koski1968 BAUME

Thcrc is, as TW have seen, much c~vitlence, both clinical and experimental,
that can be used to support these theories.“’ SO. li5f RS, w The t hcorics, howr’vt~r’, arc
not explicit enough, it seems, and they ha\e not, been prowd beyond an?- doubt.
Nerertheless, they appear valuable as stimuli and as l\orking hppothwrs for
further research in the field. Rincc so many observations apptlar Incompatible
with older views, we should keep an opw mind and look I’or c~xplanations and
theories that would be in agreement with all the known facts.
The author’s own research reported here has been supported by grants from The Sigrid
Juselius Foundation, Helsinki, Finland, and from the National Inst,itutes of Dcmtal Research
(Dl434, DE-01793) and of Child Health am1 Human Development (HI)-001 771, United
States Public Health Service.
REFERENCES
1. Andersen, H.: Histochemistry and Development of the Human Shoulder and Acromioclavicular
Joints With Particular Refcrenre to the Early Development of the Clavicle,
Aeta Anat. 55: 124-165, 1963.
2. Applrbaum, E.: Integration of Anatomic and Cephalometric Studies of Growth of the
Head, A&f. J. ORTHOIMZNTIC~ 39: 6’12-622, 1953.
3. Bvis, V.: The Significance of the Angle of the Mandible: An Experimental and Comparative
Study, Am. J. Phys. Anthrop. 19: 55-61, 1961.
4. Baer, M. J.: Patterns of Growth of the Skull as Revcalod by Vital Staining, Hurrmn Biol.
26: 80-126, 1954.
5. Balinsky, B. I.: An Introduction to Embryology, Philadelphia, 1960, W. B. Saunders Co.
6. Baume, L. J.: The Postnatal Growth Activity of the Nasal Cartilage Septum, Helvet.
odont. acta 5: 9-13, 1961.
7. Baume, L. J. : Principles of Cephalofacial Development Revealed by Experiment,al Biology,
AM. J. ORTIIOD~NTICS 47: 881-901, 1961.
8. Baume, L. J., and Derichsweiler, H.: Is the Condylar Growth Center Responsive to
Orthodontic Treatment B Oral Surg., Oral Med. & Oral Path. 14: 347-362, 1961.
9. Bjark, A. : Cranial Base Development, AM. J. ORTHODONTICS 41: 198-225, 1955.
10. Bjb;rk, A.: Variations in the Growth Pattern of the Human Mandible: Longitudinal
Radiographic Study by the Implant Method, J. D. Res. 42: 400-411, 1963.
11. Bjb;rk, A.: Sutural Growth of the Upper Face Studied by the Implant Method, Acta
odont. scandinav. 24: 109-127, 1966.
12. Blackwood, H. J. J.: Growth of the Mandibular Condyle of the Rat Studied With
Tritiated Thymidinc, Arch. Oral Biol. 11: 493-500, 1966.
13. Blount, W. B., and Clarke, G. R,.: Control of Bone Growth by Epiphyseal Stapling, J.
Bone & Joint Surg. 31A: 464-478, 1949.
14. Brash, J. C., McKeag, H. T. il., and Scott, J. H.: The Aetiology of Irregularity and
Malocclusion of the Teeth, ed. 2, London, 1956, The Dental Board of the United Kingdom.
15. Breitner, C.: Bone Changes Resulting From Experimental Orthodontic Treatment, AM. .J.
ORTHODONTICS &ORAL 9~~~26: 521-547, 1940.
16. Breitner, C.: Further Investigations of Bone Changes Resulting Fro’m Experimental
Orthodontic Treatment, AM. J. ORTHODO~ICS & ORAL SURG. 27: 605-632, 1941.
17. Coulombre, A. J., and Crelin, E. 8.: The Role of the Developing Eye in the Morphogenesis
of the Avian Skull, Am. J. Phys. Anthrop. 16: 25.37, 1958.
18. Das, A., Meyer, J., and Sicher, H.: X-ray and Alizarin Studies on the Effect of Bilateral
Condylectomy in the Rat, Angle Orthodontist 3.5: 138.148, 1965.
19. BuBrul, E. L., and Laskin, D. M.: Prcadaptivo Potentialities of the Mammalian Skull :
An Experiment in Growth and Form, Am. J. Anat. 109: 117-132, 1961.
20. Enlow, D. H., and Harris, D. B.: A Study of the Postnatal Growth of the Human
Mandible, AM. J. ORTHODONTICS 50: 25-50, 1964.