Theory of Knowledge - Course Companion for Students Marija Uzunova Dang Arvin Singh Uzunov Dang

ayodelepearce1
from ayodelepearce1 More from this publisher
21.11.2022 Views

Figure 8.1 “Guards” and their “prisoners” during the experiment conducted at Stanford Universityprison experiment was describedZimbardo’sTwitter as “antiscientific” by psychologyonSimine Vazire, after new evidenceprofessorthat the experimental design andrevealedmay have been quite poor andexecutionby investigator bias. Thecompromisedhas lost some of its landmarkexperimentand its legacy poses familiar questions,status,was referring to an article by Ben Blum, whichVazireexcellent TOK reading.isWhat is an appropriate response when•knowledge is shown to beestablishedHow do we best separate the personality and•of the researcher from the research?reputationWhat is the responsibility of professors and•in the process of knowledge sharingteachersterms: BlumSearchlifespan of a lieThethe link to read the article and then discuss the following questions with a partner, in aFollowgroup or as a class.small1. How might the beliefs, interests and experiences of researchers affect their research?2. What kinds of checks are necessary to ensure the integrity of the results and conclusions of3. How should we guard against being too quick to accept scientific theories that align with theII. PerspectivesII. Perspectivescontroversial?and transfer?such as the following.For discussionIntegrity in researchresearch?cultural climate of the time?217

II. Perspectivesallegations of scientific misconduct inTheStanford Prison experiment, and thetheconcerns about Milgram’smethodologicalexperiments, are part of a bigobedienceof the reliability of psychology’sre-evaluationfindings. We explore more ofbest-knownin III.6. It may come to be known as thethisscientific controversy of the 2010s, butbiggestat this scale in a discipline isself-questioningunprecedented. As II.2 below explains,hardlyabout a quarter of a century a debate ragedinforthat spilled beyond academia toanthropologyMead was the most famousMargaretof the 20th century. Indeed,anthropologistthe time of her death in 1978 she hadbysynonymous with the field of culturalbecomeShe was the “Mother to theanthropology.according to Time magazine (1969), andWorld”of the Presidential Medal of Freedom,recipienthighest civilian honour in the UnitedtheTaking visible positions in society andStates.civil rights, gender equality andchampioningjustice, she went beyond the callenvironmentalacademic duty to become a public icon. Meadofthe standards for what it means to be a publicsetand was widely considered asanthropologistof the greats of the discipline already duringonelifetime. Then there was controversy, asherit was major news in 1983, ve years after her…when Derek Freeman, a New Zealand-borndeath,published Margaret Mead and Samoa:anthropologist,Making and Unmaking of an AnthropologicalThea slashing attack criticizing Mead’s near-iconicMyth,as deeply awed if not deliberately distortedstudypromote ideas that had as much to do with her owntoon sex and with American culture of the 1920sviewsthe publication of Freeman’s book, anBeforeappeared on the front page of the Newarticletaking an interest in the controversies ofmedianarrow academic field. The episode becameadivisive and exposed ideological faultdeeplyin academic anthropology as well as inlinesCould it be that the power of culturesociety.shape human behaviour had been hugelytoFigure 8.2 Margaret Mead dressed in traditional clothing duringattack on Mead’s anthropology alsoFreeman’sthe liberalism and feminism of herthreatenedwork. To understand why, we need a basiccivicof the conflicting knowledgeunderstandingthat were made. Mead’s Coming of AgeclaimsSamoa (1928) was a key development in theindebate. It claimed that whilenature-nurturepuberty was universal, the turmoilbiologicaladolescence often said to accompany it wasofproduct of culture. Mead offered a rangeaevidence for this, but there was one majoroffor many, and especially for Freeman.concerndescribed Samoa as a sexually liberalMeadand claimed that this made pubertycultureharmonious for young Samoans asmoreto their rebellious American peers.compared8overstated for half acentury?attract intense public interest foryears.II.2 Of heroines and hereticsher time in Samoaexplained by anthropologist Paul Shankman:as with adolescence in Polynesia.(Shankman 2009)York Times anticipating it, which showed massFreeman challenged this description of Samoan218

II. Perspectives

allegations of scientific misconduct in

The

Stanford Prison experiment, and the

the

concerns about Milgram’s

methodological

experiments, are part of a big

obedience

of the reliability of psychology’s

re-evaluation

findings. We explore more of

best-known

in III.6. It may come to be known as the

this

scientific controversy of the 2010s, but

biggest

at this scale in a discipline is

self-questioning

unprecedented. As II.2 below explains,

hardly

about a quarter of a century a debate ragedin

for

that spilled beyond academia to

anthropology

Mead was the most famous

Margaret

of the 20th century. Indeed,

anthropologist

the time of her death in 1978 she had

by

synonymous with the field of cultural

become

She was the “Mother to the

anthropology.

according to Time magazine (1969), and

World”

of the Presidential Medal of Freedom,

recipient

highest civilian honour in the United

the

Taking visible positions in society and

States.

civil rights, gender equality and

championing

justice, she went beyond the call

environmental

academic duty to become a public icon. Mead

of

the standards for what it means to be a public

set

and was widely considered as

anthropologist

of the greats of the discipline already during

one

lifetime. Then there was controversy, as

her

it was major news in 1983, ve years after her

when Derek Freeman, a New Zealand-born

death,

published Margaret Mead and Samoa:

anthropologist,

Making and Unmaking of an Anthropological

The

a slashing attack criticizing Mead’s near-iconic

Myth,

as deeply awed if not deliberately distorted

study

promote ideas that had as much to do with her own

to

on sex and with American culture of the 1920s

views

the publication of Freeman’s book, an

Before

appeared on the front page of the New

article

taking an interest in the controversies of

media

narrow academic field. The episode became

a

divisive and exposed ideological fault

deeply

in academic anthropology as well as in

lines

Could it be that the power of culture

society.

shape human behaviour had been hugely

to

Figure 8.2 Margaret Mead dressed in traditional clothing during

attack on Mead’s anthropology also

Freeman’s

the liberalism and feminism of her

threatened

work. To understand why, we need a basic

civic

of the conflicting knowledge

understanding

that were made. Mead’s Coming of Age

claims

Samoa (1928) was a key development in the

in

debate. It claimed that while

nature-nurture

puberty was universal, the turmoil

biological

adolescence often said to accompany it was

of

product of culture. Mead offered a range

a

evidence for this, but there was one major

of

for many, and especially for Freeman.

concern

described Samoa as a sexually liberal

Mead

and claimed that this made puberty

culture

harmonious for young Samoans as

more

to their rebellious American peers.

compared

8

overstated for half acentury?

attract intense public interest foryears.

II.2 Of heroines and heretics

her time in Samoa

explained by anthropologist Paul Shankman:

as with adolescence in Polynesia.

(Shankman 2009)

York Times anticipating it, which showed mass

Freeman challenged this description of Samoan

218

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!