19.12.2022 Views

2022 Year in Review

The Year in Review is YDS’ biggest and most exciting publication of the year - featuring analysis that covers the most significant and impactful events that have shaped our world. The 2022 Year in Review explores key events in all regions, from the overturning of Roe v Wade, the war in Ukraine, and the UK leadership crisis, this year’s edition is not one to miss! Read it now !

The Year in Review is YDS’ biggest and most exciting publication of the year - featuring analysis that covers the most significant and impactful events that have shaped our world.

The 2022 Year in Review explores key events in all regions, from the overturning of Roe v Wade, the war in Ukraine, and the UK leadership crisis, this year’s edition is not one to miss!

Read it now !

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The role of the US and the EU in promoting

human rights in SSA is vexed, and the

advocacy of LGBTQ+ rights is no exception.

Since 2010, Western nations have used the

threat of aid withdrawal, and rhetorical

condemnations to overturn homophobic

legal decisions.

Although no doubt a noble idea, the

effectiveness of Western attempts to

pressure and coerce homophobic African

countries to amend laws and protect gay

rights often fails to consider the colonial

overtones, especially the role of colonial

legal codes in the outlawing of homosexual

relations.

It has become increasingly common for

Western countries to promote LGBTQ+

rights in non-Western countries. In 2011,

the Obama administration announced that

the USA would promote gay rights through

diplomatic means throughout the world,

stating that ‘gay rights are human rights

and human rights are gay rights’.

These methods involved two main

practices in the African context: diplomatic

denunciation and shaming from Western

nations, and the threat or actual

withdrawal of aid.

Criticism of homophobic African legislation

is common, and can lead to diplomatic

rows: in 2019, the US ambassador to

Zambia was recalled after criticising the

jailing of a homosexual couple.

However, the threat of withdrawing aid is

presumed to be more impactful, given the

reliance of many Sub-Saharan African

states on foreign aid. In the early 2010s,

Britain and America threatened the

withdrawal of aid in response to

homophobic legislation in Malawi, Ghana

and Uganda.

However, these threats were unsuccessful

and counterproductive. In Malawi, there

was a severe backlash against members of

the LGBTQ+ community, for the perception

that they were responsible for the decline

in aid.

The colonial legacy greatly impacts the

perception of Western LGBTQ+ rights

advocacy. When homosexuality is viewed

as an inherently ‘un-African’ behaviour that

was imported from the West, Western

support for LGTBQ+ rights becomes

perceived as a threat that undermines the

creation of a strong and unified African

identity.

The perception that the West is attempting

to coerce African nations into adopting

policies that undermine Africa is especially

potent for populist leaders looking to

cement power. This was Ugandan

president Yoweri Museveni’s strategy when

Western nations cut aid in 2014. The threat

of outside political interference from

powerful Western countries can be

leveraged and used to reinforce

homophobic attitudes.

P A G E 1 7 0

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!