Theory of Knowledge - Course Companion for Students Marija Uzunova Dang Arvin Singh Uzunov Dang

ayodelepearce1
from ayodelepearce1 More from this publisher
21.11.2022 Views

vidn for this unrasonal, vnAsfftivnss of mathmatis,miraulous,hav givn xampls of astratphilosophrsthat somhow om usful inonjtursappliations. For xampl, omplxral-worldwr long onsidrd to irrlvantnumrsrmovd from matrial rality, ut now smandto quantum mhanis.nssarylaw of gravitation is anothr xampl;Thonivd to xplain falling odisoriginallyEarth, it was xtndd on th asis of “vryonosrvations” to dsri th motionsantyplants, whr it “provd aurat yondofrasonal xptations” (Wignr 1960).allth 1970s dvlopmnts in ryptographyInyou might know as th mathmatis(whihWhatsApp nryption thnology andhinddrw on numr thory, andryptourrnis)fundamntal thorm of arithmti, whihthn onsidrd for 200 yars to amonghad“purst” of pur mathmatis for havingthral world valu. Suh xampls onrnnojust mathmatis’ fftivnss, ut also thnottwn dfining what is applid andtnsionis astrat mathmatis. On th on hand,whatHardy has said that pur mathmatis isG.H.usful than applid”, aus it trains“morthniqu so wll (Hardy 1940).mathmatialth othr hand, w hav Loahvsky’sOnthat thr is no suh thing asargumntmathmatis, aus all mathmatis“astrat”somday applid to th ral worldwillwll-known ritiqu of Wignr’s argumnt,Amathmatiian Rihard Hamming (1980),yfour “partial xplanations” to arguprovidsth fftivnss of mathmatis in ththatsins is nithr miraulous nornaturalunrasonal.We see what we look for: “muh of what w•oms from th glasss w put on” wrotsWe create the kind of mathematics•look for: for xampl, in fforts towephysial fors, physiistsundrstandtrid salars, thn vtors, and finallyfirsttnsors. And Nwton's thory ofinvntdwas rplad y th nwr, ttrgravityof gnral rlativity. Instad of amodlfftivnss, w s hr trialmiraulousMathematics and natural science address•a part of human existence, answeringonlyfew problems: this,comparativelyand politial philosophy, forasthtisar rtainly not fftivlyxampl,y mathmatis. Chaptr 8xplaindhow mathmatis may hav nxplorstoo far in th human sins.taknEvolution has primed humans to think•our mathmatial ailitymathematically:not a oinidn, w hav survivdisof it. This argumnt is on ofausI. ScopeI. Scope(Loahvsky quotd in dPillis 2002).(1980). Th xampls w find arisHammingth mathmatial tools usd, in a slf-fromrfrntial logi.Statu of Galilo Galili in Florn, ItalyFigure 11.1and rror.survival ias.323

I. Scopeof th arly xampls of this “unrasonalMostwr appliations of mathmatisfftivnss”physis. As th mathmatiian Isral Glfandinaov, it would misguidd to laim thatquipshas n miraulously fftiv inmathmatissins. That said, Glfand am on ofothrpionrs of iomathmatis. Towards th ndthth 20th ntury iologists wr systmatiallyofxtnsivly applying omplx mathmatisanda varity of filds. If you hav th intrst, doinrsarh on stohasti modlling of nzymsomswarm intllign and spatialdynamis,If mathmatis is th languag in whih1.xprsss itslf, is it ttrnaturas a mthod in th naturaldsridrathr than a ody of knowldgsins2. Whn onsidring knowing mathmatis:What vidn suggsts thr is mor(a)mathmatis than mthod?toIs knowing mathmatis knowing(b)to prform mathmatialhowor is thr mor to thisalulations,of knowldg?odyfar, our disussion has ntrtaind thThusthat mathmatis is th languagpossiilityth univrs; and that through it w gainofinto th strutur of th univrs. Thinsightsto this laim, suggstd y Hammingountrothrs, is that mathmatis is only our wayanddsriing and undrstanding th univrs,ofthr is nothing inhrntly mathmatialthatth univrs, or univrsal aoutaoutmathmatis.physiist Drk Aott (2013) hasThthat th supposd "unrasonalsuggstdof mathmatis is an illusionfftivnss"y human timsals; that w livinflunddi so quikly that th univrs appars toandgovrnd y mathmatial laws ut may notdisours aout mathmatis’ “unrasonalThisraiss two rlatd qustions:fftivnss”mathmatis is disovrd or invntd,whthrwhthr a numrial sns is iologiallyandthis xris to not your intuitionsUsmathmatis. Writ an nding toaoutfollowing sntn: “Mathmatialthis diffrnt from othr typs ofknowldgyou do this xris as a lass, olltIfompltd sntns andvryon’sth rang of viws and lifs. Thndisussth sntns into sts of laims andorganiz11There is only one thing which is more unreasonablethan the unreasonable eectiveness of mathematicsin physics, and this is the unreasonableineectiveness of mathematics in biology.(Gelfand quoted in Borovik 2018)Mathematics is biology’s next microscope, onlybetter; biology is mathematics’ next physics,only better.(Cohen 2004)atually so.vrsus ulturally ndowd.Practising skills: Constructingknowledge claimsmodlling of nural ntworks.For discussionWhat is mathematics about?knowldg in that ….”in itslf—and why?ountrlaims.324

vidn for this unrasonal, vn

As

fftivnss of mathmatis,

miraulous,

hav givn xampls of astrat

philosophrs

that somhow om usful in

onjturs

appliations. For xampl, omplx

ral-world

wr long onsidrd to irrlvant

numrs

rmovd from matrial rality, ut now sm

and

to quantum mhanis.

nssary

law of gravitation is anothr xampl;

Th

onivd to xplain falling odis

originally

Earth, it was xtndd on th asis of “vry

on

osrvations” to dsri th motion

santy

plants, whr it “provd aurat yond

of

rasonal xptations” (Wignr 1960).

all

th 1970s dvlopmnts in ryptography

In

you might know as th mathmatis

(whih

WhatsApp nryption thnology and

hind

drw on numr thory, and

ryptourrnis)

fundamntal thorm of arithmti, whih

th

n onsidrd for 200 yars to among

had

“purst” of pur mathmatis for having

th

ral world valu. Suh xampls onrn

no

just mathmatis’ fftivnss, ut also th

not

twn dfining what is applid and

tnsion

is astrat mathmatis. On th on hand,

what

Hardy has said that pur mathmatis is

G.H.

usful than applid”, aus it trains

“mor

thniqu so wll (Hardy 1940).

mathmatial

th othr hand, w hav Loahvsky’s

On

that thr is no suh thing as

argumnt

mathmatis, aus all mathmatis

“astrat”

somday applid to th ral world

will

wll-known ritiqu of Wignr’s argumnt,

A

mathmatiian Rihard Hamming (1980),

y

four “partial xplanations” to argu

provids

th fftivnss of mathmatis in th

that

sins is nithr miraulous nor

natural

unrasonal.

We see what we look for: “muh of what w

oms from th glasss w put on” wrot

s

We create the kind of mathematics

look for: for xampl, in fforts to

we

physial fors, physiists

undrstand

trid salars, thn vtors, and finally

first

tnsors. And Nwton's thory of

invntd

was rplad y th nwr, ttr

gravity

of gnral rlativity. Instad of a

modl

fftivnss, w s hr trial

miraulous

Mathematics and natural science address

a part of human existence, answering

only

few problems: this,

comparatively

and politial philosophy, for

asthtis

ar rtainly not fftivly

xampl,

y mathmatis. Chaptr 8

xplaind

how mathmatis may hav n

xplors

too far in th human sins.

takn

Evolution has primed humans to think

our mathmatial aility

mathematically:

not a oinidn, w hav survivd

is

of it. This argumnt is on of

aus

I. Scope

I. Scope

(Loahvsky quotd in dPillis 2002).

(1980). Th xampls w find aris

Hamming

th mathmatial tools usd, in a slf-

from

rfrntial logi.

Statu of Galilo Galili in Florn, Italy

Figure 11.1

and rror.

survival ias.

323

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!