <strong>of</strong> all soils, especially those having shallow pr<strong>of</strong>ile depth,<br />
coarse-texture and lower content <strong>of</strong> organic matter, and reduces the risk <strong>of</strong> soil and water quality<br />
degradation (Amoah et al 2012). The regular addition <strong>of</strong> organic manures is frequently<br />
recommended in India to maintain soil fertility, although its usage is rapidly declining due to<br />
farm mechanization, greater use <strong>of</strong> inorganic fertilizers, and a reduction in the size <strong>of</strong> livestock.<br />
However, the commercial fertilizers are becoming increasingly expensive, therefore, organic<br />
manures, like FYM, continue to be an appropriate substitute to commercial fertilizers. Therefore,<br />
this study was intended to evaluate the effect <strong>of</strong> INM on soil properties, crop yields and water<br />
use efficiency under rainfed conditions.<br />
Methodology<br />
The study was conducted in an on-going 5-year-old experiment started in 2017 at Regional<br />
Research Station, Punjab Agricultural University, Ballowal Saunkhri. The study area lies in<br />
subhumid subtropical climate having hot summers and cold winters. The experiment on maizewheat<br />
system has a combination <strong>of</strong> FYM and fertilizer treatments. The plots, 43.2m 2 (5.4m ×<br />
8m) in size, were replicated thrice in randomized complete block design (RCBD). The treatments<br />
<strong>of</strong> synthetic fertilizers and FYM compared. Farmyard manure was incorporated into the soil<br />
476 | Page Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming, INM, soilmicroorganisms-plant<br />
interactions
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
before the sowing <strong>of</strong> maize and wheat as per the treatments. The sources <strong>of</strong> N, P and K were<br />
urea, single superphosphate and diammonium phosphate and muriate <strong>of</strong> potash. Maize (PMH 13)<br />
and wheat (PBW 660) were grown in monsoon (July to September) and winter season<br />
(November to April), respectively. One half <strong>of</strong> N was applied at the time <strong>of</strong> sowing and<br />
remaining half at knee high stage in maize and crown root initiation stage in wheat. Other<br />
recommended cultural practices for both the crops were followed throughout the study.<br />
Results<br />
The yield <strong>of</strong> maize increased with nutrient management treatments as compared to control.<br />
Significantly higher grain yield <strong>of</strong> maize (3711 kg ha˗1 ) was recorded with 100% NPK + FYM<br />
10 t ha˗1 as compared to control, N (100% RDF) and NP (100% RDF) but was statistically at par<br />
with all other treatments. The higher water use efficiency (6.25 kg ha˗1 mm˗1 ) was also recorded<br />
in the treatment 100% NPK + FYM 10 t ha˗1 as compared to other treatments. In wheat,<br />
significantly higher grain yield was recorded with 100% NPK + FYM 10 t ha˗1 as compared to<br />
control, N (100% RDF), 100%N through FYM and 100%N through FYM+ bi<strong>of</strong>ertilizers but was<br />
statistically at par with all other treatments. The highest water use efficiency was also recorded in<br />
the treatment 100% NPK + FYM 10 t ha. Soil moisture exhibited significant variation among the<br />
treatments. The FYM substituted plots, by and large, had significantly higher soil moisture than<br />
sole chemical fertilized and control treatments. Organic carbon exhibited significant variation<br />
among different treatments and highest OC was recorded in NPK (100%RDF) + FYM10 t ha˗1 as<br />
compared to all other treatments.<br />
Effect <strong>of</strong> integrated nutrient management on yield and water use efficiency <strong>of</strong> rainfed<br />
Treatments<br />
maize-wheat system<br />
Grain<br />
yield<br />
(kg/ha)<br />
Maize Wheat Soil properties<br />
WUE<br />
(kg/hamm)<br />
Grain yield<br />
(kg/ha)<br />
WUE<br />
(kg/hamm)<br />
Soil<br />
moisture<br />
(%)<br />
Control 1370 d 2.31 d 1883 d 9.49 e 11.46 c 0.41 c<br />
N(100% RDF) 2141 cd 3.60 cd 3017 bc 15.40 cd 11.51 c 0.42 bc<br />
NP(100%RDF) 2244 bcd 3.78 bcd 3258 abc 16.62 bcd 11.58 c 0.48 abc<br />
NPK(100%RDF)(DAP) 3065 abc 5.16 abc 4050 ab 20.70 abc 12.39 bc 0.48 abc<br />
NPK(100%RDF)+S(SSP) 3101 abc 5.22 abc 3792 ab 19.36 abc 11.78 c 0.48 abc<br />
NPK(100% RDF)+ZnSO 4 3246 ab 5.47 ab 4267 a 21.76 ab 11.38 c 0.51 ab<br />
NPK(50%RDF)+FYM10t/ha 3215 ab 5.41 ab 3492 abc 18.27 abcd 13.41 ab 0.52 a<br />
NPK(100%RDF)+FYM10t/ha 3711 a 6.25 a 4292 a 22.46 a 14.51 a 0.56 a<br />
NPK(150%RDF) 3305 ab 5.56 ab 3683 ab 19.08 abcd 12.30 bc 0.55 a<br />
SOC<br />
(%)<br />
Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming,<br />
INM, soil-microorganisms-plant interactions<br />
477 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
100%N Through FYM 2733 abc 4.60 abc 2550 cd 13.46 de 12.51 bc 0.52 a<br />
100%N Through FYM +Bi<strong>of</strong>ertilizers 2828 abc 4.76 abc 2950 bcd 15.77 cd 12.97 abc 0.53 a<br />
Conclusion<br />
Integrated nutrient management enhanced crop yield, water use efficiency and improves soil<br />
properties under maize-wheat cropping system.<br />
References<br />
Amoah, A.A., Senge, M., Miyagawa, S. and Itou, K. 2012. Effects <strong>of</strong> soil fertility management<br />
on growth, yield, and water-use efficiency <strong>of</strong> maize (Zea mays L.) and selected soil<br />
properties. Comm. in Soil Sci. and Plant Analysis. 43(6): 924–935.<br />
Ghosh, D., Mandal, M. and Pattanayak, S.K. 2021. Long-term effect <strong>of</strong> integrated nutrient<br />
management on dynamics <strong>of</strong> phosphorous in an acid Inceptisols <strong>of</strong> tropical India.<br />
Communi. Soil Sci. Plant Anal., DOI: 10.1080/00103624.2021.1924186<br />
Khokhar, A., Bhat, M.A., Singh, M.J., Yousuf, A., Sharma, V. and Sandhu, P.S. 2022. Soil<br />
properties, nutrient availability vis-à-vis uptake and productivity <strong>of</strong> rainfed maize-wheat<br />
system in response to long-term tillage and n management in northwest India. Communic.<br />
Soil Sci. Plant Anal., 53(22): 2935-2954<br />
T4-17P-1085<br />
Effect <strong>of</strong> Mulching and Integrated Nutrient Management on Growth <strong>of</strong> Kharif<br />
Maize under Dryland Condition<br />
Sudhanshu Verma*, Sudhir Kr. Rajpoot, S. K. Verma and J. P. Singh<br />
Department <strong>of</strong> Agronomy, Institute <strong>of</strong> Agricultural Sciences, Banaras Hindu University,<br />
Varanasi- 221 005<br />
*sudhanshubcn@gmail.com<br />
Maize is one <strong>of</strong> the most versatile crops and has the highest genetic yield potential and known as<br />
the queen <strong>of</strong> cereals in the world. Maize is considered the third most important food crop among<br />
the cereals in India that contributed to nearly 9% <strong>of</strong> the national food security. Maize is a<br />
staplefood, and quality feed, and used as a basic raw material for thousands <strong>of</strong> industrial<br />
products. The average productivity in India is 2.43 t ha -1 . The productivity <strong>of</strong> maize is limited<br />
due to moisture stress and this could be achieved by soil and nutrient management practices as<br />
these are <strong>of</strong> paramount concern to conserve soil moisture and improve productivity and fertility.<br />
478 | Page Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming, INM, soilmicroorganisms-plant<br />
interactions
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Mulch particularly restricts the transport <strong>of</strong> water vapor from the soil surface to the<br />
microclimate, which diminishesthe direct evaporation loss <strong>of</strong> water and increases the availability<br />
<strong>of</strong> soil water to the crops and resulting inthe regulation <strong>of</strong> soil temperature. The residues <strong>of</strong><br />
mulches such as jowar or bajra stubbles, paddy straw or husk, saw dust, etc. left on the soil<br />
eliminate soil loss by preventing water and wind erosion and improvingthe chemical, physical<br />
and biological properties <strong>of</strong> soil.<br />
Maize being a heavy feeder requires much more nutrients compared to other crops and in order<br />
to meet those nutritional requirements the farmers apply large quantities <strong>of</strong> inorganic fertilizers<br />
without understanding its negative impact onthe fertility status <strong>of</strong> the soil as well as the<br />
environment. The supplementary and complementary use <strong>of</strong> organic manures, viz. farm yard<br />
manure, poultry manure, vermicompost, castor cake, and inorganic fertilizers plays an important<br />
role in the growth and yield <strong>of</strong> the crop and enhances the soil health<br />
Methodology<br />
Afield experiment was conducted during the Kharifseason<strong>of</strong> 2017 at the Agricultural Research<br />
Farm <strong>of</strong> the Institute <strong>of</strong> Agricultural Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi. The<br />
experiment was laid out in a split-plot design, keeping mulching treatments asmain plots and<br />
integrated nutrient management treatments assubplots, with 3 replications. The treatment were:<br />
M1: control (no mulch), M2: dust mulch, and M3: rice straw mulch. The subplot treatments were:<br />
S1:100% RDF, S2:75% RDF + 25 % N through poultry manure, S3: 100% RDF + 25 % N<br />
through poultry manure, S4: 75% RDF + 25 % N through FYM and S5: 100% RDF + 25 % N<br />
through FYM where RDF is 120: 60: 60 kg N: P2O5: K2O ha -1 respectively. The maizecultivar<br />
‘K-99’ was chosen for the experiment. Well rotten poultry manure and FYM were taken from<br />
IFS (integrated farming system) and their chemical status. Observations on growth parameters <strong>of</strong><br />
maize were recorded and their significance was tested by the variance ratio (~F-value) at a 5%<br />
level. Treatment means were compared using critical differences (CD) at the 5% level <strong>of</strong><br />
significance. Relative economics was calculated as per the prevailing market prices <strong>of</strong> the inputs<br />
and produce during the years <strong>of</strong> experimentation.<br />
Results<br />
Mulching and integrated nutrient management showed significant variation ingrowth parameters<br />
<strong>of</strong> maize. Maximum mean number <strong>of</strong> leaves, plant height, leaf area index and chlorophyll<br />
content were recorded under dust mulch, which was statistically at par with rice straw mulch and<br />
significantly superior over control (no mulch), respectively. Similar results also found by Rajput<br />
et al. (2014). Integrated nutrient management practices had significant influence on number <strong>of</strong><br />
Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming,<br />
INM, soil-microorganisms-plant interactions<br />
479 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
leaves, plant height, leaf area index and chlorophyll content. Application <strong>of</strong> 100% RDF + 25 %<br />
N through poultry manure was recorded significantly number <strong>of</strong> leaves, plant height, leaf area<br />
index, and chlorophyll content over 75% RDF + 25 % N through poultry manure, 75% RDF + 25<br />
% N through FYM, 100% RDF and it were statistically at par with 100% RDF + 25 % N through<br />
FYM, respectively. The interaction effect between mulching and integrated nutrient management<br />
treatments on number <strong>of</strong> leaves, plant height, leaf area index and chlorophyll content were found<br />
to be non-significant. Similar findings were also reported by Iqbal et al. (2014), who observed<br />
that application <strong>of</strong> application <strong>of</strong> 75 % N from urea + 25 % N from poultry manure recorded<br />
significantly highest plant height and number <strong>of</strong> leaves per plant observed.<br />
Conclusion<br />
Based on the experimentation, it can be concluded that mulching and integrated nutrient<br />
management treatments had pronounced effect on growth <strong>of</strong> Kharifmaize. Dust mulch<br />
application produced the highest growth traits. Application <strong>of</strong> 100% RDF + 25 % N through<br />
poultry manure practice proved to be higher growth than other recommended dose <strong>of</strong> fertilizers.<br />
References<br />
Iqbal, A., Iqbal, M. A., Raza, A., Akbar, N., Abbas, R.N., Khan, H.Z. 2014. Integrated nitrogen<br />
management studies in forage maize. Am. Eurasian J. Agric. Environ. Sci.,14(8):744-747.<br />
Rajput, B. S., Maurya, S. K., Singh, R. N., Sen, A., Singh, R. K. 2014. Effect <strong>of</strong> different types<br />
<strong>of</strong> mulch on maize under guava (Psidium guajava) based agri-horti system. Online Int<br />
Interdiscip. Res. J, 4(3): 122-130.<br />
Effect <strong>of</strong> mulching and integrated nutrient management on growth <strong>of</strong> kharif maize<br />
Treatment<br />
Number<br />
<strong>of</strong> leaves<br />
Mulching<br />
Plant<br />
height<br />
(cm)<br />
Leaf<br />
area<br />
index at<br />
75 DAS<br />
Chlorophyll<br />
content at 75<br />
DAS<br />
(spad value)<br />
M1 : Control (No mulch) 7.54 190.0 3.72 39.7<br />
M2 : Dust mulch 9.53 216.0 4.27 45.2<br />
M3 : Rice straw mulch 8.97 206.1 4.16 42.2<br />
SEm± 0.38 4.8 0.10 1.0<br />
CD (p=0.05) 1.48 18.9 0.41 3.8<br />
480 | Page Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming, INM, soilmicroorganisms-plant<br />
interactions
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Integrated nutrient management<br />
S1:100% RDF 7.89 193.4 3.77 38.5<br />
S2:75% RDF + 25 % N through Poultry<br />
manure<br />
S3: 100% RDF + 25 % N through Poultry<br />
manure<br />
8.62 201.8 4.10 42.3<br />
9.50 217.3 4.38 46.5<br />
S4: 75% RDF + 25 % N through FYM 8.16 195.4 3.84 40.0<br />
S5: 100% RDF + 25 % N through FYM 9.23 212.0 4.17 44.6<br />
SEm± 0.27 5.8 0.11 1.0<br />
CD (p=0.05) 0.80 17.0 0.33 2.8<br />
T4-18P-1089<br />
Yield Maximization <strong>of</strong> Indian Mustard (Brassica juncea) through Integrated<br />
Nutrient Management under Dryland Condition<br />
S. K. Sharma*, Kuldeep Singh, S. K. Thakral and Parveen Kumar<br />
Department <strong>of</strong> Agronomy, Chaudhary Charan Singh Haryana Agricultural University,<br />
Hisar 125004, Haryana, India<br />
*sksharma67@rediffmail.com<br />
Oilseeds are the second largest agricultural commodity after cereals in India. The mustard<br />
crop is the second most important edible oilseed crop in India after groundnut and accounts<br />
for nearly one-third <strong>of</strong> the oil produced in the country. Imbalanced nutrition is one <strong>of</strong> the<br />
important constraints towards higher mustard productivity. Hence, in order to improve crop<br />
productivity, and soil health and lessen the negative environmental impact integrated<br />
nutrient management (INM) is a viable agronomic option. The crop’s yield potential can be<br />
maximized by balanced and efficient use <strong>of</strong> organic and inorganic sources <strong>of</strong> nutrients.<br />
Therefore, the study was undertaken to find out the effect <strong>of</strong> various integrated nutrient<br />
management practices on the yield and economics <strong>of</strong> Indian mustard.<br />
Methodology<br />
A field experiment was conducted at Dryland Agriculture Research Farm <strong>of</strong> the Chaudhary<br />
Charan Singh Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar during the Rabi season <strong>of</strong> 2020-21. The<br />
experiment was laid out in a randomized block design with three replications. The treatments<br />
comprised <strong>of</strong> T1-control, T2-40:20 kg NP/ha (RDF), T3-50:25 kg NP/ha, T4-60:30 kg NP/ha, T5-<br />
40:20:10 kg NPK/ha, T6-50:25:12.5 kg NPK/ha, T7-60:30:15 kg NPK/ha, T8-20:20 kg NP/ha<br />
Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming,<br />
INM, soil-microorganisms-plant interactions<br />
481 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
(inorganic) + 20 kg N/ha (FYM), T9-25:25 kg NP/ha (inorganic) + 25 kg N/ha (FYM), T10-<br />
30:30 kg NP/ha (inorganic) + 30 kg N/ha (FYM), T11-20:20:10 kg NPK/ha (inorganic) + 20 kg<br />
N/ha (FYM), T12-25:25:12.5 kg NPK/ha (inorganic) + 25 kg N/ha (FYM) and T13-30:30:15 kg<br />
NPK/ha (inorganic) + 30 kg N/ha (FYM). Soil <strong>of</strong> the experimental field was sandy loam and<br />
having low organic carbon (0.16%), low available N (112 kg/ha), medium available P (17.0<br />
kg/ha) and high available K (436 kg/ha) with a pH <strong>of</strong> 7.8. Indian mustard variety ‘RH 725’ was<br />
sown on 23 October 2020 and harvested on 22 March 2021. The row spacing was 45 cm keeping<br />
a 5 kg seed rate/ha. Total rainfall <strong>of</strong> 38.4 mm was received during the crop growth period. The<br />
other agronomic practices were followed as per production recommendations during the crop<br />
growth period. All the fertilizers in the form <strong>of</strong> Urea, SSP and FYM were applied at the time <strong>of</strong><br />
sowing the crop.<br />
Results<br />
Different nutrient management treatments had higher growth and yield attributes <strong>of</strong> Indian<br />
mustard over control. Application <strong>of</strong> 30:30:15 kg NPK/ha (inorganic) + 30 kg N/ha (FYM)<br />
recorded significantly higher plant height, number <strong>of</strong> primary branches per plant, and siliquae<br />
per plant over the rest <strong>of</strong> treatments and were at par with application <strong>of</strong> 25:25:12.5 kg NPK/ha<br />
(inorganic) + 25 kg N/ha (FYM), 30:30 kg NP/ha (inorganic) + 30 kg N/ha (FYM) and 60:30:15<br />
kg NPK/ha treatments. Application <strong>of</strong> 30:30:15 kg NPK/ha (inorganic) + 30 kg N/ha (FYM)<br />
recorded significantly higher seed yield (3161 kg/ha) and stover yield (7901 kg/ha) <strong>of</strong> mustard<br />
compared to other treatments except treatment receiving 25:25:12.5 kg NPK/ha (inorganic) + 25<br />
kg N/ha (FYM), 30:30 kg NP/ha (inorganic) + 30 kg N/ha (FYM), 25:25 kg NP/ha (inorganic) +<br />
25 kg N/ha (FYM) and 60:30:15 kg NPK/ha. Varma et al. (2021) also found that integrated<br />
nutrient management improved the yield attributes and yield <strong>of</strong> Indian mustard. Higher net<br />
returns <strong>of</strong> ₹ 117353/ha were also recorded with the application <strong>of</strong> 30:30:15 kg NPK/ha<br />
(inorganic) + 30 kg N/ha (FYM). However, the highest BC ratio (4.62) was observed with the<br />
application <strong>of</strong> 60:30:15 kg NPK/ha (inorganic).<br />
Conclusion<br />
Application <strong>of</strong> 30:30:15 kg NPK/ha (inorganic) + 30 kg N/ha (FYM) resulted in significantly<br />
higher yield attributes and yield <strong>of</strong> Indian mustard. Similarly, higher net returns were also<br />
recorded with the application <strong>of</strong> 30:30:15 kg NPK/ha (inorganic) + 30 kg N/ha (FYM) under<br />
sandy loam soils in arid/semi-arid regions. The highest BC ratio was observed with the<br />
application <strong>of</strong> 60:30:15 kg NPK/ha (inorganic).<br />
482 | Page Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming, INM, soilmicroorganisms-plant<br />
interactions
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
References<br />
Varma, G. R., Satish, P., Hussain, S. A. and Sharma, H. K. 2021. Effect <strong>of</strong> integrated nutrient<br />
Treatments<br />
management on productivity and economics <strong>of</strong> Indian mustard (Brassica juncea). Int. J.<br />
Environ. Clim. 11(6): 169-176.<br />
Effect <strong>of</strong> treatments on crop yield and economics <strong>of</strong> Indian mustard<br />
Seed<br />
yield<br />
(kg/ha)<br />
Stover<br />
yield<br />
(kg/ha)<br />
Gross<br />
returns<br />
(₹/ha)<br />
Net<br />
returns<br />
(₹/ha)<br />
Control 2313 5981 110545 82145 3.89<br />
40:20 kg NP/ha (RDF) 2756 7115 131712 101937 4.42<br />
50:25 kg NP/ha 2819 7362 134765 104646 4.47<br />
60:30 kg NP/ha 2937 7560 140351 109889 4.61<br />
40:20:10 kg NPK/ha 2828 7241 135123 105033 4.49<br />
50:25:12.5 kg NPK/ha 2905 7512 138839 108326 4.55<br />
60:30:15 kg NPK/ha 2992 7668 142962 112026 4.62<br />
20:20 kg NP/ha (inorganic) + 20 kg N/ha (FYM) 2907 7362 138857 107316 4.40<br />
25:25 kg NP/ha (inorganic) + 25 kg N/ha (FYM) 2991 7641 142902 110577 4.42<br />
30:30 kg NP/ha (inorganic) + 30 kg N/ha (FYM) 3104 7986 148329 115219 4.48<br />
20:20:10 kg NPK/ha (inorganic) + 20 kg N/ha (FYM) 2962 7442 141454 109598 4.44<br />
25:25:12.5 kg NPK/ha (inorganic) + 25 kg N/ha (FYM) 3052 7750 145793 113073 4.46<br />
30:30:15 kg NPK/ha (inorganic) + 30 kg N/ha (FYM) 3161 7901 150937 117353 4.49<br />
CD at 5% 174 388<br />
BC<br />
ratio<br />
T4-19P-1093<br />
Quality and Leaf Nutrient <strong>of</strong> Pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) Influenced<br />
by Integrated Nutrient Management<br />
Bhagyaresha R. Gajbhiye and H. K. Kausadikar<br />
AICRP on Long Term Fertilizer Experiment<br />
Department <strong>of</strong> Soil Science and Agricultural Chemistry,<br />
Vasantrao Naik Marathwada Krishi Vidyapeeth, Parbhani (M.S.)-431402, India<br />
The fruit, pomegranate (Punica granatum L) contains nearly about 153 phytochemicals like<br />
ellagic acid, catechin and procyandins, fatty acids and triglycerides, sterols and terpenoids,<br />
flavonols etc. The fruit juice contains tannins, anthocyanin, polyphenols and antioxidants A, E<br />
and C which play major role in maintenance <strong>of</strong> heart blood vessels and proper blood circulation.<br />
Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming,<br />
INM, soil-microorganisms-plant interactions<br />
483 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
The integrated nutrient management infuses long term sustainability in the productivity level<br />
because <strong>of</strong> availability <strong>of</strong> nutrients in soil for next season crop. Incorporation <strong>of</strong> organic<br />
fertilizers is a common practice to improve the yield <strong>of</strong> many fruit crops. It also limits chemical<br />
intervention and finally minimizes the negative impact on the wider environment. The present<br />
fruit production in India meets only the 46 percent <strong>of</strong> the total demand. Thus there is a strong<br />
need to increase the production and productivity through crop diversification and use <strong>of</strong> best<br />
horticultural techniques among which Integrated Nutrient Management (INM) is the one.<br />
Therefore, the present investigation is planned with the objectives; to study the effect <strong>of</strong> INM<br />
practices on quality and temporal behaviour <strong>of</strong> pomegranate in respect <strong>of</strong> nutrient uptake.<br />
Methodology<br />
The total soluble solids were determined with the help <strong>of</strong> digital refractometer and values were<br />
corrected to 20 0 C with the help <strong>of</strong> temperature correction chart (A.O.A.C., 1975). The titrable<br />
acidity was calculated on the basis <strong>of</strong> one ml NaOH equivalent to 0.0067 g <strong>of</strong> anhydrous malic<br />
acid and the results were expressed as per cent acidity as per the method outlined in A.O.A.C<br />
(1980). Colour <strong>of</strong> pomegranate juice was determined by Hunter Colour EZ Flex by extraction <strong>of</strong><br />
juice using juice grinder and expressed in dimensions <strong>of</strong> L*, a* and b* values (Aaby et al.,<br />
2005). L*, a* and b* uniform colour space, L* indicates luminosity or lightness, a* chromacity<br />
on a green (-) to red (+) axis and b* chromacity on a blue (-) to yellow (+) axis. For estimation <strong>of</strong><br />
macro and micronutrients status <strong>of</strong> foliage, fifty fully mature and expanded current seasons<br />
leaves located at the 8 th position from the apex were collected all round the periphery <strong>of</strong> the plant<br />
as recommended by Bhargava and Dhander (1987).<br />
estimation <strong>of</strong> different plant nutrients.<br />
Results<br />
The standard methods adopted for<br />
Pooled data showed that the maximum total soluble sugar (13.45 0 Brix) was recorded with INM:<br />
FYM + Solubilizers + RDF +Umber (Ficus racemosa) Rhizosphere Hybridized Soil and found<br />
to be statistically at par with INM: FYM + solubilizers + RDF +Antibiotics and Antibiotics<br />
(Streptocycline) + RDF recording 12.75 and 12.69 0 Brix, respectively. The minimum<br />
(10.23 0 Brix) total soluble sugar was recorded at Absolute control.<br />
Titrable acidity <strong>of</strong> pomegranate fruit was significantly decreased with the application <strong>of</strong> different<br />
organic and inorganic sources through different treatments in both the years <strong>of</strong> study. The lowest<br />
amount <strong>of</strong> titrable acidity (0.28%) was noted with the application <strong>of</strong> INM (FYM + Solubilizers +<br />
RDF) +Umber (Ficus racemosa) Rhizosphere Hybridized Soil.<br />
484 | Page Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming, INM, soilmicroorganisms-plant<br />
interactions
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
The L*, b* and h* values <strong>of</strong> pomegranate colour were found to decrease while, a* and c* values<br />
increased with different nutrient management practices. The L*, b* and h* values decreased i.e.<br />
77.35, 2.33 and 24.42 significantly with the application <strong>of</strong> INM (FYM + Solubilizers + RDF)<br />
+Umber (Ficus racemosa) Rhizosphere Hybridized Soil over control and followed by INM<br />
(FYM + Solubilizers +RDF) +Antibiotics with values 80.01, 2.64 and 26.21, respectively.<br />
However, a* and c* values were increased to 13.91 and 10.40 with treatment T7 followed by<br />
treatments T6 with values 12.43and 9.96, respectively.<br />
Leaf nitrogen (2.47 and 2.53 %), phosphorus (0.26 and 0.28 %) and potassium concentration<br />
(1.33 and 1.34 %) were increased with INM (FYM + Solubilizers+ RDF) + Umber (Ficus<br />
racemosa) Rhizosphere Hybridised Soil which was statistically at par with INM (FYM +<br />
Solubilizers + RDF) + Antibiotics and Antibiotics (Streptocycline) + RDF) at flowering and after<br />
harvest, respectively. While, it was decreased with absolute control.<br />
Conclusion<br />
Yield <strong>of</strong> pomegranate and quality parameters (TSS, titrable acidity and colour <strong>of</strong> juice) were<br />
improved with application <strong>of</strong> INM (FYM @ 15 kg per tree, Azotobacter @ 8 ml per tree, PSB @<br />
8 ml per tree and Trichoderma @ 100 g per tree, 625:250:250 g N, P2O5 and K2O per tree) along<br />
with Umber (Ficus racemosa) Rhizosphere Hybridised Soil (URHS) @ 25 kg per tree.<br />
Pomegranate leaf nutrient concentration like total N, P and K were also increased with same<br />
treatment.<br />
References<br />
A.O. A. C. 1975. Official Methods <strong>of</strong> analysis. Association <strong>of</strong> Official Analytical Chemist. 12 th<br />
edition, Washington D. C.<br />
A. O. A. C. 1980 Official methods <strong>of</strong> analysis <strong>of</strong> the analytical chemists, 13 th ed. (W. Horwitz,<br />
ed). Association <strong>of</strong> Official Analytical Chemists 83: 617-623.<br />
Aaby, K., Skrede, G. and Wrolstand, R. E. 2005. Phenolic composition and antioxidants<br />
activities in flesh and achenes <strong>of</strong> strawberries (Frageria ananassa). Journal <strong>of</strong><br />
Agricultural Food Chemistry 53: 4032-4040.<br />
Bhargava, B. S. and Dhandar, D. S. 1987. Leaf sampling technique in pomegranate. Progressive<br />
Horticulture. 19 (3/4): 196-99.<br />
Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming,<br />
INM, soil-microorganisms-plant interactions<br />
485 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Effect <strong>of</strong> Integrated Nutrient Management on total soluble suga (TSS) and titrable acidity<br />
<strong>of</strong> pomegranate juice<br />
Treatments TSS ( 0 Brix) Titrable acidity (%)<br />
Pooled<br />
Pooled<br />
Absolute Control 10.23 0.48<br />
Farmer’s practices (1/2 RDF) 10.42 0.45<br />
RDF (625:250:250 g N P 2O 5, K 2O tree -1 ) 11.00 0.43<br />
INM (FYM + Solubilizers+ RDF) 11.61 0.40<br />
RDF + Antibiotics (Streptocycline) 12.69 0.32<br />
T 4 + Antibiotics 12.75 0.31<br />
T 4 + Umber (Ficus racemosa) Rhizosphere<br />
Hybridised Soil (URHS) 13.45 0.28<br />
Average 11.74 0.38<br />
S.Em.± 0.34 0.03<br />
CD at 5% 0.97 0.09<br />
Total N. P and K<br />
concentration<br />
Total N, P and K concentration (%)<br />
6<br />
4<br />
2<br />
0<br />
Category Category 1 Category 2 Category 3 4<br />
Treatments<br />
Series 1<br />
Series 2<br />
Series 3<br />
Effect <strong>of</strong> INM on leaf N, P and K content <strong>of</strong> Pomegranate<br />
486 | Page Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming, INM, soilmicroorganisms-plant<br />
interactions
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
T4-20P-1094<br />
Effect <strong>of</strong> Long Term Fertilization on Yield and Chemical Properties <strong>of</strong> Soil in<br />
Soybean-Safflower Croping Sequence in dryland condition under Vertisol<br />
Bhagyaresha R. Gajbhiye and Ramprasad N. Khandare<br />
AICRP on Long Term Fertilizer Experiment<br />
Department <strong>of</strong> Soil Science and Agricultural Chemistry Vasantrao Naik Marathwada Krishi Vidyapeeth,<br />
Parbhani (M. S.)-431402, India<br />
Long term experiments are the primary source <strong>of</strong> information to determine the effect <strong>of</strong> cropping<br />
systems or sequences, soil management, fertilizer use and residue utilization on changes in<br />
organic carbon (Leigh and Johnston, 1994). These are usually the only sources <strong>of</strong> information to<br />
determine agricultural sustainability. Soyabean has become an important oilseed crop in India in<br />
a very short period with 113.98 lakh ha area under its cultivation during kharif 2019-20. The<br />
major soyabean growing states are Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra, Rajasthan, Karnataka, and<br />
Telangana. Safflower (Carthamus tinctorius), another important oilseed crop <strong>of</strong> India, is<br />
cultivated in the winter (rabi) season from September /October to February /March. India<br />
accounts for 41% (0.3 Mha) <strong>of</strong> world area under safflower. Because <strong>of</strong> low yield (630 kg ha -1 ),<br />
safflower production <strong>of</strong> merely 0.19 Mha is only 29% <strong>of</strong> global production followed by that in<br />
the US (17%), Argentina (13%), and Kazakhastan (12%).<br />
Methodology<br />
Composite soil samples <strong>of</strong> 0-15 cm depths were collected from individual plots after harvesting<br />
<strong>of</strong> the crop. The collected soil samples were thoroughly mixed and brought to the laboratory, air<br />
dried, ground with wooden mortar and pestle and sieved through 2 mm sieve, for analyzing<br />
organic carbon, available N, P and K. Organic carbon was assessed by Walkey and Black’s rapid<br />
titration method as suggested by Piper (1966). Available nitrogen was determined by using<br />
alkaline potassium permanganate method suggested by Subbiah and Asija (1956). Available<br />
phosphorus was determined by using 0.5 M sodium bicarbonate (pH 8.5) as an extractant and<br />
measured spectrophotometrically by using 420 nm wave lengths as outlined by Olsen et al.<br />
(1954). Available potassium was estimated by using normal neutral ammonium acetate as an<br />
extractant and extractant was subscribed to Flame photometer Jackson (1973).<br />
Results<br />
The results indicated that treatment 100% NPK + FYM @ 5 t ha -1 recorded highest grain (14.17<br />
and 6.31q ha -1 ) and straw yield (30.02 and 34.44 q ha -1 ) <strong>of</strong> soybean and safflower, respectively<br />
Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming,<br />
INM, soil-microorganisms-plant interactions<br />
487 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
which was found significantly superior over all the treatments and statistically at par with 100%<br />
NPK, 150% NPK, 100% NPK+HW, 100% NPK+ Zn and 100% NPK -S. The lowest grain and<br />
straw yield were recorded in absolute control followed by 100% N alone treatment in both crops.<br />
The highest soil organic carbon (7.04 g ha -1 ) was noticed in the treatment receiving 100% NPK<br />
along with 5-ton FYM over the control. However, the lowest organic content was with absolute<br />
control (5.51 g ha -1 ) followed by fallow (5.65 g ha -1 ). Maximum available N, P and K were<br />
recorded in 100% NPK + FYM @ 5 t ha -1 (282.28, 19.39 and 800.14 kg ha -1 , respectively) and<br />
was comparable with 150% NPK. Whereas, the lowest available N, P and K were recorded in<br />
absolute control followed by fallow.<br />
Conclusion<br />
Application <strong>of</strong> 100% NPK + FYM @ 5tha -1 recorded highest grain and straw yield <strong>of</strong> both<br />
soybean and safflower crops in soybean-safflower cropping sequence. After harvest <strong>of</strong> crop,<br />
treatment wise soil samples were analysed and it was found that organic carbon, available N, P<br />
and K were recorded maximum in 100% NPK + FYM @ 5 t ha -1 .<br />
References<br />
Jackson, M.L. 1973. Soil Chemical Analysis. Prentice, Hall <strong>of</strong> Indian Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi. 498.<br />
Leigh, R. A. and Johnston, A. E. 1994. Long-term Experiment in Agricultural and Ecological<br />
Sciences. CAB International. Wallingford. U.K. 428.<br />
Olsen, S.R., Cole, C.V., Watanabe, F.S. and Dean, L.A. 1954. Estimation <strong>of</strong> available<br />
phosphorus in soil by extraction with sodium bicarbonate. U. S. department <strong>of</strong><br />
Agriculture Circular. 939.<br />
Subbiah, B.V. and Asija, G.L. 1956. A rapid procedure for the estimation <strong>of</strong> Available Nitrogen<br />
in Soil. Curr. Sci., 25:259-260.<br />
Walkley, A.J. and Black, I.A. 1934. Estimation <strong>of</strong> soil organic carbon by chromic acid titration<br />
method. Soil Sci., 37: 29-38.<br />
488 | Page Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming, INM, soilmicroorganisms-plant<br />
interactions
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Effect <strong>of</strong> long term fertilization on chemical properties <strong>of</strong> soil in soybean-safflower croping<br />
sequence<br />
Treatment No.<br />
OC<br />
(g kg -1 )<br />
Available N<br />
(Kg ha -1 )<br />
Available P<br />
(Kg ha -1 )<br />
Available K<br />
(Kg ha -1 )<br />
50% NPK 6.39 245.20 15.79 650.71<br />
100% NPK 6.62 255.00 17.31 697.97<br />
150% NPK 6.74 268.15 19.04 757.38<br />
100% NPK+HW 6.64 256.49 17.53 671.53<br />
100% NPK+Zn 6.57 261.03 17.57 697.49<br />
100% NP 5.79 242.51 16.52 667.87<br />
100% N 5.74 241.03 10.98 634.46<br />
100% NPK+FYM @ 5 t ha -1 7.04 282.28 19.39 800.14<br />
100% NPK-Sulphur 6.23 250.13 16.36 670.07<br />
Only FYM @ 10t ha -1 6.80 260.25 17.71 747.17<br />
Absolute Control 5.51 227.33 10.35 622.55<br />
Fallow<br />
5.65 234.60 15.62 647.37<br />
S.E. ± 0.28 7.31 0.68 25.99<br />
C.D. at 5% 0.81 21.06 1.95 74.82<br />
Initial 5.50 216.00 16.00 766.00<br />
T4-21P-1098<br />
Effect <strong>of</strong> Foliar Application <strong>of</strong> DAP on Yield, Quality and Nutrient Uptake <strong>of</strong><br />
chickpea Under Dryland Conditions<br />
I. R. Bagwan*, Archana B. Pawar, Shubhangi R. Kadam, N. J. Ranshur and<br />
V. M. Amrutsagar<br />
Zonal Agricultural Research Station, 97, Raviwarpeth, near DAV College, KrushakBhavan, Solapur<br />
413002, Maharashtra<br />
* ikbalbagwan97@gmail.com<br />
A Field experiment was conducted at Dry Farming Research Station, Solapur in order tostudythe<br />
foliar application <strong>of</strong> diammonium phosphate (DAP) on grain, stover yields, quality and nutrient<br />
uptake <strong>of</strong> chickpea var Vijay under dryland conditionduring year 2013-14 to 2019-20 on medium<br />
deep black soil. Results revealed that the application <strong>of</strong> general recommended dose <strong>of</strong> fertilizers<br />
Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming,<br />
INM, soil-microorganisms-plant interactions<br />
489 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
(25:50 kg/ha N:P2O5 + 5t/ha FYM) along with 2% diammonium phosphatefoliar spray at 50 per<br />
cent pod setting stage(60 to 65 DAS) registered significantly highest grain and stover yield<br />
(15.51 and 18.92 q/ha), moisture use efficiency (6.66 kg/ha/mm), protein yield (291.62 q/ha),<br />
total nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium uptake (64.75, 10.27 and 66.58 kg/ha, respectively) by<br />
chickpea at harvest, as well as highest net returns ( Rs. 56920/-) and B:C ratio (2.80) over rest <strong>of</strong><br />
the treatments.<br />
Chickpea (Cicerarientinum L.) is an important pulse crop <strong>of</strong> the semiarid tropicsparticularly in<br />
rainfed ecology <strong>of</strong> Indian subcontinent. It is the main source <strong>of</strong> dietary protein formajority <strong>of</strong><br />
Indian population. The average productivity <strong>of</strong> chickpea is about 823 kg/ha in India and that<br />
<strong>of</strong>Maharashtra is 614 kg/ha. The causes for low yield <strong>of</strong> chickpea are physiological factors such<br />
as insufficientpartitioning <strong>of</strong> assimilates, poor pod setting, excessive flower abscission and lack<br />
<strong>of</strong> nutrientsduring the critical growthstages <strong>of</strong> crop. The nutrients applied through soil<br />
application are not available to plants due to losses by leaching, denitrification or volatilization.<br />
The losses in nutrients can be reduced by foliar application or foliar nutritionto plants by<br />
applying liquid fertilizer directly to their leaves. The diammonium phosphate (DAP) is the<br />
world's most widely used phosphatic fertilizer as a excellent source <strong>of</strong>phosphorus and nitrogen<br />
for plant nutrition.The experiment was conducted at ZARS, Solapur to study effect <strong>of</strong><br />
foliarapplication <strong>of</strong> DAP at different growth stages on yield, quality and nutrient uptake<strong>of</strong><br />
Chickpea under dryland conditions.<br />
Methodology<br />
Theexperiment was laid out in a randomized block design (RBD), with six treatments and four<br />
replications. The treatments are T1: Absolute control, T2: GRDF (25:50 N:P2O5 kg/ha+5<br />
t/haFYM), T3: GRDF + 2% DAP foliar spray at first flower, T4: GRDF + 2% DAP foliarspray at<br />
50% flowering, T5: GRDF + 2% DAP foliar-spray at 50% pod set, T6:GRDF+2% DAPfoliar<br />
spray at the end <strong>of</strong> podding. The FYM was incorporated in the soil and theN and P was<br />
uniformly applied to each plot as a basal dose during all the years <strong>of</strong> theexperiment. The seed <strong>of</strong><br />
chickpea variety Vijay was sown in line with 30 x 10 cm spacing. The initial soil properties <strong>of</strong><br />
the experimentalplot were pH (1:2.5)7.5, electrical conductivity0.30 dS/m, organiccarbon 0.50%,<br />
Available nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium (155,12.70 and 550 kg/ha), field capacity 212<br />
mm, permanent wilting point 80 mm. The standard analytical methods were used for analysis <strong>of</strong><br />
soil and plant samples. The data obtained in respect <strong>of</strong> the observations wasstatistically analysed<br />
by using the procedures given by Panse and Sukhatme (1985).<br />
490 | Page Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming, INM, soilmicroorganisms-plant<br />
interactions
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Results<br />
The effect <strong>of</strong> foliar application <strong>of</strong> DAP at different growth stages <strong>of</strong> chickpea showedsignificant<br />
effect on grain and stover yield, moisture use efficiency and protein yield. The results revealed<br />
that treatment GRDF along with 2 % DAP foliar spray at 50 per cent pod setting stageshowed<br />
significantly higher grain and stover yield (15.51 and 18.92 q/ha) moisture use efficiency (6.66<br />
kg/ha/mm) and protein yield (291.62 q/ha), respectively over rest <strong>of</strong> treatments.However,MUE<br />
was at par with GRDF along with 2 % DAP foliar spray at 50 per centflowering stageSimilar<br />
grain and protein yield response <strong>of</strong> foliar application <strong>of</strong> different water-soluble fertilizers were<br />
also reported by Takankharet al. (2017), Eliset al. (2020) and Deshmukh et al. (2022) in<br />
chickpea. Treatment GRDF along with 2 per centdiammonium phosphate foliar spray at 50 %<br />
pod setting stagerecorded significantly higher N, P and K uptake (64.75,10.27 and 66.58<br />
kg/ha).Similar nutrient uptake studies were taken byDeshmukh et al. (2022) in chickpea.The<br />
treatment GRDF + 2 % DAP foliar spray at 50 per cent pod setting stage <strong>of</strong>chickpea showed<br />
significantly higher available N, P2O5 and K2O (176.38,16.14 and 546.50 kg/ha)respectively over<br />
control treatment.The treatment GRDF along with 2 per cent DAP foliar spray at 50 per cent pod<br />
setting stage<strong>of</strong> chickpea recorded highest net returns (Rs. 56,920 /- andB: C ratio (2.80) over rest<br />
<strong>of</strong>the treatments.<br />
Conclusion<br />
The application <strong>of</strong> recommended dose <strong>of</strong> N and P2O5 (25:50 kg/ha) along with 5 t FYM along<br />
with 2 per cent foliar spray <strong>of</strong> diammonium phosphate (DAP) is at 50 per cent pod setting stage<br />
was found to be superior for achievinghigher yield and monitory returns <strong>of</strong> chickpea under<br />
scarcity zone <strong>of</strong> Maharashtra<br />
References<br />
Deshmukh M., Jangilwad, M. D., Mundhe, S. S., Gupta, A., Kausadikar, H. K. 2022. Impact <strong>of</strong><br />
foliar application <strong>of</strong> specialty fertilizer on growth, yield, quality and macro and micro<br />
nutrient uptake <strong>of</strong> chickpea. Int. J. Cur.Microbiol. Appl. Sci.,11(09): 261-275.<br />
Elis, S., Ipekesen, S., Basdemir, F., Tunc, M., Bicer, T.B. 2020. Effect <strong>of</strong> different fertilizer<br />
forms on yield and yield components <strong>of</strong> chickpea varieties. Int. J. Agric. Environ. Food<br />
Sci.,4 (2): 209 – 215.<br />
Panse, V. G. and Sukhatme, P. V. 1985.Statistical methods for agricultural workers. ICAR, New<br />
Delhi<br />
Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming,<br />
INM, soil-microorganisms-plant interactions<br />
491 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Takankhar, V. G., Karanjikar, P. N. and Bhoye, S. R. 2017. Effect <strong>of</strong> foliar nutrition on growth,<br />
yield and quality<strong>of</strong> chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Asian J. Soil Sci., 12(2):296-299.<br />
Effect <strong>of</strong> foliar application <strong>of</strong> DAP on yield (q/ha) Protein yield and MUE <strong>of</strong>chickpea<br />
(Pooled mean)<br />
Treatment details<br />
Yield (q/ha)<br />
Grain<br />
Stover<br />
MUE<br />
(kg/ha/mm)<br />
Protein yield<br />
(kg/ha)<br />
T 1: Absolute control 8.28 9.64 3.71 148.75<br />
T 2: GRDF (25:50 N:P2O5 kg/ha + 5t/ha FYM 12.40 15.09 4.80 226.33<br />
T 3: GRDF+ 2% DAP foliar spray at first flower 13.68 16.76 5.63 254.25<br />
T 4: GRDF+ 2% DAP foliar spray at 50 % flowering 14.32 17.36 6.22 265.67<br />
T 5: GRDF+ 2% DAP foliar spray at 50 % pod set 15.51 18.92 6.66 291.62<br />
T 6: GRDF+ 2% DAP foliar spray at the end <strong>of</strong><br />
podding<br />
13.30 16.41 5.81 249.72<br />
SE ± 0.31 0.49 0.29 7.12<br />
CD @0.05 0.92 1.45 0.84 21.16<br />
T4-22P-1100<br />
Effect <strong>of</strong> Sulphur Levels and FYM on Yield, Oil Content and Nutrient Uptake<br />
<strong>of</strong> Safflower under Dryland Condition<br />
Shubhangi Kadam*, Archana Pawar, I.R. Bagwan, N.J. Ranshur and V.M. Amrutsagar<br />
Zonal Agricultural Research Station, 97, Raviwarpeth, near DAV College, Krushak Bhavan, Solapur<br />
413002, Maharashtra<br />
*shubhangipatil2612@gmail.com<br />
Safflower (Carthamustinctorius L.) is the crucial annual oilseed crop grown in rabiseason and<br />
occupies 0.64 lakh ha with productivity <strong>of</strong> 694 kg/ha in India during the year 2021-22. Sulphur<br />
fertilization influences the composition <strong>of</strong> the oil. Sulphur fertilization with an adequate supply<br />
<strong>of</strong> nitrogen and phosphorous accelerate the metabolic pathway <strong>of</strong> linolenic acid synthesis as it<br />
results in a large decrease in the percentage <strong>of</strong> stearic acid, oleic and linoleic acid with<br />
concurrent increase in the content <strong>of</strong> linolenic acid. FYM is a store house <strong>of</strong> several macro and<br />
micronutrients which are released during the process <strong>of</strong> mineralization and stimulated the<br />
activity <strong>of</strong> microorganism that make the plant nutrients readily available to the crop (Rasool et.<br />
al. 2013). Mineralization <strong>of</strong> organic matter releases sulphur in the available form to the plant and<br />
plant absorb sulphur mostly through roots in the form <strong>of</strong> sulphate (Singh et. al. 2001). In view <strong>of</strong><br />
492 | Page Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming, INM, soilmicroorganisms-plant<br />
interactions
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
these, the present investigation was carried out to study the effect <strong>of</strong> sulphur levels and FYM on<br />
yield, oil content and nutrient uptake <strong>of</strong> safflower under dryland condition.<br />
Methodology<br />
The experiment was laid out in RBD, with seven treatments combinations which were replicated<br />
four times and compared with the recommended dose. FYM as per the treatment was<br />
incorporated in the soil and the N and P was uniformly applied to each plot as a basal dose<br />
during both the years <strong>of</strong> the experiment. Sulphur was applied through elemental sulphur. The<br />
seeds <strong>of</strong> safflower variety SSF708 was line sown spaced at 45x20 cm. The standard analytical<br />
methods were used for analysis <strong>of</strong> soil and plant samples. The data obtained in respect <strong>of</strong> the<br />
observations was statistically analyzed by using the procedures given by Panse and Sukhatme<br />
(1985).<br />
Results<br />
Grain, straw, MUE, oil yield and oil content<br />
The study revealed that, GRDF along with sulphur40 kg/ha recorded significantly higher grain,<br />
straw, oil yield and oil content (15.83 and 38.42 q/ha, 6.30 kg/ha/ mm, 500.3 kg/ha and 31.60 %)<br />
over rest <strong>of</strong> the treatments. Increased in yield to be associated with release <strong>of</strong> nutrients during<br />
microbial decomposition. Kumar et al., (2009) reported that, use <strong>of</strong> organic manures along with<br />
inorganic fertilizers attribute to higher availability and adsorption <strong>of</strong> nutrients. Thirumelai and<br />
Khalak (1993) reported that, increase in stover yield in soybean might be due to supply <strong>of</strong><br />
essential mineral nutrients in balanced amount which resulted in better growth and development<br />
<strong>of</strong> plants.<br />
Nutrient uptake<br />
The pooled data regarding total nutrient uptake revealed that the treatment GRDF along with<br />
sulphur 40 kg/ha recorded significantly higher total nutrient uptake (41.56, 17.37 and 94.15<br />
kg/ha N, P and K) over the rest <strong>of</strong> treatment.<br />
Conclusion<br />
The application <strong>of</strong> recommended dose <strong>of</strong> NPK 50:25:00 kg ha -1 + FYM 1 tha -1 with sulphur 40<br />
kg ha -1 recorded significantly higher grain and stover yield (15.83 and 38.42 q ha -1 ) over rest <strong>of</strong><br />
the treatments.<br />
Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming,<br />
INM, soil-microorganisms-plant interactions<br />
493 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
References<br />
Kumar, R.P., Singh, O.N., Singh, Y., Dwivedi, S. and Singh, J.P., 2009. Effect <strong>of</strong> integrated<br />
nutrient management on growth, yield, nutrient uptake and economics <strong>of</strong> French bean<br />
(Phaseolus vulgaris). Indian J. Agric. Sci., 79(2): 122-128.<br />
Panse, V.G. and Sukhatme, P.V., 1985. Statistical methods for agricultural workers. ICAR, New<br />
Delhi.<br />
Rasool, F., Hasan, B., Aalum, I. and Gaine, S.A. 2013. Effect <strong>of</strong> nitrogen, sulphur and farmyard<br />
manure on growth dynamics and yield <strong>of</strong> sunflower (Helianthus annus L.) under temperate<br />
conditions. Sci. Res. Essays. 8(43): 2144-2147.<br />
Singh, V., Galande, M.K., Deshpande, M.B. and Nimbkar, N. 2001. Inheritance <strong>of</strong> wilt<br />
(Fusarium oxysporumf. sp. carthami) resistance in safflower. In proceedings <strong>of</strong> the 5 th<br />
International Safflower Conference, Williston, ND, and Sidney, MT, July: 23- 27.<br />
Thirumelai, M. and Khalak, A. 1993. Fertilizer application economics in French bean. Current<br />
Research University <strong>of</strong> Agricultural Sciences, Bangalore. 22(3-5): 67-69.<br />
Effect <strong>of</strong> GRDF and sulphur levels on nutrients uptake (kg/ha) <strong>of</strong> safflower under dryland<br />
Treatment details<br />
agriculture (pooled mean)<br />
Nutrients uptake (kg/ha)<br />
N P K<br />
Absolute Control 22.81 7.50 49.84<br />
GRDF (50:25:00 kg/ha N:P 2O 5:K 2O +1 t/ha FYM) 27.95 9.47 64.07<br />
GRDF + Sulphur 10 kg/ha 32.37 10.70 74.07<br />
GRDF + Sulphur 20 kg/ha 34.83 13.29 82.53<br />
GRDF + Sulphur 30 kg/ha 37.14 15.15 88.63<br />
GRDF + Sulphur 40kg/ha 41.56 17.37 94.15<br />
GRDF + Sulphur 50 kg/ha 39.18 16.03 90.60<br />
SE+ 0.84 0.51 1.98<br />
CD @0.05 2.48 1.49 5.82<br />
494 | Page Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming, INM, soilmicroorganisms-plant<br />
interactions
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
T4-23P-1114<br />
Changes in Soil Fertility Status after Long Term Application <strong>of</strong> Integrated<br />
Nutrient Management in Direct Seeded Rice-Field Pea Cropping System<br />
T. Chandrakar 1 , A. K. Thakur 1 , A. K. Kerketta 1 , A. Pradhan 1 , G. Ravindra Chary 2 ,<br />
K. A. Gopinath 2 and B. Narsimlu 2<br />
1 SG College <strong>of</strong> Agriculture & Research Station, Indira Gandhi Krishi Vishwavidylaya, Jagdalpur,<br />
Chhattisgarh-494001<br />
2 Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, Hyderabad<br />
India ranks second in the world for rice production involving high yielding rice varieties with<br />
intensive agriculture involving huge amount <strong>of</strong> nutrient removal. It can be seen that increase in<br />
application <strong>of</strong> inorganic nutrient sources cause the soil to deteriorate in terms <strong>of</strong> soil fertility.<br />
Application <strong>of</strong> organic sources <strong>of</strong> nutrients along with fertilizers has improved soil properties as<br />
well as maintained good soil health besides improving the availability <strong>of</strong> nutrients to plants and<br />
hence productivity also.<br />
Methodology<br />
A long-term field experiment has been conducted sincekharif 2014 at long term field trial <strong>of</strong><br />
dryland farm <strong>of</strong> Shaheed Gundadhur College <strong>of</strong> Agriculture and Research Station, Jagdalpur,<br />
Chhattisgarh. The experiment was conducted in a random bock design with twelve treatments<br />
(see table for treatment description) replicated four times. Soil organic carbon, available N, P and<br />
K were determined in the laboratory by standard procedures after rabi harvest <strong>of</strong> 2021-22.<br />
Results<br />
After a span <strong>of</strong> seven years <strong>of</strong> continuous cropping <strong>of</strong> rice- field pea with different treatments,<br />
significant variations in organic carbon status was observed. There was a 6-7.5 % increases in<br />
organic matter in treatments where FYM were given @ 5 t/ha as compared to initial (within the<br />
span <strong>of</strong> 7 years). The results were supported by findings <strong>of</strong> Zhao and Zhou (2011). Combined<br />
application <strong>of</strong> FYM and inorganic fertilizers exhibited significant effect on the soil available<br />
nitrogen. The highest amount (284 kg ha -1 ) <strong>of</strong> available nitrogen was estimated in 100% NPK+5<br />
t FYM(T6) followed by 281 kg ha -1 in 50% NPK+5 t FYM+ ZnSO4@25kg ha -1 (T11). The lowest<br />
value <strong>of</strong> (184 kg ha -1 ) available nitrogen in 100% PK (T3) was due to mining <strong>of</strong> available<br />
nitrogen for long period. Increase in available nitrogen is mainly attributed to direct addition <strong>of</strong><br />
FYM. The conditions promoting mineralization <strong>of</strong> nutrients are favorable organic carbon<br />
content, porosity, C: N ratio, water holding capacity, microbial activity etc. All these conditions<br />
Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming,<br />
INM, soil-microorganisms-plant interactions<br />
495 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
lead to convert unavailable form <strong>of</strong> nitrogen to available form and provide higher available<br />
nitrogen. There would be 26.7 % more available nitrogen after seven years <strong>of</strong> cropping<br />
under100% NPK+5 t FYM (T6) compared to initial. The results are in support with the<br />
estimations <strong>of</strong> Satish et al. (2011).<br />
The available phosphorus among treatments rangedfrom 17.67 (T1) to 29.68 kg ha -1 (T3)\.The<br />
maximum value <strong>of</strong> available phosphorus was recorded in 100% PK (T3). Statistically significant<br />
increase in available phosphorus was recorded among the treatments compared to its initial value<br />
<strong>of</strong> available soil phosphorus. There were increases in available soil phosphorus in all the<br />
treatments where phosphorus was applied. But highest increase was estimated in100% PK (T3)<br />
with 28 % more followed byT5 (100% NP) as compared to initial P status. The results were<br />
supported by findings <strong>of</strong> Walia et al. (2010).<br />
Effect <strong>of</strong> inorganic and organic sources <strong>of</strong> nutrient application in direct seeded rice-field<br />
pea cropping system on soil fertility under rainfed midland situation<br />
Treatment<br />
Organic<br />
C (%)<br />
Av. nutrients (kg/ha)<br />
N P K<br />
Initial values (at the start <strong>of</strong> expt. 2014-15) 0.67 224.6 23.18 154<br />
T1-Control 0.65 199.4 17.67 144<br />
T2-100% NPK 0.69 247.2 26.84 168<br />
T3-100% PK 0.64 184.4 29.68 180<br />
T4-100% NK 0.63 221.8 20.27 176<br />
T5-100% NP 0.65 225.2 28.69 139<br />
T6-100% NPK+5 t FYM 0.71 284.6 27.65 189<br />
T7-100% NPK+5 t FYM+ ZnSO 4@25kg 0.72 280.4 26.32 184<br />
T8-100% NPK+5 t FYM+ ZnSO 4@25kg ha -1 + Lime 3 q<br />
ha -1<br />
0.71 271.2 26.82 176<br />
T9-50% NPK 0.68 216.4 25.43 160<br />
T10-50% NPK + 5 t FYM 0.71 276.8 28.01 192<br />
T11-50% NPK + 5 t FYM+ ZnSO 4@25kg ha -1 0.72 281.2 28.71 188<br />
T12-50% NPK + 5 t FYM+ ZnSO 4@25kg ha -1 + Lime 3 q<br />
ha -1<br />
0.72 278.4 29.35 188<br />
CV(%) 8.88 18.78 12.15 16.5<br />
CD @5% 0.05 29.6 4.36 11.94<br />
496 | Page Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming, INM, soilmicroorganisms-plant<br />
interactions
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Continuous application <strong>of</strong> FYM along with fertilizers showed significant effect on soil available<br />
potassium. The range <strong>of</strong> available potassium content in soil among different treatments was 139<br />
to 192 kg ha -1 . The maximum value (192 kg ha -1 ) <strong>of</strong> available potassium content in soil was<br />
recorded in 50% NPK + 5 t FYM (T10). While the lowest value <strong>of</strong> soil available potassium (139)<br />
content was recorded in 100% NP (T5). Slight increase in the content <strong>of</strong> soil available potassium<br />
was found in the treatments comparing to the initial stage. The treatments where chemical<br />
fertilizer was applied along with FYM showed significantly high value <strong>of</strong> available potassium in<br />
soil. The organic manure along with chemical fertilizers resulted in an integrated influence on<br />
potassium availability to plant as the organic matter increase accessible adsorption sites for<br />
potassium.<br />
Conclusion<br />
The combined application <strong>of</strong> FYM along with fertilizers could enhance the soil fertility status in<br />
terms <strong>of</strong> increase in organic carbon, available N, P and K in soil.<br />
References<br />
Satish, A., Hugar, A.Y., Kusagur, N. and Chandrappa, H. 2011. Effect <strong>of</strong> integrated nutrient<br />
management on soil fertility status and productivity <strong>of</strong> rice-maize sequence under<br />
permanent plot experiment. Indian J. Agric. Res. 45 (4): 320-325.<br />
Walia, M. K., Walia, S. S. and Dhaliwal, S. S. 2010. Long term effect <strong>of</strong> integrated nutrient<br />
management <strong>of</strong> properties <strong>of</strong> typic ustochrept after 23 cycles <strong>of</strong> an irrigated rice wheat<br />
system. J. <strong>of</strong> sustainable agriculture. 34:724-743.<br />
Zhao, J. and Zhou, L. 2011. Combined Application <strong>of</strong> Organic and Inorganic Fertilizers on Black<br />
Soil Fertility and Maize Yield. J. <strong>of</strong> Northeast Agriculture University (English Edition).<br />
18(2): 24-29.<br />
Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming,<br />
INM, soil-microorganisms-plant interactions<br />
497 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
T4-24P-1130<br />
Response <strong>of</strong> Mung bean to Higher Doses <strong>of</strong> Fertilizers under Rainfed<br />
Conditions<br />
M. D. Giri*, A. N. Paslawar and N. K. Patke<br />
Department <strong>of</strong> Agronomy<br />
Dr. Panjabrao Deshmukh Krishi Vidhyapeeth, Akola 444 104 (Maharashtra), India<br />
* mdgiri@pdkv.ac.in<br />
India is the largest producer <strong>of</strong> pulses in the world, with a 24% share in global production; it is<br />
also a big consumer and exporter <strong>of</strong> pulses in the world. Being an economical source <strong>of</strong> protein,<br />
high fiber content, vitamins, and minerals, along with the unique ability to restore soil health,<br />
pulses have assumed the universal remedy for sustainable production. Pulses are the major<br />
source <strong>of</strong> protein and carbohydrates in the Indian diet. The major pulse crops <strong>of</strong> India are<br />
chickpea (48%), pigeonpea (15%), mungbean (7%), urdbean (7%), lentil (5%), and field pea<br />
(5%). Mungbean (Vigna radiata) is an important pulse crop in India and is believed to be<br />
originated from India. It is a short-duration legume crop. It is traditionally grown mainly in<br />
Asian regions, while its cultivation has spread to other parts <strong>of</strong> the world recently. India<br />
contributes more than 70% <strong>of</strong> the world’s mungbean production. Mungbean is grown on more<br />
than 5.0 million ha in the country, mainly in Rajasthan, Maharashtra, Madhya Pradesh,<br />
Karnataka, Orissa, and Bihar, with a total production <strong>of</strong> 3.09 million tonnes. The average<br />
productivity <strong>of</strong> the mungbean crop is 600kg/ha. Fertilizers can increase food grain production<br />
and reduce the risk and uncertainty associated with the production <strong>of</strong> food crops. Mungbean is an<br />
important Kharif season short-duration pulse crop grown on an area <strong>of</strong> 0.90 lakh ha in the<br />
Vidarbha region <strong>of</strong> Maharashtra state. An increased fertilizer dose was observed beneficial for<br />
the mungbean crop in Vidarbha.Therefore, this study aimed to assess the impact <strong>of</strong> different<br />
doses <strong>of</strong> fertilizers, farm yard manure, and bi<strong>of</strong>ertilizers on mungbean in a rainfed environment.<br />
The experiment was conducted at Dr. Panjabrao Deshmukh Krishi Vidyapeeth, Akola<br />
(Maharashtra), India, between 2018 and 2020. The experiment was laid out in a randomized<br />
complete block design with three factors with three replications. There were three fertilizer doses<br />
(N1:75% RDF, N2:100%RDF, and N3:125% RDF),twoFYM applications (F1: Control and F2:5<br />
t/ha), and three seed treatments with bi<strong>of</strong>ertilizers (B1: Rhizobium, B2: LMn 16, and B3:<br />
Rhizobium + LMn 16).Results indicated that 125% RDF application in mungbean crops<br />
increased plant height, pods/plant, seed yield/plant, seed yield (kg/ha), and B: C<br />
ratio.Furthermore, higher doses <strong>of</strong> fertilizer increased the number <strong>of</strong> root nodules per plant and<br />
the dry weight <strong>of</strong> root nodules over other fertilizer doses.Application <strong>of</strong> the higher doses also<br />
498 | Page Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming, INM, soilmicroorganisms-plant<br />
interactions
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
resulted in the higher uptake <strong>of</strong> nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium by seed and straw <strong>of</strong><br />
mungbean. Applying FYM @ 5t/ha resulted in a significantly higher seed yield and the uptake <strong>of</strong><br />
nutrients by the mungbean. Various bi<strong>of</strong>ertilizers influenced yield parameters, seed yield, and<br />
nutrient uptake by the mungbean. We hope this research will improve mungbean yields in<br />
rainfed areas by identifying the optimal fertilizer and FYM dose.<br />
T4-25P-1143<br />
Response <strong>of</strong> Soybean Varieties to Integrated Nutrient Management under<br />
Rain-fed Condition in New Alluvial Zone <strong>of</strong> West Bengal<br />
Anusree Paul 1 , N.W.E. Lay Lay 2 and Dhananjoy Dutta 1<br />
1 Department <strong>of</strong> Agronomy, Bidhan Chandra Krishi Viswavidyalay, Mohanpur, Nadia, West Bengal, India<br />
-741 252<br />
2 Department <strong>of</strong> Agriculture, Ministry <strong>of</strong> Agriculture, Livestock and Irrigation, Myanmar<br />
Low yield <strong>of</strong> soybean in India is mainly due to lack <strong>of</strong> suitable varieties along with nutrient and<br />
moisture stresses under rain-fed condition. Therefore, it is essential to find outsuitable varieties<br />
and efficient nutrient management for improving the productivity <strong>of</strong> Kharif soybean.<br />
Methodology<br />
Afield experiment was conducted during Kharif seasons <strong>of</strong> 2019-2020 and 2020-2021 at BCKV,<br />
West Bengal, insandy loam alluvial soil (Inceptisol)with neutral pH (7.20), medium organic<br />
carbon (0.61%), low available nitrogen (191.8 kg/ha), high phosphorus (27.1 kg/ha), medium<br />
potassium (171.5 kg/ha)and low zinc (0.50 ppm)status tostudy the effect <strong>of</strong> different nutrient<br />
management practices on growth, yield and quality <strong>of</strong> soybean varieties as well as economics <strong>of</strong><br />
production in a factorial randomized block designhaving three soybean varietiessuch as V1-<br />
PS1225,V2- YEZIN 15andV3- PS24 [varieties V1 and V3(115 days duration) released from India<br />
and V2 (110 days duration) from Myanmar] as factor A and five nutrient management<br />
treatments.viz., N1- 100% RDF (N: P2O5: K2O @ 20:60:40 kg/ha), N2- 75% RDF + 3 t/ha<br />
FYM,N3- 75% RDF+ 1.5 t/ha vermicompost, N4-75% RDF + 3 t/ha FYM + 25 kg/ha ZnSO4<br />
andN5- 75% RDF + 1.5 t/ha vermicompost + 25 kg/ha ZnSO4 as factor B withthree replications.<br />
The crop was grown with a seed rate <strong>of</strong> 80 kg/ha and 45 cm × 10 cmspacing under rain-fed<br />
condition with rainfall <strong>of</strong> 1017.1 and 1077.1 mm in 2019-2020 and2020-2021 respectively during<br />
experimental period.<br />
Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming,<br />
INM, soil-microorganisms-plant interactions<br />
499 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Results<br />
Pooled data revealed that significantly taller plant (66.82 cm) with higher aerial dry matter<br />
(685.38 g/m 2 ), nodule number/plant (43.19) andseed yield (2320 kg/ha) were recorded with N5<br />
treatmentand the lowest values were obtained under N1, whereas,seed oil content(20.15%) was<br />
highest in 100%RDF.Interaction effects showed that variety PS 24 and nutrient treatment N5<br />
(V3N5)excelled others in terms <strong>of</strong> plant height (73.81 cm), aerial dry matter (767.09 g/m 2 ), nodule<br />
number/plant (51.21) and seed yield (2601kg/ha). Maximum seed oil content (21.18%) was<br />
obtained with V2N1 combination. Highest gross return (Rs.75,448/ha), net return (Rs. 42,994/ha)<br />
and benefit-cost ratio (2.32) was obtained with V3N5.<br />
Conclusion<br />
The PS 24 variety along with application <strong>of</strong> 1. 5 t/ha vermicompost plus 75% RDF and 25 ZnSO4<br />
kg/ha can be recommended for Kharif soybean under rain-fed condition in new alluvial zone <strong>of</strong><br />
West Bengal.<br />
Effect <strong>of</strong> varieties and nutrient management on growthparameters <strong>of</strong> soybean (pooled)<br />
Varieties (V)<br />
Treatments<br />
Plant height<br />
(cm)<br />
Aerial dry<br />
matter (g/m 2 )<br />
Number <strong>of</strong><br />
nodules/<br />
plants<br />
V 1 (PS 1225) 62.13 619.92 35.36<br />
V 2 (Yezin 15) 53.02 525.94 23.83<br />
V 3 (PS 24) 69.66 705.48 46.55<br />
S. Em. (±) 0.98 10.60 1.08<br />
C. D. (P= 0.05) 2.86 30.98 3.17<br />
Nutrient Management (N)<br />
N 1 (100% RDF) 55.28 550.16 26.66<br />
N 2 (75% RDF + 3 t/ha FYM) 58.76 588.11 31.59<br />
N 3 (75% RDF + 1.5 t/ha vermicompost) 64.70 644.32 38.87<br />
N 4(75% RDF + 3 t/ha FYM+ 25 kg/ha ZnSO 4) 62.46 617.59 35.93<br />
N 5 (75% RDF +1.5 t/ha vermicompost +25 kg/ha<br />
ZnSO 4) 66.82<br />
685.38 43.19<br />
S. Em. (±) 1.08 12.18 1.43<br />
C. D. (P= 0.05) 3.16 35.60 4.20<br />
Interaction (V × N)<br />
V 1N 1 53.78 526.58 22.46<br />
500 | Page Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming, INM, soilmicroorganisms-plant<br />
interactions
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
V 1N 2 58.25 591.98 31.83<br />
V 1N 3 66.00 641.60 39.74<br />
V 1N 4 63.50 633.13 36.64<br />
V 1N 5 68.68 706.32 46.14<br />
V 2N 1 47.57 469.49 15.96<br />
V 2N 2 49.26 495.92 18.84<br />
V 2N 3 57.45 551.27 27.44<br />
V 2N 4 53.37 530.32 24.70<br />
V 2N 5 58.46 582.72 32.22<br />
V 3N 1 64.49 654.42 41.57<br />
V 3N 2 67.78 676.43 44.09<br />
V 3N 3 71.68 740.13 49.44<br />
V 3N 4 70.02 689.33 46.45<br />
V 3N 5 73.81 767.09 51.21<br />
S. Em. (±) 1.18 13.67 1.61<br />
C. D. (P=0.05) 3.45 39.96 4.71<br />
T4-26P-1162<br />
Water-Soluble Fertilizers for Foliar Supplementation in Rainfed Areas<br />
S. S. Balloli*, Ch. Srinivasa Rao, Jyothi Lakshmi, Amit Srivasatava, K. Sammi Reddy and<br />
V. K. Singh<br />
ICAR-Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, Santoshnagar, Hyderabad - 500 059<br />
* ss.balloli@icar.gov.in<br />
Studies were conducted to understand whether application <strong>of</strong> water-soluble fertilizers through<br />
foliar sprays during the vegetative stage can enhance the yield <strong>of</strong> maize and whether application<br />
<strong>of</strong> micro (zinc) and beneficial elements (selenium) can help in influencing some <strong>of</strong> the plant<br />
physiological processes and in-turn help minimize the yield reduction due to drought/insufficient<br />
soil moisture.<br />
Methodology<br />
A field experiment with maize cv. DHM 117 was carried out in kharif at Gungal Research Farm<br />
(GRF) in randomized block design with nine treatments and three replications. The treatments<br />
tried were: 1) T1: recommended dose <strong>of</strong> fertilizer ie 90:45: 45 kg NPK/ha, 2) T2: T1 without top<br />
dressing <strong>of</strong> 45 kg N/ha at 25 DAS+ foliar spray <strong>of</strong> 0.5% water soluble fertilizer + 0.5% ZnSO4<br />
Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming,<br />
INM, soil-microorganisms-plant interactions<br />
501 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
+ 20g/ha <strong>of</strong> sodium selenite at 23 and 55 DAS after sowing, T3: T1+ foliar spray <strong>of</strong> 0.5% water<br />
soluble fertilizer + 0.5% ZnSO4 + 20g/ha <strong>of</strong> sodium selenite at 23 and 55 DAS after sowing, T4:<br />
T1+ foliar spray <strong>of</strong> 0.5% water soluble fertilizer + 0.5% ZnSO4 + 20g/ha <strong>of</strong> sodium selenite at<br />
55 after sowing only, T5: T1+ foliar spray <strong>of</strong> 0.5% water soluble fertilizer + 0.5% ZnSO4 +<br />
20g/ha <strong>of</strong> sodium selenite at 23 after sowing only, T6: No basal but top dressing only foliar<br />
spray <strong>of</strong> 0.5% water soluble fertilizer + 0.5% ZnSO4 + 20g/ha <strong>of</strong> sodium selenite at 23 and 55<br />
DAS, T7: T1+ foliar spray <strong>of</strong> 0.5% water soluble fertilizer at 23 and 55 DAS, T8: T1+ foliar<br />
spray <strong>of</strong> Plant Agromagic water soluble fertilizer @ 4g /L, T9: Absolute control, no fertilizers.<br />
Results<br />
Results <strong>of</strong> the field experiment revealed that application <strong>of</strong> recommended dose <strong>of</strong> fertilizer +<br />
spraying <strong>of</strong> 0.5% ZnSO4 + 20 g/ha <strong>of</strong> sodium selenite at 25 and 55 DAS resulted in highest grain<br />
yield <strong>of</strong> maize followed by treatments T4 and T5. The lowest grain yield <strong>of</strong> maize was recorded<br />
in T6 treatment where no fertilizers were applied basally but only spraying <strong>of</strong> water-soluble<br />
fertilizer, ZnSO4 and sodium selenite were taken up as compared to absolute control where no<br />
fertilizers were added indicating that the spraying <strong>of</strong> water-soluble fertilizers and micronutrients<br />
will have adverse effect on plants which are nutrient stressed. It is also evident from the Figure<br />
1 that the treatment T2 where no top dressing <strong>of</strong> 45 kg N/ha was given resulted in lower yield as<br />
compared to treatment T1 indicating that the water-soluble fertilizers can be used as a<br />
supplement to the conventional fertilizers like urea, DAP, MOP. The significant increase in the<br />
grain yield <strong>of</strong> maize in treatments receiving foliar sprays is attributed due to the increase in the<br />
uptake <strong>of</strong> nitrogen, phosphors, potassium and zinc by the maize crop. The soil test values for<br />
available N, P, K and available Zn after the harvest <strong>of</strong> the maize crop did vary significantly in the<br />
treatments studied. The total chlorophyll content was highest in T3 treatment as compared to<br />
other treatments analyzed from the plant samples collected one day after the second spraying ie<br />
on the 61st DAS indicating that spraying <strong>of</strong> water-soluble fertilizers along with micronutrients<br />
and selenium at 30 and 60 DAS has resulted in higher photosynthetic ability.<br />
Conclusions<br />
The results <strong>of</strong> the study indicate that the water-soluble fertilizers can be used as a supplement to<br />
the conventional fertilizers like urea, DAP, MOP.<br />
502 | Page Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming, INM, soilmicroorganisms-plant<br />
interactions
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
3500<br />
3000<br />
2500<br />
2000<br />
1500<br />
1000<br />
500<br />
0<br />
T1 T2 T3 T4 T5 T6 T7 T8 T9<br />
Maize yield (kg/ha) as influenced by different treatments<br />
T4-27P-1183<br />
Foliar Nutrition; a key to Integrated Nutrient Management in Vegetable<br />
Cowpea<br />
R.K. Krishnasree 1 and Sheeja K. Raj 2<br />
1 Pr<strong>of</strong>essor Jayashankar Telangana State Agricultural University, Telangana, India 500030<br />
2 Kerala Agricultural University, Thrissur, Kerala India, 680656<br />
Foliar fertilization is the term used for the application <strong>of</strong> suitable concentrations <strong>of</strong> plant<br />
nutrients on foliage <strong>of</strong> growing plants. Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata subsp. unguiculata (L.)<br />
Verdcourt), one <strong>of</strong> the widely cultivated vegetables <strong>of</strong> Kerala, is valued for its tender pods. The<br />
fertilizer schedule recommended for cowpea ends within 20 DAS (days after sowing) which is<br />
inadequate to meet the nutrient requirements <strong>of</strong> later formed flowers and pods. On the other<br />
hand, fate <strong>of</strong> soil applied nutrients is dependent on soil-nutrient interactions. Hence foliar<br />
nutritionacts as an effective means to cater to the nutrient demands <strong>of</strong> later formed flushes.<br />
Integrated nutrient management is a promising means <strong>of</strong> efficient utilization <strong>of</strong> resources and it<br />
helps in achieving higher crop productivity at lesser expense. Foliar nutrition can fit as an<br />
efficient tool into INM scheme. It eliminates nutrient wastages and produces more yield per unit<br />
nutrient applied. The present study was formulated to find out the effect <strong>of</strong> foliar nutrition <strong>of</strong><br />
water-soluble fertilizers, Zn and B in maximizing the yield <strong>of</strong> bush vegetable cowpea.<br />
Methodology<br />
The experiment was conducted during Rabi 2020 at Coconut Research Station, Balaramapuram,<br />
Kerala, India with 13 treatments in 3 replications in a randomized block design (RBD). Bush<br />
Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming,<br />
INM, soil-microorganisms-plant interactions<br />
503 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
cowpea variety Bhagyalakshmi released from Kerala Agricultural University was used for the<br />
study. At the time <strong>of</strong> second ploughing, 20 t ha -1 dried powdered FYM was applied to the<br />
treatment plots. Chemical fertilizers were applied @ 20:30:10 kg NPK ha -1 (RDF). Urea, rajphos<br />
and muriate <strong>of</strong> potash respectively were used as source <strong>of</strong> NPK for the experiment. Water<br />
soluble NPK fertilizer (19:19:19), NK fertilizer KNO3 (13.7% N and 46% K2O), zinc sulphate<br />
heptahydrate (21% Zn) and solubor (20.9% B) were used for foliar application. Seeds primed in<br />
ZnSO4 (0.05%) for 4 h were dibbled at a spacing <strong>of</strong> 30 cm x 15 cm.<br />
Results<br />
Significantly higher dry matterwas recorded by all the treatments involving foliar application<br />
compared to RDF due to the quick access <strong>of</strong> plants to nutrients (Dey et al., 2017). Better growth<br />
expression withRDF + 0.5% 19:19:19 + 0.025% solubor at 45 DAS is evident from its highest<br />
dry matter production and CGR at final harvest. This can be attributed to its significantly higher<br />
N, P and K uptake. It recorded the highest number <strong>of</strong> pods per plant, which is due to the<br />
favourable influence <strong>of</strong> B in enhancing the fruit setting percentage by promoting the germination<br />
<strong>of</strong> pollen and elongation <strong>of</strong> pollen tube (Narayanammaet al., 2009). Higher chlorophyll content<br />
in this treatment can be ascribed to the higher N content <strong>of</strong> leaves as evident from the data on N<br />
uptake. Foliar nutrition enhanced the nodule fresh weight from 0.05 to 1.35 g per plant. Zinc is<br />
actively involved in the biosynthesis <strong>of</strong> leghaemoglobin (Das et al., 2012) as evident from<br />
nodule fresh weight T4 and T6. Perusal <strong>of</strong> data on B: C ratio revealed that all the foliar<br />
application treatments registered higher B: C ratio compared to RDF. The highest B: C ratio was<br />
registered in T5 (2.26) due to higher yield.<br />
Effect <strong>of</strong> foliar nutrition on uptake <strong>of</strong> N, P and K<br />
504 | Page Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming, INM, soilmicroorganisms-plant<br />
interactions
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Effect <strong>of</strong> foliar nutrition on dry matter production at final harvest (g plant -1 ) Crop Growth<br />
Rate, CGR (g m -2 day -1 ), nodule fresh weight (g plant -1 ), number <strong>of</strong> pods per plant and B:C<br />
Treatment<br />
ratio<br />
Dry matter<br />
production at<br />
final harvest<br />
T 1 : RDF (½ N, full P and K basal and ½ N at 20 DAS) 24.69 1.53<br />
T 2 : RDF + 0.5% 19:19:19 at 45 DAS 35.28 2.23<br />
T 3 : RDF + 0.5% 19:19:19 at 45 & 60 DAS 29.55 1.68<br />
T 4 : RDF + 0.5% 19:19:19 + 0.05% ZnSO 4 at 45 DAS 31.65 1.78<br />
T 5 : RDF + 0.5% 19:19:19 + 0.025% solubor at 45 DAS 39.51 2.26<br />
T 6 : RDF + 0.5% 19:19:19 + 0.05% ZnSO 4 + solubor 0.025% at 45 DAS 34.28 2.12<br />
T 7 : RDF + 0.5% 19:19:19 + 0.05% ZnSO 4 + solubor 0.025% at 45 DAS +<br />
0.5% 19:19:19 at 60 DAS<br />
B: C<br />
ratio<br />
30.11 1.76<br />
T 8: RDF + 0.5% KNO 3 at 45 DAS 37.52 2.07<br />
T 9 : RDF + 0.5% KNO 3 at 45 & 60 DAS 32.60 1.69<br />
T 10 : RDF + 0.5% KNO 3 + 0.05% ZnSO 4 at 45 DAS 33.95 1.81<br />
T 11 : RDF + 0.5% KNO 3 + 0.025% solubor at 45 DAS 35.41 2.12<br />
T 12: RDF + 0.5% KNO 3 + 0.05% ZnSO 4 + solubor 0.025% at 45 DAS 35.61 1.90<br />
T 13 : RDF + 0.5% KNO 3 + 0.05% ZnSO 4 + solubor 0.025% at 45 DAS +<br />
0.5% KNO 3 at 60 DAS<br />
SEm (±) 1.34<br />
CD (0.05) 3.925<br />
Conclusion<br />
36.89 1.88<br />
Supplementation <strong>of</strong> major and micro nutrients through foliar feeding at 45 DAS avoided<br />
physiological stresses and contributed to higher pod yield in foliar nutrition treatments.<br />
Application <strong>of</strong> N, P, K, Zn and B was possible through foliar application at lower cost compared<br />
to individual soil application <strong>of</strong> these nutrients. Hence foliar nutrition is a key to INM in bush<br />
vegetable cowpea.<br />
References<br />
Das, S., Pareek, N., Raverkar, K.P., Chandra, R and Kaustav, A. 2012. Effectiveness <strong>of</strong> micronutrient<br />
application and Rhizobium inoculation on growth and yield <strong>of</strong> Chickpea. Int. J. Agric. Environ.<br />
Biotech., 5(4): 445- 452.<br />
Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming,<br />
INM, soil-microorganisms-plant interactions<br />
505 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Dey, S., Prasad, S., Tiwari, P and Sharma, P. 2017. Effect <strong>of</strong> urea, KCl, zinc placement and spray on<br />
growth <strong>of</strong> cowpea. J. Pharmacog. Phytochem., 6(6): 971-973.<br />
Narayanamma, M., Rani, R., Lalitha, K., Kameshwari, P. and Reddy, R.V.S.K. 2009. Effect <strong>of</strong> foliar<br />
application <strong>of</strong> micronutrients on the yield components, yield and nutrient content <strong>of</strong> bitter gourd.<br />
Orissa J. Hortic., 37(2): 1-5.<br />
T4-28P-1190<br />
Impact <strong>of</strong> Integrated Nutrient Management on Wheat (TriticumAestivumL.)<br />
in Eastern Uttar Pradesh<br />
Ambuj Kumar Singh and Ram Swaroop Meena<br />
Department <strong>of</strong> Agronomy, Institute <strong>of</strong> Agricultural sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, India-<br />
221005<br />
* ambujsingh67@bhu.ac.in<br />
Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) is number one cereal <strong>of</strong> the world and is grown on the largest area.<br />
It is cultured on about 220 million hectares area in the world and delivers almost 21% <strong>of</strong> our<br />
food calories and 20% <strong>of</strong> protein for more than 4.5 million people. In India, during past three<br />
decades, intensive agriculture involving exhaustive high yielding varieties <strong>of</strong> cereals particularly<br />
wheat has led to heavy mining <strong>of</strong> nutrients from the soil. The crop removes annually large<br />
quantities <strong>of</strong> plant nutrients from soil. The number and degree <strong>of</strong> micronutrients is also<br />
increasing at fast pace because erratic, excessive and imbalanced use <strong>of</strong> chemical fertilizers has<br />
increased which causes high the demand <strong>of</strong> micronutrients for achieving higher yield. Wheat<br />
area is decreasing every year and there is a very little scope for expansion <strong>of</strong> area in future. So,<br />
there is urgent need to maintain the soil fertility for stability and sustainability in the productivity<br />
<strong>of</strong> wheat crop. There are lot <strong>of</strong> agricultural wastes like crop residues, cow dung, poultry manure<br />
and by products <strong>of</strong> agriculture-based industries like press mud, bagasses,etc. which can be<br />
recycled to soil which not only increase the chemical, physical and biological properties <strong>of</strong> soil<br />
but also improve the crop quality by balanced nutrition. The integrated nutrient management is<br />
the answer to most <strong>of</strong> the present-day problems <strong>of</strong> malnutrition <strong>of</strong> crops along with chemical<br />
pollution (Ghanshyam et al., 2010). Therefore, the present investigation was done to evaluate the<br />
effect <strong>of</strong> different combination <strong>of</strong> organic material and inorganic material on productivity <strong>of</strong><br />
wheat.<br />
506 | Page Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming, INM, soilmicroorganisms-plant<br />
interactions
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Methodology<br />
The present investigation was performed at Agriculture research farm, Institute <strong>of</strong> Agricultural<br />
Sciences (IAS), BHU, Varanasi during Rabi 2017-2018 to evaluate the effect <strong>of</strong> integrated nutrient<br />
management on wheat yield attributes in eastern Uttar Pradesh. The experiment was laid out in<br />
randomized block design having eight treatments i.e. Control (No fertilizer), 100% RDF NPK, 100%<br />
RDF NPK+ Zn +Fe, 75% RDF NPK+ Carpet waste compost+ Zn+Fe, 75%RDF NPK+Wheat straw<br />
compost+ Zn+Fe, 75% RDF NPK+Bagasse compost+ Zn+Fe ,75% RDF NPK+Paddy straw compost<br />
+ Zn+Fe, 75% RDF NPK+Pressmud compost+ Zn+Fe and was replicated thrice.<br />
Results<br />
Results indicated that among all the treatment combinations highest spike length, number <strong>of</strong> grains<br />
per spike and test weight was recorded in the treatment combination <strong>of</strong> 75% RDF NPK+ Pressmud+<br />
Zn+Fe. The minimum spike length, number <strong>of</strong> grains per spike and test weight was observed in<br />
control treatment. And among all the treatment combinations highest grain yield and straw yield was<br />
recorded in the treatment combination <strong>of</strong> 75% RDF NPK+ Pressmud+ Zn+Fe. The minimum yield<br />
was observed in control treatment.highest harvest index was also recorded for the treatment<br />
combination <strong>of</strong> 75% RDF NPK+ Pressmud+ Zn+Fe. However, the application <strong>of</strong> 75% RDF NPK+<br />
Paddy straw compost+Zn+Fe and 75% RDF NPK+ Bagases+Zn+Fegross return were found at par to<br />
each other. Amongst the treatment, the highest gross return was recorded in the treatment<br />
combination <strong>of</strong> 75% RDF NPK+ Pressmud+ Zn+Fe (72860₹ha -1 ), which was significantly higher<br />
than the other treatment combinations. The minimum gross return (35833 ₹ha -1 ) was observed in<br />
control.<br />
6000 Yield <strong>of</strong> wheat<br />
5000<br />
4000<br />
3000<br />
2000<br />
1000<br />
0<br />
Grain yield<br />
kg per ha<br />
Straw yiled<br />
kg ha<br />
harvest<br />
index (%)<br />
Impact <strong>of</strong> integrated nutrients management on yield <strong>of</strong> wheat<br />
Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming,<br />
INM, soil-microorganisms-plant interactions<br />
507 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Conclusion<br />
The present findings <strong>of</strong> the study indicated the application <strong>of</strong> 75% RDF+<br />
pressmud+Zn+Fegreatly influenced the yield along with improvement<strong>of</strong> the the yield attributes,<br />
yieldand quality <strong>of</strong> wheat in eastern UP.<br />
References<br />
Ghanshyam Kumar, R. and Jat, R.K. 2010. Productivity and soil fertility as affected by organic<br />
manures and inorganic fertilizers in greengram (Vigna radiata) - wheat (Triticum aestivum)<br />
system. Indian J. Agron. 55(1): 16-21.<br />
T4-29P-1228<br />
Effect <strong>of</strong> Integrated Nutrient Management on Growth Yield and Economics <strong>of</strong><br />
Rainfed Chickpea (CicerArietinum L.)<br />
S. M. Kurmvanshi*, R. K. Tiwari, Sudhanshu Pandey, Abhishek Soni,<br />
Satish Singh Baghel and Sonali Pandey<br />
All India coordinected Research Project on Dryland Agriculture<br />
JNKVV College <strong>of</strong> Agriculture, Rewa 486001 (M.P.)<br />
* sheshmanikurmvanshi@gmail.com<br />
Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) is world’s third most important winter season pulse crop after<br />
beans and field pea. It is grown in tropical, subtropical and temperate regions <strong>of</strong> the world. It<br />
contains high 20-22 % protein, rich in fibre, carbohydrates, vitamins and minerals (Guar et al.<br />
2010) The production <strong>of</strong> pulse crops in our county including chickpea is not enough to meet the<br />
domestic demand <strong>of</strong> the population. There is vast scope to enhance the productivity <strong>of</strong> chickpea<br />
by improved Aagronomic practices and balanced nutrient management with bio fertilizers.<br />
Fertilizers are becoming costlier and it is becoming difficult for the poor farmers with poor<br />
economic means to apply recommended doses <strong>of</strong> fertilizers. It is now well realized that to protect<br />
the soil health, judicious use <strong>of</strong> fertilizers and combination <strong>of</strong> organic and inorganic sources <strong>of</strong><br />
nutrients is beneficial. Pulses are mainly grown in marginal lands and poor productivity <strong>of</strong> the<br />
crops is mainly due to inadequate nutrient supply.<br />
Methodology<br />
The field experiment was conducted during winterseason <strong>of</strong> 2020-21 under AICRP for Dryland<br />
Agriculture, JNKVV Kuthulia farm, College <strong>of</strong> Agriculture, Rewa (M.P.) The soil <strong>of</strong> the<br />
experimental field was silty clay- loam having pH 6.78, electrical conductivity 0.41 DS/ m,<br />
508 | Page Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming, INM, soilmicroorganisms-plant<br />
interactions
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
organic carbon 0.49% available N 197.40 kg/ha, available P2O5 10.62 kg/ha and available K2O<br />
335, 20 kg/ha. The nine integrated nutrient management treatments were laid out in a<br />
randomized complete block design keeping three replications.<br />
Results<br />
The data indicate that the application <strong>of</strong> 50% RDN through fertilizer + 50% RDN through<br />
compost + Rhizobium ciceri as in T9 recorded significantly higher seed yield (11.06 q/ha) straw<br />
yield 15.48 q/ha) and harvest index 41.29%). The combined use <strong>of</strong> organic and inorganic<br />
fertilizers along with bi<strong>of</strong>erilizers has been reported not only to meet the nutrients need <strong>of</strong> the<br />
crop but also has been found to sustain large – scale productivity goals. These results are in<br />
accordance with the findings <strong>of</strong> Meena and Baldev, 2013.<br />
Amongst the integrated nutrient management treatments, T9 having (50% RDN through fertilizer<br />
+ 50% RDN through compost + Rhizobium ciceri) gave the maximum net income upto Rs.<br />
29900/ha with 2.02 B:C ratio which was followed by T2 (100% NPK through fertilizer), The net<br />
income was Rs. 20020/ha under under 100% RDN by organic source. However, the lowest net<br />
income fetched in T1 which was Rs. 7851/ha. The net income under these integrated nutrient<br />
management treatments was exactly in accordance with the increased grain yield and higher<br />
market values.<br />
References<br />
Gour, P.M., Tripathi, S., Gowda, C. L. L., Ranga Ji, Rao, V., Sharma, H. C., Pande, S. and<br />
Sharma, M. 2010. Chickpea seed production manual. Patanchera-502324, Andhra Pradesh,<br />
India, International crop research institute for the semi arid tropics. pp 28.<br />
Meena, B. S. and Baldev, R. 2013. Effect <strong>of</strong> integrated nutrient management on productivity,<br />
Soil fertility and economics <strong>of</strong> chickpea varieties in vertisol.Ann. Agric. Sci. New series.<br />
34: 225-230.<br />
Yield and economical gain from chickpea as influenced by integrated nutrient management<br />
Tr.<br />
No.<br />
Treatments<br />
Number<br />
<strong>of</strong> pods/<br />
plant<br />
Seed<br />
yield<br />
(q/ha)<br />
Straw<br />
yield<br />
(q/ha)<br />
Harvest<br />
index (%)<br />
T1 Control 36.84 6.13 11.55 35.53 1.31<br />
T2 100% NPK through fertilizer 40.36 10.33 15.00 40.80 1.98<br />
T3 100% RDN through compost 41.24 9.00 14.00 39.13 1.71<br />
T4 50% RDN trough fertilizer + 50% 40.36 8.77 13.34 39.66 1.75<br />
B:C ratio<br />
Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming,<br />
INM, soil-microorganisms-plant interactions<br />
509 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
RDN through compost<br />
T5 50% RDN through fertilizer + 25%<br />
RDN through compost<br />
T6 25% RDN through fertilizer + 50%<br />
RDN through compost<br />
T7 50% RDN through fertilizer + 25%<br />
RDN through compost + Rhizobium<br />
ciceri<br />
T8 25% RDN through fertilizer + 50%<br />
RDN through compost + Rhizobium<br />
ciceri<br />
T9 50% RDN through fertilizer + 50%<br />
RDN through compost + Rhizobium<br />
cicericicero<br />
39.56 8.43 13.75 38.00 1.73<br />
39.37 8.07 12.95 38.21 1.61<br />
40.22 9.50 14.87 38.98 1.84<br />
40.62 9.69 14.33 40.34 1.85<br />
42.06 11.06 15.48 41.29 2.02<br />
S.Em + 0.32 0.54 0.59 0.44<br />
C.D. at 5% 0.92 1.58 1.71 1.29<br />
T4-30P-1259<br />
Effect <strong>of</strong> Integrated Nutrient Management on the Growth and Yield <strong>of</strong> Mustard (Brassica<br />
Juncea (L.) Czernj. & Cosson) Under Guava (Psidium Guajaval.) based Agri-Horti System<br />
Miryala Sushma, J.P. Singh, SudhirKumar Rajpoot and Rajnish Pandey<br />
Banaras Hindu university Varanasi (UP)-221 005 India<br />
The importance and potential <strong>of</strong> rapeseed-mustard crop is well known as it is the key oilseed<br />
crop that can help in addressing the challenge <strong>of</strong> demand - supply gap <strong>of</strong> edible oil in India. India<br />
is the third largest producer <strong>of</strong> rapeseed-mustard after Canada, China and contributing to around<br />
11 % <strong>of</strong> world’s total production. Rapeseed-mustard are the second largest oilseed crops in India.<br />
In India, during 2019-20, it was grown on 6.86 million hectares with an annual production <strong>of</strong><br />
9.12 million tonnes yielding 1331 kgha -1 . Rapeseed and mustard productivity in India has risen<br />
considerably in the last eight years, from 1840 kg ha -1 in 2010-11 to 1980 kg ha -1 in 2018-19,<br />
with production jumping from 61.64 m t in 2010-11 to 72.42 m t in 2018-19. For the crop year<br />
2019-20, India's average output was 1.4 t ha -1 . Inappropriate application <strong>of</strong> chemical fertilisers<br />
degrades soil characteristics and reduces crop output.These compounds have extremely<br />
dangerous side effects, including changes in soil structure and texture, unbalanced nutrient<br />
supply to plants, pollution <strong>of</strong> land and water bodies, and decreased soil microbial<br />
activity.Integrated nutrient management is a method <strong>of</strong> improving soil fertility and plant nutrient<br />
availability by combining the best inorganic and organic fertilisers with bi<strong>of</strong>ertilizers to ensure<br />
510 | Page Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming, INM, soilmicroorganisms-plant<br />
interactions
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
crop output for the present and future.Farmyard manure improves the soil's porosity, aggregate<br />
stability, and hydraulic conductivity in addition to adding organic matter.However, when these<br />
chemicals are mixed with organic fertilisers, a balanced nutrient system that influences crop<br />
production is established. In recent years, scholars and researchers have placed a greater<br />
emphasis on organic farming as opposed to regular agriculture because it is more<br />
environmentally friendly.<br />
Methodology<br />
A field experiment was therefore conducted to know the effect <strong>of</strong> integrated nutrient<br />
management on the growth and yield <strong>of</strong> mustard (Brassica juncea (L.) Czernj. & Cosson) under<br />
guava (Psidium guajava L.) based agri-horti system at Agriculture Research farm, Rajiv Gandhi<br />
south campus Banarshindu university, Barkachha, Mirzapur, Uttar Pradesh during the rabi<br />
season <strong>of</strong> 2021 -2022. The study was carried out in a Guava (Psidium guajava) orchard with 7m<br />
x 7m spacing. The experiment was laid out in RBD with three replications <strong>of</strong> a guava based agrihorti<br />
system (fruit based agro-forestry system). In this research, seeds are sown by broadcasting<br />
method and mixed the seeds with fine sand for uniform spacingand the plants spacing is about<br />
45cm×15cm. Based on the treatment wise applied fertilisers on the research plots.<br />
Results<br />
In the present experimentation, marked influences <strong>of</strong> the application <strong>of</strong> integrated nutrients<br />
mainly this application 75% RDF+22.5 kg S+ 3.7 kg Zn +2.5 ton/ha FYM+ two spray <strong>of</strong> nano<br />
urea , FYM and nano urea caused significant variation in all growth parameters and seed<br />
yield(1493.00 kg ha -1 ) and net return(147568 kg ha -1 ) followed by the application <strong>of</strong> 75%<br />
RDF+22.5 kg S+ 3.7 kg Zn +5 ton/ha FYM+ one spray <strong>of</strong> nano urea (1290.00 kg ha -1 ) and net<br />
return(13418 kg ha -1 ) and the lowest yield was recorded in treatment control (713.33 kg ha -1 ).<br />
similar to nitrogen uptake by seed and stover, maximum total nitrogen uptake (56.57 kg ha -1 )<br />
was recorded with 75% RDF+22.5 kg S+ 3.7 kg Zn +2.5 ton/ha FYM+ two spray <strong>of</strong> nano urea<br />
and followed by 75% RDF+22.5 kg S+ 3.7 kg Zn +5 ton/ha FYM+ one spray <strong>of</strong> nano urea (48.1<br />
kg ha -1 ) and lowest nitrogen uptake was noticed in treatment control (23.55 kg ha -1 ). similar to<br />
phosphorus maximum uptake was recorded with the treatment <strong>of</strong> 75% RDF+22.5 kg S+ 3.7 kg<br />
Zn +2.5 ton/ha FYM+ two spray <strong>of</strong> nano urea (15.01 kg ha -1 ) and control recorded minimum<br />
uptake (5.9 kg ha -1 ) similar to potassium uptake by seed and stover, application <strong>of</strong> 75%<br />
RDF+22.5 kg S+ 3.7 kg Zn +2.5 ton/ha FYM+ two spray <strong>of</strong> nano urea (42.82 kg ha -1 ) and lowest<br />
potassium uptake was recorded in treatment control (17.66 kg ha- 1 ). Similar to sulphur uptake by<br />
seed and stover, application <strong>of</strong> 75% RDF+22.5 kg S+ 3.7 kg Zn +2.5 ton/ha FYM+ two spray <strong>of</strong><br />
Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming,<br />
INM, soil-microorganisms-plant interactions<br />
511 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
nano urea (11.59 kg ha -1 ) treatment was significantly higher than other treatments. Control<br />
recorded minimum total sulphur uptake (3.41 kg ha -1 ) by crop.<br />
Effect <strong>of</strong> integrated nutrient management on the seed yield and N, P, K and S nutrient<br />
uptake <strong>of</strong> mustard under guava based agri-horti system<br />
Treatment<br />
Seed<br />
yield<br />
(kg ha -1 )<br />
N total<br />
uptake<br />
(kg ha -1 )<br />
P total<br />
uptake<br />
(kg ha -1 )<br />
K total<br />
uptake<br />
(kg ha -1 )<br />
S total<br />
uptake<br />
(kg ha -1 )<br />
Cost <strong>of</strong><br />
cultivation<br />
(Rs ha -1 )<br />
Net<br />
returns<br />
(Rs ha -1)<br />
T 1 Control 713.33 23.55 5.9 17.66 3.41 32073 102095<br />
T 2100% RDF+30kg<br />
S+ 5kg Zn<br />
T 3 50% RDF+15kg S+<br />
2.5 kg Zn +2.5 ton/ha<br />
FYM+ 2 Spray <strong>of</strong> Nano<br />
urea<br />
T 4 50% RDF+15kg S+<br />
2.5 kg Zn +5 ton/ha<br />
FYM+ 1 Spray <strong>of</strong> Nano<br />
urea<br />
T 5 75% RDF+22.5 kg<br />
S+ 3.7 kg Zn +2.5<br />
ton/ha FYM+ 2 Spray<br />
<strong>of</strong> Nano urea<br />
T 6 75% RDF+22.5 kg<br />
S+ 3.7 kg Zn +5 ton/ha<br />
FYM+ 1 Spray <strong>of</strong> Nano<br />
urea<br />
T 7 100%RDF+30kg S+<br />
5kg Zn+2.5 ton/ha FYM<br />
T 8 100%RDF+30kg S+<br />
5kg Zn+ 5 ton/ha FYM<br />
1076.00 37.56 9.52 30.22 5.97 37142 122242<br />
867.00 29.56 7.43 22.83 4.43 35482 108932<br />
970.00 33.44 8.54 25.55 5.02 35789 115435<br />
1493.00 56.57 15.01 42.82 11.59 38304 147568<br />
1290.00 48.1 12.71 37.48 9.33 38288 13418<br />
1173.33 41.32 10.78 33.34 7.43 37367 127364<br />
1236.33 44.06 11.72 35.46 8.54 38272 130626<br />
C.D (P=0.05) 142.37 3.595 0.937 2.809 0.655 - -<br />
512 | Page Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming, INM, soilmicroorganisms-plant<br />
interactions
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
T4-31P-1299<br />
Effect <strong>of</strong> Integrated Nutrient Management on System Yield, Sustainable Yield<br />
Index and Soil Properties in Maize-Based Cropping System<br />
Bikram Borkotoki, Palakshi Bora, Pallab Kumar Sarma, Nikhita Kakati, Nupur Kalita,<br />
Nikhilesh Baruah, Prasanta Neog, Rekhashree Kalita, Arunjyoti Sonowal and<br />
Buddha Bora<br />
All India Coordinated Research Project for Dryland Agriculture, BN College <strong>of</strong> Agriculture, Assam<br />
Agricultural University<br />
Indian agriculture remains predominantly rainfed, covering about 60% <strong>of</strong> the country's net sown<br />
area and 40% <strong>of</strong> the total food production (Agri Odisha,2022). These high-potential rainfed areas<br />
provide us with opportunities for faster agricultural growth than irrigated areas that have reached<br />
a plateau (Agricoop,2022). Therefore, a rainfed permanent manurial trial was conducted in the<br />
upland situation at the Biswanath Chariali Center <strong>of</strong> the All India Coordinated Research Project<br />
on Dry Land Agriculture (AICRPDA), India, situated in the North Bank Plain Zone (NBPZ) <strong>of</strong><br />
Assam in Maize-Green gram-Rajmah cropping sequence with the specific objectives <strong>of</strong><br />
identifying the suitable combination <strong>of</strong> inorganic and organic sources <strong>of</strong> nutrients for sustainable<br />
cropping system and soil health management in rainfed upland situations <strong>of</strong> Assam.<br />
Methodology<br />
The experiment was conducted with the following treatments in RBD during 2015-16 to 2019-20<br />
having a gap period during 2017-18 with three replications at the experimental farm <strong>of</strong><br />
AICRPDA (26°43'27"N and 93°08'32"E, Elevation 80 m above MSL), Biswanath Chariali<br />
Centre, Assam which an acidic upland sandy loam soil under the soil odder Inceptisols. Total<br />
rainfall in the growing season <strong>of</strong> the crops (Maize-Green gram-Rajmah) were 2071.4, 2111.4,<br />
1877.8 and 1671.6 mm in 2015-16, 2016-17,2018-19 and 2019-20, respectively. The treatments<br />
are T1: Control, T2: 100%Recommended dose <strong>of</strong> fertilizer (RDF), T3: 75% RDF (inorganic) + 3 t<br />
ha -1 Vermicompost* T4: 75% RDF (inorganic) + 1 t ha -1 vermicompost* , T5: 75% RDF<br />
(inorganic) + in situ Sesbania aculeata T6: 50% RDF (inorganic) + 3 t ha -1 vermicompost*, T7:<br />
50% RDF (inorganic) + 1 t ha -1 vermicompost*, T8: 50% RDF (inorganic) + in situ Sesbania<br />
aculeata, T9: 3 t ha -1 vermicompost, T10: 1 t ha -1 vermicompost and T11: In situ Sesbania<br />
aculeata. (* In each crop)<br />
The first crop, Maize (Var. Hybrid-101), was sown in April and harvested within the first week<br />
<strong>of</strong> August. The second crop, Greengram (var. SG-1), was sown before mid-September and<br />
Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming,<br />
INM, soil-microorganisms-plant interactions<br />
513 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
harvested within Nov. The last crop Rajmah (HUR 301), was sown in the month <strong>of</strong> mid-Dec and<br />
harvested at the end <strong>of</strong> March in all the years. Surface soils (0-15 cm) were analyzed for soil<br />
Physico-chemical properties after the 4 th year sequence was conducted following stranded<br />
procedures (Jackson,1967; Dane and Top,2002). Soil microbial biomass carbon (MBC) was<br />
analyzed by chlor<strong>of</strong>orm fumigation extraction method (Vance et al., 1987).<br />
Results<br />
Four years <strong>of</strong> pooled data reveal that the highest system yield was recorded in T3(140.31q ha - 1 ),<br />
followed by T6 (127.94 q ha -1 ) and T4 (122.15 q ha -1 ), and the lowest in control T1 (70.33 q ha -1 )<br />
with corresponding B: C ratios 3.14,2.79, 2.88 and 1.81, respectively. Similarly, pooled system<br />
RWUE (kg ha -1 cm -1 ) was also found to be highest in T3 (7.34), followed by T6 (6.68) and T4<br />
(6.42), and the lowest was in control (3.69). The data was heterogeneous at a 5% significance<br />
level, and therefore transformations were made before performing pooled analysis. In<br />
transformed data also, highest system yield was found in T3 (25.971 q ha -1 ), followed by T6<br />
(23.602 q ha -1 ) which is at par with T4 (22.673 q ha -1 ) with CD values <strong>of</strong> 2.293 at a 0.05 level <strong>of</strong><br />
significance. Manure addition improved soil physical, chemical, and biological properties<br />
(discussed under the head 'soil properties), which is reflected in the system yield. Nevertheless,<br />
the Integrated supply <strong>of</strong> nutrients gave better results than sole chemical or organic management<br />
systems. The sustainable yield index was highest in T3 (0.92), followed by T6 (0.86), T4(0.77)<br />
and T7 (0.75), and the lowest was in control (0.46), indicating that the system in more sustainable<br />
when 75% RDF + 3 t vermicompost ha -1 was applied in each crop followed by 50% RDF+ 3 t<br />
vermicompost ha -1 in each crop, followed by 75% RDF +1 t vermicompost ha -1 in each crop<br />
followed by 50 % RDF+ 1 t ha -1 vermicompost in each crop.<br />
Sustainable Yield index<br />
514 | Page Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming, INM, soilmicroorganisms-plant<br />
interactions
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Effect <strong>of</strong> treatments on soil properties:<br />
a) FC, AWC, and PWP: The highest field capacity moisture content was observed in T3<br />
(26.60%), followed by T6 (25.73%) and T4 (25.44%), and the lowest was in control<br />
T1(24.28) at CD value 0.366 at 0.05 level <strong>of</strong> significance. However, moisture content at<br />
FC in T4 and T6 was non-significant. Similarly, the highest available water content was<br />
found in T3 (20.27%), followed by T6(19.03%) and T4 (18.83%), and the lowest was in<br />
control T1(17.83%) with CD value 0.530 at a 0.05 level <strong>of</strong> significance. However,<br />
moisture content at AWC in T4 and T6 was statistically at par. The moisture content at<br />
PWP was at par for all the treatments.<br />
b) Bulk Density: The lowest bulk density was recorded in T3 (1.21 Mgm -3 ), followed by T6<br />
(1.25 Mgm -3 ) and T4(1.27 Mgm -3 ), and the highest was in control T1(1.35 Mgm -3 ) with<br />
CD value 0.02 at 0.05 level <strong>of</strong> significance. However, T4 and T6 were found to be at par.<br />
c) Soil reaction: The highest pH was recorded in T3 (4.6), followed by T6 (4.54), and the<br />
lowest was in T2 (4.41) with CD 0.13 at 0.05 level <strong>of</strong> significance.<br />
d) Oxidizable Organic Carbon: The oxidizable organic carbon was found to be highest in T3<br />
(8.93 g kg -1 ), followed by T6(8.57 g kg -1 ), and the lowest was in control T1(7.30 g kg -1 )<br />
with CD value 0.14 at 0.05 level <strong>of</strong> significance<br />
e) Available N: The highest available N was found in T3(433.34 kg ha -1 ), followed by T4<br />
(426.50 kg ha -1 ), T6 (421.40 kg ha -1 ), and the lowest was in the control T1 (296.97 kg ha -<br />
1 ) with CD value 8.17 at 0.05 level <strong>of</strong> significance. T4 and T6 were statistically at par.<br />
f) Available P2O5: The highest available P2O5 was found in T3 (26.37 kg ha -1 ), followed by<br />
T4 (24.98 kg ha -1 ), T6 (24.20 kg ha -1 ), and the lowest was in control T1 (16.70 kg ha -1 )<br />
with CD value 0.91 at 0.05 level <strong>of</strong> significance. T4 and T6 were statistically at par.<br />
Effect <strong>of</strong> Treatments on Soil Microbial Biomass Carbon (MBC): The highest level <strong>of</strong> MBC<br />
was restored in T3(243.29 mg kg -1 ), followed by T4(228.62 mg kg -1 ), T6 (227.51 mg kg -1 ) and the<br />
lowest was recorded in T1(145.15 mg kg -1 ) with CD value 14.18 at 0.05 level <strong>of</strong> significance. T4<br />
and T6 were found to be statistically at par. A perusal <strong>of</strong> soil properties indicates the positive<br />
effect <strong>of</strong> Integrated Nutrient Management (INM) on soil health compared to sole organic or<br />
chemical-intensive farming.<br />
Carbon dioxide sequestration: CO2 sequestration <strong>of</strong> the surface soil was found to be highest in<br />
T3 and the lowest in T1<br />
Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming,<br />
INM, soil-microorganisms-plant interactions<br />
515 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Conclusion<br />
CO2 sequestration (t ha -1 ) <strong>of</strong> surface soils under different nutrient management systems<br />
From the above research, it can be concluded that 75% RDF + 3 t ha -1 vermicompost (in each<br />
crop) gives the highest system yield and B: C rations and sustainable yield index in Maize-<br />
Greengram- Rajmah cropping sequence in the rainfed upland situation <strong>of</strong> the NBPZ <strong>of</strong> Assam<br />
followed by 50 % RDF + 3 t ha -1 vermicompost (in each crop) which is at par with 75% RDF +<br />
1 t ha -1 vermicompost (in each crop) in terms <strong>of</strong> yield performance. However, in terms <strong>of</strong> the B:<br />
C ratio, the application <strong>of</strong> 75% RDF + 1 t ha -1 vermicompost (in each crop) is more beneficial<br />
than 50 % RDF + 3 t ha -1 vermicompost (in each crop). INM gave a better yield and soil health<br />
management result than chemical fertilization and control or sole organic cultivation <strong>of</strong> the<br />
crops. The SYI was highest, with 75 percent <strong>of</strong> the recommended dose <strong>of</strong> fertilizers with 3 t ha -1<br />
vermicompost in each crop.<br />
References<br />
Agri Odisha.2022 Website <strong>of</strong> the Department <strong>of</strong> Agriculture and Farmers' Empowerment, Govt <strong>of</strong> Odisha,<br />
accessed on 20th Oct 2022. https://agri.odisha.gov.in/sites/default/files/2021-08/RAD.pdf<br />
Agricoop.2022 Website <strong>of</strong> the Department <strong>of</strong> Agriculture and Farmers Welfare, Ministry <strong>of</strong> Agriculture<br />
and Farmers’ Welfare Govt <strong>of</strong> India, assessed on 20 th Oct 2022<br />
https://agricoop.nic.in/en/divisiontype/rainfed-farming-system/overview<br />
Dane, J.H. and Topp, G.C. (Eds.) 2002. Methods <strong>of</strong> Soil Analysis, Part 4, Physical Methods. Soil Science<br />
Society <strong>of</strong> America <strong>Book</strong> Series, No. 5, Soil Science Society <strong>of</strong> America, Madison, 1692: 98<br />
Jackson, M.L. 1967. Soil Chemical Analysis. Prentice-Hall <strong>of</strong> India Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi, 4<br />
Vance, P., Brookes, D. Jenkinson. 1987. An extraction method for measuring soil microbial biomass C,<br />
Soil Biol. Biochem. (19): 703-707<br />
516 | Page Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming, INM, soilmicroorganisms-plant<br />
interactions
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
T4-32P-1310<br />
Soil Microbial Dynamics as Influenced By Crop Residue Management<br />
Practices In Legume-Cereal Sequence<br />
Ammaji Pydi<br />
Acharya N.G. Ranga Agricultural University<br />
Agricultural College, Rajamahendravaram<br />
India has a long history <strong>of</strong> agricultural activitiesand produces a vast amount <strong>of</strong> crop residues, the<br />
annual production <strong>of</strong> crop residues in India is estimated over 500 million tons (Mt). There exists<br />
a large variability among the crops with regard to the production <strong>of</strong> crop residues. Furthermore,<br />
residueproductionhasalsoincreasedsubstantiallywith intensive agricultural practicesTheseinclude<br />
organic matter decomposition and nutrient cycling, including carbon(C) and nitrogen (N) cycling<br />
and soil aggregate formation and maintenance. Furthermore, the size <strong>of</strong> the microbial population<br />
in agricultural soils can be affected bythe availability<strong>of</strong> organic matter and<br />
managementpractices.<br />
The legume-Maize sequence is animportant cropping system followed in a large extent <strong>of</strong> area<br />
in Andhra Pradesh and Telangana states. Grain legumes were cultivated during the<br />
Kharifseason and after harvesting the economic yield the harvested remnants are either used as<br />
animal feed or else burned to clear the succeeding crop. Maize is an exhaustive crop for<br />
nutrients and responds positively toan increase in the level <strong>of</strong> nitrogen fertilizers. Furthermore,<br />
Intensive agricultural practices ignorethe addition <strong>of</strong> organicnutrient sourcesresulting in the<br />
manifestation <strong>of</strong> nutrient deficiencies. T<strong>of</strong>ormulate an ideal nutrient management strategy to<br />
increase the yields and sustain soil health, an attempt was made to know the soil microbial<br />
dynamics <strong>of</strong>with incorporation <strong>of</strong> crop residues in the legume- Maize sequence<br />
Methodology<br />
A field experiments were conducted at Agricultural College farm, Aswaraopet, Khammam<br />
(Dist.) Telangana state for two consecutive years. The investigation was carried out with an<br />
objective to find out microbial dynamics as influenced by the crop residue incorporation <strong>of</strong><br />
kharif legumes, residue management practices and the treatments consisted <strong>of</strong> three legumes,<br />
viz., cowpea, (M1) field bean (M2) and greengram (M3) as main plot treatments during the kharif<br />
season and two residue management practices viz., residue removal (I1) and residue<br />
incorporation (I2) as sub- plot treatments. Four nitrogen levels 75 kg ha -1 (N1), 150 kg ha -1 (N2), 225<br />
kg ha -1 (N3) and 300 kg ha -1 (N4) as sub- sub plot treatments allocated to maize during rabi season.<br />
Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming,<br />
INM, soil-microorganisms-plant interactions<br />
517 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
The yield <strong>of</strong> kharif legumes, growth parameters, yield and yield attributes <strong>of</strong> rabi maize were<br />
recorded. The soil samples were collected from the experimental plots for enumerating the<br />
microbial population before sowing and after harvest <strong>of</strong> different legumes, after incorporation <strong>of</strong><br />
the crop residues, before sowing <strong>of</strong> maize and after harvest <strong>of</strong> maize was estimated by following<br />
the standard dilution plate count technique by pour plate technique Nutrient agar (NA) for<br />
bacteria, Martin’s rose bengal with streptomycin sulphate agar (MRBA) for fungi, Ashby’s agar<br />
for Azotobacter, Yeast Extract Mannitol agar (YEMA) with congo red for Rhizobium were used<br />
for enumeration. The petri plates were incubated after plating at 30 0 C for two to four days and<br />
population was counted and expressed as number <strong>of</strong> cells per gram on dry weight basis for<br />
bacteria,Azotobacter and Rhizobium and cfu g -1 <strong>of</strong> soil for fungi.<br />
Results<br />
Soil microbial population as affected by different management practices<br />
Soil microbial population was assessed at three stages viz., initial, after the harvest <strong>of</strong> the kharif<br />
legumes as well as after the incorporation <strong>of</strong> legumes and after the harvest <strong>of</strong> the rabi maize. On<br />
perusal <strong>of</strong> the data presented in the figure below revealed that there was an increase in microbial<br />
population compared to the initial population during both the years <strong>of</strong> study. Improvement in soil<br />
microbial population viz., total bacteria, rhizobium, azotobacter, actinomycetes and fungi was<br />
observed over the initial population when legumes were grown in kharif.<br />
Among the legumes, maximum number <strong>of</strong> soil micro flora was observed after the harvest <strong>of</strong><br />
cowpea followed by field bean and greengram. The increase in number <strong>of</strong> soil microorganisms<br />
might be due to the abundance <strong>of</strong> the native bacteria in the soil. Similar results were also<br />
reported by George et al. (2007).<br />
518 | Page Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming, INM, soilmicroorganisms-plant<br />
interactions
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Soil microbial population as affected by different legume crops<br />
250<br />
200<br />
150<br />
100<br />
50<br />
0<br />
Total bacterial<br />
count (x 104 g-1<br />
<strong>of</strong> soil)<br />
Rhizobium<br />
count (x 104 <strong>of</strong><br />
soil)<br />
azotobacter<br />
count (x 104 g-1<br />
<strong>of</strong> soil)<br />
Actinomycetes<br />
(X 104 g-1 <strong>of</strong><br />
soil)<br />
fungal count (x<br />
104*cfu g-1<strong>of</strong><br />
soil)<br />
Initial Cowpea Fieldbean Greengram<br />
Soil microbial population as influenced by different types <strong>of</strong> legume crops<br />
Soil incorporation <strong>of</strong> legume crop residues has further improved the microbial population by two<br />
folds during first year. The maximum number <strong>of</strong> bacteria and 352 X 10 4 g -1 ) was noticed with<br />
incorporation <strong>of</strong> cowpea residues as depicted in the figure below. The improvement in soil<br />
microbial population might be due to the addition <strong>of</strong> all the residues which might have added a<br />
fair quantity <strong>of</strong> organic matter to the soil which inturn acted as a substrate for the multiplication<br />
and development <strong>of</strong> microbes either over the initial or against the residue removal during both<br />
the years.<br />
Soil microbial population as influenced by residue management practices<br />
The decreasing in trend in the entire micro flora was noticed after the harvest <strong>of</strong> rabi maize<br />
during both the years by maintaining more or less similar trend as that was observed in the initial<br />
as well as at the end <strong>of</strong> harvest <strong>of</strong> kharif crops. Increase in microbial population was seen with<br />
Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming,<br />
INM, soil-microorganisms-plant interactions<br />
519 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
the incorporation <strong>of</strong> crop residues over the removal. Further increase in microbial count was<br />
observed due to increase in level <strong>of</strong> N application. The highest total bacterial count <strong>of</strong> 333<br />
X10 4 g -1 and 352 X10 4 g -1 <strong>of</strong> soil was recorded with incorporation <strong>of</strong> cowpea crop residues with<br />
N application at 300 kg ha -1 . While the lowest count <strong>of</strong> total bacteria 61 X10 4 g -1 and 91 X10 4 g -1<br />
in first and second year, respectively was obtained in greengram with N application at 75 kg ha -1<br />
in removal <strong>of</strong> greengram residue treatments. The changes in the population <strong>of</strong> microbes in<br />
different cropping systems and sequences were well established by Yadvinder Singh et al.<br />
(2005).<br />
References<br />
George, N., Chemining, wa, Muthomi, J. W. andTheuri, S. W. M. 2007. Effect <strong>of</strong> Rhizobia<br />
inoculation and starter N on nodulation, shoot biomass and yield <strong>of</strong> grain legumes. Asian<br />
J. Plant Sci. 6(7): 1113-1118.<br />
Yadvinder Singh, Bijaysingh. and Timsina. 2005. Crop residue management for nutrient cycling<br />
and improving the soil production in rice-based cropping systems. Adv.Agron.8<br />
T4-33P-1313<br />
Response <strong>of</strong> Sweet Corn (Zea maysL.var. saccharatasturt) to Integrated<br />
Nutrient Management under Rainfed Condition<br />
P.N. Karanjikar, S.R. Kadhavane and V.G. Takankhar<br />
College <strong>of</strong> Agriculture, Latur- 413 512, Vasantrao Naik Marathwada Agricultural University, Parbhani,<br />
Maharashtra (India)<br />
The cereal, maize (Zea mays L.) ranks third in the total production after wheat and rice and it is a<br />
staple food in many countries, particularly in the tropics and subtropics. Maize is considered as<br />
the “Queen <strong>of</strong> Cereal”. Maize is a versatile product with uses ranging from industrial products to<br />
food preparations, as well as direct human consumption at the vegetative stage. Out <strong>of</strong> various<br />
specialty corns, sweet corn is a mutant type with one or more recessive alleles in homozygous<br />
condition that enable the endosperm to accumulate twice the sugar content as that <strong>of</strong> seed corn.<br />
Sweet corn is a exhaustive crop and it is harvested at milky stage and requires fertile soils for<br />
optimum production.<br />
Amongst various agricultural inputs, fertilizer is and will remain as a chief source in achieving<br />
the food production targets. For higher productivity, there is a need for the application <strong>of</strong> higher<br />
dose <strong>of</strong> fertilizers. But the increased application <strong>of</strong> high analysis fertilizers and use <strong>of</strong> high<br />
yielding cultivars demanding more secondary and micro nutrients for enhancing food grain<br />
520 | Page Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming, INM, soilmicroorganisms-plant<br />
interactions
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
production which resulted in their deficiencies. The integrated plant nutrient supply envisages<br />
conjunctive use <strong>of</strong> inorganic and organic sources <strong>of</strong> plant nutrients for crop productivity besides<br />
sustaining soil health. Application <strong>of</strong> organic materials along with inorganic fertilizers in the soil<br />
leads to sustained productivity and also vermicomposting technology involves the bioconversion<br />
<strong>of</strong> organic waste into vermicasts and vermiwash utilizing earthworms. Taking in to<br />
consideration the factors discussed, present investigation was carried out at Experimental Farm,<br />
Department <strong>of</strong> Agronomy, College <strong>of</strong> Agriculture, Latur with object to study the effect <strong>of</strong><br />
integrated nutrient management on sweet corn.<br />
Methodology<br />
The experiment was laid out in a randomized block design with seven treatments and replicated<br />
thrice. The treatments were T1- 100% RDF, T2 - 100% RDF + FYM @ 5 t ha -1 , T3 - 75% RDF<br />
+ FYM @ 5 t ha -1 , T4 - 100% RDF + Vermicompost @ 2.5 t ha -1 , T5 - 75% RDF +<br />
Vermicompost @ 2.5 t ha -1 , T6 - 100% RDF + FYM @ 5 t ha -1 + Vermicompost @ 1.25 t ha -1 +<br />
Azospirillumand T7 -75% RDF + FYM @ 5 t ha -1 + Vermicompost @ 1.25 t ha -1 +<br />
Azospirillum.The soil <strong>of</strong> experimental plot was clayey in texture with chemical composition<br />
such as low in available nitrogen (125.3 kg ha -1 ), medium in available phosphorous (18.20 kg ha -<br />
1 ) and very high in available potassium (498.58 kg ha -1 ). The soil was moderately alkaline in<br />
reaction having pH (7.7). The sweet corn hybrid Sugar- 75 was sown on 1 st August, 2019 at<br />
distance <strong>of</strong> 60 cm x 30 cm apart. Organic manures viz., FYM and vermicompost were applied to<br />
the respective plots fifteen days before sowing. The Bi<strong>of</strong>ertilizer Azospirillum obtained from the<br />
Bi<strong>of</strong>ertilizers Production Unit, VNMK, Parbhani was applied one day before sowing @ 10 ml<br />
kg -1 . As per treatments, half dose <strong>of</strong> nitrogenous fertilizers and full dose <strong>of</strong> phosphatic and<br />
potassic fertilizers were applied. The FYM and vermicompost was applied uniformly to all the<br />
plots as per treatments. The next half dose <strong>of</strong> nitrogen fertilizer was applied in bands as top<br />
dressing one month after sowing. The rainfall received during the experimentation was 631.8<br />
mm.<br />
Results<br />
The result revealed that the application <strong>of</strong> 100% RDF + FYM @ 5 t ha -1 + Vermicompost @<br />
1.25 t ha -1 +Azospirillumsignificantly increased the growth characters viz., plant height (200 cm),<br />
number <strong>of</strong> functional leaves (17.60), dry matter accumulation (128.33 g), leaf area (76.35 dm 2 ).<br />
Similar results were also reported by Jadhav and Shelke (2012), Kurneet al., (2012) and Thorat<br />
(2016). The yield attributes namely length <strong>of</strong> cob (33.02 cm), girth <strong>of</strong> cob (23.33 cm), number <strong>of</strong><br />
kernel row cob -1 (16.83), number <strong>of</strong> kernel cob -1 (783.33), total weight <strong>of</strong> cob plant -1 (387.40 g),<br />
Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming,<br />
INM, soil-microorganisms-plant interactions<br />
521 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
green cob yield (10621 Kg ha -1 ) and green fodder yield (21824 Kg ha -1 ) <strong>of</strong> sweet corn were<br />
significantly highest with the application <strong>of</strong> 100% RDF + FYM @ 5 t ha -1 + Vermicompost @<br />
1.25 t ha -1 + Azospirillum. Similar findings were also noted by Jadhav and Shelke (2012) and<br />
Kurneet al., (2012) and Thorat (2016).<br />
References<br />
Jadhav, V.T. and Shelke, D. K. 2012. Effect <strong>of</strong> planting methods and fertilizer levels on growth, yield and<br />
economics <strong>of</strong> maize (Zea mays L.) Hybrids. J. Agric. Res. Tech., 37(1): 011-014.<br />
Kurne, R.A., Jadhav, Y. R. and Mohite, A. B. 2017. Effect <strong>of</strong> fertilizer levels and plant densities on<br />
growth, productivity and economics <strong>of</strong> sweet corn in summer season. Contemp. Res. India, 7(3):<br />
2231-2237.<br />
Thorat, K. S. 2016. Response <strong>of</strong> sweet corn to different fertilizers levels and spacing in kharif season.<br />
Thesis submitted for M.Sc. (Agri.) degree to Vasantarao Naik Marathwada Krishi Vidyapeeth,<br />
Parabhani<br />
Mean plant height (cm), No. <strong>of</strong> leaves plant -1 , dry matter (g) plant -1 , No. <strong>of</strong> cobs plant -1 ,<br />
length <strong>of</strong> cob (cm), girth <strong>of</strong> cob (cm), No. <strong>of</strong> kernel row cob -1 <strong>of</strong> sweet corn as influenced by<br />
Treatments<br />
different treatments at harvest<br />
plant<br />
height<br />
(cm)<br />
No. <strong>of</strong> leaves<br />
plant -1<br />
Dry<br />
matter<br />
No. <strong>of</strong><br />
cob<br />
plant -1<br />
Length<br />
<strong>of</strong> cob<br />
T 1-100% RDF 171.67 14.67 107.4 1 27.81<br />
T 2 - 100% RDF + FYM @ 5 t ha -1 173.67 14.93 110.1 1 28.52<br />
T 3 -75% RDF + FYM @ 5 t ha -1 159.33 13.37 98.03 1 25<br />
(g)<br />
(cm)<br />
T 4 -100% RDF + Vermicompost @ 2.5 t<br />
ha -1<br />
T 5 -75% RDF + Vermicompost @ 2.5 t<br />
ha -1<br />
T 6 -100% RDF + FYM @ 5 t ha -1 +<br />
Vermicompost @ 1.25 t ha -1<br />
+Azospirillum<br />
185 15.07 111.37 1 29.5<br />
166.67 13.93 100.13 1 27.33<br />
200 17.6 128.33 1.17 33.02<br />
T 7 -75% RDF + FYM @ 5 t ha -1 +<br />
Vermicompost@ 1.25 t ha -1<br />
+Azospirillum<br />
194 15.87 116.67 1.1 30.27<br />
SE± 8.37 0.74 5.33 0.17 1.35<br />
CD at 5% 25.78 2.29 16.42 NS 4.17<br />
522 | Page Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming, INM, soilmicroorganisms-plant<br />
interactions
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
T4-34P-1323<br />
Effect <strong>of</strong> Sulphur Levels and Spacings on Growth and Yield <strong>of</strong> Linseed (Linum Usitatissium<br />
L.) under VertisolsIn Rainfed Situation <strong>of</strong> Marathwada Region<br />
V. B. Awasarmal, Khazi G. S., Shikari A. R. and A.H. Nanher<br />
Department <strong>of</strong> Agronomy, College <strong>of</strong> Agriculture, Vasantrao Naik Marathwada Krishi Vidyapeeth,<br />
Parbhani – 431402, Maharashtra<br />
Linseed (Linum usitatissimum L.) is one <strong>of</strong> the oldest rabi oilseed crop under cultivation.<br />
Linseed is cool weather loving crop grown either as sole crop or mixed crop. The productivity <strong>of</strong><br />
linseed in Maharashtra is low due to cultivation under residual soil moisture, no input condition,<br />
utera system <strong>of</strong> cropping and major linseed growing areas are under moisture stress situation and<br />
protected irrigation facilities not available. To meet the requirement <strong>of</strong> growing population, it is<br />
necessary to increase the productivity <strong>of</strong> the crop and nutrient management is one <strong>of</strong> the answers<br />
to this issue. (Chaudhary2009). The main reason for low productivity <strong>of</strong> linseed is its cultivation<br />
in marginal and sub marginal lands under poor management and input starved rainfed conditions.<br />
Further lack <strong>of</strong> balanced nutrient management is one <strong>of</strong> the major causes <strong>of</strong> low yield.<br />
Methodology<br />
The experiment was conducted at Agricultural Research Farm, Department <strong>of</strong> Agronomy,<br />
College <strong>of</strong> Agriculture Parbhani, Maharashtra duringRabi season <strong>of</strong> 2020. The soil <strong>of</strong> the<br />
experimental plot was clayey in texture and slightly alkaline in reaction having low in organi<br />
ccarbon, available nitrogen and phosphorus, but marginally high in available potassium.<br />
Experiment was conducted in Split plot design with three replications. The treatments were<br />
consisting <strong>of</strong> four spacing as main plot treatments and three sulphur levels as sub plot treatments.<br />
The treatments are T1–30×15cm 2 , T2–30 ×10cm 2 , T3–45 ×10cm 2 , T4–45 ×15cm 2 , S1–0,S2–<br />
10Kgha -1 S3–20Kgha -1 .<br />
Results<br />
Results revealed that the mean growth attributes <strong>of</strong> linseed was significantlyobserved under the<br />
treatment T2 (30cm x10cm) while minimum growth characters was<br />
recordedundertreatmentT4(45cmx15cm). In case <strong>of</strong> Sulphur levels maximum observations<br />
pertaining to growth was recorded in treatmentS3 where 20 kg sulphur per ha was applied. It was<br />
significantly superior over rest<strong>of</strong> the treatments.<br />
Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming,<br />
INM, soil-microorganisms-plant interactions<br />
523 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Seed, Straw, Biological yield and Harvest Index <strong>of</strong> linseed as influenced by different<br />
treatments<br />
Treatments<br />
Seed yield<br />
(kgha -1 )<br />
Straw yield<br />
(kgha -1 )<br />
Biological<br />
yield (kgha -1 )<br />
Harvest<br />
Index<br />
(%)<br />
Spacings(cm)<br />
T1:30cmx15cm 927.40 1759.11 2686.51 34.52<br />
T2:30cmx10cm 1022.13 1920.14 2942.27 34.74<br />
T3:45cmx10cm 789.65 1527.49 2317.14 34.07<br />
T4:45cmx15cm 683.72 1464.23 2147.95 31.83<br />
SE± 86.41 120.91 239.21 --<br />
CDat5% 211.46 220.87 585.28 --<br />
Sulphurlevels(kgha -1 )<br />
S1:0 619.44 1284.78 1904.22 32.5<br />
S2:10kgha 856.61 1683.34 2539.95 33.72<br />
S3:20kgha 1091.14 2087.63 3178.77 34.32<br />
SE± 77.97 128.14 258.58 --<br />
CDat5% 233.76 384.17 615.23 --<br />
Interaction (TXS)<br />
SE± 119.61 181.91 363.92 --<br />
CDat5% NS NS NS --<br />
GM 855.72 1685.66 2530.97 33.67<br />
Data on seed, straw, biological yields and Harvest index as influenced byvarious treatments. The<br />
differences in seed, straw andbiological yield due to various treatments were significant and the<br />
mean seed, straw, biological yields and harvest index were 855.72 kg ha -1 ,1685.66 kg ha -1 ,<br />
2530.97kgha -1 and 33.67% respectively. Among different spacing data on yield revealed that the<br />
treatment T2 (30cm x10 cm) produced significantly highest seed yield whichwas found at par<br />
with treatment T1 (30cm x15cm) than rest <strong>of</strong> the treatments.Significantly highest yield was<br />
recorded with the application <strong>of</strong> 20 kgsulphurha -1 thanrest<strong>of</strong>thetreatmentsi.e.S1 (control) and S2<br />
(10kgha -1 ).Increasein seed yield with increase in sulphur level was might be due to the reason<br />
that Sulphur was involved in the formation <strong>of</strong> chlorophyll, which promotes photosynthesis and<br />
activation <strong>of</strong> enzyme; Sulphur application has been reported to favor yield due to proper<br />
partitioning <strong>of</strong> photo syntheses from source to sink (Singh2016).<br />
524 | Page Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming, INM, soilmicroorganisms-plant<br />
interactions
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
References<br />
Chaudhary, S. 2009. Study <strong>of</strong> row spacings for different varieties <strong>of</strong> Linseed (Linum usitatissium<br />
L.). Int. J. Plant Sci., 4 (2):373-374.<br />
Singh, P.K. 2016. Status paper on Linseed/ Flax agriculture. In Omega-3 fatty acids, Springer,<br />
Cham. 21-44.<br />
T4-35P-1328<br />
Growth and Yield <strong>of</strong> Soybean as Influenced by Foliar Application <strong>of</strong> Growth<br />
Regulators, Seaweed Extract and Potassium Nitrate<br />
J. D. Kalambe * , G. A. Bhalerao, S.S . Kinge and P.B. Kale<br />
VNMKV Parbhani, India. 431402<br />
* jyotikalambe95@gmail.com<br />
Soybean is a short season leguminous crop that grows in a warm climate with intermediate to<br />
heavy rainfall. Soybean, a wonder legume has high nutritive value and has manifold uses in<br />
agriculture, medicine and industrial sector. Sea weed extract is a new generation <strong>of</strong> natural<br />
organic fertilizers containing highly effective nutrition’s and promotes faster germination <strong>of</strong><br />
seeds and increase yield and resistance ability <strong>of</strong> many crops. Seaweed is richest <strong>of</strong> mineral<br />
elements containing calcium, magnesium, potassium, chlorine, sulphur, phosphorous, iodine,<br />
zinc, copper. Liquid fertilizers derived from natural sources like seaweeds are found to be viable<br />
alternatives to fertilizing input for agricultural crops due to its high level <strong>of</strong> organic matter, micro<br />
and macro elements, fatty acid and growth hormones, (Jensen 1993; Noda 1990). The yield <strong>of</strong><br />
soybean can be enhanced through physiological growth manipulation by way <strong>of</strong> foliar<br />
application <strong>of</strong> seaweed extract. The foliar application <strong>of</strong> growth regulators, seaweed extract and<br />
potassium nitrate at flowering and pod developing stage significantly increased the growth and<br />
yield contributing characters <strong>of</strong> soybean. Therefore, attempts were made to study the growth and<br />
yield <strong>of</strong> soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merrill) as influenced by foliar application <strong>of</strong> growth<br />
regulators, seaweed extract and potassium nitrate.<br />
Methodology<br />
The field experiment was conducted during kharif 2018 at experimental farm, Department <strong>of</strong><br />
Agronomy, College <strong>of</strong> Agriculture, VNMKV, Parbhani. The experiment consisted <strong>of</strong> seven<br />
treatments viz., Salicylic acid-50ppm (T1), GA3-100ppm (T2), Nitrobenzene-400ppm (T3), NAA-<br />
20ppm (T4), Seaweed extract- 400 ppm (T5), Potassium nitrate-2% (T6), Water spray (T7) and<br />
Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming,<br />
INM, soil-microorganisms-plant interactions<br />
525 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
two stages <strong>of</strong> application i.e. at the time <strong>of</strong> flowering and pod developing stage. The variety<br />
MAUS-71 was used and experiment was arranged in Randomized Block Design with three<br />
replications and comprised <strong>of</strong> 21-unit plots. The gross and net size <strong>of</strong> each plot was 5.4 m x 4.5<br />
m, 4.5 m x 4.0 m, respectively. Sowing was done on 1 st July, 2018 by dibbling one seed per hill<br />
at a recommended spacing <strong>of</strong> 45cm X 05cm.The recommended dose <strong>of</strong> fertilizer (30:60:30 kg<br />
NPK ha -1 ) was applied through Urea, Single super phosphate (SSP), Muriate <strong>of</strong> potash (MOP) as<br />
a source <strong>of</strong> nitrogen, phosphorous, potassium, respectively. All the growth regulators, seaweed<br />
extract and potassium nitrate were applied in two sprayings as foliar spray, 1 st spraying at the<br />
time <strong>of</strong> flowering and 2 nd spraying at pod developing stage. The crop was harvested on 10 th<br />
October, 2018.<br />
Results<br />
Foliar application <strong>of</strong> different growth regulators, seaweed extract and potassium nitrate exposed<br />
variation on growth characteristics <strong>of</strong> soybean such as plant height, number <strong>of</strong> functional leaves,<br />
leaf area, number <strong>of</strong> branches, total dry matter accumulation. Among all the treatments<br />
application <strong>of</strong> treatment T5- Seaweed extract- 400 ppm to soybean crop at flowering and pod<br />
developing stage showed better result with respect to plant height (49.90cm), number <strong>of</strong><br />
functional leaves (23.57), leaf area (9.60 dm 2 ), number <strong>of</strong> branches (6.18), mean dry matter<br />
accumulation (16.73 g) and at par with treatment T2- GA3-100ppm and T1- Salicylic acid-50ppm.<br />
However lower values were recorded in treatment T7-Water spray.<br />
Yield<strong>of</strong> soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merrill) as influenced by foliar application <strong>of</strong> growth<br />
regulators, seaweed extract and potassium nitrate.<br />
Tr.<br />
No<br />
Treatments<br />
No. <strong>of</strong><br />
pods<br />
plant -1<br />
No. <strong>of</strong><br />
seeds<br />
plant -1<br />
Seed<br />
yield<br />
plant -1<br />
(g)<br />
Seed<br />
index<br />
(g)<br />
Seed<br />
yield kg<br />
ha -1<br />
Straw<br />
yield kg<br />
ha -1<br />
T 1 Salicylic Acid-50 ppm 29.09 68.50 5.70 8.90 2014 2877 42.03<br />
T 2 GA 3-100 ppm 30.29 70.90 6.20 9.39 2246 2943 43.28<br />
T 3 Nitrobenzene-400 ppm 27.05 63.30 5.12 8.37 1909 2661 41.78<br />
T 4 NAA-20 ppm 26.24 60.04 4.83 8.02 1821 2520 41.95<br />
T 5 Seaweed extract-400ppm 32.97 72.83 6.57 9.62 2307 3055 43.02<br />
T 6 KNO 3-2% 25.41 58.16 4.59 7.98 1722 2455 41.22<br />
T 7 Water spray 24.00 49.90 3.17 7.05 1509 2235 40.30<br />
S.E.(m) ± 1.61 2.94 0.37 0.50 111.91 155.63 -<br />
C.D. at 5% 4.96 9.07 1.14 NS 344.03 479.52 -<br />
General mean 27.86 63.38 5.17 8.44 1932.57 2678 42.04<br />
Harvest<br />
index<br />
%<br />
526 | Page Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming, INM, soilmicroorganisms-plant<br />
interactions
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
The foliar application <strong>of</strong> different growth regulators, seaweed extract and potassium nitrate<br />
showed variation on yield characteristics <strong>of</strong> soybean such as number <strong>of</strong> pods plant -1 , Number <strong>of</strong><br />
seeds plant -1 , Seed yield plant -1 (g), Seed index (g) (Weight <strong>of</strong> 100 seeds), Seed yield kg ha 1 ,<br />
Straw yield kg ha -1 , Harvest index %. Among all the treatments application <strong>of</strong> T5- seaweed<br />
extract-400 ppm significantly increased all the yield parameters except harvest index. The<br />
highest number <strong>of</strong> pods plant -1 (32.97), Number <strong>of</strong> seeds plant -1 (72.83), seed yield plant -1 (6.57<br />
g), seed index (9.62 g), seed yield (2307 kg ha 1 ), straw yield (3055 kg ha -1 ) were observed at<br />
seaweed extract-400ppm which was significantly higher over all the treatments but highest<br />
harvest index (43.28%) was observed in T2- GA3-100ppm, and was at par with treatment T2-<br />
GA3-100ppm and T1- Salicylic acid-50ppm. However lower values were recorded in treatment<br />
T7-Water spray. Similar trend <strong>of</strong> observation observed by Kavitha et al. (2008), Agwane and<br />
Parhe (2015), Satish Kumar et al. (2018).<br />
Conclusion<br />
One-year experiment was conducted on soybean crop with different application <strong>of</strong> growth<br />
regulators, seaweed extract and potassium nitrate during KHARIFseason 2018. Based on this<br />
field investigation the following conclusioncan be drawn. Foliar application <strong>of</strong> Seaweed extract -<br />
400 ppm at flowering and pod developing stage recorded highest growth parameters, yield<br />
attributes and seed yield having at par values with GA3 -100 ppm and Salicylic acid -50 ppm.<br />
From the above results and discussion, it may be concluded that, application <strong>of</strong> seaweed extract-<br />
400 ppm at flowering and pod developing stage would be promising practice for soybean growth<br />
and yield.<br />
References<br />
Agwane, R. B. and Parhe, S. D. 2015. Effect <strong>of</strong> seed priming on crop growth and seed yield <strong>of</strong> soybean (Glycine<br />
max L. Merrill). Bioscan 10: 265-270.<br />
Jensen. 1993. Presence and future needs for algal products. Hydrobiologia 261: 15-21.<br />
Kavitha, M. P., Ganeshraja, V. and Paulpandi, V. K. 2008. Effect <strong>of</strong> foliar spraying <strong>of</strong> sea weed extract on<br />
growth and yield <strong>of</strong> rice (Oryzasativa L.) Agric. Sci. Digest, 28(2): 127 - 129.<br />
Noda. 1990. Antitumour activity <strong>of</strong> marine algae. Hydrobiologia 204: 577-584.<br />
Satish Kumar, A. N., Sakthivel, E., Subramanian, R., Kalpana, P., Janaki. and Rajesh, P. 2018. Influence<br />
<strong>of</strong> foliar spray <strong>of</strong> nutrients and plant growth regulators on physiological attributes and yield <strong>of</strong><br />
finger<br />
millet<br />
(Eleusine coracana (L.) Gaertn.). Int. J. Chem. Stud., 6(3): 2876-2879.<br />
Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming,<br />
INM, soil-microorganisms-plant interactions<br />
527 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
T4-36P-1351<br />
Nutrient Management for Sustaining Productivity <strong>of</strong> Sunflower Based<br />
Cropping Systems in Vertisols <strong>of</strong> AP<br />
K. Prabhakar 1 , B. V. Venkata Ramanamma 1 , B. V. Prakash Reddy 1 , K. Ramesh 2 ,<br />
Y. S. Satish Kumar 1 , R. Narasimhulu 1 and N. C. Venkateswarlu 1<br />
1 AICRP on Sunflower, RARS, Nandyal, ANGRAU, A. P.<br />
2<br />
ICAR-IIOR, Rajendranagar, T.S.<br />
* kprabhakar7714@gmail.com<br />
Sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) is an important oilseed crop fourth next to soybean,<br />
groundnut, and rape seed. In India, sunflower is grown over an area <strong>of</strong> 8.30 lakh hectares with a<br />
production and productivity <strong>of</strong> 5.44 lakh tonnes and 655 kg per hectare, respectively during the<br />
year 2012-13. In Andhra Pradesh, it is mostly grown as a rabi crop. In combined Andhra<br />
Pradesh, the area under this crop has come down from 4.19 lakh hectares in 2008-09 to 1.42 lakh<br />
hectares in 2012- 13. About 80 percent <strong>of</strong> this area is under rabi. The area has further decreased<br />
and reached 13,000 hectares in 2018-19. (Nimbrayan et al., 2020) In recent changed cropping<br />
systems under ID conditions, new pr<strong>of</strong>itable crops were cultivated in the Kurnool district very<br />
extensively like Bt cotton, Maize, and Soybean, but scientific study and recommendations were<br />
not available to sustain the yields and net returns <strong>of</strong> popular new emerging cropping systems.<br />
Hence this study was initiated to know the suitable fertilizer dose and sunflower cropping<br />
systems for Kurnool district. Among various methods <strong>of</strong> fertilizer recommendation such as<br />
general recommended dose (RDF), soil test-based recommendation, critical value approach, etc.,<br />
the soil test crop response (STCR) approach for target yield is unique in indicating both soil testbased<br />
fertilizer dose and the level <strong>of</strong> yield that can be achieved with good agronomic practices<br />
(Singh et al., 2005)<br />
Methodology<br />
Field experiment were carried out for four consecutive Kharif and Rabi seasons <strong>of</strong> 2017-18 and<br />
2020-21 at R.A.R.S. Farm, Nandyal, Andhra Pradesh. The treatments comprised <strong>of</strong> four<br />
cropping systems viz., Cotton-sunflower (CS1), Maize-sunflower (CS2), Soybean-sunflower<br />
(CS3) and Sunflower-Chickpea (CS4) as main plots and three fertilizer levels for Rabi i.e 100%<br />
RDF (75 N 90+ P2O5+ 60 K2O kg/ha) 100% STCR and 50% STCR as sub plots. The<br />
experimental design was split-plot and treatments were replicated thrice. Kharif crops cotton<br />
(Jaadu Bt), Maize, (Syngenta, 46866) Soybean (JS-335) and Sunflower (NDSH-1012) were<br />
cultivated in main plots by following recommended package <strong>of</strong> practices and recommended dose<br />
528 | Page Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming, INM, soilmicroorganisms-plant<br />
interactions
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
<strong>of</strong> fertilizer doses (RDF) in RBD. For Rabi crops, sunflower and chickpea were raised in<br />
respective main plots as subplots duly imposing fertilizer doses as treatment schedule. STCR<br />
DOSES were calculated based on soil test results <strong>of</strong> kharif post harvest soil available NPK with<br />
25 q targeted yields by using STCR equations. Sunflower equivalent yields, cost <strong>of</strong> cultivation<br />
and net returns were calculated by using standard procedures. The data on various parameters <strong>of</strong><br />
crop was statistically analyzed by following ANOVA.<br />
Results<br />
Results on Rabi Sunflower equivalent yields indicated that seed yield was significantly<br />
influenced by nutrient management practices and cropping system. Among nutrient management<br />
practices tested, 100% STCR recorded significantly higher sunflower equivalent yields (1799<br />
kg/ha) followed by 100% RDF treatment. Significantly lower sunflower equivalent yields were<br />
recorded with 50 % STCR dose <strong>of</strong> fertilizers were applied. Similarly, Soybean-sunflower<br />
cropping system recorded significantly higher sunflower equivalent yields (2072 kg/ha) which<br />
was on par with Maize-sunflower cropping system (2057 kh/ha). cotton–Sunflower cropping<br />
system recorded significantly lower sunflower equivalent yields (914 kg/ha) among four<br />
cropping systems tried. Interaction effect between nutrient management practices and cropping<br />
systems was significant. Sunflower being an exhaustive crop requires higher dose <strong>of</strong> fertilizer in<br />
Rabi season. Hence crop responded for 100% STCR treatment and equation applied for targeted<br />
yield <strong>of</strong> 25q. Shanwaz et.al., 2015 also reported the positive results on sunflower yields with<br />
STCR approach which was ageing the present results. Sheoron et al., 2017 reported that<br />
significant response in yield was observed inclusion <strong>of</strong> farmyard manure (FYM) with the<br />
recommended NPK in the cropping system indicating 6.2% -7.0% grain in system productivity<br />
over the existing recommendations. Results on system equivalent yields and economics shows<br />
that, Maize-sunflower cropping system recorded higher sunflower equivalent yields (3117 kg/ha)<br />
and highest net returns (Rs.119313/- ha), among four cropping systems tested in study. However<br />
soybean sunflower cropping system recorded higher cost-benefit (C:B) ratio (1:3.0)<br />
Conclusion<br />
It is concluded that Maize- sunflower cropping system recorded significantly higher sunflower<br />
yield followed by soybean- sunflower cropping system. Cotton- sunflower cropping system<br />
recorded significantly lower sunflower yields when compared with rest <strong>of</strong> three cropping<br />
systems<br />
Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming,<br />
INM, soil-microorganisms-plant interactions<br />
529 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
References<br />
Nimbrayan, P. K., Singh Punia, V. K., Anu, M. and Kumar, A. 2020. Trends and Growth Rate<br />
Analysis <strong>of</strong> Sunflower in Haryana and India. Res. J. Agric. Sci. 11(3): 686-688.<br />
Sheoran, P., Sardana, V., Singh, S., Chander, S., Kumar Mann, A. and Sharma, P. 2017.<br />
Nutrient management for sustaining productivity <strong>of</strong> sunflower-based cropping sequence<br />
in Indian semiarid regions. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 48 (5)581-593.<br />
Singh, K. N., Raju, N. S., Subba, A. R., Abhishek, R., Sanjay, S., Samanta, R. K. and Maji.<br />
2005. Prescribing optimum dose <strong>of</strong> nutrients for targeted yield through soil fertility map<br />
in Andhra Pradesh (AP). J. Indian Soc. Agric. Statist., 59(2): 131-140.<br />
Yield <strong>of</strong> Rabi crop (Sunflower equivalent yield (Kg/ha)<br />
Treatments<br />
Cotton - Maize - Soybean - Sunflower -<br />
Sunflower Sunflower Sunflower Chickpea<br />
Mean<br />
100 % RDF 807 2114 2091 1146 1538<br />
100 % STCR 1209 2437 2368 1181 1799<br />
50 % STCR 725 1625 1759 1091 1302<br />
Mean 914 2057 2072 1139<br />
SEm CD (P=0.05) CV<br />
Main 82 238 12.2<br />
Sub 60 186 11.8<br />
M x S 79 244 10.3<br />
Effect <strong>of</strong> Integrated Nutrient Management on Growth and Yield <strong>of</strong><br />
KharifGroundnut (Arachis HypogeaL.)<br />
A. K. Ghotmukale, V. P. Suryavanshi, Dipak Davkhar and M. V. Dhuppe<br />
Oilseeds Research Station, Latur- 413512<br />
Vasantrao Naiki Marathwada krishi Vidyapeeth, Parbhani (Maharashtra State, India)<br />
T4-37P-1361<br />
Groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) is one <strong>of</strong> the most important leguminous oiolseeds crop<br />
belonging to family Leguminosae and sub family Papilionaceae. Groundnut crop is cultivated as<br />
rainfed crop during the kharif season but, fails to produce the productivity. Nutrient<br />
management is one <strong>of</strong> the important factors which influences the yield. Hence, experiment<br />
entitled “Effect <strong>of</strong> integrated nutrient management on growth and yield <strong>of</strong> kharif Groundnut”<br />
530 | Page Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming, INM, soilmicroorganisms-plant<br />
interactions
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
(Arachis hypogea L.) was conducted at Oilseeds Research Station, Latur (Maharashtra) to study<br />
the effect <strong>of</strong> INM on growth, yield and economics <strong>of</strong> groundnut during kharif season <strong>of</strong> 2020-21.<br />
Methodology<br />
The experiment was conducted in randomized block design with three replications on vertisols at<br />
Oilseeds Research Station, Latur During kharif season <strong>of</strong> 2020-2021. Eight INM treatments were<br />
applied to the crop viz., T1- RDF(control) , T2- RDF+FYM @ 5 t/ha., T3- RDF+ Vermicompost<br />
@ 2.5 T/ha., T4- RDF+Poultry manure @5 t/ha., T5- RDF+Elemental Sulphur @ 20 kg/ha., T6-<br />
RDFR+ Znso4 @ 20 kg/ha., T7- Feso4 @ 20 kg/ha and T8- RDF+Gypsum @ 500 kg/ha. All the<br />
nutrients were applied at the time <strong>of</strong> sowing. The data were analyzed statistically with standard<br />
ANOVA method.<br />
Results<br />
Pod yield, Gross monetary returns (GMR), Net monetary returns (NMR) and B: C ratio <strong>of</strong><br />
groundnut varied significantly due to various nutrient management treatments. Treatment T3 i. e.<br />
application <strong>of</strong> RDF+Vermicompost @ 2.5 t/ha recorded significantly highest pod yield (2080<br />
kg/ha.) which was found at par with T2 (RDF+FYM @ 5 t/ha.) and T8 (100% RDF+Gypsum @<br />
500 kg/ha.) The highest GMR (99840 Rs/ha.) was also recorded with application <strong>of</strong><br />
RDF+Vermicompost @ 2.5 t/ha which was found at par with the application <strong>of</strong> RDF+ FYM<br />
@5t/ha and RDF+ Gypsum @500 kg/ha. The highest NMR (52025 Rs/ha.) was recorded with<br />
the application <strong>of</strong> RDF+Vermicompost @ 2.5 t/ha which was found at par with treatment T8<br />
(RDF+ Gypsum @500 kg/ha.) The highest B: C ratio was obtained with the application <strong>of</strong> RDF+<br />
Gypsum @500 kg/ha followed by treatment T7 (RDF+ Feso4 @ b20 kg/ha.)<br />
Conclusion<br />
On the basis <strong>of</strong> present investigations, it is concluded that application <strong>of</strong> RDF+ Vermicompost @<br />
2.5 t/ha recorded significantly highest pod yield (2080Kg/ha), highest GMR (99840 Rs/ha),<br />
NMR (52025 Rs/ha) and B:C ratio followed by application <strong>of</strong>RDF + FYM @ 5t/ha and<br />
application <strong>of</strong> RDF+ Gypsum @ 500 kg/ha.<br />
Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming,<br />
INM, soil-microorganisms-plant interactions<br />
531 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Pod yield (kg/ha) and Economics (Rs/ha.) <strong>of</strong> groundnut as influenced by different<br />
treatments.<br />
S.N<br />
Treatment<br />
Dry pod<br />
yield (Kg/ha)<br />
GMR<br />
(Rs/ha)<br />
Economics (Rs/ha)<br />
CC<br />
(Rs/ha)<br />
NMR<br />
(Rs/ha)<br />
B:C<br />
ratio<br />
T 1 RDF(Control) 1405 67440 38584 28856 1.74<br />
T 2 RDF + FYM@ 5T/ha 1945 93360 46575 46815 2.0<br />
T 3 RDF+ Vermicompost @2.5t/ha 2080 99840 47815 52025 2.08<br />
T 4 RDF+ Poultry Manure @ 5t/ha 1728 82800 47825 27023 1.73<br />
T 5<br />
RDF+ Elemental Sulphur @ 20<br />
Kg/ha<br />
1610 77280 55777 38416 1.38<br />
T 6 RDF+ZnSO 4 @ 20 Kg/ha 1540 73920 28864 34886 1.90<br />
T 7 RDF+FeSO 4 @ 20 Kg/ha 1880 90240 39034 51190 2.31<br />
T 8 RDF + Gypsum @ 500 Kg/ha 1892 90816 39314 51502 2.31<br />
References<br />
S.E. ± 86 3620 - 3620<br />
C.D. at 5% 257 10850 - 10848<br />
C.V. 9.2 8.3 15<br />
General mean 1760 84480 44223 40258 1.91<br />
Akbari, K. N., Ramdevputra, M. V., Sutaria, G. S., Vora, V. D. and Padmani, D. R. (2011).<br />
Effect <strong>of</strong> organics, bio and inorganic fertilizer on groundnut yield and its residue effect<br />
on succeeding wheat crop. Legume Res., 34(1), 45-47.<br />
Bhatol, D. P., Ptel, N. A. and Pavaya, R.P. (1994). Effect <strong>of</strong> nitrogen phosphorous and zinc<br />
application on yield and uptake <strong>of</strong> nutrient by groundnut. Indian J. Agric. Res., 28(3),<br />
209-213.<br />
Bhutadiya, J.P., Chaudhary, M. G., Damor, R.P., and Patel,A.J. 2019. Effect <strong>of</strong> different organic<br />
sources on growth, yield, yield attributes and economics <strong>of</strong> summer groundnut (Arachis<br />
hypogaea L.) under organic farming. J. Pharmacog. Photochem., 8(2), 846-849.<br />
Chavam, A. R., Chavan, A. S., Yadav, A. M. and Chavan, V.G. 2019. Effect <strong>of</strong> vermicompost,<br />
rock phosphate, PSB and different bio-products on yield and economics <strong>of</strong> groundnut<br />
(Arachis hypogaea L.) Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. Appl. Sci., 8(12), 2031-2039.<br />
532 | Page Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming, INM, soilmicroorganisms-plant<br />
interactions
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Soil Test Crop Response approach for Chickpea Crop in Vertisol<br />
T4-38P-1390<br />
Y. S. Satish Kumar * , K. Arun Kumar, K. Prabhakar, K. Mohan Vishnuvardhan,<br />
K. Jaya Lakshmi, S. Isha Parveen and M. Jyotsna Kiranmayi<br />
Regional Agricultural Research Station, Acharya N. G. Ranga Agricultural University,<br />
Nandyal-518502<br />
* ys.sathishkumar@angrau.ac.in<br />
Various approaches have been tried to determine the amount <strong>of</strong> fertilizer needed for different<br />
crop yield. Among different approaches the targeted yield approach has proved its variation in<br />
the recommendation <strong>of</strong> chemical fertilizers to variety <strong>of</strong> crops. Chickpea (Cicer arientinum) is<br />
the world 3rd most important source <strong>of</strong> food legume crop. Chickpea grains are rich source <strong>of</strong><br />
protein contains about 23% protein, 57% carbohydrates and 5% fat. It is also good source <strong>of</strong><br />
vitamine B and minerals like potassium, phosphorus and zinc. In India, chickpea is grown on an<br />
8.59 million ha area with 7.05 million tonne production. In Maharashtra chickpea is grown on<br />
1.44 million ha area with 0.73-million-ton production. The average productivity <strong>of</strong> chickpea in<br />
India is 840 kg ha-1 which is considerably low as compared to the production potential <strong>of</strong> the<br />
improved cultivars <strong>of</strong> chickpea. The productivity <strong>of</strong> chickpea can be increased by judicious and<br />
balanced fertilization. Fertilizer management through Integrated Plant Nutrient Supply (IPNS)<br />
based yield target fertilizer prescription equations can be the best option for increase in<br />
productivity as well as maintaining the soil health. It is necessary to supply essential nutrient<br />
elements in appropriate proportion to maintain soil health and soil fertility and also to increase<br />
the crop production. Several approaches have been used for fertilizer recommendation based on<br />
chemical soil test so as to attain maximum yield per unit <strong>of</strong> fertilizer use. Among the various<br />
approaches, the target yield approach has found popularity in India (Subba Rao and Srivastava,<br />
2000). This method not only estimates soil test-based fertilizer dose but also the level <strong>of</strong> yield the<br />
farmer can achieve with that particular dose. It gives a real balance between applied nutrients and<br />
the available nutrients already present in the soil. Crop fertilization based on generalized<br />
recommendation leads to under fertilization or over fertilization, which leads lower production,<br />
pr<strong>of</strong>itability along with environmental pollution. Enhancement <strong>of</strong> farm pr<strong>of</strong>itability under<br />
different soil climate condition it is necessary to have information on optimum fertilizer<br />
recommendation for different crop which are based on the soil test and crop response studies.<br />
Keeping in view, the present investigation entitled ‘Soil test crop response approach for chickpea<br />
crop in Vertisol’ was undertaken to assess the effect <strong>of</strong> STCR based N, P and K application on<br />
productivity <strong>of</strong> Chickpea crop.<br />
Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming,<br />
INM, soil-microorganisms-plant interactions<br />
533 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Methodology<br />
The field experiments were conducted during the kharif& Rabi seasons <strong>of</strong> crop years, 2019, 2020 &<br />
2021at Regional Agricultural Research Station, Nandyala, Andhra Pradesh. The soil <strong>of</strong> experimental site<br />
was medium deep black, low in organic carbon (0.24 %), low in Nitrogen (116 kg/ha), high in available<br />
P 2O 5 (69.5 kg ha -1 ) and available K 2O (536 kg ha -1 ). In Kharif, crops maize, sunflower and blackgram<br />
crops were sown in 3 main plots. In rabi, each main plot devided in to 3 sub plots and chick pea crop was<br />
sown with application <strong>of</strong> 100% RDF, 100% STCR equation (Target 20 q/ha) and 50% STCR equation<br />
(Target 20 q/ha) by following STCR equation <strong>of</strong> FN = 5.03 T – 0.27 SN FP 2O 5 = 9.71 T – 1.82 SP<br />
FK 2O = 6.23 T – 0.22 SK .<br />
Results<br />
Among the three cropping sequences, the higher chickpea yield (2045kg/ha) recorded in Sunflower -<br />
chickpea cropping sequence with 50% STCR based fertilizer application. Among the fertilizer treatments<br />
50% STCR recorded higher chickpea yield followed by 100 % STCR and 100 % RDF in all the cropping<br />
sequences in all the years.<br />
Influence <strong>of</strong> site-specific nutrient management on growth and yield <strong>of</strong> chickpea during rabi<br />
2021-22<br />
Cropping system<br />
Black gram followed<br />
by Chickpea<br />
Maize followed by<br />
Chickpea<br />
Sunflower followed by<br />
Chickpea<br />
Treatments<br />
Plant height<br />
(cm)<br />
No. <strong>of</strong> pods<br />
plant -1<br />
Test weight<br />
(g)<br />
Yield (kg/ha)<br />
100%RDF 44.4 51 31.5 1680<br />
100% STCR 41.5 54 28.3 1820<br />
50% STCR 42.0 43 30.7 1850<br />
100%RDF 39.3 40 27.0 1857<br />
100% STCR 39.4 40 28.7 1925<br />
50% STCR 41.5 44 28.3 1908<br />
100%RDF 40.9 41 29.5 1785<br />
100% STCR 38.7 34 28.3 1833.<br />
50% STCR 38.6 29 28.3 2045<br />
References<br />
Jadhav, A.B., Kadlag, A.D., Patil, V.S., Bachkar, S.R., Dale, R.M. 2009. Response <strong>of</strong> chickpea to<br />
conjoint application <strong>of</strong> inorganic fertilizers based on STCR approach and vermicomposting on<br />
Inceptisol. J. Maharashtra Agric. Univ., 34(2):125-127.<br />
Salunkhe, S.H., Kadlag. And Durgude, S.A. 2018. Soil test crop response approach for chickpea in an<br />
Inceptisol. Int. J. Chem. Stud., 6(4): 1954-1959.<br />
534 | Page Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming, INM, soilmicroorganisms-plant<br />
interactions
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
T4-39P-1421<br />
Studies on Growth Yield and Quality <strong>of</strong> Sesame (Sesamum indicum L.) as<br />
Influenced by Chemical Fertilizers and Liquid Bi<strong>of</strong>ertilizer<br />
S. G. Mane, B. N. Aglave, A. S. Karle, B.V. Asewar, S.V. Thombre and K.A. Chavan<br />
College <strong>of</strong> Agriculture, Parbhani, Maharashtra<br />
Vasantrao Naik Marathwada Krishi Vidyapeeth, Parbhani, Maharashtra<br />
Sesame (Sesamum indicum L.) belongs to the family <strong>of</strong> pedaliaceae and is one <strong>of</strong> the most<br />
ancient oilseeds crop known and used by mankind <strong>of</strong> the world. It is considered to have both<br />
notional and medicinal value. Moreover, seed is a rich source <strong>of</strong> edible oil (48-55%) and protein<br />
(20-28%) with anti-oxidants lignans such as sesamolin and sesamin which prevents rancidity and<br />
give sesame oil a shelf life. Sesame oil is called ‘poor man’s ghee’. The lignin content has useful<br />
physiological effect in human and animal health. The seeds are very rich in iron, magnesium,<br />
manganese, copper and calcium and contain vitamin E, A, B and B1. The seed contain<br />
phytosterols associate with reducing the level <strong>of</strong> blood cholesterol and also phytoestrogens with<br />
antioxidants an anti-cancer property. The plant receives bi<strong>of</strong>ertilizer and fertilizers always give<br />
higher yield and better-quality yield. The price <strong>of</strong> chemical fertilizers has gone up tremendously<br />
and the marginal farmer can not afford such costly fertilisers. About 50% <strong>of</strong> applied inorganic<br />
fertilizers are lost either through leaching or volatilization, under this situation use <strong>of</strong> bi<strong>of</strong>ertilizer<br />
could be the key to sustain soil fertility to obtain the desired level <strong>of</strong> yield and quality. But, the<br />
efficiency <strong>of</strong> biological fertilizers will increase at the presence <strong>of</strong> chemical fertilizers<br />
Methodology<br />
A field experiment was conducted during kharif season <strong>of</strong> 2018 at the Experimental farm,<br />
College <strong>of</strong> Agricultural, Latur to studies on growth, yield and quality <strong>of</strong> sesame (Sesamum<br />
indicum L.) as influenced by chemical fertilizers and liquid bi<strong>of</strong>ertilizer. The soil <strong>of</strong> the<br />
experimental site was medium, black in color with good drainage. The soil was clayey in texture,<br />
low in available nitrogen, medium in available phosphorus, medium in available potassium and<br />
alkaline (pH 8.04) in reaction. The experiment was laid out in randomized block design with<br />
three replications and the treatment were consisting <strong>of</strong> seven with chemical fertilizers and liquid<br />
bi<strong>of</strong>ertilizer. The treatments were, T1- 40:20:00 Kg NPK ha -1 , T2- 50:25:00 kg NPK ha -1 , T3-<br />
60:30:00 kg NPK ha -1 , T4 – Azotobacter + PSB, T5– 40:20:00 kg NPK ha -1 + Azotobacter +<br />
PSB, T6- 50:25:00 kg NPK ha -1 +Azotobacter + PSB, T7- 60:30:00 kg NPK ha -1 + Azotobacter +<br />
PSB. Sowing was done by dibbling by using seed rate 2.5- 4.0 kg ha -1 . The gross and net plot<br />
size was 5.4 m x 4.5 m and 4.5 m x 3.9 m respectively. The total rainfall received during growth<br />
Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming,<br />
INM, soil-microorganisms-plant interactions<br />
535 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
period <strong>of</strong> sesame was 271.8 mm with 13 rainy days. The recommended dose <strong>of</strong> fertilizer was<br />
50:25:00 kg NPK ha -1 applied as per treatments through Urea, single super phosphate and<br />
application <strong>of</strong> liquid bi<strong>of</strong>ertilizer for seed treatment 6 ml kg -1 .<br />
Results<br />
Growth and growth attributes: The data revealed that the growth attributes viz., The<br />
application <strong>of</strong> 60:30:00 kg NPK ha -1 + Azotobacter and PSB (T7) produced significantly higher<br />
plant height and leaf area per plant which was at par with application <strong>of</strong> 60:30:00 kg NPK ha -1<br />
(T3) <strong>of</strong> sesame as compared to other treatments at 30, 45, 60, 75 and at harvest. The increase in<br />
growth attributes may be due to better uptake and translocation <strong>of</strong> plant nutrients to growing<br />
plants, adequate supply <strong>of</strong> nutrients resulted in higher production <strong>of</strong> photosynthate and their<br />
translocation to sink, which ultimately increased the plant growth and growth attributes. The<br />
highest number <strong>of</strong> branches plant -1 (3.53) was recorded with the application <strong>of</strong> 60:30:00 kg NPK<br />
ha -1 + Azotobacter and PSB (T7) followed by Treatment T3 i.e. application <strong>of</strong> 60:30:00 kg NPK<br />
ha -1 produced maximum number <strong>of</strong> branches at all growth stages <strong>of</strong> crop. The increase in growth<br />
under these treatments might be attributed due to the adequate supply <strong>of</strong> nutrients with which the<br />
crop was ultimately favoured better environment for proper growth and development. Total dry<br />
matter plant -1 (g) was the resultant <strong>of</strong> photosynthetic activity and its photo morphogenesis. The<br />
rate <strong>of</strong> increase in dry matter accumulation was slow up 45 days, rapid between 45 to 75 DAS<br />
and attained maximum at harvest. The application <strong>of</strong> 60:30:00 kg NPK ha -1 + Azotobacter and<br />
PSB (T7) followed by T3 i.e. 60:30:00 kg NPK ha -1 produced higher dry matter plant -1 (g) similar<br />
result reported by Deshmukh et al.<br />
Yield attributes and yield: Yield attributes viz., number <strong>of</strong> capsules, weight <strong>of</strong> capsules per<br />
plant, seed yield per plant, seed yield and straw yield (kg/ha) were significantly affected by<br />
different treatments. The capsule yield plant -1 (g) seed yield plant -1 (g) was significantly<br />
influenced by the various treatments. The application <strong>of</strong> 60:30:00 kg NPK ha -1 + Azotobacter<br />
and PSB (T7) recorded higher capsule and seed yield plant-1 followed by application <strong>of</strong> 60:30:00<br />
kg NPK ha -1 (T3). Higher level <strong>of</strong> these parameters could be attributed due to better uptake and<br />
translocation <strong>of</strong> plant nutrients to growing plants, adequate supply <strong>of</strong> nutrients resulted in higher<br />
production <strong>of</strong> photosynthate and their translocation to sink, which ultimately increased the plant<br />
growth and yield attributes. Data on seed yield (kg ha -1 ), straw yield (kg ha -1 ), biological yield<br />
(kg ha -1 ) and harvest index (HI) as influenced by different treatments was found significant. The<br />
application <strong>of</strong> 60:30:00 kg NPK ha -1 + Azotobacter and PSB (T7) recorded higher number <strong>of</strong><br />
capsules plant -1 at harvest followed by (T3) application <strong>of</strong> 60:30:00 kg NPK ha -1 (T3). This<br />
variation in seed yield, straw yield, biological yield (kg ha -1 ) might be due to balanced and<br />
536 | Page Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming, INM, soilmicroorganisms-plant<br />
interactions
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
adequate supply <strong>of</strong> nutrients. Based on above studies it is concluded that among various<br />
treatments, application <strong>of</strong> 60:30:00 kg N.P.K / ha +Azotobacter + PSB observed highest seed<br />
yield (779 kg/ha) and straw yield (3089) followed by 50:25:00 kg N.P.K /ha + Azotobacter +<br />
PSB and 30:60:00 kg N.P.K / ha and found significantly superior over remaining treatments.<br />
Effect onseed yield plant-1, seed yield kg ha-1, straw yield kg ha-1, gross monetary<br />
returns (₹ha -1 ), net monetary returns (₹ha -1 ), benefit: cost ratio<br />
Treatments<br />
Seed yield<br />
(kg ha -1 )<br />
Straw yield<br />
(kg ha -1 )<br />
Gross<br />
monetary<br />
returns<br />
(₹ha -1 )<br />
Net<br />
Monetary<br />
returns<br />
(₹ha -1 )<br />
Benefit:<br />
cost<br />
ratio<br />
T 1- 40:20:00 Kg NPK ha -1 591 2712 59100 28405 1.93<br />
T 2- 50:25:00 kg NPK ha -1 651 2868 65100 34163 2.1<br />
T 3 - 60:30:00 kg NPK ha -1 693 2951 69300 37860 2.2<br />
T 4 – Azotobacter+ PSB 460 2426 46000 17475 1.61<br />
T 5- 40:20:00 kg NPK ha -<br />
1 +Azotobacter+ PSB<br />
598 2724 59800 29005 1.94<br />
T 6- 50:25:00 kg NPK ha -<br />
1 +Azotobacter+ PSB<br />
T 7- 60:30:00 kg NPK ha -<br />
1 +Azotobacter+ PSB<br />
665 2772 66500 35463 2.14<br />
779 3089 77900 46360 2.47<br />
SEm± 39 103 3913 3913 -<br />
C.D. at 5% 121 316 12058 12058 -<br />
General Mean 634 2792 63386 32676 2.06<br />
Conclusions<br />
The application <strong>of</strong> 30:60:00 kg NPK ha -1 + Azotobacter + PSB (T 7) resulted in improvement <strong>of</strong> growth<br />
attributes as well as yield attributes, seed yield (kg ha -1 ), NMR, GMR and B: C ratio and found most<br />
effective and ideal for increasing productivity <strong>of</strong> sesame. The quality parameter was also found<br />
significantly superior for higher oil content (49.90 %) with application <strong>of</strong> 30:60:00 kg NPK ha -1 +<br />
Azotobacter + PSB (T 7). Above conclusion are based on single season research and it needs further<br />
confirmation by repeating the trial for at least one more season.<br />
References<br />
Deshmukh, M. R., Jyotishi Alok. and Ranganathan, A. R. G. 2014. Effect <strong>of</strong> nutrient management on<br />
growth and yield <strong>of</strong> sesame (Sesamum indicum L.). J. Oilseed Res., 31(2):123-125.<br />
Deshmukh, S. S, Sheikh. A. A, Desai, M. M. and Kamble, R. S. 2010. Effect o fintegrated nutrient on<br />
yield <strong>of</strong> summer sesamum. J. Maharastra Agric.Univ. 35(3):453-455.<br />
Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming,<br />
INM, soil-microorganisms-plant interactions<br />
537 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
T4-40P-1455<br />
Response <strong>of</strong> Little Millet (Panicum Sumatrense) to Different Spacing and<br />
Fertilizer Levels<br />
S. J. R. Syed* and B.V. Asewar<br />
Department <strong>of</strong> Agronomy, VNMKV Parbhani, Maharashtra, India<br />
*shireenjahan1998@gmail.com<br />
Among minor millets little millet (Panicum sumatrenseL.) is popular millet and is called as<br />
Indian millet. It is resistant to adverse agro-climatic conditions such as severe drought as well as<br />
water logging. The low productivity is on account <strong>of</strong> inadequate and imbalanced use <strong>of</strong><br />
fertilizers, non-adoption <strong>of</strong> suitable varieties and suitable dose <strong>of</strong> nitrogen as well as weedcontrol<br />
measures by the farmers. Crop geometry is an important factor for better utilization <strong>of</strong><br />
moisture and nutrients from the soil (root spread) and above ground growth (plant canopy) by<br />
harvesting maximum possible solar radiation. The optimum plant population exploit<br />
environmental resources to the fullest extent and thereby leading to higher yield <strong>of</strong> crop. Nutrient<br />
supply in soil is one <strong>of</strong> the most important factor that determine the growth <strong>of</strong> the crop. Fertilizer<br />
is the major source <strong>of</strong> plant nutrients required in sufficient quantity to maintain the nutrient<br />
supply in the soil. The response <strong>of</strong> crop to fertilizers depends on the native fertility level <strong>of</strong> soil,<br />
environmental condition and genotype.<br />
Methodology<br />
The field experiment was conducted at PG Research Farm, Department <strong>of</strong> Agronomy, College <strong>of</strong><br />
Agriculture, VNMKV, Parbhani during kharif 2021-22. The experiment was laid out in split plot<br />
design with three replications consisting <strong>of</strong> twelve treatment combination in each. The treatment<br />
consists <strong>of</strong> three spacings (22.5cm × 10cm, 30cm × 10cm and 45cm × 5cm) and four fertilizer<br />
levels (30:15:15 NPK kg ha -1 , 40:20:20 NPK kg ha -1 , 50:25:25 NPK kg ha -1 and 60:30:30 NPK<br />
kg ha -1 ). The experimental plot was clay in texture with low in available nitrogen (194.60 kg ha -<br />
1 ), medium in available phosphorus (12.73 kg ha -1 ) and high in available potassium (513.84 kg<br />
ha -1 ) and slightly alkaline in reaction pH (7.8). The size <strong>of</strong> a gross and net plot <strong>of</strong> each plot was<br />
5.4m × 4.5m and 4.2m × 4.0m, respectively.<br />
Results<br />
Spacingssignificantly influenced the grain and straw yield. Significantly superior grain and straw<br />
yield (934 kg ha -1 ) was obtained when crop was sown at 45 cm × 5 cm and was on par with 22.5<br />
538 | Page Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming, INM, soilmicroorganisms-plant<br />
interactions
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
cm × 10 cm. Spacing 30 cm × 10 cm recorded the lowest grain yield (774 kg ha -1 ). Similar result<br />
was recorded Koriret al. (2018), Swathi et al. (2020).<br />
Influence <strong>of</strong> spacings and fertility levels on yield and economics <strong>of</strong> little millet<br />
Treatment<br />
Grain yield<br />
(Kg ha -1 )<br />
Straw yield<br />
(Kg ha -1 )<br />
GMR (₹<br />
ha -1 )<br />
NMR<br />
(₹ ha -1 )<br />
B:C ratio<br />
Spacings (S)<br />
S 1-22.5cm×10cm 909 1642 59057 31679 2.16<br />
S 2-30cm×10cm 774 1492 50315 23072 1.85<br />
S 3-45cm×5cm 934 1682 60696 33318 2.22<br />
SE (m) ± 30.35 34.03 1700 875 -<br />
C.D. at 5 % 119.14 133.61 6674 3435 -<br />
Fertilizer Levels (F)<br />
F 1 (30:15:15 NPK kg ha -1 ) 782 1476 50803 24456 1.93<br />
F 2 (40:20:20 NPK kg ha -1 ) 814 1529 52930 25925 1.96<br />
F 3 (50:25:25 NPK kg ha -1 ) 925 1687 60155 32493 2.17<br />
F 4 (60:30:30 NPK kg ha -1 ) 967 1729 62869 34549 2.22<br />
SE (m) ± 34.38 48.56 1963 1010 -<br />
C.D. at 5 % 102.16 144.30 5833 3002 -<br />
Interaction effect (S×F)<br />
SE (m) ± 59.55 84.12 3400 1750 -<br />
C.D. at 5 % NS NS NS NS -<br />
G.M 872 1605 56689 29356 1.90<br />
The gross monetary returns and net monetary returns and benefit: cost ratio (2.03) was<br />
significantly influenced by different spacings. Significantly higher gross and net monetary return<br />
(₹60696 ha -1 ) were recorded at 45 cm × 5 cm. spacing. The lowest value <strong>of</strong> gross monetary<br />
returns was recorded by 30 cm × 10 cm (₹50315 ha -1 ).<br />
Among different fertilizer levels, application <strong>of</strong> 60:30:30 NPK Kg ha -1 (F 4) recorded maximum grain<br />
yield (967 kg ha -1 ), straw yield (1729 kg ha -1 ) and biological yield (2696 kg ha -1 ) which was<br />
significantly higher over 30:15:15 NPK kg ha -1 (F 1) and 40:20:20 NPK Kg ha -1 (F 2) and found at par<br />
with 50:25:25 NPK Kg ha -1 (F 3).<br />
Application <strong>of</strong> 60:30:30 NPK Kg ha -1 (F 4) recorded the maximum GMR (₹ 62869) and NMR (₹<br />
34549) which was superior over 30:15:15 NPK kg ha -1 (F 1) and 40:20:20 NPK Kg ha -1 (F 2) and<br />
found at par with 50:25:25 NPK Kg ha -1 (F 3) and the highest B: C ratio (2.22) was also observed with<br />
the application <strong>of</strong> fertilizer level 60:30:30 NPK Kg ha -1 (F 4).<br />
Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming,<br />
INM, soil-microorganisms-plant interactions<br />
539 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Interaction effect: The interaction effect between spacing and fertilizer levels were found to be non<br />
significant in grain yield, straw yield and economics <strong>of</strong> the treatments.<br />
Conclusion<br />
From present investigation it is concluded that among the different treatments, 45 cm × 5 cm spacing<br />
was found productive and pr<strong>of</strong>itable as compared to 30 cm × 10 cm and found at par with 22.5 cm<br />
×10 cm. Similarly, among different fertilizer levels application <strong>of</strong> 60:30:30 NPK Kg ha -1 found better<br />
References<br />
Korir, A. K. 2019. Effects <strong>of</strong> fertilization and spacing on growth and grain yields <strong>of</strong> finger millet<br />
(Eleusinecoracana) in Ainamoi, Kericho County (Doctoral dissertation, KeMU).<br />
Swathi, B., Murthy, V. R. K., Rekha, M. S., and Lalitha, K. J. 2020. Performance <strong>of</strong> pearl millet as<br />
influenced by plant geometry and sowing windows. J. Pharmacog. Phytochem., 9(2), 1898-<br />
1900.<br />
T4-41P-1480<br />
Effect <strong>of</strong> Polymulching on Dalley Chilli in Eastern Himalayan Region<strong>of</strong> West<br />
Bengal<br />
Pranab Barma*, Novin Chamling, M. W. Moktan, F. H. Rahman and B.D. Kharga<br />
Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Kalimpong, Uttar Banga Krishi Viswavidylya, Kalimpong, WB- 734301<br />
* ICAR-Agricultural Technology Application Research Institute Kolkata,<br />
Sector III, Salt Lake, Kolkata- 700097<br />
*pranab.barma@gmail.com<br />
Dalley chilli is one <strong>of</strong> the most valued spices crops in entire Himalayan region <strong>of</strong> Kalimpong<br />
district due to its high pungency (10,0000 to 35,0000 SHU) and taste. The crop is generally<br />
grown during the period <strong>of</strong> middle <strong>of</strong> March to first week <strong>of</strong> July. During the growth period,<br />
prevailing <strong>of</strong> unfavourable condition such as heavy rainfall, water stagnant, frequent leaching<br />
loss <strong>of</strong> micronutrient from soil resulting to micro-nutrient deficiency, excessive weed growth and<br />
heavy infestation <strong>of</strong> pests and diseases hampers the crop growth and yield. Polymulching is one<br />
<strong>of</strong> the novel approaches for horticulture as it reduces soil moisture loss, suppress weed growth,<br />
increases radiation and water use efficiencies which directly effect on crop yield. Therefore, a<br />
study on the impact <strong>of</strong> polymulching was conducted at NICRA adopted village Paiyong, under<br />
Krishi Vigyan Kendra <strong>of</strong> Kalimpong during the year 2022 with an objective to enhance the<br />
production <strong>of</strong> Dalleychilli with maximum returns to the farmers. Finding <strong>of</strong> the trials suggests<br />
540 | Page Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming, INM, soilmicroorganisms-plant<br />
interactions
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
that Dalleychilli under polymulching condition recorded maximum yield (20.58 q/ha) and yield<br />
attributing characters and highest economic return BCR ratio(4.46)over open field condition<br />
(control). Thus, Polymulching in Dalleychilli perhaps a boon for enhancing production as it also<br />
plays ameliorate role over biotic and abiotic stress in Plants.<br />
T4-42P-1506<br />
A Study on Resilience <strong>of</strong> Soil Health through Fertigation and Nutrient<br />
Management in Tomato<br />
Minnu John 1* , M. Elayarajan 2 , G. Jayalekshmi 1 and P. S.Bhindhu 1<br />
1 Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Kottayam, Kerala, India 686 566<br />
2 Associate Pr<strong>of</strong>essor, Tamil Nadu AgriculturalUniversity, Coimbatore, India 641 003<br />
* minnu.4.john@gmail.com<br />
Poor understanding <strong>of</strong> the soil-plant relationships has led to the mismanagement <strong>of</strong> resources,<br />
especially fertilizers and water. This may end up in cascading effect on nature. Hence techniques<br />
that can pose minimal threat to the environment without compromising the plant growth, yield,<br />
and quality parameters needed to be adopted as a measure <strong>of</strong> resilience to revive the soil heath.<br />
Tomato is a crop that responds well to fertilizers and irrigation. The drip fertigation method<br />
which supplies nutrients to the plant roots directly through irrigation has proved to be very<br />
significant in improving nutrient uptake which finally results in enhancement <strong>of</strong> growth and<br />
yield <strong>of</strong> tomato crop (Ankush et al., 2017). Nutrient ratios may be optimized to bring down the<br />
surplus application <strong>of</strong> fertilizers.<br />
Methodology<br />
A pot experiment was conducted at Department <strong>of</strong> Soil Science and Agricultural Chemistry,<br />
Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatoreduring 2020-21 with TNAU Tomato Hybrid<br />
CO-3 as a test crop. This experiment was laid in a Completely Randomized Design with nine<br />
treatment combinations viz., absolute control without any fertilizers, control with solid fertilizers<br />
at the TNAU recommended dose <strong>of</strong> fertilizers, different nutrient ratios <strong>of</strong> N, P, K and N, P, K<br />
with Ca and B, and each treatment were replicated thrice. All the treatments were given nutrient<br />
supply through drip fertigation (except in the control treatments). The different treatments were<br />
Solid Fertilizers @ 100% RDF (Control), 1:1:1 NPK Fertigation @ 100% RDN + Basal P<br />
(Solid) (75% RDF), 1:1:1 NPK Fertigation @ 100% RDN, 1:2:1 NPK Fertigation @ 100%<br />
RDN, 2:1:1 NPK Fertigation @ 100% RDN, 1:1:1 NPK Fertigation @100% RDN+Ca, 1:1:1<br />
NPK Fertigation @ 100% RDN+B, 1:1:1NPKFertigation@100%RDN+Ca+B and Absolute<br />
Control. Observations were made in different growth parameters like plant height, number <strong>of</strong><br />
Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming,<br />
INM, soil-microorganisms-plant interactions<br />
541 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
leaves plant -1 and plant fresh weight at the critical stages <strong>of</strong> tomato plant growth viz., vegetative,<br />
flowering, fruiting and harvesting stages.<br />
Results<br />
The plant height, number <strong>of</strong> leaves plant -1 and plant fresh weight increased across the treatments<br />
at all stages <strong>of</strong> growth. Among the treatments, 1:1:1NPK fertigation @ 100% RDN+ Ca+ B (T8)<br />
recorded the highest plant fresh weight and plant heightat all the growth stages. Plants in this<br />
treatment also had maximum number <strong>of</strong> leaves plant -1 during the flowering, fruiting and harvest<br />
stages. The least growth <strong>of</strong> plant at all growth stages <strong>of</strong> tomato was observed in the absolute<br />
control (T9).<br />
The results indicated that the plant growth was significantly influenced by the nutrient ratios as<br />
well as method <strong>of</strong> fertilizer application. The fertigated plants had higher plant growth than those<br />
in the control (T1 and T9). The enhanced growth might be due to the increased cell division and<br />
elongation at higher levels <strong>of</strong> N and due to the inclusion <strong>of</strong> boron and calcium. The present<br />
findings are also in agreement with the findings <strong>of</strong>Solaimalai et al. (2005), Aruna et al.<br />
(2007),Haque et al. (2011), Sajad et al. (2018) and Kale et al. (2019) who reported increased<br />
plant growth due to better utilization <strong>of</strong> applied nutrients and water by the plants under drip<br />
fertigationas compared to the conventional method <strong>of</strong> irrigation.<br />
Conclusion<br />
The study revealed thatamong the methods <strong>of</strong> fertilizer application employed, drip<br />
fertigationwith water soluble fertilizer based on crop growth stage was found to be the most<br />
effective, which had a pronounced and significant effect on the growth <strong>of</strong> tomato plant as<br />
compared to soil application <strong>of</strong> fertilizer. Supply <strong>of</strong> 1:1:1 NPK (100% RDN) together with Ca<br />
+B (T8) was the best cost-effective nutrient combination for improved growth <strong>of</strong> tomato crop<br />
under fertigation. The roles and importance <strong>of</strong> calcium and boron in tomato plant growth were<br />
also proved by the results <strong>of</strong> this experiment. The inclusion <strong>of</strong> calcium and boron in the<br />
fertigation schedule may be henceforth pondered. The results also indicated that the stage wise<br />
application <strong>of</strong> nutrients through fertigation required lesser quantity <strong>of</strong> nutrients. Thus, in practice,<br />
it helps to avoid the unnecessary application <strong>of</strong> fertilizers, again saving nutrients and money and<br />
also maintains the soil environmental quality and health.<br />
542 | Page Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming, INM, soilmicroorganisms-plant<br />
interactions
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Details <strong>of</strong> Treatment and Total amount <strong>of</strong> nutrients supplied at critical growth stages based<br />
on TNAU CPG (2020).<br />
Treatment<br />
Total amount <strong>of</strong> nutrients supplied per pot at<br />
critical growth stages<br />
N(g)<br />
P2O5(g)<br />
K2O<br />
(g)<br />
Ca(mg)<br />
T 1 Solid Fertilizers @ 100% RDF (Control) 2.31 8.30 2.21 - -<br />
T 2<br />
1:1:1 NPK Fertigation @ 100% RDN + Basal P<br />
(Solid) (75% RDF)<br />
B(mg)<br />
5.59 11.8 5.59 - -<br />
T 3 1:1:1 NPK Fertigation @ 100% RDN 5.59 5.59 5.59 - -<br />
T 4 1:2:1 NPK Fertigation @ 100% RDN 2.15 7.31 2.14 - -<br />
T 5 2:1:1 NPK Fertigation @ 100% RDN 5.64 7.97 1.75 - -<br />
T 6 1:1:1 NPK Fertigation @100% RDN+Ca 3.92 9.01 2.79 0.58 -<br />
T 7 1:1:1 NPK Fertigation @ 100% RDN+B 5.59 11.8 5.59 - 0.38<br />
T 8 1:1:1NPKFertigation@100%RDN+Ca+B 5.59 11.8 5.59 0.58 0.38<br />
T 9 Absolute Control - - - - -<br />
*TNAU recommended dose <strong>of</strong> fertilizers- 200:250:250 NPK kg ha -1<br />
References<br />
Ankush, A., Singh, V. and Sharma, S. K. 2017.Response <strong>of</strong> tomato (SolanumlycopersicumL.) to<br />
fertigation by irrigation scheduling in drip irrigation system. J. Appl. Nat. Sci., 9(2),<br />
1170-1175.<br />
Aruna, P., Sudagar, I., Manivannan, M., Rajangam, J. and Natarajan, S. 2007. Effect <strong>of</strong><br />
fertigation and mulching for yield and quality in tomato cv. PKM-1. Asian J. Hortic.<br />
2(2): 50-54.<br />
Gupta,A. and Shukla,V. 1977.Response <strong>of</strong> tomato (Lycopersiconesculentum Mill.) to plant<br />
spacing, nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium fertilization. Indian J. Hortic., 34(3): 270-<br />
276.<br />
Haque, M., Paul, A. and Sarker, J. 2011. Effect <strong>of</strong> nitrogen and boron on the growth and yield <strong>of</strong><br />
tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum M.). Int. J. Bio-Resour. Stress Manag. 2 (3):277-282.<br />
Kale, K., Pawar, D. and Shinde, M. 2019. "Effects <strong>of</strong> fertigation on yield, quality and nutrient<br />
use <strong>of</strong> hybrid tomato when cultivated in Inceptisols." Indian Society <strong>of</strong> Soil Salinity and<br />
Water Quality (Registered under Societies Registration Act XXI <strong>of</strong> 1860) Editorial Board<br />
11 (1):125-129.<br />
Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming,<br />
INM, soil-microorganisms-plant interactions<br />
543 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Sajad, S., Ashraf, M.I., Hussain, B., Sajjad, M., Sattar, S., Adnan, M., Saeed, M.S., Ismail, M.,<br />
Ali, H.S. and Abdullah, M. 2018. Foliar application effect <strong>of</strong> boron, calcium and nitrogen<br />
on vegetative and reproductive attributes <strong>of</strong> tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L). J. Agri.<br />
Sci. Food Res. 9(1):199.<br />
Solaimalai, A., Baskar, M., Sadasakthi,A. and Subburamu, K. 2005. Fertigation in high value<br />
crops–a review. Agric. Rev. 26 (1):1-13.<br />
T4-43P-1524<br />
Phenological and Quality Response <strong>of</strong> Gram (CicerArietinum L.) to Foliage-<br />
Applied Fertilizers<br />
Sharad Shikandar Jadhav<br />
Department <strong>of</strong> Agronomy, Post Graduate Institute, Mahatma Phule Krishi Vidyapeeth,<br />
Rahuri- 413 722, Dist- Ahmednagar, Maharashtra, India.<br />
India is also the largest gram-importing country in the world. There is a need to augment the<br />
productivity <strong>of</strong> grams to meet the requirement. Farmers could rely very well on pr<strong>of</strong>it by<br />
growing gram because <strong>of</strong> its high market demand and price. It is very imperative to develop<br />
improved technologies for enhancing the productivity <strong>of</strong> gram. Foliar application <strong>of</strong> watersoluble<br />
fertilizers along with soil application has several advantages in supplementing the<br />
nutritional requirement <strong>of</strong> crops, correcting nutrient deficiencies, and providing muchneedednutrients<br />
during stages <strong>of</strong> high nutrient demand in the crop. Foliar nutrition is recognized<br />
as an important method <strong>of</strong> fertilization in modern agriculture. New-generation special fertilizers<br />
have been introduced exclusively for foliar feeding and fertilization. Water soluble fertilizers<br />
have different ratios <strong>of</strong> N, P, and K which are highly water soluble and amenable for foliar<br />
nutrition (Jaybalet al., 1999). Spraying <strong>of</strong> micronutrient to correct the nutritional deficiencies <strong>of</strong><br />
the plant were in vogue, since early time, but the foliar application <strong>of</strong> macronutrients was not<br />
tried on a large scale. Today rapid development <strong>of</strong> efficient spraying equipment, the availability<br />
<strong>of</strong> various forms <strong>of</strong> highly water-soluble fertilizers, and the availability <strong>of</strong> different grades <strong>of</strong><br />
fertilizers, the practice <strong>of</strong> foliar feeding <strong>of</strong> nutrients has become a viable option for obtaining a<br />
better yield <strong>of</strong> crops. Therefore, the phenological response <strong>of</strong> gram-to-foliage-applied fertilizers<br />
and the quality response <strong>of</strong> gram-to-foliage-applied fertilizers were studied in this experiment.<br />
Methodology<br />
The field experiment was carried out during 2020-21 at the experimental farm <strong>of</strong> Cotton<br />
Research Scheme, VNMKV, Parbhani. The experiment was laid out in a Randomized block<br />
544 | Page Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming, INM, soilmicroorganisms-plant<br />
interactions
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
design with eight treatments and three replications. There were eight treatments viz, T1 is RDF<br />
(No spray), T2 is RDF + 1% urea spraying, T3 is RDF + 1% DAP spraying, T4 is RDF + 1%<br />
19:19:19 (N,P,K) spraying, T5 is RDF + 1% 00:52:34 (N,P,K) spraying, T6 is RDF + 13:00:45<br />
(N,P,K) spraying, T7 is RDF + 1% 13:40:13 (N,P,K) spraying and T8- control (no RDF, no<br />
spray). Foliar application <strong>of</strong> fertilizers (1%) is done at the flowering and pod development stage.<br />
The treatments were allotted randomly in each replication. Therecommendeddose<strong>of</strong>fertilizer<br />
(25:50:25 NPK kg ha -1 ) was applied at the time <strong>of</strong> sowing through Urea, SSP, and MOP. The<br />
recommended cultural practices and plant protectionmeasureswereproperlytakenfrom<br />
timetotime.The plants were used for measuring phenological characteristics like plant height, the<br />
number <strong>of</strong> branches plant and number <strong>of</strong> nodule plants, the seed index by taking 100 seeds, and<br />
weight for working out the seed index on electric balance.Protein content was determined by<br />
multiplying the percent <strong>of</strong> N in the grain sample by a constant factor <strong>of</strong> 6.25 as described by<br />
A.O.A.C. (1975).The statistical method <strong>of</strong> analysis <strong>of</strong> variance was used for analyzing the data<br />
and the “F” test <strong>of</strong> significance was used for testing the null hypothesis to determine whether the<br />
observed treatment effects were real and discernible from chance effects.<br />
Results<br />
Data in respect <strong>of</strong> plant height and number <strong>of</strong> branches plant -1 influenced by different treatment.<br />
The plant height (cm)differed significantly due to different foliar applications <strong>of</strong> fertilizers in<br />
gram, T4 - RDF + 1% 19:19:19 NPK spraying at flowering and pod development recorded<br />
significantly highest plant height (59.73) cm which was found at par with T2 - RDF + 1% Urea<br />
spraying at flowering and pod development (58.77) cm however it was significantly higher than<br />
all other treatments. Significantly lowest (42.87) cm plant height was recorded with T8 - Control<br />
(No RDF, No spray). In the present study, the data revealed an increase in plant height through<br />
foliar application <strong>of</strong> 19:19:19and urea may be attributed to increasing the N status in the plant<br />
system.<br />
The number <strong>of</strong> branches plant -1 <strong>of</strong> gram was significantly influenced due to different foliar<br />
fertilizers application, T4 - RDF + 1% 19:19:19 NPK spraying at flowering and pod development<br />
recorded a significantly higher number <strong>of</strong> branches (24.20) which was found at par with T5 -<br />
RDF + 00:52:34 NPK spraying at flowering and pod development (23.40) however, it was<br />
significantly higher than all other treatments. significantly the lowest number <strong>of</strong> branches (13.19)<br />
recorded with T8 - Control (No RDF, No spray). The maximum number <strong>of</strong> branches might be<br />
due to the increased number <strong>of</strong> nodes and the development <strong>of</strong> plants due to the treatment effect<br />
and increase in the availability <strong>of</strong> nitrogen which encouraged the carbohydrate synthesis in<br />
grams as there was the availability <strong>of</strong> applied nitrogen. Data on the number <strong>of</strong> nodule plant -1 as<br />
Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming,<br />
INM, soil-microorganisms-plant interactions<br />
545 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
influenced by various treatments. The mean number <strong>of</strong> nodule plant -1 was not influenced<br />
significantly by various foliar applications <strong>of</strong> fertilizers in gram. However, the mean number <strong>of</strong><br />
nodule plant -1 at 30, 45, 60, 75, and 90 DAS were 16.98, 36.16, 40.47, 20.81, and 9.74<br />
respectively. The seed index was not influenced significantly due to foliage-applied fertilizers.<br />
The highest seed index (8.53 g) was recorded with T5 - RDF + 1% 00:52:34 (NPK) spraying at<br />
flowering and pod development stage followed by T4 - RDF + 1% 19:19:19 (NPK) spraying at<br />
flowering and pod development (8.42 g) and T7 - RDF + 1% 13:40:13 (NPK) spraying at<br />
flowering and pod development (8.27 g). The lowest seed index (7.20 g) was recorded with T4 -<br />
Control (No RDF, No spray). The protein content (%) differed significantly due to different<br />
foliage applied fertilizers in gram, T4- RDF + 1% 19:19:19 NPK spraying at flowering and pod<br />
development recorded significantly highest protein content (19.68%) which was found at par<br />
with T7 - RDF + 1% 13:40:13 (NPK) spraying at flowering and pod development (19.37%) and<br />
T3- RDF + 1% DAP (NPK) spraying at flowering and pod development (18.75%). Significantly<br />
lowest (16.87%) protein content recorded with T8 - Control (No RDF, No spray). An increase in<br />
protein content may be due to the most important role <strong>of</strong> nitrogen in plants is mainly in its<br />
presence in the nucleic acid which is the protein structure. In addition, nitrogen is also found in<br />
chlorophyll molecules. Chlorophyllconverts sunlight energy into assimilates through<br />
photosynthesis. Therefore, the nitrogen supply to the plant will influence the amount <strong>of</strong> protein.<br />
Conclusion<br />
The foliage application <strong>of</strong> 1% 19:19:19 (NPK) or 1% 00:52:34 (NPK) or 1% 13:40:13 (NPK) spraying at<br />
flowering and pod development stage along with RDF was found beneficial and productive for improving<br />
phenological characters <strong>of</strong> a gram. For higher quality gram foliage application <strong>of</strong> 1% 19:19:19 (NPK) or<br />
1%, 13:40:13 (NPK) or 1% DAP along with RDF was found beneficial.<br />
References<br />
A. O. A. C. 1975. Association <strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong>ficial Analytical chemist, Washington, D.C. U.S.A.<br />
Jaybal, A., Revathy, M. and Saxena, M. G. 1999. Effect <strong>of</strong> foliar nutrition on nutrient uptake pattern in<br />
soybean. Andhra Agric. J. 46:243-244.<br />
546 | Page Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming, INM, soilmicroorganisms-plant<br />
interactions
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Plant height (cm), number <strong>of</strong> branches plant -1 , seed index (g) and protein content (%) as<br />
influenced by foliage applied fertilizers<br />
Treatment<br />
Plant height<br />
(cm)<br />
Number <strong>of</strong><br />
branches plant -1<br />
Seed<br />
Index (g)<br />
Protein<br />
Content<br />
(%)<br />
T 1 - RDF (no spray) 47.47 15.60 7.70 17.18<br />
T 2 - RDF + 1% Urea spraying 58.77 18.00 7.71 18.43<br />
T 3 - RDF + 1% DAP spraying 54.34 19.40 7.75 18.75<br />
T 4- RDF + 1% 19:19:19 (NPK) spraying 59.73 24.20 8.42 19.68<br />
T 5 - RDF + 1% 00:52:34 (NPK) spraying 47.93 23.40 8.53 17.50<br />
T 6 - RDF + 1% 13:00:45 (NPK) spraying 49.34 21.10 7.84 17.81<br />
T 7 - RDF + 1% 13:40:13 (NPK) spraying 54.37 20.80 8.27 19.37<br />
T 8 - Control (No RDF, No spray) 42.87 13.19 7.20 16.87<br />
S. E. (m) + 1.15 0.76 0.35 0.36<br />
CD at 5% 3.47 2.31 NS 1.10<br />
General Mean 51.85 19.46 7.93 18.19<br />
Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming,<br />
INM, soil-microorganisms-plant interactions<br />
T4-44P-1548<br />
Assessment <strong>of</strong> Bio-Fertilizers and Phosphorus Levels on Productivity and<br />
Pr<strong>of</strong>itability <strong>of</strong> Green Gram (Vigna Radiata L.)<br />
Manoj Kumar, P. K. Choudhary and Ajeet Kumar<br />
CRA Programme, KVK Supaul, BAU, Sabour, Bhagalpur (BIHAR)<br />
An On-farm trial was conducted in the Supaul district during the two consecutive summer<br />
seasons<strong>of</strong> 2020 and 2021 respectively on sandy soil. For this ten farmer’splots <strong>of</strong> different<br />
villages Fakirna (Raghopur), Immamganj (Raghopur), Modhra (Kishanpur), Andauli<br />
(Kishanpur) Bella (Supaul), and Sadanandpur (Saraigarh) were selected. The Moong variety<br />
IPM-02-04 with three technology optionsopted with 10 replications. Farmer’s practice: Sowing<br />
<strong>of</strong> Moong without seed treatment by R.culture and no application <strong>of</strong> PSB and phosphorous.<br />
Technology option I: Seed treatment by R.culture 0.5 liter/ha + application <strong>of</strong> 0.75liters PSB/ha<br />
+ 75% RDF i.e 15 kg N and 30 kg phosphorous/ha. Technology option II: Seed treatment by<br />
R.culture @ 0.5 liter/ha + 100% RDF i.e 20 kg nitrogen and 40 kg phosphorous/ha. The result so<br />
far obtained revealed that the maximum grain yield i.e 12.4 q/ha recorded by technology option I<br />
i.e sowing <strong>of</strong> moong by the seed treatment R.culture plus the application <strong>of</strong> 75% RDF i.e 15 kg<br />
nitrogen and 30 kg phosphorous plus 0.75 liter PSB/ha whereas minimum grain yield i.e 6.9 q/ha<br />
547 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
recorded by the Farmers practice i.e sowing <strong>of</strong> moong without seed treatment by R.culture and<br />
no. application <strong>of</strong> PSB and phosphorous. Technology option I and technology option II were<br />
statically at par and significantly higher in comparison to farmers’ practice. Results show that the<br />
yield attributing characters viz., Grain yield, pod length, grain per pod, etc., Growth parameters,<br />
and economics were also found significantly higher in T. option Iand T. option II in comparison<br />
with farmers’ practice.<br />
T4-45P-1563<br />
Effect <strong>of</strong> Long-Term Fertilizer Application on Crop Productivity <strong>of</strong> Wheat<br />
(Triticum aestivum L.) Grown in Vertisols<br />
Jyoti Bangre*, K.S. Bangar, Subhash, Bharat Singh and B.B. Parmar<br />
JNKVV, College <strong>of</strong> Agriculture, Jabalpur 482004 Madhya Pradesh<br />
* bangrejyoti9@gmail.com<br />
Integrated nutrient management (INM) not only reduces the nutrient gap between addition and<br />
removal, but also ensures higher nutrient use efficiency, sustainability, and reduced soil pollution<br />
(Chaudhary et al., 2020).Long-term fertiliser experiments are the primary source <strong>of</strong> information<br />
for determining the effect <strong>of</strong> cropping systems on soil quality attributes and they are carried out<br />
to monitor the impact <strong>of</strong> fertiliser input management on soil fertility and the long-term viability<br />
<strong>of</strong> a production system. It provides valuable information on the effect <strong>of</strong> continuous application<br />
<strong>of</strong> different levels <strong>of</strong> fertiliser nutrients, alone and in combination with organic manure, on soil<br />
fertility and crop productivity under intensive cropping.<br />
Methodology<br />
By keeping these views, a field experiment was conducted at the All India Coordinated Research<br />
Project on Long Term Fertilizer Experiment (AICRP-LTFE) Research farm, Department <strong>of</strong> Soil<br />
Science and Agricultural Chemistry, JNKVV, Jabalpur during the rabi season (the year 2017 and<br />
2019) on wheat (GW-366). The treatment comprised <strong>of</strong>T1-50% NPK, T2-100% NPK, T3-<br />
150NPK, T4-100% NPK+Hand Weeding T5-100%NPK+Zn, T6-100% NP, T7-100% N, T8-100%<br />
NPK+FYM @5t ha -1 , T9-100% NPK-S and T10-Control.<br />
Results<br />
The two-year mean data indicated that the highest grain yield <strong>of</strong> wheat was obtained with (6156,<br />
6570 kg ha -1 ) 100% NPK + FYM treatment (T8) followed by (6006, 6216 kg ha -1 ) with 150%<br />
NPK treatment (T3). The lowest grain and straw yield was found in the (1406, 3945 kg ha -1 )<br />
548 | Page Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming, INM, soilmicroorganisms-plant<br />
interactions
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
control plot. Progressively, it was increased (4244, 5470 kg ha -1 ) in treatment T1receiving suboptimal<br />
fertilizer dose 50% NPK. The results also indicated that even if 50% NPK <strong>of</strong> the<br />
recommended optimal dose was applied was found much more beneficial in comparison to the<br />
application <strong>of</strong> imbalanced nutrient application. Similarly, it was also found that 100% N<br />
treatment (T7) resulted in 1779 and 5350 kg ha -1 grain and straw yield <strong>of</strong> wheat. It was<br />
progressively increased when P and Knutrients were included in fertilizer schedule.<br />
Reference<br />
Chaudhari, S.K., Biswas, P.P. and Kapil, H. 2020. Soil Health and Fertility. In the Soils <strong>of</strong><br />
India. Springer. 215-231.<br />
T4-46P-1618<br />
Studies on Effect <strong>of</strong> NPK, Bulb Size and Spacing on Yield <strong>of</strong> Pran (Top<br />
Onion) under Temperate Rainfed Conditions<br />
Tahir Saleem, Tariq Sultan, Nazir Ahmad Mir and H.A. Malik<br />
Krishi Vigyan Kendra Bandipora, SKUAST Kashmir (J&K)-193502<br />
Pran (Allium x cornutumClementi ex Visiani) is a triploid viviparous species <strong>of</strong> genus Allium,<br />
extensively grown in Kashmir from times immemorial (Singh et al., 1967, Klaas and Friesen<br />
2002). Pran is a cool season spice crop which grows well in mild climatic conditions. Being a<br />
long duration, rainfed and less labour intensive, this crop is cultivated on l<strong>of</strong>ty hills where<br />
irrigation facilities seldom exist. It is more cold-hardy than onion and tolerates frost to a greater<br />
extent. Pran is traditionally cultivated in Kashmir and it is very popular as a spice and condiment<br />
due to its tasty bulbs and leaves. It is highly relished in Kashmiri kitchens in the preparation <strong>of</strong><br />
soups, meat and salads. In the absence <strong>of</strong> scientific information with regard to appropriate<br />
nutrient dosage, spacing and bulb size for propagation in pran, it is difficult to reckon and realize<br />
the objective <strong>of</strong> higher yield. The present investigation was carried out to find the appropriate<br />
nutrient dose, bulb size and spacing for yield maximization in Pran.<br />
Methodology<br />
The experiment was conducted in two successive years and laid out in random block design with<br />
27 treatments and 3 replications as detailed below. Three factors viz., NPK, spacing and bulb size<br />
were taken for evaluation, each at three different levels forming 27 treatment combinations.<br />
Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming,<br />
INM, soil-microorganisms-plant interactions<br />
549 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
No. <strong>of</strong> levels 1 II III<br />
NPK F 1:80:60:40 Kgha -1 F 2:100:80:60 Kgha -1 F 3:120:100:80NPK Kgha -1<br />
Spacing S 1:20 cm x 10 cm S 2: 20 cm x 15 cm S 3:20 cm x 20 cm<br />
Bulb Size B 1 : Small(2.5-5.0 g) B 2: Medium (5.1-7.5g) Large (7.6-10 g)<br />
Observations were recorded on various growth, yield and quality attributes <strong>of</strong> top onion. Ten<br />
competitive plants were selected at random from each treatment and tagged for recording<br />
observations. Mean values for all the characters were worked out. The bulbs obtained from<br />
uprooting ten randomly selected plants were weighed expressed as bulb weight per plant in<br />
grams for all the treatment combinations in all the replications. The bulb yield per hectare was<br />
computed based on bulb yield per plot and expressed in tonnes per hectare.<br />
Results<br />
The study showed that maximum fresh bulb weight <strong>of</strong> 16.44 g was registered in treatment<br />
combination F3B3S3 (120:100:80 NPK kg ha-1 + 7.6-10.0 g bulb size and 20 x 20 cm spacing)<br />
after pooling the two-year data. This was followed by treatment combination F3B2S3<br />
(120:100:80 NPK kg ha-1 + 5.1-7.5g bulb size and 20 x 20 cm spacing) which registered the<br />
fresh bulb weight <strong>of</strong> 16.34 g in pooled analysis. Lowest fresh bulb weight <strong>of</strong> 8.04 g was<br />
registered in treatment combination F1B1S1. Maximum fresh yield <strong>of</strong> 37.72 t ha -1 was registered<br />
in treatment combination F2B2S2 after pooling the two-year data. This was followed by<br />
treatment combination F2B3S2 which registered the fresh yield <strong>of</strong> 37.70 t ha-1 in pooled<br />
analysis. Lowest fresh yield <strong>of</strong> 28.03 t ha-1 was registered in treatment combination F1B1S1.<br />
Number <strong>of</strong> bulbs per plant, bulb length, bulb diameter, fresh bulb weight and fresh weight <strong>of</strong><br />
bulbs per plant were significantly increased by using medium weight and large bulb weight in<br />
both seasons. This could be a result <strong>of</strong> the positive effect <strong>of</strong> available food reserves in large<br />
bulbs, which might have improved crop establishment and consequently increased growth<br />
characters and subsequently yield attributes like number <strong>of</strong> bulbs per plant, bulb length, bulb<br />
diameter, fresh bulb weight and fresh weight <strong>of</strong> bulbs per plant. Bulb size is related to planting<br />
density and smaller bulbs are formed at closer spacing. Close spacing <strong>of</strong> individual plants suffer<br />
much from competition and the crop may be improved in too wide spacing; however, the yield<br />
per hectares may be reduced because <strong>of</strong> reduction in plant number. The results are in accordance<br />
with findings <strong>of</strong> Faheema et al. (2009) Hussain et al. (2001)<br />
550 | Page Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming, INM, soilmicroorganisms-plant<br />
interactions
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Conclusion<br />
It was observed that different combinations <strong>of</strong> NPK, bulb size and spacing exhibited a significant<br />
influence on all the parameters <strong>of</strong> top onion. Treatment F2B2S2 (100:80:60 NPK kg ha -1 + 5.1-<br />
7.5 g bulb size and 20 x 15 cm spacing) proved superior over rest <strong>of</strong> the treatments with respect<br />
to yield.<br />
References<br />
Faheema, S., Ahmed, N., Hussain, K., Narayan, S., Chattoo, M. A. 2009. Response <strong>of</strong> long day<br />
onion cv. Yellow Globe to different levels <strong>of</strong> nitrogen phosphorus and potassium under<br />
temperate conditions <strong>of</strong> Kashmir Valley. Asian J. Hortic. 4 (1): 131-133.<br />
Hussain, S.W., Ishtiaq, M. and Hussain, S.A. 2001. Effect <strong>of</strong> different bulb sizes and planting<br />
dates on green leaf production on onion (Allium cepa L.). J. Biolog. Scie., 1 (5): 345-<br />
347.<br />
Klass, M. and Freisen, N. 2002. Molecular markers in Allium. In: Rabinowitch, H.D and Currah.<br />
L (eds) Allium Crop Science: Recent Advances. CAB International. 159-185.<br />
Singh, F., Brat, S.V. and Khoshoo, T.N. 1967. Natural Triploidy in Vivi<br />
Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming,<br />
INM, soil-microorganisms-plant interactions<br />
551 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-<br />
CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Bulb Size<br />
(g)<br />
20x10<br />
(S1)<br />
Effect <strong>of</strong> NPK, Bulb size and Spacing on fresh Yield (tha -1 ) <strong>of</strong> Pran (Top Onion)<br />
F1<br />
80:60: 40 Kgha -1 NPK<br />
Spacing(cm)<br />
20x15<br />
(S2)<br />
20x20<br />
(S3)<br />
Mean<br />
-1<br />
Fresh Yield (tha )<br />
20x10<br />
(S1)<br />
F2<br />
100:80:60 NPK Kgha -1<br />
F3<br />
120:100:80 NPKKgha -1<br />
Spacing(cm) Mean Spacing(cm) Mean<br />
20x15<br />
(S2)<br />
2.5-5.0 (B1) 28.03 29.1 27.21 28.11 33.31 34.13 32.6 29.55 33.93 34.34 32.83 28.50 28.72<br />
5.1-7.5 (B2) 29.66 30.88 28.7 29.75 36.12 36.72 35.08 35.69 35.69 36.65 35.05 34.85 33.43<br />
7.6-10 (B3) 30.02 31.31 29.49 30.27 35.93 36.82 35.45 30.27 35.73 36.46 34.58 35.54 33.85<br />
Mean 29.23 30.43 28.46 29.37 33.78 34.81 33.42 33.65 35.00 31.94 31.94 32.96<br />
CD (p< 0.05)<br />
NPK 0.28<br />
Bulb Size 0.28<br />
NPK X Bulb Size 0.50<br />
Spacing 0.28<br />
NPK x Spacing 0.50<br />
Bulb Size x Spacing 0.50<br />
NPK x Bulb Size x Spacing 0.86<br />
20x20<br />
(S3)<br />
20x10<br />
(S1)<br />
20x15<br />
(S2)<br />
20x20<br />
(S3)<br />
Overall<br />
Mean<br />
Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming, INM, soil-microorganisms-plant interactions<br />
552| Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Stress Management in Wheat Crop through Foliar Spray <strong>of</strong> TGA Agro-<br />
Chemical<br />
R. S. Rathore, Dayanand, P. P. Rohilla*, S. K. Singh and V. Nagar<br />
Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Abusar-Jhunjhunu (Raj.)<br />
Swami Keshwanand Rajasthan Agricultural University, Bikaner (Raj.)-333001 (India).<br />
* drpprohilla@gmail.com<br />
T4-47P<br />
Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) is the second most important cereal crop after rice in providing food<br />
and nutritional security to the masses in India. It is the most widely cultivated cereal crop which is<br />
the largest contributor with nearly 30% <strong>of</strong> the world grain production and 50% <strong>of</strong> the world grain<br />
trade. FAO estimated that the world would require additional 198 million tonnes <strong>of</strong> wheat by 2050<br />
to accomplish the future demands, for which wheat production need to be increased by 77% in the<br />
developing countries. Regarding the global climate change in the past few decades, the impact <strong>of</strong><br />
rising temperature on wheat production is gaining concern worldwide. Heat and drought are the<br />
major abiotic stress limiting the wheat production, which are common in semi-arid and arid<br />
region. Keeping the above problem in view total 80 demonstrations on wheat crop were conducted<br />
at farmer’s field in NICRA village Bharu, Jhunjhunu (Rajasthan) during rabi season 2017-18 to<br />
2020-21 for four consecutive years to assess the effect <strong>of</strong> TGA (Thio Glycolic Acid) agrochemical<br />
foliar spray on stress management in wheat crop. TGA is the organic compound, <strong>of</strong>ten called<br />
Mercapto acetic acid (MAA). It contains both thio and carboxylic acid functional groups. It is used<br />
in salt forms including calcium thioglycolate and sodium thioglycolate. Farming situation is<br />
irrigated and soil is sandy loam in Jhunjhunu district. The sowing <strong>of</strong> wheat crop was done from<br />
second week to last week <strong>of</strong> November under irrigated condition. Two foliar spray <strong>of</strong> TGA<br />
agrochemical (100 ppm) on 15 days interval for two times at first and second fortnight in February<br />
month was done by knapsack /power sprayer. Crop was harvested during first/ second week <strong>of</strong><br />
April. The data analyzed revealed that the average gross return and net return was `107636 and<br />
`96495; `59111 and `49043 <strong>of</strong> foliar spray demonstration and local check, respectively. It could be<br />
concluded that average production (12.11 %) and net pr<strong>of</strong>it <strong>of</strong> wheat crop (20.52%) were<br />
increased by foliar spray <strong>of</strong> TGA under field conditions. The total cost <strong>of</strong> TGA agro-chemical<br />
material along with two foliar spray cost was about `500/ha. Hence, two foliar spray <strong>of</strong> TGA agrochemical<br />
at tillering and milking stage in wheat crop could be added in package <strong>of</strong> practices and<br />
motivate the farmers for adoption <strong>of</strong> new techniques for stress management in wheat crop and<br />
getting economic returns.<br />
Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming,<br />
INM, soil-microorganisms-plant interactions<br />
553 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
T4-48P<br />
Biochar: An Effective Soil Amendment to Reduce Emissions and Increase<br />
Crop Productivity<br />
Nitin M. Kumbhar, Narendra M. Tiwatne and Madhav D. Gholkar*<br />
* madhav.gholkar@wotr.org.in<br />
Agricultural soils are mainly treated with chemical inputs to replenish the soil nutrients<br />
consumed by the plants. However, the loss <strong>of</strong> soil organic carbon, one <strong>of</strong> the main constituents to<br />
keep soils fertile and healthy, is never given much importance while managing agricultural soils.<br />
On the other hand, most farmers burn their crop residues in fields that release greenhouse gases.<br />
Burning cotton crop residues is a regular practice in Maharashtra's cotton-growing regions as it<br />
cannot be used as fodder or decomposed into manure for soil incorporation. Converting the<br />
cotton feedstock into biochar and using it for field application is an environmentally sustainable<br />
and economically viable way to manage the crop residue. A field experiment was conducted to<br />
see the effect <strong>of</strong> various combinations <strong>of</strong> biochar, chemical fertilizers, and city waste compost on<br />
wheat soybean cropping system crop productivity. A randomized block design was used to see<br />
the effects <strong>of</strong> biochar on crop productivity. Our study reveals that the application <strong>of</strong> 2.5 tones/ha<br />
<strong>of</strong> biochar increases the crop productivity <strong>of</strong> Soybean by 10 to 20% andwheat by 38 to 55%<br />
compared with conventional farmer practice without biochar application. This also helps in<br />
reducing the GHG emission from crop residue burning. Village-level production and use <strong>of</strong><br />
biochar prepared from cotton feedstock have appeared as an effective technique to avoid the<br />
emissions from agriculture and improve soil health by adding stable carbon in the form <strong>of</strong><br />
biochar.<br />
Temporal Changes in Soil Properties under Intensive Cotton Growing<br />
Vertisols<br />
S. B. Girdekar 1* , P. Chandran 1 , D. Vasu 1 , M.V. Venugopalan 2 and P. Tiwari 1<br />
1 ICAR-National Bureau <strong>of</strong> Soil Survey and Land Use Planning, Nagpur – 440033, India<br />
2 ICAR-Central Institute for Cotton Research, Nagpur<br />
* shubhamsoils1994@gmail.com<br />
T4-49P<br />
The investigation was carried out to evaluate the temporal changes in soil properties under<br />
intensive cotton growing Vertisols in the CICR research farm, Panjri village <strong>of</strong> Nagpur<br />
554 | Page Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming, INM, soilmicroorganisms-plant<br />
interactions
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
(Maharashtra). In the research farm <strong>of</strong> CICR, cotton is being cultivated under different<br />
management practices. Here we have discussed about comparisons <strong>of</strong> the soil properties for<br />
knowing the effect <strong>of</strong> land use and management on the dynamic properties <strong>of</strong> soil. For that<br />
purpose, we have selected three different locations and representative soils were studied under<br />
different management practices viz.1) Organiccultivation with the application <strong>of</strong> vermicompost<br />
and green manuring 2) A soil with inorganic cultivation with the application <strong>of</strong> recommended<br />
dose <strong>of</strong> fertilizer used along with insecticides, and 3) Virgin or undisturbed soil with no crop or<br />
fallow. The soil properties <strong>of</strong> these 3 sites were compared for changes due to management<br />
interventions for surface (0-25cm) and subsurface (25-50cm) layers. The comparisons <strong>of</strong><br />
temporal data indicated that most <strong>of</strong> the dynamic soil properties changed with time in organic,<br />
inorganic and undisturbed soils under cotton cultivation. The sHC decreased in all soils<br />
whereas, organic carbon increased over a period <strong>of</strong> time (23 and 10 %, 23 and 26 %) in surface<br />
and subsurface soils <strong>of</strong> organic and inorganic systems. Bulk density decreased about 15 and 6<br />
% in surface and sub-surface layers <strong>of</strong> soils in organic system. Calcium carbonate has<br />
decreased in organic as well as undisturbed systems whereas in intensively cultivated soil it has<br />
increased.The study shows that the organically managed soil management system had better<br />
yield as compared to other soil management systems. The prevalent system <strong>of</strong> management<br />
practices increased the organic carbon in soils and decreased the BD, sHC and pH <strong>of</strong> soils and<br />
inorganic carbon tends to increase in soils. These trends <strong>of</strong> changes in soil properties could be a<br />
threat to the cotton cultivation. These issues need to be handled with proper management<br />
intervention.<br />
T4-50P<br />
Effect <strong>of</strong> Different Levels <strong>of</strong> Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potash on Yield, Yield<br />
Attributes and Economic <strong>of</strong> Bt. Cotton under Rainfed Conditions<br />
P. D. Vekariya, V. D. Vora*, S. C. Kaneria, D. S. Hirpara, M.M. Talapada, K. S. Jotangiya<br />
and R.J. Chaudhary<br />
Main Dry Farming Research Station, Junagadh Agricultural University, Targhadia<br />
(Rajkot-360 023)<br />
* vdvora@jau.in<br />
An experiment was under taken on “Nutrient management in Bt. cotton under rain fed conditions<br />
“on medium black clayey soil <strong>of</strong> North Saurashtra region <strong>of</strong> Gujarat at Dry farming research<br />
station, Junagadh Agricultural University, KukadaduringKharif 2013-14 to 2020-21. The<br />
experiment was laid out in factorial randomizedblock design with three replications. The<br />
Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming,<br />
INM, soil-microorganisms-plant interactions<br />
555 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
experiment consists <strong>of</strong> three levels <strong>of</strong> nitrogen viz.; N60- 60 kg N/ha, N80- 80 kg N/ha and N100-<br />
100 kg N/ha, two levels <strong>of</strong> phosphorus P0- 0 kg P2O5/ha andP30- 30 kg P2O5/ha and two levels <strong>of</strong><br />
potash K0- 0 kg K2O/ha and K60- 60 kg K2O/ha thus, twelve treatment combinations. On the<br />
basis <strong>of</strong> pooled results the seed cotton and stalk yield <strong>of</strong> Bt.cotton were significantly influenced<br />
by the various levels <strong>of</strong> nitrogen, phosphorus and potash. The application <strong>of</strong> nitrogen 100 kg,<br />
phosphorus 30 kg and potash 60 kg/ha significantly increased the seed cotton yield (2081, 2051<br />
and 2039 kg/ha, respectively) and stalk yield (3192, 3177 and 3193 kg/ha, respectively) <strong>of</strong><br />
Bt.cotton.While in growth and yield attributing parameters like plant height, number <strong>of</strong><br />
monopodia, sympodia and balls/plant significantly increased with the application <strong>of</strong> 100 kg N/ha<br />
and 30 kg P2O5/ha, but application <strong>of</strong> 60 kg K2O/ha significantly increased only number <strong>of</strong><br />
sympodia/plant. The post harvest soil fertility like pH, EC and organic carbon content <strong>of</strong> soil<br />
were not influenced significantly due to different levels <strong>of</strong> nitrogen, phosphorus and potash.<br />
Significantly higher value <strong>of</strong> available status <strong>of</strong> nitrogen and phosphorus in soil were recorded<br />
with application <strong>of</strong> 100 kg N, 30 kg P2O5 and 60 kg K2O, but application <strong>of</strong> 60 kg K2O/ha<br />
significantly increased available potash content in soil. Maximum net return was recorded<br />
withapplication <strong>of</strong> nitrogen 100 kg, phosphorus 30 kg and potash 60 kg/ha, respectively.<br />
Effect <strong>of</strong> Long Term INM On SOC Stock, Yield Sustainability and Its<br />
T4-51P<br />
Relationship with Soil Quality Attributes Under Cotton + Greengram (1:1)<br />
Intercropping System in Vertisols<br />
V.V. Gabhane 1 , P.R. Ramteke 1 , R.S. Patode 1 , M.M. Ganvir 1 , A.R. Tupe, A.B. Chorey and<br />
G. Ravindra Chary 2<br />
1 AICRP for Dryland Agriculture, Dr. Panjabrao Deshmukh Krishi Vidyapeeth,<br />
Akola-444 104, Maharashtra<br />
2 AICRPDA, ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
The present study was conducted during 2021-2022 on a long term field experiment initiated<br />
during 1987-88 at AICRP for Dryland Agriculture, Dr. Panjabrao Deshmukh Krishi Vidyapeeth,<br />
Akola, Maharashtra, with eight treatment combinations including a control, two sole organics<br />
treatments, two sole inorganics, and three treatments <strong>of</strong> integration <strong>of</strong> organics to substitute for<br />
the fertilizer N requirement in cotton + greengram (1:1) intercropping system under semi-arid<br />
agro-ecosystem in Vidarbha region <strong>of</strong> Maharashtra. The results after 35 th cycle revealed that<br />
partial substitution <strong>of</strong> nitrogen either by farmyard manure (FYM) or gliricidia along with<br />
chemical fertilizers improved the soil quality attributes and crop productivity in terms <strong>of</strong><br />
556 | Page Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming, INM, soilmicroorganisms-plant<br />
interactions
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
sustainable yield index and system productivity. The rate <strong>of</strong> change in SOC stock under different<br />
nutrient management practices was calculated, which revealed that, the rate <strong>of</strong> change was<br />
negative for control, and sole organic treated plots, while it was positive in rest <strong>of</strong> the treatments<br />
with highest build-up in INM treatments. The sustainable yield index (SYI) was higher with<br />
partial substitution <strong>of</strong> nitrogen either by farmyard manure (FYM) or gliricidia along with<br />
chemical fertilizers. Furthermore, the system productivity under treatment substitution <strong>of</strong><br />
nitrogen either through gliricidia along with chemical fertilizers, or by farmyard manure (FYM)<br />
was 80% higher over control and 14 and 19% higher over 100% RDF, respectively. The Pearson<br />
correlation matrix between soil properties and system productivity revealed that, all the assessed<br />
soil properties were highly positively correlated with system productivity except for BD, pH and<br />
EC. Additionally, the management sensitive biological properties <strong>of</strong> soil such as, MBC, DHA,<br />
Alkaline phosphatase also had strong positive correlation with available nutrients and SOC.<br />
Sustainable soil management for resilient rainfed agro-ecosystem: conservation agriculture, organic farming,<br />
INM, soil-microorganisms-plant interactions<br />
557 | Page
Resource conservation and rainfed<br />
agriculture<br />
Theme– 4a
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Theme – 4a: Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture<br />
List <strong>of</strong> <strong>Extended</strong> Summaries<br />
S.No. Title First Author ID<br />
1. Zero tillage-based in-situ rice straw management to<br />
reduce in GHGs emission and build up labile carbon<br />
pool in lowland rice<br />
2. Conjuctive use <strong>of</strong> organic and inorganic fertilizers for<br />
rabi sorghum<br />
3. Response <strong>of</strong> sorghum to different levels <strong>of</strong> nitrogen and<br />
phosphorus under conserved soil moisture in Ghed area<br />
<strong>of</strong> Gujarat<br />
4. In-situ rainwater harvesting techniques and<br />
diversification <strong>of</strong> cropping system for climate resilient<br />
agriculture in Bundelkhand region<br />
5. Gliricidia Green Leaf Manure as a Source <strong>of</strong> Potassium<br />
for Improvement in Soil Quality and Sustaining<br />
Rainfed Cotton Productivity in Vertisols <strong>of</strong> Central<br />
India<br />
6. Conjunctive use <strong>of</strong> zeolite and urea to minimize<br />
nitrogen loss and enhance nutrient availability and<br />
maize productivity in Alfisols<br />
7. Effect <strong>of</strong> conservation agriculture and balanced<br />
nutrition on system productivity, pr<strong>of</strong>itability and<br />
mitigating GHGs emission in maize-horsegram<br />
sequence in rainfed Alfisols<br />
8. Effect <strong>of</strong> conservation agriculture and mineral nitrogen<br />
levels on soil aggregate stability indices and associated<br />
carbon in rainfed maize (Zea mays L.) - pigeonpea<br />
(Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.) crop rotation under<br />
Alfisols<br />
9. Growth and Yield <strong>of</strong> Groundnut as influenced by<br />
Moisture Stress at different Phenophases<br />
10. Impact <strong>of</strong> Zero tillage over conventional tillage in<br />
Kushinagar District <strong>of</strong> Utter Pradesh<br />
11. Nutrient Dynamics in Conservation Agriculture under<br />
Rainfed Conditions<br />
12. Co-application <strong>of</strong> biochar and inorganic fertilizer<br />
improves soil fertility and crop productivity in maizegroundnut<br />
cropping system in semi-arid Alfisols<br />
13. Assessment <strong>of</strong> soil physical properties from different<br />
blocks <strong>of</strong> Jaipur district, Rajasthan, India<br />
14. Appraisal <strong>of</strong> some soil physical properties and<br />
available micronutrients under organic and<br />
conventional farming systems in an Inceptisol<br />
Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture<br />
SP Parida<br />
VM Amrutsagar<br />
VD Vora<br />
T4a-01O-1256<br />
T4a-02O-1242<br />
T4a-03O-1012<br />
Yogeshwar Singh T4a-03aO -<br />
1512<br />
VV Gabhane<br />
V Girijaveni<br />
Sumanta Kundu<br />
AK Indoria<br />
Radha Kumari<br />
Ashok Rai<br />
PS Prabhamani<br />
KC Nataraja<br />
Surykant sharma<br />
Priyanka Meena<br />
T4a-04O-1151<br />
T4a-05R-1244<br />
T4a-06R-1227<br />
T4a-07R-1015<br />
T4a-08R-1187<br />
T4a-09R-1443<br />
T4a-10R-1235<br />
T4a-11R-1127<br />
T4a-12P-1031<br />
T4a-13P-1301<br />
15. Conservation agriculture approach as climate change Pooja Jena T4a-14P-1580<br />
558 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
S.No. Title First Author ID<br />
mitigation<br />
16. Conservation Agriculture in Himalayan States <strong>of</strong> India:<br />
Prospects and Research Challenges Ahead<br />
17. Direct seeding in Rice: A resource Conservation<br />
Technology in Scarce Rainfall zone <strong>of</strong> Kurnool district,<br />
A.P.<br />
18. Effect <strong>of</strong> bioregulators along with organics on growth<br />
and yield <strong>of</strong> Gundumalli (Jasminum sambacait.)<br />
19. Effect <strong>of</strong> life saving irrigation on yield and economics<br />
<strong>of</strong> different kharif and rabi crops under dryland<br />
conditions<br />
20. Effect <strong>of</strong> long-term conservation agriculture on labile<br />
and total soil organic carbon fractions <strong>of</strong> rainfed pearl<br />
millet-based cropping systems <strong>of</strong> India<br />
21. Effect <strong>of</strong> organic and inorganic nutrient management<br />
practices on growth and yield <strong>of</strong> maize under subtropical<br />
kandi area Jammu region<br />
22. Effect <strong>of</strong> carbon sources <strong>of</strong> nutrients on yield; and soil<br />
properties <strong>of</strong> soybean<br />
23. Effect <strong>of</strong> paddy straw mulching and tillage on growth<br />
and yield <strong>of</strong> Pea (Pisum sativum L.)<br />
24. Effect <strong>of</strong> Tillage and Residue Management on Yield <strong>of</strong><br />
blackgram – rabi sorghum sequence grown on<br />
Inceptisol under rainfed condition<br />
25. Effect <strong>of</strong> tillage practices and mulching on Rabi<br />
sorghum crop under rainfed condition<br />
26. Effect <strong>of</strong> tillage practices and mulching operations on<br />
productivity <strong>of</strong> maize under dryland conditions<br />
27. Effect <strong>of</strong> tillage practices and nitrogen fertilizer levels<br />
on soil total carbon, bulk density and porosity in<br />
rainfed maize-pigeonpea crop rotation under semi-arid<br />
tropical climate<br />
28. Effect <strong>of</strong> various organic sources <strong>of</strong> nutrients on growth<br />
and yield <strong>of</strong> tomato<br />
29. Energy Efficient tillage and nutrient management for<br />
rabi sorghum on Inceptisol<br />
30. Enhancing productivity <strong>of</strong> rainfed maize through<br />
different planting methods and moisture conservation<br />
practices in Shivalik foothill region <strong>of</strong> Punjab<br />
31. Escaping moisture stress in steep slopes by altering the<br />
time <strong>of</strong> planting (early sowing) in Garden Pea<br />
32. Growth and Growth Parameters <strong>of</strong> Soybean influenced<br />
by different Land Configuration and Crop Residue<br />
Management Practices<br />
Raman Jeet Singh T4a-15P-1061<br />
M Sudhakar<br />
V Velmurugan<br />
K Tiwari<br />
Amresh<br />
Chaudhary<br />
Brinder Singh<br />
Jawale<br />
V Akashe<br />
Zhimomi<br />
NJ Ranshur<br />
Arun Kumar<br />
Pramod Kumar<br />
AKIndoria<br />
SV Uphade<br />
SK Upadhye<br />
Mandeep Kaur<br />
Ajith Kumar<br />
Singh<br />
SS Kinge<br />
T4a-16P-1221<br />
T4a-17P-1467<br />
T4a-18P-1226<br />
T4a-19P-1205<br />
T4a-20P-1324<br />
T4a-21P<br />
T4a-22P-1460<br />
T4a-23P-1102<br />
T4a-24P-1338<br />
T4a-25P-1014<br />
T4a-26P-1059<br />
T4a-27P-1091<br />
T4a-28P-1207<br />
T4a-29P-1540<br />
T4a-30P-1578<br />
T4a-31P-1317<br />
559 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
S.No. Title First Author ID<br />
33. Impact <strong>of</strong> application <strong>of</strong> Organics, Bi<strong>of</strong>ertilizers on Soil<br />
Nutrient status and Quality parameter <strong>of</strong> Rabi Sorghum<br />
34. Impact <strong>of</strong> zinc and iron enriched organic manures on<br />
rabi grain sorghum<br />
35. Improvement <strong>of</strong> soil fertility and Productivity by use <strong>of</strong><br />
Green Manuring<br />
36. Influence <strong>of</strong> Different In-Situ Soil Moisture<br />
Conservation Techniques in Maize under Rainfed<br />
Agro-Eco System <strong>of</strong> Jammu Region<br />
37. Influence <strong>of</strong> medicinal crops used as groundcover<br />
management <strong>of</strong> guava orchard on soil properties <strong>of</strong><br />
Northern India<br />
38. Influence <strong>of</strong> natural farming on soil properties, crop<br />
protection and production <strong>of</strong> quality produce in<br />
Sugarcane<br />
39. In-situ moisture conservation techniques for timely<br />
sowing <strong>of</strong> Wheat crop in Rabi season under Kandi<br />
areas <strong>of</strong> District Kathua<br />
40. Nutrient Management in Soybean Based Double<br />
Cropping Systems under Residual Moisture<br />
41. Nutrient Management practices in finger millet under<br />
zero tillage conditions in rice fallows<br />
42. Partial Substitution <strong>of</strong> Nutrients through Gliricidia<br />
Green Manuring to Cotton under Conservation Tillage,<br />
a Cost-Effective Alternative for Soil Quality,<br />
Productivity and Economic Sustainability <strong>of</strong> Rainfed<br />
Cotton in Vertisols <strong>of</strong> Central India<br />
43. Performance <strong>of</strong> castor to different levels <strong>of</strong> nitrogen<br />
and phosphorus under conserved soil moisture in Ghed<br />
area <strong>of</strong> Gujarat<br />
44. Performance <strong>of</strong> maize (Zea mays) under late planting<br />
condition in organic production mode in rainfed<br />
condition <strong>of</strong> Meghalaya<br />
45. Response <strong>of</strong> Soybean (Glycine max (L).) to the<br />
Organic Sources <strong>of</strong> Nutrients<br />
46. Soil Moisture Availability in Alfisol as Influenced by<br />
Crop Residue Application under Minimum Tillage<br />
47. Soil moisture stress alters the abundance <strong>of</strong> maize root<br />
associated bacteria<br />
48. Soil organic carbon sequestration potential under the<br />
changing climatic scenarios in different<br />
agroecosystems <strong>of</strong> India<br />
49. Sustaining Cotton Productivity and Soil Health with<br />
Conjoint Use <strong>of</strong> Organic and Inorganic Sources under<br />
Cotton based Intercropping Systems on Vertisols in<br />
Kuruva Mounika<br />
T Bhagavatha<br />
Priya<br />
Debesh singh<br />
Jai Kumar<br />
Manpreet Singh<br />
KV Ramana<br />
Murthy<br />
Vishal Sharma<br />
Pradeep Kumar<br />
Y Sandhya Rani<br />
BA Sonune<br />
DS Hirpara<br />
Amit Anil<br />
Shahane<br />
AK Gore<br />
K Sammi Reddy<br />
M Manjunath<br />
K Nishant Sinha<br />
DV Mali<br />
T4a-32P-1314<br />
T4a-33P-1276<br />
T4a-34P<br />
T4a-35P-1325<br />
T4a-36P-1250<br />
T4a-37P-1318<br />
T4a-38P-1461<br />
T4a-39P-1329<br />
T4a-40P-1387<br />
T4a-41P-1304<br />
T4a-42P-1047<br />
T4a-43P-1289<br />
T4a-44P-1155<br />
T4a-45P-1230<br />
T4a-46P-1055<br />
T4a-47P-1196<br />
T4a-48P-1305<br />
Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture<br />
560 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
S.No. Title First Author ID<br />
Central India<br />
50. Sustaining Soil Health through Organic Farming RS Choudhary T4a-49P-1427<br />
51. Type <strong>of</strong> organic manure and biochar affected crop<br />
production and soil health in maize-black gram system<br />
under changing climate<br />
52. Vermicomposting-A module for Sustainable soil<br />
Management in South Garo Hills, Meghalaya, India<br />
53. Weedy rice: A threat to sustainable rice production<br />
under direct seeding<br />
54. Yield and nutrient uptake <strong>of</strong> direct seeded rice under<br />
different tillage and nutrient management practices<br />
55. Zero Tillage Technique with High Yielding Variety <strong>of</strong><br />
Wheat Cultivation as Compared to Traditional practices <strong>of</strong><br />
farmers field in Front line demonstration under NICRA <strong>of</strong><br />
Morena district M.P.<br />
56. Paired row method <strong>of</strong> cultivation in maize – a water<br />
conservation technology for sustainable yields and<br />
higher net returns<br />
57. Improving productivity <strong>of</strong> Taramira (Eruca sativa<br />
Mill.) under conserved soil moisture in arid<br />
environments<br />
58. Influence <strong>of</strong> Organic and Inorganic Nutrients on<br />
Nitrogen & Potassium Fractions In Relation to Yield <strong>of</strong><br />
Elephant Foot Yam - Blackgram System<br />
Shaon Kumar<br />
Das<br />
Titus Dalang<br />
T4a-50P-1261<br />
T4a-51P-1176<br />
V. Anjaly T4a-52P-1137<br />
P Manoj Kumar<br />
RS Tomar<br />
K Ravi Kumar<br />
M Patidar<br />
KV Aswin<br />
T4a-53P-1546<br />
T4a-54P-1411<br />
T4a-55P-1579<br />
T4a-56P-1567<br />
T4a-57P-1367<br />
561 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
T4a-01O-1256<br />
Zero Tillage-based in-situ rice Straw Management to Reduce in GHGs Emission and<br />
Build Up Labile Carbon Pool in Lowland Rice<br />
S. P. Parida, P. Bhattacharyya, S.R Padhy, A. Das, S. Swain and S. K. Nayak<br />
ICAR- National Rice Research Institute, Cuttack Odisha-753006, India<br />
Total rice straw production currently stands at 731 million tonnes, with a distribution <strong>of</strong> 1.7,<br />
3.9, 20.9, 37.2 and 667.6 million tonnes in Oceania, Europe, Africa, America, and Asia<br />
country respectively. In India, rice straw production is not lesser than 126.6 million tonnes<br />
(Bhattacharyya et.al., 2019). Handling the huge straw is an issue particularly in north-west<br />
India where wheat is shown just after 20-25 days <strong>of</strong> rice harvest. Lack <strong>of</strong> economically viable<br />
alternative options to utilize straw, the rice farmers in India especially from the northern<br />
states <strong>of</strong> Punjab and Haryana choose to burn the straw in their fields. Even more alarming is<br />
the fact that the practice <strong>of</strong> rice straw burning is spreading rapidly in eastern Indian states like<br />
West Bengal, Odisha, Bihar, and Jharkhand. Nearly 16% <strong>of</strong> crop residues are burnt on farms<br />
in India <strong>of</strong> which 60% is rice straw for recent decades, rice straw burning is <strong>of</strong> serious<br />
concern as it causes sever air pollution, nutrient and biodiversity losses. Recent estimates<br />
showed that from November to December in last 4-5 years, straw burn contributed to nearly<br />
70% <strong>of</strong> air pollution in the national capital region <strong>of</strong> India. Burning primarily causes the<br />
emission <strong>of</strong> harmful gases and particulate matter which increases air pollution and<br />
greenhouse gas/ carbon footprint significantly. So, we need to find out economically viable,<br />
socially acceptable, and eco-friendly solutions for the alternative uses <strong>of</strong> rice straw. In-situ<br />
management is one <strong>of</strong> the viable options <strong>of</strong> straw management. However, in-situ retention<br />
and subsequent incorporation in soil may cause GHGs emission in lowland rice along with<br />
carbon build up. The objective <strong>of</strong> the study was to assess the effect the in-situ straw<br />
management on soil carbon pools, enzymatic activities and GHGs emission in lowland rice.<br />
Methodology<br />
We have conducted a field experiment at ICAR-NRRI experimental fields (B13, 14 ab Block)<br />
during Kharif season 2021 for in-situ management <strong>of</strong> rice straw. Four treatment viz., (i)<br />
Immediate incorporation <strong>of</strong> rice straw after harvesting (IIRS) (T1), (ii) Zero tillage (with<br />
glyphosate spray) (T2), (iii) Spreading <strong>of</strong> straw over the field (T3) and (iv) Zero tillage with<br />
straw retention (T4) (without glyphosate spray) were imposed in the field randomly with five<br />
replications as shown in both table and figure. The soil labile carbon pools- microbial<br />
biomass carbon (MBC); readily mineralizable carbon (RMC), enzymatic activities {βglucosidase,<br />
dehydrogenase activity (DHA) and fluorescein diacetate activity (FDA)} and<br />
GHGs {carbon dioxide (CO 2), methane (CH 4), nitrous oxide (N 2O)} were estimated in all treatments<br />
after the imposition <strong>of</strong> the treatments at an interval <strong>of</strong> 3, 8,13, 18, 23, 28, 33 and 38 days.<br />
Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture<br />
562 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Results<br />
The readily mineralizable carbons (RMC) and microbial biomass carbons (MBC) were<br />
increased from 8 days <strong>of</strong> treatment imposition to 28 days then decreased at 38 days<br />
irrespective <strong>of</strong> treatments. The labile carbon and soil enzymatic activities (β-glucosidase,<br />
DHA and FDA) were found higher in IIRS (T1), followed by SRS (T3), ZT (T2) and ZT+SR<br />
(T4) (Table-2). The MBC and RMC values for IIRS, ZT, SRS and ZT+SR treatments were<br />
found to be 338.7, 305.9, 323.5, 285.7 µg Cg -1 and 243.6, 218.3, 230.5, 210 µg Cg -1<br />
respectively. The β-glucosidase activity for IIRS, ZT, SRS and ZT+SR was found to be 14.9,<br />
11.9, 13.9 and 11.1 respectively. FDA and DHA for the same treatments vis-à-vis IIRS, ZT,<br />
SRS and ZT+SR were 4.2, 3.1, 3.7, 2.7 and 122.4, 100.9, 110.8, 94.3 respectively. The<br />
methane emission was higher in IIRS (T1) flowed by SRS (T3), ZT (T2) and ZT+ST (T4)<br />
(Figure 2). The CO2 and CH4 emissions were increased from 3 to 18 days <strong>of</strong> treatment<br />
imposition and then decreased slowly. The CO 2 and N 2O (Figure 2) emissions trends were<br />
the same. However, in the treatment <strong>of</strong> IIRS, the methane emission was higher than that <strong>of</strong><br />
SRS. All the GHGs (CO 2, CH 4 and N 2O) emissions were relatively less in zero tillage (ZT).<br />
Enzymatic activity details after different treatment imposition<br />
Treatment<br />
Microbial<br />
biomass carbon<br />
(µg C g -1 )<br />
Readily<br />
mineralizable<br />
carbons (µg C<br />
g -1 )<br />
β-<br />
glucosidase<br />
(µg pNP g -<br />
1<br />
h -1 )<br />
Fluorescein<br />
diacetate activity<br />
(µg fluorescein g -<br />
1<br />
h -1 )<br />
Dehydrogen<br />
ase activity<br />
(µg TPF g -1<br />
d -1 )<br />
IIRS 338.7 243.6 14.9 4.2 122.4<br />
ZT 305.9 218.3 11.9 3.1 100.9<br />
SRS 323.5 230.5 13.9 3.7 110.8<br />
ZT+SR 285.7 210.0 11.1 2.7 94.3<br />
Conclusion<br />
In-situ management <strong>of</strong> straw should be promoted through zero-tillage based practices rather<br />
than direct incorporation in the field as it reduces the GHGs emissions and build labile carbon<br />
pools in the soils during decomposition straw in the field. These practices also have good<br />
climate change mitigation potential.<br />
563 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
GHGs flux after different treatment imposition in different days interval<br />
References<br />
Kaur, D., Bhardwaj, N.K. and Lohchab, R.K., 2017. Prospects <strong>of</strong> rice straw as a raw material<br />
for paper making. Waste Management, 60, pp.127-139.<br />
Bhattacharyya, P., Bisen, J., Bhaduri, D., Priyadarsini, S., Munda, S., Chakraborti, M., Adak,<br />
T., Panneerselvam, P., Mukherjee, A.K., Swain, S.L. and Dash, P.K., 2021. Turn the<br />
wheel from waste to wealth: Economic and environmental gain <strong>of</strong> sustainable rice<br />
straw management practices over field burning about India. Science <strong>of</strong> The Total<br />
Environment, 775, p.145896.<br />
Dash PK, Padhy SR, Bhattacharyya P, Pattanayak A, Routray S, Panneerselvam P, Nayak<br />
AK, Pathak H. Efficient lignin decomposing microbial consortium to hasten rice-straw<br />
composting with moderate GHGs fluxes. Waste and Biomass Valorization. 2022<br />
Jan;13(1):481-96.<br />
Otero-Jimenez V, del Pilar Carreno-Carreno J, Barreto-Hernandez E, van Elsas JD, Uribe-<br />
Velez D. Impact <strong>of</strong> rice straw management strategies on rice rhizosphere microbiomes.<br />
Applied Soil Ecology. 2021 Nov 1;167:104036.<br />
Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture<br />
564 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
T4a-02O-1242<br />
Conjuctive use <strong>of</strong> Organic and Inorganic Fertilizers for Rabi Sorghum<br />
V. M. Amrutsagar, S. K. Upadhye, N. B. More, G. Ravindra Chary, Archana B. Pawar,<br />
D. K. Kathmale, I. R. Bagwan and B. S. Kadam<br />
AICRP for Dryland Agriculture, Main Center, Solapur- 413 002 Maharashtra<br />
zarssolapur@gmail.com<br />
It is the today’s need to select and prioritize climate resilient technologies that are sustainable<br />
for the rainfed and dryland areas. The technologies should minimize the effect <strong>of</strong> extreme<br />
climate events such as drought, flood, change in rainfall pattern, heat and cold waves, etc.<br />
Considering the climate change effects observed severe damage and risk in the cultivation <strong>of</strong><br />
rainfed and irrigated field crops. Organic + inorganic fertilizer management is a most<br />
appropriate system <strong>of</strong> agriculture (Sharma, 1992.) Similar to regenerative agriculture, that<br />
encourage healthy soils and crops through such a practices as untried recycling <strong>of</strong> organic<br />
matter (compost/ crop residues) crop rotation, proper tillage and minimum / optimum use <strong>of</strong><br />
inorganic fertilizers and pesticides. It is therefore the present investigation was undertaken<br />
with the objectives viz., to study the feasibility <strong>of</strong> use <strong>of</strong> crop residue, green loppings and<br />
FYM with and without inorganic fertilizers in the field and its subsequent effect on crop<br />
yield, to assess its effect on physico-chemical and biological properties <strong>of</strong> soil and to study<br />
the economics.<br />
Methodology<br />
A long-term field experiment was initiated during 1987-88 at All India Coordinated Research<br />
Project for Dryland Agriculture, Main Center, Solapur on medium black soil (Vertic<br />
Ustropepts). The experiment is continued for 35 years (2021-22) on the same site with ten<br />
treatments with three replications in Randomized Block Design without disturbing the<br />
original layout. The treatments tried are : T1 - 0 kg N ha -1 control, T2 - 25 kg N ha -1 urea, T3 -<br />
50 kg N ha -1 –urea, T 4 - 25 kg N ha -1 CR (crop residues-byre waste), T 5 - 25 kg N ha -1 –FYM<br />
(farm yard manure), T6 - 25 kg N ha -1 CR + 25 kg N ha -1 urea, T7 - 25 kg N ha -1 FYM +25<br />
kg N ha -1 urea, T8 - 25 kg N ha -1 CR+25 kg N ha -1 Leucaena loppings , T9 - 25 kg N ha -1<br />
Leucaena loppings, T 10 - 25 kg N ha -1 Leucaena loppings + 25 kg N ha -1 urea. The physicochemical<br />
properties <strong>of</strong> soil, rainwater use efficiency (RWUE) and nutrient uptake <strong>of</strong> rRabi<br />
sorghum were studied. The initial soil status was low in soil fertility (Ava. N- 137 and P 2O 5 –<br />
11.5 kg ha -1 ) and DTPA extractable micronutrients (mg kg -1 ) Fe (2.95), Zn (0.49) and Cu<br />
(0.50).<br />
565 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Results<br />
At 35 th year <strong>of</strong> experimentation the treatment T 7 (25 kg N ha -1 FYM+ 25 kg N ha -1 Urea) gave<br />
significantly higher grain (19.25 q ha -1 ) and stover (40.42 q ha -1 ) yield, net monetary returns<br />
(Rs. 39525 ha -1 ) with B: C ratio (2.25), RWUE (32.08 kg ha -1 mm -1 ). The nutrients uptake by<br />
Rabi sorghum as well as rain water use efficiency and residual soil fertility (major and micro<br />
nutrients) were also increased as shown in the table. The N fixers and P solubilizers count<br />
was more under Leucaena application either alone or with crop residue or FYM. Nishimura<br />
(1994) reported that green gram as a mulch-cum-manure to rabi sorghum increased the gross<br />
pr<strong>of</strong>it by 132 per cent. Conjoint use <strong>of</strong> FYM and chemical fertilizers on soybean-safflower<br />
sequence cropping showed that the half <strong>of</strong> recommended fertilizers (10 N + 40 P 2O 5 ha -1 + 6<br />
tonnes FYM) gave highest yield <strong>of</strong> soybean and safflower (Sharma, 1992). Reddy et al.<br />
(1991) also reported similar trend <strong>of</strong> results i.e., 75 per cent substitution <strong>of</strong> chemical N with<br />
use <strong>of</strong> Leucaena leucocphala gave higher bio mass and yield <strong>of</strong> sorghum.<br />
Conclusion<br />
From the above study it can be concluded that, the nitrogen requirement <strong>of</strong> rRabi sorghum<br />
can be fulfilled by conjoint use <strong>of</strong> organic (50 %) and inorganic fertilizers (50 %) or equally<br />
effective treatment i.e., 50 % N ha -1 through CR + 50% N ha -1 through Leucanea lopping<br />
which maintan the better soil health, RWUE and microbial count. This can be way forward to<br />
make organic farming in rainfed area that conserve natural resources and make farming more<br />
resilient and less dependent on chemical inputs.<br />
Effect <strong>of</strong> recycling <strong>of</strong> different organics on yield and RWUE by grain and stover <strong>of</strong> rabi<br />
Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture<br />
sorghum (2021-22)<br />
Treatment Yield (q ha -1 ) Cost <strong>of</strong><br />
Cult n<br />
Rs/ha<br />
Grain<br />
2021-<br />
22<br />
Stover<br />
2021-<br />
22<br />
Mean<br />
Grain<br />
(35years)<br />
Mean<br />
Stover<br />
(35years)<br />
Net<br />
Returns<br />
Rs/ha<br />
B:C<br />
Ratio<br />
RWUE<br />
(Kg<br />
ha -1<br />
mm -1 )<br />
0 kg N ha -1 –control 7.72 16.23 5.77 15.72 24595 3892 1.16 12.86<br />
25 kg N ha -1 –urea 8.65 18.07 7.60 20.62 24916 6944 1.28 14.41<br />
50 kg N ha -1 –urea 10.97 25.75 9.30 23.86 25238 16608 1.66 18.29<br />
25 kg N ha -1 –CR 9.28 19.48 8.11 20.62 28762 5469 1.19 15.46<br />
25 kg N ha -1 –FYM 10.29 21.53 9.03 22.38 31174 6748 1.22 17.14<br />
25 kg N ha -1 -CR +25 kg N ha -1<br />
–urea<br />
25 kg N ha -1 - FYM +25 kg N ha -<br />
1<br />
urea<br />
25 kg N ha -1 –CR +25 kg N ha -1<br />
–Leucaena loppings<br />
14.58 30.61 10.86 25.92 29083 24705 1.85 24.29<br />
19.25 40.42 12.84 28.21 31495 39525 2.25 32.08<br />
18.23 38.28 12.15 27.34 31967 35289 2.10 30.38<br />
25 kg N ha -1 -Leucaena loppings 8.61 18.09 8.23 20.30 27800 3983 1.14 14.36<br />
25 kg N ha -1 -Leucaena 12.26 25.76 10.80 24.54 28121 17130 1.61 20.44<br />
566 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
loppings+25 kg N ha -1 –urea<br />
SE+ 0.56 1.63 -- -- 2219.1 -- --<br />
CD at 5% 1.69 4.88 -- -- 6644.5 -- --<br />
Effect <strong>of</strong> treatments on soil chemical properties at harvest (2021-22).<br />
Treatments pH EC Available Nutrients<br />
(kg/ha)<br />
DTPA extractable<br />
micronutrients (ppm)<br />
N P K Fe Mn Zn Cu<br />
0 kg N ha -1 –control 7.96 0.47 119.00 16.18 681.00 2.55 4.29 0.18 0.52<br />
25 kg N ha -1 –urea 7.78 0.56 159.67 21.78 819.33 3.48 5.90 0.38 1.36<br />
50 kg N ha -1 –urea 7.95 0.58 168.67 24.38 883.00 4.34 6.45 0.32 1.26<br />
25 kg N ha -1 –CR 7.42 0.61 180.00 34.57 951.00 4.46 6.58 0.45 1.34<br />
25 kg N ha -1 –FYM 7.31 0.66 184.00 30.83 969.00 4.47 7.59 0.47 1.37<br />
25 kg N ha -1 -CR +25 kg N ha -1<br />
–urea<br />
25 kg N ha -1 - FYM +25 kg N ha -<br />
1<br />
urea<br />
25 kg N ha -1 –CR +25 kg N ha -1<br />
–Leucaena loppings<br />
7.20 0.68 190.00 31.43 974.33 4.65 7.65 0.60 1.49<br />
7.22 0.70 203.00 35.22 993.00 4.81 7.64 0.61 1.51<br />
7.20 0.74 203.67 39.31 996.00 4.72 8.00 0.63 1.54<br />
25 kg N ha -1 -Leucaena loppings 7.28 0.71 180.00 31.30 868.67 4.40 7.94 0.51 1.32<br />
25 kg N ha -1 -Leucaena loppings<br />
+25 kg N ha -1 –urea<br />
7.30 0.72 189.00 33.66 885.67 3.79 7.43 0.49 1.23<br />
SE+ 0.01 0.01 0.79 0.45 2.04 0.02 0.02 0.01 0.01<br />
CD at 5% NS NS 2.29 1.31 5.89 NS NS NS NS<br />
Initial Values (2013-14) 8.1 0.49 137 11.5 592 2.95 12.6 0.49 0.50<br />
References<br />
Nishimura, Y. 1994. An improved technology <strong>of</strong> rainfed farming in the semi arid tropics.<br />
Japanese J. Trop. Agri. 38:103<br />
Reddy, G. S., Venkateshwaralu, B., and. Vittal, K. P. R. 1991. Effect <strong>of</strong> substitution <strong>of</strong><br />
fertilizer nitrogen with subabul (Leucaena leucocephela) leaves on growth and yield <strong>of</strong><br />
sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) in an alfisol. Indian J. Agril. Sci. 61:316.<br />
Sharma, R. A. 1992. Efficient water use and sustainable production <strong>of</strong> rainfed soybean and<br />
safflower through conjunctive use <strong>of</strong> organic and fertilizers. Crop. Res.181.<br />
567 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
T4a-03O-1012<br />
Response <strong>of</strong> Sorghum to Different Levels <strong>of</strong> Nitrogen and Phosphorus under Conserved<br />
Soil Moisture in Ghed AREA <strong>of</strong> Gujarat<br />
V. D. Vora * , R. B. Thanki, P. D. Vekariya, S. C. Kaneriya and D. S. Hirpara<br />
Main Dry Farming Research Station, Junagadh Agricultural University, Gujarat, 360 023 India<br />
*vdvora@jau.in<br />
Sorghum (Sorghum bicolar) is the fifth most important world cereal following wheat, maize,<br />
rice, and barley, used for food, fodder, production <strong>of</strong> alcoholic beverages and bio fuels and is<br />
the dietary staple for more than 500 million people in 30 countries with an area <strong>of</strong> 40 million<br />
ha (Avilkumar et al., 2016). Sorghum, because <strong>of</strong> its drought resistance, is the crop <strong>of</strong> choice<br />
for dry regions and areas with unreliable rainfall. Sorghum is the third most widely grown<br />
crop in India after rice and wheat. However, it is the most important crop <strong>of</strong> the semi-arid<br />
tropics (SAT) in India and constitutes the staple food for a large proportion <strong>of</strong> the population.<br />
The sorghum is grown throughout India under rainfed conditions on an area <strong>of</strong> 3.84 million<br />
ha with annual production <strong>of</strong> 3.76 million tonnes and average productivity 979 kg/ha.<br />
Cultivation <strong>of</strong> sorghum on conserved moisture in Ghed area <strong>of</strong> Gujarat is a common practice.<br />
Sorghum is a highly nutrient exhaustive crop, therefore, to achieve sustainable higher<br />
productivity, maintenance <strong>of</strong> native soil fertility and health is necessary. Keeping in view,<br />
this experiment was planned to study the effect <strong>of</strong> nitrogen and phosphorus fertilization on<br />
yield <strong>of</strong> sorghum under conserved soil moisture in Ghed area <strong>of</strong> Gujarat.<br />
Methodolody<br />
A field experiment was conducted during the Semi-rabi season <strong>of</strong> 2016 to 2019 at Dry<br />
Farming Research Station, Junagadh Agricultural University, Ratia (Porbandar). The soil was<br />
medium in available nitrogen (258 kg/ha), medium in available phosphorus (45.27 kg/ha) and<br />
high in available potassium (710.0 kg/ha). The experiment was laid out in a factorial<br />
randomized block design taking 12 treatments combinations <strong>of</strong> 4 levels <strong>of</strong> nitrogen (0, 20, 40<br />
and 60 kg/ha) and 3 levels <strong>of</strong> phosphorus (0, 20 and 40 kg/ha) with 3 replications. The<br />
nitrogen was applied in two splits viz., 50 % as basal through ammonium sulphate and 50 %<br />
as top dressing at 45-50 DAS through urea by drilling in soil up to 10 cm depth, while<br />
phosphorus was applied as basal through single super phosphate as per treatments. The Gross<br />
and net plot size was 5.0 m X 2.7 m and 4.0 m X 1.8 m, respectively. Sorghum Gundari<br />
(Local) was sown at distance <strong>of</strong> 45 cm x 10 cm on 25 October 2016, 7 October 2017, 20<br />
September 2018 and 9 November 2019 under conserved soil moisture. The total rainfall<br />
received during the crop season (June to November) was 306, 270, 149 and 545 mm in 12,<br />
14, 8 and 18 rainy days in the year <strong>of</strong> 2016, 2017, 2018 and 2019, respectively. Data on<br />
growth, yield performance and economic <strong>of</strong> sorghum was pooled over 4 years.<br />
Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture<br />
568 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Results<br />
On the basis <strong>of</strong> four years pooled mean, plant height, grain and fodder yield was significantly<br />
affected by different levels <strong>of</strong> nitrogen as shown in table. Significantly highest plant height<br />
and fodder yield were recorded with application <strong>of</strong> 60 kg N/ha as compared to control, 20<br />
and 40 kg N/ha, while grain yield was recorded significantly highest with application <strong>of</strong> 60<br />
kg N/ha as compared to control and 20 kg N/ha, but it remained at par with 40kg N/ha.<br />
Among phosphorus levels, grain and fodder yield <strong>of</strong> sorghum was significantly influenced<br />
due to different levels <strong>of</strong> phosphorus and recorded significantly highest grain and fodder<br />
yield under application <strong>of</strong> 40 kg P2O5/ha as compared to control, but it remained at par with<br />
application <strong>of</strong> 20 kg P 2O 5/ha. Similarly maximum net returns <strong>of</strong> Rs. 25389/ha and B: C ratio<br />
<strong>of</strong> 1.93 were recorded under application <strong>of</strong> 60 kg N/ha followed by Rs. 23363/ha and B: C<br />
ratio <strong>of</strong> 1.87 under application <strong>of</strong> 40 kg N/ha. Whereas with the application <strong>of</strong> phosphorus,<br />
maximum net returns <strong>of</strong> Rs. 21563/ha and B: C ratio <strong>of</strong> 1.81 were recorded with application<br />
<strong>of</strong> 20 kg P2O5/ha.<br />
Growth, yield and economics <strong>of</strong> sorghum as influenced by nitrogen and phosphorus<br />
Treatments<br />
Nitrogen (kg/ha)<br />
Phosphorus (kg/ha)<br />
Conclusion<br />
levels under conserved soil moisture (Pooled mean <strong>of</strong> 4 years)<br />
On the basis <strong>of</strong> four years pooled results, it can conclude that higher grain and fodder yield<br />
and net returns from sorghum (Gundri Local) can be secured by application <strong>of</strong> 40 kg N and<br />
20 kg P 2O 5/ha in medium black clayey soil under conserved soil moisture in Ghed area <strong>of</strong><br />
Gujarat.<br />
Plant<br />
height<br />
(cm)<br />
Grain<br />
yield<br />
(kg/ha)<br />
Fodder<br />
yield<br />
(kg/ha)<br />
Net<br />
return<br />
( /ha)<br />
B:C<br />
ratio<br />
Control 77.3 774 1746 14344 1.56<br />
20 83.2 889 2002 19623 1.74<br />
40 89.6 972 2190 23363 1.87<br />
60 96.8 1020 2298 25389 1.93<br />
SEm+ 1.1 18 37<br />
CD (P=0.05) 3.2 50 104<br />
Control 86.0 872 1968 18995 1.73<br />
20 86.2 932 2099 21563 1.81<br />
40 88.1 937 2110 21468 1.80<br />
SEm+ 1.0 15 34<br />
CD (P=0.05) NS 50 104<br />
569 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
References<br />
Avilkumar, K., Satish, C., Praveen Rao, V., Uma Devi, M. and Ramulu, V. 2016. Drip<br />
irrigation levels influence on yield attributes, yield and water productivity <strong>of</strong> rabi<br />
sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench). In: <strong>Extended</strong> Summaries, Fourth<br />
International Agronomy Congress on Agronomy for Sustainable Management <strong>of</strong><br />
Natural Resources, Environment, Energy and Livelihood Security to Achieve Zero<br />
Hunger Challenge, 22–26 November 2016, Indian Society <strong>of</strong> Agronomy, Indian<br />
Council <strong>of</strong> Agricultural Research, New Delhi, India Vol.3: 118-120<br />
T4a-03aO -1512<br />
In-situ Rainwater Harvesting Techniques and Diversification <strong>of</strong> Cropping<br />
System for Climate Resilient Agriculture in Bundelkhand region<br />
Yogeshwar Singh, Rajiv Nandan and Sandeep Upadhyay<br />
College <strong>of</strong> Agriculture, Rani Lakshmi Bai Central Agriculture University, Jhansi,<br />
Uttar Pradesh. 284003, India<br />
Conspicuous to frequent climatic and hydrological droughts, the Bundelkhand region<br />
experiences severe agricultural droughts. Soils <strong>of</strong> these regions are shallow, gravelly and<br />
extremely porous with low organic matter and have poor water holding capacity. Much <strong>of</strong> the<br />
region suffers from acute ecological degradation due to top soil erosion and deforestation,<br />
leading to low productivity <strong>of</strong> the land. Thus, realizing the importance <strong>of</strong> rain water<br />
harvesting and diversified climate resilient cropping system in Bundelkhand regions, research<br />
entitled “In-situ rainwater management and crop diversification for climate resilient<br />
agriculture” was conducted. Attempts were made to generate information about the<br />
subsequent availability <strong>of</strong> in-situ rain water for the crop during the extended dry spell<br />
periods.<br />
Methodology<br />
Field experiment has been initiated during the year 2020-21 and 2021-22 at RLBCAU, Jhansi<br />
to standardize the Agro-techniques for efficient use <strong>of</strong> irrigation and rain water and crop<br />
diversification for climate resilient agriculture in Bundelkhand. The experiment was<br />
conducted in split plot design with five In-situ rainwater harvesting methods namely control<br />
(conventional practice); deep tillage; horizontal mulching; broad bed and furrow and ridge<br />
and furrow in main plot and three cropping systems namely groundnut – wheat; maize –<br />
mustard and sorghum – chickpea in sub-plot, replicated thrice. The experimental crops were<br />
managed as per standard package and practices.<br />
Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture<br />
570 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Results<br />
The system productivity in terms <strong>of</strong> wheat equivalent yield was maximum in ridge and<br />
furrow planting system (8644 kg/ha/yr) with the highest water productivity (2.78 kg grain/m 3<br />
water). Such an alteration in yield performance order could have been due to ease dissolution<br />
and accessibility <strong>of</strong> the N, influenced by the appreciable soil moisture at the beginning <strong>of</strong> the<br />
season. Among different cropping systems (groundnut-wheat, maize-mustard and sorghumchickpea),<br />
maize-mustard cropping sequence showed superiority for the highest water<br />
productivity (2.37) and net returns (Rs. 87,799 per ha), while groundnut-wheat exhibited<br />
maximum MEY (9119 kg/ha/yr).<br />
Effect <strong>of</strong> tillage practices on system and water productivity<br />
Kharif<br />
(Maize<br />
Equivalent<br />
Yield -t/ha)<br />
Rabi<br />
(Maize<br />
Equivalent<br />
Yield -t/ha)<br />
System<br />
productivity<br />
(MEYt/ha/yr)<br />
Water<br />
applied<br />
(m 3 /ha)<br />
%<br />
Water<br />
saving<br />
Water<br />
productivity<br />
(Kg<br />
grain/m 3<br />
water)<br />
Net<br />
returns<br />
(Rs/ha)<br />
A) In-situ rainwater harvesting methods (Main-plot)-05<br />
Deep tillage 3.77 4.37 8.12 3980 7.2 2.04 79571<br />
Residue<br />
mulching<br />
Broad bed &<br />
furrow<br />
Ridge and<br />
furrow<br />
Conventional<br />
Practice<br />
4.00 4.47 8.48 3820 11.0 2.22 84658<br />
3.87 4.43 8.30 3750 12.6 2.21 81524<br />
4.07 4.56 8.64 3110 27.5 2.78 86903<br />
3.55 4.38 7.94 4290 - 1.85 79400<br />
CD (P=0.05) 0.329 0.367 0.673 297 - 0.21 4158<br />
B) Cropping system (Sub-plot)-03<br />
Groundnut-<br />
Wheat<br />
Sorghum–<br />
Chick Pea<br />
Maize-<br />
Mustard<br />
4.401 4.718<br />
3.472 3.741<br />
3.684 4.886<br />
9.12 4600 - 1.98 79994<br />
7.21 3150 31.5 2.29 78240<br />
8.57 3620 21.3 2.37 87799<br />
CD (P=0.05) - - 0.910 314 0.27 3974<br />
Effect <strong>of</strong> cropping system on soil fertility at harvest<br />
Cropping system OC (%) pH EC (dS/m) N (kg/ha) P (kg/ha) K (kg/ha)<br />
Groundnut-wheat 0.31 7.4 0.14 138.9 10.3 244.8<br />
Sorghum–Chick Pea 0.30 7.6 0.16 135.1 9.6 237.4<br />
571 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Maize-Mustard 0.28 7.6 0.16 128.4 8.9 230.6<br />
CD (P=0.05) NS NS NS 5.71 0.9 11.7<br />
Initial 0.28 7.7 0.16 134.2 8.1 241.2<br />
It was observed that in-situ rain water harvesting was found maximum in ridge and furrow<br />
system and has been found promising in better moisture retention and results in 27% water<br />
saving. The system productivity was registered maximum in Ridge and Furrow planting<br />
system besides generating highest water productivity. Amongst different cropping systems,<br />
Maize-mustard cropping sequence has proved its superiority in terms <strong>of</strong> generating highest<br />
Maize equivalent yield, water productivity and net return although Groundnut-wheat has<br />
recorded maximum WEY and Gross Return. It has also been observed that Maize-mustard<br />
cropping sequence which has observed highest Maize equivalent yield, water productivity<br />
and net return has resulted in decline in soil fertility.<br />
Conclusion<br />
The study recommends practicing ridge and furrow planting especially in Maize and<br />
Sorghum crops to promote better drainage and in-situ rain water harvesting in furrows to<br />
address intermittent drought.<br />
References<br />
Athuman Mahinda, Shinya Funakawa, Hitoshi Shinjo & Method Kilasara. 2018. Interactive<br />
effects <strong>of</strong> in situ rainwater harvesting techniques and fertilizer sources on mitigation <strong>of</strong><br />
soil moisture stress for sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench) in dryland areas <strong>of</strong><br />
Tanzania. Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 64(6) 710–718.<br />
T4a-04O-1151<br />
Gliricidia Green Leaf Manure as a Source <strong>of</strong> Potassium for Improvement<br />
in Soil Quality and Sustaining Rainfed Cotton Productivity in Vertisols <strong>of</strong><br />
Central India<br />
V. V. Gabhane, P. R. Ramteke, R. S. Patode, M. M. Ganvir, A. B. Chorey and<br />
A. R. Tupe<br />
AICRP for Dryland Agriculture, Dr Panjabrao Deshmukh Krishi Vidyapeeth,<br />
Akola-444 104, Maharashtra, India.<br />
Cotton based cropping system is one <strong>of</strong> the most preferred cropping patterns in Vidarbha<br />
region by the farming community to reduce the risk in agriculture. However, due to<br />
imbalanced fertilization and very less use <strong>of</strong> the organic manure, there is a continuous mining<br />
leeching <strong>of</strong> the nutrients especially soil K reserve, which results in deterioration <strong>of</strong> soil<br />
Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture<br />
572 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
health. Most <strong>of</strong> the research work on gliricidia as a green leaf manure is focused on nitrogen<br />
contribution through gliricidia. However, limited studies have been carried out on<br />
contribution <strong>of</strong> potassium through gliricidia. The integrated long-term effect <strong>of</strong> gliricidia<br />
green leaf manuring as a source <strong>of</strong> potassium helps in sustaining crop productivity and soil<br />
health. The resultant outcome <strong>of</strong> the study will help to optimize the crop yields as well as<br />
balanced fertilization, which may help to reduce the cost on fertilizers and make cotton<br />
cultivation sustainable.<br />
Methodology<br />
An experiment with the combinations <strong>of</strong> organic and inorganic nutrient sources was<br />
conducted during 2015-16 to 2020-21 at the research field <strong>of</strong> AICRP for Dryland Agriculture,<br />
Dr. PDKV, Akola, Maharashtra on rainfed cotton in Vertisols. The soil <strong>of</strong> the experimental<br />
site was moderately alkaline in reaction, low in available nitrogen (185.80 kg ha -1 ), medium<br />
in available phosphorus (14.60 kg ha -1 ) and high in available potassium (322.0 kg ha -1 ). Soil<br />
samples were collected at harvest <strong>of</strong> crop and were analyzed as per standard methods.<br />
Results<br />
The pooled results (2015-16 to 2020-21) indicated that the highest seed cotton yield (1282.73<br />
kg ha -1 ) was recorded with the application <strong>of</strong> 100% NP + 10 kg K(inorganic)+20 kg K<br />
through gliricidia (T 4). Similar results were recorded by Satpute et al. (2019). The data<br />
presented in the table indicate that the higher Sustainability yield index (0.36) was recorded<br />
with the application <strong>of</strong> 100% NP + 10kg K(inorganic)+20kg K through gliricidia(T4),<br />
indicating the significant role <strong>of</strong> conjunctive use <strong>of</strong> gliricidia green leaf manure along with<br />
chemical fertilizers in sustaining the cotton productivity.<br />
Effect <strong>of</strong> potash application through gliricidia green leaf manuring on yield, SYI and<br />
economics <strong>of</strong> cotton<br />
Treatment<br />
Seed cotton<br />
yield<br />
(kg ha -1 )<br />
SYI<br />
GMR<br />
(Rs ha -1 )<br />
NMR<br />
(Rs ha -1 )<br />
B:C<br />
Ratio<br />
Control 692.39 0.22 35284 14575 1.70<br />
100% RDF (60:30:30 NPK kg ha -1 ) 1052.47 0.31 53548 26051 1.93<br />
100% NP + 15kg K(inorganic)+ 15kg K through<br />
gliricidia<br />
100% NP + 10kg K(inorganic)+ 20 kg K through<br />
gliricidia<br />
1207.86 0.34 61114 32008 2.08<br />
1282.73 0.36 64948 35265 2.16<br />
100% NP + 30kg K through gliricidia 1117.07 0.32 56692 27453 1.92<br />
75% N +100% P+15kg K(inorganic) + 15kg K<br />
through gliricidia<br />
1036.97 0.29 52223 24093 1.84<br />
75% N +100% P+30kg K through gliricidia 977.68 0.30 49542 21105 1.73<br />
573 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
50% N +100% P+30kg K through gliricidia 902.00 0.27 45700 18550 1.67<br />
100% K through gliricidia 809.37 0.25 41388 17739 1.73<br />
SE (m) ± 30.96 - 1517 1517 -<br />
CD at 5% 87.31 - 4278 4278 -<br />
The pooled data on yield and economics <strong>of</strong> cotton presented in Table indicate that the higher<br />
gross monetary returns, net monetary returns and B:C ratio was obtained with the application<br />
<strong>of</strong> 100% NP + 10 kg K(inorganic)+20 kg K through gliricidia (T 4) indicating the significant<br />
role <strong>of</strong> integrated nutrient management through gliricidia green leaf manuring in enhancing<br />
the economics <strong>of</strong> cotton cultivation. The higher soil organic carbon (0.68%) was recorded<br />
with application <strong>of</strong> 100% NP + 10kg K(inorganic)+20kg K through gliricidia (T 4). The data<br />
on available nutrient status <strong>of</strong> the experimental soil, indicated that significantly higher<br />
available nitrogen (211.2kg ha -1 ), available phosphorus (16.75kg ha -1 ) and available<br />
potassium (361.6kg ha -1 ) was observed with application <strong>of</strong> 100% NP + 10 kg<br />
K(inorganic)+20 kg K through gliricidia(T 4). The increase in available phosphorus status<br />
under INM treatments is due to use <strong>of</strong> gliricidia green leaf manure, being direct source <strong>of</strong><br />
phosphorus and it might have also solubilized the native phosphorus in the soil through<br />
release <strong>of</strong> various organic acids which had chelating effect, that reduced phosphorus fixation,<br />
whereas the increase in available K may be due to the fact that, gliricidia green leaf manure<br />
addition could increase the CEC <strong>of</strong> soil, which is responsible for holding more amount <strong>of</strong><br />
exchangeable K and helped in the release <strong>of</strong> exchangeable K from non-exchangeable pool<br />
just as in case <strong>of</strong> the study <strong>of</strong> Kumar et al., 2008.<br />
Effect potash management through gliricidia green leaf manuring on soil fertility and SQI<br />
Treatments<br />
OC<br />
(%)<br />
Avail. Nutrients<br />
(kg ha -1 )<br />
N P K<br />
Control 0.50 181.9 12.75 317.8 2.66<br />
100% RDF (60:30:30 NPK kg ha -1 ) 0.59 198.6 15.05 334.9 2.95<br />
100% NP + 15kg K(inorganic)+15kg K through gliricidia 0.65 209.1 16.51 352.2 3.41<br />
100% NP + 10kg K(inorganic)+20kg K through gliricidia 0.68 211.2 16.75 361.6 3.52<br />
100% NP + 30kg K through gliricidia 0.64 204.9 15.54 353.4 3.37<br />
75% N +100% P+15kg K(inorganic)+15kg K through gliricidia 0.60 196.5 15.18 338.9 3.18<br />
75% N +100% P+30kg K through gliricidia 0.59 198.6 15.12 332.1 3.15<br />
50% N +100% P+30kg K through gliricidia 0.58 192.3 14.81 326.9 3.01<br />
100% K through gliricidia 0.56 190.2 14.08 324.4 2.95<br />
SE (m) ± 0.01 4.02 0.21 6.75 -<br />
CD at 5% 0.04 12.05 0.64 20.2 -<br />
Initial value (2015-16) 0.51 185.8 14.6 322.0 -<br />
SQI<br />
Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture<br />
574 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
The data in respect <strong>of</strong> various potassium fractions in soil indicate that the significantly higher<br />
values <strong>of</strong> water-soluble K, exchangeable K, non-exchangeable K, total K and lattice K was<br />
recorded with the application <strong>of</strong> 100% NP + 10kg K(inorganic)+20kg K through gliricidia<br />
(T4).<br />
Soil quality<br />
The data presented in Table indicate that the higher soil quality index (3.52) was recorded<br />
with the application <strong>of</strong> 100% NP + 10kg K(inorganic)+20kg K through gliricidia(T4).<br />
Conclusion<br />
For sustaining soil fertility, cotton productivity and obtaining higher monetary returns,<br />
application <strong>of</strong> 50% recommended N (30 kg) + 30 kg P2O5 + 10 kg K2O ha -1 through<br />
inorganics and 20 kg K 2O ha -1 through gliricidia green leaf manuring (4 t ha -1 ) at 30 DAS is<br />
recommended as an Integrated Plant Nutrient Supply System under dryland condition.<br />
References<br />
Kumar Balwindar, Gupta, R. K., and Bhandari, A. L. 2008. Soil fertility changes after longterm<br />
application <strong>of</strong> organic manures and crop residues under rice-wheat system. J.<br />
Indian Soc. Soil Sci. 56(1): 80-85.<br />
Satpute Usha, V., Gabhane, V. V., Jawale, S. A., and Nagdeve, M. B. 2019.Effect <strong>of</strong> potash<br />
management through conjoint use <strong>of</strong> Gliricidia green leaf manure and mineral fertilizer<br />
on yield and nutrient uptake by rainfed cotton in Vertisols. Int. J. Chem. Stud. 7(3):<br />
4564-4567.<br />
T4a-05R-1244<br />
Conjunctive use <strong>of</strong> Zeolite and Urea to Minimize Nitrogen Loss and<br />
Enhance Nutrient Availability and Maize Productivity in Alfisols<br />
V. Girijaveni 1 , K. Sammi Reddy 1 , J. V. N. S. Prasad 1 , Ch. Srinivasarao 2 , Sumanta<br />
Kundu 1 , Pushpanajali 1 and K. Srinivas 1<br />
1 Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, Hyderabad 500 059, India<br />
2 National Academy <strong>of</strong> Agricultural Research Management, Hyderabad – 500030, India<br />
Natural zeolites consist <strong>of</strong> three-dimensional framework <strong>of</strong> silica and aluminum tetrahedra<br />
and are hydrated aluminosilicates with honeycomb structure, which is generally very open,<br />
containing channels and cavities. These channels and cavities are filled with cations and<br />
water molecules (Karapinar, 2009). Zeolite is a group <strong>of</strong> natural minerals with physical and<br />
physicochemical properties that can be utilized in various areas such as construction and<br />
agriculture. Research revealed that these naturally occurring zeolites are capable <strong>of</strong> absorbing<br />
575 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
part <strong>of</strong> the excess nutrients and also water, resulting in more balanced macronutrient cation<br />
ratios in the root environment and thus able to enhance water and nutrient use efficiency.<br />
Zeolite possess unique characteristics <strong>of</strong> high cation exchange capacity, large internal<br />
porosity, uniform particle size distribution, and reduces the effect <strong>of</strong> stress on the crop<br />
(Hazrati et al., 2017). Its application improved soil nutrients and soil water content in various<br />
soil types and various crops, i.e. rice, Aloe vera, amaranth, sunflower and dragonhead<br />
(Hazrati et al., 2017; Karimzadeh Asl and Hatami, 2019; Karami et al., 2019). Thus, zeolite<br />
application leads to soil improvement. However, very little literature is available regarding<br />
zeolite performance in divergent crop and soil types in India. Thus, this study was taken up to<br />
study the impact <strong>of</strong> zeolite application on soil nutrient, water and crop performance in rainfed<br />
Alfisols.<br />
Methodology<br />
Pot experiment was carried at CRIDA, Hyderabad with maize as test crop with different<br />
levels <strong>of</strong> zeolite (0, 50,100 & 200 kg ha -1 ) in combination with different fertilizer dose<br />
(control, 50% RDF & 100% RDF) at two different moisture levels (50% and 100% Field<br />
capacity). The experimental design was completely randomized block design with three<br />
replications. The soil used in the study was collected from Hayathnagar Research Farm<br />
(HRF), CRIDA, Hyderabad. The maize hybrid studied was DHM-117. The soils collected<br />
were sieved through 2 mm sieve and was mixed with zeolite and fertilizers as per the<br />
treatments and after mixing <strong>of</strong> zeolite, the pot is filled with soil @ 10 kg pot -1 . At the end <strong>of</strong><br />
the maturity stage, cob from each plant from pot was harvested. Grains were separated from<br />
the cobs and grain yield was calculated. The post-harvest soil samples were also collected<br />
and analyzed for SOC, and available macro (N, P, K) and micro nutrients (Zn, Fe, Mn and<br />
Cu) as per standard procedure. Also, details <strong>of</strong> water added to the crop was collected to<br />
calculate the water use efficiency (WUE).<br />
Results<br />
The two most important factors that affects the maize production is nitrogen and moisture<br />
content. The grain yield <strong>of</strong> maize ranged from 17.99 to 52.15 g pot -1 . The grain yield <strong>of</strong><br />
maize was significantly improved by application <strong>of</strong> different combinations <strong>of</strong> recommended<br />
dose <strong>of</strong> fertilizers and zeolite levels. The lowest grain yield was observed in control (17.99 g<br />
pot -1 ). Increasing the zeolite dose have significantly improved N uptake from 169.39 mg pot -1<br />
to 261.43 mg pot -1 and nitrogen levels also significantly improved N uptake. Similarly,<br />
zeolite application has significantly improved K uptake from 198.75 mg pot -1 to 299.14 mg<br />
pot -1 . Also, zeolite addition improved soil available N by 20.3% and 27% at 50% and 100%<br />
Field capacity respectively and soil available K by 27% and 34.4% under 50% and 100%<br />
Field capacity, respectively.<br />
Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture<br />
576 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Conclusion<br />
The results from this preliminary research showed that zeolite application along with<br />
fertilizers improved crop production and soil chemical properties. There was significant<br />
difference in N and K uptake with higher dose <strong>of</strong> zeolite application (100 & 200 kg ha -1 ) as<br />
compared to control at both the moisture levels. However, further investigations need to be<br />
carried to study the effect <strong>of</strong> zeolite application in different soil types at field conditions.<br />
References<br />
Hazrati, S., Tahmasebi-Sarvestani, Z., Mokhtassi-Bidgoli, A., Modarres-Sanavy, S. A. M.,<br />
Mohammadi, H. and Nicola, S. 2017. Effects <strong>of</strong> zeolite and water stress on growth,<br />
yield and chemical compositions <strong>of</strong> Aloe vera L. Agric. Water Manag. 181:66-72.<br />
Karimzadeh Asl, K. and Hatami, M. 2019. Application <strong>of</strong> zeolite and bacterial fertilizers<br />
modulates physiological performance and essential oil production in dragonhead under<br />
different irrigation regimes. Acta Physiol. Plant. 41(1):1-20.<br />
Karami, S., Hadi, H., Tajbaksh, M. and Modarres-Sanavy, S. A. M. 2020. Effect <strong>of</strong> zeolite on<br />
nitrogen use efficiency and physiological and biomass traits <strong>of</strong> amaranth (Amaranthus<br />
hypochondriacus) under water-deficit stress conditions. J. Soil Sci. 20(3):1427-1441.<br />
T4a-06R-1227<br />
Effect <strong>of</strong> Conservation Agriculture and balanced nutrition on System<br />
Productivity, Pr<strong>of</strong>itability and Mitigating GHGs Emission in Maize-<br />
Horsegram Sequence in Rainfed Alfisols<br />
Sumanta Kundu 1* , Ch. Srinivasarao 1 , R. B. Mallick 2 , K. Sammi Reddy 1 , V. K. Singh 1 , J.<br />
V. N. S. Prasad 1 , A. K. Indoria 1 , G. Pratibha 1 , V. Girija Veni 1 , Pravin B. Thakur 1 , T.<br />
Satyanarayana 3 , Kaushik Majumdar 3 and B. Venkateshwarlu 1<br />
1 ICAR-Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, Santoshnagar, Hyderabad, 500 059, India<br />
2 Institute <strong>of</strong> Agricultural Sciences, Calcutta University, West Bengal, India<br />
3 International Plant Nutrition Institute, Gurgaon, India<br />
* Sumanta.K@icar.gov.in<br />
Land degradation, low soil fertility, erratic rainfall are the prime constraints for low<br />
agricultural production in the semi-arid region. In Alfisols regions <strong>of</strong> southern India, most <strong>of</strong><br />
the cultivated areas produce a single crop in rainy (Kharif) season and 25-30% rainfall goes<br />
unutilized in post rainy (Rabi) season which remains fallow. In these areas, drought hardy<br />
crop like horsegram can be cultivated in sequence <strong>of</strong> Kharif crop by practicing effective soil<br />
moisture conservation measures or conservation agriculture (CA). CA can play a major role<br />
in stabilizing production in rainfed regions by mitigating water and nutrient stress through<br />
577 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
adoption <strong>of</strong> reduced tillage, crop rotations and residue retention. Several successful case<br />
studies on CA were reported in irrigated systems (Aulakh et al., 2012), but very limited<br />
efforts were made in rainfed production systems. In this background, an attempt was made to<br />
find out the impact <strong>of</strong> CA on system productivity, pr<strong>of</strong>itability, nutrient use efficiency and<br />
GHGs emission in maize-horsegram cropping sequence in rainfed Alfisol.<br />
Methodology<br />
A field experiment was conducted during 2010-2020 at Gunegal Research Farm <strong>of</strong> Central<br />
Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture (CRIDA), Hyderabad. These sandy loam soils are<br />
slightly acidic in reaction, low in soil organic carbon, medium available nutrients (N, P and<br />
K). Among micronutrient Zn was deficient (0.48 mg kg -1 ). Experiment was laid out in split<br />
plot design consisting 2 tillage treatments (conservation= zero tillage and residue retention<br />
(CA) and conventional= 2 ploughing, complete removal <strong>of</strong> residues (CT)) as main plot and<br />
nutrient management (control, NPKSZnB (120-60-40-55-10-0.5 kg N, P 2O 5, K 2O, S, Zn, B<br />
respectively), N, P, K, S, Zn, B omission) as sub plot. Each treatment was replicated thrice.<br />
Chemical fertilizers as N, P, K, S, Zn and B were applied in the form <strong>of</strong> urea (46% N),<br />
diammonium phosphate (DAP) (18% N and 46% P 2O 5), muriate <strong>of</strong> potash (MOP) (60%<br />
K2O), single super phosphate (SSP), Zinc sulfate (21% Zn) and Borax respectively. Hybrid<br />
maize (DHM 117) was grown in rainy season (June-October) following 60x25 cm spacing<br />
and horsegram (CRIDA 18R) was sown just after the harvesting <strong>of</strong> maize.<br />
Results<br />
Pooled data showed that system productivity increased through CA in maize-horsegram<br />
sequence through successful raising <strong>of</strong> Rabi season horsegram crop utilizing <strong>of</strong>f season<br />
rainfall through better soil moisture conservation. Out <strong>of</strong> 11 years (2010-2020), 8 years total<br />
system yield in CA was higher than or at par with CT and in 7 years horsegram crop was<br />
successful. Agronomic efficiency (AE) <strong>of</strong> N, P, K in CA was 22.1, 55.3 and 26.6 kg yield<br />
increase per kg <strong>of</strong> fertilizer nutrients applied compared to 18.8, 40.7, 24.1 kg yield increase<br />
per kg <strong>of</strong> fertilizer nutrients applied respectively in CT due better soil water nutrient<br />
interaction (Aulakh et al.,2012). Higher grain yield <strong>of</strong> horsegram in CA was due to 4.2%<br />
higher soil moisture compared to CT during flowering and grain filling stage <strong>of</strong> horsegram<br />
which helped better grain filling <strong>of</strong> horsegram (Kundu et al., 2013). Significantly higher<br />
gross return (Rs. 37308 ha -1 ), net return (Rs. 20951 ha -1 ) and B:C ratio (2.25) was found in<br />
CA compared to CT. Significantly higher available N (207 kg ha -1 ) and K (180 kg ha -1 ) was<br />
observed in balanced fertilization and N omission treatment respectively. Significantly higher<br />
buildup <strong>of</strong> available K (32 kg ha -1 ) and soil organic carbon sequestration (13.6 Mg ha -1 ) was<br />
observed in CA. Higher SOC was observed in CA (0.64%) compared to CT (0.48%). SOC<br />
decreased with depth irrespective <strong>of</strong> tillage systems. There was no significant difference in<br />
SOC beyond 30 cm soil depth. Higher very labile C was observed in CT (0.38%) compared<br />
Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture<br />
578 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
to CA, but higher labile and less labile C was observed in CA compared to CT. Significantly<br />
higher MBC (104 and 91 µg g -1 <strong>of</strong> soil after harvest <strong>of</strong> maize and horsegram respectively),<br />
urease (100 µg NH4 g -1 hr -1 after harvest <strong>of</strong> horsegram), aryl sulfatase, alkaline phosphatase<br />
activity was observed in CA compared to CT. Water soluble K was higher in CA (6.2 mg/kg)<br />
compared to CT in 0-15 and 15-30 cm soil depth. Higher Fe (16.9 mg/kg) and Cu (1.08<br />
mg/kg) was observed in CA compared to CT but Mn content was at par. Significantly higher<br />
CO 2 emission (kg ha -1 ) was observed in CA (5069) as compared to CT (4060) during maize<br />
growing season. Among nutrient management, higher CO 2 emission (kg ha -1 ) was observed<br />
in NPKSZnB (7510) followed by N omission (3258) and control (2927). Significantly higher<br />
N 2O omission (g ha -1 ) was observed in CT (243.7) compared to CA (188.9). CA increased<br />
CO2 emission by 24.8%, but decreased N2O emission by 29% compared to CT which<br />
ultimately resulted lower global warming potential (GWP).<br />
Total system yield (Mg/ha)<br />
12.0<br />
10.0<br />
8.0<br />
6.0<br />
4.0<br />
2.0<br />
0.0<br />
Conclusion<br />
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020<br />
System productivity (Mg ha -1 ) as inflenced by CA.<br />
CA<br />
CT<br />
System productivity increased through CA in maize-horsegram sequence. Effect <strong>of</strong> CA is<br />
more pronounced in sequence crop (horsegram) grown in rabi season. In less rainfall year, it<br />
can minimize the effect <strong>of</strong> moisture stress <strong>of</strong> hosegram and sustain the crop for several more<br />
weeks. CA improved the SOC and available nutrient status, particularly K in the soil. Thus,<br />
CA with improved nutrient management can improve soil health, nutrient use efficiency and<br />
increase net primary productivity and pr<strong>of</strong>itability in rainfed region.<br />
References<br />
Aulakh, M. S., Manchanda, J. S., Garg, A. K., Kumar, S., Dercon, G., Nguyen, M. L., 2012. Crop<br />
production and nutrient use efficiency <strong>of</strong> conservation agriculture for soybean–wheat rotation<br />
in the Indo-Gangetic Plains <strong>of</strong> Northwestern India. Soil Tillage Res. 120: 50–60.<br />
Kundu, S., Srinivasarao, Ch., Mallick, R. B., Satyanarayana, T., Prakash Naik, R., Johnston, A. and<br />
Venkateswarlu, B. 2013. Conservation agriculture in maize (Zea mays L.)-horsegram<br />
(Macrotyloma uniflorum L.) system in rainfed Alfisols for carbon sequestration and climate<br />
change mitigation. J. Agric. Meteorol. 15:144-149.<br />
579 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
T4a-07R-1015<br />
Effect <strong>of</strong> Conservation Agriculture and Mineral Nitrogen Levels on Soil<br />
Aggregate Stability Indices and Associated Carbon in Rainfed Maize (Zea<br />
mays L.) - Pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.) Crop Rotation under<br />
Alfisols<br />
A. K. Indoria 1* , K. Sammi Reddy 1 , G. Pratibha 1 , V. K. Singh 1 , D. S. Kumar 2 , S. Kundu 1 ,<br />
S. S. Balloli 1 , K. Srinivas 1 , K. L. Sharma 1 , M. Prabhakar 1 , Ch. Srinivasarao 3 , V. Visha<br />
Kumari 1 , S. Sukumaran 1 , V. N. Mishra 2 and H. Sahu 1<br />
1 ICAR-Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, Hyderabad, India<br />
2 Indira Gandhi Krishi Vishwavidyalaya, Raipur, India<br />
3 ICAR- National Academy <strong>of</strong> Agricultural Research Management, Hyderabad, India<br />
* ashok.indoria@icar.gov.in<br />
Intensive tillage directly affects the stability and formation <strong>of</strong> soil aggregates by disrupting<br />
soil structure. Its intensity deteriorates and weakens soil aggregates, making them susceptible<br />
to decay. Conservation agriculture as a soil management technology has been suggested by<br />
many researchers to minimise the negative impact <strong>of</strong> conventional tillage practices on soil<br />
aggregate functioning (Indoria et. al., 2017). Soil aggregates are considered as the pockets to<br />
provide physical protection to soil carbon and significantly affect the diffusion rate <strong>of</strong><br />
oxygen, nutrient adsorption, soil water retention, microbial community and root growth<br />
(Indoria et. al., 2017). This study was aimed to assess the impact <strong>of</strong> conservation agriculture<br />
practices and different levels <strong>of</strong> mineral N on soil aggregate stability indices and associated<br />
carbon in maize-pigeonpea crop rotation under Alfisols.<br />
Methodology<br />
A long-term field experiment was established at Gunegal Research Farm <strong>of</strong> ICAR-CRIDA,<br />
Hyderabad in 2012. Treatments includes three tillage practices viz., CT (conventional<br />
tillage), RT (reduced tillage) and NT (no-tillage), and four nitrogen levels viz., N-0= no<br />
nitrogen application (control). N-75= 75% <strong>of</strong> RDN (recommended dose <strong>of</strong> nitrogen), N-<br />
100=100% <strong>of</strong> RDN and N-125=125% <strong>of</strong> RDN <strong>of</strong> maize and pigeonpea crops on yearly<br />
rotation basis. Soil samples were collected during 2018 (after seven years) from 0-7.5, 7.5-15<br />
and 15-30 cm soil depths. The aggregate size distribution <strong>of</strong> soil was determined by wet<br />
sieving method using Yoder type apparatus. The C associated with different aggregate size<br />
fractions was determined by using the CHNS Analyzer, Vario EL.<br />
Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture<br />
580 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Results<br />
Tillage practices and mineral nitrogen levels significantly influenced the aggregate stability<br />
indices. Significantly higher mean weight diameter (MWD) <strong>of</strong> soil aggregates recorded in the<br />
NT (35%) and RT (25%) as compared to the CT in 0-7.5 cm soil depth. Similarly,<br />
significantly higher MWD were recorded under N-125 as compared to the other N levels (Fig<br />
1 A). A similar trend was observed in 7.5-15 and 15-30 cm soil depth with respect to the<br />
MWD. About 70% higher aggregate ratio (AR) was observed in NT, and about 33% higher<br />
AR was observed under RT as compared to the CT. Similarly, nitrogen treatment follows the<br />
order: N-0< N-750.5-0.25>0.25-0.106>1-0.5>2-1>4.75-2<br />
mm>silt+clay at all the soil depths, irrespective <strong>of</strong> tillage and nitrogen levels. The order <strong>of</strong><br />
aggregate and silt+clay associated C content follows: NT>RT>CT, while in case <strong>of</strong> N levels,<br />
it follows: N-125 >N-100>N-75>N-0. In NT and RT, the C stocks in different macroaggregates<br />
(4.75-2, 2-1, 1-0.5 and 0.5-0.25 mm) increased, while these decreased in microaggregates<br />
(0.25-0.106 and 0.106-0.053 mm).<br />
Effect <strong>of</strong> different tillage practices and mineral nitrogen levels on A) MWD (mm) and water stable<br />
aggregates (%) in 0-7.5 cm soil depth.<br />
581 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
The total residues turn-out had significant (p ≤ 0.05) and positive correlation with MWD,<br />
WSA, WSMacA, AR, WSMacA-C, WSMicA-C, silt+clay-C and WSMacA C stock, and was<br />
significantly (p ≤ 0.05) and negatively correlated with WSMicA, WSMicA Cstock and<br />
silt+clay Cstock at 0-7.5, 7.515 and 15-30 cm soil depth. These results were conformity with<br />
the earlier findings by Zeng et al., 2021.<br />
Conclusion<br />
The present study indicates that full conservation agriculture (NT) or partial conservation<br />
agriculture (RT) coupled with adequate application <strong>of</strong> mineral N help in creating the<br />
optimum environment in soil for overall improvement <strong>of</strong> the aggregate indices and enhancing<br />
the aggregate C stocks.<br />
References<br />
Indoria, A.K., Srinivasarao, Ch., Sharma, K.L., and Sammi Reddy, K. 2017. Conservation<br />
agriculture–a panacea to improve soil physical health. Curr. Sci. 112, 52-61.<br />
Zeng, R. Wei, Y., Huang, J., Chen, X. and Cai, C. 2021. Soil organic carbon stock and<br />
fractional distribution across central south China. Int. Soil Water Conserv. Res. 9,<br />
620-630.<br />
T4a-08R- 1187<br />
Growth and Yield <strong>of</strong> Groundnut as influenced by Moisture Stress at<br />
different Phenophases<br />
C. Radha Kumari, B. Sahadeva Reddy, D. V. Srinivasulu, K. C. Nataraj and<br />
Ch. Murali Krishna<br />
Agricultural Research Station, Acharya N. G. Ranga Agricultural University, Ananthapuram -515 001<br />
Anantapuram has the largest groundnut area among different districts <strong>of</strong> Andhra Pradesh.<br />
It is 2 nd driest district in the country after Jaisalmer in Rajasthan with lowest recorded<br />
rainfall 553 mm. Besides low rainfall, the variability in rainfall distribution is also very<br />
high in the district. Some <strong>of</strong> the previous studies have shown that the pod yield <strong>of</strong><br />
groundnut had a curvilinear relationship with rainfall and soil moisture ( Vittal et al.,<br />
2003). In rainfed agriculture, a need is <strong>of</strong>ten felt to identify suitable drought resistant<br />
varieties <strong>of</strong> crops which have a better performance under varying soil and agro-climatic<br />
conditions. Accordingly, the present study was conducted with the objective <strong>of</strong> assessing<br />
the impact <strong>of</strong> dry spells at different growth stages on groundnut productivity and<br />
identifying a suitable drought resistant variety for attaining maximum productivity in an<br />
arid alfisol.<br />
Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture<br />
582 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Methodology<br />
A field experiment was conducted to study growth and yield <strong>of</strong> groundnut as influenced by<br />
moisture stress imposed at different growth stages <strong>of</strong> groundnut using rainout shelters under<br />
rainfed conditions during Kharif, 2015-16 at Agricultural Research Station, Ananthapuram <strong>of</strong><br />
Andhra Pradesh. This experiment was non replicated laid out in split plot design. The main<br />
plots consisted <strong>of</strong> four treatments viz., M1: Imposing moisture stress during 30-50 DAS<br />
(flowering to pegging), M 2: Imposing moisture stress during 50-70 DAS (pegging to pod<br />
formation), M 3: Imposing moisture stress during 70-90 DAS (pod filling to maturation) and<br />
M4: Moisture stress free condition and sub plots comprised <strong>of</strong> 5 varieties viz., K-6, K-9,<br />
Anantha, Dharani and Harithandhra. Sowing <strong>of</strong> different varieties was taken up as per the<br />
treatments M1, M2 and M3 treatments were imposed by withholding rainfall using rainout<br />
shelters during 30-50 (flowering to pegging), 50-70 (pegging to pod formation), and 70-90<br />
DAS (pod filling to maturation) respectively followed by regular irrigation. In M 4 treatment<br />
moisture stress free condition was maintained by providing irrigation for entire crop growth<br />
period through sprinkler irrigation system. Leaf, stem, root dry weight per plant at 40 and 80<br />
DAS, and pod yield was measured. A two-way ANOVA is used by considering periods<br />
(days) as a related factor, moisture stress levels and varieties as independent factors followed<br />
by DMRT to identify homogeneous subsets among moisture stress levels and varieties with<br />
respect to pod yield.<br />
Results<br />
The results indicated that dry matter partitioning is changing significantly at different stages<br />
<strong>of</strong> crop growth as presented in the table below. Further, an interaction effect <strong>of</strong> different<br />
stages (DAS) and moisture stress levels is also influencing the dry matter partitioning in<br />
stem which significantly varied with four moisture stress levels. Similarly, dry matter<br />
partitioning is significantly different among five varieties at 40 and 80 DAS which supports<br />
an interaction effect <strong>of</strong> moisture stress and at different stages. Further it is also noticed that<br />
dry matter partitioning in stem is significantly different among four moisture stress levels at<br />
5% level in which ‘moisture stress free’ is deviating significantly from other three levels<br />
with the highest partitioning value i.e 2.438 irrespective <strong>of</strong> DAS and varieties (DMRT).<br />
Whereas treatments influence the dry matter partitioning in stem significantly in which<br />
Dharani and K9 varieties are showing high value <strong>of</strong> partitioning than that <strong>of</strong> other three<br />
varieties (DMRT).<br />
Moisture stress during 70-90DAS (pod filling to maturity) recorded highest pod yield<br />
reduction followed by Moisture stress during 50-70DAS (pegging to pod formation) and 30-<br />
50DAS (flowering to pegging) compared to stress free condition. It indicates that pod filling<br />
to maturity stage is most critical stage in groundnut. Among varieties K6, Harithandra and<br />
Ananta recorded pod yield reduction <strong>of</strong> 54%, 53.7% and 49.3% respectively. K9 and<br />
583 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Dharani recorded 39 and 39.7% pod yield reduction. It indicates that K9 and Dharani are<br />
drought resistant varieties. Ramachandrappa et al. (1992) reported that the groundnut crop<br />
was more susceptible to moisture stress from70 days to harvest (pod initiation to maturity).<br />
Golakiya and Patel (1992) reported that water stress at flowering, pegging, pod development<br />
and pod maturation stages reduced the pod yields <strong>of</strong> groundnut by 26.6, 44.7, 56.3 and 60<br />
percent respectively.<br />
Conclusion<br />
The findings <strong>of</strong> the present study indicated that pod filling to maturity stage is most critical<br />
stage in groundnut with highest pod yield reduction. Among the varieties, K9 and Dharani<br />
are more drought resistant than K6, Ananta and Harithandra varieties.<br />
References<br />
Golakiya, B. A., and Patel, M. S., 1992. Growth dynamics and reproductive efficiency <strong>of</strong><br />
groundnut under water stress at different phenophases. Indian J. Agron. 26: 179-186.<br />
Ramachandrappa, B. K., Kulakarni, K. R., and Nanjappa, H. V. 1992. Stress day index for<br />
scheduling irrigation in summer groundnut (Arachis hypogaeaL.). Indian J. Agron. 37:<br />
276-279.<br />
Vittal, K. P. R., Maruthi Sankar, G. R., Singh, H. P., Balaguravaiah, D., Padmalatha, Y. and<br />
Moisture<br />
stress<br />
Moisture<br />
Stress<br />
during<br />
30-50<br />
DAS<br />
Moisture<br />
Stress<br />
during<br />
50-70<br />
Yellamanda Reddy, T. 2003. Modeling sustainablility <strong>of</strong> crop yield on rainfed<br />
groundnut based on rainfall and land degradation. Indian J. Dryland Agric. Res. Dev.<br />
18(1) : 7–13.<br />
Dry matter partitioning (g) per plant and pod yield <strong>of</strong> groundnut as influenced by<br />
moisture stress imposed during different stages<br />
Mean<br />
Variety<br />
Leaf dry<br />
weight per<br />
plant (g)<br />
40<br />
DAS<br />
80<br />
DAS<br />
Stem dry<br />
weight per<br />
plant (g)<br />
40<br />
DAS<br />
80<br />
DAS<br />
Root dry<br />
weight per<br />
plant (g)<br />
40<br />
DAS<br />
80<br />
DAS<br />
Leaf area<br />
index (LAI)<br />
40<br />
DAS<br />
80<br />
DAS<br />
Pod<br />
yield<br />
(kg/ha)<br />
%<br />
Decrease<br />
<strong>of</strong> pod<br />
yield over<br />
control<br />
K6 0.68 3.21 0.72 2.75 0.23 0.56 0.65 1.33 1638 -32.0<br />
K9 0.82 4.31 0.96 3.15 0.18 0.61 0.80 1.69 1733 -17.0<br />
Anantha 0.89 3.98 0.76 2.70 0.15 0.63 0.75 1.54 1614 -28.0<br />
Dharani 0.96 4.33 0.82 3.83 0.10 0.59 0.94 1.77 1842 -16.0<br />
Harithandra 0.71 2.67 0.67 2.51 0.08 0.42 0.68 1.16 1547 -27.0<br />
Mean 0.81 3.70 0.79 2.99 0.15 0.56 0.76 1.50 1674 -24.0<br />
K6 0.76 3.92 0.85 2.84 0.16 0.62 0.76 1.46 1374 -43.0<br />
K9 0.82 4.33 1.16 3.48 0.09 0.84 0.66 1.88 1671 -20.0<br />
Ananta 0.83 4.32 0.95 3.14 0.14 0.56 0.69 1.56 1271 -43.0<br />
Dharani 1.05 3.97 0.81 2.89 0.16 0.78 0.97 1.76 1694 -22.0<br />
Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture<br />
584 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
DAS Harithandra 0.72 3.13 0.95 2.03 0.11 0.58 0.71 1.34 1123 -47.0<br />
Moisture<br />
Stress<br />
during<br />
70-90<br />
DAS<br />
Moisture<br />
stress<br />
free<br />
Total<br />
Mean 0.84 3.93 0.94 2.88 0.13 0.68 0.76 1.60 1426 -35.0<br />
K6 0.96 2.60 0.99 2.47 0.21 0.52 0.71 1.25 314 -87.0<br />
K9 0.59 3.33 0.86 2.88 0.14 0.50 0.50 1.30 412 -80.0<br />
Ananta 0.85 3.95 0.69 2.88 0.14 0.47 0.62 1.45 509 -77.0<br />
Dharani 0.65 3.02 0.88 2.58 0.14 0.62 0.54 1.31 409 -81.0<br />
Harithandra 0.76 2.69 0.67 1.96 0.08 0.76 0.62 1.10 276 -87.0<br />
Mean 0.76 3.12 0.82 2.55 0.14 0.57 0.60 1.28 384 -82.4<br />
K6 0.82 2.84 0.66 2.91 0.08 0.27 0.87 2.35 2409<br />
K9 0.68 5.69 1.13 5.65 0.16 0.89 0.86 2.18 2085<br />
Ananta 0.98 5.29 1.05 4.33 0.23 0.97 0.82 2.31 2237<br />
Dharani 0.64 2.57 0.73 2.25 0.18 0.48 0.79 2.06 2180<br />
Harithandra 0.76 3.24 0.65 3.67 0.13 0.39 0.86 2.08 2110<br />
Mean 0.78 3.93 0.84 3.76 0.16 0.60 0.84 2.20 2204<br />
K6 0.81 3.14 0.81 2.74 0.17 0.49 0.75 1.60 1433 -54.0<br />
K9 0.73 4.42 1.03 3.79 0.14 0.71 0.71 1.76 1475 -39.0<br />
Ananta 0.89 4.39 0.86 3.26 0.17 0.66 0.72 1.72 1407 -49.3<br />
Dharani 0.83 3.47 0.81 2.89 0.15 0.62 0.81 1.73 1531 -39.7<br />
Harithandra 0.74 2.93 0.74 2.54 0.10 0.54 0.72 1.42 1264 -53.7<br />
DAS **DAS vs moisture stress levels**,<br />
DAS vs Varieties*, varieties* and stress levels*<br />
*significant @ 5% level, ** significant at 1% level, NS Not significant, same alphabet<br />
indicates insignificant difference (DMRT)<br />
T4a-09R-1443<br />
Impact <strong>of</strong> Zero Tillage over Conventional Tillage in Kushinagar District<br />
<strong>of</strong> Uttar Pradesh<br />
Ashok Rai 1 , Neeraj Singh 2 , Vinay Kr. Patel 1 , Vishal Singh 1 and Shamsher Singh 1<br />
1<br />
Krishi Vigyan kendra (ICAR-IIVR) Sargatia Seorahi, Kushinagar (U.P.) -274406<br />
2<br />
ICAR-IIVR Varanasi (U.P.)<br />
An experiment conducted at Amawakhas Nyaypanchayat, Kushinagar district <strong>of</strong> U.P. Under<br />
National Innovation in Climate Resilient Agriculture (NICRA) project for the scrutiny <strong>of</strong> the<br />
impact <strong>of</strong> zero tillage over conventional tillage during the year 2012 to 2016. Zero tillage<br />
reduces cost <strong>of</strong> tillage and irrigation, which results in increase <strong>of</strong> yield through possible<br />
improvement in sowing time and enhanced water use efficiencies. The experiment results<br />
revealed that performance <strong>of</strong> zero tillage was found superior over conventional tillage in<br />
context <strong>of</strong> yield attributes viz. spike length, no. <strong>of</strong> spike m -2 , no. <strong>of</strong> grain spike -1 except test<br />
weight. Therefore, the mean yield was estimated higher in zero tillage i,e 40.55 qha -1 which<br />
was 8.22 % higher than conventional tillage i.e 3722 kg ha -1 . On average zero tillage saved<br />
585 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
total cost <strong>of</strong> cultivation <strong>of</strong> Rs 7265.69 ha -1 and increased the pr<strong>of</strong>it by 13171.07 ha -1 . Zero<br />
tillage method also recorded higher bbenefit cost ratio was 2.34 as compared to conventional<br />
tillage method i.e. 1.70.<br />
Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture<br />
T4a-10R-1235<br />
Nutrient Dynamics in Conservation Agriculture under Rainfed Conditions<br />
P. S. Prabhamani, H. B. Babalad, R. K. Patil and Geetha Shirnalli<br />
University <strong>of</strong> Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad, Karnataka, India – 580 005<br />
Wide spread degradation <strong>of</strong> natural resources in rainfed areas and climate change are<br />
threatening the national food security. This has brought about focus on rainfed ecology which<br />
has been now affected has very low level <strong>of</strong> sustainability. In rainfed regions, Conservation<br />
agriculture (CA) has been proposed as a widely adapted set <strong>of</strong> management principles that<br />
can assure more sustainable agricultural production. Agro-ecology specific conservation<br />
agriculture strategies are needed in rainfed production systems that have the scope in saving<br />
time, reduced cost <strong>of</strong> production and increase soil carbon sequestration and nutrient<br />
stratification. Conservation tillage is a widely-used terminology in CA to denote soil<br />
management systems that result in at least 30 per cent <strong>of</strong> the soil surface being covered with<br />
crop residues after seeding <strong>of</strong> the subsequent crop. This helps to improve the soil organic<br />
carbon (SOC), physical, chemical and biological properties. Tillage, residue management and<br />
crop rotation have a significant impact on nutrient distribution and transformation in soil<br />
(Sharma et al., 2021). The experiment was conducted with objective to study the effect <strong>of</strong><br />
conservation tillage practices on soil physical properties and nutrient dynamics in groundnutsorghum<br />
cropping system under rainfed conditions.<br />
Methodology<br />
A field experiment was initiated on a fixed site during 2013-14 at Main Agricultural Research<br />
Station, University <strong>of</strong> Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad and after four years <strong>of</strong> experimentation<br />
the results were discussed in this article. The experiment was laid out in strip block design<br />
with six different tillage practices in three replications [CT1: No tillage with BBF (broad bed<br />
and furrows) and crop residues retained on the surface, CT 2: Reduced tillage with BBF and<br />
partial incorporation <strong>of</strong> crop residues, CT 3: No tillage with flat bed (FB) and crop residues<br />
retained on the surface, CT4: Reduced tillage with FB and partial incorporation <strong>of</strong> crop<br />
residues, CT 5: Conventional tillage with crop residues incorporation and CT 6: Conventional<br />
tillage with no application <strong>of</strong> crop residues as control]. Rotavator was passed for shredding<br />
and partial incorporation <strong>of</strong> residue treatment plots and to shred the residues and retention on<br />
the surface rotaslasher was passed, in conventional tillage with crop residue incorporation<br />
plot residues were incorporated at the time <strong>of</strong> ploughing where as in no residue plots all the<br />
crop residues were removed after the harvesting and land was ploughed.<br />
586 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Results<br />
The results <strong>of</strong> effect <strong>of</strong> different conservation tillage systems on soil physical and chemical<br />
properties are presented in the table 1. All conservation tillage systems recorded significantly<br />
higher water stable aggregates content over conventional tillage practices. Among the<br />
conservation tillage practices CT 1 and CT 3 revealed higher aggregate stability followed by<br />
CT2 and CT4 whereas CT5 and CT6 recorded significantly lower per cent aggregate stability.<br />
Among the tillage practices, CT 4 recorded significantly higher MWHC <strong>of</strong> the soil (54.0 % )<br />
followed by CT 1 and CT 3. However, CT 5 revealed significantly lower MWHC than<br />
conservation tillage practices (50.6 %). Data showed that tillage systems significantly<br />
influenced the SOC content. Among the tillage practices CT 1 and CT 3 recorded significantly<br />
higher SOC content (8.84 and 8.76 g kg -1 ) over CT5 and CT6 (6.31 and 5.46 g kg -1<br />
respectively). At 15-30 cm depth data showed CT5 recorded significantly higher SOC content<br />
(6.16 g kg -1 ) as compared to rest <strong>of</strong> the tillage practices. In 0-30 cm soil depths, indicating<br />
SOC content <strong>of</strong> surface soil was higher as compared to sub surface In conventional tillage<br />
with no crop residues system, lower soil organic carbon content and further destruction <strong>of</strong><br />
soil aggregates through tillage resulted in loss <strong>of</strong> occluded intra aggregate particulate organic<br />
matter carbon in soil which contribute long term soil carbon sequestration in agricultural soils<br />
(Six et al., 2004).The data on available soil NPK at 0-15cm soil depth showed that tillage<br />
systems significantly influenced the available soil nutrients. Among the tillage practices CT1<br />
recorded significantly higher available soil NPK (290, 41.9 and 449.5 kg ha -1 respectively).<br />
At 15-30 cm soil depth data showed that CT5 and CT6 revealed significantly higher soil<br />
available N (223.6 and 207.9 kg ha -1 respectively) as compared to conservation tillage<br />
practices. The presence <strong>of</strong> mineral soil NPK available for plant uptake is dependent on the<br />
rate <strong>of</strong> carbon mineralisation (Sharma et al., 2021). Retention <strong>of</strong> crop residues might have<br />
reduced the surface area <strong>of</strong> crop biomass for microbial decomposition resulting in slower<br />
decomposition and long duration retention which in-turn helped in release <strong>of</strong> nutrients for a<br />
longer period<br />
Conclusion<br />
Combination <strong>of</strong> no tillage with BBF and FB and crop residues retained on the surface in<br />
groundnut-sorghum system recorded significantly improved soil physical and chemical<br />
properties.<br />
References<br />
Mohanty, A. and Mishra, K. N. 2014. Influence <strong>of</strong> conservation agriculture production<br />
system on available soil nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium and maize equivalent<br />
yield on a fluventic haplustepts in the north central plateau zone <strong>of</strong> Odisha. Trends<br />
in Biosci. 7(23): 3962-3967<br />
587 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Sharma, P. C., Fagodiya, R. K. and Jat, H. S. 2021. Nitrogen management in conservation<br />
agriculture-based cropping systems. Indian J. Fert. 17(11): 1166-1179<br />
Six, J., Bossuyt, H., Degryze, S. and Denef, K. 2004. A history <strong>of</strong> research on the link<br />
between (micro) aggregates, soil biota, and soil organic matter dynamics. Soil Till.<br />
Res. 79: 7-31<br />
Effect <strong>of</strong> different tillage systems on soil physical and chemical properties<br />
Tillage systems CT1 CT2 CT3 CT4 CT5 CT6 S.Em<br />
±<br />
CD<br />
(0.05)<br />
Soil aggregate stability (%) 63.2 62.7 63.0 63.1 61.2 60.6 0.18 0.56<br />
MWHC (%) 53.9 53.8 53.7 54.0 50.6 48.0 0.13 0.38<br />
SOC (g kg -1 ) at 0-15cm depth 8.84 8.68 8.76 8.49 6.31 5.46 0.08 0.25<br />
SOC (g kg -1 ) at 15-30cm depth 5.27 5.30 5.19 5.22 6.16 5.45 0.05 0.16<br />
Available N (kg ha -1 ) at 0-15cm<br />
depth<br />
Available N (kg ha -1 ) at 15-30cm<br />
depth<br />
Available P (kg ha -1 ) at 0-15cm<br />
depth<br />
Available P (kg ha -1 ) at 15-30cm<br />
depth<br />
Available K (kg ha -1 ) at 0-15cm<br />
depth<br />
Available K (kg ha -1 ) at 15-30cm<br />
depth<br />
290.8 286.9 287.5 281.5 270.8 254.2 2.09 6.17<br />
198.8 199.6 199.9 199.0 223.6 207.9 0.61 1.80<br />
41.9 40.3 41.3 40.5 38.4 28.0 0.57 1.68<br />
26.3 26.2 27.1 26.6 31.4 26.8 0.18 0.52<br />
449.5 447.7 448.8 445.8 426.1 376.5 3.54 10.45<br />
384.2 384.0 385.3 383.7 403.7 365.6 0.82 2.43<br />
Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture<br />
588 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
T4a-11R-1127<br />
Co-Application <strong>of</strong> Biochar and Inorganic Fertilizer Improves Soil Fertility and Crop<br />
Productivity in Maize-Groundnut Cropping System in Semi-Arid Alfisols<br />
K. C. Nataraja 1 , S. N. Malleswari Sadhineni 1 , G. Narayana Swamy 1 , Ch. Srinivasarao 2 ,<br />
D. Balaguraviah 1 , M. V. S. Naidu 1 , Y. Reddi Ramu, 1 P. Lavanya Kumari 1 and<br />
T. Giridhara Krishna 1<br />
1 Acharya N.G. Ranga Agricultural University, Andhra Pradesh<br />
2 ICAR-National Academy Agricultural Research Management, Hyderabad - 500030, Telangana<br />
The man induced climate change, posed an adverse impact on soil health and crop<br />
productivity. It is crucial to maintain threshold level <strong>of</strong> organic matter in soil to perform its<br />
agricultural production and environmental functions (Srinivasarao et al., 2014). In this<br />
context, there is a considerable interest in the concept <strong>of</strong> applying biochar to soil as long term<br />
sink for carbon thereby mitigating climate change. In addition to being an important emission<br />
neutral technology, biochar is a multifunctional option. Hence, the addition <strong>of</strong> biochar is<br />
complementary to diverse land uses in semi-arid agro ecosystem (Lal et al., 2018). In light <strong>of</strong><br />
the above scenario, co application <strong>of</strong> biochar and inorganic fertilizer and its effect on crop<br />
growth was evaluated in maize-groundnut cropping system under hot, semi-arid Alfisols <strong>of</strong><br />
southern Andhra Pradesh, India.<br />
Methodology<br />
Field experiment was conducted in split-split plot design with fixed plot for both Kharif and<br />
Rabi during 2018 to 2020 at Agricultural Research Station, Ananthapuramu under Acharya<br />
N.G. Ranga Agricultural University, Andhra Pradesh, India. 75 % Recommended dose <strong>of</strong><br />
inorganic fertilizer (RDF) as (F1) and 100% as (F2). Pigeonpea biochar (B1) and cotton<br />
biochar (B2) and their respective crop residues as (B3 and B4) were treated as sub plots.<br />
Biochar and their respective crop residues were applied at the rate 0 t ha -1 , 2 t ha -1 and 4 t ha -1<br />
as sub - sub plot treatments. All the treatments were applied with common basal dose <strong>of</strong> RDF<br />
for maize during kharif and for groundnut during rabi. Sub plot treatment with 0 t ha -1 <strong>of</strong><br />
fertilizer was considered as fertilized control. Biochar application was only to Kharif maize in<br />
both the years and its residual effect was studied on groundnut during Rabi.<br />
Results<br />
The impact <strong>of</strong> combined application <strong>of</strong> biochar along with RDF in maize-groundnut cropping<br />
system under hot, semi-arid Alfisols is presented in table 1. The pooled statistically analyzed<br />
data reveals that, highest plant height at harvest was recorded in maize with the application <strong>of</strong><br />
100% RDF + pigeonpea biochar @ 4 t ha -1 followed by 2 t ha -1 and fertilized control<br />
treatments. The carry over effect <strong>of</strong> biochar on Rabi groundnut was also noticed the similar<br />
trend. Similarly, the conjunctive use <strong>of</strong> 100% RDF + pigeonpea biochar @ 4 t ha -1 recorded<br />
589 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
highest hundred grain weight (g) or test weight <strong>of</strong> maize during Kharif and highest 100 kernel<br />
weight (g) during rabi with application <strong>of</strong> pigeonpea biochar @ 4 t ha -1 followed 2 t ha -1 and<br />
fertilized control. However, the biomass yield with respect Kharif grown maize and residual<br />
effect <strong>of</strong> biochar on rabi grown groundnut was also followed the similar trend wherein,<br />
pigeonpea biochar @ 4 t ha -1 yielded highest stover yield in maize and highest haulm yield in<br />
groundnut compared to lowest in fertilized control. Besides, available nutrient status in soil<br />
improved. This might be due to positive effect <strong>of</strong> biochar along with inorganic fertilizer<br />
influenced the soil pH, WHC, increased soil available N, P, K and balanced nutrient uptake.<br />
Further, biochar at higher dose effectively promoted nutrient absorption by crop eventually,<br />
more synchronization <strong>of</strong> nutrients to crop growth. The results were in agreement with those<br />
as reported by Feng et al. (2021).<br />
Conclusion<br />
Integrated application <strong>of</strong> pigeonpea biochar @ 4 t ha -1 along with RDF for maize and residual<br />
effect <strong>of</strong> biochar in rabi influenced the soil physico chemical properties and soil fertility,<br />
eventually increased crop growth. Thus, co application <strong>of</strong> biochar and inorganic fertilizer not<br />
only effective in improving soil fertility but also improves crop productivity in semi-arid<br />
Alfisols<br />
Effect <strong>of</strong> co application <strong>of</strong> biochar and inorganic fertilizer on the growth attributes <strong>of</strong><br />
Treatment<br />
Type <strong>of</strong> biochar / Crop residue<br />
maize-groundnut cropping sequence in semi-arid Alfisols.<br />
Plant<br />
height<br />
(cm) at<br />
harvest<br />
Kharif maize<br />
100 grain<br />
weight<br />
(g)<br />
Stover<br />
yield<br />
(kg ha -1 )<br />
Plant<br />
height (cm)<br />
at harvest<br />
Rabi groundnut<br />
100 kernel<br />
weight (g)<br />
Haulm<br />
yield<br />
(kg ha -1 )<br />
B 1 (Pigeonpea ) 203.2 31.62 9542 32.5 44.8 3796<br />
B 2 (Cotton) 202.0 30.85 9405 32.2 44.4 3750<br />
B 3 (Pigeonpea crop residue) 200.3 30.14 9236 31.7 43.3 3691<br />
B 4 (Cotton residue) 198.3 29.59 9095 31.4 43.0 3576<br />
SEm± 1.76 0.32 100.1 0.39 0.14 35.40<br />
LSD (P = 0.05) NS 0.92 292.1 NS 0.40 103.3<br />
Level <strong>of</strong> biochar / Crop residue<br />
S 1 (0 t ha -1 ) 188.3 29.70 8741 29.5 40.9 3187<br />
S 2 (2 t ha -1 ) 205.1 30.58 9439 32.4 44.7 3898<br />
S 3 (4 t ha -1 ) 209.4 31.36 9778 33.9 46.1 4024<br />
SEm± 1.52 0.24 72.7 0.33 0.10 29.27<br />
LSD (P = 0.05) 4.29 0.67 205.4 0.94 0.28 82.7<br />
RDF Fertilizer level<br />
F 1 (75 %) 199.3 30.40 9080 31.1 43.6 3680<br />
Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture<br />
590 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
F 2 (100 %) 202.6 30.70 9559 32.8 44.11 3726<br />
SEm± 1.67 0.29 55.1 0.20 0.12 30.98<br />
LSD (P = 0.05) NS NS 216.3 0.77 NS NS<br />
References<br />
Srinivasarao, Ch., Rattan Lal, Sumanta Kundu, Prasad Babu, M. B. B., Venkateswarlu, B.,<br />
and Anil Kumar, Singh. 2014. Soil carbon sequestration in rainfed production systems<br />
in the semiarid tropics <strong>of</strong> India. Sci. Total Environ. 487: 587-603.<br />
Lal, R., Smith, P., Jungkunst, H. F., Mitsch, W. J., Lehmann, J., Ramachandran Nair, P. K.,<br />
Alex, B., Mc Bratney, Moraes Sa, J. C. D., Schneider, J., Zinn, Y. L., Skorupa, A. L.<br />
A., Zhang, H. L. Minasny, B., Srinivasrao, Ch., and Ravindranath, N. H. 2018. The<br />
carbon sequestration potential <strong>of</strong> terrestrial ecosystems. J Soil Water Conserv. 73(6):<br />
145A-152A.<br />
Feng, W. Y., Yang, F., Cen, R., Liu, J., Qu, Z. Y., and Miao, Q. F. 2021. Effects <strong>of</strong> straw<br />
biochar application on soil temperature, available nitrogen and growth <strong>of</strong> corn. J.<br />
Environ. Manage. 277. Accessed at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111331.<br />
T4a-11aR-1175<br />
Tillage, residue and nutrient management practices influence soil biology and organic<br />
carbon pools <strong>of</strong> sugarcane cropping system in semi-arid tropics<br />
Aliza Pradhan, G C Wakchaure, Dhanashri Shid, and Jagadish Rane<br />
ICAR-National Institute <strong>of</strong> Abiotic Stress Management, Baramati, 413115 MH<br />
Intensive tillage coupled with crop residue burning and conventional agronomic practices in<br />
sugarcane (Saccharum <strong>of</strong>ficinarum L.) cropping system is a serious issue causing soil<br />
degradation and environmental pollution. Globally the principles <strong>of</strong> minimum soil<br />
disturbance, crop residue management and suitable nutrient management practices have<br />
emerged as alternative strategies for enriching the soil resource base (Jat et al., 2019). For a<br />
sustainable agricultural production system, soil organic carbon and soil biology is vital as<br />
they regulate all the other chemical, physical and biological properties (Parihar et al., 2018).<br />
A number <strong>of</strong> research studies have reported the potential <strong>of</strong> these strategies to serve many<br />
ecosystem functions such as enhanced soil enzymatic activity, microbial count, carbon<br />
sequestration, increased resource use efficiency, making the system resilient towards extreme<br />
climate events and climate change mitigation (Choudhary et al., 2018; Datta et al., 2019; Jat<br />
et al., 2019). However, benefits <strong>of</strong> these strategies are needed to be effectively reaped in<br />
sugarcane production system that occupies 5 million ha acreage and utilizes more than 5% <strong>of</strong><br />
country’s irrigation resources on merely 2.6% <strong>of</strong> the net cultivated area and produces 108<br />
million tonnes <strong>of</strong> crop residues, annually. In sugarcane-based cropping system, trash burning<br />
591 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
either before or after harvest is a common practice which not only reduces the amount <strong>of</strong><br />
surface organic matter, soil organic carbon (SOC), essential nutrients, and microbial count<br />
but also causes environmental pollution. Reports on dynamics <strong>of</strong> SOC in different pools and<br />
their relationship with soil biology under climate smart management systems in sugarcane<br />
cropping system is very scanty. Keeping this in view, a field experiment was conducted to<br />
evaluate the effects <strong>of</strong> reduced tillage, residue and nutrient management practices on soil<br />
organic carbon pools, soil biological properties and their interrelationships with system yield<br />
after six years <strong>of</strong> continuous cultivation <strong>of</strong> sugarcane in Semi-arid regions <strong>of</strong> India.<br />
Methodology<br />
During 2016-2022, a field experiment was conducted at ICAR-National Institute <strong>of</strong> Abiotic<br />
Stress Management, Baramati, Maharashtra with hot and semi-arid climate. Majority <strong>of</strong><br />
agricultural area is rainfed with low annual rainfall (584 mm) received mostly in June-<br />
December restricted to south-west (70%) and retreating (21%) monsoons. The predominant<br />
medium black soil (≤ 60 cm depth) at the site was sandy clay in texture (sand, silt, clay, 55.6,<br />
8.3, 36.1, respectively). The pH (1: 2.5 soil: water suspension), EC, available N, P, K and<br />
organic C <strong>of</strong> soil were about 8.1, 0.26 dS m -1 , 172.2, 18.2, 143.8 kg ha -1 and 6.7 g kg -1 ,<br />
respectively. The experiment was laid out in split-split plot design and replicated thrice with<br />
tillage as main plot treatments viz., conventional tillage (CT) and reduced tillage (RT);<br />
residue (R) managements practices i.e. RR (residue retention) and RB (residue burning) in<br />
sub plots and three nutrient management practices <strong>of</strong> different ratios <strong>of</strong> recommended doses<br />
<strong>of</strong> fertilizer (RDF) in sub-sub plots i.e. 25: 75 (N1); 50: 50 (N2); and 75: 25 (N3) during<br />
basal and subsequent fertigation, respectively. Soil samples were collected from (0-15) and<br />
(15-30) cm soil depths after six years <strong>of</strong> the study i.e. after harvest <strong>of</strong> one fresh and four<br />
ratoon sugarcane crops. The soil samples were analyzed for SOC content, its pools, soil<br />
enzymes and microbial counts following the standard operating procedures as followed in<br />
Datta et al., 2015 and Choudhary et al., 2018). Statistical analyses were executed with general<br />
linear models (GLMs) using the “Agricolae” package <strong>of</strong> R (R Development Team, 2011).<br />
Results<br />
Soil enzymes and microbial population<br />
Soil dehydrogenase activity (DHA), alkaline phosphatase activity (APA) and ß-glucosidase<br />
activity (BGA) were significantly affected by tillage, residue and nutrient management<br />
practices (Table 1). In the (0-15) cm soil layer, reduced tillage had 322, 36 and 55% higher<br />
DHA, APA and BGA, respectively than CT. Plots with residue had 83% higher DHA as<br />
compared to residue removal plots. A similar trend was seen for APA and BGA with 16%<br />
higher activity in RR plots than RB. For nutrient management practices, the enzyme<br />
activities were found in order <strong>of</strong> N2 (50% RDF as basal and rest 50% through fertigation) ><br />
Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture<br />
592 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
N3 (75% RDF as basal and 25% through fertigation) > N1 (25% RDF as basal and 75%<br />
through fertigation). Plots under N2 had 64, 11 and 18% higher DHA, APA and BGA,<br />
respectively than N1. A similar trend with lower values was observed at 15-30 cm depth.<br />
Microbial population viz., bacteria, fungi and actinomycetes was significantly affected by<br />
tillage, residue and nutrient management practices. Population <strong>of</strong> bacteria was higher<br />
compared to fungi and actinomycetes at both the soil depths though the counts were lower at<br />
(15-30) cm depth as compared to upper (0-15) cm depth. Compared to CT the counts <strong>of</strong><br />
bacteria, fungi and actinomycetes were 51, 39 and 73% higher in RT and 41, 38 and 72%<br />
higher in RR as compared to RB, respectively. The treatments having application <strong>of</strong> >50% <strong>of</strong><br />
RDF as basal (N2 and N3) had higher microbial population i.e. 40%, 60% and 70% bacteria,<br />
fungi and actinomycetes, respectively as compared to N1.<br />
Effect <strong>of</strong> tillage, residue and nutrient management on soil enzymes and microbial<br />
population<br />
Treatments<br />
Tillage (T)<br />
Dehydrogenase<br />
activity<br />
(µg TPF g -1 h -1 )<br />
Alkaline<br />
phosphatase<br />
activity<br />
(µg p-<br />
nitrophenol<br />
g -1 h -1 )<br />
ß-glucosidase<br />
activity<br />
(µg p-<br />
nitrophenol<br />
g -1 h -1 )<br />
Bacteria<br />
(CFU x 10 10<br />
g -1 soil)<br />
Fungi<br />
(CFU x<br />
10 10 g -1<br />
soil)<br />
0-15 15-30 0-15 15-30 0-15 15-30 0-15 15-30 0-15 15-<br />
30<br />
Actinomycetes<br />
(CFU x 10 10 g -1<br />
soil)<br />
0-15 15-30<br />
CT 21.67 b 17.40 b 203.64 b 197.19 b 17.14 b 16.30 b 7.93 b 6.67 b 5.69 b 4.63 b 4.43 b 3.33 b<br />
RT 91.37 a 85.76 a 276.27 a 268.06 a 26.50 a 25.63 a 11.20 a 10.06 a 7.92 a 7.66 a 7.66 a 7.48 a<br />
Residue (R)<br />
RR 43.13 b 38.61 b 227.00 b 219.45 b 20.61 b 19.73 b 7.95 b 6.78 b 5.68 b 4.64 b 4.43 b 3.41 b<br />
RB 78.79 a 73.58 a 263.50 a 255.54 a 24.98 a 24.08 a 11.19 a 10.99 a 7.83 a 7.66 a 7.61 a 7.49 a<br />
Nutrient (N)<br />
N1 41.56 c 36.69 c 226.57 c 218.86 c 20.04 b 19.12 b 7.93 b 6.86 b 5.63 b 4.59 b 4.47 b 3.43 b<br />
N2 73.24 a 68.97 a 257.26 a 249.81 a 24.61 a 23.68 a 11.17 a 10.94 a 7.87 a 7.68 a 7.59 a 7.53 a<br />
N3 68.08 b 62.63 b 251.93 b 243.82 b 23.74 a 22.91 a 11.11 a 10.86 a 7.77 a 7.69 a 7.52 a 7.39 a<br />
Different lower-case letters within same column show significant difference at P=0.05 as per<br />
Duncan Multiple Range test for mean separation<br />
Soil organic carbon content and its pools<br />
Results showed that total SOC was increased by 12 and 17% under RT and residue retention,<br />
respectively as compared CT and RB plots at 0-15 cm soil depths. In surface layer, active and<br />
passive pool carbon (6.98 and 19.45 Mg C ha-1) was 14% and 18% higher in RR plots as<br />
compared to RB, respectively after six years <strong>of</strong> continuous sugarcane cropping. Again, plots<br />
with residue retention had 63, 34 and 15% higher labile, less labile and non-labile pools,<br />
593 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
respectively as compared to residue burning plots. Below soil layer (15-30) cm also showed a<br />
similar trend with lower values though the effects were non-significant.<br />
Effect <strong>of</strong> tillage, residue and nutrient management on total soil organic carbon and its<br />
pools<br />
Treatments/soil<br />
depths (cm)<br />
Tillage (T)<br />
Total soil organic<br />
carbon (SOC)<br />
(Mg C ha -1 )<br />
Very labile<br />
SOC<br />
(Mg C ha -1 )<br />
0-15 15-30 0-15 15-<br />
30<br />
Labile SOC<br />
(Mg C ha -1 )<br />
0-15 15-<br />
30<br />
Less labile<br />
SOC<br />
(Mg C ha -1 )<br />
0-15 15-<br />
30<br />
Non labile<br />
SOC<br />
(Mg C ha -1 )<br />
Active SOC<br />
pool<br />
(Mg C ha -1 )<br />
0-15 15-30 0-15 15-<br />
30<br />
Passive SOC<br />
pool<br />
(Mg C ha -1 )<br />
0-15 15-30<br />
CT 23.06 b 25.30 a 3.98 a 4.38 a 1.76 a 1.93 a 2.79 a 2.72 a 14.46 b 15.84 a 5.74 a 6.31 a 17.33 a 18.99 a<br />
RT 25.89 a 26.40 a 4.89 a 5.02 a 2.36 a 2.37 a 2.87 a 3.14 a 16.07 a 16.39 a 7.05 a 7.30 a 18.85 a 19.10 a<br />
Residue (R)<br />
RR 22.65 b 24.73 a 4.47 a 4.55 a 1.55 b 1.69 b 2.29 b 2.49 b 14.25 b 15.54 a 6.11 b 6.70 a 16.54 b 18.03 a<br />
RB 26.43 a 26.64 a 4.57 a 5.01 a 2.52 a 2.57 a 3.08 a 3.07 a 16.37 a 16.45 a 6.98 a 7.12 a 19.45 a 19.53 a<br />
Nutrient (N)<br />
N1 24.43 a 24.45 a 4.45 a 4.47 a 1.93 a 1.94 a 2.88 a 2.88 a 15.26 a 15.14 b 6.38 a 6.41 b 18.14 a 18.02 a<br />
N2 24.68 a 26.53 a 4.68 a 5.03 a 2.07 a 2.24 a 2.64 a 2.74 a 15.39 a 16.53 a 6.74 a 7.27 a 17.93 a 19.25 a<br />
N3 24.52 a 26.11 a 4.43 a 4.83 a 2.10 a 2.22 a 2.54 a 2.72 a 15.26 a 16.32 ab 6.52 a 7.05 a 17.91 a 19.06 a<br />
Different lower-case letters within same column show significant difference at P=0.05 as per<br />
Duncan Multiple Range test for mean separation<br />
Conclusion<br />
Minimum soil disturbance with residue retention improved soil organic carbon pools whereas<br />
these practices coupled with appropriate nutrient management practice had higher soil<br />
enzymatic activities and microbial count after six years <strong>of</strong> continuous cropping <strong>of</strong> sugarcane.<br />
Therefore, these practices should be recommended to sugarcane growers for sustainability <strong>of</strong><br />
the cropping system while maintaining the soil resource base.<br />
References<br />
Choudhary, M., Datta, A., Jat, H.S., Yadav, A.K., Gathala, M.K., Sapkota, T.B., Das, A.K.,<br />
Sharma, P.C., Jat, M.L., Singh, R., Ladha, J.K., 2018. Changes in soil biology under<br />
conservation agriculture based sustainable intensification <strong>of</strong> cereal systems in<br />
indoGangetic Plains. Geoderma 313, 193–204.<br />
Datta, A., Basak, N., Chaudhari, S.K., Sharma, D.K., 2015. Soil properties and organic<br />
carbon distribution under different land uses in reclaimed sodic soils <strong>of</strong> north-West<br />
India. Geoderma Reg 4, 134–146.<br />
Jat, H.S., Datta, A., Choudhary, M., Yadav, A.K., Choudhary, V., Sharma, P.C., Gathala,<br />
M.K., Jat, M.L., McDonald, A., 2019. Effects <strong>of</strong> tillage, crop establishment and<br />
diversification on soil organic carbon, aggregation, aggregate associated carbon and<br />
Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture<br />
594 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
productivity in cereal systems <strong>of</strong> semi-arid Northwest India. Soil Tillage Res. 190, 128–<br />
138.<br />
Parihar, C.M., Jat, S.L., Singh, A.K., Datta, A., Parihar, M.D., Varghese, E., Bandyopadhyay,<br />
K.K., Nayak, H.S., Kuri, B.R., Jat, M.L., 2018. Changes in carbon pools and biological<br />
activities <strong>of</strong> a sandy loam soil under medium-term conservation agriculture and<br />
diversified cropping systems. European J. <strong>of</strong> Soil Sci. 69 (5), 902–912.<br />
T4a-12P-1031<br />
Assessment <strong>of</strong> Soil Physical Properties from Different Blocks <strong>of</strong> Jaipur<br />
district, Rajasthan, India<br />
Surykant Sharma*<br />
Sam Higginbottom University <strong>of</strong> Agriculture, Technology and Sciences, Prayagraj – 211007, U.P.<br />
*surykantsharma.ag@gmail.com<br />
Soil is a dynamic natural body formed as a result <strong>of</strong> pedogenic processes by changing rock<br />
climates, including minerals and organic elements, with chemical, physical, mineralogical<br />
and biological properties, with varying depth <strong>of</strong> surface, and providing medium to plant<br />
growth. (Thakre et al.,2012). Because <strong>of</strong> urbanization infrastructural expansion, industrial<br />
growth, and land degradation losses due to rapid erosion and secondary salinization, the<br />
arable land area has been shrinking (Lal, 2013). Generally, the soil types <strong>of</strong> Rajasthan are<br />
sandy, saline, alkaline, and calcareous soils and were commonly called clay, loamy, and<br />
black lava soils. Groundwater level is very low because the annual rainfall is approximately<br />
360 mm and the ground water level very deep. Water is available at depths <strong>of</strong> 100 to 61<br />
meters. The soil <strong>of</strong> the Rajasthan region is classified as Aridisols, Alfisols, Entisol,<br />
Inceptisols and Vertisol according to the USDA Land Division program (Chiroma et al.,<br />
2014). The capital <strong>of</strong> Rajasthan is the state <strong>of</strong> Jaipur, located between 26˚55′10ʺ N and<br />
75˚47′16ʺ E. Jaipur has an average height <strong>of</strong> 1414 feet from sea level and Jaipur 11,152 km 2 .<br />
The weather in Jaipur is desert. The average annual temperature is 25.2°C. The average<br />
rainfall in the Jaipur region is estimated at 650 mm. This type <strong>of</strong> climate and climate are<br />
applicable to kharif crops for example pearl millet, groundnut, cluster bean, sorghum, green<br />
gram and rabies plants wheat, mustard, barley, gram, pea, rapeseed, and taramira. The current<br />
research was conducted to examine the visible soil structures from different blocks in the<br />
Jaipur region (District Fact <strong>Book</strong>, 2019).<br />
Methodology<br />
The study area was marked and divided in 3 blocks and in each block where selected 3<br />
villages from the Jaipur district, they are Keshav Nagar (V 1), Morija (V 2), Nindola (V 3) in<br />
Chomu block (B1), Goner (V4), Shrikishanpura (V5) and Durgapura (V6), block in Sanganer<br />
595 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
(B2), and Shivpuri (V7), Manoharpur (V8), Nwalpura (V9), block in Shahpura (B3). At<br />
collection <strong>of</strong> soil sampling site-, twenty-seven soil samples were collected at different depths<br />
<strong>of</strong> 0-15 cm, 15-30 cm and 30-45 cm. Soil samples were collected randomly from a site using<br />
Khurpi and Phawrah and Auger the depth <strong>of</strong> (a) 0-15cm, (b) 15-30cm, (c) 30-45 cm.<br />
Composite soil samples (by the process <strong>of</strong> conning and quartering method) was collected by<br />
Stratified soil sampling. After collecting the soil samples, they were analysed following<br />
standard laboratory procedures. brought to the laboratory.<br />
Results<br />
The results showed in soils from different villages <strong>of</strong> most <strong>of</strong> Jaipur district soils, Sandy<br />
Loam Texture was discovered at three depths (0-15 cm, 15-30 cm, and 30-45 cm) (Table-2).<br />
The percentages <strong>of</strong> sand, silt, and clay ranged from 60.11 to 72.60 percent, 13.35 to 24.59<br />
percent, and 12.35 to 15.62 percent, respectively. The soil color <strong>of</strong> soil also noticed in both<br />
the Air- dry condition and wet condition. The Soil color was Light Yellowish-Brown<br />
(10YR6/4) color to brownish yellow (10YR5/8) (Table-3). The results showed in soils from<br />
different villages The maximum bulk density was 1.35 Mg m -3 at 30-45 cm in village Morija<br />
(V 2), and the lowest bulk density was 1.22 Mg m -3 at 0-15 cm in village Nwalpura (V 9). with<br />
increasing soil depths, the bulk density increases. At depth 30-45 cm in village Morija (V2),<br />
the maximum particle density was 2.37 Mg m -3 , while at 0-15 cm in village Shivpuri, the<br />
minimum particle density was 2.24 Mg m -3 (V7). Bulk density is lower than particle density.<br />
The largest percent pore space was reported at 0-15 cm in village Keshav Nagar (V 1), while<br />
the smallest percent pore space was measured at 30-45 cm in village Shivpuri (V 7). The %<br />
pore space decreases sharply as depth increases. The maximum water holding capacity was<br />
found 60.12 % at 0-15cm in village Nwalpura (V 9 ) and minimum water holding capacity %<br />
was found 41.27 % at 30-45 cm in village Morija (V 2 ) (Table-1). These variations were due<br />
to clay, silt and organic carbon content and low Water holding capacity in sandy soils due to<br />
high sand and less clay content. However, in Village Shivpuri (V7) had the highest specific<br />
gravity <strong>of</strong> 2.56 at 30-45 cm, while village Morija had the lowest specific gravity <strong>of</strong> 2.33 at 0-<br />
15 cm (V 2). Clay, silt, and organic carbon concentration all played a role, as did low Water<br />
holding capacity in sandy soils due to high sand and low clay content.<br />
Conclusion<br />
The soil <strong>of</strong> investigated area was sandy loam textured soil.<br />
The soil color was light<br />
Yellowish-Brown to brownish yellow which signifies a good organic matter. Improve <strong>of</strong> soil<br />
health by using organic manure and bio fertilizers and improve soil physical condition at<br />
study area, depth from upper to lower soil layers pore space % decrease because soil<br />
compacted, that is not suitable for good soil aeration. Growing Bajara, Mustard, Barley,<br />
Wheat, Tomato, Cole crops and Gram crops are suitable at present study area.<br />
Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture<br />
596 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
References<br />
Chiroma, A. K. and Singh, J. S. 2014. Soil characteristics and vegetation development <strong>of</strong> an<br />
age series <strong>of</strong> mine spoil in a dry tropical environment. Vegetation, 97: 63–76.<br />
District Factbook. 2019. Rajasthan District Factbook Jaipur district. Key Socio-economic<br />
Data <strong>of</strong> Jaipur district, Rajasthan. District Pr<strong>of</strong>ile – Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Jaipur<br />
2019.<br />
Lal, R. 2013. Soil and Sanskriti. J. Indian Soc. Soil Sci., 61: 267-274<br />
Thakre Y. G., Dr. Choudhary M. D., Dr. Raut R. D. 2012. Physicochemical Characterization<br />
<strong>of</strong> Red and Black Soils <strong>of</strong> Wardha Region, Int. J. Chem. and Phys. Sci.,1(2): 60-65.<br />
T4a-13P-1301<br />
Appraisal <strong>of</strong> Some Soil Physical Properties and Available Micronutrients under<br />
Organic and Conventional Farming Systems in an Inceptisol<br />
Priyanka Meena, Y.S. Shivay and Manoj Shrivastava<br />
ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110012, India<br />
priyankameena28@gmail.com, manojshrivastava31@gmail.com<br />
Worldwide land under organic farming in 2017-18 encompassed more than 69.8 million<br />
hectares and India has around 1.78 m ha under organic farming. Trace elements have<br />
important role in plant and animal nutrition and their deficiencies and toxicities cause adverse<br />
effects on plant growth. There is a need to maintain optimal concentrations <strong>of</strong> micronutrients<br />
in soil and plant to the attainment <strong>of</strong> optimum economic yields <strong>of</strong> crops and animal<br />
productivity and welfare. A field study has been conducted to investigate the available<br />
micronutrients in different aggregates under organic and conventional farming practices. The<br />
field experiment was, thus, conducted at the research farm <strong>of</strong> the Indian Agricultural<br />
Research Institute, New Delhi on sandy clay-loam soil starting from Kharif 2006 under the<br />
rice-wheat cropping system. The experiment was laid out in a randomized block design with<br />
three replications and eight treatments in a set. The treatments consisted <strong>of</strong> control (T1),<br />
farmyard manure (FYM@ 10 t/ha) applied to only rice (T2); FYM @ 10 t/ha applied to only<br />
wheat (T3); FYM @ 10 t/ha applied to rice and wheat (T4); Sesbania green manure (SGM) to<br />
rice and Leucaena green leaf manuring (LGLM) to wheat (T5); SGM+Blue Green Algae<br />
(BGA) and LGLM+Azotobacter to wheat (T6); SGM+FYM to rice and LGLM+FYM to<br />
wheat (T7); and SGM+FYM+BGA to rice and LGLM+FYM+Azotobacter to wheat (T8). In<br />
this study, the effect <strong>of</strong> organic amendments was evaluated on physical soil properties i.e.,<br />
different size aggregates and yield <strong>of</strong> the respective system by sampling the soil from three<br />
depths (0-15, 15-30, and 30-60 cm) for two seasons in rice and wheat (2020-2021 and 2021-<br />
2022). The results were found to be improved in T8 in the case <strong>of</strong> the yield <strong>of</strong> rice and wheat.<br />
597 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Although the soil aggregate was significantly affected by organic amendments, but the<br />
maximum Mean weight diameter (MWD) was observed in T8 followed by T7, T6, and T4 at<br />
the soil depths <strong>of</strong> 0-15 cm. A similar trend was observed in the other depths. The<br />
concentration <strong>of</strong> Zn, Mn, Fe, and Cu was found significantly higher in 0-15 cm soil depth as<br />
compared to other depths. Our results clearly indicated that the cumulative effect <strong>of</strong><br />
GM+FYM+BGA leads to increased productivity, improved soil physical properties, and as<br />
well as micronutrient availability.<br />
T4a-14P-1580<br />
Conservation Agriculture Approach as Climate Change Mitigation<br />
Pooja Jena 1 , Arabind Kumar Sinha 2 , Shailabala Dei 1 , A.S. Tigga 1 and Basant Kumar<br />
Rajak 3*<br />
1 Bihar agricultural University, Sabour (Bihar)<br />
2 Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Bhagalpur (Bihar)<br />
3 Atal Bihari Vajapeyi Institute for Good Governance & Policy Analysis (AIGGP), Bhopal (Madhya<br />
Pradesh)<br />
*basant.rajak@gmail.com<br />
Climate change is undoubtedly induced and accelerated by human activity and can pose a<br />
serious threat to mankind by reducing food production. Significant weather aberrations in<br />
form <strong>of</strong> the uneven precipitation pattern, more frequent and intense occurrence <strong>of</strong><br />
temperature fluctuations accompanied by changes in wind intensity and frequency, amount <strong>of</strong><br />
clouds, intensity and quality <strong>of</strong> sunlight can be expected. Maybe the most vulnerable sector<br />
affected by climate change is agriculture. So, it is important to mitigate and adapt to a new<br />
situation through different and most adaptable agricultural strategies. There is a need to<br />
quantify agriculture’s potential to sequester carbon (C) to inform global approaches aimed at<br />
mitigating climate change effects. Many factors including climate, crop, soil management<br />
practices, and soil type can influence the contribution <strong>of</strong> agriculture to the global carbon<br />
cycle. Conservation agriculture is as an approach to farming that seeks to increase food<br />
security, alleviate poverty, conserve biodiversity and safeguard ecosystem services.<br />
Conservation agriculture practices can also contribute to making agricultural systems more<br />
resilient to climate change. Conservation agriculture increases and sustains the crop<br />
productivities, mitigates greenhouse gas emissions from agriculture by enhancing soil carbon<br />
sequestration, improving soil nutrient status and water use efficiencies, and reducing fuel<br />
consumption. Mainstreaming <strong>of</strong> Conservation agriculture systems in India is hindered by its<br />
knowledge gap, inadequate farm machineries and tools, small holdings, poor infrastructures,<br />
and lack <strong>of</strong> conservation agriculture friendly policy support.<br />
Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture<br />
598 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
T4a-15P - 1061<br />
Conservation Agriculture in Himalayan States <strong>of</strong> India: Prospects and<br />
Research Challenges Ahead<br />
Raman Jeet Singh*, N.K. Sharma, Gopal Kumar, Trisha Roy, Uday Mandal, A.K.<br />
Gupta, Rama Pal, J.S. Deshwal and M. Madhu<br />
ICAR-Indian Institute <strong>of</strong> Soil and Water Conservation, Dehradun 248 195<br />
*rdxsingh@gmail.com<br />
Issues <strong>of</strong> conservation have assumed importance in view <strong>of</strong> widespread resource degradation<br />
and the need to reduce production costs, increase pr<strong>of</strong>itability and make agriculture more<br />
competitive. Conservation Agriculture (CA) which has its roots in universal principles <strong>of</strong><br />
providing permanent soil cover (through crop residues, cover crops, and agro-forestry),<br />
minimum soil disturbance, and crop rotations is now considered the principal road to<br />
sustainable agriculture (FAO, 2014). Soil tillage and particularly the plough, in hilly regions<br />
<strong>of</strong> the world, has become part <strong>of</strong> the culture <strong>of</strong> crop production. Ploughing, cultivation and<br />
tillage are <strong>of</strong>ten synonyms for growing a crop. Although the concept <strong>of</strong> CA is universally<br />
applicable, this does not mean that the techniques and practices for hilly region are readily<br />
available (Sharma et al., 2014). Depending on the specific farming situation and agroecological<br />
conditions, the actual CA practice has to be developed locally. Especially, the crop<br />
rotations, selections <strong>of</strong> cover crops, issues <strong>of</strong> integration <strong>of</strong> crop and livestock have to be<br />
revealed and decided upon by the farmers in a given location. A diversity <strong>of</strong> problems arises,<br />
very <strong>of</strong>ten around weed management, residue management, equipment handling and settings,<br />
planting parameters like time and depth, which need to be addressed. Similarly, issues like<br />
steep slope, undulating topography and fragmented land holdings in hilly region are to be<br />
addressed which are major constraint in adopting CA. CA needs to be understood in a<br />
broader perspective in Himalayan states <strong>of</strong> India. It should be practiced in such a way that<br />
both soil and water conservation methods are mutually reinforced (Sharma et al., 2005).<br />
Although favourable results have been obtained with reduced tillage/no-tillage systems in<br />
many cases, there are some problems associated with them in adopting it to hilly region. One<br />
major problem in hilly regions is limited availability <strong>of</strong> crop residue and its utilization for<br />
feed and fuel. Reduced tillage systems <strong>of</strong> developed countries/Indo-Gangetic Plains (IGP)<br />
cannot be copied in toto without modification in India/hilly states especially in sloping<br />
agricultural conditions, albeit with caution and the prevailing soil, climatic, social, and<br />
economic conditions <strong>of</strong> the region must be considered (Jat et al., 2021). Therefore, the real<br />
challenge lies in finding ways and means <strong>of</strong> sparing the crop residue for conservation farming<br />
and evolving alternative strategies for meeting fodder requirements <strong>of</strong> livestock in the region.<br />
CA practices has to be adopted holistically so that it minimizes soil loss, conserve water and<br />
599 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
controls weeds, all <strong>of</strong> which are essential for sustainable and successful crop production<br />
under Himalayan states <strong>of</strong> India.<br />
References<br />
FAO. 2014. What is conservation agriculture? http://www.fao.org/ag/ca/1a.html<br />
Jat R A, Jinger D, Kumar K, Singh R J, Jat S L, Dinesh D, Kumar A, and Sharma N K. 2021.<br />
Scaling-Up <strong>of</strong> Conservation Agriculture for Climate Change Resilient Agriculture in<br />
South Asia. pp. 351-380. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77935-1_11 In book: Wani<br />
S, Raju K V, and Bhattacharyya T. (Eds.), Scaling-up Solutions for Farmers. Springer<br />
Nature. ISBN 978-3-030-77934-4 ISBN 978-3-030-77935-1 (e<strong>Book</strong>)<br />
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77935-1<br />
Sharma A R, Singh R, and Dhyani S K. 2005. Conservation tillage and mulching for<br />
optimizing productivity in maize-wheat cropping system in the outer western Himalaya<br />
region – a review. Indian Journal <strong>of</strong> Soil Conservation 33(1): 35–41.<br />
Sharma N K, Ghosh B N, Mandal D, Singh R J, and Mishra P K. 2014. Conservation<br />
agriculture for resource conservation in North-Western Himalayan region. In:<br />
Somasundaram J, Choudhary R S, Subbarao A, Hati K M, Sinha N K, Vasanda-coumar<br />
M (eds) Conservation agriculture for carbon sequestration and sustaining soil health.<br />
New India Publishing Agency, New Delhi, pp 105–126.<br />
Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture<br />
T4a-16P- 1221<br />
Direct Seeding in Rice: A Resource Conservation Technology in Scarce<br />
Rainfall Zone <strong>of</strong> Kurnool district, A.P.<br />
M. Sudhakar, G. Dhanalakshmi, K.V. Ramanaiah and E. Ravi Goud<br />
Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Yagantipalli. Kurnool dist. A.P-518124<br />
Rice (Oryza sativa), the staple food <strong>of</strong> more than half <strong>of</strong> the population <strong>of</strong> the world, ia an<br />
important target to provide food security and livelihoods for millions. Imminent water crisis,<br />
water demanding nature <strong>of</strong> transplanted rice has deleterious effects on the Soil environment.<br />
Nearly 30% <strong>of</strong> total Water (1,400 – 1,800 mm) used in rice culture is consumed mainly<br />
during Puddling and increased labour cost for transplanting leads to search for alternative<br />
management method. Direct seeding in Rice overcomes the problem <strong>of</strong> labour requirement<br />
for rice nursery raising and transplanting operations. Direct seeding in Rice facilitates timely<br />
sowing <strong>of</strong> crop in Command areas and taking up succeeding crops leading to increase water<br />
productivity, system sustainability and pr<strong>of</strong>itability.<br />
Thirty on-farm demonstrations were conducted on Direct seeding in Rice in different<br />
locations <strong>of</strong> Banaganapalli, Serivella and Gosapadu mandals <strong>of</strong> Kurnool district during<br />
600 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
consecutive years <strong>of</strong> 2017-18,2018-19 and 2019-20 under command area. Rice crop was<br />
sown immediately after receipt <strong>of</strong> monsoons at optimum soil moisture with pre-emergence<br />
application <strong>of</strong> pendimethalin @ 2.5 lit /ha was taken up in all demonstrations. The results <strong>of</strong><br />
the demonstrations revealed that the mean grain yield <strong>of</strong> direct seeded rice was 7453 kg/ ha,<br />
while transplanting method was 7125 kg/ha. Net returns with direct seeded rice was Rs<br />
79154/ha compared to transplanting method <strong>of</strong> Rs 56700/ha. The increased net returns in<br />
direct seeded rice due to less cost <strong>of</strong> cultivation.<br />
Direct seeded rice has been believed to be an optimal option for rice production. This shift<br />
would sustainably reduce crop water requirement and emission <strong>of</strong> green house gases. In<br />
transplanted rice with Puddling and transplanting is one <strong>of</strong> the major sources <strong>of</strong> methane<br />
emissions. More over, direct seeded rice uses 15-20 per cent less water than transplanted<br />
flooded rice and reduces methane emission by 18% percent. The reduced emission <strong>of</strong> these<br />
gases helps in climate change adaptation and mitigation, organic matter turnovers, Carbon<br />
sequestration and also provides opportunity for crop intensification.<br />
T4a-17P-1467<br />
Effect <strong>of</strong> Bio Regulators Along with Organics on Growth and Yield <strong>of</strong><br />
Gundumalli (Jasminum sambac Ait.)<br />
V. Velmurugan, R. Sendhilnathan, M. Punithavathi, V. Sangeetha,<br />
V.E. Nethaji Mariappan and P. Dominic Manoj<br />
ICAR – Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Hans Roever Campus, Perambalur District, Tamil Nadu - 621115<br />
Department <strong>of</strong> Horticulture, Annamalai University, Annamalainagar-608002. T.N. India<br />
kvk.perambalur@icar.gov.in, kvkroever@gmail.com<br />
Effect <strong>of</strong> bio regulators along with organics on growth and yield <strong>of</strong> Gundumalli<br />
(Jasminumsambac Ait.) was taken up in a floriculture unit, Annamalai University at<br />
Annamalainagar during 2011-2013.The experiment was conducted by using different organic<br />
manures viz., FYM, vermicompost and whereas bioregulators like Naphthalene acidic acid,<br />
Gibberllic acid and panchagavya was given as foliar application. The experiment was laid out<br />
in Randomized Block Design with 10 treatment combinations in three replications. The<br />
growth parameters viz., plant height, number <strong>of</strong> primary shoots, number <strong>of</strong> secondary shoots,<br />
number <strong>of</strong> leaves per plant, leaf area, number <strong>of</strong> productive shoots and chlorophyll content<br />
registered the highest when application <strong>of</strong> vermicompost @ 2.5 t ha -1 along with foliar spray<br />
panchagavya 3 percent. The flowering and flower bud characters, viz., early commencement<br />
<strong>of</strong> flowering, length <strong>of</strong> flower bud, flower bud diameter, corolla tube length, bud length<br />
without corolla and flower yield characteristics viz., hundred bud weight, flower yield per<br />
plant, flower yield per hectare and the quality character like shelf life also registered the<br />
highest in the treatment combination <strong>of</strong> vermicompost @ 2.5 t ha -1 along with foliar spray<br />
601 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
panchagavya 3 per cent. The nutrient contents (NPK) <strong>of</strong> the plant tissues also registered the<br />
highest when vermicompost @ 2.5 t ha -1 along with foliar spray panchagavya 3 per cent was<br />
applied. With regard to the postharvest available soil nutrients, the results revealed that<br />
application <strong>of</strong> vermicompost @ 2.5 t ha -1 along with foliar spray panchagavya 3 per cent<br />
recorded the highest organic content in soil. Hence it could be concluded that the treatment<br />
combination <strong>of</strong> vermicompost @ 2.5 t ha -1 along with foliar spray panchagavya 3 per cent is<br />
best suited to grow Gundumalli (JasminumsambacAit.) in field condition to achieve good<br />
growth, pr<strong>of</strong>use flowering and flower yield.<br />
T4a-18P- 1226<br />
Effect <strong>of</strong> Life Saving Irrigation on Yield and Economics <strong>of</strong> Different Kharif<br />
and Rabi Crops under Dryland Conditions<br />
<br />
K. Tiwari*, S. M. Kurmvanshi, Abhishek Soni, G. D. Sharma, S. Pandey and<br />
<br />
S. S. Baghel<br />
All India coordinated Research Project on Dryland Agriculture, JNKVV, College <strong>of</strong> Agriculture,<br />
Rewa 486001 (M.P.)<br />
*rktkvkrewa@rediffmail.com<br />
In dryland area the distribution <strong>of</strong> rainfall is highly erratic and the occurrence <strong>of</strong> dry spells<br />
during the crop growth stages is indispensable resulting in failure <strong>of</strong> crop or realization <strong>of</strong><br />
uneconomical yield. Harvesting <strong>of</strong> rainwater through farm ponds during the rainy season and<br />
recycling it for use as supplemental irrigation at the critical stages <strong>of</strong> the crop can help to<br />
mitigate the effect <strong>of</strong> dry spells and to overcome the loss <strong>of</strong> yield under dryland condition for<br />
Rabi cropping after Kharif. Several researchers have shown that on farm in-situ run <strong>of</strong>f<br />
collection <strong>of</strong> rainwater in to farm ponds and its utilization in dry spells as supplemental<br />
irrigation can increase and stabilize the crop production (Krishna et al. 1987).<br />
Methodology<br />
This experiment was conducted 2017-18 to 2020-21 and pooled data has been presented for<br />
study purpose. The experimental soil is silty clay loam, medium in organic carbon and low in<br />
available nitrogen and Phosphorus while potassium status was medium. Water harvesting<br />
tank size is 60 m X 30 m. Total harvested water was 3867m 3 while 1850 m 3 water was used<br />
for irrigation. Water losses through seepage and evaporation was 1160 M 3 . During Kharif<br />
Soybean and Rice crops were grown under dryland condition while in Rabi wheat, chickpea,<br />
Mustard and coriander crops were taken which were given supplemental life saving irrigation<br />
from water harvested pond. All the crops were fertilized by recommended doses <strong>of</strong> fertilizers<br />
under dryland condition.<br />
Results<br />
Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture<br />
602 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
After perusal <strong>of</strong> the results, it is evident that impact <strong>of</strong> life saving irrigation was 16.16% in<br />
wheat, 27.40% in chickpea, 24.54% in mustard and 19.58% in coriander when these crops<br />
were grown after rice. Wheat, chickpea, mustard and corriander were grown after soybean<br />
also showed variation in yield under control and life saving irrigation conditions. Grain yield<br />
<strong>of</strong> wheat was increased by 18.32%, gram by 27.17%, mustard by 23.23% when grown after<br />
soybean. Yield <strong>of</strong> coriander was increased by 7.1% when grown after soybean under the<br />
influence <strong>of</strong> one life saving irrigation. Similar findings were also reported by Nagdeve, and<br />
Patode, (2012).<br />
Residual effect <strong>of</strong> soybean on grain yield <strong>of</strong> wheat, Chickpea, mustard and coriander was<br />
more when these crops were taken after soybean as compared to rice.<br />
Effect <strong>of</strong> life saving irrigation on grain yield <strong>of</strong> Kharif and Rabi crops.<br />
Crop Control Life saving irrigation<br />
Soybean 532 689<br />
Rice 1617 1730<br />
Cropping<br />
system<br />
Wheat Chickpea Mustard Coriander<br />
After rice Control 1448 551 383 143<br />
Life saving<br />
irrigation<br />
1682<br />
(16.16%)<br />
702<br />
(27.40%)<br />
477<br />
(24.54%)<br />
After soybean Control 1479 564 396 183<br />
Life saving 1750 717<br />
irrigation (18.32%) (27.12%)<br />
Figures in parentheses are % increases in yield over control<br />
488<br />
(23.23%)<br />
Effect <strong>of</strong> life saving irrigation on net pr<strong>of</strong>it <strong>of</strong> Kharif and Rabi crops<br />
Crop (Kharif) Control Life saving irrigation Mean<br />
Soybean 6370 10220 (60.43%) 8295<br />
Rice 9358 10162 (8.59%) 9760<br />
Mean 7864 10191<br />
171<br />
(19.58%)<br />
196<br />
(7.10%)<br />
Rabi Wheat Chickpea Mustard Coriander Mean<br />
After rice Control 1908 3868 5256 5466 4124.5<br />
After<br />
soybean<br />
LSI 3335<br />
(74.79%)<br />
11050<br />
(185.67%)<br />
6648<br />
(26.48%)<br />
10780<br />
(97.21%)<br />
7954.5<br />
Control 1003 5038 5655 7866 4890.5<br />
LSI 6088<br />
(506.97%)<br />
12464<br />
(147.39%)<br />
7489<br />
(32.43%)<br />
12280<br />
(56.11%)<br />
9580.5<br />
603 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Mean 3083.5 6511 6262 9098<br />
Figures in parentheses are % increase over control<br />
References<br />
Krishan, J. H., Arkin, G. F., and Wartin, J. R. 1987. Run <strong>of</strong> impoundment for supplemental<br />
irrigation in texas. Water Resource Bull. 23 (6):1057-1061.<br />
Nagdeve, M. B., and Patode, R. S. 2012. Protective irrigation through farm pond for<br />
enhancing crop productivity. Application technologies for harvested rainwater in farm<br />
ponds. In: proceeding <strong>of</strong> national consultation meeting held at CRIDA, Hyderabad. Pp:<br />
62-67.<br />
T4a-19P - 1205<br />
Effect <strong>of</strong> Long-Term Conservation Agriculture on Labile and Total Soil<br />
Organic Carbon Fractions <strong>of</strong> Rainfed Pearl Millet-Based Cropping<br />
Systems <strong>of</strong> India<br />
Amresh Chaudhary, M. C. Meena, S. P. Datta, A. Dey, R. S. Bana and D. M. Mahalla<br />
ICAR – Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi -12, India<br />
Conservation agriculture improves soil organic carbon concentration in surface soils but the<br />
increase in the SOC concentration are site-specific all over the world. The dynamics <strong>of</strong> SOC<br />
in CA is presented through assessment <strong>of</strong> management-induced changes in different fractions<br />
<strong>of</strong> SOC. Recent researches on SOC are focused on the quality <strong>of</strong> SOC, and its fractions are<br />
used as indicators <strong>of</strong> soil quality. The labile fractions include cold water extractable organic<br />
carbon (CWEOC); hot-water extractable organic carbon (HWEOC) and active carbon (AC).<br />
These fractions have small turnover time ranging from days to years. The non-labile fractions<br />
are chemically less active and are mainly responsible soil carbon sequestration. Yet, the<br />
information regarding SOC dynamics <strong>of</strong> labile and total organic carbon fractions are not<br />
sufficiently available under rainfed conservation agriculture. Therefore, we hypothesized that<br />
adoption <strong>of</strong> different tillage, residue management and cropping systems under rainfed pearl<br />
millet cropping systems have varied response for labile as well total soil organic carbon.<br />
Methodology<br />
A field experiment was initiated during rainy season <strong>of</strong> 2012–13 in the Research Farm <strong>of</strong><br />
ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi. Geographically, Delhi is situated<br />
between latitude <strong>of</strong> 28°37 and 28°39 N and longitude <strong>of</strong> 77°9 and 77°11 E at an altitude <strong>of</strong><br />
225.7 meter above mean sea level. It has semi-arid, sub-humid and subtropical climate with<br />
hot dry summer and severe cold winter. The Experimental plot consists <strong>of</strong> four tillage<br />
practices (Zero-Tillage with residues – ZTR, Zero-Tillage without residues – ZT-(R);<br />
Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture<br />
604 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
conventional Tillage – CT) and fallow fields which is not tilled and grass cover is maintained<br />
throughout the year. three cropping systems (Pearl millet- chickpea – PM-C, Pearl Millet-<br />
Chickpea- Fodder Pearl Millet – PM-C-FPM and Pearl Millet-Chickpea- Mung bean- PM-C-<br />
M) in split plot design. After eight years <strong>of</strong> completion <strong>of</strong> cropping cycle, fresh and moist soil<br />
samples are taken from 0-5, 5-15 and 15-30 cm <strong>of</strong> soil depth from each treatment and<br />
analysed for different labile pools <strong>of</strong> SOC including cold water extractable organic carbon<br />
(CWEOC); hot-water extractable organic carbon (HWEOC); Active carbon (AC) and total<br />
SOC. CWEOC is quantitatively very close to dissolved organic carbon whereas the HWEOC<br />
consists <strong>of</strong> more stable components that form the close reserve <strong>of</strong> nutrients and energy for<br />
plants and microorganisms. Similarly, AC determined through 0.002 M potassium<br />
permanganate is an active SOC pool and is well suited to track management practices that<br />
promote soil C sequestration, making it a particularly useful indicator for soil quality<br />
research. (Weil et al., 2003). The Total soil organic carbon was analysed through CHNS<br />
analyzer. Data were statistically analyzed by one-way analysis <strong>of</strong> variance (ANOVA) using<br />
doebioresearch package in R s<strong>of</strong>tware (R Core Team (2022).<br />
Results<br />
CWEOC was the highest in the surface than in the sub-soil layers under every tillage and<br />
cropping system treatments. CWEOC was similar for ZT+R, fallow and CT tillage practices<br />
and these were higher compared to ZT-R treatment at 0-5 cm depth whereas at 5-15 cm depth<br />
only ZT+R is significantly higher than other treatments. All the treatments remain nonsignificant<br />
at 15-30 cm soil depth. There was no significant difference between cropping<br />
systems throughout the soil depths. The interaction between tillage and cropping systems<br />
were significant at 0-5 and 5-15 cm <strong>of</strong> soil depth. The highest CWEOC were observed in<br />
ZT+R: PM-C-M (0.098 g kg -1 ) and ZT+R:PM-C-FPM (0.105 g kg -1 ) respectively at 0-5 cm<br />
depth. Similarly, ZT+R: PM-C-M (0.10 g kg -1 ) and ZT+R:PM-C-FPM (0.10 g kg -1 )<br />
treatments observed highest CWEOC at 5-15 cm soil depth and at 15-30 cm <strong>of</strong> soil depth<br />
CWEOC ranges between 0.098 to 0.067 g kg -1 . The concentration <strong>of</strong> HWEOC was almost 2.8<br />
times higher as compared to CWEOC at 0-5 cm depth. HWEOC also higher at surface (0-5<br />
cm) than subsurface soil depths (5-15 and 15-30 cm). HWEOC content was highest in ZT+R<br />
and fallow treatments as compared to ZT-R and CT treatments at 0-5 cm soil depths.<br />
HWEOC was 3.28 times higher as compared to CWEOC at 5-15 cm soil depth. HWEOC was<br />
highest in fallow (0.164 g kg -1 ) and CT (0.174 g kg -1 ) treatments as compared to ZT-R<br />
treatments (0.121 g kg -1 ) whereas at 15-30 cm, treatments follow the trend: fallow> ZT+R =<br />
CT> ZT-R. AC follow similar trend <strong>of</strong> HWEOC and CWEOC. AC was highest in ZT+R and<br />
ZT-R treatments as compared to CT and fallow treatments at 0-5 cm soil depth but there was<br />
no significant difference among tillage practices at 5-15and 15-30 cm <strong>of</strong> soil depth. The<br />
highest AC content was observed in PM-C-M (0.509 g kg -1 ) and PM-C-FPM (0.475 g kg -1 ) at<br />
0-5 cm soil depth. The interaction <strong>of</strong> tillage and cropping systems were significant at 0-5 and<br />
605 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
5-15 cm soil depth (Table). The TOC content was highest in ZT+R (8.487 g kg -1 ) which is<br />
83.82 % higher than CT (4.617 g kg -1 ) whereas fallow has highest total SOC content in 5-15<br />
and 15-30 cm respectively.<br />
Conclusion<br />
From this study, it can be concluded that labile pools <strong>of</strong> soil organic carbon such as CWEOC,<br />
HWEOC and AC as well as total SOC content are sensitive to changes in tillage as well<br />
cropping systems under different soil depths in rainfed pearl millet-based cropping systems.<br />
The adoption conservation tillage with residue retention on soil surface and crop rotation with<br />
legumes improves soil organic carbon content and quality as compared to conventional tillage<br />
systems.<br />
Depth distribution <strong>of</strong> labile soil organic carbon fractions<br />
Treatment/depth CWEOC (g kg -1 ) HWEOC (g kg -1 ) AC (g kg -1 )<br />
Tillage<br />
0-5 cm<br />
5-15<br />
cm<br />
15-30<br />
cm<br />
0-5<br />
cm<br />
5-15<br />
cm<br />
15-30<br />
cm<br />
0-5 cm<br />
5-15<br />
cm<br />
15-30<br />
cm<br />
ZT+R 0.097 a 0.088 a 0.077 0.287 a 0.154 b 0.111 b 0.527 a 0.435 0.226<br />
ZT-R 0.062 b 0.037 b 0.078 0.191 b 0.121 c 0.0945 c 0.474 ab 0.456 0.224<br />
CT 0.093 a 0.030 b 0.084 0.179 b 0.174 a 0.111 b 0.443 bc 0.389 0.233<br />
Fallow 0.0794 ab 0.032 b 0.068 0.277 a 0.164 ab 0.132 a 0.367 c 0.305 0.181<br />
Cropping systems<br />
PM-C-M 0.083 0.059 a 0.087 0.218 b 0.153 ab 0.108 b 0.509 a 0.432 0.225<br />
PM-C-<br />
FPM 0.087 0.039 b 0.075 0.220 b 0.137 b 0.115 b 0.475 ab 0.421 0.217<br />
PM-C 0.0818 0.055 a 0.077 0.217 b 0.160 a 0.093 c 0.462 b 0.427 0.242<br />
fallow 0.0794 0.032 b 0.068 0.277 a 0.164 a 0.132 a 0.367 c 0.305 0.181<br />
References<br />
R Core Team. 2022. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation<br />
for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL https://www.R-project.org/.<br />
Weil, R.R., Islam, K.R., Stine, M.A., Gruver, J.B. and Samson-Liebig, S.E. 2003. Estimating<br />
active carbon for soil quality assessment: A simplified method for laboratory and field<br />
use. American J. Alternative Agric., 18(1): 3-17.<br />
Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture<br />
606 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
T4a-20P-1324<br />
Effect <strong>of</strong> Organic and Inorganic Nutrient Management Practices on<br />
Growth and Yield <strong>of</strong> Maize under Sub-Tropical Kandi area Jammu region<br />
Brinder Singh 1* , A.P. Singh 1 , G. Ravindra Chary 2 , Gopinath 2 , Jai Kumar 1 , Rohit<br />
Sharma 1 , A. P. Rai 1 and Sunny Raina 1<br />
1 All India Coordinated Project for Dryland agriculture, Rakh-Dhiansar, Samba (UT <strong>of</strong> J&K)<br />
2 ICAR-Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, Hyderabad<br />
Sher-e-Kashmir University <strong>of</strong> Agricultural Sciences and Technology <strong>of</strong> Jammu, Jammu and Kashmir<br />
(UT) 181 133<br />
*brinder24@gmail.com<br />
Maize is globally the top-ranking cereal in potential grain productivity. It is cultivated in subtropical<br />
regions <strong>of</strong> the world. Maize (Zea Mays L.) is the third most important food grains<br />
crop in India after rice and wheat. In India maize produced 31.51 million tonnes in an area <strong>of</strong><br />
9.9 million hectares during 2020-21, (Acharya et al. 2021). In Jammu and Kashmir maizewheat<br />
is the most prevalent cropping sequence being practiced by farming community in the<br />
kandi belt <strong>of</strong> Jammu Division (under rainfed conditions). About 12% <strong>of</strong> the total area <strong>of</strong><br />
Jammu region constituting dry semi-hilly belt is rainfed in nature, the most stressed<br />
ecosystem <strong>of</strong> this region and is locally known as kandi area. Continues use <strong>of</strong> chemical<br />
fertilizers resulted in decline <strong>of</strong> soil physical and chemical properties and crop yield and<br />
significant land problems, such as soil degradation due to over exploitation <strong>of</strong> land and soil<br />
pollution caused by high application rates <strong>of</strong> fertilizers and pesticide application. Application<br />
<strong>of</strong> Effect <strong>of</strong> organic sources <strong>of</strong> nutrient on yield and soil properties <strong>of</strong> Soybeans besides<br />
supplying N, P and K also make unavailable sources <strong>of</strong> elemental nitrogen, bound<br />
phosphates, micronutrients, and decomposed plant residues into an available form to facilitate<br />
to plant to absorb the nutrients. Application <strong>of</strong> organic sources <strong>of</strong> nutrients viz FYM and<br />
Crop residue has capability to improve soil quality and higher crop productivity in<br />
sustainable manner without deteriorating the soil and other natural resources. Keeping the<br />
above facts into consideration, the problem entitled “Effect <strong>of</strong> organic and inorganic nutrient<br />
management practices on growth and yield <strong>of</strong> maize under sub-tropical kandi area Jammu<br />
region” is proposed to identify the best type <strong>of</strong> available organic resources which can be used<br />
as fertilizers and their best combination with appropriate proportion <strong>of</strong> inorganic fertilizers.<br />
Methodology<br />
A field experiment was conducted under rainfed condition during kharif season <strong>of</strong> 2019 -<br />
2020 at Research farm <strong>of</strong> Advanced Centre for Rainfed Agriculture Rakh-Dhiansar <strong>of</strong><br />
SKUAST-Jammu (32° 39” N 74° 53” E 332 m amsl), under rainfed condition. The soil <strong>of</strong><br />
experimental site was sandy loam in texture, with a pH 6.5, low in organic carbon (0.18), and<br />
607 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
available nitrogen (178 kg/ha), and medium available phosphorus (18 kg/ha) and potassium<br />
(108 kg/ha). The experiment consisted <strong>of</strong> ten treatments <strong>of</strong> inorganic and organic<br />
combinations <strong>of</strong> nutrient sources, viz T 1: Control; T 2: 100 % recommended fertilizer dose-<br />
RFD (60:40:20 NPK kg/ha); T3: 50 % RFD NPK; T4: 50 % N (crop residue); T5: 50 % N<br />
(FYM); T 6: 50 % RFD + 50 % N (crop residues); T 7: 50 % RFD + 50 % N (FYM); T 8: FYM<br />
10 t/ha; T9: 100 % RFD + ZnSO4 20 kg/ha and T10: Farmers practice (FYM 4 t/ha + urea 40<br />
kg/ha). Maize (var Mansar) was shown in the month <strong>of</strong> June- July and harvested in<br />
September-October during kharif seasons <strong>of</strong> 2019 to 2020, respectively. The crops were sown<br />
in lines with a spacing <strong>of</strong> 60 cm x 20 cm, respectively.<br />
Results<br />
Among the different organic and inorganic treatments, the maximum plant height (215 cm)<br />
was recorded with application <strong>of</strong> 50 % recommended NPK + 50% N (FYM) which was<br />
found to be statistically at par with the treatment where application <strong>of</strong> 50 % recommended<br />
NPK + 50% N (Crop residues) was applied during the experimentation. The improved growth<br />
in plant might be due to increased cell division and photosynthetc efficency because <strong>of</strong><br />
enhanced availabilty <strong>of</strong> nutrients. (Tomar et al., 2017). With regard to yield and yield<br />
attributes, the treatment where application <strong>of</strong> 50 % recommended NPK + 50% N (FYM) was<br />
applied recorded significantly highest grain (22.33 q ha -1 ) and stover (46.26 q ha -1 ) yield <strong>of</strong><br />
maize which was statistically at par with the treatment 50 % recommended NPK + 50% N<br />
(Crop residue) while the lowest yield was recorded in control plots. Likewise, the highest net<br />
returns to the tune <strong>of</strong> ₹ 24716 ha -1 was realized with the application <strong>of</strong> application <strong>of</strong> 50 %<br />
recommended NPK + 50% N (FYM) with B:C ratio <strong>of</strong> 2.01. Similar results were observed by<br />
Gupta,et.al( 2014). The increase in yield with addition <strong>of</strong> FYM alone or in combination <strong>of</strong><br />
inorganic fertilizers may be attributed to the fact that FYM being the store house <strong>of</strong> nutrients<br />
also made release <strong>of</strong> applied nutrients at its optimum at the same time improved the soil<br />
physical conditions (Kumar et al. 2002).<br />
Treatment<br />
Effect <strong>of</strong> organic and inorganic nutrients on growth yield and economics <strong>of</strong><br />
maize under rainfed conditions (pooled data <strong>of</strong> two years)<br />
Plant<br />
height<br />
(cm)<br />
Grain<br />
yield<br />
(q ha -1 )<br />
Straw<br />
yield<br />
(q ha -1 )<br />
Net<br />
returns<br />
(₹ ha -1 )<br />
Control 171 7.55 18.00 853 0.95<br />
100 % recommended NPK 195 17.29 36.68 16881 1.79<br />
50 % recommended NPK 184 12.09 26.56 7138 1.36<br />
50 % recommended N (Crop residue) 187 13.25 28.62 7859 1.37<br />
50 % recommended N (FYM) 187 14.04 29.97 8658 1.39<br />
50 % recommended NPK + 50% N (Crop 205 20.63 42.51 21496 1.90<br />
B.C<br />
Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture<br />
608 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
residue)<br />
50 % recommended NPK + 50% N<br />
(FYM) 215 22.33 46.26 24716 2.01<br />
FYM @ 10 t/ha 189 18.98 39.67 15986 1.62<br />
100 % recommended NPK + ZnSO 4 @<br />
20 kg/ha 200 19.53 40.47 21367 1.99<br />
Farmer’s method (FYM @ 4 t/ha + 40 kg<br />
Urea/ha) 194 15.39 33.23 12193 1.56<br />
Mean 193 16.11 34.19 8090 0.85<br />
CD=(P=0.05) 11.81 3.12 5.69<br />
Conclusion<br />
It can be safely concluded from the above observations that application <strong>of</strong> 50 %<br />
recommended NPK through chemical fertilizer in combination with application <strong>of</strong> 50% N<br />
through FYM resulted in higher plant height, yield and yield attributes <strong>of</strong> maize under<br />
subtropical conditions <strong>of</strong> Jammu.<br />
References<br />
Gupta V, Sharma A, Kumar J, Abrol V, Singh B and Singh M. 2014. Integrated nutrient<br />
management in maize-gobhi sarson cropping system in low altitude sub-tropical<br />
region in foothills. Bangladesh Journal <strong>of</strong> Botany. 43(2): 147-155.<br />
Kumar A, Thakur KS and Manuja S. 2002. Effect <strong>of</strong> fertilizer levels on promising hybrid<br />
maize (Zea mays) under rainfed conditions <strong>of</strong> HP. Indian Journal <strong>of</strong> Agronomy. 47:<br />
526-528.<br />
Tomar S. S, Singh A, Dwivedi A, Sharma R, Naresh R. K, Kumar, Tyagi, S, Singh A, Yadav<br />
S, Rahul N, and Singh, B. P. 2017. Effect <strong>of</strong> integrated nutrient management for<br />
sustainable production system <strong>of</strong> maize (Zea Maya L.) in Indo-Gangetic plain zone<br />
<strong>of</strong> India. International Journal <strong>of</strong> Chemical studies. 5(2): 310-316.<br />
Singh, R.B. 2000. Environmental consequences <strong>of</strong> agricultural development: a case study<br />
from the green revolution state <strong>of</strong> Haryana, India, Agric., Ecosystem and Envir. 82,<br />
1-3, pp. 97-103.<br />
Acharya N. G. Ranga. 2021 Agricultural University is a public agricultural university with its<br />
headquarters at the village Lam, Guntur district, Andhra Pradesh, India.<br />
Wikipediahttps://angrau.ac.in/downloads/AMIC/OutlookReports/2021/7-<br />
MAIZE_Jianuary%20to%20December%202021.pdf.<br />
609 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
T4a-21P<br />
Effect <strong>of</strong> Organic Sources <strong>of</strong> Nutrients on Yield and Soil Properties <strong>of</strong><br />
Soybean<br />
S. A. Jawale, P. H. Gourkhede, D. G. Shinde and A. K. Gore<br />
Organic Farming Research and Training Centre, Vasantrao Naik Marathwada Krishi Vidyapeeth,<br />
Parbhani - 431402 (Maharashtra) India<br />
<strong>of</strong>rtcvnmkvparbhani@gmail.com<br />
Organic manures are a valuable potential source <strong>of</strong> N and organic matter. They play an<br />
important role in the improvement <strong>of</strong> the physical, chemical, and biological properties <strong>of</strong> soil<br />
with an increase in the microbial population in the soil. Hence, a field study to know the<br />
effect <strong>of</strong> conjoint use <strong>of</strong> organic manure on yield and nutrient status <strong>of</strong> soybean in Inceptisol<br />
was conducted during kharif 2021-22, on the Research field <strong>of</strong> Organic Farming Research<br />
and Training Centre, Vasantrao Naik Marathwada Krishi Vidyapeeth, Parbhani. Revealed the<br />
effect <strong>of</strong> organic sources <strong>of</strong> nutrients on the yield and soil properties <strong>of</strong> soybeans. Among<br />
various treatments, the higher concentration <strong>of</strong> available nitrogen, phosphorous & potassium<br />
was found in RDF + FYM 5 t /ha (T 13) followed by 33% FYM + 33% VC + 33% NC (T 3) as<br />
an organic source <strong>of</strong> nutrients.<br />
Methodology<br />
An experiment was conducted at Organic Farming Research and Training Centre, Vasantrao<br />
Naik Marathwada Krishi Vidyapeeth Parbhani, during Kharif 2018-19. The experiment<br />
design was RBD for thirteen treatments with three replications with a gross plot size <strong>of</strong> 7.2 m<br />
x 6.0 m and net plot size <strong>of</strong> 6.3 m x 5.4 m and with 45 x 05 cm spacing.<br />
Results<br />
Soybean yield was determined by the development <strong>of</strong> the plant from the beginning <strong>of</strong><br />
sowing to the harvest period, where the role <strong>of</strong> fertilization was <strong>of</strong> great importance. The<br />
application <strong>of</strong> different organic and chemical fertilizers would affect one or all <strong>of</strong> its yield<br />
components. Data from Table showed that among nutrient source applications the chemical<br />
fertilizer as RDF with FYM the treatment T13 i.e. RDF + FYM @ 5 t ha -1 recorded the<br />
highest available macronutrient in soil which was found significantly superior over the rest<br />
<strong>of</strong> the treatments. However, the use <strong>of</strong> organic sources <strong>of</strong> nutrients affected soybean<br />
available macronutrients in soil, and data revealed that the effect <strong>of</strong> various organic sources<br />
on soybean yield was found to be significant. The nutrient status for available<br />
macronutrients was found to be significant for available nitrogen. Among various<br />
treatments higher concentration <strong>of</strong> available nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium was found<br />
in T3 followed by T2 <strong>of</strong> an organic source <strong>of</strong> the nutrient. The differences for pH, EC,<br />
Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture<br />
610 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
organic carbon, and CaCO3 were found to be non-significant. Whereas numerically higher<br />
values for pH were observed in T 10 and higher values <strong>of</strong> EC and organic carbon were<br />
observed in T 3. The differences in micronutrients were found to be significant. Among<br />
various treatments, T3 showed a higher concentration <strong>of</strong> all micronutrients. Among various<br />
organic sources <strong>of</strong> nutrients the treatment i.e. T 3: 100 % RDN through 33% FYM + 33%<br />
VC + 33% NC available macronutrient in soil N, P, and K . (218, 21.52 and 516 kg/ha). The<br />
treatments had RWUE <strong>of</strong> more than one except the control plots and it was found highest in<br />
treatment T 13 followed by T 2. The positive effects <strong>of</strong> organic manure application on the<br />
performance <strong>of</strong> soybean and other crops in black soils are well documented by Aher et al.<br />
2015. The differences for pH, EC, organic carbon, and CaCO 3 were found to be nonsignificant.<br />
Whereas numerically higher values for pH were observed in T10 and higher<br />
values <strong>of</strong> EC and organic carbon were observed in T 3.<br />
Conclusion<br />
Among various organic sources <strong>of</strong> nutrient treatments, application <strong>of</strong> 100 % RDN through<br />
33% FYM + 33% VC + 33% NC (T3) recorded the highest available nutrients in soil N, P,<br />
and K (218, 21.52 and 516 kg/ha). Potassium was found in RDF + FYM 5 t /ha (T 13) followed<br />
by 33% FYM + 33% VC + 33% NC (T3) as a organic source <strong>of</strong> nutrients.<br />
References<br />
Aher, S.B., Lakaria, B.L., Swami, K., Singh, A.B., Ramana, S., Ramesh, K. and Thakur, J. K.<br />
2015. Effect <strong>of</strong> organic farming practices on soil and performance <strong>of</strong> soybean<br />
(Glycine max (L.)) under semiarid tropical conditions in central India. Journal <strong>of</strong><br />
Applied and Natural Science 7(1): 67–71.<br />
611 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA,<br />
Hyderabad<br />
Treatments<br />
Soil nutrient status under different organic nutrient sources after harvest <strong>of</strong> Soybean<br />
pH<br />
EC<br />
dS m -1<br />
OC<br />
%<br />
CaCO 3<br />
%<br />
Available Major<br />
nutrients<br />
kg/ ha.<br />
Micronutrients<br />
ppm<br />
N P K Cu Fe Mn Zn<br />
T 1: 100 % RDN through FYM 7.59 0.42 0.61 3.5 197 20.19 486 12.09 14.29 17.58 0.26<br />
T 2: 100 % RDN through VC 7.61 0.29 0.64 3.6 206 21.48 486 12.43 15.61 18.26 0.46<br />
T 3: 100 % RDN through 33% FYM + 33% VC +<br />
33% NC<br />
7.59 0.46 0.68 2.8 218 21.52 506 12.68 16.84 20.06 0.45<br />
T 4: 100 % RDN: FYM + JA 3 at 30, 45 & 60 DAS 7.63 0.41 0.56 3.4 187 19.46 496 12.19 15.26 18.34 0.31<br />
T 5: 75 % RDN: FYM + JA 3 at 30, 45 & 60 DAS 7.49 0.43 0.62 2.6 164 17.26 486 8.56 13.64 17.54 0.39<br />
T 6: 50 % RDN: FYM + JA 3 at 30, 45 & 60 DAS 7.58 0.41 0.61 3.9 153 18.72 463 11.89 13.26 16.46 0.37<br />
T 7: 100 % RDN: FYM + Bi<strong>of</strong>ertilizer 2.5 lit/ha (SA) 7.64 0.34 0.48 3.5 163 18.63 416 12.67 14.27 17.58 0.36<br />
T 8: 75 % RDN: FYM + Bi<strong>of</strong>ertilizer 2.5 lit/ha (SA) 7.52 0.38 0.54 2.9 149 17.43 427 10.26 13.69 15.69 0.31<br />
T 9: 50 % RDN: FYM + Bi<strong>of</strong>ertilizer 2.5 lit/ha (SA) 7.48 0.39 0.51 3.7 138 16.59 416 11.31 11.67 16.87 0.38<br />
T 10: Jivamrut 3 Appln at 30, 45 & 60 DAS 8.12 0.41 0.61 3.4 114 15.67 421 10.94 11.43 15.64 0.28<br />
T 11: Jivamrut 5 Appln at 0, 15, 30, 45 & 60 DAS 7.83 0.39 0.53 3.6 116 15.27 406 10.54 11.58 14.69 0.33<br />
T 12: Control (Without any application) 7.64 0.41 0.54 3.1 94 13.28 389 9.38 10.64 15.87 0.34<br />
T 13: RDF + 5 t FYM/ha 7.59 0.38 0.58 3.5 234 22.68 529 12.67 13.69 16.98 0.29<br />
SE + 0.024 0.004 0.018 0.006 4.68 0.67 4.81 0.003 0.28 0.39 0.0048<br />
CD at 5% NS NS NS NS 1.56 0.223 1.603 0.002 0.093 0.12 0.113<br />
Mean 7.64 0.39 0.58 3.35 164 18.32 455 11.35 13.53 17.04 0.35<br />
ffff<br />
612 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
T4a-22P- 1460<br />
Effect <strong>of</strong> Paddy Straw mulching and Tillage on Growth and Yield <strong>of</strong> Pea<br />
(Pisum sativum L.)<br />
V. Akashe Zhimomi, Bendangjungla and Peiwang<br />
A field experiment was conducted during the rabi season 2021-22 at farmers field, NICRA<br />
village, Mon district, Nagaland to study the effect <strong>of</strong> paddy straw mulching and tillage on growth<br />
and yield <strong>of</strong> field pea (Pisum sativum L.). Aman, is a new pea variety introduced for the district<br />
and has become a staple crop. The crop is generally sown during the last week <strong>of</strong> October after<br />
the harvest <strong>of</strong> wet rice cultivation (WRC). The result showed that maximum plant height, no. <strong>of</strong><br />
branches per plant, no. <strong>of</strong> pods per plant, no. <strong>of</strong> seeds per pod, test weight and soil moisture<br />
content were obtained from paddy straw mulch with minimum tillage. The highest net income<br />
and benefit cost ratio was obtained from paddy straw mulch with minimum tillage.<br />
T4a-23P- 1102<br />
Effect <strong>of</strong> Tillage and Residue Management on Yield <strong>of</strong> Blackgram – Rabi<br />
Sorghum Sequence Grown on Inceptisol under Rainfed Condition<br />
N. J. Ranshur, S. K. Upadhye and V. M. Amrutsagar<br />
All India Coordinated Research Project on Dryland Agriculture, Solapur Maharashtra. 413 002<br />
An experiment was conducted at Dry Farming Research Station, Zonal Agricultural Research<br />
Station, Mulegaon farm Solapur during year 2020-21 to study the effect <strong>of</strong> tillage and residue<br />
management on yield <strong>of</strong> blackgram – rabi sorghum sequence grown on Inceptisol under rainfed<br />
condition. The main tillage management treatments were i) Conventional tillage (CT) ii)<br />
Reduced tillage (RT) and iii) Zero tillage (ZT) with different residue management sub treatments<br />
viz. S1= Kharif fallow (No retention <strong>of</strong> crop residue) + RDF (50 :25: 25 kg/ha N:P2O5:K2O) for<br />
rabi sorghum, S2 = Harvest <strong>of</strong> black gram above ground level at flowering stage for surface<br />
cover as a green lopping’s (root + crop residue)+ 0:50 Kg/ha N: P2O5 + PSB + Rhizobium seed<br />
treatment to black gram and 37.5:0:25 Kg/ha N : P2O5 : K2O + Acetobacter + PSB seed<br />
treatment for rabi sorghum and S3= Harvesting <strong>of</strong> black gram above ground level for grain<br />
(Root biomass retained in soil) + 19:37.5 Kg/ha N:P2O5 to black gram + PSB + Rhizobium seed<br />
treatment and 37.5:19:25 Kg/ha N:P2O5:K2O to rabi sorghum + PSB + Acetobacter seed<br />
treatment.<br />
613 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
At the end <strong>of</strong> 8 th year <strong>of</strong> experimentation, the observations were recorded for green biomass and<br />
dry matter yield <strong>of</strong> black gram at flowering for green manuring. The conventional tillage (CT)<br />
recorded highest mean green biomass yield (39.54 q ha -1 ) and dry matter yield (9.56 q ha -1 )<br />
followed by reduced tillage (38.13 and 7.85 q ha -1 ) and zero tillage (29.70 and 6.76 q ha -1 )<br />
treatments. The rabi sorghum recorded significantly highest grain (15.18 q ha -1 ) and stover<br />
(37.98 q ha -1 ) yields in reduced tillage main treatment (S2) followed by conventional tillage<br />
(15.08) and zero tillage (14.76). However, the treatment differences were non-significant. The<br />
highest returns, B:C ratio and relative water use efficiency (RWUE) were Rs. 60322/ha, 2.59 and<br />
4.12 kg ha -1 mm -1 respectively in rabi sorghum.<br />
In residue management sub-treatment, the grain (16.59 q/ha) and straw yield (41.04 q/ha) <strong>of</strong> rabi<br />
sorghum was recorded highest in black gram –green manuring (S2) treatments followed by kharif<br />
fallow (S1) and black gram grain (S3) treatment. The rabi sorghum recorded significantly highest<br />
net monetary returns, B:C ratio and relative water use efficiency (RWUE) Rs. 69385/ha, 2.83<br />
and 3.67 kg ha -1 mm -1 respectively in black gram –green manuring (S2) treatments followed by<br />
kharif fallow (S1) and black gram grain (S3) treatment.<br />
T4a-24P- 1338<br />
Effect <strong>of</strong> Tillage Practices and Mulching on Rabi Sorghum Crop under Rainfed Condition<br />
K. Arun Kumar*, T. Bagavata Priya, S. Isha Parveen, D. Lakshmi kalyani, R.<br />
Narasimhulu, Y. S. Sathish Kumar and H Manjunath<br />
Regional Agricultural Research Station, Acharya N. G. Ranga Agricultural University,<br />
Nandyal-518502<br />
*k. arunkumar@angrau.ac.in<br />
Soil water availability in water-limited ecosystems has been recognized as a key factor<br />
influencing plant production. The present situation in India demands conservation <strong>of</strong> every drop<br />
<strong>of</strong> water on land surface to increase biomass production to support livelihood. Suitable tillage<br />
practices that reduces cost <strong>of</strong> cultivation; increases income, reduces hazardous effects and<br />
increases water use efficiency <strong>of</strong> sorghum need to be adopted for conservation <strong>of</strong> rainwater, top<br />
fertile soil and nutrients that stabilizes and/or improves the food production in the region. At<br />
present conditions, both primary and secondary tillage operations are being carried-out which not<br />
only increases cost <strong>of</strong> cultivation but also induces soil and water losses. By avoiding these<br />
problems, rotary strip tillage has been introduced which gave the best crop residue management<br />
by decomposing the leftover crop residues in the field and turn in increase the organic matter<br />
content which intern increases water holding capacity <strong>of</strong> the soil.<br />
614 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Methodology<br />
The experiment was conducted during the Rabi season <strong>of</strong> 2020-2021 and 2021-2022 at Regional<br />
Agricultural Research Station. This centre is located Scarce Rainfall zone at 15.47 N latitude and<br />
78.48 E longitude. The experiment was conducted in an area <strong>of</strong> 90 m 2 plot size with 45 cm × 15<br />
cm spacing and fertilizer application <strong>of</strong> 80-60-40 NPK kg/ha. The treatments consisted <strong>of</strong> three<br />
horizontal practices, T1 : Conventional tillage (primary, secondary and tertiary tillage as per<br />
existing farmers/ researchers practice and sowing by seed cum ferti-drill), T2 : Zero tillage<br />
(Sowing by seed cum-ferti-drill / cultivator; glyphosate spray to kill existing vegetation after<br />
sowing), T3 : Minimum (Reduced) tillage (Basal fertilizer dose application followed by Disking<br />
and sowing by seed drill after running cultivator that incorporates basal fertilizers) and two<br />
vertical practices (residue mulch and without residue mulch). Strip plot design was selected by<br />
using OPISTAT S<strong>of</strong>tware and NTJ 5 variety was selected for the experiment with three-year<br />
duration (Tesfahunegn, 2012). The following parameters like panicle weight, panicle length,<br />
1000 seed weight, grain and straw yield & harvest index were recorded.<br />
Results<br />
Tillage practices, mulch practices and their interaction had significant influence on yield<br />
parameters <strong>of</strong> sorghum like panicle weight, panicle length, grain yield, straw yield and harvest<br />
index. The interaction between tillage and mulch practices was non-significant. Yield attributes<br />
and yields <strong>of</strong> rabi sorghum as influenced by tillage and mulch as shown in Table 1. The highest<br />
pooled grain yield and straw yield was obtained at zero tillage and lowest pooled grain yield and<br />
straw yield at conventional tillage because <strong>of</strong> zero tillage was attributed to improvement in yield<br />
components namely, number <strong>of</strong> panicle weight and 1000 grain weight. In addition to mulching<br />
practices, the highest pooled grain yield and straw yield (3692 kg/ha) (6810 kg/ha) was obtained<br />
at zero tillage system compare to other tillage, because <strong>of</strong> mulching practices reduces the<br />
evaporation <strong>of</strong> water and increases the water holding capacity which results in higher yields.<br />
Although, harvest index was not affected by mulch rate, tillage system and their interaction (X.<br />
Wang and Dai, 2012)] also obtained highest harvest index value on the zero-tillage system.<br />
Conclusion<br />
The effect <strong>of</strong> different tillage practices and with mulch & without mulch on sorghum crop was<br />
conducted at Regional Agricultural Research Station, Nandyal. The results were observed with<br />
highest grain and straw yield was obtained at zero tillage system compare to conventional and<br />
minimum tillage system. The highest harvest index was observed in zero tillage system compare<br />
to other.<br />
615 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
References<br />
Gebreyesus Brhane Tesfahunegn, 2012, Effect <strong>of</strong> Tillage and Fertilizer Practices on Sorghum<br />
Production in Abergelle Area, Northern Ethiopia. 4(2):52-69.<br />
X. Wang, H. Wu, K. Dai., 2012, Tillage and crop residue effects on rainfed wheat and maize<br />
production in northern China. Field Crops Research, 132:106–116.<br />
Yield attributes and yields <strong>of</strong> rabi sorghum as influenced by tillage and mulch<br />
Treatments<br />
Panicle<br />
weight (g)<br />
Horizontal factor: Tillage practices - 3<br />
Panicle<br />
length<br />
(cm)<br />
1000 seed<br />
weight (g)<br />
Pooled<br />
Grain<br />
yield<br />
(kg/ha)<br />
Straw yield<br />
(kg/ha)<br />
Harvest<br />
index (%)<br />
T1 : Conventional tillage 87.5 19.4 35.6 3326 6218 36.96<br />
T2 : Zero tillage 98.7 22.9 36.8 3724 6857 37.38<br />
T3 : Minimum tillage 97.9 21.8 36.3 3607 6616 37.26<br />
SEm+ 1.18 0.36 0.18 37 73 0.45<br />
CD (P=0.05) 4.17 1.25 0.62 130 259 NS<br />
CV (%) 3.9 4.2 2.6 10 10 6.7<br />
Vertical factor: Mulch practices – 2<br />
M1 : No residue mulch 91.9 20.7 35.1 3412 6317 37.08<br />
M2 : Residue mulch 97.6 22.0 37.3 3692 6810 37.32<br />
SEm+ 0.68 0.39 0.22 27 44 0.27<br />
CD (P=0.05) 2.2 1.28 0.71 83 143 NS<br />
CV (%) 5.2 2.1 3.8 8.8 8.7 5.1<br />
Interaction (Mulch x Tillage)<br />
SEm+ 1.67 0.50 0.25 52 104 0.64<br />
CD (P=0.05) NS NS NS NS NS NS<br />
Interaction (Tillage x Mulch)<br />
SEm+ 1.44 0.60 0.32 48 91 0.56<br />
CD (P=0.05) NS NS NS NS NS NS<br />
616 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
T4a-25P-1014<br />
Effect <strong>of</strong> Tillage Practices and Mulching Operations on Productivity <strong>of</strong> Maize<br />
Under Dryland Conditions<br />
Pramod Kumar, Mintu Job, N. Kumari, Abhishek Patel and D.N. Singh<br />
Birsa Agricultural University, Ranchi, Jharkhand (India)<br />
Dryland agriculture is mainly dependent on rainfall, especially in India, there are different kinds<br />
<strong>of</strong> tillage operations such as conventional tillage, no-tillage, reduced tillage etc. Conventional<br />
tillage practices and crop residue removal will lead to a decrease in soil organic matter due to<br />
accelerated decomposition and loss <strong>of</strong> topsoil, thereby adversely affecting soil properties.<br />
Recently, reduced tillage practices have been gaining popularity.<br />
Conservation tillage<br />
techniques, which are soil-surface crop residue management systems with minimum or notillage,<br />
are crucial in efficiently saving more precipitation for crop production. Among the<br />
management practices for increasing water use efficiency (WUE) one <strong>of</strong> them is mulching. Any<br />
material spread on the surface <strong>of</strong> soil to protect it from rain drop, solar radiation or evaporation is<br />
called mulch.<br />
Maize in India contributes nearly 9 % in the national food basket. In addition to staple food for<br />
human beings and quality feed for animals, maize serves as a basic raw material as an ingredient<br />
to many industrial products that include starch, oil, protein, alcoholic beverages, food<br />
sweeteners, pharmaceutical, cosmetic, film, textile, gum, package and paper industries etc.The<br />
crop is cultivated throughout the year in all states <strong>of</strong> the country for various purposes including<br />
grain, fodder, green cobs, sweet corn, baby corn, pop corn in peri-urban areas.<br />
Methodology<br />
A field experiment was conducted at the research farm <strong>of</strong> Zonal Research Station, Chianki<br />
situated at 23 0 N and 84.2 0 E under jurisdiction <strong>of</strong> Birsa Agricultural University (Ranchi),<br />
Jharkhand, India during 2017 and 2020. The soil <strong>of</strong> the experimental field was sandy loam in<br />
texture with pH 6.7. The soil <strong>of</strong> the experimental site was medium in organic carbon (0.53 %),<br />
available nitrogen (128 kg ha -1 ), phosphorus (70 kg ha -1 ) and low in available potassium (45 kg<br />
ha -1 ). There was total <strong>of</strong> twelve treatments comprisingConventional Tillage + Without Mulch,<br />
Conventional Tillage + Farm waste Mulch, Conventional Tillage + Polythene Mulch,<br />
Conventional Tillage + Soil Mulch, Minimum Tillage + Without Mulch, Minimum Tillage+<br />
Farm waste Mulch, Minimum Tillage+ Polythene Mulch, Minimum Tillage+ Soil Mulch, Raised<br />
Bed Sowing + Without Mulch, Raised Bed Sowing + Farm waste Mulch, Raised Bed Sowing +<br />
Polythene Mulch and Raised Bed Sowing + Soil Mulch. The experiment was laid out in a<br />
617 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
randomized block design with three replications. All the recommended packages and practices<br />
were followed to grow crops.<br />
Marketable produce <strong>of</strong> crop in terms <strong>of</strong> per hectare and their saleable value was worked out. The<br />
economics was calculated by considering the actual expenditure incurred on various operations,<br />
prevalent labour charges and current price <strong>of</strong> inputs and value <strong>of</strong> produce in the market. The net<br />
returns were computed taking into account market prices.<br />
Results<br />
The maximum value <strong>of</strong> plant height (219.6 cm) observed in case <strong>of</strong> Raised Bed Sowing + Soil<br />
Mulch, while minimum plant height (169.4 cm) was recorded with Minimum Tillage + Without<br />
Mulch. Maximum cob length (25.59 cm) was observed in case <strong>of</strong> Raised Bed Sowing + olythene<br />
Mulch, while minimum cob length (16.98 cm) was recorded Minimum Tillage + Without Mulch.<br />
Test weight (1000-grain weight <strong>of</strong> 295.75 g was observed in case <strong>of</strong> Conventional Tillage +<br />
Polythene Mulch, while maximum yield (4825 kg/ha) was recorded Raised Bed Sowing +<br />
Polythene Mulchwhile minimum yield (3025 kg/ha) was recorded Minimum Tillage + Without<br />
Mulch and rain water use efficiency was (6.209 kg/ha/mm).Out <strong>of</strong> different treatment<br />
combinations the treatment combination the Raised Bed sowing with Polythene gave significant<br />
higher gain yield 4825 (kg/ha) and also higher rain water use efficiency (6.21 kg/ ha/mm)<br />
whereas net B:C ratio (2.13) was found higher in case <strong>of</strong> Raised Bed Sowing with Farm waste<br />
Mulch. The treatment containing Raised Bed Sowing with Polythene Mulch gave 96% weed<br />
control whereas Conventional Tillage Without Mulch gave result equal to one complete<br />
weeding.<br />
Conclusion<br />
A comparison <strong>of</strong> different tillage treatments showed that Raised Bed sowing with Polythene<br />
gave significant higher gain yield (4825 kg/ha) and also higher rain water use efficiency (6.21<br />
kg/ ha/mm) whereas net B:C ratio (2.13) was found higher in case <strong>of</strong> Raised Bed Sowing with<br />
Farm waste Mulch.<br />
References<br />
Gan, Y., Siddique, K. H. M., Turner, N. C., Li, X. G., Niu, J. Y., Yang, C. 2013. Ridge-furrow<br />
mulching systems—an innovative technique for boosting crop productivity in semiarid<br />
rain-fed environments. Adv. Agron. 118: 429–476. 10.1016/b978-0-12-405942-<br />
9.00007-4<br />
618 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Yin, W., Guo, Y., Hu, F., Fan, Z., Feng, F., Zhao, C. 2018a. Wheat-Maize intercropping with<br />
reduced tillage and straw retention: a step towards enhancing economic and<br />
environmental benefits in arid areas. Front. Plant Sci. 9:1328.<br />
10.3389/fpls.2018.01328<br />
Zhang, X., Zhao, J., Yang, L., Kamran, M., Xue. X., Dong, Z. 2019. Ridge-furrow mulching<br />
system regulates diurnal temperature amplitude and wetting-drying alternation<br />
behavior in soil to promote maize growth and water use in a semiarid region. Field<br />
Crops Res. 233: 121–130. 10.1016/j.fcr.2019.01.009<br />
Yin, W., Chai, Q., Guo, Y., Fan, Z. L., Hu, F. L., Fan, H. 2020. Straw and plastic management<br />
regulate air-soil temperature amplitude and wetting-drying alternation in soil to<br />
promote intercrop productivity in arid regions. Field Crops Res. 249:107758.<br />
10.1016/j.fcr.2020.107758<br />
T4a-26P-1059<br />
Effect <strong>of</strong> Tillage Practices and Nitrogen Fertilizer Levels on Soil Total<br />
Carbon, Bulk Density and Porosity in Rainfed Maize-Pigeonpea Crop<br />
Rotation under Semi-Arid Tropical Climate<br />
A. K. Indoria, K. Sammi Reddy, G. Pratibha, V. K. Singh, S. Kundu, S. S. Balloli, S.<br />
Suvana, K. Srinivas, K. L. Sharma and H. Sahu*<br />
ICAR-Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, Hyderabad, India<br />
*Hemant.Sahu@icar.gov.in<br />
Conventional tillage (CT) increases the soil erosion and degradation processes, which causes<br />
significant losses in soil carbon content and ultimately promote the deterioration <strong>of</strong> different soil<br />
properties (Indoria et al., 2017). It has been reported that if appropriate soil management<br />
technologies such as conservation agriculture is adopted in rainfed areas for the improvement <strong>of</strong><br />
soil organic content and associated soil physical properties especially bulk density and porosity,<br />
the productivity <strong>of</strong> rainfed crops can be significantly improved (Indoria et al., 2017). At the same<br />
time, adequate supply <strong>of</strong> the mineral nitrogen could be one <strong>of</strong> the soil management practices in<br />
semi-arid tropical climate for improvement <strong>of</strong> soil environment. Crop response to mineral N<br />
involves increase in CO2 fixation and more above and below ground root biomass production.S<br />
oil bulk density can affect the seedling emergence, root growth and thus crop production (Blanco<br />
Canqui and Ruis, 2018). It can also influence the soil porosity. Therefore, this study was aimed<br />
to assess the impact <strong>of</strong> different tillage practices and Nfertilizer levels on soil total carbon, bulk<br />
density and porosity in different soil depths in maize-pigeonpea crop rotation under semi-arid<br />
tropical climate.<br />
619 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Methodology<br />
The experimental site was located at Gungal Research Farm (GRF) <strong>of</strong> ICAR-Central Research<br />
Institute for Dryland Agriculture, Hyderabad, Telangana, India. The duration <strong>of</strong> the experiment<br />
was 2012-2018.The treatments comprised <strong>of</strong> the three tillage practicesviz., conventional tillage<br />
(CT), reduced tillage (RT) and conservation agriculture (CA), and four nitrogen levels viz., N0=<br />
no nitrogen application (control), N75= 75% <strong>of</strong> RDN (recommended dose <strong>of</strong> nitrogen),<br />
N100=100% <strong>of</strong> RDN and N125=125% <strong>of</strong> RDN <strong>of</strong> maize and pigeonpea crops on yearly rotation<br />
basis. The soil totalcarbon was determined by using the CHNS Analyzer, Vario EL, bulk density<br />
was measured by core methodand porosity was calculated by using the formula: Total porosity<br />
(%) = (1-bulk density/particle density).<br />
Results<br />
Effect on soil total carbon content<br />
From the view point <strong>of</strong> soil total carbon content, the order <strong>of</strong> soil depth was as follows: 0-<br />
7.5>7.5-15>15-30>30-45 cm., irrespective <strong>of</strong> tillage and nitrogen levels. There were 28.1, 20.1,<br />
15.6 and 2.5% increase in the soil total carbon contentin CA, and 13.9, 9.9, 7.7 and 0.8%<br />
increase in soil total carbon contentin RT, in 0-7.5, 7.5-15, 15-30 and 30-45 cm, respectively as<br />
compared to the CT. The nitrogen fertilizer levels in relation to the total soil carbon content<br />
follow the order: N125>N100>N75>N0 in all the depths studied. There were 13.5, 18.7 and 23.7%<br />
increase in soil total carbon contentin 0-7.5cm soil depth,9.4, 16.1 and 20.6% increase insoil total<br />
carbon content in 7.5-15 cm, 6.0, 12.7 and 17.4% increase in soil total carbon content in 15-30<br />
cm soil depth and 0.8, 3.0 and 6.4% increase insoil total carbon content in 30-45 cm soil in N75,<br />
N100 and N125, respectively.<br />
Effect on soil bulk density and soil total porosity<br />
620 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Both tillage and nitrogen treatments had significant effect on bulk density and total porosity <strong>of</strong><br />
the soil at different depths. Among the tillage treatments, significantly lower mean soil bulk<br />
density was recorded in CA followed by RT and CT in 0-7.5, 7.5-15 and 15-30 soil depth,<br />
respectively. The lower mean soil bulk density by 7.2, 7.1 and 4.2% was recorded in N125 as<br />
compared to N0 at 0-7.5, 7.5-15 and 15-30 cm soil depth, respectively. An opposite relationship<br />
was observed between bulk density and soil total porosity. Significantly higher soil total porosity<br />
was observed in NT followed by RT and CT in different depths studies. The higher soil total<br />
porosity was observed in N125 at 0-7.5, 7.5-15, 15-30 and 30-45 cm soil depth as compared to the<br />
previous N fertilizer levels. The significant increase was to the extent <strong>of</strong> 10.9, 11.1, 7.2 and 6.0%<br />
at 0-7.5, 7.5-15, 15-30 and 30-45 in N125 as compared to the N0. The overall results were close<br />
conformity with the earlier findings by Blanco Canqui and Ruis, 2018 and Indoria et al., 2017.<br />
Conclusion<br />
The order <strong>of</strong> performance <strong>of</strong> tillage practices in improving the soil total carbon, bulk density and<br />
soil total porosity was: CA>RT> CT. While, the order <strong>of</strong> performance <strong>of</strong> N fertilizer levels in<br />
improving soil total carbon, bulk density and porosity was: N125>N100>N75>N0. The interactive<br />
effects <strong>of</strong> CA+N125 were found superiorin improving these soil properties as compared to other<br />
treatment combinations.<br />
References<br />
Blanco-Canqui, H. and Ruis, S. J. 2018. No-tillage and soil physical environment. Geoderma.<br />
326: 164-200.<br />
Indoria, A. K., Srinivasarao, Ch., Sharma, K.L. and Sammi Reddy, K. 2017. Conservation<br />
agriculture–a panacea to improve soil physical health. Current Science.112: 52-61.<br />
T4a-27P -1091<br />
Effect <strong>of</strong> Various Organic Sources <strong>of</strong> Nutrients on Growth and Yield <strong>of</strong><br />
Tomato<br />
S. V. Uphade, A. K. Gore and D. P. Waskar<br />
Organic Farming Research and Training Centre, Vasantrao Naik Marathwada Krishi Vidyapeeth,<br />
Parbhani, Maharashtra 431401(India).<br />
*<strong>of</strong>rtcvnmkvparbhani@gmail.com<br />
Organic farming is gaining importance in recent past due to want <strong>of</strong> residue free food and soil<br />
health improvement. In context <strong>of</strong> this there is increasing demand for organic vegetables from<br />
621 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
consumers particularly in metro and big cities. Among vegetable crops tomato (Lycopersicon<br />
esculantum L.) is important crop grown throughout the year which gives high yield within a<br />
relatively short period and it is economically attractive. In India tomato occupied 76 thousand ha<br />
with a production 18.39 Mt. In Maharashtra, tomato is a highly demanded vegetable in addition<br />
to it being a rainfed crop in kharif season. Using organic fertilizers especially in composted form<br />
had positive effect on soil health and fertility, which consequents increased yield in long term<br />
(Mehdizadeh,2013), increased cation exchange capacity <strong>of</strong> soil and increase availability <strong>of</strong> some<br />
nutrients such Ca, Mg, and P (Abou-Hussein et al.,2002). In this context an experiment was<br />
conducted to study the effect <strong>of</strong> various organic sources <strong>of</strong> nutrients on growth and yield <strong>of</strong><br />
tomato and the economics <strong>of</strong> various treatments.<br />
Methodology<br />
An experiment was conducted at Organic Farming Research and Training centre, Vasantrao Naik<br />
Marathwada Krishi Vidyapeeth Parbhani, during kharif 2018-2019. Eleven treatments with three<br />
replications were tested in RBD design. The tomato transplants were cultivated in the plot area <strong>of</strong><br />
6.0 x 5.4 m as gross and 4.2 m x 4.8 m as net plot. The variety PKM -1 was transplanted on 12 th<br />
July, 2018 with recommended management practices as per various treatments.<br />
Results<br />
The data on tomato yield, monetary returns, B:C ratio as influenced by different treatments is<br />
presented in table.<br />
Tomato crop yield, Gross Monetary Returns (GMR), Net Monetary Returns (NMR), B : C<br />
Treatments<br />
ratio as influenced by different treatments.(2018 – 19).<br />
Tomato Yield (t/ha)<br />
GMR<br />
(₹/ha)<br />
NMR<br />
(₹/ha)<br />
B:C ratio<br />
T 1: RDN 100 % through FYM 24.8 200213 122480 2.56<br />
T 2: RDN 100 % through Vermi<br />
Compost (VC)<br />
T 3: RDN 50% through FYM +<br />
RDN 50 % through VC<br />
T 4: RDN 50% through FYM +<br />
Neem cake @ 400 Kg/ha<br />
T 5: RDN 100 %: FYM + JA 3<br />
app (FA & SA) @ 20 days<br />
interval<br />
26.1 209626 145440 2.71<br />
25.9 204613 126766 2.66<br />
23.4 182826 119703 2.45<br />
25.5 200293 126765 2.58<br />
622 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
T 6: RDN 75 %: FYM +JA 3 app<br />
(FA & SA) @ 20 days interval.<br />
T 7: RDN 50 %: FYM +<br />
Jivamrut 3 app (FA & SA)<br />
@ 20 days interval.<br />
T 8: Jivamrut 3 app (FA & SA)<br />
@ 20 days interval<br />
T 9: FYM @ 5tn/ha + High Nitro 611<br />
kg/ha + Rock Phosphate 107 kg/ha<br />
+ Neem cake @ 400kg/ha.<br />
24.4 197173 120813 2.53<br />
24.3 195333 120083 2.49<br />
22.7 182640 119323 2.40<br />
26.6 209840 145441 2.74<br />
T 10: RDF 100% + FYM @ 5tn/ha 33.8 257920 183200 3.45<br />
T 11: Control. 20.3 163520 102160 2.30<br />
SE + 1.63 664.2 325.5 -<br />
CD at 5% 4.89 1986.2 973.8 -<br />
Mean 25.3 200363 130197 2.62<br />
The effect <strong>of</strong> various organic sources on tomato yield was found to be significant. The<br />
treatment T10 i.e. RDF + FYM 5 t /ha recorded the highest tomato yield (33.8 t/ha) which was<br />
found significantly superior over rest <strong>of</strong> the treatments. The lowest tomato yieldwas recorded in<br />
T11 (20.3 t/ha) i.e. control. The highest GMR was obtained with the application <strong>of</strong> RDF + FYM 5<br />
t/ha (T10) (₹ 257920/ha) which was significantly superior over rest <strong>of</strong> the treatments. Similar<br />
trend was observed in case <strong>of</strong> NMR. Whereas, application <strong>of</strong> RDF + FYM 5 t /ha recorded<br />
highest B:C ratio (3.45) followed by treatment T9 (2.74) i.e. RDF + FYM 5 t /ha + Phosphorich<br />
@ 157 kg/ha + Neem cake @ 400 kg /ha. Among the organic treatments, application <strong>of</strong> RDN<br />
100% through Vermicompost (T2) recorded highest tomato yield (26.1t/ha), highest GMR<br />
(Rs.209626 /ha) and highest NMR (Rs. 148440/ ha) over rest <strong>of</strong> the treatments. Similar results<br />
were reported by (Shankar et al. 2012) that organically grown tomato has found to be<br />
significantly influenced the nutrient content compared to tomato grown through conventional <strong>of</strong><br />
fertilizer application<br />
Conclusion<br />
The results revealed that the application <strong>of</strong> RDF + 5 t FYM/ha produced significantly higher<br />
tomato yield (33.8 t/ha), highest GMR (₹257920 /ha) and highest NMR (₹183200/ha). However,<br />
among organic treatments application <strong>of</strong> RDN 100 % through vermicompost (T2) recorded<br />
highest tomato yield (26.1 t/ha), highest GMR (₹ 209626 /ha) and highest NMR (₹145440/ha).<br />
623 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
References<br />
Abou-Hussein, S.D., I.EL-Oksh., T.EI-Shorbagy and EI-Bahiry, U.A. 2002. Effect <strong>of</strong> chicken<br />
manure, compost and bi<strong>of</strong>irtilizers on vegetative growth, tuber characteristics and yield<br />
<strong>of</strong> potato crop. Egypt.J.hort. 29(1)135-149.<br />
Mehdizadeh, M., Darbandi, E.I., Naseri-Rad H. and Tobeh, A. 2013. Growth and yield <strong>of</strong> tomato<br />
(Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) as influenced by different organic fertilizers.<br />
International Journal <strong>of</strong> Agronomy and plant production.4 (4):734-738.<br />
Shankar, K.S; Sumathi. S., Shankar. M. and Reddy. N.N., 2012. comparison <strong>of</strong> nutritional<br />
quality <strong>of</strong> organically versus conversionary grown tomato. J. Hort. 69, 90.1: 86-90.<br />
T4a-28P-1207<br />
Energy Efficient Tillage and Nutrient Management for Rabi Sorghum on<br />
Inceptisol<br />
S. K. Upadhye, V. M. Amrutsagar, N. B. More, G. Ravindra Chary, Archana B. Pawar, S.<br />
V. Khadtare, Shubhangi Kadam and R. V. Sanglikar<br />
All India Coordinated Research Project for Dryland Agriculture, Main Center, Solapur- 413 002<br />
Mahatma Phule Krishi Vidyapeeth, Rahuri, Maharashtra, India,<br />
zarssolapur@gmail.com<br />
Sorghum is the most important cereal crop <strong>of</strong> Scarcity zone <strong>of</strong> Maharashtra. The area <strong>of</strong> sorghum<br />
in Maharashtra is about 19.35 lakh hectare with a production <strong>of</strong> 31.62 lakh tones and<br />
productivity <strong>of</strong> 912 kg ha -1 . Productivity <strong>of</strong> sorghum is decreasing continuously due to use <strong>of</strong><br />
imbalanced chemical fertilizers accompanied by restricted use <strong>of</strong> organic manures as well as may<br />
be due to intensive cultivation <strong>of</strong> sorghum under medium deep black soils. Vertisols are selfpulverized<br />
soils and hence need not require special tillage operations for inverting the soil.<br />
Looking to the changing scenario, the cost <strong>of</strong> cultivation should be reduced at minimum level<br />
with resource conservation. However, majority <strong>of</strong> the farmers do not perform tillage operations<br />
every year and sometimes leaves the field fallow during Kharif and cultivate sorghum in Rabi in<br />
medium deep to deep soils. Therefore, an attempt was made to find out low-cost tillage and<br />
nutrient management practices, to study the effect <strong>of</strong> tillage and nutrient management practices<br />
on soil quality, to minimize dependence on chemical fertilizers and to find out energy saving in<br />
sustainable rabi sorghum production system under dryland condition.<br />
624 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Methodology<br />
The field experiment on rRabi sorghum (cultivar M 35-1) under dryland conditions was laid out<br />
conducted at AICRP for Dryland Agriculture Research Station, Mulegaon Farm, Solapur during<br />
2005-06 to 2016-17 for twelve years. The experiment was laid out in split plot design containing<br />
nine treatment combinations replicated three times includes three main plot treatments viz: 1)<br />
Low tillage (LT) - sowing with seed drill and light harrowing after sowing – (SSLH) 2)<br />
Medium tillage (MT) - one harrowing + SSLH+ one hoeing 3) Conventional tillage (CT) -<br />
plough once in 3 year + one harrowing + ridges and furrows + one harrowing + SSDH + three<br />
hoeings and three sub-treatments viz: 1) Organics - 50 kg Nha -1 (50 % CR+50 % LL) CR–Crop<br />
residue, LL–Leucaena loppings - N1 2) Organics + chemical fertilizers - 25 kg N ha -1 through<br />
urea + 25 kg N ha -1 through organics (50 % CR + 50 % LL) - N2 3) Fertilizers (RDF) : 50 kg<br />
N + 25 Kg P2O5 ha -1 - N3.<br />
The average nitrogen content <strong>of</strong> crop residue and leucaena during 12 years are 0.48 % and 3.04<br />
% respectively. The N, P and K were applied through urea, single super phosphate and muriate<br />
<strong>of</strong> potash respectively. The data on crop yield, total N uptake, economics, moisture use<br />
efficiency (MUE) <strong>of</strong> grain were recorded at harvest <strong>of</strong> sorghum. After harvest <strong>of</strong> crop, soil<br />
samples were collected (0-15 cm) and analyzed for organic carbon (wet oxidation method),<br />
available N (0.32 % alkaline KMnO4oxidizable), available P (0.5 M NaHCO3 extractable, pH<br />
8.5,) and K (Neutral normal ammonium acetate extractable) following the procedures described<br />
by Page et al. (1982).<br />
The input energy (MJ ha −1 ) and output energy was/ were computed for each treatment and<br />
expressed in terms <strong>of</strong> MJ ha −1 as suggested by Mittal et al. (1985). The energy use efficiency<br />
(EUE) derived as a ratio <strong>of</strong> output and input energy for each treatment (Sankar et al., 2013).<br />
Results<br />
In the tillage and nutrient management practices, the maximum input energy was observed in<br />
CTN1 (63924 MJ ha -1 ) whereas the minimum input energy was observed in treatment LTN3<br />
(4391MJ ha -1 ) followed by treatment MTN3 (4945 MJ ha -1 ). The maximum output energy was<br />
observed in MTN2 (70389 MJ ha -1 ) followed by CTN2 (68308 MJ ha -1 ). The maximum energy<br />
use efficiency was observed in LTN3 (13.865) followed by MTN3 (13.323).<br />
In case <strong>of</strong> nutrient management, the maximum energy use efficiency was observed in N 3 (11.919)<br />
followed by N 2 (1.966). Also, it is observed that, minimum energy <strong>of</strong> 48.22 MJ was required for<br />
production <strong>of</strong> one kg grain where nutrition <strong>of</strong> 50% organic and 50% inorganic N recorded highest<br />
625 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
grain (17.06 qha -1 ) and stover yield (40.84 qha -1 ) also (Table 1) as seen in the findings <strong>of</strong> Maruti<br />
Shankar et al. (2013<br />
The conventional tillage recorded significantly higher grain (16.62 q ha -1 ) and stover yield (40.46 q<br />
ha -1 ). However, it was on par with medium tillage (16.06 and 39.64 q ha -1 respectively). The moisture<br />
use efficiency (MUE) was maximum in conventional tillage (7.42 kg ha -1 mm -1 ). (Table). The N<br />
application 50 % through organic + 50 % through chemical fertilizer (N 2) recorded higher MUE<br />
(7.79 kg ha -1 mm -1 ).<br />
Conclusion<br />
One harrowing + sowing with seed drill and light harrowing + one hoeing at 3 rd week and 25 kg N<br />
through inorganic fertilizer (Urea) and 25 kg N through organic manure (12.5 kg N through crop<br />
residue (byre waste) + 12.5 kg N through Leucaena lopping or any green loppings) + 12.5 kg P 2O 5<br />
through fertilizer (SSP) is recommended for rRabi sorghum grown on medium deep black soils in<br />
scarcity zone <strong>of</strong> Maharashtra for getting higher grain and stover yield and monetary returns with<br />
saving <strong>of</strong> energy use and maintaining soil fertility.<br />
Effect <strong>of</strong> tillage system and source <strong>of</strong> nutrition on energy use efficiency and energy<br />
productivity <strong>of</strong> rabi sorghum (Mean)<br />
Treatments<br />
Total Input<br />
Energy<br />
(MJ ha -1 )<br />
Total<br />
output Energy<br />
(MJha -1 )<br />
Energy Use<br />
Efficiency<br />
Energy required for<br />
production <strong>of</strong> per kg grain,<br />
MJ<br />
LTN1 60744 48526 0.802 49.49<br />
LTN2 32548 60713 1.871 48.63<br />
LTN3 4391 60739 13.865 48.31<br />
MTN1 61336 55146 0.903 48.62<br />
MTN2 33140 70389 2.127 48.14<br />
MTN3 4945 65880 13.323 47.89<br />
CTN1 63924 55277 0.861 49.13<br />
CTN2 35728 68308 1.899 48.29<br />
CTN3 7532 65017 8.568 48.00<br />
Effect <strong>of</strong> tillage system and source <strong>of</strong> nutrition on yield <strong>of</strong> rabi sorghum (pooled mean)<br />
Tillage<br />
Nutrient<br />
N 1 (Organic N<br />
100 %)<br />
Grain (q ha -1 ) Stover (q ha -1 )<br />
LT MT CT<br />
Pooled<br />
Mean<br />
LT MT CT<br />
Pooled<br />
mean<br />
13.27 17.22 16.51 15.67 33.37 41.51 41.88 38.92<br />
626 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
N 2 (Organic N<br />
50% +Ferti N<br />
50%)<br />
N 3 (fertilizer N<br />
100 %)<br />
15.687 19.95 18.46 18.03 38.36 47.35 45.78 43.83<br />
16.71 20.47 19.22 18.80 42.79 46.88 45.65 45.11<br />
Mean 15.22 19.21 18.07 38.17 45.25 44.44<br />
Tillage Nutrient<br />
Tillage Nutrient<br />
T X N<br />
(T) (N)<br />
(T) (N)<br />
T X N<br />
SE+ 0.55 0.32 0.65 1.16 1.09 1.89<br />
CD at 5% 1.17 0.65 NS 2.46 2.20 NS<br />
References<br />
Maruti Sankar, G. R., Sharma, K. L., Srinivas Reddy, Singh, K., Rathi B. S., Mishra, A., Brhera,<br />
B. D., Subudhi, C. R., Singh Bhagwan, Singh, H. G., Ashok Kumar Singh, Rusthsa, D. K.,<br />
Yadawa M. S., Thyagaranj C. R., Mishra P. K., Suma Chandrika, M. and Venkateshwarlu,<br />
A. 2013. Efficient tillage and nutrient management practices for sustainable yields,<br />
pr<strong>of</strong>itability and energy use efficiency for rice-based cropping system in different soils and<br />
agro-climatic conditions. Expl Agric., 49 (2): 161–178 Cambridge University Press 2013<br />
doi:10.1017/S0014479712001330<br />
Page, A. L., Miller, R. H., and Keeney, D. R. 1982. Methods <strong>of</strong> soil analysis part 2. Chemical<br />
and microbiological properties 2 nd ed., Madison (WI), ASA and SSSA.<br />
Panse, V. G., and Sukhatme, P. V., 1967. Stastistical methods for Agricultural Worker 2 nd<br />
edition ICAR, New Delhi.<br />
Mittal, V. K, Mittal, J. P., Dhawan, K. C.1985. Research Digest on Energy Requirement in<br />
Agriculture, Sector, Coordinating cell, AICRP on energy requirement in Agriculture<br />
sector. Punjab Agriculture, University Ludhiana.<br />
627 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
T4a-29P-1540<br />
Enhancing the Productivity <strong>of</strong> Rainfed Maize Through Different Planting<br />
Methods and Moisture Conservation Practices in The Shivalik Foothill Region<br />
<strong>of</strong> Punjab<br />
Mandeep Kaur* and Anil Khokhar<br />
Punjab Agricultural University-Regional Research Station, AICRPDA Centre Ballowal Saunkhri,<br />
Balachaur, Punjab 144521- India<br />
*mkabc121@gmail.com<br />
Maize (Zea mays L.) is one <strong>of</strong> the most important cereal crops in the world, after rice and wheat.<br />
It is called the “queen <strong>of</strong> cereals” due to its higher productivity and diverse uses. Maize is a<br />
major Kharif season crop in the northeastern part <strong>of</strong> the state, known as the Kandi region which<br />
has an area <strong>of</strong> 0.393 million hectares. In this region, only 25% area has assured irrigation and in<br />
the remaining area, it is grown as rainfed or with limited irrigation. Erratic rainfall, prolonged<br />
dry spell, late-onset, and early cessation <strong>of</strong> rain are the major determinant in maize production<br />
during kharif season. Maize is sensitive to both water logging and moisture stress. Moisture<br />
shortage due to prolonged dry spells lead the crop to stressed conditions which affect mineral<br />
nutrition, ion uptake and it also alters crop physiological and biochemical behaviour. Thus, some<br />
cultural practices are required to protect the crop from prolonged dry spells and excess rainfall.<br />
The sowing method is an important factor responsible for soil moisture storage, judicious use <strong>of</strong><br />
water, good crop stands and so the crop growth. Planting methods are the most effective<br />
agronomic practices to reduce surface run<strong>of</strong>f and conserve the moisture in the crop root zone<br />
which can be used during moisture stress. In additionally, to planting methods, some other<br />
cultural practices such as moisture conservation techniques (mulching and earthing up) can help<br />
to cultivate this crop under challenging environments. Earthing up in maize at knee-high stage<br />
reduces competition from weeds and act as soil mulch after drying to conserve soil moisture by<br />
reducing evaporation. This may promote better establishment <strong>of</strong> crop and delay the surface<br />
drying which results in higher yields. Mulching is also an effective measure to conserve water<br />
and nutrient resources.<br />
Methodology<br />
The field experiment was conducted during Kharif season 2020 using PMH-1 cultivar in split<br />
plot design with four planting methods (flat planting, ridge planting, bed planting, and<br />
conservation furrow planting) as main plots and three moisture conservation practices (no<br />
intercultural, straw mulch @ 6 t ha -1 and earthing up) as subplot treatments at Ballowal Saunkhri.<br />
628 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Combinations <strong>of</strong> 12 treatments were replicated thrice resulting in total <strong>of</strong> 36 experimental plots.<br />
In the case <strong>of</strong> the flat planting method, spacing between the rows and plant-to-plant was kept at<br />
60 cm and 20 cm, respectively. A similar procedure was followed in the conservation furrow<br />
method except that after planting 4 rows, every 5 th -row plantation was skipped and plant-to-plant<br />
spacing was kept at 18 cm. In ridge planting, seeds were placed 6-7 cm above the base on the<br />
side <strong>of</strong> ridges spaced 60 cm apart with a 20 cm distance between the plants. In the bed planting<br />
method, one row <strong>of</strong> maize was sown on top in the center <strong>of</strong> raised beds 67.5 cm wide having a<br />
top flat <strong>of</strong> 37.5 cm and a furrow 30 cm with plant-to-plant spacing <strong>of</strong> 18 cm. The crop was<br />
harvested last week <strong>of</strong> September 2020.<br />
Results<br />
Among planting methods, bed planting method produced a maximum grain yield <strong>of</strong> 33.8 qha -1<br />
(Table 1). Bed planting gave a 20.7 percent higher yield followed by ridge sowing which<br />
produced a 12.7 percent higher grain yield at Ballowal Saunkhri as compared to flat sowing.<br />
Higher grain yield (33.5 qha -1 ) was obtained under earthing up and it was statistically better than<br />
under straw mulch and no interculture. Earthing up significantly increased the grain yield by 27.5<br />
percent over no interculture and 7.2 percent over straw mulch treatment. The highest stover yield<br />
was observed under bed sowing (72.6 q ha -1 ) which was significantly higher over the flat sowing<br />
(60.9 q ha -1 ) method. The bed planting method resulted in a maximum net return (31657 Rs) and<br />
B: C ratio (1.84) per hectare than other planting methods. Among moisture conservation<br />
practices, earthing up produced the highest net returns (30865 Rs) and B: C ratio (1.79). The<br />
higher net returns <strong>of</strong> 10475 Rs per hectare were obtained with earthing up moisture conservation<br />
practices as compared to no interculture.<br />
Effect <strong>of</strong> planting methods and moisture conservation practices on grain yield, stover yield,<br />
Treatments<br />
Planting method<br />
and economics <strong>of</strong> rainfed maize at Ballowal Saunkhri.<br />
Grain<br />
(q ha -1 )<br />
Yield<br />
Stover<br />
(q ha -1 )<br />
Net returns<br />
(Rs ha -1 )<br />
Economics<br />
B: C ratio<br />
Flat planting 26.8 60.9 20338 1.56<br />
Ridge planting 30.7 70.7 27094 1.75<br />
Bed planting 33.8 72.6 31657 1.84<br />
Conservation furrow<br />
planting<br />
27.1 66.7 21217 1.58<br />
CD (p=0.05) 2.95 7.24 - -<br />
629 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Moisture conservation practices<br />
No interculture 24.3 60.0 20390 1.66<br />
Straw mulch @ 6<br />
tha -1<br />
31.1 69.0 23975 1.59<br />
Earthing up 33.5 74.2 30865 1.79<br />
CD (p=0.05) 2.18 3.82 - -<br />
Rainfall (mm)<br />
Conclusion<br />
554.2 mm<br />
In conclusion, the bed planting method with earthing at knee high stage proved beneficial in<br />
increasing the productivity <strong>of</strong> rainfed maize under a challenging environment in the Shivalik<br />
foothill region <strong>of</strong> Punjab.<br />
T4a-30P-1578<br />
Escaping Moisture Stress in Steep Slopes by Altering the Time <strong>of</strong> Planting<br />
(Early Sowing) in Garden Pea<br />
N. Ajitkumar Singh*, Solei Luiram, K. Vikramjeet, N. Sureshchandra Singh,<br />
Yirmila.V. Zimik and P.A. Ramsem<br />
Krishi Vigyan Kendra Ukhrul, ICAR Research Complex for NEH Region, Manipur Centre<br />
*ajitsinghkvk@gmail.com, vkukhrul@gmail.com<br />
Garden pea (Pisum sativum L.) is one <strong>of</strong> the leading horticultural crops <strong>of</strong> Ukhrul district<br />
Manipur and is generally grown in October-November. Planting sites are generally located on<br />
steep hill slopes with an altitude ranging from 1,300 to 1,800 m above mean sea level. The major<br />
growers within the district are under the Sub division <strong>of</strong> Ukhrul and Chingai block. In recent<br />
years there has been a rapid decline in the production and productivity in this district including<br />
the adopted NICRA villages due to terminal drought and frost. Being, not economically feasible<br />
to go for irrigation throughout the season in such terrine, this investigation “altering the planting<br />
time” (early sown) was taken up. For this intervention, the NICRA village Ramva and<br />
Lungshang were selected, after analysing the rainfall pattern since 2013 and started<br />
demonstration from the year 2018. Soil samples were collected for moisture and other chemical<br />
analysis from demonstrating plots and farmers’ fields. The data reveal that moisture content was<br />
significantly high (30.2-36.5%) in the early sown demonstrated plot (August) as compared to<br />
farmers’ field (19.3-25.4%) late sown (October). Economically early sown gives the maximum<br />
yield <strong>of</strong> 28.3-30.8 q/ha as compared to late sawn (18.4-21.6 q/ha), and return per rupee<br />
investment is 3.2 and 1.8 respectively. From this study, it can be concluded that moisture stress<br />
630 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
in terminal period can be controlled and manage without investing on high-cost irrigation inputs<br />
but simply by utilising the residual moisture timely couple with other short or mid duration<br />
kharif rice varieties which may give farmer ample time for this demonstration.<br />
T4a-31P-1317<br />
Growth and Growth Parameters <strong>of</strong> Soybean influenced by different Land<br />
Configurations and Crop Residue Management Practices<br />
S. S. Kinge 1* , G. A. Bhalerao 2 , A. J. Rathod 1 , M. N. Wairagde 2 and J. D. Kalambe 1<br />
1<br />
Department <strong>of</strong> Agronomy, VNMKV Parbhani, India. 431402<br />
2<br />
Department <strong>of</strong> Agronomy, College <strong>of</strong> Agriculture Nagpur, 440012.<br />
* sunilkinge40@gmail.com<br />
Land configurations have a major influence on soil aeration, moisture availability, and<br />
temperature <strong>of</strong> soil which in turn affect the yield and quality <strong>of</strong> the crop. The broad bed furrow<br />
and ridge and furrow are newly developed methods <strong>of</strong> soybean cultivation in India. Therefore,<br />
need for standardized land configuration for the cultivation <strong>of</strong> soybean in India. Among different<br />
conservation measures, Crop residue practices on the soil surface to reduce the evaporation rate<br />
and discourage weeds is another water conservation practice in India. To conserve as much<br />
rainwater as possible during fewer rainfall years and ways <strong>of</strong> overcoming excess moisture. The<br />
combination <strong>of</strong> land configuration and crop residue practices conserves soil moisture and<br />
improves water use efficiency and grain yield. Hence field experiment entitled “Studies on Land<br />
Configuration and Crop Residue Management on Soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merrill)” was<br />
conducted at the Department <strong>of</strong> Agronomy, Vasantrao Naik Marathwada Krishi Vidyapeeth,<br />
Parbhani during Kharif 2019 to study the effect <strong>of</strong> land configuration and residue management<br />
practices on growth and yield <strong>of</strong> soybean.<br />
Methodology<br />
The experiment was carried out in split plot design with three replications consisting <strong>of</strong> fifteen<br />
treatment combinations. The land configuration practices consisted <strong>of</strong> Flatbed (L1), Broad bed<br />
furrow (L2), Ridges & furrow (L3) and five treatments on crop residue management practices <strong>of</strong><br />
Crop Residue @1.25T ha -1 +5 kg ha -1 decomposing microorganism (CR1), Crop Residue@ 1.25<br />
T ha -1 +10 kg ha -1 decomposing microorganism (CR2), Crop Residue @ 2.5 T ha -1 + 5 kg ha -1<br />
decomposing microorganism (CR3), Crop Residue @ 2.5 T ha -1 + 10 kg ha -1 decomposing<br />
microorganism (CR4) and without crop residue control (CR5).<br />
631 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Results<br />
Among the land configuration treatments broad bed furrow recorded higher growth and yield<br />
attributing character. In Land configurations method L2 (broad bed furrow) recorded<br />
significantly higher values for plant height, functional leaves plant -1 , leaf area plant -1 , number <strong>of</strong><br />
branches plant -1 and total dry matter plant -1 than L1 (flatbed) and found at par with L3 (ridges &<br />
furrow) in soybean. The increase in seed yield kg ha -1 was attributed to increased growth<br />
parameters and yield attributes <strong>of</strong> soybean. This result correlates with the work <strong>of</strong> Karande<br />
(2006) and Rudrawar (2007).<br />
Among the crop residue management practices, the application <strong>of</strong> Crop Residue @ 2.5 T ha -1 +<br />
10 kg ha -1 decomposing microorganisms recorded higher growth characters and yield attributes.<br />
Application <strong>of</strong> Crop Residue @ 2.5 T /ha + 10 kg ha -1 decomposing microorganism (CR4)<br />
produced higher values for plant height, functional leaves plant -1 , leaf area plant -1 , number <strong>of</strong><br />
branches plant -1 and total dry matter plant -1 than rest <strong>of</strong> the treatments and found at par with the<br />
application <strong>of</strong> Crop Residue @ 2.5 T ha -1 + 5 kg ha -1 decomposing microorganism (CR3). The<br />
increase in seed yield kg ha -1 was attributed to increased growth parameters and yield attributes<br />
<strong>of</strong> soybean. These results correlate with the work <strong>of</strong> Shelar and Khandekar (2013) and Jadhav et<br />
al. (2017). The interaction effect <strong>of</strong> land configurations and crop residue management practices<br />
in growth and growth parameters was found to be non-significant.<br />
Treatment<br />
Growth and yield attributing character as influenced by different treatments<br />
Land configuration (L)<br />
Plant<br />
height<br />
(cm)<br />
Dry<br />
matter<br />
plant -1<br />
(g)<br />
Functional<br />
leaves plant -<br />
1<br />
Number<br />
<strong>of</strong><br />
branches<br />
plant -1<br />
L1-Flat bed 39.59 9.46 8.18 3.63 3.98<br />
L2-Broad bed furrow 47.39 13.42 10.93 4.81 5.56<br />
L3-Ridges & furrow 45.79 12.41 10.24 4.54 4.93<br />
S.E. ± 0.81 0.75 0.39 0.18 0.17<br />
C.D. at 5% 3.17 2.93 1.53 0.70 0.68<br />
Residue management (CR)<br />
CR 1 - Crop Residue @ 1.25 T ha -1 + 5 kg ha -<br />
1<br />
decomposing microorganism<br />
41.14 10.73 8.85 4.07 4.64<br />
Leaf<br />
area<br />
plant -1<br />
(dm 2 )<br />
CR 2 - Crop residue @ 1.25 T ha -1 + 10 kg ha -<br />
1<br />
decomposing microorganism<br />
42.67 10.92 9.05 4.15 4.85<br />
632 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
CR 3 - Crop Residue @ 2. 5 T ha -1 + 5 kg ha -1<br />
decomposing microorganism<br />
CR 4 - Crop residue @ 2.5 T ha -1 + 10 kg ha -1<br />
decomposing microorganism<br />
48.18 12.96 10.82 4.64 5.46<br />
49.18 13.61 11.74 4.77 5.77<br />
CR 5 - Without crop residue 40.94 10.59 8.45 4.00 3.42<br />
S.E. ± 1.40 0.54 0.35 0.15 0.16<br />
C.D. at 5% 4.07 1.58 1.01 0.45 0.45<br />
Interaction (L × CR)<br />
S.E. ± 2.42 0.94 0.60 0.27 0.27<br />
C.D. at 5% NS NS NS NS NS<br />
G. M 47.31 14.76 9.78 4.33 4.83<br />
Conclusion<br />
Among the land configuration treatments broad bed furrow recorded higher growth attributing<br />
characters Plant height, number <strong>of</strong> functional leaves plant-1, leaf area plant-1, total dry matter<br />
accumulation plant-1, number <strong>of</strong> branches plant-1 than ridges furrow and flat Bed. Among the<br />
crop residue management practices, the application <strong>of</strong> Crop Residue @ 2.5 T/ha + 10 kg ha-1<br />
decomposing microorganism recorded higher growth attributes Plant height, number <strong>of</strong><br />
functional leaves plant-1, leaf area plant-1, total dry matter accumulation plant-1, number <strong>of</strong><br />
branches plant-1 over rest <strong>of</strong> the treatments.<br />
References<br />
Jadhav, M. B., Kumbhar, M., Patel, M. V., and Shitap, M. S. 2017. Effect <strong>of</strong> land configuration<br />
and mulches on growth, yield and economics <strong>of</strong> summer groundnut. Trends in<br />
Biosciences, 10(27), 0974-8431, 5798<br />
Karande, S. V., Khot, R. B., and Hankare, R. H. 2006. Effect <strong>of</strong> layout and nutrient integration<br />
on yield and nutrient uptake <strong>of</strong> chickpea. J. Maharashtra Agric. Univ. 31(3), 370.<br />
Rudrawar, P. P. 2007 Studies on in situ moisture conservation and nutrient management in<br />
soybean (Doctoral dissertation, Vasantrao Naik Marathwada Krishi Vidyapeeth,<br />
Parbhani).<br />
Shelar, D. N. and Khandekar, B. S. 2013. Performance <strong>of</strong> moisture conservation practices on<br />
growth and yield <strong>of</strong> soybean (Glycine max. L.). Asian J. Soil Sci. 8(2), 283-285.<br />
633 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
T4a-32P-1314<br />
Impact <strong>of</strong> Application <strong>of</strong> Organics, Bi<strong>of</strong>ertilizers on Soil Nutrient status and<br />
Quality parameter <strong>of</strong> Rabi Sorghum<br />
Kuruva Mounika 1* , A. Lalitha Kumari 2 , Ch. Sujani Rao 2 , M. Luther 2 , Sumanta Kundu 1<br />
and K. Sammi Reddy 1<br />
1 ICAR- Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, Hyderabad-500059.<br />
2 Acharya N.G. Ranga Agriculture University, Andhra Pradesh<br />
*kuruvamounika1998@gmail.com<br />
In India, the area under the sorghum crop is 5.62 m ha, production is 4.57 m t, and productivity is<br />
812 kg ha -1 . The imbalanced fertilizer use, and low organic carbon are attributed to the causes <strong>of</strong><br />
low system productivity and poor soil health. Integrated and balanced use <strong>of</strong> nutrients through<br />
chemical and organic sources and bi<strong>of</strong>ertilizers is a prerequisite to sustaining soil health and<br />
producing maximum yield. Objectives <strong>of</strong> investigation to study the effect <strong>of</strong> organic manures<br />
and bi<strong>of</strong>ertilizers on soil nutrient status and protein content <strong>of</strong> rabi sorghum.<br />
Methodology<br />
A field experiment entitled was conducted at Agricultural College Farm, Bapatla in the rabi<br />
season <strong>of</strong> 2020-21. Eight treatments in combinations consisting <strong>of</strong> three levels <strong>of</strong> fertilizers with<br />
FYM, vermicompost, neem cake along with bi<strong>of</strong>ertilizers were tried in randomized block design.<br />
Available nitrogen content in the soil was determined by the alkaline potassium permanganate<br />
method. Available phosphorus in the soil samples was determined by Olsens method. Available<br />
potassium in the soil was extracted using neutral normal ammonium acetate method. The total<br />
nitrogen in grains was estimated by micro Kjeldahl method.<br />
Results<br />
The available nitrogen was significantly higher in the treatment T4 (100% RDF + Neem cake @<br />
500 kg ha -1 + Azospirillum @ 5 kg ha -1 + PSB @ 5 kg ha -1 ) at blooming (390 kg ha -1 ), harvest<br />
stage (372 kg ha -1 ) and it was on par with T2 (100% RDF + FYM @ 10 t ha -1 + Azospirillum @ 5<br />
kg ha -1 + PSB @ 5 kg ha -1 (381 and 368 kg ha -1 ) respectively depicted in the table. The high<br />
available nitrogen status at both stages in treatments integrated with other components might be<br />
ascribed to the fixation <strong>of</strong> nitrogen by Azospirillum and an additional supply <strong>of</strong> nitrogen through<br />
FYM compared to sole inorganic treatments. Significantly higher soil available phosphorus<br />
(68.68 and 66.33 kg ha -1 ) and available potassium (434 and 415 kg ha -1 ) were observed in the<br />
634 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
treatment T2 (100% RDF + FYM @ 10 t ha -1 + Azospirillum @ 5 kg ha -1 + PSB @ 5 kg ha -1 ) at<br />
blooming and harvest stage, respectively and it was on par with 125% RDF (available P - 67.00,<br />
65.67 kg ha -1 and available K -432 and 412 kg ha -1 ) depicted in table 1. It enhances the P<br />
concentration in solution through the mineralization <strong>of</strong> organic P and solubilization <strong>of</strong> native soil<br />
P compounds by producing organic acids (Roy et al., 2017). Significantly higher protein content<br />
(12.29%) was recorded in the treatment T2 (100 % RDF + FYM @ 10 t ha -1 + Azospirillum @ 5<br />
kg ha -1 + PSB @ 5 kg ha -1 ) as shown in the figure.<br />
Effect <strong>of</strong> organic manures and bi<strong>of</strong>ertilizers on available nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium<br />
Treatments<br />
(kg ha -1 ) in soil<br />
Nitrogen Phosphorus Potassium<br />
Blooming Harvest Blooming Harvest Blooming Harvest<br />
T 1 : 100% RDF 346 328 57.99 55.67 390 373<br />
T 2 : 100% RDF+FYM @ 10 t ha -<br />
1 + Azospirillum + PSB<br />
T 3 : 100% RDF + Vermicompost<br />
@ 3 t ha -1 + Azospirillum +<br />
PSB<br />
T 4 : 100% RDF+ Neem cake @<br />
500 kg ha -1 + Azospirillum<br />
+PSB<br />
381 368 68.68 66.33 434 415<br />
370 349 64.16 63.33 429 409<br />
390 372 61.06 59.74 414 401<br />
T 5 : 125% RDF 379 361 67.00 65.67 432 412<br />
T 6 : 75% RDF+FYM @ 10 t ha -1<br />
+ Azospirillum + PSB<br />
T 7 : 75% RDF+ Vermicompost<br />
@ 3 t ha -1 + Azospirillum +<br />
PSB<br />
T 8 : 75% RDF+ Neem cake @<br />
500 kg ha -1 + Azospirillum +<br />
PSB<br />
336 324 56.90 53.04 389 376<br />
326 319 53.42 51.89 383 370<br />
338 326 52.90 51.10 375 367<br />
SEm± 14.3 13.5 2.98 2.67 14.23 13.63<br />
CD (0.05%) 43.2 40.5 8.94 8.01 42.69 40.89<br />
635 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Conclusion<br />
Effect <strong>of</strong> organic manures and bi<strong>of</strong>ertilizers on protein content (%) <strong>of</strong> sorghum grain<br />
Integrated use <strong>of</strong> inorganics and organics (FYM) along with bi<strong>of</strong>ertilizers not only increased<br />
yield but also improved soil health by increasing organic carbon, available nutrient contents and<br />
soil biological activity.<br />
Reference<br />
Roy MD, Sarkar GK, Das I, Karmakar R and Saha, T. 2017. Integrated use <strong>of</strong> inorganic,<br />
biological, and organic manures on rice productivity, nitrogen uptake, and soil health in<br />
Gangetic alluvial soils <strong>of</strong> West Bengal. J. Indian Soc. Soil Sci. 65 (1): 72-79.<br />
T4a-33P -1276<br />
Impact <strong>of</strong> Zinc and Iron-Enriched Organic Manures on Rabi Grain Sorghum<br />
T. Bhagavatha Priya, Sk. Sameera, S. Isha Parveen and S. Balaji Nayak<br />
Acharya N.G. Ranga Agricultural University, Lam, Guntur, Andhra Pradesh, India<br />
Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench) is India's second most important millet crop after pearl<br />
millet both in terms <strong>of</strong> area and production. On account <strong>of</strong> severe grain mold menace in rainy i.e.<br />
Kharif season (Das et al., 2020), sorghum cultivation has shifted to Rabi season rainfed crop<br />
(also as an irrigated crop to some extent in rice fallows or after other arable Kharif legume crops)<br />
and has 64.36% share in 4.77 m t <strong>of</strong> total production during 2019-20 (DES, 2021). An estimated<br />
48 and 12% <strong>of</strong> Indian soils are reported to be deficient in Zn and Fe i.e. a DTPA extractable Zn<br />
636 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
and Fe content < 0.60 and 4.50 ppm being critical limit (Singh et al., 2009). These soil nutrient<br />
deficiencies are getting manifested in not only poor crop yields but also in their consumers. An<br />
estimated 17.3% and 43% <strong>of</strong> children under 5 years <strong>of</strong> age & 38% <strong>of</strong> pregnant women as<br />
reflected in low haemoglobin concentration i.e. anaemia are at risk <strong>of</strong> Zn and Fe deficiency due<br />
to dietary inadequacy. In this context, bio-fortification (increasing the minerals/vitamins in<br />
edible plant parts by genetic means) <strong>of</strong> staple crops has been explored as a sustainable strategy<br />
under the HarvestPlus scheme globally. Besides genetic approaches, agronomic efforts also help<br />
in the bi<strong>of</strong>ortification <strong>of</strong> staple crops. Studies were made to assess the impact the <strong>of</strong> use <strong>of</strong><br />
organic manures (FYM and vermicompost), enriched iron, and zinc sulfate fertilization on Rabi<br />
grain sorghum productivity, pr<strong>of</strong>itability and bi<strong>of</strong>ortification.<br />
Methodology<br />
Field experiments were conducted during the Rabi seasons <strong>of</strong> 2017, 2018 & 2019 at the All India<br />
Coordinated Sorghum Improvement Project (AICSIP) centre in Nandyal, Andhra Pradesh.<br />
Eleven treatments formed by the combination <strong>of</strong> two organic manures (FYM and Vermi-<br />
Compost, VC) @ 50 kg/ha enriched with four levels <strong>of</strong> ZnSO4 and FeSO4 (3.75, 7.50, 11.25, and<br />
15.00 kg/ha each) for a period <strong>of</strong> 15 days prior to soil application along with three checks i.e.<br />
control (no manure & no fertilizer), recommended dose <strong>of</strong> fertilizers (RDF, 80-40 kg/ha N-P2O5)<br />
and RDF + 15 kg ZnSO4/ha soil application + seed treatment with Azospirillum (0.5 kg) and<br />
Trichoderma (0.03 kg) were evaluated in RBD with three replications. Experimental soil was a<br />
deep vertisol rated as low for organic carbon (0.42%), DTPA extractable zinc and iron (0.52 and<br />
4.2 ppm) and has 201-49-342 kg/ha <strong>of</strong> available N-P-K. Fertilizer application was applied as<br />
basal with enriched manures applied as broadcasting. Rainfed sorghum cultivar ‘CSV29R’ was<br />
sown in 45 cm rows with a plant-to-plant spacing <strong>of</strong> 15 cm. Rainfall <strong>of</strong> 184.7, 82.6, and 99.0 mm<br />
was received during the 2017, 2018, and 2019 crop life cycle respectively. The sorghum crop<br />
was raised following a package <strong>of</strong> practices recommended for the rabi season crop. Data on<br />
growth, yield attributes, and yields were recorded, and economics were worked out using MSP<br />
<strong>of</strong> grain and assumed price <strong>of</strong> stover and market price <strong>of</strong> inputs and analyzed statistically. As<br />
data has a similar trend, results based on pooled analysis were presented.<br />
Results<br />
Growth, Yield attributes, and yield<br />
Plant height, a measure <strong>of</strong> crop growth was significantly improved due to 11.25 kg/ha zinc and<br />
iron sulfate each enriched manure (FYM and VC) application along with RDF over RDF. Pooled<br />
data reveals a significant improvement in Rabi sorghum grain and stover yields (19.64 and<br />
637 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
3.17%) due to the application <strong>of</strong> RDF + 15 kg ZnSO4 to soil and seed treatment with<br />
Azospirillum (0.5 kg) and Trichoderma (0.03 kg) as compared to unfertilized and un-manured<br />
control (2.75 t/ha). A significant improvement in grain yield <strong>of</strong> rabi sorghum (16.7%) was<br />
obtained with 15 kg/ha zinc and iron sulfate each enriched FYM fertilization over RDF (3.12<br />
t/ha). Similar but slightly higher (18.9%) improvements in grain yield were obtained with a 25%<br />
lower level <strong>of</strong> zinc and iron sulfate (11.25 kg/ha) with the use <strong>of</strong> vermicompost as a manure<br />
source for micronutrient enrichment. However, both the FYM and VC-enriched Zn and Fe<br />
treatments remained at par with RDF + 15 kg ZnSO4 + seed treatment for grain yield.<br />
Azospirillum seed treatment associated with symbiotic atmospheric N fixation has made it<br />
available to crop directly. Further, application <strong>of</strong> 15 kg/ha ZnSO4 along with bi<strong>of</strong>ertilizers on<br />
account <strong>of</strong> its enhanced supplies <strong>of</strong> Zn and S in the soil might have improved their crop uptake<br />
from a soil low in DTPA extractable Zn and thus together have boosted the crop performance<br />
over RDF alone and thus has markedly better performance than control. In manure-enriched Zn<br />
and Fe treatment, Fe supplies in soil are improved in addition to Zn & S and thus rabi sorghum<br />
crop performance is boosted in a DTPA extractable zinc and iron deficit soil. Superiority <strong>of</strong><br />
manure enriched zinc and iron fertilizers for rabi sorghum crop reported in this study were<br />
corroborated by the findings <strong>of</strong> Durgude et al. (2019) from Rahuri who found better rabi<br />
sorghum yields with use <strong>of</strong> cow dung slurry (500 L/ha) incubated 20 kg/ha ZnSO4 along with<br />
RDF (80:40:40 kg/ha N:P2O5:K2O) as compared to RDF. The current superiority reported with<br />
use <strong>of</strong> FYM enriched zinc and iron sulphate @ 15 kg/ha each was however, four times higher<br />
than those reported by Kumar and Kubsad (2017).<br />
Economics<br />
Economics indicate that FYM enriched ZnSO4 + FeSO4 application @ 11.25 kg each or VC<br />
enriched ZnSO4 + FeSO4 application @ 7.5 kg each being at par with each other have recorded<br />
significantly higher net income than control (Rs. 39969/ha) as described in the table. VC<br />
enriched ZnSO4 + FeSO4 application @ 11.25 kg each has further significantly improved net<br />
income over RDF alone. The increases in net income could be ascribed to the cumulative effect<br />
<strong>of</strong> increase in grain and stover yields over control and RDF. Similar impacts <strong>of</strong> enriched Zn and<br />
Fe fertilizers on economics were reported by Kumar and Kubsad (2017).<br />
Zn and Fe Bi<strong>of</strong>ortification <strong>of</strong> sorghum grain<br />
Low iron and zinc status <strong>of</strong> soil is manifested in their low concentration in grain (Table 2) that<br />
was the lowest in unfertilized control (26.9 & 13.3 ppm) and RDF (28.1 & 17.5 ppm). FYM<br />
enriched ZnSO4 + FeSO4 fertilization up to 11.25 kg/ha has significantly improved the Fe and Zn<br />
concentration in grain, however, with VC, no such dose dependent differences in Fe<br />
638 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
concentration <strong>of</strong> grain were observed. Irrespective <strong>of</strong> manure used for enrichment, 15 kg ZnSO4<br />
+ FeSO4 dose recorded the highest Fe and Zn concentration in sorghum grain.<br />
Conclusion<br />
From the three-year (2017-19) investigation on rabi sorghum, it was concluded that soil<br />
application <strong>of</strong> RDF i.e. recommended dose <strong>of</strong> fertilizers (80-40 kg/ha N-P2O5) along with 15<br />
kg/ha ZnSO4 to seed treated with Azospirillum (500 g) + Trichoderma (30 g) is promising over<br />
no fertilizers. FYM or VC (both @ 50 kg/ha) enriched with 11.25 or 7.5 kg/ha <strong>of</strong> ZnSO4 +<br />
FeSO4 each was promising for realizing higher rabi sorghum grain yields and Zn and Fe bio<br />
fortified grains and net pr<strong>of</strong>its in Nandyal agro-ecoregion <strong>of</strong> Andhra Pradesh.<br />
References<br />
Das, I.K., Aruna, C. and Tonapi, V. A. 2020. Sorghum grain mold. ICAR-Indian Institute <strong>of</strong><br />
Millets Research, Hyderabad, India, ISBN: 81-89335-93-6: 86.<br />
DES (Directorate <strong>of</strong> Economics and Statistics). 2021. Third Advance Estimates <strong>of</strong> Production <strong>of</strong><br />
Food grains for 2020-21, as on 25 th May, 2021. Ministry <strong>of</strong> Agriculture and Farmers<br />
Welfare Department <strong>of</strong> Agriculture, Cooperation and Farmers Welfare Directorate <strong>of</strong><br />
Economics and Statistics. pp. 1-2.<br />
Kumar, A and Kubsad, V.S. 2017. Effect <strong>of</strong> fortification <strong>of</strong> organics with iron and zinc on<br />
growth yield and economics <strong>of</strong> rabi sorghum. J. Farm Sci., 30 (4): 547-549.<br />
Singh, A.K., Sarkar, A.K., Kumar, A and Singh B.P. 2009. Effect <strong>of</strong> l use <strong>of</strong> mineral fertilizers,<br />
lime, and farm yard manure on the crop yield, available plant nutrients, and heavy metal<br />
status in acidic loam soil. J. Indian Soc. Soil Sci. 12(11): 133-149.<br />
Growth, yield attributes, yield and economics <strong>of</strong> rabi sorghum as influenced using iron and<br />
zinc-enriched organic manures (pooled over 3 years)<br />
TREATMENT<br />
Plant<br />
height<br />
(cm) at<br />
harvest<br />
Panicle<br />
weight<br />
(g)<br />
Test<br />
weight<br />
(g)<br />
Grain<br />
yield<br />
(t/ha)<br />
Straw<br />
yield<br />
(kg/ha)<br />
Net<br />
returns<br />
(Rs./<br />
ha)<br />
Control (no manure & no fertilizer) 306.0 75.1 32.83 2.75 8.53 39969<br />
RDF (80-40 kg/ha N-P 2O 5) 306.8 89.2 33.93 3.12 8.64 44026<br />
RDF + 15 kg ZnSO 4 + seed treatment 308.8 88.6 34.33 3.29 8.80 47408<br />
RDF + 3.75 kg Zn and Fe each enriched<br />
FYM<br />
309.5 90.4 34.86 3.28 8.65 46570<br />
RDF + 7.5 kg Zn and Fe each enriched FYM 311.2 93.6 35.50 3.40 8.76 48942<br />
639 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
RDF + 11.25 kg Zn and Fe each enriched<br />
FYM<br />
313.8 93.6 35.76 3.55 8.76 51337<br />
RDF + 15 kg Zn and Fe each enriched FYM 316.3 95.3 37.04 3.64 8.86 52759<br />
RDF + 3.75 kg Zn and Fe each enriched VC 310.8 90.2 36.53 3.41 8.58 49552<br />
RDF + 7.5 kg Zn and Fe each enriched VC 313.3 93.5 36.73 3.52 8.65 51196<br />
RDF + 11.25 kg Zn and Fe each enriched VC 315.1 95.6 37.16 3.71 8.74 54855<br />
RDF + 15 kg Zn and Fe each enriched VC 316.5 94.2 36.76 3.70 8.85 53521<br />
SEm+ 1.91 1.14 0.14 0.146 0.089<br />
CD (P=0.05) 5.68 3.41 0.42 0.433 0.264<br />
Zinc and iron densification <strong>of</strong> rabi sorghum grain and their uptake as influenced by<br />
iron and zinc-enriched organic manures (pooled over 3 years)<br />
TREATMENT<br />
Grain concentration<br />
(ppm)<br />
Grain uptake<br />
(g/ha)<br />
Zn Fe Zn Fe<br />
Control (no manure & no fertilizer) 13.3 26.9 36.58 73.98<br />
RDF (80-40 kg/ha N-P 2O 5) 17.5 28.1 54.60 87.67<br />
RDF + 15 kg ZnSO 4 + seed treatment 26.0 28.6 85.54 94.09<br />
RDF + 3.75 kg Zn and Fe each enriched FYM 24.5 29.8 80.36 97.74<br />
RDF + 7.5 kg Zn and Fe each enriched FYM 28.6 30.9 97.24 105.06<br />
RDF + 11.25 kg Zn and Fe each enriched FYM 32.8 32.0 116.44 113.60<br />
RDF + 15 kg Zn and Fe each enriched FYM 33.5 32.6 121.94 118.66<br />
RDF + 3.75 kg Zn and Fe each enriched VC 27.0 31.6 92.07 107.76<br />
RDF + 7.5 kg Zn and Fe each enriched VC 29.0 31.3 102.08 110.18<br />
RDF + 11.25 kg Zn and Fe each enriched VC 33.2 31.8 123.17 117.98<br />
RDF + 15 kg Zn and Fe each enriched VC 35.0 32.6 129.50 120.62<br />
640 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
T4a-34P<br />
Improvement <strong>of</strong> Soil Fertility and Productivity by Use <strong>of</strong> Green Manuring<br />
Debesh Singh*, R.P.S. Tomar and Swati Singh<br />
NICRA, RVSKVV KVK, Morena, M.P.<br />
*debeshtomar315@gmal.com<br />
Green manuring is the practice <strong>of</strong> ploughing and turning in to the soil, under composed green<br />
plant tissue for the purpose <strong>of</strong> improving soil fertility and productivity. It increases the soil<br />
fertility by the direct addition <strong>of</strong> nitrogen and also improves the soil structure, water holding<br />
capacity and increase microbial population <strong>of</strong> soil by the addition <strong>of</strong> humus or organic matter.<br />
The soil physical properties that are affected by incorporation <strong>of</strong> the green manure includes the<br />
structure, moisture retention capacity consistency and density. Other properties such as the<br />
porosity, aeration, conductivity, hydraulics and infiltration are allied to the modifications to the<br />
soil structure. Post-harvest decaying roots significantly increased macrospores in soil. Green<br />
manuring had significant effect on increasing soil organic carbon. Green manure crops are grown<br />
in a field prior to crop cultivation and then cut and buried when approximately 50 percent <strong>of</strong> all<br />
plants are flowering. The practice <strong>of</strong> incorporating green leaf manure is different from green<br />
manure grown in situ, in this method the leaves are cut and brought to the farms in bundles.<br />
Green manuring is practiced according to suitability <strong>of</strong> soil and climatic conditions. Green<br />
manuring is generally done with sun hemp, dhaincha, cowpea, green gram, black gram; etc. these<br />
crops when rotten nourish the soil with their nutrients. Dhaincha as a green manure crop does<br />
well in the waterlogged and alkaline soils. Generally, a higher seed rate is recommended for<br />
green manuring. They absorb nutrient from the deeper soil layers and leave them in surface soil.<br />
The amount <strong>of</strong> green plant material buried stimulates the activity <strong>of</strong> the micro-organism<br />
inhabitant to the soil. Application <strong>of</strong> green manure crops supplements the chemical fertilizers and<br />
restores soil fertility. Therefore, it is an eco-friendly low-cost technology to conserve the natural<br />
resources besides maintaining environmental quality in a sustainable banner.<br />
641 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
T4a-35P-1325<br />
Influence <strong>of</strong> Different In-Situ Soil Moisture Conservation Techniques in<br />
Maize under Rainfed Agro-Eco System <strong>of</strong> Jammu Region<br />
Jai Kumar 1 *, A.P. Singh 1 , G. Ravindra Chary 2 , A. Gopinath 2 , Brinder Singh 1 , Rohit<br />
Shrama 1 and Sunny Raina 3<br />
1 All India Coordinated Project for Dryland agriculture, Rakh-Dhiansar, Samba (UT <strong>of</strong> J&K)<br />
2 AICRPDA, ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
3 Sher-e-Kashmir University <strong>of</strong> Agricultural Sciences and Technology <strong>of</strong> Jammu, Jammu and Kashmir<br />
(UT) 181 133<br />
*jkap006@gmail.com<br />
Maize (Zea mays L.) is the third most important cereal crop in the world after wheat and rice<br />
which occupies a prominent place in world agriculture due to its wide spread cultivation in<br />
tropics, sub-tropics and temperate regions <strong>of</strong> the world. Maize being grown globally on an area<br />
<strong>of</strong> about 197.19 million ha with a production <strong>of</strong> about <strong>of</strong> 1125.03 million tonnes. Maize in India<br />
is known as ‘King <strong>of</strong> cereals’ because <strong>of</strong> its high production potential and wider adaptability, is<br />
cultivated on an area <strong>of</strong> 9.21 million ha with a production <strong>of</strong> 25.13 million tonnes and the<br />
productivity <strong>of</strong> 26.3 q/ ha (Annonymous 2020). The state <strong>of</strong> Jammu and Kashmir has the<br />
distinction <strong>of</strong> being maize forms the staple diet <strong>of</strong> majority <strong>of</strong> the people living in the state and is<br />
grown on larger area than wheat and rice while in Jammu region, it is the second most cereal<br />
crop after wheat.<br />
Maize being the dominant Kharif crop <strong>of</strong> rainfed areas <strong>of</strong> Jammu province, is seriously suffering<br />
due to erratic and unpredictable rainfall, soils being light and medium texture leads to low water<br />
holding capacity and the lands are <strong>of</strong>ten having uneven topography, the rain water runs <strong>of</strong>f<br />
quickly and removes top soil and fertilizers leading to reduction in maize productivity. Maize is<br />
grown on farrowed or slopping lands, largely under Rainfed conditions and experience deficit<br />
moisture stress at different stages <strong>of</strong> growth. The uneven distribution <strong>of</strong> rainfall in time and space<br />
<strong>of</strong>ten causes dry spells <strong>of</strong> two weeks or even more resulting in moisture stress conditions during<br />
critical stages <strong>of</strong> maize crop, especially during the cob formation/grain filling stage which is the<br />
most critical stage with respect to productivity. Thus, the major constraint for establishing a crop<br />
is the lack <strong>of</strong> adequate moisture in the root zone (Hadda et al., 2010; Bhat et al., 2004).<br />
Therefore, it becomes essential to supply water to plant by adopting in-situ soil conservation<br />
measures for increasing water use efficiency. This cause adoption <strong>of</strong> in-situ moisture<br />
conservation practices to enhance productivity under dryland ecosystem (Subudhi, 2011). Hence,<br />
keeping the above facts in the forefront, a study on the influence <strong>of</strong> Different In-Situ Soil<br />
642 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Moisture Conservation Techniques in Maize under Rainfed Agro-Eco System <strong>of</strong> Jammu Region<br />
is proposed.<br />
Methodology<br />
A field experiment was conducted at the Research Farm <strong>of</strong> Advanced Centre for Rainfed<br />
Agriculture, ACRA Dhiansar <strong>of</strong> Sher-e-Kashmir University <strong>of</strong> Agricultural Sciences and<br />
Technology <strong>of</strong> Jammu during the Kharif season <strong>of</strong> 2016. The soil <strong>of</strong> the experimental field was<br />
sandy loam in texture, near to neutral, low in organic carbon and available nitrogen and medium<br />
in available phosphorous and potassium. The experiment was laid out in randomized block<br />
design during kharif season with three replications each. The experiment consisted <strong>of</strong> 9<br />
treatments viz. T1- Flat Bed, T2- Broad Bed Furrow, T3- Flat Bed + mulching with in-situ raised<br />
Dhaincha, T4-Broad Bed Furrow +mulching with in-situ raised Dhaincha, T5-Flat Bed<br />
+mulching with in situ raised Sunhemp, T6- Broad Bed Furrow +mulching with in-situ raised<br />
Sunhemp, T7- Flat Bed +mulching with Leuceana prunings, T8- Broad Bed Furrow +mulching<br />
with Leucaena prunings and T9- Farmer’s practice. The field was ploughed twice with disc<br />
harrow followed by planking to prepare a fine seed bed. Plot paths, replication borders and<br />
drainage channels were made manually. The plots were levelled before planting <strong>of</strong> kharif maize.<br />
However, Broad Bed and Furrow plots were raised using Bed making machine. Hybrid maize<br />
variety Double dekalb was sown in line during July using full dose <strong>of</strong> P and K along with 2/3 rd<br />
dose <strong>of</strong> N as basal dose at the time <strong>of</strong> sowing through inorganic sources <strong>of</strong> nutrients viz. Urea,<br />
DAP and MOP, respectively as per package <strong>of</strong> practices and remaining Nitrogen was applied<br />
just before the application <strong>of</strong> mulches while in farmers practice only Urea and DAP as inorganic<br />
fertilizers were applied in maize sown by broadcasting method without following any plant<br />
protection measures . However, the seeds <strong>of</strong> the mulch crops viz: Dhaincha and Sunhemp were<br />
also sown by broadcasting method at the time <strong>of</strong> final ploughing as per the technical programme.<br />
Leucaena pruning’s (Ex-situ) were taken from the plants growing in surroundings 35 DAS at the<br />
time <strong>of</strong> spreading <strong>of</strong> mulches.<br />
Results<br />
The experimental results revealed that all the moisture conservation techniques showed<br />
significant results over the other treatments. However, the treatment (T4) Broad Bed Furrow +<br />
mulching with in-situ raised Dhaincha recorded significantly higher values <strong>of</strong> Growth and yield<br />
and yield attributing characters and was found to be statistically at par with the treatment (T8)<br />
Broad Bed Furrow (BBF) + Mulching with Leucaena leaves and Treatment (T6) Broad Bed<br />
Furrow +mulching with in-situ raised Sunhemp. However, the treatment (T4) Broad Bed Furrow<br />
+ mulching with in-situ raised dhaincha recorded significantly higher grain yield (3281 kg ha -1 )<br />
643 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
alongwith highest net returns, B:C ratio and RWUE (kg/ha/mm) to the tune <strong>of</strong> Rs.38905/ha,<br />
1.61 and 5.19 respectively while the lowest net returns and B:C were recorded in farmer’s<br />
practice.<br />
Yield and economics <strong>of</strong> maize crop under different in-situ soil moisture conservation<br />
Treatments<br />
techniques during Kharif<br />
Yield (kg<br />
ha -1 )<br />
Cost <strong>of</strong><br />
cultivation<br />
(Rs ha -1 )<br />
Net<br />
return<br />
(Rs ha -1 )<br />
B:C<br />
ratio<br />
RWUE<br />
(kg/hamm)<br />
T1 Flat Bed 2445 19890 27983 1.41 3.87<br />
T2 Broad Bed Furrow (BBF) 2705 21740 31116 1.43 4.28<br />
T3<br />
Flat Bed + Mulching with in-situ<br />
raised Dhaincha<br />
T4 Broad Bed Furrow (BBF) +<br />
Mulching with in-situ raised<br />
Dhaincha<br />
T5<br />
Flat Bed + Mulching with in-situ<br />
raised Sunhemp<br />
T6 Broad Bed Furrow (BBF) +<br />
Mulching with in-situ raised<br />
Sunhemp<br />
T7<br />
Flat Bed + Mulching with<br />
Leucaena prunings<br />
T8 Broad Bed Furrow (BBF) +<br />
Mulching with Leucaena leaves<br />
2910 22240 33690 1.51 4.60<br />
3281 24090 38905 1.61 5.19<br />
2812 22240 32032 1.44 4.45<br />
3175 24090 36680 1.52 5.02<br />
2875 22665 33053 1.46 4.55<br />
3235 24515 37726 1.54 5.12<br />
T9 Farmer’s practice 2120 17479 24158 1.38 3.35<br />
CD (5%) 254 - - - -<br />
Conclusion<br />
On the basis <strong>of</strong> experimental findings, it may be concluded that among the different in-situ soil<br />
moisture conservation techniques in maize, Broad Bed Furrow (BBF) + mulching with in-situ<br />
raised Dhaincha, provided significantly highest grain yield with maximum net returns, B:C ratio<br />
and Rain Water Use Efficiency under rainfed situations which not only helped in conserving the<br />
moisture in the soil pr<strong>of</strong>ile but also enhanced the productivity <strong>of</strong> maize especially during<br />
mid/terminal dry spell situations which can contribute to food security <strong>of</strong> kandi belt farmer’s<br />
under the Shiwalik Foothils <strong>of</strong> Jammu and Kashmir.<br />
644 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
References<br />
Annonymous 2020. World agricultural production. United States Department <strong>of</strong> Agriculture.<br />
available at : https://apps.fas.usda.gov/psdonline/circulars/production.<br />
Bhatt R, Khera KL, and Arora S. 2004. Effect <strong>of</strong> Tillage and Mulching on Yield <strong>of</strong> Corn in the<br />
Submontaneous Rainfed region <strong>of</strong> Punjab, India. International Journal <strong>of</strong> Agriculture and<br />
Biology, 6: 26-28.<br />
Hadda, M.S., Khera, K.L. and Kukal, S.S. 2010. Soil and water conservation practices and soil<br />
productivity in North-Western sub-mountaneous tract <strong>of</strong> India: A review. Indian Journal<br />
<strong>of</strong> Soil Conservation, 28: 187-192.<br />
Subudhi, R. 2011. Effect <strong>of</strong> Conservation Trenches on Plantation Crop in Degraded Watershed<br />
in Kandhamal District <strong>of</strong> Odisha. Agrotechnol 2: 112.<br />
T4a-36P-1250<br />
Influence <strong>of</strong> Medicinal Crops used as Groundcover Management <strong>of</strong> Guava<br />
Orchard on Soil Properties <strong>of</strong> Northern India.<br />
Manpreet Singh 1 *and Kanwaljit Singh 2<br />
1 Department <strong>of</strong> Agriculture, Guru Nanak Dev University, Amritsar-143001 (India)<br />
2 P.G. Department <strong>of</strong> Agriculture, Khalsa College Amritsar-143002 (India)<br />
*manpreetjatana88@gmail.com<br />
The conventional tillage or use <strong>of</strong> weedicides is a common practice to control weeds in an<br />
orchard but it is not considered a sustainable approach. Better and scientifically grown ground<br />
cover crops may have been proved to be valuable for the orchard environment which includes<br />
increased beneficial organism populations, improved soil organic matter and resilience and<br />
reduced soil sickness (Lemessa and Wakjira 2015). Intercropping is one <strong>of</strong> the techniques <strong>of</strong> land<br />
utilization for greater stability in production as well as help the farmers in maintaining the soil<br />
fertility level (Bhattnagar et al., 2007). The combination <strong>of</strong> medicinal plants provides another<br />
chance to study diversification <strong>of</strong> existing land use systems for beneficial environmental impacts<br />
and higher pr<strong>of</strong>its as related to sole cropping systems. Hence, the experiment was carried out to<br />
evaluate the reliable intercropping system in the guava orchard to upgrade the soil health.<br />
Methodology<br />
During 2019-20, the field experiment was conducted at the Horticulture Research Farm, Khalsa<br />
College Amritsar. The eight-year-old plantation <strong>of</strong> guava at 6 x 6 m spacing, inter-cropped with<br />
645 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
six herbal medicinal plants crops. The data was analyzed by online OPSTAT s<strong>of</strong>tware and LSD<br />
(least significant difference) was calculated at 5 per cent level <strong>of</strong> significance (Snedecor and<br />
Cochran 1967).<br />
Results<br />
There was a significant variation in bulk density <strong>of</strong> soil at both depths. The lowest bulk density<br />
was recorded in mentha and brahmi intercropped block (T4 and T2) which was on par with<br />
turmeric, lemongrass and stevia intercropped treatments (T4, T3 and T5). The sole treatments (T7)<br />
had higher bulk density values among all other treatments.<br />
Soil porosity varied from 47.80 to 49.81 % and 46.93 to 48.74 % from both depths 0-15 and 15-<br />
30cm, respectively. While the intercropping <strong>of</strong> brahmi (49.81%) under guava-based system had<br />
significantly higher porosity which was very close to mentha intercropped blocks (49.56%) and<br />
at par with treatments T3, T5 and T6 and lowest value found in T7 (guava sole).<br />
The availability <strong>of</strong> N, P and K <strong>of</strong> soil at depth 0-15cm, were significantly higher under guavabased<br />
cropping systems in all the treatments than the guava sole (Fig.). Significantly maximum<br />
available N was recorded in T4, which was followed by T2 and the lowest available nitrogen was<br />
found in the T7 treatment.<br />
Avail. N Avail. P Avail. K<br />
350<br />
300<br />
250<br />
200<br />
150<br />
100<br />
50<br />
0<br />
Guava + Aloe<br />
Vera<br />
Guava +<br />
Brahmi<br />
Guava +<br />
Lemongrass<br />
Guava +<br />
Mentha<br />
Guava + Stevia Guava +<br />
Turmeric<br />
Guava sole<br />
T1 T2 T3 T4 T5 T6 T7<br />
Depth 0-15cm<br />
646 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
350<br />
300<br />
250<br />
200<br />
150<br />
100<br />
50<br />
0<br />
Guava + Aloe<br />
Vera<br />
Guava +<br />
Brahmi<br />
Guava +<br />
Lemongrass<br />
Guava +<br />
Mentha<br />
Avail. N Avail. P Avail. K<br />
Guava + Stevia Guava +<br />
Turmeric<br />
Guava sole<br />
T1 T2 T3 T4 T5 T6 T7<br />
Depth 15-30cm<br />
Effect <strong>of</strong> medicinal crops on soil available NPK at depth 0-15cm and 15-30 cm<br />
Similarly, the available P and K content <strong>of</strong> soil were influenced through different intercropping<br />
systems. However, soil P content was maximum under mentha crop (T4) and lower in guava<br />
sole system (T7) at both depths. The available K status <strong>of</strong> soil was recorded highest when<br />
medicinal crops were grown under guava-based intercropping as compared to guava sole.<br />
Conclusion<br />
From the present investigation it is concluded that he combination <strong>of</strong> fruit orchard and<br />
medicinal crops seems to improve the physical and chemical properties as well as status <strong>of</strong><br />
macro-nutrients <strong>of</strong> orchard soil more than guava alone, probably due to more and faster<br />
decomposition <strong>of</strong> litter fall and root biomass <strong>of</strong> cover crops. Hence, guava based hortimedicinal<br />
cropping system can be adopted in large scale to improve soil fertility status.<br />
References<br />
Bhatnagar, P., Kaul, M.K., and Singh, J., 2007. Effect <strong>of</strong> intercropping in Kinnow based<br />
production system. Ind. J. <strong>of</strong> Arid Hort. 2: 15-17.<br />
Lemessa, F., and Wakjira, M., 2015. Cover crops as a means <strong>of</strong> ecological weed management in<br />
Agro-ecosystems. J. <strong>of</strong> crop sci. and biotech. 133–145.<br />
647 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
T4a-37P-1318<br />
Influence <strong>of</strong> Natural Farming on Soil Properties, Crop Protection and<br />
Production <strong>of</strong> Quality Produce in Sugarcane<br />
K.V. Ramana Murthy, Dr M. Bharathalakshmi, Ch. S. Rama Lakshmi, M. Visalakshi,<br />
P. Kishore Varma and D. Adilakshmi<br />
Regional Agricultural Research Station, Anakapalli-531001, Andhra Pradesh<br />
The increased and <strong>of</strong>ten indiscriminate use <strong>of</strong> fertilizers and pesticides immensely harmed<br />
biological activity <strong>of</strong> the soil rendering it almost lifeless in vast areas. Agriculture production has<br />
tended to remain either stagnant or is declining despite application <strong>of</strong> high-cost inputs in large<br />
number <strong>of</strong> agricultural zones. Agriculture production despite troughs due to drought and aberrant<br />
weather conditions showed remarkable resilience but the quantum jump in production is<br />
conspicuous by its absence. Experts attribute this stagnation to destruction <strong>of</strong> soil health due to<br />
application <strong>of</strong> fertilizers and pesticides. Hence, this study was formulated to validate the natural<br />
farming practices in sugarcane + pulse intercropping for sustained soil and crop productivity in<br />
sugarcane.<br />
Methodology<br />
A field trial was taken up during 2020-21 and 2021-22 at Regional Agricultural Research<br />
Station, Anakapalli, Andhra Pradesh in sandy clay loam soils, The pH <strong>of</strong> the soil was 7.22, EC<br />
0.27 dS m -1 . The soil was low in available nitrogen (188 kg/ha), medium in available phosphorus<br />
(72 kg/ha) and high in available potassium (223 kg/ha). The micronutrient availability <strong>of</strong> zinc<br />
was 0.97 ppm, Copper 2.32 ppm, Manganese 14.58 ppm and Iron 10.15 ppm. The treatments<br />
were T1-Integrated Crop Management (University recommendation), T2-Natural Farming and<br />
Organic Farming and T3-Palekar’s Zero Based Natural Farming (ZBNF) replicated thrice. The<br />
test variety was a short duration sugarcane variety 2009 A 252 (Naveen).<br />
The weather<br />
conditions that prevailed during the growth period <strong>of</strong> sugarcane during these two years were<br />
congenial for the crop growth. A rainfall <strong>of</strong>1670.5 mm during 2020-21 and 1306. 4 mm during<br />
2021-22 was received with rainy days <strong>of</strong> 72 and 69 days respectively. The protocol was followed<br />
as per gelines for the three systems <strong>of</strong> cultivation.<br />
Results<br />
During 2020-21 in plant crop and in 2021-22 in ratoon crop, with respect to the soil physico<br />
chemical properties, available phosphorus and potassium, Zinc and Iron were higher in ICM<br />
while available nitrogen, Fe and Mn were high with OF & NF. Soil microbial population<br />
648 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
(Azotobactor and Azospirillum) at grand growth stage was higher in OF&NF followed by ICM<br />
whereas phosphorus solubilizers population was higher in ZBNF plots. Dehydrosenase and<br />
urease activity were higher in OF&NF. Acid phosphatase and alkaline phosphatase were higher<br />
in ICM. Earth worm population at different growth stages was higher in ZBNF. Similar studies<br />
by Singh and Srivastava, 2011 indicated that the highest enhancement in organic carbon content<br />
at ratoon harvest was recorded in the treatment receiving 100 per cent N through organic +<br />
bi<strong>of</strong>ertilizers + inter cropping <strong>of</strong> legume with rhizobium + pests/diseases control by either<br />
synthetic pesticides or biopesticides. Incidence <strong>of</strong> YLD was 2.82 per cent in ICM, 1.1 percent in<br />
OF and NF and 1.7 per cent in Palekar’s ZBNF. The cumulative incidence <strong>of</strong> ESB at 120 DAP<br />
was more in ICM followed by OF and NF while it was lowest in Palekars ZBNF. The incidence<br />
<strong>of</strong> INB was higher in Palekar’s ZBNF while it was lowest in ICM. Among three methods <strong>of</strong><br />
cultivation higher tiller population, stalk population, yield attributes and yield were higher with<br />
ICM followed by OF and NF while the lowest cane yield) was recorded with Palekar’s ZBNF.<br />
Application <strong>of</strong> FYM, cane trash, pressmud, vermicompost and biocompost in combination with<br />
recommended inorganic fertilizers have recorded increased cane yield over inorganic fertilizer<br />
alone, besides improving the soil fertility and economizing the cane production (Shilpa et al.,<br />
2017).<br />
Conclusion<br />
From the mean data it can be interpreted that ICM gave the highest cane yield, sugar yield during both<br />
years in plant and ratoon crop as well as compared to OF and NF and Palekar’s ZBNF methods.<br />
Effect <strong>of</strong> Natural Farming on soil physicochemical properties in post harvest soils <strong>of</strong> Sugarcane<br />
Particulars Initial ICM<br />
NF &<br />
OF<br />
Mean <strong>of</strong> 2 years<br />
ZBNF<br />
pH 7.22 7.19 7.14 7.12<br />
EC (dS/m) 0.27 0.245 0.232 0.211<br />
OC (%) 0.61 0.61 0.64 0.64<br />
Available Nitrogen (kg/ha) 188 207.5 213.75 196.87<br />
Available Phosphorus (kg/ha) 72 77.25 76.32 74.41<br />
Available Potassium (kg/ha) 223 234 234 223<br />
Av. Zn (ppm) 0.97 0.89 0.89 0.85<br />
Av. Cu (ppm) 2.32 2.94 2.52 2.58<br />
Av. Mn (ppm) 14.58 15.49 16.44 13.92<br />
Av. Fe (ppm) 10.15 12.92 13.61 13.50<br />
649 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Influence <strong>of</strong> natural farming on growth, yield, soil microbial and soil enzymatic activity <strong>of</strong><br />
sugarcane<br />
Particulars ICM NF & OF ZBNF<br />
Mean Mean Mean<br />
Shoot population (240 DAP) 79795 72251.5 42929<br />
Plant height (240 DAP) 240.7 193.835 152.75<br />
LMC at Harvest(cm) 232.95 184.965 146.785<br />
Avg. Cane Girth(cm) 2.47 2.525 2.41<br />
Number <strong>of</strong> internodes/Cane 25.7 23.315 19.7<br />
NMC per hectare 74621.5 68588 42583<br />
Cane Yield(t/ha) 76.45 65.15 40.235<br />
Intercrop (Greengram) yield-kg/ha -- -- 685.5<br />
Cane equivalent yield 76.45 65.15 55.725<br />
Brix (%) 20.9 20.995 20.325<br />
Sucrose (%) 18.99 18.87 18.95<br />
CCS (%) 14.655 14.425 13.8<br />
Purity (%) 90.25 87.06 89.08<br />
Sugar yield (t/ha) 11.32 9.45 7.68<br />
Jaggery Recovery (%) 7.42 6.56 5.54<br />
Jaggery Yield (t/ha) 5.72 4.24 2.74<br />
Azatobactor (x 10 4 cfu/g soil) 5.5 5.0 6.5<br />
Azospirillum (x 10 4 cfu/g soil) 8.0 3.0 7.0<br />
Rhizobium (x 10 5 cfu/g soil) 2.5 0.0 2.0<br />
Phosphorous solubilizers (x 10 4 cfu/g soil) 3.0 1.0 3.5<br />
Dehydrosenase (µg TPF/g soil/day) 2.1 3.4 2.5<br />
Urease (µg NH4+/5 g. soil/2 hr) 39.0 42.0 30.5<br />
Acid Phosphatase (µg PNP/g. soil/hr) 55.0 44.0 38.0<br />
Alkaline Phosphatase (µg PNP/g. soil/hr) 64.5 53.5 48.5<br />
Yellow leaf disease 2.8 1.1 1.7<br />
Ring spot 2.5 2.7 4.4<br />
ESB (% DH) upto 120 DAP 6.6 5.5 2.3<br />
Internode borer incidence (%) 24.4 49.0 41.0<br />
650 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
References<br />
Shilpa V. Chogatapur, Vishwajith and Reshma Sutar. 2017. Organic Sugarcane: A Review.<br />
Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci. 6(12): 1729-1738. doi:<br />
https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2017.612.196<br />
Singh, K. P. and Srivastava, T. K. .2011. Sugarcane productivity and soil fertility in plant -ratoon<br />
system under integrated and organic nutrient management in sub-tropics. Ind. J.<br />
Sugarcane Tech., 26(1):10-13.<br />
T4a-38P-1461<br />
In-Situ Moisture Conservation Techniques for Timely Sowing <strong>of</strong> Wheat Crop<br />
in Rabi Season Under Kandi Areas <strong>of</strong> District Kathua<br />
Vishal Sharma 1 *, Vishal Mahajan 1 , Berjesh Ajrawat 1 , Anamika Jamwal 1 , Ashu Sharma 1 ,<br />
Ajay Kumar 1 , Sahil Sharma 1 and B. C. Sharma 2<br />
1 Krishi Vigyan Kendra- Kathua, SKUAST-Jammu, INDIA<br />
2 FoA, SKUAST-Jammu, INDIA<br />
*vsagro14@gmail.com<br />
Wheat (Triticum aestivum) plays a vital role in meeting the food requirement <strong>of</strong> both urban and<br />
rural population in India but its yield is low in rainfed areas because <strong>of</strong> unavailability <strong>of</strong> moisture<br />
at the time <strong>of</strong> sowing which adversely affect the emergence and plant establishment. It is the<br />
most important staple food crop <strong>of</strong> district Kathua having 41% share, cultivated in about 52.493<br />
thousand hectares with production and productivity <strong>of</strong> 11.47 lakh quintals and 24.0 q/ha,<br />
respectively. Wheat-maize is prominent cropping sequence in the district. The farmers <strong>of</strong> Kandi<br />
areas mostly rely on the cultivation <strong>of</strong> maize and wheat along with some pulses and oilseeds for<br />
their livelihood. However, weather is a critical factor influencing the production <strong>of</strong> crops in this<br />
region. Weather effects on crop yield are manifold, making their assessment challenging. Timely<br />
rainfall in district viewed as a dominant climatic element influencing timely sowing and<br />
ultimately the yield <strong>of</strong> wheat crop. The frequent dry spells during the sowing time greatly<br />
influence the crop productivity and become the limiting factor to achieve potential productivity.<br />
Hence, to overcome with untimely rainfalls at the time <strong>of</strong> sowing <strong>of</strong> wheat crop as experienced<br />
in last few years an experiment was formulated to study the effect <strong>of</strong> In-situ conservation <strong>of</strong><br />
kharif moisture for timely sowing <strong>of</strong> wheat in rabi season under rainfed conditions in the form <strong>of</strong><br />
on farm trials (OFTs) during rabi 2021-22.<br />
651 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Methodology<br />
The study was based on on-farm trials carried out at five locations in NICRA village under<br />
Kathua District during the rabi 2021-22 using cv. WH 1080. The experiment was laid out in<br />
randomized block design with three replications, consisting <strong>of</strong> three treatments. The experiment<br />
comprised <strong>of</strong> 3 treatments: T1- Farmer practice (sowing after rainfall), T2- After harvest plough<br />
and heavy planking, T3- After harvest plough and heavy planking + mulching with maize straw.<br />
It represents the sub-tropical zone. Most <strong>of</strong> the farmers <strong>of</strong> this region are small and marginal<br />
farmers, are economically poor and practice subsistence farming. Under such conditions, due to<br />
unfavourable climatic conditions the productivity <strong>of</strong> crops is much below the national average<br />
productivity. District Kathua <strong>of</strong> Jammu and Kashmir is located on the northern side <strong>of</strong> the state.<br />
It lies between 32 0 00’ 17’ to 32 0 00’ 55’ N latitude and 75 0 00’ 70’ to 76 0 00’ 16’ E longitude. It<br />
has a total geographical area <strong>of</strong> 2.65 lakh hectare, out <strong>of</strong> which 1.27 lakh ha is gross sown area<br />
and 64829 ha (41/%) is net sown area. The soils <strong>of</strong> this area are deficit in organic carbon, humus<br />
and low in available nitrogen, phosphorous and medium in potassium. Other major constraints<br />
leading to yield gaps are low availability <strong>of</strong> quality seeds organic manures, bio pesticides, nonstandardization<br />
and non-adoption <strong>of</strong> improved production practices. Therefore, an attempt has<br />
been made in which moisture has been conserved for timely sowing <strong>of</strong> wheat crop on Kandi<br />
areas.<br />
Results<br />
Results indicated that the integration <strong>of</strong> plough and heavy planking with maize straw mulching<br />
resulted in higher grain and straw yield <strong>of</strong> wheat crop at all the location <strong>of</strong> OFTs in comparison<br />
to farmer practice. Combination <strong>of</strong> after harvest plough and heavy planking + mulching with<br />
maize straw resulted in significantly higher yield <strong>of</strong> wheat (38.20 q ha -1 ) as compared to after<br />
harvest plough and heavy planking alone (34.4 q ha -1 ) and farmer practice (30.0 q ha -1 ).<br />
Adoption <strong>of</strong> improved sowing technology increased yield by 27 per cent over farmers’ practices.<br />
Significant increase in grain yield <strong>of</strong> wheat crop with integration <strong>of</strong> plough and heavy planking<br />
with maize straw mulching might be due to timely sowing <strong>of</strong> wheat crop during untimely<br />
rainfalls. It was further revealed that higher rates <strong>of</strong> mulch conserved more soil moisture by<br />
providing better cover to the non-cropped area. Mulch application had also significant effect on<br />
emergence count. Increase in emergence count with high rates <strong>of</strong> mulches is attributed to soil<br />
moisture conservation. Mulch cover reduces evaporation losses from soil surfaces thus<br />
increasing moisture availability for germinating seeds. This contributed to better crop stand and<br />
this effect is reflected in the number <strong>of</strong> total tillers per unit area. Similarly, Sandal and Acharya<br />
(1997) investigated different tillage practices in a maize-wheat cropping sequence and reported<br />
652 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
that ‘maize sown on conventionally tilled plots mulched with lantana and sowing wheat with<br />
minimum tillage + mulching with lantana’ conserved sufficient moisture and resulted in timely<br />
sowing <strong>of</strong> rainfed wheat with higher grain yield. The economical parameters indicated that<br />
highest net pr<strong>of</strong>it <strong>of</strong> 53973 ha -1 was recorded with treatment T3 over farmer practices 40550<br />
ha -1 . Benefit cost ratio for after harvest plough and heavy planking + Mulching with maize straw<br />
and farmer practice was 1.69 and 1.40, respectively.<br />
Conclusion<br />
Hence from the investigations it is clear that plough and heavy planking with maize straw<br />
mulching was found to be effective in influencing grain yield <strong>of</strong> wheat crop as compare to farmer<br />
practice i.e. sowing after rainfall. Because under Kandi conditions this technique helped to<br />
enhance the moisture contents <strong>of</strong> soil by restoring the previous crop moisture and which is<br />
ultimately used for timely sowing <strong>of</strong> wheat crop during untimely rainfalls at the time <strong>of</strong> sowing.<br />
However, the economic feasibility <strong>of</strong> maize straw application is need to be investigated. It is<br />
therefore, proposed that alternative options/ mulching materials for maize straw needs also to be<br />
investigated for timely availability and at economical rates which could be as beneficial as the<br />
maize straw mulch and should be free from any allelopathic effects.<br />
References<br />
Sandal, S.K. and Acharya, C.L. 1997. Indian J. Agric. Sci., 67: 227-231.<br />
T4a-39P-1329<br />
Nutrient Management in Soybean Based Double Cropping Systems under<br />
Residual Moisture<br />
Pradeep Kumar 1* , C. K. Arya 2 , M. K. Sharma 3 and Pratap Singh 4<br />
1,2 AU, Kota, Rajasthan, India<br />
3 Agriculture Research Station, Ummedganj, AU, Kota, Rajasthan, India<br />
4 Directorate <strong>of</strong> Research, AU, Kota, Rajasthan, India<br />
*Pkprithvi139@gmail.com<br />
Soybean, also known as wonder crop, is a legume as well as oilseed crop. It is the third largest<br />
oilseed crop <strong>of</strong> India after rapeseed mustard and groundnut and ranks first in edible oil in world.<br />
India ranks fifth in area and production <strong>of</strong> soybean in the world. Traditional non-fermented food<br />
uses <strong>of</strong> soybeans include soy milk from which t<strong>of</strong>u and t<strong>of</strong>u skin are made. Fermented soy foods<br />
include soy sauce, fermented bean paste, natto and tempeh. Together protein and soybean oil<br />
content account for 56% <strong>of</strong> dry soybeans by weight (36% protein and 5% ash).100 grams <strong>of</strong> raw<br />
653 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
soybeans supply 446 calories and 9% water, 30% carbohydrates, 20% total fat and 36% protein.<br />
Nutrient management plays major role in higher production <strong>of</strong> crops especially in cropping<br />
system under dryland condition. Effective nutrient management facilitates required nutrient for<br />
the plant and help the crop to survive several types <strong>of</strong> biotic and abiotic stress in cropping<br />
system. Indiscriminate application <strong>of</strong> the inorganic fertilizers are known to have adverse effects<br />
on soil and human health. Therefore, it is essential to utilize organic sources <strong>of</strong> nutrients in order<br />
to increase the production <strong>of</strong> crop by maintaining soil fertility. Farmyard manure is a major<br />
source <strong>of</strong> nutrients, which also helps in maintaining soil fertility and increasing the water holding<br />
capacity <strong>of</strong> soil and productivity <strong>of</strong> the soil. Among soybean based double cropping, in haroti<br />
region <strong>of</strong> Rajasthan, coriander, linseed and chickpea are major crops that can be grown in on<br />
residual moisture in Rabi season under dryland agriculture. In Rajasthan, it is cultivated on 2.11<br />
million ha with a production <strong>of</strong> 2.26 million tonnes and contributes 14% <strong>of</strong> total country’s<br />
chickpea production (Anonymous 2021). Coriander is a major spices crop grown in experimental<br />
domain area <strong>of</strong> Jhalawar. Chickpea is having deep root system, able to utilize deeper residual<br />
moisture more efficiently and also facilitate deep sowing because <strong>of</strong> their large size seeds.<br />
Therefore, this experiment was conducted to study the nutrient management in soybean based<br />
double cropping systems under residual moisture.<br />
Methodology<br />
A field experiment was conducted under AICRPDA project, during kharif & rabi season <strong>of</strong> three<br />
consecutive years from 2018-19 to 2020-21 at Agricultural Research Sub Station, Aklera, AU,<br />
Kota. Geographically, this is located in the south east part <strong>of</strong> the Rajasthan with 24.41 o Latitude<br />
and 76.56 o Longitude. According to Agro-climatic zones the domain comes in Humid South<br />
Eastern Plain, i.e. zone V <strong>of</strong> the Rajasthan. The Humid South Eastern plains (zone V) are<br />
popularly known as the Hadauti plateau. Summer temperatures reach up to 45 o C and in winter it<br />
falls to 2.4 o C. The relative humidity is generally high. The annual rainfall varies from 452 to 985<br />
mm. The landscape is characterized by hills pediments and vast alluvial plain formed by the<br />
rivers Parbati, Parwan and their tributaries. The soil <strong>of</strong> experimental field was black <strong>of</strong> alluvial<br />
origin with pH 8.1, available N (146.57 kg ha -1 ), available P (29 kg ha -1 ), available K (239 kg ha -<br />
1 ) and has about 0.17% SOC. The experiment was laid out in split plot design consisting <strong>of</strong> three<br />
level <strong>of</strong> cropping system i.e. Soybean-Chickpea, Soybean- coriander and Soybean-Linseed in<br />
Main plots and six levels <strong>of</strong> nutriment managements practices i.e. 100 % RDF (Inorganic), 100<br />
% RDF (Inorganic) + Sulphur @ 10 kg ha -1 , 75% RDF (inorganic) + 25% through FYM, 75%<br />
RDF (inorganic) + 25% through FYM + Sulphur @ 10 kg ha -1 , 50% RDF (inorganic) + 50%<br />
through FYM and 50% RDF (inorganic) + 50% through FYM + Sulphur @ 10 kg ha -1 . The<br />
varieties were taken up as Soybean-JS-20-29, Chick pea –GNG- 1958, Coriander RKD -18 and<br />
654 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Linseed KBA-3. The data recorded were statistically analyzed by using technique <strong>of</strong> ANOVA<br />
i.e. analysis <strong>of</strong> variance and significance was determined as given by Panse and Sukhatme (1967)<br />
by computerised programme.<br />
Results<br />
Analysis showed that under different cropping system soybean-chickpea results significantly<br />
highest soybean equivalent yield <strong>of</strong> rabi crops (2444 kg ha -1 ), system productivity (3594 kg ha -1 ),<br />
system Net return (81583/- ha -1 ) and B:C ratio (2.02) as compared to other treatments. Deep root<br />
system <strong>of</strong> chickpea could lead to efficient utilization <strong>of</strong> residual moisture and nutrients also in<br />
deeper layer <strong>of</strong> soil pr<strong>of</strong>ile.<br />
Effect <strong>of</strong> nutrient management in soybean based double cropping system under residual<br />
moisture on Soybean equivalent yield <strong>of</strong> Rabi crops, system productivity, net return<br />
Treatment<br />
and B:C ratio (pooled)<br />
Soybean equivalent<br />
yield <strong>of</strong> Rabi crops<br />
(kg ha -1 )<br />
Cropping system<br />
System<br />
productiv<br />
ity<br />
(kg ha -1 )<br />
System<br />
Net<br />
return<br />
( )<br />
System<br />
B:C<br />
ratio<br />
Soybean-Chickpea 2444 3594 81583 2.02<br />
Soybean-Coriander 1724 2840 61943 1.69<br />
Soybean-Linseed 1250 2382 48065 1.22<br />
SEm ± 28 35 1297 0.03<br />
CD (P=0.05) 97 125 5161 0.12<br />
Nutrient management<br />
100 % RDF (Inorganic) 1673 2610 52239 1.58<br />
100 % RDF (Inorganic) + Sulphur @ 10 kg<br />
ha -1 1703 2680 54290 1.61<br />
75% RDF (inorganic) + 25% through FYM 1782 2900 61096 1.75<br />
75% RDF (inorganic) + 25% through FYM<br />
+ Sulphur @ 10 kg ha -1 1810 2980 63443 1.79<br />
50% RDF (inorganic) + 50% through FYM 1926 3208 70467 1.91<br />
50% RDF (inorganic) + 50% through FYM<br />
+ Sulphur @ 10 kg ha -1 1969 3285 72881 1.94<br />
SEm± 15 33 1159 0.03<br />
CD (P=0.05) 44 92 3221 0.08<br />
655 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
On other hand, application <strong>of</strong> nutrients in kharif as 50% RDF (inorganic) + 50% through FYM +<br />
Sulphur @ 10 kg ha -1 gave maximum soybean equivalent yield <strong>of</strong> Rabi crops (1969 kg ha -1 ),<br />
system productivity (3285 kg ha -1 ) (Chaturvedi and Chandel, 2005), Maximum System net return<br />
(Rs. 72881/- ha -1 ) & highest B:C ratio (1.94) which were found at par with the application <strong>of</strong><br />
50% RDF (inorganic) + 50% through FYM as (1926 kg ha -1 ), (3208 kg ha -1 ), (Rs. 70467/- ha -1 )<br />
& (1.91), respectively.<br />
Conclusion<br />
The results concluded that Soybean –chickpea cropping system with application <strong>of</strong> nutrients in<br />
kharif as 50% RDF (inorganic) + 50% through FYM + Sulphur @ 10 kg ha -1 was found<br />
productivity operative and economically worthwhile under dryland farming condition.<br />
References<br />
Anonymous 2021. http://www.agriculture.rajasthan.gov.in/content/agriculture/hi/<br />
Agriculture.html.<br />
Chaturvedi, S, Chandel, A. S. 2005. Influence <strong>of</strong> organic and inorganic fertilization on soil<br />
fertility and productivity <strong>of</strong> soybean (Glycine max). Indian J. Agron., 50(4):311-313.<br />
Panse, V. G. and Sukhatme, P. V. 1978. Statistical methods for Agricultural workers. ICAR<br />
publication, New Delhi. pp. 157 – 165.<br />
T4a-40P-1387<br />
Nutrient Management Practices in Finger Millet under Zero Tillage<br />
Conditions in Rice Fallows<br />
Y. Sandhya Rani*, U. Triveni, N. Anuradha and T.S.S.K. Patro<br />
Agricultural Research Station, Vizianagaram – 535 001,<br />
Acharya N.G. Ranga Agricultural University, Guntur, A.P.<br />
*sandhyarani33756@gmail.com<br />
Finger millet [Eleusine coracana (L.) Gaertn.] is a stable food crop for millions <strong>of</strong> people in the<br />
semi-arid region <strong>of</strong> the world, particularly in Africa and India. The crop is adapted to a wide<br />
range <strong>of</strong> climate and can be grown in variety <strong>of</strong> soils with medium or low water holding<br />
capacity, but requires minimum rainfall <strong>of</strong> 800 mm per annum. Tillage is done to control weeds<br />
which can ultimately lead to soil compaction, loss <strong>of</strong> organic matter, and death <strong>of</strong> soil microbes.<br />
So, all these after effects can be avoided by zero tillage. The major constraints for rainfed rabi<br />
cropping are faster receding residual moisture in fields after rice harvest, uncertain rabi rainfall,<br />
656 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
soil hardiness in the puddled rice fields, lack <strong>of</strong> short duration varieties that could facilitate<br />
timely sowing <strong>of</strong> rabi crops. To utilize residual moisture, pulse crops can be grown in rabi crops<br />
and they are need to be sown immediately after rice harvesting. But, now a days the pulse<br />
productivity in rice fallows is gradually decreasing due to poor germination <strong>of</strong> seeds, uneven<br />
moisture in the field, lack <strong>of</strong> improved varieties to withstand cold, Yellow Mosaic Virus,<br />
powdery mildew and water stress at flowering stage. Under such conditions most <strong>of</strong> the farmers<br />
are inclining towards growing <strong>of</strong> finger millet crop under zero tillage conditions Hence keeping<br />
in view the importance <strong>of</strong> zero tillage in conservation <strong>of</strong> soil health and with an aim to increase<br />
the production and productivity <strong>of</strong> finger millet, this experiment was conducted to standardize<br />
the fertilizer management technology <strong>of</strong> finger millet under zero tillage.<br />
Methodology<br />
The field experiment was conducted for three rabi seasons at Agricultural Research Station,<br />
Vizianagaram, Andhra Pradesh from, 2017 to 2019. The soil was sandy clay loam in texture, low<br />
in organic carbon, available nitrogen, high in available phosphorus and medium in available<br />
potassium. The experiment was laid down in Randomized complete block design with ten<br />
treatments replicated thrice. The treatments taken were: T1: 50% RDF, T2: 75% RDF, T3: 100%<br />
RDF, T4: 125% RDF, T5: 150% RDF, T6: T1+ 1% Multi KNO3 Foliar Spray, T7: T2+ 1% Multi<br />
KNO3 Foliar Spray, T8: T3+ 1% Multi KNO3 Foliar Spray, T9: T4+ 1% Multi KNO3 Foliar<br />
Spray, T10: T5+ 1% Multi KNO3 Foliar Spray. The Recommended dose <strong>of</strong> fertilizer (RDF) 60-<br />
40-30 kg NPK/ha <strong>of</strong> finger millet in the North coastal zone <strong>of</strong> Andhra Pradesh. The initial soil<br />
samples final soil samples after harvest <strong>of</strong> the crop were collected, for analysis <strong>of</strong> pH, EC,<br />
available N, P2O5, K2O and available micronutrients viz., Zn, Fe, Cu and Mn as per the standard<br />
procedures.<br />
Results<br />
Different levels <strong>of</strong> NPK fertilizers, influenced the growth and yield <strong>of</strong> finger millet under zero<br />
tillage in rice fallows (Table). The number <strong>of</strong> productive tillers/plant (2.7) and ear head length<br />
(6.79 cm) were found significantly higher in 150% RDF+1% KNO3 foliar spray. However, it<br />
was on par with 125% RDF+1% KNO3 and 150% RDF. These results confirm that higher rate <strong>of</strong><br />
fertilizers had a positive consequence on growth <strong>of</strong> fingermillet. (Sandhya Rani et al., 2017).<br />
Nutrient management in finger millet (variety, VR 847) in rice fallows under zero tillage showed<br />
that grain yield <strong>of</strong> finger millet was significantly higher (2830 kg/ha) in 150 % RDF NPK<br />
fertilizers over 100% RDF NPK fertilizers (2289 kg/ha) and was on par with 125% RDF NPK<br />
fertilizers (2602 kg/ha). Spraying <strong>of</strong> 1% KNO3 at flower initiation stage helped in further<br />
increase in grain yield. The yield increases due to spraying <strong>of</strong> 1% KNO3 was found to be 0.9 %<br />
657 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
at 50% RDF, 2.1 at 75% RDF, 2.6 at 100% RDF, 2.6 at 125% RDF and 3.3 at 150% RDF<br />
fertilizers and this may be due to more and rapid flower initiation and early vigor that resulted in<br />
more no. <strong>of</strong> productive tillers, bigger size ear heads and long finger length <strong>of</strong> finger millet.<br />
Significant yield reduction was observed at lower levels <strong>of</strong> fertilizers. but earliness in maturity<br />
was observed in these lower levels <strong>of</strong> fertilized plots. Higher Benefit: Cost ratio (2.53) (Table)<br />
was observed with 150%RDF + spraying <strong>of</strong> 1% KNO3. These results are in conformity with<br />
Nigade et al., 2013 and Sandhya Rani, et al., 2017.<br />
The physicochemical properties <strong>of</strong> the soil (pH and E.C) (Table 2), and organic carbon was non<br />
significant with the application <strong>of</strong> different nutrient management practices. Post-harvest soil<br />
analysis showed that soil available nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium were significantly<br />
influenced by different nutrient management practices. The maximum soil available nitrogen,<br />
phosphorus and potassium after harvest <strong>of</strong> the crop was recorded with 150 % RDF + 1% KNO3<br />
spray (270 and 76 kg/ha respectively) whereas soil available micronutrients showed no<br />
significant difference between the treatments. (Rurinda et al. 2014).<br />
References<br />
Nigade, R.D., and More, S.M., 2013. Performance <strong>of</strong> finger millet varieties to different levels <strong>of</strong><br />
fertilizer on yield and soil properties in sub-montane zone <strong>of</strong> Maharashtra. Int. J. Agric.<br />
Sci. 9(1):256-259<br />
Rurinda, J., Mapfumo, P., Van Wijk, M. T., Mtambanengwe, F., Rufino, M. C., Chikowo, R. and<br />
Giller, K. E. 2014. Comparative assessment <strong>of</strong> maize, finger millet and sorghum for<br />
household food security in the face <strong>of</strong> increasing climatic risk. European J <strong>of</strong> Agron. 55<br />
(4):29–41.<br />
Sandhya Rani, Y. Triveni, U. Patro, T.S.S.K. and Anuradha, N. 2017. Effect <strong>of</strong> nutrient<br />
management on yield and quality <strong>of</strong> finger millet (Eleusine coracana (L.) Gaertn. Int J.<strong>of</strong><br />
Chem Studies. 5(6):1211-1216<br />
658 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Yield and Yield attributes as influenced by nutrient management in rice fallow ragi<br />
(variety, VR 847) in rice fallows under zero tillage conditions<br />
Treatment<br />
Plant<br />
height<br />
(cm)<br />
No. <strong>of</strong><br />
productive<br />
tillers/<br />
plant<br />
Boot<br />
leaf<br />
length<br />
(cm)<br />
Ear<br />
head<br />
length<br />
(cm)<br />
No. <strong>of</strong><br />
fingers/Ear<br />
head<br />
Grain<br />
yield<br />
(kg/ha)<br />
Straw<br />
yield<br />
(kg/ha)<br />
B:C<br />
T 1: 50% RDF NPK 81.1 1.7 33.8 5.03 5.47 2129 5321 2.08<br />
T 2: 75% RDF NPK 82.5 1.8 33.9 5.53 5.80 2165 5477 2.08<br />
T 3: 100% RDF NPK 85.9 2.1 37.1 6.07 6.20 2289 6043 2.14<br />
T 4: 125% RDF NPK 87.5 2.4 37.4 6.13 6.33 2602 6787 2.36<br />
T 5: 150% RDF NPK 91.3 2.6 40.7 6.53 5.93 2830 7385 2.48<br />
T 6: T1+ 1% KNO 3 spray 84.0 2.1 35.6 6.03 6.13 2189 5582 2.10<br />
T 7: T2+ 1% KNO 3 spray 85.5 2.3 37.9 6.00 6.27 2244 5746 2.08<br />
T 8: T3+ 1% KNO 3 spray 86.2 2.5 35.9 6.13 6.33 2389 6163 2.15<br />
T 9: T4+ 1% KNO 3 spray 89.2 2.5 37.0 6.48 6.37 2778 7222 2.42<br />
T 10: T5+ 1% KNO 3 spray 89.8 2.7 37.6 6.79 6.40 2981 7811 2.53<br />
Mean 86.3 2.27 36.7 6.07 6.12 2461 6354<br />
SEm± 3.25 0.20 1.72 0.27 0.36 128.8 333.2<br />
C.D. (0.05) NS 0.38 NS 0.58 NS 372.6 963.7<br />
C.V. (%) 6.52 15.4 8.14 7.71 10.28 9.07 9.08<br />
* Significant at 0.05<br />
T4a-41P-1304<br />
Partial Substitution <strong>of</strong> Nutrients through Gliricidia Green Manuring under<br />
Conservation Tillage, a Cost-Effective Alternative for Soil Quality, Productivity<br />
and Economic Sustainability in Rainfed Cotton in Vertisols <strong>of</strong> Central India<br />
B. A. Sonune*, V. K. Kharche, V. V. Gabhane, S. D. Jadhao, S. M. Bhoyar, D. V. Mali,<br />
D. N. Nalge and R. N. Katkar<br />
Dr. Panjabrao Deshmukh Krishi Vidyapeeth, Akola- 444 104(Maharashtra)<br />
*basonune@gmail.com<br />
Cotton is one <strong>of</strong> the important cash crops and plays a vital role in the economy <strong>of</strong> the farmer as<br />
well as the country. Vidarbha is a major cotton and cotton-based cropping system growing<br />
region in central India where it is grown predominantly as a rainfed crop on medium to deep<br />
Vertisols. The low content <strong>of</strong> soil organic carbon in Vertisols in addition to low availability <strong>of</strong> N,<br />
P, and Zn resulted in unsustainable productivity <strong>of</strong> cotton and cotton–based cropping systems<br />
(Blaise et al. 2005) thereby deteriorating soil health. In the present conditions, the continuously<br />
659 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
increasing prices <strong>of</strong> fertilizers made it necessary to minimize the expenses on fertilizers by using<br />
alternative sources like farmyard manure, crop residues, and green manuring along with reduced<br />
tillage practices for sustaining the crop yields and soil fertility. These practices not only increase<br />
crop yield but also improve the physical, chemical, and biological properties <strong>of</strong> soil. When<br />
integrated nutrient management through chemical fertilizers and different organic sources is<br />
applied on a long-term basis, they show a beneficial impact on soil quality (Swarup 2010). As<br />
the availability <strong>of</strong> FYM is scarce and it becomes necessary to find out suitable alternative<br />
sources in the form <strong>of</strong> organic, the present study was carried out to assess the partial substitution<br />
<strong>of</strong> gliricidia green manuring, crop residues, and FYM under conservation and conventional<br />
tillage on cotton productivity, pr<strong>of</strong>itability, and soil quality in Vertisols.<br />
Methodology<br />
The present study was conducted at the research farm <strong>of</strong> the Department <strong>of</strong> Soil Science and<br />
Agril. Chemistry, Dr. Panjabrao Deshmukh Krishi Vidyapeeth, Akola during 2011-12 to 15-16<br />
to assess the integrated effect <strong>of</strong> tillage practices, organic sources, and chemical fertilizers on<br />
productivity, the pr<strong>of</strong>itability <strong>of</strong> rainfed cotton and fertility <strong>of</strong> Vertisol. The experiment<br />
comprised eight treatments including 100 % recommended dose <strong>of</strong> fertilizers (60:30:30 NPK kg<br />
ha -1 ) and the various combinations integrating 50 and 25% N through FYM, wheat straw,<br />
gliricidia green leaf manuring, and compensation <strong>of</strong> RDF to cotton. The experiment was laid out<br />
in randomized block design with two sets <strong>of</strong> conditions namely, conservation and conventional<br />
tillage replicated thrice. The experimental soil was clay in texture, deep to very deep, and<br />
classified as Typic Haplusterts (Vertisol), moderately alkaline in reaction, low in available N,<br />
medium in P, and high in available potassium.<br />
Results<br />
The pooled results revealed that the application <strong>of</strong> 50 % N through FYM + compensation <strong>of</strong> RDF<br />
through chemical fertilizers recorded significantly highest seed cotton yield (13.54 q ha -1 ) which was at<br />
par with the application <strong>of</strong> 50 % N through GLM + compensation <strong>of</strong> RDF through chemical fertilizers<br />
(12.94 q ha -1 ). A significant increase in seed cotton yield was observed under conservation tillage as<br />
compared to conventional tillage. The higher SYI (0.71) was observed with the application <strong>of</strong> 50% N<br />
through FYM + remaining RD through chemical fertilizers followed by 50% N through GLM +<br />
remaining RD through chemical fertilizers (0.68). The lower SYI was observed in 100 % RDF through<br />
chemical fertilizers. The highest NMR and B: C ratio (Rs. 23,656 ha -1 & 2.09) was obtained due to the<br />
application <strong>of</strong> 50 % N through GLM + compensation <strong>of</strong> RDF through chemical fertilizers. The<br />
significant improvement in the physical properties <strong>of</strong> soil was noticed due to the application <strong>of</strong> 50 % N<br />
through GLM + compensation <strong>of</strong> RDF through chemical fertilizers which was at par with the<br />
660 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
application <strong>of</strong> 50 % N through FYM + compensation <strong>of</strong> RDF through chemical fertilizers. A<br />
significantly higher improvement in soil physical properties was observed under conservation tillage<br />
compared to conventional tillage. The soil organic carbon was increased to the tune <strong>of</strong> 10.68 and 6.25<br />
% over the initial value (5.6 g kg -1 ) with 50 % N through FYM + remaining compensation RDF<br />
through chemical fertilizers and 50 % through GLM + remaining compensation RDF through chemical<br />
fertilizers, respectively. The residual soil fertility was significantly higher under the application <strong>of</strong> 50<br />
% N through GLM + compensation <strong>of</strong> RDF through chemical fertilizers which was at par with the<br />
application <strong>of</strong> 50 % N through FYM + compensation <strong>of</strong> RDF through chemical fertilizers. The<br />
application <strong>of</strong> 50 % N through GLM + compensation <strong>of</strong> RDF through chemical fertilizers recorded<br />
significant improvement in biological properties (SMBC, SMBN, and DHA) <strong>of</strong> soil which was on par<br />
with the application <strong>of</strong> 50 % N through FYM + compensation <strong>of</strong> RDF through chemical fertilizers. A<br />
significant increase in the biological properties <strong>of</strong> soil was observed under conservation tillage as<br />
compared to conventional tillage. The SQI was improved with the application <strong>of</strong> 50% N through FYM<br />
and the remaining RD through chemical fertilizers (2.29). The SQI was comparatively lower in 100%<br />
RDF indicating the application <strong>of</strong> RDF alone could not maintain soil quality and as a result, seed<br />
cotton and cotton stalk yield was reduced in Vertisols. The compensation <strong>of</strong> chemical fertilizers<br />
through various organic sources viz., gliricidia green leaf manuring, and green manuring with sunhemp<br />
and wheat straw were found equally effective in maintaining higher SQI.<br />
Conclusion<br />
The results <strong>of</strong> the present study indicate that continuous application <strong>of</strong> 50 % N through FYM with<br />
remaining RD from mineral fertilizers sustained the cotton productivity and SYI index with<br />
improvement in soil properties. However, the substitution <strong>of</strong> 50 % N through gliricidia green leaf<br />
manuring with remaining RD from chemical fertilizers was found equally beneficial for sustaining<br />
cotton productivity, SYI, improvement in soil health as well as enhancing net returns <strong>of</strong> cotton in<br />
rainfed Vertisols <strong>of</strong> semi-arid climatic conditions in Central India.<br />
References<br />
Blaise, D., Majumdar, G. and Tekale, K.U. 2005. On-farm evaluation <strong>of</strong> fertilizer application and<br />
conservation tillage on productivity <strong>of</strong> cotton + pigeonpea strip intercropping on rainfed<br />
Vertisols <strong>of</strong> Central India. Soil Till. Res.84: 108-117.<br />
Swarup, Anand 2010. Integrated plant nutrient supply and management strategies for enhancing<br />
soil quality, input use efficiency and crop productivity. J. Indian Soc. Soil Sci.58:25-31.<br />
661 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Effect <strong>of</strong> tillage and integrated nutrient management on productivity, pr<strong>of</strong>itability <strong>of</strong><br />
rainfed cotton<br />
(a) Tillage<br />
Cotton yield<br />
(q ha -1 )<br />
Seed<br />
Cotton<br />
Cotton<br />
Stalk<br />
SYI<br />
NMR<br />
(Rs.<br />
ha -1 )<br />
B:C<br />
ratio<br />
BD<br />
(Mg<br />
m -3 )<br />
HC<br />
(cm hr -<br />
1 )<br />
MWD<br />
OC<br />
(g kg -1 )<br />
Conservation tillage 12.49 29.22 0.61 19105 1.82 1.35 0.72 0.70 5.86<br />
Conventional tillage 11.73 26.33 0.61 14185 1.56 1.35 0.70 0.66 5.74<br />
SE (m) 0.13 0.22 --- 393 0.01 0.01 0.006 0.007 0.04<br />
CD at 5 % 0.39 0.65 -- 1152 0.04 NS 0.017 0.021 0.11<br />
T1-100% RDF 11.19 25.95 0.55 19429 2.02 1.37 0.65 0.64 5.53<br />
T2-50 % RDF + in situ GM 11.68 27.44 0.61 19917 1.96 1.36 0.69 0.69 5.93<br />
T3-50% N through FYM 13.54 31.79 0.71 15694 1.49 1.31 0.77 0.73 6.17<br />
T4-50% N through WS 11.89 26.73 0.62 11604 1.38 1.36 0.74 0.68 5.84<br />
T5-50% N through GLM 12.94 28.63 0.68 23656 2.09 1.34 0.74 0.70 5.95<br />
T6-25% N through FYM +<br />
25% N through WS<br />
T7-25% N through FYM +<br />
25% N through GLM<br />
T8-25% N through WS + 25%<br />
N through GLM<br />
11.94 27.42<br />
11.95 27.23<br />
11.76 27.02<br />
0.58 11604 1.37<br />
0.60 15709 1.60<br />
0.57 15545 1.60<br />
1.36 0.70 0.67 5.68<br />
1.34 0.70 0.68 5.68<br />
1.36 0.69 0.64 5.63<br />
SE (m) 0.27 0.44 -- 785 0.01 0.01 0.014 0.08<br />
CD at 5 % 0.78 1.28 -- 2304 0.04 0.03 0.042 0.22<br />
(c)Interaction effect NS NS NS NS NS NS<br />
Note: In T3 to T8, the remaining recommended dose <strong>of</strong> fertilizer was compensated through<br />
chemical fertilizers, in T2 in situ green manurings was done through sunhemp<br />
T4a-42P-1047<br />
Performance <strong>of</strong> Castor to Different Levels <strong>of</strong> Nitrogen and Phosphorus under<br />
Conserved Soil Moisture in Ghed Area <strong>of</strong> Gujarat<br />
D. S. Hirpara * , R. B. Thanki, V. D. Vora, S. C. Kaneriya and P. D. Vekariya<br />
Main Dry Farming Research Station, Junagadh Agricultural University, Gujarat, 360 023 India<br />
*dshirpara@jau.in<br />
Castor (Racinus communis) is an important non-edible oilseed crop <strong>of</strong> the arid and semi arid<br />
regions <strong>of</strong> India due to its extensive deep root system and can be grown successfully under<br />
rainfed or irrigated conditions. India, Brazil and China are the most important castor growing<br />
countries in the World. India is the global leader in the production and trade <strong>of</strong> castor having<br />
662 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
7.51 lakh hectare area and 11.97 lakh tonnes production with a productivity <strong>of</strong> 1592 kg/ha during<br />
2019 (FAOSTAT, 2019). Gujarat is the largest castor growing state <strong>of</strong> India. Where, it’s grown<br />
over an area <strong>of</strong> 5.22 lakh hectare with the annual production <strong>of</strong> 9.44 lakh tonnes with average<br />
productivity <strong>of</strong> about 1809 kg/ha and its shares about 69.46% <strong>of</strong> the total area and 78.90% <strong>of</strong> the<br />
total castor production. Cultivation <strong>of</strong> castor on conserved soil moisture in Ghed area <strong>of</strong> Gujarat<br />
is increased day by day. While, castor is drought tolerant plant and can be grown on wide<br />
climatic regimes and is an ideal crop for arid and semi-arid zones with humid climate (Falasca et<br />
al., 2012), proper planting geometry (Thanki et al., 2020) and the availability <strong>of</strong> balanced<br />
nutrients is very necessary for high yield. Therefore, it is prime need to find out appropriate dose<br />
<strong>of</strong> nitrogen and phosphorus for castor grown under conserved moisture in Ghed area <strong>of</strong> Gujarat.<br />
Hence, an experiment was planned to study the effect <strong>of</strong> nitrogen and phosphorus on castor yield<br />
under conserved soil moisture in Ghed area.<br />
Methodology<br />
A field experiment was conducted during the Semi-rabi season <strong>of</strong> 2015 to 2019 at Dry Farming<br />
Research Station, Junagadh Agricultural University, Ratia (Porbandar). The soil <strong>of</strong> experimental<br />
field was medium black clayey having pH 8.26, EC 0.41 dS m -1 and organic carbon 0.52 %. The<br />
soil was medium in available nitrogen (255 kg/ha), medium in available phosphorus (43.27<br />
kg/ha) and high in available potash (690.0 kg/ha). The experiment was laid out in a factorial<br />
randomized block design with 12 treatments. 4 levels <strong>of</strong> nitrogen (0, 20, 40 and 60 kg/ha) and 3<br />
levels <strong>of</strong> phosphorus (0, 20 and 40 kg/ha) with 3 replications. The nitrogen was applied in two<br />
splits viz., 50 % as basal through ammonium sulphate and 50 % as top dressing at 45-50 DAS<br />
through urea by drilling in soil up to 10 cm depth, while phosphorus was applied as basal<br />
through single super phosphate as per treatments. The Gross and net plot size was 5.4 m X 4.5 m<br />
and 3.6 m X 2.7 m, respectively. Castor GCH-7 was sown at the distance <strong>of</strong> 90 cm X 45 cm on<br />
27 August 2015, 24 October 2016, 27 October 2017, 19 September 2018 and 9 November 2019<br />
under conserved soil moisture. The total rainfall received during the crop season (June to<br />
November) was 180, 306, 270, 149 and 545 mm in 6, 12, 14, 8 and 18 rainy days in the year <strong>of</strong><br />
2015 2016, 2017, 2018 and 2019, respectively. Data on growth, yield performance and economic<br />
<strong>of</strong> castor was pooled over 5 years.<br />
Results<br />
On the basis <strong>of</strong> five years pooled mean, seed and stalk yield <strong>of</strong> castor were significantly<br />
influenced due to different levels <strong>of</strong> nitrogen and phosphorus, while plant height was found nonsignificant<br />
(Table). Significantly highest seed yield and stalk yield <strong>of</strong> castor were recorded with<br />
application <strong>of</strong> 60 kg N/ha as compared to control, 20 and 40 kg N/ha. Among phosphorus levels,<br />
663 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
application <strong>of</strong> 40 kg P2O5/ha recorded significantly highest seed and stalk yield <strong>of</strong> castor as<br />
compared to control, but it was at par with application <strong>of</strong> 20 kg P2O5/ha. Similarly maximum net<br />
returns <strong>of</strong> Rs. 10081/ha and B: C ratio <strong>of</strong> 1.51 were recorded with application <strong>of</strong> 60 kg N/ha.<br />
While among phosphorus levels, maximum net returns <strong>of</strong> Rs. 7814/ha and B: C ratio <strong>of</strong> 1.40<br />
were recorded with 40 kg P2O5/ha followed by Rs. 7109/ha and B: C ratio <strong>of</strong> 1.37 with<br />
application <strong>of</strong> 20 kg P2O5/ha.<br />
Growth, yield and economics <strong>of</strong> castor as influenced by nitrogen and phosphorus levels<br />
under conserved soil moisture (Pooled mean <strong>of</strong> 5 years)<br />
Treatments<br />
Nitrogen (kg/ha)<br />
Phosphorus (kg/ha)<br />
Conclusion<br />
On the basis <strong>of</strong> five years pooled results, it can concluded that higher seed yield and net returns<br />
from castor (GCH-7) can be obtained with application <strong>of</strong> 60 kg N and 40 kg P2O5/ha in medium<br />
black clayey soil under conserved soil moisture in Ghed area <strong>of</strong> Gujarat.<br />
References<br />
Falasca, S. L., Ulberich, A. C., and Ulberich, E., 2012. Developing an agro-climatic zoning<br />
model to determine potential production areas for castor bean (Ricinus communis L.). Ind.<br />
Crops and Prod. 40, 185-191.<br />
Plant height<br />
(cm)<br />
Seed<br />
yield<br />
(kg/ha)<br />
Stalk<br />
yield<br />
(kg/ha)<br />
Net<br />
return<br />
( /ha)<br />
B:C ratio<br />
Control 56.4 597 1242 3947 1.21<br />
20 59.1 647 1309 5372 1.28<br />
40 60.2 731 1461 7993 1.41<br />
60 60.8 799 1631 10081 1.51<br />
SEm+ 1.5 18 44<br />
CD (P=0.05) NS 54 136<br />
Control 58.0 648 1340 5604 1.30<br />
20 59.4 701 1423 7109 1.37<br />
40 60.0 731 1471 7814 1.40<br />
SEm+ 0.7 11 23<br />
CD (P=0.05) NS 49 124<br />
664 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
FAOSTAT. 2019. Statistical databases and data-sets <strong>of</strong> the Food and Agriculture Organization <strong>of</strong><br />
the United Nations [Available at URL: http://faostat.fao.org; accessed on 1 st June, 2021].<br />
Thanki, R. B., Hirpara, D. S., Vora, V. D., Vekariya, P. D., Jotangiya, K. S., Vadar, H. R., Kaneria,<br />
S. C. and Modhavadiya, V. L. (2020). Effect <strong>of</strong> plant geometry on castor under conserved<br />
moisture condition at Ratia (Ghed), Gujarat. J. Pharmacogon. and Phytochem, Sp. 9, (5):<br />
831-833.<br />
T4a-43P-1289<br />
Performance <strong>of</strong> Maize (Zea mays) under late Planting Conditions in Organic<br />
Production Mode in the Rainfed Condition <strong>of</strong> Meghalaya<br />
Amit A. Shahane and U. K. Behera<br />
College <strong>of</strong> Agriculture (CAU-I), Kyrdemkulai, Meghalaya, India, 793105<br />
Maize (Zea mays) has bright prospects in Meghalaya state due to its significant role in catering to<br />
the need for animal feed requirement both in green form as forage, dry form as fodder, and use <strong>of</strong><br />
grains in preparation <strong>of</strong> concentration. The farming system in Meghalaya in particular and North<br />
East Hill region in general is animal based. Most <strong>of</strong> these animals need feed in large quantities.<br />
Maize can be a dual crop with the introduction <strong>of</strong> baby corn and sweet corn providing a good<br />
source <strong>of</strong> green fodder along with economic productivity. Besides that, crop productivity is<br />
conditioned by several factors such as nutrient sensitivity considering its high productivity and<br />
nutrient requirement, and water sensitivity due to its susceptibility to waterlogging and deficit<br />
water stress. Meeting these requirements in the organic production system in areas with higher<br />
rainfall is challenging. In Meghalaya, the organic production system is commonly followed, and<br />
average rainfall varies between 2119 mm to 6019 mm per annum. Considering this, it needs to<br />
access the potential <strong>of</strong> maize for nutrient and water stress with organic sources <strong>of</strong> crop nutrition.<br />
With this background, a field experiment was planned to study the growth repose <strong>of</strong> maize to the<br />
application <strong>of</strong> Pongamia oilseed cake and poultry manure in acidic soil with an organic<br />
production system in late planting conditions.<br />
Methodology<br />
A field experiment was conducted at the Instructional Farm <strong>of</strong> the College <strong>of</strong> Agriculture (CAU-<br />
I), Kyrdemkulai, Meghalaya (25 0 74’ N latitude, 91 0 81’ E longitude and 700 meters above mean<br />
sea level) in the Kharif season <strong>of</strong> 2021-22. The climate <strong>of</strong> the selected area is subtropical with<br />
average seasonal (June to September) and annual rainfall <strong>of</strong> 1424.1 mm and 2119.3 mm,<br />
respectively. The study was planned in randomized block design with 11 treatments consisting <strong>of</strong><br />
665 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
two sources <strong>of</strong> crop nutrition viz., poultry manure and Pongamia oilseed cake, three level <strong>of</strong> crop<br />
nutrition 25 %, 50%, and 100 % recommended dose <strong>of</strong> nitrogen (120 kg N/ha) and their various<br />
combinations. The land was cleared <strong>of</strong>f from forest vegetation in 2019 and sown with oat (Avena<br />
sativa) in the rabi season <strong>of</strong> 2019; while in 2020-21 field was planted with a Maize–Pea–Linseed<br />
cropping system. Maize variety DA-61-A was used while the crop was grown as rainfed. For<br />
recording the observations, plant population was counted two times (60 DAS and at harvest);<br />
while plants with tassel and cob were counted at harvest. Three plants from each plot were<br />
randomly selected for dry matter partitioning measurement and separated into stem, leaf, root,<br />
tassel, and cob. The dry matter accumulation in these parts was measured by sun drying followed<br />
by oven drying at 60 ± 2 0 C temperature till constant weight was achieved.<br />
Results<br />
Plant population both at 60 DAS and at harvest was reduced drastically. At 60 days after sowing,<br />
the mortality percentage varies between 36 to 68 %; while at harvest, it varies from 46 to 72 %.<br />
In both cases, plant mortality was highest in control and lowest in poultry manure (100 % N) +<br />
Pongamia cake (50 % N) indicating the nutrient stress as one potential reason. The development<br />
<strong>of</strong> a strong root system and foliage and the increase in strength <strong>of</strong> plants to stresses are the<br />
possible reasons for reduced mortality in manure-applied treatments. This higher mortality<br />
indicates that, though the window <strong>of</strong> sowing maize is considered wider, the crop performance is<br />
not uniform across the window <strong>of</strong> sowing. At the same time, plant stresses affecting crop growth<br />
also vary across the window. Besides survival, the plant’s capacity to attend the reproductive<br />
growth is also affected significantly by both planting time and nutrient endowments. Out <strong>of</strong> the<br />
total plants that survived, 71–94% bear tassel; while 50–68 % bear cob. If expressed as a percent<br />
<strong>of</strong> the expected ideal plant population, then 20–48 % and 14–28 % <strong>of</strong> plants bear tassel and cob,<br />
respectively. Late planting leads to plant mortality and the application <strong>of</strong> manure is having to<br />
alleviate the effect on plant mortality. The impact <strong>of</strong> sowing time on the growth and productivity<br />
<strong>of</strong> maize was reported by Srivastava et al. (2022); while Ghosh et al. (2020) signifies the role <strong>of</strong><br />
manure application in crop growth. Plant height and dry matter partitioning were affected<br />
significantly due to both late planting and manure application rate; while the source <strong>of</strong> manure<br />
application didn’t show any significant variation in plant growth and development. The dry<br />
matter production at harvest varies from 21.3 to 42.0 g/plant with the highest and lowest in PM<br />
(100 % N) + Pongamia cake (50 % N) and control, respectively. The increase in the total dry<br />
matter at harvest due to the application <strong>of</strong> 25 %, 50 %, and 100 % poultry manure over control in<br />
6.5, 13.8, and 19.8 g/plant, respectively; while the same for Pongamia cake is 6.7, 13.4, and 19.7<br />
g/plant. The combined application <strong>of</strong> PM (50 % N) + Pongamia cake (50 % N) and PM (100 %<br />
N) + Pongamia cake (100 % N) remain on par in total dry matter production at harvest,<br />
666 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
indicating that, a higher rate <strong>of</strong> manure application will not be a viable option for alleviating the<br />
effect <strong>of</strong> reducing the stress raised due to late planting; while splitting <strong>of</strong> nutrient application<br />
across the crop growth cycle and attempt for reducing the mortality <strong>of</strong> plant by earthing up, gap<br />
filling and protection <strong>of</strong> seed being eaten by soil insect by treating with biodynamic formulation<br />
need to be stressed. Out <strong>of</strong> total dry matter accumulation, 46.2 – 48.6 % is accumulated in cobs;<br />
while 19.6 – 22.0 % is accumulated in shoots and both contribute 67 – 68 % to the total dry<br />
matter accumulation.<br />
Conclusion<br />
Our result showed that the application <strong>of</strong> manure higher than 100 % N (120 kg N/ha) do not<br />
produce any significantly higher growth; while increasing the rate <strong>of</strong> application from 25 to 100<br />
% significantly increase the dry matter production in all part <strong>of</strong> the plant at harvest. Application<br />
<strong>of</strong> manure through different sources (poultry manure and Pongamia cake) and their combinations<br />
do not show any significant effect on the growth and survival <strong>of</strong> maize.<br />
References<br />
Srivastava, R.K., Mequanint, F., Chakraborty, A., Panda, R.K. and Halder, D. 2022.<br />
Augmentation <strong>of</strong> maize yield by strategic adaptation to cope with climate change for a<br />
future period in Eastern India. J. Clean. Prod. 339:130599,<br />
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.130599.<br />
Ghosh, D., Brahmachari, K., Skalicky, M., Hossain, A., Sarkar, S., Dinda, N.K., Das, A.,<br />
Pramanick, B., Moulick, D., Brestic, M., and Raza, M.A. 2020. Nutrient supplementation<br />
through organic manures influence the growth <strong>of</strong> weeds and maize productivity. Molecules,<br />
25(21): 4924, https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25214924.<br />
T4a-44P -1155<br />
Response <strong>of</strong> Soybean (Glycine Max (L).) to the Organic Sources <strong>of</strong> Nutrients<br />
A. K. Gore, A. K. Kadam, P. O. Bhutada and S. A. Jawale<br />
Organic Farming Research and Training Centre, Vasantrao Naik Marathwada Krishi Vidyapeeth,<br />
Parbhani - 431402 (Maharashtra) India<br />
<strong>of</strong>rtcvnmkvparbhani@gmail.com<br />
Soybean is important kharif crop in rainfed areas <strong>of</strong>Marathwada region, where 87 % area is<br />
under rainfed condition. The crop has ability to fix atmospheric nitrogen through the symbiotic<br />
bacteria called Rhizobia within the nodules <strong>of</strong> their root systems as it belongs to leguminceae<br />
family. The microbiology <strong>of</strong> the soil is interrelated with the organic carbon content <strong>of</strong> the soil.<br />
667 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Due to want <strong>of</strong> improvement in soil health and production <strong>of</strong> residue free food, organic sources<br />
<strong>of</strong> nutrients are intentionally being used by farmers in recent past. Application <strong>of</strong> organic<br />
manures has direct effect on the crop yield and properties <strong>of</strong> soil. Keeping this in view, a field<br />
experiment was conducted to evaluate locally available organic sources <strong>of</strong> nutrients in terms <strong>of</strong><br />
yield <strong>of</strong> soybean crop (Aheret al. 2019).<br />
Methodology<br />
An experiment was conducted at Organic Farming Research and Training Centre, Vasantrao<br />
Naik Marathwada Krishi Vidyapeeth Parbhani, during kharif 2018-19. The experiment design<br />
was RBD for thirteen treatments with three replications with gross plot size <strong>of</strong> 7.2 m x 6.0 mand<br />
net plot size <strong>of</strong> 6.3 m x 5.4 m and with 45 x 05 cm spacing.<br />
Results<br />
Soybean yield was determined by the development <strong>of</strong> the plant from the beginning <strong>of</strong> sowing to<br />
the harvest period, where the role <strong>of</strong> fertilization was <strong>of</strong> great importance. Application <strong>of</strong><br />
different organic and chemical fertilizers would affect one or all <strong>of</strong> its yield components. Among<br />
nutrient source applications, the chemical fertilizer as RDF with FYMthe treatment, T13 i.e. RDF<br />
+ FYM @ 5 t ha -1 recorded the highest soybean yield which was found significantly superior<br />
over rest <strong>of</strong> the treatments. However, use <strong>of</strong> organic sources <strong>of</strong> nutrient affected soybean yield<br />
and data revealed that, the effect <strong>of</strong> various organic sources on soybean yield was found to be<br />
significant. Among various organic sources <strong>of</strong> nutrients, the treatment T2 i.e.100 % RDN through<br />
Vermi compost recorded highest soybean yield (1546 Kg ha -1. Similar trend was observed in<br />
GMR, NMR and B:C ratio i.e. T13 i.e. RDF + FYM 5 t ha -1 recorded the highest GMR, NMR and<br />
B:C ratio. However, among various sources <strong>of</strong> nutrients the treatmentT2 i.e. 100 % RDN through<br />
Vermicompost recorded the higher seed yield <strong>of</strong> soybean with higher GMR, NMR and B:C ratio<br />
than rest <strong>of</strong> the treatments. Similar trend was observed and reported by Channabasavana et al.,<br />
2001. The treatments had RWUE <strong>of</strong> more than one except the control plotsand it was found<br />
highest in treatment T13 followed by T2. The positive effects <strong>of</strong> organic manure application on<br />
performance <strong>of</strong> soybean and other crops in black soils are well documented by Aher et al. 2015.<br />
668 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Soybean crop yield, monetary returns, B:C ratio and rain water use efficiency as<br />
influenced by different treatments.<br />
Treatments<br />
Soybea<br />
n Yield<br />
(Kg/ha)<br />
GMR<br />
(₹/ha)<br />
NMR<br />
(₹/ha)<br />
B:C<br />
ratio<br />
RWUE<br />
(kg/mm<br />
/ha)<br />
T 1: 100 % RDN through FYM 954 32438 3838 1.13 1.70<br />
T 2: 100 % RDN through Vermicompost (VC) 1546 52549 13749 1.35 2.75<br />
T 3: 100 % RDN through 33% FYM + 33% VC + 33%<br />
NC<br />
1337 45433 9666 1.27 2.38<br />
T 4: 100 % RDN: FYM + JA 3 at 30, 45 & 60 DAS 1204 40930 9780 1.31 2.14<br />
T 5: 75 % RDN: FYM + JA 3 at 30, 45 & 60 DAS 1055 35843 5893 1.20 1.87<br />
T 6: 50 % RDN: FYM + JA 3 at 30, 45 & 60 DAS 899 30573 1823 1.06 1.60<br />
T 7: 100 % RDN: FYM + Bio fertilizer 2.5 lit/ha (SA) 1123 38182 8487 1.29 2.00<br />
T 8: 75 % RDN: FYM + Bio fertilizer 2.5 lit/ha (SA) 995 33837 5342 1.19 1.77<br />
T 9: 50 % RDN: FYM + Bio fertilizer 2.5 lit/ha (SA) 874 29717 2422 1.09 1.55<br />
T 10: Jivamrut 3 Appln at 30, 45 & 60 DAS 849 28850 2110 1.08 1.51<br />
T 11: Jivamrut 5 Appln at 0, 15, 30, 45 & 60 DAS 926 31472 2772 1.10 1.65<br />
T 12: Control (Without any application) 723 24586 786 1.03 1.29<br />
T 13: RDF + 5 t FYM/ha 2233 75900 43897 2.37 3.97<br />
SE(m) + 70.26 823.7 213.4 -- --<br />
CD at 5% 210.5 2279 638.2 -- --<br />
Mean 1132 38485 8505 1.27 2.01<br />
CV 10.2 9.80 11.2 -- --<br />
Conclusion<br />
Among the nutrient source applications, the chemical fertilizer as RDF with FYM, treatment T13<br />
i.e. RDF + FYM @ 5 t ha -1 recorded the highest soybean yield, GMR, NMR and B:C ratio and<br />
was found significantly superior over rest <strong>of</strong> the treatments. Whereas, among various organic<br />
sources <strong>of</strong> nutrients, treatment T2 i.e.100 % RDN through Vermicompost recorded highest<br />
soybean yield (1546 Kg ha), GMR, NMR and B:C ratio.<br />
669 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
References<br />
Aher, S. B., Lakaria, B. L., Swami, K., Singh, A. B., Ramana, S., Ramesh, K and Thakur, J. K.<br />
2015. Effect <strong>of</strong> organic farming practices on soil and performance <strong>of</strong> soybean (Glycine<br />
max (L.)) under semiarid tropical conditions in central India. Journal <strong>of</strong> Applied and<br />
Natural Science. 7(1): 67–71.<br />
Channabasavana, A.S., Yelamadi, S.G., Biradar, D.P. 2001. Effect <strong>of</strong> organics on seed yield,<br />
quality and storability <strong>of</strong> soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merril). Indian Journal <strong>of</strong> Agronomy<br />
2001.46(33):458-461<br />
Aher, S .B., Brij Lal Lakaria, Singh, A. B. Swami Kaleshananda, Ramana, S., Ramesh, K.,<br />
Thakur, J. K., Rajput, P. S and Yashona, D. S. 2019. Effect <strong>of</strong> organic sources <strong>of</strong><br />
nutrients on performance <strong>of</strong> soybean (glycine max). Indian journal <strong>of</strong> agricultural<br />
sciences. 89 (11): 1787–91.<br />
T4a-45P-1230<br />
Soil Moisture Availability in Alfisol as Influenced by Crop Residue<br />
Application under Minimum Tillage<br />
K. Sammi Reddy, Munna Lal, K. L. Sharma, M. Eshwar, K. Srinivas, A. K. Indoria, and<br />
V. K. Singh<br />
ICAR-Central Research institute for Dryland Agriculture, Santoshnagar, Saidabad Post, Hyderabad –<br />
500059 (T.S.)<br />
The water-holding capacity <strong>of</strong> a soil in a particular place depends on the depth <strong>of</strong> the soil, the<br />
volume <strong>of</strong> pore-spaces, and the proportion <strong>of</strong> the voids that retain water against the pull <strong>of</strong><br />
gravity. In a sandy soil, there is relatively large total volume <strong>of</strong> pore space among the large<br />
mineral particles, but the majority <strong>of</strong> the pores are so large that rainwater drains through most <strong>of</strong><br />
them, and relatively little is retained within the pr<strong>of</strong>ile. In clayey soils, the opposite can be<br />
expected. There may be a large proportion <strong>of</strong> small pore-spaces and while percolating rainwater<br />
may enter partly under capillary action, but the water cannot drain out and can only be removed<br />
by plant roots and/ or by slow evaporation into any air-filled spaces within the soil. In very<br />
compact clay soils, both entry and exit <strong>of</strong> rainwater may be very slow (Indoria et al., 2017). The<br />
presence <strong>of</strong> additional plant residue on the soil surface is one <strong>of</strong> the most prominent features <strong>of</strong><br />
conservation tillage systems when compared with conventional tillage. The surface residue<br />
affects the absorption <strong>of</strong> solar radiation, and decreases the thermal admittance <strong>of</strong> the surface<br />
relative to that <strong>of</strong> bare soil. Soil water storage at many semi-arid locations increased with<br />
670 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
increasing amounts <strong>of</strong> crop residue maintained on the surface (Sharma et al., 1990). Greater<br />
infiltration, less evaporation, and effective weed control contributed to the higher soil water<br />
contents with conservation tillage.<br />
Methodology<br />
To achieve the objective, an experiment with surface application <strong>of</strong> 4 levels <strong>of</strong> sorghum residues<br />
@ 0, 2, 4, 6 t ha -1 in combination with N (30 kg N ha -1 for cowpea and 60 kg N ha -1 for Sorghum<br />
through urea) and uniform dose <strong>of</strong> 30 kg P2O5 ha -1 (through super phosphate) with minimum<br />
tillage, was initiated during 2005 at ICAR-CRIDA Research farm Hayathnagar, Hyderabad. The<br />
cropping system adopted in this study was Sorghum-Cowpea with yearly rotation. The soil<br />
moisture was measured using Soil Moisture Meter (Micro Gopher, Nu-Tech). Soil moisture were<br />
recorded in treatment plots at 8 depths viz., 0-10 cm, 10-20cm, 20-30 cm 30-40 cm, 40-50cm,<br />
50-60 cm, 60-70 cm, 70-80cm. Soil moisture at field capacity (1/3 bars) and permanent wilting<br />
point (15 bars) was measured using pressure plate apparatus. The difference in soil moisture at<br />
field capacity and permanent wilting point was recorded as soil available moisture.<br />
Results<br />
Soil Moisture: It was observed that, during the crop season (June-September), on an average, the<br />
soil moisture at 0-10 cm depth varied from 11.2 to 16.6% across the treatments. The increase in<br />
soil moisture at 0-10 cm depth was 18%, 25%, 49%, with 2, 4 and 6 t ha -1 residue treatments<br />
respectively over control. The soil moisture contents increased with increase in level <strong>of</strong><br />
application <strong>of</strong> residues in all the depths studied (0-80cm). The results pertaining to the effect <strong>of</strong><br />
residue application on soil moisture % (January- April) are given hereunder (Fig.1). It was<br />
observed that the residue applied @ 6t ha -1 (T4) recorded higher soil moisture content at all the<br />
depths studied. At 0-10 cm depth, application <strong>of</strong> residues at 6t ha -1 resulted in highest moisture<br />
storage in the soil compared to other treatments after the harvest <strong>of</strong> the crop. The treatments @ 2,<br />
4 and 6 t ha -1 , on an average recorded 25%, 34% and 57% higher soil moisture contents<br />
respectively over control. It was observed that at 10-20 cm soil depth, on an average, soil<br />
moisture was lower compared to surface soil. At this depth, the residue treated plots stored 27%,<br />
51% and 78% higher moisture compared to no residue treatment. On an average, at 20-30 cm<br />
depth also, residues influenced soil moisture storage. The treatments viz T2, T3 and T4<br />
maintained 47%, 58% and 80% higher soil moisture compared to control. During the first three<br />
weeks and between 11-13 th meteorological weeks, there was no receipt <strong>of</strong> rainfall. Despite non<br />
receipt <strong>of</strong> rainfall, T4 treatment maintained higher soil moisture storage followed by T3 and T2<br />
treatments. The control treatment (no residue) stored the least amount <strong>of</strong> soil moisture.<br />
671 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Soil available moisture capacity: It was observed that soil moisture at field capacity was<br />
significantly influenced by residue treatments and varied from 10.11 to 12.94 cm m -1 .<br />
Significantly higher field capacity (12.94 cm m -1 ) was observed with application <strong>of</strong> sorghum<br />
stover @ 6t ha -1 followed by residue application at 4t ha -1 (11.25 cm m -1 ). Similarly, soil moisture<br />
at permanent wilting point varied from 6.90 to 7.45 cm m -1 . The available water content<br />
increased with the increase in the graded residue levels and it varied from 3.21 to 5.49 cm m -1 .<br />
Significantly higher available water capacity (5.49 cm m -1 ) was observed with application <strong>of</strong><br />
sorghum stover @ 6t ha -1 followed by residue application at 4t ha -1 (3.85 cm m -1 ).<br />
Relationship between soil available moisture and crop yield: In order to establish a relationship<br />
between crop yield and volumetric moisture, a simple linear regression equation was developed<br />
with yield as functional goal and soil moisture as independent variable (Fig. 3). It was observed<br />
that the regression relationship between sorghum grain yield and soil moisture was significant<br />
(p=0.01). The coefficient <strong>of</strong> regression (R 2 = 0.55) denotes that sorghum yield could be explained<br />
by volumetric soil moisture content.<br />
YSorghum yield = 1053.2 + 222.2 (Volumetric Soil Moisture) .........(R 2 = 0.55) **<br />
Conclusion<br />
Relationship between soil available moisture and crop yield<br />
The importance <strong>of</strong> long-term application <strong>of</strong> residues to soil surface in influencing soil moisture<br />
storage. The moisture data also revealed that higher amounts <strong>of</strong> residue application increased soil<br />
moisture storage even beyond 30cm soil depth. At 70-80 cm depth, T2 and T3 treatments<br />
maintained 17% and 26% higher moisture compared to control. On an average, T3 recorded 10%<br />
higher soil moisture storage compared to T2 treatment when all the soil depths were considered.<br />
672 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
The increase in available water content with higher doses <strong>of</strong> surface residue could be attributed<br />
to higher organic C, improved soil structure and consequently more water retention.<br />
References<br />
Indoria, A.K., Sharma, K L., Sammi Reddy, K. and Srinivasa Rao, Ch. 2017. Role <strong>of</strong> soil<br />
physical properties in soil health management and crop productivity in rainfed systems-I:<br />
Soil physical constraints and scope. Current Science, 112 (12):2405-2414.<br />
Sharma, P.K., Kharwara, P.C. and Tewatia, R.K. 1990. Residual soil moisture and wheat in<br />
Regins relation to mulching and tillage during preceding rainfed crop. Soil Tillage Res., 15:<br />
279 284.<br />
T4a-46P-1055<br />
Soil Moisture Stress Alters the Abundance <strong>of</strong> Maize Root Associated Bacteria<br />
M. Manjunath, N. Jyothilakshmi, S. Vijayalakshmi, S. K. Yadav, M. Prabhakar,<br />
K.A. Gopinath, G. Ravindrachary and V.K. Singh<br />
ICAR-Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, Santoshnagar, Hyderabad – 500 059,<br />
Telangana, India.<br />
Plants and microorganisms have coevolved over the years. The plant microbiome comprises <strong>of</strong><br />
rhizospheric, endophytic and epiphytic microorganisms (Rout 2014). Rhizo-microbiome<br />
significantly influences the plant health, growth and productivity (Chaudhari et al. 2020). They<br />
play a vital role in managing various biotic and abiotic stresses. Increased scarcity and<br />
competition for water has become a key threat to food security and poverty alleviation. Drought<br />
considerably changes the composition <strong>of</strong> bacterial and fungal communities indicating that, this<br />
restructured microbiome might help the plant survival under adverse environmental situations<br />
(Santos-Medellin et al. 2017). Thorough knowledge <strong>of</strong> crop specific microbiome would help to<br />
modulate the microbiome in a way that would lead to better growth and development <strong>of</strong> crop<br />
plants (Rascovan et al. 2016). Keeping this in view, a study was conducted to know the effect <strong>of</strong><br />
soil moisture stress on the composition <strong>of</strong> maize root associated bacteria.<br />
Methodology<br />
The total genomic DNA was isolated from 0.25 g soil sample using soil DNA isolation kit. Qubit<br />
4.0 Fluorimeter was used to estimate the DNA concentration. V3-V4 region <strong>of</strong> 16S rRNA<br />
amplified using V3 forward primer and V4 reverse primer. The amplified product was checked<br />
on 2% agarose gel. NEB Next Ultra DNA library preparation kit was used for library<br />
preparation. The prepared libraries were sequenced in Illumina HiSeqplatform for 2x250bp read<br />
673 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
length. Raw sequence data was merged and filtered to get clean data. De novo chimeric<br />
sequences were detected using Vsearch and only non-chimeric sequence were further used. 16S<br />
rRNA sequences were clustered into Operation Taxonomic Units (OTUs) at a similarity cut-<strong>of</strong>f<br />
value <strong>of</strong> 97% using the vsearch program (v2.11.1) and abundance <strong>of</strong> OTUs were recovered using<br />
v-search. OTUs were mapped at 97% sequence identity to an optimized version <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Ribosomal Database Project (RDP) database. Taxonomy was assigned to all identified OTUs<br />
using usearch program (v11.0.667). Sequence <strong>of</strong> OTUs were aligned using mafft (v7.407) and<br />
phylogenetic tree <strong>of</strong> identified OTUs was generated using fasttree (v 2.1.10).<br />
Results<br />
Rhizo-microbiome <strong>of</strong> well-watered and drought stressed plants <strong>of</strong>maize was analyzed by<br />
sequencing V3-V4 region <strong>of</strong> the 16S rRNA gene. Differential abundance <strong>of</strong> bacterial classes was<br />
observed between well watered and drought stressed plants. Alpha Proteobacteria,<br />
Actinobacteria, Bacilli, Beta Proteobacteria, Gamma Proteobacteria and Acidobacteria GP6 were<br />
19.53 %, 10.98 %, 16.67 %, 5.05 %, 4.52 % and 3.81 % respectively in water stressed plants. In<br />
case <strong>of</strong> well watered plants, the classes <strong>of</strong> Alpha Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria, Bacilli, Beta<br />
Proteobacteria, Gamma Proteobacteria and Acidobacteria GP6 were 8.34 %, 6.99 %, 42.09 %,<br />
4.48 %, 3.57 % and 2.07 % respectively .<br />
Differential abundance <strong>of</strong> different classes <strong>of</strong> bacteria in (a) water stressed (b) well watered maize plants<br />
Conclusion<br />
Soil moisture stress altered the relative abundance <strong>of</strong> root associated bacteria <strong>of</strong> maize. There<br />
was an increase in the abundance <strong>of</strong> Alpha Proteobacteria and Actinobacteria under water<br />
stressed conditions as compared to well watered conditions.<br />
References<br />
674 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Chaudhari, D., Rangappa, K., Das, A., Layek, J., Basavaraj, S., Kandpal, B.K., Shouche, Y.,<br />
Rahi, P. 2020. Pea (Pisum sativumL.) Plant shapes its rhizosphere microbiome for<br />
nutrient uptake and stress amelioration in acidic soils <strong>of</strong> the North-East Region <strong>of</strong> India.<br />
Frontiers in Microbiology. 11:968.<br />
Rascovan, N., Carbonetto, B., Perrig, D., DoÂaz, M., Canciani, W., Abalo, M. 2016. Integrated<br />
analysis <strong>of</strong> root microbiomes <strong>of</strong> soybean and wheat from agricultural fields. Scientific<br />
Reports. 6: 280-84.<br />
Rout, M.E. 2014. The plant microbiome. Advances in Botanical Research. 69: 279–309.<br />
Santos-Medellín, C., Edwards, J., Liechty, Z., Nguyen, B., Sundaresan, V. 2017. Drought stress<br />
results in a compartment-specific restructuring <strong>of</strong> the rice root-associated microbiomes.<br />
mBio. 8: e00764-17.<br />
T4a-47P-1196<br />
Soil Organic Carbon Sequestration Potential under the Changing Climatic<br />
Scenarios in Different Agroecosystems <strong>of</strong> India<br />
Nishant K Sinha * , M. Mohanty, J. Somasundaram, Pramod Jha, R. S. Chaudhary,<br />
J. K. Thakur, Dhiraj Kumar, Jitendra Kumar, R. H. Wanjari and A. B. Singh.<br />
ICAR-Indian Institute <strong>of</strong> Soil Science (ICAR-IISS)<br />
Nabibagh, Bhopal-462038<br />
* nishant.sinha76211@gmai.com, nishant.sinha@icar.gov.in<br />
Soil organic matter (SOM) is vital for enhancing soil fertility and sustain crop productivity.<br />
Worldwide, the largest pool <strong>of</strong> terrestrial carbon (C) is contained in soils, and under best<br />
management practices, soils may also have great potential to act as C sinks and assist in climate<br />
change mitigation. However, historic cultivation practices, including tillage, fertilization, and<br />
other management, have exerted significant pressure on agricultural soils' capacity to store and<br />
cycle organic C, leading to reduced soil organic carbon (SOC) stocks. The SOC dynamics in soil<br />
are controlled by complex interactions between various factors such as climate, soil, and<br />
agricultural management practices. We utilized a process-based model, RothC, to simulate longterm<br />
SOC dynamics for rice-based cropping systems under 100% NPK and farmyard manure<br />
management (FYM) practices using the LTFE experiment dataset. The RothC model was<br />
parameterized and validated to predict SOC stock. The validated model was then used to<br />
evaluate the impacts <strong>of</strong> different management practices on SOC dynamics under different<br />
climatic scenarios. The results demonstrated that management practices with FYM have great<br />
675 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
potential to increase SOC sequestration in the rice-based cropping system. The equilibrium SOC<br />
concentration is higher with an integrated application <strong>of</strong> N with FYM. Climate change decreases<br />
the rate <strong>of</strong> SOC sequestration in all the studied agroecosystems, with higher decreases reported<br />
under RCP 8.5, followed by RCP 6.0, RCP 4.5, and RCP 2.6.<br />
T4a-48P-1305<br />
Sustaining Cotton Productivity and Soil Health with Conjoint Use <strong>of</strong> Organic<br />
and Inorganic Sources under Cotton-based Intercropping Systems on<br />
Vertisols in Central India<br />
D. V. Mali, B. A. Sonune, V. K. Kharche, V. V. Gabhane, A.N. Paslawar, S. D. Jadhao,<br />
O. S. Rakhonde, N. M. Konde and D. N. Nalge<br />
Dept. <strong>of</strong> Soil Science and Agril. Chemistry,<br />
Dr. Panjabrao Deshmukh Krishi Vidyapeeth, Akola- 444 104(Maharashtra)<br />
Cotton is one <strong>of</strong> the most important cash crops which plays a key role in the economy <strong>of</strong> farmers.<br />
The nutrient removal by crops is generally more than that supplied through chemical fertilizer<br />
and this negative balance over the year led to low fertility status <strong>of</strong> soil, which resulted in a<br />
decline in the crop yield. Adequate and timely application <strong>of</strong> organic and inorganic fertilizers not<br />
only increases crop yield but also improves the physical, chemical, and biological properties <strong>of</strong><br />
soil. When integrated nutrient management through chemical fertilizers and different organic<br />
sources is applied on a long-term basis, they show a beneficial impact on soil quality (Swarup<br />
2010).The application <strong>of</strong> green manures to soil is considered a good management practice in any<br />
agricultural production system because it stimulates soil microbial growth and their activities,<br />
besides mineralization <strong>of</strong> organically bound plant nutrients, and therefore increases soil fertility<br />
and quality (Doran et al., 1988). Therefore, the present study was carried out to study the effect<br />
<strong>of</strong> conjoint use <strong>of</strong> organic and inorganic sources on soil fertility, chemical properties, and<br />
productivity <strong>of</strong> cotton under cotton-based intercropping systems in Vertisols in the Vidarbha<br />
region <strong>of</strong> Maharashtra, India.<br />
Methodology<br />
The present investigation was conducted at Research Farm, Department <strong>of</strong> Soil Science and<br />
Agricultural Chemistry, Dr. Panjabrao Deshmukh Krishi Vidyapeeth, Akola during the year<br />
2017-18 to 2020-21 on Vertisols. The study has focused on the conjoint effect <strong>of</strong> nutrient<br />
management and a cotton-based intercropping system. The field experiment was comprised <strong>of</strong> the<br />
main plot (nutrient management) and subplot (cotton-based intercropping systems) with three<br />
replications. There are two treatments <strong>of</strong> nutrient management (INM and only organics) and five<br />
676 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
treatments in cotton-based intercropping systems. The nutrient management consists <strong>of</strong> INM<br />
(M1) comprising 75% RDF + compensation through NPS compost, Organic (M2) comprising<br />
100% NPK dose through NPS compost, and cotton-based intercropping systems i.e. Only cotton<br />
(S1), cotton + dhaincha (S2), cotton + sunhemp (S3), cotton + greengram (S4), cotton +<br />
blackgram (S5). The soil is slightly alkaline in reaction (pH 7.76), low in available nitrogen<br />
(195.17 kg N ha -1 ), low in available phosphorus (12.90 kg p ha -1 ), very high in available potash<br />
(368.42 kg K ha -1 ) and has 8.27 mg kg -1 available sulphur and 0.52 mg kg -1 DTPA extractable<br />
zinc.<br />
Results<br />
The significantly higher organic carbon (6.12 g kg -1 ) was observed with the application <strong>of</strong> 100%<br />
nutrients through nitrophosphosulpho (NPS) compost only as compared to nutrients supplied<br />
through integrated nutrient management (5.80 g kg -1 ) i.e. 75% RDF + 25% compensation<br />
through NPS compost as shown in the table. While, under cotton-based intercropping systems,<br />
cotton + dhaincha (1:1) recorded significantly highest organic carbon (6.43 g kg -1 ) followed by<br />
cotton + sunhemp (1:1) (6.18 g kg -1 ) which was found on par with each other. The lowest<br />
organic carbon (5.47 g kg -1 ) was noticed under sole cotton treatment.<br />
The residual soil fertility status in respect <strong>of</strong> available nitrogen (235 kg ha -1 ), phosphorus (21.80<br />
kg ha -1 ), potassium (412 kg ha -1 ), and sulphur (12.73 mg kg -1 ) was increased significantly due to<br />
the application <strong>of</strong> 75 % RDF + 25% compensation through NPS compost as compared to the<br />
application <strong>of</strong> 100% NPK dose through NPS compost (organic only) under nutrient management.<br />
Under the treatments <strong>of</strong> cotton-based intercropping systems, the significantly higher value <strong>of</strong><br />
available N (242 kg ha -1 ), P (23.70 kg ha -1 ), K (418 kg ha -1 ), and S (13.30 mg kg -1 ) was recorded<br />
in the intercropping <strong>of</strong> cotton + dhaincha (1:1) which was at par with the intercropping <strong>of</strong> cotton<br />
+ sunhemp (1:1). The lowest available nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium and sulphur status was<br />
recorded in the treatment <strong>of</strong> sole cotton only. The nutrient management and cotton-based<br />
intercropping system interaction effect was found to be non-significant.<br />
Under the nutrient management, the significantly higher soil microbial biomass carbon (210.41<br />
mg kg -1 ), dehydrogenase activity (46.01 µg g -1 24 hr -1 ) and CO2 evolution (47.59 mg 100 -1 g soil)<br />
were recorded in the treatment receiving 100% RDF through NPS compost as compared to the<br />
nutrients supplied through 75 % RDF + 25% compensation through NPS compost. The<br />
significantly highest SMBC (217.43 mg kg -1 ), dehydrogenase activity (48.91 µg g -1 24 hr -1 ) and<br />
CO2 evolution (52.27 mg 100 -1 g soil) was observed in the intercropping treatment <strong>of</strong> cotton +<br />
dhaincha (1:1) followed by intercropping <strong>of</strong> cotton + sunhemp (1:1) which were on par with each<br />
other. The lowest biological properties were recorded in sole cotton.<br />
677 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
A<br />
Conclusion<br />
Hence, it can be concluded that integrated nutrient management (75 % RDF + Compen. through<br />
NPS compost) and intercropping <strong>of</strong> cotton with dhaincha (1:1) were found superior in sustaining<br />
the cotton productivity and improving chemical and biological properties <strong>of</strong> Vertisol under<br />
rainfed conditions in Vidarbha region <strong>of</strong> central India.<br />
References<br />
Doran, J.W., D.G. Fraser, M.N. Culik and W.C. Liebhardt, 1988. Influence <strong>of</strong> alternative and<br />
conventional agricultural management on soil microbial process and nitrogen.<br />
American Journal <strong>of</strong> Alternative Agriculture 2 (3): 99-106.<br />
Swarup, Anand (2010). Integrated plant nutrient supply and management strategies for<br />
enhancing soil quality, input use efficiency and crop productivity. J. Indian Soc. Soil<br />
Sci. 58:25-31.<br />
Effect <strong>of</strong> conjoint use <strong>of</strong> organic and inorganic sources on rainfed cotton productivity<br />
and chemical and biological properties <strong>of</strong> Vertisols<br />
Treatments<br />
Main Plot<br />
(Nutrient<br />
Management)<br />
M1 INM (75 % RDF +<br />
25% compensation<br />
through NPS<br />
compost)<br />
M2 Organic (100 %<br />
RDF through<br />
Nitrophosphosulpho<br />
compost)<br />
SE (m) <br />
Cotton yield<br />
(q ha –1 )<br />
Seed<br />
cotton<br />
Cotton<br />
stalk<br />
OC<br />
Available Nutrients<br />
(kg ha -1 )<br />
Avail.<br />
Sulphur<br />
(g kg -1 ) N P K (mg kg -1 ) SMBC<br />
(mg kg -<br />
1 )<br />
Biological properties<br />
DHA<br />
(µg g -1<br />
24 hr -1 )<br />
CO2<br />
evolution<br />
(mg 100 -1<br />
g soil)<br />
14.09 28.01 5.80 235 21.80 412 12.73 202.04 36.33 41.80<br />
12.35 24.48 6.12 228 20.50 404 12.36 210.41 46.01 47.59<br />
0.11 0.20 0.057 1.53 0.29 1.8<br />
0<br />
0.04 1.59 0.84 0.90<br />
CD at 5 % 0.33 0.58 0.169 4.53 0.86 5.34 0.11 4.73 2.49 2.66<br />
B. Sub plot (Cotton based intercropping systems)<br />
S1<br />
S2<br />
S3<br />
Control (only<br />
cotton) 12.39<br />
Cotton + Dhaincha<br />
(1:1) 14.30<br />
Cotton + Sunhemp<br />
(1:1) 13.89<br />
24.00 5.47 222 18.50 395 11.70 193.41 32.89 37.76<br />
28.91 6.43 242 23.70 418 13.30 217.43 48.91 52.27<br />
27.97 6.18 237 22.66 415 13.17 213.10 44.43 49.51<br />
678 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
S4<br />
S5<br />
Cotton + Green<br />
gram (1:1) 12.97<br />
Cotton + Black<br />
gram (1:1) 12.56<br />
SE (m)<br />
CD at 5 %<br />
25.65 5.91 230 20.61 409 12.35 204.94 40.31 42.97<br />
24.72 5.82 226 20.29 404 12.22 202.25 38.30 40.99<br />
0.17 0.32 0.090 2.41 0.46 2.8<br />
4<br />
0.52 0.96 0.267 7.17 1.35 8.4<br />
4<br />
0.06 2.52 1.33 1.42<br />
0.18 7.48 3.94 4.21<br />
C. Interaction effect NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS<br />
Initial value 4.96 204 14.90 379 8.27<br />
Sustaining Soil Health Through Organic Farming<br />
R. S. Choudhary* and Mahendra Singh<br />
Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Sirohi, Rajasthan<br />
Directorate <strong>of</strong> Extension Education, Agriculture University, Jodhpur, Rajasthan<br />
*agroudr2013@gmail.com<br />
T4a-49P-1427<br />
In 2050, the world population will reach ~10 billion, an increase <strong>of</strong> 30%. According to the UN,<br />
food insecurity is one <strong>of</strong> the greatest challenges facing us today. Soil is a precious natural<br />
resource, about 98% <strong>of</strong> our food—directly or indirectly—comes from soil. Therefore, sustaining<br />
soil health/sustainable soil management (SSM) is essential in addressing food security and socioeconomic<br />
and environmental issues. It can be inferred that enhancing carbon sequestration in soil<br />
is associated with increased biomass and, therefore, to soil fertility. Better quality soil ensures<br />
better yields; and exactly for this reason, we have been manipulating the natural soil with the<br />
reckless use <strong>of</strong> chemical fertilizers that provide additional nitrogen, phosphorous and potassium<br />
(NPK), leading to over fertilization and diminishing yields. Hence, organic farming aims to<br />
attain long-term sustainability since it is based on ecologically sound practices to provide<br />
nutrients for crop growth and thereby, in the long term, it ensures productivity gains by<br />
improving soil health. Presence <strong>of</strong> soil organic matter and soil microbial population are primarily<br />
useful indicators <strong>of</strong> soil health and productivity <strong>of</strong> crops. It is now a well-established fact that<br />
organically managed soil exhibits greater soil organic carbon and total nitrogen, lower nitrate<br />
leaching and biological soil quality than conventionally managed soil. Soil health management<br />
through organic approaches are needed for maintaining the sustainability <strong>of</strong> agriculture as well as<br />
to maintain the coordination with nature.<br />
679 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Controversy has long surrounded the question <strong>of</strong> nutritional differences between crops grown<br />
organically or using now-conventional methods, with studies dating back to the 1940s showing<br />
that farming methods can affect the nutrient density <strong>of</strong> crops. More recent studies have shown<br />
how reliance on tillage and synthetic nitrogen fertilizers influence soil life, and thereby soil<br />
health, in ways that can reduce mineral micronutrient uptake by and phytochemical production in<br />
crops. While organic farming tends to enhance soil health and conventional practices degrade it,<br />
relying on tillage for weed control on both organic and conventional farms degrades soil organic<br />
matter and can disrupt soil life in ways that reduce crop mineral uptake and phytochemical<br />
production. Soil health reflects both biotic and abiotic (chemical and physical) aspects <strong>of</strong> the soil.<br />
Conventional metrics for assessing soil quality have primarily focused on physical and chemical<br />
factors that support crop production, yet growing awareness <strong>of</strong> the importance <strong>of</strong> soil ecology<br />
and the diversity and abundance <strong>of</strong> soil life is reshaping agronomic thought to embrace<br />
enhancing and sustaining soil health as a fundamental agronomic goal. To achieve sustainable<br />
crop production, the primary requirement is the maintenance <strong>of</strong> soil fertility and soil health.<br />
Organic farming systems being highly complex and integrated biological systems could be the<br />
potential technology option to maintain good soil heath for sustainable crop production.<br />
T4a-50P-1261<br />
Type <strong>of</strong> Organic Manure and Biochar Affected Crop Production and Soil<br />
Health in Maize-Black Gram System Under Changing Climate<br />
Shaon Kumar Das 1 , B. U. Choudhury 2 , Ramgopal Laha 1 and V. K. Mishra 2<br />
1 ICAR Research Complex for NEH Region, Sikkim Centre, Gangtok, Sikkim-737102<br />
2 ICAR Research Complex for NEH Region, Umiam, Meghalaya-793103<br />
With increase in pyrolysis temperature the higher heating value <strong>of</strong> all the four-biochar decreased.<br />
The crystallinity index deceased (average 8.98%) in all biochar with increase in pyrolysis<br />
temperature. At low temperature pyrolysis the polarity index tends to increase and vice-versa.<br />
The biochar under study enhanced the seed germination and seedling growth significantly at a<br />
reasonable application rate than higher rate which might be due to secretion <strong>of</strong> chemical<br />
substances by the respective biochar. The organic manure/biochar (co-compost) ratio at 75:25<br />
enhanced maximum yield in poultry manure (4528 and 1027 kg/ha) followed by goat manure<br />
(4378 and 1016 kg/ha), vermicompost (4278 and 986 kg/ha), pig manure (4218 and 956 kg/ha),<br />
and FYM (4178 and 949 kg/ha) for maize and black gram, respectively. The microbial biomass<br />
carbon was highest in goat manure 5 t ha -1 +biochar 5 t ha -1 (476.58 mg kg -1 soil) and lowest in<br />
FYM @ 10 t ha -1 +biochar 5 t ha -1 (458.53 mg kg -1 soil) than control (301.43 mg kg -1 soil). The<br />
680 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
nitrogen use efficiency followed as BGB-SRF (38.3 %) > MSB-SRF (37.5 %) > LCB-SRF (36.2<br />
%) > PNB-SRF (35.7 %) than fertilizer (22.8 %). After 288 hr <strong>of</strong> incubation the N-P-K nutrient<br />
release from hydrogel-biochar composite varied 36.49-81.37%. Similarly, it exhibited 35.46-<br />
90.83% release <strong>of</strong> N-P-K in soil after 45 days study. The release kinetics fitted by Korsmeyer-<br />
Peppas model illustrates that the n values were 0.5-1.0 (anomalous transport). Utilizing four<br />
different biochars, the average removal rate <strong>of</strong> heavy metal from aqueous solution was 49.5-<br />
66.1%(Cd), 47.3-60.0%(Pb), 45.5-60.6%(Ni), 46.6-60.8%(Zn), 49.3-63.2%(Cu) and 52.7-64.2%<br />
(As) compared with no biochar treatment. Biochar amendment has attracted a fair amount <strong>of</strong><br />
research interest due to its abundant usage and wide potential. Assuming that the science <strong>of</strong><br />
biochar is ‘unambiguously beneficial’, all the scientific community should support the biochar<br />
application for modern science and technological intervension.<br />
T4a-51P-1176<br />
Vermicomposting-A Module for Sustainable Soil Management in South Garo<br />
Hills, Meghalaya, India<br />
Titus Dalang K. Momin*, Athokpam Haribhushan, Basu langpoklakpam,<br />
Rike Ch A Sangma, Tanya R Marak, Bishorjit Ningthoujam, Rupam Bhattacharjya and<br />
Thongam Monika Devi<br />
KVK, South Garo Hills, Chokpot, Meghalaya<br />
*dalangssangma76@gmail.com<br />
Vermicompost is recognized as a high-nutrient bi<strong>of</strong>ertilizer with a range <strong>of</strong> microbial<br />
communities and it considerably increases the growth and yield <strong>of</strong> different field crops,<br />
vegetables, flower and fruit crops. Vermicomposting organic material with earthworms not only<br />
yields the healthiest organic manure but also lessens environmental pollution and health hazards.<br />
The experiment was laid out in a three-replicated randomized block design (RBD) with 3<br />
treatments. The highest production <strong>of</strong> vermicompost was recorded in the T3 (348kg/vermibed).<br />
The production <strong>of</strong> vermicompost in T2 was (340kg/vermibed) followed by T1 <strong>of</strong><br />
(332kg/vermibed). Result revealed that among the different vermicomposting units T3 was<br />
efficient in terms <strong>of</strong> quantity <strong>of</strong> vermicompost harvested. Among the Treatments the highest<br />
Benefit: Cost ratio was recorded in T3 (4.85.1) followed by T2 (4.74.1) and T1(4.63.1).<br />
681 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
T4a-52P- 1137<br />
Weedy rice: A Threat to Sustainable Rice Production under Direct Seeding<br />
V. Anjaly<br />
Ph.D. scholar, Department <strong>of</strong> Agronomy, Punjab Agricultural University<br />
Rice is the staple food <strong>of</strong> more than 50% <strong>of</strong> the world’s population and the conventional method<br />
<strong>of</strong> rice growing, which involves puddling followed by transplanting, is a labour and water<br />
intensive process. Increased costs or decreased availability <strong>of</strong> irrigation water and labour has<br />
forced the farmers in Asia to slowly proceed towards direct seeding <strong>of</strong> rice (Chauhan, 2012). The<br />
absence <strong>of</strong> suppressive effect <strong>of</strong> standing water on weed emergence and similarity in seed sizes<br />
<strong>of</strong> crop and weeds has led to the serious concern <strong>of</strong> weedy rice infestation in most <strong>of</strong> the rice<br />
growing tracts. Weedy rice infestation raises the production costs, lowers the crop yield and<br />
qualitatively decreases the farmer’s income, through reduced seed value at the time <strong>of</strong> harvest .<br />
In recent years, weedy rice has emerged to be one <strong>of</strong> the major troublesome weeds in rice<br />
growing Asian countries, including Malaysia, Thailand, Philippines, India, Republic <strong>of</strong> Korea,<br />
Vietnam and Sri Lanka<br />
Weedy rice (Oryza sativa f. spontanea) is believed to be evolved through the interbreeding<br />
between cultivated rice (O. sativa) and wild rice (O. nivara/O. perennis) (Chauhan, 2013). The<br />
physical and physiological similarities <strong>of</strong> weedy rice to cultivated rice have made the weedy seed<br />
spread more easier through crop seed contamination. Features like faster growth, pr<strong>of</strong>use tiller<br />
production, early flowering and high competence for nutrients, light and space provide them<br />
competitive advantage over cultivated rice. The weed is also characterized by longer seed<br />
dormancy, easy seed shattering (enhance weed seed bank), presence <strong>of</strong> awns, red pericarp and<br />
pigmented aleuronic layer, and the ability to thrive in adverse agro-climatic conditions<br />
Weed management strategies such as use <strong>of</strong> clean rice seeds and machineries, regular inspection<br />
and roguing <strong>of</strong> weedy rice plants before seed set, repeated cultivation <strong>of</strong> rice fields, stale seed<br />
bed technique, use <strong>of</strong> transplanting technique wherever plenty <strong>of</strong> exploitable water is available,<br />
use <strong>of</strong> high seeding rates, row seeding using seed drills, and use <strong>of</strong> weed competitive crop<br />
cultivar with early vigour and quick canopy closure, are advocated (Chauhan, 2013). An<br />
improved broadcasting method called ‘parachute planting’ is practiced in Vietnam and Sri<br />
Lanka, in which the rice seedlings, grown in nursery, are thrown onto the puddled soil, with<br />
water depth maintained at 5 to 10 cm. Chauhan et al. (2014) concluded that seedling broadcast<br />
and transplanted rice methods are the most effective rice establishment techniques to reduce<br />
weedy rice panicles and seed production, and to attain highest rice grain yield. Adoption <strong>of</strong><br />
682 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
cultivars with purple-coloured leaves will help in differentiating the weedy rice and other grassy<br />
weeds from the direct sown rice. Rotation <strong>of</strong> rice with a dissimilar crop, such as corn, mungbean,<br />
soybean and sesame, helps in disrupting the growth cycle <strong>of</strong> many problematic weeds, including<br />
purple nutsedge (Cyperus rotundus) (Chauhan, 2013).<br />
Similarity in terms <strong>of</strong> anatomical and physiological traits between rice and weedy rice makes the<br />
herbicidal control <strong>of</strong> the weed difficult. Application <strong>of</strong> pre-emergent herbicides (pretilachlor,<br />
metolachlor, oxadiazon) with appropriate modification in time and method <strong>of</strong> application is<br />
advisable (Chauhan, 2013). The ‘KAU weed wiper’ is a device specially designed for the control<br />
<strong>of</strong> weedy rice through the direct application <strong>of</strong> non-selective herbicides like glyphosate or<br />
glufosinate ammonium on the earheads. The quick growth <strong>of</strong> weedy rice results in about 15-30<br />
cm height difference between cultivated rice and weedy rice. This facilitates the easier<br />
application <strong>of</strong> herbicides on the earhead <strong>of</strong> weedy rice without having any phytotoxic effect on<br />
rice. It was reported that the weed control efficiency <strong>of</strong> weed wiper in terms <strong>of</strong> drying <strong>of</strong> weedy<br />
rice panicles is as high as 83 to 88%. According to Suh (2008), herbicide resistant (glyphosate-,<br />
glufosinate ammonium- and imidazolinone resistant) rice cultivars could be an effective tool for<br />
farmers to improve weedy rice control with reduced costs.<br />
Heavy infestation <strong>of</strong> weedy rice has forced many farmers to abandon their crops without<br />
harvesting. The problem will worsen and become more persistent as direct seeding increasingly<br />
becomes the popular method <strong>of</strong> crop establishment in rice. This may challenge the rice<br />
production system in the country if not managed effectively in the subsequent years.<br />
Awareness has to be created among farmers regarding the use <strong>of</strong> clean and uncontaminated seeds<br />
and machineries. Future research should focus on the integration <strong>of</strong> cultural management<br />
practices with the use <strong>of</strong> cultivars capable to grow in flooded conditions. Strong gelines for the<br />
use <strong>of</strong> herbicide resistant rice cultivars need to be formed to avoid the development <strong>of</strong> resistance<br />
in weedy rice through gene flow.<br />
References<br />
Chauhan, B. S., and Johnson, D. E. 2010. Weedy rice (Oryza sativa L.) I. Grain characteristics<br />
and growth response to competition <strong>of</strong> weedy rice variants from five Asian countries.<br />
Weed Sci. 58:374-380.<br />
Chauhan, B. S. 2013. Strategies to manage weedy rice in Asia. Crop Prot. 48:51-56.<br />
Chauhan, B. S., Abeysekera, A. S., Wickramarathe, M. S., Kulatunga, S. D. and Wickrama, U.<br />
B. 2014. Effect <strong>of</strong> rice establishment methods on weedy rice (Oryza sativa L.) infestation<br />
and grain yield <strong>of</strong> cultivated rice (O. sativa L.) in Sri Lanka. Crop Prot. 55:42-49.<br />
683 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Rathore, M., Singh, R. and Kumar, B., 2013. Weedy rice: an emerging threat to rice cultivation<br />
and options for its management. Curr. Sci. 1067-1072.<br />
Suh, H.S., 2008. Weedy Rice. National Institute <strong>of</strong> Crop Science, Rural Development<br />
Administration (RDA), Korea.<br />
T4a-53P-1546<br />
Yield and Nutrient Uptake <strong>of</strong> Direct Seeded Rice under Different Tillage and<br />
Nutrient Management Practices<br />
P. Manoj Kumar 1* , D K Roy 2 , Santosh Kumar Singh 2 , N K Ray 2<br />
1 Kerala Agricultural University, Thrissur, Kerala, India<br />
2 Dr. Rajendra Prasad Central Agricultural University, Pusa, Bihar, India<br />
* manojpittala@gmail.com<br />
Rice (Oryza sativa L.) is one <strong>of</strong> the major food crops, especially in Southeast Asia, where it is<br />
the principal diet for Asian inhabitants, with about 35-80% <strong>of</strong> the calorie supply for daily needs.<br />
Rice is grown in around all Indian states and Bihar, one <strong>of</strong> them, is the country’s 6 th largest in<br />
terms <strong>of</strong> rice production, with a yearly output <strong>of</strong> 8.09 Mt from an area <strong>of</strong> 3.3 Mha. The average<br />
productivity in Bihar is 2.44 t/ha, slightly below the national average (DoE and S, Govt. <strong>of</strong><br />
Bihar, 2019-20). Conventional cultivation <strong>of</strong> transplanted rice, besides being tiresome,<br />
expensive, and time-killing, long-term puddling practice in rice cultivating areas affects soil<br />
aggregates, the beneficial microbial activity, and the general soil environment (Bhattacharyya et<br />
al., 2012). Rational nutrient supply is a prerequisite for the growth and development <strong>of</strong> rice.<br />
Disproportionate nutrient application diminishes nutrient uptake by crops, NUE, deteriorates the<br />
ecological quality, and increases the cultivation cost. Against the above backdrop, this study was<br />
conducted to determine the effect <strong>of</strong> different tillage and nutrient management practices on the<br />
yield and nutrient uptake <strong>of</strong> direct-seeded rice.<br />
Methodology<br />
A field experiment was conducted in an ongoing long-term tillage trail that was established in<br />
2010 under a set <strong>of</strong> tillage and nutrient management treatments with the Rice-Maize cropping<br />
system at the Agronomical Research Farm (plot no. 5) <strong>of</strong> Tirhut college <strong>of</strong> agriculture, Dholi<br />
(RPCAU) during Kharif 2019. The soil belongs to the great group calciorthent, textural class <strong>of</strong><br />
sandy loam, alkaline, moderate in OC, N, phosphorous, potassium and deficient in sulphur, and<br />
zinc. A short-duration rice variety Prabhat was taken as a test variety. The total rainfall received<br />
during the crop growth period was 1039.8 mm. The experiment was laid out in ‘split-plot design’<br />
684 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
with tillage practices under main plot treatments which include T1: Conventional tillage (CT);<br />
T2: Zero tillage (ZT) and T3: Zero tillage + Residue (ZT+R) and nutrient management practices<br />
as subplot treatments which include N1: Recommended Dose <strong>of</strong> Fertilizer (RDF) @ 120-60-40<br />
kg N-P2O5-K2O kg ha -1 with N applied in three splits; N2: site-specific nutrient management<br />
(SSNM) based on Nutrient Expert for rice @ 109-28-46 kg N-P2O5-K2O with N applied in<br />
three splits and N3: 60 % N @ basal + green seeker ged N application (GSGN) (rest <strong>of</strong> the N was<br />
applied based on the real-time crop demand at regular intervals) + 100% PK <strong>of</strong> RDF. Three splits<br />
<strong>of</strong> N were applied @ 2:1:1 ratio at basal, active tillering, and panicle initiation in N1 and N2<br />
treatments.<br />
Results<br />
The yield attributes like panicles/m 2 and grains/ panicle were significantly higher under ZT+R<br />
(239; 122) over CT (201; 107) among tillage practices whereas, among nutrient management<br />
treatments, SSNM based on Nutrient Expert (228; 119) has significantly higher values over RDF<br />
(212; 111). Both grain and straw yields <strong>of</strong> DSR were statistically superior in ZT+R over CT with<br />
14.03 % and 9.27 % more yields, respectively but were statistically at par with ZT whereas,<br />
SSNM based on Nutrient Expert has significantly superior grain and straw yields over RDF with<br />
14.91 % and 7.73 % more yields respectively but were statistically at par with 60% N + GSGN +<br />
100% PK <strong>of</strong> RDF. Any <strong>of</strong> the treatments did not influence Harvest Index (HI); however, higher<br />
HI was found under ZT+R (41.05) fb ZT (40.89) fb CT (39.86) among tillage practices while,<br />
SSNM based on Nutrient Expert has higher HI (41.25) fb 60% N + GSGN + 100% PK <strong>of</strong> RDF<br />
(41.04) fb RDF (39.52) across nutrient management practices.These better yields under ZT +R,<br />
ZT could be credited to the improved soil structure, overall porosity, aggregate stability, water<br />
holding capacity (WHC) due to less soil disruption and with constant crop residue accumulation<br />
over the years enriched the soil with organic matter and soil biota which enhances the<br />
mineralization process and increasing plant nutrient availability and also these precision nutrient<br />
management practices aided in timely and balanced availability <strong>of</strong> all vital nutrients thereby<br />
progressing crop yields through optimized nutrient usage by the rice crop. The total N, P, K, Zn,<br />
Fe, Cu, and Mn uptake by the crop was found to be significantly higher in Zero tillage + Residue<br />
management among tillage practices, whereas among nutrient management treatments, SSNM<br />
based on Nutrient Expert have significantly higher total N, P, and K uptake but has no significant<br />
influence on micronutrient uptake and these results are in accordance with Rajesh et al. (2018).<br />
685 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Tillage practices<br />
Effect <strong>of</strong> tillage and nutrient management practices on yield performance <strong>of</strong> DSR<br />
Treatment<br />
No. <strong>of</strong><br />
panicles/ m 2<br />
No. <strong>of</strong> grains/<br />
panicle<br />
Grain yield<br />
(q/ha)<br />
Straw yield<br />
(q/ha)<br />
Harvest<br />
Index (%)<br />
T1: Conventional tillage 201 107 39.50 59.25 39.86<br />
T2: Zero tillage 220 115 43.51 62.87 40.89<br />
T3: Zero tillage + Residue 239 122 45.04 64.74 41.05<br />
SEm± 6 2 0.64 1.05 0.51<br />
LSD (p =0.05) 23 9 2.51 4.11 NS<br />
Nutrient management<br />
N1: RDF 212 111 39.16 59.65 39.52<br />
N2: SSNM based on Nutrient Expert 228 119 45.00 64.26 41.25<br />
N3: 60%N+GSGN+100 % PK <strong>of</strong> RDF 219 114 43.89 62.94 41.04<br />
SEm± 4 2 1.19 1.18 0.87<br />
LSD (p=0.05) 12 6 3.65 3.63 NS<br />
LSD (p=0.05) (T x NM) NS NS NS NS NS<br />
Effect <strong>of</strong> tillage and nutrient management practices on total uptake (grain + straw) <strong>of</strong><br />
N, P, K, Zn, Fe, Cu and Mn by direct seeded rice (DSR)<br />
Treatment N P K Zn Fe Cu Mn<br />
Tillage practices (kg/ha) (g/ha)<br />
T1: Conventional tillage 76.76 22.20 92.23 278.32 448.50 44.16 318.85<br />
T2: Zero tillage 83.85 24.32 96.60 298.37 484.42 50.36 339.53<br />
T3: Zero tillage + Residue 86.71 24.62 99.99 305.14 489.57 54.79 345.94<br />
SEm± 1.38 0.23 0.83 2.48 6.50 1.36 4.99<br />
LSD (p =0.05) 5.42 0.92 3.25 9.74 25.53 5.36 19.61<br />
Nutrient management<br />
N1: RDF 76.09 22.17 90.36 286.54 459.22 46.88 328.08<br />
N2: SSNM based on Nutrient Expert 87.38 24.77 99.51 296.67 485.10 52.84 340.52<br />
N3: 60%N+GSGN+100 % PK <strong>of</strong> RDF 83.85 24.19 98.95 298.63 478.17 49.60 335.72<br />
SEm± 2.08 0.49 1.62 5.12 9.50 1.54 6.99<br />
LSD (p=0.05) 6.42 1.50 5.00 NS NS NS NS<br />
LSD (p=0.05) (T x NM) NS NS NS NS NS NS NS<br />
Conclusion<br />
In a nutshell, the results <strong>of</strong> this study indicated that direct seeding <strong>of</strong> Kharif rice under zero tillage +<br />
residue management practice coupled with SSNM based on Nutrient Expert led to improved growth<br />
parameters, yield attributes, crop yields, and nutrient uptake by the crop.<br />
686 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
References<br />
Bhattacharyya, R., Tuti, M. D., Bisht, J. K., Bhatt, J. C., and Gupta, H. S. 2012. Conservation<br />
tillage and fertilization impact on soil aggregation and carbon pools in the Indian<br />
Himalayas under an irrigated rice-wheat rotation. Soil Science 177: 218–228.<br />
Directorate <strong>of</strong> Economics and Statistics, Govt. <strong>of</strong> Bihar, 2019-20.<br />
Rajesh, V., Balanagoudar, S. R., Veeresh, H., Gaddi, A. K., and Ramesh, Y. M. 2018. Effect <strong>of</strong><br />
Nutrient Management Approaches and Major Nutrients on Dry Direct Seeded Rice (dry-<br />
DSR) in TBP Command Area. Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. App. Sci. 7(2): 1239-1247.<br />
T4a-54P-1411<br />
Zero Tillage Technique with High Yielding Variety <strong>of</strong> Wheat Cultivation as<br />
Compared to Traditional practices <strong>of</strong> farmers field in Front line<br />
demonstration under NICRA <strong>of</strong> Morena District M.P.<br />
Rajpal Singh Tomar, Swati Singh Tomar, Brijraj Singh Kansana, PKS Gurjar and<br />
Debesh Singh<br />
RVSKVV, Krishi Vigyan Kendra, A.B Road Morena<br />
kvk.morena@rvskvv.net<br />
India is the second largest producer <strong>of</strong> wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in the world. After the Green<br />
Revolution, the production <strong>of</strong> wheat has shown a huge increase. The major states involved<br />
Madhya Pradesh, Uttar Pradesh, Punjab and Haryana. They account for nearly 70 percent <strong>of</strong> the<br />
total wheat production <strong>of</strong> the country. Madhya Pradesh, Uttar pradesh Punjab and Haryana yield<br />
the highest amount <strong>of</strong> wheat because <strong>of</strong> the availability <strong>of</strong> better irrigation facilities. Wheat is the<br />
second most important food crop <strong>of</strong> India next to rice and demand for wheat in the country is<br />
increasing day by day.<br />
The study was conducted Village Ata Gadikhera Block <strong>of</strong> Joura in Morena district Madhya<br />
Pradesh under Frontline Demonstration by Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Morena through coordinating<br />
Institution RVSKVV, Krishi Vishwa Vidyalaya, Gwalior, M.P. Demonstration with Zero Tillage<br />
wheat has shown primarily positive impacts on wheat crop management, particularly through<br />
reduced input needs combined with potential yield increase. To evaluate the economics <strong>of</strong> high<br />
yielding variety (MP-1203) and their utilization in zero tillage to improve income <strong>of</strong> farmers and<br />
agricultural productivity, the utilization <strong>of</strong> high yielding variety under frontline demonstration<br />
programme under NICRA. The average yield <strong>of</strong> zero tillage technique was 49.6 q/ha. The data<br />
collected from the field were analyzed and the result <strong>of</strong> the study in respect <strong>of</strong> percentage increase<br />
687 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
in yield in MP-1203 with ZT increased 27.33% over farmers practice by usingMP-1203. The B:C<br />
ratio was observed higher side by using MP-1203 is 2.53 as compared to conventional method<br />
sowing <strong>of</strong> wheat is 1.48 The B: C ratio was observed higher side in zero-tillage method as<br />
compared to conventional method sowing <strong>of</strong> wheat. The finding have clearly established that<br />
wheat sowing can be advanced in yield by using MP-1203 over utilization <strong>of</strong> local variety <strong>of</strong><br />
wheat, under zero tillage method it also clearly established that wheat sowing can be advanced in<br />
yield over conventional tillage system.<br />
T4a-55P-1579<br />
Paired Row Method <strong>of</strong> Cultivation in Maize – a Water Conservation<br />
Technology for Sustainable Yields and Higher Net returns<br />
K. Ravi Kumar 1 , J. Hemantha Kumar 1 , V. Chaitanya 1 , Jessie Suneetha.W 1 , PSM Phanisri 1 ,<br />
D. Nagaraju 1 , R. Uma Reddy 2 and J.V. Prasad 3<br />
1.<br />
Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Wyra, Khammam.<br />
2.<br />
RARS, Warangal.<br />
3.<br />
ICAR, ATARI, Zone-X, CRIDA, Santhosnagar, Hyderabad<br />
Maize is an important crop widely grown for food and feed and is one <strong>of</strong> the most versatile<br />
emerging crops having wider adaptability under varied agro climatic conditions It is mainly<br />
cultivated as rainfed crop in Kharif and as irrigated crop during Rabi. In Khammam district,<br />
Maize is one <strong>of</strong> the important cereal crop cultivated by farmers which is having a normal area <strong>of</strong><br />
13073 ha. It is one <strong>of</strong> the major crop best suited for Rabi which gives good yield with good<br />
management practices. Unfortunately, much <strong>of</strong> the expected yields are not realized because <strong>of</strong><br />
traditional method <strong>of</strong> planting and cultivation resulting in low plant population, poor and uneven<br />
development <strong>of</strong> cobs, limiting moisture levels which affect the crop during the critical stages<br />
resulting in yield loss, nutrient deficiency and wastage <strong>of</strong> fertilizers during application. This<br />
factors in turn increases cost <strong>of</strong> cultivation, competition between weeds and main crop for water,<br />
nutrients and other inputs which affect the crop growth because <strong>of</strong> weed dominance for nutrients.<br />
All these factors together and cultivation <strong>of</strong> maize in the traditional method <strong>of</strong> planting by the<br />
farmers were contributing to the less yields <strong>of</strong> the crop. To overcome this problem, KVK-Wyra<br />
scientists intervened and introduced paired row technique in Maize along with drip irrigation. In<br />
paired row method <strong>of</strong> cultivation, spacing between plant to plant is 20-25 cm, row to row spacing<br />
is 30 cm and spacing between one pair to another pair is 90 cm. For irrigation and fertigation to<br />
the plants, a drip lateral is spread in between the two rows which help in giving uniform water<br />
and fertilizer to both the rows thus decreasing the no <strong>of</strong> lateral requirement per acre. Further, due<br />
688 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
to efficient use <strong>of</strong> sunlight and increased light interception leads to thick and stronger stalks and<br />
healthy development <strong>of</strong> cobs. The results revealed that, farmers realized an additional yield <strong>of</strong> 30<br />
q/ha in paired row method when compared to traditional cultivation method. Further, an<br />
additional income achieved from paired row method <strong>of</strong> planting was Rs.61,467.5/- /ha. Besides<br />
this, the paired row method <strong>of</strong> planting recorded higher gross returns, net returns and B:C ratio<br />
when compared to traditional cultivation method.<br />
T4a-56P-1567<br />
Improving Productivity <strong>of</strong> Taramira (Eruca sativa Mill.) Under Conserved<br />
Soil Moisture in Arid Environments<br />
M. Patidar, R. Saranya and Anil Patidar<br />
ICAR- CAZRI, Reginal Research Station, Jaisalmer, Rajasthan 342 003 India<br />
The availability <strong>of</strong> soil moisture is the most important factor for growing crops in arid conditions<br />
therefore the choice <strong>of</strong> crops is limited due to the low and erratic nature <strong>of</strong> rainfall (Moharana et<br />
al. 2016). Sometimes the rain receives at the end <strong>of</strong> the Kharif season is not utilized by the<br />
Kharif crops and is also not sufficient for growing subsequent long duration rabi crops but the<br />
conserved soil moisture can be utilized for short duration rabi crops. Taramira (Eruca sativa<br />
Mill.) is short duration crop, particularly suitable for north-western Rajasthan, and can be grown<br />
in the early rabi season utilizing the conserved soil moisture (Mundiyara and Jakhar, 2017).<br />
Further, the time <strong>of</strong> sowing needs to be adjusted for improving productivity. With this, the<br />
experiment was conducted to study the utilisation <strong>of</strong> conserved soil moisture and the effect <strong>of</strong><br />
sowing time on its productivity.<br />
Methodology<br />
The experiment was conducted during rabi 2021-22 involving three different dates (Last week <strong>of</strong><br />
September (S1), October (S2), and November (S3)). T1 (last week <strong>of</strong> September)- utilized<br />
conserved soil moisture <strong>of</strong> (103 mm rainfall received in that month) + one irrigation at grain<br />
filling stage, T2 (sown at last week <strong>of</strong> October)- 1 st irrigation after sowing+ 2 nd irrigation at grain<br />
filling stage; T3(sown at last week <strong>of</strong> November)- 1 st irrigation after sowing+ 2 nd irrigation at<br />
grain filling stage. The climate <strong>of</strong> the area is hyper-arid, characterized by exceptionally hot dry<br />
summers, and cold dry winters. The soil is coarse loamy sand, low in organic carbon and<br />
available nitrogen, and medium in available phosphorus with pH 8.1. The rainfall during the year<br />
2021 is 338 mm. Taramira variety RTM -13 was sown in the plot size <strong>of</strong> 5.5 m × 4.5m with 30 ×<br />
10 cm spacing using a seed rate <strong>of</strong> 5 kg/ha. The treatments were replicated four times randomly.<br />
689 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Observations were recorded for plant height, primary branches, pod per branch, pod length, and<br />
seed yield.<br />
Results<br />
The maximum plant height and pod per branch were recorded in S1 (91.58 cm; 34.92) followed<br />
by S2 (87.75 cm; 23.92) and S3 (82.50 cm; 25.50). There was no significant difference in<br />
number <strong>of</strong> primary branches and pod length. The seed yield was highest in S1 (950 kg/ha)<br />
followed by S2 (837.5 kg/ha) and S3 (675 kg/ha). The increase in seed yield due to the first<br />
sowing was by 13.4 and 40.8 % over the second and third sowing respectively. The higher seed<br />
yield in first sowing (S1) was due to better root development and plant growth as result <strong>of</strong> more<br />
availability <strong>of</strong> soil moisture. Its efficient root system helped in extracting moisture from deeper<br />
layers <strong>of</strong> soil.<br />
Conclusion<br />
The result indicates that the crop sown in the last week <strong>of</strong> September, which utilised the<br />
conserved soil moisture, gave a better seed yield than other dates <strong>of</strong> sowing with two irrigations.<br />
During periods <strong>of</strong> severe drought and late monsoon, taramira is the only alternative crop left for<br />
arid region farmers to sustain their livelihood.<br />
References<br />
Moharana, P.C., Santra, P., Singh, D.V., Suresh Kumar, Goyal, R.K., Deepesh Machiwal and<br />
Yadav, O.P. 2016. ICAR-Central Arid Zone Research Institute, Jodhpur: Erosion<br />
Processes and Desertification in the Thar Desert <strong>of</strong> India. Proceedings <strong>of</strong> the Indian<br />
National Science Academy. 82. 10.16943/ptinsa/2016/48507.<br />
Mundiyara, R. and Jakhar, M. L. 2017 Identify Promising Parents and Crosses <strong>of</strong> Taramira<br />
(Eruca sativa Mill.) for Improvement in Irrigated and Drought Conditions. J.<br />
Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry, 6(4): 789-795<br />
690 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
T4a-57P-1367<br />
Influence <strong>of</strong> Organic and Inorganic Nutrients on Nitrogen & Potassium<br />
Fractions In Relation to Yield <strong>of</strong> Elephant Foot Yam - Blackgram System<br />
K. V. Aswin 1* , K. Laxminarayana 2 and J.V.N.S. Prasad 3<br />
*1 College <strong>of</strong> Agriculture, OUAT, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, 751003<br />
2 Regional Centre, ICAR-Central Tuber Crops Research Institute, Bhubaneswar,<br />
Odisha, 751 019<br />
3<br />
ICAR-Central Research Institute <strong>of</strong> Dryland Agriculture, Hyderabad, Telangana, 500059<br />
*aswinkv91@gmail.com<br />
Elephant foot yam (EFY) (Amorphophallus paeoniifolius L), crop produced for its underground<br />
modified stem, encourage the farmers to plant because <strong>of</strong> high quality corms, minimal pest and<br />
disease incidence, and low labour requirements. Black gram [Vigna mungo (L.)] is known as<br />
"King <strong>of</strong> Legumes" and produced as a mixed crop, cash crop, and sequential crop in cropping<br />
systems. Legume-based cropping systems have been shown to be generally beneficial to the soil<br />
by preservation <strong>of</strong> organic matter, increasing soil nitrogen, improving soil physical properties<br />
and by breaking the cycle <strong>of</strong> soil-borne diseases. Inorganic forms <strong>of</strong> major nutrients significantly<br />
contribute to yield and quality attributes <strong>of</strong> crops. Plant roots take up nitrogen from the soil<br />
mostly as NO3 - and to some extent as NH4 + -N. Use <strong>of</strong> chemical fertilizers in conjunction with<br />
organic manures has been reported to influence the dynamics <strong>of</strong> inorganic K fractions. The<br />
distribution <strong>of</strong> inorganic forms <strong>of</strong> N and K in soils is important in understanding the conditions<br />
controlling their availability to growing crops and effective nutrient management strategies.<br />
Methodology<br />
Yield parameters <strong>of</strong> EFY and blackgram were recorded at harvest, the grain & haulm samples <strong>of</strong><br />
black gram as well as corm samples <strong>of</strong> elephant foot yam were collected, washed thoroughly,<br />
oven dried at 60ºC and dry weights were recorded. Inorganic forms <strong>of</strong> N namely NH4-N and<br />
NO3-N were determined by steam distillation method (Black, 1965). Inorganic K fractions were<br />
determined by Boiling Nitric Acid Method (Wood and Deturk, (1941); Pratt, (1965)).<br />
Relationship <strong>of</strong> different N and K fractions with available nitrogen and potassium was worked<br />
out respectively, by computing simple correlation coefficients by employing standard procedure<br />
as described by Gomez and Gomez (1984).<br />
691 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Results<br />
Yield Performance <strong>of</strong> Elephant Foot Yam and Black gram<br />
The higher yield response to the organic manure and inorganic fertilizers might be attributed to<br />
decomposition <strong>of</strong> organic manure as it improves the physical and biological properties and<br />
nutrient release pattern in to the soil and supplements the effect <strong>of</strong> inorganic fertilizers.<br />
Yield response (%)<br />
70<br />
60<br />
50<br />
40<br />
30<br />
20<br />
10<br />
0<br />
EFY Yield response (%) Black gram Yield response (%)<br />
Effect <strong>of</strong> organic and inorganic nutrients on yield <strong>of</strong> elephant foot yam and black gram<br />
Relationship <strong>of</strong> Available Nwith Inorganic nitrogen fractions and Availbale K with<br />
Inorganic Potassium fractions<br />
Significant positive correlation could be observed among the nitrogen fractions as these fractions<br />
are dependent on each other for their synthesis during mineralization process. The total K<br />
content <strong>of</strong> the soil showed highly significant correlation with non-exchangeable K (r=0.944 ** )<br />
and least with exchangeable K (r=0.875 ** ). The highest correlation was recorded in<br />
Exchangeable K (r = 0.979 ** ) followed by non-exchangeable K (r=0.927 ** ) and water soluble K<br />
(r=0.921 ** ).<br />
Conclusion<br />
Application <strong>of</strong> half <strong>of</strong> the recommended doses <strong>of</strong> NPK fertilizers in combination with organic<br />
manure (FYM) sustain the soil quality, and enhances the productivity and quality <strong>of</strong> elephant<br />
foot yam – black gram cropping system in acid Alfisols <strong>of</strong> Eastern India. Integrated application<br />
<strong>of</strong> organic manure and inorganic chemical fertilizers at balanced proportion not only helps to<br />
augment the crop yields but also enhances the available nutrient status as well as the yield and<br />
quality <strong>of</strong> elephant foot yam-black gram system. Cultivation <strong>of</strong> pulses as inter crops in between<br />
tropical root and tuber crops not only enhances the total farm productivity but also enrich the soil<br />
fertility by accumulation <strong>of</strong> its biomass that facilitates the biological activity <strong>of</strong> the soils.<br />
692 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges & Opportunities<br />
during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
References<br />
Basumatary A. (2018). Integrated Sulphur Management in Rapeseed (Brassica camprestis) -<br />
Blackgram (Vigna mungo) sequence in an Inceptisol <strong>of</strong> Assam, Journal <strong>of</strong> the Indian<br />
Society <strong>of</strong> Soil Science, 66 (4): 425-431.<br />
Imai H, Kamata K and Yang YF. (1990). Developing Improved Cropping Systems for<br />
Vegetables and Legumes in the Tropics and Change in soil nutrient<br />
status, Japanese Journal <strong>of</strong> Tropical Agriculture, 34(3): 181-190.<br />
Laxminarayana and Pardhan, (2017). Effect <strong>of</strong> inorganic fertilizers and organic manures on<br />
microbial activities and yield <strong>of</strong> elephant foot yam (Amorphophallus paenifolius L) -<br />
black gram (Vigna mungo L) cropping system, IJSAR, 4(9), 2017; 47-63<br />
693 | Page Resource conservation and rainfed agriculture
Theme– 5<br />
Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones<br />
etc) for crop management & assessment
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Theme – 5: Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc.) for crop<br />
management & assessment<br />
List <strong>of</strong> <strong>Extended</strong> Summaries<br />
Title Title First Author ID<br />
1 Intercropping as ‘Ecological Precision Agriculture’<br />
to Address Field Heterogeneity<br />
2 Performance <strong>of</strong> Soybean, Pigeonpea Strip Cropping<br />
under Complete Mechanization for Rainfed Area <strong>of</strong><br />
Marathwada Region<br />
3 Real-Time Monitoring and Management <strong>of</strong> Drought<br />
in Groundnut<br />
4 Big Data Analytics for Identifying Districts with<br />
Untapped Potential in Rainfed Agriculture and<br />
Bridging Gaps<br />
5 A Mobile app for Unreaped Yield Potentials <strong>of</strong><br />
Major Rainfed Crops and Scope for Bridging Yield<br />
Gaps - A Decision Support System<br />
6 PASM induced yield variability in soybean crop at<br />
Akola conditions<br />
7 Development and Evaluation <strong>of</strong> DC Motor Powered<br />
Brush Cutter<br />
8 Modified Vegetative Drought Response Index<br />
(VegDRI) for Drought Risk Assessment <strong>of</strong> Andhra<br />
Pradesh<br />
9 Performance Evaluation <strong>of</strong> Mini Tractor Operated<br />
Rotary Weeder with L-Type Blades in Redgram<br />
Crop<br />
10 Sorghum Yield Response to Future Climate in a<br />
Semi-Arid Environment<br />
11 Stress Management in Wheat Crop through Foliar<br />
Spray <strong>of</strong> TGA Agro-chemical<br />
12 Effect <strong>of</strong> foliar application <strong>of</strong> different nano<br />
fertilizers on performance <strong>of</strong> rainfed maize in<br />
Southern Telangana<br />
13 Evaluation <strong>of</strong> Horse Gram Grain for Bio-<br />
Accessibility <strong>of</strong> Iron and Zinc by in-vitro Method<br />
14 Assessment <strong>of</strong> Soil Erodibility Indices for Beed<br />
Station<br />
15 Floor Management Machinery for Weed Control in<br />
Horticulture Crops<br />
16 Impact <strong>of</strong> eCO2 and eTemp. on Aphis craccivora<br />
Koch. on Groundnut and Projection <strong>of</strong> Future Pest<br />
Status<br />
Iman Raj<br />
Chongtham<br />
WN Narkhede<br />
B Sahadeva Reddy<br />
BMK Raju<br />
R Nagarjuna<br />
Kumar<br />
AR Tupe<br />
Ashish S Dhimate<br />
GS Pratyusha<br />
Kranthi<br />
VR Mallikarjuna<br />
MA Sarath<br />
Chandran<br />
RS Rathore<br />
KA Gopinath<br />
K Sreedevi<br />
Shankar<br />
M More Ram<br />
B Sanjeeva Reddy<br />
M Srinivasa Rao<br />
T5-01O-1063<br />
T5-02O-1343<br />
T5-03O-1210<br />
T5-03aO-1041<br />
T5-04R-1019<br />
T5-05R-1330<br />
T5-06R-1419<br />
T5-07R-1486<br />
T5-08R-1534<br />
T5-09R-1101<br />
T5-10P-1003<br />
T5-11P-1024<br />
T5-12P-1051<br />
T5-13P-1065<br />
T5-14P-1084<br />
T5-15P-1087<br />
Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment<br />
694 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Title Title First Author ID<br />
17 Mapping Quantitative Trait Nucleotides in Spring<br />
Wheat for Yield Performance under Limited Water<br />
Conditions<br />
18 Effect <strong>of</strong> Mechanization Practices on Economics <strong>of</strong><br />
Soyabean-Safflower Cropping System<br />
19 Effect <strong>of</strong> Nano-DAP Application in Combination<br />
with Conventional Fertilizers on Rice-Rapeseed<br />
Sequence under Rain-Fed Condition<br />
20 Effect <strong>of</strong> Nano fertilizers on Growth, Yield and<br />
Water Use Efficiency <strong>of</strong> Potato (Solanum<br />
tuberosum l.) under Varying Irrigation Schedules<br />
21 Soil Moisture and Weather Data Management Using<br />
IoT<br />
22 Comparative Study on Spatial and Temporal<br />
Changes in Urban Settlements and Land Surface<br />
Temperature in Hyderabad over 1990 to 2020<br />
23 Usefulness <strong>of</strong> Agro-Meteorological Advisory<br />
Service from Farmers Prospective in the NICRA<br />
Operated Villages <strong>of</strong> Godda District Jharkhand<br />
24 Use <strong>of</strong> UNEP Aridity Index for Drought Assessment<br />
in Bundelkhand<br />
25 FarmPrecise – An Agromet Advisory Service<br />
(AAS) for Sustainable Agriculture and Resilient<br />
Farm Income: An Impact Assessment <strong>of</strong> AAS in<br />
Ahmednagar, Dhule, and Jalna Districts <strong>of</strong><br />
Maharashtra<br />
26 Assessment <strong>of</strong> Biophysical Parameters and Disease<br />
Incidence in Mungbean Using Hyperspectral<br />
Radiometry<br />
27 Non-Destructive and Rapid Estimation <strong>of</strong> the Foliar<br />
Nitrogen <strong>of</strong> the Tomato Plant By Proximal<br />
Hyperspectral Remote Sensing Pl. Biochemical<br />
Properties: Nitrogen<br />
28 Assessment <strong>of</strong> Soil Fertility Constraints in<br />
Shrirampura Micro-Watershed, Turuvekere Taluk,<br />
Tumkur District, Karnataka Using Geospatial<br />
Techniques<br />
29 Assessing Impact <strong>of</strong> Dry Spells on Sorghum<br />
Productivity over Telangana State<br />
30 Investigations on Chopping-Cum-Tilling-Cum-<br />
Mixing Machine for Straw Incorporation<br />
31 Hyperspectral Reflectance: A Promising Tool to<br />
Assess the Metabolic Responses to Drought Stress<br />
in Sugarcane<br />
Sonia Sheoran<br />
SA Shinde<br />
Dhananjoy Dutta<br />
Manimala Mahato<br />
NS Raju<br />
Fawaz Parapurath<br />
Rajnish Prasad<br />
Rajesh<br />
Sunil Kumar<br />
Nikhil Nikam<br />
M Prabhakar<br />
Md Zafar<br />
KT Aruna<br />
Santanu Kumar<br />
Bal<br />
Abhishek patel<br />
Vinay Hegde<br />
T5-16P-1111<br />
T5-17P-1117<br />
T5-18P-1140<br />
T5-19P-1141<br />
T5-20P-1165<br />
T5-21P-1166<br />
T5-22P-1178<br />
T5-23P-1194<br />
T5-24P-1195<br />
T5-25P-1219<br />
T5-25P-1296<br />
T5-27P-1332<br />
T5-28P-1333<br />
T5-29P-1345<br />
T5-30P-1350<br />
695 | Page Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Title Title First Author ID<br />
32 Photo-Voltaic Solar Power: Alternative Energy for<br />
Farm Mechanization<br />
33 Design and Development <strong>of</strong> Planter for<br />
Intercropping Castor with Green Gram<br />
34 Leaf Propagation <strong>of</strong> Guava for Prevention <strong>of</strong> Root<br />
Knot Nematode<br />
35 Soil Moisture Indices Using Copernicus Soil Water<br />
Index for Drought Studies<br />
36 Soil Conservation Practices for Climate Change<br />
Adaptation in Bihar State<br />
37 Correlation <strong>of</strong> Weather Variables on the<br />
Development <strong>of</strong> Makhana Leaf Spot Disease in the<br />
Koshi Region <strong>of</strong> Bihar<br />
38 Study the Effect <strong>of</strong> Different Chemical on<br />
Biochemical and Functional Properties <strong>of</strong> Custard<br />
Apple (Annona squamosa L.) During Storage<br />
39 Cloud Computing, Data science for Big Data<br />
Management in Agriculture<br />
40 Feasibility <strong>of</strong> Appropriate Mechanization in<br />
Cultivation <strong>of</strong> Millets in Rainfed Eco System<br />
41 Small Scale Farm Mechanization: An Archangle to<br />
Climate Resilient Agriculture<br />
42 Predicting the generation index <strong>of</strong> groundnut<br />
bruchid, Caryedon serratus Olivier in India during<br />
future climate change scenario<br />
43 Indian Water Policy: Perspective <strong>of</strong> Rainwater<br />
Harvesting for Sustainability in Semi-Arid Regions<br />
Ravikant V Adake<br />
HS Chaudhary<br />
R Neelavathi<br />
KV Rao<br />
Pooja Jena<br />
Md Nadeem<br />
Akhtar<br />
Indraraj Ghasil<br />
R Lakshmi Sreya<br />
I Srinivas<br />
MV Tiwari<br />
TV Prasad<br />
K Sreenivas Reddy<br />
T5-31P-1373<br />
T5-32P-1379<br />
T5-33P-1417<br />
T5-34P-1491<br />
T5-35P-1528<br />
T5-36P-1535<br />
T5-37P-1538<br />
T5-38P-1589<br />
T5-39P-1598<br />
T5-40P-1711<br />
T5-41P-1616<br />
T5-42P-1621<br />
Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment<br />
696 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
T5-01O-1063<br />
Intercropping as ‘Ecological Precision Agriculture’ to Address Field<br />
Heterogeneity<br />
Iman Raj Chongtham*<br />
Department <strong>of</strong> Biosystems and Technology, Swedish University <strong>of</strong> Agricultural Sciences,<br />
Lomma 234 22, Sweden.<br />
*raj.chongtham@slu.se<br />
During the last century, agricultural intensification with high use <strong>of</strong> external inputs such as<br />
pesticides, mineral fertilizers and crops grown as mono/sole crops has increased food<br />
production. However, such simplified and resource intensive agricultural practices are<br />
associated with causing environmental problems, notably biodiversity loss, development <strong>of</strong><br />
resistance to pesticides, climate change, and eutrophication (Gliessman, 2014). Dependence on<br />
one crop and external inputs can increase vulnerability <strong>of</strong> cropping system to natural disasters<br />
such as drought, the current COVID-19 pandemic (e.g. disruptions in supply chains) and high<br />
input prices due to conflicts (e.g. in Ukraine). Furthermore, crop production in organic systems<br />
is quite challenging as they have high spatial and temporal yield variability. Organic farmers<br />
have limited ‘quick and easy’ solutions such as chemical pesticides and fertilizers to deal with<br />
problems compared to conventional farmers (Chongtham et al., 2016). Intercropping (IC) can<br />
potentially address several <strong>of</strong> these challenges.<br />
Jensen et al. (2015) considered intercropping <strong>of</strong> non-legume crops (such as cereals) with grain<br />
legumes as an ‘ecological precision agriculture’ concept since the intercrop in a specific site<br />
will adjust its botanical composition, performances and acquisition <strong>of</strong> N from soil and fixation<br />
from atmosphere according to available soil mineral N by competitive interactions. This<br />
concept can be related to ‘stress gradient hypothesis’ in Ecology (Bertness and Callaway,<br />
1994), which assumes that the outcome <strong>of</strong> plant-plant interactions is dictated by environmental<br />
conditions, i.e. in harsh environment (e.g., from temperature or grazing) there will be more<br />
positive plant-plant interactions. However, there is lack <strong>of</strong> knowledge on the degree to which<br />
field-scale soil variability affects the competitive interactions between the IC components and<br />
use <strong>of</strong> available resources.<br />
This study aims to understand if intercropping can adapt to field heterogeneity more efficiently<br />
than their respective sole crops (SC) by suppressing weeds and producing higher and more<br />
stable yields.<br />
Methodology<br />
On alarge field with heterogeneous soil conditions, we measured soil ECa using EM-38 device.<br />
Based on this data, strips <strong>of</strong> crops: SC oat, SC pea and IC oat-pea (50%:50% seeding<br />
697 | Page Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
proportion) were laid along the field slope gradient. Strips were replicated five times in a<br />
randomised block design. Each strip was subdivided into 10 grids (along slope, N-S) and soil<br />
and crop measurements/samples were taken from the centroids <strong>of</strong> each grid, which were<br />
marked with gps (Fig. 1).Soil samples were analysed for soil texture, nitrogen, carbon and<br />
pH.Crops were sown at recommended seeding density: i.e. 320 plants per sq.m for SC oat, 80<br />
plants per sq.m for SC pea and half the seeding density <strong>of</strong> each crop in the intercrops. All<br />
treatments were applied 50 kg/ha <strong>of</strong> mineral N fertiliser, without any irrigation and other<br />
agrochemicals. At maturity, plant samples from 1 sq.m were hand-harvested from all the<br />
centroids and oven-dried for estimating grain and biomass weights.<br />
Results<br />
The study site received only 30mm <strong>of</strong> precipitation during 01 May-01 August in 2018, which<br />
was about one-fourth <strong>of</strong> the average precipitation during this period. This affected the crops,<br />
specially the pea. At harvest, oat yield tended to be higher in areas with high soil ECa values<br />
(conductivity).<br />
Plot layout on ECa map; Dry matter oat grain yield in Kg/ha on soil N heat map.<br />
In areas with low soil N content, IC seemed to have advantage over SC in terms <strong>of</strong> oat yield.<br />
On the other hand, yields <strong>of</strong> IC treatments tended to be equal or lower than SC oat yield in<br />
areas with high soil N content (Fig. 2). Average oat grain yield from all sampling points in IC<br />
was 2.6±1.65 t/ha (mean ± SD), despite having only 50% <strong>of</strong> the sole crop density, compared<br />
to 3.07±2.24 t/ha in oat SC strips. This corresponds to about 78% <strong>of</strong> SC yield. The highest<br />
weed biomass <strong>of</strong> 5.86 t/ha was recorded in SC pea, while the lowest weed in SC Oat (0.97<br />
t/ha). The IC treatment recorded a weed biomass <strong>of</strong> 3.27 t/ha.<br />
Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment<br />
698 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Dry matter weed biomass at harvest in t/ha<br />
Treatment emmean SE df Lower. CL Upper. CL Group<br />
SC Oat 0.97 0.22 139 0.54 1.41 1<br />
IC Oat-Pea 3.27 0.22 139 2.84 3.70 2<br />
SC Pea 5.86 0.21 139 5.43 6.28 3<br />
Conclusion<br />
Despite the pea crop failure due to drought, the oat yield in IC was about 78% <strong>of</strong> SC. IC reduced<br />
the vulnerability to weather extremes through complementarity function and crop<br />
diversification. High compensatory yield in IC inlow soil N areas may be attributed to<br />
compensation potential <strong>of</strong> intercrop partners. IC <strong>of</strong> oilseed rape and pea in a heterogeneous<br />
field is currently being tested by the authors.<br />
References<br />
Bertness M and Callaway RM. 1994. Positive interactions in communities. Trends Ecol. Evol.<br />
9.<br />
Chongtham IR, Bergkvist G, Watson CA, Sandstrom E, Bengtsson J and Oborn I. 2016. Factors<br />
influencing crop rotation strategies on organic farms with different time periods since<br />
conversion to organic production. Biol. Agric. Hortic. 33, 14–27.<br />
Gliessman SR. 2014. Agroeoclogy: the ecology <strong>of</strong> sustainable food systems, CRC press.<br />
Jensen ES, Bedoussac L, Carlsson G, Etienne-Pascal J, Justes E and Hauggaard-Nielsen H.<br />
2015. Enhancing yields in organic crop production by eco-functional intensification.<br />
Sustain. Agric. Res., 4 (3), 42-50.<br />
T5-02O-1343<br />
Performance <strong>of</strong> Soybean, Pigeonpea Strip Cropping under Complete<br />
Mechanization for Rainfed Area <strong>of</strong> Marathwada Region<br />
W. N. Narkhede, B. V. Asewar, M. S. Pendke, R. S. Raut, D. P. Waskar and<br />
A. S. Gunjkar<br />
All India Coordinated Research Project for Dryland Agriculture, Vasantrao Naik<br />
Marathwada Krishi Vidyapeeth, Parbhani (Maharashtra) India 431 402<br />
Strip cropping is a form <strong>of</strong> intercropping in which different crop species are cultivated in<br />
adjacent strips, allowing for independent, mechanical cultivation <strong>of</strong> each species. The strips<br />
are wide enough to be managed independently, yet they are narrow enough to allow crops that<br />
are rotated annually to influence the micro climate and yield potential <strong>of</strong> adjacent crops (Van<br />
1994). Strip intercropping can bring important agronomic and environmental benefits.<br />
699 | Page Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Temporal and spatial variation in strip-cropping plants minimizes competition between them<br />
and increase yield, and pr<strong>of</strong>itability. It reduces soil loss from wind and water erosion and<br />
reduce mineral leaching losses. than most mono cropping operations (Cruse1990). With this<br />
view, to minimize the labor requirement and increase the pr<strong>of</strong>itability, the experiment was<br />
conducted to study the various strip cropping for soybean and pigeonpea crops under<br />
mechanization with suitable ratio and to work out the economics feasibility <strong>of</strong> the strip<br />
cropping under mechanization<br />
Methodology<br />
The field experiment was conducted in randomized block design with eight treatments and<br />
three replications at Research Farm, AICRP on Dryland Agriculture, Vasantrao Naik<br />
Marathwada Krishi Vidyapeeth, Parbhani during Kharif 2018-20 and 2021-22. The treatments<br />
were allotted randomly in each replication. The recommended dose <strong>of</strong> fertilizer was applied<br />
to crop. Soybean and pigeonpea were sown at 45 cm X 5 cm and 90 cm X 20 cm respectively.<br />
A complete seed to seed mechanization was done in the experiment. The treatments were T 1-<br />
soybean: pigeonpea strip <strong>of</strong> 6:3 rows, T2- soybean: pigeonpea strip <strong>of</strong> 6:6 rows, T3- soybean:<br />
pigeonpea strip <strong>of</strong> 12:9 rows , T 4- soybean: pigeonpea strip <strong>of</strong> 12:12 rows ,T 5- soybean:<br />
pigeonpea strip <strong>of</strong> 18:12 rows T6- soybean: pigeonpea (4:2) intercropping system , T7- Sole<br />
soybean and T8- Sole pigeon pea.<br />
Results<br />
Sole pigeon pea recorded significantly higher soybean equivalent yield (2366 kg/ha.) which<br />
was followed by soybean + pigeon pea strip <strong>of</strong> 18:12 rows (1973 Kg/ha) and soybean +<br />
pigeonpea strip <strong>of</strong> 12:12 rows (1918 Kg/ha). Highest gross monetary return (GMR) were<br />
recorded in sole pigeonpea (Rs. 87244 /ha) which was followed by soybean + pigeonpea strip<br />
<strong>of</strong> 18:12 rows and soybean + pigeonpea strip <strong>of</strong> 12:12 rows. Significantly highest net monetary<br />
returns (NMR) were observed in sole pigeonpea (Rs. 57589 /ha.) which was followed by<br />
soybean + pigeonpea strip <strong>of</strong> 18:12 row (Rs. 48075 /ha). Sole pigeonpea recorded highest<br />
rainwater use efficiency (3.8) and B: C ratio (2.6) followed by in the treatment <strong>of</strong> soybean +<br />
pigeonpea strip <strong>of</strong> 18:12 row.<br />
The increase in the monetary returns due to increased yield and saving in cost <strong>of</strong> operation<br />
because <strong>of</strong> mechanization in soybean and pigeon pea was reported by Dhakad and Khedkar<br />
(2014). Strip-cropping can improve yields, pr<strong>of</strong>it margins Ghosh (2004).<br />
Conclusion<br />
Sole pigeon pea recorded significantly higher soybean seed yield, GMR, NMR and RWUE,<br />
Whereas, soybean + pigeon pea strip <strong>of</strong> 18.9 m each (18 & 12 rows/strip) recorded significantly<br />
higher B:C ratio.<br />
Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment<br />
700 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Soybean equivalent yield, GMR, NMR, BC ratio and RWUE<br />
Treatments<br />
T 1<br />
Soybean + Pigeon pea Strip <strong>of</strong> 5.4 m<br />
each (6 & 3 rows/strip)<br />
T 2<br />
Soybean + Pigeon pea Strip <strong>of</strong> 8.1 m each<br />
(6 & 6rows/strip)<br />
T 3<br />
Soybean + Pigeon pea Strip <strong>of</strong> 13.5 m<br />
each (12 & 9 rows/strip)<br />
T 4<br />
Soybean + Pigeon pea Strip <strong>of</strong> 16.2 m<br />
each (12 & 12 rows/strip)<br />
T 5<br />
Soybean + Pigeon pea Strip <strong>of</strong> 18.9 m<br />
each (18 & 12 rows/strip)<br />
T 6<br />
Soybean + Pigeon pea Strip at 4:2. rows<br />
intercropping system<br />
Soybean<br />
Equivalent<br />
yield<br />
(kg ha -1 )<br />
GMR<br />
(₹ ha -1 )<br />
NMR<br />
(₹ ha -1 )<br />
B:C<br />
ratio<br />
RWUE<br />
(kg/mm/ha)<br />
1697 60348 39891 2.5 2.7<br />
1853 69273 46964 2.7 3.0<br />
1723 62756 38860 2.3 2.8<br />
1918 70963 46723 2.5 3.1<br />
1973 73763 48075 2.5 3.1<br />
1350 47679 27264 2.1 2.2<br />
T 7<br />
Soybean Sole 1049 38754 18328 1.8 1.7<br />
T 8<br />
pigeonpea Sole 2366 87244 57589 2.6 3.8<br />
SE + 98 3460 2444 2.8<br />
CD (P= 0.05) 296 10386 7337 2.7<br />
C.V. 12 10.25 9.68 9.65<br />
Mean 1744 68274 44713 2.86 2.54<br />
References<br />
Cruse, R. M. and Weber, A. 1990. Strip intercropping. In Farming Systems for Iowa: Seeking<br />
Alternatives - Leopold Center for Sustainable Agriculture. Conference Proceedings.<br />
pp. 39-41.<br />
Dhakad, S. S. and Khedkar, N. S. 2014. Influence <strong>of</strong> seed-cum-fertilizer drill machine on the<br />
growth characters and yield <strong>of</strong> soybean (Glycine max. L. Merill.) at farmer’s fields.<br />
Int. J. For. Crop Imprvt., 5 (2): 68-72.<br />
Ghosh PK. 2004. Groundnut/cereal fodder intercropping systems in the semiarid tropics <strong>of</strong><br />
India. Field Crops Res., 88: 227–37.<br />
701 | Page Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
T5-03O-1210<br />
Real Time Monitoring and Management <strong>of</strong> Drought in Groundnut<br />
Sahadeva Reddy, A. Malliswara Reddy, K. Ashok Kumar, K.V.S. Sudheer,<br />
C. Radha Kumari, C. Yasmin, Ch. Murali Krishna, S. N. Malleswari and<br />
G. Ravindra Chary<br />
AICRP for Dryland Agriculture, Agricultural Research Station,<br />
Acharya N G Ranga Agricultural University, Ananthapuramu-515001, Andhra Pradesh<br />
Rainfed agriculture is likely to be more vulnerable to climate change because <strong>of</strong> its high<br />
dependency on monsoon and the chances <strong>of</strong> increased extreme weather events like delayed<br />
onset <strong>of</strong> monsoon, high intensity rainfall (wet spells), seasonal drought, early withdrawal <strong>of</strong><br />
monsoon etc. due to aberrant behaviour <strong>of</strong> south-west (SW) monsoon. Almost 56 per cent <strong>of</strong><br />
cropped area in Andhra Pradesh is under rainfed conditions where crop yields are largely<br />
influenced by the vagaries <strong>of</strong> the weather. Ananthapuramu region in the southern part <strong>of</strong><br />
Andhra Pradesh is the driest part <strong>of</strong> the state, climatically classified as arid zone and receives<br />
an annual precipitation <strong>of</strong> 553 mm against the atmospheric water demand (PET) <strong>of</strong> 2128 mm.<br />
Despite such precarious conditions, the area under groundnut is increasing and at present it is<br />
being cultivated in an extent <strong>of</strong> 5.0 lakh ha. Among the abiotic stresses, drought (moisture<br />
stress) is the major factor influencing the yield <strong>of</strong> rainfed crops. Variation in crop yields is more<br />
in dry lands due to the nonreceipt <strong>of</strong> timely rainfall and prolonged dry spells during crop<br />
periods. Monsoon failures results in drought which has serious implications for small and<br />
marginal farmers and livelihoods <strong>of</strong> the rural poor. Any contingency measure, either<br />
technology related (land, soil, water, crop) or institutional and policy based, which is<br />
implemented based on real time weather pattern (including extreme events) in any crop<br />
growing season is considered as real time contingency planning. Hence, this experiment on<br />
real time drought monitoring and management was planned for adapting to current climate<br />
risks and will help in getting higher yields.<br />
Methodology<br />
Field experiments were conducted at AICRPDA, Agricultural Research Station,<br />
Ananthapuramu (latitude <strong>of</strong> 14°41′ N, longitude <strong>of</strong> 77°40′ E and altitude <strong>of</strong> 350 meters above<br />
mean sea level) during kharif from 2019 to 2021 in rainfed Alfisols. The two treatments<br />
consist <strong>of</strong> Real time drought management (RTDM) with proven contingency measures during<br />
early, mid-season, terminal drought and rainfed (control) in groundnut (VarietyK6). Each<br />
treatment was laid out in an area <strong>of</strong> 1000 m 2 . The initial soil fertility was low in organic carbon<br />
(0.20%), low in available nitrogen (140 kg ha -1 ), high in available phosphorous (107 kg ha -1 )<br />
and low in available potassium (98 kg ha -1 ). Under RTDM in groundnut subsoiling @ 1m<br />
distance before sowing once in two years (2019 and 2021), formation <strong>of</strong> conservation furrows<br />
Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment<br />
702 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
@ 3.6 m interval @ 30 DAS in all three years, KNO3 spray @ 0.5% at dry spell at pegging<br />
stage during 2019 and supplemental irrigation with sprinklers with harvested rain water@ 20<br />
mm at pod initiation stage during 2021 was done. An amount <strong>of</strong> 517, 888 and 378 mm rainfall<br />
in 25,61 and 27 rainy days was received during the crop season <strong>of</strong> 2019, 2020 and 2021<br />
respectively. The rainwater use efficiency (RWUE, kg ha -1 mm -1 ) was derived as ratio <strong>of</strong> yield<br />
(kg ha -1 ) attained by a crop and crop seasonal rainfall (mm) <strong>of</strong> the respective crop in each year.<br />
The cost <strong>of</strong> cultivation <strong>of</strong> each crop was determined by considering inputs like seed and<br />
fertilizer costs and agricultural operations from sowing to harvest. The gross returns were<br />
computed as a product <strong>of</strong> yield <strong>of</strong> a crop and its market price (Rs. kg -1 ). The benefit-cost ratio<br />
was computed as a ratio <strong>of</strong> gross returns and cost <strong>of</strong> cultivation for each crop.<br />
Results<br />
During the three years <strong>of</strong> study, real time monitoring and management <strong>of</strong> drought in groundnut,<br />
recorded higher pod, haulm yield, gross, net returns, benefit cost ratio and rain water use<br />
efficiency as compared to rainfed (control). RTDM practice enhanced the pod and haulm yields<br />
by 31 and 23, 38.8 and 21.2 and 25.8 and 14.9 per cent respectively during 2019, 2020 and<br />
2021 respectively compared to control. This might be due to RTDM practice recorded higher<br />
soil moisture content and relative water content in different phenophases <strong>of</strong> groundnut. Higher<br />
yields were mainly due to increased availability <strong>of</strong> soil moisture by conservation <strong>of</strong> rainfall<br />
with deep tillage, conservation furrows and supplemental irrigation at critical stages <strong>of</strong> crop<br />
growth.<br />
Effect <strong>of</strong> Real time drought management (RTDM) practices in groundnut during kharif<br />
<strong>of</strong> 2019 to 2021<br />
Parameter 2019 2020 2021<br />
RTDM Control RTDM Control RTDM Control<br />
Pod yield (kg ha -1 ) 1660 1267 705 508 1370 1089<br />
Haulm yield (kg ha -1 ) 2985 2435 2360 1950 2245 1954<br />
Cost <strong>of</strong> cultivation (Rs. ha -1 ) 31250 27500 31750 28000 32250 29500<br />
Gross Returns (Rs. ha -1 ) 97932 75521 48460 36166 79725 64220<br />
Net Returns (Rs. ha -1 ) 66682 48021 16710 8166 47475 34720<br />
B:C ratio 3.13 2.75 1.52 1.29 2.47 2.18<br />
RWUE (kg ha -1 mm -1 ) 3.38 2.58 1.40 1.01 3.89 3.09<br />
Conclusion<br />
Real time monitoring and management <strong>of</strong> drought with subsoiling @1 m distance before sowing once<br />
in two years, formation <strong>of</strong> conservation furrows @ 3.6 m interval @ 30 DAS, KNO 3 spray @ 0.5% at<br />
dry spell and supplemental irrigation with sprinklers with harvested rain water @ 20 mm at pod<br />
development stage increases the pod yield, gross and net returns in ground growing areas <strong>of</strong> scarce<br />
rainfall zone.<br />
703 | Page Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment<br />
T5-03aO-1041<br />
Big Data Analytics for Identifying Districts with Untapped Potential in<br />
Rainfed Agriculture and Bridging Gaps<br />
B. M. K. Raju*, C. A. Rama Rao, R. Nagarjuna Kumar, K. V. Rao, V. K. Singh,<br />
Josily Samuel, A. V. M. Subba Rao, M. Osman and N. Swapna<br />
ICAR-Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, Santoshnagar, Hyderabad-500059<br />
* bmkraju@yahoo.com<br />
Government <strong>of</strong> India set a target <strong>of</strong> doubling farmers income by 2022-23. Niti Aayog target that onethird<br />
<strong>of</strong> the enhanced income should be contributed by yield increase. Other compelling forces for yield<br />
expansion in India are food & nutritional security and burden <strong>of</strong> importing oilseeds and pulses.<br />
Enhancing the productivities in rainfed agriculture is important from the perspective <strong>of</strong> inclusive<br />
agricultural growth. Climate, soil, irrigation and season (kharif/rabi) are the key drivers <strong>of</strong> productivity<br />
<strong>of</strong> a crop in a region. Farmer has no choice towards climate and soil while the factors <strong>of</strong> access to<br />
irrigation and season in which the crop is grown are relatively less amenable to changes. On the other<br />
hand, farmer has choice in case <strong>of</strong> factors like adoption <strong>of</strong> technologies such as improved variety,<br />
nutrient management, etc., which are relatively more amenable at farm level with appropriate policy<br />
and other interventions. If major districts <strong>of</strong> a crop are divided into clusters homogeneous in terms <strong>of</strong><br />
climate, soil, share <strong>of</strong> irrigated area under the crop and growing season the differences in productivity<br />
within the cluster can be majorly attributed to the factors that are amenable to changes. As the resources<br />
(that farmer has less or no choice) for raising the crop within a cluster are more or less same, the district<br />
producing highest yield in a cluster may be regarded as potential target and its yield as potential yield<br />
for the remaining districts in the cluster. Untapped yield potential (yield gap) for a district may be<br />
computed as the difference between potential yield and yield <strong>of</strong> the district (Raju et al., 2018). It is<br />
important to identify crop-wise districts where potential exists for yield growth in rainfed agriculture<br />
and explore the ways to bridge the gaps in order to achieve inclusive agricultural growth in India.<br />
Methodology<br />
Twenty important crops covering cereals, pulses, oilseeds and commercial crops are included in the<br />
study. Multivariate cluster analysis has been used for dividing major districts <strong>of</strong> a crop into clusters.<br />
The clustering variables used are moisture index, available water holding capacity <strong>of</strong> soil, per cent<br />
irrigated area under the crop and share <strong>of</strong> a particular season in area under the crop at district level.<br />
Moisture index (MI) was considered as a summarised indicator <strong>of</strong> various climatic variables. Available<br />
water holding capacity (AWHC) <strong>of</strong> the soil was considered as a summary indicator <strong>of</strong> soil properties<br />
such as soil texture and soil depth (Raju et al., 2015). Before carrying out the analysis, the clustering<br />
variables were standardized using mean and standard deviation. Ward’s agglomerative hierarchical<br />
clustering algorithm was employed to derive clusters from distance matrix computed using squared<br />
euclidean distance if the number <strong>of</strong> major districts is less than 200. K means clustering algorithm on<br />
euclidean distance was used in case <strong>of</strong> rice and wheat which were having more than 200 major districts.<br />
The analysis was carried out using SPSS. Criterion used for determining the number <strong>of</strong> clusters was to<br />
increase the number <strong>of</strong> clusters sequentially (one at a time) till share <strong>of</strong> intra-cluster variation goes<br />
704 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
below 5%. Yield efficiency <strong>of</strong> a district in a given crop is computed as the ratio <strong>of</strong> untapped yield and<br />
potential yield. Yield efficiency <strong>of</strong> less than 0.5 indicates scope for doubling <strong>of</strong> yield in the district. For<br />
each crop, the clusters <strong>of</strong> districts for which mean area under irrigation (as a percent <strong>of</strong> sown area) was<br />
less than 25% were considered as rainfed. Let Z is the rainfed yield efficiency <strong>of</strong> jth district with<br />
respect to ith crop predominantly cultivated under rainfed conditions then Overall Rainfed Yield<br />
Efficiency <strong>of</strong> jth district is Z = ∑ W Z where W ij = Proportion <strong>of</strong> area sown to i th crop<br />
(considering the crops which are predominantly cultivated under rainfed conditions) in j th district such<br />
that ∑ W = 1 (for all j).<br />
Results<br />
The resultant map showing overall rainfed yield efficiency at district level has been given as Fig 1. The<br />
number <strong>of</strong> districts having rainfed yield efficiency less than 0.5 are more in Madhya Pradesh (10),<br />
Rajasthan (8), Jharkhand (8), Tamil Nadu (6) and Orissa (5) states. Aggregate rainfed yield in these<br />
districts can be doubled. The variation in factors <strong>of</strong> crop management such as consumption <strong>of</strong> fertilizer<br />
nutrients <strong>of</strong> Nitrogen (N), Phosphorous (P) and Potassium (K) and adoption <strong>of</strong> technology such as extent<br />
<strong>of</strong> use <strong>of</strong> High Yielding Varieties (HYV) in the crop at district level are found to explain the variation<br />
in yield within a cluster to a large extent. Strategies were identified to improve yield efficiency in 60<br />
districts found to have low rainfed yield efficiency based on crop-wise gaps in adoption <strong>of</strong> HYV and<br />
nutrient use. A decision support system (DSS) has been developed which brings out untapped yield<br />
potential for a selected crop in a district. The DSS identifies 3 model districts and displays information<br />
on extent <strong>of</strong> adoption <strong>of</strong> HYVs and nutrient use in them indicating strategies for bridging yield gap in<br />
selected crop <strong>of</strong> the district. The DSS has been hosted on ICAR-CRIDA website at http://www.icarcrida.res.in:8129/.<br />
Overall rainfed yield efficiency at district level (with 20 crops)<br />
705 | Page Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Conclusion<br />
This study provides some inputs for formulation <strong>of</strong> policy for bridging the yield gaps existing in several<br />
districts practicing rainfed agriculture which eventually helps in reducing the burden <strong>of</strong> importing<br />
oilseeds and pulses and addressing the threatening food and nutrition security in India.<br />
References<br />
Raju, B.M.K., Osman, M., Venkateswarlu, B., Rao, A.V.M.S., Rao, K.V., Mishra, P.K., Rama<br />
Rao, C.A., Kareemulla, K., Anil Rai, Bhatia, V.K., Prachi Misra Sahoo, Malhotra, P.K.,<br />
Sikka, A.K., Swapna, N. and Latha, P., 2015. Prioritization <strong>of</strong> rainfed areas in India<br />
based on natural resource endowments. Journal <strong>of</strong> the Indian Society <strong>of</strong> Agricultural<br />
Statistics, 69(1), 83-93.<br />
Raju, B.M.K., Rama Rao, C.A., Rao, K.V., Srinivasa Rao, Ch., Josily Samuel, Subba Rao, A.V.M.,<br />
Osman, M., Srinivasa Rao, M., Ravi Kumar, N., Nagarjuna Kumar, R., Sumanth Kumar, V.V.,<br />
Gopinath, K.A. and Swapna, N., 2018. Assessing unrealized yield potential <strong>of</strong> maize producing<br />
districts in India. Current Science,114 (9), 1885-1893.<br />
Raju, B.M.K., Rao, K.V., Venkateswarlu, B., Rao, A.V.M.S., Rama Rao, C.A., Rao, V.U.M., Bapuji<br />
Rao, B., Ravi Kumar, N., Dhakar, R., Swapna, N. and Latha, P., 2013. Revisiting climatic<br />
classification in India: a district-level analysis. Current Science, 105 (4), 492-495.<br />
T5-04R-1019<br />
A Mobile app for Unreaped Yield Potentials <strong>of</strong> Major Rainfed Crops and<br />
Scope for Bridging Yield Gaps - A Decision Support System<br />
R. Nagarjuna Kumar*, B. M. K. Raju, C. A. Rama Rao, Josily Samuel,<br />
A. V. M. Subbarao, M. Srinivas Rao, G. Nirmala, N. S. Raju and V. K. Singh<br />
ICAR-Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, Hyderabad-500059, Telangana, India<br />
*nagarjunakumar191@gmail.com<br />
Bridging yield gaps is recognized as an important element <strong>of</strong> the strategy for raising<br />
productivity and farm incomes. Identifying and targeting districts, the administrative units at<br />
which most <strong>of</strong> the development planning and resource allocation is done in the country, where<br />
considerable yield gaps exist will be useful in planning interventions needed. With this,<br />
districts with considerable yield gaps were identified (Raju et al., 2013,2018) and was made<br />
available in the form <strong>of</strong> a Decision Support System (DSS)(http://www.icar-crida.res.in:8129/.).<br />
In this scenario, it is expected that integration <strong>of</strong> ICTs in agricultural extension will provide<br />
needed impetus to agricultural sector and ICTs can complement the traditional extension<br />
system for “Knowledge Resource” delivery to the millions <strong>of</strong> the farmers (Saravanan, 2010).<br />
To facilitate this mobile based technology dissemination in agriculture provides significant<br />
opportunity for farmers and extension workers to work together more effectively. Mobile<br />
Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment<br />
706 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
phone‐enabled information delivery mechanism can help to meet the information needs <strong>of</strong><br />
small farmers by reducing their knowledge gaps. Therefore, a mobile app for Unreaped Yield<br />
Potentials <strong>of</strong> Major Rainfed Crops and Scope for Bridging Yield Gaps ‘was developed based<br />
on developed DSS. It is very useful for the policy makers, researchers, extension workers.<br />
Methodology<br />
It is an android-based app. The database <strong>of</strong> the app has been designed using SQlite. User<br />
Interfaces were designed. Integrated all the menus and database. This App has been tested with<br />
different datasets and evaluated for its user-friendly environment. The App accommodated 17<br />
rainfed crops viz., rice, sorghum, pearlmillet, maize, fingermillet, chickpea, pigeonpea,<br />
blackgram, greengram, lentil, groundnut, soybean, sunflower, sesame, rapeseed & mustard,<br />
castor and cotton. User has to select a crop and a district cultivating the crop.<br />
Results<br />
The App lists the model districts for a given crop and target District and indicates possible crop<br />
management for bridging yield gap. The App identifies 3 model districts having climate, soil,<br />
share <strong>of</strong> irrigated area under the crop and share <strong>of</strong> a particular season in area under the crop<br />
similar to the district (target) selected.<br />
The APP provides climate and available water holding capacity (AWHC) <strong>of</strong> soil <strong>of</strong> the district,<br />
area under the crop and share <strong>of</strong> irrigated area and share <strong>of</strong> a particular season (in case <strong>of</strong> rice,<br />
sorghum, maize, blackgram and greengram) in area under the crop and yield <strong>of</strong> the district in<br />
the crop. It further provides yield achieved by model districts. If the target district itself is the<br />
highest yielding district in the cluster, a remark to this effect is generated. If there are only 1 or<br />
2 districts with yield more than that <strong>of</strong> target district in a cluster, only those districts will be<br />
listed as model districts. The highest yield among the model districts may be regarded potential<br />
yield. To explore other possible causes <strong>of</strong> yield gap, information on non-crop specific factors<br />
such as small and marginal farmers (% total farmers), annual rainfall (mm), degraded and waste<br />
lands (% geographical area), groundwater availability (ha m/ sq km), livestock population<br />
(ACU/sq km), rural literacy (%), villages having self-help groups (%), net irrigated area (% net<br />
sown area), villages with all-weather roads (%), households with electricity (%), regulated<br />
markets (No. / lakh holdings), drought proneness (% probability in terms <strong>of</strong> severe drought),<br />
flood proneness (% area) and cyclone proneness (score on 0-10 scale) were provided for target<br />
district and 3 model districts. The output can be downloaded as word file or in Excel sheet<br />
format for further use. The output <strong>of</strong> mobile app is shown below.<br />
707 | Page Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Conclusion<br />
The output <strong>of</strong> Mobile App<br />
The spread <strong>of</strong> mobile telephony is a significant opportunity for farmers, extension workers and<br />
other stakeholders to work together more effectively. The mobile app ‘Unreaped Yield<br />
Potentials <strong>of</strong> Major Rainfed Crops and Scope for Bridging Yield Gaps’ was developed<br />
indicates possible crop management for bridging yield gap. which can help the policy makers,<br />
researchers, extension workers.<br />
References<br />
Raju, B. M. K., Rao, K.V., Venkateswarlu B., Rao, A. V. M. S., Rama Rao C.A., Rao, V. U. M., Bapuji<br />
Rao B, Ravi Kumar N., Dhakar R., Swapna, N., and Latha, P. 2013. Revisiting climatic<br />
classification in India: a district-level analysis. Curr. Sci. 105 (4), 492-495.<br />
Raju B. M. K., Rama Rao C. A., Rao, K.V., Srinivasa Rao, Ch., Josily Samuel, Subba Rao A. V. M.,<br />
Osman M, Srinivasa Rao, M., Ravi Kumar N., Nagarjuna Kumar R., Sumanth Kumar V.V,<br />
Gopinath, K. A. and Swapna, N. 2018. Assessing unrealized yield potential <strong>of</strong> maize producing<br />
districts in India. Curr. Sci 114 (9), 1885-1893.<br />
NSSO, (2005). Access to modern technology for farming, situation assessment survey <strong>of</strong> farmers, 59th<br />
Round. Report No. 499, National Sample Survey Organisation (NSSO), Ministry <strong>of</strong> Statistics<br />
and Programme Implementation, Government <strong>of</strong> India, New Delhi.<br />
Saravanan R. 2010. ICTs for Agricultural Extension: Global Experiments, Innovations and<br />
Experiences. New India Publishing Agency, New Delhi.<br />
Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment<br />
708 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
T5-05R-1330<br />
PASM Induced Yield Variability in Soybean Crop at Akola conditions<br />
A. R. Tupe * , A. P. Karunakar, M. M. Ganvir, A. B. Chorey, R. S. Patode,<br />
V. V. Gabhane , S. T. Morey and R. S. Mali<br />
Dr. Panjabrao Deshmukh Krishi Vidyapeeth, Akola -444 104 (Maharashtra)<br />
*tupearvind@rediffmail.com<br />
Drought <strong>of</strong> different magnitude is becoming a common phenomenon, which affects adversely<br />
on Indian agriculture. Available soil moisture is a very relevant indicator <strong>of</strong> drought, especially<br />
in rainfed region. Soil moisture-based indices could be calculated using a simple region wide<br />
soil moisture balance methodology which entails collecting some <strong>of</strong> the base line data related<br />
to soil properties, climatic parameters and crop growth pattern, basically, soil moisture balance<br />
calculates the amount <strong>of</strong> rainfall available to crops depending upon crop water requirement,<br />
climatic evaporation demand and soil water holding capacity. It is suggested that one <strong>of</strong> the<br />
soil moisture based indices viz., Percent Available Soil Moisture (PASM) is used. These<br />
indices may be calculated at weekly interval and averages over dominant crop growth stages<br />
such as vegetative, flowering and pod development. These indices should be combined with<br />
other indicators for the determination <strong>of</strong> drought.<br />
Methodology<br />
A field experiment was initiated on the research field <strong>of</strong> AICRP for Dryland Agriculture, Dr.<br />
Panjabrao Deshmukh Krishi Vidyapeeth, Akola, Maharashtra since 2010 to 2018. Experiment<br />
was conducted in a factorial randomized block design with four replications. The treatment<br />
under study were four dates <strong>of</strong> sowing times in deferent Meteorological weeks such as 26 th MW,<br />
27 th MW, 28 th MW, 29 st MW and three cultivar such as JS-335, JS-9305, TAMS-98-21 was sown<br />
at a spacing <strong>of</strong> 45x5 cm. the gross plot size 5 x 4.5 m and net plot size was 3.6 x 4.6 m. All the<br />
recommended agronomic practices were adopted during the experimental period.<br />
The data on the occurrence <strong>of</strong> specific phenophagical stages <strong>of</strong> soybean observed during the<br />
experimental period in the three cultivars under different growing environment and soil<br />
moisture at different depth to assess the effect <strong>of</strong> soil moisture on different growth stages and<br />
final seed yield. Long term Crop - weather and moisture depletion pattern in soybean shown<br />
that the Percent Available Soil Moisture (PASM) should not go below 50 percent for normal<br />
crop growth. The results shows that relationship between PASM (%) and Soybean seed yield<br />
(Kg/ha) for the year 2008-2018.<br />
709 | Page Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Crop Situation based indices<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Percent Available Soil Moisture (PASM)<br />
PASM = [(SMW - PWP) / (FC – PWP)] * 100<br />
SMw : weekly soil moisture (vol/vol)<br />
FC: Field capacity <strong>of</strong> soil vol/vol<br />
PWP: Permanent wilting point <strong>of</strong> soil (vol/vol)<br />
Frequency: weekly<br />
Initiation: with the dates <strong>of</strong> actual sowing<br />
Averaging: over dominant crop growth stages, viz., vegetative growth, flowering and<br />
pod development stage<br />
Level <strong>of</strong> PASM<br />
Results<br />
PASM (%)<br />
Agricultural Drought Class<br />
76 - 100 No drought<br />
51 - 75 Mild drought<br />
26 – 50 Moderate drought<br />
0 – 25 Severe drought<br />
Soil water content, phonological characteristics yield, and yield components <strong>of</strong> soybean were<br />
collected. The long-term field experiments (2008- 2018) were conducted in soybean to study<br />
the relationship <strong>of</strong> per cent available soil moisture (PASM) on seed yield. Level <strong>of</strong> the PASM<br />
were classified as severe, moderate, mild and no drought based on the yield performance <strong>of</strong> the<br />
crop. The analyzed results indicated that at vegetative stage the lowest seed yield recorded i.e.<br />
597 kg/ha at 12 PASM treated as severe drought class whereas highest seed yield i.e. 1925<br />
kg/ha at 66 PASM treated as mild drought. At flowering stage the lowest seed yield recorded<br />
i.e. 1040 kg/ha at 14 PASM treated as severe drought class whereas highest seed yield i.e. 1719<br />
kg/ha at 60 PASM treated as mild drought and at pod development stage the lowest seed yield<br />
recorded i.e. 702 kg/ha at 11 PASM treated as severe drought class whereas highest seed yield<br />
i.e. 1896 kg/ha at 64 PASM treated as mild drought. The PASM values recorded at different<br />
stage <strong>of</strong> soybean indicated that moderate drought class gave 40 % <strong>of</strong> optimum yield during<br />
vegetative stage <strong>of</strong> the crop. From the overall study, the following PASM values may be<br />
followed as in impact criterion for declaring drought after the mandatory criteria <strong>of</strong> rainfall/SPI<br />
(Standardized Precipitation Index) deficiencies are triggered on.<br />
Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment<br />
710 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Soybean: 11- 14 PASM as severe, 33-40 PASM as moderate, > 60 PASM as no drought<br />
Statistical analysis linearly express that the correlation between PASM values and soybean<br />
seed yield as 0.51<br />
Relationship between PASM (%) and Soybean seed yield (Kg/ha) during 2008-2018 at<br />
different growth stages<br />
Treatments Drought class PASM % Yield Correlation<br />
Vegetative<br />
Flowering<br />
Pod Development<br />
Severe 12 597<br />
Moderate 40 1216<br />
Mild 66 1925<br />
No 94 1405<br />
Severe 14 1040<br />
Moderate 33 1020<br />
Mild 60 1719<br />
No 89 1435<br />
Severe 11 702<br />
Moderate 33 1288<br />
Mild 64 1896<br />
No 84 1399<br />
0.72<br />
711 | Page Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Conclusion<br />
Relationship between PASM and Seed yield (kg/ha)<br />
<br />
<br />
Increase in realization percent <strong>of</strong> yield as per increase in the PASM per cent clearly<br />
shows the effect <strong>of</strong> PASM per cent on yield. Present study highlights the necessity to<br />
understand PASM as One <strong>of</strong> the Impact Criteria for Drought Declaration for soybean<br />
crop for the region before planning and management.<br />
From the overall study, the PASM values may be followed as in impact criterion for<br />
declaring drought after the mandatory criteria <strong>of</strong> rainfall/SPI (Standardized<br />
Precipitation Index) deficiencies are triggered on.<br />
References:<br />
Anonymous, 2002, Drought 2002. Department <strong>of</strong> Agriculture and Cooperation, Ministry <strong>of</strong><br />
Agriculture, New Delhi.<br />
Anonymous,2016. Manual for Drought Management, published by Department <strong>of</strong> Agriculture,<br />
Cooperation and Farmers Welfare, Ministry <strong>of</strong> Agriculture and Farmers welfare, GoI,<br />
New Delhi.<br />
NRAA, 2013. Contingency and Compensatory Agriculture Plans for Droughts and Floods in<br />
India-2012, Position paper No.6, 877.<br />
Proceedings <strong>of</strong> 4 th International Conference on Dry Zone Agriculture 2018. Faculty <strong>of</strong><br />
Agriculture, University <strong>of</strong> Jaffna, Sri Lanka, 1 st & 2 nd <strong>of</strong> November 2018. Page No. 81.<br />
Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment<br />
712 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
T5-06R-1419<br />
Development and Evaluation <strong>of</strong> DC Motor Powered Brush Cutter<br />
Ashish S. Dhimate, I. Srinivas, B. S. Reddy, R. V. Adake, G. Pratibha,<br />
Mallikarjuna Reddy and S. Vijaya Kumar<br />
ICAR-Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, Hyderabad, Telangana-500059, India<br />
Nowadays, engine operated brush cutters are well popular among the farmer for various<br />
operation like grass cutting, paddy harvesting etc. The brush cutter is mostly run with fossil<br />
fuel like petrol. However, depletion <strong>of</strong> fossil fuel and day by day increase in their price, and<br />
pollution are the main challenges in use <strong>of</strong> fossil fuel. To overcome the expensive using cost<br />
and the carbon dioxide released problems, there have been concerned by many countries in the<br />
recent years (Chieh-Tsung Chi, 2012). Moreover, Government <strong>of</strong> India (GOI) promoting the<br />
use <strong>of</strong> renewable resources (Anonymous 2018) to meet the ever-rising energy demand in India.<br />
Therefore, the use <strong>of</strong> power storage technology (battery) for harnessing energy is gaining<br />
popularity for use in agricultural machinery (Sahoo and Rehman 2020). The recent scenario<br />
has increases the scope <strong>of</strong> battery technology for carrying out some <strong>of</strong> agricultural activity like<br />
weeding, harvesting etc. Further, it was observed that most <strong>of</strong> battery-operated machinery has<br />
less noise and vibration compared to engine-based machinery. Sahoo and Raheman 2020,<br />
developed vertical conveyor reaper. From the study, it was observed that developed e-reaper<br />
does not produce any exhaust emission, moreover the noise and vibration were 4.34% and<br />
49.89%, lesser, respectively. The cost <strong>of</strong> operation with the developed e-reaper was 63% lesser<br />
than the traditional method <strong>of</strong> harvesting. It also reviewed that estimation <strong>of</strong> charging cost <strong>of</strong><br />
battery per using time is generally lower than that needed by the internal combustion engine<br />
type. Hence, it was decided to develop a DC motor powered brush cutter for Indian farmers<br />
with small size land holdings to reduce the cost <strong>of</strong> cultivation.<br />
Methodology<br />
Description <strong>of</strong> developed Electric brush cutter<br />
Newly developed brush cutter consist battery unit, permanent magnet DC motor, motor speed<br />
controller, Coupler, Hallow Pipe and spline shaft, gear head, cutting blade, crop gathering unit,<br />
etc. Total weight <strong>of</strong> prototype is 11.5 kg including battery. Operation <strong>of</strong> developed prototype<br />
is similar to engine operated brush cutter. The battery is fixed in shoulder mounted sack and its<br />
whole weight carried by both shoulders equally.<br />
Performance evaluation <strong>of</strong> e‐brush cutter<br />
The performance <strong>of</strong> the developed DC motor powered brush cutter was evaluated in laboratory<br />
and field at ICAR-Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, Hyderabad. It was tested<br />
on finger millet crop stem after harvesting ear-head. The remaining stem <strong>of</strong> the finger millet is<br />
713 | Page Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
precious fodder for livestock. Therefore, harvesting trail conducted on these standing stems to<br />
cut it and used as fodder.<br />
Experimental design<br />
The developed prototype tested on finger millet crop. The performance parameters like<br />
Electric Energy requirement, Watthour, Electric Power Requirement, Watt, field capacity,<br />
cutting efficiency, battery run time, height <strong>of</strong> cut during the operation were measured.<br />
Detail specifications <strong>of</strong> DC powered brush cutter<br />
SI. No. Particulars Specification<br />
1. Weight 11.5 kg<br />
2. Battery capacity 18 Ah<br />
3.<br />
Motor Type and<br />
Power<br />
DC motor<br />
120/150/250 watt<br />
4. Motor speed 4000 rpm<br />
5. Motor speed controller Available<br />
Field crop parameter<br />
The performance evaluation <strong>of</strong> machine conducted on Finger millet stem.<br />
Sr. No. Crop Parameters Finger millet stem<br />
1 Height <strong>of</strong> crop, cm 80<br />
2 Crop density, hill/m 2 22<br />
3 No. <strong>of</strong> hills per m 2 22<br />
4 Plant per hill 7-8<br />
5 Row to row spacing, cm 45<br />
6 Hill to hill spacing, cm 10-18<br />
7 Stem diameter, cm 0.8-1.2<br />
8 Hill diameter, cm 10<br />
9 Biomass per m 2 , kg 2.5<br />
Results<br />
The developed brush cutter cuts the crop from bottom and windrow it in left side <strong>of</strong> operator.<br />
The operator can operate it by fixing machine on one shoulder with shoulder strap and swinging<br />
it from right to left. The performance evaluation <strong>of</strong> developed prototype conducted on finger<br />
millet crop stem. The field capacity was observed 250m 2 per hour with 15 min rest time.<br />
Further, it was found that the developed brush cutter could work effectively for 1.5-2 h<br />
continuously in one charging. The cutting efficiency <strong>of</strong> 95% was found with developed brush<br />
cutter. The cutting width <strong>of</strong> brush cutter for finger millet was 80-100 cm was found suitable to<br />
avoid clogging. It was also observed that developed prototype produces lesser noise and<br />
minimum vibration as compared to engine operated brush cutter. The maximum power<br />
Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment<br />
714 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
requirement by brush cutter at the time <strong>of</strong> cutting stroke was found to be 110 watt and it may<br />
vary according to crop type and plant density.<br />
References<br />
Anonymous (2018) National Energy Policy (NEP) Draft, NITI Aayog, GOI, 2017:<br />
http://niti.gov.in/write readd ata/files /new_initi ative s/ NEP-ID_27.06.2017.pdf.<br />
Chieh-Tsung Chi (2012) A new electric brush cutter. WSEAS Trans Syst Control 3(7):2224–<br />
2856.<br />
Sahoo A U and Raheman Hifjur (2020) Development <strong>of</strong> an electric reaper: a clean harvesting<br />
machine for cereal crops. Clean Technol. Environ. Policy, 22: 955–964.<br />
T5-07R-1486<br />
Modified Vegetative Drought Response Index (VegDRI) for Drought Risk<br />
Assessment <strong>of</strong> Andhra Pradesh<br />
G. S. Pratyusha Kranthi 1 , K. V. Rao 1 and K. Padmakumari 2<br />
1 ICAR-Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, Hyderabad<br />
2 Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University, Kakinada<br />
Drought risk is a product <strong>of</strong> a region’s exposure to the climate hazard and its vulnerability to<br />
extended periods <strong>of</strong> water shortage (Wilhite, 1985). Since there is a strong relationship between<br />
poverty and drought proneness <strong>of</strong> a region, there is a need to understand and address the risk<br />
associated with drought. Risk assessment reduces the impacts <strong>of</strong> drought through mitigation<br />
and preparedness and help in decision-making process for policy makers. Drought hazard and<br />
risk assessments are <strong>of</strong>ten established for the current climate situation; these assessments make<br />
use <strong>of</strong> historical datasets <strong>of</strong> drought hazards, drought impacts, and information about exposure<br />
and vulnerability to drought. Agricultural drought risk assessment is done by analysing rainfall<br />
and evapotranspiration data. However, this approach lacks spatial and temporal variability.<br />
Spatial and temporal analysis through remote sensing (RS) and geographic information system<br />
(GIS) has greatly felicitated drought risk assessment by identifying drought risk zones and<br />
prioritizing based on risk level. Detection, monitoring <strong>of</strong> drought requires accurate and<br />
continuous information, which may not be effectively collected through conventional methods.<br />
RS and GIS make it possible to obtain continuous information over larger areas. A study on<br />
drought risk assessment in rainfed areas <strong>of</strong> Andhra Pradesh using spatial and temporal analysis<br />
was framed using modified Vegetative Drought Response Index (VegDRI) for crops <strong>of</strong><br />
different crop durations and for different soil types at varying depths.<br />
715 | Page Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Methodology<br />
VegDRI model was produced by the National Drought Mitigation Centre (NDMC) in<br />
collaboration with USGS and Centre for Earth Resources Observation and Science (EROS)<br />
and the High Plains Regional Climate Center (HPRCC). According to methodology proposed<br />
by Wardlow et al., the VegDRI Model consists <strong>of</strong> three primary steps. The first step was to<br />
process, summarize, and organize the data for the eight variables used in VegDRI model into<br />
a database. A 16-year (2000 – 2015) historical record <strong>of</strong> climate-based drought index and<br />
satellite-derived vegetation indices (VI) observations and information from four temporally<br />
static biophysical variables were included in the training database. For present study area, each<br />
variable information was summarized for 70 weather stations and sequentially ordered in the<br />
database for model development. The second step was to generate an empirically derived<br />
model by applying a supervised classification and regression-tree (CART) analysis technique<br />
to information in the database. The third step was to apply the models to the geospatial data to<br />
produce a 500 m resolution VegDRI map for the study area. The VegDRI map contains seven<br />
categories <strong>of</strong> varying levels <strong>of</strong> drought-induced vegetation stress, based on the PDSI drought<br />
classification (Palmer, 1965). In modified VegDRI model, instead <strong>of</strong> using biweekly AVHRR<br />
NDVI as mentioned in the original methodology MODIS NDVI data generated from daily<br />
surface reflectance data (MOD09A1) was used under satellite variables. Similar approach was<br />
used by Yonatan (2013) and Won-Ho Nam (2017). One <strong>of</strong> the biophysical variable landuse<br />
landcover (LULC) was confined to kharif crops and irrigated areas were also masked.<br />
Results<br />
VegDRI, the depiction <strong>of</strong> vegetation stress across the study area indicated that the growth <strong>of</strong><br />
long duration crops like redgram during kharif was near-to-normal during the study period<br />
except the years 2001, 2004 and 2015. During the years 2001 and 2015, the crop exhibited<br />
near-to-normal conditions in 60 and 65 percent locations, respectively. However, pre-drought<br />
stress also occurred in 35 percent locations during these years and mediocre drought was<br />
observed in 5 percent locations during 2001. Whereas the year 2004, was predominantly predrought<br />
stress in 65 percent locations and near-to-normal in 35 percent locations. Thus,<br />
VegDRI index indicated mostly near-to-normal condition <strong>of</strong> redgram in the study area during<br />
the study period. VegDRI index for short duration crops like greengram was near-to-normal<br />
during the study period in more than 50 percent <strong>of</strong> the locations except during 2008, 2010 and<br />
2013. During these years (2008, 2010, 2013), unusually moist situation existed in more than<br />
50 percent locations. The year 2015 exhibited near-to-normal and unusually moist situations in<br />
equivalent areas.<br />
Irrespective <strong>of</strong> soil type or depth the VegDRI index was near-to-normal in case <strong>of</strong> redgram and<br />
near-to-normal to unusually moist in case <strong>of</strong> greengram in the entire study area during the study<br />
period. In redgram, pre-drought condition was observed only during 2001 and 2004 in deep<br />
Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment<br />
716 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
clay soil, 2001 in shallow clay soil and during 2004 and 2015 in shallow loam soils. In deep<br />
loam soils the crop performance was near-to-normal during the entire study period. Whereas<br />
in greengram unusually moist situations existed irrespective <strong>of</strong> the soil type and depth during<br />
2010 and 2013. However, the same situation was noted during 2008 and 2015 in both deep and<br />
shallow loam soils and during 2000, 2003, 2005 and in deep loam soils during 2007 alone.<br />
The relation established between rainfall and VegDRI also reported that the linear function<br />
represented data more than 50 percent during the entire study period. The predictive efficiency<br />
<strong>of</strong> the linear term (b) and the determination coefficient (R 2 ) was high in redgram and moderate<br />
to high in greengram. The total explained variation in the estimation <strong>of</strong> the crop performance<br />
by VegDRI index in relation to rainfall was 0.58 to 0.96. The explained variation <strong>of</strong> more than<br />
0.75 for the entire study period makes VegDRI index dependable in the estimation <strong>of</strong> redgram<br />
performance in response to soil moisture availability and is more than 0.5 for greengram.<br />
Conclusions<br />
From the above results it can be inferred that, input from the spectral signatures <strong>of</strong> the crop<br />
canopy besides ground-based information had made VegDRI more agreeable for different soil<br />
types, soil depths and crop types. A similar result was mentioned by Won-Ho Nam et al., where<br />
PDSI delayed or lagged in the drought assessment since the data depend on soil moisture,<br />
whereas VegDRI-SKorea was useful for more timely detection <strong>of</strong> improvement in drought<br />
conditions compared to the station-based self-calibrated PDSI. Crops like greengram being<br />
sturdier and with quick canopy coverage might have been analysed easily by VegDRI for crop<br />
condition based on moisture availability. According to Brown et al., (2008) any subtle change<br />
in vegetation conditions when there is low green biomass can result in greater fluctuations in<br />
NDVI values as compared to later in the growing season when slight changes in vegetation<br />
with higher biomass result in less change in the NDVI values.<br />
References<br />
Brown, J. F., Wardlow, B.D., Tadesse, T., Hayes, M. J., and Reed, B. C. 2007. The vegetation<br />
drought response index (VegDRI): A new integrated approach for monitoring drought<br />
stress in vegetation, In Press. GI Sci. Rem. Sens.<br />
Palmer, W. C. 1965. Meteorological drought. Office <strong>of</strong> Climatology Research Paper 45,<br />
Weather Bureau, Washington DC, 58 pp.<br />
Wilhite, D. A. and Glantz, M. H. 1985. Understanding the drought phenomenon: The role <strong>of</strong><br />
definitions. Water Int., 10:111–120<br />
Won-Ho Nam, Tsegaye Tadesse, Brian D, Wardlow, Michael Hayes J, Mark D. Svoboda, Eun-<br />
Mi Hong, Yakov A. Pachepsky and Min-Won Jang. 2018. Developing the vegetation drought<br />
717 | Page Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
response index for South Korea (VegDRI-SKorea) to assess the vegetation condition<br />
during drought events. Int. J. Rem. Sens. 39:1548–1574.<br />
Yonatan Getachew 2013. Analysing the Effect <strong>of</strong> High-Resolution Satellite Images for<br />
Drought Prediction. Addis Ababa University School <strong>of</strong> Graduate Studies College <strong>of</strong><br />
Natural Sciences. Department <strong>of</strong> Computer Science.<br />
T5-08R-1534<br />
Performance Evaluation <strong>of</strong> Mini Tractor Operated Rotary Weeder with L-<br />
Type Blades in Redgram Crop<br />
V. R. Mallikarjuna 1 , B. Sanjeeva Reddy 1 and A. K. Dave 2<br />
1<br />
ICAR - Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, Hyderabad.<br />
2 FMPE, IGKV, Raipur (C.G.)<br />
India is the largest producer and consumer <strong>of</strong> redgram in the world. Redgram also known as<br />
Pigeon pea (Arhar or tur in local language) is an important legume and pulse crop <strong>of</strong> India and<br />
is being cultivated on 35.50 lakh ha area with a production <strong>of</strong> 4.43 Million tones in 2021-2022<br />
(ANGRAU Outlook report, 2021). Among total pulses production, redgram accounts for<br />
14.5% in area and 15.5% in productivity. Maharashtra is the largest producer with<br />
approximately 12.47 lakh ha area with average productivity <strong>of</strong> 11.31 Q/ha. Redgram as a pulse<br />
crop is an important source <strong>of</strong> protein for human and animal diet and has its own contribution<br />
as a builder and restorer <strong>of</strong> soil fertility. Redgram contains about 22 percent protein, which is<br />
almost three times that <strong>of</strong> cereals. Redgram supplies a major share <strong>of</strong> protein requirement <strong>of</strong><br />
vegetarian population <strong>of</strong> the country. It is particularly rich in lysine, rib<strong>of</strong>lavin, thiamine, niacin<br />
and iron. In Ethiopia, not only the pods, but also the young shoots and leaves are cooked and<br />
eaten. According to the latest Agriculture Census, the total number <strong>of</strong> operational holdings in<br />
India numbered 138.35 million with an average land size <strong>of</strong> 1.15 hectares <strong>of</strong> the total holdings,<br />
85 per cent are in marginal and small farm categories <strong>of</strong> less than 2 hectares. These small farms,<br />
though operating only on 44 per cent <strong>of</strong> land under cultivation, are the main providers <strong>of</strong> food<br />
and nutritional security to the nation but have limited access to resources as well as<br />
technologies. To ensure livelihood security <strong>of</strong> marginal and small farmers, it is necessary to<br />
focus on their technological needs at lower costs.<br />
Methodology<br />
Crop species is considered as an important parameter. Pigeon pea crop is very well fitting in to<br />
various agro-ecological sub-regions for inter cropping with cereals as well as sole crop. This<br />
crop grains serve for protein supplement for vegetarian human population diet and fodder for<br />
the animals. PRG158 variety red gram, which is widely grown. Another important parameter<br />
that influences the weeding operation is row to row spacing <strong>of</strong> the crop which requires some<br />
Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment<br />
718 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
contemporary adjustments in the over all implement length, effective working width, type <strong>of</strong><br />
cutting element, accordingly blade spacing and number <strong>of</strong> blades to be fitted on the rotor shaft.<br />
Weeding machine performance is influenced by the crop height. In general, weed removal<br />
process alone or in combination with intercultural operation being taken up at different time<br />
intervals; but two such operations are compulsorily carried by farmers. In normal conditions<br />
30 to 60 days after sowing (DAS) is recommended practice in pigeon pea. Branching pattern<br />
in pigeon pea depends on genotype and spacing between rows and plant to plant. At wider<br />
spacing's, it may form a bush and at narrow spacing remains compact and upright with lower<br />
quantity <strong>of</strong> foliage. As the crop DAS is more, the branches will spread side words occupying<br />
more inter row spacing. Horizontal spread <strong>of</strong> branches makes it difficult to move any<br />
implement and slow down the operational speed <strong>of</strong> the machine. The horizontal spreading <strong>of</strong><br />
the canopy <strong>of</strong> the red gram crop was measured at the maximum cone diameter. Overall, the<br />
type <strong>of</strong> crop species and its planting geometry influences the performance and as well as field<br />
capacity <strong>of</strong> weeding machine. The machinery system was conceptualized and fabricated based<br />
on mean values <strong>of</strong> various crop parameters measured to test for mechanical weeding operation.<br />
Selection <strong>of</strong> power source is also a very important while developing any type <strong>of</strong> agricultural<br />
machine. The power required for rotary weeder was selected from a mini tractor having engine<br />
power <strong>of</strong> 13.4 kW (18.5 hp).<br />
Results<br />
Weeding Operation in redgram field with L-Type Blades<br />
Rotary weeder prototype was evaluated in terms <strong>of</strong> weeding efficiency, plant damage, effective<br />
field capacity and fuel consumption. Weeding efficiency <strong>of</strong> L-type blades with rotary speeds<br />
<strong>of</strong> 300 and 440 rpm with forward speed 1.7 km/h was varied in the range <strong>of</strong> 82.56% to 91.69%.<br />
Weeding efficiency <strong>of</strong> L-type blades with rotary speeds <strong>of</strong> 300 and 440 rpm with forward speed<br />
<strong>of</strong> 2.5 km/h in the range <strong>of</strong> 76.87% to 80.24%. Plant damage <strong>of</strong> L-type blades with rotary speed<br />
719 | Page Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
<strong>of</strong> 300 and 440 rpm with forward speed 1.7 km/h at 25 and 45 days after sowing was in the<br />
range <strong>of</strong> 2.12% to 3.96%. For L-type blades the plant damage varied from 2.19% to 4.16% at<br />
the selected variables. The effective field capacity <strong>of</strong> L-type blades with rotary speeds <strong>of</strong> 300<br />
and 440 rpm at forward speed 1.7 km/h at 25 and 45 DAS was varied in the range <strong>of</strong> 0.13 ha/h<br />
to 0.14 ha/h. Effective field capacity for L-type blades with rotary speeds <strong>of</strong> 300 and 440 rpm<br />
with forward speed 2.5 km/h at 25 and 45 DAS was varied in the range <strong>of</strong> 0.19 ha/h and 0.21<br />
ha/h. The fuel consumption <strong>of</strong> modified mini tractor having L-type blades with rotary speeds<br />
<strong>of</strong> 300 and 440 rpm with forward speed 1.7 km/h at 25 and 45 DAS was varied in the range <strong>of</strong><br />
0.95 - 1.12 l/h. Fuel consumption for L-type blades with rotary speeds <strong>of</strong> 300 and 440 rpm with<br />
forward speed 2.5 km/h at 25 and 45 DAS varied from 1.25-1.38 l/h, respectively. Ten number<br />
<strong>of</strong> observations for each parameter were measured in the earmarked field plot and the range<br />
was recorded. Weeding implements work in shallower depth up to 10cm (Goel et. al., 2008)<br />
when compared with tillage implement, the soil moisture and bulk density values were<br />
measured in the depth range 0 - 10cm and cone penetration resistance values from 0-17.5cm.<br />
The soil moisture and bulk density in the selected plots ranged from 9.6 to 12.49%db and 1.25<br />
to 1.4 g/cc, respectively. The cone penetration resistance values varied from 100-2489 MPa<br />
and as the depth increased from surface, penetration resistance was also increased.<br />
Conclusion<br />
In redgram crop production weed is one <strong>of</strong> the major problems. But, the simplest and most<br />
popular management method is manual weed control, where, labours pull weeds out <strong>of</strong> the soil<br />
using different types <strong>of</strong> hand tools like khurpi, wheel hoe, hand hoe, etc. simultaneously<br />
fulfilling intercultural operation also. These practices are expensive, time consuming and<br />
difficult to organize labourer for weeding. Mechanical weed control is very effective as it helps<br />
to reduce the drudgery involved in manual weeding, kills the weeds and keeps the soil surface<br />
loose ensuring soil aeration and moisture absorption capacity.<br />
References<br />
Power J. R., Harris J. R, Etherton, K. A. Snyder M. Ronaghi and Newburgh, B. H. 2000.<br />
Performance <strong>of</strong> an automatically deployable ROPS on ASAE tests. J. Agric. Saf.<br />
Health, 7:51-61.<br />
Rajashekar M and Dr. Mohan Kumar S., 2015. Virtual Design, aanalysis and ddevelopment <strong>of</strong><br />
single row weeder. Int. J. Emerg. Tech., 6(1): 125-129.<br />
Tajuddin A. 2006. Design, development and testing <strong>of</strong> engine operated weeder. Agric. Eng.<br />
Today, 30(5, 6): 25–29.<br />
Tewari V.K, Datta R.K. and Murthy A.S.R. 1993. Field performance <strong>of</strong> weeding blades <strong>of</strong> a<br />
manually operated push-pull weeder. J. Agric. Eng. Resh., 55: 129-141.<br />
Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment<br />
720 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Thorat Deepak S, Sahoo P. K, Dipankar De and Mir Asif Iquebal. 2014. Design and<br />
Development <strong>of</strong> Ridge Pr<strong>of</strong>ile Power Weeder. J. Agric. Eng., 51 (4)<br />
Veerangouda M, Anantachar M and Sushilendra. 2010. Performance evaluation <strong>of</strong> weeders in<br />
cotton. Karnataka J. Agric. Sci., 23(5): 732-736.<br />
T5-09R-1101<br />
Sorghum Yield Response to Future Climate in a Semi-Arid Environment<br />
M. A. Sarath Chandran* and A. V. M. Subba Rao<br />
ICAR-Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, Hyderabad – 500059, Telangana, India<br />
*ma.sarath@icar.gov.in<br />
Sorghum is a key dryland cereal crop that is highly adaptable to various extreme weather<br />
events, especially drought. The industrial demand for sorghum has been on the rise, considering<br />
the requirement in the food industry. Hence, the response <strong>of</strong> sorghum to projected climate is a<br />
topic <strong>of</strong> interest in semi-arid regions <strong>of</strong> the world. Climate, with its spatial and temporal<br />
variability, is a major influencing factor in crop production. Thus, any change in climatic<br />
elements is bound to have either positive or negative impacts on crop production. While the<br />
increase in temperature during crop growing season reduces the yield, the CO 2 fertilization<br />
effect to an extent can reduce its negative impact. Very little literature is available in the Indian<br />
context regarding the response <strong>of</strong> various sorghum cultivars to projected climate using crop<br />
modelling. This present study was undertaken with the objectives to calibrate the CERES-<br />
Sorghum-DSSAT model for the semi-arid region <strong>of</strong> India, validating the CERES-Sorghum-<br />
DSSAT model for sorghum and quantifying the impact <strong>of</strong> projected climate on growth and<br />
yield <strong>of</strong> sorghum in the semi-arid region <strong>of</strong> India.<br />
Methodology<br />
A field experiment was conducted in Gunegal Research Farm <strong>of</strong> ICAR-CRIDA during the<br />
Kharif seasons <strong>of</strong> 2016-2018 in a split-plot design with three dates <strong>of</strong> sowing as the main plot<br />
treatment and three sorghum cultivars (CSV-20, CSV-23 and CSV-27) as sub-plot treatments.<br />
The data during the first two years was used for calibration <strong>of</strong> the CERES-Sorghum model in<br />
DSSAT v4.7.0 and the third-year data was used for model validation. The future climate was<br />
derived from an ensemble <strong>of</strong> 29 general circulation models (GCMs). The simulation was<br />
conducted for three time periods viz., near-century (2010-39), mid-century (2040-69) and endcentury<br />
(2070-99) under emission pathways <strong>of</strong> RCP4.5 and RCP8.5. The mean changes in days<br />
to anthesis, total crop duration, and yield during the future time periods compared to that <strong>of</strong><br />
baseline (1980-2009) were estimated.<br />
721 | Page Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Results<br />
Changes in projected climate compared to baseline: The mean seasonal rainfall during the baseline<br />
period was 527 mm. The mean seasonal rainfall is projected to change by -8.7%, -7.6%, -8.3%, +1.7%,<br />
+0.8% and +1.1% during near-century-RCP4.5, near-century-RCP8.5, mid-century-RCP4.5, midcentury-RCP8.5,<br />
end-century-RCP4.5, end-century-RCP8.5, respectively. The mean baseline<br />
maximum temperature (Tmax) during the sorghum growing period was 32 °C. No change in Tmax is<br />
projected during the near century under both RCP4.5 and 8.5. It is projected to increase by 1 °C during<br />
mid-century (RCP4.5 and 8.5) and end-century-RCP4.5; 2 °C by end-century-RCP8.5. Similarly, Tmin<br />
is projected to increase by 1 °C during the near-century (both under RCP4.5 and 8.5), mid-century and<br />
end-century under RCP4.5. During the end-century-RCP8.5, the projected rise in Tmin is +3 °C.<br />
Projected changes in phenology: A delayed anthesis and maturity by 1-2 days is projected for all three<br />
sorghum cultivars (CSV-20, 23 and 27) during near-century-RCP4.5 and 8.5 as depicted in the figures<br />
below. During all other future scenarios, days to anthesis and total crop duration are projected to<br />
decrease. The highest decrease is projected during end-century-RCP8.5 (6-7 days for days to anthesis<br />
and 7-10 days for total crop duration). The major reason for this may be the projected increase in both<br />
Tmax and Tmin, which will cause a faster accumulation <strong>of</strong> growing degree days (Guo et al., 2019;<br />
Chandran et al., 2022).<br />
Projected changes in grain yield: The yield is projected to decrease during all future scenarios. For<br />
CSV-20, the projected yield reduction is -5%, -6%, -13%, -22%, -11% and -31% during near-century-<br />
RCP4.5, near-century-RCP8.5, mid-century-RCP4.5, mid-century-RCP8.5, end-century-RCP4.5, endcentury-RCP8.5,<br />
respectively (Fig. 1b). For CSV-23, the projected reduction is -1%, -2%, -8%, -8%, -<br />
4% and -15%, respectively during the above-mentioned future climates. For CSV-27, the yield is<br />
projected to decrease by -4%, -4%, -10%, -12%, -5% and -18%. It was observed that among the three<br />
cultivars, the yield <strong>of</strong> CSV-20 will be reduced to a greater extent than the other two. Among the two<br />
emission scenarios, a greater yield reduction was simulated under RCP8.5, compared to RCP4.5 during<br />
all the future climates<br />
Projected changes in (a) phenology and (b) yield <strong>of</strong> three sorghum cultivars during future climates under<br />
a semi-arid environment<br />
Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment<br />
722 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Conclusion<br />
CERES-Sorghum model <strong>of</strong> DSSAT was calibrated and validated for a semi-arid location in<br />
India for climate change impact assessment in sorghum. Rising temperatures (both Tmax and<br />
Tmin) caused a shortening <strong>of</strong> crop duration (in future climates). Shortening <strong>of</strong> crop duration<br />
led to a reduction in yield as it affected both vegetative growth and reproductive phases. This<br />
may be the reason for the decrease in yield consistently during future climates, except during<br />
the near century, where a marked increase in both Tmax and Tmin was not projected. The<br />
results <strong>of</strong> the study highlight the necessity to develop adaptation strategies for overcoming the<br />
negative impact <strong>of</strong> projected climate on sorghum cultivation.<br />
References<br />
Guo Y, Wu W, Du, M., Liu, X., Wang, J., Bryant, C.R. 2019 Modelling climate change impacts<br />
on rice growth and yield under global warming <strong>of</strong> 1.5 and 2.0 °C in the Pearl River<br />
Delta, China. Atmosphere. 10:567.<br />
Chandran M. A. S, Banerjee S, Mukherjee A, Nanda M.K. and Kumari V.V. 2022. Evaluating<br />
the long-term impact <strong>of</strong> projected climate on rice-lentil-groundnut cropping system in<br />
lower gangetic plain <strong>of</strong> India using crop simulation modelling. Int J Biomet. 66: 55-69.<br />
T5-10P-1003<br />
Stress Management in Wheat Crop through Foliar Spray <strong>of</strong> TGA Agrochemical<br />
R. S. Rathore 1 , Dayanand 1 , P. P. Rohilla 2* , S. K.Singh 2 and V. Nagar 2<br />
1 Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Abusar-Jhunjhunu (Raj.),<br />
2 Swami Keshwanand Rajasthan Agricultural University, Bikaner (Raj.)-333001 (India).<br />
*drpprohilla@gmail.com<br />
Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) is the second most important cereal crop after rice in providing food<br />
and nutritional security to the masses in India. It is the most widely cultivated cereal crop which is<br />
the largest contributor with nearly 30% <strong>of</strong> the world grain production and 50% <strong>of</strong> the world grain<br />
trade. FAO estimated that the world would require additional 198 million tonnes <strong>of</strong> wheat by 2050<br />
to accomplish the future demands, for which wheat production need to be increased by 77% in the<br />
developing countries. Regarding the global climate change in the past few decades, the impact <strong>of</strong><br />
rising temperature on wheat production is gaining concern worldwide. Heat and drought are the<br />
major abiotic stress limiting the wheat production, which are common in semi-arid and arid region.<br />
Keeping the above problem in view total 80 demonstrations on wheat crop were conducted at<br />
farmer’s field in NICRA village Bharu, Jhunjhunu (Rajasthan) during rabi season 2017-18 to 2020-<br />
21 for four consecutive years to assess the effect <strong>of</strong> TGA (Thio Glycolic Acid) agrochemical foliar<br />
spray on stress management in wheat crop. TGA is the organic compound, <strong>of</strong>ten called Mercapto<br />
723 | Page Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
acetic acid (MAA). It contains both thio and carboxylic acid functional groups. It is used in salt forms<br />
including calcium thioglycolate and sodium thioglycolate. Farming situation is irrigated and soil is<br />
sandy loam in Jhunjhunu district. The sowing <strong>of</strong> wheat crop was done from second week to last week<br />
<strong>of</strong> November under irrigated condition. Two foliar spray <strong>of</strong> TGA agrochemical (100 ppm) on 15<br />
days interval for two times at first and second fortnight in February month was done by knapsack<br />
/power sprayer. Crop was harvested during first/ second week <strong>of</strong> April. The data analyzed revealed<br />
that the average gross return and net return was `107636 and `96495; `59111 and `49043 <strong>of</strong> foliar<br />
spray demonstration and local check, respectively. It could be concluded that average production<br />
(12.11 %) and net pr<strong>of</strong>it <strong>of</strong> wheat crop (20.52%) were increased by foliar spray <strong>of</strong> TGA under field<br />
conditions. The total cost <strong>of</strong> TGA agro-chemical material along with two foliar spray cost was about<br />
`500/ha. Hence, two foliar spray <strong>of</strong> TGA agro-chemical at tillering and milking stage in wheat crop<br />
could be added in package <strong>of</strong> practices and motivate the farmers for adoption <strong>of</strong> new techniques for<br />
stress management in wheat crop and getting economic returns.<br />
T5-11P-1024<br />
Effect <strong>of</strong> Foliar Application <strong>of</strong> Different Nan<strong>of</strong>ertilizers on Performance <strong>of</strong><br />
Rainfed Maize in Southern Telangana<br />
K. A. Gopinath 1 , V. Visha Kumari 1 , K. Sammi Reddy 1 , V. K. Singh 1 ,<br />
G. Ravindra Chary 1 , A. K. Shanker 1 , S. Kundu 1 , M.R. Krupashankar 2 ,<br />
Tarunendu Singh 2 and B. Rajkumar 1<br />
1 ICAR-Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, Hyderabad, Telangana 500 059, India;<br />
2 Indian Farmers Fertilizer Cooperative Limited, IFFCO Sadan, New Delhi 110 017, India<br />
Limited nutrient use efficiency and environmental constraints associated with the use <strong>of</strong><br />
chemical fertilizers remain a hindrance for achieving reasonable sustainability in agriculture.<br />
Additionally, cost increases resulting from over-application <strong>of</strong> chemical fertilizers reduce<br />
pr<strong>of</strong>it margins for growers. Several strategies have been proposed to increase fertilizer use<br />
efficiency, such as the use <strong>of</strong> precision fertilization, split or localized application, fertigation,<br />
and the use <strong>of</strong> nan<strong>of</strong>ertilizers. Studies have revealed that some nan<strong>of</strong>ertilizers have the potential<br />
to increase crop productivity by enhancing seed germination, seedling growth, photosynthesis,<br />
nitrogen metabolism, and protein and carbohydrate synthesis, aside from improving stress<br />
tolerance. However, there is scarcity <strong>of</strong> information especially on effect <strong>of</strong> nan<strong>of</strong>ertilizers on<br />
growth and yield <strong>of</strong> rainfed crops, nutrient use efficiency and on soil properties.<br />
Methodology<br />
A field experiment was conducted during kharif, 2021 at Gunegal Research Farm (GRF) <strong>of</strong><br />
ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad to study the effect <strong>of</strong> nano-N, nano-Zn and Nano-Cu alone and in<br />
combinations with different doses <strong>of</strong> recommended NPK on rainfed maize (cv. DHM 111).<br />
Soil <strong>of</strong> the experimental site was sandy loam; slightly acidic in reaction (pH 6.51), EC was in<br />
Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment<br />
724 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
normal range (0.05-0.07 dS/m), low in organic carbon (0.43%), available N (229.1 kg/ha), high<br />
in available P (24.7 kg/ha) and medium in available K (218.1 kg/ha). The experiment was<br />
arranged in a randomized block design with three replications. The experimental plots were<br />
tilled to a depth <strong>of</strong> 15-20cm using tractor-drawn cultivator twice before sowing <strong>of</strong> the crop.<br />
Sowing was done with tractor-drawn seed drill at a spacing <strong>of</strong> 90 cm × 20 cm. Thinning and<br />
gap filling was done 10-15 days after sowing, as required. The recommended dose <strong>of</strong> NPKZn<br />
was 90:45:45:25 kg N, P2O5, K2O and ZnSO4/ha. Nan<strong>of</strong>ertilizers were sprayed @ 2ml/liter<br />
water at 25 and 45 days after sowing as per the treatment, using a battery-operated power<br />
sprayer.<br />
Results<br />
Application <strong>of</strong> recommended dose <strong>of</strong> fertilizers (NPKZn) with foliar spray <strong>of</strong> nano-N + nano-<br />
Zn twice at 25 and 45 days after sowing being on par with N100PK + nano-N + nano-Zn + nano-<br />
Cu, recommended NPK, N 100PKZn + nano-N, N 75PKZn + nano-N, N 100PK + nano-Zn, N 75PK<br />
+ nano-N + nano-Zn and N 100PK + nano-Cu recorded significantly higher SPAD value (42.7)<br />
compared to other treatments. Foliar application <strong>of</strong> nano-N, nano-Zn and nano-Cu with<br />
application <strong>of</strong> either 75% or 100% recommended N recorded similar but significantly higher<br />
leaf area index (LAI) compared to foliar spray <strong>of</strong> nan<strong>of</strong>ertilizers with control (no N) and 50%<br />
recommended N. Application <strong>of</strong> recommended NPK with foliar spray <strong>of</strong> nano-N + nano-Zn +<br />
nano-Cu or nano-N + nano-Zn recorded significantly higher 100-grain weight (28.4-28.6 g)<br />
compared to other treatments. Similarly, application <strong>of</strong> recommended NPK + foliar spray <strong>of</strong><br />
nano-urea + nano-Zn + nano-Cu being on par with recommended NPK + foliar spray <strong>of</strong> nanourea<br />
+ nano-Zn recorded significantly higher grain yield (3308 kg/ha) compared to other<br />
treatments. Kumar et al. (2022) also reported increase yield <strong>of</strong> wheat, sesame, pearl millet and<br />
mustard with application <strong>of</strong> nano-N and nano-Zn. Application <strong>of</strong> recommended NPK + foliar<br />
spray <strong>of</strong> nano-N + nano-Zn also recorded significantly higher stalk yield (6179 kg/ha)<br />
compared to other treatments except recommended dose <strong>of</strong> fertilizers alone, recommended<br />
NPK + nano-Zn, foliar spray <strong>of</strong> nano-N + nano-Zn with application <strong>of</strong> either 50% or 75%<br />
recommended N, recommended NPK + nano-Cu, and N100PK + nano-N + nano-Zn + nano-Cu<br />
treatments. Application <strong>of</strong> recommended NPK + foliar spray <strong>of</strong> nano-N, nano-Zn and nano-Cu<br />
twice at 25 and 45 days after sowing recorded significantly higher harvest index (0.36)<br />
compared to other treatments except N75PKZn + nano-N, N100PKZn + nano-N, N100PK + nano-<br />
Zn, N 75PK + nano-N + nano-Zn, and N 100PK + nano-N + nano-Zn + nano-Cu.<br />
725 | Page Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Effect <strong>of</strong> treatments on growth and yield <strong>of</strong> maize<br />
Treatment SPAD LAI<br />
100-seed<br />
weight (g)<br />
Grain yield<br />
(kg/ha)<br />
N 0PKZn 0 19.8 2.96 25.2 835<br />
NPKZn 0 40.2 5.08 26.3 2589<br />
N 0PKZn 21.7 3.33 25.3 909<br />
N 50PKZn 31.9 3.91 26.2 1693<br />
N 75PKZn 36.3 4.80 26.8 2241<br />
N 100PKZn 40.7 5.20 26.8 2694<br />
N 0PKZn + Nano-N 22.2 3.43 25.4 1227<br />
N 50PKZn + Nano-N 34.8 4.12 26.8 2218<br />
N 75PKZn + Nano-N 40.0 5.10 27.0 2801<br />
N 100PKZn + Nano-N 42.0 5.25 28.2 3009<br />
N 0PK + Nano-Zn 24.7 3.30 25.4 1036<br />
N 50PK + Nano-Zn 32.6 3.92 26.2 1758<br />
N 75PK + Nano-Zn 36.7 4.84 27.0 2385<br />
N 100PK + Nano-Zn 40.9 5.12 27.2 2896<br />
N 0PK + Nano-N + Nano-Zn 28.3 3.50 25.9 1359<br />
N 50PK + Nano-N + Nano-Zn 35.3 4.16 26.9 2350<br />
N 75PK + Nano-N + Nano-Zn 40.6 5.13 27.2 2920<br />
N 100PK + Nano-N + Nano-Zn 42.7 5.18 28.4 3299<br />
N 100PK + Nano-Cu 40.1 5.00 26.8 2603<br />
N 100PK + Nano-N + Nano-Zn + Nano-Cu 41.8 5.31 28.6 3308<br />
LSD (p=0.05) 3.6 0.52 0.7 253<br />
Conclusion<br />
Application <strong>of</strong> recommended NPK + foliar spray <strong>of</strong> nano-urea + nano-Zn + nano-Cu being on<br />
par with recommended NPK + foliar spray <strong>of</strong> nano-urea + nano-Zn recorded significantly<br />
higher grain yield (3308 kg/ha) compared to other treatments.<br />
References<br />
Kumar A, Singh K, Verma P, Singh O, Panwar A, Singh T, Kumar Y and Raliya R. 2022.<br />
Effect <strong>of</strong> nitrogen and zinc nan<strong>of</strong>ertilizer with the organic farming practices on cereal<br />
and oilseed crops. Sci. Rep., 12:6938.<br />
Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment<br />
726 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
T5-12P-1051<br />
Evaluation <strong>of</strong> Horse Gram Grain for Bio-Accessibility <strong>of</strong> Iron and Zinc by<br />
in-vitro Method<br />
K. Sreedevi Shankar 1* , Basudeb Sarkar 1 , Asma Siddiqua 1 , M. Shankar 2 and<br />
V. K. Singh 1<br />
1 ICAR-Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, Hyderabad-500059, Telangana, India;<br />
2 Pr<strong>of</strong>essor Jayashankar Telangana State Agricultural University, Hyderabad-500030, India.<br />
* k.sreedevishankar@icar.gov.in<br />
Horse gram (Macrotyloma uniflorum) is one <strong>of</strong> the lesser known legumes <strong>of</strong><br />
the tropics and subtropics, grown mostly under dryland conditions. Horse gram is an excellent<br />
source <strong>of</strong> iron and zinc, and is commonly consumed in India by farming community and lowincome<br />
groups. Four genotypes <strong>of</strong> horse gram were evaluated for their iron and zinc contents<br />
and their bio-accessibility measured through invitro dialyzability. The horse gram seeds have<br />
relatively higher trypsin inhibitor, hemagglutinin activities and natural phenols than most bean<br />
seeds. The most reliable method for determining bio-availability <strong>of</strong> iron from diets is to<br />
measure iron absorption. An invitro method, on the other hand has several advantages for rapid<br />
screening and testing <strong>of</strong> bio-availability <strong>of</strong> iron from diets consumed and suggest<br />
improvements in the diets so as to increase availability <strong>of</strong> iron from the legume.<br />
Methodology<br />
The grain samples from four genotypes <strong>of</strong> horse gram (16 K CRIDA – 18R, 16 K CRIDA –<br />
22, 16 K CRIDA – 19 and 16 K CRIDA – 4) were taken up for the study. Bio-accessibility <strong>of</strong><br />
iron and zinc from horse gram samples were determined by an invitro method described by<br />
Narasinga Rao and Prabhavathi (1978). The grain samples were extracted with pepsin-HCl at<br />
pH 1.35 and subsequently the pH was adjusted to pH 7.5 and iron and zinc were estimated by<br />
the AAS method. Calcium content and the metallic cations were determined through the diacid<br />
method using AAS. The phytic acid from horse gram samples were determined. The crude<br />
fiber was estimated by using ANKOM fibre bag system. The Physico-chemical and<br />
hydration/cooking characteristics <strong>of</strong> horse gram i.e., hydration capacity, hydration index,<br />
swelling capacity, swelling index, cooking time (min) and 100-seed weight were also<br />
estimated. All the samples were analysed in triplicate.<br />
Results<br />
The percent bio-accessibility <strong>of</strong> iron at pH 7.5 (7.23%) was found higher with 16 K CRIDA –<br />
18R. The bio-accessibility <strong>of</strong> zinc was significantly higher (32.21%) in genotype 16 K CRHG<br />
– 22. Significantly high content (213.00 mg/100 g) <strong>of</strong> phytic acid was observed in 16 K CRHG<br />
– 4. The calcium content was significantly higher (120.16 mg/100 g) in 16 K CRHG – 19. The<br />
727 | Page Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
crude fiber content <strong>of</strong> 4.8g was recorded with 16 K CRHG – 4. Regarding cooking studies, the<br />
higher (0.041 g water per seed) hydration capacity was recorded with 16 K CRHG – 19,<br />
hydration index (1.106 g) was recorded 16 K CRIDA – 18. Swelling capacity (0.078 ml per<br />
seed) was higher in 16 K CRHG – 19, swelling index (1.066 ml) noted with 16 K CRHG – 19.<br />
The cooking time was recorded significantly lower (6.02 min) in 16 K CRHG - 19.<br />
Conclusion<br />
The most reliable method for determining bioavailability <strong>of</strong> iron from diets is to measure iron<br />
absorption. The available iron as measured by this invitro procedure was shown to decrease<br />
considerably when inhibitors like phytic acid or tannin were included. Studies in humans have<br />
shown that phytates and tannins decrease considerably the absorption <strong>of</strong> non heme iron,<br />
especially in foods <strong>of</strong> plant origin. Thus, ionizable iron at pH 7.5 can be used as a valid measure<br />
<strong>of</strong> bio-availability <strong>of</strong> iron from horse gram grain.<br />
Assessment <strong>of</strong> Soil Erodibility Indices for Beed Station<br />
M. More Ram* and A. Ananya Mishra<br />
College <strong>of</strong> Agricultural Engineering & Technology, VNMKV, Parbhani-431602, M.S.<br />
*ramlvs4ru@gmail.com<br />
T5-13P-1065<br />
Soil erodibility, which is a major factor in erosion prediction and land use planning. The<br />
Wischmeier and Smith (1963) formula was used to determine the erodibility indices <strong>of</strong> soil<br />
samples. Soil erodibility is the degree <strong>of</strong> resistance to the impact <strong>of</strong> raindrops on the soil surface<br />
and the shearing action <strong>of</strong> run<strong>of</strong>f water. Soil erodibility factor can be used to predict the Soil losses<br />
from different locations. Erodibility is susceptibility and vulnerability <strong>of</strong> soil get eroded and it plays<br />
important role to soil erosion. The data required for the erodibility estimation i.e. soil properties<br />
are not easily available at Beed station. The soil properties such as soil texture class index, soil<br />
permeability, organic matter content and % sand + % <strong>of</strong> very fine sand + % <strong>of</strong> silt (100 - clay %).<br />
These parameters were investigated and used to determine the erodibility index k at various<br />
locations. In present study, selected five location are A, B, C, D and E. The soil erodibility factor<br />
K for A, B, C, D and E are 0.046, 0.057, 0.056, 0.023, 0.046, respectively. The average annual soil<br />
loss in t ha -1 yr -1 was also estimated for each location to confirm the area that is more prone to<br />
erosion. The soil losses from this respective location are 37.81, 46.85, 46.03, 18.90, 37.81 t ha -1 yr -<br />
1 . The soils were analyzed to have greater proportions <strong>of</strong> sand to silt and clay thus, found to be<br />
erodible, comparing the erodibility indices obtained with the standard erodibility indices provided<br />
by Olson (1984). Provision <strong>of</strong> adequate soil conservation structures, drainage facilities, wind<br />
breakers or shelter belts is recommended to protect the first 60cm depth within these areas from<br />
wind and water erosion especially, as the soils have proved to be erodible. These soil erodibility<br />
indices will be helpful for erosion prediction model at Beed district station.<br />
Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment<br />
728 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
T5-14P-1084<br />
Floor Management Machinery for Weed Control in Horticulture Crops<br />
Sanjeeva Reddy, B; Ashish S. Dhimate, I. Srinivas; R.V. Adake and R.V. Mallikarjuna<br />
ICAR-Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture Hyderabad, Telangana–500059, India<br />
Horticultural sector made strides at national level with record production <strong>of</strong> 300.6 m tons<br />
from 24.85m ha area in 2016 -17, which is an increase <strong>of</strong> 9.5% and outpaced the food grain<br />
production, since 2012-2013. In recent years, farmers are shifting from traditional<br />
subsistence farming to commercial horticulture with technical inputs <strong>of</strong> research and constant<br />
government support programs (Meghwal et al,.2018). As in case <strong>of</strong> field crops, weeds cause<br />
upto 50% loss in fruit yield. Mechanical manipulation under dryland conditions, is<br />
problematic due to increased risk <strong>of</strong> moisture loss and soil erosion. So, the cultivation<br />
practices should be strategically adopted as part <strong>of</strong> an integrated weed management approach<br />
to achieve optimum response. Management <strong>of</strong> weeds with suitable and synergistic machines<br />
with possible lowest soil manipulation protects the top soil <strong>of</strong> horticulture crops thus helps<br />
to improve the fertility for better growth and improved productivity. The other method <strong>of</strong><br />
supressing weed growth is growing cover crops which also need farm equipment for better<br />
management and to protects top soil and supplement organic matter to the soil. Therefore,<br />
keeping these points in view, ICAR-Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture,<br />
Hyderabad developed weed control floor management machines suitable for horticulture<br />
crops.<br />
Methodology<br />
There is a growing demand for controlling weeds without use <strong>of</strong> herbicides. The machinery<br />
like mowers and slashers have the advantage <strong>of</strong> enabling weeds and unwanted vegetation<br />
control in all weather conditions. In this category three types <strong>of</strong> machines namely (i). Tractor<br />
back mounted PTO operated mower (ii). Side mounted rotary disc with hydraulic power unit<br />
(iii). Cover crop shredding machine and its related components were developed.<br />
Development details <strong>of</strong> Machines: (i) Tractor back mounted PTO operated mower consists<br />
<strong>of</strong> three main parts: a rectangular frame <strong>of</strong> 1.6X1.6 m in size made <strong>of</strong> 90x12mm flat to which<br />
5mm thick mild steel metal sheet was welded throughout the frame; a speed reduction<br />
gearbox with right angle drive fitted at the middle <strong>of</strong> the rectangular frame with bolts and<br />
nuts. The horizontal shaft leading into the gearbox can be attached to the tractor PTO. The<br />
vertical shaft from the gearbox will drive the mowing blades (2 no- 700x10mm size)<br />
sharpened on the leading side; and a standard three-point hitch system is provided to the<br />
frame by welding straight flats and angle iron flats at required positions. (ii) Side mounted<br />
rotary disc with hydraulic power unit basically consists <strong>of</strong> two components, the first one is a<br />
Hydraulic power pack which is fitted over a carriage frame attached to the tractor three-point<br />
729 | Page Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
hitch system and the pack gets power from tractor Power take <strong>of</strong>f shaft. The second<br />
component is multi-functional tool bar holder fitted to tractor chassis just in front <strong>of</strong> rear<br />
tyres. The power pack carriage frame was rectangular in shape (180cm x 67cm size) made<br />
with a mild steel square bar <strong>of</strong> 50x50x5mm. The frame was provided two support pneumatic<br />
wheels <strong>of</strong> 5x12 ply rating for easy field mobility without much vibration’s due to activation<br />
<strong>of</strong> various hydraulic components. (iii) Cover crop shredding machine consisted <strong>of</strong> a<br />
rectangular shaped tubular frame (2015mm x 490 mm) coved all three sides except front,<br />
power transmission system with gearbox, chain and sprocket arrangement and a rotor unit<br />
with hinged blades. The rotor shaft is 1850mm in length made <strong>of</strong> hallow pipe <strong>of</strong> 190 mm<br />
outer diameter with 10 mm thick wall and with splined shafts <strong>of</strong> 150mm length at both the<br />
ends. The hinged blades with bolting fixers on the rotor were arranged by providing 60mm<br />
length brackets (30x5mm size) at an angular space <strong>of</strong> 1200 welded at regular intervals on<br />
shaft. Inverted Y shaped and 200mm effective length metal blades were arranged having<br />
inner cutting edge bevelled to reduce the cutting force. A standard three-point hitch<br />
arrangement was fabricated with mild steel flats and fitted to the shredder main frame<br />
assembly.<br />
Results<br />
Frequent use <strong>of</strong> cultivator to control weeds does not conserve soil organic matter, so need to<br />
promote soil friendly machines, which will minimally disturb the soil. The developed weed<br />
control floor management machines were tested under different conditions to verify its<br />
intended purposes. The tractor back mounted PTO operated mower is able to reach the<br />
tightest spaces with ease in horticulture crops. The machine lateral heavy-duty blades allow<br />
it to both mowe weed biomass and mulch the smaller pruning’s. This machine is found more<br />
suitable for herbs and juicy stemmed grass types weeds. This type <strong>of</strong> machine was developed<br />
in two sizes, one to meet the small and the other to large scale horticulture farmers, those<br />
who are using15 - 22 hp and 35 -45 hp tractors, respectively.<br />
The side mounted rotary disc with hydraulic power pack unit is a two in one modal machine.<br />
Depending on the weed control requirement, either weed biomass mowing rotary disc or<br />
weed control soil mechanical manipulation disc could be fitted interchangeably. The weed<br />
biomass mowing rotary disc working width was 80 cm with 3 knives and 3 special nylon<br />
strings. The machine rotary disc fitted bar was provided with side shift and disc lift<br />
arrangements. A rear independent hydraulic system with proper components and linkages<br />
powers the working head and a 50 plus hp tractor is required to operate this machine.<br />
Several suitable green manure and cover crops were recommended to maintain soil fertility<br />
and as a weed control check in cultivation <strong>of</strong> horticulture crops depending on its properties<br />
and option for use. However, some <strong>of</strong> these legume and non-legume cover crops should be<br />
treated before seed formation for weed control considerations point <strong>of</strong> view and few more<br />
Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment<br />
730 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
for biomass quick biological decomposition, in which the farm equipment come into play a<br />
major role. The ICAR-CRIDA developed crop stalk shredder machine, which shreds both<br />
wine type cover crop such as velvet bean and tall legumes like dhaincha, sun hemp as well.<br />
The machine was tested intensively on several crops for in-situ biomass shredding and as<br />
well as on green manure crops. The machine was able to shred biomass completely <strong>of</strong><br />
dhaincha and sun hemp, leaving a 10 – 15 cm height stubbles over the soil surface. The<br />
machine was also found effective on some field crop stalks like castor, maize and cotton as<br />
well, which are grown as inter crop in the early years <strong>of</strong> horticulture crops. The nature <strong>of</strong><br />
blades provided in the machine severed the stems <strong>of</strong> cut biomass such a way, which avoided<br />
tillering <strong>of</strong> stubbles completely.<br />
Conclusion<br />
The developed machines from this study show that, the machine design parameters play a<br />
significant role on weed or cover crop biomass cutting efficiency. It is concluded that, the<br />
selection <strong>of</strong> machine depends on intended purpose such as soil to be manipulated or biomass<br />
or cover crop to be managed for weed suppression.<br />
References<br />
Vyavasaya Panchangam, S. K. L. 2016. Telangana State Horticulture University. Department<br />
<strong>of</strong> Horticulture, Government <strong>of</strong> Telangana.<br />
Meghwal P. R., Akath Singh, Pradeep Kumar P. S., Khapte and Anurag Saxena. 2018.<br />
Upliftment <strong>of</strong> arid zone economy: Through horticultural and protected cultivation.<br />
Indian Farm., 68(09): 46–51.<br />
T5-15P-1087<br />
Impact <strong>of</strong> eCO2 and eTemp. on Aphis craccivora Koch. on Groundnut and<br />
Projection <strong>of</strong> Future Pest Status<br />
M. Srinivasa Rao*, D. L. A. Gayatri, T. V. Prasad, M. Vanaja, M. Navya and<br />
V. K. Singh<br />
ICAR-Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, Hyderabad, Telangana-500059, India<br />
*msrao909@gmail.com<br />
The global average temperature has risen by around 1°C since pre-industrial times. Even if all<br />
the commitments (called the “Nationally Determined Contributions”) made met, it is projected<br />
that global warming will exceed 3°C by the end <strong>of</strong> the century. The average temperature in<br />
India is projected to rise by approximately 4.4°Cover the recent past (1976–2005 average). An<br />
increase in temperature and elevated CO 2 (eCO 2) influence crop growth significantly and in<br />
turn affect the insect herbivores both directly and indirectly. Though it is known that the<br />
731 | Page Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
increase in temperature will have a greater effect on insects than the rising CO2 condition, the<br />
interactive and combinational effect <strong>of</strong> both parameters is more significant in influencing insect<br />
pests. Aphids, Aphis craccivora Koch. is one <strong>of</strong> the threats to groundnut (Arachis hypogaea<br />
L.) growers in all over the country. Understanding the population dynamics <strong>of</strong> insect pests is<br />
possible through the construction <strong>of</strong> life tables which are dynamic and function <strong>of</strong> various<br />
factors that differ with temperature and no studies are available on the construction <strong>of</strong> life table<br />
considering temperature and CO2 concurrently. Hence, the studies were conducted with the<br />
objectives i. to measure the effects <strong>of</strong> temperatures and eCO 2 on life table parameters <strong>of</strong> A.<br />
craccivora on groundnut ii. to predict the aphid pest scenarios during near and distant future<br />
climate change periods at six locations <strong>of</strong> India.<br />
Methodology<br />
Groundnut (Kadiri-6) seeds were sown in open-top chambers (OTC) at an elevated atmospheric<br />
CO 2 concentration <strong>of</strong> 550 ± 25 ppm CO 2 and ambient CO 2, aCO 2 (400 ± 25 ppm CO 2) and<br />
crop plants were raised during the entire crop season. Feeding trials were carried out (Srinivasa<br />
Rao et al., 2013) at constant temperatures (20, 25, 27, 30, 33 & 35 ± 0.5°C) and CO2 levels<br />
(550 ± 25 ppm and 380 ± 25 ppm) to study the growth and development <strong>of</strong> A. craccivora using<br />
CO2 growth chambers and adopting ‘cut leaf’ method. The life table parameters <strong>of</strong> A.<br />
craccivora were estimated by adopting the TWO SEX–MS Chart s<strong>of</strong>tware (Chi et al., 2005)<br />
by using primary parameters data <strong>of</strong> aphids on groundnut foliage from eCO 2 and aCO 2<br />
independently. Non-linear equations were arrived at after plotting this data against tested<br />
temperatures. The future climate data (maximum and minimum temperature- Tmax and Tmin)<br />
projections <strong>of</strong> the AIB PRECIS emission scenario were considered to estimate future life table<br />
parameters. The future period was designated as near and distant future periods (NF and DF)<br />
with 2021-2050 and 2071-2098 years respectively. The pest status during these periods was<br />
compared over the baseline (BL) period <strong>of</strong> 1961-1990 using future daily temperature<br />
(maximum and minimum) for 6 groundnut cultivating regions <strong>of</strong> the country.<br />
Results<br />
Construction <strong>of</strong> life tables<br />
The life table parameters viz., intrinsic rate <strong>of</strong> increase ‘rm’, net reproduction rate ‘Ro’,<br />
generation time ‘T’, and finite rate <strong>of</strong> increase ‘λ’ were estimated across six constant<br />
temperatures and at aCO2 and eCO2. Further, non-linear models were developed and depicted<br />
in figure 1. Results showed that ‘rm’ increased with an increase in temperature from 20°C and<br />
later started declining from 30°C and followed the non-linear trend at aCO 2 and eCO 2. The<br />
‘Ro’ <strong>of</strong> A. craccivora was higher (79.6) at 27°C with eCO2. The reduction <strong>of</strong> ‘T’ was evident<br />
from 20°C (12.47 days) to 35°C (6.67 days) at eCO 2 and followed the non-linear trend. ‘λ’, the<br />
indicator <strong>of</strong> the reproductive value <strong>of</strong> aphid was found to be increasing from 27-30°C and<br />
Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment<br />
732 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
followed the decreasing trend with further increase in temperature. The best fit quadratic form<br />
<strong>of</strong> the equation with R 2 at eCO 2 was noticed between ‘rm’ and temperature. Other parameters<br />
viz., ‘Ro’, ‘T’, and ‘λ’ followed a similar trend and in our study indicating that eCO 2 influenced<br />
the lifetable parameters <strong>of</strong> A. craccivora significantly as reported earlier by Xie et al. (2014).<br />
Relationship between temperature and life table parameters <strong>of</strong> A. craccivora on groundnut at eCO2 &<br />
Future pest status<br />
aCO2<br />
Across 6 groundnut growing locations <strong>of</strong> the country, it is projected that a substantial increase<br />
<strong>of</strong> mean temperature would occur during NF and DF climate change periods. The quantified<br />
associations <strong>of</strong> life table parameters with the temperature at two CO 2 conditions were adopted<br />
for predicting the future pest status during NF and DF periods. It was predicted that increased<br />
‘rm’ (1.04) and ‘λ’ (2.08) would occur at the Kadiri location during the DF period in<br />
comparison with BL and reflected a similar trend in the NF period also and at the rest <strong>of</strong> the<br />
locations. Increased ‘λ’ implies more females per female <strong>of</strong> A. craccivora per day. The<br />
reduction <strong>of</strong> ‘T’ to 8.96- 9.94 days and varied ‘Ro’ would occur at all locations studied during<br />
DF period over BL. The percent change in ‘rm’ and ‘λ’ was predicted to be significantly higher<br />
at six locations during both NF (up to 93 %) and DF (up to 131 %) periods. The highest percent<br />
reduction <strong>of</strong> generation time ‘T’ is expected to be in DF (up to 12 %) than NF period (up to 2<br />
%). At six locations, Ro was expected to increase in NF (11 %) and decrease during DF (22%)<br />
periods.<br />
Conclusion<br />
The life table parameters viz., ‘rm’ and ‘λ’ would increase with varied ‘Ro’ and reduced ‘T’ in<br />
NF and DF over BL at six groundnut locations implying the higher incidence <strong>of</strong> Aphis<br />
craccivora with a greater number <strong>of</strong> generations during future climate change periods.<br />
733 | Page Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Percent change in pest scenarios (R0 and T) during NF & DF climate change periods over baseline<br />
References<br />
Chi H (2005) TWO-SEX MS Chart; Computer Programe for Age-stage Twosex Life Table<br />
Analysis. National Cheung Hsing University, Taichung, Taiwan.<br />
Srinivasa Rao M, Padmaja PCM, Manimanjari D, Rao VUM, Maheswari M, et al. (2013)<br />
Response <strong>of</strong> Aphis craccivora Koch to elevated CO2 on cowpea. J. Agrometerol. 51: 51-<br />
56.<br />
Xie H, Zhao L, Wang W, Wang Z, Ni X, et al. (2014) Changes in Life History Parameters <strong>of</strong><br />
Rhopalosiphum maidis (Homoptera: Aphididae) under Four Different Elevated<br />
Temperature and CO2 Combinations. J. Econ. Entomol. 107: 1411-1418.<br />
Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment<br />
734 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
T5-16P-1111<br />
Mapping Quantitative Trait Nucleotides in Spring Wheat for Yield<br />
Performance under Limited Water Conditions<br />
Sonia Sheoran 1* , Arpit Gaur 1,2 , Yogesh Jindal 2 , Vikram Singh 2 , Ratan Tiwari 1 ,<br />
K. J. Yahavantha, Gyanendra Singh 1 and Gyanendra Pratap Singh 1<br />
1 ICAR-Indian Institute <strong>of</strong> Wheat and Barley Research, Karnal (123001), Haryana, India<br />
2 Chaudhary Charan Singh Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar (125001), Haryana, India<br />
* Sonia.Sheoran@icar.gov.in<br />
Spring wheat is one <strong>of</strong> the major food crops that provides promising opportunities for present<br />
and future global food security. However, the cultivation and production <strong>of</strong> spring wheat is<br />
critically getting affected with the shrinking natural resources including water. The increasing<br />
frequencies <strong>of</strong> agricultural drought in major spring wheat growing regions have become a<br />
limiting factor for the required grain production and meet the global demand <strong>of</strong> food security.<br />
Therefore, rigorous efforts are required to enhance the drought tolerance features in wheat and<br />
develop climate resilient varieties. Here, a panel <strong>of</strong> 302 diverse spring wheat lines was<br />
evaluated under irrigated (IR), rainfed (RF) and drought (DT) stress conditions at three<br />
locations (Karnal, Hisar and Pune). However, the drought trials were conducted at Karnal under<br />
rain out shelters and rainfed trials were conducted at Hisar and Pune. A total <strong>of</strong> fourteen<br />
agronomic traits: days to heading (DTH), days to anthesis (DTA), grain filling duration (GFD),<br />
days to maturity (DTM), number <strong>of</strong> tillers per plant (NOT), plant height (PH), peduncle length<br />
(PL), spike length (SL), spikelet per spike (SPS), biomass per plant (BM), grain yield per plant<br />
(GY), harvest index (HI), total number <strong>of</strong> grains per plant (TNG), and thousand kernel weight<br />
(TKW), were observed. Mixed linear analysis <strong>of</strong> variance (ANOVA) was calculated with<br />
ASREML-R and best linear unbiased estimates were calculated across environments pooled<br />
by water managements. The panel was genotypes using a 35K Axiom Wheat Breeders’ SNP<br />
array followed by SNP processing as per the standard procedures. A compressed mixed linear<br />
model was used to find out the valid associations between markers and traits (MTA) at -log10(p)<br />
≥ 3.0. The ANOVA indicated substantial genetic variability in the association under each trial<br />
and water management. The Q-Q plots indicated substantial controls over false-positive rate.<br />
A total <strong>of</strong> 637 MTAs were reported for observed traits under IR, RF and DT. These MTAs<br />
were distributed on all chromosomes. Maximum numbers <strong>of</strong> MTA were reported for BM (43),<br />
PL (63) and PH (32) under IR, RF and DT, respectively. The explained percentage <strong>of</strong><br />
phenotypic variance ranged for IR, RF and DT ranged from 4.13 to 52.34, 3.61 to 43.49 and<br />
3.46 to 22.49, respectively. The accumulation <strong>of</strong> favorable allele showed positive and<br />
polygenic impact on the grain yield under each management. The results were in agreement<br />
with previous studies and show considerable potential to strengthen the genomic assisted wheat<br />
breeding program to achieve the required rate <strong>of</strong> genetic gain.<br />
735 | Page Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
T5-17P-1117<br />
Effect <strong>of</strong> Mechanization Practices on Economics <strong>of</strong> Soyabean-Safflower<br />
Cropping System<br />
S. A. Shinde*, P. O. Bhutada and S. B. Ghuge<br />
All India Coordinate Research Project on Safflower, Vasantrao Naik Marathwada Krishi Vidyapeeth<br />
Parbhani, Maharashtra, India.<br />
* santoshashinde338@gmail.com<br />
Oilseed crops are the second most important determinant <strong>of</strong> an agricultural economy, next only<br />
to cereals within the segment <strong>of</strong> field crops. Among oilseeds Safflower (Carthamus tinctorius<br />
L.) is an important oilseed crop with 35-40 % oil. It has been used as a source <strong>of</strong> edible oil and<br />
dying since ancient times. Effective use <strong>of</strong> agriculture machinery helps to increase productivity<br />
and production <strong>of</strong> output and undertake timely farm operations. This judicious use <strong>of</strong> time,<br />
labour, and resources facilitate sustainable intensification and is timely. Planting <strong>of</strong> crops,<br />
leading to an increase in productivity. Hence Mechanical power has become more economical<br />
and indispensable to meet targets <strong>of</strong> timeliness and efficient utilization <strong>of</strong> natural resources and<br />
inputs (Srinivasarao et al., 2013) Mechanization in safflower crop will help to timely field<br />
operations and easy harvesting and save huge cost <strong>of</strong> cultivation and sort the labour problem<br />
<strong>of</strong> the farmer. This study is therefore carried out to determine suitable mechanization practices<br />
in safflower.<br />
Methodology<br />
A field experiment was conducted during the period <strong>of</strong> 2020-21 at All India co-ordinated<br />
Research Project on Safflower, V.N.M.K.V., Parbhani. The soil was clayey in texture, low in<br />
available nitrogen (231 kg ha -1 ), low in available phosphorus (12.64 kg ha -1 ), rich in available<br />
potash (474 kg ha -1 ), sulphur (15.25 kg ha -1 ), and slightly alkaline in reaction. The soil was<br />
moderately alkaline in reaction (8.13 pH). In general, weather conditions were favourable for<br />
plant growth, and no severe pests and diseases were noticed during experimentation. The study<br />
involved two treatment combinations <strong>of</strong> two factors viz., Selective mechanization plot (SMP)<br />
and Farmer practice (FP) with two treatments. Each experimental unit was non-replicated<br />
having a Plot size <strong>of</strong> 1000 m 2 for each <strong>of</strong> the mechanical and normal plots. Sowing was<br />
completed as per treatments. Safflower variety PBNS -86 was sown at a spacing <strong>of</strong> 45 cm<br />
(between rows) X 20 cm (between Plants) The fertilizer dose <strong>of</strong> 60:40:00 NPK kg ha -1 was<br />
applied at the time <strong>of</strong> sowing. The package <strong>of</strong> recommended practices was adopted. The data<br />
on growth and yield parameters were analyzed with paired ‘t’ test and cost <strong>of</strong> cultivation, net<br />
returns, and B: C ratio was worked out. Data on the time period for each operation, and energy<br />
used were converted into suitable energy units and expressed in MJ/ha. Energy equivalents <strong>of</strong><br />
inputs and outputs were computed based on values suggested by Gopalan et al. (1978) The<br />
Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment<br />
736 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
calculation <strong>of</strong> energy input and output equivalents, the indices <strong>of</strong> energy ratio (energy use<br />
efficiency), energy productivity, and net energy were calculated (Rafiee et al., 2010) as<br />
follows:<br />
S.No<br />
1 Sowing<br />
Name <strong>of</strong> field<br />
operation<br />
Energy ratio =<br />
Energy Productivity =<br />
Energy output (MJ/ha)<br />
Energy input (MJ/ha)<br />
Safflower yield (Kg/ha)<br />
Energy input (MJ/ha)<br />
Net Energy = Energy output (MJ/ha) – Energy input (MJ/ha)<br />
Mechanized condition<br />
With Seed cum Fertilizer<br />
Drill<br />
Farmer's practice<br />
Behind the bullock-drawn plough<br />
2 Inter cultivation Power weeder Bullock drew Danthi<br />
3 Plant protection Motorized/ power sprayers Knapsack sprayer<br />
4<br />
Harvesting, threshing,<br />
and winnowing<br />
Combiner with minute<br />
modification<br />
Manual<br />
Following parameters selected under selective mechanization vis-à-vis Farmer's practice in<br />
terms <strong>of</strong> yield, economics, and energy budgeting <strong>of</strong> Safflower<br />
Results<br />
From table, it is found that safflower seed yield (1485 kg/ha) was higher than farmer practice<br />
(1251 kg/ha). The seed yield <strong>of</strong> safflower was increased by 18.70% observed under mechanized<br />
conditions compared to the farmer's practice. Proper plant-to-plant population and optimum<br />
management practice can be adopted under mechanization than farmer practice which helps to<br />
increase or record good growth <strong>of</strong> crops than farmer practice. Further, the cost <strong>of</strong> cultivation<br />
incurred for the normal method <strong>of</strong> cultivation was higher (53921) compared to mechanized<br />
safflower cultivation (45101) leading to higher net returns (100699) and B: C ratio (3.20) in<br />
the mechanized plot. Comparing the yield and economics <strong>of</strong> cultivation methods, mechanized<br />
plot reduced the labour requirement, time <strong>of</strong> operation and cultivation cost, in turn, resulted in<br />
higher benefits. The energy use efficiency in the mechanized plot (0.56 kg/MJ) was higher than<br />
the normal plot (0.27 kg/MJ). This led to saving 17 labour/ha and saved 35 hrs time period/ha<br />
through selective mechanization <strong>of</strong> important operations.<br />
737 | Page Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Safflower yield, system economics under mechanized cultivation vs farmer's practice<br />
Treatments<br />
Mechanized<br />
conditions<br />
Farmer's<br />
practice<br />
Seed yield<br />
(kg/ha)<br />
Biological yield<br />
(kg/ha)<br />
Soybean Safflower Soybean Safflower<br />
Gross<br />
returns<br />
(Rs/ha)<br />
System economics<br />
Cost <strong>of</strong><br />
cultivation<br />
(Rs/ha)<br />
Net<br />
returns<br />
(Rs/ha)<br />
B: C<br />
ratio<br />
1755 1485 4920 4725 145800 45101 100699 3.2<br />
1571 1251 4400 3865 126990 53921 73069 2.4<br />
References<br />
Gopalan, C. B., Ramasastri, V. and Balasubramanian, S. C. 1978 Nutritive value <strong>of</strong> Indian<br />
foods (Hyderbad: National Institute<strong>of</strong> Nutrition)<br />
Rafiee S, Mousavi Avval, S. H. and Mohammadi A. 2010. Modeling and sensitivity analysis<br />
<strong>of</strong> energy inputs for apple production in Iran. Energy, 35:3301-3306<br />
T5-18P-1140<br />
Effect <strong>of</strong> Nano-DAP Application in Combination with Conventional<br />
Fertilizers on Rice-Rapeseed Sequence under Rain-Fed Condition<br />
Dhananjoy Dutta and Manimala Mahato<br />
Department <strong>of</strong> Agronomy, Bidhan Chandra Krishi Viswavidyalaya,<br />
Mohanpur-741252, West Bengal, India<br />
Excessive use <strong>of</strong> DAP fertilizer in rice production <strong>of</strong> West Bengal resulted several soil and<br />
environment hazards. The overall efficiency <strong>of</strong> applied fertilizer has also been declined, which<br />
necessitates alternative nutrient management. Hence, attempts were being made to find out the<br />
effect <strong>of</strong> nano-DAP as an alternative source <strong>of</strong> conventional fertilizer on growth, yield and<br />
economics <strong>of</strong> rice-rapeseed predominant crop sequence.<br />
Methodology<br />
Field experiment was conducted during 2021-22 at Department <strong>of</strong> Agronomy, B.C.K.V, West<br />
Bengal in a randomized block design with three replications where transplanted rice (cv. IET-<br />
4786) grown in kharif season (July-October) under rain-fed condition with thirteen treatments<br />
(Table 1) followed by rapeseed (cv. B-9) in rabi season (November-February) under ten<br />
treatments (Table 2) in sandy clay loam with pH 6.65, organic carbon 5.8 g/kg, available N<br />
159.2 kg/kg, available P 2O 5 44.9 kg/kg and available K 2O 101.8 kg/kg. As per treatment, nano<br />
DAP was applied through seed treatment, seedlings root dipping and foliar spray along with<br />
conventional DAP, urea SSP and MOP fertilizers. Rainfall in rice and rapeseed growing period<br />
Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment<br />
738 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
was 995 and 194 mm respectively. Other standard agronomic package <strong>of</strong> practices were<br />
followed both the crops.<br />
Results<br />
Results revealed that 50% basal N and P through DAP along with seed treatment by nano-DAP<br />
@ 5 ml/kg seed and foliar spray <strong>of</strong> nano-DAP @ 2 ml/lit at 30 DAT exhibited maximum plant<br />
height (101.03 cm), LAI (2.48), dry matter accumulation (1006.38 g/m 2 ), tiller number/hill<br />
(17.67), root length/hill (27.23 cm), number <strong>of</strong> panicle/m 2 (170.92), number <strong>of</strong> grains/panicle<br />
(113.48), grain yield (4250 kg/ha), straw yield (6378 kg/ha) <strong>of</strong> rice. This treatment enhanced<br />
14.96% <strong>of</strong> grain yield over control (no basal DAP) and also showed higher net return (Rs.<br />
40358/ha) and benefit-cost ratio (1.93) than others. In rapeseed, the tallest plant (95.95 cm),<br />
highest values <strong>of</strong> leaf area index (3.51), dry matter accumulation (410.32 g/m 2 ) and primary<br />
branches/plant (8.87) were obtained with N75 P75 K100 + nano DAP seed treatment @ 5 ml/ kg<br />
seed & foliar spray @ 0.2% at 30 DAS and the lowest growth was observed in control plots<br />
(N 0 P 0 K 100). No. <strong>of</strong> siliquas/plant (60.90), no. <strong>of</strong> seeds/siliqua (17.12), seed yield (767 kg/ha),<br />
straw yield (1540 kg/ha), gross return (Rs. 46020/ha), net return (Rs. 22661/ha) and benefitcost<br />
ratio (1.97) were also highest under this treatment, which increased seed yield by 21.38 %<br />
over control.<br />
Conclusion<br />
The preliminary study showed the promising effect <strong>of</strong> nano-DAP as seed treatment @ 5 ml/kg<br />
seed and foliar application @ 2 ml/lit at 30 DAT along with 100% recommended doses <strong>of</strong> NPK<br />
in rice where 50% basal N and P applied through DAP, therefore, curtailed 50% DAP<br />
requirement. Again, nano DAP @ 5 ml/ kg seed treatment and @ 0.2% foliar spray at 30 DAS<br />
reduced 25% N and P requirement without affecting rapeseed yield. However, the study needs<br />
few more years for recommendations to the farmers.<br />
Effect <strong>of</strong> nano-DAP on growth parameters, yield <strong>of</strong> Kharif rice in 2021<br />
Treatments<br />
Plant height<br />
(cm)<br />
Panicles/m 2<br />
Grain yield<br />
(kg/ha)<br />
Benefit-cost<br />
ratio<br />
T 1 : 0% P & 0% Basal N (No Basal DAP); 100% N<br />
&K (Control)<br />
95.73 155.56 3697 1.80<br />
T 2 :100% NPK (100% Basal DAP) 99.20 166.12 3945 1.80<br />
T 3 :25% Basal DAP (100% NPK) 97.01 160.87 3743 1.73<br />
T 4 :50% Basal DAP (100% NPK) 97.26 161.58 3895 1.79<br />
T 5 :T 1 + ST with Nano-DAP @ 2.5 ml/kg seed+ FS<br />
with Nano-DAP @ 2 ml/lit at 30 DAT<br />
T 6 :T 1 + ST with Nano-DAP @5 ml/kg seed+ FS with<br />
Nano-DAP @ 2ml/lit at 30 DAT<br />
98.18 164.77 3885 1.87<br />
98.43 165.02 3895 1.87<br />
739 | Page Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
T 7 :T 3 + ST with Nano-DAP @ 2.5 ml/kg seed + FS<br />
with Nano-DAP @ 2 ml/lit at 30 DAT<br />
100.33 166.31 4088 1.87<br />
T 8 :T 3 + ST with Nano-DAP @ 5 ml/kg seed+ FS with<br />
Nano-DAP @ 2ml/lit at 30 DAT<br />
T 9 :T 4 + ST with Nano-DAP @ 2.5 ml/kg seed+ FS<br />
with Nano-DAP @ 2 ml/lit at 30 DAT<br />
T 10 :T 4 + ST with Nano-DAP @ 5 ml/kg seed+ FS<br />
with Nano-DAP @ 2ml/lit at 30 DAT<br />
T 11 :T 1 + SRD with Nano-DAP @ 0.5%+ FS with<br />
Nano-DAP @ 2ml/lit at 30 DAT<br />
T 12 :T 3 + SRD with Nano-DAP @ 0.5%+FS with<br />
Nano-DAP @ 2ml/lit at 30 DAT<br />
T 13 :T 4 +SRD with Nano-DAP @ 0.5%+ FS with<br />
Nano-DAP @ 2ml/lit at 30 DAT<br />
100.43 169.25 4121 1.88<br />
100.47 170.65 4213 1.91<br />
101.03 170.92 4250 1.93<br />
97.90 163.04 3889 1.86<br />
98.83 165.43 3997 1.82<br />
99.07 165.98 4033 1.80<br />
CD at 5% 1.47 4.34 134<br />
ST = Seed treatment, FS = Foliar spray, SRD = Seedlings root dipping, 100% NPK= 60:30:30kg/ha<br />
Effect <strong>of</strong> Nano-DAP on growth parameters, yield <strong>of</strong> rapeseed during 2021-22<br />
Treatments<br />
Plant height<br />
(cm)<br />
Siliquas/<br />
plant<br />
Seed yield<br />
(kg/ha)<br />
Benefitcost<br />
ratio<br />
T 1: N 0 P 0 K 100 (control) 85.03 41.96 603 1.84<br />
T 2: N 100 P 100 K 100 (80:40:40 kg/ha) 93.37 56.07 752 1.89<br />
T 3: N 0 P 0 K 100+ Nano DAP (ST @ 5ml/kg seed) 87.77 45.00 626 1.91<br />
T 4: N 0 P 0 K 100 + Nano DAP (ST @ 10ml/kg seed) 88.19 46.53 633 1.93<br />
T 5: N 0 P 0 K 100+ Nano DAP (FS @ 0.6% at 30 DAS) 90.92 48.60 670 1.90<br />
T 6: N 0 P 0 K 100 + Nano DAP (ST @ 5ml/kg seed & FS<br />
@ 0.6% at 30 DAS)<br />
91.46 51.13 679 1.92<br />
T 7: N 75 P 75 K 100 + Nano DAP (FS @ 0.2% at 30 DAS) 93.22 58.76 738 1.90<br />
T 8: N 75 P 75 K 100 + Nano DAP (ST @ 5 ml/ kg seed &<br />
FS @ 0.2% at 30 DAS)<br />
95.95 60.90 767 1.97<br />
T 9: N 50 P 50 K 100 + Nano DAP (FS @ 0.4% at 30 DAS) 92.18 53.40 693 1.82<br />
T 10: N 50 P 50 K 100 + Nano DAP (ST @ 5ml/ kg seed &<br />
FS @ 0.4% at 30 DAS)<br />
93.77 60.13 709 1.87<br />
CD at 5% 2.71 1.21 15.7<br />
ST = Seed treatment and FS = Foliar spray<br />
Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment<br />
740 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
T5-19P-1141<br />
Effect <strong>of</strong> Nano Fertilizers on Growth Yield and Water Use Efficiency <strong>of</strong><br />
Potato (Solanum tuberosum l.) under Varying Irrigation Schedules<br />
Manimala Mahato and Dhananjoy Dutta<br />
Department <strong>of</strong> Agronomy, Bidhan Chandra Krishi Viswavidyalaya,<br />
Mohanpur, Nadia, West Bengal, India 741252<br />
Indiscriminate and over application <strong>of</strong> irrigation water and chemical fertilizers led to several<br />
detrimental effects on crop production system and environment. Therefore, introduction <strong>of</strong><br />
nano fertilizers as an alternative source <strong>of</strong> conventional fertilizers has become a new area <strong>of</strong><br />
research. Besides that, irrational irrigation to water demanding crop, like potato during the post<br />
monsoon season affects the growth and productivity. Therefore, a field experiment was<br />
delineated with the objective to assess the effect <strong>of</strong> nano fertilizers on growth, yield and water<br />
use efficiency <strong>of</strong> potato under various irrigation schedules based on cumulative pan<br />
evaporation (CPE).<br />
Methodology<br />
Field experiment was conducted at B.C.K.V. during rabi seasons <strong>of</strong> 2019-20 and 2020-21 in<br />
sandy loam alluvial soil (inceptisol) designed in split plot with three irrigation schedules at I 1-<br />
15 mm, I 2-30 mm and I 3-45 mm <strong>of</strong> CPE kept as main plot treatments and five nutrient<br />
management practices like N1-100% RDF (200:150:150 kg/ha <strong>of</strong> N: P2O5: K2O), N2-75%<br />
RDF+ nano fertilizers (N, P, K at 80:40:40 ppm), N 3-100% RDF+ Nano-Zn (10 ppm), N 4-75%<br />
RDF+ nano fertilizers (N, P, K and Zn at 80:40:40:10 ppm) and N5-Nano-fertilizers (N, P, K<br />
at 80:40:40 ppm) as subplot treatments replicated thrice. All nano fertilizers were applied as<br />
foliar spray at 25 and 50 DAP. Potato (variety Kufri Himalini) was planted in 60 cm ×15 cm<br />
spacing during middle <strong>of</strong> November in 4.8 m × 3 m plot along with other standard package <strong>of</strong><br />
practices.<br />
Results<br />
Pooled result reported that irrigation at 15 mm CPE along with 100% RDF and Nano-Zn (10<br />
ppm) (I 1N 3) treatments recorded significantly higher plant height (61.76 cm) at 60 DAP, dry<br />
matter accumulation (579.85 g m -2 ) at 90 DAP, tuber no per hill (8.59) and tuber yield (23.04<br />
t ha -1 ). In all cases lower values were obtained from irrigation at 45 mm CPE with nano<br />
fertilizers (N, P, K) alone treatment (I 3N 5). However, irrigation at 45 CPE along with 100%<br />
RDF and Nano-Zn (10 ppm) (I3N3) treatment recorded higher water use efficiency (9.96 kg m -3 ).<br />
741 | Page Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Conclusion<br />
The study concluded that irrigation at 15 CPE and 100% RDF along with Nano-Zn (10 ppm)<br />
can be recommended for higher productivity <strong>of</strong> potato. However, in water scarce region,<br />
irrigation at 45 CPE along with 100% RDF and Nano-Zn (10 ppm) may be effective due to<br />
highest water use efficiency.<br />
Effect <strong>of</strong> irrigation and nutrient management on growth, yield and water use efficiency<br />
<strong>of</strong> potato (pooled)<br />
Treatments<br />
Plant height<br />
(cm)<br />
(60 DAP)<br />
Dry matter<br />
(g m -2 )<br />
(90 DAP)<br />
Tuber no<br />
per hill<br />
Yield<br />
(t ha -1 )<br />
WUE<br />
(kg m -3 )<br />
Irrigation (I)<br />
I 1 (15 mm CPE) 57.93 476.72 7.71 19.57 4.70<br />
I 2 (30 mm CPE) 51.00 367.96 5.68 15.41 6.96<br />
I 3 (45 mm CPE) 47.07 297.23 4.46 12.31 8.03<br />
S. Em. (±) 0.19 4.78 0.05 0.11 --<br />
C. D. (P= 0.05) 0.73 18.75 0.19 0.41 --<br />
Nutrient Management (N)<br />
N 1 (100% RDF) 53.07 403.29 6.38 17.11 6.46<br />
N 2[75% RDF + NF (N, P, K)] 51.42 371.83 6.13 16.01 6.06<br />
N 3 (100% RDF+ N-Zn) 55.73 473.46 6.70 19.02 7.20<br />
N 4[75%RDF+NF (N, P, K, Zn)] 54.17 439.11 6.25 18.15 6.88<br />
N 5 [NF (N, P, K)] 45.60 215.49 4.28 8.53 3.23<br />
S. Em. (±) 0.14 3.70 0.05 0.12 --<br />
C. D. (P= 0.05) 0.40 10.79 0.15 0.34 --<br />
Interaction (I × N)<br />
I1N1 58.87 510.69 8.18 21.47 5.14<br />
I1N2 57.07 468.32 7.93 19.88 4.78<br />
I1N3 61.76 579.85 8.59 23.04 5.54<br />
I1N4 59.60 545.07 8.06 22.41 5.38<br />
I1N5 52.36 279.65 5.77 11.07 2.66<br />
I2N1 52.29 381.75 5.98 16.57 7.47<br />
I2N2 50.44 357.38 6.03 15.81 7.12<br />
I2N3 54.59 465.10 6.35 18.74 8.48<br />
I2N4 53.66 420.80 6.01 17.60 7.98<br />
I2N5 44.03 214.78 4.03 8.31 3.76<br />
I3N1 48.06 317.42 4.98 13.29 8.67<br />
I3N2 46.76 289.78 4.43 12.33 8.04<br />
I3N3 50.86 375.43 5.16 15.29 9.96<br />
I3N4 49.25 351.48 4.69 14.44 9.44<br />
I3N5 40.41 152.05 3.04 6.21 4.05<br />
I×N N×I I×N N×I I×N N×I I×N<br />
N×I<br />
S. Em. (±)<br />
0.20 --<br />
0.24 0.40 6.40 10.55 0.09 0.13 0.29<br />
C. D. (P= 0.05)<br />
0.59 --<br />
0.69 0.95 18.69 24.85 0.26 0.30 0.66<br />
NF: Nano Fertilizers, N-Zn: Nano Zn<br />
Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment<br />
742 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Soil Moisture and Weather Data Management Using IoT<br />
T5-20P-1165<br />
N. S. Raju, N. Ravi Kumar, R. Nagarjuna Kumar, K. S. Reddy and B. Sanjeev Reddy<br />
Central Research for Dryland Agriculture, Hyderabad.<br />
The application <strong>of</strong> IoT in agriculture could be a life-changer for humanity and the whole planet.<br />
Currently, we witness how extreme weather, deteriorating soil, dry lands, and collapsing<br />
ecosystems make food production more and more complicated and expensive. In India, where<br />
60-70% economy depends on agriculture, there is a great need to modernize conventional<br />
agricultural practices for better productivity. In this project, we have established IOT sensor<br />
Network with ESP 8266 (Node MCU) Microcontroller board and other sensors LM 100 is a<br />
Soil moisture sensor, DHT11 for Temperature, a humidity sensor, and a Raindrop sensor to<br />
collect rainfall information. We have collected data from the IoT sensors are that then<br />
transmitted back to a central point (or the cloud) for analysis, visualization, and trend analysis.<br />
The complete system has been developed and deployed on a pilot scale, where the sensor node<br />
data is wirelessly collected using web services into a remote server. The temperature, humidity,<br />
soil moisture, and rainfall information is collected in 10 minutes intervals and transferred to<br />
remote locations with Arduino Wi-Fi technology. The data stored in this system can be<br />
accessed from anywhere through the internet. Farmers today use systems for precision<br />
measurement <strong>of</strong> environmental conditions called weather stations. Automatic Weather<br />
Station (AWS) is used for real-time information on weather at the farm level but it is not<br />
affordable to the farming community. The alternative system for the measurement <strong>of</strong> weather<br />
parameters through IoT-based weather monitoring through sensors is much cheaper compared<br />
to the present cost <strong>of</strong> AWS.<br />
Internet <strong>of</strong> Things (IOT):<br />
It is the future technology <strong>of</strong> connecting the entire world at one place. All the objects, things<br />
and sensors can be connected to share the data obtained in various locations and<br />
process/analyses that data for coordinating the applications like traffic signaling, mobile<br />
health monitoring in medical applications and industrial safety ensuring methods, etc. As<br />
per the estimation <strong>of</strong> technological experts, 50 billion objects will be connected in IOT by 2020.<br />
IOT <strong>of</strong>fers wide range <strong>of</strong> connectivity <strong>of</strong> devices with various protocols and various properties<br />
<strong>of</strong> applications for obtaining the complete machine to machine interaction.<br />
Internet <strong>of</strong> Things (IoT):<br />
IoT device includes every object that can be controlled through the Internet. IoT in agriculture<br />
uses robots, drones, remote sensors, and computer imaging combined with continuously<br />
progressing machine learning and analytical tools for monitoring crops, surveying, and<br />
743 | Page Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
mapping the fields, and providing data to farmers for rational farm management plans to save<br />
both time and money. All the objects, things, and sensors can be connected to share the data<br />
obtained in various locations and process/analyses that data for coordinating the various<br />
applications. As per the estimation <strong>of</strong> technological experts, 50 billion objects will be<br />
connected in IoT by 2020.<br />
Methodology<br />
In IoT enabled weather monitoring system different sensors were used (temperature, humidity,<br />
moisture, rain). These four sensors are directly connected to Node MCU.<br />
Temperature<br />
Humidity Sensor<br />
Soil Moisture Sensor<br />
Arduino Uno<br />
Node MCU<br />
Microcontroller<br />
IoT Sensor Network<br />
Wi Fi Module<br />
Web Page<br />
Arduino Uno is a microcontroller board developed by Arduino which is an open-source<br />
electronics platform mainly based on the VR microcontroller Atmega328. The current version<br />
<strong>of</strong> Arduino Uno comes with a USB interface, 6 analog input pins, and 14 I/O digital ports that<br />
are used to connect with external electronic circuits. Out <strong>of</strong> 14 I/O ports, 6 pins can be used for<br />
WM output. It allows the designers to control and sense external electronic devices in the real<br />
world. This board comes with all the features required to run the controller and can be directly<br />
connected to the computer through a USB cable that is used to transfer the code to the controller<br />
using IDE s<strong>of</strong>tware, mainly developed to program Arduino. Programming languages like C<br />
and C++ are used in IDE. Apart from USB, a battery or AC to DC adopter can also be used to<br />
power the board. Arduino Uno is the most <strong>of</strong>ficial version that come with Atmega 328 8-bit<br />
AVR Atmel microcontroller where RAM memory is 32KB<br />
Node MCU<br />
Node MCU is a microcontroller board developed by Arduino. Which is an open-source<br />
electronics platform mainly based on the AVR microcontroller Atmega328. The current<br />
version <strong>of</strong> Node MCU comes with a USB interface, 6 analog input pins, and 14 I/O digital<br />
ports that are used to connect with external electronic circuits. Out <strong>of</strong> 14 I/O ports, 6 pins can<br />
be used for PWM output. It allows the designers to control and sense external electronic devices<br />
in the real world. This microcontroller has RAM memory 32KB.<br />
Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment<br />
744 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Wi-Fi Module<br />
The Arduino Uno WiFi is an Arduino Uno with an integrated WiFi module. The board is based<br />
on the ATmega328P with an ESP8266 WiFi Module integrated. The ESP8266 WiFi Module<br />
is a self-contained SoC with an integrated TCP/IP protocol stack that can give access to your<br />
WiFi network One useful feature <strong>of</strong> Uno WiFi is support for OTA (over-the-air) programming,<br />
either for transfer <strong>of</strong> Arduino sketches or WiFi firmware.<br />
Soil Moisture Sensor<br />
Soil moisture sensors measure the contents <strong>of</strong> the soil. Since the direct gravimetric<br />
measurement <strong>of</strong> free-soil moisture requires removing, drying, and weighting <strong>of</strong> a sample, soil<br />
moisture sensors measure the volumetric water content indirectly by using some other property<br />
<strong>of</strong> the soil, such as electrical resistance, dielectric constant, or interaction with neutrons, as a<br />
proxy for the moisture content. Reflected microwave radiation is affected by soil moisture and<br />
is used for remote sensing in hydrology and agriculture. Portable probe instruments can be used<br />
by farmers or gardeners.<br />
Temperature & Humidity Sensor<br />
This DHT11 sensor is used to collect the Temperature and Humidity data from the<br />
environments. It is integrated with a high-performance 8-bit microcontroller. Each DHT11<br />
sensor features extremely accurately.<br />
Results<br />
The sensed data will be automatically sent to the web server when a proper connection is<br />
established with the server device. The web server page which will allow us to monitor and<br />
control the system. The web page gives information about the temperature, humidity, and<br />
rainfall variations in the region, where the embedded monitoring system is placed.<br />
Conclusion<br />
This paper presents an innovative and dependable concept <strong>of</strong> a low-cost simple weather<br />
monitoring and controlling system. The system operates under IoT technology supervision<br />
which effectively optimizes remote areas. This data will be helpful for future analysis and it<br />
can be easily shared with other users also.<br />
745 | Page Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
T5-21P-1166<br />
Comparative Study on Spatial and Temporal Changes in Urban Settlements<br />
and Land Surface Temperature in Hyderabad over 1990 to 2020<br />
Fawaz Parapurath*, B. S. Rath, Deepti Verma, N. Manikandan and A.V.M. Subba Rao<br />
Odisha University <strong>of</strong> Agriculture and Technology, Bhubaneswar – 751003, Odisha, India<br />
ICAR-Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, Hyderabad – 500059, Telangana, India<br />
* faazzz96here@gmail.com<br />
Land Surface Temperature (LST) is a crucial urban and regional meteorological component<br />
that affects how the ground surface interacts with the atmosphere. LST is considered a<br />
significant parameter in many scientific research studies, including global climate change<br />
studies, agricultural processes, and various biogeochemical cycles. The dynamics <strong>of</strong> LST and<br />
Land Use Land Cover (LULC), are important markers <strong>of</strong> forest fragmentation,<br />
industrialization, and urbanization. Unplanned urbanization results in LULC pattern alterations<br />
on a broad scale, which results in ecosystem damage and has a negative impact on public health,<br />
particularly in developing nations. In this work, we used Landsat 5 and 8 imageries to analyze<br />
the LST variations in Hyderabad from 1990 to 2020. The specific objectives <strong>of</strong> this study were<br />
to compute the change in LULC and LST during the study period and to establish the<br />
relationship between land surface temperature and urban settlements.<br />
Methodology<br />
Landsat 5<br />
TM<br />
LULC Map<br />
Landsat 8<br />
OLI<br />
LULC change detection analysis<br />
Spectral Radiance Model<br />
TM Band<br />
Split Window Algorithm<br />
(TIRS) Band 10 & Band 11<br />
LST Map<br />
Impact <strong>of</strong> LULC change on LST<br />
LST Map<br />
Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment<br />
746 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
The methodological framework adopted for analyzing variation in land surface temperature<br />
distribution in response to land use/land cover change using the Split window algorithm (TIRS,<br />
Landsat-8) and Spectral radiance model (TM, Landsat-5) is represented in the figure above.<br />
Results<br />
LULC change detection: The change detection study reveals that Built-up area/Urban<br />
settlements have increased by 10 sq. km and Vegetation land decreased by 7.5 sq. km with no<br />
considerable land use change in Water bodies from 1990 to 2020.<br />
LST change detection: The year-wise LST conveys that, the average land surface temperature<br />
has increased by 4.5 0 C from 1990 to 2020. During the time period from 2010 to 2020, LST<br />
increased by a maximum rate (3.2 0 C).<br />
Spatial and Temporal distribution <strong>of</strong> LST in Hyderabad over 1990-2020<br />
Relationship between LST and Urban Settlements: The time series analysis <strong>of</strong> LST and urban<br />
settlements revealed that LST increases correspondingly with the increase in settlements since<br />
there is a strong correlation (r = 0.94).<br />
747 | Page Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
250<br />
y = 0.33x - 474.9<br />
182 185 188 192<br />
R² = 0.9945<br />
200<br />
150<br />
100<br />
y = 0.143x - 258.64<br />
26.5 27 27.8 R² = 0.8335 31<br />
50<br />
0<br />
1990 2000 2010 2020<br />
Year<br />
Land Surface Temperature (0C)<br />
Linear (Land Surface Temperature (0C))<br />
Urban Settlements (Sq.km)<br />
Linear (Urban Settlements (Sq.km))<br />
Comparison between LST and Urban Settlements over 1990-2020<br />
Conclusion<br />
To develop successful strategies to reduce the amplitude <strong>of</strong> the Urban Heat Island effect, it is<br />
critical to comprehend the relationship between LST and urban surface features. It is also<br />
possible to immediately determine the crop water status or the rate <strong>of</strong> transpiration using the<br />
surface temperature <strong>of</strong> the vegetation as measured by remote sensing. However, trees are<br />
crucial in densely populated metropolitan areas because they provide a cooling effect during<br />
hot weather that has a direct impact on the microclimate.<br />
References<br />
Guo, G, Wu Z, Xiao R, Chen Y, Liu X. and Zhang X, 2015. Impacts <strong>of</strong> urban biophysical<br />
composition on land surface temperature in urban heat island clusters. Landsc Urban<br />
Plan. 135: 1-10.<br />
Roy, B., Bari, E., Nipa, N. J. and Ani, S. A. 2021. Comparison <strong>of</strong> temporal changes in urban<br />
settlements and land surface temperature in Rangpur and Gazipur Sadar, Bangladesh<br />
after the establishment <strong>of</strong> City Corporation. Remote Sens. Appl.: Soc.<br />
Environ. 23:100587.<br />
Rozenstein, O., Qin Z, Derimian Y. and Karnieli A. 2014. Derivation <strong>of</strong> land surface<br />
temperature for Landsat-8 TIRS using a split window algorithm. Sensors. 14(4): 5768-<br />
5780.<br />
Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment<br />
748 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
T5-22P-1178<br />
Usefulness <strong>of</strong> Agro-Meteorological Advisory Service from Farmers<br />
Prospective in the NICRA Operated Villages <strong>of</strong> Godda District<br />
Jharkhand<br />
Rajnish Prasad Rajesh, Ravi Shanker, Surya Bhushan, Anjani Kumar,<br />
Amarendra Kumar and Mukesh Kumar<br />
GVT-KVK, Godda, Jharkhand Director - ATARI-IV, Patna,<br />
Godda is one <strong>of</strong> the most backward districts <strong>of</strong> India situated in Santhal Pargana <strong>of</strong> Jharkhand<br />
state. Farmers <strong>of</strong> this district are largely dependent on agriculture-based economy. Majority <strong>of</strong><br />
the farmers largely comes under the category <strong>of</strong> small and marginal. The only source <strong>of</strong> income<br />
is the small piece <strong>of</strong> land for earning means <strong>of</strong> livelihood. Agriculture over the years has now<br />
become more diversified in the district and has shifted to the higher value crops. The trend <strong>of</strong><br />
climate change is causing deviation in rainfall patterns. Scanty, spatial rainfall and intermittent<br />
dry spells are also affecting the climate change prone area frequently. In this direction, National<br />
Innovation on Climate Resilient Agriculture (NICRA) is working in four climate vulnerable<br />
villages viz. Bhelwa, Dropad, Gadhi and Gunghasa <strong>of</strong> Poraiyahat block <strong>of</strong> the district Godda.<br />
The district requires an integrated approach for the proper management practices <strong>of</strong> crops,<br />
livestock and soil along with the new improved technologies. In the present scenario The study<br />
assessed the service through the farmer’s feedback in the NICRA and non-NICRA villages.<br />
Baethgen et al., 2003 stated that the AAS is essential for the development <strong>of</strong> farmers and the<br />
formal and informal knowledge play a key role in the decision-making process in the<br />
agricultural practices. Agro-meteorological advisory service was found a vital element for<br />
farmer’s knowledge as well as their mindset so a proper coordination among various<br />
development actors like GO, NGO, private agencies and policy makers need to be strengthened<br />
to reduce climate change (Lenka et al., 2022). Agro-met Advisory Service can contribute to<br />
the crop and livestock management practices as per the weather conditions and need <strong>of</strong> the<br />
hour for enhancing the agricultural production and productivity. AAS is the real time need <strong>of</strong><br />
the farmers (Gandhi et al; 2018).<br />
AAS were helpful to the farmers for pr<strong>of</strong>itable and sustainable agricultural production by<br />
managing the climate risk effectively (Ramachandrappa et al., 2018). Micro level weather<br />
advisories with ground realities and information can readily be used in making crucial decision<br />
and strategies in farming are much more realistic to the farmers as compared to the<br />
meteorological information <strong>of</strong> macro level. This information will enable the policymakers to<br />
understand at micro level implications <strong>of</strong> agriculture contingent measures against climate<br />
change.<br />
749 | Page Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Methodology<br />
This study is a kind <strong>of</strong> test control study which is a combination <strong>of</strong> both quantitative and<br />
qualitative research techniques to compare the (test groups) NICRA farmers against (the<br />
control groups) non-NICRA farmers from villages Bhelwa, Dropad, Gadhi and Gunghasa <strong>of</strong><br />
Godda district were selected based on the agro-ecological variation. Random sampling method<br />
has been followed for the selection <strong>of</strong> respondent farmers. The period <strong>of</strong> study and assessment<br />
were from 2020-21 to 2021-22 through the feedbacks and suggestions collected from the<br />
farmers in the NICRA and non-NICRA villages. Four villages <strong>of</strong> one block Poraiyahat were<br />
selected under the NICRA project and one non-NICRA village was selected randomly. 30<br />
farmers were selected in the selected each NICRA village by following random process. Total<br />
<strong>of</strong> 120 farmers from NICRA villages and 50 non-NICRA farmers were selected in the sample.<br />
The three-point rating scale was conducted for obtaining the score. Farmers were interviewed<br />
by researchers in the selected villages for the primary data collection. Focus Group Discussion<br />
was conducted among farmers to obtain the information. Collected data were then scrutinized<br />
for the analysis.<br />
Results<br />
Weather Advisory service plays a very crucial role in deciding farming activities during the<br />
different cropping season. The advisory is the real time need <strong>of</strong> farmers to decide agricultural<br />
and livestock management and practices. Table 1 shows that 30.83% farmers considered<br />
weather advisory very useful and 27.49% farmers useful. Whereas about 23.32% farmers are<br />
satisfied with the advisory but 18.33% found it irrelevant. In non-NICRA villages more than<br />
50% farmers expressed that the weather advisory service is either satisfactory or irrelevant for<br />
them. The weather forecasting need to be more accurate and on time specially during the<br />
monsoon. Hence, the weather advisory needs to be explored in much better way to reach the<br />
farmers on time so as to tackle and mitigate the climatic hazards. In the selected NICRA village,<br />
the scenario <strong>of</strong> weather advisory was not significantly different (p=0.678). The details are<br />
mentioned below.<br />
NICRA<br />
Village<br />
Feedback on Weather Advisory<br />
Very Useful Useful Satisfactory Irrelevant<br />
Number % Number % Number % Number %<br />
Dropad 10 33.33 7 23.33 5 16.66 8 26.66<br />
Gadhi 9 30 7 23.33 8 26.66 6 20<br />
Gunghasa 10 33.33 10 33.33 7 23.33 3 10<br />
Bhelwa 8 26.66 9 30 8 26.66 5 16.66<br />
The chi-square statistic is 6.5983. The p-value is .678863. The result is not significant at p < .05.<br />
Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment<br />
750 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
NICRA<br />
Total<br />
Non<br />
NICRA<br />
Village<br />
37 30.83 33 27.49 28 23.32 22 18.33<br />
8 16 13 26 10 20 19 38<br />
The chi-square statistic is 4.3363. The p-value is .887921. The result is not significant at p < .05.<br />
In the non-NICRA village 38% stated that weather advisory service was irrelevant, 20%<br />
considered it satisfactory while 42% farmers accepted it as very useful or useful to them. This<br />
scenario was much better in NICRA villages in comparison to non-NICRA village (p=0.887).<br />
The management <strong>of</strong> weather and climate risks in agriculture has become an important issue<br />
due to climate change. Wise use <strong>of</strong> weather and climate information can help to make better<br />
policy, institutional and community decisions that reduce related risks and enhance<br />
opportunities, improve the efficient use <strong>of</strong> limited resources and increase crop, livestock and<br />
fisheries production (Chattopadhyay et al., 2021).<br />
Advisories related to agricultural knowledge, information and management practices from crop<br />
selection, field preparation to harvesting were under the agricultural advisory service which<br />
was found that 38.33% farmers considered it very useful while about 30% farmers found it<br />
useful. But 19.16% farmers stated it as satisfactory and 12.49% farmers found it irrelevant that<br />
needs to be addressed as a grey area and has to be worked on in a better way to outreach the<br />
maximum number <strong>of</strong> farmers on time. In the selected village the scenario was not significantly<br />
different (p=0.716). The details are as follows:<br />
NICRA<br />
Village<br />
Feedback on Agricultural Advisory service<br />
Very Useful Useful Satisfactory Irrelevant<br />
Number % Number % Number % Number %<br />
Dropad 11 36.66 7 23.33 7 23.33 5 16.66<br />
Gadhi 10 33.33 8 26.66 9 30 3 10<br />
Gunghasa 13 43.33 10 33.33 4 13.33 3 10<br />
Bhelwa 12 40 11 36.66 3 10 4 13.33<br />
The chi-square statistic is 6.2357. The p-value is .716111. The result is not significant at p < .05.<br />
NICRATotal 46 38.33 36 29.99 23 19.16 15 12.49<br />
Non NICRA<br />
Village<br />
9 18 14 28 6 12 21 42<br />
The chi-square statistic is 20.1251. The p-value is .00016. The result is significant at p < .05.<br />
Conclusion<br />
Since, climate change has now become the reality, severely affecting the agricultural<br />
production and productivities directly or indirectly, Agro-meteorological Advisory Service<br />
(AAS) played a vital role to aware the farmer and improving their knowledge in adopting<br />
751 | Page Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
different management practices as per the weather conditions Agro-met Advisory Service was<br />
significantly higher in NICRA villages than non-NICRA village. The coordination among<br />
various sectors like District Agriculture Office, ATMA, Agriculture Extension Functionaries,<br />
District Administration, NGOs, FPOs, GVT-Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Godda etc. needed to be<br />
more strengthened to mitigate the impact <strong>of</strong> climate change on agriculture and allied activities<br />
by popularizing the AAS among farmers for adopting and timely following Agro-met Advisory<br />
Service (AAS).<br />
References<br />
Baethgen, Walter E.; Holger, Meinke and Agustin Gimenez (2003). Adaptation <strong>of</strong> agricultural<br />
production systems to climate variability and climate change: lessons learned and<br />
proposed research approach. In Climate Adaptation. net conference Insights and Tools<br />
for Adaptation: Learning from Climate Variability, pp. 18-20.<br />
Chattopadhyay N. (2021). Weather and climate-based farm advisory services. J.<br />
Agrometeorology, 23 (1) : 1-2.<br />
Gandhi, Gurupreet, Singh J, Chaudhary L and Kamlesh Kumar Sahu (2018). Farmers feedback<br />
about the agromet advisory services (AAS) at Mahasamund district <strong>of</strong> Chattisgarh. J.<br />
Pharma. and Phyto., 5 : 2522-2524.<br />
Lenka Sasank, Panigrahi, R. S., Satpathy, Abhijeet (2022). Farmers opinion on the usefulness<br />
<strong>of</strong> agro advisory services in the NICRA operated districts <strong>of</strong> Odisha. Indian Res. J. Ext.<br />
Edu., pp. 64-67.<br />
T5-23P-1194<br />
Use <strong>of</strong> UNEP Aridity Index for Drought Assessment in Bundelkhand<br />
Sunil Kumar<br />
Bihar Agricultural University, Sabour, Bhagalpur-813210, Bihar, India<br />
Drought is a natural phenomenon that results from a deficiency <strong>of</strong> rainfall from expected<br />
rainfall or normal rainfall and which may exist over a season or for longer period and is<br />
insufficient to satisfy the need for water for human activities and the environment.<br />
Bundelkhand region has faced a no. <strong>of</strong> times drought which has made the life <strong>of</strong> the people<br />
worst. A number <strong>of</strong> the widely used drought indices include Palmer Drought Severity Index<br />
(PDSI), Standardized Precipitation Index (SPI), Crop Moisture Index (CMI), UNEP Aridity<br />
Index and Surface water system Index (SWSI). In this study, UNEP Aridity index was used to<br />
monitor drought in Bundelkhand region.<br />
Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment<br />
752 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Methodology<br />
The Bundelkhand region consists <strong>of</strong> thirteen districts: seven in Uttar Pradesh- Jhansi, Jalaun,<br />
Lalitpur, Hamirpur, Mahoba, Banda and Chitrakoot, and six in Madhya Pradesh - Datia,<br />
Tikamgarh, Chattarpur, Damoh, Sagar and Panna. This is situated just below the Indo-Gangetic<br />
plain and is extending to the north with the undulating Vindhyan range spread across the<br />
northwest to the south. It is situated between 23°20’ and 26°20’ N latitude and 78°20’ and<br />
81°40’ E longitude. The daily gridded data (maximum temperature, minimum temperature,<br />
mean temperature and rainfall) for the duration <strong>of</strong> 1990 to 2019 were obtained from India<br />
Meteorological Department, Pune, India. Aridity index (AI) based on UNEP (1992) to quantify<br />
the drought occurrence at each study location was used. This index was derived from two<br />
important climatic elements for agriculture and reflects both the atmospheric supply (rainfall)<br />
and atmospheric demand (evapotranspiration), i.e. two important factors affecting the water<br />
budget <strong>of</strong> the land surface. The reference evapotranspiration (ETo) was calculated by using<br />
temperature method given by Hargreaves and Samani (1985) and modified by Hargreaves et<br />
al., (1985). As per the UNCCD definition, area which are sensitive to drought are<br />
<strong>of</strong>ten divided into three categories, namely arid, semi-arid, dry sub-humid. If this index is less<br />
than 0.5 then dry condition occurs in the area. Drought occurrences were examined based on<br />
the frequencies <strong>of</strong> events for every drought category for all 13 districts coming under this<br />
region. The percentage <strong>of</strong> drought occurrence was obtained by taking the ratio <strong>of</strong> drought<br />
occurrences to the total drought occurrences for a particular time and particular drought<br />
category as given by Sonmez et al., 2005. The drought occurrence probabilities were calculated<br />
by using each drought event for all stations in each district in Bundelkhand region.<br />
Results<br />
In Banda district Chhatarpur and Chitrakoot districts, in most <strong>of</strong> the years in June, October and<br />
in whole season, there was dry condition. In Chitrakoot district, there was more severe<br />
condition and cases <strong>of</strong> hyper arid and arid condition were also more in comparison to these<br />
other two districts. In the districts, Damoh, Datia and Hamirpur, Hamirpur was more affected<br />
by dry conditions and there were more cases <strong>of</strong> hyper arid condition. In Datia also there were<br />
more cases <strong>of</strong> dry condition but arid condition was more prevailing than hyper arid and no. <strong>of</strong><br />
cases were lesser than Datia. In Jalaun, Jhansi and Lalitpur, all the districts were affected by<br />
dry condition mostly in June and October months. But in the whole season, the condition was<br />
little bit better than individual months. In Jhansi district, dry condition was in more no. <strong>of</strong> years<br />
in comparison to other two districts. In Mahoba, Panna and Sagar, Mahoba was more affected<br />
than other two districts. Hyper arid to arid condition was more in June and October months in<br />
comparison to other three months. In season, there was some dry condition but the condition<br />
was better.<br />
753 | Page Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
In Tikamgarh, hyper arid condition was more in no. in October followed by June month. Arid<br />
condition was also more in these months in comparison to other three months. Among all 13<br />
districts, Datia and Jhansi were more affected and aridity index was very less in June and<br />
October months in comparison to other 11 districts. The monthly and seasonal aridity indices<br />
showed the variability <strong>of</strong> rainfall and its adverse effects that could be seen in the form <strong>of</strong> crop<br />
failures. The highest probability <strong>of</strong> occurrence for Hyper arid (9.33%) was found in Datia<br />
district whereas the probability for Hyper arid (8.00 %) in Jhansi district was found less than<br />
that <strong>of</strong> Datia. The highest percentage for arid category was observed at Datia district again as<br />
14.00 %, while Jhansi district had 12.00 % for arid category. The highest percentage <strong>of</strong><br />
occurrence probability <strong>of</strong> Semi-arid category was detected as 22.67 % at Jalaun and Tikamgarh<br />
districts followed by Chhatarpur district as 22.00 %. In Banda district, Hyper-arid class<br />
contributed only 9.0 % <strong>of</strong> the cases, the arid class contributed 16.0 % and the semi-arid<br />
conditions recurred 27.0 % times out <strong>of</strong> the total number <strong>of</strong> cases. Hyper-arid class contributed<br />
only 8.0 % <strong>of</strong> the cases, the arid class contributed 10.0 % and the semi-arid conditions occurred<br />
33.0 % times out <strong>of</strong> the total number <strong>of</strong> months in Chhatarpur district.<br />
In case <strong>of</strong> Chitrakoot district, Hyper-arid class contributed only 11.0 % <strong>of</strong> the cases, the arid<br />
class contributed 14.0 % and the semi-arid conditions recurred 25.0 % times out <strong>of</strong> the total<br />
number <strong>of</strong> months. Hyper-arid class contributed only 6.0 % <strong>of</strong> the cases, the arid class<br />
contributed 10.0 % and the semi-arid conditions occurred 25.0 % times out <strong>of</strong> the total number<br />
<strong>of</strong> months in Damoh district. In Datia district, Hyper-arid class contributed only 14.0 % <strong>of</strong> the<br />
cases, the arid class contributed 21.0 % and the semi-arid conditions occurred 26.0 % times out<br />
<strong>of</strong> the total number <strong>of</strong> months. Hyper-arid class contributed only 9.0 % <strong>of</strong> the cases, the arid<br />
class contributed 14.0 % and the semi-arid conditions occurred 32.0 % times out <strong>of</strong> the total<br />
number <strong>of</strong> months in case <strong>of</strong> Hamirpur. In Jalaun district, Hyper-arid class contributed only<br />
11.0 % <strong>of</strong> the cases, the arid class contributed14.0 % and the semi-arid conditions occurred<br />
34.0 % times out <strong>of</strong> the total number <strong>of</strong> months. In Jhansi district, Hyper-arid class contributed<br />
only 12.0 % <strong>of</strong> the cases, the arid class contributed 18.0 % and the semi-arid conditions<br />
occurred 29.0 % times out <strong>of</strong> the total number <strong>of</strong> cases. Hyper-arid class contributed only 11.0<br />
% <strong>of</strong> the cases, the arid class contributed 15.0 % and the semi-arid conditions occurred 28.0 %<br />
times out <strong>of</strong> the total number <strong>of</strong> cases in Lalitpur district. In Mahoba district, Hyper-arid class<br />
contributed only 10.0 % <strong>of</strong> the cases, the arid class contributed 15.0 % and the semi-arid<br />
conditions occurred 29.0 % times out <strong>of</strong> the total number <strong>of</strong> months. Hyper-arid class<br />
contributed only 6.0 %o% <strong>of</strong> the cases, the arid class contributed 15.0 % and the semi-arid<br />
conditions occurred 25.0 % times out <strong>of</strong> the total number <strong>of</strong> months Panna district. In Sagar<br />
district, Hyper-arid class contributed only 9.0 % <strong>of</strong> the cases, the arid class contributed 9.0 %<br />
and the semi-arid conditions occurred 25.0 % times out <strong>of</strong> the total number <strong>of</strong> months. In<br />
Tikamgarh district, Hyper-arid class contributed only 9.0 %% <strong>of</strong> the cases, the arid class<br />
contributed 11.0 % and the semi-arid conditions occurred 34.0 % times out <strong>of</strong> the total number<br />
Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment<br />
754 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
<strong>of</strong> months. Vulnerability <strong>of</strong> crops in different districts due to drought may be assessed by using<br />
this index. These results obtained from the study can be used in future to improve the situation<br />
for the Bundelkhand region and it can be utilized for proper planning by Government and<br />
planners for long time to secure the crop yield and to reduce the cost on resources.<br />
References<br />
Hargreaves G.H and Samani Z.A. 1985. Reference crop evapotranspiration from temperature.<br />
Appl. Eng. Agric. 1 (2):96–99.<br />
Hargreaves G. L, Hargreaves G. H and Riley, J.P. 1985. Agricultural benefits for Senegal River<br />
basin. J. Irrig. Drain. ASCE, 111:113–124.<br />
Sonmez F.K, Komuscu A.U, Erkan A and Turgu E. 2005. An analysis <strong>of</strong> spatial and temporal<br />
dimension <strong>of</strong> drought vulnerability in Turkey using the standardized precipitation<br />
index. Nat. Hazards, 35(2): 243-264.<br />
T5-24P-1195<br />
FarmPrecise – An Agromet Advisory Service (AAS) for Sustainable<br />
Agriculture and Resilient Farm Income: An Impact Assessment <strong>of</strong> AAS in<br />
Ahmednagar, Dhule, and Jalna Districts <strong>of</strong> Maharashtra<br />
Nikhil Nikam, Nitin Kumbhar and Ajay Shelke<br />
Watershed Organisation Trust<br />
nikhil.nikam@wotr.org.in, nitin.kumbhar@wotr.org.in, ajay.shelke@wotr.org.in<br />
Earlier, farmers could predict the arrival <strong>of</strong> monsoons based on their past experiences; now,<br />
changing climate makes it challenging to form predictions based on experiences alone.<br />
Therefore, adopting technological innovations is one <strong>of</strong> the most promising ways to adapt to<br />
climate change. Agromet Advisory Services (AAS) are crucial for agricultural planning and<br />
adaptation responses. In December 2017, a baseline study was conducted in 36 villages <strong>of</strong><br />
Ahmednagar, Jalna, and Dhule districts <strong>of</strong> Maharashtra State to understand the status <strong>of</strong><br />
existing agricultural practices and the effectiveness <strong>of</strong> AAS on agriculture. Based on the<br />
responses received from 360 households reported that the advisories were not reaching farmers<br />
on time when they needed, and some were not relevant for these villages. However, farmers<br />
found that the AAS was helpful to them to a limited extent. The study indicated that AAS<br />
requires better distribution channels, accuracy, timely forecasts, extreme weather alert, and<br />
customized crop and local-specific advisories. The insights from the study helped to structure<br />
the features for the FarmPrecise mobile application.<br />
Ever since the launch <strong>of</strong> the FarmPrecise application, there has been an increase in users (50k<br />
plus downloads on google play store), whereby we assumed that the application is helping<br />
755 | Page Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
farmers in some way. Therefore, in December 2021, a mid-term impact study was conducted<br />
with the same respondents to validate the hypothesis. The study was designed with specific<br />
objectives to understand and examine i) use and reach <strong>of</strong> FarmPrecise application along with<br />
other digital technologies, ii) changes in agricultural productivity, iii) changes in the cultivation<br />
costs, iv) Comparison between FarmPrecise users and business-as-usual farmers for changes<br />
in crop productivity, v) changes between FarmPrecise users and business-as-usual farmers for<br />
crop losses due to extreme weather events.<br />
The findings showed that the crop productivity <strong>of</strong> major crops <strong>of</strong> FarmPrecise users was higher<br />
than that <strong>of</strong> the business-as-usual farmers. In addition, a few FarmPrecise users reported that<br />
they avoided crop loss due to receiving advanced extreme weather alerts through the mobile<br />
application. Moreover, the average household income from agricultural sources has also<br />
increased compared to the baseline scenario. The real-time weather information, updated<br />
market rates, agriculture news, crop-specific weather-based advisories, farm diary, and<br />
community forum are some <strong>of</strong> the prominent features <strong>of</strong> the FarmPrecise application farmers<br />
use to become aware and cope with climate extremes events.<br />
T5-25P-1219<br />
Assessment <strong>of</strong> Biophysical Parameters and Disease Incidence in Mungbean<br />
Using Hyperspectral Radiometry<br />
M. Prabhakar*, K. A. Gopinath, N. Ravi Kumar, U. Sai Sravan, M. Thirupathi, G.<br />
Sravan Kumar, P. Likhita, S. Madhu Naga Sekhar Reddy and R. Naresh<br />
ICAR-Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, Hyderabad – 500 059, Telangana, India<br />
*m.prabhakar@icar.gov.in<br />
Mung bean (Vigna radiata L.) is an important pulse in India and is <strong>of</strong>ten experiencing biotic<br />
stress in the rainy season. Cercospora Leaf Spot (CLS) is an important fungal disease <strong>of</strong> mung<br />
bean, making its cultivation difficult and causing sizable loss to the production up to 60%<br />
(Bharti et al., 2017). CLS has been found to appear in the epiphytotic form causing enormous<br />
loss to the farmers (Vijaya Bhaskar, 2020). Timely management will help in preventing the<br />
spread <strong>of</strong> disease. Radiometry <strong>of</strong>fer scope to detect biotic and abiotic stress (Prabhakar et al.,<br />
2013). The spectral features vary noticeably between healthy and infested plants depending on<br />
the extent <strong>of</strong> damage. Therefore, present study was carried out with an objective to find out the<br />
impact <strong>of</strong> CLS on biophysical parameters in mungbean using spectral features extraction.<br />
Methodology<br />
A field experiment was carried out in 2018 rainy (kKharif) season at Gungal Research Farm,<br />
ICAR-Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, Hyderabad. The experiment was laid<br />
out in randomized block design with eight nutrient management treatments viz., T 1:<br />
Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment<br />
756 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Unamended control; T2: 100% RDF; T3: 75% RDF + 20 kg S ha -1 ; T4: 100% RDF + 20 kg S<br />
ha -1 ; T 5: 75% RDF + 30 kg S ha -1 ; T 6: 100% RDF + 30 kg S ha -1 ; T 7: 75% RDF + 40 kg S ha -<br />
1 ; T 8: 100% RDF + 40 kg S ha -1 , replicated thrice. The crop was sown in 4.2 × 3.0 m 2 plots by<br />
adopting a seed rate <strong>of</strong> 20 kg ha -1 and 30 cm row to row spacing. The RDF used was 20-40-0<br />
kg NPK ha -1 and the entire quantity <strong>of</strong> fertilizers (NPK) were applied as basal before sowing.<br />
The disease incidence (CLS) was observed at the time <strong>of</strong> flowering. Based on visual symptoms<br />
<strong>of</strong> damage, CLS infestation levels were categorized into four grades <strong>of</strong> severity viz. grade 1<br />
(healthy), grade 2 (low), grade 3 (medium) and grade 4 (severe). The biophysical parameters<br />
(biomass, SPAD value and seed yield) were recorded under different severity grades. Canopy<br />
reflectance data from mungbean (15 plants per each grade) were recorded with FieldSpec 3 Hi-<br />
Res spectroradiometer (ASD 1999; spectral range: 350-2500 nm).<br />
Results<br />
The biophysical parameters <strong>of</strong> mungbean infested with CLS varied significantly under different<br />
severity grades As mentioned in the table. With the increase in CLS incidence, the SPAD value<br />
decreased by 22.9%. Fresh and dry biomass also varied significantly with CLS, however, the<br />
trends were not consistent. The fresh and dry biomass <strong>of</strong> mungbean under severely infested<br />
CLS was reduced by 30.1% and 38.5% compared to healthy plants. With increase in the<br />
severity <strong>of</strong> CLS infestation the yield had declined significantly. The maximum yield loss was<br />
observed in severely infested crop followed by medium CLS infestation compared to healthy<br />
plants. The seed yield was reduced in infested plants by 38.1% (across three grades) compared<br />
to healthy.<br />
SPAD value, biomass and seed yield <strong>of</strong> mungbean under different grades <strong>of</strong> CLS<br />
infestation<br />
Severity Grade<br />
SPAD value<br />
Fresh biomass<br />
(g plant -1 )<br />
Dry biomass<br />
(g plant -1 )<br />
Seed yield<br />
(g plant -1 )<br />
Healthy 52.40 ± 5.69 a 42.42 ± 7.77 a 8.57 ± 2.11 a 2.02 ± 0.18 a<br />
Low 45.10 ± 1.35 b 38.25 ± 8.93 a 7.66 ± 1.29 ab 1.49 ± 0.25 b<br />
Medium 45.10 ± 1.35 b 35.93 ± 5.91 ab 6.84 ± 1.54 b 1.31 ± 0.15 c<br />
Severe 40.37 ± 0.94 c 29.64 ± 7.59 b 5.27 ± 1.65 c 0.96 ± 0.10 d<br />
Values are Mean ± SD, different superscript letters denote significant difference (p < 0.05)<br />
Mean canopy reflectance <strong>of</strong> different CLS severity grades from the field based hyperspectral<br />
radiometry studies showed a distinct difference between healthy and infested plants in the<br />
figure at different levels <strong>of</strong> infestation as described in the figure. Reflectance from the CLS<br />
infested plants compared to healthy was high in visible region (400-750 nm) and was lower in<br />
near infra-red region (750-1100 nm). Healthy plants have higher reflectance in NIR region and<br />
low reflectance in the visible region.<br />
757 | Page Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Ground-based Hyperspectral reflectance spectra under different severity grades <strong>of</strong> CLS in mungbean<br />
Conclusion<br />
Results <strong>of</strong> this study confirmed that CLS infestation significantly reduced the chlorophyll,<br />
biomass and seed yield in mungbean. The variations in spectral reflectance <strong>of</strong>fer scope to detect<br />
the CLS disease severity and associated loss in yield.<br />
References<br />
Bharti M, Chandra R, Kumar A, Kumar R, Yadav and Yadav P. (2017). Enzymatic response<br />
<strong>of</strong> mungbean (Vigna radiata) genotypes against Cercospora leaf spot disease. Indian J.<br />
Agric. Sci. 87: 930-933.<br />
Prabhakar M, Prasa Y. G. Desai S, Thirupathi M. 2013. Spectral and spatial properties <strong>of</strong> rice<br />
brown plant hopper and groundnut late leaf spot disease infestation under field<br />
conditions. J. Agrometeorol. 15:57‒62.<br />
Vijaya Bhaskar A. 2020. New sources <strong>of</strong> genotypes against leaf spot and powdery mildew<br />
diseases in Greengram. J. pharmacogn. phytochem. 9(5): 455-460.<br />
Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment<br />
758 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
T5-25P-1296<br />
Non-Destructive and Rapid Estimation <strong>of</strong> the Foliar Nitrogen <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Tomato Plant by Proximal Hyperspectral Remote Sensing Pl. Biochemical<br />
Properties: Nitrogen<br />
Md. Zafar, B. U. Choudhury*, H. Das, R, Narzari, and V. K. Mishra<br />
ICAR Research Complex for NEH Region, Umiam, Meghalaya- 793103<br />
* burhan3i@yahoo.com<br />
Dynamic fertilizer management is a means <strong>of</strong> making soil nutrients available for plant<br />
development, according to their needs, which is the main aim <strong>of</strong> precision agriculture. Soil<br />
nitrogen (N) is one <strong>of</strong> the most important essential nutrients for optimal crop growth and<br />
yield. It is a key component <strong>of</strong> enzymes, vitamins, chlorophyll and other cellular components,<br />
all <strong>of</strong> which are critical to crop growth and development. It is therefore one <strong>of</strong> the most<br />
important essential nutrients to optimize crop yields, including tomato plants. Too much<br />
nitrogen can reduce yields while the nitrogen deficit relative to the plant uptake requirement<br />
has also stunted the plant vegetative growth and reduces yields. The destructive measure for<br />
periodic monitoring <strong>of</strong> the nutritional state <strong>of</strong> plants in this situation is not a logical option. The<br />
traditional destructive method is time-consuming, error-prone, competence-oriented, and<br />
requires a well-equipped laboratory for measurements. This makes it difficult to remediate in<br />
real time, including fertilizing based on laboratory measurements. However, with advances in<br />
hyperspectral proximal remote sensing technology, plant N estimation can be conducted<br />
quickly and non-destructively while being economic and repetitive in monitoring.<br />
Spectroscopy techniques are a technology that requires the acquisition <strong>of</strong> data in spectral bands<br />
and based on the most sensitive bands, a predictive model can be developed to predict nitrogen<br />
as well as other plant biochemical properties.<br />
In this study, we have attempted to develop a non-destructive hyperspectral proximal remote<br />
sensing-based estimation method for predicting the N concentration <strong>of</strong> standing tomato<br />
plants. For this, we used multiple and multi-date foliar spectral reflectance measurements from<br />
an ASD 2 handheld Spectroradiometer and correlated with destructive lab measurements on<br />
multiple occasions. Finally, a predictive model was developed for the estimation <strong>of</strong> foliar<br />
nitrogen concentrations <strong>of</strong> tomato plants in the field based on the periodically measured<br />
reflectance and the concentration <strong>of</strong> foliar nitrogen in the laboratory while using Advanced<br />
Machine Learning Techniques (e.g. Random forest, Support vector machine, Ridge<br />
regression) in addition to Multi-linear regression.<br />
759 | Page Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Methodology<br />
In the present study, tomato as a test crop was grown under stress-free outdoor conditions at<br />
the ICAR Research Complex for NEH, Umiam, Meghalaya. Periodic measurements <strong>of</strong> the<br />
spectral reflectance <strong>of</strong> standing tomato culture were taken in increments <strong>of</strong> 325 to 1075 nm by<br />
handheld field Spectroradiometer (ASD Handheld 2) and correlated with the concentration <strong>of</strong><br />
N measured in the lab (Jackson, 1973). The reflectance data measured periodically were<br />
processed using the SG filter (Savitzky and Golay 1964) to obtain both smoothed and<br />
normalized spectra. To select the variables (grouping and predictor), the correlation coefficient<br />
and stage discrimination analysis (SDA) were performed on a large data set to identify sensitive<br />
wavelength regions). Sensitive wavelength zones were identified as visible (401-702nm) and<br />
NIR (702-1020nm). Follow the multiple linear regression (MLR) model and three machine<br />
learning algorithms such as Random Forest (RF), Ridge regression (RR), Support vector<br />
machine (SVM) regression also being performed while selecting the satisfactory prediction<br />
model based on R-square and RMSE values.<br />
Results<br />
Reflectance in visible and NIR areas has been shown to be sensitive to nitrogen<br />
concentration from tomato growth. Plant N concentration was best predicted using reflectance<br />
in the visible (401-702 nm) region, more specifically wave bands at 550nm and 678 nm in<br />
the visible region. The smoothed spectra yielded satisfactory results with Random Forest<br />
Regression (R 2 = 0.91; RMSE: 0.072) in comparison with SVM, MLR and Ridge Regression.<br />
Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment<br />
760 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Conclusion<br />
Tomato plant and the spectral reflectance curve (Smoothened at Vis-NIR)<br />
Monitoring nitrogen levels in plants help in periodic remedial actions for optimum plant<br />
growth. The predictive model equation developed using machine learning algorithms and<br />
progressive discrimination analysis (SDA) in this study could be helpful in estimating tomato<br />
leaf nitrogen concentrations quickly and non-destructive. Therefore, we can substitute<br />
carefully (with repeated validation on large datasets) the traditional destructive laboratory<br />
method, known for the variety <strong>of</strong> accuracy based on the time and skills.<br />
Predictive models for estimating leaf nitrogen using tomato crop spectral reflectance (R<br />
= reflectance)<br />
Discriminated<br />
Sensitive<br />
Spectral<br />
region<br />
(nm)<br />
Sensitive<br />
bands<br />
(nm)<br />
Most<br />
Sensitive<br />
band(nm)<br />
Model<br />
Predictive Model<br />
Smooth 410 – 1020<br />
550, 678,<br />
Y =<br />
678 RF<br />
853, 972<br />
0.203+90.24*R678<br />
Smooth 410 – 1020<br />
550, 678,<br />
Y =<br />
678 SVM<br />
853, 972<br />
0.696+81.96*R678<br />
Smooth 410 – 1020<br />
550, 678,<br />
Y =<br />
678 RR<br />
853, 972<br />
0.653+82.95*R678<br />
Smooth 410 – 1020<br />
550, 678,<br />
Y =<br />
678 MLR<br />
853, 972<br />
0.753+81.45*R 678<br />
*RF: Random Forest, SVM: Support vector machine, RR: Ridge regression, MLR: multilinear<br />
regression<br />
References<br />
Kharat R. B, and Deshmukh D. R. R. 2016. Analysis <strong>of</strong> Effective Leaf Nitrogen Concentrations<br />
in Tomato Plant using Vegetation Indices. Int. J. Eng. Sci. Comp, 18(2), 2397-2400.<br />
761 | Page Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Ito H and Morimoto S. Non-destructive determination <strong>of</strong> lycopene in tomatoes using<br />
visible/near-infrared spectroscopy. Journal <strong>of</strong> the Illuminating Engineering Institute <strong>of</strong><br />
Japan, 2009, 93, 510-513.<br />
Pourdarbani R, Sabzi S, Rohban M. H, García-Mateos G and Arriba J. I. 2021. Non-destructive<br />
nitrogen content estimation in tomato plant leaves by Vis-NIR hyperspectral imaging<br />
and regression data models. Applied Optics, 60(30): 9560-9569.<br />
ASD Inc. 2010. FieldSpec® HandHeld 2 Spectroradiometer User Manual.<br />
T5-27P-1332<br />
Assessment <strong>of</strong> Soil Fertility Constraints in Shrirampura Micro-Watershed,<br />
Turuvekere Taluk, Tumkur District, Karnataka Using Geospatial<br />
Techniques<br />
K. T. Aruna, B. G. Vasanthi, B. Mamatha and A. Sathish<br />
University <strong>of</strong> Agricultural Sciences, GKVK, Bangalore<br />
The study was conducted in Shrirampura micro-watershed, Turuvekere tauk, Tumkur district<br />
under southern dry zone <strong>of</strong> Karnataka, Agro ecological sub region 8.2 (AESR 8.2) to assess<br />
the soil fertility constraints using geospatial techniques. The world view-2 and LISS-IV merged<br />
satellite data at the scale <strong>of</strong> 1:7920 were used in conjunction with the cadastral map as a base<br />
for detailed survey. A total <strong>of</strong> 54 geo-referenced representative surface soil samples (0–20 cm)<br />
were collected at 320 m 2 grid interval from different land use and land forms with a microwatershed<br />
area <strong>of</strong> 537 ha. Soil samples were analyzed for pH, EC, organic carbon, available<br />
nitrogen, available phosphorus, available potassium and micronutrients (Fe, Mn, Cu, and Zn).<br />
The spatial distribution maps were developed by using krigging method. Major portion <strong>of</strong> the<br />
watershed area was showed that, the soils were neutral to (44.6 %) to slightly alkaline (45.9 %)<br />
and non-saline in nature. The organic carbon (OC) status ranged from low (72 %) to medium<br />
(21 %) and the entire micro watershed area was found to be low in available nitrogen (N)<br />
content. The soil available phosphorus (P) was low (39.7 %) to medium (53.3 %), available<br />
potassium (K) was medium (70.2 %) to high (18.8 %) and available sulphur (S) in medium<br />
category. Regarding available micronutrients, copper (Cu), iron (Fe) and manganese (Mn) were<br />
sufficient in range and zinc (Zn) was found to be deficient (58.9 %) to sufficient (34.1 %) in<br />
the study area. The developed thematic maps by using geospatial techniques in the study area<br />
identified that OC, N, P and Zn were important soil fertility constraints indicating their<br />
immediate attention to achieve sustainable productivity. The generated information can help<br />
the researchers, farmers and planners to manage the natural resources for future planning.<br />
Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment<br />
762 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
T5-28P-1333<br />
Assessing Impact <strong>of</strong> Dry Spells on Sorghum Productivity over Telangana<br />
State<br />
Santanu Kumar Bal*, N. Manikandan, A.V.M. Subba Rao, M.A. Sarath Chandran<br />
and Fawaz Parapurath<br />
ICAR-Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, Hyderabad – 500059 India<br />
* santanu.bal@icar.gov.in<br />
Rainfed agriculture is practiced over India in 67% <strong>of</strong> net sown area. The livelihood <strong>of</strong> 40%<br />
population <strong>of</strong> the country is supported and 44% <strong>of</strong> food grain production in India is met by this<br />
ecosystem. Rainfall during southwest monsoon period is very crucial for kharif season crops<br />
and the yearly rainfall variation during this season have pr<strong>of</strong>ound impact on the rainfed crop<br />
production. The yield <strong>of</strong> rainfed crops is mainly determined by the distribution <strong>of</strong> southwest<br />
monsoon rainfall or occurrence <strong>of</strong> dry spells during the crop growing period. Sorghum is one<br />
<strong>of</strong> the important rainfed food grain crops and cultivated over 1.19 lakhs ha. in Telangana state<br />
(AAP, 2021). The dry spell is a period where the weather has been dry, for an abnormally long<br />
time, shorter but not as severe as a drought (Wilhite and Glantz, 1985). The frequency <strong>of</strong> dry<br />
spells is <strong>of</strong>ten used as a potential indicator <strong>of</strong> moisture stress conditions, in the management <strong>of</strong><br />
water resource systems, particularly for agriculture (Gocic and Trajkovic, 2013). In this<br />
context, an attempt has been made to develop Dry Spell Index (DSI), to quantify the frequency<br />
and duration <strong>of</strong> dry spells during kharif (June-Sep) season over Telangana state at district level.<br />
Trend in DSI and effect <strong>of</strong> dry spell on sorghum productivity in different districts <strong>of</strong> Telangana<br />
state was also carried out.<br />
Methodology<br />
The district level daily rainfall data for the period 1991-2020 was used in this study to compute<br />
the DSI. The value <strong>of</strong> the dry spell was worked out as the number <strong>of</strong> dry days divided by 7. For<br />
example, the weightage value <strong>of</strong> a dry spell with 7-days duration will be 1.0, 10-days will be<br />
1.43, 14-days will be 2.0 and 21-days will be 3.0 and so on. Later, values <strong>of</strong> all dry spells during<br />
SWM were cumulated and the Dry Spell Index (DSI) was arrived for that season (Bal et al.<br />
2022). The value <strong>of</strong> DSI is directly proportional to the increase in the number and duration <strong>of</strong><br />
dry spells within the season. An algorithm in Fortran program was developed to work out the<br />
DSI for each year for each district in the study area during the period 1991–2020.<br />
The district-wise crop area and productivity <strong>of</strong> sorghum for the period 1997–2016 was<br />
collected from web portal <strong>of</strong> Ministry <strong>of</strong> Agriculture and Farmers Welfare, Government <strong>of</strong><br />
India (http://www.aps.dac.gov.in). Major sorghum growing districts in Telangana state were<br />
selected on the basis <strong>of</strong> average crop growing area <strong>of</strong> sorghum with ≥ 500 ha. The time series<br />
yield data was de-trended using linear regression method (Gommes and Hoefsloot, 2006) for<br />
763 | Page Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
obtaining stationary yield data. Mann Kendall test, a non-parametric test was employed to find<br />
the trend in DSI and the significance in the trend was detected by two-tailed test at 95%<br />
probability levels. Pearson’s correlation coefficients <strong>of</strong> de-trended sorghum yield with DSI<br />
were worked out for all selected districts <strong>of</strong> Telangana.<br />
Results<br />
The DSI value ranged between 3.6 and 8.2 in different districts <strong>of</strong> Telangana state. The spatial<br />
distribution <strong>of</strong> average DSI over the period 1991–2020 across the districts indicate that, it was<br />
highest (8.2) in Jogulamba Gadwal district followed by Nalgonda (8.10) and Hyderabad (8.01)<br />
while the lowest DSI was observed in Bhadradri Kothagudam (3.6) followed by J. Bhupalpally<br />
(3.9), Mancherial and Komaram Bheem (4.0) (Fig. 1a). Mann-Kendall trend analysis showed<br />
that the DSI is declining in all the districts <strong>of</strong> Telangana. However, significant decreasing trend<br />
(at 5% level) was noticed in Adilabad, Hyderabad, Kamareddy, Karimnagar, Khammam,<br />
Nizamabad, Siddipet, Suryapet and Yadagiri Bhuvagiri districts (Fig. 1b). This indicate that<br />
the occurrence <strong>of</strong> dry spells and its duration has reduced during the study period. The Pearson<br />
correlation analysis indicate that around 41 per cent area under sorghum in Telangana state is<br />
having significant negative correlation with DSI.<br />
Conclusion<br />
In the present study Dry Spell Index was computed to find the spatial distribution, trend and<br />
influence <strong>of</strong> dry spells during kharif (June-Sep) season on sorghum productivity over<br />
Telangana state at district level. Results indicate that, the highest (8.2) DSI was noticed in<br />
Jogulamba Gadwal district and the lowest DSI in Bhadradri Kothagudam (3.6) district.<br />
Significant decreasing trend (at 5% level) in DSI was noticed in Adilabad, Hyderabad,<br />
Kamareddy, Karimnagar, Khammam, Nizamabad, Siddipet, Suryapet and Yadagiri Bhuvagiri<br />
districts. Significant negative relationship was observed in 41 per cent sorghum growing area<br />
<strong>of</strong> Telangana district. Further study is required to find the dry spell occurrence with in the crop<br />
growing period or different phenological stages <strong>of</strong> the crop using DSI to assess the influence<br />
on crop yield.<br />
References<br />
AAP, 2021. Agriculture Action Plan 2020-21. Department <strong>of</strong> Agriculture, government <strong>of</strong><br />
Telangana, Hyderabad, 130p.<br />
Bal S., Sandeep V.M, Vijaya Kumar P, Subba Rao A.V.M., Pramod V.P, Manikandan N,<br />
Srinivasa Rao, Singh N.P. and Bhaskar S. (2022). Assessing impact <strong>of</strong> dry spells on<br />
the principal rainfed crops in major dryland regions <strong>of</strong> India. Agric. Meteorol., 313,<br />
108768 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2021.108768<br />
Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment<br />
764 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Gocic M and Trajkovic S. (2013). Analysis <strong>of</strong> changes in meteorological variables using<br />
Mann–194 Kendall and Sen’s slope estimator statistical tests in Serbia. Global<br />
Planetary Change, 100 (1): 172–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloplacha.2012.10.014<br />
Gommes and Hoefsloot (2006). Crop Monitoring Box documentation, Chapter 4.2. Analysis <strong>of</strong><br />
time series <strong>of</strong> climate and crops to identify trends. Detrending yield, http://www.<br />
https://www.hoefsloot.com/wiki/index.php?title=Chapter14<br />
Spatial distribution <strong>of</strong> DSI (a) and its trend (b) over Telangana State<br />
765 | Page Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
T5-29P-1345<br />
Investigations on Chopping-Cum-Tilling-Cum-Mixing Machine for Straw<br />
Incorporation<br />
Abhishek Patel * , Krishna Pratap Singh, Ajay Kumar Roul, Rohit Dilip Nalawade and<br />
Aman Mahore<br />
ICAR- Central Institute <strong>of</strong> Agricultural Engineering, Bhopal<br />
* abhishekpatel2910@gmail.com<br />
Ex situ and in situ management approaches are preferable methods for straw management. The<br />
developed chopping unit is an in-situ technology that consists <strong>of</strong> two vertical counter rotating<br />
shafts with four serrated blades each. This research is about the construction <strong>of</strong> a straw<br />
chopping cum incorporation unit that uses a rotary impact cutter to cut paddy straw and a rotary<br />
tiller to mix it. This mechanism is made up <strong>of</strong> two vertical shafts, each with two pairs <strong>of</strong> serrated<br />
blade flanges and a rotary tiller behind them. The statnding and loose paddy straw are cut with<br />
the chopping unit, and the pieces <strong>of</strong> straw are mixed into the soil with the rotary tiller. The<br />
machine was put to the test in a freshly harvested rice field, and its performance was compared<br />
to that <strong>of</strong> existing straw incorporation machines such the super seeder, mulcher integrated with<br />
rotavator, and rotavator solely with the designed CIAE chopping cum incorpoation unit. All <strong>of</strong><br />
the machines were evaluated on the basis <strong>of</strong> mixing index (MI), pulverisation index (PI) or<br />
mean weight diameter (MWD), and bulk density at 3 km/hr forward speed, 40% soil moisture<br />
and 17% straw moisture.<br />
The PI <strong>of</strong> the superseeder, mulcher integrated with rotavator, rotavator alone, and CIAE<br />
developed chopping cum incorporation unit were (9.03, 8.60, 10.20, and 8.42 mm), MI (85.18,<br />
91.18, 28.38, and 96.59%) and BD (1.365, 1.360, 1.390, and 1.32 g/cm 3 ), on the other hand.<br />
All <strong>of</strong> the combinations were subjected to a paired t test, which revealed significant differences<br />
between them. According to the results <strong>of</strong> the evaluation, the CIAE-developed machine<br />
outperformed all the equipment under study.<br />
Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment<br />
766 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
T5-30P-1350<br />
Hyperspectral Reflectance: A Promising Tool to Assess the Metabolic Responses to<br />
Drought Stress in Sugarcane<br />
Vinay Hegde 1,2* , Debasmita Mohanty 1 and Jagadish Rane 1<br />
1 ICAR National Institute <strong>of</strong> Abiotic Stress Management, Baramati, Maharashtra<br />
2 Dr Panjabrao Deshmukh Krishi Vidyapeeth, Akola, Maharashtra.<br />
* vinayhegde4189@gmail.com<br />
The deterioration <strong>of</strong> ecological balance and global climate anomalies have led to enhanced<br />
frequencies <strong>of</strong> water scarcity, and drought is emerged as a major impediment to the expansion<br />
<strong>of</strong> agricultural production. This emphasizes enhanced impetus to development <strong>of</strong> drought<br />
tolerant cultivars that can be climate smart. The approaches being currently followed are not<br />
sufficient to achieve this target though there have been significant advances in our<br />
understanding about the mechanisms <strong>of</strong> tolerance to soil moisture stress and possible<br />
application <strong>of</strong> genomics for genetic improvement <strong>of</strong> crops. In this context, the underlying<br />
bottleneck in understanding the manoeuvrable phenotypic responses are being addressed<br />
through phenomics. This advanced approach <strong>of</strong> characterizing plants depends on non-invasive<br />
techniques involving different sensors and automation, Hyperspectral sensors have great<br />
potential to reveal genetic variability in responses <strong>of</strong> crop plants to environmental stimuli<br />
including those due to drought. By integrating this technique in high-throughput field<br />
phenomics, hyperspectral signatures could be more effectively utilized to address the breeding<br />
challenges posed by global climate change. For breeding and management strategies to be<br />
beneficial in increasing water usage efficiency, it is essential to have deeper insights into<br />
drought impacts on crops at different scales starting from whole plant to cellular level. In order<br />
to develop a rapid and non-destructive substitute for conventional methods <strong>of</strong> evaluating plant<br />
traits related to drought response, we employed hyperspectral measurement technique for<br />
detection <strong>of</strong> proline, the key stress metabolite generated by plants during stress. We assessed<br />
spectral signatures in leaves <strong>of</strong> sugarcane seedling exposed to drought in a glasshouse. Leaf<br />
metabolite concentrations, as contrasted to physiological features, detected drought stress<br />
before it was perceptible to the naked eye with validation <strong>of</strong> R 2 value. The results <strong>of</strong> our<br />
experiments explain the efficacy <strong>of</strong> hyperspectral data to the detection <strong>of</strong> a proline in response<br />
to stress in plants. These scientific leads can be carried forward to design phenomics protocols<br />
for screening large number <strong>of</strong> genotypes <strong>of</strong> sugarcane for identification <strong>of</strong> relevant genes<br />
contributing to drought tolerance. These can also guide decision support systems to design<br />
precision agriculture.<br />
767 | Page Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
T5-31P-1373<br />
Photo-Voltaic Solar Power: Alternative Energy for Farm Mechanization<br />
Ravikant V. Adake*, I. Srinivas, B. Sanjeev Reddy, Ashish S. Dhimate, M Mallikarjun,<br />
K. Sammi Reddy and Vinod Kumar Singh<br />
ICAR- Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, Hyderabad-500059, India.<br />
* a.ravikant@icar.gov.in<br />
Sources <strong>of</strong> non-renewable energy are widely used for various agricultural operations in Indian<br />
agriculture. Pre-harvest operations are mainly dependent on tractor, self-propelled machines,<br />
diesel engines etc which need crude oil predominantly. Out <strong>of</strong> total diesel consumption in India,<br />
agricultural sector alone accounts for 13% (Nielsen 2013). Continuous and increased use <strong>of</strong><br />
non-renewable energy sources not only increase environmental pollution but also increases<br />
operational cost as cost <strong>of</strong> crude oil is increasing. From the past half-decade, the cost <strong>of</strong> crude<br />
oil increased by 60-70%. On the other hand, Indian agriculture is deficit <strong>of</strong> farm power<br />
availability to meet challenges <strong>of</strong> food grain production in coming years. Existing farm power<br />
availability need to be increased from 2.76 kW/ha to 4 kW/ha to cope up with the increasing<br />
demand <strong>of</strong> food grains by 2030 (ICAR Annual Report 2020-21).<br />
In this situation, solar energy is an alternative option to generate additional farm power on &<br />
<strong>of</strong>f the farm to reduce environmental pollution and minimize cost <strong>of</strong> cultivation. Solar energy<br />
is amply available in India. On an average, irradiance on horizontal surface in India is 5.6 kWh<br />
m -2 day -1 . In most parts <strong>of</strong> the country, solar power is being used for post-harvest operations<br />
(Srinivas et al., 2016), however, research & development (R&D) on solar powered farm<br />
machinery/implements for pre-harvest operations like tillage, sowing, weeding, sprayings are<br />
very few and most <strong>of</strong> them are either battery operated or on-the-go PV model. Solar powered<br />
weeder with 1-hp electric motor with rotary tiller and co-axial rotary mechanism was developed<br />
and tested for weeding (Adake et al., 2021). At ICAR-Central Research Institute for Dryland<br />
Agriculture (ICAR-CRIDA), Hyderabad experimental model <strong>of</strong> PV based solar power system<br />
was developed for various agricultural operations where solar power system is stationary. This<br />
paper highlights details <strong>of</strong> PV-based solar powered technology for farm mechanization and its<br />
scope in dryland agriculture<br />
Methodology<br />
Development <strong>of</strong> experimental model<br />
Experimental model <strong>of</strong> solar powered prime mover which consists <strong>of</strong> brush-less DC (BLDC)<br />
motor with 1.5 hp, motor controller (48 V; 20 amps), accelerator, maximum power tracking<br />
point (MPPT) device, and 3-hp solar PV Module was developed. Solar PV module and MPPT<br />
device are stationary and rest <strong>of</strong> the parts are movable. A suitable frame was developed to<br />
Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment<br />
768 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
mount 1.5-hp DC motor, motor controller, power transmission system, drive wheels, and hitch<br />
system to attach small operating tools like rotary weeder, blade harrow, cultivator, mini ridgers<br />
etc to make the prime mover for multiple operations. Power to 1.5 hp-motor is drawn from<br />
solar PV module through solar charge controller and motor controller. The output <strong>of</strong> MPPT<br />
device maintains the constant voltage at 55 V and supplies the current in the range <strong>of</strong> 8-18<br />
amps depending upon load exerts during operation. Prime mover is behind with travel speed in<br />
the range <strong>of</strong> 2-5 km/hr. Accelerator also facilitates reverse and forward motion. While<br />
operation 30-meter cable <strong>of</strong> 4 sq.mm was used to draw the power from solar system which<br />
covers approximately an area <strong>of</strong> 0.05 ha.<br />
Field testing<br />
Solar powered prime mover was tested for weeding and shallow tillage at research farm, ICAR-<br />
CRIDA, Hyderabad. Minimum solar irradiance <strong>of</strong> 4 kWh/m 2 /day is received in the month <strong>of</strong><br />
August and maximum <strong>of</strong> 6.6 kWh/m 2 /day is received between March-May with available<br />
sunshine days <strong>of</strong> 310 days. There is great potential to produce electricity by harnessing solar<br />
energy. For weeding, rotary tiller and blade harrow were used. For shallow tillage, blade<br />
harrow and mini ridger were used which are commercially available in local market. During<br />
operation, observations were made on power consumption by different implements and load<br />
exerted due to depth <strong>of</strong> operation.<br />
Results<br />
Preliminary trails were conducted, and performance was tested when solar radiation ranged<br />
between 4kWh/m 2 /day to 6.5 kW/m2/day. It was observed that the weeding tools could be<br />
successfully operated with 80-92% efficiency in kharif season (July-October) with current<br />
consumption within limit <strong>of</strong> design. The power consumption for weeding was similar<br />
irrespective <strong>of</strong> rotary tiller or blade harrow for a given depth <strong>of</strong> operation and width <strong>of</strong> cut. For<br />
shallow tillage the power consumption was higher than cultivator and need good solar<br />
radiation. With 1.5 hp design, 3-tyne cultivator could be operated successfully within limit <strong>of</strong><br />
power availability. Power consumption varied with depth <strong>of</strong> operation and field operations.<br />
Conclusion<br />
Solar powered prime mover <strong>of</strong> 1.5 hp could be viable in dryland agriculture depending upon<br />
availability <strong>of</strong> radiation in cropping season. However, electricity transportation within the field<br />
could be an issue which need to be resolved with appropriate management strategies. Such<br />
solar powered prime mover could be suitable for small farm holders.<br />
769 | Page Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
References<br />
Nielsen. 2013. All India study on sectoral demand <strong>of</strong> petrol and diesel, Petroleum Planning and<br />
Analysis Cell, Ministry <strong>of</strong> Petroleum & Natural Gas, Govt. <strong>of</strong> India.<br />
https://www.ppac.gov.in.<br />
Adake Ravikant V, Srinivas I, Ashish S Dhimate, Reddy B.S, Vijaykumar S and Sammi Reddy<br />
K. 2021. Development <strong>of</strong> solar powered weeder for small farmers in drylands. <strong>Extended</strong><br />
summary In 5th International Agronomy Congress on Agri innovations to combat food<br />
and nutrition challenges organized by Indian Society <strong>of</strong> Agronomy and PJTSAU,<br />
Hyderabad during 23-27 November, 2021<br />
Srinivas Ch, Srinivas I, Adake R. V, Santra P, Rao K.V, Sammi Reddy K, Yadav O.P and<br />
Mohan P Saxena 2018. Utilization <strong>of</strong> renewable energy sources in dryland systems. In<br />
12 th International Dryland Development Conference on “Sustainable Development<br />
Drylands in the Post 2015 World” during 21-24 August 2016 Alexandria, Egypt<br />
T5-32P-1379<br />
Design and Development <strong>of</strong> Planter for Intercropping Castor with Green<br />
Gram<br />
H. S. Chaudhary and R. N. Singh<br />
Centre for Natural Resources Management, Sardarkrushinagar Dantiwada Agricultural University,<br />
Gujarat (India) – 385 506<br />
In India, the area and production <strong>of</strong> castor is 9.10 lakh hectares and 18.89 lakh tones,<br />
respectively (Castor outlook report - July 2021, PJTSAU). Inter-cropping <strong>of</strong> short-duration<br />
crop like green-gram (Phaseolus radiates L.), black gram (P. mungo L.) and cluster bean<br />
(Cyamopsis tetragonoloba (L.) Taubert) with castor is remunerative for dry land conditions.<br />
Being a long duration, widely-spaced crop with comparatively thin plant population in<br />
comparison with other field crops, it <strong>of</strong>fers a great scope for using its inter-space by growing<br />
short-duration crop and thereby helps to harvest the potential productivity (Singh and Singh,<br />
1988).<br />
In Gujarat, most <strong>of</strong> the farmers adopt agricultural practices <strong>of</strong> sowing green gram and castor as<br />
an intercrop in the rainfed condition in Kharif season with green gram sowing by seed drill and<br />
then castor sowing manually for maintaining the desired spacing which takes more time as well<br />
energy. The manual method <strong>of</strong> sowing <strong>of</strong> castor is common in India, as well as in all Gujarat<br />
which results in more time requirement and serious backache <strong>of</strong> the farmers. Till now, there is<br />
no such type <strong>of</strong> intercrop planter is developed which can maintain the proper spacing between<br />
the castor and green gram crop simultaneously. To overcome this problem, there is need to<br />
Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment<br />
770 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
design a suitable intercrop planter that is able to perform the above said functions without<br />
damaging the seed and also reduce the cost <strong>of</strong> seeding as well as energy.<br />
Objectives:<br />
1. To design and development <strong>of</strong> intercrop planter for selected crop<br />
2. To evaluate the performance <strong>of</strong> developed intercrop planter<br />
3. To compute the economics <strong>of</strong> intercrop planter.<br />
Methodology<br />
Some agronomical practices <strong>of</strong> selected crops<br />
Crop Variety Seed rate (kg/ha)<br />
Row to row<br />
spacing (mm)<br />
Plant to plant<br />
spacing (mm)<br />
Castor GCH-7 5 1200 600<br />
Green gram GM-4 12-16 450 100<br />
The design considerations followed for mechanical components <strong>of</strong> prototype intercrop planter<br />
are explained under the following headings:<br />
1. Design <strong>of</strong> furrow opener<br />
2. Design <strong>of</strong> frame<br />
3. Design <strong>of</strong> power transmission system<br />
4. Design <strong>of</strong> seed metering mechanism<br />
Specifications <strong>of</strong> intercrop planter<br />
2.1 GENERAL<br />
Type : Tractor mounted<br />
Working width (Spacing × tynes),<br />
mm<br />
: 2600 (Seven tynes adjustable)<br />
Power sources as recommended : 35 hp and above Tractors<br />
Seeds on which test trials were<br />
requested to be conducted<br />
: Castor and green gram<br />
2.2 Seed metering mechanism<br />
Type : Inclined Metering Type<br />
Material : Plastic<br />
Size <strong>of</strong> feed shaft (Length × Dia.),<br />
mm<br />
: 1620 × 20 Φ<br />
Method <strong>of</strong> drive to feed shaft : Chain and sprocket<br />
Method <strong>of</strong> feed rate control :<br />
By changing gear ratio between ground<br />
wheel and metering roller<br />
771 | Page Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
2.3 Overall Dimensions, mm<br />
Dimensions Length Width Height<br />
With covering device 2700 1600 1425<br />
Without covering device 2600 1600 1425<br />
2.4 Mass, kg<br />
Without seed : 270<br />
With seed : 290<br />
2.5 Colour : White, orange and black<br />
Plan <strong>of</strong> experiment for metering device<br />
Independent variables<br />
Sr. No. Variables Levels<br />
1 Inclination <strong>of</strong> seed box 50 and 60 degree<br />
2 Size <strong>of</strong> cells<br />
1. Maximum seed dimension<br />
2. 5 per cent more than maximum seed dimensions<br />
3. 10 per cent more than maximum seed dimensions<br />
4. 20 per cent more than maximum seed dimensions<br />
The field trial was carried out at travel speed 4.5 km/h and with seed metering mechanism to<br />
observe the effect <strong>of</strong> cell size and inclination <strong>of</strong> plate.<br />
Results<br />
The construction <strong>of</strong> the machine was made sturdy and weight was kept matching to the pulling<br />
capacity <strong>of</strong> Tractor above 35hp. The total weight <strong>of</strong> the developed intercrop planter was 270<br />
kg. The unit price <strong>of</strong> developed planter was ₹ 56,500 /-.<br />
Based on the result <strong>of</strong> experiments <strong>of</strong> the study the following conclusions were drawn<br />
1. The intercrop planter was designed on the basis <strong>of</strong> agronomical crop practices and<br />
physical parameters namely length, width, thickness, bulk density, angle <strong>of</strong> repose,<br />
geometric mean diameter <strong>of</strong> castor and green gram.<br />
2. In calibration <strong>of</strong> intercrop planter, the desired seed rate obtained <strong>of</strong> castor and green<br />
gram were 4.73 kg/ha and 13.19 kg/ha at combination <strong>of</strong> 60˚ angle <strong>of</strong> inclination and<br />
13 mm and 6 mm size <strong>of</strong> cells, respectively.<br />
3. The developed intercrop planter was evaluated with castor and green gram in<br />
intercropping. The results shown that combination <strong>of</strong> 60˚ inclination angle and<br />
maximum seed size <strong>of</strong> metering plate was gave better results during the laboratory<br />
evaluation.<br />
4. At consummated combination <strong>of</strong> inclination angle and size <strong>of</strong> cells, the corresponding<br />
dependent variable such as seed rate, average seed spacing, missing index, multiple<br />
index and quality <strong>of</strong> feed index found were 4.73 kg/ha, 60.04 cm, 1.60 per cent, 0.00<br />
Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment<br />
772 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
per cent and 98.40 per cent for castor and 13.19 kg/ha, 9.72 cm, 0.00 per cent, 0.00 per<br />
cent and 98.00 per cent for green gram, respectively during laboratory evaluation.<br />
5. The results shown that combination <strong>of</strong> 60˚ inclination angle and maximum seed size <strong>of</strong><br />
metering plate was gave better results during the field evaluation.<br />
6. At consummated combination <strong>of</strong> inclination angle and size <strong>of</strong> cells, the corresponding<br />
dependent variable such as seed rate, average seed spacing, missing index, multiple<br />
index and quality <strong>of</strong> feed index found were 60.26 cm, 10.40 per cent, 0.00 per cent and<br />
89.60 per cent for castor and 9.95 cm, 8.00 per cent, 0.00 per cent and 92.00 per cent<br />
for green gram, respectively during field evaluation.<br />
7. Depth <strong>of</strong> sowing, speed <strong>of</strong> operation, draft, theoretical capacity, effective capacity, field<br />
efficiency, field machine index and fuel consumption were obtained 5 cm for castor,<br />
3.5 cm for green gram, 4.5 km/h, 233 kgf, 0.90 ha/h, 0.79 ha/h, 84.43 per cent, 87.77<br />
per cent and 3.61 l/h, respectively.<br />
8. Cost <strong>of</strong> operation, breakeven point and payback period <strong>of</strong> intercrop planter were<br />
Conclusions<br />
obtained ₹ 608 per hour (₹ 770 per ha), 18.90 h/annum and 2.06 year, respectively.<br />
Inclination angle <strong>of</strong> metering plate 60˚ and maximum seed size <strong>of</strong> metering plate was giving<br />
better results during the field evaluation. Developed planter saving in time and cost <strong>of</strong> planting<br />
compared with conventional method were 92.25 and 46.15 %, respectively.<br />
References<br />
Pr<strong>of</strong>essor Jayashankar Telangana State Agricultural University, 2021. Agricultural Market<br />
Intelligence Centre, Castor outlook report - July 2021, PJTSAU. p 1.<br />
Singh J. P. and Singh, B. P. 1988. Intercropping <strong>of</strong> mung bean and guar in castor under dryland<br />
condition. Indian J. Agron, 33(2): 177-180.<br />
Kepner R. A, Bainer R. and Barger, E. L. 1987. Principles <strong>of</strong> farm machinery, CBS Publishers<br />
and Distributors, New Delhi. p: 25.<br />
Khurmi R. S. and Gupta, J. K. 2005. A textbook <strong>of</strong> machine design. S. Chand publishing.<br />
Sharma D. N. and Mukesh, S. (2019). Farm machinery design: Principles and problems. Jain<br />
brothers.<br />
Ajit Singh. 2011. Performance evaluation <strong>of</strong> bed planter for intercropping in castor. M.Tech.<br />
(Agril. Engg.). Thesis (Unpublished). CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar,<br />
Haryana.<br />
Ashoka H. G, Jayanthi B. and Prashantha G. M. 2012. Performance evaluation <strong>of</strong> power drawn<br />
six row groundnut planter. Int. J. Agric. Eng., 5(2): 123-126.<br />
773 | Page Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Leaf Propagation <strong>of</strong> Guava for Prevention <strong>of</strong> Root Knot Nematode<br />
R. Neelavathi 1 , C. Indu Rani 2 , M. Kumar 1 and P. Sridhar 1<br />
T5-33P-1417<br />
1 ICAR-Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University Tindivanam, Villupuram district<br />
604002, Tamil Nadu, India<br />
2 Horticultural College and Research Institute, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University Coimbatore 641<br />
003, Tamil Nadu, India<br />
Guava (Psidium guajava L.) is cultivated in an area <strong>of</strong> 2.87 lakh hectares with an annual<br />
production <strong>of</strong> 43.04 lakh tonnes. It is good for diabetic patients due to the very low glycemic<br />
index and glycemic load <strong>of</strong> fruits. It is a highly remunerative crop with good management<br />
practices. Recently, it has been affected by the guava root knot nematode, Meloidogyne<br />
enterolobii (Poornima et al., 2016) in major guava growing states <strong>of</strong> India. The nematode<br />
spreads rapidly and makes the cultivation <strong>of</strong> guava unviable and unpr<strong>of</strong>itable. The major cause<br />
<strong>of</strong> the spread <strong>of</strong> this nematode is through soil along with planting materials. To overcome this,<br />
the production <strong>of</strong> planting materials without nematode infestation through a suitable<br />
propagation method is very essential. The propagation <strong>of</strong> guava through leaves and stem<br />
cutting will be highly useful for producing nematode free planting materials. The present study<br />
was conducted in to standardize concentration <strong>of</strong> Indole Butyric Acid (IBA) and treatment<br />
duration for guava propagation through leaves.<br />
Methodology<br />
The present research work was carried out at ICAR-Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Tamil Nadu<br />
Agricultural University, Tindivanam, Villupuram district, Tamil Nadu during 2021-22. The<br />
experiment was laid out in a Completely Randomized Design with five replications. Just<br />
mature leaves and mature leaves <strong>of</strong> guava cv. Lucknow 49 were collected and dipped in 1,000<br />
and 2,000 ppm <strong>of</strong> Indole Butyric Acid for 1 and 2 minutes. After dipping, the guava leaves<br />
were planted in 50 cavity protrays containing well decomposed cocopeat and kept under shade<br />
net. The number <strong>of</strong> days taken for rooting, rooting percentage, number <strong>of</strong> roots, number <strong>of</strong> days<br />
taken for shoot formation and shoot length were all recorded and subjected to statistical<br />
analysis.<br />
Results<br />
The concentration <strong>of</strong> IBA and treatment duration has significant effects on the number <strong>of</strong> days<br />
for rooting, rooting percentage, number <strong>of</strong> roots, number <strong>of</strong> days taken for shoot formation and<br />
shoot length. Treatment, T 7-Just mature leaves (3 rd leaf from shoot tip) + 2,000 ppm IBA for 1<br />
minute was found to be the best for rooting (37.65days), rooting percentage (81.63%) in guava<br />
leaves followed by T 9- Just mature leaves (3 rd leaf from shoot tip) + 2,000 ppm IBA for 2<br />
minutes. The complete drying <strong>of</strong> the mature leaves was observed in all treatments. Treatment,<br />
Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment<br />
774 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
T7 - Just mature leaves (3 rd leaf from shoot tip) dipped in 2,000 ppm IBA for 1 minute was<br />
found to be the best for and number <strong>of</strong> roots (36.74) on 60 th day. The rooted leaves are<br />
transferred to polybags containing red soil, sand and well decomposed farmyard manure.<br />
Treatment, T7- Just mature leaves (3 rd leaf from shoot tip) + 2,000 ppm IBA for 1 minute was<br />
found to be the best for shooting (67.93days) in guava leaves. The growth <strong>of</strong> the shoot was<br />
better in treatment, T7 (12.77 cm), followed by treatment, T9 (13.22 cm). Treatment, T7-Just<br />
mature leaves (3 rd leaf from shoot tip) + 2,000 ppm IBA for 1 minute (81.22%) was found to<br />
be the best for rooting in guava leaves.<br />
Parameters on rooting and shoot formation in Guava leaves cv. Lucknow 49<br />
Sl.<br />
No<br />
Treatments<br />
Number<br />
<strong>of</strong> days<br />
for<br />
rooting<br />
Rooting<br />
percentage<br />
Number <strong>of</strong><br />
roots/plant<br />
on 60 th day<br />
Days for<br />
shoot<br />
formation<br />
1. T 1 : Just mature leaves - - - - -<br />
2. T 2 : Mature leaves - - - - -<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
7.<br />
8.<br />
9.<br />
10.<br />
Conclusion<br />
T 3 : Just mature leaves +<br />
1,000 ppm IBA for 1 minute<br />
T 4 : Mature leaves + 1,000<br />
ppm IBA for 1 minute<br />
T 5 : Just mature leaves +<br />
1,000 ppm for 2 minutes<br />
T 6 : Mature leaves + 1,000<br />
ppm for 2 minutes<br />
T 7 : Just mature leaves +<br />
2,000 ppm IBA for 1 minute<br />
T 8 : Mature leaves + 2,000<br />
ppm IBA for 1 minute<br />
T 9 : Just mature leaves +<br />
2,000 ppm IBA for 2<br />
minutes<br />
T 10 : Mature leaves + 2,000<br />
ppm IBA for 2 minutes<br />
Shoot<br />
length<br />
(cm)<br />
- - - - -<br />
- - - - -<br />
- - - - -<br />
- - - - -<br />
37.65 81.63 36.74 67.93 13.22<br />
- - - - -<br />
39.67 10.45 38.10 69.69 10.32<br />
- - - - -<br />
Mean 38.66 46.04 37.42 68.81 11.77<br />
CD (0.05) 1.85 10.12 0.16 1.68 0.91<br />
Among treatments evaluated, Treatment, T7 - Just mature leaves (3 rd leaf from shoot tip) +<br />
2,000 ppm IBA for 1 minute was found to be the best for rooting (37.65 days) in guava leaves,<br />
rooting percentage (81.63%), number <strong>of</strong> roots (36.74), number <strong>of</strong> days taken for shoot<br />
formation (67.93). shoot length (13.22cm) and survival (81.22%) <strong>of</strong> leaf propagated plants.<br />
775 | Page Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Leaf propagation will be a novel method <strong>of</strong> propagation to prevent the entry <strong>of</strong> guava root knot<br />
nematode, Meloidogyne enterolobii.<br />
References<br />
Poornima K, Suresh P, Kalaiarasan , Subramanian S. and Ramaraju K. 2016. Root Knot<br />
Nematode, Meloidogyne enterolobii in Guava (Psidium guajava L.) A New Record<br />
from India. Madras Agric. J. 103.<br />
T5-34P-1491<br />
Soil Moisture Indices Using Copernicus Soil Water Index for Drought<br />
Studies<br />
K. V. Rao 1 , G. S. Pratyusha Kranthi 1 , S. Deepika 1 , D. Kalyana Srinivas 1 , V. K. Singh 1 ,<br />
Giriraj Amarnath 2 and A. K. Sikka 2<br />
1 ICAR-Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, Hyderabad<br />
2 International Water Management Institute (IWMI).<br />
Soil moisture is widely recognized as an essential parameter for drought risk assessments as<br />
well as for vegetative stress predictions (Robinson et al., 2008, Dobriyal et al., 2012).<br />
Depletion in soil moisture cause stress in plants and results in crop failure. The deficit soil<br />
moisture volume during crop growing season is a good index <strong>of</strong> agricultural drought intensity,<br />
indicating recent precipitation shortages and limited conditions for crop production (Keyantash<br />
etal., 2002). Many drought indices based on soil moisture have been developed for drought<br />
studies which are very effective in monitoring drought. Indices like the soil moisture index<br />
(SMI) (Sridhar et al., 2008, Hunt et al., 2009) and soil water deficit index (SWDI) (Martnez-<br />
Fernndez et al., 2015) are some agricultural drought indices based on the actual soil moisture<br />
content and known field capacity and wilting point at each location. In this study two indices<br />
were derived using Copernicus soil moisture index (SMI) namely Moisture Condition Index<br />
(MCI) and Soil moisture Index Anomaly (SMA) for drought studies.<br />
Methodology<br />
The Copernicus Global Land Service (CGLS) provides a series <strong>of</strong> bio-geophysical products on<br />
state and evolution <strong>of</strong> Earth's surface on a global scale with 0.1 degree or 12.5km resolution.<br />
Soil Moisture Index (SMI) is estimated in a timely manner and supplemented by long-term<br />
time series. A 10-day soil moisture was downloaded for the period 2000 to 2015. Following<br />
equations are use to calculate MCI and SMA.<br />
MCI =<br />
<br />
<br />
Equation 1<br />
SMA = <br />
<br />
Equation 2<br />
Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment<br />
776 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Where:<br />
SWI = SWI <strong>of</strong> current day<br />
SWI = Maximum <strong>of</strong> average SWI for the period 2000 to 2015<br />
SWI = Minimum <strong>of</strong> average SWI for the period 2000 to 2015<br />
SWI µ = Mean SWI for the period 2000 to 2015<br />
SWI = Standard Deviation <strong>of</strong> SWI for the period 2000 to 2015<br />
Results<br />
MCI and SWA indices (fig) were generated using the formulas mentioned in equation 1,2 and<br />
3 respectively. MCI is classified into extreme, severe, moderate and mild categories. As<br />
mentioned by Copernicus European Drought Observatory, SMA values below -1 and greater<br />
than or equal to -2 represent drier than normal condition, -1 to 1 is normal, above 1 and less or<br />
equal to 2 represent wetter than normal condition. Negative anomalies <strong>of</strong> SMA and extreme,<br />
severe and moderate conditions <strong>of</strong> MCI are associated with drought conditions since soil<br />
moisture content is strongly connected to plant biomass accumulation in many environments<br />
where water availability is the main limiting factor. The MCI and SMA combined with<br />
dryspell, Progressive Difference Normalized Vegetation Index (PDNDVI) <strong>of</strong>fer better<br />
assessment <strong>of</strong> prevailing drought conditions.<br />
Conclusion<br />
Two indices MCI and SMA are developed using SMI <strong>of</strong> Copernicus Global Land Service<br />
which could be used for drought monitoring.<br />
Soil Moisture Index (SMI), Soil Moisture Anomaly (SMA), Moisture Condition Index (MCI) for the<br />
month <strong>of</strong> June 2022<br />
777 | Page Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
References<br />
Copernicus European Drought Observatory (EDO): http://edo.jrc.ec.europa.eu/. European<br />
Commission, 2019.<br />
Dobriyal P, Qureshi A, Badola R and Hussain SA. 2012. A review <strong>of</strong> the methods available<br />
for estimating soil moisture and its implications for water resource management. J.<br />
Hydrol, 458-459: 110-117.<br />
Keyantash J and Dracup JA. 2002. The quantification <strong>of</strong> drought: an evaluation <strong>of</strong> drought<br />
indices. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 83: 1167-1180.<br />
Martinez-Fernandez J, Gonzalez-Zamora A, Sanchez N and Gumuzzio A. 2015. A soil water<br />
based index as a suitable agricultural drought indicator. J. Hydrol., 522: pp. 265-273.<br />
Robinson DA, Campbell CS, Hopmans JW, Hornbuckle BK, Jones SB, Knight R, Ogden F,<br />
Selke J and Wendroth O. 2008. Soil Moisture Measurement for Ecological and<br />
Hydrological Watershed-Scale Observatories: A Review. Vadose zone J., 7(1).<br />
Sridhar V, Hubbard KG, You J, Hunt ED. 2008. Development <strong>of</strong> the Soil Moisture Index to<br />
Quantify Agricultural Drought and Its “User Friendliness” in Severity-Area-Duration<br />
Assessment. J. Hydrometeorol. P<br />
T5-35P-1528<br />
Soil Conservation Practices for Climate Change Adaptation in Bihar State<br />
Pooja Jena 1 Manoher Saryam 2 , Shailabala Dei 1 , and Arabind Kumar Sinha 3<br />
1 Bihar Agricultural University, Sabour (Bihar)<br />
2 Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi (Uttar Pradesh)<br />
3 Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Bhagalpur (Bihar)<br />
Agriculture places a heavy burden on the land and environment in the process <strong>of</strong> providing<br />
food for man, and climate factors in agricultural production is having its toll on soil fertility in<br />
Bihar state. Soil conservation technique is the application <strong>of</strong> processes to the solution <strong>of</strong> soil<br />
management problems. The conservation <strong>of</strong> soil implies utilization without waste so as to make<br />
possible a continuously high level <strong>of</strong> crop production while improving environmental quality.<br />
Soil conversation, in practice refers to the protection <strong>of</strong> all surface deposits, not merely the<br />
near-surface, organic layers that are subject to present-day weathering. Climate change is<br />
occurring, and the implementation <strong>of</strong> sound conservation practices will be key for each<br />
country’s health, social stability, and security. There are a large number <strong>of</strong> peer-reviewed<br />
publications that report on the effects <strong>of</strong> a changing climate. The potential role <strong>of</strong> conservation<br />
practices in contributing to food security, illustrates the relationship between climate change,<br />
soil and water resources, and food security. The common climate adaptation strategies among<br />
Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment<br />
778 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
the farmers were mulching, green and farmyard manuring, cover crops and mixed cropping,<br />
which have direct effect on soil nutrient. Other strategies to mitigate the effect <strong>of</strong> flooding such<br />
as terracing and contouring were seldom used. Farmers’ opinion towards climate adaptation<br />
strategies is that no significant yield increase was achieved, and the techniques were not costeffective.<br />
Also, the techniques require technical know-how, which they lacked. Major<br />
constraints to farmers’ use <strong>of</strong> the climate adaptation strategies were pressure on land, lack <strong>of</strong><br />
knowledge on soil conservation techniques, inadequate information and education on use <strong>of</strong><br />
soil conservation techniques and insecure land tenure system. Trainings should be organized<br />
for the farmers to educate and inform them about environment friendly soil conservation<br />
practices that will improve and increase their yield thereby improving their income.<br />
T5-36P-1535<br />
Correlation <strong>of</strong> Weather Variables on the Development <strong>of</strong> Makhana Leaf<br />
Spot Disease in the Koshi Region <strong>of</strong> Bihar<br />
Md. Nadeem Akhtar 1 *, Santosh Kumar 2 , Krishna Murari Singh 3 and<br />
Amrendra Kumar 4<br />
1,3 Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Agwanpur, Saharsa, Bihar.<br />
2 Mandan Bharti Agricultural College, Agwanpur, Saharsa -852 201, Bihar<br />
4 Agricultural Technology Application Research Institute, Patna (Zone IV), Bihar<br />
Makhana (Euryale ferox salisb) a member <strong>of</strong> the family Nymphaeaceae, is an emergent floating<br />
macrophyte plant, which is cultivated commercially as a cash crop. It is also known as fox nut,<br />
gorgon nut, and food <strong>of</strong> God. The center for makhana cultivation lies in the tropical and<br />
subtropical regions <strong>of</strong> South East and East Asia. In India, North Bihar, the lower Assam region,<br />
Odisha, West Bengal, Meghalaya, Jammu & Kashmir, and Manipur are some <strong>of</strong> the states<br />
where the makhana is cultivated (Kumar et al., 2011). However, North Bihar is well-known<br />
for makhana production not only at the national level but also at the global level. The area<br />
comprises about 20,000 ha, which covers about 80% <strong>of</strong> the acreage and production <strong>of</strong> more<br />
than 90% (Jana, 2016). Makhana is affected by various kinds <strong>of</strong> diseases caused by fungi. Leaf<br />
spot caused by Alternaria tenuissima is one <strong>of</strong> the most catastrophic and widespread diseases<br />
which causes substantial yield loss (Kumar et al., 2020). Severe foliage infections were<br />
observed in makhana <strong>of</strong> the Koshi zone <strong>of</strong> Bihar, while the survey and surveillance program<br />
during crop season, 2018, where, 25–30% <strong>of</strong> leaf areas in one-fourth population <strong>of</strong> makhana in<br />
most <strong>of</strong> the ponds were infected (Kumar et al., 2020). Since weather factors have an overriding<br />
influence on crop stage and the progress <strong>of</strong> the disease. Therefore, monitoring <strong>of</strong> weather<br />
conditions <strong>of</strong> different crop stages is an important concern in disease management and<br />
prediction. Moreover, rare information is available related to the epidemiology <strong>of</strong> this disease.<br />
Therefore, considering the devastation <strong>of</strong> makhana due to leaf spot, an experiment was<br />
779 | Page Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
formulated and conducted to assess the relationship between the occurrence & progress <strong>of</strong> this<br />
disease under prevailing weather variables in the Koshi zone <strong>of</strong> Bihar.<br />
The impact <strong>of</strong> weather variables viz., temperature, humidity, and rainfall on the development<br />
<strong>of</strong> leaf spot disease in makhana in the Koshi Zone <strong>of</strong> Bihar has taken under investigation, while<br />
the crop season (March-August) 2020 and 2021. The studies revealed that the maximum leaf<br />
spot severity occurred in mid-July, 2020 and 2021, which was 16.75% and 17.67%<br />
respectively. However, it was minimum during April 2020 and 2021. The disease severity<br />
reached its plateau when the respective mean temperature and RH were 32.7 o C & 85.5% in<br />
June-August 2019. Similar trends <strong>of</strong> the plateau were seen in June-August 2021 when the<br />
respective mean temperature and RH were 35.2 o C & 86.9%. The respective average rainfall<br />
recorded in 2020 and 2021 favoring the maximum severity were 138.5 and 148.0 mm. The<br />
correlation <strong>of</strong> leaf spot severity with weather variables was strongly positive, which was 0.983<br />
with the mean temperature, 0.965 with the mean relative humidity, and 0.959 with rainfall at a<br />
1% level <strong>of</strong> significance. Regression analysis also supported the mentioned value <strong>of</strong> weather<br />
variables as an optimum value responsible for leaf spot disease.<br />
T5-37P-1538<br />
Study the Effect <strong>of</strong> Different Chemical on Biochemical and Functional<br />
Properties <strong>of</strong> Custard Apple (Annona squamosa L.) During Storage<br />
Indraraj Ghasil 1 , N. K. Meena 2 , J. K. Balyan 1 and Hitesh Muwal 1<br />
1 Dryland Farming research Station, Arjia, Bhilwara (MPUAT, Udaipur)<br />
2 Department <strong>of</strong> Fruit Science, Agriculture University, Kota, Rajasthan<br />
Custard apple (Annona squamosa L.) is a delicious fruit cultivated in tropical and sub-tropical<br />
climate. it belongs to family Annonaceae and native <strong>of</strong> the West Indies. Custard apple is an<br />
arid fruit crop and hardy in nature requires dry climate with mild winter. It can grow from sea<br />
level up to 100 m above the mean sea level elevation and also drought (Singh, 1992). The<br />
ripened fruits are consumed mainly in fresh form. There has been great demand for custard<br />
apple in preparation <strong>of</strong> ice-cream and pudding. Custard apple contains, protein (1.6 g), fat (0.5-<br />
0.6 g), carbohydrates (23.5g), crude fiber (0.9-6.6 g), calcium (17.6 mg), phosphorus (47 mg),<br />
iron (1.5 mg), thiamine (0.075-0.119 mg), rib<strong>of</strong>lavin (0.086-0.175 mg), ascorbic Acid (15.0 -<br />
44.4 mg), nicotinic Acid (0.5 mg), per 100 g <strong>of</strong> edible portion <strong>of</strong> custard apple. Custard apple<br />
is highly climacteric fruit. It ripens within 2-3 days after harvesting at commercial maturity<br />
stage. It steadily produces ethylene in large amount and owing to that the shelf life <strong>of</strong> fruits is<br />
very poor. At room temperature fruits remain fit for consumption only for 3-4 days after that<br />
decay starts. Its pulp is also containing high amount <strong>of</strong> phenolics, there<strong>of</strong> it become prone to<br />
oxidation during air contact. Post-harvest application <strong>of</strong> oxalic acid (OA), salicylic acid (SA)<br />
and sodium nitroprusside (SNP) could be a better solution to enhance the quality and storage<br />
Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment<br />
780 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
life <strong>of</strong> custard apple. Oxalic acid reduces the production <strong>of</strong> polygalacturonase (PG) and pectin<br />
methyl esterase (PME), which will be responsible for cell wall degradation, so that the treated<br />
fruit maintains the firmness (Wu et al., 2011). Salicylic acid is an endogenous plant hormone<br />
which plays an important role in enhancing fruit quality and positively effects on reducing<br />
respiration and ethylene biosynthesis rates, weight loss, decay and s<strong>of</strong>tening <strong>of</strong> the fruits<br />
(Shafiee et al., 2010). Sodium nitroprusside (SNP) can release nitric oxide (NO) by reduction<br />
and decomposition. Since Nitrous Oxide decreases ethylene synthesis, during ripening and fruit<br />
senescence. Application <strong>of</strong> these eco-friendly chemicals explored in many fruits but remains<br />
unexplored in custard apple. There is urgent need to develop low cost and eco-friendly<br />
approaches.<br />
Methodology<br />
The mature, freshly harvested, uniform size and quality fruits <strong>of</strong> custard apple cv. “Balanagar’’<br />
free from insect pest and microbial infection procured from the experimental orchard <strong>of</strong> AICRP<br />
on AZF, College <strong>of</strong> Horticulture and Forestry, Jhalawar and to the laboratory <strong>of</strong> Department<br />
<strong>of</strong> Post-Harvest Technology, College <strong>of</strong> Horticulture and Forestry, Jhalawar (Rajasthan). After<br />
preliminary sorting, the fruits were washed thoroughly in tap water to remove the dirt and dust<br />
from the surface <strong>of</strong> fruit and then fruits were dried in the air. The whole lots <strong>of</strong> fruits were<br />
being randomly divided into 13 lots and each lots containing 20 fruits were given following<br />
postharvest treatments (Oxalic acid @ 2.5 mM, 5.0 mM, 7.5 mM, 10.0 Mm, Salicylic acid @<br />
0.5 mM, 1.0 mM, 1.5 mM, 2.0 mM, Sodium Nitro Prusside@ 0.5 mM, 1.0 mM, 1.5 mM, 2.0<br />
mM) by dipping the fruits in respective chemical solution for 10 minutes followed by air<br />
drying. These fruits were kept in aerated corrugated boxes. The data collected as a part <strong>of</strong><br />
experiment will be analyzed by following analytical method as followed for Completely<br />
Randomized Design (CRD).<br />
Results<br />
TSS was significantly affected by different post-harvest treatments during entire storage<br />
period. On 9 th day <strong>of</strong> storage maximum increment in TSS (38.87°Brix) was observed in<br />
treatment T12 (Sodium Nitro Prusside @ 2.0 mM ) and lowest (25.61°Brix) in treatment T0<br />
(Control). T 12 treatment was found superior over all other treatments. A sharp drop was<br />
witnessed in titratable acidity <strong>of</strong> all fruits during whole storage period although on 9 th day <strong>of</strong><br />
storage maximum decrease in titratable acidity was perceived in fruits treatments with Salicylic<br />
acid @ 2.0 mM) (57.81%) and Oxalic acid @ 5.0 mM (57.81%) and lowest with Salicylic<br />
acid @ 1.0 mM (23.68%). It is apparent from the data revealed that different post-harvest<br />
treatments significantly influenced the total sugar during entire storage period <strong>of</strong> custard apple<br />
fruits. Application <strong>of</strong> Sodium Nitro Prusside @ 2.0 mM recorded maximum increment<br />
(70.26%) <strong>of</strong> total sugar and minimum increment (26.26%) was recorded under control on 9 th<br />
day <strong>of</strong> storage. Further, Sodium Nitro Prusside @ 2.0 mM was found significantly better among<br />
781 | Page Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
rest <strong>of</strong> the treatments. The total phenols content was significantly affected by different<br />
treatments during entire storage period. The minimum reduction (11.62%) in total phenols<br />
content was found that Sodium Nitro Prusside @ 2.0 mM), while it was maximum (21.94%)<br />
in fruits under control (on 9 th day <strong>of</strong> storage). Coating with Sodium Nitro Prusside @ 2.0 mM)<br />
was found significantly at par with Salicylic acid @ 1.5 mM (11.81%). The antioxidant activity<br />
was significantly affected by different treatments during entire storage period. The minimum<br />
reduction (34.75%) in antioxidant activity was found with Sodium Nitro Prusside @ 2.0 mM,<br />
while it was maximum (85.71%) in fruits under control (on 9 th day <strong>of</strong> storage). However,<br />
Sodium Nitro Prusside @ 2.0 mM was found superior over all other treatments. Similar<br />
findings were also observed by Ghasil, et.al. (2022)<br />
Conclusion<br />
On the basis <strong>of</strong> results obtained in the present research experiment, it may be concluded that<br />
coating with Sodium Nitro Prusside @ 2.0 mM was found significantly superior over all other<br />
treatments and it also observed in maintaining the quality and extending the shelf life <strong>of</strong><br />
Balanagar custard apple fruits. Further, under this treatment recorded highest TSS<br />
(38.87°Brix), maximum increment <strong>of</strong> total sugar (70.26%), highest ascorbic acid (43.20<br />
mg/100g), minimum reduction <strong>of</strong> phenol content (11.62%) and highest antioxidant capacity<br />
(0.92 μmol Trolox/100 g) end <strong>of</strong> the storage period. However, Sodium Nitro Prusside @ 2.0<br />
mM) was found best for maintaining biochemical and functional activities and increased the<br />
shelf life up to 8 days <strong>of</strong> storage at room temperature.<br />
References<br />
Ghasil.I. .2011. Effect <strong>of</strong> post-harvest treatments on biochemical and bioactive compounds <strong>of</strong><br />
Custard Apple (Annona squanosa L) Cv. Int. J. Fruit Sci., 22(1):826-836.<br />
Shafiee M, Taghavi T.S. and Babalar M. 2010. Addition <strong>of</strong> salicylic acid to nutrient solution<br />
combined with postharvest treatments (hot water, salicylic acid, and calcium dipping)<br />
improved postharvest fruit quality <strong>of</strong> strawberry. Scientia Horticulturae, 124(1):40–45.<br />
Singh S.P. 1992. Fruit crops for wastelands. Scientific Publishers, New Pali Road, Jodhpur-<br />
342001, India. pp 49-64.<br />
Wu F, Zhang D, Zhang H, Jiang G, Su X. and Qu, H. 2011. Physiological and biochemical<br />
response <strong>of</strong> harvested plum fruit to oxalic acid during ripening or shelf-life. Food Res.<br />
Int., 44: 1299-1305.<br />
Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment<br />
782 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
T5-38P-1589<br />
Cloud Computing, Data science for Big Data Management in Agriculture<br />
R. Lakshmi Sreya<br />
Maturi Venkata Subba Rao (MVSR) Engineering College, Hyderabad, India<br />
Farm productivity and farmer income in India is plagued with several challenges – marginal<br />
land holdings <strong>of</strong> farmers making mechanization difficult and implementation <strong>of</strong> technology<br />
difficult or unviable, timely access to genuine and high-quality inputs and farming advice,<br />
heavily intermediated supply chains, dependence on monsoon rains, and inadequate storage<br />
facilities. Cloud computing technology in agricultural area has greater scope in the overall<br />
development <strong>of</strong> India. This paper reviews the potential uses <strong>of</strong> cloud computing in agriculture.<br />
Methodology<br />
This paper is based on literature review <strong>of</strong> application <strong>of</strong> data science tools in making<br />
agriculture more competitive and efficient.<br />
Results<br />
Data science is the method <strong>of</strong> gleaning insights from data. It enables the use <strong>of</strong> real-time data<br />
and past data to form meaningful insights on buyer behavior, customer credit behavior, product<br />
testing, cropping patterns, and others. Data science already plays a significant role in banking<br />
and healthcare, both in India and globally. The principles <strong>of</strong> data science could also be applied<br />
to the Indian agriculture industry across the value chain from the farm through retail.<br />
Agriculture and cloud computing cloud services:<br />
a) Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS):<br />
Infrastructure as a Service abbreviated as IaaS, contains the basic building blocks for cloud IT<br />
and typically provide access to networking features, computers (virtual or on dedicated<br />
hardware), and data storage space. Infrastructure as a Service provides you with the highest<br />
level <strong>of</strong> flexibility and management control over your IT resources and is most similar to<br />
existing IT resources that many IT departments and developers are familiar with today.<br />
b) Platform as a Service (PaaS):<br />
Platforms as a service remove the need for organizations to manage the underlying<br />
infrastructure (usually hardware and operating systems) and allow you to focus on the<br />
deployment and management <strong>of</strong> your applications. This helps you to be more efficient as you<br />
don’t need to worry about resource procurement, capacity planning, s<strong>of</strong>tware maintenance,<br />
patching, or any <strong>of</strong> the other undifferentiated heavy lifting involved in running your<br />
application.<br />
783 | Page Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
c) S<strong>of</strong>tware as a Service (SaaS):<br />
S<strong>of</strong>tware as a Service provides you with a completed product that is run and managed by the<br />
service provider. In most cases, people referring to S<strong>of</strong>tware as a Service are referring to enduser<br />
applications. With a SaaS <strong>of</strong>fering you do not have to think about how the service is<br />
maintained or how the underlying infrastructure is managed; you only need to think about<br />
how you will use that particular piece s<strong>of</strong>tware. A common example <strong>of</strong> a SaaS application is<br />
web-based email where you can send and receive email without having to manage feature<br />
additions to the email product or maintaining the servers and operating systems that the email<br />
program is running on.<br />
The relationship between Cloud computing and agricultural development is seen as<br />
applications.<br />
The applications <strong>of</strong> cloud computing technology in agriculture can solve the bottleneck<br />
problem <strong>of</strong> agricultural modernization and agricultural information and can also break<br />
agricultural producers’ limitations in knowledge or technology, reduce duplication, improve<br />
utilization <strong>of</strong> existing resources to make up for dispersed, small-scale, regional differences<br />
agricultural production and the strong dependence on the natural climate vulnerability <strong>of</strong><br />
agricultural production.<br />
Organizational form <strong>of</strong> production in agriculture is relatively simple, backward and a low<br />
degree <strong>of</strong> specialization <strong>of</strong> agricultural production areas, it is difficult to achieve integrating<br />
agriculture.<br />
In addition, due to the limitations <strong>of</strong> the farmers at market forecasting, business decisionmaking,<br />
information gathering, and logistics management capacity is more lacking; it <strong>of</strong>ten<br />
leads to a mismatch between the supply and demand, not only damages the farmers' own<br />
interests, have also hindered the healthy development <strong>of</strong> the market supply and demand.<br />
Conclusion:<br />
This prominent technique may deliver the agriculture-based knowledge along with<br />
management <strong>of</strong> natural resources and knowledge directly to the consumers not only in a small<br />
region like in nonstop marketing or shops but also in a wider region. This will change the<br />
whole supply chain, which is mainly in the hand <strong>of</strong> large companies, now, but can change to<br />
a more direct, shorter chain between producers and consumers. Cloud computing technology,<br />
applicable for the improvement <strong>of</strong> agriculture growth, food, grain, product, economic<br />
condition, ensure food safety, GDP <strong>of</strong> the nation & circulate information related to agriculture.<br />
Now, much more than in the past, agriculture pr<strong>of</strong>essionals can dig into data and use it to<br />
make highly informed decisions. The advancements <strong>of</strong> data scientists are making this reality<br />
possible, both now and for the foreseeable future.<br />
Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment<br />
784 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
References<br />
Patel R. and Patel, M. 2013. Application <strong>of</strong> Cloud Computing in Agricultural Development <strong>of</strong><br />
Rural India. International Journal <strong>of</strong> Computer Science and Information Technologies.<br />
4(6): 922-926.<br />
Kamath, S. and Chetan A. A. 2011. Affordable, interactive crowd sourcing platform for<br />
sustainable agriculture: Enabling public private partnerships. Cloud Computing<br />
Journal, April 2011.<br />
Patel, R. and Patel M. 2013. Application <strong>of</strong> Cloud Computing in Agricultural Development <strong>of</strong><br />
Rural India. Int. J. Comput. Sci. Inf. Technol., 4(6): 922-926.<br />
Hori M, Kawashima E. and Yamazaki T. (2010) "Application <strong>of</strong> cloud computing to agriculture<br />
and prospects in other fields", Fujitsu Science and Technology Journal, Vol.46, No.4,<br />
pp.446–454.<br />
Jianxun Zhang, Zhimin Gu, and Chao Zheng, " A Summary <strong>of</strong> Research Progress on Cloud<br />
Computing", Application Research <strong>of</strong> Computers, Vol. 27, No. 2, 2010, 429-433.<br />
T5-39P-1598<br />
Feasibility <strong>of</strong> Appropriate Mechanization in Cultivation <strong>of</strong> Millets in Rainfed Eco System<br />
I. Srinivas, Ashish S Dhimate, R. V. Adake. G. Pratibha, G. Venkatesh and<br />
K. Sammi Reddy and M. Srinivasa Rao<br />
ICAR-Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, Hyderabad, India-500059<br />
Millets have become important food grains in our life and were considered as low starch<br />
content grains for healthy diet. Total area under millets (excluding Jawar and Bajra) is about<br />
1.6 million ha and producing about 2.35 million tons <strong>of</strong> millets (2020-21) with average grain<br />
yield <strong>of</strong> 1.46 tons/ha apart from producing considerable amount <strong>of</strong> biomass for fodder needs<br />
<strong>of</strong> animals. It was observed that 89 % <strong>of</strong> the millets are produced from the rainfed eco system<br />
only. These are produced from the small and marginal lands owned by the small to medium<br />
farmers who don’t have enough resources. Apart from that, the scarcity <strong>of</strong> labour during the<br />
peak operations is a major hurdle for proper management <strong>of</strong> millet production system.<br />
Availability <strong>of</strong> suitable implements for sowing and inter cultivation are key issues for meeting<br />
the timeliness <strong>of</strong> the required operations. Keeping all these point in consideration performance<br />
evaluation <strong>of</strong> CRIDA 6 row planter and zero till planter carried out at CRIDA research farm<br />
with modified inclined metering plate. Appropriate mechanization in intercultural operations<br />
like weeding and spraying helped in increasing the productivity <strong>of</strong> the millets apart from<br />
reducing the cultivation cost significantly.<br />
785 | Page Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Methodology<br />
Most <strong>of</strong> farmers from dryland own 35 hp tractor. To suit their power availability six row planter<br />
was developed. The design consists <strong>of</strong> hopper box for seed and fertilizer, drive mechanism,<br />
mounting frame, seed tubes and metering plates. Row to row spacing can be maintained by<br />
adjusting the shanks on the frame as per the recommended spacing. It provides effective soil<br />
covering, uniform seed to seed distance, faster coverage. Moreover, mechanical sowing<br />
increased crop yield and pr<strong>of</strong>it, time saving by 80 % and labour saving, 30 % saving in seed<br />
and fertilizer when compared to the conventional. The modified inclined metering plates to<br />
accommodate the smaller size seeds ranging 1 to 3 mm size with 2 to 3 mm length optimized<br />
the required seed dropping for better germination with recommended plant-to-plant spacing.<br />
The depth <strong>of</strong> sowing was also observed to be very critical parameter for the alfisol soils with<br />
proper coverage.<br />
Specification <strong>of</strong> tractor drawn CRIDA six row planter<br />
S. no. Particulars Specification<br />
1. Overall Dimension (L*W*H) 2121 x 640 x 980 mm<br />
2. Metering mechanism Inclined plate<br />
3. Source <strong>of</strong> power 35-45hp<br />
4. Type <strong>of</strong> Seed Multi-crop planter, metering plates available as per<br />
seed type<br />
5. Furrow opener Shovel type furrow openers<br />
6. Furrow spacing Adjustable<br />
7. Depth <strong>of</strong> sowing adjustable<br />
8. Weight <strong>of</strong> machine 275 kg<br />
Results<br />
Appropriate mechanization <strong>of</strong> sowing with CRIDA 6-row planter and CRIDA Zero till planter<br />
helped in increase in yields by 20 to 30 % in Sorghum, Finger millet, Pearl millet and Foxtail<br />
millets. A tractor drawn weeder was used to remove the weeds with proper earthing up<br />
operation gave good anchoring to the plants apart from making better aeration and nutrient<br />
availability to the plants. The 8 “width rear wheels for the tractor made the weeding easy with<br />
less or no damage to the plants. It was also observed that the modified row spacing <strong>of</strong> 40 to 45<br />
cm helped in better tractor drawn weeding and spraying operations which helped in reducing<br />
cost <strong>of</strong> operation and also significant amount <strong>of</strong> drudgery. Overall, it was observed that, the<br />
partial mechanization in millet production system reduced the cost <strong>of</strong> cultivation by 30 to 40<br />
% and increased the yields.<br />
Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment<br />
786 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
T5-40P-1711<br />
Small Scale Farm Mechanization: An Archangle to Climate Resilient<br />
Agriculture<br />
M. V. Tiwari, V. K. Poshia, and P. D. Verma<br />
KVK, Navsari Agricultural University, Dediapda, Gujarat<br />
In rural India, the percentage <strong>of</strong> women who depend on agriculture for their livelihood is as<br />
high as 84%. Women make up about 33% <strong>of</strong> cultivators and about 47% percent <strong>of</strong> agricultural<br />
labourers. Women Farmers are those who work in acres, not in hours, they don’t work till the<br />
sun gets down, but they surely work till the job gets done. Agricultural machines and equipment<br />
are mostly made by male mechanics. Adjustment is <strong>of</strong>ten needed to make it suitable for women<br />
farmers due to their body size, physical strength and limited experiences <strong>of</strong> using them.<br />
Women do the most tedious and back-breaking tasks in agriculture, animal husbandry and at<br />
homes. Their contribution is very high in farm sector as they are involved in most <strong>of</strong> the farm<br />
operations and are, therefore, subjected to extra harsh conditions <strong>of</strong> work that lead to drudgery.<br />
It is generally felt that the available agricultural machineries are not women friendly as they<br />
are not designed taking into consideration the women’s ergonomic measurements. There exists<br />
a gap between design engineers and farm planners and the lack <strong>of</strong> women’s access to articulate<br />
their felt needs. The result is that the women farmers must carry out various field operations<br />
with the age-old hand tools or with their hands. The posture adopted during these operations<br />
are not proper and lead to occupational health problems if not given due attention. It is thus<br />
essential that the tools and implements for farm women are developed to suit their body<br />
posture. In this direction, several agricultural implements and hand tools suitable for farm<br />
women have been developed by various Institutes under ICAR. These gender-friendly tools are<br />
required to be promoted and popularized among the farm women on a massive scale and these<br />
tools are- Twin wheel hoe, paddy thresher, stalk puller, Milking stand& stool and so many with<br />
the help <strong>of</strong> these tools they save their time, improve work efficiency and prove as a source <strong>of</strong><br />
income. The Central government is continuously working to strengthen the financial security<br />
<strong>of</strong> farmers. Therefore, the government has released funds to different states for various<br />
activities <strong>of</strong> farm mechanization. These include the establishment <strong>of</strong> custom hiring centers,<br />
farm machinery banks, high-tech hubs and distribution <strong>of</strong> various agricultural machinery.<br />
Methodology<br />
A lot <strong>of</strong> improved machines are promoted for different agriculture operations in the country,<br />
but all the machines are not suited to hilly geography <strong>of</strong> Narmada district. After all assessments,<br />
some <strong>of</strong> the improved machines are described below which can be opted for this region in terms<br />
<strong>of</strong> work efficiency improvement, KVK (Narmada, NAU) has taken one step ahead developed<br />
a concept on reach tool center at village level with in 7 villages with set <strong>of</strong> 7 tools like as- 1.<br />
787 | Page Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Twin wheel hoe, 2. Rack 3. De-Topping 4. Winnowing fan 5. Paddy thresher 6. stalk puller 7.<br />
Spiral grader. These tools are helpful to save time, save money, save land, manage their health,<br />
more efficient, effective and environmentally friendly. On reach tool center can be a boon for<br />
small farmers & farming community and helps them cope up with the shortage <strong>of</strong> labor and<br />
improve farm efficiency in terms <strong>of</strong> 70 to 80%.<br />
Possible Interventions:<br />
Weeding equipment/tools: Hand weeding has traditionally been the most common weed<br />
management practice in Narmada. However, because <strong>of</strong> rising labor scarcity at critical time <strong>of</strong><br />
weed control, hand weeding is either delayed or insufficient, exacerbating losses. The<br />
introduction <strong>of</strong> new, effective and cheaper molecules has <strong>of</strong>fered the farmers adoption <strong>of</strong><br />
herbicide-based weed control, which is likely to increase in future. Battery-operated sprayer<br />
fitted with 3-nozzle boom is an option that can increase herbicide use efficiency. Much more<br />
uniform coverage is obtained from using a multiple-nozzle boom sprayer than a single nozzle.<br />
Mechanical weeding can also be opted as an appropriate weed control measure. Therefore,<br />
Twin wheel hoe weeder operating between a row spacing <strong>of</strong> 25-30 cm, and taking 7-8 hours<br />
for weeding one-hectare area, can be recommended.<br />
Paddy thresher: Now-a-days motor operated paddy thresher used in Narmada district. Grains<br />
are generally separated out with the combining and hammering actions <strong>of</strong> threshing teeth.<br />
Now the motor operated paddy threshers are available in improved versions and also available<br />
with the diesel engines having an additional winnowing fan. This type <strong>of</strong> machine is safer,<br />
women-friendly, more efficient which can solve the problems <strong>of</strong> labour, time and cost. Use<br />
<strong>of</strong> this machine for custom hiring can be an alternate source <strong>of</strong> earning for increasing their<br />
family income.<br />
Stalk puller: In Narmada district main farmers growing crops like pigeon pea & cotton. Stalk<br />
<strong>of</strong> these plants is not easy to pull out. The plant stalk puller is very convenient and efficient<br />
hand tool for pulling out the stalk with roots by the help <strong>of</strong> long ever handle.<br />
Conclusion<br />
The dominance <strong>of</strong> small and marginal holdings in Narmada district farmers major focus on<br />
development and designing <strong>of</strong> scale-neutral machinery suited to different geographical<br />
terrains. Facilitating the farmers and train them on above-said machines will help in their<br />
adoption at large scale and make a viable economic case for new mechanized sustainable<br />
intensification (SI) technologies in farming sector . The day-to-day hiring <strong>of</strong> machines on a<br />
rental basis would be a better option for small and marginal farmers <strong>of</strong> Narmada district.<br />
Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment<br />
788 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
T5-41P-1616<br />
Predicting the Generation Index <strong>of</strong> Groundnut Bruchid, Caryedon Serratus<br />
Olivier in India during Future Climate CHANGE scenario<br />
T.V. Prasad *, M. Srinivasa Rao, Y. Muttapa, G. Navya and V.K. Singh<br />
ICAR-Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture (CRIDA), Hyderabad-500 059, India<br />
*tvprasad72@gmail.com<br />
Groundnut bruchid, Caryedon serratus Olivier (Bruchidae: Coleoptera) is a primary insect pest<br />
<strong>of</strong> groundnut in storage causing both quantitative and qualitative losses. Beetle damage not<br />
only reduces the weight, nutritive value and affects the quality <strong>of</strong> seed and oil. Extent <strong>of</strong> damage<br />
(weight loss) caused by bruchid in shelled and unshelled groundnut is about 70 and 80 per cent,<br />
respectively (Sreedhar et al., 2020). To develop any pest management programme for a specific<br />
agro-ecosystem, information on abundance and distribution <strong>of</strong> pest in relation to weather<br />
parameters is a basic requirement. The ability <strong>of</strong> an insect to develop at different temperatures<br />
is an important adaptation to survive in various climatic conditions, and its understanding is<br />
important for predicting pest outbreaks. The pest forecasting models facilitate better<br />
preparedness to combat outbreaks <strong>of</strong> serious insect pests by developing effective pest<br />
management strategies well in advance. The Insect Life Cycle Modelling (ILCYM) s<strong>of</strong>tware<br />
(version 3.0) developed by the International Potato Centre, (Tonnang et al., 2013) has been<br />
used to predict climatically suitable areas for distribution, abundance and damage activity, and<br />
to examine the impact <strong>of</strong> climate change on future pest status <strong>of</strong> insects <strong>of</strong> economically<br />
important crops. With this background we aimed to study the generation index <strong>of</strong> C. serratus,<br />
to predict its number <strong>of</strong> generations per year in different agroecological regions <strong>of</strong> India due to<br />
future changes temperature conditions and further simulation data generated from ILCYM<br />
s<strong>of</strong>tware were adopted for development <strong>of</strong> future pest risk maps using ArcGIS environment.<br />
Methodology<br />
Experiments on life tables were conducted at six constant temperatures (15, 20, 25, 27, 30 and<br />
35 o C) and on fluctuating temperature environment inside the growth chambers and the data<br />
obtained from these experiments was used to develop temperature-dependent phenology model<br />
for C. serratus. Third module <strong>of</strong> ILCYM “potential population analysis and mapping” was<br />
used for developing pest risk maps. Using simulated life table parameters and climatic data<br />
(temperature), we projected generation index (GI) <strong>of</strong> C. serratus for present and future time<br />
period (year 2050). The generated ASCII files <strong>of</strong> GI from ILCYM for present and future<br />
predictions were imported in to ArcGIS and converted into a polygon-based classified georeferenced<br />
data set under different risk levels <strong>of</strong> C. serratus in India. The GI (value ranges from<br />
1 to 3.45) used for identification <strong>of</strong> the region where insect pest having number <strong>of</strong> generations<br />
789 | Page Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
per year. More details about ILCYM and computation <strong>of</strong> various risk indices including GI are<br />
available in Prasad et al., 2021.<br />
Results<br />
The total number <strong>of</strong> generations that can be completed by C. serratus in a year in India was<br />
visualized using ArcGIS for current (baseline worldclim climate data for the year 2000) and<br />
future projections based on the ensemble <strong>of</strong> eight GCMs (year 2050) (Fig. 1). The generation<br />
indices are directly correlated with the abundance and potential infestation <strong>of</strong> C. serratus under<br />
stored conditions. Ensemble model has predicted 3-3.46 generations <strong>of</strong> C. serratus in a year in<br />
a major part <strong>of</strong> India. The Himalayan region area and its ranges from north to north-eastern<br />
regions are predicted to have 1-2.14 generations in a year under current climatic conditions.<br />
Under future climate change scenarios (2050), maximum regions <strong>of</strong> India, except Northern<br />
Himalayan and top <strong>of</strong> north-eastern states, are predicted with more than three generations <strong>of</strong><br />
C. serratus in a year. In the present study, the model outputs represent only the potential<br />
population growth parameters for C. serratus in a given agro-ecological region. Thus, it needs<br />
to be cautiously interpreted while predicting stored dynamics and abundance <strong>of</strong> C. serratus<br />
population, where abiotic and biotic factors other than temperature do come to play the role in<br />
regulating pest population dynamics. The present results indicate that temperature is vital in<br />
influencing the growth and life table parameters <strong>of</strong> C. serratus and this pest incidence is likely<br />
to be higher in the future climate change periods in India.<br />
Change in generation index (GI) <strong>of</strong> C. serratus in India for (a) Present and (b) Future (2050).<br />
Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment<br />
790 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Conclusion<br />
Based on present results the number <strong>of</strong> generations that can be completed by C. serratus in a<br />
year in India is likely to be higher in the future climate change periods.<br />
References<br />
Prasad, T. V., Srinivasa Rao, M., Rao, K. V., Bal, S. K., Muttapa, Y., Choudhary, J. S. and<br />
Singh, V. K. 2021. Temperature-based phenology model for predicting the present<br />
and future establishment and distribution <strong>of</strong> recently invasive Spodoptera frugiperda<br />
(J. E. Smith) in India. Bulletin <strong>of</strong> Entomological Research, 1-15.<br />
Sreedhar, M., Singh, D. V., Reddy, D. C. and Vasudha, A. 2020. Biochemical changes in<br />
groundnut pods due to infestation <strong>of</strong> bruchid Caryedon serratus (Olivier) under<br />
stored conditions. Journal <strong>of</strong> Stored Products Research, 88:101678.<br />
Tonnang, E. Z. H., Juarez, H., Carhuapoma, P., Gonzales, J. C., Mendoza, D., Sporleder, M.,<br />
Simon, R. and Kroschel, J. 2013. ILCYM - Insect Life Cycle Modeling. A s<strong>of</strong>tware<br />
package for developing temperature-based insect phenology models with<br />
applications for local, regional and global analysis <strong>of</strong> insect population and mapping,<br />
International Potato Center, Lima, Peru. pp 175.<br />
T5-42P-1621<br />
Indian Water Policy: Perspective <strong>of</strong> Rainwater Harvesting for Sustainability in Semi-<br />
Arid Regions<br />
K Sreenivas Reddy*, K Sammi Reddy and V.K Singh<br />
ICAR - Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, Santhoshnagar, Hyderabad,<br />
ks.reddy@icar.gov.in<br />
India is an agrarian country and water is a critical input in agriculture. India has 18% <strong>of</strong> world<br />
population, having 4% <strong>of</strong> world’s fresh water, out <strong>of</strong> which 80% is used in agriculture.<br />
Agriculture farming is two type rainfed and irrigated. Rainfed agriculture is practiced 80% in<br />
worldwide and contributed 70% in global food production (UNCTAD, 2011). India has about<br />
141 million ha <strong>of</strong> net cultivable area. Out <strong>of</strong> which 72 Mha (51%) net sown areas dependent<br />
on rain, and plays an important role in the country’s economy. This area accounts for nearly<br />
40 % <strong>of</strong> the total food<br />
production contributed by 80% marginal and small farmers. (Reddy et al, 2020 and DAFW,<br />
2022).The constraints like water scarcity, soil degradation, low soil fertility, low farm<br />
mechanization, low risk bearing capacity <strong>of</strong> farmers, climate change and lack <strong>of</strong> interest from<br />
private sector to invest into agriculture due to its unreliable nature, which results in very low<br />
crop productivity (0.8 to 1 t/ha)or crop failures are always concern for success <strong>of</strong> agriculture<br />
791 | Page Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
in the rainfed area. If these constraints are addressed, these areas have tremendous potential to<br />
contribute a larger share in food production and faster agricultural growth compared to the<br />
irrigated areas (Reddy et al., 2020).<br />
Targeting smallholder farmers particularly in rainfed areas and irrigated areas, <strong>of</strong>fers the best<br />
chance for reducing poverty quickly in developing countries. Small and marginal farmers<br />
constitute 86.25% <strong>of</strong> Indian farmers, 47.38% <strong>of</strong> cultivated land and over 50% <strong>of</strong> the<br />
total agricultural production is vital for not only achieving Indian agrarian economy, but also<br />
for alleviating hungry and poverty (Singh et al, 2022). Most <strong>of</strong> the small and marginal farming<br />
is rain dependent covering the SAT region in the country. They are affected by the recent trends<br />
<strong>of</strong> climate change impacts <strong>of</strong> increased frequency <strong>of</strong> droughts, floods, high rainfall intensities,<br />
increased temperatures combined with shifts in markets and prices. Moreover, these farm lands<br />
are degraded due to soil erosion making the soil unproductive and unsustainable for nutrients<br />
storage, organic carbon and other soil microorganisms useful for the plants. To make these<br />
grey lands into productive lands, a long-term strategy for addressing the weather aberrations,<br />
long dryspells, water conservation and rainwater harvesting are the key for making them green<br />
with sustainable yields, increased crop productivity by adopting efficient water management<br />
techniques for conservation <strong>of</strong> both green and blue water. Also these lands contribute 40% <strong>of</strong><br />
agricultural production with nutrious cereals, oil seeds and pulses besides other cotton and<br />
commercial crops.<br />
Since rainfed farming is rain dependent, better management <strong>of</strong> rainwater, soil moisture, and<br />
critical irrigation are the key to helping the greatest number <strong>of</strong> small holders, for three main<br />
reasons: (1) It cuts the yield losses from dry spells (2) It gives farmers the security they need<br />
to risk investing in other inputs such as fertilizers and high-yielding varieties. Farmers dare<br />
not risk the little they have buying inputs for a crop that may fail for lack <strong>of</strong> water and (3) It<br />
allows farmers to grow higher value market crops, such as vegetables or fruits. These are more<br />
sensitive to water stress and require costlier inputs. Improving agricultural productivity in<br />
areas that depend on rainfall has the greatest potential to reduce poverty and hunger, in large<br />
parts <strong>of</strong> Asia. Current yields in many rainfed settings are low and improving rainfed farming<br />
could double or quadruple yields. Such yields “gaps” are greatest for maize, sorghum, and<br />
millet and closing these gaps promises huge social, economic, and environmental paybacks<br />
(CAWMA, 2007).<br />
India receives an average <strong>of</strong> 3,000 billion cubic meters (BCM) <strong>of</strong> rainfall every year. It has<br />
been estimated that the average surface run<strong>of</strong>f (SRO) is about 1869 BCM, out <strong>of</strong> which the<br />
utilizable surface water available is 690 BCM, and ground water available is 433 BCM. An<br />
additional 200 BCM is available through interlinking <strong>of</strong> rivers in different regions <strong>of</strong> India.<br />
From the water balance <strong>of</strong> India’s water resources, the SRO contributing to oceans is 491<br />
BCM after meeting the requirement <strong>of</strong> environmental flows <strong>of</strong> 55 BCM (10% maximum)<br />
Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment<br />
792 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
which can be harvested for conservation <strong>of</strong> water and increase crop yield through proper<br />
integrated water policy.<br />
The National water policy broadly describes the water allocations and utilization patterns for<br />
major sectors <strong>of</strong> Agriculture, Industries, Domestic and environment. National Water Policy<br />
(NWP, 2012) currently in force was drafted in 2012 and is the third such policy since 1987.<br />
The NWP 2012 policy was the concept <strong>of</strong> an Integrated Water Resources Management<br />
approach that took the “river basin/ sub-basin” as a unit for planning, development and<br />
management <strong>of</strong> water resources. It states that the land, soil, energy and water management<br />
with scientific inputs should be used to evolve different agricultural strategies and improve<br />
soil and water productivity to manage droughts. Integrated farming systems and nonagricultural<br />
developments may also be considered for livelihood support and poverty<br />
alleviation. Policy intervention is also made facilitating relaxation in project clearances,<br />
funding etc. for drought-prone areas. However, so far in the country, the rainfed agriculture is<br />
neglected or not that much focused in the national policy document which basically contributes<br />
to the generation <strong>of</strong> maximum run<strong>of</strong>f potential to the storage from different river basins <strong>of</strong> the<br />
country. These rainfed grey lands suffer from extreme rainfall deficits, high intense rainfall<br />
with soil degradation through erosion, long dryspells, but contribute to 80% <strong>of</strong> the production<br />
<strong>of</strong> pulses, oilseeds and coarse cereals. Hence, it is necessary to rethink <strong>of</strong> or policy with proper<br />
allocations <strong>of</strong> green and blue water in terms <strong>of</strong> On-farm rainwater harvesting and water<br />
conservation technologies which are proved cost effective. The rainfed region is characterized<br />
into three major groups based on average annual rainfall (AAR) <strong>of</strong> low (500 – 750 mm),<br />
Medium (750-1200mm) and high (>1200mm). The areal distributions <strong>of</strong> rainfed area are<br />
22Mha, 27Mha and 23Mha in the above group <strong>of</strong> AAR across the different river basins <strong>of</strong> the<br />
country.<br />
Policymakers need to focus on both design and development <strong>of</strong> water resources infrastructure<br />
from a multiple-use system perspective. By doing so they can maximize the benefits per unit<br />
<strong>of</strong> water ensuring water security. Multiple-use systems for domestic use, crop production,<br />
aquaculture, agr<strong>of</strong>orestry, and livestock effectively improve water productivity and reduce<br />
poverty. The contributions to livelihoods, especially for poor households, <strong>of</strong> these multiple uses<br />
are substantial. As per GOI directives, it is not only Per drop more crop but also more nutrition<br />
per drop for food security in rainfed regions. The present paper deals with the perspectives <strong>of</strong><br />
rainwater harvesting, water conservation and its investments for converting these low<br />
productivity drylands into high productivity green lands in the country for the consideration<br />
<strong>of</strong> national water policy.<br />
793 | Page Emerging approaches (RS, AI, ML, Drones etc) for crop management &assessment
Theme– 6<br />
Institutional and policy innovations for<br />
accelerated and enhanced impacts
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Theme –6: Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and<br />
enhanced impacts<br />
List <strong>of</strong> <strong>Extended</strong> Summaries<br />
Sr.<br />
No.<br />
Title First Author ID<br />
1 Agrometeorological Interventions for Enhancing<br />
Farmers’ Income in The Drylands <strong>of</strong> South Interior<br />
Karnataka<br />
2 Assessing the Climate Resilience <strong>of</strong> Agricultural<br />
Development Pathways: Framework and<br />
Application<br />
3 Promoting Water Stewardship for Improving<br />
Water Governance in Groundwater Dependent<br />
Regions<br />
4 Agricultural Drought and Its Impact on Pod Yield<br />
<strong>of</strong> Rainfed Groundnut in Scarce Rainfall Zone <strong>of</strong><br />
Andhra Pradesh<br />
5 An Impact Assessment <strong>of</strong> Agromet Advisory<br />
Service (Aas) For Sustainable Agriculture and<br />
Resilient Farm Income: Study <strong>of</strong> Farm precise<br />
Mobile Application<br />
6 Institutional Interventions for Enhancing<br />
Productivity in Rainfed Agriculture<br />
7 Perceived Attributes Leading to The Adoption <strong>of</strong><br />
Agromet Advisories by Dryland Farmers in India<br />
8 Assessment <strong>of</strong> Pr<strong>of</strong>itability and Sustainability <strong>of</strong><br />
Sunflower as A Component in Emerging Cropping<br />
Systems <strong>of</strong> Northern Karnataka<br />
9 Integrated Farming System: A Scientific Approach<br />
Towards Doubling Farmers Income<br />
10 Impact <strong>of</strong> Cluster Folds in Groundnut Productivity<br />
Enhancement Under Rainfed Alfisols <strong>of</strong> YSR<br />
District, Andhra Pradesh<br />
11 Drought Mitigation <strong>of</strong> Sorghum by Spraying <strong>of</strong><br />
Foliar Nutrients on Yield and Economics Under<br />
Dryspell Situation for Southern Agroclimatic Zone<br />
<strong>of</strong> Tamil Nadu<br />
12 A Summative Evaluation <strong>of</strong> Technological<br />
Interventions in Poultry Farming<br />
13 Strengthening Smallholder Agriculture in Rainfed<br />
Areas: Livelihood Analysis <strong>of</strong> Pigeonpea Growing<br />
Farmers <strong>of</strong> Telangana State<br />
14 Institutional Innovations for Accelerating<br />
Technology Transfer: CRIDA’s Experiences<br />
Thimmegowda<br />
Arjuna Srinidhi<br />
Eshwer Kale<br />
Malleswari<br />
Sadhineni<br />
Nikhil Nikam<br />
Anshida Beevi<br />
Jagriti Rohit<br />
MR Umesh<br />
Keshav Mehra<br />
DV Srinivasulu<br />
K Baskar<br />
Prabhat Kumar<br />
Pankaj<br />
G Nirmala<br />
CA Rama Rao<br />
T6-01O-107<br />
T6-02O-1174<br />
T6-03O-1132<br />
T6-04O-1423<br />
T6-05R-1195<br />
T6-06R-1237<br />
T6-07R-1214<br />
T6-08R-1518<br />
T6-09R-1359<br />
T6-10R-1177<br />
T6-11P-1004<br />
T6-12P-1018<br />
T6-13P-1025<br />
T6-14P-1026<br />
Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts<br />
794 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Sr.<br />
No.<br />
15 Need for more flexibility in crop insurance scheme<br />
(PMFBY)<br />
16 Performance and Economic Evaluation <strong>of</strong> Agri-<br />
Horti System Under Rainfed Condition <strong>of</strong><br />
Marathwada Region<br />
17 Impact <strong>of</strong> Agricultural Extension in Managing<br />
Biotic and Abiotic Stress in Rainfed Areas<br />
18 Assessment <strong>of</strong> Cluster Front Line Demonstration<br />
(Cfld) On Green Gram (Vigna Radiata L. Wildzek)<br />
As A Climate Resilient Intervention in Rainfed<br />
Uplands Of Red & Lateritic Tracts <strong>of</strong> Purulia,<br />
West Bengal, India During Kharif Season.<br />
19 Computation <strong>of</strong> Extension Effectiveness Index and<br />
Effective Extension Approaches for Adoption <strong>of</strong><br />
Rainfed Technologies By Farmers from State<br />
Dept. Of Agriculture, Ngo and Private Extension<br />
Agency in Anantapuramu District <strong>of</strong> A.P.<br />
20 Performance <strong>of</strong> Frontline Demonstrations in Yield<br />
Enhancement <strong>of</strong> Cotton Under Arid Conditions<br />
21 Sustainable Growth in Agriculture Sector: A Case<br />
Study <strong>of</strong> Nalgonda District, Telangana State, India<br />
22 On Farm Evaluation <strong>of</strong> Farming System Modules<br />
for Improving the Pr<strong>of</strong>itability <strong>of</strong> Small and<br />
Marginal Farmers<br />
23 Evaluation <strong>of</strong> Suitable Cropping Sequence for Dry<br />
Tracts in Prakasam District <strong>of</strong> Andhra Pradesh<br />
24 Dynamics <strong>of</strong> Agricultural Land Use in Kerala - A<br />
Socio-Ecological Perspective<br />
25 Socio-Economic Pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> Farmers <strong>of</strong> North<br />
Alluvial Plane <strong>of</strong> Bihar<br />
26 Organizational Dynamics <strong>of</strong> Fpcs For Good<br />
Management<br />
27 Identification <strong>of</strong> Suitable Varieties and Dates <strong>of</strong><br />
Sowing in Cowpea for Prakasam District<br />
28 Influence <strong>of</strong> Foliar Application <strong>of</strong> Potassium<br />
Nitrate on Yield and Economics <strong>of</strong> Soybean Under<br />
Rainfed Conditions <strong>of</strong> Vidarbha<br />
29 Impact <strong>of</strong> Cluster Front Line Demonstrations on<br />
Productivity and Pr<strong>of</strong>itability <strong>of</strong> Mung Bean<br />
(Vigna Radiata L.) Var. Ipm-02-3 And Mh-421 In<br />
Churu District <strong>of</strong> Rajasthan<br />
30 Effect <strong>of</strong> Time <strong>of</strong> Application and Different Foliar<br />
Sprays on Yield and Economics <strong>of</strong> Cotton<br />
Title First Author ID<br />
A Amarendar<br />
Reddy<br />
AS Gunjkar<br />
VP Suryavanshi<br />
A Chakraborty<br />
K Ravi Shankar<br />
Arvind Singh<br />
Tetarwal<br />
Harish Balduri<br />
YD Charjan<br />
Rajesh Chowdary<br />
Rose Mathews<br />
Amrendra Kumar<br />
Akhil Ajith<br />
S Bharathi<br />
MM Ganvir<br />
Harish Kumar<br />
Rachhoiya<br />
AB Chorey<br />
T6-15P-1673<br />
T6-16P-1053<br />
T6-17P-1074<br />
T6-18P-1079<br />
T6-19P-1092<br />
T6-20P-1118<br />
T6-21P-1138<br />
T6-22P-1164<br />
T6-23P-1182<br />
T6-24P-1200<br />
T6-25P-1204<br />
T6-26P-1209<br />
T6-27P-1236<br />
T6-28P-1246<br />
T6-29P-1254<br />
T6-30P-1269<br />
795 | Page Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Sr.<br />
No.<br />
31 Production Potential & Economic Feasibility <strong>of</strong><br />
Pigeon Pea Base Intercropping System in Scarcity<br />
Zone <strong>of</strong> Maharashtra<br />
32 Decomposition <strong>of</strong> Agricultural Growth by Sources<br />
in Andhra Pradesh<br />
Title First Author ID<br />
K Kathmaley<br />
G Samba<br />
Shiva<br />
T6-31P-1274<br />
T6-32P-1306<br />
33 Diversification in Agriculture Boon for Farmers. UN Umesh T6-33P-1312<br />
34 Capacity Needs Assessment for Integrating<br />
Nutrition Objectives into Extension Advisory<br />
Service (Eas) Programs<br />
35 Studies on Productivity and Economics <strong>of</strong><br />
Different Maize Based Intercropping Systems<br />
Under Rainfed Conditions <strong>of</strong> Jammu<br />
36 Integration <strong>of</strong> Millet Crops in Rice Fallow Ecology<br />
for System Intensification<br />
37 Impact <strong>of</strong> Millets Consumption Pattern on<br />
Lifestyle Diseases <strong>of</strong> The Tribal and Urban<br />
Population, Telangana<br />
38 Awareness <strong>of</strong> Natural Resource Management<br />
Among Farm Women<br />
39 Impact <strong>of</strong> NICRA Project Through Analysis <strong>of</strong><br />
Different Success Point<br />
40 Intercropping with Sugarcane for Dfi In Eastern<br />
Uttar Pradesh<br />
41 Agricultural Market Intelligence Center -<br />
Forecasting <strong>of</strong> Redgram Prices in Telangana State<br />
by Arimax<br />
42 Additional Income Through Cultivation <strong>of</strong><br />
Redgram On Paddy Field Bunds<br />
43 Impact <strong>of</strong> Frontline Demonstrations on Yield <strong>of</strong><br />
Wheat (Triticum Aestivum) Under NICRA<br />
Villages <strong>of</strong> District Jhansi U.P.<br />
44 Impact Assessment on Yield and Economics <strong>of</strong><br />
Improved Varieties <strong>of</strong> Pea (Pisum Sativum L.)<br />
Through Technology Demonstration in NICRA<br />
Villages <strong>of</strong> Tehri Garhwal, Uttarakhand<br />
45 Impact <strong>of</strong> Weather Based Agro-Advisory Services<br />
on Upliftment <strong>of</strong> Farming Communities <strong>of</strong><br />
Ramanathapuram District, Tamil Nadu<br />
46 Importance <strong>of</strong> Solar Light Trap in Integrated Pest<br />
Management<br />
47 Impact <strong>of</strong> Residual Soil Moisture on Yields and<br />
Pr<strong>of</strong>itability <strong>of</strong> Rainfed Cropping Sequences<br />
Veenita Kumari<br />
AP Singh<br />
U Triveni<br />
J Shirisha<br />
SG Puri<br />
Rajiv Kumar<br />
Ashok Rai<br />
R Vijaya Kumari<br />
S Neelaveni<br />
Adesh Kumar<br />
G Alok<br />
M Vengateswari<br />
Manoj Kumar<br />
Ahirwar<br />
ML Jadav<br />
T6-34P-1320<br />
T6-35P-1326<br />
T6-36P-1376<br />
T6-37P-1386<br />
T6-38P-1391<br />
T6-39P-1436<br />
T6-40P-1441<br />
T6-41P-1451<br />
T6-42P-1458<br />
T6-43P-1500<br />
T6-44P-1502<br />
T6-45P-1541<br />
T6-46P-1556<br />
T6-47P-1560<br />
Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts<br />
796 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Sr.<br />
No.<br />
48 Technology Need Assessment <strong>of</strong> Cool Season<br />
Vegetable Growers in Kerala<br />
49 Realizing Better Yield and Returns <strong>of</strong> Chickpea<br />
Crop Through Cluster Frontline Demonstrations<br />
50 Achieving Fodder self-sufficiency using Natural<br />
Farming Methods and Community Action in a<br />
Rainfed Region: The case <strong>of</strong> Ayyavaripalli<br />
Village, India<br />
51 Enhancement <strong>of</strong> Yield and Economic indices by<br />
the adoption <strong>of</strong> cotton + redgram intercropping<br />
syatem inder rainfed conditions <strong>of</strong> Mancherial<br />
District, Telangana State<br />
52 Crop diversification with castor crop for<br />
maximizing productivity and pr<strong>of</strong>itability in<br />
Ananthapuramu district <strong>of</strong> Andhra Pradesh<br />
53 Institutional Interventions for Climate Risk<br />
Management<br />
Title First Author ID<br />
Alaka s Balan<br />
Ramesh Kumar<br />
U Sudhakar<br />
I Thirupathi<br />
G Sashikala<br />
K Nagasree<br />
T6-48P-1623<br />
T6-49P<br />
T6-50P-1146<br />
T6-51P-1277<br />
T6-52P-1515<br />
T6-53P-1668<br />
797 | Page Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
T6-01O-1076<br />
Agrometeorological Interventions for Enhancing Farmers’ Income in the<br />
Drylands <strong>of</strong> South Interior Karnataka<br />
M. N. Thimmegowda*, M. H. Manjunatha, Lingaraj Huggi, L. Nagesha and<br />
D. V. Soumya<br />
AICRP on Agrometeorology, UAS, GKVK, Bengaluru560065, Karnataka, India<br />
* mnthimmegowda@gmail.com<br />
In developing countries like India, ensuring food security to growing population is the main<br />
challenge in the face <strong>of</strong> changing climate. Inter and intra-annual variability in climate impacts<br />
agricultural production. Among several methods to overcome such ill impacts <strong>of</strong> climate on<br />
agriculture, forecasting and educating the farmers about possible upcoming variability in the<br />
regional climate is one. In this direction, agromet advisory services were issued to farmers in<br />
four districts, viz., Bangalore urban & rural, Kolar and Chikkaballapur, in the dryland regions<br />
<strong>of</strong> south interior Karnataka using Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs) and<br />
their effect on crop productivity was studied.<br />
Methodology<br />
AICRP on Agrometeorology, University <strong>of</strong> Agricultural Sciences, Bangalore is playing a major<br />
role in communicating the weather information to farmers through Gramin Krishi Mausam<br />
Sewa (GKMS), funded by India Meteorological Department (IMD) and National Innovations<br />
in Climate Resilient Agriculture (NICRA) <strong>of</strong> Indian Council <strong>of</strong> Agricultural Research. The<br />
forecasts issued by IMD are used to inform farmers about the forthcoming weather vagaries<br />
and necessary actions to be taken to minimize or avoid crop losses. The utility <strong>of</strong> weather<br />
forecast depends upon their reliability and applicability at micro level (Singh et al. 2004). We<br />
assessed the reliability <strong>of</strong> forecasts issued by IMD and evaluate the cost economics <strong>of</strong><br />
implementation <strong>of</strong> agromet advisory.<br />
Study area and agromet information shared: Four dry farming districts in the south interior<br />
Karnataka were selected for the study, viz., Bangalore urban & rural, Kolar and Chikkaballapur<br />
to share the weather information twice a week based on IMD’s forecast. The districts differed<br />
with respect to the annual and seasonal rainfall distribution, Bangalore Urban received an<br />
annual rainfall <strong>of</strong> 854.6 mm, <strong>of</strong> which 460.1 mm received in South-west monsoon (SWM) and<br />
233.7 mm in North-East Monsoon (NEM). Bangalore rural received a normal annual rainfall<br />
<strong>of</strong> 809.2 mm out <strong>of</strong> which 440.7 mm in SWM and 228.9 mm in NEM. Chikkaballapur receives<br />
a normal annual rainfall <strong>of</strong> 731.3 mm divided into 399.8 mm in SWM and 222.2 mm in NEM.<br />
Kolar, being an eastern most dry district, receives 746.4 mm annual rainfall <strong>of</strong> which 386.8<br />
mm received in SWM and 236.3 mm in NEM (Sanjeevaiahet al. 2021). This variability in the,<br />
Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts<br />
798 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
annual and seasonal rainfall has caused the variations in the crop productivity in the regions,<br />
making it necessary to take weather-based crop management practices (Shivaramu et al. 2022).<br />
Preparation process <strong>of</strong> agro-advisories: Based on the forecasts received on rainfall,<br />
temperature, wind speed, humidity and cloud cover from IMD and state met centres, the<br />
probable impacts on the crops or cropping systems in the districts was discussed with the<br />
scientists belonging to respective discipline.<br />
The major crops and cropping systems in the region are field crops like finger millet, maize,<br />
vegetable crops like cabbage, leafy vegetables, etc. and fruit crops like grapes and flower crops like<br />
rose, marigold, chrysanthemum, etc. Most <strong>of</strong> these crops are <strong>of</strong> short duration and yields are<br />
sensitive to even minor climatic aberration. Based on the consultations with relevant experts,<br />
advisories for reducing the crop losses are sent directly to farmers’ mobile through WhatsApp and<br />
are also displayed at community centres so that the information reaches individual farmer.<br />
Assessment <strong>of</strong> impact: A comparison <strong>of</strong> farmers who received the advisories (AAS farmer) with<br />
those who did not (non-AAS farmer) was made with respect to various parameters. The cost <strong>of</strong><br />
cultivation, gross income, net income and benefit cost ratio <strong>of</strong> these farmers was calculated per<br />
annum, and averaged for multi-year impact assessment.<br />
District Parameters Rainfall (mm) Maximum (°C) Minimum (°C)<br />
Bengaluru rural<br />
Bengaluru Urban<br />
Kolar<br />
Chikkaballapur<br />
Wind speed<br />
(km/hr)<br />
Obs.* 366 366 366 366<br />
Correct 144(39) 162(44) 128(35) 89(24)<br />
incorrect 212(58) 97(27) 108(29) 195(53)<br />
Obs.* 366 366 366 366<br />
Correct 150(54) 166(45) 129(35) 94(26)<br />
Not usable 196(5) 94(26) 112(31) 194(53)<br />
Obs.* 360 360 360 360<br />
Correct 146(41) 158(44) 244(68) 151(42)<br />
Not usable 200(56) 102(28) 28(8) 116(32)<br />
Obs.* 362 362 362 362<br />
Correct 161(44) 163(45) 250(69) 173(48)<br />
Not usable 193(53) 100(28) 27(7) 123(34)<br />
799 | Page Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
*Total number <strong>of</strong> advisories sent. Numbers in parentheses indicate percent success/failure <strong>of</strong><br />
forecast.<br />
Results<br />
Usability <strong>of</strong> forecasts: The advisories based on rainfall were least usable (39, 54, 41 and 44%<br />
in Bengaluru rural, Bengaluru urban, Kolar and Chikkaballapur, respectively) mainly due to<br />
weak agreement <strong>of</strong> forecast rainfall with actual. The agreement between forecast and observed<br />
maximum temperature was 24, 26, 42 and 48% in Bengaluru rural, Bengaluru urban, Kolar and<br />
Chikkaballapur, respectively. The forecasted minimum temperature had 35, 35, 68 and 69%<br />
agreement with observed. And, forecasted wind speed had 24, 26, 42 and 48% agreement with<br />
the observed wind speed. This dissimilarity between the observed and forecasted weather<br />
parameters indicate the need for improving forecasts for precise agromet advisory issue.<br />
Though there was a moderate similarity between forecasts and observed weather parameters,<br />
the advisories on crop management were issued and the impact <strong>of</strong> issued advisories were<br />
assessed using BC ratio. The farmers receiving advisory (AASF) compared to those not<br />
receiving advisory (non-AASF) received more incomes reflected in in BC ratios <strong>of</strong> AASFs<br />
(2.0, 2.7, 1.6 and 2.8 in field, vegetable, flower and fruit crops, respectively) as compared to<br />
non-AASF (1.6, 1.7, 1.3 and 1.7 in field, vegetable, flower and fruit crops, respectively). Thus<br />
it is evident that weather forecasts and their better usability upon proper dissemination <strong>of</strong><br />
information helped improve farm incomes in the drylands <strong>of</strong> Sothern Interior Karnataka.<br />
Conclusion<br />
The outcome <strong>of</strong> the study showed the poor accuracy <strong>of</strong> forecasted rainfall, though the forecastbased<br />
crop management advices resulted in improved crop productivity through timely<br />
management and changing crop management practices based on the forecasts given. This<br />
stresses the role <strong>of</strong> meteorological institutions in securing higher crop productivity.<br />
Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts<br />
800 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
References<br />
Singh, S., Rao, V.U.M. and Singh, D. 2004. Scientific support in farm decision making through<br />
weather based advisory services in Haryana, J. Agrometeorology, 6, 265-267.<br />
Shivaramu, H. S., Manjunatha, M. H., Huggi, L.,Bal, S. K., Kumar, V. P., Padmashri, H. S.,<br />
Soumya, D. V., Nagesha, L. and Mohanty, M. 2022. Soil moisture induced yield<br />
variability in major crops <strong>of</strong> Karnataka, Indian J. Agric. Sci., 92 (7): 836–41.<br />
Sanjeevaiah, S.H., Rudrappa, K.S., Lakshminarasappa, M.T., Huggi, L.,Hanumanthaiah, M.<br />
M., Venkatappa, S. D.; Lingegowda, N. and Sreeman, S.M. 2021. Understanding the<br />
Temporal Variability <strong>of</strong> Rainfall for Estimating Agro-Climatic Onset <strong>of</strong> Cropping Season<br />
over South Interior Karnataka, India. Agronomy, 11, 1135.<br />
T6-02O-1174<br />
Assessing the Climate Resilience <strong>of</strong> Agricultural Development Pathways:<br />
Framework and Application<br />
Arjuna Srinidhi 1,2 , Saskia E. Werners 1,3 , Marcella D’Souza 2 , Fulco Ludwig 1 and<br />
Miranda P.M. Meuwissen 4<br />
1<br />
Water Systems and Global Change Group, Wageningen University & Research<br />
2<br />
Watershed Organisation Trust (WOTR), Pune - Satara Rd, Maharashtra 411009<br />
3<br />
Institute for Environment and Human Security, United Nations University<br />
4 Business Economics Group, Wageningen University & Research.<br />
Semiarid regions in India are characterized by poor natural resources, smallholder farmers, and<br />
an increasing frequency <strong>of</strong> extreme weather events. The vulnerability <strong>of</strong> semiarid farming<br />
systems to climate change and the state <strong>of</strong> agrarian distress in India underscores the need to<br />
assess their climate resilience (Kuchimanchi et al., 2019). Weaknesses in existing resilience<br />
assessment frameworks include a bias towards assessing the status quo, and the lack <strong>of</strong> clarity<br />
between assessing resilience to specific stresses and the more general resilience attributes <strong>of</strong> a<br />
system. The objective <strong>of</strong> our research is to develop a context specific framework to assess the<br />
climate resilience <strong>of</strong> semiarid farming systems in India. Application <strong>of</strong> the framework to two<br />
different farming systems in India help us to generate insights on the contribution <strong>of</strong><br />
agricultural development interventions to the climate resilience <strong>of</strong> farming systems in semiarid<br />
India.<br />
Methodology<br />
To develop a climate resilience assessment framework specific to semiarid regions in India, we<br />
followed a two-stage process. The first stage involved identifying the broad steps and generic<br />
functions, resilience capacities and attributes from existing literature on the resilience <strong>of</strong><br />
801 | Page Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
farming systems. Literature on impact assessment <strong>of</strong> watershed development (WSD)<br />
interventions in India and the local knowledge and experience <strong>of</strong> the research team also<br />
contributed to this first stage. The second stage involved applying the framework in a case<br />
study (CS1) and using the insights generated to refine the context-specific list <strong>of</strong> system<br />
functions, indicators, resilience capacities and attributes. To generate insights on agricultural<br />
interventions and their contribution to climate resilience, we applied the CRISI framework to<br />
assess two different farming systems located in Jalna district, Maharashtra – i) where<br />
interventions aimed at improving agricultural productivity and irrigation infrastructure (CS2);<br />
and ii) where interventions targeted the building <strong>of</strong> adaptative capacities in addition to<br />
improving agricultural productivity (CS3). We also apply a pathways lens by considering the<br />
cumulative effect <strong>of</strong> all agriculture related interventions over 15 years.<br />
Results<br />
The CRISI framework consists <strong>of</strong> the following six steps. These steps are: 1. System<br />
description; 2. Challenges; 3. System functions; 4. Resilience capacities; 5. Resilience<br />
attributes; and 6. Reflection (Table 1). We find that having a river with water availability nearly<br />
all year round, and better irrigation infrastructure, are key to the resilience <strong>of</strong> CS2. On the other<br />
hand, CS3 demonstrates other forms <strong>of</strong> resilience such as better social organisation within the<br />
community and efficient management <strong>of</strong> the limited water resources. We also find a greater<br />
degree <strong>of</strong> ownership and post-project sustainability in CS3. Discussions with stakeholders in<br />
CS3 showed that some <strong>of</strong> this sustainability can be attributed to interventions that had a focus<br />
on the health <strong>of</strong> its ecosystem, monitoring & evaluation <strong>of</strong> activities and the capacity building<br />
interventions, particularly <strong>of</strong> the institutions that were set up, such as the Village Development<br />
Committee and a Farmer Producer Organisation.<br />
No.<br />
CRISI<br />
step<br />
1 System<br />
description<br />
Overview <strong>of</strong> the 6 steps in the CRISI framework<br />
Actions to be taken in the assessment<br />
Understand and describe the context, spatial and time scale, stakeholders, etc<br />
2 Challenges Explore stakeholders’ views <strong>of</strong> environmental (including climate), economic,<br />
social and institutional stresses<br />
3 System<br />
functions<br />
4 Resilience<br />
capacities<br />
Assess the performance <strong>of</strong> indicators related to the following 10 system<br />
functions: 1) Social organisation, 2) Economic viability, 3) Food and nutrition<br />
security, 4) Animal health and welfare, 5) Other bio-based resources, 6) Health<br />
<strong>of</strong> ecosystem, 7) Biodiversity <strong>of</strong> habitat, 8) Attractiveness <strong>of</strong> area, 9) Quality <strong>of</strong><br />
life, 10) Equity (standard <strong>of</strong> living)<br />
Assess the 4 capacities <strong>of</strong> Anticipation, Robustness, Adaptability, &<br />
Transformability by considering the story behind the performance <strong>of</strong> the<br />
indicators (step 3)<br />
Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts<br />
802 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
5 Resilience<br />
attributes<br />
Assess the following 16 resilience attributes:1) Reasonable pr<strong>of</strong>itability, 2)<br />
Social self-organization, 3) Ecological self-regulation, 4) Appropriate<br />
connectedness, 5) Functional diversity, 6) Optimal redundancy, 7) Spatial &<br />
temporal heterogeneity, 8) Exposure to disturbance, 9) Reflectivity & shared<br />
learning, 10) Human capital building, 11) Diverse policies, 12) Infrastructure &<br />
information for innovation, 13) Support for rural life, 14) Access to credit,<br />
insurance & other financial safety nets, 15) Equity (decision making & power<br />
dynamics), 16) Governance arrangements that support transformation<br />
6 Reflection Discuss and reflect on the accuracy <strong>of</strong> assessment, the need for additional<br />
resilience building<br />
Conclusion<br />
We find that CRISI’s inclusiveness in identification <strong>of</strong> stakeholder needs, its systemic<br />
understanding <strong>of</strong> resilience and provision <strong>of</strong> information for decision making make it useful<br />
for the farming community, practitioners and policy makers in assessing and building climate<br />
resilience. Application <strong>of</strong> the CRISI framework shows that agricultural interventions in<br />
semiarid India that primarily focus on improving agriculture productivity and irrigation<br />
infrastructure have a limited influence on the climate resilience. While these are important,<br />
farming systems show much greater climate resilience when interventions are designed to also<br />
address system functions related to the health <strong>of</strong> ecosystem and social organisation, and general<br />
resilience attributes related to diversity, human capital, and governance. Our findings also urge<br />
policy makers and development organisations to include monitoring, evaluation, learning and<br />
adaptive decision making in future interventions. These findings also resonance with a<br />
pathways approach to building future climate resilience. Co-creating such climate resilient<br />
development pathways, particularly for semiarid farming systems in India, would be a valuable<br />
area for further research.<br />
References<br />
Kuchimanchi, B.R., Nazareth, D., Bendapudi, R., Awasthi, S and D’souza, M. 2019. Assessing<br />
differential vulnerability <strong>of</strong> communities in the agrarian context in two districts <strong>of</strong><br />
Maharashtra, India. Climate and Development, 11, 918-929.<br />
T6-03O-1132<br />
Promoting Water Stewardship for Improving Water Governance in<br />
Groundwater Dependent Regions<br />
Eshwer Kale* and Marcella D’Souza<br />
Watershed Organisation Trust (WOTR), Pune, Maharashtra 411009, India<br />
*eshwer.kale@wotr.org.in<br />
Groundwater is the backbone <strong>of</strong> India’s agriculture and drinking water security, as India is the<br />
largest groundwater user in the world. Groundwater supports 84% <strong>of</strong> the country’s net irrigated<br />
803 | Page Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
area and 90% <strong>of</strong> its rural water needs (World Bank, 2010). Rapid changes in land use and land<br />
cover patterns, expanding urbanization, growing population, and changing monsoon patterns<br />
in the wake <strong>of</strong> climate change are putting increasing pressure on our water resources and<br />
exacerbating the water crisis. However, one can see the poor governance <strong>of</strong> this precious<br />
resource at different levels. Although there are ample laws and regulations and a handful <strong>of</strong><br />
success stories <strong>of</strong> community-based water management, as rightly described, India’s water<br />
future is ‘turbulent’ at a large level (Briscoe and Malik, 2006). There is ‘anarchy’ at the<br />
groundwater use and extraction level (Shah, 2009). Therefore, developing and testing<br />
appropriate and feasible solutions for governing the groundwater resource and taking them at<br />
scale is the need <strong>of</strong> the hour. The present paper highlights the lessons learned from action<br />
research designed and implemented in 100 villages <strong>of</strong> Maharashtra by WOTR to improve water<br />
governance at the local level. The action research was designed to understand the enablers and<br />
barriers to promoting appropriate groundwater governance with the aim <strong>of</strong> achieving<br />
community-led responsible water use that is environmentally sustainable, socially judicious,<br />
and economically efficient.<br />
Methodology<br />
Massive data sets were created regarding socio-economic and biophysical assets during pre and<br />
post-interventions and were compared to understand the significance <strong>of</strong> different components<br />
implemented. Also, rich qualitative data was generated through many stakeholder workshops<br />
and case studies. Thus, the systematic process documentation made during the study is used as<br />
an important data source for this paper. The concept <strong>of</strong> water stewardship considers that every<br />
individual has a right to water, and this right comes with a responsibility and accountability to<br />
oneself and the community for the appropriate resource management. Water users are viewed<br />
not as passive beneficiaries or recipients to exploit the resource but as custodians to use and<br />
benefit from it while protecting and managing it for the future. Hence, water resources are<br />
viewed as a public trust rather than a private good. The stewardship approach brings the<br />
different users/stakeholders together on one platform, establishing a dialogue based on<br />
knowledge and information, and arriving at a consensus for the preparation and execution <strong>of</strong><br />
the plan for water management.<br />
Results<br />
The outcomes <strong>of</strong> this effort have been positive and encouraging. At the end <strong>of</strong> the project period,<br />
<strong>of</strong> the 100 villages where WSI (Water Stewardship Initiative) work was carried out, the<br />
performance <strong>of</strong> 46 was satisfactory, that <strong>of</strong> 35 was moderately satisfactory, while 18 villages<br />
have underperformed. All the communities have become aware <strong>of</strong> the causal relationship<br />
between the water crisis facing them and their water usage and management practices. In all<br />
the villages, communities have drawn up water stewardship action plans, and 75% have<br />
Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts<br />
804 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
submitted these to the authorities. People have taken steps small and big, some more and others<br />
less, at both the household and village levels to manage and use water efficiently. Small<br />
behavioral changes with regard to water use are observed at home and in the fields. The number<br />
<strong>of</strong> farmers adopting water-efficient technologies and better farming techniques is increasing<br />
across all villages. Moreover, community contribution and governmental action have increased<br />
water harvesting capacity and availability in all the villages. Motivation and mobilization for<br />
community action have helped to realize these outcomes. The VWMT and the Jal Sevaks played<br />
an important role in sensitizing people and organizing them to undertake water budgeting<br />
practices in the villages and, more importantly, framing the village-level norms and regulations<br />
regarding water use and crop practices (D’Souza et al., 2019).<br />
Conclusion<br />
The WSI has provided valuable experiences and lessons in understanding the complex<br />
relationships and compulsions that influence behaviors that determine access to and use <strong>of</strong><br />
water at the ground level. The project has also highlighted the need to develop an enabling policy<br />
and institutional framework that facilitates and incentivises community and other stakeholders’<br />
participation across society. The project must develop an enabling policy and institutional<br />
framework that enables participation and also these efforts must be accompanied by sustained<br />
and large-scale, multi-format sensitisation campaigns, capacity building and skill upgradation<br />
<strong>of</strong> water users, better governance measures, and the constitution <strong>of</strong> developmental and<br />
regulatory agencies at all levels. In addition, the establishment <strong>of</strong> a mechanism that enforces<br />
related policies and regulations for the common good in a transparent, fair, and consistent<br />
manner is necessary if the culture and practice <strong>of</strong> “water stewardship” are to become a way <strong>of</strong><br />
life. The initiative contributes to the Sustainable Development Goals 6, 12, 13, and 16 and<br />
reduces the overall use <strong>of</strong> natural resources and thus contributes to a low-carbon development<br />
pathway and lessons for operationalizing groundwater management-related policies.<br />
References<br />
Briscoe, J. and Malik, P. 2006. India’s Water Economy: Bracing for a Turbulent Future, Oxford<br />
University Press, New Delhi, India<br />
D’Souza, M., Kale, E., and Pinjan, H. 2019. A Step towards Quenching Rural India’s Thirst,<br />
Experiences and Learnings from the Water Stewardship Initiative in Maharashtra.<br />
Watershed Organisation Trust (WOTR), Pune.<br />
Kale, E., Pinjan, H. and D’Souza, M. 2022. Water Stewardship in Rural India: A How-to<br />
Manual, Watershed Organisation Trust (WOTR), Pune<br />
Shah, T. 2009, ‘Taming the Anarchy: groundwater governance in South Asia’, International<br />
Water Management Institute (IWMI), Colombo, Sri Lanka<br />
805 | Page Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
World Bank. 2010. Deep Wells and Prudence: Towards Pragmatic Action for Addressing<br />
Groundwater Overexploitation in India, The International Bank for Reconstruction<br />
and Development/The World Bank, Washington, D.C, USA<br />
T6-04O-1423<br />
Agricultural Drought and its Impact on Pod Yield <strong>of</strong> Rainfed Groundnut<br />
in Scarce Rainfall Zone <strong>of</strong> Andhra Pradesh<br />
Malleswari Sadhineni 1 , G. Narayana Swamy 1 , K.C. Nataraj 1 , A.V.M Subba Rao 2 and<br />
S.K Bal 2<br />
1 Acharya N.G. Ranga Agricultural University, Andhra Pradesh<br />
2 ICAR-Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, Hyderabad - 500030, Telangana<br />
The major production constraint for rainfed groundnut in scarce rainfall zone <strong>of</strong> Andhra<br />
Pradesh is the limited available soil moisture due to frequent dry spells. In rainfed lands<br />
available soil moisture plays a key role for the growth and yield <strong>of</strong> crops and hence, it is one<br />
<strong>of</strong> the indicators used to study the impact <strong>of</strong> drought on growth and yield <strong>of</strong> rainfed groundnut.<br />
Therefore, the percent available soil moisture (PASM) helps to assess the phenophase-wise<br />
impact <strong>of</strong> agricultural drought on crop yield as one <strong>of</strong> the critical indicators.<br />
Methodology<br />
Agricultural drought and its impact on crop growth and yield <strong>of</strong> groundnut in Ananthapur<br />
district <strong>of</strong> Andhra Pradesh was studied by collecting soil moisture and pod yield from the crop<br />
weather relationship in groundnut experiment conducted during Kharif, 2012 to 2017 (6 years)<br />
under AICRP on Agrometeorology at Agricultural Research Station, Ananthapur. The<br />
groundnut variety K-6 was grown in three sowing environments viz., 1 st FN <strong>of</strong> July, 2 nd FN <strong>of</strong><br />
July and 1 st FN <strong>of</strong> August under rainfed condition on red sandy loam soil. The depth <strong>of</strong> soil in<br />
the experimental site was 60 cm. The soil moisture at field capacity was 71.6 mm and<br />
Permanent wilting point was 18.9 mm. The soil moisture was measured from emergence to<br />
physiological maturity at 0-40 cm depth using Delta-T soil moisture probe at weekly interval<br />
and 24 hours after receiving rainfall.<br />
The Percent Available Soil Moisture (PASM) was derived from the measured soil moisture<br />
data using the formula PASM = ((SMw-PWP)/(FC-PWP)) *100, Where SMw is weekly soil<br />
moisture (vol/vol) for current week, FC is Field capacity <strong>of</strong> soil (Vol/Vol) and PWP is<br />
Permanent Wilting point <strong>of</strong> soil (vol/vol). The calculated PASM values were categorized<br />
phenophase wise into severe drought (25 and <br />
50 and 75) to study the influence <strong>of</strong> PASM on pod yield (kg/ha) <strong>of</strong><br />
groundnut (Anonymous, 2016).<br />
Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts<br />
806 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Results<br />
The weekly PASM values across various phenophases revealed that, crop experienced severe<br />
and moderate drought at all the phenophases <strong>of</strong> crop growth as shown in the table. Crop which<br />
experienced severe drought (6-16% PASM) at all phenophases recorded pod yield <strong>of</strong> 802 kg<br />
ha -1 , moderate drought (33-42% PASM) recorded 1151 kg ha -1 . While, the crop with mild<br />
drought (58-64% PASM) at vegetative, flowering, pegging and pod development stages<br />
produced pod yield <strong>of</strong> 1573 kg ha -1 , the crop with no drought (90-100% PASM) at all the<br />
phenophases recorded 1364 kg ha -1 pod yield. However, the crop did not experience mild<br />
drought at emergence, maturity and no drought at maturity stage.<br />
It was observed that the crop which experienced no drought at pegging recorded lower yield<br />
(1066 kg ha -1 ) compared to one which experienced, moderate drought (1296 kg ha -1 ) and mild<br />
drought (1400 kg ha -1 ). It indicates that the groundnut crop needs moderate to mild drought<br />
conditions (36-64% PASM) for development <strong>of</strong> effective pegs and higher soil moisture (95%<br />
PASM), low moisture (12% PASM) at this stage is detrimental to crop yield. Positive and<br />
significant correlation between soil moisture and pod yield <strong>of</strong> groundnut was also reported by<br />
Guled et al2013).<br />
Severe drought at pod development stage has reduced pod yield (661 kg ha -1 ) compared to<br />
moderate drought (962 kg ha -1 ), mild drought (1435 kg ha -1 ) and no drought has recorded higher<br />
pod yield (1517 kg ha -1 ). This clearly indicates the importance <strong>of</strong> adequate soil moisture at pod<br />
development, which is the most critical phenophase <strong>of</strong> groundnut to harvest higher pod yield<br />
under rainfed situation.<br />
Conclusion<br />
The analysis <strong>of</strong> percent available soil moisture and pod yield <strong>of</strong> groundnut revealed that, the<br />
crop was experiencing moderate drought during crop growth period in most <strong>of</strong> the years. The<br />
effect <strong>of</strong> severe drought was more under late sowing compared to normal sowing during 1 st and<br />
2 nd FN <strong>of</strong> July. The crop subjected to mild drought during the crop growing period irrespective<br />
<strong>of</strong> the sowing environment and phenophases, produced higher pod yield compared to no<br />
drought and moderate drought condition. Moderate to mild drought at pegging and mild or no<br />
drought at pod development are having significant influence on pod yield <strong>of</strong> groundnut crop<br />
grown in Ananthapuramu district <strong>of</strong> Andhra Pradesh.<br />
References<br />
Anonymous. 2016. Manual for drought management. Department <strong>of</strong> Agriculture, Cooperation<br />
& Farmers Welfare, Ministry <strong>of</strong> Agriculture & Farmers Welfare Government <strong>of</strong> India. Pp<br />
37-39.<br />
807 | Page Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Guled, P. M., Shekh, A. M., Patel, H. R. and Pandey V. 2013. Effect <strong>of</strong> soil moisture,<br />
evapotranspiration, stress degree days on pod yield <strong>of</strong> groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L).<br />
J.<strong>of</strong> Agrometeorol. 15 (2): 135-137.<br />
Mean Pod yield <strong>of</strong> groundnut (kg ha -1 ) as influenced by PASM (%) at various<br />
Phenophase /<br />
PASM<br />
phenophases <strong>of</strong> groundnut (PASM values in parenthesis)<br />
Severe<br />
drought<br />
(25 and 50 and<br />
75)<br />
Emergence 399 (16) 849 (42) - 1680 (92) 976<br />
Vegetative 766 (15) 839 (40) 1999 (59) 1110 (99) 1179<br />
Flowering 1147 (10) 1494 (42) 1459 (64) 1448 (100) 1387<br />
Pegging 867 (12) 1296 (34) 1400 (58) 1066 (95) 1157<br />
Pod Development 661 (8) 962 (36) 1435 (64) 1517 (90) 1144<br />
Maturity 970 (6) 1464 (33) - - 1217<br />
Mean 802 1151 1573 1364 1183<br />
Mea<br />
n<br />
T6-05R-1195<br />
An Impact Assessment <strong>of</strong> Agromet Advisory Service (AAS) for<br />
Sustainable Agriculture and Resilient Farm Income: Study <strong>of</strong> Farm<br />
Precise Mobile Application<br />
Nikhil Nikam 1* , Nitin Kumbhar 2 , Ajay Shelke 2<br />
1<br />
Watershed Organisation Trust (WOTR), Pune, Maharashtra<br />
2<br />
Sanjeevani Institute for Empowerment and Development (SIED), Aurangabad, Maharashtra<br />
* nikhil.nikam@wotr.org.in<br />
Agromet Advisory Services (AAS) are crucial for agricultural planning and adaptation<br />
responses. Earlier, farmers could predict the arrival <strong>of</strong> monsoons based on their past<br />
experiences; now, changing climate makes it challenging to make predictions based on<br />
experiences alone (Wang et al. 2022). Therefore, reliable forecasts <strong>of</strong> weather events are<br />
needed on short and long-time scales to minimize agriculture losses. Adopting technological<br />
innovations is one <strong>of</strong> the most promising and investigated ways to adapt to climate change<br />
(Lybbert and Sumner 2012). At the same time, it builds the capacity <strong>of</strong> communities and<br />
individuals to plan and implement adaptive responses in the face <strong>of</strong> changing climate. There<br />
are quite a few methods to disseminate the advisories to the farmers; however, Watershed<br />
Organisation Trust (WOTR) undertook an action research project where a mobile<br />
application was developed to provide farm-level agro-advisory services to farmers. This<br />
study was undertaken with objective to measure the impact <strong>of</strong> the FarmPrecise mobile app<br />
on reducing the climate-induced losses <strong>of</strong> agrarian communities through specific indicators.<br />
Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts<br />
808 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Methodology<br />
A baseline household survey <strong>of</strong> 360 respondents from 36 villages <strong>of</strong> the Ahmednagar, Jalna,<br />
and Dhule districts <strong>of</strong> Maharashtra was conducted in December 2017. Randomly ten<br />
households were selected from each village. The results <strong>of</strong> the baseline study helped to<br />
restructure the strategies <strong>of</strong> the FarmPrecise application. In December 2021, an impact<br />
assessment study was conducted with the same respondents to know the usefulness <strong>of</strong> the<br />
FarmPrecise advisory. In the sample, 92 respondents (treatment group) installed and<br />
adopted the FarmPrecise advisories, and 252 did farming as usual (control group). The<br />
descriptive statistic method has been used for the analysis. Baseline data is compared to the<br />
midterm data to understand the change in technology adaptation and agricultural practices.<br />
Results<br />
The use <strong>of</strong> mobile applications as an information source for agro-met advisories has<br />
increased compared to the baseline scenario. The study finding showed that the use <strong>of</strong><br />
mobile applications for agricultural information sources increased from 35.6 to 44.2 % <strong>of</strong><br />
households. Based on the survey <strong>of</strong> assessing the number <strong>of</strong> farmers relying on different<br />
mobile applications as agricultural information source in the initial times majority <strong>of</strong> them<br />
depended primarily on whatsapp (baseline), But in midterm 27% <strong>of</strong> the HHs were using<br />
FarmPrecise, followed by youtube, whatsapp, facebook and other mobile applications.<br />
Season<br />
Perceived benefits <strong>of</strong> FarmPrecise advisories<br />
Climate-related avoided<br />
loss (per acre)<br />
HHs<br />
No <strong>of</strong><br />
crops<br />
Amount<br />
(Rs)<br />
Avg. input cost saved<br />
(per acre)<br />
HHs<br />
No <strong>of</strong><br />
crops<br />
Amount<br />
(Rs)<br />
Avg. productivity<br />
increased (per acre)<br />
809 | Page Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts<br />
HHs<br />
No <strong>of</strong><br />
crops<br />
Produ<br />
ction<br />
(Qt)<br />
Perennial 5 6 1675.0 5 6 3908.3 4 5 2.9<br />
Kharif 53 81 2909.7 51 78 1995.8 51 76 1.4<br />
Rabi 33 43 2514.4 32 41 1584.8 32 41 1.7<br />
Total/ 56 130 2366.4 55 125 2496.3 55 122 2.0<br />
average<br />
Source: Sampled household survey Dec-2017 and Dec-2021<br />
Perceived benefits by adopting FarmPrecise advisories indicate that 56 households have<br />
avoided climate-related losses on an average <strong>of</strong> Rs 2366 per acre as seen in the table.<br />
Besides, 55 users also saved Rs 2496 per acre on various agricultural input costs. In<br />
addition, 55 users have reported an increase in average crop productivity <strong>of</strong> up to 2 quintals<br />
per acre. The features like real-time weather information, weather-based crop-specific<br />
advisories, updated market rates, and on-time support from the community forum <strong>of</strong> the<br />
FarmPrecise app helped in increasing crop productivity, saving input costs, and avoiding
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
climate-related crop losses. The adoption <strong>of</strong> FarmPrecise advisories positively impacts crop<br />
production compared with the business-as-usual respondents. The productivity <strong>of</strong> cotton,<br />
maize, and paddy was increased by 5.4, 10, and 2.8%, respectively, as compared to the<br />
business-as-usual farmers. At the same time, the productivity <strong>of</strong> rabi crops like wheat, onion,<br />
and maize increased by 13.0, 10.6, and 32.7%, respectively, compared to the control.<br />
Overall, the crop productivity <strong>of</strong> FarmPrecise users (treatment group) increased by 5.7%<br />
more than that <strong>of</strong> the business-as-usual farmer (control group).<br />
Productivity (Qt/ acre)<br />
20.0<br />
18.0<br />
16.0<br />
14.0<br />
12.0<br />
10.0<br />
8.0<br />
6.0<br />
4.0<br />
2.0<br />
0.0<br />
9.4<br />
9.9<br />
6.9<br />
7.1<br />
16.9<br />
18.6<br />
14.1<br />
14.6<br />
6.4<br />
6.6<br />
Business as usual farmer<br />
3.6<br />
2.9<br />
8.5 (MT)<br />
8.1 (MT)<br />
9.9<br />
11.3<br />
6.2<br />
6.1<br />
FarmPrecise user<br />
8.7 (MT)<br />
9.7 (MT)<br />
Cotton<br />
Soybean<br />
Maize<br />
6.0<br />
6.8<br />
13.4<br />
Paddy<br />
18.6<br />
Pearl millet<br />
Green gram<br />
Onion (Tonne)<br />
Wheat<br />
Chickpea<br />
Onion (Tonne)<br />
Sorghum<br />
Maize<br />
Kharif<br />
Rabi<br />
Conclusion<br />
The productivity difference between farm precise users and business as usual farmers<br />
The study findings concluded that the features <strong>of</strong> the FarmPrecise app, like weather<br />
forecasts, weather-based farm-specific crop advisories, community forums, and mandi<br />
prices, are most commonly used by farmers. The FarmPrecise app was successful in<br />
delivering more reliable and timely information to farmers and had the potential to improve<br />
the effectiveness <strong>of</strong> AAS significantly and enhance resilient farm income.<br />
References<br />
Lybbert, Travis J., and Daniel, A., Sumner. 2012. Agricultural Technologies for Climate<br />
Change in Developing Countries: Policy Options for Innovation and Technology<br />
Diffusion. Food Policy 37(1): 114–23.<br />
Wang, Huijun et al. 2022. “Predicting Climate Anomalies: A Real Challenge.” Atmospheric<br />
and Oceanic Science Letters 15(1): 100115.<br />
Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts<br />
810 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
T6-06R-1237<br />
Institutional Interventions for Enhancing Productivity in Rainfed<br />
Agriculture<br />
C.N. Anshida Beevi * , G. Nirmala, Jagriti Rohit, K. Nagasree, K. Ravi Shankar and<br />
V.K. Singh<br />
ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
* anshida.cn@icar.gov.in<br />
Rainfed areas assume a special significance in terms <strong>of</strong> agricultural production and livelihood<br />
for millions <strong>of</strong> households in India. The term rainfed agriculture is defined as regions where<br />
crops are predominantly dependent on rainfall with some support from groundwater. Rainfed<br />
areas in India are highly diverse, ranging from resource-rich areas with huge potential to<br />
resource-constrained areas with a number <strong>of</strong> challenges. Rainfed agriculture is mainly affected<br />
by intermittent dry spells during the cropping season particularly at critical crop growth stages<br />
coinciding with the terminal growth stage. Rainfall is a truly random factor in the rainfed<br />
production system and its variation is highly uncertain. In recent decades, traditional<br />
subsistence farming is also moving towards the cultivation <strong>of</strong> commercial or cash crops. As a<br />
result, these regions are facing severe constraints in terms <strong>of</strong> resource, institutional and policy<br />
constraints. A paradigm shift in rainfed agriculture can be achieved by technological<br />
interventions coupled with innovative extension strategies. Over the past decades, various<br />
organizations including both international and national research organizations like ICRISAT,<br />
CRIDA, CAZRI, etc., and Government <strong>of</strong> India initiatives such as the National Mission for<br />
Sustainable Agriculture, Pradhan Mantri Krishi Sinchai Yojana, etc, are working in this<br />
direction. This article explains about the initiatives in detail to understand the present scenario.<br />
National Mission for Sustainable Agriculture<br />
Indian agriculture remains predominantly rainfed covering about 60% <strong>of</strong> the country’s net<br />
sown area and accounting for 40% <strong>of</strong> the total food production. Thus, the conservation <strong>of</strong><br />
natural resources in conjunction with the development <strong>of</strong> rainfed agriculture holds the key to<br />
meeting increasing demands for food grain in the country. Towards this end, National Mission<br />
for Sustainable Agriculture (NMSA) has been formulated. NMSA will cater to key dimensions<br />
<strong>of</strong> ‘Water use efficiency’, ‘Nutrient Management’, and ‘Livelihood diversification’ through the<br />
adoption <strong>of</strong> sustainable development pathways by progressively shifting to environmentally<br />
friendly technologies, adoption <strong>of</strong> energy-efficient equipment, conservation <strong>of</strong> natural<br />
resources, integrated farming, etc. Besides, NMSA aims at promoting location-specific<br />
improved agronomic practices through soil health management, enhanced water use efficiency,<br />
judicious use <strong>of</strong> chemicals, crop diversification, progressive adoption <strong>of</strong> crop-livestock farming<br />
systems, and integrated approaches like crop-sericulture, agro-forestry, fish farming, etc.<br />
811 | Page Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
NMSA has the following four (4) major programme components or activities:<br />
1. Rainfed Area Development (RAD)<br />
2. On-Farm Water Management (OFWM)<br />
3. Soil Health Management (SHM)<br />
4. Climate Change and Sustainable Agriculture: Monitoring, Modelling, and Networking<br />
(CCSAMMN)<br />
State-wise Beneficiary Count under RAD 2021-22<br />
State Total beneficiary State Total beneficiary<br />
Assam 86 Rajasthan 46<br />
Chhattisgarh 569 Tamil Nadu 8167<br />
Gujarat 2491 Telangana 58<br />
Himachal Pradesh 1535 UP 1170<br />
Karnataka 1609 Uttarakhand 525<br />
Mizoram 60 West Bengal 25<br />
Odisha 4432 Total 20773<br />
(Source: MoAFW, GoI)<br />
Pradhan Mantri Krishi Sinchai Yojana<br />
The government <strong>of</strong> India is committed to accord high priority to water conservation and its<br />
management. To this effect, Pradhan Mantri Krishi Sinchai Yojana (PMKSY) has been<br />
formulated with the vision <strong>of</strong> extending the coverage <strong>of</strong> irrigation “Har Khet ko Pani” and<br />
improving water use efficiency “More Crop Per Drop” The Cabinet Committee on Economic<br />
Affairs chaired by Hon’ble Prime Minister has accorded approval <strong>of</strong> PMKSY in its meeting<br />
held on 1 st July 2015. The major objective <strong>of</strong> PMKSY is to achieve convergence <strong>of</strong> investments<br />
in irrigation at the field level, expand cultivable area under assured irrigation, improve on-farm<br />
water use efficiency to reduce wastage <strong>of</strong> water, enhance the adoption <strong>of</strong> precision-irrigation<br />
and other water-saving technologies, enhance recharge <strong>of</strong> aquifers and introduce sustainable<br />
water conservation practices by exploring the feasibility <strong>of</strong> reusing treated municipal waste<br />
water for peri-urban agriculture and attract greater private investment in the precision irrigation<br />
system.<br />
PMKSY has been conceived by amalgamating earlier schemes viz. Accelerated Irrigation<br />
Benefit Programme (AIBP) <strong>of</strong> the Ministry <strong>of</strong> Water Resources, River Development & Ganga<br />
Rejuvenation (MoWR, RD&GR), Integrated Watershed Management Programme (IWMP) <strong>of</strong><br />
the Department <strong>of</strong> Land Resources (DoLR) and On Farm Water Management (OFWM) <strong>of</strong><br />
Department <strong>of</strong> Agriculture and Cooperation (DAC). The scheme will be implemented by the<br />
Ministries <strong>of</strong> Agriculture, Water Resources, and Rural Development. Ministry <strong>of</strong> Rural<br />
Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts<br />
812 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Development is mainly to undertake rainwater conservation, construction <strong>of</strong> farm ponds, water<br />
harvesting structures, small check dams, contour bunding, etc.<br />
Area covered under PMKSY 2021-22<br />
Micro Irrigation<br />
Drip<br />
3.58 Lakh ha<br />
Sprinkler<br />
6.57 Lakh ha<br />
Total<br />
10.15 Lakh ha<br />
Other Interventions<br />
Potential created for protective irrigation 0.06 Lakh ha<br />
(Source: MoA&FW, GoI)<br />
Conclusion<br />
Rainfed agriculture is a complex, diverse, and risk-prone activity. However, properly managing<br />
the rainfed areas would help to contribute a larger share in food grain production. Though<br />
rainfed areas have huge potential to contribute a larger share in food production and faster<br />
agricultural growth, it is characterized by low levels <strong>of</strong> productivity and input usage coupled<br />
with weather aberrations due to climate change; resulting in wide variations and instability in<br />
crop yields. In view <strong>of</strong> the growing demand for food grains in the country, the developmental<br />
needs <strong>of</strong> the rainfed regions would be <strong>of</strong> utmost importance to ensure the growth <strong>of</strong> the<br />
agriculture sector in the country.<br />
References<br />
https://pmksy.gov.in/<br />
https://nmsa.dac.gov.in/RptBeneficiarycount.aspx<br />
Sharma, B. R., Rao, K. V., Vittal, K. P. R., & Amarasinghe, U. 2008. Converting rain into<br />
grain: Opportunities for realising the potential rainfed agriculture in India.<br />
In Proceedings National Workshop <strong>of</strong> National River Linking Project <strong>of</strong> India,<br />
International Water Management Institute, Colombo (pp. 239-252).<br />
813 | Page Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
T6-07R-1214<br />
Perceived Attributes Leading to the Adoption <strong>of</strong> Agromet Advisories by<br />
Dryland Farmers in India<br />
Jagriti Rohit, G Nirmala, Anshida Beevi, K Nagasree, S. K Bal, K Ravi Shankar,<br />
B.M.K Raju and V. K Singh<br />
ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
The importance <strong>of</strong> Agromet advisories services (AAS) as a tool to address the risk associated<br />
in agriculture has increased to many folds in recent years. AAS is a climate resilient technology<br />
which provides the valuable information about all agricultural operations from land preparation<br />
sowing to harvest based on weather forecasting. The emerging ability to provide timely, skillful<br />
weather forecasts <strong>of</strong>fers the potential to reduce human vulnerability to weather vagaries<br />
(Hansen, 2002). Relevant weather forecast not only helps for efficient management <strong>of</strong> farm<br />
resources and also helps for increasing crop yields and farm income. Hence, improved microlevel<br />
weather based Agromet Advisory Service (AAS) greatly helps farming community to<br />
take advantage <strong>of</strong> favourable weather and mitigate the impacts <strong>of</strong> external weather situations.<br />
Characteristic <strong>of</strong> a technology or attribute <strong>of</strong> an innovation is a precondition for adoption. In<br />
Rogers’ seminal synthesis on the adoption <strong>of</strong> innovations, innovation attributes are identified<br />
as having a pr<strong>of</strong>ound impact on farmers’ adaptive decisions (Rogers 2003). Agricultural studies<br />
have also demonstrated the importance <strong>of</strong> the perceived attributes <strong>of</strong> innovation in relation to<br />
its adoption (Tey et al 2014)<br />
Methodology<br />
For Under National Innovation in climate resilient agriculture (NICRA), Krishi Vigyan<br />
Kendras are providing AAS to farmers. Hence, Kurnool district, Andhra Pradesh was selected<br />
purposively as KVK Banaganapalli was giving AAS to farmers in nearby villages since<br />
inception <strong>of</strong> NICRA. Three villages namely Yagantipalle, Mirapur and Chirolokuttur receiving<br />
AAS were selected purposively for the study. A pilot study was undertaken which led to the<br />
modification <strong>of</strong> sampling plan. The farmers were categorized into two groups viz farmers in<br />
direct contact with KVK and receiving the message and farmers who received the message<br />
from the directly contacted farmers via in whatsapp group. The farmers from both the groups<br />
were selected following the proportionate random sampling.<br />
The total numbers <strong>of</strong> respondents for the study was 180. Data was collected using structured<br />
questionnaire. In Rogers’ theory <strong>of</strong> diffusion <strong>of</strong> innovation, there are five common attributes<br />
<strong>of</strong> innovations: relative advantage, complexity, compatibility, observability, and trialability.<br />
The term “relative advantage” refers to the extent to which new ideas, behaviours, and objects<br />
are viewed as more innovative and superior to the innovations they are replacing. Additional<br />
Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts<br />
814 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
relative advantages include timesaving, reduction <strong>of</strong> discomfort, social prestige, and<br />
immediacy <strong>of</strong> the benefits from the innovation. Compatibility is defined as the degree to which<br />
potential adopters perceived the innovation consistent with their existing values and past<br />
experiences. Complexity is described as the degree to which potential users perceived the<br />
innovation as relatively difficult to comprehend and use. Trialability is characterised by “the<br />
degree to which an innovation may be experimented with on a limited basis”.<br />
Results<br />
The results <strong>of</strong> the study as shown in table 1. The results show that significant difference was<br />
observed with respect to ease <strong>of</strong> use (Chi square=.027) and result demonstrability (chi<br />
square=.001) at one percent level <strong>of</strong> significance. The farmers were able to implement the<br />
message by themselves and also, they could contact the KVK <strong>of</strong>ficials for any clarifications.<br />
Perceived attributes <strong>of</strong> innovation <strong>of</strong> AAS (district Kurnool, A.P)<br />
Perceived Attributes Total Yagantipalle Mirapuram Chirokuttur Kruskall Wallis<br />
Chi square<br />
m sd m sd m sd m sd<br />
Relative advantage 19.8 1.65 19.3 1.64 19.6 1.43 19.8 1.85 .492<br />
Compatibility 17.8 1.77 18.0 1.77 17.9 1.77 17.3 1.62 .193<br />
Complexity/ease <strong>of</strong> use 17.6 2.44 17.8 2.03 17.9 2.05 16.5 2.88 .027*<br />
Trialability 18.5 1.77 18.6 1.93 18.45 1.90 18.4 1.78 .784<br />
Result demonstrability 18.6 1.96 18.8 1.91 18.3 1.83 17.3 1.75 .001*<br />
*Significant at 1percent level <strong>of</strong> significance<br />
1= Yagantipalle 2= Mirapuram 3= Chirokuttur<br />
Conclusion<br />
Result demonstrability and ease <strong>of</strong> use were the perceived characteristic <strong>of</strong> innovation found to<br />
be significant factor leading to adoption <strong>of</strong> AAS. Extension agencies should take care <strong>of</strong> the<br />
perceived attributes while formulating and implementing the messages.<br />
References<br />
Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion <strong>of</strong> innovations. Free Press. New York, 551.<br />
Hansen, J.W. (2002), Realizing the potential benefits <strong>of</strong> climate perdition to agriculture and<br />
challenges. Agricultural systems 74: 329-330.<br />
Tey, Y. S., Li, E., Bruwer, J., Abdullah, A. M., Brindal, M., Radam, A., ... & Darham, S. (2014).<br />
The relative importance <strong>of</strong> factors influencing the adoption <strong>of</strong> sustainable agricultural<br />
practices: A factor approach for Malaysian vegetable farmers. Sustainability science,<br />
9(1), 17-29.<br />
815 | Page Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
T6-08R-1518<br />
Assessment <strong>of</strong> Pr<strong>of</strong>itability and Sustainability <strong>of</strong> Sunflower as a<br />
Component in Emerging Cropping Systems <strong>of</strong> Northern Karnataka<br />
M.R. Umesh*, U.K. Shanwad, Vikas V. Kulkarni, Vijayakumar N Ghante,<br />
N. Poornima, Ananda, and Anand S. Kamble<br />
University <strong>of</strong> Agricultural Sciences, Raichur-584104 Karnataka, India<br />
*mrumehsagri@gmail.com<br />
Intensifying cropping systems can be achieved by increasing the spatial and temporal<br />
arrangement <strong>of</strong> different compatible crops. Within field temporal heterogeneity can be<br />
achieved by growing several crops in sequences differing in the patterns <strong>of</strong> resource use. In<br />
Northern Karnataka pigeonpea and Bt-cotton are predominant crops. These are increasingly<br />
used as alternative crops to sunflower that dominate irrigated regions <strong>of</strong> Northern Karnataka.<br />
Shift from sunflower (22.6 lakhs ha in 1992 to 2.56 lakhs ha in 2020) to alternate cropping<br />
systems may have significant effect on oil production in the region. To intensify the sunflowerbased<br />
cropping system field trial was conducted with an objective to assess sunflower crop as<br />
a component under crop diversification with new/emerging cropping systems in terms <strong>of</strong><br />
system productivity and pr<strong>of</strong>itability. Sunflower was compared in a yearly sequence with<br />
maize, bajra and soybean compared with sunflower-chickpea system.<br />
Methodology<br />
A 3-year field experiment was conducted in fixed plots <strong>of</strong> medium to deep Vertisols at<br />
University <strong>of</strong> Agriculture Sciences, Raichur Karnataka. During rainy season maize hybrid (NK<br />
6240), bajra (cv. MBP-2) and soybean (DSb-21) were grown in addition to sunflower hybrid<br />
(RSFH-1887) whereas in rabi, sunflower and chickpea (cv. JG-11) were grown in undisturbed<br />
plots. For rabi crops, chemical fertilizers were applied as per soil test crop response (STCR)<br />
target yield @3 t/ha, 50% STCR and compared with regional fertilizer recommendation (RDF)<br />
(90:90:60 kg NPK/ha). Soil smaples were analysed for NPK status after harvest <strong>of</strong> Kharif crops.<br />
Based on sol test values STCR equation adopted for rabi sunflower is FN= 8.38T-0.57 SN;<br />
FP2O5= 8.05T-6.00 SP2O5; FK2O= 9.87 T-0.47 SK2O and STCR target yield equation for<br />
chickpea FN = 5.35T-0.22 SN- 0.098ON; FP2O5 =3.71T-1.16 SP- 0.15OP; FK2O = 8.32T-0.43<br />
SK- 0.22OK wherein target yield (T) <strong>of</strong> 30 q/ha is common for both the crops. In all the years,<br />
Kharif crops were sown in July and rabi crops were sown in October/November after harvest<br />
<strong>of</strong> kharif crops.<br />
Results<br />
The results <strong>of</strong> the study has showed that maize-sunflower system was out yielded in terms <strong>of</strong><br />
system sunflower crop equivalent yield (4355 kg/ha), system returns (Rs. 194713/ha) and<br />
Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts<br />
816 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
overall benefit cost ratio (2.93) as compared to rest <strong>of</strong> the cropping sequences and existing<br />
sunflower-chickpea system (Table 1). It also recorded greater sustainable yield index (0.93)<br />
and partial factor productivity. Application <strong>of</strong> fertilizers based on STCR to boost up the system<br />
productivity (3268 kg/ha) and sustainable yield index (51.2) over RDF <strong>of</strong> the region. It can be<br />
concluded that yearly sequence <strong>of</strong> maize-sunflower was found remunerative and potential<br />
alternative double cropping system over existing sunflower-chickpea system in Vertisols <strong>of</strong><br />
Northern Karnataka.<br />
Conclusion<br />
Over 3-years, among Kharif crops, maize has produced higher grain yield in terms <strong>of</strong> sunflower<br />
equivalent yield (SEY). For rabi sunflower and chickpea application <strong>of</strong> fertilizers based on<br />
100% STCR@3t/ha target recorded higher SEY. Maize-sunflower sequence gave higher<br />
system SEY (4355 kg ha -1 ) and economic returns (Rs.128400 ha -1 ) over existing sunflowerchickpea<br />
and other systems. It was concluded that maize- sunflower system was greater<br />
productive with application <strong>of</strong> fertilizers based on STCR 100% for rabi crops.<br />
Yield and economics <strong>of</strong> kharif and rabi crops in sunflower-based cropping systems<br />
(Data is average <strong>of</strong> 3 years)<br />
Cropping<br />
system 'C'<br />
Kharif<br />
(kg/ha)<br />
Cropping system (C)<br />
Kharif<br />
SEY<br />
(kg/ha)<br />
Rabi<br />
(kg/ha)<br />
Rabi<br />
SEY<br />
(kg/ha)<br />
System<br />
SEY<br />
(kg/ha)<br />
GR<br />
(Rs./ha)<br />
NR<br />
(Rs./ha)<br />
COC<br />
(Rs./ha)<br />
B:C<br />
ratio<br />
Bajra- SF 1243 490 1650 1650 2140 20075 8075 12000 1.67 0.47<br />
Maize-SF 8771 2589 1701 1701 4290 106129 68629 37500 2.83 0.93<br />
Soybean-<br />
SF<br />
SF-<br />
Chickpea<br />
879 911 1830 1830 2741 37358 11358 26000 1.44 0.53<br />
1612 1612 1360 1659 3271 66092 39272 26820 2.46 0.69<br />
S.Em.+ 72.6 20.4 23 77.9 - - - -<br />
CD @ 5% 256.3 71.82 81.1 274.8 - - - -<br />
Fertilizer levels (F)<br />
RDF - 1386 1661 1603 3120 67650 40740 26820 2.52 0.49<br />
STCR<br />
@3t/ha<br />
- 1309 1867 1959 3268 69741 42921 26820 2.63 0.51<br />
50% STCR - 1506 1377 1437 2943 75030 48210 26820 2.86 0.48<br />
S.Em+ 49.7 25.1 26.1 56.8<br />
CD @5% 150.3 76 79 171.8 - - - -<br />
F x C NS NS NS NS - - - -<br />
SEY- Sunflower equivalent yield; SYI- Sustainable yield index; GR- Gross returns; NR- Net Returns; COC-<br />
Cost <strong>of</strong> cultivation; SF- Sunflower<br />
SYI<br />
817 | Page Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts<br />
T6-09R-1359<br />
Integrated Farming System: A Scientific Approach Towards Doubling<br />
Farmers Income<br />
Keshav Mehra, Durga Singh, S.P. Singh and Mukesh Choudhary<br />
Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Bikaner-I Swami Keshwanand Rajasthan Agricultural University, Bikaner<br />
Agriculture is the most significant source <strong>of</strong> income and the backbone <strong>of</strong> Indian economy. India<br />
is a global agricultural powerhouse. It is the world’s largest producer <strong>of</strong> milk, pulses and spices<br />
and has the world’s largest cattle herd (buffaloes), as well as the largest area under wheat, rice<br />
and cotton. The majority <strong>of</strong> farming communities follow traditional farming systems which<br />
provides less pr<strong>of</strong>it as compared to Integrated Farming System (IFS). Integrated farming<br />
system is a holistic approach that involves crop cultivation, dairy, poultry, fishery, mushroom<br />
cultivation, agro-forestry, piggery, beekeeping, vegetable and fruit production, use <strong>of</strong><br />
renewable energy source (Solar energy, Biogas) etc. An IFS model is developed at Krishi<br />
Vigyan Kendra, Bikaner to promote the IFS in the arid and semi-arid regions <strong>of</strong> Rajasthan.<br />
Two ha area is devoted under the different units like agriculture (pearlmillet and wheat),<br />
horticulture (Vegetable and Fruits), animal (Cow and goat), azolla and vermicompost unit etc.<br />
Pomegranate, lemon, custard apple, jamun and khirani orchards were established in 0.5 ha.<br />
area. In the initial year it is less pr<strong>of</strong>itable due to the time taken by the fruit plants to bear the<br />
fruits. Kadaknath breed <strong>of</strong> poultry have a good market demand after the pandemic <strong>of</strong> COVID-<br />
19, which also provided good income to the KVK. Sirohi is a dual-purpose goat breed which<br />
is popular for their weight gain and lactation even under poor quality rearing conditions. The<br />
animals are resistant to major diseases and are easily adaptable to different climatic conditions<br />
specially in hot places. Cow dung and goat manure were utilized to prepare the vermicompost.<br />
Azolla is used as feed <strong>of</strong> cow and goat to increase the milk production. In IFS model all<br />
resources are managed efficiently in such a manner that waste output <strong>of</strong> one enterprise serves<br />
as a input for another.<br />
T6-10R-1177<br />
Impact <strong>of</strong> Cluster Field Demonstrations in Groundnut Productivity<br />
Enhancement under Rainfed Alfisols <strong>of</strong> YSR District, Andhra Pradesh<br />
D.V. Srinivasulu, K. Ravi Kumar, S. Ramalakshmi Devi and A. Veeraiah<br />
KrishiVigyan Kendra, Utukur, Kadapa, YSR District,<br />
Acharya N.G.Ranga Agricultural University, A.P.-516003<br />
Among the oil seeds groundnut (Arachis hypogea L.,) is a major oilseed crop <strong>of</strong> India with<br />
nearly 80% <strong>of</strong> the annual acreage (41.6 lakh ha) and production (83.8 lakh tonnes) coming<br />
from kharif crop (June-October) under rainfed conditions (Anonymous, 2020). In Andhra<br />
818 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Pradesh, the crop is cultivated in 6.8 lakhs hectares during kharif with an average production<br />
and productivity <strong>of</strong> 3.3 lakh tonnes and 484 kg ha -1 , respectively. Y.S.R Kadapa district is one<br />
<strong>of</strong> the potential districts for groundnut in Andhra Pradesh where the groundnut area is decreased<br />
from 44,179 ha during 2012-13to 25,315 ha during 2017-18. There was also wide fluctuation<br />
in the groundnut productivity <strong>of</strong> the district i.e between 252 to 1560 kg ha -1 during the last seven<br />
years.<br />
In order to address the production constraints and achieve the sustainable yields in groundnut,<br />
along with the objective <strong>of</strong> adopting Best Management Practices (BMP), Cluster Frontline<br />
Demonstrations (CFLDs) in groundnut were demonstrated among the farmers’ fields by the<br />
scientists <strong>of</strong> KrishiVigyan Kendra, Utukur under the scheme <strong>of</strong> National Food Security Mission<br />
(NFSM), Ministry <strong>of</strong> Agriculture, GoI through ICAR-ATARI-Zone-Vin selective mandals <strong>of</strong><br />
YSR Kadapa district.<br />
Methodology<br />
CFLDs in groundnut were organized by KVK, Utukur during kharif season in rainfed alfisols<br />
<strong>of</strong> Lakkireddipalli and Chinnamandem mandals <strong>of</strong> Y.S.R. Kadapa district (at present<br />
Annamayya district) <strong>of</strong> Andhra Pradesh during 2017-18 and 2018-19, respectively. An area <strong>of</strong><br />
20 ha in42farm holding/demonstration sites were covered. The actual rainfall received by<br />
Lakkireddipalli and Chinnamandem mandals during South West monsoon period is 301.0 mm<br />
and 318.5 mm as against normal rainfall <strong>of</strong> 404.0 mm during the study years. Under this<br />
programme, each demonstration site implemented the BMP’s recommended by ANGRAU like<br />
1) Improved seed: groundnut var .dharani, 2) Application <strong>of</strong> bi<strong>of</strong>ertilizers viz. Rhizobium, PSB<br />
and KSB@ 5 kg ha -1 3)Soil test based fertilizer recommendation,4) Application <strong>of</strong> Gypsum @<br />
500 kg ha -1 at flowering stage 5) Integrated Pest Management (IPM): Seed treatment with<br />
Imidachloprid 600 FS @ 2 ml + 4 L water per kg seed, border cropping with Bajra/Jowar,<br />
spraying <strong>of</strong> neem oil (1500 ppm) at 20-30 DAS, erection <strong>of</strong> pheromone traps @ 20 no’s ha -1 ,<br />
erection <strong>of</strong> bird perches @ 20 no’s ha -1 and judicious use <strong>of</strong> pesticides 6) Implementation <strong>of</strong><br />
Resource Conservation Technologies (RCT’s)/tools: Sub soiling with sub soiler at an interval<br />
<strong>of</strong> 1.0 m and compartmental bunding with size <strong>of</strong> 40 m 2 (8 m x 5m) for insitu rain water<br />
conservation and using seed to seed mechanization7) Using drip/sprinkler system/rain guns for<br />
life saving irrigation during dry spells at critical stages8) Spraying <strong>of</strong> 2 per cent Urea to mitigate<br />
dry spell were demonstrated in farmer’s fields (demo plots) against farmer’s<br />
practice(check)which include:(Seed from the local vendors/home grown with low yield<br />
potential and susceptibility to diseases (eg. K-6/mixtures), application <strong>of</strong> complex fertilizers,<br />
no adoption <strong>of</strong> resource conserving techniques/insitu rain water conservation practices, no<br />
drought management and IPM practices). Under demonstration plot, improved groundnut var.<br />
dharani and bio-fertilizers were given to the farmers by the KVK.<br />
819 | Page Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
The crop was sown during 2 nd F.N <strong>of</strong> June to 1 st F.N <strong>of</strong> July and harvested at maturity during<br />
1 st fortnight <strong>of</strong> October in both the years. The method demonstrations were conducted on BMP<br />
sat fields <strong>of</strong> beneficiary farmers. The yield data recorded from 5m × 5m plot in demonstration<br />
and farmers’ practice and field days at harvest were conducted. The data on yield and<br />
economics were tabulated and analyzed year wise. Further, from the yield data in the study<br />
area extension gap, technology gap and technology index were worked out using the following<br />
formulae (Samui et al., 2000).<br />
Results<br />
In demonstration plots the average pod yield <strong>of</strong> dharani variety was 818 kg ha -1 (ranged from<br />
700 to 1060 kg ha -1 ) and 1355 kg ha -1 (ranged from 1254 to 1545 kg ha -1 ) during 2017-18 and<br />
2018-19, respectively (Table). The technological interventions have resulted in an increase in<br />
yield by 22.1 and 8.7 per cent, respectively during 2017-18 and 2018-19 over farmers practice.<br />
These results are in similarity with the results reported by Yogesh et al. (2018) in groundnut<br />
and Mohan et al. (2019) in Cluster FLDs in sunflower. From the two years data, the mean cost<br />
incurred for implementation <strong>of</strong> BMP’s in demonstration plot was higher by Rs.1375/- ha -<br />
1<br />
compared to farmers practice which resulted in 24.0 percent higher net returns per hectare<br />
with mean B:C ratio <strong>of</strong> 1.99 in demonstration plot.<br />
Yield, extension gap, technology gap and technology index <strong>of</strong> demonstration and farmer<br />
practice ingroundnut cluster FLDs in YSR district, A.P.<br />
2017-18 2018-19<br />
Demo<br />
practice<br />
Farmer<br />
Practice<br />
Demo<br />
practice<br />
Area (ha) 10 10<br />
No. <strong>of</strong> Demonstrations 17 25<br />
Farmer<br />
Practice<br />
Mean Yield (kg ha -1) 818 670 1355 1247<br />
t stat 4.14* 3.97*<br />
Std. Deviation 113 95 99 93<br />
Per cent increase over farmer’s practice 22.1 8.7<br />
Potential yield (kg ha -1 ) 1600 1600<br />
Extension gap (kg ha -1 ) 148 108<br />
Technology gap (kg ha -1 ) 782 245<br />
Technology index (%) 48.9 15.3<br />
*Significant at P = 0.05<br />
Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts<br />
820 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
₹<br />
90000<br />
80000<br />
70000<br />
60000<br />
50000<br />
40000<br />
30000<br />
20000<br />
10000<br />
0<br />
2.31<br />
2.04<br />
1.84<br />
1.74<br />
Demo FP Demo FP<br />
2.50<br />
2.00<br />
1.50<br />
1.00<br />
0.50<br />
0.00<br />
Cost <strong>of</strong><br />
cultivation<br />
Gross returns<br />
Net returns<br />
B : C Ratio<br />
2017-18 2018-19<br />
Year<br />
Economics <strong>of</strong> demonstration Vs farmers’ practice in groundnut Cluster FLDs in YSR District<br />
The technology gap ranged between 782 kg ha -1 to 245 kg ha -1 which further indicates that<br />
there is greater scope <strong>of</strong> productivity enhancement in subsequent years through transfer <strong>of</strong><br />
BMPs from research stations to farmers fields. The technology index which indicates the extent<br />
<strong>of</strong> feasibility <strong>of</strong> improved technology <strong>of</strong> the demonstrations ranged from lowest (15.3 per cent)<br />
during 2018-19 to highest (48.9 per cent) during 2017-18 with average technology index <strong>of</strong><br />
32.1 per cent. The variations might be attributed to variations in level <strong>of</strong> soil nutrients, soil<br />
moisture availability, incidence <strong>of</strong> pests and diseases, integrated nutrient, pest and disease<br />
management strategies in the study area.<br />
Conclusion<br />
The CFLDs conducted by KVK enhanced the yield <strong>of</strong> groundnut vertically and ensured rapid<br />
spread <strong>of</strong> recommended technologies <strong>of</strong> groundnut production horizontally by implementation<br />
<strong>of</strong> various extension activities like training programmes, field days, exposure visits organized<br />
in farmer’s field. The CFLDs made a positive impact on yield <strong>of</strong> groundnut by 15.4 per cent.<br />
It was observed that the potential yield <strong>of</strong> groundnut var. dharani can be achieved by imparting<br />
scientific knowledge to the farmers on BMPs, providing the quality need-based inputs and their<br />
proper utilization. The recipient farmers <strong>of</strong> CFLD also play an important role as source <strong>of</strong><br />
information on BPs and quality seeds for wider dissemination <strong>of</strong> the improved varieties <strong>of</strong><br />
groundnut for other nearby farmers.<br />
References<br />
Anonymous 2020. Area, Production and Yield <strong>of</strong> oilseed crops from 2009-10 to 2019-20.<br />
Directorate <strong>of</strong> Economics & Statistics, Ministry <strong>of</strong> Agriculture & Farmers Welfare,<br />
Government <strong>of</strong> India, New Delhi.<br />
MadakaMadhan Mohan., Ramalakshmi Devi, S. Veeraiah, A. 2019. Demonstration <strong>of</strong> BMP’s<br />
in sunflower for sustainable yields under black soil tracts <strong>of</strong> Rayalaseema region <strong>of</strong><br />
Andhra Pradesh, India. Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. Appl. Sci., 8(09): 2894-2901.<br />
821 | Page Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Samui, S. K., Moitra, S., Ray, D., Mandal, A.K., Saha, D. 2000. Evaluation <strong>of</strong> frontline<br />
demonstration on groundnut. J. Indian Soc. Costal Agric. Res., 18: 180-183.<br />
Yogesh D. Pawar, Sachin H. Malve, F. K. Chaudhary, UmeshDobariya, G. J. Patel, 2018.Yield<br />
gap analysis <strong>of</strong> groundnut through cluster front line demonstration under north Gujarat<br />
condition. Multilogic Sci.,7(25): 177-179.<br />
T6-11P-1004<br />
Drought Mitigation <strong>of</strong> Sorghum by Spraying <strong>of</strong> Foliar Nutrients on yield<br />
and Economics under Dry Spell Situation for Southern Agroclimatic Zone<br />
<strong>of</strong> Tamil Nadu<br />
K. Baskar 1 *, V. Sanjivkumar 2 , S. Manoharan 3 , M. Manikandan 4 , G. Guru 5 , and<br />
G. Ravindrachary 6<br />
1,2,3,4,5 ICAR-AICRP on Dryland Agriculture, Agricultural Research Station, Kovilpatti - 628501,<br />
Tamil Nadu state. 6 Project Coordinator, ICAR-All India Co-ordinated Research Project on Dryland<br />
Agriculture, CRIDA, Hyderabad, Telangana state.<br />
*kbaskartnau@gmail.com<br />
In India around 65-70 % <strong>of</strong> cultivated lands comes under dryland and they contributing about<br />
45 % <strong>of</strong> nations food grain production. Most <strong>of</strong> the crops under millets (>95%), oilseeds (90%)<br />
and pulses 90-95% are cultivated on these lands with low productivity which could be<br />
attributed to inadequate rainfall, poor soil fertility, occurrence <strong>of</strong> dry spells, drought during<br />
cropping season, high temperature, more PET than rainfall etc. Of these drought at critical<br />
period <strong>of</strong> cropping season drastically reduces the crop yield. Sorghum (Sorghum bicolour L.)<br />
is a drought resistance fodder crop.. It is considered promising crop to overcome the fodder<br />
shortages because <strong>of</strong> it’s short duration, drought tolerance, well adaptiveness to arid and semiarid<br />
regions. Moisture and nutrition affect succulence, dry matter, crude protein and other<br />
quality parameters <strong>of</strong> fodder. Foliar application <strong>of</strong> nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium could<br />
increase crop productivity many folds under moisture stress condition. Efficacy <strong>of</strong> foliar<br />
fertilization <strong>of</strong> nitrogen is seven times more than soil application under drought conditions due<br />
to less denitrification and leaching losses. The uptake <strong>of</strong> necessary elements becomes difficult<br />
for plants when fertilizers are applied to soil due to the formation <strong>of</strong> certain soil complexes. To<br />
overcome these issues macro and micro nutrients are applied at critical stages <strong>of</strong> the crops<br />
under dryland situation.<br />
Methodology<br />
A field experiment was conducted at black soil farm <strong>of</strong> AICRPDA Kovilpatti main centre,<br />
Agricultural Research Station, Kovilpatti, Tamil Nadu under dryland situation from 2017-‘20<br />
in rabi season to study the effect <strong>of</strong> foliar application <strong>of</strong> nutrients sprayed during moisture<br />
Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts<br />
822 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
stress condition in rainfed sorghum. The soil at the experimental was clayey in texture and<br />
belongs to Kovilpatti Soil Series (Typic Chromusterts). The soil has sub angular blocky<br />
structure with pH generally neutral to a tendency towards alkalinity at lower depths (7.8 to 8.2)<br />
and saline in nature. The soil bulk density varied from 1.20 to 1.35 kg m -3 with the field capacity<br />
<strong>of</strong> 35 per cent and permanent wilting point <strong>of</strong> 14 per cent (Sunflower as an indicator plant).<br />
This experiment was conducted in split plot design replicated thrice under rainfed situation.<br />
The available nutrient status <strong>of</strong> the soil was low in available nitrogen (134.4kg ha -1 ), low to<br />
medium in available phosphorus (12.1 kg ha -1 ), high in available potassium status (395 kg ha -<br />
1<br />
) and low in available zinc (1.2 ppm). The treatment comprised <strong>of</strong> main plots viz., M1-Foliar<br />
spray during dry spell, M 2 - Foliar spray after relieving <strong>of</strong> stress/dry spell (with favorable soil<br />
moisture) and seven subplots <strong>of</strong> foliar nutrients viz., S 1-Urea @ 1%, S 2-Urea @ 2%, S 3-Water<br />
soluble complex fertilizer (19:19:19) @ 0.5%, S4-Water soluble complex fertilizer (19:19:19)<br />
@ 0.5% + recommended dose <strong>of</strong> micronutrient for foliar spray (zinc), S 5-ZnSO 4 @ 0.5%, S 6-<br />
Water spray, S7-Control (no spray <strong>of</strong> any material/water). Foliar application <strong>of</strong> plant nutrients<br />
are applied as per the treatment schedule under rainfed vertisols.<br />
Effect <strong>of</strong> foliar plant fertilization <strong>of</strong> different chemicals on yield and economics <strong>of</strong><br />
rainfed sorghum (K 12)<br />
Treatments Yield (kg/ha) Cost <strong>of</strong><br />
B:C<br />
Mainplot:<br />
Grain yield<br />
Stover<br />
yield<br />
cultivation<br />
(Rs./ha)<br />
Net returns<br />
(Rs./ha)<br />
M 1 1339 1975 19300 9455 1.49<br />
M 2 1235 1748 19150 7298 1.38<br />
SEd 30.0 45.5<br />
CD (0.05) 62.0 93.5<br />
Sub plot:<br />
Results<br />
T 1 1172 1642 20200 4882 1.24<br />
T 2 1235 1811 20900 5611 1.27<br />
T 3 1378 2288 21100 8748 1.42<br />
T 4 1343 1948 21825 6983 1.32<br />
T 5 1294 1722 20225 7377 1.36<br />
T 6 1202 1574 19700 5914 1.30<br />
T 7 1052 1329 19500 2869 1.15<br />
SEd 31.5 81.2<br />
CD (0.05) 65.0 165.1<br />
In Vertisols under rainfed situation different foliar plant nutrients were applied during stress<br />
and after relieving stress condition. Among the foliar sprays, application <strong>of</strong> water soluble<br />
823 | Page Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
complex fertilizer (19:19:19) @ 0.5% applied during the dryspell condition registered the<br />
highest sorghum grain yield (1378 kg ha -1 ), stover yield (2288 kg ha -1 ), net returns (8748 kg<br />
ha -1 ) and BC ratio (1.42) in rainfed sorghum (K 12) and it was followed by the treatment<br />
sprayed with water soluble complex fertilizer (19:19:19) @ 0.5% + recommended dose <strong>of</strong><br />
micronutrient for foliar spray (ZnSO 4 @ 0.5%) respectively (Table 1.).<br />
The combined fertilizer application through foliar plant nutrition increased yield attributes and<br />
yield <strong>of</strong> millets. This might be due to the supplementation <strong>of</strong> plants with three major and<br />
micronutrients together and these elements enhancing most <strong>of</strong> the metabolic processes. The<br />
supplementation <strong>of</strong> nitrogen increased the protein formation, phosphorous in the formation <strong>of</strong><br />
nucleic acids and energy compounds while potassium influenced the water adjustment and<br />
carbohydrate transportation. The findings corroborated with the findings <strong>of</strong> Emam and<br />
Zavorakh, (2004) and Hussein et al. (2011).<br />
Effect <strong>of</strong> foliar plant fertilization <strong>of</strong> different chemicals on rain water use efficiency (RWUE) <strong>of</strong> rainfed<br />
sorghum (K 12).<br />
During dryspell condition, the plots treated with foliar application <strong>of</strong> water-soluble complex<br />
fertilizer (19:19:19) @ 0.5% applied during the dryspell condition recorded higher rainwater<br />
use efficiency (2.84 kg/ha-mm) and it was followed by the treatment applied with water soluble<br />
complex fertilizer (19:19:19) @ 0.5% + recommended dose <strong>of</strong> micronutrient for foliar spray<br />
(ZnSO4 @ 0.5%), when compared to all other foliar treatments as in the figure.<br />
Conclusion<br />
It can be concluded that the foliar application <strong>of</strong> water-soluble complex fertilizer (19:19:19) @<br />
0.5 % registered higher grain and stover yields, net returns, BC ratio and rain water use<br />
efficiency during the dryspell condition in rainfed sorghum (K 12) under deep black soils<br />
condition <strong>of</strong> Southern zone <strong>of</strong> Tamil Nadu.<br />
Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts<br />
824 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
References<br />
Emam, A. and M. Zavareh. 2004. Drought tolerance in plants (Analysis <strong>of</strong> the physiological<br />
and molecular biology) (Translation). University publishing centre. Page. 75.<br />
Hussain, F., A.U. Malik, M.A. Haji and A.L. Malghani. 2011. Growth and yield response <strong>of</strong><br />
two cultivars <strong>of</strong> mungbean (Vigna radiata L.) to different potassium levels. The J. Ani.,<br />
Plant Sci., 21(3): 622-625.<br />
T6-12P-1018<br />
A Summative Evaluation <strong>of</strong> Technological Interventions in Poultry<br />
Farming<br />
Prabhat Kumar Pankaj, G. Nirmala, K. Ravi Shankar, V.K. Singh and A. Dinesh<br />
ICAR-Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, Hyderabad-500059, Telangana, India<br />
Poultry farming is an important source <strong>of</strong> livelihood for landless and marginal farmers in the<br />
rural area <strong>of</strong> the country. The backyard poultry farming with improved poultry varieties is a<br />
potential tool to alleviate poverty, eradicate malnutrition, generate subsidiary income, empower<br />
women, and provide gainful employment in rural areas <strong>of</strong> the country (Rajkumar et al., 2021).<br />
Women manage most <strong>of</strong> the activities under backyard system like feeding, watering, cleaning,<br />
and selling <strong>of</strong> chickens, and eggs which lead to their empowerment (Pankaj et al., 2019). The<br />
present investigation was carried out to study the impact <strong>of</strong> improved Srinidhi variety <strong>of</strong> chicks,<br />
advisory services, input support and technological interventions on productivity <strong>of</strong> poultry<br />
birds and income <strong>of</strong> farmers in adopted villages <strong>of</strong> Pudurmandal, Vikarabaddistrict <strong>of</strong><br />
Telangana.<br />
Methodology<br />
The present study was conducted in five villages, viz., Gangupally, Medikonda, Pudugurthy,<br />
Rakamcherla and Devenoniguda in Pudur Mandal, Vikarabad under ‘Farmers FIRST’ project<br />
from September, 2018 to October, 2021. Technological interventions were provided in first<br />
three villages and latter two villages acted as control group (Devenoniguda and Rakamcherla).<br />
Farmers were provided constant advisory services, input support and technological (improved<br />
variety as Srinidhi, health, nutrition and management) interventions in treatment group and no<br />
inputs were provided in the control group. Summative evaluation was conducted after one to<br />
three years <strong>of</strong> interventions. Baseline information on six attributes <strong>of</strong> socio-economic pr<strong>of</strong>ile<br />
like age, education, land holding, flock strength, experience in poultry farming and formal<br />
training in poultry farming were collected through semi-structured interview schedule in the<br />
first year before the start <strong>of</strong> intervention. The data were analyzed by Chi-square, paired and<br />
independent t-tests. The logical framework model approach with elements like supply side<br />
(inputs, activities, outputs) and results side (outcomes and final outcomes) were used to finalize<br />
825 | Page Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
the evaluation <strong>of</strong> intervention on different indicators.<br />
Results<br />
The baseline data showed that all the socio-economic attributes were similar in both the groups<br />
<strong>of</strong> poultry farmers. Majority <strong>of</strong> the farmers were illiterate and landless in both the groups.<br />
During the study period, poultry population in the treatment group increased by 44.64% as<br />
compared to 3.73% in control group (Table 1). The net increase in population was 40.95% from<br />
the control with a significant increase (38.49%) in flock size/household in treatment villages.<br />
There was significant improvement in all productive and reproductive traits in treatment group<br />
compared to the control (Table 1). Net impact on number <strong>of</strong> eggs in 52 weeks, egg weight at<br />
52 nd week, body weight at 52 nd week, age at first laying, mortality at 0-5 week were improved<br />
by 7.02, 14.70, 19.44, 9.61, 6.20%, respectively.<br />
Impact <strong>of</strong> interventions on flock size and different production traits <strong>of</strong> poultry<br />
Characters Control (n=50) Treated (n=50) (F- Impact<br />
Base line<br />
(A)<br />
End line<br />
(B)<br />
(C=B-<br />
A)<br />
Base line<br />
(D)<br />
End line<br />
(E)<br />
(F=<br />
E-D)<br />
C) (%)<br />
Total poultry (no.) 562 583 21 569 823 254 233 40.95<br />
Mean flock size/ HH<br />
(no.)<br />
No. <strong>of</strong> eggs in 52<br />
weeks<br />
Egg weight at 52 nd<br />
week<br />
Body Weight (g) at<br />
52 nd week<br />
Age at first laying<br />
(days)<br />
11.24±1.41 11.66±1.0 0.42 11.38±1.2 16.46±1.4 4.8 ** 4.38 38.49<br />
34.5±2.14 37.6±2.35 3.1 * 35.6±2.23 41.2±2.26 5.6 ** 2.5 7.02<br />
37.6±2.11 40.1±3.14 2.5 38.1±3.17 46.2±3.19 8.1 ** 5.6 14.70<br />
1456±52 1974±61 518 * 1512±51 2324±63 812 ** 294 19.44<br />
215.2±3.2 213.2±2.6 -2.0 218.6±4.1 195.6±2.1 -23 ** -21 9.61<br />
Mortality at 0-5 week 20.3 19.6 -0.7 19.5 12.6 -6.9 -6.2 6.20<br />
*<br />
Significant (p
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
In the present study, net income per household was increased by 52.94%, whereas per bird<br />
income was increased by about 22.35% (Table 2) mainly because <strong>of</strong> increase in body weight<br />
(19.44%) and improved egg production (7.02%). Poultry farmers in the treatment group<br />
increased their expenditure by 111.11% mainly on concentrate feeding and healthcare that led<br />
to higher weight gain ultimately resulting in increased returns.<br />
Conclusion<br />
The study showed that poultry production and income <strong>of</strong> poultry farmers could be increased<br />
by incorporation <strong>of</strong> superior varieties, technologies and input supports pertaining to healthcare<br />
and nutrition along with advisory and education.<br />
References<br />
Pankaj, P.K., Nirmala, G., Shankar, K.R., Reddy, B.S. and Chary, G.R. 2019. Improved poultry<br />
variety for income and nutritional security in semi-arid areas <strong>of</strong> Telangana. Ind.<br />
Farming, 69(6): 18-21.<br />
Rajkumar, U., Rama Rao, S.V. andRaju, M.V.L.N. 2021. Backyard poultry farming for<br />
sustained production and enhanced nutritional and livelihood security with special<br />
reference to India: a review. Trop. Anim. Health. Prod., 53: 176.<br />
T6-13P-1025<br />
Strengthening Small holder Agriculture in Rainfed Areas: Livelihood<br />
Analysis <strong>of</strong> Pigeonpea Growing Farmers <strong>of</strong> Telangana state<br />
G. Nirmala*, A. Amarender Reddy, P. K. Pankaj, K. Ravi Shankar and V. K. Singh<br />
ICAR-Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, Hyderabad-500059, Telangana, India<br />
*g.nirmala@icar.gov.in<br />
With over 1.5 billion people worldwide living in small producer households, the development<br />
<strong>of</strong> these households is critical for income growth, poverty reduction, food security, gender<br />
empowerment, and environmental sustainability (Pingali, 2012). Smallholder agriculture is an<br />
integral part <strong>of</strong> rural livelihoods. As a result, increasing their viability could help to reduce rural<br />
poverty, improve food security and nutrition on multiple levels, and contribute to the<br />
achievement <strong>of</strong> several Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). According to FAO, WFP, and<br />
IFAD (2012), smallholder agriculture development may have a significant impact on the poor's<br />
quality <strong>of</strong> life by increasing income and food availability. Fan and Rue 2020, discussed that<br />
small farmers can succeed by either adopting a ‘move up’ or ‘move out’ strategy. While, some<br />
small farmers may be able to develop their farm operations and engage in pr<strong>of</strong>itable<br />
commercial agriculture activities, others should be assisted in existing agriculture and also<br />
support seeking non-farm employment opportunities. The study was undertaken with the<br />
827 | Page Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
objectives <strong>of</strong> identifying various options for household diversification available with rainfed<br />
farmers with an estimation <strong>of</strong> the diversification index and determining factors that influence<br />
livelihood diversification strategies.<br />
Methodology<br />
The pigeonpea growing farmers from the high pigeonpea cultivating area <strong>of</strong> Telangana State were<br />
selected for the study. The area under pigeonpea was reported to be relatively more in three mandals<br />
namely Tandur, Peddamul and Dharur in 2021. Two villages each from the three mandals selected.<br />
Data were collected from 75 farmers constituting a sample <strong>of</strong> study comprising small, medium and<br />
large farmers largely cultivating pigeonpea and other crops on aspects <strong>of</strong> sources <strong>of</strong> family income<br />
received from crops, livestock, horticulture, remittances received from government schemes and<br />
other household activities. Various farm and non-farm sources <strong>of</strong> income were identified and<br />
significant factors that determine the impact <strong>of</strong> rural livelihood <strong>of</strong> rainfed farmers in predominant<br />
pigeon pea growing areas.<br />
Results<br />
The majority <strong>of</strong> farmers were small and marginal (70%), medium (25%) and large (5%) who are<br />
cultivating short-duration pigeonpea crop varieties <strong>of</strong> 150 -180 days duration. pigeonpeais<br />
cultivated both in kharif and rabi seasons. In rabi season, pigeonpea crop usually is transplanted<br />
and irrigated. A majority <strong>of</strong> small and marginal farmers were found to have high diversity index<br />
ranging between 0.7040-0.7346 and medium (24.66 %) and large farmers (5.48 %) have a diversity<br />
index <strong>of</strong> less than 0.6560 which indicated that small farmers are more diversified compared to large<br />
farmers (Table1). Small farmer households depend upon other non-farm activities and government<br />
schemes for their livelihood other than farming in contrast to medium farmers and large farmers<br />
livelihood patterns.<br />
Diversity index for different landholders concerning household income in pigeon pea growing areas<br />
Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts<br />
828 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Conclusion<br />
The majority <strong>of</strong> farmers <strong>of</strong> predominant rainfed pigeonpea cultivation areas are small and<br />
marginal farmers followed by medium and large farmer categories. The large farmers mostly<br />
adopt intensified farming bringing more area into the cultivation <strong>of</strong> pigeonpea and less engaged<br />
in other non-farm activities, which is in contrast to small and marginal farmers' livelihood<br />
patterns, relatively are more diversified in terms <strong>of</strong> sources <strong>of</strong> income and cropping patterns.<br />
Small farmers seem to be more risk-prone and depend upon non-farm sources <strong>of</strong> income for<br />
livelihood. Here the socio-economic conditions <strong>of</strong> farmers forma decisive factor in the extent<br />
<strong>of</strong> diversification and small, marginal farmers engage in various farm as well as non-farm<br />
activities for livelihood improvement.<br />
Extension initiatives must incorporate agricultural programmes for the improvement <strong>of</strong><br />
farming systems, value chain aspects, and development <strong>of</strong> marketing infrastructure. To increase<br />
the productivity <strong>of</strong> smallholder agriculture, new innovative channels are also needed for<br />
knowledge sharing and to complement efforts in terms <strong>of</strong> organizing field days and on-farm<br />
demonstrations through intense use <strong>of</strong> print and audio media.<br />
References<br />
FAO, WFP and IFAD. 2012. The State <strong>of</strong> food insecurity in the world. Economic growth is<br />
necessary but not sufficient to accelerate the reduction <strong>of</strong> hunger and malnutrition.<br />
Rome: FAO. http://www.fao.org/3/a-i3027e.pdf.<br />
Fan, S. and Christopher, Rue. 2020. The role <strong>of</strong> smallholder farms in a Changing World. (In)<br />
Gomezy Paloma, Lauria Riosgo, Kamel and Louhichi (Eds). The role <strong>of</strong> Small farms<br />
in food and Nutrition security. ISBN 978-3030-42147-2. https://doi-org/10.1007-3-<br />
030-42148-9. 13-28.<br />
Pingali, P. L. 2012. Green Revolution: Impacts, limits, and the path ahead. Proceedings <strong>of</strong><br />
National Academy <strong>of</strong> Sciences, 109(31), 12302–12308.<br />
T6-14P-1026<br />
Institutional Innovations for Accelerating Technology Transfer: CRIDA’s<br />
Experiences<br />
C A Rama Rao * , B.M.K Raju, K. Nagasree, Josily Samuel, R.N. Kumar and V.K. Singh<br />
ICAR-Central research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, Hyderabad 500059<br />
*car.rao@icar.gov.in<br />
Sustainable agricultural development warrants a coordinated effort among multiple<br />
institutions. In fact, the remarkable achievements in Indian agriculture are a result <strong>of</strong> a<br />
coordinated effort between the research, extension, policy and other supporting organizations<br />
829 | Page Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
obviously with the ingenuity and perseverance <strong>of</strong> farmers at the core. Notwithstanding the<br />
progress <strong>of</strong> agriculture in terms <strong>of</strong> country’s journey towards self-sufficiency and export<br />
orientation, contributions to raising incomes, industrial growth etc., Indian agriculture,<br />
especially the predominant rainfed agriculture, is confronting challenges such as land<br />
degradation, climate change, rising input prices, market imperfections, international<br />
competition, labour market changes, vulnerable livelihoods, etc. Such challenges require that<br />
the research and adoption lags be shortened so that the impacts are realized quicker and the<br />
returns to investments enhanced. This calls for a much more coordinated and coherent<br />
functioning <strong>of</strong> different institutions involved in agricultural technology development and<br />
transfer.<br />
This paper reviews the experiences <strong>of</strong> ICAR-Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture<br />
(ICAR-CRIDA), with the mandate <strong>of</strong> contributing to more sustainable rainfed agriculture, in<br />
adapting her approach to research and technology transfer over time in terms <strong>of</strong> institutional<br />
innovations.<br />
Methodology<br />
The methodology involved tracing <strong>of</strong> major projects <strong>of</strong> ICAR-CRIDA in terms <strong>of</strong> their<br />
emphasis on approach to technology development and transfer and participation <strong>of</strong> various<br />
institutions over the last about thirty years.<br />
Results<br />
The word ‘institutions’ mean, in addition to the formal ‘organizations’, formal ad informal<br />
norms <strong>of</strong> how different organizations function within them and with other organizations in<br />
pursuit <strong>of</strong> (shared) mandate and goals. ICAR-CRIDA, when came into being, inherited the<br />
concept <strong>of</strong> Operational Research Project <strong>of</strong> the All India Coordinated research Project on<br />
Dryland Agriculture that had the responsibility <strong>of</strong> demonstrating and refining technologies in<br />
real farm situations. The institute was one <strong>of</strong> the first when the ICAR started to emphasize on<br />
participatory technology development in the form <strong>of</strong> the ‘Institute Village Linkage Programme’<br />
(IVLP) where in technology development is more need based and demand driven with<br />
emphasis on participation <strong>of</strong> farmers in problem identification as well as in evolving solutions.<br />
Deployment <strong>of</strong> various participatory tools, which were till then rarely used, helped scientists<br />
better appreciate the farmers’ situation and thus enabled sharpening research focus. This<br />
emphasis on farmers’ participation took a concrete shape in one <strong>of</strong> the projects funded by the<br />
Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research wherein a number <strong>of</strong> innovative tools<br />
were used to build awareness among farmers about the need for adoption <strong>of</strong> sustainable soil<br />
management practices. A more visible adaptation in approach happened when the institute<br />
started to view agricultural research in the broader context <strong>of</strong> livelihoods through a multiinstitutional<br />
effort. This effort, in the form <strong>of</strong> a research project supported by the Department<br />
Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts<br />
830 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
for International Development, United Kingdom, broadened the perspective towards livelihood<br />
betterment and partnerships to include the non-governmental organizations in a project mode.<br />
Such a partnership was also instrumental in creating an innovative community-based institution<br />
viz., salah samithi, that helped better acceptance <strong>of</strong> technologies, facilitation <strong>of</strong> smoother<br />
project delivery and implementation and save time <strong>of</strong> scientists (Rama Rao et al., 2007). The<br />
multi-institutional collaboration broadened further in the ICAR’s National Agricultural<br />
Innovation Project that included the private sector players. Thus, a well-planned multiinstitutional<br />
project enabled implementation <strong>of</strong> interventions in the areas <strong>of</strong> productivity<br />
enhancement largely supported by research organizations, better natural resource management<br />
through building community-based organizations facilitated by NGOs and strengthening<br />
market linkages and information dissemination by the private sector players. The results were<br />
visible in the form <strong>of</strong> higher productivity and incomes and better and more equitable use <strong>of</strong><br />
natural resources. One <strong>of</strong> the key interventions <strong>of</strong> such an effort was creation <strong>of</strong> local water<br />
users’ association that led to more efficient and equitable groundwater utilisation (Rama Rao<br />
et al., 2017). These experiences with institutional innovations were taken forwarded in the<br />
technology demonstration component <strong>of</strong> the ‘National Innovations in Climate Resilient<br />
Agriculture’ where in multiple village-based institutions were created to enable making and<br />
implement decisions on technology adoption (Srinivasa Rao et al., 2016). Such institutions<br />
include village climate risk management committee, custom hiring centre, seed bank, fodder<br />
bank that help deal with multiple dimensions <strong>of</strong> impacts <strong>of</strong> climate change and variability.<br />
However, not all such institutional interventions are equally effective in all locations and a<br />
comprehensive explanation to such variable performance is a question to be addressed invoking<br />
tools <strong>of</strong> social and economics science tools.<br />
Conclusion<br />
Sustainable agricultural development is increasingly complex and challenging. Efforts towards<br />
more sustainable agriculture warrants institutional interventions in terms <strong>of</strong> how different<br />
institutions work together in a complementary manner and creation <strong>of</strong> community-based<br />
organizations that help shorten research and adoption lags. However, it is important to<br />
understand the factors that facilitate or constrain effectiveness <strong>of</strong> such institutional<br />
interventions.<br />
Average time spent by scientists in dealing with community with and without ‘salah<br />
samithi’<br />
Phase <strong>of</strong> the<br />
project<br />
Without Salah<br />
Samithi<br />
With Salah samithi t value p value<br />
Early 5.97 (0.81) 5.83 (0.96) 0.41 0.68<br />
Mid 4.1 (0.51) 2.30 (0.56) 9.22
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Net returns from crop production obtained by bore well owners and water receivers<br />
before and after networking (Rs/household)<br />
Before<br />
(2008-09)<br />
After<br />
(2010-11)<br />
Difference *<br />
All farmers 7973 22011 14038 (176%)<br />
Bore well owners 18267 34601 16334 (89%)<br />
Water receivers 1438 14000 12562 (873%)<br />
Ratio <strong>of</strong> net returns <strong>of</strong> bore well owners to<br />
the water receivers<br />
12.7 2.5<br />
Gini coefficient 0.58 0.24<br />
Coefficient <strong>of</strong> variation in income (%) 128 67<br />
*<br />
All differences are significant at 1 per cent; Source: Rama Rao et al…<br />
References<br />
Rama Rao, C.A., Sreenath Dixit, G. Surendranath, K.V. Rao, B. Sanjeeva Reddy, Josily<br />
Samuel, B.M.K. Raju and B. Venkateswarlu 2017. Enabling a more equitable and<br />
efficient groundwater irrigation in rainfed regions <strong>of</strong> South India. Indian j. dryland<br />
agric. res. dev.32(1):15-20<br />
Rama Rao, C.A., Sreenath Dixit, K. Nagasree and K.V. Subrahmanyam. 2007. Institutional<br />
innovation and project delivery: A case study <strong>of</strong> Salaha Samithis. Indian j. ext. educ.<br />
43 ( 3&4), 32-36<br />
Srinivasa Rao, Ch., J.V.N.S. Prasad, M. Osman, Y.G. Prasad, D.B.V. Ramana, I. Srinivas, K.<br />
Nagasree, C.A. Rama Rao, et al., (2016). Technology Demonstrations – Enhancing<br />
resilience and adaptive capacity <strong>of</strong> farmers to climate variability. Highlights 2015-16.<br />
CRIDA, Hyderabad & NRM & AE Division, ICAR, New Delhi<br />
Need for more Flexibility in Crop Insurance Scheme (PMFBY)<br />
T6-15P-1673<br />
A. Amarender Reddy, Y. L. Meghana, Cheruku Sai Priya and Ch. Bala Swamy<br />
ICAR-CRIDA<br />
One bad crop season leads to a situation <strong>of</strong> destruction <strong>of</strong> crops, farm assets, crop losses. Crop<br />
losses force farmers to take debt from money lenders at exorbitant interest rates, leading to<br />
farm distress and ultimately farmers suicides. Farmers face different types <strong>of</strong> losses at different<br />
stages <strong>of</strong> crop growth. Crop insurance against these losses are necessary not only to cope with<br />
sudden shocks/unexpected losses to their incomes and for adoption <strong>of</strong> yield increasing<br />
technologies.<br />
Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts<br />
832 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
To insure against crop losses, government <strong>of</strong> India is implementing Prime Minister Fasal<br />
Bhima Yojana (PMFBY) scheme with a huge premium subsidy since 2016. However, after<br />
initial good response, some states are withdrawn from the scheme and started their own crop<br />
insurance scheme. Now only 21 <strong>of</strong> the 34 states are implementing this scheme while others are<br />
doing it on their end or some states don’t have any crop insurance scheme. The states like<br />
Telangana, Andhra Pradesh, Bihar, Gujarat, Jharkhand and West Bengal are withdrawn from<br />
the scheme in past few years. Since beginning <strong>of</strong> the scheme, Punjab is not participated. Under<br />
the scheme, area insured decreased from 55.0 million hectares in 2018 to 45.2 million hectares<br />
in 2021. Number <strong>of</strong> farmers are similarly decreased and now only about 3 crore farmers are<br />
participating in crop insurance out <strong>of</strong> 12 crore farmers in India. It shows there is some problems<br />
in implementation <strong>of</strong> the scheme in some states. However, some positive aspect is, recently<br />
after 4-5 years <strong>of</strong> withdrawal, both Telangana and Andhra Pradesh states are re-enrolling in to<br />
the scheme after getting assurance <strong>of</strong> universal coverage. Past experience shows that, the main<br />
reasons for withdrawal are (i) more out go as premium subsidy compared to claims received<br />
by the farmers in some states, (ii) delay in claim payments, (iii) specific needs <strong>of</strong> the states for<br />
example, in states like Punjab low risk states and crop loss is very rare due to floods or droughts,<br />
but they face hailstorms, against which they may need insurance at least cost, (iv) general lack<br />
<strong>of</strong> awareness about crop insurance among farmers and (iv) laborious and complex process <strong>of</strong><br />
determining premium levels, estimating crop loss and ultimately paying claims to farmers.<br />
The riskiness <strong>of</strong> crop production and risk bearing ability <strong>of</strong> the farmers vary significantly with<br />
the type <strong>of</strong> crops grown, irrigated and non-irrigated areas, level <strong>of</strong> commercialization, small vs<br />
big farmers and stage <strong>of</strong> development etc. Any crop insurance scheme not considering these<br />
variations in designing the schemes may suffer from low enrolments.<br />
In crop insurance, threshold yield is the basis for payment <strong>of</strong> claims. The threshold yield <strong>of</strong> a<br />
crop is equal to the average yield multiplied by the Indemnity level. Farmers get claims, only<br />
if the actual yield is below the threshold yield. Under PMFBY three levels <strong>of</strong> indemnity are<br />
applicable at90, 80 and 70 per cent. It means, claims will be given to farmers, only if the loss<br />
is more than 10, 20 and 30 per cent respectively. But, in states like Punjab, yield loss above<br />
10% rare, hence, appropriate indemnity level should be 95%, so that even if losses are 5%,<br />
farmers get claims. Punjab is not generally hit by droughts or floods but occasionally suffer<br />
due to hailstorms, to cover this farmer wants to take single peril insurance with a premium <strong>of</strong><br />
not beyond 1%, unlike uniform1.5% to 5% under PMFBY. Similarly assured irrigated areas <strong>of</strong><br />
paddy and wheat in other states are also very low risk areas, who don’t want to pay higher<br />
premium. But in contrast, in drought districts like Rayalaseema region <strong>of</strong> Andhra Pradesh or<br />
Vidarbha region <strong>of</strong> Maharashtra, or in Thar desert <strong>of</strong> Rajasthan or in cultivation <strong>of</strong> fruits and<br />
vegetable is riskier, yield loss <strong>of</strong>30% is common, hence these farmers are willing to pay higher<br />
premium for indemnity level <strong>of</strong> 30% to cover frequent losses. These types <strong>of</strong> geographical<br />
variations need to be accommodated in the PMFBY.<br />
833 | Page Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Another major problem with PMFBY is non-participation <strong>of</strong> tenant farmers. Now about 20-25<br />
per cent <strong>of</strong> operational area is cultivated by share-croppers/tenant farmers, but until now there<br />
is no pool pro<strong>of</strong> mechanism to include them as beneficiaries. Although, some states issued<br />
tenancy certificates like Loan Eligibility Cards (LEC) <strong>of</strong> Andhra Pradesh, popularity <strong>of</strong> these<br />
certificates is dismal. As a result, most <strong>of</strong> the tenant farmers are out <strong>of</strong> the PMFBY net.<br />
Similarly, in PMFBY there is a need to cover additional costs incurred by farmers in unforeseen<br />
situations. For example, in case <strong>of</strong> pest outbreak, farmers spend huge amount on purchase <strong>of</strong><br />
pesticides to save crop especially in cotton, chillies and vegetables although sometimes these<br />
operations will not result in saving the crops but adds to the cost. There is no provision to cover<br />
for these additional costs, as the sum insured is limited by scale <strong>of</strong> finance. So, situations vary<br />
significantly across geographies and crops, which force states to withdraw from the PMFBY<br />
and start their own crop insurance scheme according to local needs.<br />
These withdrawn states started their own tailor-made crop insurance schemes to suit their local<br />
conditions over the past few years. Of the schemes, Mukhyamantri Sahay Yojana <strong>of</strong> Gujarat,<br />
Bihar Rajya Fasal Sahayata Yojana (BRFSY) <strong>of</strong> Bihar, Bangla Shashya Bima (BSB) <strong>of</strong> West<br />
Bengal, YSR free crop insurance scheme and Jharkhand Fasal Rahat Yojana are at different<br />
stages <strong>of</strong> implementation and learning curve.<br />
Mukhyamantri Sahay Yojana <strong>of</strong> Gujarat, Bihar Rajya Fasal Sahayata Yojana (BRFSY) <strong>of</strong><br />
Bihar and YSR free crop insurance <strong>of</strong> Andhra Pradesh cover all the farmers with zero premium.<br />
In Gujarat, blocks are classified as two categories (i) more than 60% loss with claim <strong>of</strong><br />
Rs.25.000/ha, (ii) 33% to 60% loss with claim <strong>of</strong> Rs.20,000/ha. It seems Gujarat government<br />
scheme is simple to understand and implement. Under the scheme, big losses above 30% are<br />
only covered.<br />
Similarly, Bihar state guaranteed payment <strong>of</strong> Rs 10,000/ha if the loss was more than 20% <strong>of</strong><br />
the threshold yield. If the damage is less than 20% <strong>of</strong> the threshold limit, farmers can get Rs<br />
7,500 per hectare. However, the indemnity level was kept at 70%. It means farmers in Bihar<br />
also get claims only if yields loss is more than 30%.<br />
Bangla Shashya Bima (BSB) <strong>of</strong> West Bengal running since 2019 with Agricultural Insurance<br />
Corporation (AIC) as nodal agency. It also covers tenant farmers and share croppers. Farmers<br />
did not have to pay premium for food and oilseed crops. For potato and sugarcane, the farmers<br />
have to pay 4.85% <strong>of</strong> the sum insured as premium. Under the scheme, if claims are less than<br />
80% <strong>of</strong> the premium, AIC will refund to the state government the difference between the claims<br />
paid and 80% <strong>of</strong> the premium received. Claims depends on yield loss indirectly measured by<br />
crop health factor based on satellite and weather data collected from automatic weather stations<br />
maintained by department <strong>of</strong> agriculture. Major indicators for calculating crop health factor are<br />
crop greenness (normalized difference vegetation index), crop wetness (land surface water<br />
Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts<br />
834 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
index), crop structure (backscatter ratio) and plant canopy/ biomass (fraction <strong>of</strong> absorbed<br />
photosynthetically active radiation). Crop health data will be corroborated with yield data to<br />
check robustness.<br />
Overall, PMFBY needs to be more flexible to accommodate the wider diversity <strong>of</strong> the states.<br />
Since last few years, PMFBY improved in many respects depending on the experience and also<br />
requests from the states like online updation and direct payments, integration <strong>of</strong> data with the<br />
state portals, use <strong>of</strong> technology in loss estimation, tenant farmers coverage, timely settlement<br />
<strong>of</strong> grievances, penal interest payments to farmers for delay in claims payment and universal<br />
coverage etc. However, still a long way to go to accommodate all the states in the PMFBY.<br />
T6-16P-1053<br />
Performance and Economic Evaluation <strong>of</strong> Agri-Horti System under<br />
Rainfed Condition <strong>of</strong> Marathwada Region<br />
A.S. Gunjkar*, W.N. Narkhede, P.H. Gourkhede and M.S. Pendke<br />
All India Coordinated Research Project on Dryland Agriculture<br />
Vasantrao Naik Marathwada Agricultural University, Parbhani<br />
*amrapaliomshinde@gmail.com<br />
Drumstick is one <strong>of</strong> the important perennial vegetable (horticulture) crop grown in the region.<br />
It’s origin is the sub-Himalayan tracts <strong>of</strong> north-western India, Pakistan, drumstick can further<br />
be increased as it grow well in all types <strong>of</strong> soil, from acid to alkaline (Duke 1983) and can<br />
tolerate up to 6 months <strong>of</strong> dry season. It grows well at altitudes from 0 to 1800 msl and rainfall<br />
between 500 and 1500 mm per year. It is therefore useful for semi-arid and arid ecosystem,<br />
which covers 37.0% geographical area and 16.7% arid area (Velayutham 1999) by facilitating<br />
irrigation. In nutritional and medicinal view, almost every part <strong>of</strong> the drumstick plant has value<br />
for food. The pods, seeds, leaves and flowers are consumed by humans as nutritious vegetables<br />
in some countries (Makkar and Becker 1997). Drumstick is mainly grown for edible pods;<br />
however, it has huge commercial value for seed also as it contains 38 to 40% oil (Irvine 1961).<br />
Drumstick seed powder is said to be an effective organic clarifier <strong>of</strong> even very turbid water by<br />
removing up to 99% <strong>of</strong> bacteria in the process (Folkland and Sutherland 1996). Looking to the<br />
importance <strong>of</strong> drumstick plants, the experiment was planned in combination with crops and<br />
cropping system under agri-horti system for sustainability under rainfed ecosystem.<br />
Methodology<br />
An experiment was conducted at AICRP on Dryland Agriculture, Vasantrao Naik Marathwada<br />
Krishi Vidyapeeth, Parbhani during the year 2012-2017. The studies consisted <strong>of</strong> sole crop <strong>of</strong><br />
drumstick <strong>of</strong> distance 3x3 m. and drumstick four intercrops 1:6 ratio and their correlation with<br />
yield. The experiment was laid out in Four replication in Randomized block design.<br />
835 | Page Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Effect <strong>of</strong> Alternate land use systems on crop yield and economics<br />
Treatment Yield Cost <strong>of</strong><br />
C 1- Drumstick Sole<br />
(3x3m)<br />
C 2- Drumstick +<br />
GreeenGram (1:6)<br />
C 3- Drumstick +<br />
Soybean (1:6)<br />
C 4- Drumstick +<br />
Kharif Sorghum (1:6)<br />
C 5- Drumstick +<br />
Green mannuring<br />
(1:6)<br />
Results<br />
Drumstick<br />
Equivalent<br />
Yield (kg/ha)<br />
System<br />
Yield<br />
(q/ha)<br />
cultivation<br />
( Rs/ha)<br />
Net<br />
return<br />
( Rs/ha)<br />
B:C<br />
ratio<br />
RWUE<br />
(kg/ha-mm)<br />
107.25 107.25 25334 81916 4.23 16.86<br />
44.82 143.98 37304 106676 3.85 22.63<br />
56.27 140.52 51685 88835 2.71 22.09<br />
41.77 123.67 42670 81000 2.85 19.44<br />
149.20 149.20 29834 119367 5.01 23.45<br />
The pooled data on yield parameters and economics is presented in Table 1. Data indicated that<br />
Drumstick + Green manuring recorded the higher drumstick equivalent yield <strong>of</strong> 149.20 q/ha it<br />
was followed by Drumstick + Black gram (1:6) (140.52 q/ha) whereas in case <strong>of</strong> intercrops<br />
higher yield was recorded by soybean followed by blackgram.<br />
Weight and number <strong>of</strong> drumstick pod/plant (Pooled 2012-17)<br />
Treatment No. <strong>of</strong> sticks /plant Wt. <strong>of</strong> single stick (g)<br />
C 1- Drumstick Sole (3x3m) 169.80 57.20<br />
C 2- Drumstick + Green gram (1:6) 166.40 54.60<br />
C 3- Drumstick + Soybean (1:6) 158.60 49.20<br />
C 4- Drumstick + Kharif Sorghum (1:6) 154.00 47.40<br />
C 5- Drumstick + Green mannuring (1:6) 218.80 62.20<br />
The data depicted in Table 2 conclude that number <strong>of</strong> sticks per plant recorded significantly<br />
higher 218.80 in treatment C5- Drumstick + Green mannuring (1:6) compared to other<br />
treatments. Whereas minimum 154.00 number <strong>of</strong> sticks per plant recorded in treatment C 4-<br />
Drumstick + Kharif Sorghum (1:6).<br />
The weight <strong>of</strong> single stick found to be significantly highest 62.20g in treatment C 5- Drumstick<br />
+ Green mannuring (1:6) followed by treatment C 1- Drumstick Sole (3x3m) 57.20g. Whereas<br />
lowest weight <strong>of</strong> single stick is found in treatment C4- Drumstick + Kharif Sorghum (1:6).<br />
Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts<br />
836 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Yield <strong>of</strong> drumstick (Pooled data 2012-17)<br />
Treatment Drumstick yield (q/ha) Inter crop yield (kg/ha)<br />
C 1- Drumstick Sole (3x3m) 107.25 -<br />
C 2- Drumstick + Green gram (1:6) 99.16 804<br />
C 3- Drumstick + Soybean (1:6) 84.25 1845<br />
C 4- Drumstick + Kharif Sorghum (1:6) 81.90 2017<br />
C 5- Drumstick + Green manuring (1:6) 149.20 3745<br />
SE 3.12 --<br />
CD at 5% 9.37 --<br />
The pooled data <strong>of</strong> mean yield represented that the maximum 149.20 q/ha yield in the treatment<br />
C5- Drumstick + Green manuring (1:6) and lowest 81.90 q/ha yield in treatment C4- Drumstick<br />
+ Kharif Sorghum (1:6).<br />
Soil nutrient status under drumstick-based cropping system (Pooled data 2012-17)<br />
Treatments pH EC<br />
(ds m -1 )<br />
Org. C<br />
%<br />
Available nutrients<br />
N P K<br />
C 1- Drumstick Sole (3x3m) 8.01 0.40 0.42 193.26 10.32 567.21<br />
C 2- Drumstick + Green gram (1:6) 7.86 0.28 0.57 235.23 17.42 592.19<br />
C 3- Drumstick + Soybean (1:6) 7.97 0.40 0.48 203.83 12.24 581.46<br />
C 4- Drumstick + Kharif Sorghum (1:6) 7.97 0.38 0.51 218.80 13.68 577.56<br />
C 5- Drumstick + Green mannuring (1:6) 7.75 0.30 0.66 264.80 19.68 596.47<br />
SE ± 0.01 0.030 0.68 3.41 1.17 3.77<br />
CD at 5% NS NS 0.19 10.43 3.42 11.01<br />
Mean 7.91 0.35 0.52 223.18 14.66 582.97<br />
Data presented in Table 4 revealed that the soil pH and EC were not significantly affected due<br />
to different drumstick based intercropping systems. Whereas, improvement in soil organic<br />
carbon and over all soil major nutrients were improved over treatment C1. Significantly<br />
highest organic carbon was observed due to treatment C5 i.e. green manuring and available<br />
nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium were also higher due to growing green manuring crop with<br />
drumstick crop.<br />
Conclusion<br />
The Agri-horti system comprising Drumstick + Green mannuring (1:6) and Drumstick + Green<br />
gram are found to be superior in yield advantage and economical returns under rainfed<br />
condition <strong>of</strong> Marathwada region.<br />
837 | Page Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
References<br />
Duck, J.A. 1983. Handbook <strong>of</strong> energy crops (Moringa oleifera). Center for new crops and plant<br />
products. Purdue University, India, US.<br />
http://www.hort.purdue.edu/newcrop/duke_energy/Moringa_oleifera.html.<br />
Folkland, G.K. and Sutherland, J.P. 1996. Moringa oliefera- a multipurpose tree. Food chain,<br />
Intermediate Technology myson House, Railway terrace, Rugby, CV213HT, UK.<br />
P.18.<br />
Irvine, F.R. 1961. Woody plants <strong>of</strong> Ghana with special reference to their uses. Oxford<br />
University press, London.<br />
Makkar, H.P.S. and Becker, K. 1997. Nutrients and antiquality factors in different<br />
morphological parts <strong>of</strong> the Moringa oleifera tree. J. Agric. Sci., Cambridge 128:<br />
311–332.<br />
Velayutham, R.V. 1999. Agro-Ecological Sub-regions <strong>of</strong> India for Planning and Development.<br />
National Bureau <strong>of</strong> Soil Science and Land Use Planning (NBSSLUP), pp. 1-279.<br />
T6-17P-1074<br />
Impact <strong>of</strong> Agricultural Extension in Managing Biotic and Abiotic Stress in<br />
Rainfed Areas<br />
V. P. Suryavanshi<br />
Regional Agricultural Extension Education Centre, Ambejogai, Beed 431517, VNMAU, Maharashtra,<br />
India<br />
Various technologies are developed and recommended for management <strong>of</strong> biotic and abiotic<br />
stress in rainfed areas. Proper and timely adoption <strong>of</strong> these technologies needs to be accelerated<br />
for harvesting positive economic impacts on farmers’ fields. Among various crop production<br />
factors, management <strong>of</strong> insect pests and plant diseases are the crucial factors determining the<br />
crop yields. The climate change and weather variabilities created enormous difficulties at<br />
farmers’ level to harvest potential crop yields, mainly in soybean, redgram, gram while to some<br />
extend horticultural crops like papaya, banana and chilli grown in the region. Dryspell <strong>of</strong> more<br />
than 15 days and heavy rainfall coupled with high humidity and low solar radiation increased<br />
the infestation <strong>of</strong> stem borer in soybean, fusarium and phytophthora wilt in redgram. Wilting<br />
<strong>of</strong> gram is a major problem in the predominant soybean-gram cropping system <strong>of</strong> the region.<br />
Suboptimal micronutrients and low organic carbon content <strong>of</strong> the soil created unhealthy and<br />
virus infected growth <strong>of</strong> papaya, banana, and chilli. Extension functionaries need to work<br />
efficiently to disseminate recommended technologies effectively. Hence, it necessitates to<br />
assess the role <strong>of</strong> an extension agronomist <strong>of</strong> the Regional Agricultural Extension Education<br />
Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts<br />
838 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Centre (RAEEC) and subject matter specialist for strengthening the agricultural extension work<br />
in rainfed areas.<br />
Methodology<br />
The major crops <strong>of</strong> the Marathwada region <strong>of</strong> Maharashtra are soybean, redgram, cotton, gram.<br />
The horticultural crops like papaya, banana, tomato and chilli are also grown on limited scale.<br />
For harvesting good yield with low cost <strong>of</strong> production, various technologies viz., nutrient<br />
management, weed management, pest management water management, mechanization have<br />
been recommended by the Vasantrao Naik Marathwada Agricultural University (VNMAU),<br />
Parbhani, other SAUs and ICAR centres at regional and national level. In this regard,<br />
agricultural extension services are run by the VNMAU, Parbhani, other SAUs with the RAEEC<br />
and KVKs to transfer such technologies for adoption by farmers. The RAEEC under<br />
Directorate <strong>of</strong> Extension Education, VNMAU, Parbhani are established at Ambajogai, Latur,<br />
Aurangabad and Parbhani to disseminate the agricultural technologies among the farmers <strong>of</strong><br />
Marathwada region comprising eight districts. RAEEC developed a system to approach 60000<br />
farmers <strong>of</strong> each district in collaboration with State Agriculture Department. The need-based<br />
advisories are reaching the farmers through the system channel i.e., from scientists – SMS<br />
/extension agronomist – DSAO – Taluka Agriculture Officer –Mandal Agriculture Officer –<br />
Agriculture Supervisor – Agriculture Assistant – Farmer through conducting monthly district<br />
field visits, workshop, trainings and WhatsApp. This article considered integrated management<br />
strategies to manage biotic and abiotic stress on farmers’ fields, concluding with a brief outline<br />
<strong>of</strong> future directions which might lead to the integration <strong>of</strong> described methods in a system-based<br />
approach for more effective management <strong>of</strong> biotic and abiotic stress.<br />
Results<br />
State Agriculture Universities and ICAR research institutes have released various technologies<br />
for increasing production and productivity <strong>of</strong> rainfed areas. Technological intervention through<br />
extension activities is important for widescale adoption <strong>of</strong> these recommendations.<br />
Cropping system: Mixed cropping, intercropping and crop rotation are important practices that<br />
are widely emphasized to break the life cycle <strong>of</strong> insect pests and to avoid the inoculums buildup<br />
<strong>of</strong> soil-borne pathogens and these practices are proved to be most effective tool in real farm<br />
situations to manage biotic and abiotic stresses. Crop rotation is also associated with enhanced<br />
soil fertility, improvement in soil chemical and physical properties, good soil water<br />
management and soil erosion control.<br />
Sowing method: In soybean, use <strong>of</strong> Broad Bed and Furrow (BBF) technology for sowing is<br />
proved to be climate resilient, cost effective by reducing seed rate and insect pest population.<br />
839 | Page Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Soil amendments: Organic amendments to the soil are traditionally used for improving soil<br />
conditions and crop productivity, but they can also aid in suppressing soilborne pathogens. On<br />
farmers field, its evident that crops sown on soil with good organic amendments did not show<br />
viral expressions even though plant is infected.<br />
Soil fertility and plant nutrients: Soil fertility and chemistry including soil pH, organic matter<br />
and available nutrient statuscan play a major role for healthy growth <strong>of</strong> plant. Soil nutrition,<br />
along with the use <strong>of</strong> fertilizers and amendments, have shown direct impact for developing<br />
tolerance against various biotic and abiotic stress.<br />
Conclusion<br />
Among various crop production constraints, management <strong>of</strong> biotic and abiotic stressis the key<br />
to realizing potential crop yields in rainfed areas. The phase-out <strong>of</strong> many chemicals and rising<br />
awareness towards resistance development, environmental health, and climate change<br />
necessitates the quest for suitable integrated management options. Many non-chemical options<br />
such as resistant cultivars/varieties, cropping system, sowing methods, soil amendments, soil<br />
fertility management and plant nutrients application methods proved more effective in<br />
management <strong>of</strong> insect pests and diseases if integrated with chemical methods. Therefore,<br />
published research must be taken to farmers through such agencies as RAEEC and KVKs.<br />
T6-18P-1079<br />
Assessment <strong>of</strong> Cluster Front Line Demonstration (CFLD) on Green gram<br />
(Vigna radiata L. Wildzek) as a Climate Resilient Intervention in Rainfed<br />
Uplands <strong>of</strong> Red & Lateritic tracts <strong>of</strong> Purulia, West Bengal, India during<br />
kharif Season<br />
A. Chakraborty, S.K. Bhattacharya, B. Maity, B. Mahato, C. Ghosh, L. Maity,<br />
D.C. Mahato and B. Maiti<br />
KrishiVigyan Kendra Kalyan, Purulia, 723 147, West Bengal, India<br />
kvkkalyanpurulia@gmail.com<br />
Green gram (Vigna radiata L. Wildzek) is an important pulse crop <strong>of</strong> Purulia District <strong>of</strong> West<br />
Bengal after black gram for the unbunded rainfed uplands during Kharif season. Non-adoption<br />
<strong>of</strong> improved technologies is one <strong>of</strong> the major constraints <strong>of</strong> traditional green gram farming with<br />
lower productivity. Cluster Front Line Demonstrations (CFLD) were conducted (65 nos.) in<br />
103 farmers’ fields over an area <strong>of</strong> 22.5 ha in 14 villages, to demonstrate the production<br />
potential and economic benefits <strong>of</strong> improved technology package comprised <strong>of</strong> newly released<br />
location specific suitable varieties viz., IPM-02-14; Seed rate-25kg/ha; Seed Treatment with<br />
Trichodermaviride @50gm/ha &Pseudomonas fluorescens @ 250 gm/ha and Bi<strong>of</strong>ertilizer as<br />
Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts<br />
840 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Rhizobium @2kg/ha& PSB @ 2kg/ha; application <strong>of</strong> Fertilizer @ 20 kg N, 40 kg P 2O 5&20 kg<br />
K2O /ha as basal with Micronutrient- Zn @25kg/ha and Plant Protection measure for<br />
controlling Bihar hairy caterpillar (Spilarctiaobliqua) through spraying Azadirachtin 3 ml/lt,.<br />
The demonstrations were carried out in Purulia district <strong>of</strong> West Bengal under Red & Lateritic<br />
Agro-climatic zone during Kharif season <strong>of</strong> 2019-20 to 2021-22 for three consecutive years.<br />
The improved technologies recorded significantly higher average yield <strong>of</strong> 8.67 q/ha (57.75 %)<br />
than the yield obtained under farmer’s practices (5.50 q/ha). The improved technologies also<br />
resulted higher mean net return <strong>of</strong> Rs.39,613/ha with a cost benefit ratio <strong>of</strong> 2.25 as compared<br />
to local check (Rs.16,465/ ha, & 1.76 respectively).<br />
T6-19P-1092<br />
Computation <strong>of</strong> Extension Effectiveness Index and Effective Extension<br />
Approaches for Adoption <strong>of</strong> Rainfed Technologies by Farmers from State<br />
Dept. <strong>of</strong> Agriculture, NGO and Private Extension Agency in<br />
Anantapuramu District <strong>of</strong> A.P.<br />
K. Ravi Shankar*, G. Nirmala, K. Nagasree, P.K. Pankaj, C. N. Anshida Beevi,<br />
Jagriti Rohit, C. A. Rama Rao, B. M. K. Raju and V. K. Singh<br />
Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture (CRIDA), Hyderabad 500059, Telangana, India<br />
*kr.shankar@icar.gov.in<br />
Agricultural extension is the conscious communication <strong>of</strong> information to help farmers form<br />
sound opinions and make good decisions on farming. There are several methods for agricultural<br />
technology transfer. Some <strong>of</strong> these include the individual/household extension method, group<br />
method, and mass media method. None <strong>of</strong> these methods can be singled out as the best one as<br />
they all have some advantages and disadvantages. According to Anandajayasekeram et al.<br />
(2008), the choice <strong>of</strong> a method depends on various factors such as the tenure system in the area,<br />
community organization, and resource availability. Meetings, field days, and approaches to<br />
schools may also be good options. Despite the importance <strong>of</strong> agricultural extension in<br />
communicating relevant information about improved production techniques to farmers, there<br />
are limited studies, to the best <strong>of</strong> our knowledge, that evaluate the effectiveness <strong>of</strong> the various<br />
agricultural technology transfer methods/approaches in India in general and Andhra Pradesh<br />
(A.P.) state in particular. This paper, therefore, highlights the effectiveness <strong>of</strong> various<br />
agricultural technology transfer (extension approaches) that are being used by the stakeholders<br />
<strong>of</strong> the agricultural extension delivery system in the Anantapuramu district <strong>of</strong> A.P. The specific<br />
objectives <strong>of</strong> the study were to compute the extension effectiveness index from farmers <strong>of</strong> the<br />
study area and to identify the existing extension approaches employed by extension <strong>of</strong>ficers <strong>of</strong><br />
different agencies in the study area.<br />
841 | Page Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Methodology<br />
A sample <strong>of</strong> 40 farmers was randomly selected from the Anantapuramu district <strong>of</strong> A.P. The<br />
average annual rainfall in Anantapuramu is 550 mm. The sample agencies selected for the study<br />
were Watershed Support Services and Activities Network (WASSAN) an NGO, Coromandel<br />
Fertilizers Limited (CFL) a private extension firm, and the State Department <strong>of</strong> Agriculture<br />
(SDA) representing the government extension agency. In Anantapuramu, Nallacheruvu<br />
(WASSAN), Bukkarayasamudram (CFL), and Atmakur (SDA) mandals were selected for the<br />
study. Care was taken in selecting the mandals (along with villages and respondent farmers)<br />
that were mutually exclusive to avoid overlapping <strong>of</strong> data from each agency i.e., Nallacheruvu<br />
was selected to collect data from WASSAN, Bukkarayasamudram for CFL and Atmakur for<br />
data from SDA. The data was collected using a pre-tested interview schedule and focus group<br />
discussion with the farmers belonging to each agency. The extension effectiveness index<br />
comprised six parameters i.e., timeliness <strong>of</strong> information, utility, ease <strong>of</strong> understanding,<br />
satisfaction in farmers, extension activities, and quality <strong>of</strong> extension services. These parameters<br />
were further subdivided into components and individual weights were assigned to each<br />
component. The weights were rounded to the nearest fifth digit. For each parameter, all<br />
components’ weights were totalled 100. Mean weightages for each parameter were worked out<br />
and they were combined to get the index value to 100. Out <strong>of</strong> the six parameters, utility ranked<br />
first with 25 scores, followed by the timeliness <strong>of</strong> information, ease <strong>of</strong> understanding, and<br />
satisfaction in farmers each with 20 scores, then extension activities with 10 and quality <strong>of</strong><br />
extension services with 5 scores respectively.<br />
Results<br />
The main crops in the study villages are ground nut, red gram, paddy, banana, tomato, and<br />
other vegetables. The mean Extension Effectiveness Index (EEI) value <strong>of</strong> 4.1 was the highest<br />
for WASSAN, followed by SDA (3.79) and CFL (3.52) in that order. In terms <strong>of</strong> the measured<br />
6 parameters in the index, it is clear that extension was highly effective in WASSAN, followed<br />
by SDA and CFL in that order. The study revealed significant differences between different<br />
agencies based on their EEI values.<br />
T test results for different extension agencies based on EEI values<br />
S. No. Extension Agencies<br />
Comparison<br />
Mean Difference t value Sig. (2-tailed)<br />
1. CFL vs WASSAN -0.591 -9.08 0.001**<br />
2. CFL vs SDA -0.276 -4.12 0.001**<br />
3. WASSAN vs SDA -0.315 -15.50 0.001**<br />
**Significant at 0.01 probability level<br />
Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts<br />
842 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
The major extension approaches that were used to transmit information to farmers are given in<br />
the table. Farmer to Farmer Extension (FFE) followed by demonstrations, training, group<br />
meetings and exposure visits (group approaches) were highly effective extension approaches<br />
in that order.<br />
Effectiveness <strong>of</strong> extension approaches in Anantapuramu district <strong>of</strong> AP.<br />
S. No. Extension Approaches N Mean<br />
1. Demonstrations 120 3.67<br />
2. Trainings 120 2.86<br />
3. Exposure Visits 40 1<br />
4. Group Meetings 80 2.82<br />
5. Farmer-to-Farmer Extension 40 4.9<br />
Results from Ewbank et al. (2007) also concur with our findings. The FFE approach has the<br />
potential <strong>of</strong> supplementing existing extension approaches and improves farmers’ access to<br />
extension services. FFE is effective in serving farmers’ needs, institutionally more sustainable,<br />
comparably inexpensive, and used in areas where it is inadequate or absent <strong>of</strong> government<br />
extension staff. Furthermore, it is also thought to reach and include many poor farmers, thus<br />
increasing the adoption <strong>of</strong> technologies.<br />
Conclusion<br />
In this study, we computed the EEI as well as the extension approaches in the Anantapuramu<br />
district <strong>of</strong> A.P. The EEI was highest for WASSAN. Farmers also expressed that FFE followed<br />
by demonstrations, training, group meetings, and exposure visits were highly effective<br />
extension approaches in the study. It therefore imperative that the agricultural policies <strong>of</strong> A.P.<br />
should be aimed at empowering the Agricultural department, both technically and financially,<br />
to train farmers through FFE, Demonstrations, Trainings, Group meetings and Exposure visits<br />
since these group approaches have proven to be effective in disseminating information to<br />
farmers in real-time Technology-led approaches like Information and Communication<br />
Technologies (ICTs) (like mobile, SMS, individual (individual farmer or household) and mass<br />
media approaches (like TV, radio) was shown less preference by farmers in information<br />
seeking in the study.<br />
References<br />
Ackah-Nyamike, E. E., 2007. Extension programme development and implementation: A<br />
fundamental guide for tertiary students and practitioners. Accra: Sedco Publishing Ltd.<br />
Anandajayasekeram, P., Puskur, R., Sindu, W., and Hoekstra, D. 2008. Concepts and practices<br />
in agricultural extension in developing countries: A source book. Nairobi, Kenya:<br />
843 | Page Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI), Washington, DC, U.S.A, and<br />
International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI).<br />
Ewbank, R., Kasindei, A., Kimaro, F. and Slaa, S. 2007. Farmer Participatory Research in<br />
Northern Tanzania. FARM-Africa Working Paper No. 11.<br />
T6-20P-1118<br />
Performance <strong>of</strong> Frontline Demonstrations in Yield Enhancement <strong>of</strong> Cotton<br />
under Arid Conditions<br />
Arvind Singh Tetarwal*<br />
ICAR-CAZRI, Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Pali-Marwar-306401 (Rajasthan)<br />
*astetarwal@gmail.com<br />
Cotton, Gossypium sp. (Family: Malvaceae) is an important commercial fibre crop grown<br />
under diverse agro-climatic conditions. India ranks first in the world cotton production with 34<br />
million bales from about 12 million hectares. India's average cotton production is 469 kg per<br />
hectare, compared to world average 778 kg ha -1 . Gujarat is a major cotton producing state. In<br />
arid Kutch, Gujarat, the main limiting constraints in cotton production includes low soil<br />
fertility, shortage and poor-quality irrigation water, high prevalence <strong>of</strong> insect-pests and<br />
soilborne diseases etc. The cultivation <strong>of</strong> susceptible hybrids, late planting, inadequate fertiliser<br />
use, and insecticide spraying were some <strong>of</strong> the major abiotic factors for insect-pest outbreaks<br />
(Kranthi, 2015). It was observed that majority <strong>of</strong> farmers did not use improved practices like<br />
quality seed, suitable plant protection measures, balanced fertilization resulting in a wide<br />
extension gap between demonstrated technology and farmers' technique. To bridge that gap,<br />
KVK Bhuj demonstrated improved cotton cultivation technology in various farmers' fields as<br />
FLDs, which focuses on increasing productivity by providing vital inputs as well as improved<br />
packages <strong>of</strong> practices.<br />
Methodology<br />
The current study was conducted by the ICAR-CAZRI, Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Bhuj-Kutch<br />
(Gujarat) during the Kharif, 2018-19 to 2020-21 at farmer’s fields. A total <strong>of</strong> 60 frontline<br />
demonstrations were held throughout a 24-hectare area at different villages <strong>of</strong> the Kutch<br />
district. The soils in the research area were mostly saline and alkaline in nature, with a sandyto-sandy<br />
loam texture and poor in essential micro nutrients and organic carbon. The yield data<br />
was obtained from FLD plots along with local farming practises widely used by farmers in this<br />
region, for comparative analysis. Under demonstration plots, we have provided critical inputs<br />
such as bio-pesticide Beauveria bassiana, traps (pheromone and yellow sticky traps) to manage<br />
the pink bollworm and sucking insects, magnesium sulphate (MgSO4) and technical advice on<br />
integrated crop management (ICM). On the other hand, farmers were allowed to continue with<br />
Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts<br />
844 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
their conventional techniques in the event <strong>of</strong> a local check. Statistical tools such as frequency and<br />
percentage were used to collect, tabulate, and analyse the data. The extension gap, technology gap, and<br />
technology index were calculated using the Samui et al. (2000) equations.<br />
Results<br />
The demonstrations showed that the three-year average production in demonstrated technology (2561<br />
kg ha -1 ) was 13.89% greater than in conventional practise (2241 kg ha -1 ). The extension gap between<br />
improved and conventional practise varied between 312 and 330 kg ha -1 , with an average <strong>of</strong> 320.3 kg<br />
ha -1 . The extension gap was recorded at its lowest (312 kg ha -1 ) in the second year 2019-20, indicating<br />
the greater adoption <strong>of</strong> superior technologies <strong>of</strong> the KVK. The findings <strong>of</strong> Dahiya et al. (2018)<br />
corroborate the conclusions <strong>of</strong> this study. Furthermore, the technology gap was 438.7 kg ha -1 on average<br />
with lowest 327 kg ha -1 recorded in the beginning year (2028-19) <strong>of</strong> the study. The statistics obtained<br />
show that the technology index peaked at 21.23% in 2020-21 and lowest (10.9%) in 2018-19. The<br />
average technology index across the years was 14.62%. A technology's acceptability and practicality<br />
are always inversely related to its technology index value; the higher the acceptance <strong>of</strong> the proven<br />
technology, the lower the technology index value (Sagar and Chandra, 2004).<br />
Conclusion<br />
The use <strong>of</strong> Beauveria bassiana and balanced fertilization contributed to high cotton production at low<br />
cost. It is recommended that strong ties be established with line departments and other agencies in order<br />
to organise FLDs and large-scale capacity development programmes to overcome the extension gap for<br />
better cotton productivity by transferring improved technology to the region.<br />
References<br />
Dahiya, R., Yadav, S. and Yadav, S. 2018. Impact <strong>of</strong> frontline demonstration on cotton production<br />
technology. J. Cotton Res. Dev., 32 (2): 300-305.<br />
Kranthi KR (2015). Cotton statistics and News. Cotton Association <strong>of</strong> India, Mumbai, India.<br />
Sagar RL and Chandra R (2004). Front line demonstration on sesame in West Bengal. Agric Ext Review<br />
16(2): 7-10.<br />
Samui SK, Maitra S, Roy DK, Mandal AK and Saha D (2000). Evaluation <strong>of</strong> front-line demonstration<br />
on groundnut. J Indian Soc Coast Agric Res 18(2): 180-183.<br />
Yield, gap assessment and economic analysis <strong>of</strong> frontline demonstrations on cotton<br />
Year<br />
No. <strong>of</strong><br />
Demo<br />
Demo<br />
(IP)*<br />
Yield<br />
(kg/ha)<br />
Local<br />
(FP)<br />
Yield<br />
(kg/ha)<br />
% Yield<br />
Increase<br />
over FP<br />
Ext<br />
Gap<br />
(kg/ha)<br />
Tech.<br />
Gap<br />
(kg/ha)<br />
Tech.<br />
Index<br />
(%)<br />
Net Return<br />
(Rs/ha)<br />
B:C Ratio<br />
IP* FP IP FP<br />
2018-19 20 2673 2343 14.08 330 327 10.90 101415 84865 3.22 2.93<br />
2019-20 20 2648 2336 13.36 312 352 11.73 100690 85080 3.24 2.96<br />
2020-21 20 2363 2044 14.22 319 637 21.23 82065 65470 2.71 2.39<br />
Average 2561 2241 13.89 320.3 438.7 14.62 94723 78471 3.06 2.76<br />
*IP=Improved Practice; FP= Farmers Practice<br />
845 | Page Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
T6-21P-1138<br />
Sustainable Growth in Agriculture Sector: A Case Study <strong>of</strong> Nalgonda<br />
District, Telangana, India<br />
Harish Balduri* and G. Prabhakar<br />
Geology Department<br />
Osmania University, Hyderabad<br />
*harishbalduri.ougeog@gmail.com, drgprabhakarouhyd@gmail.com<br />
Sustainable agricultural growth is a necessary for the economic growth <strong>of</strong> India. Agriculture<br />
growth is critical for poverty reduction and can be a powerful means <strong>of</strong> achieving economic<br />
growth. The agriculture sector is one <strong>of</strong> the main sectors in India by which agriculture<br />
productivity and rural employment can <strong>of</strong>fer increased income to the poor and provide food<br />
security and income diversification to vulnerable communities. The study focuses on the<br />
Nalgonda district, a rural district with good irrigation sources and favorable climatic conditions.<br />
Approximately 75 per cent <strong>of</strong> the population depends directly or indirectly on agriculture in the<br />
district. The major growing crops are Paddy and Cotton. As per the field observation, the district<br />
has the highest potential for crop cultivation and diversification due to the relatively gentle<br />
topographic condition, favorable soils and higher irrigation facilities <strong>of</strong> Krishna River. The<br />
present study showed that despite several challenges, such as an increase in built-up areas and<br />
scarcity <strong>of</strong> cropland in the study area, there has still been an increase in agricultural productivity<br />
in the last decade. The present study aims to study the sustainable agricultural growth in the<br />
Nalgonda district and propose several measures to guarantee sustainable agricultural growth in<br />
the stud area. The result <strong>of</strong> the study provides an action plan for agricultural researchers,<br />
academia, research institute, government, and non-governmental organizations working in the<br />
agriculture sector.<br />
T6-22P-1164<br />
On Farm Evaluation <strong>of</strong> Farming System Modules for Improving the<br />
Pr<strong>of</strong>itability <strong>of</strong> Small and Marginal Farmers<br />
Y. D. Charjan, R. S. Wankhade, Varsha Tapre, P. N. Magare and A. S. Lawhale<br />
Agriculture Research Station, Achalpur<br />
Dr. Panjabrao Deshmukh Krishi Vidyapeeth, Akola<br />
The Central Vidarbha Zone is the VII th Agro Climatic zone <strong>of</strong> Maharashtra State, this tract has<br />
hot summer, moderate winter and rainy season. Vertisols, Inceptisols and Entisols are the<br />
dominant soil order occurring here. Soil type in the district having deep black, medium deep<br />
black and shallow soils having 427.9, 136.4 and 421.5 (area 000 ha) hectare area with 43.4,<br />
13.8 and 42.7 per cent, respectively. Main agronomical crop <strong>of</strong> this zone are cotton, soybean,<br />
sorghum, pigeon pea in kharif and wheat and gram in rabi season. Nagpur mandarin and<br />
vegetable crops viz., brinjal, tomato grown in Nagpur district. During 2018-19 the experiments<br />
Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts<br />
846 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
were conducted in high (Katol) and low (Narkhed) productive blocks <strong>of</strong> Nagpur district. The<br />
total 36 farmers selected for study accordingly principle component analysis was done.<br />
Systematic integration <strong>of</strong> multiple enterprise system in scientific manner, components needs to<br />
be chosen in such a way that a product <strong>of</strong> on component become the input <strong>of</strong> other, are<br />
complimentary and are organically well inter linked to each other without wastage to meet out<br />
the multiple objective <strong>of</strong> poverty reduction, food security, environmental soundness and<br />
sustainability, especially for small and marginal farmers. After studying typology <strong>of</strong> collected<br />
information <strong>of</strong> selected farmers, components were defined. Increasing income and employment<br />
from small holdings by integrating wages from enterprises and recycling crop residues and byproducts<br />
within farm itself. The type <strong>of</strong> farming system and components presented in the table 1.<br />
Types <strong>of</strong> Farming Systems and Components<br />
Farming<br />
System<br />
(s)<br />
No. <strong>of</strong><br />
households<br />
Mean<br />
holding<br />
size (ha)<br />
Mean<br />
family<br />
size<br />
(no’s)<br />
Components<br />
Cropping systems Livestock Mean total<br />
net income<br />
(Rs)<br />
Crop +Bullock<br />
pair<br />
3 0.93 4<br />
Soy + Pigeon Pea (1)<br />
Soy-ch.pea(1)<br />
soy-wheat(2)<br />
Bullock pair<br />
(1)<br />
95000<br />
Crop+ Dairy 3 1.33 6<br />
Soybean (1)<br />
Cotton-fallow (1)<br />
Soy-ch.pea(1)<br />
soy-wheat(1)<br />
Cow (1) 88333<br />
Crop +<br />
Horticulture<br />
+Dairy and<br />
Bullock pair<br />
6 1.37 5<br />
Cotton-wheat (1)<br />
Cotton-fallow (3)<br />
Soy + Pigeon Pea (2)<br />
Soy-ch.pea(3)<br />
soy-wheat(2)<br />
Cow &<br />
Bullock pair<br />
(1 & 1 )<br />
82333<br />
Benchmark status <strong>of</strong> area & net income from various modules.<br />
Farming System (s)<br />
Benchmark net income (Rs)<br />
Crop Livestock Processing Optional if<br />
any<br />
Total<br />
Crop +Bullock pair 80000 15000 0 0 95000<br />
Crop+ Dairy 66183 22150 0 0 88333<br />
Crop + Horticulture +Dairy<br />
and Bullock pair<br />
57767 24566 0 0 82333<br />
847 | Page Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Salient features <strong>of</strong> interventions for diversification in each module.<br />
Farming<br />
System<br />
Diversification<br />
module<br />
Constraints Interventions Cost <strong>of</strong><br />
interev.<br />
(Rs)<br />
Net<br />
returns<br />
(Rs)<br />
interv.<br />
Crop +<br />
Bullock pair<br />
Crop<br />
Imbalanced Fertilizer<br />
Dose, Monoculturing <strong>of</strong><br />
soybean , High incidence<br />
<strong>of</strong> pest. Sole cropping<br />
Supply Of MAUS 71<br />
var. <strong>of</strong> and JAKI<br />
9218 Soybean and<br />
chickpea var.,<br />
balancing nutrients<br />
1935 141552<br />
Livestock<br />
Unavailability <strong>of</strong> green<br />
fodder, use <strong>of</strong> Local<br />
breed, lack <strong>of</strong> knowledge<br />
about improved breeds,<br />
nutritional, rearing<br />
management and<br />
vaccination schedule<br />
Usmanabadi goat,<br />
(awaited)Hybrid<br />
Napier saplings.<br />
Vaccination,<br />
Deworming<br />
100 2250<br />
Processing<br />
lack <strong>of</strong> knowledge about,<br />
processing <strong>of</strong><br />
fortification, nonavailability<br />
<strong>of</strong> cheap<br />
mineral mixture Partial<br />
decomposed FYM<br />
Fortification <strong>of</strong><br />
wheat flour,<br />
preparation <strong>of</strong><br />
mineral mixture<br />
supply <strong>of</strong> bio agent<br />
for composting.<br />
Preparation.<br />
250<br />
Use at<br />
Own Farm<br />
Optional<br />
Unawareness about use Supply <strong>of</strong> dry land<br />
<strong>of</strong> Farm bunds for minor/ horticultural fruit<br />
dry land horticultural plants saplings.<br />
plants<br />
Supply <strong>of</strong> improved<br />
Local ber, unavailability variety <strong>of</strong> ber bud<br />
<strong>of</strong> fresh vegetable around and Bio<br />
the year.<br />
decomposers.<br />
720 3225<br />
Crop+<br />
Dairy<br />
Crop<br />
Imbalanced Fertilizer<br />
Dose, Mono-culturing <strong>of</strong><br />
soybean, High incidence<br />
<strong>of</strong> pest and disease, Sole<br />
cropping<br />
Supply Of Js 9305<br />
var. <strong>of</strong> and Wheat<br />
var. AKW<br />
1071Soybean,<br />
balancing nutrients ,<br />
8985 118657<br />
Livestock<br />
Unavailability <strong>of</strong> mineral Usmanabadi goat,<br />
mixtures, vaccination and (awaited) Hybrid<br />
green<br />
fodder throughout year<br />
Napier saplings.<br />
Vaccination,<br />
lack <strong>of</strong> knowledge about Deworming 617 8710<br />
improved breeds,<br />
nutritional, rearing<br />
management and<br />
vaccination schedule<br />
Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts<br />
848 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Processing<br />
lack <strong>of</strong> knowledge about,<br />
processing <strong>of</strong><br />
fortification, nonavailability<br />
<strong>of</strong> cheap<br />
mineral mixture, Partial<br />
decomposed FYM<br />
Fortification <strong>of</strong><br />
wheat flour,<br />
preparation <strong>of</strong><br />
mineral mixture,<br />
supply <strong>of</strong> bio agent<br />
for composting.<br />
Preparation<br />
250<br />
Use at<br />
Own Farm<br />
Optional<br />
Unawareness about use Supply <strong>of</strong> dry land<br />
<strong>of</strong> Farm bunds for minor/ horticultural fruit<br />
dry land horticultural plants saplings.<br />
plants<br />
Supply <strong>of</strong> improved<br />
Local ber, unavailability variety <strong>of</strong> ber bud<br />
<strong>of</strong> fresh vegetable around and Bio<br />
the year.<br />
decomposers.<br />
720 2490<br />
Crop +<br />
Horticulture<br />
+Dairy and<br />
Bullock pair<br />
Crop<br />
Imbalanced Fertilizer<br />
Dose, Mono-culturing <strong>of</strong><br />
soybean,<br />
Supply Of MAUS 71<br />
var. <strong>of</strong> 3722<br />
Soybean, balancing<br />
nutrients, in<br />
8717 130283<br />
Horticulture<br />
Supply <strong>of</strong> disease<br />
resistant planting<br />
material and<br />
phytophthera<br />
management kit<br />
Intercropped with high<br />
valued vegetable crops.<br />
Supply20 saplings <strong>of</strong><br />
disease resistant<br />
from Genuine<br />
source. Neem cake<br />
300 kg, Metalaxil M-<br />
72 20 gm, 1 kg, SSP<br />
and ammonium<br />
sulphate, 500gm<br />
MOP 20kg,<br />
potassium<br />
paramagnet 12.5gm,<br />
copper sulphate100<br />
gm calcium<br />
carbonate 100gm,<br />
and trichoderma<br />
100gm. supply <strong>of</strong><br />
seedlings or seed <strong>of</strong><br />
improved variety <strong>of</strong><br />
cabbage, pusa drum<br />
head or available in<br />
market<br />
Livestock<br />
vaccination, and green<br />
fodder throughout year<br />
lack <strong>of</strong> knowledge about<br />
improved breeds,<br />
nutritional, rearing<br />
management and<br />
vaccination schedule<br />
Usmanabadi goat,<br />
(awaited) supply <strong>of</strong><br />
hybrid Napier<br />
saplings.<br />
Vaccination,<br />
Deworming supply<br />
<strong>of</strong><br />
790 9600<br />
849 | Page Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Processing<br />
Non availability <strong>of</strong> cheap<br />
mineral mixture, Partial<br />
decomposed FYM<br />
Preparation <strong>of</strong><br />
mineral mixture,<br />
supply <strong>of</strong> bio agent<br />
for composting.<br />
Preparation.<br />
250<br />
Use at<br />
Own Farm<br />
optional<br />
Unawareness about use<br />
<strong>of</strong> Farm bunds for minor/<br />
dry land horticultural<br />
plants<br />
Local ber, unavailability<br />
<strong>of</strong> fresh vegetable around<br />
the year. Mismanagement<br />
<strong>of</strong> compost<br />
Fortification <strong>of</strong><br />
wheat flour,<br />
preparation <strong>of</strong><br />
mineral mixture.<br />
Supply <strong>of</strong> seeds for<br />
kitchen gardening.<br />
Training on methods<br />
<strong>of</strong> compost making<br />
Improvement <strong>of</strong> total net income (Rs)<br />
520 1000<br />
Farming Systems<br />
Holding<br />
size (ha)<br />
Benchmark<br />
Net income (Rs)<br />
(From 0.20 ha )<br />
First year<br />
Crop +Bullock pair 0.93 95000 141552<br />
Crop+ Dairy 1.33 88333 118657<br />
Crop + Horticulture +Dairy and Bullock<br />
pair<br />
1.37 82333 130283<br />
Use <strong>of</strong> improvement in existing farming system and diversification in components <strong>of</strong> farming system<br />
showed rise in net income <strong>of</strong> farmers over farmers practice which they adopted earlier. A highest net<br />
monetary return <strong>of</strong> Rs.141552 was recorded by field crop + Bullock pair farming system. In the studied<br />
group <strong>of</strong> farmers the Field crop +Horticulture + Dairy and Bullock pair is second highest pr<strong>of</strong>itable<br />
farming system. This System recorded Rs. 130283 net monetary returns over before intervention in the<br />
various components <strong>of</strong> Field crop +Horticulture + Dairy and Bullock pair farming system. Part <strong>of</strong><br />
expenditure on livestock and on-farm processing and optional module was made in this year but results<br />
are awaited. Complete expenditure on these modules i.e. on livestock, optional module in both the<br />
blocks is not completed. Lower increase i.e. only 34 % increase was observed in Field crop + Dairy<br />
farming system after intervention in crop + Dairy components. However, income was raised by farmers<br />
due to adopting the diversification in cropping system.<br />
Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts<br />
850 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
T6-23P-1182<br />
Evaluation <strong>of</strong> Suitable Cropping Sequence for Dry Tracts in Prakasam<br />
District <strong>of</strong> Andhra Pradesh<br />
L. Rajesh Chowdary, S. Bharathi and G. Subba Rao<br />
Agricultural Research Station Darsi, Prakasam, Andhra Pradesh<br />
ars.darsi@angrau.ac.in<br />
Proper use <strong>of</strong> the vital natural resources influences the existence <strong>of</strong> life systems and socioeconomic<br />
development <strong>of</strong> any country. Land suitability evaluation is the process <strong>of</strong><br />
estimating the potential <strong>of</strong> land for land use planning (Sys et al. 1991). Continuous growing<br />
<strong>of</strong> same crop on the same field cause deficiency <strong>of</strong> a particular nutrient in the soil due to<br />
continuous removal <strong>of</strong> a specific nutrient from a specific depth <strong>of</strong> the soil, also cause<br />
dominance <strong>of</strong> a particular insect or disease or weed in crop because <strong>of</strong> continuous available<br />
favourable conditions and host plant which leads severe reduction in crop yield. Since long,<br />
conventional cropping <strong>of</strong> rice under medium to heavy textured soils under bore wells and<br />
single crop <strong>of</strong> pigeonpea or fallow. Bengal gram or single crop <strong>of</strong> bajra/foxtail millet in light<br />
textured soils under rainfed conditions is being followed in most <strong>of</strong> the areas <strong>of</strong> Prakasam<br />
district. However, each plant species requires specific soil and climatic conditions for its<br />
optimum growth. Information on crop sequence suitability in dry tracts <strong>of</strong> Prakasam district<br />
in particular and in Andhra Pradesh in general is very much scanty. In India, it is observed<br />
that the area and production <strong>of</strong> millets has decreased and this might be due to lack <strong>of</strong><br />
remunerative prices, timely marketing facilities and hence diversifying to commercial crops<br />
like cotton, chillies, maize and maize-based cropping systems. To achieve sustainable<br />
production in terms <strong>of</strong> ecological, economical and biological sustainability millet-based<br />
cropping systems can be followed (Chandra et al., 2013). Millets are mainly cultivated as<br />
single crop during Kharif in Prakasam district under rainfed conditions with minimum<br />
management and the fields are left fallow during Rabi. Hence, an attempt has been made to<br />
evaluate the suitable millet-based cropping sequence in dry tracts <strong>of</strong> Prakasam district,<br />
Andhra Pradesh to utilize the available resources and improve the socio- economic status <strong>of</strong><br />
dry land farmers.<br />
Methodology<br />
Agricultural Research Station, Darsi is located in between 14 o 57′ and 16 o 17′ North latitude<br />
and 78 o 43′ and 80 o 25′ East longitude. The climate is semi-arid with distinct summer, winter<br />
and rainy seasons. The field experiment was conducted for two consecutive years at<br />
Agricultural Research Station, Darsi during 2017-18 and 2018-19. The soil at the<br />
experimental site in sandy loam in texture and low in organic carbon content (0.20%). The<br />
experiment was laid out in Randomized Block Design with three replications. The<br />
experiment comprised <strong>of</strong> nine treatments (foxtail millet-bengalgram, foxtail millet -cowpea,<br />
851 | Page Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
foxtail millet -safflower, bajra-bengalgram, bajra -cowpea, bajra –safflower, finger milletbengalgram,<br />
finger millet –cowpea and finger millet -safflower) having different crop<br />
sequences <strong>of</strong> which first crop was sown during Kharif and second crop in Rabi with a<br />
recommended spacing <strong>of</strong> 30 cm x10 cm. The varieties Suryanandi (foxtail millet),<br />
Champavathi (finger millet) and bajra (ABV-5) were used during Kharif and during Rabi<br />
cowpea (TPT-5), safflower (Local) and JG-11 (bengalgram) were used in the two years <strong>of</strong><br />
study. Observations on yield was recorded and equivalent yields along with net returns and<br />
B: C ratio was computed.<br />
Results<br />
The compiled data <strong>of</strong> the two years study revealed that among the Kharif crops (foxtail<br />
millet, bajra, finger millet) the maximum bajra equivalent yield was recorded in bajra (2706-<br />
2753 kg/ha) followed by foxtail (2487- 2574 kg/ha) and lowest in finger millet (2097-2255<br />
kg/ha). In Rabi crops highest cowpea equivalent yield was recorded in cowpea (1030-1293<br />
kg/ha) followed by bengalgram and safflower. Among the different crop sequences<br />
evaluated maximum system yield was recorded with bajra- cowpea sequence (4032 kg/ha)<br />
followed by bajra-bengalgram (3827 kg/ha) and was significantly superior over the other<br />
crop sequences with net returns <strong>of</strong> 65181 Rs/ha (B: C ratio 2.41), 55319 Rs/ha (B: ratio 2.14)<br />
respectively.Similarly, higher system productivity in terms <strong>of</strong> bengalgram equivalent yield<br />
was also reported by Lal et al. (2004) in a millet-bengalgram crop sequence.<br />
System yield (kg/ha), net returns (Rs) and benefit cost ratio as influenced by different<br />
crop sequences<br />
Bajra Cowpea<br />
Crop equivalent equivalent<br />
System Gross<br />
Net Returns<br />
sequences yield kg/ha yield kg/ha<br />
yield Returns<br />
B:C Ratio<br />
(Rs/ha)<br />
(kg/ha) (Rs/ha)<br />
(Kharif) (Rabi)<br />
Foxtail<br />
millet-<br />
Bengalgram<br />
Foxtail<br />
millet -<br />
Cowpea<br />
Foxtail<br />
millet -<br />
Safflower<br />
Bajra-<br />
Bengalgram<br />
Bajra-<br />
Cowpea<br />
Bajra-<br />
Safflower<br />
2574 1005 3579 96264 47864 1.99<br />
2487 1030 3517 95487 49137 2.06<br />
2533 415 2948 70623 26323 1.59<br />
2715 1112 3827 103719 55319 2.14<br />
2753 1279 4032 111531 65181 2.41<br />
2706 404 3110 73794 29494 1.67<br />
Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts<br />
852 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Finger<br />
millet-<br />
Bengalgram<br />
Finger<br />
millet-<br />
Cowpea<br />
Finger<br />
millet-<br />
Safflower<br />
2255 957 3212 87549 39149 1.81<br />
2097 1293 3390 98343 51993 2.12<br />
2144 397 2541 61698 17398 1.39<br />
S.Em ± 72.30 17.25 90.95<br />
CD (0.05) 215.90 55.78 274.68<br />
CV (%) 13.50 12.77 18.25<br />
Price (Rs/q): foxtail millet-2100, bajra-2100, finger millet-1930, bengalgram-3800, cowpea-<br />
4200, safflower-2100<br />
Conclusion<br />
Bajra-cowpea and bajra-bengal gram were found to be most pr<strong>of</strong>itable cropping sequences<br />
evaluated in terms <strong>of</strong> bajra equivalent yields and ne returns.<br />
References<br />
Chandra, A., Kandari, L.S., Vikram, S.N., Maikhuri, R.K., and Rao, K.S., 2013, Role <strong>of</strong><br />
Intercropping on production and land use efficiency in the central Himalaya, India.<br />
India. Environ. We Int. J. Sci. Tech., 8(2): 105-113.<br />
Lal, M., D.S. Bhati and A.K. Nag. 2004. Economics and production potential <strong>of</strong> different<br />
cropping sequence on farmers’ field. Journal <strong>of</strong> Eco-Physiology. 7(3/4): 143–145.<br />
Sys, C., Van Ranst, E., Debaveye, J., 1991, Land evaluation, Part 2 Methods in Land<br />
Evaluation. Agricultural Publications No.7, Belgium.<br />
T6-24P-1200<br />
Dynamics <strong>of</strong> Agricultural Land Use in Kerala - A Socio-Ecological<br />
Perspective<br />
Rose Mathews, Binoo P Bonny and Marneni Divya Sree<br />
Department <strong>of</strong> Agricultural Extension, College <strong>of</strong> Agriculture, Vellanikkara, Kerala<br />
Agricultural University-680656<br />
The total geographical area <strong>of</strong> Kerala is 38.86 lakh ha, out <strong>of</strong> which the area under agriculture<br />
accounts for 52.13 per cent (GoK, 2022). Though agriculture continues to be the major land<br />
use form in the state, the net sown area shows a declining trend. The objectives <strong>of</strong> the study are<br />
853 | Page Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
a) to delineate trends in agricultural land transition in Kerala and b) to identify socio-ecological<br />
determinants <strong>of</strong> agricultural land use change in Kerala.<br />
Methodology<br />
Ten food crops viz. Rice, sugarcane, pepper, ginger, turmeric, cardamom, areca nut, tapioca,<br />
banana and other plantains and cashew, and five non-food crops, viz. sesamum, coconut, tea,<br />
c<strong>of</strong>fee and rubber were selected for the study. Data on the area under food crops and non-food<br />
crops were collected from the India stat website and <strong>of</strong> the department <strong>of</strong> economics and<br />
statistics.<br />
Results<br />
The significant changes in the land use pattern <strong>of</strong> Kerala are the shift from cultivation <strong>of</strong> food<br />
crops to non-food crops, increase in area under non-agricultural use and fallowing <strong>of</strong><br />
agricultural land. It is evident from Fig. that over the years, the area under food crops has<br />
declined while that <strong>of</strong> non-food crops has increased. The area under food crops started<br />
declining during 1970-71 and 1980-81, while the area under non-food crops during the period<br />
started increasing. The area under non-food crops crossed the food crops in 1990-91. Similar<br />
trend was observed during 1990-91 to 2000-2001. From 2000-01 to 2010-11, the area under<br />
both food and non-food crops decreased, and from 2010-11 to 2019-20 the area under food<br />
crops continued to decrease, and the area under non-food crops remained stagnant (Fig). The<br />
agricultural land in the state has been converted for non-agricultural purposes like residential<br />
plots, real estate assets and mining and quarrying. There is a massive leap in the land put to<br />
non-agricultural purposes in the state. The land put to non-agricultural purposes, which stood<br />
at 275000 ha. in 1970-71 increased to 455897 ha in 2019-20. (GoK, 2022). Another important<br />
land<br />
2000000<br />
1500000<br />
1000000<br />
500000<br />
0<br />
1970-71 1980-81 1990-91 2000-01 2010-11 2019-20<br />
Food crops<br />
Non food crops<br />
Fig: Area under food crops and non-food crops -Kerala<br />
transition in the state is land fallowing. The land under current fallow, and fallow other than<br />
current fallow in 1970-71 has increased from 24000 ha and 22000 ha to 57387 ha and 46931<br />
ha, respectively in 2019-20 (GoK, 2022). Agricultural land-use decisions are mostly influenced<br />
by social and ecological determinants. The major social determinants <strong>of</strong> farmland transitions<br />
in Kerala are the conducive political power system favouring land reforms, dynamics <strong>of</strong><br />
Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts<br />
854 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
production and market, changes in family structure, wage structure and labour policies,<br />
migration, food security assurance programmes and urbanization.<br />
The implementation <strong>of</strong> land reform acts led to extreme land fragmentation, which impacted the<br />
scale <strong>of</strong> production turning agriculture into a low-pr<strong>of</strong>it venture. This also resulted in an<br />
alienation from farming, a shift to less labour-intensive crops and increased agricultural land<br />
fallowing (Kumar and Harilal, 2014). The wage rate in Kerala is higher than the average<br />
national wage rate. This has resulted in higher rates <strong>of</strong> land conversion, especially among<br />
marginal farmers, from labour-intensive crops like paddy to less labour-intensive crops.<br />
Change in family structure from joint to nuclear family resulted in the redistribution <strong>of</strong><br />
property, which led to the fragmentation <strong>of</strong> the land holdings and reduced family labour supply.<br />
Migration has resulted in absentee landlordism, and land has become a speculative asset.<br />
Migration from other states to Kerala could not contribute much to the agriculture sector. There<br />
are 31.5 lakhs migrant labourers in the state, out <strong>of</strong> which only 2.9 lakhs are employed in<br />
agriculture (Parida and Raman, 2021). The strong network <strong>of</strong> assured food supply through the<br />
public distribution system made food crops a less priority sector in agriculture. Urbanization<br />
in Kerala has also led to increased land value, agricultural land conversions and an increased<br />
number <strong>of</strong> built-ups.<br />
The primary ecological determinants <strong>of</strong> farmland transition in Kerala are climate change,<br />
edaphic factors, invasive weeds and pests. Non-uniform rainfall patterns, extreme dry spells,<br />
floods and landslides limit farming activities. However, concerted efforts have been made to<br />
combat the receding agricultural land in the state. The major programmes and policies in<br />
response to changing land use in the state include the Kerala conservation <strong>of</strong> paddy land and<br />
wetland act (2008), agro ecological zone-based planning and development (2012), Haritha<br />
Keralam Mission (2016), Subhiksha Keralam (2021) and Njangalum krishiyilekk (2022).<br />
Conclusion<br />
Significant changes in agriculture land use in Kerala are conversion <strong>of</strong> food crops to cash crops<br />
area, conversion to non-agricultural purposes, and increased land fallow. Social and ecological<br />
determinants influence land use decisions. It could be concluded that agriculture needs to be<br />
considered as a socio-ecological system wherein a balance between social and environmental<br />
determinants is required to attain long-term sustainability.<br />
References<br />
GoK [Government <strong>of</strong> Kerala]. 2022. Economic Review 2021. Kerala State Planning Board,<br />
Government <strong>of</strong> Kerala, Thiruvananthapuram, 65pp.<br />
Kumar, E G., and Harilal, C.C., 2014. Land reforms and agrarian relations in the state <strong>of</strong> Kerala,<br />
India - a socio-economic evaluation. Ind. J. Ecol. 41, (2): 344-348.<br />
855 | Page Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Parida, J.K., and Raman, K. R., 2021. A study on In-Migration, Informal Employment and<br />
Urbanization in Kerala. Kerala State Planning Board, Government <strong>of</strong> Kerala,<br />
Thiruvananthapuram, 101pp.<br />
Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts<br />
T6-25P-1204<br />
Socio-Economic Pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> Farmers <strong>of</strong> North Alluvial Plane <strong>of</strong> Bihar<br />
Amrendra Kumar * , Anjani Kumar, Sudeepa Kumari Jha, Rabindra Kumar,<br />
Sumit Kumar Singh and Priyanka Kumari<br />
ICAR-Agricultural Technology Application Research Institute, Patna-14<br />
*amrendra14d@gmail.com<br />
The economic condition <strong>of</strong> farmers in Bihar is totally dependent on cultivation <strong>of</strong> field crops<br />
and allied activities. Most <strong>of</strong> the population is engaged in farming completely linked to the<br />
agriculture and its associated activities only few engaged in other activities (MGNREGA, small<br />
vender etc.). (Vijoy, 2014). Cropping system <strong>of</strong> north Bihar is pre-dominated by cereal crop<br />
(rice-wheat) but slight change was noticed in cropping pattern during last four decade.<br />
Production and productivity <strong>of</strong> all the principal crops were increased but performance <strong>of</strong> rice<br />
which is staple food crop <strong>of</strong> the region, has been impressive in irrigated field but in rainfed and<br />
water-logged situation condition are still alarming. Maize cultivation and its productivity<br />
increased due to adoption <strong>of</strong> Rabi maize and hybrid variety introduction in large scale.<br />
However, pulses and oilseeds production witnessed a setback due to decline in area and almost<br />
stagnant productivity (Kumar et al., 2017). The major constrain for crop grower farmers are<br />
small and fragmented land holding, non- availability <strong>of</strong> seed/planting material, high cost <strong>of</strong><br />
input, high incidence <strong>of</strong> pest and diseases and less mechanization. In case <strong>of</strong> livestock<br />
production: infertility, lack <strong>of</strong> proper dairy management practices, non-availability <strong>of</strong> improved<br />
breed, lack <strong>of</strong> balancing food are the major one (Bhutia et al., 2017).<br />
Methodology<br />
A survey programme organized under New Extension Methodology and Approaches (NEMA)<br />
program to study the socio-economic pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> farmers <strong>of</strong> zone I (north alluvial plane) in the<br />
year 2019. KVKs <strong>of</strong> three districts viz; West Champaran, Sheohar and Begusarai which are<br />
located in north, central and south portion <strong>of</strong> the zone were selected. Total 645 respondent were<br />
participated from which 121, 136 and 418 were from Sheohar, Begusarai and West Champaran,<br />
respectively.<br />
Results<br />
On the basis <strong>of</strong> data collected as seen in table, it was found that in most <strong>of</strong> the family head<br />
involve in agriculture was male member (80.93 %) and female as head was only (19.07 %).<br />
Based on land holding classification out <strong>of</strong> 645 farmers, 188 farmers belong to marginal class,<br />
856 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
163 in small. Education is one <strong>of</strong> the important socio-economic factors which is related to<br />
understanding and technology adoption. It was found that 51.78 % farmers had formal<br />
schooling maximum upto 10 th standard only. Most <strong>of</strong> the participant under the study belongs<br />
to either middle (35.35 %) or old (37.36 %) age group. About 50 per cent <strong>of</strong> respondent resides<br />
in those area which is 5 to 10 km away from market. 37.36 per cent people harness the benefit<br />
<strong>of</strong> market in vicinity <strong>of</strong> 5 km and 12.72 per cent farmers could not take the benefit <strong>of</strong> market<br />
as it was quite away. Thus, people who resides in nearby market avail area gets more benefits.<br />
61.86 % participant lives in radius <strong>of</strong> 10 km <strong>of</strong> extension service provider. Majority <strong>of</strong> the<br />
farmers (77.36 %) had less than one lakh annual income and only few have (7.60 %) had more<br />
than 1.5 lakh.<br />
Socio-economic pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> farmers<br />
Trait Category No. Per cent Cumulative (%)<br />
Categories <strong>of</strong><br />
Farmer<br />
Education<br />
Age Group<br />
Distance <strong>of</strong><br />
Market<br />
Distance From<br />
Nearest Extension<br />
Service Provider<br />
Male 522 80.93<br />
Female 123 19.07<br />
Marginal (< 1 ha) 188 29.15 29.15<br />
Small (1-2 ha) 163 25.27 54.42<br />
Semi-Medium (2-<br />
4 ha)<br />
145<br />
22.48<br />
76.90<br />
Medium (4-10 ha) 118 18.29 95.19<br />
Large (>10 ha) 31 4.81 100.00<br />
Illiterate 54 8.37 8.37<br />
No Formal<br />
Schooling<br />
115<br />
17.83<br />
26.20<br />
Formal 334 51.78 77.98<br />
Matric 96 14.89 92.87<br />
Graduate 46 7.13 100.00<br />
Young (< 35<br />
year)<br />
Middle (35-45<br />
year)<br />
176<br />
228<br />
27.29<br />
35.35<br />
27.29<br />
62.64<br />
Old (> 45 year) 241 37.36 100.00<br />
Upto 5 Km 241 37.36 37.36<br />
5-10 Km 322 49.92 87.28<br />
10-15 Km 51 7.91 95.19<br />
15 -20 Km 31 4.81 100.00<br />
Upto 10 Km 399 61.86 61.86<br />
10-20 Km 214 33.18 95.04<br />
20-30 Km 26 4.03 99.07<br />
More Than 30<br />
Km<br />
6<br />
0.93<br />
100.00<br />
857 | Page Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Plant Protection 314 48.68<br />
Equipment<br />
Annual Income<br />
per family (Rs.)<br />
Irrigation 241 37.36<br />
Drip 5 0.78<br />
Sprinkle 1 0.16<br />
Tillage 108 16.74<br />
Tractor 77 11.94<br />
Harvesting 17 2.64<br />
Upto 50000 102 15.81 15.81<br />
50000 -1 Lakh 397 61.55 77.36<br />
1.0 -1.5 Lakh 97 15.04 92.40<br />
≥ 1.5 Lakh 49 7.60 100.00<br />
Conclusion<br />
From the survey it was concluded that small and fragmented land, less education and<br />
dominance <strong>of</strong> male in agriculture system are the major constrain. In spite <strong>of</strong> the many<br />
governments scheme running the socio-economic condition <strong>of</strong> the farmers not raised to an<br />
expected level among the study group.<br />
References<br />
Bhutia, T. L., Kumari, K. R., Snatashree, M. and Kumar, U. 2017. Constrain analysis in the<br />
crop-livestock farming system <strong>of</strong> small and marginal farmers <strong>of</strong> Bihar. SKUAST<br />
J. Res. 19(1): 92-96.<br />
Kumar, A., Singh, R. K. P., Bharati, R. C., Chandra, N. and Kumar, U. 2017. Growth<br />
Performance <strong>of</strong> Principal Crops in North Bihar during last four decades: Empirical<br />
Evidences. J. AgriSearch. 4 (2): 154-159.<br />
Vijoy, P. 2014. Agricultural development and out migration in Bihar. Int. j. economics<br />
commerce manag. 4(5): 30-33.<br />
Organisational Dynamics <strong>of</strong> FPCS for Good Management<br />
Akhil Ajith and Binoo P. Bonny<br />
College <strong>of</strong> Agriculture (KAU), Vellanikkara 680656, Kerala, India<br />
T6-26P-1209<br />
The rise <strong>of</strong> Farmer Producer Companies (FPCs) has enabled farmers to increase productivity<br />
through efficient, cost-effective and sustainable resource use and to realize higher returns for<br />
the produce. Understanding the growing relevance, the GOI to promote FPCs allocated a<br />
budget <strong>of</strong> 200 crore rupees in 2014 under the Producer Organization Development and<br />
Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts<br />
858 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Upliftment Corpus (PRODUCE) Fund through NABARD. As a result <strong>of</strong> such national<br />
initiatives, 7374 FPCs have been registered till March 2019 (Neti et al., 2019). Though the first<br />
FPC in Kerala, IOFPCL was registered in 2004, the idea gained momentum in the state only<br />
2013 onwards. The growth trend, which could be attributed to the support <strong>of</strong> NABARD grants<br />
indicated maximum registration in the year 2016. But the registrations reduced to zero in the<br />
terminal year <strong>of</strong> the NABARD project, 2018. However, a consistent increase in FPC<br />
registrations from 2019 could be noted and with the advent <strong>of</strong> new policy regime announced<br />
in Union budget which is expected to grow further (GOI, 2019).<br />
Even though there was a steady increase the FPCs, which acts as an effective linkage between<br />
farm production and the market, FPCs face many constraints in its formation, functioning, and<br />
service delivery. This is evident from the reports that many registered producer companies<br />
could not continue their operations due to technological, marketing, and policy constraints<br />
(Thamban et al., 2020). In this context it is important to understand the interrelations and<br />
influence <strong>of</strong> organisational attributes such as turnover, membership, age <strong>of</strong> FPC, infrastructure,<br />
and machinery which are represented by nominal categorical data sets.<br />
Methodology<br />
A total <strong>of</strong> 30 FPOs that were in operation for at least two years from the date <strong>of</strong> registration<br />
were selected randomly from all the 14 districts <strong>of</strong> Kerala. The number <strong>of</strong> FPCs selected from<br />
a district was decided proportionate to the number <strong>of</strong> FPCs registered in the district. A<br />
quantitative survey design was employed in data collection. A pretested structured interview<br />
schedule prepared based on expert discussions and literature review was used in the research.<br />
Due to the Covid-19 pandemic and enforcement <strong>of</strong> COVID protocols and restrictions, prefixed<br />
telephonic interviews and video calls were also used for data collection in unavoidable<br />
circumstances. Multi Coordinate Analysis was used in the study as a statistical visualisation<br />
tool for visualising the relationship between organisational attributed represented by categorical<br />
variable levels. This method could evaluate two-way and multi-way data. The visualisation <strong>of</strong><br />
the associations was done using the biplots obtained as result <strong>of</strong> plotting the first two<br />
components contributing the maximum variance.<br />
Categories <strong>of</strong> variables evaluated using MCA<br />
Variable Category 1 Category 2<br />
Age <strong>of</strong> FPC Mature Nascent<br />
Turnover High Low<br />
Membership High Low<br />
Machinery More Less<br />
Infrastructure Good Poor<br />
Performance Good Poor<br />
859 | Page Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Results<br />
The influence <strong>of</strong> categorical variables <strong>of</strong> FPCs on performance was revealed through the MCA<br />
analysis. The results from the column plot indicated that poor and good performances were<br />
most distant from the origin along the horizontal axis for component 1. This corresponded well<br />
with the relatively high contribution for these categories for component 1. Also, low turnover<br />
and high turnover, low machinery, as well as more machinery, were on opposite sides <strong>of</strong> the<br />
origin which indicated that the component 1 contrasted on these category values. Component<br />
2 is represented on the vertical axis. The matured category was located far from the other<br />
categories on one side <strong>of</strong> the vertical axis. Therefore, on component 2 matured FPCs contrasted<br />
with other categories.<br />
Conclusion<br />
The association between the selected categorical pairs <strong>of</strong> variables with categories <strong>of</strong><br />
performance and age <strong>of</strong> the FPC was noted. The study revealed that nascent FPCs performed<br />
better with more machinery, good infrastructure and higher turnovers. Hence for nascent FPCs,<br />
streamlining the activities with envisaging the improvement the machinery and infrastructure<br />
and turnover is recommended rather than membership enhancement. On contrary in order to<br />
improve the performance <strong>of</strong> the matured FPCs membership enhancement was key.<br />
References<br />
Bi- plot <strong>of</strong> categorical attributes<br />
GOI [Government <strong>of</strong> India]. 2019. Strategy Paper for promotion <strong>of</strong> 10,000 Farmer Producer<br />
Organisations (FPOs). New Delhi: Small Farmers' Agribusiness Consortium (SFAC), p.34.<br />
Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts<br />
860 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Neti, A., Govil, R., and Rao, M. R. 2019. Farmer producer companies in India: Demystifying the<br />
numbers. Rev. Agrarian Stud. 9(2369-2020-1967).<br />
Thamban, C., Jayasekhar, S., Chandran, K. P. and Rajesh, M. K., 2020. Sustainability <strong>of</strong> Farmer<br />
Producer Organisations-The case <strong>of</strong> producer organisations involved in the production and<br />
marketing <strong>of</strong> ‘neera’in the coconut sector in Kerala, India. J. Plant. Crops. 48(2):150-159.<br />
T6-27P-1236<br />
Identification <strong>of</strong> Suitable Varieties and Dates <strong>of</strong> Sowing in Cowpea for<br />
Prakasam District<br />
S. Bharathi, L. Rajesh Chowdary and G. Subba Rao<br />
Agricultural Research Station Darsi, Prakasam, Andhra Pradesh<br />
ars.darsi@angrau.ac.in<br />
Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.) is one <strong>of</strong> the versatile leguminous vegetable having much more<br />
protein than other vegetables and it thrives well in warm weather due to its drought-tolerant<br />
capacity. Cowpea is adaptable to hostile environments due to its morphological as well as<br />
biochemical qualities. This crop does not require a high rate <strong>of</strong> nitrogen fertilization as its roots<br />
have nodules contain bacteria called Rhizobiaum helps to fix nitrogen from the air (Shiringani<br />
and Shimeles, 2011). In India, despite the fact that a large number <strong>of</strong> varieties/hybrids and agrotechniques<br />
have been developed, but the productivity <strong>of</strong> cowpea has still not reached the<br />
desired level. Varietal differences <strong>of</strong> cowpea in terms <strong>of</strong> growth pattern and duration for seed<br />
maturity are extremely diverse from plant to plant, making breeding programs for cowpea more<br />
complex than other crops. There are diverse cowpea genotypes demanding a site specific<br />
directed management approach and choice <strong>of</strong> proper sowing window and selection <strong>of</strong> best<br />
adapted genotype. Suitable time <strong>of</strong> sowing provides optimum growing conditions with<br />
favourable temperature, light, humidity and rainfall during the growth phase <strong>of</strong> the crop. This<br />
ultimately decides the selection <strong>of</strong> varieties for particular or different dates <strong>of</strong> sowing to<br />
stabilize or to get higher yields.<br />
Methodology<br />
The field trial was conducted for two years during Rabi, 2018-19 and 2019-20 under rainfed<br />
conditions at Agricultural Research Station, Darsi. The experiment was planned with three<br />
cowpea varieties viz., TPT-1, Local brown and Local bold white (Meghana) and four dates <strong>of</strong><br />
sowing viz., D 1- 2 nd fortnight <strong>of</strong> September, D 2- 1 st fortnight <strong>of</strong> October, D 3- 2 nd fortnight <strong>of</strong><br />
October and D4- 1 st fortnight <strong>of</strong> November. The experiment was laid out in split plot design<br />
with three replications. The main plots were four dates <strong>of</strong> sowing and sub plots were three<br />
varieties. The observations on plant height, number <strong>of</strong> branches, number <strong>of</strong> pods per plant, seed<br />
yield were recorded.<br />
861 | Page Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Results<br />
The dates <strong>of</strong> sowing showed significant effect on growth and yield <strong>of</strong> the cowpea varieties<br />
tested. There was gradual decrease in the plant height with the progress <strong>of</strong> sowing dates tested.<br />
Maximum plant height <strong>of</strong> 94.45 cm was recorded in crop sown during 2 nd fortnight <strong>of</strong><br />
September followed by 1 st fortnight <strong>of</strong> October (64.70 cm). Lowest plant height <strong>of</strong> 39.25 cm<br />
was recorded in the November 1 st fortnight sown crop. In present investigation September<br />
second fortnight sown crop produced significantly maximum seed yield (1367 kg ha -1 ) and was<br />
on par with sowing <strong>of</strong> October first fortnight (1285 kg/ha) and was significantly superior to the<br />
other two dates <strong>of</strong> sowing tested. The three varieties tested recorded similar plant height and<br />
number <strong>of</strong> branches per plant. Tirupati-1 recorded highest seed yield <strong>of</strong> 1323 kg/ha and was<br />
significantly superior over Local brown (1159 kg/ha) and Local bold white (Meghana) 906<br />
kg/ha. The higher seed yield obtained in early sown crop might be due to higher available soil<br />
moisture during cropping period as a result <strong>of</strong> receipt <strong>of</strong> well distributed rainfall (Rima<br />
Taipodia and Nabam, 2013). Similarly, Prabhamani and Potdar (2018) also recorded higher<br />
seed yield, haulm yield and B:C ratio in cowpea sown at early dates during Rabi. Interactions<br />
were non-significant.<br />
Yield attributes and seed yield <strong>of</strong> cowpea as influenced by different dates <strong>of</strong> sowing and varieties<br />
Dates <strong>of</strong> sowing<br />
2 nd fortnight <strong>of</strong><br />
September<br />
1 st fortnight <strong>of</strong><br />
October<br />
2 nd fortnight <strong>of</strong><br />
October<br />
1 st fortnight <strong>of</strong><br />
November<br />
Plant height<br />
(cm)<br />
No <strong>of</strong><br />
branches/plant<br />
No. <strong>of</strong><br />
pods/plant<br />
Seed yield<br />
(kg/ha)<br />
94.45 9.10 15.85 1367<br />
64.70 7.55 15.05 1285<br />
48.30 6.35 13.40 1069<br />
39.25 5.55 10.55 817.5<br />
S.Em ± 2.20 0.40 0.75 56<br />
CD (0.05) 7.55 1.40 2.65 194<br />
Varieties<br />
CV (%) 9.05 11.91 11.65 10.97<br />
Tirupati-1 63.55 7.44 14.85 1323<br />
Local brown 61.70 7.25 14.10 1159<br />
Local bold<br />
white<br />
(Meghana)<br />
59.72 6.81 12.20 906<br />
S.Em ± 2.25 0.44 0.365 59.8<br />
CD (0.05) NS NS 1.09 179.05<br />
CV (%) 8.6 15 6.6 13.2<br />
Interaction NS NS NS NS<br />
Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts<br />
862 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
References<br />
Prabhamani, P. S. and Potdar, M. P. 2018. Response <strong>of</strong> Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.)<br />
Genotypes to Sowing Windows and Planting Geometry under Northern Transitional<br />
Zone <strong>of</strong> Karnataka. Int. J. Pure App. Biosci. 6(1):820-827.<br />
Rima Taipodia and Nabam, A.T. 2013. Impact <strong>of</strong> time <strong>of</strong> sowing spacing and seed rate on<br />
potential seed production and fodder quality <strong>of</strong> cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp). J.<br />
Agril. Veter. Sci. 4(4): 61-68.<br />
Shiringani, R. P. and Shimeles, H. A. 2011. Yield response and stability among cowpea<br />
genotypes at three planting dates and test environments. Afr. J. Agric. Res. 6 (4): 3259-<br />
3263.<br />
T6-28P-1246<br />
Influence <strong>of</strong> Foliar Application <strong>of</strong> Potassium Nitrate on Yield and<br />
Economics <strong>of</strong> Soybean under Rainfed Conditions <strong>of</strong> Vidarbha<br />
M. M. Ganvir*, A. S. Dhudse, V. V. Gabhane, A.P. Karunakar, P. N. Chirde,<br />
A. R.Tupe, R.S. Patode and A. B. Chorey<br />
All India Coordinated Research Project for Dryland Agriculture,<br />
Dr. Panjabrao Deshmukh Krishi Vidyapeeth, Akola, Maharashtra-444104<br />
*ganvir08@gmail.com<br />
Soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.) is one <strong>of</strong> the key industrial grain legume crops throughout the<br />
world. It is known for its high productivity, pr<strong>of</strong>itability and diverse industrial uses (Das et. al.<br />
2016). In India, the area under soybean cultivation during 2021-22 was 119.98 lakh ha with<br />
production <strong>of</strong> 118.88 lakh MT and productivity <strong>of</strong> 991 kg ha -1 . In Maharashtra the area under<br />
soybean was 46.17 lakh ha with production <strong>of</strong> 54.21 lakh MT and productivity <strong>of</strong> 1174.27 kg<br />
ha -1 . In Vidarbha, the area under cultivation was 17.65 lakh ha with production <strong>of</strong> 22.79 lakh<br />
MT and productivity <strong>of</strong> 1291.5 kg ha -1 (Anonymous, 2022).<br />
In recent years soybean has become a predominant rainy season crop under rainfed<br />
agroecosystem in Vidarbha region. However, the average productivity <strong>of</strong> crop continues to be<br />
very low as compared to world average. Occurrence <strong>of</strong> dry spell at critical growth stages <strong>of</strong><br />
crop is one <strong>of</strong> the major factors responsible for low productivity <strong>of</strong> soybean in Vidarbha region.<br />
In drought stress, there is a reduction in nutrient uptake by the roots partially due to the<br />
reduction in soil moisture. Under such condition, foliar application is a viable option and hence<br />
the present investigation was conducted with an objective to study the effect <strong>of</strong> foliar<br />
application <strong>of</strong> potassium nitrate on yield and economics <strong>of</strong> soybean under rainfed conditions.<br />
863 | Page Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Methodology<br />
The experiment was conducted during kharif season <strong>of</strong> 2017-18 at Farm <strong>of</strong> University<br />
Department <strong>of</strong> Agronomy, Dr. Panjabrao Deshmukh Krishi Vidyapeeth, Akola (Maharashtra).<br />
The soil <strong>of</strong> experimental plot was clayey in texture and slightly alkaline in reaction. As regards<br />
to fertility status, the soil was medium in available nitrogen, low in available phosphorus, fairly<br />
high in available potassium and moderate in organic carbon. The experiment was laid out in a<br />
randomized block design with three replications. The eight treatments comprised <strong>of</strong> T1- Control<br />
(No Spray), T 2-Water spray at 25-30 DAS and 60-65 DAS, T 3 - 1% KNO 3 at 25-30 DAS, T 4-<br />
2% KNO3 at 25-30 DAS, T5- 1% KNO3 at 60-65 DAS, T6- 2% KNO3 at 60-65 DAS, T7-1%<br />
KNO3 at 25-30 DAS and 60-65 DAS and T8- 2% KNO3 at 25-30 DAS and 60-65 DAS.<br />
Results<br />
Data on productivity and economics <strong>of</strong> soybean as influenced by different treatments is<br />
presented in the Table. Significantly higher grain and straw yield (2135 and 2677 kg ha -1 ,<br />
respectively) was recorded with application 1% KNO 3 at 25-30 DAS and 60-65 DAS (T 7) and<br />
found at par with application <strong>of</strong> 2 % KNO3 at 25-30 DAS and 60-65 DAS (T8) which recorded<br />
grain and straw yield <strong>of</strong> 2055 and 2610 kg ha -1 , respectively. The lowest grain yield <strong>of</strong> 1590<br />
kg ha -1 and straw yield <strong>of</strong> 2103 kg ha -1 was observed in T1 (control). The application <strong>of</strong><br />
potassium nitrate supplied N and K which are absorbed as anion and cation by plants and might<br />
have delayed the synthesis <strong>of</strong> abscisic acid and promoted cytokinin activity causing higher<br />
chlorophyll retention which in turn promoted more leaf area.<br />
Productivity and Economics <strong>of</strong> soybean as influenced by different treatments<br />
Treatment<br />
Yield (kg ha -1 )<br />
Seed<br />
Straw<br />
Gross<br />
Monetary<br />
Returns<br />
(Rs. ha -1 )<br />
Net<br />
Monetary<br />
Returns<br />
(kg ha -1 )<br />
B:C ratio<br />
T 1 - Control (No Spray) 1590 2103 59856 31783 2.13<br />
T 2 - Water Spray at 25-30 DAS and 60-<br />
65 DAS<br />
1651 2140 62065 33072 2.14<br />
T 3 - 1% KNO 3 at 25-30 DAS 1852 2391 69602 39712 2.33<br />
T 4 - 2% KNO 3 at 25-30 DAS 1820 2356 68412 37625 2.22<br />
T 5 - 1% KNO 3 at 60-65 DAS 1905 2445 71565 41545 2.38<br />
T 6 - 2% KNO 3 at 60-65 DAS 1880 2422 70644 39727 2.28<br />
T 7 - 1% KNO 3 at 25-30 DAS and 60-65<br />
DAS<br />
T 8 - 2% KNO 3 at 25-30 DAS and 60-65<br />
DAS<br />
2135 2677 80079 48242 2.52<br />
2055 2610 77145 43514 2.29<br />
SE (m)± 47 71 1845 1845 0.06<br />
CD at 5% 145 213 5536 5536 0.19<br />
Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts<br />
864 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
This may secure higher photosynthetic activity in effective leaves and supplied to developing<br />
pods with current photosynthates for proper filling, resulting in higher yield. Vekaria et al.<br />
(2013) and Kumar et al. (2017) also found similar results.<br />
The foliar application <strong>of</strong> 1% KNO3 at 25-30 DAS and 60-65 DAS (T7) recorded significantly<br />
maximum gross monetary returns (Rs. 80079 ha -1 ) and net monetary returns (Rs. 48242 ha -1 )<br />
and was at par with application <strong>of</strong> 2% KNO 3 at 25-30 DAS and 60-65 DAS (T 8) which recorded<br />
gross monetary returns <strong>of</strong> Rs.77115 ha -1 and net monetary returns <strong>of</strong> Rs.43514 ha -1 . The<br />
minimum gross monetary return (Rs.59856 ha -1 ) and net monetary returns (Rs. 31783 ha -1 ) was<br />
observed in T1 (control). This might be due to improvement in growth and yield attributes and<br />
ultimate increase in seed yield which could be the reason for enhanced economic returns in the<br />
above treatments. Maximum B:C ratio <strong>of</strong> 2.52 was recorded with application <strong>of</strong> 1% KNO 3 at<br />
25-30 and 60-65 DAS (T7) followed by treatment <strong>of</strong> 1 % KNO3 at 60-65 DAS (T5). The lowest<br />
B:C ratio <strong>of</strong> 2.13 was observed in T 1 (control). Similar observation was recorded by Kumar<br />
and Srivastava (2015).<br />
Conclusion<br />
Foliar application <strong>of</strong> 1% KNO 3 at 25-30 and 60-65 DAS on soybean was beneficial for getting<br />
the higher productivity, maximum monetary returns and higher B:C ratio.<br />
References<br />
Anonymous 2022. State and District wise statistics <strong>of</strong> crops acreage, production and<br />
productivity in Maharashtra state. (www.mahaagri.gov.in).<br />
Das A, Babu S, Yadav GS, Ansari MA, Singh R, Baishya LK, Rajkhowa DJ and Ngachan SV.<br />
2016. Status and strategies for pulses production for food and nutritional security in<br />
North-Eastern Region <strong>of</strong> India. Indian J. Agron., 61: 43–47.<br />
Kumar M, Suryavanshi VP and Dambal AS. 2017. Growth and yield <strong>of</strong> soybean [Glycine max<br />
(L.) Merrill] as influenced by foliar application <strong>of</strong> micronutrients and potassium nitrate.<br />
Agric. Update, 12(TECHSEAR-1):247-250.<br />
Kumar J. and Srivastava SK. 2015. Growth and yield attributes, yield, fibre quality and<br />
economics <strong>of</strong> hirsutum cotton as influenced by foliar application <strong>of</strong> KNO 3. Plant Arch.,<br />
15(2):1147-1149.<br />
Vekaria GB, Talpada MM, Sutaria GS. and Akbari KN. 2013. Effect <strong>of</strong> foliar nutrition<br />
potassium nitrate on growth and yield on green gram. Legume Res. 36 (2):162-165.<br />
865 | Page Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
T6-29P-1254<br />
Impact <strong>of</strong> Cluster Front Line Demonstrations on Productivity and<br />
Pr<strong>of</strong>itability <strong>of</strong> Mung bean (Vigna radiata L.) var. IPM-02-3 and MH-421 in<br />
Churu district <strong>of</strong> Rajasthan<br />
Hrish Kumar Rachhoya, V.K.Saini and Ramesh Choudhary<br />
Krishi Vigyan Kendra, (GVM), Sardarshahar-331403, District-Churu (Rajasthan), India<br />
kvkchuru@gmail.com<br />
Churu comes under desert region <strong>of</strong> Rajasthan and agriculturally it is very important district.<br />
In Churu Mung bean cultivation is common practice but its productivity is very low. To<br />
establish the production potential <strong>of</strong> this pulse Cluster Front Line Demonstration (CFLD) is an<br />
appropriate tool. To increase the production and productivity <strong>of</strong> Mung bean in the district,<br />
Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Gandhi Vidya Mandir, Sardarshahar, Churu (Rajasthan) conducted 275<br />
demonstrations (110 ha) on Mung bean during 2016 to 2021 in eight adopted villages. The<br />
critical inputs were identified after gap analysis in existing production technology through<br />
meeting and group discussions with the farmers. Average yield data <strong>of</strong> conducted CFLDs<br />
revealed that, higher yield (657 kg ha -1 ) was obtained in demonstration plot over local check<br />
(483 kg ha- 1 ) and an additional yield in demonstration plot was obtained 174 kg. Per cent<br />
increase over local check was found 35.87. Average extension gap, technology gap and<br />
technology index were found 174 kg ha- 1 , 343 kg ha -1 and 34.31 % , respectively. Average <strong>of</strong><br />
gross and net returns <strong>of</strong> demonstration was Rs. 39003 and Rs. 24154 higher than the farmers’<br />
practice. Most important factor B: C ratio indicates that whether CFLD technology is<br />
pr<strong>of</strong>itable, B:C ratio was found higher throughout the study and average was (2.58:1) in<br />
demonstration over local check (1.94:1). Review <strong>of</strong> data on incidence <strong>of</strong> disease in crop<br />
revealed that, percentage <strong>of</strong> damaged plant (9.83) was lower in demonstration as compared to<br />
(17.10) under farmers’ practice. Spraying <strong>of</strong> Dimethoate 30 EC @ 1200 ml/ha at flower and<br />
pod formation stage reduces sucking pest attack, consequently lesser infected pods (2.37) in<br />
demo as compared to farmers practices (12.9). Result suggested economic viability and<br />
agronomic feasibility <strong>of</strong> the CFLD technology for Mung bean cultivation.<br />
Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts<br />
866 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
T6-30P-1269<br />
Effect <strong>of</strong> Time <strong>of</strong> Application and Different Foliar Sprays on Yield and<br />
Economics <strong>of</strong> Cotton<br />
A.B. Chorey*, R. S Mali, M. M. Ganvir, V.V. Gabhane, R. S. Patode and<br />
G. Ravindrachary<br />
AICRP for Dryland Agriculture, Dr. PDKV, Akola, Maharashtra-444104<br />
*chiefscientist1057@gmail.com<br />
Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.), popularly known as ‘White Gold’ is grown mainly for fiber<br />
all over the world. It is the major fiber crop <strong>of</strong> the semi-arid tropics <strong>of</strong> Indian subcontinent that<br />
is predominantly rain dependent. In India, it is grown in an area <strong>of</strong> 13.5 million hectares with<br />
a production <strong>of</strong> 36.5 million bales and productivity <strong>of</strong> 460 kg ha − 1 (COCPC, 2020).<br />
Drought occurring is frequent in rainfed regions <strong>of</strong> Vidarbha in Maharashtra State. Under<br />
drought stress, there is a reduction in nutrient uptake by the roots partially due to the reduction<br />
in soil moisture and also crop growth is suffered when the roots are unable to meet the nutrient<br />
requirement <strong>of</strong> the crop at a critical stage. Hence, under such situation foliar nutrition can be<br />
beneficial. The foliar application <strong>of</strong> Zn increases auxin levels within the plants which in turn<br />
enhances the root growth and consequent improvement <strong>of</strong> drought tolerance in plants. Hence<br />
the investigation was conducted to study the effect <strong>of</strong> foliar nutrition on growth and yield <strong>of</strong><br />
cotton to mitigate the ill effects <strong>of</strong> drought situation with different set <strong>of</strong> treatments in situations<br />
<strong>of</strong> stress and after relieving <strong>of</strong> stress.<br />
Methodology<br />
The field experiment was conducted at research field <strong>of</strong> AICRP for Dryland Agriculture, Dr.<br />
PDKV, Akola (MS) during 2021-2022. Effect <strong>of</strong> time <strong>of</strong> application and different foliar sprays<br />
on yield and economics <strong>of</strong> cotton was studied and analyzed. The experiment was laid out in<br />
factorial randomized block design with three replications. For this study two factors were<br />
considered, in factor A: Time <strong>of</strong> application with treatments T 1:Foliar spray during dry spell<br />
and T2 : Foliar spray after reliving <strong>of</strong> stress/dry spell and for factor B different foliar sprays<br />
are used, S 1 : application <strong>of</strong> urea, @1% , S 2:application <strong>of</strong> urea @2%, S 3: application <strong>of</strong> water<br />
soluble complex fertilizer 19:19:19@0.5%, S 4:application <strong>of</strong> water soluble complex fertilizer<br />
19:19:19@ 0.5% + Zinc sulphate @0.5% , S5 :application <strong>of</strong> Zinc sulphate @0.5%, S6:Water<br />
spray, S 7:application <strong>of</strong> KNO 3@1.5% and S 8:Control (No spray).<br />
867 | Page Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Cotton productivity, economics and RWUE as influence by various treatments<br />
Treatments<br />
Time <strong>of</strong> Application<br />
Seed cotton yield<br />
(kg ha -1 )<br />
Cotton stalk yield<br />
(kg ha -1 )<br />
B:C Ratio<br />
RWUE<br />
(kg ha -1 mm -1 )<br />
T 1 1150 2014 1.82 1.57<br />
T2 1017 1781 1.65 1.39<br />
S.Em. +- 6.30 11.06 - 0.01<br />
C.D. at 5% 18.20 31.92 - 0.02<br />
Sprays<br />
S1 1041 1824 1.69 1.42<br />
S 2 1052 1845 1.70 1.44<br />
S3 1253 2193 1.95 1.71<br />
S4 1262 2208 1.92 1.73<br />
S 5 975 1706 1.58 1.33<br />
S6 888 1553 1.49 1.21<br />
S7 1251 2189 1.96 1.71<br />
S 8 949 1660 1.59 1.30<br />
S.Em.+- 9.45 16.58 - 0.01<br />
C.D. at 5 % 27.29 47.89 - 0.04<br />
Interaction Effects<br />
S.Em.± 50.41 88.44 - 0.07<br />
C.D. at 5% NS NS - NS<br />
Mean 1084 1897 1.74 1.48<br />
Results<br />
The results indicated that, treatment <strong>of</strong> foliar spray during dry spell recorded significantly higher<br />
seed cotton yield, cotton stalk yield, B:C ratio and high rainwater use efficiency than treatment <strong>of</strong><br />
foliar spray after relieving <strong>of</strong> stress. Drought disturbs the mineral-nutrient relations in plants<br />
through their effects on nutrient availability and partitioning <strong>of</strong> transport processes in plants.<br />
Frequent soil drying is likely to induce a decrease in nutrients particularly P due to reduced<br />
diffusion and poor uptake, in addition to restrictions in available water, with strong interactive<br />
effects on plant growth and functioning (Singh et al., 2006). Treatment <strong>of</strong> foliar spray <strong>of</strong> 19:19:19<br />
mix water soluble fertilizer + ZnSO 4 @ 0.5% recorded significantly higher seed cotton yield,<br />
cotton stalk yield, B:C ratio and high rainwater use efficiency than rest <strong>of</strong> the treatments. Cotton<br />
productivity was increased due to application <strong>of</strong> different foliar spray (Asewar et al.2021, Singh<br />
et al. 2015 and Shivamurthy and Biradar 2014). This might be due to foliar applied nutrients<br />
sustain proper leaf nutrition as well as carbon balance and improving photosynthetic capacity.<br />
Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts<br />
868 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
References<br />
Asewar, B. V., Pendke, M. S., Narale, S. H., Gopinath, K. A. and Chary, G. R. 2021. Stress<br />
management in rainfed Bt. cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) through foliar sprays. Indian<br />
J. Agron., 66(3): 117-121.<br />
COCPC 2020). Committee on Cotton Production and Consumption.<br />
//cotcorp.org.in/statistics.aspx.<br />
Singh, K., Rathore, P. and Gumber, R. K. 2015. Effects <strong>of</strong> foliar application <strong>of</strong> nutrients on<br />
growth and yield <strong>of</strong> Bt cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Bangladesh J. Bot., 44(1): 9-<br />
14.<br />
Singh V., Pallaghy C. K. and Singh D. 2006. Phosphorus nutrition and tolerance <strong>of</strong> cotton to<br />
water stress I. Seed cotton yield and leaf morphology. Field Crops Res., 96 (2-3): 191-<br />
198.<br />
Shivamurthy D. and Biradar D. P. 2014. Effect <strong>of</strong> foliar nutrition on growth, yield attributes<br />
and seed cotton yield <strong>of</strong> Bt cotton. Karnataka J. Agric. Sci., 27(1): 5-8.<br />
T6-31P-1274<br />
Production Potential and Economic Feasibility <strong>of</strong> Pigeonpea base<br />
Intercropping System in Scarcity Zone <strong>of</strong> Maharashtra<br />
D. K. Kathmale, R. M. Gethe, S. V. Khadtare and V. M. Amrutsagar<br />
All India Coordinated Research Project for Dryland Agriculture, Main Center, Solapur- 413 002<br />
Maharashtra (India)<br />
zarssolapur@gmail.com<br />
Intercropping is generally practiced on small farms with limited resources and it has been<br />
observed to enhance yields with greater stability in a variety <strong>of</strong> crop combinations. On-farm<br />
biodiversity is also promoted by diversification <strong>of</strong> crops in mixed cropping, intercropping and<br />
agr<strong>of</strong>orestry systems resulting in variation <strong>of</strong> diet and net returns, stability, proper utilization<br />
<strong>of</strong> limited resources human labour-force under low levels <strong>of</strong> technological intervention (Anil<br />
et al, 1998). Pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan) is a multi-purpose grain legume, particularly grown in<br />
the semi-arid tropics. This region has the wide rainfall variability and the rainfall during kharif<br />
season is <strong>of</strong>ten ill distributed. It has capacity to adjust to the poor agro-ecological conditions<br />
prevalent in this region. India is a principal pigeon pea growing country accounting for<br />
approximately 90% <strong>of</strong> the total world production. In India, it is the second most cultivatable<br />
pulse crop after chickpea which is cultivated on about 3.62 million ha (Sarkar et al, 2020).<br />
Pigeon pea is suitable for intercropping with different crops like soybean, green gram,<br />
black gram and cowpea for increasing production, proper land utilization and<br />
869 | Page Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
maintaining soil fertility. The initial slow growth rate and deep root system <strong>of</strong> pigeon<br />
pea <strong>of</strong>fers a good scope for intercropping with fast growing early maturing and shallow<br />
rooted crops. Considering these points an experiment was conducted to evaluate<br />
comparative performance <strong>of</strong> the pigeon pea based intercropping system.<br />
Methodology<br />
The field evaluation <strong>of</strong> pigeonpea base intercropping systems was carried out on at the Dry<br />
Farming Research Station, Solapur (MS) with an objective to study the production potential<br />
and economics <strong>of</strong> pigeonpea based inter cropping systems under rainfed condition. The<br />
experiment was conducted for three consecutive years during kharif seasons <strong>of</strong> 2015-16 to<br />
2017-18. The experimental soil was low in available N (138 kg/ha), medium in available P2O5<br />
(10.23 kg/ ha) and higher in available K 2O (454 kg/ha). The organic carbon content was low<br />
(0.38%) with pH (7.84) and electrical conductivity <strong>of</strong> 0.17dS/m. The experiment was laid out<br />
in randomized block design with three replications. In all, 9 treatments comprising five sole<br />
crops viz. pigeonpea, clusterbean, soybean, pearl millet, sunflower and four intercropping<br />
systems viz. pigeonpea + clusterbean (1:5), pigeonpea + soybean (1:5), pigeonpea<br />
+pearlmillet(1:3) and pigeonpea+ sunflower(1:3). The crops were given the recommended<br />
fertilizer dose and raised with recommended agronomic practices <strong>of</strong> MPKV Rahuri.<br />
Results<br />
The result revealed that, the yield <strong>of</strong> different crops in intercrops was influenced significantly<br />
by different treatments (Table). Higher yield under sole crops was recorded under sole soybean.<br />
While pigeonpea grain yield in association with different intercropping ranged between 610 to<br />
741 kg/ha and 1146 to 1347 kg/ha grain and straw yield, respectively. The pigeonpea grain<br />
equivalent yield (1637 kg/ha) was significantly higher in pigeonpea + sunflower 1:2<br />
intercropping system. While, pigeonpea + soybean (1:5) was second in order. Among the sole<br />
crops highest yield <strong>of</strong> 1862 kg/ha was recorded in sunflower. The highest LER (1.57) was<br />
observed in pigeonpea + sunflower (1:3) intercropping system followed by pigeon pea +<br />
soybean (1:5) was observed in intercropping system. Economic analysis revealed that the<br />
intercropping in pigeonpea + sunflower (1:3) recorded maximum gross monetary returns<br />
Rs.73,674/ha and Net Monetary returns Rs.30,872/ha and B:C ratio (1.72) followed by sole<br />
sunflower with gross monetary returns Rs.53706/ha and net monetary returns Rs.21141/ha and<br />
B:C ratio (1.65).<br />
Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts<br />
870 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Sr.<br />
No.<br />
Yield <strong>of</strong> Main crop, Pigeonpea equivalent yield and LER as influence by various<br />
intercropping treatment under rainfed condition<br />
Treatment<br />
Main crop<br />
yield kg/ha<br />
Intercrop<br />
yield kg/ha<br />
Grain Straw Grain Straw<br />
Pigeonpea<br />
equivalent<br />
yield<br />
kg/ha<br />
LER<br />
NMR<br />
(Rs/ha)<br />
T 1 Sole pigeon pea 884 1391 0 0 8862 1.26 946 1<br />
T 2<br />
Sole clusterbean<br />
gum<br />
547 846 0 0 10204 1.40 791 1<br />
T 3 Sole soybean 1235 1492 0 0 22829 1.60 1356 1<br />
T 4 Sole pearl millet 1131 3633 0 0 6986 1.31 664 1<br />
T 5 Sole sunflower 1055 1533 0 0 21141 1.65 1193 1<br />
T 6<br />
T 7<br />
T 8<br />
T 9<br />
References<br />
Pigeon pea +<br />
cluster bean<br />
Pigeon pea +<br />
soybean<br />
Pigeon pea + pearl<br />
millet<br />
Pigeon pea +<br />
sunflower<br />
B:C<br />
ratio<br />
632 1278 231 392 2818 1.07 1007 1.14<br />
741 1347 747 906 27248 1.62 1581 1.44<br />
610 1146 812 1036 7382 1.19 1022 1.41<br />
662 1206 864 963 30874 1.72 1637 1.57<br />
SE+/- 46<br />
Cd (P=0.05) 141<br />
CV (%) 14.9<br />
Anil, L., Park, J., Phipps, R.H., Miller, F.A. 1998. Temperate intercropping <strong>of</strong> cereals<br />
for forage: A review <strong>of</strong> the potential for growth and utilization with particular<br />
reference to the UK. Grass and Forage Sci. 53: 301-317. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-<br />
2494.1998.00144<br />
Sarkar,S., Panda,S., Yadav, K.K., and Kandasamy., 2020 Pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan) an<br />
important food legume in Indian scenario– A review. Legume Res. 43, 601-610<br />
871 | Page Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
T6-32P-1306<br />
Decomposition <strong>of</strong> Agricultural Growth by Sources in Andhra Pradesh<br />
G. Samba Siva, C. A. Rama Rao, B. M. K. Raju and N. Swapna<br />
ICAR-Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, Hyderabad 500059<br />
The growth <strong>of</strong> agricultural sector and the sources <strong>of</strong> growth in the crop sector in Andhra<br />
Pradesh are identified by following growth accounting approach. Increase in real prices and<br />
technological change accounted for bulk <strong>of</strong> the output growth in the crop sector where as<br />
diversification and area expansion accounted for smaller fraction <strong>of</strong> the growth in Andhra<br />
Pradesh. The analysis was done for the period 2005-06 to 2016-17 for the data obtained from<br />
the Department <strong>of</strong> Agriculture, Cooperation and Farmers’ Welfare, Government <strong>of</strong> India and<br />
from the publications or web sites <strong>of</strong> the states <strong>of</strong> Andhra Pradesh. For decomposing the output<br />
growth, data on area, yield and farm harvest prices were considered for 15 crops in Andhra<br />
Pradesh accounting for more than 75 per cent <strong>of</strong> gross cropped area. The farm harvest prices<br />
were adjusted for inflation using the GDP deflator.<br />
Sources <strong>of</strong> growth within crop production sector were identified by the method as given in<br />
Joshi et al. (2006). The change in revenue from the crop production sector was decomposed in<br />
the form <strong>of</strong> following equation:<br />
<br />
∂R ≅ a Y P ∂ A + A (a P ∂Y ) + A (a Y ∂P ) + A (P Y ∂a )<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Where A, Y, P and Rare total area, yield, price and revenue and the subscript i denotes the crop<br />
and a i = A i/A i. This equation presents the total change in the revenue from crop sector as a<br />
total <strong>of</strong> (i) change in the total cropped area, (ii) change in real prices <strong>of</strong> the crop commodities,<br />
(iii) change in the crop yields or technological change, (iv) changes in the cropping pattern or<br />
diversification. A small fraction <strong>of</strong> the total change arising out <strong>of</strong> the interaction among the<br />
four factors is not captured.<br />
Decomposition <strong>of</strong> growth by source<br />
The results <strong>of</strong> analysis <strong>of</strong> sources <strong>of</strong> growth show that the growth in crop sector was largely<br />
driven by the change in real prices. The change in real farm harvest prices <strong>of</strong> the crops accounted<br />
for 61.1 per cent change in the total crop revenue in Andhra Pradesh. Yield or Technological<br />
change as reflected in the yield growth also contributed to 34.1 per cent to the total change.<br />
Changes in cropping pattern or diversification accounted for a mere 3 per cent change in Andhra<br />
Pradesh. The contribution <strong>of</strong> area expansion was found to be negative (3.4 %) indicating the<br />
competition for limited land resources and a small fraction <strong>of</strong> total change arising out <strong>of</strong> the<br />
interaction effect (5.1%).<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts<br />
872 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
It can be observed that the total cropped area in Andhra Pradesh saw a drop <strong>of</strong> 1.9 per cent<br />
during the period 2004-05 to 2016-17 (Table 1). The area under cotton (113.8%), maize<br />
(33.2%), dry chillies (25.3%), pigeon pea (14.6%) and Chick pea (7.7%) increased noticeably,<br />
whereas the area under mesta (88.5%), turmeric (69.5%), castor seed (66.4%), sorghum<br />
(51.8%), finger millet (48.2%), sesame (40.8%), pearl millet (40.3%), groundnut (38.4%),<br />
tobacco (14.5%), rice (0.9%) and other crops (15.2%) decreased during the period 2004-05 to<br />
2016-17 in the state <strong>of</strong> Andhra Pradesh.<br />
Change in area and yield under major crops between 2004-05 and 2016-17<br />
S. No Crop Area (000 ha) Yield (Q/ha)<br />
1 Rice -31.9 (-0.9) 4.62 (15.3)<br />
2 Maize 237.2 (33.2) 6.33 (17.9)<br />
3 Pearl millet -31.7 (-40.3) 5.74 (64.9)<br />
4 Sorghum -236.1 (-51.8) 6.23 (56.2)<br />
5 Finger millet -31.1 (-48.2) -1.28 (-10.7)<br />
6 Chick pea 34.3 (7.7) -1.55 (-12.6)<br />
7 Pigeonpea 67.1 (14.6) 0.25 (5.1)<br />
8 Groundnut -646.5 (-38.4) 1.69 (23.3)<br />
9 Sesame -59.8 (-40.8) 0.95 (41.9)<br />
10 Castor Seed -181.1 (-66.4) 1.19 (29.2)<br />
11 Cotton 1206.9 (113.8) 0.76 (21.9)<br />
12 Mesta -48.8 (-88.5) -0.98 (-6.2)<br />
13 Turmeric -45.4 (-69.5) -4.39 (-6.4)<br />
14 Tobacco -18.8 (-14.5) 9.92 (70.8)<br />
15 Dry Chilies 52.5 (25.3) 9.95 (30.2)<br />
16 Other crops -513.3 (-15.2) -<br />
Total -246.4 (-1.9) -<br />
Source: Authors’ estimate using data from Directorate <strong>of</strong> Economics and Statistics (DES) and Figures in the<br />
Parenthesis indicates percentage<br />
Yield growth is one <strong>of</strong> the important driver <strong>of</strong> crop revenue growth and is a function <strong>of</strong> adoption<br />
<strong>of</strong> high yielding crop varieties, agricultural mechanization, increased use <strong>of</strong> yield enhancing<br />
inputs such as fertilizer nutrients, etc. (Singh and Pal, 2010). In Andhra Pradesh, yield <strong>of</strong><br />
tobacco, pearl millet and sorghum increased by more than 50 per cent between 2004 and 2016.<br />
Other crops also witnessed considerable yield growth during this period (Table 1).<br />
Conclusion<br />
Andhra Pradesh did better in terms <strong>of</strong> contribution <strong>of</strong> price, technology and diversification<br />
effects. The contribution <strong>of</strong> area expansion was either marginal or negative showing the limited<br />
scope for considering an extensive agriculture as a source <strong>of</strong> further growth in agriculture.<br />
873 | Page Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Thus, there is a need for promoting diversification by investing in processing, marketing and<br />
institutional infrastructure in Andhra Pradesh. Considering the diversity <strong>of</strong> agricultural setting,<br />
only a regionally differentiated approach to research, extension and infrastructure development<br />
seems appropriate.<br />
References<br />
Directorate <strong>of</strong> Economics and Statistics. (2019). State Domestic Product and other aggregates, 2011-<br />
2012 series. Ministry <strong>of</strong> Statistics and Programme Implementation, New Delhi.<br />
Joshi, P. K., Birthal, P. S., & Minot, N. (2006). Sources <strong>of</strong> Agricultural Growth in India: Role <strong>of</strong><br />
Diversification toward High-Value Crops. MTID Discussion Paper 85, International Food<br />
Policy Research Institute, Washington, DC.<br />
Singh, A., & Pal, S. (2010). The Changing Pattern and Sources <strong>of</strong> Agricultural Growth in India. In: The<br />
Shifting Patterns <strong>of</strong> Agricultural Production and Productivity Worldwide (Alston, J. M.,<br />
Babcock, B. A., & Pardey, P. G, eds.). Midwest Agribusiness Trade Research and Information<br />
Center, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa.<br />
Diversification in Agriculture Boon for Farmers.<br />
T6-33P-1312<br />
U.N. Umesh, Kumari Vibha Rani*, Sanjeev Ranjan, Jyoti Sinha, Brajendu Kumar and<br />
Amrendra Kumar<br />
Krishi Vigyan Kendra,Nalanda<br />
*kumarivibhaa1@gmail.com<br />
Erratic rainfall is a major problem for farming community. In 2021 there was heavy rainfall in<br />
September -October. It leads to heavy loss <strong>of</strong> paddy crop during 2021 and late sowing <strong>of</strong> rabi<br />
crop. In most part <strong>of</strong> area <strong>of</strong> Nalanda district major soil type is clay loam. It retains moisture<br />
for longer duration and also leads to late sowing <strong>of</strong> rabi crops. In changing climatic condition<br />
there is sudden rise in temperature during last week <strong>of</strong> February and heat wave started from<br />
15-20 March and leads to premature drying <strong>of</strong> all rabi crops during 2022 and lead to heavy<br />
reduction in yield. To overcome these adverse situations, we selected village Sherpur under<br />
NICRA project <strong>of</strong> Nalanda District. In this village land situation is low, medium and upland.<br />
In low land area there is water logged situation for few months(flood) and some upland area<br />
comes under moisture stress also. According to land situation and climatic condition there are<br />
four types <strong>of</strong> typologies as moisture stress with animal, irrigated with animal, irrigated without<br />
animal and flooded with animal. We are conducting several interventions such as different<br />
varieties <strong>of</strong> paddy, green gram, okra (Variety Kashi Lalima), Mushroom cultivation, backyard<br />
poultry, fisheries, and papaya cultivation on the bund <strong>of</strong> ponds under NICRA project since<br />
January 2022. It lead to increase in the income <strong>of</strong> the farmers and they are using different new<br />
technologies i.e. ZT, brush cutter, bund maker, power weeders etc. We are introducing Zero<br />
Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts<br />
874 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
till technology for time saving and reducing the cost <strong>of</strong> cultivation and maximum utilization <strong>of</strong><br />
resources.<br />
T6-34P-1320<br />
Capacity Needs Assessment for Integrating Nutrition Objectives into<br />
Extension Advisory Service (EAS) Programs<br />
Veenita Kumari and Shirisha Junuthula<br />
National Institute <strong>of</strong> Agricultural Extension Management (MANAGE), Telangana-500030, India<br />
Even after several decades <strong>of</strong> green revolution, malnutrition continues to be a major<br />
development challenge in most <strong>of</strong> the South Asian countries, and India has a major share <strong>of</strong> the<br />
malnourished population in the region (Gomez et al. 2013). The nutritional issues in India are<br />
complex and therefore require a multi-faceted, multi-disciplinary solution. One facet <strong>of</strong> the<br />
solution is enriching knowledge about the causes <strong>of</strong> and solutions to malnutrition at the farm<br />
and household level, through agricultural extension (Lal, 2020). Disseminating nutritionsensitive<br />
agricultural knowledge is not currently an activity <strong>of</strong> agricultural extension in India<br />
(Kadiyala et al. 2018), but there is a great potential for integrating it through the wellestablished<br />
network <strong>of</strong> extension <strong>of</strong>ficers.<br />
The objectives <strong>of</strong> the study are: -<br />
To assess the nutrition and NAS related knowledge, skill, and attitude <strong>of</strong> the EAS<br />
<strong>of</strong>ficers in Agriculture & Allied sectors working at various levels<br />
To identify the learning needs and training priorities among the EAS staff in relation to<br />
NSA<br />
Methodology<br />
An online survey was conducted to assess the learning needs <strong>of</strong> the <strong>of</strong>ficers working at ‘Field<br />
Level Staff (FLS)’ and ‘Mid-Senior Level Staff (MLS)’, to understand their capacities and their<br />
learning needs. The study was conducted with respondents selected across India. These<br />
respondents were the participants who had attended a training program in the past two years<br />
(2018-19) at MANAGE. Due to the ongoing pandemic situation <strong>of</strong> COVID-19, the survey was<br />
conducted via online mode using Google forms sent to the respondents through email. A total<br />
<strong>of</strong> 168 responses were received among which, 100 at Mid-senior level and 68 at field level.<br />
Results<br />
The surveyed EAS staff were in the productive age group (30 to above 60 years) so, by<br />
providing the NSA trainings their potential can be enhanced to contribute towards agriculture<br />
and nutrition fields. However, gender wise participation data showed that female participation<br />
875 | Page Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
was low when compared to that <strong>of</strong> male participation which needs immediate attention by the<br />
Government and policy makers.<br />
In terms <strong>of</strong> nutritional awareness among FLS and MLS staff, they have good awareness<br />
regarding the contributors <strong>of</strong> good health and impacts <strong>of</strong> poor nutrition. This awareness<br />
will be helpful in guiding the farming community towards tackling malnutrition.<br />
Majority <strong>of</strong> the respondents reported that they had noticed under nutrition and over<br />
nutrition cases, which is clear evidence that India is facing the double burden <strong>of</strong><br />
nutrition. By making use <strong>of</strong> the EAS staff at farming community, nutritional problems<br />
can be addressed to some extent.<br />
The dietary needs <strong>of</strong> an individual depend upon factors such as age, gender, education,<br />
health status and physiological conditions. The analyzed data from the survey showed<br />
that MSL group have more awareness than the FLS group. This is because they had<br />
already attended many training programs in relation to nutrition.<br />
Training on Nutrition related areas adequate to build capacity in tackling nutritional problems<br />
The top 5 areas felt important by FLS respondents in the order <strong>of</strong> importance were: 1.<br />
Nutrition education, 2. Locally available nutritious crops, varieties and species, 3.<br />
Promoting the role <strong>of</strong> women farmers in production/marketing/value addition in ways<br />
that would not increase their work burden, 4. Promotion <strong>of</strong> diversification <strong>of</strong> crops and<br />
5. Promotion <strong>of</strong> kitchen gardens. The MSL group ranked NSA topics in the order <strong>of</strong>: 1.<br />
Promotion <strong>of</strong> kitchen gardens, 2. Promotion <strong>of</strong> diversification <strong>of</strong> crops, 3. Locally<br />
available nutritious crops, varieties and species, 4. Nutrition education and 4. Promoting<br />
the role <strong>of</strong> women farmers in production/ marketing/ value addition in ways that would<br />
not increase their work burden and 5. Promotion <strong>of</strong> value addition <strong>of</strong> crops/ horticultural<br />
nutrient crops.<br />
Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts<br />
876 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Conclusion<br />
The reasons for this were lack <strong>of</strong> NSA mandate, lack <strong>of</strong> induction program with nutrition topic,<br />
lack <strong>of</strong> resources, manpower, knowledge and awareness, lack <strong>of</strong> commitment, responsibility,<br />
lack <strong>of</strong> collaborations with other institutions, low availability or use ICE/ICT material and<br />
administrational problems. Immediate action is needed to train the EAS staff on nutritional<br />
concepts to achieve the Sustainable developmental goals (SDGs).<br />
References<br />
Gomez, M. I., Barrett, C. B., Raney, T., Pinstrup-Andersen, P., Meerman, J., Croppenstedt, A.,<br />
Carisma, B and Thompson, B. 2013. Post-green revolution food systems and the triple<br />
burden <strong>of</strong> malnutrition. Food Policy, 42, 129-138.<br />
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2013.06.009.<br />
Kadiyala, S., Prost, A., Harris-Fry, H., O Hearn, M., Pradhan, R., Pradhan, S and Allen, E.<br />
2018. Upscaling Participatory Action and Videos for Agriculture and Nutrition<br />
(UPAVAN) trial comparing three variants <strong>of</strong> a nutrition-sensitive agricultural<br />
extension intervention to improve maternal and child nutritional outcomes in rural<br />
Odisha, India: study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial. Trials, 19(1),<br />
1-16.<br />
Lal, R. 2020. Home gardening and urban agriculture for advancing food and nutritional security<br />
in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Food security, 12(4), 871-876.<br />
Studies on Productivity and Economics <strong>of</strong> Different Maize based<br />
Intercropping Systems under Rainfed Conditions <strong>of</strong> Jammu<br />
T6-35P-1326<br />
A.P. Singh 1* , G. Ravindra Chary 2 , A. Gopinath 2 , Jai Kumar 3 , Brinder Singh 1 ,<br />
Rohit Shrama 1 and Sunny Raina 1<br />
1 All India Coordinated Project for Dryland agriculture, Rakh-Dhiansar, Samba (UT <strong>of</strong> J & K),<br />
2 ICAR-Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, Hyderabad, Telangana,<br />
3 Sher-e-Kashmir University <strong>of</strong> Agricultural Sciences and Technology <strong>of</strong> Jammu, Rakh Dhiansar,<br />
Jammu, Jammu and Kashmir (UT) 181 133<br />
*apsinghagron@gmail.com<br />
Maize is the third most grain crop in India after rice and wheat. Intercropping in maize with<br />
short duration legumes, oilseeds and others has potential to obtain high productivity and<br />
pr<strong>of</strong>itability at low water use without reducing its own yield (Sharma et al., 2013) Intercropping<br />
provides insurance against crop failure or unstable market prices. Inclusion <strong>of</strong> legumes in a<br />
system as intercrop, not only supplement nitrogen to the base crop but also increases the amount<br />
877 | Page Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
<strong>of</strong> humus in the soil due to decaying crop remains (Shyamal Kheroar et al., 2013). Maizelegume<br />
intercropping system besides increasing productivity and pr<strong>of</strong>itability <strong>of</strong> the crops also<br />
improves soil health, conserves soil moisture and increases total turnout (Ummed et al., 2008).<br />
Plant population in an intercropping system affects the balance <strong>of</strong> competition crop and overall<br />
productivity. Wide inter-row space in maize during the initial growth period provides ample<br />
scope to cultivate the intercrops to increase the crop productivity and economic returns per unit<br />
area and time. Hence, in peasant subsistence agriculture adoption <strong>of</strong> appropriate cropping<br />
systems enables the farmers to use natural resources efficiently<br />
Methodology<br />
A field experiment was carried out at research farm <strong>of</strong> Advanced Centre for Dryland<br />
Agriculture, Sher-e-Kashmir University <strong>of</strong> Agricultural Sciences and Technology <strong>of</strong> Jammu at<br />
Rakh Dhiansar during Kharif, 2020. Experiment comprises <strong>of</strong> nine treatments viz: - Maize,<br />
Cowpea, Green gram, Marrigold, Blackgram, Maize + Cowpea (1:1), Maize + Greengram<br />
(1:1), Maize + Marrigold (1:1), Maize + Blackgram (1:1) were tested in randomized block<br />
design under sandy loam soil having slightly acidic in nature, well drained low in carbon,<br />
(0.22), low in available nitrogen (162 kg ha -1 ) and potassium (102 kg ha -1 ) and medimum in<br />
available phosphorous (14.4 kg ha -1 ). Maize, Cowpea, Black gram, Green gram and Marigold<br />
were sown under different cropping sequences as per technical programme given during Kharif<br />
2020 and the recommended package and practices were followed as per the crop sown.<br />
Results<br />
Evaluation <strong>of</strong> different maize-based intercropping systems during kharif under rainfed conditions.<br />
Treatment<br />
Yield<br />
(q ha -1 ) MEY<br />
Main Intercrop<br />
(q ha -1 )<br />
crop<br />
LER<br />
COC<br />
(Rs<br />
ha -1 )<br />
Net<br />
Retuns<br />
(Rs. ha -1 )<br />
B:C<br />
Ratio<br />
RWUE<br />
(kg ha -1<br />
mm -1 )<br />
T1 Maize 23.50 - 23.50 - 23700 29434 2.24 4.82<br />
T2 Cowpea 11.30 - 39.38 - 15750 57700 4.66 8.08<br />
T3 Greengram 5.60 - 24.02 - 18000 26797 2.49 4.93<br />
T4 Marrigold 20.00 - 21.45 - 35000 85000 3.43 4.40<br />
T5 Blackgram 4.75 - 17.83 - 17500 15753 1.90 3.66<br />
T6<br />
T7<br />
T8<br />
Maize +<br />
Cowpea (1:1)<br />
Maize +<br />
Greengram<br />
(1:1)<br />
Maize +<br />
Marrigold<br />
(1:1)<br />
20.60 3.70 34.49 1.20 27000 45353 2.68 7.07<br />
19.00 1.70 26.29 1.11 28500 27831 1.98 5.39<br />
19.50 5.00 24.86 1.08 29500 24356 1.83 5.10<br />
Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts<br />
878 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
T9<br />
Maize +<br />
Blackgram<br />
(1:1)<br />
18.75 1.55 24.57 1.12 27500 25444 1.93 5.04<br />
CD (5%) - - 3.85.0 - - - - -<br />
Among the different intercropping systems highest maize equivalent yield (MEY) <strong>of</strong> 3449 kg<br />
ha -1 was obtained in maize + cowpea (1:1) with the corresponding highest values <strong>of</strong> net returns,<br />
LER, B:C ratio and RWUE <strong>of</strong> Rs. 45353 ha -1 , 1.20, 2.68 and 7.07 kg ha -1 -mm, respectively<br />
over Maize + greengram (1:1) with the corresponding values <strong>of</strong> net returns, LER, B:C ratio and<br />
RWUE <strong>of</strong> Rs. 27831 ha -1 , 1.11, 1.98 and 5.39 kg ha -1 -mm, respectively. Maize+marigold (1:1)<br />
with the corresponding values <strong>of</strong> net returns, LER, B:C ratio and RWUE <strong>of</strong> Rs. 2468 kg ha -1 -<br />
mm, 1.08, 1.83 and 5.10 kg ha -1 -mm, respectively. Similar higher net returns and B:C ration<br />
was obtained by Marer et al., 2007 followed by While the lowest MEY <strong>of</strong> 2457 kg ha -1 was<br />
registered in maize + blackgram (1:1) treatment with RWUE <strong>of</strong> 5.04 kg ha -1 -mm owever,<br />
among the sole systems, sole cowpea registered highest maize equivalent yield to the tune <strong>of</strong><br />
3938 kg ha -1 while the lowest MEY <strong>of</strong> 1783 kg ha -1 was obtained in sole blackgram. Similar<br />
findings were observed by Parimala devi et al., 2019 under maize-based intercropping.<br />
Conclusion<br />
In can be safely concluded that highest maize equivalent yield can be realized by adopting the<br />
Maize + cowpea (1:1) intercropping system instead <strong>of</strong> growing the sole maize, which not only<br />
improved the crop productivity and economic returns per unit area and time while it also<br />
provide the ways to avert total crop failures in rainfed farming situations in the face <strong>of</strong> weather<br />
aberrations particularly during Kharif season<br />
References<br />
Parimaladevi C, Ramanathan SP, Senthil Kumar N, Suresh S. 2019. Evaluation <strong>of</strong> maize based<br />
intercropping systems in Thamirabarani basins <strong>of</strong> Tamil Nadu. J. Pharmacognosy<br />
Phytochem., (8): 4051-4056.<br />
Sharma A, Maruthi Sankar S, Arora S, Guptav, Singh B, Kumar J, Mishra P K. 2013. Analyzing<br />
effects for sustainable rainfed maize productivity in foothills <strong>of</strong> Northwest Himalayas.<br />
Field Crop Res., 145: 96-105.<br />
Shyamal Kheroar and Bikas Chandra Patra. 2013. Advances <strong>of</strong> maize legume Intercropping<br />
systems. J. Agric. Sci. Techn., 733-744.<br />
Umeed S, Saad A A and Singh S R. 2008. Production potential, biological feasibility and<br />
economic viability <strong>of</strong> maize (Zea mays)- based intercropping systems under rainfed<br />
conditions. Indian J. Agric. Sci., 78(12) 1023-1027.<br />
879 | Page Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Integration <strong>of</strong> Millet Crops in Rice Fallow Ecology for System<br />
Intensification<br />
U. Triveni, Y. S. Rani, N. Anuradha and T.S.S.K. Patro<br />
T6-36P-1376<br />
Acharya N.G.Ranga Agricultural University, Agricultural Research Station, Vizianagaram, Andhra<br />
Pradesh 535 001<br />
Increase in food grain production is essential for feeding the current global population.<br />
However, increase in crop area is not possible due to various issues like environmental<br />
concerns, urbanization, industrialization, salinization, etc. Hence crop intensification in the<br />
existing land area is the only option to increase the food grain production in India. Rice fallow<br />
lands are low land rainfed rice growing areas which remain fallow during winter season. These<br />
lands have enormous scope for crop intensification by integrating pulses and oil seeds. In India,<br />
11.7 M.ha <strong>of</strong> rice fallow land is available across various states (Ali et al., 2014). Chhattisgarh<br />
has 35% (4.1 Mha) <strong>of</strong> rice fallow land Odisha and Madhya Pradesh together have 15% (1.8 M<br />
ha). Southern states like Andhra Pradesh, Karnataka and Telangana together have 7.38 M ha<br />
rice fallow land (Gumma et al., 2016). Millets have a greater scope for crop intensification<br />
because <strong>of</strong> their shorter duration, low moisture requirement, biotic and abiotic stress tolerance.<br />
Moreover, Southern and Central India contributed to most millet area and production in the<br />
country. Hence, introduction <strong>of</strong> short duration millet crops in the existing rice fallow lands<br />
would greatly contribute not only to increased millet grain production but also to increased<br />
nutritional security.<br />
Methodology<br />
An experiment was conducted during rabi, 2021-22 at Agricultural Research Station,<br />
Vizianagaram with an aim to test the feasibility <strong>of</strong> eight different millet crops for growing<br />
under rice fallow lands. The millet crops (sorghum, pearl millet, finger millet, foxtail millet,<br />
barnyard millet, brown top millet, kodo millet and little millet) were tested in randomized block<br />
design with three replications. NPK nutrients were applied as per crop recommendations. A<br />
spacing <strong>of</strong> 22.5cm × 10cm was adopted for all the crops except for pearl millet and sorghum,<br />
where 45cm × 10cm was used. Observations on growth and yield attributes and grain yield<br />
were collected at the time <strong>of</strong> maturity and data analysis was done by using ANOVA.<br />
Results<br />
Experiment was conducted to evaluate the performance <strong>of</strong> different millet crops under ricefallows<br />
revealed that all the millet crops adopted very well in rice fallow lands. However, the<br />
sorghum grain yield was higher. This was followed by millet yields (Fig). Among other millets,<br />
the grain yield <strong>of</strong> finger millet, pearl millet, foxtail millet and kodo millet were also higher. Per<br />
Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts<br />
880 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
day productivity was highest with sorghum, but it was closely followed by pearl millet, finger<br />
millet and foxtail millet. Per day productivity <strong>of</strong> barnyard millet was higher than kodo millet<br />
due to its shorter duration. Little millet crop recorded lowest grain yield and per day<br />
productivity. Hence, little millet crop was not pr<strong>of</strong>itable to be grown under rice fallows.<br />
Because <strong>of</strong> the shorter duration and higher per day productivity, pearl millet and foxtail millet<br />
were found best with limited supplemental irrigation. With sufficient supplemental irrigation,<br />
sorghum, finger millet and kodo millet resulted in good economic yields.<br />
Grain yield (kg/ha)<br />
Per day productivity (Kg/ha/day)<br />
Grain yield (kg/ha)<br />
4000<br />
3500<br />
3000<br />
2500<br />
2000<br />
1500<br />
1000<br />
500<br />
0<br />
35.0<br />
30.0<br />
25.0<br />
20.0<br />
15.0<br />
10.0<br />
5.0<br />
0.0<br />
Per day productivity (kg/ha/day)<br />
Grain yield and per day productivity <strong>of</strong> different millet crops under rice fallow condition<br />
Nutritive values <strong>of</strong> millet fodder were far superior as compared to paddy straw (Chaudhry,<br />
1998). Hence, millet fodder would be the ideal source <strong>of</strong> cattle feed. Among different millet<br />
crops tested under rice fallow situation, highest fodder yield was recorded with sorghum and it<br />
was closely followed by the fodder yields <strong>of</strong> finger millet and kodo millet. The longer growing<br />
period <strong>of</strong> these crops might be the reason for higher biomass accumulation as compared to the<br />
other millet crops.<br />
Conclusion<br />
From this study it was concluded that sorghum and finger millet recorded higher yields under<br />
rice fallow lands provided with sufficient supplemental irrigation. Pearl millet and foxtail millet<br />
will be best suitable under limited supplemental irrigation due to shorter duration coupled with<br />
high productivity.<br />
References<br />
Ali, M., Ghosh, P.K., Hazra, K.K. 2014. Resource conservation technologies in rice fallow. In:<br />
Ghosh et al (eds) Resource conservation technology in pulses. Scientific, Jodhpur, pp<br />
83–89.<br />
881 | Page Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Gumma, M.K., Thenkabail, P.S., Teluguntla,P., Rao, M.N., Mohammed, I.A and Whitbread,<br />
A.M. 2016. Mapping rice fallow cropland areas for short-season grain legumes<br />
intensification in South Asia using MODIS 250 m time-series data. Int. J <strong>of</strong> Digit.<br />
Earth, 9,10, 981-1003, DOI: 10.1080/17538947.2016.1168489<br />
Chaudhry, A.R. 1998. Fodders crops in crop production by Shafi Nazir and Elena Bashir<br />
Published by National <strong>Book</strong> Foundation Islamabad 3rd Reprint 1998. 1994; pp. 404-<br />
407.<br />
T6-37P-1386<br />
Impact <strong>of</strong> Millet Consumption Pattern on Lifestyle Diseases <strong>of</strong> the Tribal<br />
and Urban Population, Telangana<br />
Shirisha Junuthula* and V. Vijaya Lakshmi<br />
Pr<strong>of</strong>essor Jayashankar Telangana State Agriculture University (PJTSAU), Telangana-500030, India<br />
*siriinscience@gmail.com<br />
Millets grow well in arid and semi-arid environments, requiring less water than any other grain.<br />
While developing countries in Asia still produce most <strong>of</strong> the world's millets. There is an<br />
increasing recognition <strong>of</strong> their favorable nutrient composition and benefits as healthy food<br />
(Jukanti et al., 2016). Thus, apart from their continued strategic role as staple for the poor in<br />
marginal agricultural regions, they are also assuming a new role as a healthy food replacement<br />
for the urban high-income population (Shirisha et al.,2019). Millet is more than just an<br />
interesting alternative to the more common grains. The grain is also rich in phytochemicals,<br />
including phytic acid, which is believed to lower cholesterol, and phytate, which is associated<br />
with reduced cancer risk (Coulibaly et al., 2011). These health benefits have been partly<br />
attributed to a wide variety <strong>of</strong> potential chemo preventive substances, called phytochemicals,<br />
including antioxidants present in high amounts in millets (Izadi et al., 2012), lower incidences<br />
<strong>of</strong> diabetes have been reported in millet-consuming population. Millets also contain phenolic<br />
inhibitors like alpha-glucosidase, pancreatic amylase reduce postprandial hyperglycemia by<br />
partially inhibiting the enzymatic hydrolysis <strong>of</strong> complex carbohydrates (Shobana et al., 2009).<br />
The objectives <strong>of</strong> the study are:-<br />
To study the millet consumption pattern <strong>of</strong> the selected tribal and urban population.<br />
To study the incidence <strong>of</strong> metabolic disorders among selected tribal and urban<br />
Population.<br />
Methodology<br />
The present study focused on millet consumption pattern <strong>of</strong> the tribal and urban population <strong>of</strong><br />
Telangana state. The survey part was carried out in the five <strong>of</strong> the tribal villages <strong>of</strong> Ranga reddy<br />
Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts<br />
882 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
whereas the Urban data was collected from the Hyderabad district <strong>of</strong> Telangana. A total <strong>of</strong> 400<br />
sample were selected for the study among them 200 tribal (men-100 and woman-100) and 200<br />
urban (men-100 and woman-100) population. Random sampling design was adopted for the<br />
study. Data collection was done by using self-developed structured questionnaire.<br />
Results<br />
The results showed that the tribal subjects millet consumption was higher than the urban<br />
population in all the age groups except in the 50-60 years age group. From urban population,<br />
it was noticed that high number <strong>of</strong> males consumed millets than the female population. Millet<br />
consumption in urban respondents was noticed to be high among the 40-60 years <strong>of</strong> age group<br />
which could be because <strong>of</strong> the incidence <strong>of</strong> metabolic disorders, whereas dietary habits<br />
importance and awareness was increasing day by day.<br />
Millet consumption <strong>of</strong> tribal and urban population<br />
Type <strong>of</strong> Millet<br />
Jowar Ragi Pearl millet Korra Samai Arikelu<br />
Tribal male (n=100) 100 - - - - -<br />
Tribal female(n=100) 99 1 - - - -<br />
Urban male (n=100) 14 4 - 2 - -<br />
Urban female(n=100) 10 3 - - - -<br />
The results <strong>of</strong> consumption <strong>of</strong> millet showed that 100% consumption rate among the tribal area,<br />
20% males and 13% females <strong>of</strong> the urban area but when compared to tribal population<br />
diversified consumption can be noticed from the urban population. This could be due to the<br />
high availability and affordability <strong>of</strong> millets by urban population.<br />
The results were adding strong evidence for the earlier results <strong>of</strong> reduced (blood pressure) BP<br />
and FBGs among population with the increased consumption <strong>of</strong> millets. Basal metabolic rate<br />
(BMI) also reduced with consumption frequency <strong>of</strong> millets which means the obese people can<br />
consume the millets in order to reduce their weight.<br />
Variables<br />
Correlation between BMI, BP and FBS with frequency <strong>of</strong> millet consumption<br />
Tribal (N=200)<br />
Frequency <strong>of</strong> millet consumption<br />
Urban(N=200)<br />
Male(n=100) Female(n=100) Male(n=100) Female(n=100)<br />
BMI -0.05 ** 0.11 NS -0.08 ** 0.05 *<br />
BP-Systolic 0.00 * 0.12 NS -0.09 ** 0.05 **<br />
BP-Diastolic -0.12 ** 0.18 NS 0.08 NS 0.11 NS<br />
FBG -0.09 ** -0.02 ** -0.11 ** -0.04 **<br />
Significant Level- P-value * -P
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Conclusion<br />
Transition is evident in diet consumption pattern where a complete shift from locally available<br />
millet consumption is replaced with refined rice and processed foods. Research emphasized on<br />
millet is recognized as nourishing the common population and to help in preventing and curing<br />
the diseases like obesity, diabetes and cardiovascular diseases (CVD). Hence research and<br />
development efforts on these nutritious millets need to be undertaken in order to explore their<br />
full potential.<br />
References<br />
Coulibaly, A., Kouakou, B and Chen, J. 2011. Phytic acid in cereal grains: structure, healthy<br />
or harmful ways to reduce phytic acid in cereal grains and their effects on nutritional<br />
quality. American J. Plant Nutri. Fert. Tech. 1: 1 -22.<br />
Izadi, Z., Nasirpour, A., Izadi, M and Izadi, T. 2012. Reducing blood cholesterol by a healthy<br />
diet. Int. Food. Res. J. 19 (1): 29-37.<br />
Jukanti, A. K., Gowda, C. L., Rai, K. N., Manga, V. K and Bhatt, R. K. 2016. Crops that feed<br />
the world. Pearl Millet (Pennisetum glaucum L.): an important source <strong>of</strong> food security,<br />
nutrition and health in the arid and semi-arid tropics. Food Sec. 8(2), 307-329.<br />
Shirisha, J., Lakshmi, V. V., Devi, K. U and Preethi, M. 2019. Expenditure pattern <strong>of</strong> tribal<br />
and urban population, Telangana. Bulletin <strong>of</strong> Environment, Pharmacology and Life<br />
Sciences. 8 (6):101-104.<br />
Shobana, S., Sreerama, Y.N and Malleshi, N.G. 2009. Composition and enzyme inhibitory<br />
properties <strong>of</strong> Finger Millet (Eleusine Coracana L.) seed coat phenolics: mode <strong>of</strong><br />
Inhibition <strong>of</strong> Α-Glucosidase and pancreatic amylase. Food. Chem. 115: 1268-1273.<br />
Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts<br />
T6-38P-1391<br />
Awareness <strong>of</strong> Natural Resource Management among farm women<br />
Methodology<br />
S.G. Puri, S.G. More and B. V. Asewar<br />
College <strong>of</strong> Agriculture, Golegaon<br />
Present investigation was carried out with the objectives to study pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> the farm women,<br />
to know the awareness level about Natural Resource Management (NRM) among farm women,<br />
to find out the relationship between pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> farm women with awareness level about NRM<br />
in farming system and to invite the suggestions about Natural Resource Management in<br />
farming system in Parbhani District from Marathwada region <strong>of</strong> Maharashtra State. From<br />
Parbhani District five villages Pokharni, Daithna, Rampuri, Salapuri and Dhanora (Kale) were<br />
884 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
purposively selected. Twelve number <strong>of</strong> farm women were selected randomly from these<br />
selected five villages. Thus, totally 60 farm women were interviewed. The data were collected<br />
personally by using the structured interview schedule with major focus on solar energy<br />
utilisation. According to the estimates <strong>of</strong> the International Energy Agency, India is the world’s<br />
fourth largest energy consumer after United States, China and Russia and will be the third<br />
largest by 2030 (Bharati Joshi et al., 1992). Solar energy is the radiant light and heat from the<br />
sun that is harnessed using a range <strong>of</strong> ever-evolving technologies such as solar heating,<br />
photovoltaics, solar thermal energy, solar architecture, molten salt power plants and artificial<br />
photosynthesis (International Energy Agency, 2011).<br />
Results<br />
Findings <strong>of</strong> the study revealed that majority <strong>of</strong> farm women had correct awareness on solar<br />
energy (81.67 per cent) followed by solar energy can also be used in agriculture (80.00 per<br />
cent). In many aspects related to Natural Resource Management among farm women were<br />
unaware. Overall awareness level about Natural Resource Management among farm women<br />
had low awareness. There was positive and highly significant relationship between education,<br />
risk orientation and scientific orientation with their awareness Natural Resource Management.<br />
All (100.00%) <strong>of</strong> the farm women suggested subsidies should be made available to farmers for<br />
solar-powered machinery and farmers are being encouraged to employ solar energy in their<br />
farming systems. Also, majority <strong>of</strong> the farm women suggested that developing the strong<br />
linkage between government and the farmers.<br />
Statement wise distribution <strong>of</strong> awareness level about Natural Resource Management<br />
among farm women .<br />
S No Statement Frequency Percent<br />
1. Do you know about renewable sources <strong>of</strong> energy? 35 58.33<br />
2. Do you know about the solar energy? 49 81.67<br />
3. Is solar energy can also be used in agriculture? 48 80.00<br />
4. Do you know about solar crop and grain dryer? 0 0.00<br />
5. Do you know about solar water heater? 39 65.00<br />
6. Do you know about solar spray pumps? 1 1.67<br />
7. Do you know about solar water lifting pump? 0 0.00<br />
8. Do you know about different types <strong>of</strong> solar water lifting pumps? 1 1.67<br />
9. Do you know direct current (DC) and alternate current (AC) solar<br />
pumps?<br />
10. Do you know about the land size required for 1 HP, 3 HP, 5 HP and 7<br />
HP pump?<br />
11. Do you know the approximate cost <strong>of</strong> a solar water pump system <strong>of</strong> 1<br />
HP, 3 HP, 5 HP and 7 HP?<br />
0 0.00<br />
0 0.00<br />
1 1.67<br />
12. Do you know about the operating cost <strong>of</strong> solar pumps? 3 5.00<br />
885 | Page Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
13. Are there any criteria for selecting where to install the solar water<br />
pump sets?<br />
0 0.00<br />
14. Do you know about the components <strong>of</strong> photovoltaic water pumps? 0 0.00<br />
15. Does solar energy help to solve the irrigation problem? 5 8.33<br />
16. Can solar water pump integrate with drip/sprinkler system <strong>of</strong><br />
irrigation?<br />
1 1.67<br />
17. Does solar pump require any repair and maintenance? 5 8.33<br />
18. Is it necessary to clean the panels? 42 70.00<br />
19. Can solar system use batteries to store extra power for use at night? 1 1.67<br />
20. Is it possible to couple batteries with a solar powered pump system? 1 1.67<br />
21 Do you know about solar lanterns? 2 3.33<br />
22 Do you know about solar street lights? 40 66.67<br />
23 Do you know about solar household electrical system? 1 1.67<br />
24 Do you know about solar photovoltaic sprayer? 0 0.00<br />
Coefficient <strong>of</strong> correlation between pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> farm women with awareness level<br />
about Natural Resource Management in farming system<br />
Sr. No. Independent variable Coefficient <strong>of</strong> correlation (r)<br />
1 Age -0.231 NS<br />
2 Education 0.493**<br />
3 Occupation 0.193 NS<br />
4 Land holding 0.049 NS<br />
5 Annual income 0.004 NS<br />
6 Extension contact -0.238 NS<br />
7 Risk orientation 0.337**<br />
8 Scientific orientation 0.348**<br />
* Significant at 0.05 level <strong>of</strong> significance<br />
**Significant at 0.01 level <strong>of</strong> significance NS Non-significant<br />
Distribution <strong>of</strong> the farm women according to Suggestions about about Natural Resource<br />
Management in farming system.<br />
Sr. No. Suggestions Frequency Percent<br />
1 Spare components for solar panels should be readily<br />
available on the market.<br />
2 Developing the strong linkage between government and the<br />
farmers.<br />
50 83.33<br />
55 91.66<br />
3 Make the solar water pumps easily available to farmers. 40 66.66<br />
4 Farmers are being encouraged to employ solar energy in<br />
their farming systems.<br />
60 100.00<br />
Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts<br />
886 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
5 Weather predictions should be supplied on a weekly basis<br />
properly village to village.<br />
6 Farmers should be informed on the most up-to-date solar<br />
energy technology.<br />
7 Organize farmer training courses and camps for awareness<br />
<strong>of</strong> solar energy utilization.<br />
8 Subsidies should be made available to farmers for solarpowered<br />
machinery.<br />
30 50.00<br />
52 86.66<br />
55 91.66<br />
60 100.00<br />
References<br />
Bharati Joshi, Bhatti T.S, Bansal N.K, Energy Policy, Volume 17, Issue 9, September 1992,<br />
pp. 869-876.<br />
International Energy Agency (2011). https://www.iae.org<br />
T6-39P-1436<br />
Impact <strong>of</strong> NICRA Project Through Analysis <strong>of</strong> Different Success Point<br />
Rajiv Kumar*<br />
Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Palamu-822102, Birsa Agricultural University, Ranchi, Jharkhand<br />
*rjv123kmr@gmail.com<br />
Palamu KVK got NICRA (National Innovations on Climate Resilient Agriculture) project<br />
during 2010-11. Khagribari village under Palamu-2 Block selected purposively (KVK Adopted<br />
Village) for implementation <strong>of</strong> the NICRA project. Several activities were done during 2010-<br />
11 to 2020-21. Majority <strong>of</strong> the farmers <strong>of</strong> Khagrabari village were marginal farmer. Flood,<br />
irrigation, water conservation, diseases infestation on plant and occupational migration were<br />
the major problem <strong>of</strong> the village. Some innovative and progressive farmers were developed<br />
and exposed their activity through different programme. In our study we discuss about the few<br />
successes point <strong>of</strong> NICRA project in Palamu District. The objective <strong>of</strong> the study was to show<br />
the impact <strong>of</strong> NICRA project in Palamu District through analysis <strong>of</strong> different success point.<br />
Palamu is situated between 23 0 50’ and 24 0 80’N to 83 0 55’ to 85 0 30’E latitude and at an altitude<br />
<strong>of</strong> 222.00 m above from mean sea level. However, the normal rainfall in Plamau is 1257.8 mm.<br />
Total geographical area <strong>of</strong> the district is 524690 ha (5043. 85 km 2 ). Out <strong>of</strong> which nearly<br />
1,73,553 hectares comes under net cultivable land, 1,67,848 hectares is covered by forest and<br />
24,750 hectares comes under barren and non-cultivated land. Murma Dulsulma village under<br />
Satbarwa Block was selected purposively for implementation <strong>of</strong> NICRA project. Village was<br />
selected on the basis <strong>of</strong> climate vulnerability.<br />
Technology and impacts<br />
Solid waste management through composting: Organic matter always plays pivotal role in<br />
minimizing the effect <strong>of</strong> global warming by way <strong>of</strong> reducing fluctuation in diurnal temperature<br />
887 | Page Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
variation and also minimizing the maximum soil temperature. Further organic matter reduces<br />
the irrigation water requirement and thus reduces environmental pollution also. Considering<br />
this Palamu KVK took initiative to popularize the use <strong>of</strong> organic manure by promoting the<br />
technology <strong>of</strong> compost preparation Palamu Krishi Vigyan Kendra initiated demonstration<br />
programme for proper utilization <strong>of</strong> cow dung, rural farm waste, kitchen wastes, other locally<br />
available organic waste materials and organic residues through preparation <strong>of</strong> compost by<br />
NADEP method to cut down the shortage <strong>of</strong> availability <strong>of</strong> organic manures. Demonstration<br />
was also organized on low-cost preparation <strong>of</strong> compost by heap method. Awareness was also<br />
developed to improve the quality <strong>of</strong> cow dung manure with minimum interference.<br />
Impact: Laboratory analysis <strong>of</strong> samples collected indicated that quality <strong>of</strong> organic manures<br />
produced through NADEP or heap method was much better than that used by farmers <strong>of</strong> the<br />
village. It is also too noteworthy that use <strong>of</strong> organic manure has increased 143 ton from the<br />
Bench marks (when compared with status <strong>of</strong> organic manure use before inception <strong>of</strong> the project<br />
at the village). Bohita village was promoted organic manure production through composting<br />
under MGNREGA with technical support from Palamu Krishi Vigyan Kendra.<br />
Use <strong>of</strong> black polythene mulch in winter cucumber: Cucumber is pr<strong>of</strong>itable crop. This crop<br />
is primarily grown in the summer months. But farmers <strong>of</strong> this village prefer to grow this crop<br />
during rabi season as price <strong>of</strong> this crop remain high during winter months. Problem arises when<br />
winter temperature comes below 12 °C which not only affect physiological growth but also<br />
hampers fruit set and development <strong>of</strong> cucumber. Black polythene mulch was used to increase<br />
soil temperature thereby getting rid <strong>of</strong> the problems associated with low temperature.<br />
Comparative performance <strong>of</strong> technology: This technology performed well under stressful<br />
environment during winter and it out-yielded the traditional practice <strong>of</strong> growing cucumber<br />
without mulch. On an average, soil temperature under mulch was 1-1.5°C higher during day<br />
and 4.5-5 °C during night as compared to crop without mulch which increased fruiting period<br />
by 21 days, decreasing flower drop by 12% and advancement <strong>of</strong> fruiting 5 days under mulch.<br />
Black polythene mulching in cucumber resulted in an yield increase <strong>of</strong> 8.19% compared to<br />
local practice. The net returns and B:C ratio were Rs.108200 ha -1 and 2.6 in treatment compared<br />
to Rs.97700 ha -1 and 2.51 under local practice.<br />
Renovation <strong>of</strong> existing pond for harvesting, storing and recycling <strong>of</strong> rain water<br />
A large area <strong>of</strong> the NICRA adopted village remains uncultivated during rabi seasons as only<br />
10% <strong>of</strong> total cultivated area were irrigated using well by lifting ground water as well as canal<br />
water. Though there exist a number <strong>of</strong> small and large size ponds but most <strong>of</strong> them were<br />
seasonal and cannot be used as source <strong>of</strong> irrigation during critical stages <strong>of</strong> rabi crops. The<br />
NICRA village (Murma Dulsulma) <strong>of</strong> Palamu district experiences annual rainfall <strong>of</strong> about<br />
1257.8 mm received mostly during the period from July- September but most <strong>of</strong> the water<br />
Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts<br />
888 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
bodies <strong>of</strong> the village are 5-7 ft deep and remain dry from December onwards. Palamu KVK<br />
renovated 6 numbers <strong>of</strong> pond through NICRA project which increases 76830 cubic foot <strong>of</strong><br />
pond volume and as result additional 8.5 ha <strong>of</strong> land irrigated during rabi season. It was found<br />
from the demonstration that 16399 cubic feet water was saved due to use <strong>of</strong> rain water. The<br />
farmers <strong>of</strong> NICRA village were facing problems <strong>of</strong> irrigation in rabi season crops (Potato,<br />
wheat, mustard, brinjal, garlic, cabbage etc.) due to limited irrigation sources. More than 3 <strong>of</strong><br />
the pond owners <strong>of</strong> village were communicated to Palamu KVK for renovation <strong>of</strong> their water<br />
bodies to store the rain water and solve the problems <strong>of</strong> irrigation to rabi crops with special<br />
emphasis on vegetables during December to February.<br />
Brief about the technology: Tomato is a major cash crop <strong>of</strong> Palamu district. In the NICRA<br />
adopted village poor productivity <strong>of</strong> tomato crop (145.5 q ha -1 ) was a major concern for the<br />
farmers. In this region soil acidity and occurrence <strong>of</strong> bacterial wilt was the major factors<br />
triggering poor productivity. Swarn Naveen is a bacterial wilt tolerant variety was introduced<br />
by the KVK through NICRA project in the form <strong>of</strong> demonstration in kharif season resulted in<br />
an yield <strong>of</strong> 165 q ha -1 (13.75% increase in yield). Soil acidity, one <strong>of</strong> the major predisposing<br />
factors for the wilt pathogen, was corrected through liming. The variety performed well in<br />
stressful environment and it out-yielding the Swarn Naveen variety due to less incidence <strong>of</strong><br />
bacterial wilt pathogen. On an average, there was 13.75% increase in fruit yield with 18.4%<br />
reduction in wilt in demonstration plots against the untreated local checks.<br />
Economics <strong>of</strong> the technology<br />
Economics <strong>of</strong> demonstration (Rs. ha -1 ) Economics <strong>of</strong> Local (Rs. ha -1 )<br />
Gross<br />
Cost<br />
Gross<br />
Return<br />
Net<br />
Return<br />
BCR<br />
Gross<br />
Cost<br />
Gross<br />
Return<br />
Net<br />
Return<br />
59400 165000 105600 2.78 55900 145500 89600 2.60<br />
Conclusion<br />
It may conclude from the above study that NICRA project was a successful project in Palamu<br />
District. The major highlighting points <strong>of</strong> above study that horizontal impact <strong>of</strong> the Project and<br />
attachment with the different line department with this project. The project extended its impact<br />
through different farmers club, SHGs and district line department. KVK scientists perceived<br />
that the motivation and interest level <strong>of</strong> farmers <strong>of</strong> NICRA adopted Village on agriculture were<br />
high compared to other village (Distance more than 35 Km NICRA adopted Village, Palamu).<br />
The first and foremost objectives <strong>of</strong> the project which was perceived by scientist and farmer<br />
that adoption <strong>of</strong> new technology with changing <strong>of</strong> agro climatic, agro-ecology and<br />
demographic condition and ultimate aim to establish the resilience agriculture system.<br />
BCR<br />
889 | Page Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
T6-P40-1441<br />
Intercropping with Sugarcane for DFI in Eastern Uttar Pradesh<br />
Ashok Rai 1 , Shamsher Singh 1 , Ajay K. Rai 1 , Neeraj Singh 2 , Vishal Singh 1<br />
and Vinay Kr. Patel 1<br />
1<br />
Krishi Vigyan kendra (ICAR-IIVR) Sargatia Seorahi, Kushinagar (U.P.) -274406<br />
2 ICAR-IIVR Varanasi (U.P.)<br />
A series <strong>of</strong> experiments was undertaken to assess “Intercropping in sugarcane for DFI in eastern<br />
Uttar Pradesh” at Amawa Khas Nyay panchayat <strong>of</strong> district Kushinagar in eastern Uttar Pradesh<br />
during 2018 to 2020 under National Innovation in Climate Resilient Agriculture (NICRA)<br />
Project. The number <strong>of</strong> farming community members involved in this series <strong>of</strong> demonstration<br />
were 46 in 2018, 100 in 2019 and 118 in 2020. The Experimental results revealed that the gross<br />
monetary returns were higher in sugarcane + potato system as compared to other inter-cropping<br />
systems with sugarcane. Among the inter-cropping systems assessed, sugarcane with potato<br />
was the most remunerative in respect <strong>of</strong> average production/yield at 992.8 q/ha with an average<br />
net return <strong>of</strong> INR 275560.0 and BCR <strong>of</strong> 3.54. The average production <strong>of</strong> Sugarcane-Potato<br />
intercrop was 992.8 q/ ha (Sugarcane- 883.3q/ha and potato 109.5q/ha) as compared to<br />
Sugarcane - Mustard (Sugarcane- 840.7q/ha and Mustard 9.1q/ha), Sugarcane-Lentil<br />
(Sugarcane- 825.4 q/ha and lentil 4.5 q/ha) respectively.<br />
T6-P41-1451<br />
Agricultural Market Intelligence Centre - Forecasting <strong>of</strong> Redgram Prices<br />
in Telangana State by ARIMAX<br />
R. Vijaya Kumari, A. Sreenivas * , G. Ramakrishna and P. Venkatesh<br />
College <strong>of</strong> Agriculture, Pr<strong>of</strong>essor Jayashankar Telangana State Agricultural University, Hyderabad<br />
*akulasreenivas948@gmail.com<br />
The Agricultural Market Intelligence Centre established in PJTSAU with the financial support<br />
<strong>of</strong> the Marketing Department, Government <strong>of</strong> Telangana is developing and disseminating price<br />
forecasts <strong>of</strong> sixteen major agricultural commodities produced in Telangana State. Redgram is<br />
one <strong>of</strong> the major rainfed crops largely cultivated in the state. ARIMAX model has been applied<br />
to forecast redgram prices in Telangana State which includes time series data on rainfall as<br />
input exogenous variable. When an ARIMA model includes other time series as input variables,<br />
the model is referred to as an ARIMAX model. The autoregressive integrated moving average<br />
with exogenous variable (ARIMAX) model can take the impact <strong>of</strong> covariates on the forecasting<br />
into account, improving the comprehensiveness and accuracy <strong>of</strong> the prediction. The ARIMA<br />
and ARIMAX models were compared by setting different combinations <strong>of</strong> input data.<br />
Particularly, ARIMA includes only the monthly model prices, while ARIMAX includes the<br />
Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts<br />
890 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
monthly model prices and Rainfall data. Based on preliminary testing, ARIMAX (111) is found<br />
to be the best model for future projections <strong>of</strong> redgram prices in Telangana State. The analysis<br />
<strong>of</strong> 20 years monthly data from April 2002 to November 2022 predicted that redgram price per<br />
quintal may prevail around Rs. 6720-6980 in the next four months i.e., peak harvesting time<br />
period. The centre has predicted pre-sowing and pre-harvest price <strong>of</strong> redgram during kharif<br />
2021-22, previous season as Rs. 6000-6300 and Rs. 5800-6000 per quintal. The actual prices<br />
prevailed for redgram in major markets <strong>of</strong> Telangana during the peak harvesting time period<br />
<strong>of</strong> kharif 2021-22 was in the range <strong>of</strong> Rs. 5900-6300. It was observed that the actual prices<br />
were deviated only by -0.82% from pre-sowing price forecast and by 3.28% from the preharvest<br />
price forecast. These results clearly confirms the precision and reliability <strong>of</strong> price<br />
forecast information from the Agricultural Market Intelligence Centre, PJTSAU for making<br />
better production and marketing related decisions by the farmers and other stakeholders like<br />
traders and policy makers.<br />
6T-P42-1458<br />
Additional Income Through Cultivation <strong>of</strong> Redgram on Paddy Field Bunds<br />
S. Neelaveni 1 , P Venkatarao 2 , G.S.Roy 3 and D.Chinnamnaidu 3<br />
1 KVK, Amadalavalasa,<br />
2 DAATTC, Srikakulam,<br />
3 Agricultural College, Naira<br />
On farm trail was conducted on assessment <strong>of</strong> redgram varieties suitable for cultivation on paddy<br />
field bunds in different farming situation <strong>of</strong> 38 mandals across Srikakulam district <strong>of</strong> Andhra<br />
Pradesh. Lack <strong>of</strong> suitable variety was a constraint for cultivation <strong>of</strong> redgram on paddy field bunds<br />
in Srikakulam district, The new variety ICP 7035 has recorded higher yields than the farmer’s<br />
practice(LRG 45 and LRG 52). ICP 7035 was recorded 53% more yield than LRG-52. Farmers<br />
were realising additional income <strong>of</strong> rupees 11000/- from cultivation <strong>of</strong> redgram on per acre <strong>of</strong><br />
paddy field bunds.The new variety ICP 7035 duration wise 10 to 15 days early (140-145 days) than<br />
LRG-52(160 days) .The new variety ICP 7035 was recorded higher yield (53% higher than LRG-<br />
52) than the farmer’s practice. Variety availability in local area, was one <strong>of</strong> the constraints faced.<br />
The new variety ICP 7035 duration wise 10 to 15 days early (140-145 days) LRG-52(160 days)<br />
Yield wise more than LRG-52. Red gram variety ICP 7035 perfomed well when compared to<br />
LRG-52.<br />
891 | Page Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
T6-P43-1500<br />
Impact <strong>of</strong> Frontline Demonstrations on Yield <strong>of</strong> Wheat (Triticum aestivum)<br />
under NICRA Villages <strong>of</strong> District Jhansi U.P.<br />
Adesh Kumar, Nishi Roy, Md Ramjan Shekh, Vimal Raj Yadav and Atik Ahamad<br />
KVK, Jhansi (Banda University <strong>of</strong> Agriculture and Technology, Banda)<br />
kvkjhansi@gmail.com<br />
Wheat is the second most important food crop in India after rice. It is one <strong>of</strong> the most<br />
imperative and consumed principal foods at global level. Particularly the wheat species<br />
Triticum aestivum (L.) accounts for one-fifth <strong>of</strong> the total calories delivered to the world<br />
population (Reynolds et al., 2010). Wheat has a carbohydrate-rich composition, mainly in the<br />
form <strong>of</strong> starch, and has proteins, lipids, vitamins and minerals. It is grown in an area <strong>of</strong><br />
34.6 million hectares area with production 109.2 million tonnes and productivity <strong>of</strong> 4960<br />
kg/ha. The present study was carried out by Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Jhansi to know the yield<br />
gaps between improved package and practices under Front Line Demonstration (FLD) and<br />
farmer’s practice (FP) <strong>of</strong> wheat crop in NICRA villages under heat stress condition.<br />
Methodology<br />
During rabi 2022-221 and 2021-22, frontline demonstrations (FLD) were conducted on<br />
thermo-insensitive variety “Raj-4049” in 45.0 ha area for 112 beneficiaries/ farmers <strong>of</strong> Jhansi<br />
district by KVK, Jhansi (BUAT Banda). The demonstrations were conducted in 3 NICRA<br />
(National Innovation on Climate Resilient Agriculture Project) villages- Gandhinagar, Birgua<br />
and Babaltada in Badagaon block <strong>of</strong> Jhansi district. Among input, 40.0 kg seed <strong>of</strong> improved<br />
wheat variety Raj-4079 per acre per farmer were given in 10 clusters for 112 beneficiaries<br />
under FLD. Sowing <strong>of</strong> crop by farmers in ten clusters was done during second fortnight <strong>of</strong><br />
November, Rabi 2021 & 2022.<br />
Results<br />
The data on wheat yield indicated that the FLDs gave a good impact on the farming community<br />
<strong>of</strong> Jhansi district as they were motivated by the new agricultural technologies adopted in the<br />
demonstrations. Average wheat yield under front line demonstrations was 4350 kg/ha & 4250<br />
kg/ha during rabi 2021 and 2022 respectively. This were 42.62 and 33.46 % higher than<br />
farmer’s practices (Wheat var. Local).<br />
Conclusion<br />
Thermo-insensitive wheat variety “Raj-4049 had good yield potential under NICRA villages<br />
as compared to local cultivar. The yield <strong>of</strong> this variety was 42.62 and 33.46 % higher than local<br />
cultivar.<br />
Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts<br />
892 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
References<br />
Reynolds, M, D., Bonnett, S.C., Chapman, R.T., Furbank, Y Manès, D.E., Mather, 2018.<br />
Raising yield potential <strong>of</strong> wheat. I. Overview <strong>of</strong> a consortium approach and breeding strategies.<br />
J. Exp Botany 62: 439–452.<br />
T6-P44-1502<br />
Impact Assessment on Yield and Economics <strong>of</strong> Improved Varieties <strong>of</strong> Pea<br />
(Pisum sativum L.) through Technology Demonstration in NICRA Villages<br />
<strong>of</strong> Tehri Garhwal, Uttarakhand<br />
Aalok G. Yewale, Udit Joshi, Shikha, Naveen Tariyal and C. Tiwari<br />
Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Veer Chandra Singh Garhwali Uttarakhand University <strong>of</strong> Horticulture and<br />
Forestry Ranichauri, Tehri Garhwal 249199 (Uttarakhand)<br />
Pea (Pisum sativum L.) is an important nutritious leguminous cool season crop grown<br />
throughout the world mostly during cool seasons. Pea crop is a rich source <strong>of</strong> protein,<br />
carbohydrates, vitamin A, vitamin C, calcium, phosphorous and several amino acids (Pandey<br />
and Uniyal 2018). Pea crop can fetch very high returns in hilly regions <strong>of</strong> Uttarakhand if grown<br />
in prior seasons to plain regions. Also, the mid-hill conditions <strong>of</strong> Uttarakhand are ideally suited<br />
for <strong>of</strong>f-season cultivation <strong>of</strong> Pea. Hence, selection <strong>of</strong> a suitable and appropriate variety and<br />
season becomes very crucial in hilly regions for gaining high monetary returns and boosting<br />
farmer’s income (Tiwari et al. 2014). The low productivity <strong>of</strong> Pea crop is attributed towards<br />
several constraints like lack <strong>of</strong> quality and improved cultivars, lesser use <strong>of</strong> inputs and poor<br />
extension services delivered to the farmers (Tiwari et al. 2021). By keeping all these factors<br />
under consideration, several front-line demonstrations using improved cultivars <strong>of</strong> Pea crop<br />
were carried out in the NICRA villages Dabri and Kaleth from year 2019-20 to 2021-22 to<br />
enhance the productivity and economic returns per unit area in the farmer’s field.<br />
Methodology<br />
The present investigation was carried out in the NICRA villages i.e., Dabri and Kaleth under<br />
Thauldhar block <strong>of</strong> district Tehri Garhwal during 2019-20 to 2021-22 under Technology<br />
demonstration component (TDC) <strong>of</strong> project NICRA. The improved and high yielding varieties<br />
<strong>of</strong> Pea (Arkel and PSM-3) were used by KVK, Tehri Garhwal, Uttarakhand for carrying out<br />
front line demonstrations in fields <strong>of</strong> around 45 farmers in the NICRA villages to quantify the<br />
technology gap and extension gap between demonstration and farmer’s practice. Frequent<br />
visits as well as advisories were delivered to the farmers to implement the technology correctly.<br />
The data pertaining to yield under demonstration and farmer’s practice was collected by<br />
random crop harvesting methods and was analysed by using simple statistical tools. The<br />
extension gap, technology gap and technology index were calculated using the following<br />
893 | Page Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
formula: 1. Percent increase in yield = [(Yield under demonstration - Yield under Existing<br />
practices)/ Yield under Existing practices)] x 100 2. Technology gap = Potential yield - Yield<br />
under demonstration, 3. Extension gap = Yield under demonstration - Yield under Existing<br />
practices 4. Technology index = [(Potential yield - Yield under demonstration)/Potential yield)]<br />
x 100.<br />
Results<br />
The data pertaining to the yield, percent increase in yield, technology gap, extension gap and<br />
technological index is presented in Table 1 and data related to economic impact <strong>of</strong> improved<br />
varieties <strong>of</strong> Pea is tabulated in Table 2.<br />
Yield, Percent increase, Technology gap, Extension gap and Technological index<br />
The results obtained from the present study revealed that the average yield under demonstration<br />
(90 q/ha) was much higher than the existing/farmer’s practices (60.66 q/ha) and the average<br />
percent increase in the demonstration yield over the farmer’s practice was around 48.29%<br />
which might be due to the higher yield potential <strong>of</strong> the improved varieties used in the<br />
demonstration. The average technology gap observed was around 23.33 q/ha which might be<br />
due to the varied climatic conditions, difference in status <strong>of</strong> soil fertility and local farm<br />
management practices. The results were in accordance with the findings <strong>of</strong> Singh et al. 2019<br />
and Shikha et al. 2021 in the onion crop. The average extension gap was 29.33 q/ha which<br />
might be due to the lack <strong>of</strong> availability <strong>of</strong> high yielding varieties to the farmers and lesser<br />
scientific technologies followed in the cultivation practices. The average technology index was<br />
observed to be around 19.99% which might be due to the prevalence <strong>of</strong> frost damage, cold<br />
waves, several diseases and insect pest infestations.<br />
Economic analysis<br />
Cultivation <strong>of</strong> improved varieties <strong>of</strong> vegetable pea (Arkel and PSM-3) led to the higher average<br />
net returns i.e., 48618 Rs. / hectare as compared to the farmer’s practices (26146 Rs./hectare).<br />
While the average Benefit: Cost ratio was also observed higher in case <strong>of</strong> improved varieties<br />
i.e., 2.09 when compared to existing practices (1.68) which might be due to the higher yield<br />
potential <strong>of</strong> the demonstrated improved varieties <strong>of</strong> vegetable Pea.<br />
Conclusion<br />
The results obtained from the present study revealed that the demonstration <strong>of</strong> improved<br />
varieties <strong>of</strong> Pea produced significant positive results in terms <strong>of</strong> yield and economics <strong>of</strong> Pea<br />
crop. These positive results were obtained due to the timely technological and site-specific<br />
interventions provided to the farmers which ultimately lead to the increase yield and enhanced<br />
farm productivity. It was also observed that the higher returns can also be obtained by early/<strong>of</strong>fseason<br />
sowing and harvesting <strong>of</strong> Pea when there is unavailability <strong>of</strong> Pea from plains in the<br />
Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts<br />
894 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
market. Hence, from the present study it can be concluded that technological interventions by<br />
using improved varieties <strong>of</strong> Pea coupled with early and <strong>of</strong>f-season sowing can lead to its<br />
enhanced productivity and economics and these technologies and site-specific interventions<br />
are needed in order to improve farm productivity and pr<strong>of</strong>itability.<br />
Yield, Technology gap, Extension gap and Technological index <strong>of</strong> improved varieties <strong>of</strong><br />
Pea<br />
Year<br />
2019-<br />
20<br />
Arkel<br />
2020-<br />
21<br />
Arkel<br />
2021-<br />
22<br />
PSM-<br />
3<br />
Demo<br />
No.<br />
Area<br />
(ha)<br />
Average yield<br />
(q/ha)<br />
Demo<br />
Farmer’s<br />
practice<br />
Percent<br />
Increase<br />
(%)<br />
Technology<br />
gap (q/ha)<br />
Extension<br />
gap (q/ha)<br />
Technological<br />
index (%)<br />
45 1.75 85 60 41.66 35 25 29.16<br />
45 1.75 95 62 53.22 25 33 20.83<br />
45 1.75 90 60 50.00 10 30 10.00<br />
90 60.66 48.29 23.33 29.33 19.99<br />
Economic impact <strong>of</strong> improved varieties <strong>of</strong> Pea<br />
Year Gross cost (Rs./ha) Gross Income<br />
(Rs./ha)<br />
Demo<br />
Farmer’s<br />
practice<br />
Demo<br />
Farmer’s<br />
practice<br />
Net Return (Rs./ha)<br />
Demo<br />
Farmer’<br />
practice<br />
B:C Ratio<br />
Demo<br />
2019-20 45581 38260 93450 65964 47869 27704 2.05 1.72<br />
2020-21 46380 39270 93250 60857 46870 21587 2.01 1.54<br />
2021-22 47560 40458 99540 67687 51980 27229 2.09 1.67<br />
Average 44465 37697 93084 63844 48618 26146 2.09 1.68<br />
References<br />
Farmer’<br />
practice<br />
Pandey, P. and Uniyal, S.P. 2018. Characterization <strong>of</strong> vegetable pea genotypes under tarai<br />
regions <strong>of</strong> Uttarakhand-economic aspect. J. hill Agri. 9(1): 78-81.<br />
Tiwari, R., Bhatt, L. and Dev, R. 2014. Effect <strong>of</strong> date <strong>of</strong> sowing on growth and yield <strong>of</strong><br />
vegetable pea genotypes under rain-fed mid-hill conditions <strong>of</strong> Uttarakhand. Indian J. Horti.<br />
71(2): 288-291.<br />
Tiwari, C., Yewale, A.G., Tariyal, N., Kumar, A. and Shikha. 2021. Impact <strong>of</strong> technology<br />
demonstrations on yield and economics <strong>of</strong> Soybean (Glycine max L.) in NICRA villages <strong>of</strong><br />
895 | Page Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Tehri Garhwal, Uttarakhand. <strong>Extended</strong> Summaries: 5th International Agronomy Congress,<br />
November 23-27, 2021, India. 155-157pp.<br />
Singh, R., Dahiya, R. H. and Baghel, M. S. 2019. Impact assessment <strong>of</strong> rabi Onion variety<br />
Agrifound Light Red (AFLR) through OFTs in Sidhi District <strong>of</strong> Madhya Pradesh. Journal <strong>of</strong><br />
Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research. 6(5): 380-385.<br />
T6-P45-1541<br />
Impact <strong>of</strong> Weather based Agro-Advisory Services on Upliftment <strong>of</strong><br />
Farming Communities <strong>of</strong> Ramanathapuram District, Tamil Nadu<br />
M. Vengateswari, S. Vallal Kannan, P.Balasubramaniyan and K. Elanchezhyan<br />
Krishi vigyan kendra, Ramanathapuram<br />
ramnadkvk@tnau.ac.in<br />
Agromet Advisory Services (AAS) plays a vital role in Agriculture and allied activities by<br />
providing valuable information about all agricultural operations from land preparation to postharvesting<br />
operations with respect to prevailing weather conditions. About 66% <strong>of</strong> crop<br />
production is influenced by Agrometeorological factors. Accuracy-based forecasts will help<br />
farmers to overcome various types <strong>of</strong> losses in agriculture and allied activities (Praveen et al,<br />
2022). The main aim <strong>of</strong> AAS is to reduce the losses in agriculture and to increase the income<br />
level <strong>of</strong> farmers through accurate forecasts and the intervention <strong>of</strong> new technologies in<br />
agriculture. The farmers utilize the services <strong>of</strong> AAS to decide and follow the timely cultivation<br />
practices which in turn facilitated to obtain an increase in crop yield as well as reduced losses<br />
due to unfavorable situations. The present study was proposed to analyze the knowledge<br />
acquired and the level <strong>of</strong> impact <strong>of</strong> weather-based agro advisory services among the farmers<br />
on knowledge and productivity achievement.<br />
Methodology<br />
India Meteorological Department has taken up the Biweekly Agromet advisory service (AAS)<br />
based on medium-range forecasting to serve the farming community with important weather<br />
parameters like rainfall, temperature, wind speed and direction, cloud cover, and humidity.<br />
District AgroMet Unit, Ramanathapuram which is functional at Krishi Vigyan Kendra,<br />
Ramanathapuram is receiving the forecast since 2019 and issuing agro advisory bulletins<br />
through different media to assist the farmers. A random sample <strong>of</strong> 125 farmers was selected<br />
from different blocks <strong>of</strong> Ramanathapuram District for assessed the farmer´s knowledge and<br />
perception <strong>of</strong> agromet advisory services. Descriptive statistics was employed to find out the<br />
frequency and percentage <strong>of</strong> farmer on adoption <strong>of</strong> advisory on crop production and tabular<br />
analysis for impact study.<br />
Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts<br />
896 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Results<br />
Adoption<br />
The study indicates that AAS has provided timely service, 81 percent <strong>of</strong> the farmers are<br />
satisfied with making the decision on farming operations viz., sowing and weeding (36<br />
percent), chemical spray (84 percent), fertilizer application (57 percent) harvest and Post<br />
harvesting operations (71 percent) by the small and marginal farmers especially its economic<br />
value in terms <strong>of</strong> money by weather forecast leading to reduction in production cost, enhancing<br />
the efficacy <strong>of</strong> inputs such as fertilizer, pesticide and saving crop and its yield from weather<br />
hazards.<br />
Dissemination<br />
Mass Media have separate sections for agricultural information to the farming community.<br />
Hence mass media like television, radio, newspaper, and mobile are being effectively utilized<br />
by Krishi Vigyan Kendra to disseminate innovative adaptation and management technologies.<br />
In this regard, the survey results indicate that 70 percent <strong>of</strong> farmers get weather information<br />
through mobile (WhatsApp and SMS) followed by 13 percent through television, 12 through<br />
the newspaper, and 5 percent through radio (Fig. 1). Hence it is clearly indicating that,<br />
dissemination <strong>of</strong> weather advisories through mobile and television reached to both literate and<br />
illiterate farming communities for timely adoption <strong>of</strong> management technologies.<br />
The study revealed the perception <strong>of</strong> AAS revealed (Fig.2.) that majority <strong>of</strong> the farmers felt the<br />
importance <strong>of</strong> Agro meteorology advisory services (87 percent) and usefulness in adoption (85<br />
percent). Whereas, 70 percent <strong>of</strong> forecast accuracy and 82 percent <strong>of</strong> them felt that advisories<br />
based on predicted precipitation events are very effective and helpful for planning and<br />
execution <strong>of</strong> various farm operations.<br />
Conclusion<br />
Impact assessment is the analysis <strong>of</strong> the significant change that has occurred due to AAS<br />
intervention. By consistently delivering actionable weather information, analysis and decision<br />
support for farming situations such as farm and pest management through weather-based agro<br />
advisory services enhanced the knowledge and adoption <strong>of</strong> timely management technologies.<br />
References<br />
Praveen, K. M., Kamath, K. S., Lakshmana, R. K., & Shetty, S. 2022. Analyzing the impact <strong>of</strong><br />
weather-based agro-advisory services <strong>of</strong> GKMS project among areca nut growers <strong>of</strong><br />
Udupi district <strong>of</strong> Karnataka. Pharma innovation, SP-11(1): 07-11.<br />
897 | Page Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Farmers response on weather-based agro advisories<br />
S.No Questionnaire Farmers response<br />
1 Making decision on farm operation based on<br />
weather forecast<br />
2 Weather forecast and agro advisory on Sowing<br />
and weeding<br />
3 Weather forecast and agro advisory on<br />
insecticides pesticides/ fungicides<br />
4 Weather forecast and agro advisory on<br />
Application <strong>of</strong> fertilizer<br />
5 Weather forecast and agro advisory on<br />
harvesting and post-harvest operation<br />
6 Benefit from abnormal weather forecast<br />
advisories related to animal husbandry<br />
Frequency<br />
102 81<br />
46 36<br />
105 84<br />
72 57<br />
89 71<br />
36 29<br />
Percent (%) <strong>of</strong> adoption<br />
Transfer <strong>of</strong> AAS information<br />
Perception <strong>of</strong> AAS<br />
Importance <strong>of</strong> Solar Light Trap in Integrated Pest Management<br />
T6-P46-1556<br />
Manoj Kumar Ahirwar, Dheeraj Singh*, Aishwarya Dudi and Chandan Kumar<br />
ICAR-CAZRI Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Pali, Rajasthan-306401, India<br />
*dheerajthakurala@yahoo.com<br />
The quality and safety <strong>of</strong> agricultural products are a major concern for the entire world. The<br />
focus is controlling pesticide residue, which is especially difficult in most crops. The solution<br />
to this problem lies in the biological control <strong>of</strong> insect pests at the economic level. The solar<br />
light trap may be considered as the alternate solution that has several advantages over the<br />
Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts<br />
898 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
electrical light trap. There are several models and designs <strong>of</strong> solar light traps available in the<br />
markets that do not depend on any other source like electricity, fuel, wind power, or mechanical<br />
power. This device operates automatically i.e. turns on at 6 pm and turns <strong>of</strong>f before sunrise i.e.<br />
6 am. Most <strong>of</strong> the damage-causing insects are active during this time. Installing one light trap<br />
in an acre area attracts at least more than 1000 adult pests for a day. Nocturnal insects are <strong>of</strong>ten<br />
attracted to light sources that emit large amounts <strong>of</strong> UV radiation and devices that exploit this<br />
behavior. Thus, solar light trap provides a scientific basis for ecological control <strong>of</strong> pests in crop<br />
production reducing the volume <strong>of</strong> pesticides and resulting in the protection <strong>of</strong> the<br />
agroecological environment.<br />
T6-P47-1560<br />
Impact <strong>of</strong> Residual Soil Moisture on Yields and Pr<strong>of</strong>itability <strong>of</strong> Rainfed<br />
Cropping Sequences<br />
M.L. Jadav*, Narendra Kumawat, D.V. Bhagat, S.K. Choudhary, K.S. Bangar and<br />
Bharat Singh<br />
All India Coordinated Research Project for Dryland Farming, College <strong>of</strong> Agriculture (RVSKVV)<br />
Indore – 452 001, Madhya Pradesh, India<br />
*mjadavujn@gmail.com<br />
In agriculture, the availability <strong>of</strong> soil moisture determines the success <strong>of</strong> crop production<br />
because the growth and productivity <strong>of</strong> crops highly depend on sufficient moisture. Residual<br />
soil moisture can play important role in rabi crops. The medium to deep vertisols in the Malwa<br />
region can sustain sequential cropping with the short duration crops for about 220 days during<br />
the normal monsoon season. If heavy rainfall occurred, Kharif crops are badly affected but rabi<br />
crop production can compensate it, because <strong>of</strong> residual moisture content in rainfed conditions.<br />
Lack <strong>of</strong> adequate seed-zone moisture is a major problem in the timely sowing <strong>of</strong> rabi crops<br />
after kharif in rainfed areas.<br />
Methodology<br />
Field experiments were conducted during 2019-20 and 2020-21 at the AICRP for Dryland<br />
Agriculture, College <strong>of</strong> Agriculture (RVSKVV), Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India to find out the<br />
effect <strong>of</strong> residual soil moisture on rainfed cropping sequences in vertisols. Nine cropping<br />
sequences including soybean/maize/black gram-based cropping systems, viz., soybeanchickpea,<br />
soybean-chickpea (kabuli) soybean-safflower, maize-chickpea, maize-chickpea<br />
(kabuli), maize-safflower, blackgram-chickpea, blackgram-chickpea (kabuli) and blackgramsafflower<br />
were tested in randomized block design with 5 replications. The soil moisture content<br />
(%) was determined by gravimetric method from two depths viz., topsoil (0-15 cm) and subsoil<br />
(15-30 cm) at 20, 40, 60, and 80 DAS and at harvest. This study was conducted to evaluate the<br />
effect <strong>of</strong> residual soil moisture on yield and monetary return in rainfed cropping sequences.<br />
899 | Page Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
The yield data <strong>of</strong> sequentially grown crops were recorded and statistically analyzed in terms <strong>of</strong><br />
soybean equivalent yield (SEY) to calculate system productivity.<br />
Results<br />
The data presented in Table 1 revealed that significantly higher SEY (3504 kg/ha) was recorded<br />
by the sequence soybean -chickpea with the highest total net return <strong>of</strong> Rs. 104142/ha with a B:<br />
C ratio <strong>of</strong> 3.89 followed by blackgram-chickpea (SEY 2945 kg/ha total net return Rs. 81815/ha<br />
and B: C ratio <strong>of</strong> 3.27). Whereas, the lowest SEY (1138 kg/ha), total net return (Rs. 9510/ha),<br />
and B: C ratio (1.26) were found under the maize-safflower sequence. During the initial period<br />
<strong>of</strong> crop growth, soil moisture content was higher in the upper depth but at later stages, soil<br />
moisture content was found higher in the lower depth <strong>of</strong> the soil. It can be concluded that<br />
residual soil moisture availability can affect the yield and economics <strong>of</strong> rabi crops after Kharif<br />
season under rainfed conditions.<br />
Mean data <strong>of</strong> yield, soybean equivalent yield (SEY), total net returns and B: C ratio <strong>of</strong><br />
different crop sequences<br />
Crop<br />
sequence<br />
Yield<br />
(kg/ha)<br />
Cost <strong>of</strong><br />
cultivation<br />
(Rs./ha)<br />
SEY<br />
(kg/ha)<br />
Total return <strong>of</strong><br />
sequence (Rs./ha)<br />
Seed Straw Gross Net<br />
Soybean - 986 1403 20000 - - -<br />
Total<br />
B: C<br />
ratio<br />
Chickpea 2250 3375 16000 3504 140142 104142 3.89<br />
Chickpea<br />
(Kabuli)<br />
1313 3688 16000 2449 97955 61955 2.72<br />
Safflower 688 2125 16000 1832 73267 37267 2.04<br />
Maize - 695 2222 20000 - - - -<br />
Chickpea 2188 3438 16000 2817 112698 76698 3.13<br />
Chickpea<br />
(Kabuli)<br />
1063 3125 16000 1552 62073 26073 1.72<br />
Safflower 625 1750 16000 1138 45510 9510 1.26<br />
Black gram<br />
-<br />
417 833 20000 - - - -<br />
Chickpea 2063 2938 16000 2945 117815 81815 3.27<br />
Chickpea<br />
(Kabuli)<br />
1063 2875 16000 1820 72815 36815 2.02<br />
Safflower 750 2375 16000 1563 62502 26502 1.74<br />
S Em (±) - - - 427 - - -<br />
C D at 5 % - - - 1237 - - -<br />
Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts<br />
900 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
T6-P48-1623<br />
Technology Need Assessment <strong>of</strong> Cool Season Vegetable Growers in Kerala<br />
Alaka S. Balan * , N.E. Safiya, V.P. Indhulekha, Deepa Surendran, M.R. Ashitha and<br />
C.V. Deepa Rani<br />
KVK Wayanad,<br />
*alakaextn@gmail.com<br />
Cool season vegetable cultivation is gaining popularity in the recent years in Kerala due to the<br />
advent <strong>of</strong> tropical varieties. The current level <strong>of</strong> production <strong>of</strong> cool season vegetables is low<br />
despite immense potential for boosting its production. The productivity is low due to the reason<br />
that the farmers have not fully adopted the improved package <strong>of</strong> practices <strong>of</strong> the cool season<br />
vegetable production technology and it is mainly grown by using traditional farming practices<br />
just like other vegetables. There is a need for the full adoption <strong>of</strong> recommended cultivation<br />
practices <strong>of</strong> cool season vegetable crops by the farmers, so that the production and income level<br />
can be raised. Therefore, it is necessary to know various aspects like adoption level, technology<br />
need, and constraints responsible for non-adoption <strong>of</strong> recommended cultivation practices <strong>of</strong><br />
cool season vegetable crops by the farmers. Evolving new technology is an endeavour in the<br />
direction <strong>of</strong> increasing production efficiency. The rapid technology progress and the increased<br />
rate <strong>of</strong> outdated technologies necessitate technology forecasting for any planning progress<br />
specially to understand technology needs <strong>of</strong> cool season vegetable growers. Even non-farmers<br />
are getting attracted to growing these vegetables in homesteads and government is taking<br />
initiatives to encourage, promote and support such actions. When compared to other<br />
vegetables, cool season vegetables generate higher returns in shorter duration as the pest and<br />
disease are not so prevalent in the newly cultivated areas. Different institutions have developed<br />
technologies and disseminated the same for various crops. However, farmers have adopted the<br />
same in a differential manner owing to multifaceted factors.<br />
The present study entitled “Technology need assessment <strong>of</strong> cool season vegetable growers”<br />
was conducted in Thavinhal Grama panchayath <strong>of</strong> Wayanad district. The study aims to identify<br />
the technology needs <strong>of</strong> farmers, technology adoption for cool season vegetables and the<br />
constraints faced during cultivation <strong>of</strong> cool season vegetables.<br />
Methodology<br />
The sample size consisted <strong>of</strong> 90 cool season vegetable growers and 30 extension pr<strong>of</strong>essionals.<br />
Thus, a total <strong>of</strong> 120 respondents were selected using simple random sampling technique. An<br />
ex-post facto research design was used for the study. A well-structured interview schedule was<br />
employed for data collection from the respondents. Component wise distribution <strong>of</strong> growers<br />
based on extent <strong>of</strong> knowledge <strong>of</strong> cool season vegetable technology in the order <strong>of</strong> increasing<br />
nature was seedling treatment followed by fertilizer management, post-harvest technology,<br />
901 | Page Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
sowing technique, plant protection measures, irrigation management and pre-sowing<br />
technique. Technology adoption <strong>of</strong> selected cool season vegetable practices <strong>of</strong> KAU by farmers<br />
in Idukki and Wayanad district was assessed using the formula developed by Singh and Singh<br />
(1967). The variables were studied and analyzed with the help <strong>of</strong> different statistical tools like<br />
mean, correlation, frequency percentage analysis, Kruskal Wallis test.<br />
Results<br />
On analyzing the data, adoption <strong>of</strong> components such as pre-sowing technique, fertilizer<br />
management and post-harvest technology were found to be higher in Wayanad district. This<br />
agrees with the findings <strong>of</strong> Malla (2018) and Kant (2019).<br />
The results <strong>of</strong> the adoption quotient revealed that majority <strong>of</strong> the farmers i.e., 48.89 per cent<br />
belonged to medium category <strong>of</strong> adoption, followed by 42.22 per cent and 8.89 per cent in low<br />
and high category respectively. The mean adoption quotient (AQ) was 218.53 with a maximum<br />
and minimum adoption quotient <strong>of</strong> 323 and 123 respectively.<br />
Generalizing the results, it was interesting to note that the highest need for technology (or the<br />
low technology availability) was reported for processing, storage and value addition for cool<br />
season vegetables unlike the perceived traditional requirements. Tones <strong>of</strong> produce are wasted<br />
at the field level itself due to lower market price, climatic variations, and perishability and<br />
perhaps due to lack <strong>of</strong> storage facilities. This is in line with the findings <strong>of</strong> Thomas (2015) and<br />
Basheer (2016).<br />
The major constraints faced by cool season vegetable growers were lack <strong>of</strong> flower<br />
setting/incomplete flower setting/discoloring/undesired shape <strong>of</strong> flower due to varying climatic<br />
conditions, followed by lack <strong>of</strong> knowledge <strong>of</strong> disease resistant varieties and lack <strong>of</strong> knowledge<br />
about post-harvest technologies.<br />
Conclusion<br />
From the above findings the following conclusions can be drawn in general that majority <strong>of</strong> the<br />
cool season vegetable growers had medium level <strong>of</strong> adoption <strong>of</strong> cool season vegetable<br />
cultivation technology. Technology needs for post-harvest handling as well as value addition<br />
is demanded by the growers. From the results obtained it can be observed that there is<br />
considerable room for improvement in production and marketing and for scaling up the<br />
production through suitable extension interventions. Tailor made strategies tare to be lined up<br />
inorder to enhance the adoption <strong>of</strong> cool season vegetable growers towards taking up agriculture<br />
as a pr<strong>of</strong>itable farming enterprise.<br />
Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts<br />
902 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
References<br />
Basheer, N. 2016. Technology Utilization <strong>of</strong> Bitter gourd in Thiruvananthapuram district.<br />
M.Sc. (Ag) thesis, Kerala Agricultural University, 272p.<br />
Kant, U. 2019. Technology gap in adoption <strong>of</strong> cauliflower and cabbage production technology<br />
in Patna district. M.Sc. (Ag) thesis, Dr. Rajendra Prasad Central Agricultural University, Pusa,<br />
104p.<br />
Malla, A.K. 2018. A study on the extent <strong>of</strong> adoption on the vegetable production technology<br />
<strong>of</strong> KVK trained vegetable growers. Int. J. Educ. Sci. Res. 8(5): 1-6.<br />
Singh, K., M.P. and Singh, R. 1967. Ginger cultivation in Himachal Pradesh. Indian FMG<br />
30(11): 25-26.<br />
Thomas, A. and Kumar, N. K. 2015. Technology Need Assesment in the Homegarden Systems.<br />
J. Ext. Educ. 27(4): 5556-5563.<br />
T6-49 P<br />
Realizing Better Yield and returns <strong>of</strong> Chickpea crop through Cluster<br />
Frontline Demonstrations<br />
Ramesh Kumar, P.P. Rohilla, Narender Singh, Ashish Shivran, Poonam and<br />
Ashok Dhillon<br />
Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Mahendergarh<br />
CCS Haryana Agricultural University Hisar<br />
ICAR- Agricultural Technology Application Research Institute (ATARI), Jodhpur<br />
Chickpea is main rabi season crop grown in Mahendergarh district <strong>of</strong> Haryana state. The crop<br />
is cultivated in 8.2 thousand ha in the district. Productivity <strong>of</strong> the crop (1249 kg/ ha) is though<br />
better than state and national level yet it is very low than average yield (2500 kg/ ha) <strong>of</strong><br />
improved varieties recommended by various institutes. Gap between farmers’ practices and<br />
improved practices is one <strong>of</strong> the main reasons <strong>of</strong> low productivity. Therefore, to minimize this<br />
gap to increase productivity <strong>of</strong> chickpea crop at farmers’ fields. Demonstrations <strong>of</strong> improved<br />
technologies with integrated crop management approach at farmers’ fields through cluster<br />
frontline demonstrations is one <strong>of</strong> the ways to increase the productivity <strong>of</strong> the crop.<br />
Methodology<br />
Cluster frontline demonstration on chickpea crop were conducted during 2017-2022 at farmers’<br />
fields in Mahendergarh district <strong>of</strong> Haryana state under National Food Security Mission<br />
(NFSM) programme. Important and necessary process – selection <strong>of</strong> villages and farmers,<br />
identification <strong>of</strong> farming situation, analysis <strong>of</strong> soil samples, assessment <strong>of</strong> gaps between<br />
903 | Page Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
farmers’ practices and improved practices, identification <strong>of</strong> technologies to be demonstrated,<br />
rationalization <strong>of</strong> critical inputs, training programmes, regular monitoring visits, organizing<br />
field days, reporting <strong>of</strong> successful cases etc. was carried in an effective manner. Emphasis was<br />
laid to demonstrate those technologies for which maximum gap was observed. The<br />
technologies which were demonstrated included improved varieties (GNG-1581/1958, CSJ-<br />
515), optimum seed rate, seed treatment with chlorpyriphos, carbendazim and inoculation with<br />
rhizotika and PSB, use <strong>of</strong> fertilizers in balanced doses, proper weed management practices,<br />
management <strong>of</strong> pod borer etc. The critical inputs used by the centre were – quality seed <strong>of</strong><br />
improved varieties suitable for specific farming situation, chlorpyriphos and carbendazim,<br />
bi<strong>of</strong>ertilizers (rhizotika and PSB), insecticide novaluron. NPK fertilizers and other inputs were<br />
used by the partner farmers. Financial support for purchase <strong>of</strong> critical inputs were provided by<br />
Indian Council <strong>of</strong> Agricultural Research (ICAR) - Agricultural Technology Application<br />
Research Institute (ATARI). Observation on yield and other parameters were recorded and<br />
compared with farmers’ practice. Economics <strong>of</strong> demonstration plots and local check plots<br />
(farmers’ practice) was calculated to compare the relative performance.<br />
Results<br />
Adoption <strong>of</strong> improved practices in demonstration plots provided better yield and returns than<br />
those obtained under farmers practices. Average yield <strong>of</strong> five years in demonstration plots was<br />
19.17 q/ha which was 19.5 percent higher than Average yield <strong>of</strong> local check plots (16.04 q/ha).<br />
Better yield thus obtained in demonstration plots resulted into better net returns. Average<br />
additional net returns <strong>of</strong> ₹12445/ha were obtained in demonstration plots with av. additional<br />
cost <strong>of</strong> cultivation <strong>of</strong> ₹2320/ha resulting into higher benefit cost ratio.<br />
Conclusion<br />
Better yield and returns in demonstration plots indicate that there is possibility <strong>of</strong> minimizing<br />
extension gap by conducting cluster frontline demonstrations at farmers’ fields with integrated<br />
management approach.<br />
T6-50P-1146<br />
Achieving Fodder Self-sufficiency using Natural Farming Methods and Community<br />
Action in a Rainfed Region: The Case <strong>of</strong> Ayyavaripalli Village, India<br />
U. Sudhakar, M. Ramesh Kumar, V. Swaran and Bindu Mohanty<br />
Watershed Support Services and Activities Network (WASSAN), Hyderabad - 500068, Telangana<br />
Livestock and animal husbandry are integral parts <strong>of</strong> rainfed agriculture in India as they have<br />
multiple roles like source <strong>of</strong> income, draught power and in times <strong>of</strong> distress a source <strong>of</strong><br />
liquidity. About 70 to 90 percent <strong>of</strong> the ruminant livestock in India is estimated to be in the<br />
rainfed mixed farms (NRAA 2022) Scarcity <strong>of</strong> feed and fodder is identified as a major<br />
Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts<br />
904 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
impediment in the way <strong>of</strong> sustainable livestock development in the rainfed areas (Misra et.al<br />
2010). Deficiency <strong>of</strong> green fodder and dry fodder have been a recurring problem that the<br />
Working Group on Animal Husbandry and Dairying for the 10 th Five Year Plan has projected<br />
a deficiency 64% and 25% <strong>of</strong> each fodder respectively in the year 2025 (Planning Commission<br />
2002). Mitigating scarcity <strong>of</strong> dry fodder and managing availability <strong>of</strong> green fodder round the<br />
year to keep the livestock healthy and productive are serious challenges faced by the livestock<br />
keepers as majority <strong>of</strong> them are marginal and small landholders. This case study from the<br />
Ayyavaripalli village in the Valmikipuram/Vayalapadu Mandal <strong>of</strong> Annamayya district (part <strong>of</strong><br />
the erstwhile Chittoor district till March 2022) <strong>of</strong> Andhra Pradesh shows how the precarity <strong>of</strong><br />
livestock rearing under rainfed conditions can be reduced by sustainable solutions through<br />
fodder budgeting exercise with concerted participation <strong>of</strong> the community.<br />
Methodology<br />
An incremental, multi-year, multi-pronged, multi-species fodder development intervention was<br />
implemented in the Ayyavaripalli village and later in its nearby villages since 2018, when the<br />
annual rainfall in the village went down to 292 mm with a 54% deficit. The village <strong>of</strong> 129<br />
families with all families having milch animals, totalling 735 in 2018, has a local economy<br />
centred around dairying. The drought year <strong>of</strong> 2018 resulted in fodder scarcity that was<br />
accentuated by a shift from multi-cropping system to groundnut monocrop, which had reduced<br />
yield that year, as well as meagre economic returns from millets and pulses cultivation.<br />
Ayyavaripalli faced a deficit <strong>of</strong> around 269 tons in 2018 after accounting 370 tons <strong>of</strong> fodder<br />
from existing crops and 150 tons from other sources like commons and fallows. The deficit<br />
was met by procuring fodder from elsewhere at a cost <strong>of</strong> INR 2.9 million.<br />
Watershed Support Services and Activities Network (WASSAN), have prior experience <strong>of</strong><br />
implementing activities under the Andhra Pradesh Community managed Natural Farming<br />
(APCNF) in the region consulted with the villagers and formulated various interventions to<br />
address the fodder gap beginning from the Rabi season <strong>of</strong> 2018. Following practices were<br />
implemented for fodder cultivation; 1) Promotion <strong>of</strong> fodder development in irrigated and<br />
fallow lands <strong>of</strong> individuals; 2) Promotion <strong>of</strong> fodder development through seed dibbling in<br />
common land; 3) Promotion <strong>of</strong> fodder development in leased fallow lands; 4) Promotion <strong>of</strong><br />
millets and pulses cultivation for "Dhaana" (feed mix) preparation; and 5) Promotion <strong>of</strong> fodder<br />
plants on field bunds. Seeds <strong>of</strong> sorghum, pearl millet, field beans, horse gram and Cowpea were<br />
given to farmers for fodder crop combination.<br />
Results<br />
Out <strong>of</strong> the five interventions, three could provide desired results in terms <strong>of</strong> fodder production.<br />
Cultivation <strong>of</strong> fodder in individual cultivating lands, fallows and lands taken on lease gave<br />
encouraging results. About 318 tons <strong>of</strong> fodder was produced in Ayyavaripalli during Kharif<br />
905 | Page Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
2021. Improved availability <strong>of</strong> fodder has led to an increase in the number <strong>of</strong> cows and sheep<br />
in the village from 256 to 430 and about 600 to about 1000 respectively between 2018 and<br />
2021. The dairy economy <strong>of</strong> the village also benefited from an increased collection from 175-<br />
200 litres/day to nearly 1000 litres/day during the same time. Consequently, the milk collection<br />
centres have increased from 1 to 5. Besides Ayyavaripalli, four more clusters totalling 32<br />
villages were part <strong>of</strong> the programme and altogether 595 farmers cultivated fodder in 622 acres<br />
<strong>of</strong> land. Importantly 195 farmers have taken up the activity on their own without the programme<br />
support. The fodder development activities were primarily intended to benefit the landless<br />
families with livestock. Formation <strong>of</strong> Common Interest Groups by these families has helped in<br />
sharing the costs to take land under lease.<br />
Conclusion<br />
Mediation among community members to share resources – land, labour and material like<br />
dung, making the crisis and options visible through ‘Fodder Budgeting’, facilitating negotiated<br />
solutions, intensive support for people during initial fodder experiments to see the results on<br />
ground and natural farming methods with low input costs and high returns can help<br />
communities to move from deficits to surplus. These are the lessons emerging from the<br />
Ayyavaripalli experience and the later spread <strong>of</strong> the model into several other villages.<br />
The case study demonstrated a strategic mainstream option for enabling increased access to<br />
fallow lands in the villages to livestock farmers under negotiated agreements. Access to<br />
irrigation in such lands could further improve the productivity. The natural farming methods<br />
<strong>of</strong> production – using Ghana/Drava Jeevamrutam, pre-monsoon dry sowing with mulch,<br />
livestock penning, using multi-species crop mix – with a mix <strong>of</strong> cereals, millets, pulses for<br />
balanced nutrition aided by access to life saving irrigation can be included in the package <strong>of</strong><br />
practices. Investments in such initiatives have high cost-benefit ratios <strong>of</strong> around 1:4; and much<br />
higher social cost-benefit ratios especially in drought prone rainfed areas.<br />
References<br />
Misra, A.K, Rama Rao, C.A, and Ravishankar, K., 2010. Analysis <strong>of</strong> potentials and problems<br />
<strong>of</strong> dairy production in rainfed agro-ecosystem <strong>of</strong> India. Ind. J. Animal Sci. 80, (11):1126.<br />
NRAA (National Rainfed Area Authority). 2022. Accelerating the Growth <strong>of</strong> Rainfed<br />
Agriculture - Integrated Farmers Livelihood Approach. Ministry <strong>of</strong> Agriculture & Farmers’<br />
Welfare. p.6<br />
Planning Commission. 2002. Report <strong>of</strong> the Working Group on Animal Husbandry and Dairying<br />
for the Tenth Five Year Plan. Planning Commission, Government <strong>of</strong> India. Available at:<br />
https://niti.gov.in/planningcommission.gov.in/docs/aboutus/committee/wrkgrp/wg_anhbndry.<br />
pdf [Accessed on 15 September 2022]<br />
Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts<br />
906 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
T6-51P-1277<br />
Enhancement <strong>of</strong> Yield and Economic Indices by the Adoption <strong>of</strong> Cotton+ Redgram<br />
Intercropping System under Rainfed Conditions <strong>of</strong> Mancherial District, Telangana<br />
State<br />
I. Thirupathi, M. Rajshwar Naik, K. Shivakrishna, A. Nagaraju, U. Sravanthi, and<br />
B. Sathish Kumar<br />
Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Bellampalli, Mancherial (Dist.) – 504 251<br />
Pr<strong>of</strong>essor Jayashankar Telangana State Agricultural University, Telangana State<br />
Cotton is an important fibre and commercial crop in India as well as in the Telangana state.<br />
The crop is grown on diverse soils, varying from fine-textured black soils to coarse-textured<br />
red soils. About two-thirds <strong>of</strong> the cotton area in the Mancherial district is under rainfed<br />
conditions and faces different abiotic stresses during the crop growth period resulting in lesser<br />
yields and an increase in input costs, ultimately reducing the cost-benefit ratio. Under such<br />
circumstances, intercropping cotton with other crops provides an additional return, improves<br />
soil quality (if legume is included as intercrop), reduces climatic risks and chance <strong>of</strong> crop<br />
failure, enhances biodiversity, and ensures a greater use <strong>of</strong> resources (Maitra and Ray, 2019).<br />
As a widely spaced crop, cotton provides ample scope for the adoption <strong>of</strong> the intercropping<br />
system. Pigeonpea is suitable for inter-cropping with different crops like cotton, sorghum, pearl<br />
millet, green gram, blackgram, maize, soybean, and groundnut for increasing production and<br />
maintaining soil fertility. Pigeonpea has more advantages when it is grown under the<br />
intercropped situation. Keeping in view, redgram inter-cropped with cotton is evolved as an<br />
alternative sustainable cropping system to sole cotton in rainfed conditions to improve the<br />
yields and income <strong>of</strong> the farmers in the Mancherial district <strong>of</strong> Telangana state.<br />
Methodology<br />
Demonstration on Cotton +Redgram intercropping system under rainfed conditions was<br />
conducted as Front-line Demonstration by Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Bellampalli, Mancherial<br />
district in different locations <strong>of</strong> Mancherial district during the year 2019-20, 2020-21 and 2021-<br />
22. An area <strong>of</strong> 0.4 ha per location was chosen for study. Test varieties were selected WRG-65<br />
and WRG-97 for Redgram varieties and the quality seed were distributed to the selected<br />
farmers. Sole cotton cultivation with Bt hybrid (farmer’s practice) was compared as a control.<br />
Sowings <strong>of</strong> crops in both treatments were done during 1 st fortnight <strong>of</strong> July during the three<br />
years. Intercropping <strong>of</strong> Cotton and Redgram was sown in a 6:1 ratio at a spacing <strong>of</strong> 90 x 60 cm<br />
for the row to row and plant to plant for both cotton and redgram respectively. The crop was<br />
grown under rainfed conditions only. The data on Plant population, cotton, and redgram yields<br />
were collected by random crop cutting method.<br />
907 | Page Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Results<br />
Average Yield, Equivalent Yield, and LER <strong>of</strong> cotton+ redgram intercropping system<br />
during 2019-20, 2020-21 and 2021-22<br />
Year Yield (kg/ha) Cotton<br />
equivalent<br />
ratio<br />
Cotton<br />
(Demo)<br />
+Redgram<br />
Sole Cotton<br />
(Check)<br />
Demo<br />
Check<br />
%<br />
increase<br />
in yield<br />
over<br />
check<br />
2019-20 1678 422 1791 2083 1791 14.0 1.34<br />
2020-21 1485 522 1696 2091 1696 18.8 1.30<br />
2021-22 1447 539 1583 1804 1583 12.2 1.26<br />
Mean 1537 494 1690 1993 1690 15.0 1.30<br />
Land<br />
equivalent<br />
ratio<br />
(LER)<br />
In the cropping system/intercropping system the yield <strong>of</strong> the system can be represented in<br />
equivalent yields <strong>of</strong> the main crop. The highest cotton equivalent yields recorded with cotton+<br />
redgram intercropping system compared to sole cotton during the three years. The average<br />
cotton equivalent yield was 2083 kg/ha, 2091kg/ha, and 1804 kg/ha respectively during 2019-<br />
20, 2020-21, and 2021-22 and the mean cotton equivalent yield was 1993 kg/ha. The CEY is<br />
less during the year 2021-22 due to the high market price <strong>of</strong> cotton kapas compared to other<br />
years. The average increase in the yield <strong>of</strong> the demo were 14 %, 18.8 % and 12.2 % over the<br />
check (sole cotton) and the mean increase <strong>of</strong> the yield <strong>of</strong> the demo is 15 % over the check.<br />
Blaise et al., 2005 found that cotton +redgram intercropping was one <strong>of</strong> the effective crop<br />
combinations where mean cotton equivalent yield was recorded high over sole cotton. The<br />
average Land equivalent ratio (LER) is 1.34, 1.30, and 1.20 during 2019-20, 2020-21, and<br />
2021-22 respectively and the mean LER value is 1.30. The LER denotes the benefits <strong>of</strong> an<br />
intercropping system to utilize the resources as against their pure stands. In all the years the<br />
LER values are greater than one which means the cotton + redgram intercropping system is<br />
advantageous. Similar findings were noticed by Oda et al., (2007).<br />
Average Economic indices and per day net returns <strong>of</strong> demo and check during 2019-20,<br />
2020-21, and 2021-22<br />
Cost<br />
cultivation<br />
(Rs/ha)<br />
<strong>of</strong><br />
Gross returns<br />
(Rs/ha)<br />
Net returns<br />
(Rs/ha)<br />
B:C ratio<br />
Per day net<br />
returns<br />
(Rs/ha)<br />
Demo Check Demo Check Demo Check Demo Check Demo Check<br />
2019-20 50250 52325 109610 94034 59306 41709 2.17 1.19 329 232<br />
2020-21 49799 51848 100733 82256 50934 33408 2.02 1.69 283 186<br />
2021-22 51804 52614 140865 118725 89061 66111 2.72 2.26 495 367<br />
Mean 50618 52262 117069 98338 66434 47076 2.30 1.71 369 262<br />
Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts<br />
908 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
The mean cost <strong>of</strong> cultivation is 50618 Rs/ha and 52262 Rs/ha for demo and check respectively.<br />
The mean gross returns are Rs.117069 and Rs. 98338 and net returns are Rs.66434 and Rs.<br />
47076 in the demo and check respectively. Similar findings were also reported by Oad et<br />
al.,2007 and reported that under rainfed conditions cotton + redgram intercropping system has<br />
shown positive combinations for better growth and yield contributing parameters and costbenefit<br />
ratio over the sole cotton crop. The mean benefit-cost ratio was 2.30: 1 and 1.71: 1 for<br />
the demo and check respectively. Krishnareddy et al., 2001 found that intercropping <strong>of</strong> cotton<br />
+ redgram was more beneficial than sole cropping <strong>of</strong> cotton in sense <strong>of</strong> monetary recoveries.<br />
The highest mean per day net returns were recorded as Rs 369/ha in the demo with the adoption<br />
<strong>of</strong> cotton+ redgram intercropping system over check Rs.262 /ha. Per day net returns value will<br />
depend on the net return and duration <strong>of</strong> the crops sown as intercrops and sole crops.<br />
References<br />
Blaise, D., Majumdar, G. and Tekale, K.U. 2005.On-farm evaluation <strong>of</strong> fertilizer application<br />
and conservation tillage on productivity <strong>of</strong> cotton+ pigeon pea strip intercropping on<br />
rainfed vertisols <strong>of</strong> central India. Soil Tillage Res., 84:108-117<br />
Krishna Reddy, S.V., Rao, M.U., Rao, R.S., Satyanarayana, S.V.V. and Krishna, S.K. 2001.<br />
Economic viability <strong>of</strong> various alternative crops in burley tobacco growing agency area<br />
<strong>of</strong> Andhra Pradesh. Tobacco Res., 27: 190-192<br />
Maitra, S. and Ray, D.P. 2019. Enrichment <strong>of</strong> biodiversity, influence in microbial population<br />
dynamics <strong>of</strong> soil and nutrient utilization in cereal-legume intercropping systems: A<br />
Review. Int J Biores Sci., 6(1): 11–19.<br />
Oad, F.C., Siddqui, M.H. and Buriro, U.A. 2007. Agronomic and economic interface between<br />
cotton Gossypium hirsutum L. and Pigeon Pea Cajanus cajan L. J. Agron. 6(1): 199-203<br />
T6-52P-1515<br />
Crop Diversification with Castor Crop for Maximizing Productivity and<br />
Pr<strong>of</strong>itability in Ananthapuramu District <strong>of</strong> Andhra Pradesh<br />
G. Sashikala 1 , B. Chandana 1 , B. K. Kishore Reddy 1 , V. Siva Jyothi 1 , M. Ravi Kishore 1 ,<br />
K. Naveen Kumar 1 , Malleswari Sadhineni 1 , J. V. Prasad 2 and J. V. N. S. Prasad 3<br />
1 ANGRAU- Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Reddipalli, Andhra Pradesh – 515 701<br />
2<br />
ICAR-ATARI, CRIDA campus, Hyderabad – 500 059<br />
3<br />
TDC-NICRA, ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad – 500 059<br />
Ananthapuramu is the southern-most district <strong>of</strong> the Rayalaseema region <strong>of</strong> Andhra Pradesh.<br />
Agriculture remains the most important economic activity <strong>of</strong> the district, it is characterized by<br />
909 | Page Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
high levels <strong>of</strong> instability and uncertainty. Being in the rain-shadow region <strong>of</strong> Andhra Pradesh,<br />
the district is drought-prone. Groundnut is the main crop with 7.5 lakh ha which is purely<br />
rainfed. During the recent years, the yields <strong>of</strong> groundnut crop has been reduced drastically or<br />
sometimes the crop fails due to severe drought. Hence, there is a need to introduce pr<strong>of</strong>itable<br />
and sustainable crops. Crop diversification can be practiced in dryland areas to reduce the risk<br />
factor <strong>of</strong> crop failures due to recurring droughts (Khanam et al. 2018). Castor can be grown as<br />
an alternative to groundnut. Being hardy crop, it can be grown under rainfed conditions and<br />
thrives well on a variety <strong>of</strong> soils and climatic conditions (Reddy and Suresh, 2008). It was<br />
therefore, felt worthwhile to adopt the castor as an alternate crop was carried out in the farmers’<br />
fields under National Innovations on Climate Resilient Agriculture (NICRA) project. Crop<br />
diversification in a participatory mode was demonstrated in the NICRA TDC adopted villages<br />
Peravali, Chamaluru and Chakrayapeta villages.<br />
Methodology<br />
NICRA adopted villages Chamaluru, Peravali and Chakrayapeta falls under Narpala and<br />
Singanamala mandals <strong>of</strong> Ananthapuramu district respectively. The normal rainfall <strong>of</strong> the area<br />
566.2 mm. The total cultivated area <strong>of</strong> Chamaluru, Peravali and Chakrayapeta is 2162 ha, 714<br />
ha and 104 ha, respectively. The major soil types are red soils (90%) and light black soils<br />
(10%). The major rainfed crops cultivated during Kharif are groundnut, redgram and jowar.<br />
The actual crop seasonal rainfall was 200 mm in 2018, 398 mm in 2019, 748 mm in 2020 and<br />
647 mm in 2021.<br />
The treatment comprised <strong>of</strong> short duration castor hybrids (DCH-519 & ICH-66) and farmers<br />
practice is groundnut (K-6). The demonstration was conducted in 20.5 ha involving 34 farmers<br />
from the adopted villages. Crop yield (kg/ha) and economics were recorded. All the costs were<br />
determined considering the prevailing charges <strong>of</strong> agricultural operations and the market price<br />
<strong>of</strong> the involved inputs. During studies, gross returns were obtained by translating the harvest<br />
into monetary terms at the prevalent market rate.<br />
Results<br />
A comparison <strong>of</strong> yield performance between castor and farmer’s practice (groundnut) is<br />
depicted in Table 1. It was observed that, during 2021-22, castor resulted higher pod yield<br />
(1150 kg/ha) as compared to groundnut plot (670 kg/ha) with 71.6 per cent yield increase over<br />
the groundnut. Similar results were obtained in 2018 to 2021 with castor. The castor plots<br />
recorded higher mean pod yield (817 kg/ha) as compared to groundnut (485 kg/ha) with 66 per<br />
cent average increase in yield over the farmer’s practice.<br />
The economics <strong>of</strong> castor production under crop diversification was presented in Table 2.<br />
During the four-year period higher average gross return was recorded with demonstration plots<br />
(29266 Rs/ha) as compared to groundnut (27711 Rs/ha). During 2021-22, improved technology<br />
Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts<br />
910 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
produced higher gross return (46000 Rs/ha) compared to farmer’s practice (46900 Rs/ha).<br />
Similar results were obtained during 2019-20 and 2020-21 where demonstration gave higher<br />
gross return in comparison to groundnut due to higher yield obtained. The benefit: cost ratio<br />
during 2021-22 was 1.95:1 in demonstrated plot as compared to farmers practice (1.50:1).<br />
Similarly, during 2018-19, 2019-20 and 2020-21 demonstration plots obtained higher B:C ratio<br />
i.e. 1.77:1, 1.67:1 and 1.53:1, respectively. Similarly, the average across years indicated that<br />
the demonstration plot gave higher (1.73:1) B:C ratio from farmer practices (1.12:1). The<br />
variability in benefit cost ratio throughout the three years can be attributed primarily to yield<br />
performance and cost <strong>of</strong> inputs in those specific years. However, favourable benefit-cost ratios<br />
showed the economic feasibility <strong>of</strong> the crop diversification and persuaded the farmers on the<br />
effectiveness <strong>of</strong> intervention. These results confirm with the results <strong>of</strong> Hegde et al. (2003) who<br />
reported the improved technology plots recorded higher mean productivity, gross returns, and<br />
B: C ratio than farmers practice plots indicating improved technology's technical and economic<br />
feasibility <strong>of</strong> castor.<br />
Conclusion<br />
The findings <strong>of</strong> the study revealed that crop diversification with castor was found efficient in<br />
productivity and pr<strong>of</strong>itability by recording significantly the highest yield with low pest and<br />
disease incidence.<br />
References<br />
Hegde, D.M., Prakash Tiwari, S. and Rai, M. 2003. Crop diversification in Indian Agriculture.<br />
Agricultural situation in India. 255-272.<br />
Khanam, R., Badhuri, D and Nayak, A.K. 2018. Crop diversification: A way out for doubling<br />
farmer’s income. Indian Farming. 68(01): 31-32.<br />
Reddy, B.N. and Suresh, G. 2008 Crop diversification with oilseeds for higher pr<strong>of</strong>itability.<br />
Souvenir. National Symposium on News Paradigms in Agronomic Research. Navsari<br />
Agricultural University, Navsari, November,19-21,2008. pp.33-37.<br />
Year<br />
Yield parameters <strong>of</strong> castor and groundnut under rainfed conditions<br />
Area<br />
(ha)<br />
No. <strong>of</strong><br />
farmers<br />
Variety<br />
Pod yield (kg/ha) % Increase<br />
over<br />
Castor Groundnut Groundnut<br />
2018-19 2.5 4 DCH-519 419 277 51.3<br />
2019-20 5 5 DCH-519 875 512 70.9<br />
2020-21 5 5 DCH-519 824 482 70.9<br />
2021-22 8 20 ICH-66 1150 670 71.6<br />
Total/Mean 20.5 34 817 485 66.2<br />
911 | Page Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Economics <strong>of</strong> crop diversification with castor under rainfed conditions<br />
Year<br />
Gross<br />
(Rs/ha)<br />
Returns<br />
Cost <strong>of</strong> cultivation<br />
(Rs/ha)<br />
Net Returns<br />
(Rs/ha)<br />
B:C ratio<br />
2018-<br />
19<br />
2019-<br />
20<br />
2020-<br />
21<br />
Castor Groundnut Castor Groundnut Castor Groundnut Castor Groundnut<br />
11750 16847 20800 26875 9050 -10388 1.77 0.61<br />
30625 24550 18350 28410 12275 3860 1.67 1.16<br />
28690 22550 18750 27510<br />
9940 5260 1.53 1.21<br />
2021-<br />
22<br />
46000 46900 23540 31250<br />
22460 15650 1.95 1.50<br />
Mean 29266 27711 20360 28511 13431 3595 1.73 1.12<br />
Institutional Interventions for Climatic Risk Management<br />
Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts<br />
T6-53P-1668<br />
K. Nagasree, J. V. N. S. Prasad, C. A. Rama Rao, Jagriti Rohit, Anshida Beevi,<br />
K. Ravi Shankar, B. M. K. Raju and M. Prabhakar<br />
Central Research Institute for Dryland agriculture.<br />
Farming communities in semiarid areas <strong>of</strong> India are more vulnerable to impacts <strong>of</strong> weather<br />
aberrations and scarcity <strong>of</strong> resources. It is well evident that Climate change disproportionately<br />
affects the people occupying the lowest economic strata <strong>of</strong> the society having least capacity to<br />
respond and adapt to such rapid environmental change but are historically the least responsible<br />
for its causes. Untimely and uncertain extreme weather events create adverse impacts affecting<br />
crop yield parameters, losses to village level resources and infrastructure particularly rural<br />
communities in climatically vulnerable areas. The capacity <strong>of</strong> farmers to cope with such<br />
different forms <strong>of</strong> risk will become ever more crucial, and extension efforts must pay special<br />
attention to educating farmers about their options to enhance resilience and response capacity<br />
(IPCC, 2007).<br />
Accurate climate information on climate resilient technologies and the ability to interpret it<br />
allow farmers to plan and make better decisions on how to adapt to climate change. Livelihood<br />
support includes strengthening community organization, natural resource management, income<br />
generation, access to markets and living conditions, combined with building capacity to<br />
analyze hazards and stresses and improved early warning and contingency planning. This is<br />
further adapted for climate change by improving people’s ability to deal with uncertainty by<br />
promoting knowledge, access to information and support for learning and experimentation<br />
912 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
(Pasteur, 2009). Literature highlights that the success <strong>of</strong> these adaptation efforts generally<br />
hinges upon the nature <strong>of</strong> existing formal and informal rural institutions. Mubaya et al, 2017<br />
reported that significant efforts have been made to understand impacts and how communities<br />
adapt to climate change impacts, yet there is an urgent need to interrogate the capacity <strong>of</strong><br />
institutions and institutional arrangements in local level adaptation processes. Hence improving<br />
climate resilience among rural households in various agricultural systems requires the<br />
collective action at grassroots level as a localized solution to tackle vagaries <strong>of</strong> climate<br />
extremes.<br />
It is in this backdrop; suitable strategies are deployed for adaptation and resilience to climate<br />
change at grassroots level and to enhance coping ability <strong>of</strong> farming communities under the<br />
technology demonstration component <strong>of</strong> NICRA project implemented by ICAR-CRIDA.<br />
Social interventions like creation <strong>of</strong> VCRMC, Village Climatic risk Management committee at<br />
the NICRA villages <strong>of</strong> KVK are envisaged to have inclusive approach for facilitating<br />
community participation, capacity improvement to take up climate adaptation plans.<br />
Objectives<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Accordingly, the study to analyze the Institutional processes has taken up with the<br />
following objectives.<br />
To analyze the VCRMCS structure and composition across the NICRA- technology<br />
demonstration component villages<br />
To delineate the functional processes <strong>of</strong> VCRMCs operation across ATARIs.<br />
Results<br />
VCRMC is intended to promote community’s partnership accountability and responsibility for<br />
the climate resilient technologies showcased at the field level. It would lead to the enhanced<br />
flexibility, transparency and enabling mechanisms for dissemination <strong>of</strong> the climate resilient<br />
technologies among rural communities. Khan et al, 2020 stated that CBOs play important role<br />
in reducing the negative impacts <strong>of</strong> climate change by enhancing the adoption <strong>of</strong> adaptation<br />
strategies. It is also evident from the study the need <strong>of</strong> further strengthening and<br />
institutionalizing the informal farmers’ groups and institutions for the successful adaptation.<br />
913 | Page Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Details <strong>of</strong> ATARI zone wise KVKs and VCRMC members (Till 2020.)<br />
S.No. ZONE ATARI No. <strong>of</strong> KVKs No. <strong>of</strong> villages VCRMC Members<br />
1 ZONE I LUDHIANA 13 62 1318<br />
2 ZONE II JODHPUR 7 24 1264<br />
3 ZONE III KANPUR 13 35 1224<br />
4 ZONE IV PATNA 13 51 1487<br />
5 ZONE V KOLKATA 9 31 1134<br />
6 ZONE VI GUWAHATI 9 27 870<br />
7 ZONE VII BARAPANI 14 41 1216<br />
8 ZONE VIII PUNE 13 43 3080<br />
9 ZONE IX JABALPUR 12 29 1939<br />
10 ZONE X HYDERABAD 11 38 973<br />
11 ZONE XI BENGALURU 7 16 794<br />
121 397 15299<br />
The experiences <strong>of</strong> VCRMC functioning reveals the potential <strong>of</strong> grassroot partnerships and<br />
linkages in leveraging the adaptive capacity and overall community resilience. Brown et al<br />
2015 mentioned the linkage <strong>of</strong> households with local informal institutions fosters social<br />
learning, which builds adaptive capacity. The linkage <strong>of</strong> these institutions with other formal<br />
local and external institutions facilitates exchange <strong>of</strong> knowledge and resources that can foster<br />
resilience. The institutional setup in NICRA villages is unique in the way that they are custom<br />
tailored to the needs and priorities <strong>of</strong> rural stakeholders addressing location specific problems<br />
in various agro eco regions <strong>of</strong> the country.<br />
Conclusion<br />
The study results reveal that the presence <strong>of</strong> exclusively functioning institutions like VCRMC<br />
with an aim <strong>of</strong> climate resilience, equip rural communities to respond better for unexpected<br />
climate shocks and induced climate awareness with access to timely climate advisory services.<br />
References<br />
Agrawal, A., Sweeney., C.M.C. and Perrin, N. 2008. Local Institutions and Climate Change<br />
Adaptation. The social dimensions <strong>of</strong> climate change. Social development notes.<br />
Community driven development.<br />
Brown., H. C. P and. Sonwa, D. J. 2015. Rural local institutions and climate change adaptation<br />
in forest communities in Cameroon. Ecology and Society, 20(2):6<br />
Jonatan A. Lassa, 2019. Negotiating Institutional Pathways for Sustaining Climate Change<br />
Resilience and Risk Governance in Indonesia. Climate 2019, 7, 95.<br />
Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts<br />
914 | Page
International Conference on Reimagining Rainfed Agro-ecosystems: Challenges &<br />
Opportunities during 22-24, December 2022 at ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad<br />
Climate Change. 2001: The Scientific Basis. Contribution <strong>of</strong> Working Group I to the Third<br />
Assessment Report <strong>of</strong> the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Houghton, J.T.,<br />
et al. (eds)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York,<br />
NY, USA, 881 pp.<br />
IPCC. 2007. Climate Change 2007. Synthesis Report. Contribution <strong>of</strong> Working Groups I, II &<br />
III to the Fourth Assessment Report <strong>of</strong> the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.<br />
Geneva<br />
Khan N.A., Gao, Q & Abid, M.2020. Public institutions’ capacities regarding climate change<br />
adaptation and risk management support in agriculture: the case <strong>of</strong> Punjab province,<br />
Pakistan. Scientific Reports. (2020) 10:14111. Mubaya, C.P and Mafongoya , P. 2017.<br />
The role <strong>of</strong> institutions in managing local level climate change adaptation in semiarid<br />
Zimbabwe. Climate risk management. 16(2017):93-105.<br />
915 | Page Institutional and policy innovations for accelerated and enhanced impacts