CONCLUSIONS ADOPTED BY THE EXECUTIVE ... - UNHCR

More documents

Recommendations

Info

1981 (Executive Committee—32 nd Session) (6) In a spirit of international solidarity, Governments should also seek to ensure that the causes leading to large-scale influxes of asylum-seekers are as far as possible removed and, where such influxes have occurred, that conditions favourable to voluntary repatriation are established. 30
1981 (Executive Committee—32 nd Session) No. 23 (XXXII) PROBLEMS RELATED TO THE RESCUE OF ASYLUM-SEEKERS IN DISTRESS AT SEA ∗ (1981) The Executive Committee, Adopted the following conclusions on problems related to the rescue of asylum-seekers in distress at sea. 1. It is recalled that there is a fundamental obligation under international law for ships' masters to rescue any persons in distress at sea, including asylum-seekers, and to render them all necessary assistance. Seafaring States should take all appropriate measures to ensure that masters of vessels observe this obligation strictly. 2. Rescue of asylum-seekers in distress at sea has been facilitated by the willingness of the flag States of rescuing ships to provide guarantees of resettlement required by certain coastal States as a condition for disembarkation. In has also been facilitated by the agreement of these and other States to contribute to a pool of resettlement guarantees under the DISERO scheme which should be further encouraged. All countries should continue to provide durable solutions for asylum-seekers rescued at sea. 3. In accordance with established international practice, supported by the relevant international instruments, persons rescued at sea should normally be disembarked at the next port of call. This practice should also be applied in the case of asylum-seekers rescued at sea. In cases of large-scale influx, asylum-seekers rescued at sea should always be admitted, at least on a temporary basis. States should assist in facilitating their disembarkation by acting in accordance with the principles of international solidarity and burden-sharing in granting resettlement opportunities. 4. As a result of concerted efforts by many countries, large numbers of resettlement opportunities have been, and continue to be, provided for boat people. In view of this development, the question arises as to whether the first port of call countries might wish to examine their present policy of requiring resettlement guarantees as a precondition for disembarkation. Pending a review of practice by coastal States, it is of course desirable that present arrangements for facilitating disembarkation be continued. 5. In view of the complexity of the problems arising from the rescue, disembarkation and resettlement of asylum-seekers at sea, the High Commissioner is requested to convene at an early opportunity a working group comprising representatives of the maritime States and the coastal States most concerned, potential countries of resettlement, and representatives of international bodies competent in this field. The working group should study the various problems mentioned and elaborate principles and measures which would provide a solution and should submit a report on the matter to the Executive Committee at its thirty-third session. ∗ CONCLUSION ENDORSED BY THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE OF THE HIGH COMMISSIONER’S PROGRAMME UPON THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE SUB-COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE ON INTERNATIONAL PROTECTION OF REFUGEES 31
Page 1 and 2: CONCLUSIONS ADOPTED BY THE EXECUTIV
Page 3 and 4: 33. No. 33 (XXXV) General (1984) ..
Page 5: 1975 (Executive Committee—26 th S
Page 8 and 9: The Executive Committee, 1977 (Exec
Page 19: The Executive Committee, 1978 (Exec
Page 32 and 33: 1981 (Executive Committee—32 nd S
Page 38 and 39: 1982 (Executive Committee—33 rd S
Page 40 and 41: 1982 (Executive Committee—33 rd S
Page 42 and 43: 1983 (Executive Committee—34 th S
Page 85 and 86:
The Executive Committee, 1990 (Exec
Page 87 and 88:
1990 (Executive Committee—41 st S
Page 89 and 90:
Page 91 and 92:
Page 93 and 94:
Page 95 and 96:
Page 97 and 98:
1992 (Executive Committee—43 rd S
Page 99:
Page 102 and 103:
1993 (Executive Committee—44 th S
Page 104 and 105:
Page 106 and 107:
Page 108 and 109:
Page 110 and 111:
Page 112 and 113:
Page 115 and 116:
Page 117:
Page 120 and 121:
Page 122 and 123:
Page 125 and 126:
Page 127 and 128:
Page 129 and 130:
Page 131 and 132:
Page 133 and 134:
Page 135 and 136:
Page 137 and 138:
Page 139:
Page 142 and 143:
2000 (Executive Committee—51 st S
Page 144 and 145:
2001 (Executive Committee—52 nd S
Page 146 and 147:
2001 (Executive Committee—52 nd S
Page 148 and 149:
Page 151 and 152:
Page 153 and 154:
Page 155:
Page 158 and 159:
Page 160 and 161:
Page 162 and 163:
Page 164 and 165:
Page 166 and 167:
Page 169 and 170:
Page 171 and 172:
causes; 2004 (Executive Committee
Page 173 and 174:
Page 175:
Page 178 and 179:
Page 180 and 181:
Page 182 and 183:
Page 184 and 185:
Page 186 and 187:
Page 188 and 189:
Page 190 and 191:
Page 192 and 193:
Page 194 and 195:
Page 196 and 197:
Page 198 and 199:
Page 200 and 201:
Refugees and others of concern with
Page 202 and 203:
Page 204 and 205:
Page 206 and 207:
Index to the Executive Committee Co
Page 208 and 209:
Index to the Executive Committee Co
show all

CONCLUSIONS ADOPTED BY THE EXECUTIVE ... - UNHCR

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?