Theory of Knowledge - Course Companion for Students Marija Uzunova Dang Arvin Singh Uzunov Dang
Figure 7.7 Map of th trad winds takn from Edmond Hally, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London 16 (1686–92)observations are repeatedly andWhenperformed, errors can be spottedsystematicallycorrected. Patterns emerge that can describeandexplain more complex phenomena, suchandthe movement of the ocean’s currents or theasof celestial objects in the night sky.pathsidea that despite our fallibility and ourThispowers of perception, if enough oflimitedlook at nature carefully, enough times, anusimage will emerge, can be a powerfulaccuratethis discussion, you will be focusing onIn(the science of finding, classifyingtaxonomynaming organisms). Modern biology restsanda foundation of the categories meticulouslyonfor the purposes of classifying lifeconstructedbiodiversity.andTo what extent do taxonomic categories1.an underlying order in nature?revealWhat would count as evidence that2.categories accurately describetaxonomicevolutionary relationships betweentheand genera?speciesis demanding work—long andObservationhours, maintaining rigorous schedules,oddto remote places at personal risk andtravellinghandling strange things or ordinary thingscost,strange ways. Despite this, observation is notindescribed as tedium but as exhilaration.typicallyis this most thrilling thing that we seeWhatwe observe nature? Would it be any lesswhenif the image that emerges from scientificthrillingis not in fact revealed to us by natureobservationbut painstakingly co-constructed by bothitself,and observer?natureWhat supports the argument that3.modern system of classificationthea construct of human knowledge,isonto the messiness of thesuperimposedIII. Methods and toolsIII. Methods and toolsmotivator to look at the world scientifically.For discussionPatterns and orderworld in order to make sense of it?197
III. Methods and toolshas a number of different meaningsObjectivityon the context. In the context ofdependingand scientific practice, the connotationscienceone of freedom from bias and value-isIn other words, it is the principleneutrality.separation between scientist and science,ofthat observers and experimenters do notsuchdescriptions of their observation orinfluenceknowledge is what Thomas NagelObjective“the view from nowhere” (1986) and whatcallscalls “knowledge without a knower”PopperIs such perspective-less knowledge(1979).in science, or indeed at all? To whatpossibledoes the scientific method protect againstextentperspectives and fallibility? The feministhumanpost-colonial perspectives we explored inandsuggest that scientific knowledge alwaysII.7the mark of its producers and the contextbearsits production, while III.1 examined theofof theory on observation. Does natureinfluenceis a second sense in which objectivity findsTherein science, a way for scientists to makeexpressionirrelevant to the process and productthemselvesscience. This is the ideal of formal objectivity,ofprocedures are perfectly followed bywhereThe removal of subjectivity fromscientists.happens through the standardization,scienceindeed universalization of units, toolsandeven laboratory organisms. If humanandare unable to restrain themselvesresearchersinfluencing the outcomes of scientificfrommachines might. For instance, scientificmethods,has widely replaced scientificphotographythat was once widely popular inillustrationBut can technology produced by humanbotany.be free of human perspective? We explorebeingsidea of the neutrality of technology inthis3. Chapterlengths to which scientists go to be objectiveThefor incredible stories. Consider, for example,makewe know the length of 1 metre. It involveshowexpedition that first measured and establishedanlength of a metre as a one ten-millionth ofthedistance between the equator and the NorththeTwo centuries later it was discovered thatPole.result was accurate to less than the widththea human hair. It may be surprising that howofagree about measurements of length, masswetime are linked to the events and values ofandFrench Revolution. The units establishedthewere envisioned to be “for all time, forthenpeople”, a goal no doubt influenced by theallideals and movements of the period.politicalmeter has since been pegged to constant (theTheof light in a vacuum), which is truly forspeedtime, as opposed to transient phenomena—allrecently as 2018 the kilogram underwent aAsprocess. It is currently defined in terms ofsimilarspecial metal cylinder called Le GrandeK, theaof which are kept deep underground incopiesrooms secured with three locks. By the timetworead this, the kilogram will be tied to theyou7III.4 Objectivity: For all people,for all timeinterpretations of their results.including even the Earth.speak for itself? Can we, and do we, let it?Figure 7.8 Kibbl balan at th National Instituts of Standardsand Thnology, USA, that idntis th wight of 1 kilogram basdon th Plank onstant198
- Page 153 and 154: II. Perspectivespractices of the cu
- Page 155 and 156: religious knowledge lose something,
- Page 157 and 158: what extent can we comprehend the w
- Page 159 and 160: II. Perspectivesone, it allows stra
- Page 161 and 162: the context of perspectives, it is
- Page 163 and 164: view has been criticized for being
- Page 165 and 166: David Thoreau was a naturalist, wri
- Page 167 and 168: III. Methods and toolsdisasters are
- Page 169 and 170: IV. Ethicswe have an ethical respon
- Page 171 and 172: IV. EthicsSinger described conseque
- Page 173 and 174: IV. Ethics1962, generals seized pow
- Page 175 and 176: recent human activity called scienc
- Page 177 and 178: II. Perspectivessection explores th
- Page 179 and 180: II. Perspectivessaid to be in crisi
- Page 181 and 182: II. PerspectivesNewton’s theory?
- Page 183 and 184: II. Perspectives19th century reveal
- Page 185 and 186: II. PerspectivesWhat are some scien
- Page 187 and 188: II. Perspectivesof Duesberg’s pap
- Page 189 and 190: II. Perspectivesis a highly simplif
- Page 191 and 192: II. Perspectivesterms: Symphony ofS
- Page 193 and 194: II. Perspectivesorigin story of gen
- Page 195 and 196: II. Perspectivestechnical debates i
- Page 197 and 198: II. Perspectivesfar this section ha
- Page 199 and 200: II. Perspectivesthe kind of problem
- Page 201 and 202: III. Methods and toolsthe scientifi
- Page 203: III. Methods and toolsunrecognized
- Page 207 and 208: III. Methods and toolsthe link to t
- Page 209 and 210: IV. Ethicswas the wartime head of t
- Page 211 and 212: IV. Ethicsan essential, imperfect a
- Page 213 and 214: 8Human scienceschapter is about the
- Page 215 and 216: I. Scopeof an idea or theory coming
- Page 217 and 218: I. Scopecentral cause of the profes
- Page 219 and 220: I. Scopeidea of describing society
- Page 221 and 222: who had been placed at the ‘lower
- Page 223 and 224: explore perspectives on the existen
- Page 225 and 226: II. Perspectivesallegations of scie
- Page 227 and 228: we look at the simplifications that
- Page 229 and 230: II. PerspectivesIII. Methods and to
- Page 231 and 232: III. Methods and toolslack of diver
- Page 233 and 234: III. Methods and toolssensitivity
- Page 235 and 236: III. Methods and toolsMargaret Mead
- Page 237 and 238: III. Methods and toolstheir presenc
- Page 239 and 240: III. Methods and toolstold Mahbub,
- Page 241 and 242: III. Methods and toolsY. Thinley, a
- Page 243 and 244: III. Methods and toolsis the scope
- Page 245 and 246: III. Methods and toolssignificant c
- Page 247 and 248: III. Methods and toolsIV. Ethics7 d
- Page 249 and 250: IV. Ethicschange … brings togethe
- Page 251 and 252: last example brings together ideas
- Page 253 and 254: to show it how it was.” This was
III. Methods and tools
has a number of different meanings
Objectivity
on the context. In the context of
depending
and scientific practice, the connotation
science
one of freedom from bias and value-
is
In other words, it is the principle
neutrality.
separation between scientist and science,
of
that observers and experimenters do not
such
descriptions of their observation or
influence
knowledge is what Thomas Nagel
Objective
“the view from nowhere” (1986) and what
calls
calls “knowledge without a knower”
Popper
Is such perspective-less knowledge
(1979).
in science, or indeed at all? To what
possible
does the scientific method protect against
extent
perspectives and fallibility? The feminist
human
post-colonial perspectives we explored in
and
suggest that scientific knowledge always
II.7
the mark of its producers and the context
bears
its production, while III.1 examined the
of
of theory on observation. Does nature
influence
is a second sense in which objectivity finds
There
in science, a way for scientists to make
expression
irrelevant to the process and product
themselves
science. This is the ideal of formal objectivity,
of
procedures are perfectly followed by
where
The removal of subjectivity from
scientists.
happens through the standardization,
science
indeed universalization of units, tools
and
even laboratory organisms. If human
and
are unable to restrain themselves
researchers
influencing the outcomes of scientific
from
machines might. For instance, scientific
methods,
has widely replaced scientific
photography
that was once widely popular in
illustration
But can technology produced by human
botany.
be free of human perspective? We explore
beings
idea of the neutrality of technology in
this
3. Chapter
lengths to which scientists go to be objective
The
for incredible stories. Consider, for example,
make
we know the length of 1 metre. It involves
how
expedition that first measured and established
an
length of a metre as a one ten-millionth of
the
distance between the equator and the North
the
Two centuries later it was discovered that
Pole.
result was accurate to less than the width
the
a human hair. It may be surprising that how
of
agree about measurements of length, mass
we
time are linked to the events and values of
and
French Revolution. The units established
the
were envisioned to be “for all time, for
then
people”, a goal no doubt influenced by the
all
ideals and movements of the period.
political
meter has since been pegged to constant (the
The
of light in a vacuum), which is truly for
speed
time, as opposed to transient phenomena—
all
recently as 2018 the kilogram underwent a
As
process. It is currently defined in terms of
similar
special metal cylinder called Le GrandeK, the
a
of which are kept deep underground in
copies
rooms secured with three locks. By the time
two
read this, the kilogram will be tied to the
you
7
III.4 Objectivity: For all people,
for all time
interpretations of their results.
including even the Earth.
speak for itself? Can we, and do we, let it?
Figure 7.8 Kibbl balan at th National Instituts of Standards
and Thnology, USA, that idntis th wight of 1 kilogram basd
on th Plank onstant
198