21.11.2022 Views

Theory of Knowledge - Course Companion for Students Marija Uzunova Dang Arvin Singh Uzunov Dang

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

III. Methods and tools

is the scope for experimentation in the

What

sciences? Psychology is somewhat

human

among the human sciences in this

unique

An often heard lament about the lack

regard.

predictive power of disciplines such as

of

and political science is based on the

economics

or impossibility of doing controlled

difficulty

Is there special value in knowledge

experiments.

helps to accurately predict the outcomes of

that

and reforms?

policies

there is value in experiments, as

Certainly

and behavioural economics

psychology

shown, with the success of randomized

have

trials. However, one challenge with

controlled

evidence is that it is liable to

experimental

and can provide a false sense

misinterpretation

certainty. Section I discussed the fallout

of

economics’ overreliance on mathematical

of

and physics envy. This section has

models

the problems of knowledge that

highlighted

arise from sampling, such as the WEIRD

can

(see III.1). Next we consider the limitations

bias

experiments, and experimental results, in

of

human sciences. But first, a cautionary tale

the

terms: Hari Addiction

Search

YouTube

the linked video, Johann Hari

In

to show that everything we know about

tries

is wrong. The topic of fallibility—the

addiction

capacity to be wrong, and the realization

human

being wrong—is a key issue in TOK. It is a

of

knowledge to develop and self-correct,

wayfor

watching the video on the original

After

studies done on caged rats as well

addiction

the 1970s “rat park” experiments, consider

as

following questions.

the

What were the shortfalls of the rat cage

1.

and how do we protect against

studies,

At what point do you think scientists

2.

enough data to make a policy

have

Which criteria should the knowledge

3.

by scientists satisfy?

produced

How can scientists protect against being

4.

and recommending something

wrong

Alexander’s “rat park” study helped

Bruce

pivot the narrative of addiction away from

to

moral and mental failings of addicts, and

the

addiction as an adaptation to social

towards

The study went unnoticed for many

dislocation.

whilst governments around the world

years,

to pursue a “war on drugs”. Criticism

continued

this expensive, aggressive and ultimately

of

policy, which often involves

unsuccessful

has grown and so has interest in

incarceration,

study. There is now a widespread—

Alexander’s

not universal—understanding that more

though

is needed for people struggling with

compassion

addiction.

discarding the important impact of

Without

park study and wildly popular TED

therat

should acknowledge that efforts to

talk,we

the experimental results have been

replicate

There are also significant concerns

inconclusive.

the experiment. One of the design flaws,

about

example, seems to be that in the original

for

male and female rats were separated,

studies

in the rat park study they were

whereas

together. The main question, though,

mixed

8

III.5 Experimentation in the human

For discussion and reflection

sciences

Knowing about and acting on

addiction

repeating them in the future?

recommendation?

harmful?

5. What is the role of the public?

about rats, drugs and parks.

but it can also shake our confidence.

236

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!