11.10.2022 Views

Law_of_Evidence_in_Kenya

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Section 50 (1) of the Evidence Act provides that when the court has to form an opinion as to the

person by whom any document was written or signed, the opinion of any person acquainted with

the handwriting of the person by whom it is supposed to be written or signed that it was or was

not written or signed by that person, is admissible.

A person is said to be acquainted with the hand-writing of another person when he has seen that

person write, or when he has received documents purporting to be written by that person in

answer to documents written by himself or under his authority and addressed to that person, or

when in the ordinary course of business documents purporting to be written by that person have

been habitually submitted to him.

In Doe d Mudd v Suckermore 84 Coleridge J on how to prove handwritings said: either witness

has seen the party on some other occasion or he has corresponded with him and transactions

have taken place between them, upon the faith that letters purporting to have been written or

signed have been so written or signed.

Section 51 states that opinions as to the existence of any general custom or rights, that is custom

or right common to any considerable class of persons, given by persons who would be likely to

know of such customs or rights are admissible.

Section 52 provides that opinions of persons having special means of knowledge are admissible

as to the usages and tenets of anybody of men or family, the constitution and government of any

religious or charitable foundation.

Section 53 provides that when a court has to form an opinion as to the relationship of one person

to another, the opinion expressed by the conduct as to the existence of such relationships of any

person who as a member of the family or otherwise has special means of knowledge on the

subject is admissible.

IDENTIFICATION EVIDENCE

Usually it‟s often the expression of an opinion that a person seen at one time (at the scene of

crime) is the same person as was seen at some other time (in court, identification parade).

84 (1837)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!