Theory of Knowledge - Course Companion for Students Marija Uzunova Dang Arvin Singh Uzunov Dang

ayodelepearce1
from ayodelepearce1 More from this publisher
21.11.2022 Views

with Cambridge Analytica and leftassociationUniversity for Stanford in 2014.Cambridgeplays a significant role inTechnologyour senses and making more of theaugmentingknowable. It can bring very small or veryworldobjects into visibility, make very fast orlargeslow processes perceptible, reveal invisibleveryand render complex phenomenarelationsIn extending our cognitive abilities,intelligible.enlarges what we can know andtechnologydoes it mean to be at the frontier ofWhatWe have drills that bore 100 floorsknowledge?into polar ice to extract ice cores thatdownclimate data from a time long beforecontainthis, in the 2013 study, Kosinski’s teamBeforeissued the following warning.hadof the ocean, and yet less is knownbottomthe Earth’s seabed than about the surfaceaboutMars. Computers are generating proofs ofofunsolved problems of mathematics,complexof which are beyond our human capacitysomeverify. Digital and multimedia art opentoavenues of expression, with unclearnewand implications. We have modelslimitationscomplex systems, fed by big data andofby AI algorithms, producing outcomesenginedpredictions that influence decisions withandhumanconsequences.pushes the frontier of our knowledgeTechnologythe same time as it expands the set of knownatAt the beginning of this chapter weunknowns.you to consider whether knowledgeinvitedcan be produced without the use oftodayIf so, what new questions abouttechnology.terms: BoumanSearchof black holepicturedo you take an image of an objectHowappears to us on Earth as small as anthatIII. Methods and toolsIII. Methods and toolsPredictability of individual attributes from digital records of behavior may have considerable negativeimplications, because it can easily be applied to large numbers of people without obtaining their individualconsent and without them noticing. Commercial companies, governmental institutions, or even one’s Facebookfriends could use software to infer attributes such as intelligence, sexual orientation, or political views thatan individual may not have intended to share. One can imagine situations in which such predictions, even ifincorrect, could pose a threat to an individual’s well-being, freedom, or even life.(Matz et al 2017)Making connectionsTechnopoliticsChapter 2, section IV, considers the political implicationsof this research.III.3 Technology at the frontier ofknowledgeverification, validity and reliability arise?transforms how we can know it.For discussionMaking connectionsTechnological toolkitsHow to take a picture of a black holeConsider the dierent areas of knowledge. Howwith Katie Boumanis technology changing the methods and toolsavailable for the production of knowledge?TEDTalkorange on the surface of the moon? Whathumans. We have powerful sonar to map the75

that object is a black hole, from whichifparticle can escape, not even the lightnoto take an image of it? This was thenecessarychallenge confronting scientiststechnologicalgave us the first image of a black hole,who2019. How did they overcome it? Just overinyears before their breakthrough, Katietwospoke at a TEDx event. Watch theBoumanto find out how Bouman and team builtvideoimpossibly large telescope to photographanelusive and never-before-seen object. Thenanthese questions.considerHow did the team protect against their1.bias?potentialWhat gave them confidence that their2.were reliable?resultsChapter 7 we discuss the phenomenon ofInregress, which deals with theexperimenter’sof providing experimental evidencechallengephenomena that have only been theorizedfornever observed. How can we know that thebutone gets from technological tools andresultsreect a real phenomenon, if we haveinstrumentsobserved that phenomenon before and haveneverhas kept company with death ever sincePhotographywere invented, in 1839. Because an imagecameraswith a camera is, literally, a trace of somethingproducedbefore the lens, photographs had an advantagebroughtany painting as a memento of the vanished pastoverthe dear departed. To seize death in the making wasandmatter: the camera’s reach remained limited asanotheras it had to be lugged about, set down, steadied.longonce the camera was emancipated from the tripod,But,portable, and equipped with a range nder and atrulyof lenses that permitted unprecedented featsvarietyclose observation from a distant vantage point,ofacquired an immediacy and authoritypicture-takingthan any verbal account in conveying the horrorgreatermass-produced death. If there was one year whenofpower of photographs to dene, not merely record,thecamera is an example of how a newThechanged the way that knowledge istechnologyin varied fields, from science, to art toproducedIn “Looking at War” Susan Sontagjournalism.about how photography achieves both awritesof objectivity as well as perspective, and asenseand immediacy that far exceeds anylegitimacyaccounts of war.previousterms: Sontag LookingSearchWar New Yorkeratare some continuities, but also veryTheredifferences, between the visual languagemanySontag’s time and the visual language ofofConsider, for example, the claim thattoday.relationship between image-making andthehas shifted away from representing realitytruthmost abominable realities trumped all the complexthesurely it was 1945, with the pictures taken innarratives,and early May in Bergen-Belsen, Buchenwald, andAprilin the rst days after the camps were liberated,Dachau,those taken by Japanese witnesses such as Yosukeandin the days following the incineration of theYamahatahad the advantage of uniting twoPhotographsfeatures. Their credentials of objectivitycontradictoryinbuilt, yet they always had, necessarily, a point ofwereThey were a record of the real—incontrovertible, asview.verbal account, however impartial, could be (assumingnothey showed what they purported to show)—since athatwas doing the recording. And they bore witnessmachinethe real, since a person had been there to take them.to3III. Methods and toolsFigure 3.10 Varroa destructor (mite) on the back of Apis mellifera(honeybee)Making connectionsTechnology and the experimenter’s regressnothing to compare with?towards altering and creating different realities.Looking at Warpopulations of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, in early August.(Sontag 2002)76

that object is a black hole, from which

if

particle can escape, not even the light

no

to take an image of it? This was the

necessary

challenge confronting scientists

technological

gave us the first image of a black hole,

who

2019. How did they overcome it? Just over

in

years before their breakthrough, Katie

two

spoke at a TEDx event. Watch the

Bouman

to find out how Bouman and team built

video

impossibly large telescope to photograph

an

elusive and never-before-seen object. Then

an

these questions.

consider

How did the team protect against their

1.

bias?

potential

What gave them confidence that their

2.

were reliable?

results

Chapter 7 we discuss the phenomenon of

In

regress, which deals with the

experimenter’s

of providing experimental evidence

challenge

phenomena that have only been theorized

for

never observed. How can we know that the

but

one gets from technological tools and

results

reect a real phenomenon, if we have

instruments

observed that phenomenon before and have

never

has kept company with death ever since

Photography

were invented, in 1839. Because an image

cameras

with a camera is, literally, a trace of something

produced

before the lens, photographs had an advantage

brought

any painting as a memento of the vanished past

over

the dear departed. To seize death in the making was

and

matter: the camera’s reach remained limited as

another

as it had to be lugged about, set down, steadied.

long

once the camera was emancipated from the tripod,

But,

portable, and equipped with a range nder and a

truly

of lenses that permitted unprecedented feats

variety

close observation from a distant vantage point,

of

acquired an immediacy and authority

picture-taking

than any verbal account in conveying the horror

greater

mass-produced death. If there was one year when

of

power of photographs to dene, not merely record,

the

camera is an example of how a new

The

changed the way that knowledge is

technology

in varied fields, from science, to art to

produced

In “Looking at War” Susan Sontag

journalism.

about how photography achieves both a

writes

of objectivity as well as perspective, and a

sense

and immediacy that far exceeds any

legitimacy

accounts of war.

previous

terms: Sontag Looking

Search

War New Yorker

at

are some continuities, but also very

There

differences, between the visual language

many

Sontag’s time and the visual language of

of

Consider, for example, the claim that

today.

relationship between image-making and

the

has shifted away from representing reality

truth

most abominable realities trumped all the complex

the

surely it was 1945, with the pictures taken in

narratives,

and early May in Bergen-Belsen, Buchenwald, and

April

in the rst days after the camps were liberated,

Dachau,

those taken by Japanese witnesses such as Yosuke

and

in the days following the incineration of the

Yamahata

had the advantage of uniting two

Photographs

features. Their credentials of objectivity

contradictory

inbuilt, yet they always had, necessarily, a point of

were

They were a record of the real—incontrovertible, as

view.

verbal account, however impartial, could be (assuming

no

they showed what they purported to show)—since a

that

was doing the recording. And they bore witness

machine

the real, since a person had been there to take them.

to

3III. Methods and tools

Figure 3.10 Varroa destructor (mite) on the back of Apis mellifera

(honeybee)

Making connections

Technology and the experimenter’s regress

nothing to compare with?

towards altering and creating different realities.

Looking at War

populations of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, in early August.

(Sontag 2002)

76

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!