25.12.2012 Views

CONCLUSIONS ADOPTED BY THE EXECUTIVE ... - UNHCR

CONCLUSIONS ADOPTED BY THE EXECUTIVE ... - UNHCR

CONCLUSIONS ADOPTED BY THE EXECUTIVE ... - UNHCR

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The Executive Committee,<br />

1980 (Executive Committee—31 st Session)<br />

No. 19 (XXXI) TEMPORARY REFUGE ∗ (1980)<br />

(a) Reaffirmed the essential need for the humanitarian legal principle of non-refoulement to be<br />

scrupulously observed in all situations of large-scale influx;<br />

(b) Recalled the conclusions on the question of temporary refuge adopted by the Executive Committee at<br />

its thirtieth session and, in particular:<br />

(i) that in the case of large-scale influx, persons seeking asylum should always receive at least<br />

temporary refuge; and<br />

(ii) that States which, because of their geographical situation or otherwise, are faced with a largescale<br />

influx, should as necessary and at the request of the State concerned receive immediate<br />

assistance from other States in accordance with the principle of equitable burden-sharing;<br />

(c) Took note of the extensive practice of granting temporary refuge in situations involving a large-scale<br />

influx of refugees;<br />

(d) Stressed the fundamental importance of the provisions of the 1951 United Nations Convention relating<br />

to the Status of Refugees and the 1967 Protocol, and of the 1967 United Nations Declaration on Territorial<br />

Asylum and the need for constant advice by <strong>UNHCR</strong> on the practical application of these provisions by<br />

countries exposed to a large-scale influx of refugees;<br />

(e) Stressed the exceptional character of temporary refuge and the essential need for persons to whom<br />

temporary refuge has been granted to enjoy basic humanitarian standards of treatment;<br />

(f) Recognized the need to define the nature, function and implications of the grant of temporary refuge;<br />

(g) Considered that the practice of temporary refuge had not been sufficiently examined and should be<br />

further studied, particularly in regard to (i) procedures for the admission of refugees, (ii) their status pending a<br />

durable solution, (iii) the implications of temporary refuge for international solidarity, including burden sharing;<br />

(h) Decided to request the High Commissioner to convene as soon as possible a representative group of<br />

experts to examine temporary refuge in all its aspects within the framework of the problems raised by largescale<br />

influx and to provide the group with all possible assistance.<br />

∗ CONCLUSION ENDORSED <strong>BY</strong> <strong>THE</strong> <strong>EXECUTIVE</strong> COMMITTEE OF <strong>THE</strong> HIGH COMMISSIONER’S<br />

PROGRAMME UPON <strong>THE</strong> RECOMMENDATION OF <strong>THE</strong> SUB-COMMITTEE OF <strong>THE</strong> WHOLE ON<br />

INTERNATIONAL PROTECTION OF REFUGEES<br />

24

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!