Theory of Knowledge - Course Companion for Students Marija Uzunova Dang Arvin Singh Uzunov Dang
there any groups of people whoseAreyou typically do not giveclaimsit inevitable that a claims-maker’sIsshould affect our assessment ofidentitysecond form of epistemic injustice arisesAa person’s knowledge of their livedwhenis invalidated, because of a lackexperienceshared concepts between them and theofculture or power in a society. Thisdominantthem at a disadvantage in comprehendingputscommunicating their experience. We seeandhappening cross-culturally, when thethisculture is the arbiter of what counts asdominantand what has legitimacy. Newcomersknowledgethis culture may find their perspectives ortodismissed not only because of theirclaimswhich would be a form of prejudice,identity,because others simply have no idea whatbutare talking about. Power has a role totheycertain types of lived experiences areplay;more frequently than others. Asinvalidatedpractices of mathematics throughexamples,or through drawings with rice floursong,Chapter11), have been dismissed as not(seeand oral histories have not beenmathematical;the same credit as written histories (seegiven9). These are examples of knowledgesChapterdo not meet each other as equals becausethatpower asymmetries and a lack of sharedofconcepts.exactly is the role of power in epistemicWhatIn Chapter 7, II.1 we ask whetherjustice?is power. Perhaps a better questionknowledgethe extent to which power determines whatisas knowledge, even to affirm or denycountslived experiences of others. If someonethefor example, to be able to speak to treesclaims,horses, to invalidate their claim is also toortheir experience of the world. A moreinvalidateand challenging example is givencompellingexplains that this sort of epistemicFrickerarises from a gap in shared concepts,injusticeand tools of social interpretation.vocabularyyou can imagine, this gap affects differentAsgroups very differently, depending onsocialextent to which they are marginalized. Thetheof marginalized groups are lessexperiencesto be understood or conceptualized—lesslikelyto feature in films and television shows,likelyexample—perhaps even by the members offorgroups themselves. The very structure oftheseknowledge can therefore be prejudicial.collectivegroups’ efforts at communicating mayTheseseen as inadequate simply because theirbeof expressing is misunderstood. They arestylebecause they cannot make sense ofdisadvantagedexpress an “experience which it is strongly inorinterests to render intelligible” Fricker 2007).theirMay 2016, the IB set the following questionInTOK candidates.“To what extent do theforthat we use shape the conclusions thatconceptsreach?” Consider how this question appliesweour judgments about the validity of claimstoclaims-makers; how much of our judgmentandshaped by the concepts that we do and do notiswith a claims-maker?shareall of this, what are our individualGiventowards epistemic justice,responsibilitiesyou continue to explore knowledge in thisAsremember to continue reflecting criticallycourse,the knowledge you encounter at school andonthe world, the gaps left by your education andinand how these intersect with powerupbringing,that may initially be invisible to you.relationschapters that follow will help you to makeTherelations visible and navigate knowledgepowerthe world with agency. How will youandto know and live in the world?chooseIV. EthicsIV. Ethics(a)A central case of this sort of injustice is found in theexample of a woman who suers sexual harassmentlegitimacy to? In what context, and why?prior to the time when we had this critical concept,(b)so that she cannot properly comprehend her ownexperience, let alone render it communicativelyintelligible to others.the legitimacy of their claim?IV.3.2 Validity(Fricker 2007)especially in cross-cultural contexts?below, by Fricker.21
Knowledgeand politics 2is concerned with the acquisition and application of power, in its many forms, as well asPoliticscollective decisions that are contestable. In knowledge and politics we refer not only to politicalalland structures, but also the wider sense of political life, in which we gather to deliberate andsystemsdecisions, as citizens as well as members of communities.makethis chapter we consider the tensions in knowledge and politics, such as the differences betweenInand opinion; facts and values; and reliability and neutrality. We answer the questions:knowledgeis knowledge political, and how does this affect knowledge? Despite longstanding negativewhypolitics is a way—perhaps a good way, perhaps the only way—of navigating divisiveconnotations,issues and stubborn problems, of attempting to change the world for the better.Initial discussion• Is politics the best method available to us for changing the world?• Is being knowledgeable a prerequisite for effective and active citizenship?• What attributes are necessary or desirable in a political leader?• What role does, and should, politics play in the institutions where knowledge is produced and disseminated?• How are agreement and disagreement on matters of fact dealt with within politics?• What gives validity to a knowledge claim in politics?22
- Page 1 and 2: THEORY OFO X F O R D I B D I P L O
- Page 3 and 4: University Press is a department of
- Page 5 and 6: ContentsCORE THEMEOPTIONAL THEMESiv
- Page 7 and 8: lucky circumstance brings you to th
- Page 9 and 10: I. Scopecan seem abstract, intimida
- Page 11 and 12: I. Scopeis complicated by power and
- Page 13 and 14: I. ScopeWhat factors limit our know
- Page 15 and 16: I. ScopeII. PerspectivesTOK we exam
- Page 17 and 18: II. Perspectivesmay have inherited
- Page 19 and 20: II. Perspectivesto Quassim Cassam,
- Page 21 and 22: III. Methods and toolsterms: NYT Ne
- Page 23 and 24: III. Methods and toolsof it? What m
- Page 25 and 26: III. Methods and toolsIV. Ethics(b)
- Page 27: IV. Ethicsin TOK is about the explo
- Page 31 and 32: I. Scopehas been great concern, esp
- Page 33 and 34: I. Scopeadministrative systems, had
- Page 35 and 36: I. Scopethis book we engage with th
- Page 37 and 38: II. Perspectives“Overton window
- Page 39 and 40: II. Perspectivesopposed to scientif
- Page 41 and 42: II. Perspectivesobjective “fact o
- Page 43 and 44: II. Perspectives7 deals with public
- Page 45 and 46: II. Perspectiveshe adds, ‘It wasn
- Page 47 and 48: II. Perspectivesargued that interne
- Page 49 and 50: II. Perspectivesmedia users report
- Page 51 and 52: III. Methods and toolsLorde said yo
- Page 53 and 54: III. Methods and toolsShould we tes
- Page 55 and 56: III. Methods and toolsend of the po
- Page 57 and 58: III. Methods and toolsIV. Ethicsthe
- Page 59 and 60: IV. Ethicsoffence enters the pictur
- Page 61 and 62: IV. Ethicsenabled by technology. Pr
- Page 63 and 64: IV. Ethicsa 2018 article for the Ne
- Page 65 and 66: Knowledgeand technology 3does it me
- Page 67 and 68: I. Scopereach of human-made objects
- Page 69 and 70: I. Scopeterms:SearchSubmarineTelege
- Page 71 and 72: section explores what we know about
- Page 73 and 74: 3.5a shows Margaret Hamilton,Figure
- Page 75 and 76: II. Perspectivesterms: How weSearch
- Page 77 and 78: the challenges outlined in the disc
there any groups of people whose
Are
you typically do not give
claims
it inevitable that a claims-maker’s
Is
should affect our assessment of
identity
second form of epistemic injustice arises
A
a person’s knowledge of their lived
when
is invalidated, because of a lack
experience
shared concepts between them and the
of
culture or power in a society. This
dominant
them at a disadvantage in comprehending
puts
communicating their experience. We see
and
happening cross-culturally, when the
this
culture is the arbiter of what counts as
dominant
and what has legitimacy. Newcomers
knowledge
this culture may find their perspectives or
to
dismissed not only because of their
claims
which would be a form of prejudice,
identity,
because others simply have no idea what
but
are talking about. Power has a role to
they
certain types of lived experiences are
play;
more frequently than others. As
invalidated
practices of mathematics through
examples,
or through drawings with rice flour
song,
Chapter11), have been dismissed as not
(see
and oral histories have not been
mathematical;
the same credit as written histories (see
given
9). These are examples of knowledges
Chapter
do not meet each other as equals because
that
power asymmetries and a lack of shared
of
concepts.
exactly is the role of power in epistemic
What
In Chapter 7, II.1 we ask whether
justice?
is power. Perhaps a better question
knowledge
the extent to which power determines what
is
as knowledge, even to affirm or deny
counts
lived experiences of others. If someone
the
for example, to be able to speak to trees
claims,
horses, to invalidate their claim is also to
or
their experience of the world. A more
invalidate
and challenging example is given
compelling
explains that this sort of epistemic
Fricker
arises from a gap in shared concepts,
injustice
and tools of social interpretation.
vocabulary
you can imagine, this gap affects different
As
groups very differently, depending on
social
extent to which they are marginalized. The
the
of marginalized groups are less
experiences
to be understood or conceptualized—less
likely
to feature in films and television shows,
likely
example—perhaps even by the members of
for
groups themselves. The very structure of
these
knowledge can therefore be prejudicial.
collective
groups’ efforts at communicating may
These
seen as inadequate simply because their
be
of expressing is misunderstood. They are
style
because they cannot make sense of
disadvantaged
express an “experience which it is strongly in
or
interests to render intelligible” Fricker 2007).
their
May 2016, the IB set the following question
In
TOK candidates.“To what extent do the
for
that we use shape the conclusions that
concepts
reach?” Consider how this question applies
we
our judgments about the validity of claims
to
claims-makers; how much of our judgment
and
shaped by the concepts that we do and do not
is
with a claims-maker?
share
all of this, what are our individual
Given
towards epistemic justice,
responsibilities
you continue to explore knowledge in this
As
remember to continue reflecting critically
course,
the knowledge you encounter at school and
on
the world, the gaps left by your education and
in
and how these intersect with power
upbringing,
that may initially be invisible to you.
relations
chapters that follow will help you to make
The
relations visible and navigate knowledge
power
the world with agency. How will you
and
to know and live in the world?
choose
IV. Ethics
IV. Ethics
(a)
A central case of this sort of injustice is found in the
example of a woman who suers sexual harassment
legitimacy to? In what context, and why?
prior to the time when we had this critical concept,
(b)
so that she cannot properly comprehend her own
experience, let alone render it communicatively
intelligible to others.
the legitimacy of their claim?
IV.3.2 Validity
(Fricker 2007)
especially in cross-cultural contexts?
below, by Fricker.
21