Theory of Knowledge - Course Companion for Students Marija Uzunova Dang Arvin Singh Uzunov Dang

ayodelepearce1
from ayodelepearce1 More from this publisher
21.11.2022 Views

It is desirable that in every country a committee composed of members of the teaching profession, including3.teachers, should be set up by the National Committee on Intellectual Co-Operation… .” (League ofhistory(a) Whos prsptivs influn what1.fats ar taught in shools?historialth rol of th govrnmnts,Considrhistory tahrs’ unions,nationaltahrs’ assoiations,intrnationalivi organizations,domstinon-govrnmntaltransnationaland othrs.organizations(b) How should this influn hkd2. What ar th impliations whn:xprts from anothr stat ar allowd(a)influn how history is taught in atotim, th sop of ths projts hasOvrfrom ilatral to rgional and gloalshiftdwith th rsult that thir produt isfforts,aout national “ompromis narrativs”lssallow for alignd ut sparat historis,whihmor aout a “ommon” shard history.andprsptivs ar gaind or lost in a shardWhattxtook vrsus a national historyhistoryWhr do your history txtooks fittxtook?shm?inthisdid th moral imprativs and standardsHowths projts aris? Or, as Simon Lässigfor“Who initiatd, inspird and arrid outasks,projts? … what is th natur of th tnsionthintervention and empowerment with rgardtwnhistory duation rform …?” (Korostlina,to2013). Lässig uss th word “mpowrmnt”Lässigto dsri loal ownrship of th outoms ofhrprojts, of th popl whos history is ingthsin thos projts. Th alan twnrwrittnxprts from anothr stat ar not(b)to influn how history isallowdand th stat has a monopoly ontaughtgts taught in th national historywhat(a) In trms of th history urriulum,3.what irumstans shouldundrhistorian and history tahrs'th limitd?autonomyDos th tahing of history rquir(b)or diffrnt ontrols to thadditionalmpowrmnt and xtrnal intrvntionloalinfluns whthr th projt will ultimatlywould suss look lik? If th mtri isWhatit rsults in a txtook that is offiiallywhthrand shard y two or mor ountris,santiondw hav rlativly fw suss storis, andthnoms mor ompliatd whnThisprojts ar initiatd, fundd orrvisionisty third partis, suh as othrsupportdstakholdrs and NGOs. Forintrnationalth Southast Europan Jointxampl,Projt produd a st of “altrnativHistorymatrials”, and on projt induationalEast Asia rsultd in txtooks thatNorthnot offiially santiond ut wr usd towrnational txtooks in China, SouthomplmntII. PerspectivesII. PerspectivesNations 1937)Disuss th following qustions.urriulum?and ontrolld?tahing of othr sujts?givn national duation systm“sussful”.Histoir-Gshiht is among thm.Kora and Japan.259

II. Perspectivesor indpndnt shools oftn hav thPrivatto hoos to us txtooks othr thanfrdomWhat ar th advantags and1.of this?disadvantagsHav you nountrd diffrnt aounts2.“your” history?ofHav you xprind or osrvd a3.twn th historial narrativslashto your parnts or grandparnts’knownvrsus th aounts taughtgnrationsyou today in national or intrnationaltoduation systms? How havEnglishrspondd? Shar and ompar youryouin your lass.answrsChapter 7 we encounter Thomas Nagel’sInof objectivity as “the view fromdescriptionTo what extent is this the goal ofnowhere”.education systems in general, and ofinternationalhistory textbooks in particular? To what extenttheirthis goal possible and desirable?ishas your acquisition of knowledge, in historyHowother AOKs, been shaped by the compromisesandhave been made to make knowledge objectivethatneutral? orof th ontxtual fators to onsidrSomwhthr ths projts ar ondutd inaror ongoing onflit thatrs, andpost-onflitthy spill ovr national oundaris.whthran important fator is whthrAdditionally,mrg within post-olonial or prsnt-daythyolonial stats, suh as India and Canadasttlrrsptivly.used to think that the profession of history, unlikeIof, say, nuclear physics, could at least do nothatrvision projts rquir thos involvdTxtookagr not mrly on th fats of dats andtoof vnts, ut on th auss, signifianplasimpat of vnts, and how ths vntsandxampls rval a politial dimnsionThsonsnsus and disagrmnt in history.toprojts ar asd on th ida of tahingManythrough multipl prsptivs, withhistoryojtiv ing to giv spa to diffrntthinluding onfliting viws. Thisvois,gaind popularity in Wstrn andapproahEurop in th 1970s, and movd thNorthrnof historial knowldg from th ontntfoustxtooks—th “fats”—to th aility toofsours and prsptivs.valuatmultiplis this approah to history appropriat on aButxtnt to whih “th us of multiplThand ontrovrsy" is univrsallyprsptivsis an opn qustion. Lässig dsris thisusfulas nssarily a Wstrn onption ofapproahthere situations in which dierent sourceAreand historiographical interpretationsstatementsplace too high demands on pupils andsimplyin which both rather require a ‘usable past’teachers,9For reflectionCommon textbooks andNow I know it can. . . . We have a responsibilityharm.historical facts in general, and for criticizing thetopolitico-ideological abuse of history in particular.(Hobsbawm 1993)“compromise narratives”th approvd stat duational matrials.onstrut th national narrativ.gloal sal?Making connectionsHistory, objectivity and the knowerhistorial instrution, and asks th following.with a master narrative that provides direction …?(Lässig in Korostelina, Lässig 2013)260

It is desirable that in every country a committee composed of members of the teaching profession, including

3.

teachers, should be set up by the National Committee on Intellectual Co-Operation… .” (League of

history

(a) Whos prsptivs influn what

1.

fats ar taught in shools?

historial

th rol of th govrnmnts,

Considr

history tahrs’ unions,

national

tahrs’ assoiations,

intrnational

ivi organizations,

domsti

non-govrnmntal

transnational

and othrs.

organizations

(b) How should this influn hkd

2. What ar th impliations whn:

xprts from anothr stat ar allowd

(a)

influn how history is taught in a

to

tim, th sop of ths projts has

Ovr

from ilatral to rgional and gloal

shiftd

with th rsult that thir produt is

fforts,

aout national “ompromis narrativs”

lss

allow for alignd ut sparat historis,

whih

mor aout a “ommon” shard history.

and

prsptivs ar gaind or lost in a shard

What

txtook vrsus a national history

history

Whr do your history txtooks fit

txtook?

shm?

inthis

did th moral imprativs and standards

How

ths projts aris? Or, as Simon Lässig

for

“Who initiatd, inspird and arrid out

asks,

projts? … what is th natur of th tnsion

th

intervention and empowerment with rgard

twn

history duation rform …?” (Korostlina,

to

2013). Lässig uss th word “mpowrmnt”

Lässig

to dsri loal ownrship of th outoms of

hr

projts, of th popl whos history is ing

ths

in thos projts. Th alan twn

rwrittn

xprts from anothr stat ar not

(b)

to influn how history is

allowd

and th stat has a monopoly on

taught

gts taught in th national history

what

(a) In trms of th history urriulum,

3.

what irumstans should

undr

historian and history tahrs'

th

limitd?

autonomy

Dos th tahing of history rquir

(b)

or diffrnt ontrols to th

additional

mpowrmnt and xtrnal intrvntion

loal

influns whthr th projt will

ultimatly

would suss look lik? If th mtri is

What

it rsults in a txtook that is offiially

whthr

and shard y two or mor ountris,

santiond

w hav rlativly fw suss storis, and

thn

oms mor ompliatd whn

This

projts ar initiatd, fundd or

rvisionist

y third partis, suh as othr

supportd

stakholdrs and NGOs. For

intrnational

th Southast Europan Joint

xampl,

Projt produd a st of “altrnativ

History

matrials”, and on projt in

duational

East Asia rsultd in txtooks that

North

not offiially santiond ut wr usd to

wr

national txtooks in China, South

omplmnt

II. Perspectives

II. Perspectives

Nations 1937)

Disuss th following qustions.

urriulum?

and ontrolld?

tahing of othr sujts?

givn national duation systm

“sussful”.

Histoir-Gshiht is among thm.

Kora and Japan.

259

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!