21.11.2022 Views

Theory of Knowledge - Course Companion for Students Marija Uzunova Dang Arvin Singh Uzunov Dang

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

to affirm the diversity among Indigenous

necessary

and their rights to self-determination.

Peoples

are said to be Indigenous based on

People

and recognition from their

self-identification

The idea of measuring indigeneity

community.

bloodline is problematic, as the Australian

by

Rights and Equal Opportunity

Human

reported in2002.

Commission

Aboriginal people may generally be direct

While

of the original inhabitants of a particular

descendants

form of ‘Seth begat Enosh begat Kenan’

genealogical

order to prove membership of the group. … A

in

may have been adopted into a kinship group

person

there is no direct or suitable ospring to carry

where

ceremonial obligations. … Genetic science

out

have no part to play in determining whether

should

not a person should be eligible for benets. If the

or

of descent is to remain in Australian law

element

a test of Aboriginality, it should be interpreted in

as

with Indigenous cultural protocols.

accordance

United Nations Working Group on

The

Populations (WGIP) adopted a

Indigenous

definition in 1982 but would not

preliminary

on a lasting definition. Later, James Anaya,

agree

United Nations Special Rapporteur on

former

Rights of Indigenous Peoples, made an

the

to define Indigenous Peoples as: “living

attempt

of pre-invasion inhabitants of

descendants

now dominated by others [that remain]

lands

distinct groups that find themselves

culturally

by other settler societies born of forces

engulfed

empire and conquest” (Anaya 2004).

of

leaders have argued that any definition

Indigenous

indigeneity must refer to their ties to land and

of

Many, such as Māori scholar Linda Tuhiwai

place.

of the Ngāti Awa and Ngāti Porou iwi,

Smith

referring to a range of distinct peoples and

By

using the single word “Indigenous”, do we

cultures

Rights include individual as well as

Indigenous

rights. It is the collective rights that protect

collective

basis of Indigenous society, and for which

the

recognition is important from nation states

ongoing

multilateral organizations. Collective rights

and

the rights to self-determination, subsistence

include

self-governance and land. In the context

economies,

Indigenous sovereignty, it is worth pointing out

of

settler states are not being petitioned to grant

that

to Indigenous Peoples, but to recognize and

rights

concept of international human rights

The

the Western democratic societies that

reflects

them, and has tended to overlook

designed

rights in favour of individual rights.

collective

relationships did

Indigenous-settler

begin with the “Age of Discovery”

not

between European

encounters

and their colonies. Most

empires

cultures arrived and settled

human

place at some point in history,

into

the messy timeline of who was

and

first, and what happened upon

where

create the backdrop of claims

contact,

indigeneity today.

to

Ainu, Japan’s Indigenous

The

are a noteworthy example.

People,

by the Japanese state

Acknowledged

in 2008, and officially

only

I. Scope

I. Scope

question whether we should use a single term at all.

of Australia, Indigenous customary law does not

part

on linear proof of descent in the Judeo-Christian

rely

undermine and ignore their differing experiences?

uphold Indigenous Rights, Title and Law.

Box 5.1: The Ainu—Japan’s Indigenous People

Figure 5.1

Ainu group from the Island of Hokkaido or Yezo, Department of

Anthropology, 1904 World’s Fair

113

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!