Theory of Knowledge - Course Companion for Students Marija Uzunova Dang Arvin Singh Uzunov Dang

ayodelepearce1
from ayodelepearce1 More from this publisher
21.11.2022 Views

people realise that psychologists also take a vow,Fewthat at some point in their professionalpromisingthey will publish a book, a chapter or at least anlivesthat contains the sentence: ‘The human beingarticlethe only animal that ... ’. We are allowed to nishissentence any way we like, but it has to start withtheof us wait until relatively late in our careers toMostthis solemn obligation because we know thatfullgenerations of psychologists will ignoresuccessivethe other words that we managed to pack into aallof well-intentioned scholarship and rememberlifetimemainly for how we nished The Sentence.usalso know that the worse we do, the betterWewill be remembered. For instance, thosewewho nished The Sentence with ‘canpsychologistslanguage’ were particularly well rememberedusechimpanzees were taught to communicatewhenhand signs.withwhen researchers discovered that chimps in theAndused sticks to extract tasty termites from theirwild(and to bash each other over the head nowmoundsagain), the world suddenly remembered the fullandit is with good reason that most psychologistsSoo completing The Sentence for as long as theyputhoping that if they wait long enough, they mightcan,die in time to avoid being publicly humiliated byjustGilbert’s words may seem comical,Danielthey point out the problem with definingbuthuman activities: monkeys dodistinctlywhales sing, birds use fire, honeybeesbusiness,complex social behaviour, treesexhibitand share resources with eachcommunicateWith each discovery the list gets longer,other.the arguments for human exceptionalismandso. In fact, it is a struggle to think of anylessthat show non-humans being lessstudiesthan previously thought. Howsophisticatedcan we justify the status of the humanthenis the body of scientific knowledge aboutWhyconsidered by TOK to be at least ashumankindas our knowledge about the rest ofimportantnatural world combined?thein response to these questions, JoannaWritingsays that the distinction between theBourkeand the animal is not only contested,human“policed with demonic precision”.butideas, values and practices used to justify the…of a particular understanding of ‘thesovereigntyover the rest of sentient life are what createhuman’and social life. Perhaps the very conceptsociety‘culture’ is an attempt to dierentiate ourselvesofour ‘creatureliness’, our eshly vulnerability …fromthose territories not only involves violence,Delimitinginspires it.butknowledge questions arising from theThesciences are also significant because ofhumanpower of this AOK to inform policy, socialtheindividual action and choice.movements,body of knowledge shapes the realities,Thisand behaviours it studies. Inphenomenaevidence-based decisions about howmakingorganize our societies and lead our lives,tomake significant use of knowledge fromweAOK. We look, for example, to culturalthisto make sense of our similaritiesanthropologydifferences in an increasingly interconnectedandand to economics to guide decisionmakingworld,in a world of finite resources, timeinformation. For these reasons, we mustandattention to theory building and conceptpayin the human sciences—and considerformationwhat extent they reflect, versus shape, thetothe aim of the human sciences primarily toIsand explain patterns of human activity,describemake predictions about outcomes in society,toguide interventions and inform action, ortoI. ScopeI. Scopethose eight words.(Bourke 2011)and mailing address of every psychologistnameever nished The Sentence with the wordswho‘uses tools’.a monkey.(Gilbert 2007)reality of human experience.something else entirely?sciences as a separate AOK?207

I. Scopeof an idea or theory coming from anyThinkof the human sciences that describes oronean important part of the humanexplainsone that you haveexperience—perhapswhich words you would use toConsiderthe power of this idea or theory.describeyou say it determined, defined, shaped,Wouldor influenced aspects of the world?affectedyour answer with a partner or in a classShareTogether or individually considerdiscussion.is called the human sciences in TOK isWhatreferred to as social sciences outside ofusuallycourse. Both terms appear interchangeably inthischapter but perhaps the difference is that onethisits starting point the human individual,makesother the collective society. Whicheverthepoint is used, the great diversity ofstartingwithin the human sciences challengesdisciplinescoherence and cohesion of this AOK. Isthemore that distinguishes rather than unifiestherehuman science disciplines? Do they havethein common than not? Does it even makemoreto refer to them collectively as the humansenseTo explore those questions, this chaptersciences?at their historical origins, methodologicallooksconceptual frameworks andapproaches,in the real world, that may justifyapplicationsto them collectively.referringquest for scientific answers, in the narrowTheof the term, to fundamentally social andsensequestions dates back to the Enlightenmenthumanof the 18th century. What was then calledthinkersmoral sciences set out to advance freedomthehumanity. The aim of Enlightenment thinkersandto produce knowledge about humans andwassocieties based on disinterested and value-freeourTo what extent does knowledge in the1.sciences derive its value from itshumanIf knowledge in the human sciences has3.consequences on the world, inmaterialthe concepts of value, neutrality andKeepin mind, and trace how they come uppowerthis chapter, and in the production,throughoutand application of knowledge inacquisitionof the main objectives of the TOK courseOneto interrogate the extent to which knowledgeisbe disinterested and value-free. Refer to thecandebate between Hobbes and Boyle,17th-centurythe relationship between knowledge andaboutwith which we open Chapter 2. It wouldpolitics,be until the intellectual debates of the 20thnotthat the human sciences, as the social andcenturytheorist Peter Wagner argues, gainedpoliticalindependent status to provide knowledgeenoughwas considered valid and useful. Thesethatabout the big questions of humanitydebatessociology, psychology, anthropology andshapedinto the disciplines we recognize today.economicsbrought doubts about the value of theTheysciences to the surface, to be acknowledgedhumangrappled with. And there was, even then, aandgroup “inclined to entirely abandonsignificantattempt to render the social world intelligibleanythe face of its complexity and lack of evidentin(Wagner 2001). And therefore we see thatorder”starting assumption of the human sciences isthechapter explores some of the attempts,Thisand failures of the human sciences tosuccesseswith the messiness of human nature andengagereality.social8For reflection and discussionExplanations, neutrality and power inthe human sciencespotential for application?Can you think of an idea or theory in the2.sciences that has value, but no effecthumanon the world?encountered in your studies.what sense can it be neutral?Which words did you choose and why?the human sciences.the following questions.that humans are knowable to themselves.evaluation and analysis of empirical evidence.208

I. Scope

of an idea or theory coming from any

Think

of the human sciences that describes or

one

an important part of the human

explains

one that you have

experience—perhaps

which words you would use to

Consider

the power of this idea or theory.

describe

you say it determined, defined, shaped,

Would

or influenced aspects of the world?

affected

your answer with a partner or in a class

Share

Together or individually consider

discussion.

is called the human sciences in TOK is

What

referred to as social sciences outside of

usually

course. Both terms appear interchangeably in

this

chapter but perhaps the difference is that one

this

its starting point the human individual,

makes

other the collective society. Whichever

the

point is used, the great diversity of

starting

within the human sciences challenges

disciplines

coherence and cohesion of this AOK. Is

the

more that distinguishes rather than unifies

there

human science disciplines? Do they have

the

in common than not? Does it even make

more

to refer to them collectively as the human

sense

To explore those questions, this chapter

sciences?

at their historical origins, methodological

looks

conceptual frameworks and

approaches,

in the real world, that may justify

applications

to them collectively.

referring

quest for scientific answers, in the narrow

The

of the term, to fundamentally social and

sense

questions dates back to the Enlightenment

human

of the 18th century. What was then called

thinkers

moral sciences set out to advance freedom

the

humanity. The aim of Enlightenment thinkers

and

to produce knowledge about humans and

was

societies based on disinterested and value-free

our

To what extent does knowledge in the

1.

sciences derive its value from its

human

If knowledge in the human sciences has

3.

consequences on the world, in

material

the concepts of value, neutrality and

Keep

in mind, and trace how they come up

power

this chapter, and in the production,

throughout

and application of knowledge in

acquisition

of the main objectives of the TOK course

One

to interrogate the extent to which knowledge

is

be disinterested and value-free. Refer to the

can

debate between Hobbes and Boyle,

17th-century

the relationship between knowledge and

about

with which we open Chapter 2. It would

politics,

be until the intellectual debates of the 20th

not

that the human sciences, as the social and

century

theorist Peter Wagner argues, gained

political

independent status to provide knowledge

enough

was considered valid and useful. These

that

about the big questions of humanity

debates

sociology, psychology, anthropology and

shaped

into the disciplines we recognize today.

economics

brought doubts about the value of the

They

sciences to the surface, to be acknowledged

human

grappled with. And there was, even then, a

and

group “inclined to entirely abandon

significant

attempt to render the social world intelligible

any

the face of its complexity and lack of evident

in

(Wagner 2001). And therefore we see that

order”

starting assumption of the human sciences is

the

chapter explores some of the attempts,

This

and failures of the human sciences to

successes

with the messiness of human nature and

engage

reality.

social

8

For reflection and discussion

Explanations, neutrality and power in

the human sciences

potential for application?

Can you think of an idea or theory in the

2.

sciences that has value, but no effect

human

on the world?

encountered in your studies.

what sense can it be neutral?

Which words did you choose and why?

the human sciences.

the following questions.

that humans are knowable to themselves.

evaluation and analysis of empirical evidence.

208

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!