Theory of Knowledge - Course Companion for Students Marija Uzunova Dang Arvin Singh Uzunov Dang

ayodelepearce1
from ayodelepearce1 More from this publisher
21.11.2022 Views

original studies had shown true effects”thein Baker 2016).(quotedthe other hand, Brian Nosek, leader ofOnOpen Science Collaboration project,thethat Gilbert’s “optimisticrespondedis limited by statisticalassessmentencounter disagreements between expertsWethis chapter and Chapter 7.throughoutrecurring question for TOK is what toAabout it. If someone is not sufficientlydoin statistics how should theycompetentNosek’s versus Gilbert’s arguments?evaluateauthors of a study are the people mostThefamiliar with the weaknesses andcloselyto their own findings. Sometimes,limitationsare the foremost experts in their sub-theyand may be the first to come acrossdisciplines,that undermines their confidenceevidencethe results that propelled their careers.init remains rare for academics to publiclyYet,back their work, so replications remaintakenext best way to find out about suspecttheA timely response to the replicationfindings.is the Loss of Confidence Project: theissueorganized, institutional platform forfirstto declare a loss of confidence in theirauthorsresearch. The Loss of Confidence projectownof a voluntary nature and researchers canissubmit loss of confidence for their ownonlyIf a researcher has lost confidenceresearch.their findings, why not retract the study?inloss of confidence a soft alternative toIsRetractions are not necessarilyretraction?journal can also retract avoluntary—areplication problem within human sciencesTheand psychology specifically, is an ongoinggenerally,as of 2020 but there is a consensuscontroversyaround the view that a significant problemformingSome have lamented that the tenor ofexists.discourse is divisive and antagonistic, andtheand popular science outlets are accusednewspapersreporting it with sensational headlines equivalentof“Psychology is dead”. Whether we call it atoa crisis, a disagreement or an opportunity,problem,episode has caused both students andtheto examine more closely how academicresearchersis produced in the human sciences,knowledgeterms of the incentives, institutional structures,inand practical constraints withinassumptionsThis is something to be welcomed.academia.any rate, initiatives such as RetractionAtand the Loss of Confidence projectWatchquestionable or discarded findings easiermaketrack. These initiatives are mechanismstokeeping the body of scientific knowledgeforand up to date. Essentially, they raisereliableof professional ethical conductquestionstransparency, and those issues take us toandsubmission to the project came fromOneDana Carney, who came topsychologistthe findings of her 2010 paper onrefuteposes’, co-authored with Amy Cuddy.‘powerstudy centred on the idea that adopting aThepose could be beneficial in stressfulpowerfulAlthough the pair’s work onsituations.poses had gained a lot of attention—powerCuddy’s associated TED talk remainsandof the most watched—in 2016 Carneyonecompelled to admit that she nofeltbelieved in the conclusions of herlongerIII. Methods and toolsIII. Methods and toolsmisconceptions” (quoted in Baker 2016).Box 8.4: Destigmatizing loss of confidencesection IV.original study.published article on the basis of error or fraud.239

III. Methods and toolsIV. Ethics7 describes how the material andChapterpower of scientific knowledge—tonarrativeas well as tell stories about the naturalinfluencea robust ethics. This chapterworld—necessitatesshown that the human sciences describes ashasas shapes our social reality in a similarlywellway, affecting how we understand,powerfulor disagree about human nature, moralityagreejustice, what is fundamental to all people,andwhat is different. Challenging issues canandpolitical with comparatively few, if any,becometruths to draw on. We have seen thatempiricalwe do not know, and therefore what wewhatassume, can deeply influence knowledgemustpractical outcomes. The ethics of the humanandmust take into account power, influence,sciencesgives us the power to makeKnowledgean impact on the planet that some havesuchto name the present geologic era,proposedAnthropocene, after us. Amid mountingthethat human activity is alteringevidenceand Earth systems, the concept of thesocialthe past few years. If you are unsure aboutinthe concept means, follow the link towhatcomprehensive explainer video that is anaintroduction to the topic. In the videoexcellentAnthropocene is described and justified intheof the impact of humans on the planet.termsterms:Searchthe ageAnthropocenethe Anthropocene may requireKnowingtrans-disciplinary modes of knowledgenewand sharing that current institutionsproductionnot allow for. If the following sections sounddoEarth science and you are wonderinglikethey are here, keep that thought inwhyalongside the concept of natureculturemind,section II. Consider also the problem offromthe observer from the observationremovingthe modeller from the model in the name oforGiven the scale and depth of humanobjectivity.on the planet, is it even possible to speakimpactnature without speaking about humans ataboutsame time?the8Figure 8.5aThe two low-power poses used in the study.Figure 8.5bThe two high-power poses used in the study.Participants in this condition were posed in contractiveParticipants in this condition were posed in expansivepositions with closed limbs.positions with open limbs.I V. E T H I C Sof mankind YouTuberesponsibility and fairness.Anthropocene has been intensively theorized240

III. Methods and tools

IV. Ethics

7 describes how the material and

Chapter

power of scientific knowledge—to

narrative

as well as tell stories about the natural

influence

a robust ethics. This chapter

world—necessitates

shown that the human sciences describes as

has

as shapes our social reality in a similarly

well

way, affecting how we understand,

powerful

or disagree about human nature, morality

agree

justice, what is fundamental to all people,

and

what is different. Challenging issues can

and

political with comparatively few, if any,

become

truths to draw on. We have seen that

empirical

we do not know, and therefore what we

what

assume, can deeply influence knowledge

must

practical outcomes. The ethics of the human

and

must take into account power, influence,

sciences

gives us the power to make

Knowledge

an impact on the planet that some have

such

to name the present geologic era,

proposed

Anthropocene, after us. Amid mounting

the

that human activity is altering

evidence

and Earth systems, the concept of the

social

the past few years. If you are unsure about

in

the concept means, follow the link to

what

comprehensive explainer video that is an

a

introduction to the topic. In the video

excellent

Anthropocene is described and justified in

the

of the impact of humans on the planet.

terms

terms:

Search

the age

Anthropocene

the Anthropocene may require

Knowing

trans-disciplinary modes of knowledge

new

and sharing that current institutions

production

not allow for. If the following sections sound

do

Earth science and you are wondering

like

they are here, keep that thought in

why

alongside the concept of natureculture

mind,

section II. Consider also the problem of

from

the observer from the observation

removing

the modeller from the model in the name of

or

Given the scale and depth of human

objectivity.

on the planet, is it even possible to speak

impact

nature without speaking about humans at

about

same time?

the

8

Figure 8.5a

The two low-power poses used in the study.

Figure 8.5b

The two high-power poses used in the study.

Participants in this condition were posed in contractive

Participants in this condition were posed in expansive

positions with closed limbs.

positions with open limbs.

I V. E T H I C S

of mankind YouTube

responsibility and fairness.

Anthropocene has been intensively theorized

240

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!