CONCLUSIONS ADOPTED BY THE EXECUTIVE ... - UNHCR
CONCLUSIONS ADOPTED BY THE EXECUTIVE ... - UNHCR
CONCLUSIONS ADOPTED BY THE EXECUTIVE ... - UNHCR
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
The Executive Committee,<br />
1988 (Executive Committee—39 th Session)<br />
No. 53 (XXXIX) STOWAWAY ASYLUM-SEEKERS ∗ (1988)<br />
Recognizing that stowaway asylum-seekers often find themselves in a particularly vulnerable situation in<br />
need of international protection and durable solutions;<br />
Recalling its Conclusion No. 15 (XXX) on Refugees without an Asylum Country adopted at the thirtieth<br />
session of the Executive Committee;<br />
Reaffirming the necessity of giving proper attention to the needs of stowaway asylum-seekers including<br />
arranging for their disembarkation, determining their refugee status and, whenever required, providing them<br />
with a durable solution;<br />
Noting that there are at present no general and internationally recognized rules dealing specifically with<br />
stowaway asylum-seekers and at the same time recognizing that asylum-seekers should be given the special<br />
consideration that their situation demands;<br />
Recommended that States and <strong>UNHCR</strong> take into account the following guidelines when dealing with actual<br />
cases of stowaway asylum-seekers:<br />
1. Like other asylum-seekers, stowaway asylum-seekers must be protected against forcible return to their<br />
country of origin.<br />
2. Without prejudice to any responsibilities of the flag State, stowaway asylum-seekers should, whenever<br />
possible, be allowed to disembark at the first port of call and given the opportunity of having their refugee status<br />
determined by the authorities, provided that this does not necessarily imply durable solution in the country of<br />
the port of disembarkation.<br />
3. Normally <strong>UNHCR</strong> would be requested to assist in finding a durable solution for those found to be<br />
refugees, based on all relevant aspects of the case.<br />
∗ CONCLUSION ENDORSED <strong>BY</strong> <strong>THE</strong> <strong>EXECUTIVE</strong> COMMITTEE OF <strong>THE</strong> HIGH COMMISSIONER’S<br />
PROGRAMME UPON <strong>THE</strong> RECOMMENDATION OF <strong>THE</strong> SUB-COMMITTEE OF <strong>THE</strong> WHOLE ON<br />
INTERNATIONAL PROTECTION OF REFUGEES<br />
71