21.11.2022 Views

Theory of Knowledge - Course Companion for Students Marija Uzunova Dang Arvin Singh Uzunov Dang

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

the 21st century the task of explaining nature

In

largely fallen to science, but this is a relatively

has

occurrence. Explanations of natural

recent

have occupied religious thought and

phenomena

1967 Clarence Glacken published a fairly

In

account of the relationships

comprehensive

religion and nature in the Western

between

This inspired other investigations into

world.

environmental impacts of Western culture,

the

philosophy and science. These works

religion,

“an epic struggle in Western culture

portray

organicist and mechanist worldviews

between

between those who view the natural world as

sacred and having intrinsic value, and

somehow

who view the Earth as a way station to a

those

realm beyond the Earth …” (Glacken

heavenly

Religion was viewed as both culprit and

1967).

in the environmental destruction story.

saviour

in 1967 Lynn White published an article

Also

argued that Abrahamic religions (Judaism,

that

and Islam) perpetuated modes

Christianity

living that were inherently damaging to

of

environment, and argued, like Toynbee a

the

later, that the solution to this problem

decade

also be essentially religious” (White

“must

In these authors’ view, Buddhism or

1967).

were more sensitive to nature than

Paganism

prevailing monotheism. Combined with

the

forces of the era, the existential threat

cultural

the Cold War, and growing alarm about

of

degradation, this all made

environmental

more curious about and receptive

Westerners

non-Western religious traditions. Max Weber

to

had already traced capitalism’s unbridled

(1958)

Buddhism, Hinduism, Paganism and

ideas.

belief systems and traditions showed

Indigenous

to offer more environmentally sensitive

up

and behaviours.

values

view was romantic and simplistic—

White’s

religions were causing environmental

Western

and Asian or Indigenous traditions

destruction

inherently nature-friendly. Yi Fu Tuan

were

an influential article in 1968 disputing

published

ideas, noting that deforestation predated

these

that Asian nations did not have a

Christianity,

impressive environmental record,

particularly

that many regions of the world had

and

environmental decline, scaled for

witnessed

numbers, well before the arrival of

population

Western civilization.

modern

scholars agree that nature plays a role

Numerous

shaping religion, and vice versa, but there is

in

less agreement on the important

comparatively

These include whether religion helps or

details.

adaption to the environment, and the

hinders

of this influence in relation to other

strength

features. For decades, anthropologists

cultural

been investigating the role of religion and/

have

spiritual beliefs in Indigenous Peoples’ ability

or

thrive in their environmental contexts. A

to

evolutionary argument is based on “the

common

of the most sustainable”—or the idea

survival

culture is a set of adaptations to a specific

that

and that religions evolved to guide

environment,

towards successful adaptations. This was

people

view of anthropologist Julian Steward, who

the

Indigenous Peoples in North America’s

studied

Basin. Another anthropologist, Marvin

Great

stated in the 1960s that the sacredness of

Harris,

in India was ecologically advantageous,

cows

to sustain the nutrient cycles of agroecosystems

serving

and the carrying capacity of the land.

III. Methods and tools

III. Methods and tools

III.3 Religion and nature

The present threat to mankind’s survival can be

removed only by a revolutionary change of heart in

individual human beings. This change of heart must

be inspired by religion in order to generate the will

power needed for putting arduous new ideals into

practice.

(Toynbee quoted in Porritt 1984)

practice, and been reflected in it, for millennia.

Harris subsequently generalized as follows.

Beliefs and rituals that appear to the nonanthropological

observer as wholly irrational, whimsical, and even

maladaptive have been shown to possess important

positive functions and to be the dependent variable of

recurrent adaptive processes.

(Harris 1971)

consumption of natural resources to religious

155

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!