Theory of Knowledge - Course Companion for Students Marija Uzunova Dang Arvin Singh Uzunov Dang
understanding and textbookinternational257–61revisionthe past by the standards of thejudging276–7presenthistory and thresholds of signicancemaking254–7natural laws to human behaviourapplying212in the human sciencesexperimentation235–7to growth and limits of humanlimits243–5knowledgeand objectivity in eldwork andneutralitymethods 229–30ethnographicare the humans in human sciences?who222–4knowledge as local, holistic andindigenous114–15dynamicecological knowledge (TEK)traditional127–32do we know what we know abouthow101–3language?and the other-than-human worldlanguage106–8conversant in the language of thebecoming322–4universeSimpson and Fermat’s last theoremHomer346should mathematics be taught andhow342–3communicated?what ways can mathematics be known?in344–5and the mathematical communityindividuals327–30mathematics universal or culture-bound?is330–4pure mathematics ethically neutral?is348–50for numbers in the brain and inlooking332–4culturemathematics discovered or invented?was325–6coming to know 120–1history of history 267–9conservation 121Inca writings 90–1education for all 116–120Indigenous Peoples 124–7ethics and politics of representation 133–5just language 109–10literacy and discovery 248–51language and colonization 99–100perspectives 116perspectives 251–3research as a relational activity 123–4language, emotion and truth 108–9role of language 124–7should history “be” something? 274–5limitless language 88–92study of the past 247–8songlines 115–16linguistics and epistemic diversity 93–6using history to predict the future 270–2neuroscience 102–3what remains of the past? 261–7problems with translation 104–5uncontacted peoples 136–7HIV 178–80who and what is indigenous? 112–13religious knowledge and language 154Hobbes, Thomas 23role of metaphor 92–3intellectual entitlement 18Hobson-Jobson 99intellectual humility 9–10liberation theology 164human sciences 206–9lies 32–5interpretation 15limits of knowledge 243–5limits to growth 243–5Jdestigmatizing loss of condence 239–40ethics 240–3literacy 248–51justication 15MKheroines and heretics 218–19knowledge 1–3mathematics 321–3implications of WEIRD research 224–9beauty 341–2appeals to authority 9is good parenting universal? 225–7category of problematic beliefs 19concepts 15–16diversity and many mathematics 334–6epistemic diversity and epistemic justice 20–1mathiness and physics envy 209–11doing impossible mathematics 345–7ethics 18myth of barter 220–1ethics 347–8“here be dragons” 5–6how we run away from facts 12–13perspectives 213–16impact of ignorance 6–7politics and science of pain 213–15intellectual entitlement 18intellectual humility 9–10replicability and reproducibility 237–9knowledge matters 7–8simplicity and accuracy 220–2knowledge, or knowledges? 3–4trouble with normality 216–18perspectives 8–9what we measure matters 231–5thinking patterns and habits 13–15varying our metaphors of knowledge 16–17why do people believe strange things? 10–12Iyour intellectual autobiography 17–18IB assessment 356mathematical uency 343mathematical indivisibles 328–3essay 369–76exhibition 357–68mathematical proof 337–8Lmathematical proof in the digital age 339knowledge questions 356–7Ladakh, India 117–18ignorance 6–7non-surveyable proof 339–40language 87–8professional standards 353–5Inca writings 90–1babies and foetuses 109indigenization 119trouble with statistics 350–3deaf culture and signed languages 100–1Indigenous Peoples 111–12dialects 94–5Ainu of Japan 113–14English as the global lingua franca 96–9appreciation or appropriation 135–6mathiness 209–11377
otherwise by measuring differentlyknowing233–5disasters and explanations in religiousnatural160–1knowledgepure mathematics ethically neutral?is348–50the past by the standards of thejudging276–7presentpolitics with psychographicdisrupting52–7technologyand Boyle on knowledge, power andHobbes23 faithpower and the politics of knowledgereligion,152and transferring knowledge inacquiring153–4religionpower and the politics of knowledgereligion,152education for tolerance and mutualreligious162understandingthe sharing of scienticdemocratizing182knowledgein the application of scienticethics203–4knowledgeand the articial in experimentsnatural195–6emergence and complexityreductionism,199–201and responsibilities of scientic journalsrole180statistics and the “prosecutor’s fallacy”faulty351–3secular Buddhism 141–2physics envy 210–11measuring 231–3spiritual and political 142–3pigment feuds 310–11touchpoints and tensions 141pluralism 50–2Mendel, Gregor 186–7what is and is not religion? 139–41politics 22–3, 43–6metaphors 92–3women and religion 149–52campus politics 50–2microtargeting 56–7repatriation of artworks 299–300danger of fair and balanced 37–8Mitchell, Joseph 45–6what is cultural property? 300–1digital subcultures 46–50morality 163–4replicability 237–9museums 302–4reproducibility 237–9do artefacts have politics? 78–80responsibility 16do lies spread faster than truth? 32–5Nresponsibilities of scientic journals 180nature 155–8echo chambers and lter bubbles 39–43responsibilities of technologists 81–2battle of religious conservationists 159expert knowledge and governance 28–9restitutive history 274Neptune 173–4Simpact of behavioural microtargeting 56–7science 167–9, 193neuroscience 102–3is everything political? 24–7is there a post-truth public sphere? 31–2neutrality 35–7cost-benet analysis 204–5Overton window 29–30eldwork and ethnographic methods 229–30politics and science of pain 213–15disagreement in the public eye 189religion 142–3neutrinos 175disseminating scientic knowledge 181–5ethics 202Newton’s laws of gravity 173–5no-platforming 50–2ethics in scientic methodology 202–3representing Indigenous Peoples 133–5truth, neutrality and false balance 35–7non-violent moral protest 166post-colonial critiques 192–3normality 216–18falsicationism 168power 15, 23, 152feminist and post-colonial critiques 190–3is knowledge power? 170–1Ois knowledge power? 170–1objectivity 16power of art to inuence ethics 312–15Mendel in the textbook 186–7psychographic technology 52–7eldwork and ethnographic methods 229–30science 198–9psychometrics 72–5observation 194objectivity 198–9observation and experimentation 194–5scientic observation as method 196–7Rwhat is observable? 195reductionism 200–1Overton window 29–30religion 138–9, 161science as golem 205Pdoes religion seek truth? 146–7science communication 183pain 213–15engaging with religious multiplicity 145–6science for citizenship 188–90parenting 225–7liberation theology 164scientic consensus and disagreement 177–81past 247–8, 261–7morality and religion 163censorship of the past 316scientic observation as method 196–7multiple perspectives 147–8students of science 185religion and nature 155–61two historical perspectives on science 171–6religion and science 144–5patta-nikkujjana-kamma 166signed languages 100–1Pauli, Wolfgang 175religion and violence 164–6simplicity 220–2perspectives 8–9social networks 72–5human sciences 213–16songlines 115–16Indigenous Peoples 116statistics 350–1religion 147–8religious knowledge and language 154secular alternatives to religious ethics 163–4science 171–6378
- Page 333 and 334: II. Perspectivesof mathmatial knowl
- Page 335 and 336: II. Perspectivesonpts an appar so s
- Page 337 and 338: II. Perspectivesdid th st minds of
- Page 339 and 340: II. Perspectiveswrits that long for
- Page 341 and 342: II. Perspectivesognitiv nurosintist
- Page 343 and 344: II. Perspectivesprptuat inquality o
- Page 345 and 346: III. Methods and toolsonsidr two on
- Page 347 and 348: III. Methods and toolsproofs wr rit
- Page 349 and 350: III. Methods and tools10 features a
- Page 351 and 352: III. Methods and toolsmathmatis is
- Page 353 and 354: III. Methods and toolswritrs of The
- Page 355 and 356: IV. Ethicsthat “I hav nvr don any
- Page 357 and 358: IV. Ethicsold adag, widly itd and o
- Page 359 and 360: IV. Ethicswll-puliisd figur of 1 in
- Page 361 and 362: IV. EthicsMathematics. Th artil prs
- Page 363 and 364: I. THE EXHIBITIONquestions are ques
- Page 365 and 366: I. THE EXHIBITION11. Can new knowle
- Page 367 and 368: I. THE EXHIBITIONa new subject can
- Page 369 and 370: I. THE EXHIBITIONthat objects do no
- Page 371 and 372: I. THE EXHIBITIONyou describe them,
- Page 373 and 374: I. THE EXHIBITIONdoubt, and a tweet
- Page 375 and 376: II. THE ESSAYother way you demonstr
- Page 377 and 378: II. THE ESSAYwhat extent do the con
- Page 379 and 380: II. THE ESSAYAnother weak approach
- Page 381 and 382: II. THE ESSAYto present the conclus
- Page 383: as unspoken and unspeakable truthsa
- Page 387 and 388: J. 2017. “The Triage of Truth: Do
- Page 389 and 390: H. 2017. “Cambridge Analytica, Tr
- Page 391 and 392: Human Rights and Equal Opportunitie
- Page 393 and 394: K. 2006b. “Leila Ahmed Muslim Wom
- Page 395 and 396: HSD, Freeman, C, Jahoda, M, Pavitt,
- Page 397 and 398: W. 2012. “Ethics and Historical R
- Page 399 and 400: PJ, Hammel, EA and O’Connell, JW.
- Page 401 and 402: Campbell and Justin Friesen: ‘Why
otherwise by measuring differently
knowing
233–5
disasters and explanations in religious
natural
160–1
knowledge
pure mathematics ethically neutral?
is
348–50
the past by the standards of the
judging
276–7
present
politics with psychographic
disrupting
52–7
technology
and Boyle on knowledge, power and
Hobbes
23 faith
power and the politics of knowledge
religion,
152
and transferring knowledge in
acquiring
153–4
religion
power and the politics of knowledge
religion,
152
education for tolerance and mutual
religious
162
understanding
the sharing of scientic
democratizing
182
knowledge
in the application of scientic
ethics
203–4
knowledge
and the articial in experiments
natural
195–6
emergence and complexity
reductionism,
199–201
and responsibilities of scientic journals
role
180
statistics and the “prosecutor’s fallacy”
faulty
351–3
secular Buddhism 141–2
physics envy 210–11
measuring 231–3
spiritual and political 142–3
pigment feuds 310–11
touchpoints and tensions 141
pluralism 50–2
Mendel, Gregor 186–7
what is and is not religion? 139–41
politics 22–3, 43–6
metaphors 92–3
women and religion 149–52
campus politics 50–2
microtargeting 56–7
repatriation of artworks 299–300
danger of fair and balanced 37–8
Mitchell, Joseph 45–6
what is cultural property? 300–1
digital subcultures 46–50
morality 163–4
replicability 237–9
museums 302–4
reproducibility 237–9
do artefacts have politics? 78–80
responsibility 16
do lies spread faster than truth? 32–5
N
responsibilities of scientic journals 180
nature 155–8
echo chambers and lter bubbles 39–43
responsibilities of technologists 81–2
battle of religious conservationists 159
expert knowledge and governance 28–9
restitutive history 274
Neptune 173–4
S
impact of behavioural microtargeting 56–7
science 167–9, 193
neuroscience 102–3
is everything political? 24–7
is there a post-truth public sphere? 31–2
neutrality 35–7
cost-benet analysis 204–5
Overton window 29–30
eldwork and ethnographic methods 229–30
politics and science of pain 213–15
disagreement in the public eye 189
religion 142–3
neutrinos 175
disseminating scientic knowledge 181–5
ethics 202
Newton’s laws of gravity 173–5
no-platforming 50–2
ethics in scientic methodology 202–3
representing Indigenous Peoples 133–5
truth, neutrality and false balance 35–7
non-violent moral protest 166
post-colonial critiques 192–3
normality 216–18
falsicationism 168
power 15, 23, 152
feminist and post-colonial critiques 190–3
is knowledge power? 170–1
O
is knowledge power? 170–1
objectivity 16
power of art to inuence ethics 312–15
Mendel in the textbook 186–7
psychographic technology 52–7
eldwork and ethnographic methods 229–30
science 198–9
psychometrics 72–5
observation 194
objectivity 198–9
observation and experimentation 194–5
scientic observation as method 196–7
R
what is observable? 195
reductionism 200–1
Overton window 29–30
religion 138–9, 161
science as golem 205
P
does religion seek truth? 146–7
science communication 183
pain 213–15
engaging with religious multiplicity 145–6
science for citizenship 188–90
parenting 225–7
liberation theology 164
scientic consensus and disagreement 177–81
past 247–8, 261–7
morality and religion 163
censorship of the past 316
scientic observation as method 196–7
multiple perspectives 147–8
students of science 185
religion and nature 155–61
two historical perspectives on science 171–6
religion and science 144–5
patta-nikkujjana-kamma 166
signed languages 100–1
Pauli, Wolfgang 175
religion and violence 164–6
simplicity 220–2
perspectives 8–9
social networks 72–5
human sciences 213–16
songlines 115–16
Indigenous Peoples 116
statistics 350–1
religion 147–8
religious knowledge and language 154
secular alternatives to religious ethics 163–4
science 171–6
378
Change language